<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=66&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CTitle" accessDate="2026-10-03T02:38:21+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>66</pageNumber>
      <perPage>100</perPage>
      <totalResults>6561</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="6777" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6586">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e1f21df7afd232472e755adf61dbe7da.jpg</src>
        <authentication>bf0b847c6a59f57ea858fac0fdd5e2ac</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74269">
                <text>Max Fink, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74270">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74271">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74272">
                <text>2007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74274">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74275">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74277">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74278">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87533">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6769" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6578">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c1adcfc50e8cb270487b43e0a89d86d3.jpg</src>
        <authentication>957379d25c584165ba4c98583bc8031f</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74192">
                <text>Max Fink, high school, 1939</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74193">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74194">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74195">
                <text>1939</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74197">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74198">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74200">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74201">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87525">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6773" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6582">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e2dfa694e56791492ce34290f8ee13c6.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f4908ca956dd101ab6f2236cb1a3dcb7</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74231">
                <text>Max Fink, Lieutenant, U.S. Army</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74232">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74233">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74235">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74236">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74238">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74239">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87529">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6774" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6583">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f1e473fb184518ae72cd1702ef7a72f7.jpg</src>
        <authentication>16b46e52874c84a7ad290c767850e3ff</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74240">
                <text>Max Fink, Lieutenant, U.S. Army</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74241">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74242">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74244">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74245">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74247">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74248">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87530">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6785" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6596">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/75d624085f8c0afe37811fb0be99c244.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f4b44170ab8e177aece10929c0bc2fcf</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74347">
                <text>Max Fink, MD (left) and Charles Kellner, MD (right) of the Journal of ECT editorial board</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74348">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74349">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74351">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74352">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74354">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74355">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87541">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6780" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6589">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2ef50e7d426e02889a9c9b6b41b9e30a.jpg</src>
        <authentication>3c467e087aafb1b312cac2a541d432a4</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74299">
                <text>Max Fink, Nykoping, Sweden, 2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74300">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74301">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74302">
                <text>2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74304">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74305">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74307">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74308">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87536">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6779" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6588">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/13115a9834bd57ad71f18d39e4271f96.jpg</src>
        <authentication>cba9cbd3d43c44914abb6877a0b218ee</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74289">
                <text>Max Fink, pilot identification and license record, 1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74290">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74291">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74292">
                <text>1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74294">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74295">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74297">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74298">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87535">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6775" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6584">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e9c35b476f08f9def6067c31e43766ba.jpg</src>
        <authentication>0f5e91adefcf1752e635029b5132d222</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74249">
                <text>Max Fink, Private first class, U.S. Army, 1943-1945</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74250">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74251">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74252">
                <text>1943-1945</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74254">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74255">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74257">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74258">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87531">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6772" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6581">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9bde6be6bc795aa367e0ff3ce1a1cf46.jpg</src>
        <authentication>d63c5320d960711e3a969b3b25f295ab</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74221">
                <text>Max Fink, research director at Hillside Hospital, 1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74222">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74223">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74224">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74226">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74227">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74229">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74230">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87528">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6771" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6580">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/51e43c2b6279ed3231fc821d51cd7972.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f293003cd763a906c079bb313411d56f</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74211">
                <text>Max Fink, ship surgeon, American Export Line, 1948</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74212">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74213">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74214">
                <text>1948</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74216">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74217">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74219">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74220">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87527">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6789" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6600">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/1d2bcbef57a00fd9c29be83dab6e11c2.jpg</src>
        <authentication>a350b40dfa079384f6e458cb8cd13966</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74386">
                <text>Max Fink, Taylor Manor Hospital Award, 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74387">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74388">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-027</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74389">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74391">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74392">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74394">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74395">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87545">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6746" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6546">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/10dd96ea03d444a3545ca7a104bdf5fe.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a67bc54ff65c228d90099b2591e160d9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107151">
                    <text>SOCIAL FACTORS AND COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS

I:
11:

III:

From

Pollack Ph.D.

Choice and Results of Therapy

-

Duration of Hospitalization and Diagnosis

- Robert

Observations in an Interview Setting

- Joseph Jaffe

Max

L. Kahn Ph.D.

.

M.D.

the Department or Murmantal Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

L.I. , NJ.

Presented October 19, 1958,

at Hillside Hospital.

�III:

9-29-58

Social Factors and Commmication in Psychiatric Patients
1: Choice and Results of Therapy
Recent investigations by Hollingshead, Redlich, Frank, Levinson
and others have indicated a

relation

between

social class and

psychiatric disorder with respect to type and incidence of mental

illness, selection

be present

and maintenance of treatment and therapeutic outcome.

report is concerned with the role of social factors in the

.

selection and efﬁcacy of therapy in Hillside Hospital.
me most intensive analysis of the relationship of social class to
mental

illness has

been recently reported by Hollingshead, Redlich and

their coworkers. In their studies the population of New Haven was
divided into five social classes on the basis of weighted criteria or
education, occupation and place of residence. or the residents who were
under psychiatric care, those from the upper social classes were more

frequently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or

custodial care

was more

comm among the lower classes. Of the

psychotherapies, psychoanalysis was entirely restricted to the We upper
groups. Social class was the predominant determinant of the type of

treatment selected even when the diagnosis was held constant. They
summarize

their observations as follows: I'....

it

is found that

and
does
treatment
not depend on psychological
medical determinants

alone, but on the status position of the patient as well. Psychotherapeuﬁc

in disproportionately high degree to the upper social
data of this study would seem to indicate that most

methods are, applied

levels.

The

�in a setting where the background of the
patient is similar to that of the therapist."
It is possible, however, to relate the results obtained from these
commity studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial
psychotherapy takes place

resources or the extent and type of treatment
more

critical test of the

facilities available.

A

importance of social factors affecting choice

of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic tecrmiques
and services are

available to

all patients, regardless

of their ability

to pay.

is

at Hillside Hospital. the of the main
criteria for accepting patients is their “ability to participate
profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with
organic therapies available when needed. Thus a patient is seen in
This requirement

met

regular therapeutic sessions throughout his hospital stay even

when

undergoing a course of caustic therapy. The average length of hospital

stay

is six

months, with some

The purpose

patients remaining from

of the present report

is

12

to 16 months.

to smnmarize the relation

factors of age, education, place of birth, and social
attitude (as measured by the California F scale) to the selection or
between the

treatment and the ratings of improvement at time of discharge in this
environment.

muons
1957 was

The

entire in-patient adult population of

studied. This consisted of

171

patients,

March 7,

57 men and 111; women ,

ranging in age from 16 to 68 years, with a mean of 35 years.

�Procedure: The patients were tested with a ten-item modification

of the California F scale suggested by Levinson. The

F

scale is a

questionnaire which has been related to such factors as authoritarianism,
acquiescence, ethnocentrism and

rigidity.

The

patient reads ten

statements and indicates whether he agrees or disagrees with each
statement and to what extent.
from one to seven and the

The

score given for each item ranges

total score range is

10

to 70.

The

greater

the agreement the higher the score obtained. The statements themselves

are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped expressions. For example, one
of the statements
would be

is: "If

people would talk less and work more, everybody

better off."

Choice of Therapy:

will first take up the relation of these social and psychological
factors to selection for treatment. During the period of this study,
(Table I) approximately one-third of the patients received convulsive
The
small
with
and
two-thirds
treated
psychotherapy
were
only.
therapy
group of patients who received insulin coma and drug therapies are not
We

represented on the slide.

When compared

to psychotherapy patients, the

convulsive group were older, had fewer years of education

not completed grade school

also had a higher

F

-

-

many had

and were frequently foreign born.

They

score, which indicates that these patients tended

to agree with social stereotypes.
At this time, the psychiatric residents and their supervisors
were also tested. Their average F score was 21.8 with a mean age of
thus more closely approximating the psychotherapy group than the

33 .9.

�electroshock group.
This figure has dealt with group averages for each of the factors
mentioned. There was however marked

at
the patients is

variability within each of the

groups, with patients

each end of a wide range.

grouping

shown

group with reSpect to length of

convulsive therapy.

As

One method

in the analysis of the electroshock
hospitalization prior to receiving

illustrated in the next table

electroshock patients were divided into three groups:
were
and

(Table

II),

the

1) those who

after admission, 2) between three
after six months. There is a definite correlation

treated within three
six months, and 3)

of sub-

months

prior to convulsive therapy and F score, age,
education and birthplace. It is of interest that there is a gradient
for each of the social factors. As a group the patients referred for
between length of stay

convulsive therapy

after six

months of

hospitalization are most similar

to the psychotherapy patients with respect to each of the factors.
Che

set of data not

shown

in the slide is the ratio of male to

female patients referred for somatic therapy during each of these

hospitalization periods. Although the ratio of females to males in
the hospital population is two to one, hh per cent of the patients in
the group treated within three months were male.

In the group

hospitalized for six months prior to convulsive therapy, however, only
7

per cent are males. Thus, male patients are referred for electroshock

earlier in their hospital stay than
As

patients.
expected, a larger proportion of depressed patients
female

~ 52

cent - received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.

per
To

�-5.
control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the psychotic
depression patients were subdivided into those

who

received electroshock

and those who were given psychotherapy alone.

The

results are

the next slide (Table

III).

While the two groups are comparable

age and education, the electroshock
mean F

shown

in

for

patients had a significantly higher

score and a higher percentage were foreign born. Thus,

it may

that persons classified as having a psychotic depression are not
necessarily referred for electroshock because they are older or less
educated, but rather that they come from cultural backgrounds that are
be

more commonly

associated with psychologic processes that

make

successful

in the psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapeutic
relationship less likely. These findings are consistent with previous
studies which have shown that patient-therapist differences in systems
communication

of values

may hamper

Redlich note:

"We

therapeutic relationship.

As

Hollingshead and

are not sure what attributes a good patient must have,

but they include sensitivity, intelligence, Social and intellectual
standards similar to the psychiatrist‘s, a will to

do

desire to improve one's personality and status in

life,

attractiveness and charm. Rarely will such standards

one's best, a
youth,

be admitted by

psychiatrists. On the contrary, psychiatrists claim that the selection
for treatment is based on purely psychiatric criteria....."
Results of Therapy:

Social factors are as significantly related to treatment result
as they are to treatment selection.

hospital treatment

on

To

the 171 patients,

analyze the effects of the
we

selected the discharge

�evaluation as the criterion of improvement. At time of discharge a

patient is classified in

one of four

categories: recovered,

much

improved, improved or unimproved.

relation of social factors to the discharge evaluations is
presented in the next slide (Table IV). There is a definite, almost
The

linear relationship, between the improvement rating and these four
social factors. The recovered group of patients had the highest F
scores, were oldest, least educated and
of foreign

birth. In contrast,

showed the

highest incidence

the unimproved group had the lowest F

scores, were younger and better educated - almost all having gone to
college - and were primarily native~born.

for patients treated with convulsive therapy
the improvement ratings parallel those for the total population.

Analyzing the data

(Table V)

Again, the recovered group had the highest mean F scores, was the oldest,
most poorly educated with the highest incidence of foreign

birth.

The

illustrates the relation of these observations

next slide (Table VI)

to time of referral for treatment. Within the electroshock group
67

per cent of those

who were

treated early in the course of

hoSpitalization were rated as recovered or
those treated

after six

these two groups.
were more

much improved, whereas

months only 30 per cent were

As was

noted

earlier, patients in this latter

similar to the psychotherapy group

It is

classified in

WEUh

respect to these

not surprising, therefore, that they were
treated with somatotheragy only after an extensive course of

social factors.

psychotherapy.

group

�.7In summary, the observations that social factors are related to
type of therapy received as well as therapeutic outcome are consistent

with the studies of Hollingshead, Redlich and their coaworkers.

their findings in demonstrating
that these factors are also significant in a hospital setting where
where
and
selection
of
not
therapeutic
criterion
to
a
is
pay
ability
all forms of therapy are equally available to the entire population.

Furthermore, the present studies extenii

While

the relation between social factors and treatment selection

are clear, and are consistent with previous findings, the relation of
these factors to improvement ratings appears paradoxical.
observations that those patients with high
and

less educated,

more

F

scores,

The

who were

older

often received convulsive therapy and were

discharged more frequently as recovered are consistent with the results

reported in 1956 in a follow-up study of Hillside Hospital patients
conducted by Rachlin, Goldman, Lurie, Gurvitz and Rachlin.

It is

possible that the differences in communication between therapist
patient that result in referral for convulsive therapy may also
influence the discharge rating. Thus,

Kahn and

and

Fink have previously

to denial, evasion,
and
benefit
most
receive
to
and
of
cliches
use
are
likely
stereotypy
from electroshock. Such language patterns appear more frequent in
shown

that verbally

uncommunicative persons, prone

persons in the lower socioeconomic groups. Because of the differences

therapist and patient, the therapist may set different criteria
for improvement for the older less educated patients than he does for

between

the young, sophisticated ones,

�class patient

The lower

may

also set goals for himself that are

The
from
class
patient's
the
different
patient.
upper
qualitatively
aspirations for himself and the therapist's expectancy for the patient
of
time
of
hospital
improvement
at
Ratings
an
interactive
are
process.

discharge are relative in that they refer to a baseline of premorbid
functioning. Thus the rating of recovered is defined as, "the reasonable

expectation that the patient will be able to return to his community
and function as

well, or better, than

he did before he became

ill."

therapist's perception of the patient's premorbid functioning may
be influenced by the distance between his value system and that of
the patient and both influenced by their social class. ‘The greater
the social distance between therapist and patient the less rigorous
the requirements for behavioral change. Fer example, for older, lower
class patients, ability to resume work may loom as the major criterion
The

of improvement. For the upper class patient work adjustment
only one of a

may be

host of criteria, including such intangibles as work

gratification, ease of sociability, etc..
This presentation has dealt with a few of the relationships
between social factors and psychiatric treatment in a voluntary,
psychotherapeutically-oriented hospital. The other speakers will
deal with

many

of the questions

left

unanswered

in this report.

�THERAPY SELECTION

F

Score

Yrs. of
Education

Foreign

gMeanz

Age
{Mean}

Electroshock
(Ii-57)

14306

’40.3

11-2

26%

Psychotherapy

36.1;

32.6

11.8

9%

Groggs

(Na102)

SMean)

%

Born

�.10TABLE

II

LENGTH OF HOSPITALIZATION PRIOR TO
ADMINISTRATION OF ELEBTROSHOCK

F Score
gMeanz

Groygs

Less than

3

{N-Bh)
3

mos.

to 6 mos.

(N-IO)

More

than 6 mos.

(N~13)

Age
(Mean!

Yrs. of
Education
Ween!

%

ForeignBorn

148.3

M45

10.1

1:173

he. 7

39.8

11.7

30%

32.9

29.5

13.14

�-11TABLE

III

SELECTION OF THERAPY IN PATIENTS
WITH PSYCHOTIC DEPRESSION

Yrs. of
Education

Foreign—
Born

F Score
SMean!

Age
SMean)

Electroahock
(N'Bl)

50.3

h8.6

10.6

1:253

Psychotherapy

h1.0

h7.6

10.0

2h%

GrouEs

(n-29)

SMean)___

%

�-12TABLE

:1

SOCIAL FACTORS AND DISCHARGE EVALUATION

F Score
SMean)

Age
gMean)

Yrs. of
Education
gMeanz

1 ForeignBonn

h2.9

Mus

10.7

Much Improved

39.0

35.6

11.2

22%

Improved

36.1

31.2

11.2

16%

31.2

13.2

11%

Recovered

h1%

(N-17 )

(n-82)

(N'63)

Uhimproved

(n-9)

31.1

�-13TABLE V

DISCHARGE EVKLUATION IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY

Yrs.‘of

F Score
sMeanz

Age
SMeanz

Education

%

Foreign-

SMeanz

Born

53.1

51.6

9.u

50%

(N-26)

h2.0

h3.8

10.6

35%

Improved and
unimproved
(Ni23)

39.7

32.3

12.3

12%

Recovered
(N-B)

Much Improved

�-m-

M
TABLE VI

LENGTH OF HOSPITALIZATION PRIOR TO ELECTROSHOCK
AND DISCHARGE EVALUATION

Recovered

Much

8:

Iﬂroved

Improved
U

raved

Groggs

Less than

32%

6 mos.

70%

30%

than 6 mos.

31%

59%

(n-Bh)
3

to

ms.

68%

3

(N-lO)

More

(N-13)

&amp;

�III:

9-29-58

-15-

Social Factors and Communication in Psychiatric Patients

II: Duration of Hospitalization

and Diagnosis

Just heard a presentation of factors associated with the
selection and results of treatments. I will next conéider the relation
You have

of these factors to length of hospitalization and to diagnosis.

It is

obvious that the length of time a patient stays in a mental

hospital is related to the particular function and philosophy of the
institution. In an institution such as Hillside Hospital which admits
only voluntary patients and emphasizes psychoanalytically oriented psychothe
In
limited.
particular
of
is
the
hospitalization
length
therapy,
montthin
16
from
complete
to
one
was
the
studied
the
population
range
L

months.
of
six
over
with
an
stay
slightly
average
hospital,

Several factors can.be postulated which might be related to the
duration of hospitalization. Since

it commonly takes less

time to produce

behavioral change with convulsive therapy than with psychotherapy, one
would expect to

find that the consulsive therapy patients are kept in the

hospital for the shortest period while the psychotherapy patients are here
longer. The data, as presented in Table VII, shows no significant difference
between the two groups.

If

anything, there

is a slight

tendency for

psychotherapy patients at Hillside to be institutionalized for the shorter

period.
A

second possible factor

is the severity of the patient's illness.

be
who
will
necessarily
more
intractable
those
are
that
patients
It
maintained in the hospital further to receive additional treatment.
Examination
demonstrates
shown
Table
in
VIII,
the
however,
as
data,
of
those
that while
patients hospitalized for the shortest period do have
may

be

�Much
and
Improved,
Recovered
of
of
ratings
incidence
discharge
a higher
and
chance
are not significant.
variation
within
a
differences
are
the

In the Hillside followhup study of Rachlin
there was no relationship

EELEE'

it

was

also found that

between discharge evaluation and length of time

in the hospital.
On the basis of the data and discussion presented by Dr. Pollack,
be
should
a relationship
there
that
hypothesis
advance
the
further
can

we

of
and
duration
hospitalization.
the
background
social
patient's
we
oriented
psychotherapy
psychoanalytically
With Hillside's stress on
would expect that those patients who are most like the therapists with regard
between a

to these factors.would be kept

The
the
period.
for
longest
the
in
hospital

data is presented in Table IX. Patients

shortest

who were

period had the highest F scores, were

hospitalized for the

oldest, had the fewest

Conversely,
born.
of
native
and
smallest
the
percentage
education
of
years
F
the
lowest
had
the
scores,
the
who
longest
the
in
hospital
were
those
of
and
smallest
the
percentage
education
of
most
years
youngest ages, the

foreign born. These differences are statistically significant.
In Table X a similar analysis is shown for only those patients
receiving electroshock.

Again, each of these factors

is related to duration

of hospitalization.
The same

results are obtained

psychotherapy only

is

when

the data of those patients receiving

While
XI.
shown
Table
in
as
analyzed separately,

F
low
have
Pollack
Dr.
scores, are
indicated,
as
these patients as a group,

electroshock
the
than
born
and
native
more
education
have
more
younger,

patients, there is

still

a significant difference within the group in the

the
time
in
hospital.
of
the
to
length
according
direction
predicted

�These same relationships of

social factors to hospitalization are

found even when the patients were subdivided according to

diagnosis. In Table XII the data is shown for the

in the hospital for each diagnostic group.

F

their final

score and months

The diagnoses were subdivided

into four major groups and include all but three patients in the population
studied. For each group there is a significant difference between those

in the hospital for the shortest and the longest periods, with those in
the longest having the lowest scores. Similar results are shown when the
data

is

analyzed

It is also

shown

for

each diagnostic group with respect to age (Table XIII).

for education (Table

schizophrenic patients

stay.

It

who were

who

XIV), with the exception of the

had about the same education

for each length of

should be noted, though, that many of the schizophrenic patients

here for ten months or more were quite young - around 16 or 17,

and so did not have the opportunity to receive education beyond the middle

of high school.
Analysis of place of

hospitalization is

shown

is associated with a

birth for
in Table

each diagnostic group and length of

XV.

marked decrease

Increase in length of hospitalization

in the

with the exception of the schizophrenics,

number

who

of foreign born, again

as a group, had very few such

persons.
The

previous tables have indicated that not only

is there

a significant

relation between each of the social factors studied and length of
hospitalization, but that there are large differences between the diagnostic
groups themselves, even when comparing patients with the same period of

hospitalization.
in Table

XVI.

The summary

It is

data comparing the diagnostic groups

is

shown

clear that patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis

�have the highest F scores, the

oldest ages, the least years of education,

highest incidence of foreign born. In contrast, the schizophrenics
have the lowest F scores, were the youngest, had the most education and the
and the

of foreign born. The manic-depressive and psychoneurotic
involutionals
the
to
closer
with
the
manic-depressive
between,
in
patients fell

least

number

like the schizophrenics.
relationship between these social factors

and the psychoneurotics most

This marked

and diagnosis

is not surprising. Certainly the relationship of age and diagnosis is an
established concept in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional disorders
and
What

names themselves have a chronological conndstion.

in dementia praecox the

is

unexpected, however,

is that

age should also be

related to the

and
that the
and
disorders,
psychoneurotic
of
manic-depressive
diagnosis
other social factors of education, place of birth and F score should

in
this hospital.
the
diagnostic
major
groups
differentiate
all
significantly
we have postulated two hypotheses to account for these relationships.
The first is based on the fact that persons from different social backgrounds
acquire different habitual
and expression.

modes

of adaptation and patterns of communication

Accordingly, under conditions of stress, damaged brain

function, or other etiological conditions associated with the onset of
mental illness, a person will show those behavior patterns or symptoms

his habitual patterns. Thus, a person from
background
communicate
in nonsverbal,
to
more
lower
apt
social
class
is
a
do
so in
to
more
while
class
people
likely
are
physical terms,
upper

which are of the same type as

ideational and verbal terms. Thus, anger

may be shown by

lower class

people by physical violence, while those from upper classes are more
and
Redlich
Hollingshead
exhortation
argument.
to
to
or
resort
likely

�-19-

have noted

that these differences

among

people of different classes lead

to different psychodynamic patterns in psychoanalytic terms. Thus, aggressive
and sexual behavior

behavior

variation

is

is restricted
among

more acceptable
among

to lower class parents, while such

the upper classes, lending to considerable

the different social classes in superego development.

Irish

Italian patients who were diagnosed
as schizophrenic in a V.A. Hospital, found significant differences in their
types of symptoms related to cultural differences in their family backgrounds.
Patients coming from Irish families in which active expression of emotions
Marvin Opler, studying

and

were frowned upon and with dominant over-protective mothers, were

passive,

compliant and withdrawn, and fearful of anything which might separate them
from the protection of the

hospital. Patients with Italian family backgrounds

that encouraged free expression of
showed

were

assaultive

and

emotion and were ruled by a dominant

destructive behavior, were difficult to

father,

manage and

rebellious against authority.
In a comparable study Miller and Swanson have also noted that

hospitalized schizophrenics exhibit significant social class difference

in symptomatology - lower class patients showing "motoric themes," while
middle class patients exhibit "conceptual or ruminative themes."
According to our hypothesis, then, we would expect

lower social levels would show symptoms

sensory or motor patterns.

Among

that persons

from

that are non-verbal, expressed in

such types of symptoms would be psychomotor

retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor, muteness, hysterical blindness or
paralysis. In this connection

it is noteworthy that hysterical

symptoms

have
been reported as
the army

far

men

more

frequent

among

enlisted

in

than

officers. In addition hysteria which was apparently so common in‘world.war
I was not nearly so notable in wbrld'war II, and, in fact, has been reported

�in the general population. This decrease, in our view, is
related to the general increase in educational level of the country as a
whole. If one finds a classical case of hysteria in New'York today, I

on the wane

Rican
be
immigrant
Puerto
the
in
likely
it
population who have the poorest socio-cultural background. (One cannot,
of course, ascribe the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom in sexual

will

understand that

matters;

has

it is

shown,

most

most

common

in

more

poorly educated people who, as Kinsey

are least inhibited sexually).

In the laboratories at Hillside Hospital the investigations of persons
with depressive psychoses have been more intensive.

we have

noted a

common

of
lack
characterized
hy
these
behavior
of
in
people,
premorbid
pattern
imagination, creativity and introspective capacity, and by conventionality
and general rigidity. Similar patterns have been noted in a series of

studies of such patients by other authors.
background, such as

that involving

little

we

or

believe that a poor cultural

no

education, spending early

and
cultural
is
environment,
meager
resources,
in
a
illiterate
largely
years
conducive to the development of such a personality pattern. When mentally
disordered, such persons tend to react with a repertoire of behavior patterns

consistent with their background which
A

we

second hypothesis concerning the

term depression.

relation of social factors to

and
between
do
the
with
has
interaction
patient
to
diagnosis
psychiatrist.

this hypothesis a diagnosis may not be based on an actual
how
of
the
reflection
extent
a
to
but
behavior
great
is
a
pattern,
objective
psychiatrist perceives or identifies the patient. It has been noted frequently
that patients with similar symptoms will be differently diagnosed and treated
depending on their social class. For example, we recently studied three

According to

patients

who were

admitted with similar symptoms of depression, anorexia and

�insomnia.
who was

All three were referred for convulsive therapy.

One woman,

62, born in Russia, of limited education with an F score of 70,

was diagnosed as

involutional melancholia.

this country, with

The second, aged hS, born

in

an F score of 53 and a high school education, was termed

manic-depressive, depressed. The third, aged hh, also born in this country,
with an F score of 33 and a college education, was diagnosed as psychoneurosis,

reactive depression.
In conclusion, in the Hillside Hospital population social factors of
age, education, birthplace and F score are significantly related to the

selection and results of treatment, length of hospitalization and diagnosis.
These findings

illustrate the

importance of social factors in affecting

language and communication patterns and the nature of the interaction

patient and therapist. Current data, both from our own laboratory
and as reported in the work of others, indicates that psychotherapy is most
likely to take place with those persons who most closely resemble the therapists

between

in terms of cultural background and communication pattern. In Hillside, with
its emphasis on psychotherapy, it is clear that patients who best meet this

criteria are also keptthe longest. This is true for either patients
receiving convulsive or psychotherapies alone, and for all diagnostic groups.
In the evaluation of clinical improvement there may well be different
expectancies towards patients in terms of these social factors.
with
may

little

In a person

education and different modes of expression than ourselves,

we

regard, for example, the manifestation of denial as improvement. But

in a patient

much

like ourselves in cultural background, the

denial will be regarded as a defense and the patient

is

showing of

considered unimproved.

patient,himself, may have different expectancies not only in terms of
the type of psychiatric treatment, but for what constitutes improvement as well.

The

�believe also that the attitude of the patient's family may be crucial
in both the patient's and therapist's conception of what constitutes

we

improvement.

relation between social factors and diagnosis was interpreted in
affects
background
cultural
one's
that
indicated
was
First
ways.
it
The

two

the type and

and
accordingly
and
communication,
of
expression
symbolic
pattern

the possible type of

symptoms

a diagnostic statement

behavior pattern.

patient

and

is not

Rather,

it

that will be

shown.

Secondly,

we

believe that

simply an objective evaluation of a given

is

a reflection of the interaction of the

psychiatrist in relation to their respective cultural backgrounds

and modes of communication.

It is

between
mind
the
while
relationship
that
in
to
keep
important

social factors and the psychiatric aspects described is probably applicable
as a generalized principle, the specific findings may vary in different
For example, in a study using the F score at the

settings or institutions.

Boston Psychopathic Hospital, the same relationship to type of treatment
was noted as

in our report,

i.e.,

the electroshock patients had higher

scores than those receiving psychotherapy.

patients there, however,
patients

is

was higher than

Since the average score of the

at Hillside, their psychotherapy

had the same mean score as our electroshock cases.

Another example

the finding of Hollingshead and Redlich that schizophrenia

common

diagnosis proportionately

among

F

was a more

lower than upper classes, while at

Hillside the schizophrenics had the highest education. This discrepancy
two
of
the
in
composition
the
variation
be
accounted
by
for
can probably
middle
from
drawn
the
largely
being
the
Hillside
patients
populations,
lower
classes.
social
few
from
the
or
with
upper
relatively
groups

�-23-

In Hillside the diagnosis of schizophrenia

may

indicate an "interesting"

same
diagnosis
the
population
while
State
Hospital
in
a
patient,

may

represent a "hopeless" patient.

It

be
tested
to
studies
these
by
raised
remains for the hypotheses

In
involved.
the
psychological
of
processes
studies
and for further
interaction.
communicative
of
studies
on
been
working
have
particular we
Some

Dr.

of the details

Jaffe.

and findings of

this

work

will next be presented by

�DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION AND TYPE OF TREATMENT

in Ho§ita1

Months

Treatment Grog-pa

1

-

5

6

-

9

10 or more

Electroshock (S?)

26%

30%

M453

Psychotherapy (102)

32%

he}!

25%

" 5.73
df " 2

(3112

p

-

N.S.

�-25TABLE

VIII

DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION AND DISCHARGE EVALUATION

Discharge Evaluation
Months

in

Hoggital

Recovered or
Much Iggroved

Improved or

raved
EM

1-5 (h9)

69%

31%

6-9

55%

15%

52%

148%

(624)

10 or

more (58)

Chi2

df

p

-

3-83
2

N.S.

�- 26..
TABLE IX

DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION AND F SCORE, AGE, EDUCATION
AND PLACE OF BIRTH

in Hogi‘bal

Months

91-192

-

9
{bl-6h}

10 or more

133.9

10.5

31.0

Mean
Age

145-5

32-5

27 .9

Years
Education

10.0

11.9

12.8

W

19%

10%

1

ean
F Score

M

Mean

5 Foreign Born

-

5

6

ski-582

�-27TABLE X

DURATION OF HDSPITALIZATION AND

F SCORE, AGE, EDUCATION

AND

PLACE OF BIRTH IN PATIENTS RECEIVING ELECTROSHOCK

Months

in Hogaital

-5
pm 52

6

Mean
F Score

58.2

h5.6

3h.9

Mean
Age

51.7

h2.2

32.1

6.5

12.3

13.2

67%

2h%

16%

1

Mean.Years

Education

%

Foreign

Born

-

9
551-172

10 or more
531-25 2

�DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION AND F SCORE, AGE, EDUCATION
AND PLACE OF BIRTH IN PATIENTS RECEIVING PSYCHOTHERAPY ONLY

in HogEital

Months
1

-

S

6

-

10 or more
gN-262

SN‘BB}

9
SN-hB!

Mean
F Score

h0.2

38.6

27.8

Mean
Age

[‘3 c 2

29 o 1

2,4 0 8

11.1;

11.7

12.1:

Mean Years

Education

%

Foreign

Born

30%

16%

8%

�W
TABLE

MEAN

F

XII

OF
DURATION
TO
ACCORDING
GROUPS
DIAGNOSTIC
SCORES FOR

HOSPITALIZATION

Months

Diagnostic

in Hoggital

3;;

L2;

58.2

50.9

35.0

Manic Depressive

h0.02

h6.1

33.1

Psychoneuroses

h0.05

36.6

36.1

Schizophrenia

36.3

38.5

27.6

Greg
Involutional Depression

10 or more

K

�-30TABLE

MEAN AGES FOR

XIII

DIAGNOSTIC GROUPS ACCORDING TO DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION

10 or more

Diggggstic Gregg

3L;§L

£1;;2_

Involutional Depression

58. 8

5h. 5

52. 3

Manic Depressive

h6.8

39.1

35.5

Psychoneuroses

141.0

27 .1

27.1

Schizophrenia

27.8

27.8

214. 1

�.31TABLE XIV

W

OF
DURATION
TO
ACCORDING
GROUPS
DIAGNOSTIC
FOR
EDUCATION
MEAN YEARS OF

HOSPITALIZATION

Months

in Hogaital
10 or more

1;;;§

51:113

7.1

9.6

16.0

11.0

11.7

12.3

Psychoneuroses

8.7

12.5

12.5

Schizophrenia

13.3

12.3

12.9

giggnostic Groggs

Involutional Dapression

Manic Depressive

�-3 2..
TABLE Lv

OF
DURATION
TO
ACCORDING
GROUPS
DIAGNOSTIC
BORN
FOR
FOREIGN
PERCENTAGE
HOSPITALIZATION

in Hogital

Months

Digestic

Grougs

_1__-_§

6

-

9

10

or more
0

Involutional Depression

57$

113%

Manic Depressive

39%

23%

0

Psychoneuroses

50%

19%

13%

Schizophrenia

10%

8%

12%

�TABLE XVI

DIAGNOSIS AND F SCORE. AGE: EDUCATION AND PLACE OF BIRTH

Dialysis
Involutional
Depression

Mean
F Score

'

Mean
Age

Mean Years

Education

%

Foreign

Born

{NI-21:2

Manic Depressive
(NI-322

Psycho-

' neuroses

Schizophrenia

(Iv-372

$31-68)

52.3

140.8

36.9

32.8

56.7

1:1.9

29.1;

26.1

8.9

11. 5

11. 9

12. 7

146%

26%

22%

10%

�-313-

Relationship:
Patient-Doctor
the
on
Effects of Social.Factors
Setting
Interview
Observations in an

illustrate
will
I
In this report

how

discussed
factors
the social

hypothesis
Our
interview.
clinical
the
in
ommunication
c
affect
morning
this
and
mmunicate,
can co

that this is

why

treatment.
results of psychiatric

and
choice
the
to
relevant
they are

One way

to test

would
hypothesis
such a

actual
an
in
events,
important
psychodynamically
that
he to demonstrate
such
as
age,
factors
to
related
significantly
are
setting,
interview

of
a
study
the
be
might
A
step
first
and.F
score.
education, nativity
communication
of
kind
the
of
representative
which
is
event,
defined
clearly
psychotherapy.
to
relevant
that is

The phenomenon

pattern.
communication
such
one
with
deals
This report
e—recording
tap
the
mentioned
explicitly
the
patient
no
whether
or
studied is
may bear upon
transaction
spontaneous
This
interview.
during an experimental
and
interviews
rimental
in
expe
develops
which
transference situation

t

the

well.
as
in psychotherapy
METHOD:

The

clinical

setting in

which the observations

we re made was an

initial

of
patients
edure
proc
screening
the
of
interview. This was part

interviews
All
hospital.
this
in
therapies
sive
convul
and
referred for drug
the
during
Psychiatry,
imental
Exper
of
Department
the
in
were performed
was
It
tests.
psychological
and
physiological
of
battery
week as a
to
asked
was
The
patient
and
patient.
doctor
the
of
the first meeting
was
procedure
unstructured
generally
and
a
about his difficulties,

tell

�.35followed. The purpose was to get an impression of the patient's communication

patterns,

and

to secure a tape recording of the interaction.

Several months ago,

that the interview

it was

noted that some patients mentioned the fact

was being tape—recorded, whereas

nothing about the procedure. Since that time,

recorded

this data at the conclusion of

I

other patients said

have

each session.

systematically
In addition, the

following experimental structure was purposely introduced.
A

Tanberg tape-recorder was prominently placed beside the desk

which the interview took place.

This instrument was turned on Just before

the patient entered the room, and was clearly in his line of vision.
was about

at

It

the level of the desk, at a distance of about seven feet from

the patient's chair. The red neon glow bulb, the revolving reels of tape,
and the operating noise of the machine could all be observed. An unconcealed
mire ran directly from the instrument, across the desk, to a microphone which
-

lay in clear view between doctor and patient. However, the interviewer
no mention of

by the

made

the recording set-up unless the subject was introduced verbally

patient.

OBSERV£IION33

Since

this experimental structure

have been recorded.
17

was

introduced, 31

initial

interviews

The

tape-recording was mentioned by 1h patients, while
others made no such observation. They will henceforth be referred to as

the "Mention" and

No

Mention" groups respectively.

a) Qualitative: The patients

variety of attitudes.

who

mentioned the recording expressed a

The most common was

curiosity, with inquiry as to the

purpose of the interview, and the use to which the recordings might be put.

�-36A

minority expressed overt suspicion, either refusing to proceed with the

interview for several minutes, or voicing their fears of humiliating or
incriminating uses which might be

did'nt

know

the room was bugged."

made
A

of the recordings.

One

patient said, "I

physician in this group of patients

requested that the recorder be turned off for a

moment so

that

he could ask a

question as a colleague, "off the record." After a spontaneous mention of the

to explore the attitude underlying the remark.

recording, an attempt was

made

This varied from definite

hostility

and suspicion, through mild objection and

uneasiness, to passive acceptance of the procedure. Only one patient expressed

delight, saying, "I'm glad this is being recorded,
In addition to these subjects

who

it's

like a confession."

explicitly mentioned the recording,

patient is included in the "Mention" group.
to the microphone, shook her head as

if

She

one mute

pointed to the recorder, then

to say "no," and covered her mouth

with her hand.

In the

"No

Mention" group, non-verbal recognition of the recording was

often apparent. Most of the patients looked repeatedly at the recorder and
microphone , sometimes
up

furtively. Several of

them

actually touched or picked

the microphone while speaking. I accompanied one patient back to the ward

following the interview, and while chatting in a lighter vein she asked
way, was

that all recorded?"

that the

ﬂNo-mention" group was aware of the recording.

"By

the

Thus there was considerable non-verbal evidence

Quantitative:
Quantitative data for the "Mention" and
Table-XVILIt

is apparent that the

group

"No—mention" groups

is seen in

explicitly remarked about the reabout 20 years. They were also better

who

cording were younger, on the average, by

educated, and with only a single exception were native born.

They had a lower

score on the F scale and I tended to spend more time with them. All the

differences between the groups are statistically significant;

�.37-

TABLE

MENTION

XVII

NO MENTION

53121:).

N=17)

26.7

h5.2

1h.1

p&lt;

.002

10.9

P&lt;:

~02

93

53

I&gt;&lt;:

.05

F SCORE

3h.1

11702

DURATION OF
INTERVIEW (minutes)

39.6

2900

AGE

(years)

EDUCATION
%

(years)

NATIVE BORN

p‘&lt;:’ .05

�DISCUSSION:

Using a

single objective index, 3:2. an overt statement about an

unexpected experimental procedure, two patterns emerge from

patients.

The group of

this

group of

subjects mentioning the recording have the

same

sociological characteristics as those patients from the total Hillside
Hospital population

are treated by psychotherapy alone. They are

who

less

younger, have some college education, are native born, and are

stereotyped in their attitudes. They mention the experimental procedure

in a challenging

way.

Gill,

Newman

and Redlich have described the anxiety-

producing effects of tape-recording psychiatric interviews. This group of

patients meet the stress by verbalization of their subjective reactions.
talk about it, ask questions, object, 222.
The group who do

not mention the recording have the

same

They

sociological

wharacteristics as those patients in the total Hillside Hospital population
who

are typically referred for electroshock

(i;g.

non-venaal therapy) or are

hospitalized for the shortest period. They are older, have at most a high
school education, are more likely to be foreign born, and are stereotyped

in their attitudes as measured by the

F

scale. These patients

the procedure overtly, although they notice
the doctor, whatever you

do

is justified

their compliance

and

what to say, but

I'll be glad to

it.

Their attitude

do

not question

is

"You

are

and should not be questioned."

In

vauiescence they resemble surgical patients who submit
themselves passively to treatment, neither resisting nor actively participating.
When asked to tell about themselves their attitude often is, "I don't know
The "Mention" group

They do

answer any questions you may ask."

display a different attitude toward the therapist.

not treat the physician's procedures as completely outside their

�-39-

verbalize their resistance, and express their negative
feelings directly to the interviewer. The "mention" reaction indicates

jurisdiction.

They

curiosity and the skepticism that Freud felt

was

required of the analytic

patient. In discussing this point, Fenichel notes, that if the patient
"is not skeptical at all, the suspicion is warranted that he is repressing
negative transferences."

It is

not surprising that the interviewer, with

a psychoanalytic orientation, spent about 10 minutes longer with the "mention"
group.

This study demonstrates, then, that these sociological factors

may

be

related to actual differences in the quality of patient-doctor relationship.
In this one limited aspect of the communication pattern, the sociological
background allows us to predict whether the

patient will verbalize his reactions

or not. If this single stress situation is representative of the general
behavior in psychotherapy,

we

can get some notion of why these

related to choice or length of treatment.

'we

factors are

expect that patients

who

decline to mention such an obvious situation as a microphone and tape-recorder,

will be equally loathe to express the variety of feelings about the therapist
which are crucial for analysis of transference.
Further studies of the data are in progress which may increase our
understanding of the observations reported. For example, a detailed content
analysis of the

way

in which the recording

deviant cases.

Two

of these have already been described.

patient, with high

F

score,

who

was mentioned sheds

light

upon the

One was an

older

in contrast to the usual pattern of such

persons, did mention the recording. Hewever, he differed from the other

older patients in having a medical education.

His way of mentioning the

�-h0

-

recording was to suggest a change in the interview from that of doctorpatient to that of colleagues speaking "off the record." One is tempted
to predict the form of his therapeutic resistances from this event. Another
patient mentioned the recording,but in an unusual way. She was delighted
with the "confessional" aspects. In her sociological characteristics, she
too did not fit a clear pattern, being in her 20's, but with a high F
score.

It is

to be noted that she was an ex-Catholic.

Other studies of the psychiatric interview, using experimental stresses
more characteristic of psychotherapy, furnish additional evidence of the
importance of sociological factors. For example, Saslow and Matarozzo

research on psychotherapeutic communication.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67454">
                <text>Max Pollack, Robert Kahn, and Joseph Jaffe: Social Factors and Communication in Psychiatric Patients (research), 1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67455">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67456">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-11-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67457">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67458">
                <text>Pollack, Max; Kahn, Robert L.; Jaffe, Joseph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67459">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67460">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67461">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence: research with Joseph Jaffe, Robert L. Kahn, and Max Pollack</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67462">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67463">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80948">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87509">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94070">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100631">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="281" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="72">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/1e8c795fb4f587faa06c7827a2d53d1f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8dbcc77f9a018fd443642f4f0191daf3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100698">
                    <text>\Lz.

MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS BY ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION

J.

JAFFE, M.D., H. ESECOVER, M.D., R. L. KAHN,
and M., FINK, M.D.
Glen Oaks, N. Y.

PHD.

This report is derived from a supervisory seminar in which the
effects of convulsive treatment upon psychotherapeutic transactions
were studied. The therapist’s observations have been described in
a previous publication (1) . The present paper describes the process
from the frame of reference of the supervisor and supervisory group.
It is intended as a complementary set of observations of this combined therapy. In addition, concurrent neurophysiologic data are
included, of which both therapist and supervisor were unaware.
This additional frame of reference may broaden the understanding
of certain phenomena in the patient-therapist, and therapist-supervisor interactions. Our purpose is to demonstrate that the introduction of a measurable physiologic variable is a useful method for the
investigation of the psychotherapeutic process.
The histories of the patients under study were given in the
above-mentioned publication (1). In the following report, a detailed analysis of one of the cases" discussed in that paper is presented as most illustrative of the modiﬁcation of interpersonal
transactions by altered brain function. The patient, a 44—year-old
widow and mother of a 12-year-old son, had been admitted to the
hospital with symptoms of depression, anxiety, anorexia, varied
physical complaints, and feelings of unreality and isolation. In
her psychotherapeutic sessions she would reiterate her difﬁculties
in a complaining pattern, repetitiously illustrating her inadequacy.
During a three-month-period no improvement occurred and a course
of electroshock therapy was recommended. At this juncture the
patient was included in the present study.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry (56151) and grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.
The assistance of Miss Esther Sanders and Mrs. Anita Bellow, who participated actively in the seminars, is gratefully acknowledged.
:

*

Case

#3, G.

C.

46

Reprinted from

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, Vol.
pages 46—55. January, 1961.

XV, No. 1,

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

47

The setting was a weekly multi-disciplinary supervisory conference. Included in the group were: (a) the therapist (H.E.),
(at the time a senior resident in psychiatry), who presented the case
material; (b) a social worker who reported the response of the
patient’s family; (c) a psychoanalyst (J .J .), Who dealt mainly
with the didactic aspects of psychotherapeutic technique; (d) a
psychologist (R.K.), who studied the cases independently; and (e)
a neuropsychiatrist (M.F.), who coordinated the discussion. The
last two members were aware of the concomitant changes in physiologic measures, and although this information inﬂuenced their
questions, the data were not introduced at these conferences. The
actual somatic treatment was performed by a physician who was
not a participant at the meetings.
The procedure was informal, with the therapist taking the lead
in presenting his verbatim notes of the psychotherapeutic sessions.
The order of the case reports and the amount of time devoted to
each was not prescribed. Following the spontaneous case presentation, more directive questioning was introduced, aimed at clarifying and relating the information presented by therapist and social
worker.
Observations made during the period of somatic therapy are depicted in the accompanying chart. During the 94 days of supervision, two different forms of somatic treatment were utilized. This
procedure was part of a hospital-wide convulsive-subconvulsive control study then in progress, in which therapists were unaware of the
introduction of subconvulsive phases of treatment.
.
For the ﬁrst treatment period (27 days) the patient received
subconvulsive electro-stimulation with pentothal premedication.
Twelve such treatments were given at the rate of three per week.
No changes in the quantitative measures of EEG slow wave activity
(2) were manifest during this time. This period served to establish a baseline for the behavioral observations and the expectancies
of the staff.
In the second treatment period (29th to 59th day), grand mal
convulsions were induced three times weekly for a total of 14 treatments. In that period, minimal degrees of EEG change were recorded on the 37th day, and moderate degrees were shown on three
subsequent recordings. Twelve days after the termination of convulsive therapy, EEG slow wave activity was considerably diminished. This information was not available tothe therapist or the
supervisor until after the conclusion of the study.

�‘

arr-ﬁr».

48

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
EFFECT OF CHANGING BRAIN FUNCTION
ON PSYCHOTHERAPY
SUPERVISORS
REPORT OF

DISCOURAGEMEHT.

AVOIDINCE

FRUSTRATION.
EXHORTATION

APlST'S ATTITUDE
TNEFMPIST'S REPORT

'SLIGNT

CHANGE'

(MINIMIZEDI

DEPRESSED. couPanmG.
SELF—REPROACHFUL,

OF FATIENT'S

A" ITUDE

HELPLESS,

HEW COMPLAINTS
PARTICIPATION IN

ACTIVITIES

I I

mnznlon
}
DEPRESSION

I

I

"ORE COMFORTABLE,
EASIER TO RELATE.
POSITIVE FEELINGS

CAUTIOUS,
SOLICITOUS

CHEERFUL, PRIMPING,

SELF-

CONVERSATIONALJRUSTING.
AFFECTIONATE. ADULATING

I
I

I

I

“APPRAISAL.
SUPPORTIVE,
DETACHED

ASSERTIVE.
OBJECTIVE. INDEPENDENT;
ANXIOUS

I I

ANXIOUS

.. .—

I __

__

20~
PAGES

nous
Unaware
5553101:

m

10'

0

WW

.........

26EE 6

". nu: nun)
scum

TREATMENT

°"""°°""‘
I-COWULSIVE

n'0-

:—

-

_-..

B_|—|_I____J__J_l—J_L_'.l—L—L——L—J—-l——I—-—J___
85 70 75 80
55

0

5

DAYS

l0

[5

20

FROM

60
40 45 50
ONSET OF SOMATIC THERAPY
25

30

35

The patient was seen in psychotherapeutic sessions three times
weekly throughout her hospitalization. While the therapist was
he
somatic
was unaware that
of
treatment,
the
concurrent
aware
subconvulsive stimulation was given initially, and of the change to
convulsive therapy on the 29th day.
Changes in the patient-therapist relationship as reported in the
supervisory meetings are summarized in the chart and are detailed
below.

Supervisors’ Notes
Ist to 19th day: During the ﬁrst three weeks the therapist did
not discuss this patient in the supervisory group. Other patients
occupied the allotted time, in spite of a resolution to consider each
patient weekly.
In retrospect, the failure to report this patient’s progress canstituted a pattern of avoidance. Somatic therapy had not modified
the patient ’3 ward behavior or the doctor-patient relationship. Both
were the same as in the initial months of hospitalization. The neurophysiologic indices were unchanged.
20th to 33rd day: The case history was ﬁrst presented in the
meeting on the 20th day. The therapist reported no alteration in

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

4:9

the patient ’3 clinging, whining, helpless attitude throughout the
preceding three months. Efforts to explore her problems in living
were blocked by physical complaints and by recitals of guilt, selfreproach, and feelings of failure. He was left little opening for
comment.

In the three supervisory meetings during this period the group

atmosphere was one of discouragement whenever this case was presented. The therapist reported impulses to exhort the patient to
participate in ward activities, and reacted to her professions of helplessness with the feeling that “she wasn’t trying.”
The family reported that the patient considered her doctor “too
young,” reﬂecting her attitude of reproach toward those who were
unable to help her. He, in turn, felt that she was “throwing up
her hands and giving up.”
The therapeutic impasse was empathically communicated to the
group by the case report. The transactions during this period were
typically those leading to referral of depressed patients for somatic
(i.e., nan-verbal) treatment. They may be characterized as follows.
Verbal methods of therapy are incompatible with the affective mode
of communication adopted by such patients (3'). The doctor’s
efforts to help are not met by a collaborative response, and he feels
frustrated. The insatiable quality of the patient’s demands also
calls forth defensive reactions in the therapist.
During this period the mode of somatic treatment was changed
from subconvulsive to convulsive. The clinical status and therapeutic relationship, however, continued unaltered. Perhaps the lack
of the expected response of somatic treatment contributed to the
therapist’s discouragement. He assumed that convulsions had been
induced from the outset, and his past experience had led him to
anticipate a clinical response by the fourth week of treatment (2).
34th to 42nd day: In the meeting that took place on the 38th
day, a “slight change” was reported. Although the patient was
still “crying, ranting, raving” in therapy sessions, it was also noted
that “she participates in activities a little bit more, but not much.”
The therapist and the group discounted this change in social relationships. The ﬁrst spontaneous complaint of memory difﬁculty
was also reported.
The ﬁrst evidence of neurophysiologic change appeared at this
time. The EEG taken the day prior to this meeting showed a signiﬁcant increase in slow wave activity.

�50

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY

43rd to 63rd day: In the meeting on the 45th day the therapist
reported a full psychotherapeutic session for the ﬁrst time. He described the patient as “brighter,” “with a little more rouge and
lipstick” and “smiling.” Two days later her mood was noted as
“euphoric.” Physical complaints ceased and were replaced by complaints of forgetting. The therapist described this as a “cessation
of complaining.” Concomitantly, the affective mode of expression
was replace-d by a more intellectualized pattern. Instead of stating
“I have to cling to my mother,” the patient said “I’m dependent
on my mother for many things.” This was described as “talking
about her dependency in a different way.” Another change in
communication pattern evoked ‘ ‘uncanny’ ’ feelings in the therapist.
He stated that the patient “mentions things we had talked about as
if it were new information.” With these changes, there was a concomitant increase in the patient ’s sociability and participation in
hospital activities, and a diminution of her clinging to the family
and therapist. The supervisory group atmosphere also changed—
from one of hopelessness to well-being, with increased joking, smiling, and animated participation.
On the 52nd day the therapist reported that the patient dressed
seductively and applied fresh make-up for her sessions. She expressed feelings of trust and enjoyment of the meetings. The doctor
experienced similar emotions, and was eager to report the progress
of this patient. She was now “upset” because she couldn’t recall
her problems, and the therapist noted that he was inclined to a
directive “remembering” role. She complained of memory loss and
attempted to relate in a friendly, realistically gratifying way to
prevent further psychologic exploration.
A greater detachment from her family was expressed. Social improvement continued. The family stated that she no longer considered the doctor “too young,” but rather a “guiding angel.”
The abrupt, gross change in the clinical picture paralleled the
development of maximum physiologic change. The three EEG- records during this period showed a moderate degree of slow- wave
activity. The advent of positive feelings elicited reciprocal emotions in the therapist which were cammunicated in the supervisory
sessions. The aﬂect was empathically reﬂected in members of the
conference group. (The clinical picture resembled that of a “transference cure.” )
It is of interest that a change from “ physical” to “memory”

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

51

complaints was described as a “cessation of complaining.” Perhaps
the memory deﬁcit, an expected concomitant of convulsive therapy,
is more acceptable to the staff because it is understandable. They
feel a responsibility for this symptom and can authoritatively reassure the patient that it will be transient. An aﬁectionate dependency may also be more tolerable than a hostile one, especially when
accompanied by gratifying social improvement. The language
changes are indicative of a more detached, intellectualized cammunication of familiar content (4). The patient now “talked about”
rather than emoting or “acting out.” This new language pattern
was more in keeping with her background of college education, and
the therapist’s implicit expectations (5‘). In contrast to her prior
mode of communication it seemed to be more compatible with a psychoanalytioally-oriented approach. The concomitant development
of memory diﬁiculty, however, perpetuated the essentially non-insightful therapeutic situation.
64th to 72nd day: This period followed the termination of somatic treatment. The patient reported a “sudden feeling of selfawareness.” Euphoria and memory difﬁculty were no longer Observed, and an anxious state supervened. Psychotherapeutic sessions were characterized by more critical appraisal of her life
situation. For the ﬁrst time the doctor gave the patient extra time
in the sessions. The group voiced some concern that she was “slipping back.” When the patient occasionally talked positively about
career, emancipation from mother, and so forth, the therapist felt
called upon to respond optimistically, rather than to explore. There
was a revival of Old complaints.
At this point, the supervisor and therapist reviewed a tape-res
corded therapy session. A recurrence of the earlier verbal patterns
could indeed be identiﬁed. However, these occurred in circumscribed fashion rather than throughout the interview. The events
antecedent tO such periods were examined and the adaptive nature
of the recurrent affective patterns became apparent.
The EEG record during this period showed a considerable decrease in slow wave activity. There was a concomitant reestablishment of some of the communication patterns which preceded the
period of altered brain function. The conference group responded
with anxiety, reﬂected in the solicitousness of the therapist in prolonging the sessions.
The phenomenon observed in the supervisory group, for lack of

�52

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY

Statedependency.”
“electroshock
be
called
better
term, may
a
ments were made in the meeting such as “she’s slipping back,”
“needs more treatments” and “improvement not holding up.’
These statements imply that the hostile- dependent pattern was being
rather
depression,”
“a
nosologic
entity,
as
a
thought of primarily
than a mode of human relatedness. Perhaps because behavioral
it
now
alone,
means
psychologic
been
by
effected
had
not
change
seemed totally dependent upon the alteration in cerebral function.
The change in interaction was conceptualized as the result of the
brain syndrome, and not as a function of the doctor-patient relationship. Hence the group’s uneasiness on the sporadic reappearance of preconvulsive patterns. The detailed examination of a taperecorded session revealed the adaptive function of this more circumscribed occurrence of the complaints, and the phenomenon of
“electroshock dependency” was not observed in subsequent group
meetings.
73rd to 94th day: During this period a more stable psychotheraindebecame
The
more
patient
apparent.
was
relationship
peutic
assertiveselfand
of
compliance
discussed
problems
and
pendent
ness. Although her attitude remained positive and collaborative,
her adulation of the therapist diminished. In one session she said
She
was
at
you.”
I
unless
won’t
better
get
I
angry
get
“Maybe
less elated. She moved from the closed ward to an open cottage,
and began to work in the hospital library. Occasional episodes of
overt disturbance were treated by the therapist without solicitude.
His attitude was one of interest, support and detachment. They
discussed plans for discharge and outpatient treatment.
Subsidence of the changes in brain function resulting from convulsive therapy permitted a new integration of the doctor-patient
relationship. The pattern of a conventional psychotherapeutic
situation appeared, which differed both from the original negative
and the artiﬁcially induced positive relationships.

Therapist’s Notes as an Index of Relatedness
Following the conclusion of the study, another index of the psydescribed
Rioch
has
investigated.
was
relationship
chotherapeutic
staﬁof
index
notes
staff
of
as
an
volume
of
the
the use
progress
in
his
notes
a
had
The
kept
therapist
interaction
(6).
patient
standard stenographic notebook throughout the treatment. A gross
count of the number of pages of notes per session was made, and

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

53

is represented graphically on the chart. No written notes were
taken during occasional tape-recorded sessions, and these are omitted
from the chart. The change in the relationship is apparent from

the abrupt and persistent increase in note-taking from the 44th
day. This coincided with the ﬁrst gross change in the electroencephalogram. The notes taken by the two other psychiatrists in
the supervisory meetings followed a similar pattern (not illustrated), although with peaks of note-taking at the onset and again
at the waning of induced neurophysiologic change.
DISCUSSION

This report describes an investigation of psychotherapy when
somatic therapy is introduced as an adjunctive procedure. One
difﬁculty in the objective study of psychotherapeutic transactions
is the absence of a quantiﬁable and controllable variable. Adjunctive therapies, somatic and pharmacologic, provide such a variable.
They produce alteration in behavior as well as measurable neurophysiologic changes (2, 7). This opportunity has been utilized in
the present project. For example, one mode of adaptation to
altered brain function is a euphoric type of relatedness (8). The
occurrence of the phenomenon in this case permitted us to observe
how induced alternation of positive and negative attitudes call forth
similar attitudes in therapist and supervisor. Another illustration
was the discounting of the earliest clinical change during the 34th to
42nd day of treatment. The electroencephalogram indicated the
signiﬁcance of this beginning change in the relationship. The fact
that it was minimized demonstrates the obscuring effects of stalf expectancies. Finally, the alteration of brain function was accompanied by a change in complaint pattern, that is, from physical
symptoms to memory difﬁculty. This resulted in a new form of
the dependency relationship (43rd to 63rd day) which was experienced differently by the supervisory staff, with resultant change in
their feelings about the patient. This effect was also observed in
the patient ’s family group.
The observations also illustrate a phenomenon peculiar to supervision in group settings. We have called attention to the emotional
atmosphere of the group, which seemed to ﬂuctuate in accordance
with the therapeutic relationship being described. Hora (9) suggests that the supervisee may communicate the affective aspects of
his experience with the patient non-verbally in the supervisory meet-

�54

AMERICAN JOURNAL

or

PSYCHOTHERAPY

ing. His formulation is that “The supervisee unconsciously identiﬁes with the patient and involuntarily behaves in such a manner
as to elicit in the supervisor those very emotions which he himself
experiences while working with the patient, but was unable to convey verbally.” He also describes the diﬂusion of this affect in the
other participants of a supervisory seminar. Thus he reports that
“This observation has been subjected to repeated tests in seminars
where it was possible to verify the supervisor’s emotional perceptions by matching them with the emotional reactions of the other
participants present.” Our work supports such observations and
suggests the potential fruitfulness of studies of group dynamics
in supervisory seminars.
We have noted one change in relatedness resulting from the
somatic therapy that had a disjunctive effect upon the relationship
(45th day). The patient mentioned familiar topics “as if it were
new information.” The “uncanny” quality produced in the therapist and supervisor resulted from the temporary feeling that the
therapeutic relationship had no history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a great extent upon an accumulated body of
shared information. Both doctor and patient take this for granted,
and the inability to rely upon it may affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study, not discussed in this paper, showed
different patterns of response. These included transient paranoid
episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic, and other forms of
“acting-out” which were disruptive to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced behavioral change was related
to the personality of the individual patient and occurred at the
time of changing brain function (2). Also in each case there were
concomitant changes in behavior in the supervisory group.
Our experience also highlights some of the diﬂiculties that may
develop when the two modes of treatment are used concurrently.
Intensive psychotherapy is based upon the conviction of the eﬂicacy
of verbal communication for improvement of the patient ’s adaptation. In the case reported, a trial period of psychotherapy had been
ineffective in altering clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic treatment represented a decision against exclusive reliance
upon interpersonal communication as the therapeutic instrument.
When cerebral change was maximal, a “social recovery” occurred,
apparently unrelated to interpretation of psychodynamic factors.
When the induced neurophysiologic changes subsided, a recurrence

�[MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

'

55

of earlier communication patterns led the therapist to doubt that
the improvement could be perpetuated by interpersonal means
alone. To some extent this phenomenon was an expression of differing conceptual and linguistic systems inherent in the two modes
of therapy. It is related to the philosophical dichotomy described
by Hollingshead and Redlich (10) between practitioners using
somatic and analytically-oriented therapies.
SUMMARY

A study of concurrent somatic therapy and psychotherapy is
reported, in which simultaneous observations of serial changes in
brain function, the psychotherapeutic relationship and social adaptations were made. The observations in a group supervisory seminar reﬂected the pattern of neurophysiologic alteration.
It is concluded that the introduction of a measurable physiologic
variable is a useful method for investigation of interpersonal relationships.
1.
2.

3.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Eseeover, H., Jaffe, J. and Kahn, R. L.: Psychotherapeutic Techniques
with Electroshock Patients. J. Hillside Hosp, 7: 17, 1958.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
Resp0nse in Electroshock. Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 78: 516, 1957.
Cohen, M. 8., Baker, G., Cohen, R. A., Fromm-Reichmann, F., and Weigert,
E.: An Intensive Study of Twelve Cases of Manic-Depressive Psychosis. Psychiatry, 17: 103, 1954.
Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock
Therapy. In Psychopathology of Communication, P. Hoch and J.
Zubin, Eds., Grune &amp; Stratton, 1958.
Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital. A.M.A. Arch.
Gen. Psychiat, 1: 565, 1959.
Rioch, D. McK.: Research in Psychiatry: Certain Problems and Developments in Multi-Disciplinary Studies. T. W. Salmon Lecture, New York
'

4.

5.

6.

Academy of Medicine, 1957.
7. Fink, M.: A Uniﬁed Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies.
J. Hillside Hosp, 6: 197, 1957.
8. Fink, M., Kahn, R. L. and Green, M.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. Dis Nero. Sys., 19: 113, 1958.
9. Hora, T.: Phenomenology of the Supervisory Process. Am. J. Psychother.,
11: 769, 1957.
10. Hollingshead, A. B. and Redlich, F. 0.: Social Class and Mental Illness.
J. Wiley &amp; Son, New York, 1958.

��Modification of Psychotherapeutic and Supervisory
Relationships by Altered Brain Function

J. Jaffe,

M.D., B. Esecover, M.D.
R.L. Kahn, Ph.D. a M. Fink, M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
From

Aided, in part, by the Foundations' Fund for Research in
Psychiatry (56-151) and grant M-927 of the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health

Service.

assistance of Miss Esther Sanders and Mrs. Anita Bellow,
caseworkers in the Department of Social Services, who participated
actively in the seminars, is gratefully acknowledged.
The

VII: 11-15-58

�Modification of Psychotherapeutic and Supervisory
Relationships by Altered Brain Function
seminar
from
a
supervisory
derived
is
psychotreatment
upon
convulsive
of
which
the
effects
in
The
studied.
therapist's
were
communication
therapeutic
observations have been described in a previous publication
(2), and are based mainly upon his personal experiences
with the patients. The present paper describes the process
intended
as
is
of
frame
reference.
It
from the supervisor;s
combined
complex
of
this
observations
of
a complementary set
data
is
neurophysiologic
concurrent
In
addition,
therapy.
unaware.
were
and
supervisor
both
which
of
therapist
included,
This additional level of observation seems to account for
and
the
in
patient-therapist,
certain clinical phenomena
This report

therapist-supervisor interactions.
Our purpose is to demonstrate that the introduction
method
a
useful
is
variables
of measurable physiological
for the investigation of the psychotherapy process.

�METHOD:

setting was a weekly multi-disciplinary conference
composed of five people, and thus departed from the conventional
supervisory situation. The group included: a) the therapist
(H.E.), at the time a senior resident in psychiatry, who
presented the case material; b) a social worker assigned to
The

the cases selected for study, who reported the on-going
response of the patient's family; c) a psychoanalyst (J.J.),
who dealt mainly with the didactic aspects of psychotherapeutic
technique; d) a psychologist (R.L.K.), who had studied the
cases independently; and e) a neuropsychiatrist (M.F.), who
coordinated the discussion. The last two members were aware
of concomitant changes in the physiologic measures, and although

this information influenced their questions, the data was not
introduced at these conferences. The actual somatic treatment
was performed by a physician who was not a participant at the
meetings.
procedure was informal. The therapist took the lead
in presenting verbatim notes of his psychotherapy sessions
with five patients receiving combined therapy. The order of
The

the case presentations and the amount of time devoted to each
was not prescribed. Following the spontaneous case reports,

directive questioning was introduced, aimed at clarifying
and relating the information presented by the therapist and the
social worker. Although roles were defined, the atmosphere was
one of inquiry in which no participant claimed a definitive
answer to the problem under investigation.
more

.

�m

SUBJECT:

case histories of the subjects of this study were
In
a
this
(2).
report
in
a
publication
previous
reported
most
#3
as
Case
clearly
of
is
presented
detailed analysis
illustrative of the modification of interpersonal transactions
The

widow
old
year
by
patient,
and mother of a 12 year old son, had been admitted to the
hospital because of depression, anxiety, anorexia, multiple
somatic complaints, and feelings of being "unreal" and isolated.
In therapeutic sessions she would reiterate her difficulties
'in a persistent complaining pattern, as illustrations of her

altered brain function.

This

a hh

After a three month period of
psychotherapy without alteration in the clinical condition it
was decided co utilize a course of electroshock therapy. At
this time the patient was included in the present project.
More detailed description of the psychotherapy sessions is
included under "Observations" below.

failures

and inadequacies.

SOMATIC THERAPY:

during the intercurrent somatic
therapy are depicted in the accompanying chart. During the
9b days of supervision two different forms of somatic treatment

'Serial observations

made

This procedure was part of a convulsivesubconvulsive control study then in progress, in which the
therqmd.was unaware of the introduction of the subconvulsive

were

utilized.

phase of treatment.

�-hFor the

first

period the patient received subconvulsive
electrostimulation with pentothal premedicaticn. Twelve such
treatments were given at the rate of three per week. No
manifest changes in quantitative analyses of the degree of
the
EEG (3) were observed during this time:
in
delta activity
This period established a baseline for the behavioral observations and the staff eXpectancies.
Grand mal convulsions were induced from the 29th to the
59th days of somatic treatment, also at a rate of three per
week for a total of 1h treatments. In this convulsive period,
minimal degrees of electroencephalographic delta activity
appeared on the 37th day, and moderate degrees were shown on
three subsequent recordings. On a follow-up record 12 days
after the termination of convulsive therapy the delta activity
had decreased considerably. This information was not available
to the therapist or the supervisor until after the conclusion
of the study.
The patient was seen in psychotherapy sessions three times
a week throughout her hospitalization. While the therapist
was aware of the concurrent somatic treatment, he was unaware
of the fact that subconvulsive stimulation was given initially,
and of the change to convulsive therapy on the 29th day.
The changes in patient-therapist relationship as reported
in the supervisory meetings is summarized in the chart and
is detailed in the following observations.
-~‘ -------Figure I
27 day

�OBSERVATIONS:

let to

19th day:
During the first three weeks of somatic treatment
the therapist did not discuss this patient in the supervisory
in
the
time,
allotted
occupied
Other
all
patients
group.
the
in
about
hear
to
patient
every
of
resolution
our
spite

study each week. The case histories presented during this
time were those of patients undergoing gross day-to-day
changes in clinical behavior.
Comment:

retrospect, we consider the omitted presentation
A
communication.
pattenlof avoidance
to be a significant
characterized this period. The neurophysiologic
indices during this time were unchanged. Similarly,
the patient's clinical status and the doctor-patient
months
the
three
in
same
the
as
were
relationship
In

preceding somatic treatment.
20th to 33rd day:
The case history was first presented in the meeting on
the 20th day. Over a three month period the psychotherapeutic
unable
to
the
being
been
had
unchanged,
therapist
relationship
discern any alteration in the patient's clinging, whining,
in
her
living
problems
to
explore
Efforts
attitude.
helpless
of
and
by
long
recitals
complaints
blocked
by
were
physical
In
three
the
of
and
failure.
feelings
self—reproach,
guilt,

supervisory meetings during this period the group atmosphere

�-6was one of discouragement when

this case

presented. The
therapist reported impulses to exhort the patient to
participate in ward activities, and reacted to her professions
of helplessness with the subjective feeling that "she was'nt
trying." The reproach against those who were unable to help
her was reflected in the family's report that the patient
considered her therapist "too young."
was

Comment:

therapeutic impasse was empathically
communicated to the group by the therapist's report.
The interaction during this period may be characterized as follows: After prolonged, unsuccessful
efforts at verbal communication the psychotherapist
is realistically frustrated (I). The affective mode
The

patient rendered
essentially verbal techniques useless. The doctor's
efforts to help were not met by a collaborative
response, while the insatiable quality of the patient's
demands may also have called forth defensive
reactions in the therapist. Such interactions are
typically those that lead to the referral of psychotically depressed patients for somatic, 3,3. nonof communication adopted by the

verbal forms of therapy.
During this period the mode of somatic treatment
was changed from subconvulsive to convulsive. The

clinical status

and

therapeutic relationship however,

�-7continued unaltered. Perhaps lack of the expected
response to somatic treatment contributed to the
therapist's discouragement. He assumed that
convulsive therapy had begun at the outset, and
his past experience had led him to anticipate a
clinical response by the fourth week of treatment (3).
Bhth to h2nd day:
In the meeting that took place on the 38th day, a

"slight change"

reported. Although the patient was
described as still "crying, ranting, and raving“ in therapy
sessions, it was reported that "she participates in activities
a

little bit

was

more, but not much."

The

therapist

and the

tended
to minimize the social improvement. The first
group
spontaneous complaint of memory difficulty was also reported
in this meeting.
Comment:

retrospect, the first evidence of neurophysiologic change had appeared at this time. The
electroencephalogram on the day prior to this meeting
showed a significant increase in delta activity. The
In

group discounted the concomitant observation of

clinical

change in view of a

persistent hostile-

dependent transference, and negative counter-

transference feelings.

�23rd to 63rd day:
In the meeting on the hSth day the

therapist

spontaneously reported a full verbatim psychotherapy session
for the first time. The patient was described as "brighter,"
"with a little more rouge and lipstick," and "smiling."
Within the next two days he described her mood as ”euphoric.”
Physical complaints ceased and were replaced by complaints

of forgetting. The therapist, however, described this change
as a cessation of "complaining." There was a change in the
form of verbal expression although the content remained the
same. Her affective mode of expression was replaced by an

intellectualized pattern.

For example, instead of complaining
mother" the patient said, "I'm

"I have to cling to my
dependent on my mother for many things." The therapist
described this change as "talking about her dependency in a
different way." Another of his observations, however, was
reported with "uncanny" feelings which were shared by the
supervisor. He stated that the patient "mentions things we
had talked about as if it were new information."
With these changes, there was a concomitant increase in her

sociability

participation in hospital activities, and a
diminution of her overt dependency upon family and therapist.
The supervisory group atmosphere at this time changed from one
of discouragement to a feeling of well-being, with increased
Joking, smiling and animated participation.
and

�-9the 52nd day the therapist reported that the
patient dressed seductively and applied fresh make-up for her
therapy meetings. She expressed feelings of trust and enjoyment
of the sessions. The doctor experienced similar emotions, and
was eager to report the progress of this case. The patient
was now "upset" because she could'nt remember her problems,
and the therapist noted that he was being continually led into
a directive "remembering" role. He felt the patient used her
memory loss as a defense against further psychologic exploration,
and that she preferred to maintain the relationship on a
0n

friendly, realistically gratifying level.
A greater detachment from her family was also expressed.
Indicaﬁma of social improvement were prominent. The family'
stated that she no longer considered the doctor "too young,"
but rather a "guiding angel."
Comment:

abrupt and gross change in the clinical
picture paralleled the development of maximum
physiological change in this case. The three
electroencephalograms during this period showed
a moderate degree of delta activity.
The advent of markedly positive feelings
elicited reciprocal emotions in the therapist.
These were communicated in the supervisory sessions,
and were empathically reflected in members of the
conference group. The clinical pattern resembled
that of a "transference cure."
The

�-10-

It is

of

interest that

change from "physical"

to "memory" complaints was described as an overall
"decrease in complaining." Perhaps a memory deficit,

expected concomitant of convulsive therapy, was
;MOre acceptable to the staff because it was understandable. They felt some responsibility for this
Syphon and could authoritatively reassure the
patient that it would be transient. It is also
probable that an affectionate dependency is more
tolerable than a hostile dependency, especially
when accompanied by obvious and gratifying social
an

improvement.
The language changes were

indicative of a more
detached, intellectualized'communication of familiar
content (8). The patient at this time "talked
about“ rather than emoting or "acting out." These
new language patterns were consistent with her
college education and, in contrast to her prior
mode

of communication, appeared to be more compatible

with a psychoanalytically-oriented approach. However,
there was the concomitant development of memory
difficulty, exemplified by her introduction of
previously discussed topics as new information.
The

ne.t effect

thus a non-communicative
situation with regard to interpretive insight
therapy.
was

�-116hth to 72nd day:
This period followed the termination of somatic

treatment. The patient reported a "sudden feeling of selfmemory
The
awareness."
euphoria and
difficulty were no
longer observed, and an anxious state supervened. The content
of the psychotherapy sessions changed to a more critical
appraisal of her life situation. For the first time the
therapist gave the patient extra time in the sessions. The
group voiced some concern that she'was "slipping back." When
the patient occasionally talked positively about such problems
as her emancipation from mother, the therapist was inclined
to respond optimistically, rather than to explore. She reacted
to this with a revival of old complaints.
At this point, supervisor and therapist reviewed a tape
recorded therapy session. A recurrence of the earlier pattern
could indeed be identified, although in circumscribed fashion
rather than throughout the interview. It was possible to
examine the antecedent events in the session and to clarify
the pattern as an adaptive response to stressful content.
Comment:

electroencephalogram during this period
showed a considerable decrease in slow wave activity.
There was a concomitant reestablishment of some of
the communication patterns which preceded the
The

period of altered cerebral function.
group responded with uneasiness which

The

supervisory

was

reflected

�.12in the solicitousness of the therapist in
prolonging the sessions.
At this point a phenomenon was observed in
the supervisory group which, for lack of a better
term, may be called "electroshock dependency."
Statements were made in the meeting such as,
"she's slipping back," "needs more treatments,"
and "improvement not holding up." These statements
imply that the hostile-dependent pattern constituted
a nosologic entity - ”a depression" - rather than

relatedness. Perhaps because
therapeutic change could not be a effected by
interpersonal means alone, its persistence seemed
dependent upon the alteration in cerebral function.
The change in interaction was thus being conceptuala mode of human

ized as the result of the brain syndrome, and not as
a function of the doctor-patient relationship.
Hence the group's uneasiness on the sporadic
reappearance of the pre-convulsive interaction
pattern. The detailed examination of a tape-recorded
session revealed the adaptive function of this more
circumscribed occurrence of the complaints, and the
phenomenon of "electroshock dependency" was not
observed in subsequent group meetings.

�-13.
23rd to 9hth daz:

During

relaionship

this period

stable psychotherapeutic
patient became more independent

a more

apparent. The
and discussed problems of compliance and self-assertiveness.
Although her attitude remained positive and collaborative,
her gross adulation of the therapist diminished. In one
session she said, "Maybe I won't get better unless I get
angry

was

at you.“

She was

less elated.

She moved from a

closed

ward to an open

cottage, and began to work in the hospital
library. Occasional episodes of overt disturbance were
handled by the therapist without solicitude. His attitude
was one of interest, support and detachment. Patient and
therapist discussed plans for discharge and outpatient treatment.
The patient was discharged six weeks later.
Comment:

Subsidence of the changes in brain function
resulting from convulsive therapy permitted a new

integration of the doctor-patient relationship.
The pattern of a conventional psychotherapeutic
situation appeared. This differed both from the
original negative and the artificially induced
positive transference relationships.

�WW
Therapist's notes as

an index of

relatedness:

Following the conclusion of the study, another index
of the psychotherapeutic relationship was investigated.

Rioch (9) has described the use of the volume of

staff

progress notes as an index of staff-patient interaction.
The therapist had kept his notes in a standard stenographic
notebook throughout the treatment. A gross count of the
number of pages of notes per session could be made. This
is represented graphically on the chart. As no written notes
were taken during the occasional tape-recorded sessions,
these were omitted from the chart. The change in the
therapeutic relationship is apparent from the abrupt and
sustained increase in note-taking from the hhth day on.
This coincided with the first gross change in the electroencephalogram. The notes taken by the two other psychiatrists
in the supervisory meetings followed a similar pattern,
although with peaks of note-taking at the onset and again
at the waning of induced neurophysiologic change.

�DISCUSSION:

primary purpose of this report is to demonstrate the
value of a detailed investigation of psychotherapy when
somatic therapies are temporarily introduced as adjunctive
procedures. One of the difficulties in the objective study
of transference and countertransference phenomena is the
The

absence of a quantifiable and controllable variable. Adjunctive
therapies, somatic or pharmacological, provide such a variable.
They produce

alteration in behavior as well as concomitant,

measurable neurophysiologic changes (3, h). This opportunity
has been utilized in the present project. For example, one
of adaptation to altered brain function is a euphoric
type of relatedness (5). The occurrence of the phenomenon
in this case permitted us to observe how the induction of

mode

positive and negative transferences called forth similar
countertransference attitudes in therapist and supervisor.
Another illustration of this technique was our discounting
of the

earliest clinical

change during the Bhth to h2nd day

of somatic treatment. The electroencephalogram gave evidence
in favor of the significance of this beginning change in the

relationship. The fact that it was minimized demonstrates the
obscuring effects of staff expectancies. Finally, the alteration
of brain function in this course of psychotherapy was accompanied
by a change of the pattern of complaints i;g. from physical
symptoms to memory difficulty. This resulted in a modification

�-16..

of the dependency relationship (h3rd to 63rd day). The new
form of the relationship was experienced differently by the
staff, with resultant change in their feelings about the
patient. This effect was observed in the patient's family
group as well as in the supervisory group.

observations illustrate several other phenomena of
interest. One is peculiar to supervision in group settings.
We have called attention to the emotional
atmosphere of the
group, which seemed to fluctuate in accordance with the
therapeutic relationship being described. Hora (7) believes
that the supervises may communicate the affective aspects
of his experience with a patient by non-verbal means. His
formulation is that "the supervises unconsciously identifies
with the patient and involuntarily behaves in such a manner
as to elicit in the supervisor those very emotions which he
himself experiences while working with the patient, but was
unable to convey verbally." He also describes the diffusion of
this effect in the other participants of a supervisory seminar.
Thus he reports that, "This observation has been subjected to
repeated tests in seminars where it was possible to verify
the supervisor's emotional perceptions by matching them with
the emotional reactions of the other participants present."
Our work supports such observations and suggests the potential
fruitfulness of studies of group dynamics in supervisory
seminars.
We have noted one change in
relatedness resulting from
the somatic therapy that had a disjunctive effect upon the
The

�-17-

relationship (hSth day). The patient mentioned familiar
topics "as if it were new information." The "uncanny" quality
produced in the therapist and supervisor resulted from the
temporary feeling that the therapeutic relationship had no
history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a
great extent upon an accumulated body of shared information.
Both doctor and patient take this for granted, and the inability
to rely upon it may affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study,nct discussed in this paper,
showed different patterns of response. These included
transient paranoid episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic and other forms of "acting-out," which were disruptive
to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced
behavioral change was related to the personality of the
individual patient and occurred at the time of changing brain
function (3). Also, in each case, there were concomitant
changes in behavior in the supervisory group.
The limited scope of this study does not warrant general
conclusions as to the efficacy of concurrent somatic treatment
and psychotherapy. We have confined the discussion, therefore,
to the presentation of methodology and description of the
types of observations that can be made in such interdisciplinary
approaches.
Our experience does highlight, however, some of the
difficulties that may develop when the two modes of treatment
are used concurrently. Intensive psychotherapy is based upon

�-18a conviction as to the
the improvement of the

efficacy of verbal communication for
patient's adaptation. In the case
reported a trial period of psychotherapy had been ineffective
in altering clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic
treatment represented a decision against exclusive reliance
upon interpersonal communication as the therapeutic instrument.
When cerebral change was maximal a "social recovery" occurred.
This was apparently unrelated to interpretation of psychodynamic
factors. No increase in awareness of psychological relationships
was verbalised. When the induced neurophysiologic changes
subsided, there was a partial recurrence of earlier communication
patterns. This was accompanied by a brief period of doubt that
the modification of behavior could be perpetuated by interpersonal
means alone. To some extent this phenomenon was an expression
of the different conceptual and linguistic systems inherent
in the two modes of therapy. It is related to the philosophical
dichotomy described by Hollingshead and Redlich (6) between

practitioners using somatic and analytically-oriented therapies.
These considerations also arise in the use of psychopharmacologic
agents during the course of psychotherapy (h).

�SUMMARY:

study of the effects of concurrent somatic
therapy on psychotherapy is reported, in which
simultaneous observations of serial changes in brain
function, the psychotherapeutic relationship, and social
A

adaptation were made. The observations in a group
supervisory seminar reflected the pattern of neurophysiolcgical alteration.
It is concluded that the introduction of a measurable
physiological variable is a useful method for investigation
of the psychotherapy process.

�REFERENCES

l.

Cohen, M.B., Baker, 6., Cohen, R.A., Fromm-Reichman,
F., and Weigert, E.: An Intensive Study of Twelve
Cases of Manic—Depressive Psychosis, Psychiatry $1:
103, 195k.

2.

Esecover, 8., Jaffe, J. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychotherapeutie
Techniques with Electroshock Patients, J. Hillside
Hosp. 1: 17, 1958.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity
to Behavioral Response in Electroshock:Quantitative
Serial Studies,A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 1Q:
516, 1957.

3.

Fink, M.: A Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic
Therapies, J. Hillside Hosp.g: 197, 1957.
Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Green, M.: Experimental
Studies of the Electroshock Process, Dis. Nerv. 81 .
$2: 113, 1958.
Hollingshead, A.B. and Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and
Mental

Illness, J. Wiley

&amp;

Son, N.Y. T953.

Hora, T.: Phenomenology of the Supervisory Process,
Am. J. Psychother. $1: 769, 1957.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During
Electroshock Therapy, in Pa cho atholo of
ZuSEn,
P.
3. §§3., Grune
and
Communication, Hoch,
&amp;

Stratton, 1958.

Rioch, D. McK.: Research in Psychiatry: Certain
Problems and Developments in Multi-Disciplinary

Studies, T.W. Salmon Lectures,
1957 (in press).

N.Y. Acad. Med.

�noditiaation at Pnynhothornputtta frannaettonu
By

tltnrod

Drain Junction

"tt‘,

H.B.. E. 3.00.7.7, K.D.,
R. L. “hn, Phonu ‘ﬁd ﬂ. link, 8.D.
‘0

Iron thy aspartulnt a: Bxportuonsal Psychiatry, £111.16. loupttal,
61.“ O‘k.’ L.I., ‘1’.
Aided. in part, by tho Foundationn' thud tar Research in Puyehiutry
(SénlSl) and grant 3-927 of the rational Inu‘itutc o: nuntnl
lualth, laticntl Inutitﬂna of nculth, v.5. Public loalth aarvtoo.
Tho aunt-tango or 31:: 83th.: sander: :nd Hrs. Anita DCIIOI, who
participated auttvoly in tho tcatnnra, 1. gratitully acknavludgod.

III 10/30/59

�this rlport ta darivnd from a luporvinory suntan:
in which thn affect. at convultivc trontncnt upon p;y¢ho~
thornptut1e trananotxanu war. studiud. rho thornpist'u
abrcrvntinnl havo boon douoribod in u previous publicattou
(2). in: proaoat pups: accorthcu thn pronoun tr.u tho
franc at ratcrcaco at tho atporvisor and ouporvinory
group. It 1! intondod an n aonplonontnry hot or
obaorVItioua at thin nonbinud therapy. In addition,
ouncurront neurophyulalogia ant: arc includad, of vhich
both thornpiat and supervisor var. unnuuro. this udditiouul
tram. of xutorenoo may broaden the underutnndiug or eurtnin
phonononu 1n the pattcnt-thcrapint, and therapiltulnparvitcr

tatcraottona.
to don-natratt that the intraduction
a: a unanurablo phyuiologiaul variablo 1: a ncctul Itthod
for the turoatixatinn a: tho payehothcrapy pronoun.
Our purpaao 13

�xxggan:

tho ootttag too o uookhr oulttodiooaplioory
ooporvtoovy oontorouoo. Ioalndod in tho group rotor o) tho
thoroptot (3.8.), (at tho ttno o senior rootdont in poynhiotrr),
who proooutod tho enoo uotortol;
h) o ooatol worhor who
roportod tho rooponoo at tho yotiont'o fonily; a) o poyoho~

onolyot (3.5.), who doolt mainly with tho d1doct1e oopocto
of psychothoropoutte toohniquo; d) o poychologiot (3.3.).
who studiod tho eoooo indopondontly3 and
o) o nonrepoyohiotrtot (8.!t). who coordinotod tho diocuooion. rho

loot tot nooboro wart ovoro of tho connooitont chouxoo 1:
phyoioloxtc honouroo, one olthough thlo intorlotton infloouood
thotr quoottouo, tho doto woo not introdtcod ot thooo toaforonooo.
rho octuol oo-otlo trootoout woo porforood by o phyoioion who

not o porticipont ot tho nootingo.
Tho pronodoro woo intoruol, with tho thoroptot toktnx
tho lood 1a prooonttnx hto vorbotto uotoo of tho poyohothoropy
Tho
ooootoao.
ordor of tho aooo roporto and tho ooount o:
tiuo dovotod to oath woo not prooorihod. Iolloring tho
opoutohoouo oooo pronoutotion, morn dironttvo quootiouiag
II! Introdoood, otood ot choritytnx and rolottns tho intoraotioa
proooutod by thoroptot ond ootiol vortor.
woo

�803130?!

the hintertee e! the enhaeate at thte study were
reported in e previeee publication (2). In thie report e
detailed enelyeie of Gate #3 (0.0.) 1- presented es meet
illustretive or the nodixieation of interpereomel trenaeetiene
by extered hrein function. This petieut, e hh your old vitae
end nether of e 12 yeer old eon, bed been ednitted to the
hoepxtel with eyaptone of depreeeion, enxiety, enorexie,
varied phyeicel complaints, end feelings é: unreelity end
isoletien. In psychotherapy eeeeione she would reiterete
her difficultiee in e cenpleining pattern, repetitiouely
illustretinx her inedequecy. During e three nonth period
an ilpreveaent occurred end A couree at electroehoek therepy
wee reeoeeended. At thte Junotute the patient wee included
in the preeent study.
vsg§;!:c_rnxnarr:
cheervetiene eede dertn; the period of eenetxe therepy
ere depleted in the euconpenying ehert. During the 9k deye
of supervision tee different levee e: eoeetie treetleut were
utilieed. This procedure wee pert e: e heepitel-wide
eonvuleiveoeubeeavuleive control etedy then in progreee, in
which therepiete were enewere at the introduction or enheonvuleive pheeee e: treetnent.
Fer the tit-t treeteent period (21 deye) the patient
received eebeenvuleive electra-etlaeletiou with pentethel

�‘h.
pronodiootiou. roolvo oooh trootnonto ooro givon ot tho
roto or throo por rook. lo ohonxoo in tho ooohtitotivo
looooroo o: 336 olov oovo ootivity (3) woro monitoot during
thio tins. fhio poriod oorvod to ootobiioh o booolino for
tho hohoviorol oboorvotiooo and tho oxpootonoioo of tho

otott.
In tho oooond trootnoht porioo (29th to 59th doyo),
grand nol oonvoloiono uoro ihduood thrioo wookly for o totol
o: 1h trootnonto. In thio ported, nioiaol dogrooo of EEG
ohongo ooro rooordod on tho 37th doy, ond uodoroto dogrooo.
woro shown on throo oohooqoont rooordingo. foolvo doyo
ottor tho toroiootino o: oonvuloivo thoropy, EEG slow wovo

ootivity

ooooidorohly dioioiohoo. this intoruhtioo woo
not ovoilohlo to tho thoropiot or tho ooporvioor until ottor
tho ooholuoioa of tho otooy.
woo

-ﬁ.‘.‘....‘..0ﬂd.ﬂ.
Pic.

1

about horo

-DO“-....‘..O-....
rho potioot woo ooon in poyohothoropy ooooiono throo
tiloo vookly throughout hor hoopitoliootion. Hhilo tho thoropiot
II! ovoro of tho ooooorront oonotio trootnoot, ho woo nnovoro

that oohoohvoloivo oti-olotion

woo

givon

initiolly,

ohd of tho

ohonso to convoloivo thoropy on tho 29th doy.

thongoo in tho potiont—thoropiot rolotionohip oo

roportod in tho ouporvioory lootiogo oro oonnorisod in tho ohort
ond oro dotoilod in tho following ohoorvotiooo.

�0188371

;tt

,IS!

2: 12th dgz;

firot throo

vookl tho thoropiot did not
dioeuoo thio potiont in tho ooporvioory group. othor potionto
oooupiod tho allottod tino, in opito o: o rooolutioa to
‘

Daring tho

conoidor oaoh potiont vookly.
Gounonts

In totroppoot, tho toiluro to roport
this potiont 'o pragrooo coaotitutod o
pottoru or ovoidoneo. sonotiu thoropy hod'
not Iodiriod tho potiont'o word bohovior or
tho doctor-potiont rolotioaohip. Both voro
tho onto to in tho initiol Iontho a: hospital-

iootion.
rho nonrophyoiologio indieoo voro
unohonxod.

20th to 22:4 dog:
rho oooo history

firot

prooontod in tho looting on
tho 20th doy. rho thoropiot roportod no oltorotion in tho
potiont'o clinging, whining, holplooo ottitudo throughout tho
proooding throo uontho. Errorto to oxplorovhor problouo in
1171:; uoro blookod by phyoieol oonplointo and by rocitolo of
woo

Ho
woo loft
of
toiluro.
tooling:
guilt, oolt-roprooch,
littlo oponiag £0» counont.
In tho throo ouporvioory nootingo during thio poriod
tho group otnoophoro woo ono of diluenrogonoat thou thio eooo
too prooontod. the thoropiot roportod inpulooo to oxhort tho

oud

�.6patient to participate in ward activitiee, and reacted to
her prereeeieue e: helpleeeneae with the feeling that *ehe
eaan't trying.‘
eoneidered
The taniiy reported that the patient
her
doctor "tee reung,' retleetiac he: attitede e: repreaoh toearde
theee who were unable to help her. He, in turn, felt that
eke wee 'threeiuc up he: hende and giving up.“
I

gelnenta

the therapeutic iayaeee eae eapathieaiiy oeuaenicated to the creep by the
cane repert. The transactiene during thie
peried were typically theee leading to
referral of depreeeed patiente for eeaetia
(i.e. noncverbel) treataent. they nay be
toileee.
Verbal nethede
ee
eharaeterieed
er therapy are inceepatible with the affective
made at cannunieetien adapted by each patiente
(1). The deetor'e atterte to help are not eat
by a eellaheretive reepenee, and he feels
treetratea. the ineatieble qeaiiﬁy er the
patient“ dean“ a1" «11. berth deteueive
veeetiene in the therapiet.
Baring thin period the node or eeaatie
treetaent wee chanced tree eaheenveieive to
eeaﬁleive. The elinieal etatne and therapeutic
relatienehip, hetever, eentiaaed unaltered.
Perhaps the lack of the expeated reapenee to

�.7.
eenetie treetnent eentributed te the

thereptet'e dieeeuregeuene. le eeee-ed
thet cenvuleteue nee been induced from
the euteet, end hie peet experienee bed
led hie te entteipete e elinieel reepenee
by the fourth week e: teeetlent (3).
to ytnd 63!.
In the aeetinx thet teak pleee en the 38th day, e
“alight chenlef wee reverted; Although the,pet1ent tee etill
revinxi
1n therepy eeeeiene, it wee elee
renting,
'eryinc,
neted thet 'ehe pertteipetee 1a eetivlttee e 11$t1e bit note,
but net naeh.’ {he therepiet end the group discounted ehie
ehenge an eeeiel relet30nehtpe. the tiret eyeateueoee oonpleint
at eeeery dittieelty'vee elee reported.
«age:

cennent:
the

Sir-t

evidenee er eeurephyetelegte
eheuge ep’eered et thie tine. the 3E6 teken
the any prter ‘0 thin leetlng eheued e

Wm

eixuitteent inereeee in slew

wave

eettvxty.

In the neeting en the hSth day ﬁne therepiet reyerted
e full perehetherepy eeeelee fer the rivet tine. Re deeertbed
the pettent ee 'brighter,’ ”with e little eere reuse end
lipetteh' end 'eetltng.‘ rue deye leﬁer her need wee meted
ee 'eupheric.‘ Phyeteel eonpleinte eeeeed end were replaced
by aenpleinte of forgetting. The therepiet deeeribed thie
ee e *oeeeetteu e: ceapleintng.‘ concomitantly, the effective

�.8.
expreeeien
wee repleeed by e eere intelleeteelieed
e:
pettern. Ineteed e: etetiux “I here to cling to I: nether“
the petieet eeid '1': dependent en ey nether ter may thus"
Thie eee deeerihed ee 'telhina ehent her dependency in e
different eey.‘ Another cheese in eeneenioetion pettern
eveked 'enoenny‘ reeliuge in the therepiet. ﬁe eteted that
the petient 'eentiene things we hed telhed ebout ee it it
were nee in:ereetien.'
With theee ehenzee,there wee e ceneeeitent iaereeee
in the petient'e eeeiehility end perthipetien in heepitel
eetiritiee, end e dieieetien er her clinging to the teeily
end therepiet. whe euporrieory group etueephere eleo changed free one e: hepeleeeneee te well-being, with increeeed aching,
eniling end enineted participation.
0n the 52nd dey the therapist reported thet the
petient are-led seductively end epplied treeh rehe-up for
eede

l

V

her eeeeiene. She expreeeed toelinge or treat end enjoyment
e! the neetinge. the doctor experienced einiler eeetiene,
end ere eexer to repert the pregreee of this oeee. fhe patient
wee new 'upeet' beeeaee ehe couldn‘t resell her prehlene, end
the therapiet noted that he wee inclined to e directive “re-ether.
He
end
she
of
leee
coupleined
memory
role.
ettenpted
felt
in:'
to relete in e triendly, reelieticelly gratifying we: to prevent
further peyuhologie exploration.
A greater deteehlent from her family wee expreeeed.
Seeiel ilpreve-eet continued. the felily eteted thet ehe no
'

�.9.
long-r onunidorud the doctur 'tao 1033;,” but rnihor a
'guiding nasal.“
Gunnontt

Eh: ubrupt,

groi-

ahnngo in tho

picturu parnnllud tn. duvolopttnt
or anxiaun physiological change. The

61131031

rayorda during this poriod uhovcd
u nodcratl ducts. of slaw wavo activity.
Tho udvunt or pcn1tsvo tooling: olicitod
-ruciprocnl elation: in thn thordpist which
1n
thu supervinery cautions.
caununicntad
utrt
tho attoat was alpsthic:11y rotluctod in
nonbiru at the conxcrcuoo group. (rho clinical
pioturc roaonbltd that at a 'trtunforonac auro.')
throo

EEO

It

10

.! iattraut

that I chant. tron

"physical“ to *nnncry’ eonplnintt was dolarlbea
1: I ‘uoaustton at oonpluiulnx.’ Pcrhupa the
notary dottctt, an expootnd oonconittnt or
oonvulntvc thurnpy, 1. nova acacptablo to the
lint: becauau 1t 1- underatundablo. Thu: £001
a rnaponaibility for this tynptoa tad nun
tuthorttativoly r033Iuro thu putlatt that it
will be transiant. in lifteticnuta dapcndoncy
any .100 be more tolorah1c thin a hastilt out,
when
ucconpnniod bi erutifyinz oaeinl
oupccinlly
improvonant.

Tho langungo

change:

3:. indicative

of a nor. deﬁnah‘d, intqlleotnnltacd ooununicntioa

�~10»

of taniltar content (8). Th. patinat nor
”talked abaut' ruthor thnn cunting or “acting
out.“ This nav 1:33:33. patttrn can nor. in
kooping with hat background or oulloau uduaataoa,
and the thcrtyint's inplioit unpoetutions (9).
In contrast to her prior node of cuuuuntcntton
1t canned ta to nor. noipgtiblo with a purchaauulytically-oriontcd approach. The concomitant
dovslopnant of honor: difficulty, howovur,
perpetuated thc cantnttully nonninalghtrul
thorapuutic nitnnticn.
65th to 12nd gig!
than ported followod tho termination a: sciatic
trontannt. fhe patiout Inverted a ”auddoa £90115: ’1 3011‘
cvnrouuuo.“ Euphorta and gentry attticulty wit! a. 19:10:
tbscrvud, tad an amnion. ltlt. :uportcnod. Payohothortpy
toutinnu worn nhnrtctor1s¢d by morn crittcal appruisal at
hot 11:. uitunttnn. tar tho first txun tho doctor 3:10 tho
Thu
tho
in
auctions.
tine
group voiced ton.
txtra
pattont
unacorn that aha wt. "olippiuc back.9 thn thd patient.
.ccactoually talkud positivolr nbout euro-r, cutncipttiou
tron lather, 333., the tharnpist tolt called upon to rospond
optiniutically, rather thug to explore. Thurs vs; I rtvivul
or old canplnintn.
At thin paint, tha supervilar tad thortpist roviovod
A
nuonion.
recurrence of tho ourltor
a tnruvroeordcd thtrupy

�vorbal putt-run could indeed be tdcntitiod. nauuvur, than.
coourrod 1n airuuunoribad fashion ruthor than throughout $30
intervinv. The «wont: nutcccdunt to Inch parlodn worn
attainad Ind tha adaptivh nature at the racnrront n£tocttvo
pnttornu haunt. apparant.
coununt:

tundra during this patina
showed a considorlbla duoranau in slow
The EEG

activity.

tn:

:

cauconitant
rocntabllihnant at IOII of tho connunieutlon
pattorna which pracedod tau period or altered
brain function. Th0 coutarsnco group responded
with nnxtoty rotlootod in the solicitouunnul
of tho thortpiat in pralongtnz in: sonoi¢ns.
the phononunan obsorvoa ta ta. nnpcrvitory
stain, for luck at a bottnr turn, may be callcd
'alcetronhack dupcndoaoy.‘ statoncntn were
lid. in tha matting such us 'cho'u slipping buck,”
"no.4. ucr- troutnonts* and ”taprovanont not
holding up.“ In... Itatcnonts inyly that the
hoitilcodcycndaat panama mm being thought a:
primarily as a nonalcgie ﬂntity, ”a dopraauiun,‘
rtthor than a node or Bantu ralatodnunn. Porhapa
hcuuuac hohuviorul chnngo had not boon attcctod
by psychologic Incas a1930, it new conned tottlly
dopondout upon thc alteration in acrcbrul function.
yaw.

Thurs

�1-1

a.

rha chins. 1n intoraction was «Qneoptltltibd
as th: roanlt of the brain syndroan, ﬁnd not
an a function of tho doatcrupntiont relation.
Edna.
tho graup'h «acacia... on 6h.
ahip.

sporadic rcappcaranco or praeouvrloivc
puttornt. Thu dotatlcd oxnuinattou of I
t‘po~racordud caution rqvualod ti. ndqﬁtvo
functtun or this not. circumacribod occurrcnon
of the canvlaiatt, tad the phnnancnon of
“electroshock dupnndunay' Vt! not obnorvod
in Inblcqucnt group nactinga.
12rd to 25th 4:13
baring this ported a not. stubln yuyvhothorupcntxc
rtlatitnlhip was upparont. the ptticnt boots. nor. tndcpnndcnt
and d£lcnalad prohlcno a! euupltauoo and uolt~aalurtavoucla.
Although hot at$1tudo rousinod petitivo and eollnborutivo, hi!
tdlllttin a: the thcrapiat diniutuhod. In on. 3.3.1.: ch.
:31! *luyho I vantt xnt buttor union. I get that: at run.“
an. ant lens olntad. 5h. ncvcd troy eh. cloned ward so an
upon 00:113., and bugnn *u Ibrk_1a the hospittl library.
Occulionll Ipinodul of ownrt disturbance war. ‘run‘cd by tho
thcrapiut washout salinituda. n1- attitude us: an: of intorant,
tappart sud datuchnont. 1a.: dtnouusod plan: tar dischargo
and

.u‘pntlunt ‘ruutnnnt.

�-13.
Gemnentz

Suhaidanaa

at tha chances in brain

fanation raaulting tron_cénvulaiva thorapy
permittad a not iatagration or the doatnrﬁ
patiant ralationahip. Thu pattern or a
céhvanttanal paychotharapaatic attuatiau
appeared, which airfarad both fro: the
crazinal negative and the artificially
induced poaitiva relatianahipa.
rharantat'a nataa an an ands: a: relatedness:
Following tha cancluaian of tho study, anathar 1ndax
at tho payehotharapautie ralattouahip was invaatigatad. ﬂinch
baa daaaribad the use of tha volume or stat: pragraaa nataa aa
an 134a: at ata£t«patxant intavactian (10). Tha thorapiat
had kapt ht. natal in a standard atanoxraphic notahoak thranzho
out tha troatnant. 1 grant count or the aunbar of vagaa or
nataa par tau-ion vaa maﬁa, and in rapraaantcé graphically an
aha chart. lo written meta. vara takan daring occasional
tapa¢raaardad aaaaioaa, and thaaa ara anittad from tho chart.
Tho chance in tha ralatienahip is apparant from tha abrupt
and paratatant incraaaa ﬁnnota taking from tho hhth day.
this aoiuuadad with tha tirat groan changa in tha alaatraanoaphalogran. Tho nut-a takon by aha two ethar psychiatriata
in tho unparviaory naatinga rallauad a aiuilar pattorn (not
illuatratad), although with peaks 6! actoatakinz at tha onaat
and again at the waning or inducad naurophwrialagta changa.

�.1h.
Iscusa I!hso vaport dasnrlbts an tnvonttgatian at vlrrhat&amp;orapy
adjunc$1vu
procuauru.
an
intracuucd
as
to
aauugio
thcrupy
than
and dtftiuulty in ﬁho fbj.¢$1V! Itudy of puyuhotharupcuttc
centrallﬁblu
ana
traanaatttaa it tho abnsncn a: I quanttraablt
pharnnool¢gtanl.
Ind
tauntia
thurapton.
variablo. ,gdduncttvo
bohuvior
in
altorgtioa
product
gravid. tank 1 varinblo. racy
was.
h).
(3.
change:
tn wall I! uniqurablu naurophyaiolauic
prudent.
«#111334
an.
in
hula
In
pnunt
urw‘utty
1.
tunntluu
brain
altcrud
ta
Ixtnpln, oat Iona a! tduyta‘ion
tho
Eh.
at
coaurrauco
(5).
r.1ato¢ncsu
0t
typo
tuphurio
I
haw
%o
inducud
obicrv.
an
phﬁnanouun in this 0:30 purai‘tcd
9511
forth
uttiﬂudto
‘nd
accltivo
altnrantioi .1 pontttv.
Anetta:
5nd
uupcrviuor.
‘hcruplut
tn
llnilnr uttitudca
011n1¢:1
unrlxunt
0:
tho
discounting
ti.
alluatrnﬁtoa wt;
The
Ilcutroa
hand
or
truntlnut.
ﬁhth
«:1
to
ahnauo during thi
beginning
this
.1
an.
:tgnatteuueu
instantad
ouctphnllarun
miniutsud
1t
thut
Th.
tau!
ﬁll
13
tho
ralnttonuhip.
chnng.
dcnnunﬁrt‘oo tho intestine «(Stats 0: uttxt .xpcotancicc.
by
«coup-uni“
um
mum.»
brain
of
”3.111,”:
from
uyaptcns
phywicul
1n
ﬁulplaznt
5¢3,,
puttarn.
oh‘nxt
:
the
of
3
tern
Thin
in
ruaultcd
ant
t0 nounxydtstiauzty.
which
oxportonocd
was
63rd
day)
to
(hjrd
dcp¢n¢¢u¢y rtlatlonahlp
shuns.
rcuul‘nnt
with
tun
supervinary
otatt,
atttortntly hr
nine
was
rhtu
0:3:ct
thy
p&amp;t1ant.
ubant
in thoir :nolinsa

w

unﬁt“:

�pstient'e resily group.
The oheervstions else illnetrete e phenoeeaeh
supervieion
we
heve celled
in
to
settings.
greep
peculiar
sttention to the emotional steoephere or the are up, which
seemed to fleateste in eoeerdenue with the therepeetie rea
Here
the
(7)
described.
thst
suggests
being
istieaehip
observed in the

supervises say eoanunisete the effective sepsete or his
experience with the pstient nenaverhsliy in the eupervisevy
nesting. his ternaletien is thet *The supervises unconsciously
identities with the petient end invelentsriiy hehevee in such
s esnner es te elicit in the supervisor theee very esstiens
which he himself experiences ehile working sith the petieat,
but use unehle to convey verbally.” He elso describes the
diffusion at this extent in the other psrtioipenta or e
supervisory sesiner. thus he reports that 'rhis ehservetien
hse been suhaeeted to repented tests in eeniners where it use
possible to vsrit’ the euyervieor'e enetiohel perceptions by
sstehinx thee with the eeotiehsl resctiens or the other
psrtieipents present.” Our work supports such observetiene
sud suggests the patentiel truitrhlnees or studies or group
dynsnies in supervisory eeeiuers.
we he's noted one ehenss in reletednese resulting
tree the seentie therspy that hsd e disasuetive effect upon
the rsletiehship (age dsy). the petieet mentioned teeilier
tepiee ”es it it were new infatuation.” the 'nnoenny‘ queiity
predeeed in the therepiet end supervisor resulted from the

�.16.
had
no
the
relationship
that
therapeutic
temporary feeling
history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a
great extent upon an accuaulated body of shared inforaatien.
loth doctor and patient take this for granted, and the inability
to rely upon it nay affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study, not discussed in this
paper, showed different patterns of response. These included
transient paranoid episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic and other forns of 'acting-out' which were disruptive
1

to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced
the
behavioral change was related to
personality of the
individual patient end occurred at the time of changing brain
function (3). Also in each case there were conconitant changes
in behavior in the supervisory group.
Our experience also highlights some of the difficulties
that nay develop when the two nodes of treatment are used
concurrently. Intensive psychotherapy is based upon the
conviction as to the efficacy of verbal communication for
iaproveaent of the patient's adaptation. In the case reported
a trial period of psychotherapy had been ineffective in altering
clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic treatment
represented a decision against exclusive reliance upon interWhen
communication
the
instrunent.
as
therapeutic
personal
cerebral change was aaxinal a “social recovery“ occurred,
apparentlr unrelated to interpretation of psychedynanic factors.
When the induced neurophysiologic changes subsided, a recurrence
of earlier oonnnnication patterns led the therapist to doubt
‘

,

�.17-

that in. iapravaaant oeuid ha parpatuatad by intarparaoual
aaana aloha. to can. extant thin phanauanan was an
expraaaioa a: diﬂlrint aancaptual and linguiatic ayataaa
ink-rant in in. two node: a: thorapy. It in ralatad to tho
philaaaphiaal dichotomy daacriboi by Haliiaxahaad and nadlieh
(6) batwaan practitionara using aoaatic and analyticallyariaatad Sharapiaa.
I

8931‘!!!

i

atady a: concurrant aquatic and payohatharapiaa ia
taperiad, in which ainnitanaoua obnorvationa of atrial
”in.
brain
in
function,
omgu
paychothanpaatio ralatiouahip
and social adaptation var. Iada. rho ohaarvationa in a
afonp aaparviaory salinar ratlaatad tha yattarn or natty;
phyaiologia altaratiou.
It ia canciudad that tho introduction or a aaaaarabia
phyaialosio variable in a aaatul aathod for investigation

at intarparaonai ralaiionahipa.

�-13.
BEIEREIGES

1.

count, 1.1., frusn~801¢hn&amp;un,
3iklf,
0.,
x.n.,
and Roigzrt, 3.: A: latch-ido‘stugy c§£r:01vo
1.,
cases .1 Han ouncprunl vs Pay: as a, Ila a g;
103' 1951‘

cohon,

u,

o

queovor, 3., Jntfo, J. and

Kuhn, R.L.¢ Payehnthcrnpoutic

foehniquoo with Eloctroahook Pattontl,
logz.‘1u 17.&gt;1958.

3.

rink,

J, Hill-1d.

l:hn, R.L.a Relation a: nun bolt: Activity
Quantitativo
to Inhaviorti Responao in Electronhoak.
Soraul stadium, A.H.A. Arch. laurel. &amp; Pnzchtat.lgu
H. and

516, 1957.

h. rink,

Emailed Theory of the nation or Phystodynaaic
l
l.:
ibtrnpiuﬁ, J, Hillside 30.2. g; 197. 1957.

5. Pink, l.‘hxnhn, R.L. and aroon, H.c Bxporinnntnl Studio:
of I nloctroahoek Fractal, Bin. Not. all. 32:
113, 1958.
6. lalliaglhand, 1.]. and lodlieh, 1.0.: Social Olunl tad
ﬂinttl Illnuln, J. U110: &amp; Son, . .,
.
7. Kora, 2.: Phononsnology 0! ‘ho Supurvisory Precast,

“O J. chhothor. E" 769, 1957.
8. tuba, 8.L. and rink, x.s chanson 1n Lungnngo During
Eltatronhock rhor‘py, 1n Palahgfathologi or
connnnieatl n, Inch, P. an I a, . o 3., Gran.
E 3!:35‘33, I956.
(aha, 3.1.. Polltck, H. and rink, K.: sociopuycholocic
Aspects a: Psychiatric rroatnnnt 1a a Volunttry
xcntal noupital, 1.3.5. Arch. Gen. Pazehiu . (1n

proul).

10.

Hal-I ROI-arch 1n Pcyuhiutryt curtain Prohlonu
sud Dovclepncntn in Hulttuﬁiaaiplinary studion,
2.8. Stlnon zocturor, l.!. laud. lad., 1957.

kiosk,

D.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2804">
                <text>Modification of psychotherapeutic transactions by altered brain function. Am J Psychother. 1961 Jan; 15:46-55.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2805">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2806">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-49-015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2807">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2808">
                <text>Jaffe J.; Esecover, H., Kahn, R. L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2809">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2810">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2811">
                <text>Reprint and two [preprints]. Reprint from AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, Vol. XV, No. 1, pages 46—55. January, 1961.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2812">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2813">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74483">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81044">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87605">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94166">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="282" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="73">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/6ae8392f9c68d3b213edf8358a9597ac.pdf</src>
        <authentication>bdf1e6bcabb4c1d8c82905940f4f07c2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100699">
                    <text>REPRINTED FROM
E. ROTHLIN
(Editor)

NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
VOL. 2 (1961)
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting
of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum
IBasle 1960

ELSEVIERPUBLISHINGCOMPANY
AMSTERDAM

�Reprinted from: E. ROTHLIN (Editor), Neuro-Psychopharmacology, V01. 2 (1961),
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale
Ne'uro-Psychopharmacologicum, Basle 1960
‘

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC RESPONSE PATTERNS OF
SOME PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS
MAX POLLACK, ERIC KARP, GEORGE KRAUTHAMER,
DONALD F. KLEIN AND MAX FINK
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N. Y. (U.S.A.)

PROBLEM

This study of the mode of action of some of the newer psychotropic agents was formulated within the framework of a neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesisl. The concept,
derived from earlier work on convulsive therapiesz, views clinical behavioral change as
a resultant of the interaction of alterations in brain function and the personality of
the subject. The present study emphasizes the question of pattern speciﬁcity of drug
action and its relation to individual differences in behavioral response. The particular
drugs utilized, chlorpromazine3 and imipramine“, were selected on the basis of pilot
studies in this institution in which their effectiveness in altering physiologic and
behavioral patterns had been demonstrated.
This presentation is an interim report of a study currently in progress.
METHOD

Consecutive referrals for drug administration in a voluntary psychiatric hospital were
assigned at random to one of the three drug regimens: (I) chlorpromazine with 1.2%
procyclidine added, (2) imipramine, and a (3) placebo. Medication was administered
in liquid vehicle in a ﬁxed dosage schedule, to a maximum in four weeks. Chlorproma—
zine was begun at 300 mg and increased to 1200 mg daily and imipramine from 75 to
300 mg. Patients continued to be seen three times weekly in individual psychotherapeutic interviews during the period of drug treatment.
Analysis of the data is limited to the ﬁrst 48 cases. These patients are not chronically ill—the majority being admitted for their ﬁrst hospitalization from the community, and a smaller percentage rehospitalized for a recurrence of their illness. Their mean
age was 35.5 years, and years of schooling was 11.9 years. Approximately 57% were
diagnosed in the group of schizophrenias, 28% as affective psychoses and I 5 0/5 psycho—
neuroses and character disorders.
Patients were examined in a four day period prior to drug administration on a
ﬁxed schedule of physiological and psychological procedures which was repeated

during the sixth week of drug treatment.

RESULTS

Group changes in some of the measures with drug treatments are shown in Table I.
The EEG patterns measured quantitatively through electronic frequency analysis5
References

1).

384.

�382

M. POLLACK et

al.

show that imipramine and chlorpromazine differ signiﬁcantly from the control group
and from each other. There was a signiﬁcant reduction in the total electrical activity
in the imipramine group, while there was an increase both in the amount of slow-wave
activity and the slow to fast activity ratios in the chlorpromazine group.
TABLE I
GROUP CHANGES WITH DRUG TREATMENT

EEG
Slow/fast ratio
Total activity
Delta ratio

Control

I rmpramme

Chlarpromazine
w it h Procyc l {dine

0

0

co

0|

++
0
++

Perceptual
Critical ﬂicker fusion 0
Motor
Pursuit—rotor
Tapping speed
Hand steadiness

Intellectual
WechslerBellevue IQ

O
O

++

05
01

——

+

O

O

O

+

o

o

Behavorial rating
Symptom complaint —
0
Depression

+ Increase p.
+ + Increase p.

o

—-

—

o No change

— Decrease
—— Decrease

P
P

0.05
0.01

The reduction in the critical ﬂicker—fusion (CFF) threshold is noted only for the
chlorpromazine group. This test correlated with the increase in EEG slow-wave
activity.The motor tests also reﬂect a differential drug effect with unsteadiness increased by the two drugs, tapping rate unaltered, and pursuit rotor improved only by
the imipramine group. The greatest change in intellectual functioning was scored by
the no-drug group, present to a lesser degree in the imipramine group and absent in
the chlorpromazine group. The lack of equivalent changes for the drug groups may
reﬂect an inhibition of the expected practice effect.
In clinical behavior, all groups showed a reduction in complaints on self-rating
as measured by the Johns Hopkins Scale, with the reduction being greater for the
drug groups. In the Clyde Mood Scale, a Q—sort behavioralrating, there was a quantitative reduction in both the patient’s and the doctor’s ratings of “depression” in the
drug group but not for the control group.
While these data indicate a pattern that suggests differential drug activity, there
was marked heterogeneity within each group on each measure. Table II shows the
changes in CFF for each subject. The number within each box refers to the evaluation
of a change in behavior, rated on a four—point scale by the evaluating psychiatrist.
These are global changes in behavior ratings, and are not necessarily equivalent to
References p. 384.

�NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC RESPONSE PATTERNS

383

ratings of improvement. (Note that the ratings of behavioral change “3” and “4”
were most often associated with changes in CFF of more than one cycle.)
Although the difference in mean CFF score between imipramine and the control
group was not signiﬁcant, the difference in variability (F ratio) was signiﬁcant (P =
0.05). The control group showed a narrow range of change, varying from +1 to ——2
cycles. In contrast, the imipramine group ranged from +2 to ——5 cycles, and chlorpromazine from zero to ——6 cycles. The chlorpromazine group change was in the downward direction only. The individual differences in the alterations of CFF threshold
II

TABLE

CHANGE IN FLICKER FUSION THRESHOLD WITH DRUG TREATMENT
Contrél

+2
+1

o
—1

—2
__3

Imipmmine

2 2 I

4 4 2
I
3 3 1
3 1 1
3
‘

2 2 2 I I
3 I I

1

1

3

1

4 2
4 2

——4

—5
—6

Mean diﬂ.
Change in C.P.S.

Chlorpromazine Behavorial
with Procyclidine
change

2

1

4
4
4
4

4
3 2
3

4
4 3
2

——o.6

——o.4

TABLE

None
Mild
3 Moderate
4 Marked
I
2

——3.1

III

‘CHANGE IN EEG (SLOW/FAST/RATIO) WITH DRUG TREATMENT

1mm
—.4
——.3
——.2

—.1
o

+.1

+.2
+.3

+4
+5

2
2
I
2

1

I

4
I 1
3 2

11
1

443111

3 2

322
4

4 3

4 1 3
4 4 3
4

1

1

1

3

3

1

3:22:22“

INone

2
3

Mild

Moderate
4 Marked

4

+.6

+-7

4
4

&gt;+-7
Mean diff.
Change in slow/fast ratio

firearm

+.026

+.or4

+.401

are also observable in the electroencephalographic indices. Table III shows the changes
in the slow to fast EEG activity ratio demonstrating a wide range in changes for the
controls, a similar pattern for the imipramine group, but a change in only one direc—
tion—that of increased slowing for the chlorpromazine group. The mean increase in
slow-wave activity for the chlorpromazine group was more than I5 times that of the
References p. 384.

�384

M. POLLACK et

al.

control and imipramine groups. There was also a signiﬁcant relation between the increase in slow-wave activity and increasing age with chlorpromazine—older patients
being more susceptible to maximum change.
DISCUSSION

The psychological and EEG ﬁndings show that the agents studied affect these random—
ly selected subjects differentially, producing drug—speciﬁc spectrums of change scores.
This demonstration of drug speciﬁc proﬁles based on multiple tests supports previous
statements by such workers as WIKLER“, LEHMANN7, and KLERMAN et al.8. It should
be noted, however, that these test score proﬁles are contingent on population characteristics and not solely on the biochemical properties of the agents tested. While no
adequate delineation of salient population characteristics is available, two general
schemata are in use—the diagnostic nomenclature, and the concept of ”target symp—
toms”. Neither scheme adequately reﬂects population characteristics, and further
studies of multivariate behavioral, physiologic and psychologic characteristics are
necessary for such delineation. It is thus imperative that drug studies utilize more
detailed analyses of pretreatment physiological and psychological functioning. In the
absence of such methodological reﬁnements, the present confusing and contradictory
data about “drug effects”, “paradoxical reactions”, and imputed speciﬁcities will
continue.
CONCLUSION

I. Pattern speciﬁcities in various tasks can be identiﬁed for group data.
2. Within various groups, individual differences may be great, leading to failure
for some group data to achieve signiﬁcant differences. Further exploration of pattern
speciﬁties for subjects is warranted, using some of the more recent statistical techniques of multivariate analysis.
3. Such pattern speciﬁcities for clusters of subjects may be a more meaningful way
of ordering psychiatric subjects for evaluative studies than conventional nosological
methods.
4. Group data for EEG, CFF and behavior are consistent with neurophysiologic—
adaptive views of drug therapeutic efﬁcacy.
REFERENCES
1

3

3
7

M. FINK, A uniﬁed theory of the action of physiodynamic therapies. ]. Hillside Hosp, 6 (1957)
197.
M. FINK, Effect of anticholinergic compounds on post-convulsive EEG and behavior of psychiatric patients. Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 12 (1960) 359.
M. FINK, R. SHAW, G. GROSS AND F. S. COLEMAN, Comparative study of chlorpromazine and
insulin coma in the therapy of psychosis. ]. Am. Med. Assoc., 166 (1958) 1846.
M. FINK, Electroencephalographic and behavioral effects of Tofranil. Cari. Psychiat. Assoc. f.,
4 (I959) 166 SG. A. ULET’I‘ AND R. G. LOEFFEL, A new resonator-integrator unit for the automatic brain wave
analyser. Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 5 (1953) 113.
A. WIKLER, The Relation of Psychiatry to Pharmacology, Williams &amp; Wilkins, Baltimore, 1957.
H. E. LEHMANN AND J. CSANK, Differential screening of phrenotropic agents in man. J. Clin.
Exptl. Psychopathol., 18 (1957) 222.
G. L. KLERMAN, A. DIMASCIO, M. GREENBLATT AND M. RINKEL, The inﬂuence of speciﬁc per—
sonality patterns on the effects of phrenotropic agents. In Biological Psychiatry, Grune &amp; Stratton, New York, 1959, pp. 224—239.

Printed in The Netherlands

��IWEGPSIGIGLMIB RESPGISB

'

“runs

at

sons rsrczonorzc nuns

Ha: Fullnek Ph.D., Erie Earp 3.1.
George Krauthunor

Ph.n., Donald 1. Klein

Cad HI! Pink

H.D.

Ht”.

Iran the Dapartnent or Exporinentnl Psychiutry, Hillside Helpital,
Glcn Oaks, 3.1., U.I.
Prouontod at the Second Meeting of the Gdllogiuu Internationale Houro~
Payehophnrnacologicun, Basal, July 1960.

1?: 7/60

�Probles:

_ihis study or the node of action at soae er the never
psychotropic agents was teraulated within the tranework of a
neurophysielogie—adaptive hypothesis (1). The concept, derived
from earlier work on oonvulsive therapies (2), views clinical
behavioral change as a resultant of the interaction of alterations
in brain function and the personality of the subject. the
,present study enphasises the question or pattern specificity
of drug action and its relation to individual differences in
behavioral response. The partieelar drugs utilised, ehler»
proaasine (3) and iaipranine (h), were selected on the basis
of pilot studies in this institution in which their ettectiveu
nose in altering physiologic and behavioral patterns had been
demonstrated.

this preeentatien is
currently in progress.

an

interil report

of a study

�hethed:
VIGonseestiye

referrals for

drug

adninistratien in a

voluntary psychiatric hospital were assigned at render to
one of the three drug regimens - (1) ohlorpronasine with
1.21 preoyelidine added, (2) inipraaine, and a (3) plaeebo.
Hedioatien vas adainietered in liquid vehicle in a fixed
dosage schedule, to a saxiaua in tour weeks. chlorproaasine was
begun at 300 as. and increased to 1200 :3. daily and iaipraaine
tree 75 to 300 as. Patients continued to be seen three times
weekly in individual payohotherapeatio interviews during the
period of drug treataent.
Analysis of the data is liaited to the first us cases.
These patients are notohrenioally ill - the majority being
adaitted for their first hospitalisation free the ooaaenity,
and a saaller percentage rehoepitalised for a recurrence or their
illness. Their mean age was 35.5 years, and yeare of schooling
was 11.9 years. Apprexiaetel! 575 were diagnosed in the group
or sohisophrenias, 281 as affective psychoses and 15S psyche‘
neuroses and eharaoter disorders.
Patients were exaained in a four day period prior to drug
adainistration on a fixed schedule or physiological and psyche—
legieal prooederee which was repeated iering the sixth week of
drug

treataent.

�Results:
in cone of the aeaeoree with drug treataente
in the figure I. the EEG patterns aeaeored

Group changes

are

shown

--~----~--“-.
FIGURE I

..—..'.....u.

quantitatively through electronic frequency analyeie (5) show
that inipranine and ohloryronaeine differ significantly from
the control group and from each other. There was a eignificant
reduction in the total electrical activity in the inipranine
group, while there wee an increase both in the amount of slow
ahd
wave activity
the slow to test activity ratio: in the
chlorpronaeine group.
-Thc reduction in the critical flickerotueien (CPI) threehold
ie noted only for the chlorproxaaine group. Thin test
correlated with the increase in EEG elow wave activity. The
rotor tests also reflect a differential drug effect with
uneteadieeee increased by the two drugs, ﬁapping rate unaltered,
and pursuit rotor inproved only by the igipranine group. The
the
greatest change in intellectual functionihg rae scored by
no-drug group, preeeut to a leeeer degree in the iaipraaine
group and absent in the chlorprenaeine group. the lack of
equivalent changes for the drug grounsnay reflect an inhibition
of the expected practice effect.
In clinical behavior, all groups showed a reduction in
coupleinte on self-rating ae measured by the Johne napkins
Scale, with the reduction being greater for the drug groups.

�.h’
611d.
In the
load 80:10, 3 Q-Iort bohuviornl rttilg, that.
an. a qunatitt‘ivo iodnction in both tho pntaoat'n and tho

dﬁﬂttr'. 2:11:33 a: 'dcprocttun' in

tn. contrcl

ﬁhc drug grvup but

‘ot (tr

group.
#311. than. du$t indicatc s ptttorn thnt angg-ata
dittorontiul drug tcttvlﬁy, ‘horo w‘u narkad ho‘crogonuity
within tuck grvup an Oneh nonairo. Fitlrc 2 pluts at. ohnngca

------”--‘
FIGURE 2

ouudunouca

in ctr tar itch aubaoe‘. rho nunbtr within Ouch ban rotort. the 07:1tatton o: n «inn;- tn bahnviur, rated on t tour-point
.031. by sh. ovnlnuting pnynhtutrtnt. it... ‘20 glohnl ch18...
13 bchuvior ratiuga, and gr. not uncocaarily‘oquavglnnt #0
rating. it ingrQVCIdnt. (lot. that £ho ratttan c: habnvtorul

'3' tld 'h' IIII

aunt often ussoctutcd with ehnngnl 1n
err-o: uni. than on. cycle)
Althodgh tbs d1£t¢rcnoo in 3033 err near. botviun
'tltpruutno and tho «Chiral group van tot signitiegnt, 6h:
atttorcnco 1: vartthtltﬁy (1 ratio) III utgnizicgnt (p .o;).
admiral
It.
gran; unused u narruv r.n¢c at chgngo, vnryiu;
chaago

Iran
tron

to n! 31:10:. In contrast; tut Slipranlno xrtup :;n¢od
+2 tn -5 grains, and chlarpzalnsinn (ran not. to -6 cyclan.
Ina chlorprunalinn stump chang- vas a: Shh downward atroction
only. the 1nd£v1dnu1 dittorono¢n ta thn t1¢irtiiill If G?!
tarantula 1:. .13d ohaorvahln 13 thn olaotro.ncopha10¢raph1¢
«an... run:- 3 an: tho clung“ 1a a. :1» u
no «any;
+1

an

�-5...

ﬁ.‘ﬂ---‘ﬂ“.119333 3

O‘ﬂumnabndou

ratio demonstrating a wide range in changes fer the controls,
a eiailar pattern tor the 1a1praaine group, but a change in
enly one direction that of increaaed slewing fer the chlorpreaaaina sweep. The teen increase in elev wave activity
for the ehlorpreaaaine group was more than 15 tines that or
—

the central and 1a1praaine groupe. there was also a
aignifieant relation between the increaee in aloe wave
activity and increasing age with chlorpreaaaine - elder

patiente being late eneceptible te naxinna change.

�Dieeeeeion:

psychological and £36 findings ehoe that the
agente etudied affect theee randomly eeleoted eubjecte
differentially, producing drug-epocitio epoctroae or change
eooree. This deeonotration or drug epocitic profiles
based on multiple tests supports previoue statements by ouch
The

(7), and Klenaan et al (8).
It ehould be noted, however, that theee toot ecore profiles
are contingent on population ohareoterietioa and not eolely
on the biochemical propertiee e: the agente tested. While
no adeqoete delineation of eelient population oheraoterietice
ie available, two general eohenata are in nee ~ the diagnoetio
neaenclatore, and the concept or I"tax-got eynpteae'. leither
ooheee adequately retleete population oharaoterietioe, and
further otudiee of multivariate behavioral, phyeiologio end
peyohelogio oharaoterietioe are neeeeeary for each delineation.
It in thee imperative that drug etodiee utilise more detailed
analyses or pretreataent psychological and physiological
toentioning. In the abeenoe or euoh aethodological refinements,
the present confueing and contradictory data about ”drug
effects", "paradoxical reactions“, and iapeted epeoiiicitiee
will continue.
workere ao Wikler

(6),

Lohmann

�Conclueieﬁ:
(1) ~Psttern

speeifieities
identified for group dsts.

1n

vsrieus tasks can be

differencss
individusl
various
Within
groups,
(2)
to
dsts
sons
for
group
to
failure
be
lesding
great,
as:
of
Further
explorstien
differences.
sehisve signifiesnt
some
using
usrrsntsd,
is
for
subjects
psttsra speeitities
of the nets recent ststistiesl techniques at nultivsrists
snslysis.
or
clusters
for
Bush
(3)
pattern speeitieities
of
psychistrie
ordering
he
nssniugful
we:
nsre
s
nsy
sabjsets
nsselegiesl
eenventiensl
thsa
studies
evaluative
for
subjects

methods.

.

(h) ﬁreup dsts fer use, err and behsvier sre eensistent
with nearephysielsgie-sdspt1ts views 9! drug therspeutic

etilesey.

�‘8REFEREHGES

tho
Action
or
of
Thoory
Enitiod
Physiodynonic
i
Thoropioo. J. Hillaido IOIE. é; 197~206, 1957.
2. link, H: Effect of Anticholinorgio Gonpoundo on Poot~
convulsivo BEG ond Behavior of Psychiatric Potionto.
E30 6113. lcurophyoiol. $3: 359-369, 1960
3. Pink, H., Show, 3., Grout, G. and Calcium, 1.8.
Corporativo Study of chlorprouojino onc Insulin Geno in
the therapy or Poychoéis. J. inor. nod. Aoooc. ;§gs
18h6~18§0, i958.
h. rink, H: Electroencephalographic and Behavioral
Effects of Torronil. Gonna. Pczch. Assoc. J. g. 166$~1718,

1. rink,

K:

1959.

Blott, G.A., Ind Lootfcl, 3.6. A new resonator1ntogrotor unit for the antarctic brain wave onolyaor.
Clio. Houroghzaiol., g} 113-115, 1953.
6. Viklor, A.: 2&amp;0 Relation of Pazchiotrz to Phornocologz,
an. a Wilkins, Boltinoro, 1957.
Lohnonn, B.E. and Crank, 3.: Bittorontioi scrocning or
Phronotropic Agents in Hon. J. Olin. Razor. Pczchogothol.
EEG

lg:

222—235, 1957.

Klornan, 0.1., Dixaccio, L., ﬁrocnblott, K. and Rinkol, H:
the Influence of Specific Personality Pottcrnc on the

Effects of Phrcnotropio Agents. Biological Pazchiotrz,
Gruno

&amp;

Strottcn,

New

York, 22h-239, 1959.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2814">
                <text>Neuropsychologic response patterns of some psychotropic drugs. In E. Rothlin (ed.), Neuro-psychopharmacology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1961, 2:381-4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2815">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2816">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-50-016</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2817">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2818">
                <text>Pollack, Max; Karp, Eric; Krauthamer; Klein, Donald F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2819">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2820">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2821">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. REPRINTED FROM E.ROTHLIN (Editor) NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY VOL. 2 (1961). Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum Basle 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2822">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2823">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74484">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81045">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87606">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94167">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="233" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="24">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/796682f73a8899c60e07650432e2be6b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>47708d42bc2c57225df86d2abf4a24c9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100650">
                    <text>W“
m
mate” om'
n“,
0"

a:

“e,

x

I!

‘e

swam mature:

M Md."

'ene

etmluletlon or the tune and the head.w1th
cuteneeue etilull e ceneleteht pattern or reepanee hee been oheerved
1a which errore in perception ere Ib’. frequent an the head then on
the reae. In thle ﬂeet eltuetlon the reee 1e eeld to he dullnent
over the head. the pettern or teoe dullnenhe cen he found in nah-e1
end eohleophrenle ednlte hue 1e verticalerlr evident in petleute
with oreehle eentel eyndruee end in children 3 to 6 yeere or eye.
rhe pattern wee eo eoneplouohe thet 1t pranpted as to etuay different
etilulue ooehauetlohe in order to detehelhe whether eoneletent
petterue occur for body part: other then the reee end head.
The eehhod at heeelns 1n hhe preeent etudr wee elesler to
theh deeorlhed prevtouely. The euhjeet wee requeeted to alone hle
eyee end twh perte at the had: were teuohed eteulteneauely. he wee
eehed whet he felt end to loanltee the eel-ﬁll.
Teenty heeleute with arsenlo wentel eyndehee due to altruee
Meet» at the brain formed the sun group or etheote . The following
pert: or the body were etudledz tece, ehoulder. head. heck. hreeet,
ehdalen. aenltel eeglou. buttock, thigh end toot. All #5 peeelble
ouehlnetlone between these body perks were heeted e9 the: eeeh or
the ereee wee teeted 1n ouehtnetlon with every other eree. fen heehe
or eeoh cuehlnetloh were done in every petlent in e tench-leed cheer.
!heee included teetlnz the body ereee 1n hath hetereloeoue end
haeoleterel reletlohehlpe. Flee hundred and tart: teat: or elehlteneune
0n elwulteneoue

etheuletlon were done

on each

patient.

eeoond group of 178* euhgeote eoneletlhs at 660 nereel edulte,
58! echleopheenlo edulte end she patiente with arsenic hence: eyhdrnee
A

�studied. the etheote in theee groove eere teeted with
eiualteheoue etinnli out not in en hen: oomhinetione ee eee done in

were eleo

the previoue group. Only 13 or the t5 poeeihle bod: continetione
were studied end different groove of petiente were need for each

continetion.

it leeet lo teete were done on every patient.

Pertiouler

ettention eel directed to the initiel reeponee.
the reeponeee on eilnlteneoue teeting in ell euhjeote fell into
two senerel groupe. rhe etheot either reported both eti-oli
correctly or reported only one etieulue ooereotly end either did not
perceive the eeoond eti-ulue (extinotion) or'nielooelieed it

(diepleoeeent). rho totel number or errors in peroeption over one
pert or the body ee ooeoeteo to the other part of the body in eeoh
continetion eere euelyeed by etetietioel lethode.
In the tiret group or 20 petiente with orgenie heeiu dieeeee
teeted h: the aethod of multiple triele there were 27 oolhinetione
in ehioh the difference in the mocha: of extinction end dieoleoenent
in the two body perte teeted eee etetietioelly eicnirieent. this
occurred in ell continetione in ehioh one or the two perte nee the
reee, the genital tone (nele end tenele), or the head. In the
continetione involving the teoe or the cenitel none errore ih per»
oeption were more frequent in pert: or the body other then theee bod:
ereee. the (poo end the genital zone ney be eeid to he dolinent to
ell other ereee or the body. In combinetione involving the head
there eere uooeerrore in peroeption or the head etinnlue then in en:
other pelted part or the body. ‘rhe hand new be eeid to be the leeet
dolinlnt are. or the body. there were four additional combinationin which dominance wee Innifeeted. !he hottook wee doniuent over
the heok aha ehoulder. the breeet wee dolinent over the heck, end the
heck lee douinlht over the thigh.

�3.
4‘.“

in anniyuil of tho rcspensca or and accend group at pitiontn
with organic Iantal nvndrunn who HUI. touted in u tingle bady
ounbinatien with.» than in multiplt culbinltions ahowua a liliilr
pattern. inn». unto I few important axooptionn howrvor. who race
an: round to b. otvonsly dominant ever tha genital tout, the foot
duuinunt over the thigh And tho buttock duninant over tho fact.

..
_

they. relationuhipu wart not tpplront in in. group or patients tottod
by tn. Inthod of multiple trials.
Th. foregoing rcuuits that that an inns. or duubic uinuitanaaul
”manna in panama um auntie mm, swarm. the "rim
part: or the bear cxhibit a infinite volttianship to on. another:
ﬁhin 1i aunitoutcd hi Vlrvins accrue or dnlinnnoc which.lay ht can~
Iidorod a: gradient 0: nonnation. it the top of en. gridiont in
V

'

.
m «um Ian. in slightly 1.» doninnnt um the he.

the mu.
but in dalinnnt «var all other part: of tn. bad: and i: thnrgby tho
host bad: tron in tho order of dalinanoc. it tho 9th.! 0nd of tho
gradient is en. hand. In. runninins aria. at thu body tail bctuoon
tho no. Ind
um and an acne. mu. body pm. mud
in oeubinntion Iii: «ﬂab other failed. for tho most part, to yield
differtnoos in duninuaoc’cnous than other. Th0 combinstionl in which
daninanoc who Innitontod showed a tondcncy for the hulbek, than-0n.
brains, and taat to ho tho mare dominant part: uni tho hack. magniﬁer,
denim“ par:- within this ﬁrm.
rand cum to be the
In tun series or nanlni and nahisophrcnie adult: that. uvrc
only tun «albinationl in uhieh Eh. dirrorgnoo in the number at error:

men

in“

between the two

ptrti ati-ulatod it! statintioclly significant.

duninant over eh. bruit: and the brnant wax dominant ovar
tn. hind. In both instance: in. pitttrn or danintnoa in: ailiitr
to that Icon in patient: with organic anneal Iyndrnnn.

Th. rhea

III

�m mm or ammo. duomtmtod by suntan-m "Inns
in ﬂinch the no. Ind tho him! for! 2!!! at"... of I Mont

the body pain hu :1» been dam-tum 1n mucosa other
than than with eman- «mm. or the mean. when include nomx
01:11am 3 to 6
or m, nut-t1 adults with transient damnation
or the built: an. to imam“,
unamor
among

m

«lacuna-hook therapy, in!
under 7 your: . not all th-

:utnum

mu,

ma), «noun Mult- with mum use
ymine we: ombmuona have been

«an: Mu.

ﬂavour, at then ammun- um
have been smut! a pattern 1: atom: in mm the no. 13 the
most dominant m: and ﬂu hind the lone 60.1mm.
for n the»:
to
«at: u. mm or 4mm“ mun,
none in
It appear. to b. an inherent ”turn 9:
organization within the mm}. ”an“: man 1.. exaggerated in
tested in than

'

u
«than.

patient:

an:

u m

«an. or the pram.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2324">
                <text>Order of dominance in cutaneous perception. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1952; 56 (77th Meeting): 238-40. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2325">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2326">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-7a-010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2327">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2328">
                <text>Green, M.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Bender, M.B.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2329">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2330">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2331">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2332">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2333">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74435">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80996">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87557">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94118">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="227" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/abb942c109b57ff8986a7757e43563c2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>23a7bbd876571d7517224c266ad15ea2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100644">
                    <text>Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous
Tests of Face and Hand
_

N...”- —-.

MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
MAX

FINK, MD.
AND

MARTIN GREEN, M.D.
NEW YORK

Reprinted from the Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
Septmnber 1951, Vol. 66, pp. 355-362
COPYRIGHT, 1951, .‘BY
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
535 NORTH DEARBORN STREET
CHICAGO 10, ILL.

Printed and Published in the United States of America

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and
Psychiatry
September 1951, Vol. 66, pp. 355-362
Copyright, 1951, by American. Medical Association

PATTERNS IN PERCEPTION ON SIMULTANEOUS
TESTS OF FACE AND HAND
MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
MAX

FINK, MD.
AND

MARTIN GREEN, M.D.
NEW YORK

it
PREVIOUSLY was shown that examination of the cutaneous modalities by
the method of double simultaneous stimulation
elicited defects in perception
which were not apparent on single stimulation.
The defects, described as “extinction,” “obscuration,” “displacement,” and “allesthesia,”
were observed in groups of
patients with localized or diffuse disease of the central
nervous system.1 In each
group the defects in cutaneous perception obtained on double simultaneous stimula—
tion were most apparent in the hand and least in
the face. The object of the present
investigation was to determine the patterns of
in normal subjects, adults
responses
and children to simultaneous stimulation of the face
and hand—the “face—hand”
test.2 The observations on this normal
were then compared to some extent
group
with the responses of patients with
organic mental syndromes, aphasia, and schizophrenia.
MATERIAL

The “normal” subjects were children and adults.
These subjects were persons attending
hospital clinics in whom there was no evidence of disease
of the brain, and school children, staff
personnel, and students, in whom there was no manifest disorder
of the central nervous system.
None of them had been examined previously
by the method of double simultaneous stimulation.
From the Department of Neurology and
Psychiatry, New York University College of
Medicine; Bellevue Hospital, and the Mount Sinai Hospital.
This work was aided (in part) by a research
grant from the National Institutes of Health,
United States Public Health Service, and (in
part) by a grant from the Coordinating Council
of Cerebral Palsy in New York City, Inc.
1. (a) Bender, M. B., and
F'urlow, L. T.: Phenomenon of Visual Extinction
in
Homonymous Fields and Psychologic Principles Involved, Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 53:29—33
(Jan) 1945. (b) Bender, M. B.: Extinction and Precipitation of Cutaneous
Sensations, ibid.
54:1—9 (July) 1945; (c) The
Phenomenon of Sensory Displacement, ibid.
65:607-621
1951.
(May)
(d) Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F and Schappell, A. W.:
.,
Extinction
Phenomena
in Hemiplegia, ibid. 62:717-724 (Dec.) 1949.
(e) Bender, M. B. ; Wortis, S. B., and Cramer,
J.:
Organic Mental Syndrome with Phenomena of Extinction
and Allesthesia, ibid. 59:273-291
(March) 1948. (f) Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F., and
Teuber, H. L.: Allesthesia and
Disturbance of Body Scheme, ibid. 62:222-231
(Aug) 1949. (g) Bender, M. B., and Nathanson,
M.: Patterns in Allesthesia and Their Relation
to Disorder of Body Scheme and Other
Sensory Phenomena, ibid. 64:501—515 (Oct) 1950.
2. Bender, M. B.; Fink, M., and
Green, M.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests
of the Face and Hand, Tr. Am. Neurol. A.
75:250—252, 1950.

�2
The subjects were divided into three groups according to age: children of 3 to 6, and 7 to 12
yr., and “adults” over 12 yr. of age.
For comparison with the normal group, we studied patients in the wards of the Bellevue
Psychiatric Hospital. They were divided into three groups on the basis of their disease—
schizophrenia, organic psychoses, and aphasia. No attempt was made to study separately the
clinical types of schizophrenia. Most of the patients had the paranoid, mixed, or simple variety
of schizophrenia. The patients with organic mental changes showed defects in memory,
orientation, andcalculation, as well as other signs and symptoms. characteristic of diffuse
disease of the brain. The clinical diagnoses for most of thesegpatients was Alzheimer’s’ disease,
arteriosclerotic encephalopathy, severe cerebral trauma, brain tumor, or toxic encephalopathy.
The subjects with aphasia were those who showed characteristic difﬁculties in communication.
Those who had concomitant hemiparesis or ‘a hemisensory defect noticeable on single stimulation
were not included in this series.
MET HOD

The subject was instructed to close the eyes. When this was done, the face (cheek) and
either the ipsilateral or the contralateral hand (any part of the hand or digits) were simultaneously touched or stroked with the examiner’s ﬁngers. The subjects reported either one or two
sensations. When only one percept was reported, the subject was asked if there was still
another and, if so, to indicate its location and quality.
After the initial trial, in each subject, the opposite cheek and hand were stimulated in the
same manner. These tests were repeated and the results recorded, until the subjects consistently
reported both stimuli correctly. In those subjects who failed to localize the two stimuli
correctly ‘after six or eight trials, other parts of the body were tested in such combinations as
face-face, hand-hand, face-breast, or penis-hand, these stimulations alternating with the facehand test.
In a second, separate series of studies, pinprick stimuli were used in a similar fashion. In
both series, care was taken to app-1y the stimuli at the same time and with the same intensity.
It was apparent that subjects who made consistent errors in reporting would be correct as
soon as the stimuli were applied consecutively rather than simultaneously, even if the time lag
between stimuli was that of one or two moments. It was also necessary to use naive normal
subjects, since subjects previously tested did not show the patterns noted below.
RESULTS

The responses obtained on the face-hand test fell into four groups: (a) a touch
sensation on the face and the hand, indicating the correct and expected perception;
(b) a touch sensation on the face only, implying no sensation in the hand; (6) a
touch sensation on both sides of the face, and (d) a touch sensation on the hand
only, implying none on the face. When only one stimulus was reported, the subject
was asked if: there was any other sensation. The occasional reply was that there was
another percept, and the subject correctly pointed to the second locus. Many subjects, however, reported that they had not perceived another stimulus, usually
adding the statement: “I was not paying attention; do it again,” or, “I’m not sure;
maybe it was somewhere over here,” and pointing in the direction of the side of the
body of the poorly felt stimulus. In some instances, while correctly localizing the
second percept, they volunteered the statement: “It was not as strong as the other
one,” or “It doesn’t seem as sharp.”
Before we proceed with the results, we must deﬁne the special terms used. In
other communications the failure of the subject to report one of two simultaneously
applied stimuli has been called “the phenomenon of sensory extinction,” or “extinction.” 1”“ b The part of the body where the stimulus was perceived is said to be
“dominant” to the part of the body where the simultaneous stimulus was not per—
ceived, or perceived faintly. The latter diminution in the quality of a sensation was
'

�3.

termed “obscuration.” When the subject reported two sensations, but mislocalized
one of them, the “displacement” of a percept is said to have occurred.1c Displacements are usually in the direction of the dominant stimulus and may be partial or
complete. The displacements noted in this series were from the hand to the cheek
of the same side. Rarely did the displacements occur to the neck or shoulder.
Initial Trial—The results were analyzed from the standpoint of initial and
subsequent trials. On the initial trial of the face-hand test with touch stimulation
in normal subjects, face dominance was apparent in all age groups. More than half
of such normal adults reported the sensation in the face and none in the hand. Three
subjects mislocalized the sensation in the hand to the face. In the groups of normal
children, 90% under the age of 6 yr. reported only the face percept or mislocalized
the hand percept to the face. This pattern of face dominance is also seen in the
children from 7 to 12 yr. of age, but to a less extent.
Of the normal subjects, ﬁve adults reported the hand stimulation only on the
initial trial. N 0 example of displacement from face to hand was noted.
This pattern of face dominance by hand extinction or by displacement of the
hand percept to the face was even more apparent in the patients examined. It was
most evident in patients with organic mental changes, 93% of whom did not report
TABLE

l.—Response to Touch Stimulation on Initial Trial

Normal adult ...........................
Normal child, 3-6 yr .....................
Normal child, 7-12 yr ....................
Schizophrenia (unclassiﬁed) ............
Organic mental syndrome ...............
Aphasia .................................

Total
160
56
76
74
120
23

Correct
Responses
77
10
38
26
9

12

Face Only
75
28
27
45
94
11

Face-Face Hand Only
3
18
9

5
0

1

2

14

3

O

O

2

both stimuli correctly. In examinations of schizophrenic subjects and patients with
aphasia, responses similar to those of the normal adult were observed in the initial
trial.
Hand dominance was occasionally seen in the patient and rarely in the normal
subject. In cases of hand dominance the subject reported the hand, but not the face,
percept. It was seen in the initial trial in ﬁve normal adults. These subjects
reported both stimuli correctly on subsequent testing. In the patients with organic
mental changes hand dominance was an inconstant response, and repeated testing
the same day, or on subsequent days, demonstrated the more usual persistent
pattern of face dominance.
Subsequent Thain—Of the 83 normal adults who made errors on the initial
trial, 43 made correct responses on the second trial and 12 on the third trial. In a
few subjects, four, ﬁve, or six trials were necessary before the two stimuli were
correctly localized. These subjects were assumed to be normal, although complete
psychological tests were not made. It was noted that anxiety (tension during
examination or a strong desire to please) interfered with the early correct recog—
nition of the stimuli. In all normal subjects, including those with anxiety, once the
correct response was obtained (even after many trials with errors), it was elicited
on all subsequent testing. It seemed as though a number of trials was necessary for

�4

the subject to get into the “set” of the examination, and
that, once in the set, he
reported the stimuli accurately, even after the lapse of
many days.
In testing the normal young child, it was apparent that in most
cases many trials
were necessary before the correct response was consistently elicited. Also, the child
did not always give a correct response on subsequent
testing. Repeated testing over
many days, however, elicited the same patterns of face dominance. .This was noted
in 36 of the 56 children tested. In a number of instances
the child watched the
application of the stimuli and thus reported the perceptions correctly. But
as soon
as the test was repeated with the eyes closed, the child again
reported only one
stimulus. It was evident that the child could not
get into the “set” of the examination, even with visual cues.
This difﬁculty was not very apparent in all children. In the older
(ages
group
7 to 12 yr.) only 17 of the 76 failed to give the
correct response after the initial few
trials.

A\\A

A\4*A\
‘~

90

‘___-c\‘ ~ ‘c____ .¢—————-—._—_——__———-—c

89

Responses

70

60
Dominant

Face

50

Organic Mental Syndrome

c--c Children, age 5 to 6
o——o Schizophrenic Adult
Normal Adult

40

%
50
20
10

1

2

3

4

5

6

10

Responses to face~hand test on initial and subsequent trials.

The responses obtained on repeated trials of the face-hand
tests in normal sub—
jects also followed a consistent pattern. As on the initial trial, face dominance
was
prevalent in all subjects. It was manifest either by (a) extinction
or obscuration
of hand stimuli or (b) displacement of hand stimuli
to the face, or, in several
instances, in a direction toward the face.
In contrast to normal adults, patients with organic mental
changes were unable
to report the two stimuli correctly, even after
many trials. When the patient
reported the percept in one test correctly, he frequently failed on
subsequent testing. It was also apparent that testing on subsequent days still elicited
displacement
and extinction of stimuli. This is in strong contrast to the
responses of apparently
normal subjects, who seldom made an error on subsequent
trials, days after the
initial examination. The responses obtained in this
group demonstrated the patterns of face dominance in most of the tests. Displacement of the hand
percept to

�5

the face was frequent. In some instances displacement or extinction was
present
despite the fact that the patient watched the application of the stimuli to the face
and hand. Extinction was very common on homolateral or heterologous testing,
while displacement was apparent mostly on heterologous testing.
The schizophrenic and the aphasic patients gave reports which were similar to
those of normal adults. After the ﬁrst two trials percentage of error in hand sensation
was slightly higher than in the normal group. Persistent bizarre responses were
elicited from a number of the schizophrenic subjects. These
reports included mul—
tiple responses to single or double stimuli, persistent displacements to one area from
any other body area, and mirror reversals of localization. These were inconsistent
during an examination and from day to day. As with the normal adults, testing the
schizophrenic or aphasic subject on consecutive days failed to elicit extinction
phenomena once the test had accurately been reported before.
A comparison of the responses of each of these groups to multiple testing is
shown in the accompanying chart.
Pinprick Stimulation—It is known that the type of stimulus applied inﬂuences
the results in perception. To demonstrate the importance of this factor, similar
groups of subjects were tested using two pinprick stimuli instead of two touch

M
TABLE 2,—Respoinse

to Pinprick Stimulation an Initial Trial

Normal adult
...........................
Normal child, 3-6 yr
.....................
Normal child, 7-12 yr
....................
Schizophrenia
...........................
Organic mental syndrome
...............

Correct

Total

Responses

Face Only

68
45
39
50
49

51
16
25

15
26
14

36
9

'

13
33

Face-Face Hand Only
2

0

2

1

0
0
3

0
1

2

stimuli. With pinprick stimulation of the face and hand, face dominance
was again
manifest in all the groups. However, the incidence of error in perception of
the
pinprick in the hand was lower than that with a touch stimulus. The results are
recorded in Table 2.
Repeated testing with two pins in the'normal adult subjects elicited the correct
responses in the intial three trials. Fewer of the children failed to report the test
accurately after the initial trials. It was possible in a number of instances to alternate touch and pinprick stimulations and to demonstrate extinction to touch, but
correct localization to pinprick. Moreover, with more intense pinprick stimulation,
extinction and displacement were less frequently observed.
These phenomena, namely, extinction and displacement, were even more
apparent in the patients with organic mental syndromes. Displacement of touch stimu—
lation could be alternated with correct localization of pinprick stimulation. A
combination of touch to the face and pinprick to the hand evinced the combination
of displacement and obscuration, as the patient reported “a touch
on the face, and
a dull one on the other side (of the face).” Pinprick to the cheek and touch to the
hand resulted in extinction of the hand percept. or, occasionally, the
report of a
pinprick on both the cheek and the hand.
The schizophrenic subjects were able to localize the pinprick stimulus accurately
after the initial few trials, as had the normal adults.

�6
COMMENT

By using the method of double simultaneous stimulation in tests of the face and
the hand, a consistent pattern of responses has been observed in a variety of sub—
jects. The stimulus to the face is more readily perceived than the one to the hand.
Moreover, the face percept inﬂuences the hand percept, frequently causing the displacement of sensation. This pattern of responses has been repeatedly demonstrated
in both the normal and the abnormal subjects and is manifest in extinction, obscuration, and displacement. Extinction is most, and displacement is least, frequent. In
extinction, the face percept is correctly reported as to quality and locus, but the
hand stimulus is not perceived at all. In all the foregoing tests of patient or normal
subjects, whether the responses were accurate or not, it was noted that the subject

almost invariably pointed to the faceixsti‘mulus ﬁrst. Occasionally the hand percept
was perceived and correctly localized, but assumed a qualitative difference, always
of diminution. In displacement the stimulus to the hand was mislocalized to the
face, or in the direction of the face, e. g., to the shoulder or neck. In some instances
if the face and the hand of the same side were stimulated, the subject occasionally
reported two sensations in the face. None of these phenomena was haphazard.
While the frequency with which any one of these effects was observed might be
affected by attention, drugs, or variation in stimuli, its pattern was consistent.
These responses to the face-hand test are modiﬁed by many factors. Some of the
inﬂuencing factors are (a) attention, (b) age of subject, (c) simultaneity of stimuli,
(d) type of stimulus, (e) strength of stimulus, (f) locus of stimulation, and (9)
internal state of organism. These factors may alter the frequency with which extinc—
tion and displacement appear, but they do not change the pattern of face dominance.
The subject’s awareness of the test is a major factor in the appearance of the
phenomenon of extinction. Both attention and previous experience can bring stimuli
to awareness. In a series of 20 adults who were informed that two stimuli were to
be applied, none showed extinction of percepts. Because previous experience can
inﬂuence a response, it was necessary to record the ﬁndings on initial trial in naive
subjects. By this method the factor of previous experience was minimized. At the
same time, the subject was not apt to be on the “alert” for the number of stimuli he
was to receive. Consequently, one might say that the reason the subject perceived
only one stimulus, or perceived one stimulus and displaced the percept of the other,
is that he was not paying attentio‘n.3 This criticism may be valid, but the signiﬁcant
fact is that the error was always made in the hand and not in the face. If it were
mere inattention, one would expect 50% of the single responses to double simultaneous stimulation to be in the hand and 50% in the face. But this type of chance
error was not observed. Of the single responses to double simultaneous stimulation,
95% were of the face percept and 5% of the hand percept. This pattern of face
dominance or hand extinction was further established during subsequent examinations. Moreover, when displacement was seen in normal subjects, it was to the face
and not to the hand.
This pattern of face dominance to double simultaneous stimulation was found
to be exaggerated in normal young children, of whom 83% demonstrated either
hand extinction or displacement of the hand percept to the face on the initial trial.
Critchley, M.: The Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference to
Parietal Lesions, Brain 72:538—561, 1949.
3.

�7

Moreover, this high percentage of responses of face dominance persisted on sub—
sequent trials. In the older children, also, face dominance was consistently demon—
strable. It was noted that the younger the child, the more distinct was this
pattern
of face dominance.
Hand extinction might be attributed to an inability to perceive two stimuli at
once. This particular defect has been noted in patients with severe mental changes
by Goldstein.4 However, in patients with severe mental changes or in
chil—
young
dren stimuli applied to both cheeks, or both hands, or
any other two homologous
body areas were correctly reported as two sensations. There was neither extinction
nor displacement. Goldstein’s observation, therefore, cannot be used as an explana—
tion of hand extinction.
It is noted that face dominance was apparent no matter what type of stimula—
tion was used. Simultaneous pinprick stimulations revealed the
pattern of face
dominance, although with a lower frequency than touch stimulations. Other
cutaneous stimulation, such as application of two tuning forks or hot and cold tubes,
repetitive rubbing, and repetitive pinprick stimulation, was used, and face dominance
was manifest regardless of the cutaneous stimulation employed.
The importance of the simultaneity of the stimuli has already been alluded to.
In subjects in whom extinction was persistent, consecutive application of the stimuli
invariably resulted in the perception of two stimuli. In normal adults consecutive
stimulatiOn of the face and the hand, even on the initial trial,
never resulted in
extinction.
In these studies the stimuli were of equal intensity. This factor
was important
in eliciting the pattern in the normal subject, for
unequal stimuli were seemingly
more readily perceived than equal stimuli. After the ﬁrst few trials the subject was
able to perceive the two stimuli, even if one was painful and the other
not. In
patients with organic mental changes, however, extinction and displacement were
manifest despite a wide discrepancy in the quality of the stimuli. By
altering the
strength of the stimuli, it was possible to alter the response from extinction of the
hand percept (if the hand stimulus was weak) to displacement to the cheek
(if the
hand stimulus was strong). The change from extinction to displacement
was also
elicited by altering the quality of the stimuli, that is, from touch
to'pinprick. Nevertheless, the pattern of face dominance was always apparent.
The parts of the body being simultaneously stimulated is another consideration
in studying these patterns. We have already alluded to the fact that extinction is
commonest in the hand and least in the face. In testing other body areas, the incidence of extinction and displacement is less than in testing the face and the hand.
That is, testing shoulder and thigh may not elicit extinction or obscuration, whereas
the face-hand test may. Also, in patients with lesions of the brain or spinal
cord,
the pattern of relation of the body parts to simultaneous stimulation
may be altered
in a characteristic hemisensory or “level-lesion” syndrome. Further studies
are
necessary before the signiﬁcance of the pattern can be interpreted. Any deduction
made at this time would be purely speculative. For instance, nothing is gained
by
stating that face dominance implies a rostral order of sensory dominance.5 Such a
4. Goldstein, K.:: The Mental Changes Due to Frontal Lobe
Damage, J. Psychol.

17:187, 1944.
5. Cohn, R., and Raines, G. N.: On Certain Aspects of the
Sensory Organization of the
Human Brain: A Study in Rostral Dominance ‘as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous
Stimulation, Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 74:162-168, 1949.

�8

hypothesis is contradicted by at least one fact, namely, the observation that when
the hand and foot are stimulated simultaneously the foot dominates over the hand.
Perhaps after more data are accumulated a satisfactory theory may be obtained.
SUMMARY
_. “awn—a,

elicited in normal and abnormal subjects by the method of double simultaneous
stimulation of cutaneous modalities.
Face dominance, manifest by extinction of the hand percept or by dlsplacement
0f the handmpercept to the face, is seen as a normal phenomenon, manifested1n the
normal adults andin the patients with schizophrenia and aphasia examined in the
series. It is exaggerated in young children and in patients with diffuse disease of
the brain, in whom extinction and displacement are persistent after multiple trials.
This pattern of face dominance is manifest regardless of the cutaneous modality
tested, there being a change only in the frequency of extinction with change in type
of stimulus.
j

Printed and Published in the United States of America

/ f

/

r:

L/nAJ/C’ .....

.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2264">
                <text>Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1951 Sep; 66(3): 355-62.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2265">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2266">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-2b-004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2267">
                <text>1951</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2268">
                <text>Bender, Morris B.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2269">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2270">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2271">
                <text>Reprinted from the Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry September 1951, vol. 66, pp. 355-362.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2272">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2273">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74429">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80990">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87551">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94112">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="226" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="15">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/348b7ac617e184efef2c6c30c847fca6.pdf</src>
        <authentication>36100719e5c813fdabfca556caa0ba68</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100643">
                    <text>Reprinted from
TRANSACTIONS OF THE
AMERICAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

1950

PATTERNS IN PERCEPTION ON SIMULTANEOUS TESTS OF
FACE AND HAND
MORRIS B. BENDER
MAX FINK
AND

MARTIN GREEN
NEW YORK

In previous studies we found that the method of double simultaneous
stimulation showed defects in sensation (extinction) which were not apparent on routine single stimulation. In testing two different regions of the
body and various combinations it was found that extinction was apt to
occur most often in the hand and least in the face. Conversely, “dominance”
was greatest in the face and least in the hand. In the present communication we wish to report the results obtained on simultaneous stimulation of
the face and the hand (the face-hand test) in groups of subjects with the
following conditions: 1) aphasia without hemiparesis or hemisensory syndrome; 2) aphasia with severe mental changes; 3) organic mental syn—
drome; 4) schizophrenia; 5) no disease of the brain (normal adults) and
6) normal children between the ages of four to ten years. Patients in groups
2 and 3 showed severe memory defects, confusion, poor orientation, difﬁculties in calculation and other symptoms characteristic of diffuse disease
of the brain.
Method: The subject was instructed to close his eyes. When this was
done his face (cheek) and contralateral hand (any part of the hand or
ﬁngers) were touched Simultaneously. Care was taken to make the two
stimulations of equal intensity. As soon as the stimuli were applied the
subject was asked to report what he felt, and following this, where he felt
the sensation. Identical tests were carried out with light rubbing and pin

prick stimulations.
Results: Under these conditions the subject gave either of the following
responses on the ﬁrst examination: a) a touch on the face only (face
dominance), implying no Sensation in the hand (extinction) ; b) a touch on
both sides of the face (there being “displacement” from the hand to the
ipsilateral face) ; or c) a touch on the face and contralateral hand. In the
(a) response the subject was asked whether he felt still another stimulus.
The reply was either in the negative, or there was uncertainty or vague
approximation. This question suggested to the subject that there were two
stimulations so that on subsequent tests he was expectant of more than
one stimulus.
In the (b) type of response the subject mislocalized or displaced the
sensation evoked in the hand toward the ipsilateral face. Since the mislocalization was towards the face it appeared as if the face determined the direc250

�251

Perception

in
al.——Patterns
Bender, et

of
type
a
this
was
that
therefore,
said,
be
might
It
than
tion of the displacement.
common
less
was
displacement,
or
(b),
Response
dominance.
face
the
patients
in
often
most
seen
was
(b)
Response
extinction.
or
(a)
testing.
response
repeated
despite
persisted
and
with the organic mental syndrome,
comment.
special
needs
no
and
normal
expected
the
was
face
The (c) response
ipsilateral
the
when
noted
werealso
Extinction and displacement
including
tested,
subjects
the
all
In
tested.
sides
and hand were simultaneously
left
and
right
the
between
difference
no
was
there
aphasia,
with
those
-

'

of the body.

the
in
shown
is
various
groups
the
in
obtained
results
Analysis of the

following table:

Hand

;/,’//

Group

Face Response
Extinction or
Displacement

Number of
Subjects

2

‘4

22
20

5

53

'

3

20

.

0

14

24

,

19

‘

0

6

20

'

Response

_

9
12

15
12

1

Face and Head
Response

‘

2
6
28
0

'

‘

-

0
0
0

.

j

.

l

l

of
is
dominance
there
whenever
that
obvious
is
it;
foregoing
the
From.
the
hand
in
Dominance
face.
the
in
is
it
apparent
another
over
sensation
the
in
one
"uniformly
almost
found
was
dominance
Face
once.
notedonly
did
was
patients
These
2
and
3)..
(groups
changes
mentalwithsevere
in.

_

subjects
few
a
In
repeated'testing.
after
hand
even
the
not report sensation in
were
or
stimuli,
two
were
there
told
the
were
patients
after
even
stances,
percept
one
only
reported
they
stimuli,
of
the
of
asked to watch the application
sides
both
of
stimulation
simultaneous
cases
Inthese
one.
displaced
these
that
or
objection
the
excluding
thus
correctly,
the face was reported
once.
things
at
_.
two
perceive
do
or
able
to
not
were
those
in
and
patients
with
aphasia
subjects
in
dominance
face
of
The'incidence,
in
..
patients
1 and 4) was less. In contrastto
with schizophrenia (groups
correctly
sensations
both
1
4
reported
and
in
those
groups
2» and 3,
the
hrst
groups
done
not
had
soon
if
they
trials,
fourth
third
or
second,
the
domiface
on
of.
incidence
the
5)
adults
(group
normal
of
the
In
group
the
trial.
on
found
only
it
was
though
even
signiﬁcant,
still
but
least,
dominance
nance was
face
of
incidence
the.
children
normal
of
series
In
trial.
a
dominance
ﬁrst
face
children
3.
In
2
and
young
in
groups
as
the
same
almost
was
examination.
ﬁrst
the
after
trials
several
tested
was present even
hand
were
the
than
other
body
of
the
When theface and parts
The
apparent.
still
was
dominance
face
3,
2
and
in" groups
calf,
simultaneously
thigh,
penis,
(breast),
trunk
shoulder,
face,
was
dominance
order of
hand.
and
foot, arm
.

.

_

�252

Weights
(IL—Discrimination
of
Bender, et
CONCLUSION

In a wide variety of subjects the phenomena of extinction and displace-

consistent
A
demonstrated.
stimulation
simultaneous
were
ment on double
dominant
most
face
the
which
in
was
established
of
pattern perception was
and
abnormal
the
in
both
noted
These
ﬁndings were
and the hand the least.
the normal subjects. In the abnormal subjects with severe mental changes,
be
that
consistent
they
may
extinction
were so
face dominance and hand
used as a sign of diffuse disease of the brain, but only when found to persist
after repeated examinations.
The pattern of dominance, as well as the phenomenon of extinction,
be
to
brain
diffuse
disease,
with
in
appear
patients
which are so prominent
exaggerations of the patterns found in the normal subjects, especially
children.

�um

II mama! 0'
MES 0! I‘M!

w

3mm
my-

A!

Harris 3. Bender, ILD.
Pink, IL».

m

and

lax-tin anon, LB.

of
lumbar
ﬁpi‘fﬁnﬁ
'75;
Buivenity cones. of Mieinc,
555

Sinai

City.
tort
lelpiul, In

m lupin

'

101E
law
c
ﬁy Edi-y,1 and that Haunt
3.11m.

from
the
mum;
grant
a
”starch
by
part)
(in
This work was aided
a.
by
grant
and
part)
(in
service
Public
With
of
math,
Institutes
Inc
York
.
city.
in
Cmbral
of
In
council
his:
Coordinating
the
I‘m

�1.'
Previously it was shown thst exsnihstioh of the cutaneous
uodelitiec by the method or double siuultsneous etisnlstion
elicited defects in perception which were not sppsrent on single
“extinctiont”
”obscuration,”
The
ss
defects,
desctihed
etihhlstion.
"displacement” and "eliesthesis'.were observed in groups of
or
the centrsi nervous
disesse
diffuse
with
localixed
or
patients
systen (1) (a) (3). In esch group the defects in cutaneous per»
most
were
stimulation
double
sismitsneous
obtsined
on
ception
of
the
rhe
fece.
hand
the
sud
object
in
the
lesst
in
appsrent
or
the
was
responses
determine
to
patterns
investigation
present
in nonnsi subjects, sduits and children,to simultaneous stisu1s~
Yarns
"fece~hs.nd”
observe~
head
and
teat
the
face
of
the
tion
tions in this nonnsl group were then cospsred to sole extent with
the responses of pstients with orgshic mental syndrases, sphssis
sud cchisophrenis.
IAEIR£égc

the ”non-s1“ subjects were children and sdulte.

These

there.

subjects were persons attending hcspitsl clinics, in
was no evidence or disesce or the brsin; and school children, start
of
disorder
manifest
who:
no
was
there
sud
in
students,
personnel
been
had
Hone
of
then
previously
system;
the central nervous
exslined by the nethod or double sisultsneous stimulation. the
to
according
sge:
three
into
groups
classified
were
subjects
12
“adults”
end
6
over
end
years.
7
to
3
children or to
it years,
For comparison with the noml goup we studied patients on
'There
were three
Bellevue
wards
of
Psychiatric
the
iospitsl.
the
sod
lo
attempt
sphssis.
psychoses
~
organic
schizophrenia,
group:
whom

�2.
.uno and. to separately study each or the clinionl typo: of
schisophronil. ﬂoat of tho puticntu ours or the paranoza, mixed
or iinplc vurietiel of Iohixophrenin. the patient: uith organic
montnl changes showed doreota 1n nonorw, orient¢t1on and

onloulution, a: wall In other signs and symptom: oharuoteriltio
or dxtruoo dileIIO of tho brain. Tho clinical diagnoael in loot
of,those onuou was Althoincr'n dilt&amp;§c, urtorionolcrotio onoop~
haloputhy, severe oorobrll ordain, brain tumor or toxic ano¢p~
who
with
thou
mm
uphuu.
lubjootl
mommy.
ohnrnotcriltio difficultiob in columnioation. Theta who had a
oonoolitant hmnipnroail or I huuiscnlory aorta? noticeable on
single Itilnlation war. not inorudod in thin Curios.

m

'3th

maroon:

2h: subject val instruotcd to‘olouo tho cyan. When thia
1p3111tcéll
(chock)
and
tho
oontrav
done
or
either
tho-root
it:
our.
hand
ninnltnnooully
on.
(any
hand
digit.)
at
or
part
lateral
touohcd or stroked with tho examiner‘s ringorl. the subject:
whoa
two
sonsntionn;
only one percept
one
or
either
reported
no: reported tho subject was naked 1: than. at: 3:111 unothor,
and 1: no, to indiooto its loontion and quality.
Following the initial trial, in each subject, tho opposite
chuck Ind hand aura stimulatod 1n the 1.80 nunnor. Those tout:
poquepoatod and tho result: reoordod, until tho subject: oon~
who
those
In
both
auhjootl
otinnli
correctly.
nistontly roportod
toiled to localize tho two Itinuli oorruotly otter at: or eight
word
an
touted
t1oo~ttoc,'hand~
body
the
of
0th.:
part:
triala,
room-hand
tho
with
uumung
ma, “mama, penis-hand, em,

tout.

�otinuleé
eerie! ot.stndies pin prick
tions sere used in s sinilsr fsshion.w In both series, cere use
taken to apply the stimuli at the me time and with the em
thst'snhdects
who‘nede consistentt
was
spherent
intensity. It
he
would
correct as soon es the stinuli were
errors in reporting
rsther
thsn sinnltsneoutly, even if the
spplied consecutively
tine leg betseen stinuli was that or one or two nonente. It was
slso necesssry to use neive norssl subjects, since sthects
previously tested did not show the.petterns noted below.

In e second sepsrste

8

ones;

lhe responses obtained on the tnce~hsnd test fell into four
groups: (s) s touch on the face and the hsnd, indicstins the
correct end expected perception; (h) e touch on the fees only,
in
the head; (c) I touch on both sides or
implying no eensstion
the tees: and (d) s touch on the bend only, implying none on the
race. ﬂhen only one stimulus III reported the subject use ssked
if there uss any other sensstion. the oocesionsl reply sue that
there use snother percept, and the sthsct correctly pointed to
the second locus. lhny hdhaects, however, reported thst they hsd
not perceived snother stimulus, neuslly sdding the state-cut: ”In
use not paying sttention - do it seein' or, ”I'm not sure - Isvhe
of
here"
end
somewhere
the
the
was
direction
in
over
pointing
it
side of the body or the poorly felt stimulus. In some instances,
second
while correctly locslising the
percept, they Iinnteered
the ststenent: "It use not es strong es the other one,“ or "It
doesn't seen as sharp.”
Before we proceed with the results we rust define the
connnnicstions
other
the failure or the
need.
In
special terns

�#.

luhjoet to report ohm or two ninnltnnmaunly applied stimuli ha:
of
been called “tbs phhnhnenon
gunnery extinction“ hr ”extinction“
1n
utid
wharu
stinmlu;
tho
poreeived
or
body
the
(1). the part
Ill
uxnultanuhulh
to he "danihnnt” ta the part of thh body where thn
Itinnlun nun net perceived, or parceivcd faintly. the latter
aensatieh
was terncd ”obnouration.'
or
a
the
diminution in
quality
whah tho uuhject ruparted tun nonnatiehn, hut ninloenlilod one or
thun, the "ditplhccncnt' a: a peroapt in .315 to hire oeeurrea (2).
ndsplaccnentu Ir. ununlxy 1n the direction or tht daninnnt
’ntinnxup and as: he puttinl hr eqnpxgte. rhe‘dilplaccucnts nttcd
man»
chock
the
side.
of
hand.to
th1§.ner1gp
tn.
were
:ran.the
in
Rarely did the displscahehts cedar to the hack or thauldor.
tram
the
nthhdpoint
{hm
snalyuod
result;
\Ih1t1h1‘2r1hxs
uqrt
of initial and nuhluqnont
thee¢hnnd test with touch

trilla.

en

Ithhlltion

tn. initill trial

or the

Inhjcetn, taco
deninnnec uuu appurant 1h :11 use granny. 'lhrc_thnn half or such
and
none in thc
race
the
in
the
schnation
udulta
rcported
nonntl
hand. lhrno Cubdoetn ninlaehlisod tho lentation 1n the hand to
thn £160. In thn green: of hon-n1 children 90! under the use of
hand
the
percept
hiuloealizcd
thee
the
or
hereopt
:1: reported only
tha
{teeddhinhnoe
in
a:
also
1:
seen
face.
the
Ibis
pattern
to
children tram 7~12 years of age hat.th a 10:30: extent.
hand
the
adults‘reportod
or the ham-ll suhjaotl, five
indtidl
or
example
dinplaeenont
In
thn
an
trial.
only
Ittnulus
noted.
hand
was
tram race to
by
hand
extinction
or
by
daninanee
face
or
Ill pattern
the
more
apparent
was
tune
even
th
hind
percopt
of.the
dinplncclant
1n nornnl

�in thn patients aznninad. Xt uun.noat evident in patients with
arggnic gantal chanset, 935 or when did not repert bath stimuli
corrnctly. In callinntion. or uchixqphrunio lub:ectn and patinntu
with aphnail runponneu lililnr to thnse of thc annual adult were

observed on tum intill trial.
land doninnnoe was accllionllii seen in the patient and
vital: in tn. net-:1 Iahjpat. In «use. of hand dominance the
race'
not
the
reported
the
but
percent; It was seen
manual
I

in the initial trial

on

m
five different net-11 Malta

..

In

the”

instano§3. tun nubaoct ropnrtod both.ttanu11 carrectiy oh
nubaoauunt tinting. In the patidntt with organic mental changes
hand dauinnnee III In inconntant rtupanto and rcpeated touting the
sale day or on unbloquant dawn danonntrated thy amt! usual
poruiutunt pattern or
dominanco.

""

'

rm

1

stilulttion
,Rolponso on initini
roueh

19ml Adult
lam]. «mm,
low emu.

Totalicorrcot Pace

Only luaowraae land Only

160

77

15

3

5

3-6

564

m

23

18

a

7.12

76

33

27

9

2

7:

26

n5

1

2

syndrome 120

9

9n

n

3

o

o

Schisoyhranin

(“malt-niried)

mute luau:

trill

.

i

Apmu

Submgguont

I

23

Erialla or the

12

83

11

narnti adult.

uh» nude

errata

initial trial, #3 were correct on the uecond and 12 on the
third triul. In a to! sub: '“Vfﬂiaur. five at Ii: trill! var.

the

nucOIsary berare the tun stimuli Into corructly localised.

than.

on

�6.‘
ta be annual, althuugh complete psychologiaal
(tennion
during
that
noted
VII
anxiety
It
the
with
to'ploaae)
interfered
desire
strong
callinltton,er.n
annual
:11
aubaeetl,
In
rncognition
the
of
ntiauli.v
torruct
early
aubjoets ware Inlunnd
tent. wcro.not dune.

the
IIB
correct
once
those
rosponae
with
anxiety,
including
abtn1npd (oven

all

ﬁtter

an
was
iith
elicited
error.)
it
trials
number
warn
or
if
n¢cncd
a
an
tritll
It

many

aubnequont_teut1ns.:
”aét“
axmnlnntion,
the
at
the
into
neoenuary_ror tn. anbaect'ta set
evon
cccurutoly,
trtcr
the
ha
ntinnli
riported
the
once
in
tad
set,
of
any WI;
”9,10.an
in
that
was
apparent
child
annual
wanna
th:
it
In testing
inst canon Inn: tail: war. nocolsnry.h¢£ore the correct rotpanse
was «enlistently elicited. Alta, tan child at. not tlltya
dayu.
many
over
tasting
lopeutcd
tubaugunnt
touting.
an
correct
of
Ibis
tuna
daninlncc,
in:
shin
tbs
patterns
hauever, olicittd
natod in 36 of tho 56 childrtn tottqd, ‘In a number of instances
than
and
reportcd
tho
stimuli
appz1¢nttan
can
o;
Intchcd
en. child
was
thy
But
repeated
an
test
noon
corroetly.
percept1onn
tbs
t;
stimulus.
on.
repertod
child
tho
«my
with tm «you acted.
min
or
“int”
the
tn»
in:
not
into
could
tho
get
ehild
evident
that
It
oxtninntion, even with viaunl anal.
311
In
children.
in
not
wag
apparunt
vary
thin diffieulty
t6
the
76
give
the
failed
17
at
anly
(age:
7-12)
the older group
correct renponse utter th; inititl tau trials.
1.:
at the nae-hand
on
the reports obtained
repeated.
A:
relieved
connintent
s
pattern.
test: in mgr-:1 nubjecta also
tubsocti.
on tbs initial trial, face daninnncc was trivalent in all
or
or‘
obsmatien
(a)
extinction
by
It was: unite,” uthor
"

tr:

m

�8.
or
the
autumn
te
displacement
fees, or
er
me
atmii
”.in aevertl insteneea the displacement we. in a direction tantra
(1)) by

O3

'

em taco.
In contrast to normal adults, patient; with organic mental
change: were unuhie te regert the two stimuli earreetly even
utter many triele. When_the yetient reported the pereept in ane

teet eorreetly, he frequently failed on tubuequent testing; It
was tine Ipperent that touting en subsequent‘daye etiii elicited
in
and
er
stimuli.
extinction
dieeinemt
m: u ntrang
who
made
seldom
unmet:
to
tn error
apparently
subject:
centreet
on subsequent tritiu, day: after the initial examination. the
responses obteined in this group demanetrated the pattern: at tee.
teetfﬂ
deninnnee in meet or the
niepiaeenent of the hind percept
to the tune was frequent. In tame instances dieplneement or
extinctien was preeent deepite the {get that the putiont watched
the applitutiea of the etinnii to the fete and hand. Extinetien
was very taxman en hencieterni or heterologoun teeting while
~

ﬁne
apparent
dilpieoenent

neatly

on heterolegeun

teats.

514;
the
and
nyhneie patient:
the uehisephrenie
reports
gayb
which were «1:111: te normal adulte. After the first tie trial:

the pertentnge of errer in hand sensation was slightly higher
than in the normal greup. reraietent bistrre reepoaeee were
elicited from a number or the schizophrenic Inbdeetl. lheee
reperte ineluﬁed multiple responses to mingle or daubie stimuli,
pereietent displacement: to one area from any other body area,
ineonsittent
verve
end 'mimrreveruls or localiutien.
day:
As
normal
the
to
free
with
an
day
examinetien_and
eating
consecutive
an
the
aphasia
subject
Iehixephrenie
touting
or
idnlt,

M

�days roiled to elicit extinction phenonehe once the
been eccorltely reported before.

test

hen

‘

comparison of the reeponeee or each or theoe groove to
nultiple teeting in chain in fig. 1.
A

ﬁrﬁ
54’”

Pin Phick Btiuuietioh: It in known thet the type or
etinuiue epplied influence: the result: in perception. To
denonetrete the importance or thie rector einiier groups of
subject: were tested ueing two pin prick ineteed or two touch
etilnletione. With pin prick etinnieticn ct tece end hencﬂfece
dominance wee egein uehiteet in all the groupe. however, the
incidence of error in perception of the pin prick in the head
III lower than with e touch etinnloe. Ihe reeulte are recorded
in IhhﬂcIIt
Elna! II

:1

'

aﬁzaiiﬁfmﬁ’ﬁm
lttei
tor-ll

Adult

correct Pace only Feccqrece Hind an}:

68

51

15

2

c

ﬂannel child, 3~6 yearn #5
lorlml Child,7~12 your! 39
50
Schizophrenin

16

26

2

1

25

1h

0

0

36

13

9

1

arsenic lentei syndrome #7

9

33

3

2

Repeated testing with two pine in the nccnﬁi adult subject:
elicited the correct reeponeee in the initiel three trieie. Fever

at the chiloren ﬁgiﬁcd to report the teat eccuroteiy after the
initiel trials. ~It we: poeeibie ih_e hunter or instance: to
alternate touch and pin prick etieuietiohe, end demonstrate extinction
to touch, but correct localization to pin prick. loreover, with

�m.
abre intehae pih prick atianlatieh, extinction and diaplaeeaant
were lean frequently ebaerved.
vzheae phendaena, haaely extinction and diaplaeeaent were
eveh.nbre apparent in the patiehta with erzahie mental ayadreaea.
Bdaplaeeaeht or touch ltd-311 eauld be alternated with oerreet
Idealiaatibn of pin brick atzaulatiah. A ddubihatxon or touch tb
the fade had pin prick te the hand evinced the edubinetibn at
displacement and obaenratioh, an the patient reported “a teach
an the fade, and a dull the en the other aide {or the face).'
Pin prick to the eheak and teach to the hand raaulted 1n extinction
hand
the
pareept; be, oeeaaiehally, the rephrt or a pin prick
of
both an the cheek and hand.
rhe aehizephrenie aubaeete were able to loealiae the pin
prick accurately after the initial ten trials, an had the aerial

mule: .

Blﬂaﬂbazﬂl:
mains the nethbd er dabble ainnltaneoua

atinulatibn in
teuta or the face and the hand a eenaiateht pattern bf reapeneea
baa been observed in a variety hr aubaeota. the atinnlua to the
m.’ 1: non readily perbeived than the one 1:: the me. «never,
the pareept in the race influences the due in the hand,
frequently canning the displacement of aehaatibh. 1h1a pattern a:
reapbhaee haa been repeatedly deaehatrated in bath the annual and
abnormal eubJeeta, and 1a aahireet 1h extinetibn, obaeuratibn and
diablaeeaant. Extinction 1: abet and diaplaeeaeht :- leaet
frequent. In eatinetien, the race pereept 1a correetly reperted aa
te quality and leans, but the hand attanlua 1a not perceived at all;
In all hf the rereading teat: or patient or abrnaz aubJeeta§*uhether
By

�11;

'

tha reaponaaa were aaeurate tr not, it uaa notod that tbs
stiuuius
yointad
to the face
tirat.
aubjaet almost invariably
pattoived
and
1a
ourrectly
hand
perecpt
tha
Octaaianally
iooaliaed, but anamnea a qualitative differonce, always of
diaiﬁntion. In displaeunant tha percent in the hand 1: 113*
such
an
the
or
rage,
tho
it
direttitn
the
face, or
localiscd tn
to tan ahauldor er nuak. In aunt instance: if tha taco cud tho
hand at the lama aid: are stimulated, tho lubaeet occasionally
1a
thaae
phnnancna
of
1n
lane
the
taco.
raporta tut paroapta
ah:
or
these
un1eh
one
with
the
rrtquancy
haphaaard. nail.
varia«
druga,
be
attention,
observed
affected
by
may
erraeta 1:
tion in atilnli, ate., it: pattern 1: eonaiatent.
Thea. raaponaaa to tha face-hand teat arc undifiad by nan:
(b)
attenttan.
factor]
arc
ﬂame
influnnning
of
tbs
fa)
factora.
or
atinnlna,
(a)
type
of
stimuli,
(0)
simultanaity
d:
subject,
aga
(o) atrensth a: stilnlua, (t) locua of atilnlation and (3) internal
with
tha
fragment,
Etna;
alter
fatter! lax
atate or organiaa.
aﬁpeur
do
change
net
but
and
that
displaccnaut
which Ixtinetien
tbs pattern or face dalinanso.
1a
in
factor
of
tha
teat
a.na:or
Iuardnaaa
the aubaact'a
80th
attention
extinntiun.
a:
thy
phannncnon
of
tho appearance
’)(
awarenaai€£)1n.a
and priviona axpnrionoa tun bring stimuli to
two
to
were
informed
who
Itinnli
that
unra
adulta
atria: or twanty
Baoauaa
proviaua
of
applied
abouad
extinction
parcepta.
be
non.
tan
abet-nary
rcaerd
ta
uaa
intluensa.a response it
experience
in.ha1ve
ﬂatbed
aw
this
aubjccta.
tha.f1ndinga on initial trial
At
the
Ian»
wan
aintniacd.
experience
or
previoua
en. tactar
number
the
”alert"
for
he
the
on
tine tbs aubjcct was not apt to
'

�of stimuli he an: ta reeeive. cannequently ene night nay thet
the reason the subject perceived only one Itinulul or perceived
ene and diupleeed the
the
other
at
he
atinnluu
in
that
peﬁfypt
4
was not peying ettentlen. this aritieinn may be valid but the

Iiznifieant fact

it

9

//¢w

»

%

that the error III always aide in the hand
and net in_the‘teee. I: it were mere inattention one utula expect
50! or the single response: ta dauble einultaneeue stimulation
ta be in the hand end 50% in.the flee. But this type or ehance
enter was not ebterved. it the single reepenaes ta double
lilultaneeul Iti-nluticn 95% were at the fete percent and 5% at
the hand pereept. Iain pettern of race daninnnee or hand extinction
examinetionl.
further
during
subsequent
eitublilhed
Ill
lereovee,
when dinplneenent II. seen in normal aubJeetn, it was to the
race and not ta the hand.
ihin pattern at face daninnnee to deuble tinultnneaul
stimulation was fauna to be exnggereted in nan-.1 young children,
when
83$ deuanetrated either 33nd.extinetion or displeoenent
at
er the hand pereept to the face an the initial triel. loreover,
this high percentage of face duuinnet reiponnet peruisted on
eubuequent trielE. In the elder children ulna tece delineate
we: consistently demonstrable. It It: noted that the younger the
ahild, the more distinct In: thie puttern of race daninnnee.
awn extinetion night he Ittributed to an mummy to
perceive two ltﬂluli at once. Ehiu particulir detect has been
noted in patient: with severe until change? (“Zlf'ﬁﬁevm in
patient: with severe lentel changed or in young children itinuli
epplied to both cheek: or both hands or.eny other two hanglegonn
body even: were correctly reported as tee uenentione. Ihere it:
_

�neither extinetion nor displacement. aaldstein'eKohuervatien,
therafere, cannot be used an an explnnetion for hand extinetion.
what
matter
daninanne
in
noted
apparent
flee
that
at
It is
types or etimnlltion was used. Simulteheoun pin prick stimulation:
revealed the pattern of face daninenee, elthaugh with e leaner
frequency than touch etinhiltiona. ether duteneeua utinuletion
such :1 two tuning forks, hot and cold telperature tuhel, rtpetitive
rubbing and repetitive pin prick Itianletian were Ipplied and
neniteet
regardless of the cuteneeun utilnletiun
race daninence is
ﬂied.

inphrtmee of the ainulteneity or the ”man. has nlrudy
been alluded to. In eubJeetn in when extinctidn In: persistent,
consecutive epplieetion or the stimuli invariably resulted in
the permeption or two stimuli. In actual Idultn consecutive
the
nun-L1
the
on
the
even
of
two
trial,
we
ma.
etiluletion
extihetioa.
never resulted in
-euuni
thin
thy
nerd
ntinuli
intensity.
at
these
ethdien
In
aux-aux,
the
for
in
inn-pom:
the
in
pattern
mum
eliciting
”I.
stimuli here teemingly mare readily perceived than equal etiuuli.
After the first few trials the etheet was able to perdeive the
two stimuli, even it one we: pnintul and the other not. In
and
diaextinction
mental
hhuevee,
with
chnhses,
organic
patient:
quality,
the
wide
dinorepency in
pleeenent were manifest despite a
of the stimuli. aw Altering the etrength a! the Itinhli, it ran
hand
the
at
the
tram
extinction
response
pdlaihle to alternate
th
teak)
the'
ta
diepleaenent
were
hand
the
stieuli
percept (if
.gheek (if the head stimuli were utrang). The sneeze than extinhtien
ulst
the
the
at
by
quality
elidited
altering
run
displacement
to
The

'

‘

�13.

touch
the
to
,Ievertheleac,
frna
prick.
pin
that
ia
atiunli,
a
at.
a,ua
oe'aaa
the part: of the body being aianltanecnaly atianlated are
have
patterna.
theae
I!
etudying
consideration
in
another
already alluded to the fact that extinction ie anat cannon in
the hand and leaat in the face. In teating other body areaa the
incidence of extinction and diaplaceaent ia leaa than in teating
and
ahcnlder
thigh nay
hand.
and
the
testing
the face
Ithat is,
not elicit extinction or cbacnraticn,where the faceehand teat will.
Alec, in patients with leaicnn or the brain or apinal cord,
the pattern or relationahip cf the body parts tc aiaultaneoua
atinnlaticn.nay be altered in a characteriatic haniaenaery or
”level leaicn' ayndreae. Aa fer the aignificance cf the pattern
be
can
the
leaning
before
prayer
further atndiea are neceaaary
would
be
time
purely
thin
deducticn.aade
Any
at
interpreted.
that
by
gained
atating
ia
nothing
For
inatance,
speculative.
dcainance
(7).
of
inpliea
order
aenccry
rcatral
a
daninance
face
Such hypetheaia ia ccntradicted by at leaat one tact, naaely the
‘chaervaticn that when the hand and fact are atimlated eimltanecualy
data
are
hand.
after'ncre
Perhapa
the
dcninatea
over
the fact
accumulated a aatiafactcry theory night he obtained.
,

QUIIIRI:
hand
haa
and
race
the
cf
teata
in
pattern in perception
method
cf
the
abnaraal
and
anh:ecta.hy
been elicited in actual
dcnble simultaneous atianlaticn of cutanacua uhdalitiea.
hand
the
of
percent
extinction
by
Face delinance, aaniteat
an
a
in
seen
the
hand
to
race,
the
or
percent
or dicplaceaent
the~
and
in
non-a1
the
adulte,
in
naniteatcd
normal phancaencn,
aeriea.
the
exasined
in
and
anhaaie
cchiacphrenia
with
patienta
A

�15.
with
in
m
in
menu:It 1: mcntod young «mum
and
what
,of
ditpnouont
the
«unﬁt.»
bran
in
an...”

mitten:

utter

may}. mun .

.

um.
m

1:
at
run
or
unite“
denim”
usual.”
pattern
m:
1n
the
a
only
clung.
{chucking
the autumn- nodanw team,
a!
11th
in
type
“mum.
.cxtincuoa'
at
rmugnay

am.

‘

�m,
mm W
:m.
In,”
Wtiﬂl
m
t
‘4;
“1,5151
m
m m
«some.
mm
m.“
1.!”
Id.
“.3.
mo
mm.
m, 19”.Mum-sic
3.:
(I)
cum...
mm
m
mm.
m,
at unusual
than.
”pm
ma.
a;
M
ammo
3.1.:
Aug-mu
m
m
'
Mm
m
mummy
Mmkwém Datum
81mm!“
11W.
m.
mnnmuumumumwmm
mum.
£1.
Pittm‘03.;
I.
w
m
mum
m;
m.
u-mmmuormmomm
-.-.m:

1. (I)

W
3.3.
1‘

“

‘3)

2. (a)

3.

I

‘

if...

.5

. --...

08

,

and

-

....,

610:

«.5

an

.LL.

-.

&gt;

,

'

and

813-191,

5

.

1

am.

1.1.

11.3.;and

in

11.:

@1162!!!

5.

mwﬂw

W

mm.
mmm

In ﬁt an

6.
.

W

Warm.
to mom

chum-

as

«W

1M6 61m
72: 5

nth

m to frontal am “so.
«poets of m may

W
Auwmmmm
5mm

mm
manna-mm.

cm,

R. and

m

max.
mam...
at

1956.

tn

“1.

1959.

and

501.515.

,5

-.

‘0

117.121.,
_

‘

8.3.

ILL!

(o)

50

phonon-manor

1n

5......-

1'.

9:
3.1.:
9:135:19:
wholes“
1
”“33;
of
pm1p1uuea
m

and
11014:

11.8.:

(h)

m1
mm
mum.

an

6.1.: w

by 191111101111
166-1685 19195

tuna-Mon.

�PATTERNS IN PERCEPTION

By:
‘I
0—m—

ON

SIMULTANEOUS TESTS OF FACE AND HAND

Morris B. Bender, M.D., Max Fink, M.D., and Martin Green,
In previous studies we found that the method of double

M.D.

simultaneous stimulation showed defects in sensation (extinction)
testing
In
which
routine
were not apparent on
single stimulation.
;
the
two
of
body and various combinations it was
different
regions
\,
found that extinction was apt to occur most often in the hand and
least in the face. Conversely, "dominance" was greatest in the face and
least in the hand. In the present commuhication we wish to report
simultaneous
on
obtained
the results
stimulation of the face and the
hand (the face-hand test) in groups of subjects with the following
conditions: 1) aphasia without hemiparesis or hemisensory syndrome;
2) aphasia with severe mental changes; 3) organic mental syndrome;

disease
5)
of the
no
4) schizophrenia;

,‘

brain (normal adults) and 6)
four
of
between
normal children
the ages
to ten years. 'Patients in
5
2
showed
and
severe memory defects, confusion, poor orientation,
groups
difficulties in calculation and other symptoms characteristic of
diffuse disease of the brain.
Method: The subject was instructed to close his eyes. When
this was done his face (cheek) and contralateral hand (any part of
the hand or fingers) were touched simultaneously. Care was taken to
make two stimulations of equal intensity. As soon as the stimuli
were applied the subject was asked tox°eport what he felt, and following
this, Where he felt the sensation. Identical tests were carried out
with light rubbing and pin prick stimulations.
Results: Under these conditions the subject gave either of the
following responses on the first-examination: a) a touch on the face
only (face dominance), implying no sensation in the hand (extinction);
.

$1.1mMuTﬁzA

kﬁWJqM 5.4.1:.

�2.

b) a touch on both sides of the face (there being "displacement"
from the hand to the ipsilateral face); 0r 0) a touch on the face
and contralateral hand. In the (a) response the subject was asked

whether he felt still another stimulus. The reply was either in
the negative, or there was uncertainty or vague approximation.
This question suggested to the subject that there were two

stimulations so that
than one stimulus.

on

subsequent tests he was expectant of more

In the (b) type of response the subject mislocalized or
displaced the sensation evoked in the hand toward the ipsilateral
face. Since the mislobalization was towards the face it appeared
as if the face determined the direction of the displacement. It

might be said, therefore, that this was a type of face dominance.
Response (b), or diaplacement, was less common than response (a)
or extinction. Response (b) was seen most often in the patients

with the organic mental syndrome, and persisted despite repeated
testing. The (c) responSe was the expected normal and needs no

special comment.
Extinction

and displacement were

also noted

the ipsilateral face and hand were simultaneously tested. In all the
subjects tested, including those with aphasia, there was no
difference between the right and left sides of the body.
Analysis of the results obtained in the various groups is
shown in the following table:
when

�3.
Group

of
Subjects

Number

1

15

2

12

3

Face Response

Extinction or

Face and Hand‘ Hand Response
Response

~

Displacement
9

6

O

12

O

O

22

20

2

O

4

20

14

6

O

5

55

24

28

6

20

l
l

From

-

p

.

19

o

it

is obvious that whenever there is
sensation over another it is apparent in the face.

the foregoing

dominance of one

p

Dominance in the hand was noted only once.

dominance
Face
was found

almOSt uniformly in the

subjects with.severe mental changes (groups
2 and 5.) These patients did not report sensation in the hand even
after repeated testing. In a few instances, even after the patients
were told there were two stimuli, or were asked towratch the application of the stimuli, they reported only one percept or displaced one.
In these cases simultaneous stimulation of both sides of the face
was reported correctly, thus excluding the objection that these
patients were not able to&lt;io or perceive two things at once.
The incidence of face dominance in subjects with aphasia and
those
in
with schizophrenia (groups 1 and 4) was less. In contrast
to patients in groups 2 and 5, those in groups 1 and 4 reported both
sensations correctly on the second, third or fourth trials, if they
had not done so on the first trial.‘ In the group of normal adults
(group 5) the incidence of face dominance was least, but still
'

significant,
a

even though

it

was found only on the

first trial.

series of normal children the incidence of face dominance

was

In

�In young children face
dominance was present even several trials after the first examina-

almost the same as in groups

2 and

5.

tion.
the face and parts of the body other than the hand
were tested simultaneously in groups 2 and 3, face dominance was‘
The
order of dominance was face, shoulder, grunk
apparent.
still
When

(breast), penis, thigh, calf, foot, arm and hand.
In
Conclusion:
a wide variety of subjects the phenomena of
extinction and displacement on double simultaneous stimulation were
demonstrated. A consistent pattern of perception was established
in which the face was most dominant and the hand the least. These
findings were noted in both the abnormal and the normal subjects.
-In the abnormal subjects withseVere mental changes, face dominance
and hand extinction were so consistent that they may be used as a
sign of diffuse disease of the brain, but only when found to persist
after repeated examinations.
The pattern of dominance, as well as the phenomenon of
extinction, which are so prominent in patients with diffuse brain
disease, appear to be exaggerations of the pattern found in the
normal subjects, especially children.
I

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2254">
                <text>Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1950;51:250-2. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2255">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2256">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-2a-003</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2257">
                <text>1950</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2258">
                <text>Bender, Morris B.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2259">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2260">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2261">
                <text>[Two preprints] and a reprint. Reprint from Transactions of the American Neurol Assoc. 1950;51:250-2. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2262">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2263">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74428">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80989">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87550">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94111">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="234" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="25">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e80dbde06dd20201f1e94a10beff3999.pdf</src>
        <authentication>14b484b6bedc00163228f7cd6f29a33a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100651">
                    <text>Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
August 1954, Vol. 72, pp. 233-255
Copyright, 1954, by American Medical Association

PATTERNS OF PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION WITH
SIMULTANEOUS STIMULI
MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.

MARTIN A. GREEN, M.D.
AND

MAX FINK, M.D.
NEW YORK

TUDIES of function of the nervous system by any one method will show

patterns. This is a general law which applies to motor, perceptual, and psychic
functions. Patterns of functions are present in the normal as well as in the abnormal state. For example, normal subjects show variations in the ability to discriminate two closely applied points in different regions of the body. Thus, the pattern
for two—point discrimination is one in which the ﬁnest differentiation is at the
tongue or ﬁnger tips, while other parts of the body, such as the back or the thigh,
require a greater distance between two points before discrimination of “twoness”
2
be
made.1
Pearson
the pattern for the normal sense of vibration
to
According
can
is one in which the threshold is low at the clavicle and high over the sacrum. In
vision discrimination of targets under daylight illumination is best in the central,
and poorest in the peripheral, portion of the perimetric ﬁeld. And so it is with all
other modalities. Each sensation has a pattern in space as well as in time. Each
of these patterns is obtained by adopting procedures in which a single stimulus
ﬁgure is used in testing the subject.
In measuring sensation, we know that there are many factors which inﬂuence
the perceptual response. Intensity and duration of stimulus, the stimulus ﬁgure,
the locus in the sensory ﬁeld, the attention and intellectual capacity of the subject
are but a few of the determinants. Recently we have stressed symmetry as having
a bearing on perception.3 Still another factor is age.4 For instance, there are some
perceptual examinations which could not be carried out in children because the
ability to respond to these tests depends partly on the ability to concentrate on a
particular problem and to cooperate over a matter of many minutes. These are two
properties which most very young children do not possess. Moreover, we have
found that reactions in the old are not the same as those in the younger subjects.
Another condition which inﬂuences the perceptual response is the number of
stimuli employed at one time. Two stimuli when applied simultaneously may yield
responses which are different from those to stimuli applied in succession. Simultaneous touch of the face and hand may be perceived only on the face, whereas
when each of these parts is successively touched with an interval of one or more
Post—Doctorate Fellow, United States Public Health Service (Dr. Green).
Paper read at the Fifth International Neurological Congress, Lisbon, Sept. 7—12, 1953.
This work was aided, in part, by a fellowship grant from the National Foundation for
Infantile Paralysis and the Neurologic Research Fund of the Mount Sinai Hospital.
From the Department of Neurology of the Mount Sinai Hospital, and the Department of
Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College of Medicine.

�2

seconds, the same subject perceives each stimulus. The simultaneous application
of more than two stimuli may yield other types of perceptual reactions. Cohn5
applied three stimuli all at once and obtained results which were different from
those elicited with conventional single stimuli in the same areas. In 1893 Krohn 6
investigated the effects of simultaneous touch stimulation of multiple (seven)
regions of the skin in normal subjects. Parts of the trunk, extremities, forehead,
and, at times, the chin were touched simultaneously by tambours. With these tests
the subjects made errors in localization of the applied stimuli. However, no distinct
pattern was sought. In analyzing Krohn’s material, we found a suggestion of a
pattern in that there were less errors over the back than over the front. This study
was interesting but not very illuminating.
The technique of double simultaneous stimulation had been known since the
7
of
1882
time
Hippocrates. In
Oppenheim mentioned the method in his textbook.
Since this description there had been few intensive studies of the method until
1943, when one of us began a series of investigations. During the past decade we
have examined several thousands of subjects with this technique. As we gathered
our data, it was noted that in tests involving asymmetrically placed stimuli certain
regions of the body yielded correct .responses, while others yielded consistently
incorrect responses. On numerous simultaneous stimulations of the face and hand
a distinct pattern of response has been observed in which errors in identifying and
localizing the stimuli on the hand became apparent. Conversely, there were very
few errors in perception of the stimuli on the face. In this test situation the face
was “dominant” to the hand. Face dominance has been found in normal adults,
but it is particularly evident in patients with disease of the brain, in very aged
persons, and in normal children, 3 to 6 years of age. This pattern of response,
namely, face dominance, has been found so consistently that it prompted us to
study body combinations other than that of the face and hand. The object of this
investigation was to determine the order of dominance when various combinations
of two parts of the body were tested in this manner. A preliminary note on this
study was reported at the 76th Annual Meeting of the American Neurological
Association, in June, 1951.8
METHOD AND SUBJECT MATERIAL

The method of testing was the same as that described for the face-hand test in previous
communications.9 The subject was requested to close his eyes, and two parts of the body were
simultaneously touched or stroked. He was asked what he felt and to localize the stimuli. If
only one stimulus was reported, the subject was then asked if another was felt.
The subjects used in these studies consisted of patients and normal adults and children.
Series I: Patients who showed mental changes or an organic mental syndrome* as a result
of disease of the brain, such as arteriosclerotic encephalopathy, senile psychosis, severe cerebral
trauma, Alzheimer’s disease, toxic encephalopathy, or brain tumor. In general, patients with
severe mental changes who made many errors on simultaneous stimulation tests were chosen
for a special study group. Patients with aphasia, hemiparesis, or a hemisensory defect were
included in another group. Series II: Normal children and adults. The normal children were
taken from a day—care center and an orphanage. The normal adults were patients on the wards
of the general hospital, those attending hospital clinics, and Army inductees. None of the normal

The mental changes which make up the organic mental syndrome consist of a combination
of at least three or more of the following manifestations: impairment in orientation, memory,
calculation, or general information; rigidity and concreteness in mental performance, and marked
ﬂuctuations and inability to perform when there is more than one aspect to a situation.
*

�3

children or normal adults had manifest disease of the nervous system. They had not been
previously examined by the method of double simultaneous stimulation. We also examined a
group of older people. These were presumably normal, although cerebral arteriosclerosis could
not be entirely excluded in people between the ages of 65 and 90 years. Series III: Patients
with schizophrenia or manic depressive conditions. These patients were adults in the wards
of the Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital and Manhattan State Hospital. No attempt was made to
study the speciﬁc types of schizophrenia. Most of them were of the paranoid, mixed, or simple
schizophrenic varieties.
Inasmuch as previous investigations have shown that patients with severe mental changes
due to disease of the brain and normal young children made frequent errors in tests of simultaneous stimulation, it was natural that we should make the most extensive studies on these
two groups.10 Also, since normal adults make few errors after the ﬁrst two to three trials on
double simultaneous stimulation, it was not possible to detect a pattern in these subjects.
From these three series of cases we studied several groups in detail. Group A, which was
studied in the greatest detail, consisted of 20 patients with organic mental syndrome (10 males
and 10 females). These subjects were tested with the method of double simultaneous stimulation
of different parts of the body and in multiple combinations. The following parts of the body
were examined: face, shoulder, hand, back, breast, penis, pubic region in females, buttock,
thigh, and foot. Patients were tested while they were completely nude and, for the most part,
while they were standing. The speciﬁc areas stimulated for certain parts of the body were as
follows: the dorsum of the hand; the dorsum of the foot; the anterior aspect of the thigh;
just below the scapula on the back; close to the midline on the buttock; the nipple and areolar
area of the breast; the lower quadrant of the abdomen; the tip of the penis or the mons veneris.
Of these body parts there were 45 possible double combinations. It should be noted that the
combinations were of regions distributed along the longitudinal axis of the body. Each patient
was tested in all 45 combinations in. a random but similar order. Twelve tests were done for
each combination. These consisted of ﬁve tests of the two body parts in a homolateral relation,
ﬁve tests of the two body parts in a heterologous relation, and two tests in a homologous
relation, one for each of the body parts. There were 240 tests in every combination for the
total group. Each patient received 540 tests.
The other group, Group B, which we studied in great detail, using thousands of trial tests,
consisted of 40 normal children between 3 and 6 years of age. In 20 of these children (12 boys
and 8 girls), all body combinations of two were tested except those involving the genital zone.
In the other 20 children (12 boys and 8 girls), the genital region combinations were tested as
well as some of the other body combinations. The testing was carried out in the same manner
as described for patients with disease of the brain except that only half as many tests in each
combination were done. The genital zone was usually touched directly, with the child partially
nude. The remaining unexposed body parts were usually tested through the clothing.
To supplement these studies, we also examined a group of 692 normal adults, 605 schizophrenic adults, and 664 patients with organic mental syndrome. However, these subjects were
not tested as intensively as those of the above two groups. Different body combinations were
tested in different subjects. Only one of the following body combinations was tested in any
one subject for 10 trials or more; face—hand, face-breast, face—penis, face-back, face-foot, face—
shoulder, shoulder—hand, breast—hand, penis—hand, thigh-hand, foot-hand, thigh-foot, breast-foot,
breast-thigh, buttock—foot, penis-foot, shoulder—foot, and shoulder-breast. The two parts of the
body were ﬁrst touched in two heterologous relations and then in the two homolateral relations.
Particular attention was directed to the ﬁrst response. If an error was made in any one test,
that particular test was repeated until the patient was correct, or for at least ﬁve times if the
error persisted. At least 10 trials were done on each patient. Stimulation of the unexposed
parts of the body, except for the penis, was done through clothing. The penis was touched
directly.
The pattern of dominance has also been studied incidental to other investigations on perception in groups such as Group C, comprised of patients with focal brain disease manifested by
hemiplegia or aphasia 11; Group D, patients with long—standing or congenital blindness; Group E,
patients who had congenital or long—standing deafness; Group F, normal adults recovering from general anesthesia or while under the effect of intravenous amobarbital (Amytal)
sodium 12; Group G, psychiatric patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy; Group H, mentally

�4
defective adults,13 and Group I, very aged or senile adults.4 It must be emphasized, however,
that we did not test all the possible combinations of body parts in every one of these groups
except in Groups A and B. The emphasis was mainly on determining the relationship of the
face and the hand to the rest of the body areas. The results obtained in these incidental studies
showed that the pattern of dominance was similar to the one obtained in this study of patients
with severe mental changes due to disease of the brain.
RESULTS

The responses on double simultaneous testing of any two parts of the body
fell into several groups. Using the face—hand combination as an example, the subject may report the following responses, as recorded in Table 1.
Responses in which there was extinction or displacement“? of the stimulus over
one area in any combination were tabulated as a single type of response. For
example, in the face-hand combination responses in which the face stimulus was
correctly perceived but in which extinction or displacement of the hand stimulus
TABLE

1.—Pattem of Responses to Double Simultaneous Farce-Hand Tests

Combination of

Body Parts
Simultaneous touch
of face and hand

‘

Possible Response
(a) Face-hand

Classiﬁcation
Correct

(b) Face only

Extinction

Face

Extinction

Hand

Displacement

Face

(c)

Hand only

(d) Face-face

Dominance
None

(e)

Hand-hand

Displacement

Hand

(f)

Face-other part
of body

Displacement

Face

(9) Hand-other

part

Displacement

Hand

(h) Face-and a
in space

part

Exosomesthesia

Face

Exosomesthesia

Hand

of body

(i)

Hand-and a part
in space

occurred were tabulated together under “face” responses. Each of the responses
indicates dominance of the face over the hand. Hence, the reason for grouping
them under “face dominance.” Face dominance responses were much more fre—
quent than any of the hand dominance responses.
The responses for all the body combinations were tabulated in a similar manner. For the patients with organic mental syndrome and for the normal children
tested in all body combinations, the “dominant” responses for one part of the body
as compared with those of the other part of the body in each combination were
analyzed by the t test. The initial responses of the normal and schizophrenic adults
and of the other patients with organic brain disease tested in a single combination
were analyzed by the method of chi-square. There were a small number of responses
The failure of the subject to report one of two simultaneously applied stimuli has been
called “the phenomenon of sensory extinction,” or “extinction.” The part of the body where
the stimulus is perceived is said to be “dominant” to the part of the body where the simultaneous
stimulus is not perceived. When the subject reports two sensations but mislocalizes one of
them, the “displacement” of a percept is said to have occurred. Displacements are usually in the
direction of the dominant stimulus and may be partial or complete. Occasionally, one or both
stimuli are displaced into the extrapersonal space. This has been termed “exosomesthesia.”14
1'

�5
TABLE 2.—Res[&gt;onses of

Twenty Patients with Organic Mental Syndrome to Simultaneous Tests
of Different Body Combinations
Dominant

Dominant

Responses

Other
Total
Errors* Face Part

Face Combinations
Face-genitals ..................
FACE-abdomen i ..............
FACE-buttock .................
FACE-breast ..................
FACE-foot ....................
FACE-back ....................
FACE-shoulder ................
FACE-thigh ...................
FACE-hand ....................

68
109
79
122
89
105
154

37
78
60
104
66
95
127
85
145

104
149

31
31
19
18
23
10
27
19
4

Responses

Genitals Combinations
Genitals-face ...................
GENITALS-abdomen ..........
GENITALS-buttock ...........
GENITALS-breast .............
GENITALS-foot ...............
GEN ITALS-back ..............
GENITALS-shoulder ..........
GEN ITALS-thigh ..............
GEN ITALS-hand ..............

Total
Errors

Geni- Other

68
121

78
106
138
98
90
124
143

Dominant

Hand Combinations
Hand-FACE ..................
Hand-GENITALS ............

Total
Errors

Hand-ABDOMEN .............
Hand-BUTTOCK .............

Hand-BREAST ...............
Hand-FOOT ...................
Hand-BACK ..................
Hand-SHOULDER ...........
Hand-THIGH ................

149
143
152
132
163
136
97
127
142

____/Lﬁ
Other

Hand

Part

4

145
132
131
109
134
117
69
107
114

11
21

23
29
19
28
20
28

H%

Buttock Combinations
Buttock-FACE ................
Buttock-GENITALS ...........
Buttock-abdomen .............
Buttock-breast ................

..................
BUTTOCK—back ...............
BUTTOCK-shoulder ...........
Buttock-thigh .................
BUTTOCK-hand

Buttock—foot

...............

79
78
99
94
118
104
93
105
132

Other

19
12
38
55
43
79
65
45
109

60
66
61
39

Part

75

25
28
60
23

Abdomen Combinations
Abdomen-FACE ...............
Abdomen-GENITALS .........
Abdomen-buttock .............
Abdomen-breast ...............
Abdomen-foot .................
Abdomen-back .................
Abdomen-shoulder .............
Abdomen-thigh ................
ABDOMEN—hand

..............

109
121
99
111
104
97
90
115
152

r

Foot-FACE ....................
Foot-GENITALS ..............
Foot-abdomen .................
Foot-buttock ..................
Foot-breast ....................
Foot-back .....................
Foot-shoulder .................
Foot-thigh .....................
FOOT-hand ....................

89
138
104
118
100
105
96
125
136

23
23
58
75
41
49
51
77
117

66
115
46
43
59
56
45
48
19

Breast Combinations
Breast-FACE ..................
Breast-GENITALS ............
Breast-abdomen ...............
Breast-buttock ................
Breast-foot ....................
BREASToback .................

Breast-shoulder ................
Breast-thigh ...................
BREAST-hand .................

122
106
111
94
100
77
121
85
163

Shoulder Combinations
Shoulder-FACE ................
Shoulder-GENITALS ..........
Shoulder-abdomen .............
Shoulder-BUTTOCK ...........
Shoulder-breast ................
Shoulder-foot..................
Shoulder-back .................
Shoulder-thigh .................
SHOULDER-hand .............

154
90
90
93
121
96
131
93
127

der

Part

27
20
32
28
69
45
53
58
107

127
70
58
65
52
51
78
35
20

Responses
'

'

_ﬁ

18
22
56
39
59
55
52
48
134

104
84
55
55
41
22
69
37
29

Responses

Back Combinations
BaCk-FACE ....................
Back-GENITALS ..............
Back-abdomen .................
Back-BUTTOCK...............
Back-BREAST .................

Back-foot ......................
Back-shoulder .................
BACK-thigh ...................
BACK-hand ....................

Total
Errors
105
98
97
104
77
105
131
127
97

r—A—ﬁ
Other
Back

Part

10
15
53
25
22
56
78
86
69

95
83
44
79
55
49
53
41
28

Dominant

Responses

Responses

Total
Errors

21

Dominant

Dominant

f—A—‘l
Shoul- Other

131

Total
Other
Errors Breast Part

Responses

Foot Combinations

29
61
55
46
44
58
76

78
92
38
56
58
53
32
39

31

Dominant

Dominant
r———A‘—ﬁ
Other
Total
Errors Foot Part

37
29
12
22
23
15
20
30
11

,__JL_____
Total Ade- Other
Errors men Part

Responses

Buttock

31
92
66
84
115
83
70
94
132

Responses

Dominant

Total
Errors

Part

Dominant

Responses

'—

tals

Thigh Combinations
Thigh-FACE ...................
Thigh-GENITALS .............
Thigh-abdomen ................
Thigh-buttock .................
Thigh-breast ...................
Thigh-foot .....................
Thigh-BACK ...................

Thigh-shoulder ................
THIGH-hand ..................

Total
Errors
104
124
115
105
85
125
127
93
142

r-_A_—ﬁ
Other
Thigh Part
19
30
39
60
37
48
41
35
114

85
94
76
45
48
77
86
58
28

Two hundred tests done in each combination were analyzed statistically. The remaining 40 tests in each
combination were of homologous body parts and did not lend themselves to this type of analysis.
i Capital letters indicate dominant part as evidenced by a t test value of 5% or less.
*

‘

�6

which were difﬁcult to interpret, and there were a few that showed characteristic
perseveration in behavior. These responses were not included in the statistical
analysis.
Extinction and displacement occurred in all of the body combinations tested
in all groups. The incidence of these phenomena varied with the method of testing.
On testing body parts in a heterologous but bilateral relation, extinction and displacement occurred with approximately equal frequency. With tests involving
ipsilateral body parts, the majority of errors consisted of extinction.
1. Patients with Organic Mental Syndrome—In Group A 20 patients were
tested in all the combinations of the body; there were 27 combinations in which
the difference in the frequency of extinction and that of displacement in the two
body parts tested was statistically signiﬁcant, as evidenced by a t test value of
5% or less (Table 2). This difference occurred in combinations of the face and
TABLE

3.—Response on the Initial Trial in Patients with. Organic Mental Syndrome Tested
in a Single Body Combination
Responses Indicating
Dominance of
Body Part

Combination of
Body Part

,——-——A———ﬁ
B
A
FACE *
FACE
FACE
FACE
FACE
SHOULDER
BREAST
PENIS
FOOT

THIGH

FOOT
BUTTOCK
PENIS
Shoulder
Shoulder
*

Hand
Breast

Penis
Back

Foot

Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand
Thigh

Foot
Foot
Foot

Breast

N o. of

r—A

gﬁ

Other
Responses
..

Subjects

Correct

156

15
17

136
44

8
7

21

1

0

17
21
17
37
23

2

4

O

0

1

2

5

2

2

0
2
0

71

30
30
30

9

32
51

12
7

31

6
10

49
23
60
35
40
23
13

8

19
5
8
1

3

B
5

6

30

7

15
25
21

O

30
12
5

Capital letters indicate dominant part as evidenced by a chi-square value of

4

12
8

4

1

1

9

1

5

0

5%

1

or less.

other parts, the genital region (penis in males and pubic region in females) and
other parts, or the hand and other parts. In combinations involving the face
or the genital region, errors in perception were infrequent. Therefore the face
and the genital region may be termed as dominant to all other parts of the body.
In combinations involving the hand, the opposite phenomenon occurred; errors
in perception were more frequent in the hand. The hand may be classified as the
least dominant area of the body. Thus, in face-hand tests the results may be
expressed either as degree of face dominance or that of hand errors. There were
four additional combinations in which dominance was manifested. The buttock was
dominant to the back and shoulder, the breast was dominant to the back, and the
back was dominant to the thigh. The remaining 18 combinations showed no domi—
nance between the two body parts tested, as evidenced by t values greater than 5%
(Table 2). These 18 combinations were retested in a different group of 20 patients.
The method was similar to that described previously except that the order of
testing was more randomized. When the statistical probabilities of the two series
of tests were combined, all of these combinations again failed to manifest dominance.

�7

An analysis of the responses of the group of 664 patients with organic mental
syndrome tested in single rather than multiple body combinations showed a similar
pattern (Table 3). There were no instances in which dominance in this group was
different from that of the preceeding group. However, some combinations manifested
dominance which was not shown in the ﬁrst group. Thus, the face was dominant
to the genital region; the foot was dominant to the thigh, and the buttock was
dominant to the foot.
In summary, the foregoing results show that double simultaneous stimulation
tests of parts of the body exhibit a deﬁnite relationship of one part to another.
This is manifested by varying degrees of dominance, which may be considered as
a gradient of sensation. At the top of the gradient is the face, the most dominant
part of the body. The genital region is slightly less dominant than the face but is
dominant over all other parts of the body and is thereby the next body area in the
order of dominance. At the other end of the gradient is the hand, the least dominant
part of the body. The remaining areas of the body fall in the gradient between the
‘

loo—
I’ACE

PERCENTAGE

0r
ooutNAN'r
RESPONSES

GENITAL
R [6| 0 N
ABDOMEN
BUTTOCK
BREAST

6°
5°

FOOT
BACK

SHOULDER

TH IGH

4°

HAND

30
20
no

0
BODY PART

FIG. I. ORDER OF DOMINANCE IN PATIENTS WITH ORGANIC BRAIN DISEASE

face and genital region and the hand. These parts include the shoulder, foot. thigh,
and the areas on the trunk. W'hen tested in combination with each other, these
body parts failed, for the most part, to yield differences in dominance among one
another. There was a tendency, however, for the buttock, abdomen, breast, and
foot to be dominant to the back, shoulder, and thigh. The order of dominance of
all body areas may be illustrated by comparing the total number of dominant
responses for each area in the group of 20 patients tested in multiple combinations

(Fig.

l).

N ownal C lzildrew—It has been shown that normal children make errors in
simultaneous cutaneous sensory tests just as do patients with an organic mental
Syndrome. There was one striking difference, however, between the two groups.
2.

Children tended to learn the correct response as the tests were repeated over a
period of days, whereas patients with an organic mental syndrome showed but
temporary learning tendencies. They soon forgot what they learned and again
made the errors.
When various combinations of two parts of the body were tested in the young
children, an order of dominance became apparent, just as in the patients with an

�8

organic mental syndrome. The order of dominance in normal children resembled,
to a considerable extent, that found in patients with diffuse brain disease. The face
was the most dominant and the hand the least dominant area (Fig. 2). The genital
region was not so dominant as in patients with organic disease of the brain, since
it failed to show dominance to the shoulder, back, and breast, although it was
dominant to all other areas. In tests involving the genital region many children
snickered, laughed, or showed other signs of special awareness of the sexual organs.
Some refused to be touched there and became uncooperative. Because of this atti—
tude, it was necessary to obtain the parents’ permission for the test.
The order of dominance for the rest of the body areas in these children also
showed little difference from that noted in patients with disease of the brain
(Table 4). In only one of these combinations was dominance different from that
demonstrated in patients with an organic mental syndrome. In children the foot
was dominant to the buttock. The same combination tested in the group of patients
with an organic mental syndrome showed the buttock dominant to the foot.
IOO

so

PERCENTAGE

0‘
DOMINANT

RESPONSES

°°
,0

FACE

GENITAL
REGION
SHOULDER

roor

co

aurrocx BREAST

so

BACK

THIGH

4°

ABDOMEN

HAND

30
20
l0

0
BODY PART

FIG.

2. ORDER OF DOMINANCE

IN NORMAL CHILDREN

3-6

YEARS OF AGE

Normal Adults.—Several groups of normal adults were studied. In previous
communications the responses of simultaneous touching of the face and hand were
reported. The results showed a high face dominance. Examination of other body
combinations showed a tendency to similar pattern, as recorded in the foregoing
paragraphs (Table 5). However, the data obtained in combinations other than the
face-hand were not very reliable, because the number of experiments were too few
in number. It should be noted that the normal adult very readily grasps the idea
of “twoness,” or the concept that two stimuli are being used. Consequently, his
chances of yielding a single response on repeated tests are small, especially if he
once correctly reports the perception of the stimuli. Thus, it would be most difﬁcult
for us to get a large number of statistically significant data for other body areas.
In order to obtain reliable data it would be necessary to test a very large
number of normal adults by statistical methods. For the time being, most of our
emphasis was placed on testing patients with organic brain disease, young children,
and very old adults. Judging from our data, it may be presumed that the complete
order of dominance observed in patients with organic disease would also be present
in the normal subject if a greater number of subjects were tested.
3.

�a

m
9

TABLE

4.—Responses of Normal Children Three to Six Years of Age to Simultaneous Tests
of Different Body Combinations
Dominant

Dominant

Responses

Face Combinations
FACE-genitals i ...............
FACE-shoulder ................
FACE-buttock .................
FACE-foot ....................
FACE-breast ..................
FACE-back ....................
FACE-thigh ...................
FACE-abdomen ...............
FACE-hand ....................

Total
Errors*
57
79
52
77

74
74

47
66
71

Responses

,._—A_ﬁ
Other
Face

Part

38
65
35
65
65
55
38

19
14
17

51

64

Genitals Combinations
Genitals-FACE ................
Genitals-shoulder ..............
GENITALS-buttock ...........
GENITALS-foot ...............
Genitals-breast ................
Genitals-back ..................
GENITALS-thigh..............
GENITALS-abdomen ..........
GENITALS-hand ..............

12
9
19
9
15
7

Total
Errors

r—Aﬁ
Other
tals Part
Geni-

57
56
65
87
74
62
81

19
28
45
78
46
39
65
65
79

81

88

Dominant

Hand Combinations
Hand-FACE ...................
Hand-GENITALS .............
H and-SHOULDER ............

Hand-BUTTOCK ..............
Hand-FOOT ...................
Hand-BREAST ................
Hand-BACK ...................

.................

Hand—THIGH
Hand-ABDOMEN ..............

71

7

88
66
72
72
79
85
76
86

9

7
5

9
17
15
27
15

Other

Part

Shoulder Combinations
Shoulder-FACE ................
Shoulder-genitals ..............
Shoulder buttock ..............
Shoulder-foot ..................
SHOULDER-breast ............
SHOULDER-back .............
SHOULDER-thigh .............

64
79
59
67
63
62
70
49

SHOULDER—abdomen. .. . . . . .
SHOULDER-hand .............

71

Total
Errors
79
56
67
63
77
84
59

Buttock Combinations

Buttock-FACE ................
Buttock-GENITALS ...........
Buttock-shoulder..............
Buttock-FOOT ................

Buttock-breast ................

BUTTOCK-back ...............

Buttock-thigh .................

BUTTOCK-abdomen ..........
BUTTOCK-hand ...............

52
65
67
66
59
76
66
56
72

Part

17
20
42
21
30
49
31
40
67

35
45
25
45
29
27
35
16
5

74

66

Foot Combinations

Foot-FACE ....................
Foot-GENITALS ..............
Foot-shoulder .................
FOOT-buttock .................
Foot-breast ....................
Foot-back .....................
FOOT-thigh ...................

FOOT-abdomen ...............
FOOT-hand ....................

Total
Errors

12

9

32
45
32
31
47
40
63

Breast-FACE ..................
Breast-GENITALS ............
Breast-SHOULDER ...........

Breast-buttock ................
Breast-foot ....................
BREAST-back .................

Breast-thigh. . ................

BREAST-abdomen ............
BREAST-hand .................

74
74
77
59
61
64
50
64
79

9
28
21
29
29
42
26
47
62

65
46
56
30
32
22
24
17
17

Dominant

.

Back Combinations
Back-FACE ....................
Back-GENITALS ..............
Back-SHOULDER .............
Back-BUTTOCK ...............

Back-foot ......................

Back-BREAST .................
BACK-thigh ...................
Back-abdomen .................
BACK-hand ....................

Thigh Combinations
Thigh-FACE ...................
Thigh-GENITALS .............
Thigh-SHOULDER ............
Thigh-buttock .................
Thigh-FOOT ...................
Thigh-breast ...................
Thigh-BACK ...................
THIGH-abdomen ..............
THIGH-hand ..................
*

47
81
59
66
65
50
77
66
76

r—A—ﬁ
Other
Thigh Part
9
16

20
35
18
24
28
42
49

38
65
39
31
47
26
49
24
27

Part
65
78
31
21
29
35
18
17
9

Total
Errors
74
62
84
76
66
64
77
61
85

r-

Responses

Back
19
23
29
27
35
22
49
27
70

Other

Part
55
39
55
49
31

42
28
34
15

Dominant

Responses

Total
Errors

Other

Dominant

F—‘A—ﬁ
Other
Breast Part

65
28
42
32
21
29
20
26
7

Foot-

77
87
63
66
61
66
65
57
72

Responses

Breast Combinations

14
28
25
31
56
55

Responses

Dominant

Total
Errors

Part

Dominant

__Jk_ﬁ
Other

tock

der

39
48
59

Responses

f—But-

9

Shoul- Other

Dominant

Total
Errors

28
23
16
16

Responses

r-“—"'"—-—\
Hand

9

Dominant

Responses

Total
Errors

38
28
20

Responses

Abdomen Combinations
Abdomen-FACE ...............
Abdomen-GENITALS .........
Abdomen-SHOULDER ........
Abdomen-BUTTOCK ..........
Abdomen-FOOT ...............
Abdomen-BREAST ............

Abdomen—back

.................
Abdomen-THIGH .............
ABDOMEN-hand
..............

r———*—ﬁ
Total
Ade- Other
Errors
men Part
66
81
74
56

57
64
61
66
86

15
16
26
16
17
17
34
24
71

51

65
48
40
40
47
27
42
15

One_hundred tests done in each combination were analyzed statistically. The remaining 20 tests in each
combination were of homologous body parts and did not lend themselves to this type of analysis.
1 Capital letters indicate dominant
part as evidenced by a t test value of 5% or less.

�10

In testing normal subjects it was noted that they responded by mentioning the
face as being the area touched and only when questioned further did they mention
the hand. In other words, there was a preference for the face in the response.
In another series of simultaneous tests of 20 normal adults the following method
was used. Twenty normal adults were informed that they were to be touched on
two regions of the body and that they were to report only one of the two places
stimulated. The eyes were closed during these tests. Ten tests were done in 8 body
combinations in a random fashion (tests involving contralateral and homolateral
used
in working out the order of
in
similar
that
of
the
to
a
manner
body)
parts
TABLE 5,—Response on the

Initial Trial in N ormal Adults Tested in a Single Body Combination
Responses Indicating
Dominance of
Body Part

Combination of

Part
r———&amp;———-—m
Body

A

FACE *
FACE
Face
Face
Face
Face
BREAST
Shoulder
Penis
Thigh

Foot

Thigh

Breast

Shoulder
Breast

*

No.

of:

B

Subjects

Correct

Hand

160
94
17
30
31
30
76
30
30
30
54
30
30
32
18

77
58

Breast]
Shoulder
Penis
Back

Foot

Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand

Foot
Foot

Breast
Thigh

9
25
22
26
40
24
17
17

44
16
23
19
9

78

29
6
4
6

5

0
0
2

0
2
2
0
0

3
2
2
7
2

6
7
2

1

3

9

6
7
6

o

1

2

4
3

of. 5%

0

or less.

6.—Simnltaneons Touch Stimulations of Various Body Combinations

Body Combination
Face-hand ...............................................
Face-thigh ...............................................
Face-shoulder ............................................

Face-foot ................................................
Shoulder-hand ...........................................
Hand-thigh ..............................................
Thigh-foot ...............................................
Hand-foot ...............................................

There were

. .

0

4
31
2
11
.

Other
Responses

5
2
2
1
1

Capital letters indicate dominant part as evidenced by a chi-square value
TABLE

*

,———J\—-q
A
B

200

*

r—«Choices
Given—ﬂ
Hand 40
Face 160
Face
Face
Face
Shoulder
Hand
Thigh
Hand

175
142
167
158
141
103
114

Thigh
Shoulder

Foot

Hand
Thigh

Foot
Foot

25
58
33
42
59
97
86

tests for each combination.

dominance in Groups A and B. There were 200 tests in each combination. The
6.
in
Table
recorded
results
The
not
are
investigated.
genital regions were
From an analysis of Table 6 it is obvious that the face is the part of the body
which is chosen oftenest when it and other parts of the body are touched simul—
taneously. These ﬁndings support the results obtained by other methods. However,
this method of selection, when the subject knows that two parts of the body are
being touched, did not reveal the expected hand inferiority. This ﬁnding does
not necessarily detract from observations obtained by the methods described above,
where the subject was to report what he perceived after he was touched in two
places without warning.
After this series of tests each of these 20 subjects was asked to indicate which
part of the body they were the most and the least aware of during testing. The
results are tabulated in Table 7.

�11

Of signiﬁcance in both sets of these experiments is the fact that the face shows
a high dominance. However, it must be stressed again that the last two methods
do not reﬂect the low order of hand dominance.
4. Adults with Schizophrenia—When these patients made errors, the errors
were similar to those obtained in normal adults under the age of 65. Each patient
showed signiﬁcant dominance of the face to the hand as well as to the foot, the
breast to the hand and foot, and the penis to the hand and foot (Table 8).
The relationship of all the body areas has not been worked out so completely
in these subjects as in the preceding groups. The difﬁculty in demonstrating the

a“
TABLE 7.——Responses of

Twenty Patients as to Areas of Greatest and Least Dominance

Body Part Most Aware of

Face ..................................
Face and foot ........................
Face and thigh .......................
Hand ..................................

Foot

No. of

Body Part Least Aware of
Subjects
Thigh ..................................
10

Subjects
16
1

1

1

..................................

TABLE

No. of

1

Foot

..................................
Hand ..................................
Shoulder and thigh
...................
Foot and shoulder ....................
Not asked ..............................

1

1

8,—Response on the Initial Trial in Schizophrenic Adults Tested in a Single
Body Combination
Combination of
Body

Part

,——————J%
A
B
FACE *
Face
Face
Face
FACE
Face
Shoulder
BREAST
PENIS
Thigh

Foot

Thigh
BREAST
PENIS
Shoulder

*

4
3
1

Hand
Breast

Penis
Back

Foot

Shoulder
Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand
Hand

Foot
Foot
Foot

Breast

No. of

Subjects

Correct

72

24
52
23
29
25

81

30
42
37

13
31
77
43

2

19
29

2O

3!)
31

15

30
30
30
28

15
9
17
15

9

Responses Indicating
Dominance of
Body Part
f————N———ﬁ
A

B

Other
Responses

46

2
11
2
4

4
2
2

14
3
7
12
8
8
44
19
11
8
4
19
8
3

0
3
3

0
0

1

3

3
9

1

1

6

2

10

1

1

1

2

3

8

2

1

Capital letters indicate dominant part as evidenced by a chi-square value of 5% or less.

complete pattern in schizophrenic patients was the same as that encountered in
normal adults. They showed fewer perceptual errors on simultaneous tests than
did either patients with organic brain disease or children. These errors occurred
only during the intial trials, so that one subject could be tested for only one body
combinationi~
There were a number of patients with schizophrenia who presented bizarre
responses. The
touch stimuli were occasionally misidentiﬁed and were reported as “a burning”
or “a ﬂy
crawling.” At times the number of percepts were multiplied. Instead of perceiving the two
applied stimuli, they reported three or more percepts in a variety of body parts. Similarly,
a
single stimulus was reported as two or more percepts, the locus of the original stimulus being
occasionally omitted. Such patients usually persisted in the bizarre responses on repeated testing
on subsequent days. Several of the paranoid patients refused to close their
eyes but permitted
examination provided they could see.
I}:

�12

Senile Adults.—Studies of body combination tests in senile adults 65 to 96
of
the
disease
in
with
found
those
of
similar
results
showed
to
patients
age
years
brain and in very young children.‘ The most dominant region was the face and the
least dominant the hand. In plotting the errors on face-hand tests in normal subjects of all ages, we found that children under the age of 6 years and adults over
the age of 65 show the greatest incidence.
6. Supplementary Studies of Blind or Deaf Subjects.——While we were conducting the foregoing experiments, we, naturally, tried to ﬁnd an explanation for
face dominance. One of the thoughts we entertained was that normal subjects
developed the concept of the face being foremost in importance. It might be assumed
that the earliest sensory image a subject experiences would be the sight of the
mother during infancy. Therefore, the earliest memory of a person and his selfidentiﬁcation would be the visual image of a face. Moreover, young children who
are asked to draw the picture of a man draw the face ﬁrst and foremost, paying
less attention to other parts of the body. Goodenough 15 made similar observations
on the drawings of mentally retarded persons and patients with disease of the
brain. Since visual memory and imagery of a face would seem to be important in
one’s sensory experience, it was thought that the congenitally blind might not
respond as the normal subject does when he is tested with cutaneous stimulations.
With this in mind, a series of congenitally blind children and another series of
adults with an organic mental syndrome and long-standing acquired blindness were
tested with double simultaneous stimulation of the face and hand. Results showed
that there was no difference in the pattern of response between the blind and the
normal subjects.
A. Blind Subjects: I. Children. Forty-two normal children (3 to 14 years of
age) with congenital blindness were tested in face-hand and hand-foot combinations. Ten tests (heterologous and homolateral parts of the body) were done for
each combination in a random order.
The results obtained were as follows:
1. Of all children 6 years of age or younger who were congenitally blind, 79%
showed persistent errors after 10 trials of testing.
2. In the face-hand combination tests the following responses were obtained:
5.

Face Only

Face-Face

Hand Only

Hand-Hand

202

34

2

1

3. In the foot—hand combination tests the responses were as follows:
Foot-Foot and Partial
Displacement of
Hand-Hand
Hand Stimulus Hand Only
Foot Only
51

26

26

9

4. The pattern of all errors throughout the testing was the same as

that for

normal children without blindness.
II. Adults. Ten adults with an organic mental syndrome and blindness acquired
after childhood were tested with multiple face—hand tests. All showed persistent
errors. The analysis of all the errors are as follows:
Face Only
100

Face-Face
7

Hand Only

Hand-Hand

1

1

From this analysis it is obvious that preservation of vision in infancy is not

essential for face dominance.

�13

B. Deaf Subjects: We also thought of other causes for face dominance, namely,
that the touch applied to the face was not only felt but reinforced by the sound
stimulus produced by the touch on the face, which is so near the ear. To establish

or exclude this possibility, we studied a series of deaf people.
Thirty-two adults with deafness acquired in early infancy or childhood were
tested with multiple face—hand tests. These subjects were otherwise normal. They
had no evidence of disease of the brain. The results are indicated in Table 9.
Again we found face dominance. Hearing did not seem to be a factor in face

dominance.

COMMENT

From the foregoing studies it is obvious that we have been investigating perceptual functions from the standpoint of patterns. For many years Lashley§ has
been stressing the fact that the data obtained on neurologic examination should
always be analyzed with reference to pattern of activity. We did this in the compilation of our own results. By clinical observation we learned that when the
cutaneous sensory ﬁeld is examined under conditions of simultaneous stimulation
a distinct pattern is discerned. The pattern is most apparent in testing two non—
TABLE

9.—Incidence of Errors for Deaf Subjects, Initial and Subsequent Trials
Total No. of

Initial

Trial—*ﬁ—ﬁ

Subjects

Correct

Face Only

Face-Face

32

Hand Only

9

19

2

2

r—-———~—Initial and Subsequent Trials———ﬂ
Face Only
86

Face-Face

Hand Only

Hand-Hand

1

4

0

symmetric regions, far removed from each other and situated along the longitudinal
axis of the body. The resultant interaction between these two sensory stimuli yields
a characteristic pattern. In studying the data, it was learned that the face is the
most dominant region of the organism. The genital zone is next in the order of
dominance, while other parts of the body follow in a gradient, with the hand mani—
festing the least dominance. Thus, the most conspicuous gradient is between the face
and the hand. The pattern of response we obtained by testing with the method of
double simultaneous stimulation has been found consistently on numerous occasions, under a variety of conditions, and in many groups of subjects.
In considering our results, we naturally ask what the organizing principle of
this perceptual pattern might be, or with which neurophysiologic or psychophysio—
logic data it may be correlated. Why is the face the most dominant and the hand
the least dominant? Why does the genital region show a high dominance? What
determines such an order of dominance? Is it acquired by learning; is it inherent,
or is it a product of each? If it is inherent, what role does the body image play?
Anatomic or Neuro-“Electrical” Studies—In considering the anatomic substrate, we ﬁnd no apparent correlation of ﬁndings elicited on electrical studies of
the cerebral cortex with areas of the body which show dominance by our method
of stimulation. Some aspects of tactile sensory interaction have been discussed by
§

References 16 through 18.

�14
1" in their
and
Bard
Marshall, Woolsey,
mappings of the cerebral cortex of the
cat and monkey by the method of evoked action potentials. The map of the “sensory
cortex” as determined by electrical stimulation or evoked action potentials does
not serve to explain the order of dominance. It might be supposed that the degree
of dominance found in a part of the body would be proportioned to the area in the
cerebral cortex in which this part of the body is electrically represented. However,
this is not the case. The face and the hand, the most and the least dominant areas.
respectively, in our system of testing, have approximately equal representation in
the homunculus of the human cortex as determined by the method of electric
stimulation of the cerebrum.20
It is not certain whether electrical studies on neuron action will give us the
answer, for, as Lashley has repeatedly pointed out, most studies are made on
surgically isolated or anesthetized animals, and these are far from being in a
physiologic state. Our own clinical studies show patterning of sensory interaction
in the physiologic state of man, whether there is or is no disease of the brain. This
is a physiologic fact. The meaning of this fact, however, is not as yet clear. This
patterning of sensory interaction does not occur in any one region of the cortex.
It is the result of integration of perceptual function, which takes place in the entire
brain at the cortical, thalamic, and even lower levels of the nervous system. There
is no doubt that sensory interaction occurs, but that this interaction is patterned
and how it is patterned is still a mystery.
Psychophysiologic S‘tudies.—Our own psychophysiologic data also fail to shed
any light on our problem. Studies of thresholds of cutaneous sensations, types and
nature of stimuli, and attention of subject and sensorimotor responses did not offer
clues to a solution. Critchley,21 in his interesting article on tactile functions in the
blind. suggested that face dominance may be due to the sensitivity of the skin. It
does not seem to be a matter of thresholds,” for we have been working with crude
supraliminal stimulations. The stimuli we employed consisted for the most part
of ﬁrm taps or scratching and slapping of the face and hand, or repetitive or moving
stimulations, such as rubbing. Moreover, the tactile thresholds. as obtained in
different regions of the cutaneous sensory ﬁeld by use of the method of von Frey,23
using von Frey’s hairs (Table 10), or with a stimulus such as pinprick (Table ll),
show no strict correspondence to the “dominance” values obtained by the method
of simultaneous tactile or pinprick stimulations. The use of stronger or more
noxious stimuli, such a pinpricks, will reveal a lower incidence of errors, but the
pattern of dominance will be the same.
Nor is there any correlation between the acuity of the sense of two—point discrimination and the order of dominance. It will be recalled that the ability to
discriminate two points at the ﬁnger tips or at the hand is much greater than that
at many other parts of the body, excluding the lips and tongue; yet the hand shows
the lowest order of dominance. This lack of correspondence is contrary to the
hypothesis proposed by Denny-Brown, Meyer. and Horenstein, who studied
patients with lesions of the parietal lobe.“ In our studies of normal subjects and
of patients with disease of the brain, including that of the parietal lobe, we ﬁnd
no correlation between incidence of errors as elicited by the method of double
simultaneous stimulation and the two-point discriminative potentialities of a given
cutaneous area.

�15

Still another factor to consider is that of attention. Critchley,“ in a series of
papers, claims that it is a lack of attention which causes the imperception of one
of the two simultaneous stimuli in patients with lesions of the parietal lobe. As
expected, this type of sensory defect is apparent only on the side opposite the
cerebral lesion. It is especially pronounced in the hand and least manifest in the
face, thus reﬂecting a pattern with an order of dominance similar to the one
illustrated in normal children and in subjects with diffuse disease of the brain. If
this pattern in the parietal lobe lesion is interpreted as due to a lack of attenTABLE

10.—5timulus Threshold for Pressure, in Grams per Square Millimeter, After von Frey

Cornea ................................... 0.3
Conjunctiva ............................. 2.0
Tongue ................................... 2.0

...................................... 2.0
2.5
.......................................
Finger tip ................................ 3.0
Eyelid (edge) ............................. 3.0
Infraorbital area ........................ 3.0
Forehead ................................. 3.0
Hollow of palm .......................... 7
Dorsum of ﬁngers ........................ 5.0
Upper arm, ﬂexor surface ................ 7
Thigh, inner side .......................... 7
Forearm, ﬂexor surface .................. 8
Nipple .................................... 8
Anterior edge of deltoid ................. 9
Anterior edge of axilla .................. 11
Xyphoid process ......................... 11
Mucosa of. check .......................... 12
Nose
Lip

12
15
16
16
16
16
17
26
26
26
27
27
27
28

Prepuce ...................................
Spinous processes ........................
Medial edge of scapula
...................
Deltoid muscle ............................
Upper arm, extensor surface ..............
Abdomen ..................................
Oriﬁce of urethra
.........................
Thigh, outer side .........................
Areola of breast ..........................
Undersurface of breast ...................
Sole, noncalloused part ...................
Tibia ...................................... 28
Forearm, extensor surface ................ 33
Inguinal area ............................. 48
Glans penis ............................... 111
Sole, calloused part ....................... 250

11.—Stimulus Threshold for Pain, in Grams per Square Millimeter, After van Frey

TABLE

Cornea ....................................
Conjunctiva ..............................

.....................................
Abdomen ................... ...............
Forearm
Flexor surface ........................
Extensor surface
.
E yelid

0.2
2
10
15

.

Upper arm

...................

Flexor surface ........................
Outer condyle of humerus ................

.....................................
.......................................

Cheek

Calf

Hand, dorsum ............................
Foot, dorsum ............................
Calf .......................................

20
30
30
30
30
30

Upper thigh
Outer surface ------------------------ 30
Inner surface ......................... 30
Extensor surface ..................... 40
50
FOOL dorsum
............................
.
1v
Edild’ dorsum
100

llbla

""""""""""""""

......................................
Internal malleolus .......................
Hand, palm ..............................
Sole, callouscd portion ...................
Finger tip ................................

00
110
130
200
300

tion, it must be that the inattention is only on one side of the body, and particularly
in the hand. In other words, the term inattention becomes synonymous with defective perception produced by the parietal lobe lesion.
Nevertheless, attention tends to modify perceptual responses. According to
William James, “when the things to be attended are small sensations and when the
effort is to be exact in noting them it is found that attention to one interferes a
good deal with the perception of the other.”46 But does this explain the pattern in
dominance or in errors in perception as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2? It might
be claimed that man pays most attention to the face because he is most interested
H

References 25 through 28.

�16

in this part of the body. Such reasoning may explain face dominance, but it does
not account for the frequent errors made in the hand stimulus. The latter ﬁnding
would imply that man pays the least attention to the hand, less than to any other
part of the body. Now, it is hardly likely that one pays less attention to one’s hands
than to one’s back. Yet, according to our data, the back dominates over the hand,
implying that man is more interested in his back than in his hand. This is contradictory, and it becomes obvious that attention does not account for the order of
dominance as depicted in Figures 1 and 2. A defect in attention may crystallize
but not determine the pattern of perception as elicited by the method of double

simultaneous stimulation. Further evidence against the attention theory are the
recent experiments by Hooker.29 He found an order of dominance in sensation,
using double simultaneous touch stimulations, in the human fetus. Eventhough
the response to stimuli in his experiments involves an order lower than that implied
in our results, there was a distinct pattern under his conditions of testing in which
attention was not a factor. When there was simultaneous cutaneous stimulation of
the face and hand, the dominant motor response was that typical of the face.
An important principle to consider in the study of patterns of
response to
sensory stimuli is that every sensation has a motor component. Thus, when we
request the subject to report what is felt when the face and hand are touched
simultaneously, there must be an efferent, or a motor, element. The patient replies
verbally and tends to point to the spots touched. In a series of face—hand combination tests or in combinations involving the face and another body
part, it was
shown that the face is the ﬁrst to be indicated, whether it is pointed to with the
hand or announced verbally (Table 6). Since the hand is used in the pointing, it
would be the last of the two (face and hand) perceived regions to which the sub—
ject would point. On the contrary, the face would be the ﬁrst to be indicated. This,
however, is not always the case, for when both stimuli are perceived, the hand is
sometimes the ﬁrst to be indicated. This is particularly evident in combinations
which do not include the face. When both hands are stimulated, the incidence of
errors is very low and the subject often uses either hand to point to the other.
Learned and Inherent Perceptual Organization—Perceptual organization or
sensory correlation may proceed along two lines: (1) learning or individual acquisition of perceptions and (2) inherited or genetically determined perceptual
patterns. Acquired perceptions are organized in the course of experience by the
postulated mechanisms of pattern identiﬁcation, by a selective process, by sym—
bolization, and by conceptual organization. As Nissen states, “Symbolization helps
in perceptual organization also in connecting percepts with concepts to speciﬁc
30
responses.”
1. Learning Factor: There are
many who believe that all perceptions and perceptual patterns are acquired. Most perceptual reactions are learned during the
maturation period or infancy. In our own studies of perceptual patterns under
conditions of double simultaneous stimulation, we believe that awareness of the
part of the body, such as the genital region, is an example of learning. Infants or
children learn of and become aware of their genitals. Initially, when the pattern was
demonstrated in adults with disease of the brain, the high dominance manifested
in the genital region was not too surprising. The interpretation was that, due to its
special sexual connotation acquired by learning, there is more “awareness” of

�17

stimuli applied in this area. The question then arose as to what the pattern would
be in very young children. If sexual “awareness” was not yet operative, that is,
if the child had not yet learned of the social signiﬁcance of the genital
organs, one
might assume that there might be less dominance of the genital zone than in adults.
However, in our studies we found that young children were indeed “sensitive”
about their genitals. Most of the children under 6 years of age, even the very
youngest, who were just about able to cooperate in the perceptual tests, were
reluctant to expose this area or showed some form of embarrassment or curiosity
when their genitals were touched. Some refused to have more than a few tests done
at one time. Evidently this increased “awareness” is learned prior to 3 years of age.
Since we found a high dominance for the genital area in children, it might be
inferred that this high dominance is related to a sexual awareness which was
probably learned in the ﬁrst two to three years of life.
Schilderﬂ pointed this out in his discussion of the principles concerning the
libidinous structure of “the body image.” # He stated:
The attitude toward the different parts of the body can be determined by the interest the
persons around us give to our body. We elaborate our body image according to the experiences
we obtain through the actions and attitudes of others. The actions of others may provoke
sensations when they touch and handle us. But they may inﬂuence us also by words and actions
which direct our attention to particular parts of their body and our own body. . . . Early
infantile experiences are of special importance in this connection but we never cease gathering
experiences and exploring our own body.31

These principles of symbolization in perceptual .organization apply to genital as
well as to other regions of the body. From the psychoanalytic, or Freudian, point
of view the face and the mouth participate in the oral stage of body image, or, more
correctly, of body schema development. The same school emphasizes that the genital
region plays a great role in the development of the organism. Therefore, it should
not be surprising to ﬁnd the face and genital regions almost on the same level of
dominance as determined by double simultaneous stimulation.
References 31 and 32.
# Smythies,33 in a philosophical paper, criticized the confusion and the loose use of the
term “body image.” Thus, (a) there is “the body image” which describes “a visual, mental,
or memory image of a human body, one’s own or someone else’s.” Body images are experienced.
(b) Body schema should be used only in its original sense. It is part of the subconscious mind,
and thus its presence is inferred, and not experienced. The experiments of Stratton are a good
example of almost a pure disorder of the body schema. (c) Body concept is a conceptual
constellation and depends largely upon the proper function of the relevant memory mechanisms.
Anosognosia is an example of disorder of the body concept. (d) “The perceived body,” or
another name for it, “postural model of the body,” a term to be applied to the somatic sensory
ﬁeld—directly experienced inside central consciousness. An example of this is the experience
of having a phantom limb or autotopagnosia. The perceived body is identiﬁable with the “body
image in the brain.” (e) Actual physical body is a physical object and not the same as the perceived body. What one perceives as to body parts does not always correspond to the actual position of the physical body and vice versa. An example of this is found in the patient’s experiences
in mescaline intoxication, where the perceived body is not the same as the physical body. Also
the postures assumed in some of the dyskinesias are not always perceived. (f) Body image
in the brain of the physical body (theory of psychoneural identity). The homunculus
as
determined by electrical stimulation or destruction of brain tissues is an example.
While we agree with Smythies criticisms, it is sometimes extremely difﬁcult to use his
classiﬁcation of “experiences and description of the human body.” Nevertheless, in our subsequent discussions we shall try to use his terms wherever possible.
ﬂ

�18

Even though Schilder * proposed these theories, there are no clear—cut experi—
ments to show that the face is sensitized the most, and, for that matter, that the
hand is sensitized the least, in the maturation of the normal infant or child. As a
matter of fact, in the same book Schilder emphasized the importance of other
structures in the construction of the “body image.” In considering “sexual sensitization” of body parts in adults, one must compare such erogenous zones as the
breast and buttock with the genital region. Yet analysis of our data reveals no undue
dominance of the breast and buttock over nonerogenous regions, such as the foot
or abdomen. Perhaps there would be no incongruity in dominance of erogenous
zones if we interpreted our data from the standpoint of age, sex, personality, and
social background of the subject. Under such conditions we might have found
different gradients in each group and concluded that sensitizations of the body parts
by learning are, after all, important, but not necessarily the principal factor in
determination of the pattern.
In this connection the question of the development of the “body image” arises.
How does the “body image” develop? Schilder admits that we have no reliable
information as to how this development takes place. He said that there is “reason
to believe that there is an inner development, maturation, . . . and there are inner
factors, which are given in the organism and comparatively independent of experience which determines this development.” He also believed that “the process of
maturation gets its ﬁnal shape through individual experience.” Thus, there is a
factor of maturation which forms the basic structure of the body image, whereas
experience and learning inﬂuence the trends of the development. Maturation and
learning are essential features of all types of development, whether it is body image,
body schema, body concept, perceived body, or perception itself. These conclusions
are partly supported by the experiments of Gesell.34
If this sort of reasoning, namely, development of the body image in infancy,
accounts for face—genital dominance, what explains the inferiority of the hand, as
determined by this series of tests? When the hand is considered in the spectrum
of the “body image,” there seems to be no prominent reason for its inferior position.
According to Schilder, the hand is an important structure in the formation of the
“body image.” The “body image” is continuously inﬂuenced by the almost constant
optic image of its hands. One sees his own hands more frequently than any other
part of his own body. In fact, perceptually and from the motor standpoint the hand
is one of the most important structures in the “perceived body.” Katz 35 says that
the hand makes the most vivid impression. Despite this, it is curious that the hand
is least dominant when it is tested simultaneously with another body part.
2. Inherent Factor: Thus far we have discussed the factor of learning in
perception as the basis for the pattern we obtained on double simultaneous stimu—
lation. It is possible that “learning” during infancy might explain part of, but not
the entire, pattern of sensory organization under conditions of double simultaneous
stimulation. However, our results show that the factor Of “learning” did not enter
in our own tests. An analysis of the responses obtained on the ﬁrst trial in many
children showed that the face was most dominant and the hand was least dominant.
In this situation there was no opportunity for learning; yet this pattern was found
on the initial tests in most subjects. The same consistent initial response was obtained
*

References

31

and 32.

�19

in tests of combinations of other body regions, such as the hand and the thigh, etc.
These ﬁndings strongly suggest that the patterns we obtained are not the result
of a learning process during testing but may be due to inherent
sensory organization.
This theory is supported by the preliminary studies of Hooker.29 Working with
human fetuses, he found that double tactile simultaneous stimulation of the face
and hand resulted only in the face reactions. When the hand and foot were tested,
there was only the hand response. Thus, there was an order of dominance in which
the face dominated over the hand and the hand over the foot. Although the pattern
Hooker obtained in the fetus is not exactly the same as the one we obtained under
our conditions of double simultaneous stimulation in young children, the fact
remains that a pattern has been observed before the organism had an opportunity
to learn. Carmichael,36 after reviewing the available experimental data, concludes
that there is only little evidence that learning modiﬁes fetal behavior. If it is assumed
that the pattern is determined inherently, one should consider the role the body
image plays in organization of perception or in the order of perceptual dominance.
3. Organization of Perception in the Perceived Body, Body Image, and
Body
Concept: (a) Perceived body. In a discussion of the inherent properties of perception we must consider the role of the “perceived body.” There is a theory that mid—
line structures of the body dominate over the lateral or peripheral
parts. In his
monograph on the body image, Schilder emphasized the dominance of the midline
structures. This theory considers the long axis of the body as being the dominant
over other regions. Part of the same theory is that proximal parts of a limb dominate
over distal regions. In our own experiments it is true that the face and the genital
region, both midline or axial regions, are the most dominant parts of the perceived
body. However, this axial theory does not account for the gradients as depicted in
the graph we plotted from our data. There are some midline or axial structures
which show no signiﬁcant dominance over the lateral parts. Thus, the foot, a lateral
area, is dominant or equal to the thigh, which is a proximal area, and to the buttock,
which is an axial structure. Moreover, there is a differentiation of dominance along
the longitudinal axis of the body itself. Thus, the face or the genital region is
dominant over the abdomen, buttock, or midback.
A second hypothesis is the one proposed by Cohn.37 This is similar to the ﬁrst.
Cohn proposed that the pattern of dominance, as elicited by the method of double
simultaneous stimulation, is inherently organized on the basis of rostral dominance,
i. e., the theory that the face is the most dominant
part of the organism, while the
remaining body areas show a descending gradient along the longitudinal axis. The

rostral parts are dominant over the more caudal areas. This theory is consistent
with the extensive observations on the development of the vertebrate nervous
system, in which a rostral—caudal gradient is demonstrated in phylogenesis.38 This
gradient is manifest in the progressive differentiation of the rostrum until, in
Mammalia, the cerebrum is fully differentiated. The gradient is also manifest in
biochemical and physiologic reactions at each phylogenetic level. Similar gradients
have been demonstrated for the musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal systems. A
rostrocaudal order of sensory development has also been shown to exist in onto—
genesis in studies of the fetus with single stimulations.39 More recently, Hooker 29
found such an order in human fetuses when the face and hand, or hand and foot,
were touched simultaneously. Our own data support this theory of rostrality only
in part, inasmuch as there is face dominance. However, other facts tend to contra-

�20

dict the theory of rostrality. There is no continuous downward gradient between
the rostral and the caudal region. Even though the face is most dominant, there are
caudal body parts which are dominant over some of the more rostral regions. For
example, the foot is dominant to the hand and the thigh. Most signiﬁcant is the
dominance of the genital region to all more rostral areas except the face. From
the foregoing data one must conclude that the concept of rostrocaudal order of
be
the
fetal
There
the
is
not
beyond
applicable
stage.
organization
may
sensory
factor of learning and maturity in the postnatal stage. More studies of double
simultaneous stimulation in different parts of the body of the human fetus, particularly the genital region, may shed more light. Similar studies in the ﬁrst year
of life will help us in understanding the development and organization of perception in man.40
(1)) Body image and body concept. Another theory can be evolved in considering the relation of the body to its inner self or that of the ego to its outer world.
This concept implies that the ego has a center and a periphery region, just as the
perceived body has an inside and an outside. We observe ourselves (inside) as we
observe others (outside). When one thinks of himself, what Schilder called
autoscopy,32 there is an image of one’s own face. This is a good example of what
is meant by body image. Children in making drawings of a man indicate the face,
while other parts of the body are less often illustrated.15 Even congenitally blind
children, in whom the hands and ﬁngers are of especial importance, model the head
41 and the
region of the mouth as being the most conspicuous”?
too
large
as being
In expressing the concept of the ego in terms of body parts, the face is visualized
is
face
the most
The
other
than
structure.
the
to
more
foreground
comes
any
or
distinguishing part of the organism itself. The face represents the most central or
inner portion of the ego. In narcissism the self-interest in one’s body is directed
chieﬂy to the face. Claparéde,42 in his studies on localization of the self, concluded
that the ego is conceived as being in the head. More speciﬁcally, he believed the
center of the ego is situated between the eyes. As for the genital region, there are
of
the
this
would
who
body
the
identify
area
psychoanalysts,
particularly
many,
with the inner part of the ego.
The part of the body which has to do with reproduction is probably just as
“deeply in” or central in the organism’s concept of the body as is the head, with
its face, mouth, eyes, etc. In considering the genital region, it is not always easy
to determine whether the importance attached to this part of the body is due to
inherent or to acquired factors. There is a great deal of literature on this subject,
but it is still difﬁcult to ascertain what role the inherent factor plays as opposed
to the learning factor.
Applying the theory of centrality, i. e., that the face-genital regions are innermost in the ego and in the body concept, we are faced with the problem of ﬁtting
the hand into this theory. In contrast to the concept of the face or genitals being
central, the hand is mostly on the periphery. The hand is the medium with which
we or our ego makes contact with the peripheral or outside world. The hand is on
the periphery of our ego structure and, with the aid of vision, is the most important
tool for exploration of the outer world. One might argue that the foot, although a
distal structure, also makes contact with the outer world. However, in this task the
1'

von Stockert,

F.: Quoted by Critchley.21

�21

hand, in most instances, is used more than the foot. Moreover, the impression gained
is that the foot is more inward—it seems more protected and hidden by shoes. In
summary, it would appear that from the standpoint of body concept organization
within the ego, the face and the genitals are the most inwardly situated, while the
hand is least centrally or most peripherally situated in the conceptual organization
of body parts within the ego. Now if we correlate the latter hypothetical pattern
with the pattern we found in our perceptual tests, we create some sort of congruity
between the two, namely, (a) face dominance as obtained on perceptual tests with
face as the most inner portion of the ego, and ([9) hand inferiority with hand as
the most peripheral portion of the ego. From this it might be inferred that the ego
may play a role in the determination of the perceptual pattern. We realize that this
is a highly theoretical explanation. Obviously, the concept of the hand being the
most distal, and the face the most central, portion in the organization of perception
in body image needs testing. We also realize that our results may be colored by an
obscure artifact, although we have checked our data by a variety of methods and
conditions of testing.
If this concept is at all valid, it should be applicable to functions other than
those of cutaneous senses. Thus, the concept of “central” portions dominating over
the periphery may be found in studies of vision. Observations drawn from patients
with mental changes consequent to diffuse brain disease show domination of central
over peripheral vision. Goldsteini and others have found that in these patients
constricted ﬁelds of vision are not uncommon. When such a patient is instructed
to ﬁx at a central target and report whether he sees another target simultaneously
in the periphery of the ﬁeld, the response is that the central target is observed and
not the one in the periphery.45
In studies of visual responses of these patients to rapid exposures of images
with groups of ﬁgures, it was noted that they reported what they saw in the central
portion of the ﬁeld only, often not observing the peripheral ﬁgures. Similar results
were obtained in tachistoscopic examinations of mentally defective persons. In all
these cases the results were uniform, namely, the perception of the central, but
not of the peripheral, ﬁgures. Thus, when the cutaneous sensory ﬁeld is compared
with the visuosensory ﬁeld, the face seems to correspond to the macular region,
and the hand, to the most peripheral part of the ﬁeld of vision. On further com—
parison, it might be inferred that central vision is identiﬁable with the ego in the
same manner as is the face. The optic image we have of ourselves or of others is
situated in the central portion of the ﬁeld of vision. Our ego is projected in the
central regions of the perceptual ﬁeld. In considering these patterns for perceptual
function, we touched on the topic of conceptual functions. When the subject of
the ego is discussed, a pattern for thinking becomes obvious. It is well known that
most of our thoughts are pointed directly or indirectly toward ourselves, and we
think least of what is most peripheral to or away from the ego. This subject has
been amply discussed by William James in his “Principles of Psychology.” The
object of mentioning the parallel was to point out the principle that similar patterns
exist in all types of perceptual functions, as well as in conceptual and motor
functions.
:1:

References 43 and 44.

�22
SUMMARY

Tests of simultaneous tactile stimulation involving many different body combinations were applied to patients with an organic mental syndrome, normal children, normal adults, and schizophrenic adults. By the use of these simultaneous
touch stimuli, a pattern in cutaneous perception was demonstrated in which the
face, as well as the genital region, was the most perceptive or dominant body area,
whereas the hand showed the least dominance. The remainder of the body regions
fell between these two extremes in the form of a mild gradient. No one theory
adequately explains the organization of this pattern. Learning and maturation are
probably factors, but it appears to be mostly inherent. The pattern is found in the
normal subject but is accentuated in the presence of disease of the brain.
REFERENCES
Head, H., and others: Studies in Neurology, London, Oxford University Press, 1920.
2. Pearson, G. H. J.: Effect of Age on Vibratory Sensibility, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
20:482-496, 1928.
3. Jaffe, J., and Bender, M. B.: Factor of Symmetry in the Perception of Two Simultaneous
Cutaneous Stimuli, Brain 75:167—176, 1952.
4. Green, M. A., and Bender, M. B.: Cutaneous Perception in the Aged, A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 69:577-581, 1953.
5. Cohn, K: On Certain Aspects of the Sensory Organization of the Human Brain: III.
Patterned Response to Three Simultaneously Applied Cutaneous Stimuli, Neurology 2‘»:140-143,
1.

1952.

An Experimental Study of Simultaneous Stimulations of the Sense of
Touch, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 20:169-184, 1893.
7. Oppenheim, H.: Diseases of the Nervous System, Neurol. Centralbl. 4:529—533, 1885.
8. Green, M. A.; Fink, M., and Bender, M. B.: Order of Dominance in Cutaneous Perception, Tr. Am. Neurol. A., pp. 238—240, 1952.
9. Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception, American Lectures in Neurology, No. 120,
Springﬁeld, 111., Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 1952.
10. Bender, M. B.; Fink, M., and Green, M. A.; Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous
Tests of Face and Hand, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 66:355—362, 1951.
ll. Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F., and Schappell, A. W.: Extinction Phenomenon in
Hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 62:717-724, 1949.
12. Jaffe, J., and Bender, M. B.: Perceptual Patterns During Recovery from General
Anesthesia, J. Neurol., Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat. 14:316-321, 1951.
13. Fink, M.; Green, M. A., and Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile
Stimuli by Mentally Defective Subjects, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 117:43-49, 1953.
14. Shapiro, M. F.; Fink, M., and Bender, M. B.: Exosomesthesia or Displacement of
Cutaneous Sensation into Extrapersonal Space, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 68:481-490,
6. Krohn, W.

0.:

1952.

Goodenough, F. L.: Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings, Yonkers-on-Hudson,
N. Y., World Book Company, 1926.
16. Lashley, K. 5.: Problem of Cerebral Organization in Vision, Biol. Symposia 7:301-322,
15.

1942.

Lashley, K. 8.: Functional Interpretation of Anatomic Patterns, A. Res. Nerv. &amp; Ment.
Dis., Proc. (1950) 30:529—547, 1952.
18. Lashley, K. 5.: Serial Ordering of Action, in Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior, edited
by L. A. Jeffress, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1951.
19. Marshall, W. H.; Woolsey, C. N., and Bard, P.: Observations on Cortical Somatic
Sensory Mechanisms of Cat and Monkey, J. Neurophysiol. 4:1-24, 1941.
17.

�23
20. Penﬁeld, W., and Rasmussen,

T.: The Cerebral Cortex of Man: A Clinical Study of

Localization of Function, New York, The Macmillan Company, 1950.
21. Critchley, M.: Tactile Thought, with Special Reference to the Blind, Brain 76:19-35,
1953.

22. Berlin, L. ; Goodell, H., and Wolff, H. G.: Relation of Pain Threshold and Pain Intensity
to the Phenomenon of Extinction, Tr. Am. Neurol. A., pp. 229-231, 1953.
23. von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Physiologie des Schmerzsinns, Ber. u. Verhandl. konigl.
siichs. Gesellsch. Wissensch., Leipzig, Math.—phys. C1. 47:185-196 and 283-296, 1894.
24. Denny-Brown, D.; Meyer, J. S., and Horenstein, S.: The Signiﬁcance of Perceptual
Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion, Brain 75:433-471, 1952.
25. Critchley,
26. Critchley,

M.: The Parietal Lobes, London, Edward Arnold &amp; C0., 1953.
M.; Russell, W. R., and Zangwill, 0.: Discussion on the Parietal Lobe

Syndromes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 44:337-346, 1951.
27. Critchley, M.: Problem of Awareness or Non-Awareness of Hemianopic Field Defects,
Tr. Ophth. Soc. U. Kingdom (1949) 69:95-109, 1950.
28. Critchley, M.: Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference to Parietal
Lesions, Brain 72:538-561, 1949.
29. Hooker, D.; Early Human Fetal Behavior with a Preliminary Note on Double Simultaneous Fetal Stimulation, A. Res. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis., Proc., to be published.
30. Nissen, H. W.: Phylogenetic Comparison, in Handbook of Experimental Psychology,
edited by S. S. Stevens, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1951.
31. Schilder, P.: The Image and the Appearance of the Human Body, Psyche Monograph
No. 4, London, George Routledge &amp; Sons, Ltd., and Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner &amp; C0., Ltd.,
1935.

32. Schilder,

P.: Mind Perception and Thought

in Their Constructive Aspects, New York,

Columbia University Press, 1942.
33. Smythies, J. R.: Experience and Description of the Human Body, Brain 76:132-145, 1953.
34. Gesell, A.: Maturation and Infant Behavior Pattern, Psychol. Rev. 36:307-319, 1929.
35. Katz, D.; Gestalt Psychology, translated by R. Tyson, New York, The Ronald Press
C0., 1950.
36. Carmichael,

L.: Ontogenetic Development, in Handbook of Experimental Psychology,

edited by S. S. Stevens, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1951.
37. Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the Human Brain: A Study
in Rostral Dominance as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment.
Dis. 113:471, 1951.
38. Child, C. M.: Origin and Development of the Nervous System, Chicago, University of
Chicago Press, 1921.
39. Hooker, D.; Prenatal Origin of Behavior, Porter Lectures, Series 18, Lawrence-Kansas
City, University of Kansas Press, 1952.
40. Carmichael, L.: Onset and Early Development of Behavior, in Carmichael, L., Editor:
Manual of Child Psychology, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1946.
41. Bakwin, R.: The Blind Child, J. Pediat. 35:120-128, 1949.
42. Claparede, E.: Note la localisation du moi, Arch. Psychol. 19:172, 1924.
43. Goldstein, K.: Constriction of Visual Fields, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 50:486-487, 1943.
44. Goldstein, K.: Mental Changes Due to Frontal Lobe Damage, J. Psychol. 17:187-208,
1944.

45. Bender, M. B., and Teuber, H.

L.: Ring Scotoma and Tubular Fields: Their Signiﬁ-

cance in Cases of Head Injury, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 56:300-326, 1946.
46. James, W.: The Principles of Psychology, New York, Henry Holt &amp; C0., 1890; reprinted
by Dover Publications, 1950.
Printed and Published in the United States of America

�F‘J‘

5‘

~24"

amass

or

by Doctors:

PM“. cameraman urn axmrunous mm:
lorriskl‘. lender,

sum A. a... m In: nun

Several series of noraal adults, norsal children. patients with
organic aental eyndroee and patients with schisophrenia.were tested‘
i
for the1r ability to perceivesiaultaneoue tactile stiauli.
Iith his eyes closed. the subject was touched sisultaneonelyx
on two different areas of his body and ashed to report what he perceived
and to localise the percepts. the responses to this aethod of testing
,

in all subjects fell into two general groups. The subject either
reported both stisuli correctly or reported only one correctly and
either did not perceive the second stiaulus (extinction) or sislocalised

it

(displaceaent). If the right face—left hand were tested, for
'esasple. the subject sight report the face stiaulus correctly and

either not perceive the stisulus on the hand or aislocalise the hand
stianlns to the left cheek and so report that he felt a single stisulus
on each

side of the face.

*1sentyy

patients with organic sental syndroae

and 20 noraal

children 3-d years of age were tested in all possible coabinations
of two between the aajor body areas. lach subject received 540 tests
in a randos order.. Testing was done with the subject cospletely nude.
When the incidence of errors in the different body areas was
analysed by statistical sethods, a significant and similar relationship
between these areas was found in both groups of subjects. lrrors were
least fequent in the face and genital sons. These were designated as
the scat dominant regions. lrrors were aost frequent in the hand when
it was tested with any other body part. when all the body parts were
thus coapared, a gradientias established with the following order of
dosinance: the face and genital region. followed by abdoeen. breast,
buttock, foot. back. shoulder and thigh. Bosinance was least apparent
“in the hand.

�Thros other groups consisting of 593 norssl adults, 53:
schizophrsnio adults sod 527 pstionts with orgsoio’ssntslisynorons
'

sore tsstodwin.vsrioos body ooshinstions. In those coshiostions is
lvhich.¢osinsnos was sppsrsnt, the order of dosinsnoo sss.sinilar.
'to that found in tho prooooding groups.
this ordor oi.dosinsnco on oisoltsnoous stinulstion sppssrs

.to ho so ishsrsnt psttsrn or organisation. It is prosont in nor-31
children 3~8 yosrs of sgs sad in nor-slisdults. Tbs psttsrn is
sxsggorsfod sad Inch sors sppsrsnt in pstissts with disosss of tho
brsin.
h

I

I

V

_

lerioos thsoriss oxplsining this psttsrn, particularly.tho‘
closonsss of tho toes sud gsnitsl rsgions, sill ho disousssd.

,'

,

'.‘
4

I

C’v

w?”

4.4/{L4/1A

r”
.

If-

7” (Ia

.

.\

ﬁn.

.‘

"

,

an.“ "the

1
‘3

a,
,

v

.h
‘7“ ‘v‘

_.

A

‘

,3.
'1

I"
.iv

/

as“

f’

M

“

,

a

3i“

x'
-

‘

,

' z’ i

»

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2334">
                <text>Patterns of perceptual organization with simultaneous stimuli. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1954 Aug; 72(2): 233-55.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2335">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2336">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-7b-011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2337">
                <text>1954</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2338">
                <text>Bender, Morris B; Green, Martin A.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2339">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2340">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2341">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry August 1954, Vol. 72, pp. 233-255</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2342">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2343">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74436">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80997">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87558">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94119">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="252" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="43">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/31ade8ace56aaea325e0c1b5774137fb.pdf</src>
        <authentication>34c1dccec8167a1f1d6a23f225341ecc</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100669">
                    <text>F

,

Perception of

Eknbedded

Figures after Induced

Cerebral Trauma

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. and

Max

Fink,

M.D.

1/?

"a

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

M—927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service.

Aided by grant

Presented
11—27-57

at

American Psychological Association, New York, August, 1957.

NJ.

�Perception of

Embedded

Figures after Induced

Cerebral.Trauma

Studies of complex visual perception
man

are not always clear or consistent.

after cerebral
The

damage

in

disagreements may be due,

in part, to difficulties in evaluating the extent of the disease process
or the degree of alteration in cerebral function. In contrast, conditions
in'Which there is control of the degree of brain damage, as in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), provide a unique opportunity

for studying this

problem.
While investigations of brain-injured populations have focused an

the role of location of lesion on behavior, current studies of
emphasized the
been shown

to

EDT.

have

factor of individual differences. marked.variability has

for perceptual (l), behavioral (2)

and physiological reSPonses

In addition, various personality (h) and social factors (5) have

1.

C. Landis, D. Dillon and S. Leopold, Changes

2.

M.

3.

R.L. Kahn,

'

ECT

in flicker-fusion

threShold are in choice reaction time induced by electroconvulsive
therapy, J. Psychol., bl, 1956, 61-80.

Fink, R.L. Kahn and M. A. Green, Experimental studies of the
Electroshock process, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. (in press).
M. Fink and E.A. weinstein, Relation of amobarbital test
to clinical improvement in electroshock, A.M.A. Arab. Neurol. &amp;

PWChiato, 76’ 1956, 23-29;

Fink and R.L. Kahn, Relation of

EEG delta activity to behavioral
in
electroshock; quantitative serial studies, A.M.A. Arch.
response

M.

Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. 78, 1957, 516-525.

h.

R. L. Kahn and M. Fink, Personality

5.

R. L. Kahn, M. Pollack ahd

factors in behavioral response

to Electroshock, Conf. Neural. in press).

F. Fink, Social factors in.the selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, J. Hillside Hosp., 6,

1957, 216-228.

�-2been related to differences

In the course of

an

in reSponse to treatment.

investigation of the perceptual

and behavioral

changes with ECT, a convulsive-subconvulsive control study was undertaken.

In this report, performance

on complex

visual tasks is presented.

Specific-

ally, the aim.was to determine whether perceptual change induced by ECT
is related to the degree of altered brain function and clinical behavioral
change; and whether the pretreatment perceptual pattern was related to

physiologic changes with treatment.
The method used

in the study

was the perception of embedded geometric

figures - a technique which has been Widely
studies of perceptual changes

accompanying

in recent years in
cerebral dysfunction (6).
employed

Lethe:
1) Population:
were
22

Fifty-three consecutive patients referred for

studied. These included

16 men and 37 women, with ages ranging_fran

to 66 with a median of h9 years.

into

ECT

The

patients

two groups. An experimental group of 29

were divided

at

patients (Convulsive

random
A)

received grand.mal electrotherapy with pentothal premedication three times
a week, using
C—h?

either a Medcraft alternating current instrument or a Reiter

electrostimulator.

A

minimum of 12

treatments were given.

of treatments was determined by the supervising

The number

psychiatrist in charge of

clinical criteria. A control group of
treated in similar faShion, except that only subconvulsive

the treatment unit on the basis of
2h

6.

patients

was

5. Battersby, H.P. Krieger, M. Pollack and M. B. Bender, Figure
ground discrimination and the "abstract attitude" in patients with
cerebral neoplasms, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76, 1956, 369-379;
H. L. Teuber and S. Weinstein, Ability to discover hidden figures
after cerebral lesions, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 763 1956,
369-379; F. Pollack, W.S. Battereby and M. B. Bender, Figure-ground
discrimination in patients with cerebral tumor, presented at Eastern
Psychological Association, 1957.

W.

�"1

-3stimulation was given following the pentothal. Fourteen patients in the
control group

were subsequently given a

regular course of convulsive

therapy (Convulsive B).
2)

Perceptual task: In the week prior to treatment and on the

day following the 12th treatment each

patient was tested with a modifica-

tion of Gottschaldt's hidden figures developed
The

by Battersby

subject is presented with a page containing

geometric

figure,

figure is

embedded

it

and below

(fig. 1).

-a

simple

a complex figure in which the simple
The

patient is asked to trace a Specific
by

geometric figure from the background/outlining
~The

two fonns

gt 2;.(7).

it with a

colored pencil.

discriminations ranged in complexity from relatively simple to more

complex. There were 25 such discriminations.
was allowed

for each. Performance

of errors.

To minimize a

was

A

maximum of two minutes

scored in terms of total number

practice effect

two

equivalent forms of the test

were used.
3)

Evaluation of physiologic change:

Two

the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital

tests of brain function -

test

(8)

-

were given to

at weekly intervals during treatment.

each

patient prior to,

7.

Battersby, Krieger, Pollack and Bender, op.

8.

E. A. weinstein, R.L. Kahn, L.A. Sugarman and L. Linn, Diagnostic
use of amobarbital sodium ("amytal sodium") in organic brain
disease, Am. J. Peychiat., 112, 1953, 889-89h.

and

cit.,

The

703-712.

�.uelectroencephalogram was evaluated as to the degree of delta activity
induced according

to criteria previously published (9)°

’The

amobarbital

test for brain disease was noted as positive or negative according to the
standardized criteria (10). The results of these tests obtained during
the second, third and fourth weeks of treaunent furnished the criteria
for physiological change.

A

combined physiological index was obtained

by ascribing to each high degree delta

barbital test a score of one.
ranged from zero to six.
h)

EEG

record and each positive amo-

The range of

Behavior ratings: Each

physiological alteration thus

patient's behavior

was

evaluated

at

weekly

intervals. After the 12th treatment, a rating for the degree of behavioral
change was made according to

»..none.

These

ratings of

four classes: marked, moderate,

change were

minimal or

not value judgments as to the quality

of change, but rather quantitative estimates of differences in behavior

patterns under similar conditions of observation.
vpatterns as euphoria, paranoia or withdrawal might

[Thus such behavior

all

be

rated as equivalent

degrees of quantitative change, although the implications of each for qual-

itative evaluation of

9.
10.

improvement were

Fink and Kahn, op.

cit.,

quite different.

éin~pressl. 37$-5§ﬁn.

'Weinstein, Kahn, Sugarman and Linn, op.

cit.,

889-89h.

�Results:
pre-treatment and treatment scores

The

number of

errors with treatment is

intragroup analysis

shows

shown

and the mean change

for

each group

that the subconvulsive group

in the

in Table I.

made

The

significantly

fewer errors during treatment, while the combined convulsive patients made

significantly more.
TABLE

I

Intragroup Comparisons for

Number

Before and During

ECT

Mean No.

Type of Treatment

Subconvulsive
Convulsive

A

Convulsive

B

Before

E}

ECT

of Errors

Errors
During

EDT

Difference p_*

2h

9.96

7.67

-2.29

4:1.02

29

10.59

12.62

+2.03

NS

7.36

10.1h

+2.79

‘=1.05

+2.28

“=1.02

**

1h

Combined Convulsive

h3

‘

* Intragroup analyses in this and subsequent tables based on
Wilcoxon's method of paired replicates.
** Patients originally in control group, then placed on convulsive

treatment.

group

is

period.

The score obtained during treatment

used here as the pretreatment score

Prior to treatment. subcgnvulsive patients

made

in the control

for the convulsive
approximately the

same

number of

errors as the original convulsive group. During treatment, however, subconvulsive subjects made fewer errors (7.67), while the errors in
convulsive patients increased to 12.62 errors - a difference significant

at better than the

1%

level of confidence.

�-6When

the data is analyzed with respeCt to physiologic change, significant

increases in errors are found only in those patients with the greater
degrees of physiologic change. This relationship is present in analysis
of the amobarbital

tests are

test

and the

combined (Table

EEG

as separate indices, and when the two

II).
TABLE

II

Intragroup Comparisons for Number of Errors Before and After
ECT in Relation to Degree of Physiological Change
.

Physiological Index

N

Mean Difference in Number of
Errors during Treatment

Amobarbital Test.

or

None

positive

one

13

-O.23

NS

28

+3.714

.01

23

+1.73

NS

18

+3.33

.05

3

21

+1.00

h to 6

us

20

+3.90

.01

Two

or three

positive

Electroencephalogram

or

None

one

High Delta
Two

or three

High Delta

.

.

Combined Physiological
0

to
The

in

relationship between

number of

ﬂue degree

errors during treatment is

of behavioral change
shown

with no, minimal or moderate behavior changes

difference in
made

number of

errors.

in Table

III.

do not show an

and the change

Those

patients

appreciable

Those with marked behavior changes, however,

significantly more errors during treatment.

�TABLE

III

Intragroup Comparisons for Number of Errors Before and During
ECT in Relation to Degree of Behavioral Change
Degree of Behavioral Change

Difference Nnmber
Errors During Treatment

Mean

N

_
marked

2h

Moderate

1h

p

&lt;1.0l

+3.58

+1.00

NS

-0.h0

NS

l

Minimal

or

5

None

Analysis of the pretreatment error scores in relation to the degree
of physiological change

is

shown

in Table

IV.

The

results

show

that subjects

with large pretreatment error scores manifest greater degrees of physiolog-

ical

change during treatment.

Patients with

little physiological

change

during convulsive therapy had a mean pretreatment score of 7.88, while

physiological effects,

had a mean pretreatment

score of 13.25 errors. The triserial correlation
the .05 level of confidence.

is +.3h, significant at

those

who developed marked

TABLE

IV

Relation of Pretreatment errors to Eventual Degree of Physiological
Change During Treatment
N

Mean Number

Errors Prestreatment

Physiologic Change:
o

to

211’

3/ and

my

16

7.88

19

11.21

�Qualitative Data:
Alterations in size of figure or in

minor aspects of form were common

types of error during both testing periods. Certain qualitative patterns
were

frequently noted during treatment,

however, which occurred only

or to a lesser extent in the pretreatment period.

patients to
.was

make no

It

was common

attempt to trace the more complex figures.

rarely

for
This response

often associated with a generalized withdrawal reaction in which the

patient

was unreSponsive to any stimulus or procedure.

Others became

hostile and negativistic toward the testing.

l

i

Patients

wiﬂn

the greatest

amount of physiological change seemed to

difficulty following instructions. They would trace the lines indiscriminately without regard for the Specific figure to be outlined, repeated

have
‘

a previous figure despite changes in the

actually existed,
the

more complex

and impulsively, and showed

Such

little

drew

lines

where none

trace the stimulus figure while ignoring

and attempted to

test figure.

test figure,

patients were likely to respond quickly

concern about making an error even

they might spontaneously comment, "I

know

that's

not

right."

when
‘

�Discussion:

results of this study clearly danonstrate a relationship between
the degree of cerebral dysfunction and perceptual alteration. Patients
‘The

with subconvulsive stimulation

make fewer

errors

on

retesting.

A

slight

decrease or no change in errors occurred in those patients receiving
vulsive therapy

who showed

only minimal physiological changes.

vulsive patients, however, with the
showed a

significant increase in

alteration,
of errors. This interrelation-

number

is in

accord with studies of patients

with altered brain function due to head injury and brain tumor.

(ll),

The con-

most marked physiological

ship of brain fUnction and perception
and Weinstein

con—

Teuber

applying a similar technique in cases with penetrating

’brain,wounds, concluded that performance was unrelated to locus of lesion
but that aphasic patients

made

significantly more errors than a non-

aphasic brain-injured group.

Pollack gt §l3(12), using the identical

in this study, reported

relationship between perceptual errors

as

no

test
and

the location of lesion in tumor patients. They reported, instead, that

defective perception

related to the severity of other rental changes,

was

‘

such as

It

disorientation.
Should'be pointed out that the

all patients referred for
to that found by Pollack

ECT

was 10.35

total pretreatment

cit.,

Teuber and Weinstein, op.

12.

Pbllack, Battersby and Bender, op.

13.

Ibid.

score for

errors, a score almost identical

gt §l5(13) in theﬁ‘brain

11.

mean

369-379.

cit.

tumor

patients. Since

�the two populations are comparable in terms of other parameters as age
The

and education.

defects in figure ground discrimination cannot

be

’regarded as reflective of cerebral dysfunction as an isolated entity

abstracted from the totality of behavior. Rather than being in a
to one relationship, poor performance on such tasks

interaction of

many

there are

cases with cerebral

many

may

be due

to the

factors, brain dysfunction; being only one.
not

damage who do

show

one

Thus

defects.

Con-

versely, the present findings indicate that the inability to perceive
embedded

as

it is
The

figures

may be

related as

much

to certain types of mental illness

to brain disease.

!

relationship of perceptual alteration to behavioral

is clearly demonstrated.

treatment

The

patients

increase in errors during treatment were those
pronounced change

in clinical behavior.

who showed

also

who

change during

the greatest

showed

the most

They manifested such behavior

patterns as euphoria, hypomania, withdrawal, somatization or paranoia.
Comparable to these are the
embedded

figures test during treatment.

related to
paranoid
was

qualitative aspects of performance

an evasion

The

some

may

as well be

was

cases, and to a

lack of concern in correcting errors

associated with clinical patterns of euphoria

increase in errors

the

Failure to attempt the task

or withdrawal reaction in

hostility in orders.

on

attributed to

and hypomania.

change

The

in motivation or

attitude toward the task or examiner as it is to any Specific aSpect of
the altered brain function. Changes in performance on this complex perceptual task can thus be understood as

one

manifestation of changes in

the patterns of interaction with the environment.
The

relation between behavioral

this type of task, has been noted

and perceptual

by Witkin to be

patterns, using

true of persons without

9

�-11..

demonstrable cerebral dysfunction as well.

He

individual differences in the perception of

embedded

be

related to personality factors (15).

The

found

that the

wide

figures (1h)

may

finding in the present

study of the prognostic significance of the pretreatment score to the

eventual physiological reaponse is in accord with his observations.
7

Personality factors

may

thus be related to the degree of changes in
In a previous study (16) certain person-

brain function.with trauma.

ality patterns

were associated with the

ment following ECT.

short term behavioral improve-

basic characteristics of persons with a
favorable prognosis defined in that study were an inability to think

critically

The

or sensitively about

their

own

or other's needs or feelings,

patterns characterized by oversimplified generalizations,
,stereotypy and conventionality. The present data that persons with
greater difficulty in making the necessary analysis and figure-ground
and response

discriminations

on embedded

figures

show a

greater alteration in behavior

with treatment, is consistent with the previous observations.

Witkin,.Individual differences in case of perception of
figures, J. Pers., 19: 1950, 1-15.
15. H. A. Witkin, Nature and importance of individual differences
in perception, J. Pers., 18, l9h9, 1&amp;5-170.
1h.

16.

H. A.

embedded

Kahn and Fink, op.

cit.

�.12Summary and Conclusion:

1. Fifty-three consecutive patients referred for electrotherapy
were studied before and
embedded geometric

after treatment

figures.

An

on

their ability to perceive

experimental group of

29

patients

received

A.
regular grand mal therapy wiﬂa pentothal premedication.
control group of 2h patients received subconvulsive stimulation only.

2.

The

experimental group

made

significantly more errors following

treatment than did the controls.
I

3. 'Within the experimental group, however, there was considerable
I

variability. Increase in errors

was found

to

be

significantly related

to the degree of altered brain function, and the degree of behavioral
change.

h.

The

pretreatment error scores were significantly related to the

degree of altered brain function developed during treatment. The significance

in terms of personality factors is indicated.
5. Performance in this complex visual task mirrors the pattern of

of this

behavioral change observed clinically.
6.
one

It is

concluded

that performance

on a complex

visual task is

manifestation of a generalized pattern of interaction with the environ-

ment.

,4
Lu...

�.13-

Legend

Illustrations of test figures.

Fig. 1.

used to acquaint the subjects with the task
the task

is

The

is

preliminary sample
shown

in a. In

d

complicated by having the subject determine which of

the two simple figures can be found in the complex figure.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2514">
                <text>Perception of embedded figures after induced altered brain function. American Psychologist, 12: 36, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2515">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2516">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-24-029</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2517">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2518">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2519">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2520">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2521">
                <text>[preprint].</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2522">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2523">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74454">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81015">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87576">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94137">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="236" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="27">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/cda4311bdad6b67d755b69d80816976c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2b63fbc4853cb463227378ec92424d29</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100653">
                    <text>[Reprinted from THE

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, Vol. 117, No. 1,

Jan. 1953]

PERCEPTION OF SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI
BY MENTALLY DEFECTIVE SUB]ECTS*1'
MAX FINK, M.D.;t

MARTIN A. GREEN, M.D.§
AND

MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
In studiesof the perception of two tactile stimuli applied simultaneously, it has been demonstrated that patients with diffuse brain
dysfunction make errors. They persist in making errors either in re—
porting only one of the stimuli (extinction) or in mislocalizing one or
both stimuli (displacement). When errors are made in simultaneous
stimulation of face and hand (the face—hand test) (I), the errors are
in the recognition of the stimulus applied to the hand. The percept in
the cheek is correctly reported. This “face-dominance” is apparent on
initial test trials of normal adults. Similar results have been obtained
in tests of young children.
Children under the age of six years respond to simultaneous tactile
tests almost with the same frequency of errors as do patients with dif—
use brain dysfunction. With these facts before us, it soon became ap—
parent that mental age was a factor in the perceptual response. There—
fore, a study of the responses of mentally retarded adults with mental
ages of young children was undertaken. Simultaneous tactile tests were
applied to a group of mentally defective patients, and three aspects
were studied: their responses to the tests; the order of dominance; and
the relation, if any, to standard psychometric tests.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD

Fifty—seven mentally retarded adults from the wards of

Letchworth
Village, New York were examined. They ranged in chronological age
from 13 to 41, and in mental age from two years, six months to nine
‘From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College
of Medicine and the Neurologic Service of Bellevue and the Mount Sinai Hospital,

New York.
fRead before the Seventh Annual Convention and Scientiﬁc Program, Society of
Biological Psychiatry, Atlantic City, May 11, 1952.
IThis work aided in part by a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis.
§Post—Doctorate Fellowship, United States Public Health Service. Work aided, in
part, by a Grand—in—Aid #MH-139 from the United State Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health.

[43]

�Max Fink, Martin A. Green, and Morris B. Bender

44

years, eight months. The ﬁgures for mental ages were those recorded
in hospital records reflecting performance on Stanford—Binet tests; and
in each instance, the most recent estimate was used.

RESPONSES TO SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE TESTS
ON INITIAL AND SUBsEQUENT TRIALS
FACE-HAND TEST
100
odul‘l’s wifh orqanic
------------ .. mental sqndrome

0O
RESPONSES

oO
\l O

DOMINANT

01

O

a!

O

adult-mentally
defective

§O
FACE

PERCENT

N0!

00

..

0

0O

2

3

4

adult-normal
5

6

7

TRIAL NUMBER

8

9

10

showing responses to simultaneous tactile tests on initial and subsequent trials of the face-hand test in adults with organic mental syndrome, normal
children of three to six years, mentally defective adults, and normal adults.
FIG. I.—-Graph

The subject was asked to close his eyes. Following this, he was
simultaneously touched on the right cheek and the dorsum of the
left hand. The examiner asked: “What did you feel?” If there was no
response, the examiner said “Did you feel me touch you” and “Point
to the place Where I touched you.” After this test the subject was again
asked to close his eyes and the left cheek and left hand were stimu—
lated, and the reports recorded. Subsequent tests included stimulation
of left cheek and right hand, right cheek and hand, both cheeks, and
both hands. This sequence of six trials was then repeated so that a
total of 12 tests involving the cheek and hand combinations were

carried out.
Subsequently, tests of other body parts, as hand—foot, cheek—shoulder,
thigh—foot, shoulder—thigh, cheek—foot, and shoulder—hand were intro—
duced—four trials of each asymmetric combination and one trial each
of the symmetric body parts. The entire sequence of tactile tests was
completed with a repetition of trials of the face-hand test.

�Perception of Tactile Stimuli by Mental Patient:

45

RESULTS

On the initial trial, 98 percent of mentally retarded subjects reported the stimuli incorrectly. Eighty percent reported the face percept
only, omitting the percept to the hand, a type of sensory extinctionﬁ“
The remainder localized the face percept correctly, but mislocalized
the second percept to the opposite check, a type of
sensory displace—
ment. No subjects reported the stimulus to the hand alone or mislocalized the cheek stimulus to the hand. These
responses are expressions of “face dominance.”
Face dominance was also apparent on subsequent trials of the facehand test. Fifty percent of the subjects failed to localize the two stimuli
correctly during the ﬁrst ten trials. They repeatedly failed to report
the hand stimulus or repeatedly mislocalized it. The phenomenon of
extinction was manifest in all subjects; while in 46 percent, displace—
ment of percepts were also reported. A smaller number (38 percent)
showed perseveration of responses, i.e., reported previous stimuli even
though new stimuli had been applied to different parts of the body.
The phenomenon of allesthesia (mislocalization of a stimulus across
the midline to the opposite side of the body) (2) was occasionally
observed. Only one patient demonstrated exosomesthesia (the displacement into extrapersonal space) (3).
Half of the subjects succeeded in localizing and identifying the two
stimuli during the initial ten trials. Their ability to localize the stimuli
in the face—hand tests was carried over in the subsequent testing of
other body parts. A few subjects, however, after correctly identifying
the stimuli of the face-hand tests, made occasional errors during the
testing of other body parts. These errors were almost exclusively in a
failure to report one of the stimuli; neither displacement or
perservera—
tion was manifest.
In all subjects simultaneous stimulation of homologous regions,
e.g.,
cheek-cheek, or hand—hand, were interspersed throughout the testing.
Errors were infrequent on such tests, even in those subjects who made
persistent errors on stimulation of asymmetric regions, e.g., cheekhand. Such errors were observed in 15 subjects (26 percent) but only
on occasions were the errors in a pattern as seen in a patient with a
hemisensory syndrome due to a focal cerebral lesion.
Relation to Mental Age—There was a deﬁnite relation between
the incidence of persistent errors and the mental
age of the subjects.
Table I presents subjects grouped according to mental age (as determined by standard Stanford—Binet testing) and their responses to
simultaneous tactile tests. It will be noted that there is a gradual fall

*For convenience in writing we will call this type of response under conditions of
double simultaneous stimulation extinction.

�Max Fink, Martin A. Green, and Morris B. Bender

46

in the incidence of persistent errors on simultaneous tactile tests as
mental age increases.
TABLE
Mental Age Group
(year—month)

I

No. of
Subjects

Persistent
Errors

By 10 Trials

10
10
10
12

10

0

2-6 to 3—11
4—0 to 4—11
5—0 to 5—11
6—0 to 6—11
7—0 to 7—11
8—0 to 9-6

Correct

7

3
6

4
5
2

11

4

7

9
3

1

Relation of Body Parts—During the initial ten trials, face dominance was manifest in all subjects. In the subsequent tests of other
body parts, additional patterns of “dominance” appeared. This was
represented in the subject’s inability to identify and localize one of the
stimuli or to mislocalize one percept in the direction of the second
stimulus. As already intimated previously, the locus of the stimulus
which is correctly reported is said to be “dominant.” In tests of cheek
and shoulder, and cheek and foot, face dominance was observed (Table
II). In tests of foot and hand, and shoulder and hand, both foot and
shoulder are dominant over the hand. In the relationship of thigh and
foot, and shoulder and thigh, both foot and shoulder are dominant over
the thigh.
TABLE

II.——RESPONSES ON MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE
57 MENTALLY DEFECTIVE SUBJECTS

Total No.
of Tests in
All Patients

TESTS IN

.M
Body Combination”

FACE—hand
FACE—foot

576
163

FACE-Shoulder

184

SHOULDER—thigh

170

SHOULDER-hand

151

FOOT—thigh

170

FOOT—hand

231

Incorrect
Responses

Correct

Responses

face

or hand

face and hand

face

or

foot

face and foot

315

36

face
64

9

9

or shoulder
15

252

128

face and shoulder
105

shoulder or thigh

shoulder and thigh

shoulder or hand

shoulder and hand

45

12

63

3

foot
42

foot
58

or thigh
1

7

or hand
33

113
85

foot and thigh
11 1

foot and hand
140

*Capitalized letters (under Body Combination) indicate dominant part as
manifest by t—test value of 5 percent or less.
The differences in the incidence of errors in diﬂ’erent body combinations are
largely due to the order of testing and the factor of learning.

�Perception of Tactile Stimuli by Mental Patients

47

DISCUSSION

These results when compared with those obtained in previous ex—
periments show that there is a striking similarity in the performances
of patients with organic mental syndrome due to diffuse cerebral disease or dysfunction (4a), to normal children below the age of seven
years and to mental defective adults with a low mental age. The
similarity lies in the types of responses, the persistence of errors, and
in the order of dominance.
Extinction and displacement phenomena are frequent in all three
groups. The responses are apparent on the initial and on subsequent
trials. In addition, allesthesia and exosomesthesia are occasionally ob;
served.
The subjects in each group manifest an inability to identify and
localize asymmetric stimuli, that is, cheek and hand. Symmetric Stimuli,
however, as stimuli applied to both hands, are well localized, even by
the most mentally retarded subjects, by patients with severe brain dvsfunction, and by the youngest normal child.
In every group the errors of localization persist through many trials
of simultaneous tactile tests. The subjects are unable to localize the
two Stimuli despite verbal clues offered by the examiner, such as asking
whether there had been another Stimulus. The errors are present even
when the subjects are tested with eyes open. The persistence of errors
on repeated trials in the mentally deﬁcient adult, in the patients with
mental changes, and in normal young children is in marked contrast
to the ease with which normal adults correctly localize and identify
the stimuli. The performances of these subjects are illustrated in the
graph (Fig. I) which compares the percentage of errors during the
initial ten trials of the face-hand test. It should be noted that the curve
for the mentally defective adults includes 15 subjects who have a men—
tal age of seven or more years (Table I). This will account for the
curve being below that of normal children whose average mental age
was rarely above seven years.
Furthermore, the order of dominance observed in mentally re—
tarded subjects is similar to that reported for patients with organic
mental changes (4b). Face dominance is seen in all subjects, while the
hand dominance is hardly manifest. The other body parts are between
these limits.
As in patients with organic mental changes or very young children
one may be inclined to explain the inability of the retarded adults to
localize the two Stimuli as due to “confusion” or “inattention.” Such
an explanation is unwarranted because these subjects can perceive and
localize symmetric Stimuli and the errors are not haphazard. The

�48

Max Fink, Martin A. Green, and Morris B. Bender

errors show in a pattern so that almost all errors are in stimuli to the
hand and none in stimuli to the face. Furthermore, this pattern persists in tests of other body areas and is similar to patterns described for
other groups of subjects (5).
A comparison of the observations in normal young children and
in the mentally retarded adults reveals a striking similarity in perform—
ances when the mental ages of each group are compared. In both
groups, there is a change in performance about the mental age of six
years. It may be concluded that the face-hand test reﬂects the same
performance ability as the Stanford—Binet test. The face—hand test has
validity as a convenient approximation of performance above and
below a mental age of seven years.
SUMMARY

The face—hand test and simultaneous tactile tests of other body
parts were applied to 57 mentally defective adults. Their chronologic
ages ranged from 13 to 41 years and their mental ages as determined
by Stanford—Binet testing ranged from two years, six months to nine
years, eight months.
On the initial trial 98 percent failed to localize both stimuli and on
subsequent trials 50 percent made persistent errors beyond the tenth
trial. The errors were made in stimuli to the hand whereas stimuli to
the face were correctly reported. Extinction, displacement, allesthesia,
and exosomesthesia were observed. These performances of the mentally defective adult to the face-hand test are strikingly similar to the
responses of patients with diffuse brain disease and of normal children

of six years or less.
Furthermore, there is a deﬁnite relation between the persistence
of errors and the mental age of the subject. It is concluded that the
face—hand test reﬂects the same performance as the Stanford—Binet and
has validity as an approximation of performance above and below the
mental age of seven years.
REFERENCES
Bender, M. B., Fink, M. and Green, M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests
of face and hand. Arch. Neural. &amp;' P5ycl1iat., 66: 355, Sept. 1951.
2. Bender, M. B. and Nathanson, M.: Patterns in allesthesia and their relation to
disorder of body scheme and other sensory phenomena. Arch. Neural. 6' P5yc/zz'at.,
64: 501, October, 1950.
3. Shapiro, M. F., Fink, M. and Bender, M. B.: Exosomesthesia or the phenomenon
of displacement into extra—personal space. Arc/2. Neural. é‘r Psychiat. (in press).
4. (a) Pink, M., Green, M. and Bender, M. B.: The face—hand test as a diagnostic
sign of organic mental syndrome. Neurology, 2: 46, Jan. 1952.
1.

�Patients
Mental
Stimuli
by
Tactile
of
Perception

49

in
cutaneous
dominance
of
order
The
B.:
M.
and
Bender,
M.
M.,
Fink,
(b) Green,
perception. Trans. Amer. Neural. Assam, 74: 1952.
in
Extinction
phenomena
W.:
A.
and
Schappell,
F.
M.
5. Bender, M. B., Shapiro,
hemiplegia. Arch. Neurol. 6' Psychiat., 62: 717, Dec., 1949.

1150 PARK AVE,
NEW YORK 28, N. Y.

�~

a!"

hfmaulfﬁﬁg

PIIOI?IIOI

I!

0'

SIIULRAIIOUB

3-

_

«-

$555!”?
‘

“my“, 1.; -A?»

if}

iﬂcllhl ITIIULI

IIIIALEY 931301173 BUBJIB!£.*
By

In: vink, 3.»...
Ina-tin

A. Green.

_

8.3..”

and

ﬂorria

B. Bondar,

u.n.

«mach-r

r“

3'" a”
on
Collegp or undicina and tho Neurolozze service of null-vac
nouns Sinai Hospital, low York city.
‘.

.

9*!h1u vnrk aidod

a

1'

in part

for Infantilc Paralyuin.

"M";

by a

"‘"‘

"

J,

73‘;

"u f

and tho

Ftllauuhsp from the latiennl ronnunt1an
.

aﬁtPott-Dootortte Fellaunhip, Unitcd States Public ﬁbulth surviec.
Hark aided, in part. by n Grantuinind #HH~139 from the United
3t&amp;to Public ahalth Servico. National Inatitutas'ot ﬁnnlth.

�1.

In etudiee or the peroeption of

two

teetile stimuli applied

eieoiteheoueiy, it hee been denohetreted that petiente with
diffuee brain dysfunction Ink! errors. Qhey pereilt in liking.
errore either in reporting only one or the etinnii (extihetioh)
or in nielooeiieihc one or both etiwnii (diepleeeleht). when
error: ere eede in ei-aiteneoue stimulation or face and head (the
teoe~hend test) (1) the errore ere in the reoocnitidn or the
etiluiue eppiied to the head. it. peroept in the cheek it
correctly reported. This “reoe—deninanoe” ie eppereht on initial
tent triele of aerial edulte. Siniier reeuite have been obteihed
in teete or youn‘ children.
children under the ene or six yeere reepond to ei-nlteheoue
tactile teete eieoet with the eene treeuehoy or errore ee do
patients with diffuhe brain dylfunotion. Uith thete flute before’
on, it eoon beoene apperent thet eentei esp wee e rector in the
peroeptuei reepohee. Therefore. e study or the reeponeee or
mentally retarded eduite with mental egee or young children wee
underteken. aieoiteheoue teotiie teete were eppiied to e group or
mentally detective petiente. end three eepeote were studied: their
reepoheee to the tests; the order or doeinenee: end the reletion,
it eny. to standard peyohdletrio teete.

am no me neateily
on!

Pitty~eeven

reterded eduite from the werde or

Letohworth Viilege, lew York were examined. whey ranged in chronologioei ego from 13 to #1. end in wentei use from two yeereueix
nonthe to nine veers-eight nohthe. The figuree tor'uehtei eaee were
thoee recorded in hoeoitei record: reflecting pertoreenoe on
stenrord~nihet teete; end ih.eeoh instance, themeoet recent eetinete

“I “I'd

e

�its

subsoot sss'ssksd to class his oyss. Following this
ho sss sinultsnsously touched on tho right ohsok sod tho dorsal
of tho loft hsno. rho oxsninor asked: ”tht did you tool?" If

thsro uss no response. tho oxssinor sskod "Did you tool as touoh
you'.snd-“?oint to the plans shore I touchsd you." Aftsr this
tsst the subjsot sss sgsin sokod to class his syss sod tho lsrt
ohssk.snd loft hsnd stisulotsd, sud tho rsports rooordsd.
subssQusnt

tssts inoludsd stmsulstion of lsrt

ohssk and right hsno,
right ohosk sud hsad, both chooks,snd both bonds. This ssquonoo

or six trials sss than rspsstsd so thst a totsl or 12 tssts
involving the chuck; Ind hand ounbinstions ssrs carried out.
Subsequsntly, tosts or other body ports, on hsod~root,
ohssk-shouldsr. thigh-toot, shouldsr-thigh. ohook~£oot, and
shouldorvhsnd sore introduced ~ four trials or osoh ssyulstrio
oosbinstion sad on: trisl esoh of tho symmetric body parts. tho
ontirs musnos or mum tssts
omlcm with s rspstition
or trisls of the tsoo~hsnd test.

m

assault:
0n

ths'initisl trisl,

98! of nontslly rotsrdod subjects

roportsd tho stinuli inoorrsotly. light: psr osnt rsportsd tbs
fsos porospt only, omitting the psroopt to ths hand, a typo or
ssnsory sxtiuotion.’ so. rssnindor looslissd tbs tsos psrospt
oorrsotly, but mislooslisod tho second poroopt to tbs opposits
chock, s type of sensory displsosssnt. It subJsots roportsd tbs
stimulus to tbs hand olom or nialoosliud musk stimulus to the

Fla'Ior doﬁ§3nisnos in writing so will osll this

typo or rssponso

undsr conditions or double simultaneous stimulation as extinction.
RID

Pl;

�3._

are unprbtnionn or “race dunintnoa."
tact dulinnnn- an: also apparent on subuognlat triuln of
rib: flacuhnnd tent. titty per cent at eh. handouts failed to
lootliue the two stimuli oorrtetly during the firﬂt ten trillu.
1hr! rupoatediy thilod to vaport tn. hand atinulun or repoatedly
nialoetlized it. 15h: phenomenan at extinction was manifest in all
lubaoatsg while in forty~six per cont, displuocunnt or poroupta
I've alto reportad. A smaller number (335) shorad perceverutien
or runponlon; i.e.,_ri§;r§od previous stiuuli even though now
stimuli had hc¢n~aapli¢d ta different part: of thn hady. The
phenomenon of cilanthnniu (miulooalisntian of a stimulus across
th. nialinn to the opposite 3140 at tho body) (3) was ooaaaiannlly
obnorved. Only out phtiant dauonutrltod oxotaneutheuia (the
dinplaooaonz into extra-pornonnl npaeo) (3).
all! or the number or nubjoota uncooeaed in localising and
identifying the two stimuli Grins the initial ton trinlu. Their
nhility to 1033113. the Itimuli in tho thee—hand tents una carried
over in thn auhnoquont testing or other body parts. A for Inbaoetn,
amour, actor aomctly identifying m5. sen-mu at the hem-hand
haiku. made oaacaiennl errata during the testing or other body parts.
ihole errors ﬂute tlnmut again-ivoly in a failure to roport one ork‘
the stimuli . mum displacement of ”mat-tum Ion unite“.
In all subject. sinultanoaul Itiunlation or hauologoun ii
rngienl. 0.5. aher-ohnck, or hand*hnnd. wort intoruporled
throughout the touting. 3mm mm infrequent on men tutu, «ms
in those subject: who and. periisuont error. on neinulction at
hand.

Ehunu annponnou

asymmetric regions,

0.3. chairman.

fifteen subjects (26!) but only

Mowers were chums!

on occasions ware

in

thc error: in a

�#.

pattern as toga in

t pttiont

with n honiuoanory syndrnna dun ta 3

tonal cornbral Ionian.
Relation to at."

definite relation betunen thu 1nc1denoo or perintent 0mm and thc maul m or the subarea. run- I mount.
.ubjootnerupod acaardins to nantul net (at dateruined by utcndard
There wan a

Stanfordwauant to:t1ns) and their respanaoa to ainultannaua tactile
be noted that there in sauna;
in the
tutu.” It

an

insidonon or porozatcnt errors.on Innultnnaou:

unul m 1mnnﬁn.
mam.

m am

m;

an

tactilo test.

an

th-

"$33“

$233.1.

1o

0

14:

7

3

93313:“

f

(yrnrdnanthn)

to 3-11
Mo to Mn
5-0 to 5~11

10
10

I

5

6.0 ta 6~11
1-0 to 7.41

12

5

7

11

a

9

8-0 to 9-6‘

I

1

3

2-»6

‘

nolntion of 3352 Pitts! During the initinl ton trials, faae daninnan.
was manifest in 311 lubjoata. In the subsequent tent: or ather body
parka. ndditionnl pattcrnn of "dominance” appeared. This wt:
ruprnutnzod 1n the aubjeot's inability to identity and localize on.
of an. utiuuli or to niulooalitn on: poroept in an. dirlotion or thﬁ
Ionand Itinulua.' As already intimated previoutly eh: Lyon: 0: the
stimulus which in correctly reported 1: natd ta be ”daminanc". In

tent: at

check and shoulder. and cheek and

fact, face

dominance was

�5’

obcurvod (Elblc

II). In toot:

both root and thauldcr

at tnxgn

It.

to tho hand. in.tho rulatzonnh39
thigh. both too: and shoulder are

dominant
and shoulder and

root,
daninnnt to tho thigh.
and

or toot and hind. and shoulder and hand.

‘

BL! 11

alsronsna

O! NHLEIPLE 81IULEARIGUS 2ACTILI TESTS
BBFIGEIVI sunqsces

retal
£25: 6nnb1nnt10n'

lumber
of Toot. in

Incorrect

All Patient:

lACI~hnnd

576

'Acl»foot

163

{AGE-shoulder

184

‘

8300LDIR~thigh

170

alonlﬂll¢hnnd

151

Factuthigh

170

toetuhnnd

231

I!

57

NBNEALLY

Carroct

Duo.
315

or

Rand

Rosaenaou
Paco 1nd Band

Fan.

or

loot

taco and root

Faee

or Shouldor

Rougonaol

36

252

9

128

9

Face and Shoulder
105

15

shoulder and Thigh

shouldcr or

ﬁnish

Shouldcr or

Hand
3

Shouldgg and 33nd

#5
63

12

‘

113

Font

or

fhigh

root and Thigh

Foot

ar

Hand

Foot and 81nd

#2

»

(under Body cambination)

letterI/indtoatc dominant part
*g;pltalilod
63‘ 10.3

17

33

111

1&amp;0

as manxregt by t~toae va1ue of

differenaei in tho incidence of errors in airfarent body combination:
is largely duo to the order of talking and the factor or lcarning.

Ema

I

../

�6,
amacuggxggg

inane reunite when compared with thoae attained in previous
experiments then that there in e striking similarity in the per-

patient: with organic mental

tn diffuee
cerebral disease or dysfunction (23). normal children below the
use of seven yeere end mental defective adults with e low mental
age. The similarity lien in.the type: of reapeneee. the pernietenee
5: errors, and in the order of dominance.
Extinction end diepleeenent phenanenn are frequent in all
three groupe. Ibo responses are apparent on the initial end an
Isabeeeuent triele. In addition, allettheeia and exonemeetheeie are
formeneee of

syndrome due

I

oeellioneily obeerved..

the eubJeote in each group unifeet an inability to identity
Ind leeelile lay-nettle stimuli. thet is, cheek and hand. Symmetrie
ntinnii. however, at etinuli applied to both hands, are well

the most nanny named subjects. by patients
with very severe brain dysfunction and by the younspnt annual child.
In every group the errors or localizatien persist through
many trial. of simultaneous teetiie tests. The subject: are unable
ta lonelise the two Itinuli despite verbal clues uttered by the
whether there had mu another etinuiuu.
owner. each
The errors are present even when the subjects are tented with eyes
upon. The pertietenee of error: on repeated trial: in the mentally
deficient eéuit, in the patient: with mental chance: and in annual
young children it in marked contrast to the ease with which harnei
adults correctly iooeiise and identify the stimuli. The per~
tornnneee or these tubaecte are illustrated in the graph which

ieeeiised, even

by

u mam

_

�7:.
compare.

their our cent error: during the initial ton trials

of

It

Ihould be noted that the curve for the
nontally deroctivo adult. includes 15-Iub1003! who have a mental
age or 7 or more yuart, (see~!able I). rhia will account for,
tho curve being below that or honnal children whose average mental
tho race-hand tout.

age was

rarely above-7 yearn.

Further-coo, tho order or conihahce observed in aoutally
rotardcd subjects ia similar to that reported for pationta with
organic nohtal chahuoa (at). Pace dominance in poem in all
aubjeota, while thh hind dominance la hardly annifeat. The other
body part. are tetuecn theaa linita.
A: in patientc with organic tental chancea'or very young
children one nay be inclined to explain the inability or the
retarded adults to localine the two utiauli aa due to ”confusion”
or "inattention." such an explanation in unnarranhcd hecanaa these
subject. can perceive and localite Ion-atria Itinnli and the errata
are not haphaaard. The errors shoe in a pattern to that clncut all
emu are in stimuli to the hand and none in stimuli to the race.
rurtheraore, this pattern per-iota in tecta or other body areaa

la similar to patterns daaoribod for other group: of athects (2).
A comparison of the ohcervaticna in normal young children
and in tho mentally retarded adult. reveal: a striking ainilarity
in perforntnoet than the mental age: or each group are oomparcd. In
both groupa, there in a chahgc in pcrtor-ahcc about tho mental age
or six soars. It may be concluded that the race-hand teat reflecta
and

the same performance ability an the stanrood~nihot tent. tho
race~hahd tent has validity ac a convenient approxmuation at per»
formance above and below a mental age of seven yearn.

�8.

tout and tinnitunnnu: tactila tact. or nth-r body
part: unto Ipplioa to 57 noatnlly narcotivc adults. Qatar
chronological asst runcpd from.13 to #1 start and taut: anntal
yourn-é month.
1303 as dotcrldnld by stanrord~nanot touting rangpd Iran a
The facauhnnd

,to 9 yearauﬁnonthlp

Eris} 9&amp;§.tlilod to 1903118. both act-“11
and an oubuogupne grin}: 50! and. persistent error. hoynnd can
0n

tbs

131%151

trial. 1h. errors ﬂit! lid. in Itlluli to en. hind whovotl
'auumu so. the has am ”metal: "parka. ‘xxtmouon, dinpnomnt,
touch

.

allalﬁhosia and oerquIthnuin wort obocrvod. ihnlo parrot-anac0: tbs Inntally detoetivo'aault to an; tacoohand tent at. utrakxngly
similar tn the response: of puttcntn with dztruto brain agnonua and
of normal children I59 :1: 13:23 or loan.
rurthnmnaao, thorn in a dotinihn rclation botuoon tho p02—
uittcnno of utter: and tbs anneal as. at tho aubJoot. It 1: con~
gludnd thnt tn. floc-hnnd touﬁ rotloots ch. sane pgttarllnno as tho
senatord~31unt and has validity as tumgpprnximntion or performance
V

above and below

tn. acntal an!

or seven yours.

�mung

9.
‘

3.3., rm, I. and «am, Ila rue-m 1n nonunion
mm.
1n nimltmeouo tent: or race and hand. ArchJomlJnnzohnt.

1.

ﬁg, 355-352.

809%... 1951.

14., am, II. and mm, mm: The raeomand tut u
an,
a. diagnostic up) or organic mental undress. Inna-019g, g;

‘6“58;

m,

JW
ll... um, I.

1952'

and

cutaneous perception.

m,
Mn..mx-.lourol.unoou
H.3J

The

-

order of

in
denim
195:.

7k:

11.3. and summon, HA utter-nu 1n alluthuu
mm,
than relation to diaerdor or body when and 0th»

and

unset-i 950.
gs: 501615, October,
SEAPIRO, ILL, 21m, 14. and mum, 14.8.: nouns-thou: or
the plum-anon of dilpllomnt into ours—personal snot.
phenomena.

Atheurothghiut. ,

Archmoumhhrqrohut. (in

m, ILL,

.5.

December, 1919.

)

Vi crib ./
7

{(12%

3!!“‘130,

NJ.

{aha-noun. 1:: 11031910311.

'

pan)

and WRAPPELL, AMA

Minot“!!!

Arch.murol.&amp;Pazch1at.. ﬁg; 717-3724.

�1%
1139:. 1.

Graph gnawing runponnou

tugs:

ta ninultuniaua tantilo

on in1t1a1 5nd subocquant

trials

of tho
in adults with organic mental

faoe‘hand test
‘ayndrunn. normal children. age 3~6 yonrt.

mantally defective adults and normal adults.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2354">
                <text>Perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli by mentally defective subjects. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1953 Jan; 117(1): 43-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2355">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2356">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-9-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2357">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2358">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin A.; Bender, Morris B.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2359">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2360">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2361">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, Vol. 117, No.1, Jan.1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2362">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2363">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74438">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80999">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87560">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94121">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="235" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="26">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/a1c70b872beb13c5b56dba9ecef3099b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>de32dee2acdbbfa2e67eb3cd0c31e52d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100652">
                    <text>Simultaneous
of
Perception
Tactile Stimuli in Normal Children
Max Fin/z, M.D. and Morris B. Bender, M.D.

Normal adults readily identify and localize tactile stimuli applied simultaneously to the face and the hand (the “face-hand test”).1 While half the
subjects perceive stimuli incorrectly on the initial trial, all are accurate by
the tenth trial of the test. Young children, however, ﬁnd the task of identiﬁcation and localization of two skin stimulations difﬁcult. They report only
one of the two stimuli, or, if they report the two, frequently mislocalize one
of them. The omission or mislocalization of stimuli is not haphazard but follows a consistent pattern in which stimuli to the face are readily appreciated
(“most dominant”) while those to the hand are not (“least dominant”).
In order to determine the pattern of “dominance” in children and the age
at which such tactile perceptual tasks are correctly performed, a study of
normal children was undertaken. The responses of children to the face-hand
test and to simultaneous tactile tests of other body parts were ascertained.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD

Three hundred normal children between the ages of three and 15 were
examined. They were from a neighborhood child care center, from the wards
and clinics of Bellevue Hospital, and children of neighbors and friends. They
were without manifest disorder of the nervous system. A few children at
two and a half years of age were included in the three year age group, but
younger children were generally not able to comprehend the test.
The subjects were examined individually, but there were many who were
examined in a day-room in full view of other children. The child was engaged
in play and when toys were available they were used to gain his confidence
and interest. At some time during play, the face-hand test was introduced.
From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of
Medicine and the Bellevue Hospital, New
York City.
This work was aided in part by a fellowship
grant from the National Foundation for In-

fantile Paralysis, and by a grant-in—aid from
the Coordinating Council for Cerebral Palsy
in New York City, Inc.
Read at the fourth annual meeting of the
American Academy of Neurology, Louisville, Kentucky, April 24, 1952.
27

Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, January, 1953, Vol. 3, No.

1

�28

NE UROLOGY

For the face—hand test, the child was told: “I (examiner) am going to
touch you,” and he was to “touch the same place I touch.” He was asked to
close his eyes. The examiner, with the ﬁngers, then touched simultaneously
a cheek and the dorsum of the contralateral hand of the subject. The child
was asked what he felt, and to point to the sites stimulated. After this response, the child was asked to close his eyes again, and now the opposite
cheek and hand were similarly stimulated and the report recorded. If only
one response was given to this trial, the child was asked if there had been
another stimulus anywhere else.
Following these two trials, the cheek and hand on the same side of the body
were tested in a similar fashion. The ﬁfth and sixth trials were not of asymmetric body parts but simultaneous stimulation of both cheeks or both hands.
The following various types of stimulation were used: heterologous stimula—
tion of asymmetric body parts on opposite sides, as right cheek and left hand;
homolateral stimulation of asymmetric body parts on the same side of the
body, as right cheek and right hand; and homologous stimulation of symmetric
body parts, as both cheeks or both hands. Such tests were repeated in each
child until at least ten trials were recorded. Subsequent tests of other body
parts, performed in a similar fashion, were introduced until at least 20 consecutive trials were observed in each subject.
A number of modiﬁcations had to be introduced for young children. Many
would not play the game with eyes closed, but insisted on keeping their eyes
open. In such cases the tests were applied with eyes open. Also, a large number of three and four year old children insisted on pointing to the examiner’s
hands and face on the initial trials. For these children, a few trials of single
touch stimuli applied to the thigh, chest or hand were introduced, until they
grasped the concept of pointing to their own bodies after the stimulation.
These single trials were carried out with eyes open.
After the series of double simultaneous stimulation tests were completed,
single stimuli were applied to various body parts to exclude from the normal
focal
difﬁculties.
with
subjects
any
sensory
group
The children were asked what they had felt and to point to the places
stimulated. Verbal reports of the locus of stimulation were not accepted. It
was occasionally noted that children would correctly name the parts stimulated, i. e., the cheek and hand, but then point to both cheeks, or to two places
on one cheek. It seemed as if naming the locus yielded more accurate responses than did pointing.
These tactile tests were repeated on consecutive days, or subsequently
after a lapse of a few days or weeks in some children. At such times, cutaneous stimuli other than light touch were added to the testing. These included
repetitive touch (rubbing), single pin prick, and repetitive pin pricks.
RESULTS

Incidence of errors: Young children made many errors on face-hand tests.
Eighty per cent of children under the age of six failed to localize both stimuli

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN
I00
m
2,

E

,_

9
II

m
p.

k

no:

m
at
“J
,—
uzJ

u

o:
to
u.

100

90

(“C9,

‘

80

85

70

L2

so

2

|

4

5

6

7

8

9

IO

I2

ll

.‘N‘K

‘

.

'\

x. _
__

“t“

c:
In
a.

3

'_

‘~~.

\._x_x_‘.

-

\K

3

0

\,\,.

-----------.‘

I‘.

E

20

‘

\

LA—

30

‘.

.-

8 so
c:
0 4o
o 30

40

‘-

60

o.

50

--------------

70

Z

60

\
'

90

r:

~-..

a

.
,_\.-___..‘

29

_

3
.........

.

YEARS

5 YEARS

7 YEA

S

.----I ~~~~~

o

.......... 9 YEARS

L345

NUMBER OF TRIAL

AGE
Graph 1.

Graph 2.

during the initial ten trials of the face—hand test; many of these even with
eyes open. In the older children the number of failures fell sharply (graph 1)
so that only 2 per cent of children in the 11 to 15 year age groups continued
to make errors after the initial ten trials. Apparently the ability to identify
two simultaneously applied tactile stimuli was directly related to the age of
the child. This ability was also related to the number of previous trials of the
face-hand test. In table 1 the trial of the test after which the child was consistently correct is recorded. The last column of the table includes all the
subjects who made errors in the ﬁrst ten trials, and on many trials of the test
beyond the tenth. Graph 2 illustrates this relation for selected age groups.
Type of testing: In these studies homolateral and heterologous stimulations
were carried out at random. Errors were made by subjects of all age groups
in tests of either type. Homologous tests, such as both cheeks, or both hands,
randomly interspersed in the testing after the fourth trial, elicited correct reof
this
served
clue
While
all
the older
to
in
as
a
some
cases.
nearly
sponses
TABLE

1

NUMBER OF TRIALS OF THE FACE-HAND TEST NECESSARY FOR PERSISTENT
CORRECT RESPONSES
(

Age
3

4
5
6
7
8

9
10

ll

12
13—15

Total Number
of Subjects
39
34
37
36
26
22
23
20
21
24
29

Touch Stimuli)

1

2

—

—

—

—

—

2

—

——

l

4

2

2
6
8
6

2
6 8
3 7
4 10

Trial Correct
3 4 5 6 7

l
l
1

l

6
3

4

5
2
4
6

—
——

3

2
2
—

5
4

l

6
4

l

8

9

—

2

1

—

2

—

l

—

—

—-

—

2
2
5

4

—

—

1

2

2

1

—

2
2
2

—

1

—

—

—

—

1

—

—

—

—

l

2

1

—

--

—

—

—

l

2

l

l
—

1

—
——

—

2

Errors Beyond
10 Trials
34
28
28
22

10
4
3
2
0
2
0

�30

NE UROLOGY

children that two stimuli were being applied, it did not seem to alter the
results in the younger children. In these subjects subsequent trials of the
face-hand test were incorrectly reported, even though the responses to the
symmetric stimuli had been correct. The perception of symmetric stimuli was
much better than asymmetric stimuli.
Subsequent testing: Of the total group of children studied, face—hand
tests were repeated at varying intervals subsequent to the initial testing in
40 children. Of the children under the age of six, subsequent testing elicited
the same difficulties with face—hand tests as was evident on the initial examination. In a few children over six years of age, who seemed to have grasped
the concept of two stimulations in the initial testing, errors were manifest on
subsequent days. It was as if many trials were necessary for successful learning of the task, and then, even though the task was successfully completed,
the learning was temporary. These observations are in contrast to those made
in normal adults, in whom subsequent testing did not elicit the errors of the
initial test.1
Type and pattern of responses: The errors (table 1) made by children on
repeated trials of the face-hand test were of six types: (a) a touch on the
cheek only, implying no perception in the hand; (b) a touch on each cheek,
implying a mislocalization of the stimulus applied to the hand; (0) a touch
on the cheek, and a second touch on the shoulder, neck or elbow, implying
a partial mislocalization of the stimulus applied to the hand; (d) a touch on
the hand only, implying no perception in the cheek; (e) a touch on each
hand implying a mislocalization of the cheek stimulus to the hand; and (f)
one or two touches on the examiner’s body, implying a mislocalization away
from the child’s body.
Face dominance (responses (I, b, c) was apparent in all age groups. It was
most manifest as extinction“ of the stimulus to the hand (response a), and
was seen in 62 per cent of the errors. Mislocalization of the hand stimulus to
the cheek (displacement) was observed in 31 per cent of the errors. While
most of the displacements were observed in tests involving cheek and hand
on opposite sides of the body, 7 per cent of the errors were displacements
from the hand to the cheek in the simultaneous stimulation of homolateral
body parts, e. g., right cheek and right hand. At such times the child pointed
to the cheek once, saying “a touch here,” and then, moving his ﬁngers 2 to 3
centimeters lower on the cheek, saying “and here.”
Other types of displacement were infrequent. There were partial displacements from the hand to the shoulder or neck. Mislocalization of a stimulus
across the midline of the body, known as allesthesia,3 was occasionally apparent in the stimulus to the hand on heterologous testing. Furthermore, children
*The failure to report one of two simultaneous stimulations has been called “extinction”
of a stimulus? The mislocalization of a percept to the homologous body part of the second
stimulus is called “displacement.” The mislocalization of a percept in the direction of the
second stimulus is called “partial displacement.” In each instance, the stimulus which is
correctly reported is said to be “dominant.”

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

31

under five years of age frequently mislocalized the initial stimulation away
from their body to parts of the examiner’s body or into space (response 7‘).
This phenomenon, known as exosomesthesia,4 persisted in some children despite repeated stimulations with the child’s eyes open, and despite the examiner’s insistence that it was the child who had been touched.
Another phenomenon was seen during homolateral testing. The child reported only the stimulus applied to the cheek. If the examiner asked insistently, “Did you feel another touch anywhere else?”, a number of children hesitatingly pointed to the symmetrical point in the Cheek on the opposite side
of the body. In order to determine whether this was a unique or a
systematic
phenomenon, tests of other body parts were carried out. In homolateral tests
of foot and hand, shoulder and hand, and cheek and foot, the same phenomenon was observed. The child first reported only the foot, the shoulder or
the cheek—and then, when the examiner insisted on a second locus, pointed
to the opposite foot, shoulder or side of the face.
Furthermore, in some young children the phenomenon appeared on single
stimulation. Single stimuli applied to any body part were localized correctly.
If the examiner then insisted that there had been a second stimulus, the child
pointed hesitatingly to the symmetric part on the opposite side of the body.
As already indicated, hand dominance (responses d and e) was infrequent.
It was observed in 7 per cent of the errors on face-hand tests. In all subjects
in whom it was apparent, subsequent trials of the face-hand test manifested
the pattern of face dominance.
Relation of hand and foot: In tests of parts of the body other than the face
and hand, the hand was always least dominant and the cheek the most. Simultaneous tests of foot and hand, the foot-hand test, were introduced after the
initial ten trials of the face-hand test in most children. In the foot-hand test,
foot dominance was apparent in 51 per cent of the responses (see table 2).
It was demonstrated by hand extinction, by displacement of hand stimuli to
the foot, and by partial displacement to the thigh, knee and leg.
TABLE 2
FOOT-HAND TEST
( Touch

Stimulation
Bilateral
Ipsilateral

Stimuli)

Total
Trials
53

48

Responses

Correct
21

23

Foot
17
16

Hand
1

3

F oot—
Foot
10
3

Partial
F t.—F t.
2
3

HandHand
2

O

Other stimuli: A small group of children who made errors in tests repeated
at varying intervals were examined with other cutaneous stimuli. Extinction
and displacement phenomena were present in face-hand tests using pin prick,
repetitive pin prick and repetitive touch (rubbing) stimulations. While the
number of errors with these stimuli were fewer than with touch stimuli, the

�32

NE UROLOGY

still
extinction
hand
of
and
dominance
face
was
apparent.
pattern
DISCUSSION

The ability to identify and localize simultaneous stimuli separated from
each other at some distance is a complex function which gradually develops
during the ﬁrst decade of life. It is a relatively unstable ability, for many
Focal
discriminations.
such
disturb
of
the
the
in
state
can
organism
changes
cerebral disease as in hemiplegia5 or parietal lobe lesions,2 spinal cord lesions,2
and diffuse brain diseases such as toxic states, senility and inﬂammatory conditions6 can so alter tactile discrimination that the phenomena of extinction
and displacement become prominent. Errors in simultaneous tactile tests are
the
of
the
trials
few
initial
the
test—during
adults
normal
in
during
apparent
period of learning.1 Persons subjected to large doses of barbiturates,6 electroshock therapy6 or anesthesia7 also manifest such inability.
A prominent feature in all groups is the uniformity of face dominance.
When discrimination of simultaneous stimuli is interfered with, for whatever
stimuli
the
in
hand
and
the
stimuli
not
the
made
to
in
the
are
errors
reason,
to the face. The corollary of “face dominance” is “hand extinction.” It, too,
is apparent in all subjects and under the variety of conditions studied. Furthermore, in an “order of dominance” other body parts are between these two
limits. Studies in patients with hemiplegia5 and patients with severe mental
of
dominance
order
revealed
have
disease6
of
brain
result
an
a
as
changes
of face-shoulder—trunk-thigh-foot and hand. Insofar as these other body parts
were studied in these children, a similar order was observed. Since dominance
is evident in young children, it appears that the pattern of dominance is an
inherent function of the organism. This childlike way of responding to simultaneous tactile stimuli is exposed and exaggerated in adults under a variety
of pathologic conditions.
these
of
dominance
rostral
to
explain
has
Cohn
a
theory
suggested
Recently
observations.8 Our observations are not in accord with such a theory. The
dominance of the foot to the hand in children, as well as the dominance of
with
of
series
hand
in
the
two
foot
and
to
patients
large
buttock,
thigh
penis,
diffuse brain dysfunctionfv9 make such an explanation untenable.
with
in
with
children
normal
in
ﬁndings
patients
of
ﬁndings
Comparison
those
with
children
in
the
On
mental
ﬁndings
comparing
syndrome:
organic
previously reported in patients with severe mental changes due to brain dysfunction,6 a close similarity in performance is observed. In both groups the
ability to discriminate simultaneous stimuli is limited. On non-homologous
tactile tests, such as the face—hand test, errors are made on initial and subdisis
the
of
stimulus
most
While
extinction
frequent
trials.
error,
a
sequent
with
a
and
children
both
In
errors
is
occur
patients,
common.
placement
done
be
stimuli.
of
Furthermore,
frequently
testing
cutaneous
may
variety
with eyes open, and in many instances with repeated verbal clues that there
is
of
factor
The
not prommade.
still
and
learning
are
stimuli,
errors
two
are
inent Since testing on subsequent days will elicit the previous patterned errors.

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

83

In Gestalt terms, patients with organic mental defects and children have difﬁ—
culty in extracting a complex sensory “ﬁgure” from the “background” of the
total sensory “ﬁeld.” Signiﬁcantly in each group there is no difﬁculty in identifying simultaneous stimuli if the stimuli are applied in symmetric regions
of the body, such as each hand or both sides of the face. Here, each stimulus
ﬁgure has a common background in terms of body image, namely the hand.10
Face dominance is apparent in both groups. It is manifest not only on
tests of face and hand but also on tests of face and other body parts. Also,
insofar as it was tested, the order of dominance for other body parts is similar.
While extinction and displacement are the most frequent types of error,
other phenomena are elicited in both children and patients. Partial displacements, e. g., the mislocalization of the percept from the hand to the shoulder
or neck on the face-hand test, are occasionally observed. The phenomena of
allesthesia and exosomesthesia are seen in the more severely affected patients
and in the youngest children; both are frequently associated in the same subjects. In allesthesia, the subjects usually localize the cheek stimulus correctly
but mislocalize the hand stimulus to the opposite hand or elbow, In exo—
somesthesia, the stimuli are mislocalized either to space in front of the subject
or to the examiner’s body. This phenomenon was frequent in the youngest
children, and despite the examiner’s urging that the child point to its own
body, the child persisted in such mislocalizations until a trial of the face-hand
test was performed with eyes open.
In addition to these phenomena which appear spontaneously, patients with
organic mental syndrome also manifest another response to simultaneous stimulation ﬁrst noted in children, i. e., on homolateral testing only one stimulus
(the cheek) is spontaneously reported; but when the examiner insists, the
second is mislocalized to the opposite cheek. Since the patients show so many
similarities to young children in their responses, it was predicted that they
would also show this phenomenon. In a series of patients with severe mental
changes, homolateral tests of the cheek, hand, foot, shoulder and thigh were
applied. When only one stimulus was reported, the examiner asked for the
locus of the second stimulus. Responses were obtained in 20
per cent of the
patients, and in each one the second stimulus was mislocalized to the symmetric body part. Furthermore, in some subjects the same phenomenon was
observed with single stimulation.
This phenomenon appears to be similar to the completion phenomenon
described in Gestalt literature as “closure” and “good continuation.” These
are usually described for other sensory modalities. When a circle is tachistoscopically exposed in the visual ﬁeld so that half falls on a hemianopic ﬁeld,
or if a cross is exposed so that the center falls in the blind spot, many subjects
report a complete circle or cross. This “completion” occurs for “good” ﬁgures.
In simultaneous tactile studies, symmetric ﬁgures appear to be the “good” or
“strong” ﬁgures.

�NE UROLOGY

34
CONCLUSIONS

Ability to identify and localize asymmetric simultaneous tactile stimuli
develops gradually during the ﬁrst decade of life, and is present in 80 per
cent of normal children by the age of eight. Symmetric stimuli are more
readily localized and this ability is well developed in normal three year old
children.
2. The errors on asymmetric (bilateral and ipsilateral) stimulation involve
either extinction (only one of the two stimuli is reported), or displacement
(one or both stimuli are mislocalized). Whenever extinction and displacement occur, stimuli to the face tend to be correctly reported. This face dominance is found at all age levels tested.
8. One can conclude that extinction and displacement of tactile stimuli,
as well as face dominance, constitute a normal and consistent pattern of rechilin
these
addition
In
children.
observe,
in
to
one
can
responses
sponse
dren under six years of age, the phenomena of allesthesia, exosomesthesia and
partial displacement as normal reactions to simultaneous tactile stimulation.
4. The difficulties in recognition of simultaneous tactile stimuli, as shown
by young children, reappear in the same fashion in adult patients With focal
or diffuse dysfunction of the brain. The abilities of tactile discrimination acquired by the child during growth are lost by the adult who develops mental
changes as a result of cerebral damage.
1.

REFERENCES

M. B.; FINK, M., and GREEN, M.:
Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests
0f face and hand, Th Am. Neurol. A- 751
250, 1950; BENDER, M. B.; FINK, M., and
GREEN, M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand, Arch. Neurol.
5‘ P sychiat. 661355, 195.12. BENDER, M. B.: Extinction and prec1p1tation
of cutaneous sensations, Arch. Neurol. 8c
Psychiat. 54:1, 1945; KOLB, L.: Observations on the somatic sensory extinction phenomenon and the bOdY sch—eme after unilateral resection of the posterior central gyrus,
Tr. Am. Neurol. A' 75: 1950'
3- BENDER’ M' 3'; WORTH, 5' B" and CRAMER’
J“: Organic mental syndrome w‘th phenomena of extinction and allesthesia, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 59:273, 1948.
4' SHAMRO’ M . F .'’ FINK’ M. ’ and B ENDER ’
M. B.: Exosomesthesra, or the phenomenon
1c e ment of sensation into extra p er
o f di spa
8‘ Psychiat. 68:481’
Neurol.
Arch.
space,
$109221

717, 1949.

1. BENDER,

_

5'

_

_

M. F and
Extinction
phenomenon in
FELL , A . W,
..
hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. 8c Psychiat. 62:
BEND-ER

M B

.

SHAPIRO

SCHAP-

M. 3,;
The face-hand test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome, Neurology 2:46,

6. PINK, M_; GREEN,

M" and

BENDER,

1952,

J” and

M. B.: Perceptual
patterns during recovery from general anesthesia, J_ Neurol., Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat.
14:316, 1951_
8 . COHN, R., and RAJNES, G. N.: On certain
aspects of the sensory organization of the
human brain: A study in rostral dominance
as determined by ipsilateral simultaneous
stimulation Tr Am Neurol A '74'162
1949. COHN, R.: On certain aspects of the
human brain:
sensory organization of the
.
.
.1
f
A
Ch‘d‘en’
II
Neurolsggljylfllgastlrgsﬁommancem

7_

JAFFE,

BENDER,

1

9. GREEN, M., FINK, M., and BENDER, M. B.:
.
.
.
Order 0 f dominance in cutaneous perception.

Tr. Am. Neurol. A. In press.

10. JAFFE, J., and BENDER, M. B.:

The factor of

symmetry in the perception of two simultaneous cutaneous stimuli, Brain 75: part 2,
167-176’ 1952’

�All, [:w.,¢fﬂ (f

P

Aﬂu‘

f 1

\. 3/“5

”a...” «w

0'

V

-—«

‘

"1“"

‘3'".

:’
I
‘1

-

momswammanual
I!
W

swam new

m cm

h
I“ m,

I.B.*’

'

and

MM! 3. Bind”. Id).

mun-11:16:11.0.
’0

«mum»: 11» 3.11m mama, 1m: 1m:

mum tar mama.

"Aida! w 1 numbin- fro- the national
Pauly-1: .
than mil: III um. 11: out, by a mat-1114M
contact“ for Cerebral
any in In tori: easy. In: .

m the 0991141th

�1.

max: 160mm and 1mm mun «mu
appliad “minnow” $9 tho that and tho ma (ﬂu ”fleas—hand
lam]. adult.

taut”) (1). una1o halt aha aubaaota ara inanrract on tha 1n1t1a1
trial. all ara «errata hr Ina tenth trial at tho taut. than:
childran, hauavar, find thla tank or teantatyins and laaaliatna can
akin “mutton! mums. may mm only ma of til. we
atianll, at 1: thaw rapart tho tan. traauautly'ataloaaltaa «no or
than (1). 1h» allaazan orjuaalaoaltaattan or actual: 1a not
haphaaard but fallaaa a «cantatant pattarn 1n.wh1¢h atmauli to tha
taco ara raaa117 appraeiatad (Wand: doaanant') lhilﬂ thaaa ta ta.
hand ara not (”laaat duatnant').
In ardar to datawaﬂna aha aca at ahxah anon taetila paraaptual
taaka arr carraetxy partamaad and tho pattara or “daainanaa” in
ohildran. a atudw at naaaal childran was undareakan. 2h. aaaponaaa
or ahildran to tha taaanhand taut, and to ataultanaaua taetila taaha
at othar bad: parts, I!!! aaaartalnad.

m mm. M aura «mm m:- a M15hmm «mu
um
aaraa
altnaaa at lallavua Hospital.
eara cantor. are:
ﬁba

and

and

childran a: naishbara and trianna. an»: aura lithmnm aanitaat
ataardar of tha aarvaua .1".Im A tau childran at two and a halt
yaara or an. aura inclnaad in tha that. win! asp gruup, but
ganaraxly, yuanaar children wart not aha. ta culprahann tho taut.
Qua childran mama aaaaanad individually. in: that. aura nun:
who aura asaainad in a dar~roua in full via! at ethar aubsaata. 1h»
ehtla III ansasad 1n play and ahnn toys vara available thaw aura
and to sun tho mum «mum. and trauma. at amﬁaa during

�2.

W “atom to” an intimate“.
rer tat rue-Mad «at, the «mu um um:

tho 91.7,

”I

(Matt)

a mains to touch you,” and ho m to "touch the «no plan. I
touch.” no m and to 31m hit or». the minor, with an
ringers, then $5..“an mm $ «but and tho donu- ot the
hand
what

m “in“. a» «mu m um
m
tilt. Ind to point 39 HI. um “mama. m” tt“ mpmu,
the an: m and to “on M: om mun. lad an the opposite
emu-tutor”.

at

mm.

can mun-1: imam, tall tho more
an. mpmo no man to ma mu. tn. child m

chock and hand

1: only
1: than

“W

um

an bun new «mm:
an."
that no trial. the shock and hand an tho um
31“ at tho body an “and in 1 3mm mum. m um and
not. or "pawn body Mt int 01mm
tutu trul“mum a: mm: «mm or both
m. vmm up» at

”1le

m
m.
«mum an m - “Mex-01m” «mum of ”M910
316.3,
luft Mud;
parts

body

on

meat.

u 213% chock and

'hmlaum” “mutton or ”mutt-to may put: an the um “do
or t!» body, I: right chock and right hand. and madam"
“mutton or ”mud. body nuts, I. both checks or both man.
1!: «oh child until at hut «a tuna: war.
Such mt- nu
mm
mad“. Bub-cam: «at. a: at»: W mu, portend in a
11-11” fauna”. mu 5.3::ch mu} at last 20 «mun
cm).- were ovum 1:: «oh mun.
A

mm.- at modiﬁcation: and to

tundra. um:
an

am with ma aloud, but imam
men mu tho me: in". mind

would not play the

hoping m1:- Qm can. In

“sacrum.

he introduced ta:- yams

Aloe.

tMomhrotMandtmmem

-

�3.

chum insist“ on pointing to m minor: ms: mm! m. an
the mun mm . For than «mm. a ﬂu train a! 31min
touch mama. mind to m- tm. «m: a: hand an
mm“,

W
"man. rm. um. with an

will km
the

the «can» of pointing to their

own

My gm:

can-1d out with

«you

upon.

mu emu. am is!» «mu or am» Immanuel
twain tutu an «alarm. 31ml. um: In. ”and ta
Mm but: mm to mime any ”5.106“ run run imam-y
In

Monti” m m mm).
Th0

the

ltro

childrun

plan “mum.

an mt accepted.

comet]; ml. the
but than pom: to

«and

u 1:

did pointing.

m.
that that hid {bit
‘

Iaknd

Vorhnl

ﬁnd

to point ta

mm: at the km. of ”melon

It an «autumn; noted that child!» would
MI “mum. 1..., ma. chock and m.
chub. a- to We! also” on one «book. It
the 1m- yxolm non «amt. mm“ than

m

m

m. mun tutu are muted «was» an, or
’

on

tub-mun: after a up»

a? a

um, «hum

tn an or miss

1.11

um

«mm.

“1-311. other than light touch mm mm
to the unsung. Th.“ manned
tomb (rubbing), uncle
pin puck. and mouth. pan prion.

A:

not:

mum;

m:
may

gunman“ gt;

tutu.

mun"

Young

«at

cum I“: my mm on
m

or calm-on and» the
or an
$31106 to localllo both ntﬂlull during tho initial tﬁn trails of
the {mum mt; any of
rub 0n- opon. In the older
of
children. tho
I) go that
ton amply

tutu-hand

Mr

not

MC»:
ham:

(W

�M

muormmmmmumtormmeum:

«manned to lake emu after the initial ten
triﬂe . Aypemtly
the ability to identify two
Immemly applied mule ennui
me directly related to the we of the «and.

m- «mu» m the related tn the mm or previous

mu of the face—head tent.

fun. I, the tr“). 0: the teet
after which the alum nee eminently cmeot 1e recorded. The
net «Inn of the hue mama» en the etheote who nude
emre
1a the nut ten mun; end on
may triu- at the teet
the
tenth. Graph II 11130th thin vellum tar
“looted use

m
etimlettm

man;

In

Wme.

em»

In theee
mute”). Ina heterolesm
were carried out at random. Errata were slide
by
eubJeete at all ese
in teete or either type.
95'

me

Wham

teete. mt: ee both chem, or bath heme.
maul: intenpereea in
the teeting after the fourth
mn. elicited can-eat renames in
nearly e11 onee. Me true «reed
u e clue to em or the older
children that two etmn were being applied.
it did not “an to
alter the reenlte 1n the younger «mum. In the“ eubjeete

“ohm teet mm amarmtu Warm,
even though the reenmeee to the
”metric etinuu m been amt.perception of mute «m: an moi: better this:
“metric
“mu.
“tenant MM‘ or the totel
of ammo“ emu,
m
I'm-bend teete were
«Noemi; tﬂele or the

‘l‘he

A

’

.

reputed at

“mm tntemle eubeeemt to

initial touting in to children. or the children under the ace
an. mmumt tut-1m engage the em ditﬁaultiee emu

teete

over 6

um

me

etmutione

the

of

“cum

evident an the mute). examination. In e ten
children
or «use, who seemed to lave
the concept or two
in the auntie). tenths, emu were meanest on

W

�5._
lubiOQnﬂnt

mooaum

43):.

It III

1mm

a; it'unay trials aura nooonuary tar
of the tuk. and aim, mm though the tuk

Inna-unrully aunplotod, tho laurntnz uni tauparlrw. than:
abacrvutxonn are in central: to that: undo in nernnl
Odnltl. in
lawn tubaoqnant ﬂouting did not ultelt tho
error! 0: Ch. initiil
cost (1).
$223,535,!Itt953lggbggggggggg;

by

mum,

on

Muted

its arrow:

m

(Ethic I) and.

mu. or m tum-Inna m: am at an

typed: (n) u touoh on the chuck only. implying an
pcrcoption in an.
hand; (b) a touch on ouch chock. tnvlyins I
Italoclllsntian of thc
stinulna :pplicd to the bind: (a) a touch on thn dutch, and u aecend
tuueh on the uh auldnr. neck or elbow, implying u

partial

tion or the act-ulna upleud to tan hand; (d) a touch

on

n13100¢11la~

tbs hand

only, Ilplring no porodpttoa 1n thn chock; (a) n taucu on cash hand
implying a niuloealisattan at the chuck stimulus to thn bind. and
(f) on. or tun taught: on tut alaninor's body. implying a

um W m-

Illlocllillw

the «Inw- body.

Flea "dalinundo” (rtspanuoo a, £9 3) an: appurvnt 1n I11
as.
grdupl. It nun Inst unnzthnt as c:t1nction* or the uttnulun to the
hand (response 3). tad II! Icon in 6a! of thc
errata. lialocnlizatton
or the hand Itilnlut tn ch. chock (dtnplnoqnnnt)
wt: obaorvod in 31!
or en. 03:93.. ﬂail. Hunt at thy dinplaocnnutl var. obnorvud

‘03:: involving

in

abnok and hind an

appetite class or the body. I! of
tho aurora was: ddnpllaclauts tram the hand to tun shack in tho
w I rm 1m ‘*vwr‘
Trt“7~
«*~
1*
urn 9 ?“ie' 4L1“
.r‘mr 3
"'1
anon dlzlod “untinatian' at a nut-alum.
Iﬂl
omnlilatton
or
x
gore t to tho hdualasduu bod? part of thy nueand stdlmnnn tn dulled
«up tomcat.”
at a wept 1n the “mum of
the ltdond act-min. 1:unlmnmum
culled
"partial
In much instinct,
tho ntzluznl which 1: corruotly rapewtuddiaplncunnut.”
1: said to be “dominant.“
.

m

w

�6.
sinnltunoans ntﬂnnlattua at hannzutavll body parts. 0.3. right ¢hsok
and right hand. At auah tilt. the chilc Iould point to the catch
once, saying ”a touch hit..” and than. raving his finger: 5-3 can.
lint! an the aback, 3&amp;7. ”and hurt.“

0th.: typcn at «Laplaoa-nat Hurt turraquont. intro wort
partial dimplaocnnntl frnn‘thn hand ta the nhauldcr or nook.

llllocalisltian or

.- anuzmu

(3)

t stinhlu: mat!!! the uidliuo of tho body, known
m ”mama: imam in the «mm. to the

touting. rurthoanuro, childrin under {Iva
years or as. :rvqulntly'ninlooulssnd ta. Initial utiuulation away
tram thair body to part: of tho nan-anor*a boar 9: into space
(rampant. r). rhi- pupae-aaan. known a: iﬁoﬂHIOIihllil (u), per-11:06
in OHIO children despit- rupeutad lt1-n1a330an vita tn. child'- are:
open. and despite tan ell-Lucr'u tastntcnat that 1: III the child
hand an hutcralacoun

that

had beta tauahnd.

A

Anothor phannnnnoa III Inna during ho-mlatovnl touting. ihe
child uuuld ropnrt only tn. ttxunlun applied to the check. It the
uxtntnor askod insistinsly. ‘Bid yuu r001 anothnr touch anywhnro

also?" alanine: at nhildrun

quld hanttatingly point to the

syn-etrlanl point‘ln tan
ordor to

chock on tho apposito side or the body.
detomnxnp uhoﬁhar this vac a unigua or I Iritalntte

phenanonon.

In

tout. or «that bed: parts var. carried out. In henolcternl

tests or root

and hand. showman: Ind hand. and about and

rant. the

It.» phanoInnan.ﬂla ohm-twee. in. «E114 txrnt reported only the
feat, tho thauldor er ‘a. catch - and thou, whoa tho attains? inaxated
a acoand locus. point-d to the appositu fact, guanine» an aids of
thy rice.

on

Furthanlaro, in non. young «aileron, tho phnnulanou appeared
on linslc :ttnulatiou. singlu atannli applied in any body part
would bi correctly localixac. It tho ‘mlninor adv insisted that
"tram
,

_,_, L¥=§

‘&amp;:‘-’

�7.
churn had bcon a Iguana skinning. the child petntod hnl1tltznaly
appease aid. e: um body.
uni-ms pm on
to

m

an

0.1mm indium. and 4mm“ (mpmu g and g)
an tnnu-hnnd
was intrnqunnt. It nus abnothd 1n 7’ of in. crrarl
tents. In all tubdcatl 1n wasn't: an: appurunt, uuhuoqucnt
a: tan ruao~hnnd tout unairnatnd can pn‘%crn at run.
A.

trial.

dcnlnnnoo.

other

sun had:
aggggggggg£,§ga§,gag;zgg§L, In taut. or part. or
ulnar! 10¢It admin-at
uhnn tho ran. and hand, tun hand

It.

loot. salultunooun tent: or 190$ and hand. tn.
toot~annd tout. worn introdaaod after the initial ton 8:111! at
tn. taco-hand tact 1n Inn: ohildrtn. In 8h. feat-hind tent. feet
11).
dauinnnao In: taparont in 5x! at tho rcupanloa (In. that:

and

th.

cup-k tho

nanitoat by hand axttnottou; by dinning-nun: a: hand actual:
and
to uh. tout; and by par£111 displucullut to the this». knot,
1.3.
who and. Irruru
§§§55;5L,A 3-513 area» or childrou.

It

was

with 0th.:
in tents repentod at varrtns tutorVIJu warn nunltnod
cutuusoun Itinnli. Izttnotian Qua allpllaulant phone-nan.unro
prick
prettnt 1n tacoohnad tent. Etta: pin pr1ok. rupotxtivc pin
uuaxo tn. gumbo: at
and rcpotitivo touoh (rubbing) attlulitionl.
tuudh uttunzi.m
orrorl with than. stimuli I‘l‘ town: than with
of tuna dunialnoc and bind untiuotzon In: ntill laplrcnt.
~

W
pattern

ability to idontitr tad 100311£0
sepnruhod tron ouch 9th.» at nun» «titans.
Th.

ntnultanoonn lit-n11
LI 3 culplcx runntion
1:
agenda of 1110.

It
grudullly dcvnlup: during tn. £12.:
tho attic of tho
a relatichy unltahlo ab1lity. tar Inn: china»: in
otrobrnl alt-n:grannimn eta diutnrb tuna disarm-tnntlonn. focal

which

�8.

in heeipiegie (5) er perietei lobe ieeione (a); epinei cord
leeiane (23); end difruee brain dieeeeee ee taxie etetee, seniiity
end inflammatory aenditiane (6) zen eo alter tactile dieerininetiaa
that the phenunene of extinction and diepieeelent became pruninent.
lrrere in simultaneoue teetiie teete ere apparent in aerial eduite
ﬂaring the initiel tee trieie at the tent -- during the period or
“learning” (1). Pereene eubaeotod to ierge doeee or barbituratee
(6), electromehook therepy (6) or eneetheeie (7) eieo leniteet such
en

inability.

'

pro-inent feature in all sreupe ie the unifornity of race
dominance. when dieerieinetion or eieuiteneeue stimuli in
interfered with, for thetever reeeon, the errors are made in the
etmluli to the head and not in the etinnii to the tece. The
cavalier: or “face delinenee” ie “hand extinction.“ it, too. is
apperent in e11 etheete end under the variety or ccnditioue studied.
further-ere, in en ”order or daninenee” other body peril ere
A

tee limite. Bennie: in petieute with helipiegie (5)
end petiente with eevere mental chensee ee e reeuit or brain
between theee

dieeeee (6) here revealed an order at equinenee or teee~ehoui¢er~
trunkathixh-teot and bend. Ineorar ee theee other body parts were
etudied in theee children, e eieiler order tee observed. Since
dominance ie evident in young children, it eppeere that the pattern
or dominenae in en inherent function or the arsenien. This
chidiheed new of reeponding to einniueneaue tactile stimuli in
expoeed end exaggerated in edulte ander e variety or pathological
oonditione.
Recently Cohn bee suggested a theory at reetrli dominance to
explein theee obeervetione (8). Our oheervetione are not in accord
with each a theory. The dominence of the-toot to the hand in

�9.

children, an wall I. the douinlnco of penis, buttock, that and thigh
to the hand in two large aerial of patients with diffuae bruin
artfunction (6, 9) Elk. such an explination untenable.
a in lethal Childrun with Findiggu‘;g

PM

oclparins Eh. tinﬁinsu in ohildron with than. prawiounly
roportod in patient. with .QVOTC Inuit: chtngos an. to hrnin dylrunetian
(6), a clot. nililnriey in pariah-anon in obturvod; In both group:
tn. ability to dilcrilihtti Silaltnntoul Itiluli in lilitod. 0n
aon—hanolosous tactilu touch. Inah II the rte-«hand hatt, error: it.
0n

and: on initial and suhncnunnt triulu. Hhilo astinntioa or a thinning
1! the unit Iroquant error. diaplhoalnnt 1! cannon. In both childvun
and viii-nth, errors occur with a vurioty at cutnnoons Iii-n11.
lurthnmnmrv. touting In: tritulntly h. done with 01': open, and in
sin: ihntcnooa. with ropaatod Vtrhal ulna: that than. tr. ewe
atiluli and still arr!!! Ito undo. 1h. {later or learning 1: not
pro-inont niuoo touting on tableau-ht any: will olioit tho previous
pattctnod errata. In Gottﬂlt tum-n. patient. with organic anneal
dctocta and ohildron have dirtiauity in extracting a ao-piua non-cry
”right!” frun thy ”buneroani” of the total Ionlary "field.”
Significantly in each group inure in no difficulty in idantitying.
linultanoaua Iii-uli if thy stimuli are applied in syn-attic regions
at tho body, Inch it each hind or both 3140. ot-thn than. 3390, each
Itilnlun figure ha. a cal-an background in turns of body insgo, unholy,

en. "mm." (in),

In both groups. that dalinlnco it apparcnt. It in InnlfGIt not
only on test. of tuna and hund but Illa on teats or that had othcr body
part3. Alto, innotlr II it II! tostod, thn order of dunintnec for
othcr body part. in lililnr.
while extinction and displaculont are the halt frequent typco

�10.

or error, othcr annualanu are elicitcd in both children ind patinnta.
Partial dinplusoamnta. 0.5. tan uislocalisation of thc pochpt tram
tho hand to in. nhaulder or neck on the racowhnnd test, It. cool-ioually
obnervod. Th. phcaonnnn or ”allouthnsia" Ina ”axe-anesthesia“ are
seen in the more severely affictcd patiatn and an. raunxoat childrvn;
bath are franunntly unlooiuted in the same subjeeta. In nllcpthoaia,

tat

uuhjootu usually localine tbs chock ltinmluu correctly but

niuloauliuc the hand Itilulus to thc appetitt hand or clbav. In
cxosaunathouia, the ttinnli are ninlocslizod either to Iptcc in front
of th: subject er to the uxnnincr'i body. This phcuancnon was
frequent in the youngest ohildrcn, Ind despit¢ the nan-ingr'a urging
the child pdrnilted in web
the cum to point to its on
niuloellisationn until I trial of the flag-hand toot nus perfornnd

m,

with eye: open.

nation to than phenomena

mm-

apantaneaualy,
patient: with orgtaio umutul syndruno also naniront Iuother respaano
In

sauna

to simultaneous stimulation rirut noted in children. 1.3., an
honolnteral rice-hand testing only on. stimulus (the aback) in
spontaneously reported; but yuan tho examintr insists. tbs second it
ninlocnlixod ta thn apposite chuck. since the pationtl than IO Ian:
niuiltritics in their reapoaacs to young children, it was prodiatod
that they would ulna ahcu this phnnannnau. In I series a! patient.
with tavern nautal chins... hamolateral taut: or the cheek, nine.
(out, thouldor and thigh wart avplicd. ”bun uni: ant nth-alum III
reported, the aI-inor Inked for the loan. at the scoond ntinulua.
Runyon... varb obtained in 20% of thc patientl, and in each one tn.
second utiuulus an: uinlcotlixod to thy ayunetric body part.
Purthornarv, in none subjects tbs name phenomenan III observed with
single utilnlntion.

�11.

This phone-soon sppssrs to ho sisilsr to tho cosplstiou
phone-soon described iu dostslt litersturs ss 'closurs” sud ”good

oontinnstion.” fhsss srs—usoslly describsd for othsr ssnsory
Iodslitiss. Uhsn s circle is tschistoscopicslly sxpossd in tho
visual risld so thst hslr fslls on s hssisnopic risld. or it s cross
is exposed so thst tho contor tolls in tho blind spot, ssny
subjects rsport s cosplsts circls or cross. This ”cosplsticn'
occurs for “good” figurss. In sisnltsnsous tsctilc studios,
syn-stric figurss spoosr to to tho "good“ or ”strong" figurss.

W
’

l. shility

to idshtiry sud locsliss ssyI-stric simultaneous
tsctilc stisuli dsvslops grsduslly during ths first docsds of lits,
using prsssnt in 80‘ or nornsl childrsn by tho sac of sight yssrs.
Syn-stric stﬂ-uli soc smrs oosdily locslissd and this shility is
ssll dsvolopsd in non-s1 three your old children.
2. the own on umtric (hilstsrsl sud ipsilstsrdl)
sti-nlstion involvs sithor extinction (only cos of the two stisuli
is rsportsd). or displscslsnt (cos or both stimuli srs nislocsliscd).
Hhsnsvsr sxtihcticn and displscsssnt occur. stimuli to tho tscs tend
to to corrsotly rspostsd. this "fscc dcsdnshcs' is found st sll sgs

lsvsls tsstsd.
3.

ans can concluds thst sstincticn sud displsoslsnt or

tsetils stisnli. ss ssll ss rscs dosinshcs, oonstituts s

now-s1

sud consistent pottsrn ct rsspohss in childrsn. In sddition to
thsss rssponsss ons osn observe, in childrsn under six yssrs or age,
tho phsncsons or sllssthssis, sacsosssthssis sad psrtisl displscsssnt

ss nonssl resctions to silultsnsous tsctils sttlnlstion.
h. rho difficulties in rscosnitioh ct silnltsasons tsctils
stimuli, ss shown by young childrsn, rssppssr in tho sons rsshion

�12.

in adult patient! with focal or dittuuo dyutuaatian or the bwltn.
The abilities or taettlc discrimination acquired by the child aura»;
growth are lost by tbs adult who develop: Inntal change. an I rniulﬁ
of cerebral Gianna.

�13.

ﬂlFMGE

m,
1;;
(a)

1.

and mm, 11.: Pattern. in pox-owner!
l.
rm.
tut. or no. and hand. Tram.An.umol.Auoc.l

ILL,

tn 31-111mm:

250-252, June, 1950.

'

W,

PINK. I.
mm. 11.3.,tutu
8:) alumnae“:
or no: and hand.

§_6_g_

mm,
unutionn.

a.

(3)

._

309mb“,

1951.

11.:

in perception

Pattern:
mh.nm1.tn Mutt"

and pmlpttation of autumn
ntmtien
”chasm-111.Iul'lzomnt.l 2.}. 1-9. July, 195.

11.3.;

«11m extinction
In: Observttionu on tho scuttle
of thc
unilaton'liinuction
utter
body
and
the
phone-anon
patent: central gym... $311.43.!mol.Auoc., 15}. June. 1950.
11.11.. mm, 3.3. and mm, 1.: tax-mun ”111111 amore“
mm,
of extinction and ant-than. Amhgmﬂﬁﬂnhut.
with
(D)

3.

355.362,

and

um

1101.3,

9mm

11.3.: humane-u, or the
I. or1.,dnpnocunt
rm, I. andormm
situation
into exam-personal men.
human
7111
preparation).

1.

31112130,

5.

SHAPED. NJ. and SCEM’PILL, 1.3.: ntinntion
I.B.,
mm,
phone-anon 1n 11.111103“. mh.£om1.trnzah1ut.l Q. 7174'”,

Decanter, 19kg.

$3.1 m two-dune tent is
tad
m,
m,
stagnant“ sign or organic until Imam. umlm‘ g;
It.

I!”

a

6.

FIRE,

7.

J. and mm, ILB. Parceptual ptttomu during maven
um,
IMIthOIiI. J. gurolquhzcmt.‘ .134.
moral
rm
316—321, 3951.

136.58,

x

'

(a) com, R. and RAM, 0.3.: 011Aeon-tun "peat. of the unnory
organisation or the has»: but!" study in rental «drum. n
«teamed by unilateral umltmomn stimulation. mm.m.nm1.
"""""""""""""'""'""""

8.

”.00., It!

10.

Mo

19%.

or the union crewman at
certain
“poet:
A
dwinunoc 111 children.
or
11.
rantml
Itudy
the bum brain:
(11)

'

169,

com, Rd

On

”union, 3;, 119-122 (nu-ch) 1951.
31., ”It, I. and mm. 11.3.: 0rd» of ammo. 1n tactile
mm,
perception. (in prepmtion).
the are. tint:
J. and mm II.B.: m tutor or ulna-ybe1n911111121106)?
””8,
(to
or two simultaneous 311th “1.1111.
Min,

�m;

mm or May or the now-83M mt

aw

Comet Rupmurp.
(Touch

1‘93-

Nahum

'

sex-nu)

WAGorgoot

manure.
efﬂuent:
3

39

t

31»

5

37

,6

36

7

26

8

22

9

23

10

20

11

21

12

an

13-1529

iggggglgg

rump-mm
all

"

1025

~-1_-11-.2
~~1.22»1~

.21321--».‘,
--125n~2.
1262~122~

£63-21-a-

28‘sal--26515-1--6821-1-21
3746 -3..n106#21~-2

33

‘28
28
22
-_

10
x
3

a
0
2

o

�W

Foot-Band

iblt

(Touch Stimuli)

'8!IIBIITIUR"“TU!I£

IRIALS

.0

00

O

Foot

n

,

Ft.~lt.

Kind

talatoral

53

21

17

1

10

2

2

Ipuilaturnl

#8

23

16

3

3

3

0

�"

FER CENTOF GROUP
,,

I:

\. 4’

PER CENT ERROR AFTER

k

O!

39V

8

N
O

(,J

O

43

O

U1

O

ERRORS

MAKTNG

IO
63

O

K

TRIALS

\l
O

03

O

«0

O

OOI

�THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
NEW YORK CITY

MONTHLX NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH SEMINAR

TUESDAY

27,

NOVEMBER
BOARD ROOM

-

2nd

8:30 P.

1951

M.

FLOOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING

EQGMM

THE PERCEPTION OF MUETIPLE STIMULI

Ia

II.

DR. MEX FINK AND DR. MARTIN GREENE:
TACTILE D.D.S.

DR. ROBERT L.

KAHN AND

DR. EDWIN

A

PATTERNS

WEINSTEIN:

OF

RESPONSES

ON

(UNTITIED PAPER)

DR. W.

S.

CHAIRMAN

BATTERSBY

�}
r
l

x

}

um um.

W“;

%

ﬂu—é“: 145m’

"I 5’44. 1’31“

_

4L
‘

3,

,.

I

Q

~

‘

_n

‘ﬂu‘

I...

A..—

"-4

A4—

‘ﬂ‘
N11,,
’

.‘ “

������Fluid
Spinal
Findings
Following Cerebral Angiography
Joseph M. Stein, M.D. and Max Fink, M.D.

WITH increasing use of cerebral angiography, the problem arose as to whether

the procedure, of itself, produced changes in the cerebrospinal ﬂuid. Fortyeight hours after angiography a spinal ﬂuid examination in a patient suspected
of a brain tumor revealed a cloudy ﬂuid with 3,000 white blood cells per
cu. mm. Prior to angiography the ﬂuid had been clear, colorless and without
any cells. As no information concerning the relationship of pleocytosis to
angiography was available, it was decided to study the changes in the spinal
ﬂuid by the usual clinical methods.
Spinal ﬂuids from 21 patients were examined prior to and following angiography. Lumbar punctures prior to angiography were done at various intervals, but all punctures following angiography were performed between 12
and 24 hours after the procedure. In each instance the spinal ﬂuid was exam—
ined for color, cell count and total protein content.
All angiograms were percutaneous, using 35 per cent Diodrast as the contrast medium. Maximal Diodrast volume was 70 ml. at one procedure. While
the majority of patients were subjected to unilateral carotid punctures, bilateral punctures were done in four, and combined bilateral carotid and vertebral punctures in one patient. Either intravenous Pentothal (14 cases) or
local procaine (seven cases) anesthesia was used.
RESULTS

Of the 21 subjects, signiﬁcant changes in the spinal ﬂuid following angiography were seen in only two cases. In one, a patient with a cerebral angiomatous malformation and multiple aneurysms, 5,000 red blood cells per
cu. mm. were seen in a pink spinal ﬂuid. In the second, a patient with a
chromophobe adenoma of the pituitary gland, the protein content of the spinal
ﬂuid changed from 89 to 151 mg. per cent; also, seven lymphocytes per cu. mm.
were recorded when previously there had been none.
In all other subjects, changes in color, protein content and cell count were
not signiﬁcant. Three subjects showed transient hemiparesis following anFrom the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of Medi—
cine and the neurologic service (third division) and psychiatric division, Bellevue Hos—
pital, New York City.
Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol. 3, N0. 2

137

�NE UROLOGY

138

giography, and in none of these were there signiﬁcant changes in the spinal
ﬂuid. Since Diodrast can cause changes in membrane permeability,1 and the
spinal ﬂuid reﬂects such changes, it could be postulated that a relationship
between complications following angiography and changes in the spinal ﬂuid
might exist. Such changes were not demonstrated in the present cases. F urther investigations with more exacting techniques for protein determination
and protein differentiation are indicated.
CONCLUSIONS

Neither a marked pleocytosis nor a marked increase in protein content of
the spinal ﬂuid are usual concomitants of Diodrast angiography. It may be
concluded that when such spinal ﬂuid changes are found they are unrelated
to the procedure.
REFERENCE

0.:

Cerebral angiography: Tolerance for contrast media of diodrast type,

1. OLSSON,

J. Neurol, Neurosurg.,
1949.

6c

Psych, 12:312,

�afnuéwlc4’43hm
774449711

Min-1.

KM
spam: main ﬁndings mnmm mum: mug-play

Alon/«4J7? 4.5;}2

zlr"

777':

137-?

L/r—s

g-

If...” no 3"}! ”in.

l“ Bax ﬂak $.13.

inoronuiag II. or norohrul ungiogrlyhr up i!!! toot
aoarruncoa with in. )robluu of uhothcr tho proaodurn.?ut itaolr.
pruduaad dhnagoo in the earnbrospianl fluid. rawtyunéght hour:
utter ungiegrnphg; a spinal fluid unanianttca int: yqtimut In.unme900%“ o: a
and; 27mm with
blood tall: pow cubic willltcr. ?tlew to unsiegruphy eh. {lama
and without any any.
ma how
infant“
clan containing tan rolgtleaahlp or pluoaytouta to ungtuguuﬁny
in. avgllablo. 1% Ian aoasdod to study ﬂu. dhanﬁog 1h tho spinal
Wick

m

mu m. mum .

a.“

am. ”mm.

llnid

by ﬁbe_unus1 01131931 nnﬁhndu.

‘

Spinal fluids tram tuouty-uno pationta wank $munincd print
to and running mum-33mg. 1mm: pun-mm Mar to nag!“—
phy tor. don. at various ia$¢rvnln._huk :11 pun-tuﬁcs rolluuinu Ina
glogruphy uumo partarnma hoﬁuoonyln anﬂ

SQ

hear: ﬁitor in» procew

tying: {tula can «hunlncd for 00109.
0011 gaunt ‘nd total protein ooatnnt.
£11 angiogru-I Inn. pnruutaaonua. uniac;aiﬂ aladraut an
Eh. «entrant Inﬁlllm Hand-:1 dioarunt doing. via 70'. a! an. atsa
Isaac, “anal. Eh. aujoritx at pgticnta wort auh1oato¢ to unilateral
anvctid puuttnruug hilnwurnl gunnturua vat. dam. in fan: putluntn
darn. In

Ogah {uncanno ch»

3

an! canbinoﬁ bilazqrul suretzd and v.:%.hrn1 in «at. Eiﬁhar intravunoun ponaothal (I! an...) a: local nrmuntun (v 0....) uaaaehnain
van 3308.

3

�gggultgt
or uh. twentybonp‘nnbjootl, signirionnt «nausea in the
”spinnl fluid thlloving-angiogruphy warn anon in only two out...
In «an. a pttiunt with n acrobtul nugiountoua malformation and
multiplo unnuryunu, 6000 rod blood «.11: pl? cubic millitor won.

in a pinkidh colorod spinal fluid. In the uncond. u pationt
with n ohrauophobo adonaln or the pituitary gland, thy pictoll
content of tho lbinnl fluid oh‘ngod Iran 89 uilligrml por'uone
ta 161 3111151.: par cant. Alto. lava: lynphonyton per aubio mils
noon

lilihor wort
I

And

racowdod whoa prbviaunly thorn bud boon noun.

In ‘11 nth.» nubjootu. chanson in 90102. praz-in aunt-n:
call count war. no: significant. Ebro. subjects aurforod trsnn-

in.noao wcro thnr. significant august. in
tun apinul fluid. In two subjectl. ﬁne apinnl fluid romainod an»
ohangod. In thy third. far aronntod :04 blood cell: and twa
nymphooytoo per eubio nillilitor turn notod, what. non. had boon
inacn prior to thy pron-aura. Binao diodrune can onus. ohungon in
membran- perusubilsey (1}. ﬁnd tho spinal fluid reflect. august:
in cm. manna... u my be paw-ha than a. rel-Mon menu
ounplicntiann ﬁnd such change: axintn. audh changun Into not do-

iont haniparonil.

and

nonntrntod hart. vurchsr inyuatigntioaa vith.noro oxnoting tooha
bio: for protein dutorninntion and protein ditrurontiation are in»
diontod.

W

.

ploooytonin nor a ngrkad inoronno in protoiu content of an. [pinnl fluid urn uuuul oonoanituntu or aiodrn-t
angiogruphy. it'nuy ho aonaluaod Shut ihon Inch apin;l fluid
chanQOa urn found. thqy uri unrolatod to an: groundnut.

llithnr : lurkod

�HO! £3523

'

Angiogmphy: relax-ma. {for
01am. 0.: 00113an
01'
Contact
M1. Diner“: . o J. Roux-o]... Mum-m...
a: hymns. 33:313—816. (am. i949.

�x-

"e" ' " "-’

-

1'

' I?“ .. J-

A"

J

,

~ ~‘,"~’rnr

-m.

_.—»,-nn,v~..wni~

~-

1-...

.

l“. 9,,

.w.

Presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting - American Academy
Louisville
of Neurology - April, 24, 1952
Dr. Costello, Members, and Guests of the Academy:
In the course of sensory studies by the method of dou-

learned that normal adults
readily identify and localize the tow stimuli within the ini-

ble simultaneous stimulation,

we

tial

Young

ten

trials

of the

test.

children, however, seemed
could not identify both sti-

to make persistent errors. They
muli, or if identifying the tWO stimuli} they could not localize them. In order to study the responses and their relation to the age of the subjects, face-hand tests-~the prototype of simultaneous tactile tests—~were applied to 300 normal
children ranging in ages from 5 to 15 years. The children
were all without manifest disorder of the hervous system, and
were from child care centers, hospital clinics and children of
neighbors and friends.
In the course of some nlay with each child, the examiner
introduced the ﬁace-hané test. In this test, the child closes
his eyes, and the examiner, with his fingers, simultaneously
touches the subject's cheek and dorsum of his contralateral
hand. The child is asked to point to the places where he per-

the child
is asked to close his eyes, and the test repeated-~with opposite cheek and hand stimulated. Subsequently cheek and hand
on the same side of the body and simultaneous stimulation of
both sides of the face, or both hands are included. At least
ten consecutive trials of the face-hand test are recorded for

ceived

each

tje

child.

stmmuli, and the report

is recorded.

Again

�2.
Eighty percent of children under six years of age
failed to localize both stimuli correctly during the initial ten trials. The number of errors fell off sharply among
the older children, so that only 2% of children in the 11-15
year age groups continued to make errors after the tenth trial.\
This is represented in the first graph--.. Apparently the
ability to localize two simultaneously applied tactile stimuli
is directly related to the ageof the subject.
This same relationship is represented in the second
graph.

The

percent of the subjents in each age group making

errors on each trial of the test is compared for representative age groups. Ihe older children manifest an ability to

learn from previous

trials

of the test while the younger chil-

dren do not.

incorrect responses of all children were of two
types--failure to identify one dfithe two stimuli, called
"extinction", hr, identifying two stimuli but mislocalizing
The

'one of them termed "displacement". Extinction of hand stimuli

observed in

of the errors, while displacement was in
51%. The preponderance of errors were in the perception of
the stimulus to the hand. The stimulus to the cheek was almost

was

62%

correctly reported. This ability to identify the cheek
stimulus in preference to the stimulus to the hand was pre—
viously observed in normal adults and termed "face dominance."
always

face dominance was uniformlylapparent in the children of
all age groups in theseries.
The errors were apparent in tests
involving the cheek
and hand on Opposite sides of the body as well as cheek and
Such

!

i

�5.
I

’
‘

I"

hand on the same side of the body. WhileverrorSawere frequent
in tests of face and hand, chillren made no errors in identi-

fying symmetric stimuli, as both cheeks. In the younger
children, partial displacement from hand to homolateral shoulderder or neck, or displacements from a hand to the oppo-

site hand(allesthesia), or

even

into snace in front of the

child(exosomesthesia) were seen. The incidence of these dis-placements
was less than 4%.
Since these phenomena were so apparent in younger children
and became less frequent with increasing age,
it was concluded

that extinction

and the

varieties

I

of displacement are normal

phases in the degqlopment of the response to simultaneous tactile stimuli. In normal adults and older children, such phenomena

are apparent during the

initial

trials

only.
From these studies it was concluded that the phenomena
’of extinction and displacement are normal phases in the dev elopment of the perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli. Face
gew

A

Ar:

4,»-

a.

v12.w_

at all age level; and is an inherent
pattern of organization of function. Ihe perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli is directly related to chronological
dominance

is

observed

age, being gradually develOped in the first decade of life,
and being well developed in 80% of children by the age of 8

years.

e

MW.

._

L.

�EBRUPHYSIOLUGY
“¢

,_

4,

.4.

lAB'RATOT‘Y

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

é

0......w...y

-,..‘u.-

’.
”luau

s..»—..._

Perception of Simultaneous
Tactile Stimuli *in Normal Children

wrvq

Ira

‘

r

,
A»

“WV-'1.......;.,...«-_'....

[Wax Kin/L,

M.D. and Morris B. Bender, M.D.
r

1w

l

.
V»

~4M-I’an‘,‘

.

“and”

...-...a_.~.......~.w:..c-

Amman...»

..

-_.

.w

Normal adults readily identify and localize tactile stimuli applied simul1
taneously to the face and the hand (the "fface--l1and test”). While half the
subjects perceive stimuli incorrectly on the initial trial, all are accurate by
the tLIItlI tIi Il oi the I:.est Young children, however, find the task of identiﬁcation and localization of two skin stimulations difficult. They report only
one of the two stimuli, or, if they report the two, frequently mislocalize one
of them. The omission or mislocalization of stimuli is not haphazard but follows a consistent pattem in which stimuli to the face are readily appreciated
(" most dominant" ) while those to the hand are not (' least dominant” ).
lII mdeI to determine the pattern of' dominance” in children and the age
which
such tactile peiceptual tasks are correctly performed, a study of
at
normal children was undeitaken. The responses of children to the face- hand
test and to simultaneous tactile tests of other body parts were ascertained.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD

.

ca...”

.‘ﬁrw'

-‘-—&lt;-“-~»—«

—

'

\,

Three hundred normal children between the ages of three and 15 were
examined. They were from a neighborhood child care center, from the wards
and clinics of Bellevue Hospital, and children of neighbors and friends. They
were without manifest disorder of the nervous system. A few children at
two and a half years of age were included in the three year age group, but
younger children were generally not able to comprehend the test.
The subjects were examined individually, but there were many who were
examined in a day-room in full view of other children. The child was engaged
in play and when toys were available they were used to gain his conﬁdence
and interest. 'At some time during play, the face-hand test was introduced.
From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of
\icdicinc and the Bellevue Hospital, New
York City.
This work wIs aided in part by a fellowship
grant from the National Foundation for In-

fantile Paralysis, and by a grant-in-aid from
the Coordinating Council for Cerebral Palsy
in New York City, 'Inc.
Read at the fourth annual meeting of the
American Academy of Neurology, Louisville, Kentucky, April 24, 1952.
27

Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, January, 1953, Vol. 3, No.

1

,.

’

4

I»

J

�’3

NEUROLOGY

28
._»--.A:::’mwww

Nu...

..
P...
I.

.

,u.‘

w»

'm

....-w)»...._»:,..-

..

“1'3““-

:7

—y’u«~¢_-'”’(,

.
A

a

""‘f-u-mmﬁr

»«

...._,......&gt;

.I,

.

ww‘.MF—b—4w‘

For the face- hand test, the child was told: "I (examiner) am going to
touch you, and he was to "touch the same place I touch." He Was asked to
close his eyes. The examiner, with the fingers, then touched simultaneously
a cheek and the (lorsum of the contralateral hand of the subject. The child
was asked what he felt, and to point to the sites stimulated After this response. the child was asked to close his eyes again, and now the opposite
(both and hand were similarly stimulated and the report recorded. If only
one Itsponse was given to this trial, the child was asked if there had been
another stimulus anywhere else.
Following these two trials, the cheek and hand on the same side of the body
were tested in a similar fashion. The fifth and sixth trials were not of asymmetric body parts but simultaneous stimulation of both cheeks or both hands.
The following various types of stimulation were used: heterologous stimulation of asymmetric body parts on opposite sides, as right cheek and left hand;
homolateral stimulation of asymmetric body parts on the same side of the
body, as right cheek and right hand; and homologous stimulation of symmetric
body parts, as both checks or both hands. Such tests were repeated in each
child until at least ten trials were recorded. Subsequent tests of other body
parts, performed in a similar fashion, were introduced until at least 20 consecutive trials were observed in each subject.
A number of modifications had to be introduced for young children. Many
would not play the game with eyes closed, but insisted on keeping their eyes
open. III such cases the tests were applied with eyes open. Also, a large number of three and four year old children insisted on pointing to the examiner’s
hands and face on the initial trials. For these children, a few trials of single
touch stimuli applied to the thigh, chest or hand were introduced, until they
grasped the concept of pointing to their own bodies after the stimulation.
These single trials were carried out with eyes open.
After the series 'of double simultaneous stimulation tests were completed,
single stimuli were applied to various body parts to exclude from the normal
group any subjectswith focal sensory difficulties.
The children were asked what they had felt and to point to the places
stimulated. Verbal Ieports of the locus of stimulatiOn were not accepted. It
was occasionally noted that children would correctly name the parts stimulated, i. e., the cheek and hand, but then point to both cheeks, or to two places
on one check. It seemed as if naming the locus yielded more accurate responses than did pointing.
These tactile tests were repeated on consecutive days, or subsequently
after a lapse of a few days or weeks in some children. At such times, cutaneous stimuli other than light touch were added to the testing. These included
repetitive touch (rubbing), single pin prick, and repetitive pin pricks.
_

.

.
.
~‘~-

.mh—wwyﬂn

NJ,“

e.,

.va

RESULTS
.....-..-~_.-

«-~

-

'

’

children made many errors on face-hand tests.
Eighty per cent of children under the age of six failed to localize both stimuli
I ncidcnce‘of errors: Young

,

2mm,

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

29

iooJ

90‘

3

&lt; 60
E
.. 704

9

6° .

'1

3

50a

S

‘0

:2

i

g

a:
0:
“‘

,

_

.
~....._..

1“

90

5

\.\

70‘

3
5

‘-

604

‘

“\

\‘\

\

10‘

\“ ‘~.‘

/\

.

.

304

’i

H.“ .

3 2°

‘~.

5‘56739Dll12046

‘
U

”M

"

“~- J vans
-- -- s vans

'

‘04

3

x

.

so

g

.
-\

.

no

x3

\s

30‘

'

\-\...-.

‘4‘.

nuns

..... '

-~-- 9

,

‘K

vans

n
'5J4ST709210MEG

names

Y

CF TRIAL

AGE
Graph 1.

,

m~w-~m

\‘x‘ ‘

it

6'20

2f

IOO l

g

D-

I:

~—«—-~-..‘..__;__....~_

x

Graph 2.

during the initial ten trials of the face-hand test; many of these even with
eyes open: In the older children the number‘of failures fell sharply (graph 1)
so that only 2 per cent of children in the 11 to 15 year age groups continued
to make errors after the initial ten trials. Apparently the ability to identify
two simultaneously applied tactile stimuli was directly related to the age of
the child. This ability was also related to the number of previous trials of the
face-hand test. In table 1 the trial of the test after which the child was consistently correct is recorded. The last column of the table includes all the
subjects who made errors in the first ten trials, and on many trials of the test
beyond the tenth. Graph 2 illustrates this relation for selected age groups.
Type of testing: In these studies homolateral and heterologous stimulations
were carried out at random. Errors were made by subjects of all age groups
in tests of. either type. Homologous tests, such as both cheeks, or both hands,
randomly interspersed in the testing after the fourth trial, elicited correct‘respouses in nearly all cases. While this served as a clue to some of the older

.W....m~.

TABLE

.

a
.
.

t

(Touch Stimuli)

c

.

m-‘Wn

Age
...._.-.m..;.

3
4

Total Number
of Subjects
39
S4

37
36
26

5

6
7
8

9

10
WWM..W~«.».-.A_.

1

NULIBER OF TRIALS OF THE FACE-HAND TEST NECESSARY FOR PERSISTENT
CORRECT RESPONSES

11

12
13—15

‘22
-

23
20
21
24

29

2

1

3

Trial Correct
4 5 6

8

-

—

1

2.

4

--

1

6

6
3

2.,

4

2

5

-2

1

—

- -2

1

—

—

1

—

1

-3

1

8

2

6
6 8
3 7
4 10

2

.

4

5
2
4
6

-—

5
4
I

6
4

1

1

2

2

2

2

-

—

l

2

1

1
1
1
—

1

—

-1
—

2
2

9
2

,-

-

—
—

2 - - - 2 l
- 2
—
1

—

- -

—

Errors Beyond
10 Trials
34 '
28
28
22
10
4

3
2
0
2
0

�NEUROLOGY

p

,

it did not seem to alter the
hildrcn that two stimuli were being applied,
trials of the
insults in the younger children. In these subjects subsequent
the
responses to the
lee-hand test were incorrectly reported, even though
stimuli was
of
mmetric stimuli had been correct. The perception symmetric
,iuch better than asymmetric stimuli.
of children studied, face-hand
Subsequent testing: Of the total group
to the initial testing in
fusts were repeated at varying intervals subsequent
of
six, subsequent testing elicited
it) children. ()f the children under the age
on the initial examhe same. difficulties with facc~hand tests as was evident
seemed
to have grasped
who
six years of age,
,nation. In a few children over
manifest on
were
errors
in the initial testing.
ghc concept of two stimulations
learnsuccessful
for
3ubsequcnt days. It was as if many trials were necessary
completed,
successfully
task
was
the
‘iig of the task, and then, even though
These observations are in contrast to those made
‘gie learning was temporary.
elicit the errors of the
{i normal adults, in whom subsequent testing did not

tidal

".4

I

test.1

(table 1) made by children on
Type and pattern of responses: The errors six
of
types: (a) a touch on the
i'peated trials of the faCe-hand test were
touch on each cheek,
heck only, implying no perception in the hand; (b) a
the hand; (0) a touch
implying a mislocalization of the stimulus applied to
neck or elbow, implying
in the cheek, and a second touch on the shoulder,
the
hand; ((1) a touch on
to
stimulus
applied
partial mislocalization of the
in the check; (6) a touch on each
he hand only, implying no perception
cheek stimulus to the hand; and (f)
of
land implying a mislocalization the
examiner’s
body, implying a mislocalization away
pie-or two touches on the
grom the child’s body.
all age groups. ’It was
Face dominance ( respbnses a, b, c) was apparent in
hand
the
(response a), and
host manifest as extinction“ of the stimulus to
hand stimulus to
of
the
Mislocalization
.'as seen in 62 per cent of the errors.
of
the
errors. While
cent
31
observed in
per
he cheek (displacement)i was
and hand
cheek
in
tests involving
observed
{rest of the displacements were
displacements
of
the
were
errors
7
in opposite sides of the body, per cent
of homolateral
stimulation
simultaneous
the
in
check
the
hand
to
tom the
child pointed
the
times
such
At
hand.
ody parts, e. g., right cheek and right
2 to 3
his
ﬁngers
b the cheek once, saying 5‘a touch here,” and then, moving
lentimeters lower on the cheek, saying “and here.”
Other types of displacel‘nent were infrequent. There were partial displaceshoulder or neck. Mislocalization of a stimulus
;ients from the hand to the
occasionally apparfeross the midline of the body, known as allesthesia,3 was
children
Furthermore,
testing.
hand
heterologous
the
on
to
int in the stimulus
p

,

-

“

,,
simultaneous stimulations has been called "extinction”
:The failure to report one of 'two of
of the second
a percept to the homologous body part
3i
a stimulus.2 The mislocalization
of the
direction
the
in
of
mislocalization
a
percept
iimulus is called "displacement." The
the stimulus which is
each
"
instance,
In
displacement.”
artial
is
called
lacond stimulus
iorrectly reported is ‘said. to e "dominant."
.

i
.

.
,

l

.

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

31

under ﬁve years of age frequently mislocalized the initial stimulation
away
from their body to parts of the examiner's body
or into space (response f).
This phenomenon, known as exosomesthcsia,‘
persisted in some children despite repeated stimulations with the child's eyes open, and despite the
examiner's insistence that it was the child who had been touched.
Another phenomenon was seen during homolateral
testing. The child reported only the stimulus applied to the cheek. If the examiner asked insistently, “Did you feel another touch anywhere else?", a number of children hesitatingly pointed to the symmetrical point in the check on the opposite side
of the body. In order to determine whether this was a
unique or a systematic
phenomenon, tests of other body parts were carried out. In homolateral tests
of foot and hand, shoulder and hand, and cheek and foot, the
same phenomenon was observed. The child ﬁrst reported
only the foot, the shoulder or
the cheek—and then, when the examiner insisted on second
locus, pointed
a
to the opposite foot, shoulder or side of the face.
,Furthermore, in some young children the phenomenon appeared on
single
stimulation. Single stimuli applied to any body
were localized correctly.
part
If the examiner then insisted that there had been a-seeond
sti‘mulus,'the 'ch'ild— pointed hesitatingly to the symmetric part on the opposite side of the
body.
As already indicated, hand dominance
(responses (1 and e) was infrequent.
It was observed in 7 per cent of the errors on face-hand tests. In all
subjects
in whom it was apparent, subsequent trials of the face-hand
test manifested
the pattern of face dominance.
Relation of hand and foot: In tests of parts of the body other than the
face
and hand, the hand was always least dominant and the cheek the
most. Simultaneous tests of foot and hand, the foot-hand test, were introduced after the
initial ten trials of the face-hand test in most children. In the foot~hand
test,
foot dominance was apparent in 51
per cent of the responses (see table 2).
It was demonstrated by hand extinction, by displacement of hand stimuli
to
the foot, and by partial displacement to the thigh, knee and
leg.
-

_‘

_

_

.
.-

_-~qu.-.

‘

7

TABLE 2
FOOT-HAND TEST

_W&amp;-u.~.“.~w

(Touch Stimuli)
5......“

Stimulation

Total
Trials

..,

-_._...

is

a-

Bilateral
Ipsilateral

53
48

Correct
21

23

Foot
17
16

Responses
FootHand
Foot
1

3

10
3

Partial

Hand-

2
3

2
0

Ft.-Ft.

Hand

”ma—”Ayug.

..

.
A
..
r

M»~..-.._—t_..

I

Otlzcr stimuli: A small
group of children who made errors in tests
at varying intervals were examined with other cutaneous stimuli. repeated
Extinction
and displacement phenomena were present in face-hand tests
using pin prick,
repetitive pin prick and repetitive touch (rubbing) stimulations. \Vhile the
number of errors with these stimuli were fewer than with touch
stimuli, the

i

,

,_

'

�w“

o

a.

‘NHJa-w

'

32

.

NEUROLOGY

I

still apparent.
pattern of face dominance and hand extinction was

_

._

f

DISCUSSION

__

NM...

.

~‘ak

,..,~

....

-V~’W~¢-—/“A...

-Mww

,rw

‘r

f
,.

‘....-._..u-n-.

v“\——»\‘

‘.
&lt;

r

3

The ability to identify and localize simultaneous stimuli separated from
each other at some distance is a complex function which gradually develops
for many
during the first decade of life. It is a relatively unstable ability,
Focal
discriminations.
such
changes in the stateiof the organism can disturb
lesions,2
cord
lobe
lesions,2
spinal
cerebral disease as in hemiplegia" or parietal
and diffuse brain diseases such as toxic States, senility and inflammatory conditions" can so alter tactile discrimination that the phenomena of extinction,
and displacement become prominent. Errors in simultaneous tactile tests are
of the test—«luring the
apparent in normal adults during the initial few trials
of
doses
barbiturates," electroperiod of learning.1 TPersons subjected to large
such
inability.
shock therapy“ or anesthesia" also manifest
A prominent feature in all groups is the uniformity of face dominance.
When discrimination; of simultaneous stimuli is interfered with, for whatever
in the stimuli
reason, the errors are made in the stimuli to the hand and not
It, too,
extinction.”
is
"hand
dominance"
_to the face. The corollary of "face
Furstudied.
of
conditions
'is apparent in all subjects and under the variety
these
two
between
thermore, in an "order of dominance" other body parts are
mental
with
and
severe
patients
limits. Studies in patients with hemiplegia“
of dominance
order
revealed
have
disease“
an
of
brain
result
a
as
changes
other
these
body parts
of face—shouldcr-trunk-thigh-foot and hand. Insofar as
dominance
Since
observed.
order
similar
was
these
children,
in
a
studied
were
of
dominance is an
is evident in young children, it appears that the pattern
inherent function of the organism. This childlike way of responding to simultaneous tactile'stimuli is exposed and exaggerated in adults under a variety
of pathologic conditions.
has suggested a theory of rostral dominance to explain these
Recently
observations." Our observations are not in accord with such a theory. The
dominance of the foot to the hand in children, as well as the dominance of
with
penis, buttock, foot and thigh to the hand in two large series of patients
untenable.
such
make
explanation
an
diffuse brain dysfunction,“
Comparison of ﬁndings in normal children with ﬁndings in patients with
organic mental syndrome: On comparing the findings in children with these
previously reported in patients with severe mental changes due to brain dysfunction,6 a close similarity in performance is observed. In both groups the
ability to'discriminate simultaneous stimuli is limited. On non-homologous
tactile tests, such as the face-hand test, errors are made on initial and subdissequent trials.‘ While extinction of a stimulus is the most frequent error,
with
a
placement is eommon. In both children and patients, errors» occur
be
done
frequently
Furthermore,
stimuli.
cutaneous
testing
may
variety of
with eyes open, and in many instances with repeated verbal clues that there
of learning is not promare two stimuli, and still errors are made. The factor
the
elicit
will
patterned errors.
previous
days
on
subsequent
inent since testing

mgvﬁ

.

;
'

'

vb...“

..

,r»

...-

-,4‘-.;.,.va‘

.

A.

w,
..

~’M"|,.I

vauy—as

,
"
'

m-..

....

v
-....

*qu...‘

{U

thn

A

'

-....;..W"

A...

.‘-

"

"

"‘W

,

A

AA

i.

1
1»

1

1

1
l
i

‘

�PERCEPTION OF TACTILE STIMULI IN CHILDREN

‘

3‘3

In Gestalt terms, patients with organic mental defects and children have difficulty in extracting a complex sensory "figure” from the "background" of the
total sensory "field.” Significantly in each group there is no difficulty in identifying simultaneous stimuli if the stimuli are applied in symmetric regions
of the body, such as each hand or both sides of the face. Here, each stimulus
figure has a common background in tenns of body image. namely the hand.”
Face dominance is apparent in both groups. It is manifest not only on
tests of face and hand but also on tests of face and other body parts. Also,
insofar as it was tested, the order of dominance for other body parts is similar.
'
While extinction and displacement are the most frequent types of error,
other phenomena are elicited in both children and patients. Partial displacements, e. g., the mislocalization of the percept from the hand to the shoulder
or neck on the face-hand test, are occasionally observed. The phenomena of
allesthesia and exosomesthesia are seen in the more severely affected patients
and in the youngest children; both are frequently associated in the same subjeets. In allesthesia, the subjects ,usually localize the cheek stimulus correctly
but mislocalize the hand stimulus to the opposite hand or elbow. In exo~somesthesia,—the stimuli are mislocalized either to space in front of the subject
or to the examiner’s body. This phenomenon was frequent in the youngest
children, and despite the examiner’s urging that the child point to its own
body, the child persisted in such mislocalizations until a trial of the face-hand
test was performed with eyes open.
In addition to these phenomena which appear spontaneously, patients with
rganie mental syndrome also manifest another response to simultaneous stim.
ulation ﬁrst noted in children, i. e., on homolateral testing only one stimulus
(the cheek) is spontaneously reported; but when the examiner insists, the
second is mislocalized to the opposite cheek. Since the patients show so
many
similarities to young children in their responses, it was predicted that they
would also show this phenomenon. In a series of patients with severe mental
changes, homolateral tests of the cheek, hand, foot, shoulder and thigh were
applied. When only one stimulus was reported, the examiner asked for the
locus of the second stimulus. Responses were obtained in 20
per cent of the
patients, and in each one the second stimulus was mislocalized to the symmetric body part. Furthemiore, in some subjects the same phenomenon was
observed with single stimulation.
This phenomenon appears to be similar to the completion phenomenon
described in Gestalt literature as “closure" and “good continuation.” These
are usually described for other sensory modalities. \Vhen a circle is taehistoscopically exposed in the visual field so that half falls on a hemianopic field.
or if a cross is exposed so that the center falls in the blind spot, many subjects
report a complete circle or cross. This “completion” occurs for “good" figures.
In simultaneous tactile studies, symmetric figures appear to be the "good” or
"strong" figures.

R‘f.

,

»

—

“A...

.......~-........1

~

—

-

AI.-

jar-rs:

x
.,
r;'34

�l _‘

Amw—

9

,
..»—-w»4

‘-‘*V—~..

»

._......-.-...

Ms-

34

'1

CONCLUSIONS
1. Ability

,

NE U ROLOCY

,

to identify and localize asymmetric simultaneous tactile stimuli
develops gradually during the first decade of life, and is present in 80 per
cent of normal children by the age of eight. Symmetric stimuli are more
readily localized and this ability is well developed in normal three year old

children.
2. The errors on asymmetric (bilateral and ipsilateral) stimulation involve
either extinction (only one of the two stimuli is reported), or displacement
(one or both stimuli are mislocalizcd). Whenever extinction and displacement occur, stimuli to the face tend to be correctly reported. This face dom-’
inance is found at all age levels tested.
3. One can conclude that extinction and displacement of tactile stimuli,
well
as
as face dominance, constitute a normal and consistent pattern of rein
children. ,In addition to these responses one can observe, in chilsponse
dren under six years of age, the phenomena of allesthesia, exosomesthesia and
partial displacement as normal reactions to simultaneous tactile stimulation.
4. The difﬁculties in recognition of simultaneous tactile stimuli, as shown
by young children, reappear in the same fashion in adult patients with focal
or diiluse dysfunction of the brain. The abilities of tactile discrimination acquired by the child during growth are lost by the adult who develops mental
changes as a result of cerebral damage.
i

.

f

.
..

.-.-~vku-»~‘.

..

,

_

-

-

-

.

REF E1112. ’CES
M. B.; FINK, M., and GREEN, M.:
Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests
of face and hand, Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 75:
2'50, 1950; BENDER, M. B.; FINK, M., and
GREEN, M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand, Arch. Neurol.
&amp; l’sychiat. 662355, 1951.
BENDER, M. B.: Extinction and precipitation
of cutaneous. sensations, Arch. Neurol. 61
Psychiat. 54:1, 1945; Kora, L.: Observations on the somatic sensory extinction phenomenon and‘ the body scheme after unilateral resection of the posterior central gyrus,
Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 75: 1950.
BISNDER, M. 13.; WOR'I‘IS, S. 8., and CRAMER,
1.: Organic mental syndrome with phenomena of extinction and allesthesia, Arch. Neurol. 8t Psychiat. 59:27}, 1948.
SHAPIRO, M. F.; PINK, M., and BENDER,
M. 13.: Exosomesthesia, or the phenomenon
of displacement of sensation into extra-personal space, Arch. Neurol. 8t Psychiat. 68:481,

1.. BENDER,

-&lt;.»»N.-.~,.--~c¢-v--_.a

.
_

.
..

.,.....-._..a..-

.

..

.
.

1952.

’

M. 8.; SHAmno, M. F., and SCHAPPELL, A. W1: Extinction phenomenon in
hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. 61 Psychiat. 62:

. BENDER,
t
l
l
e
I

lbs: - 3w

1?, M . Q33. (TFGJN'zX’UwAaQ

,

i
l
l

5...”...

.

.

.

.

717, 1949.
FINK, M.; GREEN, M., and BENDER, M. 13.:
The face-hand test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome, Neurology 2:46,

.

r

1952.
JAFFE, J., and BENDER, M. B.:

Perceptual
patterns during recovery from general anesthesia, J. Neurol., Neurosurg. a Psychiat.
14:316,1951.
COHN, R., and Rum-:5, G. N.: On certain
aspects of the sensory organization of the
human brain: A study in rostral dominance
as determined by ipsilateral simultaneous
stimulation. Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 74:162,
1949. COHN, R.: On certain aspects of the
sensory organization of the human brain:
II. A study of rostral dominance in children,
Neurology 1:119, 1951.
GREEN, M., FINK, M., and BENDER, M. 3.:
Order of dominance in cutaneous perception.
Tr. Am. Neurol. A. In press.
JAFFB, 1., and BBNDER, M. 8.: The factor of
symmetry in the perception of two simultaneous cutaneous stimuli, Brain 75: part 2,
167-176, 1952.
,

.

l

..

.-

.-—-....

-~..—....-

__..

‘me—M

.

Mums—can

7—.

.

�PERCENT

OF GROUP

ERRORS

MAKING
03

U"

mo

O

_
m

u
ZCmeD

A
m

OT:

m
ﬁnch?

u
m

o........v..m.o

.

_i

2% (be; /C1{»c {ram

62'

(2»
,

—

x?

"55"” 512/

p

i

M1144};

ZI“:.Y&amp;A‘4

6A.,

1M (.4:

V7

“"'

c

/ d4

A

[7

5‘" r’,'.

:e

7§~&lt;1

593%“

75/075

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2344">
                <text>Perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli in normal children. Neurology. 1953 Jan; 3(1): 27-34. And, Spinal Fluid Findings Following Cerebral Angiography.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2345">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2346">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-8-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2347">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2348">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Bender, Morris B.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2349">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2350">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2351">
                <text>8 items. 1: Reprint from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, January, 1953, Vol.3, No.1. Read at the fourth annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Louis-ville, Kentucky, April 24. 2: [preprint] and graph. 3: Monthly Neurological Research Seminar, Nov. 27, 1951, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City. 4: Report of Activities. 5: 2 items - Spinal Fluid Findings Following Cerebral Angiography; Reprint from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol. 3, N0. 2 AND [preprint]. 6: Presentation at the Fourth Annual Meeting - American Academy of Neurology - April 24, 1952, Lousiville; presented to Dr. Costello, members, and guests of the Academy. 7: Xerox of Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in Normal Children.  8: graph.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2352">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2353">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74437">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80998">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87559">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94120">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="273" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="64">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/cd19f1b46d47e649344f387e918358a2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>402d7d717080af9c10d773a24db00fb9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100690">
                    <text>Reprinted from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No.

1,

Sept-Oct. 1959.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to
Electroshock Therapy
ROBERT L. KAHN,

PH.D., and MAX FINK, M.D.

In previous studies”,7 we found that patients who were most likely to improve from
electroshock treatment exhibited persistent
and relatively marked degrees of altered
brain function, as measured by the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital test for
brain disease.10 We reported, furthermore,7
that patients who improved with electroshock treatment had developed a language
pattern similar to- that previously described
by Weinstein and Kahn}3 in their studies of
neurological patients with cerebral dysfunction. Weinstein and Kahn described a language pattern which they called “language
of denial” and demonstrated the relationship
of this language pattern to the premorbid
personality of the patient.
On the basis of these observations, we assumed that the patients most likely to beneﬁt from electroshock treatment would be
those who most closely approximated the
“explicit verbal denial” personality.11
To test this hypothesis, we studied 63 consecutive patients referred for electroshock
therapy. The selection of patients for treatment was made by the psychiatric staff, independent of the judgment of the authors.
Thepatients ranged in age from 20 to 66,
with a mean of 47, and included 21 men and
42 women. Prior to and during treatment
each patient was evaluated according to the
following methods:
1. Structured Family Interviews: Personality was evaluated in interviews with members of the patient’s family. At the opening of the interview, the relative was asked
to describe, in his own words, the patient’s
usual interests and attitudes. The relatives
were encouraged to talk about any aspect
they wished, and the interviewer followed
the trend of their talk, rather than proceedFrom the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
Aided by grant M-927 of the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, United
States Public Health Service.
Presented at a meeting of Electroshock Research
Association, Chicago, 1957.

ing in a serial fashion. The interviewer
asked questions, however, to obtain information in 15 speciﬁc areas which have been
described as characteristic of the “explicit
verbal denial” personality. The number and;
type of questions required'with each relative
varied according to the degree of spontaneous production and the informant’s capacity to comprehend and communicate. The informant was encouraged to give concrete:
examples of all statements.
The patients were evaluated as to the pres
ence and extent of the following character
istics: whether they (1) stressed verbal
symbols such as resolutions, homilies, cliches-and rationalization; (2) were prestige and;
security conscious, and did not enjoy the in;
trinsic beneﬁts of health, work, leisure
money and property; (3) regarded illnéSs:
as an imperfection or disgrace, keeping it an; ,
secret from family and neighbors, and were
reluctant to seek medical care; (4) tended)
to “shake off” their own troubles and to be)
regarded as practical persons who advise,
others; (5) possessed much drive and coma
pulsive energy and felt guilty or uneasy if
not occupied; (6) were conscientious, with a
high sense of duty and responsibility; (7)
were sensitive to criticism, regarding it as
an attack on their integrity; (8) were proud
and tended to avoid help from others; (9)
were reserved rather than openly affectionate or emotional; (10) emphasized being correct; (11) lacked imaginativeness and creativity; (12) were not considered by their
relatives as dependent; (13) did not discuss
sex openly; (14) did not have temper outbursts; and (15) were not “ludic”—a term
taken from Piaget8 and used by Weinstein”
and Kahn12 to denote comic, tragic or melodramatic behavior.
After the interview, each item was rated
on a scale of O, 1 or 2. A score of O was
given if the aspect was noted to a minimal
degree; a score of 1 indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a
score of 2 indicated the deﬁnite and marked

,»

.

,

'

'

�'

presence of the pattern. The scores for each
item were added and, the resultant score
termed the “denial personality score.”
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was
interviewed prior to treatment and at weekly
intervals during and following the course of
treatment. The clinical evaluation was determined by the patient’s behavior in the
few weeks following the end of the course of
treatment, and was based on the evaluation
of the patient’s therapist, the therapist’s supervising psychiatrist and the supervising
psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock
treatment unit. Patients were classed into
three groups: much improved, moderately
improved, or unimproved, following the criteria outlined previouslyf‘
3. Language Study: In addition to. the

clinical interviews, each patient was examined with a standardized series of questions
directed at determining his attitude toward
his illness. Two of the questions asked were
“What is your main trouble?” and “If you
had one wish, what would you wish for?”
The patients were tested before and during
treatment, and the verbatim responses were
analyzed for changes in language, according
to the method previously described.7
Treatment for all patients consisted of
grand mal electroshock, using a Reiter elec—
trostimulator or a Medcraft alternating-current instrument, on a schedule of three treatments per week.
Of the 63 patients, we were able to- interview the relatives of 47; and the present
study refers to this group. The denial personality scores ranged from 0 to 25, with a
median of 11. For statistical comparison
the patients were divided into two groups.
Patients with scores ranging from 11 to 25
were considered the “high denial” group,
while those with scores from 0 to 10 were
classed as low in denial tendencies.
Personality Score and Clinical Response:
Patients with high denial personality scores
in these family interviews were most likely
to be rated as much improved, and only one
case was considered unimproved (Table I).
In patients with low scores, however, the
clinical response rating occurred on a chance
basis, with 30% of the patients being regarded as unimproved.
')
.«

TABLE I
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Response to Electroshoclc
Denial

Much

Personality Improved
Score
11 - 25
0 - 25

14

Total

Moderately
Improved Unimproved

Total

7

9
9

1
7

24
23

21

18

8

47

The difference in the denial scores between
the much and moderately improved patients,
when compared to the unimproved patients,
is statistically signiﬁcant (at 1% level of
conﬁdence by Mann-Whitney U Test). Although the much improved patients have a
higher mean score than the moderately improved group, this difference is not signiﬁcant.

Qualitative Observations: Although there
is a relationship between high personality
scores and the clinical rating, 30 per cent of
the patients with low denial scores were also
evaluated as showing a marked improvement.
While the group of seven patients is a small
one, certain common characteristics can be
described. Although these subjects lack the
competitive drive, prestige and security
needs of the high denial subjects, they show
a similar lack of creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically of their
own or others’ feelings. They relate to the
environment primarily by nonverbal forms
of communication. They are described by
their families as laughing or crying excessively and as showing anger by muteness—
“going into a shell,” “walking out of the
room in a huff”——or by violent tempers with
table-pounding, throwing objects or direct
physical assault.
Personality Score and Changes in Language: By means of the technique of language analysis described in a previous
study,7 the changes in language in clinical
interviews ~were compared with the denial
personality scores. Nine patterns of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or symptoms, displacement, qualiﬁcation, etc., have been described as characteristically occurring after electroshock. As in
the previous study, each patient was classiﬁed according to the dichotomy of whether

�.

qr nothe showed three or more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial
personality scores showed a greater number
of language changes than those with low
denial personality scores (Table II). The
coefﬁcient of correlation between the personality scores and the number of language
changes is +.71, signiﬁcant at better than
the 1% level of conﬁdence.
TABLE II
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Language Changes Daring Treatment
Denial
Personality Scores
11 - 25 (20)
0 - 10 (20)

N 0. Language Changes
0

—

2

3

or more

.................................. 8
.................................. 17

12

Total ........................................ 25

15

3

Illustrative Cases
Case 1. High Denial Personality Score: A 61-yearold housewife was admitted to the hospital with a
15—month history of insomnia, abdominal. pain and
fear of cancer. On admission she was depressed,
retarded and seclusive, evincing little interest in

her surroundings and wandering aimlessly about
the ward.
The patient was described by her husband as a
conscientious, dependable, responsible person with
much integrity. She had no hobbies or outside interests, and was unable to relax; as a consequence,
she busied herself with chores at home. She was
“mortally afraid” of doctors, minimized her illnesses and concealed ailments even from her husband. Very restrained, she showed no affection or
emotion, never discussed sex and rarely lost her
temper. She had “a long memory for little things
if she felt that she was wronged,” a “streak of stubbornness,” and would “just as soon hold another
person responsible for her mistakes.” She was proud
and would “rather go- without food” than borrow
or take money from others.
According to the denial criteria, her score was 20.
After 20 electroshock treatments, she became euphoric, took an interest in her personal appearance and participated in hospital activities. Her doctor called her a “model” patient who, “while reluctant to discuss her personal feelings, asserted
that she had no difﬁculties at home, had a wonderful husband who was very good to her, considered herself lucky and eagerly anticipated her discharge.” She was discharged with a rating of

“much improved.”
Case 2. Low Dental Personality Score: A 41year-old housewife was admitted to the hospital
with a two-year history of depression following the
birth of her fourth child. She cried frequently, lost
interest in social activities, found it increasingly
difﬁcult to take care of her baby and had suicidal

thoughts. On admission it was noted that the patient paid little attention to her personal appearance, cried readily, showed psychomotor retardation and was circumstantial in speech.
The patient was described by her husband as a
“negative personality” with whom it was not easy
to get along because she was opinionated and argumentative. He regarded her as “completely impractical, with no common sense.” She was a poor
housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other
people, although not the kind of person who would
put herself out for others. An excessively talkative
person, she liked to engage in long, intellectual, pretentious conversations. When angry, however, she
Would become either completely mute or “very
nasty, implying you just don’t know any better.”
Although considered a “cold” person, she was able
to talk freely about sex. She frequently complained of physical ailments and went to physicians
readily. She was “naive” and “unrealistic,” believing, for example, that she had a ﬂair for writing
although others considered her amateurish.
Her personality score was rated as 4.
The patient received 18 electroshock treatments,
which were terminated at her own insistence because she was too frightened to take any more. At
the time of her discharge her doctor noted her as
“quite depressed,” but felt it was doubtful that she
could beneﬁt from further treatment at the hospital.
She was discharged with the recommendation for
continued psychotherapy.

Discussion
The structured family interview was designed to test the Specific hypothesis derived from earlier observations that patients
with the “explicit verbal denial” personality
are most likely, with electroshock therapy,
to show both the language and behavioral
changes which are rated as much improved
by the examiner. The data support this hypothesis and are also consistent with the
theory of the mode of action of electroshock
therapy advanced by Weinstein, Linn and
Kahn in 1952.9 They suggest tha “. . . the
therapeutic eﬂicacy of electroconvulsive therapy . . . derives from the production of a.
state of brain function in which the mechanism of denial is facilitated in characterologically disposed individuals.”
The degree of explicit verbal denial is,
however, only one personality aspect affecting the behavioral response to treatment. On
the basis of the present data and methods of
analysis, a broader View of’ personality patterns in relation to improvement with EST
is now possible. Those patients who are
rated as clinically improved are character-

'

�8va

—

_

,r-Pff-‘wu

‘:_‘_":':'*'r‘-n-€"L

,V"-~.'

-:
&lt;

,2

ized as: (a) nonempathic—unable to think
critically or sensitively about the needs, feelings or communications of others; (b) nonintrospective—unable to think critically
about their own feelings or needs, or to
achieve insight even with the collaboration
of others in the psychotherapeutic relationship; (0) relying heavily on nonverbal communication—even when they are talkative
there is little referential communication, the
words being clichéd, stereotyped or representative of feelings and emotions rather than
transmitters of information; and (d) highly
conventional—without imaginative or creative capacity, and with few resources to deal
with stressful or new situations.
With this pattern as the common background, two classes of patients who respond
to treatment can be deﬁned: the driving, conscientious, independent, successful, emotionally controlled person who can be characterized as the “explicit verbal denial” personality type; and the chronically inadequate, affectively labile and ludic, dependent person, coming from an impoverished
sociocultural background. While both types
are rated as improved in their short-term
response to electroshock, preliminary followup observations indicate that the “explicit
verbal denial” personality type is more likely
to sustain the clinical response, while the
ludic group is likely to relapse quickly.
Consistent with our previous studies we
have found that altered brain function is a
necessary condition for behavioral change
with electroshock therapy. The kinds of behavioral change shown with altered brain
function, however, vary markedly in different patients. Some show mood changes and
denial or displacement of symptoms, and are
rated as improved. Others develop paranoid
agitated states, become withdrawn or show
additional somatic or memory complaints,
and are rated as unimproved. In this study
we have stressed the personality factors in
those cases whose behavioral response was
rated as improved. We have not considered the patients who were rated as only
moderately improved or unimproved. If the
basic hypothesis is correct, we should also
ﬁnd a relationship between personality and
the behavioral response in patients who are
rated as unimproved. Present information
4.:

in this regard is minimal, as this problem
has not been approached with a speciﬁc hy-“
pothesis.
These observations raise questions concerning the relation of personality to type
of mental illness and choice of therapy. Clinical observations support the concept of a
characteristic premorbid personality. Abraham1 noted that states of depression occur
in obsessional persons. Arnot2 described depressed patients as being overconscientious
and perfectionistic. Hamilton and Mann,5
reporting various aspects of the personality
in involutional depression, included such features as “followed a rigid pattern of behavior . . . displayed a lack of imagination . . .
narrow range of interest . . . thorough, conscientious, meticulous devotion to duty . . .
lack of feeling for point of view of others
. . . hard, uncompromising drivers . . . oversensitive . . reserved.” Cohen et al.,3 in
an intensive study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients as being
highly prestige conscious; little concerned
with problems of interpersonal relatedness;
stereotyped; conventional; having little capacity for communicative interchange; and
unaware of other persons’ feelings toward
them or of their feelings toward others. They
emphasized the patients’ inability to communicate verbally and suggested that the therapeutic relationship should be in nonverbal
terms rather than emphasizing the intellectual content of the exchange,
These studies of the personality background of depression show a pattern that
is most similar to those personality aspects
which have been described as the “explicit
verbal denial” personality. The factor of
personality could thus explain the fact that
depression is the condition that responds
best to electroshock treatment. The same
personality factors which make a person
susceptible to a depressive reaction are those
which make him responsive to nonverbal
forms of therapy. These factors enable him
to respond, under the conditions of altered
brain function, with those language and
other behavioral changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same stereotypy, conventionality, perfectionism and
prestige consciousness which produce a cat-

'

&gt;

�.'

respOnse in the individual faced
astrophic
7
With the loss, of a partner, job, business or
u'loiv‘ed one permit the development of denial,
minimization and displacement under the
conditions of altered brain function and are
deemed “improved” by the family and the
therapist.

Summary and Conclusions
To summarize, we believe that our results
show that aspects of personality can be differentiated, which are signiﬁcantly related
to the response to treatment. The basic personality pattern of the patients Who respond
best to electroshock treatment can be characterized as (a) nonempathic, (b) nonintrospective, (c) communicating nonverbally
and ((1) highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imaginative or creative capacity. Within the context of this common
care, there are two main subdivisions of improved patients. One group is comparable
with the “explicit verbal denial” personality,
showing such features as drive, conscientiousness, independence and emotional control. The other group consists of persons
apt to be chronically inadequate and dependent, coming from deprived sociocultural
backgrounds, who are affectively labile and
ludic. The same personality factors which
contribute to a depressive reaction contribute to a behavioral change, under the conditions of altered brain function following
electroshock therapy, which is evaluated as
improvement.

.
.
.

REFERENCES
Abraham, K.: Selected Papers on Psychoanalysis. (The Hogarth Press Ltd., London, 1949.)
Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality. Arch.
Neural. (G Psychiat, 76:617-618 (1956).
Cohen, M. B., et al.: An Intensive Study of
Twelve Cases of Manic—Depressive Psychosis.
Psychiatry, 17 :103-137 (1954).
Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG
Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electroshock. Arch. Neural. c6 Psychiat, 78:516-525,
1957.

10.

11.

12.

13.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Hoch, P., and Zubin, J. (eds.), Depression, pp.
199-209 (Grune d2 Strattan, New York, 1954).
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock. Arch. Neural. c6 Psychiat.,
76:23-29 (1956).
Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Hoch,
P., and Zubin, J. (eds), Psychopathology of
Communication, pp. 126.
Piaget, J .: Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood (W. W. N ortau, New York, 1951).
Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L., and Kahn, R. L.:
Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its
Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy. Am.
J. Psychiat, 109:22-26 (1952).
Weinstein, E. A., et al.: Diagnostic Use of Amo—
barbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Organic
Brain Disease. Am. J. Psychiat, 112:889-894
(1953).
Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Personality
Factors in Denial of Illness. Arch. Neurol. (Q
Psychiat, 69:355-367 (1953).
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugarman,
L. A.: Ludic Behavior in Patients with Brain
Disease. J. Hillside H08p., 3:98-106 (1954).
Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of
Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects.
(Charles 0'. Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill., 1955.)

'

��March 1957

£471.“.

Personality Factors in Behavioral

Response

to ElectroShock Therapy

Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D. and.Max Fink,

From
New

WW.

M.

D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,
York.

Aided by

M—92? of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
of Health, United States Public Health Service.

grant

Institutes

Presented to the Electroshock Research Association, Chicago,

l.

,

l,

,

,

gnu-H‘SVAmh-ﬁy,

May

1957.

�INTRODUCTION

The

behavioral response of patients receiving electroshock therapy

variable.
noted

In previous studies of the factors related to

that patients

who showed

is

this variability

early, persistent and relatively

we

marked degrees

of altered brain function, as meaSured by the electroencephalogram and the

amobarbital

test for brain disease (10),

were most

response which was rated as improved (h) (6) (7).

likely to
The

show a

clinical

present study is an

investigation of the role of personality in the behavioral response.

explicit hypothesis concerning this relationship has been derived

An

from previous

studies of the patterns of behavioral

change occurring with EST.

In an analysis of language changes

after electroshock (7),

patients

patterns as explicit denial of illness;

who develop such language

we

reported that

personal, Spatial and temporal displacement of symptoms; and qualification,
evasion and minimization are rated as improved. These language patterns are

similar to those previously described

by Weinstein and Kahn (13)

studies of neurological patients with cerebral dysfunction.

in their

They characteru

ized this behavior as the "language of denial" and demonstrated a relationship
to personality. In particular they described the characteristics of the "ex-

plicit verbal denial" personality (11).
the hypothesis was advanced

On

the basis of these Observations,

that those patients

this "explicit verbal denial" personality type
the behavioral changes
The purpose

after EST

who most

closely approximated

would be more

likely to

Show

which are rated as improved.

of the present study, therefore,

was

to determine:

1) whether personality characteristics related to the behavioral
reSponse to electroshock therapy can be differentiated; and
2) whether patients with greater "denial" tendencies are more likeLy

to

show

proved.

behavioral changes

after electroshock therapy

which are

rated as

imp

�~2~
POPULATION

Sixty-three consecutive patients referred for electroshock therapy were
studied. The selection of patients for treatment was made by the psychiatric

staff,

independent of the judgment of the authors. The patients ranged in age

from 20 to 66 with a mean of h7, and included 21 men and h2 women.
METHOD

Prior to treatment each patient

was evaluated according

to the following

methods:

1. Structured Family Interviews: Personality was evaluated in interviews with members of the patient's family. At the opening of the interview,
the relative was asked to describe, in his

interests

and

attitudes..

The

relatives

patient's usual
encouraged to talk about any

own

were

words, the

aSpect they wished, and the interviewer followed the trend of

rather than proceeding in a serial fashion.

The

their talk,

interviewer asked questions,

however, to obtain information in 15 Specific areas which have been described

as characteristic of the "explicit verbal denial" personality.
and type of questions required with each

The number

relative varied according to the de-

gree of spontaneous production and the informant's capacity to comprehend and
communicate. The informant was encouraged to give concrete examples of

all

statements.
The

basic items included the presence

features: 1) stress verbal

symbols such as

rationalization; 2) are prestige

and

and

extent of each of the following

resolutions, homilies, cliches

security conscious,

intrinsic benefits of health, work, leisure,

money and

it a

and

and do not enjoy the

property; 3) regard

secret from family

and

neighbors,-and are reluctant to seek medical care; h) "shake off" their

own

illness as

an imperfection or

disgrace, keeping

�-3troubles and are considered practical persons

who

advise others; 5) have

drive and compulsive energy, and are guilty or uneasy

if not

much

occupied; 6) are

conscientious with a high sense of duty and responsibility; 7) are sensitive

it

to criticism, regarding

as an attack on

their integrity;

8) are proud and

avoid help from others; 9) are reserved rather than openly affectionate or
emotional; 10) emphasize being correct; 11) are not imaginative or creative;
12) are not seen as dependent by

their relatives;

13) do not discuss sex

openly; 1h) do not have temper outbursts; 15) and are not ludic (25)

After the interview, each item was rated
score of

O

was given

if

on a

scale of

O, 1

or 2.

A

the aspect was noted to a minimal degree; a score of

1

indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a score of

2

indicated the definite

and marked presence of the

each item were added and the resultant score

pattern.

The

scores for

is termed the "denial personal-

ity score".
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was interviewed prior to and at
weekly intervals during and following the course of treatment. The

evaluation

was determined by

clinical

the patient's behavior in the few weeks follow-

ing the end of the course of treatment and was based

on

the evaluation of the

patient's therapist, the therapist's supervising psychiatrist and the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock treatment unit. Patients
were classed

into three groups:

proved, following the

much improved, moderately improved,

or unimp

criteria outlined previously (6).

3. lgnguagg §t_gy: In addition to the clinical interviews, each patient
was examined

toward his

with a standardized series of questions determining his attitude

illness.

Two

of the questions asked were,

"What

is your

main

trouble?" and ”If you had one wish, what would you wish for?" The patients
were

tested before

and during treatment and the verbatim reSponses were

anal-

ized for changes in language according to the method previously described (7).

�V

«hRESULTS

The

relatives of

scores ranged from

h?

patients

were interviewed.

to 25, with a

O

O

denial personality

statistical

comparison

Patients with scores ranging

from

25 were consiRered the "high denial" group, while those with scores from

to
to

For

median of 11.

the patients were divided into two groups.
11

The

10 were classed as low

in denial tendencies.
Patients with high denial

1. Personality score and clinical reSponse:

personality scores in these family interviews were most likely to

be

as much improved, and only one case was considered unimproved (Table

patients with
a chance

30%

I). In

clinical reSponse rating occurred

low scores, however, the

basis, with

rated
on

of the patients being regarded as unimproved.

I

TAJLE

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical Response to Electroshock
Moderately

Much

Unimproved

Total

9

1

2h

9

7

23

18

8

h?

Improved

Improved

Personality Score

-

25

1h

0 ~ 10

7

11

Total

.

21
The

proved

difference in the cenial scores between the

patients,

significant.

%

when compared

to the

unimproved

much and moderately im-

patients is statistically

Although the much improves patients have a higher mean score

than the moderately improved group, this Jifference is not significant.
2. Qualitative observations:

Although there

is a relationship between

high denial personality scores she the clinical rating,
low

denial scores

* Significant at
‘1

30%

of patients with

were also evaluated as showing a marked improvement. 'Hhile
1%

.0 '
level of coniidence

by HannAWhitney

U

Test.

�-5the group of seven patients
be described.
and

security

is

a small one,

certain

common

characteristics

can

Although these Subjects lack the competitive drive, prestige
ne ds of the high

denial subjects, they

show a

similar lack of

creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically of their own
or other's feelings» They relate to the environment primarily by non-verbal
forms of communication. They are described by

their families as laughing or

crying excessively; and as showing anger by muteness, "go into a shell," "walk
out of the room in a huff," or bv violent tempers with table-pounding, throwing

objects or direct physical assault.

patients are "ludic," - a term used

These

by Heinstein and Kahn (12) to denote comic,

tragic, or melodramatic behavior.*

3.

Personality score and changes in language: Applying the technic of
language analysis described in a previous study (7), the changes in language
in clinical interviews

were compared with

the denial personality scores.

patterns of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or

Nine

symptoms,

displacement, qualification, 323' have been described as characteristically
occurring after electroshock.

As

in the previous study, each patient

was

classified according to the dichotomy of whether or not he showed three or
more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial personality scores
showed a

greater

ality scores
ality scores

number of language changes, than those with low

(Table

II).

The

denial persen-

coefficient of correlation between the person-

and the number of language Chan es

is

+

.71, significant at better

than the 15 level of confidence.

* This terizwas taken from Piaget
behavior of young children (8).

who

pplied

it

to the play

and

imitative

�-6-

II

TABLE

Relation of Denial Personality Dcores to Clinical Language Changes During
Treatment
Number Language Changes

-

0

2

3

or more

Personality Scores
11-25

(20)

8

12

0-10

(20)

17

3

Total

25

15

h. Illustrative Cases:
Case 1.
A

month

High Denial

Personality Score:

élayear-old houswife

was

history of insomnia, abdominal nain

admitted to the hospital with a 15
and

fear of cancer.

she was depressed, retarded, and seclusive, evincing

On

admission

little interest

in her

surroundin s, and uaneering aimlessly about the ward.
The

patient was described

responsible person with
and was unable to
home.

She was

much

relax.

by her husband as a conscientious, dependable,

integrity.

She had no

As a conseguence, she

hobbies, outside interests,

busiee herself with chores

at

"mortallv afraid" of doctors, minimized her illnesses and con-

cealed ailments, even from her husband. Very restrained, she onenly showed
no

affection or emotion, never 6iscusse€ sex

had "a long memory

for

little

"streak of stubborness,"
sible for her mistakes."
than borrow or take

things

and would

if

she

and

felt that

According to the denial

She

she was wronged," a

"just as soon hold another person

She was proud ane would

money from

rarely lost her temper.

"rather

go

reSponu

without food"

others.

criteria, hrr score was

20.

After 20 electroshock treatments, she became euphoric, took an interest
in her personal appearance and participated in hospital

activities.

Her doctor

�-7called her a

"model"

patient

feelings, asserted that
band who was very good

her discharge."

who, "while

reluctant to discuss her personal

difficulties at home, had a wonderful husto her, considered herself lucky and eagerly anticipated
she had no

She was discharged with a

Case 2.

Low

"much improved."

Denial Personality Score:

hl-year-old housewife

A

rating of

was

admitted to the hOSpital with a two

year history of depression following the birth of her fourth child. She cried

frequently, lost interest in social activities, found it increasingly difficult
to take care of her baby and had suicidal thoughts. On admission the patient
was

showed

attention to her personal appearance, cried readily,
psychomotor retardation and was circumstantial in speech.

The
whom
He

little

noted to pay

patient

it was

was described by

her husband as a "negative personality" with

not easy to get along because she was opinionated and argumentative.

regarded her as "completely impractical, with no

common

sense."

She was a

poor housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other people, although not

the kind of person

who would

ative person, she liked to
sations.

When

put herself out for others.

engage

An

excessively talk-

in long, intellectual, pretentious converu

angry, however, she would become either completely mute, or

"very nasty, implying you just don‘t
"cold" person, she was able to

know any

better." Although considered a

talk freely about sex.

She

frequently complained

of physical ailments and went to physicians readily. She was "naive" and "un-

realistic," believing, for

example,

that she had a flair for writing although

others considered her amateurish.

rated as h.

Her

personality score

The

patient received eighteen electroshock treatments, which were term»

inated at her

was

frightened to take any more,,
At the time of her discharge her doctor noted her as "quite depressed," but felt

that

ital.

it was

own

insistence because she

was too

doubtful that she could benefit from further treatment at the hosp-

She was discharged with

the recommendation for continued psychotherapy.

�-8-

.

DISCUSSION

The

structured family interview

was designed

to test the specific

hypo—

thesis derived from earlier observations that patients with the "explicit
verbal denial" personality are most likely to
havioral

Changes

the examiner.

show

both the language and be-

to electroshock therapy which are rated as

The

data supports this hypothesis

and

much improved by

is also consistent with

the theory of the mode of action of electroshock therapy advanced by'Weinstein,

that "....the therapeutic efficacy of
electroconvulsive therapy....derives from the production of a state of brain

Linn and Kahn in 1952 (9).

They suggest

function in which the mechanism of denial

is facilitated in characterologically

disposed individuals."
The degree of

explicit verbal denial is, however, only

aspect affecting the behavioral reaponse to treatment.

one

personality

the basis of the

On

present data and methods of analysis a broader view of personality patterns
in relation to improvement with

rated as clinically
empathic

-

~

improved are

unable to think

EST

is

now

possible.

Those

own

who

are

characterized by such features as: 1) non-

critically or sensitively

about the needs,

ings, or communications of others; 2) non-intrOSpective

critically about their

patients

-

—

feel-

unable to think

feelings or needs; unable to achieve insight even

with the collaboration of others in the psychotherapeutic relationship; 3) rely
heavily on nondverbal Communication

little referential

--

even.when they are

communication, the words being cliched, stereotyped, or

.representative of feelings

and emotions

action and h) highly conventional .. ..

rather than transmitters of informp

withoutimaginative or creativecapacity,

y'and,with few resources to deal with stressful or
With

talkative there is

this pattern as the

common

new

situations.

background, two classes of patients who

"‘respond to treatment can.be-defined: a) the driving,.conscientious, independent,

�.9can be

successful, emotionally-controlled person who

plicit verbal denial" personality type;

b) the chronically inadequate,
coming from an impoverished

ively labile and ludic, dependent person,
cultural background.

characterized as the "ex-

'While both types are

rated as

improved

affectsocio-

in their short

term reSponse to electroshock, preliminary follow-up observations indicate

that the "explicit verbal denial" personality type is more likely to sustain
the clinical reSponse, while the ludic group is likely to relapse quickly.
Consistent with our previous studies

we

have found that altered brain

function is a necessary condition for behavioral change'with electroshock
therapy.

The

kinds of behavioral change

shown with

however, vary marcedly in

different patients.

denial or diSplacement of

symptoms and

paranoid agitated states,

become withdrawn,

altered brain function,

Some show mood

changes and

are rated as improved. Others develop
or

show

ory complaints, and are rated as unimproved. In

additional somatic or

memp

this study we have stressed

the personality factors in those cases whose behavioral reSponse was rated as
improved. We have not considered the patients who were rated as only moder-

ately improved or unimproved. If the basic hypothesis is correct, we should
also find a relationship between personality and the behavioral response in
patients who are rated as unimproved. Present information in this regard is
minimal, as
These

this problem has not been approached with a specific hypothesis.
observations raise questions concerning the relation of personality

to type of mental illness

and choice of therapy.

Clinical observations support

the concept of a characteristic predepressed personality. Abraham (1) noted
of depression occurred in obsessional persons. Arnot (2) describes
that

states

depressions as being overly Conscientious and perfectionistic. Hamilton and
Mann (5), reporting various aSpects of the personality in involutional depress-

ion, include such features as "followed a rigid pattern of behavior....dis~
played a lack of imagination...narrou range of interestS..thorough, conscientious,

�.10..
meticulous devotion to duty...1ack of feeling for point of view of
others...
hard, uncompromising drivers...oversensitive...reserved." Cohen, §t_§l'(3)

in an intensive study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients
as being highly prestige-conscious; little concerned with problems of interpersonal relatedness; stereotyped; conventional; having
communicative interchange; and unaware of

self or of his feelings toward others.
to
be

little

capacity for

other persons' feelings toward him-

They emphasized the

patients' inability

that the therapeutic relationship should
in non-verbal terms rather than emphasizing the intellectual contents of
communicate

verbally

and Suggested

the exchange.

studies of the personality background of depression Show a pattern
that is most similar to those personality aspects whidh have been described
These

as the "explicit verbal denial" personality. The factor of personality could
thus explain the fact that depression is the condition which responds best
to electroshock treatment. The same personality factors which make a
person
susceptible to a depressive reaction are those which make him responsive to
non-verbal forms of therapy.

These

factors enable

him

to reSpond, under the

conditions of altered brain function, with those language and other behavioral
changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same stereotypy, convention-

ality, perfectionism,

and

prestige-consciousness, which produce a catastrophic
response in the individual faced by the loss of a partner, job, business, or

loved one permit the development of denial, minimization and displacement
under the conditions of altered brain function and are deemed "improved" by

the family and the therapist.

�.11SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1.

Personality factors in

63

consecutive patients referred for e1ectro~

shock therapy were studied by means of a structured family interview.

2.
which are

3.
be

The

results

show

that aspects of personality can be differentiated

significantly related to the reaponse to treatment.
The

basic personality pattern of the patients

who respond

characterized as a) non-empathic, b) non-introspective, c)

non-verbally, and d) highly conventional and stereotyped, with

best can

communicate

little imagin-

ative or creative capacity.
h.

‘Within the context of

of improved

personality,

patients.

One

showing such

and emotional

control.

ically inadequate
grounds, uho are

this

group

is

core, there are two main subdivisions
comparable to the "explicit verbal denial"

common

features as drive, conscientiousness, independence

The oﬂaer group

and dependent, coming

consists of persons apt to be chron—
from deprived Socio-cultural back-

effectively labile and ludic.

5. The relationship between these personality patterns and descriptions
of the personality of depressed perSOns

is noted.

The same

personality factors

which contribute to a depressive reaction, contribute to a behavioral change
under the conditions of
which

altered brain function following electroshock therapy

is evaluated as improvement.

�.12..
FERENCES

1. Abraham, K.: Selected Papers on Psychoanalysis. London:
Press Ltd., 19h9.
Arnot, R.:

The

chiat.,

3. Cohen,

h. Fink,

Predepressed Personality,

Zé: 617—618, 1956.

A.M.A. Arch.

The Hogarth

Neurol.

&amp;

Psy-

B., Baker, G., Cohen, R. A., FrommpReichmann, F. and Ueigert,
An Intensive Study of Twelve Cases of Manic-Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiat., 11: 103-137, l95h.
H.

E. V.:
M.

and Kahn, R. L.:

Quantitative Studies of Slow wave Activity
EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., Q; 158, 1956.

Following Electroshock,

Hamilton, D. M. and Mann, W. A.: The Hospital Treatment of Involutional
Psychosos, in Depression (Hoch, P. and Zubin, J., eds.), New York:
Grune &amp; Stratton, 199-209, 1952.

L., Fink, M. and weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

Kahn, R.

7.

Language During Electroshock
Communication
(Hock, P. and Zubin,
Psychopathology of

Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M.:

Therapy, in

Changes

in

Eds.) in press.

Piaget, J.: Play,

Norton, 19 51.

Dreams and

Imitation in Childhood.

New

J.,

York: N. W.

9. Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R. L.: Psychosis During Electroshock
Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy, Am. J. Pey-

chiat.,

193; 22-26, 1952.

10. ‘Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A. and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Sodium") in Organic Brain Disease, Am. J. Psychiat., 11g} 889-89h, 1953.
11.

E. A. and Kahn, R. L.:
Arch. Neurol. &amp;
A.M.A.
ness,

neinstein,

Personality Factors in Denizl of
Psychiat., éﬁ: 355-367, 1953.

Ill-

12. Ueinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L. and Sugarman, L. A.: Ludic Behavior in
Patients with Brain Disease, J. Hillside Hosp., 2; 98-106, l95h.
13. Ueinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.:

Denial of

siological Aspects. Springfield,

Ill.:

Illness: Symbolic and Phy-

Charles C. Thomas, 1955.

�--.f\

._

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. and

From

Max

Fink,

M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
Aided by grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental
Health, National Institutes of Health, United States Public
Health Service.
Presented to the Electroshock Research Association, Chicago,
May

5/59

195”.

�INTRODUCTION

.The behavioral response of patients receiving electro—
shock therapy is variable. In previous studies of the

factors related to this variability we noted that patients
who showed early, persistent and relatively marked degrees
of altered brain function, as measured by the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital
most

likely to

show a

test for brain disease (10),

clinical response

were

rated as
investigation

which was

present study is an
of the role of personality in the behavioral response.
An eXplicit hypothesis concerning this relationship has
been derived from previous studies of the patterns of
behavioral change occurring with EST. In an analysis of
language changes after electroshock (7), we reported that

improved (h) (6) (7).

The

develop such language patterns as explicit
denial of illness; personal, spatial and temporal displacement
of symptoms; and qualification, evasion and minimization
are rated as improved. These language patterns are similar
to those previously described by Weinstein and Kahn (13)
in their studies of neurological patients with cerebral
dysfunction. They characterized this behavior as the

patients

who

"language of denial" and demonstrated a relationship to
personality. In particular they described the characteristics
of the "explicit verbal denial" personality (11). On the

basis of these observations, the hypothesis

was advanced

that

�-2-

closely approximated this "explicit
verbal denial" personality type would be more likely to
those patients
show

who most

the behavioral changes after

EST

which are rated as

improved.

purpose of the present study, therefore, was to
determine:
The

-

1) whether personality characteristics related to the
behavioral response to electroshock therapy can be differ-

entiated;

and

2) whether

patients with greater "denial" tendencies

are more likely to show behavioral changes after electroshock
therapy which are rated as improved.
EQPULATION:

Sixty-three consecutive patients referred for electroshock therapy were studied. The selection of patients for
treatment was made by the psychiatric staff, independent
of the judgment of the authors. The patients ranged in age
from 20 to 66 with a mean of h7, and included 21 men and h2
women.
METHOD

Prior to treatment each patient

was

evaluated according

to the following methods:

Structured Family Interviews: Personality was
evaluated in interviews with members of the patient's
family. At the opening of the interview, the relative was
1.

�-3asked to describe, in his

interests

and

attitudes.

own

words, the

The

relatives

patient's usual
were encouraged

to

aspect they wished, and the interviewer
followed the trend of their talk, rather than proceeding
in a serial fashion. The interviewer asked questions,
however, to obtain information in 15 specific areas which
have been described as characteristic of the "eXplicit
verbal denial" personality. The number and type of questions
required with each relative varied according to the degree
of spontaneous production and the informant's capacity to

talk about

any

comprehend and communicate.

The

informant was encouraged to

give concrete examples of all statements.
The basic items included the presence and extent of
1) stress verbal symbols
each of the following features:

resolutions, homilies, cliches and rationalization;
2) are prestige and security conscious, and do not enjoy the
intrinsic benefits of health, work, leisure, money and
such as

regard illness as an imperfection or disgrace,
keeping it a secret from family and neighbors, and are
reluctant to seek medical care; h) "shake off" their own
troubles and are considered practical persons who advise
5) have much drive and compulsive energy,.and are
others;
guilty or uneasy if not occupied; 6) are conscientious

property;

3)

with a high sense of duty and responsibility; 7) are
sensitive to criticism, regarding it as an attack on their

�-u-

integrity; 8) are

proud and avoid help from others;

9) are

reserved rather than openly.af£ectionate or emotuonal;
10) emphasize being

correct; 11) are not imaginative or

creative; 12) are not seen as dependent

by

their relatives;

not discuss sex openly; 1h) do not have temper
outbursts; 15) and are not ludic (25).
After the interview, each item was rated on a scale of
0, 1 or 2. A score of O was given if the aspect was noted

13)

do

to a minimal degree; a score of 1 indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a score of 2 indicated
the definite and marked presence of the pattern. The scores

for each item were added and the resultant scoretns termed
the "denial personality score".
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was interviewed
prior to and at weekly intervals during and following the
course of treatment. The clinical evaluation was determined
by the

patient's behavior in the

few weeks following the end

of the course of treatment and was based on the evaluation
of the patient's therapist, the therapist’s supervising
psychiatrist and the supervising psychiatrist in charge of
the electroshock treatment unit.

into three groups:

much improved,

unimproved, following the

Patients

were

classed

moderately improved, or

criteria outlined previously (6).

Study; In addition to the clinical inter~
views, each patient was examined with a standardized series
3. Language

�-5of questions determining his attitude toward his illness.
Two of the questions asked were, "What is your main trouble?"

"If you had one wish, what would you wish for?" The
patients were tested before and during treatment and the
verbatim responses were analyzed for changes in language
and

according to the method previously described (7).

�-6RESULTS

relatives of

interviewed. The
denial personality scores ranged from O to 25, with a median
of 11. For statistical comparison the patients were divided
into two groups. Patients with scores ranging from 11 to 25
were considered the "high denial" group, while those with
scores from O to 10 were classed as low in denial tendencies.
1. Personality score and clinical response: Patients
with high denial personality scores in these family interviews
The

likely to

were most

patients

h?

rated as

be

were

only one
case was considered unimproved (Table I). In patients with
low scores, however, the clinical response rating occurred
on a chance basis, with 30% of the patients being regarded as
much improved, and

unimproved.
TABLE

I

Relation of Denial Personality to Clinical Response
to Electroshock

Much

Moderately

25

1h

9

1

2h

to 10
Total

7

9

7

23

21

18

8

h?

Improved

Improved

Total

Unimproved

Personality Score
11
0

to

The

difference in the denial scores between the

and moderately improved

unimproved
*

patients,

when compared

much

to the

patients is statistically significant.* Although

Significant at

1%

level of confidence

by Mann-Whitney

U

Test.

�-7the much improved patients have a higher mean score than
the moderately improved group, this difference is not

significant.
Qualitative observations: Although there is a
relationship between high denial personality scores and the
clinical rating, 30% of patients with low denial scores were
also evaluated as showing a marked improvement. While the
2.

group of seven

patients is

characteristics

a small one,

can be described.

certain

common

Although these subjects

lack the competitive drive, prestige and security needs of
the high denial subjects, they show a similar lack of
creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically
of their own or other's feelings. They relate to the environment

primarily

by non-verbal forms of communication.

They

are described by their families as laughing or crying
excessively; and as showing anger by muteness, "go into a
shell," "walk out of the room in a huff," or by violent
tempers with table—pounding, throwing objects or direct

physical assault.

These

patients are "ludic," -

by Weinstein and Kahn (12)

a term used

to denote comic, tragic, or

melodramatic behavior.*
3.

Personality score

and changes in language:

Applying

the technic of language analysis described in a previous study
(7), the changes in language in clinical interviews were

the denial personality scores. Nine patterns
of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or

compared with

* This

and

term was taken from Piaget

imitative behavior of

young

applied it to the play
children (8).

who

�-8displacement, qualification, 323. have been
described as characterically occurring after electroshock.
As in the previous study, each patient was classified
according to the dichotomy of whether or not he showed three
or more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial
symptoms,

personality scores

showed a

greater number of language changes,

personality scores (Table II).
The coefficient of correlation between the personality scores
and the number of language changes is + .71, significant at
better than the 1% level of confidence.
than those with low denial

TABLE

II

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical
Language Changes During Treatment

Number Language Changes
0 - 2

Personality Scores
11-25
0-10

(20)
(20)

'

Total
h.

Illustrative

3

or more

8

12

1?

3

25

15

Cases:

gigh Denial Personality Score;
A 61-year-old housewife was admitted to the
hospital with a 15 month history of insomnia, abdominal pain
and fear of cancer. On admission she was depressed, retarded,
and seclusive, evincing little interest in her surroundings,
Case 1.

aimlessly about the ward.
The patient was described by her husband as a
conscientious, dependable, responsible person with

and wandering

much

�-9-

integrity.

hobbies, outside interests, and was
a consequence, she busied herself with

She had no

unable to relax. As
chores at home. She was “mortally afraid" of doctors,
minimized her illnesses and concealed ailments, even from
her husband.

Very

restrained,

she openly showed no

affection

rarely lost her temper. She
had "a long memory for little things if she felt that she was
wronged," a "streak of stubborness," and would "just as soon hold
or emotion, never discussed sex and

another person reaponsible for her mistakes." She was proud and
would "rather go without food" than borrow or take money from

others.
According to the denial

criteria,

her score was 20.

electroshock treatments, she became euphoric,
took an interest in her personal appearance and participated in
hospital activities. Her doctor called her a "model" patient
who, "while reluctant to discuss her personal feelings, asserted
After

that she

20

had no

difficulties at

home, had a

wonderful husband

very good to her, considered herself lucky and eagerly
anticipated her discharge." She was discharged with a rating

who was

of "much improved."

Denial Personality Score:
A hl-year—old housewife was admitted to the hospital
with a two year history of depression following the birth of
her fourth child. She cried frequently, lost interest in social
aetivities, found it increasingly difficult to take care of her
Case 2.

Low

suicidal thoughts. On admission the patient was
noted to pay little attention to her personal appearance, cried
baby and had

�readily,

showed psychomotor

retardation

and was

circumstantial

in speech.

patient was described by her husband as a "negative
personality" with whom it was not easy to get along because
The

she was

opinionated and argumentative.

He

regarded her as

"completely impractical, with no common sense." She was a
poor housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other people,
although not the kind of person who would put herself out for

others.

excessively talkative person, she liked to engage
in long, intellectual, pretentious conversations. When angry,
An

either completely mute, or "very
Just don't know any better." Although

however, she would become

nasty, implying you

considered a "cold" person, she was able to talk freely about
sex. She frequently complained of physical ailments and went
to physicians readily. She was "naive" and "unrealistic,"
believing, for example, that she had a flair for writing although
others considered her amateurish.

personality score was rated as h.
The patient received eighteen electroshock treatments,
which were terminated at her own insistence because she was
Her

too frightened to take any more. At the time of her discharge
her doctor noted her as "quite depressed," but felt that it

doubtful that she could benefit from further treatment at
the hospital. She was discharged with the recommendation for

was

continued psychotherapy.

�-11-

Elialﬁilgli

structured family interview was designed to test
the specific hypothesis derived from earlier observations
that patients with the "explicit verbal denial" personality
The

are most likely to show both the language and behavioral
changeswﬁﬂxelectroshock therapy which are rated as much

data supports this hypothesis
and is also consistent with the theory of the mode of action
of electroshock therapy advanced by Weinstein, Linn and Kahn
in 1952 (9). They suggest that "....the therapeutic efficacy
of electroconvulsive therapy....derives from the production
of a state of brain function in which the mechanism of denial
improved by the examiner.

The

is facilitated in characterologically disposed individuals."
degree of eXplicit verbal denial is, however,
only one personality aspect affecting the behavioral response
to treatment. 0n the basis of the present data and methods
The

of analysis a broader view of personality patterns in relation
to improvement with EST is now possible. These patients who
are rated as clinically improved are characterized by such
features as: l) non-empathic - - unable to think critically
or sensitively about the needs, feelings, or communications
of others; 2) non-introspective ~ - unable to think critically
about their own feelings or needs; unable to achieve insight
even with the collaboration of others in the psychotherapeutic

rely heavily on non-verbal communication they are talkative there is little referential

relationship;
even when

3)

-

�-12communication, the words being cliched, stereotyped, or

representative of feelings and emotions rather than transmitters of information and h) highly conventional - - without
imaginative or creative capacity, and with few resources to
deal with stressful or
With

new

situations.

this pattern as the

common

background, two classes

patients who respond to treatment can be defined: a) the
driving, conscientious, independent, successful, emotionallycontrolled person who can be characterized as the "explicit
verbal denial" personality type; b) the chronically
inadequate, effectively labile and ludic, dependent person,
coming from an impoverished sociocultural background. While
both types are rated as improved in their short term response
to electroshock, preliminary follow-up observations indicate
that the "explicit verbal denial" personality type is more
likely to sustain the clinical response, while the ludic group
is likely to relapse quickly.
of

Consistent with our previous studies we have found that
altered brain function is a necessary condition for behavioral
change with electroshock therapy. The kinds of behavioral change
slacwn with altered brain function, however, vary markedly in
different patients. Some show mood changes and denial or
displacement of symptoms and are rated as improved. Others
develop paranoid

agitated states,

withdrawn, or show
additional somatic or memory complaints, and are rated as
unimproved. In this study we have stressed the personality
become

�-13-

factors in those cases
as improved.

We

whose

behavioral response

have not considered the

patients

was

rated

who were

rated as only moderately improved or unimproved. If the
basic hypothesis is correct, we should also find a relation~
ship between personality and the behavioral reSponse in
patients who are rated as unimproved. Present information in

this regard is

minimal, as

this

problem has not been approached

with a specific hypothesis.

observations raise questions concerning the relation
of personality to type of mental illness and choice of therapy.
Clinical observations support the concept of a characteristic
These

predepressed personality. Abraham (I) noted that states of
depression occurred in obsessional persons. Arnot (2)
describes depressions as being overly conscientious and perfectionistic. Hamilton and Mann (5), reporting various aspects
of the personality in involutional depression, include such

features as "followed a rigid pattern of behavior.... diaplayed
a lack of imagination... narrow range of interests.. thorough,
conscientious, meticulous devotion to duty...lack of feeling
for point of view of others...hard, uncompromising drivers...

intensive
study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients

oversensitive...reserved."

Cohen, sﬂngg (3) in an

as being highly prestige-conscious;
problems of

little

concerned with

interpersonal relatedness; stereotyped; conventional;

little

capacity for communicative interchange; and
unaware of other persons’ feelings toward himself or of his

having

�~1h-

feelings toward others;

They emphasized the

inability to

verbally

communicate

therapeutic relationship should

be

patients'

that the
in non-verbal terms rather

and suggested

than emphasizing the intellectual contents of the exchange.
These studies of the personality background of depression
show a pattern that is most similar to those personality

"explicit verbal
personality. The factor of personality could thus
the fact that depression is the condition which responds
electroshock treatment. The same personality factors
which make a person susceptible to a depressive reaction are
aspects
denial"
explain
best to

which have been described as the

those which make him responsive to non-verbal forms of therapy.
These factors enable him to respond, under the conditions of
altered brain function, with those language and other behavioral
changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same

stereotypy, conventionality, perfectionism, and prestigeconsciousness, which produce a catastrOphic response in the
individual faced by the loss of a partner, job, business, or
loved one permit the development of denial, minimization and
displacement under the conditions of altered brain function
and are deemed "improved" by the family and the therapist.

�-15SQMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1. Personality factors in 63 consecutive patients
referred for electroshock therapy were studied by means of
a structured family interview.
2. The results show that aspects of personality can be
differentiated which are significantly related to the reSponse
.

to treatment.

basic personality pattern of the patients who
respond best can be characterized as a) non-empathic,
b) non-introspective, c) communicate non-verbally, and
d) highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imaginative
or creative capacity.
h. Within the context of this common core, there are
two main subdivisions of improved patients. One group is
comparable to the Wkplicit verbal denial" personality, showing
such features as drive, conscientiousness, independence and
emotional control. The other group consists of persons apt to
3.

The

chronically inadequate and dependent, coming from deprived
sociocultural backgrounds, who are effectively labile and Indie.
5. The relationship between these personality patterns and
descriptions of the personality of depressed persons is noted.
The same personality factors which contribute to a depressive
reaction, contribute to a behavioral change under the conditions
of altered brain function following electroshock therapy which
is evaluated as improvement.
be

�116REFERENCES

1.

Abraham, K.: SelecteguPaﬁers on
The Hogarth Press Ltd.,‘l9h9.

2.

Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
and Psychiat., 1g: 617f618, 1956.
Cohen, M.B., Baker, 6., Cohen, R.A., Fromm-Reichmann, F.
and Weigert, E.V.: Antintensive Study of Twelve Cases
Psychosis, Psychiat., 11: 103-137,
1ofsﬁanic-Depressive
9

3.

Psychoanalysis. London:

5

o

R.L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave
Activity Following Elastroshock, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol.,
g: 158, 1956.

Fink,

M.

Hamilton,

and Kahn,

The_Hospita1 Treatment of

D.M. and Mann, W.A.:

Involutional Ps choseg, in Depression (Hash,

J.,
6.

933.5,

New

Stratton,

FT and

Zubin,

199-209, 1952.

and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of
Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock,

Kahn, R.L., Fink,
A.M.A. Arch.

7.

York: Grune E
M.

Neurol.

&amp;

Egychiat., lé‘ 23-29, 1956.

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electro—
shock Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communication (Hoch,
Zubin, J., eds.) New York: Grune &amp; Stratton, 1958,
P.6and
12 ~139.
ﬁ

J.: Play)
York: W.W.

Piaget,
9.

Norton,

l9Sl.

Imitation in Childhood.

New

Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During
Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of
Shock Therapy,

10.

Dreams and

Am.

J. Psychiat., 109: 22-26, 1952.

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, L.:
Diagnostic Use of Amobarbitai Sodium ("Amytal Sodium")
Am.
inSOrganic Brain Disease, ""‘ J. Psychiat., 112: 889-89h,
19 3.

11;

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.:’Personality Factors in
Denial of Illness, A.M.A. ArCh. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., £2:
355-367, 1953.

12:

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Sugarman, L.A.* Ludic
Behavior in Patients with Brain Disease, J. Hillside Hosp.
2: 98-106, 195h.
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic
and Physiological Aspects. Springfiél’, 111.: Charles
i

13.

UT

Thomas, 1955.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2724">
                <text>Personality factors in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. J Neuropsychiatr. 1959 Sep-Oct; 1:45-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2725">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2726">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-41-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2727">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2728">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2729">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2730">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2731">
                <text>Two [preprints] and one reprint. Reprint fromJournal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol.I, No.1, Sept-Oct. 1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2732">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2733">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74475">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81036">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87597">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94158">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="290" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="81">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/dcb2d198f268393b586365e8e34503d8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f1412cf3717181597ffc25684c3fe518</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100707">
                    <text>PREDICTION OF INDIVIDUAL PATIENT RESPONSE TO CONVULSIVE'THERAPY
1/

e

i
-

i
e

'

.

&lt;--

Max Fink, M. D.

l

-

E
-ku'xs‘b

The prediction of response to treatment is a necessary daily task of medical
practitioners, who, after a process of clustering the symptoms and signs of illness of a patient,
select a treatment regimen most likely to effect a salutary change in the patient. Where
the classification of the disease is established by definitive criteria
in syphilis. diabeas
tes or malaria - the physician's problem is simplified. Where classification is not based
on definitive criteria, as in heart disease, or mental disease - the physician's
is
problem
complex. for he must resort to the recognition of pattern based on his individual
experiSuch
classification is not readily validated, and in the absence of specified external
ence.
criteria, errors in grouping for therapeutic purposes are frequent.

'
wv'h"'"

‘

'

In the instanCes where

remedies are established by their effectiveness. as in syphilis, or bacterial infections, or avitaminosis - treatment selection is readily defined.
Where remedies are non-specific, as in the treatment of mental illness by environmental
manipulation, psychotherapy and various physiodynamic therapies, the problem is complicatcd, not only by the non-specificity of treatment but by the probability that potentially
effective therapies are applied to potentially responding and potentially
nonresponding pop-

-...-....'..-.-....-..—”.y—--—-

,..

ulations.

The problem is further complicated b y a lack of evaluative criteria of
salutary
Various
change.
approximations are in use, as symptom rating scales, social adaptational
measures, patient self-ratings, and changes in target symptoms. These indices are gencrally too broad, too inclusive and too non-specific to be useful. For example, in the
target symptom approach, the assumption that anxiety in neurotic phobic, neurotic
depressed,
or paranoid schizophrenic subjects are equivalent processes is not valid.
in
Depression
various subjects is no more the same phenomenon than is the fever in t
mania or lung abscess.
c

.

'

There are, therefore, three aspects to the problem of predicting individual patient
response to therapy: the specification of populations (patient selection); the selection of
therapy; and the specification and evaluation of behavioral change. These
will
be
aspects
described with reference to the convulsive therapy evaluation
of the Hillside
programs
Hospital as studied during .the past seven years. Hillside Hospital is a
voluntary,
nonprofit, community supported institution in New York City. In these studies, the
patients
were referred specifically for convulsive therapy by staff psychiatrists to the
special somatic treatment unit which was responsible for all somatic
treatments at the hospital.

..

'

I

I
mvvv’

!

.
'

;

~&lt;~u

.‘-~v-

“tn“

a.

'

,,..~..‘..-....

i

Observing the usual mixed group of subjects referred for convulsive thera
py, we recorded a variety of behavioral adaptive patterns at the times when
subjects had received
the number of treatments sufficient to i nduce
neurophysiological
The
changes.
patterns ineluded euphoria, hypomania, denial, and minimization;
loss
and
increased
memory
complaining; increased fearfulness, agitation and excitement; and withdrawal,
paranoid and
delusional ideation. In assessing these patterns, that of euphoria,
denial
hypomania.
and
minimization was prominently associated with clinical ratings of much improved and
recovered. We termed this adaptive mode "euphoric-hypomanic" and set this
as the criteria
for the behavioral change which we would like to
predict (l).

\r
I

N. Y.

..~:

“

Since treatment selection was defined by the institution, our studies
focused
initially
the definition of parameters of change.

1/ From the De partment of Experimental
‘-

aw.-

'V.¢§“-.~

Methods
on

...._.-.,-..-,',.-»--—s.-

Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I a.

Aided, in part, by grants M-927 and MY¥Z715 of the National Institute of Mental
Health,
U.S. Public Health Service.

317

__W_

-_..

”_.u'

‘U

.—:r..

U..-

‘

�(and
be
therefore
this
show
adaptive
pattern
to
To determine the population prone
terms
usual
diagnostic
or
the
eschewed
symp.
we
recovered)
and
rated as much improved
these
studies
behavior.
During
of
We
measurable
aspects
more
and
sought
tom check list.
the
termed
which
we
neuroconvulsive-therapy
process
the
of
had develOped a concept
a device to
as
convulsions
seen
are
repeated
view.
In
this
(2).
view
physiologic-adaptive
behavioral
function
brain
adap.
altered
of
such
conditions
the
Under
alter brain function.
attitudinal
and
factors.
sociocultural
Thus,
individual
personality,
based
on
tations emerge
indices.
attitude
and
predictive
as
personality
we sought measures of pre-treatment
defined
that
the
we
studies
these
had
completed
we
after
it
was
For the most part,
of
"much
clinical
ratings
the
earlier
tables
these
on
that
"euphoric-denial" pattern, so
with
this
be
to
equated
be.
View.
in
and
our
reported
are,
improved" and "recovered" are
havioral pattern.
Results
Earlier
of
language
patterns.
was
assessment
Our
first
3. Lan ua e measures.
with
brain
dysfunction
that
patients
demonstrated
had
(3)
Kah
and
n
Weinstein
studies by
after
confabulation
and
intra.
disorientation
of
denial,
changes
had characteristic language
language
these
that
same
observed
we
study
electroshock
In
one
venous amobarbital.
those
that
noted
We
patient.
also
of
treatments.
numbers
with
increasing
changes occurred
those
not
while
recovered,
evaluated
as
the
ones
showing these language changes were
content
A
analysis
linguistic
unimproved.
rated
as
generally
exhibiting the changes were
disminimization.
denial.
be
to
explicit
the
in
study
showed the language patterns rated
of
tense,
of
change
third
use
comments,
person,
cryptic
cliches,
evasion,
placement,
(4).
with
question
a
and
responding
withdrawal, qualification,
elecafter
showed
these
who
patterns
language
the
subjects
It seemed probable that
treatment
before
such
to
.
using
patterns
who
have
propensity
a
the
be
ones
troshock would
tested
therefore.
We.
test.
provocative
some
by
changes
if we could elicit the language
adinterview,
structured
short
in
a
questions
each patient before electroshock by asking
then
and
repeated
and
nystagmus.
slurred
speech
until
was
there
amobarbital
ministered
after
amoof
changes
number
language
the
for
the
We
scored
answers
the questions (3).
barbital (4).
We noted a relation between the number of pretreatment language pattern changesthe
during
manifested
clinically
of
changes
number
language
the
to
following amobarbital
between,
also
relationship
a
there
was
1').
Furthermore.
(Table
of
treatment
week
fourth
imof
much
clinical
ratings
and
term
short
changes
the number of pre-treatment language
proved and recovered (Table 2).

TABLE

1

TO
RESPONSE
LANGUAGE
PRETREATMENT
BETWEEN
RELATION
AND
CHANGES
CLINICAL
AND
SODIUM
AMOBARBITAL
WITHDRAWAL DURING TREATMENT

Three or more
clinical language patterns“.

Pretreatment
response to amobarbital sodium
pretreatment
response to amobarbital sodium

No

*x2
+x2
318

4. 26; p&lt; . 05.
6. as; p&lt; . 01.

Withdrawal reactions to amobarbital sodium:

The scorn

denial

sc&lt;

We

1

cal rating

score

and

�TABLE 2
“""“

RELATION OF PRETREATMENT LANGUAGE CHANGES WITH AMOBARBITAL
SODIUM TO EVENTUAL CLINICAL RESPONSE

V:

«vs

Change with
amobarbital sodium‘I
Much Improved

19

-~..-,..’.

68%

.-.~.e.

..

Moderately
Improved

_,_

‘91-

_

Unimproved

*x2- 10. 30; P

&lt; .01

y-a-M-...‘;N

-——vr--

b. Famil Interviews. Our second assessment was a denial personality
As
inventory.
patients were referred for convulsive therapy, we interviewed a relative in an unstruc-

exploratory interview. The questions were designed to determine the degree to
which the patient approximated the explicit verbal
described
personality
type
Weinstein
by
and Kahn (3). On fifteen items, patients were scored on
three
a
scale
of
l
point
and
2.
0,
The scores were ranked and divided in half - those in the
half
termed
were
upper
"high
denial score" and those in the lower half, as "low denial score" (5).
tured,

vvvu—n-

.vw-

.

.
w».-

w—

v

.AW

observed a significant relationship between the denial score and short term clinical ratings (Table 3), In addition. there was a
significant
between
relationship
the
denial
score and the number of clinical language changes during treatment (Table 4).
We

.
-pv

TABLE

.-

3

..1..—.

RELATION OF DENIAL PERSONALITY TO CLINICAL RESPONSE
TO ELECTROSHOCK

'Much
Improved

Personality Score

-

,ewv.

.w-vv-

Moderately
Improved

,V,

l4
s

7

u-....r.»-v

21
T,-..,'.«..ﬂ_~.

—.s.-—.—

.--.-..

TABLE 4
RELATION OF DENIAL PERSONALITY SCORES TO CLINICAL
LANGUAGE CHANGES DURING TREATMENT

Personality Scores
11-25 (2.0)
0-10 (20)

Number Language Changes
8

l7

‘

12
3

*

.

319

�We
the
did
Rorschach.
was
task
Another
not
essayed
Determinants.
Rorschach
c.
look upon this test in the usual interpretive manner. but scored the number and patterns of
Rorschach determinants following the schemata of Klopfcr and Kelley (6).
It was observed that ratings of much improved and recovered were associated with
the following Rorschach criteria; absent human movement (M). absent form color (PC).
few responses, high form percentage (F ). presence of color (C) and color form (GP) or
absence of all color. and low shading response. One schedule is reproduced in Figure l

(7)-

FIGURE

1

RELATION OF RORSCHACH PATTERN TO

CLINICAL RESPONSE TO EST

°/°

NO M,

no c

M,CF AND

[3

MUCH

IMPROVED

NO M,

a\
MODERATELY
IMPROVED

AND

no M,.cF/c

M, NO

c

F6 AND M, FC

UNIMPROVED.

d. California F Scale. Still another attitudinal task is the California F Scale. This
is
the
which
to
10
subject
statements
of
global
of
uncritical,’
series
consists
a
task
simple
asked to express the extent of his agreement or disagreement. High scores reﬂect high
agreement, and low scores, high disagreement (8).

There was a significant correlation between high F scores and favorable clinical
and
(9,10)
studies
factors
social
out
realso
carried
In
we
addition,
5).
(Table
ratings
ported that favorable outcome was associated with few years of education. foreign'birth.
and older age.
'

»

TABLE

5

RELATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS TO DISCHARGE
RATINGS IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
.

Recovered
Much Improved
Improved and
Unimproved
320

Mean F

Score
53.1

Mean
Age

Mean Years
Education

7-

50

9. 4

/ 10.6
12. 3

Foreign
Born

‘

35
17

�Conclusion

summary, we have observed that a variety of pre-treatment measurable aspects
of behavior, usually described as personality variables, are associated with the develop—
ment of the euphoric-hypomanic adaptive pattern in convulsive therapy and are rated as
much improved or recovered in our setting. These variables have been defined in language
patterns, denial scores on family interviews, perceptual style reflected in the Rorschach.
California F Scale measure of attitude, and the social variables of age, educational level,
and birthplace.
These personality and social variables provide the perceptual and attitudinal bases
for the adaptive changes which occur under the conditions of altered brain function induced
by repeated convulsions. Absence of these personality traits, in the presence ,of equivalent
degrees of brain function leads to other adaptive patterns, usually rated as "improved" or
"unimproved. " and not to the euphoric-hypomanic mode.
In

The same theoretical model of the neurophysiologic - adaptive interactional hypothesis
is applicable to drug therapy (2, ll). We would suggest that different agents are psychopharmaceutically useful to the extent that brain function is altered systematically. These
can be measured by the electroencephalogram, although not exclusively. Under the conditions of persistent altered brain function, changes in adaptation will occur, dependent on
pre-treatment personality variables. These can be specified, and studies now in progress
at Hillside Hospital are assessing this model for various psychotropic agents.

References
(1)

Pink. M. and Kahn, R. L. : Patterns of Behavioral Change and Improvement in Convulsive Therapy. AMA Arch. Gen. Psychiat. (in press).

(2)

Fink, M. : A Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies". J. Hillside

(3)

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R. L. : Denial of Illness: Smbolic and Physiological Aspects, Springfield, Ill. C. C. Thomas, 1955.

(4)

Kahn, R. L. and Fink. M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy. Psycho atholo of Communication, Ed. Hoch. P. and Zubin. J., Grune &amp; Stratton
1958, pp. l26-139.

(5)

Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M. : Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock Therapy. J. Neuropsych. 545-49. 1959.

(6)

Klopfer.

(7)

Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M. : Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical Response to Convulsive Therapy. J. Neuropsych. _1_: 242-245, 1960.

(8)

Kahn, R. L. , Pollack, M. , and Fink, M. : Social Attitude (California F Scale) and
Convulsive Therapy. Jour. Nerv. Ment. Dis. L351: 187-192, 1960.

(9)

Kahn, R. L. , Pollack, M. and Fink. M. : Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital. J. Hillside Hosp. 2: Zl6-228. I957.

(10)

Kahn, R. L. , Pollack, M. and Fink, M. : Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric
Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization. Discharge
Ratings and Diagnosis. AMA Arch. Gen. Psychia . l_: 565-574. 1959.

1942.

(ll) Fink,

B._

and Kelley, D.: The Rorschach Technique. New York, World Book Co. .

EEG and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents. NeuroPsychopharmacology. ed. Bradley. P. . Elsevier, Amsterdam, 441-446. 1960.
M.

:

DR. LASKY:
.,-

Thank you Dr. Fink. Do members of the panel have any questions or comments?

'r~

r-

”‘5

|

321

”.“wnpm‘.

�DR. KLERMAN:

I

Max, you presented with a fair amount of specificity, the personality and social fac.
tors which characterize the patient. Iwas disappointed in that the other half of your
neuro-adaptive scheme was left unspecified. Namely, is there any specificity in the alter.
ation of brain function that is as predictive as these specific social and persouality factors?

‘

.

patien1

adapta
to tree
will nc

brain
are co
convul
nnl, tt
that hi

.

DR. PINK:

answer to that is that we do have considerable specificity for the various
treatments that we use. If I might have Figure 2. This Figure will show that we did use
electroencephalographic measures. We were rating the EEG changes according to criteria
which we called high degree-slow wave activity. This index could be specified and quantified. After determining which records were "high degree" slow wave activity, we were
able to go back and look at the patients who had shown the much improved category, the
moderately improved and the unimproved. It is apparent that of the patients who were in
the much improved group, about 90% of the records of that group had shown high degrees
of EEG change during the third. and fourth weeks of treatment. It is also clear that the pa.
tient's who were "unimproved" did not show the high degrees of EEG change. We interpret
these data to indicate that unless a patient has a high degree of EEG change he will not
.show behavioral change. It is necessary to have changes in brain function and it is under
the conditions of the brain change that adaptive change will ocdur. The type of adaptive
change depends on these personality variables. In drug therapy we have other EEG patterns which can also be specified.
I think the

change

'shock.

-

DR ' L

I
schalk
comm
much
crude
with tl
'

DR. F

FIGURE 2

I

.
h.

r

.

&gt;‘

,._

o—MUCH IMPROVED (u)

E

..... moo IMPRovsom

g

S

3O

‘

-

DR.

7

_

umumoveom

(3

spe cif
tional
being

.
‘

has

s‘c

UJ
LL]

as

0
0
$

DR. F

LL!

I

reflec

know \

“I":

atric

6
5

u

these
more
our e1
ber of

E:

we do
much
eupho:
being:

2%

if
‘

'

4'6

7'9

“242

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

statin:

.

behavj
which

.

.

DR. KLERMAN.

Is one difference between this kind of physiologic measure and the other measures in
that they occupy different type predictive factor? Would you say here that unless the patient has this characteristic, EEG changes, he will not subsequently develop behavior and
adaptive changes but can you predict before the treatment in any physiologic way whether
or not a given patient will manifest these characteristic delta wave changes 7 In other
words there is a difference between a predictive variable that you described as existing or ..
characteristic with the patient prior to his exposure to the treatment and a predictive variable that says he must experience a certain kind of change under the inﬂuence of the so-

matic therapy.

322

:

‘

-

this a‘
$323:

-

ation
This i

‘

:ﬁfhﬁ

hospit

e ducai

�PINK:
I think what you are asking is whether we can predict the physiologic response of the
patient. I think we can, although this is much more difficult than predicting the behavioral
adaptation. We still do not know what the determinants are or how to measure them prior
to treatment, to predict whether a person will or will not show a drug response or will or
will not show a physiologic response. The question is not one of a sequence, where altered
brain function comes first and then the subjects involuntarily adapt to it. These processess
arc concurrent. At the time that brain function is changing under the influence of repeated
convulsions or under the influence of repeated doses of drugs, the perceptual, the attitudinal, the conceptual and all the other aspects of patient behavior are undergoing change so
that his whole view of life and his response to his environment is changed. The kind of
change he shows depends on his pretreatment propensities, as we tried to show on electroshock.
DR.

‘\

x

v

w

-«

~

.rv-w--.

"a...

mv‘vo—‘w

“

o...—

DR. LASKY:

01--

-

Dr. Fink, we'll ask another question or two. They are short ones. think Dr. Gottschalk and I have something rather similar in mind. Now, the one I had was--Could you
comment On your criterion. You used a three level over-all clinical rating of recovery,
much improved and improved. Now the question that comes to my mind is why use such a
crude criterion when you are using rather quantitative measures as predicters and ties in
with that, of course, what (ices this criterion mean that a man is "improved" 7
I

DR.

”on

mu

w-wﬁnwvr'Vb-‘M

FINK:

Dr. Gottschalk, do you want to ask something ?

w-vﬁmnmm

DR. GOTTSCHALK:

Well, I had a somewhat similar question, but I have focused on something a bit more
specific than that--As whether Dr. Fink had any idea why those people with lower educational levels tended to have more improvement, was this possibly because of the goals
being less as compared say to persons with higher educational levels, then of course this
has some relationship to the question about the criterion for improvement.

'r-v-q—vruwm.“

-

‘
a

‘

Wm

DR.

‘w

FINK:

.5
we‘rv

..

think that both these questions are crucial ones.. I tried to indicate that our slides
reflect early aspects of our studies. At the time that we did these first studies, we did not
know what we were using as the eventual criterion of behavioral change. We used psychiatric ratings much as everybody else. This criterion was fairly effective. In the course of
these studies, we learned that there were different behavioral modes, and these seem a
more meaningful criterion. We are now in the process of assessing patients going through
our electroshock program, trying to predict these various modes. Unfortunately, the number of patients referred for electroshock in 1960-61 has dropped off precipitously, so that
we do not have a large enough sample. But, the statement of the slides on recovered and
much improved reflects, ‘as we look back in our data, those patients who showed the
euphoric-hypomanic adaptation. That adaptation can be characterized by a feeling of wellbeing; an attitude on the ward of being fine; dressing up, and participating; and on inquiry
stating they are no longer sick or depressed and that there is nothing wrong with me. Such"
behavioral changes are the ones that psychiatrists rate as much improved. In our hospital,
which is psychodynamically oriented, there are a number of psychiatrists who have seen
this adaptation and have said that this is not improvement, but explicit denial is a psy—
chotic adaptation. There is, therefore, a problem of evaluating what we mean by much
improvedor unimproved. The question about educational level is also related. The evaluation of "much improved" is dependent on the psychiatrist's or the evaluater's attitude.
This is one of the reasons why the use of much improved characterizations across hospitals is almost impossible. We tried to show this yesterday in Dr. Pollack's report of our
tri-hospital study where discharge ratings did not have the same meaning in the various
hospitals. The educational level is important because. there is something about being well
educated in the American culture which does not lend itself to the use of the, gross denial
I

,

r‘tV‘W‘WW'

mq—

v'fT'V-a

run-"Vera

nrw—

m.

u~—WWWW—w—wm~n»

l—"r'"

le‘fp

”r"

«-

-m

.»

1‘

i

l
t

i
l

i
V

‘323

i

i
i
i

�\Q

institution
is
this
in
and
reour
them,
we
see
as
cultures
ive
The
more primit
response.
who
have
and
in
may
Europe
who
born
were
flected in the people in the older age group
the
adaptation
use
or
such
can
people
that
in
Europe,
life
sustained their early
processes
American
Our
younger.
intelligent,
denial.
more
verbal
do use the adaptation of explicit
born girls and boys just don't use gross denial.
the
for
I
on
use
apologize
must
and.
is
poor
very
The use of improved categorization
The
next
studies.
started
our
the
we
is
that
way
the slides, but Ihad to use it because
reflect
will
but
an
have
not
will
that.
two
hence,
series of slides, hopefully a year or that
have teased
think
we
which
we
predictors
the"
hope
we
Then
adaptive mode typology.
differences.
those
in
demonstrating
effective
be
will
out using improving categories

in ap

procedure

by investi;

In or

pharmacol
lucidly, tc
jsctive es;
of familia:
able dosa;
'age level
not associ
experimer
pipradr‘ol
tect: 47 ju
:

DR. LASKY:
who
A.
'Gottschalk.
Louis
Dr.
is
next
Our
speaker
Fink.
Thank you very much, Dr.
Cinof
Psychiatry.
the
Department
at
Coordinator
Research
and
is Associate Professor
to
Individual
Pay.
Response
is
"Measuring
his
of
title
The
paper
cinnati General Hospital.
Free-Associative)
Behavior
(or
Verbal
and
Method
a
Introspective
an
choactive Drugs by
Method. " Dr. Gottschalk.

Fron

the indivic
a seconda:
by pipradz
themselve
able to wo
one thing
themselve
duced stin
1

AN
BY
DRUGS
PSYCHOACTIVE
TO
RESPONSES
INDIVIDUAL
MEASURING
INTROSPECTIVE METHOD AND A VERBAL BEHAVIOR
(0R F REE-ASSOCIATIVE) METHOD 1]

of accomp]

,

‘

Louis A. Gottschalk, M. D.
Introduction
is
a
redrugs
to
psychoactive
and
individual
idiosyncratic
responses
the
Measuring
of
study
and
The
systematic
serious
search area of increasing interest to investigators. the fact that the collective effect of
such phenomena is made difficult and compounded by
and
the
unique
that
time
the
at
same
the psychoactive drug has to be accurately measured
for
accounted
plausibly
whenever
possible,
and,
observed
individual effect is being validly
at some level of organization.
individual
the
for
and
accounting
of
measuring,
Approaches to this problem detecting, and
methof
the
Some
principal
ingenious.
been
have
many
drugs
to
psychoactive
response
different
with
major
of
to
of
patients
a
drug
administration
groups
The
ods have been: l)
suband
of
behavioral
different
for
patterns
psychiatric nosological syndromes and looking
psychoneuroschizophrenia,
the
,
category,
to
diagnostic
e.g.
jective reactions according
1929;
1953;
Bensheim,
and
1952
and
Pennes,
sis, etc., (Beringer, 1927; Hoch, Cattell,
of
of
the
relationship
Z)
determination
The
1960).
Weinstein, 1953 and 1954; Kornetsky,
beor
profiles
with
different
personality
associated
to
a drug
varying individual reSponses
by
measured
etc.
--as
hysteria,
depression,
extraversion,
havioral patterns--such as,
and
(Kornetsky
evaluations
clinical
psychiatric
various psychologic inventories or tests or
individof
the
The
3)
1958).
assessment
a1.
1955;
Laverty.
,
Humphries, 1957; Lasagna, et
of
defear
such
a
conflict,
as,
with
psychodynamic
a
ual reactions to a drug associated
different
The
investigation'of
4)
1957).
pendence (Gottschalk, et a1. , 1956; Sarwer-Foner,
Kurland.
1955;
and
1950
1956;
et
a1.,
Wolf,
and
1955
a1.
et
.
reactions to placebos (Beecher,
the
hence
and
effect
placebo
sometime
of
powerful
the
1960), which provide an indication
individual placebo component of the reaction to a drug.
of
Medicine.
of
College
Cincinnati,
of
University
the
Department Psychiatry.
1/ From
from
(MY-1055)
research
in
grant
a
by
These investigations have been supported part
and
Welfare.
Education
of
Health.
Mental
of
Health,
Department
the National Institute
324

The i
the individ
about the i
very devia
ple and 1e:
tive drugs

character

cannot, ho

rically

we]

drug addic
individual

major psy¢

The
pharmacol

I

assessing

1960,

1961‘

measuring

perimenta
situation
subject to
1

investigatl
The verba
the only 1':
of ‘speech
The relia’:
the scales

eral or ty:

been devel
s chizophr

‘

�lfiﬁlt$1ll at Indxvtiaaz Pattau$

nutpunua $0 etuvuzntvu rhnrtpy

Ill! Flak, Raﬁ.

.: Impurinuntnl Payuhattry,

fvun tho nlylr§ncnﬁ
#10! MC. ‘31., 'gta

tad-i, 1: port,

Hillttan Ibupitnl.

0: tin luttcuul
Ilnl%h aurvict.

by graaﬁn uaytv nai 31.:115

Instittﬁo of Haiti} Icalth. v.3. PuBISa
Proaoatnd gt ti: 6%; annual V.A. lcuoaroh atatcrtutc,

1': 8/13/61

�rouponio
1n
n nonalu
ﬁvtatuunt
to
prudxutlaa
o;
it:
IOdIOIl yrsctatxynorn, at». 31%.: a
vary «£517 ttak
arupttat ind stuns o: illnoua o:
grants. 0: alxnﬁurtug

::

ti.

a putatut, atlact I trtttuon‘ raglan: moat likely $0 otttcﬁ
was».
tho
tho
in
‘8ango
clanuitlcttioa
unlutnry
pntiunt.
:
of it: ‘13.... :- estabISshcd by antlnitavc 091%.r1a an in
typhtlis, 61:50:03 or malaria th¢=phyutotua'u vrohlcn in
usnplitatd. whit. clacnttiaa‘taa 1: not b!!!‘ on definittvu

.

~
disoutc
Inutul
thGlittil, tr
phynictun's yrobluu 1. uonvlex, tar ha aunt raaovt tn the
raeocaittca or pattcrn bssod on his 1361114311 cxyurtanao.
Inch olunutrteu‘lon 1. act readily *alldntcd, and in the
thuunc- at apccttlsd axtorunl oritoria, 09?!!! in grouwinu
to: thsrtpcutta pnrpoaon urc trcqncut.
In it. anatanoon Ihlfi rI-caion at. iatubliahod by
thuir artistIVInoal, a: in nyphtllo, at hscturzgl tntnottoaa,
0r nvttuasaontu - £rnutncnt 0.100%10n 1: ro&amp;4117 tortacd.
what. raunélun up! una~:poottta; n: in the tralCanat if
uantnl 311:... by .nvirulnnuttl nuntpulttiun, pnyuhcthurnpy
nae vnrlcun phyvluayuuntc thcrapioo, ta. problan 1: Gain
placntod, an: only by tun unwoupoattlctty Qt trcntnnuﬁ
Eat 37 the probability that pntuutiilly'urtccttvo thornpiou
and
to
mapltsd
pct¢at13113 nun.
ratpauﬁllg
petuntltlly
Ir.
r.upond£ag populttiouo.
the problnu :- further ocuylioutcd by a Ina! or
cvaltatavc crasorsu or aslutnrr «bingo. Variou- uppromintu
$1.». 33¢ in a... nu uyuptan tutti: uculni. 3001.1

ari‘«r£s,

an

1: heart

�.m,

Idtp‘ltttnil atannrnt, putiant ¢¢It~rntiu¢a, sud ihtﬁﬂl!
in strait nynptonu. $31.: 13d1¢¢5 art :cnurllly tlu
b?ill. to. incluntvt Out to. non-nyueitzo t; h. utctil.

for CIIIDIO, in it. tar¢1t I’lptdn apprauoh, tn; anaunp‘lun
that anxiety 1n noaroﬁlt phattc, uﬁuro£1n daprcscod, a:
paranoid naiinoyhruuiu lthtItﬂ at. ugutvnloat arousaaOI
1: nit valid. napvtasinn In various «ataoota a: nu I02¢
tan tuna phanoncnuu thug a. ‘3. first in ﬁukcratlonis,

ynluuoatt

tr its: drastic.

nipacto
to tin protlou
this! nra. thuruttrc, ﬂirt.
of proiitilu: inltvadaﬁl pattant rtuponac to thcrt’yg it.
upocsttctttun it purulgtxlu- (pataoat '01-.tAcu); tan
talotttuu at ﬁhnrayyy and tho Ipuuartaatioa and cvgllatiua
o: bohnvlurul :Inugo. That. guy-etc Itll bu actortbod
with rttarcaua in the cauvulalvu thavuyy tvnlnation prvcrtun
a! ﬁt. tillaldt laivitdl an ctudtid during thc pnu$ IUVUI
gusts. 111131;. Ritalin: it a thgntary, nonwprutxt.
eon-natty anppcrtod 1ac$1tatzon 1n luv ﬂirt 63". In that.

tuanatomy
"no
Mum
mu
gum. a. nun»

vulutvu thirty: by aﬁnt! pnythsstrtuts to the 19001.1
nu-nﬁto trastnnat :318 tits) at; roapaanthlu tor all

tauntic sysataaut: at tic httpstul.

mm:

513:. trantntnt coluctsca

our cﬁmdaou
or changn.

initially

tbcgacq

III

it

datinod by thy Incitinttou.

ﬁt. dofiuttilm at

ynvunatnvc

�n53.»

antarctic 5h: tunul atatd group a! Iuhstétu rcfttrﬁﬁ
um
tOOIrdId a itriuty at iuhiriaral
ounvnlntvo
tharnpy,
it:
udapttva pgtturnu 3t tho ‘tnnn when nuhsacto had roeoivtd
.thc 383509 of troltnnntu Initiatont t0 induct naurtphyiiolocicul antagoa. 1h. pattarun 13011614 cughnriu, hypauuuit.
X00.
and tauranuad couwltiaw
lnﬁ
scumry
aiuiniaatsan;
atrial,
1am; inoraAI-d tourtulncuo, ugitutian and clattancnt; and
withdrawn}, ptranatd and dnluntuual iauattau. In nsnassing
than: unitarul, that at nuphartt. hyvonuuat. dupini and
3131315551.» van aroniutntly agitaatiod 81th clinical rattan:
01 Inch inprtvnd uni rnoovcrud. Ha tarnnd this snaptavo
and. 'Ilphnriauhapouunxc' as! not ﬁts. as $8. ariﬁoraa (or
tic hohtviornl Ihlnli thick at until 11:. ‘0 prodlat (I).
in ﬁatarnino ‘hc p¢pultﬁtln 9:03. to that thin
tdqptlvc puttura (and thorotura by ritad II 3:33 iuprcvui
and r'covurcd) an uaahauud ﬁn; Ic‘ul dingaantnu torn: or
taught unrc honourabla anyocta at
activiuw. Duran; thou. utuaica v. had dcvtlupad a stucopt
or in. convultlvu-thornpy'praaist think an tarnnd tin
nouruphrsiaiocismudapttva vita (a). In thin vicu, rnpoatad
«intuitions urn lCﬁn a: u dgvtat to alto: brain truatiuug
Undur it. atadttann: or tank lliﬁriﬁ brush taxation h¢hsv1tva1
uasptttionn nuwtga tuned on indivtautl partuntltty, lactacultural and attitudtuul rin$pra. raga. an tomcat unalarna
at prcatruasnnut pavnannltty «a: attitndn an pradtttlvu
symptoa chock

tadiait.

liut,

mad

�.4...

It: ﬁt: unit part, It ran nttnr u. ind

uolpldtud
this. siuasot tint um cosine! tau ‘U‘Qhﬁtiﬁhltﬁlil’
pgttaru. :0 ihtﬁ on than. tahlnu ﬁt: ourltnr «lininal
ratings 0: 'umuh auyrwvoaﬁ and *rwcvvared' urn 20903104
and cit. in car vicw, it b: tqnztnd witk than bohmvtnrcl

gust-ru-

I

a

;

u:

A.

Ina-11w

Langﬁaga nannuran

at: tarst gurus-nan! was of imaging. patt‘rnu.
and“: by minute» and mm (3) m cum-tuna

that pl‘tlﬂ‘l with basin dyml‘acttQI had churaatortatit
lancuucu chanson u: tout-1. diaovtuntttlun and cuatnbulntsou

it‘.’ iatruvuacnn
an

OhOOrVIO

tint

tnnbnrblﬁax. In an. c1¢¢Qr9Ihntk study
thcnu a... ltuculcc chtngns uacurrna It‘s

1302.531»; nuubnr3

at ﬁata‘luu‘a.

Ho

Ill. ﬁtted tint that.

ya‘toatu ohiuttgl‘hosc luncu;go chanson war. in. and.
ovalultci an vucovnrtd, title than. nut annihitlag the
.chnlgta tutu guncrully tutti an unimprovaa. A lingutnttc
soatalt‘iathatu ahavud tbs languagu pntﬁarna rntca in
:3. Iiiﬂy in he uxpllett £03131, Ianilisn£t¢u, dtuplacuutnﬁ,
CVttiuu, clichcu, crypttu ocuanutc, II. of ttlrd purcun,
lhlnxt or tonne, withdrtuul. qunlltiaatiun, :nd roupondxug
with 3 citation (h).
Xi aaauct probahzu that $3: Iuhsuotc It. august
thin. Inusutcu puttcrnc utter aluo‘rcchuok vuuld be the fill
any but! u prnpauatty to I‘tﬂg itch 9I$itlil burst. truatHOQt

�.5g'

II
tait.

12

00:13

olacit sh. laacuago «haunt.

by nous prcvcau£1vo

no, uhurgtovo. tou‘od 0:0h putanut tutors ulnaﬁrcshank by acting qncstloan in t abort a‘rtttnrla intOtvtiu,
Idntaiaﬁartd unohnrbtﬁal uu‘xl that: In: Ilnrr-d apo¢ah
lad ayatngnnn, and #305 rtpuated tho quca‘iout (3). we
luarcd tbs Innunrn {pr tho u‘ubur at luagulgc chanson altar

mu»! alﬁcd
0:).

at

u

rolatlln butv.uu the ntnbgr or

pru~

$I¢utuuai language puttnru chi-go: following :noharbttul
ta £hn mutate a: luugnnao chtngcs Ianttuu£ad 311310311:
during tn. fourth rock 0: tran‘nout (Tunic I). Furtharnnro,
that. can :13. $ rolationohxp httﬂlﬂn tn. nuibcr or protrottlout linguoco chanson and about torn clinics: rating:
ﬁnd
rtcovorod (tabla 11).
or Inch ingrowcd
ﬁ‘-‘ .. O“ 40“ ‘

rabltu I, I!

3. ltully Iatorvituw

: dautnl p¢raoa31tty
rotorrcd it: touvulttvo thnrnpy,

Our accond aunnolnnat

at;

savvniory. In patients worn
no tltnrvinuod a ruxttlvu an an uanructurod, caploratorr
£n$orvicu. fun qunatton: var! 60313306 ta actarline the
vhtci
303:3. to
tic pat10u% .pariualutcd tbs axpllost
vvrbul plrsonnlity typc duccribol I7 “biacttin Ind tab»
(3). an titties itnna, patients were t£09¢4 on &amp; throa
point tall. at o, 1 ‘nd 2. 1h. IIOFDI nur- rgnkod and

�.75.

dividcd in half . thlil in tho app»: htlt cur. taruod
'hxzh Junta: tact.“ and thtst an ‘3. lava: h:1!, us '10!

innit! it!!!“ (5).

aigaittulut rulutleulhip butauon tin
short torn eliutcul rating: (table 111).

no abacrvoa a

dcnial ntoru and
In aﬁdation. chart was a siguztiuuut rulntsonshiy untrue»
‘hn «tutu! IOOIO and it. illhlr or clinical langunso GICIIOI
daring £routunu$ (tabla It).

D--“m““--‘

215190 121, IV

..¢..~........

c. lartchnah nutcruanuntu
Anothur task cunnyue In: in: lornchtch. 80 did
u.% look uyou that tout in thc It!!! inturprctivo nuancr,
hat scarce tho IIIbCf and pattcrnt a: Iorlchloh eatcruauv
unﬁt following in. unhonstn 0! 110990: ﬁnd tollty (6).

It III

Obaorvcd ﬁhnt vstinga or tank improvud

and rucovurad wort tauoain£od with the

tailoring Inraohaoh

crituric; thaini lunan havonunt (I), ubuuat for: 001.:
(re), tut raupauuua. high for: ptroautnco (30), proscuco
at atlor (6) Ind 0010: turn (or) if «haunt. a: .11 oolnr,
10' thuﬂiug rulpcntt. can Iahudulo 1: rugrodtco‘
Inblo 1 {7).’
and

fihlo

V

-Wd

1n

�.7.
a. culitoruia I aetistill anoint! attitudinal tint in tho caiitoruin
r 80.1.. this ailpln tank eon-int: at n 0:21.: at 10
unoriiiaai, global sintonnntc to which in. Inbaoct in
Ilkod to otprocl the cairn: of his agrcoaont or dinnarcosemi. list .3090. rotioct high tarocnnnt, and low amoroa,
hick iiungrtclant (a).
that. VII I liguiticuni curt-iniita hair... high
r snort. and taverahio clinical rutinga (tail. '1). In
addiiion, u. .1:- curriod out toainl factor. Italian
(9.10) and roperiod ihai tavorahlo antenna val aaaociuicd
with for yuaro or adiaution. tor-inn birth, und .16.: ago.

-‘....”

Tﬁblt VI
GQlCEVSIOls

In Cilllfy, no but. oboorvcd this a varinty of pr.trottnaat lauuurabia aspect: at b-havior, unually douoribod
.3 porooanlitw varinﬁina, it. nauociniad with tho devoIOpr
nant at tho ouphorieahypolnnio aduptivo pittcrn in unavainivo ihcrnpy and Ir. rated in luck inprcvod u: r-oovorod
in our uniting. in... variuklou havo boon auxin-d in
language pittorna, Gemini 30.9.. on 2:311: int-trio's,
puroapiuni styl- rotlooicd in the nor-chuck, culitorain
Sonia nannurn or nttitudc, and in. social variabiao 0:
:30, educational 10701, and hirihvluca.

r

�“as

this: permanality and utoitl vurtuhlnu yravtdu tha
ptrauptutl and attitudinal bacon tar tug tdnptiva cunngon
whiwh oaaur undur thn unuﬁttitag a: Alcarsd Evita function
induced a7 rnpcttnd canvulqtoan. tsunami of that. paracn~
alt$y truits. in th. pvncwuua a: aqu£V§lont duct... at
Evita lunettun Illdl to 0th.: udtpsivn yu‘turna. attally
an
to
m
“mm-4'«ass-9W»,
a»
am
a. maman
’

hypluunic luau.
the Inn. tha0r0£1oil natal a! tin acurnphyuialouic ¢
IdlpttVI znt¢ra¢tinnn1 hypcahc-is 1: nppliauqu ‘0 drug
Gillan-at ig'n‘l
ihcrnpy (2.11). "b woula sugguut
at. yaynhupharnucnatsaally~1:0!!! tn tho extant that brain
tuucslon In Il‘trﬁd ayataunttenklr. Yucca can bu nonsurud
By tin olnatraanoaphulogrnn. althangh ant axalautvqu.
Ulnar eh. eundttaouu at pcrnlntent n1£arn¢ hrgia run¢£1ou,
ohtugua in aiuptntauu V111 ﬁcaur, dcycnauut 0n prnutruutnwut

tht

pgrioanltty vurinhlus. 3!... «an h. apouttiaa, tad attitaa
piogrunt
law in
ut lilllidt.‘0.vti¢1 av: nanotling thin
nodal :0: variant ya:who$ropio Iz¢ntu.

�1a

iiuk;

l.

and tab». 3.3.2 rattcruu at iwhuvturtl nhnsun and
Improvunous in auavu111Vt fhnrlpy. 5g; arch. 633:

_!gzgg;gt. (in prnsu).
a. tint, 5.: 1 Iaitsod fhnory at tho ﬁction 0! thytisdynnnta
$303351... 2. la;§¢§da gang. g; 197*206, 1957.
J. Unina£¢$a, 3.1. Ind Kuhn, 1.x.u 9593:; at ;;;ngtug

8M..;
4,“,
¢.c. rkants, 1955.
laka, 3.5. and link, n.v' Ghatgct in
»

-

‘

s

.

l.

A

;

Satanic“, In.

$nngungc During

llocirauhuck Ihavtpy. r
Ed. au¢n, 9. an: zubgn, a., Eran. s acrnttaa 1955,
pp. 126-139.
Ital, 3.1. tut rink. 3.: ruraouniity ructora 1a Behavinrtl
laupnnio to Exactruahock Ikurayy. 3. xtnrgggzgh. 53
.

&amp;5«u9, 1959.

tlnytar, a.

raahtnh itchns nu.
It! Ibrk, khrld Beak $6., lﬁha.
labs, B.L. and Fink, n.: Prsgnautit 731:: at Rartehnuh
aritarAa in altuical lacyumau t0 cruvulsiwc thorapy.
and £01101, 9.3.

2524“, 196a.
$d§1ﬂ1
an‘
Attattdo
Pallusk,
2.:
link,
3.1.,
u.,
Illa,
{Bularornsu r sail.) ané euavultivv fhcrupy; gaggz_gggzg
n¢n3, 23;, 329; xsr~191, late.
3.?
una
Social raatnra in
lain, I.&amp;., rilluck, x.
rant,
galactiua at Therapy in u Vtiuu‘nry lcnttl lbtpttll.
a, :zzxsasg 5352, g; 21£~2¢a, 1957.
1, trauma”.

9»

-ho 8

0

A:

�13..

mm. 3.3...

Mink,

“put:

0: Psychiatric

huugs

and

amt.»

n.

Mutton a:

91mm“.

565-515., 195’.

In as an
mu “on”.

ﬂak,

8.: Boominholuie

tht
banana“...

it. and rank.

is: a

m

alumina).

Arch.

“In-nun mm

Mums.

M: g mthat, y

taut; a: antenna”.

$3me
Slum”, mum, mama, 1960.

Mnualuz, «I.

11%

.

III-why,

h,

�153;! I

Relatian Dotuvou Prttruatnnat Lﬁuutnso

Ambuhitnl

Sodium and

Withdrawal

Io.

ROIpOIuo

clinical chant”

atria:

to

an"?

Truatuont

then. or nor.

aliniasl ltn-

Hithdrawul rauc$103. ta that 2A».

“A w.»

Protrcstlcnt
rnaponno to unotarbstll India:

39

EB

60

protrontncnt
I.roapouoa
to tits
bnrbtt;1 nodttn

)5

11

31

“x2
$12

.

'

13.26]

’

6‘88,

P &lt; G91

&lt;

.05

.

pct 00“

21

10

12

3h

..

m.

per coat

�153;; I!

nun-n

Mm.

or Protruhmnt
chann- Huh
Sou“ to ﬁght). 61131311

may;
m:
nut Input“
Hodn‘tolr
”mi
Uni-pm“
«:2

-

10.30:

52:

r

«at.

Q

_

I with

”an“

m

:8

19

68

22

8

3‘

15

3

to

.01

1

put out.

«1m

�mm

lolattoa or again: rationality to eliuitnl
g. tinctggghnak
Rich

thnrutclr

gagrlrgd gggruvud

Porlanggttz Swag.
11 to 25
0 $0 10

total

icspmuac

33§EEI¢V0¢

rota!

15

9

1

2h

-II

‘0

NI

23

11

13

0

h?

�null-non

mg

If Maul res-nudity “on: to c1121”:
Lluggagu Change. During treatment
lumbar ,

a

—

2

3 Or

zutuong;gtz acgggu
11-25 (20)
0-19 (20)

lutal

B

12

11

3

25

15

not.

�IA

‘

T

Rolatton or Rorschach rusty»: ta clinical
Icggoaau 1n cuuvuzuiva

I

Ind-rutaly
Ilprcvvd
tad

lull

taprovod

Egagigggti

novounat

39

11

(283)

28

(72!)

laugh lwvununﬁ

58

28

(58$)

29

(hit)

ﬂu?;;

I.

rattan;

:9
0 10: to )
For:tor:
001::
lo

3b
53

.

6.16.
7

32

p

21$
£601;

:3 - 11.570
Both a and

re
re

”
lotthor I nor ’6
num- a

h
10
25

21:

25
38

xa

awa‘h Xi‘an'

'

4.01

p

3.”

{mi
661
“on,

P

uorrtuttuu {tr diocoatxnut‘r.

2?
21
&lt;2

79%

éheﬁ;

.001
20

15
13

C4001

(83%

$60!;
3h!

�m1;
Illntton at 8.31:1 rattorc to Discharge
gg£iagl 1n convnlutvo lhurgzz

I

Iu‘n 1 833a

8

53.1

Itch turret-d

26

Inprcvod an!
Uninptcvcd

23

Inc-vurod

,0

abnn that:
3 CV‘ I

1

retail!
3

9.h
10.6

so

h1,8

51.6
h3.8

39;?

3!.)

11.3

17

35

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2894">
                <text>Prediction of individual patient response to convulsive therapy. VA Cooperative Chemotherapy Studies in Psychiatry, 6:317-24.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2895">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2896">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-58-024</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2897">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2898">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2899">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2900">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2901">
                <text>Photocopy of publication with Q &amp; A and [preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2902">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2903">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74492">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81053">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87614">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94175">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="283" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="74">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2c170ecde2c5784e8f07a062c10eb68d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5609f5c2406d7b6449fb5af08c8f4105</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100700">
                    <text>Reprinted from: E. ROTHLIN (Editor), Neuro-Psychopharmacology, Vol. 2 (1961),
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale
Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum, Basle 1960
From the Discussion to the First Symposium:
THE PROBLEM OF ANTAGONISTS TO PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS

MAX FINK
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, N. Y. (U.S.A.)
’

It has been

a privilege and a pleasure to read and to listen to the reports by Drs.

and DENBER. These authors have approached the problem of antagonists
to psychotropic drugs from different vantage points: Dr. GADDUM that of the pharma—
cologist — theoretician, assessing general issues; and Dr. DENBER, the experimental
clinician with a speciﬁc problem exemplifying a theoretic principle.
Dr. GADDUM essayed a broad classiﬁcation of drug antagonisms
emphasizing
c0mpetitive inhibition. While studies of this concept have a likelihood of clarifying our
GADDUM

References p. 32.

�DISCUSSION

31

knowledge of drug action, there was little that could be speciﬁed at present. This View,
founded on extensive experience, suggests that a critical appraisal is necessary of the
and
of
relation
theories
serotonin,
fanciful
the
5—hydroxytryptophan
recent
on
many
amine oxidases, amongst others, to human psychoses. If I interpret Dr. GADDUM’s
review correctly, he is describing basic postulates which must be satisfied before drug
antagonisms are established, and such establishment is requisite to the determination
of the site of action of such interactions. Dr. GADDUM notes, that for the determination
of competitive inhibition, four considerations must be fulﬁlled, i.e.:
I. control drugs are not inhibited;
2. antagonistic actions are demonstrable at several sites or systems;
3. dose relationships are systematic; and
4. agents have a common chemical grouping.
To these I would also add, that for such determinations of competitive inhibition
to have signiﬁcance for human psycho—pharmacology, the antagonisms should
not be based on work limited to a single animal species, but should be demonstrated in man.
Dr. DENBER has approached the problem from a speciﬁc experiment — the meas—
urement of changes in various blood chemical elements and gross clinical behavior in
chronic relapsing psychotic subjects. These patients were studied before and after
intravenous mescaline followed by a variety of phenothiazine agents administered as
“antagonists”. Dr. DENBER conﬁrmed his earlier studies that various phenothiazine
derivatives, excepting diethazine, are effective in modifying mescaline clinical affects;
and that such effects are related to the halogenation of the chemical ring structure.
Parenthetically, we can conﬁrm the observation that diethazine is not an antagonist
for hallucinogens, for in our studies diethazine induced illusory states and EEG
desynchronization in psychiatric patients, similar to mescalinel.
The biochemical data indicates the wide range of behaviors altered by these
broad acting agents. Like his earlier studies on the changes in the EEG, and the observations from others of the blocking of induced psychotomimetic effects as measured in
frame—
theoretic
from
be
this
data
must
a
analyzed
etc.,
mood,
perception,
language,
work of the relevance, or imputed causal relations, of such observations to clinical
behavior. No such framework is given and the assumed connection between these
blood changes and clinical behavior is obscure. Indeed, Dr. DENBER concludes that:
“In all probability, the reactions observed represent part of a total body response
to a stress-. .
Assuming this conclusion is a reasonable working hypothesis, we are taxed by the
problem of critical experiments to elucidate the body response to psychotomimetic
and psychotropic agents. In this task we are faced by a number of monumental
problems, and it is here that Dr. GADDUM’S principles and Dr. DENBER’S experiments
approach a common base, albeit tenuous. For what Dr. GADDUM fails to indicate in
his principles are the signiﬁcant behaviors to be studied; while Dr. DENBER selects
be—
interactive
clinical
of
and
—~that
blood
of
behavior
global
chemistry
two aspects
havior — as dependent variables.
It is the selection of signiﬁcant experimental variables and their quantiﬁcation
that represents a central problem of human psychopharmacologic research today.
Assuming that the laws of human interpersonal behavior are the goals of our studies,
and that psychopharmacology represents one aspect of the modiﬁcation of human
References

12.

32.

�FIRST SYMPOSIUM

32

interpersonal behavior, what evidence is there that any single aspect of task behavior
is correlated with changes in interpersonal behavior induced by drugs?
I am troubled by the fact that innumerable investigations have selected a single
or few variables on the biochemical level and correlated these with a single or few
variables on the behavioral level, the selection of which is not designed to elucidate a
theoretic framework but rather based on a vague personal notion. Thus, investigator
after investigator selects pole climbing, bar pressing, conditioned avoidance, jiggle
cage movement, etc. as single variables in a wide range of animal studies; and rating
scales, self—ratings, psychomotor tasks, EEG, blood pressure, and many others in
human studies as single signiﬁcant variables. Few studies assess the relevance of these
tasks for the prediction of the direction or efﬁcacy of drug effects on interpersonal
behavior.
Other signiﬁcant problems include that of generalizing from non—psychopathic
populations to our understanding of disordered human behavior. A sub—aspect of this
problem is the generalization from one psychopathic population to another without
fully taking into account such population factors as genetic predisposition, early
organic traumata, varying acculturation processess and sociologic status upon population characteristics. These aspects may so alter the observations obtained with a
speciﬁc pharmacologic agent as to give varying, and occasionally opposite results when
similar studies are done in different settings.
Some years ago, Dr. ABRAHAM WIKLER outlined the problem facing experimental
psychopharmacologistsZ. In assessing the relation of psychopharmacology to experimental psychiatry, he recommended:
“In psychiatry we need more properly controlled studies on the comparative
effects of a variety of drugs, on the behavior of varied, but selected, homogeneous
groups of subjects, under varied but standardized experimental conditions, and with
varied but speciﬁed activities of the observer.”
In this I concur and commend it to the Collegium as the most logical beginning
to the resolution of the problems of antagonists to psychotropic agents.
REFERENCES
1
2

M. FINK, Effect of anticholinergic agent, Diethazine on EEG and behavior: signiﬁcance for
theory of convulsive therapy. A .M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat, 80 (1958) 380.
A. WIKLER, The Relation of Psychiatry to Pharmacology, Williams &amp; Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.,
I957-

Printed

in‘

The Netherlands

�‘

w33;;
érn‘msmﬁ‘

’1angmgemam: $§i~wgﬂ

.91»:

~'

‘iWMem 423d mmhm: maximmmvmﬁ

.:

{Err thwxsﬁsw
9mm:
ﬁm téﬁm,
,

.

.

1

.

Mamiew.

&gt;

�D

First

I

I

S C U 3 8

Synponiun

TH! PROBLBH'OF ANTAGOHISTS

lax 713k,

~

0

l

0.1.H.P.

TO PSYCKOTROPIC DRUGS

H.D.

Pro. tho Depart-ant o! Bxporinontal Psychintry,
Billlido Hoapitnl, clan Oaks l.!.
July hth, 1960, 3:310, Switaorland

�It
listen

has been a privilege and a pleasure to read and to
to the reports by Drs. Gaddun and Denber. These

authors have approached the problem or antagonists to
psychotropic drugs from different vantage points Dr. Gaddna that or the pharmacologist - theoretician, assess~
ing general issues; and Dr. Denber, the experimental-clinician
with a specific problen exeaplitying a theoretic principle.
—

Dr. Gaddnn essayed a breed

classification of drug antagonisns emphasising conpetitive inhibition. While studies of
this concept have a likelihood of clarifying our knowledge of
drug action, there was little that could be specified at
present.
This view, founded on extensive experience, suggests that a
critical
appraisal is necessary d’the nany recent fanciful theories on
the relation of serotonin, S—hydroxytryptephan and anine
oxidases,

alongst others, to huaan psychoses. It I interpret Dr. Gaddun's
review correctly, he is describing basic postulates which must
be satisfied before drug antagonisns are
established, and such
establishnent is requisite to the deternination of the site of
action or such interactions. Dr. Oaddna notes, that for the
determination of competitive inhibition, four considerations
nuet be fulfilled:

i.e.:

(1) control drugs are not inhibited;
(2) antagonistic actions sre demonstrable at several
sites or systems;

�To

(3) dose rslaticnships are systoaaticg and
(h) agonts hsvs a con-on cboaical grouping.
that
would
for ouch dotorsinatioos of
thoss I
also add,

coapotitivo inhibition to have significance for huaan psycho~
pharmacology, tho antagodsus should not be basod on work
bo
doaonstrablo
should
but
aniacl
a
to
spacios,
single
liaitod
in san.
Dr. Donbor has approacbad tho probloa Iron a spocitic
oxpariaont - tho aoasursaont of changoa in various blood ohsaical
closonta and gross clinical behavior in chronic rolapsiog psychotic
and
intravonous
botoro
Thoso
studiod
attor
scro
patioots
subjects.
aoscalino followed by a varicty of phonothiasino agonts adaioistorod so *antsgonists'. Dr. Donbor contirsod his oarlior studios
that various phonothiosino dorivativos, oxcspting diothasino, aro
ottoctivo in soditying aoscalins clinical atrocts; and that such
ottocts arc rolatod to tho halogonation of tho choaical ring
structuro. Paronthotically, so can contira tho cbsorvation that
diothasino is not an antagonist for hallucinogons, for in our
studios diotbasino iodacod illusory stats: and EEG dosynchronisatioc in psychiatric potiouts, aioilar to aoscalino (1).
Tbs biochoaicsl data indicatos tho aids songs of bohaviors
altorod by thoso broad acting scouts. Liko his oarlior studios?
on tho changos in tho EEG, and tho cbsorvations from othors of
tho blocking of indccod psychctoaiaotic ottocts as Ioascrod in
bo
snot
data
analysod
this
languago, aood, porcopticc, otc.,

�-3Iron a theoretic fraaevork of the relevance, or iapcted cancel
relatione, of anch obeervationa to clinical behaviour. No Inch
fraaevork ia given and the aeauaed connection between these
blood changee and clinical behavior in ebecnre. Indeed, Dr. Denber

that:
"In all probability, the reactione obaerved repreeent
part or a total body reaponee to a atreaa- ...'
leenaing thie conclnaion ie a reaeonable working hypo-»
theeie, we are taxed by the problea of critical experiaente
concludee

to elucidate the body reeponee to peyohotoaiaetic and paychetropic agent. In thia teak we are faced by a nnaber of
aonnaental probleae, and it ie here that Dr. Gaddna'e principlee
and Dr. Denber’a experiaenta approach a coaeon baae, albeit
tennoce. For what Dr. Gaddna taile to indicate in hie principlee
are the eignificant behaviore to be atodied; while Dr. Denber
eelecte two aapecta of behavior - that of blood cheaietry and
global clinical interactive behavior - aa dependent variables.
It in the eelection or significant experiaental variablee
and their quantification that repreeente a central problea o:
hnaan peyohopharaacologic reeearch today. ieanaing that the
lava o: hnaan interpereonal behavior are the goale or our etndiee,
and that paychopharnacology repreeenta one aepect of the aodification or hnaan interperaonal behavior, what evidence ie there
that any single aepect of teak behavior is correlated with ehangee
in interpereonal behavior induced by drugs?

�-1...

I on troubled by the tent thet innnnereble investicetione
heve eelected e eingle or ten veriehlee on the bieeheeioel level
end correleted theee with e eincle or ten verieblee on the
behevierel level, the eelectien or which ie not deeigncd to
elncidete e theoretic freeeeork but rether beeed on e vogue
pereenel notion. Thne, inveetigetor efter inveetigetor eelecte
pole cliebing, her preeeing, conditioned evoidence, Jigcle cege
leveeent, etc. ee eingle veriehlee in e wide reuse of enieel
etndiee; end retina ecelec, eelt-retinge, peyohoeotor teeke,
EEO, blood preeenre, end eeny othere in hneen etndiee ee single
eixnificent verieblee. rev etndiee eeeeee the relevence of these
teeke tor the prediction of the direction or etficecy o8 drug
ettecte on interpereonel behevior.
Other eigniticent prohleee include thet o: generelieing
tree non-peyohopethio populetione to our underetending of
dieordered hneen behevior. e eobaeepect of this problee is the
generelieetien free one peychopethic populetion to enother without
ench
eccount
into
populetion rectore ee genetic
teking
telly
prediepoeition, eerly orgenic tredeete, verying eccnlturetion
proceeeee end eociologio etetne upon popnletion cherecterietice.»
Theee eepeote eey eo elter the oheervetione chteined with e epecifio
phereeoologic egeet ee to give verying, end oceeeionelly opposite
reenlte when eieiler etndiee ere done in different settings.

�-5Solo yoara ago, Dr. Ahrahaa Hiklor ootlinod tho prohloa
In
aoooooiog
(2).
paychopharacologiato
oxporiaontal
facing

tho relation of poyohopharoacology to oxporioontal psychiatry,
ho roconaondods
'Iu poychiatry Io nood noro properly controllod
otndioo on tho oooparativo ottocto of a variety of drogo,
on tho behavior of variod, hot ooloctod, hologonoooo
groups or ouhaooto, undor variod hot otandardiaod

oxporiaontal conditiono, and with variod but opocitiod
activitioa of tho oboorvor.’
In this I concur, and connond it to tho collogiuo an the
aoot logical hoaiuning to tho roaolution of tho prohloao of
antagoniota to psychotropic agonto.

�1.

link, n: Effect at Antieholinergic Agent, Dietheeine3on
EEG end Behavior:
Significance fer Theory of
Convaleive Therapy.
.§_o_

2.

"‘

AHA

Arch. ﬁgural. a Pezehiet.

380‘387, 1958.

Hitler, A: The Relation of Pezphiatrz to Phernecologzl
In. Wilkins, Beltinere, 1957.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2824">
                <text>Problems of antagonists to psychotropic drugs, 30-2 (Discussion, Neuropsychologic response patterns of some psychotropic drugs).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2825">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2826">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-51-017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2827">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2828">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2829">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2830">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2831">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from: E.ROTHLIN (Editor), Neuro-Psychopharmacology, Vol. 2 (1961), Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum, Basle 1960 From the Discussion to the First Symposium: THE PROBLEM OF ANTAGONISTS TO PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2832">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2833">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74485">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81046">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87607">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94168">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="280" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="71">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/fdd65cffa7365ba9ca6ade8a0f3f6e8b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>60ce7c5bb093bf1402d25c650f359a34</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100697">
                    <text>PROCNOSTIC VALUE OF RORSCHACH CRITERIA IN CLINICAL
RESPONSE TO CONVULSIVE THERAPY
ROBERT

L. KAHN, PH.D., and MAX FINK, MD.
ABSTRACT

In this study of the relationship between premorbid personality factors
and clinical responses to convulsive therapy, the Rorschach test was admin—
istered to 87 unselected patients prior to the beginning of EC T. A favorable
clinical response to ECT was observed in subjects whose Rorschach records
revealed a basically conventional and unimaginative personality, generally
lacking in empathy, introspectiveness or facility of verbal communication.
Post-treatment records (of 41 patients) showed no signiﬁcant changes. It is
therefore concluded that Rorschach patterns reﬂect basic personality rather
than prevailing mood or type of illness. These results indicate that Rorschach
patterns can be useful adjuncts in the selection of patients for convulsive
therapy.

In a series of studies of convulsive therapy
we have observed marked individual differences in behavioral response. It has been
shown that the induction of a behavioral
change is related to the presence of altered
brain function;5 Yet, among those with
equivalent degrees of physiologic change,
there are still differences in the clinical patterns of behavior. While some patients become hypomanic, others show paranoid reactions, withdrawal, increased somatization or

expressions of fear.3
We have postulated that personality is one
of the signiﬁcant factors affecting this variability. This hypothesis was tested in a previous study,6 in which each patient’s premorbid personality was evaluated by means of
structured interviews with members of his
family and with the patient himself. We

found that the patients who were rated as
recovered or much improved after electroshock treatment were those with the follow-

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., New York.
'This study was supported in part by Research
Grant M—927 from the National Institute of Mental
Health, US. Public Health Service.
Presented at meeting of the Electroshock Research
Association, San Francisco, May 11, 1958.

ing personality pattern: they were generally
nonempathic, nonintrospective, verbally noncommunicative, highly conventional and
stereotyped, with little imagination or creative capacity.
The concepts derived from these observations lend themselves to study by other methods. In the present study the Rorschach test,
another measure of personality, was used. The
Rorschach technique has particular advantages in that it is both an instrument for testing the patient directly and, at the same time,
a standardized procedure providing data
which can be veriﬁed by others.
The speciﬁc purpose of the present study
was to determine: (1) the relationship between Rorschach ﬁndings and personality aspects previOusly fOund to be signiﬁcant in
family interviews; and (2) the applicability
of Rorschach criteria in the prognosis of the
clinical response to convulsive therapy.
METHOD

The population consisted of 87 consecutive,
unselected patients referred for convulsive
therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. All
patients received electroconvulsive therapy
(with either unidirectional or alternating-current instruments) three times a week. A mini242

Reprinted from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No. 5, May—June, 1960

�l

960

mum Of 12 treatments was given, with the
staff psychiatrist in charge of the treatment
determining the ﬁnal number on the basis of
clinical criteria. The improvement evaluation,
made by the staff psychiatrist, was based on
the patient’s behavior in the hospital setting
during the period of two to four weeks following termination of treatment. In this manner each patient was rated as either much improved, moderately improved Or unimproved.
As previously described,5 patients were
rated “much improved” if they no longer
showed the symptoms which had brought
them into the hospital; if, in addition, their
doctors felt they were better; and if the
nurses’ notes conﬁrmed such aspects as ability
to sleep without medication, better appetite,
and improved capacity to get along with other
patients and participate in hospital activities.

“Moderately improved” patients typically
showed some symptomatic relief (i.e., acute
depressive features might be gone), but not
the dramatic changes so evident in the ﬁrst
group. Each of these patients continued to
show some noticeable disturbance such as
obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas or somatic preoccupation. In the “unimproved”
patients, change was either not clearly noticeable or only equivocal or transient. Some
showed ﬂuctuations in behavior, at times appearing somewhat improved; but the change
was not sustained, so that by the end of treatment they appeared much the same as before.
The Rorschach test was given to each patient prior to the beginning of electroconvulsive therapy and, in 41 cases, two weeks
after electroconvulsive therapy. The Ror—
schach records were scored according to the
criteria of Klopfer and Kelley.9 Only those
common components were studied, however,
which could be analyzed quantitatively.
These included:
Total number of responses.
2. Per cent whole responses (responses in
which a subject uses all of a card for the formation of a concept).
3. Per cent form responses (responses in
which the shape of the blot is the sole determinant in the concept formation).
1.

243

JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

Number of content categories included
in the responses.
5. Number of movement responses (references to any action or movement).
6. Per cent popular responses (responses
statistically given most frequently to a particular blot area).
7. Presence or absence of shading responses (responses in which a subject incorporates the darker and lighter aspects of a
blot into his description).
8. Type of movement responses (e.g., human movement, animal movement, etc.).
9. Type of color responses (responses in
which the color in a blot plays a recognizable
role in the concept formation; when form and
color are both signiﬁcant, color-form [CF] or
form-color [FC] is scored, depending on the
predominant inﬂuence).
4.

RESULTS

The relation of the various Rorschach factors to clinical changes following ECT is
shown in Tables I-IV.
In Table I, comparison is made between
those patients who were rated as having a
good clinical response and those whose response was moderate or poor. The much improved patients had signiﬁcantly fewer total
number of responses, and signiﬁcantly more
per cent whole and form responses.
TABLE I
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS TO CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(NUMBER, PER CENT WHOLE, PER CENT FORM
RESPONSES)

Number of Responses
Much Improved (38)

Mean

S.D.

13.0

6.7

Moderate or
Unimproved
(48) 19.5 12.8
Per Cent Whole Responses
Much Improved (38) 87.6 21.0

Moderate or
Unimproved
(48)
Per Cent Form Responses
Much Improved (38)
Moderate or
Unimproved

(48)

Signiﬁcant at .05 level
** Signiﬁcant at .01 level
*

24.4

18.2

71.8

19.0

61.9

21.4

Diff.

t,

6.5

2.7 *"

13.

3.0 H

9.9

2.2

*

�244

JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

An analysis of content categories, move-

ment responses and popular responses (presented in Table II) reveals that there were
signiﬁcantly fewer content categories and
movement responses, and a greater per cent
of popular responses in the Rorschach records
of the much improved patients, as compared
with the records of the unimproved and mod—
erately improved groups.
As shown in Table III, the much improved
patients were also less likely to have any kind
of shading response. This table also presents
an analysis of the different types Of movement
and color responses. Those patients who gave
human~movement (M) responses had the
TABLE II
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS To CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(CONTENT CATEGORIES, MOVEMENT AND PER CENT
POPULAR RESPONSES)
t.
Mean
Diff.
SD.

Number of Content Categories
Much Improved (38)
3.8
Moderate or
Unimproved
4.9
(48)
Number of Movement Responses
Much Improved (38)
2.3
Moderate or
Unimproved
4.9
(48)
Per Cent Popular Responses
Much Improved (38) 37.7
Moderate or
Unimproved

(48)

26.6

2.2

2.7
5.1

21.6

poorest clinical responses (28% much improved), while those with no movement of
any kind had the best clinical results (63%
much improved). Patients with animal-movement (FM) or inanimate-movement (In) responses were rated better than those with
human movement but not as well as those
with no movement at all. With respect to
color, those patients with form-color (FC) responses had the poorest results; those with no
color at all, the best—although patients with
CF or C responses did almost as well.
In Table IV the patients are grouped according to combinations of human-movement
(M) and form-color (FC) responses. Of
those who had both M and FC, only 17% were
rated as much improved; 25% were considered
unimproved. In contrast, of those with neither
M nor FC, 66% were much improved and only
3% were unimproved. The
ratings of the group
with one or the other of these determinants
(M or F C) fell in between.
As

2.3

11.1

2.8

14.3

*

Signiﬁcant at .05 level
"* Signiﬁcant at .01 level

MAY-JUNE

mentioned, post-treatment records

were obtained from 41 patients. Comparison
of the pre—treatment and post-treatment records of these patients revealed little change
in the types of responses found. With respect
to human movement (M), for example, 34 of
the records showed no change. In four cases
patients with M responses prior to treatment
H showed none afterward; three other patients
with no M response had such response following treatment. These small changes could be
expected on a chance basis.

TABLE III
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS TO CLINICAL RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(SHADING, MOVEMENT AND COLOR)
Total No.
Much Improved
Moderately Improved
Un improved
Shading
46
15 (33%)
20 (43%)
11
(24%)
No Shading
40
23 (58%)
15 (38%)
2 ( 5%)

x2

= 8.12

p&lt;.02

Human Movement (M)
Animal Movement (FM)
and/or Inanimate
Movement (In)

39

11

(28%)

19

(49%)

9

(23%)

29

16

(55%)

9

(31%)

4

No Movement

(14%)

19

12

(63%)

FOrm-Color (FC)

7

(37%)

X2

=

10.49

p&lt;.05

Color-Form (CF)
and/or Pure
Color (C)

34

7

(21%)

18

(53%)

9

(26%)

27

16

(59%)

8

(30%)

3

No Color

(11%)

26

16

(62%)

.

(35%)

1

(

.

_

&gt;

x2

= 14.98

p&lt;.01

4%)

�JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

I960
TABLE IV

RELATION 0F RORSCHACH FACTORS To CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(HUMAN MOVEMENT AND FORM-COLOR)
Much
Total
Moderately
Human

Improved Unimproved

Movement
(M) and
Form-Color

No.

Improved

(FC)

24
25

4 (17%)
10 (40%)

14 (58%)
9 (36%)

6 (25%)
6 (20%)

38

25 (66%)

12 (32%)

1

FC
Neither M
nor FC

M or

M

and FC vs. M or FC vs. Neither M nor F0:

M

and

X2

WC

vs. Neither M nor FR:

.‘(1’

=

-:

17.82
12.26

(

3%)

p&lt;.01
p&lt;.00]

EPICBISIS

The results of this study conﬁrm the findings previously reported concerning the relationship of personality to clinical response
after convulsive therapy. Patients who had a
good clinical result showed Rorschach records
characterized by few responses and little variety of content, no shading or movement or
color responses, and a high percentage of
whole, form and popular responses. This kind
of record indicates a personality pattern
which is nonempathic, nonintrospective, verbally noncommunicative, highly conventiOnal
and stereotyped and with little manifestation
of imagination or creative capacity. These
characteristics are identical with those described in the previous study based on interviews with family members.6
The prognostic value of the Rorschach as a
clinical instrument is demonstrated by these
data. While there are a number of studies in
the literature on the prognostic value of the
Rorschach in somatic therapy, the results have
not been consistent. Rabin,13 for example,
states that “single Rorschach factors cannot
serve . . . as predictors of improvement.” On
the other hand, Piotrowski12 describes specific prognostic criteria. It is likely that the
difference in point of view, as well as in the
varying criteria offered, reﬂects differences in
the type of population and the variety of somatic treatment observed. Despite these problems, however, those studies 12’ 14 with the
largest series of patients have obtained results
similar to those of the present study. For ex—
ample, their data show that the absence of

245

human movement (M) is more often associated with a favorable clinical response, and
that patients with form-color (FC) responses
are more likely to have a poor result.14
The signiﬁcance of our findings might be
questioned on the basis that we have demonstrated a relationship merely between clinical
response and type of illness, rather than between clinical response and personality pattern. This objection would appear to be sup1“
4’10'1‘1
the
studies
ported by
numerous
which have reported that depressed patients.
the most likely candidates for convulsive
therapy, show no human-movement or color
responses. Our observations, however, substantiated by other studies,1’7!8’“’ Show a
constancy of the Rorschach before and after
treatment, and indicate that the response pattern reﬂects aspects of the basic personality
rather than transient features such as the prevailing mood or type of illness.
REFERENCES

l. Beck,

S. J.: Arch. Neurol. &amp;

1943.
2. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.:

3.
4.
5.

6.

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.

Psychiat. 50:483.

AMA. Arch. Neurol.

i7 Psychiat, 78:516-525, 1957.
Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: paper presented at
meeting of A.P.A., New York, 1957.
Cuirdham, A.: Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 16:130—
145, 1936.
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
AMA. Arch. Neurol. b Psychiat, 76:23—29.
1956.
Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: I. Neurop.sychiat., 1:
45-50, 1959.
Kelley, D. M., Margolis, H., and Barbera, S. E.:
Rorsch. Res. Exch., 5:35-43, 1941.
Kisker, C. W.: I. Aim. (J Soc. Psychol., 37:120—
124, 1942.
Klopfer, B., and Kelley, D.: The Rorschach
Technique, World Book Co., New York, 1942.
Levy, D. M., and Beck, S. J.: Am. J. Orthopsy—
chiat., 4:31—42, 1934.
Pacella, B. L., Piotrowski, Z., and Lewis, N. I).
G: Am. J. Psychiat., 104:83-91, 1947.
Piotrowski, Z.: Psychiat. Quart, 14:267-273.
1940; 15:807—822, 1941.
Rabin, A. 1.: Am. Psychol., 2:284, 1947.
Rees, W. L., and Jones, A. M.: J. Ment. Sc., 97:
681-689, 1951.

H.: Psychodiagnostics, Crune &amp;
Stratton, New York, 1942.
16. Varvel, W. A.: Bull. Menninger Clin., 5:5-12,

15. Rorschach,

1941.

�Pragmatic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical
Beeponse

to Convulsive 'Iherapy

Robert L. Kahn Ph.D. and

From

Max

Fink M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

L.I., NJ.
Aided, in part,

by grant

Public Health Service.

M

927, National

Institute of

Mental Health, U.S.

Presented at the Electroshock Research Association, San Francisco,
May 11, 1958.
5-5-58

�Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Glynical
Response
RObert L.

to Convulsive Therapy

W

Phone and Max Fink

In a series of studies of convulsive therapy

MOD.

we have

observed marked

individual differences in behavioral response. It has been shown that the
induction of a behavioral change is related to the presence of altered
brain function (2, 5). Yet, among those with equivalent degrees of
physiologic change, there are

still

differences in the clinical patterns

of behavior. While some patients became hypcmanic, others show paranoid

reactions, withdrawal, increased somatization or expressions of fear (3).
we have

postulated that personality is one of the significant factors

affecting this variability. This hypothesis has been tested in a previous
study using structured interviews with members of the patient's family (6).

It

was

reported that patients

who were

rated as recovered or

much improved

following treatment were generally non-empathic, non-introspective, non-

verbally communicative, highly conventional and stereotyped, with
imagination or creative capacity.
The concepts

derived from these observations lend themselves to study

by other methods.

used

little

in this study.

The Rorschach

test, another

The Rorschach

measure of

personality,

technique had the advantages both of

testing the patient directly and of being a standardized procedure
providing data which could be verified by otherS.
The

specific purpose of the present study

was

to determine:

1) the relationship between Rorschach findings and personality

aspects previously found to be significant in family

interviews, and

was

�.2.2) the application of Rorschach

criteria in the prognosis of

the clinical response to convulsive therapy.
METHOD:

The

population consisted of 86 consecutive, unselected patients

referred for convulsive therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. All patients
received electrocommlsive therapy three times a week, using either

midirectional or alternating current instruments.

A

minimmn

of 12

treatments was given, with the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the

treatment determining the final number

on the

The improvement exraluation was made by

basis of clinical criteria.

the supervising psychiatrist

the patient's behavior in the hospital setting in a period
to four weeks following the termination of treatment. In this

and was based on

of two

patient

manner each

was

rated as either

much improved,

moderately improved

criteria previously described (5).
Each patient was given the Rorschach test in the standard mnner in
the week prior to treatment. This data constituted the main focus of this

or unimproved, using

study.

To

determine

however, the

of treatment.

test

was

stability

of the Rorschach pattern with treatment,

readministered two weeks following the termination

�RESULTS :

A.

Relatim of Rorschach Factors to Clinical
The Rorschach

records were scored according to the criteria

of Klopfer and Kelley (9). (July these
however, which could be analyzed

total

Change:

common components were

studied,

quantitatively. These included

of responses, 2) per cent whole reSponses, 3) Per
cent form responses, )4) number of content categories included in the

1)

number

responseS,

5) number of movement responses,

6) per cent popular

responses, 7) presence or absence of shading responses,
movement reaponses, and

8) type of

9) type of color responses.

In Table I the comparison is

made between

those patients

who were

clinical response and those whose reSponse was
moderate or poor. The much improved patients had significantly fewer
number of responses, and significantly more per cent whole and form
rated as having a

responses .

good

�TABLE

I

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical Response in Convulaive Therapy:
Number, Per Cent Whole, Per Cent Form Responses

Number

Mean

§_:_D_o

(38)

13.0

6.7

(h8)

19.5

12.8

of Resmnses

Much Improved

Moderate or
UnimProved

Diff.
6.5

L
2.7

*‘hL

Per Cent Whole Resmnse
Much Improved

(38)

37.6

21.0

Moderate or
Unimproved

(ha)

2h.h

18.2

(38)

71.8

19.0

(ha)

61.9

21 .h

13 .2

3.00

*4:"

Per Cent Form Resoonse
Much

anrorved

Moderate or
Unmproved

9.9

2.2 *

as

Significant at .05 level

*"‘

Significant at .01 level

�-5significantly fewer content categories in the Rorschach
records in the much improved patients. (TableJI). They also demonstrated
There were

fewer movement and a greater per cent of popular responses, than the
unimproved and moderately improved groups.

TABIEII

of
have
kind
to
less
any
likely
patients
shading responses, as shown in Table III. In this table the comparison is
also shown for the different types of movement and. color responses. Those
patients who had human movement responses (M) had the poorest clinical
were also

The much improved

had the best

results

inanimate movement
movement

improved), while those with no movement of any kind

(28% much

reaponses

(63% much

(m)

improved). Patients with animal

(FM)

or

reaponses were rated better than those with human

but not as well as those without any movement at

all.

With

respect to color, those patients with form color (F0) reaponses had the
poorest results, “those with no color at all the best, although patients
with

CF

or

C

responses did almost as well.
TABLE

III

�.6.
TABLEII

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Ciinical Response in Convulsive ’Iherapy:
Content Categories, Movement and Per Cent Poplgar Responses

Number

$.13.

(38)

3.8

2.2

(he)

h.9

2.3

Diff.

of Content Categories

Much Improved
Mod

Mean

erate or

Unimproved

iﬂ,

1.1

2.1

2.6

**
2.7

11.1

*

Number of Moveme‘ot Responses
Much Improved

(38)

2.3

2.7

Moderate or
Unimproved

(hi3)

h.9

5.1

(38)

37.7

21.6

(h8)

26.6

1h.3

Per Cent Pomar Responses
Much Improved

Moderate, or
Unimproved

* Significant
**

2.8

V.

at .05 level

Signiﬁcant at .01 level

�$3

g

3

35
N

8.V.

$8

335

m

a

m

$8

o
menu;H

m

Amaav

305

m

H

SVQ

”ummnony

wmbommﬁH

NH.w

32

n

n

0

«N

«x

NM

QQOJH

mmeazpaoo

gs
ca
Nampwhmcos

$5

€09

“Rm:

N.

3

a

m

Ammmv

Ammov

Amawv

Ammmv

HH

ma

NH

N

0H

RS

Amwv

8d

Amos

ﬁg:

“many

3.5

ma

3

m

383

Rammv

,mH

mu

$5

85

8

noaoo
omcbmmmm

HHH

cam
[chlmnm¢ﬂ
Hmowawao

unmsmboz

on

\xﬁmmmV
cabommgH

Awmev

myopowm

ﬁnﬁm

sou:

ma

nomnomnom

mo

mbwpmamm

I!

RE

AEhv

Aumv

upmaﬁuu¢m

pumsmboz

Amuv

ASV
chum

303%:

on

such
pamembnx

gamma
pmoswboz

wﬁuﬂm

02

g

noaoo

hoaoo_suom

n0\unm

noxnnm
amewq&lt;

noaoo

hoaoo

oz

oz

�-8In Table IV the patients were grouped according to combinations
of

H

and

rated as

FC

responses.

01‘

those

who had both

much improved and 25% were

of those with neither

M

nor

M

and

PC

only

1775

were

considered mimproved. In contrast,

EC, 66% were much improved and

only

3%

were

improved. The ratings of the group with one or the other of these

deteminants

fell in

between.

unnuumm
TABLES

IV

W...‘.
B. chnErison of Pre- and Posttreatment Records

Posttreatment records were obtained from hl patients. These
showed

little

difference from the types of responses found prior to

treatment. .fith respect to

human movement (M),

for example,

recorﬂs shared no change. In four cases patients with
none afterwards;
follow-ring

three other patients with no

treatment.

M

M

3h of the

responses showed

response had such response

�«a.
TABLE IV

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical Response in Convulsive Therapy:
Human Movement SM) and Form

Color

$130)

Rorschach
___N__

M

and

M

or

FC

F0

Neither

M

M

nor

FC

and FC/Neither Mmr

Much Improved

(21:)

h

(25)

10

(ho%)

(38)

25

(6655

FC

(17%)

Moderateg ImEroved

W
6

(25%)

(36%)

6

(20%)

(32%)

1

(3%)

1h

(58%)

9
12

x2

=

x2

- 12.26

17.82

p

&lt;

p.&lt;;

.01
.001

�.10..
DISCUSSION:

this study confirm the ﬁndings previously reported
concerning the relationship of personality to clinical response after
convulsive therapy. Patients who had a good clinical result showed
The

results

of

Rorschach records characterized by few responses and

content, no shading or

movement or

little variety

of

color reaponse, and a high percentage

of whole, form and popular reSponses.

This pattern indicates a personality

pattern which i s non-empathic, non-introspective, non-verbally cormunicative,
highly conventional and stereotyped and with little manifestation of
imagination or creative capacity. These aspects are identical with these
described in the previous study based on interviews with family members (6).
The

prognostic value of the Rorschach as a clinical instrument is

demonstrated by

this data. ifhile there are a

number

of studies in the

literature on the prognostic value of the Rorschach in somatic therapy,
the results have not been consistent. T:Jhile Rabin (3), for example, has
stated that "single Rorschach factors cannot serve ... as predictors of
improvement ," Piotrowski has described specific prognostic criteria (12).
It is likely that the difference in point of view, as well as in the
varying criteria offered, reflects differences in the type of population
and the varieties of somatic treatment observed. Despite these problerns,
however, the results of those studies with the largest series of patients
report similar observations to those in the present study. For
example, their data shows that the absence of human movement (M) is more
(12,

114)

often associated with a favorable clinical response, and that patients

�.uwith

F0

responses are more likely to have a poor result (1h).

The

that

significance of these results might

be

questioned on the basis

clinical response and
type of illness rather than ﬂue personality pattern. In this regard
numerous studies have reported that depressed patients, the most likely
candidates for convulsive therapy, show no human movement or color
we

have demonstrated a

reSponses (h, 10, 15, 16).
by other

relationship

Our

studies (1, 7, 8, 11),

after treatment,

between

observations, however, substantiated
show a constancy

of the Rorschach before

indicate that the reSponse pattern reflects
aspects of the basic personality rather than transient features as the

and

prevailing

mood

and

or type of illness.

�SUMMARY.AND CONCLUSION:

1. Eighty-seven unselected cases referred for convulsive therapy
were administered a Rorschach

test prior to,

and two weeks following,

treatment.

2.

A

favorable clinical response was observed in subjects with

pretreatment records characterized by few responses, a small number of
content categories, absence of shading, movement and color responses

(particularly lack of

human movement and form

color), and a high percentage

of whole, form and popular reSponses.
This data confirms previous observations on the

3.

personality factors to clinical

outcome

relation of

in convulsive ﬂierapy.

favorable evaluation is most likely in patients

who

A

are predominantly

non-empathic, non-introSpective, nonaverbally communicative, highly

conventional and stereotyped, with

little

imagination or creative capacity.

significant

change

in Rorschach records obtained

There was no

A.

It is

that pretreatment Rorschach patterns
in this population reflect the basic personality rather than the prevailing

following treatment.
mood

concluded

or type of illness.
5.

can be

patterns, by providing a set of prognostic criteria,
useful adjuncts in the selection of patients for convulsive

therapy.

Rorschach

�.13-

2.‘

Fink,

3.

and Katm, R.L.: Relation of
Electroencephalographic Delta
Activity to Behavioral Response in Ele ctroshoclc, A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. 8: P_s,zchiat., IQ: 516-525 (1957).

A

M.

Behavioral Patterns with Induced States of
tered Brain Function, Div. Meeting A.P.A. (New York 1957).
:

14.

Guirdham, A.: Diagnosis of Depression by
Med. Psycho . _1_§: 130-115 (1936).

5.

Kahn,

the Rorschach Test, Brit. J.

R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Bnprovement in Electroshock, A.M.A.
Arch.
Neurol.
and Psychiat. 1g: 23-29 (1956).

,: Personality

7.
8.

9.
10.
11.
12.

Factors in Behavioral Reaponse to
Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neural. (in press)
Kelley, D.M., Margolis, H. and Barbara, S.E.:
of
the
Stability
Rorschach Method as Demonstrated in Electric Comrulsive
Therapy
Cases, Rorsch. Res. Exch., 5: 35-143 (19M).
Kisker, G.W.: A Projective Approach to Personality Patterns
During
Insulin-Shock and Metrazol-Convulsive Therapy, J. Abn. &amp;
Soc.
21: 120“12)4 (19112).

mo:

Klopfer, B. and Kelley, D.: The Rorschach Technigue. (World Book
Co. , New York 19h2).

levy,

D.M. and Beck

Psychosis,

Am.

S.J.:

Rorschach Test in Manic-Depressive
J. Orthops‘gchiat” ll: 314:2 (19311).
The

Pacella, B.L., Piotrowski, Z. and Lewis, N.D.C.: The Effects of
Electric Convulsive Therapy on Certain Personality Traits
in
Psychiatric Patients, Am. J. Psvchiat. 1011: 83—91 (19M).

Piotrwski, Z.:

A

Simple Experimental Device

for the Prediction

Quart., lg: 267-273 (1910);
Aid in the Insulin Shock Treatment of
Schizophrenia,
Psychiat.
Quart. 15: 807—822 (19141).

�REFERENCES

13. Rabin, A.I: Effects of Electric Shock Treatment upon Some Aspects
of Personality and Intellect, Am. PsEhol. g: 281; (1911?).

lb.

Rees, W.L. and Jenes, A.M.: An Evaluation of the Rorschach Test as
a Prognostic Aid in the Treatment of Schizophrenia by Insulin
Coma Therapy, Electronarcosis, Electroconvulsive Therapy and
Leucotomy, J. Ment. Sci. 97: 681-689 (1951).

15. Rorschach, H.: Psydhodiagnostics (Grune

Stratton,

The Rorschach Test in Psychotic and
Manninger 01111., S: 5'12 (19,41)-

16. Varvel, MtA.:

Bull.

&amp;

New

York, 19h2).

Neurotic Depressions,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2794">
                <text>Prognostic value of Rorschach criteria in clinical response to convulsive therapy. J Neuropsychiatr. 1960 May-Jun; 1:242-5.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2795">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2796">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-48-014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2797">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2798">
                <text>Kahn, Robert; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2799">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2800">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2801">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No. 5, May—June, 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2802">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2803">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74482">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81043">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87604">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94165">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6725" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3782">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e5d103cbe3dc9cd93159ddec488b3ecc.pdf</src>
        <authentication>022eaace568b7d0816980adc5ccaa74c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="104408">
                    <text>�nau-

mmmmtmw.mumntwmsm

Mmammmmawmatmmmummm

mmmwmmawmmwmmmamuwum
uwmmummmmmm. mammmmipwh
umummonm. mwwumwamm

vamwwmhym.mmm.

mmuummmmmmmmww
mmmmmmwmmuormmmm
1.

Wanna-m

mmmummwummwtw
wommwmmmumzmmmmmm
mamawaum. itmhmmummum
wm.mmm1mmmwm.mm,mmmm

Wm

W
W

M

as th-

an M: to» Manama.
at Bra. 13.311.313.31, a «mud

mam-1.
m

mgm.mmmmmmmﬁam.mmmruuw

u1wmmmamwmmmtmmmm. M
mmwmmmgmmwummmuzmw. m
W‘M‘MWMWmmwMWMMdm
msMMMmMmm-cmaammm.m
1mm».
smu‘mmmmuwmmmmmm
umwmmmwmdmmwwnmmm
mwumwmuwmwmamummuum.
'

mmummmmmmmwuammmm
ammmmam~mummdummum

mwummnmmmm.

�03¢

unmmmumswummmammau

wthmquduWMuMdehu-W

atmwmummthummmu-mum
ﬂat “mm. ”mum, mum... 'm man-om.
mm:
mmmummmmmmpmnymm
and

a;

W13M.Wﬂ
a.

WWW
mimnmmtmmmatﬁmmm

W(mm)maamum. Wmmmmm
minituamtmﬂtmmlymmsum.
mmmmmmmmmtmmanm M

1(th

m.w.muammmmammuumm

ﬂaw.

maem,nnmmwgmnhmtmnmu
Madmanhdtnmmmm. nmmmm,mm
Mmtmm)mmlwwm.nm,mmmnum
nu mm“ m madam ( mm mm. 31WCW319511}.
in.

thWWWMtWWthqu
man
up
man.
um),
mum
m
by the

(at... P.

mm um),
WMWWW‘WuM): Wmmmtzmm
mﬁmleohtaM
(mu.

3»

a.»

scam mum (in. A. mm) m:

mm
mm mm m

afﬁrm!

1*»

the

mama about»:

mlmumtomammumwmmmm

mmmuwmmumdmm mommamm

mwmmmmammmm

�ah-

m.nmmmmtm.amahmummm

mammwmmwmmumarmmmwnmwmm

ww-wwmmumzwmmmmdm-

mummmmmmm Ammaomwmt
.

mumermmmmmmd. mammalian
”wind to: m :mm mm, W Wm m1 momma-g.

Wammmmormmmw

mmmmmmmuma,mmmm
wuunmmu.m«smmormum. mummm

monarwmm,wmm9r£mgmtmrormwa

Wcmmummmuamumwm.
nmmuumymawwwmm
W..1tmwmtm‘uitr1nhmdmhm
mmmammmm. Mmmmemdin

mommmum. num-mmmummmu

immiwﬂmmmmg

nmwmmm.m.mmmwwm

mmwmmmotmummmmmmmm

PM!»

mmmmimhﬁmotuMMiﬂthmhm

wmmummmwmmmmnww
wwwmmtawmummwmwm.
Pu

WW
hammmwmamummmaaw

WWhmamﬁSﬁmmmnu-ammnh
«ma-W'mmmwmmhnmmmwmm hmuuaummumMmmwrm-um

unmmmm,m.m,wmmummm

��.ﬁ‘

V

mum
mum.
mm
am-ammummmrmmmam
ummmmmmmnmw
hr mum iii. W mumt WM AM}. 1955.
www.mmmmarumwanm
mnmwmmmwmmumummuw
mmmu‘mummm‘
WW.
8.
mMMMMWWWhNWW‘
mu m

in
nan-mm
m

:15

7.»

WW

Mmemm
3»

mm

.mumwmummmwbmmmmwm
«mmgmumﬂormwmwmmwu
mummuuwotmmumm
9'9me”.
mammmmdmuuatmummmmum

murwmwmuwuwmmmnr
ammmxmysa.

��Dr. Fink

January 18, 1955

To:

All Department Heads

'Re:

Annual Report

Please prepare
Report

all

-

l95h

of your data for the 195h Annual

at the earliest possible date.

All tables and other information should be turned in

to Mrs. Bailey, Office Manager, on or before February 10.

uith your statistical data, Dr. Miller requests
that in addition to any tables or general statistics
which you will furnish, that you write a succinct out—
line of the'work of your department for the calendar
which
comments
in
appeared
the
to
similar
l9Sh,
year
Along

the last Annual Report for your department. Please
submit

all

data in three copies.

I think that will be
Report in.March of this

With everyone's cooperation,

able to publish the Annual

year.
a report of

I
vities of the hospital similar to the
would

like you to

Janua RY 19 meeting.

make

all

research'acti—

one given

Maurice Bachrach

Administrator.

Mled

at the

�(33L
Biochemical Research

Material assistance was offered the laboratories during 1954
in the form of enlarged quarters, and by the award of a two-year
grant from the National Institutes of Health. The program initiated
the previous year by Dr. Harry Goldenberg, Director of Laboratories,
was continued along the following lines:

Clinical

Methodoloww

It

has become abundantly clear that the clinical laboratory can
no longer cope with the special problems of mental disease using ther
standard chemical tests carried out in general hospitals. Consequently
increased attention has been directed towards providing the clinical
laboratory with procedures for testing adrenal and carbohydrate
metabolic function as well as for determining the course of drug
and shock therapy. Reference has previously been made to ketosteroid
and corticoid analyses. A new direct colorimetric test for hormone
conjugates is nearing completion. Rapid micromethods have alib been
perfected for two standard analyses, viz. blood phosphorus and
which have hitherto been subject to large experimental
phosphatase,
A
simple technique is also being investigated for following
errors.
the course of chlorpromazine excretion in urine.
Metabolism of Steroid Sulfate Conjugates
Impetus to our earlier studies on the metabolism of sulfuric
acid—bound steroid hormones has been furnished by an InStitute of
Health Grant which makes provision for much needed equipment and
simple
personnel. At the outset of the grant period a remarkably
method was discovered for the colorimetric assay of steroid sulfates,
based on the use of basic dyes. Further inquiry shows that, aside
from its use in enzyme research, the method offers great promise for
the assay of bound steroids in blood and urine as an index of
these
lines.
Studies
along
continuing
are
stress.
physiological
Mechanism of Action of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide

and
from
drawn
have
been
vitro
conclusions
inc preliminary
ig
which
induces
LSD
mode
25,
a
of
of
drug
action
on
the
vivo
studies
in
a—transient psychotic state:
(l) LSD 25 is a powerful inhibitor of human serum cholinesterase.
(2) Parallel with a definitive response by the individual receiving
LSD 25 there is a rise 11),..38rum alpha keto acids.
Hormone Assay with Enzyme Systems
There appears to be little doubt but that hormones are implicated
The
in
establishing
deterrent
prime
mental
aberrations.
and
emotional
in
of
for
of
assay
suitable
procedures
this relationship is the lack
.

�function. Were such procedures available it should be possible
to catalog mental illness on a chemical basis and suggest corrective
action as an adjunct to the psychiatric services.
Since the effect of hormones on various organs is mediated via
enzyme systems, an extended study has been undertaken into the
The
hormone
for
systems
isolated
enzyme
of‘using
assay.
possibilitywould
involve incubating the test fluid with the appropriate
procedure
enzyme system in a test tube, and then determining the degree to
which the enzymes are altered by the hormone in question by measuring
conditions
the release of a colored product. To determine the choice of makuxx
been necessary to
for carrying out these measurements it has The
on
two
mathematical
studies.
papers
out
detailed
first
carry
in
Several
manuScripts
are
more
been
have
published.
this'subject of
preparation.
various stages
hormone

Bibliography
Goldenberg, Harry
"Rectification of Nonlinear Beer's
690 (1954).
Goldenberg, Harry

Law

Plots”, Anal. Chem., gg,

"Rectification of Nonlinear Enzyme Activity Curves.
Arch. Ricchem. and Biophys., §§, 288 (1954).

I. Preliminary"

�.;

and
Research
of
the
of
Publications
Department
Psychology
;/

Research in the Department of Psychology was oriented around several themes including: Refinement of psychological tests, the persis—
tent problem of schizophrenia, and the effect of maturation and agang as

measured by objective

criteria.

Certain aspects of the Rorschach test were dealt with more objectively
by a series of papers by Dr. Gurvitz and Mr. Eichler and Mr. Feinberg.
These set up for the first time objective adult standards for evaluating
many Rorschach criteria which were not available previously. Further
data was made available to experimenters illustrating the normal process
of aging and maturation to further extend the cancept that if people grow
older there are decrements in intellectual functioning and personality
ingegration.
In two new papers to be presented at the Eastern Psychological Association meeting, further progress was made in diagnosing schizophrenia by
teens of psychological tests.
The past and current research in psychology at Hillside has continued
to attract attention both in terms of the acceptability of papers in both
scientific meetings and professional journals, and also in terms of the
many hundreds of requests for reprints sent in by psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers.
These papers and research projects have also served as a training
medium for psychological internes in the Department of Psychology and the
past year was noteworthy for the fact that each one of the psychological
internes or staff members presented at least once at a psychological convention or participated in some published research.project.

��RESEARCH

During the calendar year l9Sh two projects were

in process. their families pay for hospitalization

a) Study of rates which patients and
as correlated with time Spent in the hospital.

b) The adjustment of applicants referred by psychiatrists found unsuitable
for admission to Hillside Hospital during period 1951/1953.

This latter study is a series of studies which is being done to determine the
adjustments in the community and the use of community resources for applicants
who have applied for admission to Hillside HOSpital but were found unsuitable.
It is planned to continue this series during the year 1955.

In addition, the joint project with the Jewish Community Services of long
Island concerning the placement of discharged patients in private residence
continues.

W3

research project is being set up at the Altro'work Shop to which patients
discharged from Hillside Hespital go in order to learn work habits.
A

Publications:

)/
&lt;3'“&gt;(
'21”
,~
63‘”
7
s====r
;)

Vocational Adjustment for the Emotionally Disturbed
Authors: Roland Baxt, Abraham.Lurie, and Joseph .A. Miller,
.

-

M.D.

Presentations at conferences:
a)

[pulse Pinsky presented a paper at the National Conference of Jewish Communal Service in May, 1951;, called, "The Impact of Medical Crisis on the
Family".

b)

AL:hd

‘

Abraham Lurie Spoke at the National Conference of Social‘Wbrk in may, 195h,
"The Implications for Psychiatric Social‘work of Team‘work Relationship
Between Social'workers and Psychologists".

�MEMORANDUM FROM THE

CREATIVE THERAPY DEPARTMENT

WWW

1955

Study on the constructive and/or
destructive use of passive and active aggression as a differential test for determining

schizophrenic responses.
Data for this research project had
been gathered for the past three years. Their
sifting and clinical evaluation is planned in
the near future.
The test is carried out within the
C.T. program and consists of 16 specific proand
number of

jects

EZ/r

#290

a

sub-tests.

“a
707

Ernest Zierer

�Fsbmary 2, 1955

Memorandum

from: Dr.
To:

Subject:

Fink

M.

Bondsr,

M. D.

24.1).

Anmsl Report of Hillsids Hospitals

and
medical
services
with
other
Coordination md cooperation

with the psydxiatrio staff

past you. With
in.
slsotmoncsphalogmm,
for
the
of
laboratory
sstsblishnsnt
tho
crossed use of this facility and of the consultation faoilitin m
was

incrsssed during

the:

ands by members of the resident and attsndim staff.
the
answered
attending
by
19
consultations
ssrs
the
yes“:
hiring

neurology oer-vies, and

1:0

consultations in addition vsrs anmrsd by

the rssidaxt neurologist. In the slootrosnoophahgramio laboratory
111:8

this nun":- 75 constituted consultstion
taken
rsoords
wars
the
0!
records.
maindsr,
follow-up

”cords vars taken.

rsqnssts and

01'

in tho oourss of two invsstigations

-

one

in tho effects of electro-

shosk on brain function; and the second on the

relationship between

treatinsulin
the
of
and
the
rssults
can
function
brain
in
changes

mt.
Evaluation of the organic mental mamas provided the major
with
three
Thurs
were
patients
consultations.
nourologio
Icons for
the
clinic.
followed
in
sud
who
controlled
wars
disordsrs
leisurs
Four

logic

nonrafurther
for
another
institution
to
transfsrod
sore
pstiants
work—up and

troatmnt.

when
direction
another
in
The neurologic service
nto
consultation
prior
for
aimissions
olinis
nods
tbs
tron
qussts ms

was extended

hospital admission.
your and

Sm

such

oomltstions

were dons during the

svnlustion
butts:for
s
an
upper-unity
ssrvioo
providsd
this

�of the patients problems before autumn“.
introduced to you in 1953

to evaluate organic

m

natal

The "

mail

test"

which was

mm richly used during the put year,

syndmmlg

.

�Fobmary 15', 1955

modem

Annual Report

of

Wt

of Neurology, 11111:“. Hospital

—

moperation with the psychiatric star! and other mdical gen-ion
by when of the neurology
was increased during the year.

63th

Fortyunino «nomination: by the attending neurologists, and

«agitation:

1:0

additionﬂ

were answered by the supervising neuropaychiatriut.

the eiootroenmphalographie laboratory

111:8

ream-ch

mm

m.

In

this

01'

lumber, 75 constim‘bod consultation requests and follow-up rewards.

Evaluation of the organic mantel syndrome provided the major
focus for ammlog‘io consultations. more were three patients with

mime

disorders

who

were controlled and followed in the

patients mm tranatemd to
work-up and treatment.

Hillsido in

1953 was

The

«3111116.

Four

guard hospitals for further nonmlogie
«um»; ﬁrst“ which to: introduced at

mm widely used to evaluate organic mental and»

must.
{the

mmlogic service uni also

extended when rogue“; worn

man from the admissions clinic for consultation prior to hospital
admission.
such consultations were answer-ad during the your and

Sm

this service provided
boron admission.
Under

tom

an

opporhnity for a batter evaluation of patients

of a U.S.P.H.S. grant, the electroencephalographic

laboratory was swarmed for taohirboscopy, and a number of basic nouns.
physiological problems were smdiod.

f

’13:“

��_

my}-

1955

Neurology

hmommmwumammmwumh
mes
in the visiting

a...

was noon
almond by

mm.
Wynn».

tndmtharrﬁ

m supervising

mailman

In th. metro-n

mphdographic laboratory, 210 mom an am, of which 7!; war;
consultaticn "quests. For the most put, the consultations in!" on)»

momentum
(6); pain syndma (3) and axiom cum
tit-onion (7); men-1
wt:
&gt;nenrnlng1c mum (10). 'th wk). test for organic bran dim”
Wmtinﬂpt’dnnu.
activities
mar-aura:
”sued
mm...
«momma-mt
uﬂmofuorganicmtalayﬁmﬂﬂ

ingpmmo.

mmormmmmommsmemzm

“Wmtmmmum
var.

mammotmmpaum

fonmddnringthairtmmtﬂth

aerial

Wanndawmtem.

numﬂtamsoam.tunmnn¢mdnmmm

ammunmummmmmmmmamm
mummiﬁufornm

�"...

u. p.-..

“N...
.

.

N,

~

mm .mu—mww."

wwmmw’mwm.

.,

W,

.vnx—

“‘Wn"

.7

m

as: u.-

momma!
Dr. H1110?

TO:

Dr. H. Fink

RESEARCH SERVICE,

smcrmmmya-pm-m.

Dummmtharmmhthemmamanumwmume

.

in organizing an mom nhctmshook

2mm,
the

and the

mam,

the

mm
m

Scrpuil project. Considerable mm

electron-Museum laboratczy,

and

sum

Public Health Bunion for adds!

lamb

Grant

“97.

penis“ w

mm

in

project with Dr.
spout in letting up

WMar

by the

equipment

mud

thu

no

,

Fonoving discussion with Dr. Embers and Dr.

known,

Dr. LnQuor

Wimudtoviaitiﬂllgidumdmmmm..Dr.LIQm15mchup
of the Luann unit at Grandma: State Hospital.

a: March 9th, Dr's. numbers,

mum and melt mum cm:- to as Dr. hQuor'I mam unit.

m

intended in his

that. Vinita, the

use or

split

mm mm: to induce com.

mm.

This '11]. be

mm

RobertluhnandnvaeuvisiudDr. hulﬂoehandnr.
thhtric Imtituto chitin-$133M. Wﬂaittonr. WWW
Dr.

undue for the

nut

Following

Med research emanate. at. Dr. Blmbarga suggestion din-

mud a similar project ban, and the protocol was
prumtod at the nut numb can-dun mating.
nth»

w.

purponoracqmmuthmmaentnumh

with Dr. Ismail

m

most helpful as

m.

second
Our

b. has had dmidunbla experience

in psychoplvaicq. tachniquu.

SW8 ut his ham and dime.“
withhmthemdforimmudmndsforthocmmm. Iupmssodtohiu
(h

March 17th

I Visited Dr.

Ismail

thodllinbﬂityofhlvingmummeo that Dr. ﬁlmmldbo
thoDuunPoundntionorthoPnaidcntamifm Public

mppomw

‘19de

that

��mm:
Glon om, no: Ia-k
KEPITAI.

April 28, 1955

to,

Dr. Josoph S.A.Hillor,llodioal Dix-sates

M8

Dr. Kl! Pink

8i:

subJoot:
'

hospital,

Honth

Promos Ropu-t and Room-noun".

Atthsondstthofirstsixnouthsasbirootorotnosoomhatth
1 should

libs to dosoribo tho prosont stoto of our rosoaroh program,

thhnsfathoﬂuturo,anitonkowonoouasndationsforsrosm
asparagus.
I:

Prosoat

m

dotinitivo report of tho rosooroh aotivitioo of tho dspsrtnsnts of
tho hospital was prooontod to tho nsdioal Board on April It, 1955. by tho chairman
of tho Itososroh Omittoo.
A

tho prosont tins, tho staff assisting tho Dirootor inoludos two
it
psychologists and a part-tins sscrotary ( supportod by norm and

Dausn Foundation
grants); and o half-tins no toohnioian. Port-tins roooorch ootivitios aro
cox-riot! out in tho various sorvicod sports-onto. In tho Doportuont at Ioborotorios,
two toohnioians oro assisting Dr.Goldonborg, undo:- tho tons of a noon-oh
grant
of tho USPRS. Of tho psychiatric staff, two supss‘visim psyohiatrists and two
rosidonts aro ootivoly oncogod in part-tins rosoaroh. Of tho ottonding staff,
tour labors of tho Hodicol Board as in diroct collaboration with hospital
psrsonnol in spocitio projects.

is octivo in tho following projootst
a. Following on tho sumoay of tho 1951; proJoot on thorolotion of altsrod
brain mnotion to
following olootroohook thorapy, a oooond
projoot has boon undsrtoksn to asaosa tho chorootomlogioal and bioehonioal factors in impromnt.
b. An snluotion of sorposil so a thoropoutio ogont hao boon undortakon
as an intomopsrtaontal projsot, with tho sotivo oooporotion of tho
.diool dopu-tmnt, onporvisim psychiatrist and a rosidont psychiatrist.
has Dinotor

imam.

o.

dosslopuont of moan-so of abivolonoo, both as a chorootonologiosl
factor and a symptom of psychiatric choc-ponsation. “his study is in
conjunction with a lambs: of tho Hodiool Board.

d.

and taoMstoooopio
”physiological
of tho new, is now noaring oonplotian.
Dnﬁont

Tho

'l'ho

laboratory, built with funds

Tho

hm m'ass stimlata's,
nocosoary for tachis-

mt.
mublod.

oscilloooops, and roloy and lons
tosoopy havo boon dolivorsd, on?! are being
boon outlinoo and will begin by slid-Mu.

Projects hovs

�4-2Bimltonoomly with thou motto, I havo boon participant in a
nunbor of tho dopartnontol projocto at the hoopitalp oooporatod with tho ﬁbcultun Study Omittoo in tho dmlop-ont of its protocol; and havo mlnatod
throo protocola which uoro oubnittod to tho Roaoaroh Conittoo from outoido
loot-coo, and out. opooifio roommdationa on oooh.

now
mum

problou of mohiatry involvo all aopooto of tho moo, oonroo,
for thoo'pocitio tonic
tron-int and provontion of tho Nor poyohoooo.
an! innmatory poychoooo, nothing is known of tho otioloy of ochioophronia,
involutional paycheck or antic-domain illnooo. Itch duoription of tho
oouroo of thooo illnooooo io availablo, but thio haa boon of littlo bola": in
troatnont or promotion moot in ioolatod inotonooo. mutant io omit-idol;
and

W

at boot, poi-ital".

'

"

control roam for hospitalisation in loot pationto in tho dmlomontvo! owning tonsion and anxiow, and pmhotio thoughto. lutorporoonal
rolaticnohipo havo boom diotortod, culmination blurrod, and otfootivo activity
oo to throotod oolf-prooorvation. rho vat-1m porchiotric thorapioo
oo
availablo today attack difforont aopoota of thooo problouo. A prion-y goal io
tho doovoaoo in tonoion and musty, and tho ovum-o of mohotio idoation. hob
offal-t in «pound ot chaining intorporoonalxolatimohipo and oodoo of omnioation; and nontual ”education and oupport d tho pationt in dirootim his
ootivitioo along «room ohannolo that lood to
on! meiot- prooorvotim.
Tho

m1

alto

0'thMom.

“ti-toot“: intho njority or
ma‘ont nothoda
portion.- in at loaot town-11y atomim tho poyohotio
rollovine tonnion
and indnoim a roturn to non offoctivo
In this prooooo, tho following nothodo are pennant at tho hoopitoln
Ont

1.

W.
By

2.

By

3.

By

hoopitolilation,

thoe pationt
'

is ”poo-om

pm,

and ioolatod

'

tron bio

»

.diootion,

barbitnratoo, oorpooil, and chlorpronaoino,
and by olootz-oohook and ubnlatory insulin trootnonto, ton-ion and
anxioty
are roduood.
dmg

W

oo

olootroohock, olootz-onaroooio and inmlin cola thorapy pontwtio
idoation in omod by altoring brain function.

It. By group and social

aotivitioa, om group thong, in a poniooivo
onvironoont, bottor communication io footorod.

5.

individual poyohothorapy intorporoonal rolationahipo oro tootorod
alom nan-tic line.

6.

onvironnmtal “Isolation, sob ”causation, and oooial oorvioo
bolp, offootivo mnotioning is

By

By

Onrnaoaroh

prom

W.

io dovotod to ltudyingthooo

Miovnda-otamthomwmt

moo.

diooiplimo aro omtmotivoly appliod at tho hoopital,
tho offootivonooo of aw hao not boen mftioiontly some»; nor hao tho undo
While thooo

'

�W.
mwummmammm
WﬂMWbW:
mmmmmwm-mmammm
mmmmmume-‘mmm
“aluminum”. ”Wmmuth-ﬁmm
ammuqumwn-mmmmwaw
mun-nuns
1mm
”mama-um
but...“
WWmWI-wb“
name:
Amara
naom:
Wabﬁofmmmwmmmmgm
ammphmaumammmmmugm
B.

nummhummmmwmmm.
Wm”.
ntmwnmwpmmwwwormm
ammmnmotmwtmpmormm
MMvoo-R'Wﬂmtbmofmmm
Waited-mum. imam-Malawian“umumormmwwmwm.
ammmwrmmmm:
mmmmmtormm.mumonam
wmmmmmuwmmtmmm
MW. mamwmvwmmwumm
www.mwmm-meummmrm
«mwgmnkmmmmmm
Sm:
mgwmmm'm*wmw
muwumwmmmmmmmu
mammanmmmmumwm

MW”.
Was mum W but“
mmammwmwmuﬂc
mmmmwmmmumsmmam
13.

of

(Iona-up):

MmmthotmmuWW-wh
.szthbmotMW,amwwm-amnmtu
mmuwmwm
nil-M.
nmmnmormm-mmnmwmuuot

:
Aummmuammmtommmumm

Immmmmusmmmmw
coucﬂohgyuthomnc. mums-unmet» nu
mmmmwamcmauwmmormw

numb-u;

�,

m
W

WV

'7,

,7.

_

7.- ‘av‘nnwf ”WIV

,

w

0.77 ——-r.,,~__.

mm Mm

7,7 .. ,_,_.w. w.
4.-.. x» -vuJ.

v

a...

»

“.:.y.

V

um

.t‘A—f»lw"‘.. 5;?u11VI/1‘IIKV

pom). devoted $0 and: Mn. 1 mm
Wthatmchuuuﬁcolnn'muoh‘uﬁammz
manna.at the urvioo (lupus-taunts aft!» hospital; mam 1t
abuzle
hm
would
mien
«are
of
mat
mural-u of th-

men

80m,

fun-tine

«mam

fund»

2;.
50

3.

with

-

Wmum
d. Boom

1mm.

a.

m
mm:"
mm
1n Manning

5.

‘3

fur ﬂu Ina-mix Its-den

’

i

,

‘

Wam

”W
'
Why
6.
WOW
in
'

in

"

'
8.8mm
7.

9.

' 10..

~

,

3mm

Mot

'1. Director
'0

which

at! «nan-1 ”um-1.

Aux-ml

2.

«mmw

1::

7m
It

soon).

’m
-m

(1/2

a
Comm-m. azppnu
m1
Equip-ant:

up)

wannabe!

mm
6.“
8.W¢
5.“
.
5.200 . 10,000.
mono . 6.000.
3,760 - 3.300.
It,“
6'”.
.
1,300 . 1,8001
.25
.
20:33:.
12.600 o.
8,000 a 10.000.
“ 103W.
.-

2.500.

1’”.

Immune-anthem
wumrollwimmtlumw:

MWWNUSSvaUSé.
mama-Manon

10m
2. hunch bout-m . Psychiatry
by
hog-kw
5:
suppuu
W1.
mm
6. m1
u

13:.

70

335.000.
7.500.
3.200.

W

&amp;

'

hmm(mmngmn)

2%:
1,000.
o

7m.
@3600.

��,

W,

‘

.

.

7.

20

TM.

“7

»

... ,

‘ ~- ...~ ”v-

.. -r “qt-u

—

rm.wnm,——«__..a.;

v,r~w-w—;m—u~,‘.wg-W.

“my“.

m’mwz’wvu-vwww‘,..w;v-—

”Mim.
mg}

_

v.

“VF

_.

.

.‘m

,romummmrmmmmuatmmmm;
23*
and to curry an moi: indupenduut‘
ruuponuthinty
projuutu;
um
a

um
«can.
um W

to

W
W
m
meugm;w mummmm.
amt-Assum-

his

at!

umumuwwuwmamupmum
in
in
woman-y
mommy,
nun-in
thuussoeiutu
dual-1w“ psychiatry.
A.

with

lb

both

and
uhenld luvu

I: cap-rum,

By

uumu rayon-winter for that portion of the function: of
ﬂu umicu "sigma ta him by ﬂu car-octet;
in th- diruétor'u
“111

um
Whmw
«tum mtmmuu, neetingu und um touching function: u moon-Mud
than”;
by ﬂu and».
M1.
mmmeym-mmmmum.
ma~812.0mt920,m0.
.

.

WWhmhnbh.
Munoz-1um.
“Minna-dc
Tb
is
m
Wuhan-vim
m
migudtohhhytbmm.v
«nation mung "than, nun-tun «nudism units,

withukluuutmyumuupurumu.
Thu

ﬂu

uumding ofAusooiuiu

uaoniuto in ”analogy

m

for than mantionuaf ﬂu
An
at
control. of
in
we Mu ruuponuibinw.

m

dam

to

guidu

ruuponuibmw

91'

:u nupuctu of ﬂu mum at

and u
mucus-uh

mmmnumuns

n- Mussocuuinmcholmnybuohouunfmthu mun-uh
azimuth
runa-~36,ooo to 10.000.
prod-uh
uupmtuu
mung-ad
hthudupurhunu WWutthurouidummchnw Mfg uusm
hundu u smut uid 1n cranium;
such
projuctu; «Mu
ﬂu 61mm of m aunt-uh puma“; uttund comm, ms. uportu und
on Inch
pupuru, um!
madman us ﬂu mutate:-

(£th

«mm
our:
my ”train.
Mama"
mmmummumummbymmm
MﬁWWofthWWundthuDimtorofﬂuuu-oh.
3.

thumb A3313

renumtthudmmmmwutmandwryon
thuwrkofthudupumm.Mushtmti-bbumpoau1bhtomdm
such
tutu,
reports, and pnunt thou
mun
manners
madam, mu
mududmtdbyﬂubimw.usmmtobumm1udbymmag
undupu‘iumuforﬂnupudﬁud Johan—u. Mus-etc!» oniutudbythu
mmmwnthu nuimﬁmdthnmofmch.

l. Aututunt 1n Puyohiutxy: For Inch mohiutdutu who hm bud thruu
thuoppu»
ormnyuuruoIIMpuyohmmonMt
mtmmm,
for
on.
team
on: and
Ruuuurcthmypz-widuthuau~
Mt:
ormuywu
for maturation in renewal:
uluo prom the dimtor with ﬂu
mutton
uuiutuneu at pcuomul
1n
buwuunthu

ruuidunt
ma
ﬂu
Memo
Mute
Thu “shunt.
1n puyuluutry uuu uuawu mpommnty for tho auction
'

"0001‘“.

�{a

&amp;1.th

7-

W

torthovmm prom; mum chuguinb-hmvuh
and
of
tho
int—Ewan“
“as.
in
tutor.
mom
mm”
«.111
the want Wear of th- p-thnt; Tho
"spanninw
um
fa. than aspects

“W
ofﬂmbhummu‘auonumiuhmhu
Hoﬂlluﬁhumhrm,~mmmuueh
mmwwmam.
mmttmummutwwm kmlnhmchm,hmm¢h
mm'mummmdmnmmwmmuMufmhapimummduuw-ﬂ'
aux-y nap-nuns
nap
mm. W.
’

neopo,

'

'

06.000 to 10,000.

on

twmpuyeholoyuﬂanm

mammal.
mmwamm,mummmpommwrortu
nothoda and
smut-hum at thbut

Newt.

smart.

duign

'

with tho soul- of thy

.

‘

'thryrumn-Sﬁﬁoommhwo

«Wotan.
”mam
Mat-311W
W,
build
can.
mmuw
“Wham
cm;
with tho parallel-exist inc
m maul-d) mat:
MW
”Wham
cup-rd..in
ohmic“
magnum"
mum
m.
b. mum: a); 1ft!» hbontcry u asp-aloe to
m.
manna-n
whatnot-chain studio’s. Wlmmmmtdﬂummool
con-urn.
Salary
to 30,900.
mg.
Mtg
",3‘

an

an

-, o

:7

.

sup-n13.
abducts-Inna;
Ia and: null-1 than“
1‘0

and

Wm
a-

85,200

W
1mm
wWad
cum
W
We
m,
um
”hum
1M
www.mmupmdmwmmw
mum
mm:
rem
um
mm
mm
Wwamn‘tarofthu “hm; wtocmmmumumhmungmmm
unioapnjocum toba-Iunhyﬂu ”Mummhmm; alum
d. And-mt

- Social

WI

3.5. (Seaman-k) with
yum
work.
on
use-sing funny nhtiennhipu. Pinon-1 ambit:
11' pmiou mun-ch «pox-hm. with
or
mum-nu
it should be Muﬂy might-d.
Aid-tut. u to
napouihdhty for
on binary tad
to obtain
{tantalum
ad
to the only you. of durum] to
with tho

mm

of

f1”

1-

in amusing

mum,
m1
new
mammal
Ihichhcwmoorgwuththnpm «mammal-am

follow up contact. undo. For :11 fellow-up touting an!
thc
1:111 like tin mos-cry contact- tad arrangunufor Hindu-actor.
“0mm
Tho
wot-hr
to th- aws-Itch amo- I111. 11‘ t1.- 13 mm]...
cooperate with the Dix-actor 3350:3111 8mm. in ﬂint
prawn
5%

WtuWNIIMMWtMDMrMMIWO.
aim-Monongooor

WmomMmuwW-innm

�hme-mlmm,aw0uommmwm
anuslupus. alum; m “not. In. "can!”mum «a! £11m;
“parts
WM
mmmegaMnmmp—m.
”00
I;thMtum-mhmmutbm.
‘9
”‘mo
“’m‘
1
.“
”m
m1.
PM
W,
2.
Gallop M00, WW1.
m.mehw.
huststthubmmm”
uthmmmnngarmm
mamwmmusimmmm.mmmmwnm
«.memgmummmmmormgwmua
mmmpamgmw,mnmmm1mm.
mrmdwmmmmmuémm.

ﬁmmmﬁmgmmmw
81

1''

m.ummumniymowu‘mumma
bmmamtimingfumtimmdukolomm

mum-norm.
plmning haiblo, it is mud-d 0h“

W
stummmormmmmmuwaecmmm
of
. nun-buds»
of 060,000 870,000; and with

.

3

luau-uh

1955-56

by

Ommhﬂl] ﬂat

836.100.

mmnwwmmmbmm-uﬂ,
lab-1M.
Wily

We!”
lam,

3.0.

I955.

�HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Glen Oaks,

New

York

April 28, 1955
Tb:

Dr. Joseph S.A. Miller, Medical Director

From:

Dr.

Max

Fink

Six Month Progress Report and Recommendations.

Subject:

At the end of the

first six

months as Director of Research

at the

hospital, I should like to describe the present state of our research program,
our plans for the future, and to make specific recommendations for a research

department.

I: Present
'A

Proggam

definitive report of the research activities of the departments of

the hospital was presented to the Medical Board on April h, 1955, by the chairman
of the Research Committee.
At the present time, the staff assisting the Director includes two
psychologists and a part-time secretary (supported by USPHS and Dazian Foundation
grants); and a half~time EEG technician. Part-time research activities are
carried out in the various service departments. In the Department of Laboratories,
two technicians are assisting Dr. Goldenberg, under the terms of a research grant
of the USPHS. Of the psychiatric staff, two supervising psychiatrists and two
residents are actively engaged in part-time research. Of the attending staff,
four members of the medical Board are in direct collaboration with hospital

personnel in Specific projects.
The

Director is active in the following projects:

a. Following on the summary of the l95h project on the relation of altered
brain function to improvement following electroshock therapy, a second
project has been undertaken to assess the characterological and biochemical factors in improvement.

evaluation of serpasil as a therapeutic agent has been undertaken
as an interdepartmental project, with the active cooperation of the
medical department, supervising psychiatrist and a resident psychiatrist.

b.

An

c.

development of measures of ambivalence, both as a characterological
factor and a symptom of psychiatric decompensation. This study is in
conjunction with a member of the Medical Board.

d.

neurophysiological and-tachistoscopic laboratory, built with funds
of the USPHS, is now nearing completion. The two Grass stimulators,
DuMont oscilloscope, and relay and lens systems necessary for tachistoscopy have been delivered, and are being assembled. Projects have
been outlined and will begin by mid-May.

The

The

v'

/

�-2...
Simultaneously with these efforts, I have been a participant in a
number of the departmental projects at the hospital; cooperated with the Subculture Study Committee in the development of its protocol; and have evaluated
three protocols which were submitted to the Research Committee from outside
sources, and made specific recommendations on each.

II.

Future Programs

Present problems of psychiatry involve all aspects of the cause, course,
treatment and prevention of the major psychoses. Except for the specific toxic
and inflammatory psychoses, nothing is known of the etiology of schizophrenia,
involutional psychosis or manic-depressive illness. Much description of the
course of these illnesses is available, but this has been of little help in
treatment or prevention except in isolated instances. Treatment is empirical,
and

at best, primitive.

central reason for hospitalization in most patients is the devel~
opment of overwhelming tension and anxiety, and psychotic thoughts. Interpersonal
relationships have become distorted, communication blurred, and effective activity
so minimal as to threaten self-preservation. The various psychiatric therapies
available today attack different aspects of these problems. A primary goal is
the decrease in tension and anxiety, and the erasure of psychotic ideation. Much
effort is expended at clarifying interpersonal relationships and modes of communication; and eventual reeducation and support of the patient in directing his
activities along effective channels that lead to self- and social- preservation.
The

present methods are apparently satisfactory in the majority of
patients in at least temporarily stemming the psychotic process, relieving tension
and inducing a return to more effective functioning. In this process, the following methods are prominent at the hospital:
Our

1.

By

hospitalization, the patient is separated

environment.

and

isolated from his

2. By drug medication, as barbiturates, serpasil, and chlorpromaline,
and by electroshock and ambulatory insulin treatments, tension and
anxiety symptoms are reduced.
3. By electroshock, electronarcosis and insulin coma therapy psychotic
ideation is erased by altering brain function.

b.

By group and

5.

By

social activities,

environment, better

and group therapy
communication is fostered.

in a permissive

individual psychotherapy interpersonal relationships are fostered

along

realistic lines.

6. By environmental manipulation, job reeducation, and

help, effective functioning is strengthened.
Our

social service

research program is devoted to studying these processes.

A. To Understand

the'ﬂay Therapy'Horks:

disciplines are constructively applied at the hospital,
the effectiveness of any has not been sufficiently assessed, nor has the mode
While these

�.3mode
of
of
the
lhe
study
evaluated.r
present
been
adequately
of operation
has
Electroshock
of
our
interest.
example
an
electroshock
of
is
operation
By
assessing
in
many
from
patients.
depression
psychotic
resulted in improvement

be
works
will
electroshock
the various possibilities it
understood. If this is accomplished, then some ideas about the mental and
The understanding of
become
clear.
may
in
depression
physiological processes
A plan for a
of
service.
research
the
electroshock treatment is the first goal
similar study of insulin coma therapy is now in preparation; and others at the
environment
as a therapeutic
of
the
hospital
a
study
planning
hospital are

is

hoped

that the

way

mechanism.
B.

Relationship of Character Structure to Diagnosis:

child—
of
the
the
demonstrate
importance
to
devoted
been
study has
hood environment in the development of character, behaviour patterns under stress
conditions and the neuroses. Other investigators are actively involved in assess—
of
adult
in
the
variety
result
that
childhood
relationships
the
in
the
factors
ing
behaviour patterns. It is not possible to carry out such studies at Hillside,
but the important relationship between character and the type of mental illness
of
behavioural
to
of
the
character
patterns
the
relation
the patient shows;
change which we call 'improvement'; and the aspects of character that resist
treatment methods can be assessed. A prototype of such studies is now in progresselectroshock
in
therapy.
improvement
to
basic
of
character
the
in
aspects
much

C.

Biochemical and Physiological Factors in Mental

Illness:

ill

for long periods, appear to take on a stereoPersons who have been
and
chemistry
in
their
reflected
which
is ultimately
typed behaviour pattern,
by
neurologic,
'non—reactor'
and
patterns
such
of
'reactor'
Study
physiology.
the
failures
in
assessing
methods
important
and
are
drug
biochemical
physiologic,
and
physical
illness
between
psychiatric
the
relations
of present therapies;
Such
and
a
improvement.
between
therapies
'organic'
and
the relation
illness;
to
drugs
EST
and
reaction
where
second
project,
the
in
incorporated
study is
and
of
long
short
terms
in
be
assessed
will
electroencephalogram
changes in the
term improvement rates.
(Follow—up):
Results
Treatment
of
D. Continuing Evaluations
suffer
treatment
of
generally
of
present
the
results
studies
Follow-up
of
the
evaluation
done
an
without
are
only;
one
therapy
because they assess
control
to
standard
and
compared
not
are
improvement;
for
subject‘s potentialities
followcontinuing
a
be
to
organize
possible
With
may
active support, it
groups.
evaluated
on
admission;
assessed
are
the
in
hospital
which
patients
up program, in
followed
a
and
over
then
methods
at
discharge;
and
psychiatric
by psychologic
number of years with an evaluation as to sustained change and reasons for failure.
much
would
have
at
discharge,
the
to
predictions
Such an evaluation, if compared
base—line
for
and
a
provide
of
choice
therapies,
present
merit in assessing the
the evaluation of any future therapeutic methods.

III.

Recommendation

of
problems
the
methods
in
attacking
of
suggested
In this outline
the
treatment
best;
as
one
made
to
specific
specify
no
effort
have
I
psychiatry,
is
that
fragmentary
so
it
knowledge
is
Present
the
specific.
or one etiology as
of
psychoses.
the
major
to
the
eticlogy
make
as
only
a
to
poor guess
possible
A multidisciplinary approach with full freedom to follow many leads is the best
of
a
establishment
recommend
the
would
For
I
be
this
offered.
reason,
that can

�-

u

-

Research Service, with full-time personnel devoted to such studies. I would
suggest that such a service have "research" as its function; that it be independent of the service departments of the hospital; and that it have a basic
budget which would assure continuation regardless of the availability of outside
research funds.
A.

The

Research Service should have the following organization:

1. Director of Research -- Responsible to the Medical Director.
2. Research Associates in Psychiatry and Psychology.
3. Research Assistants:

a.
b.
c.
d.

Psychology
Neurophysiology

Psychiatry
Social Service

h. Secretarial and clinical personnel.
5. Technicians.
B.

Annual Budget recommendations

for the Research Service:

1. Director
2. Associate in Psychiatry
"
in Psychology
b. Assistant in Psychiatry
"
5.
in Psychology
“
6.
in Neurophysiology
"
7.
in Social Service

8. Secretary
9. Technician
n
10.

-

Lab
EEG

(1/2 time)

$20,000
12,000
8,000
6,000
5,200
5,200
h,000
2,760
h,000
1,300

Equipment: As warranted
Consumable Supplies

Travel

Overhead:

As

decided by Administrator.

- $25,000.
- 20,000.
- 10,000.
- 10,000.
—

-

-

8,h00.
10,000.
6,000.
3,300.
6,000.
1,800.
2,h00.
1,000.

available as a continuing commitment to
the Medical Director for long range planning of the Research Service.
These funds should be made

For the budget year 1955-1956. I should like to make the specific
recommendation that the following are the minimum requirements:

1.
2.
3.
h.
5.

Director

Research Assistant
"

"

Secretary

Consumable Supplies

6. Travel
7. Overhead
8.

EEG

- Psychiatry

- Psychology
&amp;

Equipment

Technician (in Operating budget)

$15,000.
7,500.
7,200.
3,000.
2,h00.
1,0000

-

$36,100.
1,600.
$37,700.

�0. Space:
Problems of space at the hospital are acute, and will provide an increasing measure of difficulty as the service is developed. It is suggested
that in the next capital outlay by the hospital for construction, some allowances
be made.
for the Research Service
‘

D.

Relation with Other Departments:

activities of the Research Service are to be those designated by
the Director. Interdepartmental projects will be carried out by the Research
Service, or in those instances where approval of the Research Committee is obtained, by the departments involved. Supervision of such interdepartmental
projects will lie with the Research Director.
The

Interdepartmental projects are to be fostered by the Director. Prior
approval by the Research Committee and the Medical Director is required. Such
projects as are consistent with the service functions of the departments involved
W111 be fostered. Presentations and reports are to be approved by the Research
Committee prior to publication.
E.

Job Description:

1. Director of Research:

objectives of the Director of Research will be to: (l) Organize
and maintain an active program of research and a Research Service; (2) Promote,
supervise and integrate research activities at the Hospital; (3) Educate hospital
personnel in research methods and progress; and (h) Administer research funds.
The

The

director of research will:

a. Organize a central project or series of projects appropriate to the
unique character of the Hospital and integrate this into the activities
(therapeutic) of the Hospital. Progress reports will be submitted to the Medical
Director and to each meeting of the Research Committee of the Medical Board; and
such data as is approved for presentation will be submitted by the Director or
his delegate at the appropriate scientific society.

all

staff to plan and carry out individual
research projects. Third year residents in psychiatry are to be specifically
encouraged to undertake research projects under his direct supervision, or that
of an attending psychiatrist. For these residents, and any other professional
members of the staff, the director of research is to assist in the planning of
b. Encourage

members

of the

the project; in its integration into the hospital program; and in
both technically and financially.

its

support

0. Carry on such educational activities as the supervision of third year
residents in research; monthly seminars in research problems and progress; and
periodical reports of important psychiatric meetings. The director will maintain
a calendar of meetings and lectures; stimulate attendance thereto; and foster the
He
such
of
is also to invite such
meetings.
at
Hospital
activities
presentation
guest lecturers and seminar leaders as are available.

d. Administer all research funds with the approval of the Medical Director.
This includes the stimulation of fund sources; the application for funds; and their

allocation to hospital projects.

�2. Research Associate:

Director in all projects at the hospital; to
assume responsibility for specified projects; and to carry on such independent
investigations as his training and experience dictate.
Tb

work with the

Associate in Psychiatry is to be a qualified diplomats in
psychiatry, with extensive experience both in psychoanalytic psychiatry and in
descriptive psychiatry. By training or experience, the associate should have
teaching qualifications; and some training in research methods.
A. Such an

assume responsibility for that portion of the functions of
the service assigned to him by the director; assume responsibility in the director's
absence; attend conferences, meetings and assume teaching functions as recommended
by the director.
He

range

—

will

Salary to be determined by qualification and experience. Probable
$12,000 to 20,000.

B. Such an Associate in Psychology is to be a qualified psychologist
with at least 10 years experience. Psychoanalytic experience is preferable.
The equivalent in academic standing of Associate Professor is the guide line.

research associate in psychology is to assume responsibility
for those functions of the Research Service assigned to him by the director.
An evaluation of testing methods. statistical evaluation of results. and a
of
the research
of
of
aspects
contr0l
the.functioning
procedure
in
all
rigorous
service are his responsibility.
The research associate in psychology may be chosen from the research
assistants. Salary range - $8,000 to 10,000.
The

will: organize and supervise projects
in the department; supervise projects of the resident psychiatric staff; assist
such department heads as request aid in organizing departmental projects; advise
the director of new research possibilities; attend conferences, write reports and
papers, and carry on such administrative activities as the Director may require.
Both Research Associates

Board

at

Appointments to Research Associate are to be made by the Medical
the recommendation of the Medical Director and the Director of Research.

3. Research Assistants:

assist the director in his research activities and carry on
the work of the department. Each assistant is to be responsible to the director,
and will carry on such tests, procedures, write such reports, and present those
To

papers designated by the Director. Assistants are to be qualified by training
and experience for the specified jobs named. They are to be appointed by the
Medical Director at the nomination of the Director of Research.

a. Assistant in Psychiatry: For such psychiatristswho have had three
or more years of formal psychiatric training but not yet certified, the opportunity to work for one or more years on a Research Service may provide the
stimulation for continuation in research and also provide the director with the
assistance of personnel intermediate in experience between the resident and the
associate. The assistant in psychiatry can assume responsibility for the selection

�-7of the patients for the various projects; evaluate changes in behaviour with
treatment; assess the importance of intrapsychic and environmental factors in
the present behaviour of the patient. the assistant.vill assume responsibility
for those aspects of the problems under investigation as are within his scope,
and assigned by the director. He will write such reports, papers and make such
presentations as the director may suggest. He will make such tests, learn such
technics and work with those members of the research service or the service departments of the hospital as his projects permit.
Salary is dependent on experience. Probable range $6,000 to 1C,000.
b. Assistant in Psychology: Graduate in psychology with a minimum
of doctorate. Preferable experience in research methods and publication experience
with some specialization in laboratory methods. Equivalent academic status of
assistant professor. The assistant in psychology is to carry on such psychologic
and laboratory tests, and make such statistical and methodological evaluations
as the projects of the service require; and to make such reports and presentations
as the director may suggest. He is to direct the laboratory technicians, organize
their work and assume responsibility for the maintenance of all testing equipment
and materials. In the design of projects, he is to assume responsibility for the
application of the best methods and design commensurate with the goals of the

project.

Salary range

~

$5,200 to 8,h00.

c. Assistant in Neurophysiology: M.D. or Ph.D., with a minimum of
three years experience in electroencephalography or neurophysiology. To supervise
and coordinate all neurophysiological studies, now being organized; develop and
build electrophysiological equipment; assume responsibility fer such animal studies
as are organized; cooperate with the psychologist in coordinated neuropsychological
investigations; and supervise technicians in electrical methods.
This position can be filled only if the laboratory is expanded to
include more basic studies. Personnel can then be recruited from medical school
training centers. Salary range - $5,200 to 10,000.

d. Assistant ~ Social Service: B.S. (Soc. Work) with minimum of five
years experience in field or administrative work. Emphasis on interviewing
technics and assessing family relationships. Personal analysis recommended.
If previous research experience with psychiatrists or psychiatric clinics is
noted, it should be heavily weighted.

Assistant is to assume responsibility for interviewing relatives
of patients and develop technics of assessing premorbid characteristics based
on history and interview; to obtain histories from relatives and patient relevant
to the early years of development; to cooperate with the psychologist in assessing
the personality of the subjects; and to coordinate research testing in the various
projects. Patients seen during their hospitalization in any of the research
service projects are to be seen by the social worker prior to discharge, and eVery
effort at follow up contact made. For all follOWbup testing and evaluation, the
assistant will make the necessary contacts and arrangements for the director.
The social worker assigned to the research service will, if time is available,
cooperate with the Director of Social Service in those interdepartmental projects
which he may have organized with the approval of the director of research.
Assistant is to be selected by the Director of Social Service.
Salary range proportionate to experience in research. Range - $h,000 to 6,000.

�e. Technicians:
EEG -~ High
l.
fundamentals

school graduate, although two years college preferred.
To learn the
of electroencephalography; make the necessary measurements and place electrodes; obtain artefact free records; maintain card files;
type reports; keep records in systematic way; and maintain equipment. Technician
is to be responsible to the assistant in neurophysiology or the director.

Salary

-- if

untrained,

$52,600;

if trained,

$33,060

to 353,600.

2. Lab. Technicianp-Neurophysiology. College graduate, preferably
with some engineering or physics experience. To assist the assistant in neurophysiology and/or the assistant in psychology, in the development and maintenance
of electrical equipment; to assist in the handling of animals; to cooperate in
the experimental procedures; to build, adjust and design special equipment.

Salary range dependent on training-- Rangeﬁ .000 to 6,000.
IV.

Summary:

Research Director is actively involved in a number of studies of
the mechanism of treatment. To maintain a continuing function and make long term
planning feasible, it is recommended that a Research Service be established; that
be an integral part of hospital organization with a continuing annual budget.
it
A proposed organization is included in this report, with a projected annual budget
of $60,000 ~ $70,000; and with a minimum budget 1955-56 of $36,100.
The

This report approved by the Research Committee April 27, 1955.

Respectfully submitted,
Max

Fink,

MoDo

Director of Research

�HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Glen Oaks,

New

York

April 28, 1955
Th:

Dr. Joseph S.A. Miller, Medical Director

From:

Dr.

Max

subject: Six

Fink

Month

Progress Report and Recommendations.

first

six months as Director of Research at the
hospital, I should like to describe the present state of our research program,
our plans for the future, and to make specific recommendations for a research
At the end of the

department.

I: Present
A

Program

definitive report of the research activities of the departments of

the hospital was presented to the Medical Board on April 5, 1955, by the chairman
of the Research Committee.
At the present time, the staff assisting the Director includes two
psychologists and a part-time secretary (supported by USPHS and Dazian Foundation
grants); and a half-time EEG technician. Part-time research activities are

carried out in the various service departments. In the Department of Laboratories,
two technicians are assisting Dr. Goldenberg, under the terms of a research grant
of the USPHS. Of the psychiatric staff, two supervising psychiatrists and two
residents are actively engaged in part—time research. Of the attending staff,
four members of the l"ledical Board are in direct collaboration with hospital
personnel in specific projects.
The

Director is active in the following projects:

a. Following on the summary of the l9Sh project on the relation of altered
brain function to improvement following electroshock therapy, a second
project has been undertaken to assess the characterological and biochemical factors in improvement.

b.

evaluation of serpasil as a therapeutic agent has been undertaken
as an interdepartmental project, with the active cooperation of the
medical department, supervising psychiatrist and a resident psychiatrist.

c.

development of measures of ambivalence, both as a characterological
factor and a symptom of psychiatric decompensation. This study is in
Dmedical
member
of
the
with
Board.
a
conjunction

d.

neurophysiological and tachistoscopic laboratory, built with funds
of the USPHS, is now nearing completion. The two Grass stimulators,
DuMont oscilloscope, and relay and lens systems necessary for tachistoscopy have been delivered, and are being assembled. Projects have
been outlined and will begin by mid-May.

An

The

The

�-2...
Simultaneously with these efforts, I have been a participant in a
number of the departmental projects at the hospital; cooperated with the Subculture Study Committee in the development of its protocol; and have evaluated
three protocols which were submitted to the Research Committee from outside
sources, and made specific recommendations on each.

II.

Future Programs

Present problems of psychiatry involve all aspects of the cause, course,
treatment and prevention of the major psychoses. Except for the specific toxic
and inflammatory psychoses, nothing is known of the etiology of schizophrenia,
involutional psychosis or manic-depressive illness. Much description of the
course of these illnesses is available, but this has been of little help in
treatment or prevention except in isolated instances. Treatment is empirical,
and at best, primitive.
The

central reason for hospitalization in most patients is the devel-

opment of overwhelming tension and anxiety, and psychotic thoughts. Interpersonal
relationships have become distorted, communication blurred, and effective activity
so minimal as to threaten self-preservation. The various psychiatric therapies

available today attack different aspects of these problems. A primary goal is
the decrease in tension and anxiety, and the erasure of psychotic ideation. Much
effort is expended at clarifying interpersonal relationships and modes of commun—
ication; and eventual reeducation and support of the patient in directing his
activities along effective channels that lead to self- and social- preservation.

present methods are apparently satisfactory in the majority of
patients in at least temporarily stemming the psychotic process, relieving tension
and inducing a return to more effective functioning. In this process, the following methods are prominent at the hospital:
Our

1.

By

hOSpitalization, the patient is separated and isolated from his

environment.

2. By drug medication, as barbiturates, serpasil, and chlorpromaaine,
and by electroshock and ambulatory insulin treatments, tension and
anxiety symptoms are reduced.
'

3. By electroshock, electronarcosis and insulin coma therapy psychotic
ideation is erased by altering brain function.
'

b. By group and social activities, and group therapy in a permissive
environment, better communication is fostered.
5.

By

individual psychotherapy interpersonal relationships are fostered

along

realistic lines.

6. By environmental manipulation, job reeducation, and social service

help, effective functioning is strengthened.
Our

A. To

research program is devoted to studying these processes.

Understand the Hay Therapy Vorks:

disciplines are constructively applied at the hospital,
the effectiveness of any has not been sufficiently assessed; nor has the mode
While these

�.3mode
of
of
The
the
study
evaluated.
present
been
adequately
of operation
has
Electroshock
of
interest.
our
example
an
electroshock
of
is
operation

By
assessing
in
many
from
patients.
depression
psychotic
improvement
resulted in
be
works
will
electroshock
the
way
that
hoped
is
the various possibilities
and
mental
about
the
ideas
some
then
accomplished,
understood. If this is

it

The
of
become
understanding
clear.
may
in
depression
physiological processes
A plan for a
of
service.
the
research
electroshock treatment is the first goal
similar study of insulin coma therapy is now in preparation; and others at the
environment
as a therapeutic
of
the
hospital
study
a
planning
hospital are

mechanism.
B.

Relationship of Character Structure to Diagnosis:

study has been devoted to demonstrate the importance of the childhood environment in the development of character, behaviour patterns under stress
involved
in
assessOther
actively
are
and
investigators
the
neuroses.
conditions
of
adult
the
in
variety
result
that
childhood
relationships
the
in
factors
the
ing
behaviour patterns. It is not pOSSible to carry out such studies at Hillside,
mental
of
illness
and
the
between
type
character
the
but
important relationship
of
behavioural
to
of
the
patterns
character
the
relation
shows;
the patient
of
character that resist
and
the
aspects
'improvement‘;
we
which
call
change
A
be
prototype of such studies is now in progressmethods
assessed.
can
treatment
electroshock
therapy.
in
improvement
to
basic
of
character
the
in
aspects
Much

C.

Biochemical and Physiological Factors in Mental

Illness:

ill

for long periods, appear to take on a stereoPersons who have been
and
chemistry
in
their
reflected
which
is ultimately
typed behaviour pattern,
by
'non—reactor‘
neurologic,
and
patterns
of
such
'reactor'
Study
physiology.
the
failures
in
assessing
methods
important
and
are
drug
biochemical
physiologic,
and
physical
illness
between
psychiatric
the
relations
of present therapies;
Such
a
and
improvement.
between
therapies
'organic'
and
the relation
illness;
and
to
drugs
EST
reaction
where
second
project,
study is incorporated in the
and
of
long
short
terms
in
be
assessed
will
electroencephalogram
the
changes in
term improvement rates.
D. Continuing Evaluations of Treatment Results (Follow~up):
suffer
treatment
generally
of
of
present
the
results
studies
Follow-up
of
the
evaluation
done
an
without
because they assess one therapy only; are
control
standard
to
compared
and
not
are
improvement;
subject's potentialities for
followa
continuing
be
to
organize
possible
may
With
active support, it
groups.
evaluated
on
admission;
assessed
the
are
in
which
hospital
patients
up program, in
followed
a
and
over
then
methods
at
discharge;
and
psychiatric
by psychologic
number of years with an evaluation as to sustained change and reasons for failure.
much
would
have
at
discharge,
Such an evaluation, if compared to the predictions
for
base-line
and
a
provide
of
therapies,
choice
present
merit in assessing the
the evaluation of any future therapeutic methods.

III.

Recommendation

of
problems
the
methods
in
attacking
of
suggested
In this outline
the
treatment
best;
as
one
made
to
specific
specify
no
effort
have
I
psychiatry,
is
that
fragmentary
so
it
knowledge
is
Present
the
specific.
or one etiology as
of
the
psychoses.
major
to
the
etiology
make
as
only
a
to
guess
poor
possible
A multidisciplinary approach with full freedom to follow many leads is the best
of
a
establishment
recommend
the
would
For
I
this reason,
that can be offered.

�-

h

-

Research Service, with full-time personnel devoted to such studies. I would
be indesuggest that such a service have "research" as its function; that
have a basic
pendent of the service departments of the hospital; and that
budget which would assure continuation regardless of the availability of outside

it

it

research funds.
A.

The

Research Service should have the following organization:

1. Director of Research -- Responsible to the Medical Director.
2. Research Associates in Psychiatry and Psychology.
3. Research Assistants:

a. Psychology

b. Neurophysiology
c. Psychiatry
d. Social Service

h. Secretarial and clinical personnel.
5. Technicians.
B.

Annual Budget recommendations

for the Research Service:

1. Director
2. Associate in Psychiatry
"
3.
in Psychology
b. Assistant in Psychiatry
"
5.
in Psychology
"
6.
in Neurophysiology
"
7.
in Social Service
8. Secretary

9. Technician
"
10.

—

Lab
EEG

$20,000 - $25,000.
12,000 - 20,000.
8,000 - 10,000.
6,000 - 10,000.
5,200 - 8,h00.
5,200 - 10,000.
h,000 - 6,000.
2,760 - 3,300.
h,000 - 6,000.
1,300 - 1,800.

(1/2 time)

warranted
Consumable Supplies
Travel
Overhead: As decided by Administrator.

Equipment:

As

2,h00.
1,000.

available as a continuing commitment to
the Medical Director for long range planning of the Research Service.
For the budget year 1955-1956. I should like to make the specific
These funds should be made

recommendation

1.
2.
3.
h.
5.
6.

that the following are the

Director

Research Assistant
"

"

Secretary

Consumable Supplies

Travel

minimum

- Psychiatry

Psychology

~

&amp;

Equipment

7. Overhead
8.

EEG

Technician (in Operating budget)

requirements:

$15,000.
7,500.
7,200.
3,000.
2,h00.
1,000.

-

$36,100.
1,600.
$37,700.

�C.

Space:

Problems of space at the hospital are acute, and will provide an increasing measure of difficulty as the service is developed. It is suggested
that in the next capital outlay by the hospital for construction, some allowances
be made.
for the Research Service
'

D.

Relation with Other Departments:

activities of the Research Service are to be those designated by
the Director. Interdepartmental projects will be carried out by the Research
Service, or in those instances where approval of the Research Committee is obtained, by the departments involved. Supervision of such interdepartmental
projects will lie with the Research Director.
The

Interdepartmental projects are to be fostered by the Director. Prior
approval by the Research Committee and the Medical Director is required. Such
projects as are consistent with the service functions of the departments involved
will be fostered. Presentations and reports are to be approved by the Research
Committee prior to publication.
E.

Job Description:

1. Director of Research:

objectives of the Director of Research will be to: (l) Organize
and maintain an active program of research and a Research Service; (2) Promote,
supervise and integrate research activities at the Hospital; (3) Educate hospital
personnel in research methods and progress; and (h) Administer research funds.
The

The

director of research will:

a. Organize a central project or series of projects appropriate to the
unique character of the Hospital and integrate this into the activities
(therapeutic) of the Hospital. Progress reports will be submitted to the Medical
Director and to each meeting of the Research Committee of the Medical Board; and
such data as is approved for presentation will be submitted by the Director or
his delegate at the appropriate scientific society.

staff to plan and carry out individual
research projects. Third year residents in psychiatry are to be specifically
encouraged to undertake research projects under his direct supervision, or that
of an attending psychiatrist. For these residents, and any other professional
members of the staff, the director of research is to assist in the planning of
b. Encourage

all

members

of the

the project; in its integration into the hospital program; and in
both technically and financially.

its

support

c. Carry on such educational activities as the supervision of third year
residents in research; monthly seminars in research problems and progress; and
The
director will maintain
of
meetings.
important
psychiatric
periodical reports
a calendar of meetings and lectures; stimulate attendance thereto; and foster the
He
such
of
is also to invite such
meetings.
at
Hospital
activities
presentation
guest lecturers and seminar leaders as are available.
d. Administer all research funds with the approval of the Medical Director.
This includes the stimulation of fund sources; the application for funds; and their
allocation to hospital projects.

�2. Research Associate:

Director in all projects at the hospital; to
assume responsibility for specified projects; and to carry on such independent
investigations as his training and experience dictate.
Tb

work with the

Associate in Psychiatry is to be a qualified diplomats in
psychiatry, with extensive experience both in psychoanalytic psychiatry and in
descriptive psychiatry. By training or experience, the associate should have
teaching qualifications; and some training in research methods.
A. Such an

assume responsibility for that portion of the functions of
the service assigned to him by the director; assume responsibility in the director‘s
absence; attend conferences, meetings and assume teaching functions as recommended
by the director.

will

He

Salary to be determined by qualification and experience. Probable
range - $12,000 to 20,000.
‘

B. Such an Associate in Psychology is to be a qualified psychologist
with at least 10 years experience. Psychoanalytic experience is preferable.
The equivalent in academic standing of Associate Professor is the guide line.

research associate in psychology is to assume responsibility
for those functions of the Research Service assigned to him by the director.
An evaluation of testing methods, statistical evaluation of results. and a
rigorous control of procedure in all aspects of the functioning of the research
service are his responsibility.
The research associate in psychology may be chosen from the research
assistants. Salary range - b8,000 to 10,000.
The

will: organize and supervise projects
in the department; supervise projects of the resident psychiatric staff; assist
such department heads as request aid in organizing departmental projects; advise
the director of new research possibilities; attend conferences, write reports and
papers, and carry on such administrative activities as the Director may require.
Both Research Associates

Board

at

Appointments to Research Associate are to be made by the Medical
the recommendation of the Medical Director and the Director of Research.

3. Research Assistants:

assist the director in his research activities and carry on
the work of the department. Each assistant is to be responsible to the director,
and will carry on such tests, procedures, write such reports, and present those
To

papers designated by the Director. Assistants are to be qualified by training
and experience for the specified jobs named. They are to be appointed by the
Medical Director at the nomination of the Director of Research.

a. Assistant in Psychiatry: For such psychiatristswho have had three
or more years of formal psychiatric training but not yet certified, the opportunity to work for one or more years on a Research Service may provide the
stimulation for continuation in research and also provide the director with the
assistance of personnel intermediate in experience between the resident and the
associate. The assistant in psychiatry can assume responsibility for the selection

�-7of the patients for the various projects; evaluate changes in behaviour with
treatment; assess the importance of intrapsychic and environmental factors in
the present behaviour of the patient. the assistant will assume responsibility
for those aspects of the problems under investigation as are within his scope,
and assigned by the director. He will write such reports, papers and make such
presentations as the director may suggest. He will make such tests, learn such
technics and work with those members of the research service or the service departments of the hospital as his projects permit.

Salary is dependent on experience. Probable range $6,000 to 10,000.

b. Assistant in Psychology: Graduate in psychology with a minimum
of doctorate. Preferable experience in research methods and publication experience
with some specialization in laboratory methods. Equivalent academic status of
assistant professor. The assistant in psychology is to carry on such psychologic
and laboratory tests, and make such statistical and methodological evaluations
as the projects of the service require; and to make such reports and presentations
as the director may suggest. He is to direct the laboratory technicians, organize
their work and assume responsibility for the maintenance of all testing equipment
and materials. In the design of projects, he is to assume responsibility for the
application of the best methods and design commensurate with the goals of the

project.

Salary range - $5,200 to

8,hOO.

minimum
M.D.
of
with
a
Ph.D.,
or
Assistant
in
Neurophvsiology:
c.
three years experience in electroencephalography or neurophysiology. To supervise
and coordinate all neurophysiological studies, now being organized; develop and
build electrophysiological equipment; assume responsibility for such animal studies
as are organized; cooperate with the psychologist in coordinated neuropsychological
investigations; and supervise technicians in electrical methods.

This position can be filled only if the laboratory is expanded to
include more basic studies. Personnel can then be recruited from medical school
training centers. Salary range - $5,200 to 10,000.

d. Assistant - Social Service: B.S. (Soc. Work) with minimum of five
years experience in field or administrative work. Emphasis on interviewing
technics and assessing family relationships. Personal analysis recommended.
If previous research experience with psychiatrists or psychiatric clinics is
noted, it should be heavily weighted.

Assistant is to assume reaponsibility for interviewing relatives
of patients and develop technics of assessing premorbid characteristics based
on history and interview; to obtain histories from relatives and patient relevant
to the early years of development; to cooparate with the psychologist in assessing
the personality of the subjects; and to coordinate research testing in the various
projects, Patients seen during their hospitalization in any of the research
service projects are to be seen by the social worker prior to discharge, and every
effort at follow up contact made. For all followbup testing and evaluation, the
assistant will make the necessary contacts and arrangements for the director.
The social worker assigned to the research service will, if time is available,
cooperate with the Director of Social Service in those interdepartmental projects
which he may have organized with the approval of the director of research.
Assistant is to be selected by the Director of Social Service.
Salary range proportionate to experience in research. Range - th,000 to 6,000.

�e. Technicians:

l.

EEG

--

High school graduate, although two years college

preferred.

learn the fundamentals of electroencephalography; make the necessary measure—
ments and place electrodes; obtain artefact free records; maintain card files;
type reports; keep records in systematic way; and maintain equipment. Technician
is to be responsible to the assistant in neurophysiology or the director.
To

Salary --

if

untrained, $2,600;

if trained,

$3,000 to $3,600.

2. Lab. Technician--Neurophysiology. College graduate, preferably
with some engineering or physics experience. To assist the assistant in neurophysiology and/or the assistant in psychology, in the development and maintenance
of electrical equipment; to assist in the handling of animals; to cooperate in
the experimental procedures; to build, adjust and design special equipment.

Salary range dependent on training-~ Range$h,000 to 6,000.
IV.

Summary:

Research Director is actively involved in a number of studies of
the mechanism of treatment. To maintain a continuing function and make long term
planning feasible, it is recommended that a Research Service be established; that
be an integral part of hospital organization with a continuing annual budget.
it
A proposed organization is included in this report, with a projected annual budget
of 3,560,000 - $570,000; and with a minimum budget 1955—56 of $536,100.
The

This report approved by the Research Committee April 27, 1955.

Respectfully submitted,
Max

Fink,

M.D.

Director of Research

�Viva—v Wu'I-v-r

“IV 11; 1955

mom

DR. M. FINE

SUBJECT:

MOW

REPORT, RESEARCH SERVICE «- APRIL

1. My louder ectiviw this month has been the planning and preeentim to
the Director, the Research Committee end to the Medical Affairs
a
plan for a research department. This was discussed at length at the hoepdtel.
and then presented to the Research Omittee, April 27th and approved. It
was later presented on May 3rd to the Medical Affairs Oomittee.
2. Research pro cots underm:
a. BM 2: theetndy ienowinmllewingendueam followingconoeoutive patients with all our indiciee of change.

(30th

"

b. Ambivilence: Our equipment for techietoecopy hue been set
up. Correlations between clinical evaluations between embivilunce made by Dr.
Tmohow and tween, and the laboratory studies using the techietoecope and
the TAT test, are new in pmgmee.
\

electrouetimuletore and oscilloscope have been coordineted and preliminary measurements are being made in the alteration in tactile
perception in electnoehock patients.
(I. Serpaeil project continues despite some difficulties in the
choice of patients.

c.

The

'

e. Subculture: This comittee has continued ite work despite
a number of hwering developments. This eppointment of Dr. Navarro to the
adolescent pavilion hue limited the amount or time available for this project.
Simlteneouely, Dr. Outwits announced that because of the pressure of other
activities, he would be unable to devote the mountﬂ‘ time previously outin-

eted to the project. For the meanwhile, the committee
elucidating a protocol.

is

continuing and in

Projects begun: Dr's Ledemn end Emberg have begun a study or
the use of divided insulin doses and their effect on come levels.
3‘.

attended: Dr. Knhn attended the Eastern Psychological Asediction nee
e in Philedelphin, Ind participated in a panel and presented a
paper based npm his work at the hunt Sinai Hoepital. I attended the April
meeting of the New York Neurologic Society.
1;.

'

p

3

"

5. Pipers published: In the Joumel or the Hillside Hospital, the

”th1

Test

in

Mental Petientc' by Dr. Kuhn, Weinetein and myself.

.

�MEMORANDUM

Dr. Joseph so A. Miller, Mono
FROM: Dr. Max Fink
SUBJECT; Monthly report, Reaearoh Service
T08

1. Activities of

- Boy

of the Research Service during the month
have been attendance at various psychiatric matings; the presentation of
papers; and tho continuation of ongoing projects.
members

2. Papers Presented: (c)
The paper entitled "RelatiOn of
want in Eleotroshockﬂ was read,
~

Kwalwasser.

To

.
and Learning to Improve»

the Electroahcck Rosearoh Association

Changes in Memory
hy title, by Mr. Karin, Dr. Fink, and Dr.
This paper received the Annual Prize Award of the association.

(b) To the American Psychiatric Association, the paper entitled
"Relationship Betucon Altered Brain Function and Denial in Electroshook
Therapy“ was presented by Dr. Kahn and Dr. ?ink.

‘(c)

the resident's meeting of tho New York Neurologic Socioty,
Dr. Grnubert road the paper 'Daluaional Rodnplication of Parts of the Body
After Insulin Coma Thorapygﬁ
To

final manuscripts of these three paperc
Committee, at the end of the month.
The

3. Meetings uttendod:

were sent

to the Resoarch

or the Research Service attended the
following meetings: Amorican Psychosomatic Society, American Psychiatric
Association, Electroshock Ecuooroh Association - all at Atlantic City.

Also the

Nowhers

York Neurologic Society and the American Psychopathological
Association in New York City.

‘

How

h. Notes regarding ongoing projects: a. Further data has been con
llected for the two projects - EST # 2 and Ambivalence.
b. Serposil: Some difficulties in the selection were cleared
in conferences with Dr. Loderman and Dr; Blumberg. Later on in the month
Dr. Laderman requcsted that he be relieved of working on this project except in the aupervisony role since he has to many other activities. The
project will continue with Dr; chhspress assuming the major psychiatric
role.
0. Subculture: Furthor work in preparing a protocol has continued
during the month despite the hampering difficulty of the nooignaticn of
Dr. Gurvito and the increased activities of Dr. Navarre. It is my anticipaticn that a satisfactony protocol may be available by the and of the

month.

up

�S. New Projects: Following an initial meeting with Dr. Loon Helium:
of the Sloan Kettering Institute on April 25th further dismsions were
held at the hospital between Dr. Goldenberg and myself and a second visit
to the institute was made on May 23rd. With the elucidation of their
program, our own protocol is being prepared and will be submitted to the
Research Committee and Medical Dimctor within the next few days.
‘

The Annual Prim Award of
$100.00 was donated to the

the Electmshock Research
urea]. Strauss Research Fund,
Association for
also renewal mquest for tho grant. of the 0.3. Public Health Service were
submitted on May 3rd.

6. Funds:

7. Papers Published: None.

�DOW

0! 310011-131.” eeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Dr. 8.

mm

MW
1.

PROGRESS

mom,

m

Gold“

19”

WtionctchlorpromeineendSeryuilinSem,Urineend
embroepdnel Fluid.

Wire

inthodhesbemdevelopedrorthe detemiutionor
drugesnd
rented elheloidel compounds in blood end urine. The procedure involves extinction
orthe buiriedi‘luidwith heptsneendreextraetionottheecupoundfromthe

heptsne leyer with hydrochloric acid. an mixing the acid solution with methyl
orange e complex is formed which dissolved in ethyl.” dichloride to give I: soln.
whose color in directly proportionel to the amount of chlorpromssine, eerpcsil,

or other elkeloid origindqureeent intheteettluid. Adeteiled etudyhes
eleo bean nude or the specificity of the melytiecl method.

Prelim-:7 results

obtained with serum of petiente indicate an «trench
rapid rate of dieeppesrsnee or the mister-ed meterinl. Studies are being
mderteken to determine whether this 1e due to repid elimination, detonticetion,
or both, and whether the degree or retention of the drugs can be correlated in
em we: with their clinical effectiveneee.

2. Inhibition of Sena Cholinestereee by Hallucinogen»

stub wee reemd or en intereeting observation that had been made in
our lobe. lest Sept... 195:. but not subsequmtly followed up became of leek of
personnel. it that time it was noted that LSD 25 is e potmt inhibitor of mm
11;.
The

cholinesterese.
question eroee as to whether thie phenomenon correlates
in may we; with the echisogenic ection of LSD 25, end whether hallucinogenic in
general have 1 eimer effect on cholineetereee from serum, cells, end brain.
serum

Prelilinery results with serum cholineetereee indicate a perelleliem between
hallucinogenic eetivity of the 3 druge teeted, listed in the order or decreasing
activity, '13., lysergic acid diethylenide &gt; lyeergie seid monoethylamide &gt;
mecsline, end their ability to inhibit the anyone.
3. Steroid

3mm. Conjugate

Studies.

einple method hec been found for eliminating the protein and alkaloid
interference with steroid sulfate cnelyeis or biological fluids. Procedure
involves eddition of alkali to diesoeiete steroid sulfate bound to protein,
followed by extraction with lipid oolvente end treatment with e eulronie eeid
resin to remove excess bees as well a: tree alkaloid. Progreee along theee
lines has been extremely rapid and fruitful. It hes also been discovered that
the home sulfates ere synthesized by the liver. Chromtomphic end paper
electrophoretio methods are being adopted ee companion tools to our dye teehnie
in order to establish the identity or the component hormone conjugates.
A

�mm
.1..qu
MW
“mm.o
1. Papa

of

biological fluids to Maniac tho
1nd
alkaloidol
drugo,
prosciu- in
mm...

Italics

“mid

on

2. Preparation for following out. to ho conduct-d on blood and urino or
tor urinary “mid studios hy Slow-Kauai.“
mend
opp-oval): steroid sum». uhloido, phosphorus,
plating
'

fum- W151"

chemo-two, ma poooihly total

War;
of

1W

Wm.

W,
2.xuuam1cmmmmmmummnmidmum;

1.

K.
Board

with! ham Education “pm to
orients." July lot, 1955.

mmwﬂmﬁal

3mm}: Mo.

Hmoido
sponsorship by tho

�mm mm:

199N955

Themuumhmﬁuﬂoaatthohoammm

for-1mm

uiththeappdnhamtofﬂr.mnnkuninctorefﬁomm0¢tomg
mdmop‘muwuybytheostamahnntdnnmhurumbym

Humans-a.

what.

mmmmmmmamm
mud
sum mm
m
the

grunts

Health Service and

wmmmmmmrerhmmwmmmud

mmmmmrormumubymmunmm.

mummcemmamwlymmdmamr

otwwmgmlmwotfulds.whhstyeuamw«fthe

dehwkmmdam.meﬁmtstwmmd

mmntyotWMhWnMMmtanmmtefarm

Wtfommtmﬁmnt.

Thamsultaofthiaam

mummmmttmmwmmﬁmmwmpm
mumedtotmmamhockhmhsmmmdmu

wmmrmmmmmmhdem. Mummtha

um

of

am

toineludofurﬂmr

thanpym cumming;

and lave becnhroadamd

upcﬂnftheWsinﬁwedbyinsMasmuu

0W.mammal

studio! m the effects at

11:11am:

Wymlﬁudhsmmrpdmmdchlmmmgmd

anwamw «mm museum“!

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67244">
                <text>Progress and annual reports; research activities (folder title 1/2).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67245">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67246">
                <text>mfp-03-01-001-0-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67247">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67248">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67249">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67250">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67251">
                <text>Annual report - research; Biochemical research; Research and pUblications of the Department of Psychology; Annual Report of Department of Neurology, Hillside Hospital; Letters to Dr. Miller (Budget); Research Progress Report</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67252">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67253">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80927">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87488">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94049">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100610">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6726" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3783">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/6d5d109f552158de5a99360da32ba4a2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cbe6f09f352080376a08471f0e47212a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="104409">
                    <text>HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT. TRAINING AND RESEARCH

75-59 263RD

GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

STREET

FIELDSTONE

3-7300

JOSEPH S. A. MILLER. M. D.

MAURICE BACHRACH

MEDICAL DIRECTOR

ADMINISTRATOR

SIMON KWALWASSER. M. D.

Assoc.

June 27’ 1955

MEDICAL DIR.

Dear Dr. Fink:
This

is to

I

sure that there

acknowledge,
with thanks, the receipt of $100
for the Research Fund, from
yourself and your Associates,
Hyman Karin and Simon Kwalwasser.
no need

am

for us to

tell

you

is

of the

importance of our research program.
The Directors are appreciative of
the sentiment underlying your gift
of this $100. to Hillside Hospital.
Very

sincerely yours

Maurice Bachrach
MBzhm

cc: Dr. Kwalwasser
Dr. Miller
Mr. Korin

AN AFFILIATE OF FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK

�June 30, 1955

Somatic Therapy'fbsearch Program 1955-57
From the Research

Service of the Hillside Hospital

mode
of
action
the
to
investigate
A. AIMS: It is the purpose of this study
We
do
by
this
to
plan
mental
illness.
of somatic therapies in
and
personality
behavioral
of
physiological,
the systematic investigation

factors which
B.

may

be involved.

mechanism
conc‘eming
the
therapeutic
Although many theories

BACKGROUND:

been
have
they
advanced,
been
have
of the somatic therapies

cannot
validity
their
that
either empirically disproved, or, are so vague

be

and
hypothesis,
meaningful
more
of
a
development
the
More
recently,
tested.
new methods of study have provided the opportunity

ion. In l952,'ﬂeinstein

and Kahn (Amer.

for a fruitful investigat-

Journal Psychiatry l923 22-26) sug-

of
milieu
a
creating
by
improvement
to
gested that the somatic therapies lead
Some
could
of
denial
operate.
anisms
mec
in.which
function
brain
altered

support for this

hypothesis has been found in the

literature. Carter

(Am.

earlier work of Janis,
unpleasant life memories after

the
of
some
confirmed
1953)
has
§5
330,
Psychologist
of
selective
forgetting
there
is
showing that

electroshock.

non—emotional
and
emotional
of
Using tachistoscopic presentation

demonstrated
1953)
hhS,
§5
(Am.
Psychologist
words, Teicher

that

of repression" to emotional stimuli occur in the post-shock

state.

For the past year and a half preliminary studies

"mechanisms

investigating this

done
been
have
hypothesis

at these laboratories at Hillside Hospital.

results to date

striking.

have been

patients were followed.with serial
taneous

tactile

Twenty—four

The

consecutive electroshock

electroencephalograms and amytal, simul-

perceptual and memory

tests.

A

marked

correlation between

�.02.
improvement and

early, persistent

alogram, and in the amytal

tests

was observed.

appear, improvement did not occur.

sistent

and severe changes on the electroenceph-

It is

If

such changes did not

our conclusion that early and per-

sufficient, prepossible to predict

changes in these indices are a necessary, though not

make
These
observations
improvement.
for
it
requisite
the short term response to therapy during the second and third

week of

treat-

ment.
A

report

on

the amytal test results was presented at the recent meet-

ing of the American Psychiatric Association (May 1955) and submitted fer public-

Electroshock
the
At
of
of
meeting
American
Journal
a
Psychiatry.
the
to
ation
Research Association on

May

8th, a report of the changes in

memory and

learn-

This
was
treatment
presented.
electroshock
of
the
course
ing occurring during
he
Award
citation
Association.
the
of
Annual
Prize
awarded
the
was
report

noted the methodology as exemplary, and offering a

fruitful

method of study-

ing electroshock.
Concomitant with these

studies,t7e

have followed

patients

on

insulin

therapy. Recent reports onthe value of prolonged coma as the basis for
improvement (Kwalwasser and Caplan: J. Hillside Hospital l; 1&amp;5, 1952; Revitch,
coma

E.

:

Neurol.
Arch
A.M.A.
Rowsell:
and
195h;
shagass
72,
Quart.
ﬁg;
Psychiat.

and Psychiat. 225 705, l95h; and Yeager
195h)

In one

gt 3;; J.

Nerv.

&amp;

Ment. Dis. llgg h35,

2
the
over
studies
past
in
years.
in our patients
unusual case report the direct relationship between altered brain fun-

have been confirmed

(Delusional
demonstrated
Reduplication
been
has
and
improvement
denial
ction,
of Parts of the Body After Insulin Coma Therapy, J. Hillside Hospital, 1955,

in press).
C.

METHOD:

1.

we

plan to verify and amplify our preliminary observations on

the relation of changes in behavior to altered brain function after
somatic treatment.

�-3”

E.A. and Kahn,

sease,

Am.

electroshock will be given amytal tests (heinstein,
DiBrain
Sodium
In
Organic
Use
Amobarbital
of
Diagnostic

Patients

(a)

3.:

on

J. Psychiatlggf

Test" for Brain Disease:

889—89h, 1953;

Its

Serial Administration of the

"Amytal

Arch
A.M.A.
Value,
and
Prognostic
Diagnostic

and
before
and
electroencephalograms
l95h)
Neurol. and Psychiat. 1;; 217-226,
treatment.
make
be
a
used
to
This
will
data
preat stated intervals during

diction of the short term response to treatment.
(b)

Double simultaneous

tactile perceptual tests will

using threshold electrical stimulation.

be

carried out

Using two Grass Sh-B stimulators,

to
be
his
for
tested
ability
the
will
patient
monitored by an oscillograph,
of
his
body.
different
parts
to
simultaneously
two
stimuli
applied
perceive
shown
to
been
previously
has
stimulation
simultaneous
double
of
technique
hé-SB,
g}
Neurology,
(Fink
function
3},
be a good index of altered brain
at
The

January, 1952).

By

applying this highly refined technique

it is hoped that

elicited.
be
will
patients
tests,

changes in brain function which are not otherwise apparent

will

be

and
amytal
of
electroencephalognmn
the
case
in
tested before and at stated intervals during treatment.

As

2.

Other Physiological procedures will be carried out in con-

junction with the tests above.
(a) Each patient will be given the mecholyl-epinephrine

cribed by Funkenstein and associates
The

results will

(J. Nerv.

(b)

sulin

coma

as des-

Ment. Dis. Egg: h09, Nov. 19h8).

be compared with the work of previous

as with the results of our other physiological

test

investigators as well

tests.

and
electroshock
of
undergoing
Biochemical testing
patients

treatment have been in progress for

some time

in-

in these laboratories.

In this series of patients, estimates of urinary ketosteroid excretionxates
Simultaneously
esexcretion
rate.
be
post-treatment
to
compared
their
will

timates of steroid sulphates; phosphatase; and blood levels of steroid sulphate,

�«hphosphorus, phosphatase and

total alkaloid will

be done.

of
many
that
investigation
3. It has been evident in our preliminary
months.
within
six
treatment
somatic
relapse
the patients tm.t improve after
imp
of
duration
the
to
involved
in
regard
The critical problem of the factors
provement

is also to

be

studied.

One

hypothesis

now

under investigation

is

related to the premorbid personality.
denial"
verbal
of
the
"explicit
characteristics
the
with
patients
Specifically,
Denial
Factors
in
Personality
R.L.:
and
Kahn,
personality (Mainstein, E.A.

that sustained improvement

may be

1953)
March,
1-13,
ﬁg:
Psychiat.

Illness, A.H.A. Arch. Neurol.
more likely to maintain improvement, than patients
&amp;

of

who do

will

be

not have this pre-

morbid personality makeup.

(a)
two

with
interviews
by
personality
of
premorbid
the
Evaluation

close relatives will

airre will

be used to

be made

elicit

dictive value such as need to

for each patient.

A

standardized question-

characterological factors, which
be

at least

may

have

pre-

right, prestige-consciousness, sensitivity

toczﬁticismand compulsive drive.
words:
and
of
pictures
(b) Tachistoscopic presentation

The

threshold

material
be
compared.with
will
illness
to
related
levels of subject matter
characterological
for
be
evaluated
data
This
will
of more indifferent nature.
assessed
be
as
quantwill
in
response
alterations
In
addition,
indications.

itative indices of denial.
(c)

and
be
Rorschach
given
will
and
the
Test
The Thematic Appereeption

evaluated for the

same

factors as the personality interviews.

to
of
response
predictions
material,
the
of
personality
(d)
the basis
of
treatment
the
to
start
Prior
made
at different periods..
treatment will be
1)
those
unthree
to
possibilities:
according
be
classified
patients will
On

and
temporarily;
moderately
or
to
improve
2)
those
likely
to
improve;
likely
3) those

improvement
and
sustained
marked
maintain
to
likely

(for at least

6

�.5.
Prediction will also be

months).

made

during the course of treatment (the

third weekfbr the electroshock patients) taking into account the physiological
At
the
of
factors.
the
premorbid
personality
well
analysis
indices as
as
conclusion of treatment patients will be evaluated for actual immediate response to the treatment. Those

who showed some improvement

ified again according to whether or not improvement will

will then

be

be

class-

sustained.

h. Evaluation of the change in behavior of patients undergoing treatment

will

Such

ratings will be

be made on the

basis of a modification of the

made

independently of

all

Malamud

the other

rating scales.

test results

by a

supervising psychiatrist.
D.

FACILITIES AVAILABLE:

l.

Hillside Hospital is a

200 bed

voluntary hospital

for psychiatric care. All patients subjected to phy—
siological therapies are available for study. Periods of hospitalization.are
2-8 months; and a h-6 week observation period is generally available prior to
the

institution
A

of physical therapy.

Research Service has been established, with a

full

time professional

staff of a Director (neuropsychiatrist); assistant in psychiatry; biochemist
EEG
and
technician
(Ph.D.)
research
and assistant chemist;
neurophysiologist
and secretary. A full time psychologist and two chemists are associated on a
project basis.
Laboratory
a Medcraft D-8,
two

S—hB

8

facilities include:

(a) Electroencephalographic unit with

channel instrument; (b) Neurophysiological laboratory with

Grass stimulators,

Du Mont

# 3&amp;0

R

oscillograph; two synchronized tach-

Biochemical
(0)
laband
equipment;
electronic
auxiliary
projectors
istoscopic
the
followwith
and
of
equipped
1000
with
feet
laboratory
space
square
oratory

ing major items:

Beckman

spectrophotometer,'Warburg respirator, Coleman Spect-

rophotometer, and radioisotope unit following the basic specifications of the
A.E.C.

�2. Personnel:
(a) Dr.

Max

Fink, M.D., Director of Research: After undergrad-

uate studies at the University College of

his

D-A.

New

York University where he received

cunllaude with Honors in Biology in l9h2, he attended the

New

York

University College of Medicine, graduating in 19h5. After a rotating interneship he served in the

U.SL Army, where he

attended the School of Military

Neuropsychiatry.

training

Formal neurologic
York

(19h8-l9h9) and

was

received at Montefiore Hospital in

at Bellevue Hospital

(

l9h9-1951). Formal psychiatric

training received at Bellevue Psychiatric HOSpital (6
Hillside Hospital (1952).
and
During 1951,
again

in 1953,

New

at

months 1950) and then

he was a research fellow of the Nat-

ional Foundation for Infantile Paralysis,

first at

of Medicine and then at Mount Sinai Hospital in

New

New

York University College

York.

Both periods of

study were under the supervision of Dr. Iorris B. Bender.

In 1952 he was certified in Neurology by the Amer. Board of Psychiatry
and Neurology, and was granted complementary
May

certification in Psychiatry in

l95h. Simultaneously he attended and.gsunnﬁndfrom the William Alanson

Institute of Psychoanalysis, Psychiatry
Certificate for Physicians in January 1953.

White

and Psychology, receiving

(b) Dr. Jeseph Jeffe, M.D., Assistant in Psychiatry:

undergraduate studies

at

their

Following

Columbia College (B.A., l9hh), Dr. Jaffe attended the

New

York University College of Medicine, and was granted

was

elected to Alpha

Omega

Alpha.

He was

an interne

his

M.D.

in 19h7.

He

at the Morrisania City

Hospital, and then began three years intensive study at the Bellevue Psychiatric

Hospital. First as a resident in psychiatry, theniizneurology, and he

com»

pleted his studies as a U.S.P.H.3. post-doctoral research fellow under the
supervision of Dr. Morris B. Bender.

�~7—

From 1951

to

1953 he was

in the United States Air Force.

He

graduated from

the School of Aviation Medicine and was Chief Psychiatrist at the Mitchell

Air Force Base Hospital.
Since discharge from the military service he has been in the private

practice of psychiatry.

He

was

certified in psychiatry

by the American Board

of Psychiatry and Neurology in 1953. Since 19h? he has been a candidate in
White
Psyof
Psychoanalysis,
Alanson
Institute
William
the
at
psychoanalysis
in
Research
Assistant
two
and
the
and
for
past
years
Peychology;
chiatry

Neurology at the Mount Sinai Hospital of
(0)

New

York.

Dr. Robert L. Kahn, Fh.D.: Assistant in Neurophysiology:

After graduation from Brooklyn College
Columbia University which was

United States Army.

in l9h0, he started graduate

interrupted

by

work

at

four years of service in the

In the army he went to Clinical Psychology School and

served as psychologist in various hOSpitals within this country and overseas.
On leaving the army he became a Research Psychologist in the Department of
Neurology of the Mount Sinai Hospital in

the supervision of Dr.
time.

To

date,

M. B.

New

York, where he has worked under

Bender and Dr. E. A. Weinstein up to the present

he has been an author of more than twenty

co-author of the monograph.

"Denial of Illness:

ASpects" which was published

in

Symbolic and Physiological

May, 1955.

received his Ph. D. from the

He

publications, and is

New

York University School of Graduate

Arts and Sciences in 1953, and was an instructor of psychology
and Hunter Colleges

sultant to the

New

for
York

at

Brooklyn

For the past two years he has been a con-

years.
State Department of Mental Hygiene and has conducted
two

training programs in several of thé mental hospitals.
(d)
Chemist:

A

Dr. Harry Goldenberg, Ph.D.: Director of Laboratories and Chief

Trethe
of
he
where
was
a
C.C.N.Y.
l9hh,
of
recipient
in
graduate

maine Scholarship and graduated cum laude, Dr. Goldenberg received

his Ph.D. in

�~8l9h9 from the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn.
(who-ll?)
Institute
the
Polytechnic
at
biochemistry

He

(1951 to date).' In l9h7-h9

National Institute
U.S.P.H.S. project

he was a Research Fellow

an
been
has
and

in

instructor in

at Brooklyn College
enzymology of the

of Health, and from 1950 to 1952 he was a chemist to a

at

Jewish Hospital of Broeklyn studying enzyme methods in

clinical chemistry.
(e)

Mr. Hyman Korin, Research

Assistant (Psychology): Following four
College of the City of

military service, he matriculated at
and received his B.S. in 19h? and his M.S. in 1950. During

years of

New

York

1951-52 he was

Ph.D.
his
for
and
matriculated
Sinai
Hospital
psychology interns at the
in
Research
Assistant
been
1953
has
he
June
Since
New
York
University.
at
thesis
doctoral
his
completed
and
has
recently
Psychology at Hillside Hospital
Mount

on "The

Effects of Electroshock on Retroactive Inhibaticn."
3. Publications:

Recent publications of the Research Service include:
The Amytal

Test in Patients with Mental Illness,

1955.
3-13,
ii:
Hospital,
Hillside
J.

Electroshock,
in
Improvement
and
to
Memory
Learning
of
in
Changes
Relation

press).

Conf. Neurologica, 1955 (In

Delusional reduplication of Parts of the Body After Insulin

J. Hillside Hospital,

1955

(

Therapy,

In press).

Relation Between Altered Brain Function and Denial
Amer.

Coma

in Electroshock Therapy,

J. Psychiatry (submitted).

Rectification of Nonlinear Beer's

Law

Plots, Anal.

Chem.

gé: 690, l9Sh.

Bioand
Biochem.
Arch
Curves,
Enzyme
Non-Linear
Activity
Rectification on

phys., ﬁg;

288, l95h.

�July 1, 1955
BUDGET

l.

-.

RESEARCH SERVICE,

PERSOM'EL

1955-56
EFF—ES.

Director of Research

15,000

-

BD OF DIRECTORS

15,000

in Psychiatry

7,200

Research Assistant in Neurophys.

7,500

Chief Chemist

8,200

Assistant Chemist

2,800

Research Assistant in Psychology

h,000

h,000

-

Assistant Chemist

h,000

h,000

~

Assistant Chemist

1,800

1,800

-

2,520

960

150

150

3,810

2,1uo

1,670

1,000

200

800

$ 57,980

$20,750

$37,230

Research Assistant

Secretary -

EEG

Technician

2.

EQUIPMENT

3.

CONSUMABLE

)4.

TMWBL-CONFERENCES

TOTAL

SUPPLIES

7,200

7,500

-

8,200

2,800

1,560

��your grant for the biochemm and neuroplvsiologiul
approved. A mpplamuzy grunt request fer $7992.00
apprum!
by the Public Health Serum for the 24—927 pmaeem This may will amt thsalary or Dr. R. him.

6.
grants were

A.

,

3

The ascend

In sdditionk protoccla were submitted thmgh Hr.

medatim.

m

Calm ta

the Hofheimr

�Department of Biochemistry

.................................

RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT, JULY-AUGUST

A. Major work

Dr. H. Goldenberg

1955

in Progress

1. Determination of Chlorpromazine in Blood and Urine
procedure for the colorimetric estimation of chlorpromazine and related
alkaloids, described in the June 1955 progress report, has been further refined
to permit detection of the extremely small amounts of drug circulating in blood.
The method is based on two new features: (1) The finding that drugs can be
quantitatively extracted from biological fluids with a single portion of an
ethylene dichloride-ether solvent mixture, and (2) The use of a three—phase solvent
dye partition system of analysis.
The

Clinical data are also being obtained on bound as well as free circulating
promazine, based on the use of hot acid to liberate the conjugated drug.
2. Inhibition of Cholinesterase by Hallucinogens
These studies are being continued as indicated

in the prior report.

3. Steroid Sulfate Conjugates
All but one of the major problems involved in the assay of steroid sulfate
metabolism.in mental disease have now been solved. A novel device has been
introduced for eliminating the interference with our test due to phenol sulfates
in blood and urine. A two-phase system incorporating dicyclohexylamine (DCHA) as
a complexing agent effectively separates the steroid from the phenol sulfates,
permitting their unequivocal determination. The procedure for serum is now as
follows:

is treated with alkali to release the hormone conjugates.
b. A lipid solvent is added to precipitate the proteins and simultaneously
extract the hormones.
DCHA
The
and
between
to
brought
is
dryness
supernate
partitioned
c.
lipid
a.

Serum

and chloroform.

free steroid sulfates are released by shaking the chloroform extracts
with acidic resin.
e. Final assay of the sulfate conjugates is effected by adding dye and reading
the color.
d.

The

considerable amount of clinical data have already been obtained on normal
people and on patients selected for independent studies by the Sloan-Kettering
Institute. An immediate correlation has been established in our laboratory
between urinary conjugate levels and sex, males excreting about twice as much
conjugate as females. This ties in well with what is known of steroid metabolism
A

�and tends to confirm the

validity of the method.
Attention is now being devoted to fractionation of the steroid hormones in
conjugate form. Paper electrophoresis has proven inadequate for the purpose.
Paper chromatography is more successful and is under continuing study.
B. Papers, Lectures and Conferences

following papers are in preparation: (1) "Colorimetric Determination of
Alkaloids, with Particular Reference to Chlorpromazine", and (2) "Steroid Sulfate
Conjugates. II. Colorimetric Microestimation".
The

C. Funds and Personnel Changes

1. Research Grant #A-675 from the National Institutes of Health
the fiscal period Sept. 1955 - Aug. 1956.
2. Messrs. Michael Miller and Spencer Parness terminated
in the laboratory at the end of August.

cc. to: Dr. Fink
Dr. Miller

their

was renewed

for

summer employment

�Department of Biochemistry

.................................

RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORTI SEPTEMBER

-

A. Major werk

Dr. H. Goldenberg

12§§

in Progress

1. Determination of Chlorpromazine in Biological Fluids
As a result of repeated analyses of blood drawn from patients receiving
chlorpromazine, the circulating blood level has been established as less than
1 microgram per ml. serum. The three-phase solvent dye partition scheme of
analysis mentioned in the previous report has therefore been adopted as the only
method capable of detecting the extremely minute amounts of drug in peripheral
blood. A new shaking machine has just been obtained from the A.H. Thomas 60.,
Philadelphia, to permit application of the method on a broad scale.
question naturally arises as to the metabolic fate of chlorpromazine
in humans. We have recently detected in patients! urine an ether-soluble carboxylic acid which reacts with ferric chloride and appears to be an oxidative
byhproduct of chlorpromazine metabolism.
The

2. Inhibition of Cholinesterase by Hallucinogens

three-phase system mentioned above has been found applicable to the
analysis of LSD 25 as well as chlorpromazine and serpasil. By combining this
observation with the earlier discovery of the inhibitory effect of LSD 25 on
human serum cholinesterase, it is now possible to relate the enzyme inhibitory
action to the alkaloid concentration in "unknown" samples of fluid and so deter—
mine the specific molar inhibitory action at the 0.1 microgram level. This
amounts, in effectI to the first sensitive chemical test ever reported for the
detection of LSD 25 and related hallucinogens.
The

3. Steroid Sulfate Conjugates
work progressing

cc. to: Dr.

essentially as described in JulyhAugust report.

Fink
Dr. Joe. S.A. Miller
M.

�TJ'M‘

W10,”

kW!“ mmMume

mmﬁmmmam.mu¢wmtbmmmm
dﬁltﬂdmﬁord’pﬁiﬁﬁd‘ﬂ.
7

mauummm

�WW

Wmmtmmmunmmngmpm.
3.)

nmmmm
Wamwmm‘m M.anummt.mk

mmmwmmummmm.w.
mmrpmhmmmmdmdt

“Wumm
Mnuwhmwmmmmmmmunm

�.3.

«W.
wammnwunm-Wmum.
Athd.w.MMmmumngmmu

m ﬂui- num- um‘ «hummus. tad

but

mumummmwmmmmmmmm
mmmmmchob.
mmummmuummmw.
max-m:-

mmmdmwmmmmumm
arm-m
1

'

ranoummwmsmummmmsu

?

memum:mW.mm-n
mmmmupmmmruamrm

_

um

i

M

W’ mWrmmwn-m
A.)

awrmm.hmmmnmwmuuuuu
¥

.

McMrahmmwuﬂaMde-u
Itummumuumt
WWSMMWM
mmwumramn.
mum

women-mm
.thmmmmwmubaummmmpm
‘

‘

3.9

ammmammwmummmmam
Dr.3hu,nhobndhndm
WthathuhtaW.
Manama-.Wumwmmmmmm
’mmmnmmpammmmwwmmmu
thramutmm,mmmmmm-mm
rummsmum. mumnwmmwumm

‘

�.5.

nth-Wm
mmmummmwmwmoamm

mmpummmmrmmuu.

arm-«mmgmnwnmm.

Doughnuts-mam

W
bmmammwmmmmmmw,
«3.6mummam.
M

A.)

mwmmmwmwww

MiamﬁmmuVMWqutmcw

W‘tmhmmwmammmnmm
mmmammunmm‘mmrmunmm
I.) mmmmmmmwmhm¥
[wwlmmumumummummmm
ﬂan

«mama-Wm.
It.)

men-mmnmmwmw
umnwmmmmammmuunmmu
ﬁner-matey». nwmrmxmmmmwu
mmmmmammmmnwnma;mmnw
1.)

WW

mhmummunmm
Mud
1mm
m
Amuse.
“raw
W
0‘an
‘mmmwnmwmmmnbmm.
3.)

Du.'llhn.

mamwmtmpnmmummnmmwm
mm

mum
MWWW
muncd‘tblnnmSwuquMummmedm
mumsmmmuwwmmmwnm m
a.)

�kW3lemwhtb
Mun-dun
mrmmmwdthwmdmmm
A.)

nun-Moth.“
B.)

mammm,ummm
,1

ummumgmumwtummrmum
Mm'wm-mmuwmmmuvmm
wan.

wwwhummrww‘.’
c.)

magnum-1mm «numb-mu;

WuﬂthMWdhu-lmmiuuMN
“Widthmrdummnuuhmmm.
6-)

W
A.)

nan-13mm: ‘MmmMmam

Wmmwumnmammxpwm-w
wuuxabmummeuuumMW.Mumu‘mmmmum.hmc
n.)
hummus-«momma

0on1“...

wmmmwmmmumaAuumamm-w

Wmtquolmy
a.)
my:
Dr.

Project:

mum; our Manon

www.mxmwmawammounmpma.

Thaw

Wuwmawrunnmtmwmmmuw

�m1.4

Magnum-ma.
B.)

Marmara!

W’agmhuuamm

than”.
than:
mWaﬂhMcmﬁu
mummm

WatWMIMﬁummmum-Mamm.mm
www.mmmmrummpumnuua¢
mmacmﬂmﬁnmnﬁurwtm
30mm): Mum

mm. w.

�mm.”

thmx‘mmumummmumumum

thus

of

Dr.

awammmmuummmmmmm
ml
Mull”, t» n:
kin
Win.
www.mrammwwmdmmmm
«lulu-Man,

tho

In

m,ammwmmmmmutbnpmmetam

�4-

nm. www.maruummmmowmwmaotu

“www.mmmmdmpmmpm.
a.) 80mm:

m-pmmtmmummnnh

Wuwmmummmgm
dWﬂMmIﬁnmmmMMltﬂﬁlﬁl. Mamba“
animautthimdatMOmth.

uranium that thin prudential} manna
I.)

u

ammm

Wmduungthowttumthu

emu:- put.
hunma.»
MM:
&amp;

m

bun

Mmenuh-nnnpb

MMNMWWMWwWMIlimIn
1Mrumtothutmtmtm
Mothrpumumbmmwa

twpmmemmmuammmommumm

�¢
ummummmmmuuhgmmn
dam It
All um patient: an amt-ma.
hummmwagwmgmsmmm ﬂux-four

WW.

and

mammuwuumnmmam.
“Mnuummumm. humannhhhobo
wwwmwmmmrmummm
new-cut.
‘

'

’*)"W 3mm amusmmmm

mum,mmurmmwtmm.

“In!!!

Wu:mraummwummdmm
Mechanism-heathen“. thmatmmmmt
m,munumrudumix.

WWW
MMWMWmhbdumtamem
3.)

“than

«ummammec'mumMMta-am
Mahmuqmwktum. nr.8h~.mmmuu

Wdhmwuuwmmumm
mmmmmpmmmmwwmmm

”wrumzmmmmmwmm-mum
{crumbs-Itch mumnmmmwumw

�*,~b.«.4‘

_.x

:a:

h3-memmM1ﬂ-dwuﬂm

matmmmuwMWunmumcc-u

mmdmw-usmmwmmm,nan
Wasmnmmwawmmnwm
mmmmwnwmmmunnmm
mmwmmmwwmhm
a.)

thmuMnmdm.mummm
“mummy-norm.
13-)

,W
1.1

Dummy—unannmwwm

umumnr.m'mnsnmuu¢mumm
nmmmxmmmmwu
Warm
m’mmamm~mmnmmuaww
WWW-t. a.)

mmmdmmm
Wmmumumnn.mnmwwmwmmm

�«5-

muomMqurmtmmau—amw
ﬂawuﬂlm.mrwm
m: A.)
hmnmmmmmwm
muss-dam
mrmmtwmwmmmcm.um
It)

“unmanned”...

mummmgummw
namuuumapmmmmtammrm
mmmmmmma-Wmmwmm
_

n.)

Itmmmmtm'm
ummmmuw.
MmMuWammm-‘Wmmmtcm

com.

mmudmu‘mmrnw.
c.)

mmwzmnr.4omn.mua

”Waumhmmmawmmmmu‘

W

atmuambmmamummm.
a.)

A.)

.

Mata-whom: mambo-ammu-

WmhmﬂWRMEtm-Withmw
mwilmantoDr.Mumm1uw‘hn-ﬂurdw
mauwmummmm:
I.)
~

msmvamotanmnmm:

0min...

“WMMWWMWWNWMMW

erumvalm. Prom Fohovingmdimim
WI
nan-.mmxmngamu-emmampmu Mam
a.) Dr.

mmnuuudatwrmnummmmmhmmm

�mum-mu.

n.)

nun-rum WWII-luminous

mummmnmummmwmm.

mum

Wummmmomumsnnamw-m
www.mum.mmummmma:

’mmuem‘mwmrvwgm

W

m&amp;%

11.:an

.

�\ﬂ
October 20, 1955
MEMORAEDUM

TO:

Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller

mom: Max Fink, 14.1).
SUBJECT:

Six Months Report of Research Activities at Hillside Hospital

At the request of the Chairman of the Medical Affairs Committee,
I am submitting this six month report of the activities of the Research
Service and associated research activities at the hospital. During this
period, numerous projects have been under investigation, our staff has expanded, and our space requirements were met. Two projects are being completed, and one project has just been instituted.
A.

PROGRESS

l.

hmw2:
In

ONGOIﬁG PROJECTS:

ELECT§9§§QQK #

Our second electroshock project was undertaken in March
project had clearly demon-

in September. Our first
strated that cerebral changes were essential to improvement and that these

1955, and completed

could be measured by the electroencephalogram and by amytal tests. 'Ue
also concluded that memory tests were a poor index of improvement and believed that there were specific psychological patterns indicative of denial
which were more prominent in the improved group than in the unimproved.
Following this study, the second project was undertaken and was designed
to demonstrate the reliability of the electroencephalogram and the amytal
tests for prognostic purposes; and to ascertain the characterological as‘ﬂe
term
be
term
the
short
which
and
in
results.
long
factors
might
pects
have studied.twenty-seven patients to date. The data of this project is
now being processed, and will be available following our six month follow
up

period, (which is from November to January).

data from the first study was pres nted at various meetings,
including the American Psychiatric Association, the Electroshock Research
Association, and the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers. The
memory data, presented by Mr. Korin at the Electroshocx Research Association
The

in

May, was awarded
The

their

annual prize.

electroshock project #

3

is

below), and will be instituted November 15.

now

in the planning stage (see

This project, which has been undertaken with Dr. Sidney Tarachow of
the Medical Board, has accomplished a considerable amount of its basic work.
Three approaches to the problem of measuring ambivalence have been accepted.
These include an interview evaluation; the thematic apperception test, and
tachistoscopic presentation of pictures. During this period of evaluating
methods, twenty-three patients have been studied. Dr. Tarachow has been
attending to this work, and the testing has been undertaken by dr. Korin.

2.

AMBIVALcNCE:
‘

�~2-

Serpasil evaluation study, undertaken at the end of last year, is com~
double
blind
a
by
been
have
studied
intensively
Seventeen
patients
pleted.
Blumberg
Drs.
andeachspress.
evaluated
by
The
now
data
being
is
technique.
To date, the clinical results are disappointing. Patients who were depressed,
who
were over-active
Patients
symptom.
of
this
manifested an eﬁag ration
disturbed/EnogIIeviation
of this activity but the psychotic ideation genand
of
secondary
induced
a
The
variety
intramuscular
dosages
erally persisted.
complaints. In the evaluation of'the mecholyl responses following serpasil,
The
blood
in
pressure response
all
subjects.
effect
consistent
was
a
there
of
this
presentation
considering
Dr.
and
Blumberg
is
lower
was significantly
data at the next meeting of the American Psychosomatic Society.
3.

SQRPASLL:

The

}

Preliminary studies by Dr. Laderman in
20 patients in a series of clinical
not
was
but
significant
this
alterations
and
behavioral
showed
symptom
studies
of
Shaw
evaluation
undertook
an
Dr.
In
mid-September,
in the doses used.
A
protocol
coma
therapy.
Thorazine as a possible substitute for insulin
French
and
Kline
submitted
Smith,
to
was
The
Research
Committee,
approved by
and approved, assuring us of adequate supplies for the duration of our proof
8,to
a
medication
for
period
receive
will
In
this
study,
patients
ject.
12 weeks, comparable to the insulin coma period. During this time, very
have
been
To
be
used.
patients
eight
date,
will
thorazine
of
doses
large
The
obser3600
1500
initial
from
to
The
daily.
mg.
dosages range
studied.
three
had
clinical
response;
a
show
significant
three
the
patients
vations

h.

THORAZINE:

and
one
symptoms,
toxic
developed
one
minimal
had
patient
changes;
patients
medthe
of
Cohen
and
Blumberg
Drs.
medication.
the
patient has just begun
our
using
to
permit
controls
the
have
contributed
necessary
ical department
such large doses of this potent drug.

Since June, Drs. Goldenberg
and Royce have been coopof
a
in
study
Sloan—Kettering
Institute
the
chemists
the
at
with
erating
the possible alteration in the keto-steroid excretion patterns in our patSince
June.
Committee
Research
in
by
our
This
was
approved
study
ients.
then five patients have been under investigation. The initial data is not
in
Dr.
Goldenberg
by
studied
Each
of
being
the
is
patients
available.
yet
his laboratory as well as by the chemists at the Institute.

5.

SLOAN KETTERIDG STUDY:

Dr. Goldenberg has been
occupied in studies measurand
acid
of
devising
the
effects
lysergic
estimating
ing chlorpromazine,
methods to measure steroid sulphate conjugates. This basic research is
to
which
to
we
apply
measurement
plan
of
methods
the
to
provide
necessary
our patients.
(a) Chlorpromazine: An ultra~sensitive technics has been
of
amounts
this drug.
microgram)
minute
(0.1
which
measure
can
developed
Golden—
Dr.
Thorazine,
of
number
By applying this to a
patients receiving
bloodstream.
the
amounts
in
small
appear
demonstrated
only
that
has
very
berg
LSD
has been
by
cholinesterase
The
LSD:
of
serum
(b)
inhibition
A
compounds.
demonstrated, and this test applied to other hallucinogenic
correlation between hallucinogenic activity and cholestestcrase inhibition
was found.

6.

BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH:

�*3“

a

(c) Steroid Sulphate Conjugates: ‘Nith the grant support from the
USIHS, methods to estimate these compounds have been devised. By studying
hormone
demonstrated
sulphates are synthat
Dr.
Goldenberg
liver slices,
of
the
level
in
difference
and
a
there
sex
is
that
the
thesized by
liver,
steroid excretion. Both these observations are of fundamental significance,
and will be presented to various societies this winter.
In the Department of Medicine, hrs.
Cohen and Blumberg have continued
Durand
the
electroshock
of
the
patients.
serpasil
studies
their Mocholyl
and
than
more
been
have
studied
to
additional
an
patients
this
period
ing
half have had more than one such evaluation. The serpasil group demonstrated
a significant alteration in their blood pressure patterns following this
done
be
and
been
will
has
The
correlated
not
data
electroshock
yet
drug.
as soon .8 our electroshock # 2 data is available.
7.

MECHOLYL:

Following the approval of this project
by the Research Committee last spring,
Drs. Navarre and Graubert had a number of meetings with members of the
Medical Board. Following these discussions, they have begun a pilot study
of one patient, and intend to evaluate those factors in the hospital environment which may be contributory to the patient's improvement. This
satisfactory
pilot study was udertaken in an effort to clarify a protocol
to the Ibsearch Conmittee and of sufficient quality to be submitted for

8.

SUBCULTURE:

To
some extent, this project
outside
to
organizations.
financial support
was hampered by the multiple duties of members of the committee and by
the resignation of Dr. Gurvitz. Since September, however, the committee has
been working very actively and it is anticipated that a satisfactory protocol will be available by the end of the year.

In June, following some
discussions concerning the
Laderman
and
Drs.
coma
of
insulin
doses
for
insulin
treatment,
correct
doses
between
the
multiple
relation
into
undertook
an
Blumberg
investigation
05 insulin and the blood glucose level. lt was anticipated that multiple
small doses of insulin might reduce blood sugar significantly earlier and
large dose. It was quickly determined,
for longer periods than a single
.)
however, that multiple small doses, even if the sum total was equal to a
This
and
of
depth.
coma
degree
a
not
did
satisfactory
produce
dose,
single
project is now being prepared for publication.

9.

B.

DIVERE'

I

SULIN

D

SE8:

PROJECTS PLANI‘IED:

November
#
the
third
Electroshock
3:
Beginning
let,
l.
electroshock project will be
undertaken. This study is designed to extend our experience with the factors
which may be relevant in both the long and short term clinical reSponses
following electroshock. Also, in this study specific emphasis is placed on
the psychiatric and language changes which follow electroshock treatment
and which we have been accustomed to calling "improvement." Dr. Joseph
Jaffe has prepared a number of specific studies, including detailed interviews with patients prior to and during treatment, in which specific aspects
of behavior and language will be assessed.

�a...
In this study, also, a basic problem in the perception of multiple
simultaneous tacti e stimuli will be undertaken. Under our original grant
from the United States Public Health Service, we were given funds to study
the problem of Satisfactorily delivering single and multiple independent
and
The
completed
was
designed
equipment
wave
impulses.
electrical square
in Septemler and for the past few weeks has been undergoing rigorous clindur«
be
and
will
applied
found
been
has
satisfactory
highly
ical tests. It
between
changes
the
of
relation
the
with
question
specific
ing this project
the
in
and
in
behavior,
changes
stimulation
tests
simultaneous
double
in
electroencephalogram and in amytal tests following electroshock.

2.

EIOC

‘thAL

APPLICATION OF

HEM

TESTS:

’

Dr. Golden—
berg has

completed.the pilot studies necessary to devise measures of Specific compounds. He believes these should be applied to our clinical population over
the next year. A specific protocol for this application is being prepared.

3.

For more
than a year,
has been interested in form-

EEQQNOSTIC IdDIGATQE§ﬂIﬂ ELECTROSHOCK:
'

‘

Dr. Karliner of the attending psychiatric staff
electroshock.
would
be
in
which
helpful
factors
some
prognostic
ulating
Discussions were held in June and at the suggestion of Dr. Miller, Dr. Karlbe
This
scale
will
evaluate
scale
to
prognosis.
iner prepared a special
months.
next
the
six
and
Committee
assessed
over
Research
the
to
presented
C.

STAFF CHANGES:

Dr. Joseph daffe, a practicing peychoanalyst, was
and
in
research
psychiatry,
assistant
Service
Research
as
appointed to the
behavioral
the
in
is
Dr.
interest
Jaffe's
work
on
September
began
lst. induced altered brain function and the
by
and language changes which are
relation between such changes and premorbid personality.
were resolved effectively
Lowenstein
of
the
floor
the
on
the
of
first
extension
the
laboratory
by
The
reduced.
been
tachistoscopic
have
also
Our
problems
equipment
building.
be
able
now
to
works
and
well.
are
into
alignment
was
brought
equipment

During

this period our space problem

simultaneously.
two
or
individually
pictures
tachistoscopically
present
The electric stimulatorsale functioning satisfactoraly so that we are now
able to produce isolated simultaneous square wave stimuli with the ability
to vary any of the essential parameters.
D.

FUNDS:

In May, we submitted an application to the United
Sept—
In
of
Dr.
Jaffe's
Service
Health
program.
for
support
Public
States
an
in
the
and
staff
interviewed
the
Frank
Jerome
came
to
hospital
Dr.
ember,
USPHS
the
from
in
we
anticipate a response
evaluation of our program.
mid—December. In June, we also submitted the necessary forms for second
renewals
and
both
and
Dr.
Goldenberg
myself,
both
renewal
for
grants
year
the
these
both
renewals,
note
for
that
to
were approved. It is important
overhead allowances were increased to 15%.
At the suggestion of Mr. Coleman, specific protocols of our re»
search program were submitted to the Kaufman, hoffheimer, and lttleson

Foundations during this period.

�-5the
been
for
has
Service
writing
Research
the
which
The protocol
of
Committee
Research
the
submitted
to
was
Ford Foundation grant pr gram
was
the
protocol
that
the
consensus
was
the Medical Board in September. It
suggestions,
their
Following
be
submitted.
not
and
that it
unsatisfactory
of
Drs.
the
with
cooperation
Service
Research
made
the
by
changes are being
Lenzer and Luttrell.
another
submit
application
to
am
planning
I
present time,
re—
March
for
meetings
their
to the USth in January for consideration at
to
an
application
am
contemplating
also
I
newal of our present program.
ambivalence
study,
the
for
for
Fund
support
for
Psychiatry
Foundation
the
as soon as the basic work is completed.
At the

E.

Q?HER.ACTIJITIES:

l.

ISRAEL 5T3§p?§nF9§E§Ei9F THE JOURNLL QEWEELEEERE
HOSPITAL: Following diScussion with Dr. Tarachow,

the Research Service has undertaken the
Tarachow
issuin
Dr.
work
in
and
ssisting
editorial
necessary secretarial
Journal.
Volume
of
Hillside
the
Commemorative
the
special
ing
2. ISRAEL STRAUSS LECTURE: Consideration is being
given by members of the
at
Discussion
is
next
the
lecture.
Committee
for
Lecture
Strauss
Israel
should
decision
and
a
final
candidates
of
number
present centered about a
be available by the end of November.

Respectfully submitted,
.

i

"’ -,"
’-

4

H7

”.51
‘

‘)

{I

1

«I

g.“

,--‘or

,.

‘

j

.

If

‘f‘ \

Fink, M.D.
Director of Research

Max

.

.

�Department of Biochemistry

.................................

Research Pro ress Re
Major werk

l.

rt,

Dr. H. Goldenberg

November l9§§

in Pregress

Chlorpromazine Studies

previous work has been summarized in the report for the 6 month period
ending Oct. 1955. We have subsequently learned from two representatives of the
Smith, Kline and French Laboratories that Drs. Salzman and Brodie, working at
the National Institutes_of Health, have identified chlorpromazine sulfoxide in
the urine of dogs and men after treatment with chlorpromazine. A sample of the
sulfoxide was requested from Smith, Kline and French and arrived the end of Nov.
Our

ultraviolet absorption spectrum of the sulfoxide was determined in
aqueous solution and compared to the Spectrum obtained with extracts from
patients! urine. A remarkable similarity was noted. On the basis of this and
other data accumulated in our lab., there can be no doubt but that urine from
mental patients receiving chlorpromazine contains: (1) chlorpromazine, (2) the
sulfoxide, (3) one or two other alkaloids of related structure, and (A) at least
one break-down product which yields a violet color with sulfuric acid, as contrasted to the pink colors typical of chlorpromazine and its sulfoxide.
The

Using our dye—partition scheme, the sulfoxide yields a color which is
roughly 1/5 the value given by chlorpromazine in equimolar concentrations.
Hence our dye scheme is not applicable as such to the analysis of fluids con~

taining both derivatives, unless some additional information is available on
the relative amounts present.‘ Fortunately the relative proportions can be
estimated from the extent to which the color is depressed by the addition of
ether. Nonetheless, we are withholding a manuscript dealing with chlorpromazine
analysis until this question is completely resolved.
Ultraviolet and chromatographic studies are to be undertaken soon to
establish the various chlorpromazine derivatives in urine and their clinical
significance.
2. Role of Toxic Agents in Mental Diseas

:

An Enzyme

Test for

LSD

first draft

of a manuscript entitled "Inhibition of Serum Cholinesterase
by Lysergic Acid Derivatives. Submicro Detection of LSD 25" has been completed.
Copies are to be forwarded to the Research Committee on Dec. 8th.
The

3. Steroid

Hormone Conjugates

Little progress has been made in this area in the last 6 weeks because of
a delay in construction of our chromatography cabinet and unavailability of
electrical parts needed for the circuit. This situation should be remedied by

the middle of December.
cc. to:

Dr. M. Fink
Dr. Jos. S.A. Miller

�ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY EVALUATION PROGRAM

from the

Research Service of the Hillside Hospital

Glen Oaks,

New

York

December 20, 1955

Alvin E. Coleman, President
Joseph S.A. Miller,

M. D.

Iiedical Director

�Electroshock Therapy Evaluation Program

em
I.

Aim

II. Background
III. Previous Studies
Development
and
Progress
in
Studies
IV.

Tests of Altered Brain Function
Premorbid Personality
of
Adaptation
Patterns
NonAVerbal
Verbal,
Evaluation of Improvement
Steroid Excretion Studies
Autonomic Studies
V.

Program Summary
Method

Significance

VI. Facilities Available

Laboratories
Personnel

VII. Budget
Present Budget
Requested Support

VIII. Appendix
References
Bibliography of Personnel

Page

�I.

E:
During the past few decades there has been an

of various

new somatic

intensified development

therapies for mental illness. Jhile

some have

even-

been
an
has
established
as
electroshock
therapy
into
fallen
disrepute,
tually
important and successful method for both immediate and long term results (1).

Despite

its

empirical usefulness, the

many

theories concerning the

mechanism

of this therapy have been either disproven or are so vague that their validity

tested. In a comprehensive review, Kalinowsky and Koch (2) emphasize the lack of information in this regard stating: ".......the theoretical
cannot be

aspects of the various somatic treatments
in the case of the shock treatments,

still

.....

are poorly understood, or, as

entirely obscure in their

mode

of

action."
The aim

of this program is to study the therapeutic mechanisms in electro-

convulsive therapy by the systematic investigation of behavioral, personality,

physiological and biochemical factors. Thile the program has electroconvulsive
therapy as its focus, considerable theoretical and experimental information can
be derived

to relate the

phenomena observed

in this therapy to other somatic

treatments such as lobotomy, electronarcosis and insulin coma.

�II.

BACKGROUND:

of
abundance
has
stimulated
an
electroconvulsive
therapy
of
use
and
the
Both
kind
theories
of
the
much
and
research.
exper(3)
hypotheses
The

of
interest
the
reflect
however,
particular
undertaken,
imental investigations
the
origin
frame
reference
of
regarding
and
theoretical
his
the investigator
of mental disorders.

Thus, each has been usually limited to one aspect of the

problem. In general, these theories

may be

differentiated between those that

emphasize physiological, biochemical, or psychological constructs.
A

who

classical physiological construct is exemplified

suggests that the various

by Gellhorn (h)

forms of shock therapy "act on the centers of

the autonomic system, produce intensive and prolonged sympathetico-adrenal
mental
activity,
hypothalamic-cortical
augmented
and
alter, through
discharges
processes and behavior."
psychogalvanic reflex,

The

varying responses of blood pressure, heart rate,

and other physiological indices to chemical

stresses are

obtained
been
has
data
huch
of
sympathetic reactivity.
interpreted as indices
to
and

Show

autonomic
reactivity,
in
this
induces
change
a
electroshock
therapy
that

(5)
coaworkers
and
support this
his
Funkenstein
by
studies
recent

conclusion.
Much

illness

and

biochemical study has been devoted to the relation between mental

steroid metabolism.

between ketosteroid excretion

Numerous

rates

instances (6) in which a relation

and change

in mental state following

electroshock therapy are reported, but the clinical difficulties in the
measurement of steroids have left this issue unresolved. Kore recent studies

excretion
to
the
total
steroids
between
individual
the
relationship
exploring
rate (7) utilize elaborate chromatographic separation technics.

�In a good review of the biochemical and neurophysiological hypotheses,
mode
the
view
the
that
evidence
to
justify
Ashby (8) presents experimental
of action of electroconvulsive therapy

is

through effects on the adrenal

cortex mediated by direct stimulation of the hypothysis.
Psychologic constructs generally fall into three designs

- studies

of

the psychic significance of the loss of consciousness; the relative importance of

ities

memory

loss;

and an estimate of the

subject's re-integrating abil-

the
Numerous
unemphasize
studies
of
confusion.
following a period

conscious significance of the treatment as a “rebirth which eliminates reand
exneed
punishment
for
of
a
satisfaction
narcissism"
a
(9);
or
gressed

piation for committed sins (10).
Amnesic effects are a common concomitant of treatment but most studies
of
these
The
significance
of
impairment.
the
nature
emphasize the temporary
defects for therapeutic results is

emphasized by numerous authors.

Data

is

the
on
emotional
charge
patreduces
the
treatment
that
presented to
emotionallyfor
of
induces
familiarity
loss
a
associations
(ll),
ient's
show

toned associations (12), or a selective forgetting of unpleasant

life

memories (13).
These constructs are

further elaborated by authors

who

believe that the

as
behavioral
responses
confusionalemate
including
of
an organic
induction
im»
electroshock
the
for
basis
is
over-reacting
euphoria, impulsiveness or
provement (1h).

A

more

umerated by Weinstein

&amp;

recent elaboration of this explanation is that enKahn

(15), described subsequently.

�-h-

adaptive
in
changes
proregard
explanations
of
psychologic
Another group
describe
(16)
and
Frosch
Impastato
mechanism.
cesses as the basic therapeutic
on
a
which
then
re-integrates
the
of
ego
electroshock as causing a dissolution
suggestopinion
similar
has
a
Alexander
of
adaptation.
previous or higher level

ing that

defensive
operations.
enhances
active
and
electroshock arouses

For

this

in'whii1
conditions
those
in
effective
such
is
therapy
that
he
asserts
reason
conp
in
ineffective
but
are
low
ebb, as in depressions,
such operations are at a
(17).
alerted
highly
already
ditions in which defensive operations are
most

two
in.which
Kahn
(15)
and
Another hypothesis was developed by weinstein

were
the
process
of
therapeutic
aspects

related.

They

asserted that the thera-

of
altered
milieu
of
a
creation
the
in
convulsions
lay
induced
of
action
peutic
is
of
problems
his
expression
symbolic
brain function in which the patient's
Their
them.
studies,
denying
of
form
the
explicitly
altered, particularly in

cerebral
with
with
patients
documented by an extensive neurologic experience
behavior.
in
adaptive
of
changes
a
function, amply demonstrate great variety

dys—

attention
(l9),
orientation
(18),
They describe altered patterns in language
manifestations
(21)
as
defect
of
and
awareness
(15b)
(20), sexual behavior
the
patient's
constitute
mechanisms
these
conclude
that
and
of adaptive behavior
attempt to deny his illness or

striking

and enduring in those

its

meanings.

patients

Such

who had

most
were
denial
at
attempts

habitually used the defenses

with
their
of
coping
means
a
as
and
rationalization
of verbal denial
of
indicative
these
patterns
that
problems (22). They also demonstrated

administraintravenous
the
following
interview
"denial" could be elicited in an
interview
the
clinical
manifest
in
not
when
were
they
tion of sodium amytal
(23)-*
followdenial
and
explicit
disorientation
of
* This appearance of patterns
with
associated
so
clearly
sodium
is
amytal
ing the administration of
authors
these
by
described
been
has
diffuse cerebral dysfunction, that it
test."
named
"amytal
the
been
has
This
(23).
as a test for such dysfunction

�-5of
denial
between
a
patient's
noted
direct
relationship
a
they
cere—
of
the
of
and
signs
the
electroshock
appearance
therapy
pain following
test)
of
mechanism
the
that
suggested
they
amytal
bral dysfunction (positive

Thus, when

electroshock therapy

may be

the facilitation of patterns of denial by altered

brain function (15).
and
psychophysiological
at
integrating
This hypothesis is an attempt
which
terms
in
View
it
of
the
and
As
operational
in
such,
factors.
logical
have
which
studies
base
our
theoretical
upon
a
has
provided
is stated, it

been elaborated.

�III

PREVIOUS STUDIES:

of
altered
manifestations
studies
investigating
For the past three years,
cerebral function in psychiatric patients, have been in progress at Hillside

Hospital.

In 1952, the application of the amytal

was asseSSed

(2h).

test to psychiatric subjects

Positive responses were found only

in patients

who had had

electroshock therapy or had other indications of organic brain disease.

in order to test the relationship between altered brain
referred
consecutive
patients
electroshock
to
therapy,
and
the
function
response
electroencephalograms,
with
serial
intervals
weekly
at
tested
treatment
were
for
During 1953-195h%

amytal

tests,

simultaneous

tactile

perception%%

tests,

and

tests of recall

function.
A

marked

correlation

was found between improvement

therapy and early, persistent
the electroencephalograms.

following electroshock

and severe changes in both the amytal

If

no such

tests

such changes did not appear, improvement

and

failed

correlations were manifest between improvement

to occur. In contrast,
and tests of recall function or changes in simultaneous tactile tests.

WM
TWenty—four subjects were

tested in this first study, and were classified

improved
markedly
as
psychiatrist
the
supervising
by
independently

ately

improved (6) and unimproved (7)

at the

(ll),

moder-

end of one month post-treatment.

Paralysis
Infantile
for
Foundation
National
from
the
Aided
Fellowship
a
by
*
(Dr. Fink, 1953) and Grant K—927, National Institute of Fental Health,
National Institutes of Health lQSh-Sé.

stimuli
two
simultaneous
tactile
of
the
of
perception
as Previous studies
one
localize
to
or
of
perceive
failure
demonstrated characteristic patterns
of the stimuli in patients with diffuse cerebral dysfunction (25).

�-7Of

the markedly improved patients, every one had at least one positive amytal

reaction during treatment.

Of

the

50

tests

given to

this group,

38 (765) were

positive. In contrast, of the unimproved patients, five of the seven never
showed a

positive result,

positive.

6 (13%) were

and of the

The

LS

tests administered to this

group, only

moderately improved group showed more positive re-

sponses than the unimproved patients, but

fell far short

of the

much improved

group.

In addition, there were consistent changes in language and non-verbal as-

pects of behavior indicating alterations in adaptive mechanisms in the

in interviews not employing amytal. These alterations

improved group, even
were

much

either minimally or only transiently manifest in the

unimproved group and

then only under the influence of sodium amytal.*
Concomitant studies of the electroencephalograms taken on a day pre-

ceding the amytal

first

measured

test indicate

for per~cent time

a similar
31 w wave

relationship.

The 160

records were

(delta) activity, the extent of

burst activity and the amplitude and frequency of the slowest waves present.
They were then placed in a rank serial order. Those falling in the upper third
were

labelled "high abnormality"

abnormality."

ality after

Of

the

and those in the lower

much improved

patients,

one week of treatment; 80%

after

25% showed

third as "low
a high degree abnormp

two weeks and over 90%

after three

In the unimproved patients, however, none had a high degree abnormality
record during the first three weeks and only one had such a record by the fourth

weeks.

week of

treatment.

The

records of the moderately improved patients

fell

between

these two groups.*%
* Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association,
Kay 10, 1955.

** Presented at the joint meeting of the Eastern and Southern Electroencephalographic Societies, Bethesda, September 30, 1955.

�Changes

in

memory and

learning were tested in these subjects by using

the principle of retroactive inhibition.

3-letter originally learned

By

the serial testing of recall of

words following the

interpolated learning of nonsense

syllables, patterns of decrement in learning and recall

were

elicited.

As

a

week
of treatthe
showed
to
third
impairment
the
increasing
up
patients
group,
ment, and a rapid improvement after the cessation of treatment. No relation-

ship, however, could be established between impairment and reSponse to treatment.*
The

responses of these subjects to simultaneous

tactile tests using touch

stimuli were also assessed. While an increasing impairment in the ability to
be
two
demonstrated with increasing
could
and
stimuli
the
localize
identify

treatment, no relation to improvement was noted.
however, and

in anticipation that

more meaningful

The

tests

were extremely gross,

correlation for this index

of altered brain function could be obtained, a study using threshold electrical

stimuli has been undertaken (pg. 10).
As

ent and

result of these studies, it was our conclusion that early, persistsevere changes in both the electroencephalogram and in the amytal tests

a

are a necessary, though not sufficient pre—requisite for improvement following
electroshock therapy. These observations make it possible to predict the short
term response to electroshock, and such a study was undertaken

earlier this

year (pg.ll).
Concomitant with these studies,

we

have made some preliminary observations

in patients undergoing insulin coma therapy. Recent reports of the value of
prolonged coma as the basis for improvement (26) have been confirmed in our
patients. In

one unusual case

report

we

noted a direct relationship between

* Presented before the Electroshock Research Association,1;ay 8, 1955 and
awarded

their

Annual Prize award

for excellence in research design.

�altered brain function, altered patterns of adaptation in language and behavior,

clinical

and

improvement (27).

Concurrent with these psychologic investigations, basic studies have been
done

in

in biochemistry.

1950* with an

The

initial

biochemical research laboratory was established

program of study of the

relationship between steroid

excretion patterns and states of mental illness.

studies, utilizing alumina column chromatography, demonstrated atypical
The
number
excretion
of
a
levels
in
psychotic
ketosteroid
patients.
urinary
The

of B—steroids (particularly dehydroisoandrosterone) was found to be elevated,
and the etiocholanolone was depressed (7a). The ll-ketoetiocholanolone
values appeared to be sex-dependent: male patients excreted the steroid

metabolite in normal amounts, while the several female patients studied had
markedly elevated values.
During the past year, a collaborative study was

chemical department of the Sloan-Lettering

initiated with the

Institute of

new York.

bio~

Similar

steroid excretion pattern studies were undertaken utilizing paper chromatographic technics.

In the

first

phase of the study recently completed, the

elevated excretion of ll-ketoetiocholanolone was confirmed, with a severe

reduction in the excretion of this
when

compound

prior to discharge, at a time

the patient had shown considerable improvement from her

* Supported by grants from the Dazian Foundation

illness.

for Hedical Research.

�.10...
IV. §EUDIES IN PROGRESS

1.

Relation 2f

AND

Tests

IN DEVEILEEENT:

Improvement:
Function
Brain
33
Altered
3;

altered
between
relationship
direct
Our earlier studies
this
that
however,
apparent,
is
treatment.
It
to
and
function
response
brain
and
not
only
function
brain
altered
of
indices
certain
holds
for
relationship
and
elabconfirm
to
undertaken
been
has
for others. Further study, therefore,
have shown a

methods of measuring

orate these findings, as well as to investigate
improvement.
clinical
to
related
function which are more reliably

a.

cerebral

Amytal Test and Electroencephalogram:
Amytal

tests

and electroencephalograms are done

and
second
the
and
during
subjects before,

third

in all

weeks of electroshock treat—

make
a
used
predicto
data
is
the
findings
ment. On the basis of our earlier
those
that
predicted
is
treatment.
It
to
term
short
response
the
of
tion
and
with
positive
abnormality
electroencephalographic
patients with a high degree

amytal

test findings will

be most

likely to

show improvement;

while those with

amytal
and
with
negative
abnormality
a low degree electroencephalographic

results are considered unlikely to improve.
b. Tactile Perceptual Tests:
perceptual
tactile
simultaneous
the
As described before,
was
planned
inconclusive.
It
were
of
test results in our first series patients
conditions
under
stimulation,
electrical
to repeat this study using threshold
terms
Under
controlled.
be
could
rigidly
wherein the various stimulus parameters
two
of
consisting
assembly
instrument
(M—927)
an
USPHS
grant
of an existing

dewhich
can
devised
was
oscillograph
monitored
by
an
Grass Sh-B stimulators
the
assembly,
this
Using
stimuli.
electrical
wave
independent
square
liver

stimuli applied simul-

to
perceive
their
ability
for
tested
patients are
technique
refined
this
By
applying
body.
taneously to different parts of the
two

�.11be
may
otherwise
not
apparent
function
brain
in
it is anticipated that changes
and
of
improvement
the
be
to
degree
compared
will
observations
These
elicited.

to our other test~results.

As

in the case of the electroencephalogram and

the
and
intervals
during
stated
before
at
tested
are
amytal tests, patients
course of treatment.

c.

Hemory

Tests:
imp
and
loss
of
memory
of
relation
the
Numerous theories

provement have been described.

Our own

data to date

shows no

significant re-

and
words
and
simple
nonsense
syllables
for
lationship
forselective
a
there
is
evidence
that
considerable
But
there
is
improvement.
For
memories.
and
situations
of
life
significant
getting, during treatment,
between the memory loss

a record

this purpose,
may be

is

made

of events during the preceding six months which

of emotional significance to the patient. During treatment, inquiries

records
verbatim
of
these
events,
recollection
patient's
are
and these compared to the pre-treatment reports.
made

of the

2. Relation gf’Premorbid Personality

to Duration 3;

made,

Response:

has also been apparent that the relationship between altered

It

brain function and clinical response is valid only for the short term response
When
six
followed
a
for
treatment.
weeks
several
after
to treatment, ite.,

return
a
had
showing
relapsed,
the
of
improved
several
patients
period,
of their former symptoms, and in some instances requiring further hospital-

month

ization.
thesis

To

account for the varying duration of

was advanced

that the difference

personality patterns. Specifically,

it

was

clinical response, the

hypo-

related to differences in premorbid

was suggested

that patients

who showed

would
(22)
denial
verbal
personality"
the
of
"explicit
the characteristics

likely to maintain improvement.
premorbid personality of each patient is assessed

be those more
The

an interview with family members, psychologic
and

psychiatric interviews.

by

four procedures

tests, tachistoscopic tests

-

�a. Family Interviews:
At least two close relatives are seen in independent
interviews. A standardized questionnaire has been devised to elicit characterological factors indicative of the "explicit verbal denial" personality. For
this study fifteen characteristics defined as typically present or absent in
conscious—
Such
include
items
prestige
selected.
were
of
this type
personality

and
and
to
sex
attitudes
temper
to
imagination,
criticism,
ness, sensitivity
illness. Each patient is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 for each item - the higher

score signifying a greater tendency to denial.

b. Psychologic Tests:
Each

patient is tested

on a

standard psychologic eval-

uation battery including the Rorschach and Thematic Apperception TEStS. These
adap—
defense
of
and
usual
or
types
structure
character
assessed
for
tests are

tation.

Such

tests are repeated at the termination of the treatment

program and

again prior to discharge, to obtain additional information as to changes in
behavior in the course of treatment.
-

c. Tachistoscopic Tests:

tachistoscopic study has been devised; in which pairs
of emotional and non-emotional words are flashed on a screen at 10, 20, 50,
100, and 250 millisecond periods. The patient's ability to identify the words,
A

the reaction time, and the distortions are ascertained. This pre-treatment

data is

now

being explored as to

defense patterns.

The

its ability

to clarify the patient's usual

tests are repeated at the

end of greatment and again

prior to discharge for the possibility that characteristic changes in perception
develop with altered modes of adaptation..

�-13..

d. Psychiatric Interviews:
In the course of estimating changes in behavior, patients
are seen prior to treatment, and at intervals during treatment. In a clinical
interview setting, an assessment is made of the patient's symptoms, and usual
of adaptation. Changes in symptoms, behavior, language and modes of adap-

modes

tation are noted.

By

interviews with the patient's therapist, judgment as to

the significance of such changes and

bral states can
ment

their relation to treatment, or altered cere-

be made.

On

the basis of the data in a-d above a prediction of response to

is

made.

treat-

Prior to the start of treatment the patients are classified as:

1) those unlikely to improve;
2)

those likely to improve moderately or temporarily;

3)

those likely to maintain marked and sustained improvement (for at least

six months).
During the

third

week of

treatment, (after the patients have had

ments), a second prediction of the short term response
change

is

made

7—9

treat-

according to the

in the physiological indices.

3. Altered Patterns g£.Adaptation Kanifested in‘Verbal and NonéVerbal
Behavior:

In the earlier study on the amytal test

it

had been noted

that

specific changes in language and behavior indicative of altered adaptive responses occurred in the improved patients to a significantly greater degree than

in the unimproved patients. Further experimental procedures were
necessary to clarify the nature and significance of these changes.

deemed

�alb-

a.

The

is

a highly structured interview

of the patterns of language.

made

ients

who show

language

will

in émytgl Tests:
amytal test procedure is recorded. This

Language Changes Induced

situation,
The

and systematic observations are

hypothesis tested

is that those pat-

consistent, increasing use of the following types of adaptive

be more

likely

improve:
1) The use of the second or
to

third

person. In such instances the patient reports his main trouble as "the Doctors
say I'm depressed", or state the wish that "my family should be well." 2) The

selective response to questions, as answering readily questions about date and
location but failing to answer,

illness.
tive

mumbling or using neologisms when asked about

3) The use of conditional or qualifying expressions, or the subjunc-

mood which has

the effect of vitiating the patientis committment to the

is

I feel kind of dBpressed", in w hich
"sometimes" qualifies the temporal degree of illness, and "feel" and "kind of"

statement.

An example

"sometimes

‘qualify the intensity of the illness. Committment would be indicated by
the direct, unconditional statement of "I

am

depressed". h)

or stereotyped expressions in discussing illness, as "to
or "well, in a manner of speaking..." or "I didn't keep

wheel". 5) Language

antic statements. 6)
problems.

tell

my

The use

of cliches

you the

shoulder to the

filled with nonpsequiturs, circumlocution, ornate
The use

or pedp

of humor when talking about their illness or other

7) The use of metonymy or paraphasia, as

Dr. as a "recorder". 8 )The various forms of

ulation about the main problem

truth..."

referring to the examining

explicit denial including confab-

and temporal displacement.

9) changing the sym-

bolic frame of reference in response to questions, as replying to the question,

feel?", by stating, "with my hands." 10) The use of hyperbole, as
"you're the best Dr. in the whole eastern Atlantic seaboard area."
"how do you

�.15-

State:
Confusional
the
PostaShock
b. Language Changes in
Each

orientation
for
tested
is
patient

and awareness of

treatment.
a
following
immediately
awakening
of
the
period
in
his main problem
such
At
intervals.
weekly
and
then
at
treatment
the
initial
done after
@his

is

most severe, and a

defects
are
cerebral
neurologic
the
times,
These
of
language
appear.
tive changes in the pattern

variety of

may be comparable

adap—

to the

records
are
and
the
situations,
interview
other
the
in
noted
changes
language
and
changes
language
the
later
to
both
as
indications
assessed for prognostic
the degree of improvement.
Study:
Sentence
Completion
0.
in
language
in
and
changes
A way of studying the patterns

technique.
completion
sentence
a
devised
using
been
has
fashion
a quantitative
accordstructured
been
have
which
complete,
to
sentences
to
given
The patient is
the
in
first
been
have
put
sentences
the
of
Ten
different
patterns.
ing to four
when....",
criticized
am
"I
Wish that......",
such
"I
as
unconditional,
person,
the
in
expressed
are
they
that
except
meaning
in
identical
Ten others are

etc.

sometimes
"people
as
aspect,
qualifying
or
conditional
third person and with a
the
In
reetc.
When.....,"
criticized
wish that.....", "people are usually
these
of
senten
In
indicated.
maining twenty items no person is specifically
or
occurrence
exact
an
to
refers
or
direct
is
sentence
the
tences, however,

event as "every

time....",

”when the

doctor

comes

in.....",

etc.

The remainp

"at
times....",
as
aspect,
indefinite
or
qualifying
conditional,
have
a
ten
ing
etc.
when.....",
better
"things usually seem a little
for
analyzed
not
in
sentences
The response of patients to the incomplete
rated
is
each
response
Instead,
manner.
psychologic
content in the traditional

�16

the
whether
include
ratings
for its grammatical or syntactical structure.
or
conditional,
direct
or
is
second
third
person,
or
response is in the first,
The

1h).
(page
above
described
of
language
manifests aspects
1)
assumptions:
following
the
on
This study is based
begins in

the
to
most
obviously
applicable
a manner

A

sentence which

patient (e.g.,

first

person,

adaptive
reto
elicit
likely
unconditional) creates
conditional
is
or
the
third
in
person
A sentence which is expressed
2)
sponses.
and
least
minimal
is
stress
creates
is less applicable to the patient. It
complete
used
to
The
3)
person
syntactical
likely to elicit adaptive responses.
maximum

stress

and

is

most

of
indicative
is
to
person
in
regard
indeterminate
is
whose
beginning
sentence
a
shows
less
of
the
person
first
the
use
the degree of stress experienced (e.g.,

third
second
or
the
of
the
use
defensiveness,

person shows

greater defensive—

ness).
d. Attitude Interviews:
In

this

part of the study an attempt

the
of
mechanisms
ego.
adaptive
the
tionally

Two

is

made

to define

opera—

structured interviews

followed. The attitude of the

questionnaire is
interone
In
next.
the
to
interview
from
one
examiner, however, is reversed
and
the
in
concerned,
view the examiner is empathetic, pessimistic,
minimize
to
and
tends
insensitive
non-empathetic,
he
brusque,
is
other interview
are held, in which the

the patient's

same

difficulties.

In general, the

first attitude

produces good

a
in
grossly
results
latter
the
while
rapport with these disturbed patients,
each
asked
in
are
non-communicative situation. Although the same questions

to be appropriate to the examiner‘s

attitude.

interview, the wording is altered
"YOu
must
today?",
poorly
"feeling
as
such
he
questions
asks
In one interview
worse?.“
been
getting
"has
and
it
consider your condition pretty serious?",
don't
"you
today?",
well
While in another interview he asks, "feeling pretty
consider your condition serious,

do you?" and "have you been improving?".

�.11.:

The two structured.interviews are performed

just prior to electroshock

interviews
All
are
treatment.
of
treatment and repeated following the course
of
the
patient's
1)
alteration
the
study:
in
recorded. There are two variables
The
four
attitude.
examiner's
the
in
behavior by treatment, and 2) alteration
recordings are studied for

and
changes.
language
vocal
changes,
content,

The

it
defensive mechanisms of the patient
both
out
be
carried
can
that
transactions
of
the
of
terms
range
in
ationally,
and any changes

in

can be defined, oper-

be
commmay
patient
depressed
For
a
example,
very
treatment.
and
after
before
he
whereas
interview,
empathetic
concerned,
the
in
treatment
before
unicative
jovial,
mood
is
the
when
latter
examiner's
the
in
will be unable to participate

of
one
is
treatment
to
his
response
However,
if
and
minimizing.
bantering
becomes
he
sustreatment
Following
reversed.
be
euphoria, the situation may
and
empathetic,
concerned
examiner
is
when
the
anxious
or
hostile,
picious,
Thus
the
interview.
the
optimistic
in
stressful
less
communication
is
whereas
terms,
objective
in
be
stated
the defensive system of the patient can
change

i.e.,

in

of
interpersonal
standardized
range
to
a
in terms of his reactions

uations.

in

sit-

M

h. Clinical Ratings 2: "Improvement":
changes
evaluating
of
methods
and
test
These various experimental
ratthe
psychiatric
in
significance
further
have
may
and
behavior
language

considerable
experienced
we
studies
revious
In
our
:
rovement."
"im
of
P
ing
Or,
be
guide?
the
to
relief
symptomatic
Is
our
patients.
difficulty in rating
to
recovery
Is
be
the
goal?.
to
improvement"
"social
recovery"
or
is a "social

relief?

Agreement by

symptomatic
well
as
as
of
insight
be judged by the degree
"unimproved"
and
improved"
"much
"recovered",
of
definition
the
in

psychiatrists
is not available,

investigations,
to
further
crucial
is
issue
and yet, this

We

�they
terms
as
these
of
assessing
task
further
the
undertaken
have therefore
apply to the electroshock population.
of
incapacity
and
type
the
degree
are
Central to this problem of evaluation
and
the
the
of
therapist,
the
goal
personality,
of the patient, his premorbid
capacity
events,
intercurrent
as
Other
aspects,
therapy.
to
attitudes
patient's
environmental
the
patient's
of
therapy,
suitability
of the therapist, temporal
present.
at
encompassed
not
but
are
assessment,
to
important
also
assets are
To

are
studies
evaluation
following
the
"improvement",
of
meaning
clarify the

in progress.
Evaluation:
Pre-treatment
a.
the
by
therapy
electroshock
Patients are referred for
and

resident therapist.

supervising psychiatrist
evaluation is made by the research psychiatrist.

An
Two

independent psychiatric

aspects are specifically

decompensation
of
signs
clinical
encompassed in this study:
of
sympdegree
for
and
rated
mental
status
descriptive
a
recorded
in
which are
of
the
patient‘s
estimate
2)
an
(28);
scale
tomatology on a Kalamrd rating
1) the symptoms and

operations.
defensive
usual
his
of
with
description
a
develOpment
of
ego
level
Relationship:
Therapist—Patient
the
in
Changes
b.
to
held
prior
therapist
resident
the
with
interviews
In
and
the
therapist
between
relationship
the
therapy,
electroshock
of
the onset
recomp
the
for
the
reason
on
emphasis
with
specific
explored
the patient are
and
the
patient's
treatment,
the
of
the
goals
mendation for this form of therapy,
mental
of
treatment
of
method
Since the primary

attitude to the treatment.
electroshock
for
recommendation
the
disorders at this hospital is psychotherapy,
the
between
patient
communication
that
assumption
the
with
carries
it
generally
deis
the
exploration
For
this
reason,
meaningful.
no
longer
was
and therapist
and
recommendation,
the
led
to
that
relationship
the
in
voted to those changes

�19

and
symptoms that it is
behavior
of
of
those
aspects
statement
a definitive
We
the
in
interested
also
therapist's
affect.
treatment
are
may
the
anticipated

attitude to this
may

form of treatment, and attempt to assess the

role this attitude

play in the eventual results.

of
the
the
results
theories
relating
numerous
there
are
Furthermore,
made
being
are
attempts
and
in
our
inquiries,
therapy to its punitive aspects,

to assess the significance of this factor in the outcome. During the interviews with the resident therapist and with the patient, the patient's attitude
behavior)
and
against
(both
language
defensive
operations
to the treatment, his
his
in
and
alterations
the
electroshock
represents,
the reality threat that

attitude

during the weeks of treatment are

studied. Further information regard—

of
our
the
in
course
be
ascertained
will
of
factor
this
ing the significance

control study (page 21).

c.

Follow—up Study:

Crucial to the evaluation of "improvement" is the

oppor—

treatment
of
the
period
following
various
periods
tunity to repeat evaluations at
from
hosthis
discharged
of
the
patients
follow—up
report
Recently, a four-year
between
customary
the
disparity
indicated
and
(1)
this
pital was made available
of
inthis
the
In
course
illness.
discharge ratings
at
out
carried
being
observers
is
same
the
vestigation, repeat evaluations by
As
check
a
treatment.
months
after
and
six
various times during hospitalization
and eventual course of the

and
the
physiological
of
the
personality
basis
the
on the predictions
two—week
the
for
recorded
factors studied, specific follow—up evaluations are
(long-term
months
period
and
the
result)
six
post-treatment period (short-term
made on

ther—
the
resident
of
the
to
ratings
result). These evaluations are compared
each
In
instance,
medical
director.
and
the
apist, supervising psychiatrist

and
the
of
terms
projected
formulated
in
the ratings made in this study are
and
interpersonal
language
of
behavior,
those
noted
aspects
in
actual changes

�Excretion
23 Improvement:
5. Relation of Steroid
and
their
reof
steroids
excretion
patterns
of
The studies of the
More
recently
continuing.
is
9,
on
described
page
mental
to
states,
lation
of
measurement
the
for
of
techniques
development
the
on
been
has
emphasis
colorimetric
and
*
new
separative
steroid conjugates. During the past year

sulfate
steroid
measure
to
(29)
devised
techniques have been
these
for
patterns
excretion
blood and urine. Daily urinary

compounds

in

compounds

are

and
prior
again
electroshock
of
the
course
assayed prior to treatment, during
resolve
to
is
of
this
program
The
object
selected
patients.
in
to discharge

individual
total
the
with
values
these
and
compare
bound
steroids,
the sulfate excretion
hormone
between
relationship
the
elucidating
Besides
hormone levels.
which
to
extent
the
indicate
of mental illness, such studies
and

rates

states

hormones.
steroid
of
metabolism
the
the liver (30) participates in
Electroshock
Therapy:
Results
Functions
of
on
6. Effect of Autonomic
behas
studies,
it
electroencephalographic
of
our
In the course

alterations
the
typical
fail
of
number
patients
that
a
apparent
come
to
also
fail
These
patients
treatment.
extensive
in cerebral rhythms despite
and
frequently
tactile
tests,
in the amytal tests, simultaneous
to

show

show changes

reactivity
the
studies,
these
with
Simultaneous
periods.
confusional
evince no
mecholyl
of
administration
the
to
rate
and
the
pulse
blood
of the
pressure
to
done
was
prior
too,
This,
out.
carried
been
have
"Funkenstein—test")
(the
Marked
ended.
had
treatment
of
the
course
after
immediately
treatment and
two
test
these
found
in
were
medication
this
to
variations in the responses
the
of
earlier
the
reports
way
general
a
in
followed
observations
These
periods.
between
relationship
the
of
exploration
the
undertaking
workers, but we are now
tests.
physiological
and
these
function
brain
altered
of
tests
in
the alteration
* Aided by a grant (A-6YSC)
Public Health Service.

States
United
Health,
of
from the National Institutes

�v.

THE PROJECTED PROGRAM: SUMMARY

1.

3

21 -

Method:

the
along
and
development
continuation
The projected program is a
Our
ultimate
of
this
two
report.
sections
lines indicated in the preceding
the
systematic
by
therapy
electroshock
of
mechanism
goal is to clarify the
of
behavioral,
inter-relationship
the
of
and integrated investigation
biochemical
factors.
and
physiological
sonality,
This program

is

per—

rev
interdisciplinary
full-time
a
by
undertaken
being

neurophysiolpgist,
psychoanalyst,
of
psychiatrists,
search staff consisting
help.
technical
and
allied
biochemist
physiologist, experimental psychologist,
Some

in
scope
clear
already
are
the
in
program
of the specific studies

and
new
continues
the
program
as
become
apparent
Others
will
and outline.
Two new basic
develop.
leads
promising
further
or
problems
appear
critical

decided
been
upon.
already
have
methodological aspects

date
work
to
our
in
1. Control group:0ne of the major deficiencies
starting
Accordingly,
control
group.
has been the absence of an adequate
two
into
divided
be
will
electroshock
for
referred
January 1, 1956, patients
of
conusual
course
the
receive
will
One
group
fashion.
random
a
in
groups
treatments.
sub-convulsive
be
given
vulsive therapy; the other group will
Ulett
of
study
instructive
recommendation follows the recently reported
This

et a1. (31).

In other respects the two groups will

be

treated in the

same

will
each
group
in
are
patients
who
will
The
only
person
fashion.
of
The
purpose
treatments.
the
administering
be the supervising psychiatrist
in—
of
the
effects
physiological
the
differentiate
to
is
such a control group
know which

outcome.
therapeutic
the
affecting

Some

duced convulsions from other factors
disease
process,
the
of
particular
1)
nature
the
of these factors might include
2) the

attitude

and symbolic

etc.;
depression,
involutional
or
as schizophrenia
of
a
large
attention
3)
the
special
the
patient;
to
treatment
of
the
meaning

�~22:

numbers of observers

h) the

incident to being placed

on

the treatment program;

attitude of the patient's therapist toward the patient

and toward

electroshock therapy, including the expected goals in each case; and S) the

relative effectiveness of other forms of therapy provided for these patients
in the hospital milieu. The use of a control group will also clarify the
nature of "Spontaneous recovery" and

may

aid in the understanding of

"atypical" results in the patients actually receiving convulsive therapy.
2. Insulin

Coma:

It is

planned to extend the present methods of study

to an investigation of those patients receiving insulin

coma

therapy.

�~23.-

2. Significance
This program of study has both applied and theoretical significance.

there
since
electroshock
of
therapy
use
clinical
It can lead to the improved
be
mechanism.
will
It
the
of
therapeutic
will be a greater understanding
to
who
better
improve,
will
those
patients
more
skillfully
select
to
possible
and
to
predict
the
involved
therapeutic
in
process,
factors
other
manipulate
more

accurately future management problems.
of
the
psychounderstanding
to
a
greater
however,
also
This study
leads,

pathology of mental

picture
which

illness.

Through the various methods of study a

clearer

will be obtained
meaningful criteria for

of the mechanism of defense and modes of communication

may

contribute

more

operationally accurate and

"improvement".
of
determination
the
for
diagnostic classification
techtherapeutic
other
on
throw
light
may
Finally, the investigation
and

and
obserthe
function
cerebral
in
niques. The studies of the alteration
have
signifi—
damage
and
cerebral
behavior
between
vations on the relationship
also
is
It
electrocoagulation.
and
cerebral
cance for the studies in Ibbotomy
modes
of
and
in
language
the
changes
into
here
gained
the
insights
that
likely
of
psychotherapy.
study
eventual
significant
make
an
possible
adaptation may

�VI. FACILITIES

AVAILABLE:

1. Hillside Hespital is a

200 bed

non-profit psychiatric hospital.

All admissions are voluntary, with periods of hospitalization varying from
h-lZ months. All patients are available for study.
The

hospital

was

established in 1927, for the purpose of treating

ulatory psychiatric patients.

A

amb-

residency training program.was instituted

earxy, under the supervision of an active staff of psychoanalytic psychiatrists.
In 1950 the research biochemical laboratory was established, to be followed

in

1953 by

the neurophysiological research laboratory.

In 19Sh these laboratories were combined and expanded, and a Research
Service established as a:full-time operation of the hospital.
Research Director was appointed to integrate
program.

At this time, the

staff consists

all

A

full-time

the studies into a basic

of the Director, research assis—

tants in psychiatry and psychology, biochemist and assistant biochemist,

siologist,

and

EEG

technician. In addition, a psychologist and

phyb

two chemists

are associated on a project basis.
Laboratory
Medcraft D-8,
two S-hB Grass

8

facilities include:

(a) Electroencephalographic unit with a

channel instrument; (b) Neurophysiological laboratory with

stimulators,

tachistoscopic projectors

ical laboratory with

Du Mont # 3&amp;0 R

and

feet of laboratory space

Beckman

Coleman Spectrophotometer, and

ifications of the A.E.C.

two synchronized

auxiliary electronic equipment; (c)

1000 square

the following major items:

oscillograph;

Biochemp

and equipped with

Spectrophotometer,'Warburg respirator,

radioisotope unit following the basic spec-

�£2 5..
ﬂ

2. Personnel:*

studies
Undergraduate
Research:
of
(a) Dr. Max Fink, H.D., Director
the
and
degree
New
Yorn
College
University,
of
Universitv
were undertaken at the
{e
the
attended
l9h2.
in
was
granted
of B.A. cum laude with Honors in Biology
New

l9h5.
in
graduating
of
Hedicine,
York University College

interneship he served in

School
of
the
from
he
where
graduated
U.S.
Army,
the

Military Heuropsychiatry in
Knox

After a rotating

19h7, and was Chief of the

Psychiatric Section, Fort

Station Hospital during 1947.
Formal neurologic

training

was

received at hontefiore Hospital in

York

New

Formal
psychiatric
(l9h9«1951).
Hosoital
Bellevue
Dsychiatric
and
at
(l9h8-l9h9)

and
than
(1950)
at
Hospital
Bellevue
?svchiatric
undertaken
at
training was

Hillside Hoscital (1952).
During 1951, and again

in

1953, he

and then

at

Mount

In 1952, he was
American Board of

first at

Sinai Hospital in

a research fellow of the Hational

Both periods of study were under the

Foundation for Infantile Paralysis.

ection of Ur. horris 3. Bender,

Was

ﬂew York

dir-

University College of ﬂedicine

ﬂew York.

the
by
in
l95h,
and
Psychiatry,
in
Feurology,
in
certified

‘sychiatry and Neurology.

Simultaneously he attended and gradof Psychoanalysis, Psychiatry and

Institute
1953.
In
January,
in
Physicians
for
Psychology, receiving their Certificate
Mental
of
Institute
National
the
of
June, l9Sh, he was granted a research grant

uated from the ”illiam

Alanson Fhite

Health for a 2-vear study of electroshock processes.

In September, l95h, he was

Fink
Dr.
Hillside
Hospital.
Service
at
Research
appointed Director of the

is

33, married and has one son.
_____._.__.___.___________.___.____________.._._____._______._____________.______.
38.
apaended,
page
of
is
personnel
* Bibliography

�7-20Collowing
Psvcuiatry:
in
Assistant
(b) Dr. Joseph Jaffe, h.D.,
the
attended
Jaffe
Dr.
l9hh),
(B.A.,
Columbia
College
at
studies
undergraduate
Then
19b7.
M.D.
in
his
and.was
granted
of
hedicine,
College
New vorlr. University
he
began
interneship,
rotating
a
he was elected to Alpha Omega Alpha. Followinr
resident
a
as
First
Hospital.
DelleVue
Psychiatric
the
at
of
study
three years
U.S.P.H.S.
posta
as
studies
his
he
completed
in psychiatry, then in neurology,
lender.
3.
Morris
Dr.
of
doctoral research fellow under the supervision

from
graduating
Air
Force,
States
United
the
in
he
was
1953,
From 1951, to
Air
Eitchell
the
at
Psychiatrist
Chief
He
was
ﬁedicine.
Aviation
the School of

Force Base Hospital.
prac—
the
private
been
in
has
he
service
Since discharge from the military
of
Board
American
the
by
psychiatry
in
He
certified
was
tice of psychiatry.
psychoin
candidate
been
he
a
has
Since
l9h9,
1953.
in
and
Neurology
Psychiatry
Psychiatry
Psychoanalysis,
of
Institute
'hite
Alanson
analysis at the William
the
at
Assistant
Research
been
has
a
two
years
the
and
past
for
and Psychology
in
position
present
to
his
He
was appointed
Mount Sinai Hospital of New York.

September, 1955.
Chemist:
Chief
Ph.D.,
Goldenberg,
(0) Dr. Harry

A

graduate of the

Tremaine
of
a
recipient
York
New
in
of
the
City
of
College
D.
in
”h.
his
received
Goldenberg
Dr.
Scholarship and graduated cum laude.
in
instructor
He
been
has
an
Brooklyn.
of
Institute
from
‘olytechnic
the
l9h9

l9hh, he was the

College
Brooklyn
and
at
(l9h6-h7)
biochemistry at the Dolytechnic Institute
Natthe
of
enzymology
Fellow
in
Research
he
l9h7~h9
was
a
In
(1951 to date).

ional Institute

of Health, and from 1950

the
to
chemist
he
was
a
1952,
to

methods
enzyme
studying
of
Brooklyn
Hospital
Jewish
the
at
U.S.D.H.S. project

in clinical chemistry.

�...27..

Dr. Robert L. Iahn, Ph.D., Assistant in Psychology:

(d)

After

graduation from Brooklyn College in l9h0, he undertook graduate studies at
Columbia University. These studies were interrupted by four years of service
and
School
Dsyc‘hology
went
he
Clinical
to
where
United
Army,
States
in the
On
and
overseas.
country
in
this
various
hospitals
served as psychologist in
of
Neurology
the
Department
in
Research
T’syc‘iologist
became
he
the
army
leaving

of the

Mount

of Dr.

horris

Sinai Hospital in

New

York, where he wormed under the supervision

B. Bender and Dr. E. A.

"einstein until January, 1955.

is

He

of
monograph,
the
and
co-author
is
studies,
experimental
of
numerous
the author
"Denial of Illness:
He

Symbolic and Physiological Aspects" published

received his Ph.D. from the

New

in

May, 1955.

York University School of Graduate Arts

instructor of psychology at Brooklyn and Huntto
been
he
a.consultant
has
two
two
For
the
past
fbr
years
years.
er Colleges
conducted
and
has
training proMental
of
Hygiene
New
York
Department
State
the

and Sciences in 1953, and

was an

he
been
has
1955,
a
Since
January,
mental
the
of
several
hospitals.
in
grams
member

of this

staff.

(e) Dr.

Hyman

years of military service,
received his 3.8. in
ogy

interns at

York

four
Following
Psychology:
in
Assistant
Ph.D.,
Korin,
he matriculated

l9h9, and

at College of the City of

his H.S. in 1950. During 1951-52 he

the Hount Sinai Hospital and

University.

New

was

York and

psychol-

matriculated for his Ph.D. at

New

Since June, 1953, he has been Research Assistant in Psychology

at Hillside Hospital.

He

recently completed his doctoral thesis on

"The

Effects

of ﬁlectroshock on Retroactive Inhibition," and received his Ph.D. in October,
1955.

his'L.

F.

(f) Dr. Arnold Blumberg, H.D., Internist: Dr. Blumberg received
from the University of Pennsylvania in l9h2, for studies in physiology,

and in l9h5, received his E.D. from

the

Mew

York

University College of Medicine.

continued
he
two
of
and
service,
military
years
interneship
Following a rotating
1952.
l9h8
First
from
to
Memorial
Goldwater
Hospital
at
his residency training

�-28he
completed
Fellow
Medicine,
in
then
a
as
as a resident in neuropsychiatry,
He
has
1950-1952.
Division
Research
the
his studies as a Research Fellow in

been a Fellow in

Medicine

at the

New York

University College of Medicine,

1951-Sh.
He was

is

an

certified

Internal Medicine in l95h and
of Physicians. He is the associate

by the American Board of

associate of the American

Attending Internist at Hillside

Academy

Hospital and has'been

directly responsible fa'

of
coordinator
well
as
as
Research
Service,
the physiological studies of the
the biochemical programs.
3. Function of Research Service:

the
Research
Service,
the
of
research
programs
In addition to the
with
actively
They
cooperate
functions.
staff is active in two additional
research
who
on
part-time
carrying
are
those members of the hospital staff
In such instances, aid

nature.
of
clinical
a
chiefly
projects,
the
planning
of
goals,
project
clarification
the

is given in

and design of programs, and

is needed.
and
during
in
is
progress,
program
Secondly, an active resident training
independon
an
to
opportunity
carry
an
given
is
the third year, each resident
been
have
two
service
projects
of
this
ent project. Since the development
such technical assistance as

the
include
projects
completed, and three are
testosterone
of
and
the
use
states
anxiety
in
of
reserpine
clinical evaluation
include
resident
At
projects
present,
coma
therapy.
insulin
to
adjuvant
an
as
now

active.

The completed

a
factor,
therapeutic
milieu
a
as
the
of
hospital
a study

clinical evaluation

and
clinical,
coma
therapy
insulin
for
substitute
a
of chlorpromazine as
aMbivalence.
of
measures
and
tachistoscopic
psychologic

�-29In

May, 1955,

the Research Service established

a.

liason with the Sloan-

York
of
steroid
New
out
study
to
cooperative
a
of
Institute
carry
Kettering
excretion rates in psychotic patients, with emphasis on the patterns altered

during and following electroshock thefapy.

�-30..

VII,

M

PRESENT BUDGET AND REQUESTED SUPYOR :

Budget and Present Support:
1. Present anus—“u
The following is the full budget of the Research Service

for the fiscal year l9SSmS6. The major Share of the program is supported
by the Board of Directors, supplemented by grants of the United States Public Health Service. Under Grant M—927 of the National Institute of Mental
Health, $1h,807 of direct costs and $2221 of overhead costs was granted

for the year September 1, 1955 to August 31, 1956. This grant is the second
year of a 2-year grant for neurophysiological studies including the present
Electroshock Evaluation Study.
awarded $6500

The

National Institute of Arthritis has

for the second year of a twoayear grant for biochemical studies.

�~31-

1.

w.-

'

Board of Directors

U.S.P.H.S.

15,000‘

15,000

-——-

Psychiatry*

7,200

7,200

--—

Research Assistant in
Psychology

8,000

-——-—

8,000

Research Assistant in
Psychology

5,000

-—-—-

5,000

2,520

2,520

-————

Chief Chemist

8,600

8,600

-—-—-

Assistant

Chemist

h,000

__—-

h,000

Assistant Chemist

2,800

2,800

-——-

Assistant in Chemistry

1,800

-——-

1,800

h50

-—-—

h50

3,810

2,253

1,557

1,200

1,000

200

Personnel

Director of Research

Psychiatgz:
Research Assistant in

7E0 Technician

-

Secretary

Biochemistgz:

2.

Equipment

3. Consumable supplies

h. Travel - Conferences
Total
Overhead
TOTAL

* 3/5 time to September 1956.

60,380

39,373

21,007

2,521

______

2,521

62,901

39,373

23,528

�.32..

2. Requestegjg‘udgetagr Support:
A.

include

requirements of the Electroshock Therapy Evaluation Project

The

two

two
of
other
modification
the
to
professional staff,
additions

specific allocations of equipment funds.
(1) Psychiatrist: The cooperation of an additional full time psycoma
insulin
include
of
to
the
study
the
needed
to enlarge
scope
chiatrist is

positions,

and

of
evaluations
the
in
to
assist
control
the
study;
therapy; to supervise
diange in patients

and carry out follow-up

studies.

For

this position, an-

alytic experience is essential.
(2)

Physiologist or Heurophysiologist:

Present physiological studies

of
Further
physiostudy
and
the
Internist.
Director
the
out
by
carried
are
by
full-time
a
of
studies
these
coordination
the
changes
requires
logical

physiologist,
(3)

M.D.

or Ph.D.

Equipment:

and physiology.

For

Present needs are focused in two areas

-

biochemistry

further refined studies of the steroid sulfate patterns

mechanical
and
a
Beckman.Spectrophotometer
the
attachment
for
a recording

carry out the anticipated physiological
studies modifications and attachments to the electroencephalograph are

shaker (Dubnoff) are requested.

To

suggested.
following budget is one suggested to continue the present proneeded
completo
the
of
1956
personnel
addition
the
with
July
1,
gnmn after
ment the present staff. The budget is divided into three categories, followB.

The

Research
Serthe
coordinated
in
which
divisions
are
the
three
laboratory
ing
and
five
period,
a
for
the
for
year
Estimates
listed
first
year,
are
vice.

including projected salary increments.

�M

First

1. Psvchiatqz:

a. Director
Secretary

Conferences

13

Year

Five Year Total

(20,-25,000)

20,000

112,500

(2,6-3,100)

2,600
1,200

11,220

(15,-18,000)
(15,-18,000)

15,000
15,000
9,000
5,500

82,500
82,500
52,500
35,000

1,200

3,600

. Personnel

1. Psychiatrist
2. Psychiatrist
3. Eeychologist
13.. Psychologist

c. Supplies
Subtotal

-

&amp;

(

9"12:OOO)

(5’5' 8,500)

Equipment

388,820

69,500

Psychiatry

2. Neurophysiologx:

a. Personnel
9,000
3,600

52,500
12,000

b. Equipment

1,000

1,000

c. Supplies

1,200

6,000

1. Physiologist
2. Technician

(9,-12,000)

(3 : 641-31400)

71,500

10,800

Subtotal - Neurophysiology
3. Biochemistry:

a. Personnel
Chief Chemist (9,-11,000)

9,000
6,000
0,000
1,800

36,000
25,000
11,200

b . Equipment

7,000

7,000

0. Supplies

1,500

7,500

1.
2.
3.
h.

Chemist
Chemist

issistant

Subtotal - Biochemistry

(6,-8,h00)

(bu-6,000)

(1,8—2,600)

29,300

137,700

�Total

First

-

All Programs

..

All Programs

113,600

598,020

17,0h0

89,700

130,6h0

687,720

Overhead Allowance\(15%)

TOTAL

Five Year Total

Year

C. Budget Reconciliation:

1. Salaries:

The

salary range for each item is consistent with pre-

sent positions established at the hospital, or for

new

positions, with neighbor-

for supervising psychiatrists is
$12,-15,000, with a projected revision to the stated scale in 1956.
ing

institutions. Present salary
2. Equipment:

ment expenditure

ance

range

For psychiatry, the

initial year

includes the equip-

for tape recording system (#600) and an annual

for expenses.

The

$600 allow—

physiological equipment expense (51000) is to allow

modification of present electroencephalographic equipment to
record other physiological indices.

The

expenditure for supplies includes

allowances for consumable items and the provision for the building of specialIized equipment.

In biochemistry, the

a recording attachment for the

Beckman

intiial

expenditure includes $7,200 for

spectrophotometer and 9800 for a Dubnoff

shaker.
3. Conferences:

Present budgetary items include this

of the Director or members of the

sum

for the use

staff to attend appropriate scientific

meet-

ings.
h. Overhead: Consistent with hospital policy and recent administrative
changes in other

grants, a

15%

allowance

is requested.

This amount includes

hospital allocations for Social Security coverage; and for such contingencies
in the expenses of the program as not reg iring a significant alteration in the
budget.

5. Subtotals and Total: The budget is presented in three sections,
representing natural subdivisions of the program, thereby allowing for modifications in support.

�VII.

APPENDIX

A. REFERENCES:

from
Discharged
317
Patients
of
Study
Follow-up
H.L.
RACHLIN,
2E.§i:
1.
in
Hosp.,
Hillside
press.
l?50,
J.
in
Hillside Hospital
and
other
Psychosurgery
Shock
Treatment,
2. KALINOWSKY, L.B. and HOCH, P.H.:
New
York,
Grune
Stratton,
(2nd
a
ed.),
Somatic Treatment in Psychiatry

1952.

19h8.
397,
Mil.
Surg.
$92:
Theories,
Shock
Therapy
Fifth
GORDON,
H.L.:
3.
and
Dsvchiatry,
Neurology
of
Foundations
h. GELLHORN, E.' Physiological
1953.
Minneopblis,
Hinnesota
Press,
University of
Nervous
Autonomic
H.C.:
S.a FNNKENSTEIN, D.H.,
Ment.
3
Nerv.
J.
Shock
Treatment,
System Changes Following Electric
GREENBLATT, M.

Dis.

329%.: 2109,

and

SOLOMON,

19,480

Which
PreA
Test
H.C.:
5.b FUNKENSTEIN, D.H., GREENBLATT, M.,
Schizophrenic
on
Treatment
Shock
Electric
of
dicts the Clinical Effects
1950.
889,
Am.
199:
Psychiat.
J.
Patients,
AND SOLOMON,

5.0.

Autonomic
Changes
H.C.:
SOLOMON,
and
M.,
FUNKENSTEIN, D.H.,
&amp;
Nerv.
J.
Patients,
in
Mentally
Changes
Psychologic
Paralleling
GREENBLATT,

Ment. Dis.

6.a.

11;: 1, 1951.

Ill

Exthe
and
in
HOAGLAND, H. et al: Changes in the Electroencephalogram
of
AgitTherapy
Electro-shock
Accompanying
cretion of T7-Ketosteroids
19h6.
Med.
§32h6,
Psychosom.
ated Depression,

Excretion
on
Treatment
of
Effect
B.H.:
6.b. ALTSCHULE, N.D. and
&amp;
Neurol.
Arch.
Mental
Disease,
with
Patients
in
of l7-Ketosteroids
1950.
516,
éﬁ:
Psychiat.
Cortins
of
Excretion
the
on
Convulsive
Therapy
6.c. ASHBY,‘W. 1.: Effects of
19h9.
275,
Ment.
Sci.
23:
and Ketosteroids, J.
PARKHURST,

Excretl7-Ketosteroid
the
of
Studies
Chromatographic
H.
WERBIN,
7.a.
gt El:
Hosp.,
Hillside
Normal
J.
Individuals,
and
ion Datterns of Psychotic
195,40
2011,
2:
l7~
Neutral
of
Urinary
The
Fractionation
S.
R.:
M.
STITCH,
and
REISS,
7.b.
Ment.
$99:
Sci.,
J.
Male
Schizophrenics,
Chronic
from
Ketosteroids
7011, 195,40

8.

ASHBY, W.

R.:

Mode

22: 202, 1952.

of Action of Electro-Convulsive Therapy,

J.

Ment. Sci.

�.36...

9.

Shock
Therapy,
Hypoglycemic
and
JELLIFFE, S. E.: Discussion on Insulin
1937.
200,
&amp;
2Q:
Psychiat.
Arch. Neurol.

of
Aspects
Psychologic
Certain
0n
E.
MOSSE,
9.:
and
J.A.B.
10. MILLETT,
l9hh.
226,
Med.
6:
Electroshock Therapy, Psychosom.
Shock
Electric
with
Treated
Patients
in
Functioning
Memory
ZUBIN,
J.:
lla.
l9h8.
33,
Dersonality
Therapy, J.
ll:
on
Therapy
Convulsive
Electric
of
Effect
S.E.:
BARRERA,
and
ZUBIN,
11b.
J.,
596,
l9hl.
ﬁg:
Biol.
Soc.
Exper.
Hemory, Proc.
Assoword
the
on
Performance
on
Shock
Therapy
of
:
Effects
ZEAEAN,
J.
12,
19h7.
Association,
Psychological
Eastern
the
at
Presented
ciation Test.
J.
Treatments,
Convulsive
Electric
Following
Loss
Memory
JANIS,
I.L.:
13.
191.18.

Personality

1.1: 29,

der
mit
Erfabrungen
Psychopathologische
GROBE,’W.:
and
W.
BAEYER,
von,
lha.
l9h7.
163,
Psychiat.
$12:
Elektrokrampfmethode, Arch. f.
after
Patients
Mental
on
Observations
E.
STAINBROOK,
J.:
H.
and
LOWENBACH,
lhbg
l9h2.
828,
Am.
2g:
Psychiat.
J.
Electroshock,
Post—Convulsive
of
Immediate
Description
Rorschach
STAINBROOK,
E.J.:
Ibo.
19AM.
302,
&amp;
Personality'lg:
Mental Function, Char.
Electroshock
During
Psychosis
KAHN,
and
R.L.:
LIEN,
L.,
WEIWSTFIN,
E.A.,
15a.
Am.
Psychiat.
J.
Shock
Therapy,
of
the
Theory
to
Relation
Its
Therapy:

1952.
22,
$92:

and
PhysioSymbolic
of
Illness:
Denial
KAI-1H,
R.L.:
15b. mnrsmm, F..A and
1955.
Illinois,
C.
Springfield,
Thomas,
Charles
Aspects,
logical
Ego,
the
on
Treatment
Shock
of
Effects
D.:
IMPASTATO,
and
FROSCH,
J.
16.
Psychoan. Quart. I]; 226, l9h8.

l7.
18.
19.
20.

Recent
Under
"Normal"
Person
of Electroshock on a

L.: Effect
1953.
696,
Am.
J. Psychiat. $92:
Stress,
in
(Paraphasia)
Misnaming
Non—aphasic
UEINSTEIN, E.A. and KAHN, R.L.:
1959.
72,
61:
a
Psychiat.
Neurol.
Arch.
A.M.A.
Brain
Disease,
Organic
Organic
in
Disorientation
of
Patterns
KAHN,
R.L.:
WEINSTEIN, E. A. and
1951.
21h,
&amp;
Neurol.
I:
Brain Disease, J. Neuropath. Clin.
"47.1%.: 7-iithdrawal, Inattention,
310133,
and
mms'mm, E.A., ram-I, R.L.,
1955.
235,
&amp;
IA:
Psychiat.
and Pain Asymbolia, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
ALEXANDER,

�-3721.

T‘JEII‘YST‘EIN,
&amp;

E.

nsychiat.

A.
_6_L_l:

and mm,
772, 1950.

D.

Neurol.
Arch.
Anosognosia,
of
L.: Syndrome
"

of
Denial
Illness,
in
Factors
Personality
R.L.:
MEN,
and
22. IEINSTEIN, E.A.
1953.
§_9_:
355,
&amp;
T.‘Ieurol.
Psychiat.
11.14.11. Arch.
23.

L.A. and LINN,

R.L., SUGABI'JIAN,
Brain
Disease,
Sodium
Organic
in
Amobarbital
of

“IEINS'I'Em, 33.11., MEN,

Am.

Use
Diagnostic
1.:

J. Psychiat.

112:

889, 1953.

21;.

Test"
"Amytal
E.A.:
H.
and
vmmsmm,
KAI-1N, R.L., PINK,
1955.
3,
Hosp.
3:
Hillside
Mental Illness, J.

in Patients with

Differential
the
in
Tests
Perceptual
NJ: Tactile
25a. DEF-HER, MB. and
1952.
21,
Hosp.,
Hillside
1:
J.
Disorders,
Psvchiatric
of
Diagnosis
Sign
8.
Diagnostic
Test
as
Face-Hand
1.1.3.:
25b. PINK, M. GREEN, M. and BINDER,
1952.
h6,
2:
Neurology,
of Organic Mental Syndrome,
ImproveClinical
and
Damage
Brain
26a. REVITCE-I, 13.: Observations on Organic
195h.
§_8_:
72,
Quart.
ment Following Protracted Insulin Coma, Psychiat.
Coma:
TreatInsulin
A
Prolonged
Case
of
M.:
26b. IC-“IALEJASSER, S. and CAPLAN,
1952.
1115,
Hosp.
1:
ment, J. Hillside
and
ClinicElectroencephalographic
26c. SHAGASS, C. and ROFSML, P."T.: Serial
&amp;
Neurol.
A.Z"T.A.
Arch.
Coma,
Insulin
Prolonged
of
Case
al Studies in a
195b,.
705,
Psychiat. 12.:
Posthypoglycemic
in
Studies
26d. TRACER, C.L. at £1: Electroencephalographic
19530
1135,
1.32%:
Dis.
l‘ient.
Coma, Jo NerV.
Parts
of
1-5.:
Reduplication
Delusional
and
N.
FINE,
27. KAHN, R. L., GRAUBTE’ET, D.
1955.
13h,
Hosp.
g:
Hillside
Coma
Therapy, J.
Insulin
After
1Jody
the
of
Scale,
Rating
the
A
Psychiatric
of
Revision
28. MALAI‘EUD, 'T. and SANDS, S.L.:
Am. J. Psychiat. _l_9_l_l: 231, ram.
Colorimetric
Quantitative
the
for
Dyes
Basic
Use
of
29. GOLDENBERG, H.:
Chemical
Society
American
Conjugates,
Sulfate
Estimation of Steroid
1955.
'Iarch
31,
200,
Abstract,
Highspeed
by
Synthesis
Sulfate
Steriod
:
T4..
REIL’IANN,
J.
and
30. GOLDEHBERG,
Chem.
Soc.
in
Am.
press.
J.
,
Liver Supernates,
Convulof
Evaluation
the
in
Matched
Groups
Use
The
of
G.
A.
313
31.:
31. ULE'IT,
195h.
128.:
138,
July,
Menn.
Clin.
Bull.
Photoshock,
Subconvulsive
and
sive
F11 K,

(31‘.

�B.

Publications of Personnel:
Dr.

N

l.

x Fink:

Subdural Hematoma Developing during Hospitalization, Amer. J.
Psychiat., 191: 381-383, 1950 (with Dr. M. Green).

2. Patterns in Perception of Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand,
Trans. Amer. Neurol. Assoc., 22; 250, 1950 (with Drs. M.B. Bender
and

M.

...,

Green).

ibid,

Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat., éé: 355-362, 1951.

Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome,
Neurology, 2: hé-58, 1952 (with Drs. M. B. Bender and M. Green).
The Face-Hand

Tactile Perceptual Tests in the Differential IJiagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders, J. Hillside Hosp., 1; 21—31, 1952 (with Dr. M. B.

Bender).
A

Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Angiography, Conf. Neurol., 13:

Exosomesthesia, or Displacement of Cutaneous Sensation into Extrapersonal Space, Trans. Amer. Neurol. Assoc., lg; 1952 (with Drs.
M. F. Shapiro and M. B. Bender).

....

ibid, Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat., éﬁ: h8l-h90 1952.

9. Order of Dominance in Cutaneous Perception, Trans. Amer. Neurol.
Assoc. 2E3 238~h0, 1952 (with Drs. M.B. Bender and M. Green).
10. Development of Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in
Normal Uhildren, Neurology, 2; 27-3h, 1953 (with Dr. M. B. Bender).
11.

Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli by Mentally Retarded
Adults, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 111; h3-h9, 1953 (with Drs. M. B.
Bender and M. Green).

l2. Spinal Fluid Findings

2: 137, 1953 (I-rit‘n Dr.

13.

Following Cerebral Angiography, Neurology,
M.

Stein).

Statistical

Study of a Psychoanalytic Hypothesis; Absence of a
Parent as a Specific Factor Determining Choice of Neurosis, J.
Hillside Hospital, a; 67-71, 1953 (with Dr. S. Tarachow).

A

Effects of Barbiturates
15: 1953 (with Drs.

on Perception, Trans. Amer.
M. B. Bender, P. Bergman and M.

Neurol. Assoc.,
Nathanson).

Homosexuality with Panic and Paranoid States (Case Report)
Hillside Hosp., _2_: 16h-9o, 1953.

J.

16. Standardization of the Face-Hand Test, Neurology a; 211-217, 195h
(with Dr. M. Green).

�.3917.

Patterns of Perceptual Organization with Simultaneous Stimuli, Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 12: 233-255, 195A (with Drs. M. B. Bender and

H. Green).

18. The Amytal Test in Patients with Mental Illness, J. Hillside Hospital,
g; 3-13, 1955 (with R. L. Kahn and E. A. Heinstein).

l9. Delusional Reduplication of Parts of

Body

After Insulin

Coma

Therapy,

Dr. Joseeh Jaﬁig:

1.

Perceptual Patterns During Recovery From General Anesthesia, Jour. of
Neurol. Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat., 1%; 316-321, 195l (with M. B. Bender).

2.

Factor of Symmetry in Tests of Double Simultaneous Stimulation, Brain,
15: 167-176, 1952 (with M.B. Bender).

Dr. Rdbert Kahn:

1. Toxicity of Quinacrine (atabrine) for Central Nervous System: Experimental
&amp;
Human
Neurol.
Arch.
on
Psychiat., 5g: 28h—299, l9h6
Study
Subjects,
(with Dr. T. Lidz).
2. After-Imagery in Defective Fields of Vision, J. Neurol., Neurosurg. and
Psychiat., lg: 196-20h, l9h9 (with Dr. M. B. Bender).
3. A Hereditary Syndrome Characterized by Mirror Movements, Left Handedness and Organic Mental Defect, Trans. Am. Neurol. A., ZS? 22h—226,
1919 (with Drs. I. Freiman and L. Michaels).
Tumors and Vascular
15: 277-278, 1950 (with

h. Correlation of Clinical and EEG-Abnormalities in
Disease of the Brain, Trans. Am. Neurol. A.,
Drs. E. A. ieinstein and H. Strauss).

5.

Syndrome of Anosognosia, Arch. Neurol.
(with Dr. E. A. Heinstein).

&amp;

Psychiat., ég: 772-791, 1950

6. Patterns of Disorientation in Organic Brain Bisease, J. Neuropath.
Clin. Neurol. 1; 21h-226, 1951 (with Dr. E. A. heinstein)

&amp;

7. Nonaphasic Misnaming (Paraphasia) in Organic Brain Disease, A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., él: 72-79, 1952 (with Dr. E. A. Neinstein).

8. Preoperative and Postoperative Personality Changes Accompanying Frontal
Lobe Heningioma,
B. Schlesinger).

9.

J. Nerv.

&amp;

Hent. Bis.,

llh;

h92-510, 1952 (with Dr.

Phenomena of Reduplication, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.,
81h, 1952 (with Drs. E. A.'Heinstein and L. A. Sugarman).

él:

808-

�uhO-

Shock Therapy, Am. J. Psychiat.,
heinstein and L. Linn).

Its Relation to the

Theory of
222; 22-26, 1952 (with Drs. E. A.

10. IBychosis During Electroshock Therhpy:
'

Brain
Sodium")
Sodium
("Amytal
Organic
in
Amobarbital
of
Diagnostic
Disease, Am. J. Psychiat., 109: 12, 889-89h, 1953 (with Drs. E. A.
Ueinstein, L. A. Sugarman and L. Linn).
Use

Neurol.
Arch.
of
Denial
Factors
in
Illness,
Personality
Q2: 355—367, 1953 (with E. A. Heinstein, M.D.).

&amp;

Psychiat.,

Behavior Disturbances Following Cataract Extraction, Am. J. Psychiat.,
and
L.
Linn).
E.
1953
A.‘
einstein
(with
Drs.
281—289,
219}

Delusional Reduplication of Parts of the Body, Brain, 7?: h5-60, l95h
(with Drs. s. A. deinstein, s. Halitz, and J. hozanshiT:

Serial Administration of the "Amytal Test" for Brain Disease: Its Diag195h
&amp;
217-226,
Neurol.
Arch.
and
Psychiat.,
Value,
Prognostic
nostic
ll:
(with Drs. E. A. Heinstein and S. Malitz).
16. Ludic Behavior in Patients with :rain Disease, J. Hillside Hospital,
A.
Sugarman).
and
L.
B.
A.'Heinstein
l95h
(with
Drs.
98-106,
2:

17.

Test in Mental Illness, J. Hillsiﬁe Hospital.,
(with Drs. M. Fink and E. A. ﬂeinstein).

The Amytal

Q;

3-13, 1955

Amer.
"Irritative"
Lesions,
in
of
Functioning
Intellectual
Patterns
18.
PSychologist, 25 h02, l95h (with Dr. E. A. Meinstein).

19.

"Spatial inattention" in Patients with Localized Lesions of the CereN.
S.
l95h
(with
327-328,
Drs.
Psychologist, 2:
Pollack and M. B. Bender).

brum, Amer.
M.

Batteery,

20. The Adaptive Role of Behavior Accompanying Brain Disease as Exemplified
by the Phenomena of Reduplication, Amer. Peychologist, 2; h90, l95h (with
Dr. E. A. ieinstein).
21.

Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological ASpects, Springfield, I11.,
Charles C. Thomas, 1955 (with Dr. E. A. ;einstein).

22.

Coma
Therapy,
Insulin
Body
After
of
of
Parts
the
Jelusional [@dnplication
M.
and
Fink).
D.
Graubert
1955
(with
lBh—lh7,
Drs.
J. Hillside Hosp., g:

and Pain Asymbolia, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

23. ’kithdrawal, Inattention,
Psychiat., 1h: 235—2h8, 1955 (with Drs.

s.

A.

neinstein ana'h.

H.

&amp;

Slote).

Spatial Inattention in Focal Cerebral Lesions, Brain, in press (with
Drs. C. S. Battersby,

M. B.

Bender and.M. Pollack).

�25. Autokinetic Movement in Patients with Sensory and.Motor Disturbances, J.
M.
M.
and
B.
Pollack
S.
(with
Drs.
H.
Battersby,
Exp. Psychol., in press
Bender).
26. Relation Between Altered Brain thction and Denial in Electroshock Ther&amp; Peychiat., in press (with Drs. M. Fink and
A.M.A.
Meurol.
Arch.
apy,
E. A. heinstein).
27.

Mount
Sinai
of
J.
With
Picture
Schizophrenia,
Clinical
a
Encephalitis
Hosp., a1; 1955 (with Drs. E. A. Heinstein and L. Linn).

Korin:

Dr.
.1.

The
New

Effects of Electroshock
York University, 1955.

on

Retroactive Inhibition, Ph.D. Thesis,

Dr. Hargz Goldenberg:
and
of
Amino
Acid
Esterase
Trypsin
Activities
of
the
1.
Chymotrypsin, Arch. Biochem., 22; 15h, 1950 (with V. Goldenberg).
pH Depenﬁence

2.

Several Derivatives of Acetyl-dl-phenylalanine, J.
5317, 1950 (with V. Goldenberg and A. McLaren).

Am. Chem.

Soc., lg:

3. Effect of Ultraviolet Light on the Specific Activity of Chymotrypsin
and Trypsin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 72: 1131, 1951 (with A. D. McLaren).

h.

An

Ester
Leucine
of
Ethyl
Hydrolysis
the
Enzyme-Catalyzed
Into
Inquiry

Gold1951
V.
(with
Biochem.
110,
Acta,
Biophys.
1;
et
Chymotrypsin,
by
enberg and A. D. McLaren).

5. Report D-12, April 1, l9h6; cf. pp. 117-119, concerning 8-Hydroxyquinoline Method (Alcohol Extraction), in C.J. Rodden's "Analytical Chemistry
of the Manhattan Project", (with J. Greenspan, M. J. Sohuler, D. Taub,
and A. S. Carlson).
6. Calcification. V. Influence of Fluoride and Cyanide Ions in the Presence
and Absence of Magnesium, Proc. Soc. Exp.
A. L. Sobel).

Biol., 19:

719, 1951 (with

kaline Earths on Survival of the Calcify1952
(with A. E. Sobel).
695,
Exp.
Soc.
Proc.
g1:
Mechanism,
Biol.,
ing

7. Calcification. IX.Inf1uence of

A

8. Calcification. IV. Influence of Strontium and Magnesium Ions on Calcification in vitro, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., IQ: 716, 1951 (with A. E.
Sobel and A. Hanok5.

9. Calcification. XI. Studies of the Incorporation of Citrate in Calcification in vitro J. Dent. Res., 3;: L97, 19Sh (with A. E. Sobel
and E. Schmeriler).

�~h2§

Ions
and
Cyanide
Fluride
by
Inhibition
10. Calcification. XII. Cation-Linked
&amp; Hed., éé: 27S,
Biol.
Soc.
Exp.
Proc.
in B-GlycerophOSphate Medium,
l9Sh (with A. E. Sobel).

19Sh.
26:
690,
Chem.,
Anal.
Plots,

ll.

Rectification of Nonlinear Beer's

12.

Curves.
Nonlinear
Activity
of
Rectification
Biochem. &amp; Biophys., ég; 288, 195h.
Enzyme

Law

I.

Preliminary, Arch.

�Studs.“
'1

tho room.
L

01‘

91‘

the

“mum

Width.

01‘

tn:

1::

Win

A

man}:

Wm

Wtm «mum,
01’

khanm tar claatraoncophﬂampw

W!
«mum “W

studying 01-min manta].

with

WW

in brain

during tin

mmmd.
m

and

Wm M

wt yaw.

W

method.

for

YMMMW
mmmmno
at Madam ta
stimulation

mm
W
m,mmmmuhhmmmmmmmmpumm
thew. m
Wu.
Mitmun.
mental
W
«mum
int-mm:
um
M m
huts, ham

gatima or tho

hymn

dam-uni"
affect: of

inn-ms,

and

human

um

cum-a.

tannin; haloahraaanmkin

acid (mp-was) an anal:

and

In tho

mm-

5:

yaw, a

my at tho was in brain function during mmmuw mm «I
Mpmholamu. Dre WWW”. Kmmlwomm
and
the
Pink
to
Dr.
fellow
of
tha
a
«mm.
m
mum
«mm.
Mutilation tar Inna“): Win an imam to sup-mu that kbonhary work.

“W.

Ha

rm
on

with a

Main: 1.

W

1953

In

a alumni

ultimatum

immut-

In tbs

Ané’t‘tmwmu
aluminum
tantalum
tho integrator! “My an

laboratory was «unnamed

mam than math!

Wamhéin

11W brain mum.

the

1mm
ammo:
65

m
W
of
{w
with
maul
mania
111mm,
dwmatu
”mum
3W
m mm
mum to mmm mime. Mam dim, mun WI ef pain;
mwnwmmmmumwmmotmmmmm»
mtkm; with «13m (litmus-I m tuna-Id ma amtralkd with anal-put:
drugs. may ammu- m
ta m mammal mm a:
am:
1m1uuoha
During tho yaw, $5

mutton

tum-Ind.

More than half.

aw

85.1:

mm}.

hospi'alk

m-

mmr

M

m mammal «mum

at...

am

an.

an.

�4-»

mmmaohmmmmwmwmmmm ”mutate
ermg
than
thﬂu
Ina
1mm
yum,
”we“.
macaw
«:1th
at

mum.

mmmwmnmmsunmmmmumm

:Mz‘mmwmmmmnwdwumﬂoftb

W.
«ammuﬁmmnsmmmmmmmuuumma
mm m

In addition. tan

on

m

at mammalian!!-

mmmmm McMithmmmmmmngnmm_

mmammmomrmmmammmmmammm

uttkﬂhoapim.

.

wmmm, s.

A.

at .1:

The

mm, M. am PM

o:
mama: mm in
m
damn

IWtSMﬂs (Jam)

Bibltoﬂ (1953)

1953:»

m.

mm. m. tau-m, 9.5.. Ramon. n. m
mm
on Pmopum,
Mm... Jam 1953.
il'ink. K...

m
m,

M; m.

u. and Bond», 11.3.: remap-um a:

w man-11y mm:

m

mm at mm.“-

51mm mm. Stimuli

Now.
a m. nu. mam-w (Jar-u) 1953.
am.
mm,
3. m: m, m A sumac-1 away ’or a mummm mom-m,
am. swam no». 2167*?! (March) 1953.

rm,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67254">
                <text>Progress and annual reports; research activities (folder title 2/2).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67255">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67256">
                <text>mfp-03-01-001-0-003</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67257">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67258">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67259">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67260">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67261">
                <text>Letter to Fink; Somatic Therapy Research Program; Monthly report; Research Progress reports - Department of Biochemistry; Letters to Dr. Miller; Electroshock Therapy Evaluation Program; Annual Report - Department of Neurology; </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67262">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67263">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80928">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87489">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94050">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100611">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6724" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3781">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/4b34d77a93adfdf543aae63a1ead5831.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9a3d77013a79d7057f02f224ed583aa6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="104407">
                    <text>42.5.3.
gm
Standin- of tho
‘

alteration in

mum

the focus or

mufﬁns

1 laboratory

for olmtmnmphllompm

studying
A

or the Dona-“mm. of

Manley

during eh.

ambuahod,

and

”min manta]. oyndma m. introduced.

grasp

Band»,

dapreuivu

m

mm

ammmud with unplug“

illmaua, men-u,

man-hm.

We:

m

method-

for

on,

The

tha change in pal-cerium in

and following alactrocomulaivo therapy.

“fact. at barbiturate”, ”mun
um um intentiuly studied.
“new of the

Wan.

put you.

invents;pmimWe“
51113393“ to alwltmm stimulation buts, hogan

at tinted study

gationa or the raspame of
by Dr.

w

with changu in brain funeum wan

and

1.780er acid (181345)

on such

The

mammal

latter part or the year, a corn-3.1M
in brain function during data-woman“. thump: m
In tho

m psychologists. Dr.

march assistants to

the

Imam

Robert him and In; R. Karin worn uppointod

«Mt,

tad Dr.

in: link

a fellow of the

ﬁatiml

for Infmtiln Fanlyain mu appoinm to mum” the laboratory work.
oi: Databa- 1, 1953 am
charmmloganQ laboratory was cmbliahod
with a Man. 8 clam}. instrumnt. In the mum. mm month. 65 mount.

are

taken.

01'

than

19

um emulation muons m

M in the ovum of

th. integrated study an altered bran functian.
[mung tn. year. 55 consultation mum
matured. ﬁgure than half
of mania mental am.» “mated with amt-"sin 111m“,
were far
or mhtod to duotmnhook thonw‘ 301m awn». neuritic types of pain,
1nd abnoml involunm menu and. up the bulk of
mum.
81.: patients with «ism «11:0er um mum and controlled with anaemia
to the neurologiml service of mi. Sinai
amen. Thu. patient. are
fie-pita?! m further ima’oiauogu for nmlogim conditions chums»! at tho

m

mum:

We

mm

haapi talc

�~2-

m pmodural chm m introdum by an dmﬂunﬁ. u an Ad to
evaluating thu uremic mum sum, tn. «ma “but” no introduood m
Ivar
round
tbu
1m
thin
m1:
«as
worming an m
put
yaw,
mum.
'

folio-“mg the

am

of

ehktrolhm mutant”

and

the In part of the

in
maid». mu m at mmimlmholim
inugrltod study an olectrwhaoh
in
(month)
A: In Want
chlorich
new“
mmmm mum;

as mutated.
and

at

«Iv

m

tho

no!

emu)“

m1- want. 1: mm «amnion: in indumn; roux-Man

mum cum mining agent:

50mm.

121

Mates!

m:

or thetroﬂmck

wanmu. 3.. at 4:1: The damn“ an at maharhiul ”dim in
Mam” m. Jaw. Psych. zommm. (Jump) 1953.
Eu-

31131108.»

(1953)

Mr.

11.8.! Kit.“ of
link, I!" Harm, 9.3., Bath-awn, I. and
on Perception, Trans. Amer. Hm. used... Jun- 1953.

m,

it"

Green,

)1-

and Binder,

Simultaneous
3.3.x Perception of

&amp;
Malta,
am. mm mu. m».
mm»
5:
A
ma
a.
sum-um.
study
m:
a
ﬁnk.
Tmhw,

w mummy

Jour. 31mm. Hosp. 236%71 (Ha-ch) 1953.

117th34¢9

m
I

thtu

M11.

um.)

emu

1953.

momma mamas,

�October h

, 195“

Interin Report
Dear Dr. Miller,

requested I wish to report that the following projects have been in progress this summer in this
department.
1. Effect of electroshock on memory func»
tion tests. Twenty-four patients are now fully studied;
the data is beingA collected; and a report is planned
for the 1955 A P meetings.
2. Effect of Lysergic Acid on perceptual
functions, including Rorschach; and on blood chemistry.
These experiments are now in progress and will be completed by the end of the year.
‘E3iy Under the terms of the U.S.P.H.S. grant
a continuing study of perceptual changes in insuli n,
and EST patients is now in planning.
a. A psychiatric rating scale, modified
after Malamud, is in use. As soon as it is standardized
in this population, it will be presented to the Research
Eonmittee.
£5. The Funkenstein test (Hecholyl) in EST
and insulin therapy is being checked in our pop—
As you

ulation.

Sincerely,
HF33RB

�Obtober

Projects in Progress

as.

1954

/

,2-\

Relation of mental changes to behavior f‘
1'
(1) Effect of organic mental syndrOme on results of EST.
(3) Changes in perception with I92.
\
(3) Can ACTH. cortisone alter brain function and thereby

(a)

l

;

i

results of

(b)

EC!

or ICT?

\

\

Psychophysical measurements of Psychiatric terms - an operational
approach to terms of diagnosis.

(1) Denial: Relation to improvement in electroshock

Relation of premorbid character to change in
behavior in electroshock.
(2) Ambivalence:

Is

it possible

to measure ambivalence by

psychophysicel menad and relate to the past history of

the patient in choice of neurosis?

Relation of chemical agents to psychoses. psychological.

(o)

biochemical and behavioral aspects.
(d)
9

Rating Scale'

�October 1?, 195b
Dear Dr. Rachlin,

requested I wish to report the following
projects have been i n progress this summer.
(1) Effect of electroshock on memory f unction,
FRO, Amytal tests and nerceptual tests. Twenty
four patients have been fully shielded. The
first revert on the relation between the
response to treatment and the occonotal test is being
submitted to the A E A. The observat ion support
As you

the thesis that there is

a

relation between t

development of an organ.

he

Mental syndrome and

improvement.

Effect of lysergiv acid on perce ptual
functions. Rorschack and blood chemistry. The
psychiatric and psychologic tests are being
prepared for presentetnion at the American
Psychopathological Association.
(3) Under the terms of the U.S.P.H.S. gr ant
a continuing study of perceptual changes in
insulin and EST patient a is now i n planning.
(3) A psychiatric re.ing scale, modified after
Halemud, is i n use. As soon as it is standardized
in this population, it will be presented to the
(2)

Research Committee.

(5)

The Punkenetein

test (neohom) in

EST

and
__

�nsulin the rapy
population.
1

18

being checked

Since rely,

1

n our

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67234">
                <text>Progress and annual reports; research activities (folder title).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67235">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67236">
                <text>mfp-03-01-001-0-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67237">
                <text>1953-1954</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67238">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67239">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67240">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67241">
                <text>Annual report - department of neurology; Interim report to Dr. Miller; Progress Report; Letter to Dr. Rachlin;  </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67242">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67243">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80926">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87487">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94048">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100609">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6727" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6534">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/5fddf7ec4456da255de4e0d4b1d4c29a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e18d9957071a91ab8e65015c0fde8e69</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107141">
                    <text>January 15, 1956

Perceptual Changes Induced
M

Prorress Report
Maximilian Fink,
Director of Research

M. D.

927

By Drugs and

Electroshock

(c)

September 1, 1954—January 1, 1956

'

Hillside Hospital
Glen Oaks,

New

York

aHEMRY:

Beginning with a study of perceptual changes induced by electroshock, emphasis has shifted to a study of the mechanism of electroshock
therapy. A marked relationship was demonstrated between clinical improve-

ment and certain indices of altered cerebral function. Early, persistent
and severe changes in amytal tests and the electroencephalograms were ob-

served; but no correlation was demonstrated for memory
double simultaneous stimulation.

tests or tests of

clinical

improvement did not alvays persist, further studies
to elucidate the relationship of premorbid personality to both short and
long term improvement were devised. Preliminary data demonstrate a relationship between persistent improvement and a specific character pattern.

Since

suprathreshold simultaneous tactile stimulation techniques failed
to discriminate in terms of clinical response, threshold studies utilizing
square—wave electrical stimuli were undertaken. This technique elicits patterns of altered function not clinically apiarent, and the relation of these
patterns to clinical improvement is under study.
As

�PROGREeS REPORT

The

inception of

M~927

in September

1954 permitted an expansion

of studies previously undertaken as a Fellow of the National Fbundation
for Infantile Paralysis. Three studies were in progress: (a) evaluation
of the amytal test(l) in psychiatric subjects; (b) relation between al~
tered cerebral function and tests of simultaneous tactile stimulation;

(c) effect of lysergic acid diethylamide, pervitin, and amytal on visual perception.
and

In the amytal

test, the patient is

asked

questions concerning

his illness, orientation, and recall before and immediately after the intravenous administration of amytal to the point of nystagmus and slurred
speech. In the original studies at the Nount Sinai Hospital, the development of disorientation and explicit denial of illness was
clearly associated with diffuse cerebral dysfunction(1).

As a

admissions to Hillside Hospital were tested.

patients

control study, consecutive

Of 68

interviews essayed a-

not had recent electroshock therapy, 56 were adequately completed. Of these, 51 were "negative" for brain dysfunction;
and of the five " positive" results, hree showed other
evidence of brain

mong

damage.

who

had

In addition to further defining the scope of

this test as

an

in-

dex of

cerebral dysfunction, the study demonstrated other differences from
a group of patients with physical disabilities but without brain
disease.
There was more

transient disorientation

and

denial,

more withdrawal and

ludic behavior and more changes in the syntactical aspects of language in
the psychiatric population.‘
._____.________________________..____.______________________________________
*Kahn, R.L., Fink, M., &amp; Heinstein, E.A.: The "Amytal Test"
in
Patients
with mental Illness, J. Hillside Hospital ﬂzﬁ-lj, January 1955.

�2.
When

such

tests

were applied

in patients

who

had

recently under-

gone electroshock

therapy, "positive" amytal reSponses were elicited.
This aberration had previously been reported by Weinstein, Linn, and

Kahn(2), and formed the basis for

their explanation of the

mode

of action

of electroshock therapy.
In a second study,

patients undergoing electroshock therapy

tested by simultaneous tactile stimulation methods(5).

With

were

increasing

amounts of electroshock therapy,

patients demonstrated consistent alterations in the perception of the two stimuli. Failure to report one stimulus and mislocalization of one or both stimuli in predictable patterns
were demonstrated.

These

patterns

were

transient, however. Electroence-

phalographic records were also obtained in these subjects at weekly

vals.

progressive appearance of delta activity,

The

first

inter-

as random, low

voltage activity, and later as symmetric, high voltage bursts, previously
described by numerous authors(4) was confirmed. Attempts at this time to

correlate changes in the electroencephalogram

tests

and the simultaneous

tactile

unsuccessful.

were

third

group of

studies, of the effects of d~lysergic acid die—
thylamide and pervitin on visual perception were inconclusive. A variety
of ill~defined subjective perceptual alterations which failed of objec—
tive verification were observed and the study was discontinued.
A

The

experiences with amytal tests and simultaneous

tactile tests

formed the background for the studies undertaken since September 1954 un-

der

H—927.

To

determine the relationship between various indices of a1-

tered brain function (the amytal test, the electroencephalogram, and

�5.

tactile tests)

simultaneous

a correlated study was undertaken.

Conse—

cutive patients referred for electroshock therapy were studied. Treatment was administered three times a week. Electroencephalograms
were done
weekly on a day following a treatment.

tests

Simultaneous

tactile stimulation

tests were done once a week immediately preceding a treatment and 48 hours after a previous treatment. In addition,
special tests
of memory and recall utilizing the technique of retroactive inhibition
were carried out at weekly intervals.
and amytal

In addition to

intercorrelations between these indices, we were
anxious to determine the relation between such changes and clinical alteration in behavior. For this purpose a clinical evaluation of improvement

at weekly intervals during treatment

was made

ing therapy.
and the

These

patients

and unimproved.
showed

by

the

ratings

were
The

symptoms

their therapists;

and up to one month follow~

were made independently

classified as markedly

of the other indices,

improved, moderately improved,

markedly improved patients were those

that brought
and the

who no

longer

to the hospital; were rated improved

them

nurses' notes confirmed such aspects as being

able to sleep without medication, better appetite and improved capacity to

participate in hospital activities.
showed no change

The unimproved

or only transient changes.

were those who had some imtrovement

in

The

patients

were those who

moderately improved patients

symptoms, but

in

whom

severe dis-

turbances as obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas or somatic preoccupation

persisted.
A

marked

correlation

was found between

clinical

improvement and

early, persistent and severe changes in both the amytal tests and the

�4.
electroencephalogramx

to occur.

No

If

such changes did not appear, improvement

failed

such correlations were manifest between improvement and the

tests of recall function or

changes in simultaneous

tactile tests.

Thirty patients were essayed in this study, but 24 were success-

fully concluded.

At one month

post-treatment, eleven were classified by

the supervising psychiatrist as markedly improved; six as moderately improved; and seven as unimproved.

the markedly improved patients, every
one had at least one positive amytal test during treatment. Of the 50
tests given to this group, 58 (76%) were positive. In contrast, of the
unimproved

of the 45

Of

patients, five of the seven never showed a positive result, and
tests administered to this group, only 6 (15%) were positive.

The

moderately improved group showed more positive responses than the unimproved patients, but fell far short of the much improved
group.
In addition, there were consistent'changes in language and
non-

verbal aspects of behavior indicating alterations in adaptive mechanisms
in the much improved group, even in interviews not employing amytal.
These

alterations

were

either minimally or only transiently manifest in

the unimproved group and then only under the influence of sodium amytal.*
Concomitant studies of the electroencephalograms taken on a day

preceding the amytal
cords were

first

test indicate

M

a similar

relationship.

measured for per-cent time slow wave

The 160

re-

(delta) activity,
frequency of the

the duration of burst activity and the amplitude and
slowest waves present. The records were then placed in a rank serial
order.
Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association,
May 10, 1955; and submitted to the Archives of
Neurology &amp; Psychiatry for
*

publication.

�5.

falling in the upoer third were labelled "high abnormality" and
those in the lower third as " low abnormality". Of the much improved
Those

patients,

25% showed a

ment; 80%

after

two weeks and 90%

patients, iowever,

first

after three

weeks.

The

treat-

In the unimproved

none had a high degree abnormality record during the

three weeks and only one had such a record by the fourth

treatment.
these

high degree abnormality after one week of

records of the moderately improved patients

week

fell

of

between

two groupsc*

Changes

in

memory and

learning were tested in these subjects by

using the principle of retroactive inhibition.

recall of three-letter originally learned

By

the serial testing of

words following the

interpola-

ted learning of nonsense syllables, patterns of decrement in learning and

recall
ment up

elicited. As a group, the patients showed increasing impairto the third week of treatment, and a rapid inorovement after the

were

cessation of treatment.

No

relationship, however, could

be

established

between impairment and resnonse to treatment.**
The

responses of these subjects to simultaneous

touch stimuli were also assessed.

ability to identify

and

While an

localize the

two

tactile tests using

increasing impairment in the

stimuli could be demonstrated

with increasing treatment, no relation to improvement was noted.
By

tent

the spring of 1955,

and severe changes

tal tests

it

was

our conclusion that early,

persis-

in both the electroencephalogram and in the

amy-

are a necessary, though not sufficient, pre~requisite for
..___....-—_.

m---_—.

»

Presented at the joint meeting of the Eastern and Southern E1ectroence~
phalographic Societies, Bethesda, September 50, 1955.
*

Presented before the Electroshock Research Association, May 8, 1955, and
awarded their Annual Prize Award and cited for excellence in research design.
**

�6.
improvement following electroshock therapy.

initial part of the

This obserVation confirmed the

hypothesis of weinstein, Linn and Kahn(2) ascribing the

therapeutic results of electroshock to the facilitation of patterns of denial by altered brain function. But was it true that the patient's improvement

resulted

from denial of

illness or denial of

other a-

More

symptoms?

daptive mechanisms manifest? Also, within a few months a number of the markedly improved patients had relapsed.
At

this time,

a second

Why?

electroshock population

was

studied.

First,

to confirm our previous observations on the relation between improvement
and changes

in the amytal tests and the electroencephalogram.

if exnlicit

denial is a mechanism in improvement,

it

post—treatment and directly related to improvement.
advanced

that those patients

who showed

cit verbal denial" personality

Secondly,

should be manifest
The

hypothesis

the characteristics of the

would be those more

was

“eXpli—

likely to maintain

im—

provement.
Between April and August,
were

studied. Satisfactory data

electroencephalograms and amytal
and again d

ring the second and

thirty consecutive electroshock patients
was

obtained in twenty-five subjects.

The

tests were carried out before treatment,
third week of treatment. The patients were

again independently rated for improvement by a supervising psychiatrist du-

ring treatment, and one month following treatment. These patients are also
now being seen in six month follow-up visits to assess the " long-term"
changes.
In addition to these

of subjects

was

tests, the

premorbid personality of

this

group

assessed by an interview with family members, psychologic

�7.

tests

and a

tachistoscopic study.

in independent interviews.
to

A

At

least

two

close relatives were seen

standardized questionnaire has been devised

den
verbal
"explicit
the
of
indicative
factors
characterological
elicit

this study fifteen characteristics defined as typiSuch
in
selected.
were
of
absent
in
this
personality
tyne
or
cally present
tons include prestige consciousness, sensitivity to criticism, imagination,
temper and attitudes to sex and illness. Each patient is rated on a scale

nial" personality.

of

0

to

denial

2

For

for each item - the higher score signifying a greater tendency to

o

l

Each

patient vas also tested

by a standard psychologic evaluation

These
Thematic
and
Tests.
Rorschach
the
Apperception
including
battery
tests were assessed for character structure and the usual tynes of defense

or adaptation.

tional

A

tachistoscopic study

was

devised, in which pairs of emo-

and non-emotional words were flashed on a screen

at

10, 20, 50, 100

patient's ability to identify the words,
the reaction time, and the distortions were ascertained. This pre-treat~
nent data is now being studied as to its ability to clarify the patient's
and 250 millisecond

periods.

The

usual defense patterns.
Only the short term

group nine

uatients

were

results of this study are available.

Of

this

rated as showing marked improvement; twelve as

mo-

derate inprovement; and four as unimproved.
Of

the physiological indices assessed in these patients, a signi-

ficant difference

was

again noted in the anytal tests and the electroence—

phalograms between the markedly improved and unimproved groups.
no

There was

difference between the markedly and moderately improved groups.

�8.

relation of personality ratings and improvement, an
indefinite correlation was manifest in this small group. Lcores expressive
of tendency to "oxalicit verbal denial" ranged from O to 25 in a scale of O
Asgarding the

to 50.

The

following table describes the natterns of each grouw

when "high"

and "low" scores are compared.

(10 and Below)

Low

ﬁarked Improvement (9)

Hoderate

"

"

Uninproved

High (Above 10)

2

7

(12)

7

5

(4)

e

0

Because the scores were unusually low

in this group, a sample of

consecutive private electroshock estients were studied.

lity ratings

and

clinical evaluations

were made.

To

Similar persona-

date, ten patients have

this study is continuing.
This study is still in progress. The six month follouaup is now
being undertaken and further correlations will be done. Kcanwhile, certain
conclusions can be entertained. The relationship between alteration in the
been studied and

physiological tests and improvement

It became apvarent that
the patients manifesting clinical exolicit denial of illness post-electro—
was

confirmed.

shock did not have the best long—term response.

Lesser degrees of adaptive

better prognostic value. This observation led to an analysis of the only verbatim recorded data for this series - the language changes

changes may have

in the amytal interviews.

The

data is

now

being analyzed for a variety of

adaptive language changes and correlations with clinical assessment are to
be made.

�9.
Chile these studies of the ohenbmena underlying improvement in

electroshock therapy have been under investigation, the

tual studies

have run concurrently.

group studied, the lack of

In the

first

(1954) electroshock

correlation between simultaneous tactile sti-

mulation tests and improvement

was

nuzsling.

The

tactile tests

tremely gross, hovever, and this might be a factor.
a more meaningful

was

developed.

anticipation that

be obtained from

Previous exteriences with von Frey hairs for

such threshold stimulation had convinced
mulus

In

were ex-

this index if threshused, equisnent for threshold electrical

correlation could

old stimulation techniques were

stimulation

tactile percen-

me

that the variation in the sti-

often exceeded the fluctuations in hreshold, and the studies were

inconclusive.

Reports by Segal(5) on the perception of square-wave elec-

trical stinuli

led to our development of similar equipment.

84~B

stimulators and isolation units monitored by a

deliver independent stimuli.

A

Dnnont

Two

Grass

oscillograph

switch box and l centimeter steel disc e-

Difficulties in isolating the stimuli
precluded this testing being carried out satisfactorily until septenber.
A continuation of the second electroshock group has been in prolectrodes corolete the assembly.

gress since September.

The same

nhysiological tests and personality assess~

patient's responses to simultaneous
hreshold electrical stimuli is tested before treatrent and at weekly intervals. To date, 18 patients have been studied. The same phenomena of exments are undertaken.

In addition, the

tinction, displacenent, nerseveration, and confabulrtion described in patients with organic mental syndrome with suprathreshold stimuli by Fink,
4.

�10.
Green, and Bender(6) are apparent

technique

elicits these patterns

in these natients during treatment. This

clinically manifest.
while extinction is also manifest in yrs-treatment testing, displacement
and perseveration are related to the extent of treatment. This study is

now

though they are not

in progress.
Concomitant with these studies, preliminary observations of a

milar nature have been

made

in patients undergoing insulin

coma

si—

therapy.

Recent reports of the value of prolonged come as the basis for improvement by Revitch, Kwalvasse? and Caplan, Sharass and Rowsell, and Yeager

gt

al&lt;7&gt; have been confirmed

in our patients. In

reported a direct relationship between altered brain function, altered patand
imnrovement.*
and
behavior
terns of adantation in lan mace
clinical
t:
.
'
-

one unusual case we

r

R.L., Graubert, D.H. and Fink, N.: Delusional Reduplication of Parts
of the Body After Insulin Coma Therapy, J. Hillside Hbsnital ﬂ;154v147, 1955.
*

Kahn,

�11‘
Summary

of
Our

Work

to Date and Plans for the Future:

studies of perceptual changes induced by electroshock are pro-

is in elucidating the
factors underlying improvement following electroshock therapy: changes in
shysiologiccl indices; adaptive changes in language and behavior in resnonse
ceeding in two concurrent and related courses.

One

to altered brain function; and the factor of personality.
study of the watterns of threshold

tactile perception

The second

is

a

under conditions of

altered cerebral function; their relation to "inprovenent" following

elec—

troshock; and the relation to other indices of altered cerebral function.
The problems

before this study are conylex.

The

rating of "improve-

is primitive and further vork alcnf this line is mandat ry. The delineution of the explicit verbal denial character is a gross anprOfination
of this problem. FUrther study of the role of personality and a descrip-

went"

tion of defensive operations other than denial which may
significance is in progress. To clarify in our data the

have therapeutic
203

beneficial

be
which
ascribed to "general interest",
electroshock
can
of
therany
result
"spontaneous cure" or "placebo" effect, a control study is being instituted
on February 1.

Titb the concurrence of the Sedical Board of Hillside Yos-

be
will
electroshock
referred
for
therauy
treated, by ranpital, pitients
dom selection, by either pentotbal-convulsive electroshock or jentothal—

subconvulsive stimulation.

The

cerebral chmnjcs induced by pentothal-

subcenvulsive stimulation are miniwal and result in a minimal inprovenent

rate(8)

o

�M

References

l. einstein,

E.A., Lahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A., &amp; Linn, L.: Diagnostic Use
of Amobarbital sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am. J. Tsychiat. 112:

889—894, 1955.

2. Heinstein, E.A., Linn, L. &amp; Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During Electroshock
Therapy: Its Relation to a Theory of Shock Therapy, Am. J. Psychiat.
102:22-26, 1952.
5. Bender, H.B., Fink, H., &amp; Green, N.: Patterns in Perception of Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. §§3555-362,
1951-

,

~

4. Pacella, B.L., Barrera, o.”., a Kalinowsky, L.: Variations in the Electroencephalogram Associated with Electric Shock Therapy of Patients with
Mental Disorders, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., ﬂl:567~58#, 1942.
f‘!

5. Segal, Harry: Prick Threshold stimulation with Square ‘ave Current: A
New Heasure of Skin Sensibility, Yale Jour. Biol. &amp; Med., g§:145-154 1955.
A

6. Fink, 3., Green, D. &amp; Bender, U.B.: Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign
of Organic Mental Syndrome, Eeurology.g:46-58, 1952.

,

7. (a) Revitch, E.: Observations on Organic Brain Damage and Clinical Improvement Folloring rotracted Insulin Coma, Psychiat. auart. gé:
72, 1954.

(b) Kualwasser, S. and Caplan, M.: A Case_of Prolonged Insulin
Treatment, J. Hillside Hospital 35145, 1952.

Coma:

(c) Shagass, C. and Rowsell, P.W.: Serial Electroencephalographic and
Clinical Studies in a Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma, .M.A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 13:7059 1954.
(d) Yeager, C.L. 33 El:
glycemic Coma,

8. Ulett,

Electroencephalogranhic studies in PosthypoJ. Harv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 118:455, 1955.

of Matched Grougs in the Evaluation of
Convulsive and Subconvulsive Photoshock, Bull, Kenn. Olin. l§:158,
G. A.

gt_al:

The Use

�m

30, 1956

mama Ammm

m

mm
m

-

3.955

FollwingthsamﬂmdﬁnﬁamtheMamm,msmstyw
mrked by

integratim at um. 38mm with ongoing

15h.

mdnpamimotthsntaff. Maddiﬁmlgrantsm
wise rewind its first prize award.

Wk
left Ht. Sinai

In Jammy, Dr.

Service. ﬁr.
of

m

antivities

mummthe

un-

thyweloalt, swaths Ram

Kuhn,

Hospital after sighs

Weammma or altered mnbral

1103911131

Won.

yum durum to the

&amp; is author of

numerous

am

mus-

sum in mumpsycmogy and eo-mthar at tho mum, “Donna. at Illness,“
1955.
3a
these
1n
in
elsetmashock
is
the
waning
1121:“qu
mum

MWcmpopuhﬁm.

FM

Basin medatim for
at Heats}. Health.
In September, 19:.

Hiawarkhasbeensuppartodbyagrwtaf the
and by the U.S.P.H.3. Batimal Institute

W

MW
amiaammohpsycmmntamashwaxmbemwm
Joacph daft-e, 3.13., a graduate

the doctor-patient. nhtimﬁzip. In ntudias

.191qu the

at Baum

and tbs Ht. Sinai Heap-

mammmmwmsmwotmm Warsaw
mummmbm dmmﬁmmﬂjomedMs Mitosantim this

itals,Br.

am. ltmeMeftbumr,

mnmrmmgmwmmm.

thmwmtefizaﬁwwwthism.
In Bay, Dr.

W

..

Karin, 31.9.. of the Bemrch Service was

mama the

mporten
mammaemnmmmrm
mmmam
the

mmmacmammwmmwtmmcmma

Inthisstudy,usingtbatechnicofntmacﬁvninhibitimasammafmxy
change, Dr. Karin damnatmtad

W1.

and changes

in

that no connhtim existed

my.

In that Prize

Award

between the

citation, the

patient's

commitme

�wan-w.“—

m._-m_mm
.2...

wmmmmumothumhmumnaamchﬁw
ammuﬁm.
tho Iaml sums Instant-hip m
n:
an
April
m «mum
1951;,

19. 19559:.

W

mm.mw~amdtmtmthm. mummy

subject, “an Application of the

39% to

mums ﬂung.”

puma
mm.
min-rod for dammit”: meocMﬁomal
mandamus”

mus;- chum-mum: I proactive

3% m

consecutive

WWZMMBNWMWMt.Mamchsth

mummmmmtusiwwmamm
museum» cam,‘21 Maud
a: mum
25

signs

brain

mm

way

In

either:

mm,mm
arm‘iapmvmnt, «lawman chaudumratc undue, maimed.
mumawmuauormhmmmmuy.

or

‘tbfmpatientswithmt

Magic W,thmmnmimmudmdme

Winden’ummt. mmtmmmmunwmamw

www.m«mmmwucmumm
M‘mdﬁnas'mmu.‘

mmmmpmnumww
matthuoindimupwiﬁu,toarmwhimmmmmwmt
andmminpmod.

��mmwﬁainticnndlaur,mapomsﬁcatﬁtude. ﬁemmﬁadm-

W

his
mm 31me in 1mm Mam «new; and mommy
Muwmmammmtmm. hmmwmm
man-dad interview,

mks» of was recordings; or patimva mm at

mum'aomcrpumum; Mammmmmm

ﬁction test are in progress;

mgmw:
mmmwmmwmthn.manmmma.m
hwumunmmmmn

1:.

WW.Wmuumm.
smashmlsmbmmm. ammtnmmmmanmmm
chmtumpaﬁmtam

mm,mmmmmtomuom
MIMMWW.ItmmWartmmmmt

wawmmnnm.

mumm-mmmwmwamnm
mam.
”strata!
We
mama
pal”,
mm“
pm,

in this psyehintrm

Ounce-1m

lowering or blood

naming

studios

a: the

13

might

mm.
Amnammu
was
submitted
to ﬁn Journal at the man Emma. far publicaﬁm.
am
mdunﬁmafthoncholylhloodpnm

Wmm:
theﬁng
amt
5.

the

Institute, a working

mamueaumormwmat
fame

m

with tho

Munch

�”war-WW

wmmmmmm

WWI-mm »- W'rﬂm‘

-W~me_ m

.2..."

m

wiry previous 02&gt;an that alteration: in steroid heme excretion occurs timing mu natal illness, and that such alteration: rem ta

Service to

mm]. levels with

improvement. Brim Iii-amid

mention pettems are

bum

mama-MamdunngmdMaemotpmmwm.
hmmjecumnmrmdnmgm
I

km,
www.mrym. mmzuthmarmrpmm
W

em,mhe11mimgm,mdmetemidhomconjmm,thehnmtm
supported by a maximum grant rm Sb U.S.P.H.S.

Mitmfmdthatmmuemsmjmﬁcedtﬂmgﬂwwv
of
variant:
and
liver
mum urinary excretion tom
:15th Wine,

W

me mud 13 enter to establish: criteria tar rimang cmamazon”. mammwmmammatmubemmumsits.” macaw of channel 11m reacts-n1. the determinative is thereto“

PM

{@311th priorto marmMMgme.
ammmckudnmrnedoutmﬂnmmofommim.

prescribed

both

Soudthedmgistomﬂtoheemreﬁcdmcmedmmmusehrgumt
iscmfbdtutheenlﬂxiﬁyconﬂmgtheeaﬂiercbunaﬁmudeum

mumammgwutmthrmmnuammwm

the

WinchemextmlylmgmmmﬂWﬂewotthm.

Mammatwmfwtthatismmetchcmtedrwmaw
hemmemmmmmtcde»

mommwumm
ummmmmmummdmrmmmmmmmm.

InmﬁmﬁmcfmﬂermrkmmmmumetMaewchomautomate (an mm) by
a variety a! was new tee-ted for

mm,

their mums mummy: activity. Syaergic acid diethylaaidc (um) and ranto be far more
htea annﬁm were
than
inhibitem
other
can:

rm

MS

“adamant! with the «We! aux-me and pro-3m.

A

prom

�mWoumnmoa-ajmmumﬂm‘ummwmmm
mag mm manna 1w mm mm.

xmmmrmuuammummmwdmmum

A

m ”Wing was Mocha m- the ”106151“ mum of steroid sulfah

mm

rm biological fluids and for their colon-attic

«mum.

notw-

mmmmmummmmmnmabmwmnmmw
owe.

11mma
in
that
gamed:
cenjugam
It
tow
m
hem
mm. in
ﬁance
their urinary mam clearly nﬂocw
melanin.
a
m Wart-lathe

memuetmcﬁm.

hummumnulmuwrtou

Wmammnmmmummmanumtmm.

�.w—«w‘w-m. , . 3r

(b)
'

.mwvm-minmmﬂvw—W”w'w"w—vmWWWQVYHWW-mwzm'm mrw.

c 3

I

(:1)

I:

.W

3. Karin and s.

,.

From.

m:original

this»

Tim

may was conﬁned

by Dr.

WW

3.

nov‘

m‘!‘r‘rwm":’

me‘rmwt‘m

2mm,

hypothesis, reported in 1953. related

mmaamtmamtmormmmmmuymmw. mm

«antes of

mm

by clinical psychiatric ratings,

mm W

W
mummy:

tumﬁc

0.

by Dr. Kenn, and the
Appempum rear.
111$
figum
maﬁa: of piatums anti
minutiae. Late in tho yaw, having Moped indies: of

Wat“

swim

pro-

@0th

far

minim, a stack

«mmmmlammammumunommom.
(2)
anagram Wrath. R. Imam, super--

ﬁxing

mm
WM

an interdiawlplmzy

staff of Dr.

D.

Wrﬁ (mm:

(mm um) and mu
3. Patter {group activities} have unkind the Win).
as a the!»
apeutic agent. Wrath work has gone into tho Miami: of a behavioral
seal: that canine mite mm clinical change. In a pilot 3%, they d.-

must),

Dr. H. Koran (pmhology), Er. 1 12min

Wt

'mmmmaamqammmuuummurymmm
nations between patient
in patina”

W.

(3')

and thumpiaﬁ; and also he 9:131:13 manual

W
mm,

m:

onetime: with

In Septubor, {collating our

M. 3. shit and 6.

Gross,

alteratim

1313113112317

midmt mmnm,

Wasmdyatmmmuumaaapomwlmnmurormmm
Patients Mnmdforinmmmmdivimmtommm:
W.
unanimous” maivingmﬁminaulincmthanpy; andtuotherm-

Deaths. m: Indication is given in menacing
mommine
doses mm early toxic aims ataxia thn dingo for the period of obaemﬁcn.
The max-tormm,
Inmmgracionﬂygim.
mmmnco”

caving

for

3

�‘

~3-

W
aMdpmMenﬁmmmtmmmmeWmd
1h)

am.

WW£WM*
mm 3mm

he. Wmm lax-um,

W?

Win-15%.,

has

unbound

mamas-L. rummtm‘mmmmmmmpnb

é

!

I

i

i

mpmmunmmumuu.
mumrwm.
«Mammmbyuumwrummdamm.

�'V’R‘l-rmw‘vwm wwllﬂ-Nw-a. .rwawm-um—wzm.—

the

mm“:

In addition to tho

,

1m Whit ”Him,

I,“

tanning praise“

wars

—

I'w—

"tus-n—

Wmtion museum

WW:

MW
absenmum

in progress or

during 1955.
(1)

“Wu—raw...“ mu...“ ‘Irvﬁwwrva, wvwwku’J—w

In addition to the matted. and

vaﬁana of the patients undergoing margin! and cunt-gamma
Bumbag

m invesﬁgatod the following:
(a)
um:

W,

Dr. A.

Watch;
shockormum mnymumumtmmmmmviwm

mhalyl.

All

puma referred for electro-

mmmﬁmﬁonlterthe mmdﬂtymmm.

Mness of that» tons in

010::th
Wanna,

therapy results

Thurma-

is null

mmuan.
(b) mummmnma mmmwpomm that aim
¥

mdnr
‘

_

innlindomspmdamlnléhmnwgiunmre mtmmhumamirm
can periods, ms. P. Lam and A. washers tested 10 patina. It was my

mmmmwmmmommymuwm,
dosesotinomn.

tdodﬁomaminfadorto Minna-go
(2)

w m:“rim

inter-8161mm
of
the
were

mud,

and

SW

by

.th

armmm in Social

factors in patient care continued.

medita-

Sam at
Three lam”

m were tmdemm.

lass Edm Either, a candidate for 11.8 .83. at new 1014: mini-31w, startled
and
the length of
status at 1mignnt
the rolaﬁm
patients. a» reported that than no no «utterance batman tbs Meant manushorterandﬂu
Itanything,

mm

migmtm.

Wham

aim

mmmammnaumm

status mdiaehargabattarforthoiuigmt mp3. mnWobermmma
Prue by the kiwraiﬁ for tho ”mum at her study.

Inautudyutthomhtimatfaemdnghdnchugewalnaﬁemmum

�rﬁm.._—v
I

,_ ...

w‘w

WV..—

w"... r...

-

n... v.r—W~,. Sw‘~-,—w§zwrm—Im.

L-r-‘vQ‘m-W—w‘mm

cu:

'"m :gmnmmw—u—j

:1

~10;

ma,amdmttmmmcomga,npamﬁfﬂm¥atmotm-

mmmmawmm. mmmmmn,mmmm
ammmnmaummtwmmmmemm. teaWdamammmmmmnmﬁmmmmmm
magmgmdmrg patientsvithmmmpmin mononuinmmm
m.
'

1wmmm.m195§.wuamwupotpatmumemu

mmmmwmmatMuatmmmmmm his
mmumsm‘sgmwmsmmammuuamm

appumummbyumlam. ﬂﬂ.mmmps,mthommt

stMmmmmwmamunu-ammmw

:mwmnwm,mdmnrmwuobmmmmﬁmm
themﬂﬁergm.

mmw,rmmeMmmdu-m,bymu"mm

«wmxmmdwuam mmnawmm
fermdbyplvaicima otherthmpsycmmtu. £130,312

Immammnmmmmm.

“Wham;

.

���y‘ﬁ-WWWAMV'VUM amp"

Husky,

1min:

from

in “night and Roasttlmt‘ by
H. 3.8nw “3%; 3.3.3.3.c.o., 6.4.
MAL,
Imam, Shit!” 5.
The

Childm,

'

Putter,

Mm

sown.

Gsoop Hark st.

Killuidn Haunt-1,

Amer.
at
151.161.19553mw
Glam; lam,1955.

W,

J.

WM

Hosp.

g:

Orbhopaychiatric Ame...

�I

April 2, 1956
Corrected Copy
RESEARCH ACTIVITIES
ANNUAL REPORT

SAME AS ORIGINAL

-

1955

�IDENTICAI. UP TO END OF PARAGRAPH

1.

Research Programs were actively carried out by the Research Service,

resident and attending psychiatrists, and by departments at the hospital.
(a) Research Service:
With the two additions to the

expand

staff,

Dr. Fink was able to continue and

his studies of the changes in behavior'widch fallowed electroshock therapy.

These studies were directed

to understanding the effects of the treatment

on

the

brain, as well as trying to understand the changes in the patients behavior, language,and memory which might result from such changes in brain function. There
were

three different tests that were used.

The changes

that

occured in the brain

patterns (electroencephalogram) were studied and it was shown that it was
necessary to have some changes in the brain wave patterns before patients be-

wave

came

better

from electroshock.

Secondly, by giving the patients injections of

who
have
that
patients
it
changes in brain function show certain specific changes in language after the
drug. Thirdly, by special tests of the ability of the patients to perceive two
touches simultaneously applied to different body parts, it is possible to get

a seditive drug (sodium amytal)

is possible to

show

another index of brain function. These three indices, together, form the best
way

available today to demonstrate changes in brain function.
One way

of showing changes in a patient

is to study his language.

We

have

continued our studies of language following the administration of sodium amytal.

In addition, Dr. Jaffe has begun a study of the changes in language which follow
changes

in the doctors attitude to the patient. For this purpose

interviews between himself and the patient during which he changes

is recording
his own attitude

he

to the patient and then measures and examines the type of responses the patient
has to this change.

�-3-

interest has

Much

been aroused in the newer drugs in psychiatry.

A

pre-

vious study at Iﬂllside Hospital had shown that small doses of reserpine had very

little effect

on our

controlled study
and the

patients.

When

purified reserpine

was undertaken by one of

internist, Dr.

was made

available, a

the resident physicians, Dr. Wachspress

Blumberg, to determine whether high doses of reserpine

eleviate anxiety in our patients. It was the impression of the observers
that the reserpine failed to relieve anxiety symptoms regardless of dosage and,

would

that it increased the depressive symptoms. These observations will
reported in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of the Hillside Heepital.

moreover,

be

In the biochemical program, under the direction of Dr. Harry Goldenberg,
three projects were undertaken. In one study of the effects of chlorpromazine,
Dr. Goldenberé

carried out fundamental studies

azine to under-Stand where and

how

this

on

drug might

the metabolism of chlorprcm-

act. In this study

he was

us-

ing special techniques that he had developed.

In a study of the effect of

some new drugs

in inducing disturbed behavior

like schizophrenia, Dr. Goldenberg had studied a variety of alkaloids
for their ability to affect a special enzyme system (serum cholinesterase) he
reported that the most powerful of the new compounds (hallucinogens) known as

which looks

to be a very potent enzyme inhibitor as well.
the development of a very refined technique so that he can

lysergic acid diethylamide
Most remarkable was

measure very minute

was

quantities of drugs in the body. Thirdly,

fundamental studies on the function of the

liver in the

he made some

metabolism of hormones.

(b) Psychiatric Staff :

(1) Ambivalence Study: This study was continued by Dr. 3. Tarachow,
H. Karin and

5. Freidman. In this study, an effort is

patients develop the kind of neurosis that they do.
psychologic
measured.

tests as well as

made

to understnad

Emphasis

is

made by

why some

special

clinical interview, the degree of ambivalence is
This study attempts to prove a hypothesis that there is a relation bea

�tween the

loss of a parent early in life and the type or neurosis that developes

in adulthood.
(2) Subculture 5tugy: Under the directian of Dr. R. Navarre, supervising
Graubert
D.
Dr.
of
(resident therapist),
psychiatrist, an interdisciplinary staff
Dr. H. Korin (psychology), Mr; A. Lurie (social service) and.Miss Z. Putter (group

activities)

have

studied the hospital environment as a therapeutic agent.

They

are emphasizing the fact that just coming to a hospital has therapeutic value.
Also, that there are

many

agencies at the hospital which affect a patients change,

besides the specific psychiatric treatment that they are receiving from the phy-

sicians. In a pilot study, they demonstrated the value of a diary of patients
activities in clarifying the communications between patient and therapist, and
also to explain unusual changes in patients behavior. The staff has devoted a
good part of its time to understanding some of the aspects in thenhospital which
motivate changes in the patient.
In September, following our preliminary exper-

(3) Chlogprcmazine Study:

iences with chlorpromazine, one of the newer psychiatric drugs, two of the res-

ident psychiatrists Drs.
a

potential substitute for insulin

coma

coma

undertook a study of

are divided into two groups in a randem fashion

insulin

It is

this drug as
therapy. Patients referred for insulin

R. Shaw and G. Gross,

coma

hoped

-

one receiving

routine

therapy; and the other receiving chlorpromazine for three months.

that this study will

make a

little bit

clearer the usefulness of this

new drug.

(h) Prognostic creteria in Electroshock Therapy:
PARAGRAPH REMAINS UNCHANGED

�-5(0)

Departmental Research Programs: In addition to the cooperation between

various hospital services, the following projects were in progress or jndere
taken during 1955.
(1) Medical Demrtment: In addition to the medical and physiologic
observations of the patients undergoing treatment with the newer drugs, reserb
pine and chlorpromazine, Dr. A. Blumberg has investigated a new test-the

test has

Funkenstein Test. This

been described as being able to

a patient will improve following electroshock or insulin

coma

tell

whether

treatment. There-

fore, to find out whether this is true at Hillside Hospital, Dr. Blumberg has
been seeing all the patients prior to physical treatments. The test is harms
less and so far, the results are not available. Dr. Blumberg also studied the

possibility that insulin
a number of hours.

He

dosage could be made smaller

showed, both by

clinical

if it were

and laboratory

divided over

studies, that

divided doses were not as good as single large dosages of insulin.
(2) Social Service: Student affiliates in Social Service have been
studying the inter-relations of various factors in patient care. For the most

part these studies relate the length of hospital stay, discharge evaluation,
fee paying, and.a follow-up of patients who were unsuitable for Hillside HOSpital. These studies show great promise because they help us understand the
social factors in mental illness.

�Department of Biochemistry

..............................

April 30, 1956

Progress Report, MarchpApril 1256
A.

Active Projects

1. Steroid Sulfate Conjugates

It

that high speed liver supernates catalyze sulfate
conjugation with the following sterols: deso corticosterone, androsterone,
and cholesterol, as well as dehydroisoandrosterone, estrone, and testosterone.
The underlined sterols conjugate most readily. Considering the various positions in which the hydroxyl functions are located in these molecules, it may be
concluded that the conjugase(s) is nonspecific and can act at C 17, 21, 3a, 38,
has been established

and on phenolic compounds.

least four steroid sulfates have been separated from urine using paper
chromatography. The major conjugate has been identified as dehydroisoandroster—
one sulfate. The other conjugates are under investigation.
At

2. Chlogpromazine Study

of a hitherto unidentified metabolite of chlorpromazine have been
isolated from 9 liters of a pooled urine collected on the wards. The compound
crystallizes in beautiful colorless needles, m.p. 190°C. It has been sent out
for an element analysis. We suspect it is chlorpromazine mercapturic acid; the
analysis will reveal whether our hunch is correct. Another metabolite has been
separated electrophoretically and is believed to be an hydroxy derivative.
270 mg.

B.

Projects Planned

to study the metabolism of mescaline this Summer, provided funds
are forthcoming from the Dazian Foundation (see below). The investigation
would throw light on the mode of detoxication of hallucinogens in the body and
facilitate follow~up work dealing with trace endogenous alkaloid excretion in
mental disease.
We

C

hope

. Funds

grant application was submitted to the Dazian Foundation fer personnel
support and for the purchase of a spectrofluorometer. We were infonned that
funds are not available for instrumentation, but that personnel coverage may
be forthcoming. Further information is not available at this time.
A

—

cc. to: Dr.

Fink
Dr. Jos. S.A. Miller
Max

H.

Goldenberg, Ph.D.

�HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS,

N.Y.

geptember h, 1956.
Mr. George W. Galinger
170 East 79 Street
New York, New York

Dear ﬁr. Galinger:

is
Facilities".

a copy of the "Recommendations for Expansion of Research Space
and
This data has been compiled by Dr. Max Fink, who prepared an
original outline on the basis of the needs of the Department of Neurophysiology
and Neuropsychiatry, and on the basis also of a discussion with myself and with
the heads of the Departments of medicine and Biochemistry. The present draft also
was discussed in some detail at a special meeting of the Research Committee held
on Tuesday, August 28th.

Enclosed

I understand that

will refer these outlines, which include the main
functional uses to which thisnnew building will be put, to the architect. The
current plans are based on three floors of space (a basement and two floors)
with an approximate area of hO' x 100‘ for each floar. The data includes the
expected expansion during the next few years of the current projects of the
Department of Neurophysiology, the set-up and inclusion of a clinical laboratory,
projected space for dynamic and psychological research. The building plan should
include the possibility of establishing 12-20 interviewing or psychotherapy rooms
which would be housed on the first floor, either at the beginning of construction
or sometime later. Such space would be valuable in offering a replacement for the
present psychotherapy rooms used for in-patient psychotherapy and housed currently
on

you

the second floor of the Elizabeth Sloman Lowenstein Clinic Building.

where

Our

it

present plans are to leave the research and biochemistry department
presently is located, but to move the clinical laboratory into the new

research facilities.

If there is

any other data or clarification that you would 11g; from.n§;
the Research Committee or Dr. Fink, please feel free to communicate With me.~
Yours

JSAl-‘I:1b

encl.

sincerely,

Joseph S.A.Miller, M.D.
Medical Director

�TO:

DR.

1v .. 8-31-56

J.S.A.Miller

gear-1: Max

Fink,

q§UBJECT:

RECOMMENDﬁTIONS F R EXPANSIOT OF RESEARCB;§?ACE.

M.D.

“u.-

following recommendations for the development of facilities for research
summarize the consensus of meetings held by me with my staff; Dr. Miller, Dr.
ReCohen
and
the
to
Blumberg;
Dr.
Mr.
as
presented
Dr.
Bachrach,
Goldenberg,
search Committee of the Medical Board, at its meeting August 28, 1956, and apBoard
of Directors.
the
committees
of
the
them
to
for
appropriate
referral
by
proved
The

I,

INTRODUCTION:

A.) Eggatiggi - The major share of the work in the recommended facilities
who
and
are in the acute
be
with
patients
the
chiefly
population,
will
in-patient
services. For this reason, the research building should be in close proximity,
recommended
Lowenstein
for consideraBuilding.
Sites
Morris
the
to
attached
or
a3
LowenThe
Morris
between
the
include
order
area
the
in
ofusefulness,
tion,
stein Building and 76th Avenue;.b) The smaller area lying between the Morris
Loqenstein and Elizabeth Sloman Lowenstein Buildings, the connecting tunnel and
76th Avenue; and c) The field east of the Morris Lowenstein Building, and north
of the Israel Strauss Pavilion.

W

3.) Facilities: 1.) In the development of the Research Service, during the past

two

Anamet
have
been
various
by
measures.
temporary
the
space.requirements
years,
needs
the
for
reasonable
well
work
expansion
as
the
as
of
present
program,
lysis
next five years, has resulted in the following recommendations. The character of
the research program, at present, is along the lines of experimental psychiatry
and neurophysiology. Such a program requires neurophysiology laboratory space,
sound recording rooms, and special laboratory equipment as the first objective.

logical expansion of the research program.as
outlined by the Research Committee, by the development of a section in Clinical
Psychodynamic Psychiatry, the next need is for facilities for interviewing
patients and relatives; offices for staff members; and space for the observation
of the psychoﬂierapeutic interview. The latter should be capable both for the
observation of single patients and, also, groups.
3.) For the cooperation of staff members, conference rooms are needed.
These should be so placed and equipped that much of the interaction between staff
members will occur in that area.
b.) Another need lies in facilities for the 2h-hour physiologic observation of patients. A four-bed unit, next to the thSiOlogy laboratories,
will serve both as a recovery room for physiologic studies, as well as an observation unit for physiologic and biochemical studies.
2.) Keeping in

mind the

5.) Another recommendation is with regard to the potential growth
and utilization of the medical library. During the past few months, in which
we have had a librarian on a full-time basis, space in the library has beCome

�-2 '9

overtaxed. A major portion of the librarian's time is devoted to work in
conjunction with the Research Service. It would be advisable that pro—
vision be made in the same area of research expansion for the medical
library. Facilities for an adequate reprint file, and facilities for
microfilm reading are recommended.

6.) For

time, the present separation of the Medical Clinic
(in.Morris Lowenstein Building), the X—ray laboratories (in the Littauer
Building), and the @linical Chemistry Laboratories (in the Sloman Lowenstein
Building), has made adequate service cumbersome. It is recommended that the
Clinical Chemistry Laboratory be relocated in the Research Building, in
close proximity to the physiologic observation ward.
some

With the moving of the present neurophysiology offices from their
present position, on the first floor of the Morris Lowenstein Building to
the Research Building, three rooms adjacent to the present Medical Clinic
will be vacated. It is recommended that these rooms be converted to the
x-ray, fluoroscopy and radio~isotope laboratories of the Department of
Medicine. With the Research Building attached or in proximity to the
Morris Lonenstein Building, the present separated facilities will be

in close proximity.

Relocation of the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, from the Sloman Lowenstein to the Research Building, will free an additional 300 ft. of laboratory
space for the expansion of the Research Biochemistry Laboratories.

7.) In the history of the growth of this hospital, it is ap—
parent that the growth rapidly outstrips the projected allowances. In the
development of this building, it is recommended that provisions for expansion be provided in the initial designs, by ind.uding a foundation strong
enough for the addition of 100% of the Space; space for elevators; and
utility resources adequate for this type of expansion. Also storage space
rapidly outstrips the needs of the laboratories. For this reason, a recommendation is made that a basement storage, equal to 15% of the initial floor
area, be provided.

0.)

Name:

is inadvisable
'It"Laboratories"

to apply to this building or wing the

name

or "Experimental". To follow the traditions
"Research",
of the hospital, the name of a benefactor may he applied, or other non-

specific designation.
D.)

Research Beds:

item of research need is not recommended. That item is a
To
ward.
research
provide facilities for the continual observaspecial
tion of a large number of patients, separated, even in name only, from the
rest of the hospital group, would dilute to potentialities for the utilization of all other patients, as well as provide a psychologic barrier to
the experimental program. For the present, it is inadvisable to admit
One

patients for "research.".

�.3.
II.

.

GENERAL OUTIINE

0F SPACE RELOCATIQE:

Taking into account the available fUnds and the potentiality of additional Public Health Service support, a three-story building, approximately of
the size 100 ft. x no ft. is projected.

A.)

Basement: To include space for the following:

1.;
2.
3.)

h.)

Library stacks.
Storage Space.
Clinical Chemistry laboratory and offices.
Space for expansion of Chemistry Research laboratories.

include utilities,
enlarged to 5,000 sq. ft.).
(To

it

may

be advisable

to have the basement area

B.) Egret Floor:

l.)

waiting room - receptionist.

2. Medical library.
3. Large conference room.
Small
conference
room.
h.)
5. Offices and interviewing rooms - 12.

6.) Secretaryfs office and filing room.
C.) Second Floor:

1.)
2.)
3.)
h.)
5.)
6.)

III.

Neurophysiology laboratories - 2 - and central recording room.
Physiology observation ward.
Psychophysical laboratory.
Psychotherapy experimental laboratories - 2 - and central
sound recording room.
Four offices.
Small conference room.

SPECIFICATIOIB:

A.)‘.Taboratories:

l.)

Physiologic and Neurophysiologic Laboratory: Two rooms for
the simultaneous observation of two subjects should be placed about a central
third room, which will contain the physiologic recording equipment. In such a
system, single pieces of recording equipment can serve dual functions. Such rooms
should have independent facilities for temperature and humidity control. Initially,
the central equipment room will contain a single EEG unit; but space for a second
unit and a frequency analyzer should be allowed. The equipment room should contain
recording equipment capable of continuous, simultaneous observation of a number of
physiologic variables, such as blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and
galvanic skin reflex. The position of these three rooms should be in close proximity to the physiologic observation ward.

a.) Location - Second floor.
b.) Approximate size: each experimental

sq. ft.,
the equipment room of 180 sq. ft., with an adjoining
smaller repair laboratory of 120 sq. ft.
room of 150

�.h.
c.) Relationship
access to

and access: Each experimental room to have
the phySiology ward; and to the equipment room.

Equipment room to have large glass port into experimental
room. Port to slide into wall to allow direct communication between equipment and experimental rooms.

d.) Special construction:
(1) Individual temperature and humidity control for
experimental rooms.
(2) Sliding port.
(3) Double walls and ceiling for sound-proofing.
(h) water piping and sink in each experimental room.

2.) - Physiological Observation War ‘ Attached to the physiological laboratory, there should be a four-bed observation unit. Such a unit should
be equipped for the 2b hour study of patients for biochemical and hormonal studies.
A nursing unit should be provided, as well as storage
space for the medical equipment needed to protect patients who are under investigation.

a.) Location: second floor.
800 sq. ft.
Size:
b.)
c. Relationship and access: access from the main hall and
offices; as well as the two physiology laboratories.
d.) Special construction:
(1) Two two-bed units.
(2) Two lavatcries and one shower.
(3) opace for storage of clothes of patients; and nursing
equipment.
(h) Nurses station of desk, storage space, reirigerator
and 3 1m 0
(5) Doors wide enough

for stretchers or bed.

3.) - Esychophysical Laboratory: This laboratory should be equipped
for visual and tactile studies. he room should have windows with built-in light-

proof shutters, and the doors should be such that complete darkness can be achieved.
For a visual laboratory, the length should be at least 2h to 26 feet. This room
should have individual temperature and humidity control.

a.) Location: second floor.
250
Size:
Length
sq.
ft.
b.)
and
c. Relationship

should be 2h
access: access to the

logy equipment room and an office.

d.) Special construction:
El) Light-proof shutters

ft.

hall, the

and doors.
2) Individual temperature and humidity

control.

physio—

�-5h.

Psychotherapy Experimental Laboratory:
Sound Recording Unit.

For the proper observation of patient and therapist, two experimental
rooms about a central observation equipment room, should be provided. These rooms
should be sound-proof and isolated, preferably at the end of a hall, away from traffic . Lighting should be provided in experimental rooms so that filming of the
procedure can be done without additional lights. The central equipment room should
contain sound recording equipment which can be controlled either remotely from inside
the observation room or from the equipment room itself. A port should be provided
from the equipment room into each of the experimental rooms for filming. It would be
advisable that at least one of the two experimental rooms be of sufficient size to
permit a group of six or eight patients to be under continuous observation. Observation will go on from the central equipment room through one-way vision.windows.
should be possible to accommodate a large
By adjustable, one-nay vision mirrors,
group of observers in the large experimental room, to study the procedures in the
smaller experimental room, while recording is accomplished for the separate recording

it

room.

a.) Location‘ second floor (this facility may be placed
the first floor in exchange for officeS.)
b.) Size: three rooms:
(1) Experimental room, large - ZhO sq. ft.

on

(é) Experimental room, small - 100 sq. ft.
(3) Recording-observation room 150 sq. ft.
0.) Relationship and Access:
(1) Both experimental rooms are to have one-way ports from
the recording room.
(2) The large experimental room should have a one-way port
into the small experimental room.
(3) Access to hall from each experimental room and recording
'

room.
(h) Access from recording room

into large experimental room.

d.) Special Construction:
(1) Double walls, ceiling for soundproofing.
(2) One-way mirrors as in (c)

each
into
filming
Special
room.
experimental
port
(3;
(A Cable connections from each experimental room to
recording room.
(5) Loudspeaker connections from small experimental room

to large.

(6) Microphone location and outlets placed in original wall

brackets and fixtures.

5, Clinical Laboratory:

Relocation of the Laboratories for Clinical Chemistry in close proximity to
the physiology ward is advisable. The Clinical Laboratories should heprovided with
adequate benches for routine and special test procedures. In View of the space
recommendation for Research Biochemical Laboratories, it is advisable to locate the
Chemical Laboratories in the basement, with access bv open stairway to the first
floor reception room.

a.) Location:

basement near

stairwell.

b.) Size: 750 sq. ft.
c.) Access: from hallway in basement; to first floor reception
room and second floor laboratories through stairwell and
elevator.

�u6u

d.) Special construction:
(1) High ceiling to allow for hanging pipes and "false"
ceiling.
(2)'work benches, sinks, electrical, compressed air, hot
and cold water, gas outlets according to detailed specifications of biochemist.
6. Allowance for Expansion of Research Biochemistry:
1500-2000
recommended
that
is
allowances
of
the
this
In
building, it
expansion.
biochemistry
future
be
for
basement
incomplete,
of
left
area
sq. ft.
Such area should have higher than average ceiling to allow for the installation
of necessary piping.
B.

foice

Space:

Individual work space for each of the members of the research service
inpsychiatry
in
experimental
The
requirement
staff
be
present
should
provided.
and
two
provision
psychologists,
clﬁles two psychiatrists, a neurophysiologist,
and
additional
psychologist.
an
of
a
physiologist
addition
the
by
for expansion
into
would
requirements
I
space
picture
Clinical
Psychiatry,
In the section for
(anthropologist
scientist
social
two
a
psychologists,
clude three psychiatrists,
of
staff
makes
This
professional
a
total
worker.
and
a social
or sociologist),
One
three
persons.
1h. In addition, the secretarial services will require
in
she
act
also
receptionist
as
a
can
such
that
be
in
a position
secretary should
secretarial
Additional
of
offices.
section
the
of
entrance
the
a waiting room at
adv
In
be
where
records
will
kept.
section
and
filing
help should be in an office
pre-docresearch
fellows,
for
be
aside
set
two
additional
officesashould
dition,
research
the
with
who
become
associated
medical
students
may
toral psychologists or
nrqgram.
be
the
on
to
first floor,
largely
is
office
Location:
space
a.)
with some on the second.

b.) Size:
1.) Offices of
2.)
3.)

c.)

Access

1.)

2.)
3.)

ft.

are recommended.
Sixteen are required for the fourteen provisional
personnel and two additions.
A waiting roomplSO sq. ft.
A large secretarial office for two secretaries and
filing space - 150 sq. ft.
and Relationship:
Twelve offices on the first floor, each with access to.
two
of
sets
leave
advisable
be
to
may
a hallway. It
offices with an inter-connecting door for the administration heads of the two psychiatric sections.
The reception room should be at the entrance to the
and
staircommand
the
hallway
through
and
access
unit
case with the basement, second floor and all offices.
The

10x12 or 120 sq.

secretarial office should

be located close to the

reception room.
d.) §pggial construction:
Double walls and ceiling to establish privacy for the
patients under observation.

�C.) - Conference

Room:

important element in any research unit is a place where various
A
conference room so
and
discuss
activities.
their
workers can get together
This
would
be
workers
most
the
of
be
would
for
ideal.
central
placed that it
would prevent the use of one office, the lihary or a laboratory for group disand
slides
films; blackThere
be
for
should
projecting
provisions
cussions.
boards for discussions; and space for exhibits of projects under study.
An

A

second small conference room should be provided for similar purpose on

the second floor.

a.) Location: first floor for large
small.

room; second

floor for

180 sq. ft. and 120 sq. ft.
Access and Relationship}
(1) The large room should have access from the

b.)Size:

c.)

library.

(2) The small room needs access only from the

hall

and

hall.

centrally located on floor.
d.) Special construction: facilities for slide-projection,
blackboards, and exhibition space allocated on two walls
Both should be

of the room.

D.)

- Medical Library!

present Medical Library contains one thousand volumes. In
Committee
has been aware that the library
the
the
Library
assessing
collection,
be
obtained
during
volumes
thousand
will
that
one
approximately
by
deficient
is
the next two years. In addition, considering the number of journals now in subadded
and
texts
are
that
number
neurologic
of
and
the
psychiatric
scription,
hundred
hundred
four
to
of
three
the
rate
at
of
a
the
expansion
library
annually,
volumes per year is anticipated. In addition, the Library Committee anticipates
For
and
these
micro-cards.
micro-film
both
the
use
recommending that
library
removed
of
the
is
location
library
the
the
that
present
well
fact
as
reasons, as
from the main activities of both the resident and research staffs, it is recommended that space for the library be provided; the Space to be divided into a
main reading room; small librarian’s work room; and library stacks.
The

a.) Location:
1.) The main reading

room

to be

on the

first floor, The

preferably near the entrance to the building.
librarian's work room to be off the main reading room.
2.) Library stacks to be in the basement, preferably
under the main library.

b.) Size:
c.)

Main reading room
Librarian work room
Basement stacks:

900 sq.
100 sq.
750 sq.

ft.
ft.
ft.

Access and Relationship: The main reading room to have
access from the hall and from the large conference room.
The work room is to come off the main.reading room. The
stacks to have access from the basement hallway.

�.8d.) Special construction: In the main reading room, bookcases for current books, journal racks for current
journals; special equipment for microfilm reading.
Also a mechanical dumb-waiter to connect library and
the stacks.
E.) -;§nimal Laboratories:
Present studies on steroid metabolism, the role of cholinesterase and
acetylcholine, and the need for some experimental work on the threshholds of convulsions,hsve made me feel that facilities for animal studies diould be provided.
The space presently allocated in the Sloman Lowenstein Building is satisfactory;
and part of the funds allocated for this expansion should be utilized to equip

that space.

F.)

~

Storage Space:

Storage space for patient records, laboratory data and equipment,
should be provided. Such space should be considered in the basement. Minimal
allocation of 500 sq. ft. for the laboratories is suggested.
G.) - Egpansion:
._
Allowance should be made in the planning of this building, for the
addition of a third and fourth floors. For this reason, an elevator well should be
included in the original designs, as well as boiler and other facilities with expansion possibilities to accommodate doubling the original ﬂoor space.
an

Furthermore, to accommodate laboratories on the basement floor,

extra-high ceiling is recommended.

Also, construction of the foundation and supporting structures
should be such as to accommodate the increase in floor space.

�ham”.

nus-an 1.
\

um.

um.

”a.
“it.
W 1.. Ida. nun.
mu

m
u:

hm,

mm.

may M.
Wm

m
mm

mm

loam-moan

WWW

Wt

W
W
mm
mrmmmm

w

WMﬂmmWW—Mtuwrtw

“Wauﬂ'mpmmmtummtdw

wwnamuupumautwmmuaawtotm

www.mm‘wm
(NW)M
WKIWMaWOWnM.dWW-ofm

Mgwmnmmammwmmm
ﬁmﬁanﬁhﬂdWWﬂrﬁuwﬂnﬂmdm-u
Mummmuwmmmmmmmn

morn-nan—

mwtmﬂnmmummwmmmummm
amm.wmtuuuammmmuuwotmmm
mush-Item.
mmumunmumpm. hummhrm»
mmmwsumm-mmww
M.Mawmmm,mmnwxmtw

m

4W¢mmmmwaamuwmmnummm

ammuatmmzsmmxmmwmmmm

�at.

mm,nr.umm,mupmmmmwtuummo

mmmWWmm-mmmmm
muumuuunabmrmmmmmuotomMW
mWﬂudWthMWWqum
MWm‘unumm-hxmmmwunmm
smtormpmamwmrmuummuu
oftthMmbugml,rwthmm,atth-W

Mmmby’mlmmmnuammwamms.

Wtdmmmunmmg.uvmmmrm

“cannula.
1)

mg
m. mu

5». My mum

th-

inner 0W

mm m
mm
mmimwimmummwm
mm: '.)mm¢pmmmmwummnmm
:..

mu of name «when.

Wmmmgmmwumanumbmmm
mmmmmammnnmnumimaw-

WW¢)WIWMWWM¢
Mﬂummnlefmub-ummw
muummmmmm.mmma
mmmmmamumamm. amen
mammummwmtwwmmmw
but]: “an,
with!“
wW
who
m33-99mm

W
ammwumwmmm
with

Dr.

mmmummm.m.mmmaumd
«mums mum-Mp

m'mpmwwwmum

�EWIM,BIIQWMMWWWW&amp;
dun-«mam. MWMtuumummmmh

mmwmmu.mum.uuwm
mmmmmmmummmuuaum

was
gonna
«an,
am
um.
'm' mm We
Wet-1mm.” m'mmmmtnmmpomtm; a:

mammmmtmummmmrmmu

mumut‘mwmmsmmamwmmm
for «m of
than «humans an mm a
mm.
mm
'Oc—uumﬁ
Mun
mm min
tho

WW
h‘mrmaehmmmwuwunm
on

MW.M,£Wam&amp;quwuunm,
mmaWwMu-Wuuummw.mdam
In

ammummmmmuwaunmm
mmuunrﬂmmnmmamw
“swam-mum”.
hawtdmum,mwrmmwwam
mmmuchmmmothauu-u
ammmm,umahmmmuanmw
It m
pa-mpucu.
u'

,3.
aw
1m,
M
mmmumwwmmxmmmrorwm

mum,

1-

mmmﬁ'wma MWuotmmﬂw-IW

uwgmmmmmmpmmmm.
mum-mwummmmnwptm.

m.mm..ammcammmawmmuwm

“MIMOIWMWMWRMVW

�mumnuumgmam,mmzmwwm
Wench-taunt. wmmnmmmimmra
Mum. mmummmewmudmmw
M
mmwempmuummw.
wmtmum¢wruwmmumummm
mama-untanmumnmmmwuiu
mwuummmmummnm;

mum
WWWWW”W¢WWG£W
MW

nmmumswdmwp

3)

amummmuummmmurummmm

Wu-mdmmmmmyauum-mm
Wish-Macadam

wmmuthothwuw.
mumﬁmﬁmmmueh-mmamwwm
autumn-um. mmmmwmmmmumum
Mrmdmmutemx ramgmmmamw
methunsctmmm,uMaW
mmmummwummw.
qudncqleudmmudwwmw
MIIMWMtatMofmﬁmm.‘l-Wm
thathﬂdethuuw-mofamW
uwummw,mmmmummgm.mm

WuMMWMﬂWﬂwm-IM'

mg
m
muamummuuwammmmmqnanwm.
a)

3;,

WV

,

,

u a 1mm

mmmdnmmnhmm,u.muuummtm

W. Mummm,rm m
hMﬂnMdemWMIWWy
a

to

�cps.

mmumunwwm.mmmnmmmb
minim.
Waughammnmuumwnmm

mmwmnummwm.uuurmuwma
www.mhmmwummmmmum-m

mdmanMWWh
mg

m
mm:
mm:wm.mwmmmmm.mam
5)

1:11 w

”5

In

an

as:

m

wwummwmmm1mmmwm
mmamwotwwmmvawpmm

�mammmmw.

11mm

”MS.
ll.
Illa.
luminary!“
nah!”
£0»... 5'

8.3.11.1“

1956.

mangromunumm

Mum: mu;
Wmmuommrm
«a 1mm”: sauna.
suntan.
mam

13W 8, 1956.

mm mum.

m mum
manuswu
1956.
158.
can.
1'
mm; mm, m We}...

3) Fink.

a.

m mu,

of mm

8. I»:

W

Wmommmw
«Wag muatmmmmumo:

Mikhandnmma

Wu.

luv

W

Ion, Duo-bu 5.

m 0-. at

2956.

\

_

W.
W
(W4
m.
W)
a.
0mm.»
Woman.
Harem
m.
m,
W.
«3.1..

um,

H. A...

0mm am»

Duondou and

’0

27.31. 1956.

1.:
5;:

an.
am.

a.

W4
mm
M
W

196-198, 1956,

magma;

umm Nation
at. tho
April
meutmc 3m,

nimnohundMH.»
am

mummung

or

5'11", 4.: Eamon-onto;
15. 1956.

in

mum u

we:

1956.
Juo
1.
an.
1.1... m.u.
to» to caucu-

m.

19: 2349. 1956.

in

ac

memmmwm
mama: mm,

ham-n

w

In!

alumnus
in

mumatmmm

mm,

Arch.

hard. a mum...

�«ﬂu

mama‘md
mm, Wntmmmmmmm

m) v3.1.3.2. I...

n)

Hahlhandm. a.»

1353.415. 1956.

Kuhn.

a. I...

an.

13)

I.- 1m

m.
“91.31., mi mm, In

me... n. mm.

mu.

a

mm
3.

we.»

m.

15)

nu.
'

'

1956.

«me
Imam.
13mm:
w
i.
W.

Pm-

ram-m7 Na. 1956.

“Mum.

nattbuhéandﬁb

mum. 4.1:). Wu.

39W.._1956. (van:
n. 3.: rumm- a!

J. mount... 31:

13)

we:
mm.
mum-manna“;

mean

3.1;...

WWW
m it.
Wen my,
at.

12)

1..

H.

1956.

a

a.

may, a. 3.).

and

(um

in

1.

am Mm, m.

man).

may,
396. 1956. (with
x. m Ian“, 3.).
“3.3.1.“ Wmmsmmmmmmum a.
(um. mm. 2.1.
mad-n.
mum up... 2: 290-301,
0.).
m.n.uammmr,a.i
mlmmofchmgumm
ml...
W.

R. I»: ‘Gantahuhucn

m,

a

sum

$215836

Prom-I,

A.

-

and

1956,

@.

16)

and

Sam u ham-«at in

1956.
11)

and
I.
am.
hunt.

mu. m

13)

um,

n.

68-03. 1956,
15.,

mm,

1...:

W.

hum...

"a”

m.

‘,‘~

a. m

5.

and

an",

W,
a.
a.

«Whammwrwmmamm
no»... 2:
51.17, 1956.

35;: 68-96.

man: «mm mm.” (*hntmﬁm').

(we: mummy,
A.

Cont.

"

K.

In
.1.

3.).

mun

3mm.

�October 3, 1956
I‘m‘iORflrﬂJm‘E

22; medical Affairs Committee
ESE:

Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller

Subject:

Report of Research Service, Second Year

-

To

September 1, 1956

At the request of the Medical Affairs Committee Chairman, I am sub.
mitting this report of the Research Service, describing its activity during its
second year. During this year, the staff has increased; we renewed our grants
with the U.5.J.H.S. and through the efforts of members of the Board of Directors,
received grants from the Kaufmann and Dazian Fbundations; and we were encouraged
by the results in our electroshock evaluation, reserpine and chlorpromazineinsulin, and anbivalence studies.

distressing feature of the year was the denigratration of the Research Service to separate services without a Director. As of September 1, 1956,
the Research Service is divided into a Section of Experimental Peychiatry (under
my direction); a Section of Clinical (Psychodynamic) Psychiatry, to be created;
a section of Biochemistry headed by Dr. H. Geldenberg; and a section of Internal
Medicine unfer Dr. Cohen's direction. 'Uhile there is some theoretical justification for such a development in a large institution, the development here has
led to a diapersicn of activities and a lack of adequate supervision of ongoing
One

activities.

high note at the end of this year has been the recommendation by
the Board of Directors that the Ford Foundation funds be allocated to relieving
the space problems of the Research tervice. Following this recommendation, and
after discussion with interested members of the hospital staff, I drew up a
basic program for the Research Building. This program was approved by the Research Committee of the Medical Board at its meeting on August 28, 1956, and is
now in the hands of the hospital architect.
A

A.

PROGREjs l§*9HGOING PROJECTS

l.

Electroshock.Evaluation.Proaec

: We

have completed

Electroshock Project # 3 which demonstrated the dependence of the rating of improvement following electroshock on the patient‘s personality; as well as elicited definite
measures of language changes which were correlated with improvement.

result of these studies, we instituted a "control" study, designed to validate our hypotheses. we are new in the midst of this study, which
will continue until spring, 1957.
As a

believe that we now understand the neurophysiologic, personality
and psychologic factors in electroshock therapy. Our data has both prognostic
and theoretical significance; and I plan to present a definitive report before
the American Psychiatric Association in may,.1957.
We

presented the language changes in electroshock to the American Psychopathological Association; the EEG changes to the Eastern LEG Society;
and will present a report entitled "Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function
we have

�92-

to Behavioral Change lolloning Electroshock" to the Divisional A.P.A. meeting
in November, 1956. Reports of the memory changes, amobarbital test and EEG
changes in electroshock have already appeared in press.
T?

Meanwhile, as part of the resident training program, we have encouraged
a senior resident, Dr. Harold Esecover, to undertake a study of the type of psychotherapy which is best suited to different types of electroshock patients.

Furthermore, as a consequence of data presented at the American ELG
Society in June, I have devoted considerable time to an elucidation of the biochemical changes underlying electroshock. Such reading has led me to elaborate
a theory of the relationship of acetylcholine and cholinesterase in blood and
spinal fluid to electroshock results. nith the cooperation of Dr. Goldenberg,
this study will be added to the ongoing control electroshock study.

(a) Thorazine - Insulin:
The control study instituted
a year ago has continued with dramatic results. To date hS patients have been
studied, 22 on Thorazine and 23 on insulin. All were insulin coma condidates.
The thorazine group has demonstrated a higher improvement rate, and a lower
refusal and complication rate than the insulin patients. we are impressed by
this data and plan to complete the study by the end of the year, for presentation to the staff.
2. Drug Evaluation ﬁfudies:

(b) Reserpine: See "com.

pleted projects."

(c) Anectine- Electroshock:
Continuing our studies of paralytic agents in electroshock, we utilized a technic for administration of anectine devised by ur. William Karliner of the Attend.
ing staff. ’Ue found it most useful and safe and the results prompted us to
recommend the adoption of this technic for our unit.‘
This study, undertaken by Dr.
Tarachow, has been successful in
defining enmivalence in operational terms, i.e., by the tests used to measure
A summary of the two
years work is being presented to the staff on Octit.
ober 7th.

3. émhiyalence Study:

In addition to Dr. Tarachow, Dr. H. Korin has beenzactive in this
project; and recently, under the resident training program, a senior resident,
Dr. Stanley Friedman, has been assigned to the project.

h. Commlication Studies: Aided by the grant from the

Foundation, Dr. J. Jaffe
has devoted this year to developing ways of measuring the verbal interaction between doctor and patient. To do this, he records his interviews with patient
before and after periods in which he modifies his attitude to the patient. At
one time he says little, later he may re-enforce the patient's positive (or
negative) comments. By noting changes in language, rate of speech and in mood,
Dr. Jaffe has developed an index of communication change.
Kaufmann

�-3...

present, he is testing the validity of his scoring methods, and
plans to apply them to doctor-patient interviews in the near future.
At

In addition, with Dr. Kahn, 3r; Jaffe has explored the possibility of
other technics, as sentence completion tests and the reading of'a standard parab
graph under conditions of immediate feed-back as measures of changes in commun-

ication patterns.

5. Autonomic Reactivity: In his

initial studies,

Dr. Blum»

berg demonstrated that the class;
ification of patients according to their blood pressure response to mecholyl was
meaningful for our population. He then applied the test to the patients on the
reserpine study, and noted a consistent and persistent lowering of blood pressure
11th an a-..
increase in the mecholyl response Iuring the period of reserpine action.

w“.

Host significant, however, has been his studies of the electroshock
He
has studied 100 patients, and established celrelations of their mechgroup.
olyl reactivity with age, diagnosis, and therapeutic result. He concluded that
the mecholyl responsivity is directly related to age - and that this is the determining factor, more than the primary illness. He is describing his observations in the forthcoming Israel Strauss Volume of the Journals

a consequence of these studies, he has recommended, and the Research Committee has approved, a study of better ways of measuring blood pressure;
and a collaborative biochemical venture (with
Goldenberg) inDC the chanes
As

.

r.

in adrenalinenoradrenalin in the blood.

6. Biochemistgy: (a) Steroid Sulfate Coniugates: As indicated earlier, the steroid studies were
undertaken because these hormones are known to be implicated both in the physiological response to stress as well as in the sexual processes. Three impartand observations have been made in the Hillside Hospital Laboratory. First,
has been noted that the steroids, which are manufactured by the adrenal and
it
sex glands, are converted in the liver to water-soluble steroid sulfate conjugu
ates. Since this is one of the major forms whereby the sex hormones are elim»
inated from the body (via urine), the liver evidently plays an important role
in maintaining hormonal balance. A second discovery in this area was made by

comparin“ male and female rat liver activity. Female rat liver was found to be
remarkably active in conjugating the steroids, particularly the male hormnnes.
This means that the female animal possess- a regulatory device whereby she
maintains her ielaleness by preierentic.lly excreting the male hormone which,
incidentally, are present in both senes.

s

Finally, in the first group of 18 normal human
observed that urinary steroid sulfate output is
a) so::-linked, being tnice as high in males as
b) appears to be low in value for calm people,
whoare innately tense, excitable, prone to

controls

it has

been

in females, and
but rises in subjects
anxiety.

(b) Psvchotomimetic and szchotherapeutic
Dru;s“
: Thesecond preject in the laboratory involves a study of the possible role of hallucinogens in the development
of mental disease. It has been hypothesized that indole-like compounds, comparable to LSD, acrenochrome, or a.crenolutine may be formed in vivo as a result
of faulty metabolism and give rise to the $3.rmptoms commonly.associated with the
psychoses. Initial studies in Our laboratory have failed to detect these alkalw

,

�.u.
oidal products in patient's urine. Ebssibly this is due to a poor choice of
patients, since none were actively hallucinating.

it

of
the
the
most
proportion
that
greater
likely
appears
suSpected alkaloids would be excreted in changed form, and very likely via the
feces. r‘his is suggested by metabolic studies which we have carried out to
is administered in known quantity.
determine shat happens to mescaline when
unaccounted
The
5%
the
rest
is
urine.
in
unchanged
comes
about
through
Only
carbon
diobe
A
as
of
expired
course
carbon
residues
might
of
the
portion
for.
LSD
the
isotope
the
drug.
in
would
account
not
nitrogen
for
xide, but this
hence
excretion
the
of
in
drug
accumulation
gut,
this
indicate
studios in Jurope
studies
For
subsequent
these
reasons
our
here.
seems
also
feces
the
likely
in
However,

it

will involve isotopically—labelled hallucinogens to determine their ultimate
decould
more
then
we
intelligently
these
at
our
facts
disposal,
Having
fate.
termine the excretion of related compounds by psychotics.

(c) 92lorpromazine project; Studies on
the metabolism of chlorpromazine by
psychotics were reported earlier, at which time chlorpromazine, chlorpromazine
were
derivative
alkaloidal
and
unidentified
an
chromogen,
the
purple
sulf Xide,
demonstrated in urine. A sufficient quantity of the last compound could not be
and
the project
conventional
methods,
by
identification
from
for
urine
isolated
was held up in April pending receipt of a continuous flow electrophoresis unit.
This item has been on order for h months but has not yet come in.
7. Tactile Perception: Following the technics devised by
Dr, Bender, Dr. Green and myself,
we have, with U.S.P.H.S. support, set up studies of tactile perception using
simultaneous threshold electrical stimuli. Patients have been studied before
and during electroshock. To date, the data amply demonstrates that the phenom!
ena of extinction, displacement and confabulation, noted clinically in childin
all
elicited
readily
are
cerebral
with
dysfunction,
and
organic
ren
patients
induced
the
organ—
with
electroshock,
Furthermore,
threshold
levels.
at
subjects
ic cerebral changes exaggerate the perceptual errors in identifiable patterns.
This study is continuing and it is planned to present the data before the appropriate neurologic societies.
'

8. Prognostic EngiCatorg g: glectrgshgggg This study,

designed by Dr.
Karliner to elucidate the relation between presenting symptoms and the results
of electroshock therapy, is continuing. Forty-five patients have been studied,
and it is anticipated that the results will be determined in the coming weeks.

�.5.
B.

COMPLETED PROJECTS:

collaborative study of
the urinary steroid pattern
changes with electroshock has been discontinued. The initial findings demonstrated a significant alteration in the steroid patterns after electroshock in
improved patients. After studying these results, Dr. Hellman of the SKI and
I prepared a protocol of experimental drug administration designed to clarify
these findings.
1. Sloan Ketterinr Study:

The

presentation of this protocol to the Research Committee, it was
their recommendation that, despite the merits of the research design, it not be
approved for this hospital. The chief criticism was one of the risk to the pat.
Upon

ient of the procedure.

these studies could not be meaningfully carried out at the hospital, the program.has been transferred to Creedmcor State Hospital, where the
cooperation of the Medical Director and the Commissioner of Mental Hygiene of
New York has been assured.
As

2. subculture:

project has been discontinued following the initial reports of the study group.
hour observation of a patient, islaeing prepared
The

primary study, that of a 2h
for the Research Committee by Dr. R. Navarre.
The

3. Reserpine Egalyation:

The high-dose reserpine evaluation study was completed in

harsh. The results demonstrated a limited usefulness of this drug in our population. Hhile it occasionally controlled overactivity, it did not reduce the
symptom of anxiety; and did increase existing feelings and states of depression.
The results were reported in the April issue of the Journal and summarized for
the administrator and staff in memoranda and meetings in April. As a result,
reserpine was made part of the hospital formulary, with specific recommendations
for its limited use.
C

.

PROJECTS Fulﬁl-ED:

0*.“

1. Cerebral Reactivity: In the course of our studies cf
electroshock, we have been imp
pressed by the differences in brain responsivity to electroshock. Some patients
show a quick and intense change in behavior and on our tests; while others require more frequent treatments, higher voltages, etc. to induce any change.
u

developed a series of hypotheses which ascribe the differences
in reactivity to (a) biochemical differences in acetylcholine-cholinesterase
metabolism; (b) personality differences; and (c) generalized hypo-responsivity
to all stresses. For this purpose, we are now elaborating protocols to test
these hypotheses. As developed, they will be submitted to appropriate granting agencies for support.
we have

2. Autonomic Reactivity: See "Ongoing ProjectS."

�3. Digghemistrv: Following the present studies it is
planned to continue the studies of bio-

chemical changes in mental

steroifs sulfate excretion

illness along the following lines.
end

a) Comprehensive survey of urinary

its relation to anxiety.

b) Circulating steroid sulfate

levels in blood and spinal fluid.

c) Enzymic and fluorometric evaluation of alkaloids excreted in feces, with particular reference to patients
who are hallucinating.

Cholinesterase and acetylcholine
levels in spinal fluid of patients undergoing electroshock therapy (as part of
the electroshock evaluation study).
d)

D.

STAFF CHANGES

essential change during this period has been the reorganization
of the hospital‘s research activities. As of SepteMber, 1956, the Section of
Experimental Psychiatry, which is one of the surviving sections of the Research
Service, consists of the following:
The

Dr. N. Fink

D?,

-

J, Jaffe

Dr. R. Kahn
Dr. H. Karin
Dr. H. Green

Research Associate
Research Assistant~Psychiatry
Sr. Research Assistant-Psychology
Research Assistantufsychology
Research Assistant-Neurophysiology

and a full
(Mrs. H. Hosquera).

time secretary (Miss Gayle Iankel) and 2/5

-

time

EEG

technician

chief addition has been the addition of the EEG technician and
the part time appointment of Dr. M. Green. For the present, and until December
1957
As
of
January
somatic
the
1,
Green
ﬁlerapies.
Dr.
1956,
supervising
is
31,
he will devote all his time at Hillside to experimental work.
The

E.

FUNDS:

for 1956-57 have been received from the U.S.P.H.S. From the
National Institute of Mental Health, support for Dre. Kahn and Karin, in the
electroshock evaluation study, and for biochemical studies in the relation of
alkaloids to mental disease. Also, from the National Institute of Arthritis,
funds for the study of steroid sulphates, now used to support one research
Grants

chemist (Hrs. Ruth Foley).

Also, a small grant from the Dazian Foundation supported the summer
employment of a chemist; while the Kaufmann Foundation has been supporting the
studies of Dr. J. Jaffe.

�I are planning to submit an application
for support of the studies in cerebral reactivity; while Hrs. Blumberg and
Miller are submitting one for their studies in autonomic reactivity. Both reAt present, Dr. H. Green and

quests are to

go

to the U.S.P.H.S. before
F.

OTHER

November

1, 1956.

ACTIVITIES

l.

hedical Library: In mic-1955, the hospital obtaineo
the services of a part-time 1110(l0a1
librarian. By the year's end, it was apparent that the acecuate utilization
of our library required a full time librarian, anc as of March 1956, miss Rosalind Lazarus was apppointed. I was appointed chairman of the Library Committee,
and through our joint efiorts, the medical library was activated. A definitive
budget was prepareC and approved; rules for library use established; and more
recently, a 2000 volume addition to the library was recommended to bring this
library up to the standard as the most complete psychiatric library in the North
Shore area.
of the Journal of the Hillsidee“
2. Israel gtreuﬁg_folune
S
ervice
Research*
m&lt;.1d3ers
o;t
of
the
the
By
active
aith Dr.
cooperation
HosEital:
S. Tarachov 3 the volume was orranized and editec. It is new in the hence of
the printer and fill appear in November, 1956.
3

3.

Isreal Strauss hemorial Lecture:

The appointment

of

the second lecturer,

Dr. Hilliam Halamud, an” the detailed arrangements for the lecture were made
by the Committee headed by Dr. Bender, with the active cooperation of members
of the Research Service.

Research Builcing: Following the recommendation of
the Board of Directors, the members
of the Research Service were most active in planninf the new structure; describA.

The
and
the
for
architect.
relationships
descriptive
ing its uses;
establishing
first blueprints were submitted and after considerable discussion, were returned

with corrections. Continued liason with the architect is planned.

5. Resident Training: During the past year, members of
the Research Service gave bimonthly
seminars on recent advances in psychiatric research. Two special lectures were
arranged; and the local Research Conference of the Nassau Heuropsychiatric Society'nas held at Hillside Hospital.
Respectfully submitted,

Mfﬁgw

Fink, M.D.
Research Associate
(bxperimental Psychiatry)

Max

�ﬁ—

-

Methods
New
Reports
.For Evaluating Electroshock
Hosﬁpifali

W
.

.

thropies, is engaged in a number of investigations into the
basic causes and treatment of
mental ailments.
Dr. Maximilian Fink, research associate at Hillside,
said that electroshock actual1y Fan change the way the
braln functions, and that
these Changes can be observed
and measured by electroencePhalography.
The change' in the brain also,
shows itself in the response to
dru es, M
s cholo gical testin e
and the weakening of unpleasant memories.
The Hillside researchers report new and definite methods
for measuring the extent of
these changes. In the successfully treated electroshock patient, these brain changes
enable the person to maintain
better control over his emotions and behave more like a
normal person.

An' important clue to how'to identify patients less likely
electric shock therapy affects to benefit from electroshock
the human brain has been un- so that they can be treated
covered by researchers at Hill- earlier by other methods.
side Hospital, Glen Oaks, it The electrOShock developwas announced today.
ment was described in the Hillisannual
report
side
Hospital
is
It expected that this discovery will increase the ability sued todayvto select patients most likely Hillside, a non-profit mental
to benefit from electroshock. hospital affiliated with the
This development also will help Federation of Jewish Philan‘

ll

llIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

.

For Free. Fast Delivery
On These Money-Savers

MARSLANO'S

C‘d’

I

I

REpuhho 9-6162

2:;

E

lllllllllllllllll|lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll||lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

‘

gnuIlllllllllllllllllllllllll

;

m

IllIllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllIlll|llll|lllllI|llllIlll|lllllllllIllllllIIIll|llllllllllllllllllmt

CLARK 8. CLIFFORD

"Black label"

B LEN DED
'

,"

‘

.

"

j

.

I,

I

,

'

t
4

H I SKEY

'

.‘

FULL

,

.

,3

,

.

.

&amp;

A

QUART

5.00 Value!

This is our tastest seller because it's such
“ excellent quality at such a fabulously low
price . . . a full quart for less than the
cost of a fifth! 30% straight whiskies
4' 5' 6 and 7 years old; 70% grain he“.
"a! SP'“*" 8" Pr°°£
‘

i

V

‘

3 QUARTS—‘l 1.75 0 CASE or

12—4650

.

r

nolh§§§£§§ZXt°£atlt°2§§§i§ 31;:

HEAR-OLD "MITCHELL" MARYLAND

RYE

patient to benefit more readily
from psychotherapy administered during and after the

.

tcourse of electroshock.

.tElectroshock therapy will
continue to be used in the
treatment of depressions occurring in patients in the 30
-to 60-year age groups, and
also in younger schezophrenics
showing mainly excitement
or stupor as symptoms.
In issuing the report, Dr.
Joseph s. A. Miller, medical
director, also presented the
following data about the
year’s activities at the hospital.
Among 575 patients treated
during the year, the average
length of hospitalization was
176 days. Of_ these, 32 patients were admittﬂd t0 the
Israel Strauss Adolescent Pavilion, a facility for adolescent
girls; which was founded in
October, 1954. The out-patient
service treated 224 patients.

‘

——~—

�.

following day-

BERNETHY—Elnia 1... on October 30,
1956. wife of the late Richard 3.. beloved mother at Gertrude Tobias and
1Estelie Abcrnethy.
ervices Thursday, November lst. 8:30 P.
M. at the Clarence F. Simonson Funeral
gall-[EL 1119-04 Hillside avenue. Richmond
ntermeni‘ Friday. 1]. A. M. Maple Grove
Cemetery.lALICCHlO—Raifaele, on October 30. 1956.
of 101-28 99 stret, Ozone Park, beloved
husband of Marianna, dear father of
.Vincent and Florence. dear brother of
Carmine. also survived by eight grand—
l
children.
Leposmg at the Cassese .Funeral‘ Home,
Inc.. 101-07 101 avenue, Ozone Park.
Funeral Saturday, 9:15 A. M. Solemn
requiem high mass St. Mary Gate of
Heaven
aterment St. John’s Cemetery.
IHRISTENSEN—Chauncy J., on October 30,
1956, after a long illness, belov‘ed husband of Amelia.‘ devoted father of the
late Dorothea C. Herold. loving grandfather of Barbara and Richard Herold.
‘uneral from the Walter B. Cooke Funeral
Home. 158-14‘ Northern boulevard. Flushing L. 1. Friday, 3 P. M.
nterment Cedar Grove Cemetery.
URClo—Lena. on October 28. 1956, of
73-11 Metropolitan avenue. Middle Village. devoted wile of Carl. loving mother
oi Salvatore and Joseph.
Leposing at the Phillips Funeral Home.
79-02 Metropolitan avenue. Middle Village. Funeral Friday at 10 A. M. Solemu mass of requiem at st. Margaret's
R. C. Church at 10:30 A. M.
nterment st. John's Cemetery.
“NAN—Elizabeth. on October 29. 1956. beloved wife of William. mother oi Lulu
Harrington and Mary Mattoe; also survived by two great-grandchildren.
teposing at the Walsh Funerar Home.
94-08 118th street. Richmond Hill. Services Friday. 1 P. M.
nterment Mount Olivet Cemetery.
HEDGE—Catherine V.. of 585 Seneca avenue. Ridgewood. on October 30. 1956.-age
66 years, beloved mother of Walter.
Joseph, Madeline, Frances Connell, Mary
Jo. (Dolly) Connell. devoted sister of
Ellen O'Loughlin, also survived by four
grandchildren.
’uneral Saturday. 9 A. M. from Charles
Morton Funeral Home. 578 Onderdonk
avenue, Ridgewood. Solemn requiem mass
St. Brigid’s R. C. Church. 9:30 A. M. e
nterment St. John’s Cemetery.
lAY—Laurance X, Staff Sgt. U.S.A.F..
suddenly at Carlisle. Mass. on Saturday.
October 27, 1956. beloved husband of
Patricia A. (nee Joerger). devoted father
of Donna Patricia. Laurance and Kevin
Gay, dear son of Lorraine and Margaret
,Gay. loving brother of James. Jere.
Patricia Papscun.
Marguerite
Clay.
Jeanne-Marie Dalessandro. and the late
Lorraine Edwina Gay.
uneral from the Gleason Funeral Home.
10-25 150th street. Whitestone. N. Y.
on Friday. November 2nd. at 10:30 A. M.
Solemn requiem mass st. Luke’s R. C.
Church at 11 A. M.
utennent United States National Cemetery,
Pinelawn. L. I.
lATCH—Helen Frances. on October 29.
1956. beloved wife of the late Lewis.
devoted mother of Ruth E.
ervices at Walter B. Cooke Mineral Home.
goaOSrgdena avenue. Brooklyn, Wednesday,
'

,

.

'

,

:iterment Walkill Valley Cemetery. Walden.
New York.
lAVERLY—Joseph. of 60-27 78 avenue.
Ridgewood. on October 28. 1956. age 76
years. beloved father of Joseph. Jr..
Henry and Robert Haverly. Catherine
Anastasia. Lucy Corrado. Lillian Caverler. Marie Roethel: also survived by 28
grandchildren and nine great-grandchildren.
uneral Friday. 9:30 A. M. from Charles
Morton Funeral Home. 578 Onderddnk
avenue. Ridgewood. Solemn requiem mass.
10 A. M at st. Matthias R. C: Church.
nterment St. Charles Cemetery. Pinelawn.
Long Island.

sum":

non

Until 5:39

in «m... or

I. IL Satori-y

llliib‘S—Mai‘ie (nee Gademann). on Octoher 30, 1956. beloved wife of Edward
Heiss. devoted mother of Carol Elizabeth.
Nancy Edwina and Bruce Edward G.
Heiss..deai sister of Frances. of Regen—
burg, Germany, loving daughter of Reinhold and Francisca Koob of Munich.
Reposing at the Leo F. Kearns Funeral
Home. 61-40 Woodhaven boulevard at
Dry Harbor road, Rego Park. Funeral
Friday, 9:30 A. M. Solemn requiem mass
at our Lady of Perpetual Help R. C.
Church. Richmond Hill, 10 A. M.
Interment St. Charles Cemetery.
Please omit ﬂowers.
.,
..
,
HOFFMAN—Augusta E., on October 29,
1956. beloved mother of Fhillip Pflug,
dear grandmother of William Pflug,
sister of Anna Uphoff and William
Warnke.
Services. at the Stutzmann Funeral'Home,
224-39 Jamaica avenue. Queens Village,
L. I., on Thursday. 8 P. M. Funeral
Friday, 1:30 P. M.
Interment Lutheran Cemetery.
Jun—Wilhelmina M.. on October 30. 1956.
Beloved wife of Ernest. dear mother of
Jr.. and grandmother of Leona
Ergest
u .
SerVices at the Stutzmann Funeral Home.
224-39 Jamaica avenue. Queens Village.
L.‘ 1.. on Thursday. 8:30 PM. Funeral

a,_

~

Friday. 10

AM.

BAECH’I‘OLD—Emil Albert.‘on October 30.
1956. beloved husband of Anna '1‘. (nee

Pfei er). dear father of Mrs. Ruth H.
Will and Elmer A. Baechtold. brother
01 Christian A. and Walter 0. Baechotld.
also survived by two grandchildren.
Reposing ,at the Floral Park Chapel of
Thomas F. Dalton. 29 Atlantic avenue.
Religious serVices Thursday. 8 P. M.
followed by Masonic services, Eureka
Lodge No. 243, F. a. A. M.. Machinists
Lodge, F. 8: A. M'.,
Interment Friday, 2 P. M._ Lutheran
Cemetery.
.

BURNS—Samuel J., of 84 New York avenue.
Baldwin. formerly of Brooklyn, on October
29, 1956, son of the late George J: Alice
O’Keefe Burns; dear brother
of. Belle

Burns.
Reposing at the Fullerton Funeral Home,
131
Merrick road. Baldwm. Solemn
R. C.
Eeguiegl Firiiiaiss €5.00C1Arilatopher'l
urc
r ay :
.
.
2312
Third Street.
KOLLlNS—John S., of
East Meadow, L. I.. suddenly, on Monday, October 29 1956 in his 45th Year.
beloved husband of Angela. devoted
ratherr of Adrienne. dear brother of Mrs.
Bertha Bowers, Stanley and Tony
Kollins.
R'posing at‘ the Catholic Chapel. 2100 3e11more avenue, Bellmore. L. I.
Notice of funeral later.
Under direction of John J. Mlchalek.
'

Interment Maple Grove Memorial Park.
KENNEDY—Thomas F.. 116-30 221 street,
FUNERAL HOME.
BELMORE
Cambria Heights, L. .I. Beloved husband
of Ethel (nee Huxley), father of Eileen CAROW—Edward, of Malverne. suddenly
Devlin. Kathleen Wilson.» Ethel Albert.
October 30. 1956. beloved
brother of Loretta McGivney. Adeline on Tuesday.
of Rayhusband of Jennie. dear father
Doyle.. Ethel Casey. Seven grandchildren.
'
of Dorothy Koenig and
Reposing at the Funeral Home of Lawrence mond. brother survived
by four grand"
Eldred. also
D. Rouse Inc. 191.02 Linden boulevard,
children,
St. Albans. L. I. Solemn requiem mass. Reposing
at the Flinch a. Bruns Funeral
.Friday. 10 A.M.. Sacred Heart R.C. Home. 34
Hempstead avenue. Lynbrook.
Church. Cambria Heights. L. I.
Interment st. John's Cemetery. Middle The family will receive friends between
the hours of 3 to 5 P. M. 8: 7:30 to
Village. L. I.
10 P. ,M. Masonic services on Thursday.
[ALLY—Philip E., on October 27. 156. 8:30 P. M. Religious services on Friday.
dea; uncle of William F. Lawkins.
10 A. M.
Funeral from the Queens Village Chapel Interment
Knolls Memorial Park.
Nassau
at Thomas M. Quinn a Sons, 214-65 Port Washington.
Jamaica. avenue. Queens Village. L. I..‘
on Friday, 9:30 A. M. Solemn requiem FLORENCE—John W.. on October 30. 1956.
ﬁes: Olﬁ Lady of Lourdes R. C. Church, of 315 Locust avenue. Unlondale. Beloved
husband of Frances. and loving father
Interment St. John’s Cemetery.
of John W. Jr.. Jeanne and Diane. SurLOMBARDO—Teresa
vived by one brother and two sisters.
(Rommanelli) ,
on
October 29, 1956, beloved wife of Angelo Reposing at the Martin Funeral Home. 412
Willis avenue. ,Williston Park. Solemn
Lombardo, devoted mother of Mary
requiem mass at St. Martha R.C. Church
Strollo, Anne Carro, Sue Cremona, John
Frank and Edmund Lombardo, dear sis- on Friday. 10 A.M.
ter of Rafiaela Genovese and Carmela Interment Holy.,Rood Cemetery.
Impci'ato, also survived by seven grand~
children.
KOLLINS—John S.. of 2312 {rm (1 street.
Reposing at the Leo F. Kearns Funeral
East Meadow, L.I.. suddenly n MonHome, 103-33 Lefierts boulevard near
day, October 29, 1956. in his 45th year.
Liberty avenue. Richmond Hil Funeral Beloved husband of Angela. devoted
Thursday. 10 A. M. Seryice at the father of Mrs. Sophie Kincinski AdriChristian Pentacostal Church 'of God, enne, dear brother of Mrs. Bertha Bowers.
Mrs. Ann Mankowskl. Stanley and Tony
10:30 A. M.
Also surviving are two
Interment “The Evergreensz”
Kalirdohlisllgi
en.
ran c
._
Regiaosing
1956.
29
BellOctober
2100
BeMAYER—Bertha. on
Catholic Chapel.
the
at
loved wrfe of Otto Mayer, active member
Bellmore. L. 1. Salem
avenue.
more
‘
of Ridgewood Heights Maenner Cbor.
high requiem mass on Friday Noyember
Memorial services at Buss-Avenius Funeral
2 at 11:15 A.M. at St. Rap leis R.C.
Home. 63-32 Forest avenue.
gewood.
Newbrldge road. East Meadow.
Church.
L. 1.. Wednesday. 8:30 P.
Funeral L. I.
Thursday, 11 AM.
Mt. Calvary Cemetery, Linden.
Inger-merit
Cremation Fresh Pond.
ew ersey.
Under direction of John J. Michalek
MEYER—George F., on Tuesday. October l
BELLMORE FUNERAL HOME
30. 1956. of 111~21 198 street. st. Albana.
L. I. Beloved husband of Florence Meyer.
149 w. Stanton
of
E.
and devoted father of Mrs. Florence McCRAI
Victoria
Combes. grandfather of Dorothy Combes. ,avenueltulaaldwin, on Monday. October 29.
SerVices at the Fairchild Chapel, 220-05
1956. beloved wife of Morton C. McHillside avenue. Queens Village on FriGraime; devoted mother of Douglaomnd
Kenneth: dear daughter of Eugenie and
_day at 8 PM.
Victor Fernandez.
NIGRl—Lucia. beloved mother of Edmund Reposlng
Funeral
Brother:
Weigand
at
oi”
the
ngl‘l
Nigrl Furniture House.
Home. 24 South Grand avenue, Baldwin.
Orstehnydia Mancino: in Italy. Gaetano. Services Wednesday. 8:30 P.M.
Elena. Dorotea, Teresna and Nicoletta. Interment Thursday. Milford Cemetery.
Reposmg at Robert Giordano Funeral Milford Connecticut.
Home. 2346 Pacific street. Brooklyn un-.
til Friday, 9:30 A. M. solemn requiem QUAGLIATo—Anita
Hill). on October
(nee
Our
of
Lady
Loretta
Church.
29. 1956. of 678 Franklin avenue. Massaf0“: alt/I
pequa. L. I. beloved wife of Ferdinando:
Interment St. John's Cemetery.
devoted mother of Mrs. Lucille Rubusto.
oasrﬁtLE—Aiwma. on-October 28, 1956. Mrs. Blanche Burns, Richard, Joseph.
Services Wednesday. October Slst. at and Ferdinand Quagliato; dear sister of
8 P. M. at the Clarence F. Simonson
Mrs. Rose Brandt. Mrs. Isabelle Snediker
Funeral Iﬂome, 119-04 Hillside
and William Hill; also: survived h- “-1-“
‘

___.__,_______———.
-

-

_

.

.

.

‘

�Wham”.

”mi”:
mashing”.
mm”;

'

WW

W
W
W

wmummwmmmw,w
WWatt-bMMuﬁ-mtdw
ww.nmmmumwm¢t:wum

mammwmm
(W)M
murmugmmmdmmam

wwummawmmm
mamam'mmmwmnmu

Whuumumwmmu mam

“anmmmmthWu-m
«mama-ammuuwmmuworbw

WW‘OM

.

manuumnbuwm. ramming-ma.
mamammaum.mmmm~p

mmmwummww
m
mummmcmpmwum.

Awuwmmwamummnmam

Wmuammmmmmmmm

�mmmmdmwmtmmmm
«mmummmmm.umm
memmmwuwwacmma.
Warm». mmuumummhmrw»

”

'maum

mmmummaawm. symmmuummu.mmmmmmm

ummwwmwmm
arm
Mcumumwmmmmumm

mmummmwwumum

�aW-uwwmmumwwmmb
mans-hem
Mmmumumomw

mmmmmmmnmmmnm
ma*m*mmw$nmmm.wm

Warm.“
mammmuanmumwmmmm
“W“W‘IMMWMCIMWMWW
twmdwmrm. ”Manama
WWWWWWnuWM‘
haWMdthWWhM
MM.MM&amp;m¢nManu-m.
mummmmmmmm~
wmawwmmnmmmmum
h
«wwnmmmmmwdmmmm
Wﬁﬁwgmwmdww
'mmnmuumm-

WWmmdMﬂwth

u.m&amp;amm.wsw:mmmtm

mmmuumsmmmmammuma
ammmumummnunmw
hum-1mm
mmmpummm,m.m

mmuawmwmmmmm-mm
mmumm‘ umuuwmmmu
«mammammmmmg
mummwamwwum. wmm’u.
mammawww.mummnmmmmum.
.v

ummewummW-m

�mummgmam,mmmwwm
Manama-nus. wwnm‘uwmm
Mum“. mmmmmwméammp
mu
achw-Mummw.
wmmmummmmumuumm

ﬁthuquﬂmnﬂWﬁﬁ
Wanton-MMMnmmMMA-ath
mwuu‘mwmm-mum

“gm:
.wwmvmwbymmwm
hum
ammunwmm-mw
3)

ammuhswumw

thumm.mmumammh
wwwormmmum mun-Mum

mdaumiwmmmmumamwmm
newsman)... mmumm~mnmnmm
erﬁmﬁmdaMrmwmuandmu

mmnmmunadmm.umum
mmuumumwwm
mmmmmmumww
sumo-m
mmmmuwmamm.
atmmwmmamw.uzmuouma.w

uwwmw.mmmm¢mmywmm

Wg,,,
mnsmummwammuommmm
-'
mmmuammmuuummmh
mapmummmmmu
mm.
unauumnmmmuuwm.
«whammmamuwwm
human
I.)

�a6.

”Wanna-www.mumummm
mmwmmmnumn-wumm
mmwhmmmyuucumumma
mwmmmuwummmmmmm
wdwpmummmw. h m if m

x

m
”1W8!
www.mmmmwnm‘mdw
Wyammmmmmww
-mwmwuwammumwm
S)

"I

�"1)

mammmmmu.m

mm
Wuxiamnm

a) ml.l..u.n.n.mxmi.n.s
’3)
h)

5)

v

/

mmgmunmm

‘Wummmmmmmmu
mmwmmmwwmmm.
W3.1956.

Wmnsmutmmumw
maximum nu
153.1956.
mm.
5:
mm
W...

W, Wuwm

v"

www.muuumm

umanmnmmummam
W.M%WS.I956G

V/

mmaWummm
Wmmamwmm,mnhm

9mm“:

v’

“317431.356.

meammumm.
um. a. mo.

”mun“
7)

”so.

mm
Wmmnumwmmw.m

m.

M arm-mm 11mm: a: scum-mm in

anmmm
mmnwmwwwmmh
15.1956.

a1m.n.n.uuu,u.a

"”
’

man-1.1956.

9}

mat-acme:
mhknm.u.mwhm

v

mumwumtm.mam.
museum.

�*7.
:9)

Mahmunnumumm Walnut-«Annual:

WthMWE-um.
“15.19%.

Km

Miriam

'memammmgm
M
mnmumwmmwmm
m.»u.nn,n.mmmn.l.a.o

mm.w..mmmm.
'11) Mun-“www.mc
mumwamrmm
.

wm$ummmmmw.wu
mom
at 39W.
1956.

13)

1h)

16)

and

a. lo).

a.mmmmm-m.nss.(uumt.mmh

Wannammmmm.ncm
(mm
t. nun-nu, 3.).
mam Wmmmwummmmu;

Imam

W

A.

‘

mum..gamm.mcumm,nu.um.
6.0.).
mun-mammal mammals-w

umummummw.m.wm /
‘

X956.-

m

maul-mum
mmmw'cﬁmmt).
/
Man. as 68-”.1956. (um mm, a.mm,x.n.).
Wu..m.h¢~mx.mmsu.mmmm
H.

m)

I

mum mumamnmumm.m.
396. 3.956.

15)

(um mummy. m a.

.

«Whammwm‘mmnmma.mmm
Wpiiﬂ'ﬂgm

�,v .7. vie .._.,.._..,-,_

"W

’3"“W". m.

..

a":r-x—z

var

Aﬁv

DCK

TERA?!

or
one
administered
third
in
electroshock
therapy
we
in previous years
the adult patients. For the meet pert, it was prescribed for peuente in the
As

forties

and

fifties

who

electroshock was used

manifested depressive symptoms.

(21:

To

a lesser extent,

patients) in schisophrenic patients to modify

ms-

active, essenltin er delusional behavior.
the
studies
the
of
earlier
results
of
that
was
in this group pstients
It
Psychietry were applied and extended. Patients
of the Departmnt or

W

received
series
a
the
electroshock
psychiatrist
by
supervising
for
mmmded
encberbital
test
These
included
electroencepmlogren,
of neurophysiologic tests.

for organic brain disease,

and pemeptusl

tests,

tactile. During
per week, the tests were

both visual and

the course of treatmentﬁhieh ms adminstered three times

periodically repeated.
with clinical

Based upon changes

"alustiens

in these mumplwsiologic tests ceabined

psMiatx-ist, the extent
«amines; In these instances in which the neuro-

by the resident and supervising

of electroshock tmmpy was

treatment
bed
been
not
behavior
obtrdned,
in
alteration
for
basis
physiologie
intensively.
week
and
acre
occasionally
times
modified
five
to
per
regimes were
Ch

this basis, the usual com-es of

tmmnt m

the patients meshing between 6 me lo

batsmen 11 and 19 with

m

percent of the patients received more than 20

of

mtients rescind less
an incomplete series. Twenty-five
treehnen’os .. The number of tmtnnnts

tmtmsnts.

than 5 treatments, which in each instmee

10%

Four

and
to
reference
with
diswosie
therapy
results
at
in chart
is
condition at time at discharge is seen in chart #9.
The original studies relating the alteration in brain function indueed by
electroshock to the short term clinical results, were confirmed in this series
amounts-sud
of
and
his
Fink
staff
Dr.
where
study.
of patients in a predictive
shown

#10 and the

I

that only these patients in

when

alteration in the electroencephalogram and

�#2

mbarbikl taste

had bean

to warrant the rating of
a umber

031‘

reports have

mud,

had

mm

D.

clung. in behavior sufficient

uprated or momma. A: a Insult. of these studies,
been presented before nation]. psychiatric societies.
much

�#3

During 1953 there had been considerable experience

at the hospital

with

of the newer chemotherapeutic agents, chlorprousine and reserpine. It
decided to evaluate ohlorpronasim as a potential substitute for insulin

tVo

was

em

therapy.

The

use of chlorpronnzine we suggested by the many reports

thst

mlcrpronasinc had been successful in schisophrenio psychoses. Also, the specie;
report of the Medical Board noting the course of patients disohnrged

roam

dmonstnted that the poorest long tom results were found in the
insulin cone population. For this reason, a control study was instituted.
Beginning Septenber, 1955, and continuing until Deomber 31, 1956, :11 patients
in

1950 had

referred for insulin

coma

therapy by the supervising psychintriste were divided

into tee groups: one group received insulin coma therapy in the established
doses
received
in
and
second
therapy
the
urge
chlorprmsine
group
newer;
over a four month period.

Insulin

coma

therapy was given for a course of 50 comes

in most instances.

treatedlcsees.
The results
Chart #llxoﬂects the number of cones in insulin
of insulin some therapy is noted in Chart #12 and it is seen that of the 15
much
of
inproved or recovered.
were
a
four
rating
given
patients ,.
In the patients who were given chlorpronesine, dosage ranged betueen

daily with a

800
600
of
milligrams.
to
mge
Treatment was oontimed for a period or shut four months. In this group

200

and 3600 tailligrsms

of patients,

who were

median

unselected except for having been candidates for insulin

of
the
insulin
to
that
were
of
improvement
equivalent
the
ratings
moment,
cone population. 01' 21: patients discharged during 1956, one was discharged as
riftem
miinprored.
and
much
as
improved,
as
em
recovered, three as
inpmd,

some

Guptring the complication rates of both treatments, it was noted that prolonged
of
nine
tones
and
in
were
insulin
resis
cmplications
reactions
ledondary
ems,
the insulin some patients. Wtansion airfioient to cause fainting and severe

demtitis

were complications

in five of the chlorpronasine group. Agitation

�#h

and penis, seizures and
numbers

It

refusal of further therapy were seen in muivalent

of patients in both groups.
was the opinion of the numbers of the Deparhuent of

peydtiatry

ami

Manual

the resident physicians, Doétora Robert Shaw, George Gross

Mean

for this study, that in
to insulin coma therapy, chlorpromasine was safer, easier to ldminater, more
controllable in its effects, and had fewer aid: effects. It was their
recommendation that chlorpmmine therapy would be warranted as the initial

and Fred Coleman, who had hem responsible

treatment for patients in the younger age group

who were

suffering with

schizophrenic disorders. In such cmditions, they anticipated that chlorpromuino
would be most

behavior.

effective in modifying overactive, as saultive and delusional

�#5

cogg sagx rmmr
01'

the ﬁfteen patients treated by insulin com therapy, the modification

of behavior was inadequate in ﬁve, loading to a
be combined with insulin come.

nemudntion

that. electroshock

of these, four patients were suffering

fm a

schizophrenic disorder and one from a manic-depressive
not one of the patients were mach improved

illness. In each instance,
or recovered after combined mutant.

Similarly, there were four patients or the insulin com group who had had metroshock therapy either prior to the insulin com or subsequent to the insulin con

moment.

Here

too, the mtinga or immemnt were in the lower
4

two

categories.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67264">
                <text>Progress and annual reports; research activities (folder title).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67265">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67266">
                <text>mfp-03-01-001-0-004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67267">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67268">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67269">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1954-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67270">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67271">
                <text>Perceptual Changes Induced by Drugs and Electroshock - Progress Report; Research Activities - Annual report; Letters; Annual Reports - Department of Experimental Psychiatry; Newspaper clipping, Hospital reports new methods for evaluating electroshock, Long Island Daily Press, 1956-11-31; </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67272">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67273">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80929">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87490">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94051">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100612">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6728" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3784">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c825cf38265f35eaf923d1fdede27f5a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8e37b7104043290b0428aed652df73e2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="104410">
                    <text>Manhasseit Medical Center Hospital
4CZ54@/¢/;ﬁé€rn.2%éui%§C}¢%;lﬂéd536/ c&lt;lgeyi

N ]E W Y O R K

PEARL A.KLICK
ADMINISTRATOR

35K

TELEPHONE

MANHASSET

7-4000

1:

"VINE

February 25, 1957
Dear Doctor:

Quarterly Medical Staff Meeting of the Manhasset Medical Center
Hospital will be held on Thursday, March 7, 1957, at 8:h5 P.M.,
promptly at THE ALLISON, 1583 Northern Boulevard, almost directly
opposite the hospital.

The

PART

faRT

1. Review and analysis of Clinical werk in the Surgical and
Medical Sections for the month of December 1956, and the
months of January, February 1957 inclusive.

2.

A.

Surgical Section - Ralph S. Emerson, M.D., Chairman

B.

Medical Section

-

3

‘§~
“

Lawrence S. Kryle, M.D., Chairman

Tissue Committee Report - Howard L. walker, M.D., Chairman

SCIENTIFIC

PROGRAM

-

Arnold G. Blumberg, M.D., Chairman

"THE TRANQUILIZERS IN PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE
AND THEIR APPLICATION TO GENERAL PRACTICE."

Dr. Maximilian Fink
Director of Research in Experimental Psychiatry
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
COLLNTION.

Respectfully yours,
John G. Connell, M.D.
President - Medical Board

Telephone number

The
MA 0

Allison is
7"558’4v

at

Harry H. Abrahams, M.D.
Secretary - Medical Board

~ﬁg

��mmmwm,wmpmmmmmmmm
at then obs-mum, w an
both» that

m.
WW
WMMwnwmmoma-pmiwhcwnmmw
Mx

«811.1%

unit-(unmask

mmmumtmwumatmimummmmm

”demhmlm,wmm
mummmmmmmaMaummmmwm
m
Intact.
WWWuloatmthm.
and

Minimum new

'4»

obmﬂw,

We!» afresh.

mmm»mwmmmt¢mhumo£mpmuyotmwb
mm and than mm). mm. m: max-minim at than m mt:
dWarinwclm,thntwhu-Wtomuswwmﬂd~
mwhmmmpemﬂmwhopawnmmwhmmml
behavior me:- that special

mum d um

brain {motion (we Seats.“ 6).

WWanhnwhduwmamtatolmkawm

mmwammmmmmmmmtdmzmmntmt.
shock a a manic mutant. Salaam” mug" in mm Maﬁa which

metro-v

mm

two
than
than
of
lengthlarva-yang
many
him,
mm.
persist
than
Mending
in
way:
his
to
almond!
wfamt
patent
mums

mmaponomiw.
M13,

am
whammpomnmummmmwm

his therapist, an! to other mum“.

mthrMha

when

M

oﬁurmple,musammutMnforhintoMo-nm,mmw
in
tutu
mum.
it
mam, mum tulinaorwnhomisut

by

an

mth

bother

muty

to

Man

with othon.

ma
£106th thaw

“Mammummtfortwmtmotwmma
'

_

studio: at

Mama.

m not“

mt

«that

:Inth-ooumurthau

32:”:me

had

am

that

mmwnwumummnmmmnmmrm,w

��«In

WW‘

AathtMpnviam momm
W338 in the mm at inﬂiﬂéml MW in «mm. Mﬂty Ml
.

ummmwmummekam. wmamuamum
mammnmammlma. nmlamamwuu

W

dummiom W

whom.
manummuumuhmormmmmuméapmrmwm
mt: or

or

induced by

mammm: Wmhhymmlﬁuut marmmmw,wuw
Wmuhtiam the,

response to

tin

«mm mama to 3551mm m boa

umwwmmummmm(mmm Win
In, itumuipum
thutmlmntarywmmmmsumhm

mmmuutnnmmmMmpmummum,mmtm

”munm'mummmw.
Gum
the
the
alumna-hip
mm «Mmmad
anmmmmamlmmummmnmwmw
mat of 01
tramway. we may in mum."
concurrently, Dr.

~

--

has

-

w

na-

3.

am, hu

mm

and ten

W
3.“

4

aw, under as:

013an

have

a: Dr. 31am mmbut: museum hero-m tho In

Mmmmmmmmm manmummmmmu

ammmchunamammmma‘nmsmwmawmm

chum.

'

4* m:
mmwmxmmmmmmmmmuor
.

,

magma...

mmnwmmuwummmmamwm
maxim/:31“.
hmm,‘§9‘pﬁmunhmdtwmmmm
1957.

ﬂammmmnmwmmmmwmmw
«Mammal!»
It
cmluim
”was

M.

«human
”mom” ﬂammable Warpatumulmmmtham.
mm

that.

as

�.5.

mm m

be
the
for
diseharge
to
better for the claim-pren—
ratings
team
uino group than for tho
um group. H. emclmd that, in
to 111M131: new therapy, ehloxpmine m mar, easier to
aura
contmlhbla in its effects. and had fmr $5.60 attach. We 3190 amended
tint n9 evidame had appear“ in the fiftm math: a! the study that. either
than” had altered thy basic. schiaaphmie process, nor did my real that either
tom of therapy had a greater speciﬁcity far schizophnnie illnesses. At the
concluaim of the stndy, the ladies). Biroctur placed
in tin for»

ulary and

a

um

13¢th
a.

its use

13m

IV

smut:

mm”,

the maidont staff.

W:

@10me

During this” period Dr. Green has

evaluﬂd

magma, for its ability to bring out
debuts in brain mum. The "port. at his findings mm meant-ad at. the
aid-winter muting of the Eutem lasaeiation of Bleetroancephalographam.
dials :6. Pro «aka
8:
It. is anticipated that tha mark now in prams: in we
will continue for the remainder of the year. The aleetmshock evaluation
study will be cmletod this spring and the next few months will ha spent in
a new agent in ulcetrooncepmlographg,

M

'

«muting

biannual: chained and writing the reports. As indicated
in the ongoing pmgraaa not”, a. War of development: have grown out. at these
studies and it. is anticipated that than will he immoramd in the mum n—
the

W

aeamh pmgrlm

1.
been

«aloud by

Diffomma 3.3; Wen}. Romam
pmtocol has
Dr. “a: Franck, which incorporates than pmblem or panama
11

dictating individual rosponsivity to abattoshoek. By entertaining than
subject‘ 8 patterns of perception in awfully devolopod arianhatim and visual

1uy

tasks, in hope to demonstrate

O.

“hump

batman: those pater-nu and the

bov-

both
havioral
under the. special conditim of altered brain funcuun.
and the general condition of hospitalisation and plywothompy. 8min a study

ream,

has bearing on tha problems of the personality

upset: of resume to

change

�«6.

in behavior wider stressful maniacs (us in forceful indactrimum, isolatim.
atarmtim); a3 well as an «imam at mimic madame fer various W“

chntric therapies.

ma
mamwwwm
me
mums“
W
w:
2.

with elootmahock have led us to

Em-

theua

mute personality factors in the patient and

which

ing the chain of treatment.
a workabla hypothasia.

We

He

of

a.

hypo—

the tharapi‘at affect»

am in the process of developing our ideas into

antiéipate mdertnking such

Mt

I

stuck by the and of the

last report this section has been mdeaigna‘bed an the
of Men-1mm thiatry. In addition to the panama]. listed

31am the
Department

the

timofﬂwwtmport,mhmappointad, maparttimbasis,

mm

at.

mm

assistant in psychalngy. Dr. Pomek, who has his 111.11.
from Kw York: University in 1955, has bean a mum-oh psychologist at tho Haunt
Sinai Hospital and the 145mm rmdaum for emu Research for the past six
Ha
is experienced in both pamanauty and perceptual ”pants in march.
years.
It. in anticipatod that he will be appoint“ an 2. m1 tin basis on My 131:.
A
the
individual
differences in bahavior with specific ambush
to
study
pram
Pamela, as

on tho

perceptual and

ation has been

made

pemmnty sweats

has teen

«“10de by his and applic-

to various foundations for support.

mauve April 131:, than

will be appeintod to the

Duparfanent, a

Assistant for linguistic analyses. Under the hem of the
E) funds warn and:

mm“
x.

devised ‘by

m:
21::

«:1th

Firm.”

far a technical assistant he carry
Dr. Jane.

manna»!

1mm

Grant (see
out.

Senna

the language

for Renaud: in Psyuhutry has gxmtad Dr. Jute
sun or [26,919 plml $5,700 overhud far continuum

Fund

support for two years in than
of the study “Language of the

Dyna“ which

has been dmlopod during hm past year.

�ﬂan

MMMMmWVWWrmum. mama-mm
«mumspm

1st.

3957

unmmmt.

1959.

mmmmmummmmuwudmmwm

mararmmawmmmwmam £100»,me

mumwmmmxmm-mwmmwmzwnmm
ammwmnmmummmsumw,wmmmm

InWr,;mawrthammkqu

atmmwmammmmmtmummm

mummuuwnhumamunumsmmumwwm

nmr,nr.ammmmnm
mmmmw.
inmwmmmmmwhgmwnwnmemum

mm‘dWomx-l. kWawﬂmWﬁs
dWWWWMMmmmmmammm
in
m Widv mom 153mm my.
autism
“MW
tho

Em

MWMWtWamrdmmawvmmmuMmr
ﬂammmrmmu»hpoumha1umtorpnmumu
an Week mum}: mama. th- smosy or Mom-1 WW, tho

Inumhiml Wan

of

RM

and the Imam-Mom}.

0mm! fer WW.‘

hmumnmmmmwwwumwunmmm
ma
for
humﬁml
Puma? ”W4.
Mm:
WM: mum

mummnnmmmmmammwnam
thrmthMme,uthw-omcmmmmm
summeodmga.
Womanhmmmmmwupummmma

mmwwm.hﬂo,umupmmungmormm

mum»“momwmdummotmmrdmwmmmm
Chum;

�vammamwmmmmmmamw
fowlmm. unnaommmwanmnmmum
or
J. Mt. 1:
in

Manny
mm}.
m
3mm
mm:

Dr.
anti-u”.
main
mum” at. an mum Alma: mu mum

means

with

an

W
Wthmmuthortmmmmho-

W,
matmwmmmmumum.

of

Dr.

a

mmmamnmsmvm‘mmmm

Morn a: thin-Baum: an «an in an «Mama and m...

other 19%.

numtatmthm;

WW:
mwmmwmm. DnlgmmbmnmngtMpmbhmof

smwwmmmmuhmm

0

Wm
wmwammmw‘mﬂammwhmmm.
mm
puma
pm:
mm
mm
is
um We
Wm
mmuwappmuwmmumm. hummmpmaaar
with

acumen ”mm.

Elam

during

typu of

no

bu been mpcmm

ﬂu «mm-hock
maniacal... 69min supports.“ an!

that.

and

In thin new: be

mmmwumum.
Dr. 3.

Fri-mm contributed mun-My to mmamm mm.

mmmmmmwwmw.

In

WWmnodWMme,mmofmmmtmm

mm

m a may

mm“ mm:

m- m

on
at
.m
u»
mam
mm:

mmmmmmmuw.
Manama,

WM”
W

1913!!

a: tum-3mm

Mammary:

Wm

Max

Pink.

11.13.

�March 1957

Personality Factors in Behavioral Beeponse to Electroshock Therapy
Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D. andMax Pink,

From
New

14.

D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

York.

Aided by grant 14-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, l“aﬁcional Institutes of Health, APublic Health Service.

Presented

a

the Electroshock Research Association, Chicago,

May

1957.

�INTRODUCTION

The

behavioral response of patients receiving electroshock therapy is

variable. In previous studies of the factors related to this variability

we

that patients who showed early, persistent and relatively marked degrees
of altered brain function, as measured by the e1ectroencephalogram.and the
amobarbital test for brain disease (10), were most likely to show a clinical
The
(h)
(6)
which
(7).
improved
rated
was
present study is an
as
response
investigation of the role of personality in the behavioral reSponse.
An explicit hypothesis concerning this relationship has been derived

noted

from previous studies of the patterns of behavioral change occurring with
EST.

In an analysis of language changes after electroshock (7),

that patients

who

we

reported

develop such language patterns as explicit denial of

ill-

and
of
and
symptoms;
displacement
qualifitemporal
Spatial
personal,
ness;
cation, evasion and minimization are rated as improved. These language patterns

are similar to those previously described by Weinstein and

Kahn (13)

in their

studies of neurological patients with cerebral dysfunction. They characteru
ized this behavior as the "language of denial" and demonstrated a relationship

to personality. In particular they described the characteristics of the "ex€M)On
the
of
these
the
denial"
basis
verbal
observations,
personalit
plicit
hypothesis was advanced that those patients

who most

closely approximated this

"explicit verbal denial" personality type would be more likely to
havioral changes after
The purpose

EST

show

the be-

which are rated as improved.

of the present study, therefore, was to determine:

1) whether personality characteristics related to the behavioral
reaponse

to electroshock therapy

show

proved.

differentiated; and

patients with greater "denial" tendencies are more likely
behavioral changes after electroshock therapy which are rated as imp
2) whether

to

can be

�.2POPULATION

Sixty-three consecutive patients referred for electroshock therapy were
studied.

staff,

The

selection of patients for treatment

was made by the

psychiatric

independent of the judgment of the authors. The patients ranged in age

from 20

to

66 with a mean of I47, and included 21 men and

142

women.

METHOD

Prior to treatment each patient

was evaluated according

to the following

methods :

l.

Structured

EM

Interviews: Personality was evaluated in inter-

patient' 3 family. At the opening of the interview,
the relative was asked to describe, in his own words, the patient's usual interests and attitudes. The relatives were encouraged to talk about any aspect
they wished, and the interviewer followed the trend of their talk, rather thm
proceeding in a serial fashion. The interviewer asked questions, however, to
been
15
obtain information in m
described as charspecific areas which have

views with members of the

acteristic of the "explicit verbal denial" personality,“.

The number and

withgibrelative
varied according to the degree of
type of questions required
spontaneous production and the infomant' 3 capacity to comprehend and 00mm:-

icate.

The

informant was encouraged to give concrete examples of

all state-

ments.

basic items included the presence and extent of each of the following
features: 1) stress verbal symbols such as resolutions, homilies, cliches and
The

rationalization; 2) are prestige and security conscious, and do not enjoy the
intrinsic benefits of health, work, leisure, money and property; 3) regard illness as an imperfection or disgrace, keeping

neighbors, and are

it

a secret from the family and

reluctant to seek medical care;

troubles and are considered practical persons

who

)4)

"shake off"

their

advise others; 5) have

drive and compulsive energr, and are guilty or uneasy

if

own

much

not occupied; 6) are

conscientious with a high sense of duty and responsibility; 7) are sensitive
.

�.3to criticism, regarding

it as

an

attack

on

their integrity;

8)

are proud and

avoid help from others; 9) are reserved rather than openly affectionate or
emotional; 10) emphasize being correct; 11) are not imaginative or creative;
12) are not seen as dependent by

their relatives;

1h) do not have temper outbursts; 15) and are not

After the interview, each item

if

score of 0 was given
1
2

was

rated

on a

13) do not discuss sex openly;

ludic (25).
scale of 0, 1 or 2.

A

the aSpect was noted to a minimal degree; a score of

indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a score of
indicated the definite and marked presence of the pattern. The scores for

each item were added and the

resultant score is termed the "denial personality

score".

2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient
weekly intervals during and

evaluation

prior to and at
following the course of treatment. The clinical

was determined by

was interviewed

the patient's behavior in the few weeks following

the end of the course of treatment and

was

based on the evaluation of the pat-

ient's therapist, the therapist's supervising psychiatrist and the supervising
psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock treatment unit. Patients were
classed into three groups:

much improved,

moderately improved, or unimproved,

criteria outlined previously (6).
3. Language gtggy: In addition to the clinical interviews,

following the

each patient

standardized series of questions determining his attitude

was examined with a

toward his

illness.
trouble?" and "If you

Two

of the questions asked were,

“What

is

youi'mein

had one wish, what would you wish for?" The

patients

were

tested before and during treatment and the verbatim responses were analyzed for
changes in language according to the method previously described (7).
RESULTS

The

relatives of

scores ranged from

O

h?

patients were interviewed. The&lt;ienia1 personality

to 25, with a median of 11. For statistical comparison

�.14-

the patients were divided into two groups. Patients with scores ranging from
11
0

to
to

25 were

10 were

frm

considered the "high denial" group, while those with scores

classed as low in denial tendencies.

1. Personality score and clinical response: Patients with high denial
personality scores in these family interviews were most likely to be rated as
much improved, and

patients with

low scores, however, the

basis, with

chance

only one case was considered unimproved (Table

30%

I).

In

clinical response rating occurred

on a

of the patients being regarded as mimproved.

I

TABLE

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical Response to Electroshock
Much

Improved

Moderately
Improved

Total

Unimproved

Personality Score
11
0

-

25

1h

9

1

2h

10

7

9

7

23

21

18

8

it?

Total
The

proved

difference in the denial scores between the

patients,

when compared

sigzificant.* Although the

much and

moderately im-

to the unimproved patients is statistically

much improved

patients have a higher

mean

score

is not significant.
2. Qualitative observations: Although there is a relationship between
high denial personality scores and the clinical rating, 30% of patients with
than the moderately improved group, this difference

low denial scores were also evaluated as showing a marked improvement. While
trig/1:119 group

of seven patients

is

a small one , certain

common

characteristics can

be described. Although these subjects lack the competitive

security needs of the high denial subjects, they
or imaginative capacity or ability to think
Si
~K-

vb; { {ran-M

at

1%

level of confidence by

show

drive, prestige and
a similar lack of creative

critically of their

Mann-Whitney

U

Test.

own

or other's

�.5relate to the environment primarily by non-verbal forms of
commmication. They are described by their families as laughing or crying

feelings.

They

excessively; and as showing anger by muteness, ”go into a shell," ”walk out

of the room in a huff,” or by violent tempers with table-pounding, throwing
objects or direct physical assault. These patients are "ludic,"
by Weinstein and Kahn (12) to denote comic,

language analysis described in a

in clinical interviews

term used

tragic, or melodramatic behavior.*

1m:
previous study (7), the

3. Personality score and Meg

-a

Applying the technic of

i__n_

changes

in

language

were compared with the denial personality scores. Nine

patterns of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or

symptoms,

displacement, qualification, £33. have been described as characteristically

occurring

after electroshock.

ified according to the

plicit language

As

in the previous study, each patient

was

class-

dichotomy of whether or not he showed three or more ex-

changes. Patients with high denial personality scores showed

a greater number of language changes, than those with low denial personality

scores (Table

II).

The

coefficient of correlation between the personality

scores and the number of language changes

the

1%

is

.71, significant

+

at better than

level of confidence.
TABLE

II

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical Language Changes During
Treatment
Number Langggge Changes

0

-

2

3

or

more

Personality Scores
11 .- 25

(20)

8

12

-

(20)

17

3

25

15

o

10

Total
This term was taken from Piaget who applied
behavior of young children (8).

*-

it to

the play and imitative

�h. Illustrative Cases:
Case

1. High Denial Personality Score:
A

61-yearbold housewife was admitted to the hospital with a 15

history of insomnia, abdominal pain and fear of cancer. On admission
she was depressed, retarded, and seclusive, evincing little interest in her

month

surroundings, and wandering aimlessly about the ward.
The

patient

reaponsible person with
and was unable
home.

her husband as a conscientious, dependable,
integrity. She had no hobbies, outside interests,

was described by
much

to relax.

She was ”mortally

As

a consequence, she busied herself with chores

at

afraid" of doctors, minimized her illnesses and con-

cealed ailments, even from her husband. Very restrained, she openly showed no

affection or emotion, never discussed sex and rarely lost her temper. She had
"a long memory for little things if she felt that she was wronged," a ”streak
of stubborness," and would "just as soon hold another person responsible for

her mistakes." She was proud and would ”rather go without food" than borrow
or take money from others.
According to the denial

criteria, her score

After 20 electroshock treatments, she

was 20.

became euphoric, took an

interest

in her personal appearance and participated in hospital activities. Her doc"model"
”while
her
who,
a
reluctant to discuss her personal
patient
toi/called
feelings, asserted that she had no difficulties at

hue-'had
home,
a wonderful

band.uho was very good to her, considered herself lucky and eagerly anticipated

her discharge.”
Case

She was discharged with a

2.
A

Low

rating of

"much improved."

Denial Personality Score:

hl-year-old housewife

was admitted

to the hospital with a two

year history of depression following the birth of her fourth child. She cried

frequently, lost interest in social activities, found it increasingly difficult
to take care of her baby and had suicidal thoughts. On admission the patient

�was'

noted to pay

little attention

showed psychomotor

The
whom
He

it

patient

retardation

and was

was described by

was not easy

to her personal appearance, cried readily,
circumstantial in speech.

her husband as a "negative personality” with

to get along because she

was opinionated and argumentative.

regarded her as "completely impractical, with no

common

sense." She was a

poor housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other people, although not the
kind of person who would put herself out for others.

An

excessively talkative

person, she liked to engage in long, intellectual, pretentious conversations.
When

angry, however, she would become either completely mute, or "very nasty,

just don't know any better.” Although considered a “cold" person,
able to talk freely about sex. She frequently complained of physical

implying you
she was

ailments and went to physicians readily. She was ”naive" and "unrealistic,"

believing, for example, that she had a

flair for writing

although others con-

sidered her amateurish.
Her

personality score

was

rated as h.

patient received eighteen electroshock treatments, which were terminated at her own insistence because she was too frightened to take any more.
At the time of her discharge her doctor noted her as "quite depressed,” but
The

felt that
hospital.

it

was

doubtful that she could benefit from further treatment

She was discharged with

at

the

the recommendation for continued psychother-

apy.
DISCUSSION

The

structured family interview

was designed

to test the specific hypo-

thesis derived from earlier observations that patients with the "explicit
verbal denial” personality are most likely to Show both the language and behavioral changes to electroshock therapy which are rated as
the examiner.

The

much improved by

data supports this hypothesis and is also consistent with

�the theory of the

mode

of action of electroshock therapy advanced by Weinstein,

that “....the therapeutic efficacy of
electroconvulsive therapy....derives from the production of a state of brain
function in which the mechanism of denial is facilitated in characterologically

Linn and Kahn in 1952 (9).

They suggest

diaposed individuals."
The degree

of explicit verbal denial

is,

however, only one

personality

aspect affecting the behavioral response to treatment. 0n the basis of the

present data and methods of analysis a broader view of personality patterns in

relation to improvement with
as

clinically

EST

is

now

possible.

improved are characterized by such

Those

patients

who

are rated

features as: l) non-empathic

- unable to think critically or sensitively about the needs,feelings, or

-

commun-

ications of others; 2) non-introspective - - unable to think critically about
their own feelings or needs; unable to achieve insight even with the collaboration of others in a psychotherapeutic relationship; 3) rely heavily on nonverbal communication - - even

tial

when

they are talkative there is

little

referenp

communication, the words being cliched, stereotyped, or representative of

feelings and emotions rather than transmitters of information and h) highly
conventional - - without imaginative or creative capacity, and with few resources
to deal with stressful or
With
re8pond

new

this pattern as the

situations.

common

background, two classes of patients who

to treatment can be defined: a) the driving, conscientious, independent,

successful, emotionally-controlled person who can be characterized as the ”explicit verbal denial” personality type; b) the chronically inadequate, affectd::;;;&amp;rfrom
and
ively labile
ludic, dependent person,
an impoverished socio-

cultural background. While both types are rated as improved in their short
tenm response to electroshock, preliminary folloWhup observations indicate that
the "explicit verbal denial" personality type

clinical response, while the Indie

group

is

more

likely to sustain the

is likely to relapse quickly.

�Consistent with our previous studies

we have

found that altered brain fun-

ction is a necessary condition for behavioral change with electroshock therapy.
The kinds of behavioral change shown with altered brain function, however, vary
markedly in

different patients.

ment of symptoms and are

states,

become withdrawn,

Some Show mood

rated as improved. Others develop paranoid agitated
or show additional somatic or

are rated as unimproved. In this study

in those cases

we

who were

memory

complaints, and

here stressed the personality factors

whose behavioral reSponse was

considered the patients

changes and denial or diSplace-

rated as improved.

we have

not

rated as only moderately improved or unimproved.

If the basic hypothesis is correct,

we

should also find a relationship between

personality and the behavioral response in patients

who

are rated as unimproved.

Present information in this regard is minimal, as this problem has not'been
approached with a specific hypothesis.

raise questions concerning the relation of personality
to type of mental illness and choice of therapy. Clinical observations support
These observations

the concept of a characteristic predepressed personality. Abraham (I) noted

that states of depression occurred in obsessional persons. Arnot ‘2) describes
depressions as being overly conscientious and perfectionistic. Hamilton and

(5), reporting various aspects of the personality in involutional depression, include such features as "followed a rigid pattern of behavior....displayed a lack of imagination....narrow range of interests....thorough, cone

Mann

scientious, meticulous devotion to duty....lack of feeling for point of view
of others....hard, uncompromising drivers....oversensitive....reserved.“ Cohen,

et

a1 (3)

in an intensive study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their

patients as being highly prestige-conscious;

little

concerned with prdblems of

interpersonal relatedness; stereotyped; conventional; having

for communicative interchange; and

unaware of

little

capacity

other persons' feelings toward

�.10himself or of his feelings toward others. They emphasized the patients' inability

to communicate verbally and suggested that the therapeutic relationship should
be in nandverbal terms rather than emphasizing the intellectual contents of the
exchange.
These studies of the personality background of depression show a

that is

pattern

similar to those personality asPects which have been described as
the "explicit verbal denial" personality. The factor of personality could thus
most

explain the fact that depression is the condition which responds best to electroshock treatment.

The same

personality factors which

to a depressive reaction are those which
forms of therapy.

These

factors enable

make him

him

make

a person susceptible

responsive to noneverbal

to respond, under the conditions

of altered brain function, with those language and other behavioral changes
which are evaluated as improved.

Thus, the same stereotypy, conventionality,

perfectionism, and prestige-consciousness, which produce a catastrophic response in the individual faced by the loss of a partner, job, business, or
loved one permit the development of denial, minimization and displacement under

the conditions of altered brain function and are deemed ”improved” by the family
and the

therapist.

�SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1. Personality factors in

63

consecutive patients referred for electro-

shock therapy were studied by means of a structured family interview.

2.

The

3.

The

which

results

that aSpects of personality can be differentiated
are significantly related to the response to treatment.
show

basic personality pattern of the patients who reSpond best can
be characterized as a) non-empathic, b) non-introspective, c) communicate non-

verbally, and d) highly conventional and stereotyped, with
or creative capacity.
h. 'Within the context of this
of improved patients.

One

group

is

common

little

imaginative

core, there are two main subdivisions

comparable to the

”explicit verbal denial"

personality, showingiﬁzch features as drive, conscientiousness, independence
and emotional control. The other group consists of persons apt to be chron-

ically inadequate

and dependent, coming from deprived socio-cultural back-

grounds, who are affectively

5.

labile

and

ludic.

relationship between these personality patterns and descriptions
of the personality of depressed persons is noted. The same personality factors
The

which contribute

to a depressive reaction, contribute to a behavioral change
under the conditions of altered brain function following electroshock therapy

which

is evaluated as

improvement.

�~12REFEEENCES

1. Abraham, K.: Selected Papers
Press Ltd., 1919.
Amot,

on

Psychoanalysis.

London: The Hogarth

Predepressed Personality, A.M.A. Arch. Neural.
Chiato, L6: 617-618, 1956.
The

12.:

&amp;

Psy-

3.,

Baker, G., Cohen, R. A., From—Reichmam, F. and Weigert,
E. V.: In Intensive Study of Twelve Cases of Manic-Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiat., 1.1: 103-137, 1951.

Cohen, M.

Pink,

and Kahn, R. L.:

Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity
Following Electroshock, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., Q: 158, 1956.

M.

Hamilton, D. M. and Mann, W. A.: The Hospital Treatment of Involutional
Psychoses, in Depression (Hock, P. and Zubin, J. , eds.) , New York:
Grune &amp; Stratton, 199-209, 1952.

L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, 11.14.11. Arch. Neurol.
&amp; Psydliato, 16-: 23-29, 1956.

Kahn, R.

7. Kahn, R. L. and Fink, 14.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Psychopatholog of Commication (Hock, P. and Zubin, J. ,
Eds.) in press.
‘

8. Piaget,

J.: Play,

Dreams and

Imitation in Childhood.

New

York: W. W.

9. Weimtein, E. 1., Linn, L. and Kahn, R. L.: Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy, Am.

J.

PSYChiato’

3:99.:

22.26, 1952.

10. Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugaman, L. A. and Linn, 1a.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium ("Anwtal Sodium") in Organic Brain Dis-

ease,

ll. Weinstein,

Am.

J. Psychiat., 113:

889-891;, 1953.

E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Personality Factors in Denial of
&amp;
A.M.A.
Arch.
Neural.
Psychiat., 92: 355-367, 1953.
ness,

Ill-

Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L. and Sugarman, L. A.: Ludic Behavior in
Patients with Brain Disease, J. Hillside Hosp. , 2: 98-106, 1951;.
13. Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Springfield, 111.: Charles C. Thomas, 1955.

�April 1, 1957.
MEMORANDUM

TO:

Medical Affairs Committee

FOR:

Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller

FROM:

Department of Experimental Psychiatry

SUBJECT:

1957.
1956
to
April
1,
September
of
Departmental
Activities,
Report

Experimental
of
the
Department
of
the
of
activities
following report
since
the
period
covering
of’Dr.
Miller,
the
submitted
request
at
Psychiatry is
The

September 1956.
A.

Progress in Ongoing Projects:

the
evaluate
The
signifito
control
study
Evaluation:
1. Electroshock
be
com1956,
will
on
April
1,
instituted
electroshock
therapy,
cant elements in
been
has
been
have
studied.
It
1957.
Seventy
patients
pleted by the end of’May
the
electrointo
insights
have
we
and
gained
significant
successful
a most
group,
made
1955-56,
in
observation,
the
we
original
verified
shock process. First,
dethe
is
electroshock
therapy
behavior
in
in
change
that the prerequisite for
function.
brain
in
and
sustained
alteration
degree
velopment of a significant
Under the conditions of altered brain function, however, patients respond in
electroshock
is
follows
that
the
improvement
In
some
patients,
various ways.
the

that
was
opinion
our
It
disappears.
rapidly
while
in
others, it
sustained,
observations.
these
determinant
in
instrumental
the
was
patient's personality
in
the
of
patients
the
personality
studied
have
intensively
we
For this reason
standard
interview
developed
tests,
this last group. By applying specially
have
we
number
of
questionnaire
tests,
and
a
modifying
psychological tests,
and
of
type
between
personality
the
number
of
relationships
determined a
behavioral
the
we
At
predicting
are
time,
the present
behavioral response.
and
during
our
predictions
electroshock
to
therapy,
the
of
patients
response
As
a
result
chance.
than
better
been
have
months
significantly
the past few
include
to
personality
extend
study
our
to
we
planning
are
of these observations,
G).
Section
(see
results
psychotherapy
in
factors
changes
the
been
has
perceptual
of
patients
Our second interest in this group
to
deable
have
been
we
control
of
a
By
group,
virtue
induced by electroshock.
and
those
treatment
the
to
related
which
are
changes
termine those perceptual
im—
been
have
we
In
these observations,
which are related to practice effects.
and
their
the
of
the
patients
personality
close
interrelation.bf
the
pressed by
two
so
behavior
of
is
The
these
of
aspects
interrelation
perceptual processes.
in
differences
individual
of
undertake
study
a
decided
have
to
we
close, that
under
the
behavior
eventual
to
such
differences
and
to
relate
hope
perception
0).
Section
(see
function
brain
of
altered
special conditions
Our

which
electroshock
therapy
of
concept
a
to
have
led
develop
us
studies

Electrotreatment
unit.
of
this
management
the
in
has been of significant help
which
function
brain
in
induces
changes
treatment.
It
shock is a non-specific
Under
these
two
months.
than
less
of
usually
time,
persist for varying lengths
depending
environment
different
in
ways
to
his
the
responds
patient
conditions,
his
he
to
better
'With
relates
certain
a
personality,
upon his personality.

�-2The
and
better that he relates to
to
other
his
patients.
family,
therapist,
other people the less reason is there-for him to become tense, anxious or
6nce
the feeling of well-being is set into motion, it is sustained
depressed.
by the patient's better ability to function with others. Electroshock therapy
is not a specific treatment for a specific fbrm of mental illness.
2. Biochemical Changes in Electroshock: In the course of these studies
of electroshock, we noted that other investigators had reported that there were
and
the
one report
fluid
after
in
trauma,
in
Spinal
changes
enzymes
specific
noted similar changes after electroshock. Dr. Goldenberg and I undertook a
study of these enzymes in order to verify the previous reports and to clarify
our own picture of the electroshock process. To date, we have collected 30
spinal fluids. I anticipate that this phase of the work will continue until

the end of 1957.

3. Communication Studies: Our interest in communication problems has
led to two types of studies. In one, Dr. J. Jaffe has developed a technique for
the analysis of recorded interviews which provides us with an objective index of
change in behavior. Support for this phase of the work has been obtained from
the Foundations' Fund for Research in Psychiatry. At present, he is analyzing
the recordings of interviews with electroshock patients made earlier in the year,
and his findings are correlating very well with the clinical results. we antiand
the
in
of
language
changes
to
an
technique
analysis
this
applying
cipate
behavior that occur in ps;chotherapeutic interviews.

analysis of the structured amytal test intero
views according to changes in syntax and content. The original findings of this
study were presented to the AmeriCan Psychopathological Association in June.
Since then, all our amytal test interviews are being analyzed in like fashion
and the original findings have been verified and amplified. ”e have come to
understand that the language of our patients tells us readily whether or not
changes have occurred in brain function and in behavior. Furthermore, correlations between the personality evaluations and the language changes have shown
a direct relationship between high degree language changes and certain personwith
other personality types.
and
changes
minimal-to-no
language
types;
ality
Language is thus a recordable facet of behavior and we are ODtlmiStiC that a
combination of the language analyses developed by Drs. Jaffe and Kahn would be
a meaningful index of changes in behavior applicable to any form of psychiatric
therapy, including psychotherapy.
h. Egrebral Reactivity: As described in the previous report, our
interest in the question of individual variability in cerebral reactivity has
been stimulated by our electroshock studies. One part of this study is the
A second is the study of the
biochemical
in
changes
fluid.
of
spinal
study
rate of development of electroencephalographic change induced by electroshock.
Dr. Green has begun this phase of the work and since September has surveyed all
EEG
basic
of
their
by
records, and their
an
electroshock
analysis
our
patients
been
has
Mcgimide
to
the
cerebral
to
Also,
response
hyperventilation.
reSponse
A

second study

is

a language

assessed and this phase of the work completed (see Section B). Beginning in May,
the
admissions
new
hOSpital
the
to
that
will
screen
is
laboratory
anticipated
it
and that various activation procedures will be tested, so that the definitive
study can be undertaken in the Fall.

Concurrently, Dr. Green has assessed the relationship between the electroshock seizure threshhold and cranial resistance as factors influencing the development of electroencephalographic abnormality. This study is in progress.

�.3This study, under the direction of Dr. Sidney TaraNew
York
have
and
been
before
the
the
observations
continued
has
presented
chow,
Neurological Society in January. The observations have been summarized in a reand
A.M.A.
Archives
of
which
Neurology
the
in
Psychiatry.
will
shortly
appear
port
S.

B.

Ambivalence:

Completed

Projects:

1. Chlorpromazine-Insulin

Coma:

Control Study: An interim report on the results of this
control study was submitted to the Research Committee of the Medical Board on
January 31, 1957. In this study, 59 patients referred for insulin coma were
divided into two groups - one-half receiving insulin coma and the other half
receiving chlorpromazine therapy. It was our conclusion that chlorpromazine
is as effective in modifying psychotic behavior patterns as insulin coma therapy.
There was a tendency for the discharge ratings to be better for the chlorpromazine
,we
to
concluded
insulin
in
comparison
coma
the
than
for
insulin
that,
group.
group
coma therapy, chlorpromazine was safer, easier to administer, more controllable in
had
Tb
evidence
concluded
had
no
also
and
that
fewer
side
effects.
apits effects,
peared in the fifteen months of the study that either therapy had altered the basic
schizophrenic process, nor did we feel that either form of therapy had a greater
specificity for schizophrenic illnesses. At the conclusion of the study, the
Medical Director placed chlorpromazine in the formulary and permitted its use by
the Resident staff.

Insulin

Coma

2. Megimide Evaluation: During this period, Dr. Green has evaluated a
new agent in electroencephalography, megimide, for its ability to bring out defects in brain function. The report of his findings Twere presented at the midwinter meeting of the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers.

0.

Projected Studies

It is

.

1957-58:

in progress in the Department will
The electroshock evaluation study will
be completed this Spring and the next few months will be spent in correlating
the information obtained and writing the reports. As indicated in the ongoing
and
have
of
studies
these
out
number
of
developments
grown
it
a
progress notes,
is anticipated that these will be incorporated in the_active research program.
anticipated that the work
continue for the remainder of the year.

now

A
Behavioral
Reapgggg:
protocol has been
1. £ndividual_Differences in
developed by Dr. Max Pollack, which incorporates the problem of personality affecting individual responsivity to electroshock. By determining the subject's patterns
of perception in specially developed orientation and visual tasks, we hope to demonstrate a relationship between these patterns and the behavioral response, both
under the special condition of altered brain function, and the general condition
of hospitalization and psychotherapy. Such a study has bearing on the problems of
the personality aspects of resistance to change in behavior under stressful conditions (as in forceful indoctrination, isolation, starvation); as well as the
definition of suitable candidates for various psychiatric therapies.

2. Personality Factors in Doctor and Patient Affecting Choice of Thera :
Our experiences with electroshock have led us to a unmber of hypotheses which relate personality factors in the patient and the therapist affecting the choice of
treatment. We are in the process of developing our ideas into a workable hypothesis.
We anticipate undertaking such a study by the end of the year.

�D.

Changes

in rersonnelz-

Since the last re\ort, this section has been redesignated as the Department
the
of
time
the
at
the
to
personnel
In
addition
listed
of Experimental Psychiatry.
Max
Research
Dr.
as
Pollack,
a
have
on
we
part-time
basis,
appointed,
last report,
New
York
from
who
University
has
his_Ph.D.
Dr.
Pollack,
Assistant in Psychology.
and
mount
the
Sinai
Hospital
the
at
research
been
has
psychologist
a
in 1955,
He
is experienced
the
six
for
Research
Child
past
years.
Ittleson Foundation for
he
that
is
anticipated
research.
in
and
It
perceptual aspects
in both personality
A
the
indito
study
July
on
program
basis
a
full-time
be
on
lst.
appointed
will
and
the
on
perceptual
personemphasis
with
behavior
specific
vidual differences in
made
various
been
has
to
and
him
been
application
by
developed
ality aspects has
foundations for support.

Technical
a
the
be
to
Department,
appointed
will
there
Effective April let,
FFRP
(see
Section
Grant
Under
the
of
terms
the
analyses.
Assistant for linguistic
E) funds were made available for a technical assistant to carry out the language
measurements devised by Dr. Jaffe.
E.

Funds:

Foundations' Fund for Research in Psychiatry has granted Dr. Jaffe
continuation
overhead
for
h5,700
a26,000
of
sum
plus
two
the
in
years
support for
the
been
has
developed
during
which
past year.
Dyad"
the
of
"Languahe
the
of
study
FFRP
The
Kaufmann
Foundation.
grant will exthe
This work had been supported by
tend from April 1, 1957 to March 31, 1959.
Health
Mental
fbr
of
National
made
Institute
the
been
to
have
Applications
subthe
Green.
Dr.
protocol
Also,
work
by
undertaken
of
support for the program
of
Division
and
Development
Research
the
to
been
has
sent
Pollack
mitted by Dr.
FoundaMalina
and
the
to
Army,
States
United
the
of
the Surgeon-General's Office
The

tion.

F.

Publications and rresentations:

In November, a summary of our studies on electroshock was presented at the
Montreal
a
in
Association
in
report
American
the
Psychiatric
of
Meeting
Divisional
FollowChange
Behavioral
to
Function
Brain
Altered
entitled "Relation of Tests of
"Electroencephalothe
Green
Dr.
report
December,
presented
Electroshock".
In
ing
Electroenceh
of
Association
Eastern
the
Negimide"
at
of
Lffects
and
Clinical
graphic
studies
during
the
of
electroencephalographic
In
a
summary
February
phalographers.
Differences
in
"Individual
entitled
a
two
in
was
report
presented
the past
years
EEG Besponsivity" before the Metropolitan EEG Society.
The Department has submitted a number of reports to various societies for the
the
at
for
been
have
presentation
accepted
Summer
Papers
and
meetings.
Spring

the
Psychiatry,
of
Biological
Society
the
Research
Association,
Electroshock
International Congress of Psychology and the International Congress for Psychiatry.
American
the
Psysymposia
at
in
to
been
have
invited
participate
In addition, we
These
meetings.
for
Psychiatry
International
Congress
and
chiatric Association
Department
of
this
the
experiences
considerable
detail
summarize
in
reports will
and
to
electroshock
to
with
regard
and
two
one-half
specific
the
years,
past
over
methods
of
the
language
anato
have
we
present
an
opportunity
also
will
drugs.
to
as
some
of
our
speculations
well
as
presenting
Dr.
as
devised
by
Jaffe,
lysis
the role and mode of action of the newer drug therapies in psychiatry.

�G.

Educationi_

Various members of this Department are continuing their education by
formal courses. Dr. H. Korin has been enrolled in courses at the Graduate
School of New York University with specific emphasis on statistics. Dr. J.
Jaffe is completing the formal training requirements at the William Alanson
White Institute of Psychoanalysis. Dr. Robert L. Kahn has been accepted for
training in psychoanalysis at the William Alanson White Institute.
H.

Other Activities:

1.

Israel Strauss

November 1953.

and

Members

Volume:

The

Israel Strauss

Volume appeared

in

of this Department were active in the development

fulfillment of that volume.

2. Resident Training: Since September 1956, two Residents have worked
H.
Esecover has been studying the problem of
Dr.
the
in
Department.
actively
psychotherapy with electroshock patients. In this study he has been supervised
He
made.
has
have
been
number
conclusions
and
of
a
members
the
Deiartment
of
by
demonstrated that patients differ considerably during the electroshock process
and that no single type of psychotherapy is meaningful. Certain supportive and
He is now in the process of
have
value.
definite
may
approaches
interpretive

describing his observations.

Dr. S. Friedman has contributed considerably to the ambivalence study.
this work he was supervised by Dr. Tarachow.

In

During the period September to February, members of the Department participated in a weekly lecture series for the Resident staff on the subjects of
research methodology and newer trends in psychiatry.

Respectfully submitted,
Max
MFzgw

Department of Experimental l’sychiatry
_

ﬂillside Hospital
Glen Oaks,

New

York

Fink,

M.D .

�HILLSIDE

HOSPITAL

FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT. TRAINING AND RESEARCH

JOSEPH S. A. MILLER,

75-59 263m:

M. D.

STREET. GLEN OAKS. NEw YORK
FIELD STONE

Medical Director

LEON

$7500

Lowwsrm

Honorary Chairman
Board of Directors

SIMON KWALWASSER, M. D.

ROY FOSTER

Assoc. Medical Director

Chairman
Board Of Directors

MAURICE BACHRACE

Administrator

E. COLEMAN
President

ALVIN

Dear Sir :

basis for the discussion of the research
activities at the meeting of the Medical Affairs
Committee on Monday, April 8th, I am herewith enclosing the following memoranda=
As a

1. Report of Dr. Fink for the Department of
Experimental Psychiatry.
2. Research activities in the Department of
Biochemistry, by Dr. Harry Goldenberg.

3. Research in the Department of Medicine,
by Dr. Arnold G. Blumberg

Aside from the regular Medical Board members of
the Medical Affairs Coxmnittee, there will also be present
Dr. H. L. Rachlin, Chairman of the Research Comittee of
the Medical Board and Dr. Max Fink, Director of the Department of Experimental t’sychia’cry.
Yours

sincerely,

f4,WIM,

Joseph S.A.Miller, M.D.

JSJALI:

11b

Medical Director

encl.

AN AFFILIATE OF FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK

�April 1, 1957.
MEMORANDUM

TO:

Medical Affairs Committee

FOR:

Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller

FROM:

Department of Experimental Psychiatry

SUBJECT:

Report of Departmental Activities,

September 1956 to April 1, 1957.

Experimental
of
the
Department
of
the
activities
of
following report
since
the
period
ofHDr.
covering
Miller,
the
request
Psychiatry is submitted at
The

September 1956.
A.

Proggess in Ongoing Projects:

the
evaluate
The
signifito
control
study
Evaluation:
1. Electroshock
be
com1956,
will
on
April
1,
instituted
electroshock
therapy,
cant elements in
been
has
studied.
been
have
It
pleted by the end ofTMay 1957. Seventy patients
the
electrointo
insights
have
we
and
significant
gained
a most successful group,
made
1955-56,
in
observation,
the
we
original
verified
shock process. First,
the
deis
electroshock
therapy
behavior
in
in
change
that the prerequisite for
function.
brain
in
and
sustained
alteration
velopment of a significant degree
Under the conditions of altered brain function, however, patients respond in
electroshock
is
follows
that
improvement
the
In
some
patients,
various ways.
that the

was
opinion
our
It
disappears.
rapidly
while
in
others, it
sustained,
observations.
these
in
determinant
instrumental
the
was
patient's personality
in
the
of
patients
the
personality
For this reason we have studied intensively
standard
interview
developed
tests,
this last group. By applying specially
have
we
number
of
questionnaire
tests,
a
and
modifying
psychological tests,
and
of
type
between
personality
the
number
of
relationships
determined a
behavioral
the
we
predicting
are
At
the present time,
behavioral response.
and
during
our
predictions
electroshock
therapy,
to
reSponse of the patients
As
a
result
chance.
than
better
been
have
significantly
the past few months
include
to
personality
extend
study
our
to
we
planning
are
of these Observations,
G).
Section
(see
results
factors in psychotherapy

changes
the
been
perceptual
has
of
patients
Our second interest in this group
deto
able
been
have
we
control
a
group,
induced by electroshock. By virtue of
and
those
treatment
the
to
which
related
are
termine those perceptual changes
imbeen
have
we
In
these
observations,
which are related to practice effects.
and
their
the
of
patients
the
personality
interrelation.of
close
the
pressed by
so
behavior
two
is
of
The
of
these
aspects
interrelation
perceptual processes.
in
differences
individual
of
undertake
study
a
decided
to
close, that we have
under
the
behavior
eventual
to
such
differences
and
to
relate
hope
perception
G).
Section
(see
function
brain
special conditions of altered
which
electroshock
therapy
of
a
concept
to
develop
have
led us
Our studies
Electrotreatment
unit.
this
of
management
the
in
has been of significant help
which
function
brain
in
changes
induces
shock is a non-specific treatment. It
Under
these
two
months.
than
less
of
usually
time,
persist for varying lengths
depending
environment
different
ways
in
his
to
responds
the
patient
conditions,
his
to
he
better
relates
With
certain
a
personality,
upon his personality.

�-2—

family, his therapist, and to other patients. The better that he relates to
other people, the less reason is there for him to become tense, anxious or
depressed. Once the feeling of well-being is set into motion, it is sustained
by the patient's better ability to function with others. Electroshock therapy
is not a specific treatment for a specific form of mental illness.
2. Biochemical Changes in Electroshock: In the course of these studies
of electroshock, we noted that other investigators had reported that there were
Specific changes in enzymes in the spinal fluid after trauma, and one report
noted similar changes after electroshock. Dr. Goldenberg and I undertook a
study of these enzymes in order to verify the previous reports and to clarify
our own picture of the electroshock process. To date, we have collected 30
spinal fluids. I anticipate that this phase of the work will continue until
the end of 1957.
Communication Studies:

interest in

communication problems has
led to two types of studies. Tn one, Dr. J. Jaffe has developed a technique for
the analysis of recorded interviews which provides us with an objective index of
change in behavior. Support for this phase of the work has been obtained from
the Foundations' Fund for Research in Psychiatry. At present, he is analyzing

3.

Our

the recordings of interviews with electroshock patients made earlier in the year,
and his findings are correlating very well with the clinical results. we antiand
the
in
of
language
changes
to
an
technique
analysis
this
applying
cipate
behavior that occur in pa chotherapeutic interviews.

analysis of the structured amytal test interviews according to changes in syntax and content. The original findings of this
study were presented to the American Psychopathological Association in June.
Since then, all our amytal test interviews are being analyzed in like fashion
and the original findings have been verified and amplified. We have come to
understand that the language of our patients tells us readily whether or not
changes have occurred in brain function and in behavior. Furthermore, correlations between the personality evaluations and the language changes have shown
a direct relationship between high degree language changes and certain personality types; and minimalvto-no language changes with other personality types.
Language is thus a recordable facet of behavior and we are optimistic that a
combination of the language analyses developed by Drs. Jaffe and Iahn would be
a meaningful index of changes in behavior applicable to any form of psychiatric
therapy, including psychotherapy.
h. Egrebral Reactivity: As described in the previous report, our
interest in the question of individual variability in cerebral reactivity has
been stimulated by our electroshock studies. One part of this study is the
A
second is the study of the
biochemical
in
of
changes
spinal fluid.
study
rate of development of electroencephalographic change induced by electroshock.
Dr. Green has begun this phase of the work and since September has surveyed all
our electroshock patients by an analysis of their basic EEG records, and their
reSponse to hyperventilation. Also, the cerebral response to Mcgimide has been
assessed and this phase of the work completed (see Section B). Beginning in May,
is anticipated that the laboratory will screen new admissions to the hospital
it
and that various activation procedures will be tested, so that the definitive
study can be undertaken in the Fall.
A

second study

is

a language

Concurrently, Dr. Green has assessed the relationship between the electroshock seizure threshhold and cranial resistance as factors influencing the development of electroencephalographic abnormality. This study is in progress.

�.3’
5. Ambivalence: This study, under the direction of Dr. Sidney TaraNew
York
have
before
been
and
the
the
observations
presented
chow, has continued
Neurological Society in January. The observations have been summarized in a report which will appear shortly in the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry.
B.

Completed Progects:

1. Chlorpromazine-Insulin

Coma:

Control Study: An interim report on the results of this
control study was submitted to the Research Committee of the Medical Board on
January 31, 1957. In this study, 59 patients referred for insulin coma were
divided into two groups - one-half receiving insulin coma and the other half
receiving chlorpromazine therapy. It was our conclusion that chlorpromazine
is as effective in modifying psychotic behavior patterns as insulin coma therapy.
There was a tendency for the discharge ratings to be better fer the chlorprcmazine
we
concluded that, in comparison to insulin
coma
the
than
for
insulin
group.
group
coma therapy, chlorpromazine was safer, easier to administer, more controllable in
had
evidence
concluded
had
no
‘b
that
also
fewer
and
side
apeffects.
its effects,
peared in the fifteen months of the study that either therapy had altered the basic
schizophrenic process, nor did we feel that either form of therapy had a greater
specificity for schizophrenic illnesses. At the conclusion of the study, the
Medical Director placed chlorpromazine in the formulary and permitted its use by
the Resident staff.

Insulin

Coma

2. Megimide Evaluation: During this period, Dr. Green has evaluated a
new agent in electroencephalography, megimide, for its ability to bring out demidTJere
the
The
of
his
findinas
at
presented
function.
brain
in
report
fects
winter meeting of the Eastern.Association of Electroencephalographers.
C.

Projected Studies

7

l9§7~§8:

the
work
now
in
the
in
Department will
that
progress
anticipated
is
It
continue for the remainder of the year. The electroshock evaluation study will
be completed this Spring and the next few months will be spent in correlating

the information obtained and writing the reports. As indicated in the ongoing
and
have
of
studies
these
out
number
of
developments
grown
it
a
progress notes,
is anticipated that these will be incorporated in the active research program.
A
i“Response:
Behavioral
protocol has been
1. lgdividual Differences in
IVia}:
Dr.
Pollack, which incorporates the problem of personality affectdeveloped by
ing individual responsivity to electroshock. By determining the subject's patterns
of perception in specially developed orientation and visual tasks, we hOpe to demonstrate a relationship between these patterns and the behavioral response, both
under the special condition of altered brain function, and the general condition
of hospitalization and psychotherapy. Such a study has bearing on the problems of
the personality aspects of resistance to change in behavior under stressful conditions (as in forceful indoctrination, isolation, starvation); as well as the
definition of suitable candidates for various psychiatric therapies.

2. Personality Factors in Doctor and Patient Affecting Choice of Therapy:
Our experiences with electroshock have led us to a number of hypotheses which relate personality factors in the patient and the therapist affecting the choice of
treatment. We are in the process of developing our ideas into a workable hypothesis.
We anticipate undertaking such a study by the end of the year.
17

,

914.4 f 3
f

1

b

Va.

1,5

_.

�D.

Changes

in Fersonnel:

the
Department
been
as
has
redesignated
section
this
Since the last re ort,
the
time
of
the
at
listed
the
personnel
to
In
addition
of Experimental Psychiatry.
Max
Research
as
Dr.
Pollack,
a
basis,
last report, we have appointed, on part-time
New
York
University
from
Ph.D.
who
has
Dr.
Pollack,
his
Assistant in Psychologr.
and
the
mount
Sinai
Hospital
the
at
in 1955, has been a research psychologist
He
is experienced
six
the
Research
for
past
years.
Ittleson Foundation for Child
he
that
anticipated
is
It
in both personality and perceptual aspects in research.
A program to study the indiJuly
on
basis
lst. on the perceptual and personwill be appointed on a full-time
vidual differences in behavior with Specific emphasis
made
various
been
to
has
and
him
by
application
been
developed
ality aspects has

foundations for support.

Technical
a
the
Department,
to
be
appointed
will
there
Effective April lst,
FFRP
Section
(see
Grant
of
the
Under
terms
the
Assistant for linguistic analyses.
the
language
out
to
assistant
technical
a
carry
made
for
available
E) fUnds were
measurements devised by Dr. Jaffe.
3-

£211.42:

Dr.
Jaffe
has
granted
Fund
Research
Psychiatry
Foundations'
in
for
The
continuation
overhead
for
$5,700
u26,000
of
plus
sum
the
two
years in
support for
the
been
during
past
developed
has
which
year.
Dyad"
the
of
"Languace
the
of
study
FFRP
The
will
Fbundation.
exKaufmann
grant
the
by
been
had
work
supported
This
tend from April 1, 1957 to March 31, 1959.
Health
Mental
for
of
National
made
Institute
the
to
been
Applications have
subthe
Green.
protocol
Dr.
Also,
by
work
undertaken
support for the program of
of
Division
and
Development
Research
the
to
been
sent
mitted by Dr. Pollack has
FoundaMalino
and
the
to
Army,
States
United
the Surgeon-General's Office of the

tion.

F.

Publications and Presentations:

the
at
was
presented
electroshock
on
studies
of
our
In November, a summary
Montreal
a
in
Association
report
in
American
Psychiatric
the
of
Meeting
Divisional
FollowChange
Behavioral
to
Function
Brain
entitled "Relation of Tests of Altered
"Electroencephalothe
Green
report
Dr.
presented
December,
Electroshock".
In
ing
Electroenceb
of
Association
Eastern
the
Megimide"
of
at
graphic and Clinical Lffects
during
studies
electroencephalographic
the
of
In
a
February summary
phalographers.
Differences
in
"Individual
entitled
a
in
report
two
was
presented
the past
years
EEG Besponsivity" before the Metropolitan EEG Society.
the
for
societies
various
to
number
of
submitted
a
reports
The Department has
the
at
for
been
have
presentation
accepted
Summer
meetings. Papers
Spring and
the
Psychiatry,
Biological
of
Society
the
Research
Association,
Electroshock
for
Congress
Psychiatry.
International
and
the
Psychology
of
Congress
International
Psy—
American
the
symposia
at
in
In addition, we have been invited to participate
These
meetings.
for
Psychiatry
International
Congress
and
chiatric Association
Department
of
this
the
experiences
detail
considerable
summarize
in
reports will
and
to
electroshock
to
regard
with
and
one-half
specific
two
years,
over the past
methods
of
anathe
language
to
present
have
we
an
opportunity
also
will
drugs.
to
as
some
of
our
speculations
well
as
presenting
lysis devised by Dr. Jaffe, as
in
psychiatry.
therapies
the
newer
drug
of
mode
and
of
action
the role

�-5G.

Education:

Various members of this Department are continuing their education by
formal courses. Dr. H. Korin has been enrolled in courses at the Graduate
School of New York University with specific emphasis on statistics. Dr. J.
Jaffe is completing the formal training requirements at the William Alanson
White Institute of Psychoanalysis. Dr. Robert L. Kahn has been accepted for
training in psychoanalysis at the William Alanson White Institute.
H.

Other Activities:

1. Israel Strauss Volume:

November 1955.

and

Members

The

Israel Strauss

Volume appeared

in

of this Department were active in the development

fulfillment of that volume.

2. Resident Training: Since September 1956, two Residents have worked
H.
Dr.
Esecover has been studying the problem of
the
in
Departnent.
actively
psychotherapy with electroshock patients. In this study he has been supervised
He
has
made.
have
been
number
and
conclusions
of
a
members
of the Department
by
demonstrated that patients differ considerably during the electroshock process
and that no single type of psychotherapy is meaningful. Certain supportive and
He
of
the
now
have
in
value.
is
definite
process
may
approaches
interpretive

describing his observations.

Dr. S. Friedman has contributed considerably to the ambivalence study.
this yprk he was supervised by Dr. Tarachow.

In

During the period September to February, members of the Department participated in a weekly lecture series for the Resident staff on the subjects of
research methodology and newer trends in psychiatry.

Respectfully submitted,
Max
MFzgw

Department of Experimental i"sychiatry
&gt;

hillside Hospital
Glen Oaks,

New

York

Fink, M.D.

�April 1, 1957
Medical Affairs Cummittee

TO:

For: Dr. Joseph S.A.Miller
From:

Department of Biochemistry

Subject:

Report of Departmental Activities, July 1956 to March 31, 1957.

Steroid Studies
Studies were continued on the steroid hormones because of their importance
in the physiological response to stress. Experiments with rats showed that the
liver converts neutral and sex hormones to their sulfate conjugates which are
subsequently voided in the urine. Female rat~ liver was far more active than
male preparations in conjugating the steroids, particularly the male hormones.
These findings indicate that the liver plays a major role in the maintaining
hormonal balance, femalssbeing endowed with a regulatory device to dispose of
excess male hormones produced in their bodies.
Urinary steroid sulfate excretion studies on human subjects were carried out
The
and
total
chromatographic
techniques.
complexation
with our newly developed
sulfate output was found to be related to both sex and age. Interesting results
were obtained with urine from schizophrenics, the level of one fraction (dehydronumber
of cases.
elevated
sulfate)
in
a
being
epiandrosterone
Drugs and Alkaloids
New

colorimetric, chromatographic

electrophoretic techniques were establipsychothenpeutic drugs. These were recently

and

for both the psychotomimetic and
presented at the American Chemical Society
shed

Meeting (Brooklyn, February 15, 1957).

findings are now being applied to determining the role of trace urinary alkaloids in schizophrenia.
our earlier chlorpromazine studies, which were dropped for lack of suitable
instrumentation, are again under way with financial help from the National Institutes
much
throws
because
The
of
interest
it
light on
Health.
is
ver
great
of
subject
from
the
be
which
cannot
gained
(microsome
action
gross liver
function
liver
function tests in currentuse. we find the chlorpromazine molecule is in many ways
The
from
information
gleaned
to
some
in
isotopes.
ways
ideal
superior
an
tracer,
this study would also throw light on the Akerfeldt "six~minute blood test for
from
whether
suffer
a
decide
schizophrenics
should
to
and
us
help
schizophrenia"
defect in oxidative metabolism leading to the in vivo production of hailucinogens.
The

Electroshock
Lavels
Therapy.
in
gholinesterase

Earlier investi ations by Tower and others have indicated demonstrable changes
in acetylcholine, acetylcholinesterase, and pseudocholinesterase in spinal fluid
following electroshock therapy as well as other forms of head trauma. AccordingEEG
of
have
to
correlate
undertaken
Fink
patients
and
Ur.
patterns
associates
ly,
EST
values
cholinesterase
in
concurrent
and
with
alterations
after
during
before,
of spinal fluid. Simultaneous serum cholinesterase determinations on these patients
blood
red
to
extend
these
studies
and
cell
we
to
carried
plan
also
being
out,
are
(true)cholinesterase. The specific enzyme methods in use were developed at Hillside
Hospital and have recently been presented at the American Chemical Society Meeting
in Brooklyn. Further reference is made to Dr. Fink's progress report for findings
to date.
Future plans:

More

of the same.

Harry Goldenberg, Ph.D.

�April 1, 1957.
Medical Affairs Committee

TO

For: Dr. Joseph S.A.Miller
From:

Department of'Medicine

subject:

Report of Departmental Activities, July 1956 to March 31, 1957.

to
of
An
the
patients
of
psychiatric
Test:
response
l. Mecholylof mecholyl analysis
between
correlation
a
revealed
has
striking
subcutaneously
injections
electroshock
to
and
therapy.
and
diagnosis
response
age,
response
have
machine
blood
recording
automatic
of
an
studies
pressure
2. Preliminary
machine
for
and
of
this
the
evaluate
practicability
to
out
accuracy
been carried
now
seems
As
these
of
result
a
studies,
the
work
mecholyl
it
test.
on
further
of
the
evaluate
to
used
be
reproducibility
machine
usefully
can
likely that this
the mecholyl

test.

3. Drug evaluation studies on meprobamate are being carried out.
h. Chemical studies with the laboratory department are being conducted on possible
hepato-toxic effects of chlorpromazine in our patients.
Proposed Research for the coming year:

1. Evaluation of meprobamate in psychiatric patients.
three months).
2.

(to be completed within

Evaluation of reproducibility of mecholyl test employing a recording sphygmo-

mamometer.

by
chromatographic
with
therapy
chlorpromazine
alterations
of
Evaluation
3.
protein
techniques.

h. Evaluation of
or Trilafon.

a

substitute fbr chlorpromazine. This will be either Spaﬁine
Arnold Blumberg, M.D.

�HILLSIDE

HOSPITAL

FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT. TRAINING AND RESEARCH

JOSEPH S. A. MILLER,

75-59 263RD

M. D.

STREET. GLEN OAKS. NEw YORK
FIELDSTONE

Medical Director

LEON LOWENSTEIN

3-7800

Honorary Chairman
Board of Directors

M. D.
Assoc. Medical Director

SIMON KWALWASSER,

ROY FOSTER

Chairman
Board of Directors

MAURICE BACHRACH

E. COLEMAN
President

Administrator

ALVIN

A

Proposed Study

for the Behavioral

Max

From

Assay of

New

Drugs

Fink M.D.

the Department of Experimental PBychiatny

October 30, 1957.

AN AFFILIATE OF FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK

�AProposed Study for theBehavi9ralwg§§ay of

New

Dm
mgs

MaxFi‘nk M.D. *

1 . Problem:

is little disagreement that the newer psychopharmamode
of
these
drugs
of
action
the
behavior,
alter
cological agents
and factors in the marked individual variability in response are
unresolved problems. Difficulty in resolving these problems lies,
While there

in part, in the lack of a theoretic framework subject to operational
the
is
assay
perplexing
and
Particularly
experimentation.
analysis
of new, i;g., clinically untested agents capable of altering behavior.
Many

the
because
reports are
to
assess
studies
difficult
are
present

and
classifications
nosologic
defined;
the
poorly
population
subjective;

are unsatisfactory.
Based on our previous

studies,

we have

expressed the hypothesis

that the efficacy of psychopharmacological agents in psychotic states
measurable
changes
induce
to
persistent
to
their
related
ability
is
in cerebral function (1). Such alteration in cerebral function provides the milieu for changes in adaptation of the patient in his
environmento

In this view, alterations in cerebral function following

drug administration are not "complications," or "untoward

but the sing

SEE

293 of the

mode

effects,"

of action of these therapies.

Changes

condition
not
sufficient
but
a
a
cerebral
are
physiology
in
necessary,

for improvement.
* Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, N.Y.

�,2This hypothesis

is

a direct outgrowth of four years of experimental

investigations of electrcconvulsive, insulin

coma and

various drug

therapies in use at Hillside Hospital. These studies are summarized

in the appended report (1).
we have used a wide

t

variety of measures of brain function

(2, 3, h, 10, 12). Most successful have been changes in the frequency
spectrum of the

EEG,

patterns of language and perceptual tasks. In

our experiences with electroshock, slowing of
most

EEG

frequencies has been

helpful (2). In drug studies, however, this is less prominent,

although fundamental; Language and perceptual

tests,

however, have

given us clues as to ways of measuring brain changes, more subtle than

present electroencephalographic techniques.

It is

this study to
logic agents according to their effects
the purpose of

patterns and

on

perceptual tasks.

to test the following:

The

compare various psychopharmacoon

the

study

EEG, on

language

is specifically

designed

I

(a) Can the extent of behavioral change in psychopharmacologic
agents be related to the degree of
(b)

To

EEG

spectrum changes?

what extent can visual discrimination

measures of changes in language be

tests, and
refined to provide reliable,

predictablezueasures of changes in clinical behavior?
(c)

To what

extent can such measures predict the clinical

usefulness of psychopharmacologic agents?

�II.

Method:

1. Subjects:
All subjects are

drawn from the

adult impatient service

of the Hillside Hospital.

In general, these patients are

erative, well educated
good physical health.

intelligent. All are

and

alert,

coopT

ambulatory and in

2. Procedure:
Two

methods of drug assay are

in progress.

(a) Acutg_Experiments:

In the laboratory setting, with simultaneous

EEG

and

language recording in process, single intravenous or oral doses of
drugs are administered.

the period of drug

Patients are under constant observation for

activity.

(b) Clinical Experiments:

Patients are referred

by

their therapist to the super-

vising psychiatrist for treatment with psychopharmacologic agents.
Prior to drug administration,

EEG

and language recording interviews

are held. Perceptual tasks are completed. Drug administration then

until toxicity is manifest, and drug
reduced to a maintenance dose. Testing is repeated, and be-

proceeds
dosage

at

a rapid increment

havioral observations made, at frequent, defined intervals.

in previousstudies, subjects are randomly divided into

As

groups

-

an experimental and a

control.

The

experimental group

receives the medication, the control group placebo medication.

two

�3. measurements:
(a)

33.29.

is

Recording with an 8 channel Medcraft instrument

in progress. Records have been visually analyzed for changes in
frequency, voltage, symmetry and rhythmicity (2). Activation by
hyperventilation is routine.

validity of other activating
and
photic
hypoglycemia
megimide
(6),
intravenous
as
procedures
The

stimulation is being assessed.
(b) Perceptual.
Within the past decade certain perceptual procedures
have been shown to be

(11, 12, 13).

sensitive measures of cerebral dysfunction

Such techniques as

critical flicker fusion

(OFF), and

"embedded"
of
figures
polychromatic
the tachistoscopic recognition

in a
These

visual background are being assessed (10, 12, 13).
measures have the adVantage of giving a reliable quantitative

complex

measure of pretreatment functioning

in terms of a continuous variable,

rather than the qualitative dichotomy of "normal" versus "abnormal;"
imposing no undue

stress

on the

patient;

and the apparatus and

pro-

relatively inexpensive.
1) Critical flicker fusion SCFFZ: As the rate of
the
that
the
illusion
there
develops
of
increased,
flicker light is
point
this
at
of
The
the
light
flickering
frequency
steady.
is
light
cedure are simple, convenient and

is

the CFF. The

CFF

threshold is measured using a Sylvania glow

ratio is
brightness is varied to robtain thresholds at different

tube pulsed by an electronic power supply. The light—dark

fixed,

and

�-5-

levels.

The psychophysical method of

is

descending steps

limits using ascending

and

employed.

2) Tachistoscopic recognition of pseudoisochromatic

gigures:

The H—R-R

pseudoisochromatic plates (American Optical Company) con~

sisting of a series of cards with numerous small circles of various
sizesare used. The circles vary in color, and form outlines of
various geometric patterns, as ring, cross and triangle. These

patterns form a "figure"

on a

constant background. The

"neutral" plates are recognized by

all subjects -

blind." These plates have been photographed and
projection slides.

initial

normal and "color-

mounted as 2" x 2"

of exposure which permits accurate

The speed

identification of the figure is the index used.
(0)

Eggggggg.

Interviews with patients are recorded. Both unstructare
The
records
analyzed
included.
and
ured
structured periods are

for diversity (7) of the dyadic speech.
been found useful in analysis of changes in

for changes in syntax (9),
These methods have

and

behavior with other therapies.
(d) Evaluation of

clinical changes.

Psychiatric evaluations are

made

at fixed intervals

as to type and degree of changes in behavior, and a rating of
"improvement"
and

is

made.

in "improvement" are

The methods
now

of rating both change in behavior

under study.

Present ratings have been

based on the Malamud-Sands Rating Scales and have been of limited

usefulness.

The

present descriptive statements of the evaluator,

�-6following an outline of specific areas of behavior combined with
a review of the nurses' and resident

therapist's notes is being

continued.

h. Pharmacologic Agents:
Previous experience with amobarbital (8), megimide (6),

reserpine (IA) and chlorpromazine (5) provides the background for
the selection of new agents. At present, acute study of diethazine
(SKF 1026-A)

is in progress. Clinical studies of

meprobamate,

perphenazine and chlorpromazine are under investigation.
have been formulated

reaponse.

to test other agents, with different

spectral

Available:

The Department

of Experimental Psychiatry was established at the

Hillside Hospital in l95h.

clinical duties.

EEG

.

-

III. Facilities

Plans

of the department have no

Members

They devote

their full

at the institution to

time

the research prognmns.

Eight rooms of laboratories and offices in the principle medical

building of the hospital are provided. These include:
a)

EEG

Laboratory - equipped with Medcraft

encephalograph and Grass photic-stimulator.
on a

A

8

channel Electro-

technician is employed

full-time research basis.
b)

Psychophysical Laboratory

-

Two

Grass stimulators, Dumont

oscilloscope and step-up transformer power supply in a rack-mounted
assembly.

This equipment has been used for the past three years to

study threshold
and

after

for

simultaneous

tactile stimuli of patients before

induced states of altered cerebral function.

�.37.-

A

tachistoscopic assembly consisting of

two

projectors,

solenoidaactivated shutters, and opal glass screen is in use.
c) Psxcholinggistic Laboratogz:

A

third laboratory has been

established for the recording of interviews.
a Magnecord tape

recorder,

two

It is

equipped with

and
mixer.
microphones,
Electrovoice

auxilliary recorders for transcription are available.
The
available
for
study.
All patients in the hospital are
research programs have been well integrated into the hospital

Two

milieu so that manipulation of experimental variables are readily
accomplished.

�and Reggrts:

Iv. Publications

l.
2.

of
Physiodynamic
Action
of
the
Unified
Theory
Fink,
Therapies, J. Hillside Hosp. (in press).
M. : A

and Kahn, R.L.:' Relation of EEG Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative
Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and Pachiat.

(in press).

3.
h.

m:

Diffuse
of
Effects
and
H.:
Korin,
,
Altered Brain Function in Perception. Read at XV Int'l
Congress of Paychology, Brussels, 1957.
,

:

,

Relation of Tests of

Altered Brain Function to Behavioral Change Following
mectroshock. Read at the A.P.A. Divisional Meeting,
Montreal, November, 1956.

5.

and Coleman, F.S.:
Coma
and
Insulin
of
Chlorpromazine
Comparative Study
in the Therapy of Psychosis, J. Amer. Med. Assoc.

, Shaw, R., Cross,

6.,

(in press).

6. Green,

Fink, M.:

Megimide, EEG.

7.

Jaffe, J.:

Clinical Effects of

W

M.A. and
An

EEG

and

Clin. Neuromvsiolu g: 180-181, 1957.

Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric

Interviews, J. Hillside Hosp. (in press).
8. Kahn, R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of
Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electro8c Psvchiat.
1956.
23-29,
Meurol.
A.M.A.
Arch.
lé:
shock,
9.

10.

ll.

Durinf-j Ele ctroLanguage
Changes
in
,
of Cormnunication,
shock Therapy, in P cho tholo
Ein
press).
Crune and Stratton
:

Em‘oedded Figures After
of
Perception
,
Induced Altered Brain Function, Am. Psychol” 1.3: 361
(Abst.) 1957.
:

Effects of Visual, Vestibular and Somatosensorimotor Deficit on Autokinetic Perception, J. @332.
§_2_: 398~LLlO, 1956 (with Battersby, 11.3.,
Pszchol.,

Pollack,

Mr:

Kahn, R.L. and Bender, 15.8.)

�0-9-

12. Pollack, M.: Tachistoscopic Identification of Contour in
Patients with Brain Damage, J, Cam . Ph 101.
szchol., 50: 220-227, 1957, {with Battersby,‘W.S.
and Bender, M.B.)

13.

Visual Deficit After Brain Damage in Man
as Measured with Rapidly Exposed Chematic Stimuli,
Amer. Peyphol., 12: h68,(Abst.) (with Battersby,‘w.s.
:

and Bender, M.B{7:

1h. WachSpress, M., Blumberg, A.G., Fink, M. and Miller,J.S.A.:
Evaluation of High Dose Reserpine Therapy for Relief
of Anxiety, J. Hillside HOSE. 5: 67-77, 1956.

�.10V.

Financial Support:
Support for the ongoing programsof the Department of Experimental

'

Psychiatry

is

provided by U.S, Public Health M-927, (Altered Brain

Function Following Electroshock), the Foundations' Fund for Research

in Psychiatry grant 56-151

(Language of the Dyed), and the Board of

Directors' Research Fund.

The

proper development of the specific

aspects of this protocol require support for the following, for a
two

year period.

19 8

Dr. M. P01130k, PhoD.
Senior Research Asst. Psychology
EEG

$
_

Technician - Hrs. Hannah Hosquera

12§9

8,250

$
‘

8,750

3,720

3,8u0

2,000

2,000

50

th

50

th

200

300

Equipment: (Over 2 year period).

Analyzer (Edin)
Flicker Fusion Apparatus

EEG

Projector, Slides
Calculator

(h,000)
(800)
(100)
(880)

hDO

hOO

Travel:
)
(Amer. Psychol. Assoc.
(Amer. Psychiatric ASSOC.)

$ 15,060

Overhead (15%)
TOTAL

$

d

15,h80

2,26h

2,327

17,32h

n 17,807

'

�\

KILLSIIE mSPITAL
Glen Oaks, NOYO

January 27, 1958.
MORAN!!! '10:

Medical Affairs Committee

FOR:

Joseph

FRCM:

Merimental Psychiatry
1958.
January
1957
1,
to
1,
Report of Activities, April

Miller,

M.D.

Deparhxent of

SUBJECT:

I.

30 A.

-~.—--

INTROIIJCTION:

achieved
has
professional
work
Department
the
of
the
nine
months,
In the past
various
of
understanding
We
our
reflecting
have
presented reports
recognition.
and
these
and
international
societies,
national
before
physiodynamic therapies
October
the
in
work
were
presented
of
Five
our
aspects
have been well received.
psychiatric
by
been
leading
have
accepted
and
other
Journal
reports
the
of
issue
Journals and will appear in 1958-59.
convulmode
of
of
action
the
of
Our studies have given us a clear picture
confidence
to
has
us
given
information
ibis
coma
and
therapies.
insulin
sive
to
these
in
therapies
which
were
fruitful
and
techniques
extend the hypotheses
behavioral
concerning
a
ideas
in
protocols
have
expressed our
drug therapy. We
Psychothe
both
by
received
been
well
These
having
new
ideas,
of
drugs.
assay
comand
various
pharmaceutical
U.S.P.H.S.
the
of
Center
Research
pharmacology
1958.
for
studies
new
the
in
been
implemented
have
panies,
.

, .
therapy, we were

,

.

.

number
a.
of
ancillary
led
to
electroshock
In evaluating
The
value
for
psychiatry.
have
which
basic
significance
broad,
investigations
found
and
assessed
were
change
behavioral
of
indices
of language measures as
While
a
studied.
"improvement"
was
The
of
defining
problem
satisfactory.
been
has
approach
operational
an
accomplished,
not
was
satisfactory resolution
which
the
criteria
Also,
studies.
recent
defined which was successful in our
has
an
to
led
Hillside
at
various
the
therapies
for
determine patient referral
of
choice
therapy.
factors
and
affecting
psychologic
the
sociologic
evaluation of

In addition, the ability of this department personnel to work together has
been
have
the
in
hospital
and
Our
relationships
roles
been amply demonstrated.
hosthe
from
at
staffs
all
cooperation
excellent
defined and we have received

pital.
II. PROGRESS IN
(A)

ONGOING PROJECTS:

Therapy Evaluations:

l.

Flectroshock.

We
electroshock
therapy.
Our studies have defined the process of
physiology;
brain
in
induced
changes
the
to
behavioral
the
have related
response
behavioral
of
the
type
affect
that
and
factors
sociologic
described personality
and
clinical
behavioral
between
response
the
and
defined
relationship
response;
of
various
the
types
to
relate
us
These
studies
permit
ratings of improvement.
PM
1090), electroshock and its varieties,
(metrazol
3,
convulsive therapy as drug
"convulsive
there.
of
concept
(Indoklon)
meaningful
into
a
and lately, inhalant
,

pies '.

�-2Based on these studies, reasonable criteria for the type of patient
"do well" with convulsive therapy can be defined. Continuing studies

will
behavioral
the
in
of
role
the
personality
amplify
designed.to
in this area are
non-electroshock
referbetween'out-patient
differences
the
define
to
response;
convulsive
inhalant
of
and
evaluation
an
(IIIc)
rals and in~patient populations
'

who

therapy (111a).
2.

.

£235 Therapy.

control
coma-chlorpromazine
insulin
of
conclusion
our
the
Following
1958.
and
.A.M.A.
in
early
will
appear
study, our report was accepted by he J
the
experimental
program.for
have
developed
a
we
months,
six
the
During
past
which
begun
was
(see
IIIb),
agents
psychopharmacological
new
of
evaluation
3.

Selection of therapies:

of
the
based
on
type
generally
is
of
therapy
While the selection
the
Such
as
aspects
decisions.
such
affect
factors
mental disorder, other
and
cultural
education
his
communicate
verbally,
to
facility of the patient
have
we
and
been
have
studied,
"authoritarianism”
background, and the degree of
rebear
significant
a
and
aspects
psychologic
such
historical
reported that
These
services.
for
ancillary
lationship to the choice of therapy or referral
of
the
in
factors
these
of
results
studies have led to an interest in the role
socioof
role
the
evaluate
further
to
therapy, and we have designed a study
(see
IIIc).
and
therapy
outpatient
of
inpatient
psychologic factors in results
(B)

Language as measurable behavior:

one.
complex
"in
is
a
'improvement
psychiatry
of
definition
and
change
behavioral
of
In evaluation of various therapies, the definition
have
sought
we
adequate,
are
While
descriptions
clinical
improvement is crucial.
Two
methods
of
our
behavior
patients.
the
language
in
guides
more
objective
for
interviews
of
structured
analysis
of analyses have been developed - a syntactic
and a dyadic of unstructured.
The

non-convulsive
and
convulsive
induced
by
changes
have described the
do
clinical
reflect
patterns
these
language
therapy, and find that changes in
to
these
techniques
of
the
have
application
to
led
Our
experiences
evaluation.
We

the drug evaluation studies.
effort
in
an
in
are
of
progress
language
other
analyses
In addition,
methods.
the
of
present
the
broaden
applicability
to
(C)
Neurophysiology of Behavior:
the
between
relationship
the
noted
we
In the electroshock studies
We
concluded
behavioral
response.
the
and
change
neurophysiologic
of
degree
and
behavior
in
change
to
a
essential
was
physiology
cerebral
in
change
that a
coma
therapy.
insulin
for
conclusion
We
same
the
come
had
to
to "improvement".
chlorpromazine
in
treatment
the
response
between
Since we had observed a similarity
was
mode
action
of
same
the
that
seemed
plausible
therapy and insulin coma, it
drugs.
newer
tranquilizing
the
for
operative

�-3review of the literature and some preliminary experiments supported
the
to
potent
are
agents
psychopharmacologic
newer
the
that
this hypothesis We
have
function.
brain
and
affect
predictably
extent that they measurably
and
in
of
Psychiatry
Congress
International
the
at
hypothesis
this
expressed
new
undertaken
have
we
As
a
a
Hillside
the
Hospital.
result,
the Journal of
(see
IIIb).
various
drugs
therapies
evaluating
project
.A

Concomitantly, our interest has continued in the biochemistry of
convulsive therapy. we have observed that diethazine, a potent anticholinergic
demonstrated
has
a
Further
analysis
electroshock
effect.
the
drug, reverses
These
observadiethazine.
LSDHZS
to
and
mescaline
between
marked similarity
as
system
cholinesterase-acetylcholine
the
of
confirm
the
significance
tions
which
behavior
of
psychotic
the
type
a basic mechanism for psychotic behavior may be affected by convulsive therapy.

Percgption:

(D)

have
change
behavioral
of
index
an
as
studies of perceptual tests
continued. We have defined the relationship between the degree of perceptual
demonstrated
Our
have
studies
function.
alteration and the degree of altered brain
Our

but
the
response,
in
perceptual
only
not
type
of
personality
the significance
also in the physiologic response, to convulsive therapy.
Our studies of tactile perception clarified the role of strength of
stimulus and of the type of instructions (set) in the reported reponses.

Individual Differences in Behavioral Responses:
The program of study of the ways in which individual differences in
various
to
of
subjects
and
affect
response
physiology
the
perception, personality
of
neurophysiologic
Green's
Dr.
studies
under
well
way.
is
psychiatric therapies
Dr.
emphasis
and
Pollack's
EEG
electroshock,
to
the
response
differences affecting
of
the
both
phase
in
are
drug
to
therapies
on perceptual aspects as they relate
collecting data in consecutive groups of subjects.
(E)

III.
(A)

New

Pro ects - Pro am.l 8

Inhalant Convulsive Therapz:

In the studies of electroshock, we have been puzzled by the significance
of the electric current in the treatment response. In the convulsive-subconvulsive
was
aftreatment
the
for
response
seizure
the
of
the
control study,
significance
compound,
inhalant
an
Recently,
clear.
not
was
current
of
the
role
but
firmed,
conﬂescribed
simple
was
as
a
safe,
of
ether
anesthesia,
the
to
ethyl
similar
vulsant. We visited the laboratory at Spring Grove State Hospital, Maryland, We
and observed the treatment. It was reliable, quick and easy for the patient.
have obtained a supply of this compound and are undertaking a study on February
of
biochemical
and
effects
psychologic
of
neurophysiologic,
the
clinical,
lst,
convulsive therapy using this compound.
(B)

Mbde

of Action of Psychophammaoologic agents:

experiences with other forms of therapy have led us to formulate a
the
In
agents.
essence,
psychopharmacologic
(see
IIc)
regarding
hypothesis
and
kind
of
effect
the
degree
to
related
behavior
which
is
affect
drugs
to
degree
EEG.
Fbr
this
the
purpose,we
by
measurable
in
part,
brain
have
on
function,
they
and
personnel
equipment
for
special
obtained
and
support
have written a protocol
from.the U.S.P.H.S. and various pharmaceutical concerns.
Our

�-l+-

In these studies, patients referred for drug therapies, as chlorpromazine,
promazine, reserpine, meprobamate, etc. , undergo special tests before and during
treatment, which may predict and reflect the treatment response.
(0) Psychologic and Sociologic Factors in Out Patient Therapy;

result of our studies in inpatients defining certain psychologic
sociologic factors as they affect treatment choice and treatment response,
As a

and
we have made predictions regarding the outpatient population.
to undertake a sociologic study of outpatients, and extend our

studies this Spring.
IV.
(A)

W318

We

are planning

inpatient

AND. I’UBLICATIONS:

Eigerimental Psychiatry Issue, Journal of Hillside Hospital:

of this Department wrote five
articles reflecting various aspects of our study program for the October 1957
issue of the Journal. This encompassed the whole issue. Such an effort is
unique in the Journal‘s history.
At Dr. Tarachow's

(B)

invitation,

members

Publications:

In addition to these five articles, our report on the relation between
EEG changes and treatment response in electroshock appeared in the Archives of
Neurology and Psychiatry. Seven other reports have been accepted for publi cation and two others are in the hands of editors as of January let.
(G)

Presentations:

Reports of our studies have been presented to psyc iatric, neurologic
and psychologic societies. Twelve reports were made before National societies
in the U.S. and three before International Congresses in Brussels and Zurich
during the summer. These reports have been generally well received.
V.

PERSONNEL:

changes in personnel have been made. We have requested, and the Research
Committee and Medical Director have approved, a restatement of the titles for
staff members from "Research Assistant" and "Senior Research Assistant" to
"Research Associate". The present staff consists of nine members including:
No

Martin A. Green, M. D.
Joseph Jaffe, M. D.
Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Hyman Korin, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Associate (Neurophysiology)
- Research
"
"
(Psychiatry)
-"
"
"
(Experimental Psychology;
"
"
(Experimental Psychology
"
"
(Ehcperimental Psychology)
-

and four technical assistants: Mrs. Hannah Mosque'ra (EEG) , Mrs. Jean Kolodw
and Mrs. Ann Horowitz(~?sycholinguistics) and Mrs. Janet Bowie (Secretary).

�-5VI.
(A)

TENTﬁIIVE BUDGEE PROJECTION:

1228-52.

Personnel:

In addition to the personnel listed above, we will request the addition
of a Research.Associate in Social Psychology; and a redesignation of the halftime neurophysiologist to a full-time status. These items will increase the
budget by $9500 above authorized annual increments for ongoing personnel.
(B)

Supplies.

Em

ment and Travel:

There will be an increase of $l000 in supplies and travel and a specific
equipment expense of $5200 for an EEG Analyzer. This instrument will provide
greater flexibility in EEG analysis. A supplementary request for this amount
has been asked of the U.S.P.H.S.
L

Total Egpensesz

(C)

av"

.

total

expenses for 1958-59
1957-58, an increase of $16,98h.
The

(D)

will be $95,796. as against $78,812

k"

"u.

Income:

In the past six months, this Department has been more successful than
anticipated in attracting research funds from private and governmental sources.
Fbr the current year, we anticipated $33,595 and so far have been advised that
we can expect $h3,h31 for 1957-58, an increase of $9,836 over expectations.
Fbr 1958-59; we have already been assured of $50,66h which is $7,233
more than 1957-58. It may be of interest that we already have funds for 1959-60
in the amount of $15,297. These grants totalling $115,235 have been made available to the Department for the period April 1, 1957 to December 1960.

Max

Mszb/b

Fink,

M. D.

A}\

fork¢3”4
We

Respectfully submitted,

V‘

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67274">
                <text>Progress and annual reports; research activities (folder title).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67275">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67276">
                <text>mfp-03-01-001-0-005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67277">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67278">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67279">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67280">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67281">
                <text>Letters; Personality factors in behavioral response to electroshock therapy (draft) by Robert L. Kahn and Max Fink;  Progress reports of departmental activities; A proposed study for the behavioral assay of new drugs by Fink; Report of activities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67282">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67283">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80930">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87491">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94052">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100613">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6729" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3785">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e160cd659a1c0564650ed815c2ffda05.pdf</src>
        <authentication>287e408e3d76bfef4519f4c1ea5b9ae6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="104411">
                    <text>(
g

,
a

n

I

E

.
!
r

l
,
E

i
P

me:
plated the
70110113;

Wt.
it. own»

1957. tho

ﬁrst wu-

of

of

W

mun-y oa-

of tho clan-pu- of

natal 1.1an“.

WW
with. W,
mun-mm-m

m mum

of th- buio

and

We”

pm
dandy!” wmmuﬁow WW $81957. m: CW
Mtnmwwmmtmunuhanmmmw
has. at an

a:

0.

mm}.

6103111

”My
W; N's-pm“
m
“ﬁrm"
mmuhm-M

muum

m
may.

for

in

and tho

«01015310

at!

rum-Mu, mmmacnzwm
mmtarmmmmmummmmm
can control study.
an. anon-mud in

6110me
Wanna Maturation, nWtdﬁzomuuﬂmd

Geno

a»

m
In.
3mm
mm, W
nun mum. mm.
m magma“,
manur- m mum

(Imp

and

0!

o.

with

the

Ward am

of nut

11.“.qu of we:

Into

applying

an

Into pitta-n- of cannula-ﬂan comma.
obs-euro mined: at
«unique! of

and

h

mmmWWu-W-mmmwm
when; mud. aunnmummmmpum. mn-

We
Wc
wimp-MW" mm,mummwsnmmnud
and

m

induced

mum

bu» for

continua.

mm

which“!

1n

mp”.

�.g......__‘-_,

&lt;. .

r._wr..v,... a.“

..

.

an“...

~.

My;

’1‘...” w

V

“rpm—c. v..-.~7.vv....v

”my—W..- m- 7 ~-‘ _ V-

w..."

,___ w'J—ln'n

.. ,_

—.-‘

\ ,u.,, .N

nu

.

vvvwmr

,.

»

w..,.._.v.....

d.
mummdthonmm,
unmask-Wt.
that
ad
{in
Was: manna. What“
umm
Journal
tho
of
thfor
'hponmnul
um
unk).
we)...
Why"

m

of tho

é

:

mnm- Hospital. ﬂu sun and“:

m “aA.

m,
W
am.
um
lab-n
11.9.

Edi.

11.».

m,
Ill: mm, m.
“lemma.
I»

Bub.

"

-

-..

_,

“mt mu (Wong)

W
"

"

*

.u

"

I

(me)
(Noun-um Why)
_

“

-

a

wzutmpmmwmmayuM7

E

i

‘

amurmwmmunnahrmummm,m
hum). mum at rum mu. an Wanna cm» at
munmmmanummmmumm.
mm,
mm
.

w m.

E

“n.—

ﬁ__.__4w-~m_——__V

O

”in.

n

,. —

�Richard Weiner

FROM:

FOR RELEASE

FINN INCORPORATED
13u.East 59 Street

RUDER &amp;

MAX

York 22, New York
PLaza 9-1800

New

FOR:

7, 1958

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

A

Island psychiatrist whose research points to the underlying

Long

changes necessary to reverse the depressive type of mental
honored

this

Dr.

week by

Max

be

Fink, Director of the Department of Experimental Psychiatry

at Hillside Hospital,
A. E.

illness will
a major national psychiatric association.
Glen Oaks (Queens),

New

York,

will receive the first

Bennett Neuropsychiatric Research Foundation Award. The Society of

fé

Biological Psychiatry will present the award at the group's 13th Annual
Meeting in San Francisco, California, on May 11.

The meeting

is part of

:
'1‘

the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting.
Dr. Fink will present a paper on his work

Cholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on

EEG

titled, "Effect of Anti-

and Behavior:

Significance for

Theory of Convulsive Therapy."
The

report describes experimental studies of the neurophysiologic

for "shock" therapies. Dr. Fink and his associates
at Hillside Hospital have observed that changes inla specific enzyme

and biochemical bases

system of the brain, acetylcholine-cholinesterase, are intimately

to improvement in electroshock.

However, changes

related

in the opposite direction

are accompanied by hallucinations, delusions, and psychotic behavior.

that decrease the activity of the acetylcholine normally present,
in the brain excite psychotic activity. They also reverse the electroshock
Drugs

effect.

Some

of the newer hallucinogens, such as lysergic acid

(LSD) and

,

�-2mescaline, are most potent in this regard.

halts the hallucinogenic action of these
shock effect.
The

On

the other hand, chlorpromazine

compounds and enhances

Hillside research extends the understanding of the

the electro-

mode

of action

of convulsive therapies by defining the biochemical bases for the observed

neurophysiologic effects.
The

studies have been supported by the National Institute of Mental

Health and the Board of Directors' Research Fund of Hillside Hospital.
Dr. Fink is Secretary of the Section of Convulsive Disorders and

Brain Function of the American Psychiatric Association and President-

Elect of the Nassau Neuropsychiatric Society.

Hillside Hospital, an affiliate of the Federation of Jewish

is a non—profit, non-sectarian hospital
for psychiatric treatment, training and research.

Philanthropies of

New

York,

####

�_

»‘.&gt;\7"»

&gt;v.—

'—

~v-

16

Peace Missionary May
;’Have to Pacify “Family
'

i

i

.

'

i

Mrs. Lola Stone, pretty young Long Island. housewife
who’s on an interna—
tional peace mission to ban nuclear
tests, may have some pacifying to do when she
gets home.
The husband and two children of the globe-trotting
proud of her campaign, but they miss her and Wish she’d 'peace missionary are
hurry home to Kanes
Lane, Huntington Bay.
,

.TA Reiecis

1

"‘We think she’s wonderful,
we’re quite proud of her, but it
urts some time,” her husband,
Robert, said with a smile.
‘We’re counting the days.”
Mrs. Stone is one of a group
of five pacifists on a 4,000-

Protest

mile tour of European capitals
‘

By MBA

‘

They have been stalled in
Helsinki for a week because
of the reluctance cf the Soviet
Union to grant them entry
The Transit Authority today
visas.
brushed aside a Motorman’s
“We are hoping the visas
Benevolent Association protest
will come through,” Mrs. Stone
that it would be “dangerous”
told her husband by phone
for‘ motormen to leave their
from Helsinki. “The most imcontrols on the EMT Myrtle,
portant part of our mission
Avenue line to help operate the
lies ahead. We hope this is
doors.
just a routine delay.”
“The MBA is making a DR. MAXIMILLIAN
FINK
The group flew from Idlemountain out of a molehill,” a
wild April 14, and stopped at
TA spokesman said.
London, Paris, Bonn and West
Theodore Loos of Jamaica,
Berlin to interview national
the association’s president, proleaders and “just plain people.”
tested yesterday that a train’s
Despite a brush-off "at 10
brakes might slip -— and the
Downing St., official residence
train start rolling—while the
of British Brime Minister Harmotorman was out of his cab.
old Macmillan, the overall re“Under our order,” the Tranaction was “favorable and opsit Authority spokesman said,
timistic,” Mrs. Stone reported.
“the motormen will have to
l.The scheduled last lap of the
leave his cab only under cerjourney was to be Russia,
tain conditions . . . and those A Long Island
psychiatrist where the group hoped to perconditions Only crop up once will
receive the first A. E. Ben- suade Kremlin officials to
in a blue moon.
Even if the motorman leaves nett Neuropsychiatric Re- agree to an unconditional ban
on nuclear testing as “a demhis controls, he’ll never be search Foundation Award.
more than four feet from the He is Dr. Ma'ximillian Fink onstration of their sincerity.”
Expenses of the trip are
brake.”
of 13- Bayview Ave., Great being borne by “Non Violent
The TA said its order applied only to a few stations on Neck, director of experimental Action Against Nuclear Weapthe Myrtle Avenue line. At psychiatry at Hillside Hospital, ons,” the same group that
sponsored the voyage of the
those stations, there’s no Glen Oaks.
“Golden Rule,” stopped
change collector at night, so Dr. Fink ‘will receive the ketch,
the conductor on the train col- award. Sunday from the Soci- by the Coast Guard off Hawaii.
lects fares. The motorman will ety of Biological Psychiatry at
be asked to help the conductor its annual convention in San
Fishermen Angry
out when a “big crowd” boards Francisco.
the train.
Over Empty Pond
He is being honored for re“We only pick up an aver- search- into the
effect of HARTFORD, Conn. (UP)—
age of four persons per trip at “shock”
Red-faced officials of the State
all those stations put together,” “we’vetherapy.
been able to discover Fish and Game Department
the TA spokesman said. “We
the mentally ill respond admitted somebody
goofed
.
.
almost never get a crowd how
to shock therapy,” Dr. Fink when angry fishermen
pomt')
\ ' there."
explained. “And, just as im- ed out in a department-proportant, we’ve learned why vided pamphlet that Day Pond
some persons do not respond in Colchester was stocked with
”at
trout and open for fishing.
to such treatments.”
j t'Dr.’ Fink has livedtin Long The anglers had risen before
I
Island since 1950, and was ap- daWn! ion:- opening day and
made thetrip to the Mind,
'
r
3

_

'

‘

'

Psychiai‘risfs

Will Honor
L. Docfor

_

_

giteconsider

'11:,

,

Q

.

.

’

.

U

�1/15/59
Department of Egperimental Psychiatry
and
the
of
presentations
a
chronologic
Following is
list
of
members
Experimental
the
of
Department
of
the
publications
Psychiatry during 1958.

M
Publications:

A.

1.

Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
of Communication, Hoch, P. and Zubin,
Ps cho atholo
3. eds., Grune E Stratton, (Kaﬁn, R.L. and Fink, M.)

2.

Lateral

3.

h.
5.
6.

Gaze Nystagmus as an Index of Sedation Threshold,

Clin. Neurophysiol. l9: 162-163 (Fink, M.).
Effect of Diethazine on EEG and Significance h for Theory
8101. 19:
of Convulsive Therapy, EEG. Clin. Neuro
207-208 (abst.) (Fink, H.5.
Experimental Studies of the E1ectroshock Process, Dis.
Nerv. Syst. l2: 113-118 (Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L.).
Comparative Study of Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma
18h6-1850
166:
J.A.M.A.
of
Psychosis,
Therapy
(Fink, M., Shaw, R., Gross, G. and Coleman, F.C.).
Eleotroencephalographic Correlates of the ElectroshockM.
227
(Abst.) (Fink,
Nerv.
Dis.
Syst.
12:
Process,
EEG.

and Green,

7.

8.

9.
10.

l1.

R.,.

Language of the Dyad, Psychiatry El: 2h9-258 (Jaffe, J.).
Clinical and EEG. Effects of Megimide in Patients without
M.
682-685
(Green,
Cerebral Disease, Neurology g:
and Pink, M.)

Effect of Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine,
&amp;

on EEG and

Psych. ﬁg: 380-388,
Behavior, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
(Fink, M.).
Experimental Studies of Convulsive and Drug Therapies on
A.M.A.
Arch.
Theoretical
Implications,
Psychiatry:
Neurol. &amp; Ps ch. 80: 733-73h (Abst.) (FinE, R., Kahn,
R.E. and Green, M77.
Brain Damage, Mental Retardation and Childhood Schizophrenia,

12.

Oculomotor and Postural Patterns in Schizophrenic Children,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Ps chiat.‘12: 720-726
(Pollack, M. and Krieger, H.P.5.

13.

A.M.A.
Arch.
of
Denial
in
Factors
Illness,
Interpersonal&amp;
Ps chiat. ﬁg: 653-656 (Jaffe, J. and
Neurol.
SiBtEj'W.H.).

�1h.

B.

Predictions of Outcome, in Youthful Offenders at
Hi hfields, Weeks, H. Ashley, e3. U. of
Michigan P ress, Ann Arbor (N. Siegel).

Presentations:
EEG Correlates of the Electroshock Process, at the
1.
Eastern Psychiatric Research Association, February,
M.
N.Y. (Fink,

3.

and Green, M.A.).

EEG
Changes
in
of
Individual Variability
Significance
During Electroshock Therapy, at Eastern Association
of Electroencephalographers, March, Montreal,
(Green, M.A.).
and
Drug Therapies
Convulsive
of
Studies
Experimental

in Psychiatry: Theoretical Implications, at
New
York Society of
and
Society
Neurological
Clinical Psychiatry, March, N.Y. (Fink, M., Kahn,
R.L. and Green, M.A.).

Abnormal
and
Normal
in
and
Attention
Visual Perception
’Children, at American Orthopsychiatric Association,
March, N.Y. (Pollack, M.).

Patterns with Altered Brain Function, at
Eastern Psychological Association, April,
and
M.).
R.L.
Fink,
Kahn,
(Jaffe,
Philadelphia
J.,
and
F
Behavioral
Physiological
Score
to
of
Relation
Response with Altered Brain Function, at Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,

Communication
The

(Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.)

7.

Intellectual Deficits in Patients with

Space Occupying

Lesions of the Cerebrum, at Eastern Psychological
Association, April, Philadelphia (Pollack, M.,
Battersby, W.S., Kahn, R.L. and Bender, M.B.).
Simultaneous
of
and
of
Perception
Stimulation
Intensity
Stimuli in Cerebral Dysfunction, at Eastern Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia (Korin, H.).

�-3-

10.

Socio-Psychological Aspects of Diagnosis and Treatment:
Theoretical Implications, Symposium - Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,
(Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Drug Induced Changes in Interview Patterns, at
Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic, and
Sociologic Aspects of the Neuroleptic (tranquilizing)
Drugs in Psychiatry, April, Montreal (Fink, M.
and

All.
12.

16.
17.

18.

19.

Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences
in Behavioral ResPonse to Convulsive Therapy, at
American Psychiatric Association, May, San
Francisco (Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical
Response to Convulsive Therapy, at Electroshock
Research Association, May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L.
and Fink, M.).
Effects of Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on EEG
and Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive
Therapy, at Society of Biological Psychiatry, May,
San Francisco (Fink, M.).
Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital, at American Psychiatric Association,
May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.)
A Critique of "Pre-Conscious" Perception and the
"Poetzl Phenomenon," at American Psychiatric
Association, May, San Francisco (Pollack, M.).
Role of EEG Frequency Shift in Behavioral Effects of
Drugs, at Section on Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. Queens.
County Medical Society, June, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post Convulsive
EEG and Behavior, American EEG Society, June,
Atlantic City (Fink, M.).
EEG and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents,
at Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psycho Pharmacologicum, September, Rome, and Eastern Association of
Electroencephalographers, December, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy, at Eastern Psychiatric Research
Association, October, N.Y. (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack,
M.).

20.

Jaffe, J.).

'

Relationship between Seizure Threshold and Duration of
Seizures to EEG Change During Electroshock, at
IEastern Association of Electroencephalographers,
December, New York (M.Green).

�uuucav twain; by»: anuunsu

.lmost as well as if he
:ould see. Here he climbs
the schdol steps with his

ypewriter to attend ‘ a
class.

\\\\\\

&amp;\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

\\\\\\\\\\\“
\\\\\\\

t
J}

\
MD Records
Brain Waves
Of Patients
,

A history written in brain

waves is telling the story
today 01' how successfully
the mentally ill are responding to electro-shock and

drug treatments.
Dr. Max. Fink, a Great
Neck psychiatrist who gave
up a proﬁtable private practice to “prospect for Iacts”,»~
has developed a method of
evaluating the brain waves
of patients at Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,_ where he’s
been leading an eight--man
research team for four
years.
The brain wave "history”,
recorded on graph paper
and transmitted by an. electroencephalogram, enables
the hospital's staff to “treat
patients with more direction” Fink says.
It works this way:
The encephalogram picks
up brain waves of a new
patient and records a “base
line” on the graph.
As the patient is treatedand repeatedly tested the
variations are recorded on
the graph. Comparisions
show whether a patient is
. or isn’t . . . responding
to a drug or shock treatment.
,

l

f

,

1

;
I
1

1

l
K

1

‘

.

-

-

3|!

1|:

1‘

“THE STUDY gives a
new and keener sense of
direction in treating the
patients,” Fink said.
For example: If a patient’s brain wave “history”
shows that his response to
is suddenly

'

'

�“1191110

Jemeqm 01 31110
Buons KlaA 8 S1,, 1112833 301s
Amman: amooaq 01 1113111
£11231

S1 911

-aonpu1

119011119110 9111

queued

.

12

s1s1sax

PWWI‘IXa 9H
'ppas 151111210st

1

'

ha]

um 112112, 51901u19110
01121190 puno; aA'eq 9AA”
3511;

'BO‘BId

mnsu! me

01111

111

11011

mm 1nd

219111

3111

lent
1elr

SSJBABJ KHJBIOG

9113,

g

3111
111911311

10 1110

[swam

K1219

1;

eu1uua1ap d19q
11mm

(111

Fsoq am

#4,!»

'.1c'[ 5111110111

Emma

9111

3,5121

sanp

seq wee],

91110:)

unease; s‘xum
ma;

1111111

19111311111

3,2111

’Ielld

sgqgepuno; [no
panoddns A11u1o§

p112

”3.190111 -‘Kq‘

s; 109(0ch 9111. was Hum
‘l‘summeu p003 KJIBA” paonp

v;

'-o.1d seq 21031on

Jeeﬁ-e-ooo‘oow

ép1s111H

112

pomém man

‘

'sKes

a:

$11.11

1101129591

9111

$1110
9111

i

“‘mou

919111“
pasn s1

as
avg
ii

13d 08

11190

AIa1'eu11x01dde”, o1 padumg

'

.seq eBe1uaJJad 3111,
1911qu 3111 mm; paseapx
aq 01 K11ua1o111ns pI—JJBAOOGJ
smemman 110qu .10 8111p

smeared 0111
10 “3,1130 13d 09 moqe” K1uo
‘1211dsoq 91.13, 12 pasn_ pue
paldope sem pomaux aAem
pa.11nb‘ax 011m

'

KING.
.‘mo
‘

”0198
“'Janeq smamman

51311113.

'JCI

sn smone

0),

az1111n

Apn1s

emem 1112.1q
PIPS RUM VICI «1-1qu

9111,,

qu

01

mammal; man

11

'UOIS

-SB.IBB.I 3111, 1199110 p118

An

A13131d

-1noa 'e 2193 52111 ‘wJo; [eu1
$1.10 511 o; xoeq ssa.1831 o1

su133q uo1z11puoo asoqm .10
‘luauxaAmduu JO nonessao
'e uaaq $911 91311), sa;eo1pu1
uo111p1100 asoqm waned V
911'),

-3AOJliﬁlt
_

Kauanbaa;

umoqs

qde
s1

3113111

mun aﬁesop
111

.10

peseaxou1 aq
—

!

B

33’

000i

u1ens pue’ ssans 10 p1.10m
9113, 01111 peseeﬁu uaqm 1121111

-soq

b1

11:10

aAeq em ssa.1

spun

1111M

-30.1d
4113;

ho

inmo- atn “‘1uaned

XOGN

e

or

01 39.1391)

1101112»

9111’ 19111

ZS

.r‘»_(’

’

�February 25, 1959.
Department of Experimental Paychiatry
Annual Report

-

1958

During 1958, the major emphasis of the

staff of the

Department of

Experimental Paychiatry shifted from evaluation of convulsive therapy to

systematic investigations of newer psychopharmacologic agents. These

investigations, derived from the successful evaluations of the

mode

of action

of convulsive therapy (l95h-l958), reserpine (1955), and chlorpromazine and

insulin

coma

(1956-1957), are based on the neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis

of physiodynamic therapies developed in the Department in 1957
ﬂggg. é? 197-206).

the

The

many new compounds

(J. Hillside

interrelationship of the neurophysiologic effects of

with the psychodynamic, perceptual, personality and

sociologic aSpects of patients' behavior provide the framework for these

investigations. In addition, linguistic indices developed in the Department
during the past two years by Drs. Kahn and Jaffe are being studied as measures

both of behavioral change and of neurophysiologic effect.
During the year, the evaluation of convulsive therapies was continued

effects of indoklon, an inhalant convulsant, with electroconvulsive therapy. 'This study was undertaken by two senior resident

by comparing the

psychiatrists,

B. Alan and H. Lefkowits, and Drs. Green and Fink.

While

indoklon therapy was a successful treatment, technicallimitations made
poor substitute for the established

electrical

methods.

The

it a

study was of

theoretic value in indicating that the significant element of convulsive
therapy was the induction of the grand mal convulsion, with

its attendant

neurophysiologic effects, independent of the type of agent employed.

�V

,

.2Investigations into the relations of sociologic factors to the

selection of therapies at Hillside Hospital were extended by Drs.

Kahn and

Pollack. Not only were the factors of age, education, birthplace, and score
on the California F Scale significantly related to the choice of therapy but
these factors were also related to the results of therapy, the diagnosis and
the duration of hOSpitalization. These observations were presented in the
Sunday Conference of October 16, 1958.
and

On

October

7

the study was repeated;

similar studies of the population of other primarily psychotherapeutic

hospitals,

and the Hillside Hospital Out-Fatient Department were undertaken.

To augment

these studies, Dr. Nathaniel Siegel was appointed as Research

Associate in Sociology, with the support of a grant from the Mental Health
Board of Nassau County.

In an extension of the communication studies, both the syntactic
content analysis and dyadic diversification measures of formal aSpects of
speech were applied to an evaluation of the changes in language patterns

following the acute administration of various new psychotropic compounds.
These measures demonstrated

and the neurophysiologic
The

consistent changes both with the induced behavioral

effects of the drugs.

acute drug interviews were but one asPect of the continuing

evaluation of the biochemistry of convulsive therapy. Previous studies had
indicated that repeated induced convulsions resulted in an increased level
of central nervous system acetylcholine activity.

€g¥:;;;;:;;;;:§
of various
anticholinergic
stages of convulsive therapy

we

compounds

By

the acute administration

to patients at various

elucidated the synaptic chemical events

which are the basis of the convulsive therapy process.

�-3In addition,

Mr. Karp and Drs. Kahn and

Pbllack continued their

perceptual studies in patients receiving psychodynamic therapies. The interrelation of psychotherapy with physiodynamic therapy was studied by Drs.
Esecover, Jaffe and Kahn; and in the
and H. Lefkowits began an

latter part

of the year, Drs. A. Kaplan

investigation into the interpersonal factors in

therapists, as well as patients, leading to the referral for physiodynannc
therapies.
During the year, Dr. H. Korin resigned, and was replaced by Mr. Eric
Karp.

TWO

new

staff

appointments include Dr. Nathaniel Siegel, Assistant

Professor of Sociology at Columbia University, as Research Associate in
Sociology; and Dr. Donald Klein, research

candidate at the

New

York Psychoanalytic

scientist at
Institute, as

Creedmoor

Institute

Research Associate in

Psychiatry.
Support for this extensive program was provided by the Board of

Directors, and continuing grants of the Foundations'

Fund

for Research in

Psychiatry and the National Institute of Mental Health. At year end, this
program received considerable Support from the Psychopharmacology Service
Center of the National

Institute of

Mental Health, which augmented

extensive commitment by a grant of $268,000. These

its

already

further

sums were

increased during the year by support from the Mental Health Board of Nassau
County which provided funds

Smith, Kline

&amp;

for sociologic studies;

and from

Bristol, Geigy,

French, and wyeth Laboratories ~ who aided the drug evaluation

program by grants as well as extensive supplies of the agents

During the year, fourteen reports of the work of

staff

to

be

studied.

members

appeared; and twenty reports were presented to major professional societies.

�-hIn addition to national societies, work of the Department was presented at
the Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic and Sociologic Aspects of
Neuroleptic Drugs in Montreal, and the International Congress of Neuropsychopharmcology in Rome.

Staff

first

members were awarded two

prizes. Dr.

M.

Fink received the

annual A.E. Bennett Peychiatric Essearch Award of the Society of Biologic

Psychiatry for his report on the effects of anticholinergic agents on

EEG

and

behavior. Dr. J. Jaffe received the Gralnick Foundation annual award for his

report

on the

application of analysis of changes in fonnal aSpects of Speech

in psychotherapy.

�-5The

staff

of the Department of Experimental Psychiatry included,

at

year end:
MEX

Fink, M.D.

Direeees

Joseph Jeffe, M.D.

Research Associate (Peychiatry)

Donald F. Klein,

Research Associate (Peychiatry)

MQD.

Robert L. Kahn, Fh.D.
Max

Pollack,

Pth.

Research Associate
(Experimental Psychology)
Research Associate
(Experimental Paychology)

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.

Research Associate (Sociology)

Eric Karp, B.A.

Research Assistant
(Experimental Peychology)

Martin A. Green, M.D.

Associate in Research

Abraham A. Kaplan, M.D.

Associate in Research (Paychiatry)

Barre Alan, M.D.

Fellow (1957-58)

Henry Lefkewits, M.D.

Fellow (1958-59)

The

(Neurophysiology)

technical staff included Mrs. Janet Bowie, Jean Kolodny,

Mbsquera and Blanche

Hannah

Zaitz.

addendum: In February Dr. George Krauthamer, Ph.D. was appointed

as Research Assistant (Experimental Psychology).

electroencephalography.

He

is a trainee in

�nan-{u

£55,

1959.

lupurtuoat at ngcriunutal rayshxttvr
‘lunaal Icpcrt

~ 1955

ﬁtting 1953, it: 3.3.9 atyhnstg I! it. i‘l!‘ at tho
ﬁapartunat it xxptriuaninl firth$¢%ry Ihlf‘ll tron utilisatog
at convulsivt thurupr to tru‘unsttc tavnu‘acatinua a: utuar
paynhnpitamnnoiauin attain. tunic tsvultxgntaill. inrtth
Iron in. littl8if§1 evaluaiiOII or ﬁt. and: of 30‘s.: it
nonralltvv thirty: (19$h~1956). IlllrpllO (1958). in: ohlcrv
prunastnn uni 13.31%: can. (1!5‘~1!S?). are biaad on th.
ultrtplftiﬂltilinlltpit?! lyptihovti at piyctudynugac shoIUplon
ilviaupul in it. ﬁdpnriutnt in 1’37 (3. lilgggdﬁ aggg.‘gi
191~!06).

{it zutirrtxitiluuhiv a:

it. noarophyltqlocso

uttccts at st; unnr'nou taupe-nan with ﬁt. ysywhodraunic.
pavuuyttnl. parlouulttr can 100301.110 Itpoc£a a: paﬁtunts’
ﬁchavtor pruvt‘o it. tranauurk (or that. tatto$1gtttona. In
I‘¢1$&amp;Qn. linguistic indict: Ctvtltptd In it. burnrtanat
during tho y‘at iii 3“?! h: ﬁra. its: an: anxta £33 icing
aﬁnlacd a: ltnntrns butt-o: snttvaornl gluugc and a: unuroatylaslal11_c££¢st§

Birlll

‘

30:», ‘hn nviltnssal ¢r cunvllutv. ihariaaao
It! «outlnnwd hr aiuparins tic ntIUuic a! xndokxou, ll intalint
Giuvnlnult. wait cioctitcinv‘lctvu ‘hirlpr. this Itu¢r'uua
Iatcrﬁnhtu i7 is. nonior routdnnt purittotrtgtc, I. 51:. an:
£33

I. Latiusita, int Ira. aroma and itat. “talc indctlnl thirty:
was a lltﬁillf‘l $roo$nnnt, tachataal ltnitutttna nut: tt 1

�up"

you

mama

{or

it. «mam alum“: with“. m
an
m» «mum “at a. “pianist

W:

It“: a
can» a: emu” “my in; a» mum or 1-» [mu
m mum. with in “Mt magnum: «In»,
a: u. tn» :1 “on min“.
«It
Mntmuuu at. a. mm. mans. rum:
to m «luau of “mm ct 3111“.“ “mm M:
an.»
hr
only
an
as
in
tum:
mm.
an
m
“W
or m. mum. sauna». and arm a m editors“
I Seal. “sauna!” villi“ to m ¢um .1 till”, b“
in" “can an an ”um u m m1” at
m «and: all m man at mustang... m»
was

Wt

’

W.

an 3mm
“was”1993.
and
7m
«mum
Mmmm;
mu,
any.» M1» at th- mum of «In» my pm!»
an
Mann.
mhnttut
mud:
ms»).
a.
wanan «arm. 9'. mt mu umm. am
an
an“:
lama
m
“man
a
am:
mm
a: 1 mt m ﬂu man:
analogy, with ﬂit
W
In!“ m .0: lam cm.
In a
a:
no
gun...
m
m
smut“
'2th
«nun»
in u:-

may Gal-(mu u

Wt

u-mu m in!“ “main“ mm:
at! (cm mat. a: ”all
0:
«911“
mutant:
u
an
a
”than «nun; m min mun»
tn Mn in
$11: 0! arm: nu ”mama
Mo
mmWu.
mnnua «Intuit «as» an an m an.“ mmra
mucus

m

�~30

Ind 58. attriptsiluiogln drrlnta a! ‘50 (tutu.
tho :tuto iris II‘.IVIGII airs Uni an: tivit§

ﬁnutaluinr uralnattan

ncmy.

a:

.3

it.

it. hinalnuttﬁry'at unwrilntvl

‘

mm- mm m mun-d mm mm

sudteod convalntuns runnittd in an incrtngod lattl or ¢¢ntral
larvana tyn‘tn asnirlthalnao activity. 31 $5. taut. ninth.

iytruttnu o: tartan: £urttumyunnano Il‘tttlﬂlliriii uuupguuda
i0 paticn$l at vtrinmc ittttl n: unnvulcirc thoraar u.

datum m mun:

W

«nu mu m m

of it. ssnvulltvc thnvnpy'yrnetut.
In tﬂlttiin, It. 1:13 Ind 3:1. (It: and fuzinnk
couiiaxnd $8.1! ycrtnptunl ctuiicn a: puatlutt rccctvinc
payuhcdynnato iharuptuo. its {starrolutt-I at ptfiha$harapr
tit! piwiiod’nauit ‘harulr III utudiad k7 bra. lltcuvur,

Silt.

In“. an an; ad in m m... u» or u. m, an.
lupin; Iii I. Latioulis began an invua‘lat‘tan tut. iii

1.

iv Ir. Ira. tarp. it. saw tint: appalltntata tlilﬁdﬂ Dr.
lithnnatl $13.1, ttoisttnt frotoccor c: sacialtur l‘ Guarani.

Unawaraity,

at Itnnutah ltuuctntc in

IOISOIII13 Ind Br.

Basalt Izctn, rootarct auiuuttit n! erauilsor Inniiﬁutc and
canlslato at $8: low lurk rqrcho:xllyﬁie Inltttlto. at

am! and“. a puma-y.

�4,.

mt
t
m
ﬂu
an
I!
autism:
fmﬂ‘mv
3mm,
all“
m
tu-

.1,

nu main

m 9min“ is

Inn-“ah
vacuum
m
"an":
at
a
m
mm
at
m
tu-

mm mu. an» m. an 9mm unit“ «a»
tun m Myth-awn.” 8min
«mm.
mm of a. bum tutu“. .2 mm m1», nut

W

«mm
“68mm.

its alum

M

om“

annual-nit 37

MM!
in”
m

a»

grant a:

m
mm m; m

wnwmummm mama-Inn‘smu

um mm: M. in mama Isms»; M 3m
tram, «m. mu, na- Mat. ml in“ 3.5mm”.
-m
a. nu walnut. "an: by an” a an u
«may. mm» at the am“ a In this“.
tho
may my", tum mu 0! a. an! a «at:
and
mun mama; m» mm: an yum-mm to “an
”wanna mun». In man u mum: sauna,
uni at a»
m mum“ at m man»: u
1:

m

mu
”whirls-u, "73W“

1min)“: ml
It

in

mm,
1:

and

autumn zap-uh

and tho

IanWlm
am: mun at" M

am.

or

Int-mum cum”

“It print. 3:.

R.

ﬂak

man“ m am mu). 1.». am“ human; Swami
am it it. “all“: st um“ “mum at Ma up»!
0!
an
m
an.»
u
m
w Witt.
mu
datum.
‘

�.s.
tantalum
mu! m
in
a. um mind emu
at
at
I» in mat a a. manual ”an“ than
in am mu“ .2 moth 1: ,WW.

J.

�«64-

150 3%.::

at tic ntynrtlcut if lupcrtncn.t§ rtythittry

Intliiad. at 33.! out:
an: vagu.

Bitiytar
ln-taruh tsuoctuit (ragthtttrr)

I.3.

Jenny! Jatfb. lb!»

mm:

‘1".

lthort

L.

III:

mm,

mm.

Illa. Pl.ﬁ.

"Mk'

Inn.

llﬂlﬂllnl itigul. thaa.
Wm..—

m. M,
‘O
”#3;
mm 0m.
30‘.

.

3",;
3"“;
AW
3.;

It!!! ”all, I’D;
lint: Luthuui‘s, lpﬂ.

ltﬂiﬁrti Aasuoiuﬁn (firthtttry)
Iliilfﬂh Atlliilii_
(lupotinuuttl rtvuhaztux)

Intonrnh snln¢tutn
(invtrilnttll P-vthnlacy)
inaalvuh Asaaitnﬁc (80:103.:71
Icaiirdh Aaltcﬁaut
.(lagnrlnnntul rurnlnlocy)
£::o¢tnto in nasatvcl
(lvuruphyntilugy)
guspntsia in Ittoarol (rsywhaatry)

villuu (19£?~$ﬁ)
Ibllov (1955-59)
‘15::
Juan
Janet
tuulllod
urn.
tastu1¢i1
loioinr,
Inuit.
It.
luntni aboqutti an: lxanaht 3a1$n.

�1/15/59
Department of Experimental Psychiatrz

list

and
the
of
presentations
a
chronologic
Following is
of
Experimental
members
of
the
Department
of
the
publications

Psychiatry during 1958.
A.“ Publications:
1.
Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
of Communication, Hoch, P. and Zubin,
Ps cho atholo
3. e38., Urune E Stratton, (Kaﬁn, R.L. and Pink, M.)
of Sedation Threshold,
2.
Lateral Gaze Nystagmus as an Index162-163
(Fink, M.).
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. lg:
EEG
and Significance for Theory
on
of
Diethazine
3.
Effect
of Convulsive Therapy, EEG. Clin. Neurophzsiol. l9:
207‘208 (abate) (Fink,
Process, his.
h.
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock
M.
and
Kahn,
R.L.).
113-118
(Fink,
Nerv.
l2:
Coma
and
Insulin
of
Chlorpromazine
5.
Comparative Study
18h6-1850
166:
J.A.M.A.
of
Psychosis,
Therapy
G.
and
Coleman, F.C.).
Shaw,
Gross,
M.,
R.,
(Fink,
6.
Electroencephalographic Correlates of the ElectroshockM.
S
Nerv.
Dis.
st. $2: 227 (Abst.) (Fink,
Process,
o

o

stt.

and Green, H.$.

7.
8.

9.
10.

(Jaffe, J.).
Pszchiatrz 3;:
Effects of Megimide in Patients without
M.

Language of the Dyed,

Clinical and

EEG.

2h9-258

Cerebral Disease, Neurologz Q: 682-685 (Green,
and Fink, M.)
EEG
and
on
Diethazine,
Agent,
of
Anticholinergic
Effect
&amp; Pszch. ﬁg: 380-388,
Arch.
Neurol.
L.M.A.
Behavior,
(Fink, M.).
on
and
Drug
Therapies
Convulsive
of
Studies
Experimental
Arch.
A.M.A.
Theoretical
Implications,
Psychiatry:
Neurol. &amp; Ps ch. 80: 733-73h (Abst.) (FInE, 3.. Kahn,

F.I.

and Green, M77.

ll.

Brain Damage, Mental Retardation and Childhood Schizophrenia,
Am. J. Pszchiat. 115: h22-h28 (Pollack, M.).

12.

Oculomotor and Postural Patterns in Schizophrenic Children,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Ps chiat..12: 720-726
(Pollack, M. and Krieger, H.P.5.

13.

Arch.
A.M.A.
of
Denial
in
Factors
Illness,
Interpersonal&amp;
Ps chiat. ﬁg; 653-656 (Jaffe, . and
Neurol.

Slate,

W.H.$.

�1’40

B.

Predictions of Outcome, in Youthful Offenders at
Hi hfields, Weeks, H. Ashley, e3. U. of
Michigan P ress, Ann Arbor (N. Siegel .

Presentations:
1. EEG Correlates of the Electroshock Process, at the
Eastern Psychiatric Research Association, February,
N.Y. (Fink,

M.

and Green, M.A.).

2.

EEG
Changes
in
of
Individual Variability
Significance
During Electroshock Therapy, at Eastern Association
of Electroencephalographers, March, Montreal,
(Green, M.A.).

3.

and
Drug Therapies
Convulsive
of
Studies
Experimental
in Psychiatry: Theoretical Implications, at
New
York Society of
and
Society
Neurological
Clinical Psychiatry, March, N.Y. (Fink, M., Kahn,

R.L. and Green, M.A.).

Abnormal
and
Normal
and
in
Attention
Visual Perception
Children, at American Orthopsychiatric Association,
March, N.Y. (Pollack, M.).

Patterns with Altered Brain Function, at
Eastern Psychological Association, April,
and
M.).
R.L.
Fink,
Kahn,
Philadelphia (Jaffe, J.,
Relation of F Score to Behavioral and Physiological
Response with Altered Brain Function, at Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,

Communication

6.

The

(Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.)

7.

Intellectual Deficits in Patients with Space Occupying
Lesions of the Cerebrum, at Eastern Psychological

Association, April, Philadelphia (Pollack, M.,
Battersby, W.S., Kahn, R.L. and Bender, M.B.).
Simultaneous
of
and
Stimulation
Perception
of
Intensity
Stimuli in Cerebral Dysfunction, at Eastern Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia (Korin, H.).

�-3-

10;

Socio-Psychological Aspects of Diagnosis and Treatment:
Theoretical Implications, Symposium - Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,
(Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Drug Induced Changes in Interview Patterns, at
Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic, and
Sociologic ASpects of the Neuroleptic (tranquilizing)
M.
Montreal
(Fink,
Drugs in Psychiatry, April,
and

11.

12.

13.

16.
17.
18.

19.

Jaffe, J.).

Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences
in Behavioral Reaponse to Convulsive Therapy, at
American Psychiatric Association, May, San
Francisco (Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical
Response to Convulsive Therapy, at Electroshock
Research Association, May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L.
and Fink, M.).
EEG
on
Diethazine,
of
Agent,
Anticholinergic
Effects
and Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive
Therapy, at Society of Biological Psychiatry, May,
San Francisco (Fink, M.).
Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital, at American Psychiatric Association,
May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.)
A Critique of "Pre-Conscious" Perception and the
"Poetzl Phenomenon," at American Psychiatric
Association, May, San Francisco (Pollack, M.).
Role of EEG Frequency Shift in Behavioral Effects of
&amp;
Neurol.
on
Section
Psychiat. Queens
Drugs, at
County Medical Society, June, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
on Post Convulsive
Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds
EEG and Behavior, American EEG Society, June,
Atlantic City (Fink, M.).
EEG and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents,
at Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psycho Pharmacologicum, September, Rome, and Eastern Association of
Electroencephalographers, December, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy, at Eastern Psychiatric Research
Association, October, N.Y. (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack,
M.).

20.

Relationship between Seizure Threshold and Duration of
Seizures to EEG Change During Electroshock, at
Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers,
December, New York (M.Green).

�law
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Glen Oaks,

New

York

March 16, 1959

MEMO TO RESEARCH

FROM:

RE:

'

COWITI'EE

JOSEPH S.A. MILLER, M.D., MEDICAL DIRECTOR
ATTACHED RESEARCH REPORT

I

herewith enclosing copy of Dr.
sending it a few days in advance of the meeting,
familiarize yourself with some of the main facts
position to discuss this when it is presented at
meeting on March 25th.
am

Fink's report,

so that you might
and be in a better

the forthcoming

�FebmaIy 25, 19590
Department of Experimental Peychiatry
Annual Report

-

1958

During 1958, the major emphasis of the

staff of the

Department of

Experimental Paychiatry shifted from evaluation of convulsive therapy to

systematic investigations of newer psychopharmacologic agents. These

investigations, derived from the successful evaluations of the

mode

of action

of convulsive therapy (l9Sh-l958), reserpine (1955), and chlorpromazine and

insulin

coma

(1956-1957), are based on the neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesis

of physiodynamic therapies developed in the Department in 1957
Eggg.

the

ﬁg

197-206).

The

many new compounds

(J. Hillside

interrelationship of the neurophysiologic effects of

with the psychodynamic, perceptual, personality and

sociologic aspects of patients' behavior provide the framework for these

investigations. In addition, linguistic indices developed in the Department
during the past two years by Drs. Kahn and Jaffe are being studied as measures
both of behavioral change and of neurophysiologic effect.
During the year, the evaluation of convulsive therapies was continued
by comparing the

effects of indoklon, an inhalant convulsant, with electro-

convulsive therapy. This study was undertaken by two senior resident

psychiatrists,

B. Alan and H. Lefkowits, and Dre. Green and Fink.

'While

indoklon therapy was a successful treatment, technicallimitations made

it a

poor substitute for the established

electrical methods. The study was of
theoretic value in indicating that the significant element of convulsive

therapy was the induction of the grand mal convulsion, with

its attendant

neurophysiologic effects, independent of the type of agent employed.

�.2the
to
factors
of
the
sociologic
relations
into
Investigations
Kahn
and
Drs.
extended
by
were
Hillside
Hospital
of
at
selection
therapies

Pollack. Not only were the factors of age, education, birthplace, and score
on the California F Scale significantly related to the choice of therapy but
and
the
of
diagnosis
the
to
results
therapy,
related
also
these factors were
the duration of heapitalization. These observations were presented in the
Sunday Conference of October 16, 1958.
and

On

October

7

the study was repeated;

similar studies of the population of other primarily psychotherapeutic

undertaken.
were
Out-Patient
Department
and
HOSpital
Hillside
the
hoSpitals,
To augment

these studies, Dr. Nathaniel Siegel was appointed as Research

Associate in Sociology, with the support of a grant from the mental Health
Board of Nassau County.

In an extension of the communication studies, both the syntactic
content analysis and dyadic diversification measures of formal aspects of
epeech were applied to an evaluation of the changes in language patterns

following the acute administration of various new psychotropic compounds.
These measures demonstrated consistent changes both with the induced behavioral
and the neurophysiologic
The

effects of the drugs.

acute drug interviews were but one aspect of the continuing

evaluation of the biochemistry of convulsive therapy. Previous studies had
indicated that repeated induced convulsions resulted in an increased level
of central nervous system acetylcholine activity. By the acute administration
of various tertiary-amine anticholinergic compounds to patients at various

stages of convulsive therapy

we

elucidated the synaptic chemical events

which are the basis of the convulsive therapy process.

�-3In addition, Mr. Karp and Drs.

Kahn and

Pbllack continued their

perceptual studies in patients receiving psychodynamic therapies.

inter-

The

relation of psychotherapy with physiodynamic therapy was studied by Drs.
Esecover, Jaffe and Kahn; and in the latter part of the year, Drs. A. Kaplan
and H. Lefkowits began an

investigation into the interpersonal factors in

therapists, as well as patients, leading to the referral for physicdynamic
therapies.
During the year, Dr. H. Korin resigned, and was replaced by Mr. Eric
Karp.

TWO

new

staff

appointments include Dr. Nathaniel Siegel, Assistant

Professor of Sociology at Columbia University, as Research Associate in
Sociology; and Dr. Donald Klein, research

candidate

at the

New

York Psychoanalytic

scientist at
Institute, as

Creedmoor

Institute

Research Associate in

Psychiatry.
Support for this extensive program was provided by the Board of

Directors, and continuing grants of the Foundations'

Fund

for

Research in

Psychiatry and the National Institute of Mental Health. At year end, this
program received considerable support from the Psychopharmacclogy Service
Center of the National

Institute of

Mental Health, which augmented

extensive commitment by a grant of $268,000. These

its

already

further

sums were

increased during the year by support from the Mental Health Board of Nassau
County which provided funds

Smith, Kline

&amp;

for sociologic studies;

French, and wyeth Laboratories

- who

and from

Bristol, Geigy,

aided the drug evaluation

program by grants as well as extensive supplies of the agents

During the year, fourteen reports of the work of

staff

to

be

studied.

members

appeared; and twenty reports were presented to major professional societies.

�.1...

In addition to national societies, work of the Department was presented at
the Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic and Sociologic Aspects of

Neuroleptic Drugs in Montreal, and the International Congress of Neuropsyohophamacology in Rome.

Staff

first

members were awarded two

prizes. Dr.

M.

Fink received the

annual A.E. Bennett Paychiatzic Research Award of the Society of Biologic

Psychiatry for his report

on the

effects of anticholinergic agents

on Em and

behavior. Dr. J. Jaffe received the Gralnick Foundation annual award for his

report

on the

application of analysis of changes in formal aspects of Speech

in psychotherapy.

�-5The

staff

of the Department of Experimental Psychiatry included,

year end:
Max

Fink, M.D.

M

Joseph Jaffe, MlD.

Research Associate (Peychiatry)

Donald F. Klein,

Research Associate (Psychiatry)

MgD.

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.

Research Associate
(Experimental Peychology)

Pollack, Ph.D.

Research Associate
(Experimental Psychology)

Max

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.

Research Associate (Sociology)

Eric Karp, B.A.

Research Assistant
(Experimental Psychology)

Martin A. Green, M.D.

Associate in Research

Abraham.A. Kaplan, M.D.

Associate in Research (Paychiatry)

Barre Alan, M.D.

Fellow (1957-58)

Henry Lefkowits, M.D.

Fellow (1958-59)

The

(Neurophysiology)

technical staff included Mrs. Janet Bowie, Jean Kolodny,

Mosquera and Blanche
Addendum:

Hannah

Zaitz.

In February Dr. George Krauthamer, Ph.D. was appointed

as Research Assistant (Experimental Psychology).

electroencephalography.

at

He

is a trainee in

�1/15/59
Department of Experimental Psychiatry
and
the
of
presentations
a
chronologic list
Following is
of
members
Experimental
the
of
Department
of
the
publications
Psychiatry during 1958.

Publications:

A.

1.

Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
of Communication, Hoch, P. and Zubin,
Ps chopatholo
3. eds., Grune &amp; Stratton, (Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.)

2.

Lateral

3.

h.
5.
6.

Gaze Nystagmus as an Index of Sedation Threshold,

Clin. Neurophysiol. 19: 162-163 (Fink, M.).
EEG
and Significance for Theory
on
of
Diethazine
Effect
of Convulsive Therapy, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19:
EEG.

Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process, Dis.
M.
and Kahn, R.L.).
113-118
(Fink,
Nerv. Syst. 12:
Coma
and
Insulin
of
Chlorpromazine
Study
Comparative
Therapy of Psychosis, J.A.M.A. 166: 18h6-1850
G.
and
Coleman, F.C.).
Shaw,
Gross,
R.,
(Fink, M.,
Electroencephalographic Correlates of the ElectroshockM.
Process, Dis. Nerv. Syst. 12: 227 (Abst.) (Fink,
and GreenTWMTfT—___-—*—

(Jaffe, J.).

7.

Language of the Dyad, Psychiatry 31: 2h9-258

8.

without
Patients
in
of
Megimide
Effects
Clinical
M.
682-685
(Green,
Q:
Cerebral Disease, Neurology
and EEG.

and Fink, M.)

9.
10.

on EEG and

Effect of Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine,
&amp; Psych. g9: 380-388,
Neurol.
A.M.A.
Arch.
Behavior,
(Fink, M.).
on
and
Drug
Therapies
Convulsive
of
Studies
Experimental
A.M.A.
Arch.
Theoretical
Implications,
Psychiatry:
Kahn,
M.,
&amp;
(FinE,
80:
733-73h
(Abst.)
Neurol.
Psych.
R.E. and Green, M77.

11.

Brain Damage, Mental Retardation and Childhood Schizophrenia,
Am. J. Psychiat. 115: h22-h28 (Pollack, M.).

12.

Oculomotor and Postural Patterns in Schizophrenic Children,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Ps chiat. 12: 720-726
(Pollack, M. and Krieger, H.P.5.

13.

A.M.A.
Arch.
of
Denial
in
Factors
Illness,
Interpersonal&amp;
and
653-656
J.
Ps
(Jaffe,
ﬁg:
Neurol.
chiat.
Slote, W.H.§.

�1h.

B.

Predictions of Outcome, in Youthful Offenders at
H. Ashley, ed. 5. of
Highfields, Weeks,
Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (N. Siegel).

Presentations:
the
EEG
at
Electroshock
of
the
Process,
Correlates
l.
Eastern Psychiatric Research Association, February,
M.
N.Y. (Fink,

and Green, M.A.).

EEG
Changes
in
of
Individual
Variability
Significance
During Electroshock Therapy, at Eastern Association
of Electroencephalographers, March, Montreal,
(Green, M.A.).

Experimental Studies of Convulsive and Drug Therapies
in Psychiatry: Theoretical Implications, at
New
York Society of
and
Society
Neurological
Clinical Psychiatry, March, N.Y. (Fink, M., Kahn,
R.L. and Green, M.A.).
Visual Perception and Attention in Normal and Abnormal
Children, at American Orthopsychiatric Association,
March, N.Y. (Pollack, M.).
Communication Patterns with Altered Brain Function, at
Eastern Psychological Association, April,
and
M.).
R.L.
Fink,
Kahn,
(Jaffe,
Philadelphia
J.,

Relation of F Score to Behavioral and Physiological
Response with Altered Brain Function, at Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,
(Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.)
Intellectual Deficits in Patients with Space Occupying
Lesions of the Cerebrum, at Eastern Psychological
Association, April, Philadelphia (Pollack, M.,
Battersby, W.S., Kahn, R.L. and Bender, M.B.).
Simultaneous
of
and
of
Stimulation
Perception
Intensity
Stimuli in Cerebral Dysfunction, at Eastern Psychol~
ogical Association, April, Philadelphia (Korin, H.).

The

�-3-

10.

Socio-Psychological Aspects of Diagnosis and Treatment:
Theoretical Implications, Symposium - Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,
(Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Drug Induced Changes in Interview Patterns, at
Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic, and
Sociologic Aspects of the Neuroleptic (tranquilizing)
M.
Montreal
(Fink,
Drugs in Psychiatry, April,
_

and

11.

12.

13.

16.
17.
18.

19.

Jaffe, J.).

Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences
in Behavioral Response to Convulsive Therapy, at
American Psychiatric Association, May, San
Francisco (Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical
Response to Convulsive Therapy, at Electroshock
Research Association, May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L.
and Fink, M.).
EEG
on
of
Agent,
Diethazine,
Effects
Anticholinergic
and Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive
Therapy, at Society of Biological Psychiatry, May,
San Francisco (Fink, M.).
Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital, at American Psychiatric Association,
May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.)
A Critique of "Pre-Conscious" Perception and the
"Poetzl Phenomenon," at American Psychiatric
Association, May, San Francisco (Pollack, M.).
Role of EEG Frequency Shift in Behavioral Effects of
&amp;
Neurol.
on
Section
Psychiat. Queens
Drugs, at
County Medical Society, June, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
on Post Convulsive
Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds
EEG and Behavior, American EEG Society, June,
Atlantic City (Fink, M.).
EEG and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents,
at Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psycho Pharmacologicum, September, Rome, and Eastern Association of
Electroencephalographers, December, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy, at Eastern Psychiatric Research
Association, October, N.Y. (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack,
M.).

20.

Relationship between Seizure Threshold and Duration of
Seizures to EEG Change During Electroshock, at
Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers,
December,

New

York (M.Green).

�1/15/59
Department of Experimental Psychiatry
and
the
of
presentations
Following is a chronologic list
of
Experimental
the
members
Department
of
the
of
publications
Psychiatry during 1958.
A.

Publications:
in
Therapy,
Electroshock
During
Language
Changes in
1.
and
Zubin,
P.
Hoch,
Communication,
of
cho
Ps
atholo
3. eds., Grune &amp; Stratton, (Kaﬁn, R.L. and Fink, M.)
of Sedation Threshold,
2.
Lateral Gaze Nystagmus as an Index162-163
(Fink, M.).
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19:
EEG
and Significance for Theory
on
of
Diethazine
3.
Effect
of Convulsive Therapy, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19:
h.
5.
6.
7.

8.
9.
10.

11.
12.

13.

Process, Dis.
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock
M.
and Kahn, R.L.).
113-118
(Fink,
Nerv. Syst. 12:
Coma
and
Insulin
Comparative Study of Chlorpromazine
18h6-1850
166:
J.A.M.A.
of
Psychosis,
Therapy
and
G.
Coleman, F.C.).
Shaw,
Gross,
R.,
(Fink, M.,
Electroencephalographic Correlates of the ElectroshockM.
227
(Fink,
(Abst.)
Nerv.
Dis.
Syst.
12:
Process,
and Green, M.,.
2h9~258
21:
(Jaffe, J.).
the
Dyad, Psychiatry
Language of
without
in
Patients
of
EEG.
Megimide
and
Effects
Clinical
M.
682-685
(Green,
Cerebral Disease, Neurology g:
and Fink, M.)
EEG
and
on
Diethazine,
Agent,
Effect of Anticholinergic
&amp; Psych. ﬁg: 380-388,
Neurol.
Arch.
A.M.A.
Behavior,
(Fink, M.).
on
and
Drug
Therapies
Convulsive
of
Studies
Experimental
Arch.
A.M.A.
Implications,
Theoretical
Psychiatry:
(FEEET'MTT’Kahn,
733—73h
&amp;
80:
(Abst.)
Ps
ch.
Neurol.
ﬁ.f. and Green, M77.
Brain Damage, Mental Retardation and Childhood Schizophrenia,
Am. J. Psychiat. 115: h22—h28 (Pollack, M.).

W..—

Oculomotor and Postural Patterns in Schizophrenic Children,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Ps chiat..12: 720-726
,fPollack, M. and Krieger, H.P.5.
Arch.
A.M.A.
of
Denial
in
Illness,
Interpersonal&amp; Factors
Ps chiat. ﬁg: 653-656 (Jaffe, J. and
Neurol.
Slote, W.H.$.

�1h.

B.

Predictions of Outcome, in Youthful Offenders at
Hi hfields, Weeks, H. Ashley, ed. U. of
Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (N. Siegel).

Presentations:
EEG Correlates of the Electroshock Process, at the
1.
Eastern Psychiatric Research Association, February,
M.
N.Y. (Fink,

and Green, M.A.).

EEG
Changes
in
of
Individual Variability
Significance
During Electroshock Therapy, at Eastern Association
of Electroencephalographers, March, Montreal,
(Green, M.A.).

and
Drug Therapies
of
Convulsive
Studies
Experimental
in Psychiatry: Theoretical Implications, at
New
York Society of
and
Society
Neurological
Clinical Psychiatry, March, N.Y. (Fink, M., Kahn,

R.L. and Green, M.A.).

Abnormal
and
Normal
and
in
Attention
Visual Perception
Children, at American Orthopsychiatric Association,
March, N.Y. (Pollack, M.).

Patterns with Altered Brain Function, at
Eastern Psychological Association, April,
and
M.).
R.L.
Fink,
Kahn,
(Jaffe,
Philadelphia
J.,
Relation of F Score to Behavioral and Physiological
Response with Altered Brain Function, at Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,

Communication
The

(Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.)

Intellectual Deficits in Patients with

Space Occupying

Lesions of the Cerebrum, at Eastern Psychological
Association, April, Philadelphia (Pollack, M.,
Battersby, W.S., Kahn, R.L. and Bender, M.B.).
Simultaneous
of
and
of
Stimulation
Perception
Intensity
Stimuli in Cerebral Dysfunction, at Eastern Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia (Korin, H.).

�-3Socio—Psychological ASpects of Diagnosis and Treatment:

10.

Drug

Theoretical Implications, Symposium - Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,
(Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Induced Changes in Interview Patterns, at
Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic, and
Sociologic ASpects of the Neuroleptic (tranquilizing)
M.
Montreal
(Fink,
Drugs in Psychiatry, April,
‘

and

11.

12.

16.
17.
18.

19.

Jaffe, J.).

Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences
in Behavioral Reaponse to Convulsive Therapy, at
American Psychiatric Association, May, San
Francisco (Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical
Response to Convulsive Therapy, at Electroshock
Research Association, May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L.
and Fink, M.).
EEG
on
of
Agent,
Diethazine,
Effects
Anticholinergic
and Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive
Therapy, at Society of Biological Psychiatry, May,
San Francisco (Fink, M.).
Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital, at American Psychiatric Association,
May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.)
A Critique of "Pre-Conscious" Perception and the
"Poetzl Phenomenon," at American Psychiatric
Association, May, San Francisco (Pollack, M.).
Role of EEG Frequency Shift in Behavioral Effects of
&amp;
Neurol.
on
Section
Psychiat. Queens
Drugs, at
County Medical Society, June, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post Convulsive
EEG and Behavior, American EEG Society, June,
Atlantic City (Fink, M.).
EEG and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents,
at Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psycho Pharmacologicum, September, Rome, and Eastern Association of
Electroencephalographers, December, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy, at Eastern Psychiatric Research
Association, October, N.Y. (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack,
M.).

20.

Relationship between Seizure Threshold and Duration of
Seizures to ERG Change During Electroshock, at
Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers,
December, New York (M.Green).

�1/15/59
Department of Experimental Psychiatry
and
the
of
presentations
Following is a chronologic list
of
EXperimental
members
the
of
Department
of
the
publications
Psychiatry during 1958.

Publications:

A.

1.

Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
of Communication, Hoch, P. and Zubin,
Ps cho atholo
M.)
and
E
R.L.
(Kahn,
Fink,
Grune
Stratton,
J. eds.,

2.

Gaze Nystagmus as an Index of Sedation Threshold,

3.

h.
5.
6.
7.

8.
9.
10.

11.
12.
13.

Lateral

M.).
162-163
(Fink,
Clin. Neurophysiol. 19:
EEG
Theory
for
and
on
Significance
of
Diethazine
Effect
of Convulsive Therapy, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. lg:
EEG.

Process, Dis.
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock
Nerv. Syst. 12: 113-118 (Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L.).
Coma
and
Insulin
of
Chlorpromazine
Comparative Study
18b6-1850
166:
J.A.M.A.
of
Psychosis,
Therapy
and
G.
Coleman, F.C.).
Shaw,
R., Gross,
(Fink, M.,
Electroencephalographic Correlates of the ElectroshockM.
227
(Fink,
(Abst.)
Nerv.
Dis.
Syst.
12:
Process,
and Green, ﬁ.$.
2h9-258
(Jaffe, J.).
the
of
g1:
Dyed,
Psychiatry
Language
without
in
Patients
EEG.
Megimide
of
and
Effects
Clinical
M.
682~685
(Green,
Cerebral Disease, Neurology g:
and Fink, M.)
EEG
and
on
Diethazine,
Effect of Anticholinergic Agent, &amp;
380-388,
Q9:
Neurol.
Arch.
A.M.A.
Psych.
Behavior,
(Fink, M.).
on
and
Drug
Therapies
Convulsive
of
Studies
Experimental
Arch.
A.M.A.
Implications,
Theoretical
Psychiatry:
Kahn,
(Fink,
&amp;
ﬁ.,
80:
733-73h
(Abst.)
Ps
ch.
Neurol.
R.I. and Green, M77.
Childhood
and
Schizophrenia,
Mental
Retardation
Damage,
Brain
Am. J. Psychiat. 115: h22-h28 (Pollack, M.).
Oculomotor and Postural Patterns in Schizophrenic Children,
&amp;
Ps chiat._12: 720-726
Neurol.
Arch.
A.M.A.
(Pollack, M. and Krieger, H.P.5.
Arch.
A.M.A.
of
Denial
in
Illness,
Factors
Interpersonal&amp;
and
653-656
J.
Ps
(Jaffe,
chiat.
g9:
Neurol.
Slote, W.H.$.

�1h.

B.

at
Predictions of Outcome, in Youthful Offenders
U.
H.
of
Ashley,
ed.
Weeks,
Highfields,
ichigan Press, Ann Arbor (N. Siegel).

Presentations:
the
at
EEG
Electroshock
of
Process,
the
Correlates
1.
Eastern Psychiatric Research Association, February,
M.
N.Y.

2.

(Fink,

and Green, M.A.).

EEG
Changes
in
Significance of Individual Variability
During Electroshock Therapy, at Eastern Association
of Electroencephalographers, March, Montreal,

(Green, M.A.).

and
Drug Therapies
Convulsive
of
Studies
Experimental
in Psychiatry: TheoreticalNewImplications, at
York Society of
Neurological Society and
Clinical Psychiatry, March, N.Y. (Fink, M., Kahn,

R.L. and Green, M.A.).

Abnormal
and
Normal
and
in
Attention
Visual Perception
Children, at American OrthOpsychiatric Association,
March, N.Y. (Pollack, M.).

Patterns with Altered Brain Function, at
Eastern Psychological Association, April,
and
M.).
R.L.
Fink,
Kahn,
Philadelphia (Jaffe, J.,
and
F
Behavioral
Physiological
to
Score
of
Relation
Response with Altered Brain Function, at Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,

Communication
The

(Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.)

7.

with Space Occupying
Intellectual Deficits in Patients Eastern
Psychological
Lesions of the Cerebrum, at

Association, April, Philadelphia (Pollack, M.,
Battersby, W.S., Kahn, R.L. and Bender, M.B.).
Simultaneous
of
and
of
Stimulation
Perception
Intensity
Stimuli in Cerebral Dysfunction, at Eastern Psychol—
ogical Association, April, Philadelphia (Korin, H.).

�-3-

10.

Socio-Psychological ASpects of Diagnosis and Treatment:
Theoretical Implications, Symposium - Eastern
Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia,
(Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Drug Induced Changes in Interview Patterns, at
Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic, and
Sociologic Aspects of the Neuroleptic (tranquilizing)
Drugs in Psychiatry, April, Montreal (Fink, M.
_

and

11.

12.

16.
17.

18.

19.

Jaffe, J.).

Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences
in Behavioral Response to Convulsive Therapy, at
American Psychiatric Association, May, San
Francisco (Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.).
Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical
Response to Convulsive Therapy, at Electroshock
Research Association, May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L.
and Fink, M.).
EEG
on
of
Agent,
Diethazine,
Effects
Anticholinergic
and Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive
Therapy, at Society of Biological Psychiatry, May,
San Francisco (Fink, M.).
Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital, at American Psychiatric Association,
May, San Francisco (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, M.)
A Critique of "Pre-Conscious" Perception and the
"Poetzl Phenomenon," at American Psychiatric
Association, May, San Francisco (Pollack, M.).
Role of EEG Frequency Shift in Behavioral Effects of
&amp;
on
Neural.
Section
Psychiat. Queens
Drugs, at
County Medical Society, June, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post Convulsive
EEG and Behavior, American EEG Society, June,
Atlantic City (Fink, M.).
EEG and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents,
at Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psycho Pharmacologicum, September, Rome, and Eastern Association of
Electroencephalographers, December, N.Y. (Fink, M.).
Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy, at Eastern Psychiatric Research
Association, October, N.Y. (Kahn, R.L. and Pollack,
MI).

20.

Relationship between Seizure Threshold and Duration of
Seizures to EEG Change During Electroshock, at
Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers,
December, New York (M.Green).

�\\.\"

‘\

Soptubor 1,

1959

rm m2
mm

H.927

Dumb-at of mparimntal Psychiatry
HWPM
WEE
Glen
H.
L.

m,

1.

thmm

3.

3mm
8mm,

h.

Publications,

1951:

- 1959

5.

Presentations,

1951;

6.

Smnmry #1,

September 1.

- 1959
1951::
-

7.

Sunny #2,

Mary 1.

8.

Smmry #3,

April 1, 1957

2.

#1:,

February 1, 1959

Five Years, 199;

-

-

Sophombor

1956 ~

January 1, 1956

Am; 1,

- February

March Asaoomboa
EEG

1957

1, 1958

Ha:

(kparmanul

1, 1959

1959

Principal Investigator
Research Associates

I.

I.)

Psychology)

(Neurophysiology)

Technician

Secretuy

m,n.n.

Robert L. Kahn.Ph.Do
Hymn Karin, £11.13.

Eda M,M¢A.

Martin A.

momma.

mummﬁub.

19%4953
1958 ’
1956 .1951;

1959

‘-

1957
1956
Joseph Jaffe,M.D.
Donald F. K1o1n,24..n.
1959
Nathaniel 319301,Ph.D. 1958

«-

Georgo
Hanna Mosquera
Janet Baltic

Associates, supported throng: other grants:
Research Associate

Mouth

Associate
amorob Associate
Research Associate

(kperimntal Paydnol.)

( Psychiatry)

(Psychiatry)

(Sociolm)

Max

Pollackﬁhon.

.

«-

-

�he mm:

Amwhmr
reporwd here would nab have has: possible without the

interact and support of the Ecuador of Hillside 808mm, Dr. 18ml Sinus,
ﬂu Hard of Directors and the
Hr. Maurice
when
faith sustain“! an. pmm aux-mg its only uwnmau.

W,

mutter,

Wemﬂsoindcbtodtothexmmnnandmm
Ina-k, the Pomdntiona' Fund

for

Board of Nassau County and the

um
and

Rosearoh

I

Waumdﬂu

in Psychiatry, the 1mm Health

mm sum.
My Wane-la,

tonamg pharmoouticll

and Ranch Laboratories, Wyeth Laboratories,

Bristol Laboratories, thou support in amt-fully achnﬂadgod.

�3m.
m

Dam“

me labor-mm- of on
of Exparimntsl Psychiatry
oatsblishad so musics Homul in Smtmber, 1951:. During this fivc
your period mumpbyuoloéio, psychologc (personality and

pamptm),

linguistic, and sociolcgio upsets of 'soutic" psychiatric
have been tho pmipu [£001.

mums

1.

WC

The

Thong:

=,

visit or the convulsive

mnpy

process as the induction of a

nonnspeciftc state of altered brain function, similar to omnioosrsbnl

trams was supportcd

and

upliﬂed

(10, 11. 21). Within this altered

osrobn}. milieu, subjects were seen to respond in variom ways (26) ,
”lino:
m9}:
post "successful" no explicit verbal dsnial (7. 31). This

lotto)? adsptation was most prominent in chamooerclogioﬂly disposed

indvidmls (36).
J? in altshﬂon

bran function was pro-requisite to boluvionl
orange
Grand
m1 scams were column]. to this
26).
11,
8,
(7*
The alterations
but
(26)
induction
was
(34:2).
not
electrical
pm:
in mmfunction were measured in various ways including doom(6.n,12,2h,39), language patterns (h.7.3h.31.h3; Mb).
pen-mm mu (2,16,17,37,h63 magma) and tests of real]. (8).
1n

Wham
"v

I".

316mb

numbers

tho appsndix.

on to publications or pneumatic”

(B- )

listed in

�variety of beluvieml changes lure eeen during convulsive therapy
(26; 8-17). Such patterns were viewed as edepteticne to altered brain
A

Motion,

and were believed dependant upon

chencterologic end environ-

mental tactore (7, 25, 26, 36, ho). Clinical

retina: of

improvement

cbeemr or the behavioral change. in
the subject (26). Adaptations chmcterieed by denied www.mm
1n behavim' (13.17) and in language (7.
WM—
Such adaptations! were related to habitual node.

were new as value Judgments by the

W
or conduct (character,
The

ML
(inability

per-MW)

BMW

(36; 3-11, 32).

of the altered behavioral nodes wee noted ee

dependant upon the degree and duration of

mm

alterec breln function. the

expectatlone, an! the type and degree of family and

medical support. Different behavioral patterns were beet supported by

WIt m eke

typee or psychothonpy (19)..

that the ’nemphwelolcglcel beele of
lie in on duration in central emptic

suggeeted

M?

commune therepy any
cholinerglc - cannot-31c relationship, with a predominant
to
incremd cholinergic activity as the operationally significant

wt

:3th.

illumination: were based on the nutimdllp of man voltage EEG
Olav wave activity to behavioral change (6, 11, 26) and the blocking at

Such

poet-mun

;

electmgrephic and behavioral changee by central

entichonnergic agents (21; 3h: 35;

bl.

1&amp;2)

and by centre].

unpethwmtic

agents (ha).

”664%?

;;;m

u—

00'“

? 4, @3.

M‘,£~§.

W

m

4/: “3/93,”?1

will,

’?.L&lt;»Jv%ué~éiy.i

�-3.‘
Become of linguistic behavior in structured (7, 31) and unstructured
(1h, 29 ;

13-21.)

creaeed denial,

interviews shoved characteristic alterations towards in-

minutiae,

displacement, stereotypy and repetitivemes,

related to the degree of altered brain function (8.214). These changes were
blocked or reversed by enticholinsrgic

mlucinogm (21.

ha) .

Various perceptual tasks provided indices of behavioral, change and

were related to the degree of altered brain function. These included the

perception of cinulteneoue tactile

figures (37; 3-16),
color tigorcs (1:1).

and

stimli

(17), embedded (Gottschsbdt)

techistoaoopioelly exposed words (37) and

embedded

upsets or age, years of education, nativity and
degree of stereotypy and conventionslity (measured by Column F Scale)
were related to selection of therapy, duration or hospitalisation, e
diegmeie and treetsent response in hospitalised patients (15, 36,. to, 1:5).
Sooiopsyohologic

2.

Nsmmmlogio—Adspuve mom-1e of Sonauc' Theron.
Based on these studies, a hypothesis of the node of action of other

psydxistx'ic therapies such as insulin coho, leucotoav and psychotropic
drugs, was expressed (10, 33, 38). This View holds that the efficacy of

these therapies depends upon the indiction of states of altered brain
The
become
which
prominent.
in
adoptive
varying
mttems
my
much,
adaptive pettem is releted to the type, degree end duration of altered

brain function, the personality of the subject, and tolersnoes end
expectaﬂons of the environmnt.

Elicitation of this Wthesis as applied to drug therapies is our

in progmss, supported

by uspm greats 111.2092 and 111-2715.

'

'

�3.

Eula

Gena

Thong.

in iniﬂal case

yettem

e'mdy showed the significance both or denial

and peraieten’e

in insulin

coma

altered brain function for the behavioral change

(3)}
thenpy

In an insulin

chlorpruesim control stuck, no differences in
hospital. immanent ratings were observed in the eve treatmnt gronpl (27).
Chlorpruuine was eater, easier to administer, pernitted continued
coma

«-

administration and allowed for greater degrees or concurrent relatimehip
therapy then insulin

insulin
In.

eon-a.

These observations

cm by psychotropic

drugs

led to a mlaoenent

d

in thin institution.

Phameabherapz.

in evelmting various peyohophamoeutieele is
derived from then methane
and linguistic analyses of
intmenone
of
effects acute
azhinietretien and chronic clinical emu-tration of variom nu compound: are in progress. EEG patterns, along such
The ongoing program

Mamie

continue as eynehmiaatien-deeynahroniuﬂun and tmqnency units are being

related to behavioral (21, 3h,
The neuromyeiologic

141, 1:2)

and

linguistic changes (21,

1:3).

basis of experimentally induced hallucinogenic

etetee have also been interpreted as an alteration in synaptic chemical
relations, such that the effective levels of cholinergic activity is
decreased (ha).

Initial work

on

this hypotheail (21. ha) in

now

being

�WERE
195,

'mmWnumucm-mmw
Mann

WIWQWMWW.
mwnmmmmmmmum
mmuaummmmamrm; Mahatma!

W
mmummmmmmmm,m

W,
wmmmuarmmmm. mama“:
“Wt. Mad. W3;
and

Mummmuwmeuvﬂ. awning”
mmmuammwmwmmmmu
WMoututmdm.

�“Wm
mmuwdmdmw.

ammawmm
mmnmummummmmmw
wmmbﬂtwmm.ndatm,$m
mmmummmm

mmummumamm
mwam-uwummmrw,ummm
m.m,mmmmwmammsm

WQMWQIWWWMSwtu-umw

wwmmwammpammmmvs?
“1959; nmumwwmmummm
ammwmmmm,mmawmm

”www.mwmnuumm
Wumnmwm.mmmuw
mammwmaasgmmm
nmnm,mmmtnmmmnm

mamamwmtmmmmwmu:m

-muramn.t.mnummungnrmmmww

vmwmmmmmmma
am
QWWM.WWMW”M¢:M,10§
wmumu. mammmuamsmaumu

Wuwmumdthynm.

WWWuﬁMWq anti-Hum

mmmmuumxmnmnmmmumm

�Wﬁmmum, unlimpmmting Watfmofiu
tho It»?! also participated in tho Intomtiml
New
W.
Allied sum held in
Mansion
in
m mm.
and

on

cm:

in out: during the your mama tin

£111:an or
George Knuth-gr,- am. :and Dmld P. mm, 11.1).
"as
to the Bowman Dr. mutt L. m. “hr the
ﬂares-Mao, htttommammumd'ma‘ mmucnof

WW,

waist

of
Dr.
Hospital.
mum
POM,
11me
Jam
MW
wanna. manning ammuummummpmh
«ma tho patina: of Faculty Huber and Wu Director of
the
White
Hanson
at
mums.
mun
mm
conﬁrming mmttorthommm obhinndfmamﬁoudot

of

mm
Hum: of

Dix-om,

mm

m

the

mm

ham). mum at
prom
the mud sum mus mu: serum, and
mu
supper: from the

Health Board of 13mm county.

�Why
Wm
M

aunt-m «

.. 199

In I‘m. 11.».
Ian-u 1. Dan.

11.8.

mran-u. 3.3.
L.

in:

am

m. M.

I. m1,

W(up.W.
I'd.

M.

m

m.
m

15.3.

3.9.

mum”.
unh- Mn.
A.

3.».
um.

mun-emu,

Maul am

m
(Wily)
mu
m
(ham m)
m m Mb
(Win
W)
m
m
(mm)
m
um um (W)
Wh‘
'W)
(W
m
Ann-cw.

W
ma:unm(W)
Must. a

um

:- mm (mm)

m(m~ml

an.

'

*

'

(may)

M M.

m
mm
Jun

mum

�Hillside Hospital
Department of Experimental Psychiatry

Following is a chronologic list of the presentations and
publications of the members of the Department of Emperimental Psychiatry
during 1959.
A.

Publications:
1. Effect of an Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on EEG and Behavior:
Significance for Theory of Convulsive Therapy. Biological
&amp;
Grune
N. Y. pp. 18h-19h
ed.
Masserman,
chiat
P,
Stratton,
J.,
,
(Fink; Egg.
2. Alteration of Brain Fpnction in Therapy. Psychopharmacology Frontiers,
6d. Kline, No, Little, Brown &amp; COO, Boston, pp. 3 Fink, Mo .3. Significance of EEG Pattern Changes in Psychopharmacology.
g(Fink,
)
M. ).
2
:
398
(abst.
Neurophysiol._

EEG

Clin.

h. Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Intractabie Pain. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. and Ps chiat. ﬁl: 37-b2 (weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L.,
and Eargman, P.5.
5. Electroencephalographic and Behavioral Effects of Tofranil.
Psych. Assoc. J. g; 1665-1718 (Fink, M.).
6.

Canad.

Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences in Behavioral
Response to Convulsive Therapy, J. N.M. D. 128: 2h3-2h8 (Fink, M.,
Kahn, R. L., and Pollack, M.).

7. Effects of Diffuse Altered Brain Function on Perception, Phat
Int. Con . Ps chol., Publ. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 23 8- 239
(Fink, M., Kahn, R. L., and Korin, H. ).

8. Complex Visual Perception in Patients with Brain Tumor. Proc. XV Int.
Con . Ps chol., Pub1.North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 2 33-237
(gander, M. B., Battersby, w. 3., and Pollack, M. ).

1/5/60

�9. Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration of Brain Function on
h92Behavior, Con ess Re orts II Int. Con . Ps chiat
II:
h93 (Abst.
nk, M., Kahn, R. L., and Karin, H.5.
10.

EEG
of
Seizures
of
and
Duration
to
Degree
Threshold
Relationship of
Delta Activity Induced During Electroshock, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol.
g: 399 (Abst.) (Green, M.).

ll.

Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in Convulsive
Therapy, Dis. Nerv. Sys. g9: 180-184 (Kahn, R. L. and Pollack, M.).

12. Communication Networks in Freud's Interview Technique, Psych. Quat.
33: h56-h73 (Jeffe, J.).

13. Sociopsychologic ASpects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discha e Ratings
and Diagnosis, A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Ps chiat. l5 565-S7h Kahn, R. L.,
Pollack, M., and Fink, M.5.

Set in the Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli,
Jour. Psychol. 12.: 38h-392 (Korin, H. and Fink, M.).

The Role of
Am.

Perception Across Sensory Modalities,
(Abst.) (Krauthamer, G.).

Form

Am.

Psychol. lg; 396

16.

Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral Change
Following Induced Convulsions, The First International Congress
of Neurolo ical Sciences (III: §EG Clinical Neurosﬁgsiology and
Epilepsy5, PBrgamon, London, pp. 513—519 (Fink, M., Kahn, R.L.,
and Karin, H.).

17.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshcnk Therapy,

J. Neuropsychiatgy l; h5-h9

(Kahn, R. L. and

fink,

M=).

18. Symbolic Reorganization in Brain Injuries, in Handbook of Paychiatgy,
ed. Arieti, 3., Basic BOOkS, No Yo, V01. I, pp. 9 "9 l
(Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.).

�B.

Presentations:

l.

EEG

and Ebhavioral Effects of Tofranil, International Conference on
Depression and Allied States, Montreal (Fink, M.).

2. Sociopsychologic Factors Affecting Therapist-Patient Relationships,
American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Philadelphia (Kahn, R.L.).
3. Effect of Induced Cerebral Dysfunction in Man on Tachistoscopic
Perception of Embedded Color Figures, Eastern Psychologic
Association, Atlantic City (Pollack, M.).

h. Behavioral Changes with Different Methods of Induced Cerebral
Dysfunction, Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City
(Karp,

E.).

5. Sociopsychologic Aspects of Peychiatric Treatment, Eastern
R.
(Kahn,
L.).
City
Atlantic
Association,
Psychological

6. Language Patterns as Measures of Behavioral and Neurophysiologic
Change, American Psychiatric Association, Philadelphia (Fink, M.).
7. Personality Correlates of
(Krauthamer, G.).

EEG,

Metropolitan

EEG

Society,

8. Relation of Social Attitude to Psychiatric Treatment,
Meeting, A.P.A., New York (Kahn, R.L.).

9.

Comparison of

New York

N. Y.

Divisional

Intellectual Functioning in Childhood, Adolescent and

Adult Schizophrenics, N. Y. Divisional Meeting, A.P A.,
(Pollack, M.).

New York

10. Symposium on "Paycholinguistic Analysis of the Psychiai‘ic Interview",
N. Y. Divisional Meeting, A.P.A., New York (Jaffe, :.).
11. Social Background and the Doctor-Patient Relationship, Acad.
Psychoanalysis, New York (Jaffe, J.).

�Hillside Hospital
Department of Experimental Psychiatry

Following is a chronologic list of the presentations and
publications of the members of the Department of Experimental Psychiatry
during 1959.
A.

Publications:
1. Effect of an Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on EEG and Behavior:
Significance for Theory of Convulsive Therapy. Biological
Ps chiat , ed. Masserman, J., Grune &amp; Stratton, N. Y. pp. 18h-19h
(F%:E, M.;.

Alteration of Brain Function in Therapy. Psychopharmacology Frontiers,
ed. Kline, N., Little, Brown &amp; 00., Boston, pp.
-3
, . .
3. Significance of EEG Pattern Changes in FBychopharmacology.
g(Fink,
)
M. ).
398
(abet.
Neurophysiol._2:

EEG

Clin.

.

Effect of Electroconvulsive Theraﬁg on Intr:1ctabm Pai A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. and ngchiat. Ql: 37- (weinstein, E. A., hahn, R. L.,
and

rgman, P. .

Electroencephalographic and Behavioral Effects of Tofrénil. Canad.
14.3 1663“].715 (Fink, Mo).
ASSOC.
J.
szch.
Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences in Behavioral
Reaponse to Convulsive Therapy, J.N.M.D. lag; 2h3-2h8 (Fink, M.,
Kahn, R. L., and Pollack, M.).
7. Effects of Diffuse Altered Brain Function on PercWptio Prsc. XV
Int. Con . P chol., Publ. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 53 3- 239
(335E, M., Kahn, R. L., and Korin, H. ).
Complex Visual Perception in Patients with Brain Tumor. Proc. XV
Cong. Psychol., Publ. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 2 33-?37
n er, M. B., Battersby, w. 3., and Pollack, M. ).

1/5/60

Int.

�“beam,

9. Therapy of Schizophrenia:
Behavior,

h93

C

as

Re

14.,

Alteration of Brain Function on
1:92Con . Ps chia
rts II Int.
II:
,
H321
'£.""‘EER"',
orinL",
‘.
an
hn,

Role of

10.

Relationship of Threshold and Duration of Seizures to Degree of EEG
Delta Activity Induced During Electroshoclc, EEG. Olin. Neurophzsiol.
_2_: 399 (Abst.) (Green, M.).

11.

Progncs tic Application

of Psychological Techniques in Convulsive
Therapy, Dis. Nerv. Sys. g9: 180-184 (Kahn, R. L. and Pollack, M.).

12. Communication Networks in Freud’s Interview Technique, Psych. Bust.
23: 156-1473 (Jaﬁ‘e, J.).
13. Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discha e Ratings
and Diag10818, AeMeAe Arch. Gene P3 Chiate ;: 565-571; Kahn, Re Lo,

Pollack,

M. '.
14., and—Tink"—‘T,

1h. The Role of Set in the Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli,
Am. Jour. Psychol. 1g: 38h-392 (Korin, H. and Fink, M.).

tion Across Sensory Modalities,

Psychol. 3;: 396

15.

Form Perce

16.

Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral Change
Following Induced Convulsions, The First Internatior; 3.1 Congress
of Neurolo ica3_Sciences (LII: EEG, Clinical Neurop._,jsiolog and
Epilepsy), ﬁrgamon, London, pp. 13- 19 ink, M. , v-iahn, R.L.,
and Karin, H.) .

(Abst. (Krauthamer, G.).

Am.

1?. Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshntrk Therapy,
J. Neuropgychiatg l: h5-h9 (Kahn, R. L. and :nk, ).
18. Symbolic Reorganization in Brain Injuries, in Handbook of Pa hia
ed. Arieti, 3., Basic Books, N. Y., Vol. I, pp. '935-931
(Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, Re Le).

;

�B.

Presentations:
1.

EEG

and Behavioral Effects of Tofranil, International Conference on
Depression and Allied States, Montreal (Fink, M.).

2. Sociopsychologic Factors Affecting Therapist-Patient Relationships,
American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Fhiladelphia (Kahn, R.L.).
Man
on Tachistoscopic
Cerebral
Induced
in
Dysfunction
of
3. Effect
Perception of Embedded Color Figures, Eastern Paychologic
Association, Atlantic City (Pollack, M.).

h. Behavioral Changes with Different Methods of Induced Cerebral
Dysfunction, Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City
(Karp, E0).

5. Sociopsychologic Aspects of Paychiatric Treatment, Eastern
R.
(Kahn,
L.).
City
Atlantic
Association,
Psycholqgical

6. Language Patterns as Measures of Behavioral and Neurophysiologic
M.).
(Fink,
American
Fhiladelphia
Association,
Paychiatric
Change,
7. Personality Correlates of
(Krauthamer, G.).

EEG,

Metropolitan

LEG

Society,

8. Relation of Social Attitude to Psychiatric Treatment,
Meeting, A.P.A., New York (Kahn, R.L.).

9.

Comparison of

New York

N. Y.

Divisional

Intellectual Functioning in Childhood, Adolescent and

Adult Schizophrenics, N. Y. Divisional Meeting, A.P,A.,
(Pollack, M.).

New York

10. Symposium on "Pbycholinguistic Analysis of the Piychiai-ic Interview",
N. Y. Divisional Meeting, A.P.A., New York (Jaffe, q.).
11. Social Background and the Doctor-Patient Relationship, Acad.
Psychoanalysis, New York (Jaffe, J.).

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67284">
                <text>Progress and annual reports; research activities (folder title).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67285">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67286">
                <text>mfp-03-01-001-0-006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67287">
                <text>1958-1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67288">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67289">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67290">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67291">
                <text>Department of experimental psychiatry annual reports; Letter acknowledging that Fink will receive the first A. E. Bennett Neuropsychiatric Research Foundation award; Newspaper clipping, Long Island Daily Press, Psychiatrists will honor L.I. Doctor; Lists of publications of the members of the department of experimental psychiatry; Newspaper clipping, MD Records Brain Waves of Patients; Summary 1954-1959; </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67292">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67293">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80931">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87492">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94053">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100614">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6730" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6538">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c8ad48ee340bb2be9a377798690b07da.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3394a0c397923bbc0e9ed1a479ee352e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107143">
                    <text>K

.

K.

K

K
K

.K

y

»

K

K

.

,

a

.

K

.
K

r

KK

.

K

K

K

K

.

K

K

.
K.

K

KKK

K

K

K

K

.

.

KI

.
_

KK

K

K

K

K

.

K

K

K
K

K

K

K

K

K

K
K

.

K
K

A

K

K
K

K

K

K
K

K

K

.

K

.K
K

K

K

_

K

K

K

K

K

K

S

.

K

K

.

KK
K

K

.

K

K

K

K.

_

K

K

K

K

K

.

_

K

K

K

K
K

KK

K
K

K

K

K

_

K.

K

_

K

K

K

‘
K

.K

K

K

K
K

_

K

K

.K

K

K

K

K

K

K

K

.

KK

K

.\

K

K

KKK.KK

I.

K.

K

.K
K
K

e? .p
.

K.

K

Jr
K.

.

K

K.

K

K

K

K

KK

.
.

w

.

K

_

.K

K

K.

K

.

K
K.

K

K
K
.

.

_
K

K

K

K
K

.

.

K

K

K

K.

KK

K
K

K
K

.

K

K

K

_

K

K

K

K

K
K

K

.K

K

_

K

K

.

K

K

K

K

K

K

K

K

K

K

K

K

_

K

K

K

.

.

K

K

K

K

K

K

K

K
K
K

K

K
K

K

K

K
K

K

K .

K

K

K

KK

.K

.
K

�2

9th

Annual Report

JANUARY 1, 1956—DECEMBER 31, 1956

Glen Oaks, Queens
FOUNDED 1927

Joseph S.

A.

Miller, M. D., Medical Director

AN AFFILIATE OF THE FEDERATION

OF NEW YORK

0F JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES

�Hillside Hospital is a non-profit, non-sectarian mental hospital for the treatment
of voluntary patients suffering from early and curable mental symptoms.
Patients are admitted regardless of their ability to pay.
Hillside provides training for physicians in post-graduate psychiatry and psychotherapy and puts major emphasis on research in all phases of treatment. The
hospital considers itself a pilot institution, pioneering in the human and efficacious application of psychiatry to the mentally ill.
The hospital is licensed in the New York State Department of Mental Hygiene.
It is approved for a two-year residency in psychiatry by the Council on Medical
Education of the American Medical Association, the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and the American College of Surgeons. The Dental
Department is certified by the American Dental Association as an approved
hospital department.
Hillside Hospital is an affiliate of the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies and a
participant of the United Hospital Fund and the Greater New York Fund.

HIGHLIGHTS
Page 3

Hillside gets Ford grants

Israel Strauss Adolescent Pavilion in its second year

.

.

.

.

Page 6

.

.

.

.

Page 10

Hillside affiliating institution for student nurses at Queens college

.

Page 11

Social Service strengthens rehabilitation program

.

Page 14

.

Chlorpromazine added to regular hospital drug formulary

Research program strengthened

.

.

.

.

.

Page 18

�1956 has been a year of “Shakedown" for Hillside during which its Board and
Executive Officers have experienced the first full year of operation without the
supporting advice of its founder, Dr. Israel Strauss, who died during 1955. In
view of the change throughout the organization of the hospital, it has been a
year of consolidation and improvement.
We are indebted to Dr. Dudley D. Shoenfeld, our Vice President, for his invaluable counsel in helping to reorganize the staff planning in the hospital. He was
greatly assisted in this work by Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller, Dr. Simon Kwalwasser

REPORT
OF THE
PRESIDENT
OF THE
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS

and Maurice Bachrach.

has frequently been necessary for the Governing Board to ask advice and
guidance from the Medical Board. We have had splendid cooperation from them.
The two presidents of the Medical Board serving through the calendar year,
Dr. Samuel Atkin and Dr. David Epstein, have been particularly helpful.
It

During 1956, the hospital has been able to expand its services in the OutPatient Department through the use of funds made available by the State Mental
Health Authority through the N. Y. State Department of Mental Hygiene, and
funds from the City of New York through the New York City Community Mental
Health Board. Further funds from the City of New York for indigent mentally ill
persons have enabled the hospital to maintain its services at a high level and to
serve that segment of the community which most needs the services of a philan-

thropic hospital.

The research program, conducted at Hillside under the guidance of Dr. Maximilian Fink, has made excellent progress. The directors continue their deep
interest in all areas of psychiatric research and anticipate further broadening of
these activities. Psychiatry as a science still is in a rather fluid state and many
new avenues of exploration offer hope and ideas. The compelling need is to look
intensely for new information. At long last, throughout the United States, substantial organizations have become cognizant of these needs. Among these, the
great Ford Foundation has allocated many millions specifically for research in
psychiatry. In addition, large sums have been allocated to the country’s hospitals. In 1956, Hillside received a grant of $104,000.
At Hillside we

bring a sympathetic attitude to our patients, solace and encouragement to their families and decided improvement to a large proportion of the
persons we treat. We make judicious use of all modern therapies available in the
field and our record of improvement is excellent. We can be proud of it. But we
aspire to find new and better techniques that will send more patients out of the
hospital completely “recovered” rather than “improved”; new methods that will
permit release of patients in a far shorter time than is now required.
to these goals that we at Hillside are dedicated and we firmly believe that,
as elsewhere in medicine, these aims can only be achieved by means of widespread and continued research.
It is

Alvin E. Coleman

�REPORT
OF THE
MEDICAL
DIRECTOR

During 1956, Hillside Hospital completed almost thirty years of continuous
operation, rendering high-level psychiatric services to the community. During
these three decades, the Hospital increased its bed capacity for inpatients fivefold, established a ranking place as a therapeutic center for both inpatients and
outpatients, became a notable hospital for resident training in the field of
psychiatry and, in the past few years, developed an important research department. For over eight years, it has been a proud member of the family of the
Federation of Jewish Philanthropies and, in conjunction with other agencies in
Federation, it has developed and rendered meaningful aftercare and rehabilitative services.
During the past year, there was an improvement in the coordination of professional services rendered in both the adult and adolescent inpatient departments.
There was considerable expansion in our outpatient service with improvement
of procedures and treatment in the aftercare clinic. Our practical experience
with the Adolescent Pavilion and our attempts to augment our research programs have pointed up the need for expansion, both in personnel and in space.
Every few years the advent of some special form of physical treatment—shock,
surgery, and now new drugs—has reopened the debate concerning so-called

specific versus non-specific treatments, short-term versus long-term hospitalization and therapy, treatment of many patients or clients rather than a few. All
of these can really be related to the general question of the importance of quality
versus quantity. One of the distinguishing features of American medicine is its
goal and also, think, its practice of rendering qualitatively better medical
services, as opposed to mere quantification.
I

Hillside Hospital has developed a distinctive philosophy which has led to the
creation of a unique structure to implement its philosophy. Since the field of
psychiatry is still in its developmental stages, it is characterized by frequent and
rapid changes in all phases of its thinking and practice. Each change is a challenge to the Hospital’s established structures and points of view and we must
continually decide whether a psychotherapy-centered, multi-disciplined treatment program such as ours delivers the best service that can be devised for the
relatively long-term curable patient.
How is a mental patient best served by a psychiatric hospital? This, of course,
will depend on the type of mental patient. Some patients are easily treated by a
consultation or two, by a course of shock treatment, or with tranquilizing drugs,
or with a rest or vacation. Some need only a course of physical treatment with

return within a month or two to their homes, to continue whatever treatment
they may need in a clinic or with a private psychiatrist. Others, and these are the
ones that Hillside has more experience with, require hospitalization of at least
six to twelve months. These are patients who cannot or should not remain at
home or in the community, and cannot therefore benefit from either a single
psychiatrist's or clinic’s ministrations but rather need the hospital milieu or
therapeutic environment of a team of professionals working with the patient, with

�a psychiatrist at the center to emotionally re-educate the patient. Such emotional re-education through the process of properly understood and related inliving experiences lead to a patient becoming aware of emotional aspects that
he did not suspect he had before and to recognize that there are more people
who care rather than so many who are hostile to him. If at the same time, as at
Hillside, important relatives, especially the nearest of kin are worked with by a

professional trained in that field, the psychiatric social worker, the family's
attitudes concerning the patient and his illness are changed for the better; and
if this happens, the patient now has not only regained much of his lest esteem
and self-confidence, but the very family environment has been improved and
guarantees that the patient may continue and even enlarge upon gains initially
made in the hospital. Thus, not only a single patient has been treated, but there
has been complete reorientation of an entire family.

Authorities in dynamic psychiatry, in child welfare and development, in community welfare, in the field of geriatrics, all agree that the most important ingredient in the total treatment of emotional problems at any age, is the psychological understanding and the meaning of the symptoms, even the physical ones,
as various ways of attempting to meet the problems of anxiety and emotional
crises. Of the various psychological and dynamic approaches to the problems of
behavior, none have contributed as much as psychoanalysis. Hence the practice
of hospital psychoanalytic psychiatry at Hillside. This is by no means to lessen
the importance of the adjunctive services and especially of the medical and
physical agents. The physical symptoms are often parallel or concomitant expressions of 'certain types of emotional distress and emotional disorder; and physical
agents like drugs, are often very effective in shortening periods of acute panic
or distress and thus allowing for earlier or more meaningful participation in
psychotherapy. Since the problems of emotional disorder are mainly interpersonal ones, problems of getting along properly or happily with other people,
psychotherapy whether in or out of a hospital is in our opinion the basis of all
therapy of persons with severe emotional disturbances.
The past year has been characterized by a rapid growth of psychiatric services
in general hospitals. These, by their very nature, deal with more acute physical
and mental disorders, while special psychiatric hospitals treat those psychiatric
problems which specifically require more extensive hospitalization, removal from
home and community for a long enough period to afford an opportunity for reeducation and resocialization of the patient. It is therefore clear that the two
types of hospitals deal with different problems and have different basic principles, precisely because they deal with different types of patients. The growth
of the general hospital practice of psychiatry is therefore not a factor toward

the displacement of the special hospital but rather for the widening and enrichment of the total constellation of treatment services available to psychiatry, so
that the general and special hospitals enhance and reinforce each other for the
benefit of all patients.

Joseph S. A. Miller, MD.

�ADOLESCENT PAVILION
Age range of patients

The Israel Strauss Adolescent Pavilion is now in its second year. It is a dramatic
example of the kind of pioneering Hillside Hospital does.
The Pavilion provides a treatment program for emotionally disturbed girls between the ages of 12 and 16. It is an unusual experiment in tackling a major
problem of our society . . . the rehabilitation of girls who are unable to live and
function successfully in the community.

Practical aspects of
treatment

Grave concern with the number of severely disturbed young people in our country
has not resulted in enough practical work. The Adolescent Pavilion is a brave
in
all
and
facilities
with
the
deal
this
experience
to
problem,
using
attempt
psychiatric therapy of the Hillside Hospital in a treatment program oriented to
the special needs of these patients. The number of girls who can be treated is
very small compared to the need. But the knowledge to be gained from experience with them should prove immensely valuable.

Flexibility of program

The Adolescent Pavilion has its own, specially-designed living quarters and
treatment facilities, and a separate staff. Its program is necessarily fluid and
flexible enough to allow the constant adjustments necessary in a new and
untried field. Some changes from original plans became necessary as work
progressed this year. Twenty patients were admitted in 1956 and 25 discharged. Capacity of the Pavilion was reduced to 16 since it proved impossible
to work successfully with the 20 originally planned.

Basic treatment philosophy

The basic treatment philosophy remains the same. The aim is to provide a
wholesome living experience within the Pavilion with as intensive psychotherapy
as seems advisable for the individual patient. But the concept of such a wholesome experience has gradually, step by step, taken in more areas, personnel
and facilities beyond the Pavilion’s confines. As soon as girls are able, they are
encouraged to use recreational and planned activities at the main hospital, to
make contacts with the other staff there and to socialize with adult patients. As
they are able, the girls are permitted to go to the nearby public high school and
out into the community. A basic concern is to try to help with those aspects of
the personality that are ill while never forgetting to encourage arid develop those
that remain healthy.

Family or family-type

Work with parents or parent substitutes is intensive and a very important part
of the treatment. When they are able, the girls are permitted and encouraged to
spend time with family or friends. Some girls, unfortunately, have no family to
go to. The use of volunteer help to fill this vacuum is being further explored.

After-care and follow-up

Another important need is the provision of after-care and follow-up. Unlike the
mature patient, the Pavilion deals with personalities not yet fully formed. Their
potential is unknown. It takes time to find out how fruitful the work will be. It
had been hoped that close follow-up would be possible by providing after-care

relationships

�for all the girls in the Hillside Out-Patient Clinic. This proved impractical because it interfered too much with the ordinary pursuits of young people who,
in most cases, lived at great distances from the hospital. For those girls who
cannot conveniently use the Clinic, a variety of good treatment facilities elsewhere are recommended.

encouraging to report that referrals to the Pavilion have come this year
from more widespread sources, including a variety of family and social agencies,
schools, treatment centers, private physicians and girls' residence clubs. It is
also encouraging to report that, while it is too soon to reach any conclusions
from the work in progress, the hospital does feel the work of the Adolescent
Pavilion is becoming increasingly helpful.
It is

Prognosis for the future

�I

7‘"

.

«F

‘
HillSIde
In 1956
treated 561
ts,
of ”709189 hospital days. The
e-‘ﬁ
Q‘ﬁt‘rhte were
patients. Of theﬁital treated», 365

ﬁne

Evaluatipnﬁg

discharged

:-

.

’

'

I

I;

eme

'.

I
Is

.

5

',

I

I

2
__

way f.

ou come

In

a

~

I.

’

gcomparison.

-

f

‘quOﬁ
rials».

"

ndon nt

'

‘

to denote mental condition at the time of
Idischarg
ient’ 5 condition gmbebaviqr
he
en
left This is g
'uII a}; I:
‘

1"7.”
:
'
o’

I

‘

_

I

I

.

I

I

no chan-e

I

"”3

'_

.'

.-

or

’

f

I

:
I

I

ﬁle-5V;

"j

'

m“

iable Rent; m

that symptoms have disapﬁbare nd the patient
conseemeﬁn
good
‘e'ans
Ion at the hospital, but there is no certainty of how he will function when he
Eats back into I own an ial and working community;
recovered means that, in
“i
has bee
ef‘mucharrlﬁrmd
reas
c

ad
.
tioma‘t

'

I.

atient will be
or better" I; he did befor
‘

1
-I

r

3“

.92
*I

f
_

"1""
.

_

I

’

.

mandfuw;¥

tmhﬁ

tateat

I

Mu

,,

.

lmpr.
4O

36
39

.

�m

O S PIT

�PSYCHOTHERAPY AND MEDICAL SERVICES
Major process of

Psychotherapy continues to be the major emphasis and the core of treatment
at Hillside Hospital. Other forms of therapy, each in its own way very important
to the patient’s progress, are all part of the treatment program and are prescribed according to the patient’s particular needs. However, one of the main
criteria for accepting patients at the hospital is their ability to participate
profitably in psychotherapy.

Analysis of hospital

Patients are seen individually by well-qualified psychiatrists for psychoanalytically oriented treatment three or four times a week. Each patient is assigned
to a specific psychiatrist who remains ”his doctor” for the length of his stay.
The psychiatrist is the leader of the hospital “team” that plans and supervises
the patient’s day-to-day treatment. The other members of the team are a psychiatric social worker, a psychologist, professional representatives of the
adjunctive services — Occupational Therapy, Group Activities and Creative
Therapy — and the Nursing Department.

Types of therapy in use,
including new drug
therapies . . . facilities for
treating the “whole" patient:
physically and
psychotherapeutically

Group therapy continues to be used for selected patients. The hospital continues
the use of electroshock therapy for about one-third of patients, especially those
suffering from more severe emotional disorders. The extent to which it is used
has, in many cases, been modified in accordance with the results of research
conducted by the Department of Experimental Psychiatry. During 1956, as a
result of a controlled research study, Chlorpromazine was substituted for insulin
coma in certain patients. It had been found safer, easier to administer, and to
have fewer side effects. For certain other patients at the hospital, insulin coma
is still the treatment of choice. Chlorpromazine has now been added to the drug
formulary of the hospital and made part of the regular therapeutic procedures.
There is continuing work and interest at Hillside in Reserpine and the other
newly developed drug therapies.

Growth of non-psychiatric

The Intra-mural Clinic and allied medical services of the hospital are concerned
with the non-psychiatric, physical problems of the patient. Close cooperation
between the medical staff and the psychiatric staff has brought the hospital
nearer its goal of “treating the whole patient.”

hospital treatment

treatment “team"

medical services

The lntra-mural Clinic

The continued cooperation of a large visiting staff in all the various branches
of medicine, made it possible for the clinic to see 411 patients for a total of
11,844 visits this year.
The Dental Department

10

The Dental Department, newly certified by the American Dental Association as
a qualified hospital dental department, anticipates adding a dental intern to
the staff. New equipment and a newly decorated interior have done much to
facilitate and improve treatment. The dental clinic treated 736 patients this
year, an increase of almost 25% over 1955.

�f

.

The Psychology Department, in response to increased demand for psychological
examinations, added one full-time psychologist this year and provided for the
addition of two more early in 1957. Almost twice as many tests were admin-

The Psychology Department

istered this year as last.

The department has been accepted and used as an integral member of the
hospital team. Its services have been called for in pre-testing hospital personnel,
and in connection with vocational counselling and rehabilitation plans worked
out by the Social Service Department.
The Nursing Department continues to pioneer in training nurses and aides in
the special skills required for proper care of the mentally ill. The nurse fulfills a
unique position in being in direct contact with the patient for long period of time.
And yet the only training she generally receives in psychiatry is a brief threemonth period during student training. This department has organized two special training programs, one for psychiatric aides and one for nurses, which
enable them to perform more effectively and with more understanding as working members of the hospital team.

addition, members of the professional nurse staff participated in trips to
various private and state psychiatric hospitals to observe new methods and
techniques.
In

During the past year, students from Central lslip continued visits to Hillside as
part of their psychiatric training. This year, Hillside became the affiliating institution for basic psychiatric experience for student nurses at Queens College. The
hospital was fortunate in acquiring for its own staff 10% of the college’s first

graduating class.

The Nursing Department

�Three departments of the hospital, make an essential contribution to each
patient’s therapy. Each has a specific function and each is prescribed as a
regular part of treatment planned in cooperation with the psychiatric staff.
Group Activities
Department

The Group Activities Department organizes meaningful social, educational and
work activities that draw patients into groups where they will have opportunities
to form relationships with other patients and deal with situations that mirror
community life.
Each member of the department’s staff of professional social group workers
is assigned as a member of a psychiatric team which plans a program designed
to meet a patient’s specific problems. The group worker reports on the patient’s

performance and reactions to group ‘and social situations.

.Under the guidance of the staff, patients participate in self-government groups,
special interest classes, a choral group, athletic activities, and current events
discussions; they publish a newspaper, operate a patients’ library and engage in
club activities suited to various age levels. In addition, they plan and take part
in social functions, attend religious services and enjoy a varied program of
evening entertainments which frequently include appearances by outstanding
celebrities who generously give their time and talent.
This year has seen the development of an adult education program, in conjunction with Adelphi College, which, in a ten-week course, offers popular subjects similar to those offered by the extension programs of universities and the
New York City Board of Higher Education.

Occupational Therapy
Department

Occupational Therapy the patient works in various crafts such as ceramics,
wood, metal, leather, jewelry making, weaving and needlework. They offer him
a creative outlet that increases his self-confidence, helps him to discover new
skills and has therapeutic value in relieving tensions. By observing the way a
patient reacts to tools and materials, how he copes with success or failure and
how he carries out instructions and responds to authority, the staff is able to
gauge his problems and his progress.
In

1956 two registered therapists were added to the staff, bringing the total to
six. Each therapist is part of the hospital team that plans the occupational program for each patient according to the patient's needs.
In

This year, for the first time, craft classes were scheduled which offer patients
interested in particular crafts an opportunity for more intensive and specialized
instruction. Another innovation was that the Commissary, a patient-run store,
was brought under the direction of this department and patients were assigned
there by doctor's prescription as a form of vocational training.

12

�distinguished visitor this year was Miss Ruth Shamah, Israeli delegate to the
World Federation of Occupational Therapists, who spent three months at Hillside
working and observing the methods used in the department.
A

Creative Therapy is a very special psychodiagnostic and therapeutic tool de~
vised by Dr. Ernest Zierer and his associate, Mrs. Edith Zierer. It consists of a
series of controlled painting tests designed to reveal the patient's unconscious
conflicts. The results are tabulated and interpreted in diagrams which present
a “personality profile” considered to be a reflection of the patient’s ability to
solve his life problems.

Creative Therapy
Department

The department administered 1,423 tests during the year. In addition to regular
consultations with the hospital team, progress reports were discussed at special
conferences with treating psychiatrists and the supervisors.

I3

�THE PATIENT

Work of the Social

Service Department

The Social Service Department is the patient’s most direct and constant link
with his family and the community outside the hospital. Its activities before
admission, during the patient’s stay at the hospital and after he leaves, make
easier both for the patient and for his family the many adjustments necessary
to meet the economic and emotional problems that complicate successful

treatment.

14

Number of yearly
interviews and contacts

the course of its work this year, the Social Service Department conducted
5,137 interviews with patients, 5,095 interviews with relatives, 7,555 telephone
contacts with social agencies and 6,701 telephone contacts with relatives of
patients. The department processes all admissions, functions actively throughout the patient’s stay and is intimately concerned with the patient’s welfare on
discharge and for several months thereafter.

Rehabilitation aspects of the
social service program

the past year the department has made a concentrated effort to strengthen
the rehabilitation aspects of the social service program of the hospital. Experience has shown that the best results are achieved when maximum support is
extended immediately on discharge and continued through the first six months
to a year. Future plans are particularly concerned with opening up new avenues
of cooperation with community agencies whose services can do so much to
help the patient again become a useful and happy member of his community.
In 1956 the following agencies have made marked and increased contributions
in this connection.

Contributing agencies
to rehabilitation programs

The Foster Home Program, which exists jointly with the Jewish Community
Service of Long Island, was used to place newly discharged patients in a supervised family environment. This year the program also was used for patients
awaiting admission to the hospital, with the result that hospitalization was
averted in at least one case.

In

In

'

�AND THE COMMUNITY
The Altro Workshop which provides discharged patients with transitional gainful
employment was used by thirteen patients during 1956.
Through a grant by Mrs. Israel Strauss and the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies, a joint program with the Jewish Family Service of New York was initiated. This service permits discharged patients who need further counseling to
get immediate help. Expansion of this service is expected to show the value of
continued and prompt counseling in averting rehospitalization.

Together with the Jewish Family Service of Long Island, the department developed a special program that helps keep the home intact when a mother has to
be hospitalized. Homemakers are assigned to fill the gap during the mother’s
absence and sometimes even after the mother returns, if this seems necessary.
The program with the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation has been expanded.
A vocational counselor is available to patients one day a week. Vocational guidance begins while the patient is still in the hospital and may continue after
discharge. Training facilities are provided for those whose adjustment to the
community might be made easier by learning new skills.
The department is especially appreciative of the cooperation of the New York
City Department of Education. The Home Instruction Program provides two
teachers who come to the hospital several days a week to give instruction to
patients under 21 who have not completed high school. The results have been
very successful; 40 patients received instruction this year and six were graduated. During the coming year the program will be expanded to include patients
over 21, who, on completing the work, will be able to take High School Equivalency examinations. Follow-up reports indicate that many patients develop an
interest in carrying their education further after leaving the hospital.
The Casework Program started last year in the After-Care Clinic, for the purpose
of coordinating rehabilitative planning, has proven its effectiveness and is now
an established service offered to patients and their families.
The Social Service Department has continued to work very closely with the
Federation Employment and Guidance Service. Their excellent facilities make it
possible for many patients to receive job placement and vocational guidance
soon after leaving the hospital.

15

�HILLSIDE LEAGUE
The Hillside League and the
work of “The Bridge"

The Hillside League is an organization of former patients of Hillside Hospital.
After facing almost certain extinction in 1954 and having an encouraging revival
in 1955, it has made astonishing strides in the past year. That many of its
planned goals have been achieved is due, in large measure, to the untiring and
selfless efforts of “The Bridge, Inc.", a group of women and their husbands who
conducted a successful fund raising drive and who continue in their wholehearted devotion to the League.

Activities at
Bridge headquarters

1956, the Hillside League moved to new quarters (supplied by “The Bridge”)
at 231 West 83rd Street, in Manhattan. Here, in an area many times the size of
its original rooms, members enjoy a comfortable, newly furnished lounge,
equipped with a phonograph, television, table games and cards. The area is
flexible enough to provide for large groups as well as intimate gatherings. The
League is open every evening from Monday through Friday and one week-end a
month for large social functions.

Help with personal

Hillside psychiatric social worker has been assigned as a full-time director of
the League and is available for individual consultation and for referral service
with regard to housing, employment, further treatment and other personal welfare problems. Thanks again to the efforts of “The Bridge,” the volunteer staff
of the League has grown to meet the needs of a much larger membership.

Membership

From a low of 38 in 1954, the active membership has grown to almost 200, and
in addition the League draws upon an active mailing list of almost 500. A club
program, with membership arranged according to age group and interest has
been an important development made possible by the increased membership

welfare problems

In

A

and staff.

The Hillside League looks forward to the next year as one in which it will be
well equipped to fulfill a vital function in helping patients continue the progress
made at the hospital.

QUEENS OUT-PATIENT CLINIC
Hillside Hospital believes that in the Queens Out-Patient Clinic it has developed
a pilot unit that demonstrates the highest level of clinical functioning and serves
as a center for stimulating interest and training in psychiatry.
Work of the clinic

16

The Clinic offers psychotherapy on a twice-a-week basis, up to a year’s duration,
to residents of Queens, Nassau and Suffolk Counties, who require treatment but

�are unable to pay for private care. For a family with an average income psychiatric service can become a severe economic burden. The Clinic meets an
urgent need in a community rapidly growing in population but relatively lacking
in out-patient psychiatric facilities. The Clinic setting, in addition, offers the
advantage of psychiatric social work consultation for members of the patient’s

family.

’

Intensive screening, by means of psychological tests and pre-admission consultation, make it easier for the treating psychiatrist to make early plans for
the patient's treatment program. In contrast to the usual lengthy course of
psychiatric treatment, the Clinic has developed a philosophy of attempting to
accomplish limited goals. Often, by relieving his symptoms, the Clinic frees a
patient to continue on with his life, with the strengths he utilized before he
became ill.
The Clinic treated 271 patients in 1956, the average length of treatment being
eight months. Thirty psychiatrists, accepted after very careful selection, work on

a part-time basis to make this extensive program possible. Permanent staff

Goal of the clinic's

treatment program

Number of patients
and staff members

members of the Hospital are always available for consultation.

1956, the Clinic initiated a separate service for administering electroshock
therapy on an out-patient basis. Recovery, on the whole, was dramatic, rapid
and tremendously appreciated by the patient and family since it meant avoiding
hospitalization.
In

MANHATI‘AN AFTER-CARE CLINIC
The Manhattan After-Care Clinic serves Hillside patients as a link between their
hospital stay and the resumption of community life. This is often a very trying
time because the patient may suddenly be subjected again to old family
stresses, job strains and social difficulties. The Clinic, conveniently located at
Mt. Sinai Hospital, is open five nights a week and the
average course of treatment is twice-a-week for a period of three months.

Function of the clinic

Successful accomplishment of the Clinic’s goals depends in good measure on
cooperation between Clinical Assistants and Social Service Caseworkers. The
Clinic takes this opportunity to acknowledge the extent to which that cooperation exists and functions.

Accomplishment of goals

l7

�THE HOSPITAL

treatment of the mentally ill
depends on intensive research . . . on a better understanding of why people
become mentally ill and a surer knowledge of how treatment effects improvement. Hope for this rests with a wide variety of professional research workers
in the many disciplines concerned with human behavior.
As in any other field of medicine, progress in the

Research and progress

Research in mental illness is spurred on by the grave and immediate need for
new insights and is complicated by the fact that the field of exploration is
limited, almost entirely, to human beings, rather than lower animals. Hillside's
hope is to include every possible approach. Work continues along those lines
that seem to offer the most promise.

Areas of basic study

Psychotherapy remains the area of basic study and treatment. But because past
experience has amply demonstrated that electroshock therapy is, for certain
conditions, the most valuable of the known physical therapies, the hospital has
devoted a major effort this year to study and further elaboration of its use and
effects. Three other studies whose purpose was to devise more clearly objective
methods of evaluating progress in therapy were developed, and a control study
of Chlorpromazine-insulin coma was completed.

Department of
Experimental Psychiatry

This year, the Research Service Was redesignated as the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, indicating its continued growth and anticipating the addition
of a Department of Clinical (Psychodynamic) Research. Two new members were
added to the staff in 1956. Support for the program came from contributions of
the Board of Directors, from the renewal, for three years, of the Electroshock
Study Program of the National Institute of Mental Health of the U. 8. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and from the Kaufman Foundation of
New York.

Departmental research in
Medicine and Biochemistry

Research in the Department of Medicine concentrated chiefly on a study of new
drug therapies. The Department of Biochemistry continued work on studies of
hormonal balance and undertook a study of the relationship between certain
physiological defects and schizophrenia. Funds for the latter were provided by
the National Institutes of Health.

�AND THE COMMUNITY
During the year, increased recognition of the staff and work of the hospital came
from a large number of lay and professional publications. The hospital is keenly
aware of the value of this public interest because greater attention by the general public to the field of mental health will lead to greater support by govern-

Publications and
Presentations

ment and private agencies, foundations and institutions.

Berkowitz, Anne: A Study of the Caseworker’s Function at Hillside Hospital, J.
Hillside Hospital, 5: 56-60, 1956.
Fink, M: Denial of Blindness Following Cerebral Angiography, J. Hillside Hospital, 5: 238-245, 1956.
Fink, M., Kahn, R. L. and Korin, H.: Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function
to Behavioral Change Following Electroshock; Presented at the Divisional Meeting, American Psychiatric Association, Montreal, November 8, 1956.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R. L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following
Electroshock, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 8: 158, 1956.
Goldenberg, H., and Goldenberg, V.: Inhibition of Serum Cholinesterase by
Lysergic Acid Derivatives. Sumicro Detection of LSD, J. Hillside Hospital, 5:

246-257, 1956.
Goldenberg, H.: Decantation as a Precision Step in Colorimetric Analysis, Anal.
Chem., 28: 1003, 1956.
Goldenberg, H.: Recent Advances in Enzyme Methodology; Presented at a Symposium sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Chemists at the
123rd Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science,
New York, December 1956.
Goldenberg, H.: Concerning the Inhibition of Pseudocholinesterase by Hallucinogens; Presented at the New York Academy of Sciences, April 1956.
Green, M. A. and Fink, M.: Electroencephalographic and Clinical Effects of Megimide; Presented at the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, New
York, December 5, 1956.
Green, M. A.: The Use of Electroencephalography in Differentiating Psychogenic
Disorders and Organic Brain Diseases, Amer. J. Psychiat., 113: 27-31, 1956,
(with P. Bergman).
Green, M. A.: Neurological Manifestations of Conversion Hysteria, Trans. A.N.A.,
80: 196-198, 1956.
Jaffe, J.: Experimental Alteration of Communication in Doctor-Patient Relationship; Presented at the Nassau Neuropsychiatric Society, April 15, 1956.
Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy;
Presented at the American Psychopathological Association, New York, June 1,
1956.
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76: 23-29, 1956.
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M. and Korin, H.: Studies of Mode of Action of Electroshock;
Presented at the Nassau Neuropsychiatric Society, April 15, 1956.
Kahn, R. L., Linn, L. and Weinstein, E. A.: Personality Factors Influencing the
Rorschach Responses in Organic Brain Disease; Presented at the New York

19

�Neurological Society, February 14, 1956. Also, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76:
226-267, 1956.
Kahn, R. L., and Pollack, M.: Effects of visual, vestibular and somatosensorimotor deficit on autokinetic perception, J. Exp. Psychol., 52: 398-410, 1956,
(with Battersby, W. S. and Bender, M. B.).
Kahn, R. L.: Patterns of Social Interaction in Brain Disease, Amer. J. Psychiat.,
113: 138-142, 1956, (with E. A. Weinstein).
Kahn, R. L.: Confabulation as a Social Process, Psychiatry, 19: 383-396, 1956,
(with Weinstein, E. A. and Malitz, S.).
Kahn, R. L.: Delusions About Children Following Brain Injury, J. Hillside Hosp.,
5: 290-301, 1956, (with Weinstein, E. A. and Morris, G. 0.).
Korin, H., Fink, M. and Kwalwasser, 8.: Relation of Changes in Memory and
Learning to Improvement in Electroshock, Conf. Neurol. 16: 88-96, 1956.
Lurie, Abraham, Miller, Joseph S. A., Bellak, L., Black, B. F.: Rehabilitation of
the Mentally Ill Through Controlled Transitional Employment, Amer. Orthopsychiatric Assoc., 1955 Annual Meeting. Also, Digest of Neurology and Psychiatry,
July 1956, Institute of Living.
Lurie, Abraham: Book review—Delinquent Boys by Dr. Albert K. Cohen, J. Jewish
Communal Services, Summer 1956.
Lurie, Abraham: Integrating Services for Improved Patient Care; Discussant at
50th Anniversary of Social Service Dept. of Mt. Sinai Hospital, October 18,
1956.
Lurie, Abraham: Identifying Casework Responsibility in a Multi-Discipline Health
Setting; Workshop Chairman, National Conference of Jewish Communal Service,
1956.
Pinsky, Louise: The Impact of Mental Illness on a Patient’s Family, Jewish Communal Service, Spring 1956.
Pollack, M. and Kahn, R. L.: Unilateral “Spatial Agnosia” (“lnattention”), Brain,
79: 68-93, 1956, (with Battersby, W. S. and Bender, M. B.).
Wachspress, M., Blumberg, A. G., Fink, M. and Miller, Joseph S. A.: Evaluation
of High-Dose Reserpine Therapy for the Relief of Anxiety, J. Hillside Hospital,
5: 67-77, 1956.
Zierer, Ernest and Zierer, Edith: Dynamics of Creative Therapy; Presented at the
University Clinic in Tubingen, Neckar, Germany.
Zierer, Ernest and Zierer, Edith: Structure and Utilization of Creative Therapy;
Presented at the Institute of Psychotherapy and Depth Psychology in Stuttgart,
Germany.
Zierer, Ernest and Zierer, Edith: Non Artistic Creative Activity; Presented at the
Art Academy of Stuttgart, Germany.
Zierer, Ernest and Zierer, Edith: Seminar on Creative Therapy as applied at
Hillside Hospital and Extramurally; Presented at the meetings of the Zierer
Study Group in Stuttgart, Germany.
Zierer, Ernest and Zierer, Edith: What is Creative Therapw Presented at the
broadcast over the Suddeutscher Rundflunk “Millelwelle.”
Zierer, Ernest: Dynamics of Creative Therapy; Presented at the National Psychological Institute for Psychoanalysis, New York.
Zierer, Ernest and Zierer, Edith: Structure and Therapeutic Utilization of Creative Activity, Amer. J. Psychotherapy, 10: 481-520, July 1956.
'

‘

20

�TEACHING AND TRAINING
The Resident Training Program at Hillside continues to emphasize the interrelation between the training program and the treatment program. Each resident
carries a case load of about 15 patients under the supervision of staff and
visiting instructors, and attends lecture conferences conducted by the medical
directors. Lecture seminars in the fields of psychopathology and psychotherapy,
and reading seminars, are conducted by special instructors chosen from the
hospital staff. Qualified residents are assigned to the department of Experimental Psychiatry for clinical and other psychiatrical research projects. During
the year there were 18 residents in training.

The Resident Training
Program

The hospital training program extends also to Clinical Assistants in the Outpatient and After-care clinics and on-the-job training of personnel. Regular lec-

Training for other
staff members

The Sunday Clinical Conferences, open to and attended by psychiatrists and
other professional personnel and by outstanding visiting physicians, are part of
the resident training program and are based on cases prepared by the residents.
They continue to make a significant contribution to the training picture on the
New York Psychiatric scene.

Sunday Clinical Conferences

The Annual Israel Strauss Lecture, established in 1955 in honor of Hillside’s
founder and late president, was delivered this year on April 8th. The speaker
was William Malamud, MD, Professor and Chairman of the Department of
Psychiatry and Neurology of the Boston University of School of Medicine. His

Israel Strauss Lecture

Hillside's Committee on Community Education continues active and its program
of lectures to the laity promote interest and understanding of mental hygiene
problems in the community.

Community Education

The Medical Library, considerably enlarged by the acquisition of the entire medical library of the late Dr. Israel Strauss, was able this year to increase its services and usefulness to the staff by the employment of a full-time librarian.

Medical Library

The Journal of the Hillside Hospital again showed an increase in the number
of its subscribers, an indication of the prestige and general acceptance it enjoys.
A 504 page Israel Strauss Memorial Volume containing articles by psychiatrists
and other friends of Dr. Strauss, was published in 1956.

Journal of the

tures and conferences are scheduled for nurses and attendants, social workers,
members of the various adjunctive services and for affiliating students from
other educational institutions.

subject was “Current trends in basic psychiatric research.”

Hillside Hospital

21

�REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
Deficits

While the cost of running the Hospital increased again, from $1,175,635 to

$1,326,454, the deficit this year has been substantially reduced because the
City of New York increased its contribution toward the care of the indigent
mentally ill from $14 to $16 a day.
The average number of patients per day. 192, remained the same as last year
—97% of capacity. However the length of stay increased somewhat and the
total number of patients treated was 561 this year compared to 575 in 1955.

Comparison of costs:
1955-1956 . . .

Salaries
Food

.

.

.

.

Maintenance and Grounds
Administrative EXpenses
Medical Supplies .
Repairs and Replacements
Clinics .

.
.

.
.

Total
Total No. Patients
Total Patient Days

.

.

.

.

Average income per patient day
Average cost per patient day
Average loss per patient per day

.

.

.

.

.

.

1955

1956

$732,977
106,397
50,551
67,017
28,130
25,279
165,284

$797,805
113,428
59,436
82,608
23,950
35,105
214,122

$1,175,635

$1,326,454

575
69,903

561

70,189

$14.45
$15.34

$15.44
$15.84

$

.89

$

.40

Costs of expanded
out-patient services

should be noted that the largest portion of the $150,819 increase was used
for expansion of the Out-patient service. This increase was entirely offset by
grants from the New York City Community Mental Health Board, the State
Mental Health Authority, and increased subvensions from the Federation of
Jewish Philanthropies. Increases in salaries reflect a rise in salaries and salary
rates rather than an increase in personnel. Other increases reflect the general
pattern of rising costs for goods and services.

Costs of the Israel Strauss
Adolescent Pavilion

1956 it was decided to compute the costs of running the Israel Strauss
Adolescent Pavilion separately from those of the main hospital. While the
pavilion operates as an integral part of the hospital, it is a new and costly
experiment, which, if included, somewhat distorts the general operating picture.

It

In

The operation of the Adolescent Pavilion showed a deficitof $37,752, an
increase of 13% over 1955. The difference is entirely accounted for by salaries
for additional personnel found necessary for successful operation.
Maurice Bachrach

22

�SOCIETY OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
‘President

. . .

Alvin E. Coleman

*Chairman of the Board Roy Foster
*Honorary Chairman of the Board Leon Lowenstein
*Vice-President Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.
*Vice-President D. Herbert Beskind
‘Vice-President George W. Galinger

Manuel Lee Robbins
+Treasurer Alfred Levinger
‘Ass’t Treasurer Arnold S. Askin
Ass’t Secretary Hilda Strauss
Assistant Secretary Alfred Appel

'Secretary

Board of Directors
A.

Leon Lowenstein“

Roy Foster"

Jacob Abrams

George W. Galinger‘
Arthur Garson
Maurice Glinertt
Mrs. Henry Goldman, Jr.
Meyer Goldstein
Louis A. Green
M. Victor Leventritt
Alfred Levinger?
Morris L. Levinsonrl:
Milton B. Loeb
Sandor Lorand, M.D.

Alfred Appel
Arnold S. Askin“

John M. Bendheim
D. Herbert Beskind‘
Saul Blickman
Alvin E. Coleman
Morris David
Edwin Elson1~

Thomas Epstein
Arthur C. Fatt‘
David Finkle
David Finn:

Charles H. Meyer“
Arthur Murray
Manuel Lee Robbins”
lrving Rosenbaum
S. H. Scheuer“
Walter Scheuer
Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.‘
Harry Silverson
Hilda Strauss
Nathan Wigod
Morton 8. Wolf
Walter D. Yankauer

Chairmen of Standing Committees
Medical Affairs Committee
D. Herbert Beskind

Executive Committee
Roy Foster

House and Grounds Committee
George W. Galinger
Co-Chairmen
Nathan Wigod

Jewish Hospital
Coleman

Liaison Committee—L.
Alvin E.

I.

Legal Committee
Charles H. Meyer

Publicity Committee
Arthur C. Fatt

Finance Committee
Arnold S. Askin
Social Service Committee
Hilda Strauss

Personnel Committee
Meyer Goldstein

‘Executive Committee Members

tDeceased in 1956
*Elected in 1956

23

�PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
Medical Director
Joseph S. A. Miller, MD.

Associate Medical Director
Simon Kwalwasser, M.D.

Administrator, Maurice Bachrach, B.S.
George Yessin, M.D.
Jack H. Tabor, M.D.

Supervising Psychiatrists
Gerhard Schauer, M.D.
Martin A. Green, M.D.

Robert Navarre, M.D.
Eugene Glynn, M.D.

Supervising Psychiatrist
Israel Strauss Adolescent Pavilion
Alice Slater Stahl, MD.
Director of Out-Patient Services
Robert R. Luttrell, MD.
Director of Research in Experimental Psychiatry
Maximilian Fink, M.D.

Internist, Arnold Blumberg, MD.
Director of Laboratories, Harry Goldenberg, Ph.D.

Resident Staff
Ruth Adams, M.D.*
Stanley Brodsky, M.D.
Frederick Coleman, M.D.
Warren Cox, M.D.
Ilhan Ermutlu, M.D.
Harold Esecover, M.D.

Stefano Fajrajzen, M.D.
Marie Friedman, MD.
Stanley M. Friedman, MD.
Ruth Fuchs, M.D.

Harold Galef, MD.
Robert S. Gilbert, M.D.
Eugene D. Glynn, M.D.“
Victor Goldin, MD.
Michael Gould, MD.
David N. Graubert, M.D.*
George E. Gross, M.D.*
Peter Guggenheim, M.D.+
A. Russell Lee, MD.

Joel Markowitz, M.D.*
Robert Nodine, MD.
Paul Pressman, M.D.
Arthur Root, M.D.
Jack R. Royce, M.D.*
Robert Shaw, M.D.*
Charles G. Silverman, M.D.*
Myron Stein, M.D.
Morton Wachspress, M.D.

Leon Lefer, M.D.

Other Professional St aff Heads
Nathalie Burbach, R.N., M.A. Director of Nursing
Abraham Lurie, M.S.S.W. Director of Social Service
Abraham Levine, Ph.D. Director of Psychology
Ernest Zierer, Ph.D. Director of Creative Therapy
Eileen P. Fisher, B.S. Director of Occupational Therapy
Zetta Putter, M.S. Director of Group Activities
Angelina Canavan, B.A. Dietician

Department Heads
Dorothy Croghan Accounting Supervisor
Lillian Dailey Office Manager
Thomas R. Lumley Superintendent of Buildings &amp; Grounds
Sarah Travers Executive Housekeeper
‘Completed residency in 1956
fin military service

24

�MEDICAL BOARD
*President
*Vice-President

‘Secretary

. . .

M. David

Sidney Tarachow, M.D.

Sidney

L.

Green, M.D.

Epstein, M.D.

*Treasurer
*

Ex-President

David Warshaw, M.D.

Samuel Atkin, M.D.

Psychiatrists
Samuel Atkin, M.D.‘
Arnold Eisendorfer, MD.
M. David Epstein, M.D.“
Margaret E. Fries, M.D.*
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.
George S. Goldman, M.D.
Sidney L. Green, M.D.‘

William Karliner, M.D.
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.

Sarah R. Kelman, MD.
Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Sidney Klein, M.D.“
Samuel 2. Orgel, M.D.
H. L. Rachlin, M.D.“

Lawrence J. Roose, M.D.
Irving J. Sands, MD.
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.*
Martin Schreiber, M.D.
l’sidor Silbermann, M.D.*
Otto Sperling, M.D.
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.‘

Non-Psychiatrists
Director of Department of Medicine
Lester Cohen, MD.

'Director of Department of Surgery

Director of Department of Neurology
Morris B. Bender, M.D.

Director of Department of Gynecology
Julius Jarcho, MD.

‘Department of Dentistry

David Warshaw, MD.

Paul Scheman, D.D.S.

Chairmen of Standing Committees
Adolescent Pavilion
Sidney L. Green, M.D.

Education of Resident Staff
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.

Community Education and Public Relations
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.

Group Psychotherapy
Samuel 2. Orgel, M.D.

Credentials Committee for Psychiatric
Staff and Promotions
Martin Schreiber, M.D.

Manhattan After-Care Clinic
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.

Credentials Committee for Non-Psychiatric
Staff and Promotions
David Warshaw, M.D.

Credentials Committee for Resident Staff
Sidney Klein, M.D.

Queens Out-Patient Clinic
William Karliner, M.D.
Research Committee
Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.
Publications Committee
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.

Journal Sub-Committee
Sidney Tarachow, MD.
'Ex-officio

25

�CONSULTING, ATTENDING AND
VISITING STAFFS: AND CLINICAL ASSISTANTS
Consultants
Psychiatry
Leonard Blumgart, M.D.
Sandor Lorand, M.D.
Nathaniel S. Selby, M.D.
Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.
A. M.

Rabiner, M.D.

Medicine
Alfred Angrist, M.D.
Morris S. Bender, M.D.
Oscar Levin, MD.
I. Jesse Levy, MD.

Neurology
Hans Strauss, M.D.

I.

S. Wechsler, M.D.

Dentistry
Morris Fierstein, D.D.S.

Attending Psychiatrists
Samuel Atkin, M.D.
Arnold Eisendorfer, MD.
M. David Epstein, M.D.
Margaret E. Fries, MD.
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.
George S. Goldman, M.D.
Sidney L. Green, MD.

William Karliner, M.D.
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.
Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Sidney Klein, M.D.
Samuel 2. Orgel, M.D.

Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.
Lawrence J. Roose, MD.

Robert A. Savitt, M.D.
Martin Schreiber, M.D.
lsidor Silbermann, M.D.
Otto Sperling, M.D.
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.

Associate Attending Psychiatrists
Frank Berchenko, M.D.
Cornelius Beukenkamp, M.D.
Mark L. Gerstle, Jr.+

Soll Goodman, M.D.
Attilio Laguardia, M.D.

Samuel R. Lehrman, M.D.
Abraham S. Lenzner, M.D.
Martin H. Orens, M.D.

Abraham Kaplan, M.D.
Louis Kaywin, M.D.
Bruce Kendall, M.D.
George P. Krupp, M.D.
Peter Laderman, M.D.
Nathaniel S. Lehrman, M.D.
Harold S. Leopold, MD.

William W. Pike, M.D.

Adjunct Attending Psychiatrists
Edward R. Adelson, M.D.
Renato J. Almansi, M.D.
Herman S. Alpert, M.D.
Irving L. Bauer, M.D.
Milton M. Berger, M.D.

Lionel H. Blackman, M.D.
Isadore H. Cohn, M.D.

Alexander J. Friedman, MD.
Albert E. Goldbert, M.D.
Albert Harrison, MD.
Thomas Hora, M.D.
tResigned in 1956

26

David Milrod, M.D.
Hugh Mullan, M.D.

Helene Papanek, MD.

Benjamin B. Rubenstein, M.D.+
Irvin Salan, M.D.
Frederick F. Shevin, M.D.
Jay Stanton, M.D.
Aaron Stein, M.D.
Samuel Tabbat, M.D.
Fred U. Tate, M.D.
Leonard Weinroth, M.D.
Herbert Wieder, M.D.
Arthur Zitrin, M.D.1-

�Visiting
Director Lester Cohen, MD.
Visiting Physician George Sabrin, M.D.
Visiting Physician L. Rosenblum, M.D.
Visiting Physician A. Blumberg, MD.
Associate Physician M. Kalkstein, M.D.
Associate Physician J. Weinstein, M.D.
Visiting Neurologist

Medicine
Adjunct Physician A. L. Berger, M.D.
Adjunct Physician W. B. Brett, M.D.
Visiting Dermatologist C. Stritzler, M.D.
Associate Dermatologist Joel Schweig, MD.
Adjunct Dermatologist N. Goldfarb, MD.
Neurology

Morris B. Bender, MD.
Associate Neurologist
Adjunct Neurologist Harry Harter, M.D.

Director David Warshaw, MD.
Visiting Surgeon Sidney Hirsch, M.D.
Visiting Neurosurgeon Joseph Siris, M.D.
Visiting Urologist L. G. Goldberg, MD.
Adjunct Urologist Albert Sutton, M.D.
Visiting Orthopedist A. H. Lewert, M.D.
Director Julius Jarcho, MD.
Visiting Gynecologist M. Warner, MD.
Visiting Gynecologist H. Dubrow, M.D.

Surgery

Kurt Adler, M.D.

Associate Orthopedist J. Schneiderman, M.D.
Visiting Proctologist B. Warner, M.D.
Visiting Ophthalmologist E. Seretan, M.D.
Associate Ophthalmologist A. Minsky, M.D.
Visiting Otolaryngologist S. Clayton, M.D.
Visiting Anesthesiologist Georges Bean, M.D.

Gynecology
Associate Gynecologist Jack Cohen, MD.
Associate Gynecologist B. Greenblat, M.D.
Adjunct Gynecologist Eugene Streim, M.D.

Radiology
Visiting Radiologist Bernard Epstein, M.D.

Director Paul Scheman, D.D.S.
Associate Director J. G. Rubin, D.D.S.
Associate Stanley Spiro, D.D.S.
Associate Dentist B. Schwaid, D.D.S.
Adjunct Dentist B. Lebow, D.D.S.
Adjunct Dentist H. Lewis, D.D.S.

Dentistry
Adjunct
Adjunct
Adjunct
Adjunct
Adjunct
Adjunct

Dentist
Dentist
Dentist
Dentist
Dentist
Dentist

H. Adler, D.D.S.

J. Goldberg, D.D.S.
S. Platt, D.D.S.
S. Plotnick, D.D.S.
E. Friedman, D.D.S.
M. Protell, D.D.S.

Optometry
Staff Optometrist Edward L. Steinberg, O'.D.
Podiatry
Staff Podiatrist Sam Sokolov, Pod.

D.

27

�Clinical Assistants in Manhattan and Queens Clinics
_

Lester I. Abend, ‘M.D.
Ruth Adams, M.D.
Romano Antonelli, M.D.
Howard Boskey, MD.
Paul Bradlow, M.D.
Arline Caldwell, M.D.
Mischa Caplan, M.D.
Dominick J. Carlisi, M.D.
Lionel Chertoff, M.D.
Rita M. Chalef, M.D.
Gloria Chung, MD.
Julius Colantuond, M.D.
Fred Dalton, M.D.
Edward Einhorn, M.D.1-

Joseph Feldman, M.D.+
Philip Friedland, M.D.t

Hans Freymuth, M.D.1Arthur Gillman, M.D.t
Harry Gonda, MD.
David Graubert, M.D.
Martin Hurvitz, M.D.
Howard Hess, M.D.
Gunthar Jacob, M.D.
Wilbur Jarvis, M.D.
Buck Luria, M.D.
Meyer Monchek, M.D.
Mathias Nachumi, M.D.1-

Beatrice Nachtigal, M.D.
Iris Orens, M.D.
Edward Pinney, Jr., MD.
Joshua Ramot, M.D.
Willem W. Roosen, M.D.
Henry Rosberger, M.D.
Joseph D. Rosen, M.D.
Gabriel Rubin, MD.
Herman Tannor, M.D.
Leon Tec, M.D.
Clara Torda, M.D.
Morton Wachspress, M.D.
Irving Waitzel, M.D.l‘

tResigned 1956

STSANDL
.

are necessary to a

v

TO THE HOSPITAL
he Society. The following form, however,

se of the Hillside Hospital, the sum of
-

rty, such as bonds, stocks, etcetera,

is

serted instead of the words “the sum of

28

�l

.,v

.

I
'

I

.,

‘

,-

.

.

�Glen Oaks, Queens, New York,

�Hillside Hospital is a non-proﬁt, non-sectarian mental hospital for the treatment of

from
Patients
mental
curable
and
are
early
symptoms.
voluntary patients suffering
admitted regardless of their ability to pay.

I

Hillside provides training for physi-

cians in post-graduate psychiatry and psychotherapy and puts major emphasis on
research in all phases of treatment. The hospital considers itself a pilot institution,
ill.
the
to
the
and
human
mentally
in
efﬁcacious application of psychiatry
pioneering

I

The hospital is licensed in the New York State Department

It

is approved

of Mental Hygiene.

Medical
Council
the
in
on
by
psychiatry
for a two-year residency

Education of the American Medical Association, The American Board of Psychiatry

and Neurology and the American College of Surgeons. The Dental Department is
Association
Dental
American
the
as an approved hospital department.
by
certiﬁed

I

Hillside Hospital is an afﬁliate of the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies and a

York
Fund.
New
Greater
the
and
Fund
United
the
Hospital
participant of

M. DAVID EPSTEIN, M.D.

�I

The responsibilities and functions of the Medical
Board fall roughly into two broad categories: 1. It is a
consultative and advisory body to the Medical Director
and the Board of Directors in all matters pertaining to
medical functioning of the Hospital. In this capacity, it
assists materially in the formulation of basic policy,
and in the establishment of both short-range and long2. In addition, it
range plans, directions and goals
performs duties relative to the implementation of these
plans and policies and plays an active role in the practical day-to-day operations and needs of the hospital,
whether this be in terms of active supervision of the
junior members of the staff, supervision of the Out
Patient Clinic or the After-Care Clinic, careful and methodical screening of all candidates for positions on the
professional staff, either House or Visiting, or working
with other departments within the hospital, such as Psychology or Social Work It is not possible to report on
all the activities of the Medical Board since the last
report was rendered. However, some of the more important areas of Board activity are worthy of individual
mention During the past year, the Liaison Committee
of the Medical Board, working with the Medical Director
and Lay Board, has been able, after long and delicate negotiations, to bring to a successful culmination
the question of the establishment of a Psychiatric Service at our neighbor institution, the Long Island Jewish
Hospital. One of Hillside’s Attending Psychiatrists will
organize a staff at Long Island Jewish Hospital and will
maintain liaison with Hillside Hospital. We will be glad
to continue to render whatever assistance we can, and
we look forward to a productive, progressive collaboration between the two institutions The Journal of the
Hillside Hospital, under its able editor, has continued to
grow and is achieving ever wider recognition in the
professional world. The caliber and standards of the
publication have remained consistently high. In the ﬁeld
of publication a new project has been recommended and
will shortly be carried out, viz. a series of monographs

I

I

I

I

on important psychiatric subjects to be issued under the
The Adolescent
imprimatur of Hillside Hospital

I

Pavilion, a pilot project established several years ago,
and a rather unique undertaking, has taken a great deal
of time and work. It has gone through a variety of growing pains in its early exploratory and experimental
period, but it is now an established and important aspect
of the Board’s interest and efforts. Although it continues
to present problems, or better, because it does, much
is being learned about problems of adolescent psychopathology and their treatment and a sizable body of
knowledge is being accumulated which will no doubt
lead to advances in understanding and to important research results. In addition, the Pavilion continues to
After much
serve as an important training facility
careful study and planning, the Medical Board has set
the machinery in motion to establish a new project. This
is to be a Child Therapy Unit, for the intensive treatment
of a selected group of children and their parents where
necessary, to be operated as part of the Out Patient Department. Such a unit would be a most valuable adjunct
to our training program and will also help in ﬁlling an
urgent need in the community. The basic set-up is ready
to start functioning as soon as one or two remaining
obstacles are overcome, and it is ardently hoped that this
plan will be brought to fruition in the very near future
Possibly two of the most important functions of the
Medical Board are the organization and supervision of
the Educational and Research Divisions of the Hospital.
Under the guiding hand of the Educational Committee,
our Resident Training Program continues to operate
most successfully and the program of formal and didactic training and supervision is more than adequate. The
Committee is constantly studying and re-evaluating the
educational program, always seeking ways and means
of reﬁning and improving teaching methods at the Resident level, a universal problem with which every training hospital has to cope. Currently, the Committee is
exploring ways of expanding and rounding out the train-

I

I

ing program, with a View to having Hillside accredited
for a three-year residency, possibly with the aid of affiliations with other institutions. Such a development would
be eminently desirable
In the area of Research, much
has been accomplished and the Committee or the Board
charged with this responsibility has functioned most
actively. In collaboration with the Directors of the various research divisions, a large number of projects have
been studied and evaluated. In addition, several members of the Board and Attending staff are engaged in
individual research projects of great interest and promise. The Board is still seeking ways of expanding the
Research Program, broadening it to make it more inclusive and comprehensive by adding a Research Division
devoted to the more purely psychological aspects of
mental disorders. Unfortunately, our efforts thus far
have not been successful, but the search for a suitable
and available person to head such a program goes on
actively. It is with profound regret that we are compelled
to note the loss through retirement of two of our oldest
and most respected Board members— Doctors Julius
Jarcho and David Warshaw, both of whom have become
Consultant Physicians, from which lofty eminence we
trust their invaluable advice and experience will continue to be available to us A closing word now about
our view of the future. We have no doubt that Hillside
Hospital now stands at a critical point in its historical
development and evolution.Great and important changes
can be expected and far-reaching decisions will have to
be made. These changes are made necessary by the need
to expand and to be prepared to meet the exigencies of
a rapidly expanding science of Psychiatry and even
more rapidly growing community needs for service and
for trained personnel. We must gear ourselves and plan
with foresight for these changes. Hillside can and should
become a vital element in the psychiatric world and an
important training and research center. To make it such
will require Vision, courage, perhaps even daring, and
cooperation on the part of all who are associated with it.

I

I

�//2

I

TQM/r/M'
e/0 poéra/

In 1957, Hillside saw many changes, some obvious,
some not yet evaluated, in attitude and treatment, in
ﬁnancial status, in acceptance in the eyes of the comI
of
am
constructive
these
For
signs
progress,
munity
happy to commend our staff, the professional and nonprofesslonal personnel, the Medical Board and the everready help and unselﬁsh interests of the Board of DirecAs a non-proﬁt, non-sectarian hospital for the
tors
treatment of voluntary patients suffering from early and
curable mental symptoms, the function of Hillside as a
teaching and research center has enabled it to pioneer
in many forms of therapy. To help in this area, an unusual number of grants were awarded to Hillside in 1957.
Some $256,400 were allocated for research and nonthe
contributions
Of
the
making
up
operating purposes.
grants, the largest was $104,800 from The Ford Foundation. Other sums were: Max Einhorn Estate, $50,000,
Hillside Hospital Board of Directors, $50,000, and the
US. Public Health, Institute of Mental Health, $35,000
Increasing attention from the nation’s press is being
focused on the research, training and therapy programs
of leading mental hospitals. We believe this is of great
help to everyone in the ﬁeld of mental health. No small
share of this publicity was directed at Hillside Hospital
during 1957 However successful this side of Hillside’s
remained
still
the
in
on
1957,
emphasis
was
program
the patient. At Hillside, the ﬁrst person a patient sees

I

I

I

I

is his doctor. The large medical staff is concerned with
various aspects of his recovery, but the doctor assigned
to each patient is the most important person to look to
for treatment, consultation, advice and help. The social
worker assigned to help with the problems of the

patient outside the hospital, as well as within its walls,
stays with him as long as needed. The nurses and
attendants offer to the patient the understanding of
A new
special training and constant association
booklet dealing with these aspects of a patient’s relationship with the staff, and endeavoring to answer his
questions and allay his doubts, has been written and
made available to patients and their doctors, as well
In 1957,
as consultants and interested researchers
the three alternate ways of dealing with Hillside’s
patients and their varied needs evolved more strongly.
A patient is helped to rejoin his family and the community not only by Hillside but by the various private
and state employment groups, interested voluntary
organizations, as well as the family which ideally gained
new insight and understanding under the guidance of
the social service worker He may need the continued
attention of a social service worker, sometimes for as
long as eight months. A continuous relationship such as
this gives anchorage and stability to the patient. Should
further psychotherapy be needed, he is referred to the
After-Care Clinic, the Jewish Family Service, or other

I

I

I

I

When the discharged patient cannot
be sent back home, because the original environment is
not suitable to maintaining recovery he is placed in
private residence care through our liaison with the
Jewish COmmunity Services of Long Island. Happily
settled in newer, more sympathetic surrounding, the
patient then can be seen in therapy for six to eight
months. This time limit is arbitrarily set in the belief
that the patient can be moved to a dynamic effort to
With the entire emphasis of
recover more quickly
Hillside on an “open hospital,” the tendency more and
more is to treat and hold the patient so far as possible
in his normal environment. Carrying this a step further,
Hillside now believes that its future lies not in enlarging
the hospital’s facilities, but in expanding the pré-hospital
The main orienguidance, and Out Patient Service
tation, therefore, of the patients and staff at Hillside
is to the inevitable return to the community and useful
citizenship. The goal of the hospital’s treatment services.

organizations

I

I

both at the in patient and out patient levels, is to provide
the best qualitative treatment for our patients, so that the
result, ideally, is not merely an improved or recovered
individual, but an improved or reclaimed family unit
or small segment of the present and future community.
Joseph S. A. Miller, M.D.

�I 1957 was a good year for Hillside Hospital, and no

apparent recession set in, with regard to the work of the
hospital, or the demands made upon it were concerned.
During the year, new ideas were presented and developed, such as the training of registered nurses in psychiatry at Hillside, in collaboration with the Queens
Medical College. This plan inured to the beneﬁt of the
hospital in that some of the nurses remained to practice
with us. Additional funds secured from the New York
City Community Mental Health Board and the Nassau
County Mental Health Board permitted the further expansion of services in the Out Patient Clinic where, at
the end of 1957, we were treating 205 patients each
week
We suffered a great loss through the death of
our long time Treasurer, Alfred Levinger, who had been
one of the original founders of the institution. During
1957, the Board of Directors created the new position
of Honorary Director, and the first Director so honored
was Mrs. Israel Strauss, the wife of the founder of our
institution. Saul Blickman, one of our directors ‘of long
One of the most
standing, was similarly honored
important events of the year was the appointment of
Dr. Lewis L. Robbins as Director of Professional Siervices. Dr. Robbins, a nationally known psychiatrist, who
has been with the Menninger Foundation for 18 years,
will join the Hillside staff in July 1958 Our research
work has continued and expanded through the ﬁnancial
aid of several government organizations and private

I

I

I

ﬂﬂﬂﬂﬂ/ﬂ

'

foundations, as well as donations of the Hillside Board
of Directors. During 1957, the staff of the Department
of Experimental Psychiatry extended our knowledge
of the way various treatments affect our patients and
have clariﬁed our understanding of electroshock, insulin
coma, and the newer tranquilizers. Their studies have
been presented before national and local psychiatric
and psychologic societies, and eight reports have been
published during the year. Three reports were presented
at the International Congress of Psychiatry in Zurich
and of Psychology in Brussels during the summer The
need for greater research efforts is apparent to all who
are even casually interested in this ﬁeld of health, and
it does seem incumbent upon the governments of the
United States and of each state, as well as private funds,
to offer more generous support for these efforts. But
surely, within the foreseeable future, progress will be
made and we, at Hillside, are not alone in believing
this. At the 1957 convention of the American Hospital
Association, Dr. Julian P. Price, Chairman of the Joint
Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals of the American Medical Association said: “The chemical nature of
certain mental diseases will be discovered and their
control brought about through the giving of drugs.”
RecognizingIthe tremendous human values this will
have, not to mention the enormous dollar savings, let us
try our best to hasten this day with our own efforts
and money.

I

ALVIN E. COLEMAN

�of
545
total
treated
patients.
Hillside
a
1957,
Admissions and Discharges—1n
with an average daily census of 192. New admissions totalled 81 and readmissions
after
been
an
had
discharged
351
of
the
end
patients
the
32.
totalled
By
year,
of
summaries
statistical
the
is
similar
to
data
This
average stay of 182 days.

recent years.

%/tm/

/
MARRIED
F

No. of patients treated

Males
Sex
Females

Admission (13-19
(20-29
Age
(30-39

(40-49
(50-59
(60 plus
No. of patients admitted
Average no. days hospitalized (adults)

WIDOWED
M

F

DIVORCED &amp; SEPARATED
M

F

�I

In any evaluation of discharges, it is important to
realize that the terms used to denote mental condition
at the time of discharge only signify a comparison between the patient’s condition and behavior when he came
to the hospital and when he left, a relatively short period
The following comparisons use terms which are
deﬁned as follows. Unimproved means there has been

I

no change; improved means that symptoms or problems
have been somewhat helped but still persist to an appre-

ciable extent; much improved means that symptoms
have disappeared and the patient seemed in good condition at the hospital, but there is no certainty Of how
he will function when he gets back into his own social
and working community; recovered means that in
addition to what has been said for much improved,
there is reasonable expectation that the patient will be
able to return tO his community and function as well,
or better than he did before he became ill.

%/
,

DIAGNOSIS

ADULTS

ADOLESCENTS

/lﬂﬂ//

a)
a

TOTAL
NO. OF
PATIENTS

WHOLE

SHOCK
THERAPY

5'2

0F

INSULIN
COMA
THERAPY

%
%
RECOVERED

MUCH
IMPROVED

IMPROVED

UNIMPROVED

Psychoneurosis

63

3

66

19%

12%

10%

46%

40%

4%

Manic depressive psychosis

84

1

85

24‘}

34%

27%

43%

27%

3%

Involutional psychosis

63

63

18%

39%

22%

49%

20%

9%

1

8%

26%

50%

16%

40%

20%

40%

39%

36%

12%

118

9

127

36‘)?

Others

8

2

10

3%

Totals

336

15

351

100%

Schizophrenia

%

76%

14%

18%

13%

�%y¢%/%¢Q/%

m/

giwzéw
%%éa/

I

One of the main criteria for accepting. patients at Hillside is their ability to
participate proﬁtably in psychotherapy. Patients are seen individually three
times a week for psychoanalytically oriented treatment by their assigned
psychiatrists. The psychiatrist is the leader of the hospital “team” that plans
and supervises the patient’s day-to-day treatment. The other members of the

team are a psychiatric social worker, a psychologist, professional representatives of the adjunctive services—Occupational Therapy, Group Activities and
At Hillside, the staff is
Creative Therapy—and the Nursing Department
much larger in proportion to the number of patients than in other mental
hospitals. Thus, Hillside’s emphasis is entirely on the patient as an individual.
Although all the latest physical and pharmaceutical techniques are used as
needed, such as electroshock, insulin, Serpasil, treatment does not revolve
the
to
since
these
supplementary
around
only
they
techniques
are
primarily
psychotherapeutic approach. All departments bring into play the tools of
treatment, prescribed according to the patient’s particular needs, and all aimed
not only at relieving him of symptoms, but getting at the causes as well, so
that he may be returned to full usefulness as a human being.
The Psychology Department. under the direction of Dr. Abraham Levine,
continued to expand both in staff and services. In addition to six new staff
Uma
Dr.
for
Hillside
training
a
diagnostic
year’s
provided
appointments,
The Vocational CounselChowdhury, a cultural anthropologist from India
ling Program was expanded through the addition of staff members. The Department conducted 222 new adult patient examinations, 21 examinations for the
adolescent patients and 248 Out Patient examinations. 117 psychological

I

I

discharge examinations were
administered for In Patient
adults, 8 for adolescents, and
19 for Out Patients.
The Nursing Department. under the direction of Mrs. Nathalie Burbach,
participated in all initial presentations, discharge conferences and team meetings, enabling them to offer more understanding and knowledgeable nursing
care. 36 Psychiatric Aides were trained, and 57 student nurses from Queens
College received psychiatric nursing experience. Central Islip School of Nursing continued to send student nurses for semi-weekly visits to compare opera‘
tion of state and private hospitals, and student nurses and nursing personnel
from St. Vincent’s Psychiatric Unit in Manhattan Visited to obtain information
generally helpful in the preparation of patients transferring from St. Vincent’s
The Intramural Clinic has continued to handle all major
to Hillside
An
of
hospitalization.
patients’
the
during
course
arising
physical problems
overall supervision of the effect of the drugs used in psychotherapy was conducted with special emphasis on Chlorpromazine and Meprobamate. 1756
examinations were conducted for treatment
in such specialized ﬁelds as Dermatology,
Gynecology, Medicine, Neurology, Ophthalmology, Orthopedics, Otolaryngology, Podiatry, Proctology, Radiology, Surgery and
The Dental Department made
Urology
1123 examinations including restorations,

I

I

�extractions, prosthetic treatments, and X-rays. Under the direction of Dr. Paul
Scheman, a staff of 12 Visiting dentists continued to adapt consultation and
treatment procedures to the special needs of the mental patient. The department,
certiﬁed by the American Dental Association, presented a series of lectures for
dentists who treat “problem patients”.

tMa/QMM/féze

gar/12w

The Occupational Therapy Department. under the direction of Eileen P.
Fisher, in order to give more intense individual treatment, registered no more
than 45 patients at a session. No therapist has more than twelve patients to
work with at a time. Though the Department treated fewer patients
per month,
the average daily attendance remained the same, since there was closer followa
up on all patients and a closer relationship with individual doctors. The Department works closely with all members of the psychiatric team, particularly the
social workers. A special class program was organized on a selective basis,
offering individual instruction in ceramics, jewelry and sewing. A student
training program is being planned as a result of approval as an alﬁliating
center for students from New York University
Lectures on the principles
and uses of Occupational Therapy in a psychiatric hospital were given to
student nurses, new personnel and visitors.

I

The Creative Therapy Department. under the direction of Dr. Ernest
Zierer and his associate, Mrs. Edith Zierer, continued experiments with con-

trolled painting tests, designed as a psychodiagnostic tool to stimulate the
patient into projecting his unconscious conﬂicts by painting. An
average of 42
patients were treated daily. A total of 4,509 paintings were analyzed and a
total of 1,593 tests administered A new questionnaire form of tests
was added
to help the patient gain insight into his actions and reactions. The
patients
are encouraged in regularly scheduled individual sessions to give verbal
interpretations of their paintings within the framework of the situation, also
tied in with the test results
Lectures were given to visiting psychiatrists,
social workers and students.

I

I

�@ﬁéﬂ/ [lﬂﬂ/
ﬂ

@ammmw/ /

�I Hillside Hospital believes in treating the mental

patient within the community, rather than in
isolation, away from family and familiar surroundings. Directly responsible for improving
communications between the patient, his family
and his community is Hillside’s Department of
Social Services. Under the direction of
Abraham Lurie, the Department works to help the
patient keep his place in society, and return to it
In 1957, the Dea better, more useful citizen
partment was reorganized to include the Group
Work Division. The Department, therefore, now
consists of two divisions: The Casework Division,
directed by Louise Pinsky, an assistant director
of the Department, and the Group Work Division,
directed by Arnold Eisen, also an assistant director of the Department As a result of this merger
of staffs, there have been several improvements
and developments in the program offered patients,
and it is believed that the goal of integrating the
patient with his family and the community is
closer through these changes.
The Casework Division. with the knowing cooperation of the patients and their families, works
to maintain and strengthen family ties, and to

I

I

solve, with the patients, their individual problems
of rehabilitation. Through the Division, the hospi-

tal reaches out from the patient to the family to
the community. This link is established and maintained before the patient enters Hillside and continues for as long after the patient has left the
hospital as seems necessary. In dealing with the
realities of the home and the community situations that have contributed to the problems of the
patient, the Division is concerned with such speciﬁcs as working opportunities, living arrangements, care of children, care of aged and interim
ﬁnancial support
Last year, a total of 1,566
applications for admission to the hospital were
received. The majority of referrals (89%) came
from the New York City area, but applications
were received from every geographic section in
this country and also as far away as Brazil As
in previous years, twice as many female applicants
as male applicants sought admission. Patients
were referred by psychiatrists, social agencies,
hospitals, churches, synagogues, courts, schools,
trade unions, as well as by communities, expatients, and through publicity. Of particular
signiﬁcance was the fact that the percentage of

I

I

patients not found suitable for admittance was
19.2%, as compared with 25% the previous year
and 26% in 1955. Thus, the trend, started two
years ago, after the establishment of an Intake
Service, continues to demonstrate the effectiveThe activity
ness of pre-screening applications
of the casework division is reﬂected in the following statistics:

I

Interviews with patients,
including Out Patient Dept.

and Adolescent Unit .................... 5,110
Interviews with relatives,
including Out Patient Dept.
and Adolescent Unit .................... 5,860
Collateral Interviews ............................ 186
Interviews with discharged patients ............ 253
Interviews with relatives of
discharged patients ...................... 256
Telephone contacts with social
agencies ...................................... 5,425
Telephone contacts with relatives
of patients .................................... 10,077

The Group Work Division is concerned with

�providing a milieu in which patients can form
social relationships, assume responsibilities, develop new interests and learn new skills and so
begin to ﬁnd places, ﬁrst in the hospital community, and then in the outside community Among
important developments this year was an orientation and intake program designed so that the new
patient, helped by the social group worker,
quickly learns the social structure of the hospital,
and examines some of the groups available to him.
With help, he makes preliminary choices based
on previous experience as well as current social
interest and need As part of the trip program,
another new development, patients go to bowling
alleys, ice and roller skating rinks, and restaurants. Some patients undertake longer trips to
museums, the United Nations, or other places.
Since this requires planning, it is a measure of
the group’s ability to unite in a common goal and
These new
to sustain interest in the activity
developments supplement the program which is
the patient’s most direct link with the community

I

I

I

he has voluntarily left behind. With a group
worker assigned as advisor, all patients meet regularly in democratic self-government. They work

to solve their problems in living together, assume
some responsibility for group discipline, and plan
their social life. Many activities are carried out
by delegated members who serve on planning
committees to choose books and records, plan
parties and dances, and other social activities
An important aspect of life at Hillside is the
chronological grouping based on age and similarity of interest. There are currently clubs serving
all ages and giving each patient a chance to be a
member of a social unit of his choice. The Library
Group, for example, selects new books and magazines for patients from a practically unlimited
list. The Newspaper Group is responsible for the
writing and production of a monthly literary
magazine, “Inside Hillside” and other publications In addition to these self-chosen activities,
all patients participate in a series of current events
discussion groups, in order to keep informed
about daily events in the community they hope
to rejoin. Patients are encouraged to assume
leadership in all matters—and share their skills
with each other. As a result, at varying intervals
during the year, there have been patient-conducted groups in such varied activities as tennis,

I

I

�bridge, play reading, and theatrical production
The Group Work Division operates with a
director, supervisor, four social group workers,
two graduate social work trainees, eleven undergraduate ﬁeld work students, two part-time musical teachers, and 25 part-time volunteer workers
Last year, ten graduate social workers were
placed at Hillside for specialized training. The
Division works closely with two outside organizations, The Bridge, a group of women who help
recently discharged patients to re-establish themselves socially, to find jobs, and to maintain themselves ﬁnancially while doing so, and The Hillside
League, a club for ex-patients of Hillside. Located
in quarters maintained by The Bridge, at 231
West 83 Street in Manhattan, the League offers
social club privileges to members, including
games, TV and meeting space, and, in addition,
provides special help in ﬁnding housing, employment, further treatment, and solving other personal problems in readjustment
The QueEns
OII‘I‘ Paﬁen‘l‘ Clinic. located at the
Hospital, provides psychotherapy for residents of Queens, Nassau and Suffolk Counties who are unable to afford
a private psychiatrist. Directed by Dr. Robert R.

I

I

I

Luttrell, the Out Patient Clinic insures the availability of qualiﬁed specialists who focus on early
treatment and prevention of emotional illness. The
geographical location of the hospital’s clinic, in
a corner of Queens, bordering on Nassau County,
makes a resource for psychiatric care available to
one of the country’s fastest growing population
In 1957, the clinic treated 316 patients
areas
in individual psychotherapy. Of these, 134 cases
were carried over from 1956 and 182 were started
in treatment. 163 were discharged during the
year
from individual psychotherapy. Group therapy, a
new development in 1957, has resulted in six discharged of the 23 patients in the group. Eight
patients received electroshock therapy and 67
patients were seen in continuous casework. 267
psychological tests were performed and 285
patients were evaluated by the “intake” team.

I

Diagnoses of discharged patients were:
Psychoneurosis ..............................................53

Schizophrenia and manic depressive ............ 46
Involutional melancholia .............................. 9
Character disorder ........................................55

Conditions at discharge were:
Improved ...................................................... 1 14
Much improved ............................................ 20
Not improved .............................................. 29

I Average length of treatment at the clinic was

about nine months. Because the clinic is an out
patient facility, families remained intact and there
was little or no loss of jobs. As with in patient
care, fees are based on ability to pay, with the
average fee about $6 per week. (The cost to
provide this service is approximately $30 per
week.)
Another out patient service provided by
the Hospital is the After Care Clinic which operates ﬁve evenings a week at Mt. Sinai Hospital,
a convenient location for most patients. The Clinic
assists the discharged Hillside patient to resume
his community status, and deals with the immediate problems of job replacement, living and
resumption of old environmental contacts that
may have originally contributed to the patient’s
illness
Group psychotherapy was instituted on
a trial basis in this clinic during 1957 in an effort
to meet some of the continuing needs of these
patients.

I

I

�17%
mm/

%ﬁ”2ﬂ7ﬂﬂlgy
Research. When one out of ten adults is hospitalized for mental
illness every year, it is obvious that much is still to be learned
about why people become mentally ill. As much as has been
learned about the care of the mentally ill in the past 20 years,
there are still new areas to be studied, such as blood chemistry
and the delayed effects of the electroshock treatment Hillside
believes that in addition to treating mental patients, it is obligated to undertake research. So advanced is the hospital’s outlook that it is one of the few mental hospitals with a biochemistry
laboratory. Although the amount of current research on the
subject of mental illness is inﬁnitesimally small, Hillside employs a staﬂ of scientists and trained researchers seeking the
answer to why people become mentally ill and a surer knowledge
of how treatment effects the improvement of mental patients
The Department- of Experimental Psychiatry. during 1957,
under the direction of Dr. Max Fink, completed the ﬁrst phase
of its studies on the mechanism and effects of therapeutic techniques presently employed. Following the elucidation of the
neurophysiologic and psychologic bases of the process of convulsive therapy, a control convulsive-subconvulsive study was
undertaken in 1956 and completed in 1957. This study clearly
demonstrated the changes in brain function which are the
necessary prerequisites for change in behavior; and the psychologic, sociologic and language aspects which are fundamental
In concurrent
to “improvement” after convulsive therapy
studies, the equivalence of chlorpromazine therapy for insulin
coma, and the advantages of newer drug therapies were demonstrated in a chlorpromazine-insulin coma control study. Consequent upon these observations, an hypothesis of the mode of
action of tranquilizers was described and a program of be-

I

I

I

I

havioral assay of new drugs undertaken
Basic studies into
patterns of communication continued. By applying new techniques of psycholinguistics, objective methods of evaluating
behavioral change and “improvement” were described and are
now being tested. Studies in tactile and visual perception, neurophysiologic and psychologic bases for individual differences
in response to drugs and convulsive therapy, and biochemical
changes in spinal fluid after induced convusions continued
Support for this program increased through grants from the
Foundation’s Fund for Research in Psychiatry, the National

I

�Institute of Mental Health, and the Psychopharmacology Center
of the National Institute of Health. A research grant of $31,700
was awarded to Hillside by the Foundation’s Fund for Research
in Psychiatry. The grant was given to Dr. Joseph Jaffe of the
hospital’s Department of Experimental Psychiatry for research
in the nature of the psychiatric interview.

The Biochemistry Department was concerned principally
with blood enzyme levels in the hospital patients and with their
urinary alkaloid excretion patterns. Results of a third study
ﬂatly contradicted European reports of a blood test for schizophrenia. Under the direction of Dr. Harry Goldenberg, laboratory co-workers determined that serum cholinesterase levels in
patients receiving electroshock therapy vary according to sex,

with female patients generally higher. Work with rats suggests
that these ﬁndings may be related to an abnormal adrenal
metabolism Preliminary studies on the more acutely ill mental
patients revealed an excessive excretion of aromatic metabolites
in the urine, in agreement with the reports of other workers.
It is not yet known whether this phenomenon has a causal
relationship to schizophrenia European claims of a blood test
for schizophrenia which is based on serum oxidase (ceruloplasmin) assay were unsubstantiated. Positive tests were
obtained in various conditions other than mental disease
(pregnancy, upper respiratory infections, cancer), while many
well-fed patients gave negative tests. It was concluded that the

I

I

European patients who were studied probably were suﬂering
from a Vitamin C deﬁciency.

M ~”‘waﬁrm/WNWwWa/WM‘ WM

l/lMWn/WWVWVWW

vv

4

MUM/WWWW4“:WM
WW “WA/WWW Mil/wk}

WWW «WWW-mekmrmwwvymmm
AWWx W'WWVWWWWWMrMWW/VW
MANN“

�I

During 1957, members of Hillside’s staff were much in

demand as guest lecturers and convention speakers. As the
hospital continues to prove its value as a pioneer in the
“open hospital” philosophy, more and more demands are
made on the staff for intensive training courses, lectures and
publications. Staff members spoke at meetings of national
organizations including the American Psychiatric Association, and the National Conference of Jewish Communal Service, state groups including the New York State Society for

Mental Health, and local groups including the North Queens
Mental Hygiene Association and the Queens County Mental

Health Society

I

Staff members reported on therapy and

research and other results in a large number of professional
publications, The Journal of the Hillside Hospital, edited by
Dr. Sidney Tarachow, included articles by staff members and
also outside contributors.

�Publications 1957:
R. L.

I

Esecover. H.. Juffe. J. and Kuhn.

R. L.: Psychotherapeutic Techniques with Electroshock Patients, J. Hillside Hosp. (in press)

and Green. M. A.: Experimental studies of the Electroshock Process Dis. Nerv. Syst. ( in press)

I

I

I

Fink. M.. Kuhn.

Fink. M.. Shuw. R.. Gross. G. and Colemun. F. 5.: Comparative

Study of Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma in the Therapy of Psychosis, J. Amer. Med. Assoc. (in press)
Threshold, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. (in press)

I

I

Fink. M.: Lateral Gaze Nystagmus as an Index of the Sedation

Fink. M.: Individual Differences in EEG Responsivity. Read at Metropolitan EEG Society, New York, February 1957

Fink. M.: Criteria in Evaluation of Clinical Behavioral Change: Neurophysiologic Aspects. Presented at A.P.A., Round Table, Chicago, May 1957

I

and Green. M. A.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. Read at the Society of Biological Psychiatry, Atlantic City, June 1957
Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration in Brain Function in Behavior. Presented at Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, Sept. 1957
Korin. H.: Effects of Diffuse Altered Brain Function on Perception. Presented at the XV Int. Congress of Psychology, Brussels, August 1957
Behavioral Patterns in Induced States of Altered Brain Function. Read at the New York Divisional Meeting, A.P.A., Nov. 1957
Shift for Psychiatry. Read at Metropolitan EEG Society, N. Y., Nov. 1957

81

I

Fink. M.. Kuhn. R. L.

Fink. M. and Kuhn. R. I..:

Fink. M.. Kuhn. R. L. and
Fink. M. and Kuhn. R. L.:

Fink. M.: Signiﬁcance of EEG Frequency

I Fink. M.: Effects of Diethazine on EEG and Signiﬁcance for Theory of Process of Convulsive Therapy.

Read at Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, New York, Dec. 1957
Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

I

I

I

I

Fink. M. and Kuhn. R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in

Psychiat. 78: 516-525, 1957

I

Fink. M.: A Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies,

�J. Hillside Hosp. 6: 197-206, 1957

I

Goldenberg. H.. and White.

D. L.: Chromatographic, Electrophoretic and Colorimetric Procedures for the Psychotomimetic and Psycho-

therapeutic Drugs; Presented at the Meeting-in-Miniature of the Metropolitan-Long Island Sub-section, New York Section, American Chemical Society, Brooklyn, New York,

February 15, 1957

I

Goldenberg. H.. and Goldenberg. V.: Speciﬁc Colorimetric Determination of Cholinesterase Activity in Blood and Spinal Fluid; Presented at the

Meeting-in-Miniature of the Metropolitan-Long Island Sub-section, New York Section, American Chemical Society, Brooklyn, New York, February 15, 1957

Inhibition of Serum Cholinesterase by Mental Drugs, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 66: 466-467, 1957
Electroshock, J. Hillside Hosp. 6: 229-240, 1957

Juffe. J.: Criteria in Evaluation

I

Juffe. J.:

I

Green. M. A.: Signiﬁcance of Individual Variability

Study of Communication in Psychiatric Interviews. Read at the New York Divisional Meeting, A.P.A. Nov. 1957
Response to Electroshock Therapy. Presented at Electroshock Research Association, Chicago, May 1957

Induced Altered Brain Function. Read at Amer. Psychol. Assoc., New York, August 1957

Hosp. 6: 216-228, 1957

I

I

I

I

in EEG Response to

Juffe. J.:

I

An Objective

Kuhn. R. L. and Fink. M.: Personality Factors in Behavorial

Kuhn. R. L. and Fink. M.: Perception of Embedded F igurm After

Kuhn. R. L. and Fink. M.: Perception of Embedded Figures After Induced Altered

Kuhn. R. L.. Pollack. M. and Fink. M.: Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in 3 Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

Tarachaw. S. and Friedman. S.): Perception Experiments in

241-250, 1957

I

I

I

I

I

Kuhn. R. L. and Fink. M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol. (in press)

N. Y. Neurol. Society, N. U., Jan. 1957

Goldenberg. H.:

An Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric Interviews, J. Hillside Hosp. 6: 207-215, 1957

of Clinical Behavorial Change: Psycholinguistic Aspects. Presented at A.P.A., Round Table, Chicago, May 1957

Brain Function, Amer. Psychol. 12: 361, 1957

I

a Study of Ambivalence. Read at Section on Neurology

&amp;

Korin. H. (with

Psychiatry of N. Y. Academy of Medicine and

Karin. H. and Fink. M.: Role of Stimulus Intensity in Perception of Simultaneous Cutaneous Electrical Stimuli, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:

Korin. H. (with Tarachow. S. and Friedman. S.): Perception Experiments in a Study of Ambivalence, Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. 78: 167-176, 1957

I

Karin. H. (with Tarachow. S. and Friedman. S.): The Relation of Ambivalence to Aggression and Authority in Psychoneurotic Patients. Read at Amer. Psychol. Assoc., New
York, Sept. 1957

I Karin. H.

(with Tarachow. S. and Friendman. 5.): Studies in Ambivalence. Presented before Schilder Society, New York,

Oct. 1957

I

Pollack. M.

(with Goldfurb. W. and Dorsen. M.): Pain Reactions in Schizophrenic Children. Presented at Amer. Orthopsychiatric Assoc., Chicago, March 1957

I

Polluck. M. (with

Krieger. H. P.): Oculmotor and Postural Patterns in Schizophrenic Children. Presented at Amer. Academy of Neurology, Boston, April 1957

I

Pollack. M. (with

Buttersby. W. S. and Bender.

M.

3.): Figure-ground Perception in Patients with Cerebral Tumor. Read at Eastern Psychol. Assoc.,

N. Y., April 1957

I Pollack. M. (with

�Battersby. W. S. and Bender. M. B.): Defects in Visual Perception in Brain Tumor
Patients. Presented before Int. Congress of Psychol., Brussels, July 1957
M.

I

Pollack

(with Battersby. W. S. and Bender. M. B.): Visual Deﬁcit After Brain Damage

in

Man as Measured with Rapidly-Exposed Chromatic Stimuli. Presented at Amer. Psycho].
Assoc., New York, Sept. 1957

l

Pollack. M. (with Goldfurb. A.): Cultural and En-

Vironmental Factors Affecting Complex Perception in the Institutionalized Aged. Presented
at the Gerontological Society, Cleveland, Oct. 1957

l

Pollack. M.: Brain Damage, Mental

Retardation and Childhood Schizophrenia. Presented at New York Divisional Meeting, A.P.A.
Nov. 1957
and“;

a.

I

Pollack. M. (with Goldfarb. W.): Face-Hand Test in Schizophrenic Chil-

dren, AMA. Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. 77: 635-642, 1957

farb. W.): Patterns of Orientation

I

Pollack. M. (with Gold-

in Children in Residential Treatment for Severe

Behavior Disorders, Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 27: 3, 538-552, 1957

Battersby. W. S. and Bender.

M.

I

Pollack. M. (with

BJ: Tachistoscopic Identiﬁcation of Contour in Patients

with Brain Damage, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychei. 50: 3, 220-227, 1957

(with Battersby. W.

S.

I

Pollack. M.

and Bender. M. 3.): Visual Deﬁcit After Brain Damage in Man

as Measured with Rapidly-Exposed Chromatic Stimuli, Amer. Psychol. 12: 7, 468, 1957

I

Pollack. M. (with Goldfarb. W.): Cultural and Environmental Factors Affecting Complex
Perception in the Institutionalized Aged, J. Gerontol., 12: 4, 437-438, 1957

I

Zierer.

E.

(with Zierer. Edith): Leonardo Da Vinci’s Artistic Proclivity and Creative Sterility, The
American Imago, Vol. 14, No.

4«,

1957.

Each publication is a tribute to the vision of the hospital’s founder, the late Dr. Israel Strauss.

�gar ZM/
*w

U
473/ c

Jywwﬂky

The Residenf Training Program at Hillside continues to
emphasize the interrelation between the training program and the
treatment program. Each Resident carries a case load of about 15
patients under the supervision of staff and visiting instructors.
and attends lecture conferences conducted by the medical director. Lecture seminars in the ﬁelds of psychopathology and psychotherapy, and reading seminars, are conducted by special
instructors chosen from the hospital staff. Qualiﬁed Residents
are assigned to the Department of Experimental Psychiatry for
clinical and other psychiatric research projects. During the year
there were 18 Residents in training, 15 in the adult in patient
service and three in the Israel Strauss Adolescent Pavilion
The hospital training program extends also to Clinical Assistants
in the Out Patient and After-Care Clinics and on-the-job training
of personnel. Regular lectures and conferences are scheduled
for nurses and attendants, social workers, members of the various adjunctive services and for afﬁliating students from other
educational institutions. Included in the latter was the establishment of a very important afﬁliated training program for student
The Sunday Clinical Connurses from Queens College
ferences. open to and attended by psychiatrists and other
professional personnel and by outstanding visiting physicians,
are part of the Resident training program and are based on
cases prepared by the Residents. They continue to make a signiﬁcant contribution to the training picture on the New York
The third annual Israel Strauss Lecture,
psychiatric scene
established in 1955 in honor of Hillside’s founder and late president, was delivered this year on May 5th. The speaker was
Norman Reider, M.D., Chairman, Education Committee of the
San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute. The topic of his lecture
As anticipated, the Medical
was “Transference Psychosis"
Library has become a very important feature of the teaching
and research activities of the hospital
The Journal of the
Hillside Hospi‘l‘al again showed an increase in the number
of its subscribers and an indication of its greater inﬂuence and
wider acceptance in the ﬁeld. Thus the Journal has met the
expectations with which it was launched in 1952.

I

I

I

I

I

��The Israel Strauss Adolescen'l' Pavilion. in its third year,
continues as a resident treatment center for a selected group of
emotionally ill girls between the ages of 13 and 17. Due to the
experimental nature of work with adolescents, only a limited
number of applicants are accepted. Because of the intensiveness of
the program, adolescent girls are kept at the Pavilion under treatment for a much longer period of time than the adult patients.
In 1957, the average period of hospitalization for the adolescents
was 300 days, as compared to 192 days for the adults

I Although

there have been recurring problems with shortages of trained
personnel, the pilot program of the Adolescent Pavilion has
proceeded as planned, and many new discoveries have been
made
The seventeen girls who Were admitted in 1957 were
afforded the opportunity for intensive psychotherapy and a well-

I

structured living experience. In an atmosphere reminiscent of
a girls’ boarding school, a professional team has worked to

make this unique program succeed. The team, under the direction of Dr. Alice Slater Stahl, includes three psychiatrists, a
psychologist, nurses, teachers, an occupational therapist, a
group activity worker, plus the non-professional help of nurses’
aides, members of the housekeeping and kitchen departments
and volunteers. A two story building includes all therapy facilities as well as dining and lounging areas. The semi-private
rooms are furnished to allow for the fact that disturbed adolescents are often more destructive than adult patients

I It is

�believed that if Hillside can work out techniques for treating

emotionally ill adolescent girls, much can be learned about the
problems of child guidance and juvenile delinquency. Certainly
much of what has been learned in the past year can be applied
to adult treatment. During the year, it was discovered that the

original plan for isolating the girls did not work out as Well
as integrating certain aspects of the program with adult activities. It has also been found that certain adolescents made more
rapid recovery when transferred to adult cottages. The plan
to let the girls attend school in the outside community was
abandoned in favor of school inside the Hospital, though sep-

arate from the Pavilion since the experience of “going to
school” is important to the youngsters
The girls became in-

I

terested in sewing and put on two fashion shows of their handiwork. One of these fashion shows was the highlight of the 10th
Annual Hillside Hospital Field Day. They also made the drapes

for the dining and recreation rooms in the Pavilion. In addition, unusual work has been done in ceramics, painting and
metals

I

Of the 120 applications received during the
year,
26 patients were screened and 17 were admitted. An
attempt
was made to evaluate each applicant to determine suitability

of $52,400 from The Ford Foundation was used to expand the

research, training and patient facilities, including extensions
and improvements of the Adolescent Girls Pavilion
During
the year, the Out Patient Clinic of the Adolescent Unit provided

I

treatment for 22 girls. Four doctors worked to provide a total
of almost 450 psychotherapeutic sessions. Two social workers
continued their casework and counselling services with the
families, and helped with vocational planning, schooling, job
hunting and social problems
The After Care program has

I

provided short term aid in the transition period between the hospital and community life, as well as longer term psychotherapy.

Work With Other Organizations. No organization dealing
with patients can operate in a completely isolated manner. Hillside’s emphasis on treatment of the patient as a whole, with
particular regard to the family, pre-admission care, and post

discharge care and follow-up, has resulted in working relationship with the following agencies whose invaluable cooperation
has made these programs possible:
ALTRO WORKSHOP

FEDERATION EMPLOYMENT AND GUIDANCE SERVICE

based not only on the criteria of illness, but upon the patient’s
ability to beneﬁt from the hospital’s facilities, as well as the

DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY

existing group composition at the time. There was an average
waiting period of three months after acceptance
A grant

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF NEW YORK

I

JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF LONG ISLAND

NEW YORK ASSOCIATION FOR NEW AMERICANS

�/%
ﬁﬁwl/ 7/

[Ma/whzm'éW/Mt

This Annual Report has given a great deal of data regarding service to
patients, treatment facilities and research. It has summed up a large complex
organization’s work on behalf of the mentally ill, their families and the
community which surrounds them. A most signiﬁcant aspect of our work
is the extent to which we have been able to mobilize ﬁnancial support from
many sources. Perhaps the most concrete and rigorous index of the adequacy
of a philanthropic organization’s performance can be gleaned from the way
in which it is supported in the realistic world of ﬁnance. It is therefore
signiﬁcant that we passed this rigorous test quite successfully during 1957.
Our work received excellent support from the City of New York, through
its contributions toward the care of the medically-indigent, mentally-ill
patient. The Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York gave substantial help in deﬁcit ﬁnancing. Without Federation’s tremendous interest,
its constant readiness to give advice and assistance, and its careful and
generous consideration of our ﬁnancial requirements, Hillside could not
have developed the excellent and challenging programs described in this
report. Our research programs, started only a few years ago, have begun
to command increasing attention in the psychiatric world and signiﬁcant
attention—support-wise—in the community at large. More than ﬁfty percent of our research expenditures were met by outside sources, such as the
United States Public Health Service and various foundations. The total
research deﬁcit was met by contributions from our Board of Directors
and their friends Our chief items of expense are for treatment and training programs. The table below gives the comparative total cost of these
programs for 1956 and 1957.

I

The In Patient Service continued to operate at 97% of capacity, while—
at the same time—the average income per patient day followed the trend
established several years ago of rising each year, in this case by 130 per
day. The average cost per patient day, however, rose by $1.53. Therefore,
the average loss per patient day in the In Patient Service rose from 40c to
$1.80. These changes rise out of the whole complex of increasing cost of
operation. In 1956, total expenses of $1,326,454. represented a rise of
12.82% over the previous year; in 1957, with expenditures rising by
$169,238, the percentage increase was virtually the same—13%. It is
interesting to note the extent to which this year’s increase is related to

inﬂationary forces in the community, or to actual improvement or changes
in services rendered. It is therefore signiﬁcant that those aspects of expense
which are most stable and most clearly related to the price index—Salaries,
Food, and Maintenance and Grounds—rose by 7%, 5% and 5% respectively,
while the following items more clearly related to quality and quantity of
service rendered rose as follows:
Administrative Expense
20%
Medical Supplies
Repairs and Replacements
Clinics (Out Patient Service)

24%
39%
30%

Again, as in the past several years, the Out Patient Clinic Services accounted
for the largest item of increase, reflecting the continued expansion of our
preventative programs. This expansion was made possible entirely by
grants from the New York City Community Mental Health Board, the
State Mental Health Authority, the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies
of New York and, during 1957 — for the ﬁrst time — by the participation
of the Nassau County Mental Health Board. Included in the increased cost
of Out Patient Services was the expansion of the Foster Home Care Program
for discharged patients, carried jointly with the Jewish Community Services
of Long Island and made possible by the Federation ofJewish Philanthropies.
MAURICE BACHRACH

COMPARISON OF COSTS 1956-1957
1956
Salaries ................................................................ $
Food ....................................................................
Maintenance and Grounds ................................
Administrative Expenses ....................................
Medical Supplies ..................................................
Repairs and Replacements ..................................
Clinics ..................................................................

1957

797,805.
113,428.
59,436.
82,608.
23,950.
35,105.
214,122.

3 855,848.

Tofal ............ 1.326.454.

1.495.692.

Total No. Patients ................................................
Total Patient Days ................................................
Average Income per patient day ........................ $
Average cost per patient day ..............................
Average loss per patient per day ........................ $5

119,350.
62,654.
98,952.
29,811.
49,021.
280,056.

561

545

70,189
15.44
15.84

$

.40

$

69,987
15.57
17.37
1.80

�PRESIDENT—Alvin E. Coleman*
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD—Roy

Foster*

HONoRARY CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD—Leon

Lowenstein‘

VICE-PRESIDENT—Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.*

Herbert Beskind”
VICE-PRESIDENT—George W. Galinger*
SECRETARY—Manuel Lee Robbins*
TREASURER—~Arn01d S. Askin“
VICE-PRESIDENT—D.

ASSISTANT SECRETARY—Alfred
ASSISTANT SECRETARY—~M.

Appel
Victor Leventritt

ASSISTANT TREASURER—Arthur

Carson
ASSISTANT TREASURER—Harry Silverson
HONORARY DIRECTORS—Hilda Strauss and Saul Blickman

Board of Directors
A. Jacob Abrams

Alfred Appel
Arnold S. Askin“
John M. Bendheim
D. Herbert Beskind“
Saul Blickman
Alvin E. Coleman"
Morris David
Thomas Epstein

Arthur C. Fatt"
David Finkle
David Finn
Roy Foster“
George W. Galinger“
Arthur Carson
Maurice Glinert
Meyer Goldstein
Jacob Epstein KatzT
M. Victor Leventritt

Budd LevinsonT
Morris L. Levinson
Milton B. Loeb
Sandor Lorand, M.D.
Leon Lowenstein*
Charles H. Meyer*

'

Walter Scheuer
Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.*
Harry Silverson
Hilda Strauss

Irving Weissglassi
Nathan Wigod
Morton S. Wolf *
Walter D. Yankauer“

Arthur Murray
Manuel Lee Robbins*
Irving Rosenbaum
S. H. Seheuer‘

Chairmen of Standing Committees
Foster
MEDICAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE—D. Herbert Beskind
FINANCE COMMITTEE—Arnold S. Askin
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE—Roy

HOUSE AND GROUNDS COMMITTEE—

George W. Galinger, Nathan Wigod—Co-Chairmen
LEGAL COMMITTEE—Charles H. Meyer
SOCIAL SERVICE coMMITTEE—Hilda Strauss
LIAISON coMMITTEE—L. 1. Jewish Hospital—Alvin E. Coleman
PUBLICITY COMMITTEE—Arthur C. F att
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE—Meyer Goldstein
PLANNING coMMITTEE—Meyer Goldstein
GIFTS AND LEGACIES COMMITTEE—Walter D.
* Executive

Committee Members
T Elected in I957

Yankauer

�Miller, M.D.
ASSOCIATE MEDICAL DIRECTOR—~Simon Kwalwasser, M.D.
ADMINISTRATOR—Maurice Bachrach, B.S.
SUPERVISING PSYCHIATRISTS—George Yessin, M.D.
Gerhard Schauer, M.D.
Robert Navarre, M.D.
Zenos M. Linnell, M.D.
Harold Esecover, M.D.*
MEDICAL DIRECTOR—Joseph S. A.

DIRECTOR, ISRAEL STRAUSS ADOLESCENT PAVILION—

Alice Slater Stahl, M.D.
SUPERVISING PSYCHIATRIST, ISRAEL STRAUSS ADOLESCENT
PAVILION, OUT PATIENT DEP’T.—Eugene Glynn,
DIRECTOR OF OUT PATIENT SERVICES—Robert

M.D.

R. Luttrell, M.D.

DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH IN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY—

Maxirriilian Fink, M.D.
INTERNIST—Arnold Blumberg, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF LABORATORIES—Harry

Resident Staff
Norman Ackerman, M.D.
Barre Alan, M.D.
Stanley Brodsky, M.D.*
Bernard Cohen, M.D.
Frederick Coleman, M.D.*
Warren Cox, M.D.
Alan Dobrow, M.D.
Necdet Ecder, M.D.

Ilhan Ermutlu, M.D.
Stefano Faj rajzen, M.D.
Marie Friedman, M.D.
Stanley M. Friedman, M.D.*
Ruth Fuchs, M.D.”
Harold Galef, M.D.*
Robert S. Gilbert, M.D.T
Victor Coldin, M.D.*

Michael Gould, M.D.
Sherwin Harris, M.D.
Edwin Kleinman, M.D.
A. Russell Lee, M.D.”
Leon .Lefer, M.D.*
Henry Lefkowits, M.D.
Sidney Lytton, M.D.
Robert Nodine, M.D.

Goldenberg, Ph.D.

Paul Pressman, M.D.
Arthur Root, M.D.*
Alvaro Rozo, MD.
Herbert Schulman, M.D.
Myron Stein, M.D.*
Carl Towbin, M.D.
Margery Wile, M.D.

Other Professional Staff Heads
Goldie Krupa, R.N.—DIRECTOR OF NURSING

Abraham Lurie, M.S.S.W.—DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Abraham Levine, Ph.D.—DIRECTOR 0F PSYCHOLOGY
Ernest Zierer, Ph.D.—DIRECTOR 0F CREATIVE THERAPY
Eileen P. Fisher, B.S.—DIRECTOR OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
Arnold Eisen, M.S.S.W.——DIRECTOR OF GROUP WORK DIVISION
Angelina Canavan, B.A.——DIETITIAN

n

Department Heads

*

Completed residency in 1957
1’ Deceased 1957

Dorothy Croghan—ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR
Lillian Bailey—OFFICE MANAGER
Thomas R. Lumley—SUPERINTENDENT 0F BUILDINGS &amp; GROUNDS
Sarah Travers—EXECUTIVE HOUSEKEEPER

snag—hr,

g
..

f

�PRESIDENT—M. David Epstein, M.D.*

VICE-PRESIDENT—Robert A. Savitt, M.D.*
SECRETARY—Sidney L. Green, M.D.*
TREASURER—Paul Scheman, D.D.S.*

Ex-PRESIDENT—Samuel Atkin, M.D.*

Samuel Atkin, M.D.*
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.*
M. David Epstein, M.D.*
Margaret E. Fries, M.D.
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.*

Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Sidney Klein, M.D.
Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.
H. L. Rachlin, M.D.*
Lawrence J. Roose, M.D.

George S. Goldman, M.D.
Sidney L. Green, M.D.*
William Karliner, M.D.
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.

Robert A. Savitt, M.D.*
Martin Schreiber, M_D_
Isidor Silbermann, M.D.*
Otto Sperling, M.D
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.*

Cohen, M.D.*
DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY—Morris B. Bender, M.D.
DEPARTMENT OF DENTISTRY—Paul Scheman, D.D.S.

DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE—Lester
DIRECTOR OF
DIRECTOR OF

ADOLESCENT PAVILION—Sidney

L. Green, M.D.

COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS—Robert

A, Savitt, M.D.

C‘REDENTIALS; COMMITTEE FOR PSYCHIATRIC STAFF &amp; PROMOTIONS——

Martin Schreiber, M.D.
CREDENTIALS COMMITTEE FOR NON-PSYCHIATRIC STAFF &amp; PROMOTIONS:—

Paul Scheman, D.D.S.
STAFF—Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.
GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY—Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.
MANHATTAN AFTER-CARE- CLINIC—Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.
EDUCATION OF RESIDENT

PATIENTCLINIC—William,Karliner, M.D.
RESEARCH COMMITTEE—Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.
QUEENS OUT

Peter Glauber,M.D.
JOURNAL .SUB-COMMITTEE—Sidney Tarachow, M.D.
‘iTDQM;MIT-'I‘EE‘FOR ADIUNCTIVE‘ SERVICES—4'1. 'Peter Glauber, M.D.
PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE—e41.

:CREDENTIALSCOMMI‘TTEE TORSUPERVISING- PSYCHIATRIC AND RESIDENT STAFF——

Sidney Klein, M.D..
COMMITTEE FOR LIAISON WITH LONG ,ISLANDRJEWYSH HOSPITAL..—

Arnold/Eisendorfe‘r, M.D.
,

‘*E’ixéé tsive :Coimmitte'e» M ember;

\

i"

'V

I

'

&gt;

v

,
‘

'

:

"

�%[7ZMW%

WWM/ W

Consultants

Psychiatry

up

OZ

Medicine

Neurology

Leonard Blumgart, M.D.
Sandor Lorand, M.D.
Irving J. Sands, M.D.
Nathaniel E. Selby, M.D.
Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.

Alfred Angrist, M.D.
Morris S. Bender, M.D.
Oscar Levin, M.D.
.1. Jesse Levy, M.D.

A. M. Rabiner, M.D.

Surgery

Gynecology

Dentistry

Hans Strauss, M.D.
I. S. Wechsler, M.D.

David Warshaw, M.D.

Julius Jarcho, M.D.

Morris Fierstein, D.D.S.

George S. Goldman, M.D.
Sidney L. Green, M.D.
William Karliner, M.D.
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.

Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Sidney Klein, M.D.
Attilio Laguardia, M.D.
Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.
Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.

Lawrence J. Roose, M.D.
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.
Martin Schreiber, M.D.

5011

Goodman, M.D.
Samuel R. Lehrman, M.D.

Abraham S. Lenzner, M.D.
Martin H. Orens, M.D.

William W. Pike, M.D.
Aaron Stein, M.D.

Isadore H. Cohn, M.D.
Irving J. Crain, M.D.
Albert E. Goldberg, M.D.
Albert Harrison, M.D.
Thomas Hora, M.D.
Abraham Kaplan, M.D.
Louis Kaywin, M.D.

Bruce Kendall, M.D.
George P. Krupp, M.D.
Peter Laderman, M.D.
Harold S. Leopold, M.D.
David Milrod, M.D.

Irving Salan, M.D.
Frederick F. Shevin, M.D.
Jay Stanton, M.D.
Samuel Tabbat, M.D.
Fred U. Tate, M.D.
Leonard Weinroth, M.D.
Herbert Wieder, M.D.

Attending Psychiatrists

'

Samuel Atkin, M.D.
Frank Berchenko, M.D.
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.
M. David Epstein, M.D.
Margaret E. Fries, M.D.
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.

Isidor Silbermann, M.D.
Otto Sperling, M.D.
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.

Associate Attending Psychiatrists
Cornelius Beukenkamp, M.D.
Alexander J. Friedman, M.D.
Mark L. Gerstle, J r., M.D.

Adiunct Attending Phychiatrists
Edward R. Adelson, M.D.
Renato J. Almansi, M.D.
Herman S. Alpert, M.D.
Irving L. Bauer, M.D.
Benjamin J. Becker, M.D.
Julius Belinkoﬁ, M.D.
Milton M. Berger, M.D.
Lionel H. Blackman, M.D.

Hugh Mullan, M.D.
Helene Papanek, M.D.

�MD.
VISITING PHYSICIAN—George Sabrin, M.D.
DIRECTOR—Lester Cohen,

Rosenblum, M.D.
VISITING PHYSICIAN—A. Blumberg, M.D.
ASSOCIATE PHYSICIAN—M. Kalkstein, M.D.
ASSOCIATE PHYSICIAN—J. Weinstein, M.D.
ADJUNCT PHYSICIAN—A. L. Berger, M.D.
ADJUNCT PHYSICIAN—W. B. Brett, M.D.
VISITING DERMATOLOGIST—C. Stritzler, M.D.
ASSOCIATE DERMATOLOGIST—Joel Schweig, M.D.
ADJUNCT DERMATOLOGIST—N. Goldfarb, M.D.
VISITING PHYSICIAN—L.

VISITING NEUROLOGIST—Morris B.

Bender, M.D.T
ASSOCIATE NEUROLOGIST—Kurt Adler, M.D.
ADJUNCT NEUROLOGIST—Harry Harter, M.D.I

Hirsch, M.D.
VISITING NEUROSURGEON—Joseph Siris, M.D.
VISITING UROLOGIST—L. G. Goldberg, M.D.’r
VISITING UROLOGIST—Daniel Kaufman, M.D.
ADJUNCT UROLOGIST—Albert Sutton, M.D.
VISITING SURGEON—~Sidney

VISITING ORTHOPEDIST—A. H.

Lewert, M.D.

Schneiderman, M.D.
VISITING PROCLTOLOGIST—B. Warner, M.D.
VISITING-OPHTHALMOLOGIST——E. Seretan, M.D.

VISITING GYNECOLOGIST—M.
VISITING GYNECOLOGIST—H.

Warner, M.D.
Dubrow, M.D.

Cohen, MD.
ASSOCIATE GYNECOLOGIST—Bernard Greenblat, M.D.
ADJUNCT GYNECOLOGIST—Eugene Streim, M.D.
ASSOCIATE GYNECOLOGIST—Jack

VISITING RADIOLOGIST—Bernard

Epstein, M.D.

DIRECTOR—Paul Scheman, D.D.S.
ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR—J. G.

Rubin, D.D.S.
ASSOCIATE DENTIST—B. Schwaid, D.D.S.
ASSOCIATE DENTIST—B. Lebow, D.D.S.
ADJUNCT DENTIST—H. Lewis, D.D.S.
ADJUNCT DENTIST—H. Adler, D.D.S.’r
ADJUNCT DENTIST—S. Plotnick, D.D.S.
ADJ-UNCT DENTIST—E. Friedman, D.D.S.
ADJUNCT DENTIST—M. Protell, D.D.S.
ADJUNCT DENTIST—L. Basson, D.D.S.

STAFF OPTOMETRIST—-Edward L.
STA-FF

Steinberg, O.D_.
OPTOMETRIST—Bernard Attinson, O.D.

ASSOCIATE ORTHOPEDIST—J.

Minsky, M.D.
OTOLARYNGOLOGIST—S. Clayton, M."D.
ANE-S'THESIOLOGIST—Ceorges Bean, M.D.

ASSOCIATE OPHiTHALMOLOGIST——A.

VISITING
VISITING

STAFF 'PODIATRIST—Sam

Resigned 195;?
I Deceased 1795-7
T

Sokolov, Pod.0.

�Lester I. Abend, M.D.
Ruth Adams, M.D.*
Romano Antonelli, M.D.
Howard Boskey, M.D.

Paul Bradlow, M.D.
Stanley Brodsky, M.D.
Arline Caldwell, M.D.
Mischa Caplan, M.D.
Daniel Chansky, M.D.
Lionel Chertoﬁ, M.D.
Rita M. Chalef, M.D.
Gloria Chung, M.D.“

*

Resigned I 957

Ralph W. Clemments, M.D.
Julius Colantuono, M.D.*
Frances Colonna, M.D.
Fred Dalton, M.D.*
Irving J. Farber, M.D.
Robert D. Ferrell, M.D.
Philip Friedland, M.D.
Harvey Coldey, M.D.
Victor Goldin, M.D.
Sumner I. Goldstein, M.D.
Clara Gonda, M.D.
Harry Gonda, M.D.

David Graubert, M.D.
Howard Hess, M.D.*

Martin Hurvitz, M. D.
Gunthar Jacob, M.D.
Wilbur Jarvis, M.D.
Peritz Levinson, M.D.
Buck Luria, M.D.
Daniel Miller, M.D.
Meyer Monchek, M.D.
Beatrice Nachtigal, M.D.
Iris Orens, M.D.*
Edward Pinney, J r., M.D.

Joshua Ramot, M.D.*
William Roosen, M.D.
Phoebe Rosen, M.D.
Joseph D. Rosen, M.D.
Henry Rosberger, M.D.
J ehuda Rozanski, M.D.
Gabriel Rubin, M.D.
Charles Silberman, M.D.
Herman Tannor, M.D.“
Leon Tec, M.D.
David M. Tillim, M.D.
Clara Torda, M.D.
Aimee Wiggers, M.D.

�Hillside Hospital is a member of:
AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION
FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES
GREATER NEW YORK HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK STATE
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF JEWISH COMMUNAL SERVICE

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HYGIENE
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE

NEW YORK STATE WELFARE CONFERENCE
QUEENSBORO COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

UNITED HOSPITAL FUND
WELFARE AND HEALTH COUNCIL OF NEW YORK CITY

We are fully accredited by:
JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS

1%gzlled/ZJ

”42/ QWMJ
.

OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA

(NO p recise words are necessar y to a valid le g ac y to the

We are approved for re51dent tralnlng by:
.

.

é % WM
.

.

Society. The following form, however, may be suggested.)

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
'
We .C arr y Jom
t progr am S i n which 5 p eciﬁc s e rvice~b to p atients are ad,
,
,
mlnlstered by the hospltal and pald for by tax-supported publlc agenCIes:

I give to the Society of the Hillside Hospital, for the use 0/ the Hillside

'

_

_

Hospital, the sum of
_

$_—__—_(if

land or any speciﬁc property,

NASSAU COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH BOARD

such as bonds ’ stocks ’ ece
t ‘e r a, iS g i”e n ’ a b r'“3f

NEW YORK CITY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH BOARD

should be inserted instead of the words “the sum of

NEW YORK STATE MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALS
DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, NEW YORK STATE

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
NEW YORK CITY, BOARD OF EDUCATION
UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE,

INSTITUTES OF MENTAL HEALTH

We have established programs of community education and community

mental hygiene with:
QUEENS COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SOCIETY
NASSAU COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SOCIETY

'

descnp tio " 0/5 h 5 P r 0P3 r‘9’

$_____”).

�An aﬂiliate 0f the Federation of Jewish P/zilant/Lropies of New York

�31:!

ANNUAL REPORT

V~
A

FOR THE YEAR
1958
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS, QUEENS, N.

Y.

��Federatwn

f

0

a partzczpant 0f- the
Fund and the Créat‘erg

��TABLE OF CONTENTS
report of the director of professional services
report of the medical director
report of the President of the Medical Board
report of the President of the Board of Trustees
treatment
psychotherapy and medical services
psychology department
intramural clinic
nursing department
department of dentistry
occupational and creative therapy
adolescent pavilion
organization chart insert
social service department
casework division
group work division
Manhattan after-care clinic
Israel and Hilda Strauss League
Queens out-patient service

Training programs
Sunday clinical conferences
Israel Strauss lectures
medical library
research
experimental psychiatry
department of biochemistry
medical department
Hillside publications
Hillside journal
grants and awards received 1958
report of the administrator
society of the Hillside Hospital

3
4
6
7

10-13
‘10

10
11
11
11

12
12
16-17

14-19
14
15
18
18
18
19
19
19
19

22-23
22
22
23
24-

25
25
27

30-32

�report of the
director of
professional services
LEWIS L. ROBBINS, M.D.

As a very new member of the staff of
Hillside Hospital, I should like to look

ahead rather than participate in a review
of the past year.
A forward-looking plan for the future
development of Hillside Hospital is essential if it is to serve best the needs of
the community today and tomorrow.
The three main areas of activity at
Hillside today are clinical service, education and research. We will never lose
sight of our primary day-to-day service,
which is the treatment of the mentally
ill. Yet to consider enlarging the capacity of Hillside—to help more of the
people who are psychiatrically ill—is
not the answer for the future. Experience of larger institutions indicates the
weakness of this approach.
When the capacity of a psychiatric
hospital is expanded beyond a certain
point, individualized treatment of patients gives way to regimentation. The
result is that the quality of clinical service falls.
It is more probable that Hillside can
best serve the community by striving to
advance our knowledge of psychiatry

for the greater good of everyone,

whether or not he is ever a patient at
Hillside Hospital; and by training professional personnel who will later make
use of what they have learned here in

other institutions throughout the
country.
The main shortage in psychiatry today
is knowledge. Although there have been
tremendous advances in the past 50
years, much remains to be learned. And
while much has been spent in the development of all types of psychiatric facilities, relatively little ﬁnancial support
has been given to psychiatric research.
It is therefore recommended that the
excellent facilities of Hillside Hospital
and its present and potential relationships with other institutions in the area
be utilized primarily for the advancement of psychiatric knowledge.
A unique and productive approach
would be the long-range goal of an

Institute for Advanced Psychiatric

Studies established at Hillside. Although
there exists today an excellent research
program at Hillside, it represents but
a small fraction of the many types of

AHEAD

research that could be successfully conducted here.
The clinical program of the hospital
provides a great variety of clinical problems, as well as opportunity for thorough observation. The forward-looking
philosophy of Hillside Hospital, along
with its utilization of personnel from
many different disciplines, constitute an
excellent foundation for the development of a broad research program.
Such a research program would develop spontaneously if personnel were
adequate—both qualitatively and quantitatively—to take care of our clinical
responsibilities. A staff must be developed who are not only good clinicians
but who also possess an interest in and
capacity for both teaching and research.
The need for trained personnel in
psychiatry is urgent. Hillside already
has accepted education as one of its
principal functions; and this function
could very well be expanded without
detracting from the research objectives
which may be established.
Hillside Hospital thus will continue
to be a pilot institution providing the
best psychiatric treatment currently
available, constantly striving to develop
newer and better methods, and sharing
its experience with others for the welfare
of the general community. Its future is
limited only by the imagination of its
staff, the leadership of its Board, and
the support of its community.

3

�the
of
report
medical director
JOSEPH S. A. MILLER, MD.

This will be my last Annual Report as
Medical Director of Hillside Hospital.
When I came to Hillside in 1947, there
was a one-half time Assistant Medical
Director, six Residents, one and a half
social workers, no psychologists, and
only a fair complement of nurses and
attendants. There were eighty-eight patients. There was no out-patient department, and only the beginnings of an
after-care program. There was no organized research. The teaching was carried on by the Medical Director and by
members of the Medical Board.
From about 1948 on, the services and
facilities of the hospital began to grow.
The new Lowenstein Pavilion was
opened in 1949 and practically doubled
the bed capacity. The number of Residents was increased to twelve and, in
addition to a full-time Associate Medical Director, Staff or Supervising Psychiatrists were added. More attention
was now paid to the discharge and rehabilitation plans and, with the interest
and support of the Federation of Jewish
Philanthropies, with whom we had just
become affiliated, we enlarged our
Social Service Department. In 1951,
we began a small out-patient clinic and
also improved the services of our aftercare clinic. With the construction of the
Elizabeth Sloman Lowenstein Building
in 1954, the small out-patient clinic was
developed into a service able to treat
some two hundred patients twice weekly.

That year, also, the Israel Strauss

Pavilion for Adolescent Girls was established. Supervised clinical training and
teaching of the Residents was enhanced;

teaching in basic clinical psychiatry,
clinical diagnosis and psychotherapy
was extended; regular stated clinical,
diagnostic and discharge conferences
were instituted; and we appointed special instructors to give didactic instruction in psychopathology and psychotherapy.
1951 saw the beginning of organized
research at Hillside with a biochemistry
research laboratory set up under Dr.
Werbin. He was succeeded in 1954 by
Dr. Harry Goldenberg, who now heads
our Bio-chemical Research Department
and who has made some original contributions which have been recognized
and supported by grants from the
United States Public Health Service and
by funds from our own Board of
Trustees.
The largest contributions in the ﬁeld
of organized research were made in the
area of experimental psychiatry, especially electroshock therapy and tranquilizers, headed since 1954 by Dr. Maximilian Fink.
There have been other signiﬁcant
changes and trends. First of all there
has been a change in the type of mental
patient coming to the hospital. Our patients now are of the borderline-psychotic type, although they still fall generally within the qualiﬁcations for voluntary admission. There has been a deﬁnite drop in the average age of the patients from the mid-thirties to the midtwenties. Signiﬁcant, this year was the
replacement of the insulin coma treat-

ment by the tranquilizer, chlorpromazine. We also improved and enlarged
our occupational therapy and group activity services, and, under the able direction of Dr. Aaron Stein, our group psychotherapy programs. Our out-patient
services, ably directed by Dr. Robert
Luttrell, and our community mental
health clinics, with support from the
New York City and Nassau County
Mental Health Boards, have been regarded as models of clinic operation.
Our attending psychiatrists, notably

Drs. Martin Orens and Abraham
Lenzner, have contributed greatly to the
teaching and clinic conferences. At the
close of the year a well-deﬁned program
for the out-patient treatment of school
age children was completed.
The Israel Strauss Adolescent Pavilion completed 4 years of operation. The
experiences gained there will mean not
only an improved teaching and treatment program, but also, in the not too
distant future, a worth-while research
program.
Our Resident Training Program has
maintained its high standards, but has
pointed up the need for more in-hospital or on-the-premises teaching and clinical supervision. This in turn has called
for a larger number of better qualiﬁed
supervising or staff psychiatrists, a call
we have begun to meet.
We have been aided to a generous
extent by National Institutes of Mental
Health in receiving a number of training grants for our Residents and teaching grants for our special instructors.
There is a need for a more comprehensive research program involving projects which will deal, in a more integrated fashion, with the physical, mental and ecological factors in development
and treatment of emotional disorders.
The Journal of Hillside Hospital has,
under the able direction of its editor-inchief, Dr. Sidney Tarachow, achieved a
national reputation in scientiﬁc circles.

�In the decade since Hillside joined
the family of Federation, we have beneﬁted not only from their planning and
other special committees, but even more
from the association with Federation’s
hospitals and agencies in common purposes. Mt. Sinai Hospital provided us
with space for processing and interviewing patients in our after-care clinic for
discharged patients. Since 1950, we
have had a rich and fruitful liaison with
the Jewish Community Services of Long
Island, through which we have been
able to establish supervised psychiatric
services as well as a very worth-while
family care or foster home program for
our discharged mental patients. This
program resulted in our winning the
Milton Weil Award from Federation in
1955. As soon as the Long Island Jewish Hospital had begun its operations,
we helped establish their psychiatric
service. We are indebted to them for
their outstanding help. Mention ought
to be made here too of our help from
the Federation Employment Service,
and our dual participation in a vocational rehabilitation program with the
Altro workshops. I want to mention also,
our ever-friendly relations with the Jewish Family Service, who have not only
provided ofﬁce space for our Social
Services Department in Manhattan, but
have also been cooperating with us in a
long-range case work guidance program
for our discharged patients.
In these days of the “open hospital”
and the establishment of psychiatric
services and out-patient clinics in general hospitals, the question arises about
the future of the separate or special
mental hospital. The answer is that there

will always be patients who will require
in-resident therapy in a controlled therapeutic environment. The small psychiatric hospital need not be separated—
indeed it should work in close relationship with the community and its hospitals, institutions and agencies. Hillside
will become more and more of an open
hospital in the modern sense, depending
largely upon the education of, and acceptance by, the community. However,
within the framework of its special treatment, teaching, and research services,
it ought to remain as far as possible,
autonomous. The mental hospital provides the essentials for the emotional
re-educative process in which the patient is able to re-live and review his
earlier and unsuccessful relationships.
He learns to become a better functioning part of the new and smaller society
of the hospital, and this in turn ﬁts him
for better or improved adjustment in
the larger society outside. The small
mental hospital employs facilities for

more individualized treatment—where
he may be observed in his behavior
toward others and taught how to live
with them, and how to exploit his own
personality assets.
Fortunately for Hillside, my successor, Dr. Lewis L. Robbins, has a rich
background of professional experience
in teaching, treatment, research and
administrative ability. His views and
attitudes in regard to the special mental
hospital—the types of psychiatric and
other professional personnel needed,
the hospital environment and the various adjunctive needs of the patients—
are salutory and knowing.
I close my ﬁnal report on Hillside
with the utmost conﬁdence in the future
that awaits this great institution. I am
proud of the many achievements made
during my stewardship. It is needless

to state that this could not have been
done except with the help of a marvelous staff as well as the cooperation of
the Medical Board and the Board of
Trustees. My thanks to all the professional staffs and employees of the hospital, and especially the heads of departments. And I want especially to thank
my two “Chief Lieutenants” who
worked with me for the good of the
hospital and contributed so much to its
success during the past decade: Dr.
Simon Kwalwasser, Associate Medical
Director and Mr. Maurice Bachrach,
able and talented Administrator. I greet
Dr. Lewis L. Robbins, with whom it is a
pleasure to have been thus brieﬂy associated in the common venture at Hillside, and who, I am sure, will raise the
hospital standards and services to even

greater heights.
Although this is my last Report on
the Hospital as Medical Director it is
not really a “bill of divorcement”. I am
happy and proud to have been asked to
continue as a general consultant to the
Hospital, and as a special instructor to
the Residents. I cannot close on a better
note than by greeting the more than a
hundred Residents who trained under
me during these past'12 years. Hillside
can well be proud of them, scattered as
they are over the United States, and
contributing, wherever they are, to the
treatment, teaching and research aspects
in the ﬁeld of psychiatry based on their
early training and treatment experiences
of their Alma Mater—Hillside.

�the
of
report
President of the
Medical Board
ROBERT A. SAVITT, M.D.

6

During the past year the Medical Board
has continued to function actively in its
role as an advisory and consultative
the
and
Director
Medical
the
to
group
Board of Directors. Through its standof
which
comprised
committees
are
ing
the various echelons of the attending
staff, the Board is directly involved
in all of the medical activities of the
hospital.
The Credentials Committee for the
Supervising and Resident Staif under
the chairmanship of Dr. Roose, has
spent countless hours interviewing and
processing applicants for psychiatric
residency training. Over a period of
collected
is
on
information
being
years
the method of choosing residents. It is
expected that when this is collated and
correlated, it will yield valuable guide
the
for
criteria
in
determining
posts
choice of psychiatric personnel.
As in previous years the residency
training program continues to be a
major interest of the Medical Board. In
this connection Dr. Arnold Eisendorfer’s committee has held periodic conferences with Dr. Miller, the Medical
Director, in order to further advance
the means whereby Hillside will become
accredited for a three year residency.
One of the important recent advances
in resident education and training has
come by way of the revised group psychotherapy program. This is expertly
directed by Dr. Aaron Stein and coordi-

nated by Dr. Samuel Orgel.’s committee.
Better liaison has been established
between the psychiatric attending staff
and the hospital’s adjunctive services.
Dr. I. Peter Glauber and his colleagues
are formulating a series of conferences
and lectures which will increase the
mutual exchange of educational and scientiﬁc information with the Psychology
and Social Service Departments.
Under the superb guidance of its editor, Dr. Sidney Tarachow, the Journal
of the Hillside Hospital has expanded
its circulation and widened its scientiﬁc
achievement in this country and abroad.

Currently, several manuscripts are

being carefully considered by the Publications Committee for selection in the
projected Hillside Hospital Monograph
Series.
On the basis of liaison agreements
entered into during the past year with
our neighbor, Long Island Jewish Hospital, a Psychiatric Service has been
established at that hospital. It is being
administered by Dr. Samuel Lehrman
of our Board in collaboration with a
number of additional psychiatrists from
our attending staff.
The Adolescent Pavilion has raised
many provocative questions and problems which are gradually approaching
resolution. It is expected that our experiences will serve as points of orientation
and enlightenment for other psychiatric
facilities dealing with the treatment of
adolescents. Dr. Margaret Fries and her
co-workers are elaborating a method of

organizing clinical data which will be
of great value in the study of adolescents, is expected to ﬁnd a place in the

total resident educational program

throughout the hospital.
The Medical Board activities also
reach out into the community of which
Hillside is an integral part. Many of its
attending psychiatrists render valuable
service to the Queens Out-Patient Clinic
and the Manhattan After-Care Clinic in
terms of training and supervision of
the
in
and
colleagues,
presenyounger
tation of periodic clinical conferences.
The Israel Strauss Memorial Lecture
has become a notable yearly medical
event which attracts a large audience
from the psychiatric and related scientiﬁc professions. The annual Hilda
Strauss Mental Health Lecture has also
reached deeply into the local community’s stream of mental hygiene activities.
It is with deep regret that the Board
reports the loss of its beloved member,
Dr. Sidney Klein. He died in August
1958, and left behind a legacy which exempliﬁed his love and loyalty to Hillside. Under the terms of his will this is
to be devoted to special studies in child
and adolescent psychiatry. A suitable
memorial in his honor is being planned.
I wish to express my deepest appreciation to my many colleagues on the
attending staff, to the Medical Director,
the Director of Professional Services,
to the Board of Directors and those too
numerous to mention, for their cooperation and devotion to Hillside Hospital.

�report of the
President of the
Board of Trustees
ALVIN E. COLEMAN
A milestone in the 31 year history of

Hillside Hospital was the appointment
of the internationally known psychiatrist, Dr. Lewis L. Robbins, as Director
of Professional Services. At the same
time that Dr. Robbins is helping us to
look ahead, he has helped to put the
current program of the hospital in a signiﬁcant perspective. Our prime object
is the continued improvement of the
quality of the treatment available to our
patients, and the scope and value of
the knowledge that we are able to
impart under our teaching and research
programs.
Each year it seems more evident that
the future of the treatment of mental
disease rests in the ability to conduct
extensive research in order to learn
entirely new methods. We are fortunate
to have on our staff capable and farseeing men who are leading us along
challenging pathways to the future.
During 1958, a Department of Medicine, headed by Dr. Arnold Blumberg,
was added to the research program. The
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, headed by Dr. Maximilian Fink,
did some outstanding work in the ﬁeld
of electroshock and tranquilizer drug
effects upon the patients’ personality
and behavior. The U. S. Public Health
Service allocated a 5 year grant of

$268,000 for this department and
appointed Dr. Fink to serve as a consultant to the Council of the National
Institute of Mental Health, which itself

passes upon applications for grants from
those working in this ﬁeld. Four pharmaceutical houses, Bristol Laboratories,
Wyeth Laboratories, Smith, Kline 81
French, and Geigy Chemical Company,
provide ﬁnancial grants for further detailed study of how the new psychotropic
drugs affect human behavior.
The general use of insulin as a mode
of treatment was discontinued because
it has proven to be too hazardous for
results obtained and that the same or
similar results are now apparently
available through the use of new drugs.
The Department of Biochemistry,
headed by Dr. Harry Goldenberg, made
substantial progress in further studies
based upon the premise that mental
illness is accompanied by metabolic and
other biochemical defects which can be
detected. Dr. Goldenberg’s work, too,
has received considerable recognition
by the U. S. Public Health Service in
the form of substantial public grants.
Further plans for the modiﬁcation of
the building and the treatment program
are now being studied. Six new ofﬁces
were added to the pavilion for adolescent girls at a cost of $35,000.
A joint psychiatric service with Long
Island Jewish Hospital, our neighbor,
was established through the appointment as Chief of this service of Dr.
Samuel Lehrman, Attending Psychiatrist of Hillside and a member of our
Medical Board.
Through the aid and encouragement
of the Nassau County Mental Health

Board, it was decided to open a Child
Therapy Unit in April, 1959. This will
be 50% supported by funds from Nassau County.
During 1958, Hillside received a
number of important bequests including
the balance of the funds left to it under
the will of the late Edwin Elson, our
former Trustee; the total of this bequest
was $52,000. We also received $20,000
from the estate of Dr. S. Klein, who had
for many years been a valued member
of our Medical Board; and $37,950
from the estate of Wilhelm Levinger,
brother of our beloved former Trustee,
Alfred Levinger, who had been one of
the founders of this hospital. We were
awarded a grant by the U. S. Public
Health Service of $150,000 toward the
minimum required sum of $300,000 for
the construction of a building to be
used solely for research in mental
health. One of our ever-loyal and generous trustees, Mr. Si Scheuer, made it
possible for us to promptly qualify and
accept this muniﬁcent grant by himself
giving us $50,000 towards the construction of this building, which will be
knOWn as the Scheuer Building for
Research.
A 75th birthday was celebrated by
one of our most distinguished trustees
who has done so much for the Hospital
by making possible the magniﬁcent
facilities it now enjoys, namely our
Honorary Chairman, Leon Lowenstein.
We all wish him many more happy
birthday anniversaries.

7

��N 1958, there

342 patients who had
this
Hillside
themselves
treatment.
admitted
to
numHospital
Of
for
voluntarily
ber, 211 were new admissions, and 131 were readmitted patients of whom 27
I

were

had previously received treatment at Hillside.
the
Included
in
males,
236
106
the
342
female
females.
were
patients,
0f
total are the 23 girls admitted to and treated in the Adolescent Pavilion.
The average daily census of patients was 195; and the average stay of each

‘

i

.‘

‘

9..

’v;'r‘{1

'v:

.2»

‘

.

-

“Amway-713w

v

,,

.

patient was for 196 days.
Upon discharge front the hospital, a patient’s condition is evaluated on a
he
when
behavior
mental
his
and
basis:
enthe
status
in
diﬂerence
comparative
tered the hospital, and when he left.
The ﬁve categories are listed below, (ﬁgures in parentheses indicate the number of patients who left Hillside in 1958)
Unimproved (41): no change in condition.
have
still
but
been
alleviated
persist
problems
or
Improved (137): symptoms
to an appreciable extent.
Much improved (134): symptoms have disappeared and the patient seemed
in good condition while hospitalized; however there is no certainty as to his behavior when he returns to his normal environment at home and at work outside

of the hospital.
Recovered (24). the prognosis is that the patient will be able to return to
his social and working community and function as well, or better than he did
before he became ill.

Without Mental disorder (5) Qied (1 )

OSPITAL

‘

�STAFF EXECUTIVES
Abraham Levine, Ph.D.
Sylvia Markham, M.A.

Leonette Vanderhost, M.A.

Director,
Psychology
Dept.
Associate
Psychologist
Senior
Psychologist

treatment
psychotherapy
and medical services
The center and core of the treatment
program at Hillside is psychotherapy.
The ability of the patient to beneﬁt considerably from psychotherapeutic treatment in this area is one of the main
criteria for admission. The patient must
voluntarily admit himself and be in an
early and incipient stage of mental illness. (The long-term, chronic case,
requiring custodial care, is referred to
other institutions.)
The Hillside patient has thus been
selectively admitted, receives psychotherapy a minimum of three times a
week. In addition, patients participate
in group therapy, and all of the other

accepted modern therapies, activity

therapy, occupational, creative and recreational, drug therapy, and milieu
therapy.
é

10

_

/

s

..

.4

.

Each team of psychiatric, nursing, social service and other professional personnel of Hillside Hospital meets regularly to pool its
knowledge to help its patient along the road
to mental health.

psychology

department

The department continued to make its
contribution to the understanding of a

In the concept of milieu therapy, the
whole life of the patient in the hospital,
including associations and activities are
designed to facilitate his treatment. The
therapeutic program thus changes as
the patient changes.
To conduct this extensive program,
Hillside utilizes a “team” approach integrating the skills of the specialists on its
staff, under the general supervision of
the medical director.
Leader of the team is the psychiatrist
who is assigned to a patient upon admission, and who remains in charge of the
patient for the duration of his stay.
Working closely with the psychiatrist,
and coordinating the efforts toward the
mental health and welfare of the patient
are consulting psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurses, occupational
and creative therapists, psychiatric
social workers and psychiatric attendants.
The team concept is a broad one, and
under it conferences are held at which
are presented initial diagnosis of newly
admitted patient; periodic reports on
status of patient and his response to
treatment; pre-discharge consultation
and rehabilitation, or after-care plans.

patient’s strengths, weaknesses, and

highly complex psychic states by means
of psycho-diagnostic examinations.
Objective results obtained through
these tests have been helpful to the hospital staff in delineating a history of
conﬂicts, defenses, personality. The tests
help to reconstruct and chart the patient’s life to show what forces were at
work to bring him to the hospital. They

provide much informative material

needed to plan treatment.
Psychological tests are administered
upon admission and before separation
from the hospital. Last year 541 tests
were administered to hospitalized
patients and out-patients.
Expansion of the department has
made possible the inclusion of a vocational counseling program. This program has been especially helpful in
developing a placement program within
the hospital where a patient may acquire
work experience that helps prepare him
for the future when he leaves the hospital and returns to his community.
In 1958, a doctoral candidate from the
Department of Psychological Foundations and Services at Teachers College,
Columbia University participated in the
psychological counseling program.

�STAFF EXECUTIVES
Mrs. Goldie Krupa
Miss Nancy Jeffries
Miss Jean Hendry
Miss Helen Schippincase

Miss Eleanor MacPhillips
Miss Flora McCartney
Mrs. Alice McDonough
Mrs. Edna Telesca

Director of
Nurses
Assistant
Director 0 f
Nurses
Nursing
Instructress
Day
Supervisor
Afternoon
Supervisor

Night
Supervisor
I ntra-M and
Clinic Nurse
Departmental Secretary

nursing department

intramural clinic
This department maintains the patient’s
physical health and cares for his non-

psychiatric medical needs. Frequent

consultations are held between Hillside’s staff and the Intramural Clinic’s
specialists to integrate the mental and
physical treatment programs.
Under the direction of Hillside internist, Dr. Arnold C. Blumberg, the Intramural Clinic handled 2184 patient visits
in 1958. The greatest number of patient
referrals to Clinic specialists, were in the
ﬁelds of Internal Medicine, closely followed by Opthamology, Dermatology
and Gynecology.
Important services also were rendered in Orthopedics, Otolaryngology,
Proctology, Surgery, Urology, Neurology, Podiatry and Radiology. Plans
have been made for the Intramural
Clinic specialists to take an active part
in a psychiatric training program for
non-psychiatric physicians.

Last year an In-Service Training Program for registered nurses was instituted. The program, which consists of
lectures by psychiatric supervisors and
doctors, has been of tremendous value
to the nursing staff. Knowledge gained
and shared has enabled the nurses to
perform more effectively to the beneﬁt
of the patients and the hospital.
The policy of conducting ﬁeld trips
through the hospital for students from
Central Islip and St. Vincent’s Schools
of Nursing was continued.
In addition, during 1958, for the
third consecutive year student nurses
from Queens College received their psychiatric nursing experience at Hillside.
F orty-four students participated in the
teaching-working program.
The training program for psychiatric
aides was recognized by the Queens
County Mental Health Society, which
presented awards and certiﬁcates of
honorable mention to four aides trained
by the Nursing Department. The awards
were made to focus public attention on
the important role played by the indispensable psychiatric aides, who contribute so much to the patient through
their interest, kindness, attention and
skill.

department of
dentistry
Approved by the American Dental
Association, it is the oldest intramural
department in the hospital. Its staff of
10 dentists, directed by Dr. Paul Scheman, last year received 1112 visits and
rendered professional services in orthodontia, periodontia, restorative dentistry and oral surgery and X-ray.
New dental equipment acquired in
1958 made it possible to vastly improve
the dental care to patients.
Members of the department frequently appeared before dental organizations
to read papers and give lectures on
methods of treating dental patients with
emotional problems.

‘

;

I

11

�O. T. STAFF EXECUTIVES
Director
Eileen P. Fisher
Joseph C. Chase
Senior
Occupational Therapist
Adult-Section
Esther Burack
Senior
Occupational Therapist
Adolescent Pavilion

occupational
and creative therapy

12

Two adjunctive services at Hillside, which make an
important contribution to the patient and staff are the
Occupational and the Creative Therapy departments. Each
of these departments has a speciﬁc function, and each is
prescribed as a regular part of
treatment in cooperation with the
psychiatric staff.
The OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY department, which is a member of the treatment team, performs
a dual function. It provides a program under which a patient can
work in various handicrafts, which
offer a creative outlet that increases
his self-conﬁdence. It also helps the
psychiatric staff by reporting on the
patient’s attitudes and reactions
while he is so engaged.
From these reports, which detail
responses to success or failure with
a project such as weaving, jewelry
making, ceramics, the psychotherapist gains further insight
to his patient not only at work, but also in his relationship
with others in the group.
In 1958, the department had maintained a close association with the hospital team. Occupational therapists attended meetings three times a week to contribute their
knowledge of a patient, and also submitted regular progress
reports to the psychiatric staff.
The addition of one therapist to the staff during the
year made possible the initiation of an occupational
therapy program right in the patient’s room. This enables
the therapist to reach a more disturbed patient more quickly
and to give him more individual attention.
At year’s end, a new prescription form was devised to
effect an even closer working relationship between the

C. T. STAFF EXECUTIVES
Director
Dr. Ernest Zierer
Creative Therapy
Associate
Edith Zierer

Director

doctor and the occupational therapist. The form contains
pertinent information which provides a direct guidance
line and a higher degree of integration between the psychiatrist and the occupational therapist, indicating areas of
concentration that will be most helpful to the patient.
CREATIVE THERAPY at Hillside is a specialized form
of art therapy devised and developed by Dr. Ernest Zierer.
Department Director and his associate, Mrs. Edith Zierer.
This therapeutic and psychodiagnostic tool involves the administration of a series of painting tests
that reveal a visual expression of
the patient’s attitudes toward recurrent life situations.
This unique program furnishes
a “personality profile” of the
patient. This proﬁle supplies the
psychiatric staff with documented
ﬁndings delineating the patient’s
stress and frustration tolerances,
strength of motiﬁcation, actual and
potential functional capacity and
his ability to “integrate” into the
societal structure.
During the year, an average of
49 patients took part in the program daily and a total of
1640 tests were administered.

adolescent pavilion
STAFF EXECUTIVES
Dr. Alice Stahl, Director
Dr. Zenos M. Linnell, Supervisor
Dr. Eugene Glynn, Director of After-Care Clinic
Dr. Sidney L. Green, Consultant
Mrs. Kathleen Cliggett, Head of Nursing
Mrs. Sylvia Riback, Senior Social Worker

The Israel Strauss Adolescent Pavilion, now in its ﬁfth
year, was a pioneering venture of Hillside Hospital. It was

1.

2;

�set up to treat and rehabilitate adolescent girls who need
hospitalization for emotional problems during a most crucial transistory period of their lives.

Hillside Hospital, in venturing into this hitherto
neglected ﬁeld, recognized that adolescence is an ideal

time to employ the knowledge and skill of modern psychiatric care to help young people when help can be decisive.
The Pavilion provides individual psychotherapy, milieu
therapy, a school program, a group
activities program and nursing care
for girls between the ages of .13 and
17. It also conducts an intensive
social work program with the families of all patients to create a healthier climate and better understanding at home, of the girls’ problems.
The 23 patients admitted to the
Pavilion in 1958 remained in the
hospital for an average of 315 days,
as compared to the 182 days for
adults. The conditions range from
transient behavior problems to the
major psychoses.
The staff includes a supervisor,

three resident physicians, three

registered nurses, two social workers, two school teachers,
a group activity worker, an occupational therapist and 16
psychiatric aides.
The patients live in a two-story building that includes
all therapy facilities, studio-type bedrooms for two girls,
dining rooms, lounge and recreation areas.
The girls, however, attend school classes in another
building to simulate as much as possible the atmosphere
of “going to school”. As soon as they are able to, girls
are
encouraged to join in recreational activities outside their
own group in the Pavilion.
There have been two notable advances during the
year.
The ﬁrst is a more structured and individualized
program.
Under this program the group work department offers a
.

variety of activities and each patient is required to sign
up for two of those activities. The structured program
helps the patient to do what she cannot do for herself.
The second advance has been to use the concept of
individual and group responsibility to foster growth.
Housekeeping duties have been assigned to girls and the
relationship between various privileges and the patients’
readiness to exercise self control has been stressed.
As the Pavilion gains wider recognition among members of the

4"

psychiatric profession, greater

numbers of referrals continue to
come in from distant parts of the
country.
However, to maintain its high
standard of individual attention,the
Pavilion restricts its patients to 16
at any given time.
The operation of the Adolescent
Pavilion is in conformance with
the basic thesis of Hillside Hospital; early treatment for those mentally ill patients who can beneﬁt in
a relatively short period of time.
Even though the adolescent years
are directly related to the Hillside orientation, it was
obvious at the time the Pavilion was set up, that the adolescent years are the “difﬁcult years.” This period of greatest individual change also is the period about which
relatively little is known to the psychiatrist.
Five years of treatment of adolescent girls have resulted
not only in the improvement of the patients involved but
also have led to insights and approaches to modiﬁed and
new treatment concepts. These results already have been
applied to adolescents, as well as young adults.
Follow-up studies of discharged adolescent patients
presently are being conducted. In summary, the operation
of the Adolescent Pavilion has provided an exciting area
for a combined treatment and research project.
i

13

�CASEWORK DIVISION EXECUTIVES
Abraham Lurie
Director, Dept. of
Louise Pinsky
Sylvia Solovey
Sylvia Riback
Seymour Silverberg

Social Service
Department
casework division

14

The Social Service Department is the
hospital’s most direct link between the
patient and his family.
The department’s function is to help
the patient and his family cope with
the personal, social and economic problems caused by the illness.
It helps a patient come into the hospital, to stay in the hospital by working
with the family members in an effort
to relieve pressures on the patient, and
ﬁnally, to leave the hospital, and return
to a good home climate. This is accomplished by participating directly and
actively in the planning that concerns
the patient.
To accomplish this, in the course of
1958, the Casework Division of the
Social Service Department conducted
11,593 interviews with patients, (including those in the Adolescent Pavilion
and the Out-Patient Department) and
their families. There were, in addition,
10,517 telephone contacts with relatives
of patients.
This represents an increase over last
year’s ﬁgures because a drop in median
age of patients, to include many more
teenagers, made it necessary for social
workers to spend more time with
patients and their families. About 35%
of the adult patients admitted in 1958 to
the hospital are between the ages of 17
and 25. This is due to two principal factors: the policy of selecting patients in
the early stages of mental illness, and
also the fact that young people are more

Social Services
Assistant Director,
in charge of
Casework
Supervisor
Supervisor
Executive Director
of the “Bridge”

likely to seek hospital help when they
are mentally ill. (Older people frequently reﬂect social taboos concerning
this type of hospitalization.) The preponderance of young people has
changed the social structure of the hospital in many ways including such things
as the types of group activities.
In 1958, a more intensive effort was
also made to screen the 790 male and
1220 female applicants to determine
those who could best beneﬁt from the
treatment of the hospital, prior to their
screening at the clinic.
Collaborative relationships with social agencies were continued. One of the
most active joint programs was with
the Jewish Family Service, which permits discharged patients who need further counseling to get immediate help.
At the close of the year, 18 patients
(and their families) were receiving aid.
Though still a pilot project, this two
year old program offers considerable
promise for further expansion.
Nineteen patients were placed during
the year through the F oster Home Program, conducted jointly with the Jewish
Community Services of Long Island.
This extremely active and important
program beneﬁts those patients who,
which
home
have
to
discharge
no
upon
to return, or who should not, for their
well-being return to the same environment in which they lived before admission to the hospital.
An invaluable service, which, on occasion, makes possible the hospitalization

of a mother, is the Homemaker Service,
conducted with the cooperation of the
two aforementioned Jewish agencies.
This service, supplied to temporarily

motherless children, enables the

mother-patient to derive maximum

beneﬁt from therapy by freeing her
from worry about the care of her children. In 1958, 10 families were helped
over this particularly difﬁcult time
through this program.
The Altro Workshop, in the East
Bronx provides transitional employment to discharged patients and was
used by 13 patients during 1958. The
work
gainful
providing
by
program,
in a protective shop where each employee works at a rate of speed that does
not tax him, makes it easier for the

�ex-patient to eventually resume normal
employement in the community.

The Federation Employment and
Guidance Service, the New York State
Employment Service and the Division
of Vocational Rehabilitation have continued to cooperate to the fullest in
helping patients secure job placement
soon after leaving the hospital.
The school program provided by the
New York City Board of Education was
particularly signiﬁcant in 1958 because
of the large number of young patients.
Sixty-two patients under the age of 21,
who had not yet completed their high
school educations were enrolled; 17
were graduated, and six patients passed
their high school equivalency examina-

tions.

The mental patient, unlike the general hospital patient, usually requires
longer care and long-time follow-up
after discharge. These social service
programs indicate Hillside’s recognition of this fact, and the hospital’s community responsibility to provide leadership and coordination of other agencies
who could help in the continued care of
mental patients during, and after hospitalization. Thus, dozens of private
agencies (particularly those afﬁliated
with the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies) and public agencies are able
to pool their resources.

work
division
group
The Group Work Division, under the
direction of Arnold Eisen, focuses on

the re-socialization of the patient,
re-orienting him to group living. The
patient is helped to function in an improved manner with his family, friends,
employer, fellow-employees and the

community in general.
A major change in 1958 has been the
increased development of community
links and a closer coordination with the
Casework Division.
During the year this division developed a number of new services, programs, ideas and approaches:
The New Patients Orientation Group,
formed to soften the impact of hospitalization on a new arrival and to supply
factual, comforting information to help
alleviate fears.

Development of Community Program Resources, under which community agencies open their doors to
patients on speciﬁed occasions. Trips
have been made to YMHA, YWHA,
YWCA and YMCA branches in Manhattan, Jamaica and North Hills.
Special Cooperative Services with
Community Agencies:
In cooperation with the Federation Employment and Guidance Service, Group
Vocational Guidance sessions were held
to discuss the job market, stimulating
patient interest in the post-discharge
period. Under the Discharge Plan expatients returned to the hospital to tell
patients of their experiences at the postdischarge social rehabilitation center,
the Hillside League. This has been most
effective in relieving separation anxiety.

Joint Patient-Family Programming is
an outgrowth of Field Days, at which
both visitors and patients participate
in recreational activities. As an experiment, patients were permitted to invite
members of their families to a dance at
the hospital. The success of this social
event has resulted in planning of other
joint events in the future.
Internal Programming in 1958 was
responsible for establishing several
additional lounges, dance therapy,
English lessons for foreign-language
speaking patients, and other similar
programs. A weekly newspaper, edited
and published by the patients is now
available in addition to their quarterly
literary magazine.

15

��.,

~

g

_

f

TAk

7.,

.

a

u,

1

.«f

~

.

. I

‘

1..

.

.

e.

.

at.

5,.

w

.,

,

&gt;11.

.K

.,,

.

.

m

7
.

,i

.

.m.«:,

¢

,

.

..

L
.

.w

.

.

.

m

k

.

v

.

.
¢iyu§$ta$ﬂw€u1qﬁm

.

.

\

_..

sub

A

w

~

m

.

.

v-

4%

..

.

A.

f,
.

.

is»

n

,

N

.

,

‘

g

.

‘

‘

.

/

,

_

«JD,

.
.

.

m

a a

h

.,

.

.

1:

,

..

2

I

1:“

K,

ﬂ

-

w

a

_

,.

x

.

.
.

V

.

.

\
g

_

.

.,

.

.
_

.

.

W

I
K

I

.

.

u

‘

.

.

&lt;

l

V

m

.

q
v

I

.

.

_

.

~
v.
..

o

.

.

.

:8

,
;

‘

V

.

‘

.

.P
A

‘

v

�L

,

Bid-"“1

'

.

Gﬁ'emiggry

R5e'sea-rqh:

Fé‘llby’ﬁ

Adjupptjve"

'
’

I

,

',

Therapies

v

V

'

"'

VCI'mlc'al
'

‘

V

SoCi’al

swipes

�‘

”

BOARD

'

;‘

COMMITIEES:

Medical Advisory Board

.

7,

Outside/Affiliations f

‘

Dietary

AVDM-IvNiS-TR'ATI'VE‘ SERV‘IQE

'

As'sT.
ADMINISTRATOR
‘

ADMINISTRATOR

Buildings
Grounds

_

Department

.

Auditing

Secreta rial

0“.

Pool»

Finance

Budgets
Diets
Menus

Dayshift
Night Shift
.,

rchasing
Inventory

Cleaning

1

P_u

1?

Linen

Decorating
Sto res

.- 7 ChefsStaff
"
.

Water
Gas
Heat
Buildings

~

Kitchen
Dining Rooms
”Po rters
Storekeeping

’

Payrblls
Reports

Construction
.Ma'i nte n anee

Craftsmen

Porters
Attendants

’La'bo‘re'rs

Gardeners.

Linen Room

Engineers

Laundry

‘

'

‘

.

Typing.

Personnel
Supplies
Purchases

~'

'7

.

Medical

Budgetary
Control

‘

Reports
0

_

'

.

Mail Room

_

Communications

-'

,

'1

.

Medical"

_

Statistics

'Grougnds

Maids

..

gitceou»nts._

:

'

i=Bookkee‘pers‘iv~
.
‘

,Audito rs
'QI e rks

Secre'ta ries

'
Q,

.'

Typists

-

Receptionist
Telephone
Operators ‘

Typing Pom

Trucks“

Cars

Gatem’en

security

A.

.4..._.

n
a

em.

Hillside Hospital a nd.
its Patients
.

_

'

��STAFF EXECUTIVES
Director of Out-Patient Services
Robert R. Luttrell. MD.
Assistant Director of
Robert Navarre, M.D.
Out-Patient Services
Miss Sylvia Solovey
Mrs. Joan Weisman
Mrs. Anne Wexler
Mrs. Ida Baumstein
Mrs. Estelle Pitts

Manhattan
after-care clinic
The Manhattan After-Care Clinic,
located
is
at
week,
ﬁve
a
nights
open
Mt. Sinai Hospital, a convenient location for most discharged patients. It
assists the Hillside discharged patient
to resume his role in the community
and to deal with the immediate problems of job adjustment and resumption
of old environmental contacts.
Approximately 30 patients are seen
twice Weekly in an effort to bridge their
adjustment from the hospital setting to
the community setting. The treatment is
intense but brief.
The importance of this Clinic cannot
be underestimated because this helps
people who come to the clinic to avoid
readmission to the hospital. If they can
be helped during the ﬁrst few months,
their chances of adjustment in the community are greatly improved. Group or
individual therapy is provided, depending on the needs of the patient.

Israel and
Hilda Strauss League
The Israel and Hilda Strauss League
is an organization maintained for the
social rehabilitation of former patients
of Hillside Hospital.
Situated in quarters at 231 West 83rd
Street, Manhattan, the League furnishes
a meeting place for social and recreational purposes. A lounge is equipped

Supervising Social Worker
Sta]? Psychologist
Caseworker
Caseworker
Caseworker

Queens

out-patient service

with a record player, radio, television,
magazines and table games.
Its existence is made possible through
the devotion and unﬂagging efforts of
a group of women volunteers from the
community who sponsor the League by
raising funds and by offering personal
services. The group name “The Bridge”,
is symbolic of the purpose of this volunteer organization; $30,000 was raised

last year by “The Bridge” for the

League.
A former Hillside psychiatric social
worker, Seymour Silverberg, is assigned
as a full-time director of the League. He
is available for individual consultation
and referral service relating to housing,

employment, further treatment and
other personal welfare problems.
Active membership in the League is
now 366, an impressive growth compared to its start in 1954 with 38 members. Devoted volunteer participation
has kept pace with the membership.

The Queens Out-Patient Service was
established to help the emotionally
disturbed person before his mental
health problems grow and require hospitalization.
Psychotherapy is offered to residents
of Queens, Nassau and Suffolk Counties who require treatment but cannot
assume the economic burden of private
care. Selection is made on the same
basis as that for in-patients: patients
suffering from acute emotional illness
are selected after careful screening to
determine their likelihood of responding to intensive treatment of a year or
less, based on twice-a-week visits.
In 1958, 33 psychotherapists worked
on a part-time basis to treat 306 patients
in individual psychotherapy and 30
patients in group therapy sessions.
Usual length of treatment consisted of
eleven months. Of the 306 patients
treated, 156 were patients admitted to
the Clinic in the previous year, and 150
were new patients. To select the 150,
222 patients were fully screened by
social workers, through psychological
tests and interviews with psychiatrists.
Statistics, however, do little to reveal
the amount of anguish and tension successfully resolved. They must be translated into the numbers of families kept

together, the jobs saved, the fears
allayed.

�Training programs
Hillside’s Resident Training Program

continues to emphasize the interrelation
between the training program and the
treatment program.
In 1958, there were 20 Residents in
training. Each Resident carried a case
load of about 15 patients under the
supervision of staff and visiting instructors. In addition, he atttended lecture
conferences conducted by the medical
director.
Instructors from the Medical Board
conducted lecture and reading seminars
in the ﬁelds of psychopathology and
psychotherapy.
Qualiﬁed Residents were assigned to
the Department of Experimental Psychiatry for clinical and other psychiatric research projects. Seven student
case workers from three schools of
Social Work were assigned to the Casework Division of the Social Services
Department; and six graduate students
received training in the Group Work
Division of the Department.

The training programs extend to
Clinical Assistants in the Out-Patient
and After-Care Clinics and on-the-job
training of personnel. Regular lectures
and conferences are scheduled for
psychologists, nurses and attendants,
social workers and members of the variOUS adj unctive services.

Israel Strauss lecture
The Annual Israel Strauss Lecture,
established in 1955 in honor of the
founder and late President of Hillside,
was delivered in 1958 on April 20. The
speaker was Dr. Paul H. Hoch, Commissioner of New York State Department of Mental Hygiene. His subject
was The Open Hospital.

Sunday clinical
conferences
The Sunday Clinical Conferences,
open to and attended by psychiatrists
and other professional personnel and
by outstanding visiting physicians are
part of the Resident Training Program
and are based on cases prepared by the
Residents. They make a signiﬁcant contribution to the training programs in
the ﬁeld of psychiatry in the metropolitan area.

Medical library
The Arany Lorand Memorial Library
with Miss Rosalind Lazarus as Librarian continued its rapid expansion program. During the year, 470 books and
monographs were added, and 110 periodicals subscribed to. The personal library of the late Dr. Sidney Klein was
incorporated. A generous bequest of
Joseph Meyer was applied to the psychiatric collection. A gift in the name of
Dr. Attlio Laguardia was used to augment the teaching collection.

l

19‘

��-

‘

,

».

V

,

ESEAR CH at Hillside Hospital
is a multi-disczplined combined approach of biochemists, chemists, physicists,
psychologists, psychiatrists, sociologists and statisticians. Even though the treatment program at Hillside is psychoanalytically oriented, the hospital recognizes
that every approach must be explored and utilized in order to increase knowledge
and improve the therapy of mental patients.
Serious mental illness, with all its disruptive influences, today touches one
family in three, since one person in 10 requires hospital treatment for a psychiatric disorder at some time during his life.
Hillside believes that the mental health problem requires a total approach,
and that progress in the treatment of the mentally ill depends vitally on a program of intensive, never-ending research.
A staﬁr of scientists and trained researchers is constantly engaged in the
laboratories, in a program of test-tube probing into the mental health program.
Research goes on at Hillside on three fronts: in the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, in the Department of Biochemistry and in the Department of
Medicine.

ESEAR0

�STAFF EXECUTIVES
Director
Max Fink, M.D.
Research Associate (Psychiatry)
Joseph .laf’fe, M.D.
Research Associate (Psychiatry)
Donald F. Klein, MD.
Sr. Research Associate (Experimental Psychology)
Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Research Associate (Experimental Psychology)
Max Pollack, Ph.D.
Research Associate (Sociology)
Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.
Research Assistant (Experimental Psychology)
Eric Karp, B.A.
Associate in Research (Neurophysiology)
Martin A. Green, MD.
Associate in Research (Psychiatry)
Abraham A. Kaplan, MD.
Barre Alan, M.D.
Henry Lefkowitz, M.D.

TECHNICAL STAFF

Fellow (1 957-58)
Fellow (1958-59)

Mrs. Janet Bowie
.lean Kolodny

Hannah Mosquera
Blanche Zaitz

experimental
psychiatry

22

During 1958, the major emphasis of
the staff of the Department of Experimental Psychiatry shifted from the evaluation of convulsive therapy to systematic investigations of newer drug
therapies.
These investigations were based on
the theories developed in the Department in 1957, which derived from the
successful evaluation of the mode of
action of convulsive therapy. Studies
were conducted on measures of speech
behavior developed in the Department
during 1956 and 1957. In an extension
of the communication studies, the language indices were applied to drug
therapy.
The evaluation of convulsive therapies was continued in 1958, by comparing the effects of indoklon, an inhalant
convulsant, with electroconvulsive therapy. Results indicated that while the
indoklon worked, it was a poor substitute for ECT. The study was important because it illustrated graphically
that the convulsion was the important
factor, not the electrical stimulus.
Investigations into the relations of
sociologic factors to the selection of
therapies at the hospital showed that
not only were the factors of age, education and birthplace signiﬁcantly related
to the choice of therapy, but these factors were also related to the results of
therapy, the diagnosis and the duration
of hospitalization.
Similar studies of the population of
other primarily psychotherapeutic hos-

pitals, and the Hillside Out-Patient
Clinic were also undertaken. A grant
from the Mental Health Board of Nas-

sau County helped support and augment these studies.
The acute drug interviews were but
One aspect of the continuing evaluation
of the biochemistry of convulsive therapy.
Other research projects during the
year consisted of perceptual studies in
patients receiving psychodynamic therapies; the inter-relation of psychotherapy with physiodynamic therapy; and
the inter-personal factors in therapists,
as well as patients, leading to the referral for physiodynamic therapies.
Three members were added to the
staff during the year, and the department received support through continuing grants of the Foundations’ Fund
for Research in Psychiatry, the National Institute of Mental Health, the Psychopharmacology Service Center of the
National Institutes of Mental Health, the
Mental Health Board of Nassau County;
and from Bristol; Geigy; Smith, Kline
81 French; and Wyeth Laboratories.
Staff members were honored with
two awards: Dr. Maximilian Fink received the ﬁrst annual A. E. Bennett
Psychiatric Research Award of the Society of Biologic Psychiatry for his report on the effects of anticholinergic
agents on EEG and behavior; Dr. Joseph

Jaffe received the Cralnick annual
award for his report on the application
of analysis of changes in formal aspects
of speech in psychotherapy.

department of
biochemistry

The Department of Biochemistry,
headed by Dr. Harry Goldenberg as
Director and Dr. Vivian Fishman as

Senior Biochemist showed a major

growth during 1958, with the assistance
of three research grant awards from the
National Institutes of Mental Health.
The laboratory staff was increased to
seven members to make possible more
intensive fundamental biochemical studies as well as the initiation of several
collaborative clinical projects.
The change in the hospital treatment
program from shock therapy to chemotherapy introduced new problems which
required laboratory assistance.
As an aid to the drug therapy program, toxicological tests were set up to
detect various pharmaceutical preparations in body ﬂuids. The laboratory was
called upon periodically during the year
to conﬁrm suspected drug intoxication.
A chemical study was carried out
with Dr. Arnold Blumberg, of the Department of Medicine to assess the prognostic signiﬁcance of the physiological
response to mecholyl. While this study
was in progress, it was noted that mecholyl triggers the release of adrenaline
in the urine, as well as smaller amounts
of related substances. In connection with
adrenaline studies it was observed that
preferential excretion of adrenaline
occurred in normal subjects in the laboratory following the induction of a
stress reaction with the drug LSD.
Maj or emphasis in the laboratory continued on the premise that mental disease is accompanied by detectable
chemical changes in the body. Blood
and urine studies were undertaken to
determine whether there is any correlation between body chemistry and the
various psychiatric disorders.
Studies were also continued on enzyme systems concerned with the elimination of toxic substances from the
body.

�Intensive studies were also made to
demonstrate metabolic defect in the

liver whereby toxic substances are

formed but not eliminated at a sufﬁcient rate to maintain sanity.
At Hillside, it is felt that a balanced
biochemical program, involving both
chemical and other fundamental studies
will best serve the present and future
welfare of the hospital. Inter-departmental clinical studies help to bind the
various hospital activities into one fabric; and the theoretical studies provide
more lasting insight into the physical
aspects of mental disease, whose corrective treatment offers a more lasting support to psychotherapy.

medical
department
As new drugs are introduced into the
treatment of emotional disorders, studies of the basic physiology open new

vistas in the understanding of the pathology of mental disease.
During 1958, the Medical Department under the direction of Dr. Arnold
C. Blumberg collaborated with the Department of Biochemistry on studies of
the inter-relation of the adrenaline system and emotional disease.
All patients on drug therapies were
screened and medically controlled by
the Medical Department. Toxic reactions to the drugs were carefully scrutinized and a report on the hypotensive
response to toxic doses of meprobamate
were submitted for publication.
Alterations in liver function with the
phenothiazine derivatives were also observed in cooperative studies with the
Department of Biochemistry.

�Hillside
publications
During 1958, the Hillside Hospital Staff
made numerous appearances as guest
lecturers and speakers at conventions
in this country and abroad.
They appeared before major national
professional societies, as well as before
lay groups.
In addition to national and local societies, reports on hospital programs
were presented at conferences in Rome
and Montreal.
Staff members reported on therapy
and research in a large number of professional publications, and in the
Journal of the Hillside Hospital.
FINK, M.: Lateral Gaze Nystagmus as an

Index of Sedation Threshold, EEG. Clin.
Neurophysiol. 10: 162-163.

FINK, M.: Effect of Diethazine on EEG and

Signiﬁcance for Theory of Convulsive Therapy, EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 10: 207-208

(Abst.).

FINK, M.: Effect of Anticholinergic Agent,

Diethazine, on EEG and Behavior, A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psych. 80: 380-388.

FINK, M.: Effects of Anticholinergic Agent,
Diethazine, on EEG and Behavior: Signiﬁ-

cance for Theory of Convulsive Therapy. Presented at the Society of Biological Psychiatry,
May, 1958 in San Francisco.

24

FINK, M.: Role of EEG Frequency Shift in

Behavioral Effects of Drugs. Presented at
Section on Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., Queens County
Medical Society, June, 1958 in New York.

FINK, M.: Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post Convulsive EEG and Behavior. Presented at the American EEG Society, June, 1958 in Atlantic City.

FINK, M., SHAW, R., GROSS, G., COLEMAN, F.C.:

FINK, M.: EEG and Behavioral Effects of

Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psycho

M.: Clinical and EEG.
Effects of Megimide in Patients without Cerebral Disease, Neurology 8: 682-685.

FINK, M., GREEN, M. A.: EEG Correlates of

Signiﬁcance of Individual Variability in EEG Changes During Electroshock
Therapy. Presented at the Eastern Association
of Electroencephalographers, March, 1958 in
Montreal.

Psychopharmacologic Agents. Presented at

Pharmacologicum, September, 1958 in Rome;
and also at the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, December, 1958 in New
York.

the Electroshock Process. Presented at the
Eastern Psychiatric Research Association,
February, 1958 in New York.
FINK, M., GREEN, M. A.: Electroencephalo-

graphic Correlates of the Electroshock Process, Dis. Nerv. Syst. 19: 227 (Abst.).

FINK, M., JAFFE, J.: Drug Induced Changes
in Interview Patterns. Presented at the Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic,

and Sociologic Aspects of the Neuroleptic
(tranquilizing) Drugs in Psychiatry, April,
1958 in Montreal.

Comparative Study of Chlorpromazine and
Insulin Coma Therapy of Psychosis, J .A.M.A.
166: 1846-1850.

GREEN, M., FINK,

GREEN, M. A.:

A.: Relationship between Seizure
Threshold and Duration of Seizures to EEG
Change During Electroshock. Presented at
the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, December, 1958 in New York.

GREEN, M.

H.: Chairman of Symposium on
Catechol Amines. Held at the New York
Academy of Sciences, October, 1958.

GOLDENBERG,

H.: Biochemical Aspects of
Mental Disease. Presented at the Jewish
GOLDENBERG,

Chronic Diseases Hospital, Brooklyn, New
York in February, 1958.

FINK, M., KAHN, R. L., GREEN, M. A.: Experi-

GOLDENBERG,

FINK, M., KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M.: Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences in Behavioral Response to Convulsive

H., BLUMBERG, A. G., GOLDENBERG, V.: Inﬂuence of LSD and Vasotonic
Drugs on Urinary Excretion Patterns. Presented at the 125th Meeting of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science,
Washington, D.C., December, 1958.

FINK, M., KAHN, R. L.: Experimental Studies
of the Electroshock Process, Dis. Nerv. Syst.
19: 113-118.

H., GOLDENBERc, V.: Urinary
Excretion of Aromatic Metabolites in Mental
Disease. Presented at the 125th Meeting of
the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., Decem-

mental Studies of Convulsive and Drug Therapies in Psychiatry: Theoretical Implications.
Presented at the Neurological Society and
New York Society of Clinical Psychiatry,
March, 1958 in New York.

Therapy. Presented at the American Psychiatric Association, May, 1958 in San Francisco.

FINK, M., KAHN, R. L., GREEN, M.: Experi-

mental Studies of Convulsive and Drug Therapies on Psychiatry: Theoretical Implications,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psych. 80: 733-734
(Abst.)

H.: New Analytical Procedures
Based on Dye Partition Analysis. Presented
at the Long Island Jewish Hospital, New
Hyde Park, New York in March, 1958.
GOLDENBERG,

GOLDENBERG,

ber, 1958.

H., WHITE, D. L.: Standardized
Method for the Assay of Serum Oxidase Activity (Ceruloplasmin) , Clin. Chem. 4: 551, 1958.
GOLDENBERG,

�Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the
American Association of Clinical Chemists,
Iowa City, September 1958.
V.: Colorimetric Determination
of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives as Hydroxamic Acids, Anal. Chem., 30: 1327, 1958.
GOLDENBERG,

GOLDENBERG,

V., GOLDENBERG, H.: An Im-

proved Method for the Estimation of Serum
Copper, Clin. Chem. 4: 551, 1958. Presented
at the 10th Annual Meeting of the American
Association of Clinical Chemists, Iowa City,

September 1958.

J., KAHN, R. L., FINK, M.: Communication Patterns with Altered Brain Function. Presented at the Eastern Psychological
Association, April, 1958 in Philadelphia.
JAEEE,

J., SLorE, W. H.: Interpersonal F actors in Denial of Illness, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
81
Psychiat. 80: 653-656.
JAFFE,

.IAFFE,

J.: Language of the Dyad, Psychiatry

21: 249-258.

F INK, M.: Changes in Language
During Electroshock Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communication, Hoch, P. and
Zubin, J., Eds., Grune 81 Stratton.
KAHN, R. L.,

M.: The Relation of F
Score to Behavioral and Physiological Response with Altered Brain Function. Pre-'
sented at the Eastern Psychological Association, April, 1958 in Philadelphia.
KAHN, R. L. FINK,

KAHN, R. L., FINK,

M.: Prognostic Value of
Rorschach Criteria in Clinical Response to
Convulsive Therapy. Presented at the Electroshock Research Association, May, 1958 in
San Francisco.
KAHN, R. L., POLLACK,

M.: Socio-Psycholog—
ical Aspects of Diagnosis and Treatment:
Theoretical Implications. Presented at the
Symposium—Eastern Psychological Association, April, 1958 in Philadelphia.
KAHN, R. L., POLLACK,

M.: Social Factors
in Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital. Presented at the American

Psychiatric Association, May, 1958 in San
Francisco.
KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M.:

Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in Convulsive Therapy. Presented at the Eastern
Psychiatric Research Association, October,
1958 in New York.

H.: Intensity of Stimulation and Perception of Simultaneous Stimuli in Cerebral
Dysfunction. Presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, April, Philadelphia.
KORIN,

LEVINE, A.:

A Comparative Evalution of

Latent Schizophrenic and Overt Schizophrenic Patients with Respect to Certain Personality Variables, J. Hillside Hosp. 7: 131-152.

P.:

Oculomotor
and Postural Patterns in Schizophrenic Children, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 81 Psychiat. 79:
POLLACK, M., KRIEGER, H.

720-726.

Predictions of Outcome, in Youthful Offenders at Highﬁelds, Weeks, H. Ashley, Ed. U. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
SIECEL, N.:

L.: Juvenile Delinquency. Presented to the Sociology Department at Hofstra College on November 26th, 1958.

VANDERHOST,

Hillside Journal

POLLACK,

The Journal of the Hillside Hospital showed
once again an increase in the number of its
subscribers as an indication of its greater
inﬂuence and wider acceptance in the psy—
chiatric and related ﬁelds. In this country
and throughout the world about 1200 copies
are subscribed for by medical schools, training hospitals, social service agencies and
many institutions in other countries, particularly Israel.
In 1958, 15 major articles by members of
the Hillside staff and by other professional
contributors, were published in four issues.
Contributions come from various parts of the
US. and especially the West Coast.
The Journal offers an unusual feature by
reporting clinical conferences in full including the entire discussions. Now in its 7th
year the Journal is still under the able leadership of Dr. Sidney Tarachow.
The Editorial Advisory Board consists of
Morris B. Bender, M.D., Dudley D. Schoenfeld, M.D., and Sandor Lorand, MD.
The Associate Editors are Renato Almansi,
M.D., Abraham S. Lenzner, M.D., Samuel R.
Lehrman, M.D., Joseph S. A. Miller, M.D.,
Aaron Stein, M.D.

POLLACK, M., BATTERSBY, W. S., KAI-IN, R. L.,
BENDER, M. B.: Intellectual Deficits in Pa-

Grants and Awards
Received 1958

LEVINE, A., HARRIS, J., CAMINSKY, I., LURIE,
A., BACHRACH, M., MILLER, J.: An Explora-

tory Vocational Counseling Program in a
Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 7: 153-161.

5.: Pathological Reactions in
Women After Parturition. Presented to the
Department of Obstetrics at St. Albans Naval
MARKHAM,

Hospital on December 13th, 1958 in New
York.
S.: The Dynamics of Post-Partum
Pathological Reactions as Revealed in Psychological Tests, J. Hillside Hosp. 7: 178-189.

MARKHAM,

POLLACK, M.: Visual

Perception and Attention in Normal and Abnormal Children. Presented at American Orthopsychiatric Association, March, 1958 in New York.
M.: A Critique of “Pre-Conscious”
Perception and the “Poetzl Phenomenon”.
Presented at the American Psychiatric Association, May, 1958 in San Francisco.
POLLACK,

M.: Brain Damage, Mental Retardation and Childhood Schizophrenia, Am.
J. Psychiat. 115: 442-428.

tients with Space Occupying Lesions of the
Cerebrum. Presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, April, 1958 in Philadelphia.

........
Foundations Fund for Research
U. 5. Public Health Service

in Psychiatry

..................

$74,460
16,250

25

�«saw».

�report of the administrator
“Kim.

MAURHIIBACHRACH

The 1958 Annual Report strikes a new note which reﬂects
the tremendous strides that are being made in the ﬁeld
of mental health. The hospital’s operations during 1958
were effected by the profound changes which came with
the introduction of the psychotropic drugs. Chemotherapy
has enabled us to entirely discontinue Insulin Shock Therapy and is reducing the use of Electro Shock Treatment
to a point where it may soon be eliminated. These changes
produced certain changes in our expense picture, in that
the cost of giving the physical therapies, which are being
abandoned, is reduced. But, there are attendant increases
in costs for drugs and, more importantly, a need for expansion of personnel in the adjunctive and activities

therapies.
Another profound inﬂuence is introduced by the
Professional Department program which our Director of
Professional Services, Dr. Lewis L. Robbins, had recommended at the end of 1958. It is almost certain that the
implementation of these recommendations including, as
they do, a considerable increase in the number of full time
Staff Psychiatrists, as well as expansion of the Social
Service, Occupational Therapy, Psychological and Group
Activities Staffs, will change our expense picture considerably, although they may have no impact on the 1958
experience as such.

Comparison of Costs 1957-1958
1957

Salaries .......................................... $855,848
Food .............................................. 119,350
Maintenance and Grounds ............ 62,654
Administrative Expenses .............. 98,952
Medical Supplies .......................... 29,811
Repairs and Replacements .......... 49,021
Clinics ............................................ 280,056
Total ................ $1,495,692

1958

$936,330
127,142
72,049
108,693
31,997
48,101
337,712
$1,662,024

The above table shows that the total cost for the entire
Hillside Hospital complex increased by 11% during 1958.
One-half of this total increase occurred in salaries which
increased by 9%. This is in keeping with our experience
for the past ten years, where salaries have been increasing
steadily at the rate of seven to ten percent per annum due

largely to the need of the Hospital to keep pace with the
increasing cost of living. Very little, if any, of this increase
during 1958 can be ascribed to additional staff. The largest percentage increase, 21%, was in the cost of Out-Patient
Services. This reﬂected a combination of increased costs
and continued expansion of clinical work from Out-Patient
Services, but this should be contrasted with the 307(increase in the cost of Out-Patient Services during 1957.
This indicates that although our Out-Patient Services are
still expanding, the rate of expansion is slowing down.
The other items, food, maintenance and grounds, administrative, medical supplies and repairs and replacements,
increased by varying amounts, but they are all in keeping with the general picture of roughly 1071 increase for
all expenses.

Service Statistics

1957
Total Number of Patients ........................ 545

Total Patient Days .................................. 69,987
Average Income per Patient Day ............ $15.57
Average cost per Patient Day .................. $17.37
Average loss per Patient Day .................. $ 1.80

1958
536

70,691
$16.58
$18.73
$ 2.15

The data given in the above table refer to ln-Patients
only.

The total number of patients treated and the number
of patient days show no signiﬁcant change over 1957.
The average income per patient day as well as average
cost per patient day increased with costs rising faster than
income, so that the average loss per patient day rose from
$1.80 to $2.15, an increase of 16%. The reason for this
increase in the average loss per patient was that, although
there was a slight increase in average income per patient
day, all of this increase coming from fees paid by patients
or the patient’s family, the per diem rate paid by the City
of New York remained the same during 1958, in spite of
increased costs.
Our research programs continued to expand with a
concurrent increase in cost; but these increases were almost
entirely absorbed by increased support by the National
Institutes of Mental Health, so that deficits arising out of
research operations were held to a relatively modest ﬁgure,
$35,000, which was made up by the Board of Trustees of
Hillside Hospital.

27

�Financial Support Picture
Hillside Hospital has been fortunate over the years
in the support it has received from the Federation of
Jewish Philanthropies. Year after year, since 1948, the
Federation has carefully reviewed the Hospital’s fees and
supplied a grant which was always consonant with the
Hospital’s deﬁcit requirements. Our gratitude to the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies is profound and we hope
that we will continue to deserve the support of the Jewish
Community, as it is expressed through the Federation.
We have received legacies from time to time, and as
our reputation and tradition grows, these are becoming
.increasingly more. The following is a list of legacies
received by the Society of the Hillside Hospital from 1948
to 1958. It is interesting to see that each year the number
and amounts of these legacies is growing. We hope that
a larger and larger number of persons who desire to beneﬁt humanity and especially to bring about some amelioration of the suffering of the mentally ill, will ﬁnd it possible
to name Hillside Hospital as a beneﬁciary in their Wills.
Amount
Simon Lefcort ................................ $ 2,000
Leonora Solinger Baum ................ 23,317 (A)
Florence Tim .................................. 1,000
Rose Simon ....................................
456
Max Richter .................................... 5,000
Solomon Rothfeld .......................... 10,000

Harry T. Epstein ............................

8,835
250

Year

1948
1949-1958
1949
1949
1950
1950
1952
1953

Beatrice S. Bowman ......................
1953
Aaron C. Horn ................................ 3,000
Flora Haas ...................................... 60,000 (B)
1954
250
Dora Monness Shapiro ..................
1955
Robert L. Leeds .............................. 2,500
Charles Benoff ................................
1956
380

28

Max Einhorn .................................. 77,155
897
Julius Grossman ............................

1956

Hermenia Goodman ...................... 2,000
Christine King ................................ 1,058
Wilhelm Levinger .......................... 37,950
Joseph Meyers ................................ 2,500 (C)

1957

Notes: (A) Approximately $2,300 per year in perpetuity
(B) Restricted for care of Adolescent Girls
(C) Restricted for Medical Library

1957
1958

1958
1958

During 1958, the following persons other than
Trustees made gifts to the Hospital as noted below:
Amount
Bernard M. Baruch, Jr ......................................... 3 500.00

Bristol Laboratories .............................................. 2,500.00
Grand Street Boys Foundation ............................ 675.00

Jack Bleibtreu ........................................................ 185.00
Wyeth Laboratories .............................................. 1,500.00
Lightolier .............................................................. 1,000.00
Susan Greenwall Foundation ................................ 200.00
Smith, Kline

81

French Laboratories .................... 2,500.00

Gustave Levy ..........................................................
Edward Goldberger ................................................
Alfred Hazan ..........................................................
J. A. Samuels ..........................................................
Gaisman Foundation ..............................................
Laurence Alexander ..............................................

100.00

500.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
150.00

William J. Hammerslaugh .................................... 500.00
Henry Homes ........................................................ 1,000.00
l.M.M. Charities .................................................... 500.00
Carol B. Loeb Foundation ...................................... 1,000.00
Blanche Ittleson ....................................................
Blanche Freeman ..................................................

100.00

Sylvia

100.00

Krohn

.............................

100.00

Arabel Foundation ................................................ 1,000.00
Eugene Blum .......................................................... 4,000.00

Edward L. Fabian .................................................. 5,000.00
Geigy Chemical Corp ............................................. 5,000.00
Lawrence Mark ...................................................... 100.00
Louis Neiweg .......................................................... 1,049.00
Samuel Silverman .................................................. 200.00
Our gratitude to these benefactors is of course profound. It is our hope that as our work becomes known
to a larger and larger circle of interested individuals, they
will send us gifts for the support of our work.

��Director, Israel Strauss
Adolescent Pavilion
Alice Slater Stahl, M.D.
Supervising Psychiatrist,
Israel Strauss
Adolescent Pavilion
Zenos M. Linnell, MD.
Director, half—time,
Adolescent After Care Clinic
Eugene Glynn, MD.

Society
of the

Hillside
Hospital
Officers
President

Alvin E. Coleman *

Chairman of the Board
Roy Foster*
Honorary Chairman of the Board
Leon Lowenstein*
Vice-President
Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.*
Vice-President
D. Herbert Beskind *
Vice-President
George W. Galinger*

Secretary
Manuel Lee Robbins*
Treasurer
Arnold S. Askin *
Assistant Secretary
A. Jacob Abrams
Assistant Secretary
M. Victor Leventritt
Assistant Treasurer
Arthur Garson
Assistant Treasurer
Harry Silverson
Honorary Directors
Hilda Strauss and Saul Blickman

Board of Trustees
A. Jacob Abrams

Jonas AdlerT
Alfred Appel
Arnold S. Askin*
John M. Bendheim
D. Herbert Beskind*
Saul Blickman

30

David BunimT
Alvin E. Coleman*
Martin ColemanT
Morris David
Thomas Epstein

Arthur C. Fatt*
David Finkle
David Finn

Director of Out-Patient Services
Robert R. Luttrell, MD.
Assistant Director of
Out-Patient Services
Robert Navarre, MD.

Director of Research in
Experimental Psychiatry
Maximilian Fink, M.D.

Roy Foster*
George W. Galinger*
Arthur Garson

Maurice Glinert
Meyer Goldstein
Jacob Epstein Katz
Carl L. Kempner‘l'
Harold P. KurzmanT
M. Victor Leventritt
Budd Levinson
Morris L. Levinson
Milton B. Loeb
Sandor Lorand, M.D.
Leon Lowenstein*
Charles H. Meyer*
Arthur Murray
Manuel Lee Robbins*
Irving Rosenbaum
S. H. Scheuer*
Walter Scheuer
Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.*
Harry Silverson
Hilda Strauss
Irving Weisglass
Nathan Wigod
Morton 5. Wolf*
Walter D. Yankauer*

Chairman of Standing
Committees
Executive Committee
Roy Foster
Medical Affairs Committee
D. Herbert Beskind

Finance Committee
Arnold S. Askin
House and Grounds Committee
George W. Galinger
Nathan Wigod, Co-Chairman
Legal Committee
Charles H. Meyer
Social Service Committee
Hilda Strauss, Honorary Chairman
M. Victor Leventritt, Chairman

Personnel Committee
Meyer Goldstein

Internist

Arnold G. Blumberg, MD.

Director of Laboratories
Harry Goldenberg, Ph.D.

Resident Staff

Nominating Committee
Walter Yankauer
Gifts and Legacies Committee
Walter Yankauer
Committee on
Administrative Savings
Arnold S. Askin

Building Committee
D. Herbert Beskind 81
George W. Galinger,
Co-Chairmen

*—-Executive Committee Members
f—Elected in I958

Professional and
Administrative Staﬁ'
Medical Director
Joseph S. A. Miller, MD.

Director of Professional Services
Lewis L. Robbins, MD.
Associate Medical Director
Simon Kwalwassr, M.D.

Administrator
Maurice Bachrach, B.S.
Supervising Psychiatrists
George Yessin, M.D.
Gerhard Schauer, M.D.
Harold Esecover, M.D.*
William Benjamin, M.D.
Morton Wachspress, MD.

Norman Ackerman, M.D.**
Barre Alan, M.D.
Reva Berstock, M.D.
Bernard Cohen, M.D.**
Warren Cox, M.D.**
Alan Dobrow, M.D.
Necdet Ecder, M.D.
Elhan Ermutlu, M.D.**
Marie Friedman, M.D.**
Michael Gould, M.D.**
Sherwin Harris, M.D.
Raymond Hollander, M.D.
Doris Kells, M.D.
Edwin Kleinman, M.D.
Henry Lefkowits, M.D.
Sidney Lytton, M.D.
Stanley Machlin, M.D.
Harvey Mandel, MD.
Robert Nodine, M.D.**
Paul Pressman, M.D.**
Henry Rosett, M.D.
Alvaro Rozo, M.D.
Mollie Schildkrout, M.D.
Jack Schnee, M.D.
Herbert Schulman, MD.
David Steinman, M.D.
Carl Towbin, M.D.
Margery Wile, M.D.

Other Prof esional
Staff Heads

Director of Nursing
Goldie Krupa, R.N.
Director of Social Services
Abraham Lurie, M.S.S.W.
Director of Psychology
Abraham Levine, Ph.D.

�.
.W.

&lt;|

',

Psychiatrists

afﬁx]

.4;

Director of Creative Therapy
Ernest Zierer, Ph.D.

Director of Occupational Therapy
Eileen P. Fisher, B.S.
Director of Group Work Division
Arnold Eisen, M.S.S.W.
Dietitian
Angelina Canavan, B.A.

Supervisor Clinical Laboratory
and X-Ray
John Croghan, R.T., M.T.

Department Heads
Accounting Supervisor
Dorothy Croghan

Manager
Lillian Dailey
Superintendent of Buildings
&amp; Grounds
Thomas R. Lumley
Executive Housekeeper
Sarah Travers
Oﬂ‘ice

*—Resigned in 1958
**—Completed residency in 1958

Medical Board
President
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.*
Vice President
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.*
Secretary

Sidney L. Green, M.D.*

Treasurer
Paul Scheman, D.D.S.*
Est-President
M. David Epstein, M.D.*

Manhattan After-Care Clinic
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.

Samuel Atkin, M.D.
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.*
M. David Epstein, M.D.*
Margaret E. Fries, MD.
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.*
George S. Goldman, M.D.
Sidney L. Green, M.D.*
William Karliner, M.D.*
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.
Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Sidney Klein, M.D.iL
Samuel R. Lehrman, M.D.
Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.
Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.*
Lawrence J. Roose, MD.
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.*
Martin Schreiber, M.D.*
Isidor Silbermann, M.D.
Otto Sperling, M.D.
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.*

Consulting, Attending and
Visiting Staffs

Non-Psychiatrists

Psychiatry

Director of Department
of Medicine
Lester Cohen, M.D.*

Leonard Blumgart, M.D.
Sandor Lorand, M.D.
Irving J. Sands, M.D.l~
Nathaniel E. Selby, M.D.
Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.

Director of Department
of Surgery
Sidney Hirsch, M.D.*
Director of Department
of Dentistry
Paul Scheman, D.D.S.*

Chairman of Standing
Committees
Adolescent Pavilion
Sidney L. Green, M.D.
Credentials Committee for
Psychiatric Attending
Staﬂ &amp; Promotions
Martin Schreiber, M.D.
Credentials Committee for
Non-Psychiatric Visiting
Staff &amp; Promotions
Paul Scheman, D.D.S.
Education of Resident Staﬂ
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.
Group Psychotherapy
Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.

Queens Out-Patient Clinic
Martin H. Orens, M.D.

Sub-Committee for Child
Guidance Clinic
Isidor Bernstein, MD.
Research Committee
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.
Publications Committee
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.
Committee for
Adjunctive Services
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.
Credentials Committee for
Supervising Psychiatric
and Resident Staﬂ
Lawrence J. Roose, M.D.
*—Executiue Committee Members
i—Deceased in 1958

Medicine
Alfred Angrist, M.D.
Morris S. Bender, M.D.
Oscar Levin, MD.
I. Jesse Levy, MD.

Neurology
A. M. Rabiner, M.D.

Hans Strauss, MD.
I. S. Wechsler, M.D.

Surgery
David Warshaw, M.D.

Gynecology
Julius Jarcho, M.D.

Dentistry
Morris Fierstein, D.D.S.

Attending Psychiatrists
Samuel Atkin, M.D.
Frank Berchenko, M.D.
Isidor Bernstein, MD.
Arnold Eisendorfer, MD.
M. David Epstein, M.D.
Margaret E. Fries, MD.
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.
George S. Goldman, MD.
Paul Goolker, M.D.
Sidney L. Green, M.D.
William Karliner, M.D.
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.
Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Sidney Klein, M.D.T
Attilio LaGuardia, M.D.TT
Samuel R. Lehrman, M.D.
Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.
Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.
Lawrence J. Roose, MD.
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.
Martin Schreiber, M.D.
Isidor Silbermann, M.D.
Otto Sperling, M.D.
Aaron Stein, M.D.
Sidney Tarachow, MD.

Associate Attending

Psychiatrists

Renato J. Almansi, M.D.
Alexander J. Friedman, MD.
5011 Goodman, M.D.
Louis Kaywin, M.D.
Bruce Kendall, M.D.
Abraham S. Lenzner, M. D.
Martin H. Orens, M.D.
William W. Pike, M.D.
Geraldine Pederson-Krag, M.D.
i—Deceased in 1958
H—deceased I959

31

�Visitings

Optometry

Medicine

Staff Optometrist
Edward L. Steinberg, OD.

Director
Lester Cohen, M.D.

Staff Optometrist
Bernard Attinson, OD.

Visiting Physician
George Sabrin, M.D.
Visiting Physician
Louis Rosenblum, M.D.

Podiatry
Staff Podiatrist
Sam Sokolov. Pod.O.

Visiting Physician
Arnold G. Blumberg, M.D.

*—Resigned in 1958

Associate Physician
Jerome Weinstein, M.D.

Clinical Assistants in
Manhattan and
Queens Clinics

Adjunct Physician
Arnold L. Berger, M.D.
Adjunct Physician
Wilbur B. Brett, M.D.
Visiting Dermatologists
Conrad Stritzler, M.D.*
Associate Dermatologist
.loel Schweig, M.D.

Adjunct Dermatologist
Norman Goldfarb, M.D.

Neurology
Adjunct Attending
Psychiatrists

32

Edward R. Adelson, M.D.
Herman S. Alpert, M.D.
Alvin B. Balaban, M.D.
Irving L. Bauer, M.D.
Benjamin J. Becker, M.D.
Julius Belinkofi, M.D.
Milton M. Berger, M.D.
Lionel H. Blackman, M.D.
Isadore H. Cohn, M.D.
Irving J. Crain, M.D.
Joseph H. Feldman, M.D.
Jules Glenn, M.D.
Albert E. Goldberg, M.D.
Albert Harrison, M.D.
Thomas Hora, M.D.
Abraham Kaplan, M.D.
Eugene Kaplan, M.D.
George P. Krupp, M.D.
Peter Laderman, M.D.
Harold S. Leopold, M.D.
(on leave)
David Milrod, M.D.
Helene Papanek, M.D.
Irving Salan, M.D.
Frederick F. Shevin, M.D.
Jay Stanton, M.D.
Samuel Tabbat, M.D.
Fred U. Tate, M.D.
Leonard Weinroth, M.D.
Herbert Wieder, M.D.

Associate Neuroligist
Kurt Adler, M.D.

Surgery
Director
Sidney Hirsch, M.D.
Visiting Neurosurgeon
Joseph Siris, M.D.
Visiting Urologist
Daniel Kaufman, M.D.

Adjunct Urologist
Albert Sutton, M.D.
Visiting Orthopedist
A. H. Lewert, M.D.

Associate Orthopedist
Julius Schneiderman, M.D.
Visiting Proctologist
Benjamin Warner, M.D.
Visiting Ophthalmologist
Edward Seretan, M.D.
Associate Ophthalmologist
Arthur Minsky, M.D.
Visiting 0tolaryngologist
Sam Clayton, M.D.
Visiting Anesthesiologist
Georges Bean, M.D.
*—Resigned in 1958

Gynecology
Visiting Gynecologist
Marie P. Warner, M.D.
Visiting Gynecologist
Hilliard Dubrow, M.D. (on leave)

Associate Gynecologist
Jack Cohen, M.D.
Associate Gynecologist
Bernard Greenblat, M.D.

Adjunct Gynecologist
Eugene Streim, M.D.*

Radiology
Visiting Radiologist
Bernard Epstein, M.D.

Associate Radiologist
Paul Steinhorn, M.D.

Dentistry
Director
Paul Scheman, D.D.S.
Associate Director
J. Gordon Rubin, D.D.S.
Associate Dentist
Benjamin Schwaid, D.D.S.
Associate Dentist
Bernard Lebow, D.D.S.
Adjunct Dentist
Henry Lewis, D.D.S.
Adjunct Dentist
Samuel Plotnick, D.D.S.
Adjunct Dentist
Elsa Friedman, D.D.S.
Adjunct Dentist
Martin Protell, D.D.S.
Adjunct Dentist
Leon Basson, D.D.S.

Lester I. Abend, M.D.
Edward R. Adelson, M.D.
Romano Antonelli, M.D.
Howard Boskey, M.D.
Paul Bradlow, M.D.*
Stanley Brodsky, M.D.
Arline Caldwell, M.D.*
Daniel Chansky, M.D.
Lionel Chertoﬂ, M.D.
Ralph W. Clemments, M.D.
Frances Colonna, M.D.
Stefano Fajrajzen, M.D.
Irving J. Farber, M.D.
Philip Friedland, M.D.
Ruth Fuchs, M.D.
Harvey Goldey, M.D.
Sumner I. Goldstein, M.D.
Clara Gonda, M.D.
Harry Gonda, M.D.
Martin Hurvitz, M.D.
Gunthar Jacob, M.D.
Wilbur Jarvis, M.D.
Norman Levy, M.D.
Peritz Levinson, M.D.*
Zenos Linnell, M.D.
Buck Luria, M.D.
Howard Mele, M.D.
Daniel Miller, M.D.
Meyer Monchek, M.D.
Beatrice Nachtigal, M.D.
Iris Orens, M.D.
Edward Pinney, Jr., M.D.*
Phoebe Rosen, M.D.*
Joseph D. Rosen, M.D.*
Jehuda Rozanski, M.D.
Gabriel Rubin, M.D.*
Leon Tec, M.D.
David M. Tillim, M.D.
Clara Torda, M.D.
Aimee Wiggers, M.D.*
*—Resigned in 1958

��HIL LSIDE HOSPITAL

‘3

��JANUARY 1, 1960—JUNE

30, 1961

Society of the Hillside Hospital
Board of Trustees

GLEN OAKS, NEW YORK

OFFICERS
PresidentD. Herbert Beskind

Vice Presidents
George W. Galinger
Charles H. Meyer

'

S. H.

Chairman, of the Board
Alvin [3. Coleman

Scheuer

Walter

Honorary Chairmen of the Board
Roy Ecstie'r

Leon towenste‘in

Dudley‘D.-Shoenfeld, MD.

D.

Yankauer

Treasurer
Arnold .s. Askin

Assistant Treasurers
Arthur Garson
MauriCe Glinert

Secretary
Jacob Epstein Katz
Assistant Secretaries
A. Jacob Abrams
M. Victor Leventritt

M EM B EIR‘S'

A. Jaco‘b‘Abram's;

George W. G'alinger
Arthur Garson
Maurice Glinert
Meyer Goldstein"
Jacob Epstein Katz’r
Carl L. Kempner
Harold P. Kurzman
Robert L. Leeds, Jr.
M. Victor Leventritt
Budd Levinson
Milton B. Loeb
Sandor Lorand, M.D.

Jonas Adler

Alfred Ap'per
Arnold S. Askin*
John M. Bendheirn
D.

Herbert Beskind"
'

David Bunim
Alvin E. C'Ol'eman'

Martin Coleman
Thomas Epstein
Arthur C. Fatt
Roy

Foster“

Leon Lowenstein*

Charles H. Meyer
Charles Revrson
Manue‘lLee Robbins
S. H. Seheuer
Dudley D. Schoenfeld,
John W. Straus
Irving Weisglass
Nathan Wigod

M-.D.*

Morton 8,. Wolf
Adolph Woolner
Walter D. Yankauer

CHAIRME-N of STANDING COMMITTEES of THE BOARD of TRUSTEES

Executive committee
Alvin E; Coleman
Finance. Committees
Maurice Glin'ert
Sub-Committee on Investments
Adolph Woolner
Gifts &amp; Legacies Committee
Jacob E-.; Katz
-

*Executiv.e Cémmittge‘
'

”Deceased

House &amp; Grounds Committee
George W. Galinger
Nathan Wigod
Legal Committee
Charles H. Meyer
Medical Affairs Committee
M. Victor Leventritt
New Building Committee
David Bunim

Nominating Committee
Walter D. Yankauer
Personnel Committee
Harold P. Kurzman
Public Relations Committee
Arthur C. Fatt
Social SerVice- Committee
Maurice fGIin‘ert

�ever—changing approach to the treat-

President’s
Report

Hillside

Hospital was founded
in 1927 by Dr. Israel Strauss and his
colleagues of the Committee of Jews
for Mental Health, whose objective
was to provide good psychiatric care
to those who could not afford to pay
for the service. Today’s Hillside Hos—
pital is one of the few voluntary, nonprofit psychiatric hospitals in the
United States. In 1958, the Board of
Trustees determined to establish new
goals for their hospital.
Our physical size and personnel
resources anticipated recent recom—
mendations of the Joint Commission
on Mental Illness. We endorse these
recommendations and wish to participate in the solution of this major
health problem by continuing our
treatment program, by seeking an improved quality of patient care, and by
providing outstanding professional
training for doctors, nurses, social
workers and other professionals. To

accomplish these goals and to

broaden the treatment program as a
basis for fundamental research in
mental illness, Dr. Lewis L. Robbins
assumed the responsibilities of Medical Director.
Dedicated lay members of the
Board of Trustees together with the
staff and the distinguished physicians
who served on the Medical Board,
have been continually reviewing the

ment of mental illness and evaluating
new concepts of care. The character
of Hillside Hospital as a pilot institution seeking to broaden the frontiers of understanding mental illness
is now well integrated.
The years 1960 and 1961 saw the
planning of a new building program
designed to provide the physical facilities for current concepts of treatment, professional development and
research. An activities therapy build—
ing is needed to house the manifold
creative, occupational, athletic and
social activities which we know are
so vital in the treatment of our patients. Equally important, offices,
conference rooms and working areas
must be created for the broader research program which will include,
in addition to biochemical research
and experimental psychiatry, a comprehensive effort in dynamic psychiatry. Adequate residence facilities
are necessary to house our staff members. Funds toward the cost of these
physical improvements are substantially in prospect and it is entirely
possible to contemplate that construction can begin during 1962.
In this progress report of today’s
Hillside, I take great pleasure in the
accomplishment of the ﬁrst and major phase of progress toward the long
range goals we have set. The efforts,
wisdom and material support of the
trustees of the Society and the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies, and
the informed and dynamic leadership
which Dr. Robbins provides, instills
great conﬁdence that the image of
tomorrow’s Hillside will shine even
brighter than today’s.
D. HERBERT BESKIND
President, Society of
the Hillside Hospital

�Professional
and Administrative Staff
Samuel Davis
Assistant Administrator

ADMINISTRATION
Lewis L. Robbins, M.D.
Medical Director

STAFF PSYCHIATRISTS
William Benjamin, M.D.
Muriel Benton, M.D.
Max Fink, M.D.

Maurice Bachrach
Administrator

David Graubert, M.D.
Irwin Greenberg, M.D.
B. Bernie Herron, M.D.
Elsa Katz, M.D.
Donald Klein, M.D.

John c. Kramer, M.D.
Henry Lefkowits. M.D.

Robert R. Luttrell, M.D.
Robert Navarre, M.D.
Paul Salkin, M.D.
Alice S. Stahl, M.D.
Barbara Ure, M.D.
Morton Wachspress, M.D.
George Yessin, M.D.

PROFESSIONAL DEPARTMENT HEADS
ACTIVITIES THERAPIES
Morton Wachspress, M.D.

NURSING

EXPERIMENTAL

Jean Axten, R.N.
Director
Frances Anderson, R.N.
Associate Director

PSYCHIATRY

Director

Max Fink, M.D.

Eli Levy

Director

Assistant Director
Joseph Chase
Director,
Occupational Therapy

PSYCHOLOGY

LABORATORY

HarryrGoldenberg, Ph.D.
Director

Phyllis Hurteau, R.N.
Associate Director lnservice
Education

John Croghan
OUT-PATIENT DEPARTMENT

Supervisor

ADOLESCENT PAVILION
Alice S. Stahl, M.D.

MEDICAL LIBRARY

Director

James Montgomery
MEDICAL SERVICES

BIOCHEMISTRY

Arnold

Harry Goldenberg, Ph.D.

G.

Blumberg, M.D.

Director

Director

RODSrt R.

Luttrell, M.D.

DII'CCTDI'

Harvey Goldey, M.D.

Assistant Director
Hershey Marcus, M.D.
Director Child Therapy Unlt

Abraham Levine, Ph.D.
Director
CREATIVE THERAPY

Mrs. Edith Zierer

Director
SOCIAL SERVICES
Abraham Lurie

Director
Louise Pinsky
Assistant Director, Casework
Sidney Pinsky
Supervisor, Group Work
SOCIOLOGY

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.

ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT HEADS
FOOD

ACCOUNTING

SERVICE

SERVICES

Sol Fuchs

Dorothy Croghan

HOUSEKEEPING

OFFICE

BUILDINGS and

SERVICES

GROUNDS

Robert Jones

May K. Bottomley

Thomas Lumley

CLINICAL ASSISTANTS
ADULT UNIT

Nobel Endicott, M.D..

Sumner Goldstein, M.D.
Curtis. Kendrick, M.D.

Lionel Chertoff, M.D.
Ralph Colp, Jr., M.D.
Alan Dobrow, M.D.
Raymond Edelman, M.D.

Dahiel Miller, M.D.
iris Orens, M,D.

Esther Robbins, M.D.
Jack Schnee, M.D.
Maurice Shilling, M.D.
JamesWatson, M.D.

CHILDREN’S UNIT

Sidney Finkel, M.D.
John Price, Jr., M.D.
Esther Robbins, M.D.
Mollie Schildkrout, M.D.

PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENTS
Lucie Arato, M.D.
Paul Ar'onow, M.D.

Peter Ferber, M.D.

Edward Gelardin, M.D.
Seymour Gers, M.D.
WarrenH. Goodman, M.D.
Joseph Gross,'M.D.
'

‘

Edward‘s. Hartmann, M.D.
Jerome L, Jacobs, M.D;
Abraham Jankowitz, M.D.
Henry K‘aminer, M.D.
Herbert J. Levo’witz; M.D.
Arnold Lieber, M.D.
Julia Mehlman, M.D.

Herman Oliver, M.D.
Raymond W. Rakow, M.D.
Rita S. Reuben, M.D.
Ger-aid D. Roberts, M.D.
Judy M. Roheim, M.D.
Bertram H. Rosen, M.D.
Ronald'Sa‘german, M.D.

DECEMBER

George Satran, M.D.
Martin Shepard, M.D.
Herbert J. Steinberg, M.D.
Dan'ield Weitzner, M.D.
Charlotte M. Zitrin. M.D.

31,1960-JUNE 30,1961

�Medical

Director’s Report
When one considers that there

are hundreds of thousands of patients
in public and private hospitals in the
United States, one is forced to the
conclusion that this represents a tremendous waste of human lives and
community resources.
The majority of these patients are
in large public hospitals which have
been viewed by the Joint Commission on Mental Illness as too large to
provide the necessary individualiza—
tion of treatment and the therapeutic
relationships which are so important.
Hillside Hospital with its 375 admissions and discharges per year does
provide the type of treatment needed,
but the service we can give is but a
mere drop of water in the vast ocean
of human misery. It would take us
forty—ﬁve years to treat as many patients as are currently in just one of
the nearby public institutions. The
solution to the problem of mental ill—
ness does not lie in the expanding of
treatment facilities as much as it does
in ﬁnding better answers to the causes
and treatment of emotional dis—
orders, and in passing on our knowledge to all those who are needed to
treat the mentally ill.
In accordance with these principles, Hillside Hospital has chosen
to make research and training its
primary goals. As always, it continues to be a pilot institution providing
the best psychiatric treatment that is
currently available, and is constantly

trying to develop new knowledge and
to share what we learn with others.
The development of research and
education are never any better than
the clinical programs on which they
are based. Conversely clinical pro—
grams which do not include educational and research activities become
sterile.
During these past three years, our
emphasis has been on further im—
proving our clinical services and concomitantly expanding the psychiatric
residency training program.

Although there has been much

progress in the several on—going research programs, the improvements
in our clinical and educational activities should provide opportunities for
considerable new effort in this important area.
This report treats of our progress
in connection with the restated goals
of our hospital. The problems in ﬁnding solutions to the questions of mental illness are enormous, but we are
taking steps towards assisting in the
ﬁnding of needed answers. The work,
the effort, support and dedication of
our trustees and staff augur well for
the future.
LEWIS L. ROBBINS, M.D.
Medical Director

�Progress Toward
Our Stated Goals

move from closed to open units as
was previously the practice.
An open hospital has been estab—
lished. Doors are rarely locked.

I
The
therapeutic activities now
I constitute
the major
of the
part

I
Goals

are quoted from the survey and report made by Dr. Robbins
in late 1958.
TREATMENT and TRAINING
“The psychiatric hospital should
be thought of primarily in terms of
its staff and of the facilities for occupational therapy, recreational therapy, educational therapy, group living experiences and the like; as a
total community in which the bed is
used only to sleep in at night. A psychiatric hospital should be a thera—
peutic community in which every
aspect of the patient’s stay is designed
to meet his therapeutic needs. To insure the best possible results includes
not only the prescription of the speciﬁc treatment procedures mentioned
. . .and the type of therapy best suited
to meet the needs . . . but also the
‘emotional atmosphere’ in which they
are to be carried out.”

Patient care has been much more
I individualized.
staff has been reor—
I Our treatment
and

treatment teams esganized
tablished. Led by a full time senior
staff psychiatrist the team is composed of staff psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, social caseworkers,

I

group workers, psychologists,
nurses, and activities therapists.
In order to stabilize patients in re—
lation to stall, patients now remain
on the same living unit, rather than

I

patients’ program.
The treatment program has been
approved by the Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation.
A children’s outpatient clinic has
been opened.

“The patients admitted to Hillside
Hospital fall into the groups of those
patients with severe psychoneuroses,

early or incipient psychoses, and
rather severe character disorders.

Such patients require the optimum of
psychiatric talent for help and one
should be able to bring to bear in
their treatment the best skills that are
available. Even the most experienced
psychiatrists need to have the participating skill of an adequate staff both
qualitatively and quantitatively in all
the areas of psychology, psychiatric
social work, psychiatric nursing and
the adjunctive therapies.”
An Activities Therapy department
has been established.
The Occupational Therapy staff
has been increased.

I
I
Recreational Therapy staff
I The
has been increased.
has
been
A
work
patient
program
I initiated.
activities
therapy
Occupational
are
I related to work and to treatment

I
I

rather than just to arts and crafts
training.
A pilot vocational rehabilitation
program has been established with
Altro Workshops.
A program in which volunteers
plan and lead patient activities has
been established.

�“One fact which seems to work
against the success of the admission
policy is the accumulation of a waiting list for admission.”
The patient waiting list has been
eliminated.
The admission screening process
has been improved.

I
I

“The main shortage in psychiatry
today is knowledge. . . One of the
major responsibilities of every psychiatric facility is not only to provide
the best possible service to patients,
but also to train personnel. Psychiatry like all other branches of medicine, is best learned by intimate
contact with patients and with one’s
teachers, rather than in the classroom. Thus, the clinical staﬁ is simultaneously a faculty working in
close day to day personal contact
with the students The resident. . .can
only meet the clinical needs of the
patients in his care if he is given adequate supervision by more experienced teachers. The resident psychiatrist is a very busy person having on
an average twelve patients at a time
and admitting a new patient approximately every ten days. It is not possible to add some very necessary
experiences (such as outpatient psychotherapy) to the residency program
because of their already very heavy
schedules. It would be desirable to
increase the number of residents, not
only to provide training for more
doctors, but also to decrease the case—
load for each resident. There has
long been a desire to develop a full

three year residency training program at Hillside Hospital. Experi-

ence again has demonstrated that it
is better for residents to obtain all of
their psychiatric training in one place
rather than to move from place to

�place. This provides them with a
more integrated three year educational experience. Specialized experience in certain areas, such as psycho-

somatic medicine, geriatrics and

neurology can be developed through
liaison with other nearby institutions.
It is, therefore, recommended that
the excellent facilites of Hillside Hospital and its actual as well as potential relationships with other institutions be used primarily for the advancement of psychiatric knowledge.

I
I
I
I
I

The full time psychiatric staff has
been greatly enlarged.
The number of psychiatric resi—
dents has been increased.
The number of patients per doctor, and the number of residents
per supervisor has been reduced.
The quality of supervision has improved.
Residency training in psychiatry
has been approved by the American, Medical Association for three
years.

I dency training has increased qualiApplicants for psychiatric resi-

I
I

tatively and quantitatively.
The number of grants from the
United States Public Health Service for training has been increased.
Clinical training has been extend—
ed into the Adult and Children’s
Out-Patient clinics.

I been improved and increased.
of
function
Educational
voluntary
I non-paid attending staff increased.
afﬁliations
for
psychiatTraining
I ric residents established with
Formal classroom training has

I

Creedmoor, Long Island Jewish
Hospital, Monteﬁore Hospital and
Meadowbrook Hospital.
Graduate and undergraduate
training in psychiatric nursing in

I
I

afﬁliation with Queens College and
Adelphi College.

Inservice training program for
nursing personnel established.
Graduate training in Psychiatric
Social Work and Group Work in
afﬁliation with Adelphi College,
Columbia University, Yeshiva and
New York University.

RESEARCH

“A lthough millions and millions

of dollars have been spent in development of all kinds of psychiatric

facilities, only a small amount of

money has been spent in the important area of psychiatric research . . .
Far greater sums of money are being
spent for research and other illnesses
which have a much smaller incidence
than do psychiatric disorders . . . Re—
search is developed in most hopitals,
as a derivative of the clinical and educational activities in the institution
. . . investigations which must go forward on many fronts simultaneously;
physiological, psychological and social. Because man is a biological,
psychological and social being, the
ultimate.answers in respect to psychiatric illness will not be found in
any one area alone even though from
time to time one may seem more
promising than the others. Therefore, it is also encumbent upon every
psychiatric institution not only to
treat patients as well as our present
knowledge permits and to educate
psychiatric personnel, but also to
continue to investigate the nature of
psychiatric illnesses in order to eliminate many gaps in our knowledge.”

I

The research programs in experimental psychiatry, biochemistry
and medicine have been in existence for many years under the re-

�spective leadership of Dr. Max
Fink, Dr. Harry Goldenberg and
Dr. Arnold Blumberg. These programs have continued to produce
valuable achievements, some of
which are reported below. It is’
hoped that the next few years will
see even greater emphasis on the
research aspects of the goals for
Hillside Hospital.

I
I

Eight percent of the total Hillside
Hospital budget is currently devoted to research.
National recognition of the research work done at Hillside Hospital. Dr. Donald Klein was appointed as a United States Public
Health Service career investigator.
Dr. Max Fink was appointed to
the committee on Clinical Psychopharmacology of the National Institutes of Mental Health, who
sponsor a national program for the
screening of new drugs in the treatment of mental illness, joining Dr.
Lewis L. Robbins, who has continued as Consultant to the Review
Committee in Mental Health Research; and the sponsorship of the
ﬁrst International Conference on
the EEG and Human Psychopharmocology, at the World Congress
of Psychiatry, Montreal, June
1961 by the Department of Experimental Psychiatry.
Dr. Harry Goldenberg, was hon—
ored by appointment as Chairman
of the Van Slyke Awards Committee, Chairman of the divisional
meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, and panel member of the
Eastern Analytical Symposium.
Dr. Vivian Fishman’s drug research studies were recognized by
the National Institutes of Health

with an invitation to present her
ﬁndings before the Psychopharmacology Round Table in Atlantic
City.
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY
Dr. Fink and his staff completed
their survey of forty psychotropic
compounds and showed the electroencephalogram (EEG) to be
the best available measure of psychotropic drug activity.
Typologies of patient response to

I

I two

major psychotropic

com—

pounds—chlorpromazine and imipramine were deﬁned. This work
enables psychiatrists to determine
the best drug for each patient.

BIOCHEMISTRY
Dr. Goldenberg and his staff investigated the chemical changes
which occur in chlorpromazine
due to glandular activity. Animal
trials led to the discovery that two
products (“metabolites”) derived
from chlorpromazine may be
equivalent or superior to the parent drug.
Other animal studies were carried
out in the laboratory dealing with
the stress phenomenon; these experiments have led to observations
that may be signiﬁcant to the solution of the problems of senile psychosis and atherosclerosis.

I

I

MEDICAL RESEARCH
Dr. Blumberg in his program of
medical research has developed a
ﬁrm basis for the mecholyl test.
He has demonstrated the stability
and the reliability of this test in
chemical use. It is now used as an
effective medical screening device
to determine the patients receptivity to somatic psychiatric treatment.

I

�Publications

A

FINK,

'M_.:

.EEG

Techniques in Study

of Psychotropic Drugs. Discussion.Actaiof Int.'I Meeting‘oh Techniques
for Study of Psychotropic Drugs,
Modena, Soc. Tip'o'grafic‘a Mo'de'nse,
1961.
FINK, M. and KAHN, R. L.: Behavioral

Reproducibility of
the Mecholyi Test, Psychosomatic
Med. 22: 1,1960.

Convulsive Therapy.
A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 5: 30-36,

BLUMBERG A. 'G., LADERMAN- P. and
FINK, M. Efficacy of Divided and

FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. KARP, E..
POLLACK, M., GREEN, M., ALAN, B.
and LEFKOWITS, H. 1.: Inhalant Induced Convulsions: Significance of
the Theory. of theConvulsive Therapy
Precess. A.M.A‘. Arch. Gen. Psychiat.

BLUMB_,ER,G

G.:

'Single Dose Schedules in Insulin'
Coma Therapy, Am. 1. Psychiatry
116: 839-40, March, 1960.;

and KLEIN, D F.:
Severe PapiIIedema Associated With
BLUMBERG, A. G.

Drug Therapy, Am. J. Psychiat. 116::
168- 170, 1961.
BLUMBERG, A, G. and GOLDENBERG.

H. Relation of the Mec‘hoiyl Test
to Catechoiamine Excretion, Proc.
Soc. Exp. Biol. 6: Med 106: 867-869,
1961.

H. Union and Management
Trainees: A Comparative Study of
BOGARD,

Personality and Occupational Choice,
1. of Applied Psychology 44: 56-63,
1-960.

Nursing Staff Functions in a Treatment Setting, 1.
Hillside Hosp. 9: 88-93,1960-.
CLIGGETT, K.:

Occupational Therapy at
the Adolescent PaVIIion, 1. Hillside
Hosp. 9: 80-87, 1960.
ENGEL, R.:

a Case of Depersonalization, 1. Hillside Hosp. 9:
106-127 1960.
FAJRAJZEN, 8.:

_On

Effect of Anticholinergic
Compounds on Post-Convulsive EEG
and Behavior of Psychiatric Patients,
EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 12: 359-369,
FINK, M.:

1960.-

FINK, M.: EEG and BehaviOraI Effects

of Psychopharmacologic Agents. In.
Neuro-PsychopharmacoiQE-Yy ed. P,
Bradley. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp.
441-446, 1960.

FINK, M., 1AFFE, 1. and KAHN, R. |:.:
Drug IndUCed Changes in Interview

Patterns: Linguistic an‘d Neurophysiologic lndices. In Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy. red. G. J. Sarwer-Foner, Springfield, "L, C. C.

Thomas, 1960, pp. 29-44.

FINK, M.: EEG and Behavioral

fects of Tofranii,

Ef-

EEG C-IiII. Neuro-

physiol. 12: 243-44 (abst.) 1960.
FINK, M.:

Differential Treatment and

Prognosis in schizophrenia, by R. D.
Wirt and W. Simon. Book Review,
A..M.A Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 2: 121-

122,1960.

Problems of Antagonists
to Psychotropic Drugs. Discussion.
Neuro—Psychophar‘macology 2: 30-32,
ed. E. Rothlin. Amsterdam, Eisevier,
1961.
FINK, M.:-

Patterns In
11961.

4: 259-266, 1961.

V. and‘GOLDENBERG,

FISHMAN,

H.:

MetaboIi-sm of Chiorpromazine: 0rganIc-Extractable Fraction from Human Urine. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 6:

Med.104: 99,1960.

3.: Helping the Disturbed
Adolescent Acéept Hospitalizatibn.
Social Work 6.69 75.1951
FREEMAN,

M.‘E. and FRIEDMAN, M. R.:
.AfMethod-of Organizing Clinical Data:
A Teaching Aid for Training ResiFRIES."

dents

apy.

Psychoanalytic PsychotherHillside Hosp. ‘9: 25-47, 1960.

in

1.

GALE, M. .and SHATZKY, B.: P.S. 611
y—Queens Annex: ASchool in .a Psychiatric Hospital. 1. Hillside Hosp. 9:

94-99, 1960.

Aftercare Program for
Adolescents. 1. Hillside Hosp. 9,: 61'65, 1960.
GOLDENBER-G, H., FISHMAN, V.,
WH'ITTIER, 1. and BRINITZER, W.:

Urinary Aromatic Excretion Patterns

schizophrenia, A.M.A. Arch. Gen.
Psychiat. 2: 221.1960.
in

GOLDENBERG, H.

and

FISHMA-N, V.:

Species Dependence of Chiorpromazine Metabolism, Proc. Soc. Exp.
Biol. 8: Med. 106. #26884 1961.
GREEN, S. L., KWALWASSER, S., and
STAHL,.A. S.: The Role of the Psychiatrist in a Residential Treatment

Unit. for AdoleSCen'ts. PSychi‘at.
Quart. 34: 662-691, 1960.

Relation Between
Threshold and Duration of Seizures
a'nd Electrbgraphic Change During
Convulsive Therapy. 1. Nerv. Ment.
Dis. 130: 235-239, 1960.
M.

A.:

Approaches to Psychiatric Consultation in a Research
Hospital Setting. A.M.A. Arch. Gen.
Psychiat. 3: 691-697, 1960.
GREENBERG, I.:

I.: Acute lnterc-urrent
Psychosis During the Course -of Familial Periodic Paralysis. Am. 1.
GREENBERG,

Psychiat. 116: 260-263, 1961.

I.: Comparison; of the
Cross-Cultural Adaptive. Process with
Adolescence. compr. Psychiat. 2:

GREENBERG,

44-50, 1961.

1.:

ESECQVER, H., KAHN,
R: L. and FINK, M.: Modification of
1AFFE,

1..

Psychotherapeutic Transactions by
Altered Brain Function. Am. 1. Psychother. 15: 46-55, 1961.
1AFFE,1., FINK, M., and KAHN, R. L:
Changes in Verbal Transactions with
Induced Altered Brain Function. J.
Nerv. Ment. Dis. 130: 235-239, 1960:

Language Patterns as Character Defenses: Implications for Psychoanalytic Technique. Psychological' and, Psychiatric
Aspect of Speech and Hearing, Disorders, ed. D. A. Barbara. Springfield, III., C. C. Thomas, 1960. pp.
138-151.
1AFFE,

Formal

1.:

and FINK, M;: Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria
in Clinical Response to Convulsive
Therapy. J. Neuropsychiat. 1: 242245, 1960.
KAHN,

R.

L.

and FINK,
M.: Figure-Ground Discrimination after Induced Altered Brain Function.
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 2: 547-551,
1960.
KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M.

and FINK,
M.: Social Attitude (California F
Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J.
Nerv. Ment. Dis. 130: 187-192, 1960.
KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M.

LGLYNN, E.: An

GREEN,

Social Factors in the
Doctor-Patient Relationship. In PsyChoanaly'sis and Social Process, ed.
1. Masserman. New York, Grune 8:
Stratton, 1961, pp‘. 81-88.

1AFFE,

and POLLACK, M.: Sociopsychological Factbrs Affecting Therapist-Patient Relationships. Psychoanalysis and Human Va'lues, ed. 1.
Masserman, New York, Grune 8:
Stratton, 1960. pp. 155-168.
KAHN, R. L.

and POLLACK, M.: The
Relationship of Mental and Physical
states in Institutionalized Aged Persons. Am. 1. Psychiat. 117: 120-124,
1960 (with Goldfarb, A. I. and Gerber, l. E.).
KAHN,

R.»

L.

and POLLACK, M.: Brief
Objective Measures for the Determination of Mental Status in the Aged.
Am. 1. Psychiat. 117:, 326-328, 1960
(with Goldfarb, A. I. and Peck, A.).
KAHN, R. L.

Staff Attitudes Toward
Psychiatric Treatment in .a Voluntary
Mental Hospital. 1. Hillside Hosp.
KAHN, R. L.:

10: 97-106, 1961.

KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M. and GOLDFARB, A. I.: Factors Related to In-

dividual Differences in Mental Status
of Institutional Aged. In Psychopathology of Aging, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, 1961, pp. 104-113.

and LEFKOWITS, H. 1.:
Influence of Staff Attitudes and Environmental Factors on Treatment
Selection. 1. Hillside Hosp. 10: 8496, 1961.
KAPLAN, A. I.

�Alterations of Visual Excitability in Patients with Lesions
of the Cerebral Optic Pathways.
KARP, E.:

Trans. A.N.A. 156-159, 1959 (with
Battersby, W. S. and Wagman, I. H.).
Neural Limitations of Visual Excitability: Alterations Produced
by Cerebral Lesions. Arch. Rural. 3:
24-42, 1960 (with Battersby, W. 5.,
Wagman, I. H. and Bender, M. D.).
KARP, E.:

ROSEN, B. H.: Case Report of Auricu-

lar Fibrillation Following the Use
of Imipramine (Tofranil). J. Mount
Sinai Hosp. 27: 6, Nov.-Dec., 1960.
Effect of Interpersonal Relationships Upon Verbal
Conditioning. J. Abnormal I. Social
Psychology 60: 241-6, 1960.
SAPOLSKY, A.:

KAVAZANJIAN, T.: The Role of the
Clinical Psychologist in the Adoles-

and STAHL,
A. 3.: The Treatment Of “Provocative” Behavior in the Disturbed Adolescent. J. Hillside Hosp. 10: 67-81,
1961.

1960.

STAHL, A. 8.: The

cent Pavilion of the Hillside Hospital. J. Hillside Hosp. 9: 65-71,
F.: Mepazine (Pacatal):
Clinical Trial with Placebo Control
KLEIN,

D.

and Psychological Study. Psychopharm. 1: 280-287, 1960 (with J. R.
Whittier, G. Levine and D. Weiss).
and GREEN, 3. L.:
Treatment Program at the Israel
Strauss Pavilion for Adolescent Girls.
J. Hillside Hosp. 9: 14-24, 1960.
KWALWASSER, S.

LEVINE, A.:

Appraising Ego Strength
from the Projective Test Battery. J.
Hillside Hosp. 9: 228-240, 1960.
LINNELL, Z. M.: Authority

as 3 Treatment Modality with Adolescents in
a Psychiatric Hospital. J. Hillside
Hosp. 9: 48-60, 1960.

LURIE, A. and PINSKY, L.: Collabora-

tion between Psychiatric Hospital
and Community Agencies in the
Rehabilitation of Mental Patients.
Mental Patients in Transition, ed.
Milton Greenblatt, Springfield, ”L,
C. C. Thomas, 1951.

Effect of Brain Tumor
on Perception of Hidden Figures
Sorting Behavior and Problem Solving Performance. Dissertation Abstracts. 20: 8, 1960.
POLLACK, M.:

POLLACK, M.:

Comparison of Childhood, Adolescent and Adult Schizophrenias. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 2: 652-660, 1960.
POLLACK, M.: The Face-Hand

Test in
Retarded and Non-retarded Emotionally Disturbed Children. Am. J. Ment.
Def. 64: 758-761, 1960 (with E.

Gordon).

and FINK, M.: Socio~
psychological Characteristics of Patients who Refuse Convulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 132: 153157, 1961.
POLLACK, M.

POLLACK, M., KARP, E., KRAUTHAMER, 6., KLEIN, D. F. and FINK,

M.: Neuropsychologic Response Pat-

terns of Some Psychotropic Drugs.

Neuro-Psychopharmacology 2: 381384, ed. E. Rothlin. Amsterdam,
Elsevier, 1961.
ROBBINS, L. L. and WALLERSTEIN,
R. 8.: Operational Problems of Psychotherapy Research: 1. Initial Stud-

ies. Bull. Menninger Clin. 24: 164189, 19690.

SCHILDKROUT,

M.

S.

First Five Years
of the Israel Straus Adolescent Pavilion Program. J. Hillside Hosp. 9:
5-13, 1960.

WALLACH, S. S., WALLACH, M. B. and

6.: Observation of Involuntary Eye Movements in Certain
Schizophrenics. J. Hillside Hosp. 9:
224-227, 1961.
YESSlN,

ZIE‘RER, E. and ZIERER, E.: The Integration Quotient in Creative Ther—

apy. J. Hillside Hosp. 9: 156-170,
1960.

�Administration
and Finance
5‘

The extent of future development of Hillside Hospital will depend
upon the readiness of the community
to support its program. At this point
it is not possible to project our budget
for five or ten years in the future, but
it is possible to choose a course of
development and to have some general awareness of the fact that expansion of Hillside’s program .
could easily double . . . the current
budget. In addition to the staff augmentation, there will, of course, have
to be a concomitant increase in
housekeeping, administrative personnel and it is evident already that additional facilities, not only for staﬂ
but also for patients, are required.
The current dining facilities are already overtaxed and the areas for
occupational, educational and rec—
reational activities are much too limited and inadequate. Consideration

must be given, therefore, to con—
struction not only of a research building, but also more adequate facilities
for patient activities, staﬁ meeting
rooms, library and dining rooms.”
The charts graphically illustrate
the ﬁnancial operation of our hospital during the ﬁscal year ended June
30, 1961. Sizable deﬁcits were incurred in our in-patient and outpatient services because of the increase in the quality of patient care.
As we continue to make progress and
as we continue to improve wages and
salaries, we believe that these deﬁcits
will increase if we are to continue to
meet our stated objectives. Without
the ﬁnancial assistance of the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies and
our Board of Trustees, the progress
of which this report treats, would
have been impossible.

The professional development

program has required corresponding
expansion and improvement of administrative services. Housekeeping
and Maintenance services have been
enhanced through the application of
industrial management techniques.

HILLSIDE

Hospiut

GLEN OAKS

KIFF. COLEAN, VOSS 3 SOUDER
THE OFFlcE 0F YORK a SAWYER

N, Y.
ARCHITECTS

�Work measurement, preventative
maintenance, a planned painting program and modern equipment have
been emphasized. These programs
have resulted in signiﬁcant improvements in hospital appearance and
services so important to the “therapeutic community.”
To provide the base for effective
organization to achieve stated goals
of our hospital, an intensive personnel management program has been
planned and implemented. Personnel
policies have been developed, consolidated, and published, job analyses have been performed, a job
grading program has been established, a merit evaluation program
has been implemented, and salary
scales were increased for professional and service staff. The results of
these efforts have been an increas—
ingly stable and efﬁcient employee
group of high morale.
Our most immediate need is for
the space which will express the professional development program in
physical terms. Psychiatrists’ oﬂice
space is inadequate, teaching facilities including our Medical Library
are limited, Activities Therapies areas
are widely dispersed and insufﬁcient,
and Research space does not meet
current needs. To meet our space
needs, we have developed a master
plan for future construction. Our
plans provide for construction of an
Activities Therapies building, addi—
tional research facilities, and a staff
housing project. Following construction of these buildings, we will reconstruct presently existing facilities
so that they too, may meet present
and future space needs.

SERVICE COSTS
ln-Patient Service‘
COST

$26.65

L088

$1 .56

INCOME

*Average per patient-day

SERVICE STATISTICS

........................
Number of in-patients treated
...........
Number of out-patients treated
..........
Number of out visits
...................
ln-Patient days

69,941
539

659

14,614

INCREASE IN EXPENDITURES
TREATMENT

and TRAINING

1958-1959

$924,703

1960-1961

UP

42%

$1,310,908
RESEARCH

1956-1959
1960-1961

$ 152,638
$ 198,275 UP 30%

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES‘

1956-1959

$ 729,595

$904,863

1960-1961

UP

24%

MAURICE BACHRACH

Administrator

TOTALS

1958-1959

$1,806,936

1960-1961

$2,414,046

*lncludes Administration. Accounting, Food Service, Housekeeping,
Maintenance, Office Services and Medical Records.

�JANUARY 1,

1960—JUNE,30,

Jeena'

Attending Psychiatric Staff
ATTENDING PSYCHIATRISTS

Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.‘
Lawrence J. Roose, M.D.*

Samuel Atkin, M.D.*
Frank Berchenko, M.D.

Robert Savitt, M.D.'
Martin Schreiber, M.D.*
Isid'or Silbermann, M.D."
Otto Sperling, M.D.t
Aaron Stein, M.D.*
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.*
A.

lsidor Bernstein, M.D.
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.'
M. David Epstein, M.D.I'
Margaret E. Fries, M.D.‘t
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.t
George S. Goldman, M.D.‘T
Paul Goolker, M.D.*
Sidney L. Green, M.D.*
William Karliner, M.D.‘
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.‘
Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Simon Kwalwasser, M.D.
Samuel R. Lehrman, M.D.‘
Abraham S. Lenzner, M.D.
Joseph s. A. Miller, MD!
Martin H. Orens, M.D.:
Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.*

ASSOCIATE ATTENDING
PSYCHIATRISTS

Renato J. Almansi, M.D.
Alexander J. Friedman, M.D.
SoIl Goodman, M.D.
Abraham I. Kaplan, M.D.
Louis Kaywin, M.D.
Bruce Kendall, M.D.
Geraldine Pederson-Krag, M.D.
William W. Pike, M.D.
Jay Stanton, M.D.

ADJUNCT ATTENDING
PNYCNIATRISTS

’lebur Jarvis; M D_.

‘

Edward R. Adelson, M.D.
Herman S. Alpert, M.D.
Alvin B. Balaban, M.D.
Irving L. Bauer, M.D.
Benjamin J. Becker, M.D.
Julius Beli’nkoff, M.D..
Milton M. Berger, M.D.
Lionel H. Blackman, M.D.
Rita M. Chalef, M.D.
Isadore H. Cohn, M.D.
Irving J. Crain, M.D.
Joseph H. Feldman, M.D.
Jules Glenn, M.D.
Albert E. Goldberg, M.D.
Michael Gould, M.D.
Lebert Harris, M.D.
AIbErt Harrison, M.D.
Thomas Hora, M.D.
Martin Hurvitz, M.D.

Eugene H.Kaplan,.M.D.

.Paul Kay, M.D.
George R. Krupp, M. D.
Peter Laderma'n, M. D..
Myer D. Mendelson, M.Dd"
David Milrod, M. D.
Helene Pap‘anek, M.D
Henry Rasner, M.
Irving Salan, M. D.
Frjéd' U. Tate; M. D.
B. Frank Vogel, MDi.
Leonard Weinroth, M D
‘

.

D

Herbert Wie’de'r, M.D.

Consulting Physicians and Surgeons
MEDICINE

Lester Cohen, M.D.*
George Sabrin, M.D.
Louis Rosenblum, M.D.
Jerome Weinstein, M.D.
Wilbur 8. Brett, M.D.
Arnold L. Berger, M.D.
DERMATOLOGY

Joel Schweig, M.D.
Norman Goldfa’rb, M.D.
Eugene L. Bodian, M.D.

GENERAL SURGERY

Sidney Hirsch, M.D.*
Stephen Deckoff, M.D.
UROLOGY

Daniel Kaufman, M.D.

Albert Sutton, M.D.
ORTHOPEDICS
A. H. Lewert, M.D.

Julius Schneiderr‘n‘an, M.D.
PROCTOLOGY

Benjamin Warner, M.D.

NEUROLOGY

Kurt Adler, M.D.

Joseph Siris, M.D.
Martin Green, M.D.

OPHTHALMOLOGY

Edward Seretan, M.D.
Robert Jampel, M.D.

OTOLARYNOLOGY

DENTAL sen VICLE
Director
Palil Schemari, .:D D. S.- ‘
Associate Director
J. GordonRuDin, D'.‘D._S..
Associate Dentists
Benjamin S'c'hwai‘d} '73-'Bernard: Lebow, D. D.S.
Adjunct Dentists
Lepn Bas'son, D. D. S‘Carl Blacharsh D
Herbert Eormani‘
EISa Friedman,
Henry Lewis, D.
Martin Protéll, D S;
'

Sam Clayton, M.D.
Samuel Henken, M.D.
ANESTHESIOLOGY

Georges Bean, M.D.
GYNECOLOGY

Marie P. Warner, M.D.

Bernard Greenblat, M.D.
Jack Cohen, M.D.
RADIOLOGY

Bernard Epstein, M.D.

Paul S’teinhorn, M.D.
PODIATRY

William Rieder, Pod.0.

OPTOMETRYSERVICE
Edward Steinherg,

OJDf.

Professional and Non-Professional Employees
We wish to express our appreciation to the following professional

employees, who helped make our progress possible.

and non- professronal

PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES
ACTIVITIES THERAPY

Judith Conrad
Karen Diaslo
Laura Dunlap
Ann Elliott
Miriam Gozali
Phyllis Holland
Mona Jones
Mary Marrone
Lila Martin
Marion Sheffer
_

Richard Thaler
Joan Tucker
Yaeka Umemura
Alida Vasquez
CLINICAL LABORATORY

and

x41"

Kathryn Boone
carolyn siegel
DENTAL

Bertha Sckipp

MEDICAL RESEARCH

Stephen Deckoff, M.D.
Laura Zaves, R.N.
PHARMACY

Eleanor Palais

RESEARCH IN BIOCHEMISTRY

PSYCHOLOGISTS

Howard Bogar'd, Ph.D.
Eugene Friedman, Ph.D..
Benjamin Lapkin, Ph.D.
Ira Rosenblatt, Ph.D.

‘Formerly Member of the Medical Board

Allen Sapolsky, .Ph D‘.
Stanley Schlff, P D.'-.
Eelix Steiner, P
Leonette V‘anderhost”.
Florence Volkman‘

TR'es‘igneJ

Robert Burnett

.

Vivian Fishman Ph. D.
'
Audre Heater)
Michael Rabinowitz;
Daniel [White-

wgeeasea‘?

.

�RESEARCH IN
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY

Ira Belmont, Ph.D.
Romeo .Cartolano
llana Goldschmidt
Abraham Kaplan, M.D.
Eric Karp, M.A.
Donald Klein, M.D.
Jean Kolodny
John C. Kramer, M.D.
Hanna Mosquera
Max Pollack, Ph.D.
Arthur Willner, Ph.D.
REGISTERED NURSES

Marie Cafiero
Isabelle Copeland
Ann Dispensa
Carol Enggasser

Maureen Rolston
Rose Schulbaum
Helen Stein

Zelda Feigenbaum
Evelyn Feminella
Marion Fitzgerald
Millicent Goldberg'
‘Ilse Hurst
Ann Kelley
Joseph Kelly
Patricia Kenney
Elaine Kirs’chenbaum
Ann Klemballa
Mar'y' ‘Kohnke

Kathleen Le'eFlora McCartney
Joann Mastrole
Martha Morey
Janet Moses

_

NanCy Steinhardt
Gladys :Stokes‘
.Cfa‘therine' Szakmary
Hele‘n Thrasher

EditthitoIo

Dorothy Urban
Helen Zeigler
LICENSED PRACTICAL
NURSES
Mar-y Corrigan
Maud Drun'canson

Heathlean English
Theresa Homrd
Betty Ann Kelly
Luverne Reeves

Mary Nigro
Myra Pesk0witz

MYrtle‘Re‘mbe‘rt

Shirl‘eyi Piot’nic‘k

Gloria Swan
Ruth Thiele‘
Catherine Wall

Sylvia :Riback
Nancy Rosenbaum
Lita Schmidt
S'eymotir Silverberg
Gisela Tauber
Alice Thompson
Ellen weinstein

Isabelle Young;
SOCIAL SERVICES

Casework Division
"Robert F ishman
BeatriCIe Freeman
“Sally Gold
Regina G‘oldstein
Beatrice 'Hartley
Grace HaWKi‘ns
Mildred Heller
Connie Israel

SarahKlionsky
Sondra Match
Anita Mehr

:SOCIAL

se‘nwces

Group Work DiVision
Ellen Brathwaite

Deugla‘s‘Glangw
Barbara ‘Goldstein
Robert'Handman
Elaine Heyman
Geraldine’Lauter
Beverly Luther
Adele Orlinsky

SERVICE AND NON-PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES
BUILDINGS and GROUNDS
Adam Biali'k

Edward Brady
John R. CivinSkas
Edward Fitzgerald
Gustavo Greco
Frank Greene
George Jungk
Bernard Keena
Salvatore Lav Manna
George Loblein
Nero Moyd
Stanley Novak
Walter Roland Jr.
Albert Schmid
Joseph Seagren’

Albert Senese
John-Skinder
Thomas- Slaton
Ignazio Taormina
Leroy Watkins
CLERICAL and BDOKKEEPING
Accounting Department
Arline Fle’ischmann
Lillian Ingbe‘r
Lillian Schaeffer
Ethel Siegelman
Jeannette Silver

Dorothy Streir
Office Services
Irene Attinson
Mary Benesta’d
John Borgner
Diane Brafm'an
Jane Buckley

Elizabeth cox
Irene Djinkin

Claire Dubin
Leonora Edelstein
Eugenia Fievss
Marlene Forman
,Norma’Friedman.
Shirlee G'alanty
Sara Gingold
EdWard Golove
Frances Gullo
James Hand

Norberto Medina

Adele Harris
Grace Hyams

Ida NoVick
Martin Novick
Gaspari Orlando

SyIVI'a Hymo‘witz

Belle Kapner
Edna Kappes.
Rose Landgarten
Esta Levy
Dorothy McClary
Inge Mai
Yetta Mintz
Catherine Muff
Florence Offsie
Aileen Olton
Elinor Paur
Mary Pignoni
Regina Pi'lchick
Gloria Podrid
Rita Rodon
Joseph Ryan
Dorothy Saults,
Rose Sa‘vader
Dorothy ‘Schnirman
Belle Schultz
Charlotte Sinovoi

B'ettyStarr
Edna Telesca
Walter Theisen
Crannie Weinstein
Edna Weis'sman
Lott‘e Wollman
BIanche-Zaitz

rooo seninces

Francesco Ca‘nnetto
Emma Casamassima
Walter Davis, Jr.
Arthur DWyer
Pardo Faro
Alphonse’Gross
Ella Jacobs
Jimmy Knight-

Barbera
Alfred Lemaire
Gustavo Lescouflair
Sarah Littles
Anna Lueatorto
Michael McDonough
Arthu’r Martin

Fortunate

La

Arthur Pitts

Irwin Powell
B'azil Allen Rivers
Walter Rodney
Eva Schwartz

Helen Thompson
Tindel Thompson
HDUSEKEEPINC
Low‘ell Booker

Louis Burgie
George Cables
Jesus Cora
James Cuozzo
Jimmy Lee Dasher
Nathaniel Glover

Charles T. Hill
Gerard Honore
Joseph Hope

‘

William Hyman
Heie'n Jackson,
Ruby Jackson
Marion Johnson
Ernest King
Harry‘Lewis
August Lo Piccolo
Annie Miller
Roosévelt Mitchell
Robert Reddick
Agnes Schuster
Willie Lee Skinner
Ray Warren
Blanche White
William Wood

PSYCHIATRIC AIDES
Olga Allen

Marion Bell
Althea Bing;
George"

‘Bi n‘gha‘m

William Black, Jr.
Beatrice Blake
Annie Bo‘n'd

Joseph Britt

Joan Brown
Lawrence Burger
Raymond Burger
Frances Butler
Sylvester campbell
Malcolm carter
Annie Clements
Alma Clinton
Frederick Coley
May Conrad
Teresa Cooney
Hatti'e'Cummings
Catherine Eames
Annie M. ‘Ervin
Ellen Es‘aw'
Guillaume Esse‘rs
Irish Ford
Herbert Franklin
Idella Gaston
Nettie Gordon
Dolores Griffin
Juliet Haipern
Mabel Harper

Essie Harris
Linda Hart
George Heller
Alberta Hopkins
Ethel HopWood
June Johnson
Anna Mae JonesThomas Kelson, Jr.
A‘s‘a’lee‘Kirby

Helen Olsen
Clemmie Palmer
Joseph Petty
Ida Pulliam
Elizabeth Rodriquez
Dorothy Schrantz
Carltdn Scott
Lessie Mae Scott

MildredShaw
Grace Shieh
Virginia'Smith
Chauncey smokton
Henrietta Strachan
Bessie Sumner

Louise Thiell
Marion Thomas
Walter T. Thomas
Clyde Trotman
Jean Trotman
Clarence Tully
Thomas Valentine, Jr.
Martha Visalli
Martha Welch
Hazel White
Leona Willett
LaWrence Williams
Anna Wolfberg
Leon Wolfberg
Clarence Young
Edgar Zephyrine

.

Barbara Knight
Doris Kraemer
Josephine Lafayette
Arthur Lanier

Leslie. Lee
Miriam Lee
.Alic‘e'Leliukevicz
Georgina Lohman
Grace Lozano
Thel‘matMac‘k

Mildred March
Laura Matthews
Dolores Mitchell
waiter Moore
Ronald Myles

designed and IIIUstrated by VISUAL SERVICES Inc.

�HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
..

is licensed by
the New York State Department of Mental Hygiene.
g

..

is approved for resident training by
Council on Medical Education, American Medical Assmiation.
American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology.

. . is

..

..

accredited by

American Psychiatric Association.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals.

is a member of
American Hospital Association.
Hospital Association of New York State.
Greater New York Hospital Association.
Greater New York Fund.
Unite'd'Hospital Fund.
Welfare and Health Council of New York City.
National Conference of Jewish Communal ServiCes.

cooperates with

Adelphi College.
Altro Workshops.
Federation Employment and Guidance Service.Jewish Community Service of Long Island.
Jewish Family Service of New York.
Long Island Jewish Hospital.
New York City Board of Education.
New York State Employment Service.
New York State Department of VacatiOnal Rehabilitation.
Queens College of the City of New Yerk.
The Educational Alliance
.

-

_

is
.. a partieipating hospital
in Master Plan for Hospitals and Related Facilities:
for The Hospital Council of Greater New York.

A
‘

~

‘
A

‘

»

Hillside Hospital is a constituent agency of the Federation :of Jewish: Hiii'li'aothirepies

.of‘Neinork

�for
psychkunk:ﬂeaﬂnent
haﬂﬁhg
and
research

January 19, 1962

Dear Fellow Employee:

of the Hillside Hospital's Progress
Attached to this letter is a c
read
this
As
and
61.
1960
family
your
you
the
fiscal
for
Report
year
made
toward
have
we
that
reminded
of
the
be
progress
Report, you will
the establishment of Hillside as a leading hospital for psychiatric

treatment, training and research.

been
have
would
possible
not
which
Speaks,
Report
of
this
progress,
without the dedication, loyalty and effort which you and your fellow
would
we
For
few
shown
the
have
this,
last
during
years.
employees
like to extend our thanks.
The

Cordially,

W

X.

”m4/69/

Lewis L. Robbins, M. D.

Medica1.Director

',

Maurice Bachrach

Administrator

LLRﬁMB/SD/mb

�32nd Annual Report
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
Glen Oaks,Queens,N.Y.

�Hillside Hospital is
a nonprofit,

nonsectarian
mental hospital
for the treatment
of voluntary patients,

suffering from early
and curable
mental symptoms and

admitted regardless
of ability to pay.

The Hospital is a
pilot institution,

pioneering in and
advancing the
scientific frontiers
of the human and

efficacious application
of psychiatry to the

mentally ill. Hillside
provides organized

training for physicians
in

postgraduate

psychiatry and

psychotherapy. Major

emphasis is placed on
advanced research in
all phases of treatment.

��...........
REPORT OF THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR
...................
PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF MEMBERS.

5
6

TREATMENT

8

REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE HOSPITAL
3
SOCIETY OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES. 4

.

.

.

......................................
11
TRAINING
........................................
RESEARCH
14
.......................................
STAFF PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
16
.............
REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE
18
......
MEMBERS OF THE
19
....................
REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
20
.....................
PROFESSIONAL
NONPROFESSIONAL
AND

MEDICAL BOARD

MEDICAL BOARD

AND

EMPLOYEES

......

1959
32nd Annual Report
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
Glen Oaks, Queens, N.Y.

�______WHM._.._»

This is my ﬁfth and last annual report
as President of the Board of Trustees of
Hillside Hospital, and I am happy indeed
to be able to state that during this last
L.
Robbins
Lewis
Dr.
of
service,
my
year
has become Medical Director of the Hospital. His broad gauged plans have been
submitted to our Board, and accepted for
the future development and general planning of the treatment, teaching and research programs of the Hospital.
There have been many changes here at
Hillside since the death of our founder,
Dr. Israel Strauss in 1955, and my election as the second president. I am confident that the original ambitions of our
founder to improve treatment, to instruct
as many as we can, and above all to attempt to really learn the “why” and
“what” of mental illness have been
furthered. I believe that my able successor, D. Herbert Beskind, will follow these
same general pathways.
During this past year, among other interesting incidents, may be mentioned the
adoption by Hillside of the personnel
policy of the Greater New York Hospital
Association, the conversion of our insulin
recovery dormitory into offices and conference rooms for research, and the raising of the basic rate of compensation by
New York City from $16.00 to $20.00 per
day. Costs continue their unbroken upward course, and the day of the “lowcost” hospital seems doomed. Adequate
service combined with low cost appears
to be a paradox.
The need for additional buildings is,
of course, generally present with most
progressive hospitals, and we are no exception. During this year it has become
apparent that we simply must have an
Activities Therapy Building, since we just

do not have enough room for our patients
in the present quarters; and a specialized
research building is really necessary since
research is so obviously demanded to improve treatment results. Both of these
buildings will, hopefully, begin construction in 1960. We have been granted
$125,000 from the estate of our former

Trustee, Edwin Elson, for the Activities
Therapy Building; and we have been able
to match this amount with a grant of
$150,000 from the United States Public
Health Service, for a research building.
An incidental, but most important effect
of the construction of these buildings will
be to create space which may be used for
critically needed living-in quarters for
our personnel. Such quarters will improve
the well-being of our staff, something
which has always been of great importance to us.
Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller, our former
Medical Director, resigned during 1959
with plans to enter private practice; he
continues, fortunately, to serve the hospital as a consultant and teacher. We all
wish him every success in the years to
come.

In closing this, my last report, I wish
to refer to two principles affecting com—
munity activities which to me seem important. One that has guided me in my
own decisions, is that it is important to
rotate top board ofﬁcers. Such action not

REPORT OF THE
PRESIDENT
OF THE HOSPITAL

Alvin E. Coleman

only affords opportunity to more individuals 'to serve, more variety in ideas, but
probably, more efﬁciency, on the basis of
the old adage that “a new broom sweeps

clean”!

The second principle is possibly more
important since it refers to the motivation
of why “we seek to serve.” Laymen who
donate their time and thought to community affairs do so, of course, to be of
service to those less fortunate than themselves. However, an important additional
motive is the gain of ego gratiﬁcation from
having a controlling part in decisions vital
to their institution. Such emotions bring
satisfaction to us, and are no doubt an
important part of the broader life. It is
this drive which makes the boards of or—
ganizations so effective, and I believe that
the autonomy of each board of each organization is absolutely essential to maintain
this effectiveness. It seems to me that any
serious interference with this autonomy
would greatly weaken organizational actions, would make board memberships a
mere fiction, and would soon cause board
members to lose interest and drop active
participation in institutional activities.
This would be calamitous.
It is with mixed emotions that I pass
along the gavel of leadership. Mine is not
only a sense of great satisfaction and
pride in having been able to serve such an
outstanding institution, but also is a feeling of humility at the vastness of the
horizon and the smallness of the job accomplished thus far. May I express my
deep appreciation and friendship to the
professionals of the hopsital, and to the
members of the Board of Trustees who
have worked with me and so greatly
helped me, and with whom it has been a
privilege and a pleasure to serve.

�OFFICERS‘

President

Alvin E. Coleman
Chairman of the Board
Roy Foster
Honorary Chairman of the

Board
Leon Lowenstein
Vice Presidents

Dudley Shoenfeld, M.D.
D. Herbert Beskind
George W. Galinger

Secretary

Manuel Lee Robbins

Assistant Secretaries
A. Jacob Abrams
M. Victor Leventritt
Treasurer

David Finn
Roy Foster
George W. Galinger

Assistant Treasurer
Arthur Garson
Members:
A. Jacob Abrams
Jonas Adler
Alfred Appel

Meyer Goldstein

Arnold S. Askin

Arnold S. Askin
John M. Bendheim
D. Herbert Beskind
David Bunim
Alvin E. Coleman
Martin Coleman
Morris David
Thomas Epstein

Arthur

C.

Fatt

David Finkle

Arthur Gar-son
Maurice Glinert

Jacob Epstein Katz
Carl L. Kempner
Harold P. Kurzman
M. Victor Leventritt

Budd Levinson
Morris L. Levinson
Milton B. Loeb
Sandor Lorand, M.D.
Leon Lowenstein
Charles H. Meyer

Arthur Murray

Charles Revson
Manuel Lee Robbins
Irving Rosenbaum
S. H. Scheuer
Walter Scheuer
Dudley D. Shoenfeld, M.D.
Harry Silverson
John W. Straus
Irving Weisglass
Nathan Wigod
Morton S. Wolf
Walter D. Yankauer

Morton S. Wolf
Walter D. Yankauer
CHAIRMEN OF STANDING
COMMITTEES

Executive Committee
Roy Foster
Medical Affairs Committee
D. Herbert Beskind
Finance Committee
Arnold S. Askin
House &amp; Grounds Committee
George W. Galinger
Nathan Wigod

Legal Committee
Charles H. Meyer
Social Service Committee
Hilda N. Strauss,
Honorary Chairman
M. Victor Leventritt,
Chairman
Personnel Committee
Meyer Goldstein
Nominating Committee
Walter Yankauer
Gifts Jr Legacies Committee
Walter Yankauer
Committee On Administrative
Savings
Arnold S. Askin
Building Committee
D. Herbert Beskind,
George W. Galinger,
‘As a/ Novenlber 15, 1959

Honorary Trustees:
Saul Blickman
Hilda N. Strauss
Executive Committee

Members
Arnold S. Askin
D. Herbert Beskind
Alvin E. Coleman

Arthur C. Fatt
Roy Foster

George W. Galinger

M. Victor Leventritt

Leon Lowenstein
Charles H. Meyer
Manuel Lee Robbins
S. H. Scheuer
Dudley D. Shoenfeld M.D.

SOCIETY
OF THE
HILLSIDE
HOSPITAL
BOARD OF

TRUSTEES

A4.

‘,..

A

�The function of an annual report is to
look backward brieﬂy in order to assess
how well one is looking ahead. Much that
took place during this past year indicates
that Hillside Hospital has been making
steady progress toward achieving the best
clinical program that current knowledge
permits in order to provide a base for
achieving its research and training goals.
During the year, the staff was reorgan—
ized into sections consisting of members
of each of the professional disciplines:

phychiatry, psychology, social work,

activities therapies, and psychiatric nursing—and each section was given responsibility for all the patients living in a
particular ward and/or cottage. The patients are no longer being transferred
from one living area to another; they now
remain in contact with the same personnel
throughout the length of their hospital
stay. This plan permits the members of
the staff assigned to each section to integrate and co-ordinate their efforts much
more effectively, thus further facilitating
our goal of individualizing treatment.
Through administrative changes in our
intake procedures, we have eliminated our
long waiting list, making it possible for
many patients to enter the hospital within
twenty-four to forty-eight hours. All patients who are approved are admitted
within two weeks.
At the end of the year, Hillside Hospital
was ofﬁcially approved by the Central
Inspection Board of the American Psychiatric Association and by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals.
These organizations regularly inspect
psychiatric hospitals to insure the maintenance of high levels of patient care. The
detailed report of their inspection indicated that, on all counts, our treatment
program, staff and physical plant met
their higher standards.
In April of this year the Children’s
Out-Patient Clinic was opened and is now
in full operation. In addition to providing

treatment for disturbed children and

their parents, this clinic offers supervised
experience in child psychiatry for psychiatrists practicing in the community, as
well as for physicians in our residency
training program. This additional clinical
activity will also serve as an important
part of future research.
Hillside Hospital has long accepted its
responsibilities for training psychiatric
personnel. In July, we increased the number of psychiatric residents in training
from eighteen to twenty-ﬁve and have
developed an educational program to
teach residents in each of the three years
of residency. In addition, training beyond
the residency level is being added for psychiatrists in the hospital as well as in our
out-patient clinics. During 1959, the Nursing Department instructed students from
several hospitals and nursing schools.
The Psychology Department provided
instruction in Vocational Counseling;
Occupational Therapy had students from
Columbia University; the Department of
Social Services maintained its training
programs with the New York School of
Social Work and with Adelphi College.
The Department of Experimental Psychiatry has been providing research training in connection with the psychiatric
residency. All these and other departments have been most active in many
aspects of training, further details of
which follow.
Above all, the staff of Hillside Hospital
has continued its interest in advancing
our knowledge through research. A list
of numerous presentations and publications indicating research being done at

REPORT OF
THE MEDICAL
DIRECTOR
Lewis

L.

Robbins, M.D.

Hillside is included in this report. It
should be noted that it is our determined
philosophy to carry out investigations in
all these three areas; psychology, biology
and sociology and to share our ﬁndings
with others in the hope that much-needed
advances in our ﬁeld can be achieved. It
is also gratifying to ﬁnd our judgments
about the value of our research activities
and the competence of our research staff
conﬁrmed by several foundations and
other agencies. Among those which have
generously supported our research programs are the Nassau County Commu-

nity Mental Health Board and the

National Institutes of Mental Health.
Numerous other developments have
taken place during the past year. We have
altered our former insulin unit to provide
class rooms, conference rooms, a one-way
viewing room, and ofﬁces. We have inaugurated a careful study of all of our
physical facilities in order to meet our
developing needs. Our volunteer program
has been considerably augmented and
staff has been added in several departments to further beneﬁt our patients.
Co-operative programs with Long Island
Jewish Hospital have added to both our
treatment and training programs and
give promise of valuable further collaborative activity.
All that has been accomplished during
the past year has been based on the ﬁne
work of many people over many years.
Outstanding have been the contributions
of Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller, who after
many years of distinguished service,
retired in August from the position of
Medical Director. To him, and to all the
staff, past and present, the writer is
indebted for providing such a solid base
on which to build our future. Also, to the
Medical Board and to the leadership of
its President, Dr. Robert A. Savitt; and
to the Board of Trustees which, under the
leadership of its President, Alvin E. Coleman, has given advice and support—~the
writer is gratefully indebted.

�ADMINISTRATION

Medical Director
Joseph S. A. Miller, M.D.*
Lewis L. Robbins, M.D.
Associate Medical Director
Simon Kwalwasser, M.D.

Administrator
Maurice Bachrach, B.S.
Assistant Administrator

Samuel Davis, B.A., M.S.

STAFF PSYCHIATRISTS

William Benjamin, M.D.
Muriel Benton, M.D.

Calvin Cheek, M.D.
David Graubert, M.D.
Henry Lefkowits, M.D.
Zenos M. Linnell, M.D.
Gerhard Schauer, M.D.
Barbara Ure, M.D.
Morton Wachspress, M.D.
George Yessin, M.D.

PROFESSIONAL DEPARTMENT
HEADS

Creative Therapy
Ernest Zierer, Ph.D., Director
Edith Zierer, Ass ’t Director
Experimental Psychiatry
Maximillian Fink, M.D.,
Director

Internal Medicine

Arnold Blumberg, M.D.,
Director
Israel Strauss Pavilion for
Adolescent Girls
Alice Slater Stahl, M.D.,
Director

Laboratories
Harry Goldenberg, Ph.D.,
Director
John Croghan, R.T., M.T.,
Supervisor
Nursing
Goldie Krupa, R.N., Director
Nancy J eﬁries, R.N.,
Assistant Director
Occupational Therapy
Eileen Fisher, B.S., Director
Out-Patient Services
Robert R. Luttrell, M.D.,
Director
Harvey Goldey, M.D.,
Assistant Director
Robert Navarre, M.D.,
Assistant Director
Aaron D. Weiner, M.D.,
Director
Child Therapy Unit

Psychology
Abraham Levine, Ph.D.,
Director
Social Services
Abraham Lurie, M.S.S.W.,
Director
Louise Pinsky, M.S.S.W.,
Assistant Director,
Case Work Division
Arnold Eisen, M.S.S.W.,
Assistant Director,
Group Work Division
CLINICAL ASSISTANTS

Lester I. Abend, M.D.
Edward R. Adelson, M.D.
Romano Antonelli, M.D.
Marion Axel, M.D.
Howard Boskey, M.D.
Stanley Brodsky, M.D.
Daniel Chansky, M.D.
Fred B. Charatan, M.D.
Lionel Chertoﬂ’, M.D.
Ralph W. Clemments, M.D.
Frances Colonna, M.D.
Stefano Fajrajzen, M.D.
Irving J. Farber, M.D.
Philip Friedland, M.D.
Ruth Fuchs, M.D.
Harold Galef, M.D.
Harvey Goldey, M.D.
Sumner I. Goldstein, M.D.
Clara Gonda, M.D.
Eugene Glynn, MD: Director
Adolescent After-Care Unit

Lebert Harris, M.D.
Martin Hurvitz, M.D.
Gunthar Jacob, M.D.
Norman Levy, M.D.
Zenos Linnell, M.D.
Buck Luria, M.D.
Howard Mele, M.D.
Daniel Miller, M.D.

Meyer Monchek, M.D.
Beatric Nachtigal, M.D.
Maurice Nadelman, M.D.
Iris Orens, M.D.
Joseph D. Rosen, M.D.
J ehuda Rozanski, M.D.
Leon Tec, M.D.
David M. Tillim, M.D.
Clara Torda, M.D.

PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENTS

Bruno Bellinfante, M.D.
Reva Berstock, M.D.
Richard Brown, M.D.
Sevin Eker, M.D.
Richard Frenkel, M.D.
Robert Glauboch, M.D.
Feridun Gunduy, M.D.
Halldor Hansen, M.D.

Harry Gonda, M.D.
Paul Hansch, M.D.

PROFESSIONAL
AND
ADMINISTRATIVE

STAFF
MEMBERS

Sherwin Harris, M.D.
Raymond Hollander, M.D.

John Kramer, M.D.
Leslie Langlois, M.D.
Jay Lefer, M.D.
Genesia Liu, M.D.
Dorothy Lieberman, M.D.
Harvey Mandel, M.D.
Mark N essel, M.D.
Richard Resnick, M.D.
Alvaro Rozo, M.D.
Mollie Schildkrout, M.D.
Jack Schnee, M.D.
David Steinman, M.D.
Michael Trupp, M.D.
Shirley Wallach, M.D.
Daniel Weitzner, M.D.
ADMINISTRATIVE
DEPARTMENT HEADS

Accounting Services
Dorothy Croghan
Buildings cf Grounds
Thomas R. Lumley
Dietary Services
Angelina Canavan, B.A.
Housekeeping
Sarah Travers
Oﬁ‘ice Services
Lillian Dailey
’Resigned I959

��The function of the Hillside Hospital InPatient Service is to provide treatment to
patients suffering from the early and
curable symptoms of mental illness. It is
not the intention of Hillside Hospital to
meet the overwhelming need of the com—
munity for psychiatric treatment facilities. Limitations of funds and the inability
to provide an expansive treatment pro—
gram compatible with the Hospital’s
training and research goals make limitation of the number of in-patients necestherathe
if
be
the
This
case
must
sary.
peutic community is to be a real treatment modality. It is therefore our purpose to provide a treatment program
which is consistent with Hillside Hospital’s image of itself as a pilot institution
in the field of mental health.
Basic to the treatment of patients at
Hillside Hospital is a concept of the
therapeutic community. The effective relationships between patients and staff,
as well as those between patients themselves is a basic element of the treatment
program. Moving psychiatric patients
from nursing unit to nursing unit, as
their conditions improved, meant changed
relationships as each move was made. This
structure did not provide the best therapeutic situation for our patients. Therefore, in 1959, it was decided to reorganize
the treatment service on the premise that
patients remain in the units to which they
are admitted throughout their entire hospital stay. This arrangement provides
further advantages to the treatment program. Not only are staff psychiatrists,
psychiatric residents and nursing person-

nel able to develop sustained relationships
as a therapeutic team, but the patients
are also able to develop such relationships
with each other, without having to face
the problems associated with a constantly
’s
patient
environment.
Further,
changing
self—government is stabilized by this arrangement. Finally, the entire administrative organization of the hospital has
been facilitated by this organizational
change in that sustained accountability
for the total treatment program is now
possible.
In connection with this reorganization,
several signiﬁcant changes took place
within the Nursing Service during 1959.
Provision of adequate nursing care within the revised organization required the
restructuring of staffing patterns. A major segment of the nursing service was
reassigned to provide the equal distribution of technical, semi-professional and
professional nursing skills to all patient
units. In the effort to improve staffing
patterns, two new personnel categories
were created in 1959—Counselor and
Senior Psychiatric Aide.
As a result of changes in the hospital
treatment program, there have been corresponding changes in the assignment of
the case work staff of the Social Services

TREATMENT
TRAl N l N

RES EA

Department. Two psychiatric social workers are now assigned to each administrative unit. It is now possible to co-ordinate
work—
social
the
of
work
the
closely
more
ers with the work of other members of
the team. The casework division has been
making increasing use of group counselling. The group approach is now used
by the case work in the Hillside Hospital After-Care Clinic. Social workers who
function in connection with the InoPatient
Service are supplementing individual
contacts with visits with patient ’s relatives with group counselling.
The admissions policy of the hospital
in
radically
and
reviewed
changed
was
1959. By making it possible to accept
appointments for patients applying for
admission during any week day, the delay in accepting patients has been drastically reduced. In addition, excessive
waiting lists for in-patient admission have
been virtually eliminated through the
efforts of the Social Work Division, and
the staff psychiatrists. Assessment of patient suitability for admission and rapid
processing of patients who are accepted
for admission is now possible.
1959 saw further expansion of the
services of the Group Work Division of
the Social Services Department in the
provision of additional social and recreational facilities to the in-patient group.
Patient government, social clubs, service
groups, special interest groups and the
the
from
comvolunteers
for
program
munity were considerably expanded.

�The Psychology Department in 1959
continued its program of diagnostic evaluation of the patient, in keeping with its
function within the treatment team. The
Vocational Counselling Unit of the Psychology Department continued to provide

vocational counselling, training and
placement services to our patients. The
Vocational Counselling Unit joined with
the Group Work Division in 1959, in the
establishment of a secretarial skills program which was taught to patients by
volunteers.
The Occupational Therapy Department
saw marked growth in 1959. To enable
this department to treat the entire patient population and to eliminate waiting
lists for this service, the staff was increased from ﬁve to twelve therapists.
This permitted more intensive function
by occupational therapists in the therapeutic team. Further, a high level of
individualized occupational therapy is
now possible. An Art Therapy program
was also inaugurated in 1959. The Creative Therapy Department continues to
perform its dual function as a diagnostic
and therapeutic unit.

_

Nonpsychiatric medical needs of Hillside Hospital patients are met through
the Intramural Clinic. The Hospital Internist participates in initial and dis—
charge conferences concerning patients
whose physical problems are signiﬁcant
in the planning of the total therapeutic
program. Consultants in every branch of
medicine give freely of their time to the
support of patient care. Further, the
services and facilities of the Long Island
Jewish Hospital are utilized wherever
indicated. An excellent Dental Unit is
also provided to meet the particular dental needs of the mentally ill patients. This
latter clinic is also fully staffed by dentists who serve voluntarily.
The Hillside Hospital Out-Patient Department provides psychiatric care to
residents of Queens, Nassau and Suffolk
Counties who cannot pay for private
psychiatric care. In 1959 an average of
over one hundred persons were treated
each week. In addition to individual
psychotherapy, three group psychotherapy programs were established. 1959 also
saw the staffing pattern of this clinic improved by the addition of more highly
qualiﬁed doctors to insure the provision
of a treatment program consonant with
the goals of the Hospital. The out-patient
selection process, too, was revised to
afford immediate consultation Within
twenty-four to forty-eight hours for all
applicants.
On April 1, 1959, the Child Therapy
Unit of Hillside Hospital Out-Patient
Department was opened with the help of
a grant from the Nassau County Mental

Health Board. A pilot project in the provision of psychotherapy for children, this
clinic is further intended to provide the
base for the expansion of future child
care services at Hillside Hospital. The
staff of the Child Therapy Unit consists
of a psychiatrist in-charge, three clinical
assistant psychiatrists, a psychologist
and a social worker. Major emphasis is
given to therapy or guidance for parents
of children under treatment. Such treatment is usually focused on considering
the parents’ reaction to the child’s prob—
lems, or the parents’ role in the origin
of the difﬁculty. In the nine months of
1959 during which this clinic was in
operation, forty children plus their parents were seen in complete diagnostic
evaluation. Fifteen children and their
parents were accepted for treatment in
this facility.
A variety of after-care services have
been developed for Hillside Hospital’s
former patients. The Foster Home Care
Project with the Jewish Community
Services of Long Island; the After-Care
Clinic which is part of our own Out-Patient service and is provided at Mt. Sinai
Hospital; a supportive social case work
service with the Jewish Family Services
of New York; and a rehabilitation center,
“The Bridge,” which provides a resocialization program and supports the
Hilda and Israel Strauss League of former patients.

�x»

�The need for well-trained personnel in
the ﬁeld of psychiatry cannot be overstated. Recent years have seen the devel—
oping awareness of the assistance which
psychiatric knowledge can bring to the
broad spectrum of human problems. All
of the specialties of medicine are becoming
increasingly aware of the psychiatric elements in the etiology and treatment of
physical disease. In the ﬁeld of public
health, education, and welfare, psychiatry
is playing a role of ever increasing importance. Further, public acceptance of the
practice of psychiatry and the advances
made in this ﬁeld make mandatory the
provision of suﬂicient personnel to meet
the nation ’s mental health needs.
Hillside Hospital, because of its relatively small size and carefully selected
patient population, is ideally suited to
develop and share psychiatric knowledge.
In accepting its responsibilities for the
training of psychiatric personnel, Hillside Hospital is helping to meet the need
not only for trained psychiatrists, but
also for related professional personnel in
the ﬁeld of mental health.
In order to meet the increased need for
psychiatrists, Hillside Hospital expanded
its teaching program in 1959. The number
of psychiatrists in training was increased
from eighteen to twenty-ﬁve in a teaching
program that is expected to require three
years for completion. The residency pro—

gram itself was improved by the inclusion
of training in out-patient care and in
research.
Historically, the In-Patient Service of
Hillside Hospital has not only provided
quality patient care, but has also afforded
the means for the training of psychiatric
staff. The reorganization of the treatment
service in 1959 provided for better patient
care. The development of discreet administrative patient units affords the psychiatrist in training an opportunity to
develop sound therapeutic relationships
with an integral patient group. Furthermore, this arrangement allows the development of equally sound relationships
between resident and supervising psychiatrists, resident and nursing staff, and
resident and activities therapist, thus providing not only a good therapeutic milieu,
but a more salutary training milieu.

TREATMENT
TRAINING

RESEARCH

To provide for the training of psychi-

atric residents in the treatment of other
than the hospitalized patients, the OutPatient Department now provides the
resident with a learning experience which
is similar to that which the psychiatrist
has in his ofﬁce practice. This program,
which was initiated in 1959, provides for
the training of ﬁve psychiatric residents,
who function part time during the third
year of their psychiatric residency. Supervision by the Director of the Out—Patient
Department and members of his staff
obtains in planned individual and group

conferences.
To provide for the development of increased knowledge and skills by practicing psychiatrists in the local community,
a planned program has been developed.
Clinical assistants who are actively in the
practice of psychiatry, receive further
training under the supervision of the Director of the Out-Patient Department and
members of the attending staff.
The Child Therapy Unit which was
initiated in 1959, also serves a signiﬁcant
additional training function for practicing psychiatrists in the community. Three
clinical assistants, who spend half their
time in this clinic, receive individual
supervision as a function of the Director
of the Child Therapy Unit and from other
highly trained psychiatrists. Clinical conferences, seminars and reading conferences, team meetings, planning conferences and psychiatric staff conferences
provide further for the teaching program.

���Research at Hillside Hospital in 1959 was
carried out not only in three departments
whose function lies primarily with re—
search, but in addition, clinical studies
were carried out by individuals of various
professional departments.
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY

The study program in the Department
of Experimental Psychiatry increasingly
focused on the drug treatment process.
Based on an extensive experience with
newer drugs for mental illness, a detailed
drug evaluation study was started in
the fall. The selection of treatment, and
behavioral, psychiatric, psychologic, neurophysiologic and sociologic aspects of
change are being investigated. These examinations are undertaken to learn how
drugs inﬂuence mentally ill patients, and
to test a theory developed in this Department in 1956. In this theory, drugs are
seen to affect behavior by changing both
brain function and the psychologic attitudes of subjects.
In the experimental psychology studies,
increasing emphasis has been placed on
individual differences in perceptual and
cognitive behavior as related to the type
of behavioral response with treatment.
Study of these indices as predictors of
change in addition to the usual use of
indices of the effects of the treatment has
demonstrated signiﬁcant relationships.
The introduction of an electronic frequency analyzer of the Ulett-Loeffel type

in August, 1959—a device to rapidly
measure the various electrical waves
recorded from the brain—signiﬁcantly
expanded the electro-encephalographic
14

program. An analysis of changes in the
various patterns in the EEG made possible the critical and more precise determination of neurophysiologic effects of
various drugs. During the year, 404 records were recorded, and of these, 59 were
clinical consultation requests.
The sociologic programs undertook an
analysis of the differences in patient attitude to treatment of the various staff
groups, as the resident doctors, nurses,
social workers, etc. ; tolerance of the staff
for different types of emotional upset
and referral for somatic treatment; and
changes in the Hillside Hospital patient
population between 1957 and 1959. In
order to understand the relation of social
factors to the treatment of mental illness,
an elaborate tri-hospital study comparing
sociologic characteristics, treatment referral rates and discharge ratings in the
Menninger Foundation, the Massachus—
sets Mental Health Center and Hillside
Hospital was begun.

TREATMENT
TRAINING

RESEARCH

In language studies—an area that is
receiving increased attention in psychiatry—the staff organized and participated in a unique seminar at the New

York Divisional Meeting of the American
Psychiatric Association. Various psycholinguistic experts employing their individual methods of study, analyzed two
tapes of an analytic treatment, and compared their results. They showed the value
of combined methods in providing an
objective measure of the psychotherapy
process.
Eighteen reports were published during the year and eleven papers were presented before the national societies. The
staff was instrumental in the organization
of the New York Divisional Meeting of
the American Psychiatric Association,
and presented reports at four of its symposia. The staff also participated in the
International Conference on Depression
and Allied States that was held in March
in Montreal.
Changes in staff during the year included the appointment of George Krauthamer, Ph.D. as neurophysiologist, and
Donald F. Klein, MD. as psychiatrist to
the Department. Dr.' Robert L. Kahn,
after ﬁve years of service, left to assume
the position of Head of the Section of
Psychology, Division of Psychiatry of
Monteﬁore Hospital. Dr. Joseph Jaffe,
while continuing as an Associate in Research in this department, assumed the
position of Faculty Member and Associate
Director of Research of the William Alanson White Institute.

�Continuing support for the program
was obtained from the Board of Trustees,
extensive program support from the National Institute of Mental Health of the
United States Public Health Service, and
with grants from the Mental Health
Board of Nassau County.
BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH

Biochemical research was focused on aromatic substances in the urine of psychiatric patients and on the metabolism of the
newer psychotropic and hallucinogenic
drugs. For many years, the possibility
that psychiatric patients excrete compounds not present in normal subjects
has provided the basis for special studies.
This program analyzes urine samples for
a wide range of chemical substances which
are similar to known hormones. It attempts to determine whether psychiatric

patients from Hillside Hospital and

Creedmoor State Hospital differ from
normal subjects.
With the widespread use of new drugs
in psychiatry, it has been important to
determine the way these compounds affect
metabolism. One program has been devoted to tracing the changes which chlorpromazine undergoes in the body. For
this study, special techniques of analysis
for chlorpromazine derivatives have been
developed. The focus now is in relating
the kinds of derivatives and the rate with
which they are produced to their clinical
effects.

The metabolites of adrenalin are the
object of another study with the Medical
Department. In patients receiving the
Mecholyl Test, urine samples are analyzed
before and after the test for various derivatives of adrenalin. Blood studies to
determine the enzymes responsible for
changing adrenalin are in progress. Recently, a special colorimetric technique
for O-methyl transferase was developed.
In experimental animals, as well as in
the laboratory, the metabolism of hallucinogenes has been studied. Derivatives of
lysergic acid related to the vitamin B
complex and have been produced and are
being tested for hallucinogenic activity
and metabolic pathways.
MEDICAL RESEARCH

The major efforts of medical research in
1959 continued to be directed toward an
understanding of the mechanism of the
Mecholyl Test. The reliability of the
Mecholyl Test, using newly developed
equipment for recording blood pressure,
ﬁrst was undertaken. These studies demonstrated that the two initial readings of
the test were reliable measures. They, furthermore, established the limits of change
in the test as a basis for continued studies.
In addition, in co-operation with the Biochemistry Department, a study of the
relation of metabolites of adrenalin to
this test was begun. In the drug evaluation program, the Medical Department
assumed control of new medications and
of a variety of physiological tests. These
included the electrocardiogram and liver
and thyroid function studies, as well as
the Mecholyl Test.

CLINICAL STUDIES

A study of the factors affecting the
selection of somatic treatment, Drs. A.

Kaplan and H. Lefkowits noted that the
recommendations for special treatment
were as often based on extra medical factors as on the type of behavior of the
patient. They described various degrees
of symptoms and tolerances for different

behaviors.
In the Out-Patient Department, Dr. R.
Luttrell and his staff have been interested
in the prognostic factors in selecting pa-

tients for Out-Patient Department treat-

ment.
Mr. Lurie and Miss Pinsky of the Social
Service Department have done a follow-up
study of Hillside Hospital patients who
have been referred to The Foster Care
Program. The results of this study have
been gratifying in terms of the evaluation
of the program and of the indication of
future direction.
In clinical psychology a special study
of the psychological characteristics of
post-partum depressive reactions was

instituted.
Toward the end of 1959, an extensive
review of the Pavilion for Adolescent
Girls, a pilot program in this ﬁeld, was
prepared for publication in the ensuing
year.

I5

�efforts of the
Hillside Hospital staff in the
area of research will be seen in
the following listing of
publications and presentations.
BLUMBERG, A.—Use of
An Automatic
Sphygmomanometer in the
Mecholyl Test,
Journal of Hillside Hospital,
Vol. 8, #3, pp 179,
An index of the

July, 1959

BLUMBEEG, A., ROSETT,
and DOBROW, A.—Severe

Holland, Amsterdam,
pp. 238-239
PINK, M. KAHN, R.L. and
KORIN, H.—Therapy of
Schizophrenia: Role of
Alteration of Brain Function
on Behavior, Congress
Reports, II Int. Cong.

Psychiatry,

II:

492-493

and
KORIN, H.—Relation of Tests
of Altered Brain Function to
Behavioral Change Following

FINK, M. KAHN, R.L.

In’duced Convulsions,

The First International
Congress of Neurological
Sciences (III: EEG, Clinical
of Internal Medicine, Vol 51, Neurophysiology and
#3, pp 607, September, 1959 Epilepsy), Pergamon,
613-619
London,
M.——Effect
pp.
of
an
PINK,
Anticholinergic Agent,
PINK, M.——EEG and
Behavioral Effects of
Diethazine, on EEG and
Tofranil, International
Behavior; Signiﬁcance for
Conference on Depression
Theory of Convulsive
and Allied States, Montreal
Therapy. Biological
Psychiatry, ed. Masserman, PINK, M.—Language
J ., Grune and Stratton, N. Y. Patterns as Measures of
pp. 184—194
Behavioral and
Neurophysiologic Change,
rINK, M.—Alteration of
Brain Function in Therapy. American Psychiatric
Association, Philadelphia
Psychopharmacology
Frontiers, ed. Kline, N.,
FISHMAN-GOLDENBERG,
Little, Brown 85 00., Boston, v., SPOERRI, mar—Coloripp. 325-332
metric Determination of
Dicarbozylic Acid
rINK, M.——Signiﬁcance of
Derivatives as Hydroxamic
EEG Pattern Changes in
Acids, Anal. Chem. 31:
Psychopharmacology. EEG
Clin. N europhysiol. 2:
1735, 1959.

Hypotensive Reactions
to Overdosage of
MeprobamatHThe Annals

398 (abst.)
rINK, M.—Electro-

encephalographic and
Behavioral Effects of
Tofranil. Canad. Psych.

Assoc. J. 4: 1668-1718
rINK, M. KAHN, R.L. and

GOLDENBERG, 11., FISHMAN, v.,
WHIT’I‘IER, J., BRINI'EZER, W.

—Urinary Aromatic
Excretion Patterns in
Schizophrenia A.M.A.
Arch Gen. Psychiat., in press
GOLDENBERG, H, WHITE,

D.L.--

Colorimetric Determination
Factors Affecting Individual of O-Methyl Transferase.
Diﬁerences in Behavioral
Presented at the 126th
Response to Convulsive
Meeting of the American
Association for the
Therapy, J .N .M.D. 128:
243-248
Advancement of Science,
1959
December
27,
Chicago,
and
R.L.
M.
KAHN,
PINK,
KORIN, H.—Eﬂ’ects of Diffuse GOLDENBERo, H., FISHMAN, v.
Altered Brain Function on
—Chromatographic Studies
Perception. Proc. X V Int.
of Chlorpromazine Metabolism in Man. Presented at
the 126th Meeting of the
American Association for
the Advancement of Science,
Chicago, Dec. 27, 1959

POLLACK, M.—-—Psychologica1

of
Threshold and Duration of Social Attitude to Psychiatric
Seizures to Degree of EEG
Treatment, N.Y. Divisional
Meeting, A.P.A., New York
Delta Activity Induced
During Electroshock, EEG.
KAHN, R. L., with WEINSTEIN,
Clin. N curophysiol. 2:
E. A. and BERGMAN, P.——Effect
(Abst.)
of Electroconvulsive
Therapy on Intractable Pain.
JAFFE, J.—-—Communication
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and
Networks in Freud’s
Psychiat. 81 : 37-42
Interview Technique,
Psych. Quat. 32: 456-473
KAHN, R. L., with WEINSTEIN,
E. A.——Symbolic ReorganizaJAFFE, J.——Symposium on
‘‘
tion in Brain Injuries, in
Psycholinguistic Analysis
Handbook of Psychiatry, ed.
of the Psychiatric
Interview ’ ’, Divisional
Arieti, S. Basic Books,
N. Y., Vol. I, pp. 964-981
Meeting, A.P.A. New York
KARP, E.—Behavioral Changes
JAF‘FE, J.——Social Backwith Different Methods of
ground and the DoctorPatient Relationship, Acad. Induced Cerebral Dysfunction, Eastern
Psychoanalysis, New York
Psychological Association,
KAHN, R.L. and BLACK, M.—
Atlantic
City
of
Application
Prognostic
Psychological Techniques in KORIN, H. and FINK, M.—
The role of Set in the
Convulsive Therapy,
Dis. N erv. Sys. 30: 180-184 Perception of Simultaneous
A.
Tactile
Jour,
Stimuli,
and
R.
POLLACK,
M.,
L.,
KAHN,
384-392
72:
Psychol.
M.—Sociopsychologic
FINK,
KRAUTHAMER, G.—Form
Aspects of Psychiatric
Perception Across Sensory
Treatment in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital; Duration Modalities, Am. Psychol. 14 :
of Hospitalization, Discharge 396 (Abst.)
Ratings and Diagnosis,
KRAU’I‘KAMER, G.———Personality
A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. Correlates of EEG,
1 : 565-574
Metropolitan EEG Society,
New York
KAHN, R. L., and PINK, M.—
Personality Factors in
LEVINE, A.—A Comparative
Behavioral Response to
Evaluation of Latent and
Electroshock Therapy,
Overt Schizophrenic Patients
J. Neuropsychiatry 1: 45-49 with Respect to the Concept
KAHN, R. L.—Socioof Ego Strength. Journal
psychologic Factors
of Hillside Hospital, VIII,
Affecting Therapist-Patient No. 4, Oct. 1959, pp. 243-266
Relationships, American
LEVINE, A.—“App1'aising
Academy of Psychoanalysis, ego-strength from the
Philadelphia
projective test battery”
KAHN, R. L.—Socio——Society for
psychologic Aspects of
Projective Techniques,
Psychiatric Treatment,
New York, May 1959
Eastern Psychological
Association, Atlantic City

Cong. Psychol., Publ. North- GREEN, M.—Relationship of

KAHN, R. L.—Re1ation

STAFF
PUBLICATIONS
AND

.

.

16
.m_............,,....

PRESENTATIONS

LEVY,

E.—The Role of the

Volunteer In The Treatment
Program of a Mental
Hospital, Social Work with
Groups, 1959, (New York
Natl. Assoc. of Social
Workers), pp 109-119
LURIE, A., HIRSCH,

8.—

Establishing a Hospital
Social Service Department,
Journal of Social Work
(Vol. IV, No. 2—April 1959)
‘
A.-—‘
Structure of
LURIE,
Field Work Training”

Workshop, Council on Social
Work Education,

Philadelphia, Pa.,
January, 1959
LURIE, A.—“The Use of
Group Process Within
Medical Settings”. National
Conference of Jewish
Communal Service,
Pittsburgh, Pa., May 1959

‘Forecasting the
Place and Role of the Aging
in our Society during the
next decade”. Little White
House Conference on Aging,
sponsored by the Community
Council of Greater New York,
LURIE,

A.——‘

December 1959
POLLACK, M.—Effect of
Induced Cerebral Dysfunction in Man on
Tachistoscopic Perception of
Embedded Color Figures,
Eastern Psychologic
Association. Atlantic City

POLLACK, M. with BENDER,
M. B., and BATTERSBY, W. s.—

Complex Visual Perception

in Patients with Brain
Tumor. Proc. XV Int. Cong.
Psychol., Publ. NorthHolland, Amsterdam,
pp. 236-237
POLLACK, M.~—‘ ‘ Comparison
of Intellectual Functioning
in Childhood,” Adolescent
and Schizophrenics, N. Y.
Divisional Meeting, A.P.A.,
New York
STAHL, ALICE—”The Role of
the Psychiatrist in the
Adolescent Pavilion. ’ ’
Midwinter Divisional
Meeting of A.P.A.

��The past years has been one in which the
Medical Board has shared in the period
of transition now in progress at Hillside
Hospital. Acting in an advisory and consultative capacity, the Board has aided
the Medical Director and the Board of
Trustees in bringing into sharp focus the
aims and aspirations of Hillside Hospital :
to become a leading center for psychiatric
treatment, training and research.
In keeping with the current spirit of
transition at Hillside Hospital, the Medical Board has done considerable soul
searching in order to reappraise its role
in the affairs of the hospital. The Board
is comprised of people who are outstanding in the ﬁelds of psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Some of its members are
training analysts on the faculties of the
three Psychoanalytic Institutes in New
York City. Others have achieved aca-

demic distinction as members of medical
school faculties and hospital staffs. It is

expected that gradual evolutionary

changes will take place which will enhance the value of this reservoir of psychiatric experience and knowledge. In the
past it has made major contributions to
the academic deveIOpment of Hillside Hospital. Together with the devoted membership of our chiefs of Medicine, Surgery
and Dentistry, the Board is a source of
expert advice in the major activities of
the hospital.
The year has brought other changes,
too. Dr. Sidney Tarachow, the first editor of the Journal of Hillside Hospital,
has retired as the Journal’s guiding light,
after ten years of unﬂagging devotion.
Under his direction the Journal has become an outstanding contributor to the
body of scientiﬁc knowledge and literature. It is expected that in the near future
an issue of the Journal will be dedicated
to Dr. Tarachow, as a token of our appreciation, esteem and affection. Dr.
Aaron Stein of our Board has succeeded
as editor.
The various committees under the able
direction of their chairmen have continued to function energetically in the
many areas noted in previous years. To
them and to the attending and visiting

REPORT OF
THE PRESIDENT
OF THE
18

MEDICAL BOARD
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.

staffs I offer deepest thanks for their advice and co-operation. I particularly Wish
to express my compliments to Mr. Alvin
E. Coleman, the President of the Board
of Trustees, and to Dr. Lewis L. Robbins,
the Medical Director, for their valued and
rewarding relationship to the Board.
Conferences with these men and their
dedicated colleagues have always been
stimulating, informative and constructive.
In closing, I take extreme pleasure in
welcoming Dr. Sidney Tarachow to the
Presidency of the Medical Board. He will
give it the energetic devotion it so much
deserves.

�MEDICAL BOARD

President

Robert A. Savitt, M.D.*
President-Elect
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.*
Secretary
Sidney L. Green, M.D.*
Treasurer

Paul Scheman, D.D.S.*

Eat-President
M. David Epstein, M.D.*

Psychiatrists

Samuel Atkin, M.D.
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.*
M. David Epstein, M.D.*
Margaret E. Fries, M.D.
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.*
George S. Goldman, M.D.
Sidney L. Green, M.D.*
William Karliner, M.D.*
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.
Sarah B. Kelman, M.D.
Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Samuel R. Lehrman, M.D.
Joseph S. A. Miller, M.D.
Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.
Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.*
Lawrence J. Roose, M.D.
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.*
Martin Schreiber, M.D.*
Isidor Silbermann, M.D.
Otto Sperling, M.D.
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.*

Non-Psychiatrists
Director of
Department of Medicine
Lester Cohen, M.D.*
Director of
Department of Surgery
Sidney Hirsch, M.D.*

Director of
Department of Dentistry
Paul Scheman, D.D.S.*
CHAIRMAN OF
STANDING COMMITTEES

Adolescent Pavilion
Sidney L. Green, M.D.
Credentials Committee for

Psychiatric Attending Staff
Promotions
Martin Schreiber, M.D.
&amp;

Credentials Committee for
Non-Psychiatric Visiting
Staff &amp; Promotions

Paul Scheman, D.D.S.
Education of Resident Staﬂ"
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.
Group Psychotherapy
Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.

Manhattan A fter-Care Clinic
Sarah B. Kelman, M.D.
Queens Out-Patient Clinic
Martin H. Orens, M.D.
Sub-Committee for Child

Guidance Clinic
Isidor Bernstein, M.D.
Research Committee
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.
Publications Committee
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.
Committee for
Adjunctive Services
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.
Credentials Committee for
Supervising Psychiatric
and Resident Staﬂ‘
Lawrence J. Roose, M.D.
CONSULTING, A‘ITENDING
AND VISITING STAFF-'5

Consultants

Psychiatry
Leonard Blumgart, M.D.?
Sandor Lorand, M.D.
Nathaniel E. Selby, M.D.

Dudley D. Schoenfeld, M.D.
Medicine

Alfred Angrist, M.D.
Morris S. Bender, M.D.

Oscar Levin, M.D.
I. Jesse Levy, M.D.

YNeurology
A. M. Rabiner, M.D.
Hans Strauss, M.D.
I. S. Wechsler, M.D.

Surgery
David Warshaw, M.D.
Gynecology

Julius Jarcho, M.D.
Dentistry
Morris Fierstein, D.D.S.
Attendings

Attending Psychiatrists
Samuel Atkin, M.D.
Frank Berchenko, M.D.
Isidor Bernstein, M.D.
Arnold Eisendorfer, M.D.

M. David Epstein, M.D.
Margaret E. Fries, M.D.
I. Peter Glauber, M.D.
George S. Goldman, M.D.
Paul Goolker, M.D.
Sidney L. Green, M.D.
William Karliner, M.D.
Sylvan Keiser, M.D.
Sarah R. Kelman, M.D.
Emanuel Klein, M.D.
Samuel R. Lehrman, M.D.
Abraham S. Lenzner, M.D.
Joseph S. A. Miller, M.D.

Martin H. Orens, M.D.

Samuel Z. Orgel, M.D.

Hyman L. Rachlin, M.D.
Lawrence J. Roose, M.D.
Robert A. Savitt, M.D.
Martin Schreiber, M.D.
Isidor Silbermann, M.D.
Otto Sperling, M.D.
Aaron Stein, M.D.
Sidney Tarachow, M.D.
Associate Attending

Psychiatrists

Renato J. Almansi, M.D.
Alexander J. Friedman, M.D.

Soll Goodman, M.D.
Louis Kaywin, M.D.
Bruce Kendall, M.D.

Geraldine Pederson-Krag, M.D.
William W. Pike, M.D.
Jay Stanton, M.D.
Adjunct Attending

Psychiatrists
Edward R. Adelson, M.D.
Herman S. Alpert, M.D.
Alvin B. Balaban, M.D.
Irving L. Bauer, M.D.
Benjamin J. Becker, M.D.
Julius Belinkoff, M.D.

Milton M. Berger, M.D.
Lionel H. Blackman, M.D.

Rita M. Chalef, M.D.:t
Isadore H. Cohn, M.D.
Irving J. Crain, M.D.
Joseph H. Feldman, M.D.
Jules Glenn, M.D.
Albert E. Goldberg, M.D.
Michael Gould, M.D.i
Albert Harrison, M.D.
Thomas Hora, M.D.
Wilbur Jarvis, M.D.i
Abraham I. Kaplan, M.D.
Eugene H. Kaplan, M.D.
George R. Krupp, M.D.
Peter Laderman, M.D.

Myer D. Mendelson, M.D.*
David Milrod, M.D.
Helene Papanek, M.D.

Henry Rosner, M.D.t
Irving Salan, M.D.
Frederick F. Shevin, M.D.
Fred U. Tate, M.D.

B. Frank Voge], M.D.*
Leonard Weinroth, M.D.
Herbert Wieder, M.D.
VISITINGS

Medicine

Director
Lester Cohen, M.D.
Visiting Physicians
George Sabrin, M.D.
Louis Rosenblum, M.D.
Arnold G. Blumberg, M.D.
Associate Physician
Jerome Weinstein, M.D.
Adjunct Physicians
Arnold L. Berger, M.D.
Wilbur B. Brett, M.D.
Associate Dermatologist
Joel Schweig, M.D.
Adjunct Dermatologists
Norman Goldfarb, M.D.
Eugene L. Bodian, M.D.
Neurology

Associate Neurologist
Kurt Adler, M.D.

MEMBERS

OFTHE

MEDICAL
BOARD

Gynecology

Visiting Gynecologist
Marie P. Warner, M.D.
Associate Gynecologists

Jack Cohen, M.D.
Bernard Greenblat, M.D.

Rodlology

Visiting Radiologist
Bernard Epstein, M.D.
Associate Radiologist
Paul Steinhorn, M.D.
Optometry
Staﬂ‘ Optometrists
Edward L. Steinberg, O.D.
Bernard Attinson, O.D.
Podiatry
Staﬁ’ Podiatrist

William Reider, Pod.O.

Surgery

Director
Sidney Hirsch, M.D.
Adjunct Surgeon
Stephen Deckoﬂ", M.D.
Visiting Neurosurgeon
Joseph Siris, M.D.
Visiting Urologist
Daniel Kaufman, M.D.
Adjunct Urologist
Albert Sutton, M.D.
Visiting Orthopedist
A. H. Lewert, M.D.
Associate Orthopedist
Julius Schneiderman, M.D.
Visiting Proctologist
Benjamin Warner, M.D.
Visiting Ophthalmologist
Edward Seretan, M.D.
Associate Ophthalmologist
Arthur Minsky, M.D.
Visiting Otolaryngologist
Sam Clayton, M.D.

Visiting Anesthesiologist
Georges Bean, M.D.
Dentistry

Director
Paul Scheman, D.D.S.
Associate Director

J. Gordon Rubin, D.D.S.

Associate Dentists
Benjamin Schwaid, D.D.S.
Bernard Lebow, D.D.S.
Adjunct Dentists
Henry Lewis, D.D.S.
Samuel Plotnick, D.D.S.
Elsa Friedman, D.D.S.
Martin Protell, D.D.S.
Leon Basson, D.D.S.
Herbert Forman, D.D.S.
*Executive Committee Member
f Deceased 1959
IAppointed in 1959

19

�The body of our Annual Report indicates that 1959 was a year
in which the Professional Development Program, introduced
by Dr. Lewis L. Robbins, was launched. The goals of the program have been outlined and the beginnings of its implementation have been described above. Additional personnel required
by this program were initially engaged as of July, 1959, and
were gradually added during the second half of the year, so
that the 1959 calendar year data does not show appreciable expenditures for the Professional Development Program as such.
COMPARISON OF COSTS

1958-1959
1958

— TOTAL OPERATION

1959

%

INCREASE
16.

Salaries
$1,241,350.
$1,442,458.
3.
Food
127,142.
131,083.
Maintenance
and Grounds
( 8.)
78,914.
72,408.
Administration
29.
Expenses
111,300.
143,860.
Medical Supplies
55,217.
49,289.
(11.)
Repairs and
Replacements
48,101.
41,727.
(13.)
13.
Total
$1,662,024.
$1,880,825.
This table shows that the total expenditures for all operations
increased by 13%; the percentage increase from 1957 to 1958
was 11%.
Salaries and wages increased by 16%. This is in keeping with
our experience of the past ten years in which this item rose by
ten to ﬁfteen percent per year. Almost the entire rise in this
ﬁgure was caused by increases in rates rather than by the addition of new positions. The chief factors in this increase were
the across-the-board increase of about 13% to all nonprofessional
employees and provision of time and one-half for overtime for
all employees. These actions were taken by the Board of Trustees
in accordance with the “Statement of Policy Regarding Personnel Practices” promulgated by the Greater New York Hospital Association and subscribed to by the Board of Trustees.
Increased salaries were also provided for all categories of the
professional staff. The impact of the Professional Development
Program as such was hardly felt in 1959 ; its further implementation will produce a more appreciable impact during 1960.
.

20

Food costs increased 3% in accordance with the rise in the
food price index.
Out-patient services expenses increased by only 6% as compared with 30% in 1957 and 21% in 1958. This reﬂects the stabilization of this operation after a period of constant growth
dating back to 1954 when the large Queens Out-Patient Service
was established.
The largest increase was in administration expenses which
rose by $32,000, or 29%. The following were the chief components of this increase:
INCREASE IN DOLLARS

ITEM
Ofﬁce Equipment

$3,500
Medical Care Prepayment for Employees 8,000
Social Security and Retirement
Contributions
9,300
Personnel Expenses
6,300,
Medical Care Prepayment for employees (Blue Cross and
Blue Shield coverage for the employees and their families) was
initiated in July, 1959 as part of our over-all improvement of
personnel practices. Social Security and retirement contributions rose both as to rate and volume. Personnel expenses rose
in accordance with liberalized policies as to travel and other
allowances for professional staff.
SERVICE DATA: IN-PATIENTS

Total number of
patients treated
Total patient days
Average income per
patient day
Average cost per
patient day
Average loss per patient
per day

1958

1959

%

INCREASE

—
——

536
70,691

537
70,219

$16.58

$18.83

+

13.5%

$18.73

$21.69

+

15.8%

$ 2.15

$ 2.86

+

33%

REPORT OF
THE ADMINISTRATOR
Maurice Bachrach

�With total number of patients treated and the number of
patient days virtually unchanged, average income per patient
day rose by 13.5% while average cost per patient day rose
by 15.8%. The average loss per patient day rose by 33%
over 1958. Thus, In-Patient Service developed a gross operating deﬁcit of $200,826 for the year in spite of an increase of
$4.00 in the per diem rate paid for indigent patients by the City of
New York as of July 1. Without this increase, this loss ﬁgure
would have been appreciably higher, since 75% of our In-Patient
Service (50,000 patient days) is assigned to indigent patients.
Most of our deﬁcit both for In-Patient and Out-Patient Services was met by a grant from the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, while an increasingly large deﬁcit is being
met by our own trustees. Our Board of Trustees meets the
operating deﬁcit for treatment and training programs as well
as for research, which is their sole responsibility. As we continue
to put more and more of the Professional Development Program
into action, our gross expenditures for the In-Patient Service
will continue to out-run foreseeable increase in operating
income. Closest integration of planning and effort between the
hospital administration, our Board of Trustees and the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York can lead to construetive solutions of the support problems which lie ahead during
the next few years. The most potent ingredient of such integration is close agreement as to the hospital’s goals as they have
been expressed in the programs promulgated by Dr. Robbins
in 1958 and 1959. These goals promise the provision of the
highest attainable level of patient care and are so incontravertible, that they must stimulate all concerned to meet them in
spite of the difficulties to be encountered.
The growth of the professional programs must be accompanied
by parallel development of administrative services. Careful
application of sound administrative procedures to every phase
of all of our programs will tend to make these programs more
effective and to introduce elements of management that can
decrease cost without impairing service.
During 1959, Mr. Samuel Davis joined our staff as Assistant
Administrator. We willnow be able to plan for increased appli-

cation of administrative processes in the professional areas.
More time and effort will be available for improvement and
intensiﬁcation of personnel administration. An important function for administration during the next year will be to develop
major projects in conjunction with Dr. Robbins and the professional staff and appropriate board committees, a master plan
outlining the physical development of the hospital for at least
ﬁfteen years ahead, a survey of existing plant and buildings
and a comprehensive site plan leading to the development of a
research building and an activities therapy building.
The hospital’s administration will continue to maintain constructive relationships with community agencies such as the
Nassau County and New York City Community Mental Health
Boards and the various co-operating social agencies, as well as
Long Island Jewish Hospital. Efforts to intensify and improve
the areas of co-operation will continue. The board has already
authorized the creation of an effective public relations program
which will lead to wider and more productive community participation in the life of the Hospital and greater usefullness of
the hospital in the life of the community.
The task of administration during 1959 has been a great one.
None of our accomplishments and none of our plans for the
future would have been possible without the devoted and intelligent assistance of the department heads who worked so closely
with us. It is therefore more than appropriate to state that Mrs.
Angelina Canavan, Dietitian; Mrs. Dorothy Croghan, Accounting Supervisor; Mrs. Lillian Dailey, Ofﬁce Manager; Mr.
Thomas R. Lumley, Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds;
and Mrs. Sarah Travers, Executive Housekeeper supplied the
basic day-to-day services which provided an essential foundation
on which professional programs are built. They worked unceasingly with sometimes inadequate staff, to meet the challenge
presented by the growing Professional Development Program
of the hospital.

21

�The following professional

and nonprofessional employees
supported the treatment,
training and research goals of
the Hillside Hospital in 1959:
PROFESSIONAL

Biochemical Research
Dr. Vivian Goldenberg
Grace Kittel
Susan Rea
Dr. Bernard Searle
Daniel White
Creative Therapy
Edith Zierer
Dental Technician
Sheila Berger

Experimental Psychiatry
Romeo Cartolano
Dr. Robert Kahn
Eric Karp
Dr. Donald Klein
Jean Kolodny
Dr. George Krauthamer
Hanna Mosquera
Dr. Max Pollack
Dr. Nathaniel Siege]

Intramural Clinic
Laura Zaves
Laboratories
Theresa Midulla
Medical Librarian
Ellin Resnick

Nursing Service
Registered Nurses
Frances Anderson

Susie Mae Behlmer
Marie Caﬁero

Kathleen Cliggett
Mary Cressy
Mary Ann Dalton
Ann Dispensa

Jean Hendry
Nancy Jeff eries

Mary Jones
Sandra Kraner
Grace Lyons
Eleanor MacPhillips
Flora Mae McCartney
Catherine McCormick
Helen Murray
Yolande Paquet

Lorraine Schaeﬂ’er

Helen Schippicase
Rose Schulbaum
Suzanne Smith
Barbara Steinbach
Zurline Thornhill
Edith Titolo
Anna Urbach
Helen Ziegler
Licensed Practical Nurses
Alma Clinton
Mary Corrigan
Hope Fox
Theresa Howard
Alice McDonough

Isabell Pierce

Rosemary Stevenson
Gloria Swan

Catherine Wall
Delores Williams
Psychiatric Aides
Martha Adams
Olga Allen
Marion Bell
Patricia Bell
William Black, Jr.
Beatrice Blake
Annie J. Bond
Joseph Britt
Lawrence Burger
Frances Butler
Sylvester Campbell
Frederick Coley
May Conrad
Teresa Cooney
Naomi Cotter
Hugh Cracker

�Catherine Eames
Annie Ervin
James Faulkner
Janie Ferguson
Marion Flood
Irish Ford
William Godett
Margaret Griller
Katherine Hammel
Mabel Harper
Linda Hart
Pauline Hawkes
George Heller
Sandra Heller
Lawrence Hood
Alberta Hopkins
Ellen Kennedy
Joan Kelley
Asalle Kirby
Carole Kornfeld
Doris Kraemer
Josephine Lafayette
Ernest Lambert
Grace Lau
Leslie Lee
Miriam Lee
Alice Leliukevicz
Ella Mae Leonard
Lillian Leslie
Anna Lewin
Georgine Lohman
Ellen Long
James Merrill
Edith Minor
Bertha Monroe
Helen Olsen
Clemmie Palmer
Elizabeth Rodriguez
Barbara Sang
Lessie Mae Scott
Samuel Scott
Mildred Shaw
Nancy Smith
Virginia Smith
Marian Thomas
August Tosi
Martha Visalli
Catherine Williams
Thomas Wolf
Anna Wolfberg
Leon Wolfberg
Edgar Zephyrine

Occupational Therapy
Karen Beutlich
Joseph Chase
J udity Conrad
Laura Dunlop
Martha Ittelson
Mona Jones
Deanna Levine
Mary Marrone
Doris Metzger
Helene VViller
Pharmacist
Robert M. Frank
Psychology
Ira Rosenblatt
Dr. Allan Sapolsky
Dr. Stanley Schiff
Charles Silver
Dr. Felix Steiner
Leonette Vanderhost
Florence Volkman
Social Services
Case Work Division
Ida Baumstein
Anne Connery
Barbara Fishman
Robert Fishman
Beatrice Freeman
Evelyn Furman
Sally Gold
Regina Goldstein
Selma Hornstein
Sarah Klionsky
Sandra Match
Anita Mehr
Sylvia Riback
Esther Sanders
Lita Schmidt
Seymour Silverberg
Sylvia Solovey
Gisela Tauber
Lewis White
Group Work Division
Aaron Beckerman
Frieda Bradlow
Denis Dryden

Judith Duﬂy
Edward Fitzgerald
Geraldine Lauter

Eli Saul Levy

Evelyn Mason
Naomi Miller
Holmes Morrison
William Pressman

Frances Rubinstein
Philip Schwartz
Virginia Zaremba
NON PROFESSIONAL

Accounting Department
Arline Fleischmann
Lillian Ingber
Henrietta Lyons
Ethel Siegelman
Jeanette Silver
Dorothy Strier
Buildings &amp; Grounds
Erich Brau
Walter Foley

Frank Groene

William Hannigan
Robert Hill
George Loblein
Nero Moyd
Stanley Novak
Edward Reeder
Frank Reinlein
Walter Roland, Jr.
William Roland, Sr.
John J. Rose
Albert Schmid
Joseph Seagren
Albert Senese
Dietary Services
George Canavan
Francesco Cannetto
Emma Casamassima

Flozell Clarke

Hubert Cooke

Thomas Duncan
Arthur Dywer

Pardo Faro
Elaine Fields
George Fields

Alphonse Gross

Ella Jacobs
Fred LaBarbera
Alfred Lemaire
Gaetano Mandala
Arthur Martin
Ida Novick
Martin Novick
Gaspari Orlando
George Perreta

Arthur Pitts
Walter Rodney

Eva Schwartz
Broadie Taylor
Thomas Tucker
Ester Watkins
Leroy Watkins
Housekeeping
Cle Anderson
Betty Bruckman
James Cuozzo
George Czinczinger
Stanley Durant
William Garland
Fulgencio Gerena
Nathaniel Glover
Joseph Hope
William Hyman
Robert Jones
Harry Lewis
Charles McLeod
Richard Newton
Roosevelt Mitchell

PROFESSIONAL
AND
NON PROFESSIONAL

EMPLOYEES

Dorothy 0 ’Berry
Arturo Orengo
Booker Richardson
Rafael Salazar
Agnes Schuster
General Walker
Ray Warren
Blanche White
Oﬁice Services
Irene Attinson
Celia Bernstein
John Borgner

Janet Bowie

Diane Brafman
Manuel Brown
Irene Dinkin
Claire Dubin
Regina Freedman
Lillian Freifeld
Norma Friedman
Edward Golove
Frances Gullo
Adele Harris
Sylvia Hymowitz
Joan Kase
Edna Kappes

Yetta Levitt
Inge Mai

Sylvia Marcella
Fradele Marcus
Yetta Mintz
Catherine Muﬁ
Dorothy McClary
Margaret 0 ’Connor
Mary Pignoni
Gloria Podrid
Frances Roth
Joseph Ryan
Dorothy Saults
Charlotte Sinovoi
Miriam Slater

Jeanette Sobel

Edna Telesca.
Walter Theisen
Edna Weissman
Lotte Wollman
Blanche Zaitz

23

��HILLSIDE
HOSPITAL

is licensed by.

. . . .

The New York State
Department of Mental Hygiene.

is approved for

resident training by... . .
Council on Medical Education
of The American Medical
Association
The American Board of
Psychiatry and Neurology.

is accredited by .

....

The American Psychiatric
Association
The Joint Commission on
Accreditation of Hospitals

is a member

of.....

The American Hospital
Association
Hospital Association of

New York State
Greater New York Hospital

Association
Greater New York Fund
The United Hospital Fund
Welfare and Health Council of
New York City
The National Conference of

Jewish Communal Services

cooperates with. . . . .
Adelphi College
Altro Workshops

Federation Employment and
Guidance Service
Jewish Community Service
of Long Island
Jewish Family Service
of New York
Long Island Jewish Hospital
New York City Board of

Education

New York State Employment

Service

New York State Department of

Vocational Rehabilitation
Queens College of the
City of New York

is a participating

hospital

IWhIle no precnse form

.....

and Related Facilities for

essential for making a valid bequest to HIIISIde Hospital, the
following may be used: give to the Society of the Hillside Hospital, the sum of $

TheHospitaICounciIof
Gr t rN wY rk
HI::;DEeHO:PITAL

I

ISAMEMBER OF

.

.

.

IS

.

.

.

.

.

,

I

land or any specn‘uc property, such as bonds, stocks, etcetera, IS given, a brief descrlpH
tion of the property should be inserted instead .of the phrase "the sum of
If

.

.

.

.

.

.

$____.

THE FEDERATION or
JEWISH PHILANTHROP'ES'

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67294">
                <text>Progress and annual reports; research activities (folder title).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67295">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67296">
                <text>mfp-03-01-001-0-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67297">
                <text>1960-1963</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67298">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67299">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67300">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67301">
                <text>Hillside Hospital Annual Report (published copies), 29th, 30th, 31st, 32nd; Hillside Hospital A Report of Progress, 1960/61; Letter; </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67302">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67303">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80932">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87493">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94054">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100615">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6735" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3788">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9060c539e20c3ba0581d3baa1fe2596c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>225bfe4d17bc385ee38289963bbb494a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="104414">
                    <text>l...“

I

3%

Protocol for Pilot Project. on Effect
of Drug on Corebrsl Emotion
‘

1. Object:
(a)
(b)

on
of dmgn

To

study the effect

To

observe the emotional responses to such ohangca

and

the perception of sensory stimuli;

in function.

first drug

selected is LSD-25 (Sandoa) - on erect preparation
which, in very minute doses, produces a time state with altered perceptions,
emotional reactions and occasionally hallucinatory phenomena.
Studies or
porcep’onol change-s in the visual, amnion", an! anaesthetic senses are planned.
Special enmhasis is to be placed on the more complex functions of spatial and
temporal orientation; discrimination of size and shape; body may; and the
perooption of multiple Simmons stimuli
.111.

(1)
(2)
(3)

(h)

In the emotional aphoro, the following questions are oonsidorud:
Are the emotional responses secondary to or simultanemm with the
perceptual changes?
Are the “spams: consistent in repeated exporinonta in each
In each class of oubjoabo?
subject?
Are the emotional moponooa related to personality structure in
Hal?
any predictable fashion?
In there any relation of the mouse to drug aotim and tho
ability of the subject to utilize the mohanisn of denial?

In addition, there are thornpoutio oonoidorations:
Dona 131) have org arrest on depressions?
fl;
2 Does 15]) have am- valun in eliciting pmhiatrio material in
bloom,- impressed subjects?

2. Subjects:

(a)

‘

The subjects are in
"Normal” controln~

at

three groups:
hospital yeraomol or hospitalized patients

a general hospital.

(b) Psychiatric subjects at Hillside

Hog)

(1 Depression a» psychotic anti
(2 Scbimphronin
(3 N9W1Co

ital:

“satin.

(o) Neurological subjects at Mt. Sinai Hospital:
(1) Cerebral (119%,me or diffuse.

cord
disease.
Spinal
£2)
3) Spinal root disease.

30

W05!

subject is to be heated in a similar fashion prior to drug
ingestion) during the period of drug activity; and after. Subjects
Each

tmatodhyESTandinsulinmtoboexanimddmingaxﬂaﬁortho

Repeated sessions with each subject
course of such treatments
As the drug action has a duration 0: 2 to 5 hours,
arc planned.
The testing new be divided
testing proceduren my be extensive.

into three mops:
Neurologcal.
a)
gb Modical.

c)

tholoacal.
‘\

�3a.. Neurological:

1. Routine neurological.-

2"

Visual.
Perception of color mixed and ambiguous figures taohistoscopi celly
exposed; and cation ion or relative size and distance.
.

,

‘

3. Tactile.
he

Double simultaneous stimulation or various

Amt”.
Perception

modalities.

of latrines” identification of sounds and estimation

of time intervals.
5. Special studies of bochr image.
Bbo

Medical:
Observation of the subjects by members of the Department of Medicine
has been ”quested (Dr. A. Blmberg) and is under consideration.
BiocheMcsl studios of hormonal studios secondary to drug activity
is under consideration, with emphasis on the possible role of
adrenal function in the reactions as measured to the pattern of
wxﬂtosteroid excretion.

3c. Psycholouoalt

Clinical psychological testing is considered an integral port 0
The cooperation of Dr. M. Ger-vita has been rethis survw.
An evaluation 0:: personality structure and habitual
quested,
methods of reaction to stress will be studied in each subject.
In addition, special testing procedures to study the mechanism
of denial are under stuck ha a. member of the psycholomstafrz:,-;LC
(lire Antinoph).

Specific testing procedures include the following tests:
a Rorschach.
b Bender Gestalt.
c
d

TvoTl
Special tests for denial.

he Supplies, Foods, Eton:
The drugs have been made available to me for experimental purposes;
Funds for the
at no charge kw Sundae Pharmaceutical Company.
equipmt moesssry for testing have been placed at my disposal
by the Neurological Research Fund of the Mt. Sinai Hospital.
The

following items are requested from Hillside Hospital:
(1) Office space and the use of one room in Treatment Dormitory
during experimental days.
(2) Availability of records and permission to request occasional
coowration of Homing Department and of the Record Room

staff.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67344">
                <text>Protocol for Pilot Project on Effect of Drugs on Cerebral Function, January 1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67345">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67346">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-1-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67347">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67348">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67349">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67350">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67351">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67352">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67353">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80937">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87498">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94059">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100620">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="268" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="59">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/8d591c235c58b9d455d7cbdd43d00916.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ebb607fbcf115668ef8fa3c0792cd5b3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100685">
                    <text>PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL
DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
TO CONVULSIVE THERAPY

MAX FINK, M.D., ROBERT L. KAHN, PHD. AND MAX POLLACK, PHD.

Reprinted from THE JOURNAL or NERVOUS
Volume 128, N0. 3, March
Printed in U.S.A.

AND MENTAL DIBEABE
1959

�JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Volume 128, No. 3, March 1959

Reprinted from THE

Printed in U.S.A.

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL
DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
TO CONVULSIVE THERAPY1
MAX FINK, MD.,2 ROBERT L. KAHN, PHD. AND MAX POLLACK, PHD.
INTRODUCTION

While convulsive therapy is generally
considered speciﬁc for the symptomatic re—
lief of depression and agitation, and for the
relief of such “illnesses” as manic-depressive
and involutional psychotic reactions, the
behavioral response to such therapy is
highly variable. In initial attempts at understanding this behavioral variability, differences in physiologic response were sought.
Neurophysiologic change was measured in
various ways (4). The quantitative measures of induced EEG delta activity (1) and
changes in language after amobarbital (3,
7) provided the best indices. Considerable
variability in these indices among patients
with equivalent numbers of treatment was
observed. We concluded that the development of an alteration in brain function, as
measured by a high degree of EEG delta activity (1) and positive amobarbital tests
(7) was a prerequisite to behavioral change
in convulsive therapy. It was apparent, however, that such changes, although necessary,
were not sufﬁcient for improvement (2).
Indeed, among patients with maximal neu—
rophysiologic change, all patterns of behavioral adaptation were manifest, and
ratings of improvement ranged from “re—
covered” to “unimproved” and “worse.”
Equating segments of the observed popu—
lation according to nosologic or sympto—
matic categories also failed to explain the
variability in behavioral response. While
among patients in the manic-depressive and
1Aided in part by Grants M-927 and MY-2092
National Institute of Mental Health, US. Public
Health Service. Read at the Section of Convulsive
Disorders and Brain Function, American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco, May, 1958.
EThe Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New
York.

involutional depressive groups a higher inci—
dence of hypomanic and euphoric modes of
adaptation were observed, and thus ratings
of “recovered” and “much improved” were
more frequent, there still were many subjects in these groups who manifested paranoid and somatization modes, and were
rated “unimproved.”
In the investigations of convulsive therapy, various tests of perceptual organization and indices of sociologic background
have been studied which reﬂect the individual differences in the subjects. Of these,
some measures correlated highly with the
behavioral response to convulsive therapy.
The psychological measures employed have
been Rorschach responses (11), “explicit
verbal denial” tendencies as measured in
structured interviews with family members
(12), and scores on the California F Scale
(8, 10). The sociologic variables have been
chronologic age, years of education and
place of birth. It is the purpose of this report to summarize the observations of the
relationship between these indices and the
variability of the behavioral response to
convulsive therapy as reﬂected in evalua—
tions of improvement.
METHODS

The population has been consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy in a voluntary, non-proﬁt, urban psychiatric hospital.
Patients were generally Jewish, of low and
middle socio-economic classes with a mean
educational level of 10.5 years. Ages ranged
from 16 to 67 with a mean of 41 years.
Diagnoses included schizophrenia, manicdepressive, psychoneurotic and involutional
depressive reactions. As segments of the
population were studied by various procedures at different times, the tables reﬂect
243

�244

FINK, KAHN AND POLLACK

the different numbers of subjects that were
included in each procedure.
All patients received electroconvulsive
therapy three times a week, using either
unidirectional or alternating current instruments. The various psychological tests were
administered Within the week prior to treat—
ment.
We have previously described the be—
havioral changes in convulsive therapy as
variations of ﬁve modes of adaptation (euphoric, hypomanic, somatization, paranoid
withdrawal and panic), and emphasized that
the evaluations of “improvement” in convulsive therapy are value judgments of the
induced behavioral changes (2). Patients
who manifest euphoric and hypomanic
adaptive modes are those generally rated
as “much improved” and “recovered” by
therapists and administrator, while those
who manifest paranoid-withdrawal, somatization or panic modes are generally regarded
as “unimproved” or “worse.” For this report, evaluations of the patient’s behavior
and ratings of improvement were made
either two to three weeks after termination
of treatment (Tables 1, 2, 3) or at the time
of discharge from the hospital (Table 4).
TABLE 1
Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical
Response in Convulsive Therapy
Much
Improved

N

Moderately
Improved
and
Unimproved

Movement

39 11

(28%) 28

(72%)

No Human Movement

48 28

(58%) 20

(42%)

Human
(M)

x2

= 676* p &lt;

Form Color (FC)
No Form Color

34 7
53 32

Both M and FC
Either M or F0
Neither M nor FC

24 4
25 10
38 25

(21%) 27 (79%)
(60%) 21 (40%)
x2 = 11.57* p &lt; .001
I

X2
*

.01

(17%) 20
(40%) 15
(66%) 13
= 14.83 p &lt;

(83%)
(60%)
(34%)

.001

With Yates’ correction for discontinuity

OBSERVATIONS
RORSCHACH TEST PATTERNS

The Rorschach tests were administered
in conventional fashion and scored according to established criteria (13) for speciﬁc
factors as number and type of movement,
color, form, shading and total number of
whole responses. For each of these factors,
signiﬁcant differences were observed be—
tween the group of patients rated as “much
improved” and the combined groups of those
patients evaluated as “moderately improved” and “unimproved.” Subjects with
human movement responses were evaluated
as “much improved” signiﬁcantly less often
than subjects without such responses. The
presence of form color responses was signiﬁcantly correlated with lack of improvement, and when this factor was combined
with human movement, the ratings were
signiﬁcantly poorer than when neither form
color nor human movement were reported
(Table 1). Similarly, patients rated “much
improved” gave fewer total responses, fewer
total movement responses and fewer content categories; but the per cent whole,
popular and form responses were signiﬁ—
cantly greater than in the groups rated as
“unimproved” and “moderately improved”
(Table 2).
“DENIAL PERSONALITY” SCORE

In their study of denial of illness, Weinstein and Kahn (14, 16) described the characteristics of an “explicit verbal denial”
personality type.3 In an initial group of
convulsive therapy patients, the hypothesis
was tested that those patients who most
closely approximated this personality type
would be most likely to be rated as “much
improved.” “Denial personality” scores were
3“They were people with compulsive drives, a
great need for prestige and the esteem of others,
and a record of always having denied felt inadequacies. ...Life experiences had been valued not
for their intrinsic satisfactions but as a means of
maintaining prestige and “security.” (14).

�245

PERSONALITY ASPECTS OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY

established pretreatment in independent
structured family interviews. Fifteen spe—
ciﬁc areas of behavior were assessed and
scores of 0, 1, and 2 were assigned for each
of these areas according to whether the
subject least, moderately or most approximated the characteristics of the “explicit
verbal denial” personality type. In interviews with relatives of 47 patients, scores
ranged from zero to twenty-ﬁve, with a
median of eleven. Subjects with scores above
eleven were classed into a high denial group,
while those with scores below, into a low
denial group.
Patients with high denial personality
scores were most likely to be rated as “much
improved,” with only one patient rated as
“unimproved.” Of patients with low denial
scores, clinical ratings occurred on a chance
basis in each evaluation category (Table
3). The difference in the denial scores be—
tween the much and moderately improved
patients, when compared to the unimproved
patients, is statistically signiﬁcant at the
one per cent level (12).
In a further elaboration of these personality types, studies of the total in—patient
population were undertaken. Certain sociologic and psychological factors were studied
in all patients in residence on March 7, 1957.
These included the California F Scale, age,
years of education and place of birth (8).

TABLE 2
Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical
Response in Convulsive Therapy
Dif—

N Mean S. D. ference

Number of Responses
Much Improved
3813.00 6.7
Moderate, Unimproved 48 19.5 12.8

52 ' 7*...

6

Per Cent Whole Responses
38 37.6 21.013
Much Improved
' 23 ' 0*...
Moderate,Unimproved 4824.4 18.2
Per Cent Popular Responses
Much Improved

Moderate,Unimproved
Number Movement
sponses
Much Improved

38 37.7 21.6 11 1 2 8**
'
'
48 26.6 14.3

Re-

Moderate,Unimproved

38 2.3
48 4.9

Number Content Categories
38 3.8
Much Improved

Moderate, Unimproved

Per Cent Form Responses
Much Improved
Moderate,Unimproved

4.9

48

2.7
5

1

2.2
2.3

2 ' 62 ' 7,“.

1

'

12 ' 1*

38 71.8 19.0
9 ' 92 ' 2*
48 61.9 21.4

Signiﬁcant at .01 level
Signiﬁcant at .05 level

**
*

TABLE 3
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Response in Electroshock
Mod-

N

CALIFORNIA F SCALE

The California F Scale consists of a series
of extreme or stereotyped statements con—
cerning social and personal attitudes. The
subject reads each statement and then reports the extent of his agreement or disagreement. Originally presented as a guide
to a subject’s capacity for ethnocentrism
and authoritarianism, the method has recently been explored as a measure of stereotypy and rigidity in communication (8, 10).
The test was presented to all patients prior
to treatment and scored on a scale of ten to
seventy. The ﬁgures represent maximal dis-

t

Personality Score
High Denial—(11—25)
Low Denial—(040)

24
23

NEE] erately ImImproved proved proved

14
7

9
9

l-|

7

agreement (low score) and maximal agree—
ment (high score) with the statements.
There was a signiﬁcant relationship (p &lt;
.05) between the pretreatment test scores
and evaluations of the clinical response to
convulsive therapy (Table 4). For patients
rated as “recovered,” the mean F score was
53.1, while for those rated as “unimproved”

�246

FINK, KAHN AND POLLACK

TABLE 4
Relation of Social Factors to Discharge
Ratings in Convulsive Therapy
N

Recovered
Much Improved
Improved and
proved

Unim—

8
26
23

$3

“*3

a
‘3

&gt;§ E5

2

2

2

a.

&amp;°

53.151.6 9.4 50
41.843.810.6 35
39.732.312.3 17

the score was 39.7, reﬂecting greater degrees
of agreement with the stereotyped statements of the test for the “recovered” group.
SOCIOLOGIC FACTORS

When analyses were made of the relation
between improvement ratings in convulsive
therapy and age, years of education and
place of birth, signiﬁcant relationships were
observed for each of these variables. The
“recovered” patients were signiﬁcantly older
(p &lt; .001) and had signiﬁcantly fewer years
of schooling (p &lt; .05) than the “unimproved” group. While a larger percentage
of the “recovered” patients than the “unimproved” patients was foreign-born (50
per cent vs. 17 per cent), the differences were
not signiﬁcant. In each category, the “much
improved” subjects fell in between (Table
4).
DISCUSSION

We have noted that measures of perceptual organization, personality traits and
sociologic data are related to the degree of
improvement shown by subjects with cone
vulsive therapy. These observations pr0v
vide an understanding of the individual
variability in the behavioral response to
convulsive therapy under conditions of ap~
parently equivalent degrees of altered brain
function.
In their studies of patients with brain
disease, Weinstein and Kahn described be—
havioral patterns as ludic behavior (15),
increased smiling and laughter, denial of
illness, minimization and displacement of

symptoms, and altered sexual behavior
achieving prominence in the milieu of a1—
tered brain function. They suggested that
the manifestation of these behavioral patterns also provided the basis for the evaluation of improvement in convulsive therapy
(16). In these studies of patients in con—
vulsive therapy the same patterns of laughing and smiling, denial, displacement, minimization and altered sexual activity do
indeed occur in the milieu of the induced
altered orientation and discrimination (2).
It is the patients demonstrating these altered behavior patterns who are rated as
“recovered” or “much improved”; while
those patients failing to show these patterns or doing so transiently are evaluated
as “unimproved” or “improved.”
Recent studies of changes in language
with convulsive therapy have further ampliﬁed an understanding of these behavioral
responses. Alteration in syntactic aspects of
language has been related to clinical ratings
(9). Patients evaluated as “recovered” and
“much improved” demonstrated signiﬁcantly greater use of the past or future tense
and the third person mode with qualiﬁca—
tion, evasion, denial, displacement, clichés,
and cryptic and stereotyped expressions
during treatment than did “unimproved”
patients. More recently, Jaffe et al. (6) reported that formal speech patterns also were
characteristically altered. In dyadic interactive speech analyses (5), increased repetitiveness and stereotypy were associated
with syntactic language changes during convulsive therapy.
In the studies reported here, aspects of
personality organization have been deﬁned
which are related to the type of behavioral
response incident to convulsive therapy.
The Rorschach patterns of the more favorably rated group are generally associated
with greater degrees of conventionality and
stereotypy, and little introspectiveness, imagination, empathy and creativity. Similarly, the higher F scores of the more favorably rated group is consistent with greater

�PERSONALITY ASPECTS OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY

degrees of ethnocentrism, authoritarianism,
rigidity and conventionality. In present day
urban culture older patients generally have
less formal education and a greater number
are foreign born than younger patients.
These sociologic factors are also associated
with greater adherence to conformist ideologies and ethnocentric identiﬁcation. We
may conclude that those patients who ap—
proximate the “explicit verbal denial” personality type, and who are non—empathic,
non-introspective, stereotyped, rigid and
conventional are most likely to manifest
the euphoric and hypomanic modes of behavior under the conditions of altered brain
function induced by repeated convulsions.
Such patients also rely primarily on nonverbal patterns of communication, and with
treatment evince increasing use of the lan—
guage patterns of repetitiveness, denial, displacement and third person. These changes
in language and behavior are the cues to
which psychiatrists and administrators respond in their evaluations, and thus provide
the basis for the clinical ratings of “re—
covered” and “much improved” (9).
In contrast, those subjects who are em—
pathic and introspective, who are not rigid,
conventional or stereotyped, and who rely
primarily on verbal patterns of communica—
tion are less likely to manifest the ludic
behavioral modes of euphoria and hypomania. With the induced alteration in brain
function they manifest increased somatiza—
tion, withdrawal, projection, anxiety, panic
and intellectualization. Their speech is pre—
dominantly in the present tense and in the
ﬁrst person mode without displacement,
denial or clichés. Clinically, such patients
are rated as “unimproved” or “worse.”
Thus, while altered brain function is essential for a behavioral change in convulsive
therapy, individual differences in personality organization provide the basis for the
variability in the types of behavioral
changes and in the clinical ratings of improvement. In another report (12) it was
suggested that the personality attributes

247

which provide the background for improve—
ment with convulsive therapy also provide
the basis for the depressive adaptation ini—
tially. It was noted that numerous authors
had described a characteristic pre-depressive personality type, with a prominence of
the features of perfectionism, rigidity, con—
scientiousness, and stereotypy. The social
factors, Rorschach and F scale patterns described here also support such a suggestion.
Ludic patterns of depression and mania are
more prominent in older, less educated sub—
jects. The conventionality, rigidity and
stereotypy associated with the ﬁndings on
the F scale and the Rorschach test are also
prominent in depressive illnesses. It is probable that the depressive psychotic reaction
and the euphoric-hypomanic behavioral re—
sponse in convulsive therapy may be as—
pects under different neurophysiologic con—
ditions of an adaptive pattern in subjects
with a personality organization marked by
stereotypy, rigidity, conventionality and
poor capacity for introspection and em-

pathy.

CONCLUSION

In studies of convulsive therapy, differences in personality organization and sociologic aspects of history have been related to
differences in behavioral response. Persons
who are stereotyped, rigid, non-empathic
and non-introspective, as deﬁned by explicit
criteria in Rorschach, F Scale and structured

family interviews, and who are less edu—
cated, older and foreign born are more likely
to manifest behavioral modes of euphoria
and hypomania and to be evaluated as “recovered” and “much improved.” Patients
who are introspective, empathic, non-stereotyped, native born, better educated and
young are more likely to manifest somatiza—
tion, paranoid—withdrawal and panic modes
of behavior with convulsive therapy, and to
be rated as “unimproved” or “worse.”
While an induced alteration in brain func—
tion is necessary for behavioral change in
the convulsive therapy process, personality

�248

FINK, KAHN AND POLLACK

organization and sociologic factors are de—
terminants of the type of behavioral change,
and of the clinical ratings of degree of improvement.
1.

REFERENCES
FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Relation of EEG
delta activity to behavioral response in
electroshock: quantitative serial studies.
A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat, 78: 516—

525, 1957.
2. FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Behavioral patterns
of induced states of altered brain function.

Presented at the NY. Divisional Meeting
A.P.A., Nov. 1957.
3. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND GREEN, M. A. Experimental studies of the electroshock proc—
ess. Dis. Nerv. System, 19: 113—118, 1958.
4. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND KORIN, H. Relation
of tests of altered brain function to behavioral change following induced convulsions.
In Proceedings I nternat. Congress N eurologic
Sciences, Brussels, 1958 (In press).
5. JAFFE, J. Language of the dyad. Psychiatry,

21:

249—258,1958.
6. JAFFE, J., KAHN, R. L.

7.

AND

.

216—228, 1957.

.

KAHN, R. L.

AND

FINK, M. Changes in lan-

guage during electroshock therapy. In Psychopathology of Communication, Hoch, P.
and Zubin, J., eds. Grune &amp; Stratton, New
York, 1958.
10. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. The relation of F
score to behavioral and physiologic response
with altered brain function. Presented at
Eastern Psychological Assoc, Phila., April,
1958.
11. KAHN, R. L.

12.
13.
14.

FINK, M. Com-

munication patterns with altered brain function. Presented at Eastern Psychological Assoc., Phila., April, 1958.
KAHN, R. L., FINK, M. AND WEINSTEIN, E. A.
Relation of amobarbital test to clinical im—

provement in electroshock. A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat, 76: 23—29, 1956.
KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M. Social factors in selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. J. Hillside Hosp., 6:

15.
16.

M. Prognostic application of psychological techniques in convulsive therapy. Dis. Nerv. System (In
press).
KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Personality factors
in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. Conf. Neurol. (In press).
KLOPFER, B. AND KELLEY, D. The Rorschach
Technique. World Book Co., New York, 1942.
WEINSTEIN, E. A. AND KAHN, R. L. Personality
factors in denial of illness. A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 69: 355—367, 1953.
WEINSTEIN, E. A. AND KAHN, R. L. Ludic behavior in patients with brain disease. J.
Hillside Hosp., 3: 98—106, 1954.
WEINSTEIN, E. A. AND KAHN, R. L. Denial of
Illness. C. C. Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill., 1955.
AND POLLACK,

��m.v..ww..

_._’—_w

L.

����unma‘mww
”WNW.
mwmmmmmmem

M'Wt

Wmemwmmg
mmmmmm a
.‘

Wmimﬁmxmtmmwwu

mummmammmmhum
MWWFW(%M}§

mwmmm
mwmmatmmmmum. mum

umwamm‘

‘

“at“

-

��wmmmwummumtmm
Wm»m:mwwm,m,rm
WWWMrotmm. mmdmu
ﬂuMWu’MWWWaWWM
«in»
'

m

W

“W“
mwmmmmmvmmm
mm

w

«-

and

“mmuwmawmmmuWa-m

WMWMMmemuImeW
(ma). mm,mummww”tw
mmmwwcmm.

mm

‘

��ms

s:

3

{8

a
5 M

3.5::

flat?

8.2.

h!

Mam

11.:

M

m“
m

W”

���������mmmuwmmmmn
Maw
Wmaim. nan-mm W; 1»ng

�mmummnm.mmmg

"

'MWMWWMMWM“

mmwwg WMmW
mmmmrmmwmmm,

wwwmammwwmm
~

gunman-mm

mmmmmmummmmm
Mn m Wruﬁ:
and

a!“

W.Mhumume*

~

'

MWWmqumww
WW;MMWWW£WM""
"'

"

��W WW

9*

my W M m. ﬁgt

”9‘

W; JurMEWW.
at rm MW 3”:
m MM m. an m
Wﬁﬁc nmmmmm mm

‘

in;

.g

'

'

W: m” mM: wwmmma
‘

"

:

Mammals,

�rtrthiias££»tariihlti an; litfﬁgh’yiglitig ﬁtﬁﬁﬂssirity
in

III

ﬁaavuisirn-rkarayy
fink £.a., sabnri L. xxx; ?h*ﬁ., at: Ftllaek $3.9a;
Eria 71.? ﬁts. uni ﬁaargt Iriiihtmcr rﬁmﬁ.

Etaai£t$£ﬁw wit'uw

2,

igr-mautxitivc thnragy'aurt siuiisé

hy'a rariuty'ai pixahaltgiz usattras tataru tsiaiasat, mm; by‘
citairuianiphalggrtna priir in :35 at stat}: sntarvilt irrin:
trﬁitnﬁiﬁa litawittan: in train fixttiau, ii ritiagtnd h: ahanaaa
1i‘£!§Qn¢§Q3, Iﬂilltﬁﬁﬁiw ytiﬁuxg iaﬁ I3323iidt-at
it; gzaatatu

sir: ﬂittinﬁé'iﬁ #111333: t. thata tartnilini In:
ta-tuhuvttrni ¢hangn-uu% a sxtaiaul rating
at tnyrnvanaat a:

:neuyhnzucrin

titsinaﬁzaa Qf'ﬁrititaat.

against mattuMﬁ

(mg;

iltmic if inﬁnatd ﬁliﬁiV_'vff_i£
triatutut.rurin§3¢tt
{I}
‘3}

(t;

{é‘

him an
m cm
it: tailasﬁa;

akinga~auﬁ

Edttgtittul liﬂii
.“raahnth étttwniaant a: sawisaat
aiaﬁtr'af rnsgguauu

ﬁnipdaca ftgirCi
£293: tiﬂtx

ﬁiit

prum

£31

unlar, and

1
rdhtﬁosﬂtip liti'iﬁitﬁﬁd hciniia
fana%iun is nnﬁsgrud hr t§$=¢iiri§'ﬁf agitatittrstinu
as'htatuSixtifiiint
is tht 5:3 ngd ixtntunnt 1néﬁﬂﬁi htharSQaii «hauggﬁ aativit:
£btai~tltiQiﬁ
pctttrnc g: bchsvﬂtr.r¢$né n: tltni¢¢3 ingrartxtat vyrt «tutiagatt
at: as}; uyca hash ingrts «cita-asxitiﬁy ﬁat ‘13» ﬁgs: prttrtttrwat

ysﬁﬁczas, snaialagia atatua
:ggzyalagie
3.,
.-

utiuttt in anuwulstrt

iii caviruauinttl

axycetta

tasrtwwa htknvitria ﬁhﬁﬁgt it
ya rasraghi£ akga¢§.til:
titan; of tﬁyrﬂfiﬁtut it
ndagtsnnalzy anytudnat xyau a sanrttiXItiin~¢£ incinwyuxtiaiazia
{tetart. inurtivgr, aaaragixtiszatic ﬁnsgunttriir/{rntt a: daggni
changa} te.iaisa££V¢§nr%1:iuus nag':;:¢ ht signxxiaaatxx rillﬁiﬁ
it
to praﬁrin$uwat wazwhniycis tnriuklta;
ﬁﬁﬁﬁ

‘. -.}3

&amp;

strain: a: tk: rglatiau ni Iicatasgriabis ﬁhﬂﬁlt tn
tokuvitrti thilﬁi in £¥I¥I1§i¥i tiarapy'hata
giglana.a¢itead£¢tnay
Tﬁlit vuritziutx in gs$athn nay bﬁ-ﬁuﬂ ﬁ¢~dittarinass
rtatits..
in thc ﬁﬁﬂiltility ﬁhirtﬁttriiiici of tin pnpszntisna a$a§$¢i. stag:
n.¢1a~p¢y¢hn1ag£¢ yuittrnn tam: raissaﬁ I¢%
in tha $1§§ nut
auruiinn it in$ugté htknrtnwai ahanga. hut tacal:
it. taunt: a: alaetrtw
cruphta ghaagn as will.
thy yxatuut raanlts igﬁictza ihct univxriata asalytts 5: ngnrew
Iiiﬂiﬂﬂi§~inﬁ.§iiﬂiiﬁfli miiatianiﬁﬁpt it an liﬂiﬁf tinguctc it
pﬁzwh£1$rr, txé it» nyyliatiiin ir‘xithnﬁ:
its yrlhxaut at txyttiillfﬁl
‘xgugitistrittaugunlytis in rttnxnttﬁtd.
$raa'$hi ﬁ¢g¢rinknt a: Emyirin¢a£81 vtyzhjuiry, aillxiﬁc lbxpiﬁti,
3’2“ Q‘k‘g 11:39, tits:
“3 in,“ “a: £3.
Punt

_

�Psychologic Variables and Neurophysiologic Reaponsivity

In Convulsive Therapy
Max

Fink 14.13., Robert L. Kahn Ph. 13.,

PollacK Ph.D.,

Max

Eric Karp B.A. and George Krauthamer Ph.D.

/ MiConsecutive

referrals for convulsive therapy

of psychologic

were studied by a

measures prior to treatment, and by

variety;

electro-

encephalogram prior to and at weekly intervals during treatment. Alterations

in brain function, as reflected

Wm
and amplitude were examined

EEG

frequency, modulation, pattern

variables’W

in relation to these

and

improvement on

in

by changes

to behavioral change and a clinical gating of

teminatMtreafmren‘t

.

Significant relationships ”if”; were observed

induced

change and the following pre-treatment variables:

EEG

(W
m
W

(a) Educational level

&gt;

‘

between the degree of

-”M(b)

.

i5- Rorschach criteria
'

(c)

‘

(d)

.

0}

.

Mnemr, 8.4,, M Ma...

{@3/apmaw
{magmg /,~:.,W2M7/5,,+.

-

«1'

Jul

deft“ WW

4%

significant relationship ia-legiesee existed between alteration of brain
function and treatmet induced behavioral change.
degree
Metfffrﬁfiﬁfrtmm_.._.a,._m.,...,hz:€.5...»
7‘»
«9 a'
“W”
'
delta a
~- . A clinical
rating of improve“be!”
0
,mx fwﬂ’
A

h

#5.»

da
»

-

QC

.

(Hréy
50’4”“? “ﬂaw
mentm‘honever, was contingent” upon high degree delta
activity4ude pretreatment

psychologic

pattem‘W) , sociologic status and environmental

'-

“)2,

«Km

,

expectationxr.

Conclusions: ﬁ’ehavioral change was related to electrographic
change. while—a—

rating of "improved"
socio—psychologic

0b

Iivz'taa-additionally dependent upon a

factors.

Mor-eover, neurophysiologic

(rate ﬁgme of change) to induced convulsions
\
pretreatment psychologic variables.
,1'

,

'

constillation
responsivity

of

46“
significantly related to

’4'

�l'

“

s

—2-

W

.. Past studies of the relation of electrographic change to behavioral change
M
have yielded con radictony results. These variations in outcome may be due to

differences in the personality characteristics of the populatioz%tudied since
L...
patternsm
related not only to the type and duration of
socio-pscyhologic
induced behavioral change but to the degree of electrographic change as well.
)
,

present results underline the fact that a univariate analysis of
neurophysiologic and. behavioral relationships is no lonser adeouate to the
problems of experimental psychiatry, and the application
methods of
The

multivariate analysis is

From

/

recommended.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital

Glen Uaks,
_

of”

L.I.,

3/31/60
1,12
‘W'o

Am.

N.Y.

EEG

�Peychologic Verieblee end Heurephyeielogic neeponeivity
In Convaleive Therepy
H.D., Robert L. Kehn Pb. B., Hex Polleek Ph. 9.,
Eric Kerp 8.1. end Gear‘s Kreuthemer Ph. D.

Hex Fink

caneecutive reterrele for convulsive therepy were etudied
by e

veriety of psycholcgic neeeuree prier to treetnent, end

by

electreeneephelogrene priortc end et weekly intervals during treat»

sent. Alterations in brein funetian, ee reflected
EEG

by changes

in

frequency, modulation, pattern and emplitude were exemined in

relation ta these verieblee,
retinx of impraveuent

an

and

to behavioral chense and e elinieel

termination at treatment.

aignificent relationship: (ch12)
degree otinduced

EEG

change end the

were cheerved between the

tellewin; pro-treatment verieblee:

/

(e) Educetianel level

(b) Borechack criterie at Movenent, cola: end number at
reepanaee
Embedded
figures tent
5c)
d) Alphe index
A

eignificent reletionnhip also existed between ulteretien

of brain functien and treatment induceé behavioral change.

a: behavioral chenge

clinicel retina

wee

The

releted to the degree at doth activity.

degree
A

of improvement an the ether hand, wee contingent net

only upan high degree delta activity but 1139 upen pretreatment

�-2psycholozic puttcrna, acciolugic atatuu and :nvironmontal czpoetu»

tians.
In convulsiva thornpy, bchuvieral china. 1:

concluaianl:

rolntnd tn oloctrojruphic ahango.

ally doplndont

upon n

A

rgtin; at

"iaprovod" is udditienu

conttullutien of nocia-puychalogic fucters.

Haruovor, nourophyniologie

rolponnivity (rate or dogrco or chug.)

to induced convulntian any :13» be ainnitiauntly rulgtod to prttrtat~
meat 0! p'ycholugic

itriabloa.

Putt studio: at tn. rclution or uloctroxrnphic chums. to
bchnvieral chancc 1n aonvnlaivo thar¢py hgvo yieldod contradietery

results.

Thoad

variations in outeon.

may be due

to dirtcraneca in

the per-antlity ehnrtgtoristtel at the papulntinns atadiad sine.
aocio~puychelogic pattorno may be relatud act only ta

th.

type tad

durntion of induced behavioral chang¢,but to the dagrue a! cloetron
graphic chance as well.
The

proutnt ralultu undarlino tho

itct that

a

univtriato unllyais

or nouraphyaiologic and bah;vioru1 rolatianahipa is no lengur aduqutto

to the prablonl a! prorinonttl psychiatry, und the npplication or
methods or
From

rocommandad.

the Dopnrtuqnt of Exporinontnl Psychiatry, Hillaido Hospital

Glon Oaks,

1v:

nultivaridn analysis in

h/l/éc

3.1.
L.I.,
Am. 320

�‘

,é?"

/'

/

(o
1/,

"y

.4

Psychologic Variables and Neurophysiologic Responsivity
In Convulsive Therapy
Max

Fink M.D., Robert L. Kahn Ph. D.,

Max

Pollack Ph. D.,

Eric Karp B.A. and George Krauthamer Ph.

D.

Consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy were studied

ﬁg: a.

variety of psychologic measures préer—te treatment,

by a

and by

electroencephalograms priogﬂb and at weekly intervals during treatment.

Alterations in brain function, as reflected
91/

~EEG

“ﬁg; r5313r

«35? a».

in

affﬂzf‘ﬂgﬁ" Qi’e‘u

frequency, modulation, pattern and amplitudeﬂwere examined in

relation to these variables,
rating

of improvement on

and to

behavioral change and

degree ofinduced
a
ébg:

m

Educationa

Rorschacﬁ

e

\.of

reaponses
Embedded figures test
Alpha index

0

"d
A

and the

25%

a

clinical

termination of treatment.

Significant relationships (chizi
xi,
3F
5.3,“,change

of

2‘33;

by changes

were observed between the

following

pre— treatment

variables:

A,

ovement,A color, and number of

significant relationship also existed between alteration

brain function Aand treatment induced behavioral change

imbald£££§§WW,

WW C56Mamet,
(Wheg
“Mbehaxlnnalxchangemuas.relaxed.tewthedegreeofwdglﬁ33%;:gﬁrw
£17MM4/sgéf

“3...:

W
clanaeelwrati“g“cﬁmimprgyementan“:

an s:

{:Lﬂﬂu

49;

‘odZEfMM,4

9%

only upon high degree

3%”;ng

Clzbwi ,1? W4
'Mcthermnaﬁdwwwas
My»:

delta activity but also

upon

y

A

'x

contingent not

pretreatment

�\

-2psychologic patterns, sociologic status and environmental expectae

tions.
Conclusions:

In convulsive therapy, behavioral change is
i

related to electrographic change.
ally dependent

upon a

A

'
is addition—
rating of aou:;;:::ew3‘

constgllation of socio—psychologic factors.

Moreover, neurophysiologic

responsivity (rate or degree of chage)

to induced convul€2§0n§may also be significantly related to pretreat—
ment

,/

psychologic variables.
Past studies of the relation of electrographic change to

behavioral change in convulsive therapy have yielded contradictory

results. 'These variations in

outcome may be due to

differences in

the personality characteristics of the populations studied)since
socio—psychologic

Kﬂwaaah

patterns

meynbe

related not only to the type

and

duration of induced behavioral change,but to the degree of electro—
graphic change as well.
dwadﬁfffﬂ

present results mad-niIl-Iib-iﬂiit thatdﬂ‘univariate analysis
or
ngﬁsﬂb
4o
of neurophysiologic and behavioral relationships gﬁkno longerﬁadequate
The

\

tojthe problems of experimental psychiatry,
’

and the

.

application of

1

methods of multivarian analysis is recommended.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Glen Oaks, L. I.
1v: h/1/60 Am.

N. Y.

EEG

Hillside HOSpital

-

�01:?
////’

m

'

Individual Differences in Neurophysiologic Responsivity
to Convulsive Therapy

Previous studies indicated that an alteration in brain

function was requisite to/tkéfbehavioral change and ratings of
improvement in convulsive therapy.
has been

The

type of behavioral change

related to various perceptual,psychologic,

and

social

aspects of the individual's history and behavior.The present
study demonstrates significant relationships between the degree
of

037'

-convulsive neurophysiolegic change

and amobarbital

test

(EEG

slow wave

activity

response) and pro-treatment perceptual{MW‘

4,

,

'

personality functioning (educational level, Rorschach, figure5

\

.

{A

1‘

1

groun
While

Mylo “W“; ’/
f
relationshipeztsﬁuu'n neurophysiolegic

“a. 3mm

meeewneﬁ

a-dL

J3
”(a[7w //
,3

5‘

1%?!”

”Z

personality measures have generally not been-establisheéi these
observations indiate that the rate and degree of change] in
neurophysiologic

.m
(mm/Me

may

indeed be related to personality

cognitive

Illﬂlllﬂr(perceptualenillI-Ig style).

AM; ,3.
ﬁzz/)4!

%x Fly

if! ﬂ/s’éx. 6mg“!

KC

A9- 3.

(buff ﬂags/.4

,4”?
’7 g/Qt MM 6“

My

1501 6:1

’-

/

1L ,‘ I/I/ff

SM 3191” 739/5

I

Wm?

/ £421 /9’
-

er,

4.! 4452;;

J).

/Vé(fm'«£ﬁ AV/f’S-Qi?

�Iu¢$viéun1 attrarnuaés in laurgzhywtaivgtc acupuaatvitr
w. Eﬂwftliﬁfi trip:
Sadiugtaa thlt an ultawutiaa in brain
to-hohavﬁawtl altar: «at rﬁtlﬁli a:
1x 'fﬁ'ﬁi
ﬁﬂﬁVQIﬂ$ti tharnrr. ran try. it hnhuvioral
atgnga in: ﬁtlh vclntid ‘Q,Vﬁiﬁtﬂ£ paranptuul, payuhaxactc,
and.a¢uiul maptatn #1
taaivtdial': htttﬁ 3nd hakartor.
prtuwut atudy «cannatmutua niauitianai t! ﬁicaahtpa
htiuuou tau dﬂlvtu ut’pwctucauvuluavu usurnphywitisxin
thlﬁtt (35$ glam invﬂ tnttvaty Ina unuhmrbttal gait rntycnu¢3
Ind ﬁrmwtﬁuniuunt-§ortwptau1~wur*6mtlitr tunatttuﬁnc (a:

traritus atndxnu
at: 1nragtisitn

txantayn
‘

it:

it.

»

aduuutiaut&amp;,10111,‘luriuhnah puttarm, taguVwaraunA
ﬁtﬂ‘rtﬂiﬁi$1ﬁﬁ)t
wail: studxgn u: Ringlt ampuuta or nttrtvhrmzcanggu
IS‘ rtrtunllt hﬂﬁﬂ‘rﬂi but. annurallr Raﬁ tntnbitshnd
tisuttinaut to .ttiuﬁhtpa, than: Qiuutvutlaaa tnﬂieuﬁﬁ that
$hn vain nnd iuarug ﬁt ah:act an xuurtpaauitlngis ratptuaﬁ
uzritgdand ht rtInSaa ta yﬁﬁiﬂnﬂltiw§(ptt‘i’ﬁtﬂlﬁﬁlcttﬁtwﬁ
_

7

.

: y n\.

‘I‘ﬁﬂii!

inn

fiat, ”.36.

rrwn

tn: btpartnuut u:

.111

11/59

ﬁlms Wilt, ﬂute:

5“.

1.1;

‘R4 nﬁbﬁft

Ly

i333, ?h§na

inp§r$mmnta1 Payuhxatry,

3%.}; ’Ufﬂht

tillntén

ﬂuupiﬁnl.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2674">
                <text>Psychological factors affecting individual differences in behavioral response to convulsive therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1959 Mar;128(3):243-8.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2675">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2676">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-36-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2677">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2678">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2679">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2680">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2681">
                <text>3 items. 1: Reprint from THE JOURNAL or NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Volume 128, N0. 3, March 1959. 2: [preprint]. 3: 2 drafts and one abstract.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2682">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2683">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74470">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81031">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87592">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94153">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6742" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6550">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/371617534179d54e66d61621a46020c8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6e55d00563bbed3481f9a9906c445b08</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107155">
                    <text>therapy,

we

hue

ahead-red

at

individul

wide

response. Subjects duomtrete sue

to

equivalent number: or induced

veriebﬂjkgy 1n

digress of

minim.

EEG

the

EEG

delta ee’dvity

In the observations

observed
the
to
teeters
of
to be reported, the reletien webologic

variability is amend.

mam Ed

Hethod:

referred
patients
consecutive
heapi’oelized
malty-dive

slammed.“

M

with
wire
tested
Subjects
studied.
therapy were
‘
im’TA‘MVvV «Ov1

M

W

the

tor

Bottleneck end ~

~

within a

week

prior to treatment. ﬂeetreemphllo—

wmdompriortotreemnt,endetweek1yintemledunng
treatment.

The

records were

wt!

for the degree of induced

deeoribed&lt;
previously
indieee
£5}
activity using quentitetive
Bad; petienh wee

or

imml’bbq

Medea-eff.

5?

Gem flaw.

Reﬂexeither
using
week,
times
a
three
trotted

instruments.

I «M—-W-nuzwm: .4-

HH'

an.

-\'.

[UK/W
Clo.)

f‘ru’f

a?)

�heults:
1. Subjects with
1!

and

FC

human

moment (H), fem-color

Rorschach responses showed

induced delta

(PC)

signiﬁcantly lesser

activity than subjects

who had no such

or bath

amounts of

responses.

2. Subjects with fewer Rorschach responses (R) and fewer

total moment (Home) teaponses
of delta activity.

m
3.

.

The

..

higher the

malted

simificantly greater degmee

Wmmt

«L
test, the greater the

«rot-beers

on the

degree of induced delta activity.

gnawing:

These studies describe a consistent

tram

perceptual responses and

041v

w

relationship between

pre—

obeemd degree of phtsiologic

alteration following repeated induced cerebral trams.

While

factors

of current, skull resistance, inherent responsivity of brain, 239.
may

affect the manifest physiologic alteration,

that the subject's usual

test eeores) affect the
the

EEG

nodes of adaptation

(reflected in his pemptnal

physiologic response to

cannot be viewed as

it is also probable
tram.

In this context,

in isolated physiologic index but is seen

�Conclusion:

Individual differences in the ma activity are related to
have
Insurer
as
latter
the”
differences in perceptual petteme.

been shown to

reflect pereomlity differencee,

we would

the individual'e node of adaptation ('persomliW')

ﬂ“

Wﬁest chengef mtg; Physiologic

‘76
5359::

(me).

suggest thet

Wed—be

We

EFFE‘ ’1
\

would conclude

that those aspects of experience and edaptetion that effect perceptual
trauma.
me
the
to
at
affect
also
responsivity
tests

�It't'f7

7-..“.

Psychologic Factors in

EEG

Reactivity to Induced

Cerebral Dysfunction
In the course of an investigation of the role of alteration in

cerebral function in the changes in behavior induced by convulsive
therapy,

we

have observed a wide

individual variability in the

wide
denonstrate
degrees of
Subjects
response.

EEG

EEG

delta activity

to equivalent numbers of induced convu1310ns. In the observations
to

be

reported, the relation of pSychologic factors to the Observed

variability is assessed.
Subjects and Method:

Eightyafive consecutive hospitalized patients referred for
electroconvulsive therapy were studied. Subjects wire tested with

the Rorschach and the Gottschaldt embedded figure
Sinai Modification) within a

week

test (Battersby

—

prior to treatment. Electroencephaloat weekly intervals during

grams were done

prior to treatment,

treatment.

records were measured for the degree of induced delta

The

and

activity using quantitative indices previously described.
Each

patient

was

treated three times a

or Medcraft instruments.

week, using

either Reiter

�Results:

1. Subjects with
H

and

FC

human movement (M),

Rorschach responses showed

induced delta

form-color (F0) or both

significantly lesser

activity than subjects

who

amounts of

had no such responses.

2. Subjects with fewer Rorschach responses (R) and fewer

total

movement

(MWFM+m)

responses

Showed

significantly greater degrees

of delta activity.

3.

The

higher the nambeehefepre-treatment error.score on the

Gottschaldt test, the greater the degree of induced delta activity.
Discussion:
These studies describe a consistent

relationship between pre-

trauma perceptual responses and the observed degree of phisiologic

alteration folloWing repeated induced cerebral trauma.

While

of current, skull resistance, inherent responsivity of brain,
may

affect the manifest physiologic alteration,

that the subject's usual

modes

EEG

etc.

also probable

of adaptation (reflected in his perceptual

test scores) affect the physiologic
the

it is

factors

reSponse to trauma.

In this context,

cannot be viewed as an isolated physiologic index but

is seen

�activity
interpersonal
in
the
setting
by
influenced
as one that is
of the

test situation.

Conclusion:

to
related
are
EEezeactivity
the
Individual differences in
have
these
latter
as
Insofar
differences in perceptual patterns.
been shown

to reflect personality differences,

the individual's

mode

we would

of adaptation ("perSOnality") is related to

(EEG).
index
the
physiologic
in
manifest changes

that

those aspects of experience and adaptation

tests

suggest that

also affect responsivity of the

EEG

‘We

would conclude

that affect perceptual

to trauma.

���_..,,,

WWw-w

,,

.w ”m.“

"Wm“. ‘WW..‘M_

.

,,

’w m—w"'1"‘mr-' W'sw-m-v-ni

w

ar—

w..,._r..._.c

‘11ij

���EE

4»

mm
0%; MW

I'quw.

”a Mme-(W

“,de
'. d2. M + F6.
Eneu.

MwFt

0“

2°

(FMm)

2o

"

H.

M

‘37)

H’

(1.9.)

e

(:42)

6’40.

3

(I57.

($71

“-—

.1

E4“

O'C)

H

I§

«2.)

I2

Suﬁ.)

(4°74

lo

(“74)

‘—

oS'

-

Esr' 0-4

.154;

-3":

�W

M

l4.

2

,2,

mm“
'

”W
3‘!!-

4.6

”M
-?.I

2-!

c.

2. 3

.0!

non-I-

”*Fm-Ihs

(a:

EJfI-‘Il .(«y-h

�������//

7%2.4“;

M»!

é

4,4...»

r9

x‘W

W.

J

,

w
’

.,

{a

2:

%

__

A

J 7

l:‘&amp;%ﬁw

¥£a¢v

Mcwa

”

WM
iawzbz
%/

A

MLW:

/

WWW/rm!

:2,

J4

”Mug:

�3.053.567”

�/

4/WUO‘
7

#-

A

1'

011W

4f

r

-

Wu.m

7

,z,

[,5h

7:

-

r

r-

Mlv4"

‘

Aw!—

7

7

/

7
A «4.1.

/

,

IJ

7 ‘/
‘

7/

M

M”
by“
W '

Atatu— “

I;

AD
M144:

ﬂ,

" 4/

/

M:

��Aug/L4.

4»

ﬂ

AM

'

’4”)

.

4,5.

(-&lt;.o‘&gt;

�A9921

r'

”a“

A/

A/.

l‘

“L

‘L;

57””

13.15”
/

//. ("/1

.

'
.2. w»

‘5:

'_

‘

s

M.

�'rr'

�”921'.“

M

We.

’91

/

W
I

~

~23;
/

('2.

10.
U", 2,,

�APR

V ;

q

«1

/U

9

I...

’

,3

/

{-91

I

“A;

"4/4

'2

7

5"7‘ 3’

01.5,

2

‘y

‘65

�A98

1.1 ‘ f“

d|

-,

.

/‘~'

M, /

21 '5.

����“”92

w
2

M

�I

--I‘_,4‘L&lt;.Jnu

�||

’7.“

_H

I!

ll

.2./

2.33

&lt; or

�II

II

II

3;)!“ch "37)
II

II

II

II

ll
II
‘

II

‘I

ll

ll
.
1|

II

II

I!

H
ll

II

II

II

�II
.

0!! PC

3
‘ii

W

(

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

-

II
.

II

II

II

II

II

II

I
I

II
II

II

II

II

II

II

II

2.

���IS.

Mpc.

had”

II”

!!

9

7 A?)

(33')

I‘ll,
(0M :9»—

“n
“I
.

+
a?

(I
’

anr9

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

I
ll

/0

(«a

(a)

f‘Jo
2

II

r;

7

I)

m“

/.2

+

W1
7.3“,

—»

�93

71$

if

’4'“

I!‘
(L
..

_

4!!

f 26“,)"
‘2

ll

”L

‘

ll

’i:

__

,7Or)“

__(z,?)"
AI
mm"

H
+»a‘l
!!

j:

(p’ll

"
“41'

2.9/

{7/

[(2
/‘/£

"2.6

4,527

3.5/3

I???

45143

57’”

1/4 7

IL/Hs

6 7- 7’-

H‘ér

”62.24

49'0L/

3732,
(€42,

27771...

47.31’

(31.54"

64 7)

I36

7”

W
9

V”

°

2.24

//

I42.

s39

9 2.
-

_2_J_'#_.L3_3__

[cor

v“

4""

3

'

‘

4. //

.2./“’

6/70

"22'

‘

I

1

/°:,‘

-

‘

n_ﬂ

”J

�f};
7})“;
‘

..

44»

L

.’

6’
5"

z

’0

,

aw
,M

p9

,

PL;

o

/

ll

/!g

cll’
I

L

r

/S"'

-

’—

W
a u.
/

(367»)

‘l

I!

{ﬁlﬁ
(’9’;

L

(Cara)

/

{d

3

AL” 6?

./o

ﬂd

3°

/

C

/ “ 3

‘5'

4'

’L/

f

3

3

�Ill

W

W

#H-

m
If

I
.

’Il

4+»

u

‘H++-

,

IIII

+H~I~

~+H+-

[III

I

II

I

'

Ill

‘
‘

Nu.
m

m:

#H-

m

III

ink-

m

.

'

II

M
I

H

II

III

"1/

HH-

’I

_l

I
I

-1-H+

IN!

'

ﬂﬁ—
III
I

.

'

,I

clam

##4- u

#44-

"

1-m-

#+H-

l7 Fc.
l'7

\‘l
cm

DC.

m:

,,I

I

I

£4

III

,ll

+H+
I

an ac

'ﬂ-l-L I
'

’

up”

II

6172:

1+“

14H~

4”.
”II

'

II

m:

N!

rm.

II
4+"I

II

III

\'

'

u {I

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67414">
                <text>Psychological Factors in EEG Reactivity to Induced Cerebral Dysfunction (research), 1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67415">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67416">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-9-008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67417">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67418">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67419">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67420">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67421">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence: research with Robert L. Kahn</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67422">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67423">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80944">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87505">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94066">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100627">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="248" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="39">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/83ab48a2c2deaa99207d2c9a9f5a4a5d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5d4afa38e2ad19bfcb3084fe8746be25</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100665">
                    <text>111: 9/55

Egbert I» Kuhn, mm.

Hillside Raspiul, Glen
Despite ”posted attomptn,

wmlatiam

am, my Ia‘rk

between

aim

we activity

dwed by «hammock and subsequent. therapeutic outcome haw ham

Email, mrtain
ahock therapy

indum alterations in the sleetmncophalogm in all subjects.

mamas

voltage whim

wmmuml.

conclusions are wan-entree! Iran previous studies (1).- Electra:-

Three pattema we generally dowribad: ‘1) slowing of tha

2) the

in-

may

of

mam, symtria

awn {remiss}

51w wave activity, generality a: high

appear as burnt nativity) and 3) didnu‘him

cios in rate and amplitude.

mm in

din-act.

a

at beta rm;—

relatim human

12m

degree or

Mg”, and the number and imam a! mama. In my subjoéts
”mum paint at change is daaeribod, which can be maintained by further

those
a.

tmamnt, but which is

apparently not increased. Such indueod oloatroenccpmlu

ographic ehangaa are ﬂux-aims.

to the pretreatment

lswls is

number, frequency and
Another area

than

type

m ate at“ return at the: cem’bml

generally 1 to h weeks, dcpending

mhﬁmﬁhip between dagraa of manifest

and authors is

the

the ha}: of direct

wry loss and aonfusim and the

degree of electroencephalogmphie

abmmlity.

wry changes with few tmamants

and without.

Cases are demribed of

3mm

significant olaetmncaphalogmphic

mm without manifest clinical

ﬂange; and also a: never: changes in cerebral
emmnicn cf
inpaimsnt. In these reports,
ganic

dimam an

at tmtnen‘b.

a! agreement ”mg the

wry

patterns

it is?

stated that

Wim also correlates poorly with clinical results.

Hammad at tbs Eastern me Society, Bethesda, September 30,

1955»

mach

or»

��Whﬁla

and

EEG

these

twa

“mommy,

atuéies dananatrute a ralatianship betwaen clininal ralult
tho majority

91’

reports

fail to

do

m. It

3.8

mt 11h]:

that this diucrupanay is tha mosult a: diifarunt populatiana, but rather; tun
dimer-macs in methods of evaluating Swami, than him at Matias; and
diffexunaea in ontinnting change: in aarubrul runntian.

In in» ﬁgurae at stuﬁias a! alﬁarnd twain tunetian indueed by

at

elsatma—

in SW Yak, further data m the mkﬁiamhip
betaaun EEG ahangea aaa clinical atfoeta of aluetrenhoek wars colleetcd. ’lhs
genaral reaulta a: pruviaun investigatiena an the alteratienn in tho EEG with
shank

this 311137149 Hospital

taro anniixnnd, but 313a, a ﬁatinite rmlatianahip betwaan.ﬁﬂﬁ
effects and has clinical rasult was dnmnnstratod. Throa £661 are preaanted

alaetmeshock

today:
(1) the

m pattem mum electroshock

and

their

“hum to in-

pwavument.

(2) The internorrelatianl at airfarant quantitieatians

at ddlta acttvity.
(3) m relation of these abaemtiam to a theary at abet
whim.
:'vzvﬁhgggggga§§§y
Ihuntvmfaar aanaegutava patianta ratarrea for aleetre—
3

shock wart studied. Electruanczgu:.m¢~q

us

'

5

warn nan:

priar ta traatmant, at uaokly intsrvala ﬂaring traatment aha grist treatment.
In 8 ehanns1_ﬂhdcra£t instrunsnt, uaodlo eloatrudus, and bipolar racording
Hypervnntilaxdan was tha anly

was unad.

activatian tachnic utilixoé.

truatnant, raaarda ware takna tbs day'attor; ganamully

25

to

31 hunts

Datum:

after

traatmnnt.
Th3

Baiter
and

the

tmmnta wen administered by the staff paychia‘bris’m,

6 h?

electrnatinulator. Treatment scheéulas

namber

of treatmants variad tram

impruvemant, the

9

to 33.

warm

An

thrae

wing

a.

timma a'waek;

patianta shaved alinical

psychiatrist tended ta give raver treatments,

and warn widely

��m5:-

are mam of the diffieultiea in evaluating impmvmnm More might
have «momma in the estimates of change in those patients. In any
me, by
E‘o

wing this threefold clusifieatiem, the diffemooa between the
groups will be

distinct.

9E gag

EVALUATIOX

first and third

W!

A

total. of

160

meow: were obtained in these who

Following the suggestion of Strauss

(h), the
delta mm am determined for three: lead mmbinetiam (frontal—swam,
anterior temporal - vertex, and
lobe) for 180 ascends of Hoarding
for not load. The delta index :13
on the pemont time woupiod by
aerate.

”ﬂame
mm

of '3 ops- or slower. Tho avenge delta-dude: for the thm loads,.’md the
highest delta may: in my load were the 1mm: and in the final tabulation.
waves

Sinateneouoly, the record me

mad for the almost frequency 1am»

tifiea at least twioe in my load; the highs» voltage of

any

delta may and

the duration of the longest beret.
cm

the basis of those

were placed
160

mores

in

It rank

ﬁn indie”

order from the

of slow wave activity the meordu

ngt

abnormality to the

lawn.

The

were then divided into 3 groups! a Met. upper thins? high degree

abnormlﬂy, and

lmat

m

were .. 1m demo mbmmlitm
mum-*3: 1. 0m- nouns show a Mitim aomlntion human early out dugm
m; okxomlity and improvement. Thane relationships are demonstrated
11:

Slide 1.
By

utilising

sleetroehock, we
of

troutmt is

quantification of slow wave abnormality induced by
conclude that snob EEG abnormality induced in the first 3
theme

on “mental

response.
2..

clinical

mm minimums

We,

and than

m
clinical

Mama for the short tom favorable
mot bathroom

met

each of the

eeeh other?

indie”, first with the
‘

��WWW £611.3ng ehetrashock
mum

is

the mault of the

emﬁm in

the

mtiant

functim in winch new panama of adaptaum, part».
Mae me “when amnamu
1mm thaw 6! dental, my be.
of a

inﬂame! brain

as?

WM.

that: an. alts-rad milieu of eon-ohm}.

a puma-equate for
~

30W,

:1:

mmnt.

mum as measured by delta abnormality is

Ta @115

extent the

first

part.

at the Mates».-

”WWI:

many of quantitative
far the duaidatian at ”Wm 51‘ 27mm
mans studies paint. to the

Em

5mm:

�mm.

1..

than

39mm Lu Th0 Eleatmmeplulm in
Thempim, J. Raw. 8: Kent. 131»... Egg 95.107, 3.9512.

Jemph a. and Panelist,

maetrie

311w]:

3., Harland, W... Kaufman, and Pincus, 6.: Changes in the 81qumaﬁmlegm and in the ke-mtion at 17 {shoutemida [teeming Enam-

3.

shmk mommy af Agitated Mpmvam, Payuhoaom. Had... Qt

mm, mm: own in the me Mr Barbiturau Anesthesia mma by
Elw£mcanwlsin Mama’s and mm SiWicanee for the Timmy (31‘ E01

3..

m and Olin. Rummy“, g; 26l—280, 1951.

mum,

h. 8km“; Km: Clinical
-

at mm.

madmaophalogmphie Studies a eomhtim
Elwtmmawralegmphie and Anatomic Ganges in Gases with

m: 14260, 191th.
Hammin, Eel” and him, Rd": Mastic U“ a! Mbaﬁihl 3mm!
(“Mm Sodium“) in Ma Brain 31m”, Am. J. Wat" m: 12,
m,

6. Fink,

3.,

Am.

J. Psychnti,

'

1953.

m,Rental

Bead», ﬂu

H; and

a! Qrmie
7.

and

Dimse,

Org-mm Brain

5.

Wﬁ; 19%.

as n Diagnostia Sign

Baum, at 246—58, 1952‘

W

in now-y and
Mauser, 3.: 33mm a:
Impmmment in Wmhoak, cant. "euraloguu, 1‘? W6,

mm, m, Fink,
Lamina to

Byndram,

ﬁne Farm-Hand East

u. and

1956.
8...

www, EM”
mumps“

Its

my “~26,

Kuhn,

8.1. and MM, 1.: Paychoais During mew-9mm

Bushman he the Them? of
1952.

312302

Therapy,

Am. 3»

WM,

�������MW“: ﬁwzww/Z

WW!
::

Var/7

.

a;

/W‘
/
/

MMﬁw l-I’M)
/, VMW

5/

We W /
'

-

’

/

ri

'

L

444:1”
/~57:é'(/

*'

.

'

�/WW
WQMW
We. WDZM/JMD szd
4

”Ma/Z7444444944“
M—IWM W43,
g;
ﬁw/
444
W544.»
MM
ﬂWM
AM MW ZIMMWQ
L

SCAMUE‘D

%

”M W“
”774/

W'

AWQQ
”W47
ﬂaw/44¢;”jg Mix/«442

�ﬂ

,

V

MW/a/é/WWM
Mat/c9245.?

M/W7M7Wa.

MW/ZWa/d —%¢%7AQWW

2%
H

M AA/W/Wd4

Mama/21¢

#wdfm?/
WWWWX‘JP ﬂux/(‘5‘
WWW/LWMW/AW
W%WW&amp; ,MAW’ZmV/
%/laﬂ6¢r¢£Wﬂu~

WM 30%....

.

�@:

’OZQJWWM

%W
M,:/éw€

£W7WW
éwaf‘W

Jazz/WW //~JW’{)W
W
/ W,”
make—4441M

@ace
WMA,
W
mg
WWW—jfszd, éﬂfﬁé;e.

I

wmbéMW

ﬂW;
WWW
MW
@yagﬁa
/
mm

V
UZW‘ﬂm
W4
M
ﬂed/2W

"

�W cam/um aim W
,mmvwr‘MA/ﬂﬂ
M Ma ://Z~M~/Z~;/

.

.2.

‘

W
ﬁWZW/LM/AM

WYAMCMMWWM
WW

M562Qﬂﬁ7~fw
W/QWWMW
/¢éa¢d/W
@ngaiu/é
Mh/o/VW

/MM*/WwWéAﬂ.—A
74%. MW/%Wé&lt;~v
ﬂms
M—/k

MM
ﬂoWW/I
ﬁ/ch/M
ﬂWM,W/%9%Wﬂ-

WK
WW
%W
MMWMWWJ

�3WWﬂw/y/QWW7/W

/x£¢¢:W/ZW

~

ﬂ Mé/éex WA’8
75WW/iu7sﬁéw/A/AW/o
ﬂmwMM éﬂyiw/(Wga

ﬁ

WQM/yr/x
M.

inAM.
ﬂ/j/W/W/fgl/M ﬁﬁéz)’

aim/ah‘muzt

V

4

UM
a/“Z
A/dxﬁAMMW

-‘

��;WW%AM a/A/W

&amp;M
MmW%M;/A

Adm/M' ”#7

Wet/«.4145

W%WZ;¢M¢MA

w!
W
ﬁﬂéﬂﬁfdeWQMW'
WWWW m

km,MW7ML
L'

MM
_

WI/Jﬁ

W

W

.

'

-

�Q

.

MM
W
WWW
WM‘“
~AAAM/AAWM4’W

AM‘v/Wzy’g

A

'

$4MM wz/Z’WWW/

AMAWW AWM

�WWW
“WMMW
MM

WW

MMWMI "WK,
MZMMMVMW
ML,
I'M/”MW

W
W
ﬂbthxWM
WWW
/A%W/2Wg

MM7 MW.

V

WM

gifMMWﬂ/%M%‘7

4 MW
MZM
WM
7/134
(12%)
Mc/Zzw/anéﬂff"
Wm/m

Mzgf

�0%,.
MAW/WW wWM
Wr/WA/ZnaWk/
WWW—MW
//6W7/» f/A/ay/MW/

W

9Z2WWA»
ZaWZM'
A:
4w/
W/ﬁ
UV

ngégfiﬂmm

”2% M”;

j

�“”1“ ”PM“ “was

by ehetmeheek end euheequent

um

correlations batman elm

traumatic

eenelueiane from previous etudiee ere

m «was; We
Ge”

cut-cone have been unsuccessful.

«muted,

1

however. A11 pastime ﬁlth-A
~

seated to eleetroeheek thenpy nutter alteretione in the

"

electmneemme

patterns. Three pltteme ere generally described as 1) the

am ”3'“? am

of high voltage which pregneeeee to burst activity; the 3) Mutation at but:
3

frequencies in rate and amplitude. There 1e e direct relation between the
-

of these changes, and the

utmtien point of

number and frequency

ehmge 1e deeeriheé, which

meat, but whieh, seemingly,

frequeney and the type or

is

or treatments. In may

an

be maintained by

eebjeeahe

further

’6

‘

treetmt,

ship between degree of manifest

M0113
memory

the cited authors

is

lees and centueion

maneephnlegnphio abnormality. Ceeee ere eited of severe

the leek er

and

mm

‘

the degree of e

memory

We

with

significant electroencephalographic (ﬂange; and
ﬂeece: aﬁWii..¢m”e in cerebral rhythm without. with“ clinical

m

Manet memory inpeimnt. In theee zeperte, aphasia in "month"
he: on such organic ashram also earmletihg poorly we azmm
rem! te ,

.,

not inereeeed. Alec, such electmeneephalegmmw

Another area of easement

few treatments and without

6:3

7‘
g“3*

�PM

n2.

awn”, homer.

Two

my be cited which mud n oomlatiem

ham

clinical improvemnt. Rowland, Halo
mud, Kaufman and Peanut: in this 19% study of involutional woman ~( chums
in the olectmncophalegm and in the accretion of 17 katostoroida new

Electmncaphalognphic oranges

wing alien-omen]:
ens-251, 19M).

and

at agitated depreaeion, Paychoum. Hod. Q:
a relation bunch changes in their clinical

therapy

roporbed

activity as the disturbed be:havior boom now must, tho 13 cps activity incmaed. So treatment
induced bohuviounl immanent, 13 ops activity diminished. with recurrent»
of symptm, thorn m.- an increase in the 1 time 13 ops activity.
rating scale and the per cent time

manly,

Mort

Pmdnm

by

Theory of
a

Bath (changes

Eloctroconmlaiw

EGT

action, we and

”no. of mums in which

EEG

13 cps

in the ma under Rumbas-ate Amsthaain
and Their Significance for the

hum

cm. Hem-own.

1. 261-280,

a relationship hottest: thiepontom manna

We: and the recovery process “solicited.

to inpmvomant.

By

that

it

Both noted

that slow

irregular in appuranm,
could not be ntiatuctorily related

mm antivity as new in a routine rcéord
and be confirmed the reports

1951) described

wan

adminlltermg an intravenous aolutian of a barbituuto

thmpentone, Roth elicited characteristic changes in the ma titer metroshock in mxy subjcct. Early than waé random irregular claw mu untidty,
bilaterally
which, with more treatment, increased to a highly

We),

synchronous, high amplitude delta runs and

bursts. The” urn chiefly

2.3 cm, with voltages of 200.350 uv and cantlnuoua durations of 30.80
seconds. Winn the mating mcord cum“: rhythmic: Golta activity, umpontem increased

its basic

pm»

its

Imam.

voltage and duration, spread
Roth believed

its

urea,

and

decmuod

that than chug" warn rehtod to the

a! recovery, although, mo concluded:

" Hanover, my development

at

a typical we cameo does slot ensure memory and 10 a! the 36 pntiontl who

am

men a

mag. rams to

me for longer m'tw wreaks. m

M
"Wu-v-

3‘
'

�~3¢

tmsicnt impmment in album).

"lat-d. to tho

EEG

«mating

EEG

oondition mom to be
pationto. .1: in are correct in

W cm in thanmommue aﬂoat

it would

ammo: with tho

seem, 31mg mat.

tho

of tho

patients develop typical changes, that the physiological basis for in-

provmnt is acquired by the majority or one»; it.
«man in promoting recovery.“

w or' my not pm

In the course of studiea of altered brain function induced by electron

at this mums. Hospital in New York, further day. on the ”Intimaships betmn EEG chanson and :31ch effects of electroshock were collected.
shock

The general

remain of

mum innoMga’oiom on the alterations in the

elontmhook mm omﬂmd, but. also, I doﬂnito relationship
between on“ attacks and tho clinical remit
«immtmted. Throo fooi
are presented today:
£30 with

-

m

(1)

Tho EEG

patterns following electroshock and their relation to

mpmmt.
(2) mo intercormlationl of

nativity.

mama; qmtifioaumo

or down

"

(3) The rolotion of those obaomtiona to a theory of electroshock
I

.

SUBJECTS

‘

action.

w W:

prior to treatment.

1

Twentyofour

common“ portion“ referred for ehctm»

shook were awaited.
An 8

and bipolar moording was

Elootmnoephalogms

channel Madonna instrument ,

and. Hypomtiution

mdlo electrodes,

m the only activation

technio mod. During ornament. records wore taken on the day
treatment, generally 25 to 31 hours after

worn don.

trauma“

after a.

.

��In this group

in

mt chum amiable or who

moan change was

transient immanent. 3m

amt. impa‘md.

of

chm ﬂuctuatians in behavior, at tins appearing.

appeamd much as they did

EV.

diffsmd in tha
third groups

mmm

or?

2

-

Strauss (Clinical

ham.
Bruin

that by tha and

boron.

Wu
In w

of the difficulties in evaluating impinmeﬁ'o.
aa’oimataa

of

w

H111 be
A

in than patients.

change

cam, by using this thmefald classiﬁmtim,

firlt and

sown pnuanu

shaved only equivocal or

But the ammo was not sua’oainod, no

tm¢mnt, they
We are “are

might. have

plum

ware

distinct.
total at 160

thus

11001113

differences botmn the

mm obtained in than

manta. Following the maggostion or Dr. Rana
me! mctmmphubgmc Studies
Garrolations a!
«.-

Electmneophalogmphiu and Antonia chanson in Cases with Organic

Dim.

Al. J.

Payout“... 3&amp;1: hz—so. 19%); the delta ind»:

:19th for thm lads (twahlupuriem.

anterior tampon)... vortex.
«comm of renaming for own land. The

and puriﬁed-aunt love)

for 180

don: mm is deﬁned

an the ﬁgment.

slmr.

1m

m

tin maupiod by waves

or

7

tsp:

daluninéex for the three loads, and the: highest
in my 1nd ware ten mm: and in the final tabulntiom
The average

or
c1011»

Simultmebunly, tho ruéorci was scanned for the slowest freqmncy

m imuﬁod M. lean twice
wlta

Have;

ed, but

ivity,

m

in my load; the highest voltage of my
and. the ruration 01’ the longest burst. %er aspect: recordwe! in m final Malawian, worn m mgulamy of ham act.-

aim of Alpha activity“

and um

degm fraqmciu and amplitude

of fast activitiea. “than indie” ‘14 net land
study;

Qua

Inn

«mm diam

not.
by

thumb": to statistical
meow. Fat amounts." mm

identifiablo in all tho
the clinical administration of barbiturates. A: thin

'

��07‘!

Similar

mm» or the relation at nah or the: Macs and minim

mm mm mm. be tho group cum than boron. Slide 2
mmmmlaumormauummmmwmt. 1‘1»me
result.

the

much

upmd group Jump! to

cut-1y lam-wad

and unimpmvod group: mm: a

by tho 10-12

10—80%
A

52:: by tho 7-9

m
1123mm

tmtmntz mm

gnaw,

alum

-

the

#0

tmamm.

‘

similar out or our”: is demonstrated in 511603 for the man

um delta 1:: am 1nd.
In tho nut. slide the man ﬂaunt Imam in recorded, ma this
ahm tho am aigniﬂunt nhﬂomhipl. Whiz. the mania imprond

highest
too

‘

pox-«em.

patients than delta waves dam to 3 61:! or I.” by the «com! we]: or
tmtmnt, th- at)»: two groups mm: man h 03:: by my fourth wok cf

tutti-oat.

and;
The

S

and: improved group

tho fourth
the

much

new by

show

highar mm... by the

not the elitism:

Madly, slide 6
Vat

«minim for tho mean highest amntndu

chm the am

are

”mam far :11 three groups.

manta the mean

aunties: of bursts.

111

(nu-ﬂint}.

In

than

ml: of

Hot noted

long bun-at”

treatment. Burnt:

m

no less

”mg. m.

wave

neural

more than 7

{remnant in

W

m significantly 9119er

hen, the is the fact” or “gummy of hm“.
£91m!- rmthntly mm more maul“ in troqmcy

“plum!” than in the other We groups;
than studio: my be interpmud u demonstrating that

manure: of slow
and

The

patient: lbw longer hunts, winging
1W
tho third

unimprmd and modes-«uh inpmvod groups and

and

mm: mm: and by

activity

aria

from the

«wk

01‘

than

am myuological pm”,

m «imam in ablation to the diaturbmoos in earn-bun.

function induhd by elactmahock.

�3. ﬁnally, can these alterations in

npoets of «tubal function mid:
In

tho» undies,

the myriad.

1mm:

current-d with own:but been altered by olectroshaok?

mama af «tubal function were assayed-

tut or Weinstoin and m um 01' double

stimulation and

tom

text

showed a

W test

thus EEG.

013110?

any

m we ho

of

tan.

In than

ation of intuvumu

memory and

mum”

sodium

until.

racing. 0: than threw indies», only

correlation with

the subject

simultaneous

is

interviewed

1.21th and can
and’

qmatiom of orient-

mm, the quantum an reputed errors in

orientation, mnfabuhuan, dank). at 3.11am: and rsduplicauon are

mud

n 'poaitiw' myul tut, and are indicatiw of cerebral wilful-mum;
Comet roman to than qmstim after and an a ‘mgatiw' W'm “at.
In the wt click, #7. the pox-0mm positivc mm tom are
4

,

m
wanna. botmn tn.

cmpund for
meat. me

much

in titanium.

of the

m1.

gmupa, with the number or weeks

ovary patient

much

improm and

at

trut-

m other tam gram

.

in the and: improved group had u positive

mm by the third weak a! mama, m m abnomaiity panama;
in tho unimproved swaps only me patimm

had a

positive

as tram-£19m «opus command mam-m.
In 311d.
high degree

8. the an relation between,

1‘

EEG

abnomlity

shows a

maul? The“

.

’

tinntmaus tactile tom

inclines

alarm). maxim and tho

distinct carnation which in autism

tinny signifiemt.
Hint of tho

an

m1 and thin

ahmd no won-elation with

mama’s, it. can be concluded that

tutu of wry and
impromt. In an:

and the

than are axiom! typo. of mmbml

dam-

m cannot. speak in gm tom 9! g hrk a! comhum
batman m m and 00me dyarnncum or organic payment,
function tad taut

�‘9.
this point I should like us muss m findings and mass
thoughts as to thsir significance for s theory or electmshoak mm.
At.

m

moss

is 11m. doubt that eloctmshwk

m. It

3.:

all

upmsds to

almr,

symwio,

We.

induces delta nbnomnty

1::

tbs

may frontal, but with Mmamrtmmm,
With

immune trusmt thaﬁsqmncios beam

the smplitudu higher, tho

bunt activity longer sad more regular.

mile den: sbnomlity is pussnt in every mpord “ﬁr olsctmhock, its
Roth‘s mum‘s mammg Manning emu .mmw
«gm 9.:
with bat-bum“ are Digniﬂmt 1n pmﬁmg the 11m” emu Mum by

«wk.

furthsr slntroahwk. In sans subjects

sanity

is

not. induced

despite atoms.”

Our aux-relations of

Guam

0!."

test, um s meeasary
chm-"u fail to wear in the

tram.

delta

ammlity with 13pm srs

«:1»th thorium.

significant far tbs ”amiss: o:
alteration in cox-ohm function as

mm

War, a high dogma «hits smorAn

early, autumn

mm

by the EEG, and

(and in the

m1 taut),

also

by

m.

'

pmummﬁSiM for improvemt. when such
EEG

H

u sign-

nificmt clinical improvement V111 rail to wear in the patient' a hshs'dar.
with wry loss, points
Tbs rm. that than camlatiws mm not
to the poasihiuty that. this is not a significant master in improvement.
In conclusion, than studs.“ land uppers to s theory at E8?
action moﬁntly unwanted by Gamma sud can at us (Kuhn). Thou

“at

‘

authors postulstsd that

wwwmt fanning olactroshoek is than malt

of tbs amtion 1:: tbs patient 91' a min at altered brain function in
much now puttéms or mputim, a-srtioulorly mm a! denial; my be main--

mm. mm m nudist Winn that :5 «land milieu of «avatar-J.
museum u assured by mu abnormality is ,s pm~mu1s1u for improvisamt. ‘ro this extent the first. part. of ﬁns unseen-am Wall is
’“PPGTst

�%

m

W, mm

«was: m-

studs.» punt to
ﬂuaiﬁﬂﬁim of

m “grammar of quantum"

Wm

at

mum

'

�Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller.

To:
From:

Dr. Max Fink

May

I

have your approval to submit

this technical paper to the Eastern
EEG Society for its October meeting in
Bethesda ?

��mmmMmmwmtmmam
mm m m mum
as?

(3)

a»

in

mm. warm “at m

m a: m mam a: mm mm: mwvm

mmmmymmm mm,mzm

�112:?

My)

Quantitative Studies 2;: Slow

Wave

I M
9/5"!»

Activitz

Following Electroshock
Max

Fink,

HOD.

Robert L. Kahn, PhoD.

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks, New York

Despite repeated attempts correlations between slow wave activity induced
by electroshock and subsequent therapeutic outcasts have been unsuccessful. Howconclusions‘pfrom

W;

”avg/a...

rewart-m
previous studies?“
"W Wm“

Ail—pam-

over, certain
mduuo
are
Electroshock therapy suffer alterations in the electroencephalogram«a»‘ﬁz
9%.-

.

3m

Three pattems are generally describedzu

l)

b

slowing of the alpha frequen-

cies; 2) the appearance of random, synmetxic slow wave activity, generally of;
activity, and 3) diminution of beta frehigh voltage which

Wﬁbwburst

quencies in rate and amplitude. There is a direct relation between the degree
of these changes, and the number and frequency of treatments. In many subjects
a saturation point of change

treatment, but

the pretreatment levels
mnnbe r,

described, which can be maintained by further

is
which”
are reversible.

Qfﬂdeef Mir.
not increased.
The

ographic changes

the

is

«he,

we!“ c,at!”

5mm electroencephal-

rate of return of the cerebral patterns to

is generally l to

b,

weeksxgﬂ’ipending

directly ugh- on

frequency and the type of treatment.

cited authors is the lack of direct relationship between degree of manifest memory loss and confusion and the degree
Another area of agreement among the

of electroencephalographic abnormality. Cases are describedgevere

memory changes

with few treatments and without significant electroencephalographic change; and

also of severe changes in cerebral
or memory impairment.

In these reports,

Weclinical
is

correlatgug poorly With
organicconfusion also
Presented

at the Eastern

E E

W

rhytlmls without manifest

0 Society, Bethedda)

-~--

clinical confusion

&gt;

Md

“HA0?

8 such

gM’Y’EJ

results.
-

Septembee 30,

”0...... «.~.—.._._,___...~—-—

4...“ ._....

195?

�Two

studies, however,

may be

cited as noting a correlation between

ectro-

u:
encephalographic changes and clinical improvement. Hoagland, Malamud, Kaufman
rt-

ﬁdand Pincus in

their l9h6 study of involutional

L’

women

‘1)

-

tonnage-MW:
reported a

=§W19§9+

relation between changes in their clinical rating scale and the per- cent time
4'40

W61
131, ‘ctivity.

more than

3.2% activity increased.

cw

activity diminished.
%

A

time 1301;: a
More

As

treatment induced behaviojral improvement,—-B=eps

tivity.C3,)
Roth

ﬂ"

there

was an

MK,

increase in the

.

Mow-W

.--__

,

WWW-WBW‘UI
relationship
msngmmeWeWw5M—
the

Mby.
~.

the disturbed behavior became more manifest, the

With recurrence of symptoms,

e WA

recently,

As

.

1

described a

between thiopentone induced

EEG

changes and

recovery process. Roth noted

that slow wave activity as seen in a routine post-shock record was irregular in
appearance, and he confirmed the reports that it could not be satisfactorily

m

,

related to improvement.

the

However, by administering an intravenous

thiopeﬁ‘tone, he

elicited characteristic

changes

solution of

in the

EEG

after

electroshock in every subject. Early’there was random irregular slow wave act-

ivity, whichyéith

increased to a highly rhythmic, bilaterally

more treatmen

synchronous, high
amplitude delta runs and

M ILKoVol'PS

bursts.

These were

with voltages of 200-350 is and continuous durations of 30-80 seconds.

When

its

the resting record evinced rhythmic delta activity, thiopentone increased
voltage and duration, spread

its

believed that these changes were

m F4»
lemma;

chiefly 2-3

area, and decreased its basic frequency.
related to the process of recovery, and

Both
v

�he concluded: “The development of a typical
and 10 of the 36

patients

who

attained such a

than two weeks. But transient improvement

related to the
ing the

EEG

EEG

change does not ensure recovery

failed torsmit for longer
in clinical condition seemed tolae
change

in these patients.
changes with the therapeutic effect it
EEG

change even

If

we

are correct in connect-

would seem,

since most of the

patients develop typical changes, that the physiological basis for improvement
is acquired by the majority of cases; it may or may not prove effective in promoting recovery."

Whileathesettwoﬁstudiessdemonstrate a relationship between clinical result
and

EEG

abnormality, the majority of reports

fail to

do so.

It is

not likely

that this discrepancy is the result of different populations, but rather, the
differences in methods of evaluating improvement, the time of evaluation, and
differences in estimating changes in cerebral function.
In the course ofestudies of altered brain function induced by electroshock

at the Hillside Hespital in

further data on the relationship! be~
tween EEG changes and clinical effects of electroshock were collected. The
general results of previous investigations on the alterations in the EEG with
New

York,

electroshock were confirmed, but also, a definite relationship between

effects and the clinical result

was demonstrated. Three

EEG

foci are presented

today:
(1)

The EEG

(2)

The

patterns following electroshock and their relation to improvement.
intercorrelations of different quantifications of delta activity.

(3) Athe relation of these observations to a theory of electroshock action.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD:

Twenty~four consecutive patients referred

for electroshock

were studied. Electroencephalograms were done

treatment, at weekly intervals during treatment and after treatment.

prior to
An 8

channel

�.5‘
but the dramatic

in the

change so evident

patient continued to

first

group was not apparent.

Each

noticable disturbance such as obsessional think-

show some

ing, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
C.
whom

Minimalyy or Unimproved:

In this group were placed seven patients in

change was not clearly noticable or who showed only equivocal or

improvement.
improved.

Some

showed

transient

fluctuations in behavior, at times appearing

But the changes were not

sustained,

so

that

somewhat

by the end of treatment,

they appeared.much as they did before.
we

are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement. Others might

have differed in the estimates of change in these

patients. In any case,

using this threefold classification, the differences between the

third groups will

be

by

first and

distinct.

EVALUATION OF EEG RECORDS:

A

total of

jects. Following the suggestion of

LJ.aPsychiatemgggnehZ-Sewwl9hhd,

w

160 records were obtained

in these subStrauss

the delta index was determined for three lead

(frontal-parietal, anterior temporal - vertex, and parietal-ear
lobe) for 180 seconds of recording for each lead. The delta index is defined
combinations

as the perbcent time occupied by waves of

7

cps or slower.

The average

for the three leads, and the highest delta index in any lead
indices used in the final tabulation.
index

Simultaneously, the record

was scanned

delta-

were the

for the slowest frequency identified

at least twice in any lead; the highest voltage of any delta wave; and the durb
ation of the longest burst.

(V)

�Ch.
Medcrart instrument, needle electrodes, and bipolar recording was used.

Hyperb

ventilation was the only activation technic utilized. During treatment,:records
were taken the day

after, generally 25 to

31 hours

The treatments were administered by the
C

h? electrostimulator.

number of treatments

after treatment.

staff psychiatrists, using

a Reiter

Treatment schedules were three times a week; and the

varied

from 9 to 33.

As

patients

Showed

clinical improve-

ment, the
There

psychiatrist tended to give fewer treatments, and more widelyfspaced.
were 15 women and 9 men in the series, and ages ranged from.2h to 68 with

a median of h7.
EVALUATION QE CLINICAL RESPONSE:

All the patients
eight

were observed

for at least

after termination of therapy.
determined on the basis of the res-

weeks

patient's reaponse to electroshock was
ident psychiatrist's impression, staff opinion, the nurse's notes and the clinical evaluation of the supervisor in charge of electroshock. The patients were
The

divided into three groups
A.

Markeglz ggproved:

~

markedly improved, moderately improved and unimproved.
The 11

cases in this group were regarded as showing

recovery or marked improvement. These patients no longer showed the
which brought them

symptoms

into the hOSpital; their doctors felt they were better;

and

the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects as being able to sleep without medic-

ation, better appetite, and improved capacity to get along with the other patients and participate in hospital activities.
six patients in this group showed some improvebut continued to manifest indications of mental illness. These patients

B. iModerately ggprove : The
ment

typically Showed symptomatic relief, i§,, acute depressive features might be gone,

�On

the basis of these five indices of slow

wave

activity the records

placed in a rank order from the greatestabnormality to the lowest.
cords were then divided into

3

groups

-

g

uﬁbr

were

The 160

third - high degree

EEG

re-

abnorm-

ality) and lowest third =£w degree abnormality.
RESULTS:1.0ur results show a positive correlation between early high degree

EEG

abnormality and improvement. These relationships are demonstrated in
Slide

I.

utilizing these quantifications of slow wave abnormality induced by electroshock, we conclude that such EEG abnormality induced in the first 3 weeks of
‘By

is

treatment

an

essential pre-requisite for the short term favorable clinical

response.
2. What relationships exist between each of the indices,

clinical response, and then

/

amongst each

first with

the

other?

Similar analyses of the relation of each of the indices and clinical result

identical curves to the group curve shown before. Slide 2 shows the
relation of the delta index to improvement. The mean index in the much im-

showed

proved group jumps to

52%

by the 7-9 treatment; while the moderately improved

and unimproved groups show a gradual, slow increase to 10-20% by the 10-12

treatment.
A

similar set of curves id demonstrated in slide

3

for the

mean

highest

percent time delta in one lead.
In the next
shows

the

show

delta

other

two

Slide

same

slide the

slowest frequency

is recorded,

significant relationships. While the

and this) tbo/

much improved

patients

to 3 cps or less by the second week of treatment,
groups Sarely reach )4 cps by the fourth week of treatment.
waves down

5

shows the same

much improved group show

week the

mean

correlations for the

mean

and-

*{e

highest amplitude, the

higher voltages by the second week and by the fourth

differences are persistent for all three groups.

�Finally, slide

6 shows

the

duration of bursts.

mean

The

records of the

much Improved

patients

third

treatment. Bursts are less frequent in the unimproved and

week of

show

longer bursts, averaging more than

7

seconds by the
mod-

erately improved groups and are significantly shorter in duration. not noted
here, however, is the factor of regularity of bursts. In the longer bursts,
wave forms frequently were more regular in frequency and amplitude, than in the
other

two groups.

These studies may be interpreted as demonstrating

of slow wave activity arise from the

same

that each of these measures

physiological process, and assume the

significance in relation to the disturbances in cerebral function induced
by electroshock.
same

I

3. Finally, can these alterations in the
pects of cerebral function which

EEG

may have been

be correlated with other ap-

altered by electroshock? In

these studies, three other indices of cerebral function were assayed - the
amytal test of Weinstein and Kahg? tests of double simultaneous tactile stim-

ulatioaj and tests of
amytal

test

showed a

memory and

recalfz)

Of

these three indices, only the

positive correlation with

improvement and.with the EEG.

results were presented recently at the American Psychiatric Association
we will forgo a discussion at this time. ‘93
__,wle

These
and

It.;::; suffice

demonstrates the correlation berel
éF,
tween the amytal eating and the high degreerhEG abnormality. n—v_
this iigﬁgLshows
ﬁb£

that the next slide, #

7

'

,

distinct relationship between the two factors.
At this point I should like to summarize our findings and express some
thoughts as to their significance for a theory of electroshock action. There
is little doubt that electroshock induces delta abnormality in the EEG. It is
a

symmetric, chiefly

frontal, but with increasing treatment, spreads to all leads.

With increasing treatment the frequencies became slower, the amplitudes higher,

the burst activity longer and more regular.

in every record after electroshock,

its

‘While

degree

delta abnormality is present

is variable. Roth's experiment's

�~8-

inducing increasing delta abnormality with barbiturate are significant in predicting the later changes induced by further electroshock. In some subjects
however, a high degree delta abnormality

is not

induced despite extensive

treatment.
correlations of degree of delta abnormality with improvement are also
significant for the theory of the mechanism of electroshock. An early, SusOur

tained alteration in cerebral function as measured by the EEG, and also by the
amytal test, appears to be a necessary pre-requisite for improvement. Where

*-

in the amytal test), the:
the patient's behavior.
€l%n ificant clinical improvement will fail to occur in
fact that the correlations were not evident with memory loss, points to the
possibility that this is not a significant factor in improvement.
such changes

fail

to occur in the

EEG

(and

The

In conclusion, these studies lend support )to a theory of EST action recently
(Kahn)(.r These
authors postulated that
enumerated by Weinstein and one of us
improvement following electroshock

is the result

of a milieu of altered brain function in which

of the creation in the patient

new

patterns of adaptation, part-

icularly those of denial, may be maintained. These EEG studies demonstrate
that an altered milieu of cerebral function as measured by delta abnormality
is a pre-requisite for improvement. To this extent the first part of tbs Weinstein-Kahn hypothesis

is supported.

Secondly, these studies point to the

validity or quantitative

the elucidation of mechanisms of behavior.

EEG

studies for

�1533

m a???"

September 21, 1955
MEMORANDUM

TO:
FROM:

Dr. Soseph S. A. Miller
Dr.

(1)

Max

Fink

entitled "Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity
Following Electroshock" will be presented at the Eastem EEG meeting
at
Our paper

Bethesda, Friday September 30th.
(2)

May

I

have permission for Dr. Kahn (the co-author) and myself to

attend the sessions of the society?

�(new?

'

£5)“;

saw» 21.. 1955
m!

m1

Mamaahamr

”gum

(1) our

W amt-MM *mpmuu saw» a: 3m 1m Mtiviw

(a) lily

1:

MWMWﬂnbapWMWMMWmM at
whim! is!»

ma pammaa tear m».

”aim at the am

m (m mama!) and W ta

357‘

�III:
Quantitative Studies 2;

Slow Wave

9/55

Activity

Following'Electroshock
Fink,

Max

MOD.

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks, New York

Despite repeated attempts, correlations between slow

wave

activity in-

duced by electroshock and subsequent therapeutic outcome have been unsuccessful.
However,

certain conclusions are warranted from previous studies (1). Electro-

shock therapy induces

alterations in the electroencephalogram in all subjects.

Three patterns are generally described: 1) slowing of the alpha frequencies;
2) the appearance of random, symmetric slow'wave

voltage which

cies in rate

may

activity, generally of high

appear as burst activity; and 3) diminution of beta frequenThere

and amplitude.

is

a

direct relation between the degree of

these changes, and the number and frequency of treatments.
a saturation point of change

is described,

to the pretreatment levels

The

1

to h weeks, depending directly on the

treatment.

relationship between degree of manifest

memory

degree of electroencephalographic abnormality.

memory impairment.

in cerebral

loss and confusion

of

direct

and the

Cases are described of severe

at the Eastern

EEG

rhythms without manifest

In these reports,

ganic confusion also correlates poorly with
Evesented

is the lack

with few treatments and without significant electroencephalographic

change; and also of severe changes

confusion of

further

Such induced electroencephal-

Another area of agreement among the cited authors

memory changes

subjects

rate of return of the cerebral patterns

is generally

number, frequency and the type of

many

which can be maintained by

treatment, but which is apparently not increaSed.
ographic changes are reversible.

In

it is

clinical

stated that such or-

clinical results.

Society, Bethesda, September 30, 1955.

�-2studies, however,

Two

cited as noting a correlation between

may be

electroencephalographic changes and clinical improvement. Hoagland, Malamud,

in their l9h6 study of involutional

Kaufman and Pincus

women

relation between changes in their clinical rating scale
time more than 13 cycles per second

activity.

and the

per-cent

the disturbed behavior be-

As

manifest, the fast activity increased.

came more

(2) reported a

treatment induced behavior-

As

al improvement, such fast activity diminished. With recurrence of
there

was an

More

induced

increase in the

Roth (3) described a

recently,

EEG

time 13 cycles per second

%

provement.

Roth noted

it

tone, he elicited characteristic changes in the
was random

irregular

and

bursts.

w

act-

wave

solution of the thicpen-

EEG

after electroshock in every

slow wave

activity, which increased

bilaterally synchronous, high

with mere treatment to a highly rhythmic,

litude delta runs

51

was

However, by administering an intravenous

subject. Early, there

that

irregular in appearance, and
could not be satisfactorily related to imr

ivityas seen in a routine post-shock record
reports that

activity.

relationship between thiopentone

changes and the recovery process.

he confirmed the

symptoms,

amp-

chiefly 2-3 cycles per second, with

These were

voltages of 200-350 microvolts.and continuous durations of 30-80 seconds.
the resting record evinced rhythmic delta activity, thiopentone increased
voltage and duration, spread

its

believed that these changes were

patients

than

But

two weeks.

related to the
ing the

patients

EEG

EEG

transient

change even

improvement

change does not ensure recovery

failed to remit for longer
in clinical condition seemed to be
change

in these patients. If

effect

it

we

are correct in connect-

would seem, since most of the

typical changes, that the physiological basis for

by the majority of cases;

moting recove 1y."

EEG

attained such a

changes with the therapeutic

deveLOp

is acquired

who

its

area, and decreased its basic frequency. Roth
related to the process of recovery, and he

concluded: "The development of a typical
and 10 of the 36

'When

it may or may not prove

improvement

effective in pro-

�.3While these two

studies demonstrate a relationship between clinical result'

and EEG abnormality, the majority of

reports

fail

to

do

It is

so.

not likely

that this discrepancy is the result of different populations, but rather, the
differences in

methods of evaluating improvement, the time of

evaluation, and

differences in estimating changes in cerebral function.
In the course of studies of altered brain function induced by electro-

at

shock

the Hillside Hospital

in

New

York,

further data

on

the relationship

clinical effects of electroshock were collected. The
general results of previous investigations on the alterations in the EEG with

between

EEG

changes and

electroshock were confirmed, but also, a definite relationship between

effects and the clinical result

was

EEG

demonstrated. Three foci are presented

today:
(1) (The

EEG

patterns following electroshock

and

their relation to

imp

provement.
(2)

The

(3)

The

SUBJECTS

intercorrelations of different quantifications of delta activity.
relation of these observations to a theory of electroshock acticn.

AND METHOD:

Twenty-four consecutive patients referred

for electro-

shock were studied. Electroencephalograms were done

prior to treatment, at weekly intervals during treatment
An 8

and

after treatment.

channel Medcraft instrument, needle electrodes, and bipolar recording

was used.

Hyperventilation

was

the only activation technic utilized.

treatment, records were taken the day after, generally 25 to
treatment.
The

Reiter

C

31 hours

During

after

treatments were administered by the staff psychiatrists, using a
h?

electrostimulator.

Treatment schedules were three times a week;

and the number of treatments varied from 9 to 33.

improvement, the

As

patients

psychiatrist tended to give fewer treatments,

showed

clinical

and more widely

�.u.
There were 15 women and 9 men

spaced.

to

68

in the series,

and ages ranged from 2h

with a median of h7.
g3

EVALUATION

CLINICAL RESPONSE:

All the patients

were observed

for at least

eitht weeks after termination of therapy.
patient‘s reSponse to electroshock'was determined on the basis of the
resident psychiatrist's impression, staff opinion, the nurse's notes and the
clinical evaluation of the supervisor in charge of electroshock. The patients
The

were divided

into three groups - markedly improved, moderately improved and

unimproved.
A.

Markedly Improved: The 11 cases

in this group

showing recovery or marked improvement. These
symptoms which

brought them into the beepital;

patients

were regarded as

no longer showed

the

their doctor felt they were

better; and the nurses' notes confirmed such aSpects as being able to sleep
without medication, better appetite, and improved capacity to get along with
the other patients and participate in hospital
B.
improvement

activities.

six patients in this group showed some
but continued to manifest indications of mental illness. These

Moderately,lmproved:

patients typically

The

showed symptomatic

relief, i:g;, acute depressive features

might be gone, but the dramatic change so evident in the

apparent.

Each

patient continued to

show some

first

group was not

noticable disturbance such as

obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
C.

Minimally g£_unimproved: In

this group

were placed seven

patients

in whom change was not clearly noticable or who showed only equivocal or transient improvement. Some showed fluctuations in behavior, at times appearing
somewhat improved.

But the changes were not

treatment, they appeared

much

sustained, so that by the

as they did before.

end of

�.5are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement. Others might
have differed in the estimates of change in these patients. In any case, by
we

using this threefold classification, the differences between the
groups

first and third

will be distinct.
93

EVALUATION

delta index

EEG RECORDS:

was

A

total of

160 records were obtained

in these sub-

jects. Following the suggestion of Strauss (h), the
determined for three lead combinations (frontal-parietal,

anterior temporal - vertex, and parietal-ear lobe) for 180 seconds of recording
for each lead. The delta index is defined as the per-cent time occupied by
waves of 7 ops or slower.

delta-index for the three leads, and the
highest delta index in any lead were the indices used in the final tabulation.
The average

for the slowest frequency idenp
tified at least twice in any lead; the highest voltage of any delta wave; and
the duration of the longest burst.
Simultaneously, the record

0n the

was scanned

basis of these five indices of slow

wave

activity the records

were placed in a rank order from the

greatest abnormality to the lowest.

160 records were then divided

into

groups

abnormality, and lowest third

=

RESULTS:

in Slide

3

- i;g=_upper third=

The

high degree

EEG

low degree abnormality.

l.

Our

EEG

abnormality and improvement. These relationships are demonstrated

results

show a

positive correlation between early high degree

I.

utilizing these quantifications of slow wave abnormality induced
electroshock, we conclude that such EEG abnormality induced in the first 3
By

of treatment

is an.essential pre-requisite for the short

term favorable

by
weeks

clinical

response.
2.

What

relationships exist between each of the indices,

clinical response,

and then amongst each other?

first with

the

�~6-

Similar analyses of the relation of each of the indices and clinical result

identical curves to the group curve shown before. Slide 2 shows the
relation of the delta index to improvement. The mean index in the much improved
showed

group jumps to

52%

by the 7-9 treatment; while the moderately improved and un-

improved groups show a gradual, slow

increase to

10720% by

similar set of curves is demonstrated in slide

A

3

the

10-12

for the

mean

treatment.
highest

percent time delta in one lead.
In the next slide the
shows the same

delta

show

other

two groups

to

the

same

much improved group show

week

h cps by the

much improved

While the much improved

fourth

correlations for the

week of

mean

all three

6 shows the mean duration of

patients

this, too,
patients

treatment.

highest amplitude, the

higher voltages by the second week and by the fourth

the differences are persistent for
Finally, slide

and

cps or less by the second week of treatment, the

3

rarely readh

5 shows

is recorded,

slowest frequency

significant relationships.

waves down

Slide

mean

show

groups.

bursts.

The

longer bursts, averaging more than

records of the
7

seconds by

the third week of treatment. Bursts are less frequent in the unimproved and
moderately improved groups and are significantly shorter in duration. Not noted

here, however, is the factor of regularity of bursts. In the longer bursts,
forms frequently were more regular

wave

in frequency and amplitude, than in the other

two groups.
These

ures of
the

studies

may be

interpreted as demonstrating that each of these meas-

activity arise from the same physiological process, and assume
significance in relation to the disturbances in cerebral function in-

31 w wave

same

duced by

electroshock.

3. Finally, can these alterations in the
pects of cerebral function which

may have been

EEG

be correlated with other as-

altered by electroshock? In

these studies, three other indices of cerebral function were assayed - the amytal

�-7-

test

of Weinstein and Kahn (5),

(6),

and

tests of

memory and

tal test

showed a

positive correlation with

tests of double simultaneous tactile stimulation
recall (7). Of these three indices, only the amyimprovement and with the EEG.

These

results were presented recently at the American Psychiatric Association and we
will forgo a discussion at this time. It may suffice that the next slide, # 7,
demonstrates the correlation between the responses on amytal
of

abnormality. This graph

EEG

tests

and the degree

distinct relationship between the

shows a

two

I

factors.
this point I should like to summarize our findings and express
thoughts as to their significance for a theory of electroshock action.
At

is little

doubt

that electroshock induces delta abnormality in the

symmetric, chiefly

There

It is

EEG.

frontal, but with increasing treatment, spreads to all leads.

increasing treatment the frequencies

With

some

became slower, the amplitudes

the burst activity longer and more regular. While delta abnormality

in every record after electroshock,

its

higher,

is present

is variable. Roth's experiment's

degree

inducing increasing delta abnormality with barbiturate are significant in predicting the later changes induced by further electroshock. In some subjects
however, a high degree delta abnormality

is not

induced despite extensive

treat-

ment.
Our

correlations of degree of delta abnormality with

significant for the theory of the

mechanism of electroShock.

tained alteration in cerebral function as measured
amytal

test,

such changes

clinical

improvement are also
An

early, sus-

by the EEG, and

also

by the

appears to be a necessary pre-requisite for improvement. Where

fail

to occur in the

improvement

in the amytal test), then significant
will fail to occur in the patient's behavior. The fact that
EEG

the correlations were not ivident with

(and

memory

loss, points to the possibility

that this is not a significant factor in improvement.
In conclusion, these studies lend support to‘a theory of
enumerated by Weinstein and one of us (Kahn) (8).

EST

These authors

action recently
postulated.that

�-8improvement following electroshock

of a milieu of

is the result of the creation in the patient

altered brain function in which new patterns of adaptation, part-

icularly those of denial, may be maintained. These EEG studies demonstrate
that an altered milieu of cerebral function as measured by delta abnormality is
a pre-requisite for improvement. To this extent the
first part of the weinsteinKahn

hypothesis

is supported.

Secondly, these studies point to the
.

for the elucidation of

validity of quantitative

mechanisms of behavior.

EEG

studies

�REFERENCES

l.

Chusid, Joseph G. and Pacella, Bernard L.:

the Electric Shock Therapies, J. Nerv.

The Electroencephalogram
&amp;

Dis., 11g: 95-107, 1952.

Ment.

Hoagland, H., Malamud, W., Kaufman, and Pincus, 6.:
encephalogram and

in the Excretion of

17

in

Changes

in the Electro-

Ketosteroids Accompanying Electro-

shock Therapy of Agitated Depression, Psychosom. Med., §; 2&amp;6-251, 19h6.

3. Roth, Martin: Changes in the

EEG

Under

Barbiturate Anesthesia Produced

Electroconvulsive Treatment and Their Significance for the Theory of
Action,

EEG

by
ECT

and Olin. Neurophys., 2; 261-280, 1951.

Strauss, Hans: Clinical

and Electroencephalographic Studies ~ Correlations

of Mental, Electroencephalographic and Anatomic Changes in Cases with
Organic Brain Disease,
So

Am.

J. Psychiat., 191:

and Kahn, R.L.:

weinstein, E.A.,

("Amytal Sodium")

Diagnostic

hZ-SO, l9hh.

Use of Amobarbital Sodium

in Organic Brain Disease,

Am.

J. Psychiat., 192: 12,

889-89h: 1953.

6. Fink, M., Green,

M.

and Bender, M.:

The Face-Hand

Test as a Diagnostic Sign

of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurology, 2: h6-58, 1952.
7.

Karin, H., Fink,

M.

and Kwalwasser,

5.: Relation of

Changes

in

Memory and

Learning to Improvement in Electroshock, Conf. “eurologica, 1Q: 88-96,
1956.

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Linn, L.: Peychosis During Electroshock
Therapy:
19.9.:

Its Relation to the

22-26, 1952.

Theony

of

Shock Therapy, Am.

J. Psychiat.,

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2474">
                <text>Quantitative studies of slow wave activity following electroshock. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 8:158, 1956. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2475">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2476">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-21a-025</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2477">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2478">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2479">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2480">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2481">
                <text>Several [preprint]s, drafts, and handwritten manuscripts of this title. Three short letters from Fink to Joseph S. A. Miller.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2482">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2483">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74450">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81011">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87572">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94133">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6736" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3789">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/d7a08df9cf0427fc8180966376064147.pdf</src>
        <authentication>df0afef232047bc6a8f732705fc32387</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="104415">
                    <text>USPHS M—927

Final Report

ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION FOLLOWING ELECTROSHOCK

(Perceptual Changes Induced by Drugs and Electroshock)

the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry
Hillside Hospital
From

Glen Oaks,

L.I.,

N.Y.

September 1, 1959

�September 1, 1959

FINAL REPORT

weal
Department of Experimental Psychiatry
HILLSIDE HOSPETAL

1.,

Glen Oaks, L.

N. Y.
235$!

1

1.

Acknowledgment

2.

Summary

3.

Summary,Five Years, 195k

-

1959

27

h.

Publications,

195k

32

5.

Presentations

195k

-

1959
1959

37

195h

#h,

6.

Summary

#1,

September 1,

7.

Summary

3,52,

January 1, 1956

#3,

April

8.

Summary

-

February 1, 1958

1, 1957

September 1, 1959

-

2

January 1, 1956

hZA

- April 1, 1957

55A

- February 1, 1958

70A

Fink, M.D.

Principal Investigator

max

Research Associates (Experimental Psychology)

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.

Research Associates (Neurophysiology)
EEG

Technician

Secretary

Hyman

Karin, Ph.D.

Eric Karp,

M.A.

Martin A. Green,M.D.

195k 195h-1958
1958 1956 -

George Krauthamer,Ph.D.1959
Hanna Mosquera
Janet Bowie

'

Associates, supported through other grants:
Research
Research
Research
Research

Associate
Associate
Associate
Associate

(Experimental Psychol.)

(Psychiatry)
(Psychiatry)
(Sociology)

1956—1959
Joseph Jeffe, M.D.
Donald F. Klein, M.D. 1959 Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.l958 -

Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

1957

�Acknowledgment

These studies would not have been possible without the

of
Founder
of
Hillside Hospital,
and
the
support
interest
faith,
Dr. Israel Strauss, the Board of Directors, and the
Administrator, Mr. Maurice Bachrach, who sustained this program
during its early vicissitudes.

are also indebted to the Henry Kaufmann and the Dazian
Foundations of New York, the Foundations' Fund for Research in
and
the
Nassau
Board
County
of
Health
Mental
the
Psychiatry,
following pharmaceutical firms: Smith, Kline and French
and
Laboratories
Bristol
Geigy
Pharmaceuticals,
Laboratories,
We

Wyeth

Laboratories, whose support is gratefully acknowledged.

�September 1, 1959.

M-927

Altered Brain Function Following Electroshock
Progress Report #h
Max

Fink, M.D.,

February 1, 1958 - September 1, 1959

Director, Department of Experimental
Psychiatry

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks,

L.I.,

N.Y.

Associates:
Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.-Research Associate (Experimental Psychology.
y)
Psycholo
Eric Karp, M.A.-Research Assistant (Experimental
(Neurophysiology%
Martin A. Green, M.D.-Research Associate
Hanna Mosquera - Technician

Janet

Bowie -

Secretary

�-3ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION FOLLOWING ELECTROSHOCK
SUMMARY:

In the past eighteen months, the various studies of the
convulsive therapy process were completed and extended, and
The
begun.
agents
of
psychopharmacologic
an investigation
framework for these investigations has been the neurophysiologicand
1955;
Kahn,
(Weinstein
view
convulsive
of
therapy
adaptive
Fink and Kahn, 1957) extended to insulin coma and drug therapies
in psychiatry (Fink, 1957).
The following aspects of the convulsive therapy process
were studied:

A
Convulsion:
comparative study
the
of
1. gignificance
of the neurophysIoIogic, psychologic and behavioral effects
of electrical and inhalant (Indoklon) induced convulsions.
2. S Eﬁe
a tic Basis of Neuro h siologic Change: Further
effects of acute administration of experimental
studies of
"normal"
the
both
on
and
agents
sympathomimetic
anticholinergic
and post—convulsive EEG.
s
There
As
Convulsive
of
ects
ic
3. Sociopszcholo

of
the
of
factors
Relation
age, education,
a.
F
Scale)
the
California
by
(measured
and
stereotypy
nativity
to the selection of therapy, duration of hospitalization,
diagnosis and discharge ratings.
b. Changes of F score with treatment, and relation
of these changes to EEG indices.
Thera : In supervisory
chothera and Convulsive
h. PsaIteratIons
psychotherapeuggc
in the
relationship
sessions,
with convulsive therapy were observed.
5. Perception: Both patterns of change and individual
differences on ac stoscopic figure-ground discrimination
tasks and perception of the upright with induced convulsions.
These studies were extended to drug therapies and the
following studies undertaken:
1. Neurophysiologic:
EEG
of
change on acute and chronic
Relation
a.
administration of various psychopharmaceuticals to clinical
behavioral change.

III:

8/59

�potency.

actiVityo

b.

EEG

as a screening device for psychopharmacologic

c. Relation of

EEG

changes to hallucinogenic

effects of megimide.
2. Communication Patterns: Relation of induced neurophysiologic change to dyadic diversification and syntactic
d.

EEG

language measures.
3. §pciopsychologic Studies: Aspects of the doctorpatient relationship affecting choice of somatic therapy.

studies have supported and expanded the neurophysiologic-adaptive view of convulsive therapy, and demonstrated
that such a hypothesis has applicability to our understanding
of the mode of action of psychopharmacologic agents.
These

�~5-

‘mm

PROGRESS REPORT

A.

THE CONVULSIVE THERAPY PROCESS;

1.

Significance of the Convulsion:
An earlier convulsive-subconvulsive control study
had demonstrated that significant behavioral changes occurred
almost exclusively in patients receiving grand mal convulsive
therapy. The present report is an assessment of the neurophysiologic,behavioml, and clinical effects of two different
methods of inducing convulsions - electrical and inhalant.
Twenty-five consecutive patients referred for convulsive
therapy were randomly classified into two groups with
seizures induced in thirteen patients by the standard Medcraft

alternating current instrument, and in twelve by the inhalation
of hexafluorodiethyl-ether (Indoklon). In both groups treatment was administered three times a week for a total of 10
to 2b applications, determined by clinical criteria by the
supervising psychiatrist.
All patients were tested one to two days prior to the

first

treatment, following the 10-12th treatment, and two
weeks following the last treatment. In addition to evaluations
of behavioral change, tests included measures of intellectual
function (five subtests from the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence
Scale), perception (figure-ground discrimination using embedded
geometric figures, the perception of pseudoisochromatic color
plates at high speeds of tachistoscopic exposure, and the
Street incomplete figures test), and social attitude (the
Levinson revision of the California F Scale). An electro-

�-6encephalogram was obtained during each of the testing periods,
and measured for the per cent time slow wave (6 cps or

slower) activity from a continuous 66 second sample.
The results failed to show any significant intergroup test
differences between the electroshock and Indoklon groups at
each of the three test periods.

Intragroup analysis, however, showed that during treatment
both groups made increased errors on the intellectual and
perceptual tests, and had higher scores on the F scale. By
two weeks after the termination of treatment both groups
returned to near pretreatment levels for most tests.
Both groups were comparable for the degree of induced
EEG slow wave activity after 10-12 treatments.v The per cent
time slow wave activity for the Indoklon group was 51% and
for the electroshock group h7.5%. Within each group individual
differences in behavioral change were related to the degree of
neurophysiologic change - those with the highest degree of
EEG change showing the greatest behavioral change.
Rank order
correlations between changes in test performance and the
degree of slow wave activity with treatment were positive for
all procedures, except the comprehension subtest of the
Wechsler-Bellevue, and reached a level of statistical significance
for digit span (+ .61, p &lt; .01), object assembly (+ .h6, pr&lt; .05),
F scale (+ .38, p (' .05), tachistoscopic perception
(+ .67: P &lt;: .01) and perception of embedded figures (+ .h3,
p &lt;

.05).

�-7Two

different convulsant agents thus produced similar

neurophysiologic and perceptual behavioral changes; and it
was concluded that the behavioral change in convulsive
therapy is related to the degree of altered brain function,
and is non-specific for the type of agent used to induce the
convulsion.
(Presented, in part, at the Eastern Psychological Association,
Atlantic City, April, 1959).
2. Biochemical“nu—On.“—
Aspects of the Convulsive«non-mu...Therapy Process:
The significance of high voltage EEG slow wave activity
in the convulsive therapy process (Roth §t_al, 1951, 1957;
Fink and Kahn, 19S?) and the report that this activity was
blocked by the administration of such anticholinergic agents
as atropine and scopolamine (Ulett and Johnson, 1957) provided
the basis for these studies. As there were attendant
unpleasant systemic effects with the administration of these
agents, reports describing diethazine as an anticholinergic
compound with potent neurologic but minimal systemic effects
(Jenkner and Lechner, 1955; Lechner, 1956) led to studies
similar to those of Ulett and Johnson using this compound
(Fink, 1958). These observations with diethazine further led
to the investigation of other experimental anticholinergic

agents.
Clinical and electroencephalographic responses to the
intravenous administration of diethazine, Win-2299, benactyzine,
JB-318, JB-336 and atropine in psychiatric patients at various

�-8.
stages of convulsive therapy were studied. Each is a potent
anticholinergic agent in vitro.
The subjects were ninety psychiatric patients referred for
convulsive therapy, ranging in age from 18 to 67, with a
A
of
diagnoses.
total of 107 observations were made,
variety
as some subjects were studied with more than one compound.
The observations were made in the EEG laboratory using a
standard 8 channel instrument and needle electrodes. In each
trial, the compound under study was administevhd intravenously
at a set rate per minute until clinical behavioral or electrographic changes were observed.
It was observed that administration of these anticholinergic
agents was associated with a) desynchronisation of EEG
rhythms with a blocking of post-convulsive delta activity;
b) alerting, excitatory behavioral response with illusory,
delusional and hallucinatory ideation, and c) systemic
effects of muscular weakness, dryness of the mouth, dry skin
and tachycardia. The electrographic, behavioral and systemic
effects were concurrent.
These observations are regarded as consistent with the
suggestion that the physiologic basis of convulsive therapy
lies in an increase in central nervous system cholinergic

activity.
Observations that

LSD,

amphetamine, mescaline and diphen-

hydramine - sympathomimetic and antihistaminic agents - also

induced

EEG

desynchronization, blocking of post convulsive delta

�-9-

activity and clinical excitatory activity support the suggestion
that the behavioral and electrographic patterns of these
compounds are also based on an alteration in synaptic activity.
Increased synaptic activity (cholinergic, sympatholytic effects)
is associated with EEG hypersynchronization, and clinical
sedation and euphoria; while decreased synaptic activity
(anticholinergic, sympathomimetic) is associated with EEG
desynchronization and clinical excitatory and.ha11ucinogenic
states, thus supporting a hypothesis initially described by
Wikler (195h). It was also suggested in these studies that
the discrepant observations of EEG slow wave activity after
the administration of atropine was related to significant
differences in dosage and to species specificity.
(Presented, in part, at the Society of Biological Psychiatry,
San Francisco, 1958 and awarded the first A.E. Bennett
Psychiatric Research Award of that Society; and, in part, at
American EEG Society, Atlantic City, 1958. Published, in part,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
80:
and
380-387, 1957;
Psychiat.
accepted
for puﬁlication, EEG Clin. Neuropﬁisiol.)
3. Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatmen :
a. Duration of Hospitalization, Diagnosis and
Discharge Evaluation.
In an earlier study of the Hillside Hospital
population (Kahn, Pollack and Fink, 1957), it was noted that
age, education, place of birth and social attitudes as measured
by the California F scale, were related to the selection of
therapy. Those patients who were older, had less education,
were foreign-born and with high stereotypy scores on the F Scale

�likely to receive convulsive therapy. In contrast,
who
and
who
native-born
better
were
educated,
younger,
patients

were more

obtained low scores on the F Scale, received psychotherapy as
their sole form of treatment.
This study was extended to determine the relations of
these sociopsychologic factors to l) the duration of hospitalization, 2) the clinical evaluations at time of discharge,
and
was

final diagnosis.
The entire in-patient adult population on March
studied. This consisted of 171 patients, 57 men
3) the

7, 1957
and 11h

68
16
from
to
in
women, ranging
age
years, with a median of
35 years.
Patients hospitalized for the shortest period (1-5 months)
were noted to be the oldest, have the least education, were
most likely to be foreign-born, and have the highest scores on
the F Scale. Younger, native-born, more educated, lower F
score patients were hospitalized the longest (10 or more months).
The same relationship of these factors to length of hospitalization was found when separate analyses were made according to
diagnosis and type of treatment (convulsive therapy or psychotherapy).
Discharge evaluations of improvement were significantly
related to age - the older patients having the most favorable
ratings. Analysis of the data by type of treatment, however,
demonstrated that among the convulsive therapy patients ratings
of recovered or much improved were given to those patients with

�the highest
born.

F

scores, least education

and who were

foreign-

Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psychoneurosis were
associated with lower F scores, younger ages, more education

native birth.

older, less educated, foreign-born,
high F score patients were more frequently classified as
involutional or manic-depressive psychosis.
It was postulated that these relationships reflect the
influence of social background and psychological processes,
such as the behavioral patterns of communication and mode of
expression; and that these relationships contribute not only
to the pattern of mental illness, but affect all aspects of
the patient—therapist interaction.
(Presented at the Eastern Psychological Association,
Atlantic City, and the Academy of Psychoanalysis, Philadelphia,
April, 1959. Accepted for publication, Archives of General
Psychiatry.)
b. Changes in Social Attitude with Convulsive
and

The

Treatment.

earlier observations that the California
F Scale is useful in understanding the reason for referral for
convulsive therapy and the evaluation of clinical response
Following

following such treatment, further studies were undertaken with
this scale in regard to the following questions: 1) What does
the F Scale measure in a psychiatric population? 2) Do F
scores change with convulsive therqay? 3) Are these changes
related to the degree of altered brain function?

�-12-

entire in-patient population of the hospital was
given the F Scale, and one month later, was retested with
The

a

"reverse" F Scale, in which each statement was changed to the
opposite of the original. The "reverse" scale was scored in
the same manner as the conventional scale, with high scores

reflecting greater agreement.
It was noted that those patients who made low scores
initially, indicating a predominant disagreement with the
statements, showed an increase on the "reverse" scale,
indicating a high degree of agreement. In contrast, patients
who made high scores initially showed little change on retesting,
agreeing with the statements to the same extent even though the
meaning was reversed. It is evident that low F score patients
are more critical and discriminating persons, while those
with high F scores are more undifferentiating and stereotyped
in their reactions.
This observation is related to the process of selection
of patients for convulsive therapy. A high degree of stereotypy of thinking and communication is incompatible with the

establishment of a conventional psychotherapeutic relationship,
thus inhibiting the psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy
stressed at this hospital. It follows that the high F score
patients will be unsuccessful in psychotherapy and most likely
referred for convulsive therapy.
In another study, sixty-nine patients were given the F
Scale before, during (at 10-12 treatment period) and after

�-13convulsive therapy.

Ten

patients, selected at

random,

constituted a control group and received subconvulsive electroF
in
score of +5.7
mean
There
increase
was
a
stimulation.
during treatment in the convulsive group - a difference
5%
the
level. In contrast, the control group
at
significant
showed an insignificant change during the same period (+0.5).
The extent of increase in the convulsive patients was related
to the degree of cerebral dysfunction as determined by slow
(more
The
with
EEG.
delta
high
the
on
patients
wave activity
+8.6.
of
had
mean
increase
a
record)
h0$
of
the
sample
than
Those patients with low delta indices, however, showed an
F
the
treatment
scores were
Following
+3.h.
of
increase
comparable to the pretreatment levels.
These findings support and elaborate previous observations
on the effects of convulsive therapy. Greater agreement with
show
conventional
treatment
during
statements
Scale
the
F
in
Changes
discrimination.
and
in
difficulty
stereotypy
of
changes
language
the
characteristic
thus
score
parallel
cliche;
and
of
use
increased denial, evasion, qualification,
and stereotyped expressions (Kahn and Fink, 1958). It is
also comparable to the increased difficulty in complex visual
F

and
1957)
figureKorin,
tactile
ground discrimination (Kahn and Fink, 1957).
(Presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, 1958;
and accepted for presentation at the Divisional Meeting of the
American Psychiatric Association, New York, November 1959).
and

perception (Fink,

Kahn and

�-1hh.

Psychotherapy and Physiodynamic Therapy:
Previous studies indicated that patients referred for
electroshock in this hospital are of two types. The larger

older age who have limited education
and are foreign born. They tend to be non-introspective
persons, stereotyped in their language and thinking, and
verbally uncommunicative. Symptoms of depression, agitation,
withdrawal and somatization are prominent. The second, and
smaller, group of patients are younger,native-born, bettereducated, and verbally communicative with a capacity for
introspection. They characteristically exhibit thinking
disorders and overactive behavior, with lesser degrees of
somatization and depression.
Four patients, two from each group described above were
studied to determine 1) reasons for referral, 2) whether
different attitudes were required in psychotherapeutic
3) the relation of the psychotherapeutic
management, and
approach to the patient's clinical response to convulsive
therapy.
It was concluded that these patients were referred for
convulsive therapy because of difficulty in communication in
the psychotherapeutic relationship. In two cases this was
a reflection of the patient's limited verbal and introspective
capacity related to educational and social factors. In two
instances, however, the impaired communication was reflected
in acting-out behavior.
group are

patients of

an

�-15Following treatment, the older, less educated patients
were able to sustain the behavioral change with a reassuring,
supportive technique, amplifying tendencies to minimization
‘In
the better
and denial developed during electroshock.

educated patients, the decreased acting-out behavior was
associated with increased interpretive psychotherapy.
It was suggested that the relationship of psychotherapy

to convulsive therapy various with the communication pattern
and adaptation shown by the individual patient.
Published in the Journal of Hillside Hospital, 1: 17-25,
19 58 ).
5.

Perception:

have
of
procedures
test
perceptual-cognitive
variety
been studied in patients receiving somatic therapies.
a. The Tachistoscopic Perception of Embedded
Colored Figures:
This task was studied in an experimental group
consisting of 35 consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy,
and "control“ groups of 20 patients treated with phenothiaains
medication (thorazine and promazine) and ten patients receiving
no somatic treatment, matched for age. All subjects were
tested prior to treatment, and after four weeks; the convulsive
weeks
two
time
a
following the
third
were
tested
patients
A

.

cessation of treatment.

�-15There was a

statistically significant increase in

mean

errors with convulsive therapy, and a significant
decrease from the pretreatment scores following treatment.
"Control" subjects made significantly fewer errors at each
succeeding period. There was a significant difference in
EEG
low
between
showing
changes
as
classified
errors
patients
(per cent time delta) when compared with high EEG changes.
There were high retest correlations for all groups.
There were marked individual differences in response
patterns prior to treatment. With brain changes there was a
reduction in perseveration, completion and confabulation in
some patients, and an increase in others, with no unions
Even
in those
to
cerebral
dysfunction.
attributed
patterns
EEG
with
high
changes, the "style” of his response
patients
pattern was maintained. Thus a patient showing completion
type errors prior to treatment would continue to make such
errors with convulsive therapy, although the threshold at

number of

which completion was shown might change.

(Presented, in part, at the Eastern Psychological
Association, Atlantic City, April 1959).
b. Rod and Frame Test (Withinz: This task was administered
to h? patients consecutively referred for somatic therapy.
Marked individual differences in performance were correlated
with age, education and score on the California F Scale.
Patients whose judgment of the vertical was strongly influenced
by the surrounding frame (field dependent) were more frequently

�referred for convulsive therapy than drug therapy. No
significant change was found with drug or convulsive treatment.
For both drug and convulsive groups retest correlations
were high (+.86 and +.88). It is considered that individual
differences on the Rod and Frame test reflect personality
factors that are of importance in psychiatric treatment.

�-18B.

PSIGHOPHARMACOLOGIC STUDIES;

1. Neurophysiologic Asgects:
According to the neurophysiologic~adaptive view of

the convulsive therapy process, the clinical efficacy of
repeated induced convulsions is dependent upon the induction
of a persistent alteration in central nervous function,

providing a milieu for changes in the subject's interaction
with the examiner and the environment. In these studies the
best index of neurophysiologic change has been those aspects
of cerebral function reflected by delta activity in the
electroencephalogram (Fink and Kahn, 1957). The efficacy of
newer psychopharmaceuticals in altering psychotic behavior
patterns has led to the suggestion of a similar hypothesis
for the mode of action of these agents, and to studies of the
relationship and specificity of altered behavioral patterns
to neurophysiologic change as reflected in electroencephalography.
Of the psychopharmaceuticals tested in acute experiments
an increase in synchrony with or without an increase in slow
wave activity has been observed for chlorpromazine, promazine
and triflupromazine. Behaviorally, these drugs were associated
with
a) increasing sedation, drowsiness, denial and euphoria;
b) decreasing agitation, panic, excitement and delusional and
hallucinatory activity; and c) minimization and displacement
of symptoms. Barbiturates regularly induced an increase in
fast activity with an increase in synchrony, with the associated
behavioral changes of sedation, euphoria, denial and minimization.

�-19Amphetamine and methamphetamine increased fast activity
without increased synchrony and behaviorally were associated
with alerting, hypomania, excitement and increased motor

activity. Decrease in voltage and per cent time of slow
wave activity in subjects with post-convulsive delta activity
with LSD-25, benactyzine, Win-2299, JB-318, JB-336
and diethazine. Of these drugs, benaotyzine produced increased
alerting, excitement, tension and panic; the other drugs also
produced illusory sensations and hallucinatory, delusional
and paranoid ideation.
was seen

electrographic patterns were consistently altered
concurrently with behavioral changes both in the acute and
chronic administration studies. Tranquilization, euphoria,
sedation and minimization of symptoms were associated with
increased EEG synchronization and shift of frequencies to the
delta range. Agitation, tension, panic, excitement, illusions
and hallucinations were associated with desynchronization of
frequencies.
Similar patterns were demonstrated in subjects with
prior delta activity. Agents that tended to synchronize
frequencies, as chlorpromazine and barbiturates, augmented the
per cent time delta activity and enhanced the clinical patterns;
agents that desynchronized frequencies, as diethazine, LSD-25
and benactyzine, minimized the clinical effects typically
ascribed to repeated convulsions.
The

�-20.
Various experimental psychopharmaceuticals were tested.
In addition to extensive studies of b-b methy].ethylg1utarimide

hexaflnarodiethylether (Indoklon) the following
agents were studied; phenyltoloxanine(PRN-Bristol), methonalide
(ELM-188, Bristol), tropin-h-chlorbenzhydryl ether (WY-21h9,
(Megimide) and

Wyeth), dimethylaminoethanel and

varieties, Riker),

its

congeners (Deaner and

JB-318, 329 and 336 (various

piperidyl-

benzilates, Lakeside) and imipramine (Tofranil, Geigy).
Because significant behavioral and electrographic
changes were observed, a more intensive investigation of
imipramine (TofrEnil) was undertaken.

In

28

acute experiments,

consecutive patients referred for physiodynamic therapies were
tested in the EEG laboratory at various stages of treatment.
TofrEnil solution (10 mg/cc) was administered intravenously at
a set rate (1 cc/ho sec) until electrographic or behavioral
changes became prominezit, for a total of h0-125 mg (0.5-2.5
Behavioral observation and electrographic recording
continued for one to three hours. In patients referred for
pharmacotherapy because of manifest depressive, withdrawn or
retarded behavior oral TofrEnil of 75-350 mg was administered.
In the acute studies there was initial restlessness,
associated with dizziness, dry mouth, "faintness," nausea,

mg/kg).

and on four occasions, vomiting.

These symptoms

persisted for

lassitude, heaviness
eventual drowsiness. Heart rate was

10-20 minutes, and were accompanied by

of the extremities and
unchanged or slowed.

Blood pressure dropped by 20-h0% in

�-21..

older (age &gt; 60) patients. Subsequently, subjects were
relaxed, quiet and disinclined to activity, even when
returned to their ward.
The electrographoc patterns accompanying these behavioral
changes were initiated by a gradual decrease in voltages
during the injection. By ten minutes, the per cent time
alpha had been halved. In patients with moderate amounts
of beta activity, such activity occasionally increased in
voltage and per cent time. By twenty minutes, in association
with behavioral lassitude, low voltage (to 50 microvolts)
random theta frequencies (5-? cps) appeared. In records with
post-convulsive delta activity, there was a marked decrease
in voltage and per cent time of slow wave activity. These
% to two hours.
for
electrographic patterns persisted
There was considerable individual variability in this
acute EEG response. In patients who received 100 mg or more
of TofrEnil, EEG and behavioral changes were observed in all
but three. In six patients, dosage of TofrEnil less than 50
mg were associated neither with EEG nor with behavioral
changes.
In chronic Tofrénil studies, behavioral changes generally
appeared during the second, and were maximal during the third,
week of treatment. The most prominent behavioral adaptation
was euphoric denial. Patients complained less of somatic

displaced their illness
became increasingly difficult to discuss

symptoms, and denied, minimized or
on

inquiry.

It

�-22In
six
patients
them.
with
significant life relationships
and
depressive
increased
and
restlessness
somatization

agitation,
restlessness,
affect persisted.
of
cessation
the
to
excitement, insomnia and vomiting, les
five
patients
in
noted
were
symptoms
No
in
change
therapy.
In three,

therapy.
showed
administration
chronic
on
studies
Electrographic
Low
modulation.
record
a decrease in voltages with poorer
Well
10%
appeared.
to
up
cps)
activity
(5-7
theta
voltage
few.
a
in
prominent
more
became
defined fast activity

after four

weeks of

NeuroInternationale
(Presented at the Collegium
the
1958;
at
September,
Psychopharmacologicum, Rome,
March,
Montreal,
Conference on Depression and Allied States,
in
Published,
1959.
EEG
Society, June,
1959; and American
harmacolo
chc
Ps
of
s
C.I.N.P.;
Proceedin
the
in
gamed.
part,
Ps
Ass.
cﬁiat.
1959;
32§~332,
N.
Kline,
ed.
19E8.
Frontiers,
682-685,
and
Neurology
__3. _E: 1653117159959;
_8_:

Relationship
Therapist-Patient
of
the
2. Aspects
Affecting Choice of Therapy.
than
other
aspects
involves
The selection of therapy
the
In
the
of
patient.
the manifest behavioral patterns
been
have
problem
this
further efforts to clarify

past year

therapist-patient
and
frustration
that
We
have hypothesized
relationship.
and
implicit
relationship
hostility in the therapist-patient
have
a
significant
environmental
pressures
or explicit

the
in
factors
emphasizing
undertaken,

influence in referral for somatic therapy.
residents
with
interviews
76
structured
In a pilot study
somatofor
requests
and supervisors were initiated following

�-23-

therapy. These interviews were designed to elicit the basis
of the referral. It was found that in only relatively few
cases was there a change in the patient's clinical status
which directly led to the referral. In most instances there
had been no change or progression in the presenting symptoms.
Factors contributing to the timing of the referral included
impending discharge, avoiding administrative discharge, and
pressure from the patient's family or ward personnel. .It was
also noted that patients with similar behavior patterns were
treated differently, some given somatotherapy and others none.
The reasons for this ranged from "whim" to quantitative
differences in symptomatology and individual preferences for
type of treatment.
It was concluded that factors other than clinical
indication played a role in the referral in a significant
number of cases. These same extraneous factors also influenced
the timing of the referrals.
As a result of these findings a "Somatic Treatment Referral
Sheet" was developed (see Appendix) to be completed by the
therapist whenever somatic therapy is requested. This study
is continuing.

�-2h.
3.

Language

Patterns as Measures of Behavioral and

Neurophysiologic Change with Drugs.
In previous studies of the convulsive therapy process,
it was demonstrated that two language measures, a syntactic
content analysis (Kahn and Fink, 1958) and dyadic diversifica‘
tion scores of unstructured interviews (Jaffe, Kahn and
Fink, 1958) provided objective indices of behavioral change,
and were related to the degree of altered brain function. In
a further test of these language measures as indices of

behavioral and neurophysiologic change, they were applied to
interviews on acute administration of various psychopharmacologic
agents.
Seventy-two interviews with patients at various stages
of drug therapy have been analyzed, using the following
agents: amobarbital, benactyzine, chlorpromazine, diethazine,
lysergic-acid diethylamide, and Win-2299.
Following a routine electrographic recording, an unstructured psychiatric interview, with short periods of
structured inquiry, was tape recorded. With EEG running, an
intravenous injection was then given at a slow rate. When
specific electrographic or clinical changes were induced, the
interview was repeated. Recording periods of EEG and verbal
behavior were alternated for the duration of the observation
period. The EEG was measured for changes in synchronization,
shifts in dominant frequencies, and per cent time of slow waves
(delta) and beta frequencies.

�.25tape recordings were transcribed and measured for the
diversification of consecutive 25 word samples of speech of
The

both participants (dyadic) and for syntactic changes. In
the dyadic analysis, the pooled verbal behavior of both
participants was transcribed, divided into 25 word samples,

for each sample the ratio of the number of different
words to the total number of words (a diversification score)
was calculated. The syntactic language analyses were based
on the response to standardized questions using a method
previously described (Kahn and Fink, 1958), scoring such
changes as syntactic use of person, alteration in tense,
evasion, qualification, displacement or verbal denial of
symptoms, use of stereotyped expression or cliches, cryptic
response, and withdrawal or silence.
Consistent changes were observed in both the dyadic
diversification and syntactic language measures in subjects
classified according to the neurophysiologic and behavioral
effects of the drugs applied.
Amberbital and chlorpromazine are neurophysiologic
synchronizing agents. Amobarbital regularly induces high
voltage well synchronized fast activity at 20-2h cps, while
chlorpromazine administration is followed by increased synchronization of the EEG record and a shift to slower frequencies
including occasional slow wave burst activity. Behaviorally
these drugs are associated with sedation and tranquilization.
On the language measures there was an increase in stereotypy
and

�-26~

repetitiveness associated with increasing use of
alterations in tense, displacement and evasion.
and

/
cliches,

Diethazine, benactyzine, LSD-25 and Win-2299 are neurophysiologic desynchronizing compounds. These drugs are
characteristically associated with decreased voltage and
per cent time of alpha activity and increased irregular low
voltage fast activity. Behaviorally hallucinatory, excitatory
or illusory activity are observed. 0n the language measures
there was decreasing repetitiveness, wide diversity of words,
less variability of diversification scores, and decreased
use of cliches and alterations in tense.
Further exploration of language measures are suggested
as a rational basis for the understanding of the psychologic
effects of the new therapies.
(Presented at the Conference on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic and Sociamgic Aspects of the Neuroleptic Drugs in
Psychiatry, Montreal, April, 1958, and at the American
Psychiatric Association, Philadelphia, April, 1959).

�-27.
SUMMARY

lgsh - 1959

out-“n”
laboratories of the Department of Experimental
Psychiatry were established at Hillside Hospital in September,
19Sh. During this five year period neurophysiologic,
and
and
perceptual),
linguistic
(personality
psychologic
sociologic aspects of "somatic" psychiatric therapies have
been the principal foci.
The

Convulsive Therapy:
The view of the convulsive therapy process as the induction of a non—specific state of altered brain function,
similar to craniocerebral trauma was supported and amplified

1.

cerebral
Within
subjects
altered
milieu,
this
21).
ll,
were seen to respond in various ways (26), of which the most
"successful" was explicit verbal denial (7, 31). This latter
(10,

adaptation was most prominent in characterologically disposed
individuals (36).
An alteration in brain function was pre-requisite to
behavioral change (7, 8, 11, 26). Grand mal seizures were
essential to this process (26) but electrical induction was
not (B-h2). The alterations in brain function were measured
in various ways including electroencephalography (6, ll, 12,
2h, 39), language patterns (b, 7, 1h, 31, h3; B-2h), perceptual tasks (2, 16, 17, 3?, h6; B-26, hl, h2) and tests of
Reference numbers are to publications or presentations (Blisted in the appendix.

)

�recall (8).

It

suggested that the neurophysiologic basis of
convulsive therapy may lie in an alteration in central synaptic
cholinergic - adrenergic relationships, with a predominant
shift to increased cholinergic activity as the operationally
significant pattern. Such interpretations were based on the
was

relationship of high voltage

EEG

slow wave

activity to

behavioral change (6, ll, 26) and the blocking of post-convulsive
electrographic and behavioral changes by central anticholinergic
agents (21, 3h, 35, bl, h2) and central sympathomimetic agents
(h2).
A variety of behavioral changes were seen during convulsive therapy (26; B-l7). Such patterns were viewed as
adaptations to altered brain function, and were believed
dependent upon characterologic and environmental factors (7,
25, 26, 36, ho). Clinical ratings of improvement were seen as
value judgments by the observer of
behavioral change in
the subject (26). Adaptations characterized by denial
mechanisms, both in behavior (B-17) and in language (7, 31)
were seen as most favorably rated by the psychiatric staff.
Such adaptations were related to habitual modes of conduct
(character, personality} (36; B-ll, 32).
The persistence of the altered behavioral nodes was noted
as dependent upon the degree and duration of altered brain
function, the environmental expectations, and the type and

�+29-

degree of family and medical support (26).

Different
varying types of

behavioral patterns were best supported by
psychotherapy (19).
Measures of linguistic behavior in structured (7, 31)
and unstructured (1h, 29; B-2h) interviews showed characteristic alterations towards increased denial, minimization,
displacement, stereotypy and repetitiveness related to the
degree of altered brain function (B-Zh). These changes were
blocked or reversed by anticholinergic hallucinogens (21,h3).
Various perceptual tasks provided indices of behavioral
change and were related to the degree of altered brain
function. These included the perception of simultaneous
tactile stimuli (17), embedded (Gottschaldt) figures (37; 8-16),
and tachistoscopically exposed words (37) and embedded color
figures (hl).
Sociopsychologic aspects of age, years of education,
nativity and degree of stereotypy and conventionality
(measured by California F Scale) were related to selection of
therapy, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and treatment
response in hospitalized patients (15, 36, ho, hS).
2.
Neurophysiologic-Adaptive Hypothesis of Somatic Therapy.
Based on these studies, a hypothesis concerning the mode
of action of other therapies such as insulin coma, leucotomy
and psychotropic drugs, was expressed (10, 33, 38). This
view holds that the efficacy of these therapies depends upon
the induction of states of altered brain function, in which

�varying adaptive patterns may become prominent. The adaptive
pattern is related to the type, degree and duration of altered
brain function, the personality of the subject, and tolerances
and expectations of the environment.
Examination of
drug therapies
MY—2092

3.

is

this hypothesis as applied to psychotropic

now

in progress, supported by

USPHS

grants

and MY-2715.

Insulin

Coma

Therapy.

initial

case study showed the significance of denial
patterns and of persistent altered brain function for the
An

behavioral changes in insulin
In an insulin coma

therapy (3).
- chlorpromazine control study, no
coma

differences in hospital improvement ratings were observed in
the two treatment groups (27). Chlorpromazine was safer,
easier to administer, permitted continued administration and
allowed for greater degrees of concurrent relationship therapy
than insulin coma. These observations led to a replacement of
insulin some by psychotropic drugs in this institution.
h.

Pharmacotherapy.
The ongoing program in evaluating various psychopharma-

ceuticals is derived from these hypotheses. Electrographic
and linguistic analyses of effects of acute intravenous
administration and chronic clinical administration of various
new compounds are in progress. EEG patterns, along such
continua as synchronization-desynchronization and frequency
shift, and various perceptual, perceptual-motor and personality

�-31..
and
h2)
3h,
(21,
behavioral
bl,
to
related
being
tasks, are
linguistic changes (21, h3).
The neurophysiologic basis of experimentally induced

hallucinogenic states has been interpreted as an alteration
in synaptic chemical relations, such that the effective levels
of cholinergic activity is decreased (h2). Initial work on
this hypothesis (21, h2) is now being expanded.

�.132-"
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

195k - 1959
A.

Publications.

195h

Patterns of Perceptual Organization with Simultaneous
Stimuli. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 72: 233- 255.
Bender, M.B ., Green, E. andFFinE, M.
2. Standardization of the Face-Hand Test. “”""§z
Neurolo , h:

1.

211-217.

Fink,

M.

and Green,

1955.

M.

'

Delusional Reduplication of Parts of Body after Insulin
Coma Therapy. J. Hillside Hos ital h: 13h-1h7.
Kahn, R. L., Fin , . an
rau er ,
h. The Amytal Test in Patients with Mental Illness. J.
Hillside Hospital, h: 3-13. Kahn, R.L., Fink,'M.
and Weinstein, .A.
3.

1956

Denial of Blindness Following Cerebral Angiography.
J. Hillside Hos ital, S: 238-2h5. Fink, M.
6. Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following
Electroshock. EEG Clin. Neurophzsiol. Q: 158 (Abst)
Fink, M. and Ka n, R.L.
7. Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in
Electroshock. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Ps chiat. 76: 23- 29.
E. A.
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M. and Weinstein,
8. Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to Improvement
in Electroshock. Conf. Neurol. 16: 88- 96. Karin, H.,
Fink, M. and Kwalwasser, §.
5.

9.

Evaluation of High-Dose Reserpine Therapy for the Relief
of Anxiety.
Wachspress,
Hillside Hospital killer,
. 67- 77.
J. S .A.
M., Blumberg,'I'WG Fin E, ﬂ. and

�~33:.
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

1957

Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic
Therapies. J. Hillside Hos ital, 6: 197-206. Fink, M.
11. Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral Response
in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Pszchiat..- 78: 516-525. Fink, M. and
10.

A

w

Itajin, ROE.

12. Significance of Individual Variability in the

to Electroshock. J. Hillside

Green, M.A.

13.

EEG

An

and

Response
Hospital, 6: 229-2h0.
EEG

Clinical Response to

Megimide. EEG. Clin.
Green, M. and Fink, M.

Neurophysiol. 2: 180.
Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric
Interviews. J. Hillside Hospital, 6: 207-215.

J. Jaffe.

Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital. J. Hillside Hos ital, 6: 216-228.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.
16. Perception of Embedded Figures After Induced Altered
Brain Function. Amer. Psychol. 13: 361. Kahn, R.L.
and Fink,

M.

17. Role of Stimulus Intensity in Perception of Simultaneous
Cutaneous Electrical Stimuli. J. Hillside Hospital, 6:
2hl-2SO. Karin, H. and Fink, M.
18. Perception Experiments in a Study of Ambivalence. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. lg: 167-176. Karin, H., Tarachow, S.
and Friedman, S.
1958

with
Electroshock
19. Psychotherapeutic
Techniques
Patients.
"
‘J. Hillside Hospital, 1: 17-25. Esecover, 3.,
JaTTe, 3. and Kahn, R.L.
20.

Lateral

the Sedation
Clin. Neurophysiol. l2: 162-163.

Gaze Nystagmus as an Index of

Threshold.
Fink, Mo

EEG.

�PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

1958

21. Effect of Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on EEG
and Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive
Therapy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. ﬁg:
380.387. Fink, no
22. Effect of Diethazine on EEG and Significance for Theory
of Convulsive Therapy. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. l2:
207-208. Fink, M.

23. Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post-Convuhive
EEG

776

and Behavior.

(abst). Fink,

EEG.

E.

Clin.

&amp;

Neuroph

siol. $2:

Electroencephalographic Correlates of the Electroshock
Process. Dis. Nerv. Sy . $2: 227. Fink, M. and Green,
EXperimental Studies of Convulsive and Drug Therapies in
Theoretical Implications. A.M.A. Arch.
Psychiatry:
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. ﬁg: 733-73h (abet). Fink, M.,
a n, . . an
reen, M.A.
26. Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. Dis.
Nerv. Sys. l2: 113-118. Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and
reen’ 0

M.

27. Comparative Study of Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma
in the Therapy of Psychosis. J. Amer. Med. Assoc., 166:
18h6-1850. Fink, M., Shaw, R., Gross, G. and Coleman,

F.S.

28.

'

Clinical and Electroencephalographic Effects of Megimide
in Patients without Cerebral Disease. Neurology, 8:
‘
682-685.

Green,

M.

and Fink,

M.

Psychiatry, 3;: 2h9-258. Jaffe, J.
30. Communication Networks in Freud's Interview Technique.

29. Language of the Dyad.

Psych. Quart. 2g: hS6-h73. Jaffe, J.
31. Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
and
Ed.
P.
of
Hoch,
Communication,
Psychopathology
Eratton. Kahn, R.Lo and Fink,
u n, ., rune

M.

�-35PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

1959

32. Effect of an Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on
EEG and Behavior: Significance for Theory of
Convulsive Therapy. Biol. Psychiatry ed. Massrnan,

J.,

Grune

&amp;

Stratton,

N.Y. pp. 1

-l9

33. Alteration in Brain Function in Therapy.
N. ed.
Kline
harmacology
Frontiers,
E
Co., Boaton, pp. 325-332. Fink, M.
3h. Significance of

EEG

. Fink,
Psycho-

Eittle,

M.

Brown
‘

Pattern Changes in Psychopharmacology.

Clin. Neurophysiol. g: 398 (abst). Fink, M.
35. Electroencephalographic and Behavioral Effects of
TofrEnil. Canad. Psych. Assoc. J. A: 1665-1718.
Fink, M.
36. Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences
in Behavioral Response to Convulsive Therapy.
JoNoMoDo 128: 2h3‘2h8- Fink, Mo, Kahn, Roll. and
EEG.

PoIIacE, HT"

37. Effects of Diffuse Altered Brain Function on Perception.
Proc. XV . Int. Con . Psychol. Publ. North-Holland,
Amsterdam, pp. 238-239. Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. &amp; Karin, H.
38. Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration of Brain
Function on Behavior. Congress Re orts II Int.
Cong. Psychiatry, I}: E9?-E§3
Kahn, R.L. and Korin, H.

labstS. Fink,

M.,

39. Relationship of Threshold and Duration of Seizures to
Degree of EEG Delta Activity Induced During Electroshock. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. —2: 399 (abst).
Green, M.
ho. Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy. Dis. Nerv. Syg. 32: 180-18h.
Kahn, R.L. and Pollack, H.

In Press

bl.

Effects of Psychopharmacologic
Agents. szchotropic Drugs, 2: Ed. Bradley P. Fink,
b2. Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post-Convulsive
EEG and Behavior of Psychiatric Patients. EEG Clin.
EEG

and Behavioral

Neurophysiol. Fink,

M.

M.

�PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

In Press

(contd)

Interview Patterns. The
D
amics of Psvchiatric Drug There , ed.-3T
arwer-Foner, C.C. nomas, Springfield, Ill.
Fink, M., Jaffe, J. and Kahn, R.L.
hh. Formal Language Patterns as Character Defenses:
Implications for Psychoanalytic Technique. Pszchologz
of Speech and Hearing Disorders, ed. Barbara, D. .,
Grune &amp; Stratton. Jeffe, 3.

h3-

Drug Induced Changes in

Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in
a Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis. A.M.A.
Arch. Gen. Pszchiat. Kahn, R.L., Pollack, H.
an

h6.

n,

o

Set in the Perception of Simultaneous
Tactile Stimuli. Am. Jour. Psychol.Korin, H. and
Fink, M.

The Role of

�3.

Presentations.
1.

Relationship Between Altered Brain Function and Denial
in Electroshock Therapy. American Psychiatric
Association, Atlantic City.
Delusional Reduplication of Parts of the Body after
Insulin Coma Therapy. New York Neurological Society,
and the New York Society for Clinical Psychiatry,
New

York.

Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to Improvement
in Electroshock. Electroshock Research Association,
Atlantic City.
h. Quantitative Study of Slow Wave Activity Following Electroshock. Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers,
Bethesda.
Newer Drugs in Psychiatry. Nassau Neuropsychiatric
Society, Long Island.
3.

1956

Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
American Psychopathological Association, New York.

Electroencephalographic and Clinical Effects of Megimide.
Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers,
New

York.

1957

8.

Perception Experiments in a Study of Ambivalence. Section
of Neurology and Psychiatry of the New York Academy
of Medicine and the New York Neurological Society,
New

York.

Individual Differences in EEG Responsivity. Metropolitan
EEG Society, New York.
10. Criteria in Evaluation of Clinical Behavioral Change.
Round Table Discussion, American Psychiatric
Association, Chicago.
11. Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy. Electroshock Research.Association, Chicago.

�938PRESENTATIONS

1957

12.

EXperimental Studies of the Electroshock Process.
Society of Biological Psychiatry, Atlantic City.

Effects of Diffuse Altered Brain Function on Perception.
XV International Congress of Psychology, Brussels.
Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration in Brain
Function in Behavior. International Congress of
Psychiatry, Zurich.
The Relation of Ambivalence to Aggression and Authority
in Psychoneurotic Patients. American Psychological
Association, New York.
16. Perception of Embedded Figures After Induced Altered
Brain Function. American Psychological Association,
New

13.

York.

17.

Behavioral Patterns in Induced States of Altered Brain
Function. New York Divisional Meeting, American

Psychiatric Association,

New

York.

Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric
Interviews. New York Divisional Meeting, American
Psychiatric Association, New York.
Significance of EEG Frequency Shift for Psychiatry.
Metropolitan EEG Society, New York.
Effect of Diethazine on EEG and Significance for Theory
of Process of Convulsive Therapy. Eastern
Association of Electroencephalographers, New York.

An

1958

Correlates of the Electroshock Process. Eastern
Psychiatric Research Association, New York.
22. Significance of Individual Variability in EEG Changes
During Electroshock Therapy. Eastern Association
of Electroencephalographers, Montreal.
23. Experimental Studies of Convulsive and Drug Therapies
in Psychiatry: Theoretical Implications. New York
Neurological Society and the New York Society of
Clinical Psychiatry, New York.

21.

EEG

�-39.
PRESENTATIONS

1958

Patterns with Altered Brain Function.
Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
The Relation of F Score to Behavioral and Psychological
Response with Altered Brain Function. Eastern
Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
26. Intensity of Stimulation and Perception of Simultaneous
Stimuli in Cerebral Dysfunction. Eastern Psychological
Association, Philadelphia.
Communication

27.
28.

29.
30.

31.
32.
33.

3h.
35.

SociOoPsychological Aspects of Diagnosis and Treatment:
Theoretical Implications (Symposium). Eastern
Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
Drug Induced Changes in Interview Patterns. Conference
on Psychodynamic, Psychoanalytic, and Sociologic
Aspects of the Neuroleptic (Tranquilizing) Drugs
in Psychiatry, Montreal.

Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differences
in Behavioral Response to Convulsive Therapy.
American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco.
Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital. American Psychiatric Association,
San Francisco.
A Critique of "Pre-Conscious" Perception and the "Poetzl
Phenomenon". American Psychiatric Association,
San Francisco.
Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical Response
to Convulsive Therapy. Electroshock Research
Association, San Francisco.
Effects of Anticholinergic Agent, Diethazine, on EEG and
Behavior: Significance for Theory of Convulsive
Therapy. Society of Biological Psychiatry, San
Francisco.
Role of EEG Frequency Shift in Behavioral Effects of
Drugs. Section of Neurology and Psychiatry, Queens
County Medical Society, New York.
Effect of Anticholinergic Compounds on Post Convulsive
EEG and Behavior. American EEG Society, Atlantic
City.

�shoPRESENTATIONS

1958

Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy. Eastern Psychiatric Research
Association, New York.
37. EEG and Behavioral Effects of Psychopharmacologic Agents.
Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psycho Pharmacologicum,
Rome; and Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, New York.
Relationship between Seizure Threshold and Duration of
Seizures to EEG Change During Electroshock. Eastern
Association of Electroencephalographers, New York.
1959

Effects of Tofranil. International
Conference on Depression and Allied States, Montreal.
Sociopsychologic Factors Affecting Therapist-Patient
Relationships. American Academy of Psychoanalysis,
Philadelphia.
Effect of Induced Cerebral Dysfunction in Man and on
Tachistoscopic Perception of Embedded Color Figures.
Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City.
Behavioral Changes with Different Methods of Induced
Cerebral Dysfunction. Eastern Psychological
Association, Atlantic City.
h3. Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment.
Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City.
hh. Language Patterns as Measures of Behavioral and Neurophysiologic Change. American Psychiatric
Association, Philadelphia.
EEG

and Behavioral

�C.

Reports in preparation:

1.
2.
3.

Experimental Studies of Convulsive Therapy - a
monographic review.
EEG Patterns and Synaptic Events in Experimental
Hallucinogenic States.
Comparative Study of Indoklon and Electrically
Induced Convulsive Therapies.
Studies of the Sedation Threshold.
Effect of Induced Cerebral Trauma in Man on the
Tachistoscopic Perception of Embedded Colored

Figures.
Individual Differences in the Perception of the
Upright in Hospitalized Psychiatric Patients.
Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive
Therapy.

Sociopsychologic Factors in Drug Therapy.
Modification of Psychotherapeutic and Supervisory
Relationships by Altered Brain Function.

�’os.

Relation Between Altered Brain Function and Denial in Electroshock Therapy
Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D.
Max

Fink, M.D.

Edwin A.

Read
,

at the

Weinstein,

M.D.

Annual Meeting American Psychiatric Association, May 1955.

the Research Service of the Hillside Hospital, and the Department of
Neurology of the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.
From

This investigation was supported in part by the Medical Research and Development Board, office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army under
Contract No. DA-h9-OO7 MD-3763 and grant M-927 from the National Institute
of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service.

�Although many

theories concerning the

mode

of action of electroshock

and
psycholphysiological
among
the
relationships
been
have
offered,
therapy
(3,h,5,6)
studies
In
previous
understood
(1,2).
remain
poor v
ogical factors

certain
function,
that
was
suggested
of
brain
it
of patients with alterations
of
effects
the
to
therapeutic
related
of the observed patterns of behavior were
electroshock.

dis(3,6),
anosognosia
of
or
illness
denial
included
patterns
in
and
language,
(8)
changes
time
and
(7),
reduplication
orientation for place
that
indicated
was
It
(9).
paraphasia
misnaming
or
particularly nonaphasic
These

than
rather
of
illness
the
stress
to
these phenomena were fonns of adaptation
neural
of
milieu
the
In
judgment.
Specific defects in memonv, perception or
motivations
his
the
expresses
damage,
patient
brain
reorganization provided by
the
with
modes
of
interaction
changed
of
in new s,rmbolic patterns indicative
of
forms
insuch
denies
the
delusion
patient
In
anosoynosic
the
environment.
of
an
the
and
operation,
fact
blindness,
of
a
limb,
loss
capacity as hemiplegia,
as well as other problems in livinﬁ.

In disorientation for place, the way in

the
symbolic
as
serves
hospital
which the patieit
be
need
to
the
often
traumatic
situation,
representation of some aspect of the
the
locates
or
of
familiar
place
a
name
the
he
uses
well and go home. Thus,
misnames and mislocates the

the
outside
hospital.
a
confabulates
journey
his
to
or
close
hospital
academy"
skating
"roller
a
as
the
to
hospital
'When a paraplegic patient refers
names
Mount
the
(Mount
Cyanide,
Sinai)
hos
the
ital
or a paranoid patient calls
home

symbolize the patient's feelings in dramatic fashion.

In paraphasia, the ob-

a
to
personal
related
usually
are
patient
jects
the
Thus,
patient
and
of
hospitalization.
illness
that
problem, particularly
and
and
objects
the
of
places
body,
selects aspects of the environment, parts

which are misnamed by the

in
of
his
a
feelings
the
exnression
for
them
language
his
in
uses
n

interaction.

new mode

of

�.3.
could be brought out by the administration of amytal sodium ("positive amytal

test").

'With a

return of the complaints of pain these changes in behavior

were no longer apparent

either clinically or under amytal. This

sequence of

events were repeated during two Subsequent courses of electroshock. While this

report supported the hypothesis regarding the therapeutic action of electro-

test" in investigating the probdid not represent the usual condition for

shock and showed the usefulness of the "amytal
lem,

it

concerned only one case and

is given.
The theory is further tested in the present study in which a group of
potients receiving electroshock for mental illness were given repeated amytal
tests before, during and after the course of treatment. The purpose of the
study was to determine the relationship between the clinical response to the

which electroshock

treatment and changes in behavior produced by the drug.

theses tested were that those patients
more

likely to

show: (1) evidence

The

particular hypo-

improved with electroshock would be

who

of brain dysfunction

on

the amytal

test

and

(2) behavior patterns indicative of denial.
METHGD

series of amytal tests. In this test, the patient is asked a standard group of questions pertaining to orientation and the
patient

Each

awareness of

was given a

illness.

The drug

ution at a rate of .05 grams (1

is then administered intravenously in a
cc) per minute until nystagmus, slurred

drowsiness and errors in counting backward are noted.
now

repeated.

The

The same

5%

sol-

speech,

questions are

following changes, when persistent, are called "positive" and

are deemed indicative of cerebral dysfunction.

1. Complete denial of illness.

2. Denial of major aspects of illness, such as attributing entry into
hospital to a trivial or past illness.
3. Misnaming the hospital, either
euphemism as

"rest

home."

its

proper name, or in terms of a

�ah. Displacement of the location of the hospital, such as to another city.
5. Confabulated journeyt
6.

Reduplication of the hospital, as stating that he is in another hos~
pital of the same or similar name.

7. Disorientation for time of day with confusion of day and night.

misidentification of the examiner such as calling
or an "entertainer".

8._ Gross

him a "lawyer"

9. Disorientation for year.
The

patient

was given

his

first test prior

to treatment, and re-tested

at weekly intervals. All patients in the series had negative amytal tests prior
to the initiation of therapy. Treatments were administered three times a week,
so that the patients were generally tested after every third treatment.

A

test

after a treatment. Testing was continued after the
termination of therapy until the result had become negative.
of
and
records
standard
tests
memory and learnElectroencephalographic
ing ability were also given, but will not be considered in detail in this paper,

was always given two days

POPULATION

Twentyufour patients

at Hillside Hospital receiving electroshock with the

Reiter Electrostimulator were studied. There
authors.

The

patients

were taken on the

was no

basis of consecutive referrals, and

the determination of the necessity for treatment was
Some

patients

were

selection of cases by the
made by

the clinical

necessarily excluded because their treatment

staff.

was terminated

or interrupted before they were adequateLy studied. Another was omitted because he had manifestations of brain disease and a positive amytal

to electroconvulsive therapy.

thirtyvthree. Patients
treatments.

Some

The number

who showed

test prior

of treatments varied from nine to

clinical

improvement tended

to receive fewer

of this variability could also be ascribed to differences in

the inclination of the resident psychiatrists to use this form of treatment.

�~5One

patient decided for himself that

he had enough treatment and eloped.

gnostically, the patients consisted of

1h with depressive

schizophrenia and one manic reaction. There were 15
and the ages ranged from 2h

series,

to

68

reactions,

women and 9 men

9

Dia-

with

in the

with a median of h7.

of response to E.S.T.
Evaluation.Wa—
M~~
All the patients were observed for at least eight weeks after completion
of treatment.
on

Determination of the patient's response to electroshock was made

staff opinion, the

the basis of the resident psychiatrist‘s impression,

nurses' notes and the clinical evaluation of one of us (M.F.)

who

supervised the

treatments but was not aware of the amytaltest results. In this way the pat-

ients

were

classified into three groups.

gﬁwwyarkedlv Improved; The 11 cases

in this group

were regarded as show-

ing recovery or marked improvement. These patients no longer showed the
ptoms which brought them

symp

into the hospital; their doctors felt they were better;

and the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects as being

able to sleep without

medication, better appetite, and improved capacity to get along with the other

patients and participate in hospital activities.
B.

Moderatelv Improvegz_

The

six patients in this group

showed some

improvement but continued to manifest

indications of mental illness. These

patients typically

relief, i;§:, acute depressive features

showed symptomatic

might be gone, but the dramatic change so evident in the

apparent. Each patient continued to

show some

first

group was not

noticeable disturbance such as

obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation,
C. Minimally or Unimnroved. In this group were placed seven patients

in

whom

change was not

ient improvement.
somewhat improved.

clearly noticable or

Some showed

But

who showed

only equivocal or trans-

fluctuations in behavior, at times appearing

the change was not sustained, so that by the end of

�9-6-

much
did
before.
as
they
appeared
treatment, they

are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement. Others might
In
by
these
any
case,
of
in
patients.
change
estimates
the
have differed in
and
the
between
first
the
differences
using this threefold classification,
We

third groups will

be

distincto
OBSERVATIONS

l.

ﬂggjggL

Test Results

of
The
number
tests
given
amytal
Reactions.
of
A. Distribution
Positive -um-W
from
to
three
thirteen,
ranged
electroshock
of
the
course
each
during
to
patient
shown
the
data
Table
is
In
maintained.
I,
depending on how long treatment was
.

for

the number of

and
number
and
percent posthe
treatment
tests given during

The
improved
patients
markedly
each
in
the
group.
patients
itive for all
moderthe
with
unimproved
the
group,
showed many more positive reactions than

between these groups.

Every markedly improved

ately improved patients in
On
other
the
treatment.
reaction
during
ient had at least one positive amytal
cases
unimproved
of
the
and
five
hand, one of the moderately improved patients
the
of
incaach
A
the
results
of
comparison
showed
result.
a
positive
never
the
than
better
at
significant
groups, using chi-square, is statistically
level of confidence.
TABLE I

pat—_

1%

WWW

DISTRIBUTION OF POSITIVE ANITAL TESTS DURING TREATMENT

”

No. of

tests given

durinc treatment

Markedly improved

(ll)

Moderately improved (6)
Unimproved (7)

Number

positive

%

Positive

50

38

76%

39

15

38%

hS

6

13%

the
In
groups
of
Fig.
treatment.
each
l
stase
at
B. Positive reactions
who
had
positive
each
in
of
group
the
patients
percentage
for
are compared
»

�treatment.
of
each
stage
at
results
after
reactions
had
positive
Almost half the markedly improved patients
nine
to
seven
after
reactions
had
positive
and.all
treatments,
three
only
treatments.

In the unimproved cases, on

of
number
positive
the
hand,
other
the

of
the
course
during
increase
consistent
no
was
and
there
small
reactions was
other
the
between
to
tends
fall
improved
group
moderately
the
Again,
treatment.
two.
Although some

than
more
received
patients

15

treatments the data is not

small
too
became
each
number
in
group
the
because
presented beyond this point
than
more
received
unimproved
patients
of
the
Four
of
comparison.
for purposes
mode
One
the
of
with consistently negative amytal test results.
20

treatments

occasionally
an
with
only
treatments
30
received
over
improved
patients
erately

positive reaction.
There were

variations in the per-

reactions.
positive
a .e-u'
two
consecleast
at
Using
week.
week
to
from
sistence of positive reactions
improved,
markedly
the
of
nine
of
persistence,
criterion
the
as
utive positives
showed
perunimproved
group
the
of
one
and
only
two of the moderately improved
C. Duration_3§
“-5

one
but
patients
treatment
all
of
termination
the
,After
sistent positives.
The
reconvulsion..
the
last
after
nine
days
had negative amytal reactions

treatment.
week
after
second
the
by
test
negative
a
developed
maining patient
improved
group
markedly
the
in
D. Factor of awe. Since the patients
conceivis
reactions,
it
from
depressive
suffering
be
older
tended to
persons
to
age
be
scley
related
might
results
test
able that the difference in amytal
assum—
the
is
this
Underlying
improvement.
clinical
to
coincidentally
and only
funbrain
altered
show
of
signs
to
more
s
likely
i
older
the
person
that
ption
|
shown.
each
is
2
for
group
mean
the
Table
age
In
electroshock.
when
given
ction

�-8.
TABLE 2

RELATIONSHIP OF CLIEICAL_IMPROVEMENT TO AGE

Than Age

Markedly Improved

(ll)

h7.6h

0'

Moderately Improved (6)

50.00

Unimproved (7)

35-29

It is apparent that the first
patients.

two groups were

older than the unimproved

Yet, while the mean age of the moderately improved cases

higher than the markedly improved group, theSe patients

still

show

is slightly
significantly

fewer positive reactions.

In Table

3

the

number of

positive reactions during treatment is

shown

of
he
over
to
age.
limited
years
patients
the
analysis is
for
In this table the relationship of positive reactions in the different groups
remains unchanged from that when the groups are considered as a whole.
each group when

TABLE 3
OVER hO
PATIENTS
IN
AMITAL'TESTS
DISTRIBUTION OF.EQ§EE;VE
a...

No. of

tests given

durine treatment_

Number

positive

%

fpsitizg

Markcdly Improved (1m)

h6

35

76

Mederately Improved (5)

3h

15

hS

Unimproved (3)

17

O

O

2. Other Aspects of Behavior.
were
there
and
disorientation
of
denial
illness
explicit
and
the
of
drug
influence
the
under
both
occurred
changes in behavior that
fashion
progressive
treatment
is
of
significantly
the
course
clinically during

Apart from

in those patients

who

improved.

These aspects may be divided

into verbal and

non-verbal communication.
A.
can:

Channes

in Verbal Language.

These consisted of

denial expressed in

�-99..

evasion and in the use of a syntactical pattern involving the third and second
When

person.

asked about

their

symptoms

patients

gave such answers as

"it's

hard to say" or “I forgot" or "I don't know; I‘ve been waiting for the doctors

tell
as "it's

to

me."

The change

what they

in syntactical person is illustrated by such remarks

call a depression," "I‘m afraid

answering the question "what

trouble."

Sometimes

In patients

patients

is

talk of a relative

would

there

One

to the start of treatment what

will get hurt" or

your main trouble" with "what

who improved

in the non-drug interviews.

somebody

was a

who was

is

3223 main

sick.

notable development of such patterns

patient, for example, whenzisked prior
his main trouble, said "I'm depressed."

such

was

After two treatments he answered the question with "I don't get along well
with

my

mother-in-law." After five treatments he said "I don't get what you

he
said
know."
After
ten
I
that‘s
"I
all
sick;
get
after eight,
what
11
"in
and
said
way
after
don't
my
see
wife,"
"right now, it‘s that I
do you mean" and "I don't know how to explain it." At the termination of
given
home"
an
followed
by
"I
to
want
main
get
was
as
trouble
his
tr atment,

mean," and

account of

how "good"

his wife was.

of
these
group,
increased
the
use
the
other
hand,
on
In the unimproved
language patterns did not occur. They were not present in some, minimally or

inconsistently noted in others.

In

some

of the unimproved patients there was

than
the
of
drug
the
under
effects
of
these
language
patterns
actually less use

there had been in the pre-amytal interview.
..B.

clinical
in

Changes

in

Non-Verbal Behavior.

and drug interviews most frequently

the moderately improved and

improved.

Euphoric reactions occurred both in

in the markedly improved, less

least in the group

which were considered un-

In the unimproved patient classed as manic, euphoric behavior was

present in his clinical behavior and was not changed by amytal.

�-10—‘

of
of
four
interviews
the
amytal
in
apneared
Changes in sexual behavior
other
the
of
each
in
one
in
only
but
patient
the markedly improved patients
makthe
examiner,
caress
hug
to
form
of
or
This took the
trying

categories.

ing remarks with sexual content or engaging in masturbatory

ient in the

unimproved group showed

activity.

this behavior both during are-drug

A

pat-

inter—

views and under the influence of amytal.

Withdrawal or "selective inattention" was shown by nine of the eleven
the
amytal
of
the
phase
drug
during
markedly improved patients particularly

about
the
questions
answer
to
of
failure
consisted
interview. This behavior
fashion.
and
cryptic
in
dysarthric
responding
and
hospitalization or
illness

the
other
each
of
groups.
in
once
occurred
only
the
drug
under
This reaction
who
appeared
the
category
unimproved
two
in
of
that
patients
It was interest
withdrawn before the

test

became more

responsive under the influence of the

drug.

ravage:

there
is
that
indicate
these
in
patients
tests
the
of
anwial
results
damage
or
brain
of
and
the
production
improvement
between
clinical
a relation
method
of
determined
this
by
particular
an altered state of brain function as
The

examination.

In patients

who improve,

the amytal test becomes consistently

treatment.
of
the
course
in
early
positive

In moderately improved or unimproved

does
not
increase
and
frequency
their
reactions
patients there are fewer positive
such
function
brain
methods
of
evaluating
with more treatments. With other
the
in
showed
abnormalities
All
not
patients
present.
close correlation was

found
frequently
as
was
and
*
learning
impaired
record
electroencephalographic
damage
The
brain
of
effects
who
did
not.
those
who
improved as in
in patients

are not unitary and

different

methods of study show varying

results.

more
analyzed_in
being
are
these
data
in
patients
a The electroencephalographic
the
show
that
The
findings
preliminary
be reported elsewhere.
detail, and.will
amytal
the
to
comparable
EEG
improvement,
to
related
abnormality is
Wegree of

test findings.

�.11 -

in
to
changes
function
brain
of
altered
In relating the various aspects
behavior after electroshock therapy

defects in the formation of
In the

of language.

first

symbol

it

has been helpful to distinguish between

patterns

and defects

in the adaptive uses

category one may include such

clinical

phenomena as

loss.
of
memory
and
certain
types
acalculia
aphasia, apraxia, finger agnosia,
cannot
select
he
but
wants
he
"know"
to
what
say
In aphasia, the patient may
and
movements
and
sounds
of
the appropriate elements from the entire category
of
elements
excannot
select
the
defects
With
patient
memory
integrate them.
them
temporal
pata
in
and
units
arrange
significant
perience, class
solving
of
problem
manifested
in
tests
commonly
also
tern. Such defects are
fre—
Such
are
patients
scale.
and in certain subtests of the Wechsler-Bellevue

them into

quently concerned with their

and
of
marked
anxiety
degrees
and
exhibit
defects

frustration.
Adaptive changes in

language, on

the other hand, relate to interaction

They
behavior.
of
motivational
aspects
the
with the environment and concern
The
besame
and
disorientation.
denial
of
are exemplified in the phenomena
and
other
in
defect
a
conditions
as
havioral element may appear under certain

cases as a

part of

an

be
may
example,
for
form of adaptation. Left~ri9ht disorientation,
impaired
and
is
of
right
which
the
left
concept
aphasic defect in

a
paralyzed
able
to
identify
seem
not
may
Other
however,
patients,
or lost.
or
and
ear
left
arm
their
(non-paralyzed)
Show
right
their
left arm, but can
relate
not
does
and
as
long
as
it
of
right
knowledge
left
similarly indicate a

the
not
in
electroshock
of
prois
action
therapeutic
to their illness.
milieu
neural
the
in
providing
rather
but
formation
duction of defects in symbol
The

in

which

altered forms of adaptation

may be

maintained.

outcome of

electroshock treatment by the

psychiatrists predict the
Other
point
treatments.
the
initial
amount of "confusion" that occurs after
The
test
amytal
Leprovement.
to
not
related
was
"confusion"
where
to cases
Many

�-12..
should be useful as a prognostic guide by defining the nature of these changes.

In

cases "confusion"

some

patients the amytal test

mainly a matter of memory defect and in these

may be

negative. On the other hand, some patients imp
such
Clinical
In
of
evidenae
few
without
treatments
"confusion."
a
after
prove
instances the amytal procedure may show an alteration in brain function. In
may be

this study almost half of the markedly

improved

patients had positive reactions

In another case, treated privately by one of us (E.A.W.),

within three treatments.

after only two
result prior to treat-

marked improvement of a severe depressed condition was noted

convulsions.

Yet

this patient,

who had

a negative amytal

ment, showed a markedly positive reaction one day
These

results

do

not

than patients

brain

damage

ectly

measure brain damage, but

rem

that

mean
who do

improved

not improve.

rather

after the second treatment.

patients

have a

The amytal

one deduces

test

greater degree of
does not

dir-

the presence of braincianage

the nature of the adaptive changes in communication. Thus patients with

brain

damaje who do not show such changes are considered to show a negative

re-

im~
methods
of
behavioral
demonstrating
other
that
sult. It is for this reason
paired brain function may not distinguish between improved and unimproved patpositive
do
and
not
others
amytal
a
Why
some
develop
test,
patients
ients.

despite

many more

convulsions

is unclear, but

factors and to the patient's habitual

mode

may be

related to personality

of adaptation to stress.

It is

be
so
function
brain
of
altered
state
treated
a
that
nevertheless,
necessary,
that these forms of adaptation or denial can be maintained. It is for these
which
electroshock
methods
of
administering
believed
that
reasons that it is
be
not
seizures
will
generally
unilateral
as
function
brain
minimally
alter

efficacious. Also

it

affords

some

explanation as to

why

electroshock often

has a beneficial short term effect while evaluation of long ternleffects

little

difference between treated and untreated cases.

show

�-13In considering what constitutes "improvement," it is likely that such
evaluations are dependent in considerable degree on the types of verbal and

patient denies that
imp
he
rated
and
is
and
uncomplaining,
affable
he has any problems,
appears
he
has
developed
he
that
has
or
does
mean
not
acquired
insight
that
It
proved.
non-verbal adaptation that the patient uses.

a more

realistic understanding

Thus, when a

of his interpersonal relations.

exemplified by the patient previously cited

who

said he

This

is well

was "depressed"

in

third person when asked about his illness. While his behavior is rated as improved, actual analysis of his language shows that he is using different forms of symbolic

the pre-treatment interview, but

later

used evasion and use of the

adaptation.
Recent
mechanisms of

studies have supported the findings concerning the development of
denial in the improved patients. Carter (12) confirmed Janis’

(13) findings of consistent evidence of circumscribed amnesias in patients
lowing electroshock.

He

that general memory impairment did not occur,
"selectivity" in forgetting of unpleasant material

concluded

but rather, that there was a
from the

fol-

patient's past life.

Komgold (11;) likewise reports

selective and

"mechanisms
of
observes
(15)
Teicher
similarly,
sensitized
forgetting.
highly

repression" for "emotional" stimuli after electroshock.
Another aSpect of the difference between the improved and unimproved
groups which may bear a

relation to the therapeutic

proved patients there were more changes in

all

not only in verbal patterns. Thus, a patient

mechanism was

that in in,

types of symbolic adaptation,
who

appeared withdrawn both in

the pre-drug and drug interviews had a poorer prognosis than the patient
became withdrawn only under the
who showed

who

effects of the drug, Similarly, the patient

altered sexual behavior under the effects of the drug had exhibited

this behavior during the prenamytal questioning as well, and did not improve
with treatment, while the four patients manifesting sexual behavior only under

�ﬁll!"

the effects of the drug, did improve.

The importance of

the change in symbolic

pattern is also illustrated by the fact that the unimproved manic patient showed
no changes in this aspect of his behavior during the amytal test. It is thus
likely that the facility of changing symbolic patterns in a situation of added

stress is

an important one

in determining response in all somatic therapies.

�SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

ment

treatelectroshock
for
consecutively
referred
(l) Twenty-four patients
the
during
intervals
and
at
regular
during
were given amytal tests before,

courSe of treatment.

(2)

There proved to be a close relationship between the shorteterm

tests.

of
the
anwtal
results
treatment
and.the
to
sponse

patients

showed

early, persistent

re-

The much improved

positive reactions during
patients showed no positive reactions or

and increasingly

the course of treatment. Unimproved

intermediate group

who showed

infrequently and inconsistently.
unimproved
the
than
reactions
showed
more
positive
moderate clinical improvement
of
reincidence
positive
the
much
in
improved
the
of
short
group but fell far
An

showed them

actions.
(3) Changes in

behavior
forms
of
non-verbal
and
language

were most consistent and pronounced

related to denial

in the improved group, even in interviews

not employing drugs.
(h)

The

improvement
clinical
that
the
hypothesis
support
observations

function
in
of
altered.brain
milieu
of
a
in electroshockzmequires the creation
mainbe
may
of
those
denial,
Which new patterns of adaptation, particularly

tained.

�mmmmggzg

1.) Gordon,

Fifty

H. L. :

2.) Kalinowsky, L.

Shock Therapy Theories, Mil. Surg. $92: 397, l9h8.

B. and Hoch, P. H.

Shock Treatment, PBychosurgery and

:

Other Somatic Treatment in Psychiatry, (2nd ed.)

3.) ’Neinstein E.
&amp;

1..)

Psggrchiat.

A. and Kahn, R. L.
_6}_1_:

Syndrome

:

Ybrk, 1952.

of Anosocnosia, Arch. Neurol.

772-791, 1950.

'E‘Jcinstein, E. A., Kann, R. L., Sugannan, L. A., and Linn, L.
Use

of Amobarbital Sodium in Organic Brain Disease,

889-8911.,

Am.

:

Diagnostic

J. Psych., llg:

1953.

S.) weinstein, E. A., Kahn,

L., and Malitz, S.

R.

Its

the "Amytal Test" for Brain Disease:
A. M. A. Arch of

6)

New

weinstein, E.

Serial Administration of

:

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value,

“enrol. and Psychiatu 11: 217-226,

A. and Kahn, R. L. :

1951..

Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiol-

ogical Aspects, Springfield, 111., Charles C. Thomas, in press.
7.) Weinstein, E.

A. and Kahn, R. L.

Brain Disease, J. Neuropath.

8.)

&amp;

:

Patterns of Disorientation in Organic

Clin. Neurol.

l;

21h-226, 1951.

and
R.
A.
L.
E.
L.
A.:
Kahn,
Sugarman,
weinstein,
,
A. M. A. Arch. Neurol.

uplication,

9,) 'weinstein, E.
0rg-tanic Brain

Psychiat.

M. A.

Arch. Neurol.

10.) weinstein, E. A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R. L.:

Its Relation to the

Therapy:

{31:

808-8111, 1952.

L.: Non-aphasic Misnaming (paraphasia) in

A. and Kahn R.

Disease, A.

&amp;

Phenomenon of Red-

&amp;

Psychiat.,‘éz: 72-79,l952.

Psychosis during ﬁlectroshock

Theory of Shock Therapy,

Am.

J. Psych.,

$925

22-26, 1952.

11.)

Mcinstein, E. A. and Kahn,
A. M. A. Arch. Neurol.

ness,
12.) Carter J. T.:

Type

convulsive Therapy,

13.)

Janis,

I.

L.

:

R.
&amp;

L.: Personality Factors in Denial of
Psychiat.

Ill-

Q2; 355-367, 1953.

of Personal Life Hemories Forgotten Following ElectroAm.

Psychologist §; 330, 1953.

Psychologic Effects of Electric convulsive Treatments

Post-treatment Amnesias.) J. Nerv.

&amp;

Ment. Dis.

ill;

359, 1950.

(I.

�REFERENCESz

1h.) Korngold, M.:

An

Shock Treatment,

15.) Teicher, A.:

Investigation of

Am.

The

continued

Psychologist

Q;

Some

Psychological Effects of Electric

381-382, 1953.

Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy

actions of Schizophrenic patients,

Am.

on

the Visual Re-

Psychologist, g, hhS, 1953.

�]
ONS

I
REACT.

90

._”

much Improved (11)

'*~

Mod. Improved

‘

80

” Unimproved

(6)

///

(7)

/

t// ‘\\\\\\_

//////////’
“~.

*

AMYTAL

POSITIVE

3o
PERCENTAGE

20

/

/
/
(“”

\

"
,
,/
.

" /

x,”
I
f

10
O

'

h-é

,__.._..7..___.-_....-_,_....__.-..;}..-.__
7-9

10.12

13.15

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

occurring
reactions
test
amytal
of
positive
Fig. I.-—- Percentage
treatment.
of
stages
different
each
at
in
group

�{fw g;

,{1/,m»‘-‘

JUN

26

”12!. :c.

.M

Altered Brain Function Following Electroshock
H—927

Progress Report - February

1

1958 - September 1 1959

Summary:

In the past eighteen months various studies of the

convulsive therapy process were completed, a program for the

investigation of psychopharnacologic agents consistent with the
general hypothesis concerning the node of action of physiodynamic

therapies

was developed.

The

physiologic effects of nany

interrelationship of the neuro-

new compounds

with the psychodynanic,

perceptual, personality and sociologic aspects of patients'
behavior provided the framework for tnse investigations.
following areas of study were explained:

l)

of psychotherapy with physiodynanic therapy;

The

the interrelation
2)

the elucidation

of the synaptic chemical events which are the basis of the

convulsive therapy process by the acute administration or
experimental anticholinergic compounds at various stages of
convulsive therapy;
and behavioral

3)

studies of the acute and clinical

effects of

a

EEG

variety of psychopharnacologic agents;

h) the use or language indices, such as syntactic and dyadic~

1959

�-2-

diversification analyses, as measures of behavioral
neurophysiologic changes with drugs;

and

5) a comparative study

of indoklon and electrically-induced convulsions in psychiatric

therapy;

duration
of
6) sociopsychologic aspects related to

hospitalization, discharge ratings

and diagnosis in a voluntary

mental hospital; 7) the relation of social attitude to the

effects of convulsive therapy;

8) aspects of the

therapist-

patient relationship affecting aha: choice of therapy;

9)

studies of individual differences in the selection of, and
behavioral change with, convulsive therapy by perceptual aethods.
These

studies have supported and expanded the neuro~

physiologic-adapative view or convulsive therapy, and demonstrated

that such

a hypothesis has

applicability to our understanding of

the node of action of psychepharnacologic agents.

�Progress Report:
A;

Psychotherapy and Physiodyganic Therapy.

Previous observations have shown that two types of

patients are referred for electroshock in this hospital.

largest

number are

patients in the older

limited education and are foreign born,

age groups who have
They tend

to

introspective persons, stereotyped in their thinking
language and verbally unconmunicative.
symptoms
The

The

be non-

and

Their predominant

are depression, agitation, withdrawal and sonatisaticn.

second, and smaller, group of patients are younger, native-

born, better educated, and verbally ccnnunicativo with a

capacity for intropection. They characteristically exhibit
thinking disorders and overactive behavior states, with sonatisation
and depression occurring
An

to a lesser extent.

oratory
explanatory study

was

undertaken of four patients, two

for each group described above, for the purpose of determining
1) reasons for

referral for convulsive therapy,

2) whether

the differences in patients required different attitudes in

psychotherapeutic nanagenent with electroshock, and 3) the

�-1...

relation of the psychotherapsutic approach to the patient'e

clinical response to electroshock.

It

was found

that all of the patients studied

were

electroshock because of a failure of connunication
referred for
in the psychotherapeutic relationship. In
a

reflection of the limited verbal

and

cases this was

two

introspective capacity

social
factors. In the
of the patientdue to educational and
other two cases, however,-the inpaired communication

primarily

due

wee

to unmanageable acting out.

Following treatnent, the older, less educated patients
were able to

naintain this improvement with

a

reassuring

and
to
nininication
the
tendencies
denial
toohniqne,-supporting

during
developed
electroshock.

electroshock eeened to

make

In the

better educated patients,

the patients nore’anenable to an

psychotherapy.
torn
of
interpretive

It

or
psychotherapy
was concluded that the relationship

to electroshock varies with the particular_type of communication

pattern

and adaptation shown by the individual

patient. This

�-5.
the
and
been
Journal
written up
published in
material has
or Hillside Hospital, 7: 17-25, 1958.
B;

Biochemical Aspects of the Convulsive Iherapz Process.
The

significance or high voltage

the convulsive therapy process (Roth
and Kahn, 1957) and the

EEG

22.;l!

delta activity in
1951, 1957; Pink

report that this delta activity

was

'blocked hy the adninistration of ahtioholinergic'compounds;

atropine and scopolanine

(Ulett and Johnson, 1957) provided

the basis for these studies.

As

there were attendant unpleasant,

'systenio effects with the administration of these agents,

.reports describing diethasine

as an anticholinergio'conpound'

(Jenknerwith potent neurologic but minimal systemic effects
l956)
Lechner,
studies
19553
to.undertake
led
Lechner,
us
and

sinilar to those of Ulett
(Fink, 1958).

and Johnson neing this'conpound

These observations with diethasine led to the

agents.
of
other
antioholinergic
experimental
investigation

Clinical and electroencephalographic responses to the
intravenous administration of various anticholinergic agents

�-6in psychiatric patients at various stages of convulsive therapy
were

studied. These observations were related to hypothesis

covering the node of action of convulsive therapy and of

hallucinogens.
The

subjects were ninety psychiatric patients referred

for convulsive therapy, ranging in age tron

Ivariety of diagnoses.
since

some

The

total or

18

to 67, with a

107

observations were made,

subjects were studied with

more than one compound.

A

drugs were administered at various stages of the

treatment process.

The

observations were

laboratory using a standard

electrodes. In each
intravenously at

a

trial,

8

made

in the

EEG

channel instrument and needle

the compound under star was adninistered

until

set rate per minute with clinical behavior

or electrographic changes were observed.
The compounds

studied have been diethasine, Win-2299,

benactyaine, JB~318, JB~336, and atropine.

Each

is

a

potent

anticholinergic agent in vitro.

It

was observed

that diethasine,

Win-2299, benactysine,

�-7;
JB-318 or JB-336 administration

therapy were associated with

at various stages-of convulsive
a) desynchronisatien of

rhythms with a blocking of post-convulsive
b)

EEG

delta activity;

alerting, excitatory behavioral response with illusory, de-

lusional

and

hallucinhtory ideation, and c)_systenic effects

‘drynessof muscular veakness, degrees of the mouth, dry skin and tachycardia.
.

The

electrographic. behavioral and systemic effects were concurrent.
These observations are regarded as

consistent with the.

suggestion that the physiologic basis of convulsive therapy

lies in

an increase in

central nervous system cholinergic

activity.
Observations that

LSD,

amphetamine, nescaline and

diphenhydranine- synpathoninetic and antihistaminic agents

also induce

EEG

~

convulsive
of
desynchronisation, blocking
post

delta activity and clinical excitatory activity support the
suggestion that both the behavioral and electrographic patterns
are based on alteration in synaptic activity.

Increased

synaptic activity (cholinergio, synpatholytic effects) is

�-8.
associated with

336

hypersynchronisation, and clinical eedation

and euphoria; while decreased synaptic

synpathominetxic) is associated with

clinical excitatery

activity (anticholinergic,

EEG

and hallucinogenic

desynchronisation and

states.

Discrepant observations with the anticholinergic agents,

atropine, are considered to

be

related to significant differences

in dongs and structural chemistry.
This material was presented
EEG

at

a meeting of

Society in Atlantic City, June 1h, 1958.

the American

�-90.

Acute and Chronic

EEG

and Behavioral

Psychophersscologic Agents.

Iffects of

According to our neurophysiologic~adaptive view of the

clinical
the
convulsive therapy process,
efficacy of repeated
induced convulsions

is dependent

upon the induction of a

persistent alteration in central function, providing

a

nilieu

for changes in the subject's interaction with the exaniner. In
our studies the best index of neurophysiologic change has been

those aspects of cerebral function reflected by delta activity
in the electroencephalogram (Pink and Kahn, 1957).
The

efficacy of newer psychopharnaceuticals in altering

psychotic behavior patterns has led to the suggestion of a

similar hypothesis for the node of action of these agents, and
to studies of the relationship and specificity of altered

behavioral patterns to neurophysiologic change as reflected in
electroencephalography.
Of

the psychopharnaceuticals tested in acute experiments

an

in increase in synchrony with or without

activity has

an

increase in slow

been observed for chlorpronazine, pronazine and

triflupronasine.

Behaviorslly, these drugs were associated

wave

�-10with

a) increasing sedation, drowsiness, denial and eqhoria;

b) decreasing

agitation, panic, excitement

hallucinatory activity;
of synptons.

and

and delusional and

c) minimization and displacement

Barbituratee regularly induced an increase in

fast activity with

an increase in synchrony, with the

associated

behavioral changes of sedation, euphoria, denial and minimization.
Amphetamine and methamphetamine

increased fast activity without

increased synchrony; behaviorally they resulted in behavioral

alerting, hypcnania, excitement

activity.

and increased motor

Decrease in voltage and per cent time of slow wave

subjects with pcst~convulsive delta activity

activity in

was seen with

Lsnazs, benactysine, Win~2299, JB-BlB, JB-336 and diethasine.
Of

these drugs, benactysine produced increased alerting, excitenent,

tension and panic; the other drugs also produced illusory sensations
and

hallucinatory, delusional
The

and paranoid

ideation.

electrographic patterns were consistenthﬁltered

concurrently with behavioral changes both in the acute and
chronic administration studies.

Tranquilization, euphoria,

�.11sedation and minimisation of symptoms were conversely associated
with increased

EEG

the delta range.
and

hallucinations

synchronisation and shift of frequencies to

Agitation, tension, panic, excitement, illusions
were

associated with desynchronisation of

frequencies.
Similar patterns were demonstrated in subjects with prior

delta activity. Agents that tended to synchronize frequencies,
as chlorpronasine and

delta activity

barbiturates,

and enhanced

augmented the per cent

clinical pattern; agents that

chronised frequencies, as diethasine,
minimised the

LSD-25 and

tine
desyno

benactysine,

clinical effects typically ascribed to repeated.

convulsions.
Following these preliminary observations more intensive

undertaken.
was
of
an
(Totranil),
agent, inipranine
investigation
In

28

can3:§::::
acute experiments,
patients referred for physio-

dynamic

therapies

were

stages of treatment.

tested in the

EEG

laboratory at various

Tofranil solution (10 ng/cc)

was

adninistered

intravenously at a set rate(l'cc/h0 sec) until electroencephalographic

�total of

or behavioral changes became prominent, for a
mg

(.05«2.5 ng/kg).

hO-125

Behavioral observation and electrographic

recording continued for one to three hours.

A

second group of

ve, withdrawn
16 patients nanifesting depressienl or retarded bdnvior and
were

whp

referred for pharmacotherapy, received daily oral Torranil

of 75-250

mg

for four

weeks or

longer.

In the acute studies there was

initial restlessness,

associated with dissiness, dry mouth, 'faintness," nausea, and
on

tour occasions, vomiting.

These symptoms

10-20 minutes, and were accompanied by

lassitude, heaviness

of the extremities and eventual drowsiness.
unchanged or slowed.

persisted for

Heart rate was

Subsequently, subjects were relaxed,

quiet and disinclined to activity, even

when

returned to their

ward.
The

electrographic pattern accompanying these behavioral

changes were

initiated

the injection.

halved.
such

In {our

By

by a gradual decrease in voltages during

minutes,
the per cent tine alpha had been
ten

patients with noderateonnouniiof beta activity,

activity increased in voltage

and per cent time.

By

twenty

�-13minutes, in association with behavioral lassitude, low voltage
6

to

50

nicrovolts) randon theta frequencies (5-7 cps) appeared.

In six records with poet-convulsive delta
a marked decrease

activity.
two

in voltage and per cent time of slow

patterns persisted for

These electrographic

was

wave
5

to

hours.

variability in the

There was considerable individual

acute
of

activity, there

EEG

response. In patients

totranil,

but three.

who

received 100

mg

or more

angptehavioral changes were observed in all
In six patients, dosage of Tofranil less than 50
EEG

associatedéwith
were
either

EEG

mg

or behavioral changes.

In the chronic Tofranil studies behavioral changes

generally appeared during-the second, and were maximal during
the third, week of treatment.

The most

adaptation was euphoric denial which
They conplained

or displaced

prominent behaioral

noted in eight patients.

was

less of somatic synptois,

their illness

on

inquiry.

It

and

ed

ed

denial. mininisetien

became

increasingly

difficult to discuss significant lire relationships with then.

�'

~1h-

in three patients sonatiaation and restlessness increased and
depressive affect persisted.

In two of these, restlessness,

insomnia and vomiting led to cessation of therapy.
symptoms were noted

change in

in five patients after four weeks of therapy.

Electrographic studies
minimal changes.

No

on

chronic administration shoved

Voltages became lower and record modulation

poorer. Well defined fast activity became more prominent, and

in four subjects, low voltage theta (5-7 cps) activity

noted.

was

Details of these studies were presented at the Collegiun

Internationale Neuro«Psychopharmacologicum,

at the Conference

1958, and

Rone, September 12,

on Depression and

Allied States,

Montreal, March l9~2l, 1959.
D.

Patterns as Measures of Behavioral and

Language

Neurophsziolegic Change with Drugs.

In previous studies of the convulsive therapy process,
was demonstrated

analysis

(

)

that

two language measures,

and dyadic

syntactic content

diversification in interviews

(

)

provided objective indices of behavioral change, and were

related to the degree of altered brain function. In

a

further

it‘

�-15-

test

of language measures as indicea of behavioral and

neurophysiologic change, they were next applied to recordings
or interviews on acute administration of various psychopharnacologic

agents.
At the

present time

72

interviews with patients at

various stages of drug therapy have been analysed, using the
following agents:

anobarbital, benactysine, chibrpronazine,

diethasine, lysergic~acid diethylanide, and Vin-2299.
Following a routine electrographic recording, an

psychiatric

unstructured physiologic interview, with slow periods of

structured inquiry,

was

tape recorded. With

EEG

running, an

intaavenous injection was then given at a slow rate.

specific electrographic or clinical changes
interview was repeated.

When

were induced, the

Recording periods of

EEG

and verbal

behavior were alternated for the duration of the observation

period.
The EEG was

shirts in
(delta

measureg'tor changes in synchronisation,

dominant frequencies, and per cent

and beta

frequencies.

tins of

slow waves

�-16The

rthe

tape recordings were transcribed and measured for

diversification of consecutive

25 word

speech and for syntactical changes.‘

samples of dyadic

In the dyadid analysis,

participants
both
of
behavior
verbal
the pooled
divided into

total

i;g.,

the ratio of the number of different

number of words.
.

.

The

transcribed,

samples, and for each sample a diversification

25 word

score was calculated,
words to the

was

syntactic language

.
analysis

were based on response

to standardised questions using the nothod previously described
(

), scoring such changes as syntactical use of person,

alteration in tense, evasion, qualification, displacement or
verbal denial or symptoms, use of stereotyped expression or

clichzs, cryptic response,

and withdrawal or

silence.

Consistent changes were observed in both the dyadic

diversification

and

syntactic language measures in subjects

classified according to the neurophpiologic

and behavioral

effects of the drugs applied.
Anobarbital and chlorpronasinc are neurophysiologic
synchronising agents; anobmrbital regularly induced high voltage

�-17.
well synchronised

administration

fast activity, at

was followed by

20-2h cps, while chlorpronasine

increased synchronisiation of the

record and a shirt to ﬂower frequencies including occasional

EEG

slow wave

burst activity.

Behaviorally these drugs are associated

with sedation and tranquilisetion,

there

was an

On

the language measures

increase in stereotypy and repetitiveness associated

with increasing use or cliches, alterations in tense, displacement
and evasion.

Diethasine, benactysine,

LSD~25 and Win-2299

of the neurophysiologic deaynchronising.compounds.

characteristically induce decreased voltage
of alpha

activity

and increased

irregular

are examples
These drugs

and per cent

low voltage

tine

fast activity.

Behaviorally they are associated with hallucinatory, excitatory
or

illusory activity.

On

the language neasures they induced

'

decreasing repditiveness, wider diversity o: words, lesevariability
of

diversification scores,

and decreased use or

cliches and

alterations in tense.
neasures
Further exploration of language
are suggested
as a

rational basis for the understanding or the psychologic

�-13-

effects of the

new

therepies.

Details of these studies have been presented at the
Conference on Paychodynenic, Psychoanalytic and Sociologic

Aspects of the Neuroleptic Drugs in Psychiatry, Montreal, April
11—13, 1958, end

Aeeocietion,
American
the
Psychiatric
et

Philadelphia, April 27, 1959.
E.

Coupereble study or Indoklon and Electrica11y~
Induced Convaleiona in Pczchietric Therepz.

A

In our investigation or the-node of action of convulsive

therapy

we

have previouslymnnducted a convulsive-subconvnlsive

control study.

This study demonstrated

that

e

significant

behavioral change occurred almost exclusively in patients

receiving grand nel electroconvulsive therapy.

The

present

report in an assessment of the relative neurophysiological
behavioral and clinical effects of

two

different

methods of

and
convulsions
current)
(alternating
electrical
inducing

inhalent (indcklon).

�Twenty—five consecutive

patients referred for convulsive

therapywere studied. They were randomly divided into two groups,
13

patients receiving grand nal therapy induced

by the standard

while
convulsions were
Medcratt alternating current instrument,
induced in the renaining 12 by the inhalation of hexafluorodiethyl-

ether (indoklon). In both groups treatment
time a week for a
on the

total of

10

to

2h

wee

administered three

applications, determined

basis of clinical criteria by the supervising psychiatrist.
All patients were tested one to two days prior to the

first

treatment, following 10-12 treatnents, and

following the
of

lest treainent.

The

two weeks

tests given included

intellectual functioning (rive subtests

measures

'

from the Wechsler-

perception
(figure—ground
Bellevue Intelligence Scale),

figures,
the perception
discrimination using embedded.geonetric
of peeuoisochronatic color plates

at high speeds of tachistoscopic

exposure, and the Street incomplete figures

test),

and

social

attitude (the Levincon revision of the California I Scale).
An EEG was

given during each of the testing periods.

�-2066
from
continuum
slow
wave
cent
a
tine
activity
the per

second sanple was used as the index of neurophysiologic change.

results failed to

The

test differences

show any

between the electroshock and indcklon groups

at each of the three test periods.
showed

significant intergroup

Intragroup analysis, however,

that during treatment both groups

on

the intellectual and peripheral

on

the

F

scale.

By two weeks

tests,

made

increased errors

and had high scores

after the termination of treatment

both groups returned to near pretreatnent levels for most
Both groups were comparable

slow wave

activity in the

mean

EEG

after

tests.

for the degree of induced
10-12

treatnents.

The

s

user per cent tine delta for the indoklon group

was 51%, and

for the_electroshock group h7.5%. Within each group individual
the
of
behavioral
were
to
related
degree
change
in
differences

physiologic change, those with the highest per cent tine delta
showing the

greatest behavioral change. Bath

between change in

test

activity with treatment

and

correlation

performance and degree of slow wave
were

positive for all procedures, except

the comprehension subtest of the Wechsler-Bellevue)and reached
a

level of statistical significance for Digit

Span (e .61, p

&lt;-.Ol),

�p(

object Assembly (+.h6,

.05),

tachistoscopic perception (+.67,
embedded

figures (*.h3,

p

4&lt;

F

scale (+.38,

p &lt;

p

&lt;

.05),

.01) and perception of

.05).

This study has denonstrated that two very different

convulsant agents

may

produce similar neurophysiologic

behavioral change.

and

It is

concluded that behavioral changes

in convulsive therapy are related to the degree of altered

brain function, and are non-specific for the type of agent
used to induce the convulsion.

Details of this study were presented at the Eastern
Psychological Association in Atlantic City, April, 1959.
Sociopszchological Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment.

F.

In a previous study of the Hillside Hospital population,

it

was shown

tht the factors or age, education, place of birth

and

social attitudes as measured by the California I scale,

were

related to the selection of therapy. ‘Those patients

were

older, had less education, were foreign-born and with high

stereotpy scores

on

the

F

scales were

more

whp

likely to receive

�-22-

convulsive therapy.

'In

contrast, patients

who were

younger,

the
on
low
and
obtained
scores
native-born
educated,

better

as
psychotherapy
received
scale,

their sole

F

form of treatment.

study
the
relation
determine
to
was
Further
undertaken
of
duration
hospitalto
factors
of eociopsychological
1)_th°
2) the

isation,

The

Hospital
171
16

final diagnosis.

3) the

and

inspatient
of
Hillside
population
adult
entire

on March 7, 1957 was

patients.
to

68

57 nan and

llh

studied. This consisted of
from
in
age
ranging
wonen,

median
of
35-years.
with
a
years,

It
period

clinical

discharge,
of
time
evaluations at

was

(1—5

shortest
the
for
hospitalized
that
patients
found

the
least education, were
months) were oldest, had

foreign-born,
the
scores
andlad
highest
been
have
to
most likely
on

the

1

scale. Iounger,native-born,

more

educated, lower

r

'(10
more
or
the
longest
score patients were hospitalised
months).

The sane

hospitalisation

factors
of
of
length
to
these
rdationship

made
were
when
analyses
found
separate
was

�-23according to diagnosis and type of treatnent (convulsive

therapy or psychotherapy).
Discharge evaluations of improvement in the

population studied were

total

related
to age, the
significantly

older patients having the nest favorable ratings. Analysis
of the data by type of treatnent, however, demonstrated that

the convulsive therapy patients ratings of recovered or

among

much improved were
F

given to those patients with the highsst

scores, least education

and who were

foreign-born.

Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psychoneurosis were

associated with lower
and

high

native birth.
F

The

F

scores, younger ages,

more

education

older, less educated, foreign-born,

score patients were more frequently classified as

involutional or nanic-depressive psychosis.

It is

postulated that these relationships reflect the

ingluence of social background on psychological processes,
such as the behavioral

patterns of communication, nodes or

expression and symbolic values.

These not only contribute

to the pattern or mental illness, but affect

all aspects

of

�~2h-

the patient-therapist interaction.

Details of this study have been presented at the
Eastern Psychological Association in Atlantic City, Avril,
'1959, and at the Academy of Psychoanalysis in Philadelphia,

April 26, 1959, and has been accepted for publication in the
Archives of General Psychiatry.

0.

The

Relation of Social Attitude to the Effects

of Convuleive Therapz.
As

F

indicated in the previous section, the California

scale has been found ueeful in understanding factors related

to the referral for convulsive therapy and the evaluation of

clinical response following
have been undertaken with

questions:
population?

a

treatnent. Further studies

such

this scale in regard to the following

1) What does the

F

scale neasure in our psychiatric

2) What are the behavioral changes induced with

convulsive therapy?

3)

How

are theee changes related to the

degree of altered brain function?

�-25answer the

To

first

question, in part, the entire

in-patient population of the hospital was given the

later

One month

they were retested with a "reverse"

in which each statement

original.

The

was changed

"reverse" scale

was

F

scale.

F

scale,

to the opposite of the
scuzred in the same manner

as the conventional scale, with high scores

this procedure

reflecting greater
to determine

agreement.

The purpose of

whether the

to
the contents
related
patients' responses were

was

of the statements, or were a manifestation of a more general

personality aspect, such as acquiescence.

It

was found

that those patients

who made low

scores

originally, indicating predoninant disagreement with the
statenents,
indicating
who made

showed a

large increase

the "reverse" scale,

on

In contrast, patients

a high degree of agreement.

high scores

initially

showed

little

change on

retesting,

agreeing with the statements to the sane extent even though
the meaning was reversed.
low

I score patients are

while those with high

It is
more

evident that, in our population,

critical

I scores are

more

and

discriminating persons,

undifferentiating and

�.26..
and stereotyped in

their reactions.

is related to the process of selection

This observation
or

patients for convulsive therapy.

A

high degree of atereotypy

or thinking and communication is inconpatable with the establishment of a conventional psychotherapeutic

relationship, preventing

the psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy stressed at

Hillside Hospital. It follows that the high

sill

be

F

score patients

unsuccessful in psychotherapy and nest likely reterred

for convulsive therapy.
To

answer the second end

patients were given the
treatnent period)

and

F

third questions raised above,

69

scale before, during (at 10-12

after convulsive therapy.

Ten of

these

and
the
control
constituted
random,
group
at
selected
'patients,

received subconvulsive electrostinulation.

nean
There was a

increase of 05.7 during treatment in the convulsive group, a

difrerence significant at the
control group
(+0.5).

The

showed an

SS

level. In contrast, the

insignificant

change during the cane pertd

extent or increase in the convulsive patients

was

�-27-

related to the degree of cerebral dysfunction as

found to be

determined by delta

delta

(h0%

+8.6.

activity

on

the

EEG.

Those

F

patients with high

or more of the sanple record) had a nean increase of
low
with
delta indices, however, showed a
patients

statistically insignificant increase of
the

The

+3.h.

Following treatnent

scores were comparable to the pretreatnent levels.
These findings support and elborate previous observations

the effects of convulsive therapy.

on

the

F

Greater agreement with

seere scale statements during treatment

stereotypy and difficulty in discrimination.

show

conventional

The change

in

I

n

.

P

score thus seen part of the same process shown by the
z

characteristic language changes of increased denial, evasion,
qualification,

I

and use of cliches and stereotyped orpressions

It is also

comparable to the increased

visual

tactile perception

(

and

(

)

difficulty in

and figure-ground

(

).

complex

discninination

)-

Details of these findings were presented at the Eastern
Psychological Association in 1958 and will be elaborated at the

�forthcoming Divisional nesting of the American Psychiatric

Association in
H.

ﬂew

Zork.

Aspects of the TherapistaPatient Relationship Affecting
Choice of Therapz.
As

indicated previously the selection or therapy involves

other aspects than the actual behavioral pattern or the patient.
In the past year further efforts to
been undertaken, emphasizing

relationship.

clarify this

problem have

factors in the therapist-patient

he have hypotheSised

increased tension, frustration

and

that

such

factors as

hostility in the therapist~

patient relationship, as well as implicit

and

explicit pressures

present in the environment have a significant influence in

referral for sonatic therapy.
In a
and

pilot study

76

structured interviews with residents

supervisors were initiated following requests ﬁr sonatotherapy.

These interviews were designed to

referral. It
there

was found

a sudden change

elicit

the basis of the

that in only relatively

few cases was

in the patient's clinical status which

directly led to the referral.

most
In
instances there had been

�-29-

or progression

no change

the presenting eynptons.

in‘

Factors

of
impending
included
the
to
timing
contributing
the referral

diccherge, avoiding administration discharge, and pressure

tron the patient's family or

ward

personnel.

It res

also noted

were'treatod
that ptiients with ainilarhehcvior patterns
given senatotherapy and others none. The
4‘ renged
reasons for this raged from'"whin" to quantitative difference!

differently,

some

.

in synptonetelogy and individual preferences for type of
treatment.

initial

The

conclueien

wen

that in

a

significant

0; cases, factors other then clinical indication played

number

a

role

in the referral. These sane extraneous factors also influenced
the timing or the referrals

is

e

results of these findings

Referral Sheet"

to

was

completed by the

From

c ’Scnatic Treatment

developed‘(see form at end or report) to

therapist whenever somatic therapy is reqneeted.

this questionnaire

we

hope to obtain

further information

regarding indications for somatic treatment, more specific data

�-30.
concerning the therapist-patient interaction, and a more

definite idee of the therapist's expectations for such treatment.

I. Individual Differences in Selection of,
to Convnlsive.Theragz.

and Response

In the elucidation of individual differences related to

sonstic therapy, a variety of peripheral-cognitive procedureshave been used.

tachistoscopic perception of enbedded colored figures

The

has been given to 65
of 35 consecutive
were 20

patients.

experimental group consisted

The

convulsive
referrals for
therapy.

The

controls

patients treated with phenothiazine medication (thorazine

and pronasine) and ten

patients receiving

no somatic

treatment.

All subjects were tested prior to treatment, and after four weeks;
the convulairee were tested s third tine two weeks following the

cessation of treatment.

It

was found

increase in

that there

mean number

was a

statistically significant

of errors with convulsive therapy,

while following treetnent there was e significant decrease from

the pretreatment scores.

at

Controls

made

significantly fewer errors

�.31-

(practice effect).
errors between

patients classified

(per cent time delta)
were

significant difference in

There was a

when compared

as showing low

with high

high retest correlations for all groups.

EEG

changes

changes.

EEG

Marked

There

individual

ditferences in response patterns were noted prior to treatment.
With

brain changes there

was a

reduction in perseveration, conpletion

patients,

and contabulation in some

and and increase in

others,

with no unique patterns attributed to cerebral dysfunction.
Even

in those patients with high

his response pattern

was

showing completion type

to

make such

EEG

'stjh'

changes, the

ntein naintained.

Thus a

errors prior to treatment

ore

patient
would continue

errors with convulsive therapy, although the threshold

at which completion

was shown might change.

Details of this study

were_presented at the Eastern Psychological Association in

Atlantic city, April 1959.
The Red and

h?

Irene Test (after Witkin)

was

administered to

Harked
somatic
for
referred
therapy.
consecutively
patients

individual dirierencee in performance were correlated with age,

�w

_‘“

.v

.32-‘
education and score on the Calibrnia

vertical

Judgment of the

frame

(field dependent)

F

scale. Patients

whose

ﬁes strongly influenced by the sunnunding
were more

frequently referred for

convulsive therapy than drug therapy.

No

significant

change

‘

was found

with drug or.convulsive treatment.

convulsive groups

retest correlations

drug

For both/and

were high (.86 and
on

differences
in the
individual
considered
that
is
It
Frame

test reflect personality factors that are

in psychiatric treatment.

.88).

Rod and

of importance

�5

“J

a

,

:1: 7/16/59

L,

wig/r
1

_/

Function
Brain
Altered
Following Electroehcck
‘

24.927

Progress Report

-

Febmary 1. 1958

-

September 1, 1959

m:
L

previous
In our
studies

we have

demonstrated

that

an understanﬁng

of the convulsive therepy process required a nultifectoriel approach involving neurophysiologic, perceptual, personality, paychodynemic and

eocielogic eepecte cf behavior. Thus

is essential

it wee ehcwn that:

The

convuleim

to the therapeutic process (Fink, Green end Kuhn, 1958);

murcmeielegic

changes

reflective of altered brain function ere e

a Heinetein, 1956; Fink &amp; Kenn. 1957)
neceeeery prerequisite for behavioral change end ixproveemt‘ the
(Kuhn, Fink

biochemical beeie of the convulsive therapy preceee lay

level of cholinergic activity of the central nervous

is an

mm

increased

(Fink, 1958);

there are characteristic perceptual chengee with altered brain function
induced by convulsive therapy (Fink, Kuhn and Korin, 1957; Kehn and

Pink, 1957);

retina cf

improvement

after convulsive therapy are related

to personality characteristics defined by Rorschach
and

{mm

(Kahn and Fink, 1958).

interviews (Kuhn and Fink. 1957); end that evaluations of

�mm
(Kuhn

8.:

-2.
were

related to changes in syntactic aspects of language

Fink, 1958).

In the pest eighteen (18) months these statics wen completed and
extended, and an investigation of poychophamcologic agents begun. The

{mark
View

we
for these investigation:

of convulsive therapy (Veimtedn

Fink and Kahn, 1957) extended

mandarin patients (Pink,
The

been the nmxrophyeiologic adoptive
Kahn, 1955; Knhn

8c

at all,

1956;

to other physiodynenic treatmmta or

1957)

.

tho
convulsive therapy process were
relieving aspect- of

studied:

1. Siﬂficence or the Commune

Mologic,

A

cooperative study of neuro-

paychologic and bohemian). effects of

electrical

and

inhalant (Indoklnn) induced convuhicaa.

2. @2326 Basic of NeuroMiologg-c Chang: Further studies of
the effects of acute

wtmtric
3.

“notation

agents on both the

Mgwogo

AoEm of

of

marinentnl anticholinergic

'noml“

and

and pout-convulsive EH}.

Comm Thomas

3. Relation of the factors or age, education, nativity and

�n3.
mmotm

(mound w the California

max-aw, duration of
1:. Chang“

clung» to

EEG

hoapiuuuum,
of

F

1"

scale) with selection of

diagnosis and diochnrgo ratings.

scale with treatmnt, and relation of those

indiceo.

h. Mother-Lg and Conwlsivo

Tim-ram:

In aupervioory sessions, alterations in psychotherapy with
convulsive thorapy were studied.

W:

5-

Both patterns or change and individunl diffomnooo on

tuohistoocopio figumﬂ ground

ﬂicker immoy

domination tutu, critical

and perception of the upright with induced

‘

emulsions

were studied.

5093*ch are «tended to dmg therapies and the following studies
undertakom

1.

1010
:1.

c:

Relation of

EEG

charge on acute and ohmnic administration

of poychophamoouticals to clinical behavioral change.

b.

EEG

as a screening device for psychomrnceuuc potency.

�.. h .-

c. Elation of
6.

EEG

EEG

clause: to hallucinogenic activity.

effects at neginide.

2. Omnicstion Patterns:
Relation of induced neurophyeolcgie change to dyadic diversifi-

cation and syntactic language maeuree.

3. Aspects of the Therapist

..

Patient Relationship affecting

choice of somatic therapy.

metudiec
View

have supported and expanded the mumphyaiologxo-adapuu

of convulsive therapy, and dancnetrated that. such a

applicability to our understanding of the

mode

munch

has

of action of psycho-

phamacologic agents.

PROGRESS
A. tar:

l.

REPORT:

Gasman new?!

PROCESS

ﬁgniricance of the Convaleion:
A

cmmrable study of Indoklcn and electrically-induced convulsime

in psychiatric therapy was
control
eubccmuleive

completed.

An

mm demonstrated

changes occurred almost exclusively

electrocomruleive therapy.

The

earlier convulsive-

that.

uinIicant

behavioral

in patients receiving grand

mal

present report is an assessment at

�-5the relative neurophysiologic, behavioral and clinical effects of

hm different

of.
methods

inciting convulsions - electrical

cuxjreet)
and inhalant (indoklon) .
(eltemating

'consemtive
patients referred for convulsive therapy
Thaw-nave

classified
into
were tendonly

Won

/

3Wt,
/
.

,:./

patients
and

by

two groups

the steward

- «isms

Model-oft

mowed in

alternating current in.

in twelve by the inhalstion of heMlumdetlvl—ether

findeklon). In both groups treatment was ochinistered three times a

.5
{f}

[f book for a total of
IKE/o:
x!

I!
if

/

3'

10

to

21;

applications, determined on the basis

clinical criteris by the supervising psychiatrist.

,f‘.

\
A

All patients were tested one to two days prior to the
treatment, following 10.12 treatments, and

first

m weeks renewing the

lost tacatment. In addition to evaluations of

behavioral. change,

tests included nouns-es of intellectual function (five aubtests

In

the Kodachr-Bellme Intelligence Scale), perception (figure-groom!
discrimination using wedded geamtric figures, the perception of

pewdeochrcnstic color plates at high speeds of toohictoocopic
exposure, and the

Stmt moguls“ figure: test),

and

lucid

�.- 6

1e

etﬂtude (the Lennon revision of the California

1"

Scale).

An

testing
of
each
the
periods,
obtained
during
electroencephalogram was
on! mom-ed

for the per cent. time slow

we

(6 ope or slower)

activity

from a continuous 66 second sample.
The

to
failed
Insults

show any

significant inter-group teat

differences between the electroshock and indoklon groupe

at each of

the three test periods.
Inbregtoup
groupe made

onlyale,

that during treatment both

increased errors on the intellectual and perceptual taste,

end had higher

_

hmr,

showed

some

on

the

F

scale.

By two

weeks

otter the

terminal-g

for
tion of treatment both groupe returned to near pretreatment. levels

' moat mete.
Both groupe were comparable for the degree of indeeeed
wave

activity after

for the

10-12 treatments.

indokloa group was 51% and

The

EEG

slow

per cent time slow activity

for me electroshock group

It? 5%.

within each group individual differences in behavioral change were
the
with
thoee
change
of
neurophysiologic
the
degree
to
reload
behavioral
change.
the
greateet
sharing
delta
cent
tine
highest per

�-7mm: order correlations batman changes in

test

performance and

degree of slow wave activity with treatment. were positive

fer all

proeedwes, except the eomehension subtest of the Wechalar-Bellevm,

level of statistical significance for digit. span
1" scale (4* .33,
13
.05).
.01), object Assembly (hub,

and reached a

(+ 1,61, p

p

.05), ucmnoacopac perception (+.67, p

of embedded figures («13, p
This study demonstrated

.01) and perception

.05).

that up different

eonvulsant. agents

produce similar neurophysiologic and behavioral changes.

eencluded that. the behavioral change

It was

is related

in convulsive therapy/to the

degree of altered brain function, and

an

non-speciﬁc for the type

of agent. used to induce the eohvulsion.

(mud,

in part, at the Eastern Psychological Assecatien,

Atlantic City, April, 1959).

2. modicum ”mate of the Convulsive
The

significance of high voltage

There}?! l’ﬁt‘eceae2

m

delta activity in the

convulsive therapy process (Ruth 213.1) 1951, 1957; Fink and Wm,
1957) and the

report that this delta activity

ministration
(mate

was blocked by the

of the antteholinergic agents atropine and scepolamine

and Johnson, 1957) provided the

basis t‘or mane studies.

As

�-

8 a.

there Here attendant unpleuent systemic etfeote with the comm-tre-

tion of these agents, report: describing diethulne as an
entioholmcrglc

effects (Jenknor

compound

with potent neurologlc but

mm manic

and Loohner,19553 Lechner, 1956) 13+. us

studies similar to those of Ulett

and John-on

using

(Rink, 1956). These observations with diethacine

this

to mderteke
compound

lot to the investiga-

tion of other experimental antichollnerglc agents.
Clinical and electroencephalographic responses to the intravenou-

adninistration of dicthaxine
and atropine

in plychntrlc patients at

therapy were studied. Each
The

Win. 2299,

is

bemctyam,

JD

318,

dB

336

various: etegee of convulsion

a potent antiohollnergic agent

121

um.

eubjecte were ninety psychiatric patients referred for

convulsive therapy, ranging in age from 18 to 67, with

Wes.

A

total of

107 observations were rude,

a.

since

variety of
some

subjects

were studied with more than one compound.
The

observations were

8 channel

made

in the

EEG

laboratory ucing a standard

instrument and needle electrodes. In each

coupound under study was

tual,

the

mastered intravenously at a set rate

�-9

..

per minute until clinical behavioral

oz-

eleetrogrephic changes were

observed.

It was
was

observed that

salinistrstion of these sntichonnergic agents

associated with e) dosynchmmisstion of

bloom

of post-convulsive delta

activity;

EEG

1:)

rhythms with

s

alerting, excitstory

behavioral response with illusory, delusional end Mllucinatory

mention,

and c) systemic

effects of muscular weakness, dryness of

the south, dry skin and techycerdia.
end systemic

effects

The

electromﬂuc, behavioral

were concurrent.

These observations are regarded as consistent with the suggestion

that the physiologic basis

in central

of, convulsive therapy

nervous system cholmergic

Observations

that

LSD,

lies in

an increase

activity.

substantive, nasceline

sympathemnetic and
antihistaminic agents

-

and diphenhydmmns

also induced

convulsive
d‘
delta
desynchronisation, blocking
post

EEG

activity

clinical oucitstory scﬁviw support the suggestion that the

and

mvioral

md electrogrsphio patterns of these compounds are also based on

alteration in synoptic activity. Increased synaptic activity
(cholinergic, synpethclytic effects) is sssocieted with

-

EEG Immora-

synchreniseticn, and clinical sodation and euphoric; while decreased

�.. 1o

-

synapmc

activity (anticholimrgic, sympathmimtnc) is mandated

with

dosynchmniution and clinical excihtory and hallucinogmic

EEG

states, thus supporting the Wthesia mually

described mama

by Wilder (19514).
algont,
atropine,
Deacrepant observations with the anticholinergic

are considered to be related to significant differences in dosage.
(Presumed, in

put,

San
d‘
Biological
Paymatry,
the
Society
at

first

Francisco, 1958 and awarded tbs
Award of

that Society; and, in part, at

City, 1959. Published, in part,
380-387, 19573 and accepted

3. Socio

a.

A. E. Bennett

cal

01

A

A

1.

A

American

EEG

PsycIﬁItrio Research

Somty, Atlantic

Arch. Neural.

&amp;

cMat. g9.

for publiaation, ma Olin. Nemﬂmool.)
shiatric Treatment

ate of

Duration at Hoggtaluation.

Dawn

and

.'

Madam

Evaluation.

In an earlier study of the Hillside Hospital populationmahn,
Pollack

birth

:3:

and

Pink, 1957).

it

was noted

social attitudes

that age, causation, place of

F
California
measured
the
by
as

were related to the aelecﬁm of therapy. Those pation‘ua

older,

had

less education,

scores on the

F

scale,

who were

were foreign-born am with high stereotype

scales were

more

likely to waive convulsive therapy.

�- 11
In oontmt, petiente
I

‘

who were

..

younger, better eduoehdmetiveobem

end obtained it»: theeoree on the

1’"

scale, received peyoheﬂmerepy ee

their sole router treatment.
nutty
Another
wee undertaken to determine the relations of theee
eodepeyohologioal factore to 1) the duration of hospitalization,
2) the

Meal

evaluations at time of discharge, and 3) the final

diegxoaia.
The

entire impatient edalt population

studied. This oomieted

on!

maize in age from 16 to

171

68

patients,

years,

no:

on March

7,

1957 was

57 men and 11];

mo,

a median of 35 years.

Patients hospitalized for the shortcut period (1 - 5 months)
were noted

to

be the

oldest, have the least education, were

more

likely to be foreign-hem, and have the highest scores on the
“

scale. Younger, native-bum,

more educated,

loner

months).
(10
more
the
or
longest
each hoepitelieed

ship

of:

F

more patients
The same

these factors to length of hosmtelizetion was found

eepehte Ienelyeee

them

F

relation»
when

were made according to diagnosis and type of

(eomleive thempy or peyohotherepy).

�,'

12 u.

Discharge evaluations of improvemnt were significantly related

_

to age

-

the older patients having the most favorableratingm

Miami! of the date by type of treetnent,hovever, demonstrated that
among

the oeuvulsive therapy patients rating: of recovered or

much

inproved were
given to those patients with the highest F scores,

least education

and who were foreign-born.

Diagnoses of schizophrenia or peyohomuroeie were

undated

with lower F eeoree, younger ages, more education and native birth.
The

older, less educated, femignnborn, high

more

F

score patients were

frequently classified as involutionel or mic—depressive

psychosis.

It was

postulated that these relationships reﬂect the influence

of nodal background and psychological proceeoee, such as the
behavioral patterns of communication and modes of expression. These
Thane

not only oontﬂbute to the pattern of mental illness, but

affect all aspects

of the patientoﬂxerapiet

interactim.

(Pmeented at the Beaten: Psychological Association, Atlantic City g

April, 1959, and the Acedm of Psychoanalysis, Philadelphia, April,
1959. Accepted

for publication, Archives of General Psychiatg.)

�.. 13 ..
13.

Treatment.
Convuleive
with
Social
Attitude
in
Gwen:
Following the earlier observations that the California

is

1“

scale

useful in understanding mien-a1 for ccnvuleive therapy and the

evaluation of clinical reepcnee following such treatment, ﬁzz-ﬂier

studies were undertaken with thieeeale in regard to the {alluring
1) iihet deal the F scale measure in a psychiatric

question:
a

population? 2) Dc

1“

scores change with convulsive therapy? 3) Are

these changes related to the degree of altered brain function?

entire in-patient population of the heepital was given the

The

:16 one month

scale,

in

later,

was

retested with a "reverse“

ﬁnch each statement wee changed

The “reverse"

scale

as

to the opposite

or!

F

F

scale,

the original.

scored in the same manner as the ccnventicnal

scale, with high ecoree reflecting greater agreement.

It

was noted

that than patient:

who made low

scores

initially,

showed
an
with
the
statements,
disagreement
indicating a wedcninant

increase on the "reverse" scale, indicating a high degree of agreement. In contrast, patients the mde high scores

little

change on

initially

shaved

same
the
to
etatexunte
the
with
agreeing
reteeting,

�..

m ..

extent even thong: the nearing was reversed.

let:

P score

patients are

more

critical

and

It is

evident that

diesﬂmimting persons ,

while those with high F scores are more undifferentietihg and

stereotyped in their reactions.
This

aberration is related to the process or selection of

patients for convulsive thmpy.
thinking and commutation
on!

A

high degree or sterotwpy of

is incomtsble with the

a conventional psychotherapeuﬁc rehtionship,

psychoanalyticslly—oriented psychotherapy stressed

Hospital.

It

follows that the high

F

establishment

meeting the
at Hillside

score patients will be

unsuccessful in psychotherapy and most likely referred for con-

vulsive therapy.
In anotlmr study, sixtr-ndne patients were given the F scale

berm,

during

therapy.

Ten

(st

10-12

treatmnt period)

patients, selected at

group and received subconvulsive
mean

increase in

group

a.

F

random,

and

after convulsive

constituted a control

electrostimlsuon.

There was

s.

score of +5.7 during treatment in convulsive

a difference significant

at the

5%

level. In contrast, the

�- 15
In conﬁnes. the control group

..

showed an

insignificant change during

the echo period (+0.5). The extent of increase in me convulsive

petieﬁts was related to the degree of cerebral dysfunction es

&lt;1er

by

delta sctiﬂw

on the

m.

The

patients with my:

d6“? (1:010: 3955 of the mp1” 1‘3“”) had a

//
l'hebe patientsvith

mean

'

increase

e

a ’8’6”

f

low

delta indioes, however,

off 43.14,. Following treatment the

showed an

increase

3

2/

15’03&amp;8tashv

,f
1/

/

”(7/
-/'4,7,3?
,.

V

,2”

/
/

,.

/"5

scores were comparable to the

levels.

‘

,

‘

“these ,flndmgs support and eleborste previous observations on the

[5%.

,2)"

,

7752/

1"

cadets” e’f convulsive therapy. Greater agreement with the
,.

scale

‘f

std/Wes

/}

F

during treatment show conventional stereotypy and

3"

/r

(35“:ow

I
_

1n

discrimineuon.

Changes

in

F score thus

parallel the

fo’hehoteristio hnguege changes or increased denial, evasion,

///

"

,

,/,.L‘

,r

l7

//qdeiﬂicetlon,

'

/
/

and use of cliches and stereotyped expressions (Kuhn

‘

j"

&amp;

2

Fink, i953) .

It 1. .1“ ompmble to the

increased difficulty in

/

/

l

/

/

cochlea:

visual and tactile perception (Flak,

fairs-groom discrimination
j’(heseo1{;e§ at.

Knhn

(Karmic Fink, 1957).

/ﬂbyohletrlc Association,

at the Divisions].

Meeting of the American

3'

‘81

I

‘-

r

{'1' 4"

Karin, 1957) and

the Eastern Psychological Association, 1958; and

aeoepced for?" presentation

‘

8:

New

York, November 1959.)

�~16-

h.

Psychotherapy and thsicdzgamic Therapy:

Previous studies indicated that patients referred for
of
electroshock in this hospital are/two types. The largest
number are

patients in the older

education and are foreign born.

age groups who have
They tend

to

be

limited

non-introspective

persons, stereotyped in their language and thinking and verbally
unconnunicative. Their predominant symptoms are depression,

agitation, withdrawal

and somatisation.

The

second, and

smaller, group of patients are younger, native-born, bettereducated, and verbally communicative with a capacity for

introspection.

They

characteristically exhibit thinking

disorders and overactive behavior, with lesser degrees of

aonatisation and depression.
Four

patients,

two

for each group described above were

studied to determine 1) reasons for referral,

different attitudes
management, and

2) whether

were required in psychotherapeutic
3) the

relation of the psychotherapeutic

�-17.
approach to the

patient's clinical response to convulsive

therapy.

It

was

suggested that these patients were referred for

convulsive therapy because of a failure of communication in
the psychotherapeutic relationship.
a

In two cases this was

reflection of the patient's limited verbal

and

introspective

capacity related to educational and social factors.

instances, however, the impaired communication
by unmanageable

was

In two

manifested

acting out behavior.

Following treatment,

is older, less educated patients

were able to maintain a behavioral change with a

reassuring,

supportive technique, amplifying tendencies to minimization
and denial developed during electroshock.

In the better

educated patients, electroshock decreased acting out was

associated with increased use of interpretive forms of psychotherapy.

It

uas concluded

that the relationship of psychotherapy

to convulsive therapy varies with the communication pattern

�~18 -

and

adaptation

shown by

the individual patient. (Published

in the Journal of Hillside
S.

Hos

ital,

1: 17-25, 1958).

Perception:
A

variety of perceptual-cognitive test procedures have

been studied in

l.

patients receiving somatic therapies.

Tachistoscopic Perception of
Colored Figures:

The

Embedded

This task was studied in an experimental group

consisting of

35

consecutive referrals for convulsive therapy,

and "control" groups of 20

patients treated with phenothiazine

medication (thorazine and pronasine) and ten patients receiving
no somatic

treatment, matched for age. All subjects were tested

prior to treatment,
were

and

tested akhird time

after four
two weeks

weeks the convulsive

patients

following the cessation of

treatment.
There was a
number of

there

statistically significant increase in

errors with convulsive therapy,

was a

significant decrease

mean

and following treatment,

from the pretreatment scores.

"Control” subjects made significantly fewer errors (practice

�-19-

effect).

significant difference in errors between

There was a

patients classified as
delta)

when compared

showing low

with high

EEG

changes (per cent

changes.

EEG

tine

There were high

retest correlations for all groups.
There were marked individual differences in response

patterns prior to treatment.

With brain changes there was a

reduction in perseveration, completion and confabulation in
some

patients,

and an increase in

others, with

patterns attributed to cerebral dysfunction.

patients with high
pattern

was

EEG

no unique
3V0“

in

thOBO

changes, the ”style" of his response

maintained. Thus a patient showing completion

type errors prior to treatment would continue to make such

errors with convulsive therapy, although the threshold at
which completion was shown might change.
were

Details of this study

presented at the Eastern Psychological Association in

Atlantic City, April 1959.
2.

Rod and Frame

Test gWitkinzs

This task was administered

to h? patients consecutively referred for somatic therapy. Marked

�-

20

-

with
correlated
age,
were
in
performance
individual differences

education and score
judgment of the

frame

(field

on

vertical

was

dependento were more frequently referred for
No

significant

treatment.
found with drug or convulsive

convulsive groups

It

retest cerrelations

change

For both drug and

were high (*.86 and +.88).

is considered that individual differences

Frame

whose

influenced
by the surrounding
strongly

therapy.
than
drug
convulsive therapy
was

Patients

the California F.ecale.

on

the

Rod and

of
importance
are
that
factors
test reflect personality

in psychiatric treatment.
B. PSYCHOPHARHAOOLOGIO STUDIES

1. Neuroghzsiologic Studies:
view
the
of
neurophysiologic~adaptive
the
to
Acoprding

convulsive therapy process, the clinical efficacy of repeated
induced convulsions

is dependent

upon the

induction of

a

providing
function,
nervous
central
in
alteration
persistent
the
with
interaction
the
in
subject's
a milieu for changes
examiner and the environment.

In these studies the best

been
of
those
has
aspects
change
of
neurophysiologic
index

the
electnoin
by
delta
activity
reflected
function
cerebral

�enoephalogran (Fink and Kahp,1957).
The

efficacy of

newer psychopharnaceuticals in

altering

psychotic behavior patterns has led to the suggestion of aI/ﬂ
,1
1}

similar hypothesis for the node of action of these agents{ and
to studies of the relationship and specificity of altﬁred

behavioral patterns to neurophysiologic change as reflected
in electroencephalography.
Of

an

the psychophsrmaceuticals tested in acute experiments

increase in syhchrony with or without an increase in slow

wave

and

activity

has been observed for chlorpromasine, pronasine

triflupronasine. Behaviorally, these drugs

were

associated with a) increasing sedation,drowsiness, denial
and euphoria;

b) decreasing

agitation, panic, excitement

and

delusional and hallucinatory activity; and c) minimisation
and displacement or synptons.
an

Barbiturates regularly induced

increase in fast activity with an increase in synchrony,

with the associated behavorial changes of sedation, euphoria,

denial and minimization.

Amphetamine and methamphetamine

increased fast activity without increased synchrony and

behaviorally were associated with behavorial alerting, hyponania,

�-

-

22

excitement and increased motor activity.
and per cent time of slow wave

post-convulsive delta activity

Decrease in voltage

activity in subjects with
was seen

with LSD-2S,

bcnactyzine, Win-2299, JB~318, JB~336 and diethasine.

Of

these drugs, benactyzine produced increased alerting, excitement, tension and panic; the other drugs also produced

illusory

sensations and hallucinatory, delusional and paranoid ideation.
The

electrographic patterns were consistently altered

concurrently with behavioral changes both in the acute and
chronic administration studies.

Tranquilization, euphoria,

sedation and minimization of symptoms were concurrently

associated with increased

EEG

synchronization and shift of

frequencies to the delta range.

Agitation, tension, panic,

excitement, illusions and hallucinations were associated with

desynchronisaticn of frequencies.
Similar patterns were demonstrated in subjects with

prior delta activity. Agents that tended to synchronize
frequencies, as chlorprcnazine and barbiturates, augmented the
per cent tine delta activity and enhanced the clinical patterns;
agents that desynchronized frequencies, as diethasine, LSD-25

�-23and

benactyzine, minimized the clinical effects typically

ascribed to repeated convulsions.
Various experimental psychopharnaceutioala were tested.
In addition to extensive studies or 3-3 methylethylgiutarimide

(Heginide) and hexetluorodiethylether (Indoklon) the following

nhsnyltoloxanine
(PHD-Bristol), methenalide
agents were studied:

(BLH~lﬂl;lhristol), tropin-h-Ghlorhenzhydryl ether (WI-21h9,
Wyeth), dinethylaninsethanel and

verieties, Riker),

JB-3;;,

its

oongeners (Deaner and

329 and 336

(various piperidyl-

Geigy).
and
(Torrinil,
Lakeside)
inipranine
bensilatss,

significant behavioral

Because or 31:31

changes, a
was

and

electrogrephic

intestigation
of imipramine (Torrinil),
nere intensive

undertaken. In

28

acute experiﬂmenta, consecutive patients

referred for physiodynnmie therapies

were

tested in the

EEG

TofrEnil
solution
of
treatment.
various
stages
at
laboratory
(10 ng/oc) was administered intravenously

until electrographic or behavioral changes
a

total of

h0-12S

mg

at

a

set rate

(1 cc/ho sec)

became prominent,

(0.5-2.5 mg/kg). Behavioral observation

for

�«Zh-

and

In

electrcgraphic recording continued for one to three hours.

patients referred for pharmacotherapy because of manifest

depressive, withdrawn or retarded behavior oral Torranil of
75-350

mg

administered.

was

In the acute studies there was

initial restlessness,

associated with dissiness, dry mouth, “taintness,” nausea,
and on

tour occasions, voniting. These

symptoms

persisted for

t

10-20 minutes, and were accompanied by lasdtude, heaviness

of the extremities and eventual drowsiness.
unchanged or slowed.

Blood

Heart rate was

pressure dropped by

in older (age&gt;’ 60) patients.

20-ho%

Subsequently, subjects were

relaxed, quiet and disinclined to activity, even

when

returned

to their ward.
The

electrcgraphic patterns accompanying these behavioral

changes were

initiated

during the injection.
had been halved.

activity,

such

by a gradual
By

in decrease in voltages

ten minutes, the per cent tine alpha

In patients with moderate anounts of beta

activity occasionally increased in voltage

and

�-25per cent time.

twenty minutes, in association with

By

behavioral lassitude, low voltage (to

theta frequencies

(5—?

50

nicrovolts)

random

In records with post~

cps) appeared.

convulsive delta activity, there was a marked decrease in

voltage and per cent time of slow
graphic patterns persisted for

i

wave

to

two

There was considerable individual

acute

EEG

of Torrinil,

EEG

who

These

electro-

hours.

variability in this

received 100

mg

or more

all

and behavioral changes were observed in

In six patients, dosage of TorrEnil less than 50

but three.
were

In patients

response.

activity.

associated neither with

EEG

mg

nor with behavioral changes.

In chronic Torranil studies, behavioral changes generally
appeared during the second, and were maximal during the
week of
was

treatnent.

The most prominent

euphoric denial.

behavioral adaptation

Patients complained less of somatic

symptoms, and denied, minimized or displaced

inquiry.

It

became

lite relationships

third,

their illness

on

increasingly difficult to discuss significant
with then.

In six patients sonatisation and

�restlessness increased

and depressive

affect persisted. In

three, restlessness, agitation, excitement, insomnia and
vomiting, led to the cessation of therapy.

No

change in

sfgntons were noted in five patients after four weeks of

therapy.
Electrographio studies
a decrease

on

chronic administration showed

in voltages with poorer record modulation.

voltage theta (S~7 cps) activity up to
defined

fast activity

10%

r‘

became more p~ominent

appeared.

Low

Well

in a few.

(presented at the Collegian Interantionale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum, Rome, September, 1958)

at the

Conference on

Depression and Allied States, Montreal, March, 1959] and
American

EEG

Society, June, 1959; Published, in part, in the

3

Proceedings of C;I.N.P. Psychopharnaoology Frontiers, ed. 3.
9

Kline, 325-332, 19593 Canad. J.
Neurologz, g} 682~685, 1958.

Pe

chiat.,

1959

(in prose);

�-272.

Language

Patterns as Resource of Behavioral and

Nauroghzsielogic Change with Drugs.

In previous studies of the convulsive therapy process,

it

was demonstrated

that

syntactic

two language measures, a

content analysis (Kahn and Fink, 1958) and dyadic diversification
a

scores or instructured interviews (Jaffe,

Kahn and

Pink, 1958)

provided objective indices of behavioral change, and were

related to the degree of altered brain function. "In a further

test of these

language measures as indices of behavioral and

neurophysiologic change, they were applied to interview

on

’

acute administration of various psychopharnacologic agents.
Seventy-two interviews with patients at various stages
of drug therapy have been analyzed, using the following agents:

emobarbital, benactyzine, ohlorpronazine, diethazine, lysergie—
acid diethylanide, and Win-2299.
unFollowing a routine electrographic recording, an

structured psychiatric interview, with short periods of
{\‘\

structured inquiry,
g

was tape

recorded. With

EEG

running,

intravenouq injection was then given at a slow rate.

When

on

�—28-

specific electrogrsphic or clinical changes were induced, the
interview

was

repeated.

Recording periods of

EEG

and verbal

behavior were alternated for the duration of the observation

period.

The

shifts in
(delta)
The

EEG

was measured

for changes in synchronization,

dominant frequencies, and per cent time of slow waves

and beta frequencies.

tape recordings were transcribed and measured for the

diversification of consecutive
participants (dyadic)

and for

25 word samples

of speech of both

syntactical changes. In the

dyadic analysis, the pooled verbal behavior of both participants
was

transcribed, divided into

25 word

samples, and for each sample

the ratio of the number of different words to the
words (a

diversification score)

was

calculated.

total
The

number of

syntactic

langw ge analyses were based on the response to standardized

questions using a method previously described (Kahn and rink,
1958), scoring such changes as syntactical use of person, alteration

in tense, evasion, qualification, displacement or verbal denial
of symptoms, use of stereotyped expression or cliches, cryptic

�-29withdrawal
and
or
response,

silence.

the
both
dyadic
observed
in
were
changes
Consistent

diversification
classified

and

syntactic language neasurss in subjects

behavioral
and
according to the neurophysiologic

effects of the drugs applied.
neurophysiologic
are
and
chlorpronasine
Ancbarbital
high
inducing
regularly
imobarbital
synchronising agents.

at
activity
fast
synchronised
voltage well
chlorpronasine administration

synchronisation of the

EEG

was

20¢2h cps, while

increased
folloudd by

record and a shift to slower

occasional
slow
including
frequencies

wave

burst activity.

sedation
and
with
associated
Behaviorally these drugs are

tranquilisation.
in stereotpy

and

On

increase
was
an
there
measures
the language

with
increasing
associated
repetitiveness

displacement
in
and-evasion.
cliches,
tense,
alterations
of
use

Diethasine, benactysine,

LSD—25

and Wine2299 areheuro»

compounds.
desynchronizing
physiologic

These drugs are

and
decreased
per
voltage
with
associated
characteristically

�-30-

cent tins of alpha activity and increased irregular low

voltage fast activity.
or

Behaviorally hallucinatory, exoitatory

illusory activity are observed.

there

was

On

the language measures

decreasing repetitiveness, wide diversity of words,

less variability of diversification scores, and decreased use
of cliches and

alterations in tense.

Further explaation of language neasures are suggested as
a

rational basis for the understanding of the psychologic effects

of the new therapies.

(Presented at the Conference

on Peychodynanio,

Psychoanalytic

and Sociologic Aspects of the Neuroleptic Drugs in Psychiatry,

Montreal, April, l958, and at the American Psychiatric

Association, Philadelphia, April, 1959.
3;

To

be

published).

Aspects of the Therapist-Patient Relationship Affed ting
”
Choice of Therapy.
The

selection of therapy involves aspects other than the

manifest behavioral patterns of the patient.

In the past year

further efforts to clarify this problem have been undertaken,
emphasising factors in the therapist-patient relationship.

We

�-31have hypothesized

that frustration

therapist-patient relationship

and

and

hostility in the

implicit or explicit

environmental pressures have a significant influence in referral

for somatic therapy.
In a
and

pilot

study

76

structured interviews with residents

supervisors were initiated following requests for sonato~

therapy.

these interviews were designed to

elicit

the basis of

the

referral. It

was

there a sudden change in the patient's clinical status

which

vas found that in only

directly led to the referral. In

relatively

few cases

most instances there

had been no change or progression in the presenting symptoms.

Factors contributing to the timing of the referral included
impending discharge, avoiding administrative discharge, and

pressure tron the patient's fanily or ward personnel.

It

was

also noted that patients with similar behavior patterns were

treated differently, sons given eonatctherapy and others none.
The

reasons for this ranged from ”thin" to quantitative

differences in syntonatology and individual preferences for
type of treatment.

�-32-

It

was concluded

that factors other than clinical

indication played a role in the referral in a significant
number of

cases. These

the timing of the
As

a

extraneous factors also influenced

referrals.

result of these findings

Referral Sheet"

was developed

be completed by the

requested.

same

From

a ”Sonatic Treeteent

(see for: at end of report) to

therapist ehenever somatic therapy is

this questionnaire

and continued

and ward personnel interviews we hope to obtain

therapist

further

infernation regarding indications for somatic treatment,
more

specific data concerning the therapist-patient interaction,

and a more

definite idea of the therapist's expectations for

such treatment.

�Soptonbor 1, 1959
A

an»-

«

FINAL REPORT

H~927*

’

Doportmont of Exporinontnl Psychiatry
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Glen Oaks, L.

1.,

N.

I.

Aoknowlodgnont
Summury, Five Yours, 195k

- 1959
Summary #h, Feb. 1, 1958 - Sept. 1, 1959
Publications, 195h - 1959

Prosontationl,

Initial studios

19Sh

~

1959

a.
b.
2S

30

bogun 1:11 1953, supportod by tho Board of

Diroctora' nooonroh Fund. Supported by Nationul Institute
of Mental Honlth Fund, Soptombor l, 195k - August 31, 1959.
Study continuing with support of grant MI-2715, United Statos
Public Health Sorvico (Jan. 1, 1959)

�Acknowledgment

studies reported here would not have been possible
without the faith and support or the Founder at Hillaide
Hospital, Dr. Iorael Strauss, the Board of Directors and tho
Administrator, Hr. Maurice Bachraoh, who auetained this
program during its early vicissitudes.
Financial Support was also given during this period by
the Kaufman Foundation, the Foundatione' Fund for Research in
Psychiatry, the Daaian Foundation of New fork; the following
pharmaceutical firms: Smith, Kline and French Laboratoriea,
Wyeth Laboratories, Geigy Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol
Laboratories; and the Mental Health Board of Nassau County.
The

�SUMMARY

14-927
19Sh - 1959

laboratories of the Departnent of Experimental Psychiatry
were established at hillside Hospital in September, 195k. During
this five year period neurophysiologic, psychologic (personality
and perceptual), lingustic, and socioloéic aspects of "somatic"
psychiatric therapies have been the principal foci.
The

1.

Convulsive Therapy:
The view of the convulsive therapy process as the induction
or a non-specific state or altered brain functbn, similar to.

craniocerebral trauma (10, ll, 21) was supported and amplified
with this altered cerebral milieu, subjects were seen to respond
in various ways (26) of which the most successful was explicitf
verbal denial (7, 31). This latter was most prominent in
characterologically disposed individuals (36).
in alteration in brain function was pro-requisite to
behavioral change (7, 8, 11, 26). Grand mal seizures were
this
to
essential
process (26) but electrical induction was not
(Boh2). Such alteration in brain function was measured by
various ways including electroencephalography (6, ll, 12, 2h, 39,
language patterns (h, 7, 1h, 31, h}, B-Zh), perceptual tasks
(2, 16, 17, 37, hé, 8-26, h1, h?) and tests of recall.
A variety of behavioral changes were seen during convulsive
therapy (26, 8—17). Such patterns were lbwed as adaptations to
altered brain function,wand were believed dependentlupon
Refcrbnce nunEers are to publications or presentations (5- I
listed in the appendix.

�characterologic and environmental factors (7, 25, 26, 36, ho).
Clinical ratings of improvement were seen as value Judgments by
the observer of the behavioral changes in the subject (26).
Adaptations characterised by denial mechanisms, both in behavior
(3—17) and in language a, 31) were assessed with the best rating
of improvement. Such adaptations were noted to be related to
habitual nodes of conduct (character, personality) (36, Bull,
‘

32).

durability of the altered behavioral nodes was seeh‘.
to be dependent upon such factors as the degree and duration of
altered brain function, the environnental expectations, and the
type and degree of family and medical support. Different
behavioral patterns were best supported by varyinc types of
The

psychotherapy (19).

It

also suggested that the neurophysiologicgbasis or
convulsive therapy nay lie in an alteration in central synaptic
cholinergic ~ adrenergic relationships, with a predominant
shirt to increased cholinergic activity as the operationally
significant pattern. Such interpretations were based on the
relationship of high voltage EEG slow wave activity to behavior!
change (6, ll, 26) and the blocking of the electrographic and
behavioral changes in central anticholinergic agents (21, 3h, 35
hl, ht) and by central synpathonimetics (ha).
Heasures of linguistic behavior in structured (7, 31) and
unstructured (1h, 29, B-2h) interviews showed characteristic
was

�-

3

-

alterations towards increased denial, minimisation, displacement,
stereotypy and repetitiveness, related to the degree of altered
brain function (B-Zh). These changes were blocked or reversed
by anticholinergic hallucinogens (21, h3).
Various perceptual tasks provided indices of behavioral
change and were related to the degree of altered brain function.
These included the perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli
(17), snbedded (Gottschaldt) figures (37, 8-16), and tachistoscopically
exposed words (37) and embedded color figures (hl).
Sociopsychologic aspects of age, years or education, nativity
and degree of stereotypy and sonventionality (measured by
California F Scale) were also studied and were related to selection
or therapy, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and treatment
response/ in hospitalized patients (15, 36, ho, hS).
2.
Neurophysiolegic~Adaptive Hypothesis of Somatic Therapy.
Based on these studies, a hypothesis of the node of action
of other psychiatric therapies such as insulin coma, leucotony
and psychotropic drugs, was expressed (10, 33, 38). This view
holds that these therapies are also methods of inducing varying
states or altered brain function, in which varying adaptive
patterns may become prominent. The adaptive pattern is viewed
as dependent upon the type, degree and duration of altered brain
function, the personality of the subject, and tolerances and
expectations of the environment.
Examination of this hypothesis as applied to drug therapies
is now in progress, supported by USPRS grants HI-2092 and
HI-2715.

�Insulin Coma Therapz.
in initial case description (3) showed the significance of
denial patterns and persistent altered brain function to the
behavioral change in this form of therapy.
In an insulin cons - chlorpronazine control study (27),
no differences in hospital improvement ratings were observed in
the two treatment groups. Chlorpronazine was safer, easier to
administer, permitted continued adninistration and allowed for
greater degrees of concurrent relationship therapy than insulin
coma. These observations led to a replacement of insulin come
3.

by psychotropic drugs in

h.

this institution.

Pharmacotherapz.
Also derived from these hypotheses

is the

ongoing program

in evaluating various psychopharnaceuticals. Electrographic
and linguistic analyses of effects of acute intravenous
administration and chronic clinical administration of various

are in progress. EEG patterns, along such
continua as synchronisation~desynchronisstion, and frequency
shift are being related to behavioral (21, 3h, bl, ha) and
linguistic changes (21, h3);
The neurophysiologic basis of experimentally induced
hallucinogenic states have also been interpreted as an alteration in synaptic chemical relations, such that the effective
levels of cholinergic activity is decreased (h2). Initial work
on this hypothesis (
) is now being expanded.
new compounds

�.32..

In addition to these phenomena, other patterns of language and non-

verbal aspects of behavior have been observed which can also be understood as
symbolic forms of adaptation to illness. These include the syntactical use of
the second and third person, changes in mood, withdrawal and selective inatten-

tion, and alterations in sexual behavior (6).
in enduring fashion in patelectroencephalographic records indicated diffuse cere-

These types of behavior have been observed

ients

whose

lesions and

bral dysfunction; In patients with brain damage who did not Show delusional
denial and disorientation on ordinary clinical examination, the phenomena might
be

elicited in

sodium.

an interview following the intravenous administration of amytal

This observation furnished the basis for the ”amytal

test" for brain

disease in which the persistence of certain patterns of denial and disorient-

ation is considered an indication of cerebral dysfunction (h,5).
In considering further the relationship between brain damage and the
mechanism of denial

it

has been demonstrated

that the premorbid personality

important in determining what type of symbolic adaptation occurred.

Thus,

was

pat-

ients with the most striking and enduring manifestations of anosognosia were
those who had habitually used verbal denial and rationalization as a means of
coping with
On

their

problems (10).

the basis of these observations the hypothesis was developed that the

of
creation
the
convulsions
in
induced
lay
of
action
electrically
therapeutic
a milieu of brain function in which the patient might express his problems in
symbolic fashion, particularly in

the form of

explicitly

denying them.

A

case

reported in which a patient received electroshock treatment in an attempt
to relieve intractable pain associated with a Spinal cord tumor (11). After

was

a number of treatments, coincident with the appearance of disorientation for

state, the patient dennot clinically apparent they

a place and time, paraphasic misnaming and a euphoric

ied pain.

‘dhen

these associated.phenomena were

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67354">
                <text>Relation Between Altered Brain Function and Denial in Electroshock Therapy (research), 1955-1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67355">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67356">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-2-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67357">
                <text>1955-1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67358">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67359">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67360">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67361">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence: research with Robert L. Kahn, and Edwin A. Weinstein</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67362">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67363">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80938">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87499">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94060">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100621">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="244" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="35">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/d4673cc7ac4d3b5481723b3db49559a7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7cd1e7dcb45e0955ceb3d6c8e6eafcd7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100661">
                    <text>Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical
Improvement in Electroshock

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.,

Max

Fink, M.D.

Glen Oaks, N.Y.
and
Edwin A.

Weinstein, M.D.

Bethesda,

Md.

Submitted for publication February 23, 1956.

Hillside Hospital (Drs.

Kahn and

of Research (Dr. Weinstein).

Fink). Walter

Reed Army

Institute

supported in part by the Medical Research and
of the Surgeon General, Department of the
Office
Development Board,
and grant M-927 from the
DA-h9-OO7-MD-376;
No.
under
Contract
Army,
of
the
Mental
National
Health
Institutes of
of
National Institute
Health
Public
Service.
U.S.
Health,
This

investigation

was

�\

theories about the mode of action of electroshock
therapy have been offered, the relationship among neurophysiological
and psychological factors remains poorly understood (1,2). Although
While many

changes in brain function

may be

demonstrated

on

electrical recording,

such evidence of impaired function has not been correlated with the
degree of psychiatric improvement. Similarly, although memory defects

learning ability are common manifestations following the
administration of electrically induced convulsions, their severity is
not an index of therapeutic outcome. It would appear that the results
of ordinary clinical and laboratory procedures and psychological tests
do not furnish adequate criteria for a correlation of the alterations
of behavior with the changes in brain function.
In previous studies (3) it has been suggested that the therapeutic action of electroshock therapy was related to the production
of a milieu of brain dysfunction in which denial of illness (anosognosia) might occur. A concept of anosognosia was advanced which
included not only denial of hemiplegia and blindness but denial of
many other aspects of illness and problems of living. It was indicated that anosognosia was not explicable as a focal deficit but was,
rather, a manifestation of a reorganization of perceptual symbolic
function in which the patient represented his problems in an altered
language pattern. In the verbal sphere these language patterns
included explicit denial, disorientation for place and time, reduplication (reduplicative paramnesia), paraphasia, and confabulation.
The patient's feelings about his illness and incapacities could also
be manifested in nonverbal aspects of behavior, such as selective
and impaired

�-2withdrawal, inattention, and muteness (akinetic mutism), altered
sexual behavior, and euphoric, manic states. The particular form
of symbolic adaptation that was used was
of the premorbid personality.

closely related to features

These changes in behavior were found commonly with

infiltrating

neoplasms, with acute vascular

lesions, particularly when associated
with subarachnoid bleeding, and following lacerating brain injury.
electroencephalographic records showed diffuse slow-wave rhythms,
and it appeared that the lesions affected the diffuse projection
systems rather than any specific discrete projection area. Similar
forms of behavior may appear after the operation of prefrontal
lobotomy and, in more transitory form, after the administration of
electroshock convulsions. When the degree of brain damage was
insufficient to permit the elicitation of explicit denial and disorientation on ordinary clinical examination, these phenomena might
be observed when the patient was interviewed after the intravenous
administration of amobarbital (Amytal) sodium. This observation
furnished the basis for the "Amytal test" for brain damage, in which
the persistence of certain patterns of denial and disorientation are
considered as evidence of impaired function (h,5,6,7).
It was reported that in some patients receiving electroshock
treatment for intractable pain, the amobarbital test, which was
previously negative, became positive after a number of convulsions.
Others received as many as 18 shocks without change in the results
The

of the amobarbital

test. It

was

noted that in patients

who

gained

�-3-

relief

from

their complaints

of pain, the amobarbital

positive, whereas in those patients

tests

became

continued to complain of
pain the amobarbital tests remained negative. The purpose of the
present paper is to determine the relationship between the clinical
response to electroshock treatment and the results of the amobarbital test in patients hospitalized for psychiatric illness.
who

METHOD

patient was given a series of amobarbital tests. In this
test, the patient is asked a standard group of questions pertaining
to orientation and the awareness of illness. The drug is then
administered intravenously in a 0.5% solution at a rate of 0.05 gm.
Each

cc.) per minute until nystagmus, slurred speech, drowsiness, and
errors in counting backward are noted. The same questions are then
repeated. The following changes, when persistent,are called
"positive" and are deemed indicative of cerebral dysfunction.
1. Complete denial of illness2. Denial of major aspects of illness, such as attributing
entry into hospital to a trivial or past illness.
(1

hospital, either its proper name or in terms
of some euphemism, such as "rest home".
h. Displacement of the location of the hospital, such as to
another city3.

Misnaming the

5.

Confabulated journey.
Reduplication of the hospital, such as the patient's stating that he is in another hospital of the same or similar

6.

�name.
7.

Disorientation for time of day with confusion of day and

night.
8.

Gross
him a

9.
The

misidentification of the examiner, such as calling
"lawyer" or an "entertainer".

Disorientation for year.
patient was given his first test prior to treatment and

was

retested at weekly intervals. All patients in the series had negative amobarbital tests prior to the ﬂﬁtiation of therapy. Treat—
ments were administered three times a week, so that the patients
were generally tested after every third treatment. A test was given
two days after a treatment and was continued at weekly intervals

after

the termination of therapy

until the result

had become nega-

tive.
Electroencephalographic records and standard tests of memory
and learning ability were also given, but will not be considered
in detail in this paper.
POPULATION

patients at Hillside HOSpital receiving electroshock with the Reiter Electrostimulator were studied. The patients
were not selected by us but were taken on the basis of consecutive
referrals by the clinical staff. Some patients were necessarily
excluded because their treatment was terminated or interrupted before
they were adequately studied. Another patient was omitted because
he had manifestations of brain disease and a positive amobarbital
Twenty—four

�-5-

test prior to electroconvulsive therapy.

The number of

treatments

varied from 9 to 33. Patients who showed clinical improvement
tended to receive fewer treatments. Some of this variability could
also be ascribed to differences in the inclination of the resident
psychiatrists to use this form of treatment. One patient decided
for himself that he had had enough treatment and eloped. Diagnostically, the patients consisted of lh with depressive reactions, 9 with
schizophrenia, and l with manic reaction. There were 15 women and
9 men,

and the ages ranged from 2h to 68, with a median of h?

years.

Evaluation of Response to Electroshock Therapy: All patients
were observed for at least eight weeks after completion of treatment. Determination of the patient's response to electroshock was
made on the basis of the resident psychiatrist's impression, staff
opinion, the nurses' notes, and the clinical evaluation of one of
us (M. F.), who supervised the treatments but was not aware of the
amobarbital test results. On this basis the patients were divided

into three groups.
cases in this group were regarded
as showing recovery or marked improvement. These patients no longer
showed the symptoms which brought them into the hospital: their
doctors felt they were better, and the nurses noted them as being
able to sleep without medication, eating better, getting along with
the other patients, and participating in hospital activities.
A.

Markedly Improved:

The 11

Moderately Improved: The six patients in this group showed
some improvement but continued to manifest indﬂations of mental
B.

�-5-

illness.

patients typically showed symptomatic relief; ELEL’
acute depressive features might be gone, but the dramatic change, so
evident in the first group, was not apparent. Each patient continThese

noticeable disturbance, such as obsessional thinking,
paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
ued to show some
C.

seven

Minimally Improved or Unimproved:

patients in

whom

change was not

showed only equivocal or

In

this group

was

clearly noticeable or

transient improvement.

placed

who

Some showed

fluctu-

ations in behavior, at times appearing somewhat improved. But the
change was not sustained, so that by the end of treatment they
appeared much as they did before.
We are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement.
Others may have differed in the estimates of changes in these
patients. In any case, by using this threefold classification, the
differences between the first and the third group will be distinct.
OBSERVATIONS

Distribution of Positive Reactions: The number of amobarbital tests given to each patient during the course of electroshock
A.

to 13, depending on how long treatment was maintained.
In Table l the data are shown for the number of tests given during
treatment and the number and percentage positive for all the patients

ranged from

3

in each group. The markedly improved patients showed many more
positive reactions than the unimproved group, with the moderately
improved patients between these groups. Every markedly improved
patient had at least one positive amobarbital reaction during

�-7the other hand, one of the moderately improved
patients and five of the unimproved patients never showed a positive
result. A comparison of the results in each group, using the x2
test, is statistically significant at better than the 1% level of

treatment.

0n

confidence.
B.

Positive Reactions at

Each Stage of Treatment:

In the

Figure the groups are compared for the percentage of patients in
each group who had positive results at each stage of treatment.
Almost half the markedly improved patients had positive reac-

tions after only three treatments, and all had positive reactions
after seven to nine treatments. In the unimproved cases, on the
other hand, the number of positive reactions was small and there
was no consistent increase during the course of treatment. Again,
the moderately improved group tends to fall between the other two.
Fig:

Percentage of positive amobarbital test
reactions occurring in each group at
different stages of treatment.

patients received more than 15 treatments, the
data are not presented beyond this point because the number in each
Although some

group became too small for purposes of comparison. Four of the
unimproved patients received more than 20 treatments, with consis-

tently negative amobarbital test results. One of the moderately
improved patients received over 30 treatments, with only an
occasionally positive reaction.

�-8-

variations in
the persistence of positive reactions from week to week. With at
least two consecutive positives as the criterion of persistence,
0.

Duration of Positive Reactions:

There were

nine of the markedly improved, two of the moderately improved, and
only one of the unimproved group showed persistent positives. After
the termination of treatment all patients but one had negative
amobarbital reactions nine days after the last convulsion. The
remaining patient developed a negative test during the second week

after treatment.
Factor of Age: Since the patients in the markedly improved
group tended to be older persons suffering from depressive reactions,
it is conceivable that the difference in amobarbital test results
D.

related solely to age and only coincidentally to clinical
improvement. Underlying this is the assumption that the older
person is more likely to show signs of altered brain function when
given electroshock. In Table 2 the mean age for each group is shown.
It is apparent that the first two groups were older than the

may

be

patients. Yet, while the mean age of the moderately
patients is slightly higher than that of the markedly
group, these patients still had significantly fewer positive

unimproved
improved
improved

reactions.
the number of positive reactions during treatment is
for each group when the analysis is limited to patients more

In Table
shown

3

years of age. In this Table the relationship of positive
reactions in the different groups remains unchanged from that when
than

hO

�-9the groups are considered as a whole.
OTHER

ASPECTS OF BEHAVIOR

Apart from explicit denial of illness and disorientation, there
were changes in behavior that occurred both under the influence of
the drug and clinically during the course of treatment in signifi—

cantly progressive fashion in those patients who improved. These
aspects may be divided into verbal and nonverbal communication.
A.
Changes in Verbal Language: These changes consisted of
denial expressed in evasion, in negative expressions, and in the
use of a syntactical pattern involving the third and second persons.

patients gave such answers as "It's
hard to say", or "I forgot", or "I don't know; I've been waiting
for the doctors to tell me." The change in syntactical pattern is

When

asked about

illustrated

their

symptoms,

"It's

they call a depression",
or "I'm afraid somebody will get hurt", or answering the question
"What is your main trouble?" with "What is your main trouble?"
by such remarks as

what

patients would talk of a relative who was sick.
In patients who improved there was a notable development of such
patterns in a nondrug interview. One such patient, for example when
asked prior to the start of treatment what his main trouble was,
said, "I’m depressed." After two treatments he answered the question with "I don't get along well with my mother-in-law." After
five treatments he said, "I don't get what you mean"; after eight,
"I get sick; that's all I know." After 10 treatments he said, "Right
now, it's that I don’t see my wife," and after 11 treatments he said,
Sometimes

�-10"In what way do you mean?" and "I

don't

know how

to explain

it."

termination of treatment, his main trouble was given as "I
want to get home", followed by an account of how "good" his wife
At the

was.

the other hand, the increased use
of these language patterns did not occur. They were not present in
In the unimproved group,

some and were

on

minimally or inconsistently noted in others.

In some

patients there were actually fewer such language
patterns under the effects of the drug than there had been in the
of the unimproved

preamobarbital interview.
B.

Changes in Nonverbal Behavior:

reactions occurred
frequently in the markedly

Euphoric

in both clinical and drug interviews most
improved group, less often in the moderately improved group, and
least often in the group which were considered unimproved. In the

patient classed as manic, euphoric behavior

present
in his clinical behavior and was not changed by amobarbital.
Changes in sexual behavior appeared during the amobarbital
interviews of four of the markedly improved patients but in only
one patient in each of the other categories. This took the form of
trying to hug or caress the examiner, making remarks with sexual
content, or engaging in masturbatory activity. A patient in the
unimproved group showed this behavior both during pre-drug interviews and under the influence of amobarbital.
unimproved

Withdrawal or
markedly improved

"selective inattention"

was

was shown by

patients, particularly during the

9

of the

ll

drug phase of the

�amobarbital interview. This behavior consisted of failure to answer
the questions about illness and hospitalization or responding in
dysarthric and cryptic fashion. This reaction under the drug occur—
red only once in each of the other groups. It was of interest that
two

patients in the unimproved category who appeared withdrawn before

the test became more responsive under the influence of the drug.
COMMENT

results of the amobarbital tests in these patients indicate
that there is a relation between clinical improvement and the production of brain damage or an altered state of brain function as
determined by this particular method of examination. In patients
The

who

improve, the amobarbital

test

becomes

consistently positive

early in the course of treatment. In moderately improved or unimproved patients there are fewer positive reactions and their frequency does not increase with more treatments. With other methods
of evaluating brain function such close correlation was not present,

all patients

abnormalities in the electroencephalographic
record and impaired learning was found as frequently in patients
who improved as in those who do not. The significance of this
relationship may be more clearly appreciated by a consideration of
the changes in symbolic function that occur in states of altered
brain function.
It has been useful in studying the behavior of patients with
alterations in brain function to distinguish between defects in the
as

showed

formation of symbol patterns and changes of language patterns which

�-12-

interaction in the environment. In
the first category may be included many types of memory defects,
dyscalculia, topographical disorientation, and aphasia. A patient
with such a memory defect cannot select elements of experience,
classify them into significant units, and arrange them into a temporal pattern. These defects are observed with diffuse cortical
lesions and probably occur universally after shock treatments in
transient fashion. They are, however, related very remotely, if at
all, to therapeutic outcome. Alterations in the mode of interaction
in the environment are exemplified in the various patterns of disorientation and denial and in the amnesias that are noted with
lesions of the diffuse projection systems, in chronic barbiturate
intoxication, and following electroshock convulsions. Here there
is no defect in memory, awareness, or perception as such, but the
patient selects or rejects certain aspects of the environment for
the expression of his own motivations. In disorientation for place,
for example, the misnaming and mislocating of the hospital serve as
symbolic representations of the patient's feelings about his incapindicate

abilities

shift in the

a

and problems

be well and go home.

mode of

as the manifestation of his need to
not that the patient is unaware of his

-- often

It is

is in an absolute sense. He
of the hospital and expresses "aware-

problems and does not know where he
commonly "remembers"

ness" of his
unawareness

the name

difficulties in other contexts of language. The
is, rather, of the far greater degree to which he is

expressing his

own

motivations in his perception of the temporal,

�-13-

aspects of the environment.
In considering what constitutes therapeutic improvement, it is
evident that the evaluation that is commonly made by a hospital

spatial, personal,

and somatic

the particular types of symbolic
adaptation and defensive operations that are used. If the patient
denies that he has any problems or that he is troubled by them, or
if he cannot recall any, he is rated as improved. Such patients
characteristically appear affable and uncomplaining, their manner
reinforced by cliches and banalities, themselves adaptive forms of

staff

large part

depends in

on

that general
memory impairment does not persist after electroshock but that there
is a selective "forgetting" of traumatic material in the patient's
life. This does not mean that he has developed a better understand—
ing of his interpersonal relationships or has acquired "insight“.
The observation is also significant in explaining why, although
electroshock may have a short-term beneficial effect, evaluation of
long-term results shows little difference between treated and untreated cases. Also, the fact that therapeutic improvement did not
result in patients with negative amobarbital tests suggests that
methods of administering electroshock by minimally affecting brain
function, such as a unilateral seizure, will not prove generally
efficacious. From the immediately practical standpoint, the amobarbital test given after the third or fourth treatment may be of
language.

Many

studies (8,9,10,11,12) have

shown

prognostic value.
The

amobarbital

test is

not in

itself

a

direct index of brain

�-114-

in that it measures some particular modality of dysfunction
or brings out a specific defect. Rather, under the conditions in
which it is given, one deduces impaired neural function by reason
of the change in the organization or pattern of language in which
the patient expresses himself. A positive result requires not only
damage

certain degree and type of impairment of brain function exist
but that the patient employ verbal denial and disorientation as
adaptive mechanisms. It would be expected that among patients with
equivalent degrees of brain damage the highest incidence of positive
that

a

amobarbital tests would occur among those who characteristically use
denial as an adaptive mechanism in stress.
In relating these findings to the mode of action of electroshock and other somatic therapies, several considerations seem of
importance. There is a combination of an added stress and a change
in brain function. The milieu of brain function determines the

pattern or organization of the adaptive behavior which can be most
clearly formulated in terms of language. These include not only
verbal patterns of denial and disorientation, elicited with the aid
of the drug, but changes in syntactical patterns indicative of an
altered relationship of the self in the environment. There were
also indications that in the improved patients there were more

all

types of symbolic adaptation, nonverbal as well as
verbal. Thus, a patient who appeared withdrawn both in the predrug
and in the drug interview had a poorer prognosis than the patient
The
who became withdrawn only under the effects of the drug.
changes in

�-15-

patient

who showed

altered sexual behavior under the effects of the

drug had also exhibited

this behavior during the clinical question-

ing as well and did not improve with treatment, whereas the four
patients manifesting sexual behavior only under effects of the drug
did improve. It is likely that the faculty of changing symbolic

patterns regardless of content is

a

factor in therapeutic improve-

ment.
SUMMARY

patients referred consecutively for electroshock
treatment were given amobarbital (Amytal) tests before and at
regular intervals during and following the course of treatment.
There was a close relationship between the short-term response
Twenty-four

to treatment and the results of the amobarbital

tests.

The much

patients showed early, persistent, and increasingly positive reactions during the course of treatment. Unimproved patients
showed no positive reactions, or showed them infrequently and inconsistently. An intermediate group, who showed moderate clinical
improvement, showed more positive reactions than the unimproved
group but fell far short of the much improved group in the incidence
of positive reactions.
Changes in language and nonverbal forms of behavior related to
denial were most consistent and pronounced in the improved group,
improved

interviews not employing drugs.
These observations indicate that clinical improvement in elec—
troshock requires the creation of conditions of altered brain function in which new patterns of symbolic adaptation can be maintained.
even in

�TABLE 1

Distribution of Positive Amobarbital Tests
During Treatment

No. of

Tests

Given During

Markedly improved

Moderately improved
Unimproved

(7)

(11)
(6)

No.

%

Treatment

Positive

Positive

50

38

76

39

15

38

hS

6

13

�TABLE 2

Relationship of Clinical Improvement
To Age

Mean

Agez Yr.

Markedly improved

Moderately improved
Unimproved

(7)

(11)
(6)

h7.6h
50.00
35.29

�TABLE 3

Distribution of Positive Amobarbital Tests
in Patients More Than ho Years of Age

No. of

Tests

Given During

Markedly improved
Moderately improved
Unimproved

(3)

(10)
(5)

No.

%

Treatment

Positive

Positive

h6

35

76

3h

15

hS

17

�REFERENCES

1.

Gordon, H.L.:

Fifty

Shock Therapy Theories, Mil. Surgeon,

192: 397, 19h8.
Kalinowsky, L.B., and Koch, P.H.: Shock Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other Somatic Treatment in Psychiatry, Ed. 2, New York,
Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952.
2.

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic
and Physiological Aspects, Springfield, I11., Charles C. Thomas,
3.

Publisher, 1955.
Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, L.:
Diagnostic Use of Amobarbital Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am.
h.

J.

Psychiat., 112: 889-89u, 1953.
Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, 5.: Serial Administration of "Amytal Test" for Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and
Prognostic Value, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 11: 217-226,
S.

195k.

Weinstein, E.A. and Malitz, 3.: Changes in Symbolic Ex—
pression with Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Sodium"), Am. J. Psychiat.,
6.

lll=

198-206, 195h.
7.

Kahn,

R.L., Fink,

M.

and Weinstein, E.A.:

The "Amytal

Test"

in Patients with Mental Illness, J. Hillside Hosp., Q: 3-13, 1955.
8. Carter, J.T.: Type of Personal Life Memories Forgotten
Following Electra-Convulsive Therapy, Am. Psychologist, g: 330, 1953.
9. Janis, I.L.: Psychologic Effects of Electric Convulsive
Treatments: I. Post-Treatment Amnesias, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis., 111:
359, 1950.

�-210.

Korngold, M.:

An

Investigation of

Some

Psychological

Effects of Electric Shock Treatment, Am. Psychol., g: 381-382, 1953.
11. Teicher, A.: The Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy on
the Visual Reactions of Schizophrenic Patients,

Am.

Pszchol.,

hhS, 1953.

12.

Person,

Alexander, L.:
Am.

J. Psychiat.,

Effect of Electroshock
109: 696-698, 1953.

on a "Normal"

Q:

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
July 1956, Vol. 76, pp. 23—29
Copyright 1956, by American, Medical Association

lee/whorl

.725!
to
o/ﬂmoéaréita/

C/inica/

E/ectrodhocé
jm/orouement in
ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.
MAX FlNK. M.D.. Glen Oaks. N. Y.

and
EDWIN A. WEINSTEIN. M.D.. Bethesda. Md.
lllllllllll|l||[|[|IllllllllllIlllllllllllllll|IIIlIllIlllllllIlllIll|||l||llIll||l|lllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllU

While many theories about the mode of
action of electroshock therapy have been
offered, the relationship among neurophy—
siological and psychological factors remains
poorly understood.* Although changes in
brain function may be demonstrated on electrical recording, such evidence of impaired
function has not been correlated with the
degree of psychiatric improvement. Similarly, although memory defects and impaired
learning ability are common manifestations
following the administration of electrically
induced convulsions, their severity is not an
index of therapeutic outcome. It would apclinical
of
results
the
that
ordinary
pear
and laboratory procedures and psychological tests do not furnish adequate criteria
for a correlation of the alterations of be—
havior with the changes in brain function.
3
it has been suggested
studies
In previous
that the therapeutic action of electroshock
therapy was related to the production of a
milieu of brain dysfunction in which denial
of illness (anosognosia) might occur. A
concept of anosognosia was advanced which
included not only denial of hemiplegia and
Submitted for publication Feb. 23, 1956.

Hillside Hospital (Drs. Kahn and Fink).
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Dr.
Weinstein).
This investigation was supported in part by the

Medical Research and Development Board, Ofﬁce
of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army,
under Contract No. DA—49—007—MD—376; and grant
M-927 from the National Institute of Mental
Health of the National Institutes of Healthy U. S.
Public Health Service.
*

References 1-2.

blindness but denial of many other aspects
of illness and problems of living. It was
indicated that anosognosia was not explicable as a focal deﬁcit but was, rather, a
manifestation of a reorganization of perceptual symbolic function in which the patient
represented his problems in an altered lan—
guage pattern. In the verbal sphere these
language patterns included explicit denial,
disorientation for place and time, reduplica—
tion (reduplicative paramnesia), paraphasia,
and confabulation. The patient’s feelings
about his illness and incapacities could also
be manifested in nonverbal aspects of behavior, such as selective withdrawal, inat—
tention, and muteness (akinetic mutism).
altered sexual behavior, and euphoric, manic
states. The particular form of symbolic
adaptation that was used was closely related
to features of the premorbid personality.
These changes in behavior were found
commonly with inﬁltrating neoplasms, with
acute vascular lesions, particularly when
associated with subarachnoid bleeding, and
following lacerating brain injury. The elec—
troencephalographic records showed diffuse
slow—wave rhythms, and it appeared that
the lesions affected the diffuse projection
systems rather than any speciﬁc discrete
projection area. Similar forms of behavior
may appear after the operation of prefrontal
lobotomy and, in more transitory form, after
the administration of electroshock convul—
sions. When the degree of brain damage
was insufﬁcient to permit the elicitation of
explicit denial and disorientation on ordi—
nary clinical examination, these phenomena
might be observed when the patient was in—
terviewed after the intravenous administra—
tion of amobarbital (Amytal) sodium. This

�observation furnished the basis for the
“Amytal test” for brain damage, in which
the persistence of certain patterns of denial
and disorientation are considered as evi—
dence of impaired function.T
It was reported that in some patients
receiving electroshock treatment for intractable pain, the amobarbital test, which was
previously negative, became positive after
a number of convulsions. Others received
as many as 18 shocks without change in the
results of the amobarbital test. It was noted
that in patients who gained relief from
their complaints of pain, the amobarbital
tests became positive, whereas in those pa—
tients who continued to complain of pain
the amobarbital tests remained negative. The
purpose of the present paper is to determine
the relationship between the clinical response to electroshock treatment and the
results of the amobarbital test in patients
hospitalized for psychiatric illness.

Method
Each patient was given a series of amobarbital
tests. In this test, the patient is asked a standard
group of questions pertaining to orientation and
the awareness of illness. The drug is then administered intravenously in a 0.5% solution at a
rate of 0.05 gm. (1 cc.) per minute until nystagmus, slurred speech, drowsiness, and errors in
counting backward are noted. The same questions
are then repeated. The following changes, when
persistent, are called “positive” and are deemed
indicative of cerebral dysfunction.
1. Complete denial of illness
2. Denial of major aspects of illness, such as
attributing entry into hospital to a trivial or
past illness
3. Misnaming the hospital, either its proper name
or in terms of some euphemism, such as “rest
home”
4. Displacement of the location of the hospital.
such as to another city
5-"

6.

7.

8.
9.
1'

Confabulated journey
Reduplication of the hospital, such as the
patient’s stating that he is in another hospital
of the same or similar name
Disorientation for time of day with confusion
of day and night
Gross misidentiﬁcation of the examiner, such
as calling him a “lawyer” or an “entertainer”
Disorientation for year

References 4-7.

The patient was given his ﬁrst test prior to
treatment and was retested at weekly intervals.
All patients in the series had negative amobarbital
tests prior to the initiation of therapy. Treatments
were administered three times a week, so that the
patients were generally tested after every third
treatment. A test was given two days after a
treatment and was continued at weekly in—
tervals after the termination of therapy until the
result had become negative.
Electroencephalographic records and standard
tests of memory and learning ability were also
given, but will not be considered in detail in this
paper.

Population
T wenty-four patients at Hillside Hospital receiving electroshock with the Reiter Electrostimulator were studied. The patients were not selected
by us but were taken on the basis of consecutive
referrals by the clinical staff. Some patients were
necessarily excluded because their treatment was
terminated or interrupted before they were ade—
quately studied. Another patient was omitted because he had manifestations of brain disease and
a positive amobarbital test prior to electroconvulsive
therapy. The number of treatments varied from 9
to 33. Patients who showed clinical improvement
tended to receive fewer treatments. Some of this
variability could also be ascribed to differences in
the inclination of the resident psychiatrists to use
this form of treatment. One patient decided for
himself that he had had enough treatment and
eloped.
Diagnostically, the patients consisted
of 14 with depressive reactions, 9 with schizophrenia, and l with a manic reaction. There were
15 women and 9 men, and the ages ranged from
24 to 68, with a median of 47 years.
Evaluation of Response to Electroshock Therapy.
——All patients were observed for at least eight
weeks after completion of treatment. Determina—
tion of the patient’s response to electroshock was
made on the basis of the resident psychiatrist’s im—
pression, staff opinion, the nurses’ notes, and the
clinical evaluation of one of us (M. F.), who
supervised the treatments but was not aware of
the amobarbital test results. On this basis the
patients were divided into three groups.
A. Markedly Improved: The 11 cases in this
group were regarded as showing recovery or
marked improvement. These patients no longer
showed the symptoms which brought them into
the hospital; their doctors felt they were better,
and the nurses noted them as being able to sleep
Without medication, eating better, getting along
with the other patients, and participating in hospital activities.
B. Moderately Improved: The six patients in
this group showed some improvement but con~

�tinued to manifest indications of mental illness.
These patients typically showed symptomatic relief; i.e., acute depressive features might be gone,
but the dramatic change, so evident in the ﬁrst
group, was not apparent. Each patient continued
to show some noticeable disturbance, such as ob—
sessional thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic
preoccupation.
C. Minimally Improved or Unimproved: In this
group was placed seven patients in whom change
was not clearly noticeable or who showed only
equivocal or transient improvement. Some showed
ﬂuctuations in behavior, at times appearing some—
what improved. But the change was not sustained,
so that by the end of treatment they appeared
much as they did before.
\Ve are aware of the difﬁculties in evaluating
improvement. Others may have differed in the
estimates of changes in these patients. In any
case, by using this threefold classiﬁcation, the
differences between the ﬁrst and the third group
will be distinct.

TABLE

Markedly improved (11)-__
Moderately improved (6)-Unimproved (7)____________

Treatment
50
39
45

Amobarbital

No.
%
Positive Positive
38

15.93
6

.4,

76
38
13

treatments, and all had positive reactions
after seven to nine treatments. In the unim-proved cases, on the other hand, the number
of positive reactions was small and there
was no consistent increase during the course
of treatment. Again, the moderately improved group tends to fall between the
other two.
IOO

90
80

Observations

._

MUCH IMPROVEDUI)

----

UNIMPROVEDU)

.\/

'-—MOD.IMPROVED(6)

70
AMYTAL

A. Distribution of Positive Reactions.—

group, with the moderately improved pa—
tients between these groups. Every
markedly improved patient had at least
one positive amobarbital reaction during
treatment. On the other hand, one of the
moderately improved patients and ﬁve
of the unimproved patients never showed
a positive result. A comparison of the
results in each group, using the X2 test,
is statistically signiﬁcant at better than the
1% level of conﬁdence.
B. Positive Reactions at Each Stage of
Treatment—In the Figure the groups are
compared for the percentage of patients in
each group who had positive results at each
stage of treatment.
Almost half the markedly improved pa—
tients had positive reactions after only three

Tests During Treatment
No. of Tests
Given During

REACTIONS

The number of amobarbital tests given to
each patient during the course of electroshock range-d from 3 to 13, depending on
how long treatment was maintained. In
Table 1 the data are shown for the number
of tests given during treatment and the
number and percentage positive for all the
patients in each group. The markedly im—
proved patients showed many more positive reactions than the unimproved

of Positive

l.——Distribution

60
50

POSITIVE

4O
3O

20
PERCENTAGE

5
4-6
NUM BER

7-9

lO-IZ

I3-I5

0F TREATMENTS

Percentage of positive amobarbital test reactions
occurring in each group at different stages of treat—

ment.

Although some patients received more
than 15 treatments, the data are not pre—
sented beyond this point because the number
in each group became too small for purposes
of comparison. Four of the unimproved pa—
tients received more than 20 treatments,
with consistently negative amobarbital test
results. One of the moderately improved
patients received over 30 treatments, with
only an occasionally positive reaction.
C. Duration of Positive Reactions.—
There were variations in the persistence of
positive reactiOns from week to week. With
at least two consecutive positives as the
criterion of persistence, nine of the mark—
edly improved, two of the moderately im—
proved, and only one of the unimproved
group showed persistent positives. After

�the termination of treatment all patients but
one had negative amobarbital reactions nine
days after the last convulsion. The remaining patient developed a negative test during
the second week after treatment.
D. Factor of Age—Since the patients
in the markedly improved group tended
to be older persons suffering from depres—
sive reactions, it is conceivable that the
difference in amobarbital test results may
be related solely to age and only coincidentally to clinical improvement. Underlying
this is the assumption that the older person
is more likely to show signs of altered brain
function when given electroshock. In Table
2 the mean age for each group is shown.
TABLE 2.——Relationship of Clinical Improvemen

To Age

Markedly improved (11)_______-____-___-___________
Moderately improved (6) ___________________________
Unimproved (7) ____________________________________

Mean
Age, Yr.
47.64

gggg

it is apparent that the ﬁrst two groups
were older than the unimproved patients.
Yet, while the mean age of the moderately
improved patients is slightly higher than
that of the markedly improved group, these
patients still had signiﬁcantly fewer positive
reactions.
In Table 3 the number of positive re—
actions during treatment is shown for each
is
limited to pa—
when
the
analysis
group
tients more than 40 years of age. In this
Table the relationship of positive reactions
in the different groups remains unchanged
from that when the groups are considered
as a whole.

Other Aspects of Behavior
Apart from explicit denial of illness and
disorientation, there were changes in be—
havior that occurred both under the in-ﬂuence of the drug and clinically during the
course of treatment in signiﬁcantly progres—
sive fashion in those patients who improved.
These aspects may be divided into verbal
and nonverbal communication.

A. Changes in Verbal Language—These
changes consisted of denial expressed in
evasion, in negative expressions, and in

the use of a syntactical pattern involving
the third and second persons. When asked
about their symptoms, patients gave such
answers as “It’s hard to say,” or “I forgot,”
or “I don’t know; I’ve been waiting for the
doctors to tell me.” The change in syntactical pattern is illustrated by such remarks
Amobarbital
Tests in Patients More Than 40 Years of Age

TABLE

3.——Distribution of Positive

No. of Tests
Given During

Markedly improved (10)--Moderately improved (5)-Unimproved (3) ____________
_

Treatment
46
34
17

N0.
%
Positive Positive
35

15

0

76
45
0

as “It’s what they call a depression,” or “I’m
afraid somebody will get hurt,” or answering
the question “What is your main trouble P"
with “What is your main trouble?” Sometimes patients would talk of a relative who
was sick.
In patients who improved there was a
notable development of such patterns in a
nondrug interview. One such patient, for
example, when asked prior to the start of
treatment what his main trouble was, said,
“I’m depressed.” After two treatments he
answered the question with “I don’t get
along well with my mother-in—law.” After
ﬁve treatments he said, “I don’t get what
you mean": after eight, “I get sick; that’s
all I know.” After 10 treatments he said,
“Right now, it’s that I don’t see my Wife,”
and after 11 treatments he said, “In what
way do you mean?” and “I don’t know
how to explain it.” At the termination of
treatment, his main trouble was given as
“I want to get home,” followed by an account of how “good” his wife was.
In the unimproved group, on the other
hand, the increased use of these language
patterns did not occur. They were not
present in some and were minimally or
inconsistently noted in others. In some of
the unimproved patients there were actually
fewer such language patterns under the

�i

L’

effects of the drug than there had been in
the preamobarbital interview.
B. Changes in Nonverbal Behavior.—
Euphoric reactions occurred in both

sistently positive early in the course of
treatment. In moderately improved or
unimproved patients there are fewer positive reactions and their frequency does
clinical and drug interviews most fre— not increase with more treatments. With
quently in the markedly improved other methods of evaluating brain func—
group, less often in the moderately im— tion such close correlation was not presproved group, and least often in the ent, as all patients showed abnormalities
group which were considered unim— in the e1ectroencephalographic record and
proved. In the unimproved patient impaired learning was found as fre—
classed as manic, euphoric behavior was quently in patients who improved as in
present in his clinical behavior and was those who do not. The signiﬁcance of
this relationship may be more clearly
not changed by amobarbital.
Changes in sexual behavior appeared appreciated by a consideration of the
during the amobarbital interviews of four changes in symbolic function that occur
of the markedly improved patients but in states of altered brain function.
in only one patient in each of the other
It has been useful in studying the becategories. This took the form of try— havior of patients with alterations in
ing to hug or caress the examiner. mak— brain function to distinguish between
ing remarks with sexual content, or en— defects in the formation of symbol pat—
gaging in masturbatory activity. A terns and changes of language patterns
patient in the unimproved group showed which indicate a shift in the mode of
this behavior both during pre—drug inter- interaction in the
environment. In the
views and under the inﬂuence of amobar— ﬁrst
be included many
category
may
bital.
types of memory defects, dyscalculia,
Withdrawal or “selective inattention” topographical disorientation, and aphasia.
was shown by 9‘ of the 11 markedly im; A patient with such a
defect
memory
proved patients. particularly during the cannot select elements of
experience,
drug phase of the amobarbital interview. classify them into
and
signiﬁcant
units,
This behavior consisted of failure to an—
them
into
a
temporal
arrange
pattern.
hos—
the
about
illness and
questions
swer
These defects are observed with diffuse
pitalization or responding in dysarthric cortical lesions and
uni—
probably
occur
and cryptic fashion. This reaction under
versally after shock treatments in tran—
the drug occurred only once in each of
sient fashion. They are, however, related
the other groups. It was of interest that
if at all, to therapeutic
remotely,
very
two patients in the unimproved category
in the mode of inAlterations
outcome.
who appeared withdrawn before the test
teraction in the environment

became more responsive under
ﬂuence of the drug.

the in-

Comment
The results of the amobarbital tests in
these patients indicate that there is a
relation between clinical improvement
and the production of brain damage or
an altered state of brain function as de—
termined by this particular method of
examination. In patients who improve,
the amobarbital test becomes con—

are exempliﬁed in the various patterns of disorientation and denial and in the amnesias
that are noted with lesions of the diffuse
projection systems, in chronic barbiturate
intoxication, and following electroshock
convulsions. Here there is no defect in
memory, awareness, or perception as
such, but the patient selects or rejects
certain aspects of the environment for
the expression of his own motivations.
ln disorientation for place, for example,
the misnaming and mislocating of the

�hospital serve as, symbolic representa—
tions of the patient’s feelings about his
incapabilities and problems—often as the
manifestation of his need to be well and
go home. It is not that the patient is
unaware of his problems and does not
know where he is in an absolute sense.
He commonly “remembers” the name of
the hospital and expresses “awareness”
of his difﬁculties in other contexts of
language. The unawareness is, rather, of
the far greater degree to which he is
expressing his own motivations in his
perception of the temporal. spatial, personal, and somatic aspects of the en—
Vironment.
In considering what constitutes thera—
peutic improvement, it is evident that
the evaluation that is commonly made
by a hospital staff depends in large part
on the particular types of symbolic
adaptation and defensive operations that
are used. If the patient denies that he
has any problems or that he is troubled
by them, or if he cannot recall any, he
is rated as improved. Such patients char—
acteristically appear affable and uncom—
plaining, their manner reinforced by
clichés and banalities, themselves adap—
tive forms of language. Many studies:
have shown that general memory impairment does not persist after electroshock
but that there is a selective “forgetting”
of traumatic material in the patient’s
life. This does not mean that he has
developed a better understanding of his
interpersonal relationships or has ac—
quired “insight.” The observation is also
signiﬁcant in explaining why, although

electroshock may have a short—term bene—
ﬁcial effect, evaluation of long—term results shows little difference between
treated and untreated cases. Also, the
fact that therapeutic improvement did
not result in patients with negative

amobarbital tests suggests that methods
of administering electroshock by minimally affecting brain function, Such as

i References

8-12.

a unilateral seizure, will not prove gen—
erally efﬁcacious. From the immediately

practical standpoint, the amobarbital
test given after the third or fourth treat—
ment may be of prognostic value.
The amobarbital test is not in itself a
direct index of brain damage in that it
measures some particular modality of
dysfunction or brings out a speciﬁc defect. Rather, under the conditions in
which it is given, one deduces impaired
neural function by reason of the change
in the organization or pattern of language in which the patient expresses
himself. A positive result requires not
only that a certain degree and type of
impairment of brain function exist but
that the patient employ verbal denial and
disorientation as adaptive mechanisms.
It would be expected that among patients with equivalent degrees of brain
damage the highest incidence of positive
amobarbital tests would occur among
those who characteristically use denial
as an adaptive mechanism in stress.
In relating these ﬁndings to the mode

of action of electroshock and other somatic
therapies, several considerations seem of
importance. There is a combination of an
added stress and a change in brain function. The milieu of brain function determines the pattern or organization of the
adaptive behavior which can be most clearly
formulated in terms of language. These include not only verbal patterns of denial and
disorientation, elicited with the aid of the
drug, but changes in syntactical patterns indicative of an altered relationship of the
self in the environment. There were also
indications that in the improved patients
there were more changes in all types of
symbolic adaptation, nonverbal as well
as verbal. Thus, a patient who appeared
withdrawn both in the predrug and in
the drug interview had a poorer prog—
nosis than the patient who became withdrawn only under the effects of the drug.
The patient who showed altered sexual
behavior under the effects of the drug
had also exhibited this behavior during

�the clinical questioning as well and did not
improve with treatment, whereas the four
patients manifesting sexual behavior only
under effects of the drug did improve. It
is likely that the faculty of changing sym—
bolic patterns regardless of content is a factor in therapeutic improvement.

REFERENCES
Gordon, H. L.: Fifty Shock Therapy
ories, Mil. Surgeon 103 2397, 1948.
1.

The—

2.

Kalinowsky, L. B., and Hoch, P. H.: Shock
Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other Somatic
Treatment in Psychiatry, Ed. 2, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952.

Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial
of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects,
Springﬁeld, Ill, Charles C Thomas, Publisher,
3.

Summary
Twenty—four patients referred consecu—
tively for electroshock treatment were
given amobarbital (Amytal) tests before
and at regular intervals during and fol—
lowing the course of treatment.
There was a close relationship between
the short—term response to treatment
and the results of the amobarbital tests.
The much improved patients showed
early, persistent, and increasingly positive reactions during the course of treat—
ment. Unimproved patients showed no
positive reactions, or showed them in—
frequently and inconsistently. An inter—
mediate group, who showed moderate
clinical improvement, showed more posi—
tive reactions than the unimproved group
but fell far short of the much improved
group in the incidence of positive re—
actions.
Changes in language and nonverbal
forms of behavior related to denial were
most consistent and pronounced in the
improved group, even in interviews not
employing drugs.

These observations indicate that clinical
improvement in electroshock requires
the creation of conditions of altered brain
function in which new patterns of
symbolic adaptation can be maintained.

1955.

Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L.; Sugarman,
L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic Use of Amobarbi—
tal Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am. J.
Psychiat. 112:889-894, 1953.
4.

Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L., and Malitz,
5.: Serial Administration of “Amytal Test” for
Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and Prognostic
Value, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 71 1217—
5.

226, 1954.

\Neinstein, E. A., and Malitz, 8.: Changes
in Symbolic Expression with Amobarbital Sodium
(“Amytal Sodium”), Am. J. Psychiat. 111:198-206,
6.

1954.

Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
The “Amytal Test” in Patients with Mental Ill—
ness, J. Hillside Hosp. 4:3-13, 1955.
7.

Carter, J. T.: Type of Personal Life Memo«
ries Forgotten Following Electro—Convulsive
Therapy. Am. Psychologist 8 :330, 1953.
8.

Janis, I. L.: Psychologic Effects of Electric
Convulsive Treatments: I. Post—Treatment Am—
nesias, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 111:359, 1950.
9.

Korngold, M.: An Investigation of Some
Psychological Effects of Electric Shock Treat—
ment, Am. Psychol. 8:381—382, 1953.
10.

Teicher, A.: The Effect of Electroconvulsive
Therapy on the Visual Reactions of Schizophrenic
Patients, Am. Psychol. 8:445, 1953.
11.

Alexander, L.: Effect of Electroshock on a
“Normal” Person, Am. J. Psychiat. 109:696—698,
12.

1953.

Printed and Published in the United States of Amerira

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2434">
                <text>Relation of amobarbital test to clinical improvement in electroshock. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1956 Jul; 76(1): 23-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2435">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2436">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-17-021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2437">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2438">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Weinstein, Edwin A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2439">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2440">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2441">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry July 1956, Vol. 76, pp. 23—29.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2442">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2443">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74446">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81007">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87568">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94129">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="246" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="37">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/83ffbada2aade577e8a98ad3651523e9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>fc1b31ed52223d2b16d46a30284791a4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100663">
                    <text>Borderland of Neurology —

BASEL (Schweiz)

Conﬁnia Neurologica
Grenzgebiete der Neurologie - Les Conﬁus de la Neurologie
Editor: E. A. SPIEGEL
S.

KARGER

NEW YORK

Separatum Vol. 16, No. 2/3 (1956)
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Electroshock Research Association
Atlantic City, New Jersey, May 8, 1955
Karin, H., M. Fink and S. Kwalwasser: Conﬁn. neurol. 16, 88, 1956

Printed in Switzerland

From the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York

Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to
Improvement in Electroshock 1'
**
Max
FINK
*,
KORIN
By Hyman
and Simon KWALWASSER ***

Read by title. This investigation was supported in part by a research grant
M-927 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Public Health Service.
Received the annual $ 100 prize awarded by the Electroshock Research Association.
* Research Assistant (psychology).
** Director of Research.
*** Associate Medical Director.
T

�In the course of studies of the relation between altered brain function and improvement following electroshock therapy, the present
investigation of memory functions was undertaken. By serial testing
of learning and recall variables, an attempt is made ﬁrst to study and
quantify memory changes; and then to determine the relationship
between therapeutic outcome and such changes.
Amnestic effects during electroshock therapy are commonly observed, and are both of practical and theoretical interest. Although

differences in methodology, materials, subjects and electroconvulsive
techniques make direct comparison difﬁcult, a few conclusions related
to the questions of concern in this study can be derived from published

investigations.
The majority of investigators state that no signiﬁcant memory loss
or other intellectual impairment remains two or three weeks after
treatment 1—4. One study 5, however, noted that 5 patients, otherwise
fully recovered, reported defects affecting long familiar names of
6
and
Zubin
places,
found no indication
lasting a year or more.
persons

�Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser

89

that electroshock destroyed memory traces, and concluded that where
memory loss persists, the progress is one of slow recovery rather than

obliteration.
In studies of personal memories selective circumscribed amnesias
at least four and ﬁve weeks after therapy are described for material
elicited in pretreatment interviews 7' 8. The amnesias, however, are
construed as due to subtle emotional factors, rather than permanent
8
memory loss. From such observations, Janis postulates that memory
impairment facilitates repressions and thereby reduces affective
disturbances.
Regarding the question of memory impairment as a prerequisite
for improvement, Wilcox 9 notes that three techniques of electroconvulsive therapy, namely, the “organic shock”, the “standard” or
Cerletti and the “brain-facilitation” techniques, are based on concepts which attribute varying degrees of importance to amnestic
change. Studies based on the “brain-facilitation” technique where
the low current type Reiter and “brief-stimulus” electrostimulators
are used, emphasize the diminished memory change induced as compared to the “standard technique”, although reported therapeutic
results are analogous 1°. Hoch and Kalinowsky 11, believe the “standard” technique to be the most effective therapeutically; and numerous clinicians using the “organic-shock” method hold that a
12.
is
for
of
electroshock
essential
success
therapeutic
regressive type
13
Wilcox
of
In a speciﬁc study
this problem,
recently found no relation between improvement and either the treatment induced confusion seen immediately following an initial Reiter electroshock, or
after a series of ten electroshocks.
Method and Materials
The subjects are 40 consecutive patients referred for electroshock treatment and
21 untreated controls at Hillside Hospital. The clinical diagnosis in the electroshock
patients include involutional depression, 7; manic depressive psychosis, 18; reactive depression, 4; paranoid schizophrenia, 3; catatonic schizophrenia, 5 and
hebephrenic schizophrenia, 3. The depressed patients tend to be older — between
40 and 68 years of age; the schizophrenic patients are younger, between 24 and
40 years. For the untreated group, patients designated as possible electroshock
candidates were selected. They are a representative sample of the electroshock
group matched proportionately with respect to diagnosis, age, education and
previous electroshock treatment.
The Reiter CW 47 C electrostimulator was used in all cases. Treatment was
administered on alternate days 3X per week, and was reduced after the second
week depending on the clinical condition of the patient.
8

Conﬁnia Neurologica, Vol. 16, No. 2/3 (1956)

�90

Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

Methodologically, the study involves a test of the ability of patients to recall an
original learning of lists of eight, three letter common words, at weekly intervals
under two conditions: (a) immediately after an interpolated learning of a list of
nonsense syllables; (b) after a ten minute rest period during which a copy of “Life”
magazine is read.
The choice of testing method and materials was based on studies in retroactive
inhibition which indicate that the degree of retention of a learning task varies with
the type of activity interposed between an original learning and the later measurement of retention. Thus, by interpolating nonsense syllables and the reading of a
magazine on separate test days each week, two indicators of recall function of
varying sensitivity are obtained.
In the test procedure lists of common words and nonsense syllables are arranged
according to established experimental procedures respecting successive consonants
and vowels 14. Each list of words was presented manually on ﬂash cards by the
examiner. The time interval of exposure was not deﬁnite during learning and
seldom exceeded ﬁve seconds. For recall, however, 10 seconds was uniformly

permitted.
In the presentation of the lists for the interpolation condition the common words
were presented for a maximum of ten trials; or less if the list was learned earlier.
The list of nonsense syllables was then similarly presented. In the no-interpolation
condition the learning procedure was similar, except that reading “Life” magazine
was substituted for the nonsense syllables. Each condition was tested weekly on
non-electroshock days, alternating between successive treatments.
The control group was tested in the same way, twice weekly for ﬁve weeks, to
simulate the testing for 12 electroshock treatments. Following completion of
treatment, ratings of improvement were determined independently by the supervising psychiatrist on the basis of observations of ward behavior and psychiatric
interviews. The improved patients were those in whom there was a marked change
in behavior, and whose acute symptoms had subsided. In the moderately improved
The
behavior
but
in
persisted.
transient
there
change
symptoms
a
was
group,
unimproved patients were those in whom symptoms persisted or increased and in
whom there was no change in behavior.

Results
(I) Original and Interpolated Learning.
Impairment in learning function occurred during treatment in the
electroshock group. This was seen in the increased mean number of
failures to learn the words and syllables as the number of treatments
increased (Fig. 1). The decrement in learning is maximal in the 4—6
and 7—9 electroshock periods. In the 10—12 treatment period this
decrement in learning ability decreases. This decrease may be the
result of a change in therapy from three to two treatments weekly
in many of the patients. Considerable recovery in learning function
3—4
administered
when
at
day intervals.
treatments are
occurs

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

9].

RELATION OF ERRORS IN LEARNING
TO ELECTROSHOCK TREATMENT

50

\
/
+/_____
n‘
+

0Z

40

2

E 30
Lu
.1

E
U)

(I
O

ELECTROSHOCK GROUP

0—4-

0—0

LEARNING

0F NONSENSE SYLLABLES

LEARNING OF COMMON WORDS

UNTREATE o GROUP

+

o---+

+

0—--o

LEARNING
LEARNING

or Nonsense

POST

POST
TREATMENT
3 WK.

SYLLABLES

or connou wonos

20

O:

5

IO

0
PRE
TREATMENT

I

«3

4 -6

7-9

IO-I2

POST
TREAT—

MENT
I
WK.

TREATMENT
ZWK.

INTERVAL OF TREATMENT

Fig.1

Following termination of therapy, the decrement in learning is
completely reversible, so that the mean errors are signiﬁcantly fewer
than pretreatment. For the untreated group, the errors decreased in
each of the simulated intervals of electroshock (Fig. 1), probably due
to the factor of practice.
These data for original and interpolated learning indicate therefore
that a signiﬁcant decrement is obtained during electroshock which is
reversible after termination of therapy when intra-individual comparisons are made. This observation conﬁrms previous reports 1—4.
(II) Recall-Interpolation and N o-Interpolation.
On tests of recall of learned words after interpolation, the decrement from pretreatment was signiﬁcant at the l per cent level for all
intervals of treatment in the electroshock group. In contrast with the
original and interpolated learning which was ﬁrst signiﬁcantly altered
during the 4—6 treatment period, the recall function was signiﬁcantly
impaired within the 1—-3 interval (Fig. 2).
When evaluations are made of recall of the learned word lists after
reading “Life” magazine (“no-interpolation”), the changes are similar

�92

Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

.

RELATION OF RECALL OF COMMON WORDS
TO ELECTROSHOCK TREATMENT

RECALLED

WORDS

COMMON

a "°__-_

.—a

o——--""°

MEAN

ELECTROSHOCK GROUP

+——+ no INTERPOLATION
o mrenpounou
UNTREATED GROUP

4----+

o---c

PRE
TREATMENT

l-3

4-6

7-9

IO-IZ

POST
TREATMENT
l

WK.

POST
TREATMENT
2 WK.

N0 INTERPOLATION
INTERPOLATION

POST
TREATMENT
3 WK.

INTERVAL OF TREATMENT

Fig. 2

to those obtained for original and interpolated learning. These observations indicate that the type of activity interposed between an
original learning and a later measurement of retention is an important
and useful factor in eliciting subtle changes in function. Post therapy,
the decrement is reversible for both interpolation and no-interpolation
recall.
The foregoing results indicate that a signiﬁcant memory change
occurs within the 1—3 treatment period and that recall following interpolation is a more sensitive measure of change in function than
learning.
(III) Relation of Recall and Learning Responses to Improvement.
In the analysis of individual data for the relation of recall function
to clinical improvement, the scores of 38 patients, treated three times
3
Of
assessed.
week
for
least
weeks,
these, twenty-nine
were
at
per
showed a pattern of decrement in recall function (scores of zero or
below pretreatment). Of the matched controls, four showed the same
pattern of decrement in recall in a similar testing period while seventeen showed no decrement.

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

93

The treated patients were then characterized as to improved,
moderately improved, and unimproved by the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock treatment unit. The number of
subjects in each group are tabulated according to memory loss in
Table 1.
'

TABLE

1

Decrement and No Decrement Groups During Recall Compared
with Respect to Degree of Improvement

Improved
Moderately Improved
Unimproved

Decrement

No Decrement

l2

2

4

1

13

6

To facilitate statistical study the improved and moderately improved groups are combined, and compared with the unimproved
group. A chi square of .22 indicates that no signiﬁcant difference
between these two groups exists. Thus, there is no indication that
clinical improvement is necessarily related to decrement on interpolated recall tests.
Following this analysis for recall, the data for the learning of
common words is similarly evaluated. Of the 38 patients, 26 showed
a pattern of decrement in learning function (number of errors above
pre-treatment), and 13 showed no decrement (errors below pretreatment score). In the control group of 21 subjects, only one subject
was in the decrement range.
When these patients are grouped according to their psychiatric
ratings, there is an apparent relationship between improvement and
decrement in learning (Table 2). This relationship, however, is not
statistically signiﬁcant by the chi square test. It is concluded,
therefore, that no relation exists between clinical improvement and
decrement in the pattern of learning.
The above patterns of response are based primarily on changes
during the 4—6 and 7—9 intervals of treatment. For the majority of
patients, these are points of maximum decrement, and at such times
electroshock therapy was reduced or discontinued. Five patients,
however, were treated three times per week for 18 or more treatments.
Clinical changes during this period were minimal and following

.

�Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

94:

TABLE

2

Comparison of Degree of Decrement During Learning
with Ratings of Improvement
Decrement

+++

++

Improved

7

(44%)

3

Moderately
Improved

2

(40%)

0

Unimproved

4 (24%)

3

No Decrement
—
——

+

(18.5%)

2

(12.5%)

l (20%)
(18.5%)

3

(18.5%)

2

(12.5%)

2

(12.5%)

1

(20%)

1

(20%)

1

(6%)

6

(35%)

termination of therapy, all were rated as unimproved. The learning
patterns in these patients remained at a minimal or no decrement
level throughout. For recall following interpolation, however, these
patients showed a decrement during treatment with scores below
both pretreatment and also post therapy. Thus, these patients did
show evidence of brain dysfunction by the more sensitive recall interpolation variable. Nevertheless, failure to develop changes in the
learning function after relatively prolonged treatment suggests that
improvement is unlikely when there is minimal brain dysfunction.
This interpretation of the data is supported by the ﬁndings of Kahn
and Fink 15 who, in this laboratory, used the electroencephalogram
and Amytal tests 16 as indices of cerebral change, and found a high
correlation between degree of brain dysfunction and improvement.
Discussion

In similar investigations of memory function with lists of words and
syllables, the learning task was completed before therapy and recall
was tested at varying intervals after termination of therapy. In this
study serial measures of change in learning and recall obtained on the
day following treatment are assessed. As group data, they verify the
ﬁndings of other investigators that signiﬁcant decrements in learning
and recall functions occur during electroshock which are reversible
by the third week following termination of therapy.
Recall after interpolation is the most sensitive indicator of dysfunction. For this variable, a signiﬁcant pattern of decrement is
evident in 29 of 38 of the electroshock group. Thus, the majority of
these patients show some quantiﬁable memory change during treat-

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

95

in
the
occurs
impairment
signiﬁcant
a
memory
ment. Furthermore,
24
hours
measurable
is
1—3
which
the
treatments
between
week
ﬁrst
electroReiter
the
is
This
though
EST.
even
true
after the single
stimulator used here is reported to minimize amnestic eﬁ'ects. During
and
second
the
is
during
only
signiﬁcant
the
impairment
learning,
week
7—9
4th
the
In
and
interval).
(4—6
of
weeks
treatment
third
This
of
the
scores.
less
is
learning
there
impairment
(10—12 interval)
of
method
treatment
of
is
artefact
particular
a
an
however,
change,
clinical
favorable
reduced
is
a
as
electroshock
frequency
whereby
7—9 interval, the
the
between
Thus,
becomes
apparent.
response
20
others are on reand
discontinued
is
12
of
patients
treatment
of
the
mefor
peak
most
patients
Nevertheless,
duced treatment.
ninth
and
treatments.
fourth
the
between
reached
is
decrement
mory
time.
this
derived
is
beneﬁt
at
therapeutic
Seemingly, greatest
When the patients categorized according to individual patterns of
their
with
ratings
and
compared
recall
are
both
learning
in
response
of improvement, a relatively high proportion with marked memory
brain
that
dysfunction
This
ﬁnding
fail
suggests
to
improve.
changes
induce
sufﬁcient
is
a
to
recall
and
not
measured
learning
36
by
as
per
Wilcox
her
in
reached
conclusion
A
by
similar
was
effect.
therapeutic
13.
this
in
The
data
study
confusion
of
to
relation
of
therapy
the
study
further indicate that when only minimal memory impairment deveresult.
is
to
likely
no
improvement
after
prolonged treatment,
lops
While some of the patients in this study seemed to beneﬁt thera-

peutically with minimal memory impairment within ten treatments,
of
indices
brain
dysother
with
marked
showed
changes
usually
they
15. As these patients are
and
EEG
test
the
Amytal
such
function
as
in
rather
treatdiscontinued
early
reduced
or
frequency
placed on
receivwith
them
patients
is
to
there
no opportunity
compare
ment,
similar
fashion,
basis.
In
week
times
three
a
20
a
on
treatments
ing
also
has
and
of
lack
improvement
no
between
change
a relationship
been observed in a study of eosinophile levels following electroshock 17.
is
here
measured
not
as
induced
the
impairment
Although
memory
subtle
remains
that
the
possibility
related
to
improvement,
directly
7» 3
memories
selective
of
the
facilitate
repression
changes
memory
reinforce
which
such
denial,
reactions
defensive
as
of
or the emergence
mechanisms
defense
15.
these
induced
by
behavior
in
Changes
changes
used in this
those
than
other
with
measurable
be
techniques
may
study.

�Korin,Fink and Kwalwasser

96

Summary and Conclusion
Studies of changes in learning and recall function during electroshock were undertaken.
Group data indicated: (1) a signiﬁcant decrement in the recall of
common words following the interpolated learning of nonsense
syllables which persisted during all intervals of treatment (P = .01)
for both intra- and inter-group comparisons; (2) a signiﬁcant decrement in learning at the 4—6 and 7—9 interval of treatment where
change from intra-individual pretreatment scores was maximum;
(3) the return of both learning and recall functions to the pretreatment
level or better within 3 weeks of termination of treatment.
Analysis of individual patterns of response indicated that 29 of
32 patients showed a pattern of decrement following recall with interpolation during treatment.
When the improved and unimproved patients were evaluated
res P ectin g the P resence of memorY imP airment, no si gniﬁcant diﬂ'erence was obtained between the two groups.
It is concluded that electroshock with the Reiter CW 47 C electrostimulator (1) induces memory change as measured here and that
such change is reversible; (2) that marked memory changes are not
a prerequisite for improvement but that (3) the lack of marked
memory changes with 20 treatments is associated with lack of improvement.
Bibliography
2
—
1947.
abnorm.
206,
Brower, D., and S. OppenP.: J.
soc. Psychol. 42,
heim: J. gen. Psychol. 45, 171, 1951. — 3 Luborsky, L. B.: J. nerv. ment. Dis. 107,
531, 1948. - 4 Michael, S. T.: Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. Chicago 71, 362, 1954. —
5
Brody, M. D.: J. ment. Sci. 90, 777, 1944. 6 Zubin, J.: J. Personality 17, 33,
1948. 7 Janis, I. L..' J. Personality 17, 29, 1948. — 8 Janis, I. L., and M. Astrachan:
9
—
1951.
Wilcox, K. W.: Papers of Michigan
abnorm.
501,
46,
Psychol.
soc.
J.
1“ Liberson, W. T., and
—
1949.
Arts
and
of
Letters
35,
357,
Science,
Academy
P. H. Wilcox: Digest Neurol. Psychiat. 13, 292, 1945. 11 Hoch, P. H., and L. B.
Kalinowsky: Shock Therapy: Psychosurgery and Other Somatic Procedures in
— 12 Kennedy, C. J. C., and D. Anchel:
&amp;
1952.
New
York
Grune
Stratton,
Psychiatry.
13
—
1942.
Wilcox, K. W.: Conﬁn. neurol. 14, 318, 1954. 317,
22,
Psychiat. Quart.
14
Stevens, S. S.: Handbook of Experimental Psychology. J. Wiley &amp; Sons, N.Y.
1951. — 15 Kahn, R. L., and M. Fink: Relationship between Altered Brain Function
and Denial in Electroshock Therapy. Presented at American Psychiatric Association
Meeting in Atlantic City, May 1955. — 1“ Weinstein, E. A., R. L. Kahn, L. A. Sugar17
1953.
Amer.
L.
Alexander, S. P., and J.
and
Linn:
109,
389,
J. Psychiat.
man
F. Neander: Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chicago) 69, 368, 1953.

1

Stone, C.

—

——

——

——

�April 15, 1955

Relation of Changes in

Memory and

Learning to Improvement in Electroshock*

by
Hyman
Max

Korin, M.S. (1)

Fink, rm”).

(2)

and
Simon Kwalwasser, M49. (3)

From

the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, ulen Uaks,

New York

*This investigation'was supported (in part) by a research grant
from the National

Institute of

HA92?

Mental Health, Public Health Service:

(1) Research.Assistant (peychology)
(2) Director of Research
(3) Associate Medical Director

�Relation of Changes in

Memory

and.Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

In the course of studies of the relation between altered brain function
and improvement following electroshock therapy, the present investigation of
memory

functions

was

undertaken.

variables, an attempt is

made

serial testing of learning

By

first

to study and quantify

and

recall

memory changes; and

then to determine the relationship between therapeutic outcome and such changes.

effects during electroshock therapy are commonly observed, and
are both of practical and theoretical interest. Although differences in methodAmnestic

ology, materials, subjects and electroconvulsive techniques make

direct

compar-

ison difficult, a few conclusions related to the question of concern in this
study can be derived from published investigations.
The

majority of investigators state that no significant

other intellectual impairment remains
study, (5) however, noted that

two

memory

loss of

or three weeks after treatment (l-h).

patients, otherwise fully recovered, reported defects affecting long familiar names of persons and places, lasting a
year or more. Zubin, (6) found no indication that electroshock destroyed.mems
One

5

cry traces, and concluded that where memory loss

persists, the progress is

one

of slow recovery rather than obliteration.

In studies of personal memories selective circumscribed amnesias at

least four

and

five

weeks

after therapy are described for material elicited in

pretreatment interviews (7) (8).

The amnesias, however,

to subtle emotional factors, rather than permanent

vations, Janis (8) postulates that

are construed as due

loss. From such obserb
facilitates repressions and

memory

memory impairment

thereby reduces affective desturbances.
Regarding the qestion of memory impairment as a prerequisite

for improv-

that three techniques of electroconvulsive therapy,
"
"
the
the
standard or Carletti and the "brain-facil"organic shock",
namely,
ement, Wilcox (9) notes

itation

"

techniques, are based on concepts which attribute varying degrees of

importance to amnestic change, Studies based on the "brain-fanilitation" tech»

�-2nique where the low current type Reiter and 'brief-stimnlus' electro-stimulators

are used, emphasize the diminished

memory change

induced as compared to the "stand~

ard technique", although reported therapeutic results are analogous. (10)
Kalinowsky (11), believe the "standard" technique

is

Koch and

the most effective therap-

clinicians using the "organic-shock" method hold that a
therapeutic
of
electroshock
is essential for
success (12). In a
regressive type

eutically;

and numerous

specific study of this problem, Wilcox (13) recently found

no

relation between

either the treatment induced confusion seen immediately following
initial Reiter electroshock, or after a series of ten electroshocks.

improvement and

an

METHOD AND MATERIALS.

The

ment and 21

subjects are ho consecutive patients referred for electroshock treatuntreated controls at Hillside Hospital.

The

clinical diagnosis in

the electroshock patients include involutional depression, 7; manic depressive
psychosis, 18; reactive depression, h; paranoid schizophrenia, 3; catatonic
schizophrenia,

5 and

hebephrenic schizophrenia, 3. The depressed patients tend

to be older - between to and

68

years of age; the schizophrenic patients are young-

years. For the untreated group, patients designated as
possible electroshock candidates were selected. They are a represenative sample

er, between

2h and he

of the electroshock group matched proportionately with reSpect to diagnosis, age,
education and previous electroshock treatment.
The

was

Reiter

CW

h?

C

electrostimulator

was used

in all cases. Treatment

administered every day, and was reduced after the second week depending on

the clinical condition of the patient.

test of the ability of patients
to recall an original learning of lists of eight, three letter common words, at
weekly intervals under two conditions: (a) immediately after an interpolated learning of a list of nonsense syllables; (b) after a ten minute rest period during
which a copy of "Life" magazine is read.
Methodologically, the study involves a

�The

choice of testing method and materials was based on Studies in retro-

active inhibition which indicate that the degree of retention of a learning task

varies with thetype of activity interposed between an original learning and the
later measurement of retention. Thus, by interpolating nonsense syllables and

test days each week, two indicators of recall function of varying sensitivity is obtained.
In the test procedure lists of common words and nonsense syllables are

the reading of a magazine on separate

arranged according to established experimental procedures respecting successive
consonants and vowels (1h). Each

cards by the examiner.

The time

list

of words was presented manually on flash

interval of exposure

was

not definite during

learning and seldom exceeded five seconds. For recall, however, 10 seconds

was

uniformly permitted.

lists for the interpolation condition the
maximum of ten trials; or less if the list was

In the presentation of the
words were presented

earlier.

The

list

for a

common

learned

of nonsense syllables was then similarly presented. In the

no-interpolation condition the learning procedure

was

similar, except that reading

"Life" magazine was substituted for the nonsense syllables. Each condition was

tested weekly
The

on non-electroshock days,

control group

was

alternating between successive treatments.

tested in the

same way,

twice weekly for five weeks, to

simulate the testing for 12 electroshock treatments. Following completion of

treat-

ratings of improvement were determined independently by the supervising psychiatrist on the basis of observations of ward behavior and psychiatric interviews.

ment,

The improved

patients

were those

in

whom

and.whose acute symptoms had subsided.

there

was a marked change

In the moderate improved group, there was

a transient change in behavior but symptoms persisted.
were those

in

in behavior.

whom symptoms

in behavior,

persisted or increased

and

The unimproved

in

whom

patients

there was no change

�RESULTS

1. Original and.Interpolated Learning -

in learning function occurred during treatment in the electrogroup. This was seen in the increased mean number of failures to learn the
and syllables as the number of treatments increased (Fig.1). The decrement
Impairment

shock
words

in learning is maximal in the

h—6

and 7-9 electroshock periods.

In the

10—12

treatment period this decrement in learning ability decreases. This decrease
be

the result of a change in therapy from three to two treatments weekly in

of the patients.

\

Considerable recovery in learning function occurs when

at 3-h

ments are administered

day

mean

many

treat.

intervals.

Following termination of therapy, the decrement

reversible, so that the

may

in learning is completely

errors are significantly fewer than pretreatment.

For the untreated group, the errors decreased

in each of the simulated intervals

of electroshock (Fig. 1), probably due to the factor of practice.

This'data for original and interpolated learning indicates therefore that a
reversible
which
obtained
significant-decrement is
during electroshock
after
is
termination of therapy

when

intra-individual comparisons are

made.

This obser-

_vation confirms previous reports (l—h).

II.

Recall—Interpolation and no-Interpolation Ontests of recall of learned.words

from pretreatment'was

significant at the

l

after interpolation, the

per cent level for

decrement

all intervals

of

treatment inThe electroshock group. In contrast with the original and inter-

polated learning which

was

first significantly altered

during the h-6 treatment

period, the recall function'was significantly impaired Within the 1-3 interval.
(Fig. 2)
When

evaluations are

made

of recall of the learned word

lists after

reading

"Life" magazine ("no-interpolation"), the changes are similar to those obtained

for original

and

interpolated learning.

These obserbations

indicate thatthe type

�later

of activity interposed between an original learning and a

measurement of

re-

tention is an important and useful factor in eliciting subtle changes in function.
reversible
Post therapy, the decrement is
for both interpolation and no-interpolation recall.
foregoing results indicate that a significant

The

in the 1-3 treatment period
sensitive measure of change

III.

occurs with-

that recall following interpolation is
in function than learning.
and

a more

Relation of Recall and Learning Responses to Improvement In the analysis of individual data for the relation of recall fun-

ction to clinical improvement, the scores of
week

memory change

for at least

3

weeks, were assessed.

Of

38

patients, treated three times per

these, twenty-nine showed a pattern

of decrement in recall function (scores of zero or below pretreatment).

of the

pattern of decrement in recall in a similar

matched controls, four showed the same

testing period while seventeen showed no decrement.
The treated patients were then r‘cate'gorizled. as to improved, moderately improved, and unimproved by the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electro~

unit. The number of subjects in each group are tabulated accordloss in Table 1.

shock treatment

ing to memory
Table

I.

Decrement and No Decrement Groups During Recall Compared with Reapect to Degree of Improvement.
Decrement

Improved

12

Moderately Improved

h

Unimproved
To

No

13

facilitate statistical study the

Decrement
2

’

1
6

improved and moderately improved groups

are combined, and compared with the unimproved group. A chi square of .22 indicates that no significant difference between these two groups exists. Thus,

there is no indication that clinical improvement is necessarily related to decrement on interpolated

recall tests.

�this analysis for recall, the data for the learning of common words
is similarly evaluated. Of the 38 patients, 25 showed a pattern of decrement in
Following

learning function (number of errors above pre-treatment), and

(errors below pre-treatment score). In the control group of

ment

only one subject was
When

is

13 showed no

in the decrement range.

relationship between improvement and decrement in learning (Table 2).

is not statistically significant

This relationship, however,
concluded, therefore

decrement

subjects,

21

these patients are grouped according to their psychiatric ratings, there

an apparent

It is

decre-

that

by the chi square

relation exists between clinical

no

test.

improvement and

in the pattern of learning.
Comparison of Degree of decrement During Learning with Ratings of
Improvement.

Table 2:

Decrement

+++
7(ML%)

3(1805%)

Improved

2(h0%)

0

Unimproved

h(2h%)

3(18.5%)

Improved

Moderately

++

-

+

No

Decrement

-

2(12 05%)

2(1205%)

2(1205%)

1(20%

l(20%)

l(20%)

3(18.5%)

1(6%)

6(35%)

patterns of response are based primarily on changes during the
and 7-9 intervals of treatment. For the majority of patients, these are
The above

h—6

at such times electroshock therapy was reduced
or discontinued. Five patients, however, were treated three times per week for
18 or more treatments. Clinical changes during this period were minimal and

points of

maximum

decrement, and

following termination of therapy,

all

were rated as unimproved.

patterns in these patients remained at a minimal or
For

recall following interpolation,

however, these

no decrement

patients

The

learning

level throughout.

showed a decremhnt

during treatment with scores below both pretreatment and also post therapy.

these patients did

show

Thus,

evidence of brain dysfunction by the more sensitive re-

call interpolation variable. 1“evertheless, failure to develop changes in the
learning function after relatively prolonged treatment suggests that improvement
is unlikely when there is minimal brain dysfunction. This interpretation of the

�data

is

supported by the findings of Kahrland Fink (15) who, in this laboratory,

used the electroencephalogram and Amytal tests (16) as indices of cerebral change,
and found a high, correlation between degree of brain dysfunction and improvement.
DISCUSSION

In similar investigations of
the learning task

memory

function with

lists

of words and syllables,

before therapy and recall was tested at varying

was completed

intervals after termination of therapy. In this study serial measures of change
in learning and recall obtained on the day following treatment are assessed. As
group data, they

verify the findings of other investigators that significant decrements in learning and recall functions occur during electroshock which are reversible by the third week following termination of therapy.
Recall after interpolation
For

is the

most

this variable, a significant pattern of

sensitive indicator of dysfunction.
decrement

is evident in

the electroshock group. Thus, the majority of these patients show
memory change

in the first
the single

some

of 38 of

quantifiable

during treatment. F'urthermore, a significant memory impairment occurs

week between

This

EST.

is reported to

29

the 1-3 treatments which

is true

even though the Reiter

minimize amnestic

effects.

measurable 2h hours

after

electrostimulator used here

During learning, the impairment

significant only during the second and third

terval). In the hth

is

is

weeks of treatment (h-6 and 7-9

in,

interval) there is less impairment of the learning scores. This change, however, is an artefact of a particular method of treatweek (10-12

ment whereby electroshock frequency
becomes apparent.

is

reduced as a favorable

clinical response

Thus, between the 7-9

interval, 12 patients are discontinued
and 20 others are reduced. Nevertheless, for most patients the peak of memory
decrement is reached between the fourth and ninth treatments. Seemingly, greatest

therapeutic benifit is derived at this time.
When

the patients categorized according to individual patterns of response

in both recall and learning are

compared with

their ratings of

improvement, a

�relatively high proportion with marked memory changes fail to improve. This
finding suggests that brain dysfunction pg; §g_as measured by learning and

recall is not sufficient to induce a therapeutic effect. A similar conclusion
was reached by Wilcox in her study of the relation of confusion to therapy(13).
The data in this study further indicates that when only minimal memory impair-

after prolonged treatment,
of the patients in this study

ment develops

no improvement

While some

seemed

is likely to result.

to benefit therapeutically with

minimal memory impairment within ten treatments, they usually showed marked

test

changes with other indices of brain dysfunction such as the.EEG and.Amytal

(15).

As

these patients are placed on reduced frequency or discontinued rather

early in treatment,'ueiris

no

opportunity to compare then with patients re-

ceiving 20 treatments on a three times a week basis. In similar fashion, a

relationship between lack of change and

also been observed.
in a study of eosinophile levels following electroshock (17).
no improvement has

Although the induced memory impairment as measured here

related to improvement, the possiblity remains that subtle

ilitate

is not directly
memory changes

fac-

the repression of selective memories (7,8) or the emergence of de-

fensive reactions such as denial, which reinforce changes in behavior (18).
Changes induced by these defense mechanisms may be measurable with techniques

other than those used in this study.

�SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Studies of changes in learning and recall function during electroshock were
undertaken.

data indicated: (1) a significant decrement in the recall of common
words following the interpolated learning of nonsense syllatles which persisted
Group

all intervals

during

of treatment (P

=

.01) for both

intra

parisons; (2) a significant decrement in learning at the

and

h—é

enter group

and 7-9

comp

interval

of treatment where change from intra-individnal pretreatment scores was max(3) the return of both learning and

imum;

level or better within

3 weeks

recall functions to the pretreatment

of termination of treatment.

Analysis of individual patterns of response indicated that 29 of 32 pat-

ients

Showed

a pattern of decrement following

recall with interpolation during

treatment.
When

the improved and unimproved patients were evaluated respecting the

presence of memory impairment, no significant difference was obtained between

the two greups.

It is
or induces
2)

that

that electroshock with the Reiter CW h? C electrostimnlat-“
change as measured here and that such change is reversible;

concluded
memory

prerequisite for improvement but that'changes with 20 treatments is associated with lack

marked memory changes are not a

3) the lack of marked memory

of improvement.

�[REFERENCES

l.

Stone, C.P.: Losses and Gains in Cognitive Functions as Related to Electroconvulsive Shocks, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
ha: 2-6-21u, (April) 19u7.

8.:

Effects of Electrcshock Therapy on Mental
Functions as Revealed by Psychological Tests, Journal of General Psychology, g5: 171-188, (April) 1951.

Brewer, D. and Oppenheim,

,The

Luborsky, L.B.: Psychometric Changes During Electric Shock Treatment, JOur.
Nerv. and Ment. Disl, 191: 531-536, (June) l9h8.
-

Michael, S.T.: Impairment of Mental lfunction During Electric convulsive
Therapy, A.M.A. Arch.Neurol. and Psychiat. 11:362-366, 195k.
Brody, M.D.:

Zubin,

J.:

Prolonged Memory Defects Following Electrotherapy, Jbur. Ment.
Sci. 90: 777-779, (July) 19hh

Functioning in Patients treated with Electric Shock Therapy, Journ/ pf Berspnality, 17: 33-h1, (April) l9h8.

Memory

Janis, I.L.:

Fellowing “lectroc Convulsive Treatments, JOurn.
of Personality, 11: 29-32, (April) 19h8.
Memory Loss

Janis, I.L.and.Astrachan, M.: The Effect of Electroconrulsive Treatments
on Memory Efficiency, Journ. Abner. and boc. Psych., ﬁg; 501511, (October) 1951.

9. wilcox.

.

K;W;: Psychological Studies in ﬁlectroshock Therapy, Michigan
Academy of Science, Arts and J«etters,
357-368, l9h9.

ii:

Electric Uonvulsive Therapy:

10. Liberson, W.T. and wilcox, PlH.:

Comparison

of Brief Stimuli Technique with the Friedman Wilcox - Reiter
Technique, ”igest Neural. and Psychiat. 12; 292-302, l9h5.
—

L.B.: Shock Therapy: Psychosurgery and Uther
Somatic Procedures in Psychiatry, Grune and Stratton, New York

Hoch, P.H. and Kalinowsky,

1952.

12. Kennedy, C.J.C., and Anchel,D.: Regressive Electric Shock Thur: Treatment
in Schizophrenics Refractory to Other Shock Therapies, Psychiat.
Quart. ﬁg; 317, 19h2.
13. Wilcox, K.W.:

finia

S.S. Stevens:

1951.

15.

Confusion and Therapy in Electroconvulsive Treatment, ConNeurologica, lg; 318-326, l95h.
Handbook of Experimental Psychology,

J.

Wiey and Sons, N.Y.,

Fink,M .: Relationship Between Altered Brain unction and
Denial in Electroshock Therapy, Presented at American Psychiatriﬂ
Associatimn, May 1955.

Kahn, R .L. and

-

�.12-

16. Whinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., 5ugarman, L.A., and Linn, L.: The Diagnostt
Use of Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Dodiumf') In Brain Disease,
Amer. Jour. Psych. ;92: 889-89h, (June) 1953.
17. Alexander, S. P. and Neander, J.F1: Adrenocortical Responsivity to Electic
Shock Therapy and Insulin Therapy, Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat.
92: 368-371;, (March) 1953.

�up“

ELECTROSHOCK RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
DFF'GERS 1954‘1955

DR. PHILIP a. REED, (Ex-Plaza.)
1800 E. TENTH S12, INDIANAFULIS 1. IND.
on. TITUB H_ HARRIS,
316 STRAND, BALVESTDN, TEXAS
DR. HOWARD D. FAEINB
2314 AUBURN AVENUE, CINCINNATI 19. :1th
DR. ERNEST H. PARSONS

DR. BERNARD L. PAGELLA, FEES.
a. 5131. 57.. New YORK 21. N. Y.
DR. WILLIAM L. HOLT, dﬂq VICE-FEES.
ALBANY HOSPITAL. ALBANY, N. Y.
DR. PAUL H. WILCDX, SEC'Y-TREAI.
526 w. TENTH 5T.. TRAVERBE ClTv. MIGHi

us

(“dun“)

nggg;
may

PRLLE AWARD

8, 1955

Atlantic City, m.J.
Prize Paper:
at

on

of

Uh

'earnin to

es ‘n memorr nd

in electroshock

1m

rovement

by

Korin, a.S.
Fink, M.D.

Hyman

max

and

Simen nwalwasser, m.D.
hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

m.r.

the Prize Committee, wish to congratulate the
authors on their excellent paper. Our decision was made because
this paper is based on a carefully worked out research design
and reports the development of a sensitive measure of the
transient mental impairment occurring following elecﬁpshock
convulsions. We anticipate that this method will have broad
ap;licatmon in the evaluation of the various physiodynamic
We,

therapies."

Enclosed herewith is a check for $100.00 to be
divided among the authors.

iguana

liBernard L. Pacella, m.u.
i

M;

ta

”William L.

«4 /,/%
7w,
3m.
nolt, dr.,
:7

7v
-

.

~p

.

MIA/Mb»
PM
Paul
Wilcox,
H.

m.u.

The Electroshock Research Association is incorporated under the laws of Michigan as a non-proﬁt corporation to promote
and coordinate research and clinical investigations regarding electroshock therapy and related therapies in mental diseases.

�w.-b ::

m and Clinical threats 0: New
Wattle amdmguith maptic pregame: aniline-ta theme:
Sam Medias have iadieatad

meme},

its

nee thnnuwith untrusel and

in aativeting the

m.

pnamt away emeem

r

_
_

ephrenia and
suspected

that

tint 1a” aypmhmian mm

it in a safer and antler drug

Heginida also has an enema-barbiturate
an evaluatim

with

ta use
effect. a»

at these properties at agenda.

ho patients with

meal aim”, chieﬂy achie-

invelatiml «pneum, as well as more}.

We brain disease, mm studied.

with definite er

gums mid. it is available in
sciatica: for m. mention at a mum. emu-sum a: 0.5% (5 mg. in
Ice). Itmmmmuamtemedmbedyunight. This ranged
ﬂames is a

eyelie derivative ef

truth tam eaparninnta 03‘20 to 95m. perms. Thirtaonpationta
mime mama initially mum be intmveneue Mu anytal. In the

15061me
“W
amatemd.
We» Watered

remaining instances

magma
based an

was

given

The sodium

initiallyandthm
at a rate

M Wt and in am” nemmry to indme mums, alerted

speech and

Wine”.

Hasty de 619'.

altered the

:‘

m in allpatiants but

memwéwarthiaehmgevmaefmpatienttopetim. Thom

frequwt initial altemtim m the appeamm a: elm: activity at Iva-5% ape,
at low to
voltage. This was irregular,
aeeaaimnm appear»
ing in shat-t bursts, met
at the frontal and Moral electmdea,

ma

2'

but diffuse

am! always:

W

M

amtrieal.

As

wt
beam mm

the injection emtimm! the

aetivity incmaed and its appearance in bursts sometime
In a few instances
freeman The veltaga of this delta activity
of

eleva-

mm.

_

\
i
F

Presented at

the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, Jew York, Dec. 5, 1956.

&gt;

4
r

t

��93*

mmsmmpmmmwgwmmamim.
mﬂupnagmtermmaf
mamas:
Md
w;
mmmm,
m
m mﬁmts mm given 1mm swim «mamas, after mam
Irish”

am .6

|

GBQRIM¢

W

mt» aim amid be attained ( 1.», mama, alumd spam}: and
new) aim amiss of. man-him '31: M: 500 ms. me mm EEG mtivitw
a":
In mt
Meet! byﬁeglﬂée mm ﬁlm:

mm,
the

:

amloped. In a fw instances, hmr,
fast
activity usually pmdmd by barbiturate failed to, develop; and accumully
af slur mtiﬁ’ay irregularhr ar in mm. appeared.
mm
the usual habitat-at:

EEG

mm

SLIDE
1::
,

given 1a amounts necessary

was

03*

81m;

Mr W

ta

manna

01‘

W,W

”was mwgim‘ at“:

alarm

The meat. ski-129.22g 611223.931

at mama me the

patients:

spawn, and drums»

ammm

during the

H

‘

9.1an a: m 13mm. m patient mm mm, the

max-canned,

mmemmehdiupmd.

Atthamaof’ﬂm

wordinggwiammSwlSmmaﬂorthﬁtWﬁmwmmﬁd.

Wt.

mm

car
mums:- mm cm
patimtm alert. the
ané
clear.
meat,
pit. mindiag hula-taunt walking, as study.
m

the

W

muaﬂmmmmmmmmmmmmmnpummme
Witmm unto.
4::
the
was
“the 133%th
aux-am Motion mamas m

m
3W
moﬁmmmmmummmm

alpha nativity mtumeé m-

bursts a:

slam:

Witty

Atmendomhewwumme

in

wt mm

WWW,

and
Tim

high manage

{at maturity m managed.

��in"

as...

m

not appreciably attend by magnum: tn. these eases st barbiturate meme
12:3 in view 9f the name. alerting,
fanning
pram by I:

Wm“.

Psmgs tho stage at metabolism at museum in the
tether stats muted or barbiturate 11:12th «mime! is the pmestt
than.
study is éiftwent
in the am]. Wimto poisoning.

negate has Maptic

1..

pm

193a appmmum than mm“).
ta
in mutating gamma.

appears

to

page

2.

properties statue:- ta these es
and

mm)... It

my be an

W

drag

mmtsnmtagmmtemmemsimmmmsfmm

ital. Its

eg
the
use

Maui».

‘

tht
I

at barbiturate panning

m

further

in.»

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2454">
                <text>Relation of changes in memory and learning to improvement in electroshock. Confinia Neurologica 1956;16(2-3):88-96.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2455">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2456">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-19-023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2457">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2458">
                <text>Korin, H; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kwalwasser, s.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2459">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2460">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2461">
                <text>[Preprint] and publication. Confinia Neurologica. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Electroshock Research Association Atlantic City, New Jersey, May 8, 1955. From the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2462">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2463">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74448">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81009">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87570">
                <text>Basel; New York: Confinia Neurologica</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94131">
                <text>Spiegel, E. A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6738" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6554">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/97daec70fcaf9223c3cc93bef9185f48.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ea0a277a541fba43d45012096746cae2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107159">
                    <text>W,
;_
.

»

_

.

‘g
wA

.73.- ..g c 7...

._.‘

.v

—.—‘.n,

we“---

,

V

,_

m-

V

,7

, v.‘

-,v

V.

-

,

—

xv-

.r

f.»--,—-

,.v—.-“.....:v«u..w,amw

.

.mmng—W (tr/33‘; «waver—u... .Mwm—V w...
_

-

.

Electroshock
and
in
Improvement
Charges
of
Electroencephalographic
Relation
Therapy *
Max

Fink, M.D.

Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D.

This study was undertaken as part of an investigation of the relationship
between
V

”0.4",“

.,

altered brain function

to electroshock therapy.

Twentyb

prior to and at
weekly intervals duringanki following the course of treatment. The total of
four consecutive patients referred for

A.

awn-wmw

and response

160 records so obtained were

age percent time

time delta

at

EST

were given EEG'S

classified according to five criteria: the aver-

delta for three given lead combinations, the highest percent

any one lead combination, the slowest

delta frequency, the durb

ation of the longest bursts and the highest delta amplitude.

On

the basis

of the percentile scores obtained for each factor, the relative position of
each record was determined.

in the upper third of the distribution were

Those

considered to have high degree abnormality, while those on the lower third were
low degree abnormality.

By

this

method

found between improvement and the

EEG

showed a high degree abnormality

after

weeks and over 90%

after three

weeks.

of analysis a definite correlation was

rating.

Of

one week of

first three

had such a record by the fourth week of treatment.

for each of the

EEG

treatment,

80%

A

factors analyzed separately.
week

two

weeks and only one

similar relationship
The

was

findings were con-

firmed in a subsequent investigation of 30‘patients in which the

tained in the second and third

after

25%

In the unimproved patients, however,

none had a high abnormality record during the

found

the improved patients,

EEG

data ob-

of treatment were used to prognosticate

�nﬁi

m\

improvement.

It is

as determined by

concluded that early and persistent altered.brain function,

this

method,

is

a necessary

prerequisite for improvement after

electroshock therapy.

*

From

the Research Service, Hillside HoSpital, Glen Oaks,

New

York.

�sawmm
MMW§WM
w,

VJ'IWWVWMM-ﬂmmﬁmm
hula-«ﬁght
ﬁwﬁymgmrmwt
mm“
Wmmunmwm;
W
mmummawmmmwwmmm W
-

’3

mmmmmmmammmm
mummmmmmummm» "$01:me
‘-;:wamaf
w*:.mmuumwmm_
m
h

zwm .»,wmawmmmuwwwm

m
Eegmuﬂ)

,

W3¢MW.M:

��WMWWnMﬂmmemW-,'
W
mmmmwmummwt
tmmttnwWmhmhmz-Mnnmhmumtnmw
thatmatmm WM”
mmmmmt
Wanm
mummm
Mahatma:
Wmmmm
“

mmmm
mum
mammmmmm
manpmuummmmm,mmmmmm
mwmmhm
«mmmmmmm
mmmwmm ammumthlm
mm
Wrmmiarmm
Wthanntht
mmnmm%
my
were”
mmww
Mmgmhhu
hmwwmm
mwmmmmmmwmmmwm
WWWmtmrm-rammwww
Wag“
mm
hm
mamwmmmmmmmmmmwm
-

,

-

pa.

�Relatidn of Electroencephalographic Changes and Improvement in Electroshock Therapy

(

3

M
,

7' W41]

Fink M .D
Robert L: Kahn, Ph.D.

Max

fir/V
v,

,

.y

This' study was undertaken as part of an investigation of the relationship

41/4er
between altered brain function and reaponse to

I/mt—wju?

Twenty-four consecutive

’P—EII‘P

patients referred for

were given EEG-'5

EST

prior to

during and following the course of treatment. The

.«

and

at weekly intervals

total of

.

100 records‘ were

classified according to five criteria: the average percent If time delta for
'Mbmﬂavv
I
three given lead, the highest percent time delta at any one lead; the slowest

WM

frequency;

amplitude,

w“
H,

mm.

W

the tame- of the longest
On

the basis of

)‘n.

MAJ

bursts and the highest 601/9“—

percentile scores ob-

samba-med

'

tained for each factor, the relative position of each record was determineg
gose in the upper third of the destribution were considered to have 1 high degree

A

W MW
W“
correlation

tau/inc. Ml‘tW/‘au‘
abnormality, By this method of analysis

improvement and the FE .

after

‘

1gh’abnorma11ty

was found between

_

6f the

oniy‘one week of treatment, 80 a er two weeks and
over
'

g

.

,

A

weeks.

In the 'mimproved patients,

during the
A

w
a marked

first

c'atrately.

The

I

I

was found

I

I

I

I

loe-ether-kand,

g

three weeks and only one

similar relationship

313

‘

had. such a

each of the

$in
yw

EEG

90%

4’

improved

patients

after three

none had high abnormality

record b% the fourth

factors

as

.

.

30

‘

were

usedﬁ progn

altered

bain

EEG

data obtained in the second and third week of treatment
concluded that early and persistent

W1 W
im«Lu

function, as determined by this method, is a necessaryﬂfor
provement after electroshock therapy.

W

MM”-

week?”

analyzed

findings were confined in a subsequent investigation of

patients in which the

24’?

"

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67374">
                <text>Relation of Electroencephalographic Changes and Improvement in Electroshock Therapy (research)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67375">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67376">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-4-004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67377">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67378">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67379">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67380">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67381">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence: research with Robert L. Kahn</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67382">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67383">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80940">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87501">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94062">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100623">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6741" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6551">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/130db8be85bd0b48cc58aa475a58b045.pdf</src>
        <authentication>bc509f8c91b02a75587679edc6e65f4e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107156">
                    <text>J4»

M

4‘

\
G: 3/22/57/

s '

Electroencephalogram in Electroshock: Role of

Delta Change in Behavioral

RBSponse

Following the original x observations that electroshock induces changes

in the electroencephalogram,

clinical

studies correlating snob changes with

numerous

In an exhaustive review of these

improvement were undertaken.

studies, Chusid and Pacella (1952) conclude their survey with "in our opinion,
the slow wave formations after electric shock treatment bear no direct relation-

ship to clinical improvement.

favorable therapeutic response depends

The

primarily upon the administration of a certain number of treatments in each

particular case,and since patients vary considerably in the degree of
abnormality noted with the

relationship between

changes and

EEG

it

of treatments,

same number

follows that any

clinical recovery is largely coincidentalai.
A};
A (. if‘kt" if:
I

/(/.fr

~”/

his/((9

F

,7
.6-

,

221

[ff &amp;
\

('1

F621,!”
if

,

CWA/Ll’ﬁi/I

{‘QJ/QJ { (44.1.
l

'41

[L

.6

o

’

f l!

if;

,0

a’,,.€"5.,‘

\ 2x
)4,er

1. '7

1‘

L-ﬁ
!

:13
&gt;

I"

Bdké’vttfi’

,

”1’

‘
‘

ﬂit)";
I

,

,

,

..

f,
\

Mix/4.x.

U

'

R.»

'4‘)

‘

1/6, , I.
1|

EEG

(MA

gr,“

I,

,

p.

in

7,1,, V”
‘

5

.9

4,,

(3.,

"M

/QM{

ﬂ’szf/lff’

,'

{.4
L

J“

\
(’2‘:

/

f’

:3 «m 1‘;

.-

in"

O

v’

w.»

1

,2”,

41

”
A

£146.11”

kg,”

(1

r14;

1

Q41 47‘4”! "4

1.0

7’

(nt/Z/ﬂ/f

'I"l.-',v rr

c

F

x9

if;

'A-b-

:t

{f
I

,

x

a

’,

A;

5’,

ﬂ

I”? (11"!

!

/‘)

"(Wk

,

/‘
(1..

1

f)

,-

$.44

,

a

,c

r

.,

,7

‘a

K

1

�‘

-'

J
’13]? .f‘ 5‘

V

In an early report, Hoagland

.

§§L§;;(l9h6) noted a correlation between changes in the per cent time of more

j
disturbed behavior
tr

I
/J"‘Z3’fa,t~x
V

than 13 cps activity and independent clinical ratings
became more

As

-.

T}

‘

manifest‘I, the fast activity increased. With treatment induced

behavioral improvement, this activity diminished; only to reappear with a
,_‘

if

'9‘!“ ‘AlerA

‘

1“

A

3:419:4{F’ﬁnf

reéitumu-ne of symptoms.

~35;

('1 I

a!

‘

I

.~

‘

"

v

I

f

A“

delta response an activated by intravenous

thiopentone, elicited characteristic

in the treatment course, there

EEG

was random

changes

in every subject. Early

irregular

slow wave

. A... "‘--"'-~—..

tre;;;;;E“‘EQE;eaee3¢%o
&lt;§¥¥§:nore
a highly rhythmic,
amplitude

f £41

"I,

clinical correlation.

Roth (1951), reporting the

high

I

.
/

Similar observationsﬁwere reported by Kennard

and Wilner (l9h8),without a

V

.v‘

1/1

4

runs and bursts.

These were

chiefly

activity whicht

bilaterally
2

up to 200-350 microvolts and continuous duration of 30

to
to

synchronous

cps, with voltages

3

80 seconds.

When

the resting record evinced rhythmic delta activity, thiopentone increased

voltage and duration, spread

its

area and decreased

its basic

its

frequency. Ebth

believed that these changes were related to the process of recovery, and concluded: "the development of a typical
10 of

the 36 patients

two weeks.

But

who

transient

EEG

change does not insure recovery and

obtained such change failed to remit for longer than
improvement

in clinical condition

seemed

to be related

l,‘.'

,

.

,

I

�to the
the

EEG

EEG

change even

in these patients. If

changes with the therapeutic

effect,

are correct in connecting

we

it would

seem.since most of

the patients developed typical changes, that the physiological basis for
improvement

is acquired

effective in promoting recovery."
«amen-«AW...

mzu/vx-W

it may or may not prove

by the majority of cases;

(

urn

)

y‘a—wnup-H‘QOMﬂh-MIAN-mwﬂmhﬁia m m

«WiniWW.iwm~mm

,

.,

7_

_, W_ni__u..aw»r

Iz=tsagillunily agreed'that electroshock induces diffuse slowing and
Meade,” (iég
increased voltages in the electroencephalogram. There is 1iII some inW dam/a w
dication that fast activity’, both in voltage and in per cent timel'aasae
dice!

dell-Ilia; enlistiées in nlxlxli; patients

2”

are intensively treated, -CL¢€-

who

a slowing of the persistent alpha frequencies.

degree, duration and

The

extent of the delta activity is directly related to the frequency and the
number of grand mal convulsions.

bInch

activity is usually symmetric,

and

with anterior placed electrodes, appears maximal in anterior electroenceph-

alographic leads. In patients

received twelve to twenty treatments

who have

d‘xuet
on a twice a week schedule, the electroencephalographic effects usually
“WNJw‘A

;

“ﬂmwui_w-i

«-

-‘

disappear in h -8 weeks following the last treatment.§ Studies of the prep

it»?

p

treatment

\

EEG

7

characteristics failed to demonstrate any relat’ ship with
"
_

po;t\seizure
the
electro cephalogram or clinical

\

onse.

Similarily, there

,2,.

tax: has been n report of
\
r
C/ﬂu 1 L/{L-"Ligﬂa :14 SM
K

rum—i

If
/“

.\

a relation betwe
K/

fat 6

Leg/2x,” ﬂu”?
K)

J

M.

f.”
(

thexpost treatment record
x”

A
v,

f

a [If

‘ ’

_

.-

V:

t

.

�Both of these. reports emphasize a.

W

relation between the degree of electro-

encpphalographic change and current behatioral response.

Mﬁﬂferent

aSpects are emphasized, namely delta response to barbiturate

activation and the beta response .2

m

—‘

m-...-‘.......—...7...—....-

Had other‘swlstematic

studies been done,

ha been that n correlation etween elec oencephalographic changes and
M
f:
”tax-:74“
5":
W”
Cu
X4,4!
.z/f,
behavioral response of electroshock exists. / Lack of such
if indeed

6W

.--,

‘

5

r

\‘p/‘

a relationship

arm
W
Wei
“)2”

40

/W

does

exist,

may

W

#

behavioral change,

,

-.’,

‘K"

A_Iff

measures of

I,

—

72:!

r.«L.1/€ALI':"

elm/7 ”r:

ﬂ-the relationship

between

EEG

"’-/

g

EEG Chaﬂ

geg

“(W:tﬂ/f

a”
kg";

I?!
or time
or c) methods/of evaluating behavioral response,

Whiéfux
elucidatgun
to

reflect

'

'

M/E‘C

{if

(vise/ZZ‘K;

response and

44.

.

"M

‘

���“NM

messwnaithink'

human”

change was not clearly noticable or who showed only equivocal or transient
improvement. Some showed fluctuations in behavior, at times appearing somewhat

whom

/

improved.

#1

But the changes were not sustained, so

they appeared

much

that

by the end of treatment,

as they did before.

are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement. Others might
have differed in the estimates of change in these patients. In any
case, by
We

MW.—

using this threefold classification, the differences between the
groups will

be

distinct.“

M‘ﬁe

‘i

first

.

,,

third

subjects.
these4“me
,w

mgﬂﬁﬁwgﬂhuﬁgyé‘wﬂewww“L»?«up,she?w

M.

and

WA“
s...,. 3......

suggestion of Dr. Hans Strauss (Clinical

;
cou‘oinﬂtidﬁb
three
lead
or
(fnontal.

'2’90' 0:"
*NWt‘M
*0-gis?¢ﬂm

av

.J,v

pgg‘gggja;“1%ngformléqﬁesmefEMMMSMAa‘EE.3.9“‘3'
'5"

lW-s‘i «#33253
AIWJrrrw-sv‘am .
'

‘

_

'

"‘c~"‘"“M:= 5.»...
,V

:4.

,

�.

V

.‘4

,2

C.

Minimallzfor Unimproved:

In this group were placed seven patients

was
not cleanLy noticable or who showed only equivocal or
change
transient improvement. Some showed fluctuations in
times appearing

in

whom

behavior, at

somewhat improved.

But the change was not sustained, so

of treatment, they appeared

much

as they did before.

,\‘\

that by the end

are aware of the difficulties in.evaluating improvement Others
J» might have differed in the estimates of change in these
patients. In any
case, by using this threefOld classification, the differences between the
we

1

first

and

third groups will

«*K‘EVALUATION OF EEG RECORDS:

C

)

be
A

distinct.” 1_”, 1.4 “MW, ”1,
total of 160 records were obtained in these

subjects. Fbllowing the suggestion

ofillluills

determined for three lead!
and

(frontal-parietal, anterior temporal;:vertex,
parietal-ear lobe) for 180 seconds of recording for each lead. The

delta index is defined as the per-cent time occupied by waves of 7 CpS
/°ebdéﬂbb
or
slew-n. The average delta-index for the three leads, and the highest delta
index in any lead were'éég'indices used in the final tabulation.
Simultaneously, the record was scanned for the slowest frequency
inn identified at least twice in any lead; the highest voltage of
any

delta wave; and the dhration of the longest
burst. Uther aSpects recorded, but not used in the final e/aluation, were the
regularity of burst act-

ivity, slowing of alpha activity; and.the degree frequencies d'amplitude
of fast act1v1t1es. These indices did not lend themselves to s
atistical

study; and were not identifiable in

all

the recordsp.’ Fast

activit'es

were

�.u-

7

j.

,2;

pézfzn Air. {in

//e 4/4;

xiv-sea

administered by the staff psychiatrists, using

electrostimulator. Treatment schedules were three times a
52/
As
9-to
showed
from
number
and
of
33.
varied
the
treatments
week;
patients
a Reiter

h?

C

greaémae’b

clinical

fewer
tended
the
to
give
treatments,
psychiatrist
,
spaced. There were 15 women and 9 men in the series, and

and more
__,_____.__

49/

the ages ranged from 2h to 68 with a median of h7.
EVALUATION

93

CLINICAL RESPONSE:

All the patients were observed for at

least eight weeks after termination of
ﬁiéemé;
the basis
therapy. The patient's response to electroshock was
of the resident psychiatrist's impression, staff opinion, the nurse's
notes and the clinical evaluation of the supervi§gaidxlcharge of electroshock.

The

patients were&lt;ilvided into three groups - markedly improved,

moderately improved and unimprovedJﬂaeduaa3lﬁ§EEEEEEZEEEEJEEEEiBnIhs)
response—tejeieetreshock:§

[3

A.

Markedly Improved:

The 11

cases in this group were regarded as

showing recovery or marked improvement.

These

patients

no longer showed

the symptoms which brought them into the hospital; their doctors
were

better;

felt

they

and the nurses' notes confirmed.such aSpects as being able

to sleep without medication, better appetite, and improved capacity to
get along with the other patients and participate in hOSpital activities.
B.

some improvement

These

six patients in this group showed
but continued to manifest indications of mental illness.

Moderately Improved:

patients typically

The

showed symptomatic

relief, 33;, acute depressive

features might be gone, but the dramatic change so evident in the
group was not apparent.

Each

patient continued to

show some

first

noticable

disturbance such as obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic
preoccupation.

�medication could not be; controlled our evaluations of

fast activity follow-

1",

ing electroshe’cié are not satisfactory, and the results of Hoagland
W’“‘"‘“W
.m

M

~

v

7,;

,,._,_.,.r..:.:..-.eew.u

ttaal,

”Mina-x... ..

On

the basis of tho

the records were placed in a rank order from the greatest abnormality to
the lowest. The 160 records were then divided into

third

=

3

abnomality and lowest third

high degree

EEG

m

positive correlation

groups
= Low

- i__e."upper

degree abnormal-

ity .
,

,,,.

Wﬂm.wrmnp~4ohm»wz 1..“

cheek?

max
.. __I . __'

and improvement
“Wm h. ,.wu...—.mmM

'

om

muc

high

een early

ahno
eA

dc

of tre tment. Tlie reco ds of the
I

:psyThese

)

Mr"."W“,

BydtiliZing these quanfications of slow wave abnormality in\
\
such
EEG
we
be
electroshock,
abnormalitydnduc d
duced
conclude that
{

the
in first

3 weeks

,r'response.

2. What

M

fur“
of treatment is essential for t

ﬂea;

"3

e

short term” clinical

k

exist

between

the clinical reaponse»; and then amongeach

'1
1.

ach of the indices,
0

er?

fi\st with

ity

�//'

I,

-w

_‘

Quantitative Studies of Slow

Wave

Activity

Follgging Electroshock
Despite repeated attempts: correlations between slow wave activity induced
by electroshock and subsequent therapeutic outcome have been unsuccessful.

tain conclusions

from previous studies are warrented,.heue¥sih All

Cer-

patients sub-

electroencephalogra‘z;b
electroshock
the
therapy suffer alterations in
jected to

pliilllﬁ.

Three

patterns are generally described as 1) the slowing of the alpha

frequencies; 2) the appearance of random, symmetric SIOW'wave activity, generally
activitygcigiNB)
diminution of beta
which
of high voltage
progresses to burst
frequencies in rate and amplitude. There is a direct relation between the degree
of these changes, and the number and frequency of treatments.

saturation point of change is described, which can

is not increased.

ment, but which, seemingly,
changes are

reversible.

The

In

many

be maintained by

subjects a

further treat-

Also, such electroencephalographic

rate of return of the cerebral patterns to the pre-

treatment levels is generally 1 to h weeks, depending directly again on the number,
frequency and the type of treatment.
Another area of agreement among the cited authors

ship between degree of manifest
roencephalographic abnormality.
few treatments and without

memory

is the lack of direct relation-

loss and confusion and the degree of elect-

Mamba»
cited-of severe

Cases are

memory changes

significant electroencephalographic change; and

also of severe changes in cerebral rhythms without manifest clinical confusion or

laid

memory

on such

impairment.

O

Mam!

6f

5.

£257

In these reports, emphasis isfrequently

organic confusion also correlating poorly with clinical

results 0

,Euﬁada,

with

�studies, however,

Two

cited

may be

6L0

71t7¥éodf
which—noted a

correlation between

Electroencephalographic changes and clinical improvement.
amud, Kaufman and Péagcus

Hoagland, Mal-

+1924)»

in this

19h6 study of

involutional

in the electroencephalogram and in the excretion of

-(changes

women

ketosteroids

17

accomp

panying electroshock therapy of agitated depression, Psychosom. Med. 8'

2h6-251,19h6lg, reported a relation between changes in their clinical
me,
rating scale and the per cent timeJlB cps activity;AL the
bediszirbed
havior became more manifest, the 13 cps activity increasedi Sivtreatmeht

W

induced behavioural improvement, 13 cps

activity diminished.

of symptoms, there was an increase in the
More

recently, Roth (6hanges in the

%

time 13 cps

EEG

With recurrence

activity.

under Barbiturate Anesthesia

Produced by Electroconvulsive Treatment and Their Significance
Theory of

action,

ECT

EEG

for the

and Clin. Neurophys. 2: 261-280, 1951) described

ekseTies-e£.sindies_in_nhieh a relationship between thiopentone induced
EEG changes and the
recovery process. was—elicited. Roth noted that slow
Pod“ $12.94!.
wave activity as seen in a routinenrecord was irregular in
appearance,
and he confirmed the reports that it could not be satisfactorily related

to improvement.

;

By

administering an intravenous solution of‘;fbarbiturate

thdoperitone, Beth elicited characteristic changes in the
shock

in every subject. Early there

was random

EEG

irregular slow

after electro-

activity,
which, with more treatment, increased to a highly rhythmic, bilaterally
synchronous, high amplitude delta runs and bursts. These were chiefly
wave

2-3 cps, with voltages of 200-350 uv and continuous durations of 30-80

seconds.
pentone

th: resting record
increased its voltage and

its basic

When

W

duration, spread

activity, thén-

its area,

and decreased

frequency. Roth believed that these changes were related to the

process of recovery,‘§i$haagh,;the
a typical

evinced rhythmic delta

EEG

‘4”
concluded: “’Enuaner, the development of

change does not ensure recovery and 10 of the 36

attained such a change failed to remit for longer than

patients

two weeks.

But

who

�Similar analyses of the relation of each of the indices and clinical
result showed identical curves to the group curve shown before. Slide 2
shows

the

the relation of the delta index to improvement.

to

much improved group jumps

index in

by the 7-9 treatment; while the mod-

52%

erately improved and unimproved groups
10-20% by

The mean

show a

gradual, slow increase to

the 10-12 treatment.

similar set of curves is demonstrated in slide
highest percent time delta in one lead.
A

In the next slide the mean slowest frequency

3

for‘the

is recorded,

mean

and

this

too shows the same significant relationships. While the much improved

patients

show

delta

waves down

to

3

cps or

less

by the second week

of

treatment, the other two groups barely reach h cps by the fourth week of
treatment.
Slide

the

5 shows

correlations for the

same

The much improved group show

mean

higher voltages by the second

the fourth week the differences are perseatent for

Finally, slide

6 shows

highest amplitude

the

mean

all three

duration of bursts.

week and by

groups.

The

records

of the much improved patients show longer bursts, averaging more than 7_
seconds by the third week of treatment. Bursts are less frequent in the
unimproved and moderately improved groups and are

significantly shorter

here:€E:::¢::Mthe
in duration. Not noted
factor oﬁaregulgzgity of bursts.
In the lonéﬁbursts, wave forms frequently were more regular in frequency
and amplitude, than

in the other

two

groupsl

These studies may be

measures of slow wave

interpreted as demonstrating that each of these
activity arise from the same physiological process,

and assuﬂe the same significance

function induﬁed by electroshock.

in relation to the disturbances in cerebral

�3. Finally, can these alterations in the
aSpects of cerebral function which

may

EEG

have been

be correlated with other

altered by electroshock?

In these studies, three other indices of cerebral function were assayed!
the amytal test of Weinstein and Kahn) tests of double simultaneous tactile

g?)

Si)

stimulation/and tests of memory and recall. of these three indices, only
“gigpﬁﬁt'
V/
the amytal test showed a positive correlation withimprovement and with
A);
stoma; WW may.4, 41:2th Julia“ We 0’ is
this test, the subject is interViewedm uestions o
Ahbbld atdkhuus nae: alas/d
autbaeaawae
cafhﬂa
ation of int venou sodium amytal, the
stions are repeated errors in

thQ/I-vm

.

e

orientation, coniabulation, denial
as "POSitive" amytal

t:‘t,

and

illness

and

reduplicatioh are scored

are indicative of cerebral dysfunction.

“Ms”r
Ab

tal test.

9"”
,,
.1,

#ﬂwwf

yyyﬁr”

\

In the next,slide, #7, the pe centage positive amytalthSts are
if“
if“?
compared for edéh of the three groups,
«hf weeks of treat-

‘3

-

,

jge’difference between the much impror
-i the other two groups
is strfiing. While every patient in the mu_;‘; oved group had a positive
gonna
al by the third week of treatment,
the abno
\ity persistedgF

ment.

M
was

it

W#7

ation with improvement. In this
that there are various types of cerebralﬂgyeﬁ

function and that”g;:ﬂcannot speak in gross terms of a

”Absfgeeﬂ'thew
0“,.“ n .rvn w..,,«wm.~~m—we rm«Antw-12mm

gﬂMéorrelat1on
lath

and cerebral dysfunction or organighpsychoses.
muv maxim» we.

\\I
‘\

\

111;

{ZENWWf’IﬂWW

showed no

can be concl

EEG

‘\

‘15

um!

recall? These indices

respect,

\

\f

transient despite continue. treatment.
‘

WW“

Rh

“met”. WWW”,

‘ "New“ ewes V4799» “new“.y‘d

”fI

M

51““?

ﬂag“

”Why

�*

Semen, these ethe:ee pemttethe

�5M5?

Vt

m WWM in mamm: Relating at Induced Mu nativity to

WMum,
Roam

Dunno midonblo study and
shock

mom

Wind
ahcck

1:

menu.

the man at

Recent

tho

m

enema (9.6mm, at

wow-1cm

«that. In Mm own...

chanson

u

a,

the basin

no have: obnexwd n

mum at chasm

of

am.

And)

hm

tor tho 01mm-

rolnucn comm chum

inmaumdhmmncMmaadthamquRw. hmmmm
hum batman clinical

Wt

1'ch

emanation taunting

orientation and

olcctmahock nit-h changes in

Mam

whnrbi’cal (

mummmhngmgcf ).ondmxyandmu1(
“My in

1mm:

an

mluaticn of

”mm

mums

change:

function, and

behavioral

M,
'11: our

no

mama

1::th mm.

0mm

nan

and Panama (1952)

minim, up

direct

an an incur

W.

the observation b y various observers that clontrcmm

change: in the olentmencoptulogm,

with clinical

syn--

). Thoprcmt

in thc thmnnoophalnsx-nm,

a»

),

slow

alumni}: ta

Imma-

«mung

In an exhaustive

amm

their

may

W

mm c: than

nth-tho
sum

nan fez-mum arm clam-la shod:

mm Wmt.

such

a!

Watt

tmmt but

the favorable therapeutic

mmmmmmmommwnmmrﬁ

�tmm

in

tha dame of

tone» Wt

Maul”

each

m

can, we

we

abnormality noted with the

hem

my rahtionuhip

patient: vary comidenbly in

am number of hmmts, it

Em mango: and

is
War

anneal

largely wincidental or maul-11y mini-ad to othrrr factors.”
Yet, the alwtmcephalognphie chmgu

mmnt.
and

Most

new

Wen

wltagt

611:8.an that fast.

tin;

and

in tho

who

activity is dimuy mum

mnﬂsm (

Bach

L»

law.

ﬂuent:

wha have

intensively

In

View

electromock,

or the

it

dam,

),

The

to

than

{W

appears

than is a

duration and

mummy

m

W
ind»

in percent

slowing

at tho

meat of delta

Mar afar-and m1

and tho

and with

mtarlor

mind in anterior aleetmmeﬁmomphic

received twelve to wimpy

ramming

my be

1:: voltage and

W.

(

of wires treatments per wok, the

diuppear in us new

uWhock are con:-

The” in considerable

nativity in mud]: ”metric,

plum mutant. «hatred»,
In

dootrowophﬂm.

no

Imam.

by

mart that elactmshock Mm mm»

)

(
accrual»
), bath
wtivity

in paint“

persistent alpha

(

Maud

mutants

dammiognphic

a» last mama;
ctr tho

(

mum: am

mu bum max-meme

and

humeral

a.

schedub

effects usually

).

olcotmmephalumphic

to

an

weapons.

to

that a mktionahip dam
changes. Tia

swan

�.3...
do

”human.

indicate we}: a

Mod a relation human ﬂung» in
than :3 spa) and

WW
MW

MW“,

behavioral

Wm:

pentam, elicited characteristic
of tmﬁwmt tandem

thin xeuuiy

EEG

Vchanges

ungular

to

m

209—350

m!

mum,

”than

and. continua-nu

m

banana that thaw
eluded:

want-d by 113sz men

buﬁenlly

m
mum

its mm

changes were

(39th

of

and

to

3

which in»

Mm,

high

cps. with voltages up

30 $9 60

seem.

when

the

its

thiopsntono increased

«creased

mum ta

typical

a.

2

at

activity,
mu
We
spread

“ﬂy in the

”sunny appomd,

slam warm

harm. than. mm

unravel“

resting more!

mm

and

tmta

only to ran

in every subject.

continued
treatment.
with
to
Winnie,
cmsgd

«puma.

Whoa;

an.

‘

mapma

del‘hn'

Wang... A:

fem. nativity inerumdu with

W”

of

(3.91:6)

w ”want #130 tut activity (mu

9mm,

aw; (1951), reporting the

cm

apart.

Renal-ad 33 9;

Momdont clinical mung; atbomionl

behavior beam

man: with 3

m

Iﬁ an

m

its bum tummy...

the games: at

Waxy,

and cam

m change does not insure mmzy

mmﬂmﬁpmtnmoewmmfailadtaréxd‘bfwlongw
h
* i’mﬁ
and 1mm

G
(1'9

H

u
”I
)

won-m
“a
“mm the behaviaml comﬁtim.
‘

‘

"

:51,

9"

L‘lig

Yr

'

II":

.,,i‘3l’

‘

V

�4‘.

he

than

tmiunf.

wants; ﬁat

ulaudtothcmmnge
1:33

the

EEG

mm

militia“ patient»

clung“ with ﬂat therapeutic effect,

tin patianta dueloped typical dung”,

pmt

in 0.1mm audition sound

is

W

by tho lager-1w

cf

1.9

b-

«mammotof
«on, we

Ifmara

it

most»

10111:!

that. the physiological

hula far in.

W311: any or my not pm affective

in mixing waver-y."
Bow thee»

mmmogmphie
are

Mixed,

”pom «pm-m

1 solution batman the

dams of elect“?

change Ind cement-mt behavioral suspense. Different aspect:
namely

delta

mm

to barbiturate activation and beta. not.

ivity. In tho present impetigation, quantitative aerial studio! of the dart:
anyone. were undertaken to timer the following quuuonls
(1.)

What.

in tho "lama! of the elomcophalqmphie

mama to be-

havioral responu 1n electroshock?
(2)

I: a "hummus: «mm,

:1an
aubgocta 931;

what signification my

W’

at

prior ta

a) In the

tmtmt,

8 chums). ﬁnder-It.

bipolar,

hm tor an under.

of tho process of electromoek therapy?

1mm semi, tmnty-four Maw wa-

ianta referred for chetmhoek were studied.
do!»

11-.

mammalogrm an

tad at. weekly intervals during and after treatment. wing

destromcwphnlognph and noodle

and hyperventilation

chem.

bonding in

mmum m mum emu each molding.

�'

mm

Commuting, the

at least

.6.

was scanned

for the slowest frequency identified

twice in any land; the highest voltage of any delta wave;

and.

,

the dur-

atian of the longest period or delta bum activity.

mm basis or these five indicate! eleven” nativiwma

racom were

phoeduinnnkordar,tmthomtmmto£dauwmﬂtytotho
lowest.

recordanudividod into

The 160

3

mu

m-

m

thirdm

classiﬁed as “high degree deli: a records"; the middle third, as fmdemto
dag-no

Fignm

delta a records”;

I, II,

and

and than lowest

min! as now degree delta

III portray pin-mm

mama.-

and treatment records taken

am-

inguwlwtmatmntpomodtoemlitythethm rangeaofdel’aamtiuty
indwed‘hy electmahock.
b) In a second
shock

some at raw-tour

mun,

patients, ehctmncopmlogmpluc moon!-

lent. ,Mﬂng tin
treatment.

second and third

531133

records, the

wore obtained

mks of try-stunt,

initial

observations were tested in

weeks

x

after

«comm

W m:

mum

on

A11

of max-aw.

after

first eerie:

of 160

I predictive haw ofthemu

patients were

The

prior to treat--

and two ween

the named of analysis developed in the

pantie response.

mmmxg

unselected electro-

W

m- at 1am «at.

patient“ mupomo to

the bani: at the resident “psychiatrist’u

15leth m

mm,

the

nut:

&gt;

�.7...

opinion, the

man's not»

apex-visa in

and the 61111130. evaluation of tho

charge of elwbroahock. The pntients were dived-d into three groups a mob

academia]: uprated and

mama,
A.

WM!

mama
which

«an aim:

themaa‘lmtu

«coming to the following criteria;

:3,an
These punts no longer shmd the
mm

Th. 11

or Inn-had immanent.

hmgIt than into

mm

..

group were mended

the 116mm; their doctors

folt they warn mum

and

ﬁleepuithoutmdscant-ad mkupactaasbomgamn to

nation, better appetite, an!

capmw to gut along with others

improved

and

‘

participate in
B.

mm

Mimi

pmmnt

but cmtimed to

try'picany shared

gm,
Each

activities.

but the

The

units” mm

mun

amt!» 01111130

K.

idea, or

We: m

when than; a

,

m

less 111.

The

a»

haunt!

teatum night he

evident in tho first. group val not apparent .

no

m

noticablo disturbance such an obsession).

somatic pmccupauon.

raved:

mum

not clearly noticablo, mo

or who beam worse. may

showed tons

é! loam illness. mane

1.1191, 3&amp;2.” mute dopresiive

patinnt conﬂwd to thaw

thinking, paranoid

lb: patients in thisgmp

showed

change: were not

mmn

placed

showed equivocal

new patient-in

or transient changes,

ﬂuctuations in bshnvior, at

sum,

treatment, they appeared Inch as before;

however, no

that

times- appearing

by the and of

�Mesa

the

analyses of the mlatian batman the

delta activity and clinical ratings, denominated
between the

proved"

early appunnce of high @3290 delta nativity and the

classified

861 were

in the third week
in patients

and 88$

who were

or third

in

m

who

”lunch

won rated

13.

u nah

high degree 691%! in the second week;

91%

mutant. 0: the raced:

fourth week of

rated as migrated, none wan high degree delta in the

weeks

at tmtmnt,

aim
‘1:
The

and 20%

tare high degree delta

21 the

mnsudin mu 1, ma graphical; in ﬂgun h.

can

fourth week.

a

induced

significant relationship

clinical rating» 0! the meow in mucus.

mmved,

second

1

acme or

m a i m 99am Delta mom

m
Indian
W
(7)
Wed
Imam-d

85:113.:-

measured

Mam: k}

(u)
6.

(

analyses mm

indies:

91‘

of bursts, highest

Men

M

25

an

91

as

o

3.6

50

M

o

o

a

an

for the rolation hem-n each of

mm (avenge S-Mm delta,

mm,

M.

133

and slowest

highest 5mm

an...

they

duration

frequmy.) me the clinical rating!-

In each instance, the relationship or degree or induced delta index and the

clinical rating

was

sustained. This data will be

pramud in detail in a

�submmt ”port.

taunIndaxotnu-

2. Em

mmﬂmtaﬁm, contubulation

art!

dmial

ion:

1'

B

of. 11111033

in a ”matured latex-via

after the: administration or intravenous mobsrbital in patients ﬁrm brain lacuna
have ham sum-mm as signs of

13mm

arm

noted such patterns to ba

illness, unless than.

was evidence

«and probable, themfora, that
persistently
tum

mum

or new” cerebral

11'

mot

subjects,

).

(

We

had

m- m putientl hospitaliud with mm.

mum

elsutmahock indmed

patina nmbarbim tam Wild

«ﬁbril

be produced.

mmmmmu

(

). It

dysfunction,

This was indeed

mp0M&lt; ).

1n

ma,
mm
(58%)
and
10-42
fourteen
an
7-9
the
m
period,
an
am
mum
that

um; report, nu

mm

cerebral dysfunction

(671')

at the

2h

subjects, had positive

period.

In than Maw—four subjeotl, than new ninety-one to". sessions during
the

mac

ital tests

of therapy for which smear-rem;

chumphalogrm and ambush-

are availnble. Pro and poet mutant. records are not. mcludod.

mmmmnmuummummamdmmmumuw
sham a high relationship, both

ratings of

immt

delta wﬁviw

a

for the tests to each other,

during therapy. In Tabla

W

II, as.

and

to clinical

degree of induced

with the results a: the concurrent

mbarbihl

mu.

�W

TABLE
KEG

II

22m .. An___%mm

W

rat.

at

Hicidle

313x

Low

Positive

(25)

29

a

8

Negative

(us)

10

15

20

Watan

relation between the test data and clinical ntings of
am also simiﬁmt. In Tabla II, the ma and uobubital tout. results
The

me'dingtothoevomnl
mmmmedgmp
27%,(5 m
had n
umber of with. gamma test mctm; sad” that tho
cluster at with. nomad, high Em delta activity and mummy in»
clinical rating.

W

Vi M

proved rating 3.: 3

negative

mm

Wits).

mung a:

om. Email: alluifieant in the cluster at

test, 19' 1nd Mo me an: activity and clued.

Wand.
Rat

/m m\
rod

ma

Hunk

High Dam and roman
Amebazbital (29)

Either
Positive

33'

Dam or

obaz‘bital (26)

hither High Dalta not

Positive Amobarbital (35)

Iv

Immed

r.

M

W

Result! an

Moderately Impmvcd

25

3

10

11

s

S

1.0

21

3.

Thedatain'kbluEmmnhumtommorotabmmtimdum

n

Simiicant by elm-aqua

:t hotter than 2! 1m). of conﬁdence.

�the course of therapy in the

any

are rater}

uriy m the
It and

at

We

initial

twenty-atom

petimte.

ra’cdsrxzvttl who

me): improved tend to develop high degree

a: treatmnt,

Table 1) similar

and sustain

ohnmtionl,

it throughout

mde for the

are gnphically portrayed in figure 5.

A

EEG

delta. activity

the period. (ﬁgure

murbitel test result”

Waite

of figures it and 5

presented in figme 6, which chm e mmrkable eongmm of the two

3. am

to

0n»

‘
»

Following the observation:

event?

is
test date.

2

in this group, that the mch

:1de

patients had developed a high degree delta neurity earl: end had untamed
such

activity, electroememalogrm were obtained during the

week: of

treat-ant in

undertaken

Sh

second and

lelectmdxock
consecutive
patients. This study

to detenine whether or net the demo «at-delta response in

third

in

pro—

dictive of the wort-eta“ thermontic outcome
The

recent: were sound

hand during both,

one

a

to whether

h1g1 degree

delte activity was who

or neither of the h~6 and 7-9 treatment periods, and

the data was related to the clinical

«elation

TABLE

I?

(Table IV).

�Ono

"W,
um (16)
20

um High (1:)

h (25$)

a (50%)

h (25$)

6 (30%)

7 (35$)

7 (35$)

.

Total (9‘)
"' '

m 31mm

22

at the

2%

19

level of confidence;

13

�«42:»

or the 131518!” the

Mint

111$

delta ”tawny during tho ”00nd and third

mksoftmtnant, éﬂmmuduuwhimmd,mhmly3motp:mu
diluent high delta are so mud.

The

sum inﬂation and

dome delta activity in rebut! to the Short ton
The

arbitrary solution of ma second

based upon an
12.15

6100ka

trauma.

mtotmm

Further

sax-ion

and

in which the

W

delta beauty,

persistence of

6113100.

mlmtim.

third week: of

tmmnt was

mags tmtaont

of this data

Wul

1&amp;1“th

m

course

m

that the div-lop»

1211le fort.

at

mm:- of weeks, in round to mum: at of immanent regardlesa of tho
tine in the course of thump: II
continua: treatment in

after 15-20

am

trauma,

m delta mhngea no first. manifest.

subjects resulting in high

is associated with 9. MM

this later period. Patients given

many

m dolta activity

Won]. msponm at

mama n

the

at.

per weak, without the mention of high dogma delta activity,
a United behavioral responu

an

- one that is

M mwm
mt

5.10

placebo responu (

Diﬁuaaig g

of three tines

Wm“

significantly different than

). Intansiw uranium. at

a.

fmqmoy of

relultant induction or high dogma dam act-

was: per

ivity, will damn-cu

not.

Thu,

:1

aignifimnt behavioral

name.

mesa studies duonstmte a consistent missionship batman the

degree and duration or induced uhctrooneephalognphie

delta utivity and clinical

�‘13-

enlmtim at behavioral change. 3ymetr1o
1m been
and

automated»

We

at tho

evidence of dysfunction

(mama;

centers

and dyerhythuo delta

system)

mam

(own

nativity

WW

Strata»)...
and

Such

indioative
of an alteration in the state of consciousness,
also
activity is

new alteration bang unouy related to the aunt-10h, mum

with more

and frequency

and
(Strauss
slow
Bid]
wane
June,
et
the
:1,
of
aotivity

Brit).

and
behavioral
between
Muted
one.
rolationohip
county
We
m

the
further
electroshock
permit:
after
aspen”
on.

mmepmm mm no:

attendmt

pluliologio basis of tho electroshock
shock process thus

physiologic

“mat

We

conclusion that ohangee in

aunties:

prom.

in consciousness an 1L

o No upset: of the electro-

elaboration: the mention of the

to the behavioral response

mm neuro-

..

and the eigniﬂoanoe of these

observations for a theory of the node, of action of electroshock

tangy.

(a) Role

Won].
cerebral

2mm.

change

Changes

and
perception,
prone”,

whatever cause, ore

In this
dependent

9%.

\mieteot
1: a
moo-pennant
in mm,

Mt

extmively

mm,

I

of alteratim in

ltti‘budl, judgent,thooght

attending changes in cerebral Motion,

documented

rm

liter-store.
in the noumlogic

electmahook has hem mum to consistently

teat emanation, in a {whim Mob we

alter

two

in-

have con- to associate with

�431).

i

has

biochmm substrate or this

mu-

away.
mm
mm

has hem placed an tho noctylchonm—ohonmstomso changes

a

(ﬁnest-in,

KeEwhun), tho “Iteration 1n blood-brain burner (Aird), chug»

Tower and

in ionic

prance” has

and

promnqunbm

[9’99 “/fsrué
/'(ﬂ’
I‘M?

7

,r‘

L.

j

44“!

[Z

(3916301 and 31113391
x

w

A“? 5 1:34:

;

I;

' ‘

3

g

a

f

ff

V

M

v

1

.-‘

- mm),
L;

z

r

g» ﬁggéfiten/

�orient-p
with
extensive
In
impatience
an
function.
cerebral
of
altered
states

am

after wherbitel,

tests”

mama (

Wemauin and his

)

(

J

( o

be” dmnetmted the pmdictiw mm of this test for arsenic cerebral

Winn.

Davie
workers
by
ee
extensive
met-cue
experience
likewise,

Oawendom(
)and-ng
).( ), Oatmmdstnnae( ).

mum“

()huefﬂmdthe
altered

in e

hm Matias.

W

‘smu

signiﬁcancecfdiffuee
other tests of

unbral

mm

been applied

seriel reunion, it. is anticipated that than, too, mule! dum-

mum

sponse, within the

in cerebral

30.6

delhectivityueninduet

chengee

W

tmtmt

salmon to vacuum re-

and e

units a! the sensitivity of the test. to reflect

change!

mum.

lame mam, elmmwbeuidtcbeenthcdormmge

muctﬂundMiantoerMMOmrwachime
behevicral respcnae.

«diam

The

mac

of belmvioral patterns induced under these

is wide. 'Inprcvemnt'

being a subjective evaluation

On

1e 3 special

one at behavionl

the part. cf the

name,

charter that the patient

1: ‘bottor.’ Electrcehcck due not induce “immanent“;

diffemt than

it indwcs a mum

of

cmbml activity in men behavicr

To

the extent that. the induced behavior in deprecaed permeate is perceived as

lose

whining,

depressed,

mane

18

or

move,

before electroshock.

or in achnophrenic patients,

�.1;-

1m maximal,
proved".

behavior,

Wham

complaining, or
typo 9!

“an.
evaluated
to.
as
is
patient
mm,
wmmry
or

harm,

am,

1+.

1..

in pamuivod a:

mom, mum,

«ammo a; 'milprovld.‘

The

paranoid,

woman-

Warm. pattern induced by electroshock, is «pendent on a

m

mm, «mammumauyam-mmtt )ummotpmm.
lumbar cramp]: o! the relation
be
to
is
laﬂw

dolt(

) (

Meow

m

on

the

of. electroencephalographic

mural mom

me:

to be-

of epileptic patients. ban»

)deaeribuoymgapﬂspucmm ordinarilypleaant,

and cooperative

for his clinic visits.

consistently dyarhytmc.
drnm, and his

1336

0:: on. occasion he

12.

than.

no: cum},

an ‘1th delta activity.

on the

that,

records

m

unable and 31th-

mbaoqmt visit, tho

m was again dynamo-ac and o a behavioral 'zhtpromnt' nu ma.

51:11::-

obumtionawm roporwdbyﬂntt( )mdnnnndor( ).
(b) Theo
Our

,

of Electron

a

.
7

_

studies of the electroshock procesn have demonstrated tho

ing. ntemtion in brain function in induced only
in

whom

the greatest degrees of behavioral change

max deem delta. activity in the

taste as indiceu or altered
indioea

and sustained

as

noted.

Wannalogm

and

follow—

in patimtl

is have mailed

positive mobarbitll

«:0an function, with the knowledge that other

at altered brain Motion, applied in the

m

sex-1&amp;1

fashion, my

�‘16-'-

alee

show
We

3mm

alteration

and a

relation to behavioral change.

have been mmeeed that the rating: pf impmvemt are value Judg-

ment- of the behavioral response. L11 patient-e

induced by electroshock

in when cerebral

wrest changes in behavior.

changes are

My certain patterns

ere evaluated ee immved, believer. while other! are regerded

u "unmoved”

Immutiaeeenuespeemeeeeefthebehaviorﬂ. mammoftheeuba
of
the
conditions
brain
altered
function.
We
Jest

recent etudiee have netted a relation of the indueed botanical

Our Home

was

to epeeific peremlity aspecteC ).. Patten“ the neat close]:

apprm-mte the “explicit verbal denial" personality

greater degrees of denial,

dieplem,

mu

),

(

euphoria and Indie beim'ior (tuning

electrosheck therapy. and: edeptetime are frequently rated

alarmed",
and

no

clinical

my

mum

at!

”m

that the reletieaehip between nationality, behavioral response

mm

is met clear.

to the behavioral reepenee

The

mutton of other upeete of

an new ﬁnder investigation.

bother new in the nun: of taproment
to the induced

W103.

1a the environmental

w
new

endeegativill
ledificetim
Tb
of inﬁll, withdmel

to excitement, overactivitw and irritebility my be considered e positive
movement by

may.

The

the met-cps.“ but a disorganization by the and

maiden or

goals of the therapist and the family, and their

meantime

�4.7 bSnoh

phyeiologic
milieu for an ultomtion
the
altered cerebral tmotion provides

of the organin‘e edeptive interpersmol behavior. Changes are induced in percep-

tion, language, mod. recall, and Judaism mick ponit

adaptive intonation:

new

with the omirmmont to unfold. the type of adaptive behavior induced under these

conditions
which the

is

dependent upon the pereondity of the subject; the environment in

intonation occurs;

and the duration or the

state or altered cerebral

Man.
i similar view of the electroshock process m initially expressed by Weinstun,

Kuhn (
Linn and

chungoe and behavioral

).

who

mailed the interrelationship or neurOphyeiologic

room”.

These etudies amplify

clude anothar index or oltered broil: function
and

«e

their obeorvotione to in-

the eiootrooneuphlograme delte

also broaden their initiol empheeie on the denial pmcoeo

fol edeptative response, to include

no

the only cameo.

0.

wide

variety of indtcod behavioro under the

conditions of altered brain

faction.

The

description of the electroshock procese

is also comietent with the

observations of more

335;( ),

Roth ( .) and Lire

59,5 ).

This neurophysiologc-edeptive interpretation of electroshock pronides on

operational definilan o! the process which has procaine or further elaboration and

obeemtiono. Such an hypothesis also hoe application to an understanding of therapeutic process in insulin com. therapy

(

), lobotav

and

tronquillieing agents

(

)e

�.3transient

in clinical condition

improvement

seemed

to be related to the

in these patients. If we are correct in connecting the
EEG changes with the therapeutic effect
it would seem, since most of the
patients develop typical changes, that the physiological basis for imp

EEG

change even

provement

is acquired

by the

it may or

majority of cases;

may

not prove

I

effective in promotingxrecovery."
In the course of studies

of‘g§:ered

function
brain
induced by electro-

at the Hillside Hospital\in New York, further data on the relationships between EEG changes and clinical effects of electroshock were collected.
The general results of previous investigations on the alterations in the
shock

EEG

with electroshock were confirmed, but

between EEu

effects

and the

ailgs‘ca,~

clinical result

a

demonstrated.

was

\

I

are presented today:

(l)

The

definite relationship

.

Three foci

\\

Engpatterns following electroshock and thein\re1ation to
K

improvement.

(2) yThe intercorrelations of different quantifications of delta

activity.
(3) The relation of these observations to
/////X

”WM
SUBJECTS

aﬁcijLQn.1

"ﬁ-"MW‘

_
i.-..mwm_w~w
T /{1 Ionic
ﬂ

_

merm”wwww‘wmmm,._V.-c.-»...«——v—~~-"'”

aim,”
Twenty-four consecutive patients
U”

§§2_MEEHOD:Z§

_ -m “ﬁlm“-..—

a theory of electroshock

shock were studi d.

"“‘m'w-"MW

referred for electro-

m4

Electroencephalo rams were done
"511* few}
1/4?!
Lot/W
a“:
channel Medcraft instrument , needle electrodes,

prior to_treatment? “Ki 8
and bipolar recording was used. Hyperventilation wea-the-ealy-activation 6034’
(L. WLALF
Q44. a,
‘
technic
g treatment, records were taken earths day'aitasrar?;ézﬁé'"v*ﬁ‘
gurum
fitter
treatment.
generally 25 to 31 hours

MLWe

0%,

3»

1'9 CL

�this point I should like to summarize our findings and express
some thoughts as to their significance for a theory of electroshock action.
There is little doubt that electroshock induces delta abnormality in the
EEG. It is symmetric, chiefly frontal, but with increasingrtreatment,
the'gequencies
With
became
treatment
leads.
to
spreads
increasing
all
At

slower, the amplitudes higher, the burst activity longer and more regular.
While delta abnormality is present in every repord after electroshock, its
degree

is variable. Roth's experiment's inducing increasing delta abnormality
with barbiturate are significant in predﬁting the later changes induced by
further electroshock. In
mality

some

subjects however, a high degree delta abnor-

is not induced despite extensive treatment.
Our

correlations of degree of delta abnonuality with improvement are

fgggziéam:ch
ism of electroshock.therapy.
significant

An

alterationm cerebral“function

and also by the

'

as measured by the

magma
as,
amytal test,* ,t'necessary pre-requisite for improvement.
EEG,

zaﬂkﬂ

early, sustained
Where such

232::::
(and in the amytal test),
chan es fail to occur in the
a significant clinical improvement will fail to occur in the patient's behavior.
not4ﬁghent
The fact that the correlations were
with memory loss, points
to the possibility that this is not a significant factor in improvement.
EEG

In conclusion, these studies lend lapport tp a theory of

EST

enumerated
action recently
by Weinstein and one of us (Kahn). These

authors postulated that improvement following electroshock

is the result

of the creation in the patient of a milieu of altered brain function in

patterns of adaptation, particularly those of denial, may be maintained. Theib EEG studies demonstrate that an altered milieu of cerebral

which new

function as measured by delta abnormality is a pre-requisite for improvement.

To

supported.

this extent the first part of the Heinstein-Kahn hypothesis is

4M.-.

.1

�~5During the

tram

generally 25 be 31
11611113131381an

(

the

) was

period. words not.

noun

lam. Emu-mm,

We...

may“!

Wu on a» ﬂy, following a trauma,

all

Wit”.

test

101'

at many intervals, berm, during

”mat “him the Wmtnont WI.

manly

been mported

pntieats

organic brain
and

study

mm

hi"

).

(

thaw-ml electromook tharapy m manicured w the

mt: manhunt“,
tins

using a Bauer 0 h? eleabmatdnulator. Treatment schedules. war. three

a week; and the number of

,,

Won

arm- thorapy,

reﬁll“ at this

The

all!!!

wore studied by

matmnu

varied from

to 33.

9

As

patients

show-d

a clinical response, the psychiatrist tended to give fiver and more widely
spaced treatments. Thorn

are

15 women and 9 man

in the

can“,

and the ages

authaudiuoth'h
mezhto
EVALUATIOE 93‘.

ject...

33

3'0nt

for three lead

“natal-ear

W:

total at

3.60

records were obtained in muse sub-

Stmﬁss
( ) the delta index was
the suggestion of

minnow

10210)

A

69%:de

(frontal-parietal, anteriar “moral .. vertex,

for 180 seconds of recording for each lead.

1: defined as the per-cont tine occupied by waves at

7 0:16

The

delta

or SWCI'.

and

1W

The

&lt;36;th
and
load
the highsat kit:
for,
three
the
combinations,
average
1mm in any om lead combination mm the

indim

used in ma fin-1 inasmuch.

�«17end

tolermm', are significant factors in the behavioral nepense of the

petieet to therapy, am also, in the rating! a!
mane

effect.

sue teeters an signiﬁcant in the

The induced changes

improvement.

duration of the electroshock

in cerebral function persist for 24: weeks only

following even intensive courses of ti‘xerepy. In
respenee

‘

W

eases, the behavioral

tenatedtemepeﬂodotalmmmmniologyo

patterns of behavior we not adaptive in the

mum

Thackunged

of the patient, and the

behavior 'regreeees' to pun-treatise“ patterns. In other

instance, the

induced behavior in adaptive to the envirement. end, we assume, sustained

therett‘ter not by the initial change in brain

Noam,

developedintencﬁenof subjectuithenﬂmmt.

is

seen by the

milieu

is

may

embd.

linen in which

13

cheereetm

have

doctor,

have, and peanut.

stem

a

1:1in or many.

led to the conclusion that electroshock

a non-specific induction or pernietent

discharge

mptive (pemnlihy)

utilize devices not otherwise available ta

- the

mm

when

Altered cerebral fmetion

the subaeeb’e

different interaction with the envimmenﬁ
These

matmiswm

only to have a mazrrence of

disgusted or discharge in

prelude: the pbyeiologic
preceesea

the newly

fmeent mememl adaptation of the patient to the hospital

after electroshock,

planning

but. b y

of altered cerebral

than”

mm.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67404">
                <text>Relation of Electroencephalographic Changes and Improvement in Electroshock Therapy (research)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67405">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67406">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-7-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67407">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67408">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67409">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67410">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67411">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence: research with Robert L. Kahn</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67412">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67413">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80943">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87504">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94065">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100626">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="249" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="40">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/de95bf5b301da53b216f4fe5fa8c04dd.pdf</src>
        <authentication>c38414ee0bbef11434639b42d1daddd0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100666">
                    <text>Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology (“7 Psychiatry
November 1957, Vol. 78, pp. 516—525
Copyright 1957, by American Medical Association

Relation of Electroencephalographic Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroshoek
Quantitative Serial Studies
MAX FINK, M.D.,

and

ROBERT

L KAHN, Ph.D., Glen Oaks, N.

Recent theories of'electroshock therapy 1'3
have emphasized the role of neurophysiologic
changes as. the basis for the therapeutic ac—
tion of electroshock. Consistent with these
theories, we have observed a relation between
changes in certain measures of brain function and behavioral response. We have noted
that evaluations of clinical improvement fol—
lowing electroshock are related to changes in
orientation and confabulation after intra—
venous amobarbital,4 learning and recall,5
and syntactical aspects of language.6
In view of these observations, it could be
expected that electroencephalographic studies
would show a similar relationship. Numerous
observers have reported consistent changes in
the electroencephalogram after electrically
induced convulsions. There is diffuse slowing with increased voltage and dysrhythmic
activity?"12 Fast activity decreases, both in
voltage and in percent time}3 and in patients
who are intensively treated there is a slowing
of persistent alpha frequencies.14 The degree,
duration, and extent of delta activity are
directly related to the frequency and number
of grand mal convulsions?"14 Such activity
is usually symmetric and appears maximal
in anterior leads, and the electroencephalog—
Received for publication June 18, 1957.
From the Department of Experimental Psychia—
try, Hillside Hospital.
Presented at a meeting of the Eastern Associa—
tion of Electroencephalographers, Washington,
D. C., September, 1955.
Aided, in part, by Grant M—927, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of
Health, U. S. Public Health Service; and the
Dalian Foundation for Medical Research, New
York.

Y.

raphic effects usually disappear in the four
to eight weeks following the last treatmentfgi9
In contrast to the consistency of these
observations, studies of the relationship between the electroencephalographic and the
clinical changes show conﬂicting results.
Chusid and Pacella,15 after an extensive
review of the literature, concluded that the
number of treatments rather than the degree
of induced delta activity, was the primary
factor related to a favorable therapeutic re—
sponse. On the other hand, Hoagland et
al.16 reported a relation between changes in
the percent time fast activity (more than 13
cps) and independent clinical ratings of be—
havioral change._ Roth2 similarly reported
a relationship between changes in the clinical
state and alterations in the delta response
induced by intravenous thiopental sodium.
The divergent observations reﬂect variations in methodology. The present study is
an attempt to apply quantitative methods of
analysis of serial electroencephalographic
records to this problem. The purpose of this
study is to determine (1) the relation of
changes in electroencephalographic delta
activity to the behavioral response in electro—
shock, and (2) if a relationship does exist,
the signiﬁcance it may have for an under-standing of the electroshock process.

Subjects and Method
1. In the initial series, 24- consecutive patients referred for electroshock were studied. Electro—
encephalograms were obtained prior to treatment
and at weekly intervals during and after treatment,
using an eight—channel Medcraft electroencephalograph and needle electrodes. Recording was bi—
polar, and hyperventilation activation was utilized

516

,.

“(34.x

�EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
during each recording. During the treatment pe—
riod, records were taken on the day following a
treatment, generally 25 to 31 hours later.
Grand mal electroshock therapy was administered
by staff psychiatrists, using a Reiter C-47 electrostimulator. Treatment schedules were three times
a week, and the number of treatments varied from
9 to 33. As patients showed a clinical response,
the psychiatrist tended to give fewer and more
widely spaced treatments. There were 15 women
and 9 men in the series, and the ages ranged from
24 to 68, with a median of 47 years.
Evaluation of EEG Records—A total of 160
records were obtained on these subjects. Following the suggestion of Strauss,17 the delta index was
determined for three lead combinations (frontal—
parietal, anterior temporal-vertex, and parietal-ear
lobe) for 60 seconds of recording for each lead.
The delta index is deﬁned as the percent time
occupied by waves of 7 cps or slower.
The run of each selected lead combination was
scanned, and 180 cm. (60 seconds) of recording that
was artifact-free was noted. An additive map
measure was run along the base of all waves of
7 cps or slower, determining the number of centi—
meters occupied by such slow activity. The ratio
of this ﬁgure to 180 was the delta index of that
combination.

’

After these measurements were made, the rec—
ord was scanned for the slowest frequency clearly

The total record was also scanned
for burst activity. The duration of burst activity,
the regularity (modulation) of the waves in the
burst, and average voltage were noted.
In the ﬁnal estimates of degree of delta activity,
the average delta index for the three lead corn—
binations, the highest delta index in any one lead,
the slowest frequency, highest delta voltage, and
duration of longest period of burst activity were
listed for each record. The 160 records were ar—
ranged in sequence for each index and the per—
centile rank determined. The ranks were added
and the records then arranged in rank order ac.—
cording to this score. On the basis that the higher
score reﬂected a greater degree of delta activity,
the upper third of the records was classiﬁed as
“high—degree delta”; the middle third, as “moderate-degree delta,” and the lowest third, as “lowdegree delta.” An example of each is shown in
Figures 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
High—degree delta records were characterized
by an average delta index of at least 18%, a delta
index of 21% or more in one of the three measured leads, a slowest frequency of less than 3%
cps, a highest delta voltage of more than 100pv,
and a burst duration of at least two and a half
slow waves.

LF-LO

WWWAWWWNIWW

WWW
RF'RO

LAT- LPT

WWWVWWW
RAT-RPT

WWW/WWW
PRE-EL

seconds.

Low-degree delta records were characterized by
an average delta index of less than 2%, a highest
delta index in one lead of 3% or less, frequencies
no slower than 5% cps, voltages of less than 60pv,
and burst duration of less than one—half second.

W
“WW
W
W

identiﬁed at least twice in these selected lead
combinations, and for the highest voltage of these

R P‘E
AMNVWWWNVW

L F _ LO
«wanjVMImWW-ﬂm

WMWMWMMW

RF- RO

awmwwm

WW

LC-LMT

LC-LMT

RC-RMT

“WW

RC-RMT

LP-E

WWW

WW
RP-E

RP‘E

WWWNAMMMMMWMW

WWW
WWW

LAT' L PT

LAT-LPT

RAT-RPT

PRE- ELECTROSHOCK

ISECOND

,

24 HOURS AFTER EST

Fig. 1.—Low-degree delta activity.

Fink—Kuhn

I50 M,

it l2

5-17

.

‘

WWW
RAT-RPT
WWW

PRE-ELEC

.maﬁ-”

_,__._---_.,

__..-_t

r-.-

518

�vs

WWWWﬁ

.,

.v.

h

A. M. A.

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

LF LO

WMWWWWWW
WWWWWWWW
LC-LMT

WWW

RC-RMT

LP-E

KEN-W

LAT- LPT

WWWWWNWWNWMNA

W
WWW»!
I

RAT RPT
VWVWWNWWWWWWNwWV‘WWW/wm

PRE-ELECTROSHOCK

24

HOURS

SECOND

1:5on

AFTER EST 4*

IO

Fig. 2.—Moderate-degree delta activity.

L F “ LO
WWEJVANWWWJWWWMk/‘W‘mgfaNJWW‘AMW
R F - RO

JVWMWWWWAW

WWW
LC'LMT

RC-RMT

LP-E

WWW-”WW
.

RP-E

WWW“
LAT- L PT

WWW
RAT-RPT

PRE-EL ECTROSHOCK

WW

ISOMV

WWW/meﬂwx
24

HOURS AFTER EST 4*

M

Fig. 3.—High-degree delta activity.

518

Vol. 78, N07J., 1957

�EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE

I

Moderate-degree delta records were between these
two groups, with an average delta index between
2% and 18%, a highest delta index in one lead of
3% to 20%, a slowest frequency of 4-5 cps, high—
est amplitude of between 60yv and 90,uv, and burst
duration of one-half to two seconds.
2. In a second series, of 54 consecutive, unselected electroshock patients, electroencephalo—
graphic records were obtained prior to treatment.
during the second and third weeks of treatment,
and two weeks after treatment.
These records were analyzed using measures
identical with those in the initial series. Using
the original cut-off points, these records were
classiﬁed as high-, moderate—, and low—degree—delta
records, and the initial observations were tested in
a predictive study of therapeutic response.
Evaluation of Clinical Response—All patients
were observed for at least eight weeks after termination of therapy. The patient’s response to
electroshock was determined on the basis of the
resident psychiatrist’s impression, the staff opinion,
the nurse’s notes, and the clinical evaluation of the
supervisor in charge of electroshock. The patients
were divided into three groups—much improved,
moderately improved, and unimproved—according
to the following criteria:
A. Much Improved: The 11 cases in this group
were regarded as showing recovery or marked
improvement. These patients no longer presented
the symptoms which brought them into the hospital; their doctors felt they were better, and the
nurses’ notes conﬁrmed such aspects as being able
to sleep without medication, better appetite, and
improved capacity to get along with others and
participate in hospital activities.
B. Moderately Improved: The six patients in
this group showed some improvement but continued
to manifest symptoms of mental illness. These
patients typically showed symptomatic relief; i. e.,
acute depressive features might be gone, but the
dramatic change, so evident in the ﬁrst group,
was not apparent. Each patient continued to show
some noticeable disturbance, such as obsessional
thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
C. Minimally or Unimproved: In this
group
were placed seven patients in whom change was
not clearly noticeable, who showed equivocal or
transient changes, or who became worse. They
showed ﬂuctuations in behavior, at times appearing
less ill. The changes were not sustained, however,
so that by the end of treatment they appeared
much as before.

activity and clinical ratings demonstrated a
signiﬁcant relationship between the early ap—
pearance of high—degree delta activity and the
“much-improved” clinical ratings. Of the
records in patients who were rated as much
improved, 80% were classiﬁed as high—de—
gree delta in the second week, 91% in the
third week, and 88% in the fourth week of
treatment. Of the records in patients who
were rated as unimproved, none showed
high—degree delta in the second or third
weeks of treatment, and only 20% were
classiﬁed as high—degree delta in the fourth
week. The data are expressed in Table 1
and graphically in Figure 4.
TABLE

1.—Electroencephalographic Percentage of
High-Degree Delta Records

Degree of EEG Delta Activity and
Clinical Ratings.——The initial analyses of the
relation between the degree of induced delta
F ink—Kahn
1.

MUCH IMPRO
+——Moo. IMPRO\

50_ .---- UNIMPROVEI

TIME

A ‘13
A.

4‘“
PERCENT

o: C?

-.__~_

,.

m &lt;.3
AVERAGE

...__.—_____.-._,

c3
MEAN

WAVES

I50} .—- MUCH
+——Moo.

IMPROVI
IMPROVI

---~ unmpnovso
DELTA

Treatment
Period

Much improved (11)

OF

1-8

4—6

7—9

10—12

25

80

91

88

Moderately improved (6)

0

16

50

40

Unimproved (7)

0

O

0

20

IOOAv

AMP(LITU)DE

u- c.’

HIGHEST

Indices and Clinical Ratings.——An
analysis of the relation between each of the
ﬁve indices used in the ﬁnal estimate of the
degree of delta activity and the clinical ratings also show signiﬁcant correlations. In
Figure 5A to E, each index is related to the
number of convulsive treatments and the
eventual therapeutic evaluation. The curves
2. Delta

OOACTIVITY

90.
80-

DELTA

MUCH IMPROVED

.—— M00.

(III

IMPROVE-10(6)

._-— UNIMPROVEDU)
‘

70'
60‘

DEGREE

504
HIGH

40‘

20I

0‘

o.
O

/

'\.

/

3O~

PERCENTAGE

Results

DELTA

/

I-3

/

/

'

/
4-6

__/'
7-9

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

MEAN

L

Fig. 5.—A-E, rt
each index of delt:

'

\\
/'

/
IO'IZ

Fig. 4.—.Re1ation of clinical ratings to development of high—degree delta activity.
519

for the highest—am
5C) and the slow
are most similar tc
of delta activity (
The other three
clearly differentia
group from the p2
520

�/\

A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
f3
__J

g

. MUCH IMPROVEDUJ)
IMPROVED (-6)
50_ pgmoo.
o----UNIMPROVED(7)

&lt;
60’3

.

w

2 40-

E

,:

PD 4

z

as.

8

a:
ling

a: 30m

a.

aLu
&gt;
‘1

qz
m
2

-

lO-

.

_,e-’::.—//

0

"5'

.V

/

U

3
:5

.J,
Lu

o

a-

//’

53

a
+—

m
u:

I

I9Z
&lt;

g

O

0

________-_

. ..........

_______

o
8

g
2
3

g 4§

E

g.

x «e

—«'

w
D-

W to

5
onZ

I

4-6

’

T

7-9

"

IMPROVENS)

.._.. UNIMPROVED(7)

'

T

IO-IZ

'

-. '
—-—:—-—-"/

,,«+

/
/
/
{,x’
”x”

5~

.t’ ----/’/
,./ "

/‘ ,xf

“i3u
Q

(ll)

MUCH IMPROVED

o——MOD.

Z
6-3
IL]

+,.__._-,——‘

0—

3-

6-

a2

.
1—3

I

7-9

----'

C

OK.

100-

50-

'

4—6

IO-‘IZ

I50- ._Muc|-.1:|MPROVED(II)
+——MOD. mpnovsom)
,_.- ummpaovso m

0

IL

V" T

I

_.

7-9

A

&lt;&gt;K

//i1/

------- °- -----MA’65...

x
2
1m
5

NUMBER! OF TREATMENTS

(I)

.
///
//
i

2
.

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

4-6

1-3

3

‘2

/+
,, ........... .,
-—-“"”
’4'

,

‘

A -------2’

a:
I
l—

// /"

20

o

IMPROVED(II)
0--MO‘D. IMPROVED (6)
°~--~U~NIMPROVED(7)

LU

p—

{‘3

-— MUCH

m
D

.

o

‘‘‘‘‘
————

-4ﬁ‘”

415
1-3
719
NUMBER OF TREATMENTS
7

r

D

I0--I2‘

NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

B

.9.

g

7‘

3a:

6‘

m
n:
lL

,

.9
,r—e
'

-— MUCH IMPROVED

(u)

+——MOD.IMPROVED(6)
o----UN‘IMPROVEO(7)

l0-l2

'\.

I

A
.m 5..

22

9 8 4—

.—

Fig. 5.—A-E, relation of clinical ratings to

each index of delta activity.

33.

3:

3o V 3-.

z

a
2

2a
l

_

. I”
+’/”
//’
“““ ---------- o-"""
.ﬁu‘idiﬁ“
,

a

_

O
O

”_‘..—°V

°

I

‘l

‘l

l.

l-3
4.96
7-9
IO‘IZ
NUMBER OF TREATMENTS

E

for the highest—amplitudedelta activity (Fig.
5C) and the slowest frequency (Fig. 5D)
are most similar to the curves for the degree
of delta activity (Fig. 4).
The other three indices (Fig. 5A, B, C)

clearly differentiate the much improved
group from the patients with the other two
520

ratings, but fail clearly to distinguish the
moderate and unimproved groups. With in—
creasing treatment, however, the separation
of classes becomes clearer.
Each index of delta activity, therefore,
demonstrates a relation to the eventual short—
term clinical rating which is much like that
Val. 78, Nov., 1957

�EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
TABLE
I

i/

"

.

”

Average delta

2.—Interc0rrelati0ns of Individual I ndices and Degree of Delta Activity
-

-

Average

63%qu

Longest
Dﬁﬁiéi‘é“

350831153

+0.72

+0.67

+0.80

+0.72

+0.68

+0.84

—0.78

—0.47

-—0.90

Delta

One Lead

FkZVJSEEy

Aﬁié’ﬁiie

-

+0.98

—0.79

_

Degree

Highest delta in one lead

+0.98

_

—0.67

Lowest frequency
Highest amplitude

—0.79

—0.67

__

+0.72

+0.72

—0.78

--

+0.57

+0.88

Longest duration bursts

+0.67

+0.68

—0.47

+0.57

__

+0.63

Degree of delta activity

+0.80

+0.84

—0.90

+0.88

+0.63

--

demonstrated for the combined index of de—
gree of delta activity.
The intercorrelations of each of these in—
dices are shown in Table 2. All correlations
are signiﬁcant at better than the 1% level of
conﬁdence, although the highest correlations
with the degree of delta activity are noted
for the frequency and amplitude measures.
The lowest correlations are noted for the
duration} of burst activity. These observa—
tions indiCater that in future studies or in
clinical application frequency response and
amplitude changes may serve as criteria for
the degree of induced delta activity.
3. EEG Delta Activity as Index of Clinical
Outcome—Following these observations, a
study was undertaken to determine whether
the degree of delta response was predictive
of the short—term therapeutic outcome. On
the basis of the observation that the much
improved patients had developed high—degree
delta activity early and had sustained such
activity, electroencephalograms were obtained during the second and third weeks of
treatment 011 54 consecutive electroshock
patients.
The records were scored as to whether
high—degreedelta activity was achieved dur—
ing both, one, or neither of the four—six and
seven-nine treatment periods, and the data
TABLE

were

Both high

(18)

12 (67%)

One high

(16)

4 (25%)

None high (20)

6 (30%)

*

(Table 3).
Of the patients who manifested high—degree
delta activity during the second and third
weeks of treatment, 67% were rated as much
improved, while only 30% of patients with-

.

1

out high—degree delta activity were so rated.
Thus, the early induction and persistence of
high-degree delta activity are seen to be re—
lated to the short—term clinical evaluation.

Comment
The present study demonstrates a con—
sistent relationship between the degree and
duration of induced electroencephalographic
delta activity and clinical evaluation of behavioral change. While it is conceivable that
the difference between our results and
previous reports may be due to a variation
in population, it is more likely that methodo—
logical aspects are important factors. Serial
records were obtained during the course of
therapy, so that the sequence of electro
encephalographic change was evident. The
records were obtained at a constant time in—
terval following a treatment. Finally, quantitative analyses of the records were made
instead of relying on clinical impressions.
Of other investigators of this problem, both

Moderately Improved

2 (11%)

8

(50%)

4 (25%)

7

(35%)

7

T

ship between ind
havioral
respor
therefore, perm
changes in the o
attendant alterat
the physiologic
process.* A simil.
by Roth 23 on the
*The

Unimproved

4 (22%)

ac’tivity.18’21’22

we.

biochemical

received limited stu

on acetylcholine-chi
tion in blood—brain
and protein equilibri
without deﬁnitive C(

(35%)

Signiﬁcant at the 2% level of conﬁdence.

Fink—Kuhn

the induced neu1
behavioral respoi
these observation
of action of elect
1. Relation ofi
Behavior.—Beha
accompaniment
function. Chang
tude, judgment,
and insight atten
tion, from what
extensively docu
literature.
In this study, e
consistently to alt
in a fashion whic
with states of altc
studies of Davis
Strauss,19 Ostow
have afﬁrmed the
activity as an in&lt;
tion. Symmetric,
has been interpre
tion of midline
centrencephalic s
also indicative oi
of consciousness
being directly rel:
tude, and freqi

related to the clinical evaluations.

Clinical Rating

Much Improved

21

further elaboratii

3.—Patients with High-Delta Activity During Second and Third Weeks of
Treatment*

EEG Delta

Roth 2 and Hoa
out systematic E
to demonstrate
variables and be]
Two aspects oi

521

522

�A. M. A.

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

Roth 2 and Hoagland et al.,16 who carried
out systematic EEG analyses, were also able
to demonstrate a relationship between EEG
variables and behavioral changes.
Two aspects of these observations warrant
further elaboration: the relation and role of
the induced neurophysiologic change to the
behavioral response, and the signiﬁcance of
these observations for a theory of the mode
of action of electroshock therapy.
1. Relation of Neurophysiologic Change to
Behavior.—Behavioral change is a consistent
accompaniment of alteration in cerebral
function. Changes in mood, language, atti—
tude, judgment, thought process, perception,
and insight attend changes in cerebral function, from whatever cause, and-- have been
extensively documented in the neurologic
literature.
In this study, electroshock has been shown
consistently to alter the electroencephalogram'
in a fashion which we have come to associate
with states of altered cerebral function. The
studies of Davis and Davis,18 Ostow and
Strauss,19 Ostow and Ostow,2‘0 and Jung 21
have afﬁrmed the signiﬁcance of diffuse delta
activity as an index of altered brain func—
tion. Symmetric, dysrhythmic delta activity
has been interpreted as evidence of dysfunc—
tion of midline hypothalamic centers—the
centrencephalic system?9 Such activity is
also indicative of an alteration in the state
of consciousness, more marked alteration
being directly related to the duration, ampli—
tude, and frequency of the slow—wave
activity.18'21’22

The demonstrated relation—

ship between induced delta activity and beafter electroshock,
havioral
response
the
conclusion that
therefore, permits
in
the
centrencephalic system with
changes
attendant alteration in consciousness are
the physiologic basis of the electroshock
process."&lt; A similar conclusion was presented
by Roth 23 on the basis of his studies of the
*The biochemical substrate of this process has
received limited study. Emphasis, has been placed
on acetylcho-line-cholinesterase change,”25 altera—
tion in blood-brain barrier,8 and changes in ionic
and protein equilibria 26"” by different investigators,
without deﬁnitive conclusions.
522

effect of thiopental on electroencephalo—
graphic delta activity.
Another example of the relation of the
electroencephalographic delta activity to be—
havior is seen in reports of epileptic patients.
Landolt 28,29 describes a young epileptic who
was ordinarily pleasant, friendly, and cooperative for his clinic visits. At these times,
records were consistently dsyrhythmic. On
one occasion he was surly, irritable, and
withdrawn, and his EEG was without delta
activity. On the subsequent visit, the EEG
was again dysrhythmic, and a behavioral
“improvement” was noted. Similar observations have been reported by Brockman .et
£11.30 and Fabing.31
In a previous study4 we had applied the
amobarbital test for brain disease 32 in a
serial fashion to this group of patients and
reported a relationship between changes in
this index of cerebral function and be—
havioral change. Were other tests of cerebral
function to be applied in a similar fashion, it
is anticipated that these, too, would demon—
strate consistent changes during treatment
and a relation to behavioral response, within
the limits of the sensitivity of the test to reﬂect changes in cerebral function. In this
context, electroshock may be said to be a
method of inducing a state of altered brain
function for extended periods, in order to
achieve changes in behavior.
From this point of view, the development
of a signiﬁcant degree of electroencephalo—
graphic delta activity may be a readily determined guide in the rational management
of electroshock therapy. In these studies we
have examined various delta indices and/or
the intercorrelations and have noted that the
amplitude and the frequency of the induced
slow waves are the best guide to the degree
of delta'activity. In patients in whom the
behavioral response to electroshock is inconsistent with the therapeutic expectation, examination of the electroencephalogram may
provide a criterion for clariﬁcation. If the
induced slow—wave activity is faster than 4
cps and lower than 100,u.v in anterior
temporal—ear lobe or anterior temporal—
frontal lead combinations, then there is
Vol. 78, Nata; 1957

�EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE

presumptive evidence of inadequate electro—
shock therapy. When frequencies less than
3% cps and voltages higher than lOOuv are
maintained for a number of weeks, the assumption may be made that an adequate
degree of altered brain function had been
induced and that other factors (environ—
mental, personality, pathophysiologic) were
operating to preclude a favorable behavioral
response to electroshock. A similar applica—
tion can be made for amobarbital tests 4 or
syntactic language after intravenous amobarbital.6
2. Theory of Electroshock Action—These
studies of the electroshock process have
demonstrated that alteration in brain func—
tion is induced early and is sustained in
patients in whom the greatest degree of
behavioral change is noted. We have em—
phasized high—degree EEG delta activity and
positive amobarbital tests as indices of
altered cerebral function, with the knowledge
that other indices of altered brain function,
applied in the same serial fashion, may also
show signiﬁcant alterations and a relation
to behavioral change.
We have been impressed that the ratings
of improvement are value judgments of the
behavioral response. All patients in whom
cerebral changes are induced by electroshock
manifest changes in behavior. The range of
behavioral patterns induced under these conditions is wide. Only certain patterns are
evaluated as improved, however, while
others are regarded as “unimproved.” “Improvement” is a special case of behavioral
response, being a subjective evaluation on
the part of the observer that the patient is
“better.” Electroshock does not induce “improvement”; it induces a milieu of cerebral
activity in which behavior is different than
before electroshock. To the extent that the
induced behavior in depressed patients is
perceived as less complaining, depressed,
agitated, or anxious, or in schizophrenic
patients as less delusional, hallucinatory, or
excited, the patient is evaluated as “im—
proved.” When behavior, however, is per—
ceived as anxious, agitated, paranoid,
complaining, or withdrawn, it is evaluated
Fink—Kahn

as “unimproved.” The particular type of
behavioral pattern induced by electroshock
is dependent on a number of factors, such as
personality.33
Another aspect of the rating of improvement is the environmental response to
the induced behavior. The modiﬁcation of
mutism, withdrawal, and negativism to excitement, overactivity, and irritability may
be considered a positive movement by the
therapist but a disorganization by the ward
physician or family. The goals of the
therapist and the family, and their expectations and tolerances, are signiﬁcant factors
in the behavioral response of the patient to
therapy, and, also, in the ratings of improve—
ment.
These same factors are signiﬁcant in the
duration of the electroshock effect. The in—
duced change in cerebral function persists
for only two to eight weeks following even
intensive courses of therapy. In many cases,
the behavioral response is limited to this
period of altered brain physiology. When in—
duced changes in behavior are not adaptive
in the milieu of the patient, the behavior
reverts to pretreatment patterns. In other
instances, the induced behavior is adaptive
to the environment, and, we assume, sus—
tained thereafter not by the initial change
in brain function but by the newly developed
interaction of ‘the subject with environment.
That this is indeed true is seen by the fre—
quent successful adaptation of the patient
to the hospital milieu after electroshock, only
to have a recurrence of symptoms when dis—
charge planning is discussed or discharge
is consummated. Altered brain function
provides the physiologic milieu in which
there is an altered interaction with the en—
vironment—the doctor, family, or society.
These observations lead to the conclusion
that electroshock therapy is a nonspeciﬁc
induction of persistent states of altered
cerebral function. Such altered cerebral
function provides the physiologic milieu for
an alteration of the organism’s adaptive
interpersonal behavior. Changes are in—
duced in perception, language, mood, recall,
and judgment which constitute a mode of
523

interaction with
of behavior indu
is dependent up
subject, the envii
action occurs, an
of altered cerebrz
A similar View
was initially exp
and Kahn,1 who
tionship of neu:
behavioral respor
electroshock pr0(
the observations
Aird et al.3
The neurophys
tion of electrosh(
deﬁnition of the
of further elabor:
a hypothesis also
standing of ther
coma therapy, 1(
agents.

j

Summary

Serial electroe:
weekly intervals
referred for elect
analyzed for the
A signiﬁcant
tween the degrec
delta activity an(
behavioral chang
ﬁrmed in a predi
54 patients.
Differences bi
those obtained It
terms of differen
A neurophysi
tion of the electrt
It is concluded t]
speciﬁc inductio:
altered cerebral
physiologic miliei
tive interpersona
Improvement
as a special case c
these conditions.
by an observer
factors, including

1

r'

524

�A. M. A.

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

interaction with the environment. The type
of behavior induced under these conditions
is dependent upon the personality of the
subject, the environment in which the inter—
action occurs, and the duration of the state
of altered cerebral function.
A similar view of the electroshock process
was initially expressed by Weinstein, Linn,
and Kahn,1 who emphasized the interrela—
tionship of neurophysiologic changes and
behavioral response. This description of the
electroshock process is also consistent with
the observations of Ulett et al.,34 Roth,2 and

Aird et al.3

The neurophysiologic—adaptive interpreta—
tion of electroshock provides an operational
deﬁnition of the process, which has promise
of further elaboration and observation. Such
a hypothesis also has application to an under—
standing of therapeutic process in insulin
coma therapy, lobotomy, and tranquilizing
agents.

Summary and Conclusions
Serial electroencephalograms obtained at
weekly intervals in 24 consecutive patients
referred for electroshock were quantitatively
analyzed for the degree of delta activity.
A signiﬁcant relationship was found be—
tween the degree and duration of induced
delta activity and the clinical evaluation of
behavioral change. The results were conﬁrmed in a predictive study in an additional
54 patients.
Differences between these results and
those obtained by others are explained in
terms of differences in methodology.
A neurophysiologic-adaptive interpreta—
tion of the electroshock process is presented.
It is concluded that electroshock is the non—
speciﬁc induction of persistent states of
altered cerebral function, providing the
physiologic milieu in which changes in adaptive interpersonal behavior occur.
Improvement after electroshock is seen
as a special case of behavioral response under
these conditions. The rating is an evaluation
by an observer depending on numerous
factors, including the type of adaptation, the
524

and

expectation of the observer
(therapist, family, or administrator), and
the setting in which the behavior occurs.

goal

Mrs. Helen Donovan, Miss Gayle Wankel, and
Mrs. Hannah Mosquera gave technical assistance
in this study.
Hillside Hospital.

REFERENCES

l. Weinstein, E. A.; Linn, L., and Kahn, R. L.:
Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy, Am. J.
Psychiat. 109 :22-26, 1952.
2. Roth, M.: Changes in the EEG Under Bar—
biturate Anaesthesia Produced by Electro—Coxnvulsive Treatment and Their Signiﬁcance for the
Theory of ECT Action, Electroencephalog. &amp;
Clin. Neurophysiol 3 :2612-80, 1951.
_
3. Aird, R. B.; Strait, L. A.; Pace, A]
W.;
Hrenoff, M K. and Bowditch, S C.: Neurophysiologic Effects of Electrically Induced Con—
vulsions, A. M. A. Arch Neurol. &amp;
Psychiatl- 75:
3371—3781956.
4. Kahn, R.L

; Fink, M., and Weinstein,,E. A.:
Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improve—
ment in Electroshock, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 76 :23—29, 1956.
5. Korin, H.; Fink, M, and Kwalwasser, 5.:
Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to
Improvement in Electroshock, Conﬁnia neurol. 16:
88-96,1956.
6. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communications, edited by P. H.
Hoch and I. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton,
Inc., 1956.
7. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Quantitative
Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following Electro—
shock, Electroencephalbgi&amp;-Clin. Neurophysiol. 8:

(abstract),

158

1956.

Pacella, B. L.; Barrera, E. S., and Kalinowsky, L.: Variations in the'Electroencephalogram
Associated with Electric Shock Therapy in Pa—
tients with Mental Disorders, Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 47:367-384, 1942.
9. Proctor, L. D., and Goodwin, J. E.: Clinical
and Electrophysiological Observations Following
Electroshock, Am. J. Psychiat. 101:797-800, 1945.
10. Bagchi, B. K.; Howell, R. W., and Schmale,
H. T.: The Electroencephalographic and Clinical
Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions in the
Treatment of Mental Disorders, Am. J. Psychiat.
8.

102 :49-61, 1945.

Levy, N. A.; Serota, H. M., and Grinker,
R.: Disturbances in Brain Function Following

11.

R.

Convulsive Shock Therapy, Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 47 :1009-1027, 1942.
12. Mosovich, A., and Katzenelbogen, S.: Elec—
troshock Therapy, Clinical and ElectroencephaloVol. 78, N00,, 1957

���mum m 3%:

«u

mmwgmwzum,mm

muJ.MiMMﬁW3MhWW
m
if
mwmum.
“

w.

Mr
maummwmmmmmd
W.
mam.
mm

W.

‘

����Wﬁmmmamhmmuwmmuw

(mﬁmumlmwmmumwmm

MQ}WW#WWWMWW
W“Nmmmuwmﬁummxmwmmmmm
Wan.

'meummmmm-umm m
MW‘Mﬂqumemmuw-ua
MW“
'

“-

MWWW

manna
a)

mxmmmmmmmwmm

�������I

‘1“

A—

�Wgwmmwmg MWMﬂmmmgw

MWmmtmmum4h
mwmm.
wmmamm.mwm«mm*

�����������.

v

,9

M»

ﬂ..V

4%5..

������..:
3 0%»
.4
4L,

“.4 .:‘

».:4,

J

�����«ﬂit

WWMM.

m

twmnmmmm

�����.14.

u

J,
wring

&gt;,R

�‘

’

,.

"M

:jﬁ"

W;

Walt

��W W M“ WWW!»

mu?Wmmm mm:

at W

mm: in.

{1.

a»

a)

mum at *1?" mm in
W WW;

W
m

m at

��77

was“W
r

I

€25” 0551:

(”n-hum or Inn-I
4

-5«-r.:.5“......”"55. {/7

m mu “$17115: to Word mm. in Whack:
wants." Serum. Studies
.

"v

a»

5,

g

an m HDandRoborbL ma. 3.5.5»
I:

M.
'

ﬂ

at mammal WW; Hillside Hospital, 01m Oaks,
truths
Want.
lbw but.
Aid-d, m m by gum. 14-927. mama mum. at Kent-.1 Health, mum).
of ﬁnd/m, v.3. mm Health San-1a.; and the mm mem
mum
for Mad. Ragnar-9h, nWJa-rlcM mt: ,
of mammeephalcmphoro, Won,
Present!!! aththe mum
Duct, WWI} 1955.
m: M57»
‘

'

.

'

“mm

.—

;

�Relation
5??

-.._..

a:
_

Meet

w
{Mari-ea

m, Delta Activiw to More}. mm in Wanna:
antiutive Serial Studies;

a: electroshock therapy

m

(

1,

2,. 3) have emphasized the

rule of neurophysiologic changes as the basis for the therapeutic

.1

.

mutant with these

,L

theories,

we have observed

auction

of

a mutual:

bum changes a: new means of brain function and behavioral name.
We

have noted
an...

$73

WW 40
electmsheek/‘aﬁ- changes in orientation
embarbital (2;), flaming and
&lt;6) .

null

and

clinical hpmment following
cmfabuletion after

111th

(Shana syntactical aspects at
'

1%

In view of these observations it. could be expected that. electroencephala
ogrephie shudiee mld
report-ad
inﬂamed

relationship.

Nmaerous observers have

eminent changes in the electmeneephelogm utter eleetzically

Mime.

rhyﬁMc

em 1 similar

utivity

There 18 6.1.th9 slewing with increased voltage and dye.

(7 ~ 12). Feet

percent—tum (13), and

utivity decreases,

both in voltage and in

in patients we are intensively trauma, there is e

naming of persistent alpha frequmcies (1h).

The

degree,

mum and extent

or éelte amenity is directly rented to the r'nquemy and amber of grand

ml
I

Wane (8 -- 11;).

Such

activity is usually swede, appears maximal
effects usually disappear

1:1meme

in anterior leads, and the
in ma mks renewing the 1m treatment-,3. 9).
In contrast to the comiateney or them observations, studies of the
relationship between the elmtmmephelogrephie and the dilated
conflicting menus. ohmic: and mean: (15). after an

mag”

show

mun review of

the literature, £9011ch that the amber er treatments rather then the degree
of named delta. activity we: the primry factor

pantie response.

011

the other hand,

rented to a fwomble there-

21qu 93 g}; (16)

:0pr a relation

how changes in the percent time feet eetivity (more than 13 cps) and

���.4...

In the rim]. estimates or degree of deli: activity, the average delta
index for the 3 load oombimtiono, the highest 3011:: index in any one load,
the ulwest frequency, Most delta. voltago and out-aunt: of longest period
of burst activity was listed for each macro. The 160 noorda were mangod
in aoquemo for one): index and the percentile ram: dotemined. The ranks wen
oddod and

the

the ﬂoor!!! than Imnged in rank order awarding to this score. a:

that the higher score refloctod a. grotto; agree of delta activity,
the upper third of the mom were classified as “high dogma
the middle mm 58 "mm. degree delta“ and the lowest third as ﬁlm dogmo‘
“main

dolu:~,

delta? .
ohmotorizod by an ﬂange delta index
delta 1mm of ‘2135 armors in one o! the three

High degree «sum record- wore

of at. least. 18%; a

mound

1m;

voltage mm
second»,

w

slam“

frequency of loss than

m madman;

m: a

Inn-at.

3 3/1;

ops;

highest

mu

mum of u least 2 1/2
‘

Low

degree dorm noords was characterised by an

loss than

2%;

slower than

S

meat. delta

1m in one lead of

1/2 ops; volt-.93 loss than 60

loss than 1/2 nomad. ’Hodornto degree delta
groups with an
60-80

20%;

Mormons; and

31m“ from

Inn-at

indoor or

or 1am mquanom no
naming and burst duration
3%

room-do won Minoan ”lose two

mugs delta index between 2% and 18%;

no load of 3 to

mugo delta

‘

mm ﬁnite 3mm in

of h-S cpl; highest amplimdo bemoan

duration of 1/2 to

2

seconds.

fiftyafour omomtivo, unselected electroshock patients, oloctmonooplulogmphic records worn obtained prior to trustmne, during the We! and third weeks of treatment, and tam weeks after
13)

In

a.

second aortas of

mama‘s.
mesa rooonin were

mlyud

using:

the identical

moms as

in the initial

����W

degree

the” %%Ru.® was

WW3 to datamine whether the
at delta response was Mauve of the short bum theramutic cum.

m the baéis of thﬁ observation that the much improved panama had dweloped
high dtgrae delta #ctivity unﬁt-1y and had. sustained such activity, chew
mamalogms ware obtained tinting; the second and third weak: of mutant in

pltiants.
The records- were Scored as ta whether high degree dolta actiut‘y was
acldwed timing; both, on: or with: of the h—é and 7.9 treatmnt pariah,
the data was muted to the clinical evaluatimm (Table III).
Sh

eonsecutiva electroshock

and

mm III

'

‘

EEG

man

Delta.
_

(18)

Both High
One

mgr;

..

“Home High

(16)
(20)

f

who

pntienta without.

mm

W
2 (113)

12 (67%)

h (225‘)

u (292:)

a (sex)

h (25;)

6 (30%)

7 (35%)

7 (355)

//

anwx‘uaummm,m

M down delta activity?» rated. M, the surly 1n-

ducbion and persisteme of mg; dogma delta

the short mm. clinical

4»

Moderatelx

manifest high degree delta activity during tha second and
onlgrBOSof
attainment.

or the patients

'mm

-

ma

activity is seen to be related

multim

Meant at the m1 of cmm.
2%

to_

��J

We

“WWW“

1111111111:

delta activity has

m integrate as evidence of dysfunction at

manna centers {mtmmphmc systoml (19) .

mpothalandc and

Such

activity is also indicatim of an alteratim in the cuts of consciousness,
with more marked alteration being directly related to this duration, mum.

activity (If, 21, 22). me dmstmted roala‘bianchip between induced delta activity and behavioral response after electric

and tmquency of the slow wave

hint- conclucion that. changes

shock, themfom , permits the

cephnlic

3513mm

with attondant. alteration in conscimmnesa

basis of the electroshock pmccas.
m the basic cf his stwiea of the
Another example of the

behavior

is tut-h

seen

£81

~11

A

‘

11.:1‘rect
.

M

of

me

b

visits.

cooperativefar hie

01.111111

MW”.

occaa11m be

was

1153110111;

mic

9.1213

:1

ported by

we

delta activity,

belmvioral

On

At.

an

WW
$133114.

(23)
'1'?—“1/1'54"?

W 55130)

reports of epileptic patients. Landon

ordimrlly pleasant, fﬁendly and

them times, records

the subsequent

and
118

warn

mimuy

unit,

Similar

was mated.

ram

111111

the

EEG

was again ﬁgsrhyth-

obaomtionaﬁ ﬁre?”

(31).

applied the

Maximal test 101» brain

h
nthembml

serial fashian to this group of patients, and
reporwd
a mlatiomhip between changes in this index
fwtion and
behavioral changci. Herc Other tests of ccmbml {metion to be applied in a
disease (32) an a

31:13::

331131

fashion,

11'.

is anticipated that thou, tab,

would demonstrate

bicchmcal substrate of this process has received 11mm: cm
placed 011 acctyldlommholineatemse changes (2 ) (25),
W818 has1nbean
blooMrain
barrier (3) and chasm in ionic and pmtoin
nautical
(£6)
(2{)
diffcmnt
by
aquilibria
investigators, witho 1t definitive: con-

it The

13111810113

.

m surly, inﬂame and withdrawn, and his 1%

”13111101791331”

In a prcvionl atudy (h)

wwé‘gm

relation Iof clactmcnceﬁulograpmc delta to

(28) (29) describes a young synaptic: who was

011

the Gem-im-

% the pigsiclcgic

mansion

similar

3.11

���«18‘
{gnawing

mu intents.“

name is

courses of therapy. In

limited to this

40f

,peziari

many

cases, the behavioral

altemé! brain phys‘iolégz'f.

When

induued

in behavior are net. aﬁaptive in ﬁhe mien of the patient, £16: behavior
be pwmamm patterns. In cther instances, the induced behavior is
Idaptive to the environment, and, we assume, sustained thereaﬁer not. by the
changes"

mm

in brain function, but by the newly dmleed interaction at M2
subject with envirmmnt. Theft. miss is indeed true is sea: by the fremwnt
suscaasm adamuon at the patient to we hospital milieu after electroshock.

initial

only

change

to We a marten-ea of

symptoms when discharge planning

is

discussed or

is mummied. Altered brag». function provides the Manage
Mm: in which there is an altered hibernation with the environment -- the
diIcharge

doctor, famﬁly er society.
I

These
’

obm’cim

lead to the canclusion that electroahack tirxerapy

ﬂﬁmum

Such
Wyenﬁfic induction of persistent states of altered
altemd mm; hid. rum um provides the physiologic milieu for m: altera-

a
-'

tion of the organism‘: adaptygtexfgersoml behavior.

in

pemwp’oion.

“a

Changes

WW3,W, mé‘m, and MW: which

Max-scum with the ‘mirmn‘o.
Mead ms:- than oonditim is deg-3mm

I

is

The type of
upon

are induced

m

constitute

31 new

behavior

the personality of the 813123“,

the environment in which the interaction occurs, and the duration of the

stat.

cf altered cerebral function.
A

similar

View

of the electroahock pmeesa ﬁas initiélly expressed by

rm and Kuhn

Heimtein,

Minibar:

(1),

who

mﬁmaized the interrelationship of

changes and behavioral msponse. This doseription of ma

shock pmoess is also consistent with the observatians of Ulett
Roth (2) and Aird
(3).

533

new
electro-

$3; (31:):

gig}.

Th5

meioloMptim

Mode.

interpretation of electmmock pmviaiea
m mutational definition of the pmaaa uhie‘n has promiaa of further 3mm

'

49’

�“on and

wax-mum.

_

Such

a.

a; Wilma
‘

standing of therapeutic procesa in

quillizing agents.

.

also has

appliuticn to

1mm coma therapy, lobobono'

an man».
ané

tran-

�«is.
J

‘
,

‘

1. Serial aloutmmoyhnlogmma

Waive

W

ohm!“

at many intervals in

patients Mama! for electroshock were quantitatively
for the degree of delta activity.
’

2.

215

W

aimifioant relationahip was found between the degree and aux-aﬂoat
of induced delta activity and clinical ”elation of behavioral change. The
results wen: confirmed in a meditative study in an additional 51: patients.
A

3. Diffemnooa between them results

and mono obtain-d by

others are

explained in toms of differences in m'modolow.

h.

A

mmphyeiologic

use is presented. It is
duction

-

adaptive interpretation: of the elootmshock pro»

concluded

that electroshock is the non-Specific in-

pomatantvatatea of altereri cerebral function, providing the
ogic 31113:; in inch changes in adaptive interpersonal batman: occur.
oi".

3. laymen)“.
maponz—ze

afar abotroshoch is

under those conditions.

"

The

seen

u

at 81300131

case of

#133191“

botanical

rating in an evolution by an observer

(lemming on numerous faahora, including the type of adaptation. the goal and

expectation of the observer (therapist, family or sminiatrator),
ting in which the behavior mm.

and

the set-

�4-43.6-

Acknﬂedgemnt :
We

wish to

Ranks]. and

m.

31pm: our asppreciation to Mrs. Hahn Ewan, Miss Gayle
Hannah
fer their mammal assistance in this study.

Wm

�~17».-

1. Weimtein, E.A., Ling
max-spy:

Psychiat.,

z.

MW

13., and Kuhn, R. .2 Psychosis During

Its Rahtion ta the
Log: 22.26, 1952.

"zeory

of

Elan-maxed:

J.

Shank Thempy, Am.
‘

'

Bui‘biturato Anesthesia Produced by
Changes in the
m:m, wmm:
Electra-convulsive Wmt and Their Significamo for the Theory
EEG

»

act Action, Em. (315.11. Neurophys" 33 261-280, 1951.
3. Aim, R.B., Strait, LA" Pace, Jﬁ'q Hemoff, 14.x. ind Witch, 5.0.:
of

ﬁe‘grophysialmc Effec'ta of Electrically Induced Gomulsions, Adidmam. a: Paychiat” 15.: 371-678, 1956.

Arch.

a;

3.5.: Relation a: mom-banal Test
to Clinical Imgmemnt in mctmmack, AJLA. Arch. Neurol.

Kahn, 3.1,... Pink, 5:. and Heinatein,

2;;

chum... 163 23.29, 1956.

S.

Hg Fink,

aR'Z'Efrim,

M.

to
Legging
19
1o

6.

Kahn, 3.1.. and Fink

Wt

and

Fur--

8.: Relation of Changes in Mmery and
Nasser,
in Electmahmk, Cont. Mauro]...
ya:

rm; Changes in

8M6,

Language During Electmshoek Therapy,

in “PSy‘chopathangy of Cmmication," Trumaaticns Amr. Psychopaﬂml. Lame” 1955, Gram: Stmttan, Raw York.
7. an», m. ané Hahn, Ram Quantimm Studies of Slaw wave Activity Faun£2

Elactmshock,

8.

1236.. 63.111.

Haumpkys" Q:

1538

(Ethan), 1956.

13.1." Barrera, 31.8. ant-3 Kalinowslgr, 2...: Variations in the Elect»
encephalogm Maociateé with Electric: Shack Theta: in Patients
with ﬁen’oal Eiisordern, Arch. neural. {é Psychiat” :1: 367-681;, 192:2.
9. Metar, Id)... and Goodwin, J.E.: Clinicnl and EleuhroMiologioal Observation! Following mammhmk, Am. J. Psychiat., 391.: $7.800, 1925..
33336113.,
'

3-“

10. Bagahi,
'

'11.

My,

3.211.,

Ewell, 3.33., and Somalia, 8.1.:

The Electreencepmlegrarphia

Clinical Effecta of Elegtrically Induaegi Comnlsicms in the
reament of Mental Disorders, Am. J. Paychiam, gag: 1&amp;9~é1, 1915.

HA... Beret... Km” and Grinker, R. Ru Disturbances in 3min
Function I“
ComlsiVe Shock ’Faerapj. Arch. fieurol. Pay1914-2a
MI
10094027,
plain.”

cum

12. Hamish A" and Katzenelbgen; 3.: Electmshock themm, 51mm. and
517'éacti‘oﬁgcehhalogmphic isms-Ems) J. Harv. ‘I Mani... Dis...
39, 9 we»

m:
‘

13.

24A. and “111mm 3.13.: Significance of Changes in Elect.
mm, alogram
Zhsults from Shock "therapy.
J.
chiat" 105 ,'
'va'hicit:

11045, 19%.

Am.

PB

��’19..
29.’ Landau, Ru Uber

)9

undw
Vemer-‘mm
W:- fur

zguatwdsbilder be:

PW3hmm$g 1?} 313‘331’

a

1mm,I'

19%50

schizophmxe

Neurologio mu!

Goo.
918178,
W”,
Related
Type of TrutG.A.:
to
Thaw
‘3erE} 97-10%a1956.
mnt, Confinia neurologica,

30»

Bm:m,.ﬁoJo Bmcm,

31..

Ming, IL: Personal cmmication,

.3:»:.

Veins’oein, ‘EJ... Kuhn, 1m... Sugaxman, Ink. and 1mm; 1“: The Diagmstic
Use of murbital "Sedan (”Am-tel sodium“) in Brain Disease,
Am. J. Psychiat" ngﬁsws’h, 1953.

ngaa 1n

JOC.’

Jaebbsm’
1956.

$16:

U...

'

Pemmuty raetor‘a 1n mum: Psapmae to
m,a.s
hilactroahock Tharapy, Gent. Kennel. (in prose).

Kahn, R.L. and

833%,

8A.,

Smith, K. and

thconvulsive

6

ham,

(3.6.: Evaluation of Convulsive and

Shock Therapies

W‘.’ at 79m,

1956.

Utiliniqg

2.,

Control. Group,

Am.

J.

�~20-

136mm

m

1.

Lou Dogma Delta

Activity

.

m

Figure 1.1.

Moderate Dogma Delta Activity

“M 3.11.

High Degree Delta Activity

Figum 1?.

Relation of Clinical Ratings to Development
of High Degree Delta Activity.

Figure v.0. - 6)

Ralation
Clinical Ratings to
Delta Activity.
(11'

ill-Ia

EAL-k

M Index of

�12.5553"

’53?!

$3.4

vii.
‘

'3

�HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT. TRAINING AND RESEARCH

75-59 263m:

STREET

GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

Flaws-ran: 3-7800

s. A. MILLER. M. D.
MEDICAL DIRECTOR

JOSEPH

MAURICE BAC‘HRIACH
ADMINISTRATOR

SHRON KWALWASSER- M. D.
ASSOC. MEDICAL DIR.

AN AFFILIATE OF FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK

�,

v—v—v

ﬂu

;

{'ZﬂA/C’

,

—

S’s/"- 4—'-J-{/

,

-:v»-

mm-

-- -&lt;

-

-

.»

,.

-

—~

:~- -~--7—

«—

u

«

,

v-«wy—

——

v~vn~~m~——.W»,M—-&gt;w—

yw—W “H's—WW

£46 4/? /7¢3

far]Flaw/t
M(",qu
”may
Webcw~aa M4£27%01;“,
6W
f5 Wm
awe/W
m Moxie/M

M
W
¢m MJM WM
W
’@.A.:f;4m
«4%

dw.;&amp;%-m/: Midang/fvaf
mam ”I‘M/MM 2/49“”{24414

WMMMWJW
M41; {W MWMM

W.

I,

r

�“qua-7 r.l_~- ".w. v

"/ﬂ/Wd'
Q/a

7

_.,;m,‘_&lt;,,,,,..ﬁ_

.mm. uvr...“

4

¥

77“..

,,

Va-

.._

,

"W,

,V

_._

.—-.~

.,.

V

.7

.,,.‘

;....-

.

,

.:__,&lt;W

dag ,u/

W
WM
W
M
‘

_

,_.,.

.

.

,

qr, .._.;

x7443

A4414M4M

7’7

’

“ 74'

m
WW/M

.W We!

l..—

my

MAJ
WM
W
M
:W mm
_

.

(NV,

Aux-5&amp;2; 7

ﬂ
£;W

Jar/tamed

4

Ztaw a

M..WA
2/ M44."

64;“..“4

92%]

”(“44ng l/amﬂv,

(I

,

�.

_. ~...v.;.,

,

r“...—

E

,

.

V

~,~~—~

,

»-

.

“-‘"‘ «(y—av“ .v.

.r-

.

'-»v"l|‘-—

‘

m

n: “0..

3—wW-u—e-wr-—7-- -.—v,~u-W~v-.- "vV—Z‘V:

‘(Wﬂm twrﬁ'wwuml"fw W?“ W" rw-Dv' ,.,...,.:-_“tum-“warm“. numwx-cunmvrp-w

-

-

,

.

r

_

‘

~

‘

_

.

‘

.

x

{

.iimgulvms

fJW (luv/W 34:: 7&amp;9};
,

'

T.

_@_ALW

~

19“ 7M4

@

%

;

E

sifﬂm

AA“

W’Vwrﬂ Q
25%!

\

:22.

,

34/..46/

’55 ”5.

?W
\

ﬂ)
3’5

£7),

(9

/,¢

@

136"?)

472
46

_
w

‘

"Q

415’

77
9L:

C
'

17/44.;

a’J’
.36.

"
ﬂ

--

gt

M
MW W
W4
._

,

g

.

I

_/

”/W

"

61’2"

«I

(

,

.1

M‘éw/ﬁ 5m:

MIL/{7%

#5?

AMW

5

�W,“ -W’
/
I/WﬂAz/WW
mMﬂAMé-wcwr

W
/W49MM/4~J
I

a]

'1

W
.3/W//hﬁWM/MZW
”DZ/We

I;

J
l

Wamumﬂﬁﬂiw
M
//

4/”ﬂ‘dmﬂéWu-éﬁ/u4em 149W
In, wmwwgw
MVéW
Z74,
Owd’éwdlmmmﬁk
/

V

.

’

�MZLW'W~V
//

�1

. am,”

..
‘

‘

:"!~n\vJ-A-;—eru€m

9

ﬂ:

@LIfWQLJ-y

3

‘

Stay.

¥

5

0W , May/M919».[4999;
“H“ ‘5‘“44:7; /
)3”
aQ/VéiW'
:9)an or“,
J
*

¢)(I\3&amp;6H¢M

:3)

4)

5’)
.

"

“MM

JV

V

.

(NWQI’
607-:

.

f
5

——-i

44:4".

1/”?

.93 {7'47

5

4-09

Q‘QV

010'

2-5

W
M?i
9

”Lama;
fate. 'Mo

7

.

A

We», and

f§

41172:”)

{WV—9‘83“

f‘ﬁ’J’bOw‘f'

mm

x"

(I

M )v‘é"

,

‘

m

O

.1

1m

Maul/{4'

7

‘loAQ

141", m:-

.9th

Oics‘r- ovm’

MM
,

)&lt;

V

ﬂu,

0/

‘

”(I
.

4.: (2274214

/

J

1-3/3“,

5

“7442...? {Z
1

E

”Hp

{£—

'

.
,

03k1—f.-0'/our/m;

J70 1494/ 0"”

,

.9 4999999 MW 4999

.

’

0
26m
’
{j‘u AU ~&gt;M
‘

”
if”)

46H

3/Wt
4

'

4' {M

""‘ﬂﬁ Fcfo

m‘,
”‘5 écfm—ag
*‘d"

+(m—c.

wwwwca‘
+Zwau$£
Wyw
W96
WWI—w W.
ﬂak/4':

100 900 M

lacy/o’ZWJA
5%,

.
__

@1993.

‘9?

(/2413

5:9?) nevi/M
a

Maw” 94»

‘

w

20-40

“71/”

MW
'

'

-_ 9

\

9.—

�(a

‘1,

SP

£59

a)Waé,¢dWI- $927 A w}: A;

�ﬁ

/

WI
”I

3(
EM!
I

L..,

ALAIZMA,

32}

W
'

,,

ﬂak

'

_———'—

-y{-¢7

'57-,“

«7.4/5.

’

,7

'W

II/ MM

m

n-

M5,

Mm AwemmM

44/

m

I“ * 4
30‘6“”{4/00“ X 1%
,1:

£199.42; 21/4 (“/0614va

,

,

V‘SIJ’Z-;/£WAo—4

WM“!
-‘Janm.

42‘41V/a'/7¢V

31.57 Via

w xcf/Zle/x /44/

W44

4!.

7794,;
‘

0” 52",“

W

m

M

104/

U

’60

FWuAAWI

W
f‘ (E.

.%_w2ré’ww1
Urn

_/fj/§/o

94d: éy/-5vé_

�042/

Mf677MM§ka
@w'

,)

)9

W

11.0,

dug/mm»
V

1%,,19/73».

A
WWW
AW/MW“
mWngsUﬁat/Lg, ‘4 M

M
MlefWWﬂ/L‘XW

W
Wséaz

W M»

Md

WW
+2637

'-

AAA/M4

M-M.é"/.2£

Wot/(WA

(WM

mam.

�(16)

3

5

ﬂth,

% Wk. MW
'
-

.

3

@3W Mr

WM

gge

,7

4%
W

A“ % W
twé WK
77'W754’WW

J
calm/(P6,,
(ii)

Wot/7! MA:

an

32AM“ a
(6}

W30

W

A;

1

¥

‘—

6&amp;3,“ A [ﬂ/t

“M” C,

“5&amp;7:

I

�LW

23m

W
(“’W

21%;.“

2

W15—

a.

éd// /7//

I

.

$5

(0)

/4,'

ﬂair!“ M (W

‘-"

(Axle—26‘)

W/Wr
d/ﬂmﬁ/Wﬂwxw‘

W4”-

(f)

kn/WK

A [OJ-W

[6}

gt/M W

(4717

(02/2

@WV4

=1

loo-WM

W2a..

23% 26/?

VFW

A"
,2

Amt“

E

�jW/MM/
r_

QawaQ/ducfﬁ
@ﬂ
)4)

1/)
,

3)

i

W
mgW

W551”

:M
/
H

MM? ge/fsf?
)krqu.

ﬁfth ﬂaw“

AﬁéﬂQ—m
Mﬂe

2:.
/

M
.

-

5/3;

”a“,

mgwk

/W&amp;”’V

:

�Bambi, B.

It, Emil,

R.

m,

and Schmidt, 3.13.8

inﬂated convulsions 1n the treatment of
triaaﬁly_1
1023‘
1]7 9

”The alwtroancaphalogmphia

effects

mad 3111113511

1:1li

an!

aim

disordem.“ém. J. Pqnhigt.

'

Barrera, St
American

J.

Egg and P866118, B:

In:

“EEG

finding! ”‘001amd

With

31Wtﬂ¢

therapy in patients with mental

333.: 206119ﬂ3.

3118.559}...

GOldtarb, W" Laughlin, J3 Ma;

8336.

Kiwﬁ’ H. Ea: ”P19163336.

1113111111

$193k

dimm.“

Shaﬁkdu VMO

Gottlieb, J.S., Ashby, PLO", and Kimble; L.L.:'mamamlogi¢ study of schimphn
min and depressim. IV. Ina
fluence of electriu cenmlaiva them on, the aodium mm]. reapmua of the saleabmencephalcgrm.‘ Am. J. Psychiat. 10 : 6869696§ 1958::
»

Harris,

Roma, W.A.:"ﬁsa of cur-are in mtraxol
mnmlaant timer: with
15 3 5376 £1 19111“
observations.” maniatric
Land

2mm, and Panama, E.

Wt

electmencephalograﬁxiu

England, Hr, whim,

Mum, and Cinema, D.E.: " me electroencephalogram

hypoglycemia and recovery."
7

J" Wigton,

Hughes,

Arena Neural.

Ward,

Am.

13., and

at 13816111312.

14.11., and Rims,

Jardon, F.:“Electmencephalogmphie studies on patimam meshing electm~shoek mamnt.”
19141.

“SWiamm of

L.F.:

«hmgas in thy alecmenecphu

ﬂagram whichmsult from

Each,

‘1'.

0.,

and

autumn, Ed

251.13..

Arch. Neural.
MO

“The

other

effact of benmdrine and

@2th

ant: upon the

(21mm Shank) EEGJIi'amatiun Pmc. 5:62“ 12%,.
8mm, mm, and Grinkar, 12.3.: Diaturbanaea in brain

pastconvulsiw
Levy,

therapy." 53:

shew}:

W.

ehiatu 50f 53§¥537g 12h3 8:

1mm, mm,

1'

Payehnt.

&amp;

m; J;

Haul, B; H0;

of

schizophrenics curing insulin
1202 559‘5791 3.9;};

Gottlieb, J.S.: ”Chang” in. the eleetmeneephalogrm renewing
insulin shack therapy."
Neural. and Page

and

«1.12.,

J. $1131.01.

as: ﬁgumg
_

Jg.P§Fdhiﬂta 105‘,h0*h53 19h5v

Knott,

,

mum

reﬂuxing wnmlsiw shack mummy.”

1:7:

1009402“: 192:2.

Go»;

Wu,

{

G; Rn, Pma‘bor, IN Dr; and

600%,

J“ E03

"Parallel psychologisal, psychiatria and Whalesinn). findings: in sahimphmnie patieats undar insulin ahcmk treatment." Am. J...
Psychiatr.» 933

1422-4129. 121:1...

lbriaﬁy, LB...

and

Siam,

573 112*.»718‘ 1913!.

maevich, A"

nut.

and,

shoal: therapy.” Arch. Neural. g

mint.

Katzenelogen, 8.x “meatmslmck therapy, alibical and

10?: 517620.
,

J. 0.: “Ehctmmeemalogmphm study of electria

1214 8.

encephalograpmga studiem

J.

03.ch
ant...

Mex-v. 5:

�«2.
Pacena,

B.

Bax-rm, S. W" and Kalinawaw, I“:

I“,

elwtzic‘ shank therapy or

?:

Hawk 1122 .

V498—

’

” Variatim in the 319nm.811661312310ng assaeiated with

patina with mm mm".
,

60
m
.9341“;

is
_

_’

N.

.

Wt.

.

;

13m. and Goodwin, v1.8.3

tit)”

mm

‘.

andﬁliactmuﬂxyaiologiaal churnefanwm aleﬂmﬂhgakc M». J. ngaik‘bt
:“x

ilk

H‘

\

Ibsen, 8. R5, Samaria, L., and Finlay,
P3192»

11

(315.113.1331

101: 79%3094L 19kg;

111nm.

'

J. Ea Camativq tlwtmeneemalogtmhia abs
serrations / gnawing electroahaek therapy
Am J.and
alternating
unidimctmm ﬂuematmg
m1:
5'

using

Proctor,

trim

1

'

i

13.30.; and Goadwln,

Proctor,

Harold: VP:

Arch.

mm,i

@533 . 1.7.; 617.6111,

conservative approwh to ﬁne

111%

uhq of sneak therapy in

1M;
‘

mm

arggi‘ijd Suthﬁrlmd’ Gt Fa:
was experience with alwtric:
aback treatment in mental (mama-35, with $963.91 regard to vamua psychowmtie
99:
phenomena and to certain elcctmteahniaal “Worm”? Agni J.

531M,

W5»;

ﬁllet-350:1, K. JV,

6111133511, Wk"

" A eonsic‘haratim‘ M

Mint;

Pacella,

La 'me aigmﬂicancegﬁnf abnormal elentmmﬁt$3ng; prior t6 electmmnmlsiva many.

Taylor, R.

34., and

Jr Nam.

‘8;
Manta may 1073 2204.23....

Mar,

.

51'.

B.

_

l
,

w. J”, Lewinger, L., and

Wail, A. A“ manager, :4. C‘:

l9 1‘

-

F

mdﬂeam,

thorapwtic result in amiaophrmim
’

‘

Am.

J uW

pmlecW»

3.2%}: eomlation or

J3

'ghwk eleetmenaephalagmm and

Win“ 1023 299‘ 1.9%

‘

._

,

'5

(,1

”Elaatmmeephalq/{gmkﬁﬁc studies renewing elwtrie
57-; 112"
aback therapy; #13:). Wenml. s:

mist.»

.:

3

(I

{V

l

l

.

\
I

‘

V

3
,

‘

1‘

‘2

l

‘

1

"x

\f.‘

1

.
'

‘a

I

L
‘

'

2%,

~
‘

\

‘

i

:
;

E

‘
i.

'

J

‘

l‘

‘*

a

‘

l
v

1,‘

2‘

‘2\

1

E

\

'1

.
6
w

f

‘

/

‘

,

,

4‘

‘.\

.‘
,

"V

{3‘
'

w'

l

4

i

i

4/

e

J

L

5

'

-’

I“
"7

,r
_

ii

e

:y

,

ﬂ
’1'!

,_

‘

Y

.
,

‘,

y

.

'

��1

'___,

Y?

3b

CW
#31

1416mm.)

W

2’

71ml afar}:

JJngtu/zw:
é/‘f

M

W
.39“.
5““

ww—w—WWWT
,

{EM-ﬁn. 7/ aux... GMM‘ ”£73
7;. 23/ , rfr3.

MM WWW; ﬂV/ZM
(36¢

3
—-—-—

W7

"

.,

@//

"

"

{If

557

nr—

j

’7’7

Ik

fer"

(”a“)

’&gt;’3

yum ¢7

i

Lﬂﬂyl :7 94,}, ‘/f,

557
'

[5/

f7

l007-/¢v§

’4’“ [7‘4“ ”3 ”7

-

9%

2/F/.

”I‘lfj

"

"

547+,4m7m «m
1‘-

l7

[%’/&amp;?Jﬂﬂ n/V‘é gédnw

awn-£5:H

"

If”

415(ﬂ/Ia 7"(K

O’ermlw

ﬁf:

7" w 7 W

1
4

o2? 3v

:

~———~r

.1

£143de

WI

,“d. _

L?

'

‘

I

T) Q -1

F8

‘

,4, ,1,

@1574”!

Jﬂm

'2

’1

wri-ryn

334/

m

;

"‘

“
:~
&lt;-

W
V

3K3»:

-;M
"

HJWAM

�Levy, N.A. and Grinker,

and
8.3., ”Electroencephalogranhic
and

ElectriC9llylln-

Clinical Studies Following Metrazol

.

duced Convulsime herany of Affective Disorders", Archives
of Neurology and Psychiatryh7, 19h2. 1009-1099.

L., "Variations
Pacella, g. L., Barrera,.3. E,, and Kalinowsky,
Electroshock
Therany
with
Associated
~in El’ectroencenhaloggram
Archives
of
Neurology
Disorders."
Mental
of Patients with
and Psychiatry A7, 19h2, pp. 367-38hk
Sﬂnon, A., Yeager, C.L., and Bowman, K. 5., "Studies in Electronarcosis Therapy IV EEG Investigationsﬂ' J. Nerv.and Mental'

Dis., 118, on.

131-1M33

"Clinical and Electrophvsiological
3..
Following ileotroshock". Am. J. Psych. 101,

Proctor, D., and Goodwind,
Observations

laué, pp. 7a7-8a0.
of Electricéghock TreatKarliner, W.,A "Neurolowic Comnlications
review." J. of Nerv. and Mental Dis. 107, on. 1-10.
ments:
Rosen, A. R,, Secunda, L., and Finley, K. H., "Conservative
In—
Mental
'

of Shock Therapy in
Illness,
Tracings
Before,
Electroenoenhalographic
of
cluding Study
Therapy".
Quarterly
r"sychiatric
and
After
ghack
,
During

Approach

17, 19h3,

to

Use

pp.6l7-6hl.

Turner, W.J., Lowinger, Lg, and_Huddleson, J. 3., "The Correlation
of Pro Electroshock Electroencephalogram and Theraneutic
Results in Schizonhrenics? Amer. J. of Psych. 102, lghg,
I

ﬁa+41?1 r8}+d*uw~

CZ-2§ (hﬁwt

lqﬁi

;

:ryfugzo a9m~ﬂ¢3
_

_

”—4“;

«-4

�’5?

[Evy—q“

..

x“.

7v

,

“aw—.77“

.

...,-._:$..

.1

,

.

fa?"

Em:

E».
\‘a

H

:1

.

.7

.

,

.

.

1

”way"-

,7

m

”V.

'55:

A“:

-

.

Pup-&lt;12:

‘

F.»

7“"

,s-n

,

Bagchi, B. K., Howell, R. W., and Schmale, H.T.:

"The

electroencephalographic

clinical effects of elecmental
disorders."Am. J. Psychiat.
of
treatment
trically induced convulsions in the
and

102: A9-61, 19A5.

Barrera, S. E., and Pacella,

B.

L.:

findings associated.with electric Shock
therapy in patients with mental disorders."

"EEG

J. Physiol. 133.: 206,71951.
Goldfarb, W., Laughlin, J. M., and Kiene,

American

H.

E.:."Prolonged.insulin shock."

Am.

J. Psychiat. 101: 827, l9h5.

Ashby, M.C., and Kinble, L.L.:"Pharmaoologic study of schizophrenia and depression. IV. Insodium
the
amytal response of the electfluence of electric convulsive therapy on
10h:
l9h8.
Am.
686-696,
J. Psychiat.
roencephalogram."

Gottlieb, J.b.,

of curare in metrazol
convulsant théerapy with
electroencephalographic observations." Psychiatric Quart. 15: 537—5h3, 19h1.
Hoagland, H., Rubin, M.A., and Cameron, D.E.: ” The electroencephalograms of
schizophrenics during insulin
120:
559-570, 1937.
Am.
J. Physiol.
hypoglycemia and recovery."

Harris,

M.M., and

B. L.and Horwitz,‘w.A.:"Hse

Pacella,

7

‘

Wigton, R., and Jardon, F.:"Electroencephalographic studies on pat—

J.,

Hughes,

Arch. Neurol.&amp; Psychiat. us:
_

7h8—7h9,

ients receiving electro-shock treatment."

l9hl.

Kennard, M.A., and Nims,

L.F.: "Significance of changes in the electroenceph-

J. Psychiat.

l9h8.

105:

Ao—AS,

alogram whichresult from.shock therapy." "'Am.“

Knott, J.R., and Gottlieb, J.S.: "Changes in the electroencephalogram following
insulin shock therapy." Arch. Neurol. and P532

chiat.

50: 535-537, l9h3

a.

Lennox, M.A., Ruch, T. C., and Guterman, B.:

"The

effect of benzedrine

and

Other chemical agents upon the
postconvulsive (Electric Shock) EEG."Feraration Proc. 5:62, l9h6.
Levy, N.A., Serota, H.M., and Grinker, R.R.:

‘Arch. Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat.

D7:

Disturbances in brain function
following convulsive shock therapy."
"

1009-1027, 19h2.

Neel, B. H., Dswan, J. G., Myers, C. R., Proctor, L. D., and Goodwin, J- E.:
"Parallel psychological, psychiatric and physiolog—
ical findings in schizophrenic patients under insulin shock treatment." Am. J.

Mo

_

Psychiatr.

98: h22—h29,

l9hl.

Moriarty, J.D., and Siemens, J. 0.: "Electroencephalographic study &amp;of electric
shock therapy." Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.
57:712-718, l9h7.
Nbsovich, A., and Katzenelogen,

Dist.

107: 517-530, l9h8.

8.: "Electroshock therapy, clinical and &amp;electroencephalographic studies. J. Nerv. lent.

V

�-2Pacella,

B.

L., Barrena, S.

W., and Kalinowsky,

L.:

"

Variations in the electro-

encephalogram assbciated with
electric shock therapy of patients with mental disorders. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiatric.
h? 367-38h, (March) 19u2.

Proctor, L.D., and Goodwin, J. E.:
using raw 60 cycle

alternating

Egychiat. 99:525-530, 19h3.

and

Comparative electroencephalographic ob-

serVations following electroshock therapy

unidirectional fluctuating current.

J.
“““‘
Am.

observaProctor, L.D. and Goodwin, J.E.: Clinical and electro-physiological
Am.
J. Psychiat.
tions following electroshock.

101: 797—809, 19h51

Rosen, S. R., Secunda, L., and Finley, K.H.:

conservative approach to the
use of shock therapy in mental
The

illness. Psydhiatric Quart. 17: 617-6u1, 19h3.

Sutherland, G. F.:
experience with electric
consideration of
shock treatment in mental diSeases, withspecial regard to various psychosomatic
phenomena and to certain electrotechnical factors." Am. J. Psychiat. 99:

Sulzbach, W., Tillotson, K.

J.,
" A

Gullemin, V.,

and
Jr.,some

519-52h, 19h3.

Taylor, R. M., and Pacella, B. L.:
.

J. Nerv.

_&gt;

&amp; 1VLent.

significance of abnormal electroencephalograms prior to electroconvulsive therapy.

The

Dis. 107: 220, l9h8.

Lowinger, L., and Huddleson, J. H.: The correlation of pre-electro—
shock electroencephalogram and
therapeutic result in schizophrenia. .Am. J. Psychiat. 102: 299, l9h5.

Turner,

Neil,
l9h7.

W.

J.,

A. A.,

Brinegar,

W.

0.:

"Electroencephalographic studies following electric
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 57: 719,

shock therapy.

�286.lﬂ§elation
EEG
Number
Delta
of
Manuscript
re:
Activity ..." by Fink and Kahn
Dear Doctor Fink:
I am very pleased to inform you that your paper
has been accepted by the Editorial Board for publica-

NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY.

tion in the
of
issue
in
an
early
article
It is planned to use your
A.M.A. ARCHIVES OF

the

ARCHIVES.

Yours very truly,
ROY R. GRINKER, M.D.

Editor-in-Chief for Psychiatry
P.S. It is necessary for publication that you forward an additional copy of your paper directly to Mr. G.S.Cooper, Managing
Editor, A.M.A. Specialty Journals, 535 North Dearborn St.,
Thank you.
Chicago 10, Illinois, as soon as possible.

�L___E,,

_,

WW--.

,

,

,

,

R. GRIEKEE, .
DIRECTOR, P. a

BOY

MICHAEL REESE".

29th

SIREET

CHICAGO

AND

,.

pgmg's 2mg; E

16. ILLIIS|957

in %£;"3 Max Fink,

Department

M.

DEdeEimental

°f

Hillside HOSPigg;
75
263rd Stfeéi “
‘

Glen Oak§,3

c‘.

NEWTYGRKE
.

-“

i

V.

-

.

I

J

.'

--E
EVE
I

;

.

3

i...'

-_

.*-«

.

n
a"

Psychiatry

l,
‘pja.'ff~xﬁE=b
.

.4

-'

.

',

3‘,

.

2“”

ﬂ

�C

'

o

Please return to

r;’

MD

Publications Inc.,

30

East 60th

St.,

New

York, 22, by Jan.

2

1958.

Relation of Electroencephalographic BeltavActiviiy to Behavioral Response in
.
Electroshock, Quantitative Serial Studies. EAX FENK Ali RDbnﬁT L. AAHN. AMA-Archives
of. e rology &amp; Pegcniatry 78: 516-525, November, 1957
-

I

In a study of the neurophysioloch correlates of convulsive more”, serial
electroencephalogram were obtained at weekly intervals in an consecutive patients
referred for electrodzock. no records were quantitatively analysed for the
degree of delta activity by

moments of the

per cent. tine delta, latest frequency and highest amplitude delta in the record, and daemon of burst activity.

signiﬁcant relationship was found batsmen the degree and duration of
induced delta activity and clinical evaluation of behavioral change. The results were conﬁned in a predictive study in m additional 9; patients.
A

Differences between these results and those obtained by others are ex’
plained in tonne of differences in methodology.
A

presented.

It

-

adaptive interpretation or convulsive the repy is
is concluded that convulsive therapy is the nonspeciﬁc induction

neurophysiologic

of persistent states of altered cerebral function, providing the physiologic
milieu in which changes in sdaptive intezpersonel behavior occur.
Ilprosrenen’c steer electrooonvulsive therapy

.

is

seen es

:1

special. case

of behavioral response under these conditions. the rating is an evalmtion by
an observer depending on annex-one teeters, including the type of adaptation,
the goal and expectetim of the observer (therapist, family or adainistrstor),
and the

setting in

which the behavior

occurs.

�In a-study of the neurophysiologic correlates of convulsive therapy,

serial electroencephalograms were obtained at weekly intervals in

2h

conseCutive patients referred for electroshock. The records were quantita-

tively analyzed for the degree of delta activity

by measurements of the

per cent time delta, lowest frequency and highest amplitude delta in the
record, and duration or burst activity.

significant relationship was found between the degree and duration
of induced delta activity and clinical evaluation of behavioral change.
A

The

results were confirmed in

a

predictive study in

an

additional

Sh

patients.
Differences between these results and those obtained by others are
explained in terms of differences in methodology.
A

therapy

‘

neurophysiologic - adaptive interprdation of the-ele- convulsive

is presented. It is

concluded

thataai-lil-convulsive therapy is

the nonspecific induction of persistent states of altered cerebral function,
providing the physiologic milieu in which changes in adaptive interpersonal
behavior occur.
Improvement

after eledtrégggzﬁﬂiz’gfezwzz a special case of behavioral

response under these conditions.

The

rating is

factors, including the type of adaptation, the goal
expectation of the observer (therapist, family or administrator), and

depending on numerous
and

an evaluation by an observer

the setting in which the behavior occurs.

�v

w

a,
z.

K

.

.3

2.»

w\

A

Y;
.

369

.36

N =

W.

��EEG DELTA ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE
graphic Studies, J. Nerv.

&amp;

Ment. Dis.

107 :517—530.

1948.

13. Kennard, M. A., and Willner, M. D.: Signiﬁcance of Changes in Electroencephalogram
Which Result from Shock Therapy, Am. J.
Psychiat. 105:40—45, 1948.
14. Callaway, E.: Slow Wave Phenomena in
Intensive Electroshock, Electroencephalog. &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 2 :157-162, 1950.
15. Chusid, J. G., and Pacella, B. L.: The Electroencephalogram in the Electric Shock Therapies,
J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 116:95-107, 1952.
16. Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman,
I. C., and Pincus, G.: Changes in Electroencephalogram and in the Excretion of 17—Ketosteroids
Accompanying Electroshock Therapy of Agitated
Depression, Psychosom. Med. 8:246-251, 1946.
17. Strauss, H.: Clinical and Electroencephalo—
graphic Studies: Correlations of Mental, Electro—
encephalographic and Anatomic Changes in Cases
with Organic Brain Disease, Am. J. Psychiat. 101:
.

42-50, 1944.

18. Davis, H., and Davis, P. A.: The Electrical
Activity of the Brain: Its Relation to Physiological
States of Impaired Consciousness, A. Res. Nerv.
&amp; Ment. Dis, Proc. (1938) 19:50-80, 1939.
19. Ostow, M., and Strauss, H.: The Signiﬁcance
of Bilateral Abnormality in the Electroencephalogram, J. Mt. Sinai Hosp. 20:173-193, 1953.
20. Ostow, M., and Ostow, M.: Bilaterally
Synchronous Paroxysmal Slow Activity in the
Electroencephalograms of Non-Epileptics, J. Nerv.
&amp; Ment. Dis. 103 :346-358, 1946.
21. Jung, R.: Correlations of Bioelectrical and
Autonomic Phenomena with Alterations of Con—
sciousness and Arousal in Man, in Brain Mecha—
nisms and Consciousness, edited by J. F.
Delafresnaye, Springﬁeld, 111., Charles C Thomas,
Publisher, 1954, pp. 310-344.
22. Strauss, H.; Ostow, M., and Greenstein, L.:
Diagnostic Electroencephalography, New York,
Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952.

Fink—Kuhn

23. Roth, M.: A Theory of ECT Action and

Its Bearing on the Biological Signiﬁcance of

Epilepsy, J. Ment. Sc. 98 244—59, 1952.
24. Bornstein, M. B.: Presence and Action of
Acetylcholine in Experimental Brain Trauma, J.
Neurophysiol. 9:349—366, 1946.
25. Tower,‘ D., and McEachern, D.: The Content and Characterization of Cholinesterases in
Human Cerebrospinal Fluids, Canad. J. Research,
Sect. E. 27:132-145, 1949.
26. Spiegel—Adolf, M.; Wilcox, P. H., and
Spiegel, E. A.: Cerebrospinal Fluid Changes in
Electroshock Treatment in Psychosis, Am. J.

Psychiat.

104:697—706,

1948.

and Spiegel-Adolf, M.:
Physiological and Physiochemical Mechanisms in
Electroshock Treatment, Conﬁnia neurol. 13:38—63,
27.

Spiegel,

E.

A.,

1953.

28. Landolt, H.: Das EEG bei epileptischen
Psychosen und schizophrenen Schiiben, Personal
communication to the authors.
29. Landolt, H.: Uber Verstimmungen, Dam—
merzustande und schizophrene Zustandsbilder bei
Epilepsie, Schvveiz. Arch. Neurol. u. Psychiat.
76 1313—321, 1955.

30. Brockman, R. J.; Brockman, J. C.: Jacobsohn, U.; Gleser, G. C., and Ulett, G. A.: Changes
in Convulsive Threshold as Related to Type of

Treatment, Conﬁnia neurol. 16:97—104, 1956.
31. Fabing, H.: Personal communication to the
authors, 1956.
32. Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L.; Sugarman,
L. A., and Linn, L.: The Diagnostic Use of Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Brain
Disease, Am. J. Psychiat. 109:889—894, 1953.
33. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, Conﬁnia neurol, to be published.
34. Ulett, G. A.; Smith, K., and Gleser, G. C.:
Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive Shock
Therapies Utilizing a Control Group, Am. J.
Psychiat. 112:795-802, 1956.

Printed and Published in the United States of America

525

as

�/

4

I

Tax

A

“ﬁn?

.A

g.

_
MW.»

.15.

__

O
\Q

«
A

A"

33

9%

~

,.

\a

E

,

+3?

“a

.

§

mm“

‘

g...

.496

=

a

«a.
.«F

N
.

.

my
3s

\AVUFQV.

.

a

SEN

z

«Kay

pm“

Aw

‘

.

ﬁ

0.

3

qu$v

g

c.

.

E
«7}

Vi

__

ramﬂjﬂaj~

a

=

Arsﬁv

xaxwrwmﬂu

f»

r

«UN:

:15.

_

.n

A
an

é

it MW: a. N»

“.3 M‘\

«R

.

R.“

A
Mi

31.. A}

_

“$me

_

3J3

..

mamme

.

.rrn:

=

h
J

H

mﬁuMMc

«s

V

4.

NAQV

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2484">
                <text>Relation of electroencephalographic delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock; quantitative serial studies. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1957 Nov; 78(5):516-25.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2485">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2486">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-21b-026</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2487">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2488">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2489">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2490">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2491">
                <text>7 items. 1: Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry November 1957, Vol.78, pp. 516—525. 2: Two final draft copies. 3: Several pages of handwritten notes. 4: Reference list (mix of typed and handwritten). 5: Postcard from Roy R. Grinker to Fink. 6: Copy of same page. 7: Scans of missing pages fromthe items listed above.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2492">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2493">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74451">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81012">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87573">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94134">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="271" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="62">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/261abbc7e46388bc86f6597be731bd1c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0134e8d9c4e023061da7cfc3c500f0f0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100688">
                    <text>t

Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral
Change Following Induced Convulsions

Max

Fink,

McDo

Robert L. Kahn Ph.D.
and
Hyman

From

Korin Ph.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,N.Y.

Institute of Mental Health, National
Health Service.
United
Public
States
of
Health,
Institutes

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National

(in part) at the Divisional Meeting A.P.A., Montreal, November, 1956, and
International Congress of Neurological Sciences, Brussels, July, 1957.
the
at

Read

12-3-57

“W5, $9;

WW7

A“!

�Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral
Change Following Induced Convulsions
Numerous

studies have been.reported assessing the type, duration

and significance of mental changes following electroshock. These reports

vary widely in their descriptions and
meaningful conclusion regarding the

it is difficult to arrive at a

relation of such mental changes to

clinical response. Basic to these differences in observation are the
vexing problems of the definition and the ways of measurement of organictype reactions;

the time relation of the measurements to the treatment

process; and the definition of improvement following therapy. Each of
these factors bears an integral relationship to the final definition of
the problem.

In the present study, various

tests of brain function were

applied serially to patients in mhom‘behavicr was altered by repeated
inductions of grand mal convulsions (Electroshock).

The

data comparing

the serial changes in these indices are presented.
METHOD:

Definition of "organic mental changes":

conventional conception

The

of organic mental changes includes such behavioral changes as impairment

of

memory and of

the discrimination of differences on perceptual tasks;

disorientation for time, date, or place; errors

tractibility

and

inability to handle

perserveration in speech

on

more than one

and behavior; emotional

calculation tests; dis-

situation at a time;

lability;

and

loss of

interest in one's appearance and in the environment. Most studies assess
the relationship of memory loss or clinically manifest disorientation to
improvement following

by

tests of

simple

electroshock.

The memory

loss is usually measured

recall, information, personal events, digit

memory span,

�~2r

etc.: while disorientation is
place, date,

determined by questions

the examiner, 323,

name of

Such

tests of

relating to present
memory and

of

orientation, however, discriminate primarily only severe degrees of dysF

function.
In the present studies, cognizant of the difficulties inherent in

clinical assessments, we measured changes in brain function by four
different measures, hoping thereby to determine varying degrees, or even,
simple

types of dysfunction.

The

four'measures selected as being sensitive to

varying aspects and degrees of cerebral dysfunction.were:
a) The degree of delta activity in the electroencephalogram (1).

b)

in language and orientation following the administration
of amobarbital sodium - the "amytal test" for organic brain

Changes

disease (2, 3).
c) Alteration in perception of multiple simultaneous
d)

Changes

in tests of recall of

the interpolation of reading
Time

of Testing:

A

common

lists

tactile stimuli (h).

words, both with and without

of nonsense syllables (5).

second factor to be considered

is the

time of

application of these tests in relation to the treatment program.
Observers have reported the development of organic changes in the

Numerous

few

minutes of recovery following each treatment. Others noted the appearance

of mental changes during the course of treatment, and reported that treatments

at periods more frequent than the conventional three times per week induced
earlier and more severe changes. The transient nature of the changes are
frequently noted, so that by the second or third

at pretreatment levels,
orientation is re-instituted.

course of therapy the electroencephalogram is
memory changes have

disappeared and

week following an extensive

�-BIn the present studies, the electroshock treatment schedule was main-

tained at three times per week with
Reiter electroshock, during the

all

patients receiving conventional

initial three weeks.

In the fourth week,

treatment frequency was occasionally reduced to two times per week. All

patients received a
out

at

weekly

minimmn

intervals

of twelve treatments. All

on a day following a

tests were carried

treatment during the course

of therapy. Following termination: of therapy, weekly testing was continued

until the tests returned to their initial level.
third factor crucial to a study relating the
significance of organic mental changes to electroshock results is the
definition and evaluation of "improvement." The evaluation of clinical
Behavior Ratings:

response to therapy

A

is

a subjective value judgment by the therapist or

adninistrator which reflects a divergence of goals, judgments, and compromises. Significant variables in the evaluation of "improvement" are
the type, severity and duration of the pets“. ent' s illness, his premcrbid
personality, the sociologic (family) constellation to which he will return,
and the expectations (both conscious and unconscious) of the

institution, of the patient and of the family.
of the evaluation of the treannent result is also a

the

therapist, of

Furthermore , the time
most

sigaificant

variable.
The

parameters of evaluation have not been satisfactorily delineated.

In this study, the following

compromises have been made.

All evaluations

qualified psychiatrist who has no responsibility
for the selection of subjects or application of the treatments. Patients
are

made by an independent

are seen weekly

and conferences are

held with the therapist to assess the

�.Ll.

therapeutic goals before treatment and the therapist‘s estimate of the
respOnse

after treatment.

The

finai evaluation used here is the

clinical state of the patient during the second and third weeks following
the last treatment, and describe only changes in clinical behavior.
we have used a

three-fold classification of

improved" and "uninmuoved," with the
and "unimproved"

"much improved," "moderately

intent that the

categories respectively

"much improved"

would describe

patients at

the extremes of the response continuum.
The

patients rated as

those

"much improved" were

showed the symptoms which brought them.to the

who no

longer

hospital, their physicians

believed them to be better, and the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects
as being able to sleep without medication, better appetite and improved

capacity to participate in hospital activities.
The "unimproved"

patients were those

noticeable change in behavior

who

manifested no clearly

or'Who became worse.

The "moderately improved" patients showed some change

but continued to manifest signs of'mental illness.
some symptomatic

relief,

which was

transient.

They

in behavior,
typically showed

�.5.
RESULTS :

Twenty-four consecutive electroshock patients were studied.

these, eleven
and

were

Of

"much improved," seven as "unimproved,"

rated as

six as "nmderately improved."
(a) Electroencephalogrems: EEG records, using conventional leads,

were measured for the average per cent time

delta activity,

and

highest

per cent time delta in any one lead; the Slowest frequency in the record;
and the duration and amplitude of delta burst activity (1). Using these
measurements, the 180 records in the series were placed in rank order
according to the degree of delta activity.

The upper

1/3 of the records

were described as "high delta activity" and the lowest 1/3 as "low

delta

activity."
pretreatment records showed delta activity. During the course of
electroshock delta activity appeared in all records to varying degrees. It
No

was apparent within the
on the

third

with high

first

week following

EEG

week of treatment and

the

7~9

treatments.

The

usually reached a peak

results for those

delta activity are seen in Table I.
TABLE
EEG

-

%

I

High Delta

Activity
1-3

h—é

7-9

10-12

25

80

91

88

Moderately Improved (6)

0

16

50

ho

unimproved (7)

o

o

o

20

Treatment Period:
much Improved (11)

�~6(b) AmObarbital Test: In these

tests (2,

3) the patients are asked

series of questions relating to their illness and to orientation.
Sodium amytal is administered intravenously until nystagmus and slurred
speech are observed. The questions are then repeated. Changes in
a

orientation

and awareness

of illness are scored as "positive" amytal

response, reflecting a change in brain function ascribed to “organic

brain disease" (2).

The

results are noted in the next table.
TABLE

II

Amvtal Test -.%

Positive

Treatment Period: 1-3

11-6

7-9

10-12

13-15

Much Improved (11)

us

61;

100

89

100

Moderately Improved (6)

20

33

67

20

25

Unimproved (7)

1h

16

16

33

o

The

data of Tables

The congruence

I

and

II

have been graphically portrayed in Figure

of the observations of the degree of

delta activity

EEG

l.

and

test responses is demonstrated. (Fig. 1)
Tests: In this test (5) a list of three letter common

the per cent positive amytal
(c)

Memos!

words were presented

for

10

to patients by flash cards.

trials. After this, lists

interpolated.

The

of 3

recall of the first

The

cards were presented

letter nonsense syllables

list

were

of'wordStmas.then tested, and

the number of words recalled in each session was scored.
An

impairment

in recall function

decrement was maximal

in the second

was apparent
and

third

in all subjects. This

weeks of

sustained as long as treatments were administered

treatment,

3 times a week.

and was

�-7The

decrease in ability to recall the word

list is

noted

in the next

table o
TABLE

III

anaiment in Recall -

Marked Decrement

%

Treatment Period

1-3

1456

7-9

10-12

Improved (9)

o

11

33

o

Moderately Improved (h)

0

SO

SO

0

Unimproved (7)

0

1h

0

0

Much

the scores are compared with the mprovement rating, there is
no significant difference between groups. The rapid return of recall
ability to pretreatment levels when treatment frequency was reduced to
When

two times per week

indicates that this

more severe degrees

test is

a measure of only the

of cerebral dysfmction.

tests the patient is touched
by the examiner simultaneously on the cheek and the hand, and asked to
localize the stimuli. The tests are repeated for 10 trials using varying
combinations of cheek, hand, shoulder and thigh. Persistent failure to
(d) Tactile Perceptual Tests: In these

report

the stimuli or to mislocalize a stimulus beyond the tenth
indicative, in adults, of altered cerebral function (h).

one of

trial is
In all subjects, this test

was negative before

patients. In nine patients, two
observed, and of these, six were in the much

responses were observed in 19 of the
consecutive responses were
improved and three

treatment. Positive

21;

in the moderately improved groups.

�In the next table the positive responses were charted with relation

to the treatment period

and

of positive regaonses is to

the clinical evaluation.
be noted

in the first

A

high incidence

two groups, and many

fewer such responses in the unimproved group.
TABLE

Face Hand Test

IV

- % Positive
1-3

h-6

7-9

10-12

13-15

Much Improved (11)

16

no

in

h3

60

Moderately Improved (6)

60

1:3

2:3

30

o

o

16

12

11

o

Treatment Period

Unimproved (7)

�DISCUSSION:

Three aspects of these observations warrant elaboration.

sensitivity
and the

and

stability

The

of these indices of altered brain function

significance for a definition of altered cerebral function;

the relation of these indices during and

evaluation;

and

after treatment to the clinical

the relation of these observations for the theory of

electroshock action.
All

tests

showed changes during electroshock therapy,

indicating

that a state of altered cerebral function'was induced. Certain tests,
as the

EEG

and the amytal

test,

were altered

after a

few convulsions

persistently positive for one to three weeks fOIIOWing
treatment. In this regard the electroencephalogram manifested the
earliest and the most sustained changes. The recall and tactile perceptual tests also showed changes but these appeared late (in the 2nd
and remained

week of treatment) and disappeared

rapidly

when treatment frequency

was reduced.

Tests of recall function and

tactile perceptual tests, therefore,

are less sensitive indicators of the state of cerebral function. In
any evaluation

of the relation of an induced

to another‘variable,

it is important,

the operation (or

test)

and the

Because these

tests

have varying

change

in brain function

therefore, to clearly define both

sensitivity of the operation which forms
the basis for the estimation of altered cerebral function.

sensitivities, the frequency of

treatment and the duration of the treatment regimen become important

variables in any assessment.

EEG

changes are maintained by infrequent

�~10-

treatment, while changes in recall function and simultaneous tactile
perception are rapidly
0f the

function,

clinical

lost,

when treatment frequency

reduced.

correlations possible with these tests of brain

many

we have

selected the relation of these test results to the

improvement

rating.

‘With

the

EEG-and amytal

relationships between the appearance of test changes
improvement are

is

clearly observed. In the

positive amytal tests

and high degree

were more marked, and were sustained

EEG

tests significant
and

much improved

clinical
patients,

abnormality appeared early,

for longer periods (on the

treatment regimen) than in the unimproved patients.

The

same

moderately

improved patients were in between.

relation between altered brain function and clinical response

This

is noted only with the data obtained during the course of therapy.
There is no correlation of improvement ratings with post-ptreatment test
results. This divergence is related to the timing of test applications,
in the conclusions of other studies

and may explain the discrepancies

of this prdblem.
These Observations can also be
mode of

action of electrochock.

related to an understanding of the

In 1952,'Weinstein, Linn and

Kahn

(6)

postulated that the function of electroshock therapy was to "initiate
the production of a state of altered brain function in which the patient

his problems." These observations support the first part of
this hypothesis. namely, that a state of altered cerebral function is
can deny

induced by electroshock. Also, in patients who.improved, the altered

state is

more prominent, appears

earlier and is

more

persistent than in

�,

those

who

fail to

improve.

Of

the eleven

positive amytal tests (while
positive test); and ten had high

had

one of the unimproved

.11.much improved

patients, all

5 of the 7 unimproved never had a
EEG

abnormality records, while only

patients had such a record.

It is

our condlusion

significant degrees of altered cerebral
function are a prerequisite - a necessary, though not a sufficient
requirement - for improvement in electroshock therapy.

that early? sustained

and

�4.2;»

W:

In a study of the relation of tests of altered brain function

to improvement in electroshock,
of change

it

was observed

that while indicators

in brain function vary in sensitivity, all tests indicate

the development of organic mental changes during electroshock therapy.
The

reason for the conflicting results reported by others can be

accounted

for by the variations in the tests used, the time of study

difficulties in evaluating improvement.
It is our conclusion that clinical improvement in electroshock is

and the

dependent on
and

early, sustained

that electroshock therapy

and marked changes
may be

in mental function;

described as the non-Specific,

traumatic induction of states of altered cerebral function in which
the subject reacts with

new

patterns of adaptation.

�REFERENCES

1- Fink,

M. and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative
Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neural. &amp; chhiatﬂﬁ:

516.525, 1957.

_

Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, 3.: Serial Administration
Test"
for Brain Disease. Its Diagnostic and
of "Anvtal
Prognostic Value, A.M.A. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat.
217-226, 1951;.

2. Weinstein, E.A,,

_’_?_I_:

3.

Kahn, R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, A.M,A.

Arch. jieurol.

8c

Psychiat" Zé: 23-29, 1956.

and Bender, M.B.: The Face-Hand Test as a
Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome, NeurologX, _2_:

h. Fink, M., Green, ILA.
h6—58. 1952.

H. , Fink, M. and Kwalwasser, 8.:
Memory and Learning to Improvement
Neuron-o, $6.: 88'96’ 1956.

5. Karin,

Relation of Changes in
in Electroshock, Conf.

Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy,
Am.

J. Psychiat., 109: 22-26,

1952’.

�--- .. anEu’mlJ-Jﬁal
from
,
“T'he FLSL
, ,.. -n
Congress of Neur-ofogical
’, Brussels, 1.;7. Vol. III.
EEG, Clinical Neurophysiology
ces
-pllepsy. Pergamon Press; London, New York &amp; Paris 1959

"Emmi

,

RELATION OF TESTS OF ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION TO
BEHAVIORAL CHANGE FOLLOWING INDUCED CONVULSIONS
DANS
CEREBRALE
FONCTIONNELLE
ALTERATION
D'UNE
ROLE
LE CHANGEMENT DE COMPORTEMENT SUCCEDANT A DES
CONVULSIONS PROVOQUEES
MAX FINK, ROBERT L.KAHN and HYMAN KORIN

New York, U.S.A.

Numerous studies have been reported assessing the type, duration and
significance of mental changes following electroshock. These reports vary
widely in their descriptions and it is difficult to arrive at a meaningful
conclusion regarding the relation of such mental changes to clinical
the
in
vexing
observation
differences
to
are
these
Basic
response.
problems of the definition and the ways of measurement of organic—type
reactions; the time relation of the measurements to the treatment process;
and the definition of improvement following therapy. Each of these factors
bears an integral relationship to the final definitiOn of the problem. In the
to
function
of
applied
serially
brain
were
various
tests
present study,
of
inductions
grand
altered
whom
behaviour
by
in
repeated
was
patients
mal convulsions (Electro shock). The data comparing the serial changes in
these indices are presented.
MET HOD

Definition of 'organic mental changes'
The conventional conception of organic mental changes includes such
of
of
discrimination
the
and
of
behavioural changes as impairment memory
differences on perceptual tasks; disorientation for time, date, or place;
handle
to
and
more
inability
caICulation
0n
distractibility
tests;
errors
than one situation at a time; per serveration in speech and behaviour;
emotional lability; and loss of interest in one‘s appearance and in the
environment. Most studies assess the relationship of memory loss or
clinically manifest disorientation to improvement following electroshock.
The memory loss is usually measured by tests of simple recall, informa: while disorientation is
etc.
tion, personal events, digit memory span,
determined by questions relating to present place, date, name of the
examiner, etc. Such tests of memory and of orientation, however,
discriminate primarily only severe degrees of dysfunction.
In the present studies, cognizant of the difficulties inherent in simple
clinical assessments, we measured changes in brain function by four
different measures, hoping thereby to determine varying degrees, or even,
to
sensitive
selected
four
being
The
as
of
measures
types dysfunction.
varying aspects and degrees of cerebral dysfunction were:
(a) The degree of delta activity in the electroencephalogram (l).
(b) Changes in language and orientation following the administration
of amobarbital sodium - the 'amytal test' for organic brain
disease (2, 3).
613

‘

�614

M. FINK, R.L.KAHN and H.KORIN

(c) Alteration in perception of multiple simultaneous tactile stimuli
((1)

(4).

Changes in tests of recall of common words, both with and without the interpolation of reading lists of nonsense syllables (5).

Time of Testing
A second factor to be considered is the time of application of these
tests in relation to the treatment program. Numerous observers have
reported the development of organic changes in the few minutes of recovery
following each treatment. Others noted the appearance of mental changes
during the course of treatment, and reported that treatments at periods
more frequent than the conventional three times per week induced earlier
and more severe changes. The transient nature of the changes are
frequently noted, so that by the second or third week following an extensive
course of therapy the electroencephalogram is at pretreatment levels,
memory changes have disappeared and orientation is re-instituted.
In the present studies, the electroshock treatment schedule was
maintained at three times per week with all patients receiving conventional
Reiter electroshock, during the initial three weeks. In the fourth week,
treatment frequency was occasionally reduced to two times per week. All
patients received a minimum of tWelve treatments. All tests were carried
out at weekly intervals on a day following a treatment during the course of
therapy. Following termination of therapy, weekly testing was c0ntinued
until the tests returned to their initial level.
Behavior Ratings
A third factor crucial to a study relating the significance of organic
mental changes to electroshock results is the definitiOn and evaluation
of 'improvement‘. The evaluation of clinical response to therapy is a
subjective value judgment by the therapist or administrator which reﬂects
a divergence of goals, judgments , and compromises. Significant variables
in the evaluation of 'improvement' are the type, severity and duration of
the patient's illness, his premorbid personality, the sociologic (family)
constellation to which he will return, and the expectatious (both conscious
and unconscious) of the therapist, of the institution, of the patient and of
the family. Furthermore, the time of the evaluation of the treatment
result is also a most significant variable.
The parameters of evaluation have not been satisfactOrily delineated.
In this study, the following compromises have been made. All evaluations
are made by an independent qualified psychiatrist who has no responsibility
for the selection of ‘subjects or application of the treatments. Patients are
seen weekly and conferences are held with the therapist to assess the
therapeutic goals before treatment and the therapist's estimate of the
response after treatment. The final evaluation used here is the clinical
state of the patient during the second and third weeks following the last
treatment, and describe only changes in clinical behaviour. We have used
a three-fold classification of 'much improved' , 'moderately improved' and
'unimproved' , with the intent that the 'much improved' and 'unimproved'
categories respectively would describe patients at the extremes of the
response continuum.
The patients rated as 'much improved' were those who no longer
showed the symptoms which brought them to the hospital, their physicians
'

�Relation of tests of altered brain ﬁmction to behavioral change

615

believed them to be better, and the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects
as being able to sleep without medication, better appetite and improved
capacity to participate in hospital activities.
The 'unimproved' patients were those who manifested no clearly
noticeable change in behaviour or who became worse.
The 'moderately improved' patients showed some change in behaviour,
but continued to manifest signs of mental illness. They typically showed
some symptomatic relief, which was transient.
RESULTS

Twenty-four consecutive electroshock patients were studied. Of these,
eleven were rated as 'much improved', seven as 'unimproved', and six
as 'moderately improved'.
(a) Electro enc ephalogr am s
EEG

records, using conventional leads, were measured for the

average per cent time delta activity, and highest per cent time delta in any
one lead; the slowest frequency in the record; and the duration and
amplitude of delta bur st activity (1). Using these measurements, the 180
records in the series were placed in rank order according to the degree
of delta activity. The upper 1/3 of the records were described as 'high
delta activity' and the lowest 1/3 as 'low delta activity'.
No pretreatment records showed delta activity. During the course of
electroshock delta activity appeared in all records to varying degrees. It
was apparent within the first week of treatment and usually reached a peak
on the third week following the 7-9 treatments. The results for those with
high EEG delta activity are seen in Table I.
TABLE I
EEG -

%

High Delta Activity

Treatment Period:
Much Improved (11)

Moderately Improved (6)
Unimproved (7)
(b)
'W

.....'-.——-—-

a
.-

1-3

4-6

7-9

25

80

91
50

10-12

—-——————__.____—_~__
0
0

16

0

0

88
40
20

Amobarbital Te st

In these tests (2, 3) the patients are asked a series of questiOns
relating to their illness and to orientation. Sodium amytal is administered
intravenously until nystagmus and slurred speech are observed. The
questions are then repeated. Changes in orientation and awareness of
illness are scored as 'positive' amytal response, reflecting a change in
brain function ascribed to 'organic brain disease' (2.). The reSults are
noted in the next table.

�616

M. FINK, R.L.KAHN and H.KORIN

TAB—Ly;

Arnytal Test -

%

Positive

Treatment Period
Much Improved

(ll)

1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12
45
20

Moderately Improved (6)
Unimproved (7)

64 100
33 67

14

16

16

89
20
33

13-15
100
25
0

(c) Memory Tests:

In this test (5) a list of three letter common words were presented to
patients by ﬂash cards. The cards were presented for 10 trials. After
this, lists of 3 letter nonsense syllables were interpolated. The recall of
the first list of words was then tested, and the number of words recalled
in each session was scored.
An impairment in recall function was apparent in all subjects. This
decrement was maximal in the second and third weeks of treatment, and
was sustained as long as treatments were administered 3 times a week.
The decrease in ability to recall the word list is noted in the next table.

TABLE III

Impairment in Recall -

%

Marked Decrement

Treatment Period
Much Improved (9)

Moderately Improved (4)
Unimproved (7)

1-3

4-6

7-9

10—12

0
0
0

ll

33
50

0

50

l4

0

O

0

are compared with the improvement rating, there
is no significant difference between groups. The rapid return of recall
ability to pretreatment levels when treatment frequency was reduced to two
times per week indicates that this test is a measure of only the more
severe degrees of cerebral dysfunction.
(d) Tactile Perceptual Tests
In these tests the patient is touched by the examiner simultaneously
on the cheek and the hand, and asked to localise the stimuli. The tests are
repeated for 10 trials using varying combinations of cheek, hand, shoulder
and thigh. Persistent failure to report one of the stimuli or to mislocalise
a stimulus beyond the tenth trial is indicative, in adults, of altered
cerebral function (4).
In all subjects, this test was negative before treatment. Positive
When the scores

�Relation of tests of altered brain ﬁmction to behavioral change

61 7

responses were observed in 19 of the 24 patients. In nine patients, two
consecutive responses were observed, and of these, six were in the much
improved and three in the moderately improved groups.
In the next table the positive responses were charted with relation
to the treatment period and the clinical evaluation. A high incidence of
positive responses is to be noted in the first two groups, and many fewer
such responses in the unimproved group.

w

Face Hand Test - % Positive
Treatment Period 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15
Much Improved (11)

16

Moderately Improved (6)
Unimproved (7)

60
O

4o
43
16

47
43
12

43

3O

ll

60
0

0

DISCUSSION

Three aspects of these observations warrant elaboration. The
sensitivity and stability of these indices of altered brain function and the
significance for a definition of altered cerebral function; the relation Of
these indices during and after treatment to the clinical evaluation; and the
relation of these observations for the theory of electroshock action.
All tests showed changes during electroshock therapy, indicating
that a state of altered cerebral function was induced. Certain tests, as
the EEG and the amytal test, were altered after a few convulsions and
remained persistently positive for one to three weeks following treatment.
In this regard the electroencephalogram manifested the earliest and the
most sustained changes. The recall and tactile perceptual tests also
showed changesbut these appeared late (in the 2nd week of treatment) and
disappeared rapidly when treatment frequency was reduced.
Tests of recall function and tactile perceptual tests, therefore, are
less sensitive indicators of the state of cerebral function. In any evaluation
of the relation of an induced change in brain function to another variable, it
is important, therefore, to clearly define both the operation (or test) and
the sensitivity of the operatiOn which forms the basis for the estimation of
altered cerebral function.
Because these tests have varying sensitivities, the frequency of
treatment and the duration of the treatment regimen become important
variables in any assessment. EEG changes are maintained by infrequent
treatment, while changes in recall function and simultaneous tactile
perception are rapidly lost, when treatment frequency is reduced.
Of the many correlations possible with these tests of brain function,
we have selected the relation of these test results to the clinical improvement rating. With the EEG and amytal tests significant relationships
between the appearance of test changes and clinical improvement are
clearly observed. In the much improved patients, positive amytal tests

�618

M. FINK, R.L.KAHN and H.KORIN

and high degree EEG abnormality appeared early, were more marked, and
were sustained for longer periods (on the same treatment‘regimen) than in
the unimproved patients. The moderately improved patients were in

between.
This relation between altered brain function and clinical response is
noted only with the data obtained during the course of therapy. There is
no correlation of improvement ratings with post-treatment test results.
This divergence is related to the timing of test applications, and may
explain the discrepancies in the conclusions of other studies of this
problem.
These observations can also be related to an understanding of the
mode of action of electroshock. In 1952, Weinstein, Linn and Kahn (6)
postulated that the function of electroshock therapy was to 'initiate the
production of a state of altered brain function in which the patient can deny
his problems'. These observations Support the first part of this hypothesis,
namely, that a state of altered cerebral function is induced by electroshock. Also, in patients who improved, the altered state is more prominent, appears earlier and is more persistent than in those who fail to
improve. Of the eleven much improved patients, all had positive amytal
tests (while 5 of the 7 unimproved never had a positive test); and ten had
high EEG abnormality records, while only one of the unimproved patients
had such a record. It is our conclusion that early, sustained and significant degrees of altered cerebral function are a prerequisite - a necessary,
though not a sufficient requirement - for improvement in electroshock
therapy.
'

SUMMARY

In a study of the relation of tests of altered brain function to improvement in electroshock, it was observed that while indicators of change in
brain function vary in sensitivity, all tests indicate the development of

organic mental changes during electroshock therapy.
The reason for the conflicting results reported by others can be
accounted for by the variations in the tests used, the time of study and
the difficulties in evaluating improvement.
It is our conclusion that clinical improvement in electroshock is
dependent on early, sustained and marked changes in mental function;
and that electroshock therapy may be described as the non— specific,
traumatic induction of states of altered cerebral function in which the
subject reacts with new patterns of adaptation.
REFERENCES

l.
2.
3.

Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L. Relation of EEG delta activity to
behavioral response in electroschock: quantitative serial studies.
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. , 1957, 78: 516-525.
Weinstein, E.A. , Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, S. Serial administration
of 'Amytal Test' for brain disease. Its diagnostic and prognostic
value. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat. , 195.4, 71: 217-226.
Kahn, R.L. , Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A. Relation of amobarbital
test to clinical improvement in electroshock. A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. and Psychiat. , 1956, 76: 23-29.

�Relation of tests of altered brain function to behavioral change

619

Fink, M. , Green, M.A. and Bender, M.B. The face-hand test as
a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome. Neurology, 1952,
2: 46-58.
Korin, H. , Fink, M. and Kwalwasser, S. Relation of changes in
memory and learning to improvement in electroshock. Conf.
Neurol. , 1956, 16: 88-96.
Weinstein, E.A. , Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L. Psychosis during electro‘
shock therapy: its relation to the theory of shock therapy. Am. J.
Psychiat. , 1952, 109: 22-26.

Dept. of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hosp-ital,
Glen Oaks, N. Y. , U.S.A.
‘

��Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral
Change Following Induced Convulsions

Max

Fink,

Rebert L.

IIOD c

Kahn Ph.D.

and
Hyman

From

Karin Fh.D.

the Department of Experimental Peychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,N.Y.

Aided by Grant M~927 of the National

Institute of Mental Health, National

Institutes of Health, United States Pablic Health Service.

(in ,art) at the Divisional Meeting A. P .A., Montreal, November, 1956, and
at the International Congress oi Neurological Sciences, Brussels, July, 1957.
Read

12—3-57

�Relation of Tests of Altered Brain Function to Behavioral
Change Following Induced Convulsions
Numerous
and

studies have been reported assessing the type, duration

significance of mental changes following electroshock.

vary widely in their descriptions and
meaningful conclusion regarding the

it is difficult

These

reports

to arrive at a

relation cf such mental changes to

clinical response. Basic to these differences in observation are the
vexing problems of the definition and the ways of measurement of organic;
type reactions;

the time relation of the measurements to the treatment

process; and the definition of improvement following therapy. Each of
these factors bears an integral relationship to the final definition of
the problem.

In the present study, various

applied serially to patients in

whom

tests of brain function were

behavior was altered by repeated

inductions of grand mal convulsions (Electroshock).

The

data comparing

the serial changes in these indices are presented.
.

METHOD:

Definition of “organic mental changes":

conventional conception

The

of organic mental changes includes sudh behavioral changes as impairment

of

memory and of

the discrimination of differences on perceptual tasks;

disorientation for time, date, or place; errors

tractibility

and

inability to handle

perserveration in speech

on

more than one

and behavior; emotional

calculation tests; dis-

situation at a time;

lability;

interest in one's appearance and in his environment.
the relationship of

memory

tests of

simple

loss of

studies assess

loss or clinically manifest disorientation to

improvement following electroshock. The memory loss
by

Most

and

is usually measured

recall, information, personal events, digit

memory span,

�«2-

etc.: while disorientation is
place, date,

name of

determined by questions

the examiner, etc,

Such

tests of

relating.to present
memory and

of

orientation, however, discriminate primarily only severe degrees of dysfunction.
In the present studies, cognizant of the difficulties inherent in
simple clinical assessments, we measured changes in brain function by four

different measures, hoping thereby to determine varying degrees, or even,
types of dysfunction.

The

four measures selected as being sensitive to

varyinD aspects and degrees of cerebral dysfunction were:

delta activity in the electroencephalogram (1).
b) Changes in language and orientation following the administration
of amobarbital sodium - the "amytal test" for organic brain
a)

The degree of

disease (2, 3).
c)

Alteration in perception of multiple simultaneous tactile stimuli (h).

d)

Changes

in tests of recall of

the interpolation of reading
Time of

Testing:

A

common

lists

words, both with and without

of nonsense syllables (5).

second factor to be considered

is the

time of

application of these tests in relation to the treatment program.
observers have reported the development of organic changes in the

Numerous

few

minutes of recovery following each treatment. Others noted the appearance
of mental changes during the course of treatment, and reported

that treatments

at periods more frequent than the conventional three times per week induced
earlier and more severe changes. The transient nature of the changes are
frequently noted, so that

by

the second or third

is at pretreatment levels,
orientation is re-instituted.

course of therapy the electroencephalogram
memory changes have

disappeared and

week following an extensive

�.3In the present studies, the electroshock treatment schedule was main-

tained at three times per

all patients receiving conventional
initial three weeks. In the fourth week,

week with

Reiter electroshock, during the

treatment frequency was occasionally reduced to two times per week. All

patients received a
out

at

weekly

minimum

intervals

of twelve treatments. All

on a day following a

tests

were carried

treatment during the course

of therapy. Following termination of therapy, weekly testing was continued

until the tests returned to their initial level.
Behavior Ratings:

A

third factor crucial to a study relating the

significance of organic mental changes to electroshock results is the
definition and evaluation of "improvement." The evaluation of clinical

is a subjective value
administrator which reflects a divergence
response to therapy

judgment by the

therapist or

of goals, judgments, and com-

promises. Significant variables in the evaluation of "improvement” are
the type, severity and duration of the

patient's illness, his

premorbid

personality, the sociologic (family) constellation to which he will return,
and the

expectations (both conscious and unconscious) of the therapist, of

the institution, of the patient and of the family. Furthermore, the time
of the evaluation of the treatment

result is also a

most

significant

variable.
The

parameters of evaluation have not been satisfactoriLy delineated.

In this study, the following compromises have been made. All evaluations
are

made by an

independent qualified psychiatrist

who has no

responsibility

for the selection of subjects or application of the treatments. Patients
are seen weekly and conferences are held with the therapist to assess the

�.44..

therapeutic goals before treatment

and

the therapist‘s estimate of the

final evaluation used here is the
clinical state of the patient during the second and third weeks following
the last treatment, and describe only changes in clinical behavior.

reaponse

after treatment.

we have used a

The

three-fold classification of

improved" and "unimproved," with the

"much improved," "moderately

intent that the

"much improved"

and "unimproved" categories respectively would describe patients

at

the extremes of the response continuum.
The

patients rated as

"much improved" were

showed the symptoms which brought them

those

who no

longer

to the hospital, their physicians

believed them to be better, and the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects
as being able to sleep without medication,

better appetite

and improved

capacity to participate in hospital activities.
The "unimproved"

patients were those

noticeable change in behavior or
The

who became

"moderately improved" patients

manifested no clearly

Who

worse.

showed some change

but continued to manifest signs of'mental illness.
some symptomatic

relief,

which was

transient.

They

in behavior,

typically

showed

�-5RESULTS :

Twenty-four consecutive electroshock patients were studied.

"much improved," seven as "unimproved,"

these, eleven were rated as
and

Of

six as "moderately improved."
(a) Electroencephalograns:

EEG

records, using conventional leads,

highest
lead; the Slowest frequency in the record;

were measured for the average per cent time

delta activity,

and

per cent time delta in any one
and the duration and amplitude of delta burst activity (1). Using these
measurements, the 180 records in the series were placed in rank order
according to the degree of delta activity.
were described as "high delta

activity"

and

The upper

1/3 of the records

the lowest 1/3 as "low delta

activity.”
No

electroshock delta activity appeared in
was apparent within the
on the

activity.

pretreatment records showed delta

third

with high

first

week following

EEG

all

records to varying degrees.

week of treatment and

the 7-9 treatments.

delta activity are seen in Table
TABLE
EEG

.

%

During the course of

The

usually reached a peak

results for those

I.

I

Hiqh Delta

Activity

Treatment Period:

10-12

1-3

h—é

7—9

25

80

91

88

Moderately Improved (6)

o

16

so

ho

Unimproved (7)

o

o

o

20

ﬁnch Improved

(ll)

It

�a

(b)

~6-

Amobarbital Test; In these

tests (2,

3) the patients are asked

series of questions relating to their illness and to orientation.
Sodium amytal is administered intravenously until nystagmus and slurred
speech are observed. The questions are then repeated. Changes in

a

orientation

and awareness of

illness are scored as "positive" amytal

reSponse, reflecting a change in brain function ascribed to "organic
brain disease" (2). The results are noted in the next table.
TABLE

Amytal Test

-

II
%

Positive

Treatment Period:

1-3

h-6

7-9

10-12

13-15

Much Improved (11)

£15

61;

100

89

100

Moderately Improved (6)

20

33

67

20

25

Unimproved (7)

1h

16

16

33

o

The

data of Tables

The congruence of

I

and

II

have been graphically portrayed in Figure 1.

the observations of the degree of

EEG

delta activity

and

the per cent positive amytal test reSponses is demonstrated. (Fig. I)
(0) Memory Tests: In this test (5) a list of three letter common
words were presented to patients by flash cards. The cards were presented

for

10

trials. After this, lists

interpolated.

The

of

3

recall of the first

letter

list

nonsense syllables were

of words wens then

tested,

and

the number of words recalled in each session was scored.
An

impairment

in recall function

was apparent

in all subjects. This

decrement was maximal in the second and third weeks of treatment, and was
sustained as long as treatments were administered 3 times a week.

�.’

~7The

decrease in ability to recall the word

list is

noted

in the next

table.
TABLE

Impairment in Recall

III
-

%

Marked Decrement

1-3

Treatment Period
Mnch Improved (9)

Moderately Improved (h)

'

Unimproved (7)
When

h-é

7-9

10-12

O

11

33

O

0

SO

SO

0

0

1h

0

0

the scores are compared with the improvement rating, there

is

significant difference between groups. The rapid return of recall
ability to pretreatment levels when treatment frequency was reduced to
two times per week indicates that this test is a measure of only the

no

more severe degrees

of cerebral dysfunction.

tests the patient is touched
the cheek and the hand, and asked to

(6) Tactile Perceptual Tests: In these
by the examiner simultaneously on

localize the stimuli.

The

tests are repeated for

combinations of cheek, hand, shoulder and thigh.

report

one

10

trials

using varying

Persistent failure to

of the stimuli or to mislocalize a stimulus beyond the tenth

trial is indicative, in adults, of altered cerebral function (h).
In all subjects, this test was negative before treatment. Positive
two
responses were observed in 19 of the 2h patients. In nine patients,
consecutive responses were observed, and of these, six were in the much

improved and three

in the moderately improved groups.

�In the next table the positive responses were charted.with relation

to the treatment period
of positive responses

and

is to

the dlinical evaluation.
be noted

in the first

A

high incidence

two groups, and many

fewer such responses in the unimproved group.
TABLE

Face Hand Test

IV

-

%

Positive

Treatment Period
Much Improéed (11)

.
a

Moderately Improved (6)
Unimproved (7)

~

1-3

h-6

7-9

10-12

13-15

16

ho

h7

h3

60

60

h3

AB

30

O

0-

16

12

11

O

�DISCUSSION:

Three aspects of these observations warrant elaboration.

sensitivity

and

stability

The

of these indices of altered brain function

significance for a definition of altered cerebral function;
the relation of these indices during and after treatment to the clinical

and the

evaluation;

and

the relation of these observations for the theory of

electroshock action.
All

tests

showed changes during electroshock therapy,

indicating

that a state of altered cerebral function.was induced. Certain tests,
as the

EEG

and the amytal

test,

were

altered after a

few convulsions

persistently positive for cne to three weeks following
treatment. In this regard the electroencephalogram manifested the
earliest and the most sustained changes. The recall and tactile perand remained

ceptual tests also

showed changes but

week of treatment) and disappeared

.

was reduced.

Tests of recall function and

these appeared late (in the

rapidly

when

2nd

treatment frequency

tactile perceptual tests, therefore,

are less sensitive indicators of the state of cerebral function. In
any evaluation

of the relation of an induced

to another variable,
the operation (or

it is

test)

change

in brain function

important, therefore, to clearly define both

and the

sensitivity of the operation which forms

the basis for the estimation of altered cerebral function.
Because these

tests

have varying

sensitivities, the frequency of

treatment and the duration of the treatment regimen become important

variables in any assessment.

EEG

changes are maintained by infrequent

�{-10-

treatment, while changes in recall function and simultaneous tactile
perception are rapidly lost, when treatment frequency is reduced.
Of the many correlations possible with these tests of brain
function,

we have

selected the relation of these test results to the

clinical improvement rating. With the

EEG

and

clinical

much improved

patients,

relationships between the appearance of test changes
improvement are

clearly observed. In the

positive amytal tests

and high degree

EEG

tests significant

and amytal

abnormality appeared early,

were more marked, and were sustained for longer periods (on the same

treatment regimen) than in the unimproved patients.

The

moderately

improved patients were in between.

relation between altered brain function and clinical response

This

only with the data obtained during the course of therapy.

is noted
There is
results.

no

correlation of

This divergence

improvement

is related to the timing

of

test applications,

in the conclusions of other studies

and may explain the discrepancies

of

ratings with post-treatment test

this prdblem.
These observations can also be

mode of

related to an understanding of the

action of electroshock. In

postulated that the function

1952, Weinstein, Linn and Kahn (6)

of electroshock therapy was

to ”initiate

the production of a state of altered brain function in which the patient
can deny his problems." These observations support the first part of

this hypothesis, namely, that a state of altered cerebral function is
induced by electroshock. Also, in patients who.improved, the altered

state is

more prominent, appears

earlier

and

is

more

persistent than in

�.11..

those
had

who

fail to

improve.

Of

the eleven

positive amytal tests (while

positive test);

5 of

the

much improved
7

patients, all

unimproved never had a

and ten had high EEG abnormality records, while only

one of the unimproved

patients

had such a

record.

It is

our conclusion

significant degrees of altered cerebral
function are a prerequisite - a necessary, though not a sufficient
requirement - for improvement in electroshock therapy.

that early, sustained

and

�SUMMARY:

In a study of the relation of tests of altered brain function

to improvement in electroShock,
of change in brain function vary

it

was observed

that while indicators

in sensitivity, all tests indicate

the development of organic mental changes during electroshock therapy.
reason for the conflicting results reported by others can be
accounted for by the variations in the tests used, the time of study
The

difficulties in evaluating improvement.
It is our conclusion that clinical improvement in electroshock is

and the

dependent on

early, sustained

and marked changes

in mental function;

that electroshock therapy may be described as the non-specific,
traumatic induction of states of altered cerebral function in'which

and

the subject reacts with

new

patterns of adaptation.

�REFERENCES

l.

Fink,

Relation of EEG Delta Activity to
Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative
Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; PsychiatJﬁ:
M. and Kahn, R.L.:

516‘5251 1957.

Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, 5.: Serial Administration
of "Amytal Test" for Brain Disease. Its Diagnostic and
Prognostic Value, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 23;:

2. Heinstein, E.A.,

&lt;3».

217-226, 19st.

3.

Kahn, R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electro shock, A.I'I.A.

Arch. Neurol. a Psychiat., 19: 23-29, 1956.

h. Pink,

Grren, HA. and Bender, H.B.: The Face-Hand Test as a
Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurolo ﬂ. , _2_:
116—58, 1952.
1-1.,

H. , Fink, 1'1. and Kwalwasser, 8.:
Memory and Learning to Improvement

5. Korin,

I‘Ieinstein,

13.A., Linn, L. and Kahn,

shock Therapv:

Relation of Changes in
in Electroshock, Conf.

R.L.: Psychosis During Electro-

Its Relation to the

Theory of Shock Therapy,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2704">
                <text>Relation of tests of altered brain function to behavioral change following induced convulsions. In L. van Bogaert and J. Radermecker (eds.), First International Congress of Neurological Sciences. Pergamon Press, London, 1959, 3:613-619.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2705">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2706">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-39-005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2707">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2708">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.; Korin, Hyman</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2709">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2710">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2711">
                <text>Two [preprints] and one reprint. Reprint from The First International Congress of Neurological Sciences, Brussels, 1957, Vol. III EEG, Clinical Neurophysiology and Epilepsy. Peramon Press; London, New York &amp; Paris, 1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2712">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2713">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74473">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81034">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87595">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94156">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6747" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6545">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c8041bb911b27dd176a67a53d9ba080c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>51e8ec2d2ba520c72d5afb41bd417d27</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107150">
                    <text>Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy

Robert L. Kahn Ph.D. and

From

Max

Pollack Ph.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

L.I., N.Y.
Aided, in part, by grants M-927 and MY-2092 of the National
Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U.S.
Glen Oaks,

Public Health Service.
Read at the Eastern Psychiatric Research Association,
October 25, 1958.
IV: 10-2h-58

New

York,

�Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy
One

of the more important

clinical applications of

psychological testing techniques is the prediction of the
has
there
In
treatment.
in
particular,
results
psychiatric
been a considerable effort to determine valid psychological
The
to
results
somatic
the
for
therapies.
criteria
prognostic
date, however, have not found clinical acceptance.
Using the Rorschach, for example, Rabin (1) has stated
that ”single Rorschach factors cannot serve as indices or as
has
Piotrowski
In
contrast
of
improvement."
predictors
published a number of papers on the prognostic use of the
Rorschach in insulin coma and convulsive therapy (2, 3, h, S, 6).
Unfortunately, his criteria, as reported in successive papers,
are vague and contradictory. In l9h1 he reported six explicit
prognostic signs which were applied in predicting clinical
months
the
termination
of
several
after
a
over
period
response
of treatment. But Rees and Jones (7), in a study of schizophrenic
found
somatic
that
of
a
therapies,
receiving
variety
patients
Piotrowski's signs were related to the results on a chance basis
only.
The differences in the studns of various investigators
can be accounted for by methodological variables. These
variables include factors of population, number of patients
observed, the method of analyzing data, the kind of somatic
therapy utilized, and the criteria for evaluating improvement,

�-2made
in
evaluation
is
which
the
clinical
time
the
at
including
incon—
Another
for
basis
treatment.
of
relation to the course
sistent results may be the lack of an adequate theretical
framework.

in
been
have
we
engaged
several
years
past
These
were
studies
convulsive
of
therapy
the
process.
studies
mode
action
of
the
concerning
a
to
hypothesis
test
initiated
of convulsive therapy which was derived from observations on a
hypothesis
of
the
to
brain-damaged pepulation. According
Weinstein and Kahn (8, 9) the therapeutic effect of convulsive
function
brain
of
altered
the
induction
to
therapy was related
of
symbolic
a
new
type
for
conditions
the
creating
necessary
adaptation, mainly denial, in characterologically disposed
shown
altered
that
have
Our
already
studies
previous
persons.
change
behavioral
for
condition
a
function
is
brain
necessary
(10, 11) and that the manifestation of denial language patterns
with treatment is related to the evaluation of improvement (12).
The purpose of the present report is
l) to summarize the
the
and
demonstrate
2)
to
on
personality factors,
findings
application of these findings as prognostic criteria for
convulsive therapy.
For the

�Method:

studies were conducted at Hillside Hospital, a
non-profit, voluntary, mental hospital, admitting patients
who are considered as having early and curable illnesses.
Psychotherapy is the principal treatment employed, with
somatic therapies available when needed. The material presented was collected in a series of studies during a period of
three and a half years. While a total of 180 patients have been
investigated, varying numbers were tested with each of the
techniques of personality evaluation. The patients ranged in
age from 20 to 66, with a median of hS, and included twice as
These

many women as men.

All patients received convulsive therapy administered
three times a week, using either a Medcraft alternating current
instrument or a Reiter C-h? electrostimulator. A minimum of
12 treatments was given, with the total course determined by
the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the convulsive therapy
unit. All psychological procedures were adminstered in the
week prior to the start of treatment.
The determination of the patient's response to treatment
was based on the medical director's evaluation at the time of
discharge, usually within six to eight weeks following treatment.

�Procedures and Results:
1.

Family Interviews.

According to the original

theory, it was considered that persons showing characteristics
of the "explicit verbal denial" personality, as described by
Weinstein and Kahn (13) would be most likely to show a behavioral change rated as improvement following treatment. This
was tested in a standardized interview with members of the
patient's family, eliciting information on the patient's
attitudes, mode of communication and reactions to stress.
Fifteen areas of behavior considered to be related to denial
tendencies were scored from the interview material. A score
of O, 1 and 2 was given for each item, depending on whether
the designated behavior was minimally, moderately or markedly
shown. The sum of the scores thus obtained was used as the
denial score.
The relatives of h? patients were interviewed, and
denial personality scores ranged from O to 25, with a median
of 11. The patients were divided into two groups: those with
scores from 11 to 25 were classed as "high denial," and those
from 0 to 10 as the ”low denial" group.

results of this analysis were significant, showing
that of the patients with high denial scores, 58% were in the
much improved group and only one patient was unimproved. Of
the patients with low denial scores, on the other hand, only
The

30%

were much improved and an equal number were unimproved (1h).

�-5-

results based on family interviews
felt that our conceptions of prognostic

Although these
were promising,

we

personality factors could be extended and made more amenable
to practical application by the use of standardized psycholog-

ical procedures.
For this purpose the Rorschach test
2.

The

Rorschach Test:

We

used.
have obtained Rorschach
was

protocols in 87 patients receiving convulsive therapy. The
&amp;
of
the
to
records were scored according
Klopfer
criteria
Kelley (15). Only those components were analyzed which were
considered related to the personality aspects under study.
It was found (16) that the much improved patients had

significantly fewer total number of responses, and a significantly
greater per cent of whole and form responses than did those
The
who
rated
as
unimproved.
were
stereotypy and
patients
limited imaginative capacity of the much improved patients
was also shown by their giving a greater percentage of popular
responses, with little diversification of content categories.
They were less likely to have any kind of shading response.
Those patients who had human movement (M) responses had the
poorest clinical responses, while those with no movement of
any kind had the best results. With respect to color, an F6
response was associated with a poor clinical result, while those
with no color at all did very well.
Combining some of these factors tended to sharpen the
differentiation in terms of outcome. Thus, of those who had

�.6.
In
much
improved.
as
rated
both
M
much
66%
improved
FC,
were
with
nor
neither
those
of
contrast,
and only one patient was unimproved.
We have converted these results into prognostic criteria,
M

and FC, only

as shown

in Table

I.

17%

In one column are

listed those

Rorschach

closely related to a favorable
In the other column are those factors which are

factors which have been
prognosis.

were

most

For
example,
outcome.
unfavorable
clinical
of
an
prognostic
67%
much
were
of those patients with ten or less responses
16
more
with
or
those
of
28%,
responses
however,
Only
improved.
had a good

result.

�TABLE

I

Prognostic Rorschach Indices of ImErovement
Favorable Prognosis
%

Unfavorable Prognosis

Much

%

Ingroved

Improved

of Responses

Number

Movement

Color
F

and

FC

less

(67%)

16 or more

(28%)

present
present

(28%)

None

(63%)

M

No FC

(60%)

FC

-

75

a:

Shading
M

10 or

~

100

None

Much

(21%)

(59%)

o - 59

(27%)

(58%)

Present

(33%)

Neither Present

(66%)

Both Present(17%)

�’8-

It

should also be noted that comparison of post treatment

Rorschach records with those obtained prior to treatment failed
to show any significant change. This confirms similar observa-

tions by others (6, 17, 18, 19) and indicates that the Rorschach
pattern is probably a reflection of the basic personality rather
than transient aspects of the disease process.
3. Social Attitudes: The F Scale. While these Rorschach
results amply confirm the concept of the relation of personality
factors and results of treatment, further data was obtained in
application of measures of social attitude such as the California
F Scale.
This scale, originally developed in studies of ethnOa
centrism and authoritarianism (20) has been increasingly used
in the study of more central psychological processes. In our
laboratory the F Scale has been regarded primarily as a reflection
of stereotyped thinking and communication. It has been observed
that patients who receive convulsive therapy at Hillside Hospital
P
scores than those given psychotherapy
higher
significantly
alone (21).
In these studﬂs a ten-item modification of the F Scale
(22) has been used. The test is rapidly administered, taking no
longer than 10 minutes in most cases. The subject reads 10
ambiguous statements and indicates whether he agrees or disagrees
with each statement, and to what extent. The score given for
each item ranges from one to seven and the range of total scores
is 10 to 70. The greater the agreement, the higher the score

have

�-9-

statements themselves are extreme, conventional
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one of the statements
is: "If people would talk less and work more, everybody would
obtained.

be

The

better off."
This

test

patients prior to
score of ho as a cut-off point,we

has been given to 96

convulsive therapy. Using a
found that of those patients with scores of ho or more 71% were
rated as recovered or much improved. In contrast, only 36% of
those with scores below ho were so rated. In general, the

higher the score, the better the clinical result.
We have also tested an additional 13 patients, referred
for convulsive therapy, but who either refused treatment or
terminated it of their own accord prior to completion. Of
these, eleven had F scores below ho, an observation consistent
with the general expectation that such persons haVB a poor
response to convulsive therapy.

�-10-

Discussion:
These observations have shown

that in the course of the

investigation of theoretical problems of convulsive therapy,
certain standard psychological procedures have provided data
which is significantly related to the therapeutic outcome. This
data can now be applied to the practical problem of clinical
prognosis.

that

favorable improvement rating is given
to those patients who develop euphoric, hypomanic or denial modes
of adaptation following treatment (23). Such behavioral change
is most likely to occur in persons whose premorbid personalities
may be characterized as non-empathic, non-introspective, nonverbally communicative and highly conventional and stereotyped
with little imaginative or creative capacity (1h). On the
Rorschach prior to treatment these patients give few reaponses,
fail to show human movement, shading or integrated color responses
(F0) and have little variety of content. 0n the F Scale, their
scores were apt to be over b0, showing a high degree of stereotypy in their communication.
In contrast to such patients, others are either unchanged
by convulsive therapy or develop such modes of reaction as panic,
paranoid behavior, or increased somatic concern, such as
We

have found

a

complaints about their memory. These patients are rated as
unimproved. While this latter group of patients showed diverse
patterns in their premorbid personality characteristics, they
were more apt to be imaginative, introspective and less stereotxnd
in their communications. On the Rorschach they gave human

�-11movement, integrated color and shading responses, and were more
On
good
than
the
prognosis patients.
diversified in their content
the F Scale their scores were most likely to be under ho.

finding that meaningful prognostic criteria can be
derived on the basis of personality constellation rather than in
terms of nosological entities has important implications. For
one thing, this conception leads to the use of further psychologSuch
application is
for
prognostic
ical techniques
purposes.
laboratory
Secondat
Hillside
under
in
Hospital.
our
way
currently
mental
of
increased
an
understanding
derive
to
is
possible
ly, it
disorders, their management and prevention. Thus, we have previously noted (1h) that the same personality factors which are
related to a good prognosis with convulsive therapy, are etiologof
of
psychiathe
certain
types
development
in
important
ically
tric disorder. Studies of patients with psychiatric depression,
for example, demonstrated a prominence of premorbid personality
patterns characterized by the inability to communicate verbally
(2b), and rigidity and lack of imagination (25). Such persons
and
verbal
conventional
to
techniques
are generally refractory
require non-verbal therapeutic techniques. It seems that the
same personality factors which make a person responsdve to nonverbal forms of therapy are involved in his susceptibility to a
depressive reaction. The same stereotypy and conventionality
which lead to a catastrophic response in the individual faced by
the sudden loss of a job or close relative, permit the develop-. t
ment of denial, minimization and displacement under the conditions
of altered brain function and are considered "improved" by the
family and the therapist.
The

�-12-

that in the course of investigation of
theoretical problems of convulsive therapy, certain standard
psychological procedures have provided data which is
significantly related to the therapeutic outcome. This data
can now be applied to the practical problem of clinical
We

have shown

prognosis.
On the Rorschach test, those patients without human
movement, shading or integrated color (FC) responses, few

total responses,

and with

little originality

or variety of

content have the best prognosis. On the F Scale, a score of
less than no is prognostic of a poor clinical reaponse.
The theoretical conception developed in these studies
leads to the application of additional psychological techniques
for prognostic purposes, and to an increasing understanding of
the etiology of psychiatric syndromes with its implications
for management and prevention of such disorders.

�-13-

W
REFERENCES

1.

Rabin, A.I.: Effects of Electric Shock Treatment Upon
Some Aspects of Personality and Intellect, Am. Psychol.
23 28,4,

19b7o

5'1

Rorschach
the
of
Possibilities
Z.:
Prognostic
Piotrowski,
Method in Insulin Treatment, Psychiat. Quart. $3:
679, 1938.

3.

Piotrowski, Z.: Rorschach Manifestations of Improvement
Med.
Psychosom.
in Insulin Treated Schizophrenics,
508’ 1939.

6.

l:

A
the
Device
for
Experimental
Z.:
Single
Piotrowski,
in
Prediction of Outcome of Insulin Treatment19h0
Schizophrenia, Psychiat. Quart. lg: 26?,
Aid
in
Method
a
Prognostic
Rorschach
as
2.:
Piotrowski,
the Insulin Shock Treatment of Schizophrenics,
19h1.
807,
Quart.
lg:
Psychiat.
Effects
N.D.C.:
Z.
and
Lewis,
Piotrowski,
B.L.,
Pacella,
of Electric Convulsive Therapy on Certain Personality
10h:
Am.J.
in
Psychiat.
Traits
Psychiatric Patients,

83, 19h7.

An
Rorschach
of
the
A.M.:
Evaluation
Jones,
Test as aPrognostic Aid in the Treatment of
Coma
Therapy, Electronarcosia
Insulin
by
Schizophrenics
&amp;
Leucotomy, J. Ment. Sci.
Therapy
Electroconvulsive

Rees, W.L. and

21:681, 1951.
Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During
Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of
Shock Therapy, Am. J. Psychiat. 109: 22, 1952.
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Denual of Illness:
Symbolic and Physiological Aspects, Springfield, Ill.
C.C. Thomas, 1955.

10.
11.

12.

of
M.
E.A.:
Relation
and
Weinstein,
Fink,
R.L.,
Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electro&amp;
1956.
23,
Neurol.
Arch.
shock,
lg:
Psychiat.
EEG
M.
of
Delta Activity
and
Relation
R.L.:
Kahn,
Fink,
to Behavioral Responses in Electroshock: Quantitative
&amp;
1957.
516,
Neurol.
Arch.
Psychiat.1§:
Serial Studies,

Kahn,

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During

Electro-

shock Therapy. In Psychopathology of Communication,
&amp;
New
Grune
York,
Roch, P. and Zubin, J. Eds.,
Stratton, 1958.

�~1h—

13.

Factors in
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Personality
&amp;
Neurol.
Arch.
Denial of Illness,
Psychiat. Q2:
355, 1953.

Personality Factors in Behavioral
Response to Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol. (in
press).

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.;

New
The
Rorschach
D.:
Technique.
Kelley,
Klopfer,
York, World Book Co., 1§E§.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Prognostic Value of Rorschach
Criteria in Clinical Response to Convulsive Therapy.
Paper read at Electroshock Research Association
meeting, San Francisco, 1958.
Beck, S.J.: Effects of Shock Therapy on Personality as
Shown by the Rorschach Test, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
ﬁg: h83, 19h3.
Kelley, D., Margolis, H. and Barrera, S.E.: Stability of
the Rorschach Method as Demonstrated in Electric
Convulsive Therapy Cases, Rorsch.Res.Exch. 5: 35, 19b1.

B. and

16.

17.

18.
19.
20.

21.
22.
23.

Kisker, G.W.:

A

Projective Approach to Personality Patterns

During InsulinéShock and Metrazol-Convulsive Therapy,
&amp;
Soc. Psych. 21: 120, 19h2.
Abn.
J.
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D.J. and
New
The
York,
Authoritarian
R.N.:
Personality,
Sanford,
Harper, 1950.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental
HOSpital, J. Hillside Hosp. g: 216, 1957.
Levinson, D.: Personal communication.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L.: Behavioral Patterns in Induced
States of Altered Brain Function. Paper read at
Divisional meeting, American Psychiatric Association,
Kahn,

New

York, 1957.

.
A

a

A.

N

a__.....

..-

Cohen, M.B., Baker, R.G., Cohen, R.A., Fromm-Reichmann, F.
and Weigart, E.V.: An Intensive Study of Twelve Cases
of Manic-Depressive Psychosis, Ps chiatr , 11: 103,

195h.

.A-aL.......;.—..M.u

~.~

,
i

Hamilton,

D.M. and Mann, W.A.:

Hospital Treatment of
In Depression, Hoch, P. and
&amp;

Involutional Psychoses.
Zubin, J. Eds., New York, Grune

pp. 199-209-

Stratton, 1952,

j
5

E

t

i
2

1

s

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67464">
                <text>Robert L. Kahn and Max Pollack: Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in Convulsive Therapy, 1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67465">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67466">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-14-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67467">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67468">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67469">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67470">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67471">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67472">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67473">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80949">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87510">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94071">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100632">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6745" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6547">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/547dda87f02e63e10815bbd8bd8b58a3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2de3623b012b67ce51e9e637220d0b84</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107152">
                    <text>Role of EEG Frequency

Shift in Behavioral Effects of

Drugs

mmmm.*
During the past few years

we

have been

interested in the interrelation-

ship of changes in various measures of brain function and the behavioral
response of psychiatric patients to somatic therapies.
were devoted

Our

initial

studies

to the changes in tactile perceptual tasks in patients with

organic psychoses. This study, carried out at Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital,
demonstrated that patients with active organic psychotic reactions made

repeated errors in the simple task of reporting two simultaneously applied
cutaneous stimuli.

The

persistence of such‘errors

was

interpreted as an

index to the presence of an "organic mental syndrome."

In the

initial studies at Hillside

Heepital in 1952, the

same

patterns of errors were observed in patients receiving convulsive therapy.
we then became interested in the role of altered brain function in the
"improvement" induced by convulsive therapy.
we

In our

first

group of

patients

followed consecutive electroshock referrals with weekly measures of

changes

in brain function

of brain function:

and

memory

clinical interviews.

tests,

simultaneous

we

used four indices

tactile tests, the amobarbital

test for organic brain disease described by Weinstein and Kahn, and the
degree of induced delta activity in the EEG. It was soon apparent that
neither the memory scales nor the tactile tests were sufficiently sensitive
indicators of alteration in brain function to be satisfactory for our
purposes. The amobarbital

test,

however, was a

sensitive indicator. In

this test, the subject is asked a series of questions regarding his illness
the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,
Island, N.Y.
Read at the Section of Neurology and Psychiatry, Queens County Medical
Society, June 3, 1958.

Frcm
Long

‘

�.2and

orientation for place, date, time

and

person. Following the

administration of intravenous amobarbital until the patient has nystagmns,
the questions are repeated. Errors of confabulation and disorientation

are scored as "positive" tests, and have been found almost exclusively in
subjects with active cerebral dysfunction. In the patients in the
electroshock series, a significant relationship was observed between
changes

in this test and impmvement ratings in convulsive therapy.

Amobarbitﬂ Test
EST

-

Improvement

#1

“----‘--- u..---.--—----—--——-we

in the

also measured the changes in
EEG.

ﬁne degree

of induced delta activity

Examination of a series of preliminary records, as well as

the description in the literature, demonstrated the early development and
‘persistence of Slow wave activity in the

EEG

during convulsive therapy.

this preliminary information, we obtained weekly records during and
‘We measured
of
treatment.
a
after course
specified leads for the per-cent
time delta, the slowest frequency, highest voltage of delta and the duration

With

of burst activity. Using these quantitative indices
180 records

activity.

in
The

we

ranked the

initial

patients according to the extent of the induced delta
upper third were classed as ”high degree delta records,"

2h

the middle third as "middle or'moderate degree delta" and the lowest third
as "low degree delta

activity."

High, Middle and

Low

Delta

-

EST

#1

�.3 When we

related the development of high degree delta activity to

improvement

rating, a signiﬁicant relationship
Fig.
EEE

was

again demonstrated.

5

Delta - Improvement -

EST

#1

---—-—------ -—------ yo--— --—‘-..- ~-

In subsequent months

development of high degrees of

third

to

EEG

delta activity during the second and

ratings. In the next table,
these observations in the next Sh patients.

weeks of treatment

have summarized

a predictive study, relating the

we embarked on

improvement

F1

.

we

6

Table: Patients High Delta 2nd, 3rd weeks of Treatment
EST

2’ 3’

’4

-_------- ----—----‘u-n-—---------_-----m-‘-----—----By

this time

we

believed that

EEG

delta activity

was

related to the

behavioral changes in convulsive therapy, and

its significance

in a control convulsive-subconvulsive study.

Of

was

tested

consecutive convulsive

therapy referrals, randomly selected patients were subjected to a course
of subconvulsive therapy instead of the convulsive therapy. This

to the patients or their therapists. 0f the

substitution

was unknown

subjects

received convulsive therapy in this series, high degree delta

who

activity records

were observed

in

of treatment. Of the 27 Subjects

3h during the second
who

to the fourth

h?

weeks

received subconvulsive therapy,

however, none demonstrated either-high or middle degree

delta activity

�.u.
EEG
.

records during any week of treatment. In concurrent behavioral

evaluations,

of the h? subjects in the convulsive group

h2

behavioral change, while only
showed such

3

showed marked

of the 27 in the subconvulsive group

a change. In clinical improvement ratings, 2h of h? were

rated "recovered" and

"much improved;" 15

"unimproved or worse."

But

as "improved" and

8

as

of the subconvulsive group,only

3

were

"recovered" and "much improved," 5 as "improved" and

19

rated

as "unimproved

cr'worse."
we were now

convinced

that high degree of

EEG

delta activity reflected

the physiologic changes essential to the behavioral change in convulsive

therapy.

An

alteration in brain function, sufficient

induce considerable

-

and of

the kind to

activity appeared to be the prerequisite,
not sufficient factor - in the convulsive therapy

EEG

a necessary, ﬂaough

slow wave

process. Perhaps a similar relationship was observable in other somatic

therapies?
we

next examined insulin

activity is induced,
hours after gavage.
receiving deep
or prolonged

which
Not

coma

therapy. During each coma,

EEG

delta

usually persists for a few minutes to a few

infrequently - in approximately 1/3 of patients

insulin therapy in our hospital, seizures, aphasia
result. After such events, EEG changes of delta activity

coma

coma

persist for days,
The relation

'

and

in cases of prolonged

between prolonged coma,

coma,

for

weeks and months.

altered brain function and

behavioral response has been discussed by numerous authors. Revitch
reported eight cases and concluded that improvement was related to the
induction of organic brain damage, similar to lobotomy. Yaeger et a1

�-5.
noted a correlation between length of coma, degree of organic confusion,
remission of mental symptoms and degree of
of prolonged coma.

EEG

In reviewing our insulin

abnormality in 12 cases

coma

experiences,

noted

we

that our best clinical results have been observed in prolonged coma cases.
As a result, it has been the intention of our staff to induce such a state.
Persistent
coma

EEG

delta activity has been observed in a small

subjects, and only in those with prolonged

neurologic signs. Thus, in insulin

coma

number of our

or persistent

also, a relation between
delta change and behavioral response is indicated.
Concurrent with these investigations, We had begun clinical

EEG

coma

investigations with the newer tranquilhers. Initial study of Raudixin

in

1953

He were

failed to indicate

any

clinical efficacy.

able to administer large doses - up to 10

With
mgm.

reserpine, however,
At these

levels,

behavioral change become prominent but so also did neurologic complications.
Parkinsonism was readily induced, and seizure induction and increased

clinical depression became prominent. The EEG changes on chronic administration were small. With our doses, desynchronization was apparent, but at
higher dosage hyperSynchrony was also noted.
With chlorpromazine, however, we were more

fortunate.

we had undertaken

a control insulin coma-chlorpromazine study, in'which the experimental
dosage called

for levels sufficient to induce clinical parkinsonism. In

three of the thirty patients grand mal seizures were induced. In

all

patients significant changes were observed in serial EEGs. These consisted
of increased modulation, increase in per-cent time alpha, and in twenty
patients lOW'voltage theta and delta activity.

On

hyperventilation, delta

�burst activity was observed.
In reviewing the experiences of others,

noted numerous reports
of chlorpremazine inducing seizures; exaggerating seizure activity in

epileptics; and activating seizure
available for reserpine.

EEG

we

records. Similar reports are

review of the electroencephalographic effects of various phreno-

A

tropics demonstrated that not all newer agents induced
Meprobamate,

in clinical doses, induces

an increase

in

activity.

slow wave
EEG

fast activity,

with increased voltage and Spindling. The records are most similar to

barbiturate records.
Benactyzine (or suavitil) induced neither slow nor

fast

activity
but desynchronized the record, with flattening of voltages and loss of
wave

whatever rhythmicity was present.

clinical experience we were impressed that chlorprcmazine
and reserpine were the most effective modifiers of psychotic behavior,
with benactyzine and meprobamate as relatively inefficient agents. It
From our

seemed

appropriate therefore to extend the neurophysiologic adaptive

hypothesis of the

it was

mode

of action of convulsive and insulin
EEG

frequencies to the delta range would

active in modifying psychotic behavior; while those that induce a

shift to the beta range, or
As a

corollary

it was

desynchronize the record would be less effective.

suggested that agents that induce no change in brain

function or changes so small as not to be reflected in serial
have

therapies;

suggested therefore, that agents that induce a change in brain

function reflected by a shift in
be most

coma

little

EEGs

would

behavioral effect. Thus, a classification of newer phrenotropic

�-7drugs based on

their

EEG

effects

was suggested:

(3) Increased slow wave activity with hypersynchrony
(b) Desynchronization with voltage and frequency irregularity,
.and
(0)

irregular theta

Increased high voltage

fast activity

In reviewing the available literature reports of promazine and perphenazine
would indicate

delta range.

that these agents induce a shift in the
Mepazine has minimal

EEG

effects,

EEG

spectrum to the

and these are

largely

desynchronization. Information regarding other newer agents was not

available.
we
EEG

have undertaken two studies based on

changes to behavior.

One

is serial

EEG

this hypothesis relating
studies of patients

receiving chronic tranquilizer medication at the hospital.
a study of the

relation

acute administration:

between the

EEG

and

A

now

second

is

the behavioral effects on

the data of our chronic administration studies

are not yet available, but the acute studies have progressed sufficiently
to danonstrate the applicability of the hypothesis.
Fbllowing the observations by Denber

derivatives, diethazine,

elicit
some
EEG

when

that

one of

the phenothiazine

administered with chlorpromazine, would

activity similar to convulsive therapy, we undertook
explorations of this compound. In the EEG laboratory with continuous
31 w wave

recording, varying amounts of diethazine from 100 to 250 mg. were

administered intravenously over a 10 minute period in psychiatric patients

at various stages of the convulsive therapy process. Instead of hyperynchrony, patients who were pretreatment and without EEG delta activity,
demonstrated significant desynchronization of the record.

�-8Fig. 7,
EEG

- Diethazine - Pretreatment

interesting, however,

Most

8

was

the effect of diethasine in patients with

increased slow wave activity during convulsive therapy. Here, too,
desynchronization became manifest, and there was a decrease in the voltage
and per-cent time

of the induced delta activity.

EEG

- Diethazine - Delta Activity

effects, we observed distinctive
behavioral changes. Patients became more irritable and restless; they
Concurrent with these

complained of sensations of

extremities. In

some,

EEG

unreality,

visual illusory

and of dysesthesias of the
phenomena and

delusional thoughts

their illness, the setting of the test procedures or our identity.
There were changes in their language patterns opposite to that previously

about

described for amobarbital, so that denial, minimization, cliches, third
person

mode and

past tense were less prominent.

The

duration of these

behavioral and language changes was from one to five hours.
changes were of similar duration

administration and disappearing

The EEG

- appearing during the period of

when

drug

the behavior had apparently reverted

to the pretreatment state.
The

ability of diethazine to

activity led to

an evaluation of

induce

other

illusory

known

and

hallucinatory

hallucinogens. In checking

�-9the literature

we

noted

that

that mescaline reversed the

Denber and Merlis had previously described
EEG

changes induced by electroshock,

in a

fashion identical with diethazine. Pennes had observed hallucinogenic

activity for another experimental compound Win 2299. We obtained some
of this material, and repeated our diethazine studies. Here, too,
Win 2299 induced EEG desynchronization associated with clinical patterns
of restlessness, excitement, hallucinatory and illusory activity.

Fig. 11,
Win 2299

We

repeated these studies with

was a

-

12
EEG

LSD, and

again the same patterns. There

difference in the time constant, but concurrent with the behavioral

effects

we

observed

EEG

changes.

Recalling the ability of benactyzine to desynchronize records,

this

compound

intravenously, and again,

we

observed the same

we

EEG

administered

pattern of

desynchronization, associated with restlessness and excitement. While

not observe the illusory and hallucinatory patterns,
kinds of language changes in these patients that

we

we

did note the

we

did

same

observed with diethazine.

�Fig. 16, 17
Benactyzine

The

chemistry of these compounds

Thus, from each of these agents,

-

EEG

is noted in the next figure:

EEG

desynchronization was induced, and

hallucinogenic or excitatory activity was observed.
we can.now

amplify our

initial

hypothesis to encompass hallucinogens.

like to refer first to conclusions described in
l9Sh by Wikler in a study of the effects of mescaline, n-allylnormorphine
In-this regard, I

and morphine

in

would

man,

in

which he

stated:

"....

regardless of the drug

administered, shifts in the pattern of electroencephalogram in the direction
of desynchronization occurred in association with anxiety, hallucinations,

fantasies, illusions or tremors, and in the direction of synchronbation.with
euphoria, relaxation or drowsiness." ‘We would now generalize our observations
of

EEG

changes and behavior to note

shift to the delta
behavior. Agents that

and

that agents that induce

EEG

synchronization

range are potent agents in the control of psychotic

induce synchronization in the beta range are relaxant,

euphoriant and sedative, while agents that desynohronize the record tend to
be

hallucinogenic.
This hypothesis lends

itself to

a variety of applications.

It provides

a bases for the understanding of the mode of action of various organic

�-11-

therapies in psychiatry.

EEG

analysis

may

also provide a basis for the

assay of new drugs and therapy procedures. Finally, these observations

permit a more rational management of the somatic therapies.

to explore each application in

summary

I would like

fashion.

application of the neurophysiologic adaptive hypothesis - for
that is the rubric under which we subsume the relationship between the
The

in brain function, reflected by the EEG, and the changes in
behavior - to insulin coma therapy has already been described. we have
changes

applied this concept to our studies of phrenotropic agents, and have
been able, both

It is

predictively

and

retrospectively, to assess

new

agents.

possible to understand lobotomy therapy, and sleep therapy,

within this framework.
As

is

for the assay of

drugs, our explorations into hallucinogens

that each of the potent hallucinogens
a biochemical similarity in a common tertiary amine radical connected

one example.

have

new

we

have recently noted

by an ethyl linkage to a large nucleus.
compounds

with this linkage.

One

On

this basis,

we

sought

for

group are known anti-parkinson agents

with anti-cholinergic properties as parsidol, artane, kemadrin, panparnit
and benadryl.

we have

not yet tested these compounds for their

EEG

or

clinical effects. Recently, Pfeiffer reported at the Academy of Neurology
that these compounds, in trained subjects, were identified most with LSD.
In 1956, Gottlieb reported that benadryl desynchronized the

patients, much as we saw this evening.
available in the literature.
shock

EEG

of electro-

Thus, some confinnation

is

�.12With regard to the

third

therapies - this hypothesis

ammﬂication

may

- the

management of somatic

be of considerable help.

In convulsive

therapy and in drug therapies, the patient'who responds in a favorable

fashion is‘no problem. But what of the patients

who

responds poorly,

or not at all? Could the failure of response be related to inadequate
dosage?

In electroshock,

when a

patient manifests paranoid or withdrawal

behavior, or no significant change, an

If

the record

we may assume

fails to

EEG

provides a guide to management.

demonstrate high voltage slow wave

that treatment has been inadequate,

activity, then

and continue the

treatnent course or increase the frequency or alter the convulsant
method.

If

EEG

changes are present, then we would assume

that other

factors - personality, sociologic or interpersonal - are not conducive
to "improvement" by electroshock, and other remedies sought. Similar
applications are possible for phrenotropic agents.
In summary,

we

believe that somatic therapies in psychiatry exert

their effects primarily by altering brain function. Changes in the
EEG Spectrum are one reflection of sudatalteration and are useful as
a guide to the mode of action, effectiveness and application of somatic

therapies.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67444">
                <text>Role of EEG Frequency Shift in Behavioral Effects of Drugs, 1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67445">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67446">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-12-011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67447">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67448">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67449">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67450">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67451">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67452">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67453">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80947">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87508">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94069">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100630">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="254" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="45">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/a0dd669fe6ef80d3f920fa82ad004579.pdf</src>
        <authentication>922f3407ada0d1bf7f975f2fcd3d0f5a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100671">
                    <text>From

the Journal of the Hillside

Vol. VI October, 1957.

I1oslojfoait,

ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL
CUTANEOUS STIMULI1
HYMAN KORIN, PH.D.2

and

MAX FINK, M.D.3

In the course of extensive investigations (1, 2, 3) into the perception of multiple simultaneous stimuli, the pattern of failure of
subjects accurately to report one of two stimuli led to a concept of
an “order of dominance” in cutaneous perception. Since then, the
relationship of the observed pattern of dominance to biologic and
psychiatric concepts of body image and body scheme has been the
subject of considerable speculation (4, 7, 8, 14).
The interrelationship of body areas was initially clearly demonstrated in simultaneous tactile tests of face and hand (2), in which it
was noted that the stimuli to the hand were frequently not reported
or mislocalized. These phenomena of “extinction” and “displacement” led to the inference that cheek area stimuli were “dominant”
to hand stimuli. In subsequent reports (3, 10, ll, 12) a
pattern of
dominance for tactile stimuli was described in which the face and
the primary genital areas were the most perceptive or dominant
areas; the hand was the least dominant; and the shoulder, foot,
buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen fell between these extremes in a mild gradient. These observations were made in normal
adults and children and psychiatric patients, but were most clearly
discerned in patients with brain disease. Indeed, the major portion
of the data relates to a group of patients with severe diffuse brain
dysfunction under observation in a general psychiatric hospital.
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M—927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service.
2Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital.
3 Director,
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
241

�242

KORIN—FINK

unclear. In a review of the
problem (3) consideration was given to hypotheses ascribing signiﬁcance to anatomic, psychophysical, genetic, environmental and neurophysiologic factors. In their conclusions, Bender, Green and Fink
of
the
organization
“no
explains
that
adequately
theory
one
note
this pattern. Learning and maturation are probably factors, but it
brain
with
of
studies
In
inherent.”
be
patients
to
mostly
appears
disease and normal young children, Cohn (4, 5) emphasized the
rostral order of dominance and ascribed signiﬁcance to “an ontogenetic or phylogenetic thalamic residue in the sensory organization
of the human brain.” He also noted speciﬁcally that this pattern
was primarily associated with “the over-all sentient function of
the brain.”
A more extensive elaboration of a maturational and developmental explanation of the order of dominance has been proposed
(14). Taking the infantile patterns of sucking and feeding as a
model, Linn ascribes dominance to the face as it is the oldest element
in the body image; the dominant role of the genital area to the intensity of pleasurable sensation that the infant elicits from masturbation; and the subordinate position of the hand to its role as an
second
holds
it
wherein
and
appendage
tension-relieving
exploring
place in awareness to its stimulation of the more exciting mouth
and genitalia.
A neurophysiologic view was advanced by Critchley (6, 7), who,
after expressing a preference for the term “tactile inattention” instead of “extinction,” emphasized the rostral order of dominance.
He stated that “strong stimulation of the healthy side suppresses
the attenuated sensations on the impaired side,” and concluded
that “tactile inattention in parietal patients is probably no more
than an instance of local neglect or disregard, which may be demonstrated at times in many other spheres of consciousness besides the
tactile—whether motor, visual or spatial.”
A psychophysical explanation was eschewed by Bender, Fink and
Green (3, 10, 11), who found no relation between the order of
dominance and the tactile threshold for touch or pin prick. DennyBrown, Meyer and Horenstein (8), however, insisted that these patloss
of
alteration
there
when
or
was
an
only
terns were
apparent
the
that
demonstrated
exfurther
discrimination.
They
two-point
tinction of the hand stimulus by a stimulus to the leg could be
cheek
the
of
dominance
hand.
The
the
stimuli
four
to
overcome by
the
stimuli
altered
to
be
ten
by
however,
could
hand
the
not,
to
hand in their subject.

The basis for these phenomena

is”

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

243

The following data further emphasize psychophysical factors in
perception under the conditions of multiple simultaneous stimulation. These studies represent the initial report of an investigation
into the application of simultaneous tactile stimulation tests to the
problem of measurement of the alteration in brain function induced by electroshock therapy. In the course of this study electrical
stimuli were applied to the cheek and hand of psychiatric patients.
Stimuli were either at threshold or suprathreshold levels.
Two aspects of the data are presented: (a) the effect of alteration
of relative strength of stimulus in the order of dominance on facehand tests; and (b) relation of perceptual thresholds to the order of
dominance.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

The subjects were thirty-four consecutive psychiatric patients
referred for electroshock therapy. The range of their ages was between 21 and 65 and the mean age was 45. Eleven patients were
diagnosed as involutional melancholia, thirteen as manic-depressive,
depressed, eight as schizophrenia, and two as psychoneurosis mixed
type. All testing was done prior to a course of electroshock therapy
and no patient had clinical or EEG evidence of altered brain function. Each patient was tested in one session for the purposes of this
report.
Two model S-4B Grass square wave stimulators were synchronized to deliver either single or two simultaneous electrical stimuli.
An isolation unit was connected to each stimulator to eliminate
artifacts and the output was monitored visually by an oscilloscope.
A switch box inserted in the circuit permitted independent selection
of the various body parts. An active and an indifferent electrode,
required for each body part, were small 3%; inch steel discs placed
1 inch
apart and secured with tape. Bentonite electrode paste (Medcraft) was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes
were applied. The electrodes remained affixed to the selected body
parts throughout the period of testing.
The patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine position. To alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described. It was emphasized that only a slight tap-like sensation
would be felt. The electrodes were then placed on (I) the dorsum
of the hands, (2) the mandibular area of both cheeks, and (3) the
medial calf area of the legs.
In the testing procedure, thresholds for the various body parts
were ﬁrst determined. At a frequency of .3 cycles /second, and a pulse

�244

KORIN—FINK

duration of 50 milliseconds, the voltage was increased in uniform
time increments of .67 seconds (2 pulses) monitored from the oscilloscope, until the subject perceived 100 per cent of the stimuli. Increments of 5 volts were applied to the hand and increments of 1 volt
to the cheeks. After a ten-second interval, the voltage was decreased
until sensation disappeared. Following another ten-second interval,
the voltage was gradually increased by 1 volt each six seconds until
the patient again reported 100 per cent of the stimuli. This reading
was considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold

sensation.
Such stimuli, at threshold and 10 per cent above the threshold,
are reported by the subjects as a “tap,” a “prick” or a “sting.” Complaints of painful perception were not elicited at these levels of
stimulation.
After the thresholds were determined, testing with a series of
single and double simultaneous stimuli followed. The body parts
tested were the right hand and left cheek (heterologous stimulation)
and the right cheek and left cheek (homologous stimulation). Both
parts were stimulated simultaneously, or one part singly, in a mixed
order for ten trials for each of the following conditions: (1) threshold, (2) suprathreshold (10 per cent above the threshold), (3) one
body part at suprathreshold and the other at threshold, and (4) the
reverse of (3). The order of presentation of conditions (1) and (2)
was alternated for different subjects and the same was done for
conditions (3) and (4). Similarly the order of presentation of the
heterologous and homologous stimulation was alternated.
Single stimuli were introduced as a control. Failure to report
the single stimulus indicated that the threshold had changed. When
this change occurred, stimulation was increased until a new threshold was determined and ten trials were started anew.
RESULTS

Threshold Values
The threshold stimulation for perception was determined for
the hands, cheeks and legs (Table I). The threshold values for the
hands and legs are three to four times higher than the thresholds
for the cheeks. While the threshold values in the legs are less than
in the hands, these differences lack statistical signiﬁcance. Variability of the threshold is considerably greater in the hands and legs
than in the cheeks. There is virtually no overlapping of thresholds,
however, Where the cheeks and the hands are concerned.
A.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

245

I
Mean Thresholds and Standard Deviations of Body Parts
TABLE

Mean
Thresholds (volts)
Standard
Deviation

Right

Cheek

Left
Cheek

Right
Hand

Left
Hand

Right

Leg

Left
Leg

6.76

7.85

29.25

22.35

24.50

19.52

4.47

4.86

14.88

13.60

13.99

13.64

Extinction Patterns
The difference between the number of extinctions of the right
hand or the left cheek on stimulation of both parts with either
threshold or suprathreshold stimuli was not signiﬁcant (Table II).
Also, when both cheeks were stimulated with either threshold or
suprathreshold stimuli, there were no differences in the number of
extinctions in each cheek (Table III).
In contrast to these observations, stimulating one body part with
a suprathreshold stimulus and the other at threshold resulted in a
signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the body part stimulated
at threshold. Thus the cheek was dominant over the hand, or the
hand was dominant over the cheek depending on the body part to
which the stronger stimulus was applied (Table II). Altering the
relative strength of the stimuli applied to the cheeks resulted in a
similar predictable change in the pattern of dominance (Table III).
Further analysis of the data in Table II indicates that the hand
B.

TABLE

II

Mean Extinctions of Cheek and Hand for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Mean
Extinctions Extinctions
of Hand
of Cheek
Hand and Cheek at
Threshold
Hand and Cheek at
Suprathreshold
Hand at Suprathreshold
and Cheek at Threshold
Cheek at Suprathreshold
and Hand at Threshold

Difference Signiﬁcance

1.55

1.56

.01

NS.

1.02

.59

.57

NS.

2.30

.22

2.08

p&lt;.01

.32

1.36

1.04

p&lt;.01

�KORIN—FINK

246

was dominant over the cheek with greater mean frequency (2.08)
than the cheek was dominant over the hand (1.04) for the thresholdsuprathreshold condition. This tendency is also evident when both

parts were simulated at suprathreshold. If it is considered that the
mean threshold for the hands is approximately 30 volts, while for
the cheeks the threshold is 7 volts, the difference in incidence of
extinction may be explained. Suprathreshold stimulation was set
at 10 per cent above the threshold value. The hand stimulus was
TABLE 111

Mean Extinctions of Both Cheeks for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Extinctions
of Left
Cheek

Mean
Extinctions
of Right
Cheek

Difference

Signiﬁcance

Threshold

.39

.45

.06

N.S.

Both Cheeks at
Suprathreshold
Right Cheek at

.18

.37

.19

NS.

.96

.14

.82

p&lt;.05

.03

1.28

1.25

p&lt;.01

Both Cheeks at

Suprathreshold and
Left Cheek at Threshold
Left Cheek at Suprathreshold and Right
Cheek at Threshold

therefore increased by 3 volts and the face stimulus by only 1 volt
above the threshold value. Such an increase, although proportionately equivalent, appears to have given greater relative strength to
the hand stimulus.

Extinction
Regardless of pattern, the mean total of the number of extinctions was greater when heterologous body parts were stimulated at
threshold than when these parts were stimulated with suprathreshold stimuli (Table IV). For these same conditions of stimulation the
dilferences between the mean number of extinctions obtained on
homologous stimulation of the cheeks lack statistical signiﬁcance,
but the results are in the direction which indicate that a greater
number of extinctions occur when two body parts are stimulated
at threshold (Table IV). The failure to obtain a signiﬁcant difference in the latter instance is partly due to the fact that relatively few
C. Incidence of

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
TABLE

247

IV

Mean of Combined Number of Extinctions For Varying Conditions
of Threshold and Suprathreshold“ Stimuli

Both Parts at Both Parts at A-Suprathreshold A-Threshold
Threshold Suprathreshold B-Threshold
B-Suprathreshold
A-Cheek

B-Hand

3.11

1.63

1.68

2.43

.85

.56

1.31

1.10

A-Left Cheek

B-Right Cheek
*

Differences between the mean number of extinctions at threshold and the
other three conditions of stimulation are signiﬁcant for the cheek and hand but
are insigniﬁcant for both cheeks.

extinctions are elicited when homologous parts are stimulated.
These ﬁndings on the total number of extinctions are in agreement
with previous observations (2).
DISCUSSION

The pattern of extinction followingelectrical stimulation of the
skin with threshold and suprathreshold stimuli has been determined.
In contrast to the ﬁndings of investigators (3) who used clinical
(tactile) stimulation, the face stimuli were not reported more frequently than the hand stimuli. Under the conditions of the method
of testing in this investigation, nevertheless, it is clear that the
pattern of extinction for any two body parts can be readily altered
by varying the relative strength of the stimuli. Thus a suprathreshold stimulus applied to the hand tends to obscure a threshold stimulus applied to the cheek and when these stimulus intensities are
reversed, the cheek tends to obscure the hand.
Theories which hold that dominance of the cheek over the hand,
in Simultaneous tactile testing, is due to an inherent factor, perceived body image, rostral dominance, developmental principle or a
learned factor, are not supported by these observations under our
conditions of testing. If any of these factors were involved, a pattern
of face dominance should have been elicited when the hand and
cheeks were stimulated with equivalent electrical stimuli at threshold and suprathreshold intensities, despite the methodological dif-

�248

KORIN—FINK

ference introduced by the procedure of afﬁxing electrodes to the
skin.
The ﬁndings in this study, namely that differences in the strength
of the simultaneous stimuli can alter the pattern of extinction, supin
differences
inference,
By
hypothesis.
stimulus-intensity
a
ports
threshold also play a signiﬁcant role.
That an intense stimulus elsewhere can raise the pain threshold
and
Wolf
demonstrated
been
has
by
Hardy,
35
much
cent
as
as
per
Goodell (13). This effect of a relatively intense stimulus on the
threshold of another stimulus has also been found by investigators
how
however,
still
remains,
The
stimuli
9).
problem
(8,
other
using
it is that a pattern of dominance may be elicited when presumably
stimuli.
touch
stimuli
by
are
applied
equivalent
The results of this study suggest an explanation. Stimuli of
for
sensation
threshold
elicit
a
to
intensities
are required
differing
various body parts. When these stimuli are increased 10 per cent,
the resultant stimuli are proportional and are perceived as equivastimuli
the
two
body
in
parts,
touching
clinically
lent. In contrast,
are disproportionate relative to the threshold value although apthe
of
Because
their
in
of
application.
intensity
equal
proximately
differences in threshold for the hand and cheek, the tactile stimulus
the
than
threshold
the
above
is
more
cheek
the
proportionately
to
stimulus to the hand. Thus the cheek is perceived more frequently
than the hand stimulus and has been considered “dominant.”
A threshold hypothesis was rejected (3) on the basis that the
thresholds obtained by von Frey (16) for pressure and pain do not
double
the
elicited
order
by
dominance
the
to
strictly correspond
simultaneous stimulation tests. Most difﬁcult to reconcile is von
which
the
of
threshold
penis,
glans
the
that
Frey’s ﬁnding
pressure
is second in dominance rank only to the cheek in a group of ten
the
while
millimeter;
111
is
tested,
grams per square
body parts
12
is
is
least
dominant,
only
which
at
the
grams
of
hand,
threshold
per square millimeter.
feand
male
for
the
in
area
thresholds
genital
Unfortunately,
thresholds
of
list
Von
determined.
Frey’s
been
seldom
have
male
(16) is based on a single subject. His more detailed observations (17),
however, indicate that there is virtually no pressure sense in the
and
warmth
of
the
pain,
perception
clitoris,
although
or
penis
glans
cold is well developed. It is quite possible that the punctate presthe
where
touch
with
genital area
correlate
does
threshold
not
sure
is concerned but that instead some other sense or combination of
senses is involved.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

249

Thresholds for the dorsum of the hand and the cheek obtained
by von Frey and other investigators indicate that the cheek is considerably more sensitive than the hand. These ﬁndings are in agreement with the thresholds obtained in this study. In a recent study
of electrical thresholds at various body sites Sigel (15) reported that
“leg areas including thigh and ankle, also dorsum of the hands and
the palm showed a deﬁnite tendency for higher thresholds. Scalp,
temple, forehead and face tended to have lower thresholds. The
anterior chest and upper arm and anterior wrist areas showed a
tendency for lower thresholds. Neck areas, abdomen and upper back
showed no deﬁnite trend.” In this statement there is no disagreement with the clinically observed order of dominance.
From the experimental results obtained here, it is proposed that
the dominance hierarchy elicited under the conditions of simultaneous testing may be explained on the basis of the relative strength
of the stimuli and the stimulus threshold.
SUMMARY

Using square wave electrical stimuli, the threshold for perception in the hands, cheeks and calves were determined in thirtyfour psychiatric patients. Simultaneous stimuli were applied in
random sequence to combinations of cheek and hand and both
cheeks, at threshold, suprathreshold and combinations of threshold
and suprathreshold intensities.
With simultaneous threshold, or simultaneous suprathreshold
stimulation, the differences between the number of extinctions in
either part were not signiﬁcant. With stimuli of unequal intensity
(one stimulus at threshold and one suprathreshold), however, there
was a signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the threshold
stimulus.
The total number of extinctions is greater with threshold than
with suprathreshold stimuli; and greater in heterologous than in
homologous patterns of stimulation.
It is concluded that the observed order of dominance in simultaneous cutaneous tests may be explained by psychophysical relationships.
REFERENCES
(1)

Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld,
1952.

(2)

111.:

Charles Thomas,

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M. 8c Green, M. A.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. é» Psychiat., 66:

855-362, 1951.

�KORIN—FINK

250
(3)

Bender, M. B.; Green, M. A. 8c Fink, M.: Patterns of Perceptual Organization
with Simultaneous Stimuli. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5" Psychiat., 72:233-255,
1954.

(4)

(5)

(5)
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)
(11)

Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of the Sensory Organization of the Human
Brain: A Study in Rostral Dominance as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation. 1. Nero. (5. Ment. Dis., 113:471-484, 1951.
Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the Human Brain:
II—A Study in Rostral Dominance in Children. Neurology, 1:119-122, 1951.
Critchley, M.: The Parietal Lobes. London: Edward Arnold 8c Co., 1953.
Critchley, M.: Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference
to Parietal Lesions. Brain, 72:538-561, 1949.
Denny-Brown, D.; Meyer, J. S. 8c Horenstein, S.: The Signiﬁcance of Perceptual Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion. Brain, 75:433-471, 1952.
Duncker, K.: Some Preliminary Experiments on the Mutual Inﬂuence of
Pains. Psychol. Forseh, 21:311-326, 1937.
Fink, M. Sc Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in
Normal Children. Neurology, 3:27-34, 1953.
Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8: Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile
Stimuli by Mentally Defective Subjects. ]. Nerv. 63'» Ment. Dis., 117:43-49,
1953.

(12) Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8: Bender, M. B.:

The Face-Hand Test

as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46—58, 1952.
(13) Hardy, J. D.; Wolf, H. S. 8: Goodell, H.: Studies on Pain. A New Method

for Measuring Pain Threshold: Observations on Spatial Summation of Pain.
1. Clin. Invest., 19:649-658, 1940.
(14) Linn, L.: Some Developmental Aspects of the Body Image. Int. ]. Psychoanal., 3621-7, 1955.
(15) Sigel, H.: Cutaneous Sensory Threshold Stimulation with High Frequency
Square-Wave Current: 11. The Relationship of Body Site and Skin Diseases
to the Sensory Threshold. ]. Invest. Derm., 18:447-451, 1952.
(15) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Physiologic des Schmerzsinns. Ber. Sdchs. Ges.
Wiss., 462185-196, 283-296, 1894.
(17) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Sinnesphysiologie der Haut. Ber. Siichs. Ges.
Wiss., 47:166-184, 1895.

�JOURNAL of the
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

VOL.

VI, No. 4

l

.

l

OCTOBER, 1957'

*
.

.

CONTENTS

Papers» from the Department of Experimental Psychiatry
A UNIFIED THEORY: OF THE ACTION‘OF- PHXSIODYNAMIC- THERAPIEs—‘——Max

Fink

-

’

A

19.7

AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION .IN‘ PSYCHIATRIC,

INmRyIEws—Jbseph Iaﬂe

207‘

SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN
TA—RY

MENTAL HOSPITAL—Robert

and Max Fink

L

Kahn, Max Pollack

SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN
TO ELECTRosHOC'x—Martin

A. Green

A VOLUN-

EEG

.216

RESPONSE

229

ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION 0F SIMULTAN'EOUS‘
ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS STIMULI—Hy‘mqn

Max Fink

Korzn and
"241

‘

NEWS AND NOTES

--

"I

'

'

I

" "

——

——-——————_—.
V

,

,

V

Published quarterly for the Hillside HOspit-al, Glen Oaks,- N. Y., by
7

‘

251

'

THESOCIETY 0F HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
Copyﬁght_1957, The Society

OE

Hillside HOSpital, Inc.

v”

"V

'

�Hillside Hospital is a nonsectarlan, nonproﬁt mental hospital
for the treatment Of voluntary patlents sufferlng from early and
curable mental illne-SS; regardless o'E the1r ability to pay. A special
department for adolescents1's 1ncluded:1n the Hospital program. The
Hospital teaches and trains" phys1c1ans ‘;in‘ psychiatry and psychotherapy, and also prOVidEs graduate training to graduate students1n
psychology, social service and psych1atr1c nursing. Research programs are in progress in psychiatry, med1c1ne and1n the laboratories.
The teaching and training program carefully organized and
integrated with the clinical serv1ces and 1nvolves the participation of
the administrative staff, a staif of superv1sors and the cooperation
of a large psychiatric attendmg staff almost entirely psychoanalyti—
cally trained. In addition to all the usual inpatient adjunctive
therapies, the Hospital condiu‘cts anact’e extramural program
including an aftercare clinic, an outpat1et1c11n1c afﬁliation with
Adelphi College for the tralnmg'of’ psychologists, nurses and social
workers, an organization of formerpatients; lectures to the general
public, and a close afﬁliation with the LongIsland Jewish Hospital.
The Hospital traces itsbegmmngsto orgamzatlonal meetings in
1917 held under the sponsorsh1p of Dr Israel Strauss which led to
the formation of the Committee for Menta 'iI-Iealth among Jews, in
11919. Hillside Hospital was opened anddedlcated in 1927. Its
original location was in Hastings-on-Hudson, mQVing' to its present
location in 1941. It is an aﬂiliate of Federatlon oﬁ Jewish Philanthropies of New York, and has been growmg stead1lyin bed capacity,
the present size being 200 beds.

is

"

'

�JOUBNAL of the
HILLSIDE HGSPITAL
Published as a function of the Publications Committee of the Medical Board.
The Hospital is an agency of The Federation of Jewish Philanthropies
of New York.

VOL.

VI, No. 4

OCTOBER, 1957

Editorial Advisory Board
MORRIS B. BENDER,

M.D.

DUDLEY

SANDOR LORAND,

D. SHOENFELD, M.D.

MD.

Editor
SIDNEY TARACHOW,

MD.

Associate Editors
M.D.
JOSEPH S. A. MILLER, M.D.
ABRAHAM S. LENZNER, M.D.

M. DAVID EPSTEIN, M.D.
SYLVAN KEISER, M.D.

EMANUEL KLEIN,

Distributed by
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street, New York 11, N. Y.

�Information to Contributors
Manuscripts—Original manuscripts should be sent to Sidney Tarachow, M.D.,
123 East 80 Street, New York 21, N. Y. All parts of the manuscripts should
be typewritten, double-spaced, on one side of bond paper. References
should conform to the style of this Journal.
Reprints—Orders for reprints should be addressed to International Universities
Press, 227 West 13 Street, New York 11, N. Y.

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION, $3.00, SINGLE ISSUES, $1.00

Editorial communications should be addressed to Sidney Tarachow, M.D., Editor, Journal of the Hillside HosPital, 123 East 80 Street, New York 21, N. Y.
Business communications, remittances, subscriptions and advertising material
should be addressed to the Administrator’s Ofﬁce, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, N. Y.

�EDITORIAL NOTE
The Editors are happy to devote this issue to the work of one
of the Hillside Hospital research departments, the Department of
Experimental Psychiatry. While from time to time the pages of this
Journal have carried reports of the various research activities within
the Hospital, this is the ﬁrst time that an entire issue of the Journal
has been given over to presenting a comprehensive picture of the
activities of a single department. Future issues will carry reports of
our other research activities, in different spheres and carried on with
varying methodologies. In our next issue we expect to present a
large report on the many activities of the in-Hospital and attending
staffs in professional and public education. We turn this issue over
to the Department of Experimental Psychiatry. It is a young department, its workers are searching for scientiﬁc measurable factors in
psychiatry, and hope by their ﬁndings to contribute to the multidisciplinary approach in psychiatry.

195

�PREFACE
The reports in this issue of the Journal are representative of
studies now in progress in the Department of Experimental Psychiatry. The Department was established in September 1954 upon
the initiative of the late Dr. Israel Strauss. The goal of its full-time
research personnel was deﬁned as the study of psychologic and
physiologic aspects of behavior. In establishing the operational,
experimental principles of the Service we have leaned heavily on
our previous experiences with Drs. M. B. Bender and E. A. Weinstein at the Bellevue and Mount Sinai Hospitals of New York.
These studies are supported ﬁnancially by the Board of Direc.
tors of the Society of the Hillside Hospital. In 1954 the United
States Public Health Service, National Institute of Mental Health
established their support of the program, which has continued.
Funds have also been obtained from the Dazian and Kaufmann
Foundations, and recently from the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry.
The Staff has shown rapid growth, and at the present time
includes:

Martin A. Green, M.D.
Joseph Jaf‘fe, M.D.
Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. '
Hyman Korin, Ph.D.
Max Pollack, Ph.D.

Assistant in Neurophysiology
Assistant in Psychiatry
Senior Assistant in Psychology
Assistant in Psychology
Senior Assistant in Psychology

——

—-

—
—
—

Technical assistants include Mrs. Hannah Mosquera (EEG), Mrs.
Jean Kolodny (Psycholinguistics) and Mrs. Janet Bowie (Secretary).
During the past year Dr. Harold Esecover, Senior Resident in Psychiatry, has been associated with the Department on a half-time
basis.

October

10, 1957

Max Fink, M.D., Director
Department of Experimental Psychiatry
196

�A UNIFIED THEORY OF THE ACTION OF

PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES1
MAX FINK,

MD.2

The proper role of the physiodynamic therapies (convulsive,

insulin coma and lobotomy) in psychiatry remains poorly deﬁned.
In part, this results from the lack of an adequate formulation of
their mode of action. In the past six years increasing evidence for a
neurophysiologic-adaptive View of electroconvulsive therapy has
been presented (41, 32, 38, 1). This view ascribes the therapeutic
process in electroshock to a persistent alteration in cerebral function
which provides the milieu for a change in adaptation of the subject
to his environment. The type of adaptation evoked is dependent
upon the personality of the subject, the environmental situation,
and the duration of the induced alteration in cerebral function.
Concurrently, an awareness of a similar mode of action in insulin
coma (31) and lobotomy (40) has developed.
During the past four years we have studied the relation between
alteration in various indices of brain function and the behavioral
response of psychiatric patients to therapy. The neurophysiologicadaptive view of electroshock has been supported and ampliﬁed (1 l,
12, 13, 19, 21); evidence for a similar view of insulin coma has been
presented (22); and recently the concept has been extended to the
newer “tranquilizers” (9). These studies provide the basis for a
generalization concerning the efﬁcacy of these therapies. It is our
purpose in this report to examine the experimental evidence to
determine whether or not the mode of action of each of these thera1From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

Read at the 2nd International Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, September

6, 1957.

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service; and the Board of Directors’
Research Fund of the Society of the Hillside Hospital.
2Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
197

�MAX FINK

198

pies may result from their ability to induce sustained alteration in
cerebral function; and the corollary question, whether measurable
alteration in cerebral function is a necessary condition for the efﬁ—
cacy of these therapies, or a “complication” or “untoward effect.”
The indices of brain function used in these studies have varied.
These include memory scales (26), visual (20) and tactile (10) perceptual tasks, and changes in language patterns of orientation both
clinically (19‘) and after intravenous amobarbital (21). In electroencephalographic studies of this problem, changes in the delta index,
both in routine records (11, 12) and after activation by intravenous
thiopentone (32, 33), and in the beta index (16) have been applied
successfully. For this review, two indices will be stressed: changes in
the delta index of the unactivated EEG, and clinical neurologic
signs. These indices have been selected because of their successful
application in the analysis of the electroshock process, and because
data is available for each of the therapeutic modalities.
OBSERVATIONS

(a) E lectrosh ock

The following notes summarize our experimental studies of the

role of changes in EEG delta activity in the response of subjects to
electroshock (11, 13). In these studies, electroencephalograms were
obtained before treatment, and at weekly intervals on a day after a
treatment in consecutive electroshock referrals. Grand mal treatments were administered three times a week, for twelve to twenty
treatments. The EEG records were quantitatively analyzed for the
amount of induced delta activity, and classiﬁed into categories of
“high,” “moderate” and “low” degrees of delta activity. At the end
of treatment, the patients were independently rated for their shortterm clinical response into the categories of “much improved,”
“moderately improved” and “unimproved.”
In the initial series of patients, a signiﬁcant relationship between
the early induction of high degrees of delta activity, and clinical
ratings of “much improved” was observed. Eighty per cent of the
records in the much improved group were high degree delta by the
fourth to sixth treatment; and the percentage was sustained at 90
per cent in the third and fourth weeks. In contrast, none of the unimproved patients developed high degree delta records in the ﬁrst
three weeks, and only 20 per cent of the records in the fourth week
were so classiﬁed.
In a subsequent predictive study, the EEG records during the

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

199

second and third weeks of treatment were analyzed. Of the patients
who had high degree delta records on both occasions, 67 per cent
were rated as much improved, while of the patients without such
records, 70 per cent were in the unimproved and moderately improved categories.
Roth (32, 38), studying the EEG delta activity evoked by intravenous thiopentone after electroshock, has related both the stability
and the rate of remission of patients with endogenous depressions
to the peak value of the induced slow activity. He concluded that
patients not attaining a speciﬁed delta activity level “have not acquired an adequate physiological basis for recovery,” and recommended measurement of delta activity levels after thiopentone as a
guide to the clinical management of patients.
Further information is obtained from convulsive-subconvulsive
control studies. While convulsive electroshock induces degrees of
delta activity that vary from low to high, subconvulsive therapy
rarely alters EEG patterns or induces low degrees of delta activity
(13). In their comparative study of different convulsive and subconvulsive techniques, Ulett, Smith and Gleser (38) demonstrated a
signiﬁcantly greater recovery rate for the convulsive than the subconvulsive group.
In a similar study (13) recently completed here, twenty-seven
patients received a course of subconvulsive therapy. Electroencephalograms, taken at weekly intervals, demonstrated minimal
changes—none of the records were scored as middle or high delta
activity. Of the twenty-seven patients, no change in behavior was
noted in twenty-three, and of these, nineteen were referred for a
second course of treatment. Grand mal electroshock induced a high
degree of delta activity in fourteen. All patients in this group
showed signiﬁcant changes in behavior, while of the ﬁve who did
not show the delta response, only two showed a behavioral change.
(b) Tranquilizing Drugs

When the newer drug therapies are studied from the viewpoint
of their electroencephalographic and clinical neurologic effects, a
meaningful classiﬁcation emerges. Furthermore, a relationship between the degree and type of induced change in cerebral function
and therapeutic efﬁcacy may be noted. The ability of these agents
to induce such signs of central nervous system dysfunction as motor
rigidity, depression, excitement and seizures are well known. Less
well documented, however, are the clearly deﬁnable electroencephalographic patterns. Based on observations made in chronic admin-

�200

MAX FINK

istration of drugs in adult psychiatric patients, the EEG changes
may be classiﬁed according to predominant changes in the frequency
spectrum. There are three broad types:
1. Increased slow wave activity with hypersynchrony
(“bursts”)——“delta shift”
11. Desynchronization with voltage and frequency
irregularity and irregular theta activity—“desynchronization”
III. Increased high voltage fast activity—“beta shift.”
Of the group of drugs inducing a delta shift, the phenothiazine
derivatives chlorpromazine, promazine, and perphenazine are clear
examples. Each drug induces seizures in nonepileptics or exaggerates
seizures in epileptic patients (7, 8, 15, 29, 37). Each drug induces
clinical parkinsonian neurologic patterns when given in adequate
dosage. In our laboratories, we have induced parkinsonism in all
patients receiving chlorpromazine (14) and have observed seizures
in 10 per cent of a group of psychotic patients without previous
history of seizures. Induced delta activity, including burst activity,
was observed in more than half the patients in this series.
Reserpine also evokes delta activity when given in large doses
(2). At high dosage levels, it exaggerates seizures in epileptics and
induces seizures in animals (35). At the usual clinical dosages, however, reserpine induces desynchronization of frequencies with a
moderate increase in theta activity (28), without seizure induction
but with deﬁnite motor rigidities. In a series of patients treated here
(39), parkinsonism was induced in all patients. EEG changes were
limited to desynchronization only, without delta burst activity.
The primary response of two other drugs, mepazine and benactyzine, is the induction of EEG desynchronization. Mepazine, a phenothiazine derivative, induces desynchronization with small amounts
of theta activity (7). Delta activity has not been described, nor have
we found reports either of seizures or parkinsonism in the clinical
literature. Benactyzine, a potent anticholinergic compound, induces
a blocking of alpha, ﬂattening of the record and occasional theta
activity (5, 17). Neither seizures nor parkinsonism have been described for this agent.
Meprobamate is the clearest example of the group of drugs inducing a beta shift in the EEG (3). This agent further differs from
the phenothiazines and reserpine in not producing parkinsonism
and not only are clinical seizures not induced, but deﬁnite antiepileptic activity has been described (30). Habituation is readily

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

201

achieved, and withdrawal phenomena of agitation and seizures have
been observed (42). In these actions, meprobamate is more like
barbiturates than like the other new tranquilizers.
If we determine the clinical efficacy of these agents, we note a
parallel between the induced EEG effects and their potency in
altering behavior. The drugs that most readily induce a delta shift
in EEG frequencies—the phenothiazine compounds—are those with
the greatest clinical efﬁcacy in the therapy of psychoses. The compounds with lesser activity in this direction are less efﬁcacious clinically.

Insulin Coma Therapy
The effects of insulin coma therapy on the nervous system are
well documented. During each coma, EEG delta activity is induced,
which usually persists for minutes to a few hours after gavage. Not
infrequently, in approximately one third of patients receiving deep
coma therapy in this hospital, seizures, aphasia or prolonged coma
results. After such events, EEG changes of delta activity persist for
days, and in cases of prolonged coma, for weeks and months (43).
The relation between prolonged coma, altered brain function
and behavioral response has been discussed at length. Revitch (31)
reported eight cases of prolonged coma and concluded that improvement may be attributed to the induction of organic brain damage,
similar to lobotomy. Yaeger, Simon, Margolis and Burch (43), describing twelve cases of prolonged insulin coma, noted a correlation
between length of coma, degree of organic confusion, remission of
mental symptoms and degree of EEG abnormality. Shagass and
Rowsell (34), emphasizing EEG data, and Kwalwasser and Caplan
(27) presented individual cases to support the same conclusion.
We reported a similar relationship between prolonged coma and
behavioral response in a case study (22). A 34—year-old schizophrenic
patient with paranoid ideation developed a left hemiplegia during
insulin coma therapy. With the onset of neurologic signs of hemiparesis, hemianopsia, hemisensory syndrome and spatial inattention,
there was a marked change in speech and behavior. He became lucid,
loquacious and denied his illness. His former paranoid-withdrawal
type pattern was replaced by a friendly cooperative attitude. These
changes were accompanied by delta changes in the EEG, as well as
language changes after amobarbital indicative of altered brain
function. The neurologic symptoms resolved, but the behavioral
changes persisted so that he was discharged two months later as
“much improved.”
(c)

�202

MAX FINK

(d) Lobotomy
While we have not had the opportunity to study lobotomy

patients from the point of view of this summary, the reports of
numerous observers clearly document a similar relationship. EEG
changes of delta activity are present in all subjects postoperatively
(6) and persist for varying periods. Walter et a1. (40) in a study of
150 patients, found an 80 per cent persistence of abnormal EEG
activity after three years. These authors also noted a relation between clinical improvement and the degree and extent of postoperative Slow wave activity.
Postoperative seizures are a frequent “complication,” being variously reported as occurring in up to 20 per cent of subjects (25).
Furthermore, there is a relationship between the extent of brain
tissue cut and the therapeutic outcome. Circumscribed surgical
lesions, regardless of locus, have an improvement rate lower than
unilateral lobectomy; and these latter are frequently inadequate
and are “improved” upon by a bilateral procedure (36).
DISCUSSION

When the various physiodynamic therapies are essayed from the
point of View of an alteration in brain function, a common mode
of action becomes apparent. These therapies represent devices which
induce appreciable changes in brain function, with resultant change
in behavior. Convulsive therapy and lobotomy induce measurable
diffuse changes in brain function directly; insulin coma primarily
when complications ensue; and the phenothiazine and reserpine
groups of tranquilizers when given in adequate dosage.
How persistent changes in cerebral function affect behavior is
not clear. Psychotic behavior is not “reversed” or “obliterated.”
Rather, with an alteration in the central nervous system milieu,
there is an alteration in all aspects of behavior including perception,
mood, affect, memory, judgment and attitude. The speciﬁc adaptive
is
and
is
each
for
variable
dependent on numerous
subject
response
historical and environmental factors. Premorbid personality (18),
environmental situation and expectations (13), and the duration of
the alteration in brain function (12) have recently been discussed as
determinants of the behavioral response under these conditions.
The induced changes in behavior are evaluated by the psychiatrist, administrator or family as to the degree of “improvement.”
These ratings are value judgments, based upon such factors as the
tolerance
environmental
the
behavioral
of
induced
response,
type

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

203

and the observer’s expectations. In this context, the physiodynamic
therapies do not induce “improvement”-—rather they induce behavioral change which is secondarily evaluated as improvement.
The alteration of cerebral function is therefore not a “complication” or an “untoward effect” but the desired goal of these forms of
therapy. Of the many “organic" therapies introduced during the
past thirty years, none apparently has been a speciﬁc agent for the
therapy of psychoses (in the sense that penicillin is speciﬁc for neurosyphilis and nicotinic acid for pellagra dementia), but rather devices
with greater or lesser degrees of applicability and efﬁcacy in altering
behavior by altering the cerebral milieu.
In this context, the various physiodynamic therapies are not spe—
ciﬁc for a type of psychosis. The early enthusiasm that reserpine or
chlorpromazine was speciﬁc for schizophrenia, or hypotheses that
ascribe signiﬁcance to an antagonism between these drugs and “psychosis” or “schizophrenia” are not tenable. Similar enthusiasm
claiming a speciﬁcity of insulin coma for schizophrenia is also untenable, and support for this view is presented in a recent chlorpromazine-insulin coma control study (14).
EEG analysis of these therapies permits a more explicit deﬁnition of the induced alteration in brain function. Changes in cerebral
function reﬂected by a shift in the spectrum of EEG frequencies
toward the slower range, with a concomitant increase in voltage and
a periodicity described as “bursts” or “hypersynchrony” provide the
change in milieu that is more effective in altering behavior. The
signiﬁcance of the delta shift has been clearly demonstrated in
electroshock therapy; and can be inferred from the available data
in lobotomy, insulin coma, and the tranquilizers.
That a delta shift has some speciﬁcity is seen in the analyses of
the drug effects. Those drugs that induce the delta shift—the phenothiazines and reserpine—have been consistently reported as effective
modiﬁers of psychotic behavior. Changes in brain function reﬂected
by EEG desynchronization only, or a shift in frequency spectrum to
the faster range, have a limited efficacy in altering psychotic behavior.3 The signiﬁcance of a delta shift is further seen in the
limited efficacy of subconvulsive electroshock when compared to
convulsive electroshock in the management of psychoses.
Another aspect of the alteration in brain function which may be
deﬁned is the change in seizure threshold. With the delta shift in
These observations suggest the application of EEG screening of new chemotherapeutic compounds for therapeutic efficacy according to their ability to
induce delta burst activity with a minimum of side effects.
3

�MAX FINK

204

the EEG, an increase in clinical seizures would be anticipated. This
is indeed true. Seizures have been described following electroshock
(4, 24); they are prominent after lobotomy (40) and a common “complication” during and occasionally following insulin coma therapy
(23). With the tranquilizers, the parallel of clinical efﬁcacy and
seizure induction is most striking. Phenothiazine compounds induce
seizures commonly; reserpine rarely; benactyzine not at all; and
meprobamate is a potent anticonvulsant! The lowering of seizure
threshold parallels the extent of the EEG delta shift induced by
these compounds. Similar analyses can be made for the potentiation
of sedative action and induction of parkinsonism—both potent indices of an alteration in cerebral function.
The neurologic basis for the delta shift and increase in seizure
frequency is unclear. Whether this represents a persistent change in
function of some speciﬁc brain stem nuclear system, as the centrencephalic, thalamic or hypothalamic, is conjectural. From the wide
range of agents that can induce a delta shift, with or without hypersynchrony, it appears more likely that the EEG changes reﬂect an
alteration in the diffuse biochemical activity of the nervous system
rather than in a focal activity of speciﬁc cellular masses.
SUMMARY

The neurophysiologic and clinical neurologic aspects of convulsive therapy, “tranquilizers,” insulin coma and lobotomy, are
1.

reviewed.

The efﬁcacy of each therapy in the treatment of psychoses is
related to the ability to induce a persistent change in cerebral function, of which a delta shift in the EEG spectrum and an increase in
2.

incidence of seizures are two indices.
3. Alteration in cerebral function is an essential prerequisite of
behavioral change with each of these therapies. Such alteration is
neither a “complication,” nor an “untoward effect,” but is the sine
qua non of the mode of action of these therapies.
4. No evidence has been educed in these studies that the physiodynamic therapies are speciﬁc agents for the relief of psychoses; nor
do they affect a speciﬁc segment of the nervous system; nor do they
induce speciﬁc behavioral changes.
5. The therapeutic process of convulsive therapy, insulin coma,
lobotomy and tranquilizers may be ascribed to the induction of a
persistent alteration in cerebral function which provides the milieu
for a change in adaptation of the subject to his environment.

'

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

205

REFERENCES

Aird, R. B.; Strait, L. A.; Pace, J. W.; Hernoff, M. K. 8c Bowditch, S. C.:
Neurophysiologic Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions. A.M.A. Arch.
Neural. (9 Psychiat., 75:371-378, 1956.
(2) Arellano, A. P. 8: Jeri, R.: The Effect of Reserpine on the Scalp and Basal
Electroencephalogram. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 8:150 (abst.), 1956.
(3) Berger, F. M.: The Chemistry and Mode of Action of Tranquilizing Drugs.
(1)

Arm. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 67:685-699, 1957.
(4) Blumenthal, I. J.: Spontaneous Seizures and Related Electroencephalographic
Findings Following Shock Therapy. J. Nerv. é» Ment. Dis., 122:581-588, 1955.
(5) Coady, A. 8: Jewesbury, E. C. 0.: A Clinical Trial of Benactyzine Hydrochloride (“Suavital”) as a Physical Relaxant. Brit. Med. J., Mar. 3, pp. 485487, 1956.
(5) Cohn, R.: EEG Study of Prefrontal Lobotomy. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat.,
53:351-357, 1945.
(7) Denber, H. C. B.: Discussion, Symposium on the Psychopharmacologic
Approach to Schizophrenia. Second Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, 1957.
(8) Fabisch, W.; Effect of Chlorpromazine on the Electroencephalogram of
Epileptic Patients. J. Neurol., Neurasurg., (5» Psychiat., 20:185-190, 1957.
(9) Fink, M.: Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration of Brain Function
in Behavior. Presented Second Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, 1957.
(10) Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8c Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
(11) Fink, M. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following Electroshock. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol, 8:158 (abst.), 1956.
(12) Fink, M. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
Response in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A. Arch. Neural.
(5» Psychiat., 78:516-525, 1957.
(13) Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L. 8: Green, M. A.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. J. Nerv. 6} Ment. Dis. (in press).
(14) Fink, M.; Shaw, R.; Gross, G. 8c Coleman, F. 8.: Comparative Study of
Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma in the Therapy of Psychosis. J. Am.
Med. Assoc. (in press).
(15) Hankoﬁ', L. D.; Kaye, E.; Engelhardt, D. M. 8c Freedman, N.: Convulsions
&lt;16)

Complicating Ataractic Therapy, Their Incidence and Theoretical Implications. N. Y. State J. Med., 57:2967-2972, 1957.
Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman, I. C. 8c Pincus, G.: Changes in
Electroencephalogram and in Excretion of 17-Ketosteroids Accompanying
Electro-shock Therapy of Agitated Depression. Psychosom. Med., 8:246-251,
1946.

(17) Jacobson, E.: Suavitil, et Nyt Stof Med Speciﬁk Virkning pa Centralnervesystemet. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 117:1147-1151, 1955.
(18) Kahn, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neural. (in press).
(19) Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Changes in Languages During Electroshock Therapy. In: Psychopathology of Communication. New York: Grune 8c Stratton,
(in press), 1957.
(20) Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Perception of Embedded Figures After Induced
Altered Brain Function. Am. Psychol., 12:361 (abst.), 1957.
(21) Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M. Sc Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test to
Clinical Improvement in Electroshock. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5- Psychiat.,
76:23-29, 1956.
(22) Kahn, R. L.; Graubert, D.

Fink, M.: Delusional Reduplication of Parts
of the Body After Insulin Coma Therapy. This Journal, 4 :134-148, 1955.
8:

�MAX FINK

206

(23) Kalinowsky, L. B. 8: Hoch, P.: Shock

Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other
Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry. New York: Grune 8c Stratton, 1952.
(24) Karliner, W.: Epileptic States Following Electroshock Therapy. This
Journal, 5:258-263, 1956.
(25) Klotz, M.: Incidence of Seizures, with EEG Findings, in Prefrontal Lobotomy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 65- Psychiat., 742144-148, 1955.
(26) Korin, H.; Fink, M. 8: Kwalwasser, S.: Relation of Changes in Memory and
Learning to Improvement in Electroshock. Conf. Neurol., 16:88-96, 1956.
(27) Kwalwasser, S. 8c Caplan, M.: A Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma: Treatment. This Journal, 1:145-155, 1952.
(28) Liberson, W. T.: Effect of “Tranquilizing” Drugs on EEG. EEG Clin.
Neurophysiol., 8:523, 1956.
(29) Liddell, D. W. 8c Retterstol, N.: The Occurrence of Epileptic Fits in Leucotomized Patients Receiving Chlorpromazine Therapy. J. Neurol., Neuro(30)
(31)
(32)

(33)

(34)

(35)

surg., (g. Psychiat., 20:105-107, 1957.
Perlstein, M. A.: Miltown, Its Use in Convulsive and Related Disorders.
]. Am. Med. Assoc., 161:1040, 1956.
Revitch, E.: Observations on Organic Brain Damage and Clinical Improvement Following Protracted Insulin Coma. Psychiat. Quart., 28:79-92, 1954.
Roth, M.: Changes in the EEG Under Barbiturate Anesthesia Produced by
Electro—Convulsive Treatment and Their Signiﬁcance for the Theory of
ECT Action. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 3:261-280, 1951.
Roth, M.; Kay, D. W. K.; Shaw, J. 8c Green, 1.: Prognosis and Pentothal
Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in Electro-Convulsive Treatment.
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:225-238, 1957.
Shagass, C. St Rowsell, P. W.: Serial Electroencephalographic and Clinical
Studies in a Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 65Psychiat., 72:705-711, 1954.
Sigg, E. B. 8c Schneider, J. A.: Mechanisms Involved in the Interaction of
Various Central Stimulants and Reserpine. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:

419-426, 1957.
(35) Simon, A.; Margolis, L. H.; Adams, J. E. 8c Bowman, K. M.: Unilateral and
Bilateral Lobotomy: A Controlled Evaluation. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (‘5'
Psychiat., 66:494-503, 1951.
(37) Stewart, L. F.: Chlorpromazine: Use to Activate Electroencephalographic
Seizure Patterns. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:427-440, 1957.
(38) Ulett, G. A.; Smith, K. 8c Gleser, G. C.: Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing a Control Group. Am. ]. Psychiat.,
112:795-802, 1956.
(39) Wachspress, M.: Blumberg, A. G.; Fink, M. 8: Miller, J. S. A.: Evaluation of
High—Dose Reserpine Therapy for Relief of Anxiety. This Journal, 5 :67-77,
1956.

(40) Walter, R. D.; Yaeger, C. L.; Margolis, L. H.

Simon, A.: The EEG Changes
in Unilateral and Bilateral Frontal Lobotomy. Am. J. Psychiat., 111:5908c

594, 1955.

(41) Weinstein, E. A. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Springﬁeld, Ill.: C. C. Thomas, 1955.
(42) Wikler, A.: Personal Communication.
(43) Yaeger, C. L.; Simon, A.; Margolis, L. H. 8: Burch, N. R.: Electroencephalographic Studies in Posthypoglycemic Coma. ]. New. 6’ Ment. Dis., 118:
435-441, 1953.

�AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION
IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS1
JOSEPH JAFFE,

The clinical interview

MD.2

is the psychiatrist’s

primary tool for
diagnosis of psychopathology, the modiﬁcation of behavior, and
collection of research data. Only in recent years, however, have
actual transactions which comprise the interview been studied

the
the
the
ob-

jectively.
Investigators of the interview have usually employed systems of
content analysis (1), which are based upon various theories of psychodynamics. Currently, there is increasing emphasis upon formal
aspects of interaction such as temporal patterns of speech (14),
drastic change of subject (3), physiological relationships of the participants (2), grammatical patterns of language (5, 6, 9), and speech
disturbances and silences (10). These aspects, in contrast to content
categories, are relatively independent of theoretical preconceptions,
and are more readily quantiﬁed and studied statistically.
In many investigations of these formal variables, however, the
patient’s communications are abstracted from the total context of
the interview. These approaches neglect the fact that the psychiatrist is a participant observer, i.e., a signiﬁcant variable in the interaction (ll). Others have attempted to control this variable by means
of structured interviews in which the doctor’s contribution is
standardized according to a predetermined experimental design (6,
7, 14). These structured situations delete the very quality of living
relationship that is the ultimate concern of the psychotherapist (7).
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

Read at the New York Divisional Meeting, A.P.A. November, 1957.
Supported by Grant 56-151 of the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry.
2Assistant in Psychiatry, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital.
207

�208

JOSEPH JAFFE

We are in need of methods of verbal interaction analysis that
neither preclude nor prescribe the doctor’s clinical responses.
The purpose of this paper is to present a method of interview
analysis which (a) is objective and quantitative, (b) preserves the
natural patient-therapist relationship, and (c) treats the interview
as an integrated system of interpersonal communication. This is accomplished by including the doctor’s usual clinical behavior in the
data to be studied. The raw material is not the patient’s speech, but
rather the total verbal output of the “two person” or “dyadic”
group (8).
METHOD

The tape-recorded interview

transcribed, without
regard to the speaker of the words. Careful attention is given to
subtle repetitions such as “I—I mean,” “Well as—as I say,” and to
(i
i,
such
“so
as “you know,”
to speak,
interpolated expressions
as I
said,” etc. These have a tendency not to be heard since they are
irrelevant to the content.
The transcript is then arbitrarily divided into consecutive units
of 100, 50 or 25 words, depending on the discreteness of the phenomena to be investigated. Thus a unit contains contributions of
words from either doctor or patient alone, or from both in varying
proportions.
The measurement applied to these units of dyadic speech is the
type-token-ratio (TTR). This is an index of the balance between
repetition and variety of words (12). The TTR is the ratio of the
number of diﬂerent words (types), to the total number of words
(tokens), in a sample of language. For example, in a lOO-word sample the repetition of the identical word 100 times in succession
would produce the lowest possible ratio of .01 (1 type/ 100 tokens).
The highest possible ratio of 1.0 would result if every one of the
100 successive words were different (100 types/ 100 tokens). These
extremes of stereotypy and diversity are rarely encountered, and
then only in grossly pathological situations (8).
The “word-type,” i.e., the numerator of the TTR, is arbitrarily
deﬁned. All words are different which are pronounced or spelled
differently. Thus, give, gives, gave, given and giving are considered different types, as are know and no. Vocalizations not
clearly identiﬁable as words are omitted, with the major exception
of “mmhmm” which is a frequent utterance of the interviewer in
our records. Contractions are retained as single words, but vulgarisms such as “I dunno” are edited to read “I don’t know.”
is precisely

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

209

The TTR

is calculated for each unit and the pattern of consecutive scores is graphically plotted, as illustrated in Figures 1 and
2. For additional precision, the units may be overlapped; e.g., 50word units may be advanced 25 words at a time, so that each unit
is composed of the last half of the preceding and the ﬁrst half of the

subsequent unit. This often smoothes the resultant curve. The overlapping technique is illustrated in Figure 3.
Previous studies of the TTR have dealt with the over-all average in a single person’s language (12). The present method studies
the sequential pattern in dyadic language.
OBSERVATIONS

In the last eighteen months approximately sixty recorded interviews have been investigated by this method. The material includes
forty patients in all diagnostic categories. The dyadic TTR patterns
have been found to be sensitive to a variety of clinical phenomena
(8). This report illustrates the changes in language interaction
occurring during the course of hospitalization and therapy, as well
as changes in rapport and defensive operations within individual
interviews.

TTR Pattern in Clinical Change
Figure 1 shows the pattern of the ﬁrst 1500 words of three separate interviews during the clinical course of one patient. The doctor
(a) Dyadic

DYADIC TTR PATTERN WITH CLINICAL CHANGE
(CONSECUTIVE

PRE-TREATMENT

T53
I.

25

WORD

UNITS)

POST-TREATMENT# I2

0N DISCHARGE

.92

.84
.76

M

M

.68

."-'

—

‘

.60

I

lo

20 30

40

UNIT NUMBER

5060

I

I0

20 30 40
UNIT NUMBER

FIGURE

1

5060

I

I0

20

30 4O 50 60

UNIT NUMBER

#40
#49
#59
I957

�210

JOSEPH JAFFE

in each. This case was selected as an unequivocal example of gross clinical change. In the ﬁrst interview the patient was
agitated and depressed. She refused to be seated and paced about
the room, reiterating stereotyped self-recriminations, crying hysterically, with marked pressure of speech. At the time of the second
interview, following a course of grand mal electroshock, the clinical
picture was grossly altered. She was less agitated and more cooperative, although withdrawn and complaining of a memory deﬁcit. On
discharge two months later, she appeared alert, poised, conversational and, at times, surprisingly insightful. She had been rated
is the same

clinically as “recovered.”
The TTR of consecutive 25-word units of interaction, for each
of the three periods described, is graphically represented in Figure 1.
Consecutive points are connected by lines so that the ﬂuctuations in
the graph reﬂect the difference between successive scores. The mean
TTR for the complete interview from which these samples were
taken is represented by a horizontal line through each graph. The
pattern of scores demonstrates a ﬂuctuating equilibrium about the
mean.
'
The interviews at these three successive stages show a sequence
of changes. The mean level of the interaction is seen to increase as
the clinical status changes from psychosis to “recovery.” There is a
concomitant restriction in the amplitude of the pattern, i.e., a decrease in variation about the mean.
Comment: The sequence of change in the TTR pattern parallels
the progressive improvement in interpersonal communication that
was apparent clinically. This suggests an approach to the quantiﬁcation of clinical change, deﬁned as an altered pattern of verbal interaction in the interview.
(b) Changes in Communication Within the Interview

Figure 2 is an enlargement of the ﬁrst of the three interactions
shown in Figure 1. Here the sequence of changes within a single
interview is examined rather than comparing the patterns of
successive interviews. As described before, the patient was speaking
continuously in a disorganized affective outburst. The lower line
indicates the 25-Word units in which the interviewer participated.
Following the doctor’s introductory remarks, units 3-12 represent
the patient’s uninterrupted speech. Wide oscillations of the pattern
are prominent. From samples 13 onwards the doctor made repeated
efforts to communicate with the patient. Two independent judges
reviewed the transcribed protocol, and both identiﬁed three areas

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

211

in which there seemed to be an understandable, rational interchange
between the participants. These periods are labeled “rapport” in
the upper line. During these three periods the oscillations of the
pattern are much constricted. Compare other nonrapport periods
such as 23-24 and 39—41, in which the doctor’s participation ampliﬁed the oscillations.
DYADIC TTR PATTERN
(CONSECUTIVE 25 WORD UNITS)

——

'RAPPORT"

TTR

36
DOCTOR'S
PARTICIPATION
l

5

l0

IS

3035 4045

20

25
UNIT NUMBER
FIGURE

2

50

#40
I957

Comment: This illustrates a method of quantifying interpersonal
phenomena, such as the degree of “contact” with a severely disturbed patient. The affective pattern in this patient represents the
psychotic integration, and for this reason, the occasional occurrences of conventional, rational conversation are described as periods of “rapport.” The restriction in the amplitude which characterizes these periods is similar to the over-all pattern at the time
of “recovery.”
Complete Interview
Figure 3 demonstrates the initial dyadic TTR analysis of a complete interview. This interview is the discharge evaluation of a
patient who had been hospitalized following a bizarre suicide at(c) Analysis of a

�JOSEPH JAFFE

212

tempt. After seven months of hospitalization, she had “improved”
clinically. This took the form of a hypomanic mood and a gross
denial of her severe emotional conﬂicts. The interview is scored by
the method of successive 50-word units advancing by 25-word steps.
The mean TTR for the interview is shown by the horizontal line
drawn through the graph. The pattern falls into several natural
segments. There are two areas in which ten consecutive points fall
below the mean (areas 4 and 7). These are unusual in this interDYADIC TTR ANALYSIS
TTR

OFA PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW

(OVERLAPPING so woao UNITS)

.98

.94
.90

:3:

::2 I.I—'i—'.I—'Ij==
.70

.r. III

-.

v.

255-

-/1-’1

I

II

~

JUL—I- ---.r

I

4I—I—I—I----I----—I——-—I-—I—|*I—---|—I—I
I

3

4

7

5

9

8

l0

II

I2

it 54

|957

FIGURE 3

There are also areas of gross deviation from the mean (such as
area 2). Thus we allow the objective pattern to determine our
criteria for phenomena to be studied. In general, we look for per-

View.

sistent changes in the TTR level, gross trends or sudden shifts.
Several of the deviant areas are described to illustrate the
method. The interview begins with a hypomanic monologue in
which the patient describes her successful visit home, her euphoric
outlook and plans for a rosy future.
Area 2 has been delineated because of gross deviation from the
mean. The beginning of this period coincides with a change of topic
to her plans for going back to her job two days hence. Her optimism is’interrupted by a period of confusion as she tries, with some
difﬁculty, to recall one of the details of the job. The end of the gross
ﬂuctuation coincides with the rationalization “I don’t think I’ll
have too much trouble.”
‘

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS
213
Area 4 was delineated as one of the two sections in which
ten
consecutive scores fall below the mean. Its beginning coincides
with
a statement about her depression on admission to the
hospital. This
area ends with the lowest score of the interview, which
precedes by
only a few words a spontaneous reference to her suicide
attempt.
This large deviation at the end of area 4 embodies the
main characteristics of the following area.
Area 5 is characterized by large ﬂuctuations above and below
the
mean. The content of this area is completely on the theme of suicide.
She attempts to prove how much she
now wants to live. The doctor’s
queries at the end of the period meet with increasing resistance. In
the beginning of the next segment (area 6) she
stubbornly refuses to
discuss the subject of suicide further, at which
point she changes the
subject abruptly.
Area 7 was delineated on the basis of two criteria. It
begins with
a precipitous drop in the TTR, followed by ten consecutive
scores
below the mean, and ends with an equally
abrupt rise. Its beginning
coincides with a change of subject by the doctor in the
form of a
question about her feelings at that moment in the interview. This
content area, i.e., the “you-me” relationship, is pursued
at a very
repetitive level. The period ends when she abruptly changes the

Area 9 is delineated because of an extremely low
score enclosed
by two large deviations. It coincides with a brief
mention of a
meeting with a young man who told her how well she looked. It
ends with an embarrassed r'emark and her
statement “I decided to
get him off the topic.”
These examples illustrate areas of disturbance or
disequilibrium
in the verbal interaction pattern. In
contrast, 3, 6, 8 and 10 are areas
of relative stability or equilibrium in the record.
These periods are
marked by a different quality of communication.
They consist either
of a euphoric, hypomanic monologue which avoids all
stressful subjects, or of evasion of the doctor’s probing questions by
superﬁcial
rationalization and conventional cliches.
Comment: Recent reports of objective interview studies
using
other techniques (10) have noted that the interaction
goes through
a series of deﬁnable phases, which may correspond to
periods of
stressful disorganization and successful defense
respectively. The
phases demonstrated here, and the events that delineate them,
suggest an analogous formulation. The content areas that disturbed the
pattern in this ﬁnal interview also did so on the initial interview
seven months earlier. We anticipate that the discussion of
a subject

�214

JOSEPH JAFFE

that had resulted in disequilibrium, but now no longer does so,
may constitute an operational deﬁnition of “resolution of an area
of conﬂict.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Diverse and highly personal interpretations of interview data
limit the growth of psychiatry as a science. Systematic study of the
actual transactions may lead to operational deﬁnitions of hitherto
subjective phenomena. For example, it is likely that the patterns of
verbal diversiﬁcation presented here constitute part of the subliminal cues to which therapists respond when making clinical judgments of anxiety, affect, etc.
Objective investigations of the interview must encompass the
behavior of both participants since the events observed are interpersonal processes. Gill, Newman and Redlich (4) deﬁne even the
initial interview as the “diagnostic evaluation of an interpersonal
relationship.” Ruesch (13) has recently stated that “observations
made in social situations do not have the characteristics of a scientiﬁc procedure in which one aspect is studied in detail while all
other variables are held constant.”
The method presented here is an attempt to convert these concepts into practical research methodology. It permits a quantitative
statement of various clinical phenomena occurring either within
single interviews or in the course of therapy. Disturbances of verbal
interaction are deﬁned operationally in terms of the conﬁguration
of the TTR pattern. Applications to the deﬁnition of clinical change
and transactions within the interview have been presented.
The TTR is only one of many quantiﬁable aspects of dyadic
speech. Pace of interaction, time reference, and relative amounts of
participation by doctor and patient are also being measured. Further
applications of these techniques are under investigation.
REFERENCES

(l) Auld, F. 8c Murray, E. J.: Content-Analysis Studies of Psychotherapy. Psychol.
Bull., 52:377-395, 1955.
(2) Coleman, R.; Greenblatt, M. 8: Solomon, H. C.: Physiological Evidence of
Rapport During Psychotherapeutic Interviews. Dis. New. System, 17:2-8,
1956.

H.; Hamburg, D. A.; Inwood, E. R.; Salzman, L.; Meyersburg,
H. A. 8c Goodrich, G.: A Procedure for the Systematic Analysis of Psychotherapeutic Interviews. Psychiatry, 17:337-345, 1954.
(4) Gill, M.; Newman, R. 8c Redlich, F. C.: The Initial Interview in Psychiatric
Practice. New York: International Universities Press, 1954.

(3)

Eldred,

S.

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS
(5)

215

Goldman-Eisler, F.: A Study of Individual Differences and of Interaction in
the Behavior of Some Aspects of Language in Interviews. ]. Ment. Sci.,

100:177-197, 1954.
(6) Gottschalk, L. A.; Gleser, G. C. 8c Hambidge, G.: Verbal Behavior Analysis.
A.M.A. Arch. Neural. 63'» Psychiat., 77:300-311, 1957.
(7) Grinker, R. R.; Sabshin, M.; Hamburg, D. A.; Board, F. A.; Basowitz, H.;
Korchin, S. J.; Persky, H. 8c Chevalier, J. A.; The Use of an AnxietyProducing Interview and Its Meaning to the Subject. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. (5*
Psychiat., 77:406-419, 1957.
(3) Jaffe, 1.: Language of the Dyad: A Method of Interaction Analysis in
(9)

(10)
(11)

(12)
(13)
(14)

Psychiatric Interviews. Psychiatry (in press).
Lorenz, M. 8c Cobb, 8.: Language Patterns in Psychotic and Psychoneurotic
Subjects. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5. Psychiat., 72:665-673, 1954.
Mahl, G. F.: Disturbances and Silences in the Patient’s Speech in Psychotherapy. ]. Abn. é» Soc. Psychol., 53:1-15, 1956.
Mandler, G. 8c Kaplan, W. K.: Subjective Evaluation and Re-enforcing
Effect of a Verbal Stimulus. Science, 124:582-583, 1956.
Mowrer, O. H.; Verbal Behavior in Psychotherapy. In: Psychotherapy:
Theory and Research, ed. 0. H. Mowrer. New York: Ronald Press, 1953.
Ruesch, 1.: Disturbed Communication. New York: W. W. Norton, 1957.
Saslow, G.; Matarozzo, J. D. 8: Guze, S. B.: The Stability of Interaction
Chronograph Patterns in Psychiatric Interviews. J. Consult. Psychol., 19:

417-430, 1955.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF
THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL
HOSPITAL1
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,2 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between
inci—
and
with
to
disorder
class
and
type
social
respect
psychiatric
dence of mental illness (3, 5, 6, 13, 14), selection and maintenance of
treatment (2, 6, 15), and therapeutic outcome (10). The present
in
of
selection
the
in
factors
social
therapy
is
with
concerned
study
a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich, and their coworkers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of New Haven was divided
into ﬁve social classes on the basis of weighted criteria of education,
under
who
residents
the
Of
were
residence.
of
and
place
occupation
freclasses
social
more
were
the
from
those
upper
psychiatric care,
quently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or
custodial care was more common among the lower classes. Of the
the
restricted
two
to
was
entirely
psychoanalysis
psychotherapies,
of
the
determinant
the
class
Social
was
predominant
upper groups.
held
conthe
when
was
diagnosis
selected
even
of
treatment
type
is
that
“.
found
it
follows:
results
.
.
as
their
summarize
stant. They
determedical
and
psychological
does
on
not
depend
treatment
well.
the
of
as
the
patient
status
but
position
minants alone,
on
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high
1

Glen
Hillside
Hospital,
of
Psychiatry,
Experimental
the
From
Department

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. S.
Public Health Service.
2Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital.
3Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
4Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
216

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

217

degree to the upper social levels. The data of this study would seem
to indicate that most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where
the background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist” (15).
It is possible to relate the results obtained from these community studies to such selective factors as the patient's ﬁnancial resources or the extent and type of treatment facilities available. A
more critical test of the importance of social factors affecting choice
of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients.
This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital. It is a nonproﬁt,
nonsectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental symptoms” (4), who are admitted regardless of their ability to pay. One of the main criteria for accepting patients is their ”ability to participate proﬁtably in psychotherapy.” Individual psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with organic therapies
available when needed. The average length of hospital stay is six
months, although some patients remain for as long as a year.
The present investigation is an outgrowth of several years of
study of electroshock therapy. In previous work it has been shown
that certain aspects of personality were signiﬁcantly related to patient selection and therapeutic efﬁcacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
electroshock patients differ from those receiving other forms of
treatment in regard to cultural background, including such factors
as education and place of birth, and personality as measured by the
California F scale (1); secondly, whether these factors were also
related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.
METHOD

Population: The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside
Hospital as of March 7, 1957 was studied. This constituted a total
of 172 patients, ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a mean of 34.6,
and including 58 men and 114 women.
Procedure: (1) The population was subdivided into three groups
according to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy,
(b) insulin coma therapy, and (c) psychotherapy only.5
5All patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data were included
in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

218

(2)

birth.

The groups were compared for age, education and place of

(3) All

patients were tested6 with a ten-item modiﬁcation of the
California F scale suggested by Levinson (9). The F scale is a questionnaire (see Appendix) which has been related to such factors as
authoritarianism, acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
The patient reads ten statements and indicates whether he agrees
or disagrees with each statement and to What extent. The score given
for each item ranges from one to seven and the total score range is
10 to 70. The greater the agreement the higher the score obtained.
The statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.
(4)

The population was subdivided in regard to utilization of

certain adjunctive services in the hospital. Among such services
available are group activities, occupational therapy, psychological
testing and creative therapy. The latter is a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a series of controlled painting procedures
which are considered to be analogies of life experience (18). Psycho—
logical testing and creative therapy were selected for this study because both require a speciﬁc referral from the therapist.
RESULTS

The data were analyzed as follows:

comparison of the treatment groups for age, education, F scale scores, and place of birth;
(2) comparison where diagnosis is held constant; (3) signiﬁcance of
length of hospitalization prior to treatment; and (4) comparison
between groups referred for adjunctive hospital services.
(1)

Comparison of Treatment Groups
For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard
deviations for the F scale scores, age and years of schooling are
presented in Table l. The EST group had higher F scores, was
older and had fewer years of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These diﬁerences were statistically
signiﬁcant for F score and age but failed to reach statistical signiﬁcance for education. The failure of years of education to differentiate the groups was due, in part, to the fact that the electroshock
1.

6As part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F
scale prior to treatment. In the case of‘ those patients who were actually on EST
on March 7 their pretreatment scores were used in the statistical comparison
since it had been found that EST signiﬁcantly affects the score during treatment.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

219

-

.550

ammvaom

§3«

50m

$.32

o

ammuuoh

mo

REE

55

:Eduamo

ﬁwmouom

onesm

.ummm.50m

$32

Aﬁoozw

ﬁvwwvm

£me

50m

-0332

«a

ﬁvgvmm

$592

ﬁaéww

:25

83m

mo

.Esnamo

8m:

35

-Gwmuuom

Son

$52

$55“

ﬁmwvvv

$392

$82

“Staggm

088

.vm

GMV

@8va

How

mo
.Ssﬂamo

658%
98on

H
53H.

h

mBOBm

J/

SK

$2; $5:

ﬁx:

l/i

If!!!

3320

6M

Gm

«0
28&gt; 582

EwEuuﬁh

3 3

g

NM

2: 2:

OS

"~on

.qu

:53

9:

«E

MN

S

2

:33.

1&amp;3

fill!!!

“59$th

Qm

q:

3

3;

n:

3w

mum

u

w?

um&lt;

x0

:82

Gav:

£5 .2:

3w

a

3%...“

3

:oﬂkﬁﬁcu

Gm

92

3;

2:

::.m

m2.

:32 E2

28m

h

582

3%

ﬁne:

2m

we”.

a5

3

3:

mm

mo.

8.

32
So.

3 a a
so:

8%

385:me

285:? 385:3

t

1

.onoxmmézsmcu

£35me

339%
@380

532:

-onuwmm

Saga

-935-.me

38%

3&amp;2:

1:.

�220

KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

group contained many foreign-born patients whose education was
difﬁcult to evaluate accurately. When treatment groups were subdivided into number of patients above and below eight years of
education, the difference was signiﬁcant at the .01 level. The insulin and psychotherapy groups did not differ statistically for any

of these factors.
Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign-born
patients than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group
being highest of all. Among the foreign-born patients, those who
came from Eastern European countries received somatic therapy
predominantly, while the majority of those from Western Europe
received psychotherapy alone.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis
The diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are com—
parable to those reported in previous studies of the hospital popution (12). Of the 172 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as
psychotic depression, 32 as psychoneurosis and 2 with other diagnoses. As expected, a larger proportion of the depressed patients
(52%) received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.
To control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the
psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those who received electroshock and those who were given psychotherapy alone.
The results are shown in Table 2.
While the two groups were comparable for age and education,
the electroshock patients had a much higher mean F score, a difference signiﬁcant at the .02 level of conﬁdence. It is also demonstrated
that a signiﬁcantly higher proportion of the electroshock patients
were born in Eastern Europe.
2.

Comparison of Electroshock Patients According to Length of
Hospitalization Prior to Treatment
While the electroshock patients, as a group, have been shown to
differ from those receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there were still
considerable intragroup differences. To account for some of these
differences it was postulated that the same factors involved in selection of treatment were also related to the readiness with which a
given patient was referred for electroshock. While most of the patients who received EST were placed on treatment less than three
months after admission, about 40 per cent were referred after a
period of three to twelve months. In Table 3 the patients are compared according to the period of hospitalization prior to electro3.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.830

ax”:

$.va

vacuum

133$

$2;

ﬁhm

“225355

«0

583m

ainamo

83m

«so
.033

50m

$32

@5th

$.ng

@8va

Z

”REE

208

23$th

a;

how

«0
comumuswm

Envy.
Mano

Sign“

waoﬁum

N

ﬁg;

@E:

23

.vm

HEM—NH

=32»:qu

Qm

3

can:

3:

mo
$3on

3
2:

GNU:

a

$5

a5

86

a

mg

umucxuaﬁm

Gm

mi

«NH

3.2;

vm&lt;
582

3:“

Gm

32

3*

Que:

mg

£5

ﬁtubum

kc

a

ﬂ:

*Nwm

88m

goutumwﬁcu

h

532

3*

non

5N0:

Em:

a5

8d
me.

a

as
3%

285:?

-oﬁwmmémm

-oauwmm

322:

382:

Ha
a.

221

�KAHN—POLLACK——FINK

222

ﬁé

.850

N

a

o
.83

5.85

$me
mo

583m

@888

uneasm

8

8me

H

o

m

«Eu

EuEEush

-0332

3

58m

$88 $85

$8:

2 5

2

ﬁg

$89

$83

mm

a

:

BER

988

How

we
tetanacﬁﬁwem

8.8
H

8098sz

any?

«Eu

183
wBBom

x0

$2:

a

m

m
SMEVN

6mm

559

3

Qm

E

:82

3

«o
928%

3

ca

5.:

8.8

8

88

:2

8.8

:82 .85

cm:

Sn

a;

fill!!!

Mﬁﬁkouuvx

Gm

8.2

25.36%

98

8.2

a

:4

:88

gm

:82 .85

83.

$4:

8...:

a

8.8

:8.“

:2

%&lt;
8.8

582

8%

:3

Ram

88
Qm

Q:

w:

mm;

38m

:oﬂtiﬁcu

BE :52

:8

rm :32

Sim
-mNzﬂmmmom

“cued—88H.

622.:

aa

dawned

.88

:05

8.8

a;

9

mo

E«

$va

.88

m m

.85

$8
288

EMS“

2c

m
52:

o

3

:82

88
who:

8

$04

a;

2.2

8

288

.88

8

8

m

8. S.
8.

m
52:

80A

.89:

5::

988

885.85 88:88.,”

Gmﬂu

.888

c
8

m

UHOE

.888
a.“

I

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

223

shock. Patients who had higher F scores and
were older were treated
earlier than the younger and lower F scale
groups. Place of birth is
also a signiﬁcant factor. While 44
per cent of those treated within
three months were foreign-born, all patients referred after
a period
of six months were born in the U. S. The data
on education just
fails of signiﬁcance, although 28
per cent of those treated earlier
had less than eight years of education.
4. Use of Adjunctz've

Hospital Sewices
Comparison of the patients referred for creative therapy and
psychological testing is shown in Table 4. It is clear that those referred for either of these procedures had signiﬁcantly lower F
scores,
were younger in age, had more education and more were nativeborn than patients who were not referred for these services.
DISCUSSION

The results indicate that the factors of education, age,
place of
birth, and F scale score were signiﬁcantly related to the
type of
therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive services in this
hospital. Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for those
patients who were younger, better educated, native-born and had
lower
F scores. Such patients were also referred
more frequently for the
auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores, were
older, poorly educated and foreign-born, particularly in Eastern
Europe, were most likely to be referred for EST. These
patients
were infrequently referred for psychological tests or for creative
therapy. Furthermore, these relationships were still signiﬁcant when
diagnosis was held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of
Hollingshead,
Redlich, and their co-workers (3, 5, 6, l3, 15) who demonstrated that
social factors are related to the type of
therapy received in a community. The present study demonstrates that such factors are also
signiﬁcant in a hospital setting where ability to
pay is not a criterion
of therapeutic selection and where all forms of
therapy are equally
available to the entire population.
With ﬁnancial aspects and the availability of therapeutic facilities eliminated in accounting for the relation of social
factors to the
selection of treatment, two alternative interpretations
be conmay
sidered. The social factors may relate directly to the
empirically
established criteria for choice of therapy. On this basis
a patient is

�KAHN—POLLACK—FIN K

224

550

.35an

«REE

$5;

$5.:

@2va

$5:

153$

$3:

Axwwvwa

$.8va

@583

$.me

@me

$3

5me

«0

532%.“

vacasm

ﬁw:

ﬁvﬁvmw

H

awwuamu

«Eu

82m
323.5

-0332

3:3

1E3

Eom

a
wumtuh
EOE

$38

kg

How

«0

N

£038st

*Nmenamo

man“;

~e£m£o£uaam

«Eu

.
33:5

ARR“:

waoﬁum

ﬁéw

ﬁévﬁ

u8
w.
8.9.5wa

it’ll;

.wm

539

if}

3.

m.»

Qm

a.»

a

8N

***h.w

mm:

mo
28&gt;

2:

3:

:82

wﬁ

w:

:82

a5

A:

AWN

233::va

.8“
Qm

2:

3:

«.2

:82

EN

3m

Sun

«.2

a

mg

:52 .Em

***©N.m

fwawowé

om&lt;
wmtukum

0.“.

ﬁoa

Scwtek
it$©m6

Gm

kc

2:

QB

inomﬁ

H

as 2:

:32 :32

28m

h

:82

982

3w

5.3

soy

32V

3.»

iv

55

m.w

mg:

A5

s.

so.

a a a

23.23%:80

O&gt;UNQHU

mo.

:52

Esme? 385:?

$3389

385:?

Aonuwmm

3:80

.rH.U
03330

322?

3225

Oz

Jonowmm

.Hoaowmm

and.

oz

-Hd

OZ

*
oZ

i

I;

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

225

referred for electroshock because he is older,
poorly educated or
foreign-born, clinical experience having shown that such
persons
respond best to this type of treatment. This explanation is inadequate since half the patients with psychotic depression received
psychotherapy alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice for this illness.
An alternative interpretation is that social factors
are related to
choice of treatment because they also affect certain
psychological
patterns of behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy,
such as mode of communication. Thus, a
patient is not referred for
electroshock because he is foreign-born or
poorly educated, but
rather these factors provide the difference in cultural
background
between patient and therapist which makes successful
communication less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Robinson
et al.
(15), in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have
pointed out that
psychotherapy is most likely to take place where the cultural background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist. Conversely,
patient-therapist differences in systems of value and communication
may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. In the
present study, similarly, the patients who received psychotherapy
alone were more like the therapists with
regard to the factors
studied.7
Apart from the problem of patient-therapist differences, certain
patterns of communication exhibited by the patient may be intrinsically incompatible with the establishment of conventional
psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have shown that
verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy and use of cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8). Such
language patterns appear to be more frequent in
persons with
poorer sociocultural backgrounds.
Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect
on com—
munication patterns, may also determine the manifest
symptomatology. Opler (11) has noted that, among patients diagnosed
as
schizophrenic, differences in symptoms are related to differences in
cultural background. Frank et al. (2), studying psychoneurotic
patients, reported that patients whose symptoms were
expressed in
somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while
those
who remained had ideational symptoms. In a
study of personality
The

therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9. Sixteen
per cent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education was
7

20.

18

over

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

226

factors in electroshock patients (8) we have noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and communication were more likely to be
associated with the development of a depressive psychosis. The relationship between communication pattern and symptoms indicates
that symptoms themselves are a mode of communication.
The F scale furnishes a quantiﬁable index of attitude and communication patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a
mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers
were less receptive to entering a psychotherapeutic relationship and
were more likely to receive electroshock. Tougas (17), using an
ethnocentric scale similar to the F scale, found that psychotherapy
was more effective in patients with low scores. In the present study
the F scale was the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment groups.
These results have clinical as well as theoretical signiﬁcance.
lowthat
indicate
in
from
observations
study
a
progress
Preliminary
scorers on the F scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that
those with high F scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone.
Another clinical application may be in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient. This may be done by
minimizing their social differences, by matching them more closely
for age and place of birth. Of possible greater importance is the
necessity for developing new modes of communication when treating
conventional
psychotherapeutic apwho
to
refractory
are
patients
proaches.
While epidemiological studies have clearly structured some of the
indicated
have
and
of
selection
in
involved
treatment,
problems
the direction of further study, it still remains for more processoriented research to provide deﬁnitive answers.
/

SUMMARY

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which all forms of
and
of
birth,
education,
place
available,
age,
were
equally
therapy
score on the California F scale were signiﬁcantly related to the type
of therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive hospital
1.

services.

Patients who were older, poorly educated, had higher F scores
and were foreign-born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most
likely to be referred for electroshock. Psychotherapy was the treat2.

�held constant.
4. Among the electroshock
patients the same factors found to be
signiﬁcant in choice of therapy were also
related to the readiness
with which a patient was referred for
electroshock.
5. It is postulated that
treatment selection is the result of the
communicative interaction between patient and
therapist.
Social
factors may be important in so far
as they are related to different
modes of communication.
APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM
Below are a number of statements. For
each statement we want
you to give us your personal opinion of whether
disyou
or
agree
agree. Answer each statement accordi
ng to one of the following:
I AGREE A LITTLE
I DISAGREE A LITTLE
I AGREE PRETTY MUCH I DISAGREE
PRETTY
MUCH
I AGREE VERY MUCH
I DISAGREE VERY MUCH
I. No sane, normal, decent
close friend or relation.
2. Science has its place, but
there are many important
things
that must always be beyond human
understanding.
3. If people would talk less
and wor k more, everybody would be

better off.

pe and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals
ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.
8. The best teacher or boss is
the one wh 0 tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to
go about it.
9. Young people sometimes
up they ought to get over them and settle down

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

228

weak
the
classes:
distinct
into
divided
two
be
10. People can
and the strong.
REFERENCES
8c Sanford, R. N.:
D.
Levinson,
J.
E.;
Frenkel-Brunswik,
(1) Adorno, T. W.;
8: Brothers, 1950.
York:
New
Harper
The Authoritarian Personality.
St: Stone, A. R.:
E.
H.
S.
Nash,
D.;
L.
Imber,
H.;
(2) Frank, J. D.; Gliedman,
(33»
77:
Neurol.
Arch.
Psychiat.,
A.M.A.
Leave
Psychotherapy.
Why Patients

283-299, 1957.
(3) Freedman, L. Z.

8c

Hollingshead, A. B.: Neurosis and Social Class. Am. ].

Psychiat, [13:769-775,

(4)
(5)

(5)

(7)

(8)
(9)
(10)

(11)
(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)
(16)
(17)

(18)

1957.

Hillside Hospital: 29th Annual Report, 1956.
8c Redlich, F. C.: Schizophrenia and Social Structure.
A.
B.
Hollingshead,
Am. ]. Psychiat., 110:695-701, 1954.
Disorders.
Class
and
Social
Psychiatric
8:
C.:
F.
A.
B.
Redlich,
Hollingshead,
Disand
Psychiatric
Environment
Social
the
Between
In: Interrelations
orders. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, pp. 195-208, 1954.
Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
8c J. Zubin. New York:
P.
Hoch
ed.
Communication,
In: Psychopathology of
Grune 8c Stratton, 1957.
to
Behavioral
in
8c
Response
Factors
M.:
Personality
L.
Fink,
R.
Kahn,
Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neurol. (in press).
Levinson, D. J.: Personal Communication.
8c Johnson, N. A.: Failures in Psychiatry: The Chronic HosC.
N.
Morgan,
1957.
113:824-830,
Am.
Patient.
].
Psychiat,
pital
197:103—110,
American,
Scientiﬁc
Culture.
and
K.:
M.
Schizophrenia
Opler,
1957.

8: Rachlin, L.:
A.
Lurie,
M.;
Gurvitz,
G.
S.;
Goldman,
Rachlin, H. L.;
1950.
in
Hillside
from
Hospital
317
Patients
Discharged
of
Follow-up Study
This Journal, 5:17-40, 1956.
Redlich, F. C.; Hollingshead, A. B.; Roberts, B. H.; Robinson, H. A.;
Disorders.
and
8:
Social
K.:
Structure
Psychiatric
Z.
L.
J.
Meyers,
Freedman,
Am. J. Psychiat., 109:729-734, 1953.
Rennie, T. A. C.; Srole, L.; Opler, M. K. 8: Langner, T. 8.: Urban Life and
Mental Health. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:831-837, 1957.
Robinson, H. A.; Redlich, F. C. 8c Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Treatment. Am. ]. Orthopsychiat., 242307-316, 1954.
Titus, H. E. 8: Hollander, E. P.: The California F Scale in Psychological
Research: 1950-1955. Psychol. Bull., 54:47-64, 1957.
In:
Verbal
in
Factor
Therapy.
Ethnocentrism
as
Limiting
a
R.:
R.
Tougas,
8c R. F. Dymond.
C.
ed.
R.
Rogers
and
Change,
Personality
Psychotherapy
1954.
196-214,
Press,
of
Chicago
pp.
University
Chicago:
Creative
of
Utilization
8c
and
E.:
Therapeutic
Structure
E.
Zierer,
Zierer,
Activity. Am. ]. Psychother., 10:481-519, 1956.

�SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY
IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK1
MARTIN A. GREEN,

MD.2

The assumption is often tacitly made in studies of nervous system function that the capacity for neurophysiological change is
similar for animals or humans in the groups under study. Differ-

ences in response are ascribed to different parameters of the stimulus
or to differences in the location and extent of lesions, either spontaneous or experimentally produced. Such an assumption may not
be warranted, however. Perhaps another factor in the variability of
response under these conditions is an individual variability in
neurophysiological reactivity or responsiveness. The initial “base
line” may not be similar in all individuals.
The possibility of different inherent patterns of reactivity has
been suggested by the studies of the alterations in the EEG during
electroshock. We have been impressed by the high degree of variability in such alterations both in their quantitative and qualitative
aspects. Although this variability has been described by previous
investigators, it has not been stressed sufﬁciently; nor have possible
explanations been advanced or systematically investigated.
The present report concerns a description of the changes in the

EEG during electroshock in the Hillside Hospital material. The
concept of neurophysiological reactivity is presented and studies
that may clarify this problem are suggested.
MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients who received electroshock for psychiatric
illness were studied. The patients were voluntary admissions to
1From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

2Assistant in Neurophysiology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
229

�230

MARTIN A. GREEN

Hillside Hospital and the majority had not received electroshock
previously. The diagnostic groups included psychotic depression,
manic-depressive psychosis and schizophrenia. The largest group
was patients with depression. Ages ranged from 20 to 68 years with
a median of 47 years.
Treatments were given three times weekly, each patient receiving at least twelve treatments. The Medcraft instrument (alternating current) was used for twenty-eight patients and the Reiter instrument (unidirectional current) for sixty-one patients. Electro—
encephalograms were taken prior to, at weekly intervals during, and
two weeks following the course of treatment. Patients Whose pretreatment EEG was abnormal were speciﬁcally excluded from study.
Tracings were done on a nontreatment day (from 24 to 36 hours
following the previous treatment) with an eight channel Medcraft
machine using needle electrodes. Frontal, motor, parietal, occipital,
anterior temporal, posterior temporal, vertex and earlobe placements were employed with scalp to scalp and scalp to earlobe
combinations.
RESULTS

Delta Activity
A. Quantitative Diﬁerences: The delta activity was analyzed according to the method described by Fink and Kahn (7). The duration of burst activity, the lowest frequency, the average delta index
in several leads, the highest amplitude, and the highest per cent
time delta in one lead were measured. Records were classiﬁed as
showing a low, middle or high degree of delta activity (Fig. 1) according to criteria previously described (7).
All patients developed delta activity during the course of twelve
treatments, but differences in the amount of the slow activity and
its rate of development were very apparent (Table I). Some patients
developed “high delta activity” early in treatment, whereas other
patients showed only “low” or “middle” changes even after twelve
treatments. These latter patients were followed further with serial
EEGs. As treatment was continued, a high degree of delta activity
did not develop in some of these patients until twenty or more
treatments, or until treatments were given on a daily basis. They
were resistant to neurophysiologic change. This individual variability in EEG response was independent of the type of electroshock
current employed, being present both with alternating and with
unidirectional current applications.
1.

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

231

WWW
WWW
WWW’VW’WW
WWW
WWW
WWW
"WWW WWW-«MW
WWW
WWW
LF-LO

RF-RO

.,,

LC-LMT
RC-RMT

RP-E

LAT-LPT

WWWWWWWVW

”W
ISECOND

RAT-RPT

PRE- ELECTROSHOCK

FIGURE

la

24 HOURS AFTER EST

150 W

4%:

l2

Degree of Delta Activity—Low
From Fink and Kahn (7)

Qualitative Diﬂerences: Although the total amount of delta
activity may be similar, records differ as to type, frequency and
voltage of delta activity. One prominent qualitative difference is the
ratio of irregular delta activity to bursts of slow activity. Nearly all
B.

W
WW

LF‘ LO

WWWMWMWW

LC-LMT

R C -R MT

L

P-E

RmANWMMW-E
LAT- LPT

'

WNW/“WWW

WWW/MW
Ison

"WWW
WWW

WWIMMMMMMWNVWMMWWMMMMMHM

£59932.

RAT-RPT

PRE-ELECTROSHOCK

FIGURE 1b

24 HOURS AFTER EST #10

Degree of Delta Activity—Middle
From Fink and Kuhn (7)

�MARTIN A. GREEN

W
W
W mm
232

LWW WWW
«WWW
- L MT

T

ELEM“ Mwmwwaw

MR

LP'E

RP-E

”WWW

“H”

WWW

lSECOND

RAT- RPT'

PRE-ELECTROSHOCK

24

FIGURE 1c

{5,on

HOURS AFTER EST =11:”

Degree of Delta Activity—High
From Fink and Kuhn (7)

records show burst activity during a course of twelve treatments. In
some patients the initial delta change is in the form of bursts
which become more frequent, slower and of higher voltage as treatments are continued. The irregular delta activity in such records is
much less prominent and usually occurs at faster frequencies. In
other patients the reverse occurs. Delta activity appears chieﬂy in an
irregular and scattered form. Although burst activity is also present,
it is not conspicuous. In a third group of patients the amounts of
irregular delta activity and bursts are approximately equal (Fig. 2).
These differences in the form that the delta activity assumes
are usually constant during the course of treatment. At times,
TABLE

I

Degree of Delta Activity in Serial Electroencephalograms
during Electroshock
(2-4 records were taken for each patient)

No. of Records in Each Treatment Period
EEG Activity
No change
Low delta activity
Middle delta activity
High delta activity

EST 1-3

4-6

7-9

10-12

5

l

1

37

0

21

7

20
28

22
45

10
25

16
3
1

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

233

however, burst activity will become more prominent than the
irregular delta only during the latter part of the course of treatment; or burst activity which appears prominent early in treatment
may be overshadowed and obscured in later records by a large
amount of continuous irregular delta activity.

WWWW
A

HH

I486

WWW
AT‘VERTEX

R

5

HH

F-VERTEX

1392

WWWNWWVWWW
R

WWWWWWWWW
‘3

HH

l599

AWWWWWWWMMMMWNWWW
D

HH

50

mv.

I572

|____
SEC.
l

FIGURE 2

Qualitative Changes in Delta Activity
A—Irregular Delta
C—Rhythmic Runs
B—Delta Bursts

D—Asymmetry

The slow activity is maximal at the anterior temporal and
frontal electrodes and less pronounced at the more posterior electrodes. Often it is asymmetric, being of higher voltage, slower, and
in greater amounts at the left anterior temporal and frontal
electrodes as compared to the right (Fig. 2). Only
rarely is the
reverse true, i.e., accentuation on the right side. This
asymmetry
occurs during treatment both with alternating and with unidirectional currents.
Another type of abnormality is the appearance of rhythmic
runs
of delta activity which may continue for 10 to 20 seconds
(Fig. 2).

�MARTIN A. GREEN

234

The regularity of the frequency and voltage of the slow waves in
these runs is very striking. These runs are usually infrequent, but
may be the most prominent alteration in the record.
In many records the amount of delta activity ﬂuctuates during
the tracing. At times, some portions of a record may appear nearly
normal, while in other parts of the same record the delta activity
may be quite pronounced. This variation is independent of the
electrode combinations employed.

or Spike-Wave Activity
A large number of records show single spike activity of low,
moderate or high voltage. Most often such spikes are slower and
not as prominent as those present in patients with seizure disorders.
A small number of records show spike—wave activity. This is usually
at irregular, mixed frequencies and, again, does not resemble the
regular rhythmic bursts commonly seen in patients with seizure
disorders (Fig. 3).
2. Spike

3. A lpha

Activity
The alpha activity shows changes both in amount and frequency.
As the amount of delta activity increases the amount of alpha activity usually decreases. Changes in frequency occur but are not proHH

A
F

I40!

a

~wvv~uu~vv*1qJJWV’V‘r
0

W

“H

3‘

WWW

AT-VERTEX

TO EARLOBES

AT

VERTEX

'5“

P-EARLOB

”PT
50

mv.|
I

SEC.

FIGURE 3

Spike and Spike-wave Activity

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

235

nounced. The frequency will be slowed by 1-2
cps but at times will
remain the same as in the preelectroshock
tracing. In a small number of patients the amount and voltage of
alpha activity increases
during treatment. This change persists during the
posttreatment
period after the slow-wave activity subsides (Fig. 4).
F-O

HHI484

L
R

WW
PRE-EST

HH

|597

WWW’WWWWWMMWWWWMAMWMWW
L
F-O
2

wxs. POST-EST
FIGURE 4

50

mv.|_
l

SEC.

Change in Alpha Activity

Beta Activity
The fact that many sedatives, particularly
barbiturates,
induce
fast activity in the EEG and the
difﬁculty in controlling the administration of these drugs in the population studied
makes it difﬁcult
to evaluate changes during the course of
treatment. In most instances changes in fast activity are minimal.
The most frequent
change, when present, is a decrease in the activity.
4.

DISCUSSION

The problem being raised is that of the individual
variability
in the type and degree of EEG alteration
during electroshock

therapy. AS described, this is manifested in: (1) the
amount of slowwave activity and its rate of development; (2)
qualitative
differences
in the slow-wave activity (amount of burst
activity vs. irregular
delta activity, symmetry, ﬂuctuating
appearance of slow activity,
runs of rhythmic Slow activity); (3) presence of Spike
or spike-wave
activity; and (4) changes in alpha and beta activity.
Previous investigations (2, 4, 5, 10, ll, l2, l4, 17,
18, 19, 20, 25)
have stressed possible correlations with
age, sex, frequency of treatment, type of current employed, psychiatric diagnosis,
and clinical

�236

MARTIN A. GREEN

change. Increasing the frequency of treatment, for example, will
increase the degree of alteration in the EEG. However, when patients of similar sex, age and psychiatric diagnosis are given treatments at the same frequency with the same type of electroshock
current, variability in the rate of development of changes in the
EEG and their type and degree are still very prominent.
One explanation for this variability might be the distribution
of the electroshock current in the brain. Perhaps minor differences
in the resistance of the skull, in the distribution of blood vessels
and their permeability or in the arrangement of nerve tracts create
differences in the pathways taken by the current. Under such circumstances, different portions of the brain may receive more or less
current in one patient as compared to another. Differences in the
type of electrical activity generated by these variously affected areas
might account for variability in the EEG.
Available studies employing direct intracerebral measurements
indicate considerable diffusion of current throughout the brain (6,
9, 16, 21). However, a concentration of current anteriorly and along
large neuronal pathways, such as the corpus callosum, has been
demonstrated. No further information is available as to amounts
of current received by more speciﬁc cerebral areas.
Due to the high resistance of the skull only a small portion of
the applied current actually reaches the brain. The amount of
current entering different portions of the brain is said to be determined by the resistance of the skull overlying these areas, the anterior concentration of current being the result‘of the thinness of
the temporal bone with its consequent lower resistance as compared
to other parts of the skull (9, 21).
Several considerations, however, indicate that individual differences in these factors of resistance and amount of current reaching
different areas of the brain are of minor, if any, importance in the
EEG response during electroshock. It is the occurrence of the generalized seizure per se, rather than the passage of electricity, which
is the primary factor. During a course of grand mal therapy induced
by nonelectrical means such as metrazol, EEG changes occur which
are similar, in general, to those seen with electroshock (13, 14).
Diffuse slow-wave activity, accentuated anteriorly, and spike or
spike-wave activity are described. The amount of slow-wave activity
increases during treatment'but shows individual variability unrelated to the number of treatments. Another observation is that
electroshock therapy which induces petit mal (8, 18) or focal (3)
seizures rather than grand mal does not produce the characteristic

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT
237
build-up of slow-wave activity. In addition, there is no increase in
the degree of delta activity in our patients in whom
mal

grand
therapy is given with high suprathreshold stimuli as compared to
those in whom threshold stimuli are used.
Factors of current cannot be entirely dismissed, however.
Even
with grand mal therapy, the type of current
employed may inﬂuence the EEG change. We have conﬁrmed a previous
study (20)
showing that the rate of increase of delta activity is slower in
therapy with unidirectional current than in that with
alternating
current. Similarly, brief stimulus therapy is said to produce smaller
degrees of alteration in the EEG as compared to alternating
current
therapy (15).
The other theory to be considered in explaining the
variability
in EEG responsiveness, and the one which is
probably more decisive,
involves inherent differences in neurophysiological
reactivity. By
this is meant both the quantitative and
qualitative aspects of the
inherent capacity of the nervous system to respond to stimuli
or
injury. Not only the degree of response, but also the
type of response, may have these determinants. The type and degree of EEG
abnormalities developed during electroshock therapy
to be
appear
the reﬂection of such inherent individual differences in
neurophysiological reactivity.
Several types of investigation may serve to test this
hypothesis.
Methods other than electroshock known to produce EEG
alterations
could be applied prior to treatment. These might include
lowering
the blood sugar by parenteral insulin, intravenous administration
of
convulsants such as metrazol or Megimide, photic
stimulation, or
the intravenous administration of drugs such as barbiturate.
In addition, perhaps the actual electroshock seizure threshold or the
pattern
or severity of the seizures may be a measure of nervous
system responsiveness. Data from such investigations could be correlated
with the degree and types of EEG change during electroshock.
In
this manner it might be possible to demonstrate different
patterns
of neurophysiological reactivity and to classify individuals
accord-

ingly.
Such studies may not only help in understanding the
variability
in the EEG alterations during electroshock but would have
wider
application to other problems in clinical electroencephalography
and neurology. For example, the basis for the development of
spontaneous seizures secondary to traumatic, vascular, or
neoplastic
lesions of the nervous system is not known. Patients with lesions

�238

MARTIN A. GREEN

comparable in type, size and location may or may not develop
seizures. As previously described, some subjects show spike or spikewave activity during electroshock. This suggests an inherent difference in the capacity to develop clinical seizures or EEG seizure
activity following “injury” to the nervous system, whether the injury
is spontaneous or induced. Differences in this capacity may be
reﬂected in varying patterns of neurophysiological reactivity.
Differences in neurophysiological reactivity may also be manifested in the pretreatment EEG. Patients in whom the pretreatment
record is abnormal (ll), “instabile” (22), or shows a predominant
alpha rhythm (5) are said to develop the greatest alteration in the
EEG during electroshock. Other investigators have not conﬁrmed
these observations (2, 23). Actually, such correlations depend on the
method of analysis of the pretreatment record employed and the
criteria used for “abnormality.” Further investigation of this relationship is necessary.
Suggesting that neurophysiological reactivity is an inherent
process does not imply that a physiological basis does not exist or
cannot be investigated. This may reside in the central nervous
system itself, consisting of individual differences in neurochemical
systems or in the permeability of cells or blood vessels; or it may be
outside the nervous system. Individual differences in hormonal or
other humoral substances produced during the stress of electroshock
may serve to “sensitize” or “desensitize” the cerebrum with regard
to developing different amounts and types of electrical activity.
That such factors may be operative is suggested by the following
studies. Trypan red injected intraperitoneally in cats before a course
of electroshock decreased the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and reduced the degree of EEG changes as compared to control
animals (1). Atropine and scopolamine administered during a
course of electroshock in man blocked the development of the usual
slow-wave activity (24).
Electroshock therapy affords an excellent opportunity for the
experimental investigation of the problem of an inherent neurophysiological reactivity. One is able to apply studies directly to man
rather than animals. The stimulus to the central nervous system can
be standardized and the degree of neurophysiological change controlled, within limits, by changing different parameters. Tests of
EEG responsivity can be given before such changes are induced as
well as during and after treatment. Restudy of patients is often
possible when subsequent courses of treatment are necessary.
I

‘

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

239

SUMMARY

Individual differences, both quantitative and qualitative, in
the EEG changes during a course of electroshock
treatment in
eighty-nine patients are described.
2. These differences are pronounced and
are not explainable
by age, sex, type of shock current, frequency of treatment,
psychiatric diagnosis, or clinical change.
3. An inherent capacity for
neurophysiological change that has
both quantitative and qualitative aspects may be the
primary determinant of these differences.
4. Variation in skull resistance and in the
amount of current
reaching the brain appear to be minor factors.
5. Investigations that might serve to
test the hypothesis presented are described. Such studies may lead eventually to a classification of individuals as to different patterns of
neurophysiological
reactivity and clarify other problems in clinical neurology and
electroencephalography.
1.

REFERENCES
Aird, R. B.; Strait, L. A.; Pace, J. W.; Hrenoff, M. K. 8: Bowditch, S. C.:
Current Pathway and Neurophysiological Effects of Electrically Induced
Convulsions. J. Nerv. (‘5' Ment. Dis., 123:505-512, 1956.
(2) Bagchi, B. K.; Howell, R. W. 8: Schmale, H. T.: The
Electroencephalographic and Clinical Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions in the
Treatment of Mental Disorders. Am. ]. Psychiat, 102:49-61, 1945.
(3) Bergman, P. S.; Impastato, D. J.; Berg, S. 8c Feinstein, R.:
Electroencephalographic Changes Following Electrically Induced Focal Seizures. Conf.
Neurol., 13:271-277, 1953.
(4) Callaway, E. 8c Boucher, F.: Slow Wave Phenomena in
Intensive Electroshock. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2:157-162, 1950.
(5) Chusid, J. G. 8c Pacella, B. L.: The
Electroencephalogram in Electric Shock
Therapies. ]. Nerv. €7- Ment. Dis., 116:95-107, 1952.
(6) Delgado, J. M. R.; Alexander, L..&amp; Hamlin, H.: Effects
of Electroshock on
the Cortical and Intracerebral Electroactivity of the Brain in
Schizophrenic
Patients. Conf. Neurol., 13:287-294, 1953.
(7) Fink, M. Sc Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta
Activity to Behavioral Re»
spouse in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (‘3‘Psychiat., 78:516—525, 1957.
(8) Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L. 8c Green, M. A.:
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. J. Nerv. &amp;- Ment. Dis. (in
press).
(9) Hayes, K. J.: The Current Path in Electric Convulsion
Shock. Arch. Neurol.
é} Psychiat., 63:102-109, 1950.
(10) Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman, I. C. 8c
Pincus, 0.: Changes in the
Electroencephalogram and in the Excretion of 17-Ketosteroids
AccompanyElectroshock
ing
Therapy of Agitated Depression. Psychosom. Med., 8:246251, 1946.
(1)

�MARTIN A. GREEN

240

Willner, M. D.: Signiﬁcance of Changes in the Electroencephalogram Which Results from Shock Therapy. Am. ]. Psychiat., 105:

(11) Kennard, M. A. 8:

40-45, 1948.

'

(12) Klotz, M.: Serial Changes Due to Electrotherapy. Dis. Nerv. Sys., 16:120-122,
1955.
(13) Knott, G. R.; Gottlieb, J. S.; Leet, H. H. 8c Hadley, H. D., Jr.: Changes in
the Electroencephalogram Following Metrazol Shock Therapy: A Quantitative
Study. Arch. Neural. (5" Psychiat., 50:529-534, 1943.
(14) Levy, N. A.; Serota, H. M. Sc Grinker, R. R.: Disturbance in Brain Function

Following Convulsive Shock Therapy. Arch. Neurol.
1027, 1942.

(‘5'

Psychiatu 47:1009-

(15) Liberson, W. T.: Current Evaluation of Electric Convulsive Therapy. Res.
Publ. Ass. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 31:199-231, 1951.
(16) Lorimer, F. M.: Sega], M. M. Sc Stein, S. A.: Path of Current Distribution
in Brain During Electroconvulsive Therapy. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1:
343-348, 1949.
(17) Moriarity, J. D. 8c Siemens, J. C.: Electroencephalographic Study of Electric
Shock Therapy. Arch. Neurol. é» Psychiat., 57:712—718, 1947.
(18) Pacella, B. L.; Barrera, S. W. 8c Kali'nowsky, L.: Variations in the Electro-

encephalogram Associated with Electric Shock Therapy of Patients with Mental Disorders. Arch. Neural. E} Psychiat., 47 :367-384, 1942.
(19) Proctor, L. D. 8c Goodwin, J. E.: Clinical and Electra-physiological Observations Following Electroshock. Am. J. Psychiat., 101 :707-800, 1945.
(20) Proctor, L. D. 8: Goodwin, J. E.: Comparative Electroencephalographic
Observations Following Electroshock Therapy Using Raw 60 Cycle Alternating and Unidirectional Fluctuating Current. Am. ]. Psychiat., 99:525530, 1943.

Wegener, C. F .: On Electric Convulsive Therapy with Particular Regard to a Parietal Application of Electrodes Controlled by Intracerebral Voltage Measurements. Acta Psychiat. et Neural, 19:529-549, 1944.
(22) Sulzbach, W.; Tillotson, K. J.; Guillemin, V., Jr. 8: Sutherland, G. F.: A
Consideration of Some Experience with Electric Shock Treatment in Mental
Diseases, with Special Regard to Various Psychosomatic Phenomena and to
Certain Electra-technical Factors. Am. J. Psychiat., 99:519-524, 1943.
(23) Taylor, R. M. Sc Pacella, B. L.: The Signiﬁcance of Abnormal Electroencephalograms Prior to Electroconvulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. (S; Ment. Dis.,

(21) Smith, J. W.

8c

107:220—227, 1948.

-

Johnson, M. W.: Effect of Atropine and Scopolamine Upon
Electroencephalographic Changes Induced by Electro-convulsive Therapy.

(24) Ulett, G. A.

8c

EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol, 9:217-224, 1957.
(25) Weil, A. A. 8c Brinegar, W. C.: Electroencephalographic Studies Following
Electric Shock Therapy. Arch. Neural. é" Psychiat., 57 2719-729, 1947.

�ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL
CUTANEOUS STIMULI1
HYMAN KORIN, PH.D.2

and

MAX FINK, M.D.3

In the course of extensive investigations (1, 2, 3) into the perception of multiple simultaneous stimuli, the pattern of failure of
subjects accurately to report one of two stimuli led to a concept of
an “order of dominance” in cutaneous perception. Since then, the
relationship of the observed pattern of dominance to biologic and
psychiatric concepts of body image and body scheme has been the
subject of considerable speculation (4, 7, 8, 14).
The interrelationship of body areas was initially clearly demonstrated in simultaneous tactile tests of face and hand (2), in which it
was noted that the stimuli to the hand were frequently not reported
or mislocalized. These phenomena of “extinction” and “displacement” led to the inference that cheek area stimuli were “dominant”
to hand stimuli. In subsequent reports (3, 10, ll, 12) a pattern of
dominance for tactile stimuli was described in which the face and
the primary genital areas were the most perceptive or dominant
areas; the hand was the least dominant; and the shoulder, foot,
buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen fell between these extremes in a mild gradient. These observations were made in normal
adults and children and psychiatric patients, but were most clearly
discerned in patients with brain disease. Indeed, the major portion
of the data relates to a group of patients with severe diffuse brain
dysfunction under observation in a general psychiatric hospital.
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service.
2Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital.
3 Director,
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
241

�242

KORIN—FINK

The basis for these phenomena

is unclear.

In a review of the

problem (3) consideration was given to hypotheses ascribing signiﬁcance to anatomic, psychophysical, genetic, environmental and neurophysiologic factors. In their conclusions, Bender, Green and Fink
note that “no one theory adequately explains the organization of
this pattern. Learning and maturation are probably factors, but it
appears to be mostly inherent.” In studies of patients with brain
disease and normal young children, Cohn (4, 5) emphasized the
rostral order of dominance and ascribed signiﬁcance to “an ontogenetic or phylogenetic thalamic residue in the sensory organization
of the human brain.” He also noted speciﬁcally that this pattern
was primarily associated with “the over-all sentient function of
the brain.”
A more extensive elaboration of a maturational and developmental explanation of the order of dominance has been proposed
(14). Taking the infantile patterns of sutking and feeding as a
model, Linn ascribes dominance to the face as it is the oldest element
in the body image; the dominant role of the genital area to the intensity of pleasurable sensation that the infant elicits from masturbation; and the subordinate position of the hand to its role as an
exploring and tension-relieving appendage wherein it holds second
place in awareness to its stimulation of the more exciting mouth
and genitalia.
A neurophysiologic View was advanced by Critchley (6, 7), who,
after expressing a preference for the term “tactile inattention” instead of “extinction,” emphasized the rostral order of dominance.
He stated that “strong stimulation of the healthy side suppresses
the attenuated sensations on the impaired side,” and concluded
that “tactile inattention in parietal patients is probably no more
than an instance of local neglect or disregard, which may be demonstrated at times in many other spheres of consciousness besides the
tactile—whether motor, visual or spatial.”
A psychophysical explanation was eschewed by Bender, Fink and
Green (3, 10, 11), who found no relation between the order of
dominance and the tactile threshold for touch or pin prick. DennyBrown, Meyer and Horenstein (8), however, insisted that these patterns were only apparent when there was an alteration or loss of
twopoint discrimination. They further demonstrated that the extinction of the hand stimulus by a stimulus to the leg could be
overcome by four stimuli to the hand. The dominance of the cheek
to the hand could not, however, be altered by ten stimuli to the
hand in their subject.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

243

The following data further emphasize psychophysical factors in
perception under the conditions of multiple simultaneous stimulation. These studies represent the initial
report of an investigation
into the application of simultaneous tactile stimulation tests to the
problem of measurement of the alteration in brain function induced by electroshock therapy. In the course of this study electrical
stimuli were applied to the cheek and hand of psychiatric patients.
Stimuli were either at threshold or suprathreshold levels.
Two aspects of the data are presented: (a) the effect of alteration
of relative strength of stimulus in the order of dominance
on facehand tests; and (b) relation of perceptual thresholds to the order of

dominance.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

The subjects were thirty-four consecutive psychiatric patients
referred for electroshock therapy. The range of their
ages was between 21 and 65 and the mean age was 45. Eleven patients were
diagnosed as involutional melancholia, thirteen as manic-depressive,
depressed, eight as schizophrenia, and two as psychoneurosis mixed
type. All testing was done prior to a course of electroshock therapy
and no patient had clinical or EEG evidence of altered brain function. Each patient was tested in one session for the
purposes of this
report.
Two model S-4B Grass square wave stimulators were synchronized to deliver either single or two simultaneous electrical stimuli.
An isolation unit was connected to each stimulator to eliminate
artifacts and the output was monitored visually by an oscilloscope.
A switch box inserted in the circuit permitted
independent selection
of the various body parts. An active and an indifferent electrode,
required for each body part, were small 5%; inch steel discs placed
1 inch
apart and secured with tape. Bentonite electrode paste (Medcraft) was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes
were applied. The electrodes remained afﬁxed to the selected body
parts throughout the period of testing.
The patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine position. To alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described. It was emphasized that only a slight tap-like sensation
would be felt. The electrodes were then placed on (1) the dorsum
of the hands, (2) the mandibular area of both cheeks, and
(3) the
medial calf area of the legs.
In the testing procedure, thresholds for the various body
parts
were ﬁrst determined. At a frequency of .3 cycles/second, and a pulse
I

�244

KORIN—FINK

duration of 50 milliseconds, the voltage was increased in uniform
time increments of .67 seconds (2 pulses) monitored from the oscilloscope, until the subject perceived 100 per cent of the stimuli. Incre1 volt
of
increments
and
the
5
hand
volts
to
of
were applied
ments
to the cheeks. After a ten-second interval, the voltage was decreased
until sensation disappeared. Following another ten-second interval,
the voltage was gradually increased by 1 volt each six seconds until
the patient again reported 100 per cent of the stimuli. This reading
was considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold

sensation.
Such stimuli, at threshold and 10 per cent above the threshold,
are reported by the subjects as a “tap,” a “prick” or a “sting.” Complaints of painful perception were not elicited at these levels of
stimulation.
After the thresholds were determined, testing with a series of
single and double simultaneous stimuli followed. The body parts
tested were the right hand and left cheek (heterologous stimulation)
and the right cheek and left cheek (homologous stimulation). Both
in
mixed
singly,
a
one
stimulated
or
simultaneously,
were
part
parts
order for ten trials for each of the following conditions: (1) threshold, (2) suprathreshold (10 per cent above the threshold), (3) one
body part at suprathreshold and the other at threshold, and (4) the
reverse of (3). The order of presentation of conditions (1) and (2)
was alternated for different subjects and the same was done for
conditions (3) and (4). Similarly the order of presentation of the
heterologous and homologous stimulation was alternated.
Single stimuli were introduced as a control. Failure to report
the single stimulus indicated that the threshold had changed. When
this change occurred, stimulation was increased until a new threshold was determined and ten trials were started anew.
RESULTS

A. Threshold Values

The threshold stimulation for perception was determined for
the hands, cheeks and legs (Table I). The threshold values for the
hands and legs are three to four times higher than the thresholds
for the cheeks. While the threshold values in the legs are less than
in the hands, these differences lack statistical signiﬁcance. Variabiland
hands
the
in
legs
is
threshold
considerably
the
of
greater
ity
than in the cheeks. There is virtually no overlapping of thresholds,
however, where the cheeks and the hands are concerned.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
TABLE

245

I

Mean Thresholds and Standard Deviations of Body Parts

Mean
Thresholds (volts)
Standard
Deviation

Right

Cheek

Left
Cheek

Right
Hand

Left
Hand

Right

Leg

Left
Leg

6.76

7.85

29.25

22.35

24.50

19.52

4.47

4.86

14.88

13.60

13.99

13.64

Extinction Patterns
The difference between the number of extinctions of the right
hand or the left cheek on stimulation of both parts with either
threshold or suprathreshold stimuli was not signiﬁcant (Table 11).
Also, when both cheeks were stimulated with either threshold or
suprathreshold stimuli, there were no differences in the number of
extinctions in each cheek (Table III).
In contrast to these observations, stimulating one body part with
a suprathreshold stimulus and the other at threshold resulted in a
signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the body part stimulated
at threshold. Thus the cheek was dominant over the hand, or the
hand was dominant over the cheek depending on the body part to
which the stronger stimulus was applied (Table II). Altering the
relative strength of the stimuli applied to the cheeks resulted in a
similar predictable change in the pattern of dominance (Table III).
Further analysis of the data in Table II indicates that the hand
B.

TABLE 11

Mean Extinctions of Cheek and Hand for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Mean
Extinctions Extinctions
of Hand
of Cheek

Hand and Cheek at
Threshold
Hand and Cheek at
Suprathreshold
Hand at Suprathreshold
and Cheek at Threshold
Cheek at Suprathreshold
and Hand at Threshold

Difference Signiﬁcance

1.55

1.56

.01

NS.

1.02

.59

.57

NS.

2.30

.22

2.08

p&lt;.01

.32

1.36

1.04

p&lt;.01

�KORIN—FINK

246

was dominant over the cheek with greater mean frequency (2.08)
than the cheek was dominant over the hand (1.04) for the thresholdsuprathreshold condition. This tendency is also evident when both

parts were simulated at suprathreshold. If it is considered that the
mean threshold for the hands is approximately 30 volts, while for
the cheeks the threshold is 7 volts, the difference in incidence of
extinction may be explained. Suprathreshold stimulation was set
at 10 per cent above the threshold value. The hand stimulus was
TABLE 111

Mean Extinctions of Both Cheeks for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation

Both Cheeks at

Threshold

Both Cheeks at

Mean
Extinctions
of Left
Cheek

Mean
Extinctions
of Right
Cheek

.39

.45

.06

N.S.

Difference Signiﬁcance

Suprathreshold
Right Cheek at
Suprathreshold and
Left Cheek at Threshold

.18

.37

.19

N.S.

.96

.14

.82

p&lt;.05

Left Cheek at Suprathreshold and Right
Cheek at Threshold

.03

1.28

1.25

p&lt;.01

therefore increased by 3 volts and the face stimulus by only 1 volt
above the threshold value. Such an increase, although proportionately equivalent, appears to have given greater relative strength to
the hand stimulus.

Extinction
Regardless of pattern, the mean total of the number of extinctions was greater when heterologous body parts were stimulated at
threshold than when these parts were stimulated with suprathreshold stimuli (Table IV). For these same conditions of stimulation the
diﬂerences between the mean number of extinctions obtained on
homologous stimulation of the cheeks lack statistical signiﬁcance,
but the results are in the direction which indicate that a greater
number of extinctions occur when two body parts are stimulated
at threshold (Table IV). The failure to obtain a. signiﬁcant difference in the latter instance is partly due to the fact that relatively few
C. Incidence of

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

247

TABLE IV

Mean of Combined Number of Extinctions For Varying Conditions
of Threshold and Suprathreshold‘ Stimuli

Both Parts at Both Parts at A-Suprathreshold A-Threshold
Threshold Suprathreshold B-Threshold
B-Suprathreshold
A-Cheek

3.11

1.63

1.68

2.43

.85

.56

1.31

1.10

B-Hand
A-Left Cheek
B—Right Cheek

Differences between the mean number of extinctions at threshold and the
other three conditions of stimulation are signiﬁcant for the cheek and hand but
are insigniﬁcant for both cheeks.
*

extinctions are elicited when homologous parts are stimulated.
These ﬁndings on the total number of extinctions are in agreement
with previous observations (2).
DISCUSSION

The pattern of extinction following electrical stimulation of the
skin with threshold and suprathreshold stimuli has been determined.
In contrast to the ﬁndings of investigators (3) who used clinical
(tactile) stimulation, the face stimuli were not reported more frequently than the hand Stimuli. Under the conditions of the method
of testing in this investigation, nevertheless, it is clear that the
pattern of extinction for any two body parts can be readily altered
by varying the relative strength of the stimuli. Thus a suprathreshold stimulus applied to the hand tends to obscure a threshold stimulus applied to the cheek and when these stimulus intensities are
reversed, the cheek tends to obscure the hand.
Theories which hold that dominance of the cheek over the hand,
in simultaneous tactile testing, is due to an inherent factor, perceived body image, rostral dominance, developmental principle or a
learned factor, are not supported by these observations under our
conditions of testing. If any of these factors were involved, a pattern
of face dominance should have been elicited when the hand and
cheeks were stimulated with equivalent electrical stimuli at threshold and suprathreshold intensities, despite the methodological dif-

�248

KORIN—FINK

ference introduced by the procedure of affixing electrodes to the
skin.
The ﬁndings in this study, namely that differences in the strength
of the simultaneous stimuli can alter the pattern of extinction, supports a stimulus-intensity hypothesis. By inference, differences in
threshold also play a signiﬁcant role.
That an intense stimulus elsewhere can raise the pain threshold
as much as 35 per cent has been demonstrated by Hardy, Wolf and
Goodell (13). This effect of a relatively intense stimulus on the
threshold of another stimulus has also been found by investigators
using other stimuli (8, 9). The problem still remains, however, how
it is that a pattern of dominance may be elicited when presumably
equivalent stimuli are applied by touch stimuli.
The results of this study suggest an explanation. Stimuli of
differing intensities are required to elicit a threshold sensation for
various body parts. When these stimuli are increased 10 per cent,
the resultant stimuli are proportional and are perceived as equivalent. In contrast, in clinically touching two body parts, the stimuli
are disproportionate relative to the threshold value although approximately of equal intensity in their application. Because of the
differences in threshold for the hand and cheek, the tactile stimulus
to the cheek is proportionately more above the threshold than the
stimulus to the hand. Thus the cheek is perceived more frequently
than the hand stimulus and has been considered “dominant.”
A threshold hypothesis was rejected (3) on the basis that the
thresholds obtained by von Frey (16) for pressure and pain do not
strictly correspond to the dominance order elicited by the double
simultaneous stimulation tests. Most difﬁcult to reconcile is von
Frey’s ﬁnding that the pressure threshold of the glans penis, which
is second in dominance rank only to the cheek in a group of ten
body parts tested, is 111 grams per square millimeter; while the
threshold of the hand, which is at least dominant, is only 12 grams
per square millimeter.
Unfortunately, thresholds in the genital area for male and female have seldom been determined. Von Frey’s list of thresholds
(16) is based on a single subject. His more detailed observations (17),
however, indicate that there is virtually no pressure sense in the
glans penis or clitoris, although the perception of pain, warmth and
cold is well developed. It is quite possible that the punctate pressure threshold does not correlate with touch where the genital area
is concerned but that instead some other sense or combination of
senses is involved.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

249

Thresholds for the dorsum of the hand and the cheek obtained
by von Frey and other investigators indicate that the cheek is considerably more sensitive than the hand. These ﬁndings are in agreement with the thresholds obtained in this study. In a recent study
of electrical thresholds at various body sites Sigel (15) reported that
“leg areas including thigh and ankle, also dorsum of the hands and
the palm showed a deﬁnite tendency for higher thresholds. Scalp,
temple, forehead and face tended to have lower thresholds. The
anterior chest and upper arm and anterior wrist areas showed a
tendency for lower thresholds. Neck areas, abdomen and upper back
showed no deﬁnite trend.” In this statement there is no disagreement with the clinically observed order of dominance.
From the experimental results obtained here, it is proposed that
the dominance hierarchy elicited under the conditions of simultane—
ous testing may be explained on the basis of the relative strength
of the stimuli and the stimulus threshold.
SUMMARY

Using square wave electrical stimuli, the threshold for perception in the hands, cheeks and calves were determined in thirtyfour psychiatric patients. Simultaneous stimuli were applied in
random sequence to combinations of cheek and hand and both
cheeks, at threshold, suprathreshold and combinations of threshold
and suprathreshold intensities.
With simultaneous threshold, or simultaneous suprathreshold
stimulation, the differences between the number of extinctions in
either part were not signiﬁcant. With stimuli of unequal intensity
(one stimulus at threshold and one suprathreshold), however, there
was a signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the threshold
stimulus.
The total number of extinctions is greater with threshold than
with suprathreshold stimuli; and greater in heterologous than in
homologous patterns of stimulation.
It is concluded that the observed order of dominance in simultaneous cutaneous tests may be explained by psychophysical relationships.
REFERENCES
(1)

Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld, Ill.: Charles Thomas,

(2)

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M. 8c Green, M. A.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (9 Psychiat., 66:

1952.

355-362, 1951.

�250
(3)

KORIN—FINK
Bender, M. B.; Green, M. A. 8: Fink, M.: Patterns of Perceptual Organization
with Simultaneous Stimuli. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 67- Psychiat., 72:233-255
,
1954.

(4)

(5)

(5)
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)
(11)

Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of the Sensory Organization of the Human
Brain: A Study in Rostral Dominance as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation. J. New. 6» Ment. Dis., 113:471-484, 1951.
Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the Human Brain:
II—A Study in Rostral Dominance in Children. Neurology, 1:119-122, 1951.
Critchley, M.: The Parietal Lobes. London: Edward Arnold 8c Co., 1953.
Critchley, M.: Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference
to Parietal Lesions. Brain, 72:538-561, 1949.
Denny-Brown, D.; Meyer, J. S. 8c Horenstein, S.: The Signiﬁcance of Perceptual Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion. Brain, 75:433-471, 1952.
Duncker, K.: Some Preliminary Experiments on the Mutual Inﬂuence of
Pains. Psychol. Forsch, 21:311-326, 1937.
Fink, M. Sc Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in
Normal Children. Neurology, 3:27-34, 1953.
Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8c Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile
Stimuli by Mentally Defective Subjects. J. Nerv. 69'» Ment. Dis., 117:43-49,
1953.

(12) Fink, M.; Green, M. A.
(13)

(14)
(15)

(15)

Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
Hardy, J. D.; Wolf, H. S. 8c Goodell, H.: Studies on Pain. A New Method
for Measuring Pain Threshold: Observations on Spatial Summation of Pain.
J. Clin. Invest., 19:649-658, 1940.
Linn, L.: Some Developmental Aspects of the Body Image. Int. J. Psychoanal., 36:1—7, 1955.
Sigel, H.: Cutaneous Sensory Threshold Stimulation with High
Frequency
Square-Wave Current: 11. The Relationship of Body Site and Skin Diseases
to the Sensory Threshold. J. Invest. Derm., 18:447-451, 1952.
von Frey, M.: Beitréige zur Physiologic des Schmerzsinns. Ber. Siichs. Ges.
8c

Wiss., 46:185-196, 283-296, 1894.
(17) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Sinnesphysiologie der Haut. Ber. Siichs.
Ges.
Wiss., 47: 166-184, 1895.

�NEWS AND NOTES

DR. MILLER ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTOR OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller, Medical Director of Hillside Hospital, has
announced the appointment of Dr. Lewis L. Robbins of Topeka,
Kansas as Director of Professional Services at Hillside Hospital,

starting July 1, 1958.
Dr. Robbins has been connected for many years with the Menninger Foundation, and has held many senior positions at the
Foundation, including the Directorship of the Outpatient Depart
ment, and up to about a year ago, the Directorship of the Department of Adult Psychiatry. During the past year, he has been Senior
Psychiatric Consultant and Chairman of the Psychotherapy Research
Project at Menninger’s.
Born in Chicago, Dr. Robbins was graduated from the University
of Chicago and received his medical training at the Rush Medical
School. He interned at the Michael Reese Hospital, Chicago; and
had his psychiatric residency training at the latter hospital as well
as at the Menninger Sanitarium. He graduated from the Topeka
Institute for Psychoanalysis. He is a Diplomate of the American
Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and also holds the American
Psychiatric Association’s Certiﬁcate as a Mental Hospital Administrator.
Dr. Robbins has been an instructor in psychiatry at the Washington School of Medicine and a lecturer in psychiatry at the University of Kansas Medical School, the Menninger School of Psychiatry
as well as a training analyst at the Topeka Institute for Psychoanalysis. He is a member of numerous national and regional societies, including fellowship in the American College of Physicians,
the American Psychiatric Association, American Orthopsychiatric
Association, the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry; and he
also holds important ofﬁces on the executive and other committees
of the American Psychiatric and American Psychoanalytic Associations, and is currently the Secretary of the American Psychoanalytic
Association.
Hillside welcomes Dr. Robbins to its staff. The position of Directorship of Professional Services will include the general direction
of the Hospital’s treatment, teaching, and some of the important
research programs of the Hospital.
251

�252

NEWS AND NOTES
SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR RESIDENTS DURING 1957—1958

We are pleased to announce that we have engaged the teaching
services of three prominent psychiatrists and psychoanalysts for the
special instruction of our Residents during the 1957-1958 season.
These are:
(1) Dr. Robert C. Bak, whose course will be on “The Psychopathology of the Psychoses, with Special Reference to the Schizophrenias.” The lectures will be given at the Hospital on Wednesdays
from October 1957 through May 1958, from 12:00 to 1:00 P.M.
(2)Dr. Paul Goolker, who will be giving the course on “Principles
and Practice of Dynamic Psychotherapy for Hospitalized Patients.”
This course will be given during the same period on Fridays from
12:00 to 1:00 RM.
(3) Dr. I. Peter Glauber will be in charge of the course on
“Important Readings in Psychoanalytic Psychiatry.” This will be
given at the Hospital on Thursdays from 11:45 A.M. to 12:45 P.M.
As has been the custom, these lectures to the total Resident staff
will be preceded by three hours of special conferences including
group preceptorship of a number of Residents and their particular
Supervisor.
A SPECIAL COURSE OF LECTURES ON GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY

We have the pleasure of announcing that Dr. Aaron Stein, the
Director of the Group Psychotherapy Program at the Hospital, will
be giving an introductory course of lectures to our Resident staff;
and that all members of the psychiatric Attending Staffs and the
Clinical Assistants of both the Manhattan and Queens Clinics are
cordially invited to attend.
The lectures will be held at the Hospital in Glen Oaks on Saturday mornings from 9:00 to 10:15 A.M., beginning Saturday, September 28 and up to Saturday, December 21.
Dr. Stein is an Associate Attending Psychiatrist at the Hospital
and an authority in group psychotherapy. He plans to cover the
important practical aspects of the subject, including general principles, selection of patients, group psychodynamics. the role of the
group therapist, relationship between group and individual psychotherapy, etc.
J.S.A.M.

�Recent and Forthcoming Publications
INSTINCTIVE BEHAVIOR
The Development of a Modern Concept
Translated and edited by CLAIRE H. SCHILLER
Introduction by KARL S. LASHLEY
With contributions by Konrad Lorenz, Paul H. Schiller, Nicholas
Tinbergen, Jakob von Uexkiill
120 illustrations, $7.50

EROGENEITY AND LIBIDO
Some Addenda to the Theory of the Psychosexual Development of

the Human
Psychoanalytic Series, Volume I

By ROBERT FLIEss

$7.50

YOUTH AND CRIME
Proceedings of the Law Enforcement Institute Held at New York
University
Edited by FRANK J. COHEN
$6.00

ON THE UTILITY OF MEDICAL HISTORY
Institute on Social and Historical Medicine, Monograph I
The New York Academy of Medicine
Edited by IAGO GALDSTON

$2.00

ON NOT BEING ABLE TO PAINT
New Revised Edition
By MARION MILNER

Foreword by

illustrated, $4.50

ANNA FREUD

or order directly from
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street
New York 11, N. Y.

At your bookstore

1]

�THE INDEX OF PSYCHOANALYTIC WRITINGS
ALEXANDER GRINSTEIN, M .D.
5 Volumes, sold as set only, $75.00

Volumes I and II, now available

Volume III, Fall, 1957

The Index covers the entire psychoanalytic literature through 1952.
Every book, article, review or abstract is listed in alphabetical sequence
according to authors and titles. There are approximately 37,500 listings
drawn from 25 psychoanalytic publications and some 75 journals containing articles by psychoanalysts or about psychoanalysis and closely
related subjects. Psychoanalytic books and articles, published in 21
languages, have been included, and foreign-language titles have been
translated into English. The most invaluable feature is a separate subject
index with some 30,000 topical entries. In addition, there are a number
of appendices. One of them lists nonanalytic books reviewed in psychoanalytic journals. The others are devoted to a chronological listing of

the writings of psychoanalytic pioneers. Among them is the ﬁrst complete bibliography of Sigmund Freud’s writings and published letters.
Dr. Heinz Hartmann says: “Psychoanalysis has reached a stage at
which a truly comprehensive index of analytical literature has become
a necessity. Many questions of principle had to be decided, on the
methods of listing, on the degrees of inclusiveness, etc., in order to
make this Index a valuable tool for research workers in psychoanalysis
and related ﬁelds. Dr. Grinstein made these decisions with considerable
wisdom and objectivity, guided by a lucid understanding of all the
rather complex problems inherent in his tremendous task. This task
might well have looked forbidding and frightened off many a less
courageous man. Having become accustomed to using Volume I of
The Index of Psychoanalytic Writings (other volumes are to follow
soon), I can say that the obvious difﬁculties of this comprehensive
venture have been successfully overcome and that this imposing work
has proved of the greatest value to me, and without doubt to very
many others.”
At your book store

or order directly from
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street
New York 11, N. Y.
.
1]

�JOURNAL of the

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
VOLUME

VI

1957

NUMBERS 1-4

CONTENTS
Scientiﬁc Papers
Blane, Howard T. and Glad, Erik—THE

PSYCHOLOGIST AND
THE PSYCHIATRIC TEAM IN A RESPIRATOR CENTER
.

Boyer, L. Bryce—THE MEANING
SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENT

Desmonde, William H.—THE
ANIMAL SACRIFICE

.

.

OF INSULIN THERAPY TO A
.

.

24

.

.

.

.

.

.

ORIGIN OF MONEY IN THE
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Devereux, George—THE

CRITERIA OF DUAL CO‘MPETENCE IN
PSYCHIATRIC-ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDIES .

87

Fink, Max—A

UNIFIED THEORY OF THE ACTION OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Glynn, Eugene—THE THERAPEUTIC USE
ADOLESCENT PAVILION

.

.

.

OF SECLUSION IN AN
.

.

Green, Martin A.—SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL
IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK .
.

Jaﬁe, Joseph—AN OBJECTIVE

1 9‘7

.

.

.

.

156

VARIABLIITY
.

229

.

STUDY OF COMMUNICATION IN
.

207

FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY
MENTAL HOSPITAL .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

216

PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Kakn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; and Fink, Max—SOCIAL

Karin, Hyman and Fink Max—ROLE

OF STIMULUS INTENSITY
IN PERCEPTION OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS

STIMULI.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

241

�Locke, N orman—REMARKS

PSYCHOLOGY AND THE

ON THE

GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY OF THE HARD OF HEARING

100

.

M eerloo, ]oost A. M .—Kos

AGAINST KNIDOS: AMBIVALENCE AS
THE PSYCHIATRIC OUTLOOK ON MAN .
.
.
.
.

67

M ullan, H ugh—GROUP

PSYCHOTHERAPY IN PRIVATE PRACTICE:
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

34

Nz'ederland, William

G.——THE SYMBOLIC RIVER-SISTER EQUATION IN POETRY AND FOLKLORE

Reider, N OTman—TRANSFERENCE

PSYCHOSIS

Slap, Joseph William—PSYCHOTHERAPY

91
131

.

WITH A CASE

OF

43

MALADIE DES TICS

Slap, [oseph William—SOME CLINICAL

AND

THEORETICAL

150

REMARKS ON CHESS

Clinical Symposium
OUTPATIENT TREATMENT VIA PSYCHOTHERAPY OF A CHARACTER NEUROTIC WITH IMPOTENCE
Part 1: Case presentation by Lionel Blackmcm

Part II:

Discussion

Book Review
News and Notes

107
160
180

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

55,121,182,251

�NO and YES
on the genesis of human communication
By RENE A. SPITZ

$4.00

Dr. Spitz, well known for his original studies of the psychological

‘

i

development of infants, devote-s a monograph to the beginnings of com~
munication. He tackles this most important problem from a broad
basis, using the theoretical framework of pSychoanalysis; direct ob’servations of infants, both normal and abnormal; and the newest
ﬁndings of animal ethology, experimental psychology, embryology and
physiology. Skillfully integrating the dataiobtained by thesescience'sr
Dr. .Spitz presents a most fascinating and thought-provoking theory of,
the roots of communication, both verbal and nonverbal.
Dr. Spitz eXa-mines the inherited or preformed motor behavior patterns whiCh have a function in the earl1est nursing situation. Both
negatiOn as well as afﬁrmation have such early motor prototypes, which
in the Course of deve10pment undergo a change of' function. Divorced,
fromthe behavior they originally subserved, these motor patterns can
now be utilized exclusively as signals of communication. Later, endowed with semantic meaning which the child acquires through identiﬁcation with the adult’s “No” gesture, they are used for communication proper.
Though drawing upon the data and theories of other sciences, the
framework of this monograph rests upon Freud's fundamental insights
into human pSychological development. Its, major contribution is the
minute examination of some of; the building blocks of‘Freud’s theory.
This proc'edUre permits the author to throw light on hitherto unexplored interrelations between speCIﬁc aspects of behaviOr1n infants.
these ﬁndings emerges the generally applicable concepts of
From
‘
“organizers of psychic development" as well as a description of the
origins of the Selfin infancy. These ﬁndings have the widest implications for clinical psychoanalysis as well as the study of human relations
in general.
.

.

‘

.&lt;

..

.1

2...:

.J

_

‘

’

—.—___‘_____________________
At your bookstore.
or order directly from
‘

1]

INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227. West 13 Street
'New York 11, N. Y.
.
,

'

�M
THE PS’YCHOANALYTIC STUDY OF THE CHILD
Volume XII, $8.50

Contents. of the Newest Volume

ERNST KRIS,

1.9004957

Contributions to Psychoanalytic Theory

Nature and Development of the Concept of Repression in Freud's Writings
PHYLLIS GREENAcRE—The Childhood of the Artist
EDITH JACOBSON—On Normal and Pathological Moods
Pathoand
Normal
JEANNE LAMPL—-DE GRoor—On Defense and Development:

‘CHARLES BRENNER—The

logical

RUDOLPH M. LOE-WENSTEIM—eSomt}

Thoughts on Interpretation in the Theory

and Practice of Psychoanalysis
SEYMOUR L. LUSTMAN—Psychic Energy and Mechanisms. of Defense

’

Aspects of Early Development

CAsusoe-Anxiety Related to the Discovery of the‘Penis': An Observation. With an Introduction by ANNA FREUD
MARIANNE KRIS—The Use of Prediction in :1 Longitudinal Study
WILLIAM G. NIEDERLAND—The Earliest Dreams of a Young Child
GABRIEL

_

‘

ANNEMARIE SANDLER, ELIZABETH DAUNTON and ANNELIESE SCHNURMANN—
Inconsistency in the Mother as a. Factor in Character Development: A
Comparative Study. With an Introduction by ANNA FREUD
V

Clinical Contributions

PETER BLos—Preoedipal Factors in the Etiology of Female Delinquency
ERNA FURMAN—Treatment of UndeﬁFiV'es by Way of Parents
ELISABETH GELEERD—Some' ASPects

cents

of Psychoanalytic Technique in Adoles-

BELA MITrELMANN—‘Motility in the Therapy of Children
NATHAN N. ROOT—A Neurosis in Adolescence
MARGARETE

and Adults

RUBEN—Delinquency; A Defense Against Loss of ObjeCts and

Reality
LISBETH J. SACHS—On Changes in Identiﬁcation frOm Machine to Cripple
‘

Applied Psychoanalysis

the Salamander’
StanislaVsk-i
PHILIP WEISSMAN—The Childhood and Legacy of

ROBERT PLANK—On ‘fSeeing

______—__‘_____._______———————————or- order directly from
{I
At your bookstore
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
0
New York 11, ‘N. Y.
227 West 13 Street,
.

.

�jam;
Rah at smug/1n Pox-caption of Simultaneous mm. swam
Pub}!

m

2

Karin $.13. and 3"!“ Fink Kenn

”amt at emu“ in “armament until. puma“: ha
m
been the object at midst-able discussion was. it: «napalm by Bender
and common and matron: wlmtim hm bun errand.

Ema:
12h.
threshold for perception
9150mm
maand
“mm,
3!;
mm
w psychiatric putienta.
«in:
mm,
simianeoua stimuli are applied in madam nqumo to lamination: o!
cheek md hand and both check: at 111mm, mthruhold and mama”
cf throdwld and mmthruhold human.

Bung aqua-o
in ’01:. hands,

Results:

40de

3mm:

cinnamon”
or
supnthromold «imam,
wmw,
the differences between the number of “auctions in aither part. were not.
nigaiﬁunt. Him «ml: or
mummy (m sum“ at thmhold
and one supmthmshold), Mater; then m a signiﬁcant meme in the
£13,1an ta «part tho thruhom.
with

W

Cancyuam
Thou data suppert tho
1:: simultaneous cutaneous

‘o‘ono "

”Ix/57

mmnm: tint the obnmd nrdor of Wm
mm are pmd upon paydmﬁysieal anaemia“.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2534">
                <text>Role of stimulus intensity in perception of simultaneous cutaneous electrical stimuli. J Hillside Hosp., 6: 241-250, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2535">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2536">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-26-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2537">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2538">
                <text>Korin, Hyman; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2539">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2540">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2541">
                <text>Reprint From the Journal of the Hillside Hospital,Vol. VI October, 1957. Full copy of the Journal of The Hillside Hospital, Vol VI, No. 4, October 1957, Table of contents: A UNIFIED THEORY: OF THE ACTION OF PHYSIODYNAMIC- THERAPIEs by Max Fink; AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS by Joseph Jaffe; SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL HOSPITAL by Robert L Kahn, Max Pollack and Max Fink; SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK by Martin A. Green; ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION 0F SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS STIMULI by Hyman Korin and Max Fink; NEWS AND NOTES.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2542">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2543">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74456">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81017">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87578">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94139">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="291" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6564">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/aaac38fc36161269f14f4617b6ef620f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>09f64ba46dc2ab1bcb50e506d78ad27a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107168">
                    <text>v._,

SOCIAL ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT IN THREE HOSPITALS:
METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS 1/

«-

hoWCV‘

in

Max Pollack, Ph. D. , Nathaniel Siegel, Ph. D.
Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D. , and Max Fink,_M. D.

-

inst

logic P
hospit‘
same }
scitiﬂg

The generalization of findings from one population to another is basic to any science.
Psychiatry. perhaps more than other medical specialties. is plagued with controversies
concerning the non-reproducibility of results. One factor responsible for this state is the
failure of investigators to adequately describe their populations and methods. The organ.
ization of multiple hospital studies makes possible the detection and clarification of the"
methodological difficulties. We would like to describe some of the problems we encountered in a recent tri-hospital study. with reference to the variables of type of treatment,
discharge diagnosis, ratings of clinical improvement at time of. discharge and length of

knoWiE

tal dis

A

routin(
at MM

-ga.

would
hoapiti

hospital stay.

pang!

Various social psychiatric studies of community and hospital psychiatric populations
(1, Z, 6) have established the importance of sociopsychological factors in the type and incidence of mental disorder. the selection and maintenance of treatment and therapeutic
evaluations. In these previous studies such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the extent and type of available treatment facilities may have been more signi.
ficant in the observed results than the social variables studied. A more critical test of the
role of soda-psychological factors in treatment would be a study in a setting where the
same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients, regardless of their
ability to pay. This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital, and in 1957, we embarked out
a program of assaying the relation of sociopsychological factors to the treatment of hospi.
talized psychiatric patients (3. 4). Each patient receives individual psychotherapy and by
request of his physician, somatotherapy (convulsive or psychopharmacological therapy).
Our method of investigation was a census-type survey of all in-patients on a given
day (3). In addition a brief modified California F Scale test (2, 5) was administered to all
patients. We observed that age, education, sex, foreign-birth. and performance on the
California I? Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hospitalization, clinical discharge ratings and to clinical diagnosis.

order to test the reliability of these findings, we repeated this study at Hillside
Hospital in 1958, employing the same procedures and, concurrently extended it to two
other institutions. the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hospital and the Massachusetts Mental
Health Center (MMHC). These institutions are similar to Hillside Hospital in that both
psychoanalytically - oriented psychotherapy and somatic therapies are available. They
were selected for the additional reason that one serves predominately socioeconomic
Class I and II patients (Menninger Hosp.) and the other. predominately Class IV and V.

L

soclat'
the let
that tr
psychc
of noti
chothe

basis'

with tl
tient c
psycht

chiatr
reside

I

ciplin'

.wn-w

gists.

view

$

In

(MMHC).

Observations

Dia n

that tl
behav
the sa
sent 5
charg

classi
these

Hospital Structure

ducin;

reporting data from ones own institution. the structure of the hospital is taken
for granted. and either ignored or briefly mentioned. When approaching a new institution._
.When

distox
Note

the department of Experimental Psychiatry,
l/ N.From
Y.

Hillside Hospital Glen Oaks,

1... I. .

Aided. in part, by grant MY-Z715 of the National Institute of Mental Health; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.
The cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C. F.
'
Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
.

202

‘

and a
five-f
comp

rion

(

Disc}:

the c:
prove

�r,

7'

attempting to gather comparable data one is made aware of the differences
institutions and the nature of the hospital organization is seen as one of the methodoBoth the MMHC and Menninger institutions have day
logic problems affecting treatment.
physician can care for the
hospital units.and Hillside does not. At the MMHC the treating
clinic. In such a
in
the
and
after-care
in
the
hospital,
day
in-patient,
an
”me patient as
the
at
from
an earlier date,
hospital
,ctting’ the treating doctor can dischargeforthe‘patient
in
Hillside Hospiwhereas
his
patient's
care;
be
he
still
responsible
will
that
Mowing
of
the
relationship.
termination
patient-doctor
ux discharge means
towcvcr- and
in

.
"ru‘

~1uwv1

different research programs. affecting clinical
survey, approximately 20 percent of the patients
been
had
and
ill
hospitalized for many years. Such a group
at MMHC were chronically
state
would not normally have been in this hospital but they were transferred from another
hospital for special study purposes.
Designation of Type of Treatment
In our assessments of specific variables, we encountered a variety of problems associated with the content of hospital records. For example, it was difficult to determine
of time spent in
the length of stay prior to referral for a somatic treatment, or the length
that treatment. However, a major problem was to learn which patients were receiving
psychotherapy. Our task was not to define psychotherapy, but the much simpler problem
of noting Which patients were designated by the hospital as having been treated with psy- ‘
chotherapy. At Menninger Hosptial, psychotherapy was administered on a prescription
basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the patient was charged an additional fee. Sessions
with the psychiatric resident physician were considered part of routine administrative patient care and were not recorded as psychotherapy. At Hillside Hospital the definition of
psypsychotherapy was limited to treatment sessions with the psychiatric resident. Staff the
chiatrists did not treat patients directly, but restricted their activity to supervising
Another problem was the presence of
routincs- For example. at the time of the

.....

.
a.

“syn

a

-w~a.u.r--

M

-.M——-.—

5"

t

V_

.

.
,.

v.71
_

.I-uv-n-

‘-.p..o-i.m

‘W,

runny-.9.

-l

residents.

‘4,"V‘OQ‘M'A'ﬁ

In contrast, at the MMHC psychotherapy was designated as a function of many disciplines - psychiatric residents, nurses. medical students, social workers and psychologists. To ascertain whether or not a patient was receiving psychotherapy we had to inter-

view

the resident physician in charge of the case.

‘71-'Nuo-nyap

..._...,.

,—

—-—
-vw“

Diagnosis

-\»
,...

a...

assessment of diagnosis was another problem area. It is not surprising
that there are institutional diagnostic “styles which reflect staff orientations rather than the
behavior of the patient. Pasamanick and his associates (7) has shown that diagnoses within
the same institution are vulnerable to individual differences among examiners. In our present study. there were differences in the terminology of the discharge diagnosis. Discharge diagnoses at Menninger Hospital were more descriptive and employed a multiple
classification system. Table I illustrates several examples and shows how we converted
these into more generic categories that could be applicable to all three institutions. In reducing multiple diagnoses to single generic ones, we were aware that we were introducing
distortions through this maneuver.
Table II illustrates the distribution of diagnostic categories within each institution.
Note that at the Menninger Hospital there was a lower incidence of diagnosed schizophrenia
and affective psychoses. while the diagnosis of personality disorder exceeds by three and
five-fold that found in the other two hospitals.- We would emphasize that cross hospital
comparisons of populations basedpn diagnosis as the single or the most important criterion does not insure comparability of populations.
The

.i-u.v.-.‘Mdh&amp;

M

u--.

,

~

~m.va-».....
P...

wv"

4

r
..

R."

s

~.

,
.

—w

.

n—‘w—w-vw-

\*_sm,~,-.w...—mp--

'

7

”avcuuuft

Discharge Ratings of Improvement

.-

Similar problems exist for the equivalence of global ratings of improvement. As in
the case of diagnosis, Menninger Hospital had the most elaborate discharge ratings of improvement and Hillside Hospital. the simplest.
.

1

~

A

.w»

wo-ﬁ-‘v.

-

w-

2

203

l
':

l

.
.

T
1’

�TYPES OF DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS

Patient Discharge Rating
1. Depression Reaction
Narcissistic Personality
2. Anxiety Reaction
Narcissistic Personality
3. Narcissistic Personality
4. Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
5. Passive Aggressive
Personality
Alcoholism
6. Infantile Personality
Schizophrenic Reaction
Schizo-Affective Type

Classification Rating
Psychoneurosis
Psychoneurosis
Personality Trait Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
'

‘

Sociopathic Personality

Disturbance

Schizophrenic Psychosis

TABLE II
DISTRIBUTION OF DIAGNOSIS (PERCENTAGE)
Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

Schizophrenia

41

52

52

Personalitybisorders

33

6

Psychoneuroses
Affective Psychoses
Organic Psychoses
Transient Personality
Disorder

14

18

8

21

16

5

l

5

2

2

6

100

173

N:

13

,

93
‘

As shown in Table, III the discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite and a
separate rating given for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside and
MMHC had similar global ratings and it is difficult to state how much weight was given to
each of the three factors incorporated in the Menninger system. Such differences in systems makes it difficult to compare treatment results of hospitalization.

Hospitalization
Length of hospitalization for most illnesses, including psychiatric disorders, commonly denotes both severity of illness and response to treatment. As such. it is frequently
used as an index for interhospital comparison. Table IV compares length of hospitalization
by age at the time of the study. There was an observable relation between length of stay
and age within each institution, with age being inversely related to length of hospitalization.
Yet. among these three hospitals there were marked differences.
When diagnosis is employed a similar pattern is obtained. At Menninger Hospital the
over one
percentage of patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia who were hospitalised
'
year was 91%. at Hillside Hospital 35% and at MMHC. 77o.
204

We

11:

'

factor not
generalizir

,

methodolog

There
single diag

sociopsych
difficulty.

5‘

‘

Studiii:

birth, edui

nificantly 1.
improvemc:
choanalyti&lt;-

tures - one
the other.

‘

�TABLE III
‘

RATINGS OF CLINICAL CONDITION AT TIME
OF HOSPITAL DISCHARGE

Hillside

Menninger

Improved
Unimproved
r.

MMHC

“'““”i“"‘

,-

«a..——q

SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT

,

"VT'~M-»

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

a.

waw

9.9.
«an::r:r;t?.'ﬁ~'"'ﬁ'f”“

o“

.

Improved

CHARACTER STRUCTURE

Moderately Improved
Slightly Improved '
‘

Unimproved

Improved
Unimproved

.

.v-‘n.

1

.

Unimproved

’

~

~VWT~I

Regression

SYNDROME

..
V

'

Complete Remission

””"1"

Improved

Unchanged (or worse)
a'v‘r‘.':'§l':"t'.“"""""""‘

TABLE IV

.

HOSPITAL STAY BY AGE
PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP
STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

A~-;

_-

Inf.)

.
.,i

~-

-‘

.a-.&lt;__.

u-

.,.I

Age

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

Below 20
20-29
30-39
40-49

81

42

14

73

36

6

61

30

6

30

20

0

50+

-_.-..-&lt;

vm

r
,

36

0

,

““*‘".'"‘-'-«rvm-AﬁuvnrcM-mvr“

V"

'

'

0

u‘

"rm-J'W-

V

12219122192
ﬂ."

j
J.“

~..

4....

We have indicated that the philosophy and organization of institutions is an essential
{actor not to be ignored in assessing observations and reports. Faced with the problem of

generalizing our findings, how do we overcome these institutional
methodological stumbling blocks to scientific activity?

‘.r‘a-..—..,._

differences that are the

«4“le

.-,...

a...

5“

-....

5hérv~naVvu

.--

a

.-.4

..

“4‘...

«a;

.v”

..

.

There is an urgent need for objective techniques to describe populations. The use of
diagnostic terms is obviously inadequate. It is likely that detailed behavioral and
sociopsychological descriptions of patients may be the best technique for overcoming this
single

«M-M~—,t...y.-.r,

difficulty.

Summary
Studies of the in-patient population of Hillside Hospital indicated that age, foreignbirth. education and stereotypic attitudes as measured by the California F Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hospitalization. discharge ratings of
improvement and diagnosis. We have extended this study to other institutions offering psychoanalytically-orientedpsychotherapy and somatic therapies with different social structures - one the Massachusetts Mental Health Center. serving "lower-class" patients and
the other, the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hospital. serving "upper-class" patients.
.

‘vvw-WOv—u-wm-Mvr-

.
ws—vt‘v-~.o-‘-

.-,.
'&lt;

'

205

u

r
~-.

.
.-

”4...”.-.

�,rm

We have encountered a variety of problems in this comparison. including difference.
in l) the type of hospital organization; 2) the definition of the treatment as in the designstion of which patients were receiving psychotherapy; 3) discharge rating systems of clinical
improvement; and 4) diagnostic "styles” employed.

.....

~.

a

.w»-._.r

..x

a

The importance of these methodological problems in current psychiatric research are
discussed.
References
(l) Hollingshead, A. B. , and Redlich, F. C.: Social Class and Mental Illness: A Commun.
ity Study. New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons. Inc. . l958.

a...»

.'

(Z)

Gallagher, E. B. : Levinson. D. J. , and Erlich, 1.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric Treatment, in The Patient
and the Mental Hospital. edited by M. Greenblatt, D.J. Levinson, and R. H. Williams,
Chicago. Free Press. 1957.

, Pollack, M. and Fink. M. : Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital. J. Hillside Hospital 6: 216-228, 1957.

(3) Kahn, R. L.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric
Treatment in A Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge
Ratings. and Diagnosis. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 1: 565-574. 1959.
(5) Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Neu. Ment. Dis.‘ 130: 189-192, 1960.
(4) Kahn, R.

(6)

Myers, J. K. , and Schaffer. L. : Social Stratification and Psychiatric Practice: AStudy
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev.l 19:307-310. 1954.

(7)

Pasamanick. B. , Dinitz. S. and Lefton. M. : Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to
Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat. . l_l_6_: 127-132. 1959.
DISCUSSION

DR. KLERMAN:

One of the ways to overcome the biasing factors related to length of stay is to calculate the mean stay for each hospital. In this way interhospital comparisons of the effect
of such variables as age on length of stay could be compared in terms of quartiles.

.
r

.4

g

DR. POLLACK:

.9101.

..

;v

That's a good suggestion, however it still doesn't overcome the problem of differences in hospital structure. e. g. , the presence or absence of a day hospital facilities. in
inﬂuencing length of hospital stay.

«2'

‘Z

uhwﬁﬁl'nl

DR. OPPENHEIM:

The finding that younger patients tended to stay longer at the hospital seemed to be at
variance with experience at VA Hospitals. I ask what was it about the therapeutic programs at the three hospitals that led to these findings? What are the theoretical implications of these findings ?

“AL.

in
\:A
9;.-

.41:

...,

s

——....-.-A..—

.-..~u-....v-l-~

.e...

“4...-..“

-.‘_......-c

DR. POLLACK:

The length of time a patient is hospitalized in a psychiatric facility is related to the
particular function and philosophy of the institution. In those hospitals that stress psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy, patients who are most like the therapists with regard
to sociopsychological factors are kept in treatment for the longest period.
In studies of
out-patient clinics with a psychoanalytic orientation, it has been found that persons from
higher social levels. as determined by education and income, are treated longer. In contrast. in state hospitals the results are quite different. Thus, it has been shown that state
hospital patients with the least education will be institutionalized longer and are more
likely to become the chronic patients. Consistent with the concept of state hospitals as
largely providing long-term custodial care for lower class patients, the state hospital
psychiatrist may be oriented toward a comparatively more'rapid discharge of those
patients who come from a background most like his own.

206

v"

.va

—v

:

��Social Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Hospitals:
Methodological Problems

Max

Pollack, Ph.D., Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D., and

Max

Fink, M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
ﬁos
Presented at the Sixth Annual Veterans Administration Research
Conference, March 28, 1961, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Aided, in part, by grant MY~2715 of the National Institute of
From

Mental Health; and the Nassau County Mental Health Board.
The cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully
acknowledged.
IV:

h/17/6l

�Social ASpects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Hospitals:
Methodological Problems

generalization of findings from one population to
another is basic to any science. Psychiatry, perhaps more
than other medical specialties, is plagued with controversies
concerning the non-reproducibility of results. One factor
responsible for this state is the failure of investigators to
adequately describe their populations and methods. The advent
The

of simultaneous multiple hOSpital studies makes possible the

detection and clarification of these methodological difficulties. We would like to describe some of the problems we
encountered in a recent tri-hospital study, and will consider
the variables of type of treatment, discharge diagnosis,

ratings of clinical improvement at time of discharge and
length of hospital stay.
Various social psychiatric studies of community and
heapital psychiatric populations (1, 2, 6) had established
the importance of sociopsychological factors in the type
and incidence of mental disorder, the selection and mainten—
ance of treatment and therapeutic evaluations.
previous studies such selective factors as the

In these

patient's

extent and type of available
treatment facilities may have been more significant in the
observed results than the social variables studied. A more

financial resources

or the

�-2-

critical test

sociopsychological factors in
treatment would be a study in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients,
regardless of their ability to pay. This requirement is not
at Hillside Hospital, and in 1957, we embarked on a program
of assaying the relation of sociopsychological factors to
the treatment of hospitalized psychiatric patients (3, h).
Each patient receives individual psychotherapy and by request
of his physician, somatotherapy (convulsive or psychopharmacological therapy). Almost all patients are non-chronic, as
their admission to the hospital is associated either with
first hospitalization or a recurrence of illness after a long
period of remission. The case load is small, with at most
ten patients to one resident physician.
Our method of

all

in—patients on
modified California

all patients.
birth,

role

of the

We

of

investigation was a census«type survey of
a given day (3). In addition a brief
F

Scale

observed

test

(2, 5) was administered to

that age, education, sex, foreign-

California F Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hOSpitalization, clinical discharge ratings and to clinical diagnosis.
In order to test the reliability of these findings, we
repeated this study at Hillside Hospital in 1958, employing
the same procedures and, concurrently extended it to two
other institutions, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital and
and performance on the

�-3the Massachusetts Mental Health Center

(MMHC).

These

insti-

tutions are similar to Hillside Hospital in that both
psychoanalytically - oriented psychotherapy and somatic
therapies are available. They were selected for the additional reason that one serves predominately socialogical Class I
and

II patients

and the

other, predominately Class

IV and V.

�-hOBSERVATIONS

Hospital Structure:
When

reporting data

from ones own

institution, the

structure of the hOSpital is taken for granted,

and

either

ignored or briefly mentioned. However, when approaching a
strange institution and attempting to gather comparable data
one is made aware of the differences in institutions and the
nature of the hospital organization is seen as one of the
methodologic problems affecting treatment. .Both the
Menninger
does

institutions

not. At the

MMHC

MMHC

and

hospital units, and Hillside
the treating physician can care for

have day

the same patient as an in-patient, in the day hOSpital, and
in the after-care clinic. In such a setting, the treating
doctor can discharge the patient from the hospital at an

earlier date, knowing that he will still be reSponsible for
his patient's care; whereas in Hillside Hospital discharge
termination of the patient—doctor relationship.
Another problem was the presence of different research
programs, affecting clinical routines. For example, at the
time of the survey, approximately twenty percent of the
patients at MMHC were chronically ill and had been hOSpitalized
for many years. Such a group would not normally have been in

means

this hospital but they

were

transferred

hOSpital for Special study purposes.

from another

state

�-5Designation of Type of Treatment:
In our assessments of specific variables, we encountered
a variety of problems associated with the content of hoSpital
records. For example, it was difficult to determine the
length of stay prior to referral for a somatic treatment, or
the length of time spent in that treatment. However, a
major problem was to learn which patients were receiving
psychotherapy. Our task was not to define psychotherapy,
but the much simpler problem of noting which patients were
designated by the hospital as having been treated with psychotherapy. At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was administered
on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the

patient was charged an additional fee. Sessions with the
psychiatric resident physician were considered part of routine
administrative patient care. At Hillside Hospital the definition of psychotherapy was limited to treatment sessions with
the psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not treat
patients directly, but restricted their activity to supervising the residents.
In contrast, at the MMHC psychotherapy was designated as
a function of many disciplines - psychiatric residents, nurses,
medical students, social workers and psychologists. To
ascertain whether or not a patient was receiving psychotherapy
we had to interview the resident physician in charge of the
case.

�Diagnosis:
The assessment of diagnosis was another problem area.

It

is not surprising that there are institutional diagnostic styles
which reflect staff orientations rather than the behavior of
the patient. Pasamanick and his associates (7) have shown that
diagnoses within the same institution are vulnerable to individual differences among examiners. In our present study,
there were differences in the terminology of the discharge
diagnosis. Discharge diagnoses at Menninger Hospital were
more descriptive and employed a multiple classification system.
Table I illustrates several examples and shows how we converted
these into more generic categories that could be applicable
to all three institutions. In reducing multiple diagnoses to
single generic ones, we are aware that we are introducing

distortions through this maneuver.

II illustrates the distribution of diagnositic
categories within each institution. Note that at the
Table

Menninger Hospital there was a lower incidence of diagnosed

schizophrenia and affective psychoses, while the diagnosis of
personality disorder exceeds by three and five-fold that found
in the other two hospitals.

�We

would emphasize

tions based

that cross hospital comparisons of popula-

diagnosis as the single or the most important
criterion does not insure comparability of populations.
on

Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Similar problems exist for the equivalence of global
ratings of improvement. As in the case of diagnosis,
Menninger HOSpital had the most elaborate discharge ratings
of improvement and Hillside Hospital, the simplest.
As shown in Table III the discharge rating at Menninger
Hospital was tripartite and a separate rating given for social,

characterological
had

and syndrome changes.

weight was

and

MMHC

it

is difficult to state how
given to each of the three factors incorpora-

similar global ratings and

much

Hillside

ted in the Menninger system. Such differences in systems
makes it difficult to compare treatment results of hospitaliza-

tion.

Hospitalization:
Length of hosPitalization for most illnesses, including
psychiatric disorders, commonly denotes both severity of

�-8-

illness

and response to

treatment.

As

such,

it

is frequently

interhospital comparison. Table IV
length of hospitalization by age at the time of the

used as an index for
compares

study. There was an observable relation between length of
stay and age within each institution, with age being inversely
related to length of hospitalization. Yet, among these three
hospitals there were marked differences.

diagnosis is employed a similar pattern is obtained.
At Menninger Hospital the percentage of patients with the
diagnosis of schizophrenia who were hospitalized over one
When

year was

91%,

at Hillside Hospital

35%

and

at

MMHC,

7%.

DISCUSSION

indicated that the philosophy and organization
of institutions is a factor not to be ignored in assessing
observations and reports. Faced with the problem of generalizing our findings, how do we overcome these institutional
differences that are the methodological stumbling blocks to
We

have

scientific activity?
is

for objective techniques to
describe populations. The use of single diagnostic terms is
obviously inadequate. It is possible that detailed behavioral
There

an urgent need

�-9sociopsychological descriptions of patients
best technique for overcoming this difficulty.
and

may be

the

�-10SUMMARY

Studies of the in~patient population of Hillside Hospital
indicated that age, foreign-birth, education and stereotypic
attitudes as measured by the California F Scale were signifi-

cantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hoSpitalization, discharge ratings of improvement and diagnosis. The
same therapeutic facilities were equally available to all
patients, predominantly middle-class, and ability to pay was
not a factor in treatment. We have extended this study to
Other institutions offering psychoanalytically-oriented
psychotherapy and somatic therapies with different social

structures -

one the Massachusetts Mental Health Center,

serving "lower-class" patients and the other, the C.F.
Menninger Memorial Hospital, serving "upper-class" patients.
We have encountered a variety of problems in this
comparison, including differences in: l) the type of
hospital organization; 2) the definition of the treatment
as in the designation of which patients were receiving
psychotherapy; 3) discharge rating systems of clinical
improvement; and h) diagnostic
The

"styles" employed.

importance of these methodological problems in

current psychiatric research are discussed.

�TABLE

I

TYPES OF DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS

PATIENT DISCHARGE RATING

CLASSIFICATION RATING

1. Depression Reaction

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

\2. Anxiety Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
3. Narcissistic Personality
h. Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
5. Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism
6.

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction

Schizo-Affective

Type

Psychoneurosis

Personality Trait Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

DISTRIBUTION OF DIAGNOSIS (PERCENTAGE)

Menninger

Hillside

MEEE

Schizophrenia
Personality Disorders

hl

52

S2

33

6

13

Psychoneuroses

1h

18

8

Affective Psychoses

5

21

16

Organic Psychoses

S

l

5

Transient Personality

2

2

6

100

173

93

Disorder

N =

�TABLE

III

RATINGS OF CLINICAL CONDITION AT TIME
OF

HOSPITAL DISCHARGE

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved
Unimproved
CHARACTER

STRUCTURE

Improved
Unimproved
SYNDROME

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Improved

Unimproved

Regression

�TABLE IV

HOSPITAL STAY BY AGE
PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Hillside

yﬁﬁg

Below 20

81

h2

lb

20-29

73

36

6

30-39

61

30

6

ho-h9

3o

20

0

50+

36

0

0

ggg_

�REFERENCES

Hollingshead, A.B., and Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and Mental
Illness: A Community Study, New York, Joha Wiley &amp; Sons,

Inc.,

1958.

Gallagher, E.B.: Levinson, D.J., and Erlich, Y.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics of Patients and Their
Relevance for Psychiatric Treatment, in Ehe Patient and the
Mental Hospital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D.J. Levinson,
and R.H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Factors in
Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Heepital.
J. Hillside Hospital é: 216-228, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis.
A.M.A. Arch. Gen.

Psychiat.

l:

565-57h, 1959.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude
(California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. Ment.

Kahn,

2i§.,

Egg: 189-192, 1960.

J.K., and Schaffer, L.: Social Stratification and
Psychiatric Practice: A Study of an Out-Patient Clinic,

Myers,

Sociol. Rev., 19: 307-310, 19Sh.
Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lofton, M.: Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a
Mental Hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, 1959.
Am.

��Mmunattm of Patton Populations:
Catapult-ability of 5mm 2!: Evaluating Thmpiu Mam Mutation!
The

Mam Fink. M.

From
A

the

D.

Miami Its-mat. of Ptycmuy at 8:.

Loans

sum Hospital. 8t.

Loni:

hand an and“. madman: at tho mum. nuptial. New York in
ramwith
Du. R. I... Kuhn. N. 310901 and M. Pollack, and tar be puhmhod

«Remnant

'smmyohtﬂoqtal Aspects at madman Truman m m mammary Hospitals“
uin 1863.

�Recent community studies have demonstrated a
between social factors and psychiatric treatment.

relationship
In their study

psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and
Redlich reported significant relationships between an individual's
position in the social class structure and the prevalence of treated
of the

New Haven

illness, types

of diagnosed disorders and kinds and duration of

psychiatric treatment administered (3). The influence of patient
economic status upon the availability of treating personnel, however,
was not excluded in these studies. To test the role of social
factors in the treatment of hospitalized patients independent of

patient's finances

and

availability of treatments,

undertaken at Hillside Hospital in 1957.

variety of treatment

In

a

survey was

this hospital,

a

including individual psychotherapy and
organic therapies are available to all patients regardless of their
ability to pay.
In the Hillside studies (h,5) it was observed that patients
hospitalized for the shortest period were the oldest, had the least
education and were most likely to have been foreign born. The older,
modes,

less educated patients were predominantly treated

by convulsive

therapy and received the more favorable discharge ratings. Younger,
native born and more educated patients were hospitalized the longest,

treated primarily

generally received the poorer
discharge ratings. The clinical factors were also related to a
measure of stereotypy, the California F Scale (1,6). Higher F
scores, i.e., greater stereotypy, were often found in patients
by psychotherapy and

�-2diagnosed as involutional psychosis

who were

referred for somatic

therapy, hospitalized for a shorter period, and more often were
rated as much improved or recovered.
Another hypothesis developed at this time was that differences
in various aSpects of psychiatric treatment among hospitals should
show the same relationship to social factors as noted within Hillside
Hospital. To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the
procedures of the 195? Hillside study in three institutions ~—

Hillside HOSpital, the C.F. Menninger

Memorial

Hospital of Topeka

the Massachusetts Mental Health Center of Boston. These institutions were selected with the expectation that they served patients
of different social classes. It was anticipated that in these
hospitals there would be a similarity in attitude towards treatment

and

and education.

is a teaching hospital with a full time superactive research departments. They emphasize

Each

visory staff and
psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy but provide other treatments such as somatic therapies and active programs of milieu therapy.
Each stresses short-term treatment of voluntary patients and does
not provide custodial care.
The specific aims of this study were to determine the population
characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social
class, age, education and F score: and to relate these characteristics
to the treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the institutions.

�-3METHOD

A

census of

institutions

all voluntary, adult patients in residence

in these

undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of
those at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned
by the courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic
was

schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a Specific
research project. These patients were excluded from the study
because of their non-voluntary status.

given the
California F scale on the census day. Eighteen months later the
records of discharged patients were examined to determine the social
and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of social class,
the Hollingshead 2~factor index - a weighted score of education and
occupation - was used (2). The study population consisted of 173

patients at Hillside,

100

at Menninger

Each

patient

and 95

was

at the Massachusetts

Mental Health Center.
The

study included examination of the relations of the social

to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as
between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult

however,

because of various methodological differences discussed below. These
difficulties were most marked in the intrahospital comparisons, and

accordingly, in the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will
be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
intrainstitutional trends. These difficulties also led to missing
information for some data, which is reflected in the varying
population sample sizes in the tables.

�4,.
RESULTS

A.

Inter-hospital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from a home institution, the
structure of the hospital is taken for granted and either ignored
or mentioned briefly. However, in studying a strange institution
and attempting to gather comparable data one is made aware of the
many differences between institutions. While we selected these
institutions as comparable in teaching, research and treatment programs, we found that they were unlike structurally in ways which
influenced the data of the study. Specific problems were noted in
the designation of type of treatment, diagnostic classes and the
evaluation of treatment outcome.
3) Designation of Type of Treatment: The criteria for designating that a patient received "psychotherapy" differed among the
institutions, making uniformity in classification difficult.
At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was designated as treatment
administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for
which the patient was charged a fee. Sessions with the psychiatric
resident were considered part of routine administrative patient care.
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with the psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did
not treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising
the resident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
When

�-5the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was
designated as a function of many disciplines -- psychiatric residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident in charge of each case.
b) Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles made
comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed the
multiple evaluative data scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric Association while both Hillside and MMHC followed unitary
At

systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed
in Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable
to that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortion.

Ratings of improvement at
the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The discharge
rating at Menninger HoSpital Was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside
Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global ratings
making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor of the
c) Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Menninger system (Table

II).

For

this study the Menninger

syndrome

�~6—

rating

was compared

to the global ratings of the other institutions.

----- ------Table

II

Sociopsychological Variables
The distribution of the variables of social class, age,
Jacation and California F Scale score among the three institutions
2.

is presented in Table III.

------------a) Social Class:

There was a marked difference in the

social

class composition of the three institutions. At Menninger Hospital
the population was predominantly upper class; at Hillside Hospital,

class;
lower class.

middle

b) age:

and

at Massachusetts Mental Health Center, predominantly

There were no differences in age

distribution in the

institutional populations.
c) Education: The populations differed in educational attain~
ment, with patients having more years of education at Menninger

Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center. While bl per
cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high school, only 32
per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger did not graduate.
d) F Score: Significant differences in the distribution of
scores on the California F Scale were observed. Fifty-one per cent

�-7of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per cent
with scores of 50 or above -- the higher F scores being associated
with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside thirtyone per

cent

of

the patients had

F

scores below 30 while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were below 30.
Thus, the anticipated differences in the social class of the
populations were observed, as well as significant differences in
educational attainment and performance on the F Scale. These differences permit testing the hypothesis concerning the relation of

sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables

among

the insti-

tutions.
3.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment:

Among

institutions, significant-

ly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (h3%) received somatic therapy
than at Hillside (6h%) or MMHC (68%) as shown in Table IV.
b) Duration of Hospitalization: The three institutions differed
markedly with respect to

patient's length

of stay (Table IV).

Hospital patients were hospitalized longest, with 65% of
patients remaining for twelve months or more, uumynugd to 31 per baht
of the Hillside patients and only 5 per cent of those at the
Massachusetts Mental Health center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation: In each hospital, most patients were
evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved" (Table IV). At
Menninger

�-9-

either none or fewer than five cases, thus not permitting a satisfactory intrahospital test of the hypothesis.
2. Intra-Hospital Comparison
With this methodological limitation some trends similar to
that found in the earlier study were observed, although few were of
statistical significance. With regard to selection of treatment,
for example, age and F score were found related at Menninger Hospital
(older and higher F score patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at
both the Menninger and Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients
remaining for the longest period. While such relationships were
significant in these two hospitals, a similar trend was noted at the
MMHC (Table V) where no
patients over ho, but lh% of patients under
the age of 20 remained longer than a year.
Table

V

-----------

�-10DISCUSSION

this

comparison of three voluntary

psychiatric hospitals we
have observed significant interinstitutional differences of patients
in the social variables of years of education and social class, but
not age: in distribution of California F Scale scores: and in each of
the treatment variables -- duration of hoSpitalization, selection of
treatments and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations.
The expectation that the institution serving upper class patients
In

the longest duration of stay,

higher proportion of
psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, lower
proportion of patients receiving organic forms of therapy, and poor-

would have

a

est discharge ratings were each confirmed. Similarly, the institution
serving lower class patients evinced shorter periods of hospitaliza—
tion, low proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and better dis—
V

charge evaluations.

It is

our impression

that these differences in psychiatric

treatment are more related to differences in staff attitudes than to
differences in population samples. The contrasts between institutions in duration of hospitalization are great, as are the complexity
of diagnostic formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of
psychotherapy, and the details and amount of recorded data. These
.stylistic differences cannot be dismissed as merely idiosyncratic
since they follow a pattern related to social differences consistent
with previous

findings.

�-11-

population and treatment variable relationships appear to
be interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff as by the constellation of
Such

history which

patient may present. Such relationships
will be most marked in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 343., where the objective criteria
symptoms or

a

defining diseases of known organic impairment are absent, as in
schizophrenia, psychoneurosis and personality and behavior disorders.
Under conditions of perceptual or situational ambiguity the observer's
attitudes and expectations become the basis for perception and classi~
fication. This view was clearly demonstrated by Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (7) in their study of variations in diagnosis within a
single institution. They observed that patients randomly assigned
to different wards did not differ in type of admission, marital
status, education, age or residence. Significant differences did
occur, however, in diagnoses among the three wards and among three
administrators on one ward. As it is highly unlikely that these
differences were inherent in the population, we believe they are
largely reflections of the attitudes of the examiners.
It is clear that many of the present psychiatric concepts of
diagnosis or clinical evaluation have relatively little meaning when
transferred from one institution to another. If these concepts are
taken literally the results become paradoxical. For example,
Menninger Hospital has the most highly trained personnel conducting
treatment, keeps its patients for the longest time and has fewest

�-12-

patients diagnosed as schizophrenia. And yet, despite these resources
and favorable factors, it reports the poorest treatment results. At
MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a therapist,
which keeps patients for the shortest periods, and which has a higher
proportion of the population classed asschizophrenia, the reported
treatment results are the best.

It is

probable that this study does not reflect the relative
therapeutic efficacy of the institutions. Our data furnishes no
independent criteria for determining which heapital provides the

better care; nor for assessing the comparability of the population
in the degree of

institution's

own

illness.

Since the evaluations are based on the
ratings, we believe that the differences reflect

variations in the criteria used for evaluation of improvement rather
than any intrinsic psychiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study (5) it was postulated that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons of different
social background. It was suggested that the higher the person's
social background the more complex the criteria employed. This has

literally confirmed in the present study, with Menninger's using
tripartite rating compared to the global rating of the other two

been
a

institutions.

considering the syndrome rating on which our
comparative statistical analysis were based, it is our contention
that for lower class persons we are apt to assess improvement in
relation to symptom relief or the patient's capacity to resume work,
while for upper class persbns the criteria stress such complex
Even

�~13-

intangibles as "developing insight", or "working through one's problems."
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the role of
social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been considerably
impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational leader-

ship and the expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly
defined. But the differences in institutional style making it difficult to obtain comparable data are important cues to the problem of
the conventional use of comparative statistics, especially in the

evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of discharge ratings,
diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria
in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable
populations are subject to considerable error unless the institutions
are clearly matched for social class patterns in patient population
and for staff attitudes and style. These difficulties may also extend
to the

failures of scientists to

confirm observations made in other

laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may be as much a reflection
of differences in populations and psychiatric criteria as to errors in
the original hypotheses. The widespread use of such terms as "schizo—
phrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore the changes in psychological
or biological features with mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative

results.

Even were a

valid observation to be

reported from one laboratory, we do not have methods available to
describe populations adequately to provide a sound confirmation.

�-111-

Increased attention must be paid to the methodological problems of
classifying subjects by "objective" criteria rather than the present
methods which appear to be so highly dependent on institutional and
observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the thera-

pist-patient interaction.

�-15..

SUMMARY

and

CONCLUSION

In three psychotherapeutic-oriented teaching hospitals,
population characteristics were related to treatment variables.
1.

Populations were defined by social class, age, education and F score,
and were related to type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diagnosis and discharge evaluation.

Significant interinstitutional differences were observed in
characteristics of patient social class, years of education and
distribution of California F scores, but not age.
3. The variations in treatment characteristics among institutions were found to be significantly different in the predicted
direction.
h. These variations in psychiatric practices follow a pattern
consistent with social class differences among institutions and are
not regarded as being idiosyncratic.
S. The differences in institutional style make comparisons of
diagnoses, duration of hospitalization, and treatment results between
2.

institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more objective
criteria of classification of populations is emphasized.

�REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,

R.N.:

Authoritarian Personality,

The

New

York, Harper

&amp;

Brothers,

1950.

Hollingshead, A.B.:
graphed

Two-Factor Index of Social Position, mimeo-

publication.

Hollingshead, A.B. and Redlich, F.C.:

Illness:

A

Community

Study,

New

Social Class and Mental

York, John Wiley

&amp;

Sons,

Inc.,

1958.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Factors in the
Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside
£332., 9: 216-228, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Kahn,

Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,
Arch. Gen.

Psychiat.,

l:

S65-57h, 1959.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis.,

Kahn,

130: 187-192, 1960.

Psychiatric Orienta—
tion and Its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital, Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, 1959.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M.:

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification
Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality

Alcoholism, Chronic

Infantile Personality

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Sociopathic Personality

Alcoholism

Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo-Affective

Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of
At Time of

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome
Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Clinical Condition

Hospital Discharge

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

1;;

InterhOSpital Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

Social

Class

'v“

N

(87)

(133)

I

31%

7%

(72)

3%

20

28

III

17

3h

13

IV

1

3h

28

v

o

5

28

x2=121.5; df=8z p&lt;.001
'N

(100)

(173)

(95)

19%

19%

15%

20-39

59

58

52

ho

22

23

33

+

x3=3.9; df=h; p=n.s.
(100)
(173)

&lt;12

Education

Center

'

51

N

Years of

Mental Health

I

II

&lt;20
Age

Hospital

Massachusetts

i

(91)

23%

32%

h1%

12-15

Sh

51

h9

16

23

17

10

+

v3=9.7; df=h; p&lt;.os
(92)

(163)

(76)

10~29

51%

33%

20%

30-h9

hl

50

50-70

8

N

F

Score

17

L

i
2

I

y3=39.2; df=hi p&lt;.001

38

h2

.

�TABLE IV

InterhOSpital Differences in Treatment Variables
‘Menninger

Hospital
(100)

N

Type

of

Treatment

Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health
(173)

Center
(89)

Psychotherapy

21%

36%

2b%

Somatic

h3

6h

68

Other

36

~-

8

1

e

a

_

_u

,

xi:82.8: df=h: p&lt;.001

N

Duration of

Hospitali—

zation

&lt;7

months

7-11 months

:il

months

(100)

(173)

(95)

22%

27%

67%

13

h?

27

65

31

S

a

’

X2=9o.6; df=h§ p&lt;.001‘
N

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation
.

Much

(99)

(172)

(88)

1%

23%

28%

Improved

80

62

61

Unimproved

19

15

10

lvwwy2=29.3; df=h; p&lt;.001

m“

N

Schizophrenia
Discharge
Diagnosis

”

Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

(95)

(171)

(85)

h3%

52%

5h%

5

22

17

52

26

29

,

X2=23-83 df=h; p&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization BX,A§2

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

£53

Menninger

Hillside

mag

Below 20

81

h2

1h

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

h0-h9

30

20

50+

36

�A?

9/7

.

THE AMERICAN PSYCHOANALYTIC ASSOCIATION
SUMMARY AND FINAL REPORT

OF
THE CENTRAL FACT-GATHERING COMMITTEE

/f"

’4-4-‘"?;"é

/L\

W2}

The Central Fact—Gathering Committee was established by this Association
in 1952 and charged with the responsibility Of setting up a method for pooling :the significant data of psychoanalytic practice. Starting modestly and testing a procedure
that ensured professional secrecy, it was hoped that increasingly valid, meaningful
data might be accumulated. However, the long-recognized difficulties -- diagnosis,
nomenclature and measure of effectiveness -- all have led to increasing resistance
and a resultant falling-Off in the number of completed questionnaires. Scarcely
any
reports are now being received.

Therefore, it was recommended at the last meeting of the Association that
this Committee be discharged and its materiel stored until such time as further developments warrant confidence in the use of the statistical method in psychoanalytic
validation.

\7

This summary of the material is being sent to you for your study and files.
Although some members of the Committee thought otherwise, the Committee as a
whole, the Executive Council and the membership at the last Business Meeting of
the Association in December, 1957 approved the opinion that none of this material be
published. It is not that the figures can be used to prove analytic therapy to be effective or ineffective, but that the material on which either opinion may be based is
inadequately established, and controversial publicity on such material cannot be of
benefit in any way. We trust that all will agree and will limit discussion of this

‘

material to those professionally qualified to recognize its serious limitations.

is divided into two sections: Part I, the summary of the material from the Initial Questionnaires, and Part II, of the material from the Final Questionnaires.
This summary

‘

PART I

We received a total Of about 10, 000 Initial Questionnaires and 3, 000 Final
Questionnaires, from about 800 participants. Of the 800, about 350 were members of
the then total membership of 530, and 450 were senior candidates of the then total
600 senior

candidates.

SUMMARY OF DATA FROM INITIAL QUESTIONNAIRES

1. Sex:

Male: 48%.

2. Race:

v“ "114’

or

i'TéIIW?“IMI—TNT

315' 51;; g L);
(“lgﬂﬂIPV
iﬂfﬂ uuunwﬂkz
”v,
jQihﬁjﬁyrf
HaAll. n F.
F7!

:~

,

,LCJHJE:
.

[2‘3

,_
rf'
355:3
_ ,

White: 99%.

Female: 52%.

(U.S. Census: White: 89%. Colored: 11%.)

�3.

Age 9;

patients:

Percentage of total

Up to 12 years:

2
2

13-18

14
48
27

19—25

26-35
36-45

‘

46 and over:

8

4. Highest educational level: 60% of all patients are at least college graduates.
(25% college graduates, 8% attended graduate school, and 27% more completed
(U.S.Census: 6% are college graduates.)
graduate schooll)
.

:

5. income:
1—5

.

%
%

‘
1

in analysis:
in psychotherapy:

22
35

U.S.Census:

71

6-10
25

(In thousands)

11-15

28

16
13

23

6

'

16-20

21-40

8

9

'

1

16

13

41.69
4
2

Over

560,303
3
Z

(over $10,000)

6. Previous treatment:
Regardless of type of diagnosis, about 1/ 6 or 1/7 of all patients had had previous
analysis. 1/3 of the cases of neuroses and 1/2 of the cases of psychoses had had
previous psychotherapy. Some had had both. About half of the cases of psychoses
had had previous psychiatric hospitalization, as did 1/10 of the cases of neurotic
reactions and character neuroses.

cases being re-analyzed (i.e. , 1/6 of all), only about 1/6 of them
are being re.analyzed by the previous analyst. The other 5/6 chose another
analyst .
Of the group of.

7. Present treatment:
54% Of all cases in treatment are listed as being in analysis, and 46% in psycho.
therapy. The percentage runs from 60-65% in analysis in the neuroses, to 40% in
analysis in the borderline cases, and 20% in the schiZOphrenias,

8. Place of treatment:
Private oﬁice: 94%. Out-patient clinics:
9

4%.

Psychiatric &amp; general hospital: 1%.

. {reguency of treatment:
%
%

in analysis:

in psychotherapy:

Per week:
1

2

3

4

5

1

6

29

41

20

7

42

33

13

3

6

or more

&lt; 2'
Q1

10. use of psychological projective tests:
The tests are reported as being carried out in approximately 25% of the cases. In
75% of the cases given psychological tests, the clinical diagnosis was in agree.
ment with the tests .

�II.

-3...

213929§§§

Initial diagnoses: The following diagnostic listings are presented with full appreciation of and emphasis on their inadequacy, invalidity, uncertainty and probable
insignificance. It reminds one of Freud's remarks when chided about the lack of
statistics in psychoanalysis, in 1913:
"To compile

statistics is at present impossible.

To begin with, we work with much

smaller numbers than most other doctors who devote so much less time to individuals. Then, the necessary uniformity is lacking which alone can form a basis of
any statistics. Should we really count together apples, peas, nuts? What do we

call a severe case? Moreover, technique changes and what about the numerous
partially analyzed cases and those whose treatment had to be discontinued for external reasons? "
ORDER OF FREQUENCY OF GROUPS OF DISORDERS

Psychoneuroses
Personality trait disturbances (character neuroses)
Per sonality pattern di sturba nce s (borderlines)
Psychotic reactions
Perversions
Addictions
All others
Psychosomatic disorders co-exi stent in:

_

Percent of total

.

39

33
1

l

9
5
2
1

11

'

ORDER OF FREQUENCY OF SPECIFIC DISORDERS

Pas sive-aggres sive personality
Compulsive personality, &amp; Anxiety reaction (each)

16
14

Depressive reaction

SchiZOphrenias
Phobic reaction, Obsessive-compulsive reaction,
personality (each)

Perversions
Conversion reaction,

9
7
&amp;

Schizoid

Emotionally unstable personality (each)
Dissociative reaction, Inadequate personality, Cyclothymic personality,
Paranoid personality, &amp; Addictions (each)
Paranoia, &amp; Manic—depressive reactions (each)
&amp;

Psychosomatic disorders co-existent in:
Some additional data: Of the neurotic

6
5
3
2
1

11

reactions, dissociative, conversion,

de—

pressive and phobic reactions were much more frequent to times more) in
females than in males . Obsessive-compulsive reactions were somewhat more
frequent in males than in females. The diagnosis of anxiety reaction was made
equally in males and females.
(2

3

diagnosis of borderline disorders, "schizoid", "paranoid", etc. , and of
schizophrenia was equally distributed between males and females. Homosexuality
was diagnosed two to three times as frequent in males as in females, as were the
other reported sexual deviations.
The

�We have received about 3, 000 Final Reports. These were on cases that had
been in treatment at the time the CFC- program began, or that began treatment thereafter. As it became increasingly evident that significant figures could not be obtained
because of the previous mentioned lack of uniformity, we confined our study 110 a more
intensive investigation of the neurotic reactions that had ”completed" treatment. We
cannot say what happened to all of the cases that were in treatment during this program,
because only about 1/3 to 1/4 of the cases were terminated during this period. The
following information from the Final Reports may be of interest.

sis,

We found that out of 595 cases of neurotic reactions which undertook analy-

306 were reported

as having been "completely analyzed”, that is, approximately
years. (W ere this study to be continued, this
figure might be higher, as there might be a larger percentage of longer analyses. However, it would not be lower.) Follow—up questionnaires were sent to the participants
who had sent in these 308 " completely analyzed" reports. We received a return of 210
replies, that is 70%. Below is a summary of the supplementary information on the
above Final Reports of "completely analyzed" cases of neurotic reactions:
50%, and the average duration was 3~4

Is there any doubt in your mind regarding the diagnosis?
Did you think there was an underlying psychosis at any time?
Had the patient been in analysis previously?
Was the patient in standard, or classical, analysis?
Of

28%
25%
18%

90%

these

"cured" cases.

45

Yes:
Yes:
Yes:
Yes:

210 supplementary questionnaires received, 80 were listed as
In 35 of these, all of the symptoms were reported as "cured", and in

residual symptoms remained.

In the 130 questionnaires received on "improved"

was moderate in

74

cases, great in 46, and slight in 10.

From the above, one might draw the conclusion

cases, the improvement

that about

97% of

patients

who undertake analysis for neurotic reactions and "complete" it, are "cured" or "improved" . Of the 50% who do not complete their analyses in this group of disorders,
about half discontinue apparently because they were improved. The other half discontinue for "external" reasons primarily, because they did not improve, or were consid—
ered untreatable, transferred to other analysts, or required hospitalization. The most
frequent reason given for discontinuing, apart from being improved, was " external

reasons".

�-5RESULTS IN COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF N EUROTIC REACTIONS

Final

In
Analysis
Reports Analysis Completed Cured Improved Unimproved

Anxiety reaction

-

‘

1,120 cases

335

183

90

35

52

3

70

38

26

11

15

0

cases

85

46

23

11

11

1

Phobic reaction
000-X04 - 500 cases

200

104

61

17

42

2

170

108

43

14

28

1

250

116

63

29

34

0

14110

595

306

117

182

7

50

37

6O

3

OOO-XOl

Dissociative reaction
OOO-XOZ - 175 cases
Conversion reaction
GOO-X03

-

250

Obsessive-compulsive

reaction

OOO-XOS

-

500

cases

Depressive reaction
000—X06

-

700

cases

TOTAL

Average Per Cent:

REPORTED RESULTS IN

Depressive Reactions
Total Final Reports:
In analysis:
Cured
Improved
Unimproved

000-X06

Compl‘d
29

34

Discont'd
30
7
4

Untreatable
Transferred
Hospitalized
External reasons
TOTAL

250
116

Anxiety Reactions
OOO-XOl

Phobic Reactions
000—X04

335
183

200
104

Compl'd Discont'd Compl'd Discont'd
35
52

43

42

12

3

9

2

4

1

7

5

2

7

1O

29

2
1

2
1

63

53

90

93

12

61

43

�-5REPORTED RESULTS IN

Obsessive-Compulsive
Total Final Reports
In analysis
Cured
Improved
Unimproved

Untreatable
Transferred
Hospitalized
External reasons
TOTAL

Reactions,

Compl'd
14
28

OOO-XOS

170
108

Disoont‘d

Cured
Improved
Unimproved

1

441
232

Disoont'd

31

72

0
5
8

2

22

Compulsive PersonalityJ 000-X53
365
237

Compl'd Discont'd
29
77

62

3

l7

4

4

10

10

2

37
135

11

43

65

OOO-XZI

Compl'd

X29

—

234
42

97

Schizoid Personality
000-X42

Disoont'd

4
3
2

*

Compl 'd
5

8
6
3
5

28

Homosexuality
000—X63

82

Disoont'd

l3
9

1

7
i

33

1

34

128

101

4
9

35

109

185

HOSpitalized
TOTAL

Compl'd

OOO-XSZ

6O

1

Untreatable
Transferred

External reasons

Personality,

23

Schiz0phrenia
Total Final Reports
In analysis

Passive—Aggressive

65

CompchL Disoont'd
8

13
1

1

6

10

4

3

3

5

2
8

9

48

22

43

Inall these eight reported cures of homosexuality, follow-up communications indicated assumption of full heterosexual roles and functioning.
*

Thinking it might be of some interest to gather the opinions and general experience of the membership on the expectation of results, the following questionnaire was submitted to the membership about a year ago:

"Given a young person, whom one could analyze four years or more, with
all conditions favorable, what would be your expectancy of result, in percentage, of cure, improvement and failure" -- for a list of neuroses, char—
acter disorders, schiZOphrenia, schizoid personality and homosexuality.
were the opinions:

We received 120 replies from the membership of about 650. These

�-71. 45% expected no cure in any of the conditions.
2. 35% expected a 50-100% cure in the neuroses, less in the character
3.

disorders, psychoses and perversions.
expected a 5~40% cure in the neuroses, less in the other con-

20%

ditions

.

those that expected no cure or a low percentage of cure, 50% expected moderate improvement, 45% great improvement, and 5% slight improvement. Of
those that expected some cures in the various condtions, the average expectancy of
cure was:
Of

. 50% in

anxiety, conversion and phobic reactions.
in dissociation, obsessional and depressive reactions.
in schizophrenia.
4. 20% in homosexuality.
1

2.
3.

33%
10%

If these figures are combined with the reports of those expecting
the
no cures,
percentage of cure would be about half, i.e. , 25% in anxiety cases and
phobias, 15% in dissociation, obsessional and depressive reactions, 5% in schizo—
phrenia, and

10%

in homosexuality.

Our "findings" suggest a higher percentage of ”cures" than the

above opinions. (Please note quotation marks!)

All of the foregoing have been presented before

closed meetings

of the Association and to a number of the societies. Details are available to those
members who request them. As Chairman of the Committee, I should like to thank the
members of the Committee, the membership, and the participating candidates for their
cooperation, advice and criticism.

Respectfully submitted,

HIW:as

1/5/58

Harry I. Weinstock, M.D.
Chairman
Central Fact—Gathering Committee

different times during the past five years the Committee has included: Drs. Leo H.'
Bartemeier, Roy R. Grinker, David Kairys, Lawrence C. Kolb, Lawrence S. Kubie,
Alfred O. Ludwig, Milton L. Miller, Milton Rosenbaum, and George W . Wilson, and
our consulting Statistician, Jack B. Chassan, Ph.D.
At

�Janusry 15; 19590
é

:9: Br. n. rink

art.

R.£. Kuhn and H. 51:111
sunancrs ﬁneiul Payehidtrxa study gt manningcr reuadntien,
3.3“,’ 5‘10. 1959‘

yuan:

arrived in rapuka rhmrudc ‘evnning, atnuary 7, ;nd
ut
tn. Paundttian nsrly t a nuxt sarning. Dr. Irving
rupcrtud
Kurt“: ta. Biractor of tho ﬁ.¥. Xanainqur Munorial Baupital,
.1 panel: zraaious and eaoparativa 1n urtry way. Eu bud
Ill
proyurod the stat: tad patients hatarahand in untiakput1an'at
var visit. 8t:f£ coapsrﬁtion at :11 1:101: wt: oxealltnt.
rhnrn In: guaninc intsrcst in car :tudy and us had intnrusl
Wu

dincuaaiana with maths»: of tho

stati.

Br. Kurtuu Int us ans hi! 05:13: us

air

handgunrtcra In&amp;

and. nrrnnaauunﬂs tnr um kt lﬁﬁﬁrﬁ :11 nppoin$n¢ntc and obtain
‘11 rouardn ind ropcrtn that I: ﬁliirtdu Przar ta «at again;
had tskud a: ta pruvidc him with ma iuiaruﬁtion uncut
I.
indinntin: I11 tun rocord data uttdiﬁ for nut thudy. the
nonienl runawaulibrtrinn and he: auatntuat Iptnt fair 6‘}!
conp1¢$1ng taut. turn: ta dotnil. siuau sat: a! thin inturuatian
was net raudtly avuiltblu in tho ehtrﬁs, ﬁr. xtrtnu aunt t for:
to all t». stat: «twist. in ob$u1n thin inxﬁrnnticn chart noqdnd.
It w¢n1a havc takuu a: pnrh¢pl two nugka ta obtain :11.thu rneard

intornﬁttan aurlclv¢t.

ways.

Thu

a»

“

the patiunts It! caninotud in two
Iatull tasting of
60
worn aollantaé 1n the
tharaday ubaut
pttiantt
$ha
on
and

t¢utod an aging.
:yuanuinn
rlnuinlng attiﬁutu
Pridny,
tautcd indiviaunlly in thtir
reams. baring the Friday tcnting
tart
a uﬂgtr nurt¢ nacnuytuiod at 3% all tinnt.ha that as short the
various putauuta warn locatad and ta intradusu us ts Glah puticnt.
Br. Kartun yartiaipatad in tha udniniutraﬁioa at thg test an the
dinturhad ward and gran It?! 1% ta a to: pittantn himself.
Arrangancntu atrn undo tar tho raeaxﬂulihwnriun ta sand
an tau disahnrxc data can: a manta during ﬁhu next ynnr.
an sgtarday neruxng, priar ta war dapnrturq, a: disuuaaod
with m. 031‘an Murphy, Br. allay Gardner
”lurch
tad Br. Rahart wallontttan. In tddi$1mn, aw dinunnnad garnet:
z! ta: «linieal prusrnn with Dru. Rorbnrt auhlguingcr and Philip

“that”

“lﬁ‘ﬁnn

or our Viuit thanks
ortry objectiva
to tha oxtrauraxntry eaaporttion a: tan manningar atntt,
partinnlnrly Br. x;rtns. tun ltr¢et0r at tho huipxtnl and Eva.
tauntu, thc modicul ruacrau 13hrnr1an. Ehuy war. ‘11 nuts
xraaiaully httpitnblc and and. “a I‘ll-vulcanu and ut hunt.
In unitary

V0

uehiovod

,

3&amp;1143

�7‘,

-.

nay-u

JIRU‘VV

1%:
FRQH:

Br. a. link

art.

svnaxata

ﬁ¢L. Kuhn and

I.

15; 1959;

5103:!

antatl Ptrahiuhria study

Jlnuury 5‘10; 1959*

uﬁ

nhnninsar-rvunégtiqn.

a. arrivad in Tapaku Ehnrtdu atoning, January 7, and
rqpurttd ut tau runndnttun curly' a ncxt attains. Br. Irving
Itrtus ta: Biruetar of ﬁn. 6.3. thningar Hanurinl Balpitnl,
was cx%rnmu1y grngiuuu mad weapcrntivn in OVQ?’ may. 30 haﬂ
yrtynrtd sh: stuff gnu pat$nnt¢ butarokund an tnttaipntian ct
an? vilit. ﬁturt aunyaratiaa at I11 Ivvalu in» axaalloat.
tag». it: cnnutne inturast in an: Iﬁuty luﬂ a: hlﬂ tatarnal
dinausttvnn with unabcrn o: tha staff.
ﬁr. Kurtu: Int an nﬁo h1¢ oxttac I! an: hundquartorl aha
and. arraugnnnnsa In: up %n tantra n11 uppaintncnts and abiain
:11 rtearéu and ropnrtn that u: dusivgd.. trig? ta but G§I$ﬁ8
ha had ankud.uu tn pruvidn bin with an iniurnntiun nhutt
inﬁiotting n11 tun rianvd alt: uoaéod tar mar ntndy. 2h:
uptuﬁ :01: any:
nudietl racirdnlibrnrinu and haw aasiat3nt
«unwitting thcua turn: in datnil. $1300 can: 0: this information
was nut ra:d£1y artil‘blc in sh. ahsrtc, nr‘ Rattan goat u tar:
£9 :11 thc atatt dactarn ta abtuan than internatiun want. aci¢ad.
I$~Vﬂﬂlﬁ hava ﬁakan 1‘ yarhupa tun wash: to obtain all tho roaord
information ourscvaaa
the aatual tuttinc at thu‘pnticntc wan gnuaucttd an in:
nnyu. an fluvial: ukout 60 pntacntn vars eelltutaé in th.
gylanpiun tag tpntoa gm amass. .an rrtany, «a; rcxnining'puttaatu
thy wridty touting
var. tantné ludtvadunlly in that: ragga. ﬂaring
saaw
$0
no they. in:
taunt
ﬁt
neuonpnaicﬁ
as
all
I uttti aura.
variant patiuutl wart lﬁﬂltid qua to intraduau as to naah patient.
Br. tartan partiaipntgd in Eh. téuiniatrution at thp tun! an tbs
diatarbod ward and gran ggvc at ta a In: pntiantl hinant.
Arringauantt wart ugd¢ tor tho rgeerdtlihrnritn ta 30nd
In the dinahlrxa data «an: a lauth ﬁuring thu nmxt ymar.
on antardny-morniux. print ta gar d¢purtnrc nu digcuuand
rtactr¢b nativitlna with nr.0%x§mma'nurphy, Br. £11.: euranar
aaa 9r. iﬂhltt waxlumataia. In .dditiau, I. dinuuaaca anptati
giltho ulinietl procran with Dru. Earhart achltaiagtr tad ﬁhilip
‘ﬁﬂﬂﬂa

In summary it anhicvnd_tvury ahagat1Vt or an: viast thunk:
ta th: axtrtorainury anuparatgan g: tho Hunnincsr utatt,
and Era.
pnrtioulurly Br. Knrﬁmt. in: ﬂirtator a! :5. hospital moa£
$3:
wart
rhuy
nodisul-rnaorﬁs
all
librartua.
xntntu,
[racinuuly hatyttgblt and and. In Incl tblaﬂlﬁ and at boat.
ILK:JB

��wwwmgunm
ﬁummﬁmmmhmmhwbmlw
mswm‘mwmmmwwwmnwmw

2mm

“WgLoW

numm

�Jun! 17’ 1959;

Dr. Hilton Graanblatt,

Haosachusetta Hontal Health Cantor,
72-7h Fonsood Road,
Boston, 15, lane.
Dear

Kilt:

I want to take thio opportunity to
parsonally thank you and your Staff for the
excellont cooperation shown the Billoide workers
during their racont visit. They returned laden
with considerable data and enthusiastic about
the spirit and onthuaiasa manifested by your
Staff. I an aoot grateful for your oooporation.

/

sincerely yours,
,

,.

éox Fink, H.D.

foJB

�����Q4:

mmmnwm:mun.nm:mmw
mamas
'

"

wMMummuanmmu
_gm“, Mm.

uuuwuﬁumnmuumazr-

hunt“.

"

“mama. 7pm.; mm
«m,
a gm mm m mm:
'

V»4,.ﬁ,_,§.,..r*

3.

Age" A

tu

Miamiwnuanhmmummumh‘

��1/”
[W
W
J7

fké,

fax»:

.7

.2

=_7

adv/O

gala; ,Afuuzs

a CH“;

;

NV/
g
xY/

A

A3

/

‘3~*‘~/7::¢4

-

ls-

925“
'0’?

4a

9

09%

W [W751

13.9140

4

dew/9,567

)

M42

ﬂF/ﬁf.

J adeN‘

&gt;

.7

Fm”.

MM
5% F

A?”

ﬂu—

ﬁnk. fut.

#mmduiui’

Fay: Q.

�APR 5

I!!!
HOSPITAL

1. nillnidt
2. nonningar
3. Hnn¢* nautil

2,3,k.

PATIENT HUMBER

5.

SE:

6,7.

AGE

Ectlth

1. Kilo
a. Funnio

--,
on.

Exact

no

Ago
,

intnrn;ti¢n

RAGE

1. Whit.

Euro
0th.:0. la inrornntien
2.

3.

RILIGIGH

1. Pratauttnt
2. c;thalie
3. J¢ n
09. in“ r nu inxorattion

10.

szArua‘

KARIYAL

1. Bingld
2. marriud
3. separated
h. Divorecd
5. Widow‘d
6.

la intaruttioa

anueArIol
1. l¢n¢
2. 1~6 yuarn
3. 7

h, .

a

s 9’11

‘

o

6 . 12
7t

13-15

a . 16

9 . 17*

e . nu

internatiaa

uma

�«.2...

12.

PLACE

1.

2.

0! 31313

USA

reroitn tern: lagliah Bpatking

'
'

3.
h.
5.
6.
7.
8.

o.
13.

21‘38

1.
2.

3c
.
gammy

‘

‘
9‘-

F‘

O
C‘

U
amrunwb

4t

O

.
“”6

o‘

u

90

0.

15,/9

n

*

'

"

I

u
*

*

ﬁ

:
x

H

I

t
I
1

countricl

Girntnia &amp; Scandiuu
tvinn
Ittly
Prune. &amp; aplin
slavie natiaun
Latin Ancriet
ethnr
In internation

I! 9.5.A.

lativv beta
Lap: thua
1*h

1

S~9

10~19

29.29
30+

30

infatuation

69

at

79»?!
89-69

1...

90~99
16¢~199
110~119
120~12y

1 0‘13?
1 0*

Ia intarmation

163 A? FIRE! PSYCHIATRIC 363156!
-.. lxaet Ag.

inrornltion
PATIEIT'S sachL CLASS
1. 61:” 1
2. class 2
00“ He

3o

01".

h. 81:”
§.v 91:0: 5
9. 5113301“!
IBHIIR

:

OF PRIOR HOﬁPITALIﬁATIONB
«a

murmur-i

9.
0.

«I

8*

Ho

intomuntion

�.3...
TOTAL PERIOD OF PRIOR

xxrxnxxxczs
Lola than 1 nonth
1-5 not.
6’11 ‘0. t

HOﬁPITAL

1.
2.
3.

h.
5.
6.
7.

‘Ow

0.

12~17

not.

1%-23 “58¢

2h~35 non.
36-h? mac.
h3~59 ”0‘.
5+

No

year:
internation

COHDITION A? DISCHARGE

2.
3.

Hueh‘inprovod; rocovarod
Inprovod
Unchangod or Ilightly wort.

o.

Ho

1.

a.

Docctncd

informatien

913081861

OR

DIAGH0313

l.
2.

ESTABLISHED

Psyahauis: Schiaephrcnic reaction
Paychenia: Afroetiva rotations

3. Payeheniﬁz

Dynamic

h. Paychonnurotie Bisordcr
5. Pornonulity Dinardnr

6‘ Transient Situational Peranality
ls
0 Ha inlermatian
General
Paychothornpy
30?

TREATMEHT:

+3
no

internatian

TREtTEEﬁTT
IRELTHEBT:

1.
2.

easia#¢——

Psychotherapy
Payeheanulyais
Paychethnrapy: ”.9.
Psychethortpyc 0th.:
Gran; Thcrnpy

Unlpoaiticd
Ho

psy¢hethorapy

lo infatuatien

�“aTREATMENT:

1.

2.

Hoprob., dopral, oqunnil

h.

1 + 2
1 + 3
2 + 3
1 + 2 + 3

3.

S.

6.
7.

8.

29/

ORGANIG

Phonothyaninou (OP,P,Tr11

9

C

O

O

Tafranil

Gthor

organic trcatunnt

Ne

intermatian

Ho

LENGTH 6F HOSPITALIZATION
BEFORE GRGAHIC TREATMENT

Lo:a than

t‘
11- 2

M?“

weeks

menths

k'

5:6

78
9-10

omwmmru

1 waak

u

"
"

11 + months

No

25.

infcrmation

LE GTE OF CURRENT HOSPITALIZATIE
Under 1 menth
t
v-

t
o
wmwmmrwmwu

I

2
3

manths

months
h-S manths
6 months
7~8 months

9-11 month:
12 month:

(1‘.

2?, 2-

.

.‘

13+ months

No

informtticn

"F"

SCORE
—-. a exact

00.

~

Ha

scorn

information

)

�0

\, $550014’o

s 0%
'P

~_/”‘

A

§

PA-

N A M H

G H

‘1”

a

f

‘64,

.

,
'_

«a

V

’4L Raﬁ»

Psychiatric

Group

Association for

Health
Insurance Inc.

Mental Health

Association

PROJECT SPRINO7-6000. Ext. 399

RESEARCH
22' FOURTH AVNUE.

NEW VORK3N.V-

(Invettigation Into the Insumbility 0f Pch/aiatric Treatments)

Helen H. Avnet, Proiect Director

November 28,

ADVISORY COMMITTEE

l 960

Harvey J. Tompkins, M.D.
CHAIRMAN

lea

Perlis
VICE-CHAIRMAN

A. Oakley Brooks
Martin Cherkasky, MD.
John M. Cotton, M.D.
Jack Elinson, Ph.D.
Sylvan s. Furman
David Goldstein, MD.
Clarkson Hill
Paul H_ ”och, M.D.
William A. Horwitz, M.D.
Lothar B. Kalinowsky, M.D.
Mack Lipkin, M.D.
Henry B. Makover, M.D.
Martin E. Segal
Leo Srole, Ph.D.

Partic£9ating PSYChiatri-Sts

FROM:

Harvey
P

J.

Tompkins ,

M. D.

and John

M.

Cotton,

1...;

Participating

Psychiatrists, the Project, covering a sample group
Of 76’ 000 Persons’ has been
operating satiSfaCtorll-y
Since July 1,1959

HarrYl.Weinstock,M.D.
Bernard Wortis,M.D.

Attached

msma

is

a

report

pating psychiatrists,

REPRESENTATIVE COMMITTEE

Int erest 1‘18-

MANHATTAN:

John M. Cotton, M.D.
CHAIRMAN

An

on our survey of particithink you will find

Which we

address recently

made by

ArthurHH. Harlow, Jr.

PrESident of Group Health Insurance, Inc., on the first,
year' 5 experience under the Project, will be summarized
in the December issue of the Bulletin of the New York
State District Branches of the American Psychiatric

KINGS:

Morton H. Hand, M.D.

BRONX,

Jacobo. S-Jaeger,M.D.

QUEENS:

ArthurW.Schappe|l,M.D.

Association.

NASSAU:

Irving Chipkin, M.D.

If

SUFFOLK:

Robert Wagner, M.D.
WESTCHESTER:

Miltiades Zaphiropoulos, MD.

write us
r equ est.

you would like additional information please
and we will be happy to comply with your

NEw JERSEY:
David Flicker, M.D.

DEPARTMENT
EXPERiﬁ'l {ﬁlial

or

”ii

PSYEW

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS.N

NOVZ 31960

M. D.

sycuratric Research Pro;. ect

Thanks to the cooperation of our

S.

APA

T02

SUBJECT ..

.

.

National

American

I

1

ulna! Illness (3

Me

Financed by National Institute of Mental Health and Group Health Insurance, Inc.

�QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF PARTICIPAIING PSYCHIATRISTS

possible aid in the eventual evaluation of results of treating Project
professional qualifications and customs of
participating psychiatrists.
As a

cases, a survey was conducted on the

age, sex, and

for

participants,

returned questionnaires. In addition, data on
qualifications were obtained from the latest medical directories
of the non-reSpondents.

Of 1150

many

1008

In order to encourage the broadest possible response, the questionnaire was
limited to one page with a dozen questions in all, mostly check-offs, and with
space provided for comments.

are:

From

the Project's point of View, the most important findings of the survey

(1) The great majority of participating psychiatrists are well
qualified, judging by accepted standards in the field.
(2) Over three-quarters of participants regard themselves as
primarily analytically and psychologically oriented in their approach
to treatment.

‘

é‘EX, AGE;.,L9.CATION

- (Tables

1

- 3)

More than half the participants are between 35 and 49
years of age. About
every tenth participant is a woman. The majority practice in Manhattan, although
the suburbs are fairly well represented.
TABLE 1

—

SEX OFﬂgAgILQIPATING

PSYCHIATR;§1§#

Male
Female
TABLE 2

-

AGE

1001 (88 per
138 (12 per

cent)
cent)

Dl§IgIBUTION
Age Group‘

Egmbgr

28-34

187
204
144
224
168
99

35-39
40-44

45~49

50-54
55-59
65

60-64
and over

Total
*excludes those who have resigned or

in Group

71

42

1139*
who

have died

ger Cent of Total
16.4
17.9
12.6
19.7
14.8
8.7

6.2
3.7

100.0

�Page 2.
- AREA OF PRACTICE

TABLE 3

Number

Area
Manhattan
Brooklyn

in Area

Per Cent of Total
57.0

649
98

8.6
5.2
1.9

59

Queens
Bronx

22

Staten Island
New Jersey

.4

5

6.4

73

7.0

79

Nassau

Suffolk

4.3
5.8

49

Westchester

66
16

Rockland

Other

Total

~23

1.4
2.0

1139

100.0

TYPE OF PRACTICE

participants confine their practice to hosPital work. The majority
Forty-three per cent treat only in the
treat
office, referring their hospital cases to colleagues.
Seven out of ten answering this question (1000) report that they also do
out-patient clinic work.
Only 17

both office and hospital patients.

QUALIFICATIONS

Of 1096

either

participants for

whom

information is available,

cent are

85 per

Diplomates of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology or are ”Board

per cent are qualified as psychiatrists, with an ”SI"
rating, under the New York State Workmen's Compensation law. 0f the remaining
13 per cent, 6 per cent are accredited as psychiatrists by the New York State
Department of Mental Hygiet e, with the "QP" rating, and 7 per cent meet the quali—
fications for membership in the American Psychiatric Association.

eligible." Another

Table 4 shows
TABLE

two

this over-all distribution,

and Table

5

breaks

it

down by age:

4 - QUALIFICATIONS

DPN*
DPN

‘

.

Number

Per Cent

Cumulative Per Cent

585

53. 4
31. 8
2.1

53.4
85.2
87.3

7.1

100.0

eligibility only* 349
23
SI rating only**
61
QP rating only***
78
APA membership only
Total

Known

1096

5.6

9239

100.0

*Diplomate, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology
**Qualified as psychiatrist under New York State Workmen' 3 Compensation Law
"
"
***
by New York State Department of Mental Hygiene
-

�TABLE 5

- QUALIFICATIONS

Page 3.

AND AGE

Per Cent of Age Group with
Boards or Eligibility SI Rating Only

Age Group

28-34

90

40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59

89
-

60-64
65 and over

'All Groups (Total Reporting1096)

*less than

1

*
*

80

35—39

2

87
90

3

86

2

71

68

8
10

85

2

*

per cent

ORIENTATION

invitations to participate in the Project were issued, reasons for nonparticipation were also solicited. Most refusals were based on the practitioner's
analytic orientation: The 15 sessions provided by the Project were felt to be far
from adequate in terms of the respondent's usual ”A-P” (analytic and psychological)
When

approach to treatment.

Since the "D-0" (directive—organic) and eclectic practitioners were more apt
to be optimistic about the effectiveness of short-term therapy, there seemed a
possibility that enrollment from these groups might dominate the list of participants.
This theory was effectively demolished by the survey. Of over 1000 respondents, 77 per cent checked ”analytical and psychological” as their primary orientation, 10 per cent checked "directive and organic,” and 13 per cent checked "other",
usually specifying "both” or a combination of the other two such as "organic and

psychological.”

Although the majority with the primary A-P orientation exists at every age
level, it becomes less of a majority with each age increment, so that what starts
out as a 92 per cent A-P orientation, in the youngest group, comes down to a 53
per cent A-P orientation in the over-60 group, as shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6

-

PRIMARY ORIENTATION AND AGE

.

Age Group

Per Cent of Each Age Group with Specified Primary Orientation
Other
A-P
D-O
Combination

28-34
35~39

92
89

2

3

40-44

85

3.

50-54
55-59
60 and over

76
61

10
21

45~49

All Groups(Total
Reporting 1002)

6
8
12

53

25

14
18
23
22

77%

10%

13%

59

18

�Page 4.
A primary orientation toward one approach does not of course mean that an
individual will always use that approach. A psychiatrist who is primarily A—P
oriented may use organic approaches on occasion, as shown below.

ATTITUDES

TOWARD

DRUGS,gSHOCK THERAPY, GROUP THERAPY

Drugs appear to be almost a

universal tool

among

psychiatrists

(98

per cent).

0n shock therapy and group therapy, there were far fewer answers, and it is
impossible to evaluate whether a non-response indicates a negative attitude or an
oversight. But a comparison of the number responding to each question may in itself
be indicative to some extent of the degree of acceptance achieved by each method of
treatment. The total responses and the percentage of affirmative answers follow:

Total

QEEEEEQE
Do

"
H

you
"

drugs?
prescribe
”

I!

Per Cent Affirmative
98

952
693

shock therapy?
group therapy?

H

Number of Answers

75

51

69".

A cross-tabulation of the answers to these questions with the primary practice
orientation of the respondent shows that the use of drugs and shock treatment is not
a distinguishing characteristic of any group, although the non-A-P's are much more

apt to

recommend shock

therapy than their colleagues.

- PERCENTAGE OF REPORTING PSYCHIATRISTS

TABLE 7

AND GROUP

WHO PRESCRIBE SHOCK THERAPY, DRUGS,
THERAPY, BY PRACTICE ORIENTATION

Per Cent of Each Orientation Who Prescribe -

Practice Orientation

Shock Therapy
68

A—P

D-O

92
90

Combination

Drugs

Group Therapy

100
100

50

54
34

97

There appears to be no dearth of personnel ready to administer shock therapy
this) or to conduct group therapy (208 checked this).

(247 checked
FEES
A

question was asked as to differentiation between fees for initial consultatior
Of 981 respondents, 45 per cent do differentiate, 55 per cent do not.

and treatment.
The

question as to the respondent's usual fee for a private office session

brought 987 responses, of which 789 were explicit, 198 stated a range. In other
words, 20 per cent of the respondents do not have a set fee. For most of these, the
range indicated was either $15-$20 or $20-$25, but there were instances of a twentydollar spread in the usual fee - e.g.,"$lS-$35" or"$30—$50".
For those

stating

a

definite usual fee, the distribution is as follows:

Usual Fee

$15
$20
$25
$30 or more

Per Cent Charging
11

49
36
4

�Addendum:
PSYCHIATRISTS

AND THE OPERATION

OF THE PROJECT

Because of the enthusiastic response of psychiatrists to the Project, one of the
disappointments of the first year's Operations was the relatively small number who
actually saw a Project patient - fewer than a third of the participating psychiatrists.
This includes cases treated by more than one psychiatrist, and multiple cases in the
same family (usually treated by the same psychiatrist). The number of psychiatrists
and patients* seen by each was as follows:
Number of

Psychiatrists

Number of

201

1

Each

1

63
21
15
8

4

Patients
2

3

4
5
6

each

7 ,8,9,10,11

*Excluding cases having hospital care only.

Psychiatrists having a
in relatively short supply.

number of

cases are usually child psychiatrists,

who

are

all participating psychiatrists, the psychiatrists who treated
on the whole somewhat better qualified (91% vs 87% having Boards
eligibility) and somewhat less primarily A~P oriented (67% vs 77%). The

Compared with
Project cases were

or Board

treatment. they rendered was mostly individual office psychotherapy. Four per cent
of the cases were hospitalized; seven per cent received shock therapy (including
hos—
pital cases); three per cent received group therapy; seven per cent received psychological testing. Ig_thi£ty-five per cent of the office
drugs were prescribed
at one time or another during the course of treatment. cases,
0n the basis of the few (36) Project cases treated by two or more doctors, it
would appear that psychiatrists are rarely in exact
agreement about the diagnosis of
a particular case. In 12 cases there was a basic difference as to the severity of the
condition, with one doctor calling it a psychosis, the other something less severe.
In four additional cases there was a difference as to major category (usually neurosis
or personality disorder). In another six, there was a partial
difference as to major
category, with one doctor calling it a mixed diagnosis; and in another 9, there was

agreement as to major category but differences appeared in the sub-categories.
cases there were identical diagnoses in 5.

36

Out of

Another demonstration of the individuality of
psychiatrists emerged during
attempts to classify frequency of treatment under the Project. Although six specific
classifications were available for coding purposes, 42 per cent of the cases fell into
the ”other” or non-classifiable category. Pursuit of this led to a fascinating variety of frequencies of individual office visits, each adding up to exactly 15 visits
(the Project limit). There are combinations extending from two months (6 visits one
month, 9 the next), to seven months (4,1,2,2,2,3,1; or
and in between
come all sorts of combinations spreading the visits overl,5,4,2,l,1,1),
3 or 4 or 5 or 6 months.

far as is

to the Project administration, there has been a negligible
unfair advantage of the
Certain difficulties inevitably arise with thbse who do not read their mail orplan.
and there
instructions,
are occasional misunderstandings resulting from patients belatedly identifying them—
selves as Project-eligible. As far as can be determined, broken appointments are not
a serious source of difficulty. In general, the Project has generated the enthusiasm
and cooperation which sometimes characterize pioneering ventures.
So

known

amount of abuse, or attempts to take

GHI’APA—NAMH RESEARCH PROJECT

(for the period 7/1/59~6/30/60)

�I:

12/26/60

Social Glaxo, Diognooio, ond Irootnoht
In Throo Psychiotrio Hospital:
In 1958, Bolliugohood and Rodlioh pahliohod on

influontiol voloto, (1); in
ohipn botvoon

mat

it

tho: roportOd roiotion-

social class) diognooio, tad tho troot-

or loan]. dioordon.

and Pink (2)

which

During 1958, Kohn, Pout ok

roportod studill

tt

not lhOﬂn that who: oduootioh

or oooiol slain,

Hilllido Hoopitol vhoro
woo

it It! roiotod to

toad

who

on

to iodox

on: rotorrod for

convulsivo thoropy, one to tho thoropoutic rouponto to

this trootnont inotrunont.
Tho

Bollinglhood ohd Rodlioh study

It:

oorriod out

bororo tho oo-oullod 'tronquili:inz“ drugs oohiovod wido

populority.
thoropy
ooooo

oloo

demo

Tho Kohn,

at a facility,

woo

hood.

roportod, for CSﬂIplﬂg thot drug

tho prinéipol thoropy in only b.31 of tho

tho: otudiod.;

thoropy
won

it:

It won

whoro

Pollock o rink study

woo

ot tho tino, oonvultivo

tho major organic thorlpoutio dovioo which

�i3Tvvor the heepitele were well
The

third

was

the research hospital of a state hospital

system etteohed to e

its ﬁetiente

private facilities.

known

university medical center. Heat of

were voluntary ednieeionl.

Each of

the

heepitele were peyohoenelytieelly oriented

and each

institution maintained affiliations with

local analytic

institute.

The

hospitals

were

loceted reepectively in the

aid-West. Riddle Atlantic, and
The

queetioee

we

e

New

England.

wished to answer in

relation to

social classes for the different hospital settings were:
(1) What is the relation of patient social class to

(a) diagnosis, (b) treatment, and (o) length of
he

(2)

hospitalisation.
For these varieties, are there differences between

heepitele vhioh treat different

model

close groups?

Pppuletion a Hethodolegy:
During the Winter 1958~1959, e research team
each of the three

hospitals.

population of each hoapitﬂ.

The
who

visited

total adult in~petient

were

hospitalized

on

�~11»

voluntary cartitieatan
day.

Each

patient

word

was then

at hi: hospitalizatien

on

studied in a given viaitatioh
followed through the course

and information

regarding his

treatmant, langth of hospitalization and discharge status
was

appended

xjﬁlxiai to tha data ahaata for each patient studiad.

All patients discharged tron this hoapital within aightaan
months

after the study

began, were indluded in the sample.

This included approximately minty per cent of the

originally studied. Eollingahead
position
and

was emphasised which

aducational scores.

farred to

it

two

factor index of social

utilizes

Data for each

Eollingshead cards to

weighted occupational

patient

I? and

V.

trans~

on

thc

p

u‘i.05 laval.

Class Diatributian within Hogﬁitala:

In Hospital "A“; 311 or the

classes I

was

facilitata statistical

analyaas. Significanccs were computed
Results:

patiaata

and

II,

12$ to Class

In Haapital

Claaaes I and

II,

3&amp;5

'3',

III,

271

in Class

patients

warn aaaignad

ta

and 571 to 615330:

at the patients ware in

III,

and

39%

in Clauses

IV and

I.

�-5-

'0',

In Hospital

III,

Glass
modion

82%

and 1‘ in Class IV.

class

patients

have

I and II,

worn in Classes

of

Viowod

17%

in

in turns of the

its pationts, Hospital

the highest status (Rd: Cleo:

A's

II), Hospital

G's, the lowest (Ed: Close 1!) and Hospital B's petionts

fall

between tho two, (Nd: Cleo: 1119.10r purpuo of olooo~

ifiontion

we

visualize Hospital

A

no

treating primarily

upper close groups of patients, Hospital

close group, and Hospital 0,

a lower

B,

a middle

class group.

Hospital and Diggnosis:
Comparing the

proportion of

its patients

which ouch

hospital diagnosed as oithor psychotic or non-psychotic,
we

found

oigniticnnt diagnostic differences between institu-

tiono (:2 - 12.73; df- 2;
tended to

treat

p4

.01). In the hospital which

predominantly lower close petionto, 75 For

cont of-ull the patients were considered psychotic; in-tho

hoopitol treating predominantly the middle class group,
7h! per cent were diognoood as psychotic, while in tin

hospital trusting predominlily the oppor class grow),
par cont wore oollod psychotic.

53

�.5.
Social Glace and Dielgceiea

It

in interesting to note some of the diagnoetic

differences in hoepitele,

when

In Classes I and

constant.

II

the class factor
we

found

patients were called neurotic, in Class
neurotic, and in classes

IV and V, 20%

36%

or the

III,

29%

wc-e

kept

was

were

neurotic.

The

direction of these statistics tanded to support the
observation of Hollinguhcad and Redlich but for the

hospitalized patients never theleaa, did not reach
significance
(12

- 5.99,

p

on

.

the 15 level (12

' 5.77; df - 2;

p e

3.8.)

.05).

Hospitals and Treatment:
We

found

differences in the

employment of organic

therapies, 1.0., the peychotrcpic coupenndc
therepiee
p

1n

u.; .01).

and convulsive

the three institutions (12 - 12.12, a:
In the

clue: patients;

hSS

facility

which tended to

at the petiente received

tract
some

-

2,

upper

torn or

organic treatment; in the institution treating middle clues

petiente, abs;
clean pattente,

and in the

th

hoepitnl treating prinerily lover

received crgenic therapy.

�.7Social Clan, Dugout:

ndtrutnnt:

In combined pooulntions or the three hoapitulo, thoro

are differences between the major forms of troahncnt that
psychotic and neurotic patients experience (12
d: - 2;

p

~$.001).

compared with 205 of

In

It!

115$

of the neurotic

were administered to

tho psychotic cacao.

32%

tho

go

Organic thcaapios

of the nourotica and

Patients

or psychotherapy, constituted
1nd kg of

can:

the psychotic tacos, psychotherapy

the dominant trcatmont modality.

wag

' 69-7;

the paychotic cocoa.

who
23%

It

I!

76%

of

received neither organic
of tho neurotic cocoa
has been shown

thot within

hospital settings studied, organic forms of therapy

worn

frequently given to psychotic than nourotic patients.

morc

In touting tho hypothocoa that a higher proportion of lower

class than uppor class patients rocoivo organic forms of
trootnont,

we

round the hyyothosia not to be supported

for

oithor the neurotic or psychotic groups. Within each oocial

clot: group, psychotic patients received organic trootnont
more
was

frequently than uon—poychotic patients but social class

not aigniticantly rclntod to whether or not potionta

�-3...
who

were

either psychotic or noorotio

would

receive organic

thorooy.

Social Class and Length of Hospitalizotion:
When no combined

hospitals,

we

for Class I

&amp;

found

the populttions from the three

that tho

II potionto

hospitalization period

aoan

III

9.2 months, Class

was

and Class IV and V, 7.2 months.

We

found no

9.8 months,

statistical

difference between the lungth of hospitalization or Class

I, II

III patients (t- 1.66,

and

div 196, p - H.S.) but found

significant differences botvoon Class I, II and
patients (t - 7.69, df- 221, ptmm)

IV and

V

.

ggopitalo and Length of Treatment:
The

figures are rotlootod in the different

hospitalization periods that
hospitals.
patients

were found in the

three

In Hospital A, the upper class hospital,

were

hospitalized for

in Hospital 8, the middle class

an

average of

ll

institution, for

montha, and in Hospital C, the lower

S.k months.

mean

months,

8.9

class facility, for

�“9-

Rocapitnlation and Conclusion:
The

primary purooao or this ctudy ha: been to study

the rolationahio of social class and psychiatric diagnosis
and

treatment in hospitals which have available conparablo

facilities.

troutmont

differences, class
which have

We

know

members may

that

baoauso of «coconic

gravitate toward institutions

available different kind: of therapy,

have selected three

hospitals which

and thus we

employ comparable

ranges of therapy and which tend to treat nonbors or different
socioeconomic groups.
“what

In affect, what

is the hospital experience of

oocioocononic groups where

all

we

are thus asking is:

members of

different

forms of thorapy are equally

available?"
Within the

social class

was

hospital cutting described,

we

found

not related to whothcr a person

diagnosed as psychotic or nonvpsyohotio.

Ho

that

was

also found

aooial class to be unrelated to the employment of ergonio
therapy.

We

believe that the relatively wide use that

�-10psychotropic ooopoundo

now

enjoy nay toad to blur tho

sharper diotinotiono whihh oxiotod non. yours ogo than
organic treatment was identified with the shook tad con:

therapies.
We

that lower class position

found

length of time
doooribod.Lowo;

o

was

related to tho

patient spent in the hospital settings
class patients (Glaoaos

IV

&amp;

V) were

hospitalized for anoruﬁormas a: time than Class I, II 0r

III patients.
Major
The

difroronoeo were found between the throo hospitals.

hospital treating upper class patients tended to diognooo

the higher proportion of

its patients

as non-psychotic,

tended to employ a lower comporativo percentage of organic
thoropy, and

left its patients

period oz time.

in treatment for the longest

In contrast, the hospital which tended to

treat patients primarily from the

lower portion of tho ocononio

ooootrnu had the highest proportion of psychotically diagnosod

patients,

onyloyod organic treatment more often than the

other hoopitalo describod, and tort patients in treatmont

for the shortest period of tins.

�.11.
In an

tar

us tau thrac

hospitals studind arc construed,

300131 61188 woulé appear to ho

lass intimataly rclutad to

dingnosis and trantuent than scald the naturu at th. hospitzl itatltg
and the

sacinl gruup tauhieh

it

tddraascs

itself.

�1: 1/3/61
.

soaihl 61:13, DiIIROIil
whrct Paychtatrto

und

trtaincnt 1;

Ht‘pit‘lﬁ

IITRODUCTXOHa

Iva hundrtd and ninety patients in $hr¢a uoau

cuetadinl aetivu trcntiunt ptyehiatria haupitnln,
which

ortcrad multipln tharnpicn, primarily ta typur,

niddlo a: lawn: clnta ﬁcraoul var. Iﬁndaud during
1959*60.

Questions utudicd were whothnr naninl clans £¢r

haspitaltnad paticnta
ﬁypm

It:

ralntod to (a) dingntsil,

a: tr¢ntnen$, aha langﬁh at trautaunt tnd

rahttamhtp at

yum:

suntan-nu»

Cb)

a nun “away",

’miﬁdla', and “tuner” «inns hospitals ta dznauuain,
type a: treatment and longth a: traatnaat.

W!

Volautnurily udaittcd paticnta 1n thrtn

kncvn xucxraphtnclly

47W“.

u/Cc.

f“

V:

atpur:tc httntttll

w¢11~

which

itiﬂrlé

�nan-

: rung. if

thnrup¢ut1¢ prnxruan.

that. putioutu aura

prtnnritr rdprutoutattv. at

$§ﬁ§upptr, 3:831. at

lunar ulnauoa, turn atudiud

t!

s.aluu d:y in thy wintsr,

n! a 311.3 heapittl

19$8~1959

tuilunod thruushaut tacit suntan
and

if

a

Putiontl vcro

hospitalitutsnu

detail: caacorninc that: buneruund, truutuant

nud dtusnunin wart rncurdcd*
33831.93:

Seats}. 6183! was

tau“ ta

ha

r-alaud to lung“:

at notivu truatnnn‘ within tha hotpitnl aettingn.
015': I? and

charm

Y

putt¢nta rtlainad 1n truntnsnt for

pox-ands

a:

an. than. an"

x.

I:

or

m

paticntu. Signittctnt rolutanuuhipc bctwnun 1031‘;
clans, diaguoail ana trtntucut

warn mat uhaarvcd.

sacniticnut rol‘ticnathn war. found bntwu.n
p;t1§nt néubtrthip an upytr,xmiédla and Instr 01‘3t

�inﬂux: and dams“, “aunt. and has“ at
hupiuluutom the nut» in tutwuomu
mum at m "mun, "guitar at Vhﬂhtr a

an: nutwumu
m, that mm mm: tho "My“ ma M man.“
u magma-tun; mu rams." wan-am than”,
and ”mi '56 Mpiullw tu- t!“ lmut yaw-1M at
patio“ m I mum at

‘1‘. a

a

�1: 1/3/61

anuttl Gitul. nzlgntnia ;nd fruuﬁncat 1a
Ebro. Puyuhtatric notpxt;1:
111302301103:

tin

hundrtd nut ninnﬁr patlnusc in thran nth.

custodial ac‘iis trca‘lnnt'ptrchtaﬁrtu knupttnll,
arrdrtd uvlﬁiplo thnrnpioa, ﬁrtaartlr ta appur,

which

gladlo or Inuit «1‘3: pirlﬁﬂl 2‘3. atudand during
‘

19$9~60.

Quautsnas tindiod war. whithar 300151 31.0:
hsnv1%nliutﬁ pntlcntu

it: rnlntad in

(I) din¢n¢nts.

at trausnunt

«:90 a! ircatunat, 3nd 1¢Ig§h

raln‘aonshgp a: Fttitn£ llﬂhirihip a:

and Inngth

$34

th...

‘ntddlc'. ‘ud ”lower“ cln¢a hmlpttnIu-to
ﬂirt or £ruatnant

tar
(3)

'nppcr'.

dianumwzt,

a: trnatunnt.

930039332:

Valuntslrily adsttttd pgtiunta
knuwn

geographiaally Iapnrttc

1n

thr¢t wail-

haipittll which uttarvd

�.2.
3

ring. a! thnrtptutis

progruun, Vhﬂri plttﬁuﬁi warn

prtnlrlly roprcatntaﬁavu a: iﬁiEnppor, ngdéau er
lowcr alumnus, aura Uti‘iid an at n ctvuu hmapitui

«call:

any

in tht‘wiuﬁtr.

tallauod thmaushtu‘

thttt

and 6.13113 unncnrnxug
and

diltnllil

l9$8~1959
BQIrlﬁ

¢

if

Pnttonia var:

hampttnlatuttuu

that! h$ak¢round, trunﬁnnu‘

mutt ruocrﬁad.

Ilﬂﬁlg§x
Benin: ulna: vat fauna to ht rulatcd to langth

at asttro trcntnnnt wt‘han «a; hompttal Ittﬁinsl.
015.: IV and

V

pattan‘u ruuutacd Ln trcntuont {or

thurtar 9.3104: at téuo tuna clan!

pttlthtl. Signifiauat

I, I: at

r¢1m§¢nanhapu

01:33, ﬂtlﬂﬂﬁﬂil nut tr‘aiuomt

lira

:11

bitwcun.taotn1
ﬁat dblorvnd.

aacntttcant rolnﬁiaalhtpa new: round bntugnn
patsaat nadburahip an uyptr, 31441. and luau: «13;:

�human

and

«awn; ”Miami and loan» at

h§Ip1£u1tsatioaa 2h. srnttnr

it: uaataaiaonuntc

Ituiua a: the hanpiQal, rug&amp;raluns a: whither a
puticut

any n ninbnr

gmaup, aha mart

a:

a aiv¢n aacauuaacnumia

11ktly the pat1.n¢ wanié h: diaznaaed

gs nanwpnychoﬁin, wauln rgaeivv neawurgania therapy,
and would be hunpitnliangQr the
$130.

inngsst patina of

�II:

1/10/61

Social Clean, Diegnoeie end Treetnent

in Three Psychiatric Hoepitele
INTRODUCTIOH:

Recent etudiee have indiceted e reletionehip between

eociel clean end peychietric diegnoeie end treatment.
preeent etudy

wee

The

designed to study whether social cleee

for hospitalised patients

wee

releted to diegnoeie, type

of treatment end length of treatment, in three institutions

vith differing eociel cleee

membership of the

patient

populetione.
PROCEDURE:

Two

hundred end ninety

voluntarily admitted patients

to the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital, Hilleide Hoepitel
end the Heeeechneette Hentel Health Center were etudied ea

or e given hoepitel cenene day in the Winter, l958~1959.

Petiente were followed by-e reeeerch teen throughout their
course of hoepitelieeticn end deteile concerning their
beckground, treatment end diegnceie were recorded.

�.2RESULTS:

Sooisl clsss was found to bs mars significant in
coup-risans bstwssn hospitals than in intsr-institutisn

analysis. Within institutions socisl class

was

saluted to lsngth at hospitalisstian snly; class

signiﬁicsntly
IV and

V

patients rsnsinsd in trustmsnt tar shorter psriods thsn

III.

those in clsssss

I, II

hespitsls

significant rslstienships bstvssn social

showsd

sud

Csnpsrison bstwssn

class and disgussis sud trustusnt ss vsll ss lsngth of

hospitslisstion.

The

higher tbs class status of tbs hospitsl,

ths morn likely tho pstisnt would be diagnossd as nonpsychotic, vauld not rsssivs samstic thsrspy and would bs

hospitslissd for s longsr psriod.
hospital

was mars

Tho

class status or ths

importsnt than tbs inﬂividusl patisnt's

clsss msnbsrship in dotsrmining thoss rslstionships.
liIIIUQ

�Junntry 10, 1961.
Dr. Gurdnzr Kurphy,

Diroctor of Research,

Hunningcr Foundition Hoapitnl,
Topeka, Kansas.
Dear Dr. Murphy:

stat:

In 1959, Dru. Siogcl, Kuhn and Pollack at thin
arranzod with Dr. Ksrtuu, ta undarttkc a

canpnrativa population staple study at the in-putiontu
Haulaahulitta Hunts! Hunlth
Hospitals. Tho dtta colltction
ph‘l. at this atudy VII conplotod in Soptunbor, and
V. have prone-sad a large part or the atntiaticn and
and. Ian. prolininary audguonts.
It in our dosiro tn proscnt a comptrativc
stnicuont a: the "Social Class. Dingnoui- ind Trontuant
in Thruu Paychittric Hanpitalt ta tho incriesn Sociolozianl Sacicty in Augnat. rho dutu bl! bath intlysod
according ta hypothcucn undtr otudy in tho in-pationt
sorvico at Hillido Hospital in 1957 and 1958. An
abutrnct or this initial roport in enclosed for your
Honninger Hoapital,
It
Cbntur and Hilllidu

internatian.

urn plonuod ta credit the cooparatinu of tho
ill thrto institution: in enabling this utndy
to bo incomplilhud. I: that. it :ny additional connunicntion
W.

atattu or
noogatngy
new
as

for thc prancntntiou or this data,

Du; Robbins

and hipyy

ycar.

Join: us in withing you

a

Sine-roly yourc,
Enel.

HFsJB

m iInE H05.

would you

lot

anccoasrul

�Social Class, Diagnosis and Treatment

Jar/a
‘

in Three Psychiatric
Heepitals
9s
[4 N
p as,
"Axum If “lips: his
62%;};

s

.

d/mAM ,/

I

INTRODUCTION:

as

g

fag / AL»; 4 Kata, Xvi/5k.
we

,4

A

.

_,

Recent studies have

.1

/

”wk

indicated/a'relationshiﬁ between

social class l and psychiatric diagnosis

MW“'

treatment.I\

and

The

designed to study whether social class
aunt
for hOSpitalized patients was related to diagnosis, A type

present study

was

oi—taeotment and length of treatment, in three

institutions

Withhdiffering social class membership,e£_:h¢_9a;§en¢_.
popaiebfﬁﬁs.
PROCEDURE:
Two

voluntarily admitted patients

hundred and ninety

to the C.F. Menninger Memorial HoSpital, Hillside Hospital

the Massachusetts Mental Health Center were studied as

and

of a given

Patients

hospital census

day in

the Winter, 1958-1959.

research team throughout their

were followed by a

course of hOSpitalization and details concerning their
background, treatment and diagnosis were recorded.
71.9.3th

)7

5/2,

”mg

r [£1
44M”
‘2

I

(’-

’3

1,1,4";

at. &amp;

“4.4140,,51‘:
,

2:3;

f.a.Aﬁ/_
1.14931.

3

,

j&gt;gﬂ(‘""4" I)

MM! 14.0741;

5&amp;4:

4‘

I ”my
1:“

2'33;

4»

fall’g’ffrf (4“

{W4

/

"w
a? “3‘

”

.

M

was f.
a a, ,x.
aw Wm,
f‘zl/“ié ”*Muwwt‘
.-'

7

“A,“

I

‘5

’

1,»

.

«min

ad.“

an»

g9 252‘.
.6‘
-

I J,

£354

{V _

an

,

'

.

�-k’

RESULTS:

a

.

Social class

was found

comparisons between

WM

if

”54/

to be‘more significantnin

hospitals than in inter—institution

analysis. Within institutions social class

was

related to length of hospitalization only; class

signiﬁicantly
IV and

V

patients remained in treatment for shorter periods than
1132.?

those in classes

I,\II

hospitals

showed

significant relationships between social

class

diagnosis and treatment as well as length of

and

hospitalization.

The

and

Comparison between

higher the class status of the hospital,

the more likely the patient would be diagnosed as non-

psychotic, would not receive somatic therapy and would be

hospitalized for
hospital

was more

a

longer period.

The

class status of the

important than the individual patient's

class membership in determining these relationships.

M

�Mary

16, 1961.

Dr. Hilton Greenbhtt,
manhunt“ Rental Kuhn Center,
72-76 rammed Road,

Bolton, Hen.
Dear

mm

It In good talking to you in Wuhington. I think the
meetings went very well and I eapociauy liked Shep Roma's
raport

location

the

VA,

pnuont-paumt intonation.

on

also quite
an
Xurlmd and

is little

The

many nit-moon
in
studios. more

ammo

good. bringing out the
drug

Comm oomtin
and for phoebo control! now in

and comparative efficacy tasks

on

saluting
be

who’s Mom

to

Encloud in our inltial abstract much
to the Andean Sociological Society.

we

My

best. regards.

Sincerely you”,

an: inn: mﬁ.

Baal.

HF: JB

new drugs

in order.

am sending

-

�1.

3...

W
.‘

M753
.

2,3,8.

z

m»

5;.

in.

5.

7

8
7.

4/44:
m7
IAA/c

M, m
M4
n

n

""

If?

’é

a

,

fl.

"0
5
.

.__n

22...}

.JL

A

~

MI

Ag~nhﬁ

‘

13.

m.

In"
M ta man
mum
at

“4.”. I. mmm ms
WW!!!”

m...“

“,.".“.

-WA

�at»

mamount:
”a“ m
I!

1:

'u‘n‘m

5. 19:19
6. 19-”
300

,_

15.

N»?!

0M!

3.

5.a

{@099

Ya

1'0‘1!’

#.

’1

a.
16.

u km

6!

..

‘

”-1”

Rod”
'9‘.

h tumum

Q‘tumﬂ
sans.
ems
:1.
1
’1

an.

3m. 5

"m
m it ms mmum mm
ii

s

g.

11,13.

316/”);
I

“a M‘. “O

“1mm
a
A6311!
as.

1’.”.

ruemnn manna“
rm:is!
”I M‘
m.
I. 13mm:

mun

9i!

mm WPHHJMW

amruu‘wﬁ

O

9. Q

'0.

no

‘.

turns-nun

4.

._.

..
A

.‘..‘L_'A___...L.HA

L.“

A

Mo-A_#*;W¥L~_JIAAL

�4-

mm
III:

mm mm It men,
mum.
34

“I
5:;

I

I

93.

I

,

\

III.
l'“!’
13ﬁt3 "II
“‘4.

I: II IIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII It IIIIIIIII
I. IIII IIIIIIII: IIIIIIIII
IIPW II IIIIIIII'IIIII
J. IIIIIIIII
5*

\

IIIIIIII

'3.

IIIIIIIII IIIIIISIIII
IIIIIIIII II
II IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
-I. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII
3. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII
II IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I.
IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII III.
I. II IIIIIIIIIII
I'lﬂtﬁﬂllfiﬁtlilll If IIIIIIIIIRD
Biliﬂﬂliﬁt
'

~

IS.

IIII II. II IIIII

1I‘mh
II IIIIIIIIIII
3.
I

,.
6.
1.

I.

II

IIII
II
I,
39
,.

.

a;

m

dz..u.__._4-_‘_#_l

“1*
I4..&lt;_;&lt;A’....._._A

IIIIIIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIII
II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
II. II IIIII III
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, IIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, II IIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, I II
IIrIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
:gzuIIIIIIIl IIIIIIIIII

W“

.._..__‘__‘_._..__

A

7

-

.4,

_.

.4...

A

_

l. IIUIIIIIII1IIIIII

A

.__A

meMLJnmIAuig.

"u

�.5.

III: II. II IIIII *1“
,5
IIIIMum-m
I
III; ,
3‘ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII €£II1J¢I.)
k4 VIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
I.
6. 6IIIIII_IIIII IIIIIIII. IIIIII.
,‘I I”; am
a. II «umauguuu
!I!
IIII III. II
:1.3%!“
3. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. PIIIII IIIIIIII
I. IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. Dita:
I.
I. II IIWIIIIIIIIII

w

’m“

xi”

fiéﬂ/M/k

h“.

“OILIIW'S'
IIIIIIIIIII
ammo 1.I.3. PIIIIIIIIII‘IIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII

W
W

16.

I. IIIIIII 6liﬂ’ﬁil IIIIIIIII
Q‘hﬂ

III. II IIIII “6’
IIIIII IIIIIIII
IIIII
II. IIIII IIIIIIIIII: IIIIIIII
I IIIII IIIIIIII It IIIIIIIII
:.
lilﬂﬂﬁ‘rlﬁl‘ﬁli It IIIIIIIIIII
‘.
I.
IISIIIIIII IIIIIIII II III. IIII
’I
II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I. ”If
IIII III. II IIIII ‘6'
I. II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IugtIgillz.‘:IIIIII
m
III
3Iml
1 I I /
I.
VIII

1.

'

m

I
1»

.

5151*"

33%;
MI

3*

3'

i'
..

:

I.

‘:

‘..

.

,‘

&gt;

_,: \_

‘

k

A.

J
...

.‘A.

Kuwr

S‘

.
A

Jam-.1

I‘m-Hana;

�4"

man“: Fer-Chm:

#7.

M

“in

3..1.

mu
ﬁrm My

aa. aw‘33”:
h «mm
Q

J

m

W

i
1

I

-

MW‘
:1

Mill‘

W‘“;:J”*”'
4"
N
m3w
x95?

W
a ..

W

a.

a..

s.

g.

;

’

..

la

1

,1”

77W

3

a

9’

t

1

t.

595'?

,‘é/W

.

3

«r

‘

3

”:3“ m

.

ﬂ/M/L

13% :

£5

OI.

V

man nasuumm
.. h 5 mm
6 min
7. ’41 mm:
mu:
9% 13‘ mm

1.33893

1

at

,.

:,

=

18;. 151

'

-

1

.
a

‘

m.
so

31,,

1

a. St Mutation
1'" sea:
*‘N 3
ea. I. intonation

.Mm

IW
TM

ill/M
a

'

'

LEW.

'
:~

1
44

�W
ﬁﬁﬁB

6913:;
1.

r 1953,
1. 1:1 Iﬂtyltll'5%lé195?.
2. Billaidt stuay,
1966.

Its:

138.

3333?

_

xearltAL
'2. Kenninzur

3. East. ﬁcatanIQA1th
S. 3:113:53, 195?
6‘ niilsidc, 1969

2,3’hc

£121!!! lﬁﬁiﬁl

5.

831

6,1.

an:

8.

axe:

iii:

1.

2. Ytntle
Extst 3:.

~~.

It

99.
15

infatuatiau

Wits

E. xogrc

am:
a. San: or
3.

9.

10.

nu

iaiaruatioa

nxaxaxan

1. yrotOtttnt

2. Gathcli¢
3* 3‘?in
6. I: or an iatnratttou
ﬁtaltth atagaa
1. single
2. ﬁsrrzcd
3 3 .F”‘§Qd
h. Biraretd
5. ﬁiéavcd
4b

a. la iatirnntzan

11,12.

naaatrzes
-~. Years at aduottita
seas tar colylattd years
-~.99. lo internatian

13.

rnacx a! 31323

1.

331

2. Farciga Barn: Englinh spanking
Sanatrics&amp;
*
: Gorxanie Scandina
3.
avian
.‘ i
ho
I Irina: &amp; Spain
5.
‘
: alnvie ﬂattens
.
t Lﬁtiﬁ ﬁltriaﬂ
7.

5.

a.

'
''
''

“

-

it“,

-

'“

x

stag:
In

infatuation

�«2..

13‘33 1! 3.3.A.

1h.

1. Iativo bars
2. L11: thtn 1
3: 1‘3

h.
3.
6*
7.
9.

I.ﬂ.

15.

1.

5*?
16~19

”“29
36*
Is iatnrutticn

a: 1:3:

69

2. 79.15
3- ag’e9

ha 9a~99

5. 1a0~1a9

?. 129-129
at I39“139
9. aha¢

e..la
16.

informatiaa

Pirillfiﬁ

1. 613:.

.

2. Glass
3. 611::

$661££ gangs
1
2

3

’. Gina: h
5. Glass 5

e.
17,15.
19,2ﬁ.

.

£93

ﬁﬁknoua

I? r123: vstaxxtraxc carrier

~«. Sxact

:3.

30. Re infatuation
gas-tr 112s! rsxcnzsrxxc nesrxrnzxzxrzex

ea. In infatnntian
$1.

333383

1.01

6! P3103 £G$F1t1313511915

z
3

k
6! 5
6
7

a 1».

nolinturnxtian

�’3.”
221

fail}

9? FﬁIﬁi

FIRIQF

Ian:

195F121§ EIP£IIBICEB

1.11 1113 1 unath
2‘5 “84»
6~11

Ina.

“5.
I...»
213-335 ”in
35‘h?

1%“1?

18*33

”it
h. :aars
in intsrnttiun
23.

66331118! 12 31363533;

2h.

61363116! 63 £32133ISIEB ”11536613
?arch¢r1s: ﬁch11uphranza rotatiaa

1. link Ilprct'd) larkadar 3:1.3 Inoammnd
3. Ingratud; ﬁbéqrxtozy lag.) Slightly it
ﬁnahaagia
t11ghtl: svrco; Shiny.
h. 311.1111 tr
6. to intarnltioa
Pcyahasiu: tituct1vu rigstions
nguhsaiu: #151111
Psyuhcauuru$1c.31uar¢ur

?arﬁuntlity nitgriur

7,?raaziiu1
attugt1satl retaintlity 31:.
‘Ho 1n£§rintiyn
25.

saacaasszrzsnztars at 1321311353»
311636315:
Etta 691 2% 101:1 81:
1. ﬁtlplt
Ebhsphrouie
.ﬁatatanic
7

Purlnoid

Lent: unéifftrsntiﬁtcé
Ghranic ind1££utentittcd
7

S¢hise~a££ectivo
childhaad

9th.:

ﬁn

ﬁabelaasifiaatica

60.
thnKtnia

.

2h

atﬂad

'2’

dsprataivt, Innis

3:11: daprcaa1vc, dtprcstiru
£3311 dnprcia1vu, athtr
Paychatic depraaaivt rttetion
- Intaias1aaul dﬁﬁf'tliV'
911::

subalass1tieatina
I

no

�aﬁt‘zh Gﬁdla *3.

disardtra
4nata'brtin
4560““?

(niltpgy)
(and.
:«ﬂanmwhﬂu
an}

Ew’lr.‘

_

.

'Vntaaltr
truagntig
erratic Evil: diacratr. ﬁﬂ‘t‘tb
93$, MIMI?
lo subalnulit1e3$1aa
301*

:3

ﬁﬁdﬂd “h“

Antag$y roamtiﬂa
EausqalatiVH rnuutioa

raunttna
absaauivn aﬁuvultivc r‘natiaa

,

ﬁnmvarczan

Pttii¢ ratatiun

ntprasaivi rauatﬁﬁa

attsr
tubcllﬂltticttiin

,

no

.

$01. 2k ﬁﬁﬁﬂd *5!

Peruaanlity ptttcrn diutarbnuao
Purnoutlaty trait dﬁtturhtaao

,

.

.

ﬁﬁaigpnthln ﬁcraanality dintnrhuncu
ﬁpOGttl ayxmtnu

ﬁthur

reuetttns
'

no nubazganixientiﬁa

6.1;

,

ah ﬁﬂdﬁd ”6*

strata rutctiqu
arts:
Aduiﬁ uttutﬁitngl runotign
xdjnstnant ratctitu a: «hilahtad
Aﬁauatnunt rauctaan a: tillllﬁinni
¢djuataaut rnaattan a: Int. 11:.
.

athur

It

stb¢1¢saitt¢ati¢n

whgn 601. 2h
531*

ﬁﬁu

«04:4

'6’

in Inhalgtnzt&amp;eatinn

txaarnaxxs

numeral

Payahsthlxtyy

2; new; Inﬁtklna
3 Q ﬁrms.
1*!
3

3
6‘ 9 9 3
2?: 1 o 2 4 3
3* iﬁac
I;

3w

Q

{

no in£arua£$au

�17¢

g,

*

1.

m Ptﬂi’hﬁ‘thlmy

runaway“

1. {ayahithtripyw
3; rmyuhathnmapya
h. axon, ﬁhtrﬂyy

£13.
9111:

S. ﬁn¢p¢¢1£1Id
6‘ a. ptyuhothurnpy

a.

1310:3111”
11:1!uﬁﬂtu arxnnia
lid

1. Phanuthyustucm (er, Frintlini,
13:911111,

:24.

1:11 )

layman, «purl, «numb

thnruatut,

mm.

ovzaain tttitnnut
it 1a£arntt1an

ya
11 $0

13.

133623 0? 198111111311133
133311 9111116 21312K131
.1»

81
3a

&amp;0

Wt
11:: ﬂhﬂn 1 ltﬂk
1“ a!“
1‘2 Hﬁﬁﬁ;i
naathI
1
‘
?*8

5» 311

6. Sub
7c

5: 9*10

9. 11

64
291

HQ

3

truths

4

iniawnntltn

1331? ew-avnnxuz 80511211111116!

1. tan than

2‘”
‘t

13st
nanth:
7~8

*1
3 I 22222

E. 6

30 day:

101111

7: 9111 noaﬁha

89.

a.
39,31.

12

again;

£1

zurnruntitn

13¢~u¢atha

12* $3613

11. a
90‘ I

littiyiﬂﬂfﬁ
1R£Vvuattoa

It

�33.:
'

aaazxs Aa:aamuxir
1* Ilwruvné
3. unimprtvnd

a. ﬁt tutmrunttun
33.

ﬁltﬂtﬁﬁln swinging:
1»

Maw“!

e¢

In iﬁtﬁrlﬁtiﬁm

2. Eutnpravod

3h.

axlanama.

Guaylatn rauiauiwn
Ingrtvaa
t.3. ﬁnahnatad
{1: watt.)

1»

a. a. inttrantiiu
35.

xvgxuarxax «an!
1» ahsaktd {vat}
3:. ﬁnish-”kw (at)

36.

axnavnszmnans #3 nxaaxanan
lmrrrcltnunﬁ eunmlntgd

2. any

hatpitil

Plrahuthﬁrtpy hat:
k. l¢tpttgllnat&amp;aa alauuhtwo
5g‘?‘1§hﬂ§§ﬂﬂﬁﬁ¥ alacwhtra
6. In infatuatiin
3w

,

7!! anti. unutui inaath avatar ark!
32-

1..ﬁ§‘rt ﬁts;

a. ﬂat Frnaﬁiﬁ

Gnu:

���~3—

_

gum-qwmmcummmumﬁapmmmmmmor
gm Wham“ Mm u an... and; WW6 W_M
Milan.

1:.

m palm-d mt, ta! mid; tutliﬁuowm mutton m

Iuwummmmuanng-motmmm
wwwzmummmmw

m‘La-u.

Iﬁm’W.M%
wommummmgmmmwmmkdwmammwu

mm» mxm,

W

pmmmwm.

m a»

mum mmum

M

pmmmwmmwmmmmwmmm

mmmtmmmmmwmmmmmmumamwu

mmmumm.lm.tWWuu-W,MW
umzemmmmmim. tummmmn-Wmimm
mmmmmmmtm). m,mmmmmmw

mmmmmnpmmmmmmmm

Wmmm Wmmtwmadﬂtmmtmm
ammm,mammmgmmwmwwm.
mummmpmenmmhm,mmmmumm,

gmmmmmsmmxmaw.wumm mama

w

���r——————,——————
*6.
&gt;

‘mmnumwmwmmmu‘mmorm
_

discipline

..

mm mm, W, Mimi

“what...

$06131

mm m
5,"

.

'pmhnmwytamWQrmtupmmtmmvmWW
V

mmmmwmwmmmmwamM.

W’
&gt;

'

I

mwummmmmm 1&amp;1!th

thmmmmioWMMmtmmmmm

wmmumpmm. memumwimwsmmt
'Wamgnemmmmmmmwuwwmnwtmm

W1. .Iu'Mpm-mtowgmmwmmtmmmdm
mm W. £11»an «W Minimum: mun
«mgmmummumm. mxmmmmm
“thaw“.ammtbancgmmmetmb-‘mmu
mmmMmum. rammimupum‘mmmnnm.a

mthmmm-w

»:

Wmmtmm.

�ummmww,mmamwmmtmamm
mmwwmmmwm.muw
“Murmnmmrmnnwmxﬁmmmm
i

mammuumnmmm.mmwmw.
mum-hammﬂmmmu wmsmmum ml:

mm‘nmmuwhu‘mmrm www.mm

mmmmmmmamewmmmgmu“
M1311

������“Wmmmmmmmmwmw

mum (m

W
m

171.

mu, mm).

“mum.mummummmuummnm
somtmmwmwmmmm,mmmmmu
‘

V
I

(man).

thmmm:mmmmmmmumrm

“mgum'ammmammmuwmrm,mmmmu

“Ww‘WMqumuummrmm (1mm).
mammanmna-mwnummm gws.
mm
W. mm WM
mm
1%?”

with-high

1’

M

in tum-1w?

mummmnmummwthmsmmmwnmrm
mu.

�m... .an—

-w—-——.—.»w.««p—

.muq“.

w.“

ﬁt,murmur

. ,._......,,_

w“,

,_.‘,..._W

gm 52.1%!

w‘

DINm BIAMIS

Wm Pmuy

WHIGAI‘IOR

mm

1. Ema-Mum mutton

Pmmmoaia

2.

Medina Pmmﬂity

Parchment.

3.

Mathias

Pennant: Trait Bitten-blues

Pmonanty

h. Naminittiu Pmmlity

ammo
When“
Inﬂam-

Pwmlity

5.

6.

Putin Ingram“

Mmliw
WWII

aociopathia

1’»:th
nwholiu

Soaiopathic Pertaining
Disturbance

Maul. Pawn-.111:

Sehisophk-ouie

Behiwphnnio inaction

Somsmuctiw

Typo

thoni-

�mm"

n‘w—w—w‘

m— Irwmww-

"~-

mn-

Wamm
”Wm

�w,

._w._.....-—»—.——7

“my“. .

*w‘Iw—wm—

..w..,,,.-mm~—v

m
‘

‘

'
'

m

x

5?“:th

n

1y:

I?

~87

$1

17

1.

1‘33-

20

3k

3k

5’

12

23

29

28

w
rm

m

8.1m

x

'

.

m

=

9

L,

.

MM?”

W7M

;

i

.

“(wa

’

v:

“:7:

‘

�———..——-...

rum

m
ﬂ
19
§

33

19

ps

:5

11*

-

.

M
5-9

22
23

53

33

�warm-c- ,. “mm, .‘VJW

100

w—m..-.v.q—.. m...

2,,

173‘

17
119

10

.~ .

‘

my;

�1463

�"mm mm”.

W--—»;

'7

,

,-.n.wv—.v--u-— mm...“mp-w

.m ......—

'“uvt 74v

'Mv-m-“'F‘.--'-

-

«sow—n” u:

mumm-

173
89

2h

68

v.krw' ﬂaw-n.

—,..., :

_—.

——wr

"erv‘va—u“ w.»

�,cw—wm._

100
173
95

67

2?

-

“win-l1

mm,—

11*!

w. y»...

,V.

"an.“

W 'W‘

‘

1‘

.

�“Irv-CV

gm
85

29

-TW

�mm

1..

him. mm... In:

3am:

03ml.

hunk,

913.13.

Plum.

amt'

m m,

In:

”.13.

8111.“.
mam-y,
Mama
61.“
‘01.,
'0’.
MI,
Wt”,
tit-2099.
by
tho
grunt
at
hum-1
mu
pm
uh»,
or
mm
3.3.
m1.»
rune
mm.
5mm
2: m tum ems: than), mu W.
the emu-um o: a. “I“: o: u-aha-«hunt. mum
an.
out.
data:
in!“
Burnt).
m
mam
1: mm: «momma.
Buumnt a: yacht-My ' ﬂoatation
“an.“
”an“
manual,
an.
111‘

1m.

m.
7/26/61

or upon ”a“.

W

�value“

«an» a: ‘m‘y

popﬁlnﬁicnt 33v. establishnd
rhotovu oouaorntat

in.

and“

Mann. ”graham.

9.01:1
tin import-no. or

type and tncidnncu ot-Iontnz d1a~

order and ﬁn. ctlta$1on a: troltaont; ﬂoat notabln,ot

thin! 1th$t$¢$$10nl has hit! that
Vltdllch

(

) who stndaad

duﬁgnntrn‘od n

it.

3:!

it

801113338036 and

Karen pcgglation uaa

rclntltashlp bctunsn 1:61;: 31:33 can

such puyuhtutrte aspect:

a. tap. a! iroatnun‘ Ind

Stu: thaw ttﬂid £baﬁ 1:!!! 01:0. pitiolta

Ir.

61l3n0I18c

nor. lituly

to in «13:30:96 as satisophvunia and rooctv. 0:23:19 or
custodial trua‘nnnt than

ti... fro: higher 300131 ltvolu.

flynhothcrayy, particularlynnnrehounalytil. In: restric‘od

to ‘ho uppor clasuos.
#341. $ho bactc-tlpovtnnca

aria-at, turthtr tuttlttlt$too1
taut th:

omp11¢1%

at

such studio.

nro 3.3.33.9: to

1'
actor.

{Intern or pruco§a¢a¢that undovlio 5:383

rolnﬁloa:h:ys. an. Inch tent: in; institntod at

81113115"

�.3;-

”“1113”?- Mummmmd.um.u

mtmnuanmzmmuuumuum
out mum-u: «mun sum

as the

nun-v.

Mlmnmnmtmwuwumt
tutu“... MIMI. m “Milt“.

A.

3111.“.

it.

mwmmmmmmmu
umumu.nmmawmuwum.

hmtﬁvaWQwII-aumunuam

umwnwoCmumummo-a
chum.

«mmnmmmummmm

WWW. hmﬁum.mun.
«I «a “no at tun m twat-u: manual
.0

m

01’

Whit» mm

04'

mum“...

onwmummuumumu(

).

am. In" your” «and; Wynn-u m

mtmlyumctn‘mmw:wmmnm

�«’4.

mummwamtmmum.mnmu

anwumouno,mmum

mammm5umumumm

WMWMMM. nmwuumm

m, ”mm,

nun-bun mu- m» m can

thammuuu.amuu
wum.'mums'm01m«1

W
"WWW.

”.mmmummumu
mmummuwhmm;
Mom

CM“

iv

mm

$3.1

tho

”in"!

u'mummmrsunr

a
am

nu

a

W
mt

it I!!!“

a:

1:qu

than

In!

h
01'

It“
mun

Mm.“

man.

”at“: It. m‘mt

awmuum‘uuumwu.m
ﬂu

m mm m mm Mm; m human-u

��.y.

nmmwuummum‘m
“manna-yum. taxman-0W

unmtﬁvaw.udmiwkumduh

W

M O“ tﬂﬁhﬁm, m 0.1. ﬂow-SI”! luau!
In“). In!“ MW
loath]. M “I

W).

W
man.
M

swam m than Mu.

mm.-

m
”mmmm’h
Walk-mm
W:
m
«up

a

man-um 0:

mm m“

”In.
mmmmtm.

”out gunman or m

he muhm

“1.. I)

M

be!”

«a

m as» not Input u

1)

I «am

WM, Wain

.m3)muumammamuumu
vm 1mm in
an
mum. am mm mm

um.muauuwmuunnw.

�do

m
wmm‘mumtw.
m Mu mu.
Mt.
W
mum m. “unﬁt
"I
”In“!
no

1)

«mm mm

m hospital ma
m

mus-nun

a

a

mm“.

W

"at.

nth

of

t" mmmmawmmmwm.
m Wm'l um a militant Mun mutuIum ti. an“ ”my; ummuuumx Mum.
1!)

muumMmmu-aumzmus.u

m ‘19:“. mm on» own-tun a: an "a.“
um
W'm
can
mm m
mu...
and}...
in“:
luau.
nun“,
mm
Ill" amt-.mmmwugammvum
can” (0» m1. 112).

um

m

m

�d}.

m

”inﬁll“ hWhMMQﬂIM”

auumuhulmlﬁlmum.
“luth' luau!- I“ ”1w ”mu
mm.

W
almamllmnihﬂOa‘mmW‘m
and

”alum.
m
“I
mum WW
mm
tun-it.
mind“
m
M. ”an“ m
M. M
1»

mutt“ mum
too 1»

1'!)

in!!!“

”with!“
mm

mum

on

human-do

a:

If

mm

1"

93

min

a‘.

nxum Ronni.

manna
at m
at
on

m «comm an.

ammum,wmuuumu

means mm. 1mm ”assignment.
ma
dun-a1 min“... «4
of

W“
Wu
mum. MWW“W¢M,M
).
and
“1111’“ um m m
(

�W
m
an
m
mm
run

0W.

at“:
m

In“ a ﬂu

In
”on
“up“.
“in
“Wu-m
In
:“can an

mum-M Minn” III

a. «tuna «a "mum at

3mm.
m «a. I: w «amt. a: smut. mm. In
«cum-rid «aw c: pram- macaw rub a.
0!
mu“ mp1»: um. “my. “a.
meow
a.

m
min am in. a “mum: mm.
dmuuﬂuu m ”-qu

may...
th‘

m

on

a

«to not min a m

dawn“: “www.muo mm.

mum-mumsmm»u
Hu I: am ”an“ m locum ”Win.

m
m

thou-unl-

mkmutummnnmghﬁmm

a»

�~9-

mmuamammuummwm
”mmuuzummwmnamm.

W
“mus-amaammnww.
mum

A‘

«at:

WW

II! a

dam.“

W

am
pan-Is
m
m
at»
WW»
80!. mm “amp-unam-

“mm

mt
Wmamummmuum
“It
m

mm“ a» mum wt mun
Winn-m you.“ m. u nmm Ilium
(Ind)

WW

d”

mm
mm.
muuuumuunmtnmuwnmm

km.

MiG-at

In! 1‘

aw Wmummmm. um.

“.muwmuuuuuuwmm
an mun.

nmm.umt.m

mummaumummmmu
mm:
m1.
3min.
mm.
We“ mm.

�1-10-

W“.
mmrumkmmummmam

at
amino
run“
an
m:

wrkﬂw and

awummrmuummmnmumu

m
mum
inn

m mun-0 mm a

,Wn

I! “who It in

tantrum).

at

”I.“

wt
item.

mus

in ma.

mt
m mm:

nu ﬂu

it“ ﬂit.
than

am“ a rm

aw muum “In: in: its mum at ﬁll mum.
on
sum aha-Mum an w mm a:
m macaw m as him than an
um

W
W

sauna“ 8“ man to mm;
Wm an;
QM

um

in a»
aim, than mu
a m manna
at 30W huh-1 m u“ &lt;1”on «a
s «an,» gnu-amm- mm. mm.

In our

Why

Wu
"mu

m. MW

w.» mm

m

�«‘11-»

u

inn-1m

an
was.

WM.

mm

mm

mm m

MI. 1 “mm“. 0M1 mm
m that but than um mm “mm in” m

M

«harm Win W M ““hMg
or
m
mast-3.:
as ”mm;
mu diam”.
«mammain

Mh I
1‘:.,u.z...c.4.,1;8

ems.»

”In.

“um: um W‘. n It“
bid
we
mﬁ
01M!“
mm, Mm mm
n:

_m¢. 1:

WIthan

min-um a: must. manna.

A:

Ch

ambit.

a ml- :1. m Mum. mm a

WWW»: mmnuuamu

W!
WW
W. mmmmmsmarammnu

mum. in

nasal,

and

�nun

mmtuouummmmmumumu

wmmwmum.wmm.

Intactumummmuumuﬁum
“0 ”ﬁlm "an. ”31%“.
OI’

at
W
In"
«an
mung

m

mutant. (mu

“mm-nuns“), tmﬁym
mmuuuummmw.uuunm.um
”muucm1uu.mmnuutu¢Wﬂ.
MmhIhu'. unmmm»m..uuu

m).

OWWMMUM‘WWMﬂmwnw-ﬂ!

ummmnm’umn.

Atm.mmw1w

�«na-

ammglitmmt)m£~uum
"ﬂibmﬂﬂlhlﬂﬁlrwmmm
M5

Mmummmumx

mutual(”to”).
mumummm

ﬂMﬂMWWM“WV-mwmﬁkc

Warm. 'mmmumomom

mautwmmumm

W
mﬁwmmumumumm
mamaammngm

muwmmwmmmmu

hmwmw.mmiuuwmmumm
(mun).

mhzmmnmnmnm

uwmuummummwm.m
mmwawstwmuummm

munmnwmm.

�db-

mmummmu
Immmtmhu). “inhuman
Lma

mm.nwmumwmm

*MW'MW”.NWI§QMII§
manna-hm.

“mun“.anyu

”mmnmﬂaamtm,auuwm

”mutton-an. mama-mama.

mmurmmumm
”.msemhv.
mmeuI-auu

«mmmmumum
magma-autumn. um.m

mwmmuwmwrsm.

mmmwummmaamm

�.15.

mum.

m.

Mam-I &amp; mi. that

mmumm:mmu
MmumuHM-mumumu'

mm

m m an“ «nanny

Wuﬁm-ﬂmmmf
mums-Wwamnmt
'mmmmmwmum

).

mumummmw

.mmmatmsmmw.

”Mummmwnw
mmnvudnammmuunamu

stoma-mum. ttﬁimﬂﬂtw

W" «W
.

=

'*

a
umwmm
~

WWW. ”QWthwm

�mwmwuum.mummm:

”mummwpnmm

nmumnmmmwmumm
mummmummmtm
:mumwtammnwmm
uwumm.uummmram

“Mm‘mquanuw

Mfmﬁmw‘.mlmtmhhﬂm
“RMCMJAMJAW.
Mime
mmm.~

nmmummmumim.wmu

�Q1,”

“Initial “It I rim with a um I «an an
m»muuyumwmum. MG

puinh‘MIom.umm-vvw.u

but niobium" mmwumm'n

mauwammmm.

«mam

m.uamuunlml tum. Sen-nub.”

W

W's.
Wmmnmmmmuum
but 1m» to WI.“

at

unmtummmuuuuummum
mum {Mk II). at “Imam

w

an“

m.mm.uuwwmtumum

mumuuuummmmtunmw
m.munmmuuanmmmum

ammuwswmtumuw.
“swam“,mmmmnmrmn
m

�.48..

m.

W

aux.

WM“ mmwmumm

d ”Hm“...
mm «at manna-u m m m:
m: and: “um u
a mus-nun»
mm
In a. Wt
yam
Md. timzmmm.mum
with“ mm mm

”W

W

m

m

W

W. W,
mmlwmmnmﬂ “4“an
Inﬂux rating!

m um-

A.
In
an
.mm
n
10.3,“
lacuna-u
«- am an

hr :2 mm a m n tho
a minus" m

pm

W:

mum“:
u
w.
m

tin-m

am

in ”mm a: mum“... or
.1- am. in sum xx. in
mm“
a
”new
Wu
mm um.“
m. m, catamaran.
and
a!
minimal Win: mm, main:
Mini. m1. W m «um um: Mm:

um

�A:-

WWNnMWWth
mutmnmmw.m‘m
mamuamuunmwm.
w-

nmuummmnwwtmm

mimmWﬂhﬂth.ﬂﬁ
mommuwrmnmm‘mawhu
“wumnuumm. Mﬂkﬂiimm
mum-hm. stWWMﬂIIlnﬂut

nuutmIMMathkkh¢Wu
u Wat-I” w 'mw mm“. m: an
mmrmatmumhunumm

amn$mu
Wu'mm’.
Minivan. “Mnmmﬁarmdm.

�om

WHMIRM!‘WWWW

uWth-“mmm',
mmnmu'mw'. um.
uws.ﬂmmﬂmmm_muq
H

.l.,“,.Vl

1'5

mm»

stamina-mum
mtaummummmmtuwuum

n‘wuuammu’w‘. vu‘uw

W.W.nmtw'ummmt

WW“W“M“O”WWamw

asmuuw-amtmumw.

At

mmmammwmww,uas«m
qmmun.mmmtmmumm

www.mmuutmuww.
mummmummmmu

m1“.

Asnmmmmeut-umm

�~21»

cmumuuummmmm.
wwmhmskWIWtW'“
“W'umWa
thm).
mum.uwmmwomuuu

*m

W.

��«so

unmet-mum“. um,umt.

mumsmmmunwum
mmmamw;mw.mm

wammdawmwm.
mwm‘mummm
mmw:mmmm~m

Mummnmmuum.
wan-am
mum
mm
mm
Wt
).
at

2.2

«mtwwc
mum'ap'ﬁhu‘ an mun-attain.

m’WM-m

an:

unﬁt-Wlmdnutumm. Mm‘cmu
mam”.

”mummmm',m.

It. mt

Win; it”.

me

WW

�"35*

mnunm

u Mum mm

mm
«is: :W

M
w
Imam”
m
t
a M
3m:
than
was
Mam u mad: mung: aunt's
manna. MWWmﬂhﬁﬂWFn/nua

m
W
WﬁﬂWbWMﬂl-de
www.momzymmmu
m
Mm

mMW‘fa

a. mu»

MWhhM‘WWan

NuWWW.
MW. “.mguummm
nu

WthuMW-mw.

minim!»

uwwmumtmmmmwm

umwmmhawumw
“WmmumuMMMu

��1.

I.

Wynn mmw

W

mat-tic Personality

awoken“: ”in

rmmmaa

Eta-mu” W5

3mm

8.01m this, Fungal:V
'

Mambm

‘.

m

Saginaw Pursuant:

Far-a:

misty

Madam“ int

mow-

WW

�I:
CW,

15833
and»

itiﬂili 9i ﬁﬁlﬂiﬁﬂisﬁﬁiﬂlﬂiﬂiaﬁi

IZﬁE

ﬂcxrtagiou

�Wrww’

W
”mm

m

_.DEP.' RTMENT

f“

GLEN

0M3:

N. 1-

-

W

w

w— m" F’ .ma,,

-

0!

WEHRLHOSPITAL
HILLS‘DE

a a» -- rm

,

A

fag—«m

V

‘

‘

U

_

"

�DEF'RTMENT OF

'

‘

.jy

[mam-1231.1 Psvcﬂllm
HgLleoE HOSPITAL

.

1'be
,

ﬁg“

-

,_

¥

./'I

/1AW

‘3

I

/

/

ff"? ”'"ZA

1

1

/

.’

I

/

LzlsA/L.
/
/

\

/

I

(

/

,I

s./\_

(

/r"—/lw*&lt;’ ’

i

.—

I!

V

“MM/t
‘

‘

I

,4

g.” x_/,- i“
;/‘_

‘1

I

‘

fA

/

/

j

"j

:J“;¢L.p
(Lx/VL

I

‘

‘

��’

(

.~

4,

�_.%:&amp;: —3

2w

2m_.o%

.

_
m

6‘

3‘5

��r—r-mv—I-

humility but

mum

MW:
Wt:
mm

lemme many

mum

We

33mm

�‘

(a
v

mun
Ramswmmmmmmm
’”

«mmmmm.
311nm

nomad

W
W

mm

W

W

Inward

My W

Waxy Mme.
Slightly

1mm

�”w.” .-,,--a-wvrv~w“7 w—z-‘wv ammwwwvmrmmg~

‘

:memum

�w-mun—um wNW~l www-n-wn

cm

m—WAI'WV-vrwwu

A,.m~mmtrv-mlw-wmvﬂ.wn-memW-¢

"‘xﬁ'rlr¢MrW.m-wywﬂ“~va 4”

..

vn'

(&gt;2

�v

‘nwv—cu. ""v-

'n’“ .

wv— &gt;vIFNIV‘W-ﬂ‘1-My—vlm uwrm.

mW'IUF-ww.i' Ir-vw'I"-¥v‘~1www z;

mm

m—wﬂnmmJ—Fvw’ﬂarxﬂv -uww:vml,m mlx.‘ mW'naM‘s-ﬂreﬁurvv-Iw-‘fwarwmrxlv-Iwumvw

av»-

.,

~rv-

.

��awn-n. "-WYN/E'

; cum—n .1 nu-men—w

- m-v—w

mimmmmv

-..~ w

mnnwm

lg
m.

arr

Wm!

:w

":N..iv-"

.

Wm 'w‘mnw'pmw Wm

at frat-nut

Interinstitutional Differences in

23

aim

Pom-mt

�.mmuw—v m MY

1

“Wu.W, .«nv

.,

r“ ass-rw-mw—w
-

.

W

wmmfn‘w

2?
75

33

100

&lt;20

57

20-39

20
28

79

���n

:v

Vw-“Vu ,v

-_. .y

v

,y.

A“.

”w

—

wwwww~mwwruw :vmimn:

rm:

mrrwmw

Wmmmwwm

mm

.

ﬁrm-row mar—rm“,mwlmrmm‘“

Aw

8mm
.i
xﬂ

62
82

55

35

89

37

29
35

me

-.

37

65

����‘74.?
5634

7r.o

�E

53

65

10.29

3049
i

30

20

80

�79.6

9/

1&amp;7

V?

1

4L

43m

ax?
737

«&lt;97

7;

_

.

?7

I)!

v}.3
fo.o

up
2L

���._

“Nu-u": n- vuw—n-anmwasw“):-.a~—m:wwvwmmwwwmqWn.r:wﬂ-wauwmwmvw-xmv-uwnwnmwuu

‘,

t

i

v

x- 20.

mura-

gown—WW

.n

19

'0

o

11

ﬁg

17

1h

69

28

36

3h

,.

.

11:

71

:u.

ha

60

33

'

20-39

59

.

20-39

5.
'

&lt;20

E

'

20-39

,

5

van-1 ‘w-n— our

man

�wwmmemI

TABLE

Munich

V

XIV

and Duration

of

no

v

.mmtm

am» in awaits].

,rw—mqw

gPu-‘cantz

‘

vamww

Manon
&lt;

W."

12

3

~11

12*

A

23

13

a

87

’

w.~h.‘.w-,

12-15

51

20

22

£5

254

35

8

..

12

21

5h

25

12-15

19

13

33

164‘

9

21

21

w: 12

7h

17

9

may

57

39

h

,

’

“Wm—r

«gV\_..n..w_u_l_...

w.”

_._.._w

MC

16*,

c

���Wm.vwvlp.~ .-

TABIE
1'

.

1'

Score

141'

H

'

30449

33

10-29
30-119

50-70,

m0

10-29

304:9
’0» 0

Nation of

1mm
&lt;

in. Ho

Mimam

ta; Paula
7.11

12+

17

57

V

1“?
0-70

Score and

IV

m
33

‘

26
21

7

5

47h

4f:

1/

1*: Ma?
#3

29
15
33
17

69

6h
77

15

no

38

28

9
31
32

2

5
d4!

4

5!" g 93
US

214

O

h

o

V
4
df

7?
Or
y‘
Y
05

���"

3

.
.

u

r." ~w-wm-aw‘m ' —L~"K'.uuhll a

'V'wlm

m‘wmww.‘

-wmwmm

��M.
+MI
o

I821.

LC]

81.?

K

o

72.7

= 2.

x"

=/.-IO

/:~s

20.9]
22.5
31.0

HH.
55%.

“‘3
$8.6

=4

=5£7

X

P

=

N5

MMHC
ZED

49.4

25.3
22.2.

6!.0

w
=3?
x
/

=/VS

44.7

�������W“!-

Aft-5

p&lt;

.061

N'- wmmm"

‘m'W-mmn“mm rum.

V":I’ﬁwmﬂlﬂhm

1». ::-..

r u'&lt;

����‘18.?

35’]

59,2.
(0.0

.

IA’. ‘2’

O

54,7.

52.7
9’51?

MM (4C.

39%
X’V
5/:

/
1 r.

P ‘

77.0

91.8"

13.5’
39,5-

(47.3

53.8

9,/

.

9.7
7.7

‘

.56
N3
‘

V53

����f

70

2

lé

HEN”

/.. /

{’1’

141.4

'

$29

2

~-

32-

é

.5"

�’&lt;ZZ

_

.

7"
1

I7

'

7

'22

7

HS’

5/

_______2__
.

39

‘

‘

FINN

&lt;7

o

7-—

6

.

__

0

"

3

I

11+
M?! [IQ

5‘

€=N3

5

33

4

7-"

/$‘

‘2.

[If

5'

O

g

I?

a

\\ NS

��W6’m

3

m

mtmGoLﬁ.
REE.
26.

macalo 26.

mam.

mthnnhhmoﬂaimdmtommiw’mo'

Hamnﬂquind,m'mw&amp;m
mu'nm.1,mtmmmwmca1.1.,nc.

lawman
analysis, the «en
Gel.

bum
wmmm.29.
11m col. 29/
will b-

mum-following

1,2,;th
29/6,?3 691.22/3 9.’ cal-dim“ 29/0 1111 m ho m.
5. ma far 29f]...2,3, ,5; 29/63; 29/5,? m and com «:3 an
601. 23 and 601. 26.
aud-u

Inmmamthath.
mum‘s-um.

WW

11:91»th

Bogart-ant at
Lunar Psychiatry,
amino‘nybomm
um,
61m
Oaks, I. I.
nmm. Rommel,
1: than. my difficulties um: um. any“, I my 3:. roach-d a mm.
3—7”, Monica 235.

this

mm,
My“.

to: Dr.

shun}: yum-I.
nth-ma. '3. mp1, mm.

�iua1apuruhoxnclcnt Aspu¢1n or

311.21 L. Kain. rn.n.*,
ﬂhﬁﬁauAul

Ptrtiaitriu trcaﬁnautle

In: rulxauu, r119.

51.5.1, ra.n.

tad
ﬁlm yank,

«a. Buymrtntut a:
r:«. 01¢:

8.3.

Expurmsaneax Purch1a$ry, 3111116.

cult, 1.1., I.!.
AAdnt 11 putt. h; ‘11:! 31.209: at tug Iattsutx Ianiisato
acuith.
and 150 1.3113
Pabltc Buntth

innpitnt.

v.5
8.5115 lonrd.

at 3.11:1

strvincz

”unﬁt!
Unna¢uhurot§n
$113!:
Innis:
the
unaporuﬁitn-ox
if
It:
ti.
Icalth 6.31:: :31 1h. c.r. uonniusar ﬁaaorstl aaapatux 1:
¢9m313

cratnthllr

aukunmloduuﬁ1

; it ’I&amp;

31v1u1on
Srozgatﬁtgdrutts

13

2/63

.

at Ptyuhtntry, nontuttaro ﬂcnpltal,

�In innit liuﬁr or sun luv
pupuxmtttn, Rtlltacthmnd 5a!

83";

ynxuhzutrta patient

ildlilh rtpnrtaa atnatttc£ut

rolntioulhtpo bitumen In innavzdnaz‘a yactt£¢a in tha tuuinl
clams Itrusﬁura 3nd tan yrgv:13aan

at trantnd illausu.

typun

or dilﬁﬁﬁltd aka-rduru Inn kind. and ﬂurutiau a: puruhtntvxt

trvutunut aﬁstuxstgwod

(

).

Char indimutté,

tar txuupla,

tht§l‘hig§ur vruyirttiu «f 1¢§nr alutn puﬁtinto in troutnunt
wart alanattata
yumitnma

at

It

purnhntaa

uppur 91:5:

nae pcvtunnzity

will. attairteuntzr high.»

pmn¢

patiuuit Viv. eluaattioa at nauto‘ic

etuurdtra. Far all vatltnts, psyahqﬁharupy

no: Ippitid 1n dalyriyoriiunutqu htnh itarnqa ta twp.» «Int.

pattua‘a. within «tan

dimgnﬁat&amp;e granﬁ, yqyuhatharnpy was

apylzcd unﬁt-afﬁne in npm§r ulna. yaiicmﬁa tad urinate

ﬁhtrtptnn tn lunar ulna: nuha‘ntn‘ ﬁiaimmr

It.

ligaxr1canuu

at ¢uinanic fantara

at traitius paruannal dgtaralaiag thn

and

availability

abnorvgd disrurauman

tiuld at! ht uxtludaﬁ in $301: Iﬁudiii. to tutu

ﬁho #010

u!

�-2.
ﬂﬁﬂihl

fact!!! in tap $r¢ttuaa£ at hutpttniistd patinuti

nadir noadition: axnluaing sh. ruutara a: p¢ti¢nt'n rtuinata
Ind

availability 0! trcltnuatn,

an: «adtriakta

it

a

yaticnt can‘t: try: aurvay

3111114. unnpitul in 1957*

yitti. t Viritty at triatntut awn...
ind Irzouio thortpiua

at.

1st. at thﬁlr ability

$9 pay.

In

inglndinn pszuhothtrtpy

available to

«11

pgtiautn r.¢nrd~

an abachtd $hut nan. odnaatsﬁn and 913:.

a:¢n£t1u:utly aaluciutod ﬁith ﬁbﬁiﬁ.

Quin hog.

#3

at htrth

tran‘naut, duratiun

a! unﬂatt:11nnii¢a, altnzaul datahlrgc IvalunQiun
daggnunta (

i. 91n¢r, iar'tgnwbara patiantu

tarsal uduaattca

wurn mart

warn

with

ﬁnd {a

lit‘lu

Itkolr tn ruccsv. qu‘tiu thurtpy.

var. kupt in tha hnspital for nhurtar pcrioda at tint,
aura titan rttaa .0 rancvurgd «r

gawk

Saerth

And

an ditchurga.

In nanié;at. tho rsuncar, buttot uduoltud and n.ttvc born
paﬁtonta

airs

at ertsuunt,

stimn raeatvud puy¢hothurtpy an

wot; haapituiisad

it.

001: turn

tar tong.» parioas tad rancivud

�.3.
t3: yearc: cliniuul diauharcu rutinut.
Show: obsorvitivna

attrautypr :culitarnin

3

rarlactoﬁ
ﬁnal.

C

v.3.
1n

£139

raintud to noniurau or

lubjnet': roaponaea to

). Bichar

F

a nadiriad

asorau wart unloointcd

with ditgnaicu at 1nv¢1utianal payahnlis, uhartnr parioda or

hanpitaliuutiun. and»:
tharnpy (

It

).

who

h$shmr

inoiélubc a: roturrul tar nouutia

canclndod

thtt the atroets

patterﬁa
trulﬁmant
at aauiua algal (us dutinud

my

an ysyahiutria

Halliaatho£a

tad analluh). tau, advantiaa birthplncn and dogreo at statue»
ﬁypy

«tru

33%

u

result «I aconontc itcigtl or tvuiluhilitr a:

uuagilttan
an:
«luau.
trnitpsnt

wan

tha$ the oblervntionu

taﬁptutiou.
rtrttcﬁioa at ditturunt naagl a:

8.2.

:

tian

and uxpruntian.

It

conuu31¢5w

u:a poztnlatai that anhsucta cf 108a:

would
ROI.
313th
:ud
uduaattau
1001::
fortian
Ioninl ulucunl,

in
maker
nou~varhu1,
ar
mangory
lynptunu
ninirunt
trcqututly
puttnrnas while uyper 015a: subjunts vauld
of .xprnulion.

utiliip

vurhal :¢nnt

�.3...
A

n¢e§nd

titaa to

ﬂho

intirprttatlon, navthr, rc1:tnd th:
tratinaat philauophicn

tntiauul luadura

and

It wan

anﬁ paraoanal.

lantiiutioau what: ynyuhathhrapr

Wﬁﬁ

absurvuu

;ttitudu¢ at 13:81“
nuggsstod that in

ilxhly vstund, uypcr

Ginsu iudﬁvidunln wauld rauntvu inordinatu ruprtlcnta$$¢n in

ski! ﬁhtrnyy. ﬁanilnrly, dinahara. ovtluntiouu ¢ad duration

at hanyattlxaatioa ﬁtnld

bu

aflostté

195?

«tat:

at dittcring anciul ain‘t.

unpnatntionn for individutln

to twat this

by nitraronaan in

uu¢¢nd aucg¢utiou w. doaiicd

Hillaido Iiﬂdy; to naplvy

¢h¢

to rtpcat uh.

It». lrotudurnig

Ind uon*

¢h§arvati¢na
«ataad
the
to
ta ta: oth¢r iantitntiont,
currently
shn

0.). nannincur Ronarinl Boupttul a:

laaaachaaatta Manta: noalth

Tupakt tad tho

Conﬁar 0: Boston.

In theta thlﬁt

hauptinlu, inlﬁitutiaunl ptraonnvl nfxuot similar ttﬁitadus

in trsatuuut tad education. Eaah

I fall tin:

Inpurwinory

stat:

1a a $¢¢ohins

hasxital with

uni tutivu rtnnureh dapurtneat.

thuy amphaaiaa yaychnnng13t1enXXynarianttd glychntharaﬁy but

�m5.u

yrovide uﬁhor traataantn 1nolud1ng nonttxu ﬁhortpiea «ad

aetivp pragrlnt of utiiuu thurnyy.

Bach

’trosuos chart-

terﬁ traatmant of voluntary watiuuta, data

tedial aura

39%

provide gun»

ta arav their paﬁiont papulntian Ira:

and tend:

aimilur an; graupa, excluding ehtldrun and thy aunilc ug.d.
ﬂﬁjar inatiuuhznual dxtrcronaun 3:! gain in thoir cantata
or iinnnaial anppart, airfarent institutional policies rnnnrd~
Sag

lanath at stay

ﬁnd

ntﬁur¢¢tru. rho Huanuohuanttu Rental

Health neuter (Mﬁﬁc) in a publin

Itﬁﬁt tundu: Killstdc Hospital

institutien suppartud

(RR)

1: a nan~pvot£t veluntary

hospitui with a ns3ar partinn of its incanc durlvnd
and other aonmunity funds; tad Kanningur

pr1v¢ta inntitutiun.

taliuntiﬁn, «5:1.
more

Hﬁ

at

33

tic: nit;

nanpital (HIE) in a

ha; I 90 day limit for haapiw

I flotiblo on. yaar retina;

kaharal attatuda. At urn $nd

@ntpntiunt ulxaia urn

while

Thu Hana

by

maﬁa

trail: trailnhla

t

and HIE,

I

dty hospital and

to all vatznntag

thdrela no 43a heapital and I uhopt tutu, limitld

�45.

tttovenrw proevnu is availabla to
2h: printry ruaaun

I

tun patinnts.

far ouloettng tun tattitutaonu,

havov¢r, lay in thy axpnctutiou thnt thuy vauld murvu pattants

of differing acuinl alumnus {nae £5) lad that differuneui in

this dtutaiicn vauld

bu roxlnatad

ta.

ta

trau$nnnt wurinblaa.

rho speeifiu purpato cﬂ tutu stuﬂy wt: ta dotcraina papilla

t1en dittnrcnaas betuuan tun ﬁbrin mustttnttant with raaptct

to anclnl alman, :39, education and

F

utorc,

na&amp;

to rolutn

thaaa pttiunt chlraatcrtatica to sho trnntnnnt Ouvtnblun of
type at treatmant, durntian or hospi$a111nt1an, diagnonau
diuehawg. twilvatinn.

Qua

�.1.
REEBOB

A11

:

pattoatn in rcaidcnco ia‘th¢un tnaﬁiﬁutiana

givun dutu in January 1959 aura utuétod.

R8

had

mane

on

whiz. urn tan

auuhar
thoaa
a
at
at
duly,
stall
patients
veluntlry

Vtrt sultanua by an: uaurt: ta thu institutioa tor

puynhiutria ovuluutian, or a chranis aahiuophrqula granp
udn1t$¢¢

:nat.

fro.

in...

a

ottto hospitll for a Ip‘oific roaanrah pro-

putisuta wit: oxuludud tron thy viva: bocauuc

at thiir nan~vo1unttry ataxia.
ntltnd a:
350h

putt-nil ﬁt an,

113

patient

wan givun

The

100

study popu1¢tloa cou-

at urn tad

1h. culitnrnSn

P

cauln

95

It

(

nuns.

) on

the

agatgnntaa dtxt. Paticntt' roeovdn aura analyutd ﬁtter a

ported at 15 nontha. which was the out~o££ vaint far the

analyai: a! hut trontm¢nt vnrzuhloa. tor the dntcrninnuiau
of

toaitl clans, tau nailingthuad 2~ta¢tor

inaux

wua uncd (

).

�1. nutheaolegle Aaggata

it ﬁt:

tuna uhlurvod thtﬁ thc vary tautor: an var:

inturcltoa in studying afroatﬁd thi aollcotiou tad organizt~
tin-u o!

tn

dun. Via-tutu” in “iguana“: a:

tarp: of

trantmant and axprausiens auad far dtuguoaia and trottuant
awnluatann, mad: aanlyauu

attriault,

tnﬁ rcguirad ooastdsrublu

sanrtion for unitarnity.
I}

1'-

at

u

ut_!r, taint:

Among

thy tast1§u~

had
a
tha
that
the
dtslgnataon
pattnnt
for
crituria
tionn,

rocuivcd 'gnyahothurtpy' aiztavad narkndly. asking autturuity

in cluas1rieat1nn difficult.

At nrﬁ‘ﬁaychatherapy win dot1g¢

nttad ta trautaunt udn1n1;tar04

atnfr paychsatrtst, tar
additional

i...

on a

which tha

proaariptian basis by a

puttont

was obtreod

tn

acasinnu with tbs psyahittric rwsia-nt wart

cansiﬁarud part at routina adninintrative pati-nt earn. At
an psywhath¢rtpy Vt! dcfiaﬁd

at trcatncnt anatiana with

psychiﬁtria rcaiaﬁnt. 8‘33: puywhiatraat: do not treat

#hn

�.9.
rationia dircotly, but ruatrlntud that! activitius to uup'ru
ﬁtting the reticent th.rnpia$s. At the naac,

1n

centrtat,

paychotherapy Ina designatcd as a function at many diaciyliuua

.

payohiutric rustduuta, nurses, lidl¢§1 atudent¢, 3601.1 uorkorn
3nd

piyuhalag1atu. Formal rueards at sneh nonstona warn ”Gt

ruutﬁnc inaludgd in tun patannt': rauerd and to accurtttn
watch

patiynts were ranazving puynhethorapy,

v1.3 the r-uadcnt in ohnrgo or each

ta intcrw

stat.

Thor: aura individual

b} migﬁuouia:

we hmd

institutional

aestza 18:10:, uhzah and. nonpartaans dirtianlt.

dinu~

At urn

ata¢hnrgo diagnoaaa unployid tn: multiglq clanuificntian

rsynhiﬁtrin
Asaouantian whila both an tad
nyittn.at tho shaving»
nanc rallawad unitary indiganoua nywtims.

at diagno¢ua tron urn
goaﬁad convuruiona

it.

savcrul ax‘mplas

Itutud in tabla , with *3: angu

inté catcgoriaa campartble ta tn. athar tun

inatitutiom, providing,

how/var, an muvoidnbu sound: or

d:stortian.. @iuilnr abaarvuﬁiona hit» bton rapartad
and

hit asaacintas

(

) who

h&amp;v&amp;

by Paanntniak

chain thnt diaganac: within

�411“

saniax aluau unngupition at thi karma institution: (Enhlt

kt urn tho ycyulatioa

artdoninantty‘uppar c1;ln with

wan

par cant of pntiuntn in annaea I at

all»: 7. I»:

«luau xv, and man. in
5% HR

82

i:

uni! can viticut

maﬁa!» «Inna

praauuinttcd

31th acct patients in clnauan XII ind xv (éﬁ par cent}.

At-HHHG,

57

It,

).

pctianta «are «htafir from tha luwur a1u3;aa with

pix eont la olnsans
b) 532:

Rhurc

uué v.

XV

at:

an

ailturnaat in tan inutitatianal

papnlnﬁioan in mg: diatribntxan. a rung: afloat fiﬁh sh»

putiuutn an». undur the :3: at twnnty and on: quarter warn

:orty

yunru

at oldgr.

a} manuatagg:

was

populations éitrared 1n adunnﬁianal

nttainnunt, with patienga at

tiau
gt

ﬁhsn thguc

3x36

it

KFH

having worn yanra

cﬂucau

«use. Whit: k1 gar cunt at tho patiunﬁu

ruilod ta camylcto high auhacl, only

an and 23 ptra¢nt

a:

at

Krﬁ

did

sat graduxta.

32 par aunt

at

aux» Sanding

in.

cauuxntunt with the anciul clan: diffnraugt, claws the ceaiul

�113 8

Intur:uut1tu%1onat countriinu. for aeasnplrahalosiaul
Viritb1¢a

m

512.

2.

51

an

23

3.
h.

17

3h

13

1

3h

29

5.

0

5

28

19%

19

22

1.

anti-1
G1!!!

26

Q

315

7%

”we
3%

.

I

9-.001

‘

59

58

333

22

23

33

23

32

bl

um
m.

2.2.15

51:

51

a9

16 *

23

1?

1o

radorn

to«29

51

33

20

Sowhﬁ

hi

90

38

Sa~7a

&amp;

18

a:

Ag.

a “121 5
d£~8

39.39
he *
4.12
&gt;

12-3.9
d£*h

phn'ﬂ'i

,2,

mi

.1

n~-0§

$g9.2
;~.aox

�.1a.
alas» unnauru 1;, in part, buncﬂ an t6uani&amp;§n.
a)

P

Squat: 91:2.»¢ue¢¢ in tha diatrihution u:

warn ubaurvc&amp;‘

Fixiyuaun put

buluw 30. and chi?

It

In cautraat.

I aaala,
A: ax

tight par

«an%

at urn pntanutu

fifty pi!

want of the

had accrua

watiaatl

9:!"

ma

an“:

a:

50

at mart.

hna ? acorns in the

hwe

in: diaign «I an: study includad
within stab

r supra.

sunk wath snarot mf an ar abuva.

tad rurtyutwo par «ant

"hum:

had

aunc tvauﬁy gar cunt uura halww 30 on tha

31461: runga bntwaaa 30 «ad

tho

r Ewart;

m

nxnuinntion at

m myohutric an» 1.:

inititntiaa, ta wall

as butacun

inatiiutioat.

tutu uiupuriteaa pruvua difficult, in putt buaauuo a! difrtrw
aueid in thy dotinitiun a: ﬁn: paychiatrac variabluu, ﬁnﬁ,

in part, huaauau shins variables ranged so widuxy that

«gnu

paraﬁln answer: arxtﬁria anmlé «at b: autdrniuad. Far
umnmpla,

‘o-conpart tautitutican tn relatimn tu Innath a:

�«13‘-

htlpitnl atty, vuriout eut~¢t£ poriaal any: triod‘but nan:
sllnuut tar

at

165
At
than
luau
«.11
3150:.
urn,
cqulvslout

putiauta audﬁr ho yuan: ringinnd 15.0

thin

7

non‘hi.

At sane, 70! of All

Ind 39$ aura than 12 unathi.

runnintd 1.3: than ? ninth». ﬁnd 63 mar. thtn

patilnti

12 manthn.

Aauarﬂiugly, amphuaxa will bu pluaad on 1h; dirtcrunaul
btawcan

institutiana, with cttatiau

wt rolcvnat intruuinuttw

tatloatl rolntianthiyn.
g)

saw

pnt1«nta

439

at xru

i

m:

“autumn raw

yuanivnd aauutiu thlrnpy than &amp;t tan nthsr

tau insﬁltutaani.
Manning.»

'

Gauaurrintly a twnllor parcuntasu of

patiautc warn attuned a: rac¢ivla¢ payuhothurnyy,

with 3 lawn; aunts: (36 vcr want) r-euivtng niltnu turn. a:

trtntaaut.
an

At

KR

that. antiautt

Hamid

hut: bo:a «Inluitiud

ﬁtting rgenived payahatyarupyﬁ x: can cuntruata tun pita

owning. or

338
aamatac
knurayy,
reoniving
patient:

ahwvu

oxanttieuntly lass than wither at tho ﬁthur tun inatztntiano.

�.11..

niltvu
,

(13 Ethics

yarsittin:

a «catwalk

Wﬁthxu wank

it

and plyﬂhﬂthlvariiﬂ wwrc cauhtuié.

a: aunntlu :né

taltituiion.

trontaant at urn

and F

?ut&amp;unta why unto yuan:

at

pny¢h01¢¢1¢a1 thuruyivn.)

nan wan waistla to nu10¢t£ua

near: as xru

$nd

ER

(Tablo

).

uhnwa F a%oru VI! low rc¢c$v¢d

pnyuhothurnyy with srcutnr trﬂqutaay $han gataouti who Vdra

olétr

or vha haé high F acoraa.

Enua;t1¢nn1 achiavcnoa‘ and

innit} eiaxn ﬁia not nigniticantlr atfcct soltutxan at
’30::

it any

hauyéhnix

Ana»: ﬁhn yuyohtatrxc Ulrimblmt, within naah

aitgnasia

twia%*

wax

inttitut&amp;cn,

higﬁly
tun want
rulatvd varinhlo ta aaltetxon

at itcn%annt.

91l¢hl¥3ﬁ ovuluntiaa

honpltuliuutana at 33

ﬁnd name

it

urn and aur‘tiaa u:

“are :13. rolatcd

ﬂu

saloation

at troatucnﬁ. than, aanataa truntaint an: :ataataﬁ for
pa‘iiuﬁa clataiiicd nu sanitaphrania and attaativa dincrdlr

hart nttna

ﬁhnn

urn;
pafahaaanrntia.
Lt
that. «littnd an

puﬁlunia rccaivtnc

lattiiﬁ arnatntnt

(prudnninaatly that:

�’15.
alaauid an nahisuyhrtntu) rililwﬂﬁ dalnhnrsc rating: at
minus.
pmyuhnﬁhcruny
rn¢a1v1nc
p¢i$¢nsa
than
ngtuprovoé
With

hyapaﬁnlu
acupztuzx:xta¢n,
ptticuta
dtrtﬁiﬁﬂ
tn
a:
rtcnrd

ﬁnnﬁ

tar langcr ptrlldi
b)

wtrn

that: rtcuivtn: nunutie thcrﬁgy.
eoaniwtrnb1u dittortunau

g'

vurﬁ #huwn bﬁtwnan

«a. ﬁbrin inuttﬁatﬁvna with waapaat so

paxatuﬁ‘a lungth a!

stir

3;

(rahlw

31a pasiuaﬁa VI?! han-

ta§a¢wt,
with 65$ 0: puﬁ¢¢atﬂ runniniag
pi‘nxasud
naathn 0r aura, «savanna

tud-unly

5

it

31

9a: aunt

that: ut

gut auu$ a!

H336.

93

it!

tar

twmlvu

the 33 patinaﬁa
aqua} uﬁny

Inuit:

at

thy

while twawthirat

EB

nxuvun
and
batuuua
savtn
ﬁﬁ!
stony

a:

win
within
éiﬂﬁhﬂraﬁﬁ
warn
3836
tan
watasnta

munQKa

a:

heapiﬁaliautiong
urn uaﬂ
ﬁn

I! at.

wan

its

luadh 9t haupi§altﬁtﬁ$¢n

for tha 1nugust veriad. At

sauznl tunttr unit alumni: rtlaadd
~~

yauutcr yatxcuﬁn rmmniutns

Ovary :50

1Ith,

hawavcr,

that:

�.16..

nt

RIB rammiuud

lanai:

£hnn

at

an

at

Indand, an:

mane.

intnriuntihutiaanl diffuranous voru :9 grant that

: putttat

in the oldest as. group an: no». ltkniy to ho bospittlisud

far trait. nanth: or
yuanguat tau stony

mart

at

tt

Hana.

urn thin war. pntinnta in an.
At urn tad an

tier.

wan

tile t

aignificnnt relations batwenn durutiau a! honpitnlisutinn and
F

acara, tho lave: r uaora being atoneit‘od with lanai: in.»

pitil atty.
a) gigggniggu
1: thaw;

t1.

1n

rtblo

2h. diutribntion at diaehurgc attsnotnu
.

tar atatisttecl analysis three diagnaln

ﬁery
undue uabtsophranin, n£rautivv ditardﬁru 3nd
grvnpiugn

psyvh¢nouroaaa Iﬂﬂ ynrsonultty «Quaraorn.

portiona warn similar for the an and
tha

HFK

muse

rho é:ngnoci§a prou

povulnttons, but

pt%1cata warn rngurdoé as having raver urinativa and

Iahiaophrania éiuordcrs, but

I larger haiku:

or paymhanoutotia

or ehnrtatar dixardaro.

Intrttnetxtationul analyntn

chauoa

this at as both as.

�.1?.
and 3

suort ”ﬁr. rwlntnd to diﬁgnoaiu: at 3:3 as. clan: of

tan sonata tgntart In: volataa to dinauouing whiz: at
nuns

a: tha senial variablnu war.

trig

vurinblgs, dingnoaaa can signifia&amp;ntly

so rolntcd.

haupitnl ta unleatioa or trottmcnt

&amp;nd

or

maﬁa

its

rolttcd

payouts-

1%

«.mn

durution at haapittilo

nation; Ina val: at an tn aiaahtrgt ovuluutioa (gag:

£££E£)~

a) 91353:: 0 Evuiuatiunt In sack heapital, nest patiouta

‘fi urtlnttud It
A?

the time a! disnharga as ”ingrovodﬁ (Tabl.

).

338. hatovnr, a higher ptreuatuga (19%) at patisntu warn

ratad g. *uninprav¢d* and only I ainala puticnt wt: callud
'rucovnrod* er “hunk impru§ad'. rho highant porcantago at
*rccovaro¢*

at "Inch impruvod' rutxnga

(28%) and

thy lu‘nt

haunt! at ”unimprovaéﬁ (165) wort $9334 at ”386.
Anulyann within uaoh

it

an and

Mann

thqrt

vitae haiku: than
1117

institution

ﬁne a teuéancy

ahavad vuriuhln

rliﬁltl.

for clan: pationta ta

ywungcr ones, but thc

b0

reunita urn Itntiatiaw

significunt only at an. At a!“ that. run

nu

appositu

trand, vita 014.! putxautt'uara liknly ta b. rutcd unimprovti.

�__._._.._

u—mmmW__—m

��j
w
-

49:25

{0‘70

W

“i

a7

-31

2

5“

”iii—“T-

7

'5

_

��f
".
’qg"

A

comparactu

a:

Parahantwio truntnuut

ta

rant: Ybiuntary ntipstull

nan-t

an.

an,

Plum", nu mums, rum.
lathgaxnl 81‘301. ?h.n.
mu

m:

’bwu

Buapitul.

nu, ma.

Dmrtnoa‘ a:
ta.
#103

6th., L.I.,

znpnrtnnntux Plynhiuiry. laliuido

l.!.

II~2992
thy
Inttunal
Inntt‘utu
grant
a:
by
u.a. rublxu ﬁnnlth survtc.; &amp;ad tho liuuau
mﬁuilth
at Xantul
ﬁuuaiy nuns:1 ﬂutlth 30:96.

a$ntt$ at tho lansnahsnntts luatnx
I:
it.
‘3‘ 0.3. Hummingur ﬁbuuriul ﬂutpiﬁnl 1n

In. comptruiatn

ﬁnalth Busty: an!

gratutully ntkuaulodx¢d.

Aﬁdraau:
rrtltat
3.1. $7. 1.1.

*

'VI:

3/5!

niviuion a: rayuhautnr. Hau‘utinrc Bouptttl.

�tn thoir 331$: at

ﬁhw

It»

ﬁavuu

ptrﬁhtatrau patilnt

ﬂailingahund
and anilinh rapovtla Itgntttnaui
populnilon,

valuisuauhipn baiwaun in xsdaviaumx‘: position in ﬁn.

tilill

$ti§tad
alum: ptruoturc Ina £3. pravuluu¢t at
illnaua.

twycu

of attsuaaud atturamru and kinds and duratica.¢r payahAatrtc

truutnuat :anantuiarad ( ). tkgr thattntna. for umaupla.

that

;

hiahor prupowﬁann a: ions: aliin patient. in tvaatncat

were alnncixtua Il~pl¥¢hﬁ§ﬁi whaln‘uignzrinnutlr

hithi? ptﬁ~

.purttons a: uppar ulna: p;t1¢nth var: alanuaxand an nuuraiio
and

puritanlitr dailrdora. It! all

at:

inpldrmﬁ

is ﬂiuyrnportaau:sity

pnthonﬁu. acyuhutharupy

high

ditrtli with at:

ugyuw ¢1§Is

pnyuhoni
ouch
within
«inunnutat Iran»,
gutiyutaa

thirty?

tduxnzut.r¢d

um.

its;

Otitn ﬁt uppur exist p;t$amtt

tad otntatu thnrupmuu in lunar 01a:- uabacatu.
who

cianiti‘nnst or iﬂiﬂﬁliﬂ tnc‘uvu

at Granting
«avid nah

pavuunnnl dutaruinluc

b. txaludod

1a

and

uvtilabaltiy

it. obntrttd altxaruucau

taunt iﬁudaua. In tact tau rﬁlu a:

�.1.
watts: raster! in tin trontuntt u: hutpitalssd&amp; vutiantc
'udur otndttllai quludtnl tut (natty; at pustanﬁ‘a £1uauuei
and

availability at trttﬁuautly

an! auditinknn

t

pISai.

patlunﬁ acnaun sip: auvvqy

at lillntdu niuptint

1a 1957.

in $38: b0!»

vnriuty a! ﬁrnntucut nudcu, Snalu¢1n¢ ptyﬁhmshuruyr

or;¥nsc
aha
thnrwpiom

irt

a: ﬁhutr ability ta

§u¢u

u

wt dbauruud

availahiu ka

all

patauntu rustedn

why.

that use, Odiatilin

and 911a;

uf‘birth acre

’atgatritaﬁtmy automiftid with «intau «I trtutuon£. duration

at hospitalautttua,

arts:

(

)a

ultu1u¢x ninthnrtu cvnltatiom taa «luau

furnauﬁubnru
nanny.

pattcn‘. with

littlu

Input!

giauttiaa war. at». minim: ta rucuavu taunts: taartpy, viva
taps in

in. hatpattl it»

churﬁar yariod. ﬂ! $aun, and new.

nt‘uu ﬂirt vital in BIDUVIIid

aw

unit tuprtvcd on.d&amp;nuh¢rtc.

In Ionﬁrnta, tau yuuasur, buttur cﬁnuutod and natavm burn
pasiunsa at»:

titan ria¢1th

purchaihurupy :3 tan saxo town

a! trau*uou§. aura h¢3p£i511tvd 1hr teaser piriodi and tuuuivad

�.3.
ﬁhc‘poovur

ciiniail

dinuﬁuran rﬁtingg.

Ehita uthrvnﬁttun turn 31:. ruxattd ﬁo'nauturat a:
tiawnatrvy a: rurllctnd in nubaoais' vacuum... to a uyda~
{10¢ Gnltforuta

I Butt.

(

).

Haghnr 2

gotta: war: aasoaann

tad v1$h ¢$uau0unl at tuvulutttaul psychouta. thawing purtoau

a: htuyitnltl¢tian.

and

I

highnr Lnuidcacu at votnrral 2i!

aquatic thtrnpr ( ). 1t nun nanola¢u§ thnt thu uttuuta a:
aoat‘z class. :31 Udllltilﬂ, biuhpinau and dcaroo at clarcaw
Sway an

purchaatrtc ﬁruuinnat patturuc war. not a rouuit

t:

ataaautn :Iu‘¢ru or awnainbilitw a: trunungut ilﬂnic 9a:
dbﬁurvutiuna
war.
3:3:tnttan val thus thg

iudtviaunl astrircnnnl in
and

«uprtslian.

X‘

month

&amp;

ratlcutiou ax

a: Iiuytutaon.

nununaaaattan

uni pcotulatcd that uwh3.¢tu

t: taunt

cocinl #Iﬁllﬂﬂ, lacinr‘wduuatiaa uaa turuttu birth wtuld
aura trtquuutlr nanatalt lympiduu in nanwvorbul. tanner: a»

II“? yt‘turuu,
nﬁtn:

whtlo upvav alas.

If «upruisitnv

Itbsattl wall uttiiiu varbnl

�“a...

t

aanaud

Lnturpritutiaa, huuuvor. ruluiud in; ubturutw

taunt tn tht ﬁrnnﬁusnﬁ philaaaphiul tad xsfttada; ct talttm
tnsaaunl lucdaml and yawnunnul.

tilt:

audzv1d3313 nudﬂ runnivo

It Uta

aaacaﬁtod

that Ipptr

inardiautn vupr.uwntahi¢n in

psrahnthcrupr in 1a:t&amp;%autoan what. yaymhntharanr vat highly
vuluca. ataxitrly. ﬂiﬁlhtrtﬁ.§VIlﬁiﬁiﬁnﬂ and durailau a:
knapitnlintﬁxan Imuld ha i33cttud
u!pn¢$nt1¢nn tum Sﬂﬂ1VSdn§11
20 tons

195?

allllléi

my

ditturaunh: in Ital!

a: disrurtn; social «la...

that scannd augguutioa an anulaad to ragga: the
ntnay unplmrin: uh.

u&amp;nc

pvuaaﬂuria ind nan»

aurr.nslr t0 «stand it» ohnurvut1¢na to
tun 6.3. naauaugim armorial Hatpataz

at

sun oﬁhur
Ebpaku and

inatttn‘ltuu.
tha

untanahucnttl nausnl Hﬂ‘lﬁh cuntlr a: vastnn. In that. ﬁhrao

haupitnln,

initttutianll piraunuol stitch :intlur tttttudai

13 trauﬁnunt and udusntxon.

a

full

llth

13 a

itaahta: haupttal with

twig auplrvilory nt¢££ ﬁnd aetiva tumansh dvvarinont.

rhuy lﬂphﬁtiﬁt purehtanalrtaﬁallywtrltntnd pnyuhnihurnpr but

�«6m

H35Iﬂﬁ

111

vulnatarr. nanlt paﬁa-ntn tn rnitdauou in than.

inntituianuu an a civun dt£a in Jtuutry

ﬂail: urn lad

it

than.

it

1959

vurt ntuditd.

an had volum$arr-patxtatn only, a

R836

wart tcnigund hr

It‘ll

unnbur

in. ataxia tar yuyuhittrtc

avihnitin. or wurt sawhnrt at I otwouiu anhinwyhrunac ntntu
haugi‘sl Iraﬁg ﬁrtnliurrnd to! I sycatriu riannrth prajutt.
that¢.paidnn&amp;a war. umoluand tram thn aiudr hanuvn.

a: that:

nanwvulnniary abutat.

2h: study pnpuln$1un-etnnlctud at 113

p‘ttnuan uﬁ an, 190 at

K18

titan

satin

£ha

ﬁnittaruia

F

In!
C

9E

at maﬁa.

) an tho

zach pa‘tau‘

8t!

datttugtta aatg.

lithtnon Illihl taint in. knit-utn‘ rauurdn var: nualriad.
Jar an. dutarutnataoa at :cetul exams, «an Hullsngahaua
ﬂoatatar iadax

may

ntnd (

).

�“a.
Autthur tritium

of
the prtlnnoc

it:

atrtur'nt ruataruh

1‘
tan
itau
rcutzaau.
alaninit
altacttu:
grnuraut,

sh.

¢£

nuns
ﬁx:
at
pavaunt
vutiantn
at
tucaty
upgrauanutaxr
aurrny.

wart ah:9a1u.lly 111 tad use Eta: hunptiuliﬁad far ulny
Sﬁtﬁ a uwtap uuula «at annualir hnwu hunt

inst tiny

had Esau tranbturrnd tram

yturt.

in this hecpitu!

inothtv skats.1uut1tu~

taou.tuw a Ip¢aiul uindr.

rung.

it

vat anon apparant that £ht Vim: finiﬂfi

war. inturauiod an Isndyiua ntrtcind thy atllua‘aon

at

nnﬁ

in
unite
we».
prdhlann
ﬂat
éxtn.
spaaarie
urgiutswtiaa 9!

st.

varin‘xouu an ﬁnnigan*xnua a: twp: a: troatuuat and exprnualcaa

qud tar diuguonin

trantn-ut uvnlun‘iau watch aunt .n:1:~

W!

at. disfiault
3)

and

dualguuﬁtn:

and viqntrid caaiiéovnblu wxorttau

it‘s a puttuat

than; sh: institutiouu,

tut

uni»

m "um:

for

riuutv.d "unrahoth¢rupy* dittlrud

making untSQrISty

in clu:u$ti¢¢t$nn

�.9.

ditttailt.

as an.par¢hoth¢rupr

was

davicuuttd nu trus‘uunt

atlzulctornd on a yrnaurlyiton basis by

tar thigh sh.

A

aunt: raruhtatrilt,

pgﬁicut nu: churned an additional (cu.

with tho ptyahtgtrle retidant were uonntﬂursd part

at rﬁutiuu

ti 3! wuywhn‘hornpy ill

ulntntntrgttva pntxant oarc¢
to triatuont nunaionn with

Station.

ﬁha

dart‘ud

psychiatric rtnidcut. stuff

paywhintritta did not tract pgtiunts diraetly, but raitrtutod

thair sativitiom ta aapurviatns tau roaidouﬁ phywialnnn.
Sb. lﬂﬁﬁ parehatharupr

Wtﬁ

a.t1gngz¢a g: a function

Aluethiuoi-a~ parohtntrzu roatdouta. pmynholagittu.
andauui
xtudnnta. Formal
workura. nuracu and

station‘ war: not vau91noly ineiudod
and ﬁn unaariaiu which
v0 and to
‘b)

1n

at uni,
«#6131

rieard. a: tank

tau paeicut'n roger!

patients wart rucotviag puythvthqripy,

tutorviov $30 ruttdun‘ in chart. or 'uah oats.
&lt;

Itylaa his»

5%

“atlas Individu31 ialtitutionnl diuunontla
mud: uomparioanu

atrxicult.

At $13 dinuhnrgs

dtgtnvuua anplaymd tha mulﬁapln awniuuﬁtve data lﬁhlﬂﬁ

�.19.
ruccnuundol by

it.

Annrtcnn Payuhtntrzo Attestation uhtlo

tellauad unitary syatcun. 5.1.9:: nuanplou

boﬁa an :nd luau

at ﬁtnznalun Iron ark 3:. liutad in Tani. I, with

our sug-

gIatId uouvorniGnn into cathccrie: «caparablt to th. athar
tua tuctztntlnna. 1h... canvosataau prcvido, hnwavur. an
unuvotdahlt Iﬁﬂtﬁ. a: dis#¢rt1¢n. (sinilgr obgorvutian: htva

erortud

boon

’allntntok

by

and

dioata thus itaananuu within

us: anneaiuucd

$hn «an;

(

) who

in-

taut1tut1¢u arc 3130

vulatruhln to individunl dittornuaas nuang nxgntntra.;

‘ “U ”G“ .v."~.-ﬁ
fabll I
’

In

a)

Hunt vnracd

:13 an:

,

tin

'

a: I

rovunnn

I

Rating: at zupravon

in forum: ;nd actual. in. dischargc 1:113:

tripattita

with n tapnrgtc urulugtian

churicturolocxual and axudrcn: chuncsa.
global rbtluca 13 vital

txihutlnn of ciah

it

tacit:

HR

it

tar snaial.

and Kane had

In! dittiuult to saunas tan anu-

0! ‘ho Runniastr 3:06am

(rail: 1!).

�.11.

tar tux;

lwu&amp;y

sh: Hiuningar

ta ta. slahnl raﬁiugt or

rating at: ealwnrad

syndrome

an and 3533.

it. “a. .”‘*¢ *‘U’

Tiblt I!

maﬁmﬂbﬁdhaou.

that. in:
391131 013.0

a narkcd dittcrunoo in tho

tanpoci‘ton or an; $hrt¢ tuntatutaoua (tab). :31).

it. povnluttdn nun prgdauinuutly*uppar sluts uiﬁh

At urn

pa! «tut O: pitiunin in dintucs

3

«lat:

1‘ an

IV. :36 non. 1a «1‘0; v.

rare in «1:539: 11!
uavu'iu alannou
ﬁ) 53;:

and

IV nnd

XV.

whzle

a:

9r 1!, only one paﬁitnt 1:

3%

68

par onnt of patttat:

$330 57 pcr aunt or

pltisntt

9‘

rhura nut. no ﬂixxartuot. 1n

.3. distribution

:3 sh» annt1$uiioual panulgtiaan. an. firth tug paﬁiunta

at»: this! tan use at tuuuty

and one

quart.» tor.

tort: runrn

or oldtr.
e)

;:;i

fan population: dittowad tn udlaatlaaul

�Cwmf Mﬂ
2%}
maxi?"

”an
m“
19$

54cm

59

may

£0

a?“

:-

2:

_:

'

19s
53

a:

2‘33
3

13
33

,

a:-

ﬁ

1:25;;

«

�.1}.
tﬁﬁalllmnt,
$1». ihnu

putttutn at a?! haviag nmri

v&amp;§h

that. iﬁ Illa.

as

Ilia 1.11.!

In

ca&amp;

$0 camplcia

a) pat «out at

0inlxutunt

while ht par aunt

rat! in:

a:

%&amp;0

a:

ﬁﬁuﬂiﬂ

pt£1tuta

blah iChOOI, tax: 33 par ctn‘

III as: at:

u¢oaa1

IUIF£

nﬁ

graauut¢. thin finding

:-

alga. dittorauua, :lnaa tho aoainl

clan: nitsuru in, in putt, husta

an education.

a) g;§§gggs nirruroueon in the dictrabutiou at hoards
«a

th‘ salitavngn r Seal: an». ohuurvud. Pittyvonc par a¢a$

at

mra

patitnts kid

with taunt: G! 59

i

«mart: htluw J0, uud aux:

at short

..

an. Eight:

r

tith‘

pur aaa$

aeorta buing ntmun

tinted with hiahav agaruuu a: uturuetypy. In ountraat.
$336 ﬂunnty par

91v oonﬁ

ﬁt.

h.¢

«iii

sworwa

putaan$u has

t

var: hclnu 30 an

at

50 or wars.

ta.

At an

9

it

Quilt, and tartrwtua

titty pt:

aunt at

1009:: in tho maﬁa}. rung» botuaan 30 nna

E9.

3.

Wag
It:

Vggbxq

candy inclnﬁad .xauiautinn

admin: ‘9 ﬁn.

a! th¢ rulutioua at 1!.

ylythidttiﬂ vﬁrinhlnn within

nauh

inatiauﬁioa,

�~13-

I3 v.11 an Butane: inatituﬁannu. Thwli noupnrilonn provud

dixricult hangar. or dirtortnain in tho attiuitioa
rtynhiatriq

1§v1nh1un.

tn.

*urxahlnu rung.d

01 th*

tidal:

@

and achw

parnhlc wutaoxt ovltarin eeulﬁ an: by a¢t§r333td. and varying

itarcta or ulsaingdntt. .rar'uaaupza, ta canparc tnoﬁltmﬁiani
in ralntian an xgugﬁh at hatp1%‘l stay, variant cutuott p¢rtodi
auto triqd but man. allowed
33%.

:5: aqutv¢1¢at «.11 11:...

At

an. gatrtaa of tha patituts ranatnad fawn: tug: 3".»

nau‘hs. and sleuthzrﬁu “‘3. than twozsa‘aonthu.

aeutt$nt,

70$

at .11

aha auly d! any. ﬁh;a

#13:. thus:

wax

pa$iuuﬁo runninad

1...

at

mass. 13

thin atvun Ioniht,

twilia annthu. In ﬁttuvuiutug social

informatxan nvailnhlu

far

292

a:

371

patioaﬁﬁ.

unalannitiahla at!!! at». ﬂﬁlt otian ﬂair! thu nduaatsuu at
tbs knahnnd at in. {athar at a haaaowtxn

«w

ntnor

wag nwt

rnaﬁrde¢¢

aonarainxzy, in the antiwaau cf ysywhzntrﬁc variable:
euphaaaa H111 ha plmoad on the ditfmroueun botv~¢u

inattﬁutanls.

�.15..

with citattun

at vii-want tutruutut‘ituttonnl ralntannthipa

(!Ih1c IV).'
a) ﬁgggggggg_gg~gzgg!§gggs tutu: lnltltntianu, tawﬁr

patatnsa

it

xx: r§a¢1v04 Inuitao ﬁharnpy

ﬁhnn

tun instituﬁsvuu (2:31. 1). canenrrantxy

3:: or launsngur plﬁilnta
instant,

8193

&amp;

anallnr parcau‘»

act. allllid at rcaaavias

paruhau

lurta aunts: (as pursuit) raooavtu; allitu

turn: at trautaoaﬁ.

I:

t

at $3. uthnr

tt

a 9:13.17 ﬁruntnon‘

an patiunts r¢ciivanx then: ‘htr:ptua

It!

claaaltioﬁ to raaciving psyuhau

thavupy utn¢u unuh 1- conventﬁauttr again:

taint. If on: ann‘rnat

ﬁhu

aanuﬁau thgrupy. urn about

t

rniidals pnyuhtn-

paranutlsa a: pt‘ltﬂtﬂ vttalvln;

atauattuuuttr loan ‘83: 01th.: at

tho 038:: in» institutinnu.

tibia
ﬂtthsu

V

uncut harn

ouuh xnu$1t1t&amp;on, ‘30

I‘i

ralntud ﬁa=a¢1aat1uu

�.15.

a: trautunn‘ ut urn
(I: Ihtln

1V,

mitt-I

and

r taut. at both urn «ad I! (tibln If),

and plynhnthurtptun aura semiautd, para

hittsac a awntrnut u! inattaa
Putatuta
KFﬁ

who W0?!

yuan;

it

thtftpitﬂ.)

ané puyuhclostnsl

urn hr who‘s

r nuara was

19:

it

or 33 ruoetvnd plychothnrxpy 91th sveltar rrnquanay than

pattonil

who

var. altar or ihﬁ hid task

achAQvunan£ and cua$u1

r ttﬁtti.

Eduagtiannl

alas: did not axgntxluanﬂly artist

culucticn at tromﬁuautlut nay huupit¢1.

luau; in: plyuhittriu vurlablau within ﬁlah inntitnttuu,
iigsnuuta ﬁgs

ﬁha

unit highly rnlattﬂ variabzo

$e

sultatioa

a: traaﬁnnkt. aquatic trot‘nnat wt: natcutud tar p‘tiuntn
clunoittod

t:

auhtuoyhrauiu ind nttqctavo diaardur mare

than the-y utttoud

I! purchonn§r¢tl¢. Bituhtrﬁa avuiugtton

n5 urn and aurgtioa

at hanyitgliuat$uu at an

rathid s.

at trtntuant.

ulna

titan

culmntion

At

and annc wow.

MPH,

p:t1natn

rceoivtac anun$¢c trnnwn¢nt (pradunlnnntxy that. «lann§é as

�“17.
hnucvur. than. nt :33 rcnuluua lencur ihnu ﬁt as
Iudnnd.

‘3. 1nt¢rtunc1tut1au§1 dalxnruaupt

n pataaaﬁ

ta ta. «lanai .2:

pitalistd tar chIVd
1a the

ytuncclt

.3.

at

to :rtaﬁ taut

an: airy 112.1:

cramp

aonthn or new.
group

worn

at

at

lHRGQ

$0 ha

ha».

£18 than wuru paﬁiuutl

Hana.

ﬂuwtmﬁnuudaﬁma «tr-bun an '-

Emﬁlc v thwut

hath

a) Diuggggzgz 3h. d$a%ributtou o: dtnchuraa titanium!

1:

shown $u

lﬁblu VII. Fur ututtutionl uuuiyail three diugv

rustic grasping:

warn undo:

nahtiuphvania, attactlvn attoraara,

aaa yirﬁhﬁh¢VFIi5§ and ysrioualtty ﬁtuordarn. 1k: diuunuutiu
pvupovitoaa nur‘

ttntlnr for in. El tat

popuxntiona, but

H330

sh: urn pa‘imatd warn rncnrﬁad at having f$WIr tttnattva and
unhatuphrunit diavrdaru and a luvs.» nuuh‘r

a: ptrahununrwtla

a: pgrnannlity datnrdors.

Intriinliitntiiuui
and 3

unuiyuts

nhnmnd

near. cur. allitad ta «13:30.10:

that

it

:t

an bath mat

urn us. glow: of

�.18..

it.

aaaaal tuuﬁuru «at ruiatad to atununoiug

non;

a: ‘h; I'd!!! VtrtlbIQi

have

ckintrta vaviabltu. diagnnuil
tutu hmnpital ‘0 atlcoﬁtoa
pitalahntawn; and duty

it.
is

um,

r:%ad

It

at

ham»,

it.
4;

picniltuuntty rtln‘uﬂ at

711

tr

huna

(via.

In ouch knupttul. rant pttttnts

”mm.

um

“ingrovnd' (ink). VIII).

(195) 9:

”an“

'tniupruvtd' lad calr a taunt. pltwtus

’rauovawad‘

at

ihtut barn

tau. at diuahurgi

mum-v

dwra‘lun

£0 «Inuhnruv ovtlunﬁaon

d) gigggg;§g_§ggggg3§ggs

¢1tluutnﬂ

u. rdlutcdt or ‘ha para

a: $rotiuan$ Ian

1% H8

1:51:

who

that: at lure

“math tupanvud'.

mu

van c.1125

the highest para-ntata a:

”rtcuvurad” at “unit isprovna' rating: (255) and

tht luwaut

(10;)
with sauna at muse.
prupawstcu a: "unimpruvwd‘
Antlynau vi‘han Utah anlﬁtﬁuttan

giant: varinhlb rulnlil.

�.19”
At 8! and Inna

that: III

C

sinncuay tgr

cldir putluaﬁt if b.

rutnd butt.» tan: ytuatar «uni. hut tut renal.»

illr lilnitiﬂiai

Quty-ut us. At awn

trend, with ulnar

pttituti

intrt

an!» lxkuly

tr.

atatxnttuu

vat tn upwtsitu

is h.

ruﬁud unimpravnd.

�~29»

m mum
In ibis unvpar‘ntn at ihro¢ vuluutary garuhittric

httpitala

Vt havu-abttrVad

sartoransua q:
cannttlun and

uninitiuaat tutarxnstituttounl

varaubloa
3.61:1
tho
in
at yuavs a:
pt‘itnti

tutti:

Illﬂi, but

00$

u¢.; ta diutriiustou a:

ﬁulttuvniu I‘Eaalu trawli; and in unﬁt of tun triniulnt wart»
$51.0

ditivtbxttnn a: aansuauuu sud dinohnrgu tvnlnaﬁtana. In

and

quxinal atlltlai

‘33

in

..

dnrnﬁatn a! havpitaltsutzan. tdiauistn or transnaaia

it:

§1r£oraacou
naapxtnl diner tbs «Enutha

alyahtairac vtrlannu rut. nuarthnd ta airinruuaul an

sunuclﬁiud
and
wins:
the
nacial

ttctarn at causatiun Ina utavio~

iapy n‘ raxlo¢tta in ya. v mourn. In
ﬁhn

trimhgapttux

atair,

tntnrtautatattausl-aﬁnyaritanu a: the pirahtttrta Vitib

«big:

I!!!

thaw

uiguitiannt sixtaruuogu, and §h§na rulluw

nupuatsa «attributiaa
thﬁ

its.

tars

a: ﬁt!&amp;l1_.1ﬂll, aduuntaaa

tinnisiodnﬁ Vast at

tat hryathutis 1a:

inaﬁitut&amp;nua1 caapuriaaat, wharc

it um:

and
1a

Oh!

r naorng

in.

iaﬂvuu

tutiaiputgd {ant iocttl

�.21”
wartu
in
puythtu§r10
bu
valntad
ulna
ulna: ditturtucau vault

cvuravlltng
uh:
1n
;ty1an.
dxusnaaitu
But
vuranttdna
whiuu.
in3$1ﬁut£¢ua1 varlnttnnt

1n

cud
hamytiuiiuatxtu
duratinu at

Affautad
anﬂ
«unvaritau:
thaiu
vatautad
diuchsvgu rattan:

tho signatscun¢¢

0%

tbs inturhinuittutianil.aunpnrisauu 3!

ﬁn

iﬁliiﬁﬂiiiﬂl'ﬂ¢*
aaltcttun
at
tracing:
It?

idlﬂﬂiid taint

ﬁhru: institution: a: bqing aduparuhid in

“‘11;

Int,

acaaamta,

rotuntitie

nué th¢rap¢utia

aﬁ$aa£pattus
rigor.

printiynt ditttruntui

ninth
nampaaisAou
await}
in the

thair putaaaﬁa. run:

were

atrtaruni in whatnl alts! puttivni

prﬁhiana
aathaﬂuiuczcal
thu
bu‘ nest Itriktus sure
Vida dinsrdp;ua10u

a:

mm

in:

in tha atrialﬁtuus a! tha plvuhtttrla

wiriuhloa.
can aaa¢1usian qoalé be

that t§c dh‘nrvnd difzurauacc

in purahiatric Viridhlut uqrﬁ

littln act.

1dianyasr:a1n¢. wt: «untrant ta

in
hnapihglxsod
urn
ptttuatt

ta;

than aéninxntr‘iﬁon

laughs ¢t tam: taut

33% 3nd name

in an arm‘s,

�n22»

havuvir th¢$.1$ in $53 1£k01?‘§h be a raiiccﬁiou a: mixturiuaui

ta 5h: ﬂip:
in

it

«nah aduluiu§rut1va

:avquﬁtiuu

tanturcu an noupluniﬁy u: diachiutta

hnﬁ dtuahurnu

avalaataon, tinny a: tharipiti

lVI11£31l uni thy énfiaitlou
and sauna

“kink

::

fin atttarnncut

quuttﬁy or uaatnl niiarahr.

airiiuiaa

at

garchothurany are arcat

dsxturunaoc £«11nu n gntturn.

canttstant vath.9ruvioun randinxn

A

-.

yatturu

and hypuuhunal on

tan rataﬁann.at toaiai :actaxi $9 pxyuhst‘rzu «a»; at hampxiﬁln

tlid ﬁttinntt. It is palsahtu taan, that tau
oabﬁky

a!

ﬁn

inatitution in

aawivnd

ta

t

trauﬁnnnt

putt.

stuntsiatnt uxtint

sociajmyahalmaintl
tautuvna ﬁt in» pliiunﬁ
Ivan thn prcdoutnant
popnlntxan partly in rolatinn in the proatpticun, uttiﬁudcu.

identificatian
rulatian to
darivud

and asparntsaas

{ha nxpcatationa

thcir nuainl

a: tha ntnrf

and

pnrtly

0: tbs patient: and that!

1n

fililiti

buekground.

rhino nothﬁdalagical dittieultiou «nu the ntgnxtiaant

arrant or gdmsniptrnﬁivc and stat: uttttndua

on

pnyuhtatrto

�.93”

vuraiblcn «r. vuluvnni

it

She cauvunﬁtaaal was

itVt utntavtacg. ugpa¢iu117
thuvapius. The rrtqnaut

in:

1a

may

a:

avu1§;ﬁ$nn

or aaup¢rn~

at ynynhtstrda

4£I¢hargQ vuiinga, diuwaantic

algaanu or I-agth a! heaptttlixntioa us

arisiria o: $h¢rtpvutlc

valuua ar computability or aubzacts and pﬁﬁﬂlltiaui
3.3%

ta .xailutvo arrnr unlit:

ugtahoé
sawing

It:

ﬁn:

at.

inatitttaena are olanrly

aauini¢trattvc philoncphy uni l9¢1l1 «1:0:

a! papulntiua

nut variablgt

..

ta nﬁutznn 9:1:

at that study.

ruiluvt in naeiuat to:

thilt

litnral tatirprctution of

Thu

saﬁw

ﬁne

in.

paraéexiaal

mast 91.13:.

altar. at :

variablus is in bu

Cut abanrvatioa

nonpu«

noun

1: a

at that atuiy. 1h.

tub
hawk highly trutand reactant! «and!¢t1as tyeaiuaut
ﬁ?!‘htn
an
or
iiunx
puriod:
(unlinitcd)
shiah is appliud tar aptiutl

pepulntians with in: luau: prapcrtint alaguusnﬁ in In untuv¢r*
uh1¢ pragnautic gravy (cdhisephruuiu)

item

a: ttvaruhls trvnﬁuaut fﬂltl‘.

.-

and

sat, «a. proparv

it iho pomrtct. it Hand,

in cantraci, «hat: tug 1¢nst trusuta tharnpiutt 13:1: trnntuauﬁo

�u’hu

to:

tho

attrt¢r periods, to

a yapulutita with a higher pam-

pnrtann daugucuta nchxsopkvautn (v‘po¢r yrngnosua 1) tau
pvuportiou or ttvurt§10 Jiaahlxca rttiaga 1a

artuturl ahibualr. thtta obturvutltan

an

act

uizutfitaatlr

rail-It

thy

itarapuuttc hfftcacr a: th¢au tantatntainu. but indiuutun

tn.

dartbwuat
1&amp;1:

critarta a: inprwvcnaat.

Inc! or «barity in diagnostic unhona‘a sud incompar~

ability at paychtntrto trantnuat variation Ital: pants to
:tttlwtud calpurattvu

«$3613: or paywhigtric thavapiun.

Iii

I!»

txanpla, thu vacant failure: by wiricua kaolactcnl natuut1¢ta
to confirm ubuartatiana 3:66 in ether laburntlvan: hay'bu
an much a

raxluotian a! diffuranaiaa in populations, pavuﬁtu

atria «attoriu, 233.
rha'waéaayraad asa

at

an £311u¢1oa 1n the
numb

original hypnthaucu.

turn: ‘3 “Inhinophrantuﬁ an

'9»:ahou¢na¢sau* to unplaro eh. uhancot 1n payuhologsenl

a:

bialagiatl roaturca with anntnl illnouu h;n 1.4 ta a scaled.
burdcnad by acautivc

result: (3.11:3). hast u;rkaa rauuutly

�.3...
an

in. tantztnting railing at

tn.

rnacc a: «taunts

cud paywhulngatul

a unrun ruvtav an cﬁhiiaphrnatn:

fit in. whiz:

thnripitu or

ﬁne

transnatarinn

if

aauaatu

inuuqruvakxltty.ot Git

phywznzaganaz *~ huhnriuraz corvulattnun an aunt an

(Fuuktnat§zn) and tadattan thruahala ﬁaaks¢

Erna

it. uuaholrl

«art

:

vaxtd

ﬁbulrvusiua in hi rtvurtad traa tug alxntt, do w: hhva nuthtd!
avn$lub1n $9 «uteri»; yepalntﬁaus.aduquataiy

sauna num£Xraation? .Wu.ha11¢vu not,

mad

ta gravid:

a

nunnludo tron ﬁhnﬁi

«bairvatiuuu that incruuugd attuatiua aunt bu ynxd ta tha
suathodnluwiani yrnblnud

mm“, mm

a:

alunuzﬁyias nubauaia by “ubgnaﬁavu‘

ma. um mum: mama

no hﬁahly ﬁuyaudunt on

inatiﬁntianal and

and tau zun£ap¢y¢hu1nainal tapuwtx

which

«was: to to

«bauwwir att1$aﬁula

at in. ﬁhurtpiahmyntimuﬁ

intirauatmng
what aw tha ralmilan

at again: ﬂlﬁiﬁ

t¢»psyeh1x%r1a

trantnunﬁ an t§aﬂa pdyulutiamx? aﬁgnzfitant dittiraaaaa

it

trcutwant anttavn taint betwoun thaau anntatu$aans, nné thqr

‘

�~26»

ds-auﬂdr ﬁg dilrgmnuﬂ moat: Inuiul attuvam,

utthﬁdalauiaal limitliauan umtlinaﬂ
wan-no gruuﬁar a dcﬁawninuni

hit with!»

ﬁhc

ilviitv, iaﬁinl atuti

pirkhtnﬁvia
Sh!
Vittthiun

if

«athin any inititutznu than «or: aha «ﬂan» varidblam‘ ﬁn

«nuns «may.
hauuvur,

that

m:

away” 1»

ﬂay ianaiduraiaun

«him

«a.

m we

a: vctturna or

at in.

may,

&amp;&amp;:¢nosin and

ﬂitting.

tharimx unnuaﬁ

laniri

I! it

that-in that! haupxtalu, patiunt twain! tiara

graﬁmhau

thn phitnaqphy

twcuﬁnua%

as an intruahaapisal thutar. 11 Ian: tutanttatr malttnd tn

diigniﬂxl «nu try: bf ﬁruiinuuﬁ than int naturt a:
vﬁduti hﬁnpiial uni uh» iﬂﬂill canny
aaaraaanu

tum iaaim

it wh£th it‘prtalriir

:t-azr.

an: paraaunbl a: mazxnaaa lbuyiiil, tantra», likb thmt

a: in: sunningar‘ﬁhnaraal

awn: mm“

mm

unsp1$a1 wad ﬁn. laxtauhuutttu

m: WIN:
a

In institution: with 31f£¢v¢ni

ﬁxmmm

trt‘tntut iriunﬁatiﬁnu.

pntaibta taut eitrarint witntiuhu

hutw&amp;ua

it in

theta vurtibtni

�wa?ﬁ

any ”a

‘h“r“‘i

In hntpitnli. gar ixuaplé.

whﬁwl

trnutnant

n‘=‘¢£&amp;Iru¢ urn pvﬁnarilr auutnatuz or «um-tic, or «hurt

nut: nuns” mun anagum m
inﬂiviauui tacit} alas»

it in: in:$itt$&amp;uu

may

auﬁ xxx

cm

Win-mat

awn,

diiiﬁngﬁiah‘ﬁrtihﬁtni grwapte x$

azatt uua aﬁministwuiivt attitgdat

urn a ﬁriﬁiﬁl Vﬂrzabla in auﬁarnintae tan pa‘iani‘n dinnnnitl;

irauﬁnuut, qua tiawtk at haupiaaligaﬁica.

�culpartnoa a: Suctopuyuhaloglcgl Virtublos nan
Psychiatric frnniuunt 1n rite. 'blult‘ry laopltalu
A

ru.».‘; In:

Rdbart L. xnhn.

ramnnsk,

rn.n.

la‘hautcl 311.01. 95.9.
and

In:

Iris

113k,

8.3.

tho nontriuont or lxportncltnl Paychtntry,

ltllaido

loupatnl, Glen Oaks, 3.1., 1.2.
£1404 in part, by grant nxuaoyz u: tho lhtlounl Innt1$u60
or lontal ﬁatl‘h, 8.8. P3511. Health survlco; and the luau.»
county ﬂoutnl Ioal‘h Basra.
tho oooporaﬁtoa at tho stutto «t tho Intiuchuaotta ﬂau$a1
lonlth Gout-r and tho c.r. loaning-r nunartul loapi‘nl 1o

stat-fully

:

acknoulodcod.

Division
or
Hvutcfloro
Psychiatry,
ﬁnnpttnt.
;;U:;ut'tgdruaas
!
’ I
C

v11:

Q

3/62

�I: that:

at in.

law lav¢u psychiatriu put10n%
populutauu, lollinxphcaa and iodlxch r-porﬁud Iicn1ttonut

utuﬁy

rotatloanhlpc hair‘s: nu individua1’u pantttou in tho tacit!
01:3: struottro :34 tn. provalanoc It treat-d 111-03., £ypcn

at diagnouod dalorduru and usual 03¢ duratxan a: puyahttﬁvtu
trcntucut ndntatu‘orod ( ). tiny indicatod that proportionntoly nor. 10rd: 0130. pasxnutu in stout-cut vow. clalilfitd
an psych-‘10 whtiu ‘ppar clas- pattcu‘a vow. Iﬂfllttil ulna-1ttod an noarotto nud parannnltir disordcra. n-unrdloll at
digglouiu, plyuhciharupy was Inplcv.d 1a diaproyorttoaa$cly
high 4.:rooa with tho uppor at... pntloutu. and annual.
thtrnpto: with lcvcr clans subjects.
1h. Stilt-no. or cacnunio Iﬁnt‘u :34 the availability
§0I1d
or ﬁroa‘iug POIIOIIII
not in cauludcd 1n £hou¢ t‘Idlﬁl.
to tout the 901. or noctll_tnctoru 1: tin trcsiacut :1 ho:pitalxnod puﬁaon‘a indopusdoat a: plutont's tinnncuu and
:vuilubxllty at tro:tnon$u. n yntlca‘ turvoy val undtrtakuu
1951.,x: u:at nan-u.
a «rut:
:of treatment nod... including ildavsdual paychothnrapy ans
orgnuau ‘hnrnpiou ‘90 nvnilnbln ta :11 ptt1ant: rccnrdlcsn

mun:

ct ‘htir ablli‘r

maul,

t. guy.

In ﬁhnﬁ tauplo. 33s. tduuutton and plant or birth var.
otgnsrinnntlr luuoutntod with chain. ot.‘rautnont, durataoa

at hilplﬁtllll‘illg allutnal discharge ivuluatiou

‘30

�lllﬁntlii

(

).

it. gltatcul factor: war. 11-. ralltod

to

a non-Ira a: utorootrpy. tho calttorntu 1 Seal. ( ). ltxhcr
r acoran tor. turn ur‘on round in pilliatl dauguoaoi a: tuvolntaouul parlhnlzl rctqrrod for sciatic thirty: and hours.

taliiod to: a shortcr yuriod ( ).
It It. concluded that ti. extant. a: postal altar, uno.
ldi'ttiol. htrthplaaa and dagrco a: atarnotrpy on psyohtu‘ric
ﬁrtatnca‘ pnt‘uvnu VII. uoﬁ a roault at cannanta tno‘orn at
availgbtlttr of troutlunt .10... On. tugxon‘iun was that
3001.1 :hcﬁ'rl tuIquu-od diagnouin :ad tronsncat by atrociing the varbsl and avg-vnrsnl nynptc- pattarnl at pats-It
behavior. It was puntnla‘cd tha‘ nubauo£l at lcvor lusts!
all-sou. Inna-r oduot‘tua :34 £03.13. Birth vault nartroqnontly'unuttcnt lynptuun

non-Vtrbal. IOBIOPI or IOtO!
pnttnruq cud
«avast phyolonl noﬁsa or thurapy. Huger
ulna. subject. will! utiltic Vtrhal non-n at gunman-10:,
and patintputn paycholngioal turn: at troninun‘.
A non-ad xn‘crprctataon rilnﬁod plynh11$r1¢
trnutnont
‘0 tho philosophinn and uttxﬁnduu or individutl payuhtatrints
and hatptttl ntat! nttttudou. II 1&amp;3‘1‘n‘10ll what. patch.»
thartpy Ill hluhlr vulucd. typo: 011-0 pnttunin vculd b.
‘rontod dispruyorttountcly with ptyuhath'rnpr. ataxllrly.
dischargc ovuluattonn tad durut1on a: honpttalltntaon U'lld
1n

it'll

be uttcctcd by

itttaroncol :u o‘ttt unpootutioau tor individlu
all or distortu; noctal «13.3.

�.3.
In

to“ m. «and menu“ I. «cum: u up.“ $0

lillaldo (ll) :tudy

unploytns tin can. proctdurcl :ud
tons-trout}: to attend thu diacrquIGnl to in. 0th.: taut:tu‘tonl. ‘hu 0.1. leanings! nuuurtnl inapltll at tarot.
(If!) and tho llaunoinncttc lautal lcnlth cantor a: loaton
tultt‘uﬁtann worn loloaﬁod in tho Impoo‘nttan
(ulna).
‘In$ tiny servo putt-at: .8 ditrursux 30.1.1 clunuou and
1951

It...

thnt ditfcrOIcoc an ‘hta dinanatuu uculd ho rofinotod in
tho trnatucnt vurtdblou. In that. houulnlu $huro 10 a minim
lnrlty 1n attitudo £OUIrdI ‘rcntnaut aad oduna‘tou. Inch
1: a ‘oaoltug haapt‘ox with n {:11 $hlo Inpcrvtaorr utntt
and out£v0 research dapar€n0a$. tiny 0:93.013. plythae
t-nlrttcalxy-orlontod payohttharupr but gravid. 0‘30: trcnt~
lint. inslnlan; taunts. thcrcptou and activ. prosrnss or
I111ﬁl £harnpy. Each :troinlt Ihlrtutarl troutnont or
valuntnrr puttautl, does an‘ gravid. cuuﬁodial car. and
toads t. d!!! 1‘: pu‘aont pcpnla‘tou trim 01:11:: as. groups.
It. Ipouttio till a! £hxl study var. ﬁt duttrntna popu13‘103 airfares-Ia toﬁvccu th- thrlc lun‘tﬁltioan with roupcct
to social 01..., a... cantatlol und 1 learn, and to roln$a
‘hunc patient attractorta‘tcn to tho trouﬁuca‘ variables c:
twp. o: ‘rauinout. durut1on or hanpitaltua‘ton, ligament:
Ind iililltta uvnlnniitu.

�.5.

am
vuluntnry. adul‘ putiuntn 1n rustic... In ‘htll
tuntttuttanl on a 31v.- dn‘c ta Ignutrr 1959 new. studiod.
“£11. Ill and as had vnllntary 9a‘1cn‘l only. 3 0:311 nuniar
a: ‘Inuc It also not. nultlnad by tho court: tor paychtntrtc
ovulittton. or war. numb-r. a: a chronic achtsnphroatc utt‘o
holpttul group transforrud for u upocltlo ranoarnh p30500‘.
than. pataousn aura «natal-d tram tin Itudy b¢¢uulo of tuna:
Ian-vnlunﬁcry status. !Ia I‘I‘V population nountntnd a: 113
patinata at II, 100 a‘ Its sad 9S ut ulna. tutu pattcu‘ III
¢1vcn sh. calitorntn r 00.1: ( ) on tin doatgnntod data.
Bastian: mouth: taint the paﬁtcntl’ rccurda war. anulynod
(hr Oh: variant social and payshinﬁrl: taster. If sh. titty.
1hr tho daﬁuruinatton a! social claua. t5. lulltngshaad
autuc‘ar luau: was hand ( ). rho utudr thalidod ulnnxan‘aon
a: the rolntacua or ﬁhn 0001.1 to it; payahtaﬁrtc vurtublot
within tack tau.atu‘lon. .3 3.11 a: tutu-on tnuti‘attonl.
otnpurtnonl pravnd dttttcnlt basin-o at littoral... 1:
the dutinttton at the paychtnﬁric vurinbloa. ‘Io variabloa
ranged #11017 lad cnnparnhlo cutout: orttarta 00:16 30‘ to
d0$urnanua, and varying dour-on at 31:31:. 41“. lb: uuunplo,
to acnpnru tnctatuttonl in rola‘son to length of haupltnl
u.ny. Vlrlitl ouﬁoott potion. wore ‘raod but I... IIIIIOG
for gilpurnbln dtnttlbuianun. At III, on. Q‘nrtnr or the
pattuata tonuilcd raw-r this cart: nouths. tad wwvo‘hlrdo
L11

it...

�.5“
than twtivu nan‘hn. A: Illa. :3 contract. 701 at :11
61
only
Inca
‘htu
rauntnad
nor.
00"! nath:. I.‘
pitiilil
that ﬁnalv. mantra. I: inturututug coats: 01:1. ‘haro vac

IGIO

08
89!
for
uVIilabll
lltlrlaﬁtul

union accurrad what. thy 06‘3ct10n

wit.

.r in. tn‘hnr at I ulnar

Pittoatl. Incluluttinhlo‘
of tho hm:hand of a not...

371

not ruccrdod.
Anacrdtus, 1n ﬁho auolyann or payuhaasrto variation
ouphunia will be glucod on tho asst-runaun botvacu sastzﬁutlouu.
with ostnttuu a! rutnvnnt antrn-tnttstnttaunl roln‘ioashtpa.
was

�~6-

3mm:

I.

tn no
Whoa riparian; Itndtal 3:1: I hano’inlsatuttou, £30
ltruttlro if it. hanpt‘nl 1| takcu for nrnntod, and ui‘h-r
ilﬂﬁf04 I? 8.ﬁ*1‘ild brinrly. luvtvur. 1n atnaytuc a
cuupnrabia
Gut:
13¢
gather
nttaupttag
Itransn tlntitutian
t.
1::51tn-V
butt-an
tho
differ-nae:
many
1at
tﬂhrd
3.4:
II.
$103.. It. hosp1§a1 organisatsun a: a datnruianat a: grantnout in on: nothndolocie prohlcu. Far oxnnplo. bu‘h £h.
mane and III havu dny houpttal unttc, while an doc. 39‘.
A. name the ﬁeottias phwuxciun can our. tar a patioat an In
Qho
and
an
sitar-taro
any
tbs
in
hacpt‘ul.
tacpattuut,
clinic. II Inch a ustttnn, ha 0‘! Ital tree t0 «tachnrgo
the pntlont tron tho Ioupital at tn curlxsr «sit. kl¢V1lﬂ
that he v11: still bu ranycnsitil £09 hi: pntxont's c;rn;
what-an at In, dischargd lint! tnwuinnﬁiou «I shut putiost-

1.

I

rclttionlhtp.
tu-thar probluu an: cu. princnea «I dittoront ruuourch
the
.2
‘15.
routines.
¢1$i10a1
ti.
attoctin:
it
progra-u.
the
91810.1. at
a:
porcont
tunity
upprcutnatnly
IIIVQI.
sane acre chroszaally 111 and had but: haupl‘nlttoa for
hnvo
ban:
in
unrn:XIr
u
such
act
that!
zrc‘p
nan: y-arl.
thin honpttnl hit tiny and icon trtatturrﬁd Iran anathur
donﬁer

Ittt-

Anntttl§£un for

That,

it.

t lytiill silty.

vary tactqrn to war. tut-routed in Itn£rin¢

�.7“

situated ‘ho coll-ataoa and arguaisa‘:¢a .: tit dttn.
ap.o::1- grails-l var. noted :- do.1¢ua.1¢an 0: try: a:
trout-tut, (sag-nattc torn. and actlnntlouwor troutucnt

outta...

.)

naggiggtigg at 3:23 2; rrggﬁucntc 2h. crttorit tor
looignntlng that I past-It r¢ouivud 'parohothornyy' dirtorod
anon; tun tastttntioul, waking unitarnltr in olntlttscatsuu

difficult.
At

Iii p:yohothcrnpy

tru;;nant
34.1.II
‘ stat: paychintrtat,

was dal13n1§od

tttoroa on a pronurtpttoa banxl by
lb: uhxch tin patiunt was citrate a ton.

sonbaaan with

the payohia‘rio rnnidoa‘ v.20 countdnrod part a! rcutxao
nintnlutrattvv yaﬁinnt Giro.
At In plythothcrtpy Ill dcttnod at trtntnqnt caution.
vith ‘ho plyohto‘rtu raaiduat. Stat! payohattrtn‘o dtc not
trgut pl‘ltuﬁl. but rootrlcsad that: cctavt:aos to cupcrva-tag
tho téﬂlﬂOi‘ phylacxaao.
At tho lune pnythc‘hornpy val dalxcnasud an a (tactic;
of Ian: diocipltaca ~~ pnyshtu‘rio rusadoatu, psychololiatu.
Iactal Iurkorn, strata and nodical students. III-n1 accords
at such stations vow. n9$ routtnoxy taclndoa 1n the pntlonﬁ'u
rouurd and to :lcurtain thigh pu‘iontu roociv¢d piytho§lurapy,
tn. rouidnn‘ tn charge at oath a... van lu‘trviovtd.
h) Diagnaaaus ludividUll 1::‘1tn‘10na1 dtugnoittc
atria. ﬁll. and. ocupcrisnnn litticult. At K!B din-barn.

�diagnouol nuptqycd tut nultipin cvnlnn‘ivn dn‘n sch-no
raculncadod hr thy tntrtouu Paychlu‘rtl 1.00:11‘1uu whilc
both in .36 male rolllvod unt‘ury ayutana. anvural 11:191..

at

IJI arc

iihlo I, vl‘h our in:sootcd convurliona tutu catuturica eunyurthlo to tho 0th.:
11.130000 tru—

ltuﬁod in

fags; convvrizoas provtdc, havcvar, tn
unavnidabla taste: .3 diutartioa. (31:11:: aboarvntluau havb-nn roperﬁnd by Pas-Inuit: and him tauoetstad ( ) wha
indicat. that dilzuntaa Within tho tine tantitutloa Ira db.
vulnnrnhlo to individunl titraruacua Ilia: examaacraa
ﬁve lunﬁiﬁuﬁlouu.

u--O-“.““.
{thin I
”’W‘.ﬂ u...
c) gtlobnrlg Ragggln a: Ingggvcmcut: Rating: 0: invrQVOo
aunt wart-é 1n (splat and dotall. It. discharge rating at
nil was $r1purt$£o with a inparu§a cvaIunilun tor soatal.
ottrac‘urololttal and Irndrona canteen. RI and tune End
clubs: ratings in which 1‘ VII difficult ta attain the can.
‘rtbuﬁton at such tuct¢~ n: tn: 1!! Iyltuu (rnhic 11). Fur
than ntuiy gt. 3!! lyndrawc rating van unwanted to it: global
rgttuc' a: an and line.
C-” t .“G‘”.
Q

Tibia

XI

”“ﬂ“Q‘O”
a. Booicgtzphologgggl Virgabloc

�‘9.
Scotti amp-u; that. at: a ngrkad dixttrcuuu ta ta.
.0013} alas! count-$Qton at ‘bn tire. annta$nttonl (tibia 111).
g}

at.

.t

as
praduninnutly “pvt? 0130!;
nxddlc .1333; and at mane, produatnauttr loan! 01‘33.
h) ﬁgs: Thar. war. no daltcroiaul in 01' itl‘cihltina
in tho tus£1sntiounl popula‘aonﬁ.
o) pdn¢uﬁgggc The nopuln%toas dittarod in oduaataounl
attstauant, with pniitu£l at If! havtuu not. glut: a: sinustiou than than: at 3:36. ﬁhlin k1 per aunt of ‘hl pusiunﬁl
3‘ Hana tutled to aauplotn high cahool. only 32 par canﬁ at
an tud 23 par cant aﬁ urn did not grndutta.
d) r Sacra: natturuuaaa 3. tin ata‘rlbnslcn a: metro.
an tau calitnruiu ! 3131. war. oblorvcd. Itrth-oao pot ennﬁ
at urn pattaaﬁa had I soar-n hcldv 30, and eat: ctgh‘ not «out
wi‘h start. 0! 50 or thaw. ~~ tn. highnr ? neuron 3.1:; .8..egatnd with higher 6.3!... at sgurcoiypy. In coa‘raut, at
unnc tumuﬁy par ccnﬁ var. halo! 30 at tho 2 30.10, .Id fortytuo par cant hnd intro. 9: 50 or more. At an titty par coat
0! it. patiuatu hnd r an.rua in £hu utddln rgagc botutoa 30
and £9.
3. szph§ggg$g Vutiuhlgt
In‘rnainutttuttunnl oonparinoau urn counotidatod 1:
tabla 1', while tutaroinlt1£u§10nal unitartitul It. prancu‘od
indiviﬁnullr 1n llih not$tcn. In ttbl. IV, ntlbu and payohou
thcrnptoo var. cnnbtnad, parntﬁtana I oontract a: 30-311: uni
At 81! the population

�pcycholcglaal tharaplnu.
3) 8.1.0.1.: or troatunu‘: ‘80:; inn$1tu.1ona, lunar
6%
fOOOSVDd
ulna,
$hat
naught.
or
thornny
I!
I?!
at
yl‘iontu
(iuhlo V). OOIOIBIOC‘IV suallcr various... at tho urn
pu‘tontl taro 31:35.6 :3 rootivis¢ paynhoﬁhorapy, with u
largo tank.» (36 putt-at) ratotvxna 31110: torso at ‘roa‘o
tout. 1t an patsonta rocotvtn. nilxou thnrnptou at. Clﬂliltic¢ an raoniviu: plyluothoragy no i yrs-3:1 Iroatnuut ItIQO
sank pattnntil cantonxtanily 3.01:; 3 3.014033 ply-htnsrict.
003331.
or
rnuctvtnx
tho
plﬁtuu‘a
pcrnonﬁtnc
ion‘ruct
on:
I:
thornpy, urn ﬂhl'. nighttlctntly loo- thlu intact 02 .3.
o‘htr tun anlﬂ1£itaona.

.

”U“.

d.-.”ﬁ-‘.”.’..~”

£311. 1 abuu‘ barn
ao¢1a1«paynholoui¢a1
P
Old
acorn
nun
Alon;
fuotlro,
nannisieantly rolatad tn sraawnout nsloc‘ioa (0160» and highsr

r Basra

patzom‘a

at ups;

and 9

ant. froqucntlr'vccosvtna somatic therapy)
8.0:. can tainted to troaincnt ooloo‘ton n‘ 33.

athar taa‘ora utrc Itgnaticauﬁ. Ian. of ti. '001n1psychological factor: II. rclntta ta try. at trottaon‘ at
nuns (tabla IV).
Luau. ﬁn. purchx‘tric vurtabios vi‘hin ouch inntttutiou.
diagnosit at: ntgnitso:ntzy‘rolntod 1a '11 tutu. hospital-x
discharge ovaluntton ‘t I?! only. had dura$1an or hocyt‘nltunttoa

I.

�.11.:

it

an and nano. sonata. troaanan‘ nun aolaotol for pattunta

clnnuittud

nu ochisnphr-nta

titan that

$hoa¢ cluaaod

tad attactivu diacrdar “or.

a; paychgnnlzotio at oath htartt;1.

urn. pataanﬁ: roootvinu acnatxn truaﬁuont (prudnnilaatly
that. tlaa¢ad as Ichanophrontn) raeulvcd ditahnrso rattncu
at Iniupruvud nor: artua than pntianta rnnttvini payohoth-rspy
At

nlonn.
b) BI!&amp;I&amp;I! a: BIG 1it11 'zttat 1k. fir-c 11¢t1$ut1¢ul
dittorod with roaptot to pnticu“: ltauth at utly (2‘51. 71).

”an“

was mat-nu: 19‘s.", um 65$ at gaunt.
taunt-1n. tar traits «oath. .r usrc, compare: ta 31 par cnn£ at
‘ta 1! puttonta and only 5 par aunt 0! than. at nuns“ 2h.

an

andul aﬁﬁy st ‘30 In group it: bctvnoa save: and nl¢vnn
noatha I311. tau-thirac at the anus pattun‘n var. diach§r¢od
within '1! uoathl a: houpttnlinnﬁtou. 8.01.1 oinnu and
3 $3020 we». utt rnlutod id aurution at nay tultltutiou.

ti. psy¢h1n£rio vurinblua. III! 613330.13 coula ht rtlntod .
ﬁg ﬁhnao diuanantd ll achtsorhrouia utro bnlpttalaucd tar
inncor puriaﬂi .t each instii‘tscn. at «vary .3. 1.7.1, it...
a:

at urn ran-incd loagar

tuna Qt 38 av Hana. Iadctd. tun lituriantieutiontl dirrcronuon turn a. gruat that a yattcnt in

m clan-tn an» m m. lit-11 u be mutant“ “r
tulovt manta: or

more

ut urn thug war. putaautn in

ﬁne

"II‘II‘ ts. Irv!) at x386.
Within initiﬁatﬁnns.

as.

andauducu‘1oa

at

xxx tad an

�a“.
war: wizntad ‘0 lsucht a: honpitnliﬁatzuu -« runagir tad 1.0:
olucutnd pstanntn rinninits for tho linxca‘ porioi

tail. 1!

dsdnt

atrt

a) Qgggggggg_gzg;33§;gga In ough hacpitnl. Kilt patient.
.32
um
um mum“ u. ”wwma" (ran.
are cnlutoé u.
(19%)
1;
a"
var.
peanut
panamWW.
Ultli nu ”uninprovaa" and 0&amp;1: ‘ 31331: patient Hus antlua
'rcgovnrod” or .Iﬁﬁh taprovid‘. tum highcat pareaataec at
'rotovur-d“ a» ”tank inprovud' 31:13:: (20:) :51 an. tenant
propurtion a: ”Ininyruvvd’ {101) «0:. Stand at aunc.
Lnalyuua within such auntttnaioa uhcutn vurtnbln rouulto.
A‘ an and nunc thsrc an: n tandungy IQ! )Iaar putauntn to ho
Iltcd hctﬁor ‘3‘: yolaanr anal, but ‘kc ratnita tr: l‘a.1|$1t~
was
m.
ma
on
than
n.
may
aimltisaant
awn”.
um
rm‘cd
to
5!
with
Iatupruvlla
oléar
likely
an».
pstinntu
trend,
tut ‘hia did not aahsava a‘sttltlcni tignittaanno.

n m,

an.

mm

a

“‘3'“ :9.“‘ﬂl”..”rhbgo VII
wa-oonhwﬁcumahha

d) btgsnnuila

Fur

u‘atiattnul analytic

$hrnn dinsnontal

l¢h38iphliu1¢, arxostavc dsnurdaro.
and poyzh¢ncnron15 and tﬂrlﬂnllltr ditirdlrt ($351. '11:).
nuns
and
31-11::
ﬁt:
I!
disgn¢at1¢
proyorticnn
It!
It!»
It.

groupcinsu Ina. 544::

�.13.
pcptlnttonn. but it. Ill ’iﬁiﬁlﬁﬂ «or. rcunrdod an invanu
and
and
a 13:30:
Iahtuophrcntc
nttacttvo
1130:4023
tart:
nn-pur a: purchanouroﬁtc or per-duality dilornora.
Intrailltitutlnutl ntalrlta Ibiuid that tt I! tot! l1.
tad r loot. wore rolstad to It‘sntuan; 1‘ III an. at... a:
£h. nacitl tltttrr was rolntca to dsnxnootng null. as 1386
iii? I! it. 30:13! vuradbla¢ war. no ralatod. at tho p31»
Ohllttll var1thlos, it‘snoata val nignitiaantly rtlstnl gt
enth hoiyital te tg1:¢tica 01 trnuitcnt llﬁ durati¢n of
sad
only at IE to diauh‘wxo artlaatiau.
hanpt‘nltuation;
.ﬂuﬂwﬁ Q. .DI.C“M”O“
flhla V111 dbaut hart

U-“OD‘““Om--.ﬁ-“”“~.-

�.15.
n

.

10!

In this courtrtaon It ﬁhroa vutun$nrr paychintriu
houpa‘alt a. hat. dbuorvud tisaatlonat tn‘orinutitntionnl
atttuvuunol I! rattantl 1. ‘ho noctnl vurtlblta a: rtura
at oduca‘ioa and 1.01:1 slant, but not ugu; :- distribution
at cnlstorutu r acalovan¢rnsy ‘nd 1: oath of tin truntnmat
durntaon a: knapst:11uatton. ccluctton o:
vurtlbluu

trdut-c-tl

and

atltrtbutton at 1113.0...

and danuhnrct

ovuluattlua. It. tilt-routs: in ‘rontncnt variable. butt-nu
£ho Lia‘stuttuns nay roc‘l‘ Iron man: flitlrl. including
£ho 30.1.1 aspoo$o highlightod 13 an! tntﬁstl ain‘t-t. 2'
dttinc tho r01: a: sedan! tho‘oro taro olonvly, vb IIICIiotk tho 1n£r‘~$nlttttt1¢nu1 nulparinOIt. Iron into. aﬁulyioa.
ﬁt» :gok a: cnlutltcnt ralaGloashtpu land: dent: n: in tho
v.1. at putlcut nottal tuaiars u‘ priallpil actorntnnnta 1a
£routnal£ vtlhln than. tittin... It via an‘tcipatud that
wi‘hin ouch tusﬁltnttoa. pnﬁlonin at hichur 00.1.1 clays,
turn: r not». ans hat‘ar causation, would to croutud prcrcru
tg‘luXXV by pcrthntb¢V£vrg clnsnttiod as nourotio, tuna:tnr shorter partodl and r:¢¢1v. botﬁ-r danchargo rats-an.
wl‘hxn in. :uli1iut10n, an irrtstlnr unsootnﬁloa bc‘vtta tn.

1;).
(ram.
mun-u «I
wan. no sauna-n.
it. Illa. not. at tin Inuit: $323.51.. var. rotatod tn any

cum

at: at. tacit! alga: Itliilttc;117 rotataa to 3:: trontnomt vnrlubln at otshcr I! or 313. o: a

ﬁrouﬁuout turtnblus

�$3313

3

___,

by
nun-qutuuml
”hunch”.
Manta“

on Sam.

”I - haunt aoluﬂ“

' '- mun O: thuuﬂl
' - Duncan

11“ch suit-nun
mutton . man or
Inﬂuuuuu
I an" - ”can“ sun“."
. Mam”
"

ii‘lﬁ

3;:

-

n. I. “nun-up
in- ti mo.

m
«I»

4»

am...» he mu: am0

u

r:

.05

p&lt; .0).

on W

.001

�.15.
pcccthlc he rclccaccchtpc hchucch ccctcl ccc trcctccnt
vhrachlcc, clcvcn crc chctﬁcttcclly nightttocat.
fhc dirtcrcnccc 1c tho an cud It! dctc ucy hc a»
rctlcchlcc ct thcir pcpclclhdch atttcrcccccu thc rclccicu
at 13c cc d1cchcr;c cvclccttcn, ccd r cccrc tc 41c¢nccic
at an rctlccticcihc htchcr prcpcrticn c: dcprcccivc illccccccp
uhtlc hhc rclcctcc ct cuc cc hrcchucct cclccticn cc urn
rctlccttcs choir highcr prcpcwttcc c: {cc-t pcrcccc clccciw
tic! pcychcncurcclc cud chcrcchcr itccrdcr. rho ctnilcrthtcc
:- I! and Ill much In: rctlcct ctnilcr trcchccut philcccphtcc,
which crc littcrcct rrcn thct ct Illa. ccudtttcac c: clcchivc trcchucht ccd clccttvc dcrctxcn ct hccpitclxcchlch catch
ct ll cud HIE. and th may hc thin tlcllhtlihy thch pcrcttc
tho inhcrccticc ct tho cccicl vcrtchlcc. 1% lane, hcvcvcr.
tho lththcd cccy cud cccd tcr rcpid trcctccch rcculhc ta h
tctlcrc hc dchchctrchc cc 1ctcrcch1cc ct cccicl vcrichlcc
vtch tho trcchhhct prccccccc.
Similarly. thc rclchtcc ct cccihl clccc vcrichlcc hc
trcchhcht varichlcc 1c hhc lcllxccchccd ccd nclltuh ctndicc
Icy rctlcct hhctr dctc cclcchtca, vhtch vac cvcr thc hrccd
rccxc ct c11 ccnuhcatw :cctltctcc cud cll trccthcah portcdc.
within thcsahcttcnc, hcvcvcr, thccc cccthl thctcrc cppccr
lccc «Incl-.111" ct trcchcct ruichlcc. accusing): cvmcvcrcd
by tctrcccrcl cdhtctccrcttvc ct {sunsctcl ccccccthtcc. 1c
hhc ccrltcr Iillctdc lccpthcl chcdacc ( ) thc rclcttcc ct

�~16-

vnrtubloc
trooinant
‘0
thtad
cit-atlas
0: u... r 3019:,
13 u rdlnation of the krona ndnantn‘rativu 1a£1ta¢ua avntlnhlo
defined
broadly
lrtnﬁnout.
var.
tans.
that
a‘
tn pnﬁlnu‘ car.
with cengﬁtc, nzltou :34 paychoﬁhurnpautto undo. annuity
‘vniznhlo. ”III‘SOQ Ir Incpt‘nlinotton an. broadly duttnod
Anni-lion
policy
1
raga-atod.
19:31:
or
to
up
i:
your,
at
was {113151. and thh taught and purntt‘od tun Ianxslaon or
paﬁtuu‘n ‘1‘» a I10. 933;. a: pcylhlatrxa laouraorc.
the proacnt an Isudy than: (out: locial-trantnont'rctn‘tono
con-ﬁr‘o‘ttn
195?
a
parka»:
‘ha
rollocttuc
than
s‘uay.
nit»!
Lu avgilabiliﬁy a! trcaﬁuont :hoiooa. ta popu1t£1on 33¢ a
uniturn us‘cnnton-cl ditl‘lil at heapttcllulttoa. lit.
new
ad-tntn‘rnliﬁh
a
can‘nlyorcsoouslr
thatlsltad
pitta...
with
closer
no
narkud
a
Granting
axillarity
in
clonal:
$10.,
the Mt! nodal. Such administruttvo discus-10:. arc iosu no
prtutcpal dctorntnlltl or tn. Clorﬂlllﬂ or dist-lutton a:
social vurinbloa, n. ltl‘lrl ta tho trantncnt prostlu.
A lacuna aspect at that. I‘udtoo an: tun Icthodoloctoul
problems In 6011.13: tho ‘roatnon‘ Vtrtnbloo. That. last:tltSOan wort toloctod to: that: cantattouni loudnruhtp and
be
vanld
roomrd¢d
£ho
vurtuono
01¢:rly
tha‘
clygctattoa
it.
uglinod. OI: dirttcultzao in arriving at comparable Asia
oouvuattonnl
at
a:
$ht-prdblnn
to
one!
in.
tupcrtant
tit
at.
OOIplrﬁﬁiyi it;$ia£ion. 0330015117 1- £3. ovulustton a:
psychiatric therapiou. rho trnquun‘ nu. at dilahnrco ratings,

�-17-

dtncnolttc .11.... or Iongth at houpisaltnatton an ortturta
or thorlpputic vnluou at conpnrubtltty or nuts-ct: and poppItttona urn Iibaoct £0 can-031v. array pal... tho inuttﬁnctono
puraduxtn
naschnd
adulatutrntivo
patparuu.
tar
clourly
It.
It.
cal uupuro at a :atluru ts anounat for this vurinhlo 1- to be
6511
dbucrvnﬁtoa
‘hc
of
a
in
tutprprctataon
lttcrnl
t:
Iii!
cindy. an. urn hi! it: most highly train! per-canal oondutttnu
troainunt think is applxud for indivicunlly tottaoﬁ,¢ptxan1
portods o: ‘llis it populations with it. 1...‘ propurtion
danunouod 1p nu unfavorabls

pritlll‘it

group (achilophronin)

-

1.
uncultl
(cvorlblo
tracing-t
a:
rot.
th. pOOIOIt. At Illa, 1n contranﬁ, tilt. in: lonat traluod
shtruptacﬁ apply transient. for nu adutntutrativnly llutsnd
patina, ‘0 t papnlattou ‘1‘! a tight! prcportlon dtnuuoacd
Ichisophrpnia. tho proportten or tnvorablo itscharxt rating:
in lixutticnutlr grouper: It 1- prubsblo thnt thun- ohlcrvuu
£303: a. sop rutloc£ thy tharapcusac atticppy 0: photo snap:1n
inﬁtcatodb
ortsorta o: tuprvvo~
attics-loan
tu‘ttul, 3"
~- tad

tho proportion

uonﬁ.

this lack a: alsritv in «tacuautta achcunﬁ¢ and lacunpnrtbiltﬁy or psychiatric trou‘upnt variably. all. landpallc to th. t‘tcnptnd acuparupivc studio: or payohtntria
thorpptca. Pb: asunplo. tho rank at rooont failurns or
biolcgtcal Ioaonticsu to Courtru ubacrvutioan Ill. 1: «that
labor-tartan rip he I: unch a rutloctinn 0: 11:10:03... In

�.18.
popnlnﬁsoul. paynhaatrin orssortu,lggg. an tullaniou it tho
or131ua1 hip-thus... tin vtdnspmoad no. or tank turns :-

”Ichzscphroaiu' or "plynh'aamtoaiu' to unplarc £hn shuns-n
13 pnyubutagtoal or biological toninraa with nouﬁaz ilincsc
has 106 it a Icioaea burdonod by ungattvu rctaign (Iellak),
nont narkod rocuntly 1n tho nontliettng studio: at I tdrll
false: in auhaauphroutn, :3d the tact-pur‘btltty or the
yhyutologtoul -. hohnvtorcl corrcluttnn: scan in tun u0choly1
(Fulton-toau) and sedatiau thr¢lholﬁ tnakt. Esta nor. 3
valzd abourvn‘tou to be ropuriod :rcu on. clinic, dc a. havo'
nothtdi available ‘0 deliriho poputlilonl manqua‘nzy £0
providc ‘ sound nontlrnatlon? w. haltovu hat, and nonoludc
from thugs dbnurvuttcls that incranacd attention unst be
paid to she uathodolaaaaal prnblun: o: alttsityina uuhjocta
hy 'vb:oot&amp;vo“ cratcriu, rather than ﬁns prosoat untied!
whack appear to b: a. hichiy dopoadont a: institutionnl ;ad
otuarvar nttittana. In: the oouiopaychological 339.0%. .2

‘3. thﬂllptltupl§103‘ tltcrtctiou.

�IleI I
can? a nu

at Bil:

WW
1. nnprunaav‘ rouctson
Surciaozntlo Puruonnlitr

1: no:

WM“
1 61-1-

“mm

Payohcncnrostl

2. Auxtuty Roaution
larttnntutia Parlounlaﬁr

Payohnaonrootl

3. larcttsiutia ?urlcan11my

tartan-11::
$

h. lurcatﬂiutlc Par-annlstr.
Alcohcttun chronic
Intintilo PartinIISty

I acuiuputhic
Put-onaltty
Btuturhusoo

S. Pausivn Augrcuuive
P¢rsoun1$ﬁy
Alcoholiun

Suctcpcthic Purcoanllty
Disturhllco

6. Inthn‘iln rarncnnlzty
Schauophrtntu Ronltton

StuttOphronlo vaychoail

,

Suhiﬁl-Aflloﬁ1Vi*2¥pl

frtit
31I£I§bnnio

�TAELE

c

1

5‘

1
of
I: on
g; gaggs‘nl aacahnrgo

8a.:

tin.

Ii

u

,

Illa
ﬂoats: tgguai-ant

Ruusvuroi

luouvavud

Inpmuvod

Bach Inprvv‘d

unrkodly InprQV'I

Untaprovvd

Invrdvnd

lodurntolr Improvul

alllprcvod

81133‘17 Inprovod

Hltnprcvud

couplate Ronanaign
2aprov.d
v‘ahnugcd (u: wits.)

�ans-$3

:33»!
.

i:

on

.,

w

W

M

.

-

V.

ma

w,

,-.M
,

u.

x

n
Ha

‘ a
WE

w

m

V

m

Vino

W4

m

.w

Vacs.

gm

H1

II

”Sup-32a

a

I'_I"II

3.33..

V

mﬁuﬁﬁﬁm

.63.

I;
Eu.

as

PH.

no

in

�EQELE V

:2!

an

kl

173

we
v’-82.8;

39

dtwhx

p¢.061.

’

21

h:

36

36

6h

0

ah

68

a

! principalxr lilies thsrtplio

�me

95

x'.?0.6; “'1” V5.09!

�331.8

quttt‘u

I

an
g!

m

‘

’

Rum“,
rum

n

'1;

«huand
d

1

c ﬁ

Imprond

ﬂux-yam!

99

1

an

1.9

17:

23

6:

15

as

61

10

mc-

x*-29.3; «rub; p«.oat.

�Y

Ilstttntaau

.

V

I

WM).

l

achtgophrtnia

Puyuhonguronia
and
E'
7

ml
m1

male

171

.

85

t"13.8h1 43-h; pﬁoanl.‘

far-onaliﬁy

O;

!'

J££o¢ttvo

33

$2

5

52

26

:92

SL

29

16

�A

Couporioon o: sooioplyoholoaiool Voriobloo and

Poyohlotrlo trootnout 1o Throo Voluntary Hoopitolo

Robort L. Kuhn, Ph.D.', no: Pollock, Ph.D.

lothoniol Siogol, Ph.D.
oud

m ﬂak,

um.

tron tho noportuont of Suporinootol Poyohiotry, Hilloido
Hoopitol, ﬁlo: Oaks, L.I., 5.1.
Aidod, in port, by grout HI-ZOQI of tho lotionol Inotituto
o: Kontol Koolth, 0.8. Publio BooIth Sorvloos ond tho loooou
County Kontol Hoolth Hoard.

tho cooperation of tho ototto of tho Hooooohuootto Montol
Hoolth Contor and tho 0.1. Hoaninlor Houoriol Hoopitol 1o
lrototuily ooknovlodcod.
o Prooont Addrooo: Divioion o: Poyohiotry, Houtottoro noopttol,
I.!. 67, 3.2.
VII: 3/62

�In thair atndy a: tha lav lavas payahiatria patiaat
populatiaa. lailingahaad and Badliah rapariad aignitiaant
raiaiiouahipa batwaan an individuai'a paaitian in tha aohial
aliaa airuatura and tha pravaianaa a: traatad iilaaaa, typaa
at diaguaaad diaardara ind kinda and duration at payahiatria
traatnaat adniaiaiarad ( ). Thay indiaaiad that prapartian~
ataiy aura lava: aiaaa paiiaata in traataant vara aiaaaitiad
aa payahatia whiia uppar alaaa patianta vara naraattan alauaitiad aa naaratia and paraaaality diaordara. ﬁagardiaaa at
diagnaaia, payahatharapy waa anplayad in diaprapartianataly
high dagraaa with iha uppar alaaa patianta, and urgauia
iharapiaa with iavar alaaa aahjaata.
W”
Tha intiuanaa at aaanaaia atatua
tha availability
aau‘gviat
lﬁkaualndad in thaaa atudiaa.
at traating paraanual
fa iaat tha raia at aaeiai taatara in tha traatnant at hoaa finanaagfaui
iadapaudani
at
patiant
patiant'
pitaliaad
M“:
JJ’availabilityat iraataauta;a patiant aarvay vaa undertakaa
at Biliaida laapiial in 1951. In thia haapitai, a variaty
at traatlant nodal, inailding individual payohatharapy and
organic tharapiaa at. availabia to .11 patianta ragardlaaa

3”“

at thair ability to pay.
In that ....!G. aga, adnaatian and piaca at birth var.
aignitiaauiiy aaaaoiatad viih ahaiaa at traatuaai, duratiau
at haapiiaiiaatian, aliniaal diaaharga avaiuatian and

�.2diecneeie ( ). The elinieel teetere were elee releted to
e eeeenre e: etereetypy, the celiternie F snele ( ). Higher
r eeeree eere nere etten round in petiente diegneeed en invelntienel peyeheeie referred for eeuetie therepy end heepi~

telieed fer e eherter peried ( ).i
11..., mﬁﬂﬂ‘iv W”
It eee eenelnded thet the elGIItI-et eeeiel eleee, ege,
education, birthpleee end degree or etegzgggpy en peyohietrie
i:3§::§:7gi
eeeienie
treeteent petterne were not
teetere er
eveilebility er treeteent eleee. One eezgeetien wee thet
eeeiel teetnre influenced dieueeeie end treeteent by etteetin: the verhel end nen-verhel eynpten petterne e: petient
behevier. It wee peeteleted thet eehjeete et lever eoniel
eleeeee, lee-er edneetien end tereicn hirth would eere
frequently eeniteet eyepteee in nen-verbel, eeneery or enter
pettnrne end would expeet phyeieel eedee e: therepy. Upper
eleee eehjeete eenld etiliee verhel neene e: expreeeien,
end eetieipete peyehelegieel teree er treeteent.
A eeeend interpretetien releted
peyehietrie treeteeet
to the phileeephiee end ettitedee at individnel peyehietriete
end heeyitel etet: ettitedee. In inetitntiene where peyehetherepy wee highly velned, upper eleee petiente would he
treeted dieprepertienetely with peyehetherepy. Sieilerly,
dieeherge eveleetiene end deretiee e: heepitelieetien weeld
he etteeted by dittereneee in etet: expeetetiene for individuele of differing eeeiel eleee.
”Sikhs/W!

�toot thio ooooad hypothuio no dooidod to "put to
Hilloido (an) otody ouployinx tho Iona prooodoroo out
l'o

1957

oonoorroatly to oxtoud tho oboorvotiono to two othor institutions, tho 0.}. nounio‘or Honoriol loopitol of fopoko
(HIE) ond tho looooohoootto Hootol ﬂoolth Cantor of Bolton
(ulna). rhooo inotitntiooo not. oolootoo in tho oxpoototioo
that they oorvo potionto o! ditroriag oooiol olooooo and
that ditrorooooo in thin di-oooiou would ho rotlootod in
tho trootnont variation. In thooo hooptolo thoro in o oinia
lority in ottitndo souordo trootooot and oduootiou. Each
in o tooohinc hoopitol with a toll tin. ooporvioory ototr
and ootivo rooooroh doportooot. rho: onphooino poyohoonolytioolly-oriontod porohothoropy but provido othor trottuonto including oonotio thoropioo ond ootivo procro-o o:
nilioo thoropy. Book otrooooo chart-torn trootoont o:
voluntary potionto, dooo not provido oootodiol ooro and
tonde to draw ito potiont populotioo tron oinilor ozo croopo.
tho opooitio tin; of this study voro to dotornino population dittoroaooo botwoou tho throo institution: with roopoot
to oooiol olooo, ago, oduootion too I oooro, nod to roloto
tho-o potioot ohorootoriotioo to tho trootnont voriooloo or
typo or trootnoot, duration or hoopitolilotiou, diagnooio
and dioohorxo ovoluotioo.

�Uh.
HEIIOD

valaatary, adult pattanaa 1a validaaaa in thaaa
taattauttaaa an a titan data in January 1959 wara aaad£ad.
whsla 8!! and El had valaatary paataata only, a aaall nuabar
a: thaaa at zinc vara aaatsaad by aha eaarta tar payahiatrta
avalaaataa, at wara aanbara at a abrania aahtaaphraaio ataaa
hospital group tranatarrad for a apaattia raaaarah proJaat.
Thaaa patlanaa vara aaa}gaa§mgaan tho atudy baaauaa at that:
aaa-valaaﬁary atataa. fha laud: popu1;‘1.§“;;hai§£;§”;g:§i3
tag-“ice at m and 95 at me. nub
van
W~_MM' W._~.»M~_~-w
gtvan tha calitarnia I aaala ( ) an aha daaigaatad aaaa.
is 0!“ ”Univ;
MM
Eightaaa aoutha later tha-paﬁtaata' raaar ‘Awara aaaiyaad.
to. MMML
and
tho
aha
variaua
aaatal
taatara
at
payahtatria
atady.
)far
a£3~3:::::2:;tton
tar
at aaazal alaaa, tho Ballingahaad
2-taatar tad-x was aaad ( ,). Tho atady inaladad aaaatnaaiaa
at tha ralatiana of tha aacial ta tha payahiatrta variablaa
within aaah inaattatian, as wall aa batwaaa inattantiana.
‘rhaaa aaaparlaana provad difficult baaauaa at airfaranaaa in
tha dattataian of tha paychiatrta variahlaa, aha variablaa
L11

mung";

pl;;t

cut-at: aritaria could not ha
dataraiuad, and varying dagraaa at ataatag data. Far axaapla,
ta aaapara inatitutiana in ralatiaa to laacth a! haapital

raucad widaly and camparahla

atay. variaaa nag-or: pariada vara ariad but aana allowad
rat aaaparahla diatributtaaa. At Hyﬁ, ana quartar a: an.
pattaata raaaiaad ravar thaa aavan aaatha. aad awa-ahlrda
a

�.5.
Into tuna twclvo acuthu. At ulna, in contract, 701 at .11
pation‘t rcnntnod 1... than IOVOI noaths. tad onzy 61 not.
than 3201?. angina. In actor-intng 0.01:1 .1... that. van
tarnrnnttou availnbll for 292 of 371 patiouta. Unclaucitxablo
Ctlll accurrtd whoro tn. educ‘tion or the unaband or a honouwtto If the tathnr or a liner VII nut rouordod.
Loonrdinu, 1n $ho nutty... a: paychiatrio vnrinblot
inphllll V111 bu plaacd on tho dittcrcncoo botvoou tuititu‘lonn,
with c1t:txon or rolovnnt tnttu-inatltnttonal rolntaonnhtpa.

�Katharina“! “no.“
what! "parts.“
tn:
hatun
I
tnutuuou,
“at”
11
and
“icon
for
of
tho
“that
hospital
crust“,
"not”.

1.
4*“

2y“

1,:

,7)

§

)3

§

Pg
«
§

3

studying
in
brieﬂy.
“attend
ﬂavour,
{LR $ Q
1:”er
77W
', 0”]
M
and
author Guplrlbli d».
44W
stunting
inﬂation
3:.
ﬁg
.W'
3'.
M”
batvua
tho
undo
1at
q
dirt-rue”
luuumm.
any
m\
an
3N
M
”1:1” (Md “on. ﬂu hospital. org-nuts.» u a dour-tun at twat-x § Q1: 9.
3*
”3%:
both
sh.
pr-Obltl.
03mph,
)W
tumultuous
hr
no“
Q‘s
an
u
‘
Mﬂg
3
3g
an
do“ not.
7“ MM 1mm and am In" in: lupin]. nun, while
(ft; Q
3‘
mfg?” At me the trotting phynuua u: can for a pttuu u a ‘E Q“k
and
tho
as
1n
é
day
the
utter-nu
hospital,
W‘ﬁjw Min-pun“,
x
i
to
In
tool
1%
In
;.1. 1,,
no):
a
auburn
«a
in.
“tuna.
cunts.
w
k“
g
M";
knowing
tho
at
hoopla!
the
«run“to,
patient in:
”ﬁle/:4 ,
a
WV 15%”,
11111
ha
hi:
tar
patint'u
to
ruponltblo
«to;
um
can
%
1;.
'bj’whuuﬁ
up»)
gt an, “sour” nun urination or “at puunA” MW
auto:relation“?W M” Jr
1M
Vb 5
0:
the
Authcr
$4,
III
pubic:
51/”
“than
prune.
running m. {Lu
u}
NM
5”” w”
M.
use
tbs
.2
_..,
011““).
an.
"nun“.
‘y prurun, “tuna:
W”
w
g‘éﬂm
w
tho
at
approximately
pan-nu
“any para."
u
«may,
W
{
to:111
had
and
bun
chronically
hospitals!“
mo var.
“wwizof rb
Mara
would
not
normally
1:
luv.
bun
Sun
group
I
yuan.
any
ﬁg
Wu;
MW"
thin nuptial bit they had bun trmtornd tron author

m

O
|

9'

1,.

.

|.

“0:

ax-

.

in

8
v

8

”L

e

,

A

_

.

Mk

M

‘

3

‘35

’

3

\
g

,

.

x

‘

W”

,5

l

i

'

W"

.

l

at.“ human“ for a ”001.1 ““1.
Thu, tho vary not." no In" int-tutu

/

in studying

,4"ch

‘

�~80

diagnssol unpluynd tho unltipIo avnl‘ativu d.ta Ichuuo
rootuaondod by tin Anortcna Psychiatric LIIOOIQ‘itl will.
both an and nuns rollovod Iaiﬁary nyuﬁunl. 8.7.!!! uxanploo
a: dllﬂlllll tram I)! are liatod 1n Idblo I, with on: on;goutod oonvoruioaa into ottngoricn coaparablo so the cthor
two institutiona. {hone aonvorlioul provide, horcvcr, an
unavaidnblc neuron of dfstartaon. (31-11nr ebonrvntinln havban rap-rut! by Pun-nut and his uuetntoj ( ) who
indicts. th.t diagnoous riﬁhin the can. tantikutiou arc die
valuarnblo to individual ditturoncoc anon; anguinnr-J
-“--I‘-----QTtblu I
c) Dilahsr 0 anti 3 at In rovcm¢n%: Ratings at inpravc:ont varind in (grant and detail. the dischargo rating It
KPH In: triparti‘o with a liptruto cvalustion for
social,

attractorcloliual

and cyndrouo Chlnloto

an and Kane had

glob-1 ratings in which it was dirtiault to .0303: the con—
trtbution or cash factor at th: urn tyntan (rubl- II). For
this Itudy the urn urndrono rating VII compared to tho glqbll
ratings of an and mane.

T‘bla
2. Socioglzeholoitcal Variable.

II

�-9“

a) Socitl Gina-z that. val I narkod dittoronoc in tho
lociil ulna: oonpouition of tho thro- iuttitttions (Table 111).
3%
an
BEE
01:00;
tho
produninaltly
population
uppar
In.
it
niddia olaun; tad at axle. pradcninaatly lava: Ola-u.
b) 5.3: Thor. turn as dittaruncun in In. dilirihutiou
in the institutional popuiitiano.
0) Education: Tho populitionl dirtorod in cduantioual
1%
HIE
with
having nor. yoirl or adieupaticatt
utttinncni,
tion than that. it HERO. While kl p02 aunt of tho pttiontl
HERO ttilod to cosploto high annual, only 32 par cent at
it
KPH
UK and 23 par cont
it did ant ‘raduntc.
d) F Sacra: Dittoruncon in the diuiribuiion of scar-I
on tho Gilitornia r 80.1. not. obsorvod. ritth~ono par coat
or urn paticntl had P score: below 30, cad only eight var cent
with IBOrCI or 50 or abuvo -- the higher P acorns being O0..cintod with high-r dugrtul o: sturuotypy. In contrast, at
3336 tittty per cont not. Euler 30 on the F 30.1., and tort Knigz;::;pnr—ttnt
$0
two per scat and IBOIII at
or nova. it
bb¢”»130 chad eﬁnuau~ P&amp;c&amp;¢r véu&lt;_z
or the pntiuntl hid F 3002.: ia—ihn—nidd%¢arcntu-huﬁwuuu—3O

'0'”?ch

My

Sowua «Jan, 50m
0

3. Pozohiatric Variablu:

Intrgoinutitutionnl «satirinonl urn connoiidatod in
Tabla IV, wail. iuicr-inutituiional ounparinont are proacntad
iadividquly in tack auction. In tibia IV, nirhu uni psychotherapi.a act. conhiuod, parlitting p «cairn-t or countie ind

�.11.

at an and rune. 3.3.310 two‘s-ant uni uolootna for pattea‘u
clan-itlcd an achisaphroain and atfcotivo disorder not.
titan than than. Illlﬂid an paychonuurmszo u$ Illh hoapitll.
At HFH, pattou‘a rocolvtll unantio troaiannt (prodcninautly
than. 01.8.06 an nthiaoyhrania) rocnlvod dinohsrso ratingot uninprevnd nor. ofton thus putiuata roooivina psychathcrapy
alone.
b) Duration of Boagitaliuttiona 23. turn. instituticua
agitated with roapott t0 ptticnt'o longth of ctny (Tabla VI).
MPH patients VII. haupitnliscd
leascls, with 65$ of pat1¢atl
runtiniag t0: twelvo lanth- or torn. cenpatua ‘0 31 par cont 0:

patioutl and 0:1: 5 par coat a: that. it nuns. rho
3.4.1 ttay .1 it. i3 group was hottocn IIVOI and «lurch
nonthn Hull. twenthirén of tho XHHC patioata wort diachuracd
within six 393th: at hoapttnlisatton. 3031.1 «1::- and
F acorn worn 30‘ rnlutod té dira‘ion at any institutian.
or tea psyghiatrio variabloa, only diazuoaia 00‘1d b. taint-d -

in.

HE

as tho». diagnonod a. achinaphron1n war. hospttnlaund to:
longer porlodn It sunk inutttution. At avury at. 10701, that.
at RFE rouninaé $0.30: th¢a It 33 or Mlle. Ind-oi, tho in‘cr-

institutionul ditturonotl rat. to grant ‘hat 3 pttiont in
th- oldut go pup nu It" 11h): up In lac-punts“ :cr
tvlov. tenths cw not. at KPH ‘htl war. pntioats in tho
yonncont as. graup at HXKO.
Within

ill‘iilt10nl..‘IO

nudmodnoatton As xv: and an

�-12u

honpttnltnatiaa ~- youaxnr lid 10!:
oducatod putt-at! rinutntng for tho lingolt period

worn roln‘od to lunght of

Q-.-“-O-QC“-- .O-”--.
rabzo V1 abuut her.

-U.---'...--’--Q-ﬁ--.~
a) Diuoharlc Evaluation: In cash helpitnl, ants patiouta
are ovnluatnd ut th. time o: disaharto :&amp; "taprovcd" (Tabl. VII).
9: pattnntl worn
a IIQEI. p¢t1¢nt who call-d

At KPH, hoV¢vnr, u high-r porountaun (19$)

rntud a: ”unimprovcd” and «317
”gooovorad" or ”much improvad”. Tho hiahu:£ purncntago or
”roeovorod" or ”such 13336706" r;:1nsa (28$) :ud tha lowcat
NHEC.
(10%)
"unimprvved”
{tuna
a:
ct
war.
proportian
Analya¢a within «ash institution Chalid Ttriiblﬂ roanltc.
At an tad H336 thorn was t tondonay far 9140: puticuta to ho
ratcd hatter than youaanr onus, but uh. results arc ut:ttlt1¢33.
Aﬁ
H33
thorn wan II OppOlt$O
anly
at
aixnirieant
all?
trund, with older pationta nor. ltkoly to ho rctcd nutupruvod;
but this 616 net aahiove ntatiuticaI signiftclnao.
-ﬂ‘----‘-ﬁ-“ﬂﬂﬂ’.9351: VII

-O.--’.-‘-.ﬁ-¢--.
d) Diauneais: Fer neltiutiaal annlyulu thrco diltnﬁi‘lt
groupfingc were mudo: achisophrouit, tffottivo aiaordcru.
disardora (Tublt VIII).
Th. alcgnontie propertians «or. similar for tho an tad Hana

und puychoneurcsin anﬁ pnr¢¢aa11ty

�.13.
purulntaonu, but it. It! patluuta wort tiﬂlrdol s. h:v1:¢
tow-r atttattvo ate oohasophrcnto 1100:4013 and n.13rxcr
author a: plyohcnonrotic or port's-11:; disordatl.
Intrainatitutianal nnulylis abound that at RH both as.
tad F 000:. not. rclatcd to ditcntats; &amp;% HER use alone at
thu nociul factorx uni ralstad to diaguoais; while at EMHG
hﬁﬁﬁ 0f ﬁle social varigbloa were so related. 0f ha payohzattiu variables, diagnoatl wan significantly rulnhad at
Ollh hospital to solootion or tdnatnant aha auratian of
and(§ging:iélta
diucharge ev‘luttien.
haspitalinttioag

"'----’“-”-ﬂ”. u-~u~q~a25310 VIII about barn
u---~-‘n---—-h-~n”ca—umu—Mﬂn

�~1hDISCUSSION

In this comparison of throo voluntary psychiatric
hospitals as havo obsorvod significant intorinstitntional
dirtoroncos of pationts in tho social varioblos of yoars
o: oducaticn and social class, but not ago; in distribution
or California F Scalo scoros; and in oach of tho troatnont
variablos -- duration of hospitalisation, soloction of
troatnonts and distribution of diagncsos and dischargo
ovaluatinns. pTho littoroncos in troatnont variablos botwoon
tho institutions nay rosnlt from many factors, including
tho social aspocts highlighted in our initial studios. To
,.__ Ar
7-“,
dotino tho rols of social factors noro cloarly, no nndortook tho intra-institttional comparisons. Fron thoso analysos,
tho lack of oonsistont rolationships londs doubt as to tho
rclo o: pationt social factors as principal dotorninants in
troatnont within thsso sottinss. It was anticipatod that
within oach institution, pationts or highor social class,
lowor F sccro and hottor oducaticn, would ho trootod proton-4
ontially by psychothorapy, classitiod as nourotic, romain
for shortor poriods and roscivo bottor disshargo ratings.
Within tho institution, an irro ular association botwoon tho
(Tablo:;§;).
variablos was obsorvod
Within ono institution,
tho HHHC, ncns of tho social variablos woro rolatod to any
...--

v

troatnont variablo; nor was social class statistically ro~
latod to any troatnont variablo at sithor KB or MFR. Of a

�-15-

’51,

&gt;

possible h8 relationships between social and treatment
variables, eleven are statistically significant.
The differences in the HE and NPR data nay be at
reflection of their popnlaltion differences: the relation
of age to discharge evaluation, and Fiscore to diagnosis
at hH reflectingthe higher proportion of depressive illnesses;
while the relation of age to treatment selection at MIR
reflecting their higher proportion of young persons classified psychoneurosis and character disorder. The similarities,
in HR and HFH uata may reflect similar treatment philosophies,
which are different from that at MHHC. Conditions of elective treatment and elective duration of hospitalisation exist
at HE and MPH, and it may be this flexibility that pernits
the interaction of the social variables. it HHHC, however,
the limited stay and need for rapid treatment results in a
failure to denonstrate an interaction of social variables
with the treatment processes.
Similarly, the relation of social class variables to
treatnent variables in the Hollingshead and Rellioh studies
may reflect their data selection, which was over the broad
range of all community facilities and all treatment periods.
Within institutions, however, these social factors appear
less determining of treatment rariahles, seemingly overpowered
by intramural edninistrative or financial necessities. In
the earlier Hillside Hospital studies ( ) the relation of

�.16.
svoru, an: cducataul tn tin ‘routnnu‘ Vtrtttloc
in t valuation a: ﬁt. brand adntala‘ruﬁtvo latitudes tvntlnhlo
£011.04
broadly
ltoutnon‘o
not.
tans.
tn plttcnt 0.20 t‘ that
with nonattu, natto‘ cad puythoﬁlnrupuut1n Ind-I aquaixy
i'ISXIUIGo Duro§aou at hingt‘ultsattou was tread}: tuttnod
gs up ‘u 1 1I¢r, If longs: at rotunl$nd. hints-1's p.131:
tun
.1
and
udnislttu
and
bath
IOIIk$
par-titan
(Icntblo
II.
dtnordorn.
at
var'hlasrto
vtth
runs.
'1‘.
I
pattian
f01§$$OI~
socxnlutronincn£
(out:
In
titan
In: prtnott I‘l‘!
constructxon
a
1951
rotlac£1nl
parity.
Itndr.
aha»: its: than tvusluhtlitr a: urinal-at ch¢1¢¢l. in pavulnttun and a
intturu cu‘auliou at d§ru610| at hocrtttitlutxol. this
with
nan
:dn:nlttracultauporaacauslr
tuttxiutcd
:
prion-I.
itﬁt
clout:
marina
a
Itntlnraty
070.11.:
at
tics. is nio-zlr
adutaautruﬁivo
daucasaioua
as
Buck
III!
Iodci.
8!!
It.
tn.
it.
dinuolutltn
at
or
Itﬁcrnxnnnta
thoracic.
tr
yrtnzcvll
0061.1 Vilil‘ltig ca titttri 1: tin trolmnont prcacal.
A loalnd tlpoot c: that. Ituiica 3:3 tin nathodcloctonl
prdﬁloun In dottnln; tun traits-at vurtﬁbioa. Thai. tact:ﬁuﬁaous var. Iclootoa it! ‘hoir causatisngl ltuanrahty and
‘ho capacﬁa‘ton that tbs rooardul variable! wouId ho altar}:
dofiutd. OI: dirttauiticc in Ittlvtts as Odlibrtilirdtil
$h¢
cauvcatlosal'uno a:
anon
at
‘0
sh.
gratin:
.r. tap-rtaut
cuuparntagu o‘ttintlnu. alpuntuIXI 1: ﬁt. ovuluu£1oa a:
purch3n%rlc thornpxnu. it: truancnt II. It diachnzao ratings.

.3 ago.

D

�-17ae
or
criteria
hoapiteliaation
length
diaguoetio cleaner/or
of therapeutic valnee or oouparability or aubjeeta and populationa are subject to oxeeeoive error unless the inatitutione
The
paredoxipa+torna.
adninietrativo
notched
for
are clearly
'7
be
to
ie
oal nature of a failure to aooouht
aeon in a literal interpretation of the observation or this
HFH
conducting
boo
personnel
The
highly
the
traini
loot
etudy.
treatment which ie applied for individually defined,eptina1
periods or tine; in populatione with the least proportion
diagnoeod in an unfavorable prognoa io group (aohiaophronia) ie
roenlte
treatment
and
the
proportion
yet,
-o5\£avorabla
the poorest. At HMKG, in contrast, where the laaet trained
therapioot apply trootnente for an adniniotrativaly limited
period, to a population with a higher proportion diagnosed
eohioophrenia, the proportion of favorable discharge ratings
in eignifioantly greater! It is probable that thoaa observationo do not reflect tho therapeutic ottioaoy or theoo inotitutiona, but indieataﬂi dittoronoee in criteria of improve-

for@

Iont.
Thie laok of

clarity in diagnostic

aohomata and incom-

lendo
a1ae
variables
treatnont
e:
payohiatrio
peribility
pauae to the attempted comparative etudioa of psychiatric
t ranioe. For example, tho raeh of roeont failure: 0!
made
confirm
other
in
to
aoientiate
‘/h(c£jﬁau!§iolozioal
obaorvettfno
laboratories may be as each a reflection of dittoronooa in

�-18..

fallooioo in tho
on
such
torus
of
The
use
widospzood
hypothoaoo.
original
“oohioophronio” or "poyohononrooio" to oxploro tho chongoo
in poyohologiool or biological rooturos with nontol illnooo
hos lod to o ooionoo burdonod by negotivo rooulta (Bollok),
noat marked roosntly in the conflicting studios of o serum
factor in schizophronio, and tho inconporobility of the
tho
nooholyl
in
soon
oorrolotions
hohovioral
physiological -(Funkonstoin) and sodation throohold tasks. Even were a
havo'
do
wo
from
ono
be
clinic,
roportod
valid oblorvotion to
nothodo available to doooribo populations odoquately to
ooncludo
Ho
and
holiovo
sound
confirmation?
not,
a
provide
from thaso obaorvotiona that increased ottontion nuot ho
paid to hho nothodologiool problono of olooolfying aubjooto
mothodo
tho
than
presont
rathor
"ohjootlvo"
by
criteria,
which oppoor to bo so highly dopondont on institutional and
ohoorvor ottitndoo, and tho oooiopayohologiool oopooto of
tho therapist-pationt intoraotion.

populations, poyohiotrio oritorio, 323.

Uﬁﬁ})*l

1"

t

no

�”ﬂu“
Wing

mun.

nupwum: 1V.

Beneﬁt.»

Mun“. rmuw

AnzacQV

mm“

3.

magnum: Puumu‘y

rum-nut.
running mu

h.

l'mmuty
mus-u:
nub-1m em.

f 8001me

Imus)... Formula”

S.

6.

I'm“.
Farm

“mun

in

tau-nu rwmuw
Batu”

nun-pm.
Baum-ulna" W

-

1’me
“than”

Winn
rumba“

Pmbmuw

annual-n1. Ply-haul

�z§gLs g;

W
W

Ithovod

Inst Inprovud
Untnvrnvud

coupluia nonalciao
Ihwruvud

Btuhtngad (or aura.)

�am

1

M9

m.
m

“mu
on mm

'

i

‘

h).

sa

5

want“ In"..

cm

W

33

3:

mm“ an m

�am
um:

0)

U)

a

g

a:

g

.

H

auton,ann

.

.m.m

So.

E?

So.

0&amp;5»

an

a

llllll'llglllllllll
in
CO

E3

nonansao&gt;m

a“.

o

H‘ad

.m.m

Mina-«n

can»

an

m
“no
no.

3E

Hand

pm

a

.

an

n
8.

—:o«a~uwnu¢«.uom

and.
guaoﬂanncm

.8.
we

ncvd.lomcuhnaH

nodunuvm

«uncanny

.

am

«a

So.“

ma

mo.

«nonvooua

M.
no.

mm

.

nauaeadcm

3.

mu

.

.

«6

nuddo

“;o«anu«n¢aumuom

mouoauﬁahm

aoaaanuun

Queen

n«uo:uu«n

ouudaunun
newcauun

“Canon

a:

h

�m1

.

u“

m

�‘

*

M1” .4

m

H

m

.

a:

It
3?
,

67

Innsh

OM: $.00),

'

13

$5

a

’1

an

s

�ms
X"2’a3i

‘

as

«mush:

mum.

u

a:

10

�Inattﬁuttau

I

schlnophr-ntt

rayuhtuanrosiu
it};

m

n
me

‘

171

-

as

x'-8)~3h1 ﬁrth; p¢.60m.

Pursuant:

and

8 .1. ..
1*

_

5’

5’

53

35

51;

V

art-1‘11.

.99

s

&gt;

22

1‘

�ms]:
Mutts-ant

awn-«um: human
on

stun

m" haunt
01'
lap-11.13““!!9mm
.
ant-cum

-

"

-

W1-

mum xumm
at
man
mm
"ﬁnalising
"

..

~

1

8m mud»
"
.

n:

-

W

5.10.“..-

uts-«mug
W ti m.

n-

w

m
u
m

E
‘0'

M

0"
'3'

m

a

a

a

00

IWmﬁ tar man a...
a

94.

.05

H

vs:

.01

�IAﬂLE

G0

vnasxox 0!

333313033 BISCRARGﬂ BIAGEEﬂES
1-

n¢prota1v¢ raaatinn

ﬂarciiatatic Portannlity

2. Anxioﬁy Rotation

6.

I

IﬁCﬁARGE E AﬂBBSEB

GEIIRSL CL‘ﬁﬁIFICAT

.

?nyohanaaraa15

narcissistic Forv¢aa11ty

Plyahounurccﬁw

Hareienistzc rattannlity

Faruuaultty fruit Diuﬁurbcuc.

Strainalutia rtrlantlity
Alcahaltsn 0hrnu1¢
Infantile Pattonalihr;

Sﬂﬂiﬁﬁn$h1¢

Paaaiva Aggrnaaivc
Parsonllity
Aleeholian

ﬂociopnzh1¢ Parawnnlity

.

Infantila Pernanality

schisephrenio ﬁnaniion
s¢h$ao~1££¢ut1vo typo

Parsannlity
Disturhiuua

Diuturbanca

schizophrenia Payabalin

�IABLE

‘Gnﬂraattlvz
8311308 0? OLIRIGAL ﬁDRBITIﬁﬂ
oa-

Rauniugor
39¢IAL ADJEEIEEYT

7

it

QIKB

3 3a

Killeida

ﬁﬂﬁﬁ

Raaavnrﬁé

atauvartd

Inprnvad

narxodly Inpravud

Improvwﬁ

Rumh

ﬁninpravwﬁ

Imyruvnd

nodnrntuly Inpruvul

ﬂainprovod

slightly Inpretnﬂ

‘~

stancruax

Imarnvad

Uniaproved
agggaena.
¢auwlnﬁn Rtmianinu

:upmuvsa

ﬂuthuaaud (yr werua)

Uninprovid

�Iutnrinatitutiuuul ntfturauea in Solaatiuu at
Iggltmnng

.

-

.wt_ _m1e
.

w.

m

21

h:

:5

I!

33

6h

6

mm

as

53

a

x2 «52.3

a:

”guru

9

.1,

�taggg

Inﬁorinstatution’l Ditrcrnneil
(5 o!

1n

itiliilti

Duratiuu of not

thjuatu)
month: in gougital

natitutian

x?

7*11

1? 0

aka

22

13

65

”K

27

h?

31

unac

6?

2?

5

:90.6

a: -k

n

�taggg

Intarinatttutional Birrnrcnuau in

Dinahargu Ditgnaoin

Dingnaatte ﬁatcgarius (Par agnt)

Iantitutlou

ﬂ

at;

me

:3 '23.8h

a:

sh

ﬁ { t 001

Payahoncnroaia
aha Purtunuiity
Disardvr

Atrsuttru

b3

52

s

952
‘

an

schitophronis

171:
85

V

‘

52

as

22

Sh

29

16

�ﬁtgﬁﬁ

Inttrinotiﬁntiennl Ditruranuts

X

1n

niachar a Evaluattan

niacharga Evaluatiau {?ar cunt)

Institution

W

RIB

ﬁﬂﬂﬁ

x2 «29.3

df 'h
p,§.001

linororeé,

Inpravgd

Buinpruvod

1

80

19

:3

62

15

nnd

Each 1 srgvod

�.

I.

.

,2

'

‘1‘

’

,

.

'

‘

..

'

‘

‘

v

I

6)
z

'u

m
1&amp;1

tum-au&lt;

2"

‘

�WW“
m m,

rum.
tuna,
m
my» my.

Int-m 1.. mm, mm»,

“I

3.9.

mmwwww

maxim,

“My
m,
hM;WMﬂ~mdﬁ-meam
mammals-nun;
m,
mmmmmmam.
lulu .10

mwammamwmmam
ume.r.wmwmumw
am.» am Palm
mm,
W
‘w

W
T
01’

n.’

:

4‘bv

at

1.2.

�MWWMuM“WMW¢(Mm

mmmﬂ)mmmnmmmm

nmmammmmmmmm,
wmaummnmmmmumm
umw,mwwmnummm
“Mama-mm“). ummmam
mnmwxmwm wthatwm‘w

Wmmwwmmu

ammmum. hmmmmmwortm
mummmwwmumwuw.

hmmswdmnnmmmmzmmm*

«.me

mwmm mu

�“w-

'ml‘tvﬂivamu

«mtmummmtmwm

mawwm‘mmmmm
I.
“mummumummum.

mmwuumummwmmu

umumwmummmm,w'
¢J.rwmmmwm.u'mmm
mummmnummmmm
mmW-umummmammcm
nmwmummmmum
mm
smwummmwmmm. mu.

mmmuunwmmmumw

mmmwwm
m,mmmmmumwn~mm

.am‘m.

”mmmammm “.mummm

mmummmmuammumm,
m,mm3m,mummmwmruuu

’ummmuwaw,mamm

mtmmmum-m. mama-rum

�mmmmmummmmm
(an
ummmmmmamm.
mamm,mwmmmmm.
mm~Wmemmalm,mu

::*:W~*”M1m*~”
“WW

MWWW:WWW,W3W
«mmm‘umwm madam-Worm
,I.

W W,um.mmummmm

�mam-.nmmmmmumm.

wmmmumuwum,
t.)

W

;_

:' 'm

”A

a

m “1% M

W

mmwummt
ammmmmmum
.

.

«mumu‘m mum-«mm

maﬁa-Wum‘ mmmumm
mm,mmmmmmumm
«WWWWMxm-uuwmm

Wuamuwmmmm,
maummmmumutm
mmmummmwmm'mu
‘

E§~

�lvmmm.—v m- n.

5)

mm mmmmmmmmmm

ummmmwmm
mmmmmmmmmmw.
meta-am.

mmammwmmumuvm
ww_mmwmwutnam
mmmﬂm. MWWummm
«um.
nun-mm
mm'mumowmnmum.

uwmnmmmmuumuwlmmm.
mummuaamw. mamumum
mummammlmmmwumammmmt
ummmmwamdmmwmmmmm

mmmwmrmmmmm
«mmmummrmmm.
(1mm.

WI!

mmammamm,m,m

�,

mwrm—W“

W"

mmrsuummmmmumum
gammy.

W:

Mm‘mﬂﬂmuthmiu
maximammmmm. mwmmm
I»)

Wm'mumam;nmunmm

Mgumwummum,mwm.
a: mumummummmuw
s)

m:
m,uummnwmmmmmormm
mum-m
umammmum
ummmnmmmwww,maﬂmm
mmmmmuW-mmm

a)

'

nummammnwmmm.(ma: (1)9393
.
”gm: awdmnmumm
mma‘mWIMMW. mini-muse:
mmmr'mwnatwmprmuu
masoummmmrmcnummmnmm‘
“tn-“aw hm,anpx-mtd
wmmmrmwwmnmm-Mmum
mm”!
m,m&gt;mwmmmmmuenu
mmumm,uwnu¢mmmmmum
1

mummmmmrm. WWW“

'msmmmwummormmm

�mwmmwmumm
mammal WQMMiWMWM“

wmmmmmmmmum
m, ma—mwwmmnmmmmm‘
mummmuu‘mmmmwu
mmmm,mwmm.
mmmwmm,mmwm“

mummm-Wmm,mmnmmw
ummgmmmaomwwm.
'ummumuw, mm,murm

mwmuwmm(mwm
rmmwwmﬁmmmxrm

«mummnw,uapnwmp
WWW
hummus.anme
Wit:Mwumwmmmamum
MM?
Mawuﬁamﬁ
#mée
twat HS?

MMWWWQ
WWQM

Wﬁﬂﬂﬂ

9W“.

�MI
‘

.

o‘lo'u

mammmmummammm

vamwmu-Wnamhuwum

WW,‘WM1§WIIW{WUMMW
www.mm-ammmmmmwm;m.
W?

m
mummammmm
mummmmmmmmmmm

mum

y‘

ammmmmummmmsm. mm
mwmmmmmm,mmwmmuw

mmmmewmuw,ummm

�WW

#

mustmwmumunutmormnw.
mmnzaurwmuumumummuua,
“snowman-Man. mmmumnmutum
Wqummxmot-ounmuumuuu
o:
than
'wmm.m
Willi-Ind
mam,
um mum
m
toners,
It
mthmnhtmumutmlmttmm
M

m,mmmmamxuutmuhrzmmu
the
of
exam
mid.
new
swam M, mm
mswhmnmmwmsm'smm,emm,
mmm‘m,um,m.,mwwmmu,mm
tnmwmmmumumummmo:
ﬂu mam mm tom of W new new.

th;

13

.mwumanmummmumrmmth-thum‘mmmmmmm
“Wummmmnmmmuuutm

mew,mmmmmwwmmu

unmummmmwmmmtua
wuawmumuummmmmmmw
If
utmmm-mumnmmutwmmmr.

mwmmuummmummmm
mam,mmmmwmtma
mm.

WQMtMW,h-mttmmmmmm

�gm.

anmuquw.
Mmumwntmmmwm
nm,umm,mnmmmﬁmmuum.
um,uuuu

MMWMtwnmmm,dmahusm

deMW‘Iﬁ-Wamum
m,mmmmm~mm«m
mnmummtm Mmmumu

mmmmmnnmmmmmm,n
mmnw.m¢mmmmumm. hwmw

tin-mmmmmmmmmuwm
gamma
mmmwmmm

mmmumwa
mummw
mmm,uuwmmtmmummm ma

“stumwmmm'wammnmmw
ammuuxmmaw'm‘ammmmw

WWMH‘WW,‘WWWWK

�”V

1

“.17..

—-m_

—

mmmmummmmum-

-Wamwwmmm gunman

-w—rv-v-rvv

a.

7—WWVVWWW_W—.__.

ummnmmmm ”.mumww,‘

mmwwwwuwmm

7m

"—

WWW—v

N

.

0w

_

“A

.W

..,_,.mw_.—....,.r,.,.-

ww-v.

”u'mm*w
“Mwumw
(M‘m‘
m
W‘i
”thawum W
mmmnmmwm,mwwmmm

mmamnmmmammm

mmmmmmummmw
«mnwammmm,m~wmm
awmmm,m,mmum
“at
mmm,mmmmmumm

J

t;

"

�",wwww

w

.7"-

wry—«W...

..”___,__,

»

«-

.w‘

3...;

Amwmmmnmmwm,

umamwmmmmnmm

www‘wvwa

WW

«p—w‘wmmvw—WW

mmammm,mmmum

WWW-w

”.7“

~
.—

WW.

�TABLE

I
-

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

r

.

.m.

._...-

in...

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

1. Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

&amp;

reaction
Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait

2. Anxiety

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Disturbance

'

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction
Schizo-Affectige Type

~

"

Schizophrenic Psychosis

*4

.

r

.,

.

'

~

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge
MENNINGER HOSPITAL

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

'

Social

Ad

ustment

Recovered
‘1’

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Improved

Much

Unimproved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved

Character Structure

ﬁproved

Markedly Improved

Improved
Unimproved

Unimproved

Szgdrome'

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged

(or worse)

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comparisons for
Sociogsychological Variables

Hillside Massachusetts

Menninger

Hospital Mental Health

Hospital

Center

7%

20

Social

’=121.S

df=8
p&lt;. 001

3h

Class

3b
5

1970

:

.

‘

_

-

Age

58

_

_

S2

Y3=3o 9

dfuh

p- n.s.

12—15X2'9
&lt;12

Years of

Education

16

”

32%

df-h

+

p&lt;.

51%

F

7

OS

X"3
2
df-h9

‘

WWW

Score

hl

SO

p&lt;. 001

8

-‘

-

--‘”

~

~

-~ .. x “hm-ave
-

x-r'

row-'t-t'r.

«ma-Iv: «cr-r\+:w.-:.wv-'--vvwz- ~‘rwrwg

,..\IQ‘W~("" w

my

3‘"5‘WM»WMP

�TABLE IV

Intel-hospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Heminger
Hospital

Psychotherapy
Treatment

Duration of

Hospitalization

Sanatic

-(-19—
21%

Hillside

Hospital

-ﬂl)-

Husachnsetts

Mental Health

Center

—(-D

36%

h3

6h

36

--

7-11 months

27

11 months

Discharge

Evaluatim

Improved
Improved

80

62

Unimproved

19

15

Affective Psychosis
Diagnosis

28%

Psycheneurosis and
Personality Disorder

61

10

�:5”

HOSPITAL STAY
K

ONE YEAR

;P.sTA¥ING,OVER

‘Pﬁ

8‘1

.

20329

I

~

6

36'

“

‘

M

M

-

73

A_

w

Hillside

Menhinger

-‘

.

,

'61

in
I

'

BY AGE

j

:‘35

~7f

6

I

I

‘

3,0

2.5,;

-

.

2’0

,

0

.

.

,

0

0

�7142b,

’-

”‘7‘;

aceiopsyuhelogieal 13:11:00 of
Pnyuhintric Trontnoat in fire. Voluntary loupttuls

Robert L.

Iain,

P&amp;.D.ﬁ,

in: Pollack,

Ph.D.

lathauxol stag-1, Ph.D.
and

an: Pink, 3.5.

tho Bcpartlont of InpurtHOItal fuybhtntry, lillutdn
fro. 61¢:
Oaks. L.I., 3.1.
loapttnl,
Atdud, in parﬁ. by 29.3% lt-IOOI or the latiounl InItStn‘c’
of labial It‘l‘h. 8.8. ,ublic Inllth aorticag and tho Iguasu
County Keats: Bealth Beard.

the cacpcrntion of tho stuff. a: the nan-nonalctta mantel
Italth Ccntar and the C.?. Hanninacr Nauorial ﬂospital 13

grutctully nokaculodcod.
irresant Address: Rivision of Paynhiatry, Haatofioro Hoapital.

l.!.

67, l.!.
7!!!! h/62

�In pruvioua coat-payohologionl s‘udioa or

leapitcl papulntion a.

obncrvcd

educatiou,plutu of birth
aenlu

rut. Iignitiountly

01 galact1on

and

th‘t

scar.

ﬁt. 3:11.1do

tuck a-pccta an :30,
on

the calitoruiu

I

Pointed ‘0 tbs trcntncut variation

or trontumut. «11:10.1 disuse-1.. dura‘iou o:

hacpitaliuatton gut treatment cytltation.

It

was

ltggoutad

at thut tins that tho can. influenco or noelal variation
on

the treat-cut process Inuit b. observed upon: institutions.

to tact this auggontion a: wall as to roylieuto the stud:
within inntitutiona, tho prusont study of three hoapitell

val undattakta.
In

a.

their study or

ﬂu

Baron

panhin‘ric mutant

populsticu. Holliaguhoad and Budlizh rapertud alanifiiaat

rtlntlonthlyu button»

smut”

an

individual'a vanities

1n thu 0001.1

pmduu tented 111”". two:
at amend uurdcra a: nu- ma «nu-n or pay-untu-

duo

troatnont cdnintutarod
economic

status

or

and tho

(

upon tho

).

fl.

influoaeo o: patton‘

availability or trcnt1ag peruouuol

�.-9.
van nut ﬁxalndod in this. :tudlua. 1b tact the :01. of
coats: factors in tho triatunnt.or hoapttaltaod patients
inﬂaptnddnt or puticnt'l tibiae-a 3nd dvcalnbillty of
trnatacnta, I patiout burv.y In: undortakcn It lillolda
1§§7.
in
Ia thza‘hcapita\. a variaty’ct ﬁrockuuut
Ibmyiﬁtl
ptychoéhnrnpy
and organic
Ind-n, including individual
thorupiua are attllahlo to all pattints rlgardlosu or
tags: abilzhy ﬁe pay.
In in. tillaido study. Ian. canonﬁton and 31-00 at
birth cur. utgnttlnuaﬁly nouontatcd ut‘h chain. of trudaaont,
duration at honpatglicntaan. alsuxeul diachnrxo aval‘ntiou Ind
diagnonlt ( ). It Ill ohncvvod that patiuntn hounltnliuod
for th- Ihortnus plrild aura the oldest, had tn. loant cane.»
tic: :36 «are taut liktly to bats hut: foreign hnvu. The:
wit. prudoulnnntly £rc-ﬁnd by ouuvulutvo ‘horipy and rocuivnd
it. not. fuvauahla diachnrsn ratinga. Ibnngur. unttv. horn
and not. sdnaatcd paticnza.uuro hospitalinod ﬁho lenzuce.
puyahoﬁhcrnéy
and goaorallr roaotvod
trantnd prilntlly ﬁr
it: 90020! dischargo rattaga. it. 011310.: (Inter: 0‘3.
51:0 rtluted ta n I.nauru of starcatrpy, tn. culttornia r
80.1. ( ). lxahar I canton Int. tor. o:%ca tound an
pu$1onts diagnccod an invalullannl pagthcutn, ruturrua far
nonntto shorapy. and hasvttaltaad :91 unartor parted, and
nor- Qtttu Uﬂfi vitae as much Anymovod or roger-rod.
it in. 6.01301 to tupont tin 195? .111016. study uuployiug
tha nan. procaaursu nnd nongurrtntly ta axteué who obstrvutaona
I

_

.

�.3lnatitnttenu vtth roopact to social alsas. 33o. oduottioa
and

I

to tho

scorn. ﬁnd to relate than. pats-at charactorlttica

trtct-ont variahlqs of type if troutsont. duration

at hospitalisation, diagnosis

A

and Ginsburg. evaluation.

m

enact: a! :11 voluntary. .dult patient. in roatdoaco

in than. tuititattona

was nadortakou

in January 1959. ﬂh$10

lcln1n¢¢r and Hillatdo Hospitals hnd ‘luatary pationta aalr.

t

3:311 avatar

at tho-e at

Danton were anntguod by tho

tor psychiatric avalnntton, or war. nc-bcta at
aohisophroaxe

stat.

hounttql group tralalorrod

3

can’t-

annual.

ter a optoitia

ruloarch product. Thane pationta war. cxoludad from the
study banana. at tacit non-vuluntcry ntntun. Inch pnttent

III

:17.» th- cglitoraiu

ligation

tutti: lctar

r 39.1.

(

) on

the OOBIII any.

the rooordo or dilohnrgod patient-

voro untlyucd to dotorninu tho c.0131 and psychiatric factor-

ar the otudy. For a mutant. of $03111 glass, the ﬁclliucahoud

�.‘5-

2-tuetor ind-x

was 3.06 t

of 173 putllatn

at

).

Thu

81113140. zoo

study population consisted

at lbaalncor

and 95

at

ti. rnlationu

or

Untouchuootta Haltnl ﬂcalth cantor (nuns).
Tho

study inelndcd «lamination a:

in.

social to th- paychlutrtu wart-hlcu within each institution,

2h...

as wall as butunua inaﬁltatlons.

difficult,

hcunvor, boon-no

fora-con discunncd below.

comparisons were

at variouqnnthodologlenl d1:-

9h... difficulttca var.

nosQ

Infkﬂd 1n the iatrnhaupitnl anupnrasean, and accordingly,

in tin unnlynou a: p-yuhlntpta varinhloc emphasis will be

lantttutiana, with citation

plannd on tho daft-ronaus §atvoen

or

lb. intra-tnotltutiannl tronde.

Whoa

tho otruotnru

rcportlnc studs-u fro! a lone institution,

at tho houpltul 1-

%ahoa

tar grunt-d.

and

01th::

ignored or Icnttunud briefly. Houwvur, in studying a atranco

�a.
institutien

I“. “at
will.

I.

and

author
t6
:ttcuptias
canaarablo ant: ya. in

of tho my

allot-«cu but.” “autumn.

tclcotod than. tuttituttont an eolpurablo in

‘bnchlag, rtaoarch, and troatunut pryxruuu, we

tinc that tho:

are unalika atrnct‘rolly in v.11 think influanca tn. data

at the study. specific prohlona

were notcd 1n dastgnatioul

or type a: trnstu-nt, diaguont1a turns and avuluatiau or

trontnnnt outcono.
a) 90:1 ation a!

a

at

cntlant:

Th-

critorin for

danagatting that a paticut raceiv'd 'pcychotharupy' dirt-90¢
along

an natiwtulu, Idling “Remus: «uniﬁcation

aux-nun.
At ﬂoaningcr Hospital puyuhothurtpy use designated

a trogtnaat qdninictcrod an a pro-criytiou

ball:

by a

stat!

pcyvhiaﬁriat, for which th- pattont via chtrgud a too.
ﬁenatone with tho ptynhintrta rnnidunt were considered

or routine unaiaiutrattva pationt aura.

part

.0

�.j.

it Hillside lsspiisl psyshsthsrspy was

astinsd ss

viih
tho psychistrio rssidsnt. star!
trsstasut ssssioas
psychiatrisss.¢id not

trssii patisuts,

but rsstristsd thsir

activities to supervising tbs residsnt physicians.

it
was

ths Massachusetts xsntsl ﬁsslth csntsr payohothsrspy

assignstsd ss s functiea or

many

disoiplinss -- psyuhu

istris rssidsnts, psychologists. socisi

worksrs. nurses sad

msdiasi studsats. Portal records a: sash ssssions wars nos

routinely insiuded in the patisnﬁ's rscorﬁ and to ssesrisin
which

pstisnts rseoivsd psychotherapy.

it was

nocsssnrr for

this study toss to intorviss tbs reaidsuis in churns

washers of

o: ssch cssa.
b) n

'

asis: individual institutionsl disguostic

stylus slso Isds soupsrissns difficult.

it

lbsnisgsr lsspitsl

disgussss supisysd ths sultipis svslustss ﬁsts caucus
asses-sadsd by ths Aussiosn Psychisiric Association

hsih Hillsids sad asstsu

sun-piss

sails

toil-Ila usicsry systsss. assorsl

st discussss tron lsssiussr sss listsd in 2:51. I,

�-3with our ausgaatad aonvarazana into catacortaa nonparabla

to that of tha nth-r tan inatttationa. Thaaa convaratona

at.

an unavoidahla aaaraa of

distortion. (statlar abaarva-

taona hava baan rapartad by Paaaaaatak and hia aaaocxataa
(

) who

indicata that diagnoaaa within tho aaaa inatitatiaa

ara alao valnarabla to individual dixtaraacaa anon: ataxiaara).
Tabla I

ﬁ---“3) ntgoggg‘a gating; of Igggovaaaatn

gravalant varied

1n

Iattnga a:

1n—

foraat and datatl. rho diauharga rating

at nanninaar loapxtal aaa tripartite with a aaparata avaluattaa
for social aharaatarolaalaal and ayndraaa ahanaaa. I111a1da
&gt;

Raapttal and ﬂaaaaahnaatta aantal Iaalth cantor had aloha:

ntiuga I! in

at

aaeh

which

it "a

difficult to aaaaaa the ontﬁbatton

taetcr of tha Haaaiaxar ayutaa (Tabla II). for

this atudy tho Iaaningar

ayudraua

rating aaa couparad to tha

global ratinaa of tha athar iaatltattana.

�.9.

fibl. I!
2.

aootgzgzggologiog; Vagiablaa
Ina diatrtbattan

at the variation of aooial 01a...

aga, adacattoa and calttornia

institution: in praaautad

1n

r

saala scar: along tha taro.

tabla III.

a) ﬁgg§.;_g;§ggn tiara uaa a Iarkad dittaranaa in
tho aaaial clans coup-attic:

at tho thraa inatttattona.

Nautilus: loapttal tha reputation

was

At

pradantnantly app-r

class; at Hillatda laapttal Itddla alas-3

and

at laaaaahuaatta

lantal Baalth cantar, pvadaainantly 101a: alaaa.
h) 553:

that. war. as airfaronaaa in

ago

«attribu-

patulattaao.
tion in tho institutional
a) Eduggtions

rho populatzoaa dxttarad 1:

tanta-

ttaaal attatnlaat, 11th pattaata at naauiagar leapital having
not. yaara at educattou than than. at Baa-annuaatta lautal

laalth Cantat.

33110

kl ya: want at tho pattanta at also

�-19-

ha: aat couplutad high ottool, only
and 23 per cent

32

par cont at Hillsidt

nt loaningur did not graduate.

Bittﬂrcnccs
é) {nggggy
in ‘3. distributtcu or

can

on tho

annoy-nu I 80.1.. mo obs-nu. titty-cu
V

9.: can: or

lbnnancor puttautn had

only night par cont

I
In

coor¢n below 30, gnu

scorn. of 50 or show. ~- thn higher

accrue 5.13: associated with highor dcgruos or stereotypy.

eaatraat, gt

I Inuit,
At

'1‘!

I

Boston

trout: 9.! coat unto hula:

and forty-two par 3.9% had scores

Hillside thirtybonc

paw

at

30 on tho

50 or nor¢.

south! the vationta had I uaorol

bolaw 30 sad otzhtatn por goat ubOVt 50.

In nun-cry,
.09131 class
'

its

a: the ptpllatiun val oblorvcd :3

uncut arr-nun
on

anticipatod dittorouetu in prudaninalt

ﬁt. r 30:10. 2h.

1a

ago

mutual

dtutrlhatioa

d1£rtrcnoon thus par-1t tho

the institationa.

hum-cat
«14 not

I011 on cigo

an:

mum“

11:20:. Then.

stair a: troutncut variables

along

�sum

Wm

ﬁeduaigﬂgtion a; D§ge§gggg gag‘noggs

M" an mmm

nuproncivo reaction
I. ﬂnrczsaiatic
Foraonality

Payehanuaroniu

8. Anxiety reaction

larezsalatto Personality

3. lavas-oistto Personality
#-

latoisoaltac Puruonaltty
tlaoholiuu Chronic
Infantilo Portolnlity

S. Fusttvc Asgruacivc
’oroonality
Alaaholxaa

6. Infantila Personality
Sohiuophrunsc Ioaotaun

antitanltfucttg. typo

Psynhalturoais
'

Poruouulity fruit
niatnrhanco

sociopathic Paraanality
niuﬁlrbunoo

Seatapnthio Pirwnxrllﬁy
ﬁiaturbanao

achisnphrauic Flywheels

�aggzggattvo ﬁgttugg gt glgngog; geudition

IIIIIHGII

BOSPIZIL

33218132 HOSPITAL

ﬁllﬂlﬁﬂﬂalfiﬂ
gg‘bfﬁ

CENTRE

locovurnd

loaovorod

Each lproved

Eark¢d1y Improved

Ingrovod

Hadnratoly Inprovod

Unznprevod

slightly Inprovcd
Enimproved

60I§10to admission

Ilprlvud
Fuehnnged {or were.)

HEHYIL

�ammonia). muggy»souguzcholoﬁut

1'3;

Yuan“

Hanna. ’nuluhmutn
Ear-pun luau). Rum:

liming"
30-pin).

Gum

31$

75

3%

'

Saul
c1».

.

Au

51

20

as

1?

35

13

1

3h

28

0

S

28

19$

19!
se

59
22

,

p-n.l.

23

at
Ian
“mutton

33-9.?

-

'

5.0!.

W005

X..3909

did:

9‘ a 001

�m

m.

_

.

i

typo of

'1'th

Psychotherapy

W
mum

t

£10,111th

manhunt:-

mmani

215

Sal-nu

1:3

mm»

36

H1111“.

Baum.

’

;

my. mm

36%

21a:

63;

68

-

.

B

�.113.

7:23;;gt510 frogtysnt Vagiuhlog
a) Soloetton or front-onto than: tultltucionn, taunt

yattoutn 3‘ Ian-13:0: uoapttal rucctvcd sciatic thornpr
than n$ ﬂail-14. or "Ric, (fable

2').

caucnrron£1y a cnnllur

parenting. or the nuaatuucr patttnia vita 013.004 to rocctvlng
payche‘horupyp with a 132:. author (36

Iilica tor-- of treats-at.
was an

£111.14.

lotpttnl - that.

spacial doutcuataon tor Itliou therapies sud pationtn

are 01:13:21.6

:-

rocolvtuc payoho‘hcrapy

Iont also. Iaﬁh pattbnt

psychiatrist for at
nook.

1%

pit cant) rteotving

:-

10.1%

II

n

priusry trout-

tohcdnlod to so. u valid-mt

tar...

ouoohalt hour session: per

2h; pcrooaﬁacc 0: pa‘tou‘o rocotvtnu lunatic thorupy,

at louatuscr natpltnl (3h!) 1. Isgntttcan‘ly 1-3: than n‘
ot‘hor at tho 0th.! in. houpttalu.
lﬁbﬂt patient. ulnacad

II

cahtxophrcntn. thnr. was no

atrrurunoo along houpltalo. for 10.30; a: such pationt' at
each

hospital recoivod notatio for.» of troatnont during

�-13.

It.

hpnplltllsnﬁlon.
1: hated

on $ho

thé
altroroaogu anon:
laltlﬁutloua

dittorlng attitude. lounrdo gallant;

oloacltlod a. puyohonourotlo, bahavlor diaordor sad dcprocnlvn payohoaln.

its turn. llotltutlonl

b)‘a3glgggg_g‘_lglg;§.;§g§§§ggs

«11:09.4 with racy-ct lo pullout'n lcnuth 0:

its:

(2331. IV).

loaning-r Hospital patlualo v.9. hocpltalluod least-t. with
653

a! pntlnnta rounlnlln for witlvu mouth. or loan. cou-

‘1
93304 to 31 par cant
lb. 8111.140 pattcntl and only

5

91-:

cast or £30.. Qt the lhcauohnnottn lontal loalth Ooutnr.
ﬂi- Iodd any of tho
clovgn tenth:

lull-id.

group

II but»: urea

will. two-thirds of the

diachgrsod within

Boston

and

valiant: cor.

.1: tenth: of hoayllalllatlaa.
In cash hospital. tout pntlanta

arc ovqltatod

uﬁ tho

tan. or discharuu ca 'lnprovcd* (tnblo 11).

ll lounlugar loopttal.

havuvur. a blunt: poroautnco (l9!) 0:

pttluutn turn rated II 'Inluprovud* and only a tingle psﬁluat

�.13.
woo

oollod 'sosovosod' or 'sooh ispsovod'. rho hishost

possontoso or “rooovosod' or “soon iopsovod' sstinas (881)
sod tho ioooot provostioo

st

at ‘osiopsovod' (10$)

ooso (bond

Boston.
d) ggg‘ggggg; For

otstistissl ossiysis

throo diogaostis

groupings soso nods: sohioophrouis, ottostivo disosdoss,
sad poyohonoorosis sud porosasiity disssdoss (roblo IV).
tho diocoostio proportions of pstiosts within thoso groups

loss sinilss tor lilisido sad lostoo in that slightly ovor
holt discussod as sshisophssnio sad oppsouiootoiy oso-qoostor
os psychooonrosio or ottootivo disordos.

In sootssst ot

Housings: loopitoi, poyoholsosooio sad possouslity dioosdor

to:

oooooatod

.

ovos

n

1. lo

titty pot
O

0 o

i

coat of tho popslstion.

1

Probl

Vsriols nothodoiosieol problsss vitistod intro-hospital

ototi'otisol sou-potions. lost pro-issue. on tho has of
loosinxtul out-or! ssitorio for subdivision or populstions.

�-m-

ft:

oxaaplc. in ecuparo instituiioau in rpiniiou to Inacth

or hospital Iiay, vuriouu eat-ct: varied: var. iriod uni n03.

it lanaiacar lonvisui.

Clio-04 for coupIr-blo distributioao.

oat-quarto: at tho pationto runaiaod turn:
Ina SII~thrdl taro than tunivo Inathu.

its:

auto: suntan,

it Insoashtlottn

ncnini laaiih easier, in couttuot. 70! at :11 paiioatu ro-

ttinod 103!

ill:

ncvca months, and only 6’

:99. than tapivc

Ionian.
Anothtr aspect

III

tho oouatriotica of tutoroconoity

or the population sulpic. In in. Boston group, tho crucial
rooturoh patient. and th- uonrt roturrais sure hath dnlotod.

in contra-tins tho_1957 and 1959

xiii-id. papuiutioa, II

ob-orvad n uicaitieant accr.ano in

it.

an. o: oomvuinivo ihorapy

its

and an

at pniiulia under tho :3. o: to.

II.

number

a: cit-r patiouta,

inure... in the

coupurnhiiiiy a: as.

group: in tho turn. halpitulo in this I‘Id’ lakes

ihat similar pron-cunt lay

lattes

rumba!

have oocarrod in

it 113.17

in. ﬁre-cat

and lonuiacor populatioan. than ducrcioina

tn. rang.

�.13.,

e: ﬁle diecueetie, treatment
In

verieblee.

end ecneetieuel

elnttleu, Iteeiug tutorletlea

eeelel oleee

an

leﬁerntuetaeqlee e teeter in vitietlng £ntre-heep1te1 eelperteeae with sate variable.
In deteretetux eeetel eleee enere wee tater-eeiee

W
eveileble for 29! e!

petieute. thleeetrteble eeeee

371

occurred where the edncetlen o: the huebend e! e heueea

site

Or

the tether e: e miner

wee

ne‘ reeorded.

alibi: these letheeelegteel ltnttettene.

e number 0:

the latte-heepltel eelperleele rare of eizatfleenee. With

recerd to selection or treetleut. age end

I

eeere were

significantly releted et Healteger Ieepltel (elder
higher

r aom pan-nu

therapy) end 1 Score

wee

were frequently

end

unsung eon“.

releted te zreetnen‘ eeleetion et

I111e14e.
In “eaten-u evaluation.

t. ere an e teatime: tor older

petten‘e te be re‘ed better then younger euee et lilletde'
end Benton; but

at leantncer there

wee en

eppeette trend.

�-15...

with oldcr ptttoato nor. likely $0 be rated tninprovud;

finial: 0: .3.

Loasth n: haupttalllnzttn and tho

causation

III.

loup¢tols

.

rolutod

st

.ai Itll-tdo

tho youugur IB“XCOI oduoatod putts-ta riulntu;

tar tin luacont parted.
that.

dunonatrntod In

in Danica (13b1pa$1sa$s Ind-r

rilntionahipn
1%

bo‘h tho Honnlatcr

un‘

V)

Whiz- such ruluttoanhtpn

two

hoart‘nla,

riot. a. vnttcatl

I

01:11::

it.

trail

070: be. but

13 noted

1&amp;1

a:

as. to taunt: loucor than/n 70.2. 31.11::

It.

for education, and for diacuousl.

30%04

abusinzor noupttcl the poroautaco at pationtn with ﬁho

dinxnoain at ouhtaophrausu.uho wore hoapttalinod ova: an.

yin:

II.

911.

at ltlllld. [capital

laltal luulth cantor 7!.

C...”rablo

V

35‘ and

at luaucshlcotto

�#
.W
IGRPI‘I‘IL

”ﬁll“a; 0: 53!
an.

Mon to

3H!

3'! £63

21! £32

6501!? 8131136 0785

W

.

‘0
.35...“

M

81.

ha

73

36

6

30*”

61

30

6

ho-M

so

to

o

50 o

36

o

o

tan-29

11:

�.17In thin nonpartgon of this. vquatary payhhtntria hocpt‘alc
we have obs-trad significant tu$ar1act1tutzoanl diff-roast. or
puﬁtcu:a tn ‘hc social vurxabznt or want. a: oduaa$1on tad .00131'

.1305, But not .50: a: itaﬁribuﬁinu o: calitoruta r anal. sacral;
Ind ta ouch a! ﬁho irnuIn-n$ variation ~~ duration at haupl‘oltunitaa, noloo‘ton at invaalsl§a and dia‘rtbutaona a: (taunt...
uni dischargu Isuzunttnnt. in. oxpoctn‘ion ﬁhat the institutton
carving «99¢! G1.il pattnuts vault but. the long-at durattou o:
otur: I uschu! pvoporttan a: payuholourotao Gianna... and nor:
ooupluu diagnosﬁﬁc nah-nuts; lunar preporttoa a! patients requiring
organs. turn. or thavnpwa and peasant ditchuruu 1:31:30 use. each
contarlnd. 81-41331!) tho tuctttution serving lav-r clan- putioata
lvtnoad Ibortar purtoda at hocpttnllnutita, 10w proportaaua at
pay-honaurotio cinema-us. and bot‘ar 41:03.13. uvnllaﬁaonl. In
addition, tho diatrihitt-II at r 30.1. scorn. anon; tho that.
hn0p1%aln tollaund tic arising: atllaidc it‘d: in that low accruuurc lost uhnrtn%¢rtnt1u at tho upper :1... group, and high score:
at the lava! 0130-.
1951
mam.
n:
mu»by ropltoaﬁaon 3% Islamic; $ﬂ 1959. a: null no tntvn—tua‘ttuttonal
‘

a. “mg a

«m:- m

am

analysts 5‘ tbs oﬁh'r ﬁn. holpttalo. '0 VII. intuucooutul. It.
‘33. tuttod to anhlcv: a‘a‘tn‘ionl Itgnittonacu. in part huaunuo
at variomy or no‘hodologtcal prohluun. bnﬁ th- trcudu of tho
laﬁa I?! 01-11:: to the ortxtaal study.

.

�.18.
wall- theee etedlee have egeln eupheeleed the rele et

eeeiel tedbre

1n

peyehletrle tees-eat,

we

neat.
have been

lepreeeed by eke letheeelezleel preble-e e: etedleepereee

laeeltetlene. theee leetltelleee

were eeleeted

tee their

edeeetlenel leederehlp end eke expeetetlea thee the recorded

vertehlee would be eleerly defined. our dirtteelelee 1a

errlvtec et eoapereble dete ere invertent euee to the preblee
o: the eeeventlenel eee e: eeeperettve eeetletloe. eepeelelly
treqeene
in the evelietlel e: peyehleerie thereplee. ihe
eee e: dleeherze

retinal, alecueeele eleeeee or length or

heepltelleetlen ee craterle in therapeutic eveluetleue er
ldeatltleetlen
the
e: eeepereblle populetloae ere enhaece

te exceeelve error enleee

eke

tee stainletrettve peteerne.

lnetlteeleee ere eleerly eetehed
The

peredexleel neenre e: e

fellere te eeeeent for tneeltelleeel idleeyaereelee
be eeea 1: e

llterel :nterpretetlee e: the

1e

to

observation or sale

etedy. fhe Reﬁnance! neepllel bee the leet highly trelued

�.19.
par-onuol conducting trontuant thick to applied fur iudtvtda
Optimal port-dd

utlly Outta-a.

ti. 10:33 propnrticn

at tinny in population. with

diagnaaud 1: an unfavorahlo prognostic

grasp (nahtnophron1n1

.

-

and

rut. tn. proportion of ruportod

(ivornblc traatlont rouulta 1. tin recruit.

It

lintll lanlth

10.3%

cantor, 1a contra-t, that.

th-rnpiltn apply trout-nuts tor

its

atlluahunuttu

an administruttvaly

t'utnod

lilatod

potted, to a populntlou with a hithcr pruportton diagnouud
an tahtuophrunta. the propor$1ou or

Ihorco raﬁanaa

:-

than. dhnIrVn$£ann

tarornhlc

III-It: 41--

otgnatto-ntly grants!) 1‘ to yrobnhlo
do not garlogs

%hu%

the thirapoutlo efficacy

a! «a... tnltatuttann. but ludioutnn differ-aces

1n

oritnrtn

or ilprﬂvnncat.

this luck of clarity in

dilanos%1c Ichcuatn and 130.!-

pnrthtlity or pnyuhiatrac truinant 1:31.310: :10. load.
panic tn

tn. attc-ptcd

comparative stanzas 0: psychiatric

tbcrapioa. for tun-win. tho rlIh or roounﬁrntlurcn o:

�.26-

hioleslatl caloutlltl to contlrn obnorvatloaa and. 1: othor
laboratorlou In:

bu as such a

rotlcntlau o: dittoruaec. in

popnlttloau. payehlnlrlo orltarln,'g§g, an fallout.- 1: the

original hapothcuon. the widcaprhad
“cohltophr'uln' or ‘puyahououroslu'

II.
£0

at

Utah

turn. as

caplet. tho

ohnngoa

in payuhdbatonl or blclogluol tosGIrOI with mental 111:...

ha. 1.! to a totals. burdcnod by nasatSVI result: (lullnk).
coat Ijrkad ruouutly in lb. atatlletlng stadium at

taste: in anhinophruals.
physiological

~~

and tho lneonparnblllty

bohuvlornl corrolntlona Icon 1.

(runkuuulnln) and meantiou threshold

tutti.

Sven

I

It'll

at the
t3. Incholyl
turn I

1.111 ohnurvntloa to b. roportod from on. allnlo. in

v. is!-

II‘hOdl twillablo to doccrlba povulctluno adoquntol: lo
provido 1 00.34 ountlrun‘lon?

270: than. obocrvntiaal

at icllavu ao‘,

and concludn

tint lucrtnuoa attention list to

p.16 to the nothodlocloal problana of clnaaltylix substatby

'objoativo' criteria. rcthor thus ta. pro-oat lathe!-

uhlnh,uppo-r to ho so highly dcponloat an inatttutlonnl

�-g1.
:ad ohatrvur nttiiudul, and tho nociepoyuhoiegieul nspuctc or

it.

thorupintapnsiont intcraction.

studio: :13. highlight the situate of changing

!hnuu

populatidns on Iinilnr
mind:

than

italics.

lillnido lbnpitsl

rho peasant

that: rich! soaiopayuholocicai~troatlcat rclntioachipu

it.

1957. rufloo‘inc.

I.

btliovu, a constriction in tho

typo. ﬁt trout-out. and th- .30 runs. at tho patiuntu.

flora in; a nicnitiegnt rnduoiiou in the

inure... in
Icflocting

anon oduontionai iovdi

an 13010... in

noun

use, and as

o: its population,

it. nunbar of aJQIOlotnt and 33.33

aduli patients. baring in. in. yaw! purine, that. can 31.0
a untied voduoiion in tho

incruasc in
czalndnd
was

iii.

it.

nan

u:- o: couvuluivv ihar:py

chain. in the 1957 Itudy, wail.

tho aoliacnt lunatic truatloat or thin study.

at in. pvt-ant study,
and a

z:

at poyuhatropic 4213!. art; ihorupy In.

:- s irontlaat

‘OOOp‘QEQO

and

dittttcat

ii had both a crcntcr

it

it

the

stuff

psychological mooning than can.

vulaivu incrlpr. Ind hearing, parhapc a diff-punt mulbioachip

to attic! variablnn.

its availability at

an

ottoctivcihorupy

�9.2;.

(or viauruua tout tor sinusitiaation) nay liaidbo in.

intin-uco or uoeial «in-I vurinhlcu

lliiin‘ahnad Ina lodiich (bund
clans aad typo a: truttnayt
did for tho oehiuophroaiaa.
317.3

dial-cu, than

in n

rolatittly ottaoiivu,

n0

on

iruatnnut. Etna.

rulntion intros: loci-1

tar attentivt

'fhil

payohoni: but tho:

aﬁccontc that

trail-at mils“.

it,

which

inaxp-nnivu and tachaically

for a

i.

lilplo.

01.0: ditfnruueun nay ho Podtcld, but not niiuiaaﬁod‘.
2:11. that. inter-hospital dittoroncoo 8‘! he loak¢d

initial liliallc inirn-houpitai
‘

um. um peanuts.»

and

It. iatcrauiin DIOOOIIOI
and expectation! of tho

atndy. Xt_io our i-pr03Ii0I.

tron-out

mm “bun-hip.

1.9301: Invited iron

tint:

and

authoriticu

it.

.ttiiudoo

uiilil

0.83

institution.‘ thug. duration or patient tiny. Ginsburg.
rating, type or transient anniniotcrod ind diagnosis are In

�-52..

dutcrltuod an Inch by ‘30 attitude 6! the phyuiotnn and thy

hanpttal niltcn 1a which tho‘pcsinlt rind: hilonlt. a: In:

acuitollntion o: uyupttu or history which in In: pros¢nt.
snob ralntionshapa

ooaditlna

tiara

will he host lurkod in than. psychiatric

that. diagnostic critnrin at. lunn‘

39.01119. 5‘3‘,

tho obaaoQavu «9:53:13 aloostntod with 4300....

hats: arcs-10 inpuirI-nt arc ahacnt,

at

an an achisuphrcuin.

plynhancurolsn, and pcraouazt‘y and bohavior disordcrc.
Vain: conditacnn or anbtcnitr tbs obcurvor'l internal can.

(ntttwudal. alpoctttionl) hood-o
and

by

clansiticatton

hamlet,

(

tic ball. for pyrotptton

). this via:

31.1%: and

1.1!“!

1!:

was

clonrly douonu$rutcd

ﬂair

study of

vandal

in dingao¢1u within a £13315 institution. Th0: dbuurvod

that 1: pnttnuts rials-1: assign-d to ditturoaf lords inns
powulattonl d1! not 6111.: in sang

it Idlllltin, Inrttal

otntnn. vasecttla. as. or contain... stxusftoaa$ 41:211-300.
41¢ occur, hcvcvnr. 1- 13014030. of diagnoses anon;

tItIO

�5""?

mg “m ammuuun- in on an.
u that unman- mo notably at “he.“ in the mmu». I. an.“ they at largely "nuan- of tho “«Nu.

and

uts“: at the Ian-1:0".

�Sociopsychological Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary HoSpitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.
and
Max

From

M.D.

the Department of EXperimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
N.Y.

L.I.,
Aided, in part,
Mental
U.S.

‘Glen Oaks,

Fink,

Health,
Mental Health Board.

by grant MY-2092 of the National Institute of
Public Health Service; and the Nassau County

cosperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully
The

acknowledged.
NOYI

*

Present Address: Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore HOSpital,
NOYO

67,

�Recent community studies have demonstrated

relationship
between social factors and psychiatric treatment. In their study
of the New Haven psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and
Redlich reported significant relationships between an individual's
position in the social class structure and the prevalence of treated

illness, types

a

of diagnosed disorders and kinds and duration of

psychiatric treatment administered (3). The influence of patient
economic status upon the availability of treating personnel, however,
was not excluded in these studies. To test the role of social
factors in the treatment of hospitalized patients independent of
patient's finances and availability of treatments, a survey was
undertaken at Hillside Hospital in 1957. In this hospital, a
variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy and
organic therapies are available to all patients regardless of their

ability to pay.
In the Hillside studies (h,S)

it

that patients
hospitalized for the shortest period were the oldest, had the least
education and were most likely to have been foreign born. The older,
less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive
therapy and received the more favorable discharge ratings. Younger,
native born and more educated patients were hospitalized the longest,
treated primarily by psychotherapy and generally received the poorer
discharge ratings. The clinical factors were also related to a
measure of stereotypy, the California F Scale (1,6). Higher F
scores, i.e., greater stereotypy, were often found in patients
was observed

�-2diagnosed as involutional psychosis

who

were

referred for somatic

therapy, hospitalized for a shorter period, and more often were
rated as much improved or recovered.
Another hypothesis developed at this time was that differences
in various aspects of psychiatric treatment among hospitals should
show the same relationship to social factors as noted within Hillside
Hospital. To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the
procedures of the 195? Hillside study in three institutions -Hillside Hospital, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital of Topeka
and the Massachusetts Mental Health Center of Boston. These institutions were selected with the expectation that they served patients
of different social classes. It was anticipated that in these
hospitals there would be a similarity in attitude towards treatment
and education. Each is a teaching hospital with a full time supervisory staff and active research departments. They emphasize
psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy but provide other treatments such as somatic therapies and active programs of milieu therapy.
Each stresses short-term treatment of voluntary patients and does
not provide custodial care.
The specific aims of this study were to determine the population
characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social
class, age, education and F score: and to relate these characteristics
to the treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the institutions.

�-3METHOD

these
in
residence
in
adult
patients
census of all voluntary,
and
Menninger
While
1959.
institutions was undertaken in January,
of
number
small
a
only,
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients
(MMHC)
assigned
were
Center
Health
Mental
those at the Massachusetts
chronic
a
of
members
Or
were
by the courts for psychiatric evaluation
a
for
specific
transferred
group
schizophrenic state hospital
from
the
study
excluded
These
were
research project.
patients
A

the

patient
because of their non-voluntary status.
the
months
later
F
Eighteen
California scale on the census day.
social
the
determine
to
examined
were
records of discharged patients
and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of social class,
Each

was given

and
education
of
score
the Hollingshead 2-factor index - weighted
173
of
consisted
The
study population
occupation - was used (2).
95
Massachusetts
the
and
at
100
Menninger
at
patients at Hillside,
a

Mental Health Center.

social
the
of
of
the
relations
examination
included
study
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as
The

between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult

however,

These
below.
discussed
differences
because of various methodological
and
comparisons,
marked
the
most
in
intrahospital
difficulties were
will
emphasis
variables
of
the
in
analyses
psychiatric
accordingly,
be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
to
missing
led
also
These
difficulties
trends.
intrainstitutiOnal
information for some data, which is reflected in the varying
population sample sizes in the tables.

�RESULTS

A.

Inter-hosEital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems

institution, the

reporting studies
ignored
and
either
granted
for
taken
is
of
the
hospital
structure
institution
a
strange
studying
in
or mentioned briefly. However,
the
of
made
aware
is
one
data
comparable
and attempting to gather
these
selected
we
While
institutions.
between
differences
many
pro—
treatment
and
research
teaching,
in
comparable
as
institutions
wh
ways
in
structurally
unlike
were
they
found
that
we
grams,
in
noted
were
problems
Sp‘cific
the
of
study.
influenced the data
the
and
classes
diagnostic
of
treatment,
of
type
the designation
outcome.
treatment
of
evaluation
desigfor
The
criteria
8) Designation of 212s of Treatment:
the
among
differed
"psychotherapy"
received
a
nating that patient
When

from a home

difficult.
classification
in
uniformity
institutions, making
treatment
as
designated
was
At Menninger Heepital psychotherapy
for
a
psychiatrist
staff
by
basis
a
on
prescription
administered
the
psychiatric
with
Sessions
a
fee.
which the¢patient was charged
care.
patient
administrative
of
routine
considered
part
were
resident
treatment
as
defined
was
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy
did
Staff
psychiatrists
resident.
sessions with the psychiatric
to
supervising
activities
their
not treat patients, but restricted
charged.
were
fees
No
additional
the resident physicians.

�-5At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was

designated as a function of many disciplines -- psychiatric residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident in charge of each case.
b) Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles made
comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed the
multiple evaluative data scheme recommended by the American PsychiaMMHC
and
both
while
followed unitary
Association
Hillside
tric
systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed
in Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable
to that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortion.

c) Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Ratings of improvement at

the three hospitals varied in format and detail.
rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with

discharge
separate evalua-

The

a

tion for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside
Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global ratings
making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor of the
Menninger system (Table II). For this study-tho Meaninger syndrome

�rating

was c

Sociopsychological Variables
age,
of
social
class,
variables
the
of
The distribution
institutions
three
the
among
F
Scale
score
and
California
education
2.

is presented in Table III.

M

social
the
in
difference
a) Social Class:
Hospital
Menninger
At
institutions.
three
the
of
class composition
Hospital,
Hillside
at
class;
upper
predominantly
was
the population
There was a marked

predominantly
Center,
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
and
at
middle class;
lower class.

b) Age:

There were no differences in age

institutional populations.

distribution in the

attaineducational
in
differed
0) Education: The populations
Menninger
at
education
of
more
years
having
with
patients
ment,
hl
While
per
Center.
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
than
at
Hospital
32
only
school,
high
MMHC
completed
not
had
Cent of the patients at
not
Menninger
graduate.
did
cent
at
23
and
per
Hillside
at
cent
per
of
distribution
the
in
differences
F
Score: Significant
d)
cent
per
Fifty-one
observed.
F
were
Scale
California
the
scores on

�-7cent
and
eight
per
only
below
30,
scores

of Menninger patients had
associated
F
being
scores
with scores of 50 or above -- the higher
thirtyHillside
at
In
contrast,
with higher degrees of stereotypy.
MMHC
while
at
30
below
F
had
scores
one per cent of the patients
F

30.
below
were
cent
only twenty per
the
of
class
social
the
in
differences
Thus, the anticipated
These
differScale.
educational attainment and performance
of
relation
the
concerning
the
hypothesis
testing
permit
ences
insti—
the
among
variables
treatment
the
to
factors
sociopsychological
on

the

F

tutions.
3.

Variables
Treatment
Psychiatric
Among
Treatment:
of
a) Selection

institutions, significant-

therapy
somatic
received
Hospital
Menninger
at
fewer
patients
ly
IV.
Table
shown
in
MMHC
(68%)
as
than at Hillside (6h%) or
differed
The
institutions
three
b) Duration of Hospitalization:
IV).
(Table
of
stay
markedly with respect to patient's length
longest,
hospitalized
were
Menninger Hospital patients
cent
31
to
compared
per
months
or
more,
twelve
for
remaining
patients
the
of
those
at
5
cent
of the Hillside patients and only per
Hillside
the
of
modal
The
stay
Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
the
of
two-thirds
while
months
was between seven and eleven
(h3%)

group

of
months
hospitalization.
six
within
MMHC patients were discharged
were
most
patients
each
In
hospital,
c) Discharge Evaluation:
At
IV).
(Table
“improved“
evaluated at the time of discharge as

�-3(19%)
of
patients
percentage
a
higher
Menninger Hospital, however,
called
was
patient
a
single
and
only
were rated as "unimproved"
"recovered"
of
The
percentage
highest
"recovered" or "much improved".
of
lowest
proportion
and
the
(28%)
"much
ratings
improved"
or
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
the
"unimproved" (10%) were found at

Center.

groupdiagnostic
three
analysis
d) Diagnosis: For statistical
and
psychodisorders,
affective
ings were made: schizophrenia,
The
diagnostic
IV).
(Table
disorders
neurosis and personality
Hillside
for
similar
were
these
groups
within
of
patients
proportions
schizophrenia
as
diagnosed
were
and MMHC in that slightly over half
disorder.
affective
or
psychoneurosis
as
one-quarter
and approximately
and
personality
psychoneurosis
Hospital
In contrast, at Menninger
the
of
population.
cent
than
per
fifty
disorder accounted for more

B.

Intra-Hospital Comparisons

Problems
Methodological
l.
by
limited
were
comparisons
The intra—hospital statistical
lack
the
was
Most
prominent
problems.
methodological
of
a variety
of
subdivision
the
for
criteria
cut-off
statistical
of meaningful
within
the
of
population
due to the homogeneity

populations, in part

analyses
the
In
statistical
size.
each institution and to the sample
had
which
obtained
were
cells
several
within a single institution

�-9-

either none or fewer than five cases, thus not permitting a satisfactory intrahospital test of the hypothesis.
2. Intra-Hospital Comparison
With this methodological limitation some trends similar to
that found in the earlier study were observed, although few were of
statistical significance. With regard to selection of treatment,
for example, age and F score were found related at Menninger Hospital
(older and higher F score patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at
both the Menninger and Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients
remaining for the longest period. While such relationships were
trend
two
a
in
these
was noted at the
significant
hospitals, similar
MMHC (Table V) where no
patients over ho, but lb% of patients under
the age of

20 remained

longer than

a

year.

-—-_-------

�-10..
DISCUSSION
we
hospitals
psychiatric
of
voluntary
three
In this comparison
of
differences
patients
interinstitutional
have observed significant
but
and
social
of
education
class,
of
in the social variables
years
of
each
and
F
in
Scale
scores;
not age: in distribution of California

hospitalization, selection

of

the treatment variables
treatments and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluatimﬁh
The expectation that the institution serving upper class patient!
would have the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of
psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata,10W6r
proportion of patients receiving organic forms of therapy, aM'poorest discharge ratings were each confirmed. Similarly, the ﬂﬁtitution
serving lower class patients evinced shorter periods of howitaliza—
disand
betwr
low
of
diagnoses,
psychoneurotic
proportions
tion,
charge evaluations.
It is our impression that these differences in psycuatric
treatment are more related to differences in staff attitﬂes than to
differences in population samples. The contrasts betweeninstituthccomplexity.
tions in duration of hospitalization are great, as are
of diagnostic formulations, discharge evaluations, definiﬁons of
details
and amount of recorded data These
and
the
psychotherapy,
stylistic differences cannot be dismissed as merely idiosywratic
since they follow a pattern related to social differences mnsistent
with previous findings.
—-

duration of

�-11-

treatment variable relationships appear to
be interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff as by the constellation of
Such population and

history which a patient may present. Such relationships
will be most marked in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 343., where the objective criteria
symptoms or

defining diseases of known organic impairment are absent, as in
schizophrenia, psychoneurosis and personality and behavior disorders.
Under conditions of perceptual or situational ambiguity the observer's
attitudes and expectations become the basis for perception and classi-

fication. This

clearly demonstrated by Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (7} in their study of variations in diagnosis within a
single institution. They observed that patients randomly assigned
to different wards did not differ in type of admission, marital
status, education, age or residence. Significant differences did
view was

occur, however, in diagnoses among the three wards and among three
administrators on one ward. As it is highly unlikely that these

differences were inherent in the population, we believe they are
reflections
of the attitudes of the examiners.
largely
It is clear that many of the present psychiatric concepts of
diagnosis or clinical evaluation have relatively little meaning when
transferred from one institution to another. If these concepts are

taken

literally

the results become paradoxical. For example,
Menninger Hospital has the most highly trained personnel conducting

treatment, keeps its patients for the longest time and has fewest

�-12-

patients diagnosed as schizophrenia.

And

yet, despite these resources

At
treatment
results.
the
poorest
and favorable factors, it reports
MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a therapist,
which keeps patients for the shortest periods, and which has a higher
the
reported
classed
asschizophrenia,
of
the
population
proportion

treatment results are the best.
the
does
relative
not
reflect
study
this
that
probable
is
It
Our
no
furnishes
data
of
the
institutions.
therapeutic efficacy
the
which
provides
hospital
for
determining
independent criteria
better care; nor for assessing the comparability of the population
the
based
on
evaluations
the
Since
are
of
the
in
degree
illness.
institution‘s own ratings, we believe that the differences reflect
variations in the criteria used for evaluation of improvement rather
than any intrinsic psychiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study (5) it Was postulated that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons of different

social background. It was suggested that the higher the person's
has
This
employed.
the
complex
the
criteria
more
social background
Manninger‘s
using
with
the
confirmed
study,
in
been literally
present
two
other
of
the
the
global rating
a tripartite rating compared to
which
our
on
Even
syndrome
the
rating
considering
institutions.
contention
our
is
were
based,
it
analysis
comparative statistical
in
improvement
to
we
assess
lower
apt
class
are
that for
persons
work,
resume
to
capacity
the
symptom
patient's
relief or
relation to
while for upper class persons the criteria stress such complex

�-13-

intangibles as "developing insight", or "working through one's problems."

investigations have again demonstrated the role of
social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been considerably
impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational leader—
ship and the expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly
defined. But the differences in institutional style making it diffi—
cult to obtain comparable data are important cues to the problem of
the conventional use of comparative statistics, especially in the
evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of discharge ratings,
diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria
in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable
populations are subject to considerable error unless the institutions
are clearly matched for social class patterns in patient population
and for staff attitudes and style. These difficulties may also extend
to the failures of scientists to confirm observations made in other
laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may be as much a reflection
of differences in populations and psychiatric criteria as to errors in
the original hypotheses. The wideSpread use of such terms as "schizoWhile these

phrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore the changes in psychological
or biological features with mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative results. Even were a valid observation to be

laboratory, we do not have methods available to
describe populations adequately to provide a sound confirmation.

reported from one

�~1h-

Increased attention

classifying subjects

must be paid to the methodological problems of

criteria rather than the present
and
on
institutional
dependent
highly

by "objective"

methods which appear to be so
of
the
and
aspects
the
sociopsychological
observer attitudes

pist-patient interaction.

thera-

�-15..

SUMMARY

and

CONCLUSION

hospitals,
variables.
treatment
to
related
were
characteristics
population
F
and
education
score,
social
by
defined
age,
class,
were
Populations
and were related to type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diagnosis and discharge evaluation.
in
observed
were
differences
2. Significant interinstitutional
and
education
of
characteristics of patient social class, years
F
of
California
scores, but not age.
distribution
3. The variations in treatment characteristics among instituthe
in
predicted
different
be
found
to
significantly
tions were
direction.
a
follow
pattern
practices
in
psychiatric
h. These variations
and
are
institutions
among
differences
class
with
social
consistent
not regarded as being idiosyncratic.
of
make
comparisons
S. The differences in institutional style
between
results
and
treatment
diagnoses, duration of hospitalization,
need
more
objective
for
and
the
and
tenuous,
institutions difficult
emphasized.
is
of
populations
of
classification
criteria
1.

In three psychotherapantic-oriented teaching

�REFERENCES

l.

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,
&amp;
New
York, Harper
Brotherg
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,

1950.
2.

Hollingshead, A.B.:

Two-Factor Index of Social Position, mimeo-

graphed publication.
3.

Mental
and
Class
Social
F.C.:
Redlich,
&amp; Sons, Inc.,
New
John
Wiley
York,
Community Study,

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

1958.

h.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

1957.
216-228,
g:
2.,
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental HOSpital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,

Ho

5.

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
6.

l:

565-57h, 1959.

(CaliM.:
M.
Attitude
Social
and
Fink,
Pollack,
R.L.,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
Dis.,
J.
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
Scale)
fornia

Kahn,

130: 187-192, 1960.
7.

OrientaM.:
and
Psychiatric
S.
Lefton,
Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,
Mental
a
in
and
Treatment
to
Diagnosis
tion and Its Relation

Heapital,

Amer.

J. Psychiat.,

116: 127-132, 1959.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Impr oved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly
WW-

Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

~———-————-—-———

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

III

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Interhosgital

Menninger

Hospital

'

Hillside
Hospital

t
I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

!

i

t

t

Social

Class

EIII

%

17

3h

13

i
g

§

IV
v

1

E

t

28

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
gMenninger Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health

{Hospital

Psychotherapy
Somatic

of
Treatment

Type

68

Other

8

1

.

as”ii.ii.ii_wmm.mi“iiiiiiiiii.i,__
Duration of

Hospitalization

i:QﬁiéimﬁifAL_R$;991MW_WWWW“a.

_-._~

_-_rmi...._i__.mwt

7-11 months
1

months

“—W.W
-

came-u «rr

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

61

Improved

10

'Unimproved
I
..

,

m

Discharge
Diagnosis

..—W_-»lnw

w-‘W

a

.

df=h§ B&lt;.OOl.~W___
y3é29.3;
.....

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis

_

“p

M
1?

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

x2=23-83 df‘h? P&lt;-001

29

*__,m_.__".

�TABLE V

Duration of Hosgitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

i»
mm

Below 20

Menninger

Hillside

81
73

61

3O

30

20

2422219.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

‘Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

AlcoholiSm

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�.0".

m
an.»
"mm
”turn
M
m
«trauma

in

a

Want a mu “am“.

m.

to

m:

Imitation

mums It“ ”'01:“!
M vacuum m «an.» mun. ”human
to
87
Nil
“mam"
it.
”no: u
pmuul. «Wu!
03
and
”I.
«um.
”mun- ti. mama" um: 53 by
m “Multan” at mm «- mm: It!“ t ”mm
V111
in
mu
”amt.
autumn»
h
It“
mm
m
than panama-u man: “an “uncut: ”turn um
to.“ ”am... m3", than an aunt“. cum-u «nun
or
um
has.
hum-at
that. u u
ﬁlm
or“.
and
a“
ammo-u.
mu»
m1“:
as
stadium
yum-pun 3: citation!
damn. an.
and
autumn“:
an
”um.- «yuan-n “cm
man»
a» tub for put-pun at elm-usual». Mt now an

mm“

nun-1: 4mm»: by
may “My of

munch, an»

and

um m u

31331.
a
mm:
«was:
nub
mum
“tin. not when“ an ”that! "m1: yuan-d u
01’
did
in
I!!!“
{taunt
at mm m: Quintin, m1“:
hum, man, In mm. suntan» «um»...
um um, bum. in “an.“
th- an. may «.4

in

oz»

m
u “9&amp;3“le
m‘thMMumui-d.
likely an. m aﬂm m “burnt a. 53W“...
in

�7C:

1/4,,

:

WW—
001.23]!”L”

g/
J
I:

’1

1,

5

6
7

/

.
i

.

My
I
i

"

.1

16'

1

1.!
1,

u
hi

101

o1

o

o

O.

o

()1

2

.101

1._

ﬂ

16

I ll

91

I"

1

1

°

'

“-3.

Rejec’t'

“1

ram

13

0

~

1

o

7

11

3

°

°

9

11

O1

1

ll]

o

57

-

70
7

8

001.23/3

35

&gt;

li

$7,

2312
Col.

1

‘1

IJ"

|

1

7/01.}

TALLY SHEEP

601.26/1 ‘7
,..,2

Deckf

-

D11

1

0

1

1

‘

0

.

/

9 4

.

75"

0011.29/8,9. {Mama

1%‘5‘5
I!
I

2

391

3

5

1h

0

o

Reject

O

5‘3

20111.11

X
11601.26/1

//

2

3

_

—

0.

Asa

.0

as:

1

111:

1

1

1

35‘

115

a

-

r

16
-

_

o

1

W—‘i—
01.1
Re

I

.9.—
1.

9‘

11

.3-

" M-w—«eﬁm
0
H

ect

1mm.

01

77

1

55

“_~_
53

f

�Dock:

I
,

“BALL!

Qilvcéév

31‘

comes/1

.

,

2

a?”

sum
sol-23k

,Gol.23/1

”

_

001-23/3

17

3

O

l

20

6

.

O

,

O

mutt»

‘00“

6

3

o

3

3

O

33

3

o

Reject
ICE“.

7

O

3--

o

�f

x

7“

,/;.!,/,

ﬂ

_

TALLY SHEEP

g/

001.2611 ‘7

57‘7“.”—

'

001,237.! 7‘1"" 1"
a

!

'i

,

/’

,

16

h ’* J

5

u

ﬂ

7

,.

.

”J--.

.,

x

.

.

o.

V-

o

.

o

2

~_

-

V

0

.

7.1.07

,

0

_-.

J

‘1‘

36

7

,

0

a

“I,

74.,47445
Co1.23/3
‘

7

,.

Q-

.

V

I

5

7

35"“!
7,001.23/2'

1...,_ 27 .

J

ﬁYlI ‘,

2

" bro"

Decks"

I

16

,

i

t.

..

.

.

-

57

.

.

0

0

,

-

13.
O

I

[4'
7

7
II

8
9.

7-07

ll

l

V

0

I.

iii

Owﬁl"
Reject H
warm.

”

“I":
aﬁa’
..

‘

,

,

.

I

V.

O

0.

II.

3

0

O

~

A

-

D

_

..

~ -

,

.

O

,

,

.

-

H

4
’9.

{IV/J '11.: farm/1:22.—
,

,

,

,

.16.

,

9

69.19.2311...

-

.

2

.39.-.

3

S

- -h-

.0

o

Reject

MAL
X

5‘3

//

2

not“

-

.3

-

.0

V

J.»

V.

5

.

.35‘

-

0

8'

7
‘

C?

.o

.

m____9__
0
f

_.

-

Reﬂect
-

__

.

.

43

,a

.0

_._V

.,

3

,

O

A

-601026/1

-

limo),

001.29/8,9.

Duh“

-

,,

55

.9—
.V

9‘ -

..
,3-

«wag—m...
53

/

�-3Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of

patients
called

rated as "unimproved" and only a single patient was
"recovered" or "much improved". The highest percentage of "recovered"
or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the lowest proportion of
"unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health

were

Center.
d) Diagnosis:

For

statistical analysis three diagnostic

groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic
proportions of patients within these groups were similar for Hillside

in that slightly over half were diagnosed as schizophrenia
and approximately one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective disorder.
In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and personality
disorder accounted for more than fifty per cent of the population.
and

MMHC

-‘---------’
Table
B.

Intra-Hospital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems
The

a

IV

intra-hospital statistical comparisons

variety of methodological problems.

of meaningful

statistical

cut—off

were

limited by

Most prominent was the lack

criteria for the subdivision

of

populations, in part due to the homogeneity of the population within
each institution and to the sample size. In the statistical analyses
within a single institution several cells were obtained which had

�Page 5.
COMMENTS BY

PSYCHIATRISTS

Most of the unfavorable

(1)
(2)
more

insufficient
"

criticism can

number of
"
"

be divided

into

two

complaints:

sessions per patient paid for by Project

patients

point, many apparently feel the Project should advertise itself
to its eligible subscribers, reminding them of the availability of coverage.

0n the second

Favorable criticism was in general directed at expressing approval of the
idea of testing psychiatric insurance. There were in addition a surprising number
of complimentary remarks about the planning or administration of the Project.

SUMMARY

typical participating psychiatrist is a man between 35 and 50, practicing
in Manhattan. He treats patients in the hospital as well as in his private office,
and he also does some clinic work. He has his "Boards" in psychiatry. His usual
office fee is $20 or $25.
His primary orientation in his practice is analytical and psychological. This
does not preclude his prescribing drugs or shock therapy.
The

interest in the Project is demonstrated by the fact of his participation.
If he has some adverse criticism, it is apt to be directed at the number of sessions allowed, which he regards as insufficient, or at the small number of patients
who have sought care, which he regards as a reflection of an inadequate educational
program. In short, his criticism is generated by his tendency to view the Project
as a social rather than an insurance experiment. He feels the Project, Operating
in an area where the supply of private psychiatric time apparently exceeds the
demand, is in a unique position to promote more psychiatry for more people, which
is what he really wants - insurance or no.
His

APA-NAMH-GHI RESEARCH PROJECT

August 30, 1960

�MWQQIPWZMMMWMS.

mmuummmumuaumm
umm-mmmyutnwmuum

mmmummmammw

«mummy-"um.

mmumtmmmuwm
mmnm.mumn
nun-1 mm m "WW nu»
M
m

mnﬂMmMWmuumu-m

ml;

Wax.

m-

1:

m», W‘s:

”.mtunmwmmtm.mm

Mnmw‘um.

mam.

uanwmmum.nm

��~19.

tut Oil. innﬁltution urn vniulruhla ‘u individual dittorunaai
among

uxaainera.)
uwdﬂﬂﬂh‘b an“ “it

Tabla

ﬁttings at inﬁrOth
neat variad in tornat uad antltl.
MIR

#3:

triptrtit¢

Yb: diaahtrmc

with a toynrtta cvtlnntion

aburnctaralugi¢nl and buhnvtoral changnt.

it wan dattianlt

tar

rating at
toc&amp;31,

3R and name had

cltbnl ratings in

which

tribution at

taator a: th‘ ﬂdngiaaar ﬁrst.» (tabla II).

Glen

ﬁn

sauna: the

awnw

In? than atndy tbs ntnuingar Iyndroun rnﬁang was nuad for par»
paamt

a: uauptrinun.
fable
.U.-”Q””Wﬁ&amp;u

2. ageia a anal» {at} virinblas
3)

ﬂow

n1 Elana:

that:

was

t

mnrkoé

airturanco in thu

�~16»

cahisaphrtnta) raeqivaa dtluhirnt rgtiuam at unimprﬁvud
lawn

titan than puttuai: ricosvtn:

Iﬁ ﬂurn‘icn

ox

payihnthnrupy ulﬁuc.

h3upitn11:ut£on. putiantu rtaaivinc uamnatn

ihhruyr warn hacpttalitod tar 1011:: partndi

ﬁhnn

that.

rtontvinc othtr ﬁhirapiau‘
canatdcrubiu alts-rw

Catt. at».

ﬁhtﬁ‘hOQwﬁﬂﬁ

the thrnu inasitutlunu with r¢nvact

in putsuut’u Ina‘th u! Uta: (Tibia VI). urn pattnaia
houyltulinud tonguut. with éﬁﬁ

tuttvt

unathn

aw

aura, casparnd

pniaautn and «n1: 5 pi! aunt

tiny at an.

a: pattoutl

t;

ramuiuing (or

3: par can‘ at th¢ an

at ihiiﬁ at Inna. 2k: unﬁt!

an group an: autumn»

Ii?in

whit. twanthirdl of thc vane pattcntn

'18 ninth!

wuru

and GllVIh

ninth:

worn «inahavcud within

I! httpttﬂliﬁitﬁlnw

&amp;i K?! :nd an

lli

«at tho inuial‘r:otor utus elatily

vtlntta ‘0 luacth or haunt‘nltuatiol
rtuuiainc tar sh. toauaut purine;

It

..

ﬁa‘iouiu
yuingar

ovary use lcvut,

�I.
Winn

ttruaiurc at thu hmnpt‘nl
isnuvud

a...
is ﬂak.» It! uranﬁtd.

rcpar‘tu; itudtin Iran a

ii

nautxuaua

in¢titutiau

1h» autumn

brlitxv. ﬁnntvnr,

and I3QOHﬁﬂiﬁi

and: aunrt a:

ﬁnd

inntitutaun.
“ad

tam

titan!

3n studying a atwtnun

ta cutuar nanpnrahia data an.

an

nun: dirzurananu butwaﬁn instituhtaaa.

a! an. gutpxtnl argumiustzan

twanmnn «no

a: sh:

naihudoiiuin prdhlqua ﬁrtuoiana trnaiucntﬁ tar nuanpln,
bath

tit

auaa and urn

mat. At suns tun

at

hiVO day

an

«at:

it:

hacpital,

and 1a ‘hc nttar~¢uru

Iu.nauh a ti‘ﬁlﬁﬁ. ht as; tau! Iran in diﬂﬂhlrsi

sh: Fattunt {run

8%.

hllﬂhﬂl ﬁt an chatter unﬁt, Running

£hat to «111 with; be ramrauathiu
wharcat

unlit, ﬂﬁill

ttu.i£nc phyciatmu a‘n «at. far I yutxdat

an innpattcut, an 933

n11»&amp;a.

haugﬁ‘al

at an. dtﬂahnrca

dun‘nr r01&amp;t10n;&amp;19.

manna

tar hi; putaont‘n,nnr¢;

turuaunstan_¢£ shat pn‘iuntn

�dc»
cu
hon,
a'mu
wanted
an
my
mm.
min»
pun-sonata
on ohm“ u «a.

�£03"

£in
2:?

artootod the colltction and organisttton 0: ‘ho dutn.\ﬁﬁQﬁgﬁ~
Spacitic problcnn were uotnd 1n dociguntiano a: typo or

1

L}!

7p”;

011/”

'rﬂt

“’

Wm Mt

qﬂ’

U

9/

ﬂ:;;pg{§‘
W

54?”

Vlﬂ”

//

‘

\
Q

”uncut, (lunatic tom
antenna

and

«autumn: train.“

a) Dootgnntion or 322. o: rrcttntut: rho criterig tor
dalignntin; that n patioat rocutvad 'puyohathtrtpy' dartorod
Ilbﬁﬂ tho instituttoal, ﬁshing unttornity in claalttienttun

difficult.

At HIE payohothorupy can designated as

ilturod

trc;;noat

ndm1n~

procertpttan btllu by a otntt paychiutrict,
for which tun pationt wan chargcd t I... Stadium. wi‘h
in. puychtatrie rolid¢at wort Ionatdorod part of routtuo
Idninistrntivu patina: cure.
xx
it paythothorapy val defined at transient nautical
with thu psychiatric recidont. Stat: paychintrista did not
trutt paticnta, but rtatriétcd thotr no£1v1ttul to auporvtstac
tht ruaidcat physicianl.
At the lane psychathornpy was donixnttod u. 1 function
0! many disciplinol .. pljchlltrie runtdontl, pnyoholoututo.
loclnl nurture, nurses and :ndtc;1 studonta. Furnnl record:
or Inch caution. var. not routincly includnd 1n the pt‘tcnt'c
rcoord and to ‘lccrtuin which pationtc rcccivcd psychotherapy,
the resident 1n «Egret or ouch ctno van intervicwed.
b) an noun Individual Institution}. Guano-tn
Itylou Illa and. saupnriaona difficult. At urn dilohurco
on a

�Wmuummﬁmwmmummm.
wmmmmmummm.nuﬂ$d
Mmrwhﬂwmgwm.mwnmmt
ummmmmmmswmwmamwm
watchmen.

mwmammm’m'm

Wammmuwm.
: nmmm,mmm
a)

'

m

mWﬁWﬂmﬂWu”W’M-ﬂ).
mmtuWﬂmvtnmp-mmmm
’W‘wmmﬂ“. ‘mwma*m'
&gt;

M

mmw‘m(ﬂ)mme-ww*
(M)mmummmmum.
‘

’

a)

mammummm.mm

«Mammary WWW“
mummmmwmmwmu

�H.

v.

vw&lt;_~——va‘

&lt;vwvwv

ﬂw—w—v__ﬁ,

_.

mum

mmewWa-ww

,‘
mumwmarmmmm.
MMWmmmmmu-nmum

mmmmmmhmm
mwummmmxtmwmmh"
m

Mum,wuwmwmw~.

mummwumwwhn

“mammary“. mwmamm‘
y‘auquuwnv’wu‘ummwnm
muwmvmmmmmmmm
(nJNMummwn-uunmm ”mu
mmuuWMwW,ubmm

�.5.

pm»

amu-

mm“... mamas mun: “was“ and

nttivo yrucrtnt a: asliam thirnpy. Inch ntronsut tutti»

tits

tr‘atmuut a: mutuntary'p;taontu, 400i nut privtda auto

twain! aura «an iduda ‘0 ﬁrdw

staliar tea

1%:

pntiiat4pavu1$tian tram

arouwu.

ﬁn: primary r‘acan Iv? nﬁluatiux thy inntatatxtnc.
haumvur,

In:

1» Sb.

«spautntian ﬁhut hair vuuxa nurvu p‘ttoaaa

at ﬁiztarina loaiai GIIIIIG (an. 5;) «at that aattivuuaau

tut:

ﬁsmanaxau

1a

ﬂthlé ha rﬁtioaiaﬂ in ﬂat ﬁraainant vattdbinu.

2h: upauixia purpaua a! ths‘ mind: in; te doﬁtruinu‘popamaa

m3:
m
mutwm
um»
an autumn ”hm m»

it

Ulﬁlﬂl mind», «an, aduauiiun and

thaag pniiaas charaatnrxatauu

ﬁt

it

r

ﬁt:

accru. ﬁnd to rulu‘u

zr*u®auut Virtublun

at

a: «ﬁtment, amiss.” a: mp-zuuumm, Manna: “a"

¢&amp;uuhnrss-nvn!u:stan.

�W1
01“.

m

1.
a.

~

31!
51

,

E

J.

17

t
am

20

h.

3.

SI:

13

38

29

5

38

3”

15$

5?

so

53

:1

23

33

413

I)!

32‘

515

18-915

53

51

M

16 0

23

1?

10

10—29

51$

M9

”S

M

In.

50

38

5&amp;1“?

a

18

ha

195

£21!

fan

i

'

5.

of
“ICON.“

80

;

.&gt;

u-

5

M3!

E
ﬂ

m”

he

4,

~

'

:'*13I:§
‘

«a
9".”‘
1“

31-3

9

”‘03::

at"

.1

it'We”

it”$001

“it" 90.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2904">
                <text>Social aspects of psychiatric treatment in three hospitals: methodological problems. VA Cooperative Studies in Psychiatry, 6:202-6.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2905">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2906">
                <text>mfp-02-01-004-59-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2907">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2908">
                <text>Pollack, Max; Siegel, Nathaniel; Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2909">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2910">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2911">
                <text>9 items. 1: Photocopy of publication with Q &amp; A. 2: [preprint]. 3: Draft. 4: The Identification of Patient Populations: Comparability of Subjects in Evaluating Therapies Among Institutions by Max Fink, M.D. 5: The American Psychoanalytic Association Summary and FInal Report of Central Fact-Gathering Committee. 6: Correspondence. 7: Handwritten notes. 8: Social Class. Diagnosis, and treatment In Three Psychiatric Hospitals. 9: Research, drafts, and letters.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2912">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2913">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74493">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81054">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87615">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94176">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="278" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="69">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/d30b69ef69a8cf00c194481df0db03be.pdf</src>
        <authentication>468179c0544d033b07449c4407b71b92</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100695">
                    <text>Reprinted from THE

JOURNAL OF

Volume

130,

NERvots

AND MENTAL

DIsEAsE

No. 3, March 1960

Printed in (ISA.

SOCIAL ATTITUDE (CALIFORNIA F SCALE)
AND CONVULSIVE THERAPY
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,1 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.

.

,\—

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

improved was most likely in those who were

Studies of the mode of action of convulsive
therapy in altering behavior have been under
investigation by a variety of experimental
methods in our laboratory for several years.
Early studies demonstrated a relationship
between clinical evaluations of improvement
and the degree of altered brain function as
measured by the amobarbital test (15) and
the electroencephalogram (5). Personality
patterns related to a favorable therapeutic
outcome have been deﬁned by family interviews (13) and projective techniques (14).
Behavioral changes have been measured by
complex visual and tactile perceptual tasks
(6) and by analyses of changes in syntactical
aspects of language (12).
More recently we have become increasingly aware of the relation of sociopsycho—
logical factors to differences in both referral
for, and response to, convulsive therapy. In
a study of the entire adult iii-patient population of Hillside Hospital it was found that
those patients referred for convulsive therapy were signiﬁcantly older, more likely to
have been foreign-born, had less education
and higher scores on the California F Scale
than those patients who received psychotherapy alone (17). Of those patients receiving convulsive therapy, a favorable therapeutic evaluation of recovered or much

older, more poorly educated, foreign—born
and with higher F scores (18).
The aim of the present investigations was
to study the convulsive therapy process further by the use of the California F Scale (1).
Although promulgated in a setting where
interest was focused on prejudice and au—
thoritarianism, the F Scale was designed to
evaluate psychological aspects, such as con—
ventionalism, rigidity and stereotypy, related to the manifestation of these social

attitudes.

It was our

speciﬁc purpose to determine:
1) what the F Scale measures in a psychiatric
population, and 2) how response to the F
Scale varies with change in brain function.
METHOD

Population: These studies have been conducted at Hillside Hospital, a private, nonproﬁt 200-bed psychiatric hospital in New
York City admitting voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental illness.” Psychoanalytically—oriented psychotherapy is the
treatment of choice for all patients, with
somatic therapies (convulsive, insulin coma
and drug therapies) regarded as ancillary,
but available when needed. The in—patient
population consists mainly of middle-class
Jewish patients, with a high school education. between the ages of 18 and 40. Most
patients are classiﬁed into the diagnostic
categories of schizophrenia, psychoneurosis,
manic-depressive and involutional psychosis.
In these studies we have used a ten-item
modiﬁcation of the standard F Scale (8).

Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New York.
This investigation was supported in part by grants
M-927 and MYw2092 from the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U. S.
Public Health Service. This paper derives from a
presentation given at the Annual Meeting of the
Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia,
1

April, 1958.

187

�188

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

TABLE 1
Scores on Conventional and “Reverse” F Scales
Dichoto—

(grilled
I‘OU p S

M

chzi:

iN

Cpnv erll—
iona
Scale

hi3:

‘Reverse”'

_

Diff.

t

51.5
48.1

+25.2
+0.7

20.3*

:
Scale

I

10—37
38—70
*

79'
Signiﬁcanti
_

at

.001

0.6

level

The procedure consists of having the subject
read ten statements and indicating to what
extent he agrees or disagrees with each, i.e.
a little, pretty much, or very much. The
score for each item ranges from one to seven,
and the total score range is 10 to 70, with
high scores indicating greater agreement
with the statements. The statements are
extreme, uncritical or stereotyped expres—
sions, such as: “No sane, normal, decent
person would ever think of hurting a close
friend or relative” and “If people would talk
less and work more, everybody would be
better off.”
RESULTS

ment with the statements. In contrast, the
patients who made high scores initially
showed little change on retesting, indicating
that they agreed with the statements to the
same extent even when their meanings were
reversed.
Change in F Score with convulsive therapy.
In a second study, 69 consecutive hospitalized patients referred for convulsive therapy
were given the F Scale in the week prior to
treatment, on the day following the 12th
treatment, and two weeks after the termination of treatment. These patients were divided into two groups; an experimental
group of 59, and a control group of ten patients randomly selected from the referrals.
In the experimental group all patients received grand mal convulsive therapy, while
the control group received subconvulsive
electro-stimulation only. All patients were
treated three times a week, for a minimum
of 12 treatments.
The degree of physiologic change during
treatment was determined by quantitative
analyses of delta activity in the EEG, using
techniques previously described (5). EEG
records were obtained weekly and the records taken nearest the 12th treatment were
measured for the degree of induced slow
wave activity (the per cent time occupied by
waves of 6 cps or slower for 66 seconds of
recording from the anterior temporal—vertex
leads).
The changes in F score during convulsive
treatment are shown in Table 2. There was
a mean increase of +5.7 in F score during

What the F Scale measures in this population: the “reverse” F Scale. In this study the
entire in-patient population was ﬁrst tested
with the conventional scale, then retested
one month later with a “reverse” scale (2).
In the “reverse” scale the same items are
used, but stated in opposite terms to the
original. Thus, the ﬁrst example cited above
is changed to read, “A sane, normal, decent
person might have to hurt a close friend or
relative.” The “reverse” scale is scored in
the same manner as the regular scale, with
TABLE 2
Eﬁect of Convulsive Treatment on F Score
high scores reflecting greater agreement.
The relation of the scores on the convenMean F Score
tional to the “reverse” scales is shown in
N
PreTable 1. The patients were divided into two
Mean
During
t
Treatment
Difference
22:?
the
to
median
groups according
score on the
conventional scale. Those patients who made
Convulsive 59 45.3
51.0
2.02*
+5.7
low scores initially, indicating predominant
Group
10
48.7
disagreement with the statements, showed a Control
49.2
+0.5 0.02
Group
signiﬁcant increase in score on the “reverse”
*
scale, indicating that they were now in agreeSigniﬁcant at .05 level

�189

SOCIAL ATTITUDE AND ECT

treatment, a difference signiﬁcant at the ﬁve
the
of
conﬁdence.
In
level
cent
contrast,
per
control group showed a statistically insigniﬁcant change during the same period.
The effect of convulsive therapy on the F
score was further demonstrated by an analysis of seven patients, originally in the control group, who were subsequently placed on
a regular course of convulsive therapy. On
retest after 12 control treatments their scores
were unchanged, with a mean difference
from the pretreatment score of +0.1. After
12 convulsive treatments, however, these
patients showed a signiﬁcant mean increase
of +9.1.
Adequate EEG records at the time of the
12th treatment were obtained for 54 patients. For this analysis the records were
divided into two groups according to the
degree of slow wave activity: a high delta
index group in whom slow wave activity
appeared in 40 per cent or more of the
selected leads, and a low delta index group
in whom the slow wave activity was less than
40 per cent. Changes in F scores during treat—
ment for the two groups are shown in Table
3.

TABLE 3
Change in F Score and Degree of Induced Cerebral
Dysfunction
Mean
Treatment Treatment Difference
Pre-

During

27

43.9

52.5

+8.6

23*

27

45.6

49.0

+3.4

0.8

Degree of Slow
Wave Activity

High Delta
Index

Low Delta

Index
*

15

Signiﬁcant at .05 level

The patients with high degrees of slow
wave activity had a mean increase in F score
of +8.6, signiﬁcant at the ﬁve per cent level
of conﬁdence. Those patients with low delta
indices showed a relatively small increase of
+3.4. While the increase in scores in the
low delta activity group was statistically
insigniﬁcant, it was greater than that of the
control group (Table 2).

TABLE 4
Pre-Treatment and Post—Treatment F Scores
Pre—

Post—

21

42.2

40.6

—1.6

0.4

16

42.6

42.1

—0.5

0.1

N

High Delta
Index

Low Delta

Index

.Mean
Treatment Treatment Diﬂerence

I

F scores were obtained in 44 patients two
weeks after the last treatment (Table 4).
The mean difference between pre— and posttreatment scores was statistically insigniﬁcant. Furthermore, the same pattern of a
small decrease in score was found for both
the high and low delta activity groups.
DISCUSSION

These observations demonstrate the relevance of the F Scale to the convulsive ther—
of
these
An
understanding
apy process.
relationships requires examination of the psychological factors reﬂected by the F Scale in
our population.
The observations on the “reverse” F Scale
indicate that those patients who disagreed
with the original statements (low F score)
were responding to the content of the state—
ments. This was shown by the high degree
of agreement with the reverse statements.
Those patients who agreed with the original
statements (high F score), however, continued to agree when the statements were
reversed. Evidently, these patients were not
responding to the content of the statements,
but demonstrated a more generalized reac—
tion.
There have been several studies on non—
psychiatric populations using a “reverse” F
Scale, with conﬂicting results. Thus, Chris—
tie, Havel and Seidenberg (3) have found a
consistent response to content in original and
reverse scales, e.g., agreeing to one and disagreeing with the other, while Jackson, Messick and Solley (10) report a positive correlation between agreement on the two scales.
In part, these differences may be accounted
for by differences in the form of the reversed

�190

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

scale. Jackson and Messick (9) indicated
that Christie ct al. (3) modiﬁed the language
form of the original scale and reversed the
content, while Jackson et al. (10) retained
the extreme, cliché—ridden style of the origi—
nal scale. Jackson and Messick indicate that
the response pattern to the F Scale may be
interpreted in terms of response style rather
than speciﬁc item content. On the basis of
the data from our population there is a
difference between the high and low scorers

with respect to the extent that cognitive
style affects their response. The high scorers
who agree with both forms of the scale show
a consistent style of response acquiescence,
overgeneralization and conforming to so—
cially desirable standards. Those who scored
low on the original scale, however, did not
show the converse—a consistent pattern of
negativism or social non-conformity. Rather,
they altered their style to agree with the con—
tent when the statements were reversed.
Thus, low F score patients were characteristically more critical and discriminating
persons, While those with high F scores were
more undifferentiating and stereotyped in
their reactions.
With this conception of the F Scale, the
ﬁndings in convulsive therapy may be considered. In the selection of treatment in this
institution, those patients receiving convul—
sive therapy had signiﬁcantly higher scores
than those receiving psychotherapy only
(17). That this observation is not simply a
reflection of diagnosis is seen in the differentiation by the F score of the selection of
treatment even among those patients classi—
ﬁed as psychotic depression. The selection of
treatment thus seems related to psycho—
logical processes reflected in the F Scale.
Subjects with high F scores, with stereotypy
of thinking and difﬁculty in introspection,
often present a behavioral pattern incompatible with the establishment of the type of
interpersonal relationships required in psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy.
The favorable evaluations of therapeutic

response to convulsive therapy in patients
with high F scores may be related to personality attributes. The psychological processes reﬂected in the F Scale are similar to
those personality factors previously found
to be related to a favorable response to such
treatment. In structured family interviews
it was observed that the favorably rated
patients had personality patterns characterized as nonempathic, nonintrospective,
nonverbally communicative, and highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imagi—
native or creative capacity (13). Consistent
patterns have been shown in Rorschach
studies indicating that good prognosis is re—
lated to a small number of responses, absence
of human movement and little diversiﬁcation
of content (7, 14).
The F score increases signiﬁcantly with
convulsive therapy with the extent of in—
crease related to the degree of altered brain
function, as measured by the degree of induced EEG slow wave activity. This relation
of change in behavior to physiological change
is an observation that has been consistently
noted in convulsive therapy patients (5).
The increase in F score during treatment
may have been even more marked than
actually observed. Several patients of foreign
birth and little education had maximum or
near maximum scores prior to treatment,
thus eliminating or reducing the possibility
of an increase on retesting.
The change in score with altered brain
function is consistent with previous observations on the behavioral effects of convulsive
therapy. In accord with our conceptual
framework, greater agreement with F Scale
items during treatment is related to increased stereotypy and difﬁculty in discrimination, as well as to increased acquiescence.
This is part of a general process which has
been noted in linguistic, perceptual and
clinical behavioral measures. In their language, convulsive therapy patients show
increased denial, evasion, qualiﬁcation and
use of clichés and stereotyped expressions

�SOCIAL ATTITUDE AND ECT

(12). They also manifest increased repetitiveness of words (11), difﬁculty in complex
visual and tactile perception (6) and ﬁgureground discrimination (16). Clinically, they
are characteristically more compliant and
acquiescent and try to please the examiner
(4).
SUMMARY

A measure of social attitude, the California
F Scale, has been utilized in studies of the

convulsive therapy process. In a voluntary
psychiatric hospital it was noted that patients referred for convulsive therapy had
signiﬁcantly higher F scores than those re—
ceiving psychotherapy only. Among the patients receiving convulsive therapy, those
with the higher initial F scores were evalu—
ated as showing the best clinical results.
With treatment there was a signiﬁcant increase in F score, with the increase related to
the degree of altered brain function. Follow—
ing treatment the scores returned to their
original level.
Comparison of results with a conventional
and “reverse” F Scale demonstrated that
patients with low F scores respond to the
content of the questionnaire, while those
with high F scores showed a generalized
of
the con—
of
independent
agreement
pattern
tent.
These results are interpreted in terms of
the psychological processes measured by the
F Scale. High—scoring patients are considered
to be stereotyped in their thinking and to
have difﬁculty in introspection—behavior
which is incompatible with psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy, rendering
them more liable to referral for convulsive
therapy. With treatment, such patients are
also more likely to develop the language
patterns of denial and use of clichés which
are the cues for evaluations of clinical improvement. The increase in F score with
treatment is comparable to other types of
behavioral change, such as increased acquiesin
ﬁgure-ground
increased
difﬁculty
cence,

191

discrimination, and increased stereotypy of
language.
REFERENCES
1. ADORNO, T. W. ET AL. The Authoritarian Personality. Harper, New York, 1950.
2. BAss, B. M. Authoritarianism or acquiescence?
J. Abnorm. &amp; Social Psychol., 51: 611—623,
1955.
3. CHRISTIE,

R., HAVEL, J. AND SEIDENBERG, B.
Is the F Scale irreversible? J. Abnorm. &amp;
Social Psychol., 56: 143—159, 1958.
4. FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Behavioral patterns
in induced states of altered brain function.
Paper read at Divisional Meeting, Am. Psychiat. Ass., New York, November, 1957.
5. FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Relation of EEG
delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock: quantitative serial studies. AMA
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 78: 516—525, 1957.

M., KAHN, R. L. AND KORIN, H. Effects
of diffuse altered brain function on perception. Internat. Congr. Psychol, Proc., 15:

6. FINK,

238—239, 1959.

7. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M.

Psychological factors affecting individual
differences in behavioral response to con—
vulsive therapy. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis, 128:

243—248, 1959.

J. AND ERLICH, I. Some sociopsychological characteristics of patients and their relevance for
psychiatric treatment. In The Patient and the
Mental Hospital, Greenblatt, M., Levinson,
D. J. and Williams, R. H., eds., pp. 357—379.
Free Press, Glencoe, 111., 1957.
9. JACKSON, D. N. AND MEssroK, S. J. Content
and style in personality assessment. Psychol.
Bull., 55: 243—252, 1958.
10. JACKSON, D. N., MESSICK, S. J. AND SOLLEY,
C. M. How “rigid” is the authoritarian? J.
Abnorm. &amp; Social Psychol., 54: 137—140,
8. GALLAGHER, E. B., LEVINSON, D.

1957.

J., FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Com—
munication patterns with altered brain function. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis., 130: 235—239,

11. JAFFE,

1960.
12. KAHN,

R. L. AND FINK, M. Changes in language during electroshock therapy. In Psy—
chopathology of Communication, Hoch, P. and
Zubin, J., eds., pp. 126—319. Grune &amp; Strat—
ton, New York, 1958.
13. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Personality factors
in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. J. Neuropsychiat., 1: 45—49, 1959.
14. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Prognostic value of
Rorschach criteria in clinical response to
convulsive therapy. J. Neuropsychiat. In
press.
15. KAHN, R. L., FINK, M. AND WEINSTEIN, E. A.
Relation of amobarbital test to clinical im-

�192

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

provement in electroshock. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76: 23—29, 1956.

16. KAHN,

R. L., POLLACK, M.

AND

ure—ground discrimination

FINK, M.

Fig—

after induced altered brain function. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
In press.

17. KAHN,

R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M. Social

factors in the selection of therapy in a vol—
untary mental hospital. J. Hillside Hosp, 6:

216—228, 1957.

18. KAHN, R.

L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Sociopsychological aspects of psychiatric
treatment. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
1: 565—574, 1959.

,

�Social Attitude (Californin

3

Scale) and convulsivo

Ihornpy
Robort L.Kahn Ph.n., Kn: Polluek Ph.D.
and
ﬂux

rink

H.D.

Dcpurtnont a! Experimentnl Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
61"! 0.1(3' litre, 3.1.
~

IX;

11/10/59

�mu. 1: part, at t» mun run-hum. tannins“.
nuuczym, April, ”58.
3*91‘1
1»
try
at
“.2092
«a
put.
at
um,
an”
“tuna menu» a: mm mu. “an“ Inﬂux“:
of Inn“. was. ”In.“ mm: aunt“.

�3.3111 Attitude and E0!

�Boeial Attitude (Galifornia

I

Scale) and Convnleive

Therapy

Studies of the node of action of convulsive therapy in
altering behavior have been under investigation by a variety
of experimental methods in our laboratory for several years.
Early studies demonstrated a relationship between clinical
evaluations of inproveaent and the degree of altered brain
function as measured by the aaobarbital test (12) and the
electroencephalogram (h). Personality patterns related to a
favorable therapeutic outeone have been defined by fanily
interviews (13) and projective techniques (15). Behavioral
changes have been neasured by eeaplex visual and tactile
perceptual tasks (6) and by analyses of changes in syntactical
aspects of language (16).

recently we have become increasingly aware of the
relation of seeiopsyehelegieal factors to differences in both
referral for, and response to, convulsive therapy. In a
study of the entire adult in-patient population of Hillside
hospital it was found that these patients referred for convulsive
therapy were significantly older, more likely to have been
foreign-born, had less education and higher scores on the
Californi I Scale than these patients who received psychotherapy
alone (17). Of those patients receiving convulsive therapy,
a favorable therapeutic evaluation of recovered er much iapreved
was nest likely in those who were older, aore poorly educated,
foreign-born and with higher 7 scores (18).
Here

�1h. 31: 0: ts. pr.nunt tavcnttanttonl.wun to turtle:
'utniy tho convulntvo thorny: pronoun h: £3. at. or «p.
6.113.231: r Saul. (1). Althotgh prcanllt‘nd 1: a cutting
white tn‘iroat at: located an prtandicc tad luthnrttnrtanxln,
tho I Ital. wt: d-utgnod to it‘lxuto paychcloginnl napocto, such

a: convontilnlltun, rigidity and Itarcnﬁyyy, rclutcd to thy
n;nt£cn#n$t¢n a: tin:- :0aiul attitudes.

I

It wan

OI! apuctltc ptrpnna to

how
und
2)
pnychtatrta
poyuzntiou,
t
acaln 1.210: with Chllg! in brain function.

83:19 acanurul 13

rtiptnao

$0

it. I

naturist. 1) tint tho

�KBIEOD:

Pepnlationt These studies have been conducted at
hillside Hospital, a private, nanoprerit 200 bed psychiatric
hospital in New York City adaitting relentary patients with
Iearly and enrahle aental illness". rPsyeheanalytiosllyu
oriented psychotherapy is the treatment of choice for all
(convulsive,
with
senatie
therapies
patients,
insulin cans
and drug therapies) regarded as ancillary, but available when
needed. The in-patient populatien epneiste mainly of niddleclass Jewish patients, with a high school education, between
the ages of 18 and ho. Most patients are classified into the
diagnostic categories of schieophrenia, psychonenrosis, manicdepressive and invelntienal psychosis.
In these studies we have need a ten its: aeditieation
e! the standard scale (8). The procedure consists of having
the subject read ten stateaents and indicating te‘Whet extent
he agrees or disagrees with each, i.e. a little, pretty each,
or very such. The score for each item ranges tron one to
seven, and the tetal sears range is 10 to 70, with high scores
indicating greater asreenent with the otatenents. The statenente
are extreme, uncritical er stereotyped expressions, such as:
"No sane,neraal, deeent person would ever think or hurting a
close friend or relative‘ and "If people would talk less and
work acre, everybody would be better air.”

�RESELISs

the 1 Scale Heaenree in our Po nlatione The i'ne'nn-ae'“ F Scale
In this stat: the entire in-patient population was tiret
tested with the contentional eeale, then reteeted one nenth
later with a 'reveree' eeib (2). 'In the "reverse" scale the
sane items were need, but stated in opposite terms to the
original. Thus the liret example cited above was ohanged to
read, ”A aane, normal, decent person night have to hurt a
The
close friend or relative."
9reverse'eea1e was scored in
the eane manner as the regular scale, with high score: reflecting
What

greater agreement.
the relation of the eeoree on the conventional to the
“reverse“ eealee 1e ehovn in table I. The patienta were divided
into two group: according to the nedian aoore en the conventional
eeele. Those patiente who node low eeeree initially, indicating
predoninant dieagraeaent with the etatenente, ehoved a significant
innfeaae in score on the 'reveree“ scale, indicating that they
were not in agreement with the statements. In contrast, the
patients who aade high eeoree initially showed little change
on retenting, indieating that they agreed with the etatenente
to the sane extent even when their meanings were reversed.
-u-abﬁooogqﬁ‘mmn—tun‘m

Table I about here
Dun-Qn-uueembebuuﬁua-Oepn.

�TABLE

I

Scar-a on Conventional and 'Rovorao'

Dichotonisod
Graugs

Kcan Scorn

conventional
Soul.
~!_

I ﬁction

noun Score

“levcrao'
Se&amp;lo

Dirt.

.£_
20.3‘

10-37

76

26.3

51.5

+25. 2

36.70

79

h7.h

h8.1

+

”Signitietnt at .001 luvol

0.7

0.6

�.5-

I

score with cenvuleive theregz.
In e eeoond etody, 69 eoneeoutive heepitelieed petiente
referred for eonvnleive therepy were given the r seele in
the week prior-to treetwent, on the dey following the 12th
treetwent, end two weeke etter the terninetion er treeteent.
Theee pdiente were divided into two groupe,en experimentel
group of 59, end I control group or ten petiente tenderly
selected from the reterrelea In the experieentel group e11
petiente reeeived greed eel oeuvuleive therepy, while the
control group received enbeonvuleive electro-etieuletien only.
All petiente were treeted three tieee e week, for e nininne
Change

e1 12

in

treeteente.

,

physiologic ohenge during ‘lreetnent wee
deterrined by queutitetive enelyeee of delta eotivity in the
EEG, neing teehniquee previoneh deeerihed (h). EEG reoorde
were ebteined weekly end the reeerde token neereet the 12th
treetnent were neeeered for the degree of induced elow were
6
wevee
o:
by
cent
ocoopied
ope or
(the
tine
eetivity
per
elewer for 66 eeeonde of recording from the enterior tenperelvertex leede).
The ehengee in r eeore during oonvuleive treetnent ere
ehewn in Tehb 2. There wee e ween increeee of +5.? in r
eeore during treetwent, e difference eignificent et the 55
level of confidence. In contreet, the control group ehowed
e etetietieelly iheighitioent chenge during the eeee period.
The degree of

�.6.

it.

attics if

nouvnlntvt thorny, an in. r atnvn vat
tnrihur dcnouatraﬁua by a: ina1ruaa if aovoa pattcltug'
originallyjtn the nautrll crux», vi. wart t‘§u¢.u¢ut11 plant:
fﬂtﬁﬁﬁ
33%.:
an
«mutilatvu
of
neuron
$hurtyy.
rcculur
a
a:
13 anntral trunthaut: that: Iqurca utrn tuuhauucu. ‘1‘» a
mans ditftruuao :tcn tut protrcatunut tutti Q3 «9.1 errorn.
Altar 12 nnuvulntvo trtatlcuta, ﬁauuvur, than. ptiiia‘t unavod
:1mm». a: 09.1 anew.

“want u»

tibla

5h

but.

it. its. at

tin 12th irontntat
pﬂttﬂt‘ﬂ. In! $htt tnnlyttn tho Instant

Adogua§a BIB roaorda

var. ubtntnoa tor

a about
3%

Itvtdndjin£o tut nauupo'nno.r¢ina ‘9 it. 1.33%. at Ilia
var. ntilvltyu a high dixﬁc 13am: group‘tn ulna slaw unvrunttvtty Ip’cntod 1n ho: or nor. 0: ti. stlcutod Ionic. Qua
a lll‘lfl‘ﬁ ludax (ran; 1: that th. III! II'. naﬁlvtty u:Xcal than 801. Gianna. in I liﬁvﬂﬂ ﬂ!rtll $2¢usnoat fur
ﬁt. in. groups .9. shut: in rabid 3.

warn

‘

.C'OOUMﬁOWQ‘ﬁQD‘OOO‘

Inhla 3 thont but.
ﬂ. “’.*“*Q*&amp;.*QOOQQU

In. ytﬁiunta with high 4.3!!!! a:

axon any!

aattvity

had n

o: «8.é. significanﬁ tt tho 5! 10'01
at conttdtnnc. than. putianta with 10v 401‘: iadlceu uhluud

lama

ilerillt

1a 9 t¢¢ru

�TABLE 2

Effect of Convulsivo Treatnent

on

r

Score

Raga P Saute

1

Pre~

treatnont

During
Treatment

Convuluive Group

59

h5.3

51.0

control Group

10

h8.7

h9.2

‘ Significant at

.05 lovcl

noun

Difference 3
+ 5.7
2.02*
+

0.5

0.02

�TABLE 3

Chan 0

in

r

Scare and

chroo or
31.u Huvc ctivit

De

roe o: Induood Cor-bral
Pro»

‘g

During

front-out rroatnont

D

stunctioa

noun

Differenco

t

ligh molt. Index

27

h3.9

52.5

+8.6

2.3“

Lov'nolta Indox

27

h§.6

h9.0

+3.h

0.8

G

Significnnt 1t .05 level

�-1-

relatively small inereuso of +3.h. Hhilo the increase
in scores in the low delta nativity group was stutiatioally
insignificant, it ran grout-r thtn that or the control

a

(table 2).
1 score: were abtainod in hh patient: two racks utter
the 1tat troatnnnt (T‘ble h). The noun ditfcrnnec botvccn
pro~ tad ponttruatncnt scorcs ﬁll statistically insignifictnt.
Furthermore, tho 5.30 puttsrn or a 3:111 door-nae 1n acor$gw
found
1nd
both
the
for
high
delta totittty group:
v:a
graup

.--Q-‘-~-"-..-ﬂﬁﬁ-..
Table h thout hora

.‘..--*-‘Cﬂ-‘-‘-~‘-ﬂ‘

�an:
t

Index

Low

Delta

Indox

ttrontncnt

1

Score:

Prc~

Pout—

Kean

Trautnent

Trontnent

Difference

21

h2.2

h0.6

16

h2.6

h2.1

3|

High Delta

h

~1.6

«0.5

0.1

�DISGU8SION:

These observations demonstrate the relevance of tho

to the oonvnleivo therapy proooea. in understanding
of theeo relationships requiroe oxanination of the payoholegioal
factors reflected by the 7 Scale in our population.
The obeorvationa on the reverse F scale indicatee that
those pationte who diaagroed with the original etatonente
(low r eoore) were responding to the content or the otatonente.
Thie nae shown by the high degree or agreement with the rarer-o
statoaente. However, thoee patiente who agreed with the
original etatononto (high I eoere) continued to agree when
the etatenente were revereed. Evidently, these patient:
were not reephnding to the oontent e! the atatonente, but
deaenatrated a noro generalised reaction.
There have been several otudioo on nenpeyohiatrio
populations neing a reverse I soelo, with conflicting reenlte.
Thno, Christie, ﬂoral and Seidonberg (3) have found a coneiatont
roeponeo to content in original and rovoreo ooaloe, o. .,
agreeing to one and disagreeing with the other, while Jackson,
Heeeiok and Selley (9) retort a positive correlation between
agreement on the two eoalee. In part, theoe dittoronooe nay
be accounted for by difference: in the tern of the rovoreod
eoalo. Jackson and Heeeiok (10) indicated that Chrietie gt
3;. (3) modified the language fora of the original scale
and reversed the content, while Jaokeon et a1. (9) retained
the extreao, olioho1ridden etyle e: the original eoalo.
Jackson and noeeick indicate that the reeponoo pattern to
7 Scale

�«91-

the 1 Scale nsy be interpreted in terne of response style
rsther then specific item content. 0n the besis or the
dots from our popnlsticn there is s difference between the
high end low scores with respect to the extent thst cognitive
style effects their response. the high scorers who egree
with both ferns or the sonic lion s consistent style of

response ecqniescsnoe, evergenerelisetien end contorning
to secislly desireble stendsrds. Those who scored low on
the originsi sosie, however, did not shoe the converse -.

s consistent psttern or negotivisn or sociel nenvcentornity.
they eltered their style to egree with the content when the
ststononts were reversed. ‘Thns, low I score petients were

cherscteristicsily nore critical snd.decrildnsting persons,
while these with high I scores were norc nndittcrontieting
end stereotyped in their resctione.
With this conception of the r Seth, the findings in

convulsive thorspy may be considered. In the selection or
trectnent in this institntion, those psticnts receiving
convulsive therapy had significantly higher scores then
those recciving psychotherapy only (17). That this observs~
tion is not Just e reflection of diagnosis is seen in the
dittorsntietion by the F score of the selection of trestnent
oven snong those pstients clsssitied es psychotic depression.
The selection of treatment than scone related to poyohologicsl

processes reflected in the

r

Scale.

Subjects with high

I

�-10.
scores, with etereetypy of thinking end difficulty in
introepectien, often preeent a behavioral pattern incompatible
with the eatebliehaent of the type of interpereenal reletien~
ehipe required in peycheanalytically-eriented psychotherapy.
The favorable evaluatiene of therapetic reopenee to
eonvulaive therapy in patienta with high I acoree nay be
related to pereenality attributee. The psychological prov
eeeaee reflected in the I Scale are similar to those
pereonality factors previeuely related to a favorable rcepenae
to each treatment. In structured family intervieea it vat
observed that the faverabl! rated patients had personality
patterns characterised as neuenpathic, conintrespectivc,
nenverbally eeamenicative, and highly conventional and
stereotyped, with little nonnative or creative capacity
(13). Genaistent patterns have been aheen in Rcrachaeh
etudiee indielting that good prognosis in related to a small
number of reepeneee, absence of human movement and little
divereifieatien of content (15; 7).
The F acere increecee significantly with cenvuleive
therapy with the extent of increase related to the degree of
altered brain function, as measured by the degree of induced
EEG slow wave activity.
This relation of change in behavior
to physiological change is an observation that has been
coneietently noted in cenvulaive therapy patients (h).
The increaee in I accre during treataent may have been even

�nere marked than eetnelly observed. Severel patients of
tereignobirth and little edneetion hed retina: er nee:
nexinnn eeeree print to treatment, thne elinineting or
reducing the peeeibility er en increeee en retenting.
The ehenge in eeere with altered brein function is
eeneietent with previous obeervetiene on the behevierel
effects 0: convulsive therapy. In eeeerd with our oeueeptnel
trenewerk, greater egreenent with I Scele items during treete
tent in related to inereeeed etereetypy and difficulty in
dieerininetien, ll velx ee increeeed eeqeieeeenee. rue 1e
preeeee
whieh hee been noted 1n‘11ngn1et1e,
e
e!
general
pert
neeeuree.
and
In their
behavierel
clinieel
perceptual
language, cenvnleive therepy patient: shew inereeeed deniel,
cliche:
end etereetyped
end
er
use
eve-inn, qualification
expreeeiene (16). They elee nenifeet increased repetitiveneee
of words (11), difficulty in aenplex Vienel end tectile per—
eeptien (6) end figureggreund discriminetien (1h). Clinieelly,
eke
they
chereeterieticelly here oeup}1ent end ecqnieecent
and try to pleeee the exeniner (S).

�-12-

annular:
neaenre

e: social attitude, the California 1 Scale,
has been utilised in etadiee o! the convulsive therapy proceee.
In a voluntary psychiatric hoepital it wee noted that patients
referred for oonvnlaive therapy had eigniticantly higher I
A

aoorea than theee receiving psychotherapy only. Anon; the
patiente receiving convulsive therapy, theee with the higher

initial 7 ecoree were evaluated ae showing the beet clinical
reellta. With treatment there waa a significant increase in
r ecore, with the ineroaae related to the degree or altered brain
function. Following treataent the ecoree returned to their;
original level.
comparison of reenlte with a conventional and "reverne'l
r eoale concentrated that low I acore patiente respond to the
content or the questionnaire, while these with high I eoeree
ahowed a generalized pattern or agreement independent of the
content.
There results are interpreted in tern: of the psychological
proceeeee neaenred by the F Scale. High 1 score patients are
coneidered to be aterectyped in their thinking and to have
ditticnlty in introspection ~- behavior whih is incompatible
with peychoanalytioally-oriented psychotherapy, rendering than
acre liable to referral for convnleive therapy. With treatnent,
enoh patients are aleo acre likely to develop the language
patterna of denial and nee o: cliche} which are the one: for
evalnatione or clinical improvement. the inoreaae in I score
with treataont is conparahle to the other types of behavioral

�ohnnxo, such

:-

1n figure—around

of lungntga.

inerouocd noqniouconcc, increased

ditticnlty

disarininntign, tad incroalod stereotypy

�Reference-

1. Aderno, !.H., Frankel—Brunswick, 3., Levin-on, D.J. and
Sanford, 1.3. The Antheritarian Pereonalitz.
Harper, low rerk, 1950.
2. ‘Baee, B. n. Antheritarianion or aeqniooeenoe? J. Abnern.
&amp; scan Pezeho1.,
5;. 611~623, 1955.
3. chriotie, 3., Havel, 3., and Beidenberg, I. II the P
Scale irreversible? J. Abnorn. ﬂee. Pezche1., ﬁg:
I

1h3~1§9, 1958.

Fink, H. and Kahn, R.L. Reletion of EEG delta activity
to behavioral reeponee in electroshock: quantitative
eerial etndiee. 1.x.i. Arch. Henrol. &amp; Po ehiat.,
1Q; 516-525, 1957.

3.2.
and
3ehaviora1 patterno in induced
Kahn,
n.
Iink,
etetee or altered brain function. Paper read at
Diviaional Meeting, Aner. Peyohiat. Lee., low York,
levenber, 1957.
6. Fink, H., Iahn, R.L. and Kevin, 3. Effects of diffuse
eltered brain tnnntien en perception. Proc. 1? Int.
sonar. szohel. Anatordans Northelolland Pnb1.,
V

pp. 238-239, 1959.

Fink, x., Kahn, R.L. and Pollack,

Psychological
factors attenting individual ditteronoee in
behavioral response to convuleive therapy.

J. lorv.

&amp;

lent. Dio.,

M.

128: 2h3~2h8, 1959.

�-2Referancoa

Gallagher, E.B., Ltviason, D.J. and Erlich, I. Some
sociopsycholcgical chaructoriatics of patiants and
their rclavuneo tor paychintric treatnont. In

Groonblntt, 9.5. Lovinlon und 3.x. Williams (Edl.)
The Pttiont und the Hpntnl iosgittl. The Pro. Prosl,
H.

alencoo, 111. pp. 357-379, 195?.
Jack-on, 3.3., Herrick S.J., and Bailey, c.n. 30v “rigid“
is the autharitnrinn? J. Abnorm. soc. Pnzchol. ﬁg:
137~1h0, 1957.

10.

Junk-tn, 9.1. and Herrick, 5.3. content and style in
personality anion-none. Patchol. 3‘11., 2;: 2&amp;3-252,
1958.

11.

antic, 3., Fiat,

R.L. Communication pattorns
with ulterod brain function. J. Harv. &amp; Rent. 313.,
H. and Kuhn,

in prons.
12.

8.1., link, E. 3nd WeinttOin, E.A. Relation of
anobarhital tent to clinical inprovonont in oloctro¢

Kuhn,

shook. A.H.A. Arch. Konrol. Pazchint., 1g. 23»29,
1956.
13.

Inna, 1.1. ind link, x. Personality factor: in bohuvior¢1
response to olootraahook thornpy. J. learn I ehiut.,
l3 h5-h9, 1959.
Inna, R.L., Pellaek, l. £34 rink, H. Figaro-ground
dinorininaticn after indueod ultcrod brain inaction.
A.H.A. Arch.

louroi.,ﬁiu pron:

�15.

rink, H. Prague-tie value at hereohaeh
criteria in clinical response to convulsive therapy.

Kuhn, R.L. and

Paper read

at Bleetreeheck

Reaeareh Aee., san

Francisco, 1958.
16.

Iahn, R.L. and link, H. changes in language during
oleetroeheck therapy. In P. ﬂesh and J. Znhin (Ede.),
Pazehegatholegz et columnieatien. Grune and stratten,

l.‘

Yorke ppe 126‘139e 1958a

R.L., Pellaek, H. and link, H. social tactora 1n
the selection at therapy in a veluntary mental
helpital. J. Hill-1h Hung. Q: nos-:20, 1957.
18. Iahn, n.L., rellaek, H. and rink, u. seexepeyehelexieal
aepeete at ﬁeyehiatrie treatleut. Arch. Gen.
Pezchiat., in press.
17.

Kahn,

�Social Attitude Questionnaire (F Scale)*
Below are a number of‘statements. For each statement we
want you to give us your personal opinion of'whether you agree
or disagree, and how much.

.3

g

5
8

&gt;3

am

:&gt;

o
(I)

:4

ﬁ
g

&gt;&gt;
+3

43
m

a
{34

m

(D

M

m

r1

9
+2

'H

H
c6

w

0)

3
3

vi
H

8

E

g

5’

S

pm

(D

((3

Q1

L"

w

m
a)

m
a)

m

m

p
’

0
h

w
(6

m

aw

£6

m

better
When

talk less

ho
w

no

a

-H

"-4

rd

0

F1

Pi

F4

F4

F1

+4

H

U

U

...................

and work more, everybody would be

offOOCOICOOOOOQ. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
.

think about

it,

it is

best for him not to
but to keep busy with more cheerful things .......

a person has a problem or worry,

the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determination, and the will to work and fight for family and country ......

What

I

different kinds of people mix together
to protect himself especially carefully
infection or disease from them ...............

Nowadays when so many
so much, a person has

against catching an

crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.......
.
Sex

................... .....................

best teacher or boss is the one who tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to go about it. ...... .

The

.....................

people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow up
they ought to get over them and settle down

Young

People can be divided into two

the strong.... ..... ...
*From

......................

distinct classes: the

weak and

.................. ........................
.

Gallagher, Levinson and Erlich (1957).

Scoring:

I agree very much ....... +7
I agree pretty much.....+6
I agree a little ........ +5

I can't say ............

I disagree very much ....... +1
I disagree pretty much ..... +2
I disagree a little
+3

+h

43

ho
w

.......................................

people would

h

aw

m
-H

5-4

Science has its place, but there are many important things
that must always be beyond human understanding

If

h
a

$4

sane, normal decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation..

No

8

........

$3

as

�Appendix

Social Attitude Questionnaire (F Scale)*
Felow are a number of statements. For each statement we want you
to give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree.
Answer each statement according to one of the following:

I

AGREE A LITTLE

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

I

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY MUCH

1.

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation.
No

2. Science has its place, but there are many important things
must always be beyond human understanding.
3.

If

better off.

that

people would talk less and work more, everybody would be

a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not to
think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

tion,

A.

When

5.

What

and the

the youth needs most is

will to

strict discipline,

rugged determina—

fight for family and country.
6. Nowadays when so many different kinds of people mix together
much, a person has to protect himself especially carefully against
catching an infection or disease from them.
work and

so

7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicaly whipped, or

worse.

is

8. The best teacher or boss
to be done and how to go about

is the

it.

one who

tells

us exactly what

people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down.
9.

10.

Young

PeOple can be divided

the strong.

into

two

distinct classes: the

weak and

-————————————.__.__—_—______
*

Gallagher, Levinson and Erlich (1957).
Scoring: Agreement is scored as +7 (agree very much), +6 (agree pretty much),
and +5 (agree a little); +h for no response or uncertain; +3
(disagree a little), +2 (disagree pretty much), and +1 (disagree
very much). The ten items are summed for a single F—Scale Score.
From

�CONVULSIVE THERAPY PROJECT

—

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, INC.

§gpia1 Attitude Questionnaire

{F

ScaIe)

aha a numbed 05 Atatemcnia. Fox each Ataiemeni we
want you to give uA gout geaéonaﬁ Opinion 05 whethea you agaee
Beﬁow

on

disagree, and

.C.‘

0

how much.

g

much

m

G)

very

H
94

muc

3

&gt;5

JJ
U

little

-

much

4-)

a

H
1—!

pretty

very

CE!

cisagree

agree

say

t
can

I

I

sane, normal decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation. ..... ‘u.......... .....

No

Science has

its place,

.............,...

but there are many important things

that must always be beyond

human

understanding................

If people would talk less and work more, everybody would be
better off....................................................
I

‘

then a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not to
think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things....

I

If
I

the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determina—
tion, and the will to work and fight for family and country...

What

different kinds of people mix together
to protect himself especially carefully
infection or disease from them ..... .......

Nowadays when so many
so much, a person has

against catching an

I

crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse...................
..
Sex

I

......... ...............
.

The

best teacher or boss is the one

is to

be done and

hOW

tells

us exactly what
to‘go about ituu'oonltocconcoct-cocooooowho

Young people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down................

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak

and the strongOIOOIIOOIOOQOOOOOCOOIIOIOOIOIICOOCIOIOOCOOIIOICI

I

“"“'{'
I

i,

i

'

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2774">
                <text>Social attitude (California F Scale) and convulsive therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1960 Mar; 130:187-92.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2775">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2776">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-46-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2777">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2778">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2779">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2780">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2781">
                <text>[Preprint] with questionaire and reprint. Reprint from THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Volume 130, No .3, March 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2782">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2783">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74480">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81041">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87602">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94163">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="253" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="44">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2e0c07f8713070c07cedfceccd13935e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f963256ba3adedd04d38ff5d4403fc1f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100670">
                    <text>Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy

in a Voluntary Mantel Hospital

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Max

From

Fink,

M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by Grant Me927 of the National

Health Service.
10-8-57

N.Y.

Institute of Mantel Health, U.S. Public

j

M M

3:)

�Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between social

class

and

illness (3, 5, 6,
and

and incidence of mental

psychiatric disorder with respect to type

therapeutic

selection

13, 1h),

outcome (10).

The

and maintenance of treatment (2,

6, 15),

present study is concerned with social

factors in the selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Bollingshead, Redlich and their co—workers
(3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of

classes

New Haven was

divided into five social

basis of weighted criteria of education, occupation

on the

of residence.

Of

the residents

who were under

and place

psychiatric care, those

from

the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while
organic treatment or custodial care
Of

was more common among

the psychotherapies, psychoanalysis

groups.

was

entirely restricted to the

two upper

Social class was the predominant determinant of the type of treatment

selected even
as follows:

when

the diagnosis

"..... it is

found

was

held constant. They summarize their results

that treatment does not

and medical determinants alone, but on the

well.

the lower classes.

depend on psychological

status position of the patient as

degree
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high

to the upper social levels.

The

data of this study

would seem

to indicate that

most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where the background of the patient

is similar to that of the therapist" (15).

It is

possible to relate the results obtained from these

community

studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the

�- 2 -

extent and type of treatment facilities available.

A

more

critical test of the

importance of social factors affecting choice of treatment would be in a setting

therapeutic techniques and services are available to

where the same

This requirement

is

met

all patients.

at Hillside Hospital. It is a non-profit,

sectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with "early
curable mental symptoms" (h),
pay.

are admitted regardless of their

and

ability to

criteria for accepting patients is their "ability to

of the main

One

who

non-

participate profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy

available

is regarded as the

when needed.

primary method of treatment with organic therapies

The average

length of hospital stay

is six

months,

al-

though some patients remain for as long as a year.
The

present investigation is

of electroshock therapy.

an outgrowth of

In previous work

several years of study

it has been

shown

that certain

aspects of personality were significantly related to patient selection and

therapeutic efficacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose

patients differ

of the present study

from those

was

to determine whether electroshock

receiving other forms of treatment in regard to

cultural background, including such factors as education
and

personality as measured by the California

F

and place

of birth,

scale (1); secondly, whether

these factors were also related to referral for adjunctive hoSpital services.

�m:

Population:

as of March 7,

The

1957 was

entire in-patient adult population of Hillside Hbspital

studied. This constituted a total of

ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a

mean

172

of 3h.6, and including

patients,

58 men and

11h women.

1) The population was subdivided

Procedure:

into three groups according

to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy, (b) insulin

coma

therapy,

and (c) psychotherapy only. *

2) The groups were compared for age, education and place

of birth.
I

3)

of the California

naire (see

F

All patients

were

tested

scale suggested by Levinson (9).

Appendix) which has been

The F

scale

The

patient reads ten statements

indicates whether he agrees or disagrees with each statement

tent.

The

and

score given for each item ranges from one to seven and the

score range is

tained.

is a question-

related to such factors as authoritarianism,

acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
and

** with a ten-item.modification

The

10

to 70.

The

to what ex-

total

greater the agreement the higher the score

ob—

statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this
management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data was
included in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subJects.

* All

patients were tested with the F scale
prior to treatment. In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on march 7th their pre-treatment scores were used in the statistical compar-

** As

part of

ison since
treatment.

an ongoing study

all the

EST

it had been found that EST

significantly affects the score during

�-uh) The population was subdivided in regard

of certain adjunctive services in the hospital.

Among

to utilization

such services available

are group

activities, occupational therapy, psychological testing

therapy.

The

latter is a diagnostic

and

and

creative

therapeutic service consisting of a

series of controlled painting procedures which are considered to be analogies
of

life experience (18). Psychological testing

and creative therapy were

selected for this study because both require a specific referral from the

therapist.

�RESULTS:

data

The

1) comparison of the treatment

was analyzed as follows:

scores and place of
groups for age, education, F scale
where diagnosis

is held constant,

prior to treatment,

birth, 2) comparison

significance of length of hospitalization

3)

and h) comparison between groups

referred for adjunctive

hospital services.

I.

Comparison of Treatment Groups:

For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard devia-

-tions for the
Table

I.

F

scale scores,

The EST group had

age and years of schooling are presented in

higher

P

scores,

was

older and had fewer years

of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These

differences
reach

were

statistically significant for

statistical significance for education.

cation to differentiate the groups
electroshock group contained

many

was due,

F

score and age but failed to

The

failure of years of edu-

in part, to the fact that the

foreign born patients whose education

was

treatment groups were subdivided into

difficult to evaluate accurately.

When

number of

eight years of education, the difference

was

patients

above and below

significant at the .01 level.

not differ

statistically for

The

insulin

any of these

and psychotherapy groups did

factors.

�Hague

uwumuom

auom

$5

$5

nMﬁmnom

m
mo

2
$3

Agooav

muwam
awamuom

.nuom

no

modem
m&gt;ﬁuaz

nvuwm

amousm

a

m

m

383

“somv

33$

mm

mﬂ

8

$8

Aﬂoav

no

qmﬁwuom

$8

anon

a

nowpwoscm

um

anon

can

muaam

wkﬁd

.ummm

3me
nuhum

o

nahwm

m

$ﬁ&gt;u%

ma

once

$8

.mw&lt;

H
6m-

.cm

no

auhoom

we

0

b

made»

How

0

8H

$5

Ammv

:5

m

H

.~

m;

w.m

*Réudx

.cm

am

Ho

unmanamua

ma

aonm

mqmdg

masono

a.

$8

Aﬁmmv

mummy

cams

8.3

«a

0.3

H.ma

8;:

m.:

can:

mi

m.mm

3m

am

93

m.ma

9.:

gums

3:

am

p

***om.w

dﬁa

m.w

N.H

a

***mm.a

***ww.m

m:.~

mm.”

H.H

m&gt;.H

pnmnwuhan

mw¢

can:

.33

~.m

o.m

&gt;.:H

mo

nomwnmmsoo

a

**Aa.m

mm.

m&gt;.m

Hm&gt;oﬁ
amped

Hm&gt;ma

no.

do.

«a

pa

pa

pauu««Hanm

aguoﬁqumﬁw

endowmﬁnwam

macaw

m

can:

9.3

9%

m.Hm

ado: .&amp;B

~.m

o.ma

so:

”om“

G3
nonu
naasmnu

9%

Hoe.

uonuhmmanwaamnm

madamnH.amm

nacho

m.m

Rama»
mm

-onohnm.emm

mgauon»

ammumnp

*

**
K

***

�-

-

7

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign born patients

than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group being highest of
Among

the foreign born patients, those

who came from

all.

Eastern European countries

received somatic therapy predominantly, while the majority of those from Western
Europe reneived psychotherapy alone.

II.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation
The

to Diagnosis:

diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable

to those reported in previous studies of the hospital population (12).

Of

the

fl72 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as psychotic depression,
32

as psychoneurosis and two with other diagnoses.

portion of the depressed patients
with other diagnoses.

To

(52%)

As

expected, a larger pro-

received electroshock than did those

control for the factor of diagnosis in choice or

treatment, the psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those
received electroshock and those
are

shown

who

were given psychotherapy alone.

.02

The

results

in Table II.
While the two groups were comparable

shock

who

patients had a

much

level of confidence.

higher

It is

mean F

for

age and education, the

electro-

score, a difference significant at the

also demonstrated that a significantly higher

proportion of the electroshock patients were born in Eastern Europe.

�‘hmavo

aﬁmv

as:

a

a

Agmmv

:83

nunwm

no

nnmpmmm

muonsm

ma

unusuauua

m
#moi

madam

Aﬁmmv

mo

m&gt;apaz

333
u,

whom

ma

NN

mm

mumwa

0903

$8

anoumhuwn

Aaawv.wm
.usdm

no

w
Mo
cwbaoumm

mm
Pm...”

m
Ammmv

mama»
soamm

3?:

u

m

a

NN

3.:

a

p

cams.

m.o~

0.2

am

:.mH

.92

spas

gum:

0.0:

9S

mpnuupdm

am

0a:
HH
.ust

IQ-

mm

mama
noummohmmn

no
uuaow

$03

.MHS

p

canonohmm

mad

omd

mN.o

mmm.

m.ma

{3

m.om

0.3

9602

33.3

v

No.0

*m:.m

muoom

mo

m
can:

502

.935

0N6
Hm&gt;oH

nomuhdmaco

mo.

pa

as

pnwowgﬁamum

namv

3203393
-ongmmm.amm

hmdhmﬁ.

9mm

b

it;

*

�-9.
III.

Comparison of Electroshock

Patients According to Length of Hospitalization

Prior to Treatment:
While the electroshock
from those

receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there

intra-group differences.
postulated that the

To account

While most of the

less than three

months

for

some

were

who

EST

scores and were older were treated
Place of birth

h0%

months were born

earlier than the

is also a significant factor.

cance, although

28%

in the U.S.

The

were

also

compared according

Patients

who had

on

higher

younger and lower F scale
While hh% of those

all patients referred after
data

was

referred after a period

were

III the patients are

within three months were foreign born,

six

it

were placed on treatment

to the period of hospitalization prior to electroshock.

groups.

considerable

of these differences

received

after admission, about
In Table

to differ

patient was referred for electro-

which a given

patients

of three to twelve months.

F

still

shown

factors involved in selection of treatment

same

related to the readiness with
shock.

patients, as a group, have been

education Just

treated

a period of

fails of signifi-

of those treated earlier had less than eight years of

edu—

cation.
IV.

Use

of Adignctive Hospital Services:
Comparison of the

logical testing is

shown

patients referred for creative therapy

in Table

IV.

It is clear that

of these procedures had significantly lower
more education and more were

for these services.

F

and psycho~

those referred for either

scores, were younger_in age, had

native born than patients

who were

not referred

�.350

Agmv

m

Agmmv

nuHHm

cumwmmm

0935

Mo

NH

o

o

haemv

o

m
*ma.m

pamapmmne

madam

0p

“away

Aﬁowv

ma

w

AgooHv

u

m&gt;wuwz

anon

Ha

N

x

nownm

933
Ammuv

Aﬁomv

mm

m

no

m

mo
noﬁpduwawpwmmom

Aaooav

HH

maﬁpwuscm

made»

w

mm.:

0

Agmmv

Agoav

m

H

an

&gt;.m

m.m

o.m

gm:

m.m

».ad

m.mH

333

mo

a

N

x

HHH
nnwan
'0‘"-

no

mqm¢9

on

p

aw.”

mm.o

mm.o

aoavmosu

mama»

cams

mm.H

.Muaa

Hm.a

Po.nw*wm.m
mnwcnoou&lt;

am

m.ma

m.ma

m.oa

30E

m.m;

w.mm

H.om

u

FH.H

Hw.H

mm¢
Hp.m
mpqmwgwm

m~.m

swag».meg

‘

~:.mnwrmw.m

mm

9mm

o.:a

w.HH

a

m.~H

mm.a

mm.a

,

_

macaw

mo

m

new:

H.a:

~.N:

m.mm

mama

.Mqu

m:.m

m~.m

ma.ma

nomwuwmaco

ncwpcuﬁawpunmom

.moa

Hmpmﬂ

mo.

Ho.

pa

96

AHHV

Ammv

angdwha

Hm&gt;oH

Aoﬂv

.mos

:

u

.moa

.woa

.noa

.moa

n

m
mo

nvmumq

m

m

.moa

on

nova

gang

swap

mama

w

m
0p

m

mama

can»

pnaowwﬂnmﬁm

pqaoﬁmﬁnmﬁm

nun»

can»

m
on
mama

m

m
.moa

on
mnoz

mama

mm
.moa

whoa

«nos

m

*

**

�nmnpo

hmmnmna

$8

Away

m

m

Asmav

m

Aamv

m

npuwm

a3

Amwmv

Aﬁmv

cnmpmdm

#

muonsm

m&gt;wpwmuo

A

mo

mm

Aﬁmav

ma
*mm.m

*mm.®

$3

mqwam

cam

hﬁmwv

Agapv

Aﬁmpv

u

u
m&gt;w¢dz

upon

mwﬁpmme

3

a»

ﬂame

Amway

Aapmv

“*pmv

8

mm

my

mm

MN

am

H»

«x

whoa

no
Haowwoaonommm

m

mo

*mm.:

mowpmosum

*mm.m
mndow

m

mo

soamm

:5

Awmav

Aﬁmv

a

A$MHV

n

H

ma

mtm

H.:

Nx

m

«x

ma

&gt;H

p

mwuw&gt;hmm

am

IHHI
mgm¢H

m.m

mm.m

mo

***&gt;.m

m».H

aowpwuscm

mama;

can;

3;

aw

v.0“

«.mH

m.HH

m&gt;ﬁponmmd¢

m.mw**om.:

mm

no“

O.H

h%ﬁ

add

m.ma

5mm

m.mm

m.HH

p

:.ma

mm.m

om¢

o.&gt;
cams.

p.0m

p.»m

mam:

.men

H.oa***mm.m

a

dmunmwmm

am

3:

m.m~

cum:

9mm

p.m:

w.:~

m.ma

r*wm.m

choom

mgqmwpwm

m

H.mm

$.H:

can:

.umﬁn

m.w

m.:a

rm&gt;¢r
amped

Ho&gt;oa

mo
mo. Ho.

:8

pa pa pa

amoavhmanona

Appv

newwnwmabo

3239
mumua

«CC.

Ammv

.a.o
pnmUHuHamHm

pacuHMwumHm

*

**

HQNUﬁMHanm

oz

mmsouo

.Hoaohmm

m&gt;wpmmuo

mummy

:.Honommm

8385

.Honoamm

oz

oz

.a.o

oz

***

�DISCUSSlON:

results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of birth

The

and F

scale score

were

significantly related to the type of therapy received

and

to the utilization of adjunctive services in this hospital.

Psychotherapy was

the treatment of choice for those patients

better educated,

native born

and had lower F scores.

Such

who were younger,

patients

were

also referred

more

frequently for the auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and
creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores,
were

older, poorly educated

were most

likely to

be

and foreign born,

referred for

EST.

particularly in Eastern Europe,

These

patients

infrequently

were

referred for psychological tests or for creative therapy. Furthermore, these
relationships

were

still

significant when diagnosis

was

held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of Hbllingshead, Redlich
and

their co-workers (3, 5, 6, 13,

15) who demonstrated

related to the type of therapy received in a

community.

that social factors are
The

present study

demonstrates that such factors are also significant in a hospital setting where

ability to pay is not a criteria of therapeutic selection and
of therapy are equally available to the
With

financial aspects

and the

where

all

forms

entire population.
availability of therapeutic facilities

eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the selection
of treatment, two alternative interpretations

factors

may

of therapy.

may be

considered.

The

social

relate directly to the empirically established criteria for choice
On

this basis a patient is referred for electroshock because

older, poorly educated or foreign born, clinical experience having

shown

he

that

is

�such persons respond best to
adequate since

13

-

this type of treatment. This explanation is in-

half the patients with psychotic depression received psychotherapy

alone, even though electroshock

is generally considered the treatment of choice

for this illness.
An

alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to

‘choice of treatment because they

also affect certain psychological patterns of

behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy, such as

mode

of

communi-

cation. Thus, a patient is not referred for electroshock because he is foreign
born or poorly educated, but

rather, these factors provide the difference in

cultural background between patient

and

therapist

which makes successful communi»

cation less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship.

Robinson 33 EE' (15)

in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that psychotherapy is
most

likely to take place

where the

cultural background of the patient is similar

to that of the therapist. Conversely, patient-therapist differences in systems
of value and communication may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic rela-

tionship. In the present study, similarly, the patients

who

received psycho-

therapy alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors studied.*
Apart from the problem of

patient-therapist differences, certain patterns

of communication exhibited by the patient may be

intrinsically incompatible with

the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have

score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9.
Sixteen percent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education
was over 20.

* The 18

therapists had a

mean F

�-1ushown

that verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy

and use of cliches are

patterns appear to be

likely to receive electroshock (7, 8).
more frequent

Such language

in persons with poorer socio-cultural back-

grounds.

Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect on

cation patterns,

that,

has noted

may

communi~

also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler (11)
patients diagnosed as schizophrenic, differences in

among

symptoms

are related to differences in cultural background. Frank gg'gl. (2), studying
psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose

symptoms were

expressed

in somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those
mained had

ideational

shock patients (8)

we

In a study of personality factors in electro-

have noted

that certain patterns of symbolic value

The F scale

and

likely to be associated with the development of a
The

indicates that

symptoms

re-

symptoms.

communication were more

depressive psychosis.

who

relationship between communication pattern

symptoms themselves

are a

mode

and

of communication.

furnishes a quantifiable index of attitude and communication

patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers were less receptive to entering a
psychotherapeutic relationship and were more likely to receive electroshock.
Tougas (17), using an

ethocentric scale similar to the

F

scale, found that

psychotherapy was more effective in patients with low scores.

study the

F

scale

was

In the present

the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment

groups.
These

results have clinical as well as theoretical significance.

�-

15

-

Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that lowbscorers on
the

F

scale have a poor response to electroshock,

and

that those with high

F

scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone. Another clinical application
may be

in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient.

This may be done by minimizing

closely for

age and place of

necessity for developing new

their social differences,

by matching them more

birth. 0f possible greater importance is the
modes

of communication when treating patients

who

are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic approaches.*
While epidemiological

studies have clearly structured

some

of the

problems involved in selection of treatment, and have indicated the direction

of further study,

it still remains

for

more process~oriented

definitive answers.

* See Esecover's

presentation of this topic in this issue.

research to provide

�-

16

-

SUMMARY:

1.

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection

of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which

all

forms of therapy were

equally available, education, age, place of birth and score on the California
F

scale were significantly related to the type of therapy received and to the

utilization of adJunctive hospital services.
2. Patients
and were
be

who were

older, poorly educated, had higher

foreign born, particularly in Eastern Europe,

referred for electroshock.

those patients

who most

were most

F

scores

likely to

Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for

closely resembled the therapist in these aspects.
were present even when diagnosis was held

3.

These

relationships

h.

Among

the electroshock patients the

constant.
significant in choice of therapy
which a

patient
5.

was

It is

were

same

factors found to be

also related to the readiness with

referred for electroshock.
postulated that treatment selection is the result of the

communicative interaction between patient and
be important insofar as they are

therapist. Social factors

may

related to different modes of communication.

�-

17

-

REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., FrankeloBrunswik,

(1950):
&amp;

The

E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,

Authoritarian Personality,

New

R.N.

York: Harper

Brothers.

Frank, J.D., Gliedman, L.H., Imber, S.D., Nash, E.H. and Stone, A.R.
(1957):

Why

Neurol.

Am.

Leave Psychotherapy, A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat., 11; 283-299.

&amp;

Freedman, L.Z. and

Patients

Hollingsheadﬁj. (1957): Neurosis

J. Psychiat.,

Hillside Hospital, 29th

113: 769-775.

Annual Report, 1956.

Schizophrenia and Social

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Structure,

Am.

and Social Class,

J. Psychiat.,

110: 695-701.

Social Class and Psychiatric

Ecllingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Disorders, in Interrelations Between the Social Environment
and

Psychiatric Disorders,

New

York:

Milbank MEmorial Fund,

pp. 195-208.
-3

Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

Therapy.
Zubin,

M.

(1957):

Changes

in

Language During Electroshock

In Psychopathology of Communication (Roch, P. and

J. Eds.),

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

New

York: Grune

&amp;

Stratton.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol., in press.
Levinson, D.J.:
10.

Personal Communication.

Morgan, N.C. and Johnson, N.A. (1957):

Chronic Hospital Patient,

Am.

Failures in Psychiatry:

J. Psychiat.,

The

113: 82h-830.

�-18.
REIFEEENCES

ll.

Opler,

Schizophrenia and Culture, Scientific American,

M.K. (1957):

..

191: 103-110.
12.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, 6.8., Gurvitz,
(1956):

ll}.

Redlich, F.C., Hollingshead, A.B., Roberts,

33.,

Robinson, H.A.,

KJ. (1953): Social Structure

and Psychiatric Disorders,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

ﬂ: 729-73h.

Rennie, T.A.C., Srole, L., Opler, M.K. and Langner, T.S. (1957):
Am.

Titus,

Psychiatric Treatment,

Am.

H.E. and Hollander, E.P. (1957):

Tougas, R.R. (19511):

Urban

J. Psxghia‘b” 3.3;: 831-837.

Robinson, H.A., Redlich, F.C. and Myers, J .K. (195M:

Psychological Research:
17.

Rachlin, L.

Freedman, L.Z. and Meyers,

and
16.

A. and

J. Hillside Hospital, 2: 17-40.

1950,

Life and Mental Health,
15.

Lurie,

Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from

Hillside Hospital in
13.

14.,

Social Structure

J. Orthopsychiat., g5: 307-316.
The

California

F Scale

1950—1955, P331301. Bu11.,

Ethnocentrism as

8.

it:

in
147-64.

Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy,

In Psychotheragy and Personality Change, C.R. Rogers and R.F.
Dymond,

18.

Zierer,

E. and

eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. l96-21h.

Zierer,

E. (1956):

of Creative Activity,

Am.

Structure

and Therapeutic

J. Psychotherapy, i3:

Utilization

11833519.

�-

19

-

APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM

Below are a number of statements.

For each statement

we

want you to

give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree. Answer each

statement according to one of the following:

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY

I

AGREE A

I
I

LITTLE

1.

No

MUCH

MUCH

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a

close friend or relation.
2.

Science has

its place,

but there are

many

important things that

must always be beyond human understanding.
3.

If

people would

talk less

and work more, everybody would be

better off.
h.
think about
5.

ation,

When

it,

6.

the youth needs most is

will to

wOrk and

is best for

strict discipline,

fight for family

Nowadays when so many

much, a person has
an

it

him not

to

but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

What

and the

a person has a problem or worry,

rugged determin-

and country.

different kinds of people

mix

together

so

to protect himself especially carefully against catching

infection or disease

from them.

7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more than
mere imprisonment; such

criminals ought to be publicly whipped, or worse.

�-20..
8.

is to

The

best teacher or boss is the

be done and how

9.

the strong.

go about

to get over

them and

tells

us exactly what

it.

Young people sometimes

up they ought

10.

to

one who

get rebellious ideas, but as they

settle

grow

down.

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak and

�Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization. Discharge Ratings. and Diagnosis

ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK. Ph.D..
AND

MAX FINK. M.D.
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry
December 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565—574
Copyright 1959, by American Medical Association

Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings, and Diagnosis
ROBERT L. KAHN,

Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D., and MAX FINK, M.D., Glen Oaks, N.Y.

The increasing studies of the sociopsy—
chological aspects of psychiatric treatment
in recent years have primarily been concerned with treatment patterns in the community,12 private practice,29 and outpatient
clinics.24'2” In the studies reported by
Hollingshead, Redlich, and their co—work—
ers ”'27 it was found that social class was
a major determinant of the type of psy—
chiatric treatment in the New Haven com—
munity. Patients from the upper classes
were more frequently treated with psycho—
therapy, while somatic or custodial care was
commoner among the lower classes. They
summarized their results by noting: “It was
found that treatment does not depend on
psychological and medical determinants
alone, but on the status position of the pa27
well.”
tient as
Weinstock,29 reporting the
results of a poll of the American Psycho—
analytic Association, observed that the pa—
tients being treated by their members in
private practice came disproportionately
from the better—educated, high-income pop—
ulation.
Similar ﬁndings have been noted in
studies of outpatient facilities. Myers and
Schaffer 2" showed that the higher a per—
son’s social class the more likely he was to
be accepted for psychotherapy, treated by
more highly trained personnel, and treated
intensively over a long period of time. In
another study Rosenthal and Frank 28
Submitted for publication April 16, 1959.
From the Department of Experimental Psychia—
try, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by Grants M-927 and MY-2092,
National Institute of Mental Health, National In~
stitutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

found almost a linear relationship between
educational level and frequency of referral
for psychotherapy.
A more critical test of the importance
of sociopsychologic factors in relation to
psychiatric treatment would be in a setting
where the same therapeutic techniques and
services were equally available to all patients. This requirement is met at Hillside
Hospital, which is a nonproﬁt institution for
the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable symptoms,” 11 who are
admitted regardless of their ability to pay.
One of the main criteria for accepting pa—
tients is their “ability to participate proﬁt—
ably in psychotherapy.” 11
Individual
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is
regarded as the primary method of treatment, with physiodynamic therapies available when needed. The average length of
hospital stay is seven months, although
some patients stay for more than a year.
In a previous study of the Hillside Hos—
pital population,“ it was shown that the
factors of age, education, place of birth,
and degree of stereotypy, as measured by
the California F Scale,1 were related to the
selection of therapy. Those patients who
were older, had less education, were
foreign-born, and had high scores on the F
Scale were more likely to receive convulsive
therapy. In contrast, patients who were
younger, better—educated, and native—born
and obtained low scores on the F Scale re—
ceived psychotherapy as their sole form of
treatment.
The purpose of the present study was to
determine the relation of sociopsychological
27/565

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

factors to (1) the duration of hospitaliza—
tion, (2) the clinical evaluations at time of
discharge, and (3) the ﬁnal diagnosis.

Population

Method
Population—The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside Hospital on March 7, 1957, was
studied. This consisted of 171 patients, 57 male and
114 female, ranging in age from 16 to 68 years,
with a mean of 35 years.
Procedura—The patients were divided according

to the duration of hospitalization, clinical response
to treatment, and diagnosis. The duration was de—
termined by the number of complete months in the
hospital. The clinical response and the diagnosis
were determined by the medical director at a staff
evaluation conference, usually held just prior to the
patient’s discharge. Each patient was rated as
recovered, much improved, improved, or unim—
proved on the basis of the reports of the therapist,
supervising psychiatrist, and milieu staff. The
discharge diagnoses were divided into four major
groups: involutional psychosis, manic—depressive
psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychoneurosis. These
diagnostic categories included all but three patients
in the population.
Each patient was tested with a lO—item modiﬁcation of the California F Scale.20 The F
Scale is a questionnaire which has been related to
such factors as authoritarianism, acquiescence,
ethnocentrism, and rigidity.1 The subject reads 10
statements and indicates to what extent he agrees
or disagrees with each, i.e., “a little,” “pretty
much,” or “very much.” The score for each item
ranges from 1 to 7, and the total score range is
10 to 70. High scores indicate greater agreement
with the statements. These are extreme, uncritical,
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one state—
ment is this: “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”

1.

Results
Length of Hospitalization—In this

population the duration of hospitalization
ranged from 1 to 16 months, With a median
of 7 months. For the purpose of analysis,
the population was divided into three
groups: 49 patients who were hospitalized
for 1 to 5 months; 64, for 6 to 9 months,
and 58 for 10 or more months.
The relation of sociopsychological factors
to the length of hospitalization is shown in
Table l. The group of patients who were
hospitalized for the shortest period had
28/566

1.—Dnration of Hospitalization: Total

TABLE

Months in
Hospital

No.

to 5
to 9
or more

49
04
58

1

6
10

F Score.
Mean
43.9

Age,

Mean
Yr.
45.5
32.5
27.9

40.1

31.0

Education.
Mean
Yr.

ForeignBorn

10.0
11.9
12.8

41%
19%
10%

x’=l5.0 I
Moan

Mean

Diﬁ'i r-

Diﬁ‘eiences

Differences

13.0

§

1.9

T

§

ences

to 1‘s.
l to 5 vs.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
1

0

lo

10
10

9

3.4

Mean

or
12.9

§

17.6

§

2.8

9.5

§

4.6

*

0.9

or

P&lt;0.05.
t P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

the highest mean F scores, were oldest, and
had the least education and the largest per—
centage of foreign—born. Conversely, the
group in the hospital for 10 months or more
had the lowest F scores, were youngest, and
had the most education and the smallest
percentage of foreign births. Patients who
were hospitalized for an intermediate period
fell in beLween these two groups for each
of the factors.
When the data for those patients who re—
ceived convulsive therapy (Table 2) and
those who received psychotherapy (Table
.3) as their only form of treatment were
analyzed separately, similar relationships
between sociopsychological factors and
length of hospitalization were found within
each group.
In the psychotherapy group there was an
increase in mean years of education with
greater months of hospitalization, but the
differences fail of signiﬁcance. It may be
noted, however, that many of the patients
who were in the hospital for 10 months or
more were under 19 years of age and were
thus unable to achieve more than a limited
number of years of schooling.
These same relationships of sociopsychological factors to length of hospitalization
were found when the patients were classiVol. 1,

Dec, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

2.—Dnration of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Convnlswe Therapy

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
No. Mean

to 5
6 to 9
10 or more

15

1

to 5 vs.
1 to 5 vs.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
1

“
T

1
§

17
25

to 9
10 or

6

58.2
45.6
34.9

.

Mean
Yr.
51.7
42.2
32.1

Yr.

Born

6.5
12.3
13.2

67%
24%
16%
x2=12.0 I

Mean
Diﬁer-

ences

ences

ences

12.61

9.5 ‘

5.81

1

of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Psychotherapy Only

Education,
Mean
Foreign-

Mean
Diﬁer-

Months in
_

1

6
10

or

§

19.6

§

*

10.1

t

NO-

t0 5
to 9
or more

33
43

6.7

to 5 (is.
to 5 vs.
more
to 9123.
more

1

*

11-4
11.7
12.4

30%
16%
8%

Mean

to 9
10 or
6

1.6
12,4

10

*

Diﬂ‘er-

Differ—

ences

ences

14.1

*

0.3

18.4

*

1.0

or
10.8

Mean

4.3

0.7

.

.
almost
deﬁnlte,
a
hnear, relat1onsh1p be—
tween the ratings of improvement and these
factors. Patients in the recovered group
had the highest F scores, were oldest, least
educated, and showed the highest incidence
of foreign birth. In contrast, patients in
the unimproved group had the lowest F
scores, were younger, better educated, and
were mostly native—born. Because of the
wide variability within each group, however,
only the factor of age reached a level of
statistical signiﬁcance. Education also sig—
niﬁcantly differentiated the groups when
dichotomized according to those who had
less than eight years of education and those
who had eight years or more. Of the re—
covered patients, 29% had less than eight

IS

TABLE

43-2
29.1
24-8

ForeignBorn

P=0.001.

.

ﬁed according to four major diagnostic
groups (Table 4). For each diagnostic
class, the lowest F scores, youngest mean
ages, most years of education, and least
percentages of foreign—born were characteristic of patients hospitalized for the longest
periods. As a group, patients diagnosed
as schizophrenic were the most homoge—
neous in relation to time in the hospital,
showing major differences only in the F
score, without a consistent trend for the
factors of education or place of birth.
2. Results of Treatment—The relation
of sociopsychological factors to evaluation
on discharge is shown in Table 5. There

40-2
38-6
27-8

Differences

0.9

p&lt;omL

Mean
Yr.

Mean

§

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
P&lt;0.01.

F Score,
Mean

Education,
Mean
Yr.

26

Mean
Diﬂer-

6

10.7

HOSDltal

Age,

x’=5.4

1

23.3
10

Age,

TABLE 3.——Dui*a_tion

_

_

4.—Duration of Hospitalization in Patients Classiﬁed According to Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

Involutional psychosis ___________________

1-5

58.2
50.9
35.0

58.8
54.5
52.3

9.6
16.0

40.0
46.1
33.1

46.8
39.1
35.5

11.0
11.7
12.3

39%
23%

40.1
36.6
36.1

41.0
27.1
27.1

8.7
12.5
12.5

50%
19%
13%

36.3
38.5
27.6

27.8
27.8
24.1

13.3
12.3
12.9

10%

‘

6—9

10+
Manic-depressive psychosis

..............

1-5
6-9

10+
Psychoneurosis

...........................

1-5
6—9

10+
Schizophrenia

............................

1-5
6—9

10+

Kahn et al.

Age,

Education,
Mean Yr.
7.1

Foreign-Born
57%
43%
0

0

8%
12%

39/ 567

�M
a?

A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

TABLE

Evaluation

...............................
..........................
................................
.............................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved
Unimproved

5.—Discharge Evaluation

No.
17

82
63
9

F Score,
Mean
42.9
39.0
36.1
31.1

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

44.5
35.6
31.2
31.1

10.7
11.2
11.2
13.2

41%
22%
16%
11 %

x 2=6.1

Mean

Differences

Recovered vs. Much Improved
Recovered vs. Improved
Recovered vs. Unimproved

.............................
....................................
.................................
Much Improved 08. Improved
.............................
Much Improved vs. Unimproved
...........................
Improved vs. Unimproved
.................................

3.9
6.8
11.8
2.9
7.9
5.0

Mean
Differences
8.9 *
13.3 I
13.4

4.4
4.5
0.1

*

T

Mean
Diﬂ'erences
0.5
0.5
2.5
0.0
2.0
2.0

' P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
t P&lt;0.01.
1‘

years’ education, while all of the unimproved
patients had more than eight years’ educa—
tion; the much improved and improved pa—
tients were in between. By X2—analysis
these results were signiﬁcant at the 5%
level of conﬁdence.
When the data were analyzed for the
patients treated with convulsive therapy, the
trends noted for the population as a whole
were intensiﬁed (Table 6). Analysis of the
patients who received psychotherapy as
their only form of treatment (Table 7),
however, failed to show any statistically
signiﬁcant pattern. The recovered patients
were oldest and had the highest percentage
of foreign births, but education and F score
did not show any clear trend.
TABLE

3. Diagnosis.~—The relation of sociopsy-

chological factors to diagnosis is shown in
Table 8. Those patients classiﬁed as show—
ing involutional reactions had the highest
F scores, the oldest mean age, the least
years of education, and the highest inci—
dence of foreign birth. In contrast, pa—
tients classiﬁed as schizophrenic had the
lowest F scores, the youngest mean age, the
most years of education, and the least num—
ber of foreign—born. Patients classed in
manic—depressive psychosis and psycho—
neurosis categories were in between with
regard to these social factors.

Comment
The present study has demonstrated that

sociopsychological

factors, in addition to

6.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving Convnlsive Therapy

Evaluation

N 0.

F Score,
Mean

Recovered _______________________________
Much improved __________________________
Improved and unimproved _______________

8
26
23

53.1
41.8
39.7

Mean
Differences

Recovered vs. much improved ______________________________
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved___________________
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved _____________

11.3
13.4 ‘
2.1

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

51.6
43.8
32.3

9.4
10.6
12.3

Mean

Foreign-Born
50%
35%
17%
x *=3.5

Differences

Mean
Diﬁerences

7.8
19.3 I
11.5 t

1.2
2.9
1.7

*

’ P&lt;0.05.

P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.001.
’r

30/568

Vol. 1,

Dec,

1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE 7.——Discharge

Evaluation in Patients Receiving Psychotherapy Only
F Score,
Mean

N 0.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved and unimproved ...............

54

32-6
38.1

39

33.5

9

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

38.2
32.2
31.9

12.3
12.0
12.2

33%
15%
18%

x '= 1.8
Mean
Differences

..............................
...................
.............

Recovered us. much improved
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved

5.5
0.9
4.6

their previously determined importance in
the selection of treatment, are also signiﬁcantly related to the duration of treatment,
the evaluation of the results of treatment,
and the psychiatric diagnosis. If such results were obtained in a survey of private
practitioners, as in the Weinstock report,29
it could be concluded that the limitation of
the number of practitioners and the expense
of treatment served to select preferred persons from the upper social classes who
could afford the treatment in terms of time
and money. The present results, however,
were obtained in an institution where the
various kinds of'treatment were equally
available to all patients and where the ability
to pay was not a factor in the management
of the patient. We postulate, therefore, that
TABLE

Mean
Differences

Mean

Differences

6.0
6.3
0.3

0.3
0.1
0.2

the observed relationships are not due
merely to mechanically selective aspects,
such as income or the prestige status of the
patient. Social factors are important because they are also related to psychological
processes, such as the habitual patterns of
communication, modes of expression, and
symbolic values. We shall attempt to
evaluate these processes and their effect on
the psychiatric relationships studied in
terms of the inﬂuence of sociopsychological
factors on the attitude and behavior of the
therapist, the patient, and the therapist-patient interaction.
Current data both from this laboratory 14
and from others 12'24’27'28 have demon—
strated that psychotherapy is most likely
to be sustained with those persons who most

8,—Diagnosis

Diagnosis

N 0.

F Score,
Mean

Involutional psychosis ___________________
Manic-Depressive psychosis ______________
Psychoneurosis ___________________________
Schizophrenia ____________________________

24
39
37
68

52.3
40.8
36.9
32.8

Age,

Mean Yr.
56.7
41.9
29.4
26.1

Education,
Mean Yr.
8.9

,

11.5
11.9
12.7

Foreign~Born
46%
26%
22%
10%

x’=14.2 I
Mean

Involutional vs. Manic-depressive psychosis
................
Involutional psychosis vs. psychoneurosis __________________
Involutional as. schizophrenia ______________________________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. psychoneurosis _____________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. schizophrenia_______________
Psychoneurosis vs. schizophrenia ___________________________

Mean

Mean

Differences

Differences

Differences

11.5 I
15.4 I
19.5 §

14.8
27.3

§

30.6

§

3.9
8.0
4.1

12.5
15.8
3.1

§

2.0 ‘
3.0 I
4.5 §
0.4
1.6
0.8

T

§

§

P&lt;0.05.
T P&lt;0.02.
1 P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

Kahn et al

31/569

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

closely resemble the therapists with regard
to cultural' background, systems of value,
and communication patterns. With stress at
Hillside Hospital on psychoanalytically
oriented psychotherapy, it is consistent that
those patients who are most like the
therapists with regard to these factors would
be kept in the hospital for the longest
period. This was true for patients receiving
convulsive therapy or psychotherapy and
for all diagnostic groups.
The length of time a patient remains in
a psychiatric facility is related to the par—
ticular function and philosophy of the insti—
tution. In studies of outpatient clinics
which have a psychoanalytic orientation 24,28
it has been observed that persons from the
higher social classes, determined by educa—
tion or income, are treated for a longer
period. In contrast, in state mental hospitals, patients with the least education are
kept longer and form a higher proportion
of the chronically hospitalized groupfi'l'ﬁ23
The state—hospital therapist, viewing the in—
stitution primarily as a custodial facility,12
is evidently oriented toward the more rapid
discharge of those patients who come from
a background most like his own.
The observation of the relation between
sociopsychological factors and improvement
rating, particularly in those patients receiving convulsive therapy, may also be related
to differences in communication patterns
between therapist and patient that result in
referral for convulsive therapy. The
therapist may set different criteria for im—
provement for theolder, less educated pa—
tients than he does for the younger, more
sophisticated ones. In the patient with littl/
education and with modes of expression
different from his own, he may regard, for
example, the manifestation of denial or
minimization of symptoms as improvement.15 But in patients culturally like him—
self, the expression of denial is regarded
as a defensive operation, and the patient is
considered unimproved.
Ratings of improvement are also related
to the base line of premorbid functioning.
32/570

.

Thus, the rating of recovered is deﬁned at
Hillside Hospital as “the reasonable ex—
pectation that the patient will be able to
return to his community and function as
well, or better, than he did before he became
ill.” 11 The therapist’s perception of the
patient’s premorbid functioning may be inﬂuenced by the distance between his value
system and that of the patient’s. The greater
the social distance between therapist and
patient the less rigorous the requirements
for behavioral change may be. For ex—
ample, for older, lower—class patients the
ability to resume work may be the major
criterion of improvement. For bettereducated patients work adjustment may be
one of many criteria, including such intangible aspects of behavior as insight, work
gratiﬁcation, and ease of sociability. The
patient’s expectancy not only of the type
of psychiatric treatment but of improvement is also dependent upon social back—

ground.12

While the same trends were shown in the
psychotherapy patients, the results did not
reach the level of statistical signiﬁcance.
This may have been due to the greater
homogeneity of these patients for the
factors studied, in contrast to the convul—
sive group. The outpatient study by
Rosenthal and Frank 28 also failed to ﬁnd a
relation between social factors and improve—
ment rating in the patients who received
psychotherapy. This observation, also,
was obtained in a population that was more
homogeneous after the initial admission
selection process and after the spontaneous
screening effected by the patient’s willing—
ness to attend treatment after he had been
accepted.

The marked relationship between socio—
psychological factors and diagnosis is not
surprising. Certainly, the relationship of
age and diagnosis is an established concept
in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional
disorders and in dementia precox the names
themselves have a chronological connota—
tion. Landis and Page,19 in 1938, stated that
age was the “most important single deter—
Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

.

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

mining factor that we can know about men—
tal disease.” They asserted that, given the
age distribution of a group of patients, they
could accurately predict the number in each
diagnostic group, as well as the probable
outcome with respect to recovery and the
length of hospital residence. More recently,
Frumkin,8 reporting the median ages of ﬁrst
admissions to a mental hospital in Ohio,
observed data similar to our own with re—
gard to the ages for the various diagnostic
groups.
In the .present study, however, we have
also shown that education, place of birth,
and F score signiﬁcantly differentiate the
major diagnostic groups in the hospital. In
View of these ﬁndings, we have postulated
that a psychiatric diagnosis is not just a
one—to—one reﬂection of a speciﬁc type of
behavior pattern but is also a value judgment in terms of social interaction. Thus,
both in our own studies and in the work of
12
it has been noted that patients
others
with similar symptoms will receive different
diagnoses, depending on their social background.
An additional hypothesis relating socio~
psychologic factors to diagnosis may be
based on the concept that persons from dif—
ferent social backgrounds acquire different
habitual modes of adaptation, communica—
tion, and expression. Accordingly, under
conditions of stress, altered brain function,
or states associated with the onset of mental
illness, a person will show those behavior
patterns or symptoms which are similar to
his habitual patterns. Thus, persons from a
lower-class social background are more apt
to communicate in nonverbal, physical
terms, while upper—class people are more
likely to do so in ideational and verbal
modes. Thus, anger may be expressed by
lower—class people by physical violence,
while persons from the upper classes are
more likely to resort to exhortation or argu—
ment.
Opler and Singer,25 studying schizo—
phrenic Irish and Italian patients in a
Veteran’s facility, found signiﬁcant difKahn et al.

ferences in the types of symptoms related
to cultural differences in the family backgrounds. Patients from Irish families in
which the active expression of emotions
were frowned upon and who had dominant,
overprotective mothers, were passive, compliant, and withdrawn, and were fearful of
anything which might separate them from
the protection of the hospital. Patients with
Italian family backgrounds that encouraged
free expression of emotion and who were
ruled by a dominant father, showed as—
saultive and destructive behavior, were difﬁ—
cult to manage, and were rebellious against
authority.
In a comparable study, Miller and Swan22 noted
that hospitalized schizophrenic
son
patients exhibited signiﬁcant social—class
difference in symptomatology. Lower-class
patients showed a predominance of “motoric themes,” while middle—class patients
exhibited “conceptual or r u m i n a t i v e
themes.”
Hollingshead and Redlich12 found a
marked difference in the type of neuroses
shown by persons from different social
classes. While hysterical reactions were
found predominantly at the lowest social
levels, obsessive—compulsive patterns were
characteristic of the upper classes. They
felt thatthe lower—class patient expresses
his neurosis by acting out, whereas the
upper—class neurotic shows his symptoms
in ideational dissatisfaction with himself.
According to our hypothesis, then, we
should expect that persons from lower
social levels would show symptoms that are
nonverbal, and are expressed predominantly
in sensory or motor patterns. Among such
types of symptoms Would be psychomotor
retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor,
muteness, hysterical blindness, and paral—
ysis. In this connection it is noteworthy
that both hysteria and manic—depressive
psychosis have been reported on the wane
in the general populatio-n.2v4'8'10 This de—
crease, in our view, is related to the general
increase in educational level of the country
as a whole. One cannot, of course, ascribe
33/571

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom
in sexual matters; hysteria is commonest in
more poorly educated people, who are least
26 has
Rees
inhibited sexually.”6
reported
that those British soldiers who had hysterical symptoms in World War II were mainly
the mental defectives. He noted that
hysterical symptoms were related to intelli—
7
indi—
has
education.
and
Freyhan
gence
cated not only that the present clinical
patterns of hysteria are different from those
shown at the turn of the century but that
such schizophrenic manifestations as “cataleptic stupors, stereotypical motor peculiar—
ities, grandiose excitement, and violent
behavior” are difﬁcult to ﬁnd today. These
observations suggest that a sociopsycho—
logical framework can lead to the prediction
of future patterns of mental illness.
In our investigations of persons with de—
pressive psychoses, we have frequently
noted a pattern of premorbid behavior characterized by lack of imagination, creativity,
and introspective capacity, and by conven—
tionality and general rigidity.13 Similar
patterns have been reported by other
authors.3'5""21 We believe that a deprived
cultural background, such as that involving
little or no education, with the early years
spent in an illiterate environment with
meager cultural resources, is conducive to
the development of such a personality pat—
tern. When mentally disordered, such per—
sons react with the repertoire of behavior
patterns that we term “depression.”
It is important to keep in mind that while
the relationship between social factors and
the psychiatric aspects described is probably
applicable as a general principle, the speciﬁc
ﬁndings may vary in different settings or
institutions. For example, Hollingshead and
Redlich12 found that schizophrenia was a
diagnosis proportionately commoner among
the lower than among the upper classes,
while at Hillside Hospital the schizophrenic
patients had the highest education. This
discrepancy may be related to differences
in composition of the two populations, the
Hillside patients being drawn largely from
34/572

the middle-class groups, with relatively few
from the upper or lower social classes. In
Hillside Hospital the diagnosis of schizo—
phrenia may indicate an “interesting” pa—
tient, while in a state hospital population the
same diagnosis may represent a patient who
is “hopeless.”
From the perspectives developed in this
report, observations which are commonly
explained in motivational and “dynamic”
terms may also be understood in other
ways. Thus, some situations where a pa—
tient is said to be “hostile” or “resisting
psychotherapy” may reﬂect a problem in
communication between patient and ther—
apist, related to their differences in social
background.
It also is apparent that the social back—
ground of the majority of the mentally ill
paients is such as to make the current prac—
tice of universally employing a verbal, in—
sightful-oriented therapeutic approach a
difﬁcult, if not inappropriate, procedure.
The answer to the problem of how to treat
the vast number of mentally ill may be
not to train more and more psychother—
apists, but, rather, to develop therapeutic
techniques more suitable to the patient’s
own systems of value and communication.

Summary and Conclusions
Signiﬁcant relationships were found

be—

tween sociopsychological factors and dura—
tion of hospitalization, discharge evaluation,
and diagnosis in a voluntary mental hos—
pital.
Patients hospitalized for the shortest
period were oldest, had the least education,
were most likely to have been foreign—born,
and had the highest scores on the California
F Scale. Younger, native—born, more edu—
cated, and lower F—score patients were hos—
pitalized the longest.
The same relationship of these factors
to length of hospitalization was found
when analyses were made according to type
of treatment (convulsive therapy or psycho—
therapy) and diagnosis.
Discharge evaluations of improvement
were signiﬁcantly related to age, the older
'

.

Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

patients having the more favorable ratings.
Analysis of the data by type of treatment
demonstrated that patients rated as recovered or much improved after convulsive
therapy had the highest F scores, the least
education, and were most likely to be
foreign-born.
Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psychoneurosis were associated with lower F
scores, younger ages, more education, and
native birth. The older, less educated,
foreign—born, high-F-score patients were
most frequently classiﬁed under involutional or manic—depressive psychosis.
It is postulated that these relationships
reﬂect the inﬂuence of social background on
psychological processes, such as the habitual
patterns of communication, modes of expression, and symbolic values. These not
only contribute to the pattern of mental ill—
ness but affect all aspects of the patient—
therapist interaction.
Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263d St. (Dr. Fink).

REFERENCES
Adorno, T. W.; Frenkel-Brunswik, E.;
Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.: The
Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper &amp;
Brothers, 1950.
2. Arieti, S.: The Decline of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis: Its Signiﬁcance in the Light of Dynamic and Social Psychiatry, paper read at 113th
Annual Meeting of American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, 1957.
3. Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 76 :617-618,
1.

1956.
4. Chodoff,

P.: A Re-examination of Some

Aspects of Conversion Hysteria, Psychiatry 17:
75—81, 1954.

Cohen, M. B.; Baker, R; Cohen, R. A.;
Fromm—Reichmann, F., and Weigert, E.: An Intensive Study of 12 Cases of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiatry 17:103-137, 1954.
S.

H. W., and Meltzer, B. N.:
Predicting Length of Hospitalization of Mental
Patients, Am. J. Sociol. 52:123—131, 1946.
7. Freyhan, F. A.: The Impact of Somatic
Therapies on Course and Clinical Proﬁle of the
Schizophrenias, J. Clin. &amp; Exper. Psychopath. 19:
6.

Dunham,

195-201, 1958.

Frumkin, R. M.: Occupation and Major
Mental Disorders, in Mental Health and Mental
8.

Kahn et al.

Disorder, prepared by a committee of the Society
for Study of Social Problems, edited by A. M.
Rose, New York, W. W. Norton &amp; Company,

Inc., 1955, pp.

136—160.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The
Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Depression, Proceeding 42d Annual Meeting of
American Psychopathological Association, edited
by P. H. Hoch and J. Zubin, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952, pp. 199—209.
10. Harvey, W. A.: Changing Syndrome and
Culture: Recent Studies in Comparative Psychiatry,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat. 2:165—171, 1956.
11. Hillside Hospital: Twenty-Ninth Annual Report, 1956.
12. Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C.:
Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community
Study, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
13. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. Neuropsychiatry, to be published.
14. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
9.

216-228, 1957.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
Psychopathology of Communication, Proceedings
of 46th Annual Meeting of American Psychopathological Association, edited by P. H. Hoch and
J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1958.
16. Kinsey, A. C.; Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin,
C. 13.: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1948.
17. Kramer, M.; Goldstein, 11.; Israel, R. H.,
and Johnson, N. A.: A Historical Study of the
Disposition of First Admissions to a State Mental
Hospital, Public Health Monograph No. 32,
Government Printing Ofﬁce, 1955.
18. Kramer, K.; Pollack, E. S., and Redick,
R. W.; Studies of Incidence and Prevalence of
Hospitalized Mental Disorders in the United
States: Current Status and Future Goals, paper
read at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American
Psychopathological Association, New York, 1959.
19. Landis, C., and Page, J. D.: Modern
Society and Mental Disease, New York, Farrar &amp;
Rinehart, Inc., 1938.
20. Gallagher, E. B.; Levinson, D. J., and
Erlich, I.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics
of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric
Treatment, in The Patient and the Mental Hospital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D. J. Levinson, and
R. H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
21. Malamud, W.; Sands, S. L., and Malamud,
I.: The Involutional Psychoses: A Socio—Psychiatric Study, Psychosom. Med. 3:410—426, 1941.
22. Miller, D. R., and Swanson, G.: Defense
Against Conﬂict and Social Background, paper
15.

35/573

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

read as part of a symposium at the meeting of the
American Psychological Association, September,

Disorder, New York, Milbank Memorial Fund,

1953.
23.

A.; Redlich, F. C., and
Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric

Morgan, N. C., and Johnson, N. A.: Failures
in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient. Am.
J. Psychiat. 113 :824-830, 1957.
24. Myers, J. K., and Schaffer, L.: Social
Stratiﬁcation and Psychiatric Practice: A Study
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev. 19:
307-310, 1954.

25. Opler, M. K., and Singer, J.

L.: Ethnic

in Behavior and Psychopathology,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat 2:11-22, 1956.
26. Rees, J. R.: in discussion on paper by
Gruenberg, E. M., in Epidemiology of Mental
Differences

36/574

1950, pp. 51—52.
27. Robinson,

H.

Treatment, Am. J.

Orthopsychiat.

24:307—316,

1954.
28. Rosenthal, D., and

Frank, J. D.: The Fate
of Psychiatric Clinic Outpatients Assigned to
Psychotherapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 127 :330343, 1958.
29. Weinstock, H. 1.:

Report of the Central
Fact—Gathering Committee of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, paper read at the 48th
Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathological Association, New York, 1958.

Prénted and Published in the United States of America

��J. Hillside Hospital, 6:

216-228, 1957.

SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF
THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL
HOSPITAL1
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,2 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between
social class and psychiatric disorder with respect to type and incidence of mental illness (3, 5, 6, l3, l4), selection and maintenance of
treatment (2, 6, 15), and therapeutic outcome (10). The present
study is concerned with social factors in the selection of therapy in

voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich, and their coworkers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of New Haven was divided
into ﬁve social classes on the basis of weighted criteria of education,
occupation and place of residence. Of the residents who were under
psychiatric care, those from the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or
custodial care was more common among the lower classes. Of the
psychotherapies, psychoanalysis was entirely restricted to the two
upper groups. Social class was the predominant determinant of the
type of treatment selected even when the diagnosis was held constant. They summarize their results as follows: ". . . it is found that
treatment does not depend on psychological and medical determinants alone, but on the status position of the patient as well.
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high
a

1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. 8.
Public Health Service.
2Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital.
3Scnior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
4 Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
‘

216

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

217

‘

degree to the upper social levels. The data of this study would seem
to indicate that most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where
the background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist" (15).
It is possible to relate the results obtained from these community studies to such selective factors as the patient’s ﬁnancial resources or the extent and type of treatment facilities available. A
more critical test of the importance of social factors affecting choice
of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients.
This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital. It is a nonproﬁt,

k,

h

.

....-_.._...-.,...v.....

nonsectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental symptoms" (4), who are admitted regardless of their ability to pay. One of the main criteria for accepting patients is their “ability to participate proﬁtably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with organic therapies
available when needed. The average length of hospital stay is six
months, although some patients remain for as long as a year.
The present investigation is an outgrowth of several years of
study of electroshock therapy. In previous work it has been shown
that certain aspects of personality were signiﬁcantly related to patient selection and therapeutic efﬁcacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
electroshock patients differ from those receiving other forms of
treatment in, regard to cultural background, including such factors
as education and place of birth, and personality as measured by the
California F scale (1); secondly, whether these factors were also
related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.

mum

METHOD

Population: The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside
Hospital as of March 7, 1957 was studied. This constituted a total
of 172 patients, ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a mean of 34.6,
and including 58 men and 114 women.
Procedure: (1) The population was subdivided into three groups,
according to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy,
(b) insulin coma therapy, and (c) psychotherapy only.‘5
5All patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during ’hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data were included
in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

....

“.4.

na.

._‘....-..—._4.,_....—««...

.

gbnyw.

C)

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

218
(2)

birth.

The groups were compared for age, education and place of

(3) All patients were tested6 with a ten-item modiﬁcation of the
California F scale suggested by Levinson (9). The F scale is a questionnaire (see Appendix) which has been related to such factors as
authoritarianism, acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
The patient reads ten statements and indicates whether he agrees
or disagrees with each statement and to what extent. The score given
for each item ranges from one to seven and the total score range is
10 to 70. The greater the agreement the higher the score obtained.
The statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

(4) The population was subdivided in regard to utilization of
certain adjunctive services in the hospital. Among such services
available are group activities, occupational therapy, psychological
testing and creative therapy. The latter is a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a series of controlled painting procedures
which are considered to be analogies of life experience (18). Psychological testing and creative therapy were selected for this study because both require a speciﬁc referral from the therapist.
RESULTS

The data were analyzed as follows: (1) comparison of the treatment groups for age, education, F scale scores, and place of birth;
(2) comparison where diagnosis is held constant; (3) signiﬁcance of
length of hospitalization prior to treatment; and (4) comparison
between groups referred for adjunctive hospital services.
Comparison of Treatment Groups
For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard
deviations for the F scale scores, age and years of schooling are
presented in Table l. The EST group had higher F scores, was
older and had fewer years of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These differences were statistically
signiﬁcant for F score and age but failed to reach statistical signiﬁcance for education. The failure of years of education to differentiate the groups was due, in part, to the fact that the electroshock
1.

6As part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F
In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on March 7 their pretreatment scores were used in the statistical comparison
since it had been found that EST signiﬁcantly affects the score during treatment.
scale prior to treatment.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.850

:wmuuom

Eon

$5“

82m
39.7114?

$.32

o

ammokoh

we

219

55

..ﬁ.:namo

cwMuSh

.ummmﬁuom

omen”.—

ﬁamr:

$.85“

$83

:25
.PEaZ

x0
3::
3::

Eom

$.8va

$532

ﬁvawm

55m

mo

.minamo

82m

-ﬁmuuoh

Eon

@EE

$3“

ﬁmmIv

$.32

Agar:

:otugﬁm

985

.me

.3—

$.8va

now

.«o

0

.Ssnamo

.Eeum
988w

ﬂ
”55H.

K

$5; ax?

3?:

Gm

3. ea

mm

532

2: 2:

qﬁ

wzoﬁom

‘8.“

$336

6m

mow—mo?

“2253‘;

a
532

.59

...23

3

2,

N.—

o
o

.
~23»me

«I

m5.—

Gm

q:

3

2;.

n:

gm

3”

a

:32.
.8.”

mi

ed

3

ow&lt;

x0

532

:82

a5

n:

a
a

tantamwﬁcc

Gm

92

”.2

a:

mi.

3»

3m

.

:2.»

tmhd

£5
E2 BE

3::

38mm

532

:82

.En

3:

3

hm

any

.3.

8.

So.

a

an

3

38%?2.85:»; Esscma
.o&amp;u&gt;m&amp;.::=n=—

aozéemﬁ

335-5“

585-98—

-OH—U
smvhmm

$5.19

r7305

.53.:

uh

.382:

.

..

2..

�220

KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

group contained many foreign-born patients whose education was
difﬁcult to evaluate accurately. When treatment groups were subdivided into number of patients above and below eight years of
education, the difference was signiﬁcant at the .01 level. The insulin and psychotherapy groups did not differ statistically for any
of these factors.

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign-born
patients than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group
being highest of all. Among the foreign-born patients, those who
came from Eastern European countries received somatic therapy
predominantly, while the majority of those from Western Europe
received psychotherapy alone.
Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis
The diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable to those reported in previous studies of the hospital popution (12). Of the 172 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as
psychotic depression, 32 as psychoneurosis and 2 with other diagnoses. As expected, a larger proportion of the depressed patients
(52%) received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.
To control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the
psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those who received electroshock and those who were given psychotherapy alone.
The results are shown in Table 2.
While the two groups were comparable for age and education,
the electroshock patients had a much higher mean F score, a difference signiﬁcant at the .02 level of conﬁdence. It is also demonstrated
that a signiﬁcantly higher proportion of the electroshock patients
were born in Eastern Europe.

2.

Comparison of Electroshock Patients According to Length of
Hospitalization Prior to Treatment
While the electroshock patients, as a group, have been shown to
differ from those receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there were still
considerable intragroup differences. To account for some of these
differences it was postulated that the same factors involved in selection of treatment were also related to the readiness with which a
given patient was referred for electroshock. While most of the patients who received EST were placed on treatment less than three
months after admission, about 40 per cent were referred after a
period of three to twelve months. In Table 3 the patients are compared according to the period of hospitalization prior to electro3.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.550

$.23.

ax”:

5.3m

538mm
jigli‘l

EuEEEh

we

“Egan

$53”

«Rana—

.Sauamu

REE

Kc
.0332 50m

§$§

$53“

EOENN

§£Vmw

awash

208
39$me

a;

How

no
con—8.6m

938»
name
Bwamwunﬁ

exam;

15.3.

Gm

3.

3

532

3:

3:

Gm

wﬁ

n2

:32

3:.

9:.

Ga

3:

«.2

h :32

new

q:

wzogum

0:3

N
.vm

38C.
somnuﬁﬁum

we
mama?

:32

.

86

£5

85

utoﬁbﬁ

5.3»

a

mud

ow&lt;
582

a3

and

3:»..qu

kc

.

é.“

38m

:ontﬁwEoU

:32

ea

BE
3m

8.

«liq.

a
$6

.
‘
.

:3

Hammama
.oﬁrmémm

-onuwnm

ha.

,

.

2!!!!)

..

,

‘

W

7

832:

.

,1"

w

322:

,

221

�KAHN—POLLACK—FIN K

222

.,
.550

@va

c

o
sin

uo

.£6

.
33mg

583m uncuzm

$53

m

o

$53

ﬁgs:

a

:

Mano

cum—m
2.25355

-0322 50m

3

@932

3.2%
308

$.83
$5me

:

mm

new

“o
:otuggxwmom

QUE

:oumusvm

wweﬂamo

“26&gt;

w
Aﬁwua

32::

c

3015

kc
m
Ewnud

45

55H.

S

a

85

:2

85

£5

a:

8....

a;

9

:4

:3.”

3»

:82 .En

E...“

2.2

N:

ms:

a

8;

:3.“

5*

3...

Gm

5..

am

3..

38&gt; 582

am

hi

3.;

Gm

3:

mﬁ

2:

532

93

mg

Gm

q:

582

2:.

mo
can:

mEEouuV

Szuzcm

8..

uw&lt;

:3

Sam

\0

.

m3

38m

zowtuiEeU

h
mo

as

3

.88

him
-mNSSEmo:

52:

Susannah.

sum—SA

€3.88...

no:

4 w.

$04

,w

‘

8

e5

$6
kwoa

:2:

o

m

532

c:

m
Gan—u

.85
0.82

c

33

o2

2.2

e

2

»

.22

me.

8.

aa

-608

.88

~22

m
Ema—u

30..—

288

:2:

308

.85.

3

n

285:? 385:”;

52:

o

308

88¢

.

2.
.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

223

Shock. Patients who had higher F scores and were older were treated
earlier than the younger and lower F scale groups. Place of birth is
also a signiﬁcant factor. \Vhile 44 per cent of those treated within
three months were foreign-born, all patients referred after a period
of six months were born in the U. S. The data on education just
fails of signiﬁcance, although 28 per cent of those treated earlier
had less than eight years of education.

.,,.

,,

.

mug-r;

Adjunctive Hospital Services
Comparison of the patients referred for creative therapy and
psychological testing is shown in Table 4. It is clear that those referred for either of these procedures had Signiﬁcantly lower F scores,
were younger in age, had more education and more were nativeborn than patients who were not referred for these services.

4. Use of

DISCUSSION

..

"155'

.

,

The results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of
birth, and F scale score were signiﬁcantly related to the type of
therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive services‘ in this
hospital. Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for those patients who were younger, better educated, native-born and had lower
F scores. Such patients were also referred more frequently for the
auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores, were
older, poorly educated and foreign-born, particularly in Eastern
Europe, were most likely to be referred for EST. These patients
were infrequently referred for psychological tests or for creative
therapy. Furthermore, these relationships were still signiﬁcant when
diagnosis was held constant.
These observations are compatible with those of Hollingshead,
Redlich, and their co-workers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15) who demonstrated that
social factors are related to the type of therapy received in a community. The present study demonstrates that such factors are also
signiﬁcant in a hospital setting where ability to pay is not a criterion
of therapeutic selection and where all forms of therapy are equally
available to the entire population.
With ﬁnancial aspects and the availability of therapeutic facilities eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the
selection of treatment, two alternative interpretations maybe considered. The social factors may relate directly to the empirically
established criteria for choice of therapy. On this basis a patient is

'

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

224

.850

ﬁn“;

$me

Amwutch

35:30

533mm

«@055

A03:

Aﬁmwvmw

H

1%:

35:2

@33

@3:

@8va

§§8

.mwmuamo

«50

853

.25“

«:8

$63

.23

2:5

go

ARE;

50m

aways

$95:

$.38

138%

Z

MFGSK.

805

1%»

3w

.uo

H

~838va
PﬁmSaﬁbﬁ

.Nmenamu

mud“;

«Eu

3?:

$.27:

33“ $.32

Gm

ﬂ.

3

a.»

38&gt; 582

3:

2:

3“ N:

mic—om

kc

v
8.938%

.Um

35?

we

8.“

:82

a

octhd

£5

QN

m5

3

,

uptuzzbuv.

.

.Sx

2:

we

a:

E:

532

SN

3».

5.8

5.3

Gm

2:

”.2

a: 2:

3w

5.3

3»

ASV

32v

Gm

.tnowJ.

....ewm

"A:

S.

vw&lt;
Vutﬁwm

:8:

.

2:».zum

Kc

a5

tooomd

:8.”
~22

3,2

no.

8.

38m

h

582
532

£5
Nﬁu

«.3.

2

:32

so.

a3a

:oﬂuEwEoU

st

333.5

3380
u&gt;tmuu0

332:.

REEF

oz

285:?“

285:»;

..H..U
.._oau&gt;mm

.355
38.“.

Saucmcmmm

.355

Amaze...

oz

uhu

OZ

0z

.

.3

2.

�,amr»:

.

“

‘

..

SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

225

,

..

new...

4..

,wu

referred for electroshock because he is older, poorly educated or
foreign-born, clinical experience having shown that such persons
respond best to this type of treatment. This explanation is inadequate since half the patients with psychotic depression received
psychotherapy alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice for this illness.
An alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to
choice of treatment because they also affect certain psychological
patterns of behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy,
such as mode of communication. Thus, a patient is not referred for
electroshock because he is foreign-born or poorly educated, but
rather these factors provide the difference in cultural background
between patient and therapist which makes successful communication less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Robinson et al.
(15), in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that
psychotherapy is most likely to take place where the cultural background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist. Conversely,
patient-therapist differences in systems of value and communication
may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. In the
present study, similarly, the patients who received psychotherapy
alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors

studied.7

.

Apart from the problem of patient-therapist differences, certain
patterns of communication exhibited by the patient may be intrinsically incompatible with the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have shown that
verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy and use of cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8). Such
language patterns appear to be more frequent in persons with
poorer sociocultural backgrounds.
Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect on communication patterns, may also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler (11) has noted that, among patients diagnosed as
schizophrenic, differences in symptoms are related to differences in
cultural background. Frank et a1. (2), studying psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose symptoms were expressed in
somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those,
who remained had ideational symptoms. In a study of personality
7 The 18 therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and
a mean age of 33.9. Sixteen
per cent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education was over

20.

,
.vr"

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

226

factors‘in electroshock patients (8) we have noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and communication were more likely to be
associated with the development of a depressive psychosis. The relationship between communication pattern and symptoms indicates
that symptoms themselves are a mode of communication.
The F scale furnishes a quantiﬁable index of attitude and communication patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a
mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers
were less receptive to entering a psychotherapeutic relationship and
were more likely to receive electroshock. Tougas (17), using an
etlmocentric scale similar to the F scale, found that psychotherapy
was more effective in patients with low scores. In the present study
the F scale was the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment groups.
These results have clinical as well as theoretical signiﬁcance.
Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that lowscorers on the F scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that
those with high F scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone.
Another clinical application may be in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient. This may be done by
minimizing their social differences, by matching them more closely
for age and place of birth. Of possible greater importance is the
necessity for developing new modes of communication when treating
patients who are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic ap1

proaches.

While epidemiological studies have clearly structured some of the
problems involved in selection of treatment,‘and have indicated
the direction of further. study, it still remains for more processoriented research to provide deﬁnitive answers.
SUMMARY

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which all forms of
therapy were equally available, education, age, place of birth, and
score on the California F scale were signiﬁcantly related to the type
of therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive hospital
1.

servrces.

’

Patients who were older, poorly educated, had higher F scores
and were foreign-born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most
likely to be referred for electroshock. Psychotherapy was the treat2.

�.

.
p

*Wﬂg
g

“A

4““
..

)WA-W.~»‘,.I_~HWW‘W«

"r
.t.

SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

227

ment of choice for those patients who most closely resembled the
therapist in these aspects.
3. These relationships were present even when diagnosis 'was
held constant.
4. Among the electroshock patients the same factors found to be
signiﬁcant in choice of therapy were also related to the readiness
With which a patient was referred for electroshock.
5. It is postulated that treatment selection is the result of the
communicative interaction between patient and therapist. Social
factors may be important in so far as they are related to different
modes of communication.
APPENDIX

“Wadwﬂ

a

F SCALE FORM

.

Below are a number of statements. For each statement we want
you to give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree. Answer each statement according to one of the following:
I AGREE A LITTLE
I AGREE PRETTY MUCH
I AGREE VERY MUCH

3),."

glue»:

‘.

1. No sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation.
2. Science has its place, but there are many important things
that must always be beyond human understanding.
3. If people would talk less and work more, everybody would be

better off.
4. When a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not
think
about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.
to
5. What the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determination, and the will to work and ﬁght for family and country.
6. Nowadays when so many different kinds of people mix together so much, a person has to protect himself especially carefully
against catching an infection or disease from them.
7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.
8. The best teacher or boss is the one who tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to go about it.
9. Young people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down.‘
.

\4

I DISAGREE A LITTLE
I DISAGREE PRETTY MUCH
I DISAGREE VERY MUCH

�\‘
KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

228

People can be divided into two distinct classes: the weak
the
and
strong.
10.

REFERENCES
(1)
(2)

(3)
(4)
(5)
(5)

(7)

Adorno, T. W.; Frenkcl-Brunswik, E.; Levinson, D. J. 8c Sanford, R. N.:
The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper 8.: Brothers, 1950.
Frank, J. D.; Gliedman, L. H.; Imber, S. D.; Nash, E. H. 8: Stone, A. R.:
Why Patients Leave Psychotherapy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (9' Psychiat., 77:

283-299, 1957.
Freedman, L. Z. 8: Hollingshead, A. B.; Neurosis and Social Class. Am. J.
Psychiat., 113:769-775, 1957.
Hillside Hospital: 29th Annual Report, 1956.
Hollingshead, A. B. 8: Redlich, F. C.; Schizophrenia and Social Structure.
Am. ]. Psychiat., 1102695-701, 1954.
Hollingshead, A. B. Fe Redlich, F. C.: Social Class and Psychiatric Disorders.
In: Interrelations Between the Social Environment and Psychiatric Disorders. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, pp. 195-208, 1954.
Kalm, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
In: Psychopathology of Communication, ed. P. Hoch 8: J. Zubin. New York:

Grune 8: Stratton, 1957.
Kahn, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to
Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neural. (in press).
(9) Levinson, D. J.: Personal Communication.
(10) Morgan, N. C. 8.: Johnson, N. A.: Failures in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:824-830, 1957.
(11) Opler, M. R.: Schizophrenia and Culture. Scientiﬁc American, 197:103-110,
-

(8)

1957.

Rachlin, H. L.; Goldman, G. S.; Gurvitz, M.; Lurie, A. 8: Rachlin, L.:
Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from Hillside Hospital in 1950.
This Journal, 5:17-40, 1956.
(13) Rcdlich, F. C.; Hollingshcad, A. B.; Roberts, B. H.; Robinson, H. A.:
Freedman, L. Z. 8c Meyers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Disorders.
Am. ]. Psychiat., [09:729-734, 1953.
(14) Rennie, T. A. C.; Srolc, L.; Opler, M. K. 8: Langner, T. 8.: Urban Life and
Mental Health. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:831-837, 1957.
(15) Robinson, H. A.: Redlich, F. C. 8: Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Treatment. Am. ]. Orthopsychiat., 24:307-316, 1954.
(15) Titus, H. E. 8c Hollander, E. P.: The California F Scale in Psychological
Research: 1950-1955. Psychol. Bull., 54:47-64, 1957.
(17) Tougas, R. R.: Ethnocentrism as a Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy. In:
Psychotherapy and Personality Change, ed. C. R. Rogers 8: R. F. Dymond.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 196-214, 1954.
(13) Zierer, E. 8: Zierer, E.: Structure and Therapeutic Utilization of Creative
Activity. Am. ]. Psychother., 10:481-519. 1956.
(12)

.

�Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy
in a Voluntary Mantal Hospital

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Max Fink, M.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National
Health Service.
10-8-57

Institute of mental Health,

U.S. Public

N.Y¢

�Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between social

class

and

psychiatric disorder with respect to type

illness (3, 5, 6,
and

therapeutic

and incidence of mental

selection and.maintenance of treatment (2, 6, 15),

13, 1h),

outcome (10).

The

present study is concerned with social

factors in the selection of therapy in.a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich and

(3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of

classes

on the

of residence.

New Haven was

their co-workers

divided into five social

basis of weighted criteria of education, occupation
Of

the residents

who

were under

and place

psychiatric care, those

from

the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while
organic treatment or custodial care
Of

was more common among

the psychotherapies, psychoanalysis

groups.

Social class

selected even
as follows:

when
"

was

was

held constant.

They summarize

is found that treatment does not

and medical determinants alone, but on the

well.

entirely restricted to the

two upper

the predominant determinant of the type of treatment

the diagnosis

..... it

was

the lower classes.

their results

depend on psychological

status position of the patient as

Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high degree

to the upper social levels.

The

data of this study would

most psychotherapy takes place in a

setting

seem

to indicate that

where the background of the

patient

is similar to that of the therapist" (15).

It is

possible to relate the results obtained from these

community

studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the

�extent

and type of treatment

facilities available.

A

more

critical test of the

importance of social factors affecting choice of treatment would be in a setting
where the same

therapeutic techniques

This requirement

is

met

and services are

available to

all patients.

at Hillside HoSpital. It is a non-profit,

sectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with "early
curable mental symptoms" (h),
pay.

of the main

One

who

non—

and

are admitted regardless of their ability to

criteria for accepting patients is their "ability to

participate profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy

available

is regarded as the primary

when needed.

The average

method of treatment with organic

therapies

length of hospital stay is six months, al-

though some patients remain for as long as a year.
The

present investigation is

of electroshock therapy.

an outgrowth of several years of study

In previous work

it

has been shown

that certain

aspects of personality were significantly related to patient selection and

therapeutic efficacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose

patients differ

of the present study

was

to determine whether electroshock

from those receiving other forms of treatment in regard

cultural background, including_such factors as education
and

personality as measured

by the

California

F

and place of

to

birth,

scale (1); secondly, whether

these factors were also related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.

�Mame:
Population:
as of March 7,

16

entire in-patient adult population of Hillside Hospital

studied.

1957 was

ranging in age from

llh

The

This constituted a

to 68 with a

mean

total of

172

of 3h.6, and including

patients,

58 men and

women.

Procedure:

1) The

population

was

subdivided into three groups according

to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy, (b) insulin

coma

therapy,

and (c) psychotherapy only. *

2) The groups were compared for age, education and place

of birth.
3)

of the California

naire (see

F

All patients

were

tested

scale suggested by Levinson (9).

Appendix) which has been

indicates whether

tent.

The

scale

is a question-

The

patient reads ten statements

he agrees or disagrees with each statement and

to

what ex-

score given for each item ranges from one to seven and the total

score range is

tained.

The F

related to such factors as authoritarianism,

acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
and

** with a ten-item modification

The

10

to 70.

The

greater the agreement the higher the score

obs

statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this
management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data was
included in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

* All

part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F scale
prior to treatment. In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on march 7th their pre-treatment scores were used in the statistical comparison since it had been found that EST significantly affects the score during

** As

treatment.

�- h h) The population was subdivided in regard to

of certain adjunctive services in the hospital.

Among

such services available

are group

activities, occupational therapy, psychological testing

therapy.

The

latter is

and

be analogies

life experience (18). Psychological testing and creative therapy

selected for this study because both require a specific referral

therapist.

creative

a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a

series of controlled painting procedures which are considered to
of

utilization

were

from the

�RESULTS:

data

The

was analyzed

as follows:

1) comparison of the treatment

groups for age, education, F scale scores and place of
where diagnosis

is held constant,

prior to treatment,

birth, 2) comparison

significance of length of hospitalization

3)

and h) comparison between groups

referred for adjunctive

hospital services.
I.

Comparison of Treatment Groups:

For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard devia—

tions for the
Table

I.

F

scale scores, age and years of schooling are presented in

The EST group had

higher

F

scores,

was

older and had fewer years

of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups.

differences
reach

were

statistically significant for

statistical significance for education.

cation to differentiate the groups
electroshock group contained

many

was due,

F

These

score and age but failed to

The

failure of years of edu-

in part, to the fact that the

foreign born patients whose education

was

difficult to evaluate accurately.

When

number of

eight years of education, the difference

was

patients

above and below

significant at the .01 level.

not differ

statistically for

The

treatment groups were subdivided into

insulin

any of these

and psychotherapy groups did

factors.

�***

**

ﬁg

*

$3qu

dumumww

33mg.
menwmwowOa

mmwnwOu

macaw

mmeanmcpwn

Humcﬁuamov

Hamcwwuawmwoan

mnmunHnmUd

md

.oow

mumbwwwomsw

309

mwmuwwwomud

ma

ma

.OH

.ow

38

w.w

ma

Hw.o

83..

Emma

wrm

ﬂaw

ES.

Emma

w
macaw

Hm&lt;ww

ooavaHmOd

Hm&lt;mw

Hm&lt;mw

.mm

whw
w.ww**

ﬁrm

a

5:0.

55

mu

ow
.msa

mb

H:.&lt;

9%.

saws

wma

35

5....“

Emma

pmm
wawmumba

P.4m
r.mm**+

d

m.w

92..

EL

mu

Fm

:78

Pmmiiw.»

H.H

w.:m

fmm
m.wo**x

a
xm"

Emma

“Po

Wm

5L

Pm

Emma

8.0m

ammum

aummwﬁmuw

0%

Fe

mu
mm.
mwocvm

:

2%

m

prbw
wow

wwwos

ESE

Ems

.70.?

pom

E.

m

xmmum

w

m

ow

macaw.

on

Hmeé

ma.

8%

Gm§

pmm.
Scam

5

xv."
53$

macomdwou
moumumb

wwmom

moan

Si:
.39.
mm

3

Gwé

8&amp;3

m

5

mﬁow‘ngmamoé

ow
mum

wwwau

wows

xmu

zwdH&lt;m

wwmom

ow
moan.
mcwoww
wowmums

3%

mﬁooé

mwmnm

333
mmma.

Pd:

wuwﬁw

5

o

ow

m
wonmumu

Smﬁ

3%

wean

woumumu

Carma

wwwdw

H

�f 7

'

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign born patients

than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group being highest of
Among

the foreign born patients, those

who came

all.

countries

from Eastern European

received somatic therapy predominantly, while the majority of those from Western
Europe received psychotherapy alone.

II.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis:
The

diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable

to those reported in previous studies of the heapital population (12).
172
32

patients,

as psychoneurosis and two with other diagnoses.

with other diagnoses.

To

(52%)

As

expected, a larger pro-

received electroshock than did those

control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of

treatment, the psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those
received electroshock and those
shown

who

were given psychotherapy alone.

.02

The

who

results

in Table II.
While the two groups were comparable

shock

the

78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as psychotic depression,

portion of the depressed patients

are

Of

patients

for

age and education, the

electro-

had a much higher mean F score, a

difference significant at the

It is also

that a significantly higher

level of confidence.

demonstrated

proportion of the electroshock patients were born in Eastern Europe.

�*

mug
$0.33
mmHImeoUOI

wﬁduogmumg

$5

mHmUManmﬁw

$8

ma

.Om
ooswmuwmom

Hm&lt;mw

9mm

waw.

Emma

5.0

8Q

Emma

w

ow

mnoum

m}?

9mm

a
maﬁa.

5.:

2mmb

ab

5.m

55

Sh

”5.:

mu

mmdwmmdm

Emma

audr

mmm

0.8

0.8

9%

a
cwmw.

ma
wmwaUOdwo

Emma

a

8.0

Hob

9m

fr

Emma
MmmHm

ow
unmammmwos

prﬁm

mu
Waco.

xm
u

:

w

2:3

3&amp;3

HH

:30
waves
«mmum

m

H.mu

mmomu&lt;ma

0%

m

mm

0H

8253

@050.

25%

Uumwmnmua

Beam

vamm

xm
u

mm

pm

Smé

383

wowu

wwmom

#.0w

*

0%

zmaw&lt;m

w

pm

Hammaamsa

mcwovm
mmmdmun

30,3

ow

3me
wwudw

p

H

3&amp;3

GE

oawmw

�- 9 -

III.

Comparison of Electroshock

Patients According to Length of Hospitalization

Prior to Treatment:
While the electroshock
from those

receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there

intra-group differences.

postulated that the

same

To account

While most of the

less than three

months

for

some

have been shown
were

patients

who

received

after admission, about

EST

h0%

was

to differ

considerable

of these differences

patient

which a given

of three to twelve months. In Table

it

was

were also

referred for electro—

were placed on treatment

were

referred after a period

III the patients are

to the period of hospitalization prior to electroshock.
F

still

factors involved in selection of treatment

related to the readiness with
shock.

patients, as a group,

compared according

Patients

who

had higher

scores and were older were treated earlier than the younger and lower

groups.

Place of birth is also a significant factor.

within three months were foreign born,

six

months were born

cance, although

28%

in the

U.S.

The

While hh% of those

all patients referred after
data

education just

on

F

fails

scale

treated

a period of
of

signifi-

of those treated earlier had less than eight years of

edu—

cation.
IV.

Use of Adjunctive

Hospital Services:

Comparison of the

logical testing is

shown

patients referred for creative therapy

in Table

IV.

It is

of these procedures had significantly lower

clear that those referred for either
F

more education and more were native born than

for these services.

and psycho-

scores, were younger in age, had

patients

who were

not referred

�**

*

w
Beam

Bowm

bmmm

ﬁo

m
Em:

«was

dams

mumuwwwomba

m

3

w

Hmmm

308m

m

ma

mw

w

0

gem.

Bow.

Bow.

80m.

o

n

ma

Hm&lt;mw

mHMou
bmmmaw

do

38.

ow

w
$8

38.

awwmdamua

momvwdmwwumawon

32

“Hwy
.OH

5%

arms

wsmu

u
Bow.

3

m

dumb

38.

80m.
mwmbHWHomUd

w

.Om

Hm&lt;mw
ooswmwwmos

m.4m

3.5

95

Emma

UH%H.

ww.m

5.4

SL

Ewan

w
ow
macaw

Ema

H.Mm

H4.w

d

Fm

tro

ww.m

Sam

mme

mu

m.mm**.wm.5

mu}

$.4H

Tme

UMWﬁ.

wo.H

.zmmu

mmwwmbam

bmm

v.5

H.mw

d

Ho.w

Hm.“

53

mu
&gt;ooowawum

wamxwmbu

v.8

H.mw

UHHH.

Kama

Hm.m

ﬂ;

mb

Emma

Mmmwm

ao

mocnmawou

o.wm

PS

0.3

ebwﬁw

om

d

m.o

Pm

“.4

mb

u

Ho
Hammaw

HHH

N

m

H

H

0

m

ow
waves

323

333

m

:.mm

ammwm

manomdwoa

HP

AHOO$V

m

mw

60ch

SR3

momvwdmwwnmawou

m

ow

on

Baum

wHHow

xm

PH

n
AHOO$V

a

Hm

393

3&amp;3

wows

do

zmdw&lt;m

wwmom

m.wm*

Hammdams¢

w

o

383

0

0

pm

ow
mcuowm
mmmdmus

395

wwuwu

m
R§

oawmu

u

�zo
***

**

*

ac

n.e.

zo
593.

wanWOH.u

-

oummdw&lt;m

ammﬂm

wmwauou.
mammaw&lt;m

zo
mwmuwwwnmbﬁ

mHmuwanmbd

owocwm

mumswwwombd

Awmv

o.e.

Sea
gamumww

mw

2.:

m» ma

oosvaumOb
ewmuquawomv

Amqv

.ow .Om

ow
.OOH‘Hmamu

wm&lt;mw

wm&lt;mw

m.w

up.»

uwww.

Emma

:H.:

w:

:w.4

mm.“

Saws

w

wmdeUdm

mooam

Hm.w

a

w.wm*4

arm

Hm.w

po.m

mu
wmwmwuma

m.wm***po.w

cwww.

Emma

w&amp;.4

we;

Wm.m

mm.a

Emma

4.0
bmm

%

m.mm**.w.o

Hw.:

a

5.»

Hm.m

5.»

Ho.a

wow

Ho.p

mu

:.mo**wm.w
&gt;aucundwdo

ﬁuww

smmu

Hp.m

rw.m

Emma

wmmwm

wacnmdwou

H.4w
m.&lt;***

&amp;

m.wm

ow

E

p.»

w.“

Bbmbm

mu
mmH&lt;Hnmm

H&lt;

N»
u

Hm

prwv

m

33

mm

ww

p

mmwot

ow

u
Awmﬁv

Am$v

m

«mmdm

m.mw*
macomduon

r.mm*

mw

d

mm

Am4$v

3.33

Ammﬁv

mm

m

ow

mmRnwowomwoww

0%

Amway
Beam

ammﬁwmm

xm

4H

mp

u

N»

Q:

my
moan
zmdu&lt;m

u
Aqmav

8%

A4H$V

“mpgv

mum
wwmnm

m.wm*

m.mm*

Hm

v

mw

H

ow
mcuowm

owmmaw&lt;m

mmmdmwu

prﬁv

Q:

“MN$V

Amﬁv
wwudw

m

m

m

m

Amﬁv

:3:

Amﬁv

Ammv

akumnm

OdWmH

�-12..
DISCUSSION:

results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of birth

The

and F scale score were

significantly related to the type of therapy received

and

to the utilization of adjunctive services in this hospital.

Psychotherapy was

the treatment of choice for those patients

better educated,

native born and had lower

F

scores.

Such

were younger,

who

patients

were

also referred

more

frequently for the auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing
creative therapy. Conversely, those patients
were

older, poorly educated
likely to

were most

be

and foreign born,

referred for

EST.

who

and

had higher F scale scores,

particularly in Eastern Europe,

These

patients

were

infrequently

referred for psychological tests or for creative therapy. Furthermore, these
relationships

were

still

significant

when

diagnosis

was

held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of Hollingshead, Redlich
and

their

co—workers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15) who demonstrated

related to the type of therapy received in a

community.

The

present study

that such factors are also significant in a hospital setting

demonstrates

ability to

that social factors are

is not a criteria of therapeutic selection

pay

and where

all

where

forms

of therapy are equally available to the entire population.
With

financial aspects

and the

availability of therapeutic facilities

eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the selection
of treatment,

factors

may

of therapy.

two

alternative interpretations

may be

considered.

The

social

relate directly to the empirically established criteria for choice
On

this basis a patient is referred for electroshock because

older, poorly educated or foreign born, clinical experience having

shown

he

that

is

�- 13 such persons respond best to
adequate since

this type of treatment. This explanation is in-

half the patients with psychotic depression received psychotherapy

alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice

for this illness.
An

alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to

choice of treatment because they also affect certain psychological patterns of
behavior fundamental to conventional

cation.

Thus, a

modes

of therapy, such as

mode

of

communi-

patient is not referred for electroshock because he is foreign

born or poorly educated, but

rather, these factors provide the difference in

cultural background between patient

and

therapist

which makes successful communi»

cation less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship.

Robinson 33

Ei'

(15)

in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that psychotherapy is
most

likely to take place

where the

cultural background of the patient is similar

to that of the therapist. Conversely, patient-therapist differences in systems
of value and communication may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic

tionship. In the present study, similarly, the patients

who

rela—

received psycho-

therapy alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors studied.*
Apart from the problem of

patient-therapist differences, certain patterns

of communication exhibited by the patient may be

intrinsically incompatible with

the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations

haVe

therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9.
Sixteen percent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education

* The 18

was over 20.

�-11).shown

that verbally

and use of

uncommunicative persons, prone

to denial, evasion, stereotypy

cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8).

patterns appear to

be more frequent in persons with poorer

Such language

socio-cultural back-

grounds.

Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect

cation patterns,

that,

has noted

may
among

on communi-

also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler

(11)

patients diagnosed as schizophrenic, differences in

symptoms

are related to differences in cultural background. Frank 33 a}. (2), studying
psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose

symptoms were

expressed

in somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those
mained had
shock

ideational

patients (8)

we

symptoms.

symptoms

likely to

The

indicates that
The F

In a study of personality factors in electro~

hare noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and

communication were more

depressive psychosis.

re~

who

be associated with the development of a

relationship between communication pattern

symptoms themselves

are a

mode

and

of communication.

scale furnishes a quantifiable index of attitude and communication

patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a mental hospital
lation, Levinson (9) found that high—scorers

were

popuu

less receptive to entering a

psychotherapeutic relationship and were more likely to receive electroshock.
Tougas (17), using an

ethocentric scale similar to the

F

scale, found that

psychotherapy was more effective in patients with low scores.

study the

F

scale

was

In the present

the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment

groups.
These

results have clinical as well as theoretical significance.

�Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that low—scorers
the

scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that those with high

F

on
F

scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone. Another clinical application
may be

in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient.

This may be done by minimizing

closely for

age and place of

necessity for developing

their social differences, by matching

birth.

new modes

Of

them more

possible greater importance is the

of communication

when

treating patients

who

are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic approaches.*
While epidemiological

studies have clearly structured

some

of the

problems involved in selection of treatment, and have indicated the direction

of further study,

it still

remains for more process-oriented research to provide

definitive answers.

* See

Esecover's presentation of this topic in this issue.

�_

16 -

SUMMARY:

1.

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection

of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which

all

forms of therapy were

equally available, education, age, place of birth and score
F

on

the California

scale were significantly related to the type of therapy received and to the

utilization of adjunctive hospital services.
2.

who

were

older, poorly educated, had higher

F

scores

foreign born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most likely to

and were

be

Patients

referred for electroshock.

those patients

who

most

Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for

closely resembled the therapist in these aspects.
were present even when diagnosis was held

3.

These

relationships

h.

Among

the electroshock patients the

constant.

significant in choice of therapy
which a

patient
S.

was

were

factors found to

be

also related to the readiness with

referred for electroshock.

It is postulated that

treatment selection is the result of the

communicative interaction between patient and
be important

same

therapist. Social factors

may

insofar as they are related to different modes of communication.

�m

17 -

REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford, R.N.

(1950):
&amp;

The

Authoritarian Personality,

New

York: Harper

Brothers.

Frank, J.D., Gliedman, L.H., Imber, S.D., Nash, E.H. and Stone, A.R.
(1957):

Why

Neurol.

&amp;

Patients

Leave Psychotherapy, A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat., 11:

283—299.

Neurosis and Social Class,

Freedman, L.Z. and Rollin gsheadﬁﬁ. (1957):
Am.

J. Psychiat.,

Hillside Hospital, 29th

113: 769-775.

Annual Report, 1956.

Schizophrenia and Social

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Structure,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

110: 695-701.

Social Class and Psychiatric

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Disorders, in Interrelations Between the Social Environment
and

Psychiatric Disorders,

New

York:

Milbank Memorial Fund,

pp. 195-208.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

Therapy.
Zubin,

M.

(1957):

Changes

in

Language During Electroshock

In Psychopathology of Communication (Hoch, P. and

J. Eds.),

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

New

York: Grune

&amp;

Stratton.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol., in press.
Levinson, D.J.:
10.

Personal Communication.

Morgan, N.C. and Johnson, N.A. (1957):

Chronic Hospital Patient,

Am.

Failures in Psychiatry:
J. Psychiat.,

The

113: Sen-830.

�_

18

_

REFERENCES

11.

Schizophrenia and Culture, Scientific American,

Opler, M.K. (1957):

£91: 103» 110.
12.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, G.S., Gurvitz, M., Lurie,
(1956):

J. Hillside Hospital, 2:

1950,

and

Psychiatric Disorders,

Am.

Social Structure

J. Psychiat.,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

109: 729-73h.

Titus,

Psychiatric Treatment,

Am.

H.E. and Hollander, E.P. (1957):

Urban

113: 831—837.

Robinson, H.A., Redlich, F.C. and Myers, J.K. (l95h):
and

16.

l7—h0.

Rennie, T.A.C., Srole, L., Opler, M.K. and Langner, T.S. (1957):

Life and Mental Health,
15.

L.

Redlich, F.C., Hollingshead, A.B., Roberts, B.H., Robinson, H.A.,
Freedman, L.Z. and Meyers, K.J. (1953):

1h.

Rachlin,

Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from

Hillside Hospital in
13.

A. and

Social Structure

J. Orthopsychiat., g3: 307-316.
The

California

F Scale

in

Psychological Research: 1950-1955, Psychol. Bull., 53: h7-6h.
17.

Tougas, R.R. (195%):

Ethnocentrism as a Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy,

In Psychotherapy and Personality Change, 0.3. Rogers and R.F.
Dymond,

16,

Zierer,

E. and

eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. l96-21h.

Zierer,

E. (l956):

of Creative Activity,

Am.

Structure and Therapeutic Utilization

J. Psychotherapy, lg: h81-519.

�-

19 -

APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM

Below are a number of statements.

For each statement

we

give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree.

want you to

Answer each

statement according to one of the following:

I

AGREE A

I
I

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY

LITTLE

1.

No

MUCH

MUCH

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a

close friend or relation.
2.

Science has

its place,

but there are

many

important things that

must always be beyond human understanding.

3.

If

people would

talk less

and work more, everybody would be

better off.
h.

think about
5.

ation,

an

it,

a person has a problem or worry,

it

is best for

him not to

but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

What

and the

6.
much, a

When

the youth needs most is

will to

work and

strict discipline,

fight for family

Nowadays when so many

rugged determin-

and country.

different kinds of people

mix

together

so

person has to protect himself especially carefully against catching

infection or disease
7.

from them.

Sex crimes, such as rape and

mere imprisonment; such criminals ought

to

attack
be

on

children, deserve

more than

publicly whipped, or worse.

�”"1
‘

-20..
8.

is to

The

best teacher or boss is the

be done and how

9.

to

go about

10.

the strong.

tells

us exactly what

it.

Young people sometimes

up they ought to get over them and

one who

get rebellious ideas, but as they

settle

grow

down.

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak and

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2524">
                <text>Social factors in selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. J Hillside Hosp., 6: 216-228, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2525">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2526">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-25-030</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2527">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2528">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2529">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2530">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2531">
                <text>4 items. 1: [Preprint]. 2: Reprint from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry December 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565—574; title: Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital. 3: Xerox of J. Hillside Hospital publication. 4: Another [preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2532">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2533">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74455">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81016">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87577">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94138">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="274" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="65">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/b97c9ed1045d743c104ef57163e90f61.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cca8258a1cb2c00bbe3baaafbd7ccf91</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100691">
                    <text>Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization. Qis‘éttarge Ratings. and Diagnosis

ROBERT L. KAHN. P|1.D.; MAX POLLACK. Ph.D..
AND

J’

MAX FINKI M.D.
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

�Reprinted from the A. ill. .4. Archives of General Psychiatry
December 1959, Vol. 1. pp. 565—574
Copyright 1959, by American .llca’ical Association

Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings, and Diagnosis
ROBERT L. KAI-IN,

Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D.,

and

The increasing studies of the sociopsy—
chological aspects of psychiatric treatment
in recent years have primarily been concerned with treatment patterns in the community}? private practice,29 and outpatient
clinics.24’2" In the studies reported by
Hollingshead, Redlich, and their co—workers “'27 it was found that social class was
a major determinant of the type of psy—
chiatric treatment in the New Haven com—
munity. Patients from the upper classes
were more frequently treated with psycho—
therapy, while somatic or custodial care was
commoner among the lower classes. They
summarized their results by noting: “It was
found that treatment does not depend on
psychological and medical determinants
alone, but on the status position of the pa—
tient as well.” 27 Weinstock,29 reporting the
results of a poll of the American Psycho—
analytic Association, observed that the pa—
tients being treated by their members in
private practice came disproportionately
from the better—educated, high—income pop—
ulation.
Similar ﬁndings have been noted in
studies of outpatient facilities. Myers and
Schaffer 24 showed that the higher a per—
son’s social class the more likely he was to
be accepted for psychotherapy, treated by
more highly trained personnel, and treated
intensively over a long period of time. In
another study Rosenthal and Frank 28
Submitted for publication April 16, 1959.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by Grants M-927 and MY—2092,
National Institute of Mental Health, National 1n—
stitutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

MAX PINK, M.D., Glen Oaks, N.Y.

found almost a linear relationship, between
educational level and frequency of referral
for psychotherapy.
A more critical test of the importance
of sociopsychologic factors in relation to
psychiatric treatment would be in a setting
where the same therapeutic techniques and
services were equally available to all patients. This requirement is met at Hillside
Hospital, which is a nonproﬁt institution for
the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable symptoms,” 11 who are
admitted regardless of their ability to pay.
One of the main criteria for accepting pa—
tients is their “ability to participate proﬁt11
in
ably
Individual
psychotherapy.”
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is
regarded as the primary method of treatment, with physiodynamic therapies available when needed. The average length of
hospital stay is seven months, although
some patients stay for more than a year.
In a previous study of the Hillside Hos—
pital population,14 it was shown that the
factors of age, education, place of birth,
and degree of stereotypy, as measured by
the California F Scale,1 were related to the
selection of therapy. Those patients who
were older, had less education, were
foreign—born, and had high scores on the F
Scale were more likely to receive convulsive
therapy. In contrast, patients who were
younger, better—educated, and native—born
and obtained low scores on the F Scale re—
ceived psychotherapy as their sole form of
treatment.
The purpose of the present study was to
determine the relation of sociopsychological
27/565

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

factors to (1) the duration of hospitaliza—
tion, (2) the clinical evaluations at time of
discharge, and (3) the ﬁnal diagnosis.

Method
Population—The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside Hospital on March 7, 1957, was
studied. This consisted of 171 patients, 57 male and
114 female, ranging in age from 16 to 68 years,

'

i

with a mean of 35 years.
Procedure.——The patients were divided according
to the duration of hospitalization, clinical response
to treatment, and diagnosis. The duration was de—
termined by the number of complete months in the
hospital. The clinical response and the diagnosis
were determined by the medical director at a staff
evaluation conference, usually held just prior to the
patient’s discharge. Each patient was rated as
recovered, much improved, improved, or unim—
proved on the basis of the reports of the therapist,
supervising psychiatrist, and milieu staff. The
discharge diagnoses were divided into four major
groups: involutional psychosis, manic—depressive
psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychoneurosis. These
diagnostic categories included all but three patients
in the population.
Each patient was tested with a 10-item modi—
ﬁcation of the California F Scale.” The F
Scale is a questionnaire which has been related to
such factors as authoritarianism, acquiescence,
ethnocentrism, and rigidity.1 The subject reads 10
statements and indicates to what extent he agrees
or disagrees with each, i.e., “a little,” “pretty
much," or “very much.” The score for each item
1 to 7, and the total score
from
range is
ranges
10 to 70. High scores indicate greater agreement
with the statements. These are extreme, uncritical,
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one statement is this: “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”

1.

Results
Length of Hospitalization—In this

population the duration of hospitalization
ranged from 1 to 16 months, with a median
of 7 months. For the purpose of analysis,
the population was divided into three
groups: 49 patients Who were hospitalized
for 1 to 5 months; 64, for 6 to 9 months,
and 58 for 10 or more months.
The relation of sociopsychological factors
to the length of hospitalization is shown in
Table l. The group of patients who were
hospitalized for the shortest period had
28/566

of Hospitalization: Total
Population

TABLE 1.——Dnrati0n

Months in
Hospilal
to
to

1

6

No.

5
S)

or more

1.0

49
64
58

l
6

to 51‘s. ﬁlo?)
to 5 vs. 10 or
more
to 9 vs. 10 or
more

Education.
Mean
ForeignYr.
Born

F Score.
Mean

Mean
Yr.

43.9
31.0

45.5
32.5
27.9

10.0
11.9
12.8

Mean

M can

Diﬂ'e-

Mean
Differ-

ences

ences

13.0

§

1.9

T

§

40.1

Diﬁ: reneos
1

Age,

3.4
12.9

§

17.6

§

2.8

9.5

§

4.6

*

0.9

41%
19%
10%
x ’=15.0 I

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.

*

1‘

the highest mean F scores, were oldest, and
had the least education and the largest per—
centage of foreign—born. Conversely, the
group in the hospital for 10 months or more
had the lowest F scores, were youngest, and
had the most education and the smallest
percentage of foreign births. Patients who
were hospitalized for an intermediate period
fell in be;ween these two groups for each
of the factors.
When the data for those patients who re—
ceived convulsive therapy (Table 2) and
those who received psychotherapy (Table
3) as their only form of treatment were
analyzed separately, similar relationships
between sociopsychological factors and
length of hospitalization were found within
each group.
In the psychotherapy group there was an
increase in mean years of education with
greater months of hospitalization, but the
differences fail of signiﬁcance. It may be
noted, however, that many of the patients
who were in the hospital for 10 months or
more were under 19 years of age and were
thus unable to achieve more than a limited
number of years of schooling.
These same relationships of sociopsychological factors to length of hospitalization
were found when the patients were classi—
Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

2,—Dnration of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving C onvnlswe Therapy
F Score,
N0. Mean

Months in
Hospital
to 5
6 to 9
10 or more

15

1

17
25

58.2
45.6
34.9

ences

to 5 vs.
1 to 5 v8.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
*
T

1
§

to 9
10 or

12.61

6

Differences
9.5

Education,
Mean
ForeignYr.

*

‘

Months 1”
Hospital

Born

67%
24%
16%
x2= 12.0

6.5
12.3
13.2

Mean

or

1 '50

§

19.6

§

*

10.1

1

t

to 5 vs.
to 5 vs.
more
to 9173.
more

1

§

0.9

Education,
Mean
Yr.

ForeignBorn

11-4
11-7
12.4

29-1
24-8

30%
16%
8%
x2=5.4

istic of patients hospitalized for the longest
periods. As a group, patients diagnosed
as schizophrenic were the most homoge—
neous in relation to time in the hospital,
showing major differences only in the F
score, without a consistent trend for the
factors of education or place of birth.
2. Results of Treatment—The relation
of sociopsychological factors to evaluation
on discharge is shown in Table 5. There

to 9
10 or
6

1.6
12.4

10

ences

*

Mean

Differences

141*

0.3

*

1,0

18.4

or
10.8

4.3

0.7

a deﬁnite, almost linear, relationship be—
tween the ratings of improvement and these
factors. Patients in the recovered group
had the highest F scores, were oldest, least
educated, and showed the highest incidence
of foreign birth. In contrast, patients in
the unimproved group had the lowest F
scores, were younger, better educated, and
were mostly native—born. Because of the
Wide variability within each group, however,
only the factor of age reached a level of
statistical signiﬁcance. Education also sig—
niﬁcantly differentiated the groups when
dichotomized according to- those who had
less than eight years of education and those
who had eight years or more. Of the re—
covered patients, 29% had less than eight
IS

ﬁed according to four major diagnostic
groups (Table 4). For each diagnostic
class, the lowest F scores, youngest mean
ages, most years of education, and least
percentages of foreign—born were character—

Mean
Diﬁer-

P=0.001.

.

-

.

.

.

4.—Duration 0f Hospitalization in Patients Classiﬁed According to Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Involutional psychosis ___________________

Manic-depressive psychosis

..............

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
Mean

1-5
6-9

58.2
150.9

10+
1—5

6-9

10+

...........................

1-5
6-9

10+

............................

1-5

10+

Kahn et al.

432

Differences

*

Psychoneurosis

40-2
38-6
27-8

Mean

OHCES

6.7

Mean
Yr.

26

Mean
Diﬂer5.8

F Score,
Mean

33
43

5

Age,

1

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
P&lt;0.01.
P&lt;0.001.

TABLE

N 0-

to 9
or more

6
10

6

10.7

Schizophrenia

of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Psychotherapy Only

1

23.3
10

Mean
Yr.
51.7
42.2
32.1

Mean
Diﬁer1

Age,

TABLE 3.———Dnration

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

35.0

58.8
54.5
52.3

16.0

40.0
46.1
33.1

46.8
39.1
35.5

11.0
11.7
12.3

39%
23%

40.1
36.6
36.1

41.0
27.1

8.7
12.5

27.1

12.5

50%
19%
13%

36.3
38.5
27.6

27.8
27.8
24.1

13.3
12.3
12.9

7.1

9.6

57%
43%
0

0

10%

8%
12%

39/567

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
TABLE

5.—Discharge Evaluation

No.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................
................................
.............................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved
Unimproved

17

'

82
63
9

F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

42.9
39.0
36.1
31.1

44.5
35.6
31.2
31.1

10.7
11.2
11.2
13.2

Mean

Mean
Differences

M ean

Differences

Recovered vs. Much Improved _____________________________
Recovered vs. Improved
Recovered vs. Unimproved
Much Improved vs. Improved
Much Improved vs. Unimproved
Improved vs. Uni mproved

3.9
6.8
11.8
2.9
7.9
5.0

....................................
.................................
.............................
...........................
.................................

Age,

8.9
13.3

*

13.4

*

4.4
4.5
0.1

T

Foreign-Born
41%
22%
16%
11%
x2=6.1

Differences

I

0.5
0.5
2.5
0.0
2.0
2.0

‘ P&lt;0.05.

t P&lt;0.02.
3

P&lt;0.01.

years’ education, while all of the unimproved
patients had more than eight years’ educa—
tion; the much improved and improved pa—
tients were in between. By x2—analysis
these results were signiﬁcant at the 5%
level of conﬁdence.
When the data were analyzed for the
patients treated with convulsive therapy, the
trends noted for the population as a whole
were intensiﬁed (Table 6). Analysis of the
patients who received psychotherapy as
their only form of treatment (Table 7),
however, failed to show any statistically
signiﬁcant pattern. The recovered patients
were oldest and had the highest percentage
of foreign births, but education and F score
did not show any clear trend.
TABLE

relation of sociopsychological factors to diagnosis is shown in
Table 8. Those patients classiﬁed as show—
ing involutional reactions had the highest
F scores, the oldest mean age, the least
years of education, and the highest inci—
dence of foreign birth. In contrast, pa—
tients classiﬁed as schizophrenic had the
lowest F scores, the youngest mean age, the
most years of education, and the least num—
ber of foreign—born. Patients classed in
manic—depressive psychosis and psycho—
neurosis categories were in between with
regard to these social factors.
3. Diagnosis.‘—The

Comment
The present study has demonstrated that

sociopsychological factors, in addition to

6.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving C onvnlsive Therapy

Evaluation

No.

F Score,
Mean

Recovered _______________________________
Much improved __________________________
Improved and unimproved _______________

8
26
23

53.1
41.8
39.7

Foreign-Born

51.6
43.8
32.3

9.4
10.6
12.3

50%
35%
17%

x '=3.5

Mean
Differences

Recovered vs. much improved ______________________________
Recovered ”8. improved and unimproved ____________________
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved _____________

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Age,

11.3
13.4 "
2.1

Mean

Mean
Differences

7.8
19.3 I
11.5 T

1.2
2.9
1.7

Differences

*

‘ P&lt;0.05.

P&lt;0.02.
1 P&lt;0.001.
1

30/568

Vat. 1, Dee, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

7.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving Psychotherapy Only
N0.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved and unimproved ...............

9

54
39

F Score,
Mean
32-6
38.1
33.5

Mean
Diﬂerences

..............................
...................
.............

Recovered vs. much improved
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved

5.5
0.9
4.6

their previously determined importance in
the selection of treatment, are also signiﬁ—
cantly related to the duration of treatment,
the evaluation of the results of treatment,
and the psychiatric diagnosis. If such re—
sults were obtained in a survey of private
practitioners, as in the Weinstock report?9
it could be concluded that the limitation of
the number of practitioners and the expense
of treatment served to select preferred persons from the upper social classes who
could afford the treatment in terms of time
and money. The present results, however,
were obtained in an institution where the
various kinds of treatment were equally
available to all patients and where the ability
to pay was not a factor in the management
of the patient. We postulate, therefore, that
TABLE

Diagnosis

N 0.

Involutional psychosis ___________________
Manic-Depressive psychosis ______________
Psychoneurosis ___________________________
Schizophrenia ____________________________

24

39
37
68

..................

ForeigmBorn

38.2
32.2
31.9

12.3
12.0
12.2

33%
15%
18%

Mean
Differences
6.0
6.3
0.3

x '= 1.8

Mean
Diﬁerences
0.3
0.1
0.2

the observed relationships are not due
merely to mechanically selective aspects,
such as income or the prestige status of the
patient. Social factors are important be—
cause they are also related to psychological
processes, such as the habitual patterns of
communication, modes of expression, and
symbolic values. We shall attempt to
evaluate these processes and their effect on
the psychiatric relationships studied in
terms of the inﬂuence of sociopsychological
factors on the attitude and behavior of the
therapist, the patient, and the therapist—pa—
tient interaction.
Current data both from this laboratory 14
and from others 19'24'27'28 have demon—
strated that psychotherapy is most likely
to be sustained with those persons who most

8.—Diagnosis
F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

52.3
40.8
36.9
32.8

56.7
41.9
29.4
26.1

Mean

Mean

Differences

Involutional vs. Manic-depressive psychosis ________________
Involutional psychosis vs. psychoneurosis
Involutional vs. schizophrenia ______________________________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. psychoneurosis _____________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. schizophrenia _______________
Psychoneurosis us. schizophrenia___________________________

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Age,

11.5
15.4
19.5

3.9
8.0
4.1

I

i
§

’r

Age,

Education,
Mean Yr.
8.9
11.5
11.9
12.7

Differences

14.8
27.3
30.6
12.5
15.8
3.1

2.0 ‘
3.0 I
4.5 §
0.4
1.6
0.8

§
§
§
§

46%
26%
22%
10%
x==14,2 r

Mean

Differences
§

Foreign-Born

P&lt;0.05.
T P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

K ahn et al

31/569

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

closely resemble the therapists with regard
to cultural background, systems of value,
and communication patterns. With stress at
Hillside Hospital on psychoanalytically
oriented psychotherapy, it is consistent that
those patients who are most like the
therapists with regard to these factors would
be kept in the, hospital for the longest
period. This was true for patients receiving
convulsive therapy or psychotherapy and
for all diagnostic groups.
The length of time a patient remains in
a psychiatric facility is related to the particular function and philosophy of the insti—
tution. In studies of outpatient clinics
'
Which have a psychoanalytic orientation 2438
it has been observed that persons from the
higher social classes, determined by education' or income, are treated for a longer
period. In contrast, in state mental hos—
pitals, patients with/the least education are
kept longer and form a higher proportion
of the chronically hospitalized group‘.6'17"23
The state—hospital therapist, Viewing the in—
Stitution primarily as a custodial facility,12
is evidently oriented toward the more rapid
discharge of those patients “who come from
a background most like his own.
The observation of the relation between
sociopsycholo-gical factdrs and improvement
rating, particularly in those patients receiv—
ing convulsive therapy, may also be related
to differences in communication patterns
between therapist and patient that result in
referral for convulsive therapy. The
therapist may set different criteria for im—
provement for the;older, lesseducated pa—
tients than he does for the younger, more
sophisticated ones. In the patient with littlr
education and with modes of expression
different fromhis own, he may regard, for
example, the manifestation of denial or
minimization of symptoms as improvement.15 But in patients culturally like him—
self, the expression of denial is regarded
as a defensive operation, and the patient is
considered unimproved.
Ratings of improvement are also related
to the base line of premorbid functioning.
_

32/570

Thus, the rating of recovered is deﬁned at
Hillside Hospital as “the reasonable expectation that the patient will be able to
return to his community and function as
well, or better, than he did before he became
ill.” 11 The therapist’s perception of the
patient’s premorbid functioning may be influenced by the distance between his value
system and that of the patient’s. The greater
the social distance between therapist and
patient the less rigorous the requirements
for behavioral change may be. For example, for older, lower—class patients the
ability to resume work may be the major
criterion of improvement. For bettereducated patients work adjustment may be
one of many criteria, including such intangible aspects of behavior as insight, work
gratiﬁcation, and ease of sociability. The
patient’s expectancy not only of the type
of psychiatric treatment but of improvement is also dependent upon social back—

ground.12

While the same trends were shown in the
psychotherapy patients, the results did not
reach the level of statistical signiﬁcance.
This may have been due to the greater
homogeneity of these patients for the
factors studied, in contrast to the convulsive group. The outpatient study by
Rosenthal and Frank 28 also failed to ﬁnd a
relation between social factors and improvement rating in the patients who received
psychotherapy. This observation, also,
was obtained in a population that was more
homogeneous after the initial admission
selection process and after the spontaneous
screening effected by the patient’s willingness to attend treatment after he had been
accepted.

The marked relationship between socio~
psychological factors and diagnosis is not
surprising. Certainly, the relationship of
age and diagnosis is an established concept
in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional
disorders and in dementia precox the names
themselves have a chronological connotation. Landis and Page,19 in 1938, stated that
age was the “most important single deterVol. 1, Dec., 19.59

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

mining factor that we can know about men—
tal disease.” They asserted that, given the
age distribution of a group of patients, they
could accurately predict the number in each
diagnostic group, as well as the probable
outcome with respect to recovery and the
length of hospital residence. More recently,
Frumkin,8 reporting the median ages of ﬁrst
admissions to a mental hospital in Ohio,
observed data similar to our own with re—
gard to the ages for the various diagnostic
groups.
In the present study, however, we have
also shown that education, place of birth,
and F score signiﬁcantly differentiate the
major diagnostic groups in the hospital. In
view of these ﬁndings, we have postulated
that a psychiatric diagnosis is not just a
one—to—one reﬂection of a speciﬁc type of
behavior pattern but is also a value judg—
ment in terms of social interaction. Thus,
both in our own studies and in the work of
others 12 it has been noted that patients
with similar symptoms will receive different
diagnoses, depending on their social background.
An additional hypothesis relating sociopsychologic factors to diagnosis may be
based on the concept that persons from dif—
ferent social backgrounds acquire different
habitual modes of adaptation, communica—
tion, and expression. Accordingly, under
conditions of stress, altered brain function,
or states associated with the onset of mental
illness, a person will show those behavior
patterns or symptoms which are similar to
his habitual patterns. Thus, persons from a
lower—class social background are more apt
to communicate in nonverbal, physical
terms, while upper—class people are more
likely to do so in ideational and verbal
modes. Thus, anger may be expressed by
lower—class people by physical violence,
while persons from the upper classes are
more likely to resort to exhortation or argument.
Opler and Singer,25 studying schizo—
phrenic Irish and Italian patients in a
Veteran’s facility, found signiﬁcant difKahn et al.

ferences in the types of symptoms related
to cultural differences in the family backgrounds. Patients from Irish families in
which the active expression of emotions
were frowned upon and who had dominant,
overprotective mothers, were passive, com—
pliant, and withdrawn, and were fearful of
anything which might separate them from
the protection of the hospital. Patients with
Italian family backgrounds that encouraged
free expression of emotion and who were
ruled by a dominant father, showed as—
saultive and destructive behavior, were difﬁ—
cult to manage, and were rebellious against
authority.
In a comparable study, Miller and Swan—
'22
noted that hospitalized schizophrenic
son
patients exhibited signiﬁcant social-class
difference in symptomatology. Lower—class
patients showed a predominance of “mo—
toric themes,” while middle—class patients
exhibited “conceptual or r u m i n a t i v e
themes.”
Hollingshead and Redlich 12 found a
marked difference in the type of neuroses
shown by persons from different social
classes. While hysterical reactions were
found predominantly at the lowest social
levels, obsessive—compulsive patterns were
characteristic of the upper classes. They
felt that the lower—class patient expresses
his neurosis by acting out, whereas the
upper—class neurotic shows his symptoms
in ideational dissatisfaction with himself.
According to our hypothesis, then, we
should expect that persons from lower
social levels would show symptoms that are
nonverbal, and are expressed predominantly
in sensory or motor patterns. Among such
types of symptoms would be psychomotor
retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor,
muteness, hysterical blindness, and paral—
ysis. In this connection it is noteworthy
that both hysteria and manic—depressive
psychosis have been reported on the wane
in the general population."-”4'8'10 This de—
crease, in our View, is related to the general
increase in educational level of the country
as a whole. One cannot, of course, ascribe
33/571

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom
in sexual matters; hysteria is commonest in
more poorly educated people, who are least
2‘6
has reported
inhibited sexually.”6 Rees
that those British soldiers who had hysteri—
cal symptoms in World War II were mainly
the mental defectives. He noted that
hysterical symptoms were related to intelli—
7
indi—
has
education.
and
Freyhan
gence
cated not only that the present clinical
patterns of hysteria are different from those
shown at the turn of the century but that
such schizophrenic manifestations as “cata—
leptic stupors, stereotypical motor peculiar—
ities, grandiose excitement, and violent
behavior” are difﬁcult to ﬁnd today. These
observations suggest that a sociopsycho—
logical framework can lead to the prediction
of future patterns of mental illness.
In our investigations of persons with depressive psychoses, we have frequently
noted a pattern of premorbid behavior char—
acterized by lack of imagination, creativity,
and introspective capacity, and by conven—
tionality and general rigidity.13 Similar
patterns have been reported by other
.authors.3’5"”'21 We believe that a deprived
cultural background, such as that involving
little or no education, with the early years
spent in an illiterate environment with
meager cultural resources, is conducive to
the development of such a personality pat—
tern. When mentally disordered, such per—
sons react with the repertoire of behavior
patterns that we term “depression.”
It is important to keep in mind that While
the relationship between social factors and
the psychiatric aspects described is probably
applicable as a general principle, the speciﬁc
ﬁndings may vary in different settings or
institutions. For example, Hollingshead and
Redlich12 found that schizophrenia was a
diagnosis proportionately commoner among
the lower than among the upper classes,
while at Hillside Hospital the schizophrenic
patients had the highest education. This
discrepancy may be related to differences
in composition of the two populations, the
Hillside patients being drawn largely from
34/572

the middle—class groups, with relatively few
from the upper or lower social classes. In
Hillside Hospital the diagnosis of schizo—
phrenia may indicate an “interesting” pa—
tient, while in a state hospital population the
same diagnosis may represent a patient who
is “hopeless.”
From the perspectives developed in this
report, observations which are commonly
explained in motivational and “dynamic”
terms may also be understood in other
ways. Thus, some situations where a pa~'
tient is said to be “hostile” or “resisting
psychotherapy” may reﬂect a problem in
communication between patient and ther—
apist, related to their differences in social
background.
It also is apparent that the social back—
ground of the majority of the mentally ill
paients is such as to make the current prac—
tice of universally employing a verbal, in—
sightful—oriented therapeutic approach a
difﬁcult, if not inappropriate, procedure.
The answer to the problem of how to treat
the vast number of mentally ill may be
not to train more and more psychother—
apists, but, rather, to develop therapeutic
techniques more suitable to the patient’s
own systems of value and communication.

Summary and Conclusions
Signiﬁcant relationships were found be—
tween sociopsychological factors and dura—
tion of hospitalization, discharge evaluation,
and diagnosis in a voluntary mental hos—
pital.
Patients hospitalized for the shortest
period were oldest, had the least education,
were most likely to have been foreign—born,
and had the highest scores on the California
F Scale. Younger, native—born, more educated, and lower F—score patients were hos—
pitalized the longest.
The same relationship of these factors
to length of hospitalization was found
when analyses were made according to type
of treatment (convulsive therapy or psycho—
therapy) and diagnosis.
Discharge evaluations of improvement
were signiﬁcantly related to age, the older
Vol. 1,

Dec, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

.

patients having the more favorable ratings.
Analysis of the data by type of treatment
demonstrated that patients rated as recovered or much improved after convulsive
therapy had the highest F scores, the least
education, and were most likely to be
foreign-born.
Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psycho—
neurosis were associated with lower F
scores, younger ages, more education, and
native birth. The older, less educated,
foreign—born, high-F-score patients were
most frequently classiﬁed under involu—
tional or manic-depressive psychosis.
It is postulated that these relationships
reﬂect the inﬂuence of social background on
psychological processes, such as the habitual
patterns of communication, modes of eXpression, and symbolic values. These not
only contribute to the pattern of mental ill—
ness but affect all aspects of the patient—
therapist interaction.
Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263d St. (Dr. Fink).

REFERENCES
Adorno, T. W.; Frenkel—Brunswik, E.;
Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.: The
Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper &amp;
Brothers, 1950.
2. Arieti, S.: The Decline of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis: Its Signiﬁcance in the Light of Dynamic and Social Psychiatry, paper read at 113th
Annual Meeting of American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, 1957.
3. Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality,
AMA. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 762617—618,
1.

1956.
4. Chodoff,

P.: A Re-examination of Some

Aspects of Conversion Hysteria, Psychiatry 17:
75-81, 1954.

E;

Baker, R; Cohen, R. A.;
Fromm-Reichmann, F., and Weigert, E.: An In—
tensive Study of 12 Cases of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiatry 17:103-137, 1954.
6. Dunham, H. W., and Meltzer, B. N.:
Predicting Length of Hospitalization of Mental
Patients, Am. J. Sociol. 52:123—131, 1946.
7. Freyhan, F. A.: The Impact of Somatic
Therapies on Course and Clinical Proﬁle of the
Schizophrenias, J. Clin. &amp; Exper. Psychopath. 19:
5.

Cohen, M.

195-201, 1958.

Frumkin, R. M.: Occupation and Major
Mental Disorders, in Mental Health and Mental
8.

Kalm et al.

Disorder, prepared by a committee of the Society
for Study of Social Problems, edited by A. M.
Rose, New York, W. W. Norton &amp; Company,

Inc., 1955, pp. 136-160.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The
Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Depression, Proceeding 42d Annual Meeting of
American Psychopathological Association, edited
by P. H. Hoch and J. Zubin, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952, pp. 199-209.
10. Harvey, W. A.: Changing Syndrome and
Culture: Recent Studies in Comparative Psychiatry,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat. 2:165—171, 1956.
11. Hillside Hospital: Twenty—Ninth Annual Report, 1956.
12. Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C.:
Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community
Study, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
13. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.:
Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. N europsychiatry, to be published.
14. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and
Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a.
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
9.

216-228, 1957.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
Psychopathology of Communication, Proceedings
of 46th Annual Meeting of American Psychopathological Association, edited by P. H. Hoch and
J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1958.
16. Kinsey, A. C.; Pomeroy, W. B., and
Martin,
C. 13.: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1948.
17. Kramer, M.; Goldstein, H.; Israel, R. H.,
and JohnsonpN. A.: A Historical Study of the
Disposition of First Admissions to a State Mental
Hospital, Public Health Monograph No. 32,
Government Printing Ofﬁce, 1955.
18. Kramer, K.; Pollack, E. S., and Redick,
R. W.: Studies of Incidence and Prevalence of
Hospitalized Mental Disorders in the United
States: Current Status and Future Goals, paper
read at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American
Psychopathological Association, New York, 1959.
19. Landis, C., and Page, I. D.: Modern
Society and Mental Disease, New York, Farrar &amp;
Rinehart, Inc., 1938.
20. Gallagher, E. B.; Levinson, D. J., and
Erlich, I.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics
of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric
Treatment, in The Patient and the Mental Hos—
pital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D. I. Levinson, and
R. H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
21. Malamud, W.; Sands, S. L., and Malamud,
I.: The Involutional Psychoses: A Socio—Psy—
chiatric Study, Psychosom. Med. 3:410-426, 1941.
22. Miller, D. R., and Swanson, (3.: Defense
Against Conﬂict and Social Background, paper
15.

35/573

V

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

read as part of a symposium at the meeting of the
American Psychological Association, September,
1953.
23. Morgan, N. C., and Johnson, N.

Disorder, New York, Milbank Memorial Fund,

1950, pp. 51-52.
27. Robinson,

H.

A.; Redlich, F. C., and
Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric
Treatment, Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 24:307-316,

A.: Failures
in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient, Am.
J. Psychiat. 113 :824-830, 1957.
24. Myers, J. K., and Schaffer, L.: Social
Stratiﬁcation and Psychiatric Practice: A Study
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev. 19:

Frank, J. D.: The Fate
of Psychiatric Clinic Outpatients Assigned to
Psychotherapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 127:330—

L.: Ethnic

I.: Report of the Central

307-310, 1954.
25. Opler, M. K., and Singer, J.

Differences
Internat. J.
26. Rees,
Gruenberg,

36/574

in Behavior and Psychopathology,
Soc. Psychiat 2:11—22, 1956.
J. R.: in discussion on paper by
E. M., in Epidemiology of Mental

Printed and Published

1954.
28. Rosenthal, D., and

343, 1958.
29. Weinstock, H.

Committee of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, paper read at the 48th
Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathologi—
cal Association, New York, 1958.
Fact—Gathering

in the United States of

Amerm

�a.

"—1

“‘1

Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

__..1

Fl

l

I
J2

P
]

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in

Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

L.I.

Oaks,

New

York, 1959—1962.

The cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial

Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.

'

"

Aided, in part, by grants My-2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the

Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
.Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street,

York

MIP

10467.

New

York,

New

**

Present Address:

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of
Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

***

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,

2/1/65

Bethesda, Maryland

�their studies of the

psychiatric patient popsignificant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
.and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2)9 The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excludedo
ulation,

In

New

Haven

Hollingshead and Redlich have reported

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including in—

dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to paya In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings. In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingso
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i429, greater stereotypy, were often fOund in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredg

it was suggested that differencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospitala To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions
Hillside
In the survey reported here,

—w

F. Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Hospital, the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston, These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
C.

equally available, yet served patients of different social classeso

Each provided short—term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial careo Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psycho-

analytically—oriented psychotherapyo

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions,

istics

�METHOD

A

census of

institutions

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

in January, 1959. While Menninger and
patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
status. The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
the

was undertaken

Hillside Hospitals

had voluntary

day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2-factor index a weighted score of education and occupation - was used (3,4,7). The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
The study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult however, because of

various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the

differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trends. These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
Sizes.

�RESULTS

A. Methodological Problems
When

of the hospital

reporting studies

tioned briefly.

from one institution, the structure
be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
In gathering comparable data from multiple institu—

may

tions, however, the

many

differences between institutions are accen-

tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific dif—
ferences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome.
1. Designation of Type of Treatment:

designating that
the

institutions,

a

The

criteria for

patient received "psychotherapy" differed

making comparisons

difficult.

among

Hospital psychotherapy was designated as
treatment administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychia—
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.
At Menninger

At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

Individual institutional diagnostic styles
At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
2. Diagnosis:

made comparisons

source of

difficult.

distortion.

�Table I

30 Discharge Ratings of Improvement:
Ratings of imw
provement at the three hOSpitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global

ratings.making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II), For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other

institutions,

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
lo Sociopsycholqgical Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
among the three institutions

education and California F Scale score
is presented in Table III.

Table

III

.

a) Social Class: The anticipated difference in social
class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age distribution

in the institutional populationso

�populations also differed in edu_”
more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduateo
c) Education:

The

cational attainment, with patients having

d) F Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight perm
cent with scores of 50 or above -— the higher F scores being assoc—

iated with higher degrees of stereotypy, In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were below

309

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables

among

these institutions.

2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment:

Among

the

institutions,

significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV)c
b) Duration of Hospitalization: The three insti~
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)o
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalizatione

MMHC
1,——

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved” and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"a The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachu—

patients

setts Mental Health Centera
d)

nostic groupings

Diagnosis: For statistical analysis three diagwere made: schizophrenia, affective disorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV)» The diag~
nostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one~quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty perucent of the

populationo

Table

Co

IV

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier studyg Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsideo
Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals the younger patients remaining for the longest periodso
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year,
The

—

Table

V

�-7DISCUSSION

The patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var~
duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
iables
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7),
Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmed, The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions“
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower preportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
——

It is

our impression that these differences in psymore to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populations, The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data. While these styl~
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow
a pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged.

chiatric treatment are related

Such population and treatment variable relationships
interactive
are
processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presente Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, i£§,, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disordersw Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution,
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residenceo Significant differences did occur, however, in

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical
evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to anothero Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi-

atric characteristics.

In our initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background° It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—

ployed° This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."
While these investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
difficult
it
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapieso The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationsc
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
resultsa Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction,
be

�-10_

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
and F score, were related to treatment variables
education
age,
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in~
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluationo Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distri—
bution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
a-Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods cf hospitalization, lower proportions of
The

institutions

were

psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,

These variations in psychiatric practices followed a
with the social class differences among the inconsistent
pattern
and
are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
stitutions
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula-

tions is

emphasizedo

�REFERENCES

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

J.

and

Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality. Harper and
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

.

and Redlich, F. C. Social Class and
Community Study. John Wiley and Sons,
Illness:
New York, 1958, 442 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

A. B.
A

.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216—228.

.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack,

and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
Diagnosis. Arch, Gen Psychiat., 1959, 15 565—574.
M.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Attitude (Ca1—
ifornia F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J4_Akuabhlkuugkjlui.,
1960, lﬁQ: 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Amari_Jm_EﬁxnhiaL., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality

Alcoholism, Chronic

Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality
Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile.Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical
Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much

Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�III

TABLE

InterhospitaI

Comparisons

for Sociopsychological Variables

Menninger

Hillside

N

(87)

(133)

1

31%

7%

Hospital

Social

Class

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

Hospital

(72)

3%

11

51

20

28

III

17

34

13

,

1v

1

34

28

v

0

5

28

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p:&lt;.001

Age

N

(100)

(173)

”(95)

&lt; 20

19%

19%

15%

20—39

59

‘58

52

40 +

22

23

33

:

x2 =

=~

32%

41%

12-15

54

51

49

16+

23

17

10

7

=

(91)

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05

(92)

(163)

(7%)

10-29

51%

33%

20%

30—49

41

50

38

8

17

42

N

s °°re

“——

23%

x2

F

—=

(173)

-&lt;12

Education

-——'———“:=;=

(100)

N

Years of

3.9; df=4; p=n.s.

50—70

1

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE

IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
iMenninger

Hillside

(100)

(173)

Hospital

N

Type of

Psychotherapy

Treatment Somatic
Other
X2 =

Duration
0?

Hospital—

lzat1°n

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Health
Center
(89)

21%

36%

24%

43

64

68

36

—-

8

82.8; df=4; p(.001

N

(100),

(173)

(95)

*7 months

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

7—11

months

511 months

Xzf 90.6; df=4' p&lt;.001
N

Recovered,

Much

Improved

Discharge

Evaluation Improved
Unimproved
XZ'=
N

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and

Personality Disorder
x2 =

(99)

(172)

(88)

1%

23%

28%

80

62

61

19

15

10

29.3; df=4; p&lt;.001
(95)

(171)

4185)

43%

52%

54%

5

22

17

52

26

29

23.8; df=4; p&lt;.001

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age.

Menninger

Hillside

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

40—49

30

20

50+

36

Below 20

MMHC

l4

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2734">
                <text>Sociopsychologic aspects of psychiatric treatment in a voluntary mental hospital: duration of hospitalization, discharge ratings, and diagnosis. AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1959 Dec;1:565-74.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2735">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2736">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-42-008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2737">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2738">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2739">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2740">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2741">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of General Psychiatry December 1959, Vol. 1. pp. 565—574</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2742">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2743">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74476">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81037">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87598">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94159">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="292" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6557">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9a3312b18cdf6e7ffc1390135fa8f24f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7ebf0740040bf69f9525e1f11a533ee3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107162">
                    <text>20

Soci0psychological A3pects
of Psychiatric Treatment
A Report of Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals
ROBERT L. KAHN, PhD, NEW YORK; MAX FINK, MD, ST. LOUIS;
AND NATHANIEL SIEGEL, PhD, BETHESDA, MD

IN THEIR STUDIES of the New Haven

treated primarily by psychotherapy, and repsychiatric patient population, Hollingshead ceived poorer discharge ratings. These
and Redlich reported signiﬁcant relation— clinical factors were also related to a measscale.""5
California
F
the
of
in
the
individual’s
stereotypy,
ure
position
ships between an
social—class structure and the incidence of
Higher F scores, ie, greater stereotypy, were
treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders, often found in patients diagnosed as inand kinds and duration of psychiatric treat— volutional psychosis who were referred for
ment administered.1 The inﬂuence of the convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
economic status of the patient on the avail- periods, and were more often rated as much
recovered.
improved
or
of
however,
was
personnel,
treating
ability
It was suggested that differences in psy—
not excluded.
should
chiatric
hospitals
treatment
in
the
social
factors
of
among
Studies of the role
social
factors
of
inﬂuence
in—
similar
reﬂect
a
of
hospitalized patients
treatment
Hos—
Hillside
within
noted
for
patients
dependent of their ﬁnancial status and the as
decided
it
to
this
To
was
test
suggestion
pital.
undertaken
of
treatments were
availability
1957
Hillside
the
of
the
procedures
1957.
employ
this
In
in
hospital,
at Hillside Hospital
Hosinstitutions—Hillside
in
three
instudy
a variety of treatment modes, including
dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, pital, the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hosand convulsive therapies were available to all pital, Topeka, Kan, and the Massachusetts
inThese
Boston.
Health
Mental
Center,
patients regardless of their ability to pay.
In our surveys 2'3 we observed that patients stitutions were selected with the expectation
hospitalized for the shortest periods were that diverse treatment modalities were
older, had less education, and were more equally available to populations of different
often of foreign birth. These older, less- social classes. Each provided short—term
educated patients were predominantly treated treatment of voluntary patients and did not
by convulsive therapy and received more provide custodial care. Each is a residency
favorable clinical discharge ratings. In con- training center with a full—time supervisory
trast, younger, native—born, more—educated staff and active research units, emphasizing
patients were hospitalized for longer periods, psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy.
This study was designed to determine the
Submitted for publication June 21, 1965.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
in—
three
the
of
characteristics
population
Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, NY 1959-1962. Currently
at the Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago,
social
with
class,
to
stitutions
age,
respect
the
of
at
the
Psychiatry
Department
Chicago (Dr. Kahn);
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry, University of Missouri
and F score; and to relate these
education,
School of Medicine, St. Louis (Dr. Fink); and the National
characteristics to treatment variables of type
Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr. Siegel).
Reprint requests to 5400 Arsenal St, St. Louis, Mo 63139
of
duration
of
hospitalization,
treatment,
(Dr. Fink).
'

Arch Gen Psychial—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�EPIDEMIOLOGY—DUNHAM
Small City,” in Epidemiology of Mental Disorder,
B. Pasamanick (ed), \Vashington, DC.: American
Association for the Advancement of Science, 1959,
publication No. 60.
46. Hollingshead, AB, and Redlich, F.: Social
Class and Mental Illness ew York: John Wiley
&amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
47. Morris, ].N.:
ealth and Social Class, Laneet 12303—305 (F
1959.
48. Dunham,
Dis—
“Anomie
and
Mental
..
order,” in Anom and Deviant Behavior, M. B.
Clinard (ed.), Ne
k: The Free Press of
Glencoe, a division of the
acmillan Co., 1964.
49. Buck, C.; Wanklin, M.; and Hobbs, G.E.:
Symptom Analysis of Ru l—Urban Differences in
First Admission Rates, ] erv Ment Dis 122 280-82,

].A., and Kohn, M.L.: Social Isolation and Schizophrenia, Amer Soc Rev 20:265—
58. Clausen,

273 (June) 1955.
59. Stein, L.: Social Class Gradient in Schizo-

phrenia, Brit J Prev Soc Med 11:181-195 (Oct)

1957.
60. Carstairs, G.M., and Brown, G.\V.: A Census

.

(July) 1955.

M.B.: Al native Hypothesis for the
Explanation of Some f Faris and Dunham’s Re—
sults, Amer J Soc 47 48-52 (July) 1941.
51. Schroeder, C.
: Mental Disorders in Cities,
Amer Soc 47 :40-47 (
1942.
52. @degaard, (3.: E igration and Insanity:
Study of Mental Diseas Among Norwegian Born
Population in Minnes , Aeta Psychiat Neural,
50. Owen,

suppl 4, 1932.
53. @degaard,
Incidence of Psychoses
0.31m
in Various Occupations,
Soc Psychiat, vol 2,
No. 2 (Autumn) 1956.
54. Ekblad, M.; Psychiat c and Sociologic
‘

19

,

of Psychiatric Cases in Two Contrasting Communities, J Ment 5 '
72—81 (Jan) 1956.
61. Dunha r
.W.: Community and Schizo—
phrenia :
Epidemiological Analysis, Detroit:
Wayne Sta University Press, 1965.
63. Leig

lot: Comm
Psychiatry,

,

lisher, 1960.
64. Leigh
ger, New Y.
65. LClgh
the Epidemi
demiology
bank Memori
b

,

.H.: “A Proposal for Research in
y of Psychiatric Disorders,” in Epi—
ental Disorder, New York: Mil‘

o

Fund, 1950, pp 128-135.
66. Krame M.; “Discussion of H. W. Dunham’s article”. 'n Causes of Mental Disorders: A
Review of
miologieal Knowledge, 1959,
New York: Milban
emorial Fund, pp 271—273,
1961.
67. Miles, H.C., et

A Cumulative Survey of
All Psychiatric Expe nce in Monroe County, New
York: Summary of ata for the First Year (1960),
Psychiat Quart 3| ‘ 58-487 (July) 1964.
68. Dohrenw , B., and Dohrenwend, B.: The
Problem of Valio
in Field Studies of Psychological Disorder, ] Abn
Psyehol 70 :52-59, 1965.
69. Benedict, P.R., nd Jacks, I.: Mental Illness
in Primitive Societie Psychiatry 17 :379—390 (Nov)
.

.

’

E.: Mental
Ment Hyg (April) 1935.
55. \Vinston,

M.; Compa t e Study of Disease
Incidence in Admissions to ase Psychiatric Hospi—
tal in Middle East, Men
ei 922118—127 (Jan)
56. Simms,

1946.
57. JaCo,

E.G.: The Social Isolation Hypothesis
and Schizophrenia, Amer Soe Re-zv 19:567-577
(Oct) 1954.

1954.

70. Hollowell,

Philadelphia
1955.

:

.A.: Culture and Experience,
niversity of Pennsylvania Press,

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

diagnosis, and discharge evaluation among
the institutions.

Method
A census of all voluntary, adult patients in residence in the institutions was undertaken in January

While Menninger and Hillside Hospitals had
voluntary patients only, a small number of those at
the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC)
were assigned by the courts for psychiatric evalua—
tion or were members of a chronic schizophrenic
state hospital group transferred for a speciﬁc research project. These patients were excluded from
the study because of their nonvoluntary status.
The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census day.
Eighteen months later the records of discharged
patients were examined to determine the social and
psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of
social class, the Hollingshead two-factor index—a
weighted score of education and occupation—was
used.“’6 The study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger, and 95 at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
The study included examination of the relations of
the social to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between institutions. These
comparisons were difﬁcult, however, because of vari—
1959.

ous methodological differences discussed below.
These difﬁculties were most marked in the intrahos—
pital comparisons and accordingly, in the analyses
of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on

the differences between institutions with citation of
intrainstitutional trends. These difﬁculties also led
to missing information for some data, reﬂected in
the tables by the varying population sample sizes.

Results
I. Methodological Problems—When

re—

porting studies from one institution, the
structure of the hospital is taken for granted
and either ignored or mentioned brieﬂy. In
TABLE

1.—Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses
Depressive reaction, narcissistic
personality
Anxiety reaction, narcissistic
personality
Narcissistic personality
Narcissistic personality, alcoholism, chronic infantile
personality
Passive aggressive personality,
alcoholism
Infantile personality, schizophrenic reaction, schizoaiicctive

type

General Classiﬁcation
Psychoneurosis
Psychoneurosis

Personality trait disturbance
Sociopathic personality
disturbance
Sociopathic personality

disturbance

Schizophrenic psychosis

21

gathering comparable data from multiple in—
stitutions, however, the differences between
institutions are accentuated. While these in—
stitutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research, and treatment programs,
they were functionally unlike in ways which
inﬂuenced the data of the study. Speciﬁc
differences were prominent in the designa—
tion of type of treatment, diagnostic classiﬁcations, and the evaluation of treatment
outcome.

Designation of Type of Treatment:
The criteria for designating that a patient
,
received “psychotherapy’ differed among
the institutions, making comparisons (lif—
1.

ﬁcult.

At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy
was designated as treatment administered on
a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist
for which the patient was charged a fee.
Sessions with a psychiatric resident physi—
cian were considered part of routine ad—
ministrative patient care.
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was
deﬁned as treatment sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities
to supervising resident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center psychotherapy was designated as the
activity of many disciplines—psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers,
nurses, and medical students. Formal
records of such sessions were not routinely
included in the patient’s record and to
ascertain which patients received psycho—
therapy it was necessary for members of the
study team to interview the resident physi—
cian responsible for each case.
2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional di—
agnostic styles made comparisons difﬁcult.
At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended
by the American Psychiatric Association,
while both Hillside and MMHC followed
different unitary systems. Several examples
of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table 1, with our suggested conversions into
categories comparable to that of the other
two institutions. These conversions provide
a source of distortion.

Arch Gen Psychz'al—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

22

Discharge Ratings of Improvement:
Ratings of improvement at the three hos—
pitals varied in format and detail. The discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was
tripartite with a separate evaluation for
social, characterological, and syndrome
changes. Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difﬁcult to assess the contribution of each factor of the Menninger
system (Table 2). For this study the
Menninger syndrome rating was compared
to the global ratings of the other institutions.
II. Interhospital Comparisons—1. Sociopsychological Variables: The distribution of
the variables of social class, age, education,
and California F scale score among the three
institutions is presented in Table 3.
A. Social Class. The anticipated differ—
ence in social class composition of the three
institutions was observed. At Menninger
Hospital the population was predominantly
upper class; at Hillside Hospital, middle
class; and at Massachusetts Mental Health
Center, predominantly lower class.
B. Age. There were no differences in age
distribution in the institutional populations.
C. Education. The populations also differed in educational attainment, with patients
having more years of education at Men—
ninger Hospital than at Massachusetts
Mental Health Center. While 41% of the
patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32% at Hillside and 23% at
Menninger did not graduate.
D. F Score. Differences in the distribution of scores on the California F scale were
also observed. Fifty-one percent of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and
only 8% with scores of 50 or above—the
higher F scores being associated with higher
degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside 31% of the patients had F scores below
30 while at MMHC only 20% were be-

2.—Comparative Ratings of Clinical
Condition at Time of Hospital Discharge

TABLE

3.

low 30.

Menninger Hospital

Thus, differences in social class,
tional attainment, and performance on the F
scale were observed. These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating socio—
psychological factors to the treatment
variables among these institutions.
2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables: A.

MM HC

Improved

Recovered
Much improved

Unimproved

Improved

Social adjustment

Character structure

Recovered

Markedly
improved
Moderately
improved
Slightly improved
Unimproved

Unimproved

Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome
Complete remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Selection of Treatment. Among the institu—
tions, signiﬁcantly fewer patients at
Menninger Hospital (43%) received somatic

therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC
(68%) (Table 4).
B. Duration of Hospitalization. The three
institutions differed with regard to patient’s
length of stay (Table 4). Patients at Men—
ninger Hospital were hospitalized longest,
with 65% of the patients remaining for 12
months or more, compared to 31% of the
Hillside patients and only 5% at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The
modal stay of the Hillside group was beComparison: for
'Sociopsychological Variables

TABLE 3.——Interhospital
'

Hillside
Hospital

Menninger
Hospital

N

87
31 %

I

II
III

Social class
l

17

13
28
28

O

5

20-39

40+

x2=

N

&lt;12

12-15

16+

121.5,

df =

3.9,

dr=

4,

100
23 %
54
23

x2 = 9.7, df = 4,

[

F score

{
I

N

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

x2

51

P

%

41
8

= 39.2, (if =

&lt;0.001.
173
19 %
58
23

95
15 %
52
33

173
32 %
51
17

91
41

P: NS

92

10-29
30-49
50-70

L

P

8,

100
19 %
59
22

&lt;20

education

28

V

=

72
3%

2O

1

x2

M M HC

51

IV

N
Age

133
7%

34
34

L

Years of

educa—

Hillside
Hospital

4,

P

%

49
10

&lt;0.05
163
33 %
50
17

&lt;0.001

76
20 %
38
42

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL
TABLE

4.—Inicrhospital Diﬁ‘ercnccs in Treatment
Variables
Menninger Hillside
Hospital Hospital MMIIC
100

Ty pe of
treatment

Psychotherapy
[

Duration of
hospitalization

Somatic
Other

21%
43
36

x2=82.,8 df=4, P &lt;0.001
NMo

&lt;7

Mo
&gt;11 M0
7- 11

100
22 %
13
65

x3=90.,6 df=4,

P

RecoveNred,1 %
evaluation

much1m-

proved
Improved
Unimproved

x2=29.3, df=

N

Discharge
diagnosis

80
19

4,

89
24 %
68
8

173
27 %
42
31

67 %
27

172
23 %

88
28 %

5

5

P

62
15

61

171
52
22

S5
54

10

&lt;0001

95
43 %
5

Schizophrenia
Affective
psychosis
Psychoneurosis 52
&amp; personality disorder
xa = 23.8, df = 4, P &lt;0.001

%

%

17

26

29

tween 7 and 11 months while two thirds
of the MMHC patients were discharged
within six months of hospitalization.
C. Discharge Evaluation. In each hospital,
most patients were evaluated at the time of
discharge as “improved” (Table 4). At
Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of patients were rated as
“unimproved” and only a single patient was
scored “recovered” or “much improved.”
The highest percentage of “recovered” or
“much improved” ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of “unimproved” (10%)
were found at the Massachusetts Mental
Health Center.
D. Diagnosis. For statistical analysis
three diagnostic groupings were made:
TABLE

5.—Duration of Hospitalization, by Age

Percentage of Age Group Staying Over One Year
Age

Below 20
20-29
30—39

40-49

50+

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

81
73
61
30
36

42

14
6
6
0
0

36
30
20
0

schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psy—
choneurosis and personality disorders (Table
4). The diagnostic proportions of patients
within these groups were similar for Hill—
side and MMHC, as slightly more than half
were diagnosed as schizophrenia and one
quarter as psychoneurosis or affective dis—
order. In contrast, at Menninger Hospital
psychoneurosis and personality disorder ac—
counted for more than 50% of the popu—
lation.

III. Intrahospital Comparisons—The lack

&lt;0.001

99

Discharge

173
36 %
64
—

23

of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each
institution, and the limited sample size
(several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than ﬁve cases) precluded signiﬁcant
intrahospital comparisons. However, the
trends appeared similar to those found in the
earlier study. Age and F score were found
related to the selection of treatment at Men—
ninger Hospital (older and higher F score
patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological
age were related at both the Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals—the younger patients re—
maining for the longest periods. While such
relationships were signiﬁcant in these two
hospitals, a similar trend was noted at the
MMHC (Table 5) where no patients over
40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20
remained longer than a year.

Comment
The patients of three voluntary psychiatric
hospitals exhibited signiﬁcant interinstitutional differences in social class and years
of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the
treatment variables—duration of hospital—
ization, selection of treatments, and dis—
tributions of diagnoses and discharge
evaluations.7 Expectations based on our
earlier intra-Hillside Hospital study were
conﬁrmed. The institution serving upperclass patients did have the longest duration
of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower proportion of
patients receiving somatic forms of therapy,
and the poorest discharge ratings among the

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�24

SOCIOPS‘YCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

three institutions. Similarly, the institution

serving lower—class patients did have the
shorter periods of hospitalization, lower
proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and
the better discharge evaluations.
It is our impression that these differences
in psychiatric treatment are related more to
differences in staff attitudes and social class
variables than psychiatric differences in
populations. The contrasts between in—
stitutions in duration of hospitalization are
great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, deﬁni—
tions of psychotherapy, and the details and
amount of recorded data. While these
stylistic differences may be dismissed as
idiosyncratic, they follow a pattern related
to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater de—
pendence on social class variables than
ordinarily acknowledged.
Such population and treatment variable
relationships are interactive processes, de—
termined both by the attitude of the physician and the administrative staff and by the
constellation of symptoms or history which
patients present. Such relationships are
marked most in those psychiatric conditions
where diagnostic criteria are least speciﬁc, ie,
where objective criteria deﬁning diseases of
known etiology are absent, as in schizo—
phrenia, psychoneurosis, personality and be—
havior disorders. Under these conditions of
perceptual and situational ambiguity, the ob—
server’s attitudes and expectations become
signiﬁcant aspects of his perceptions, classi—
ﬁcations, and decisions. A similar situation
was clearly documented by Pasamanick
et al 7 in their study of variations in
diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at
random to different wards (lid not differ in
type of admission, marital status, education,
age, or residence. Signiﬁcant differences did
occur, however, in the incidence of various
diagnostic classiﬁcations among the three
wards and among three administrators on
one ward. As no differences in the popula—
tions were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reﬂect the
attitudes of the examiners.

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis
and clinical evaluation have little meaning
when transferred from one institution to another. Literal adherence to these concepts
produces paradoxical results. For example,
Menninger Hospital with more highly
trained personnel conducting treatment,
keeps its patients for the longest time, has
the fewest patients diagnosed as schizo—
phrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treat—
ment results. At MMHC, in contrast, which
is most inclusive in deﬁning a therapist,
keeps patients for the shortest periods, and
has a higher proportion of the population
classed as schizophrenia, reports the best
treatment results.
In the absence of independent criteria for
the quality of care or the assessment of com—
parability of populations for degree of ill—
ness among the institutions, these ﬁndings
do not reﬂect the relative therapeutic
efﬁcacy of the institutions. Since the evalua—
tions are based on the institution’s own
ratings, we believe that the differences reﬂect
variations in the criteria used for evaluation
of improvement rather than intrinsic psy—
chiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study3 it was
postulated that different criteria of improve—
ment were utilized for persons of different
social background. It was suggested that the
higher the person’s social background the
more complex the criteria employed. This
has been literally conﬁrmed in the present
study, with the staff of Menninger Hospital
using a tripartite rating compared to the
global rating of the other two institutions.
Even considering the syndrome rating on
which our comparative statistical analyses
were based, it is our contention that for
lower—class persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom relief or
the patient’s capacity to resume work, while
for upper—class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as “de—
veloping insight,” or “working through one’s
problems.”
While these investigations have again
demonstrated the role of social factors in
psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly
impressed by the methodological problems of
studies across institutions. These institutions

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol

14,

Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

were selected for their educational leader—
ship and the expectation that the recorded
variables would be clearly deﬁned. But dif—
ferences in institutional style made it difﬁ—
cult to obtain comparable data. This
experience is a cue to the problems of the
conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric
therapies. The use of discharge ratings, di—
agnostic classiﬁcations, or length of hos—
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic
evaluations or the identiﬁcation of comparable populations are subject to extensive
error unless the institutions are clearly
matched for staff attitudes and style as well
as social class patterns in patient popula—
tions. These difﬁculties also extend to the
failures of scientists to conﬁrm clinical or
laboratory observations made in other labo—
ratories, for the lack of conﬁrmation may
reflect differences in populations and psy—
chiatric criteria as much as errors in the
original hypotheses. The use of the terms
“schizophrenia” or “psychoneurosis” to explore changes in psychological and biological
features of mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative results. Even were a
valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods
to describe psychiatric populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the
hypothesis. Increased attention must be paid
to the classiﬁcation of subjects by “objective” criteria rather than our present
methods, so highly dependent on institu—
tional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist—patient
interaction.

25

Summary
Population

characteristics, deﬁned by
social class, age, education, and F score; were
related to treatment variables in three
voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment vari—
ables included type of treatment, duration
of hospitalization, diagnosis, and discharge
evaluation. Interinstitutional differences
were observed in patient social class, years
of education, and distribution of California
F scores, but not age.
The variations in treatment characteristics
among institutions were signiﬁcantly differ—
ent in the predicted direction. The institution
serving upper-class patients did have the
longest duration of stay, a higher proportion
of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and more com—
plex diagnostic schemata, a lower proportion
of patients receiving somatic forms of
therapy, and the poorest discharge ratings
among the three institutions. Similarly, the
institution serving lower-class patients did
have the shorter periods of hospitalization,
lower proportions of psychoneurotic diag—
noses, and the better discharge evaluations.
These variations in psychiatric practices
followed a pattern consistent with the social
class differences among the institutions and
are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make
comparisons of diagnoses, duration of hos—
pitalization, and treatment results between
institutions difﬁcult and tenuous, and the
need for more objective criteria for the
classiﬁcation of psychiatric populations is
emphasized.
Aided, in part, by grants MY-2092 and MY-2715, of the
National Institute of Mental Health, US Public Health
Service and the Nassau County Mental Health Board. Dr.
Max Pollack aided in gathering material for this study.

REFERENCES
Hollingshead, AB, and Redlich, F.C.: Social
C lass and Mental Illness: A Community Study, New
York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
2. Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Social
Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital, J Hillside Hosp 6:216—228, 1957.
3. Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitali—
zation, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis, Arch Gen
Psychiat 1:565—574, 1959.
1.

al: The Authoritarian
sonality, New York: Harper &amp; Brothers, 1950.
4. Adorno, T.W., et

Per—

Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Social
Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Ther—
5.

apy,

J Nerv Ment Dis

130 2187-192, 1960.

N.H., et al: Social Class, Diagnosis and
Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals, Soc
Problems 10 :191-196, 1962.
7. Pasamanick, B.; Dinitz, S.; and Lefton, M.;
Psychiatric Orientation and Its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital, Amer J
Psychiat 116:127-132, 1959.
6. Siegel,

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�26

Families of Children Wit
nia
hi
hood
SchizoPhr
Early
Sc ected Demographic Informajion
L IS HENDRICKSON LOWE, MA, INDIANAPOLIS

PREVIOUS STUDIjS regarding

the

etiological importance of l‘family background
in childhood schizophr ia have produced
Kanner4
i
ressions.
and
diverse ﬁndings
has stated that autistic hildren are usually
found to have intellige , sophisticated pareducational
attaine
high
have
who
3a
ents
level. In his populatio 10f autistic patients,
grad—
school
high
the
we
of
parents
94%
and
49%
fathers
of
while
74%
uates,
of the mothers had co 'pleted college. In
another publication,3 he ‘emarked on a low
incidence of divorce :1 ng these families.
Bender,1 on the other h d, has noted that
'ong the parents
no such trends exist
of schizophrenic childre seen at Bellevue,
"

t

"

wide variety of backgrou
It has also been rep ed that a fairly
in
is
a
s
common
to
of
ratio
boys
high
these
that
and
ion,
schizophrenic pop
children are freq ﬂy the ﬁrstborn in their
male-fe—
the
lists
nder2
sibling group.
1
in a group of 142
male ratio as
7
of
under
chil
age.
en
years
schizophrenic
autistic
27
of
ulation
with
a
Phillips,6
is
which
boys,
that
noted
were
children,
also
He
6:1.
ratio
male—female
0
early
a
autistic
of
ition
ordina
data
on
presents
children. In the general opulation, the ex—
is
44.12%.6
children
ﬁrstborn
of
rate
pected
In a group of 635 disturbed (but nonautistic) children, Phillips found that
27
the
of
while
ﬁrstborn,
76.38% were
autistic children, 81.5% were ﬁrstborn.
that
to
data
these
suggest
Phillips interprets
autistic children differ from the normal
population in matters of sexual ratio and
ordinal position as do lesser disturbed chil:1
of
the
suggestion
out
dren. He points

continuum, with more vere childhood dis—
turbances appearing cw comitantly with a
higher ratio of boys 'l girls, and with a
‘l
stborn children. It
higher proportion of
should be noted that ny data on ordinal
position can be undistood better when
viewed in conjunctio with maternal age
at the birth of the chi
these various re—
Discrepancies amo
ports of data may be due to disparities in
om which samples
patient populations
were drawn. Bender nd Kanner, however,
drew their patient ample from different
population groups ,' ith respect to socio‘anner’s probably came
economic status.
largely from peopl in higher socioeconomic
groups in a unive ity community while
Bender had a wide population to draw
from in New York ci . Since this poten—
tial error is compounc d by the relatively
low incidence of c'dhood schizophrenia
in the general

.

The p pose of the present paper is
to make .available pertinent information
collected etween 1955 and 1963 in the Chil—
dren’s S :VICC of LaRue D. Carter Me—
morial Ho' ital, Indianapolis. The data on
children is compared with that
schizophre
obtained on y-\turbed children given diag—
childhood schizophrenia.
noses other
Since LaRue
Hospital is the only
nit for disturbed
residential treatmen
youngsters in the stat of Indiana, the patient population is probably representative
of all geographic areas of the state as well
as a variety of socioeconomic backgrounds.

t

Ca

Method

Subjects.—Included in the study were the children
whose preadmission diagnosis was one of emotional
disturbance, whether or not the child was admitted
Arch Gen Psychiai—Vol 14, Jan 1966

Submitted for publication March 18, 1965.
From the Indiana University Medical Center. .
Reprint requests to 64 Mercury Ct, West Springﬁeld,
Mass 01089.

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L. I. New York, 1959— 1962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts MEntal Health Center and the C. F. Menninger Memorial
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
hand the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded,

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to payu In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birth, These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratingsa In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingso
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)c Higher F scores, i.e,, greater stereo—
typy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recovered,
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that dif—
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital, To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -‘ Hillside
Hospital, the C. F° Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Bostono These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classes°
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psycho—
analytically—oriented psychotherapy,
This study was designed to determine the population character—
istics of the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and

discharge evaluation

among

the institutions,

�..2.~

METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo—
phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
statuso The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intrathospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
sizeso
The

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or mentioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institutions, however, the many differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome,
When

1. Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult.

criteria for

differed

among

At Menninger

Hospital psychotherapy was designated as
treatment administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res~
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedo
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy

designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psycho—
therapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger HOSpital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systemso Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono

�Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of im~
provement at the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)a For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
30

institutionsw

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
1. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having mOre years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Manninger
did not graduateo
c) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per~
cent with scores of 50 or above —- the higher F scores being associated with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 300
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attain—
ment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These diff—
erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables
2.

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

a) Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received

somatic therapy than at Hillside

(64%)

or

MMHC

Hospitalization:

(68%)

(Table IV),

three insti~
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)9
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per-cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of
hospitalization°
b) Duration of

The

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"e The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centerm

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diag—
disorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diag—
nostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one—quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per-cent of the
population°

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsidec Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periods“
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a yeare
The

Table

—-—\

V

�-7DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var—
iables
duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7),
The

——

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmed, The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psy—
chiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data, While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, gig}, where objective criteria de—
fining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorderso Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his per—
ceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the
examiners,

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one institution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment resultso
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutions°
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background, It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria employedo This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems.”
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been great—
ly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across in—
stitutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hos~
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populations.
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis'l to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective'' criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in—
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluationw Inter—institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted direction. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionsc
\Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the institutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
These

differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric populations is emphasizedo
Such

�REFERENCES

l.

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

Sanford,

Brothers,

R. N. The
New

Authoritarian Personality°

York, 1950, 990 pp.

J.

and
Harper and

2. Hollingshead, A. B. and Redlich, F. C. Social Class and
Mental Illness: A Community Study. John Wiley and Sons,
Inc., New York, 1958, 442 pp.
.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216—228.

Kahn, R.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization,
G
Ps h'
Diagnosis.
1959,
.,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

Sociopsychologic
Voluntary Mental
Discharge Ratings and

is 565-574.

Fink, M. Social Attitude (Cal—
Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. .leﬁﬂah_lkﬂﬂﬁ_Dlﬁ,,
M. and

1960, lﬁﬂ: 187-192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Ameri_la_£sxchiat., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete_Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comgarisons for Sociogsxchological Variables
MEnninger

Hospital
N

I

Social

Class

III

Hillside

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IIIIIKEEIIIIIIHIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHEIIIIIIII
31%

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34
.

.

IV

1

34

V

O

5

X

2

=

121.5; df=8: p&lt;.OOl

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHNIEIIIIIIIIIIIHHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJBHIIIIIIII
19/
Ag e

20- 39

IIIINIIIIIlllllﬂﬂddﬂllllIIIIIIIHHEIIIIIIIIIIIEHIIIIIIIII
Years of

Educatio

&lt; 12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
jMenninger
N

Treatment

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

.m-m-mHospital

Type of

Hillside

Psychotherapy

Hospital

Somatic

Other

=82 8
Duration
of
,

Hospitallzatlon

7

df= 4

.

.001

months

7-11 months
~11 months

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

29.3' df=4' .&lt;.001

'

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

23.8' df=4' -&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Ass

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30—39

61

30

40-49

30

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization

By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Agg

Below 20

Hillside

81

20-29

73

30-39

61

30

ho-h9

30

20

50

+

MMHg

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Menninger Hillside Massachusetts

.m---Hospital

N

Psychotherapy
Somatic

of
Treatment

Type

WW

Other

l

Duration of

Hospitalization

Hospital Mental Health
Center

9

21%

36%

2b%

h3

6h

68

36

--

8

»

.

_

.

_..W.xi:82-8:.§_£:-hz P&lt;-001
mud-Mm...“ w...»

W
7-11 months

x2=90.6; df=h; p&lt;.OOl

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

f

‘&gt;

.

M=H

Discharge
Diagnosis

.

.. .

A

_

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

10

,WWWWWr

.

x3=29.3; df=L-

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

&lt;.OOl

~~_”__M

17

26

29

WmamWNW-w‘mm
mmﬂmw

—-_.——_...__.... . ~...

�Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

i

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health

Years of
Education

'

F

Score

lBO-h9
‘

1

b1

l

50

i

38

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved

Sindrome
Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�1.

W
um.
mam.
W.
W
W
9.11.,

“at“.
.
1959.
I
law
“mu-m. 4...:
1.1.:

a.
3.

I.
5.

1.

Mun.

am.

m

W
W
man at mu:

tutu“.

mama-u.
tum-«Ina. 5.]. an nun». no.
M rm. m- we

Wm:
‘ M. In... ‘”.o
m.

3.1...

rum.

I. m m. 1.: mu:

mm

1::

I“ Maintains.
m.
Mm“ Ct WWW hail-“u “ I 7.1““ In“!
lupin): PM“... u wanna“... hum um
and Emu,
A!
195’:
“’05“;
u
Km. mt... nxm. I. «a an. 1.: um: “um.
(ﬁnal-m 3 m1.) and mum W,
1,60.
“I'd”.
m:
and
8.
I...
mm...
I...
mm.
PM».
thuﬂ'tt
Mutant. m 1“ “um n W” m mun.
1-

an.

11.1...

ram.

I.

and

H

6.

I...

m"

. mm: mm».

1959.

-..1L,.}x.;....h..

W

W

.132-

m-m.

�I. I. ‘M

mm

mmto

may. Wan-I ml "um
Mahal‘ mm. mum at. W if ”all
nun. m. mama-aim, rump-um“
at
in. “but. man a noun-mun. mu
nd unit"- «than.
h lama-um magnum“: Wm“ an
a:
:new mu m. "an
mm
smut“a: man all dun-mun a! mum ! ”an. m.
lupin!”

at «I.

mmmuwmmumm
manua- m I“
“Wham “threat
ti. New mutt-I.
no” mm a urn-mm. ”an... “no:
mm on” «mm m
”non mm
manual-n all an at
n has; manna-nu.
3.

to In

1:

b.

with

a

an

S.

«no mo mt»
“nun, a minus-nun. nu ma.»
Amman man“ um “mm. at m

Wu,

m
I» m
of

mu!“
and

no

W
“ﬁlm a mum:
abs-nun «ital-u 0:

In“... I: ”huts“.

«may.

at

m‘

�’1‘!-

banana“... a «awn :- WWI «mum

mu
“mu m

a-

«was
m
may»
to
“I.“ it. mutton at. «m1:
n:mm
mm
a ”no“ mung.
mm
mm
«I :0:- na“ uum am an» M0 mm»... a»
.1
to
atomlulu-I
m
u
an
mm
”WI.
of
Human".
a.

m
“mama.“ mun... tummuww
mwuumarmuuuwmum»
“on
mun-tn. «was. u u m u a. mm:
MﬂWM-ulﬂmmu'MW
W.
mm' “Wan” mu“ a. W h
tun-u
(ukunow“:
uﬁ
m1
Won
and

at

«a

at

mun-wwwuﬁuﬂmn.
In
runs-w
and
Ina-um.
m
an
mm“;m
m

to

n

to
I».
n u m mm mun mm». min“..Mutant: h an“. a uni mum. Mun“
u’
b.
an“
«mum
u“ u m Wins“: ”on”
than
w
'nunun'
uxwu
«Mun
nun
Mama;

“mung-M autumn»...th
and

.- taut-um}. «I aim «um

WW

o!

my

manual.-

m ﬁwﬂi-nttut 13mm.

�man-mum.» man

:mmw What

in than

m um mm.
a“
1..

was, "um". nu

It: rm.

m
W!»
M‘mp an “Oil.
“a

or

of

"tum mum

um.
mm.

um.

am.

Wam;

'0’.

in!"
0:
I24”!
an»
a: Inga!“ 1.3..“an. mu
«any man mu

mum. Wu

mus-m
a. “and.
an in him

m
mmmumomnummmmuum

wwumuu

mamwmmea.
mm: MM“.
01
um»:
Imam.
'0:th
um
Wt
‘7;
'0’.
'0'.
mm.
1/0""

��unmumm.
mmrm
nit-a ma
lunar I m. in!" «an!»
ma
nth,
:- ”unto annual Wthan: ”man“ an m
(1.6}.

no

Mm“ m mun thorn”. “mulls“ In! a 0mm

pm.mmnmmmummndumn
and.

mm

that
at
tun
not!”
«an»
an
“h
mm“
cam 1a mam «rant: n! ”’0th tan-taut nanny

hmwammmmumuummm
in arm unu- uu-u. mum...
ma um nun-um
to

~mum«cumin-nuns».non-mm“amounting“.
9.!
the
“Ian
ca.
”and...
9.10.:th
..
ma
mm

mummmwmmuommmn
loam Nth an“! mm. Mn “tutu“!!!

M
«ant an“:
with

mof

01'

tin

mutton that that «no! ”that.

nuns“. It In

“than“

tint

1-

than

in
in
n
«mum-u:
an“
“that. W!
mum
tunianat a“ much In!) 1. a man mam. nth a

than

W
WWW-what“
mammmuMum-Wmuan
nu tun
«pin-ha
M

W

“at: and not!»

rm:

«Input-natahat
nay-haw

mm

mm Wit "It“ “roam
”In“!
a: voluntary nun-tn m «an ant ”and. «than: «an.
‘1’

mom-anarmauu-mmumm

�as-

mum mm»... «I m manual: I!“
in
and
I
mm
m
mo“
In.
was
mm
m.
to it. “but man»
a ”I.“ in:
of
o:
mo
a
What. mm mama“. W:
um may” ”all.“ can a. “guano”.
or

man

�.5...

l my 0! .11 ”mm. “‘1‘ ”mu 1. mm
115!1.
than
a
mnum In
m.
3m.
and
ad
mun! mm man. «law “no“. only.
mommwu mm In!“
cum (age) can mwm by m
In 3mm.
at 1 was. «MW “a“
walnut: n m
hand. an, wan-tutu ta- 3 most“
want.
it.» ”in“: an mam In: th It“: Mann 0: am
I
“minim “aka. I.» mum m an: a»

mm

.wmumn
m.

m

m
W
“Gamma-m. mhsmmmummmu

«M'nm-mumuwmmmm
at
at
as
max
in
aw.
mum. mm

m
m Inn-am
1m «mm
man I“ mun m W a. ““7
“I. mm“:
u m.
W
m ”WM“ In“!
mm.
m
m
u

tutu“!

cu...

-

or 173

Old ’5

at

tau-«u

«r

a

(U).

“a!“

no at

«on It
pm!»

"hum
man
rum to a. mum: mm“ can. out sauna”
I. all u Wm uuuuuna. than
an
o:
”mu
«am
mm
mm.
In.“ «sauna ban. no” mum-3m. an no» In“:

a

and: “an“

m,

ﬂu

“WM W».

or the

W
mm

a“ when.

1.-

of

m

«mnupwummwcwnma
it. mm m autum- vﬂi nun- a: kins»
«mm m.

�matmartin am

m

I'm a:
gunman.
«to: he gram at out”

tn "mm m man! u
in “am“ a ”nu.
“and a mum! mm.
Mutation m “MI-pun M um auroral. «a m a

m.

imam
«nu-um
m «mum.
am
an
on
than
in
manual»
it “uh-mu “mm
and
m; mm ”aunt ”mm. a sum “it my
1|
cum-mu:
um um Manual “0 his
an an"
.8 an

and.

awn

«mom. Wan-numoumumm”
or
an
dug-nut
«an.
I“
In.
train“,
a
m
cm
“an a hat-o»
a)

m.

74.4-.2,‘

;

4%.:

s

n. ham.

:0:-

muuuu
”am my!“ 'MQMMW“ mam.
in» muu‘m. has... many a amnmauu

m
caucus.

that a

W
”M
WWWWnammuwnnw
magma m» ”as” m .mm
loan“!

A.

m “in.“ u

in.
tout-u a» m pmmwu mu.” m manna M
of "him :mamun an.» an.
n lama mun:
m 4mm a
Who“ was“ um: in
taunt. In“
n:-

an

mm
mm.

a

�ol-

M!
mm.”
mum
«nuts... .0 moi-mm il- muuu pmmm. I. m«an m m “a“.
u no human“: mm in!“
W‘ mm.

at: not

but

m
Wm
manna»
mau..
m

on
n
o:
mitt-u
«01mm
m
Mo ration“. mmxuuu. ”cal mm... an" m
m1“: sad-nu. m1 m6. at not Ion-tau an at

mm a “I

nun m Wu“
um num "mm 3»me n m mm for
annual:

mumt’a

1..

mamummuumumruum.um
at out: out.

Wc
a“ mum

W103

W“.
Inuit-(u lupin}.

Imam). manna-1

I»)

Wu

rm
m

upland

m

“(ﬂu-1‘3. M.
”1:131. minus"

«a nun

mun

Ir an “aim Moll-m.
mu
nut-m «a me 2.11“ mm mm. toms;
at
0» mm a mm I.
m1” tun-u. tuto
an a» stunt“ mural-um 1m umu01’
um the
m savanna... hm unman- pn-

nu n

m
am.

"mat u

e!

tho

m.

man

mm.

mm
In». I

that man-u

wt“

in

no.“ and «mu.

�I'.

W«an. Wow“).

an anti". nuns at
with, a monk manua- In

”Inn! as am“

W.
WI”.
W
mxmummmnmmuumu
hmmmmhmuaamtumdmm
m

unnu- Iuﬂial «4

mm
"In: In

(mm 11).

mm.

W

m.

m an CW a. luau-an
k m .10“). um: at tho um 1”“..-

a. “swung at w- mmlu “ mu! gun.

than“: «a «mum I Bah can nun the “no
“inﬂuen- u "an“ 1. mu :11.

:30.

mm
”It In

Mmlwuﬂmcum
|)WI
mu: .m- nun-tun a: Nu
mun-um.
n
m
Ian-nut m papa-«u m pun-nutty mar

W
Ila" ”In“.
at

lupin}, ”“1. cm"

”mm m
“am

In!“ cow,
t) m: M. an I.
h m manna-1 mutant».

losl'ill

«A at

Wt-

nun.
an m «unsung-

�olol.nntanun1
In
par-lasaaui
attrirll
it.
a‘ﬁatulani. Itiﬁ»ytﬁlliﬁﬂ hivtI¢:I000.ruurI It oiuanﬁton at

I)

luggaggggp

Gum.
In!»
mm
W...“
mac n m «at at m with.“ u m m at “Input“
an
5113!“:
a:
)3
«at
put
0‘1:
M
hut am.
n
wm
m In mu.

lupin:
an
n
Mm

W

6) Iggggggp

Iaullrtlaut astrlrunuun

an an. diatribmtion

«twuthIMhmmm.
It'll-lanaur
It
it!
rmmmmmuammaum.
ﬂu
“in“.
”an“
m
MM
mi,

you

an.‘

only night

in
in!

MW
an!

patﬁuutu but 1 ashram 8.1.! 30.
‘hn hints!
«out with IOIIOO at so
ii-vu

I count: bdlcﬂ 30
but!“ 30.

of

w:-

no.

that. u‘plﬂlo an},

m. m madam

m

at Qt! pcyulaﬂiunn ant. abuarvua.

twang, per «03$ ulna

n “a mu: cm:

an ”an: an

Italttluaui

31:!Ivuncou is oduatﬁiaaux u‘ﬁailncat «at pivﬂhuumnn¢ on thI 3.310. than. Qitrbvunnon puMIxt tuiﬁtua tbs hrvoﬁhtoiu
cunnnrltuu tun rnlaﬁSUI a: Quatapquhalcciaul ttutnrn ‘0 ch.
my

mm mm m mum“.

ussnltzounttr tuna! antiantl at ﬂhlllltlr Insulin: (hJi) ran
outwit nuuntlu Chutupy ﬁnal at 8:11:11; (6&amp;5) at aunt (683)
Q: etc"! in lbhlc It.

�..

m
to
rm. ”an":

«tum mun

W

usu-

(m1. 1?).
loans. at“ ‘5‘

III

manual:

m
”an“ m. minus-d

,,

.,

-,

a my

loath).
a! ”that! Stand.“ for “it" an“. It
to 31 9.: mt at the must“ manta n4

m. mod
Wiwmwmummmuuxmtmza
Guam. mmxuwctuuuxnxummm

mummmnmwaumwum
at
In
Myst-awn“;
mm
am:
«maul
m

mm

out baptist. an
(mu
mm.“ In a. “no at dun-W a
1"). M
a mm
ﬂuvial.
(:9!) d ”that: um and in “WW“ «I! only i
«11.06
pus-at
at “m Wand".
m
“an
It. “about moat-co I!
I! ”am mm”
um... (:65) an a. mu‘
a:
(m)
with! lat“ mm.
M. to“ at w:
.,

m

W

a)

‘

.,

In

_.

W,

“W"
mm.

”W“
"W“

mac. ”W“
In 11qu W3. mu W“:

W“
W:

“may nu “is: “human. “taut. mu”,

m min-mun m pmmuw mam (an. 1').
m “mu: grower-“u: it ”an" am. a».
um “all.” for 8111:!“ mm ms in m: Elm“; m but

W

mm“!
amt“:
«um
a .mmmu u “that" mums.

in" dunno! an

um

We,
haunt: haunt ”samurai: n‘ mutant?
2::

.1:

may:

�«to.
naiuunaal

(it any. than titur par oaa‘ at in. population.
Stilt I?

“m.W
I!» intrtnhocyttil otQinttual Qau’arincul wart
Ianatod'by a itrtaiv it uaﬁhnn¢a¢¢i¢01 grdblaun. lint uran-

an§~oat
c.¢ﬁmlttp:1
urttnriu
It:
lbw it. lubd1v1::aa of ﬁlpﬂll‘l‘ll; in pav‘ It. in tho hulacnno~
1‘7 of 5h. puyuiatznn viihin aleh.1alttia§lon and to It. nuan
pl. tins. x. ‘33 ntntiutical aanlynau watts; I ain't. sultan
tn‘ita auv¢ru1 0411: VI?! dhiuintn ﬂittt had uaﬁlnr you. at
thin: than :17; cut... that an&amp; yovnlttaug a catsnsuoinnr

iaost

030 tank

tltrltnnpttal
I.

tan%

It nailing!!!

.3 tin iyrvtIOita.

with that nuthnailautaal ltnstuitou nan. trundItntlur ﬁn thni than! in it: IDVIIUI tinny III. Iluurvui. Il‘hanch in! auto ot’ntitaatlcal signittauaan. 81th raunrl so
loluc‘aun at tvnainnnt. sq: umwnpln, in. an: 1 near. uurc
(bald rel-todlb Xinntnair 33:919.! (axdqr 3" light! 3 salt.

puttunts nova trigulutlr'ruoaﬁvlns Ollﬁ.&amp;ﬂ thartlr). Out I
score Ilia. at nxxxuaac.
hcucth at hooy1¢n11anaon nil oircnclacaaal can I!!!
rtlnﬁcﬁ It tutu chm Quanta!!! can Illlnlln InlpIQ|1n - tit

�W

ﬁttl

m
mm
1m.»
a.
mm.
mm
«a nuts-Inn" m nW£ in an. m lupin}...
mum“

can!“ Mismatmm (Mb 1) Mn»

tau-nu
ruched

m

Ito,

1m

5“ 15! 9‘ ”Man

m
W

than a

m.

mu t

m

the

m

or so

�.12»
aggﬁuaaggg

an man

In
Inn-yuan In

or

Watt-to
alum
m

in. mm «um-mt Manama-u:
6311mm 0: gaunt. u m min. an»)... 3: run
and
nanna‘aan
$001.1 Ullﬂl, iii It. can: in tilirtbu‘inu
it
or alum-u: r lulu can” and in ml: or m “in.“
virlnblou .. Iﬁrn‘lnl of hnI’tIIISuD‘AOI, unlocttul ﬁt
and
was.» inviting“ 0: «mu m tum".

it. qnpto$ctlau ﬁltﬁ tit tliﬁtllttOI alvvtlt
01m ”tuna mu in. th- an”! «man at am.
a mau- pm“... a!
and
tum-u an m:yln
«but... in» pm.- at ”an“ mu»
«a: pm!» Mum“ "um
in arm (an qt
«I. out min-d. Inﬂow. m mus-um amt-u
Ovulunitill.

w
mu.

W“.

W.

lint! 01.3! yatlsﬁli ovtatii Ihutﬁan parluiu at halptﬁultaliacl,
1n
3: paw-mu mm”, and mm m.

pm
cm” mmnm.

umum
M
mun
at. Will-M m mum in
It :- «r

m

mm

«Ilium

«um m t. «(tum mutt»
1n

in

min-

um:
an
win.
1.:

must“ to”... muuum 1: «am at human»
um aunt. u at. tho min“: of magma: rmuum,
mmu Quinn-u. «Imam or punt-than”. m m

«an.

and

Mt

a:

m“

«a. M. “van“.

�~13-

nkumMm'mlrrmo-um «mutumu
a» man.

mawdmmtmme-v«qu
up“ a mu cum "mun
«nun»
Mn

a-

unummmmuummuumnm.
«umummvmmtummm”mumsthe
M
nut Many
m
W1. mu. Mm mu:
m
”an“
pm!
mm,
mun
M
W

tummﬁmmmtmﬁmuauwu
than
m

“law.

in. «mu
mmm rum»
M
m pom» What man. u m,
mm.
x...
3..
in
u
mi;
who“.
ma
Mun-t.
mm»
mm
ﬁlo
which
“I!
ma It”. ”um“
IWQ mm. m
in

m

and

ummummuuuumuunmm.
ill mm mm» mu“. m m it".

usumumsuucwmmmtm
It
on
nun»
”tram «ﬂow 9. manna.

«a

MI»
III
u
“out.“ mm mm. mu
mm
pm:
a. ham m: m m «scum m We
Oh.
at
a!
u»
may
u
“an
um.
man
a.
m mu I. is. mumn'l m "um,
I. um an m Mm Mat mutton :- tho

W

W

m

�«15.

W
W
«Mm-Quantum. nmmmmm
x. my mum. mxnm'
at
Mal-at

mm

vacuum
u
m
a»
an
«sum
at
m
(5)

hwmm'tWMWMWu-num
«that ”I". Ml In has nun-m mm a a.
mum cw. rub WW «m t mm“ mm
mumcmxnmummmmumm.
MMMummnuuuMu-rmun
nun-nu: mu m mu, It to II! mun“.- an

mmomomumu$hmmwu
”but: u m "not a: m mum's my a m
mn.mummammmmmwumm
unqu- muo- u 'mm mt“. n ‘mm
at" wanna".

w
mu
“mun“ In“ «mu-m
«nu-comm.» “Mina mm.
“MI: W
WI.
manual.
«1m
M
m
m mthat“). m
“no

haw

by

m

the

win-hm

not}... at

mumm-

W:
mwmmmuunmumm. mm

for tho”

‘8.

maﬁa“

that

to
Mﬂm‘t
it
a
aw
“not” ”ﬂaw “in.
Muwuum‘wmumnama
a: mum). In a mu" than“... may
nomad“.
tummuuucmmmm.
Mu Hum, am“. nm-mum a mu at
‘

�WW
m
We W

Aspects of

in

mom

L. Kuhn.

Biol)...

Mn:

Volmmy Hospitals

Pollack, Ph.D.

Nlﬂ'micl 81.301, Bub.“

ski
Max

Fink, 11.13.”.

�WMmdanwlmth-mﬂmsmumtudat
th- Dcpu'tnnt of
Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

61m Oaks,

L.I.,

Wm

N.Y., 1959-82.

MWofﬁuauffsofﬁummmm
thathOuTtwmmc.F.MminwaHo-pimismtem1y

mm.

Aidld, in part, by grant: Hit-2092 md bit-2715, of the Nttimal
Institute cf Hontal Hulth, v.3. Mlle Health Sonics; and the
Nassau Oumty Minn]. Halt!) Bond.
*
**

m

*ﬂ

HIP

-

12/15/81!

Adm”:
:

:

mamm, Winn Hospital

chmnw,
Division of

National Institute of

Wadi,

Md.

NELLY.

Natal Halth,

of Fwd-Aim at the mam
Institute of Paydxiatry of the School cf
Unimity of Nissan-1, mo
Main,
Amend Strut, St. Louis 39, Ho.
Department

�Inthirsmdiosofﬁuwﬁmmtﬂcpatimtpopuhﬁm.

Wmmmmmmadmiﬂmtmmbumuxm

maw'smummmmmmmmmmosmam

unamtypucfdimoddbmwmmmofpoydduuic
ﬁninﬂmdﬂ'nmicatmofﬂn
mimtmﬂnnvdlabmtyofmwdngml,m,mmtmd.

WWQ).

mummhotmutmmmmrormiunm

Mind-Wefpaﬁmt'sﬂnmcesmdthcmihbﬂityofmmu

mama
WW.1m1udim MdMIpaydmmy,Wﬂm~apymomwldw
Hillsidn I-Ioapitalinlgm.

Inﬂaiahospital,avu~htyof

Minmmﬂabhtompatimtanmmsofﬂnirabmwmm.

Inﬁmeamys(¥,5)mobmdﬁutpaﬂmhmpitniudfmﬂuumt

mmmom,mmmimmmmoﬂmoffmimmm.
Mam.mmdmnmmmmlymamdbymﬂdw
Wadmimdmfavmhcmﬁmﬁsmm. mm,

m,miwmmmmmmmmitmmdfwlm

m.mm1ywpymmmmmwmm.
Mammalfwmmmommodmamofmmtypy.“

W
W,
famdinpudmﬁdagmudasinwlutimﬂwyahmia,wlmmmfmfw
California

I"

Beale

(1,8).

WPW.

1.3.,

wen often

Wiwmmy.hoap1miudfwmmm.mdmmmm
Wummmdormmmd.

Inthinmy,itwmamutadﬂntd1ffmsinpoydmmamat‘

WmmpiWMduﬂmtminfhmofmlfwmunm
fwﬂnpuﬁmtswitmnmmmothapim. Tomtmhsugguﬁmitm

�qummpmmmmmsvmmmmmummm
35.118160

tbspim,mc.P.WW1IbapitalinTcpoknmdﬁn

Wmmnwmmminamm.

mmmmumd

ﬂmﬁnmumMﬁWWpatimofdiffmtmnmmd

mamawrmdmdbitammwmmmmmmim.

Mwamm-mmdwlmmmdm,mddom

W

Whamwmmmwithafullﬁm
staff and native mm units. may miss

midnmtodhlm.

”Wr-

mmimtimﬁmwiﬂtmpmtomlclus,ago,emdmmdang

anmmcmmsﬂammmtmmofwofmt,
Wofmiunntim,dimismddismmmmmgminstimtims.

'

�WI)
Ammofmwlmwy,adultpatiminmidaminthoimtimHospitals
timmmdertdminJm,1959. WMwdeimido

hadmlmmmimmly,amnnmofmnmmmmmm
mammtm)mmimdwmmmmimicmlmﬁmor
mmmofamemzoﬁmicsmhmpimmmfaxmrwa

mmmmmtmmmm

moiﬂememmjwt.
ofﬂnirmvulmtmnm. mealifminl’amlemoomedfwam

patimtmﬂuwmday.

WmmhmﬁnMddi-WMMW

mamﬁusminlmdpsydﬂnudcfwmdﬂnm.

Forum

amma,mmW2~£WW-ammofmm
mW~mW(2;8).mmmhdmmimdof173Mmm

www.menmmrmdasnmmmmmmmomm.

WWW
mmummummmmmmuuummm.
ofﬁnmhﬁamofﬂumhlmm

m
diffmsdismmdbelw.
madam m

diffiwlt

My.

These

became of

Mass musical

difﬂmltleswmmtmdinmim~

Inspimmmm,mdmowdingly,inmm1yauofmkmovumbm

mm

diffmnm batman institution with citation of
M. diffimdtiualsoladmmiuinginfmtim

ambush will be placed on the

mm.

fermdcta,whiehismmmedinﬁnmingpopuatimmlesm1nﬁu
tables.

�1.

mmmm
Hmmpwtingmfmmimtituﬂm,ﬂnsmwtmofﬂn

mapitalwhowmfwgrmudmdthwimmdormﬁmdbﬁeny.

The

mammmﬁhmmmmmmmmn
Whileﬂmeinstitutimswmummas
mmmuplemum.

Whintawhing,mmdnmdmmpmm,ﬂmmhmﬁmuny
mmainwmmddainﬂmoedﬁndntaofmnudy. Spocificpmblm

mpmnhmtinﬁnduiyuﬁmoftypeofmm,dmticcludfmﬂaw,mmm1mt1mo£mmtmrtm.

of” “W:
mm
apnﬁmtmivad”poy&amp;wﬂumy"diffmdmgtmmmm,mkingm
mowimdafcrduigutingthxt

0.)

punbilitydiffimlt.

Atmprwmmmmdumum

Wmapmmmmnbyamffmhmfmmm

patlmtwmdmmdafu. Sesamwiﬁlﬁnpoyddxmamimtmom~

dmmdmmmismdmpatimtm.

Wt
suffpaymiattimdidmtmtptﬂm,but

At 111mm. Hoapitnl

psyduﬁmupy was Mimd as

apaydﬂatricmim.
madam: ﬂair activities to swish; midst“: physicians.

WWW.
the
At

sessions with
Ho

additimal

WWW: Natal than}! center W133; was animated

uﬂnhmtimofmydiaciplkns~psydﬁaﬂicmsidmts,poydmlogim,

mm.nmesmdmdionlatm. Pmlmmofswhmsm

�WW=

Rndmofimmtatm
mmﬁulsvuiodinfm’cmddotaﬂ. nudismmingatmmm
«valuation
for
social,
with
a
Wmlogial
bipartite
lupin]. m
"pm.
'31

W.
8!!th
W
hndglobalntilm-ddngitdiffiwlttoumsﬁuem‘udbuﬁmofeach
factorofﬁul‘hminscrsyamﬂablcn). rammmmhmm
111118163

83d

Mental Health Center

Hospital

mmmwmmgmmormmmumm.
Table

LEW
The

II

distribution of the variables of social class, ago, education

�mdcmmmhFSodesma-mgﬁnthmeimtimtimsinmmd

in'rathII.

TABIEIII

a)

menu:

hmticipawdiffminsomlclus

miﬁmofﬁuﬂmimﬁmtimmobm.

Athmingorﬂoopital

ﬁnpopulaﬂmmmﬂywrohu;atiﬂnsmghpim,middle

Maguﬂatmﬁmmmulmm 0mm,pmdominmtlylanr
class.

b)”; Mmmdiffmsinagedistrimiminﬁn

MWWW.
'm-popuhtiaualmdiffusdinadtmtmlattaim

mm:
munithpatimtshnvingmmofmtimatmhwmspim
mummmmummmm.

Whilehlpcramtofm

Mubatmwmtmhmwmol,mly32permtat
Hillsidsmdzspermtatmmdidmtmm.

mm:
CalifomiaFSulammoobsmod.

Wiminﬂndistrimﬂmofmmm
Fifty-unwantofl‘hminm

patimhndrsmbolwaa,mdmlyuia1tpcrmntwithmof
SOwabM«ﬂnh1§nvPsmboinguWwaiﬂxhigmdcm

013W.
”WMPWWMMummlymmmtm-e
Incontmt,atﬂillsiduﬂﬂrty~mpormtofﬁn

1301:1330.

���WW

ambit“

paint:
of
variablu
ﬂat
nodal
in
durum:
Win-m: 1111:.me
yomofdmtimmdaoahlclus,hutmtm;indhtrlhrﬂmot
ot than wlmmy

The

hospitals

CaliforniaFSedasmgmminMofﬂquhsw
osmium of hospitalizatim, «mm of Wits and 613W
ameddiMavaluatimsc?)mmﬁmthatﬁumsﬂtutimsmﬂzgwclaaspatientsmuldmmlmgmdtmim

«We

diagrmcs mdmemplex
of stay, ahignrpmwrtim
forms
somatic
of
waiving
patimts
schemata,
pmportim
War
diagnostic
each omfirmd. Similarly,
and pmst die-m ratings
of
the institutim serving lwer class patients wimed shame» perm of

W,

m

hospitalization,
Wartime
evaluatims.
low

diam

of

W,
We

and

better

Itiamimpmanimthattﬁusediffmsinpsydﬁmmt-

mt an

related to differences in staff attitudes than to
in populations. mu contrasts batman institutions in

more

611’st

Workmapitannﬂmmmt,mmmmludtyofdhgmﬁc

(Ii-m
mamuIdmtofnmd-dm. mmmticdiffm
WMWumlyidWmﬂosMﬁuyfonwapattm
Minions.

evaluation, daﬂnitimc of psyemthumw,

antosanialdﬂfmnm mhmwiﬁam‘vmfhdim.

and

�inﬁmcpsymiaudamitmmdmﬁawituhmm
specific, 1.0., when objoctiw

mm

defining

W

of Imam

,psydxmemismdpuvamnty

dmdmlmbmtyﬂum's
the M18

attitudesmdupectatiombm

This
classificatim.
md
pumpkin:
form:

321qu

wwmmbymmdc,mnitzmdkfm(7)inmnudy

«mmwmmammumm. MW

mmmhassigmdtodiﬂmmdidmtdﬁfwinw
Simiﬂamt
m.odmudm.agcormisdmcm
ofmum,mita1

diffmmdidm,mm,inﬂuimimofmdimu

m1..bhm1ngnrﬂoopitalmmmsthighlytmimdpmmlom-

WW,Witspntimtafwmlmgutdmwhufmt
mﬁmtndimoudauclﬁmmia.

Myanitmpormmw

�Wt
mamm,mmpsmmtwmmm,
malts.

Mm,inm,

uhieh

ismtimlusivcin

“MGQMCWWMW‘WWMMOGWW,
minim Wutic efficacy
ofﬂnimtitutims. Wedonothamindepmdmtcrimiaform
Thu” findings do not mﬂnct

than

quﬂityofam,mﬂummto£mpmb111tyofpopulatimam

motinmamﬂnimﬂmim.

Simeﬁnavaluatimm

Wmﬂninﬂitutim'smminga,mboummmdiffemm

mﬂaethﬂaﬁmmﬁmmmmwfwcmmofimmt
mm

than my intrinsic maxim-10

In our

initial

mm.
it

3111316: study (5)

was

postulated that

diffmt

«mm
mm 1W1: m
Itmmsmmtﬁnhimmmm'ssocial
utilized for poms of

of

W.
WWmmhxmwimwlmd.

social

Thishashm

nun-llyomﬁmdinmmmtamdy,withm'am1ma

'Wmummdmmngﬁngotmmmmw
tints. Mmidcmmoymmﬁngmmdxmmdw
“WWW“,itiswmtmdonﬂutfwlm
Mmmmapttommwmmhﬁmtom
unofwﬁupaﬂmt'smpmitytommm,whihfmwm
palms 6!. criteria
mama-'3 or

Wis.

mm mm

such

ain't

will): intmgiblos

mm."

as "developing

�mummmdmmmmmmmdmemuo:

Wifwmmpaymmicw,mmhmmﬂyw

bymmﬁmdologimlpmblmofatwiumsimtimﬁms.

Thane

imﬁtndmmumfwﬁnbcmﬁamlumpmdﬂn

Wmmmdmbmmdmmmwmd.
obtain

mm
Mammuammﬁnpmblmofﬂumdaulm

65.1ch

data.

But

in

style

made

it difficult to

mmblc

ofmantiwstaﬁatim,apocidlyinﬁuommimofmmimie

Mics. Mmofdismmﬁm,dimﬁcﬂudﬂaﬁmsor

Mdmitmuﬁmumminmmmwﬁu
to extensive
of

warm
imtitutims
mien

countable popuhﬂms

the

m

clan-1y

m swim

mm

m

for staff attitudn cad

styhumllusocialclasspaminpatimtpomlaﬁom. cholicve

mmfmmmommﬁufaﬂmofmimﬁsummﬂm

mbmmrmdmmimmmmmmmw

sdmbmduudbymmiwmulu. Manudobmatimtobo
Whamlnbomtmy,ttnmﬁmdsmmtavaﬂablctodaym

mmmmmmmmrwmmmm.

�-13-

Inam‘asod

attunticn must ho paid to tho althodblogiaal prcblumn of

classifying

mjom

mlthads, so highly dnpgndant an

m

criteria
institutional

by ”objcativa"

than the present

and obonrvur

attitudul

mmmmmmmammm-pmmm.

�Wmmnsxm
1.

Inﬁmowydmmic-mmmmgmﬁtnn,

WWmmammmmmtm-hbm.

Populatimsmdcﬂmdbyaomlelus,m,adumtimmfsm.

mmmhmmtypoofumt,dmﬁmofhmpitmadm.

Wwﬂmmmﬂm.
2.
3191131121“:

inurhwﬁtutianl

diffm m

obscured in

Wﬂmofpatimtsoahlelus,ymofodmutimm

diuudbuﬁmofcuifwml‘m,butmtago.

mmmmmwummmum
timmfmmbouigﬂﬁmﬂydiﬁmtinmpmdicmd
3.

dim.
It.

mmmmymammmnmnm

mumtwithmmclusdﬂfmwmgimﬂmdmsmdm

thuidiosynmtie.
5.

matrmmmmmmummmof

W,mumof)mpimnmim,mdmammultnbam

mmwﬁmdtmmm,mmmdfmmobjwdw
«imamimdmofmmﬁmsismim.

�REFERENCES

1.

Adorno, T.w., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,
&amp;
New
Brothers
York, Harper
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,

1950.

Two-Factor Index of Social Position,

Hollingshead, A.B.:

mimeo—

graphed publication.
Mental
and
Class
Social
F.C.:
Redlich,
&amp;
New
John
Sons, Inc.,
Wiley
York,
Community Study,

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

1958.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

1957.
216-228,
g:
§g_p.,
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,

l:

565—57h, 1959-

(CaliM.
M.:
Attitude
Social
and
Fink,
Pollack,
R.L.,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
Dis.,
J.
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
fornia Scale)

Kahn,

122: 187-192, 1960.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,

Psychiatric OrientaTreatment in a Mental

S. and Lefton, M.:

tion and Its Relation to Diagnosis and
1959.
127-132,
Amer.
J. Psychiat., llé:
Hospital,
Siegel, N.H., Kahn, R.L., Pollack,
and Treatment in Three

M.

and Pink, M.:

Social Class, Diagnosis

Psychiatric Hospitals, Social Problems, 10:

191—196, 1982.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

~W‘_

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Improved

Unimproved

Unimproved
Syndrome
.._.W

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Markedly Improved

W-

�III

TABLE

InterhosEital

Comparisons for SocioEsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

;

Hospital

Hospital

Education

17

’

(92)

N

3

Score

1

i

’

F

Massachusetts
Mental Health

;

10-29

1

3o-h9

W7

51%

i

’41

g

(163)
33%

50

10

g

i

76
20%

1

'1

38

}

50-70

8
1

i

17

g

M

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Massachusetts
lHillside
iMenninger
Mental

Health
Center

IHospital ‘Hospital

‘Psychotherapy

of
Treatment

Type

Somatic

h3

Other

Duration of

Hospitalization

36

’

7-11 months
1

months

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

Improved

61

’
.

'Unimproved

10

%

I

9

.

-

_

mw.,,__,‘&lt;2=29-3s df=1v

ﬁanQwawiwﬂj
I

Discharge
Diagnosis

tr-‘a-m-th-A
_

...-A.Wn‘.m

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

.W---

85
Sh%

1?
26

29

”-

-.- —-”“—

w-

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

h2

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

hO-h9

3O

20

50+

M9

�‘— ‘7

-w vuwlr-u'rﬂmmm

—-u--

“Tm—“vii

W
Hm:

W.

21, man

911.13.

Hill-M- Wu}.
P. 0. Dan: 33
man Odes. the You:

W81
,
mm. mm
mmmlht:
MWWIMBWMbyaWo-n
I
whammmm'mmmmmmrmunm.
Midwinbutlmzldlﬂuewrymm
IMMMM
Mtﬁzhfwwblmw . Wumﬂulntdmﬁmfm
Wh.metMtoajml,ImﬂAlihto$smm-d
Hm,I
mmmmwmuwmmm.
singlubmmtittoamofﬁujwmmmwm
to .
81

FILE.

‘

‘

mm,mmmqumummxwmt
mwmumwtm-mmdtmjmw.
WWW.

ma:

�ﬂv

psychiatric treatment,
haMﬂm

and
research

December 2h, l96h

Dr.

Max

Fink

Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
Shoo Arsenal St.
St. Louis, Missouri
Dear Max:

(E)

/
(:&gt;

let,

the
have
reread
I
In reply to your letter
to
and
objections
my
original
paper on sociological aspects
the
skirts
I
feel
no
altered.
it
in
way
this paper are
whole problem of diagnosis which Nat in a previous paperwhich
and
than
social
class,
has shown to be more ;important
True,
variable.
be
crucial
a
VA
showed
to
I in the
paper
disturbed
more
severely
younger
same
institution
within the
of
time
period
a
and
longer
for
kept
patients are treated
and all this is relative to the philosophy of the
the
in
not
reported
at
all
is
This
viewpoint
institution.
paper.
form.
in
present
its
of
in
publishing
favor
not
it
I am
Should you have some specific need for seeing it published,
removed.
was
name
my
providing
no
objection
I would have
collaborate
to
want
should
you
authormanship,
of
Speaking
variables
and
psychological
EEG
and
psychiatric
on the
findings
I would have no objection.
My best wishes to you, Martha and the kids for a Joyous
New Year.
have
him
I
and
Turan
to
tell
Please give my regards
ordered a copy of his book.
Sincerely yours,
of the

10m»;

MP:gp

Pollack, Ph.D.
Senior Research Associate

Max

�m

21, 196‘!

mmmrmtmmmgm-ormw;md
fdﬂuMdmmm-Jmlofwmommﬁa
Mﬂlhdmlafhyuhhm. mﬁwmhﬁn
”magma-mum. hmmhmyw.

and:

Enema-mu
cc:

Pollack Ph.D.
Nathmial siegel, Ph.D.
Max

�MONTEFHMHCHUSPVRHJAND MEDHLMACENTER
111

EAST 210TH STREET. BRONX, NEW YORK 10467. TELEPHONE: 212/TU 1-1000

January 19, 1965

Fink,
Director

max

M.D.

Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
suoo Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:

I think the paper is fine, and would
touch it as little as possible. Your choice of
Journal is excellent. For my part, go ahead

and submit

it.

The only change concerns

the

here - "Mbntefiore Respital and
Mbdical Center" and the revised address as

revised

name

shown on

this letter.

It

to see you and I
pleased that you are doing well.
was good

am

Best regards to Martha.

Sincerely,

RLK:FB

Rdbert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Head, Section on Psyology
Division of Psychiatry

�DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION. AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
BETHESDA. MD. 20014

December 31, 1964

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
AREA CODE aoI
TEL: ass—mo

In reply refer to:

M-TMR-SS
AIRMAIL

Dr. Max Fink, Director
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal

Street

St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:

I was pleasantly surprised to see the paper on "Sociosociological Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals" again. I was
really delighted that you resurrected it and have taken responsibility
of submitting it to one of the journals that you listed. I have no
real preference for one of various journals that you mentioned. I would
think it would be most unlikely to be published in Psychiatry, but I
am sure you share this opinion since you listed it last in your order.

In all honesty, in rereading the manuscript, I found it to be much better
than I remember it. Most of my comments are of a stylistic nature. Here,
however, I would bow to you as the collator of the document to use the
style that you prefer. My own penciled comments are, however, on the
paper.

V/

I think the main contribution that this paper has to make, and should
make, has to do with the methodological problems that are involved in
doing cross-hospital studies or in doing hospital studies within the
same institution over a period of time. As you indicate in the paper,
on page 4, that when one reports studies from one institution, the
structure of the hospital is either taken for granted or ignored. Cer—
tainly, we should be elaborating on this in great detail, and the
methodological aspects of doing a study, such as the one we have done,
Should occupy a major area of the report in its own right. For this
reason, I am not sure I would report methodological problems as we have
done on page 4. I think that it should either occupy a place of its own
in the discussion or might indeed exchange status with "AH Interhospital
Comparisons on page 4, and become the "A" category, or interchange and
make Interhospital Comparisons the "#1" category. Most of the things
that we want to say are in the paper but, as I have indicated, I am a

�2.

little

unhappy about interweaving our "findings" with the "methodological

not being our intent in the original investigation
in
the
also,
report.
more
I,
important
the
I
being
think
...and, yet,
would
I
of
the
author
be
try to
should
senior
paper.
believe that you
own
in
and
autonomy
right
its
give
problems
it
methodological
the
spotlight
Section."
"Discussion
Section"
the
in
"Results
or
done
in
be
the
whether this

difficulties"...the latter

Cole
in
Jonathan
with
be
will
visiting
Please let us
the
evening
want
on
spending
us
to
plan
I
certainly
Washington again.
schedule
I
will
on
advance
notice
this
have
we
a
and
if
little
together,
know when you

my

time accordingly.

My

best to you

and your

family for a most happy 1965.

Sincerely,
Nathaniel H. Siegel, Ph. D.
Acting Chief, Social Sciences Section
Training and Manpower Resources Branch
National Institute of Mental Health
Enclosure

�M

L.

W.
liﬂunhﬂ.&amp;hﬂn1,Ith"

Kin. $.11...

MI!

nu!

Nu

m.

21.0.“

31.9.

�-n

mmw

—

vvr-nwr w)v-x&lt;v-'r

v

-,

—

1‘... er—‘u‘

-~

‘

m-vm.~—~v---ww—WVW-"— av uwvwx ':vtwv-‘uwvwav&lt;&lt; -... . &gt;rv—zwv-Inl“ . wt. u-vww-wmw—m—m‘ vv'vi'ﬁ‘mrr w 4w.—’wn’.~w—V'WWV

MIMmm-Mhmumwa
mwdwmm.mmm.
3.3..

mm.
m.
mummmc.r.mmwnwmhmmuy
m,mm.wmm~mmm~m.dmm
Mahatma). mmua. muss-mm; mun

mwammme-m
Lain.

mmmwam.
mmuumm.munmmm
Cmm: wmsmnwzm.
mm".
a:
mm mm mm mm.
W.
I“
3.2.

aWﬁdeW
memmammua:
mmwaw.m
mm.st.muis.m.
0‘

m.

Md.»

ray-12mm

�-

.

.

.

v.

v.,.‘,'.‘.- «r

«

:Vw’v mew—m—x— wwtr-rm'w-‘Mw—.nn-nwwvwwwmmw-v-v ... .. we» ~v .... *IJ- ‘v-r'
,

1:-

««..‘«.———»W.-.m»—7w....yu. nr__.4.;- “M...

——~m41‘7-~

-...—

n. Vr .. .

nmuwumwmmmmm
”1(1er

Wmmmwmmmm
mammawmmmwamwmmpmﬂnam
WW“). “W“ﬁwmﬂ”,

mam/1m [Yd/W
“'3"

MW!WMMNW%:W°¥IW.M 5 dz]
Wm
mam-rm.
Wren-(1.5).
.0.,WW.
ﬁr7sf‘“-“
‘

�.-—

wru- vv- "v... «- WMIwn—w

&gt;06." :u—

‘mkm:“"mvﬂw-w5-—rmw~r~vvb w,

wn-‘W-‘wnw-qm --. rtmmmnﬂ-FII .:- ;w~w-w——»,w-——W w...“ “-— v.W»—w——.~v— "ﬂ.Av—-HV»W‘WW‘W'WW"W—WI

“a“

Wummmdmmvmmmmmmm
mmm,mc.r.mmmummmmmmm
Wammmmmm. mmmmumm

WWW
WWW

ummmmmwmamwmm
WMMM
M M’Mmﬂ
'

[’2‘be (if #9»;

0/15th

aha/Me

.

whammmamnmm
wmmmmmmu.

mud-Wm.

mwmwwmmnmmmm.
MMWWmWMWWd
mmmmtmwmmmwnm.m.mumurm;

mm.

�,,,

—.»

,

.W—w ----~v-—-r-'

»*»-"—

"v

M

'-

wm;wmvmxv'"#w—

‘m-F-mu '«

"Hum—W.

«va-rn-w “.m—w—‘wvmmwm
»

.

\mer-r -m
a:

..

m

Amdmmmnammmmmmmmtm-

m~mmm,mm. WWMWWW

mmmw.nwmdmummw
MﬁWWmWWhMMWMw
denWWnn-Wmmwm:
WWW.
mmmmmwmm
«Mam-mm. mwmrmmmmm
Wanting-mushy.

mammmmmmmamm. MIW

www.mmummmmm-ammmdm
“Wummtﬁsymmmﬂmmhtddlnm
«www.mnmmmssnmmmmmm.
mmmmmmmmmorm'mmmm

”mmwummmmuwummm.

MWthm.m9£mW
MMMMMmWinm-m
mama-am.

www.mmmmy.hmmmammm

Mummmmmmmmmmama

mwum’mmmm
WWW
www.mummmjmvnﬂénmmmm

“a.

-

�. WV

‘ — ,- w-wmu. “kn-"n“,

A-

ham-w.”- VWWW—wmuwwum—mm

W
W
1-

mmmnmmimﬁmim.mmdﬁn

mimwhmfwmmdﬁwiwdwmdmm.
mmmmmmmmmmmn
mmmﬁmmum. mummmmmu

an

mumm.mmwmm.mmmly
mummmmwwmwmm. Wham

mmmmmmmorwammwmum»
ﬂm.mmmmﬁwm.
mmmmmmm

WWW
IWMMWMNWWMW,MM
met.
umwmmmmmum
«0

Wmummwuwwmmm
”twang-anus. mmummpmmammmm
Wmdmmwmm.
-Aemm1ammpwmymwmuummmmm

MW“MMM.M
nan-mm
mwmvmuwwmmmm.
cumin-aim.
Minimum.

'mmwmmmmmmmw
ummammmuwcmm.mmm.
mm.mmmm. mmamm
’

�,

n-

.m..

WV..—

Ww~

-

mw-«WWWWIWwv—mm wwmmw—mm

“Ir-V."

I. ‘“

mmmwmmmm'amwmwm
mmmwttmmmmummm
mW'mm’WwMW.
b.)

M:
wmmmmwmmm
MWWMWWMMWWV.

difﬁcult.

mmwmmmmmmm

mmmmmmmmnzwmmwmm
Moan-

mmmwmwmmmmm.

Wand’mm.

'1'th I

mmmmminmmm. mmmmmnmmm
WmmmuumasmmmumMammg'mm
Mammmmwumtmmm
“WW.

mmmmttmtmmmmmmdw
imamwwmmn).-MMsmmWW
mummmmmwmmmuw.
TIMI!

2.

mmmmmmmdmm.m,mam

�V v. .,_VW._..,_~_..,...._.V._

mwm wry“

r—‘um'wrp—

.

wwwnvmmm

NWFMWWmMMWhW
mum-m.
mm

mwmmwm
W:
.mmaunmmmmmw. mmmm

TITVZWL“

a)

@Wmmnywm;ummmw.m
:prj’ cam.
Mg'unwmmmm,mmxym

$0319”)

”ﬁg?
3":
3’1

if:4314,4'ZWMW

'0’
‘

.,_-

‘

Mmmmmmmmm
initiation-1
bug:

W.
pmmmmwmmm
,

m.’umwmmmamummmm
magma-macar-

mummmmm.
mwm.wmmmmm,cmynwmn

am
mm: Whﬁndmwmmm

unma- m 2: went

mad: mm.

mama-«aw
W‘rmmmm.

mmrmmm,mmymwmuimmd
sou-mu

mmrmmmammm
mm.ﬁmmmmdﬂn

aim
murmmmmmammmme
him”.

{

�.‘r “pm... 9

W mr—

mmmﬂwmmm‘

~wz.

.

‘-...-

WWWW-

mm‘mm

._

.

m,mwmm1nmm.mm
Wmmmmrswsmm.

W
W

”mus

WMtnmdwm-Wmmd

wrmumwmmm
mm.
s«

0

’

mm “W: mmm.nmmmuy

mmuumwmwmmmmw
mnm&lt;m3wmcammm.

mmmmm

m
«wwmmmww.ummotmm
w

wumnmuummmummm.

mmmwmwm.muuwmum

mmmwsmmnmwmmm
mmmdmmmammmmm
0mm.

mmmm—mwwmmmw
ummmuwm.
A,

Inmmlymmtum

mummwmuﬁwmm.
mm
mﬂmmugo
.

M:

WWm
“mawmmlyucMoMmAm‘
(19» of

'W‘wmw. mmmﬁw
memu-ummmmmu
(M)~mmnmywwmmm.

W”

MWWMW
Wm”: mm.MuW,mp-m
6)

mg:

mmmuuummm. mWW

mamummmm-mmmmmm,

m.—

�__

.

.

w~vwmvwﬁﬁn

mmwmwmmmmmammamm

www.m'w.

mammarwxmmmmmmmmm
WWW
mummmwmm.
mmmmmmgmm.mmmammm
Wmmctmw.
mmwmum,mmawmmmm

—-

I'm

.V-

lath-mm. mmrsmmmmmmumm

w.

.ﬂww‘

«mummmﬁmwmmmrmm

.

mmmmmwnmrmmnm.

demmammammnmm
Wum.mu~mmmummm

mmmpmuwmtmm
quh..-h1mtrmdm'mdd§nmmbhﬂwtmm
m-mw,mmammwmammw
mummiod.

'

Mam.

WV

��...

ww—nw—va—&gt;vwmmmm www.mmww- m“ mv—m—w—u—‘mwnwﬂ.

.—

“.mwmw

._‘ u...

_~wm.,

”minimum-mummy”

an.wmwﬂnndmbdﬂnm
mmmumwbymmmmmamw
mmmmmmmwmmmm

”.mmwwmmmmum

Mum.th.W1-NWW
mumuuﬁumdmmmm
“WW
dmwtymm'ummmmmm
mmmmmmmm‘mum. mammal-s

MWWW1&amp;.MHMWU)M‘MM
dWMWdMnIWMMm. MW

”MWWmmmddmﬁﬂu-inw
Want
www.mmm.m.mwm.

www.m.mmmmormm
mmmmmmmmmmm.
ithmIMymtﬂm-cﬂmmminmmnﬁm,m
A:

Wmmmmmdmmm.
MWWJWl-wdmm
”HWWMWMmmmmW.for
ummmmmummmmnmm.
uni-.WwﬂlhﬂﬂnMMYWw-RMW

www.mmmmmmuummm

WW.W{MM:“WWW

�Wan-alts.

nm,mm,Mhmmn-mm

mam.mmmmmmm.
«mmammngMu-mm.
mmwmammm.
mmmmmam‘nwm
arm-imam. mammm-Mdmmm

mutyofm.mmmtdmutyofmnmfw
manmmmmm. mmmm
mm'mmmmismm.mmmmmam

“mummmwrwmmdw
mummmmmwm.
ammwmmmc;),1tmwwm«m
mmawmmmmwmmmn
mum? Itmwm,wmmmmm
nmllymﬁminmmmﬂy,wiuaW‘sMn

Mummmmwmotmmmmdm
um.

“MMWWmMMWw
mummw.1tummmtmm

“mummwwwmmmm
«wamm'umtymmm;mmwm

mﬁnwﬁmﬂMMWWluuﬁ-«W
W“.w"mkimﬂmm'u mm.“

��“Vi—p.-.— «......,.“ym.—

“n WW... 7,“.u Irv-"ﬁrm“b'tw www.m-m

a».

.umw w», -..m--m.-.\mu~ urn—7”." w, m 7..” n- »~ .:.r~—nremw.n

Wme-mmmmmma
mmwmwmmmmmm

mum-.mmwmmmmwmmim

mmwmdmmmm.

�N"

a

man-wwmwrw

Wv-'ﬂ‘9""¥’:ﬂ1ﬂ'1w"v"’w

7)

‘

v.

w;1mmw‘n:-glm

v
,-.v.-

:.
v-y.

mun-rme

_,.

~

a.

n;'WK:=Vm4—_wr_nw-ytw;wtuv7~n.&gt;l.-.

war,

=W:

WW

EMWWW‘RR.
WWWWMWW.
1.

memmm.m.mmmrm.
MMNWWWMW.WMWWM.

WWWWWWQ
Wamwm.mdmm
WMWFM.MM*.
2.

MWMWWmmMm
ammfmbhcimmmrmmmd
3.

am.

mmmmmammmam
Wﬁmmmmﬂmmmﬁmmdm
Ii.

MWuwa-mw.

mammmmwmmummw
m.mawunuum.newmum
mmmtum.mmmmmwmdw
B.

wwwmmamnw

�REFERENCES

1.

and
D.J.
Sanford,
Levinson,
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E.,
&amp;
New
Brothers
York, Harper
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,
'

1950.
2.

Hollingshead, A.B.:

Two-Factor Index of Social Position,

mimeo—

graphed publication.
3.

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

Community

Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and Mental
&amp;
New
John
Sons, Inc.,
Wiley
York,
Study,

1958.

h.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

Hos2., g: 216-228, 1957.
S.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
and
Diagnosis,
Ratings
Discharge
of
Duration
HOSpitalization,

Kahn,

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
6.

l:

565—57h, 1959-

(CaliAttitude
Social
R.L., Pollack,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
J.
Dis.,
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
Scale)
fornia
M.

Kahn,

and Fink, M.:

129: 187—192, 1960.
7.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,

tion
Hospital,
and

8.

and
to
Diagnosis
Relation
Its
Amer.

J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, l9S9.

Siegel, N.H., Kahn, R.L., Pollack,
and Treatment

Psychiatric OrientaTreatment in a Mental

S. and Lefton, M.:

M.

and Pink, M.:

Social Class, Diagnosis

in Three Psychiatric Hospitals, Social Problems, 10: 191-196,

1962

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered
A

Markedly Improved

Much Improved

Improved

A

!

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Unimproved

Moderately Improved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comgarisons for Sociopsychological Variables

i

I

Social

Class

Years of
Education

III

Menninger

Hospital

Hillside
Hospital

:
I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
gMenninger Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health

iHospital

Center

'

of
Treatment

‘Psychotherapy

Type

68

Somatic

8

Other
1

.

_ﬂ,

__

Duration of

Hospitali—

zation

7-11 months
1

months

Improved

.--a-—u.~...w

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

lO

a,”

Discharge
Diagnosis

,

months

Recovered,

Discharge
Evaluation

~__imiu_i_.,i_.__.::-

.

”13:29-33
W

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

df=h~

5,1001
I

‘

”WWW”
85

22

1?

26

29

!

I

S2

1

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

£52
Below 20

Menninger

Hillsidg

81

he

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

ho-h9

30

20

3422219.

�'

&gt;

%&gt;

This study was done when the authors were associated at
the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hespital,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y., 1959-62.
Pal/sue aux!

KIRIM“
cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts
Health Center
the
is
The

acknowledged.

and

C.P, Menninger Memorial Hospital

Mental

gratefully

Aided, in part, by grants MY—2092 and MEI—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

** Present Address: Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore Hespitalaw*
’
'
{hxxﬁrtﬁF-itﬁfr
IO‘NAZI
g“ QM? 1.14:
0M yNL
nan
:
National Institute of Mental Health,

'M,

-ﬂﬂqmam pn--~~r~Ognv m.

Bethesda,

Md.

Department of Psychiatry

at the Missouri

Institute of Psychiatry ef-the-SChool of

Medicine, University ot’ Missouri, suoo
Arsenal Street, St. Louis) an, Ma, 6399'"!
,4

:9,

�In their studies of the

psychiatric patient population,
Hollingshead and Redlidh have reported significant relationships between an'
individual's position in the social class structure and the
of treated
New Haven

illness, types of diagnosed disorders
administered.(;%.
treatment

patient
.

The

and kinds and duration

W

of psychiatric

influence of the economic status of the

the availability of treating personnel, however, was not excluded.
Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of hospitalized

on

#‘Fﬁ‘

.

'

IﬂL

srﬂwu‘

patients independent of pateent‘s finances and the availability of treatments
were undertaken at Hillside Hespital in 1957. In this hospital, a variety of
treatment modes, including individual psydhotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive
therapies were available to

.

.

.

.

all patients regardless of their ability to

pay.

(Eglgé
In these surveys
we observed

that patients hospitalized for the shortest
periods were older, had less education and were more often of foreign birth.
These older, less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive
therapy and received more favorable clinical discharge ratings.

In contrast,

younger, native born and more educated patients were hospitalized for longer

periods, treated primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratings.
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy, the
'

California

F

’15’

Scale (1333. Higher

F

scores,

i.e.,

greater stereotypy, were often

in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis, who were referred for
convulsive therapy, hospitalized fOr shorter periods, and more often were
rated as much improved or‘recovered.
hen,
(gram)
e'
In thzs surveyglit was suggested that differences in psychiatric treat—
ment among hospitals should reflect the influence of social factors as noted
f0und

fbr the patients within Hillside HOspital.

To

test this suggestion

it was

�decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions

Hillside Hospital, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hespital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston. These institutions were selected
mm» Ww-Mans.:qum-W nag-MW

:

with the expectation that they served patients of different social classes.and-

provide custodial care. Each

supervisory

staff

and

is a residency training center with a full

active researCh units)

time

emphasiqgugsychoanalytically—
They

oriented psychotherqua
This study was designed to determine the population characteristics of

the three institutions with respect to social class, age, education and

score;

F

to relate these characteristics to treatment variables of type of treatment,
duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the in—
and

stitutions.
M'MWW,.,L..««Ila-mm?”

W/

“”‘MW‘WWW ”‘W

“’

m "' “

t4"

"M"

‘ﬂwwmwww

”‘

W

“m

«a

,

N,

WWW‘W,MM

——

�/
A

METHOD

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in

residence in the institu—

in January, 1959. While Manninger and Hillside Hospitals
had voluntary patients only, a small number of those at the MassaChusetts Mental
Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the courts for psydhiatric evaluation or
tions

was undertaken

of a chronic schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a
from
because
excluded
the
These
study
were
researdh
patients
project.
specific
of their non—voluntary status. The California F scale was scored for each

were members

patient

on

the census day.

Eighteen months

examined
were
of
records
the
disdharged
patients
later

to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure
of social class, the Hollingihead 2—factor index a.weighted score of education
used(g;ii;.The
and occupation was
study population consisted of 173 patients
—

—

at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
social
of
the
to the
The study included examination.of the relations
psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between institutions.
These comparisons were difficult however, because of various methodological
differences discussed below. These difficulties were most marked in the intra—
hcspital comparisons, and accordingly, in the analyses of psydhiatric variables
emphasis will be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
at Hillside,

100

at

Manninger and 95

intrainstitutional trends. These difficulties also led to missing infbrmation
1&amp;6/34 6, #2,
for some data, whidh is reflected in th varying population sample sizeslénrthe
4ﬁﬁﬂxeu

�RESULTS

I
Methodological Problems

A‘

When

reporting studies from one institution, the structure of the

hospital maybe taken forgranted and either ignored or mentioned briefly.

'W 1,,

e

comparable
gathering

gr;
m, _ M ”1111111....”
institutions
While
were selected as
these
data from.multiple institutions,
.

in teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific-problemscygf4LAt-Lk*
comparable

were prominent

tions,

in the designation of type of treatment, diagnostic classifica-

and the evaluation of treatment outcome.

criteria for designating that
differed among the institutions, making come

Designation of Eype of Treatment:

1)

a patient received ”psychotherapy"

[Sous

parehti=ay

The

difficult.

At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was designated as treatment

administered on a prescription basis by a

patient

was Charged

a fee.

staff psychiatrist for

whidh the

Sessions with the psychiatric resident were

con—

sidered part of routine administrative patient care.
'At Hillside Hospital psydhotherapy was defined as treatment sessions with

Staff psychiatrists did not treat patients, but
No
additional
resident
physicians.
restricted their activities to supervising
a psydhiatric resident.

fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was designated

aucha‘
functiggrof

psydhiatric residents, psydhologists,
social workers, nurses and medical students. Formal records of such sessions

as the

many

disciplines

-—

�which
ascertain
and
record
to
in
the
included
patient's
were not routinely
team
members
the
of
study
for
was
received
necessary
psydhotherapy it
patients

to interview the resident responsible for eadh case.
made
comparisons
diagnostic
styles
Individual
institutional
Diagnosis:
evaluative
the
multiple
employed
diagnoses
At
Menninger
Hospital
difficult.

10

dlil

the American Psydhiatric Association)while both
followed different unitary systems. Several examples of

scheme recommended by

Hillside and

MMHC

conversions
with
Table
suggested
in
our
I,
diagnoses from.Menninger are listed
con—
These
two
institutions.
other
of
the
that
into categories comparable to

versions provide a source of distortion.

at the
detail.
The discharge rating at Menninger
and
format
varied
in
three hospitals
Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological
53)

e Rat'

Disc

s of

rovement:

Ratings of improvement

Hillside Hespital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center
had global ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each
factor of the Menninger system (Table II). For this study the Menninger syndrome
and syndrome Changes.

rating

3. jﬁﬂv

was compared

to the global ratings of the other institutions.

"A, .16 (’30

waft/mm

Co

I. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age, education

�and California F Scale score among the

three institutions is presented

in Table III.

a)

Social Class:

The

institutions

composition of the three

the population

anticipated difference in social class
was observed.

was predominantly upper

At Menninger Hospital

class; at Hillside Hospital, middle

Massachusetts
Mental Health Center, predominantly lower
class; and at

class.
There were no differences

b) ége;

in age distribution in the

institutional populations.
c) Education:

The

populations also differed in educational attain-

ment, with patients having more years of education

at

than at MassaChusetts Mental Health Center. While

Ml

patients at

per cent of the
had not completed high school, only 32 per cent at

MMHC

Hillside and

23

per cent at Menninger did not graduate.

d) F Score:

Califbrnia

F

patients had
50

or above

below 30.

Differences in the distribution of scores on the

Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent of Menninger
F
—-

of stereotypy.

patients had

Menninger Hospital

F

scores below 30, and only eight per cent with scores of

the higher

F

scores being associated with higher degrees

In contrast, at Hillside thirty—one per cent of the

scores below

30

while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were

�Thus, thl=a=pa===d.differences in social

attainment and performance on the
#40;

F

class, educational

Scale were observed.
RELA'H u a.

These

differences permit a test ofkhypotheses oamannrnngdﬂxrirﬁeﬁﬁxwrtn?
sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables among these

institutions.
12.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment: Amongﬁinstitutions, significantly

at Menninger Hospital (”3%) received somatic therapy
than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV).
fewer patients
b)

DUration of H05pitalization:

The

three institutions

differed with regard to patient’s length of stay (Table IV). Patients

at

Menninger Hospital were

hospitalized longest, with

65%

of patients

remaining for twelve months or more, compared to 31 per cent of the

Hillside patients and only

per cent at the MassaChusetts Mental Health
Center. The modal stay of the Hillside group was between seven and
eleven months while two-thirds of the MMHC patients were disdharged
5

within six months of hospitalization.
c)

Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most patients were

evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved" (Table IV). At
Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of
were

rated as "unimproved" and only a single patient

"recovered" or "much improved".

or

"much

The

was

patients
scored

highest percentage of "recovered"

inproved" ratings (28%) and the lowest proportion of

"unimproved" (10%) were found

d)

Diagnosis:

groupings were made:

at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.

For

statistical analysis three diagnostic

schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psycho-

neurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic propore

tions of patients within these groups were similar for Hillside and

MMHC,

�as slightly more than

half

were diagnosed as schizophrenia and one-

In contrast , at Menninger

quarter as psychoneurosis or affective disorder.

Hospital psychoneurosis and personality disorder accounted for more than

fifty per cent of the population.

6.

Intra—Hospital Comarisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of populations,
1......an
size
and
1::
the
sample
each
within
institution
homogeneity
their
dgghb
A
$31“ Lou-T
precluded adequate intra—hospital comparisons . everal groupings were
The

WW
Jr”)
W

obtained which had fewer than five cases)
.

.

.

.

94

z

5/

the trends appeared similar to those found

in the earlier study.

Age and F

score were found related to the selection

of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher
more

and
somatic
therapy),
receiving
frequently

F

P

score patients

score alone at Hillside.

both
the
related
at
and
were
chronological
of
age
hospitalization
length

Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for
the longest periods, While such relationships were significant in these
MMHC
V)
where no
(Table
noted
the
was
at
trend
similar
two hospitals, a

Menninger and

patients over

40 ,

but 1% of patients under the age of

than a year.
————_———_——

20

remained longer

�DISCUSSION

Q

,

M

daM
SOClal variables—95

1:11:
differences
in
Significant interinstitutional
of
distribution
in
not
but
age;
years of

education/W97

;

F

?

{”1238

MN

3

WI
}

kw

of
eva‘aaeed
periods
shorter
lower
class
patients
the institution serving
Eta
and
ﬁeportions
diagnoses
of
low
psychoneurotic
“better
,
hospitalization,
discharge evaluations. \
ment are

ﬁuw

$7,

memm‘

;

(M

I

and
complex
more
diagnoses
of
psychoneurotic
of stay, a higher proportion
a
forms
somatic
receiving
of
patients
diagnostic schemataalower proportion
“in
Similarly,
yere-eaeh-eonﬂmed.
ratings
and
discharge
of therapy,
poorest

r“

“3

{2/

MW
W
,

”ﬂ
033°”

“5:

f
Wtuw W

—variables
treatment
the
each
of
and
F
in
California Scale scores;
duration of hospitalization, selection ff treatments and distributions
“MM:
Maﬁa—5’
in—
e
of diagnoses and discharge evaluations.
..._v,.__~__~_.'/l\——".~W-v
J!
A
.
.
.
.
duration
the
longest
class
patients
stitution serVing upper
'

f""\

9’

«mean

related Ato

differences in staff attitudes

than—to—

“errences

in populations . 'Ihe contrasts between institutions in
duration of hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
and
of
evaluations
psychotherapy,
formulations , discharge
, definitions
lﬂese
differences
recorded
data.
amount
and
stylistic
of
details
the

W

wwﬁ‘sﬁssed as slinky idiosyncratic1am they follow a pattern
M,
W
related to social

{W
WW; meabmx/Wm
ﬁg “W434.
differences] consistent7with

.

�-10-

Such population and treatment

variable relationships are

Cf the physician
attitude
the
both
determined
by
interactive processes ,

and the administrative

staff

and by the
Such

constellation of

symptoms

or

relationships are marked most

history which patients present.
least
are
criteria
where
diaglostic
conditions
those
in
psychiatric
known
of
diseases
defining
criteria
where
objective
i.e.
specific,
,

ﬂ

personality
schizophrenia,
in
psychoneurosis/
etiology are absent, as
AAA-0L
of
conditions
perceptual a:
Under
these
disorders.
and behavior
and
expectations
attitudes
observer's
the
situational ambiguity)
Ak444~0u4,

become 5
I4

v

"uuﬁ situation was
Eris
his perception
classification)
6
.
. .
.
study
their
and
(1)
lefton
in
Dmitz
Pasamanick,
clearly emanated-by
observed
They
institution.
within
a single
of variations in diagnosis
in
did
differ
wards
not
type
different
to
assigned“
that patients

g4en¢bh ' o

dew

S ’and'

~qu

réaedéup

_

M

’1

Significant
residence.
education,
or
age
marital
status,
of admission,
diagnostﬁé
Cewif‘UI-Lﬂvarious
of
incidence
differences did occur, however, in the
among

the three wards and
m
'

believe theﬁ reflect the

among

differences

attitu

W

ward.
one
on
administrators
three

As

(“E

in the populations/ we

es 0 the examiners.

”atclinical evaluation

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis par”

another.
to
institution
have little
For
results
.
roduces
paradoxical
literal adherance to these concepts
meaning when

example, Menninger

transferred from

one

M
mhighly trained personnel
Hospital has—themes;

con—

3%

has
“fewest
the
for
longest
patients
its
keeps
time/and
ducting treatment,
the
poorest
Ad
reports
yI.’
yet,
as
diaglosed
schizophrenia,
patients

I

i
I

�-11-

treatment results.

,ﬁt'MMHC,

in contrast,

whiCh

is

most inclusive

in

defining a therapist, which keeps patients for the shortest periods,
and whéeh-has a higher-proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,

OV’

quality of carefnnop the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions)‘ Since the evaluations are
based on the institution's own ratings, we believe that the differences

reflect variations in the criteria used for evaluation of
rather than.§gy intrinsic psychiatric Characteristics.
In our

criteria of

initial Hillside

it was

postulated that different

utiliZed fer persons of different social
suggested that the higher the person's social

improvement were

It

baCkground.

study (‘)

improvement

was

the more complex the

cr1ter1a.enm3i?:§é*£lgis has‘::§&amp;;1
background
literally confirmed in the present study, WithAMenninger‘EluSIng a

to the global rating of the other two institu—
considering the syndrome rating on whidh our comparative

tripartite rating
tions.

Even

statistical

compared

analyses were based,

it is

our contention that fOr lower

class persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper class
persons the

criteria

emphasize sudh complex intangibles as "developing

insight", or "working through one's problems."

�-12_

demonstrated
the role of
While these investigations have again

social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed
by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These
selected for their educational leadership and the
expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly defined. But
differences in institutional style made it difficult to obtain comparable

institutions

were

data. This experience is a cue to the problems of the conventional use

of comparative statistics, especially in the evaluation of psychiatric

therapies.

The use

of disdharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or

length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the
identification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and

style as well as social class patterns in patient populations.

ﬁkrteﬁéeve———

difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories,
lack of confirmation may reflect differences in populations and
criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use

confirm

’Ehese

for the
psychiatric
of the

terns "schizophrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore changes in psydhological
and biological features of mental illness has led to-;:;1mnanadrthgr
6;Z;é
science burdened by negative results.
a valid observation to be

“40W
reported from one laboratory{ the methods armhamﬁaaﬁeélable—teéay to
Judy.”

«(no—c..-

(adeduately)describe psychiatric populations for an=adiqnuta==nnfinm==éan.
//*~—~.“www.m“imm.
“WM.,.,.--M—«~~WW"
c

M

4;,Aaanéigzgedai7

.

:

54; fggﬁ"JR;¢”;'
2%;7*"/;?

E

�~13.

fzar
Increased attention must be paid to thenaathedniogéoairprebiemSuei—-V4-’
3

w,
a
by "objective" criteria rather than the present
methods, so highly dependent on institutional and observer attitudes
and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

$nn“
g
cla881fyiag sub ects
‘

.

o

a

9

a

�-1u-

WW
SUMMARY

and

“Wu-I

2

@1

MW

VoLu u'!

three

CONCLUSION

MWHw.» m...»

(A

a.

teaching hospitals,
W,~.mm~__1_ ""“"Wm.m...“
mmwv— vm l.»/
ﬁopulation characteristicsjig-ererelated to treatment variables

W

,.. .

.,

wwmm

MN

defined by social class, age, education and F score ,
W
type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,

TfZM
(W
Washed-#0

W

diagnosis and discharge evaluation.

Z

interinstitutional

:da—
differences were observed in

patient social class , years of education and
California
F scores , but not age.
distribution of

@

variations in treatment characteristics among institutions were found—$0.435; significantly different in the predicted

‘2,

The

direction.

'%

6

“Q

variations in psychiatric practices follow a pattern
among’f‘institutions
withgocial
and are
consistent
class differences
These

not regarded as idiosyncratic.

6g

‘Eae

differences in institutional style

make comparisons

of

between
and
treatment
duration
results
of
diagnoses,
hospitalization,
institutions difficult and tenuous , and the need for more objective

criteria

4w 4C1

ff

classification

(

0

ne‘kﬁ‘m‘v)

emphasized.
is
pppulations
A

�REFERENCES

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik,

Authoritarian Personalitz.

The

990 pp.

3.

Communit238tudz.

J.

and Sanford, R. N.
Harper and Brothers, New York, 1950,
D.

Class and Montal Illness:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, T933, KHZ pp.

Hollingshead, A. B. and
A

E., Levinson,

delich, F. 0. Social

L., Pollack, H. and Fink, M. Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Montal Hospital. J. Hillside Hos ., 1957, Q; 216Kahn, R.

228.

h. Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Pink, M. Sociopsychologic Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Montal Hospital: Duration of Hospi-

talization,

;:

565-5714.

Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis. Arch. Gen Ps

hiat.,

1959,

S. Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, H. Social Attitude (California F
Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. Mont. Dis., 1960, 1;_: 187—192.

Pasananick, 3., Dinitz, s. and Lofton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and
its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital. Amer. J.
P

hiat.,

1959, gig: 127-132.

7. Siogel, N. H., Kuhn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, H. Social Class,
Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals. Social Problems,
1962, 19: 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

-WM_W_

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

InterhosEital

III

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Menninger

Hospital

I

Hillside
Hospital

1

Massachusetts
Mental Health

s

2

§

a

3

1
1

Social

Class

III

E

17

3b

‘

z

g

i

g

1

i

i

3

i

l

!

z
~,

Years of
Education

llZ—lS

;

%

i
a

3
I

F

Score

5h

'13

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
;Menninger [Hillside Massachusetts

{Hospital [Hospital Mental Health

of
Treatment

Type

'Psychotherapy
Somatic

68

Other

8

I

Duration of

7-11 months

Hospitali—

W

zation

months

WWW..-”—

mmm
-w
-

1

*-

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

10

.

i

Discharge
Diagnosis

.

,

I

mewmm

001
-.......’32_.L.__.......B&lt;
_....

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

(95)

(171)

I

(85

5h%

17

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

l»
mm

Below 20

Menninger

Hillsidg

81

he

73

36

61

30

3O

20

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks,

L.I.

New

York, 195941962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial
"
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The

‘

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

*9':

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In

their studies of the

psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded,
New

Haven

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to pay“ In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birthc These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings. In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratings,
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i.e,, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recovered.
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that dif—
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital, To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -— Hillside
Hospital, the C. Fo Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston» These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classesc
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapyo

istics

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,

score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions”
education and

F

�-2“
METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo—

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
statusc The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center»
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trends" These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in.the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

ﬂ...

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
tioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institu~
tions, however, the many differences between institutions are accentuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study, Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome;
When

*—

1. Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult,
At Menninger

criteria for

differed

among

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia—

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident“ Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicians, No additional fees were charged,
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
was designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psycho~
was necessary for members of the study team to interview
therapy

it

the resident responsible for each case.

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric

Association, while both Hillside and

followed different unitary
systemsa Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
MMHC

�Table I

3. Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of imr
provement at the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II). For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other

institutions.

Table

B.

Inter-hospital

II

Comparison

1. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

in.

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observed. At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduatec
c) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty-one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
cent with scores of 50 or above -— the higher F scores being assoc—
iated with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 300
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed, These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables
2a

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV).
a)

three institutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)Q
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
b) Duration of

Hospitalization:

The

group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
MMHC
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV)o At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved” and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"e The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved” ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved” (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV)w The diag—
nostic preportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per—cent of the
populationo

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital com—
parisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsideo
Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periods,
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year.
The

Table

V

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the
examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to anothere Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results,
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment resultso
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social backgroundo It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployed° This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems.”
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapiese The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables included type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions,
~Simi1arly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the institutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula—
tions is emphasized°
These

�REFERENCES

E., Levinson, D. J. and
Authoritarian Personality. Harper and

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik,

Sanford,

Brothers,

R. N. The
New

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

York, 1950, 990 pp.
A. B. and

Illness:

A

Redlich, F.

C.

Community Study°
New York, 1958, 442 pp.

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.

Kahn, R.

J. Hillside Hosp.,
.

1957, 6: 216-228.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
G
Ps
Diagnosis. A
a ., 1959, A; 565—574.
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

Social Attitude (CalScale) and Convulsive Therapy. ligjﬁuabhlkuug_jn§,,
M.

and Fink, M.

1960, 13Q5 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
1959, 116: 127—132.
Hospital.

Whig”

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality
Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comgarisons for Sociogsxchological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
I

Class

"I“

Hospital

7%

II

20

III

34

IV

34

V

5

x2 = 121.5; df=8:

I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

lllllﬂaiﬂllllllIlllﬂﬂﬂﬂﬂlllll

N

Social

Hillside

_

p:(.001

“M“-0__-____—_‘-.i-____.__..1-____—___
19%

20- 39

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4g p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
§Menninger
N

T

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

mum-.mHospital

Type of

Hillside

Psychotherapy

Hospital

36%

re atment Somatic
Other

=82 8 df=4
100

N

Duration
of

Hospital—

ization

7

months

7-11 months

.

~11 months

Recovered,

Much

.001
173

95

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

90. 6 df= 4

X2=

.

.001-

Improved

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

2903' df=4.

U&lt;n001

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

23.8' df=4° .&lt;.001

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L. I. New York, 1959— 1962.

Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C. F. Menninger Memorial
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The co.operation of Dr. Max

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY-2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
.Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excludeda

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hosPitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including in—
dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to pay, In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratingso In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingsm
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i;gf, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredu
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that differencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital» To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -- Hillside
Hospital, the C. F, Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Bostono These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classeso
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care. Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapya

istics

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,

score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutionsa
education and

F

�METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo-

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non-voluntary
status. The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center,
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutions, These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
tioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institutions, however, the many differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific dif—
ferences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome,
When

1, Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult.
At Menninger

criteria for

differed

among

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia—

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a fee, Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident, Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedu
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy

designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical studentso
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric

Association, while both Hillside and

followed different unitary
systemso Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
MMHC

�‘1

Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of imw
provement at the three hosPitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)o For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
39

institutions.

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
1. Sociopszchological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental

Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduate,
c) Education:

The

Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty-one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
the higher F scores being assoc—
cent with scores of 50 or above
iated with higher degrees of stereotypya In contrast, at Hillside
thirty-one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 30,
d) F Score:

——

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainﬁ
ment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These diff—

erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables among these institutionse
2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables

Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV)c
a)

three institutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)O
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center, The modal stay of the Hillside
b) Duration of

Hospitalization:

The

group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
MMHC
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation:

PA

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV). At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved", The highest
percentage of "recovered" or ”much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disorder, In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per-cent of the
populationo

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillside. Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periodso
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year.
The

Table

V

�-7DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter'institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment variables -- duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7)¢
The

,r‘

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmedo The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions”
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populations° The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data, While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 3223, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorders, Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution,
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residenceo Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications

among

the

three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical results, For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results,
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutions,
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background, It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployed, This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
In our

compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statis—
tical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."

While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�f’.

leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapies, The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological fea—
tures of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in"
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
»Similar1y, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods cf hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the
stitutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
These

in—

differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula—
tions is emphasizedo
Such

�REFERENCES

E., Levinson, D. J. and
Authoritarian Personality. Harper and

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik,

Sanford, R. N. The
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

.

A. B. and

Illness:

Redlich, F.

C.

John Wiley and Sons,

Community Study.
New York, 1958, 442 pp.
A

Social Class and

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216-228.

Kahn, R.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
HOSpital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
G
PS h
565—574.
15
Diagnosis.
1959,
.,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink,

M.

Social Attitude (Ca1-

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. .lLJkﬂubnlkﬂug_DLi-,

1960, 139; 187-192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Am£I4_Ja_2£¥£hiaL., 1959, 116: 127—132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, 195 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosRital Comparisons for Sociogsychological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
N

I

Social

Class

‘“

Hillside
Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IllllﬂliillllllllIIIIIIIHEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZIIIIIIIII
31%

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34

IV

1

34

V

0

5

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p&lt;(.001

“M

1IIIIiIiﬂiiIIinjﬂﬁniiiiiﬂiiiiﬂiijﬁiiiiiIIIIIIIMIBIIIIIIIII
19/

20- 39

=

Years of

Educatio

3. 9; df= 4; p=n. s.

&lt; 12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05

IIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEﬂIIIIIIII
F

Score

x2 =

33%

20%

50

38

17

42

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�W

TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
{Menninger

Hospital

N

Type of

Treatment

Psychotherapy
Somatic

Other

Duration
0t

Hillside
Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

21%

36%

24%

43

64

68

36

-—

8

7-11 months

Hospitallzatlon ~ll months

Recovered,

Much

Improved

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
nimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

2903. df=4.'&lt;0001

52%

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

22

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

26
X

=

23.8. df=4. .&lt;0001

54%

17

29

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Ass

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

40-49

30

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�Herch 12. 1965
Dr. Hetheniel Siegel. Ph.n.

lecionel Institute of Hentel Beelth
Bethesde. Ketylend

Deer nets:

I have sooepted ell your recommendations end heve redone this report.
Enclosed ere e for copies which, while they still may hsve e typographiosl error, ere in e for: which ooold he sent to s publisher. I have
taken the liberty of running this off on Colitho pletos. so the: if it
is not published, we may still have some copies for our friends.
Unless I hes: from you or receive s stop order. I will send e copy
of this to the Archives of Geoersl Psychiatry.
My best regards.
Sincerely yours.
Me: Pink. H.D.

H131-

Professor of Psychiecry

�Hutch 12. 1965

Dr. Robsrt L. Kuhn, Ph.D.

Division of Psychiatry
antstiora Hospital and Medical Cents:

Ill

Esau 210th 8tssst
Riv York, ﬂaw York 10667

Dear Bdb:

Following all tha recommendations in our last discussion, I have
accepted the full responsibility for this draft. Recognizing the snotionsl problems involvsd. I hsvn deleted
nsas. In this drsft. I
have sssuusd tbs senior authorship insofar as you seen to be ralactsnt
to do anything with the doeumsnt. It you would lihs, I will has. the
first psgs radon. sad hsvs this subnictsd to tbs Archivss of Gsuarsl
Psychiscry. with you ss senior author.

st's

It I

tsctory.
My

do not has: from you.
and submit
ss
is

it

it

I will assume that this drstc is satisto Dr. Grinksr.

best rsgsrds.
Sincerely yours,

Iink, H.D.
frofsssor of Psychistry

Ms:

31:3:

�MONTEFIORE'HOSPPTAL.AND MEDICAL UHETHR
111

EAST 210TH STREET. BRONX. NEW YORK 10467. TELEPHONE: 212/TU 1-1000

March 15, 1965

Fink, M.D.
Professor of Psychiatry
Department of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
University of Missouri
5h00 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri

Max

Dear Max:
Thank you for sending me the draft of the "Three Hospitals" paper.
I can understand your deleting Max's name since he never seemed able
accept this organization of the material. I would appreciate
however, if my name were restored as senior author when the paper
is submitted for publication. I do not, in fact, feel "reluctant"

it,

to handle it, and if you wish, I am quite prepared to arrange for
publication. I have no objections, however, if you wish to submit
it to Dr. Grinker first with myself as the senior author.

I notice

from your

letterhead that you are

now

a professor at the

university of Missouri. I hope this change will be beneficial to
your professional interests. You certainly have my best wishes.
Regards

to Martha.
Sincerely,

34;,

Hebert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Head, Section of Psychology
Division of Psychiatry
RLK:DCS

to

�April 1,

1965

Robert L. Kain, Ph. D.

Division of Paydmiatzy
Hmtefiom Hospital and Hndical Cantor
111 East 210th Strut
Bronx,

Haw

York

10%?

DurBob:

Mummftisenclmod.andithasgmctonn

Wrinthisfom
Idohopohaceeptait,becauseit
is me of tho
intcmsting nm-bioloﬁeal studies in

m
participated.
MWMWMW.mImﬁndmlf
inapooitimsimilartomatmichlheldinmsa.

whidx we have

Waterman burdms

The

are minimal and palate exclusively to

mymstudiu. Immhawadaiewdawdmofindepondmca
fwmamhwithamatdulofauﬂmvityoverpatimtn.
staff.md£acilitius. WMIcm-mhemﬂxingofthis
Ihaveafew excellent oomrkcm,but
mlytimwill
tell.
have

none

the stimulation and imginatim that you exhibited.

Max
14?: fun

Fink,

PLD.

Professor of Pug/wintry

�DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION. AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
BETHESDA. MD. 20014
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
AREA
aoI
TEL: ass—mo

coo:

March 17

2

1965

In reply refer to:

M-TMR-SS
AIRMAIL

Dr. Max Fink
Professor of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry

‘

University of Missouri
5400 Arsenal

Street

St. Louis, Missouri 63139

Dear Max:

for the colitho copies of the "Sociopsychological"
It looks fine and I hope that it will be accepted by

Thank you

paper.
the Archives of General Psychiatry.

I have been in touch with some of our training grantees in
Missouri, making the Missouri Institute of Psychiatry more
visible to them as a research source. I hope that some
cooperative endeavor may result in the not too distant future.

Please keep in touch, and give

my

best regards to Martha.

Sincerely,
Nathaniel H. Siegel, Ph. D.
Acting Chief, Social Sciences Section
Training and Manpower Resources Branch
National Institute of Mental Health

�April 1.

1985

Mamie). a. 31.91, PM).

Acting Chief, Social 801m Sectian
Training and Hammer Ramon Bunch
National Institute of bats). Health
Dapu'mmt of Health, Edtmtim. md Welfm
Bethesda, Maryland

Dar Nat:
After- scnﬁng copies of the aociopsychological paper to
Bob, he indicated apnfomce forbeing the scalar auﬂm.

Implmodtocxooodtohiswish,mdmcloeediaaoopy
ofﬁte “pm wiﬂatmmvisod fact sheets. Ampysimmrto

this has

gone

to the Amhim.

811ml}; yaks,
Max

HP-zjn

Pink,

1-1.1).

Manor of. Psychiatry

�March 30. 1965

lobbins,
stis
Msdicsi Dirscror
Hillside Hospital
Dr.

P. O.

Box 38

Glsn Oaks,

Haw

K. D.

York

Dost Lev:
During ths

wists: usstings

discussed this study and

esrion.

we

Bob Xshn,

I
for publi-

Nst Sisgcl and

ssrssd to prepsrs

it

linsl drsft is enclosed for

your infornstian. Vs hsvs
tsksn rhs liberty of sabnirring this to Dr. Grinksr for his
A

consideration for publication in tbs
copy

I!

to

Agghgve .

it

sdvissbls. I would be plesssd to ssnd
you dssl
snyons you sugzsst st tbs Heaninxsr Foundation.
Sincsrsly yours.

link, H. D.
Protsssor of Psychiatry

Ms:

ﬁrst,

s

�Hatch 30. 1965

Dr. Jack Ewslt, H. D.
Prefessor of Psychistry
Massachusetts Hunts! Esslth Cantor
72~76 Yenwood Rosd

Boston, Hassschnsstts
Dear Dr. Ewslt:

s conpsrsttve study was undertsksn with
the Massachusetts Mental Baslth Conner as s coopsrstins institution. A finsl copy of tbs ropes: of thst study is sneloscd.
we have tsceLvsd psruisston to publish this inforustion from
Sons years ago,

Dr. Grssnblstt.

WW-

I an writing to tell

for consideration

I

would bu

by tho

you

tbs: us hsvs submittsd this drst:

plssssd to hsvs your con-sacs.

Sinesrsly yours.

Ms:

rink, u.

D.

Profsssor of Psychiatry

lltkp

�March 30, 1965

as. Roy R. Grinkar, Sr.
lbpartnent of Psychiatry
Michael Reese Hospital
micago, Illinois 60616
Dear Dr. Grizﬂcer:

I

the opportmity to enclose two copies of a
report "Socioysychological Aspects of Psychiatric Tmatmnt
in Emma Voluntary Hospitals" for your consideration for
publicatim in the Archives.
am tall-dug

We report mmmts a study mdertaken some years
ago by my associates and myself at the Hillside Hospital.
We have decided to submit 'ti'xis for
publicatim, in View of
the continued interest in the social aspects of diamonis
and manhunt.

Sincerely yours,
Max Pixﬂc, M. I).

Professor of Psychiatry

3‘?

�Harvard Medical School
Department of Psychiatry

Boston
Fenwood
Road,
021 I 5
74

l
l

l

Massachusetts Mental Health Center

[plllllllllllllllllll3M“; ljlllllllllll!!llﬂlH

.
ugﬁﬁrﬂiﬁ
a:

g

2:”

l

(Boston Psychopathic Hospital)

ill

Department of Mental Health

W”

”H"

u:
‘

Flak-.215

.-:::.!'1|

"

x2.mumuillméw

JACK

R. EWALT, M.D.

3mm PROFESSOR or PSYCHIATRY
SUPERINTENDENT

April

5, 1965.

Dr. Max Fink

Professor of Psychiatry
Mi ssouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:
Thank you for the copy of your study of the Hillside
Menninger's MMHC. I found it very interesting and, considering the
differences particularly between this place and Menninger's, I am impressed with the way you could tease out comparable elements. I would
hope some energetic person would about ten years after the first study
do a repeat on the same three institutions, using as near as possible the
same criteria to see what directions or shifts if any had taken place
be
would
directional changes
that
there
I
them.
strongly
suspect
among
in all three but the differences you found would probably persist.
Si

ely

�w. -.

m.

.V

1n: vv “

quI’V—nw

W", waw w':——'-1.17W . VF... s ”pamn— w...“ -mrmwmwv 4w-uw1-w‘rr ,_....v , .
—

Jun. 3,

up. lbbart

1..

New

. .4,

,

.«.—-~w "w ‘v.'rr .. «q many

1965

Rain

Division of Psychiatry
Hawaiian Win). and
1.11 East 210th 3m“:

M York,

”ﬁn—“W.

hated.

Cantor

York 16%?

DaanublndNat:

Hm:

Firm,

1!. 1).

Professor of Paydﬁatry

many
an:

HAW Sign. Hm}.
Mimi Imam of m1 Knuth

m,

mm

a“

m:«mv-:~,&lt;muvw; vn‘w‘u‘w‘rv

v

V

..

,...

�PROCESSING OF

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
Each accepted manuscript is processed
in the Chicago Editorial Offices of the
Archives of General Psychiatry bringing
together all elements of the printed pages
of the final published article.
You will receive a reproduction of the

typescript, edited according to the official
AMA Style Book, for final review and approval. There will be no galley proof.

is accepted with the
understanding that it may be necessary to
make minor revisions, or to request changes
in illustration or text.
Your manuscript

The Editors

�SAMPLE

DETACH

SAMPLE

AUTHOR(S) (AND ONE ADDRESS): R. K. Merchant and .I. P. Utz

1200 Blank Street, Chicago, Illinois 60610

TITLE: Familial Sarcoidosis
(Name of) JOURNAL: Archives of Internal Medicine

Sarcoidosis was observed in a mother and her daughter. The criteria for this diagnosis
included (1) a compatible clinical picture, (2) granulomatous inflammation with little
or no necrosis and the absence of demonstrable microorganisms to specially stained
sections of biopsy material, (3) negative cultures, particularly'for acid-fast bacteria
and fungi, of appropriate body fluids, exudates, and surgically excised granulomatous
tissue, and (4) apositive Kveim test. These cases of sarcoidosis, together with 73
others involving more than one member of each 32 families, suggest the possibility
that a complex hereditary trait is operative in the pathogenesis of Sarcoidosis.

�w

DETACH

.

INVITATION...TO PREPARE AN ABSTRACT OF YOUR COMMUNICATION WHICH
WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR PUBLICATION .IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN
MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

Suggestions:

.7.

1. Type name(s) of author(s) (also address of one of the authors),

title of article

and name of journal in which the original article appears.
2. Type

abstract on attached card and mail promptly:

a) Indicate purpose, extent, kind of study, materials and methods used.

chiefly to new data—the high points—informational, not descriptive;
criteria,
technics,
diagnostic
new
new
new
new
statistics,
apparatus,
e.g.,
new evidence, new preventive measures, a new theory,new treatment.Do
not use abbreviations.

b) Refer

3. The

abstract should not exceed 200 words.

NOTE: Accepted abstracts will be printed concurrently with publication} of the original

article.

PLEASE TYPE

THIS IS THE ONLY REQUEST

PLEASE RUSH

�DETACH
PREPARE AN ABSTRACT OF YOUR COMMUNICATION WHICH
I LL BE CONSIDERED FOR
IiIVITATION...TO
PUBLICATION IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN
EDICAL ASSOCIATION.

Suggestions:
1. Type name(s) of author(s) (also address of one of the authors),

title of article

and name of journal in which the original article appears.
2. Type

abstract on attached card and mail promptly:

a) Indicate purpose, extent, kind of study, materials and methods used.
b) Refer

chiefly to new data—the high points—informational, not descriptive;
e.g., new statistics,new apparatus, new technics, new diagnostic criteria,
new evidence, new preventive measures, a new theory,new treatment.Do
not use abbreviations.

3. The

abstract should not exceed 200 words.

NOTE: Accepted

article.

PLEASE TYPE

abstracts will be printed concurrently with publication} of the original
THIS IS THE ONLY REQUEST

PLEASE RUSH

�SAMPLE

DETACH

SAMPLE

——————————-———————‘_

AUTHOR(S) (AND ONE ADDRESS): R. K. Merchant and J. P. Utz
1200 Blank Street, Chicago, Illinois 60610

V.

TITLE: Familial Sarcoidosis
(Name of) JOURNAL: Archives of Internal Medicine

Sarcoidosis was observed in a mother and her daughter. The criteria for this diagnosis
included (1) a compatible clinical picture, (2) granulomatous inflammation with little
or no necrosis and the absence of demonstrable microorganisms to specially stained
sections of biopsy material, (3) negative cultures, particularly'for acid-fast bacteria
and fungi, of appropriate body ﬂuids, exudates, and surgically excised granulomatous
tissue, and (4) apositive Kveim test. These cases of sarcoidosis, together with 73
others involving more than one member of each 32 families, suggest the possibility
that a complex hereditary trait is operative in the pathogenesis of Sarcoidosis.

�*Kahn, R.L., Fink,
,

dd
d
THOR
s
*‘blijvisioé 3f(?3yc?1'i%€ryf°ﬁgntefiore
“

M.

and Siegel, N.

10467)
Hospital,
St.,
TFFLE:Sociopsychological Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three
JOIHHWAL: Archives of General Psychiatry
Voluntary HOSpitals.
Population characteristics, defined 5y social class, age, education
and F score, were related to treatment variables in three voluntary
teaching hospitals, Hillside Hospital (N.Y.), C.F. Menninger Memorial
111 E 210

NY

Hospital (Topeka), and Massachusetts Mental Health Center (Boston).
Treatment variables included type of treatment, duration of hospitalizaThe
and
evaluation.
institutions differed in
discharge
diagnosis
tion,
of education and distribution of California
class,
years
patient social
1
but not age.
EF scores,
had
the
The
class
longest
g
patients
serving
institution
upper
p
psychoneurotic diagnoses &gt;
quration of stay, a higher proportion of lower
of
patientg
Idand
a
schemata,
complex
proportion
more
diagnostic
(I)
the
dischar
e
of
fo
oorest
an
somatic
ther
rati
receivi
Eamong tﬁé three instfgﬁtions. €¥§i1ariy, thg institution sgrving “gs
m
of
had
the
shorter
hospitalization,
periods
class
patients
glower
m
lower proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better
discharge evaluations.
Psychiatric treatment and management practices differ among
institutions according to the prevailing social class characteristics
of their populations.

�F‘
.

“‘
““
&lt;4,

FIRST CLASS

Permit No.

1876

CHICAGO 10, ILL.

VIA AIRMAIL

MAIL
REPLY
BUSINESS
No Postage Necessary if Mailed in the U.S.
Postage

.

W111

be paid by—
.

American Medical Association
535 North Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60610, U.S.A.
Z. Danilevicius, MD

_

—
'—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

_

~

�ARCHIVES OF
GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
EDITORIAL BOARD
ROY R. GRINKER SR., M.D., Chief Editor

American M€dical ASSOCiation
June

Institute for Psychosomatic

andPsychiatticReseatch

29th Street and Ellis Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60616
EATON W. BENNETT, M.D., San Antonio
EUGENE L. BLIss, M.D., Salt Lake City
GEORGE E. GARDNER, M.D., Boston
EDWARD O. HARPER, M.D., Cleveland
M. RALPH KAUFMAN, M.D., New York
HAROLD I. LIEF, M.D., New Orleans
FREDERICK C. REDLICH, M.D., New Haven, Conn.
MORTON F. REISER, M.D., New York
DAVID MCK. RIOCH, M.D., Washington, D.C.
JURGEN RUESCH, M.D., San Francisco

3 , 1965

Fink, M.D.
University Of Missouri

Max

Medicine
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri

JOHN H. TALBOTT, M.D., Director
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

SChOOl Of

GILBERT S. COOPER, Managing Editor
T. F. RICH, Assistant Managing Editor

63139

'

re: Manuscript

Number 3836

Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three
Voluntary Hospitals by KAHN, Fink,
and Siegel
Dear Doctor Fink:

I am very pleased to inform you that your paper has been
accopted by the Editorial Board for publication in the ARCHIVES
OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRE,

Yours very
ROY

truly,

R. GRINKER, 311., NJ).

Chief Editor
iknczbr

�’

ARCHIVES OF
GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
EDITORIAL BOARD
ROY R. GRINKER SR., M.D., Chief Editor

American Medical ASSOCiation

Institute to: Psychosomatic

andPsychiatticReseatch

29th Street and Ellis Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60616
EUGENE L. BLISS, M.D., Salt Lake City
GEORGE E. GARDNER, M.D., Boston
EDWARD O. HARPER, M.D., Cleveland
M. RALPH KAUFMAN, M.D., New York
HAROLD 1. LEE, M.D., New Orleans
FREDERICK C. REDLICH, M.D., New Haven, Conn.
MORTON F. REISER, M.D., New York
DAVID MCK. RIOCH, M.D., Washington, D.C.
JURGEN RUESCH, M.D., San Francisco

June 149 1965

Max

Fink,

M.D .

JOHN H. TALBOTT, M.D., Director
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

Department Of PSYChiatry

Executive Managing Editor
GILBERT S. COOPER, Managing Editor
T. F. RICH, Asszstant Managmg Edttor

ROBERT W. MAYO,

Missouri Institute Of Psychiatry
University Of Mi ssouri
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

re: Manuscript

SOciopsychological Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatment in Three
Voluntary Hospitals by KAHN, Fink,
and Siegel

Dear Doctor Fink:

I

Number 3326

very pleased to inform you that your paper has been
accepted by the Editorial Board for publication in the ARCHIVES
am

OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY.

Yours very
ROY

truly,

R. GRINKER,SR., M.D.

Chief Editor
RRG3br

P.S.

We

will,

Of

spaced throughout.

Course, need three cepies of the manscript, doubled

�re: Manuscript Number 3836

Sociopsychological Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in
Three Voluntary Hospitals by
KAHN,

Dear Author:

et

a1

Your paper has been received and is being considered by the
Editorial Board. A decision will be given to you as soon as possible.
Yours very truly,
ROY R. GRINKER, Sr.,

MD.

Chief Editor
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

�IS

ROYR. GRINKER, Sr., M

5

c)

Pan

‘

_HIS

29th STREET AND ELLIS AVENU CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, 60616

SIDE OF CARD

FOR ADDRESS

Fink, M.D.
University of Missouri
Dept. of Psychiatry at
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

Max

�June 15, 1965

Dr. Roy R. Grinkcr, Sr. , Chief Editor-

Archivna of General Psychiatry
Institute for Paymomtic and Psychiatric Paaeamh
29th Strut and Ellis Avenue
Chicago. Illinois 60616
Dnar Dr. Grinkcr:

Enclosed am thme copies of thc

mmcxipt entitled

"Sociopsycl'nlogical Mpocts of Psychiatric '15:!th in
That. Voluntary Mitch," as mmtcd in ymr recent
letter. I am also enclosing the Mical abstract card.
I have pmvimuly
cm to Dr. Dmilevicim, as he had
rcqunstcd this about ten days ago.

mt

man: you very

much

for your interest.
Sincamly yours,
Pink, H.D.
Professor of Psychiatry

Max

Hrzkp

encloms

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�w.

.-..w‘ww.."“mmmmn—pw

MWCALWSOP

WCWWWWWW
mm

L

m.

31.9... ”I! My

Katmai.“ Sing-1.

Rub)“

“ODD...

�Wt
Oaks,

Thisutudyunduuwmmnutmmassocimdatthe
Hillside Hospital. Glen
of
L.I.

Expodmul Pawmutry,

New

Yak. 1959452.

MWmdﬂuataﬂsofﬂn
meimofIr.
CJ‘.
«ad
1:):
Manta).
Henningnr
Cantor
hath
Mutant“
mm
l-bmitnl in gratefully

W.

Aidcd, in part. by grams M24092 and HY~2715. of the National
Hulth, 0.8. Public malt}: Serving; and tho
Instituu of
mun Bond.
Rum County

mm

m1

O

Pun-mt Adams”

East 210th
York 1mm.

“

I’m-mt Adan":

W
SM.

mvidm of Psychiatry, Hmmfim
111
0mm, New
Howitd and

Wt
ram

New York.

of Psychiatry at the
Instituu o: Psyehhuy,
Missouri
School
of
of
Mmity

sum m1 Strut.
Win...
8t. Inuit, Missouri 63139.

no

HIP 2/1/65

Present Adda-u;

Nutimal Institutc of brutal Knuth,

Wadi. mma.

�.

V.—

,___‘V

... auvn-m. rm. .whwwvr... _w..

.vaw.‘w 3w.-- - .-.—u--r.. .'&gt;rlm' 'v' r q— “n... v-A‘Hnwwvwv‘V-vvv' )w-p—w' vrwumwrl—‘"W':"'V"V""-*‘VL'I'W-lw-v ‘.'._.,.._wv

mmmdﬂuﬂummmcmmpop-

ulntim.

8011111351356 and

hdlich

Imported significant

relation-

Mphmnmhmm'spmldminmsodalchssnmmtm
mmmddmceofmatndillmas,typesof¢iagmoddism

mmmmotmudammtmmmm.
mainflumceoftmmcstmofﬁumientmthe
availabilityofmating pummel.

m,mmtmm¢

Stmiasofﬁnmbofaodalfwminthomxmnof
of their fixmial status and tho
hospitalized paints

Wt
m

mast-tam at Huma- Hospital in
availability of mutant:
1957. In this hospital, anxiety of manhunt modes, incluling
individual payabaﬁnmpy,
were

WW

thompiu
available to all patients regardless of melt” ability to pay.
and convulsive

hmamys (mummizhat patimts hospitdiudforﬂn

Wm‘iodsmmoldar.hadlmedtmimmdmmoftm

011mm. Mom,mmwmimmpm
inmtlymmdbyomvulsiwﬁnmpymdmoeiwdmfavumbh

WWW.
mum
W
Myhypaydaathu‘pyujdmiwdpoomdim

mm

mm.mr.miv¢m.

mhoopitlliud for Impurioda, tmtad
ratings.

Thuclmimlfwmwnmmmamof‘sumtypy,
mmmnmrSa-hu.s).mwrm.w Mrstomn

mmmofmmmdinmlmtadimduinvolutiaalpmis
WWWMMWDMN thrupyﬂtocpitaliud‘fom amt-

m,mmmmmumwwm.

�_-..‘._ i

It as

,.

m." ....

7.." ‘r».:-

—

-~~--

um»

7.“ ,

suggested that differences in paydxiatr-io treatnmxt

afloat a similar influence of social factors

along hospitals should

as noted for patimts within Hillside Hospital. To

ewtion it was

decided to

wloy the

Hillside study in three institutions

cm. lhmin'ger
Mental Health

mm

enter in

-

test this

procedures of the 195?

Hilleide Hospital, the
Hospital in Topeka and the Maoeadmoetta
Boston.

Those

with the expectation that diverse

available to population of

institutions

were selected

tnataent modalities

diffemt social classes.

were equally
Each provided

ohm—ten treatment of voluntary patients and did not provide
custodial care. Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory

staff

and active

march mite,

mixing

peydnomalytioallycoriented psychotherapy.
'Ihia study wm designed to detemine thepopulatim character-

ietioe of the three inetitutim with respect to social class. age,
echoatim and 1' some; lid to relate these dmmcteriatios to
treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diamoeia and discharge evaluation

mg

the inetitutiom.

tvwrw— w

v

�w

J"-

-A.».—.

v

...v. m-uwwa. ... ,ur» In.‘,._(...._,..n .,.‘,.“___,‘

.-

warm—Mr...“

.

.VN....

.v-

, ‘ ,7...” .... ....

NM”, x..." ‘rwm'.tq'(1.'rm'“&gt;1ﬂr-r.ny\w ”rm—"w.“ﬁvn v..._

mu
Ammofmwlmtuy.am1tpaﬁmtsinmimin

mum
adminidnﬂonpitalslndvolmtuypaﬁmsmly,amnnmr

WWquuminmeylaso.

ofthoocatﬂuWMthﬁmethﬂﬂQmm

mimdbyﬁnmtsprsymcovalmﬁmormm
dadmionwimmicnmmitummfmdfwn
specifiampmjwt. Mmﬂmﬂmmmfmﬂu
studybocmofthcirmwmuy

3m.

mmimeIMwasmndformImtimtmm
mundu.‘

memmofdismdmimﬁ

mummmmmmmwmmcrma
1110M.

PornmofsoddclumﬂnﬂoWZ-fwtw

im-aWMsdemmmmim-mmd
of
Hillside,
at
patients
(3.“,7).
mist-d
M
MORWWDSKWWWWMmCmtw.
mmmmmﬂmofﬁnnmofﬂusml
The

W

173

mmmdmcmiabluwiﬂdnmmnimﬂmumnm
batman institutions. mu. maxim mm difficult. lunar,

MmeofvuMBquiffWWbem.

W
www.mmwymoepaymcvamm
diffimltiu were

most mined

These

in the intm-hospital

will be placid on the diffomw batman imtitutiau with citatim
difficulties also no to
o: mwmmmm

m
m.
mummfomdmfwm‘dau,mfhmdintbeubmbythé
'

vmpawmimsaploaigs.

‘

pvt—u u

�A.

WMCAL mums

M Rpm

ofthehoapitalis

r

studies from an. instituticn, tho

stmctm

fwmtedmdeimrimdorm~

tel-am

timed bﬂaﬂy. In suturing amenable data from nultiplc
institutimo, hmwr, the durum between institutions are
«mutated. R111- thele institutims were sol-cred as mental:

invading,

mom

and

Mt m.

unlﬂm in ways which inflummd the data

they

a! the

m

8m.

fmctimdly
Specific

Mt,
mutant «Item.

differences were manhunt in the deeimtim of type of

(lunatic mutants.

and

th- evaluation of

m
Raw
designating that a pationt miwd
of

1.

the

institutim,

making

01'

Mutant:

The

”1:”de

cum-rim difficult.

oxitcria for
diffemd mg

hazing-r Hospital psychoﬂmpy was duimatod as mutant
basis by a staff psychiatrist for
Want-d on a
At

Mum

mmpaﬁmtwudmmdafui Wwithapsyddmic
ruidunt physicim wen midst“ part a! rmtino mutmiw
paint an.

arm a

Hillsid- ibopitn payMampy was
mutant
main»! with a psychiatric mid-at. Staff poydmictrim did not
A1:

matplthnta,

mmmactivitiutowpoming

midmtphysicim.

Nomitimdfmwemmd.

W
mm
MW 3
At

tht

th- mtivity

Hum: Gutter pnyehothcrupy was

ofmy disciplines

--~-

We

�“am

&lt;

-v

u w“ -w “KN..." .... ,.. v... -.

.7

r,r.,,..-....r...m~

rm.“

\w‘wur-m

7.. ,

.mvmwvrwmw—w ”v, w... H r.

v.

-_.'wm.-_..r.,.“,...m_,,‘,,.._w_..,. ,,._r_~‘l.,,_.
w

mm,pydnlosisu.sochlm,nms
wwwwdzmsimmnmtmﬂmlyimmainm

mdmdioal students.

mt'smmmmmmummmm

Witmmmfwmofﬂuammminm
unmidmtplmidmmpmnibh farewells...

W:
Wm:
2.

and.

Indivichal imtitutimal

difficult.

At

diamtic styles

cums
WWtal

Whmlﬂphuvmmiwsmmdbytmmdw
and
music:we row
mum
diffmtuﬁmaym. Scwnlmwofdimm

W.
W

Wmmudinhbul,wmhmmsumutodmmm

thWmMﬂﬁWmhﬂmﬁm.

Mmmmamﬂmm.
3-

m
WW=WMW

mummmitmmwinrmmmm. m
WWatWpritnmtdpar-dtewitham
«31min: Max:111,

W011

and

syndm

W.

mmmimmmmmmmmmmam
difficult to assess the ammunim of cad:
it

tutor
ofﬁnlhminearsymﬂ'nblan). Pwﬁﬁss‘mdyﬂnmmw
rating

making

smmmmmmmmotwm
intimation.

m
A...

7w..

�,

.,__n..-. 7‘..-‘._._.‘._..-..W‘..v...‘ w...—,.,-v.,mx-,~_..V“-.."w.u

"Wm.”w r9.w‘_v

. .r,_..-——w.w

”w. ._»,.,.r,,

—

._.__ .m‘...-..v..‘~,.\"

»......—-....—-v—

"m..- w

w ——.~..

".V...», v...“ -

mmmmumoruummamum,m.m

mmmrmmmmmmuumm
in
III.

W

Table

I)

W
mattinmﬁaipuaddﬂfnmin
mm"

mommmmormmmmmw.

”Wm-pimﬁupwﬂaﬂmmpmuywm;

«mumm.mm;mnmmmmm

www.muymam.
b)

msnmmmdifminmdimibutim

ammumwmmm.

Wammmaﬂu‘dhm
_mmm.mmmummmamdm
«WWmmummmmnmmmm.
mulmmammummmmmw
3M.uuya2parmtdtmmidcmd23permtatﬂlmimr
c)

didmtm.

d)

Wswfminmdlstﬁbutimat

mmﬁnmifthSed-mmmd.

Fifty-em

mmtdmmmrmhlwm.mmy

oimtmmwimmofSOwabw-wmhlmfm
hum

InWt.

�,

”.7

.

v

Nv‘,—'

~

v

,

v... v.

‘v"

—.~,~.~..-m ”11"!“ “we

,-.. ~.&lt;..,

.._ ~--r“~..,—a,&lt;.»~mprv-.

—.

~~pw~mmmw-w~mn

m.” a...

j."

-r..-‘...,.1~.v»

nymI-rznu

at Hillside thirty-me per cent of the patients had 1" scores
30 while at WHO only twenty per mt mm belcw 30.
mus, differences in social

perfume: an the

below

clan, edumtional attaimxt

P Scale were observed.

and

These diffexemee permit

test of the hypotheses relating sociopsydsological factors to the
mam-at variables mg these institution.
2. gleam-1c Than-ant Variables
a

n) Selectim of

rm

uimifimtly

W:

Manna

the institutions,

patimts at Naming” Hmpitel 043*.) received
sciatic therapy than at Hillside (6%) or 11116 (68$) (Table IV).
1:)
V

Wm

at Hoegiteliznticn:

‘lhe

three insti—

tutims differed with mm: to patient's length of my (m1. IV).
Pedant: it Hlminw Mini was hospitalized lamest, with
65‘ cf patients mining far twelve month: or
mated to

m.

alparwrtofﬂnﬂillnidepatientsMmlySpercmtatthe

Pin-mm

Hentnl thalth Center. 'Ihe mdal stay of the Hillside

mmbetweeneemmdelmmﬁu while tm-thirds ofthe

WC patients were
a)

W
Evalutim:

diam
Diem

within six

In and!

petients were evaluated at the time of
(Table IV) . At
(191!)

thinger Hoapitel.

of patients wen rated

patimt

was

a

of hoapitelizatim.

mini, mot

dimmer-3e no

"iuprmd"

however, a higher percentage

“miwmved” and only a single

scared ”uncured" or “max iwmved." The

percentage of ”mounted" an "mm harmed" rating

him

(2810 and

the

�_

_

v.

“v

~_.v_..‘._.......p.r

"anv “:wu—"mw-nr

-17.": WNWV. ”.wuwwn mm My .-.._‘ n-wwn-y—wy ..~—r

7—

—-,__.y vwri'ai.W"YV-wwmrnw.

Mmportimofwumwd”(mt)wmfamdnmmuo

mwmmm.
W3
minimum:

W,

d)

nostic

For

satiation analysis
uffccdw

Mmmiamdpomuuntymnﬂabh

than:

diag—

diam,

IV). Trading-

Mamdmmmmmmm
mmmm.usum1ymmmenaiW
"Wmmrwmmhwdfwdw
centrist. at
paydmmia
WW1“).

disorder. In

and

memmdfwmﬂmﬁftypwmdm
W161.
c.

’

m

W.»
mmammmmmmmmmmf
”Alum

W.ﬁnﬂrhmpmiﬂwiﬂdnudaimﬁtuﬂm.mdm

mm m].- siu

(neural

mine

Maud:

had
was
(«or than than was) maimed significant intru-l’mpital mn-

pm.

Humor-.mmappomummtommmm

thou-lineman

MMmeMnWmm

ulwddefatWHo-piulwwwhiMF
accumumfmmuymaimwmm‘py).md
Pamalematlﬂlhide.

mamimmmm~

Wmmmnmnmmmmmmm
Wm~mwmmmfmetm.
mmmmmummtmmmmmm,

�asmmmndwamudummmbuwmmmmn

mummusotpmmmummmonomm
Mam.

W

m
DISCUSSIW

mmormmmymmnmcmm

mind significant inter-institutional cum in social
mwmofmum.mtmtm;indiatﬂbutimof

ammrsmammmmmormmmm

win~mmothosp1unudm.ahctimo£mmts

mammarmmamwmum
maul-mm“.
Hmpitnlatudy
WWmmmmr
(7).

marina-d. 'nuimtitutimmvingwmpatiom

mmmmmwmyummw
paydmdodimmdmmdiwﬂcm,a

�-rw .-,.

a...

h

-...

w

‘

purvm .. “.V

7—-..

w. tux—0.... V" - ,7". "7‘-.. -

"\‘w' . -. -h. -Vw—l m.—....‘——wn~.
V

.

m

.w._-—zu—«——~....'_~Wm,-

u...“

-10..

form
of
therapy.
mtic
mim
and the poorest discharge ratings mg the three institutims.
smmxy. the 1:31:in serving mg. class patients did have

Mr

proportion of patients

the shorter

pew

of

hoe:pi.t:eliaa1:i.tm,~

peydmmtic diamond, ad

lover proportions bf

the better discharge evaluations.

Itumiwmeimﬂmtmdﬂfeminpeydumc

W

durum

in staff ettitudes and
are related more to
lock]. alas variables than peydniatric differences in populetiom.

The

are

We
greet.

as

between

m the

mututime in dwetim 0f hapitaliutim
mucky of climatic foundations.

diam-rye evaluations. deﬂnitima of peydwthempy, and the

detail- md aunt of
differences

W

date. mm. these stylistic

idiosynmtic, they follow! a
social
related
to
diffemoes, aid ﬁnir'miemncy
mum
with emeoteticm laments e meter dependence on social class
may be

dismissed as

Wiedgad.
Sud! mulatim and metnnt variable

variables than outwardly

intemtive processes,
physicim and the

of

an

15th

determined both by

mum‘s

staff

relatimships are
the attitude of the

me! by

the

matellatim

or history which patients present. Such relationships
mined mat in than psychiatric conditions where diwtic

criteria are leeet specific,

a,an

fining diseases of Imam etiology

where objective

criteria de-

absent. as in schizophmie.

peyoimmuis, personality md beluvior

W.

Under these

�-

——-»~.—..

.

0 .

.... Twp...

-‘--

~vv-ul'~w

5" 1m -.——.rw~‘~_.r

“mp—m...“

"m”.

.

v~-_.v...‘.. ...

m

«um”www.m—mrwv.r.w-‘.,r-r.—,.m.~ Nut-aw..." I"-~nr~rl’-'

Irav’r VW'FV‘wW-Pf'lm‘"- ._

mmwpomwthainiguity.m¢oh«mr's

mmwmmmuwmumormm
classified“, «Md-claims.
osmium.

1:313:11»qu

chalydoamudbyl’umidc,mnitxmdhfm (6)1ntha1r
studyafmiatimiadimiuwithinasinghimtitutim.

'nuyobuzwdﬂutputiummimdatrmmdiffcmtm

admtdifhrintypoofmm,mitalm,e¢mim.
mermaid-non. Simiﬂcmtdiffcmasdidm,m,in

“demmicwvimﬁmmm
Mm

“wwwmmmmwm.
wtmmmmmmmmm.mumwm
wmmammotdimmmmmitmIofﬂn

W.
WWWofmmismdmniml

mmnnhmwmmfcmdmmimb
tutimmmﬂm. unmmmammaemm
mimic-insults. Farminlhmimmtdwiﬂxm

Wyudmdpcmlmmﬁngmmnknpcimpmmto

fwﬁnlamttiu,huﬂufmtpatiem$mdu

W.mm.mﬂupmatmtmulu.

Arm,inmt.miahismstimlmiwinduﬁninga

Wat.kmpaﬂmufwﬁndmtpoﬂw.Mhma

mmamWWme
Whhaatmammults.

�mmmotmmmmmmqmny
olmwﬂnmmtofmwutyofpopumamfw
dogmofilhmsmgmeimtimﬁms, these {Wand

We

«ﬂeet the mhtiva
efficacy of the institutions.
Simﬁncvalmﬁmsmbaudmtmmﬁmdm’sommﬁngs,

arm
Mfmmmofimmmmrﬁminmicpsyw-

we

mum that tho

rennet variaticm in the criteria

Mam“.
Inwinimlfiﬂhidoatudym)itmpoamhmthat

M
WWW.
mam criteria of

were

utilized {or

mom

of

Itwmsuggastedﬁmttmmmr

ﬂumm'asodubwmdﬁnmmlexﬂtheﬁaw
ployad.

with

mmmumlymmmmmtsm.

ﬂu cuff of ﬂaming-r ibupital min; a tripartite rating
Em

Wmmemmgdmmmmum.

mmmemmﬁngmmmmmmtiwamim
ﬁmnlmmbmd.itisourmumtmtorlmr

duapommwapttcumiwinnuumto

Wamfwﬁnpaﬁmt's mpmitytomm wrigmile

for uppor ulna panama the criteria aphasia: such mien intangiblmm”avnloping insight,"or"mﬂd.nng‘a pmbm."

mmmmmmmmmmmmu
ofwdnfminpaymem.mhmbemgruﬂy
mmwmmmmmormm_mumm.

�Midesmmwamedmﬂmllnad-nhip
mamamimmmmmwmmnucmuy
defined. But diffm in instituﬂmal style and: it diffimlt
toebtlincmpambhdata.

Mmdmisnmmmpmblm

Wiml
Wu
meofwdxinmcmm. memormm
of the

use of

statistics,

«Many in

W,mewmwlmnthm
umitwiainmmwalmmwmidmﬁﬂmimof

Whpopuladmmauhdecttomiwmmnum
institutions

m charly mm for staff attitudu md atyla

wmlluminmminpaﬁmrtwpumm.

Thu-o

difﬁmltiwalaouﬂndtoﬂnfdlmdscimﬂahmomﬂm

mmwmymmmmmMuMm-m.

mmmammmwmmmu.
mmmdﬁmmmuMqummm

hypotm. ﬂamofthcm”adﬁaophmnia"or”paydw-

W18” to explore chm in paydnologial and biological

futuresofmtdﬂlmnhulodmascimww

Manama oboewatimtobanpoma
Mmmwzoday,mmmthmmmtom

negatiw

malts.

paydkalc munitions

Manly fwamfm tut of the

be
must
paid, to the elusiﬁcutim
Imam
Music.
mum

m,
wmymmmmmmmmnﬂmm
of aubjwts by "abjectiw" criteria tamer than our present

the oodnpoydxologiml aspects of ﬁn unmist-padom:

Wm.

�v. ....,

A.

n.

‘v ....._.—ur————‘.v—.

muw ‘ «m Two—u..— -..—.—v. .r. vvn&lt;~&gt;ww~wmﬂ‘rmew~——uir—I .—~ .

am

WMWW

Was,
Mmmdrsm,mm1mammamntvaﬂablaoin

dufimd by social class, age,

Fopuluﬂm

on. ”may tanning hospitals.
typo of

mm.

W

variablas incluad

dmutim of hmpitulimtim, diagnosis md
diuduma evaluation. Imimtitmimal diffaranous mm
in mint nodal class, yum of
and distri-

m

mam

Monofculifmiufums,butmtsga.

Wins

Thu

tions

m

in

W

Gamma“ mg institu-

uimifioumly diffamt in the pmdictad dimctim.
The imtitutim sawing
class patients did have the longest
Minn of stay, a higher pmportim of paydxmam'otic diagnoses
and

W

m min:

diagnostic

am,

W,

a lower proportion of

diam

and the poorest
too-Mag mastic fans of
ratings can; tho
imtttutim. Similu‘ly, the

m

patina

imitutim

ummmmmdidmmmrpemcr

houpitulisutim, 1m proportion of psydxmamdc diagnoses,
and the
discharg- evaluations.

Wvariation
on
ma
mm
m
muss

with

W
mm

not

and

Such

dim, Wm
hum

institutimo

objwmdam is

in psychiatric practices followed u pattern
class &lt;11!qu mg thu momma.

as idiosyncratic.

in institutions! style make madam of
of houpitalizatim and treatment mats

{:1th

ma tea-nuts,

and the mad

for

m

«item m:- the classification: of psymiati'ic populu~

mind.

�REFERENCES

and
D.
J.
T.
Levinson,
Frenkel-Brunswik,
W.,
E.,
Adorno,
and
The
N.
R.
Harper
Authoritarian
Personality.
Sanford,
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,
Mental

Inc.,

A. B. and

Illness:

Redlich, F.

C.

Community Study.
New York, 1958, 442 pp.
A

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

M.
M.
and
Social Factors in
Fink,
Pollack,
L.,
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.

Kahn, R.

J. Hillside Hosp.,

1957, 6: 216—228.

M.
M.
and
Sociopsychologic
Fink,
Pollack,
L.,
Mental
in
Treatments
a
Voluntary
of
Psychiatric
Aspects
and
Ratings
of
Discharge
Duration
Hospitalization,
Hospital:
Diagnosis. Argh, Gen Psyghia§., 1959, A; 565-574.

Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink, M.

Social Attitude

(Ca1—

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J4_Nexy&amp;_mgntg_ﬂls,,

1960, 1395 187—192.

.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
116:
127-132.
1959,
Ameza_J‘_£a¥£hiat.,
Hospital.

7. Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved

______.____——————-———

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission

Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

Hospital

N

Class

WM”

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IllllﬂiilllllllIIIIEEEEHIIIIIIIIIIIIﬂﬂZﬂIIIIIIII

I

Social

III

31%

7%

3%

II

51

20

28

III

17

34

13

H

IV

1

34

28

V

0

5

28

”'1‘"
"

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p&lt;{.001

,,_-_1_A_s-__1.______
19%

20— 39

=3. 9;

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

--—--—-—
x2 =

F

Score

df= 4; p=n. s.

=

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05
§3z

20%

50

38

17

42

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Variables
Treatment
in
Differences
InterhOSpital
EMBnninger

Hospital

Treatment

Psychotherapy

21%

36%

24%

Somatic

43

64

68

Other

36

-—

8

x2

Duration
.

0?
HOSpltal—

lzat1°n

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

IlﬁﬂﬂﬂﬂllllIIIlﬂEﬂIIIIIIIIZIIIIIII

N

Type of

Hillside

=

82.8- df=4

-m**
7

months

7-11 months

'

.11 months

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

Discharge Improved
Evaluation

nimproved

X

=

29.3' df=4' -&lt;.001

85

54%

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

17

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

29
X

=

23.8' df=4‘ -&lt;.001

�Duration of HOSpitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30—39

61

3O

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

l4

�AMA SPECIALTY JOURNALS

'

'
lC

'

Am 6 r1 C a n M e d al A S S O C l at] O n
535 NORTH DEARBORN STREET

-

'

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60610

wa—

AREA CODE 312

527-1500

910-221-0300

November

2 , 19 65

Archives of Dermatology
.
um 0
an i:Chialldr:n
Sinse;ses
Archives Of
Envir nrnent al Heal I h
.°
Archives °f
General Psychiatry

Archives of
internal Medicine
Archives of Neurology
Archives of Ophthalmology
Arc ives o ‘0‘ o l a ‘V n g o ‘ o 3’
"_
Arcthes of Pathology
A'c h'was ° f S“ '3 eW

JOHN H. TALEOTT, MD, DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

ROBERT W. MAYO, EXECUTIVE MANAGING EDITOR
NORMAN

D. RICHEY,

MANAGING EDITOR

Fink , MD
Department of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
University of Missouri
5400 Arsenal St.
St. Louis, Mo. 63139

Max

Dear Doctor Fink:

edited copy of your manuscript entitled, ”SociopsychoA
Treatment:
of
Aspects
Report of
Psychiatric
logical
Treatments in Three voluntary Hospitals,” is enclosed for
your final checking and approval. Also enclosed is a layout that shows placement of title, copy, and illustrations.
Please indicate any necessary changes in a covering letter
rather than on the edited typescript. we will be responsible for checking your material against proofs.

An

manuscript has been edited according to present AMA
style. For example, most abbreviations appear without
periods.

The

are currently striving for brevity in article titles. If
the modified title of your paper is not satisfactory, please \/
supply another that will fit into two lines of no more than
40 characters and Spaces each.

we

L
,ZU

Chi,
for reprint purposes, the one

Is address at end of article,
you will be using on a relatively long-termlaasis?

1

Specialty Journals publish acknowledgments only to personsbﬁ1p
P
have
aided
in
that
a
a
study
or organizations
major way, as,
for example, by supplying drugs or funds, making statistical
analyses, or doing pathological studies.

AMA

references have been renumbered to conform to our rule
requiring numerically consecutive citation.

Your

�Fink,
St. Louis,

Max

MD

-2-

Mo.

11/2/65

According to our calculations,the paper will occupy 6 printed
pages. Please note that any new material you may wish to
submit at this time will be acceptable only if it can be
compensated for by deletion of an equal amount of copy now

included.

have retyped the references so that an accurate copy estimate could be made. Although we have reread the typescript, we request that you also check for any errors of
omissions that may have slipped through.

we

correction and return of your typescript will help us
get it into print as fast as possible. Please return it,
along with the layout, in the enclosed self-addressed envelope no later than November 9. For your convenience we
are also enclosing a reprint order form with the correct
number of pages indicated.
Prompt

Yours very

amh

,

udith

M.

truly,

Kiolbassa

�.

"luau—“new .-

,

.

H-

MW.

-1

~

»~v

-

we. w

re

,-_....‘--—-~~w—~- «V...

WP

v,“

mm“- "WWW.

w.

1“.

-

-..

.. .

5. 1965

Judith H. Kiolbesse
Mariam Medical Association
535 North Deerbom Street
Chicago,

Illinois

60610

Dear ﬂies Kiolbesse:

Myouwrymdafcrymmletterofﬂovemrz. I
shelltrytomreechitenineeqmnoe.
The article title is satisfactory, elthcugh I think the
"A

Mt

sub-heed should reed
in Three Voluntary
Report of
Hospitals.“ 'me word "treetlsents" end "treetsent" are probably

interminable, but in this inetmoe, I think the singular

{on is preferable.

However, both eve acceptable.

While the address at the end of the erticle is one that
will be used for e lmg~tem basis, I would prefer that you
and that is the Depertnmt of
change this for Dr.
Psychiatry. University of axioego. Chicago, Illinois.

m.

edmouledgmt included the name of Dr. Max Pollack.
In ell the studies done at Hillside, Dr. Pollack was e coper'tioipmt. In this study he was one of the three people
she visited eech of the institutions. Hmever, in writing
this report, there were some disagreements as to the omclusims,
mdheelectednottobeeoo—euthoroftheetudy. Hy
essccietes and I. wild, however, like to indicate his
assistance, and for this meson, I think a statusent, "me
cooperation of Dr. Mex Polleok is gratefully edmwledged"
“me

would be

appropriate.

met.

numbered refermces are
I m assuming
thet the Jamel limits the timer of authors to three, and
The

metthieisthereesmmythatintwooftheoitetions
the co~euthore are omitted. If this is not e gmerel rule,

perhaps in this instance the oo—wthcrs could be

listed.

page la, in addition to the notation regarding the coopemtim
of Dr. Pollack, would you please damage the address of Dr. Kern
from Hontifiore Hospitel to: Department of Psychiatry, University
of Omicego, Chicago, Illinois.
On

.uw

vs.— ‘ =. 2.. .: “may.“

.

.,..

�Miss Kiolbassa

-2-

Also, the dates 1959-1952 , which follow the statement donoeming
the origin of the study, are immutable by themelvee. In our
original report, we used the sentence, "his study was dorm when
the authors were associated at the Department of Experimental
Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital. 19594962." If 30m full sentence

ofﬂuiekindionottobeinoluded,thmlwmldouggestthat
the dates 1959-1982 be omitted.

I

have read the

text carefully,

and

find two small corrections

midxlhavemked. mm2,naarﬁmbotton, theoomotimo
putaolashlinethmwﬁthemwerS, mdthiemaybemolmto
1’
the printer.

It

should read "the California

Scale. 03,5)

page 10, mfemoe 7 should be number 6, and
mmked this copy.
cm

I

have so

is a table. and them is a symbol which I do not
mderatmd. In the first oolm."omplete remission"is aplit
with a synbol mien to me would indicate that the word “mission”
should be under "ooeplete." If that is so, this may be molear.
I do not know how this will be not, but ”oanplete minim,"
"amicedly homo," "mdemtely normed” are each word pairs
that should not be split. If this is too long for the oolmn,
than I hope you will indicate féthat "markedly mmved” fit
Page 19

together by appropriate spacing.

Tﬁis is the first time that I have had the opportunity to
edit a mmxmoz-ipt in this fashion, and I must say that I found

it quite helpful.
opportunity toworkwithyou, andI
Myouforthe
look forward to the final results.
Sincerely yours .

Pink, NJ).
Professor of Psychiatry

Max
HP :

in

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�~

This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L.I. New York, 19591-1962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial
"
is
acknowledged.
Hospital
gratefully
The

.

‘

Aided, in part, by grants My-2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine,-University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich hast reported significant relation—
ships between an individual's position in the social class structure
.and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded.

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to paye In anr
thsae surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings, In contrast, younger, native born/aim?
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingsa
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i.eo, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosisf
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredo
in-ehe-survey—rEpUTtEd-hETE)[it was suggested that dif—
"’4”“’A“'
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for iht patients within Hillside
Hospitala To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -¢ Hillside
HosPital, the C. Fo Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston, These institutions were
selected with the Fr:ec£3£ipn that hing-had diverse treatment modalities h’&amp;Y‘
available,;d££:eoi¥ed-paeients
of different social classeso
equally
Each provided short—term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapyo
This study was designed to determine the population characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions,

�_2_
METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo-

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
status? The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2-factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult/however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intraehospital comparisons/.and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra-institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which—ie-reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

repgfting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital guanine taken for granted and either ignored or mentioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institu~
tions, however, the.mnny;differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcomeo
When

l. Designation of Type of Treatment: The criteria for
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy" differed among
the institutions, making comparisons difficult,
At Menninger

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia-

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the ‘2
psychiatric residentﬁyere considered part of routine administrative
patient care.
fkysa4.¢

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident, Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedo
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
was designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychowas necessary for members of the study team to interview
therapy

it

the residentgresponsible for each case.
fkjsKJAu

Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systems, Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
2°

Diagnosis:

�Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of improvement at the three hosPitals varied in format and detaily The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)o For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
30

institutionsa

Table

Q

M’s

_———"’

Inter-hos ital
&lt;:; B.ﬁ~~,»n--__
"M..-

{§_‘

10

The

Com

II

arisonSN

Sociopsychological Variables

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observed, At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
/AE Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—”
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduateo
0) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fiftynone per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
cent with scores of 50 or above -- the higher F scores being associated with higher degrees of stereotypy, In contrast, at Hillside
thirty-one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 30.
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed, These diff—
erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables

\“"2.

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

a) Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received

somatic therapy than at Hillside
b) Duration of

(64%)

or

MMHC

Hospitalization:

(68%)

(Table IV),

three insti—
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)o
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of
hospitalization.
The

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"o The highest
percentage of "recovered" or ”much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centerm

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one—quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty perncent of the
populationo
zx

Table IV

‘“

CLJLRS

."”

C: Intra—Hos

s-‘wa.

~~

r“

e~

ital

Com

arisons

‘h53

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital com—
parisons, However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillside. Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periodst
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year,
The

Table

V

�DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var—
iables -- duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7)“
swudy
Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospitauﬁﬁ;;:’
confirmed. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data. While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow
a pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, Egg}, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disordersq Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications

among

the

three wards and among three administrators on one ward“ As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one institution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi-

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social backgroundc It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployedo This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined, But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapieso The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hos—
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in—
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distri—
bution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionse
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the in—
stitutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric populations is emphasizedo
These

�REFERENCES

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality.
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

Illness:

New

Redlich, F.
Community Study.

A. B. and
A

C.

J.

and
Harper and

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

York, 1958, 442 pp.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216-228.

Kahn, R.

.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization,
Diagnosis. Arch, Gen Psychia;., 1959,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink,

M.

Sociopsychologic
Voluntary Mental
Discharge Ratings and
1; 565—574.

Social Attitude (Cal-

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. 14_lkuahhlkuxLL_Disu,

1960, llQ: 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. AmeIa_J4_E£¥£hiaL., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, 1Q; 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile.Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comparisons for Sociopsxchological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
I

Class

31%

7777 7 7

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34

IV

1

V

O

34

.

5

l|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x2

77

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health

IIIIIﬂBiﬂIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIII

N

Social

Hillside

7 7N7 777—777
7

=

121.5; df=8: p’{.001

7m__-—

-77777777—77

20 39

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
iMenninger

Hospital

Treatment

Psychotherapy

36%

21%

Somatic

Other

um—
=82 8'

N

Duration
0?

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

IIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIKIIIDIIIHIIIIIIJJIIIIII

N

Type of

Hillside

7

months

7—11

months

Hospitallzat1°n .11 months

df= 4

.

.001

Z

'

A

70

13

42

27

65

31

5

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

23.8' df=4' -&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20—29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

l4

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

‘Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�:0".

mm»... can“ b. awn-u a mi: “tum-Ma
in
a
M an“ ”MI "in“ am:
tm‘nt It“ ”mm
van-mm
pap-nun
”humbly!
m trams
m
um
to
but!
up»: u “mun" pram-I. «Wu!
h
by
no
“at:
m
pints“:
m
“um. a
n
manna"
u. wanna» .1 Wm at hum: mu 1 ”tint
up mm“. In! mumm- Irin h nut mm in

m

than

Mm

m.

pmmuu

I!"
”not“
Mt
“am“:
Mm

hut with, $1334, than “I “scan" uﬁnu «ﬂung
«In». or knu- uum Mum-mt an that. a n

W“
mchm“ ”than”2le
at

numb”,

nnﬂnn.
“than” an

and

«mutton o:

a“
nun»’M“”
a:

citation!

«yuan-n tum
v3.01:
2»
a» mu
pmmuu «a «mausuun. In.
an
ﬂatly Imam“ hr tun-much, an“: and um (7) u

that it“: of «than: as “was: um: a am. in“.
huh. 3.; than“ it“. ”mm mum}! animal! to
551’:an
an m mm in m. t: await», mm:
sum, man, an 0:
awn-mt «um-«m

m

mm.

m
m
mthmulnhhiutmummd. u “unawaI“ am, bum,
11:01:

«In “no

in

“and“

it.

and. as!

“St-rm mu tub-rut 1: m ywmﬂn.

�SociopsydholOgical Aspects of

Psydhiatrie Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

;R0berrt L,

.lﬁahn,

1311313332!

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

‘—
NEIIIIiiiiIIiE§E¥§

�-7-

’4‘,

DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter—institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment variables -— duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations {7},
The

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmeda The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionsc
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded datae While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged.
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, i;gf, where objective criteria de—
fining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorderso Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2914">
                <text>Sociopsychological aspects of psychiatric treatment in three voluntary hospitals. A.M.A. Arch Gen Psychiat. 14:20-5.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2915">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2916">
                <text>mfp-02-01-004-59b-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2917">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2918">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Siegel, Nathaniel</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2919">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2920">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2921">
                <text>Reprint, [preprint], drafts, letters, review board postcard, </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2922">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2923">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74494">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81055">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87616">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94177">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="286" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="77">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0f6719a23fdc7ec86b84e3ad0121dcb7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2c174223139f67b6ca449ef570bd2067</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100703">
                    <text>SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO
REFUSE CONVULSIVE THERAPY

K

MAX POLLACK, PH.D.

Reprinted from THE

Vol. 132, N0.
L

2

Copyright ©

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE

by The Williams
Printed in U.S.A.

1961

&amp;

February,

Wilkins C0.

1961

�JOURNAL or NERVOUS AND MENTAL DIsEAsE
Volume 132, No. 2, February 1961

Reprinted from THE

Printed in U.S.A.

SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO
REFUSE CONVULSIVE THERAPY
MAX POLLACK, PH.D.1

The growing recognition of the relation of
social factors to referral for and response to
somatotherapy in psychiatric treatment has
stimulated increased study of “drop-outs”—
patients who refuse to start or to continue
treatment. Although the problem of “dropouts” is a major one in somatotherapy, it
has received little attention. In convulsive
therapy it is considered one of the most fre—
quent “complications” of treatment (1) yet
it is infrequently discussed (3, 7) and no
systematic studies have been devoted to it.
Systematic studies of “drop-outs” have
been limited for the most part to patients in
psychotherapy in out—patient facilities (4, 5,
9, 19, 20). These studies have consistently
shown marked differences in social and psychological characteristics of patients who remain in psychotherapy and those who fail to
continue. Those patients who remain in
therapy have more years of education and
who
those
class
social
than
of
higher
are
leave. In addition, their social attitudes, as
measured by the California F Scale, show
“less so—called conventionalism, stereotypy
and less of an uncompromising insistence
that ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ can be distinguished” (20).
In sociopsychologic studies of the patient
population of Hillside Hospital (12, 13) age,
education, place of birth and degree of
stereotypy, as measured by the F Scale, were
related to selection for, and response to,
convulsive therapy. Those patients who
were older, had fewer years of education,
were foreign-born and who manifested high
scores on the F Scale were most likely to receive convulsive therapy, be hospitalized for
Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., New York.
1

and MY—2715, National
Institute of Mental Health, U. S. Public Health
Service.
Aided by grants

MY—2092

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

a shorter period, and be rated as improved at
time of discharge. In contrast, patients who
were younger, better educated, native-born
and who obtained low scores on the F Scale,
most often received psychotherapy as their
sole form of treatment, were hospitalized for
a longer time, and were more likely to be
discharged with a rating of unimproved.
Thus, the determination of psychiatric treatment was viewed as an interactive process,
and related to the background, cultural
values and communicative pattern of both
therapist and patient.
In view of this relation of psychosocial
factors to selection for and response to treat—
ment, it was postulated that in a psychotherapeutically—oriented hospital patients who
refuse or fail to complete convulsive therapy
would be signiﬁcantly younger, better educated, and be less stereotyped and conventional than patients who completed a course
of therapy. This study was undertaken to
test this hypothesis.
PROCEDURE

The seventy-ﬁve consecutive iii-patients
(27 males and 48 females) referred for con—
vulsive therapy at Hillside Hospital during
the one year period from October 1, 1957 to
September 30, 1958 were included in this
study. Hillside Hospital is a non-proﬁt
institution for the treatment of voluntary
patients. Psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary
method of treatment, with various somatotherapies available when necessary. All pa—
tients are seen for individual psychotherapy
three times a week, with psychotherapy
continuing when other treatment, 6.9., convulsive therapy, is administered.
Three social (age, education and nativity)
and one psychological measure (the Cali153

�154

POLLACK A ND FINK

fornia F Scale), were employed. A ten-item
modiﬁcation of the F Scale (6, 14) was administered to 53 referrals prior to treatment.
In this task, the subject reads 10 statements
and indicates whether he agrees or disagrees
with each statement, and to what extent.
The score given for each item ranges from
one to seven and the range of total scores is
ten to seventy. The greater the subject’s
agreement, with the statement, the higher
the score obtained. The statements themselves are extreme, conventional and stereotyped expressions. lr‘or example, one statement is, “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”
Patients were referred for convulsive therapy by the psychiatric resident with the ap—
proval, frequently at the suggestion, of his
supervisor. The referral form requesting
treatment was sent to the psychiatrist in
charge of the convulsive therapy unit for
medical examination and the institution of
treatment. Thus, it was possible to determine those patients who were referred for
treatment but who refused to start. Convulsive therapy was generally administered
three times a week, and grand mal convulsions were induced with the standard Medcraft alternating current instrument.
RESULTS

Of the 75 referrals for convulsive therapy,
13 refused treatment. Of these, seven failed
to start and six refused to continue treatment. In the latter group, the number of

treatments ranged from three to eight—
short of the generally prescribed course of at
least twelve treatments.
TABLE 1
Mean Age, Education and F Score by Group
N

Group

'

Acceptance
Refusal
Mean Difference
(One—tailed t
p&lt;

test)

62
13

(ﬁgs)

Educa-

0:325)

40.3 11.6
29.7 13.7
— 10.6 +2.1
2.5
1.9
.01

.025

F Score

48.7
37.7
— 10.0

2.2

.025

Social and Psychologic Factors: The group
of patients who accepted a full course of
convulsive therapy was signiﬁcantly older,
less educated and manifested a higher mean
F score than the group that refused treat—

ment (Table 1). Furthermore, 37 per cent of
the acceptance group were foreign-born as
compared to eight per cent of the refusal
group. While there was considerable overlap
between groups with respect to these factors,
the refusal group was more homogeneous
than the acceptance group. Thus, there were
no patients in the refusal group who had less
than ten years of education (69 per cent of
the group had attended college) and none
were over ﬁfty years of age. In contrast, 27
per cent of the acceptance group never went
beyond grade school (eight years or less)
and 31 per cent were ﬁfty years or older.
Differences in occupation between groups
paralleled the differences in education. Thus,
none of the patients in the refusal group were
unskilled or manual workers. They were in
clerical, professional and business vocations,
Whereas ten subjects in the acceptance
group were unskilled workers. Housewives
were excluded from this tabulation.
Relation to Diagnosis: The discharge diagnoses of seventy-three patients fell into four
major categories: psychoneurosis, schizophrenia, manic-depressive, or involutional
psychoses. Two patients were classiﬁed as
“psychotic depression” without further
speciﬁcation. Although there was no statistically signiﬁcant difference in diagnostic
composition between the group accepting
and those refusing treatment, the groups
were dissimilar with respect to the incidence
of the involutional psychoses (Table 2). No
patient in the refusal group was discharged
with a diagnosis of involutional psychosis,
whereas 24 per cent of the acceptance group
were so diagnosed. There was also a high
positive correlation between this diagnosis
and the sociopsychological factors studied.
Thus, the mean age (56.7 years) and F score
(61.4) were higher while the years of educa-

�155

REFUSAL OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY

tion (9.2 years) was lower than that for the
total refusal group (Table 1).
Relation to Improvement Ratings: At the
discharge conference held by the Medical
Director each patient is assigned one of four
improvement ratings: recovered, much improved, improved or unimproved. The incidence of recovered and much improved
ratings was signiﬁcantly lower in the refusal
group (Table 3). Six patients, all in the ac—
ceptance group, were rated as recovered.
The hospital discharges were more closely
associated with refusal or discontinuation of
treatment in the refusal group.
DISCUSSION

The present study conﬁrms and extends
previous ﬁndings in this laboratory (2, 12,
13) in demonstrating the importance of social
factors and their psychological correlates in
the selection for and response to psychiatric
treatment. It supports the hypothesis that in
a psychoanalytically-oriented hospital patients who refuse convulsive therapy would
more closely resemble those who remain in
psychotherapy and differ from those who
are selected for and treated with convulsive
therapy.
The lower 1“ scores in the refusal group
than in the acceptance group are correlated
with a less compliant attitude toward authority and a more analytic approach in interpersonal activities. Review of the patients’ hospital records revealed that negativism, belligerence, uncooperativeness and
attempts to manipulate the staff were more
common in the refusal group. For example,
38 per cent of the refusal group as compared
with only 17 per cent of the acceptance group
formally petitioned the Medical Director for
discharge from the hospital. (Almost all
these patients withdrew their request for
discharge shortly after the initial request).
Referral for convulsive treatment was more
often associated with problems of management, e.g., disturbing the ward or eloping
from the hospital, than for depressive or
confused thinking. In contrast, a higher

TABLE 2
Discharge Diagnosis by Group
Group

Manic.
Depressrve
Psychosis

Schizo.
-

Psychoneurosls

phrenla

Acceptance7 (11%)25 (40%)
2 (15%) 7 (54%)
Refusal
X2

13
4

Involu.
tlonal
Psychosis

(21%) 15 (24%)
(31%) 0 (0)

= 2.28, p = n.s.
TABLE

3

Discharge Improvement Ratings by Group
Group

Acceptance
Refusal
X2

Recoveredﬁ
Much

Improved

34 (55%)
3

(23%)

Improved

Unimproved

(31%)
5 (38%)

(15%)
5 (38%)

19

9

= 6.41, p = .05

percentage of the acceptance group were
referred for convulsive therapy for alleviation of depressive symptoms.
There is increasing evidence that accept—
ance or rejection of psychiatric treatment is
related to learned attitudes toward treatment by both patients and therapist (8, 9,
16, 17, 21). Most often these attitudes which
correlate with socio-economic status are
formed far in advance of treatment, and are
most likely an intrinsic part of the person’s
repertoire of behavior. Thus, patients from
lower class backgrounds more frequently
view psychiatric treatment as nonverbal and
in physical terms whereas typically “the
middle class patient is predisposed toward
the acceptance of psychotherapy even before he arrives at the clinic” (9).
In the sample studied there were many
expressions of a negative attitude toward
convulsive therapy long before the referral
for convulsive therapy had been made. One
patient, in treatment for several years prior
to her current hospital admission, terminated
treatment and transferred to another psy—
chiatrist on each occasion when convulsive
therapy was recommended. Another patient
asked to sign the voluntary certiﬁcation
form on admission, appended the following
note. “P.S., If I am given shock treatment

�156

POLLACK AND FINK

I’ll either kill myself or leave the hospital.”
Other patients, particularly those who have
been in individual psychotherapy prior to

hospital admission, state that their previous
therapists instructed them not to submit to
convulsive therapy in that it would be harm-

ful.

Perhaps more important than either attitude of the patient or the psychiatrist is the
factor of consistency of attitudes. Klerman
et al., (17) have reported that young resident
psychiatrists with psychoanalytic orientations frequently have unfavorable attitudes
toward somatic therapy and are ambivalent
about prescribing such treatment. In the
present study there were many indications
that referral for convulsive therapy was not
the “free” choice of the resident physician
but was made only after considerable pressure by administrative and nursing person-

nel.

A recent study by Kaplan and Lefkowits
(15) of staff and environmental factors

associated with referral for drug therapy in
this hospital demonstrated that the psychiatrist’s tolerance for disturbed behavior
was much higher than that of nurses and
other personnel. Frequently the resident
physician placed a premium on helping the
patient modify his behavior without resort
to somatotherapy. A similar observation was
made by Sabshin and Ramot (21) and by
Klerman (17) who found that “psychiatrists
treating a patient with psychotherapy were
unusually reluctant to add drug therapy.”
Such attitudes may be conveyed to patients
either overtly or covertly. Such observations
reinforce the ﬁndings of Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (18) that “despite protestations
by clinicians that their reference is always
the individual patient, clinicians, in fact
may be so overly committed to a particular
psychiatric school of thought, that the pa—
tient’s diagnosis and treatment is largely
predetermined.”
The studies here would suggest that the
psychiatrist’s ambivalent attitude toward

treatment is not a general attitude but is
related to the “social distance” of the patient
to himself. The psychiatric resident frequently has less difﬁculty in recommending
somatotherapy for a lower class patient but
is indecisive when it comes to making a
similar treatment referral for a patient who
is culturally more like himself.
The ﬁndings that objectors to convulsive
therapy were more often discharged from
the hospital as clinically unimproved is
consistent with previous observations (7).
Gordon (7) classiﬁed objectors into two
categories—poorly oriented catatonic subjects who offered resistance to the treatment
and responded with clinical improvement;
and a better oriented group who objected to
treatment on an attitudinal basis claiming
they were “not in need of them.” This latter
group were refractory to the clinical beneﬁts
of the treatment. Almost all of the patients
in the refusal group of the present study
could be classiﬁed in the latter group.
It is of interest that most of the patients
who refused convulsive treatment were
prognostically poor selectees for convulsive
treatment. In previous studies (2, 10, 11)
we have shown that the incidence of ratings
of improvement at discharge in young, welleducated, low F score patients was signiﬁeantly lower than in the older, less educated,
more stereotyped patients. The refusal group
is part of that group of patients who are
neither “ideal” patients for convulsive
treatment nor are they very responsive to
milieu treatment and psychotherapy.
While referral for convulsive therapy in
this and other hospitals has been markedly
reduced within the past few years, the problems associated with attitude toward treatment, of which treatment refusal is but one
aspect, are of persistent importance. In the
absence of speciﬁc therapies for the majority
of psychiatric disorders the further study of
decision-making in psychiatric treatment
may help delineate the forces associated with
selection of therapy.

�157

REFUSAL OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY
SUMMARY

8. HAEFNER, D. 1’., SACKs,

REFERENCES
Treatment of Mental Disorder,
p. 223. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1953.
2. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M.
Psychological factors affecting individual
differences in behavioral response to convulsive therapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 128: 243—
1. ALEXANDER, L.

248, 1959.
3. FLESCHER, J. The “discharging

function” of
electric shock and the anxiety problem.
Psychoanal. Rev., 37: 277-280, 1960.
4. FRANK, J. D., GLIEDMAN, L. H., IMBER, S. 1).,
NASH, E. H., JR. AND STONE, A. R. Why
patients leave psychotherapy. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. Psychiat., 77: 283—299, 1957.
5. FREEDMAN, N., ENGELHARDT, D. M., HAN—
KOFF, L. B., GLICK, B. S., KAYE, H., BUCHWALD, J. AND STARK, P. Drop-out from outpatient psychiatric treatment. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. Psychiat., 80: 657—666, 1958.
6. GALLAGER, E. B., LEVINSON, D. J. AND ERLICH, I. Some sociopsychological charac—
teristics of patients and their relevance for
psychiatric treatment. In Greenblatt, M.,
Levinson, D. J. and Williams, R. W., eds.
The Patient and the Mental Hospital, pp.
263—285. Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., 1957.
7. GoRDON, H. L. ()bjectors to electric shock
treatment are refractory to its therapy.
New York J. Med., 46: 407—410, 1946.

AND

MAsoN,

A. S. Physicians’ attitudes toward chemotherapy as a factor in psychiatric patients’

As part of a continuing investigation of
the relation of sociopsychological factors to

psychiatric treatment, the present study
was concerned with the sociopsychological
characteristics of patients who refused to
start or to continue convulsive therapy.
Thirteen of the 75 consecutive voluntary patients referred for convulsive therapy refused treatment during a one year period in
a psychoanalytically-oriented institution.
These patients were younger, better edu—
cated and had lower scores on the CaliforniaF Scale than the group that accepted convulsive therapy. The diagnosis of involutional psychosis was absent in the refusal
group, and patients in the refusal group were
more often discharged as unimproved.
The acceptance or rejection of psychiatric
treatment is discussed in terms of learned
attitudes toward psychiatric treatment by
both patient and doctor.

J. M.

.

responses to medication. J. Nerv. Ment.
Dis., 131: 64—69, 1960.
IMBER, S. D., FRANK, J. 1)., (,iLIEl)MAN, L. H
NASH, E. H. AND SToNE, A. R. Suggesti—
bility, social class and the acceptance of
psychotherapy. J. Clin. Psychol., 12: 341—

344, 1956.
10. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Personality factors

in behavioral response to electroshock

11.

therapy. J. Neuropsychiat., 1: 45—49, 1959.
KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M. Prognostic
application of psychological techniques in
convulsive therapy. Dis. Nerv. Syst., supp.

20, pp. 180—184, 1959.
12. KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M. Social
factors in the selection of therapy in a

voluntary mental hospital. J. Hillside Hosp,
6: 216—228, 1957.

R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Sociopsychologic aspects of psychiatric
treatment. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,

13. KAHN,

1: 565—574, 1959.

L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Social attitude (California F Scale) and
convulsive therapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.,

14. KAHN, R.

130: 187—192, 1960.
15. KAPLAN, A. AND LEFKOWITS, H. J. Inﬂuence
of staff attitudes and environmental factors

on treatment selection. J. Hillside Hosp.

In press.

Staff attitudes, decisionmaking and the use of drug therapy in the
mental hospital. In Denber, H. C. B. Research Conference on the Therapeutic Community, pp. 191—214. Thomas, Springﬁeld,

16. KLERMAN, G. L.

111., 1959.

17. KLERMAN, G. L., SHARAF,
AND LEVINSON, D. J.

M., HOLZMAN, M.
Sociopsychological
characteristics of resident psychiatrists and
their use of drug therapy. Amer. J. Psy-

chiat., 117:

111—117, 1960.

B., DINITZ, S. AND LEFTON, M.
Psychiatric orientation and its relation to
diagnosis and treatment in a mental hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127—132, 1959.
19. ROSENTHAL, D. AND FRANK, J. D. The fate
of psychiatric clinic out-patients assigned
to psychotherapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 127:
18. PASAMANICK,

330—343, 1958.

20. RUBENSTEIN, E. A. AND LORR, M. A. A com-

parison of terminators and remainers in
outpatient psychotherapy. J. Clin. Psychol.,
12: 345—348, 1956.

J. Pharmacotherapeutic evaluation and the psychiatric
setting. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.,

21. SABSHIN, M. AND RAMROT,

75: 362—370, 1956.

��We.

lama-b.1031“!

at

tutu. cantata norm

In:

rum

rum. and

“no“. at.

In rm IJ.

no What a: mum»: manna-y ' mum mum '
In.
v.1.
at...
at...
a»
18-1715.
”-10,!
of In“:
an
lulu-.1
mu
it
Intuit.
put
'0’.
M“. ma. M“

a“...

11: 9/60

�Iantipcyohnlnctosl chnruc‘arttttna at ratsenta

taint.

tit.
Q0

thirty:

eouvnlatvu

it.

cuoicz
rolaﬁton
tautlro
at
it.
and rdtpCIlc $0 Ions$0$tnrapr in porthtatrtt

staring ructun‘tsnn at

rclarv¢1

(It

mm. m sum-umainr£
M trout-nus. Althtlch
mu tauttuao

yutatasl

it: ratio. .3

i!

a: Fawn“

to

.-

«- ymm a "an-mm" u a mu m s. mutt-rm. u

1%
1a
couwnlltvu
In
$503.37
III ricolvli littlo tiluﬁitn.
oou§idorti CI. n! it: un¢$ troqunnt 'nlnpxtac‘lonc' If ﬁrutﬁn
aunt (1) 13¢ ££ in antvocnoutlr dinuutaod (3,1) and no ayutunn:&amp;c
ain‘t-u lava tutu duvntod it it.

Int-nun

am: a

“drip-MI“

have

In»

mm

tu-

m not m a nun» u gunman" 1: out-”um
«was.»
(magnum)
than
um mummy
suntan
..

adotnl
3nd pnrhhuloutaul charac‘nrw
dittouuuaol
tn
than: atrial
1:11.. at ptt4:a$u it: tannin tn pirutothornlr uni ti... It.
£111 to caustlnn.
tannin t: thattpy-tnvn Int:
paiaauat
who
oduunﬁtnn
and
than
30.1.1
013::
at
at
hialcr
sh...
art
gust:
U:
1“”. In «mu...
mu:
Baltturuxn I lgalo, than “low. manualzsd couvnntSontltnu. Icgr¢o~
twp; ‘3‘ 1.3. a: II Inuau’rCIttsu: titansonct ‘hnt 'rtchﬁ’ an:
‘arcuc‘ tun bu ‘10‘algutlhnd' (to).
In socioplrthologtc itnlsoi it ﬁt: yntanut )aytlntlau ct
(12.13) no.
Ian-u.
pm. at
10:20. or otartoiwpy. an na‘iurud by it: I 8.519, Utr- tilti.‘ to
tclucttou tit. and roupauna to. can'tlusvo shortly. than. p¢‘10nsa

it...

W

mam

it.

int“,

man,

n ma“

m

um m

�-2...

m m. am. in am run 0: mm. mo tau-om
than all In Mum huh um. a m I an. an no»

In
“an”.
t
Win
mum
awm mu. m N am a ups-mi u «a “ «um.
mm;

‘0

"not“

I: mun».

be

”an“ m m m». bum uuum. nun

mmvhctWMImu-Iﬁolluu. and“.
rmtwl yam-Wm at am «to m at “has. my
non-1mm: sham-run. mmw. mans-u

M. M 4m“.
If par-mutt “an.“ m um :- u «mm.» mu,
um «um to in
«1m
«4
mm;
mm.
Watt"
and
a
yum m mm ”no“.
I: van a an ”10“.!“
run" a
«noun a: m rm» “Inna-at. u m mans-d
that
urn-um
pmlmlpﬂﬂum
mm: aunt: m
can
5.
mm»
mu
a
a
sauna-u:
mm mm
m. mm «mm.
and
an
at
n
autumn «mumz
mm.
than ”an“ m
a
this
emu
”my
a
mm.
mm
an mm to an m: Wu.
«mug:

with a

nut;

01‘

Ill-proud.

”um

tan a»

�W:
m nasty-nu

In»
us than) ”tuna at can ulsive “can,“ nun“.
1951
‘0
1.
the
am
"in
you
wt“ mu:
but“! dull.
1953
1111““
1:
3%
OM.
till
mum
Cum
m
a:
In
nun-Mn
I
“mung a. mm“
but“: u
«um-«aw

“quanta

and

(2‘!

«mum "um. yummy-.usum pmmhum
with
9.! rum“ to it. ”an"
a tum-cu, mam
am£711.10}.
In. matey. u: putat“inmate.
um
a
ummm
not.
um “! mum ”um-arm

m

W
m
m

pm
What,
M
”hi?!
«um
9mm
u.

my.

u

«on: (m.

«an-nun an wars»)

and

on ”you.

may“.
“an:
(m§mum
3
{6.15)
manna-i
at
m sun
m mama
mam
In
M
[$3.00.
5)
M!
Morn!uul'
mm».
h
my».

M.

10

1'

auto), mo

1

Inn-ut- m mmm MW in an.»

nu- man

“than, at

1»

or

slum-a

mt «mi. m um. um m:

Mtuwnnmulmummnusuumnma

”in

to
m am”. no
‘50
.‘IUIIIII‘.
m mm
m

to

no

man“:

a»
Wt.
a. sum

W.
mouth...
at
m
mum:
m1”; m.
3W
”n
Hummu‘ut
mummy.“ mam
mm)...
Im

mum. mums-mm

m“.

�«uh»

am
”mm. mm

W
It
a.
mm

”(am
in mint”
an
with

an

approval.

by

m

I“ Wm. I'll mm (m twang
of
tho
«3:aura
“and m an a m
and
smut-tum
"can
to
un”. “any a“
mum
10'
11’
”MI-t!
H
MIN».
m
m.
“W‘- m.
manual.

01'

,0”th

“W
«mm»
up
mun-0mm wm‘mmrm

Win
m.mmmmutmmmmaumw
mm “mm mm tum.
an
My

Wu
ammo!
my
M1:

�mm.»

mm mm” Wm. ma.

u» 75
mutant. “than.
M

809

1.)

mun.“ NCMMaunm”

mun-hum. :amutmm,mmumn-

mmummumu-Mnmgmnunw
urn“ «on. at loan mm
a

tram“.

A

n.

punt:
a
m

m
ﬂWmﬂ.’
mu!"
My
«w
10”
m. mimmmuuwummmrtmm
(M10 1).

m

a

an

an
m rm

can can» at

nub-M

MW,

31

mm‘u'm.
mun-u
can",
mmmmun

mmmtmmmmmcm.
Mmunumummmmmmm
m,

mmunmuuﬂimm£ﬂmmmum

«moulmmmmmn‘m.

luv-awn

"moutammommmmm
«m (“an ”unwindmjlmmﬁMMnuc
arm.

sumac“- a:

.W
”1.1th

’

m

”mum mm m: ”"1qu m

m.mumnumum
twimmmmladumlmh Mm“
tutu-nonhuman...

�~6-

m

m
«and. “mum. mm mum.
muzm
man“! u a. mum“
mun.
m
“to
mu!“
«man.
m.
m
Wm
and

m

W
«um. W a mwnm
MW! mom-cu «Mum.

hunt“: a

m

naut- m:

am {m nun
madam-awn.

3-

u mzmcux 9mm. in "an“
clan-um
with“
‘mum
a
man"
m
”unsung. nth-uh m. m a manually umuu‘
an.
1mm" a damn. maﬁa him no» «upta!” an than mm ”min“. a.
an mint!”
It“ my.“ to “a mm. It a. Mutual mm»
sh
1).
(mu
I. mum a
m “noun“ a»
15
:1
: «mu Mutual W13, Wm m can a:
“cu-"um
Mmcuonhm
untoti!
it“
m
mitt” mu.Wt!
unhamm mun 1W. m. m m “C (“.1 ma)

W

M
m: m

m\mum.

m

(u.h)vmmmzcmmnumsuu
“lam

(9.2m)mlmtmmttwmm1muum
(mu

1).

can a M m

-.................

Inuit“ M hum“ Inna”
At “a
an hr no Mu!
to
of
«a mum ”an“ m 1m
nun"

«am
W.

Wt.

”at.

�-7roaovurud, Inch xnyrcvcd, anyrnvué or unimpravod. 2h.
tunidou#u a: roauvorod and tuck suyrovud :ntaugu It. a1;ntltc:ntly

rttusni ‘roup (2‘31. 3). _81: pnt1¢ntu, ‘11 in ‘hu
uncapﬁtnnt grin», war. ratod a. r¢iivttlda 2h; Inaptt‘l $13»
luwnr in tpu

ghargas curt guru clonal: unnaaintid with rttunnl 0r ataecnu

tinn:tstn ct truaﬁntut 1: ﬁt: tif‘lﬂl gran».
,

tibia

3

about hora

”oaanwnochoou In”- a-

�o.-

W:man um «an»

m.

mm ”cum
(8.13.13)
1:
mn mm
mus-nu m was“
at «cm tum w W mum“: swans/u in m
«MCI hr at In,” ‘0 ”am“: What. It
«no»: «o W” a» u a Wumanm
man: ”an” no "in. man" than M“ m
01ml: mu. m m "an 1- mm»: and am»
nu

and

‘

tun Chou n. :9: «mm In «4 WM nu- main"

Mm.

"jmmrmummmmum
tuning!
In:
a
an
mm“ “am.
«mm m
:3
at
many“.
WV
“Wm:
W
W
am...
m nunu' mun: run-u am»:
“an“...
it“ mum. Wot, Wham: at um
“Wumumrmmomummlm.
_

3

a
or

Mmmﬁdthntmtmumuth
only
a:
no
«m
m
«mm. am (”my ”MW
nu haul mm to» «awn rnn m mum. (that
:11 than
Mun-010.
11

tar
to”
am» an.“ union.
a. mum. must). maul for main”

gnu-ut-

3W m

W

with.“ m an at“: «comm an ”on.” at
hat. my tutu-hm a. M It 0mm in: the inﬂux.
«tar
making.
a
I:
oats-uh
apnea”
m
mm ”mm. at m «apt-nu M m Mm“ ta

W

�.,.
o-t
for
mun!” “arm unman- Willi."

W.
immune «am.
«mm "sun“
a mum: ”about! mm W “and“
”an” m “uni“
Md trams
In“ «m that «um run want. it“ mun-mu
cum on tonal in “ms my an an
”can“:
rip-ﬂout
m
man.
a
am.
than to

in

that
to

0,9,16,17,31).

by ham

nutty

as:

in
part

or

«If

and

at

tnn
um
In»
em
nun“
m,
um“- tram”:

m:

a:
at:
pint“:
mu
u
mm
_muauy '1» m1: mm pun-m u ﬁrm-pond
a» mum: of pun-Wm m Mm to tutu.
at um am." (9):
3
c:
“up“
m
n
an:
mania;
m
imam
103
an
WC
”In.
m1” ”um
My
W1”
Morn). In Win than” m m It“. On nut”,
1: What for am). ”an mu- 1». but
mull
«a
tun-tum
mu». an mm m wan-tum «mu
magma «at «mm m 0W1" than” «3
and
it an m ”lam:
”nut
mm“. 1mon
a» £01m m,
«rattan.- an Main,
“158., I: 1 an aim am WM‘ :‘u um um man
an luv. u. mum".
than
mania-1:
nun".
why In” ion in
in
mam: 9mm.” pm mm:
“noun, mu u“
Mm mun

ﬂ.“ ”amino

m:
W

mt

um

m
m
mm
Mu$uumtumnhtumumssttmldh

M11.

�«~10!-

Pnrhapa

yntitnﬂ

It

Into important than atthgr tiiitada or tun

the

partltttrint

in in» (tutor ct conuiltonuy

a: attitudou. _Klavuau g§_g;.. (17) hit. rayur‘id thtt yuuus
rOltdtlﬁ puynhtttrtltl wi‘h yuywhcunnlrttannrzinﬂation.
£r¢q303ilr hurt IBIBVIrthl. ttiiiudtu tuunrd :cnntto tiarapy
tud at: unhtvultn‘ dbauﬁ proucrihtn: such trtn‘uint. In tn:
patient study that. Hurt Ina: indiou‘tonu ﬁhnt rotcrrnl tor
tonvu1t$v3 tiara»: In: not ‘3. irao"ahotaa at the r¢n1dout
phynactnu but in. and. gnlr.tt‘cr conaidwrublo prasuurc by
:éutntuﬁruttvu and nursing ptrnonuul.
A raetut atndy hr 1.31:: and Lntuavtta (15) a: uﬁatt‘
‘36 ﬁuvironasnttl tna£ura I‘lﬁtiﬂﬁcd with rut-tral for drug
iburuyy 1: thin hmupltal doncmaﬁrntnd 1ht$ ti. pnyuhtiﬁrtlt's
tolurnntc {at dilﬁurhod buhavior nun ﬁlth htthﬂr tbs: thu‘ a:
unrsau gal athor pornonnal. Iroquautzr $ho rasidont pirttutun
placid : prontuu an htlpiu¢ tum patAnnt nadir: hit uninviur
without rciart ta InimittIGrtyr. L ttnilcr ahltrvttton wt.
and. by aubthaa and lanai (21) gun by xlawaau (17) ch. fauna

an 'p-mmtruu was“;

:-

mums

nu mummy.”

tutu unusually rcluatnut to ada awn; shmrnpr'. Such ;tt1tuIOI
:11 ha away-:Id ta F‘ﬁiiﬂtl cashor ovurtly If sartrtly. aneh
ahanrvlﬁtomn rntntnrat tbs tiadtnas w: Pnannnnlck. 91u1$: and
Litiln (18) that ‘duaptso prostticisanu by clsnlaina; thtt
that: maturtsco 1n tinny: til tndtvidunl pnﬁitut. clanaatnnl,
t; tact at; b. I. crawl: nannitﬁad in a pnr‘taulnr psywhtntrio

�«v11.»

rental at $halnht, thu‘ tbs pl‘SOQt'o «instant: tad troutucnt an Itrguly prudotorntn¢d.‘
2h. 'tnltut hat. would nuggnnt that tn. paychtntrstt'u
3:51thtat attitudo Qoward ‘rantnout 10 not . caunrul n‘titado
but. :- "um to th- ‘uew. dunno" a: tu ”no“ u

hinuult. 1h. pnyuhtn$tgc roatdant Iroquuutlr ha: 1:1: dittitulty
.1: newt-gang Imumtwy tu- n In“ «In: M that. It“
in tudoalatvo than at sing: it ﬂlkiil 3 51-31.: trustncnt
roturral £0? a putiant who 1. cultnrtlxr unr- 1130 hxnuult.
1h. finding: taut ub3n¢£oru to cauvnlnlvt titrnpy sure
gown otttn ditchnrgod tron in. h¢0p1¢I1 g. clintg‘lzy untupruvga 1n countltou‘ with privioul thnarvnﬁloul (1). ccwdou
(7) eluutttcc objector: int. tun untoxorioo . pcorly orxau‘cd
c‘tatunte nubjoctu who uttarod raatatunao to it. tra:tn¢nt
tud rucpaniud wi‘h elintanl ll,fﬂ?lﬂiu%3 lad a tottor ariastoi
group vb. dbjcetnd $0 troutnont on ta uftt‘udtanl hula:
e131u$u¢ §hu7 '1’. ‘not in lﬁbd it than“. Ibis lttinr group

rutrtctnry to £30 Glitteal bnncltta at tho tr0&amp;ﬁuont.
Alntc‘ :11 at the patient: in thc rnrtlnl urcnp of tha prtuuut
t‘udy ecnld ho alcnaittud tn :5. l‘tior crimp.
n. in “mug ﬁhﬁ wu$ .1 tin nation“ who to!!!“
ccnvulaivu traninult v.9. praguou‘ﬁoally pour acluatsut It!
eonvnlulvu tr::iu¢nt. In yrtvio‘l-utndaol (2.10.11) v. hnvo
than: this tho incident. at ruttugs a! 1nprovuucu$ :t
dilthnrg. in runn3, vulluoducutnd, luv 3 0:01. pattuats van
wort

l

�smut-mu:

1.“
ma
m
In»,
u
«and.
mm

tu-nmmumdmy
aWnuu-u.
of
for
'mn‘

”an”
m WMSmmMmmpmsnuuun‘
Wu
plant: m «0 mm

at 9mm.
mm
«My
«I
In
mu mm: m1” Mm u «u
nu
in 1m: max: round 1mm a.

main

”u

ma. a» "051m “mm It“ amt!“ W ”and.”
at
m...
u m m mun. m mum:
u
but.”

m:
amomunumcmumxum

w.
muxmm

«am» a! punt-m: mm. m mm an: a:
In

3.70.1..th Win-It W his «1mm-

». 3m macaw an «man u .mm.

’

'

�m:u

m

at a

mum immun- a

:4»:me

trauma

W.

m

‘

"nun

u wanna train»
“My
“I
nutnmhﬁqlul
it“
m
mm
um
to
at
at
m
h
"in“
“at
ammu» “an”
75
at
m
mulls"
1mm“
mm
"1W7 ”um mm a: ”mun" that” "(not
wan-nu mm a m in: mm x: a pmmWth-r
«mm mums“.
Ma nun“, m mu. hm» mm m m
1
um um- ” u- «mm In“ m: ﬂu m an
0:
no
lmhuml
«mm mun"- Mm._
”who“ m “m! u m
m
u
”nun
m.
n» mm
alumni u nun-m.
m. m
ht «mum a mom... a: mantra mm 1:
of
attitudinI.
“an!“ m 1m“
”3mm.
W
and
by
“but m ”in“ law.
at

‘

th-

m

mu

m
m

um

‘

�um:
Inn: 13:. lingaﬁaau
Asttptanaa
ﬁctuaul

t!

to.)

13

19.1

II¢I ﬁlttlralu.
(ﬂunuinalnd

3 M)

p

‘10.!

:.s
'

and

«‘1

I’aonr:

¢
.

Ur Irony

11.6
13.7

83.1
37.1

8.:

«10.9

1.9

1.2

am

.015

�ﬁll-III

3mm» nag-nu h In“

3m
Wm Imam:
tutu-not

W

1

um

a

(151)

(R6)

13

t (m)

h

15

I: It“; ,
"‘

"'

‘1...

(w)

(an

15

o

(M)
(o)

�1’ " ‘*‘13

P

"‘

~05

�1.
“1-,.

a.
3.
‘0

5.

6.

nu, I"

.“um. ‘ﬁ’.
mm. 3-1..

m0, M! m,

M‘;

‘95,.

W13
My
.W.

ﬂ“.mg 3.:

”M,
1.3.“:
m “on,
3:30;

at um, la

1.3.1”; 1m;
m.
3.1.,
mm, 1., hum“.

W,

".1

11‘

£0.15,

mm»

Wu
m.

W.

.inﬁp

1’5“;

m‘g 'o't,‘fog

W

mm, 1.3.. on... 3.3..

2.:
am.
um
1950.
551.6“.
3;
3.3. m an», x... can
mm, 3.3.,
cam-paramount). ¢Wmiﬁit a: ”an” m
“on ”hum he ”nun”. ars-inn. 1:: Wk“.
’03.. N “am. ’0'. (“'o). m
'.g
.

m,

:-

..

0mm m...

W;3;!”

“‘13 6h.

m,
1.8.:
am.

’¢

m;

16.

Mg

1”.

wax:
m;

30,-;

'05.;

up”:

1939.

’5'. C“ In“. ‘o'cl

3‘1!

1”:

m. a:

W”
8.9"

M m, '0!

'0’
M
"1“.»
"“
m;

m. m 1,5,.

M

in. ma-

‘G'I.

In“, ‘0'. I“
Shh)“. 1!“.

7

4

*

*

W4,

g.
m.

�at.
11.

m,

3.3...

hawk.

It.

10 816, 195?.

nu.

m m, 3.:

m
.

Wm.

w.
M.

an run, In
,1:
“S.
to”.
mm...
2.2;...
'11.:
In...
«a
I.
«mot,
rug.
1!“.
m: I”,
3.3.: Mm. at can mum»
mm. a. «a
1.1...

hunk.

m
mu,“can a train“ «W.

ma
m.
mm.
Km.
and

u.‘

17.

1..
1!.

3;.

n
0.33.! "at: “um“, twain-nun and m
must.
mcmwummm
hm.

W”

um, um.
mm... 3.3.:
111,
m:
an.” 19“.
a.
1..
1.:
m
mm,
mu.
Wk,

tam-u. 5.3.;

m:

I...

1".- 1,5,.
woman, n. on mu. 3.»...

w.
W,

m..
“W.
IO.
1.1.
was... m kn. Ian
”5‘38’j 1,5‘0
m”...
a. mm
mu»
3”.

'

In.

1:!

m,

1’s‘a

I.

and

M...

m:

g:

“WW

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2854">
                <text>Sociopsychological characteristics of patients who refuse convulsive therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1961 Feb; 132:153-7.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2855">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2856">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-54-020</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2857">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2858">
                <text>Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2859">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2860">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2861">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Vol. 132, N0. 2 February, 1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2862">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2863">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74488">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81049">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87610">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94171">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="237" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="28">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/7defb938ce2262c49752d69a21de6f6d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5a753824ca2576c05cbbf0c478051e0c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100654">
                    <text>Spinal Fluid Findings
Following Cerebral Angiography
Joseph, M. Stein, M.D. and Max Fink, M.D.

WITH increasing use of cerebral angiography, the problem arose as to Whether

the procedure, of itself, produced changes in the cerebrospinal ﬂuid. Forty—
eight hours after angiography a spinal ﬂuid examination in a patient suspected
of a brain tumor revealed a cloudy ﬂuid with 3,000 white blood cells per
cu. mm. Prior to angiography the ﬂuid had been clear, colorless and without
any cells. As, no information concerning the relationship of pleocytosis to
angiography was available, it was decided to study the changes in the spinal
ﬂuid by the usual clinical methods.
Spinal ﬂuids from 21 patients were examined prior to and following angiography. Lumbar punctures prior to angiography were done at various intervals, but all punctures following angiography were performed between 12
and 24 hours after the procedure. In each instance the spinal ﬂuid was exam—
ined for color, cell count and total protein content.
All angiograms were percutaneous, using 35 per cent Diodrast as the contrast medium. Maximal Diodrast volume was 70 ml. at one procedure. While
the majority of patients were subjected to unilateral carotid punctures, bi—
lateral punctures were done in four, and combined bilateral carotid and ver—
tebral punctures in one patient. Either intravenous Pentothal (14 cases) or
local procaine (seven cases) anesthesia was used.
RESULTS

Of the 21 subjects, significant changes in the spinal ﬂuid following angiography were seen in only two cases. In one, a patient with a cerebral an—
giomatous malformation and multiple aneurysms, 5,000 red blood cells per
cu. mm. were seen in a pink spinal ﬂuid. In the second, a patient with a
chromophobe adenoma of the pituitary gland, the protein content of the spinal
ﬂuid changed from 89 to 151 mg. per cent; also, seven lymphocytes per cu. mm.
were recorded when previously there had been none.
In all other subjects, changes in color, protein content and cell count were
not signiﬁcant. Three subjects showed transient hemiparesis following an—
From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of Medicine and the neurologic service (third division) and psychiatric division, Bellevue Hospital, New York City.
Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol. 3, No. 2

137

�NE UROLOGY

138

giography, and in none of these were there signiﬁcant changes in the spinal
ﬂuid. Since Diodrast can cause changes in membrane permeability,1 and the
spinal ﬂuid reﬂects such changes, it could be postulated that a relationship
between complications following angiography and changes in the spinal ﬂuid
might exist. Such changes were not demonstrated in the present cases. F urther investigations with more exacting techniques for protein determination
and protein differentiation are indicated.
CONCLUﬁONS

Neither a marked pleocytosis nor a marked increase in protein content of
the spinal ﬂuid are usual concomitants of Diodrast angiography. It may be
concluded that when such spinal ﬂuid changes are found they are unrelated
to the procedure.
REFERENCE
1. OLSSON,

0.: Cerebral angiography: Toler-

ance for contrast media of diodrast type,

J. Neurol., Neurosurg.,
1949.

6c

Psych, 12:312,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2364">
                <text>Spinal fluid findings following cerebral angiography. Neurology. 1953 Feb; 3(2): 137-8.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2365">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2366">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-10-014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2367">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2368">
                <text>Stein, Joseph M.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2369">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2370">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2371">
                <text>Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol.3, No.2</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2372">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2373">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74439">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81000">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87561">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94122">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="241" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="32">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/ec4cf1a3f19d135cdae9a13c9adf5bf5.pdf</src>
        <authentication>067f3d4f0480ecc6b50bb9561e8d4277</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100658">
                    <text>Standardization of the
Face-Hand Test
Martin

A. Green, M.D.

and Max Fin/z, M.D.

the face-hand test, has been introduced in previous studies and the responses of normal subjects and of patients with
psychiatric disorders described in detail?“ The test consists of applying touch
or pinprick stimuli simultaneously to the face and hand while the subject’s
eyes are closed. The subject is then asked to describe and to localize the
percepts. Two general types of responses occur. The two stimuli may be perceived and localized correctly, or the subject may perceive only one stimulus
and either not perceive the other (phenomenon of extinction) or mislocalize
the second stimulus (phenomenon of displacement).7 Most often the mis—
localization or displacement occurs to another part of the subject’s body, but
occasionally there is displacement into extrapersonal space or onto the examiner (exosomesthesia).R Displacement of stimuli across the midline of the
body (allesthesia) may also occur.”
Normal adults show errors in perception on the initial trials of the facehand test. Characteristically these errors consist of extinction of the stimulus
to the hand whereas the face stimulus is perceived correctly (phenomenon
of face dominance). As tests are repeated the errors disappear so that by the
tenth trial nearly all subjects correctly perceive both stimuli and then continue to be correct on subsequent trials. This type of response has been termed
a “negative face-hand test.” It occurs not only with normal adults but also in
patients with schizophrenia, depression, or severe anxiety.
In contrast, patients with an organic mental syndrome show extinction and
displacement after ten trials of testing or as long as testing is continued. Such
a response is termed a “positive face-hand test.” A “positive face-hand test”
is also manifested by normal children, normal aged
persons, and mental
defectives.
Because of the differential response of these several groups of subjects, the
face-hand test has become useful clinically in detecting the presence of organic
brain disease. During the course of our studies, however, it has been noted
that patients with an organic mental syndrome vary greatly in the type and
A SIMPLE PERCEPTUAL TEST,

From the department of neurology of the
Mount Sinai Hospital and the Hillside Hos—
pital, New York City.

This work was aided in part by fellowships
from the United States Public Health Serv—
ice (Dr. Green) and the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (Dr. Fink).

Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, March 1954, Vol. 4, No. 3

211

�NEUROLOGY

21:2

frequency of perceptual errors. Also, subjects without organic brain disease
occasionally manifest a positive face—hand test. The questions which arise
from these observations are: 1) Is it possible to classify or standardize the
different types of errors occurring in subjects with a positive face-hand test?
2) Is there a correlation between the types of responses and different groups
of subjects? 3) Is there a type of response which can be said to occur only
in patients with severe disease of the brain? The present study is an attempt
to answer these questions.
IVIETHOD AND RESULTS

Previous records of the face-hand test were reviewed for almost 1,000 patients with organic mental syndrome, normal adults, and schizophrenic adults,
as well as lesser numbers of normal children, normal aged persons, and sub—
jects with mental deﬁciency, depression, and severe anxiety. Additional groups
of some of these subjects were also tested in a systematic manner with dif—
ferent types of stimuli. The criteria used to formulate a standardization of
the face—hand test were: 1) type of perceptual error; 2) frequency of various
errors with different stimuli (touch, rubbing or scratching, and pinprick);
3) effect on the frequency of errors when the subject observes the application
of stimuli (factor of attention). Fifteen to 30 trials of the test were usually
done for each subject.
TABLE

1

FEATURES OF POSITIVE FACE-HAND TESTS
(Persistent errors after 10th trial)
One—plus

Extinction
only with
touch stimuli.

Two-plus
Extinction
with touch,
rubbing, and
pinprick stimuli.
Occasional dis—
placement with
touch stimuli.

Three-plus
Extinction and
displacement
with touch, rubbing, and pinprick
stimuli.

F our—plus
Same as three-plus with at least
one of the following features:
a) exosomesthesia,
b) allesthesia,
C) frequent perseveration,
d) occurrence of errors while
subject watches the stimuli

being applied.

Based on these criteria, it was possible to divide patients showing a posi—
tive face-hand test into four groups. The characteristic responses for each
group are summarized in table 1. These responses with examples are described more fully in the following paragraphs.
One-plus face-hand test: Subjects in this group show errors only of extinction and not of displacement. These errors occur only with touch stimuli.
When pinprick is used, both stimuli are perceived correctly, although errors
will again appear when touch stimuli are reintroduced.

Case 1.—A 64 year old man with mild diabetes was admitted with a history of difficulty in walking for the previous year and a half. For at least the same period of time
he had been depressed, slept and ate poorly, and was impotent. The only neurologic ﬁnding was a slow, hesitant, shufﬂing gait. There was no evidence of peripheral vascular disease. The patient appeared depressed, showed psychomotor retardation, and cried readily.
The sensorium was intact. Spinal fluid, electroencephalogram, and roentgenograms of

�STANDARDIZATION OF FACE—HAND TEST

213

the spine were normal. The diagnosis was involutional psychosis, depressed type. The
gait difﬁculties were thought to be secondary to the depression.
This patient showed a one-plus response on the face-hand test. A sample of his

responses follows:

Stimulus
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
touch
touch

Location

right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—left cheek
right hand—left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek-right hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand

Response
right cheek
left cheek
right cheek
left cheek
correct
correct
right cheek
correct
correct
right cheek
left cheek
correct
correct
correct
correct
correct
left cheek

Type of error
extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction

extinction

Comment: Although this type of response occurs in patients with cerebral
disease, it is not always characteristic for this group. It is also observed in
patients with depression, as this case illustrates, and may occur in anxiety
states, schizophrenia, and, occasionally, in normal adults.
T wo-plus face—hand test: In this group extinction occurs with pinprick
and rubbing stimuli as well as with touch stimuli. These errors may be just
as frequent with both types of stimuli or may be more conspicuous with touch
than with pinprick or rubbing. Displacement is not present, as a rule, but
may occur on an occasional trial.
Case 2.—A 72 year old man had a ﬁve week history of mental and behavioral changes.
These consisted of disorientation, confused behavior, and intermittent mutism. Examination showed an organic mental syndrome characterized by partial disorientation, defects in
recent memory, evasions and circumlocutions in answering questions, denial of illness, and
pain asymbolia. There were no other neurologic disabilities. The spinal ﬂuid, electroencephalogram, and skull roentgenograms were normal. A pneumoencephalogram showed
an increased amount of air over the cerebrum and increase in the size of the ventricles.
This patient’s responses on the face-hand test characterize the two-plus type of response. A sample of these responses follows:
Stimulus
Location
Response
Type of error
touch
left cheek—right hand
left cheek
extinction
touch
extinction
right cheek—left hand
right cheek
left cheek—left hand
touch
left cheek
extinction
touch
extinction
right cheek—right hand
right cheek
touch
correct
right cheek—left cheek
touch
correct
right hand—left hand
touch
extinction
right cheek
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
left cheek
extinction
pinprick

�214

NE UROLOGY

Stimulus

pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick

Location.

right cheek—left hand
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—right hand

Response
correct
left cheek
right cheek
left cheek

Type of error
extinction
extinction
extinction

Comment: This response occurs most often in patients with cerebral dis—
ease, although occasionally patients with anxiety states, depression, or schizophrenia may also exhibit it. It is not seen in normal adults.
Three-plus face-hand test: This group is characterized by the occurrence
of displacement as well as extinction with both touch and pinprick stimuli.
The frequency of extinction and displacement may be equal or unequal and,
likewise, the number of errors with touch and pinprick will be variable.
Case 8.——A 57 year old chronic alcoholic was found in the street in a stuporous condition. His breath had an alcoholic odor and there was a laceration over his right forehead.
There were no focal neurologic signs. During the ﬁrst hospital day the patient gradually
became fully conscious. Speech was rambling and at times almost incoherent. He was
completely disoriented and had severe memory defects with confabulation. He expressed
paranoid ideas and was hostile and assaultive. There were no hallucinations. Spinal ﬂuid
and skull roentgenograms were normal. The diagnosis was acute and chronic alcoholism
with deterioration.
A sample of this patient’s
responses on the face-hand test, indicative of a three-plus
response, follows:

Stimulus
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick

Location
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek-right hand
left cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek-left hand
right hand—left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand

Response

right cheek-left cheek
right hand—left hand
right cheek
correct
left cheek
right cheek—left cheek
correct

right cheek—left cheek
left cheek—right cheek
right cheek
'

left cheek

Type of error
displacement
displacement
extinction
extinction
displacement

displacement
displacement
extinction
extinction

Four-plus face-hand test: This group shows the most severe perceptual
errors. In addition to frequent extinction and displacement, as seen in the
three—plus group, one or all of the following phenomena may be seen with
touch and pinprick stimuli: l) exosomesthesia; 2) allesthesia; 3) frequent
perseveration of responses; 4) occurrence of perceptual errors even while the
subject keeps his eyes open and sees the areas stimulated.
Case 4.—A 60 year old man had a three year history of disorientation, forgetfulness,
and loss of interest. On examination he showed a severe organic mental syndrome manifested by complete disorientation, marked memory defects, and inability to calculate. He
was alert and cooperative. There were no other neurologic signs. Spinal ﬂuid and skull
roentgenograms were normal. The electroencephalogram showed moderate, diffuse, bisynchronous slowing with slow alpha. A pneumoencephalogram disclosed abnormal increased amounts of air in the subarachnoid spaces overlying the cerebral cortex.
A sample of the patient’s responses, indicating a four-plus face-hand test, follows:

�STANDARDIZATION OF FACE-HAND TEST
Stimulus
touch
touch

Location

right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand

touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick
pinprick

right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand
right hand-left hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—left hand
left cheek—right hand
right cheek—right hand
left cheek—left hand

pinprick
( eyes open )

right cheek—left hand

Response
right cheek
left cheek—
extrapersonal space
right cheek
right cheek
correct
right cheek—left cheek
left cheek—left hand
right cheek—left cheek
left cheek
right cheek
left cheek—
extrapersonal space

right cheek—

215
Type of error
extinction
exosomesthesia
extinction
perseveration

displacement
allesthesia
displacement
extinction
extinction
exosomesthesia
exosomesthesia

extrapersonal space

Comment: Three-plus and four-plus responses invariably indicate disease
of the brain. They are never found in normal adults or in patients with psychogenic disorders.
These responses have been occasionally seen, however, in normal children
under the age of six,4 aged persons without manifest disease of the brain,6
and mental defectives.10 The distribution of responses of children and aged
persons are related mainly to age. The youngest children and the oldest adults
show three-plus and four-plus responses. With changes in age away from
these extremes, one-plus and two-plus responses become more frequent. Of
the subjects with mental deﬁciency, those with the lowest mental age have
three-plus and four-plus responses, while one-plus and two-plus responses
predominate in subjects with higher mental ages.
Table 2 summarizes the distribution of the four different types of responses among the various groups of subjects. Only patients with an organic
mental syndrome show three-plus and four-plus responses. Such responses
may be considered diagnostic of an organic mental syndrome.
DISCUSSION

In answer to the questions raised at the outset of this paper, our results
indicate that four general types of positive face-hand tests occur and that
TABLE 2
PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY OF ONE-PLUS TO FOUR-PLUS POSITIVE FACE—HAND TEST
IN DIFFERENT GROUPS OF SUBJECTS ‘

.............
...................
Patients with anxiety states
.............
Organic mental syndrome
Normal adults (below 60 years of age)
Schizophrenic adults

Patients with psychogenic depression
(all age groups included)

.

.

.

.............

.

Negative
F-H test

Oneplus

10
99

7

nearly
all

occasional
occasional

70

22

all

nearly

l

Twoplus
25
0

Three-

plus
33
O

F ourplus
25
0

rare

never

never

rare

never

never

0

0

8

�216

NEUROLOGY

these types can be correlated with different groups of subjects (table 2).
Our attention was focused mainly on whether there was a type of response
which occurred only in patients with severe disease of the brain. All adult
subjects with a three-plus or four-plus response have organic brain disease.
Such responses are never seen in normal subjects or patients with psycho—
genic disorders, even though these groups may occasionally Show one-plus
or two-plus responses.
Patients with cerebral disease manifesting a four-plus response invariably
show the severest or most advanced form of mental changes. Otherwise there
is no good correlation between the type of positive face-hand test and the
severity of sensorial defects. Some patients with severe mental changes may
have only a two—plus response. In addition, 10 per cent of patients with an
organic mental syndrome have a negative face-hand test. It is realized that
the use of a one to four—plus nomenclature for the groups implies an increasof
because
used
This
nomenclature
of
cerebral
was
dysfunction.
degree
ing
convenience and such an implication is not intended.
This classiﬁcation of a positive face-hand test should be useful clinically.
In testing neurologic patients, the exact type of positive face—hand test should
be recorded, rather than the designation “the face-hand test was positive”
as has been done until now. Such a procedure will make it easier to judge
whether the type of positive face-hand test indicates deﬁnite cerebral disease
or whether it may be a manifestation of anxiety or depression. The use of
such a classiﬁcation will also make it easier to compare the response of patients at different times during their illness. In addition, it is valuable in clinical experimental work, for it has been applied in studies of the effects of drugs
on perception and the responses of patients to electroshock treatment. In
such studies alteration in perception can be measured by observing the duration and incidence of the variety of positive face-hand tests during the periods
of testing.
SUMMARY

A standardization of the face-hand test is presented. A positive face-hand
test is designated as one in which errors persist after the tenth trial. Four
classes of positive face-hand tests are recorded. A one-plus face-hand test
consists of extinction only with touch stimuli. A two-plus response is char-

acterized by extinction with pinprick and rubbing stimuli, as well as with
touch stimuli. A three—plus response consists of extinction and displacement
with touch, rubbing, and pinprick stimuli. A four-plus response has all the
characteristics of a three-plus response and in addition at least one of the
following features: a) exosomesthesia; b) allesthesia; c) perseveration of
observes
while
the
of
(1)
applicasubject
even
errors
occurrence
responses;
tion of the stimuli. Three-plus and four-plus responses invariably indicate
disease of the brain in subjects over the age of six years. One-plus and twoplus responses occur in patients with brain disease but are also manifested
disorders.
with
adults
and
of
normal
number
small
psychogenic
patients
a
by

�STANDARDIZATION OF FACE-HAND TEST

217

Patients with a four-plus response show the severest mental changes but the
converse is not true. There is no correlation between the severity of the mental
changes and the type of positive face-hand test manifested. Usefulness of this
classiﬁcation in the study of patients clinically and in experimental work is
suggested.
REFERENCES
1. BENDEn, M. B., FINK, M.,

and GREEN, M.:
Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of
face and hand, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 66:
355, 1951.
[O
. BENDER, M. B., and FINK,
M.: Tactile per—
ceptual tests in the differential diagnosis of
psychiatric disorders, J. Hillside Hosp. 1:21,
1952.
. FINK, M., GREEN, M., and BENDER, M. B.: The
face-hand test as diagnostic sign of disease of
the brain, Neurology 2:46, 1952.
. FINK, M., and BENDER, M. B.:
Development
of perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli in
normal children, Neurology 3:27, 1953.
. IAFFE, J., and BENDER, M. B.: Perceptual patterns following general anesthesia, ]. Neurol.,
Neurosurg. 81 Psychiat. 14:316, 1951.
6. GREEN, M. A., and BENDER, M. B.: Cutaneous

perception in the aged, Arch. Neurol. 6: Psychiat. 69:577, 1953.
The phenomenon of sensory
. BENDER, M. B.:
displacement, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 65:
607, 1951.
. SHAPIRO, M. F., FINK, M., and BENDER, M. B.:
Exosomesthesia or displacement of cutaneous
sensation into extrapersonal space, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 68:481, 1952.
9. BENDER, M. B., and NATHANSON, M.: Patterns
in allesthesia and their relation to disorder of
body scheme and other sensory phenomena,
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 64:501, 1952.
10. FINK, M., GREEN, M. A., and BENDER, M. B.:
Perception of simultaneous stimuli by mentally
defective subjects, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 117:
43, 1953.

�EIWRDIZATION

OF

m FAGEwm MT

3y

“mm

I.

‘0 “NC“,

Do

und

In: rank. n. n.

ibis tort 1;:

e
status Publia Hoalth
dation of
n‘%

'

_ﬁ{

p
9'» 1 arson) and
survioo (Br.
thy Huttonnl
‘

&lt;"

'

’

'

”

Faun-

Infantila Paralysis (Dr. Pink).
Eran an. Dognvunont or Hourology at thn noun: stnui Hospital
and tho 311

lid.

Houpitnl.

�Introduetiunt
In priviaul studies a tinplo poro‘ptuﬁl taut, uh. rnoia
hnnd ﬁast. was intradnoed and tha rbnﬁonnon bf normal anbjtetn
1nd or pationta with ptyohittrio d1noranrl w¢r¢ dglcribod 1n
dbttil (lab). Tho tout aanniuta or applying tough or pinpriok
.ltinnli nimnltnnsounly to tha tact und.hund uhilo the aubjuot‘n
ayes hr. closed. it. lubjoot in than aambd to annariba and to
lootliso thn poraapta. Two gannrul type: or roaponsol Gaunt.
who ﬁve stimuli may bu poreoivod and localized oorruotly. 0r,
thn nubjoae may piranivo only on. atiuulus and cithor*nat porn
enivo the oﬁhtr (phnnennnan at astinotian) or maniacaliaa thn
sooand stimulus (phannmnnon or diuplacaannt) (7). ﬁaét ottcn
~ﬁh¢ mislaealiuntién or diaplaéqnnnt «can»! to anathnr pirt at
tho wubjoot’s body, but oooailunally thtrn 1n dilplaaahont into
oxtrtparuonnl apnea or onto thy axmnxncr‘(axoaamolthnaia) (8).
Diﬁplgotnoht at stimuli turns: the midlino or thn body ($110.»
thosln) nu: also onenr (9).
ﬂornnl adult: show 0r§oru 1n perception.au tbs initinl
‘

r

mu.- a:

I

tho tuna-hum

4

«at. cmctcrnuaaxy than error:

sonaiut or oxxznetion of thy thinning to ﬁn; hand than... tho
raga Itimnlna is perceived aorrcotly (phcnamonon at face again,nnuo). A: thn that: arc ropoatad thy error: d£luppoar so thnt
by th. tonth trial nearly :11 subjcctu norraetly paragQﬁa both
stimuli and than oontinnu to bq corruat on tubauqunnt trigll.
This typo or roaponno has bran tonmnd a “nagativo raco~hnnd
tout.“ It ooourn not only with manual adult: but also in pttzontn

�2.

‘vith :6h1uayhruniu, dtproaaion. or savor. anxiety.
Kn contrast to tho proo¢d1ng aubjaats, pa§1nnts w1th tn
uorganio mnntnl nyndrumn aha! qxt1not1on and displnecnant Artur
10¢ tr1a1: or toating ar-II long It touting 1- continued. Such
t npupcnlc~1n‘tpnmnd u ”posit1vu {nonwhind tout." A *poaitivu
ftoo~hnnd tout" 13 claw unnLroutod by normnl uh1ldrtn, normal

ugud,p¢auann. Ind:mantnl dofoat1vol.
Bananas of thy dirforont1a1 rnlpenao of thaao aoviral
swung! at luhjoetl, an. faoo~hnnd test has banana astral ul1n~
toally 1n dataating tho prosoneo or orggn1e brain d1aoAIo.
During the court: or our stud1al, hawovor.,1t ha: boan noted
&gt;that pntiants with 1n grannie nantql syndrann Vtrylgrontly 1n
the type and traquancy or porcoptuul Grrort. Also; nﬁbjactn

I

'

without organ1o brt1n é1aoalo occasionally mnn1t¢at a pauitivc
raccuhnnd test. 1h: quantionn ﬁnish arias from that. abnorvutionn
an: 1) .1: 11'. poneiblo to elmxﬁ or mandamus an. autumn
'typu: or orrafa aouurr1ng 1n'1gbjooti v1th I panit1v§ fteowhnnd
80:12:13) In ﬁbﬁro A oorrulnt1on botuuon thb typca or roqpannol
and dirrorun1_gr¢upa or aub:¢atn?; 3) in than. a typ. or ronponno
Ih1ah can bu ugid to ocaur gal: in pitiﬁntl v1th_nav¢ro 61301:et uh. bra1n? the proncnt Itﬁdy is an uttqipt to ‘nalur than.
questionapv

I.

04
1

d B!

‘

t

lb roviornﬁ our provleus record: gt

‘

1h! tuna-hand

103%

in nlmnat 1000 pat1onta with organic mnntnl syndroma, normal adults, and Inhiaoyhrohia adults. an wall an in longer numdam.

born of normal.ohildrun, normal 130d porlena, and ambient: with

�3.

m.nt:1ld¢rieigncy. dnprnaulon and lottrn anxiuty. Additional
stamp! of menu of than. uubjcotl taro 31-0 toatna in a lyutmm—
gtic mannar'viﬁh ﬁlrtoront typaa of stimuli. The aritoria
ulna to fonmultt. a Itandnrdixntion or the raaouhrnd tout wire;
1) typo of poraoptunl

2) frnQunney of various arrays
(touch, rubbing at nergtehing. and p1n~'

crrnr:

airroront stimuli
prick): 3) offset on thy troguoney or orroru vh¢n tho cubjoet
noes tha appliantion at tho I§1IM11 (taotcr or dttcntien).
Firtaon to thirty tritla at tho tait wuro naually done for
wiﬁh

Onah

cubjoet.

«

criterig,

it in:

possiblo to divida pa §
tianti sharing a positive ftoomhnha tqst into {our group:.
Th» oharaaterintie rouponnu: for etch gréup arc summarized
in Tabla I. 'ThoIoAroapann g with oxnmplo; art angeribad morn
fully in tho {allowing par‘grapha.
Based an.thnUO

Fuataruu a: Ponitzvo~nuac-aana’roatn

_(vors1£tont prrorn attdr 10t§ ﬁriil)

W

1
M."
Situation

Extinction

W

Wm»
1

am
plan

mt1not1on

with tough, und dinpltéo—
anly with
tauah stimuli rubbing. and 'mant with
P181314“
touch, rubbing
stimuli.
,tnd pinpriak
occasionul
stimuli
41: laocmant
Ii tauah

‘

u)oxolamauthsaiu

b)nllaathsai‘

‘

,

nttmuli.

a: thug...

with n:
loaat can or uh.
following {autumn

‘

o)trnquont porn¢v~
«ration
d)qc¢urr¢nen of

errors while

just watch»:

sub~

ithmuli buing
nppliod.

uh?

�h.
gnoePlgn.Fheoen§gd Tout:

Tho

subjects in thia group

that error: only at Ixtinatioh and not at displahanant. Thou.
errata oaour only with tauoh stimuli. Whon pinpriak is usod.
both utinnli up. poruoivoa aornootly, although arrhra will
agnhn appatr lhln touhh stimuli urn rhihtroduaod.
Gun. 1:

tad with

3

A

6h your aid huh with mild dinhotpl pus t6n1ﬁ*

xi your hiltary a! dittiaulty in walking. Fbr at

I... patina 0: than hm had boon dnprogacd, alnpe
.and ht. pearly. and It. impatanﬁ. 'Tho only unurologiaul finding
was t slow, halitant, nhurfllng shit. Thor» was nh ovidnnn:
10am: tho

ot‘poriphortl vuioulhr dis-coo. Eh. pationt‘nppoarud doproiaod,
'IhoVGd payahanotor rotnrdutian, tnd dried handily. The non»
aorium

in: intact. Spinal fluid, slactrocnhaphulogrtm,

ertys at

tho spin. ward normal;

who

tional psychoazu. dopranlod type.
hheught to he sccahdnry to

thi

diagnosis In: involuu

The

gait difficultiau tar.

dnpronhion.

_

this patient thalcd l anonpluaerIpanlﬁ
tout. A sample at his ruxponaaa follows:

on tho tau-«hand

‘

‘

Stimulus gggatiog
touch
right ohnak*lott hand

’

wypg

of

ﬁgugcns;
ﬁrrar
right shook: axeinotion
hoxtinntion
10ft shack

tough

loft chock-right

touah'

right ehaokwright hand right

South

10ft annex—loft hand

touch

right ohhak~lnrt ahock earnest»
aerroet
right handwlott hand
right ohsaknloft hand right dhaok

tauah
touch

and

hand

Int:

chagh
about»

uxtinotioh
cxtinotion

'

extinction

�5.

lart ahnak~r1ght hand
left «human 2mm

tauah
touch
touch

right

man

101“:

pinpriok

pinyrick
pinprl ck
pinprick
touoh&gt;

entrust
eon-cot.

riwt

aha-ehwrigﬁ hand

mud“: hand

right absoknlort-hand
lore dh¢ek»right hand
right nhotkwright hand
1am; ehcokdgft ma‘
right «haiknlgrt hund

wt ”chock-avian: hum

loft

.

~

chock
check

axnination
«attraction

aorrooh

correct
garnet“

«may

‘

aorroot

1st: abut:

.munctxm
ggggggﬁ; Althnugh thia typc or.rcnpanno aoaﬁra in patiwntl

teach

aorabrnl diuaano, 1t 1: not dlway: entruatcvistie for
this group. It is Also abhcrvué‘tn patiunts Iiﬁhéaprolaion,

wiﬁh

:

thlg anal illuitratas}
aehisoﬁhranin, and. ocassiénally,'1n nunnnl a¢ulta;
P; V,Eh.0+H Id ’rt In this graup axtinction ooeurt
Iiﬁh pinpriek nag rubbing stimuli a: lull én‘vith taudh #tim»
all. than; arrora mgy ha junﬁ an froqugnt with baﬁh.typta at
stimuli er may be met. conspiauouj\vith-tauah‘ﬁhnn with pinﬁ
prick or'rubbinga Biapluaunnnt 1; not yrbsnntg an a rule.
and may occur xn anxioty at§t¢t,

an

&amp;

7

L

,

but

may

auour on

Case

1!: '1

tn,aoedligna1 téinls
72

year o;d

man

had a 5

'

.

WIOK

history of

anneal and bahnxioral;ohangoae Eben. ganniatcd ar'éiaor10n~
tatian. confused bdhnviar. and intarldtéant muslin; On oxnmp
inntion thara Inn gn organic mnntql lyndran. charactarisod
by partial dinoriontation. 60:00:: in ruannt unwary, OthianI

�Z~g‘

s7”!

ind otteumloauhlann 1n annu¢r1ng quastians, daninl or 1113..“j
and pain uuynhoiit. Thar. var. no oﬁhor nunrolagioal dilw
mutton. mo spin-.1 mum. olootraonaaphuagm. and “all
xnrnys Ibru ndrmal. A pnauﬁooneaphalognmn unusua'un 1n¢ro.nad
«ﬂaunt of air ovor uh. aorobrum and inaroaaa in tha 3110 at
tha ventricles.
was: pat1¢nt§a raaﬁonloa'on tho tuco-hugd taut untran-

torls.

tho tvaapgul typa at ruaponao.

spannon

taller:

samplc of thnsc raw

A

\

a

‘

3352395;

Tg£;o;t

_“§au¢h

aggntgan
1.x: abnohuright hand

10ft «hack

axﬁinotian

tcudh

right ahaak~1at£ hnnd

right

thinstion

'

3tg55;un

left

r.t§ugna

tbuah V.
tough
touch
toudh

’

right
right
right
right

enaok~1a;m hand

‘”
'

unsurpright hana

din:k-1.ft-ahodk
hundnlurt hand
«hookvlhft hand

lgtt

ahnuk

Oxtlnntinn
right chnub extinction‘
about

«errant
eorruat

'

pinpriek

loft ghostwright hand

right chock wyxtinstian
1.1: chuck oxtinctian

pinpriok
ptnprick
pinpriok
pinprlok

right ahcokalort hand

oorreat

1.x: ehaakwlort ngna
right chant~r1ght hand

lart

'

oxtinutidn
oxtinctian
10ft chick cxtinotion
1¢ft ahhek~right hind
adamant: Thin ruaponaa eocuru mast urban 1n pntianta
with cornbrul 6119110 altheugh oncasianally ptt£¢ntl with
anxigty itibﬂlp dnprossion or duhinophronia naq'alto cxhibit
it. It in not soon in nounnl ndulta.
ahﬂak
right ehnok

�0‘:

75

gaggovgggg §33A~§g§§ ruAtt

IhAA

by thy ooaurrunco of diApLAeanAnt

bath touch

And

pinprick atzmuli.

group

wall

AA

who

And displaoumanm

1A

chArAatAriAAd

Axtinction with
frAquAnoy of extinction
AA

,

any bA’Aqual cr unsquAl And. likAAiAA, Aha
number 0: errors Aibh touch And pinpriak'will bu AArAAbIA.
6139

III:

strict in

the

holia odor
There

AArA

hoapital

ntuporoun oundition.

A

And thArA

AAA

thA pAtiAnt

rumbling And

caaplataly diacriuntod
gnnfahulation.

31A brAAth hAd an Alena

HA

3 lAAArAtion

gradually bAoAAA fully oonaaioun.
At tihnn Alnolt inoohArAnt. EA AAA.

And had AAVArA

salary

axprAAAAd pArAnoid idAAA

and

A3AAA1§1VA._ whArA
Aura

And

Akull X-rAJA

AArA

nanmAl.

Th. diAgnosil

Asamplq of thin pAtiAnt'a
A

tout. indiactivo or
giggyggg

saw.

A

ggaation

my“ dunk-daft hand

.

touch

loft

touch

right

touch

urt chum-hrs hAnd

Quota-wright ham.
'

mamm hum!

touch

right aha-kaloft

uhAARArxsht hAnd
hAnd

loft

hoatilo

III aunt.

fluid
and

taco-hand

fallow-t

right abuzz-

‘

with

EpiuAl

T§£§ogf

333223;;

'

lnft

AAA AAA

rAAponAAA on Ah.

thrAAapluA rauponsa,

touch

dAtAAtA

no hAllueihAtianA.

.Ahronie ALedholium with anteriorAhion.
”

found in

AAA

ovor his right torAhAAd.
no fooAl nnurologieAl signs. During uh. tirut

AAy

SpAAAh WA»

57 yoAr old chrenio Alcdhalio

A

chock

‘

diuplmmnt
.

hand;mm
1cm; hum!

displaemne

right about

anemone»:

came:
lcts aback

extination

right

diaplaeAaont

loft

ahAAk~
ohAAk

�touch

right hand-10ft

pinpriak
;

pinpriak

hand

comet

right ahaok~lort hnnd A)right

left

an:

1m; chﬁokumght hand
I

pinpriak
pinpviek
Fb

'

‘

'

right

chock-«right. hand

lcrt «hank-lnrt‘hnnd
Flu;

Hand

chaokn

diaplaoamant

«bank

cheat»

right ahnek
right ohm:

lﬁtt

;

aback

displaeﬁmnnt
.

oxemauon

axtinutien

‘oat

This greup shown tho aovcrast
poréoptual arrara. In addiiion to rr$quont «xtination lné
ainplaeomnnt, an noon in thn thrno~p1us group, on. or .11 at
ﬁba

folloiing

,

with touah and pinprlak
aﬁimnli: 1) uxunanalthnninx 2) allouthoditi 3) truqnnnt pur~
agvcratian at responlttt h) tho oocurrcnnn or paranptunl arrorn
ngn-uhzid ﬁnd aubjoat kaopu hxl'cytu opan and 109: tht Irilﬂ
ﬁbenamnnn may be mean

ﬂimuntud.
Gas:

60 ycnr old man hgd a

thrai your hiatary or
disoricntution, forgatrulnnla. ‘ndVIOIl of intaraut. an axum~
1n£ti¢u h. ahawqa a 3.1.». argania mantal nyndroun
manirnqttd
by cauploto disaritnt‘tian, marked,m¢mary actuati, and inabilo
ity to atliulato. H. In: alart and cooporteivo. whore wire
no other naurological algal. Spinal fluid gnd akull Xbrnya
XVI

‘uuro manual.

A

EEG-abound

anagruto, diffuse. biaynahranoul

alaning with 110! alpha. A pneumnonnephalogrum discloscd dbnormal increasod amount: of air in th» aubnrachnoid apnea:
overlying the anrobrti eortox.
A Iamplo of tho pationt'u
rnuponuua. indicating a four.
plus tacowhnnd tott, tollavla
’

f

�95

Stimulus.

tough
touah

Typa

.

mastic»:

'

right obnokuloft

hand

19ft chnekhright hand

‘

»

of

Emu

Rcaw‘
right aback

axtinctian

left

oxosomoathoslu

:-

chatk~

oxtruporuonnl
apa¢o

tough

right thehwright

touch

loft

touch
tnunh

right handplaft hand
right ahaak~lort hand

tench

loft aback-right

pinpriak

right aback-loft

ptnpriak
pinpriek
pinpriok

10ft chookbright hand

lart

right ahookaright

right

10ft ohuak~lort h:nd

1.1% chook-

axoaanosthnaiu

pinpriek

right chopkwleft

right

oxaaamaathclia

(ayes Open)
.

r.

.

.

adamant:

1

hand

chnokwlerﬁ hand

right «hank
right cheek
torrent
right aha¢k~

qxtinetion
poraevoration
aiaplaeanant

hand

10ft chock
10ft ehaak10ft hand

allouthaslt

hand

right

displtaunant

hand

hand

10ft

ohnak~

aback
ohock

.

dho¢k

«xeraporlonal
span.
shack»

nztrtparuannl

oxtinatien

txtinctian

:pton

rhrno—plun and rouﬁwplul vniponsos

invarisbly
inninatogdinoani of thoﬁbrain. inn: 1:. nnvur fauna in normal
ﬁdults or in patiants with plyahogonin diuordgru.
I

ﬁhnaa rbaponses have bash oocasionnlly noon, howuvor, 1n

nerull childrnn undsr the as. at at; (h);

agad potions withuut
(6) had manual dnroetivna (19).

manifoat disaaso or thﬁ brain
rho diltrdbution of tha ruapanseu a! the ohildron and ugod
poruanl are rolatnd ntinly ta ago. in. yaungnnt childrun and
tho oldnlt adult. show thruo~p1u1 ind rourwplub rulponqon.

�16.
Wiﬁh

thin.

«hangs: in age away tram

untruunu, ono~plun Ind

Iroqunht. or the tubjccbs
lith.nnntal dtfiei¢nny, than. with in. lowgat annual agthavo
ﬁbroeoplun':nd teurvpluj roupannaa whila ona~plus and two91ua rcapensoa prndaminutu in nubjnota with highnr’mnntal
twowplua rulponsaa baoama mare

_

I

aguu‘

II

aummurises thn

dintribution a: tbs four different
typaa at rulpnnyeu twang tbs variau: groups or aubjoetl. Gnly
Tabln

‘pgtlonts with In argania mmntal syndrana.nhow unreguplus and
rourbplua teaponaoa. Such roapunaes may be aansidorad ditgu
nbstio or an organic unntul ayndrumn.

mm ;;
Prwqusnay or 0n¢~P1uu

to

Faun-Elna Tﬁat in Dirforant Gwoupa
nogntlvu Gaga
Pku

Organic Hantal syndruua

adult: (below
your: a: as.)

Norunl

taut

60

99%

Schizophrtnia Adult.
Patimntu with anxiety

nnarly

Patients with plyahn~

-7o%

states

,

asarly

genie dnproasian
(all age grnupa inaludad)

W!

"'

19%

Tue?

Three Paar-

Plgg‘

Plus

7%

25%

33%

25%

15

o

o

a

dooaa~

:11

Paaittvo
at Subjects

Four~P1un

P§uu

P;ul

rarg new.» navor

ionglly
oooas- ray. navar‘ novor

all

tonsil:
22%

85

o

o

,

In unavor to the questions railed in tn» introduation,
our rounltu indicnto that four gonoral typos of paaitiva

�.11.
faooahand touts occur‘gnd that than. typo: «an bo carrolatod
with airfaront greupn at aubjoats (Tablc II). Our attention
Ill fauna-d mainly on thg question cf ﬁhathar there in: a

typ. or rouponse which oeaurrod only in pubinnts with savart
4180330 of chi bra1n._ All adult subjootn with u thrionplun

.

-

or rourwplua v.3ponno haw. orgtn1o brain dictate. Suéh rua
uponaou 1:3 nave: icon in manual subjgatu er patient: with
payahogan1l disardnrn, even though than. group. any oocunlonnlly
than onnnplun or twonplua traponnnn.

'

Patigntn with atrabral dinette manifesting a four-plus
nonpango

invaritbly that tho novonast or must udvunnod foam

of mantul abungal. Othorulao thaw. in nu good aorrolat1an
botwoon thy typo at pou1tivo tiéowhand tout 1nd tho soverreyv
9f thn unhaorial daroatn. 3am: putionta with aovnro monﬁal
ahnngps may'havo

anxy;

two«p1ua vouponso.

1n

additian,

105‘

or pationtu with an orgnnIo manealinyndromn.hnvh a magazivo
faaa~hand taut, It is rhalisod that tho use of I one to taut»
plun nonnnoiutur. £6» Eh. groups umplies an inoronﬁing dagruc
or aeropral'dyatunation. This namnnslntumo van used because
of aonvonicnaa and aunh an implicition in not intended.
Th1; olauitiaatlnn af 3 poauin rues-hand test should
be useful elinioglly. 'In téuﬁing nouiologioal patients, uh.
cxaat type or positive taco-hand tout Ihauld be renordpd.
rather thtn tha datlgnation ”the tao§~haad test was positivo'

until nan. Bach a proeoduro «111 makd 1t
Judgo whatnot tha typo or poaitivo runomhand ﬁont

as has buon don.

aasiar to

indicatcs dotinita oorabrnl discus. or whnthnr
manifcptntiou at tnzitty or dapruauian.

who

it may

be c

use or much a

'

�12.

alanairication will also make it easier to ounpuio tho roayenno
or patlontl at diffcrtnt tin»: during thuir illniaa. In ad»
dition, 1t. 1. “1mm. in cumin). “perm-am work, for it

has bean aypllod in studio: or thn urfpetn otdrugn on pircaption, and tho rutponlal at pat1¢nta t6 olootrouhook truatu
want. in aueh Itudioa altnrution in pottuptian can be mat»

.

stand by abaovwing tbs duration and tho incidnnao cf thn varioty at positive tano~hnnd tests during tho period: of teating.
Sulnagz:

'

stundardizttian of tha {tonohand tout in prntontod.
A positive faoouhnnd taut
it danorihod In on. in uhiéh orrart
portint .13.: tho_tunth trial. Pour clause: of positivo tuto—
A

hdnd

teats urn racerdod.

ann~p1ua fnoo~hand

A

tott aensiaﬁl

of oxtination only with touch stimuli. A tro~plun renponso
is charuatoriaod by axt1notion with p1npr1ck und rubbing atims

uli,
ﬂ

as

‘ill

an

Iith touch

stimuli.

thrna~p1us nonponno
tontlata or oxtinoticn and displaeumont 11th tough. rubbing,
tad pinpriak stimuli. A rourbplup runyonao ha.
til tho tharhl
aotariatica of a throu~p1ul response and invadditian at least
one at thn following ronturos: a) Oxasamntthoaia; b) ulleathnlinz
A

.

c) poraovonntion af roaponnasz d) ooourrenao or errors even
whilo tha subject 8063 tbs application at the stimuli. Throo~

plus and four-plus weaponnea invaritbly indicate dinette of
tbs bra1n in subject: evor tho ago of :11 yours. 0no~plua
and trauplun roapqnaea occur

in ptt1antn with brain disnaac
amall number of normal adult: and

but are 3139 maniteathd by a
ptt1ontn with paychogonia‘diaoranrt. Patients with a faur~plul

�I
“‘"’

13l-

tho ”want maul change; but ﬂan canny“
1.8 not Ema.
morn is no corraluion human t)» unrity
of the manta), uhmgu m4 tho
or punitive: rum-hind
z'oapcmao show

taut

tn.

awaited. m unfulnbu

or this

the study at panama clinically and in

it

indicatad.

_

cluuu‘iutim in

01$“:de

work

�I
-m...‘

‘

‘

hm

W

l:

BEXEER,

‘BENDER.

in

hhn

:nd GREEK, ﬂ.:
.é.:355. 1951.

K.B.: FINE,

«option on sinnlt

2.

.

3.3.;

on: tout: of fans and hsnu.

and FINK, Hg:

airfarontill

guﬁiglgﬁdo H032.

Patterns in par»

M.

Arab.

Tactile parcoptual taata

diagnouia or payohiutriu diuordnrl.

ital.

1952.

3. FIRE. 3.: GREEHA M. and BERDER, M.B.: The faoe~hnnd test.
nign of diieasa of the bruin. yourologz‘g:
:3 dig zontio

.7.

,

FIKK, H. and.BENU£R. K.B.x

.

simmltnnnout

1327p 1953*

J“FFE'

Duvnlopmnnt

tactilu stimuli in

5' ‘nd

333933*

unsathanin.
ggggral
,3

W
md-

7.
8'.

BENDER,

a

H.B.z

SHAPIRQ. HiF0‘

BEHDER,

M.B.:

Th9 phcncmanun

PM,

.

3

«hi .‘ghzslé,

.

'Wmcx. and

nonnnl childronw agggggggz

“'B-' Pofocptunl pace-an: follavinsj.
.3 urcgﬂc

a:

,GREBH.

at pdrcqptian or

.3

entanooun‘pcroaytion 1n uh.
£29.35“. 1953»

er Ionaory diuplucunynt.

@607.

E. and

1951-

Vii-159””.

“‘8‘; Exosmnthuin

or displacannnt or outnnoonu nonnation inté axtraporaondl
upuca‘ ﬁgg§.ﬂiggo;.&amp;Pnzah15§. é§§hﬂl,‘1952.
9. ‘nﬁann, 3.5. and Hamunnaen, u.: Pattorna 1n alloltbouia
tad thair rulation to disordnr of boay sebum. and other:
scnsery phnnamann. Arah.xourol.&amp;9azehiat. ég3501, 1952.
10.
ﬂ.B¢t y.".Pt19n or
I!" GREEN, MuAu ”4
51mm tanaaua stimuli b montully aorontiva subjects.
J-nOPV‘aatnm:3; m1 3. 1953.

m.

W.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2404">
                <text>Standardization of the face-hand test. Neurology. 1954 Mar; 4(3): 211-7.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2405">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2406">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-14-018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2407">
                <text>1954</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2408">
                <text>Green, Martin A.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2409">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2410">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2411">
                <text>[Preprint] and Reprint. Reprint from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, March 1954, Vol.4, No.3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2412">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2413">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74443">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81004">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87565">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94126">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="225" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="14">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/35b321c800690bb601799adad174ab44.pdf</src>
        <authentication>460a6759754060bc775314593ce1e71c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100642">
                    <text>I
‘

Table I

30 Discharge Ratings of Improvement:
Ratings of imw
provement at the three hOSpitals varied in format and detail» The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep~
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)o For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other

institutions,

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
1»

The

Sociopsychological Variables

distribution of the variables of social class, age,

education and California F Scale score
is presented in Table III.

Table

III

among the

three institutions

.

a) Social Class: The anticipated difference in social
class composition of the three institutions was observed, At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age distribution

in the institutional populationso

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2244">
                <text>Subdural hematoma developing during hospitalization, Am J Psychiatry. 1950;107(5):381-3.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2245">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2246">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-1a-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2247">
                <text>1950</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2248">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2249">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2250">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2251">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2252">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2253">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74427">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80988">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87549">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94110">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="224" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="13">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/538bdc6ba0530077be0ac863533401f5.pdf</src>
        <authentication>74bce06bc6e20def0793fd89b0e7d725</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100641">
                    <text>3mm mam mum mm nwrxrmuox
arm:

ML.

WW4;

or

A

0A3:

MA
Mb.
(ﬁrm)

g;

(\Mmc

~39:qu

QNUULJ».6§~UJ\MA1 4%

(0.2.1:? #:g

Afod.

I751:

Viz/b.

wk.

316%
3.17/‘3.

�1.

sustained by patients during hospitalisations'
in mental institutions may cause disease of the nervous systemunrelated to the original illness. The trauma may be disregarded
and the resulting complications may be interpreted as further
progression of the original mental illness, thereby thwarting
possible definitive therapy. This is most apt to occur in
patients with organic psychoses. For this reason it is felt that
a report of a case of subdural heaatcna developing during
hospitalization in a patient with organic psychosis will be of
Head trauma

interest.

‘

fiftyoeight year old white feaale a nurse was
admitted to Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital because of aental and
personality changes. Four to five years previously the patient
began to aislay objects and complained of occasional headaches.
During the next two years it was noted that she would repeat
herself in conversation, did not play bridge as often as before
and complained of a constant feeling of fatigue. One and a half
adaission
to
a marked change in her behavior occurred.
years prior
She had difficulty in asking decisions, became caliess in her
dress, nislaid objects more frequently and exhibited stereotyped
HISTGRY:

A

aoveaents (rubbing hands together, crossing legs) when excited.
During the subsequent months she became ”confused" and incontinent.
Prior to her illness the patient was a nurse doing
private duty and was described as an excellent worker. She was.
a happy individual with a pleasant and sociable disposition and
had had zany friends. She had been an excellent bridge player,
winning aany prises.

�2.

pressure was 95/60, pulse 88, temperature 98,
respirations 18. General physical examination was negative.
The patient was well nourished and alert. neurological
examination disclosed her to be aphasic and apraetio. There
were disturbances in body scheme, a left hononyuous visual field
defect was present bu t the remaining cranial nerve functions
were intact. There was no ataxia or inooordination. hotor power
was noraal. The deep tendon reflexes were active and equal
bilaterally and the plantar responses were normal. There was a
left henisensory defect to pinpriek and touch.
gegggégggz; hunter puncture disclosed clear, colorless fluid under
an initial pressure of lho an. containing 5 lymphocytes and a
total protein of 62 ng.%. The Hassernann and colloidal gold
reactions were negative. X~rays of the skull and chest were
negative. in electroencephalogram was diffusely abnormal containing
a prevalence of slow activity maximal in the temporal and
posterior parietal regions bilaterally.
GOURSIa' The differential diagnosis was that of presenile
and
cerebral neoplasm. A
degenerative disease of the brain
pneuaoeneephalograa revealed generalised dilatation of the
ventricular system without displacement or distortion. The
cortical aarkings were increased bilaterally.
The patient was kept in the hospital for further study
of her mental and sensory defects. On at least one occasion
during this period bruises were noted overthe patient's head and
fees. these were thought to be sustained tron falls or from
busping into objects on the ward. The patient remained alert
and no new neurological signs developed. Approximately three
EIAIIIAEIOK: Blood

‘

'

�months after admission the patient gradually became lethargic
and exhibited rhythmic myoclonio movements, frequent in the

corner of the mouth and the left upper extremity and
occasional in the right upper extremity. A left hemiperosia developed
end the patient became etuporoue. Lumbar puncture diacloeed
clear, oolorleee fluid under an initial preeeure or 200 mm. and
containing 3 white blood cells. Loft temporal and right
A
hugh oubdurel henntoma
were
performed.
trephinationo
perietal
was found on the right eide. It contained dark red, liquid blood.
There we: no definite aotive bleeding. The outer membrane one
very thin and the inner nenbrene wee inoonepiououe. The right
hemisphere wee nerkedly compreeeed and failed to re-expend after
evacuation of the hlnmtona. 0n the left side there were two
eubdurel membranes about 3~5 mm. apart and oontaining a small
amount or yellowish fluid between then. There wee no blood. A
cerebral biopsy wee teken.fron the left parietal lobe by introducing
a glaee euotion tube for a distance of one inch at a right angle
to the eurteoe of the cortexand eepirating a specimen.
Following operation the patient became more alert but
the apheeie and the disturbance in body scheme were more marked

left

and epeeoh was

unintelligible.

The myoolonie movements

diaeppeered and the left henipareeie improved. Seventeen days
efter operation a pneunoencephelogran showed dilated lateral
ventricle: more marked on the left side. The enterior and
poeterior horns were aeynaetrioal and slightly diapleoed to the
left. The patient died eight days later. An autopsy was not
obtained.
hieroaeopio examination of the cerebral biopsy at the

�shoved numerous

senile plaques and
time or trephinstion
Alzheimer cells, oomputible with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's
diseaoe.
signs of progreooive diocese of the cerebral
hemisphere: which this patient developed during the latter part
of hospitalization were initially interpreted as the end stage
of an organic psychoaia. In view of the head traumn sustained
exclude
done
subdurel henntonn
ward
was
the
on
trephination
to
although this diagnosis was considered improbable. That the
subdurel'hanntonntn were of recent origin.end yore not present
before hospitalization is demonstrated by the following observations:
1) s pneuloenoophnlogrsn prior to the progression or neurological
ventriculnr
showed
system without
a symmetrically dilated
signs
'diaplaoinent or distortion and increased cortical markings
nontranen
the
of the hematonats were very thin.
2)
bilsterdlly;
Patients with organic ptyohosie in nentsl hospitals
are psrtioulerly prone to head trauma which may initiate subdursl
hemntamn; Progressive usurologioal signs in such patients should
be evaluated with this oonsiderstion in mind.
The

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2234">
                <text>Subdural hematoma developing during hospitalization. Arch. Neurol Psychiatry. 1951 Aug; 66(2): 230-1</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2235">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2236">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-1-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2237">
                <text>1950</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2238">
                <text>Green, Martin; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2239">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2240">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2241">
                <text>[Preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2242">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2243">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74426">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80987">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87548">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94109">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="229" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="20">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/355c4b9504ee5dda4b99daee2b72cb14.pdf</src>
        <authentication>32103451b1f3d9d0d60a0a834fb27af9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100646">
                    <text>Reprinted from—JOURNAL or THE HILLSIDE
Vol. I, No. 1, January, 1952

HOSPITAL

_

TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS IN THE
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF
PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERSl
MD.2 and MAX FINK, M.D.3
New York, N. Y.

MORRIS B. BENDER,

Visual perceptual performance tests like the Rorschach, Thermatic Apperception and Bender Visual Gestalt tests are widely used
in the evaluation of psychiatric disorders. Recently, a simple test
of tactile perception—the face-hand test—has been described (2).
By this test, characteristic performances of normal adults (2) and
patients with diffuse cerebral dysfunction (3) have been differentiated.
The face-hand test is an application of the technique of multiple simultaneous stimulation (1) . The examiner lightly touches,
simultaneously, the cheek and the hand of the subject. The latter
is then asked to describe and localize the stimuli. Normal adults
readily name and localize the two stimuli within the initial few
trials of the test. Once correct, they are thereafter correct on all
similar tactile stimulation tests. In contrast to normal subjects,
patients with psychoses due to disease of the brain are not able
to perceive or correctly localize one of the two simultaneously
applied 'stimuli, even after many trials of the face-hand test. They
consistently make errors in the stimuli to the hand (and con.versely, they rarely make errors in the perception Of the stimuli
to the face). This type of response has been observed in 90 per
v

'

From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University
College of Medicine, Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital and the Hillside Hospital.
This work aided. in part, by grant #MH 139 from the U. S. Public Health
Service, National Institutes of Health.
2Director of Neurologic Service, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
3 Aided by a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis.
1

,

21

�22

BENDER — FINK

cent of the patients with diffuse brain dysfunction, and has been
described as a sign of the organic mental syndrome (3) .
These simple tactile perceptual tests have now been applied
to patients with hysteria, schizophrenia and psychic depression.
The responses of these patients to repeated trials of the face-hand
test will be described.
SUBJECTS

The subjects were patients from the wards of Bellevue

Psy-

chiatric HOSpital. These patients had one of the following conditions: schizophrenia, psychoneuroses, psychic depressions or organic psychoses. The patients with schizophrenia manifested the
various clinical varieties of the disorder. The patients with psychoneuroses were those hospitalized for severe anxiety, reactive depression, or behavioral outbursts necessitating inpatient observation.
The patients with depression in this group were predominantly
young adults in whom the psychiatrist obtained a history of recent
stress precipitating admission to the hospital. In addition, patients
with diagnoses of “character disorder” or “behavioral disorder,”
and without evidence of psychosis, were included in this group.
Patients with depressions were studied in two groups. The
young adults with “reactive depressions” were included in the
group of patients with psychoneuroses. The second group were
the older adults, in whom the diagnosis of involutional psychosis
was made. In some instances, these patients presented evidence
of impairment of memory, concentration, calculation, and orientation. The diagnostic differentiation of their disorder from psychoses
due to disease of the brain was difﬁcult. The diagnoses were usually
made after extended periods of observation and with the aid of
psychometric studies.
The patients classiﬁed as having organic psychoses manifested
the usual memory disturbances, disorientation, emotional lability
and confusion characteristic of the “organic mental syndrome” (3) .
The etiology in these cases varied between central nervous system
syphilis, posttraumatic states, senility, presenile dementia and
alcoholism.

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

23

METHOD

During a routine examination, the face-hand test is applied.
The patient is asked to close his eyes. In the sitting position, with
his hands lying naturally in his lap, the patient’s cheek, and
dorsum of the hand on the side opposite to the cheek, are simultaneously touched by the examiner’s ﬁngers. The patient is then
asked “What did you feel?” The normal adult usually points to the
cheek and states: “You touched me here" or “I felt something
here,” making no mention of the stimulus to the hand.
The patient is again asked to close his eyes, and the stimulation repeated. This time the opposite cheek and hand are touched.
He is asked whether he had felt anything. The usual response is a
correct localization and identiﬁcation of both stimuli. If only one
stimulus is reported, it is the stimulus to the cheek. At this time,
the examiner asks: “Did you feel another touch anywhere else?”
The normal subject usually points to the hand stimulated and
admits: “I felt something there—I thought you may have brushed
against it.”
On the third and fourth trials of the face-hand test, the cheek
and hand of the same side of the body are stimulated—ﬁrst on one
side and then on the other. Finally, both cheeks and then both
hands are stimulated. This sequence of six tests is repeated. Subsequent to these trials, other parts of the body are tested in a
similar fashion, such as cheek and foot, or breast and hand.
Cutaneous stimuli other than a light touch have been used such
as multiple light touches (rubbing), single pinpricks, multiple
pinpricks, and less frequently, temperature tubes (hot-cold) and
tuning forks (c128). With these cutaneous stimuli the obserVations
are qualitatively the same as with touch stimulations, although the
frequency of errors is much less (2).
In each case where defects were apparent on face-hand tests,
standard tests of single stimulation by touch and pinprick were
applied. Only a few subjects, those with evidence of focal cerebral
damage, myelopathy or peripheral neuropathy, made errors on
these single stimulation tests. Their reactions were not considered
in these results.

'

'

�24

BENDER — FINK
RESULTS

The usual responses of the normal adults to the face-hand test

were: (a) perception of one stimulus only—usually the one to the
cheek, and only rarely the one to the hand; (b) perception of the
two stimuli, correctly localized; and (c) perception of two stimuli,
but one mislocalized. This mislocalization was almost always a
mislocalization of the hand percept, which was displaced to the
homolateral cheek. Such "displacements" were rare in the normal,
but frequent in subjects with disease of the brain.
Normal adults manifested incorrect type (a) and (c) responses
on the initial few trials only. As reported previously, 50 per cent
of the normal adults made errors on the initial trial of the facehand test; 22 per cent on the second trial; and errors became less
and less frequent until by the tenth trial, less than 1/2 per cent
still made errors (2). It is apparent that normal adults can readily
discriminate two tactile stimuli and accurately localize these within
the ﬁrst few trials of the test. Also, once the normal adult was
correct on one trial, he was found to be correct on all subsequent
trials regardless of the body part tested or the rapidity with which
the tests were applied.
Adults with Psychoneuroses: Most of the subjects with psychoneuroses responded in a fashion similar to normal adults on both
the initial and on multiple trials of the face-hand test. Subjects
with manifest anxiety, after identifying the cheek stimulus on the
initial trial, perseverated in this response. Through many trials
they persisted in naming only the cheek stimulus, even insisting
that there was no other stimulus. This type of report was maintained until the examiner emphasized that there were two stimuli.
As soon as the subjects realized that there were two stimuli they
were correct both in naming and localizing subsequent simultaneous stimuli, as well as single stimuli interspersed at random.
During the time that errors were apparent on multiple trials of
the face-hand test, these anxious patients never displaced a
stimulus, i.e., recognized that there had been two stimuli, but
mislocalized one to another body part. It was as if they were in
a mental set of “oneness," and this set persisted until broken by

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

25

the examiner. When they got into a mental set of "twoness," they
were correct on all subsequent trials, perceiving and correctly
localizing the two stimuli.
In a majority of patients with hysteria, including those with
hysterical amnesia, the face-hand tests showed normal responses.
In a few the responses were abnormal. Thus there were some who
reported the sensation on one side of the body correctly, but denied
all stimuli on the side which showed a hysterical type of sensory
defect. There were some patients who showed "allocheiria.”4 They
mislocalized a stimulus from one side of the body to a homologous
part on the opposite side. This mislocalization or displacement
occurred from the side with hysterical defective sensation to the
side with normal sensation.
Adults with Schizophrenia: Most patients with schizophrenia
were able to discriminate the stimulus applied to the face and
hand correctly on the ﬁrst few trials just as normal adults could.
However, there were a number of patients in this group who
presented bizarre responses. The touch stimuli were occasionally
misidentiﬁed and were reported as “a burning” or “a ﬂy crawling.”
Frequently, the number of percepts were multiplied. Instead of
perceiving the two applied stimuli they reported three, four or
even six percepts in a variety of body parts. Similarly, a single
stimulus was reported as two, three or four percepts, occasionally
omitting the locus of the original stimulus. Such patients usually
persisted in the bizarre behavior on repeated testing on subsequent
days. In two instances, there were bizarre responses even when the
test was applied with the eyes open. A number of the paranoid
patients refused to close their eyes and permitted examination
provided they could see. Obviously, under this condition, they
were correct on all trials of the face-hand test.
Patients with schizophrenia, admitted to Bellevue Hospital for
frontal lobe “topectomy” operations, were able to perceive and
4The term allocheiria should be distinguished from allesthesia. According to

Ernest jones, the British psychoanalyst, the crossed sensory displacement manifested by patients with hysteria is to be called allocheiria, while that shown by
patients with disease of the nervous system is to be called allesthesia. Based on
our experience the distinction between the two is made largely on the total
clinical picture. In one there is the long history and symptoms typical of
hysteria, while in the other the history and neurologic signs show patterns
characteristic of organic disease (4).

�26

BENDER — FINK

localize the two simultaneous stimuli during the initial period of
testing. During the ﬁrst two weeks after topectomy operations,
however, the patients manifested the “organic” type of response
to the face-hand test. As will be described later, this pattern consisted of omissions and mislocalizations of stimuli on repeated
testing. As the patients recovered from the operation, the errors
on repeated trials of the face-hand test decreased. Ultimately, they
correctly reported the simultaneous cutaneous stimuli and reacted
in a manner no different from the nonoperated schizophrenic
patients or normal subjects.
Patients with Psychic Depression: Patients with “reactive depression" were co—operative and usually correct on the initial as
well as on subsequent trials of the face-hand test. Their responses
were most like the normal pattern. Of the patients with severe
involutional melancholia, some were frequently unco-operative.
They were suspicious of the request to keep their eyes closed and
if they permitted stimulation, would report only one of the stimuli.
The stimulus they reported was the one to the face. They omitted
the one to the hand. Like the patients with manifest anxiety, they
frequently persisted in giving one response through many trials—
until the idea of “twoness” was apparent to them. Thereafter, they
were usually correct in their responses (Case I).
Patients with a manic excitement correctly identiﬁed the two
stimuli on the initial trial of the face-hand test. On subsequent
trials they were frequently unco-operative, commenting that the
test was too easy, or silly; when co-operative they were usually
correct on subsequent trials.
Organic Mental Syndrome: The reactions of the patients with
organic mental syndromes to multiple trials of the face-hand test
are different from those observed in normal subjects or patients
with neurosis or schizophrenia. Ninety per cent of all patients with
organic mental syndrome repeatedly fail to report one of the two
stimuli, or when reporting two, mislocalize one of them. Again the
perceived stimulus is the one applied to the face. The Stimulus to
the hand is usually not perceived or it is mislocalized. This type
of response is consistent and highly predictable.
A patterned response is also apparent in tests of body areas
other than the face and hand. An “order of dominance” in tests

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

27

of other body areas could be established in these patients. In this
order the face is the most dominant with penis, trunk, breast,
foot, thigh and hand less dominant, in descending order. When
tactile stimuli are simultaneously applied to any two body areas,
the errors in localization will occur in the part of lesser dominance.
For example, if stimuli are applied simultaneously to the cheek
and penis, the patient will report the cheek stimulus alone; but if
the stimuli are applied to the penis and the hand, then the stimulus
to the penis will be reported.
These omissions and mislocalizations of percepts persist for
many trials and on many days of testing. The inability of the
patient with an organic psychosis to discriminate two cutaneous
stimuli is so consistent, that it is considered a sign of the organic
mental syndrome (3) (Case 2).
Eﬂect of Electro-Convulsive Therapy: In patients with schizophrenia or psychic depressions, electro—convulsive therapy induces
a similar “organic" type of reaction to the face-hand test. During
the period of confusion immediately following the treatment, the
patients consistently report only the cheek stimulus or mislocalize
the hand stimulus to the check. This is transient during the ﬁrst
few treatments, but near the end of a course of therapy these reactions persist for longer and longer periods, until they are apparent hours or even days after the treatment. Patients who had
a course of electro-convulsive therapy and were readmitted to the
hospital after a lapse of months failed to show this “organic” re-

action.

CASE REPORTS

The following case reports are selected as illustrating the types

of responses observed.
Case I: S. S., a forty-year-old woman, was admitted to the neurological service complaining of backaches in recurrent episodes of
eight years. During the past year she noted difﬁculties in recollection and in her ability to calculate. She had been a bookkeeper
and now found herself unable to calculate accurately or rapidly
enough to continue work. On occasions she had misplaced valuable
family possessions only to ﬁnd pawn tickets in their place.

�28

BENDER — FINK

During interviews under sodium amytal she cried readily and
related many recent family difﬁculties, including the suspension
of her husband’s license as an auctioneer and her son's classiﬁcation in IA by Selective Service. Her difﬁculties apparently began
with these events.
Medical and neurological examinations were negative except
for some varying areas of hypesthesia and hyperesthesia. Psychiatric
examination revealed marked psychomotor retardation. There were
deﬁcits in memory and calculation. She was able to relate details
of her history and of world events, but was unable to relate details about her work or family affairs. These latter details were
readily apparent, however, in interviews under the inﬂuence of
sodium amytal. On simple calculation tests she made few errors,
though she was slow in response. On more complex tests commensurate with her occupation as a bookkeeper, she made numerous errors and showed many hesitations. Many answers were
reported questioningly. The admission clinical diagnosis was “organic disease of the brain.” This was based on such symptoms as
psychomotor retardation, memory deﬁcits and difﬁculties in calculation.
Face-Hand Test: On the initial face-hand testing the patient
persisted in giving the cheek response only for eight trials, but
thereafter, was consistently correct for twenty trials. There were no
displacements of percepts. On subsequent days she was correct on
the initial and all subsequent tests. These ﬁndings suggested that
the symptoms were not due to disease of the brain.
Course in Hospital: To exclude organic disease the patient
was subjected to a series of tests. Neurological examinations,
electroencephalography and pneumoencephalography revealed no
evidence of organic brain disease. A psychological survey revealed
an average intellectual capacity (IQ 106) without any evidence
of organic deterioration. The personality survey revealed severe
anxiety and depression, with some bodily preoccupations. The
ﬁnal diagnosis was depression and the patient was discharged
for further care in the psychiatric clinic.
Comment: This case illustrates the problem in the differentiation of psychic depressions and organic psychoses. As a rule we
found that the preservation of the ability to discriminate and

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

29

localize double tactile stimuli speaks against organic disease. Only
10 per cent of patients with organic mental syndrome showed
normal response to the face-hand tests. The converse was not true.
There were no instances in which a normal person made persistent
errors on face-hand tests. If errors are made, it usually turns out
that the patient has disease of the brain, no matter how bizarre
the mental picture may be. This is illustrated by the next case.
Case 2: H. B., an elderly white male appearing about sixty years
of age, was admitted by the police who found him wandering
about the streets. He was unable to give his name or home address. He did not answer questions, though he spontaneously requested water and food. A few days after admission he began to
speak freely, gave his name as “The Messiah” and his home as the
hospital. He was facetious, quick in speech and coherent. A complete delusional system relating to God, the patient’s previous
sojourn in heaven, his mission on earth, etc., was related. No
other anamnestic data were available.
Under further observation he showed the Ganser syndrome.
For all questions of orientation, general information and calculation, he answered relevantly but was only approximately correct. He
was almost but not quite right. He did not answer any questions
of personal history except for the distant past and then he related
a disjointed, rambling, confabulatory story. To many observers it
seemed as if the patient had a “hysterical” type of psychosis.
During examination on admission the patient appeared chronically ill. The blood pressure was 180/100 and urine contained
four plus sugar. There were hemorrhages and exudates in the
ocular fundi. Neurological studies showed absent ankle jerks, diminution of vibration sense in toes and ankles, with normal position,
touch and pinprick perception. Other defects were apparent on
special sensory studies.
Face-Hand Test: On the face-hand test this patient presented
an “organic" pattern. In the initial testing, he repeatedly reported
only one of the two stimuli—that of the face. After many trials
and a number of trials with eyes open, he began to report the
two stimuli but now mislocalized the hand percept to the cheek.
In testing on consecutive days, similar mislocalizations and omiso
sions were apparent, both on the face-hand test and on similar

�BENDER — FINK

30

tactile tests of other body parts. An abstract of the record, which
evinces the “organic” pattern on double simultaneous stimulation
testing with light touch stimuli is presented here.

Stimulation
Right cheek, left hand
Left cheek, right hand
Right cheek, right hand
Left cheek, left hand
Right and left cheeks
Right and left hands
Right cheek, left hand
Left cheek, right hand
Left cheek, left hand
Right cheek, right hand

Response
Right cheek
Left cheek
Right cheek
Left cheek
Correct
Correct
Right and left cheeks
Right and left cheeks
2 percepts left cheek
Right cheek
»

Further neurological studies revealed a diffusely abnormal
electroencephalogram; a symmetrically, diffusely dilated ventricular
system on pneumoencephalography; and evidences of organic deterioration on the psychological tests.
Course in the Hospital: Under observation the patient showed
a gradual and persistent improvement. After six weeks in the hospital he recalled some facts whichled to his entering Bellevue. He
remembered his address and social security number. As he improved clinically errors on the face-hand tests became infrequent.
When the errors were sparse, intravenous administration of three
grains of sodium amytal produced once again the persistent omission and mislocalization of percepts characteristic of the organic
mental syndrome.
Comment: Here is a patient who was thought to be hysterical
but the face-hand test contradicted this impression. The persistence
of errors on multiple trials of the face-hand test made us think
of an organic disorder. The subsequent special Studies conﬁrmed
this suspicion.

CONCLUSION

‘

As with visual perceptual tests, such as the Rorschach, this
simple tactile test- the face-hand test—has been found to be useful

�TACTILE PERCEPTUAL TESTS

31

in evaluating psychiatric patients. Anxiety, paranoid attitudes,
autistic thinking and misinterpretation of environmental stimuli
are manifest on face-hand tests. Characteristic behavior patterns
are seen in some schizophrenic and hysteric patients. In the evaluation of patients with mental changes due to dysfunction of the
brain the face-hand test is of diagnostic signiﬁcance. The inability
of these subjects to discriminate the two simultaneous stimuli on
repeated trials and the characteristic errors of omission or mislocalization of the hand stimulus are unique. Such errors are not
observed in normal, schizophrenic, hysteric or depressed adults.
REFERENCES

(l) Bender, Morris B.: “The Advantages of the Method of Simultaneous Stimulation in the Neurological Examination." Med. Clin. North America,

32: 755-758, 1948.
(2) Bender, Morris B., Fink, Max and Green, M.: “Patterns in Perception in
Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand." Trans. Am. Neurol. Assoc, 75:
250-252, 1950; and Arch. Neurol. da- Psychiat., 66: 355-362, 1951.
(3) Fink, Max, Green, M. and Bender, Morris B.: “The Face-Hand Test as a
Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome.” Neurology, 2, 1952.
(4) Jones, Ernest: “The Pathology of Dyscheiria." Rev. Neurol. 62' Psychiat., 7:
499, 599, 1909.

�Adrxbﬁéf
.74

8}

Mr €14;di

£;¢/Cﬁ¢é/

"551,35”

MIL! 1'me mmnmmmmmem

WWW.“

t

I!!!” ’0

m; '0”.

m ”It. lab.“

mmalmdodm1m.

u”W I 3mm
’W.
M

from
'

m mum: Wt!” :09 mm

�1.

m1 mm: Mm mu 11h th- mm,

Ana-mum m um- "um: mun mu no new
mm
and the minus! WW
month. I
W.
bun
ﬂu fun-hm mt ..
“I910 «at at mun
1a

mutton (1).

01’

Mus:

III-

m»

wanton. mmquwA‘omo-«mx

ummmamuqmnm
““1”“qu
ummm.
mwmeummnuumotmmoammu
Imam «mum new W W. um:mu.man-mummme. mamas-m
(3).

.Iommumxu
umumumnmm-ms.
“mammmm-mnumnmmmlmmo:

must. MOMMMMWWtuInImm
mun imam mu. In “an.“ to null). lawn“. ”than

uawmuamamhuuammmnuunnn

”0mm 1mm“ mor m mix-mm» mat-cum.
mt. ”mutant:
metMude-vm
mma‘mumumm, (Manama-"11, swam»
”mummunwmumuumm). mm.

«mummmwmwpumtamutmu
nummmmummmmmnmuaamu
(9).
cu

mm
m.
m
Mswumuummmuuummmxmu

”that. with mm.

W

In!

mm Winn.

ﬂu

mamumummmumtmmm:
uni-mm.

W muummmummm ”hum
no

Bsychiatric

MAMEAM—

������mun.
m'msm'vcmmmmmwmumnmu.
”In!!!“
mmmwmmmumm
mmu'mm. bummumunwwm‘m.m

M
smut-um “mm. ‘m an mm»:
Human“ u: m [mun to m when an am «a u

1'.

rmm‘mum mummmmmmmu-

W‘W
mwnw»mmmm(mxb
muxmmcu*m”mmtum.

mum amt” mum m m
u‘mmmmmmnwmmmmt.
mu.- Mvm may Wﬂﬂﬁ. mun: mt m ”It
1mm“ mm a mu

mw’

mmm.uumtmmxum~owmmt

«:th
mommmummumamwm
mmmmwmmmmauumuum
,

,

tum-«mumnmuu

mun "mum

Mmmnmumunu
mamm:mmmymummmumm

am.u'mmaummhwmwm.mm
thswmmumm/umm. mama-tom“

summ~m1munumamm. MIWUIW

nammmmmmm
AutmmumowmmtoMWmu

‘

owmmmum.xu*m«m'mmnc
mwmamhnmwumucm. tum

ommmummwuum.m.m.m.
mums!»

Mummm.nmm.
«mxmnmwumuuummmm.mm
mxmnunmuummuimwmm.
to

‘mph.

3.:

m m mauummx:

m!

mm m m.

���AWmmu
mmwmtwmxwumwmw
woman.
”mummm
”10%:qu uuoumumum. m

3.9.

darn-Mammalian.

'

mmumwmmntwmmrn
mnmnmummmmmmmm
“In“!!!
ttuﬂﬂmeMMOW.
.tmmmmumummnwuwum
mmmudtmzmmtmcm.
”tourm‘ammumumommm
”mu-mm.
“mumwm.
mwmmmmuam'mmmumt

Rmmm.nmmm
mammu.
mtmcmmmmmwmmmummm
mmpumwh. mummwmmmc.

Mumlumommuwmuouﬂm

«m.ummwmmumrmmmma.
ammuunmmnmm.
mm.
wwwmm.wummummnm
“to“. AMM‘Mth_Mhmm.In
”Mamu'mm'ummummm.
nouns-awn»:
mm”..wamwmm.
mu- mums. to on. m mu Mm cum in W,
qunmnm. m.,mnum. scum mm an
au-

mmmu.

mwmuuummmm.
muxmammmmnmmmm.
umwuuimwuuw. mm
-__,

'

._

,._,-_-__A

,,

7.

��W
.Iwm.mm
mm.wtm

18.

W
mm

mm
mm
mm
cm:

numm,msm

Lanna-«.mm

summit-um
umumm
mm» .m. 1mm
mm.mm
Mum. 3mm

com:

mcmxmm
unusual-um

ame- am one»:

mm
minim am.- man may W
W
nuts-mogul”; mun-menu. my alum mutual"
mu- maniacs-19w;
We «men.

amt¢m4ﬂwtm

_

u

n

and

an

m

or

an on tho monument mu.
4... .4
4 4. m omen the pun-at
'

m
mlmmum Wt. maummmmxm

hmm-mmumchmumumuuum.

a

In

muumummxmwm. Mun-mm:
mm
ultumummmwmmmt.
auburn. um manta-um mm
mm
«nmumnmmmmmumt mum-m
of

mama-non at

W

sun-«mum or at.

We mm

m.Wmuaum.mmwuumm1

but the

tau-m um minnow m. slam-1m.

'l‘lu pm“

humus-rm mummy crux. ammo-m mum-u

mammumm.
mmmmxnmu
scanned m. madam

�13.

unumwmm.mamummmm

mumuxomkmmmmtmmmzmuhm
in ”mm Wax-10 nun». mm. mm cm”...

”Mm m
WWI We!umwuum
W
mannmmwmmunoum.
In

man: ”I“.

mmmmtudWm-W. mama»
umwmuumnmmmmumun
mummMMMouomdumuum~
xmun«mmumumu. “Immune!

mum.m.mmunmmmm

�1"

5.3..
In “tumA:tn mum
mm.
m.
a! mom
tn Imam”11mm“:
tutu
«am
12!. ISO-$52. 1950
(h)
In Putt"!!! 1!! Mun
I3. ’3‘.
ﬁ
lm
I.“
or
in“
a)

g

.

m

m.
2&amp;3.ass-m.mum. 195;.
3131,! “m;
'o.nl
I151!

ﬂ“1»

3.
'

u.’

1:1...)t
I

M‘u
m.
m

I.“
mac-In

or

u

11.3.; a». «mm»
mm,
“mum in m

of

M‘(coho
a. “‘CM
[mien II”.
'

m
minimum.

Mini“!
Wu:
up ”may of Mama-n
‘99.
999»
IL
1909
31, 755.753:

m

W:

IMO

o:
‘

MW
ammu-

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2284">
                <text>Tactile Perceptual Tests in the Differential Diagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders. Journal of the Hillside Hospital 1: 21-31, 1952.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2285">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2286">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-4-006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2287">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2288">
                <text>Bender, Morris B.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2289">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2290">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2291">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from Journal of the Hillside Hospital Vol. I, No. 1, January, 1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2292">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2293">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74431">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80992">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87553">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94114">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="242" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="33">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/4092f702c20d2db606a33fb51b3082e2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>eb5e272391290df4e9e5af41a15c37b2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100659">
                    <text>THE “AMYTAL TEST” IN PATIENTS
WITH MENTAL ILLNESSl
ROBERT L. KAHN, Ph.D.,2 MAX FINK, M.D.,3
EDWIN A. WEINSTEIN, M.D.4

and

Recent studies have demonstrated the value of utilizing amytal
sodium as a diagnostic test for the presence of brain damage (9, 10,
ll) . Under the inﬂuence of this drug, certain changes in orientation
and awareness of illness occurred in patients with brain disease that
rarely appeared in persons without demonstrable brain pathology.
These changes included patterns of disorientation for place, time,
and person, and verbal denial of illness and incapacity.
In addition to disorientation and denial of illness, other changes
in verbal pattern and the nonverbal aspects of behavior occur in
both patients with brain disease and in normals.l5 All of these aspects
of behavior have contributed to an understanding of the relationship of the psychological and physiological effects of the drug and
the role of language in adaptation to stress.
Until now the normals have consisted of patients with peripheral
nerve, spinal root and cord lesions and miscellaneous medical and
surgical conditions. There has been no systematic investigation of
patients with mental illness unassociated with demonstrable brain
changes.
1From the Neurological Services of Hillside Hospital and The Mount Sinai
Hospital, New York.
This investigation was supported in part by the Medical Research and Development Board, Ofﬁce of the Surgeon-General, Department of the Army under
Contract No. DA-49-007-MD-376 and by a grant-in-aid from the Lilly Research
Laboratories.
Dr. Max Fink was aided by a fellowship from the National Foundation for
Infantile Paralysis.
2 Research Assistant, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
3 Research Director, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
4Consultant, Neuropsychiatric Division, Army Medical Service Graduate
School, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D. C.
5 Normal is used here to refer to patients without evidence of brain disease.
3

�4

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

The purpose of this study is, by the administration of the test
to a series of patients hospitalized for mental illness, to:
(l) evaluate further the diagnostic validity of the procedure;
and
(2) compare the patterns of altered symbolic expression found
in mental patients with those shown by other groups.
METHOD

Consecutive admissions to Hillside Hospital were selected. Patients who had recently received electroshock treatment or who were
clinically disoriented were excluded. Sixty-eight interviews were
essayed: eight patients refused the test, three showed insufﬁcient
physiological effects, and one patient was grossly disoriented in the
pretest interview, leaving a total of ﬁfty-six patients who were adequately studied. No attempt has been made to classify the patients
according to clinical diagnosis, although most were considered to
have schizophrenic or depressive reactions. Thirty-four women and
twenty-two men were tested, the ages ranging from sixteen to sixtyﬁve, with a median of thirty-six years.
TEST PROCEDURE

Immediately before and during the administration of amytal
sodium, each patient was examined systematically for orientation
and awareness of illness. These questions were based on previous
observation of certain patterns of disorientation and denial observed
in patients with brain disease (6, 7) and are as follows:
What is your main trouble? Why did you come here? Where are
you now? What do you call this place? What kind of place is this?
Where is this place located? How far from here do you live? Have
you ever been in any other hospital of this name? Where were you
last night? What is today’s date? What month is this? What year is
this? What time is it now? What part of the day is it? Who am I?
Have you ever seen me before?
Along with the routine test, the patients were asked two additional questions to obtain further material for the study of patterns
of symbolic expression:
If you could have one wish what would you wish for? Can you
think of a joke?
The amytal sodium was given intravenously in a solution of 0.5

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

5

gm. in 10cc. of distilled water at a rate of 0.05 gm. per minute. As
the drug was administered the patient was asked to count backwards from 100 to l. The injection was continued until the patient
showed rapid nystagmus on lateral gaze in each direction, slurred
speech, errors in counting backwards and drowsiness. These were
regarded as indicators of the physiological effects of the drug. The
total amount injected depended on the appearance of a maximal
effect of the drug. In this study the quantity given ranged from
0.2 gm. to 0.5 gm.
When the physiological action of the drug was manifest, the
patient was interviewed with the same series of questions. If an
error was made, the question was repeated immediately to determine
its persistence. Only persistent errors have been regarded as indicative of brain disease since it has been found that normal controls
may make transient mistakes (9).
RESULTS

Prior to Administration of Drug
These patients as a group showed many overt indications of fear
and distrust in the test situation. This was shown by the large
number who refused the test altogether. Some wanted to consult
their doctors or their families ﬁrst, while others were too frightened
to enter the examination room. Even among those who took the

A. Behavior

test there were numerous manifestations of distrust. Several were
reluctant to lie down—one sitting up throughout the entire procedure, one constantly keeping one foot on the ﬂoor, and several
keeping their heads raised. Many patients asked for speciﬁc details
of the test—its purpose, what drug they were getting, why they
were selected, whether this was a “truth test,” whether the results
were conﬁdential and, commonly, whether they would go to sleep
or not know what they were saying. One patient asked if he were
going to be killed. Another asked that a nurse be present. Some
patients asked us to postpone the procedure or said, “I shouldn’t
have come.” These manifestations of evasion and suspicion were
much more marked than were encountered when the test was administered to patients in general hospitals. Unlike patients with
physical diseases who usually gave as a “wish" a statement about
getting well or leaving the hospital, these patients gave many more
wishes outside the immediate situation, such as “that all men in the
universe should live in peace and harmony” or “good health for the

�6

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

sick world,” or “my daughter should
marry a nice fellow.” Further,
there was a greater tendency for patients to answer the questions
using syntax involving the third and second person as “you might
say I had a slight nervous breakdown” or “my main trouble is my

stepmother.” Patients with physical ailments are much more apt
to limit the expression of their difﬁculties to the ﬁrst
person as “I
have diabetes.”
B. Changes in Behavior Accompanying

Amobarbital Sodium

Persistent Errors: Positive Reactions
Five of the ﬁfty-six patients showed persistent changes of behavior similiar to those found in brain disease. In a previous
report
(10) positive reactions were graded from one to four plus, depending on the number of manifestations of disorientation and denial
shown. On this basis, the ﬁve positive cases in this study showed a
one plus reaction. The test was repeated in three of these cases and
showed a persistence of the one plus result in two and a negative
result in the third. Of these ﬁve patients, three showed evidence of
brain disease by other methods of study. One, a boy of eighteen, had
a positive face-hand test (2), an abnormal EEG record, and an
elevated spinal ﬂuid protein on two occasions. Another was a case
of Parkinsonism. The third showed a
memory defect on psychological tests. One was a sixty-four-year—old man who persistently
referred to “Sydenham Hospital” while under the inﬂuence of the
drug. He had a normal EEG and no presumptive evidence of brain
disease. The other patient located the hospital in “Oakland Park”
after having placed it correctly in Glen Oaks prior to receiving the
drug. The second administration of the test in this man gave a
negative result.
1.

Transient Errors
Transient errors (i.e., errors which were either spontaneously
corrected or corrected when the question was immediately repeated)
in orientation and awareness of illness have not been regarded as
diagnostic indices of brain damage. In persons with physical incapacities, the incidence is low, having been found in 16
cent
per
of the original series of ﬁfty control subjects (9). In the
present
study, however, eighteen patients, or 32 per cent, made such errors.
These included giving the incorrect year, naming the place as “Hillside Oaks" and “Psychiatric Institute” and confabulating
having
2.

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

7

been at home or in a friend’s house the night before. Some patients
used euphemisms such as “a place to help people get well,” “a place
for recuperation,” “a place to teach health to sick people,” “a
clinic,” and “the greatest hospital with the most stupendous doctors,” whereas prior to receiving the drug they had simply stated
that they were in “Hillside Hospital.” When the questions were
repeated, however, the original response was again given.

Other Alterations in Language
The use of the second or third person in response to questions
about illness and hospitalization was noted twice as frequently as
in the pre-drug interview. Another person became the subject of the
sentence or another person performed the action or became involved in an experience, whereas previously the patient had described his symptoms in the ﬁrst person. Thus the reason for
hospitalization originally given by one patient as “I was getting
worse and desperate for help” was changed to “the hospital had a
lovely reputation.” Another patient who had detailed his problems
in the ﬁrst person before receiving the drug talked about a friend
who had cancer. The change frequently took the form of concern
over the health of relatives. The wish “that I never get sick" was
changed to “I wish that my kid would stay well.” There was more
of a tendency to employ clichés as “nothing to fear but fear” and
”not for publication.” There was also more selective speciﬁcity in
answer to questions. Thus patients who had originally said that they
had come to the hospital for some illness replied that they had come
because their doctors had sent them. Other patients gave their location in a more precise way, stating for example that they were in
“a treatment room leading off the corridor.” Cryptic remarks were
occasionally given, as in the instance of the patient who, when asked
for a wish, said “If you could help me out then I wish you wouldn’t,
and if you could then I wish you would.”
These patterns were not qualitatively different from those used
by patients with physical incapacities where displacement to the
third or second person, greater speciﬁcity and selectiveness of response and increased use of clichés and slang also occur.
3.

4. Jokes

In many patients the response to the request to tell a joke seemed
to be a symbolic representation of some problem relating to illness,
hospitalization, the procedure itself or their interpersonal relations.

�KAHN ——FINK—WEIN STEIN

8

The content of these responses in relation to the illness will be
considered in a separate paper and only the pattern will be reported

here. Of ﬁfty-three patients, ﬁfteen did not respond either before
or during drug administration. Eleven patients answered by referring literally to their difﬁculties as “It would be a good joke if I
could go home,” or “The joke is my being here." Six patients used
this type of personal reference both before and during the administration of the drug, while ﬁve responded in this fashion only after
injection. Thirty-two patients gave the usual form of structured
joke, the account of the action or experience of some third person
symbolizing some aspect of the patient’s problems or motivation.
Usually patients who responded to the question in this fashion in
the pre-drug interview used the same pattern after the injection.
Seven told the same joke, while different stories were related in
ﬁfteen instances. Here the tendency was toward a more allegorical
representation of the problem. Eight patients told a joke before
receiving the drug but not after, while eight related a story only
with the drug.

Psychomotor Reactions
These changes included withdrawal, overactivity, alterations in
mood and the appearance of comic or melodramatic “ludic”6 behavior. Twelve patients showed withdrawal reactions. In the extreme form the patient failed to respond to any questions for periods
ranging from several minutes to half an hour. In other instances
the questions had to be repeated several times to elicit a response,
there was incoherent mumbling or neologisms, and incomplete
sentences were used. As such times the withdrawal appeared to be a
selective process, since the inadequate response occurred primarily
with questions relating to the patient’s illness. When questions of a
more innocuous nature were asked, such as the date or time of day,
the patient often answered quickly, clearly and completely. Marked
withdrawal has been unusual in control patients in general hospitals but has occurred frequently in patients with brain disease.
Ten patients were overactive during the test. Usually this consisted
of restlessness, shivering, rhythmic movements of the head, hips or
legs, eye blinking, or repeated fussing and adjusting of clothing.
One patient showed behavior which resembled catatonic posturing.
5.

6Ludic is the term used by Jean Piaget (5) to describe the play, imitating
and pretending aspects of behavior in young children. See also VVeinstein et a1.
(8)-

�”AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

9

Alterations in mood were noted in sixteen patients. The
predominant change was in a euphoric direction, although in two
cases the patient became tearful and depressed toward the close of
the interview. Euphoria was shown by increased smiling, giggling
or laughing, joking and expressions of well-being. Some patients
commented that they thought they had “one drink too many."
Paranoid attitudes as indicated by threatening remarks and gestures
and cursing were sometimes intermingled with euphoric manifestations. Thus one patient, who said he felt good and “would like this
more often,” answered with such expressions as “What do you think
it is, you goddamn fool” and “How the hell would I know.” The
incidence and degree of these euphoric and paranoid reactions was
comparable to those previously found in both normal control and
brain diseased groups.
Varying degrees of ludic behavior were shown, but were especially prominent in sixteen patients. In several cases this behavior
was noted in counting backwards while the drug was being injected by variation in tempo, alternately slow and fast, or use of a
sing-song rhythm. One patient barked out the numbers in a staccato
fashion, while another overemphasized the pronunciation in telephone operator fashion. One patient responded throughout the interview with an exaggerated syllabic accent and dramatic
pauses.
Another used “French” expressions such as “00, la, la.” Several
staggered excessively when brought back to the ward, particularly
when they were in sight of the other patients. One patient, who
acted in a dramatic, comic manner throughout the test,
spontaneously remarked, “I need applause.” Such ludic behavior is difﬁcult
to grade statistically but was in general more marked than had been
observed in the previously studied control
groups.
Six women patients showed some form of altered sexual behavior
under the inﬂuence of the drug. This ranged from holding the examiner’s hand and such remarks as “dear” to the behavior of one
patient who tried to kiss the examiner. A few others manifested hip
movements suggestive of sexual activity or partly exposed themselves in restless leg movements.
DISCUSSION

The results of the study provide further evidence of the validity
of the procedure as a diagnostic test for the existence of structural
brain disease. Of the ﬁfty-six patients tested, “positive” results were

�10

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

obtained in ﬁve. The others showed behavior more like that of
patients without evidence of brain damage in that they did not
develop enduring patterns of disorientation or persisting delusional
denial of illness and incapacity. In a previous study of psychotic
patients in a state hospital (9) , only one of twenty-ﬁve, a sixty-fouryear—old woman hospitalized for thirty-ﬁve years, had a positive result, a one plus response. This compares with a ﬁgure of 1 to 2
per cent positive in over one hundred and ﬁfty normal controls and
an incidence of 65 per cent in over four hundred patients with brain
disease tested in two general hospitals. It may be concluded that
while it is possible for a patient without demonstrable brain disease to yield a positive result, the difference between patients with
brain disease and other groups is statistically signiﬁcant.
In three of the ﬁve cases giving positive results, there was other
evidence of brain disease. One patient had Parkinsonism, in another
the clinical history and ﬁnding suggested a chronic encephalitis,
while in the third, degenerative or arteriosclerotic disease of the
brain was likely. One of the other positive results was found in a
patient over sixty years of age. Adequate control studies on the
effect of age on the results of this test have not yet been completed.
It is possible, however, that positive reactions may occur in older
persons comparable to the ﬁnding of slow waves in the EEG record
(1) and to changes in the perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli
(2, 3). These results suggest that in a group of patients with “functional” psychoses there are some with disease of the brain which
of
methods
of
the
be
demonstrated
by
appropriate
application
may
examination. The amytal procedure and the face-hand test of perceptual function introduced by M. B. Bender and associates (2)
are examples of such techniques and should be employed as part
of the diagnostic work-up of a mental hospital.
In considering the alterations in symbolic expression shown by
these patients it is necessary to review some data relating to the
mechanisms of disorientation for place and time and denial of
illness. These phenomena are not defects directly attributable to
brain damage in the sense that they are the manifestations of
the loss of a functional modality represented in some area of the
brain. They are, rather, forms of adaptation or defense that the
patient uses in situations of stress in a milieu of altered neural function. In disorientation, the misnamed time or place is the symbolic
representation of some motivation of the patient, usually related to
his illness, not a manifestation of memory defect. Thus the patient

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

11

is

apt to state a time antedating his illness; to give the name of a
small hospital or a place where he has been for some trivial illness;
to locate the hospital near his home; or to confabulate that he has
left the hospital. In effect, the patient is expressing his
problems in
another language where places, persons and times are not used in
their original referential context but as vehicles for the
expression
of the individual’s own motivations. Although an
impairment of
brain function is necessary to provide the type of neural organization for the maintenance of this new symbolic system, the behavior
itself is the result of the interaction of a number of factors—what
Wilder (12) has called the organism-environment-observer complex. This includes not only the neural organization, but the fact
of the disability itself, the patient’s motivation to be well, the interpersonal situation of the interview, and the patient’s previous life
experience and personality. For example, if the interview is carried
out with sterile water, there are very few changes in language. Patients with similar brain lesions may show markedly different
reactions under amytal sodium because of different
types of personality
and attitudes toward incapacity. It is quite conceivable that if this
test were carried out under very stressful conditions as in a
concentration camp, then disorientation and delusional denial might
occur in persons without evidence of brain damage.
In interpreting the effects of barbiturates one must distinguish
between purely neurophysiological manifestations such as
nystagmus
and alterations in the EEG record, which occur universally, and
adaptive symbolic changes such as withdrawal, ludic behavior,
humor, disorientation and changes in syntactical tense and
person.
It has been pointed out that even such indubitable neurological
manifestations as drowsiness and ataxia operated as language as well.
The amytal procedure is a stressful one and, contrary to
popular
belief, the drug does not “abolish” anxiety but rather provides
a
milieu where it is converted much as a schizophrenic uses a delusional system or a dreamer expresses a problem in
hallucinatory

personiﬁcations.

The relation of humor to other forms of symbolic adaptation

was of interest. Some of the jokes given used the mechanism of disorientation as in the case of the patients who referred to a hospital
(West Hill) as “Mess Hill,” or to “Hillside Cabaret.” Others used
verbal denial, as stating that the reason for coming to the
hospital
was “because I’m well.” In the usual structured joke the

patient

represented his problems in language involving third persons, more

�KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

12

material symbols (often relating to sex, food, death and violence)
and the past tense.
From this study one cannot state that mental illness is or is not
an “organic” condition. What can be stated is that these patients
exist in a very stressful environment. This is evident not only by
behavior before receiving the drug but by the larger number of
transient errors in orientation and awareness of illness, the greater
occurrence of ludic behavior and withdrawal and the more frequent
use of clichés, euphemisms and expressions involving the third and
second person as compared to the responses of patients in a general
hospital.
SUMMARY

The amytal test was given to ﬁfty-six patients in a mental
hospital. Five patients, three with other evidence of brain damage
yielded a positive result. The results are interpreted as giving further evidence of the value of the procedure as a diagnostic test for
brain damage.
2. Mental hospital patients showed more transient disorientation and denial, more withdrawal and ludic behavior and more
changes in the syntactical aspects of language than did a group of
patients with physical disabilities, but without evidence of brain
damage previously studied in a general hospital.
3. It is considered that this greater use of means of symbolic
adaptation is additional evidence that patients with mental illness
operate in a milieu of greater stress than patients with physical
1.

incapacities.

REFERENCES
Barnes, R. H., Busse, E. W., and Silverman, A. J.: Prevalence and Signiﬁcance of Electroencephalographic Abnormalities in Normal Old People,
Third Inter. Congress of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 79.
(2) Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld, 111.: Charles C. Thomas,
(1)

1952.

Fink, M., Green, M., and Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
(4) Green, M. and Bender, M. B.: Cutaneous Perception in the Aged. A. M. A.
Arch. Neurol. (9 Psychiat., 69:577-581. 1953.
(5) Piaget, J.: Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York: W. W.
Norton, 1951.
(6) Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Syndrome of Anosognosia. Arch. Neurol.
&lt;5. Psychiat., 64:772-799. 1950.
(3)

�“AMYTAL TEST" IN MENTAL ILLNESS
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)

(ll)
(12)

13

Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Patterns of Disorientation in Organic
Brain Disease. J. Neuropath. &amp; Clin. Neurol., 1:214-225, 1951.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugannan, L.: Ludic Behavior in Patients with Brain Disease. This Journal, 3:98-106, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Brain Disease. Am. ].
Psychiat., 109:889-894, 1953.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Malitz, 8.: Serial Administration of the “Amytal Test” for Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and
Prognostic Value. A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. (S- Psychiat., 71 :217-226, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A. and Malitz, 8.: Changes in Symbolic Expression with Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”). Am. ]. Psychiat., 111:198-206, 1954.
Wikler, A.: Opiate Addiction. Springﬁeld, 111.: Charles C. Thomas, 1952.

�u. «a...

as "am; W'

I!

’51!”

um MM.» 1m.

L. tell. ”.3.
mm:
LB. 0
III
A. "mun.
mt:nu.

leuelegloel mm e! Innu- lealul
beetle
lent um
halal. lee reel.

and

W1

me.
the

_Mlmulgetmmiapnmu
mtnmmmzm
e! the”
tau-teen
m Develop-at lee“. eum
e!
le. WM‘MWIQH‘.

tummmwu
tree the hilly meme “metal...
mu

by e teller-up tree the hum). mum tel- Intent“.
um
mm».
1'

�-L.

IOC.‘C utudicﬂ unﬁt daunuutlntod

$ht

thll .2 I‘llllinu

nnytul social in n atasunntte it‘s for $h0 990...». o! Irtta dn-ugo.
(1) (I) (a). ends: the tazluouat a! this drug. olrtntn chnaat- tu
aria-Sutton uni usnrunnsu a! allnouu ocuurrod 1a pattoutn with brain
«titan. tint rural, appotrod 1n.p¢:soaa without Innmnn%rublo brutn
pathology. 1!... eunuch. tnoludnd‘pattowan a! asaowttntnttoa tar
plint. tin. uni pariah an! vtrhul dauttl at 111...! “In incapacity.

studs... «tint pattatts a! alturod nyuboxto
nzpvtnnton turn found in addition to tin «hangs: in ortaatntion Ind
umnrououu 01 11150.: oaaurrtns in tin pronanan a! hrtta dtiitli. It
Inthnao

II.

indicatod that thaiq «tannin in vurbu: p$ttara :ad nonpvcrbul
Impact. 01 bahtvtor tantrihatod ta II Indornt‘ndtag at tho psychophyltologtanl cttnots a! tin drug and ti. 203’ 01 ltlcuugo 1n &amp;dnp~
an... ‘0
until no. tho control cramp. it's colltntnd a! puttnuta
with yortphcr:l atria. cptnsl root In! our! lotion: ant Ilaccllnanoun
Indian: uni aarglaul cauda‘anun. that. In: boon no IyItOIttlo tuvnut-

am.

“me. a: ”that: an aunt unu- Wat“ can mm»

Ital: chain's.

It. pntpoactot

a! tit
tant to n Intton 01 pnxtoutu Inuvitaltaod In! unatal £11.»... to:
1) ovuluntc turthnr tho dtucuncttc validity at tho pcooo‘uro. 3“

this study in,

by the administration

“to ”tum o: um «smug W1“ tom 1We
units: 3&amp;ttoat- with than; lhﬂ'! otlur
a)

ﬁg

Omnnﬂcustv.

putt-3t.

udltltlous t6

grunts.

lllllidt lonpltul v.39

lcloatod.

i£d vacantly rocutv.‘ olnatmoachoot trtatnnax or who v.90
alt-teal}: diaorinntoi tor. IIBII‘O‘a $11t1~tiﬁht satcrvltun U‘f.
0:33:06. night ytttauta twinned tho taut. thruc alumna innutttctou‘
who

�«i-

an
unattaiul “1mm. m m ”that m puny (Wham m
pro-um utmm. than; a to“; a! to nun“ m m: mm“);
“in“. I. “W m m and. u “but, tho 3““th «mam

iuhtsam
ta cltntail diucaoati. u1*&amp;auci ﬂout ttri caln$dtru£ $6 is?!
and 13 I»
mm
mutton.
nutptm
at
pm“

tum:

W“.
a.“ mum Inn 16» u.

«an

with a

“can at

:1

m

mn.

him and data; m taunts-anon a mu].
owl-taunt); a:
mm. «a ”that u: «and tutmumuy tar
”atom. at “luau. W muons an band on ”aim anor—
nuou at «mun ”km a! amtntnun n4 «aux ohm“ n
”tints um um. “um (42 (a) m m u sum:
laminae-1y

an truth? It: am you cm W? "on
mahmnutmpw Wimotymutm?

me

grammar?

1: your

mum
mutuapuu MM? ”iu'tmhmumuuv
mm but a m at!» man: at an W? M «It you an
this?
night? Int M W's «in? Int mill 1. ti“? “at ya: it
1- st?
u. n I!“ m
a! the
that “no

n It an" Inn put

«or ms In

“in"

a:

m

Am vi.“ ti. mtm Mt. tho ”$1.31! m and «udtuml mum to out“: turn“ mum: to: at um 01 5mm

0! "about: cat’s-«Mon:

I!
you

that 0!

n

m on“ haw Mu mu mt mu m ”at In? a»
39“?

m mu: mm an aim mum}: 1: a «mum at

«utum mm at a an a! 0.0! h at! mm”.
tho ”that m and to «on»
A. a.
manta“
I“
m
no: 109 to 1. m tumult us mum“ at“ no pun.“ am
up“ ”um a am: use an m “mu“. “m“. an“. as
cm" a: own“ mm“ m mun». nu. ma «sum

0.5 in 1. 10“. of

W“

�*3.

“amm- o: u. mum: «tau a: no a... no tout mt

injnotod anyondcd on tin apptsrnnno a! u naslnnl uxtcnt at tho trig.
In tut! atudy tan qﬁnntttr 311:3 rascal iron 0.! an to 0.5 03.
than tan phyulaloﬂianl nation .1 ti. drug was nunttosﬁ.
tic pgttoat In. xitcrvtvvud with t). nguo tartan o! quoutituﬂ. I! an
¢rror was main ﬁn. quanttnn.van rtpuutod aluodiutcly to actor-tn. its
parttatinaa. a;1y porutntant armor: Igru boon rngnvdod an tudtsattvo
u! truth dtuouou 31am. 3% hi. but: tound that tarsal auntrolu any unit
ttuamiant nintulou (1).
. Inhavtar

.

in» t9

.

13$: uttan

a:

.

rtcnc paticut. us I grow» ﬁlowud Inn, owurt tﬁdlaattanl a!
tour Iii Ctnﬁrtﬂt in tit tilt iitlutttu. fhti was shall. by tho titan
:nlbcr vb» 2633.06 tho tout nltogntlor. Son. iua&amp;cd ta calault that!
doctor: at tint: inntltan 1131:. watt. othsru war. tau frightenud to
.ﬁtﬂ? tho caantnattoa soon. 3"» 3.3:; than. via tcotilhu its: that!
unit nalbcraus naniloatnttonu at dintwuat. Savnrul ﬂirt raiuotaat at
1:. 401a - on. ﬂitting up throughout the cutaro procedurc. on. Gonna

illtll Utopia: all fact on tin 1100:.

ktuptlt that! than
tttaad. Inns patients tutti tor apoettta Gettilu a! tit tout - it:
’II’OIO, Ihlt drug thaw tut. ;n%tlug. why the: It?! uoln¢t0d. Ihnthnr
this II! a ”truth tant”. Ibuthor ti. results var. euniidnntlll and.
unusual}. vhnthnr that would 30 ta slut; at not hunt want ti.) Ilrt
nsgtuc. an. putaoat Into: 1: ho vIrQ '91-; to h. hillod. Aunthnr
3330‘ thtt : turn. be pruunnt. I... tatttntn ‘33ud an to potty-nu
and acvarul

tun granular. or 3‘1: "I abouldn't 5": ¢nnn.” than. u:a110ututtona
o: ovation sad tuapaeton vars haul an». marina than unto announsqrud
thin tun tout 1‘s tdiiﬂiutCtOd to putIQntu 1: stunts! Inu3ttnls. BIltkn pntiontu with phyttaul alsoasu: vim usuully 3:1: ti s "stat” a

st;tunnnt than:

Iﬂ‘tllt will or tnavta: It: houpttul.

thQﬂi puttonsg

�'T

ant: taro Uilhll autitda tn. tumullnta nttnsti‘g. Inch ll “tilt
:11 3‘: in tin IIIVirﬂO should 11'. in punau an: h:rnouy* tr ”good
intlth 1.! tin ntct unfit? II ”I; liﬂ‘ht‘t nhnuld ﬂirty a lion tollut.'
turthurunmt. titan vat &amp; [rcattr toxicity in tit: group in czar... tilt:

gnu.

distthXttnu in turns .1 aqua athnr pcraan :3 ”13!.Iiﬂht an: I but a
llxaht Iorvcuu trashinvn” OH “I, uni: trout}: in ny‘ugglagthtr.”
Alﬁhtthtta1_sndtuu.
1) lorntutcna gyrornz ﬁthttvo Innattona
11'! a! ti. ‘0 pattnust nhnuod pcruzatant ohms... of Io~
hgvtor stutlir co tin-c could in hrtlu ﬂaunt... it u IIU'IOII rarest
(l).puuattvu tauntinn: that gvnlud tron an» to soar plus anpculinc en
ti. lumbar at nuntloatuttoan a! itnursoattttoa nah 6.33:1 chain. on
tbtt 5.31.. tho lava pontttvo «use: 1: :81: study thou-d a an; plus
roasting. it. tout was rcpoutud tn turn: at those «:30: sud-nbolod a
ports-tuna: a! th. an. plan rauult in tun and n Ingnttvc ranalt 1n tho
thlrd. a: than: £11. putxnntn. turn: lhﬂlid «vidnnoc of hrtln taunts.
by athnr nothads oi atudy. Out. a haw 01 It. had a pauittvu Inoonhlnl
ﬁtnt (6). ti 33:09:51.356 toourd. sun nu titrated uptunl fluid protoil
on two Oﬂﬂhﬁtﬂll. Anetta: it! u «an. o: Paritnnantnn. r30 thtrt attuan psych-mun mu. mam: at tho
u. a
in: vus$ttvn an... had 0th.: ﬂiﬂll of br‘tn diﬁtllﬂ. an. In: t 64 run:
91‘ Inl‘vho porbtltontly tOIOWROd to ”Byﬂnahnl annpttnl" ‘hili ands!
tho inslumauo at tho drug. It had a nnrnnl BEG :34 no prouu-pttwu
Ovtdtiui a! brain dtloan¢. ﬁt. othtr puttnut loath4 1h; Ioaptt‘l ti
"auklaua.snrlﬁ altar h‘vtnc pinata it narroatlv in exam Oahu proav to
rtoutving tho drug. Tin ﬂaccid tautntntrttaon at tho toit in this has
'

,

m

,

.-‘

,

..

at»:

unvb n.3oust110

mum

litﬂltn

a) trgggtnut Irrorns
1r£anxcns array: (a.¢§

iVFORﬂ

'hiﬂh var: otthot $90.30

ulnouuly corrected or oowrnotod who: tn» ancatian nun iuuodttttly
rn’nntnd) tn cranniatlnn and :nurvaaas a: titans: haw. not bat: ra~

�ubm

mm u «W‘u u but; «an.

:3

ampmm: nun. .mm:Oriﬂﬂlﬂl

a! ti.
untowar. II
unaxrol.tﬁbsn¢tu (1). In the preaeat «tidy.

Icaad
nclttou. tin zlcilnnno in luv. hxvais b¢tn

aortas of

no

£3 19%

includod ¢$Viit tho luaorroct
puttomnn, or 33%. III» neat trworx. rant.
eats" au‘ *ﬂtyuhtntrtn Initituad'
ti"”l111l$dl
91:30
in.
Iﬂhlﬁl
than.
ﬁﬁ hunt or 1‘ a friend’s blunt ‘hn utult
hon:
tiring
ochlttulnt1:¢
tat
such I» "t plaoc to but. .0033.
boxorc. Ian. pustunau «nod cuphauttul
”a piaan t¢ tctah honlth to bank
rtcnpcrnttan,"
tar
"a
plan;
vu11.*
not
hospital with tun not: ntmaunduuu
panama.” ”u “Ilhtﬂ” tad “thy cronttst
drag char but simply
tut
rocctvin:
to
print
shnranu
I!!!
dilitrﬂ.”

mm

“at thy um “I 331th ”pittl.”

M ﬂan motion! m

Bivtﬂ.
rtponxtd. tunnvnr. tun arisinnl rampant. run anti:

tbs lacuna at third airman in rtuponun to
was Intod twist it lrcqummh
and
hospitaltnttion
i11n¢as
about
qunuttaun
booth. in» iﬂhaoct 0!
pinion
anothir
tuttrviov.
yrcudvuc
tin
1:
1: as
or stain. turalvod
tcttau
the
patterned
parucn
santhar
or
tbs statnan:
had dynaribuﬁ it:
tun
patio-t
prcvtauuxy
'hnr¢xa
exportnnoo
1: an
for huapttnltnutmu:
ayuntuun in it! first action. Tins til ratio:
Thu

‘

at. at

mm m mum
«umxu :19“ by an ”aunt u «z umhad”um
’
1
lowly
"mum.”
"the
mun.
in law In abused to
uobnll in tho mm mm
n:
«mud
m
m
“tun
am

m

Thu Qﬁﬂlll

drug tnlknd thaut a tritnd who htd onnaor.
0N0! ﬁlo htnlth a! tolnttvos. tho
aonauru
at
for:
tha
toot
trcqnoutly
vuuld
ohuugud to "t ui¢l that my
on:
tie!“
Invue
jut
“thnﬁ
t
Isak

tiaalrtac tho

ill

ntny unit.“ Thar.
"anth&amp;ac

mo

was

tare

Qt

1:32 but taut? and

eliahlitii an
?Iot tar yubllcntten.* that. in: tits

;.tondna¢y ta 0:919:

¥uun puttanss It.
stloattva spoctitatty in audit! to quantlaun.
for non. 111:..hanpttul
tho
ca
has
oust
tan:
that
said
had originally
doowtrs ha! tilt $hﬂl. Git“!
rtrllo‘ thtt tbs! had noun inaiuat tbttr

Iowa

�cxuupla
ﬁnalists guru that: Iﬁﬂltibt tn t not. ’Uﬂaiiﬂ way stuttn‘ tar
that tic: ivy. In ”t traatngut roe. lindins at! thc corridor."
in tho Lustunaa at tho
cryptic tilt!!! taro ocaasleually [1103 I!
could help :0 out thin
p;t1¢nt who. who: 13306 :0: a 11.». 3‘14 ":1 you

I with

you

3: you «call than I with you wasti‘.
Thiﬂi pattorna Iﬁft net aititrant 12am thus. used ﬂy

itnlau‘t.

ti!

tho tutti-or
patient: vtth-phynsnnl.tnaa'ooittcl that. dtnplnetntut to
Ind
atonnd yoxuau. gruntnr apoetliaity and .alnctzvonou: a: ruppoulu
at
tn¢rosaod use of aliahﬁi and ﬁltﬂﬂ tor. notud uadmr tbs tnfluttcc

tn. drug.
4» 12w.

In I311 pstttntn thﬂ rouyoano to thc rtﬂﬂﬂit in tall 3
prﬁbluu rulnttng
John doc-Id to-ba &amp; tribulia rupwosuntntson of nuns
inaction.
$0 illnous. houpttalinstion. tn: procedurc ttaclt or tint:
centidnrcdv
ﬁnial rolttxuns. 1h: aoutont at tats. rﬁiwﬁﬂﬂtl will bu

at “
hint.
rcpartud
b.
vtll
p&amp;t$ara
and
9.17
it.
papa:
Iipttttﬂ
udllutnn
53 pntiauts, 16 did not roapond cathnr hetero or ﬂaring dru;
4111£~
trutian. llovun pattcnt- aavvcr-d hyirntorrtn; ta thsir can
x!
:nltiua 1n tun {ﬁrst yuruon.uu¢h a. “:t would b. a spot int. I
anal
could no hunt? or “thy Join in my bctns but.." at: paﬁtuttn
adulntna
thin try: at purnaanl rctcronan both taint. gut dating tin
tr;tton $1 tun drug '31:. 11v: runpondnd tn thln~£aahtnn only titar
utructurdd
Alénottob. titrtrwtvo pattuats guru thn asunl turn at
an a

'

a: tilt third
303:. In theta. tho taaouax a! tin unttnn.ur umpnrtonn;
tritium: or
par-on :ppnutcd to nyutalauo not. :upnct a! £3. pnttnmt‘a
‘hau
nottvuttog. annuity pttzalas who rcupondod to tho «nosttoa a:
ch.
1133103 in tin primdntg antirvxcv unad tho ‘5‘; pattutn nitat
wail. ‘lfiﬂﬂliti
indaatxon. aovoa 01 than. patlnntn told tho I!IO John

It:

tovird
ﬂoat}
might
pattonta
problem.
th.
at
reprouontatton
u not. ulltgnrtcal

static: war. rolatod in

15

tantsaats. In?! tho tnaluley

: ”John” bum mum m» m m an aura ran. um: um“

"

�1 47“

2.13th

3)

Gianna. tualudod withﬁruuul, avarauttvtty. ultaruttouu.
u'pnnrunnn 91 unite er lixodrnuttta ”ladle” hohavtor.

an...

in loot uni

tit

it: Cruz.

th:

rulntud a story 011, with

Tvtlvu pataontn thaw-d Itil‘rllII rcaattous. Ia tho lﬂtlﬂll for. tho
puticut tuilod ca rosyend to any quantaonn tow ported: 13:11.. luau
novtrnl innntdn co halt II hour. In othnr anutnuaau tho quouttunn had

rntpnauo; tint. In: tn:ohorou‘
Innhltagi or analogiaua and tuna-plat. Icutcnunu Iﬂrﬂ ulna. At ﬁnch
tans. tin withdrawal sayqarcd t: to u solauttvu pruuocs s‘nuc tin
tu§d¢QIuto roupous¢ oocurrvd 9:133:11: with qn3;ttona rotating O0 tit
ptttont’u illnonu. what quatttoun a! u ﬁﬁ!‘ tuaoaunnn tﬂtﬂrﬁ via.

to

no rapdutna,novurnl

tin.» ta ﬁliait

int. or its. a!

n

tin pattnlt often unnuoraé
unwakly. «13:91: and aauplntcty. quknd Itthlrmlal in: not: unnuunl
control puxlontu ta ulnar:l hospitnln hut in: oaaurrod tttqucntly tn

taint.

such an tho

dag,

LI

patxcntn ittl hrt13.d1:0uno. Tb: patient: unto ovorlutivn aural. tho
303:. Inﬁnity tit: countutod 0d *hyttuta uncut-at: of tan baud. at»:
or Inna. a}. bliskiuu, a? v.9uxtod iﬁlﬁiﬂﬂ and adaasttt' at elatitla.
taunting: tho pttitnxu boos-n vary riitlaan. nut up in 5.6. sud Inliltti
on having a algnrottu. an. unison: sinned prolalcou uhtvurinc at It:
Uliil. bcdy tor nlvurll Iiiﬂlﬁﬂ. titular thuvud bthnvtnr vital roan
cabana ontntostc ponawtnc. uponttnaoualy balding an. urn in it: at!
law atvbrnl utuutou and thin holdtu. 1t 1: vnrtnu$ paitttain pliant by
tho Usualllr.

(stilts:

11%.?t‘tﬁll 1n toad taro nottd in 16 putlontu. it. pr.»
aunt‘s was an “uuptnrtc diruction, lithouch in its 0...: ‘DG

pgttuut itann. tanrlul sad Quartilud tawgra tun alone at tho 1n$¢rvtau.
Implawta in: slow: by tactanlod untltic, ﬂtltltit'or laughtng. 5ohuu|
Ind larvalﬂtalt a! vullabltlc. I... pitttttu Gauntltad thtt tho! KIII‘I
thoucbt tho! hut ”on. GU!!! ‘00 I031.“ ﬁhranotd attituinu In tattontod

�.3.

w tantalum

min mm mm and mm m mum at”.

utnclod~vith ouphnrta unntfoutattann. it»: on. pattuns, who till I!
:alt 330‘ and “vtuld 1110 than unto otttu.” antvmmtd quanta... with

such tzpwnanlauu us “that «a you tat-k it in. IE“ dealt-n 10.1” and
“not
boll ﬁﬂﬂl‘ 1 tauv.” Thu iactdnnoa :nn anuvau a! thil. oaptartc
ranutxoun was cougarghln tn than. pravtausly tau-d in both nor-n1

it.

«0.12.1 sad

ital:

dilussud cvuuva.

Vurvtng ingrown

a! suit. inhuviac var. Ihﬂiu, but

IOU.

ill

patxonln. In ntvbru1.oaaan this hohtvtur
it. until in tint! stunting baakaurd; Ihili tin drag It; 301:: imitatod.
I... vurtod in. tango o1 th¢ir oonattac. altnrnntcly ﬁlﬁ' sun 1.3:, at
tuna a tiuzwaanc rhythm. an. patient bartnd out tit IHIDUII it m

aaaoaiullr vauntntnt in

16

mm» mm“ um» mtm mwmam m wmntm :-

‘ollphonn aparttor annulus. ga. pntitnt rcopouaol tittaghnut tin
tstnrvtuv wit! nxxugnrntud nyllnbta unacnt gun druuutic pant... tn0$lr
ﬂﬂﬁ‘ ”triath“ oxproﬁntens Inch an "an. 1:. 1:.” low «In! uttsunro‘

mainly ma brought m: to m ward. platinum” um an in
in stgtt at tho ether pstiaats. out

Bitiltt,

who

actod in s art-nth:

tin taut. upongannaunly tauntini *1 li.‘
applause.” Inch ladle huha'tor is diffiuult to grad. stutlctlonlly
but it. In contra! not. ItrlOd thin 3:6 30.. abuarvtd in tin prtvtouuly
ntullol control Iron...
81: canon puttuntu ibﬂ'ﬂd saw. for. of ﬁlitrﬂd count; it»
hatter and»: In. anxlutncc at tho crux. thia raaaod tron tilting ch!
onnninug’u It‘d and Vbrhtl rauurln can: a: calling than “dust" to tho
huhuvtor or an. putlatt uh. triad to Etna ti. nunuiulr. A for atlnru
ratatou‘od It: Invoucnt: Ilcguatlvn at ﬁtuual activity at ynrtly-oa’0001
tin-n.1th in rattloul 10c Invclcntc.
gnu «nude unannr throughout

axncuasxal

the tumult: a! tin Itﬁﬂr gravid. :uritur duta ro'nrlilc

�.9-

"1““,

u imam tut far can «tum.

a
a! the prwodum
tho
at tho M
of aluminum: In“:

“at“.
mun: nu. chum a ﬂu.

the

”an“ mud ”yo-tun"

mo nu
um um Mint”
ma ‘W 1- “ti up: in an

«item 0!.
Malay Mum ”am“ of imam-gm or mama. «luau:
mu). «1’ ﬁlm: as may. :3 a ”cum “W a! ”you“:
”that: in a at“. butt“ (1). only an o! a. n a you on

“at

a! put-«tn without

m
M

manna“ for 8! ms, and n mitt" m1: 0! «a 31m.
is» I “an a: 1 «u ”out” m1“ u our no m1
mmh m n inseam. 01 m 1- m m ”cm“ with ma
“mu mm 1: ma «mu mmn. It my be 0.01““ an
nth it is with]; as! n ”that without mwu mm diam
to ”on I; ”out" mum. at “um ham “than with ma
a nutuuully Ituutmt.
“mu and «w
In that. a! m 11" um [um mitt” rm!“

W

W

um

"um 0! mm dam...umon patient

t”
In mum-um,
1n

1mm “warm I am“ cumulanu. an. u: an um. “mu” «- Wlmlmua am» 1.at
the mm «a $13013.
with. malt nu cm a on ”ﬂat
this study a ”11 u u m at tho ”than panama mac n a

man an «11.5.»: “um
A

“no mun who m cm to you: at an. uncut. «um: “mm
an have not ant to»
a no on.“ a: u- n the min a!tutthismm.”
mum In new
mum. It a with)...
to no than: u um am a tit m
1: on,»
mm. “I
not“ (7) m t.
a th- wart“. if imlﬁm
a! nun!
”in.“ with an“). “no m1“ «can! tut in g
0! ﬂu in“
Ilth ~mum1" Wm thin II! to m '1“!
«17 by tin ”pliant“ 0!
nun a: in
I“ m tam-nu tut
utm a: ommtm. a» “muby
and minus: (a)
Ll.
at ”mutual {mun
m min a! mu Manna» an autumn he ”any“ 1: wt a: th

W.
man

W cm

man“

new

m

W.W

W
Watt

�VF

.

«10~

"T

diacloottc Iﬂrknl’ or ;.ann$n1 hanpttgx.
1‘ annitdbriac tun nltatﬁtiuna in mytholis czprunatoa about:
by than. pltliitu it in noccuuary an raviiw you: grovioua ﬁttn t01n¢tll‘
mo tho Ianlsnlsuu a! luu;:tcntnttol for place tad ttloihnd 6.31:1
at
tllnnat. It hit but: 589*! tit: thouo phanouana 3!! an: 60:06:: Iaroain
I: nttrthutuhlo ta brill using. 1113!. runs; that tiny arc tun maﬁtfilu
rattan: or tut In“: or u :uaaiiennl 001.11%: rcprcn-ntod 1: I... tent
at tho brain, Thur arc. rtthnr. tor-a at ninytutton or ﬁotcnsn that
It. pntltut usnn in situations a: Itvcsa in n niltau of altcrcd luaral
inacttnn. In dxnurinututiau, ti. stanuuqd tine-at plan. in tha uylhtiaa
ruprcuontutxum or new; letifttiﬂl a¢_thn ynttunt. usually thst a! hdbu
GOItI¢ null and iota: homo ant a nanatoatntlou at 19:: a! unwary. That
it: gattnnt in apt to stttn a tint untoautiuc :1: 11130.33 to .11: tit
a... a: a small hospital at &amp; vixen that. hs'hn- but: far noun-tttvtnl
illnnia; ta least. tum hospital 33:: hit noun: at to uohxniulaxc tint
ha has 10:: the knapittl. In cltnet, the ytttans 1n oxygenatus his
1: mt»:
when puma. pinata: us than no no:
in that: «algxn‘l retornnttul aunuoxt but it vuhielsu tor in: exproslanl

WM
a: the

1W

muamva mu manta“. 1mm:

‘..

1mm at mu

{aunties in noeoasary to prnvid. can typo a: neural orgnnisttton in!
‘hn nuantonanee of this new synbolie synten the behavior 113.11 a: tin

tOtult a: tin tuturtntton or t numb.» at ttatort u vhtt 1331.! (I) It!
cull-d tn. orgnutuumvnviranmaat—ohﬁurvur euuplnx. wax: tualud0t not
«:1: tbs antral arznnt:at1an. but the ltct $1 tau disability ttucll.
tho putlogt'n untivltion ta b: I'll, tn. tnturpnrooatl tituttton a! $I.
intaxvicv. and the paticnt'a 11!. axpcriauct and parsoaaltty. tar
.i‘nplo. 1! tin interview in warriod out with utcrxli I;to: that. am.
In ch33... 8| lungsmtp. If tho oat-tun! docs not qunctten tho pttlaut
to limit: you to slap. haunt: with, “It!” man 1am my
what marital: ditteront rgnctinun ﬂldﬁr unytal madiuu bocxuuc ox
dittovunl typcu of puricn:lxty Ind uttstndua taunt! incapacity.

�-11canxrol pattantu mitt physlaul disabiltttoﬁ ain'toexskud
with hint: dlncauo. vita quittiunnd unﬁt: smrtni todtun. ‘law «he!
ulturuttana in lttcﬂlﬂﬂ. Tho: «a nut deny thuir tiﬂt’ﬁﬁltt‘i in qadnrw
13¢ ‘tluntaunl itniion nor an thug than luutl‘u diuortcatnttun tar plaeo
or tint. fin! to hau0Vtr. "Iinautcrnwwt" quantinns about illltui it!
an: 0! than ”oblon- ta mu 0! am»:
an. tuphnnlauc. humor. “1“. Ind «lights. I. n.prcriou- ntndy (3) 1t
in; potatud out that vita tun pattcat tuxrodumod nuathar ’Ofiﬂﬂ nttcr
toagtviac tin drug I. it. up: nnuoasartly ruvunltau that had htthgruo
Dana ”ro’wouaud” but yum oitlu clovosntng bin tuclluul 1a a nun

mm

mxulmtm.

”ml“ «mu».

who

um: 91

no

a: a. tuna“
m. m M
he

that in. ion: unployod. :ppaaru to h. thﬁt a! siting tin strong a!
ti. tuvsrnuncntnl attusttun tan or ultcrtna tit unurul orunltluttou in
first-h tit incllrould In! tho tansuilcd an. at tlnpttv. unehnatlli.
la prcvlonn studio. (3) (19). it kiwi itlealnoi its '13::ttotaut a! it. ctphorlu ‘sﬂ ludto bahnrtar tilt II Otttu notod 1%tt
unytnl cudtun. 1% it: pointed out thut tutu hihtvlﬂt «quid not to
intarptotud tiny}: in.Instantaal-phnyiolaui¢nl tart. ﬂint ta ”onrttcll
imprunstau” or as a ”rulounu at anhtbtttOH.” lhthur. tiny It. tynbol;¢
unit: at annptattau an it» unu-nrha1 upturn cougar-b1. to tho ammunitiant ahaaunc in vuriu: zanannuo. on» anuno‘ stat. that tic Gran Ithﬂﬂ
or an. annual. Inn ”than “11 John
putat- lm

mum

hdotnwt, but not

ti. ithctton vial: aﬁhsru do no ant: Its}. undnr
tum ﬁru‘. i‘éiclttuc that t titlur. par It to $011 u

sitar

thn titlioaoo at
got. don: not ruyruntnt *tnhlhtttun” vital 13 “rattan-i? ph1u1olnalaaIXI
by thu'drua. rattantn v.0. ‘nlnd to talk 33km. io¢;unn tn Iﬂlﬁl. tun
patina: alto: uaaroano: hit natal... not 1: a turutl ruxnrcatttl eonttxt
but in u u;ubolt¢ ptttqrs uttltxtns‘trnnstnas doatul. diturtOltattnn and
ittgla¢cnunt ta titties pﬁruon. raw uxtlpln. than nahgd why It can. to
the inupttnl u yuttnnt unciﬁl rcpt}. booaauo "I“: 1011.“ til at»:

tutad manta

no

I

Ina. night titan!

_

,
i

�”'er

«u-

""‘T

“Illluado aahnrotl“ I! h. porntstn in much rtnpouluu. 1‘ may to an
indianttou a! brutn diamana, but t: thy VQI’OII'I as. trniaitlt In!
ungrat‘lly $1 vuiiixn‘ by "ha, ha” tiny £90 annatdnrvd an JONDI. 0i!
Vﬂlhﬂ anarcusod not telling. ahaut tun honyitn1.vhurt in! but tenacity
hat: a puttnnt by votorrtnc ta 1: 3; ”Int: 3311.” in than! attunﬁtani
thy patxtnt x: utilising 1h» man. at th- houyltul at g nynbalia Action
for tho rcyrosoltttanu o! ht: prabltnn.
Thouu.pst1ontn, in thutr rnipoasuu to tho pracn‘uvu I’DOI'~
:0 to rtnoiblo tn; normal group in he». reagents thnu that :sa tho
group with hvaxn dullﬂb.

thiy

416 not dxrnatly dun: tun cssntauno»o¢

problonn an: did tho! show lnattnu pattornu of disortan‘utton. tin
Iyubaliu avionics air. of tin nan. typo atcd hr tho mortal Illu'.

tho: did an. tn... houovdr. t¢ a grants! Court. as ovidsauu‘ Ir it.
1313.: nutter of trnalltat after; in ortcgtatton and ¢strauauu a!
tllnnua. tar: lads: hahnvtar and much not. unriayenntVtaaan Ind.utth~

drnunl. Tics. rusponscs. «ouplcd with chucrvutlan o! thn intatnaactn
to: hohuvtar, nuggtntu that tho total situation cantata. III. I‘lﬂiin
tul Iﬁttﬁrﬂﬂh than 3!. ¢n¢ouaturaa thin tho taat ts “.06 with ’attalsu
in a gunnrtl hospital.

:

�W.
W“.

‘0‘. I“ “it. In!
("My“) mtw)
In“

’o‘o. It... ‘9‘“.
“midi... o:
3.41m
Lunatic
m
1-0.:
3.
Mama.
”max...

mun:

1o

a
0.:
LJ.
I. “mun.LA... an.thoI.L.. tutu-n.
m
an”.
You“
ct
tar
”Aura
man
an:
manna»
W:and um.
LBJ.
him.
its
mt.
m1.
m
11: 3:1th
$11-$28, mu. mud:
3. «man. LA. and an“. 5.:
in swu- Win
A...
J. puma».
(”m1
Mia").
mm
u.

wt»:

a.“
| 9m.

.

max.

W

W“.

a!
3.5. m m. 3.1“:
«man.
1.
1m.
m*. Mind I“ “with” “3 "'9
8. luau“. SJ. «1 an. id“: attun- at atom-mutton
”am. J. mm“. m 6113. m1... 1:
6.

a:

'

‘

”at“
3. arm. a...
I. and um. $3.: I» mm tutu
m.
a!
Egg-mun an erg-nu In“: W.lom1m.m«-u.
‘

g

c

MI... mu. mu... tum. Add mm“ an
mm.
M ammo-9mm“ “uranium 1. m1
autumn
10.
of
and
I m.
on
um
Wu
many-«Mm
mum
3.1.: MW meat“: 1- the u“.
I ”I
Linn.
LIA. not. lam}. ad mun... It: 613-881.. nu.
ﬁnial». Au can» Luann. human. mm c. W,
10. "mun. LA... ma. LL. and
. l»: mu ”no:
3: “cm.
with It“: Mum. 3. It In“ mung.
1.

m

”that:

LMWW
‘r

�Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Volume IV

January, 1955

Number 1

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2414">
                <text>The “Amytal test" in patients with mental illness. Journal of the Hillside Hospital., 4: 3-13, 1955.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2415">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2416">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-15-019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2417">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2418">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Weinstein, Edwin A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2419">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2420">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2421">
                <text>[Preprint] and Reprint. Reprint from Journal of the Hillside Hospital, Volume IV, January, 1955, Number 1.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2422">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2423">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74444">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81005">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87566">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94127">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="228" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="19">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/945d2769d3cde3d546dfd13ec8bc4c04.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7b68d01261bda3dea9d45000fea060a8</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100645">
                    <text>The F ace—Hand Test as

a Diagnostic

Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome
Max Fin/c, M.D.,
Martin Green, [M.D. and [Morris B. Bender, M.D.

In the course of sensory studies by the method of double simultaneous
stimulation, it has been observed that patients with mental changes may
show perceptual errors which are not demonstrable by routine single

stimulation.1 When stimuli are simultaneously applied to the cheek and
the hand (the face-hand testz) , patients frequently report only one of
the two stimuli, or when reporting the two stimuli mislocalize one to
another part of the body or even into space. These changes in perception
are seen on repeated trials of the face-hand test and seem to form a con—
sistent part of the syndrome usually labelled “organic mental syndrome”
or “organic psychosis.”
SUBJECTS

Four hundred patients, who manifested cerebral dysfunction in the
form of an organic mental syndrome due to a variety of causes, were
studied on the wards of the Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital.* Each patient
manifested, to some degree, the following mental changes: (1) impairment
of memory, for both recent and remote events; (2) confusion and disorien—
tation for time, space, situation and body image; (3) errors on calculation
and general information tests; (4) distractibility, poor attention span, inability to handle more than one situation at a time, concreteness and
*This number represents several series of patients in whom the method of double simultaneous
stimulation were applied. It includes all tests of the face and hand by touch, pin prick and
combinations of touch and pin prick stimuli, as well as tests of body areas other than the face
and the hand.

From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of Medi—
cine, and the department of neurology and
psychiatry, Bellevue Hospital, New York City.
This work was aided in part by a Fellowship
from the National Foundation for Infantile

Paralysis, and by a research grant from the
United States Public Health Service, National
Institutes of Health.
Read at the second biennial meeting of the
American Academy of Neurology, Virginia
Beach, Virginia, April 11, 1951.

46

�4'7

ORGANIC MENTAL SYNDROIVIE

rigidity in thinking; (5) perseveration of speech and behavior; (6) emo—
tional liability and readily elicited “catastrophic” reaction; (7) loss of
initiative and interest in the environment and indecent exposure and soiling of the clothing. The clinical diagnoses were varied, including chronic
alcoholism, post-traumatic encephalopathy, hypertensive cerebro-vascular
disease, diffuse arteriosclerotic softening, syphilis of the central nervous
system and degenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Hunting—
ton’s chorea or senility.
Observations on the face-hand test in patients with organic brain
disease were compared with previously obtained results of similar examinations in normal adults and children and in adult patients with
schizophrenia”. The normal adults and children, including students,
associates and patients in clinics, were without manifest disorder of the
nervous system. The schizophrenic adults were patients from the wards
of the Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital. No effort was made to group the
patients into the various clinical types of schizophrenia.
JMETHOD

The face—hand test was applied to each of these subjects. During
routine physical examination the patient was asked to close his eyes.
One cheek and the contralateral hand were simultaneously touched or
stroked by the examiner’s ﬁngers. The patient was then asked what he
had felt. The usual response was, “You touched me here,” while pointing
to the cheek. After this initial application of the face-hand test, the
patient was again asked to close his eyes and the contralateral cheek
and hand were similarly stimulated. In the many instances when only
one percept was reported, the patient was asked if he had felt anything
else. Occasionally the second percept was reported after this question,
but more often it was not. Thereafter the tests were applied to the face
and hand and to other parts of the body.
RESULTS

In patients with the organic mental syndrome most responses to the
initial and subsequent face-hand tests were of four types: (1) a touch on the
cheek only, implying no sensation in the hand; (2) a touch on each cheek,
implying a mislocalization or displacement of the percept evoked in the
hand to the cheek; (3) a touch on the hand only, implying no sensation in
the cheek; and (4) correct localization of the percepts evoked in the cheek
and hand. Less frequently other responses were noted, as both percepts
in the hand, or a percept in the cheek and homolateral hand implying
a mislocalization from one hand to the opposite hand. In a few cases the

�NE UROLOGY

4-8

percept in the hand was mislocalized to a part of the body upon which the
hand was resting, out into space, or onto the examiner’s body.
The following case illustrates the various responses of patients with
an organic mental syndrome.
Case

admitted to the psychiatric hospital with a one
year history of progressive difﬁculty in concentration, inability to continue work, mood
disturbances, episodes of confusion, forgetfulness and occasional lapses into irrelevant
speech. Later, following the death of his wife, he became depressed, cried frequently,
and spent many hours talking to himself.
The neurologic examination showed minimal right facial weakness and some
gross tremors of the hands. On psychiatric examination the patient answered questions coherently and relevantly. He was euphoric and friendly. There was disorientation
for time and place, his memory for both recent and remote events was poor, and
confabulation was frequent. Calculation and general information tests were performed
poorly. Judgment was poor and there was no insight into his difﬁculties. When left
alone he carried on a conversation with himself, and when presented with a mirror
he identiﬁed the image as that of his brother and conversed with the image, listening
for replies and reporting them to the examiner. In addition, there were difﬁculties
in expression, both verbal and written, with errors in reading, calculation and reporting
numbers. He was able to carry out simple commands but made errors in imitating
mouth and hand movements. He handled objects clumsily. There was right-left dis—
orientation, and he made errors in naming body parts.
Psychometric examination revealed a severe organic impairment with defects in
memory, concentration, abstraction, and concrete verbalization. His performance on the
Kohs block test was severely deﬁcient, exhibiting ability to complete only the ﬁrst two
1:——-A

60 year old man was

ﬁgures.

,

0n sensory examination by the method of single stimulation he could identify
and localize pin prick and touch stimuli, except that stimuli applied to the left hand
TABLE
Stimulus

Right cheek, left hand
Left cheek, right hand
Right cheek, right hand
Left Cheek, left hand
Right and left hand
Right and left cheek
Right cheek, left shoulder
Left cheek, right shoulder
Left foot, right hand
Left hand, right foot
Right and left hand
Right cheek, right hand
Left cheek, left hand
Right and left cheek
Right cheek, left hand
Left cheek, right hand

1

Response

Right and left cheek
Right and left cheek
Right cheek, right shoulder (P)
Left cheek only
Correct
Correct
Right and left cheek
Left cheek, left shoulder
Left foot, left hand
Right and left foot
Out into space*
Two percepts right cheek
Left cheek only
Correct
Right and left cheek
Right and left cheek

Type of Defect
Displacement
Displacement
Displacement
Extinction
Displacement
Displacement-allesthesia
Displacement-allesthesia
Displacement
Exosomesthesia
Displacement
Extinction
Displacement
Displacement

*Patient mislocalized these percepts into space, insisting that the stimulation had not been applied

to his body.

�49

ORG/1N1C .MENTAL SYNDROME

were occasionally displaced to the shoulder or the face on the same side. There were
no signiﬁcant differences in temperature, Vibration, position sense, and two-point
discrimination tests on the two sides of the body. Stereognosis was intact. Examinations by the method of double simultaneous stimulation elicited many defects in
cutaneous perception. These were manifest by extinction and displacement of percepts.
The errors were persistent despite numerous examinations and over many weeks of
study. Table 1 is an extract from the record of the patient’s responses to touch stimula-

tion.

Similar errors in localization of percepts were found when continuous and
repetitive pin prick, tuning fork and temperature tube stimulations were used. 0n
simultaneous stimulation of the cheek and any other region of the body, the patient
correctly localized the percept in the face but seldom perceived correctly, or at all, the
other stimulus. This was particularly evident when the cheek and hand were tested,
especially a cheek and contralateral hand.
A pneumoencephalogram revealed symmetrically dilated ventricles without displacement. A biopsy of brain tissue removed from the right cerebral hemisphere disclosed a prominence of senile plaques, Alzheimer cells and fatty pigmentation of
neurons.
COMMENT

In this case there was no question as to the clinical diagnosis. The
is
of
in
defects
not surprising. It is signiﬁcant that
perception
presence
despite the severity of the mental dysfunction the alterations in perception were consistent and patterned. Even though the patient appeared
confused he never made errors in perception and localization of stimuli
on the face, whereas he frequently erred in the simultaneously stimulated
hand. Extinction and displacements from the hand were frequent during
many examinations. These perceptual errors were conspicuous by their
consistency, orderliness and predictability against a background of apparent mental confusion. These changes can be considered a prominent
sign in the organic mental syndrome.
DISCUSSION

Incidence of errors on the face-hand test: Of 156 patients with organic
mental syndrome, 91 per cent made errors on the initial trial of the
face-hand test using touch stimuli. Subsequent trials revealed a similar
high incidence of errors. These errors were in a deﬁnite pattern, in which
the face percepts were correctly localized, and the hand percepts either
not perceived or mislocalized. Displacement of percepts from the hand
to the cheek was a prominent feature during the initial few trials of the
test. Errors were noted on both sides of the body and occurred on tests
applied to cheek and hand on the same side of the body, or on opposite
sides. In 87 per cent of the patients errors were apparent through the
tenth trial of the test and persisted for many more trials. Repeated testing

�NE UROLOGY

50

I

100

~ ‘~_
60 O
RESPONSES

0*.\

Responses of normal children ages 3-6

DOMINANT

Responses of schizophrenic patients

FACE

CENT

PER

1

2

3

4
NUMBER

FIG. 1. Responses on

5

6

or successnve

'7

8

9

TRIALS

gm

multiple trials of the face—hand test to touch stimuli:.

on subsequent days elicited similar errors. It must be emphasized that
these patients were able to correctly identify and localize single stimuli
applied to the face and hands.
In signiﬁcant contrast to these observations on patients with organic
mental syndrome are the observations on normal and schizophrenic
adults.2 On the initial trial of the face- hand test to touch stimuli,
'75
of
normal
and
the
adults
cent
per cent of the schizophrenic adults
per
failed to report one of the two stimuli. As the test was reapplied, the
percentage of error rapidly declined until by the tenth trial of the facehand test less than 0.5 per cent of the normal adults and less than 3 per
cent of the schizophrenic adults still showed omissions or mislocaliza—
tions of percepts (ﬁgure 1). However, examination of children, age
three to six years, with this method again showed a very high incidence
of defects on face-hand tests. The curve of responses, as noted in ﬁgure 1,
is parallel to the curve of responses of the patients with organic mental
syndrome. The errors persisted for many trials and were observed in
testing over many days. In older children, the curve of responses ap—
proached that of the normal adult.
A number of factors were found to inﬂuence these responses. Such
elements as the type of stimulus, the conditions of the test, the part of

�51

()RGA N10 i1! ENTAL SYNDROME

the body stimulated, “set” and “attention” of the patient, the type and
severity of the mental changes, and the effect of drugs were considered.
Timing and type of stimulus: In previous studies on normal and
schizophrenic adults,2 simultaneity, similarity and equality in strength
of stimuli were emphasized as essential for eliciting these responses. In
the patients with mental changes, however, these factors were not as
prominent since stimuli of unequal intensity or of different modalities
still elicited errors in the tests. Dissimilar stimuli, as application of a
touch stimulus to the cheek and a pin prick stimulus to the hand, or
stimuli of unequal intensity, as a light touch to the cheek and forceful
rubbing in the hand, elicited extinction and displacement of percepts.
Similarly, errors in localization were elicited even if stimuli were not
simultaneous, i.e. followed one another with a lapse of a moment or
two. As previously reported, these errors on unequal, or dissimilar stimu—
lation were not seen in the normal or schizophrenic controls.
Application of the face—hand test using pin prick stimuli elicited the
same pattern of responses as with touch stimuli. Eighty per cent of the
patients made errors on the initial trial and such errors persisted in 60
of
incidence
is
This
defects
trials.
for
than
ten
lower,
cent
more
per
however, than in the series with touch stimulations (table 2). In some
of these patients it was possible to alternate touch and pin prick stimuli,
and observe extinction and displacement of the touch percepts alternating
with correct responses to pin prick stimuli. In a number of the more
severely affected patients, extinction and displacement of percepts were
also apparent on tests with temperature tubes, tuning forks and repetitive
rubbing stimulations.
TABLE

2

INITIAL TRIAL

Organic Mental
Syndrome

Normal Adult
Schizophrenic
Adult

Modality
Touch
Pin Prick
Touch
Pin Prick
Touch
Pin Prick

Hand or
Face Only Face-Face Hand-Hand

Total

Correct

156
50
160
68

15
10

122
35

7’7

75
15
45

’72

50

51

24
36

13

14

5

3
3
2

2

1

2

0

1

5

0

This factor of the type of stimulus was more prominent in the normal
and schizophrenic subjects. Less than 30 per cent of these made errors
on the initial trial with pin prick stimuli, and the number of errors declined rapidly until by the tenth trial none of the normal subjects and
only one of the schizophrenic subjects still showed errors.

�NEUROLOGY

of cutaneous stimuli between various body parts was apparent.
lation of dissimilar body areas with the face as one locus, the
the cheeks were well localized and identiﬁed, while stimuli
were either not perceived or poorly localized. Combinations

SQ

On stimu—

stimuli to
elsewhere
of stimuli
to the face and trunk, face and foot, face and hand, etc., repeatedly showed
face dominance. In contrast, in tests with the hand as one locus, the hand
percept was always poorly perceived and poorly localized. This was
observed in the initial trials in the normal and schizophrenic adults, but
was more apparent in multiple trials in patients with organic mental
changes. By repeatedly testing various combinations of other body areas,
a gradient of the sensory relationships of these areas has been established.
Because the face and hand regions represented the extremes in the
pattern of responses, these two regions were selected as the basis of
most of the tests. Therefore, this method of examination was named
the face-hand test.
The errors in these examinations were apparent in tests of both
sides of the body without any manifest preference. In patients with hemiplegia of recent onset and associated mental changes, extinction and
displacement of percepts were apparent bilaterally, but were more prominent and more persistent on the involved side of the body. In patients
with long-standing hemiplegia in whom the mental syndrome was no
longer apparent, the defects were limited to the involved half side of the
body?
The factor of mental set: The mental set or attitude often inﬂuenced
the perceptual response. Once the normal adult was examined by the
method of double simultaneous stimulation, subsequent tests failed to
elicit a repetition of the errors which occurred on the initial face—hand
test. It was as if these subjects had “learned” the set of “two-ness.”
Moreover, when normal subjects were tested with face-face stimuli, the
responses were correct, and then all subsequent face-hand tests were also
correct. When face-face tests were interposed among trials of the face—
hand test in the patients with mental changes, they continued to make
errors on tests of face and hand, even though they were correct on the
face-face trial. Such errors persisted for days. Evidently mental set and
learning did not alter the pattern of response.
The factoq' of attention: It is well known that attention can inﬂuence
4
perception.2' In a series of 30 normal adults who were told that two
stimuli were to be applied, none made errors on the initial trial of the
face-hand test. However, patients with severe mental changes, who were

�53

ORGANIC MENTAL SYNDROME

told either before the initial trial or on subsequent trials that there would
be two stimuli, still showed extinction and displacement of percepts. It
was possible to have the patient, with eyes open, observe the application
of two stimuli and report them correctly. Then, with eyes closed, and the
stimuli applied to the same or homologous areas, the patient would report
the stimuli incorrectly.
The effect of fatigue on the performance of the patient has already
been mentioned. It is possible to increase the errors of the patient by
administering the stimuli more frequently, or by making him aware
of his errors and thereby increasing his anxiety. With mounting anxiety,
errors increase until culminated by a catastrophic reaction and withdrawal from the examination. A similar effect of anxiety on performance
was manifest in the normal subjects. The adults with manifest severe
anxiety required more trials of the face—hand test to perceive the percepts
correctly than adults without manifest anxiety.
Degree of mental changes: We found a deﬁnite relationship between
the severity of the mental changes and the frequency of errors in perception in the patients with an organic mental syndrome. The patients
varied in their mental status from mild memory disturbances and alteration in intellectual ability, to severe psychomotor retardation, amnesia,
aphasia and somnolence. The responses to the face-hand test varied
from occasional extinction of percepts seen in the mild cases, to con—
sistent, bilateral displacement of percepts to other parts of the body,
the examiner’s body, or into space in the subjects more severely affected.
In a number of patients with severe head trauma or following cerebral
in
mental functioning was acthe
improvement
progressive
surgery,
companied by a change in response to repeated trials of the face-hand
test. The responses changed from bilateral displacement and allesthesia
when damage was most severe, to extinction in decreasing frequency
and ﬁnally consistently correct responses as the subject improved.
Perceptual errors were greatest in subjects in whom nervous system
dysfunction was acute in its course with rapid onset and short duration.
Patients with severe head trauma, infections of the nervous system,
vascular accidents and neoplasms were more likely to show extensive
changes on double simultaneous stimulation than patients with chronic
alcoholism or senility. It was in these last two groups that there were a
number of subjects with organic mental changes who consistently per—
ceived the two stimuli of the face—hand test correctly on the initial and on
multiple trials.
Type of mental defect: There was no obvious correlation of the freface—hand
with
of
in
of
the
the
single
test
errors
symptom
any
quency

�NEUROLOGY

54

organic mental syndrome as in patterns of thinking, spatial or body
orientation, memory or calculation. Errors in perception were most apparent when disturbances in function were most widespread.
A good correlation existed, however, between the patient’s alertness
and the responses on the face-hand test. In patients who were apathetic
or lethargic, errors on double simultaneous stimulation were most promi—
nent. This was apparent in many subjects who made errors occasionally
during the initial trials of the face-hand test, but in Whom errors became more frequent and changed from extinction to displacement responses as the examination continued. Similarly, in testing patients with
ﬂuctuating states of consciousness, there was a good correlation between
the degree of alertness and the responses on multiple trials of the face—
hand test.
Some of the patients were unable to carry out tasks which had two
different aspects. But despite this inability to do two things at once they
were able to perceive the two stimuli applied to the sides of the face.
Therefore, it could not be said that the inability to correctly perceive one
of the two stimuli applied to the face and hand was due to a defect in the
ability to perform a task with two different components.
The factor of aphasia: Aphasia is sometimes considered a defect in
mentation. Such a defect, Where severe or associated with mental changes
characteristic of the organic mental syndrome, yields a picture of the pa—
tient as confused. For instance, a patient with aphasia may also have a
loss of memory and an inability to recall or recognize situations even after
they are described to him. In order to determine whether aphasia per se
will produce errors in the, face-hand test, aphasic patients, with or
without such mental changes, were studied. Patients with aphasia but
without mental changes did not make errors on the face—hand test, while
patients with aphasia and mental changes made repeated and consistent
errors on multiple trials of the test (ﬁgure 1) .
Organic mental syndrome with normal responses on the face-hand
test: As already noted, not all patients with an organic mental syndrome
make errors in tests by the method of double simultaneous stimulation. In
a series of 271 patients in whom various combinations of these tests were
applied, there were 228 patients who made errors and 43 patients who
gave correct responses on initial trials. Of these latter, however, there were
22 who made errors after the initial trial. The remaining 21 were correct
throughout multiple trials. Of the 228 patients who made errors on the
initial trial there were 28 who were subsequently correct and yielded
responses similar to the normal as carried out in one series of tests. In
of
found
49
it
the 271 patients with mental changes
that
was
summary,

�55

ORGANIC MENTAL SYNDROME

yielded normal reactions. All of these 49 patients had an organic mental
syndrome but in general the mental changes were not severe. lVIemory
loss was spotty and the degree of orientation varied, Apathy was seldom
marked. There were fluctuations in performances. At times there were
long intervals, minutes to hours, during which the patient showed no
apparent mental changes. Examinations during those symptom—free intervals showed the face—hand test to be normal. In several instances it was
learned that the defects in memory or indifference in answering questions
pertaining to orientation were‘due to an emotional depression or to a
phlegmatic premorbid personality. Their organic mental syndrome was
only apparent and not real. There were, however, 11 patients with severe
mental changes who reported correct responses on repeated face—hand
tests.
Eﬂect of drugs: From the foregoing studies it is clear that patients with
organic mental syndrome make errors in perception in double simul—
taneous stimulation tests. Consequently it was thought that the mental
changes induced by drugs should yield similar errors. To test this theory,
normal adults were subjected to intravenous injections of 7 to 10 ml. of a
5 per cent solution of sodium Amytal administered slowly. This drug
produced the usual nystagmus, dysarthric speech and drowsiness. In addi—
tion, normal adults, who made no errors on the face—hand test prior to
the injection, now made consistent bilateral errors. Within 5 minutes
after the injection errors were apparent on many repeated trials of the
test and these persisted during the period the drug action was effective.
The more drowsy or intoxicated the subject became the greater the tend—
ency to make errors in perception. At the onset, displacements of hand
percepts were frequent, but as the drug effect diminished, displacements
diminished and extinction of hand percepts became prominent—only to
disappear as the subject became more alert. Similar effects have been
observed in the patients with a mild mental syndrome. Where only extinction of hand percepts was apparent prior to the Amytal injection, displacement of percepts became frequent and persisted for the duration of
the examination. The effect of the drug persisted for longer periods in
patients with organic mental changes than in normal adults, so that
displacement of percepts was manifest hours after the injection in the
patient group.
Similar observations on the effect of anesthetics on central nervous
system function have been made in a study of normal adults subjected
to varying periods of anesthesia.5 These subjects with no demonstrable
disease of the brain, who made no errors on double simultaneous stimulation tests prior to anesthesia, manifested extinction and displacement of

�NEUROLOGY

56

percepts in either hand on multiple trials of the face-hand test during
recovery from anesthesia. When these subjects regained consciousness
from a general anesthetic, they were disoriented and confused. There
was a manifest correlation between the duration of the perceptual errors
and the period of confusion, lethargy and apathy that followed the anes—
thetic administration.
Eﬂeet of convulsions: During post—convulsive states patients frequently show confusion and other symptoms of the organic mental syndrome.
Since persistent errors on the face—hand test were found in patients with
mental changes due to disease of the brain or due to drug intoxication, it
was thought that any one who has an organic mental syndrome, of whatever cause, should show these errors. F or this reason, groups of patients
were studied in whom convulsion were induced electrically for treatment
of depressions. Patients who were given intravenous barbiturate prelimi—
nary to electric stimulation were not included in this group.
It was found that if the post-convulsive confusional state was severe,
these patients showed a high incidence of errors on the face-hand test. As
soon as the confusional state cleared, the incidence of errors in the facehand test decreased.
Value of the face—hand test as a diagnostic sign: In order to determine
the value of the face-hand test as a diagnostic sign of severe mental
changes, a series of patients were examined in the admission ward of Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital. This examination was carried out by simultaneous stimulation of the face and hand. Each patient was given a series
of 10 tests. N 0 history was taken nor were other clues used to make a
diagnosis. Using this method it was found that in all cases in which the
face—hand test showed errors on repeated trials, subsequent psychiatric
examinations disclosed the presence of an organic mental syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS

From the foregoing observations it is apparent that subjects with the
organic mental syndrome showed persistent errors on face—hand tests. It is
signiﬁcant, however, that the same confused and disoriented patients did
not err in a haphazard fashion. An analysis of their responses based on
numerous tests showed that the errors were made in a predictable pattern.
There were consistent errors in the hand percepts, whereas there were
very few errors in response to the simultaneous stimulations applied to the
face. Another signiﬁcant point is that this pattern was found not only in
patients with cerebral dysfunction, whether it was due to structural or
chemical changes in the brain, but also in normal children. This was found
in children in whom the brain was not altered in any manner. The latter

�57

,

ORGANIC MENTAL SYNDROME

observation indicates that this pattern is not the result of disease of the
brain, and conversely, that it is inherently organized. Moreover, it indicates that this pattern is acquired early in life.
N o explanation is offered as to why these patterns are so organized,
namely, face dominance and hand “extinction.” The rostral dominance
theory proposed by Cohn6 cannot be supported by these observations, inasmuch as it was found that the foot dominates over the hand. This fact
automatically precludes the factor of rostral dominance. Moreover, the
authors do not wish to agree or disagree with the well known theories
proposed by Goldstein.7
Still another point is that reactions of the child are similar to those
of the senile individual with mental changes. One might draw an analogy
to the Babinski sign, which is considered normal in the developing infant
and abnormal in the adult. From this analogy, it might be inferred that
the presence of persistent errors on the face-hand test in the adult indicates a regression to the infantile level. However, we do not wish to convey
the idea that we concur with such a theory.
Finally, it might be concluded that what is seen in patients with dis—
ease are normal patterns of function which appear to be grossly exag—
gerated. As noted, repeated errors on face-hand tests may be found in the
normal adult under certain conditions, particularly when there is altered
brain function. Based on this hypothesis it is felt that a good deal of information about normal function can be obtained from patients with
dysfunction as a result of altered structure.
Aside from the theoretical considerations it must be concluded that
the face—hand test has clinical value. It is a diagnostic sign of the organic
mental syndrome. The persistence of errors on face-hand tests in an
adult strongly suggest an organic mental syndrome.
SUMMARY

Patients with an organic mental syndrome make persistent errors in
tests by double simultaneous stimulation of the face and hand. The errors
are usually made in the hand. These errors are made on multiple trials of
the face—hand test and on subsequent examinations on repeated days. The
normal and the schizophrenic adults, however, do not make persistent
errors. This difference in response between these groups is so striking
as to have diagnostic value.
Errors of extinction and / or displacement on multiple trials of the facehand test by touch stimulation are indicative of the organic mental
syndrome. In a series of patients examined in the admitting room of the
Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital, these tests were applied to patients as the

�NEUROLOGY

58

ﬁrst questions of the interview. The diagnosis of an organic mental syn—
drome was conﬁrmed by subsequent interview in every case. The significance of these ﬁndings is discussed.
REFERENCES
1.

(a) BENDER, M. B., and NATHANSON, M.:
Patterns in allesthesia and their relation
to disorder of body scheme and other
sensory phenomena, Arch. Neural. &amp;

Psychiat. 642501, 1950.
(b) BENDE‘R, M. B., and WORTIS, S. B.; Patterns in perceptual, motor and intellectual functions in organic brain disease, Tr. Am. Neural. A. 72:31. 1947.
(C) BENDER, M. B.; WORTIS, S. B., and
CRAMER, J,: Organic mental syndrome
with phenomena of extinction and allesthesia. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat.
59:273. 1948.
(d) BENDER, M. B.; SHAPIRO, M. F., and
TEUBER, H. L.: Allesthesia and disorder
of the body scheme, Tr. Am. Neural. A.
73:170, 1948.
(e) SHAPIRO, M. F.; TEUBER, H. L., and
BENDER. M. B.; Disturbance of body
image and allesthesia. J. New. &amp; illent.
Dis. 108:253, 1948.
(0 BENDER, M. B.; SHAPIRO, M. F., and
TEUBER, H. L.: Allesthesia and disturbance of the body scheme, Arch. Neural.

10

.

.

&amp; Psychiat. 62:222. 1949.
BENDER. M. B.; FINK, M.,

and GREEN,
M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand, Tr. Am.
Neural. A. 75:250, 1950.
(b) BENDER, M. B.; FINK, M., and GREEN,
M.: Patterns in perception on simultaneous tests of face and hand, Arch.
Neural. &amp;: Psychiat, 66:35.5, 1951.
BENDER, M. B.; SHAPIRO. M. F., and SCHAPPELL, A. W.: Extinction phenomenon in hemiplegia, Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat. 62:717.
(a)

1949.

The phenomenon of tactile
inattention with special reference to parietal
lesions, Brain 72:538. 1949.
5. JAFFE. J., and BENDER, M. B.; Perceptual
patterns following general anesthesia. J.
Neurol.. Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat.. in press.
. COHN, K.: On certain aspects of the sensory
organization of the human brain: 11. A
study of rostral dominance in children,
Neurology 1:119, 1951.
GOLDSTEIN, K.: The Organism. New York,
American Book Co., 1939.
4. CRITCHLEY, M.:

In order to conceive a clear idea of the pathology, we have only
to imagine the physiological phenomena, already noticed, assuming
a pathological character. Now, the force of these phenomena may
be augmented, diminished, or annihilated.
In regard to the cerebral functions, we have, in the sentient
nerves, pains or insensibility; in the cerebrum itself erroneous perceptions, judgments, and colitions, or delirium; or a total deﬁciency
of these faculties, or come; in the motor nerves continual voluntary
actions; or paralysis.

Hall in Lectures on the Nervous
System and Its Dis-eases, published in 1876.

-——Marshall

�The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic
Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome
31am

Fink, M .D., 111a7'tin Green», M.D., and NI 0772's B. B ender, M.D.

Reprinted from January—February 1952 (Vol. 2, N0.

1)

Issue of NEUROLOGY

�NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY

The 116th Regular Meeting oI the Society
WILL BE HELD AT THE

BELLEVUE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
LEWIS I. SHARP. M.D.. Direcior
30”! STREET AND FIRST AVENUE

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 9th, 1950
AT 8:30 P.M.

PROGRAMME
I. TWELVE YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY ON METRAZOL
TREATED CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENT SCHIZOPHRENICS
.

LAURETTA BENDER.

MD. and

S’raff

2. THE FACE-HAND TEST IN ORGANIC MENTAL DISEASE
M. FINK, M.D..

MORRIS

B.

M. GREEN. MD.

BENDER.

and

M.D.

NOLAN D. C. LEWIS. M.D.

MORRIS HERMAN. M.D.

Prosideni

Secrefary

Staff invited

—

Dr. Herman

�4/,q/,

.

(0‘

‘Pv

mmmmnsnmucmm

Newman.
h
an m. w..-

W m. 1.9.
m I.rmm.
and

61w

ICU

47%“

V

21*...‘1977i/w’177

M;
~

M

«magnum-rm
I“
MW”.
human
mum 9mm.» mun

coir;

wa
«m
nun-u.

”W77 .2: 4L5:J' fflzﬂ.)

.

r,

Inn.

.

mu a»

III

(mag.

mIn M(
at»...
mu.
mmm

61”.

m»

um
mMum muumo of man.

��put-W0
W.
m
WW.W«WW.W
WWImmumuth-mxmmm
um mu mam-a

mu

W.Mnmmm.
“mun
MW“ mm minty.or

mumummmtumnunnmu

www.m«mmmummuu
mmmumnwmummuumt
mmmu-umm
umumWﬂ).
mumymmatumauﬁn.mm

‘

sum-.muumuumuuaum. aha-ow.

mummmmmmamummmm
mam nmmmummnmumm

mummwmumummu.
‘

mmmmpmmmuummuntmm»
01mm“. mmummmuummm
m.
mmumwomnmmunm.
unntmmummtnmnu. sun-mm
m‘yummmm.”mumm. mm
wmmnumuumnmmt.mmmmm
«muuxmmmmmmmummumm

nwmmmmuiymm
www.mmmwuumnumom.
mmmmmtmwmmmum
Ntmmumm. mmmummuuu
“mum-mm.

mmummuommotmm.

�3.

“cummumumuumemmo

wwwmmwmwmmu
mdtmwmn (C).Mﬂmwmgmmﬂ

Manama-m; (h)uMnmm.mmunm.

zuumumnmpmtumpmqwmmmm

tomm3(a)utmﬂmmm.mmuumm

umm.umammnuuuummm
umMu-mm. WMWMWMM

lm.ummuuwm.uumonnmmm
mummm-mmunnummum
mouth”. unmm‘mmtuwmmuu
awwamummmmmmmmm._

www.cmummum.
mmuunummmm.

Wu¢unmmmmmmmuhum
mmm-wmumnmmmmamn
to mm M. not
may
Wt: In emu-u.
or
«a mus-an:

ovum 0mm tan-Waumm.
um.roumummtuotm
WWWtW.
m.mmw.mumm.mmcmm

“mun-Ion.

Gamma-lo
mammmumm.
mum «may «my.
WM you.“

w
“pm-.mwmwmmmuMva-unw
ﬂu

Ind

ammonium. Mmmuuutwtm

�����W:

mu. Mummy.
ammummnwumuMnr-Wu
mmomxmmm nmnumuuumm
own”

(a) In

m1 M

w.m.mmmmmupwmtmm

«wwwwummmmnmum
mum. mmm.umnmmotum-m

«Immuammwnmmumm.wumxa

mummuuummummmmm
awn-ac. omsmmuummmamu.

Min-1:, man in “annual: an annual

m 1: am an

Momm.1.c..tmm”mwnthnmuI
mutton... upmAmuW.Mmu-nmaw

nguummtmuuoWu-Wc
mmu.'

muuuﬁawmmmmmumx
cunzm'mmutmumuuam-m. um
wwammwmmwmwmmm
mmmuwrwmmmm. m4mm
«muuw.m.mummusum.m
um(mx). nmumumummmu
.

ummummtm.ummuam
Mwummmummnuwm
“stamina-an. namummmmw
ammauumwumummw
«mmuwm.mrmumuuwm
mmumwammmwm
mama-Woman». mmmwmm

mummwumnmmmum.mmmw

�mummmxwmmummdmm

mummaummawm

mm.

mamt

M

mu» W
,.

mMat
m
nu met
'

'

Pin

ﬂat-I1

“a“

mm
91:: Wk

m

“Magnum

:55:

:3

160

E

.a

‘

m

m
35

36

W
a W
;
ma

3

3

3

t13

0l

I1

8

uM

15

at

51:

an:

.

m
mummmumnnumonmmu
21.;

:.:!..,;:

A:

4

&lt;41"

:1.

.,;;,,3

'

‘

”“1

nnmummummumamumuuum
Imp-mummy.» mummuuummwm'
,umeumxmgmmumMn-ﬁun

www.m-msoummumm
mmwmuxmm. emumuumuuwm

mm.mmm.mmm,mummwm
mm:.mmnutumumm.m
W.
mwmmpmuwmmmum.

mummmwmmummuum
www.mmmwammumaumu
dam-mum. nmmmunmmnun-ummmnmyummum
mount-«mm
ammmmm.
wmwmmmmnmamn
«mmmmummumumm.

9.

�mgnmmmummmwmt.
umummummwmmua

10.

'

mmummuumtwmtpmym

muuWMﬂ'umtm-ﬂmmmmm

”.mttmmﬂMofWI-NW
mm.htmmmﬁuﬂmmmmm
mandate-«mm. zap-umumam-nmm.
mammmm~~l~nvmmm
mummmummmwmumwm.

mmxmwnumm
momma-alumnus

Win-WW
wumWamomum-mm.
Wcmumnunatnmuuuwmmm
“ml-12m
Mummmwmt.
mmu'm'm‘mmu'mﬂ W.“
WWmmmnwtm-th.mm
.

‘

www.mmmmmmmmtummo

W.'mm~mmummmmmmuw
tut in tho unam- at: mm M. M «an»:
«mmmmuar\m'mm.mwmm
mtummum. Mmmmmws

W

'WWm'm'm'mmummpum-t
‘m till} «man an
of 30 m1 mu was
Mum mm: (2.”. In a
man mtmasmnmunmuu. noun-gamma
mmwwumwmm nmmuumnmm
;..

‘

.‘

It 1. i011

m

mu. m,mm'wuwmmmmmnmn

v"

���am.émmégmmummmm
«mummnmunomumrmm

13.

mumumeuom-yutmmwm.
mmmn.atmxummnwwmmm‘
utmmmmumn,mmmmmuum
nun-«mm. Wanna-.itnauaothmthum
_

munwucubumnMnmwmm-mmu
”mummmuamtmmmnwumtmeu

mummmamu.
Winn-am“ MQMNG,MIm.wmuum
um am.
nummmmuqum-om
new : mm m mt nun-mm.“ m- am.
umuammmomcnamwmmmmmw
“M’umummmmWL-ommu
m. umuammmu.mmmzm
mm in ”I {W mt.
«mm
puma,
muumme.
www.msw.
«thmmmammmmmmmm;
mumumwmmmmwmmm
Q/F’7”
at
am.may»
m m,
am
or

a

than. aphasia

‘

.

with or

W
mamw,mmumummmomm
an

(of. Figure I)

mummmuwmmaammm
0W.
mnmummuummmom
umﬂMMmmmMmmumu-mm

mm.mbsmmmwmm,muum.

�15a

“mmmu,mmmmnmtm.mtum

mummmuwumuumm
mums-ﬁammmmmumm
«nun-mun. mmmnmmmm
um
mummmummmm
M.W¢MMMW.utum-m
www.mwwmmmumum
mwmumuwummm
mam. mmmmmumumuuu
.uuu-umm. mmmmummum
ammmumwmuummamu

ququa-mmuwmu
mantuumwthmmmumun
mom.xm’mummmumummt

«Wuwmmmmumnm

Wmunummemm'mmu
mmmummmasswummu.
mm‘
mummumts).
“mummdmmuMmm-nu

mMmanumm.mu
W.uwumuuwmumm

m.
Wummmmmmmu.
mmmuWMWrmnnu-uazmm»
mmmummmu'mme
m.mumwmsmlmmm

���18.

mm.uumhomwwtmtmmmnm
uuMmMMQthamuu
mum-ma. um.mmmum~mm

wumummmngmmum.
Monm-

mmmuummm
Wanna-unmammwwmumnumw

Wmummnmuamumuuum:
“titanium.

Ma
m
umnmwumm ”Mormon
umm-m

“tum-mun».

nuns-mm

13"

nuance-nu.

_Mmmum‘WWmmm
'W.

m mutant mm
“WI-shim
tau-aw mmmummummmm
“mummy-ammo” Momma-um
mmmemmmnwmgm
MMMNW¢NM.W.
«mm
downs-mm Momma-mom
Manta Int

«ummm
“mun
mu!
umWWVMuWuva-am

«mummy-mu

‘

namwmumnm
WWW
thMdWWWMOMm.Mtc-um
mumummcm
wW W
Me
m:
M
mm” a am out,
of In

w

!:*

{

i
‘

a

.

�.

1...}

hilt

[,....VMLL..FED|II'

.

.

y

p.

.

‘

.

‘

I.EEERIEKV=5¥I

1

ll...

.

b
w

.

,.,.,..VHA|I,EELLELEtELVFIVIillrilill&gt;il

fit:

..

‘

.

:33:

.00

mac:

.50

mmmmw

a

.&lt;
63:08..“

.3
Jun—“Suv—

z.

.l..|||lli.,r

5::

.EE\

liKiff

,

uv..mmn

'

|

.muwooEm—zg

.L

‘

‘

L

E!!i:ll.’yw

A

/

:1

E.

E!

.m

.
A

mo&lt;5

�’W

amount

11

1‘.“ to

on

may» run. a: the moon“

ma “mu.

'

mm
in: normal 0mm
(x—é—x) at
«W
of an. 3.6 (0—0), mm m1:- (0+m0).
”mum“ uncut: (x—h—x) m magne- lulu
”mu name me mm mm (rm-I).
*

In. mama or

W

patzlcntl

sun emu.

���i/‘l/B

I
STANDARBIQATION

OF THE FACE-HAND TEST

Introduction:
In previous studies a simple perceptual test, the

test,

race-hand

test

was

introduced and the responses to the

of normal subjects and of patient with psychiatric

disorders were described in detail (1~6).

sists

The

test

con-

of applying touch or pinprick stimuli simultaneously

to the face and hand while the subject's eyes are kept
closed.

The

subject is then asked

localize the percepts.
occur.

The two

stimuli

correctly or the subject
and

Two

felt

and

to

general types of response

may be
may

what was

perceived and localized

perceive only one stimulus

either not perceive the other

(phenomena of

extinction)

or misloceliae the second stimulus (phencmens of displacement)

(7).

Most

often the mislocslisstion or displacement

occurs to another part or the subject's body but occasionally

there is displacement into extrspersonsl space or onto
the examiner (exosomesthesis) (8).

Displacement of stimuli

�2.
across the mldllno of the body (alleatheala) is another
form of displaoomont
Normal

adults

initial trials
orrots

that

may show

of the

among

occur (9).

errors in perception

teat. characteristically

of face dominance).

all subjects correctly

-

be

those

is perceivod correctly
As

correct

(phen-

additional tests are

tho errors disappear so that by the.tenth

to

on the

oonaiot of extinction of the stimulus on the hnhd

wheroao the face stimulus
-

may

done

trial noarly

porcolvo both stimuli and continue

0o subsoQuent

trials.

has been tarmod a ”negatlvo faoe~hand

This type of response

test."

lt

oocura

not only with normal gdulto but also in patients wito
nohlzophronla, depression, or oovoro anxiety{
In contrast to the preceding groups, patient

tith'

an organic mental tyhoromo show extinction‘and diaplaoef

want not only during the

initial trials

or the ‘tost but

’

after

10

total:

of testing or as long on testing is

continued. Such a rooponse is termed a ”positive taco—hand

�3f

test.”
-by

A

normal

"positite fees-hand test“ is also manifested
ohildren, normal aged persons.

fectives asvwell as
syndrmhe.

by

patients with

and mental de-

an organic mental

~

Because of the

differentiel_response or these several

groups of subjects, the face-hand

test

has become

useful

clinically in detecting the presence of organic brain
disease. During the course of our studies, however,

it

hes been noted thst patients with an organic mental syndrone vary

'

greatly in the type and frequency of peroeptuel

errors. Also, subjects without organic brain disease

‘

occasionally manifest a positive faoefhend test.

The

questions thieh arose from these observations are: 1) Is

it
.

poeeiole to classify or standardize the different types

of errons ooeuring in subjects with e positive race-hand

test?

3

2) Gen

these different types of response he corb

related with the several groups or subjects previously
mentioned?; 3) In there e type of response which can be

�llld to

ooour absolutely only

in notiente with eeyere

4

dieeeee of the brain? 'The present study ie an attempt

to enerer these questions.‘

~

“

‘

.

lethod end Resultez.
We

test

reviewed our previous records of the face-hand

done

in almost

syndrome, normal

1000

adulte,

patients with organic mental
and

schizophrenia adults, as

well an in lesser numbere~of normal children, normal aged

persons, and subjects with mental defioienoy, depression
or severe anxiety. Additional groups or some of theee

subjects

were

aleoteeted in

different types of stimuli.

e systematic manner with
The

criteria ueed‘to

form-

ulate a standardization of the race-hand test were:

1)

‘type of perceptual errorx'a) frequency or the variOue

type: or error: with different types of stimuli (touch,
rubbing, scratching, or pinprick);
quency of

errors

when

3)

effect

on

the fre~

the Subject ere-witnesses the applio'

cation of the stimuli (factor of attention). Fifteen to

thirty trials
'

or the

test

were

usually done for each

eubjeet.

�5.
Based on theoe

criteria,

it

was

possible to divide

oeticnte showing a poeitive race-hand test into four
groups.

The

oheracterietio reeponeee for each group are
V

'

in Teble I.

summarized

Qheee reeponeee with examples

are described more fully in the following peregraphe.

mm

I

Features of the Different Type: of
Positive Face-Hand Test
\

One-glue

Extinction
only with

,

a

touch stimuli,

Two-Blue

Three—glue

Extinction

Extinction

~pinprick

placement with
touch, rubbing

with touch,
rubbing, and

and deep

~

stimuli

die-

and pinprick
’stimull

Four-Rina
Same as
three-plus
with at
least one or
the following

feeturoe:
e) exosomeetheeie
b) alleetheeie

c) frequent

pereervetion

d) occurrence of

errors while

subject eye—
witnesses the
areas stim-

ulated.

One~Plue Face-ﬁend
show

These

Test:

errors only of extinction

The

subjecte in this gnoup~

and not of

displacement.

errors occur only with touch stimuli.

When

pinprick

�6.

in need, both stimuli are perceived correctly, although

errors will again uppeer

when

touch stimuli are reintro-

duoed.
A

6h

year old

because of a

1%

men

with mild diabetes was admitted

year history or difficulty in walking.

For at leeet the same period of time the patient had
been depressed,
The

elept

and

ate poorly. and

wee

impotent.

only neurological finding was a elow, heeitent,

shuffling gait. There
vascular dieeaee.
payohomotor
was

The

peripheral

patient appeared depressed.

showed

retardation, and cried readily. Senecrium

intact. Spinal fluid,

eere normal.
The

was no evidence of

The

EEG,

and

X—reya

of the spine

diagnoeie wee involutional psychosis.

gait difficultiea

were thought

to be secondary to the

depression.

this patient
hand

test.

A

shoeed a onesplue response on the raoe~

sample of

his response: rollove:

�7.

'

com

stinging
touch: right chcokolort hand' right cheek
touch loft chock—right hand
touch right check—right hand
'“touch loft chockwlcft hand
touch right check-loft chock
touch right hand-loft hand
touch right chock—loft hand
touch lelt chock-right hand
touch loft check-right hand

'

left

cheek

right cheek

left

cheek

T222

of Error

extinction
extinction
oxtinction
extinction

correct
correct

right

chock‘

extinction

correct
correct

touch right check-right hand 'right cheek
touch left chock—loft hand
left cheek

extinction
extinction

pinprick right chock—left hand correct
pinprick loft chock-right hand oorncct
pinprick right chook-right_hand correct
pinprick loft chock-left hand corrcct
touch right cheek-loft hand
correct
touch loft check~right hand
loft chock

extinction

'

adamant:

Although

this type

patients with cerebral disease,

it

Or

response occurs in

is not

alwaya charac{'5 w (M

.

[cal/ca
toriatic for this group. It is also seen in caciiihf
defrlswod’ a; MAJ (as: t/(O‘ﬁli‘d 4"/ Mo, ﬁtter (a! amt/11:5 Skits}
.(achizophrcnia, and, occasionalgy,

in normal adults.

�8.
Two-Plus Paoe~ﬁand Test: In

this

group

extinction

'

occurs with pinpriok and rubbing stimuli as well as with
These errors.may be

touch stimuli.

just as frequent

with both types of etimhli or may be more conspicuous
with touch than

sith pinpriok

is not present, but

or rubbing.

may ooour on an

A.72 year old man had a 5 weeks
and

Displacement

occasional

trial.

history of mental.

behavioral changes. This. consisted of disorientation,

confused behavior, and internittent autism.

thero

was an

examination

organic mental syndrome characterized by

partial disorientation, defects in recent
and oiroumlooutions

illnoss,

On

in answering questions, denial of

and pain asymbolia.

logical disabilities.
l-raye were normal.

memory, evasione

The
A

There were no other neuro~

spinal fluid,

and

EEG,

pneumoenoephalogram showed

skull
diffuse

,oerebral atrophy.
This patient's responses on the face-hand

characterise the two-plus type or response.

A

test
sample

�of these responses followc:
Stimulﬁs
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch
touch

lett

cheek~right hand

right cheek-left hand
left chock-left hand
right cheek—right hand

right chookéleft

cheek

right hund~1ert hand
touch right cheek~left hand

I

.

Roseanne

ngo of Error

left

extinction
extinction
extinction
extinction

cheek

right cheek

left

cheek

right cheek
correct
correct
right cheek

pinpriok left cheek-right hand left cheek
pinpriok right cheek-left hand oorrect’
pinprick loft cheek~lort hand left.choek
pinpriok right cheek-right hand right cheek
pinprick left cheek-right hand left cheek
Gonncnt:

extinction.
extinction
extinction

,

extinction
extinction

This roaponco occurs most often in patientcv

with cerebral disease although patients with anxiety state,
I

depression or schizophrenia

may

also exhibit

it. It is

not seen in normal adults.
Three-Plus Paco—Hand Test:

This group is characterised

by the Occurrence of displacement as well as

with both touch and pinprick stimuli.

The

extinction

frequency of

�10;

extinction

and displaoomont may be aqual

or unequal and,

likewise, the number of errors with touch and pinprick
otimuli will be variable.
A

57 year old chronic alcoholic was found in the

in a stuporous condition.

Hia

Itroot.

breath had an alcoholic

odor and there oas a laceration over his right foroooad.
There here no

hospitol

focal neurological signs. During the

doy the

patient graduolly

Spooch woo rambling and
was

was

and

skull

had savoro memory defects

There were no
X~ru§a were

ﬁalluoinationsti'

nofonl.

The

diagnosis

ocuto and chronic alcoholism with deterioration;
A

hand

fluid

And

35‘

expressed taranoid ideas aod was

He

hoatilo'hnd asaﬁultivo.
ISpihal

fully oooacioualgii.

at timeo almost incoherent!

oomplotoly‘diooriontod

with confahulation.

become

first

sample of

this pationt'a

toot, indicative of

fallout:

responooa on the

race-

a throe—plgo rooponao. in go

‘

�114‘

szg

Rcaponso

Stimulus

of Error

right chcck~left hand right chock-left hand displacement
touch loft check~right hand right hand—left hand displacement
touch right cheek-right hand right cheek
extinction

Touch

touch
touch

loft
loft

cheokﬁloft hand

Correct

cheekoright hand.

left

chock

extinction

touch right chock-loft hand right check—left check diaplacomont
touch right hand-left hand .correct
pinprick right chock~1c£t hand‘ right-choek-lcft chock displccomcnt
pinprikk loft chock-right hand loft chock-right cheek displacement
‘

pinprick right chock—right hand right cheek
left check
pinprlck left chock-loft hand
FourvPlus Facc~Hand Test:

extinction
cxtincticn

This group shows the.

sovercat porcoptual errors. In addition to frequent

extinction

and displaccment ac scan

group. one or
.

all

in the threc~pluc

of the following phononcna

may be

sccn'

with touch andﬁlr pinprick stimuli: 1) oxoaomcsthesia;
2)

allcsthosic;

3)

frequent pcrservation of responses;

h) the occurrence of perceptual

errors even while the

subject keeps his apes open and eye witnesses tho arcas'
stimulated.

�12.

A

60

year old

man had a

oriéntation, torgetfulness,
examination he

ShOﬁBd a

three year history of

interest.

and loan of

On

sovare organic mantal syndrome

manifested by cemplete digorientation. marked
-d6fect3, and inability to calculate.

'oodperativo.

d18~

He was

mamary

alert

There were no other neurological

Spinal fluid and skull x-raya were normal.

EEG

and

signs.'
showed

modernta, diffuse biaynohronoua slaving with slow alpha.
A

diffuse curcbral atrophy.

pneumoogoephalograg disclosed
A

sample of the

patient's roaponsee; 1ndlogt1ng a'

fqur-plua face-hand tagt, is as fellows:
Stimulus
touch right cheek~

left hand
touch left cheek»
hand

right aheek
sonal spaco~

,

v‘

right.oheok

oxosomosthaaia

extinction

,

_

oheek—
lart
left hand

10ft hand

extinction

,

touch

touch right hand-

‘

left-hhook-oxtrlporu

,

touch right cheekhand

.

,

right

right

‘,

‘

of Errér

Tzﬁo

Haazonse

right cheek
,

oorrhot

perseveration
'

'

�13.

touch right ohook-

right chook~loft

left hand
touch left oheok¢
hand

right
pinpriok right
hand

loft

ohook-

loft

right hand
'pinpriok right cheek- right

right

hand

pinpriok loft

’lort

hand

loft

chaok—

pinpriok (eyes open)

right cheek-left
adamant:

hand

cheek—loft hand

right ohook-lott

left

pinpriok loft chaak~

ohook

ohook

allosthosia
displaoomont

extinction

_

cheek~oxtrnporaonnl
apnoo

displacement

extinction

cheek

oxoaomeathosia

right cheek—extrAporaonal oxosomosthoain
space

Throo~plua and four-plus responses invariably

indicate disoaae of the brain.
normal

chock

They are never found 1o

adult: or in patients with psychiatric disorders.

In oddition to tho difforont groups of subject: diaounsod above, the responses of normal children above

fears 0! ago, normal
hove

ngod

also been studiod.

3

persons, and montal defectives
The

distribution or the responses,

or the children and aged poraooa are related moinly to
age.

The

youngest children and the oldest adults show

threo-plus and four—plus reopensoa.

With changes in

�age away from thine extremes, one-plus and two~plus

re-

spouses become more frequent. or the subjects with mentel

deficiency, those with

ﬁho

lowest mental age have throe-

plua and four—plus responses while one-plus and two-plus
in subjects with higher mental 33035
'neoponses predominate
Table II summarizes the distribution or the four

different tfpes of responsesamong the various groups of
subjects.
ShOﬂ

Only

three-plus

may be

patients with
and

four-plus roséonses._ Such responses

considered diagnostic of an organic mental syndrbme.
TABLE

‘

an organic mental
syndrome

I;

Frequency of One-Plus to Four~P1us Positive
Pacerﬁend Test in Different Groups of Subjects

Negative

Ono~

F5H.test Pius

organio nental Syndrome 10%
7%
1%
Normal Adults (below 60’ 99%
year: or age)
“yachixophrenio Adults nearly noooae-

Two~

Plan

Patients with anxiety nearly occae~
states
all ionelly
Petients with paycho~ neerly
genie depression

all‘

Four~

Plus

Plue_

25%

335-

o

o

'

25%

o

_

'

'

all ionally

Three»

rare neVer never
more

never never

�15;-

Discussion:
In answer to the questions raised in the intreduetlon,
our results indicate that four general types of positibe

Itsce-hsnd test occur and that these different types can
be

correlated with different groups of subjests (Table

Our

attentien

there

was a

was

ii).

focused mainly on the question of whether

type sf response which occurred only in pamienss

with severe disease of the brain. All cases with a threeplus or foursplus response have organic brain disease.
Suoh'responses are never seen in nermel adults or patients-

Iith

psychoaenic disorders, even theugh these groups

occasionally

show one~plus

may

or two-plus responses.

Patients with oerehral disease manifesting s four~
plus response invsrihbly

show

vsneed foam or mental changes.

the severest or most adOtherwise there is no

correlations between the type.n! positive faoeahand
test and the severity of she senserisl defense. Same

good

istients

with severe mental changes may have only a twenplus

�»

response; In addition,

10%

of patieoie with an ofganio

mental syndrome hove a negative face~hand

ereelized that the use of
‘fov the groups

16.

teet.’ It is

to four ~plus nomenclature

a one

implies an increasing degree of cerebral
‘.

-dyafunntion. This nomenclature

‘

was used

because of con(1

lenience and much an implication is not intended;

.

We?

This classification of a positiieﬁface-haod should
‘

be

useful clinically.

In feeting neurological patients,

the exect type of positive face-hand
-corded,
was

will

test

should be re-

rather than the deeignetion "the taceuhend test

positive" as has been
make

it

easier to

of politiﬁe faoe«hand

done

until

now;

Judge whether the

Such a prooeedure

particular type

test manifested; indieatee definite

cerebral disease or whethef‘it

may

not be a mnnifestatioh

of anxiety or depression.‘ The use or such a classification

will also

make

it

easier to

compare the response of

patients

at different times during their illnees. In addition.
.

,

it

should be valuable in clinical experimental work,'euoh an
the reopen-e or patients to drugs. eleetroehock trentmont; ate.

�17o

Ema

1“,? :

.A

stanﬁardization of the
dittorgnt

face-hand responses is prgsented.

A

ﬁypea of

positive

one-pins face—hand

that consists of gxﬁinotion only with'touoh stimuli.
Itwo~plus

reapgnsg 1a charactﬁgixéd by

A

extinction with

pinprick and rubbing gtimﬁix,‘gs.wéll as with touéh stim-

uli?

A

three~plu3xfesponés consists cf extinction plus

diapﬁacaﬁont with touch, rubbing, #nd pinprick stimuli.
A

four—plus rggpénso has

all

tha charactériatics of a
‘

é

three-plus rgaponsa

and

in addition at least one of tbs

following features: a) exo§bmeathesia; b)_allesthesia;.
c) pérseveration of respongea;'d) occurrenoa of
evbn while the

errors

subject aypeyitneéaas tha Aﬁﬁlication of

fha stimuli. ‘Three—plﬁs éﬁdttour«plua responses invaritbly
M-rindictte_¢1aeaaé of Fhé braig.

One-plus and two~plua

rdaponaea ocgur in patient; with brain disease but are

alab maniteated by a hmélllﬁumber of normal alulta and
.

patients with psychogenic disorders. Pationts with

a;

r

�183

four-plus response

the Invarest mental changes but

show

otherwise there is no correlation betwoon-tho aovopgyy'
of the montql changes and the
.

7-

test manifested.

-

.

face-handV.‘
typo-of'politivo
(J
’

"

.

,

'w

L

�19.

REFERENCES

1.

BENDER,

u.a.,

PINK;

3. and

GREEN,

n. - Puttarnn 1n

paﬁcegtiun on simultawawus ﬁesta a: face and hand.
Arch.Neurol.&amp;Pq1chiat., ﬁg: 355—362, September, 1951.

2.

M.B., and PINK, M. ~ Tactile perceptual tests
in the differential diagnosis or psychiatric
disorders.
J.Hillaido 3032., A: 21-31, Jlnunry, 1952.

3.

FINK, M., GREEN, M., and BENDER, M.B.

BENDER,

tastNo.an dia'noatlo
1,

‘g:

h'ar8,

- The raoa4hand

Sign or disease or the
Jan~Feb., 1952.

brain. Nburolo

.

FINE, H. and

BENDER, M.B. - Dovelopmunt of perception
9f simultaneous tnctile'stimull in normal children.
2 27-3L, January,
Neurolo
1953.

JAFFE, J. and BENDER, M.B. ~ Barceptual patterns fol—
lowing general anesthesia. J.Nouro.Neurosurg.&amp;Psychiat.,
gg: 316-321, Hovombor, 1951.

and

BENDER, M.B. ~ Cutaneous perception
in the aged. Aroh.Neurol.&amp;ngphint. ﬁg: 577. 1953.
g. BENDER, ﬂ.B. - The phenomenon of sensory displacement.
GREEN, M.A.

,Armh.Neurol.&amp;Pq;oh1at., 95: 607-621 May. 1951.

8. SHAPIRO,.M.F., PINK, m. and BENDER, v.3. ~ Exosomesthesia
or displacement of cutaneous sensation into extruporsonnl
space. Aroh.Rouvol.8:Psgchi-.at.,

9.

gag: 1.81-1.93,

Oct. 1952.

Patterns in allasthosia
body scheme 3:: other
g4: 501~515,
Arch.Neurol.&amp;Pa;chiat.,
aensorysphohamena.
Oct. 19 2.
BENDER,

and

M.B. and NATHANSON, H.

—

their relaticu ta disorder or

3

�3?}!DAMIM’1'IM

63‘

m FAW $33!?

a,

mu: 1. Green, 3.
'

n.

end

m ﬂak, “e at

«mu (m. unit m m hum hun«tion at Melanie hardy“: (m. omen;
are. the he
at at hmlag at the umt 81nd nupitd
mad the 31

statue

m1“ heath

1“ Megan}...

�human:
m wim cm» owl. 9;".le tut. m tam»W «at, In: untamed and 8h mum» a: mi ijﬂiuj
.

.

an

m6 6: pinata“ with

«m1 (hm... m

I

”yum-mu gamma

m :3an
at pup-1a:

an amt“: or mum mu

”m: swim» to aim m. and mm um. um mhjuuu

an nu «Elma. m mm 1! mg: and £o¢uu1hu and

.

i

1m

Imus. an ”my“. ad mm”). km; of Hum-M mm;
m We «mu my by manna and 1:00.11.an a‘amauy. or.
a» mild.“ any pun-«in only can “mm: and um:- mh para«1» m an)” (Warn, of mutation) a:- 11:10am" it»
or “wanna” (7). lo“ mm
«com! “1mm!
W “almanaum or
«am ﬁn “who: M at
m “mun: m. but «gutmmy m» u “mums auto
utmycnml and. ar on» tho 0mm” {unmsmltﬂ (‘8).
of «mu gums. tho gumm- o!’ m had: my.»
anlmt
than) my the cum (9).»
new mom show um 11: ”reunion an tho mun:
trim a: m rue-hum an. mutant-visually than cm“

(mm

«ng:

,

‘

in?

‘

'

m1» a: titanium at m. «Mm:

to:

an hm! worth an

(Wm

at an ammno. «mm: 5.: pandwd dame-1:1:
muh M that mu m npch’w 0mm many-w no that
by m mm ﬁrm. marl: All munch alarm“: ”was." both
“mm and than 00mm m but own“ on tum-«mm man.
m. in. of mm. m but: hand a “no-nun
int.“
«am not only with 2mm). adult: but an a: punch“
1%.

1'in

�3.

‘riih

I¢b1iayhm¢n1ug dnpmunl1un.-ov 11'111 1nx1tty.

m

«mtmt to

m panama magnum, pathnu mu m

i-orsun1o 3.11:1 aynérhln aha! 1:11101111 and d1splaaolnn1

1:11:

ton 111.1: or 11¢11n¢_av at long a; 1.31115 13 uon11nuod. 3111
a ruspumno 1u‘1gauud 1 "911111 1 tuaouhand 1111.” A "91111111
rnut~huui 10.1” 1: alun‘nnn1rbaeod by annual «h1ldrun, nay-a1

laid

W. «a 1mm.

10100111“.

31151:. 1: 1h; d1££buon1111 9.19011. 1! 1ha1o sewirnll
~grouya at 31111113. 1h. flatuhmud‘1nut has bacon. 111911 111nm
11.117 1n 6010011ng 1h» pwaacnac a: orgnn1a 11111 111.11..
naming 1h. «aura. at our 1111101. hawthr. 11 ha: haen gotta
1hu1 pa11cn10 111h 1a avainlo nan1tl aynévano vary gron1ly 1n
1h. typo and truqunnax at 9011111111 111111., 11:1, auhjnatl
withaut «waania 11111 11:11.. uccnﬁxon111y'nna1tun1 1 91111111
tqaodhund 1.11. an. 11.51111: Ib1dh aria. tram 1hnao 11101111109»
'12:: 1} In 11 9111111. 11 11:10123 1r utnaﬂardino 11: d1rfurun1
1ypoo at 11:11: 10111111: an 11150011 i11h pauittv. rto¢~hnna
1
1111!:
In 111:1 1 turrulat1on 10110-1 1h: typo: or #:1311311
11
and a1ftbr1a1 gruupo or 1nbjoe1n?! 3) I. 11.90 a 1:90 at 211911».
uh1ah can ho 0514.19 owner only 1» p.111n13 I11h.scv¢ro 1119110
of 1a. hrl1at 11. pwcaqn1 study 11 :1 attnnpt to tnnuur that!
'
'
quaatioun.
.

.

a)

‘

It

ruv1acid our pwvv1éun 11.111. 1: lbw thundhuua 1111
aunt tn 3111.1 1660 9111131: with 1131111 noutal 13119131, n1!uni ndul1a, and 0611111113110 161111, a: 1111 11 in 11:10: auuw
born at annual ah1ldrua. 191111 1114 ptrveaa. and nuhjtatn 1111
"

‘

������9.6
I.

W

“is?

w -4”,

mt Mmhft; m4

tum

Lift ehmaihraght

tpmnh

hand

.
right «near
lath chunku
m

w,

,

axﬁaupunnannlr

m

W or

mm‘uan

ﬁxasamaaﬁhnutu

nynoo

um; obnmrmt hm: right Mk

touch

'touah

'

tough
touch

men

Intt ahaokwlatt hand,

rasht

righﬁ handplath hand
mam wank-law ham

aarrout
mam

"use ohm-might ham

“#1813:thth ma

plum-Mk
-

pmmak’

pupae:
pinyrink

‘

;
.

'

«hank

'Mb
an

1am

m
«mu-

lnft hand

chunk»
iggia choir

vi

1.11 «unwraac' mm

more

was chub-right

1513M chock

m:

10ft §h0¢k~11tt hand

shut

10:! ah‘utu

dxhrnporaonal

«amnion:
yams-vuratian

anyhow.“
.

mutants:
~

aupxmmt
’

.

aim-um

manna
-qnaaannlthnnxl

apnea

“inpriuk

axon apan)

right dhuol+1urt hand
~

right

dhloku

nxtrupuraaunl

oxalannuﬁhnutt

ipano
gagggggx, $hruaugana and ramruplua uhupuusna invariably:
mum. Mama at bum; may run mm mm m
~

.

-

,

m

um:

'adnlta or tn patinntu with gayuhaapnln allardnrn.
Ehiiﬂ roapaasas any. hcan neetainnaliy naan,-haucvnr,
nawuul childrun anal?

mum; anus.

ﬁt; as: a: niglth).

1n

nova various without

at my hm,» (6.1m mun «run»: (10).
was distribution a: the rutpanauu at tbs childron and ﬁend
povuaua urn rulutcdkmmiaiy an inn. In. gamma-it ihixdaan and

tho oldﬂxi adults anew tar-vagina and Icaruylul nonpunuOI.

�‘

W:

mm
in age mix-m
ﬁlo-plat magma“ ham mm

tum”... mama»
m
mam» at m magma

and

m lmt mull m haw
mug-91m and ”mph: 1'0in m1. m~p1m cm W
plus puma Manhunt: 1:: £11111.le with lush.» mam

with

mum «imam, than;

as».

aluminum at tho raw «than!
win;
a:
mug the vulva:
My

mm I:

typo. a:

mum»

um

”amt

nutlo or

mama.
am

am}:

whim“.
show “1'00me and
my b. «manna 41:5:-

W
mam:

Wu mum Imam.

Mama: at mama. to mun: ”3111M
m~m¢ mat in magma Group: a: Sauna
303.11“ m- m Myron!»

am

oiﬁmenm
nor-a1 Mult- (bola 60
yam-n a: m)
30:11 Momma

Am»

Punch” with mad-t3

“an

.

my:

with an organic mum).

four-plus

1-

with

Faunaa with
arm»Mun-name:

-,
.

mm m
1!
10%

W

25%

11"

a

.

33$

25%

0

0

«um
mu:
Maul; an an»

max-1.1

an.

marl:
13.1

'

mane mu
immar

"

70¢

mm

2121.:

1.

22¢

'

as

mvcw
o

mwr
o

(a1 :50 gram» rimlmd)

Wtmy:
In

an:

an“ 1::
-

10‘

m

quantum

15h:

anal» hadn‘t. mt (out mum-l1 try".

intmdmum.
of 30.181"

15.

�11¢

'rn¢a~hund

tutti

anon» and

that

Ghanc 83y.» ¢ﬁa bu

with aux-aunt swap. or unbjubts

corralﬁtod

(mu 1:). mar-sewn“

rauunod Ininly an inn quaahiam at uhnﬁhor zany. was a
typn a: rinyohho ihieh aaourrua-éuly in patinnt. with ncvarn

‘vun

‘

‘

I

diuoat. or thn.brn1u; A11 adult nubgduta-I&amp;th a thwlonplun
or tanrwﬁlns voaponai ham. argnalo hvnzn diuanpu. Such awn
lpaaaoi'nru'nmvur noon in normal aubjﬁotl a: athtontn with
payohaainxa altardbru, av.“ though knit. satay: In: augusianally
than onnuplns «r tuaapxun ruaponn0!.
rntigatt with a¢r¢hrn1 niacin. Innitlnting n {ourwpiuu
than the utvutpuﬁ ﬂfwﬂnit natunaaa ran:
at unntal shamans. ashtrviau than. a: an anoa aorwnlatian
hiﬁno:ﬁ thy try! at ponlttvn tuna-haaa taut uni sho'spvorﬁﬁy
of thy concavial dnftett. Sana pntxcnta with Iivumu unntal
dhtngtﬂ an; hav. «£17 u tronplua vulva”... In &amp;dd1t£an. 10¢
a: pntlnnhs with an emanate aunts: tynﬂramn hat. a nonstivu
_f&amp;oo~hand that. it in thaliﬁda Ihlt tho as. a: I an. to rauv»
plus nandnnlnturu tar Eh. stung. zapztal,nn mnumuuuins angst.
or curabrul dysfunnt;on. Th1! nannnalatuml was usad'huoaulq
or aonslnlduac and Iuﬁh un'inplioitian in not 1ntqn¢nﬁ.
wospcnnc invnrznbiy

bu

thin alacsiriantion af.a paaztivu'fnaamhuhdvtnnt ahaulﬁ
unoful clinioally. In tau§1n§ unurolagisni patignts, can

uxuat typo a: poattzvo tantahﬂnd‘ﬁautVIhuulﬁ ha ruaurdnﬁ.
ruthnr than tho dusignntion ”ﬁn. flaonhnnq G‘st wt: pasittvn'
tn ht! boon Inna until nun. sunk &amp; procoanrt 1111 I!!! 1%
«suit: h¢ Judga uhgthnr/Shn typo or panttivu flatuhnnd cult
xudiontnn dut£n18¢_oumabrnl altouno or whathnr it any b0 u

lanthanum of may

or

«puma. m an at

mm

n

�1‘

12¢

I1III1110II1II I111 IIII IIII 1t III1II II

'

IIIIIII III IIIIIIII
Va: mama II array-II 1;qu
Mina ﬂaw 111mm. III and-'41I1II. 1% II IIIIIIII 1n IltnioIl IIIII1IIIIIE work. for 1%
III IIII III11II 1n IIII1II It III ItrIIII It dIugI In pilv
intlnﬁg III III IIIIIIIII If IIItIItI II I1IIIIIIhIII IIIII~
IIII. In IIII III11II I1IIrII10I 1n IIIIIIILII III II IIII
IIIII I: IIIIrvzac III IIIII1II III.III 1II11IIII I1 III VIII
My or mam» new-m I»: mung IhI pol-1m I: toning.
'

1

.

IA

IIIIIII11III1II If III IIIIIIIII'IIII

1I

IIIIIntId.

III1I1VI'3III-hInd IIII 1a 1IIII1II1 II III in Ih1Ih
IIrIrI
"III-nus «I» III. IIIII and. 2m «:1qu or
with. {III-

IIIII III IIIIIIII. A ﬂﬂéwylul rIIIuhInd IIII IIII1IQI
It III1III1II III: Iith IIIII II1II11. I IIIupiII IIIIIIII
1I IhIaIItII1II4 I: IxI1III10n with IIIIriIk and rubbing Itiaw.
iznli, II II11 II I1Ih.IIIIh IIIII11 A IIrIIupluI_IIIpIIII
V‘aaallﬂtl I: IIILIII1II III d1IpIIIIIIII Itth
ﬁnish) IIhh1ng,
III pmpmqk “mu. A tour-pm «:2me m In III
III.»
IIIII1II1II I: I IhrII~p1II IIIIIIII III 1n IIIlI1II II IIIII
III of III gallbuina :IIIIIIIx I) IIIIIIIIIIIIxIx I) I11IIIIII1I;
II) pIrIIvIrII1II If IIIIIIIII: Q) IIIIIIIIII-It IIIIII IVII
mm In gamut «In min-3911mm I: In: aux-I11." mu...hard

'

pIII Ind rauruplun F‘lpﬁﬂtiliinV§r1ably 1I41IIII d1IIIII Ir_
IhI brIin 1n IIbJIIII III? IhI I3. I: I1! yIIII. III-IIII
III III~p1II IIIIIIIII IIIIr 1n pII1IIII Ilth brIln dLIIIII

Iu§.-m-mo IInitIIIM

pItmu

um:

1?!

I

mI
Immu-

mu mm a:

mmmd‘ «gammy.

adult?!» ‘Ia-I

um:

roux-III

�13*

”I’m: slaw
in mt.

”van“ yum ohms” ‘bat a» mum
um. man 1: ma autumn” Miami: m “writ:
the

m:
to“ Wand»
autumn“

of thin

that

and

of mm

mm

uni t1»

tarp".

an»

1.

Italy at isthmus clinically

Match

or

with. rut-had

unnatural“: in

magma-u work

��I

3"?

’

ﬂu-h'S-S.%F#M

___________Z;#__~__'——_

��15 November 50

Dear Dr. Bender,

of
outline
the studies in which

Following is an
I an participating under your supervision:
a. Being prepared for presentation:

i.

Patterns in perception in simultaneous tests of

the face and the hand
2. The Face-Hand test in the Organic Eental Syndrome
3. Patterns in perception in simultaneous tests of
parts of the body other than the face and the
hand

4. Caee report- Ethel Beckhorn
Nos. 1-4 with‘Dr. Green.
5. Dyecheirie (with Dr. Shapiro)

i"

i‘b.

Under study:

1. 08? changes following arteriography
2. Gomplicatione of arteriography; evaluation of
the indications for the use of arteriogreﬁhy
and the diagnostic value of the technic
//
Both of these studies with Dr. Stein.
c. Proposed for study under grant by Rational Foundation
&gt;

~

for Infantile Paralysis:

',//

n,

,

1. Relation of sdaptation time, D. S. S. and threshold
stimuli in hemiplegia
2. Patterns and factors in the responses of children
to D.S.S.; comparison with patients with organic
mental changes
5. Gen extinction and displacement be observed in
normal subjects using threshold etimnli ?

��S.R. 5004-590M-701102(50)
.

Q.CITY OF
114

NEW YORK—DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALS
....................................................................................HOSPITAL

CaseNo..._....__.._____

PROGRESS RECORD
Name...”......................................................................................

Admitted........................................................................ 19 ..........

Ward .......................

Observations and Opinions of Visitings, Consultants and House Staﬁ.
A Final Discharge Note Must Be Entered on This Sheet.
Sign and Date Every Entry.

.1

e

.

@an

A

‘
I

PM

‘

-

"Wx.

Ei‘f~

“.

is

_

\

[and

V5“;-

R‘-

j

"”

r

4

iLIJJzJOU» SMCJE
,

A

'

""19“...“
'&gt;.

-

Binding

for

Blank

Leave

_____________________———_———————-———————————— Continue

Notes on Other Side

�....................................... Division

-_
___.____________.____.______.~________.
Name__________._____.____—____________ Admitted_____.______19___ Ward__.______

HISTORY
Case No...........-.--..._..........

�Prev

/‘

M.
‘

.‘2.

ﬁr M/-

&gt;

mmf‘ég:

WW
“W
$79“me
w /W Cm
_

"

'2)

05/- m

[4

W.“
4.xMWaﬂ-

Y.‘ET&gt;:0&lt;I!WI.’:.6-m¢

3.

‘

,

m

“V

x-‘6

'

/MM
7

5% Wxép

(a;

£44, ﬂZZp/raa

‘

'

414w"

'

*W
V

»

dpg, fast/aw.
.

."

~

,

‘

‘

”

WW

w
44},

W

ﬂm J‘

'

%¢

./

Wugﬁéﬂy‘é {It/*4:

‘7'

'

£4cﬂ/r/oﬂ

/

‘

(a)

c“: M 447‘

014M;

.—

.

W
M¢W7
(a)

ﬂﬂ

‘

lg‘ :11

I

"

'I

Cc)

.A

”..th M
71

M

06‘,”

f

dams.

M
@5447

{a}

)Lgpi

'

‘

CW

“(:1

‘

.

I! 927'.

/

2/41/57

I
I

.-

.

'

�‘-

‘

[ﬁt/F:

/'
.

bgg“

Cﬂ/

ﬂab;

(A)
(C2,

(d)

‘

#9“

‘LLa/
‘

(t/
(6)

—

—

.gaw

7-

~

.

w,

-.

V

,

‘

2

MU .77

.\

.m-

..

N dﬂ.

.

.

2—-»2

mg,

n.»

w'mwﬁuﬁwwmva»'l-.~'N|—*»r'l~"
~

W

WWW

-

.2

“nt‘mmr”

-r---.—"'::.w¢
~

v

.

r

~»

-

A).

.'

I

'

'
-

7W Mug/4; may
MA MA C” MAM.)

‘

g"

23—

‘

,

KMW?’"W

2

,

”vi—7L Maw ‘é‘ﬂ‘””€p’l‘:&amp;7)

Ja 'MLLW‘S—é
'

f

».

«my...

WWW
F3
(’5ch
Marni

WM

$9.44

vyww-W.

K

'

’

_'
,

“we?“

�\
(511;.

,

n

vmmmwmamwmn

,..n,,_1.H
wwmm»

Jag.
Eat]!!!

w
.

ﬂirt;

_
,

��-\\W§

/
r
m
rmk
?
f l“
g. ER

@JQ

04..

\W
U

k).

.

r

,ﬁ,

,

hut/1x!” fM*€?‘/\

@4414)

E.

W Mu'~/./

m.

WW;

I

u...

2’

4;

.

5/

‘

Ij’./‘_
.

(701

mm Zig‘

M7

Wha//,£4Cﬂ~/

I”

.

WQVMU‘7/

”QM/“Mud
"

4/357

5W)

.

4 “

,«('¢
-

�'moc;
Wow/W
Wamgwowg
”I
q

(9'!me

g

(growl

‘W
EM

..

3x07: K7
/I

/

Wz/
~1ﬂ-C/

.

_

.

.

£424
£42

.‘7—‘/

.1”

41’ ’74?
V
'

I

'

-

MMWQ

M(M)/Zm

i

M
NK‘Z

me/W

5'

Wbﬁ-gc %

'4’

[ﬁnd/ff

IV

,7/C/Wﬂ7 MKLKKWWL)

Wot/Logbook,

‘

,t,

611%11f3/144». ”fa/two! 4/1“
7- (WW) AL 14mg Ego; Kilo/offéﬁ:
354‘: J)»; 4995]
27134 2 WWW/4i lnﬁ
w.

M

Karo-4L

_

‘4

...mo

�.i

M’m
a???
MM
Mpg mdM

gm»

9'

%%-Q
zf/Zex/L

"0

§.
‘
7.

'C'meioo
0
-

,'.
:_
‘
,

V

I‘

f
2

w"ww-wrr‘rvmrg'm'rﬂ’wm

.‘

‘

va

~—

4”“)

A.“

I

—W"%*“W,

.M'MJ’

%{d’ #Cnﬁwwﬁu
'&gt;

--

iT

do

n-

u

,7

��'

a: @729;
:x/Ma.
0W
Aw, I M» WWW; cm,
”MM” zz Aggy”: —G/2/m a.

V'aéém

,

�Reprinted from

TRANSACTIONS
OF THE

AMERICAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

SEVENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING, JUNE 13-15, 1949

OBSERVATIONS ON THE EXTINCTION
PHENOMENON IN HEMIPLEGIA
MORRIS B. BENDER
MORTIMER F. SHAPIRO
AND

A. W. SCHAPPELL
NEW YORK

Routine sensory examinations are usually carried out with the method
of single stimulation. This method appears to be adequate, but it does not
always disclose existing defects in sensibility. For example, in a patient with
a right cerebral lesion the left side of the body may be sentient to a single
stimulus. However, the sensation evoked at this very point may no longer
be apparent as soon as another stimulation is made elsewhere, such as on
the opposite side of the body. The same change in sensation may be elicited
with the method of double simultaneous stimulation. This disappearance or
extinction of a sensation is not always complete. At times the patient reports a dulling or obscuration rather than extinction. Extinction and obscuration have been found in tests of all types of sensation. They may be
observed in patients with lesions implicating the sensory pathways of the
brain or spinal cord.
The object of this study was to determine: (a) the method which is
most successful in eliciting the phenomenon of extinction, (b) the pattern
in which extinction manifests itself on the paretic side in cases of cerebral
hemiplegia and (C) the frequency with which extinction of cutaneous pin
prick sensation occurs in patients with hemiplegia.
Fifty patients with hemiplegia were selected at random from the medical
and psychiatric wards of Bellevue Hospital. Patients with aphasia or psychosis were included in the series only when their responses in sensory tests
were consistent in one respect or another. In this study the cutaneous sensory
status of patients with hemiplegia were first estimated by the customary
method of single stimulation with the prick of a pin. The patient was asked
to report whether he felt a sharp or dull sensation. Various regions of the
body were thus tested and compared for degree of sensibility. The same
patient was then examined with the method of double simultaneous stimulation.
Three variations of the method were employed: (A) simultaneous stimulation of points in homologous regions on the two sides of the body, such
as the right and left hand, the right and left side of face, etc.; (B) simultaneous stimulation of points in non-homologous regions on the two sides
160

�Bender, et al.—Extinction Phenomenon in Hennplegia

161

of the body, such as the right face and left hand, the right shoulder and left
face, etc.; (C) simultaneous stimulation of points in two different regions
on the ipsilateral side of the body, such as the right face and right hand, the

right hand and right foot. On each test the patient was asked to report the
location and quality of sensations. When the patient reported only one
sensation, he was asked if he felt another in any other region .of the body.
If he felt two sensations evoked by the simultaneous method, he was asked
to compare them.
RESULTS

The most effective technique for eliciting the phenomenon of extinction
was found to be Method B, or the simultaneous stimulation of non-homologous regions on the two sides of the body, such as the face on the healthy
side and the hand on the hemiplegic side. The next most effective was
Method C, or the simultaneous stimulation of two regions on the hemiplegic side, as for example, the face and hand on the affected side. Method A,
or the simultaneous stimulation of homologous areas on the two sides of
the body, did not reveal sensory defects as frequently as did Methods B
or C.
Although we have been stressing the phenomenon of extinction or the
disappearance or decrease of a sensation, we have not overlooked the other
aspect of the situation obtained on double simultaneous stimulation, namely,
the retention of a sensation. We shall refer to the sensation which is retained as “dominant” and the one which disappears as “extinct”. Examina—
tions with the various methods of double simultaneous stimulation showed
existence of gradients of sensibility throughout the body. One sensory region
was dominant to another. Further studies showed that these gradients were
patterned. The pattern on the hemiplegic side revealed sensory dominance
greatest in the face and less in descending order in the following regions—
face, thigh, shoulder, foot and hand. In other words, when the face and any
other part of the body on the hemiplegic side were simultaneously tested, as
a rule the sensation in the face was perceived while sensation in any other
one part was reported as diminished or absent (extinct).
A phenomenon which appeared directly related to sensory dominance
was that of “displacement”. In some instances when non—homologous regions on both sides of the body were tested simultaneously, the patient reported he felt two sensations of equal intensity, there being no extinction.
The sensation was localized correctly on the normal side. However, the
sensation evoked by the stimulus applied to the affected side was incorrectly
localized. There was an ipsilateral displacement of the sensation toward a
region homologous to the point of stimulation on the normal side. The displacement was usually toward dominant sensory regions. Thus when the
patient was pricked simultaneously on the face on the normal side and the
hand on the hemiplegic side, he reported that both sides of the face had

�162

Bender, et (LL—Extinction Phenomenon in H emiplegia

been stimulated; or if the hand on the normal side and the face on the
paretic side were simultaneously tested, he claimed that both hands had
been pricked. In some cases of disease of the brain the displacement phe—
nomenon was the earliest indication of sensory impairment. As the disease
progressed, displacement was replaced by obscuration and eventually by
extinction.
One of the signiﬁcant ﬁndings of this study was the demonstration of
sensory deﬁcits in patients with a severe psychosis or aphasia. Usually such
patients are considered incapable of giving coherent or consistent answers
in routine sensory examinations. The psychotic or aphasic individual has
trouble in expressing comparisons between two successively induced sensa—
tions. He has less trouble when the stimuli are applied simultaneously. With
this technique the psychotic or aphasic patient usually responds by pointing
to the sentient or “dominant” region and he repeatedly ignores the region
which is apparently “extinct”.
In summary, it was found that a sensation in one region of the body is
readily inﬂuenced by a sensation evoked in another area. This inﬂuence is
most apparent with the methods of double simultaneous stimulation. Using
these methods in patients with hemiplegia it was found that extinction occurred in 44 of the 50 patients, whereas routine single stimulus examination
’disclosed defective sensation in only 29 cases. Furthermore in 28 of the
latter 29 cases the sensory defects became more conspicuous with these
techniques.

����.ﬂmwéﬂ

nMMﬂL—{A‘ay /m4_g.

fa/A/uc/WIZMM

g/éé,‘M/£¢M

�����,

.p~..,

��'

‘D’Mwnrw

hvﬂﬂ

:-

f/‘f/f’l

a,

am» ,

.

MW Wm

V“

‘

“Mm

,¢__,-m..‘

w

ngvm’regﬁww .5

w
(V)

(:3)

gﬂ/hﬂﬂﬂh

"

M 7% rﬁi.

ﬂé’i

ﬂmw

’2

mm
//M
I.“

_

‘
‘

‘
.

;
.

\n

��wifﬁmﬁ’ﬁ;

’

����������51$“ “&lt;4

3

“it
wﬁéu'wéi 3‘” van

���.

hi

illanh.

‘

,

‘

.A

$1.1Hnawwlllflsfalz

”436,...

13.36

Tamrgwuau

.-1...i1w.uiu.«ni.1&gt;

53.53.»,

.

�7,)

3“,

Wu
3.

'

*

-

“aim/ad.

4.54.wa

975‘;

‘au

)

«,2;

MMM) LC“
962.7

‘@

dﬂaﬁcﬁ

.

*3
SI

�����5.9.50
Sensory Studies

In a discussion with Dr Bender today he made the following

suggestions:

1. That studies of the face— hand, face - penis
as carried out in the normal could be extended in the pattern
of shoulder - foot, hand - thigh etc. This will give an outline
of a homonculus of sensory dominance in the normal-2. The studies of the reaction in the normal on
the abnormal in the penis and breast tests
two directions: the influence of amytal
might
on the normal response and the responses to the test in severe

the

test and
initial
be extended in

anxiety states (hysterias

.

.

.).

3. It would be an error at the present time to
describe the testing as a definite aid in the diagnosis of the
organic mental syndrome. With such a figure, the physiological
implications of the testing would be pushed to the background.
But that if the studies can be verified as valid in OMS, then
it might later be described in that condition as another test

like orientation,

patterns

be

4.

A

memory,

etc.

special study in normal children of these

undertaken.

5. The problem of Beckhorn be presented as an
example of a hemisensory syndrome that appears to D83 and SS
upon proper stimulation; and the effect of intersensory testing.
6. In the writing of the definitive paper on the
face - hand test, the following subjects must be covered:
a discussion of the various theories behind dominance as the
rostral idea, medial over lateral structures (concentric),
importance of sexual symbols, skin sensitivity, etc.;
the possibility that the disturbance is related to the state
of consciousness and not the state of the reverbalization
processes (aphasia, apraxia, etc.); order of dominance;
7.

ﬂ“:
4

6)

m—NMWYWKwh./Lu&amp;m"
“mu—~15 4/444./GLL; »

(aﬂdiiaruiuiii7é«vl» «Ajfaa

��w'

-——--

-—-\P,K..

-7.

”w“

,

-..~

»

‘

.

w...

«kw,

-

,

2"” “av

7“,:'71,~',Izﬁivm"’"&gt;:_’r

W."'etrwwgu—cvrw"'_nWWW'-W‘4~‘Xmu_t7$m,va'ﬁ«mv-JzT’n-VH—W-jw

���:5,“
.p

�n.

amm.m,mumaamfummmmm

WWIIWWthﬂph
man. «mmmmmmmmmmw
sun-1m.

mmﬂumuhmmmamtmmmw}
“mummummummmmum. In
”n.1tmtmmtﬂ9dmmtnmuﬂlmmm
mun“
«nu‘mum. mwmwwmwu

mummu$mmmmmmmmm
um. umzmwmwm'mmamu
Manama-Mun

m. memumw,
AtMMmzmmm,mmum-.

m.

‘mmmumasnmammtmuw. m4
ummm‘mmm'mmnpmmwmt
«Mm. In mmatmwmt‘mm
tan-amormmumumuummmu
mMmmmummumma-uum
W.uuamoauucmummnv. MM
mama-mmwpumwmm Mum-.m.

numuummmmmwmtm
ammcmm.
msmmmmuucm
mmummommmmmnm
m
W 3mm “mum. my.
-

‘

cw:
‘Wummmmommwwmmncum
Lu

as

hmmwmmummmum
mWMﬂdeaW. amateud'n’

mm.

mumw-muwmmmmnuxy. mam

pmmmamm.mmcmmm.

'

In

�A.

m-

«mu

about

omru
both

only

out

“Mutt

“man.

“that m mmim many.

agun app“! than much

an am:

as

my

“than“ and not a: 41min”

occur only with much

an. t.

thin

1::

um:
Am

11%

than magnate

min
u an“.
»

arm. will

Although

"111W.

«m: um mm». m m..a; yur on
par mu”;- o; «tawny Au mung. to: as”
A

a

law m um pursue! of am In m. m “mu“. :1.»
m u. may. and in mount. m «:11 mun-oust“: man;

In I not, mutant.

mt. mum am no avid-m
m mm: npydmd dept-nu“.

shufﬂing

‘

at ”upland. "imam dunno.

‘

'

mm ”mm gunman.

A

and «rind

"am.

mo

na-

tartan an intact. him). mad, thotvmmmlom ma
xnms at that ‘91:» mm,~pm31. m umu- in imam-v
uma panama... damned typo. in» we annulus... an
“to tho «ya-alum
69 In
this 9131.!“ that«I I out-91m mum» on the {WW
Ian." A awn»a! nu 'WOPW“ Yemen:
a:
,

W

‘Wt
I

'

“wt

touch

an

'

touch
tumult

tench

Chow-loft hm

right than!

loft ma~n§z was
ﬁght
hm

tough
touch
tough.

;

.

may“
Alma-10“.

rum

13.31:!

i

maintain-ﬂ cum:

right hum-Mu

an Mi:

mam:

ma

«Musician

,.

unnatﬁn
utimtion

mot

it“ in.“

00m."

animation
'

com“

dwt Bulk-tilt; land ”at;
.

chm-k

-

«tintim

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2274">
                <text>The face-hand test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome. Neurology. 1952 Jan-Feb; 2(1): 46-58. And, Observations on the Extinction Phenomenon in Hemiplegia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2275">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2276">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-3-005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2277">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2278">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Green, Martin; Bender, Morris B.; Schappell, A. W.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2279">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2280">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2281">
                <text>15 items, each with various amounts of pages. 1: Read at the second biennial meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Virginia Beach, Virginia, April 11, 1951. 2: Reprinted from January—February 1952 (Vol. 2, N0. 1) Issue of NEUROLOGY. 3: New York Society for Clinical Psychiatry: The 116th Regular Meeting of the Society. 4: [Preprint]. 5: list of publications by Fink. 6 and 7: Drafts. 8: handwritten notes. 9: Letter to Dr. Bender from Fink. 10: handwritten note. 11: City of New York - Department of Hospitals/ Progress Record. 12: Handwritten notes. 13: Reprint from Transactions of the American Neurological Association 74th Annual Meeting, June 13-15, 1949; Observations on the Extinction Phenomenon in Hemiplegia (not written by Fink). 14: Handwritten notes. 15: typed pages.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2282">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2283">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74430">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80991">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87552">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94113">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="272" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="63">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0a74924969c48b97fad064f4d827441c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e33e0604bf1a53d201e8e551507b5084</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100689">
                    <text>Founded in 1887 by G. STANuIY HALL

OFFPRINTED FROM

THE AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
EDITED BY

KARL M. DALLENBACH
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
AND

M. E. BITTERMAN

BRYN MAWR COLLEGE

E. B. NEWMAN

HARVARD UNIVERSITY

WITH THE COOPERATION OF
E. G. BORING, Harvard University; W. K. ESTES, Indiana University; J. P.
GUILFORD, University of Southern California; HARRY HBLSON, University of
Texas; E. R. HILGARD, Stanford University; FRANCIS W. IRWIN, University
of Pennsylvania; G. L. KREEZER, Washington University; D. G. MARQUIS,
Social Science Research Council; GEORGE A. MILLER, Harvard University;
W. B. PILLSBURY, University of Michigan; LEO PosTMAN, University of
California; W. C. H. PRENTICE, Swarthmore College; T. A. RYAN, Cornell
University.

THE ROLE OF SET IN THE PERCEPTION OF
‘SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

By HYMAN KORIN and MAX FINK, Glenn Oaks, Long Island

September, 1959, Vol. LXXII
pp. 384—392

Published b The American Journal of Psychology. Department of
sychology, University of Texas, Austin. Tex.

�Founded in 1887 by G. STANLEY HALL

OFFPRINTED FROM

THE AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
EDITED BY

KARL M. DALLENBACH
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
AND

M. E. BITTERMAN

BRYN MAWR COLLEGE

E. B.

NEWMAN

HARVARD UNIVERSITY

WITH THE COOPERATION OF
E. G. BORING, Harvard University; W. K. ESTES, Indiana
University;

j.

P.

University of Southern California; HARRY HELSON, University of
Texas; E. R. HILGARD, Stanford University; FRANCIS W. IRWIN, University
of Pennsylvania; G. L. KREEZER, Washington University; D. G. MARQUIS,
Social Science Research Council; GEORGE A. MILLER, Harvard
University;
W. B. PILLSBURY, University of Michigan; LEO POSTMAN, University of
California; W. C. H. PRENTICE, Swarthmore College; T. A. RYAN, Cornell
University.
GUILFORD,

THE ROLE OF SET IN THE PERCEPTION OF
SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

By HYMAN KORIN and MAX FINK, Glenn Oaks, Long Island

September, 1959, Vol. LXXII
pp. 384-392

Published by The American Journal of Psychology, Department of
Psychology. University of Texas, Austin, Tex.

�THE ROLE OF SET IN THE PERCEPTION OF
SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI
By HYMAN KORIN and MAX FINK,

Glenn Oaks, Long Island

The inﬂuential role of ‘mental set’ in determining a subject’s response
to a perceptual task has been well documented.] In studies of the perception of simultaneous, tactile stimuli, various patterns of response have
been observed which seemed to be the result of a set induced by suggestion. This investigation was undertaken to determine the relation between
different conditions of ‘set’ and the frequency and type of perceptual error
elicited in tests with simultaneous, tactile stimuli.
Recently the advantages of the simultaneous stimulation of different
body-parts in tests of tactile perception have been stressed.2 Simultaneous
stimulation may elicit perceptual errors under conditions in which successive single stimulations are correctly perceived. When two stimuli are
applied to body-parts at the same time, only one stimulus may be reported
—an error referred to as 'extinction’; or one stimulus may be perceived
correctly and the other mislocalized—an error called 'displacement.’
Occasionally, if a single stimulus is interspersed in the testing-sequence,
it may be reported correctly, but an additional, extraneous stimulus may
also be reported—an error of ‘confabulation.’ Such errors of extinction,
displacement, and confabulation are signiﬁcantly increased in patients with
brain dysfunction.
When errors of extinction and displacement occur, they are elicited in
a consistent pattern. Thus, on stimulation of the hand and face, the
stimulus to the face is usually reported correctly, while that to the hand
is mislocalized or not reported. By testing various combinations of bodyparts, an ‘order of dominance’ may be determined in which stimuli to the
face and genital areas are most often perceived and those to the hand are
for publication September 23, 1958. From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glenn Oaks, Long Island, New York and aided
in part by Grant M-927, National Institute of Health, US. Public Health Service.
1]. J. Gibson, A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology, Pryc/aol. 32111., 38, 1941, 781—817; Robert Leeper, Cognitive processes, in S. S. Stevens (ed), Handbook of Evperimeoto] Psychology, 1951, 730-757.
2M. B. Bender, Disorder: in Perception, 1952; M. B. Bender, M. A. Green, and
Max Fink, Patterns of perceptual organization with simultaneous stimuli, A.M.A.
Arc/a. Neural. é Put/riot, 72, 1954, 233-255; Fink, Green and Bender, The facehand test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome, Neurol., 2, 1952, 46-58.
* Received

384

�SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

385

least often perceived. Between these extremes, stimuli to the shoulder, foot,
buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen are perceived in a gradient.3
Theories involving factors of rostral dominance,‘ maturation,“ inattention,6 and
inherent body-image,7 have been advanced to explain the organization of these
perceptual patterns, but no one theory has adequately explained all the facts. We
have ascribed signiﬁcance to the relative intensity of the stimuli and the thresholdvalue in the frequency and the pattern of the 'extinction’ error, when electrical
stimuli are applied at threshold and suprathreshold intensities.8

The present study was undertaken to assess the relation between ‘set’
induced by suggestion and errors of 'confabulation’ and 'displacement.’
The speciﬁc problem studied is whether an 'inquiry’ into the testing pro—
cedure is signiﬁcantly related to the frequency and type of these errors.
Since these errors are most prominent in $5 with cerebral dysfunction,
patients undergoing convulsive and subconvulsive therapies were studied.
Subjects. The 55 were 61 consecutive psychotic patients referred for electroconvulsive therapy. Their ages ranged between 21—67 yr., mean age being 46 yr. Thirtyseven of them received convulsive therapy; 14 ﬁrst received subconvulsive therapy
and then convulsive therapy; and 10 received subconvulsive therapy alone. The 55
were selected for convulsive or subconvulsive treatment on a random basis by the
supervising psychiatrist.

Procedure. Two model S-4B Grass square-wave stimulators were synchronized to
deliver either single or simultaneous electrical stimuli. An isolation unit was connected with each stimulator to eliminate artifacts and the Output was visually monitored by an oscilloscope. A switch-box was inserted in the circuit to permit independent selection of the various parts of the body. The active and indifferent electrodes for each part were small 3ﬁg-in. steel disks, placed l-in. apart and secured
with tape. Bentonite electrode paste was rubbed into the skin of each area before
the electrodes were applied.
The patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine position. To alleviate
undue anxiety, the nature of the testing was described. It was emphasized that a
slight tap-like sensation would be felt. The electrodes were then placed on (a) the
dorsum of the hands, (b) the mandibular area of both cheeks, and (c) the medial
aspect of the calves of the legs.

aBender, Green, and Fink, op. .cit., 253-255.
4R. Cohn, On certain aspects of the sensory organization of the human brain: I.
A study in rostral dominance as determined by ipsilateral simultaneous stimulation,
]. new. mem‘. Dis., 113, 1951, 471-484; II. A study in rostral dominance in chil1, 1951, 110-122.
Neurol.,
dren,
5
Louis Linn, Some developmental aspects of the body image, Int. ]. Pryc/ooanol.,
36, 1955, 1-7.

6Macdonald Critchley, The phenomenon of tactile inattention with speciﬁc references to pariental lesions, Brain, 72, 1949, 538-561.
7Bender, op. cit., 77-88.
8
Hyman Korin and Max Fink, Role of stimulus intensity in perception of simultaneous electrical cutaneous stimuli, I. Hillside H0511, 6, 1957, 241-250

�386

KORIN AND FINK

Thresholds for the various body-parts were ﬁrst determined. At a frequency of
0.3 cycles per sec. and a pulse-duration of 50 m.sec., the voltage was increased in
uniform increments of 5 v. to the hands and 1 v. to the cheeks every 6.7 sec. (2
pulses) until 5 perceived 100% of the stimulations. After a 10-sec. interval, voltages were decreased until the sensation was no longer reported. After another 10sec. interval, voltages were increased by 1 v. every 6 sec. until the patient again
reported 100% of the stimulations. This reading was considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold-sensation.
After thresholds were determined, testing with a random series of 4 single and
6 double simultaneous stimulations followed. The body parts tested were the right
hand and left cheek (heterologous stimulation) and the right cheek and the left
cheek (homologous stimulation). Stimuli were applied either simultaneously or to
one part singly, in a mixed order, for 10 trials. The order of presentation of the
heterologous and homologous stimulation was alternated.
Failure to report the interspersed single stimuli served as an index that the perceptual threshold had changed. At such times the threshold was again determined,
and the 10 test-trials were repeated. Threshold changes, however, occurred infrequently during testing.
The patients were tested in two groups: an ‘inquiry' group and a 'no-inqury’
group. The ‘inquiry’ group, consisting of 24 convulsive and 9 subconvulsive 55,
was asked the question ”anywhere else?" after each response to a stimulation. No
question was asked of the 'no-inquiry’ group, which consisted of 27 convulsive and
15 subconvulsive $5. (The total number of Ss exceeds 61, since 1 S in the 'inquiry’
group and 13 Ss in the ‘no-inquiry’ group were included both in the convulsive and
the subconvulsive series.)
Electroencephalograms were obtained weekly, on a day following a treatment.
These records were quantitatively measured for the degree of induced slow-wave
(delta) activity.9 Both the convulsive and the subconvulsive treatments were administered three times weekly on alternative days.

Remltr: (1) Errors of confabulation. A response was scored as a confabulation if two stimuli were reported when only a single stimulus was
applied. The observations are noted in Table I.
In the 'inquiry’ group, confabulatory errors were elicted before treatment from both types of Ss—convulsive and subconvulsive. During treatment, the mean error increased from 0.08 to 0.72 among the ‘convulsive’
Ss and from 0.22 to 0.70 among the ‘subconvulsive’ ones. After treatment, the mean number of confabulations persisted in the ‘subconvulsive’
55 (1.00) but declined in the ‘convulsive’ ones (0.10); the difference
0.90 being signiﬁcant at better than the 5% level.10 In the 'no-inquiry’
9Max Fink and R. L. Kahn, Relation of EEG delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock: Quantitative serial studies, A.M.A. Arc/9. Neural. &lt;5 Psytbidt., 78, 1957, 516-525.
1”
The Mann-Whitney ‘U'-test was used to test the signiﬁcance of these data and
those that follow as the scores were not drawn from a normally distributed population.
Since the 'U'-test is based on rank-order of the scores, the differences between
means are only grossly related to level of signiﬁcance.

�387

SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

group, few confabulations occurred at any interval of testing for either
the convulsive or the subconvulsive 55.
Before treatment, the subconvulsive, ‘inquiry’ 55 made signiﬁcantly more
confabulatory errors than the subconvulsive, ‘no-inquiry’ 55. In a comparison of the ‘inquiry and ‘no-inquiry’ procedures during treatment, the
differences were signiﬁcant both in the convulsive and subconvulsive
groups of $5. The differences during treatment are based on the substantial
increase in the number of confabulations of the ‘inquiry’ group. After
treatment, the confabulations of the convulsive, ‘inquiry’ group decreased
to the pretreatment level, and the differences between the convulsive,
'inquiry’ and ‘no-inquiry’ groups were not signiﬁcant. Though the mean
TABLE I
MEAN NUMBER ERRORS 0P CONFABULATION

No inquiry

Inquiry
Period

convul’ subr
convul.
sive

(N: 24)
Pretreatment
Treatment
Post’treatment
*

p&lt;o.os;

.08
.72
.

10

(N= 9)
.

22

.70
I .oo

Tp&lt;o.o3;

———————
convul’ subr
convul.
sive

(N: 27) (N: 15)
o
.11
. 06

o

.05
—-—

Diff. between
inquiry and no!

——
inquiry

convul’ subr
sive convul.
.08
.22:
.61]L

. o4

.65T
—

Diff. between

convulsive and
subconvulsive

——
inquiry
n0r

inquiry

.

14

.02
.

90*

0

.06
—

Ip&lt;o.01.

number of errors of the subconvulsive, 'inquiry’ 55 increased after treatment, a comparison between the ‘inquiry’ and 'no-inquiry’ subconvulsive
55 could not be made. Data were not obtained after treatment from the
subconvulsive ‘no-inquiry’ 55 because they were transferred to convulsive
treatment and were not available for testing.
(2) Error; of dirplacement. A response was scored as a displacement if the
locus of one of two stimuli was reported correctly and the other incorrectly.
Displacements were rarely elicited from the Ss in any of the groups (Table
II). The mean number of displacements tended to increase during treatment for the convulsive 55, but the differences from the pretreatment
period lack signiﬁcance.
( 3 ) Error: of extinction. An error was scored as an extinction if only one
of two simultaneously applied stimuli was reported. The difference in the
number of errors of extinction between the ‘inquiry’ and ‘no-inquiry’
groups was not signiﬁcant at any period during the course of therapy both
for the convulsive and subconvulsive 55 (Table III). During treatment,
the mean number of extinctions decreased in all groups. At this period,

�388

KORIN AND FINK

the difference between the convulsive and subconvulsive, 'inquiry’ 55 was
signiﬁcant. After treatment the errors of all the groups decreased further.
(-4) Errors of confaémlatz'on and change: in EEG. An analysis was made
of the number of confabulatory errors elicited in convulsive Ss in relation
to the degree of electroencephalographic change. ‘Inquiry’ $3 with high
degrees of delta activity made significantly more confabulatory errors than
inquiry patients with moderate and low degrees of delta activity (Table
IV), while few errors were reported by the ‘no-inquiry’ Ss regardless of
the change in the EEG. The mean scores of the moderate and low EEG
among the ‘inquiry’ 55 was similar to the mean scores of the ‘no-inquiry'
ones.

N0 EEG slow-wave activity or low degrees of such activity occurred in
TABLE II
MEAN NUMBER ERRORS

Post—treatment

*

DISPLACEMENT

Convulsive

Period*

Pretreatment
Treatment

or

inquiry
. o6
. 09
. 08

Subconvulsive

no’inquiry
-

.

07

.

IO

.

02

inquiry
o

.02
. 06

nOrinquiry
0
.01
o

Inter! and intrargroup differences are not signiﬁcant at any period.

the subconvulsive 55. As had been indicated, however, the number of
confabulatory errors of the subconvulsive group increased signiﬁcantly during and after treatment. This increase resulted from increasing confabulatory errors in four of the nine patients.
Dircmrz'on. Errors of displacement, confabulation, and extinction are
elicited when sequences of multiple and single tactile stimuli are applied
to various parts of the body. In clinical tests with touch stimulation, these
errors are most prominent in patients with cerebral disease.11 Theories
which have been advanced to account for the occurrence of such errors
have therefore emphasized endogenous factors involving the central nervous system. Numerous studies of the role of set in perception indicate,
nevertheless, that the frequency and type of response to a perceptual task
may be markedly altered by the immediate aspects of a situation.12 In this
study the stimulus-situation has been varied to bring about differing conditions of mental set. The endogenous factors have not, however, been
11Pink, Green, and Bender, op. cit., 46-58.
12Leeper, op. cit, 752-757; Max Pollack, W. S. Battersby, and M. B. Bender,
Tachistoscopic identiﬁcation of contours in patients with brain damage, I. romp.
playriol. Pry/301., 50, 1957, 220-227.

�389

SIMULTANEO US TACTILE STIMULI

neglected and the relation between the effects of diﬂerent degrees of brain
dysfunction has also been determined.
In the course of convulsive therapy a marked increase in the number
of confabulatory errors is brought about by the ES query: “anywhere
else?” which followed every stimulation. Of the convulsive 55 who were
asked this question, confabulations were elicited primarily in the group
with high degrees of EEG slow-wave activity (marked cerebral dysfuncTABLE III
MEAN NUMBER ERRORS 0F EXTINCTION

Period

Inquiry
———————-———

convul—

sive

Pretreatment
Treatment
Postvtreatment
*

subr
convul.

(N: 24) (N: 9)
I6
2.03
1.37

I . 67
1.14

2.

.89

Diff. between

No inquiry

—————
convulv
sive

(N= 27)
2. 76
1.71
1.44

sub
convul.

(N: 15')

inquiry and
n0vinquiry

-——-—~—convulr subv
vulsive convul.

2. 37
1.27
——

.60
.32
.07

.70

\

.13
—

Diff. between

convulsive and
subconvulsive

N0
inquiry
.49
.39
.89*
.44
—
.48

inquiry

p&lt;o.os.
TABLE IV
RELATION BETWEEN

EEG DELTA ACTIVITY

AND MEAN NUMBER OF CONFABULATORY
ERRORS

Degree of Delta activity

Group
inquiry
no inquiry

.81
.10

high

moderatealow

Diff.

Signif.

(N= 9)
(N=2I)

.19 (N= 10)
.07 (N: 6)

.62
.03

p&lt;0.05
N.S.

tion) and not in the group with low and moderate degrees (minimal
cerebral dysfunction). The importance of the inquiry is emphasized by the
consideration that, regardless of changes in the EEG, there was little
tendency for confabulatory errors to occur among the convulsive 55 when
no inquiry was made. Thus both inquiry and high degrees of EEG delta
activity provided the milieu favorable to evoking confabulatory errors in
the c0nvulsive therapy 55.
Subconvulsive 35 present a different picture. Although virtually no delta
activity is induced by subconvulsive therapy, the number of confabulatory
errors of four of the nine subconvulsive Ss queried increased substantially
during the treatment. Furthermore, while the confabulatory errors of
these four subconvulsive Ss persisted and even increased following the
course of therapy, the errors of the convulsive Ss queried, in contrast, decreased to the pretreatment level. Patterns of reversible error manifested

�390

KORIN AND FINK

by convulsive 55 have been reported in the various studies of the effects

of electroshock on different types of mental functioning.13 It was expected,
however, that confabulations would not be elicited in subconvulsive $5 at
is
cerebral
that
earlier
observations
of
view
dysfunction
in
period,
any
not induced in these patients.14
An explanation for the differences between the ‘convulsive’ and subc0nvulsive ‘inquiry’ 55 is that their therapies had differing effects on the
factor of practice. In 'convulsive’ 55, treatment diminished the practiceeffect, including those both with low and high degrees of slow-wave EEG
activity. For each test-interval, it was as if the ‘convulsive’ 55 were starting
anew. Under these conditions, only $5 with high EEG delta activity manifested a confabulatory set within a single test-period. After the course of
therapy, with the disappearance of the delta activity, convulsive 35 were
performing at the pretreatment-level. In the ‘subconvulsive’ $5, the set established in the pretreatment-interval was reinforced during each test-period
during treatment. Thus the subconvulsive S 5 made even more confabulatory
errors after treatment.
The results for the subconvulsive group of 55 indicate that certain of them
Such
brain-function.
of
alteration
without
make
an
errors
confabulatory
may
53 are apparently inﬂuenced by the E and may be described as being suggestible or acquiescent. The failure of the convulsive $5 to establish a set which
persisted for prolonged intervals of time, as did the subconvulsive SS, sugS’s
If
convulsive
from
effect
derived
for
the
basis
therapy.
a
therapeutic
gests
such
mental
set,
an interpretation
as
a
pathological,
regarded
are
symptoms
is particularly appropriate. From the point of view of concepts of mental
set, the effect of induced convulsions is to bring about a disruption of
maladaptive patterns of behavior.
The number of displacement-errors remained the same regardless of
whether an inquiry was made. These errors occurred much less frequently
than confabulations. During treatment, approximately 30% of the convulsive $5 of both the ‘inquiry’ and ‘no inquiry’ groups responded with at
least one displacement. This ﬁnding compares closely with the results of
33% with displacements obtained in a study of a similar population of
Hyman Korin, Max Fink, and S. Kwalwasser, Relation of changes in memory
and learning to improvement in electroshock. Conf. Neurol., 16, 1956, 88-96; Max
Fink, R. L. Kahn. and Hyman Korin, Effects of diffuse altered brain function on
XV C(mf. of Pryc/ool. Proceed, 1958, 238—239.
perception.
1“
Fink, Kahn, and Green, Experimental studies of the electroshock process, Dir.
New. $315., 19, 1958, 113-118.
’3

�SIMULTANEOUS TACTILE STIMULI

391

electroshock Ss in which touch-stimuli were applied by the clinical method.
Errors of displacement are not a prominent type of error in an electroshock population.
With regard to errors of extinction, differences were not signiﬁcant
between the ‘inquiry’ and ‘no inquiry’ groups. The high number of errors
of extinction before treatment and the subsequent decrease in errors during
treatment, noted in this study, is in contrast to the results obtained with
clinical tactile techniques. If clinical methods are used, few errors of
extinction are elicited before treatment and there is a marked increase in
error during treatment. The results obtained in this study are probably
related to the initial diﬂiculty experienced by Ss in perceiving electrical
stimuli at threshold and the rapid adaptation to the technique in further
testing. These factors play a greater role than the changes induced by the
treatment.
In initial studies with threshold electrical stimuli, it was believed that a
more sensitive test of changes in brain-function than the clinical tactile
method could be devised.15 For clinical purposes, however, the perceptual
patterns obtained with electrical stimulation lack sufﬁcient discriminability
as indices of brain dysfunction. In part, the deficiencies of the method may
be ascribed to the necessity for using ﬁxed electrodes and limitations in
switching arrangements at threshold. For clinical testing, therefore, simultaneous tactile stimuli applied rapidly in a varied sequence remains the
best index of altered brain function.1‘6
Summary and conclmiom. This study of the perception of simultaneously
applied tactile stimuli was undertaken to determine the relation between
the frequency of perceptual errors to the inquiry made by E. The relations
among inquiry, perceptual response, and the degree of brain dysfunction
were also considered.

In the test-procedure, the threshold (100% point) for square-wave
electrical stimuli applied to the hand and cheek of 61 psychiatric patients
was determined. Sequences of two simultaneous and single stimuli were
applied in a mixed order for the hand and cheek (heterologous stimulation) and both cheeks (homologous stimulation). Heterologous and homologous trials were alternated for each patient. For one group, an inquiry
was made following each response to a stimulation, while in a second
15
16

217.

Fink, Green, and Bender, op. (13., 46-58.
Green and Fink, Standardization of the face-hand test, Neurology, 4, 1954, 211-

�392

KORIN AND FINK

convulsive
55
treated
either
made.
or
The
by
were
was
no
inquiry
group,
subconvulsive courses of therapy, at three times a week for 12—20 applications.
There was a signiﬁcant relationship between the frequency of confabulatory errors and the inquiry (suggestion-induced set’) in both convulsive and subconvulsive patients. The confabulatory tendencies of these
patients, however, differed greatly. Although the errors for both increased
during treatment, errors decreased after treatment for the convulsive
differfurther.
increased
The
subconvulsive
but
in
the
errors
group
group,
ences between 'inquiry’ and 'no inquiry’ groups with regard to errors of
extinction or displacement were insigniﬁcant. In 'convulsive-inquiry’ 55,
the confabulatory errors of those with high degrees of EEG slow-wave
activity were signiﬁcantly more frequent than those with a low or moderate
degrees of slow wave activity.
The results of this study lead to the following conclusions:
(1) In tests with simultaneous electrical tactile stimuli the number of
confabulatory errors is related to an induced set suggested by ES inquiry.
(2 ) The number of confabultory errors is increased in $5 with braindysfunction in relation to an inquiry, but may also be induced in patients
without brain-dysfunction who are acquiescent and susceptible to suggestion.
(3) The frequency of errors of displacement or extinction is not related
to the ‘inquiry’ procedure.

��”era

Role of Stimulus Intensity

in Perception

of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli

Hyman

Karin,

H!» on.

and
max

From
ELY.

ﬁnk,

MOD.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by

Institute
10-9 ’57

of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
of Health, 11.5. Public Health Service.

grant

M—927

.M/J- I
44/ f7

�III:
Role of Stimulus

10/9/57

Intensity in Perception

of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli
and his coIn the course of the extensive investigations by Bender
stimuli,
workers (1, 2, 3,) into the perception of multiple simultaneous

of two stimuli
the pattern of failure of subjects to accurately report one
Since
led to a concept of an "order of dominance" in cutaneous perception.
dominance to biologic and
then, the relationShip of the observed pattern of
been the subject of
psychiatric concepts of body image and body scheme has

considerable speculation (h, 7, 8, 1h).
The

interrelationship of

body areas was

initially clearly

demonstrated

was noted
in simultaneous tactile tests of face and hand (2) in which it
that the stimuli to the hand were frequently not reported or mislocalized.
inference
These phenomena of "extinction" and "displacement“ led to the

that cheek area stimuli were "dominant" to
reports, Bender, Pink
inance for

and Green (3, 10,

tactile stimuli in

ll,

fell

stimuli.

In subsequent

12) described a

pattern of

dom-

which the face and the primary genital areas

were the most perceptive or dominant body

dominant; and the shoulder,

hand

areas; the

hand was the

foot, buttock, breast, back, thigh,

between these extremes in a mild gradient.

least

and abdomen

These observations were made

were most
in normal adults and children and psychiatric patients, but
the major portion
clearly discerned in patients with brain disease. Indeed,

of the data

relates to a

group of

patients with severe diffuse brain dys-

function under observation in a general psychiatric hospital.
Bender,
The basis for these phenomena is unclear. In their review,
Green and Fink

(3), after considering hypotheses ascribing significance to

and neurophysiologic
anatomic, psychophysiologic, genetic, environmental

�i

"no one theory‘adequately explains the organization

factors, conclude that
of

.2-

this pattern. Learning and maturation are probably factors, but

appears to be mostly inherent."

brain disease

and normal young

it

(h, 5), in studies of patients with

Cohn

children, emphasized the rostral order of

significance to "an ontogenetic or phylogenetic
thalamic residue in the sensory organization of the human brain." He noted
specifically, also, that this pattern was primarily associated with "the

dominance and ascribed

over-all sentient function of the brain."
A

elaboration of a maturational

more extensive

and developmental

explanation of the order of dominance was proposed by Linn (1h). Taking
the infantile patterns of sucking and feeding as a model, Linn ascribes
primitiveness in the development of the body image;
the dominant role of the genital area to the intensity of pleasurable sensation that the infant elicits from masturbation; and the subordinate position

face dominance to

role as an exploring and tension-relieving appendage
holds second place in awareness to its stimulation of the more

of the hand to

it

wherein

exciting
A

its

its

mouth and

genitalia.

neurophysiologic view was advanced by Critchley (6, 7),

who

after

expressing a preference for the term "tactile inattention" instead of
"extinction," emphasized the rostral order of dominance. He stated that
"strong stimulation of the healthy side suppresses the attentuated sensations
on the impaired

side,"

patients is probably

no more than an

which may be demonstrated

besides the

tactile -

that "tactile inattention in parietal

and concluded

instance of local neglect or disregard,

at times in

many

other spheres of consciousness

whether motor, visual or

spatial."

�.3...
A

psychophysiologic explanation

workers (10, 11), who found no

tactile threshold for

was eschewed by Bender and

relation between the order of

touch or pin prick.

(8), however, insisted that these patterns
an

overcome by

were only apparent when
They

hand stimulus by a stimulus

four stimuli to the hand.

dominance and

Denny-Brown, Meyer and Horenstein

alteration or loss of two-point discrimination.

that the extinction of the

his co-

The dominance

there

was

further demonstrated

to the leg could be

of the cheek to the hand

could not, however, be altered by ten stimuli to the hand.

following data further emphasizes psychophysiologic factors. These

The

studies represent the

initial report

of the technic of simultaneous

hand of

tactile stimulation tests to the

alteration in brain function induced

measurment of the

In the course of

of an investigation into the application
problem of

by electroshock therapy.

this study electrical stimuli were applied to the cheek and

psychiatric patients. Stimuli

were

either at threshold or supra-

threshold levels.
Two

(a)

aspects of the data are presented:
The

effect of alteration of relative strength of stimulus in the

order of dominance
(b)
:3va JECTS

The

on

face-hand tests; and

Relation of perceptual thresholds to the order of dominance.

ms

I-‘IETHOD:

subjects were

electroshock therapy.
mean age was

3h

consecutive psychiatric patients referred for

The range of

their ages

was between 21 and 65 and the

h5. Eleven patients were diagnosed as involutional melancholia,

thirteen as manic-depressive, depressed, eight as schizophrenia,and

two as

psychoneurosis mixed type. All testing was done prior to a course of electro-

�.11..

shock therapy and no patient had

clinical or

EEG

evidence of altered

brain function.
Two

model

S—hB

Grass squareswave stimulators were synchronized to

deliver either single or
unit

was connected

was monitored

two simultaneous

electrical stimuli.

to each stimulator to eliminate artifacts

visually by an oscilloscope.

A

An

isolation

and the output

switch bdx inserted in the

circuit permitted independent selection of the various body parts. An active
and an indifferent electrode required for each body part were small 3/8"
steel discs placed

1"

apart

and secured with

tape. Bentonite electrode

paste (Medcraft) was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes
were applied.

patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine pbsiticn..
To alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described.
It was
emphasized that only a slight tap-like sensation would be felt. The electrodes
The

were then placed on (1) the dorsum of the hands, (2) the mandibular area of

both cheeks and (3) the medial calf area of the legs.
In the

testing procedure, thresholds for the various

first determined. At
50

body

parts

were

a frequency of .3 cycles/second, and a pulse duration of

milliseconds, the voltage

was increased

in uniform time increments of .67

seconds (2 pulses) monitored from the oscilloscope,

ceived 100 percent of the stimuli. Increments of
hand and increments of 1

5

until the subject pervolts were applied to the

volt to the cheeks. After a ten second interval,

until sensation disappeared.' After another ten
second interval, the voltage was gradually increased by 1 volt each 6 seconds
until the patient reported 100 percent of the stimuli again. This reading was
the voltage was decreased

considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold sensation.

�-5-

and

After the thresholds were determined, testing with a series of single
double simultaneous stimuli followed. The body parts tested were the

right
and

hand and

left

left

cheek (heterologous stimulation) and the

cheek homologous stimulation).

taneously or

one

part singly in a

Both

mixed order

parts

right cheek

were stimulated simul-

for ten trials for each of

the iollowing conditions:(l) threshold (2) suprathreshold (10 percent above
the threshold), (3) one body part at suprathreshold and the other at threshold
and (h) the reverse

(3).

The

order of presentation of conditions (1) and (2)

for conditions (3)

was

alternated for different subjects

and

(h). Similarly the order of presentation of the heterologous

logous stimulation was

and the same was done

and homo-

alternated.

Single stimuli were introduced as a control. Failure to report the
single stimulus indicated that the threshold had changed.
occurred, stimulation was increased until a
and 10

new

threshold

When

this change

was determined

trails were started anew.

RESULTS:

A.

Threshold Values.

The

threshold stimulation for perception

cheeks and legs. (Table

for the hands,

was determined

I).
TABLE

Mean Thresholds and

I

Standard Deviations

of Body Parts
Right

Hand

Hand

Left

Right

Left

7.85

29.25

22.35

2h.50

19.52

h.86

1h.88

'13.60

13.99

Left

Cheek

Cheek

Threshold (volts)

6.76

Standard Deviation

h.h7

Mean

Right

Leg

Leg

'

13.6h

�~6The

threshold values for the hands and legs are

3

to

h times higher than

the thresholds for the cheeks. While the threshold values in the legs are

less than in the hands, these differences lack statistical significance.
Variability of the threshold is considerably greater in the hands and legs,
than in the cheeks. There

is virtually

no overlapping of

thresholds,

however, where the cheeks and the hands are concerned.
B.

Extinction Patterns:

difference between the

The

or the

left

number of

extinctions of the right

cheek on stimulation of both parts with

hand

either threshold or

suprathreshold stimuli was not significant (Table II). Also, when both
cheeks were stimulated with either threshold or suprathreshold stimuli,
there were no differences in the number of extinctionszhzeach cheek .
(Table

III).

In contrast to these observations, stimulating one body part with a

suprathreshold stimulus and the other

at threshold, resulted in

a significant

increase in the failure to report the body part stimulated at threshold.
Thus the cheek was dominant over the hand, or the hand was dominant over
the cheek depending on the body part to which the stronger stimulus was

applied (Table

II). Altering the relative strength

of the stimuli applied

to the cheeks resulted in a similar predictable change in the pattern of
dominance (Table

III).

Further analysis of the data in Table

II indicates that the

hand was

dominant over the cheek with greater mean frequency (2.08) than the cheek
was dominant over the hand (1.0h)

for the threshold - suprathreshold

condition. This tendency is also evident

at suprathreshold.

If

it is

considereﬁ

when both

that the

parts were stimulated

mean

threshold for the hands

�mua

mama

mmbn

mmma
nwmmw

eUHmmwowa
mmeOWmmw

ma

mmuo

m&amp;

ma

mcwuwdwwmmwowa

mﬁ

mum

mum

oﬁmmw

oummw

ﬁn

pa

mcmumwuwmmuowm

mcvumdunmmuowa

eﬁﬂmmUowa
awnmmwowa

Kama

counudwoum

ow
.wm

m.wo

H.0m

zwmb

H.ww

nummw
mxdwunawoum

ow
mxaqudMosm

aﬁammwowo

om

saws

ow
H.wm

.mm

.mm

abwbm

mum

H.mm

cummw

-mma

mmuo

HH

madusodwoum

mun

mcwwpdwummwowa

mmum

mow

v.0:

m.om

.m4

.OH
&lt;muwwnm
dwwwmwmuom

mwwe:Hdeou

z.m.
wAAuow

vAnuow

2.m.

mwmswwwombom

�Emma

abomw

Hmwﬁ

wear

wumue

wows

avummuowm

drummvown

ma

mcwuwawuwmwowm

mchm&amp;UHmmwowm

owmmw

oﬁmmw
numGWm

owwmwm

ma

ma

QUGmW

mum

mw

ma

ma

grammwowa

meU&amp;

mum

mcvum:
awnmmuowm

on
.om

.wm

.Hm

.ww

saws

nonmwdHOUm

Hmwd
mxwucnduoam

Kama

Qummw

ow
mxauuodwoum

awwmmwowm

on

ow
3mm:
avwbm

H.mm

.H#

.w4

.rw

mum
mumwﬁ

.

mxwwannwoum

md
woaw.nwmme

owmmw

mcwumauammUowo

won

&lt;muewum

H.mm

.mm

.Hm

.om

wanmuwuom

mdwstwmawou

u‘AmoH

v_Auom

z.m.

z.m.
mumsuwwnmbnm

HHH

-

�-7-

is approximately 30 volts, while for the
the difference

in incidence of extinction

stimulation was set at ten percent

may

be explained.

above the threshold

stimulus was therefore increased by

3

is

cheeks the threshold

volts

7

volts,

Suprathreshold

value.

The hand

and the face stimulus by only

increase, although proportionately
equivalent, appears to have given greater relative strength to the hand

1

volt

above the threshold value.

Such an

stimulus.
C.

Incidence of Extinction:
Regardless of pattern, the

mean

total of the

number of

extinctions

heterologous body parts were stimulated at threshold than
when these parts were stimulated with suprathreshold stimuli (Table IV).
For these same conditions of stimulation the differences between the mean

was

greater

number of

when

extinctions obtained

on homologous

stimulation of the cheeks lack

statistical significance but the results are in the direction
that a greater

number

of extinctions occur

when two body

which indicate

parts are stimulated

at threshold (Table IV). The failure to obtain a significant difference in
the latter instance is partly due to the fact that relatively few extinctions
are elicited

total

when homologous

number of

parts are stimulated.

These findings on the

extinctions are in agreement with previous observations (2).

�2.
TABLE

Mean

IV

of Combined Number of extinctions

For Varying Conditions of Threshold
and Suprathreshold

Both

Parts at

Threshold

A

-

Cheek

B

—

Band

A

- Left

B

- Right

%

Cheek
Cheek

Both Parts

SuprathreShold

3.11

1.63

.85

.56

Differences between the

at

mean number of

%

Stimuli

A
B

- SuprathreShold
- Threshold

A
B

1.68

1.31

extinctions at threshold

- Threshold
—

2oh3

1.10

and

the other three conditions of stimulation are significant for the
cheek and hand but are insignificant for both cheeks.

SupraThreshold

�-8DISCUSSION:

pattern of extinction following stimulation.with threshold and
suprathreshold stimuli has been determined. In contrast to the findings
The

of Bender, link and Green (2), face stimuli were not reported more frequently
than hand stimuli when either simultaneous threShold or suprathreshold

stimuli were applied.

Under these

conditions, neverthless,

it is

clear that

the pattern.of extinction for any the body parts can be readily altered by
stimulus
varying the relative strength of the stimuli. Thus,a suprathreshold
applied to the hand tends to obscure a threshold stimulus applied to the
cheek and when these stimuli

intensities are reversed, the cheek tends to

obscure the hand.

Theories which hold that dominance of the cheek over the hand

is

due

to an inherent factor, perceived body image, rostral dominance, developmental
principle, or a learned factor, are not supported by these observations. If
any of these

been

elicited

factors were involved, a pattern of face
when

dominance should have

the hand and cheek were stimulated with equivalent

stimuli at threshold

and suprathreshold

intensities.

Although, more recently, Bender (3) has advanced an inherent factor

theory, he previously attributed the extinction phenomenon to differences
in the thresholds of the various body parts and to the intensity of the

stimulation used (1),
strength of the

The

finding. in this study, that differences in the

simu taneous

stimuli

can

supports a stimulus intensity hypothesis.

alter the pattern
By

of extinction

inference, differences in

threshold also play a significant role.
That an intense stimulus elsewhere could raise the pain threshold as
This
much as 35% has been denonstrated by Hardy, Wolf and Goodell (13).

�-9:-

effect of a relatively intense stimulus

on the

threshold of another

stimulus has also been found by investigators using other stimuli (8, 9).
The problem

still

remains, however, how

it

is that

a

pattern of dominance,

particularly of the hierarchy determined by Bender and his coworkers, may
be elicited when presumably equivalent stimuli are applied by touch of hand.
The results of this study suggest an explanation. Stimuli of differing
intensities are required to elicit a threshold sensation for various body
parts.

’Uhen

these stimuli are increased 10 percent, the resultant stimuli

are proportional and are perceived as equivalent. In contrast, in clinically
touching two body parts, the stimuli are disproportionate relative to the
threshold value although approximately of equal intensity in their application.

differences in threShold for the hand and cheek, the tactile
to the cheek
stimulus/is proportionately more above the threshold than the stimulus to the
hand. Thus the cheek is perceived more frequently than the hand stimulus and

Because of the

has been considered "dominant."
A

threshold hypothesis was rejected (3)

on

the basis that the thresholds

for pressure and pain do not strictly corre5pond
to the dominance order elicited by the double simultaneous stimulation tests.
Most difficult to reconcile is Von Frey's finding that the pressure threshold
obtained by

Von Frey (16)

of the glans penis, which

is

second in dominance rank only to the cheek in

tested, is 111 grams per square millimeter; While
the hand, whichzislll least dominant, is only 12 grams per

a group of ten body parts

the threshold of

square millimeter.

Unfortunately, thresholds in the genital area for male and female have
seldom been determined. Von Frey's list of thresholds (16) is based on a

single subject.

His more

detailed observations (17), however, indicate that

�.10-

is virtually

there

no pressure sense

the perception of pain, warmth, and

in the glans penis or clitoris, although
cold is well developed. It is quite

with touch
possible that the punctate pressure threshold does not correlate
there the genital area is concerned but that instead some other sense or
combination of senses
Thresholds
and

is involved.

for the

dorsum

of the

hand and the cheek obtained by Von Frey

other investigators indicate that the cheek

is

considerably more sensitive

in agreement with the thresholds obtained
in this study. In a recent study of thresholds at various body sites Sigel
than the hand. These findings are

dorsum of the
(15) reported that "leg areas including thigh and ankle, also

definite tendency for higher thresholds. Scalp,
The anterior chest
temple, forehead and face tended to have lower thresholds.
lower thresholds.
arm and anterior wrist areas showed a tendency for
and

hands and the palm showed a

upper

Neck

areas,

ment

there

Bender and

abdomen and upper back showed no

is

no disagreement with

definite trend." In this state-

the order of

dominance as determined by

his coworkers.

the experimental results obtained here, it is proposed that the
may
dominance hierarchy elicited under the conditions of simultaneous testing
of the
be explained in rational terms on the basis of the relative strength
From

stimuli

and the area stimulus

theoretic constructs:n

threshold, without the invocation of other

�-llSUM-JURY:

Using square wave
the hands, cheeks, and

electrical stimuli, the threshold for perception in
calves were detennined in 3h psychiatric patients.

Simultaneous stimuli were applied in random sequence to combinations of
cheek and hand and both cheeks,

at threshold, suprathreshold

and combinations

of threshold and suprathreshold intensities.

MWSmmmmwsmmwdmcrﬁmhwmwswmmmwddmmmwwm
the differences between the number of extinctions in either part were NOT
significant. With stimuli of unequal intensity, however, (one stimulus at
threshold and one suprathreshold) there

was a

significant increase in the

failure to report the threshold stimulus.
The total number of extinctions is greater with threshold, than with
suprathreshold stimuli; ans greater in heterologous than in homologous

patterns of stimulation.
LOPELEQ-‘Pist

The

tests

may

clinically observed order of

dominance

in simultaneous tactile

he explained by psychophysiological phenomena without

resort

to theoretic constructs. Differences in the hireshold of perception in
various body parts provide the basis for the observed pattern of errors on
simultaneous

tactile tests at suprathreshold levels,

�Biblio ranhv
1.

W“

Bender, M;B. (1952): Disorders in Perception Sprin
Bender, HgB., Fink,

M;

and Green, M.A. (1951): Patterns in Perception

Tests of Face

on Simultaneous

field, Illinois.

and Hand, A.M.A: Arch.

Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. éé} 355-362.
3.

Bender, H.B., Green, H.A. and Fink,

M.

(l95h): Patterns of Perceptual

Organization with Simultaneous Stimuli,
EgyChiat.,

Neurol. n

lg: 233-255.

Cohn, R. (1951): On Certain Aspects of
Human

A.M.A. Arch.

Brain:

A

the Sensory Organization of the

Study in Rostral Dominance as Determined by

Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation, J. Nerv:

Ment. Dis. 113:

h71~h8h.

S.

Cohn, R. (1951):

On

Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the

Brain:

II

—

Human

A

Study

in Rostral

Dominance

in Children,

Neuroloav, 1; 119-122.

Critchley, n. (1953):
Critchley,

M.

The

Parietal Lobes,

a

Go.

(19h9): Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special

Reference to Earietal Lesions.
Denny-Brown,

London: Edward Arnold

3.,

Meyer,

J.S:

grain, 12: 538-561.

and Horenstein, S. (1952): The Significance

of Perceptual Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion, grain, 15;
h33~h7la

9.

Dunoker, K. (1937): Some Preliminary Exneriments on the Mutual Influence

of Seine, Psychpl. Forsdh, g1: 311-326.

10.

Fink,

M.

and Bender, H.E. (1953): Perception of Simultaneous

Stimuli in Normal ChilCren, 1-Ieurologq,

;:

27~3h.

Tactile

�Bibliograghv
11. Fink, H., Green,

M.A. and Bender, M.D. (1953):

Perception of Simultaneous

Tactile Stimuli

by Mentally Defective Subjects,

gig. , Q1:

.

LLB-449

12. Fink, M., Green,

M.A. and Bender, M.B.

J.

Merv.

&amp;

Ment.

(l952):The Face-Hand Test as a

Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental 85ndrome, Neurologz, g; hé-SB.
13.

Haroy, J.D., wolf, H.S. and Goodall, H. (19h0): Studies on Pain.
New

Method

for measuring Pain Threshold: Observations

Summation of Pain,

J. Clin. Invest., l2:

on

A

Spatial

6&amp;9-658.

Linn, L. (1955): Some Developmental Aspects of the Body Image, 223!

J. Eszchoana1., 2g; 1-7.

Sigel,

H. (1952): Cutaneous Sensory Threshold

Frequency Squareédave Current:

Site

II. -

The

Stimulation with High
Relationship of

and Skin Diseases to the Seesory Threshold,

Body

J. Invest. Derm.,

lg: hh7-h51.
16. Von Frey, E. (189M): Beitrage zur Physiologie des Schmerzinns, Egg.

Sachs. Ges.
17.

diss.,

Von Frey, M. (1895):

gé: 185-196 and 283-296.

Beitrege znr sinnephysiologie Haut, Ber. Sachs.

99g. ‘L;iss., £2: 166-18u.

�Karin: Amer. J. Psychol.
VI: 8-12-58

Role of Suggestion-Induced Set

in the Perception of

Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli

Hyman

Korin.fh.D.
and

max Fink M.D.

From the Department of Experimental Paychiatry,

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks,

L.I.,

(in part) by grant 14-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.
Read at the Eastern PSydhological AsSOCiation, Philadelphia, April 11, 1958.

Aided

N.Y.

�Role of Suggestion-Induced Set

in the Perception of

Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli

influential role of "mental set" in determining subject response
to a perceptual task has been well documented (1). In studies of the
The

perception of simultaneous

tactile stimuli, various patterns of response

were observed which seemed

to

be

the result of "suggestion-induced set."

This investigation was undertaken, to determine the

different conditions of "set"

relation between

and the frequency and type

of perceptual

error elicited in tests with simultaneous stimuli.
Recently the advantages of the simultaneous stimulation of body parts

in tactile perceptual tests has been stressed (2).
simultaneous stimulation may

elicit

The

technique of

perceptual errors under conditions in

which successive single stimuli are correctly perceived.

'are applied to

body

parts at the

same

time, for example, only

may be

reported -

may be

perceived correctly and the other'mislocalized

an

error referred to as "extinction"; or

"displacement." Uccasionally,

if

testing sequence, these stimuli

-

stimuli

two

stimulus

one

one stimulus

error called
single stimuli are interspersed in the

may be

an

correctly reported, but an additional,

extraneous stimulus, (referred to as a "confabulation")
Such

‘When

errors of extinction, displacement,

may

also

and confabulation are

be

reported.

significantly

increased in patients with brain dysfunction.

1.

R. Leeper, Cognitive processes, in 5.5. Stevens,
Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 1951.

2.

M.

B. Bender, Disorders

in Perception,

1952; Bender,

Patterns of perceptual organization
with simultaneous stimuli; A.M.A. Arch. Neurgl. &amp; Psychiat.
M.A. Green and M. Fink,

1g: 195h, 233-255; Fink, Green and Bender. The face hand
test as a diagnostic sign of organic mental syndrome, Neurcl.
g: 1952, h6—58.

�.2errors of extinction and diaplacement occur, they are elicited in
a consistent pattern. Thus, on stimulation of the hand and face, the
stimulus to the face is usually reported correctly while that to the hand
When

is mislocalized or not reported.
parts, an "order of
and

testing various combinations of

dominance" may be described

genital areas are

often perceived.

By

in

which

body

stimuli to the face

most often perceived and those to the hand are

least

stimuli to the shoulder, foot,
are perceived in a gradient (3).

Between these extremes,

buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen

Theories inyolving factors of rostral dominance (h), maturation (S),

inattention (6),

and

inherent

body image (7) have been advanced

to explain

the organization of these perceptual patterns, but no one theory has adequately
explained

all

the facts.

Previously (8)

we

have ascribed

significance to the

relative intensity of the stimuli and the threshold value in the frequency
and the pattern of the "extinction" error, when electrical stimuli are applied
3. Bender,

h.

Green and Fink, 02.

cit.,

233-255.

certain aspects of the sensory organization of
the
brain. I: A study in rostral dominance as
determined by ipsilateral simultaneous stimulation, g,
Nerv. Ment. Dis. Eli: 1951, h7l-h8h; II: A study in rostral
dominance in children, 32339;. I, 1951, 110-122.
R. Cohn, On
human

S. Linn, Louis: Some developnental aspects of the body images,
Int. Jour. Psychoanal. 2gp 1955, 1-7.

6.

Critchley, The phenomena of tactile inattention with
specific references to parietal lesions, Brain 1;, l9h9, 538-561.

M.

_

7. Rnder,
8.

Op.

Cite, 77-88.

Fink, Role of stimulus intensity in perception
of simultaneous electrical cutaneous stimuli, J. Hillside Hosp.

H. Korin and M.
Q,

1957, 2&amp;1-250.

�.3threshold and suprathreshold intensities. The present study was undertaken
to assess the-relation between "suggestion-induced set" and errors of
confaoulaticn and diSplacement.

The

Specific problem studied

is

whether

in the testing procedure is significantly related to the
frequency and type of these errors. Since these errors are most prominent
an "inquiry"

in Subjects with cerebral dysfunction, patients undergoing convulsive and
subconvulsive therapies were studied.

Subjects:
The

subjects

were 61 consecutive psychotic

electroconvulsive therapy.

patients referred for

Their ages ranged between

21 and 67 and

the

ho. Thirty-seven patients received convulsive therapy, While
fourteen first received subconvulsive therapy and then were transferred to

mean age was

convulsive therapy.

Ten

patients were treated with subconvulsive therapy

only. Patients were selected for the convulsive or subconvulsive treatment
on a random

basis by the supervising psychiatrist.

�Procedure:
Two

model S-hB Grass squaredwave

stimulators

were synchronized to

deliver either single or simultaneous electrical stimuli. An isolation
unit was connected with each stimulator to eliminate artifacts and the
output was visually monitored by an oscilloscope.

A

switch box was inserted

in the circuit to permit independent selection of the various body parts.
The active and indifferent electrodes for each body part were small 3/8"
steel discs, placed 1" apart and secured with tape. Bentonite electrode
paste was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes were

applied.
The

patient

was placed on a couch

in a relaxed

and supine

position.

alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described. It
was emphasized that a slight tap-like sensation.would be felt. The electrodes
To

were then placed on (a) the dorsum of the hands, (b) the mandibular area of

both cheeks and (c) the medial aspect of the calves of the legs.
Thresholds

for the various

body

parts were

first

determined. At a

frequency of .3 cycles per second and a pulse duration of
the voltage was increased

in

SO

millbeccnds,

uniform increments of five volts to the hands

volt to the cheeks every 6.7 seconds (2 pulses) until the subject
perceived 100 per cent of the stimuli. After a ten second interval, voltages
and One

were decreased
second

until the sensation

was no longer

interval, voltages were increased

patient again reported

100

by 1

reported. After another ten

volt every

6 seconds

per cent of the stimuli. This reading

until the

was

considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold sensation.

After thresholds
h

single

were

were determined,

and 6 double simultaneous

the right hand

and

left

testing with a

random

stimuli followed. In

body

series of

parts tested

cheek (heterologous stimulation) and the

right

�-scheek and

left

cheek (homologous stimulation).

Stimuli were applied
either simultaneously or to one part singly, in a mixed order for ten

trials

(Table

homologous

I).

The

order of presentation of the heterologous and

stimulation was alternated.
TABLE

I

Failure to report the interSpersed single stimuli served as an index

that the perceptual threshold had changed. Such a change occurred infrequently, and at these times the threShold was again determined, and the
10

testing trials

were

repeated.

patients

were

tested in

The

"no-inquiry" group.

The

and nine'subconvulsive

two groups: an "inquiry" group and a

"inquiry“ group, consisting of 2h convulsive

subjects,

was asked the question-"anywhere

after each responseto a stimulation.

No

question

"no-inquiry" group, which consisted of

27

convulsive and

was asked

else"

of the

15 suboonvulsive

patients. This total exceeds 61, since one patient in the inquiry group
and thirteen in the no-inquiry group were included both in the convulsive
and the subconvulsive

series.

Electroencephalograms were obtained
day following a

treatment.

in each patient weekly

These records were

quantitatively

for the degree of induced leW'wave (delta) activity (9).

on the

meaSured

Both

the

convulsive and the subconvulsive treatments were administered three times
weekly on alternate days.

9.

Pink and R.L. Kahn, Relation of EEG delta activity
to behavioral reSponse in electroshock: Quantitative
serial studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 78

M.

1957: 516‘525 o

�TABLE

I

Order of Presentation of Stimuli

Right Hand

Left

Cheek

Right Cheek

Left

Cheek

'Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek

Right hand

Right cheekéLeft cheek

Left cheek

Left cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek-Left cheek

Left cheek

Right cheek-Left cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Left cheek

Right hand

Right cheek-Left cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek

Right hand-Left cheek

Right cheek-Left cheek

�“HW1

Results:
A.
two

Confabulation Error:

stimuli were reported

A

reaponse was scored as a confabulation

when only a

single stimulus

was

applied.

if

The

II.

observations are noted in Table

TmBLE

Convulsive vs Subconvulsive:

II
Confabulatory errors were elicited

pretreatment both in the convulsive and the subconvulsive patients. During
treatment the errors increased with approximately the same frequency. The

in the convulsive treated patients and
from .22 to .70 in the subconvulsive treated patients. Post-treatment,

mean

error increased from .08 to

.72

however, the mean number of confabuLations persisted in the subconvulsive

patients (1.00) but declined in the convulsive patients (.10). The difference
in number of errors between the convulsive and subconvulsive groups is

significant post-treatment, but not in either the pretreatment or treatment
periods.
In the no-inquiry group few confabulations occurred at

any

interval

of testing for either the convulsive or the subccnvulsive patients.
Inquiry vs No-Inquiry:

While the differences

in the

mean number

of errors reported by the subconvulsive and the convulsive patients lacks

'significance pretreatment, that between the subconvulsive inquiry differed
significantly from the subconvulsive no-inquiry patients. During treatment
the number df confabulations increased, and this difference

in a comparison of the inquiry

and

is significant

the no-inquiry procedures, both in the

convulsive and subconvulsive groups. These differences during the treatment

interval are based

on the

of the inquiry group.

substantial increase in the

number of confabulations

�Hangs».
Wmdgmgmﬁ

womduagmggd

Ex»

%
dwm

awm

mmdm

*

.1.

6

u

w

.8.

.8.

.8

A

A

km

.8

Zn»:

conqspmw&lt;m

A
Huncwnw

Foo

mum

mumswwwomsom.

.8

moouwm.

.8

.mm

.E

o

2%
mucoouaﬁwmw&lt;w

3M55L23H¢3m%

duo

awm
mm¢m

ac:

.8

swwow

zaps

zug
oon&lt;deH&lt;m

mwwwmwmsomm

domd

zusvoa

zongncwuw
mowwoz.

AHNV

n

cwwtmmu

swm

.om

0

ow

zuwm

Hpmnm
mscoonqswmw&lt;m

Iml
mwbnm

HH
smmsm

mvuPHmm

oouwmcspmdwob

awn

muw

ad: we

onww

.8

wome

.3

.0m

Hunmwuq.
oouaﬁwqum

ZonHunnMHw

Upwwmwmbom

«ama

wuwowm

.3.
wm

mou

mwommpw

%
dmmma

u

.0m

.3

Hupswﬂw.
ZouHunswww

dwawmuobom

mzwoqachqum
mwmbwmwombom

HmHmdma

on

5.

is

Hmbw

ac
wow
enamw
Hm4mH

.8
*

éwmmm

ow

om

.8

.E

Hunzwaw

wawmambom
mayooudcpmw&lt;m

oon&lt;¢wqumu

mguooudcwqum

oos&lt;sHmH4m.

-

u

.oo

o

zoquncwuw

uwwmmambnm

�-9After the course of therapy, the confabulations of the convulsive
inquiry patients decreased to the pretreatment level,
between the convulsive inquiry and no-inquiry groups

not significant. In contrast, the

mean number

and

differences

at this time

were

of errors of the subconvulsive

inquiry patients increased. Data for the post-treatment subconvulsive

no-inquiry group was not available as these patients
to convulsive treatment
A

and were not

were

usually transferred

available for post-treatment tests.

comparison between the inquiry and no-inquiry subconvulsive patients

post-treatment cannot be made.
B.

Displacement Error:

one of two

stimuli

was reported

A

reSponse was scored as a displacement

correctly

and the

other

was

if

mislocalized.

rarely elicited in any of the greups (Table III).
of displacements tended to be greater, however, during

Displacements were
The mean number

treatment for the convulsive patients but the differences from the pretreatment interval lack significance.

�—10‘TABLE

mean Number

III

of Digplacement Errors
Convulsive
No-Inqyiry

Inquiry

Subconvulsive
No-Inquiry

Inquiry

Pretreatment

.06

.07

0

Treatment

.09

.10

.02

.01

Post-Treatment

.08

.02

.06

0

Inter

and

intra

group differences are not significant

0

at any interval.

�-llC.

Extinction Error:

An

error

one of two simultaneously applied

stimuli

extinction error between the inquiry

at

any

scored as an "extinction"

was

reported.

was

if

only

difference in

The

and no-inquiry groups was not

significant

interval during the course of therapy both for the convulsive and

subconvulsive patients (Table IV). During treatment, the mean number of

extinctions decreased in all groups.

this interval, the difference

At

between the convulsive and subconvulsive inquiry patients was

Postetreatment the errors of
D. Confabulation
number

Error

all
and

significant.

the groups decreased further.
EEG

Change; An

analysis

was made of the

of confabulation errors elicited in convulsive patients in relation
Inquiry patients with high

to the degree of encephalographic change.
degrees of delta activity

made

significantly more confabulation errors

than inquiry patients with moderate and low degrees of delta activity.
(Table V), while few errors were reported in the no-inquiry patients

regardless of the degree of
and low EEG

inquiry groups

EEG

was

change.

The mean

similar to the

score of the moderate

mean

scores of the no-inquiry
‘

patients.
No EEG

slow wave

subconvulsive

activity or

patients.

number of confabulation

significantly during

low degrees of such

occurred

activity/in the

However, as had previously been

indicated, the

errors of the subconvulsive group increased

and

after treatment.

increasing confabulation errors in four

This increase resulted from

of the nine

Pqu-u-u-Iu-o-O-u ‘-

patients.

�eaﬂsma
Wmﬁmﬁﬁa
womdlawmmdsmuw

H.w&lt;

PS

who

2n»:

ooudswmwdm

.x.

annwnw

6A.
.mw

FE

”7%

zuw
mﬁdaobdspmwdo

00“

:wms

H.rr

fﬁ

mid
Zamq
ZdSUmH

oosagHmH&lt;m

ow
zoquncHHw

wabm

I

VB

PS

spun
mdeHOdHob

zuHm
mscoos&lt;¢wmw&lt;w

H&lt;

muaoum

.ON

.3

.8

Huncwuwu

oon&lt;cwmw&lt;m

ZOIHsnsHHw

mHHmmHmbnm

ZOIHSQsHHwHsnzwnw.

t

.S

.3

wawmnmuom

mcvaon&lt;cwmw&lt;m

.

bHHonmbom
mzvooudcwmw&lt;m

.rw

.mw

.5

oosdswquou

Hangwaq

*

I

.E

.3

uwmwmwmbow
mcvoob&lt;¢wmw&lt;m

zongnsqu

aoadcwmwdm.

�.13..
TABLE V

Relation Between Degree of EEG-Delta Activity and
Number of Confabulation Errors

Mean

Degree of Delta Activity
High
Mean Number

Confabulation
Errors

)
)
)

Inquiry
No

Inquiry

.81

(N.=9)

.10 (N=21)

Mederete-Low

Difference

.19 (Halo)

.62

.07 (N=b)

.03

Significance
p

4 .05
N.S.

�Discussion:

elicited

Displacement, confabulation and extinction errors are
sequences of multiple and single

tactile stimuli are applied to

tests with touch stimulation, these errors are

In clinical

when

body

parts.

most prominent

in patients with cerebral disease (10). Theories Which have been advanced
to account for the occurrence of such errors have therefore emphasized
endogenous

factors involving the central nervous system.

That

the fre-

quency and type of response to a perceptual task may be markedly altered
by the immediate aspects of a

situation is indicated

by the numerous

studies of the role of set in perception (11). In this study the stimulus
situation has been varied to bring about differing conditions of mental set.

factors have not been neglected, and the relation
between the effects of different degrees of brain dysfunction has also been
However, the endogenous

determined.
In the course of convulsive therapy a marked increase in the number
of confabulation errors is brought about by the examiner's query of "anywhere
else?" following each stimulation. of the convulsive patients

who were asked

the question, confabulations were elicited primarily inthe group with high
degrees of

EEG

81

w

wave

activity

(marked

cerebral dysfunction)

and not

in

the group with low and moderate degrees (minimal cerebral dysfunction).
The importance

of the inquiry

is thus

enphasized by the consideration that

activity, there was little tendency for
confabulation errors to occur in convulsive patients when no inquiry was
regardless of changes in

EEG

10. Fink, Green and Bender, op.
11. Leeper, op.
M. Pollack,

cit., -

cit. ,

146-58.

.
.S. Battersby and M.B.Bender, Tachistoscopic
identification of contours in patients with brain damage,
J. Comp. Physiol. Bszghol. g9, 1957, 220-227.

made.

�.15Thus both

inquiry

and high degrees of EEG

delta activity provided the

milieu faVOrable to evoking confabulatory errors.

patients present a different picture. Although, virtually
delta activity is induced by subconvulsive therapy, the number of
Subconvulsive

no

confabulation errors of four of the nine subconvulsive patients queried
increased substantially during the treatment. Furthermore, While the
confabulation errors of these subconvulsive patients persisted and even
increased following the course of ﬂierapy, those of the convulsive patients
queried, in contrast, decreased to the pretreatment level. Patterns of
reversible decrement manifested by convulsive patients has been reported

WW

studies of the effects of electroShock

in the

of mental functioning (12). However,

it was

on

different types

expected that confabulations

elicited in subconvulsive patients at any interval, in.view
of earlier observations that cerebral dysfunction is not induced in these

would

not

be

patients (13).
An

explanation for the differences between the convulsive and

convulsive inquiry patients

is that their therapies

had differing

sub—

effects-

the practice factor. In convulsive patients, treatment diminished the
practice effect in all subjects, including those both with low and high
on

degrees of slow wave activity. Fbr each test interval, it was as if the
12. H.Korin, M. Fink and S. Kwalwasser, Relation of changes

in

memory and

learning to

ercts

improvement

in electroshock,

lg, 1956, 88-96; M. Fink, R.L. Kahn andon
of diffuse altered brain function
of Psychol. Proceed., 1958, 238-239.
EE’Conf.
perception,
Conf. Neural.

13.

Fink, R.L. Kahn and M.A. Green, Experimental Studies
of the electroshock process, Dis. Nerv. 528. 12, 1958,

M.

113-118.

�-16convulsive patients were starting anew.

patients with high

EEG

Under these conditions only

delta activity manifested a confabulatory set

within a single test period. After the course of therapy, with the
disappearance of the delta activity, convulsive patients were performing

at the pretreatment level. In the subconvulsive patients, the set
established in the pretreatment interval

test period during treatment.
more confebulatory
The
may make

Such

was re-enforced during each

Thus the subconvulsive

patients

made even

errors post-treatment.

results for the subconvulsive

group

indicate that certain patients

confabulation errors without an alteration of brain function.

patients are apparently influenced

as being suggestible or acquiescent.

by the examiner and may be described

The

failure of the convulsive patients

.to establish a set which persisted for prolonged intervals of time as did
the subconvulsive patients suggests a basis for the therapeutic effect
derived from convulsive therapy.

‘If the symptoms of the

patient are

interpretation is particularly
appropriate. From the point of view of concepts of mental set, the effect
of induced convulsions is to bring about a disruption of maladaptive patterns
regarded as a pathologic mental

set,

such an

of behavior.
The number

of displacement errors remained the

whether an inquiry was made.

than confabulations.

same

regardless of

errors occurred

much

During treatment approximately

30%

patients of both the inquiry

These

less frequently
of the convulsive

and no-inquiry groups responded with

one diaplacement. This finding compares

at least

closely with the results of

33%

with displacements obtained in a study of a similar population of electroshock patients in which touch stimuli were applied by the
1h.

M.

Fink, unpublished data.

clinical

method (1h)

�Displacement errors are not a prominent type of error

in an electroShock

pepulation.
With regard to the

extinction error, differences

were not

significant

between inquiry and no-inquiry groups. The high number of extinction errors

pretreatment and the subsequent decrease in errors during treatment, in this
study,

is in contrast

If clinical-tactile

to the results obtained with clinical

tactile techniques.

extinction errors are elicited
increase in error during treatment. The

methods are used, few

is a marked
results obtained in this Study are probably related to the initial difficulty
experienced by the patient in perceiving electrical stimuli at threshold
pretreatment and there

the rapid adaptation to the technique in further testing.
play a greater role than the changes induced by the treatment.
and

In

that a

initial studies
Bore

with threShold electrical stimuli,

it

These

factors

was believed

sensitive test of changes in brain function than the clinical-

for clinical purposes the
perceptual patterns obtained with electrical stimulation lack sufficient

tactile

method (15) could be devised.

however,

discriminability as indices of brain dysfunction. In part, the deficiences
of the method may be ascribed to the necessity for using fixed electrodes
and limitations in switching arrangements at threshold. For clinical
.

testing, therefore, simultaneous tactile stimuli applied rapidly in varied
sequence remains the best index= of altered brain function (16).
15.

Fink, Green.and Bender, gghgit,, h6-58

16.

M.

Green and M. Fink, Standardization of the face-hand

test,

Neurology,

h

l95h, 211-217.

�-18..
Summary:

tactile

This study of the perception of simultaneously applied

stimuli

was undertaken to determine the

relation

between the frequency

of perceptual errors to the inquiry made by the examiner.

The

relation

between inquiry, perceptual response and the degree of brain dysfunction
was

also considered.
In the test procedure, the threshold (100 per cent point) for square

wave

electrical stimuli, applied to the

patients

was applied
and

in a

mixed order

to both cheeks

trials
made

determined. Sequences of

was

two simultaneous and

for the hand

(homologous

were alternated

hand and cheek of 61

psychiatric
single stimuli

and cheek (heterogenous stimulation)

stimulation) Heterologous and

for each patient. For

one group, an

homologous

inquiry was

following each reSponse to a stimulation, while in a second group,

Patients were treated either-by convulsive or subconvulsive courses of therapy, at three times per-week for 12-20 applications.

no inquiry was made.

There

errors

significant relationdhip between the frequency of confabulation
the inquiry ("suggestion-induced set") in both convulsive and

Was

and

subconVulsive

a

patients.v However, the confabulatory tendencies of these

patients differed. Although the errors for both increased during treatment,
errors decreased post-treatment for the convulsive group, but in the
subconvulsive group errors increased

inquiry
errors

further.

differences

between

and no-inquiry groups with regard to

were

extinction or displacement
insignificant. £:;.convulsive-inquiry patients, the confabulatory

errors of patients with high degrees of
more frequent than those of
wave

The

activity.

slow-wave

patients with a

low

activity

were

significantly

or moderate degrees of slow

�.19-

Conclusions:

tests with simultaneous electrical tactile stimuli the number
of Confabulatory errors is related to an induced set suggested uy the
In

examiner' s inquiry.
The number

of confabulatory errors is increased in patients with

brain dysfunction in relation to

an

inquiry, but

may

also

in patientS'without brain dysfunction.who are acquiescent

be induced
and

susceptible

to suggestion.
The

frequency of displacement or extinction errors

to the inquiry procedure.

is not related

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2714">
                <text>The Role of set in the perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli. Amer J Psychol. 72:384-392.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2715">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2716">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-40-006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2717">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2718">
                <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2719">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2720">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2721">
                <text>[Preprint] and offprint. OFFPRINT FROM THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2722">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2723">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74474">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81035">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87596">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94157">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="288" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="79">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f9143989b4f022343ed9672f34b2d359.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1500dfbcc8282737a3c8c3677182eaf9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100705">
                    <text>WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUATION
1
OF IMIPBAMINE THERAPY
JOHN C. KRAMER, M.D.,2 DONALD F. KLEIN, M.D.,3
AND MAX FINK, M.D.‘

[Reprinted from THE

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY,

V0]. 118, No. 6, December, 1961]

�,

.

0

i

~
I

I‘NG- DISCONTIN'UATION

OFIMIPRAMINE THERAPY

1

.

V

IOHN

_'.-KHAMEH,
M.D;,2
c:

DONALD “E KLE‘I‘NQMD.)

mMAXFIN‘K, Mgn.4
r

v

I

'

�1961

1

CLINICAL NOTES

549

WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUATION
1
OF IMIPRAMINE THERAPY
JOHN C. KRAMER, M.D.,2 DONALD F. KLEIN, M.D.,3
AND MAX FINK, M.D.4

On discontinuation of imipramine 5 treatment some psychiatric patients reported
nausea, vomiting, dizziness, coryza, muscuAided, in part, by grant MY—2715 of National
Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of
Health, USPHS.
2 Post Doctoral Research Fellow, USPHS, 19601

1961.

Mental Health Career Investigator, USPHS.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L. I., N. Y.
5 The cooperation and assistance of Ceigy
Pharmaceuticals is gratefully acknowledged.
3
4

lar pains and malaise. The symptoms were
ﬁrst regarded as conversion phenomena, but
after several repetitions were considered
due to physiological withdrawal.
Of the patients treated with imipramine
45 had been observed within the hospital
during withdrawal of medication. Treatment was instituted with oral doses of 75
mg. daily and usually increased each week
in 75 mg. steps. The daily maintenance dose
was 300 mg./day in 34 patients, more than
300 mg./day in 3 patients, and less than

�550

CLINICAL NOTES

300 mg./day in 8 patients.

We reviewed our interview records and
the daily nursing notes, noting reports of
withdrawal symptoms within 48 hours of
cessation of medication in 25 of the 45 patients. Most prominent were nausea with or
without vomiting—16 subjects, headache—
10, giddiness—lO, coryza—8, chills—6, weakness and fatigue—5, and musculoskeletal
pain—4.
Twenty—two of 26 patients treated for 2

months or longer reported withdrawal
symptoms, while only 3 of 19 patients
treated less than 2 months reported similar
symptoms (p&lt; .001).
The 25 patients who had been treated
for more than 2 months were rated for
severity of symptomatology. The reaction
was scored as “marked” if subjects reported
more than 2 different symptoms with signiﬁcant distress and as “minimal” if they
reported fewer than 2 symptoms causing
minor distress, or no symptoms. Of 13 patients with a medication tapering and termination period of less than 2 weeks, 8 had
marked withdrawal symptoms and 5 mini—
mal. Of 12 with a medication termination
period longer than 2 weeks, only 2 subjects
demonstrated marked withdrawal symptoms

(p:.05).

These results are in keeping with the
general experience that the intensity of
physiological withdrawal symptoms is directly proportional to the duration of drug
administration and the abruptness of withdrawal. We could not relate the withdrawal
syndrome to the size of the maintenance
dose, since our range was too small. However, our modal schedule of 300 mg. per day
is larger than the usual clinical schedule of
100 to 150 mg. per day and may account
for the inconspicuousness of this phenomenon in other studies.
We observed that allowing a period of
2-4 weeks for withdrawal was prophylactically effective. When symptoms on imipramine discontinuation occurred they
could readily be treated by resuming imipramine at 50 mg. daily and gradually decreasing over a 1-week period.

[

December

DISCUSSION

A physiological withdrawal syndrome
following the termination of treatment with

opiates, demerol, barbiturates, glutethimide,
alcohol, chlorpromazine and meprobamate
is well known. Recently withdrawal symptoms with methaminodiazepoxide(2), nialamide(1) and alpha-ethyltryptamine(5)
have been reported. Kuhn( 3) and Mann
and Macpherson(4) have also reported
symptoms on abrupt imipramine withdrawa1.

Until recently the physiological withdrawal syndrome was considered restricted
to CNS “depressants” such as opiates, barbiturates and alcohol. This was conﬁrmed
by the absence of such a syndrome with
“stimulant” drugs such as cocaine, d-amphetamine, marijuana, mescaline and LSD. The
occurrence of such a syndrome with imipramine, nialamide, and alpha-ethyltryptamine is of considerable interest, therefore,
since these drugs have been loosely referred
to as “psychic energizers” with energetic
effects similar to “stimulant” drugs. It is
apparent that a simple depression—stimulation dimension is inadequate to describe the
complexity of drug effect both physiologically and behaviorally.
The withdrawal syndrome complicates
the evaluation of patients after drug discontinuation since both patients and physicians often interpret the onset of symptoms
as an upsurge of “anxiety” related to incipient relapse, and resume treatment with
the gratifying subsidence of the “anxiety.”
This may cause both patients and physicians
to overvalue the importance of the medication to the patient’s stability.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Hollister, L. E., Motzenbecker, F. P., and
Prusmack, J. J. : J. Clin. Exp. Psychopath., 21 :
212, 1960.
2. Hollister, L. E., Motzenbecker, F. P., and
Degan, R. 0.: Psychopharmacologia, 2: 63,
1961.
3. Kuhn, R: Schweizerische Medizinische
Wochenschrift, 87: 1135, 1957.
4. Mann, A., and Macpherson, A. : Canad.
Psychiat. Assoc. J., 4: 38, 1959.
5. Turner, W. I., and Merlis, S. : J. Neuropsychiat., 2 : 1961.

��Htth¢r¢wnl Symptonu ralluvtnz

Discontinuation at In1pran1uo fhurtpy

{can 6.

{rt-st,

H.D.#, nonald
and

r.

Kissn, x.n.u‘

In: link, 3.9.

from tho Departnont of Exporincntal rayohigtry,
3:110:40 lalpltal, Olen 00kt, 5.1., [.1.

ﬂoatorll Raconrch fallow, 88,38, 1960~1961.
oqnontnl lunlth euro-r Iavuatagutor, ssrus.
Aided, in part, by grant l1~2715 or Intionul Institute
01 Hantnl Health, Int1¢n¢1 Iu|t1tutoa at laulth, yarns.
the caoportttou and aauiutanoo ot_6.1¢y Pharancauttcal:

O

P98?

52.301111: nekuuvlcdaod.
VI: 6/29/61
13

�discontinuation of iliprsniss trsstnsnt sons
pstissts, ands: obssrvssisa ts: s vsristy a: psychistric
sysdrssss, rsportsd nsssss, vssiting, dissinsss, ssryss,
ssscslsr psins sad Islsiss. Ens sysptsss ssrs first
rsgsrdsd ss osmvsrsisa phsnousns, but stisr ssvsrsl
rspstitisns vs sonsidsrsd thsss to be dss to physiological withdrsssl sad an sttolpt vss nsds to dotsrsins
their trsqusaoy sad varisty.
o: the pstisats trsstsd with isiprssins during sn
sightoon nsnth psriod, forty-11's hsd bssn observed
within the hospitsl sstting during withdrawal of ssdissties. In thsss subsects trsstnsnt was instituted with
arsi dosss st 75 s; dsiiy sad ssnsliy issrssssd sssh
sssk in 75 as stsps. Ins dsiiy‘ssistsnsaes dsss ass
zoo aglsay in thirty-tour puss-ntsg loss than 300 ltldly
in tires pstisass; and loss thin 300 Is/dsy in sight
0n

pstisats.
rsvisssd our intsrviss rssords and ﬁts dsily
ssrsiac notss, noting rspsrss o: uithdrsssl symptoms
within k8 hours of ssssstisa or sodiostion in 25 of
tho h! pstisnts. (rsbls I)
Vs

n“.-.IABLE

I

-D.-”-

�2.510

I

aynptonl Within an Intro 01 cunna$1on or Iniprnnino therapy’

Pnttontl conning theft?!
Patients reporting Iynptonu

hS

25

azggtons

l:unou (and/or vomiting)

16

Houdnoho

10

GiddinOII

.

10

Darya:

chill:
taintnuuu
HIIoqu-Ikolotsl pain
Hoaknosu or

rmma

�.29

ovidoat

whoa
tho aurorolottonohip
otguitioont
ttoo o: trootlont and tho oppooroaoo of orlptono oro oomporod. (Toblo I!) toasty-too of tvonty-otx patients
trootod for two ooutho or longor roportod withdruvol
oyuptono, whilo only throo of ntnotoon potionto trootod
loo: than too nontho roportod otnilor oynptono.

1o

A

II
O
.‘O--..

fAILB

to dotornino tho rolotion of tho obouptaooo ot
nodiootton withdrovol to indoood oyuptouo, tho twentyrtvovpottonto who bod boon trootod for noro thou two
ooutho ooro rotod to: oovortty o: oynptoootoloay. rho
rooottoo woo ooorod oo 'norkod' 1: lobaooto roportod
ooro thou two dittoroot oynptono with otgaitioont diotrooo and to "minimal“ at tho: roportod towor than two
oyoptono oonoins lino: atotrooo, or no symptolo. Too
groupo ooro doriaod according to otothor tho poriod or
Iod1oot1on rodootton woo looo thou too rook: or too uooko
t or longoo. (foblo III)

“-Qﬂ‘..-.
TABLS

III

�Ink}: 1!
nurution of Iniprnltno Therapy
w1%hdr¢vn1
Symptoms

It

Withdrawal
Symptonu

(lubaootl)

(subjects)

in. isn‘t.

I

16

fun South: or hangar

22

h

Lon. thin

x9 .- 23.91.
P &lt;

.001

2gblo £51

rurtod or 3:3: Gestation In Patients
rruatcd st Lcnlt fro abnthn
Withdrawal 8232t¢nl

lurked

.

Lon. than rug

minimal

VIDEO

6

5

fun with: or Long.»

a

10

p ~ .05

(Fisher) (h)

�~3-

!haaa raaalta art in kaaping vita ﬁha can-val
asparianaa ihat tho iataaaity a: phyaiolocical
withdrawal aylptoua is directly proportional in tho
duration at drug adaiaiatration and tha abruptaaaa
at viﬁhdraaal. Va scald not ralata tha appaaranaa of
at: withdrawal ayndroao to tho aiaa o: tho aaiatauanea
doaa, ainoa our ranaa uaa too shall. ﬂovavar. our
natal aahadala a! 300 I; ha: day in largo: than tho
aaaal clinical aahadala a: 100 ta 150 a. par day and
nay account for an. inaauapioaaaaaaaa a: thin
phaaaaaaaa in Qatar atadiaa. It Iaat ha aataa that
withdrawal aylpiaaa was. unvaried by aaa patiaat aha

III traataa la: tua lantha at
75 In; par «7.

a marina. daaa

at

abaarvad that alluviag a parted at 3-h wacktar withdrawal ran prayhylaatiaally attaetiva. ihan
ayaptaaa an iaipraaiaa diaeoatinaatiaa acaurrad they
coal! readily be treated by raaaaing iaipraaiaa at
Ha

,

56

a; daily aid gradually aaaraaains era: a

parted.

one tack

�9h. accurrcauc a: a vhf-1010:1931 utthdrnnal
lyndronc tollcrtlg the tor-tnutton o: troninoat with
optntcl, duu.rol, burhtiurltcn. all$othilado and 1100301
1! wall kntln¢ looantly withdrlvul Irlgten- attachlsrptonnsaao (2), Isthnatnodinuapcxtlo {1). nialnuldo
(5}, alpha-oihyittyp‘anlno (9) and nuptniiluto (1,3,6)
lav. icon rcporﬁod. tan: (8) ha; ciao obstrvod lyuyton‘
on abrupt znlprnltno withdraanlo
Until riotatly it. phytiologteal iithdruu:1
cyadrono was coalidtroi routrtetcd to 618 'dcpréunsatn'
Inch OI splat... barblﬁurnsos and alcohol. this was
contirnod 57 Sh. tbacnco of such a cyndruno with
“stannlsnt‘ drugs tank .3 cocgtno, d-tlphotanino,
unhealino
and £39. In. accurronoc at such
antisulan,
a syndrcnn with tulprlltnu,43131anldn, and alpha.ihrltryptaazno 1- or etalldnrahll Satori-t, ‘horutorc.
can-o thus. drug: havn baa: 1.90.17 rtrorrcd to a:
'payuhao 0303:1302.“ 11$) unaruo‘tc o£1¢ctn 01-11::
'

human

an

to
u .1»:am... It 1.- .pnmt
Canto-liaa-stxlnlatioa dincnulun 1: tnnlcquat. to
donoribu tho.¢olploxtty or drug effect hath phyuso«
logically and behaviorully.

in.

at

withdrawal 9:362:30 conpl1oatbn tho avnlunttou
pcttcutn utter drug dicooutsnuatton, both oltniually

.

�hoth
and
patina“
an”
maximum,
punch:um 1“.»er tn ant a mu», (mans, to.
u a: spur" a: ‘uuaotyﬂ "1am to menu“ "up“.
and hum a mum ”amt an m ”any“.
«bum» a: a. 'mtoty'. m. any at!" ”a
and
plantain: to ova-van tho moral» of a.
plum“
noun“... to tho grunt“ gummy.
and

�m

1. no

taunts-u at «1pm»

”um“

product. phyutoIocto-l withdruwnl uynptonu, which
arc rolutod to luasth of ‘rontnaut and abruptuocn o:
withdrivui. aylptonn may also be rolntad to douaco
luv-1o

I.

H1thdrar¢1 lyyptons any h. militia-d qr
oltntuutod by running ﬁtchuaquol.
I

it.

aneurraaac of : withdranul syndrong
lath tnlprgnluo to porttnoaﬁ ta tn. coucoptunltus$1.: or its paynhowhnrnaaolocical notiviﬂr, and to

3.

prabltna

I: clinical

Isaac-hunt.

�1.

mu,

3.1., at.

an... Ida

W.

’-

33.3,.

1.

1023, 1955.

Inch.
3-.»

9.3.:

Mac, 3.3.

and

833. 1958.

lulu,

1.3.:

m:

a,

J,

931. 1959.

'mnﬁ:

MI

801301,
id.
8..
vgumMe
autumn,
m
ncﬁrtI-ltll, It! tort, 1956, 96.
5. lanai", In!” ”summer”, hr. and Pam-suck, 3.3.:
3 lmhﬂnﬁh, 3;: 212, 1960.
g, nun: L“
6- lolltltor, L.R. and ﬂlcsanar, !.8.s £3!3§22§£££££2¥3‘§2&amp;
196°.
3”,
;.
7. amour, In!” Runabout», LP. and Baa, the”

It.

”that, BA”

in

W
a

W.

I. ma. M

2-

‘3: 1951.

1135, 1957.

9.

Mar,

m1.

ad

lit-r110,

373, 1961 (app)... 1)

8.1 J,

Inn-3mg;

. g:

9.1:

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2874">
                <text>Withdrawal symptoms following discontinuation of Imipramine therapy. Amer J Psychiat, 118:549-50.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2875">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2876">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-56-022</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2877">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2878">
                <text>Kramer, John C.; Klein, Donald F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2879">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2880">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2881">
                <text>Reprint (Clinical notes) and [preprint]. Reprint from THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, V0L. 118, No. 6, December, 1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2882">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2883">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74490">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81051">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87612">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94173">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
