<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=66&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CCreator" accessDate="2026-10-03T03:27:13+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>66</pageNumber>
      <perPage>100</perPage>
      <totalResults>6561</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="250" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="41">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/4829a346731c642d4b009d69ede20ef4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f52f80e5b4fabf3b53f885310a3d6354</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100667">
                    <text>Clinical and electroencephalographic
effects of Megimide in patients
Without cerebral disease
Martin A. Green, M.D., and Max Fink, M.D.
the introduction of Megimide (beta, beta methylethylglutarimide) as an antagonist for barbiturate intoxication in 1955, considerable interest has been stimulated in its
clinical applicability. Initial reports noted its
efﬁcacy in barbiturate poisoning,1—4 but subsequent studies failed to substantiate this applicationf)"8 In this laboratory, barbiturates
are frequently administered under the standardized conditions of the “amobarbital test.”9
It was thus possible to assess the efficacy of
Megimide in altering the behavioral response
of human subjects to physiologic equivalent
amounts of barbiturate.
In addition to its suggested antagonism to
barbiturate, Megimide induces both paroxys—
mal discharges in the electroencephalogram
and clinical grand mal seizures.10—14 The present report concerns our experience with both
the behavioral and electroencephalographic effects of Megimide.
FOLLOWIXG

AIATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-four hospitalized voluntary psychiatric patients with psychoneurosis, depression,
or schizophrenia, ranging in age from 27 to
64 years, were studied. Megimide in a concentration of 5 mg. per cc. was administered
intravenously at the rate of 0.5 mg. per kg.
per minute, until deﬁnite changes were observed in the electroencephalogram and often
beyond this point. The amount of Megimide
varied from 45 mg. to 250 mg.
In 15 subjects Megimide was administered
without prior amobarbital. In 19 patients it
was given following the administration of in—
travenous amobarbital which was injected at
0.5 mg. per kg. every 40 seconds, in amounts
necessary to induce nystagmus, slurred speech,
and marked drowsiness or sleep.

All experiments were undertaken in the elec-

troencephalographic laboratory. An electroencephalogram was made prior to the injections
and was run continuously during the administration of both drugs. The electrode placement consisted of frontal, motor—parietal, occipital, anterior temporal, posterior temporal,
vertex, and earlobe'. Both scalp—to-earlobe and
scalp-to-scalp combinations were used.
RESULTS

The electroencephalogram in all subjects
prior to the administration of the drugs was
“normal,” that is, symmetric and non-dysrhythmic.
Electroencephalographic Response
In the amount and rate of injection of
Megimide employed, electroencephalographic
changes occurred in every patient. The type
of response and the amount of drug necessary
to induce such a response were highly variable.
The electroencephalographic changes included
irregular low- and moderate-voltage slow ac—
tivity, bursts of slow activity (usually of high
voltage), single spike discharges, and spikewave forms (ﬁgure 1 A, B, and C). These ef—
fects were diffuse and symmetric, with greatest prominence in the temporal leads.
The sequence of these responses was inconstant. Irregular, low-voltage slow activity
was the most frequent initial change in the
record. In other instances, bursts of highvoltage slow activity or spike activity appeared
initially. As the injection continued, the amplitude and per cent time delta activity inFrom the department of experimental psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New York.
Read at the meeting of the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, New York, December 1956.
Aided by Grant M 927, National Institute of Mental
Health, National Institutes of Health, US. Public Health
Service.

Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, September 1958, Vol. 8, N0. 9
Copyright 1958, by Lancet Publications, Inc.

�EFFECTS OF MEGIMIDE
"NV‘VV

Mvw

LP-RP

*V‘JlWMAA/‘fr'rwm“MWHWIMS‘WWVWWMmeLMMA.
L0‘

R

0

(memwwmewwWWW»

WM

WﬂM‘j(Ml/\rlY/‘Vr'j‘ﬂuj'wwMWWWWWWJWMW VWLWMW

WWW/wWWJMWW *WWWWWWW

AT R P T
I‘
5A
,
”v
w.
a
WW1
'«M
“-34x4“ MW‘WMMWW
I ‘A ‘M’m‘rv‘v‘rﬁ‘w Jam.M’w’M—‘ﬁ' draw;
R

“ij

MW
®

.I

50

35cc

MEGIMIDE (5

cc/

MIN)

mv

lSEC,

LP-RP

@

30 cc MEGIMIDE (Soc/MIN.)

'

SEC'

creased. Bursts of high—voltage slow activity
were seen eventually in almost all patients.
Spike discharges, however, were less frequent,
even with relatively large doses of Megimide.
For example, the tracings in one subject after
receiving 220 mg. of Megimide and in another
after receiving 250 mg. showed irregular diffuse slow activity without spike activity.
Seizures
Because of the nature of the population and
the goals of our study, we specifically avoided
administering Megimide in rates and amounts
that would produce clinical grand mal seizures.
Despite these precautions, a grand mal seizure
was inadvertently induced in one patient. A
33 year old woman was given 200 mg. of
Megimide at the rate of 50 mg. per minute.
Up to 150 mg. there was only a decrease in
the voltage of the alpha activity. After 200
mg. there was a sudden long run of diffuse,
rhythmic 4 to 5% cycles per second high voltage activity, with intermixed spike activity
which was immediately followed by the seizure. The electroencephalogram during injection and prior to the seizure showed minimal
changes, and the seizure was not anticipated

35M: MEGIMIDE

(Sac/MIN.)

SE“

F IG. 1. Different types of electroencephalographic response to Megimide. A, delta activity, irregularly and
in bursts, B, single spike activity, C, spike-wave activity

Subjective Response
The subjective reaction to Megimide was
minimal, even when the induced changes in
the electroencephalogram were severe. A few
subjects complained of nausea, “dizziness,”
“shakiness,” or a peculiar sensation in the abdomen. It was possible, however, to continue
the injection without further increase in the
symptoms. Two subjects became apprehensive,
and in one of these the injection had to be
discontinued.
Myoclonic jerks occurred frequently. They
were usually mild and conﬁned to one extremity. Less frequently they were bilateral
and more severe. The relationship between
these movements and spike activity was inconstant. The myoclonic jerks usually preceded
the appearance of spike activity, althOugh the
reverse occurred occasionally. The simultaneous appearance of spike activity with myoclonic jerks was infrequent.
The effect of Megimide was short-lived.
There were no instances of seizures or other
abnormal responses later in the day following
its administration. However, since intravenous
amobarbital followed in all patients, this may
have prevented such occurrences.
The clinical and electroencephalographic responses to intravenous amobarbital following
Megimide appeared similar to those seen in
subjects in whom amobarbital is administered
without prior medication. The slow-wave or
spike activity induced by Megimide disappeared and the usual patterns associated with
barbiturates developed (ﬁgure 2). However,

�NE UROLOGY

684

the well-modulated high per cent time beta
activity usually noted after barbiturate administered was less prominent.
M egz’mide Following Amobarbital
One group of subjects received intravenous
amobarbital prior to Megimide until drowsiness, slurred speech, and nystagmus were induced. The electroencephalogram showed the
patterns commonly associated with barbiturates, that is, an increase in voltage and per
cent time fast activity and a decrease in
amount and voltage of alpha activity. The most
prominent clinical change was the awakening
of the subject. Within the few minutes necessary for the injection, the patient became more
responsive, slurred speech disappeared, and
drowsiness, both on subjective and objective
evaluation, was minimal or absent. Nystagmus became inconstant, unsustained, or disappeared completely. Gait, including heel-totoe walking, was steady. However, the awakening effect was not uniform for all aspects
of behavior altered by barbiturate. For ex—
ample, if the subject became euphoric and
more talkative with barbiturate, such behavior
may have persisted in a milder form, even
after the drowsiness of amobarbital was abolished by Megimide.
These clinical changes were accompanied by
alterations in the electroencephalogram (figure 3). Patterns of drowsy activity disappeared. Alpha activity increased both in
amount and voltage. Fast activity induced by
amobarbital usually persisted unchanged or
was reduced only sightly. In some instances
it increased in amount and voltage. The prior
administration of amobarbital did not prevent
the appearance of paroxysmal discharges.

WW W

LP-RP

W
WJMWW
LO'RO

LF-RF

-om

A

mmwwwwwwvwvv

WWW/”WWW

AT-PT

@RESTING

RECORD

W

wa~VMMMWh~WMphﬁwnw~
L

AT-F

R

MMKWWWMMVWVJ

@

UL

‘vr—WW‘W

wabwuvmh1-vun~pa~h4qu

WWW»
50!”?—
1

azsrmc

RECORD

252

(28

mg. AIOBARBIYAL

rug/40

SEC.)

40 c: IEGEIIDE
(5 cc / III.)

FIG. 2. Effect of amobarbital following administration

of Megimide

ﬁWWA/VWW
38cm MEGIMIDEHScc/MIN.)

r.

W

WWW
WWWWHW
WWW
WWW

WVNMWMWWM
o

LO . R0

F:

MNVWVWVWVW—M’NW’

Megimide is similar to pentalenetetrazol
(Metrazol) in that it induces delta activity,
spike and spike-wave activity in the electro—
encephalogram, and clinical grand mal seizures. Such changes occur in nonepileptic subjects without brain disease, and considerable
individual variability in the threshold for these
changes exists. These discharges are nonspecific and cannot be used as evidence of
the presence of a seizure disorder.
The possibility of using Megimide in activating the electroencephalogram has received
study.10—1‘-’ Several investigators have noted a
more gradual onset of the electroencephalographic and clinical changes with Megimide
than with Metrazol. For this reason, the opinion is expressed that Megimide may be more
facile in reproducing both clinical and electro—
encephalographic seizures in patients with
seizure disorders. It should be emphasized,
however, that in the one patient in the present
study in whom a grand mal seizure occurred,
the seizure began suddenly and was not anticipated either from the electroencephalogram
or previous clinical responses.
Megimide is effective in counteracting the
clinical effects of small doses of intravenous
amobarbital. This property has been previously
demonstrated in animals3 and is being utilized

LF-RF

k

WN-WINW‘MWMNWVM

DISCUSSION

0%va6Wwaw'wwrwwqp'v

LM-RM

{-0

Bursts of high-voltage slow activity, spike activity, or spike-wave activity often appeared,
usually during or after awakening. Such activity was not a necessary accompaniment of
the awakening response, however, since other
subjects in whom clinical drowsiness disappeared did not show such discharges.

500 mg.AMOBARBlTAL
(50 mq./40 SEC.)

Effect of Megimide following administration
of amobarbital
FIG. 3.

SEC.

�EFFECTS OF MEGIMIDE
in anesthesiology to shorten the recovery period from barbiturate anesthesia postoperatively.15 It is questionable whether this action
is speciﬁc for barbiturates or whether it also
applies to states of altered consciousness due
to other agents as well.16
CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-four psychiatric patients without
cerebral disease were given Megimide (beta,
beta-methylethylglutarimide) before and after
the administration of intravenous amobarbital.
2. Megimide produces irregular delta activ~
ity, bursts of delta activity, and spike and
spike-wave activity in the electroencephalo1.

685

gram. Such effects are similar to those produced by pentalenetetrazol (Metrazol).
3. Considerable individual variability exists
in the amount of drug necessary to produce
these changes.
4. A grand mal seizure was inadvertently
induced in one patient. The electroencephalogram during the injection and prior to the seizure showed minimal changes and the seizure
was not anticipated.
5. Megimide counteracts the clinical and
some of the electroencephalographic effects of
small doses of intravenous amobarbital.
Megimide supplied through the courtesy of A.
las Ltd., Slough, Bucks, England.

&amp;

I. Nicho-

REFERENCES
A., SHAW, F. H., CASS, N. M., and
\Van, H. M.:M. A new treatment of barbiturate intoxication. Brit.
J. 1:1238, 1955.

1. SCHULMAN,

to .

3.

4.
5.
6.
1.

8.
9.

F. H.: Further experiences with Megimide—a
barbiturate antagonist. M. J. Australia 2:889, 1955.
SHAW, F. H., SIMON, S. E., CAss, N., and SCHULMAN,
.-\.: Barbiturate antagonism. Nature 174:402, 1954.
HARRIS, T. A. 13.: A barbiturate antagonist. Lancet
1:268, 1955.
L()U\V, A., and SONNE, L. M.: Megimide in the
treatment of barbituric acid poisoning. Lancet 2:961,
1956.
PEDERSEN, ].: Amusing effect of Megimide and Ami—
phenazole in allypropymal poisoning. Lancet 2:965,
1956.
PLUM, F., and SWANSON, A. G.: Barbiturate poisoning
treated by physiological methods. J.A.M.A. 163:827,
1957.
CERSHON, S., and SHAW, F. H.: Effects of Bemegridc
on barbiturate overdosage in humans. Brit. M. J. 2:
1509, 1957.
\VEINSTEIN, E. A., KAHN, R. L., SUGARMAN, L. A.,
and LINN, L.: The diagnostic use of amobarbital sodium (“Amytal sodium”) in brain disease. Am. J.
Psychiat. 109:889, 1953.
SHAW,

10. COURJON, 1., and BONNET, H.: Comparative effects of
Metrazol and Megimide in activation of epileptic pa-

tients. EEG

11.

12.

13.
14.

15.

Clin. Neurophysiol. 8:710, 1956.
DROSSOPOULO, G., GASTAUT, H., VERDEAUX, G. and J.,
and SCHULLER, E.: Comparison of EEG “activation”
by pentamethylenetetrazol (Metrazol) and Bemegride
(Megimide). EEG &amp; Clin. Neurophysiol. 8:710, 1956.
Room, E. A., RUTLEDGE, L. T., and CALHOUN, H. D.:
Megimide and Metrazol (A comparison of their convulsant action in man and in the cat). EEG &amp; Clin.
Neurophysiol. 10:208, 1958.
SOD‘TRBERG, U.: Eﬂect of Bemegride (Megimide) on
cerebral blood flow and electrical activity of brain.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 792239, 1958.
PEACOCK, J. M.: An electroencephalographic examina—
tion of the effects of Megimide and Daptazole in bar—
biturate narcosis. EEG 8: Clin. Neurophysiol. 8:289,
1956.
VVYKE, B. D., and FRAYVVORTH, E.: Use of Bemegride
in terminating barbiturate anesthesia. Lancet 2:1025,
&amp;

1.957.
16. BOTTINGER, L. E., ENGSTEDT, L., and STRANDBERG,
0.: Is Bemegride a speciﬁc barbiturate antagonist?

Lancet 1:932, 1957.

�6mm

and

m We“: at Was

in Patients WW?» 66”me Mum

W m
A.

11.3.

‘W-AMWI

&lt;

I

.

the
m Gala,
Wt30!.of mm mm. mm swam.
Glen

1mm...

matting at the Max “manhunt: or
m at thoMubor
Elsemmm.
1956.

Nam Yam-k,

"

Aiéadhy Grant

Wham

3/58

65f

I! 92?, Katina}. M‘W‘lﬁi at mm
Kalil), 0.3. ﬁbula Knuth 3031“.

mm. Ram

��4-:—

hospnmua
Wm
Mulmon

ma,
yam, um studied.

a:-

whammy

mum“! ranging in

We inat

an Watered inbmmaly
per

mama“ gamma with psycho0.39

tram 27 to

a maxim-inﬂux: o: 5 mg; put am,
the mm

at 9.5 mg. par

mm. until «ﬁnite 611mg” m ubsowad in tin
Ma mm. the amt»

beyond

am:
may

he wounds, in

spam,

We varied

Mm

viii and

aim

m. ta 290 mg.
lumen» Home» was magnum without mic: m»
In mum 1.4: as given immg New summation at
unhrbital which as inject“! at 0.5 as. per

rm
mum.
m

6k.

M“

from

1:5

mm

amt: Wavy ta induce mums,

and marked «112%:thme~ or

slurred

ﬁlm.

m momma mm mama in the ma Mathew.An memeephamm m 13m Mar to tho mmctiw and was

Wavim

cantmmly during tho
phmt mm mind 91‘ frontal,
run

Mama-cl,

memo:

at“

both ﬁxings. The

mam

WWam, manta}... mtariw

W31, vim ma earlobe inads.

mm: mm scalp ’w snip «mum awn aplayad.

Bail:

map ta

��.V

of gang.

Warmth

voliaga at iha alpha
lang mm

.

Up

a»

than“: only: deem” in'iha
After 206 as... than-a we a sum

“150%.,

activity.

at diffuse, rhyihﬁa

W am high value. wiivzliy with

mm m immialy 2mm
mm mm minty
injaaiian
print ta
Mam

'ma

EEG

during the

iha

am

itva

Ros

The

a

,

mm

same}

W!‘ and tho «ism-a was not mucmm.
Sub;

subjective mailer: to Magma

mm, man when the induaad ahangea in tho

EEG

were

mam.

by iha

m

am”.

A

mm, ”minnow,“ Was," er a.
manna! mum in tha nbdamm Xi m pauiblo, however, to
amtima iha inﬂation wiihaui further 1mm in the symptom.

few subjaaia combined

of

mhjeets boom appﬂhamiva, and in
be

arm

Two

at ilmsa the injaaiia‘n had m

ﬁsmniimad.

Winnie Jarka momma Imumily. ‘2'th were usually mild, and
matinee? ia ans mtmiiy. has tramway they were bilateral and
mam am. The “humans: batman than. awn-mania and spike nativity
39m usually panama iha appearance at?
m immimi. the

We

31mm «nativity, aliheuﬁz

imam mmmea at

iha

spike

maimauy
W
aciiﬂiy

oaaurrod. me

with maeloma

am

m m Mmmt.

affaci a: Hashim m mama-mm. There were no inatmaaa‘
at amsma or oihar abnormal lawman hint in the day ramming its
The

Waimiim. timer,

since mi «was mobarbiial

paiimia, this my have Want.“

main

in all

oaaumnaaa.

The 63.1mm md EEG rasponaaa in inimvanana

Mamas manna similar to

mum

ihm am in

mmmiial “liming

ant-210431;:

in

when

what-him

��tor

in mm

the

mung We, hm».

ma Wu dimming

did

£11130

mat. «that

«ﬁxer

swam,

am we mam”.

��1..

WWW pmwm patients ﬁtment «relate: We

were given

arm

Minds (mu, umwlamymunmm) Mum and

«hints tratim af “ﬁnances

2.

”We prudence irregular dame mtivity, bursts of delta

activity. we mike

and

emu Wﬁty in the elutrmoephelngm,

mm to WMWGI (kiwi) .

effects are
3. ﬂammable

Sum

agent.
.

The

WM.

the

meant-y to
h; A. grand

mum variability mm in the amt er

pram the"

We

'

u: «um um: inadvertently manage in m mum.
«rum

showed

mm

emanate the clinical, and was

of the

EEG

W «hang the manage; and Mar to the

alumna and the seizure

5. Magma:

as net 6.1119195.qu

of men. dawn of tutu-amp“ maba'rhim.

etfeete,

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2494">
                <text>Clinical and electroencephalographic effects of megimide in patients without cerebral disease. Neurology. 1958 Sep; 8(9):682-5.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2495">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2496">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-22b-027</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2497">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2498">
                <text>Green, Martin A.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2499">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2500">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2501">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, September 1958, Vol.8, N0.9</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2502">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2503">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74452">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81013">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87574">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94135">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="224" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="13">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/538bdc6ba0530077be0ac863533401f5.pdf</src>
        <authentication>74bce06bc6e20def0793fd89b0e7d725</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100641">
                    <text>3mm mam mum mm nwrxrmuox
arm:

ML.

WW4;

or

A

0A3:

MA
Mb.
(ﬁrm)

g;

(\Mmc

~39:qu

QNUULJ».6§~UJ\MA1 4%

(0.2.1:? #:g

Afod.

I751:

Viz/b.

wk.

316%
3.17/‘3.

�1.

sustained by patients during hospitalisations'
in mental institutions may cause disease of the nervous systemunrelated to the original illness. The trauma may be disregarded
and the resulting complications may be interpreted as further
progression of the original mental illness, thereby thwarting
possible definitive therapy. This is most apt to occur in
patients with organic psychoses. For this reason it is felt that
a report of a case of subdural heaatcna developing during
hospitalization in a patient with organic psychosis will be of
Head trauma

interest.

‘

fiftyoeight year old white feaale a nurse was
admitted to Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital because of aental and
personality changes. Four to five years previously the patient
began to aislay objects and complained of occasional headaches.
During the next two years it was noted that she would repeat
herself in conversation, did not play bridge as often as before
and complained of a constant feeling of fatigue. One and a half
adaission
to
a marked change in her behavior occurred.
years prior
She had difficulty in asking decisions, became caliess in her
dress, nislaid objects more frequently and exhibited stereotyped
HISTGRY:

A

aoveaents (rubbing hands together, crossing legs) when excited.
During the subsequent months she became ”confused" and incontinent.
Prior to her illness the patient was a nurse doing
private duty and was described as an excellent worker. She was.
a happy individual with a pleasant and sociable disposition and
had had zany friends. She had been an excellent bridge player,
winning aany prises.

�2.

pressure was 95/60, pulse 88, temperature 98,
respirations 18. General physical examination was negative.
The patient was well nourished and alert. neurological
examination disclosed her to be aphasic and apraetio. There
were disturbances in body scheme, a left hononyuous visual field
defect was present bu t the remaining cranial nerve functions
were intact. There was no ataxia or inooordination. hotor power
was noraal. The deep tendon reflexes were active and equal
bilaterally and the plantar responses were normal. There was a
left henisensory defect to pinpriek and touch.
gegggégggz; hunter puncture disclosed clear, colorless fluid under
an initial pressure of lho an. containing 5 lymphocytes and a
total protein of 62 ng.%. The Hassernann and colloidal gold
reactions were negative. X~rays of the skull and chest were
negative. in electroencephalogram was diffusely abnormal containing
a prevalence of slow activity maximal in the temporal and
posterior parietal regions bilaterally.
GOURSIa' The differential diagnosis was that of presenile
and
cerebral neoplasm. A
degenerative disease of the brain
pneuaoeneephalograa revealed generalised dilatation of the
ventricular system without displacement or distortion. The
cortical aarkings were increased bilaterally.
The patient was kept in the hospital for further study
of her mental and sensory defects. On at least one occasion
during this period bruises were noted overthe patient's head and
fees. these were thought to be sustained tron falls or from
busping into objects on the ward. The patient remained alert
and no new neurological signs developed. Approximately three
EIAIIIAEIOK: Blood

‘

'

�months after admission the patient gradually became lethargic
and exhibited rhythmic myoclonio movements, frequent in the

corner of the mouth and the left upper extremity and
occasional in the right upper extremity. A left hemiperosia developed
end the patient became etuporoue. Lumbar puncture diacloeed
clear, oolorleee fluid under an initial preeeure or 200 mm. and
containing 3 white blood cells. Loft temporal and right
A
hugh oubdurel henntoma
were
performed.
trephinationo
perietal
was found on the right eide. It contained dark red, liquid blood.
There we: no definite aotive bleeding. The outer membrane one
very thin and the inner nenbrene wee inoonepiououe. The right
hemisphere wee nerkedly compreeeed and failed to re-expend after
evacuation of the hlnmtona. 0n the left side there were two
eubdurel membranes about 3~5 mm. apart and oontaining a small
amount or yellowish fluid between then. There wee no blood. A
cerebral biopsy wee teken.fron the left parietal lobe by introducing
a glaee euotion tube for a distance of one inch at a right angle
to the eurteoe of the cortexand eepirating a specimen.
Following operation the patient became more alert but
the apheeie and the disturbance in body scheme were more marked

left

and epeeoh was

unintelligible.

The myoolonie movements

diaeppeered and the left henipareeie improved. Seventeen days
efter operation a pneunoencephelogran showed dilated lateral
ventricle: more marked on the left side. The enterior and
poeterior horns were aeynaetrioal and slightly diapleoed to the
left. The patient died eight days later. An autopsy was not
obtained.
hieroaeopio examination of the cerebral biopsy at the

�shoved numerous

senile plaques and
time or trephinstion
Alzheimer cells, oomputible with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's
diseaoe.
signs of progreooive diocese of the cerebral
hemisphere: which this patient developed during the latter part
of hospitalization were initially interpreted as the end stage
of an organic psychoaia. In view of the head traumn sustained
exclude
done
subdurel henntonn
ward
was
the
on
trephination
to
although this diagnosis was considered improbable. That the
subdurel'hanntonntn were of recent origin.end yore not present
before hospitalization is demonstrated by the following observations:
1) s pneuloenoophnlogrsn prior to the progression or neurological
ventriculnr
showed
system without
a symmetrically dilated
signs
'diaplaoinent or distortion and increased cortical markings
nontranen
the
of the hematonats were very thin.
2)
bilsterdlly;
Patients with organic ptyohosie in nentsl hospitals
are psrtioulerly prone to head trauma which may initiate subdursl
hemntamn; Progressive usurologioal signs in such patients should
be evaluated with this oonsiderstion in mind.
The

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2234">
                <text>Subdural hematoma developing during hospitalization. Arch. Neurol Psychiatry. 1951 Aug; 66(2): 230-1</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2235">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2236">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-1-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2237">
                <text>1950</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2238">
                <text>Green, Martin; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2239">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2240">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2241">
                <text>[Preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2242">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2243">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74426">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80987">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87548">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94109">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="281" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="72">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/1e8c795fb4f587faa06c7827a2d53d1f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8dbcc77f9a018fd443642f4f0191daf3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100698">
                    <text>\Lz.

MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS BY ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION

J.

JAFFE, M.D., H. ESECOVER, M.D., R. L. KAHN,
and M., FINK, M.D.
Glen Oaks, N. Y.

PHD.

This report is derived from a supervisory seminar in which the
effects of convulsive treatment upon psychotherapeutic transactions
were studied. The therapist’s observations have been described in
a previous publication (1) . The present paper describes the process
from the frame of reference of the supervisor and supervisory group.
It is intended as a complementary set of observations of this combined therapy. In addition, concurrent neurophysiologic data are
included, of which both therapist and supervisor were unaware.
This additional frame of reference may broaden the understanding
of certain phenomena in the patient-therapist, and therapist-supervisor interactions. Our purpose is to demonstrate that the introduction of a measurable physiologic variable is a useful method for the
investigation of the psychotherapeutic process.
The histories of the patients under study were given in the
above-mentioned publication (1). In the following report, a detailed analysis of one of the cases" discussed in that paper is presented as most illustrative of the modiﬁcation of interpersonal
transactions by altered brain function. The patient, a 44—year-old
widow and mother of a 12-year-old son, had been admitted to the
hospital with symptoms of depression, anxiety, anorexia, varied
physical complaints, and feelings of unreality and isolation. In
her psychotherapeutic sessions she would reiterate her difﬁculties
in a complaining pattern, repetitiously illustrating her inadequacy.
During a three-month-period no improvement occurred and a course
of electroshock therapy was recommended. At this juncture the
patient was included in the present study.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry (56151) and grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.
The assistance of Miss Esther Sanders and Mrs. Anita Bellow, who participated actively in the seminars, is gratefully acknowledged.
:

*

Case

#3, G.

C.

46

Reprinted from

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, Vol.
pages 46—55. January, 1961.

XV, No. 1,

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

47

The setting was a weekly multi-disciplinary supervisory conference. Included in the group were: (a) the therapist (H.E.),
(at the time a senior resident in psychiatry), who presented the case
material; (b) a social worker who reported the response of the
patient’s family; (c) a psychoanalyst (J .J .), Who dealt mainly
with the didactic aspects of psychotherapeutic technique; (d) a
psychologist (R.K.), who studied the cases independently; and (e)
a neuropsychiatrist (M.F.), who coordinated the discussion. The
last two members were aware of the concomitant changes in physiologic measures, and although this information inﬂuenced their
questions, the data were not introduced at these conferences. The
actual somatic treatment was performed by a physician who was
not a participant at the meetings.
The procedure was informal, with the therapist taking the lead
in presenting his verbatim notes of the psychotherapeutic sessions.
The order of the case reports and the amount of time devoted to
each was not prescribed. Following the spontaneous case presentation, more directive questioning was introduced, aimed at clarifying and relating the information presented by therapist and social
worker.
Observations made during the period of somatic therapy are depicted in the accompanying chart. During the 94 days of supervision, two different forms of somatic treatment were utilized. This
procedure was part of a hospital-wide convulsive-subconvulsive control study then in progress, in which therapists were unaware of the
introduction of subconvulsive phases of treatment.
.
For the ﬁrst treatment period (27 days) the patient received
subconvulsive electro-stimulation with pentothal premedication.
Twelve such treatments were given at the rate of three per week.
No changes in the quantitative measures of EEG slow wave activity
(2) were manifest during this time. This period served to establish a baseline for the behavioral observations and the expectancies
of the staff.
In the second treatment period (29th to 59th day), grand mal
convulsions were induced three times weekly for a total of 14 treatments. In that period, minimal degrees of EEG change were recorded on the 37th day, and moderate degrees were shown on three
subsequent recordings. Twelve days after the termination of convulsive therapy, EEG slow wave activity was considerably diminished. This information was not available tothe therapist or the
supervisor until after the conclusion of the study.

�‘

arr-ﬁr».

48

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
EFFECT OF CHANGING BRAIN FUNCTION
ON PSYCHOTHERAPY
SUPERVISORS
REPORT OF

DISCOURAGEMEHT.

AVOIDINCE

FRUSTRATION.
EXHORTATION

APlST'S ATTITUDE
TNEFMPIST'S REPORT

'SLIGNT

CHANGE'

(MINIMIZEDI

DEPRESSED. couPanmG.
SELF—REPROACHFUL,

OF FATIENT'S

A" ITUDE

HELPLESS,

HEW COMPLAINTS
PARTICIPATION IN

ACTIVITIES

I I

mnznlon
}
DEPRESSION

I

I

"ORE COMFORTABLE,
EASIER TO RELATE.
POSITIVE FEELINGS

CAUTIOUS,
SOLICITOUS

CHEERFUL, PRIMPING,

SELF-

CONVERSATIONALJRUSTING.
AFFECTIONATE. ADULATING

I
I

I

I

“APPRAISAL.
SUPPORTIVE,
DETACHED

ASSERTIVE.
OBJECTIVE. INDEPENDENT;
ANXIOUS

I I

ANXIOUS

.. .—

I __

__

20~
PAGES

nous
Unaware
5553101:

m

10'

0

WW

.........

26EE 6

". nu: nun)
scum

TREATMENT

°"""°°""‘
I-COWULSIVE

n'0-

:—

-

_-..

B_|—|_I____J__J_l—J_L_'.l—L—L——L—J—-l——I—-—J___
85 70 75 80
55

0

5

DAYS

l0

[5

20

FROM

60
40 45 50
ONSET OF SOMATIC THERAPY
25

30

35

The patient was seen in psychotherapeutic sessions three times
weekly throughout her hospitalization. While the therapist was
he
somatic
was unaware that
of
treatment,
the
concurrent
aware
subconvulsive stimulation was given initially, and of the change to
convulsive therapy on the 29th day.
Changes in the patient-therapist relationship as reported in the
supervisory meetings are summarized in the chart and are detailed
below.

Supervisors’ Notes
Ist to 19th day: During the ﬁrst three weeks the therapist did
not discuss this patient in the supervisory group. Other patients
occupied the allotted time, in spite of a resolution to consider each
patient weekly.
In retrospect, the failure to report this patient’s progress canstituted a pattern of avoidance. Somatic therapy had not modified
the patient ’3 ward behavior or the doctor-patient relationship. Both
were the same as in the initial months of hospitalization. The neurophysiologic indices were unchanged.
20th to 33rd day: The case history was ﬁrst presented in the
meeting on the 20th day. The therapist reported no alteration in

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

4:9

the patient ’3 clinging, whining, helpless attitude throughout the
preceding three months. Efforts to explore her problems in living
were blocked by physical complaints and by recitals of guilt, selfreproach, and feelings of failure. He was left little opening for
comment.

In the three supervisory meetings during this period the group

atmosphere was one of discouragement whenever this case was presented. The therapist reported impulses to exhort the patient to
participate in ward activities, and reacted to her professions of helplessness with the feeling that “she wasn’t trying.”
The family reported that the patient considered her doctor “too
young,” reﬂecting her attitude of reproach toward those who were
unable to help her. He, in turn, felt that she was “throwing up
her hands and giving up.”
The therapeutic impasse was empathically communicated to the
group by the case report. The transactions during this period were
typically those leading to referral of depressed patients for somatic
(i.e., nan-verbal) treatment. They may be characterized as follows.
Verbal methods of therapy are incompatible with the affective mode
of communication adopted by such patients (3'). The doctor’s
efforts to help are not met by a collaborative response, and he feels
frustrated. The insatiable quality of the patient’s demands also
calls forth defensive reactions in the therapist.
During this period the mode of somatic treatment was changed
from subconvulsive to convulsive. The clinical status and therapeutic relationship, however, continued unaltered. Perhaps the lack
of the expected response of somatic treatment contributed to the
therapist’s discouragement. He assumed that convulsions had been
induced from the outset, and his past experience had led him to
anticipate a clinical response by the fourth week of treatment (2).
34th to 42nd day: In the meeting that took place on the 38th
day, a “slight change” was reported. Although the patient was
still “crying, ranting, raving” in therapy sessions, it was also noted
that “she participates in activities a little bit more, but not much.”
The therapist and the group discounted this change in social relationships. The ﬁrst spontaneous complaint of memory difﬁculty
was also reported.
The ﬁrst evidence of neurophysiologic change appeared at this
time. The EEG taken the day prior to this meeting showed a signiﬁcant increase in slow wave activity.

�50

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY

43rd to 63rd day: In the meeting on the 45th day the therapist
reported a full psychotherapeutic session for the ﬁrst time. He described the patient as “brighter,” “with a little more rouge and
lipstick” and “smiling.” Two days later her mood was noted as
“euphoric.” Physical complaints ceased and were replaced by complaints of forgetting. The therapist described this as a “cessation
of complaining.” Concomitantly, the affective mode of expression
was replace-d by a more intellectualized pattern. Instead of stating
“I have to cling to my mother,” the patient said “I’m dependent
on my mother for many things.” This was described as “talking
about her dependency in a different way.” Another change in
communication pattern evoked ‘ ‘uncanny’ ’ feelings in the therapist.
He stated that the patient “mentions things we had talked about as
if it were new information.” With these changes, there was a concomitant increase in the patient ’s sociability and participation in
hospital activities, and a diminution of her clinging to the family
and therapist. The supervisory group atmosphere also changed—
from one of hopelessness to well-being, with increased joking, smiling, and animated participation.
On the 52nd day the therapist reported that the patient dressed
seductively and applied fresh make-up for her sessions. She expressed feelings of trust and enjoyment of the meetings. The doctor
experienced similar emotions, and was eager to report the progress
of this patient. She was now “upset” because she couldn’t recall
her problems, and the therapist noted that he was inclined to a
directive “remembering” role. She complained of memory loss and
attempted to relate in a friendly, realistically gratifying way to
prevent further psychologic exploration.
A greater detachment from her family was expressed. Social improvement continued. The family stated that she no longer considered the doctor “too young,” but rather a “guiding angel.”
The abrupt, gross change in the clinical picture paralleled the
development of maximum physiologic change. The three EEG- records during this period showed a moderate degree of slow- wave
activity. The advent of positive feelings elicited reciprocal emotions in the therapist which were cammunicated in the supervisory
sessions. The aﬂect was empathically reﬂected in members of the
conference group. (The clinical picture resembled that of a “transference cure.” )
It is of interest that a change from “ physical” to “memory”

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

51

complaints was described as a “cessation of complaining.” Perhaps
the memory deﬁcit, an expected concomitant of convulsive therapy,
is more acceptable to the staff because it is understandable. They
feel a responsibility for this symptom and can authoritatively reassure the patient that it will be transient. An aﬁectionate dependency may also be more tolerable than a hostile one, especially when
accompanied by gratifying social improvement. The language
changes are indicative of a more detached, intellectualized cammunication of familiar content (4). The patient now “talked about”
rather than emoting or “acting out.” This new language pattern
was more in keeping with her background of college education, and
the therapist’s implicit expectations (5‘). In contrast to her prior
mode of communication it seemed to be more compatible with a psychoanalytioally-oriented approach. The concomitant development
of memory diﬁiculty, however, perpetuated the essentially non-insightful therapeutic situation.
64th to 72nd day: This period followed the termination of somatic treatment. The patient reported a “sudden feeling of selfawareness.” Euphoria and memory difﬁculty were no longer Observed, and an anxious state supervened. Psychotherapeutic sessions were characterized by more critical appraisal of her life
situation. For the ﬁrst time the doctor gave the patient extra time
in the sessions. The group voiced some concern that she was “slipping back.” When the patient occasionally talked positively about
career, emancipation from mother, and so forth, the therapist felt
called upon to respond optimistically, rather than to explore. There
was a revival of Old complaints.
At this point, the supervisor and therapist reviewed a tape-res
corded therapy session. A recurrence of the earlier verbal patterns
could indeed be identiﬁed. However, these occurred in circumscribed fashion rather than throughout the interview. The events
antecedent tO such periods were examined and the adaptive nature
of the recurrent affective patterns became apparent.
The EEG record during this period showed a considerable decrease in slow wave activity. There was a concomitant reestablishment of some of the communication patterns which preceded the
period of altered brain function. The conference group responded
with anxiety, reﬂected in the solicitousness of the therapist in prolonging the sessions.
The phenomenon observed in the supervisory group, for lack of

�52

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY

Statedependency.”
“electroshock
be
called
better
term, may
a
ments were made in the meeting such as “she’s slipping back,”
“needs more treatments” and “improvement not holding up.’
These statements imply that the hostile- dependent pattern was being
rather
depression,”
“a
nosologic
entity,
as
a
thought of primarily
than a mode of human relatedness. Perhaps because behavioral
it
now
alone,
means
psychologic
been
by
effected
had
not
change
seemed totally dependent upon the alteration in cerebral function.
The change in interaction was conceptualized as the result of the
brain syndrome, and not as a function of the doctor-patient relationship. Hence the group’s uneasiness on the sporadic reappearance of preconvulsive patterns. The detailed examination of a taperecorded session revealed the adaptive function of this more circumscribed occurrence of the complaints, and the phenomenon of
“electroshock dependency” was not observed in subsequent group
meetings.
73rd to 94th day: During this period a more stable psychotheraindebecame
The
more
patient
apparent.
was
relationship
peutic
assertiveselfand
of
compliance
discussed
problems
and
pendent
ness. Although her attitude remained positive and collaborative,
her adulation of the therapist diminished. In one session she said
She
was
at
you.”
I
unless
won’t
better
get
I
angry
get
“Maybe
less elated. She moved from the closed ward to an open cottage,
and began to work in the hospital library. Occasional episodes of
overt disturbance were treated by the therapist without solicitude.
His attitude was one of interest, support and detachment. They
discussed plans for discharge and outpatient treatment.
Subsidence of the changes in brain function resulting from convulsive therapy permitted a new integration of the doctor-patient
relationship. The pattern of a conventional psychotherapeutic
situation appeared, which differed both from the original negative
and the artiﬁcially induced positive relationships.

Therapist’s Notes as an Index of Relatedness
Following the conclusion of the study, another index of the psydescribed
Rioch
has
investigated.
was
relationship
chotherapeutic
staﬁof
index
notes
staff
of
as
an
volume
of
the
the use
progress
in
his
notes
a
had
The
kept
therapist
interaction
(6).
patient
standard stenographic notebook throughout the treatment. A gross
count of the number of pages of notes per session was made, and

�MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

53

is represented graphically on the chart. No written notes were
taken during occasional tape-recorded sessions, and these are omitted
from the chart. The change in the relationship is apparent from

the abrupt and persistent increase in note-taking from the 44th
day. This coincided with the ﬁrst gross change in the electroencephalogram. The notes taken by the two other psychiatrists in
the supervisory meetings followed a similar pattern (not illustrated), although with peaks of note-taking at the onset and again
at the waning of induced neurophysiologic change.
DISCUSSION

This report describes an investigation of psychotherapy when
somatic therapy is introduced as an adjunctive procedure. One
difﬁculty in the objective study of psychotherapeutic transactions
is the absence of a quantiﬁable and controllable variable. Adjunctive therapies, somatic and pharmacologic, provide such a variable.
They produce alteration in behavior as well as measurable neurophysiologic changes (2, 7). This opportunity has been utilized in
the present project. For example, one mode of adaptation to
altered brain function is a euphoric type of relatedness (8). The
occurrence of the phenomenon in this case permitted us to observe
how induced alternation of positive and negative attitudes call forth
similar attitudes in therapist and supervisor. Another illustration
was the discounting of the earliest clinical change during the 34th to
42nd day of treatment. The electroencephalogram indicated the
signiﬁcance of this beginning change in the relationship. The fact
that it was minimized demonstrates the obscuring effects of stalf expectancies. Finally, the alteration of brain function was accompanied by a change in complaint pattern, that is, from physical
symptoms to memory difﬁculty. This resulted in a new form of
the dependency relationship (43rd to 63rd day) which was experienced differently by the supervisory staff, with resultant change in
their feelings about the patient. This effect was also observed in
the patient ’s family group.
The observations also illustrate a phenomenon peculiar to supervision in group settings. We have called attention to the emotional
atmosphere of the group, which seemed to ﬂuctuate in accordance
with the therapeutic relationship being described. Hora (9) suggests that the supervisee may communicate the affective aspects of
his experience with the patient non-verbally in the supervisory meet-

�54

AMERICAN JOURNAL

or

PSYCHOTHERAPY

ing. His formulation is that “The supervisee unconsciously identiﬁes with the patient and involuntarily behaves in such a manner
as to elicit in the supervisor those very emotions which he himself
experiences while working with the patient, but was unable to convey verbally.” He also describes the diﬂusion of this affect in the
other participants of a supervisory seminar. Thus he reports that
“This observation has been subjected to repeated tests in seminars
where it was possible to verify the supervisor’s emotional perceptions by matching them with the emotional reactions of the other
participants present.” Our work supports such observations and
suggests the potential fruitfulness of studies of group dynamics
in supervisory seminars.
We have noted one change in relatedness resulting from the
somatic therapy that had a disjunctive effect upon the relationship
(45th day). The patient mentioned familiar topics “as if it were
new information.” The “uncanny” quality produced in the therapist and supervisor resulted from the temporary feeling that the
therapeutic relationship had no history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a great extent upon an accumulated body of
shared information. Both doctor and patient take this for granted,
and the inability to rely upon it may affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study, not discussed in this paper, showed
different patterns of response. These included transient paranoid
episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic, and other forms of
“acting-out” which were disruptive to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced behavioral change was related
to the personality of the individual patient and occurred at the
time of changing brain function (2). Also in each case there were
concomitant changes in behavior in the supervisory group.
Our experience also highlights some of the diﬂiculties that may
develop when the two modes of treatment are used concurrently.
Intensive psychotherapy is based upon the conviction of the eﬂicacy
of verbal communication for improvement of the patient ’s adaptation. In the case reported, a trial period of psychotherapy had been
ineffective in altering clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic treatment represented a decision against exclusive reliance
upon interpersonal communication as the therapeutic instrument.
When cerebral change was maximal, a “social recovery” occurred,
apparently unrelated to interpretation of psychodynamic factors.
When the induced neurophysiologic changes subsided, a recurrence

�[MODIFICATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TRANSACTIONS

'

55

of earlier communication patterns led the therapist to doubt that
the improvement could be perpetuated by interpersonal means
alone. To some extent this phenomenon was an expression of differing conceptual and linguistic systems inherent in the two modes
of therapy. It is related to the philosophical dichotomy described
by Hollingshead and Redlich (10) between practitioners using
somatic and analytically-oriented therapies.
SUMMARY

A study of concurrent somatic therapy and psychotherapy is
reported, in which simultaneous observations of serial changes in
brain function, the psychotherapeutic relationship and social adaptations were made. The observations in a group supervisory seminar reﬂected the pattern of neurophysiologic alteration.
It is concluded that the introduction of a measurable physiologic
variable is a useful method for investigation of interpersonal relationships.
1.
2.

3.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Eseeover, H., Jaffe, J. and Kahn, R. L.: Psychotherapeutic Techniques
with Electroshock Patients. J. Hillside Hosp, 7: 17, 1958.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
Resp0nse in Electroshock. Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 78: 516, 1957.
Cohen, M. 8., Baker, G., Cohen, R. A., Fromm-Reichmann, F., and Weigert,
E.: An Intensive Study of Twelve Cases of Manic-Depressive Psychosis. Psychiatry, 17: 103, 1954.
Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock
Therapy. In Psychopathology of Communication, P. Hoch and J.
Zubin, Eds., Grune &amp; Stratton, 1958.
Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital. A.M.A. Arch.
Gen. Psychiat, 1: 565, 1959.
Rioch, D. McK.: Research in Psychiatry: Certain Problems and Developments in Multi-Disciplinary Studies. T. W. Salmon Lecture, New York
'

4.

5.

6.

Academy of Medicine, 1957.
7. Fink, M.: A Uniﬁed Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic Therapies.
J. Hillside Hosp, 6: 197, 1957.
8. Fink, M., Kahn, R. L. and Green, M.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. Dis Nero. Sys., 19: 113, 1958.
9. Hora, T.: Phenomenology of the Supervisory Process. Am. J. Psychother.,
11: 769, 1957.
10. Hollingshead, A. B. and Redlich, F. 0.: Social Class and Mental Illness.
J. Wiley &amp; Son, New York, 1958.

��Modification of Psychotherapeutic and Supervisory
Relationships by Altered Brain Function

J. Jaffe,

M.D., B. Esecover, M.D.
R.L. Kahn, Ph.D. a M. Fink, M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
From

Aided, in part, by the Foundations' Fund for Research in
Psychiatry (56-151) and grant M-927 of the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health

Service.

assistance of Miss Esther Sanders and Mrs. Anita Bellow,
caseworkers in the Department of Social Services, who participated
actively in the seminars, is gratefully acknowledged.
The

VII: 11-15-58

�Modification of Psychotherapeutic and Supervisory
Relationships by Altered Brain Function
seminar
from
a
supervisory
derived
is
psychotreatment
upon
convulsive
of
which
the
effects
in
The
studied.
therapist's
were
communication
therapeutic
observations have been described in a previous publication
(2), and are based mainly upon his personal experiences
with the patients. The present paper describes the process
intended
as
is
of
frame
reference.
It
from the supervisor;s
combined
complex
of
this
observations
of
a complementary set
data
is
neurophysiologic
concurrent
In
addition,
therapy.
unaware.
were
and
supervisor
both
which
of
therapist
included,
This additional level of observation seems to account for
and
the
in
patient-therapist,
certain clinical phenomena
This report

therapist-supervisor interactions.
Our purpose is to demonstrate that the introduction
method
a
useful
is
variables
of measurable physiological
for the investigation of the psychotherapy process.

�METHOD:

setting was a weekly multi-disciplinary conference
composed of five people, and thus departed from the conventional
supervisory situation. The group included: a) the therapist
(H.E.), at the time a senior resident in psychiatry, who
presented the case material; b) a social worker assigned to
The

the cases selected for study, who reported the on-going
response of the patient's family; c) a psychoanalyst (J.J.),
who dealt mainly with the didactic aspects of psychotherapeutic
technique; d) a psychologist (R.L.K.), who had studied the
cases independently; and e) a neuropsychiatrist (M.F.), who
coordinated the discussion. The last two members were aware
of concomitant changes in the physiologic measures, and although

this information influenced their questions, the data was not
introduced at these conferences. The actual somatic treatment
was performed by a physician who was not a participant at the
meetings.
procedure was informal. The therapist took the lead
in presenting verbatim notes of his psychotherapy sessions
with five patients receiving combined therapy. The order of
The

the case presentations and the amount of time devoted to each
was not prescribed. Following the spontaneous case reports,

directive questioning was introduced, aimed at clarifying
and relating the information presented by the therapist and the
social worker. Although roles were defined, the atmosphere was
one of inquiry in which no participant claimed a definitive
answer to the problem under investigation.
more

.

�m

SUBJECT:

case histories of the subjects of this study were
In
a
this
(2).
report
in
a
publication
previous
reported
most
#3
as
Case
clearly
of
is
presented
detailed analysis
illustrative of the modification of interpersonal transactions
The

widow
old
year
by
patient,
and mother of a 12 year old son, had been admitted to the
hospital because of depression, anxiety, anorexia, multiple
somatic complaints, and feelings of being "unreal" and isolated.
In therapeutic sessions she would reiterate her difficulties
'in a persistent complaining pattern, as illustrations of her

altered brain function.

This

a hh

After a three month period of
psychotherapy without alteration in the clinical condition it
was decided co utilize a course of electroshock therapy. At
this time the patient was included in the present project.
More detailed description of the psychotherapy sessions is
included under "Observations" below.

failures

and inadequacies.

SOMATIC THERAPY:

during the intercurrent somatic
therapy are depicted in the accompanying chart. During the
9b days of supervision two different forms of somatic treatment

'Serial observations

made

This procedure was part of a convulsivesubconvulsive control study then in progress, in which the
therqmd.was unaware of the introduction of the subconvulsive

were

utilized.

phase of treatment.

�-hFor the

first

period the patient received subconvulsive
electrostimulation with pentothal premedicaticn. Twelve such
treatments were given at the rate of three per week. No
manifest changes in quantitative analyses of the degree of
the
EEG (3) were observed during this time:
in
delta activity
This period established a baseline for the behavioral observations and the staff eXpectancies.
Grand mal convulsions were induced from the 29th to the
59th days of somatic treatment, also at a rate of three per
week for a total of 1h treatments. In this convulsive period,
minimal degrees of electroencephalographic delta activity
appeared on the 37th day, and moderate degrees were shown on
three subsequent recordings. On a follow-up record 12 days
after the termination of convulsive therapy the delta activity
had decreased considerably. This information was not available
to the therapist or the supervisor until after the conclusion
of the study.
The patient was seen in psychotherapy sessions three times
a week throughout her hospitalization. While the therapist
was aware of the concurrent somatic treatment, he was unaware
of the fact that subconvulsive stimulation was given initially,
and of the change to convulsive therapy on the 29th day.
The changes in patient-therapist relationship as reported
in the supervisory meetings is summarized in the chart and
is detailed in the following observations.
-~‘ -------Figure I
27 day

�OBSERVATIONS:

let to

19th day:
During the first three weeks of somatic treatment
the therapist did not discuss this patient in the supervisory
in
the
time,
allotted
occupied
Other
all
patients
group.
the
in
about
hear
to
patient
every
of
resolution
our
spite

study each week. The case histories presented during this
time were those of patients undergoing gross day-to-day
changes in clinical behavior.
Comment:

retrospect, we consider the omitted presentation
A
communication.
pattenlof avoidance
to be a significant
characterized this period. The neurophysiologic
indices during this time were unchanged. Similarly,
the patient's clinical status and the doctor-patient
months
the
three
in
same
the
as
were
relationship
In

preceding somatic treatment.
20th to 33rd day:
The case history was first presented in the meeting on
the 20th day. Over a three month period the psychotherapeutic
unable
to
the
being
been
had
unchanged,
therapist
relationship
discern any alteration in the patient's clinging, whining,
in
her
living
problems
to
explore
Efforts
attitude.
helpless
of
and
by
long
recitals
complaints
blocked
by
were
physical
In
three
the
of
and
failure.
feelings
self—reproach,
guilt,

supervisory meetings during this period the group atmosphere

�-6was one of discouragement when

this case

presented. The
therapist reported impulses to exhort the patient to
participate in ward activities, and reacted to her professions
of helplessness with the subjective feeling that "she was'nt
trying." The reproach against those who were unable to help
her was reflected in the family's report that the patient
considered her therapist "too young."
was

Comment:

therapeutic impasse was empathically
communicated to the group by the therapist's report.
The interaction during this period may be characterized as follows: After prolonged, unsuccessful
efforts at verbal communication the psychotherapist
is realistically frustrated (I). The affective mode
The

patient rendered
essentially verbal techniques useless. The doctor's
efforts to help were not met by a collaborative
response, while the insatiable quality of the patient's
demands may also have called forth defensive
reactions in the therapist. Such interactions are
typically those that lead to the referral of psychotically depressed patients for somatic, 3,3. nonof communication adopted by the

verbal forms of therapy.
During this period the mode of somatic treatment
was changed from subconvulsive to convulsive. The

clinical status

and

therapeutic relationship however,

�-7continued unaltered. Perhaps lack of the expected
response to somatic treatment contributed to the
therapist's discouragement. He assumed that
convulsive therapy had begun at the outset, and
his past experience had led him to anticipate a
clinical response by the fourth week of treatment (3).
Bhth to h2nd day:
In the meeting that took place on the 38th day, a

"slight change"

reported. Although the patient was
described as still "crying, ranting, and raving“ in therapy
sessions, it was reported that "she participates in activities
a

little bit

was

more, but not much."

The

therapist

and the

tended
to minimize the social improvement. The first
group
spontaneous complaint of memory difficulty was also reported
in this meeting.
Comment:

retrospect, the first evidence of neurophysiologic change had appeared at this time. The
electroencephalogram on the day prior to this meeting
showed a significant increase in delta activity. The
In

group discounted the concomitant observation of

clinical

change in view of a

persistent hostile-

dependent transference, and negative counter-

transference feelings.

�23rd to 63rd day:
In the meeting on the hSth day the

therapist

spontaneously reported a full verbatim psychotherapy session
for the first time. The patient was described as "brighter,"
"with a little more rouge and lipstick," and "smiling."
Within the next two days he described her mood as ”euphoric.”
Physical complaints ceased and were replaced by complaints

of forgetting. The therapist, however, described this change
as a cessation of "complaining." There was a change in the
form of verbal expression although the content remained the
same. Her affective mode of expression was replaced by an

intellectualized pattern.

For example, instead of complaining
mother" the patient said, "I'm

"I have to cling to my
dependent on my mother for many things." The therapist
described this change as "talking about her dependency in a
different way." Another of his observations, however, was
reported with "uncanny" feelings which were shared by the
supervisor. He stated that the patient "mentions things we
had talked about as if it were new information."
With these changes, there was a concomitant increase in her

sociability

participation in hospital activities, and a
diminution of her overt dependency upon family and therapist.
The supervisory group atmosphere at this time changed from one
of discouragement to a feeling of well-being, with increased
Joking, smiling and animated participation.
and

�-9the 52nd day the therapist reported that the
patient dressed seductively and applied fresh make-up for her
therapy meetings. She expressed feelings of trust and enjoyment
of the sessions. The doctor experienced similar emotions, and
was eager to report the progress of this case. The patient
was now "upset" because she could'nt remember her problems,
and the therapist noted that he was being continually led into
a directive "remembering" role. He felt the patient used her
memory loss as a defense against further psychologic exploration,
and that she preferred to maintain the relationship on a
0n

friendly, realistically gratifying level.
A greater detachment from her family was also expressed.
Indicaﬁma of social improvement were prominent. The family'
stated that she no longer considered the doctor "too young,"
but rather a "guiding angel."
Comment:

abrupt and gross change in the clinical
picture paralleled the development of maximum
physiological change in this case. The three
electroencephalograms during this period showed
a moderate degree of delta activity.
The advent of markedly positive feelings
elicited reciprocal emotions in the therapist.
These were communicated in the supervisory sessions,
and were empathically reflected in members of the
conference group. The clinical pattern resembled
that of a "transference cure."
The

�-10-

It is

of

interest that

change from "physical"

to "memory" complaints was described as an overall
"decrease in complaining." Perhaps a memory deficit,

expected concomitant of convulsive therapy, was
;MOre acceptable to the staff because it was understandable. They felt some responsibility for this
Syphon and could authoritatively reassure the
patient that it would be transient. It is also
probable that an affectionate dependency is more
tolerable than a hostile dependency, especially
when accompanied by obvious and gratifying social
an

improvement.
The language changes were

indicative of a more
detached, intellectualized'communication of familiar
content (8). The patient at this time "talked
about“ rather than emoting or "acting out." These
new language patterns were consistent with her
college education and, in contrast to her prior
mode

of communication, appeared to be more compatible

with a psychoanalytically-oriented approach. However,
there was the concomitant development of memory
difficulty, exemplified by her introduction of
previously discussed topics as new information.
The

ne.t effect

thus a non-communicative
situation with regard to interpretive insight
therapy.
was

�-116hth to 72nd day:
This period followed the termination of somatic

treatment. The patient reported a "sudden feeling of selfmemory
The
awareness."
euphoria and
difficulty were no
longer observed, and an anxious state supervened. The content
of the psychotherapy sessions changed to a more critical
appraisal of her life situation. For the first time the
therapist gave the patient extra time in the sessions. The
group voiced some concern that she'was "slipping back." When
the patient occasionally talked positively about such problems
as her emancipation from mother, the therapist was inclined
to respond optimistically, rather than to explore. She reacted
to this with a revival of old complaints.
At this point, supervisor and therapist reviewed a tape
recorded therapy session. A recurrence of the earlier pattern
could indeed be identified, although in circumscribed fashion
rather than throughout the interview. It was possible to
examine the antecedent events in the session and to clarify
the pattern as an adaptive response to stressful content.
Comment:

electroencephalogram during this period
showed a considerable decrease in slow wave activity.
There was a concomitant reestablishment of some of
the communication patterns which preceded the
The

period of altered cerebral function.
group responded with uneasiness which

The

supervisory

was

reflected

�.12in the solicitousness of the therapist in
prolonging the sessions.
At this point a phenomenon was observed in
the supervisory group which, for lack of a better
term, may be called "electroshock dependency."
Statements were made in the meeting such as,
"she's slipping back," "needs more treatments,"
and "improvement not holding up." These statements
imply that the hostile-dependent pattern constituted
a nosologic entity - ”a depression" - rather than

relatedness. Perhaps because
therapeutic change could not be a effected by
interpersonal means alone, its persistence seemed
dependent upon the alteration in cerebral function.
The change in interaction was thus being conceptuala mode of human

ized as the result of the brain syndrome, and not as
a function of the doctor-patient relationship.
Hence the group's uneasiness on the sporadic
reappearance of the pre-convulsive interaction
pattern. The detailed examination of a tape-recorded
session revealed the adaptive function of this more
circumscribed occurrence of the complaints, and the
phenomenon of "electroshock dependency" was not
observed in subsequent group meetings.

�-13.
23rd to 9hth daz:

During

relaionship

this period

stable psychotherapeutic
patient became more independent

a more

apparent. The
and discussed problems of compliance and self-assertiveness.
Although her attitude remained positive and collaborative,
her gross adulation of the therapist diminished. In one
session she said, "Maybe I won't get better unless I get
angry

was

at you.“

She was

less elated.

She moved from a

closed

ward to an open

cottage, and began to work in the hospital
library. Occasional episodes of overt disturbance were
handled by the therapist without solicitude. His attitude
was one of interest, support and detachment. Patient and
therapist discussed plans for discharge and outpatient treatment.
The patient was discharged six weeks later.
Comment:

Subsidence of the changes in brain function
resulting from convulsive therapy permitted a new

integration of the doctor-patient relationship.
The pattern of a conventional psychotherapeutic
situation appeared. This differed both from the
original negative and the artificially induced
positive transference relationships.

�WW
Therapist's notes as

an index of

relatedness:

Following the conclusion of the study, another index
of the psychotherapeutic relationship was investigated.

Rioch (9) has described the use of the volume of

staff

progress notes as an index of staff-patient interaction.
The therapist had kept his notes in a standard stenographic
notebook throughout the treatment. A gross count of the
number of pages of notes per session could be made. This
is represented graphically on the chart. As no written notes
were taken during the occasional tape-recorded sessions,
these were omitted from the chart. The change in the
therapeutic relationship is apparent from the abrupt and
sustained increase in note-taking from the hhth day on.
This coincided with the first gross change in the electroencephalogram. The notes taken by the two other psychiatrists
in the supervisory meetings followed a similar pattern,
although with peaks of note-taking at the onset and again
at the waning of induced neurophysiologic change.

�DISCUSSION:

primary purpose of this report is to demonstrate the
value of a detailed investigation of psychotherapy when
somatic therapies are temporarily introduced as adjunctive
procedures. One of the difficulties in the objective study
of transference and countertransference phenomena is the
The

absence of a quantifiable and controllable variable. Adjunctive
therapies, somatic or pharmacological, provide such a variable.
They produce

alteration in behavior as well as concomitant,

measurable neurophysiologic changes (3, h). This opportunity
has been utilized in the present project. For example, one
of adaptation to altered brain function is a euphoric
type of relatedness (5). The occurrence of the phenomenon
in this case permitted us to observe how the induction of

mode

positive and negative transferences called forth similar
countertransference attitudes in therapist and supervisor.
Another illustration of this technique was our discounting
of the

earliest clinical

change during the Bhth to h2nd day

of somatic treatment. The electroencephalogram gave evidence
in favor of the significance of this beginning change in the

relationship. The fact that it was minimized demonstrates the
obscuring effects of staff expectancies. Finally, the alteration
of brain function in this course of psychotherapy was accompanied
by a change of the pattern of complaints i;g. from physical
symptoms to memory difficulty. This resulted in a modification

�-16..

of the dependency relationship (h3rd to 63rd day). The new
form of the relationship was experienced differently by the
staff, with resultant change in their feelings about the
patient. This effect was observed in the patient's family
group as well as in the supervisory group.

observations illustrate several other phenomena of
interest. One is peculiar to supervision in group settings.
We have called attention to the emotional
atmosphere of the
group, which seemed to fluctuate in accordance with the
therapeutic relationship being described. Hora (7) believes
that the supervises may communicate the affective aspects
of his experience with a patient by non-verbal means. His
formulation is that "the supervises unconsciously identifies
with the patient and involuntarily behaves in such a manner
as to elicit in the supervisor those very emotions which he
himself experiences while working with the patient, but was
unable to convey verbally." He also describes the diffusion of
this effect in the other participants of a supervisory seminar.
Thus he reports that, "This observation has been subjected to
repeated tests in seminars where it was possible to verify
the supervisor's emotional perceptions by matching them with
the emotional reactions of the other participants present."
Our work supports such observations and suggests the potential
fruitfulness of studies of group dynamics in supervisory
seminars.
We have noted one change in
relatedness resulting from
the somatic therapy that had a disjunctive effect upon the
The

�-17-

relationship (hSth day). The patient mentioned familiar
topics "as if it were new information." The "uncanny" quality
produced in the therapist and supervisor resulted from the
temporary feeling that the therapeutic relationship had no
history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a
great extent upon an accumulated body of shared information.
Both doctor and patient take this for granted, and the inability
to rely upon it may affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study,nct discussed in this paper,
showed different patterns of response. These included
transient paranoid episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic and other forms of "acting-out," which were disruptive
to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced
behavioral change was related to the personality of the
individual patient and occurred at the time of changing brain
function (3). Also, in each case, there were concomitant
changes in behavior in the supervisory group.
The limited scope of this study does not warrant general
conclusions as to the efficacy of concurrent somatic treatment
and psychotherapy. We have confined the discussion, therefore,
to the presentation of methodology and description of the
types of observations that can be made in such interdisciplinary
approaches.
Our experience does highlight, however, some of the
difficulties that may develop when the two modes of treatment
are used concurrently. Intensive psychotherapy is based upon

�-18a conviction as to the
the improvement of the

efficacy of verbal communication for
patient's adaptation. In the case
reported a trial period of psychotherapy had been ineffective
in altering clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic
treatment represented a decision against exclusive reliance
upon interpersonal communication as the therapeutic instrument.
When cerebral change was maximal a "social recovery" occurred.
This was apparently unrelated to interpretation of psychodynamic
factors. No increase in awareness of psychological relationships
was verbalised. When the induced neurophysiologic changes
subsided, there was a partial recurrence of earlier communication
patterns. This was accompanied by a brief period of doubt that
the modification of behavior could be perpetuated by interpersonal
means alone. To some extent this phenomenon was an expression
of the different conceptual and linguistic systems inherent
in the two modes of therapy. It is related to the philosophical
dichotomy described by Hollingshead and Redlich (6) between

practitioners using somatic and analytically-oriented therapies.
These considerations also arise in the use of psychopharmacologic
agents during the course of psychotherapy (h).

�SUMMARY:

study of the effects of concurrent somatic
therapy on psychotherapy is reported, in which
simultaneous observations of serial changes in brain
function, the psychotherapeutic relationship, and social
A

adaptation were made. The observations in a group
supervisory seminar reflected the pattern of neurophysiolcgical alteration.
It is concluded that the introduction of a measurable
physiological variable is a useful method for investigation
of the psychotherapy process.

�REFERENCES

l.

Cohen, M.B., Baker, 6., Cohen, R.A., Fromm-Reichman,
F., and Weigert, E.: An Intensive Study of Twelve
Cases of Manic—Depressive Psychosis, Psychiatry $1:
103, 195k.

2.

Esecover, 8., Jaffe, J. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychotherapeutie
Techniques with Electroshock Patients, J. Hillside
Hosp. 1: 17, 1958.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity
to Behavioral Response in Electroshock:Quantitative
Serial Studies,A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 1Q:
516, 1957.

3.

Fink, M.: A Unified Theory of the Action of Physiodynamic
Therapies, J. Hillside Hosp.g: 197, 1957.
Fink, M., Kahn, R.L. and Green, M.: Experimental
Studies of the Electroshock Process, Dis. Nerv. 81 .
$2: 113, 1958.
Hollingshead, A.B. and Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and
Mental

Illness, J. Wiley

&amp;

Son, N.Y. T953.

Hora, T.: Phenomenology of the Supervisory Process,
Am. J. Psychother. $1: 769, 1957.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During
Electroshock Therapy, in Pa cho atholo of
ZuSEn,
P.
3. §§3., Grune
and
Communication, Hoch,
&amp;

Stratton, 1958.

Rioch, D. McK.: Research in Psychiatry: Certain
Problems and Developments in Multi-Disciplinary

Studies, T.W. Salmon Lectures,
1957 (in press).

N.Y. Acad. Med.

�noditiaation at Pnynhothornputtta frannaettonu
By

tltnrod

Drain Junction

"tt‘,

H.B.. E. 3.00.7.7, K.D.,
R. L. “hn, Phonu ‘ﬁd ﬂ. link, 8.D.
‘0

Iron thy aspartulnt a: Bxportuonsal Psychiatry, £111.16. loupttal,
61.“ O‘k.’ L.I., ‘1’.
Aided. in part, by tho Foundationn' thud tar Research in Puyehiutry
(SénlSl) and grant 3-927 of the rational Inu‘itutc o: nuntnl
lualth, laticntl Inutitﬂna of nculth, v.5. Public loalth aarvtoo.
Tho aunt-tango or 31:: 83th.: sander: :nd Hrs. Anita DCIIOI, who
participated auttvoly in tho tcatnnra, 1. gratitully acknavludgod.

III 10/30/59

�this rlport ta darivnd from a luporvinory suntan:
in which thn affect. at convultivc trontncnt upon p;y¢ho~
thornptut1e trananotxanu war. studiud. rho thornpist'u
abrcrvntinnl havo boon douoribod in u previous publicattou
(2). in: proaoat pups: accorthcu thn pronoun tr.u tho
franc at ratcrcaco at tho atporvisor and ouporvinory
group. It 1! intondod an n aonplonontnry hot or
obaorVItioua at thin nonbinud therapy. In addition,
ouncurront neurophyulalogia ant: arc includad, of vhich
both thornpiat and supervisor var. unnuuro. this udditiouul
tram. of xutorenoo may broaden the underutnndiug or eurtnin
phonononu 1n the pattcnt-thcrapint, and therapiltulnparvitcr

tatcraottona.
to don-natratt that the intraduction
a: a unanurablo phyuiologiaul variablo 1: a ncctul Itthod
for the turoatixatinn a: tho payehothcrapy pronoun.
Our purpaao 13

�xxggan:

tho ootttag too o uookhr oulttodiooaplioory
ooporvtoovy oontorouoo. Ioalndod in tho group rotor o) tho
thoroptot (3.8.), (at tho ttno o senior rootdont in poynhiotrr),
who proooutod tho enoo uotortol;
h) o ooatol worhor who
roportod tho rooponoo at tho yotiont'o fonily; a) o poyoho~

onolyot (3.5.), who doolt mainly with tho d1doct1e oopocto
of psychothoropoutte toohniquo; d) o poychologiot (3.3.).
who studiod tho eoooo indopondontly3 and
o) o nonrepoyohiotrtot (8.!t). who coordinotod tho diocuooion. rho

loot tot nooboro wart ovoro of tho connooitont chouxoo 1:
phyoioloxtc honouroo, one olthough thlo intorlotton infloouood
thotr quoottouo, tho doto woo not introdtcod ot thooo toaforonooo.
rho octuol oo-otlo trootoout woo porforood by o phyoioion who

not o porticipont ot tho nootingo.
Tho pronodoro woo intoruol, with tho thoroptot toktnx
tho lood 1a prooonttnx hto vorbotto uotoo of tho poyohothoropy
Tho
ooootoao.
ordor of tho aooo roporto and tho ooount o:
tiuo dovotod to oath woo not prooorihod. Iolloring tho
opoutohoouo oooo pronoutotion, morn dironttvo quootiouiag
II! Introdoood, otood ot choritytnx and rolottns tho intoraotioa
proooutod by thoroptot ond ootiol vortor.
woo

�803130?!

the hintertee e! the enhaeate at thte study were
reported in e previeee publication (2). In thie report e
detailed enelyeie of Gate #3 (0.0.) 1- presented es meet
illustretive or the nodixieation of interpereomel trenaeetiene
by extered hrein function. This petieut, e hh your old vitae
end nether of e 12 yeer old eon, bed been ednitted to the
hoepxtel with eyaptone of depreeeion, enxiety, enorexie,
varied phyeicel complaints, end feelings é: unreelity end
isoletien. In psychotherapy eeeeione she would reiterete
her difficultiee in e cenpleining pattern, repetitiouely
illustretinx her inedequecy. During e three nonth period
an ilpreveaent occurred end A couree at electroehoek therepy
wee reeoeeended. At thte Junotute the patient wee included
in the preeent study.
vsg§;!:c_rnxnarr:
cheervetiene eede dertn; the period of eenetxe therepy
ere depleted in the euconpenying ehert. During the 9k deye
of supervision tee different levee e: eoeetie treetleut were
utilieed. This procedure wee pert e: e heepitel-wide
eonvuleiveoeubeeavuleive control etedy then in progreee, in
which therepiete were enewere at the introduction or enheonvuleive pheeee e: treetnent.
Fer the tit-t treeteent period (21 deye) the patient
received eebeenvuleive electra-etlaeletiou with pentethel

�‘h.
pronodiootiou. roolvo oooh trootnonto ooro givon ot tho
roto or throo por rook. lo ohonxoo in tho ooohtitotivo
looooroo o: 336 olov oovo ootivity (3) woro monitoot during
thio tins. fhio poriod oorvod to ootobiioh o booolino for
tho hohoviorol oboorvotiooo and tho oxpootonoioo of tho

otott.
In tho oooond trootnoht porioo (29th to 59th doyo),
grand nol oonvoloiono uoro ihduood thrioo wookly for o totol
o: 1h trootnonto. In thio ported, nioiaol dogrooo of EEG
ohongo ooro rooordod on tho 37th doy, ond uodoroto dogrooo.
woro shown on throo oohooqoont rooordingo. foolvo doyo
ottor tho toroiootino o: oonvuloivo thoropy, EEG slow wovo

ootivity

ooooidorohly dioioiohoo. this intoruhtioo woo
not ovoilohlo to tho thoropiot or tho ooporvioor until ottor
tho ooholuoioa of tho otooy.
woo

-ﬁ.‘.‘....‘..0ﬂd.ﬂ.
Pic.

1

about horo

-DO“-....‘..O-....
rho potioot woo ooon in poyohothoropy ooooiono throo
tiloo vookly throughout hor hoopitoliootion. Hhilo tho thoropiot
II! ovoro of tho ooooorront oonotio trootnoot, ho woo nnovoro

that oohoohvoloivo oti-olotion

woo

givon

initiolly,

ohd of tho

ohonso to convoloivo thoropy on tho 29th doy.

thongoo in tho potiont—thoropiot rolotionohip oo

roportod in tho ouporvioory lootiogo oro oonnorisod in tho ohort
ond oro dotoilod in tho following ohoorvotiooo.

�0188371

;tt

,IS!

2: 12th dgz;

firot throo

vookl tho thoropiot did not
dioeuoo thio potiont in tho ooporvioory group. othor potionto
oooupiod tho allottod tino, in opito o: o rooolutioa to
‘

Daring tho

conoidor oaoh potiont vookly.
Gounonts

In totroppoot, tho toiluro to roport
this potiont 'o pragrooo coaotitutod o
pottoru or ovoidoneo. sonotiu thoropy hod'
not Iodiriod tho potiont'o word bohovior or
tho doctor-potiont rolotioaohip. Both voro
tho onto to in tho initiol Iontho a: hospital-

iootion.
rho nonrophyoiologio indieoo voro
unohonxod.

20th to 22:4 dog:
rho oooo history

firot

prooontod in tho looting on
tho 20th doy. rho thoropiot roportod no oltorotion in tho
potiont'o clinging, whining, holplooo ottitudo throughout tho
proooding throo uontho. Errorto to oxplorovhor problouo in
1171:; uoro blookod by phyoieol oonplointo and by rocitolo of
woo

Ho
woo loft
of
toiluro.
tooling:
guilt, oolt-roprooch,
littlo oponiag £0» counont.
In tho throo ouporvioory nootingo during thio poriod
tho group otnoophoro woo ono of diluenrogonoat thou thio eooo
too prooontod. the thoropiot roportod inpulooo to oxhort tho

oud

�.6patient to participate in ward activitiee, and reacted to
her prereeeieue e: helpleeeneae with the feeling that *ehe
eaan't trying.‘
eoneidered
The taniiy reported that the patient
her
doctor "tee reung,' retleetiac he: attitede e: repreaoh toearde
theee who were unable to help her. He, in turn, felt that
eke wee 'threeiuc up he: hende and giving up.“
I

gelnenta

the therapeutic iayaeee eae eapathieaiiy oeuaenicated to the creep by the
cane repert. The transactiene during thie
peried were typically theee leading to
referral of depreeeed patiente for eeaetia
(i.e. noncverbel) treataent. they nay be
toileee.
Verbal nethede
ee
eharaeterieed
er therapy are inceepatible with the affective
made at cannunieetien adapted by each patiente
(1). The deetor'e atterte to help are not eat
by a eellaheretive reepenee, and he feels
treetratea. the ineatieble qeaiiﬁy er the
patient“ dean“ a1" «11. berth deteueive
veeetiene in the therapiet.
Baring thin period the node or eeaatie
treetaent wee chanced tree eaheenveieive to
eeaﬁleive. The elinieal etatne and therapeutic
relatienehip, hetever, eentiaaed unaltered.
Perhaps the lack of the expeated reapenee to

�.7.
eenetie treetnent eentributed te the

thereptet'e dieeeuregeuene. le eeee-ed
thet cenvuleteue nee been induced from
the euteet, end hie peet experienee bed
led hie te entteipete e elinieel reepenee
by the fourth week e: teeetlent (3).
to ytnd 63!.
In the aeetinx thet teak pleee en the 38th day, e
“alight chenlef wee reverted; Although the,pet1ent tee etill
revinxi
1n therepy eeeeiene, it wee elee
renting,
'eryinc,
neted thet 'ehe pertteipetee 1a eetivlttee e 11$t1e bit note,
but net naeh.’ {he therepiet end the group discounted ehie
ehenge an eeeiel relet30nehtpe. the tiret eyeateueoee oonpleint
at eeeery dittieelty'vee elee reported.
«age:

cennent:
the

Sir-t

evidenee er eeurephyetelegte
eheuge ep’eered et thie tine. the 3E6 teken
the any prter ‘0 thin leetlng eheued e

Wm

eixuitteent inereeee in slew

wave

eettvxty.

In the neeting en the hSth day ﬁne therepiet reyerted
e full perehetherepy eeeelee fer the rivet tine. Re deeertbed
the pettent ee 'brighter,’ ”with e little eere reuse end
lipetteh' end 'eetltng.‘ rue deye leﬁer her need wee meted
ee 'eupheric.‘ Phyeteel eonpleinte eeeeed end were replaced
by aenpleinte of forgetting. The therepiet deeeribed thie
ee e *oeeeetteu e: ceapleintng.‘ concomitantly, the effective

�.8.
expreeeien
wee repleeed by e eere intelleeteelieed
e:
pettern. Ineteed e: etetiux “I here to cling to I: nether“
the petieet eeid '1': dependent en ey nether ter may thus"
Thie eee deeerihed ee 'telhina ehent her dependency in e
different eey.‘ Another cheese in eeneenioetion pettern
eveked 'enoenny‘ reeliuge in the therepiet. ﬁe eteted that
the petient 'eentiene things we hed telhed ebout ee it it
were nee in:ereetien.'
With theee ehenzee,there wee e ceneeeitent iaereeee
in the petient'e eeeiehility end perthipetien in heepitel
eetiritiee, end e dieieetien er her clinging to the teeily
end therepiet. whe euporrieory group etueephere eleo changed free one e: hepeleeeneee te well-being, with increeeed aching,
eniling end enineted participation.
0n the 52nd dey the therapist reported thet the
petient are-led seductively end epplied treeh rehe-up for
eede

l

V

her eeeeiene. She expreeeed toelinge or treat end enjoyment
e! the neetinge. the doctor experienced einiler eeetiene,
end ere eexer to repert the pregreee of this oeee. fhe patient
wee new 'upeet' beeeaee ehe couldn‘t resell her prehlene, end
the therapiet noted that he wee inclined to e directive “re-ether.
He
end
she
of
leee
coupleined
memory
role.
ettenpted
felt
in:'
to relete in e triendly, reelieticelly gratifying we: to prevent
further peyuhologie exploration.
A greater deteehlent from her family wee expreeeed.
Seeiel ilpreve-eet continued. the felily eteted thet ehe no
'

�.9.
long-r onunidorud the doctur 'tao 1033;,” but rnihor a
'guiding nasal.“
Gunnontt

Eh: ubrupt,

groi-

ahnngo in tho

picturu parnnllud tn. duvolopttnt
or anxiaun physiological change. The

61131031

rayorda during this poriod uhovcd
u nodcratl ducts. of slaw wavo activity.
Tho udvunt or pcn1tsvo tooling: olicitod
-ruciprocnl elation: in thn thordpist which
1n
thu supervinery cautions.
caununicntad
utrt
tho attoat was alpsthic:11y rotluctod in
nonbiru at the conxcrcuoo group. (rho clinical
pioturc roaonbltd that at a 'trtunforonac auro.')
throo

EEO

It

10

.! iattraut

that I chant. tron

"physical“ to *nnncry’ eonplnintt was dolarlbea
1: I ‘uoaustton at oonpluiulnx.’ Pcrhupa the
notary dottctt, an expootnd oonconittnt or
oonvulntvc thurnpy, 1. nova acacptablo to the
lint: becauau 1t 1- underatundablo. Thu: £001
a rnaponaibility for this tynptoa tad nun
tuthorttativoly r033Iuro thu putlatt that it
will be transiant. in lifteticnuta dapcndoncy
any .100 be more tolorah1c thin a hastilt out,
when
ucconpnniod bi erutifyinz oaeinl
oupccinlly
improvonant.

Tho langungo

change:

3:. indicative

of a nor. deﬁnah‘d, intqlleotnnltacd ooununicntioa

�~10»

of taniltar content (8). Th. patinat nor
”talked abaut' ruthor thnn cunting or “acting
out.“ This nav 1:33:33. patttrn can nor. in
kooping with hat background or oulloau uduaataoa,
and the thcrtyint's inplioit unpoetutions (9).
In contrast to her prior node of cuuuuntcntton
1t canned ta to nor. noipgtiblo with a purchaauulytically-oriontcd approach. The concomitant
dovslopnant of honor: difficulty, howovur,
perpetuated thc cantnttully nonninalghtrul
thorapuutic nitnnticn.
65th to 12nd gig!
than ported followod tho termination a: sciatic
trontannt. fhe patiout Inverted a ”auddoa £90115: ’1 3011‘
cvnrouuuo.“ Euphorta and gentry attticulty wit! a. 19:10:
tbscrvud, tad an amnion. ltlt. :uportcnod. Payohothortpy
toutinnu worn nhnrtctor1s¢d by morn crittcal appruisal at
hot 11:. uitunttnn. tar tho first txun tho doctor 3:10 tho
Thu
tho
in
auctions.
tine
group voiced ton.
txtra
pattont
unacorn that aha wt. "olippiuc back.9 thn thd patient.
.ccactoually talkud positivolr nbout euro-r, cutncipttiou
tron lather, 333., the tharnpist tolt called upon to rospond
optiniutically, rather thug to explore. Thurs vs; I rtvivul
or old canplnintn.
At thin paint, tha supervilar tad thortpist roviovod
A
nuonion.
recurrence of tho ourltor
a tnruvroeordcd thtrupy

�vorbal putt-run could indeed be tdcntitiod. nauuvur, than.
coourrod 1n airuuunoribad fashion ruthor than throughout $30
intervinv. The «wont: nutcccdunt to Inch parlodn worn
attainad Ind tha adaptivh nature at the racnrront n£tocttvo
pnttornu haunt. apparant.
coununt:

tundra during this patina
showed a considorlbla duoranau in slow
The EEG

activity.

tn:

:

cauconitant
rocntabllihnant at IOII of tho connunieutlon
pattorna which pracedod tau period or altered
brain function. Th0 coutarsnco group responded
with nnxtoty rotlootod in the solicitouunnul
of tho thortpiat in pralongtnz in: sonoi¢ns.
the phononunan obsorvoa ta ta. nnpcrvitory
stain, for luck at a bottnr turn, may be callcd
'alcetronhack dupcndoaoy.‘ statoncntn were
lid. in tha matting such us 'cho'u slipping buck,”
"no.4. ucr- troutnonts* and ”taprovanont not
holding up.“ In... Itatcnonts inyly that the
hoitilcodcycndaat panama mm being thought a:
primarily as a nonalcgie ﬂntity, ”a dopraauiun,‘
rtthor than a node or Bantu ralatodnunn. Porhapa
hcuuuac hohuviorul chnngo had not boon attcctod
by psychologic Incas a1930, it new conned tottlly
dopondout upon thc alteration in acrcbrul function.
yaw.

Thurs

�1-1

a.

rha chins. 1n intoraction was «Qneoptltltibd
as th: roanlt of the brain syndroan, ﬁnd not
an a function of tho doatcrupntiont relation.
Edna.
tho graup'h «acacia... on 6h.
ahip.

sporadic rcappcaranco or praeouvrloivc
puttornt. Thu dotatlcd oxnuinattou of I
t‘po~racordud caution rqvualod ti. ndqﬁtvo
functtun or this not. circumacribod occurrcnon
of the canvlaiatt, tad the phnnancnon of
“electroshock dupnndunay' Vt! not obnorvod
in Inblcqucnt group nactinga.
12rd to 25th 4:13
baring this ported a not. stubln yuyvhothorupcntxc
rtlatitnlhip was upparont. the ptticnt boots. nor. tndcpnndcnt
and d£lcnalad prohlcno a! euupltauoo and uolt~aalurtavoucla.
Although hot at$1tudo rousinod petitivo and eollnborutivo, hi!
tdlllttin a: the thcrapiat diniutuhod. In on. 3.3.1.: ch.
:31! *luyho I vantt xnt buttor union. I get that: at run.“
an. ant lens olntad. 5h. ncvcd troy eh. cloned ward so an
upon 00:113., and bugnn *u Ibrk_1a the hospittl library.
Occulionll Ipinodul of ownrt disturbance war. ‘run‘cd by tho
thcrapiut washout salinituda. n1- attitude us: an: of intorant,
tappart sud datuchnont. 1a.: dtnouusod plan: tar dischargo
and

.u‘pntlunt ‘ruutnnnt.

�-13.
Gemnentz

Suhaidanaa

at tha chances in brain

fanation raaulting tron_cénvulaiva thorapy
permittad a not iatagration or the doatnrﬁ
patiant ralationahip. Thu pattern or a
céhvanttanal paychotharapaatic attuatiau
appeared, which airfarad both fro: the
crazinal negative and the artificially
induced poaitiva relatianahipa.
rharantat'a nataa an an ands: a: relatedness:
Following tha cancluaian of tho study, anathar 1ndax
at tho payehotharapautie ralattouahip was invaatigatad. ﬂinch
baa daaaribad the use of tha volume or stat: pragraaa nataa aa
an 134a: at ata£t«patxant intavactian (10). Tha thorapiat
had kapt ht. natal in a standard atanoxraphic notahoak thranzho
out tha troatnant. 1 grant count or the aunbar of vagaa or
nataa par tau-ion vaa maﬁa, and in rapraaantcé graphically an
aha chart. lo written meta. vara takan daring occasional
tapa¢raaardad aaaaioaa, and thaaa ara anittad from tho chart.
Tho chance in tha ralatienahip is apparant from tha abrupt
and paratatant incraaaa ﬁnnota taking from tho hhth day.
this aoiuuadad with tha tirat groan changa in tha alaatraanoaphalogran. Tho nut-a takon by aha two ethar psychiatriata
in tho unparviaory naatinga rallauad a aiuilar pattorn (not
illuatratad), although with peaks 6! actoatakinz at tha onaat
and again at the waning or inducad naurophwrialagta changa.

�.1h.
Iscusa I!hso vaport dasnrlbts an tnvonttgatian at vlrrhat&amp;orapy
adjunc$1vu
procuauru.
an
intracuucd
as
to
aauugio
thcrupy
than
and dtftiuulty in ﬁho fbj.¢$1V! Itudy of puyuhotharupcuttc
centrallﬁblu
ana
traanaatttaa it tho abnsncn a: I quanttraablt
pharnnool¢gtanl.
Ind
tauntia
thurapton.
variablo. ,gdduncttvo
bohuvior
in
altorgtioa
product
gravid. tank 1 varinblo. racy
was.
h).
(3.
change:
tn wall I! uniqurablu naurophyaiolauic
prudent.
«#111334
an.
in
hula
In
pnunt
urw‘utty
1.
tunntluu
brain
altcrud
ta
Ixtnpln, oat Iona a! tduyta‘ion
tho
Eh.
at
coaurrauco
(5).
r.1ato¢ncsu
0t
typo
tuphurio
I
haw
%o
inducud
obicrv.
an
phﬁnanouun in this 0:30 purai‘tcd
9511
forth
uttiﬂudto
‘nd
accltivo
altnrantioi .1 pontttv.
Anetta:
5nd
uupcrviuor.
‘hcruplut
tn
llnilnr uttitudca
011n1¢:1
unrlxunt
0:
tho
discounting
ti.
alluatrnﬁtoa wt;
The
Ilcutroa
hand
or
truntlnut.
ﬁhth
«:1
to
ahnauo during thi
beginning
this
.1
an.
:tgnatteuueu
instantad
ouctphnllarun
miniutsud
1t
thut
Th.
tau!
ﬁll
13
tho
ralnttonuhip.
chnng.
dcnnunﬁrt‘oo tho intestine «(Stats 0: uttxt .xpcotancicc.
by
«coup-uni“
um
mum.»
brain
of
”3.111,”:
from
uyaptcns
phywicul
1n
ﬁulplaznt
5¢3,,
puttarn.
oh‘nxt
:
the
of
3
tern
Thin
in
ruaultcd
ant
t0 nounxydtstiauzty.
which
oxportonocd
was
63rd
day)
to
(hjrd
dcp¢n¢¢u¢y rtlatlonahlp
shuns.
rcuul‘nnt
with
tun
supervinary
otatt,
atttortntly hr
nine
was
rhtu
0:3:ct
thy
p&amp;t1ant.
ubant
in thoir :nolinsa

w

unﬁt“:

�pstient'e resily group.
The oheervstions else illnetrete e phenoeeaeh
supervieion
we
heve celled
in
to
settings.
greep
peculiar
sttention to the emotional steoephere or the are up, which
seemed to fleateste in eoeerdenue with the therepeetie rea
Here
the
(7)
described.
thst
suggests
being
istieaehip
observed in the

supervises say eoanunisete the effective sepsete or his
experience with the pstient nenaverhsliy in the eupervisevy
nesting. his ternaletien is thet *The supervises unconsciously
identities with the petient end invelentsriiy hehevee in such
s esnner es te elicit in the supervisor theee very esstiens
which he himself experiences ehile working sith the petieat,
but use unehle to convey verbally.” He elso describes the
diffusion at this extent in the other psrtioipenta or e
supervisory sesiner. thus he reports that 'rhis ehservetien
hse been suhaeeted to repented tests in eeniners where it use
possible to vsrit’ the euyervieor'e enetiohel perceptions by
sstehinx thee with the eeotiehsl resctiens or the other
psrtieipents present.” Our work supports such observetiene
sud suggests the patentiel truitrhlnees or studies or group
dynsnies in supervisory eeeiuers.
we he's noted one ehenss in reletednese resulting
tree the seentie therspy that hsd e disasuetive effect upon
the rsletiehship (age dsy). the petieet mentioned teeilier
tepiee ”es it it were new infatuation.” the 'nnoenny‘ queiity
predeeed in the therepiet end supervisor resulted from the

�.16.
had
no
the
relationship
that
therapeutic
temporary feeling
history. Rapport in intensive psychotherapy depends to a
great extent upon an accuaulated body of shared inforaatien.
loth doctor and patient take this for granted, and the inability
to rely upon it nay affect rapport adversely.
Other patients in the study, not discussed in this
paper, showed different patterns of response. These included
transient paranoid episodes, hyperactivity, erotic, exhibitionistic and other forns of 'acting-out' which were disruptive
1

to the concurrent psychotherapy. In each case the induced
the
behavioral change was related to
personality of the
individual patient end occurred at the time of changing brain
function (3). Also in each case there were conconitant changes
in behavior in the supervisory group.
Our experience also highlights some of the difficulties
that nay develop when the two nodes of treatment are used
concurrently. Intensive psychotherapy is based upon the
conviction as to the efficacy of verbal communication for
iaproveaent of the patient's adaptation. In the case reported
a trial period of psychotherapy had been ineffective in altering
clinical behavior. The introduction of somatic treatment
represented a decision against exclusive reliance upon interWhen
communication
the
instrunent.
as
therapeutic
personal
cerebral change was aaxinal a “social recovery“ occurred,
apparentlr unrelated to interpretation of psychedynanic factors.
When the induced neurophysiologic changes subsided, a recurrence
of earlier oonnnnication patterns led the therapist to doubt
‘

,

�.17-

that in. iapravaaant oeuid ha parpatuatad by intarparaoual
aaana aloha. to can. extant thin phanauanan was an
expraaaioa a: diﬂlrint aancaptual and linguiatic ayataaa
ink-rant in in. two node: a: thorapy. It in ralatad to tho
philaaaphiaal dichotomy daacriboi by Haliiaxahaad and nadlieh
(6) batwaan practitionara using aoaatic and analyticallyariaatad Sharapiaa.
I

8931‘!!!

i

atady a: concurrant aquatic and payohatharapiaa ia
taperiad, in which ainnitanaoua obnorvationa of atrial
”in.
brain
in
function,
omgu
paychothanpaatio ralatiouahip
and social adaptation var. Iada. rho ohaarvationa in a
afonp aaparviaory salinar ratlaatad tha yattarn or natty;
phyaiologia altaratiou.
It ia canciudad that tho introduction or a aaaaarabia
phyaialosio variable in a aaatul aathod for investigation

at intarparaonai ralaiionahipa.

�-13.
BEIEREIGES

1.

count, 1.1., frusn~801¢hn&amp;un,
3iklf,
0.,
x.n.,
and Roigzrt, 3.: A: latch-ido‘stugy c§£r:01vo
1.,
cases .1 Han ouncprunl vs Pay: as a, Ila a g;
103' 1951‘

cohon,

u,

o

queovor, 3., Jntfo, J. and

Kuhn, R.L.¢ Payehnthcrnpoutic

foehniquoo with Eloctroahook Pattontl,
logz.‘1u 17.&gt;1958.

3.

rink,

J, Hill-1d.

l:hn, R.L.a Relation a: nun bolt: Activity
Quantitativo
to Inhaviorti Responao in Electronhoak.
Soraul stadium, A.H.A. Arch. laurel. &amp; Pnzchtat.lgu
H. and

516, 1957.

h. rink,

Emailed Theory of the nation or Phystodynaaic
l
l.:
ibtrnpiuﬁ, J, Hillside 30.2. g; 197. 1957.

5. Pink, l.‘hxnhn, R.L. and aroon, H.c Bxporinnntnl Studio:
of I nloctroahoek Fractal, Bin. Not. all. 32:
113, 1958.
6. lalliaglhand, 1.]. and lodlieh, 1.0.: Social Olunl tad
ﬂinttl Illnuln, J. U110: &amp; Son, . .,
.
7. Kora, 2.: Phononsnology 0! ‘ho Supurvisory Precast,

“O J. chhothor. E" 769, 1957.
8. tuba, 8.L. and rink, x.s chanson 1n Lungnngo During
Eltatronhock rhor‘py, 1n Palahgfathologi or
connnnieatl n, Inch, P. an I a, . o 3., Gran.
E 3!:35‘33, I956.
(aha, 3.1.. Polltck, H. and rink, K.: sociopuycholocic
Aspects a: Psychiatric rroatnnnt 1a a Volunttry
xcntal noupital, 1.3.5. Arch. Gen. Pazehiu . (1n

proul).

10.

Hal-I ROI-arch 1n Pcyuhiutryt curtain Prohlonu
sud Dovclepncntn in Hulttuﬁiaaiplinary studion,
2.8. Stlnon zocturor, l.!. laud. lad., 1957.

kiosk,

D.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2804">
                <text>Modification of psychotherapeutic transactions by altered brain function. Am J Psychother. 1961 Jan; 15:46-55.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2805">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2806">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-49-015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2807">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2808">
                <text>Jaffe J.; Esecover, H., Kahn, R. L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2809">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2810">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2811">
                <text>Reprint and two [preprints]. Reprint from AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, Vol. XV, No. 1, pages 46—55. January, 1961.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2812">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2813">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74483">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81044">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87605">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94166">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6743" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6549">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/8ad71ef7a3c44154da4264a3d36d2625.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d939faed36329ffba731bbff9e10004f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107154">
                    <text>An

Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric Interviews

Joseph

Jeffe,

H.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Read

at the

New

York

N.Y.

Divisional MBeting, A.P.A. November, 1957.

Supported by Grant 565561 of the Foundations' Fund for Research in Psychiatry.
14’!

10-1h-S7

�The

clinical interview is the psychiatrist's primary tool for the

diagnosis of psychopathology, the modification of behavior, and the

collection of research data.

Only

in recent years, however,

have the

actual transactions which comprise the interview been studied objectively.
Investigators of the interview have usually employed systems of
content analysis (1), which are based upon various theories of psychodynamics.

Currently, there

is increasing

emphasis upon formal aspects

of interaction such as temporal patterns of speech (1h) drastic change
of subject (3), PHYSiological relationships of the participants (2),

grammatical patterns of language (S, 6, 9), and speech disturbances and

silences (10). These aspects, in contrast to content categories, are

relatively independent of theoretical preconceptions,

and are more

readily

quantified and studied statistically.
In many investigations of these formal variables, however, the

total context of the
interview. These approaches neglect the fact that the psychiatrist is a
participant observer, i.e., a significant variable in the interaction
(11). Others have attempted to control this variable by means of
structured interviews in.which the doctor's contribution is standardized
patient's

communications are abstracted from the

according to a predetermined experimental design (6, 7, 1h). These

structured situations delete the very quality of living relationship that

is the ultimate

concern of the psychotherapist (7).

methods of verbal

We

are in need of

interaction analysis that neither preclude nor

prescribe the doctor's clinical responses.
The

this paper is to present a method of interview
a) is objective and quantitative, b) preserves the

purpose of

analysis which

�.2...

natural patient-therapist relationship,

and

c)

treats the interview

as an integrated system of interpersonal communication. This

is

accom-

plished by including the doctor's usual clinical behavior in the data
to be studied.
the

The raw

material is not the patient's speech, but rather

total verbal output of the

"two person" or "dyadic" group.

�Method:

tape recorded interview

The

is precisely transcribed,

without regard

to the speaker of the words. Careful attention is given to subtle

repetitions such as "I - I mean," "well as - as I say,"
polated expressions such as "you know,"

The

inter"so to speak," "as I said," etc.
and to

transcript is then arbitrarily divided into consecutive units of

100, 50 or 25 words depending on the discreteness of the phenomena to
be investigated. Thus a unit contains contributions of words from either

doctor or patient alone, or from both in varying proportions.
The measurement

applied to these units of dyadic Speech is the typetoken-ratio (TTR). This is an index of the balance between repetition

variety of words (12). The TTR is the ratio of the number of
different words (types), to the total number of words (tokensL in a
sample of language. For example, in a 100 word sample the repetition
of the identical word 100 times in succession would produce the lowest
and

possible ratio of .01
of 1.0 would

different

result

if

(l

type/100 tokens). The highest possible

every one of the 100 successive words were

(100 types/100

tokens). These extremes of stereotypy and

diversity are rarely encountered,
situations (8).
The

i.e.

"word-type,"

ratio

and then only

the numerator of the

in grossly pathological

TTR,

is arbitrarily

defined. All words are different which are pronounced or spelled

differently. Thus, ive, gives, gave, given and gizipgﬂ are considered
different types, as are "know" and "no." Vocalizations not clearly
"

�.u-‘
identifiable as
which

is

words are omitted, with the major exception of

"mmhmm"

a frequent utterance of the interviewer in our records.

Contractions are retained as single words, but vulgarisms such as "I
dunno" are

edited to read "I don't know."

The TTR

scores

is calculated for

is graphically plotted,

additional precision, the units
may be advanced 25 words

the

last half

at

unit

each

as

and the

illustrated in Figures

may be

first half

unit. This often smoothes the resultant curve.
is illustrated in Figure 3.
TTR

have

in a single person's language (12).

1 and

2. For

overlapped, e.g. 50 word units

a time, so that each unit

of the preceding and the

Previous studies of the

pattern of consecutive

is

composed

of

of the subsequent

The

overlapping technique

dealt with the overall average
The

sequential pattern in dyadic language.

present method studies the

�Observations:
In the

last eighteen

months approximately

sixty recorded interviews

this method.

The

material includes forty

patients in all diagnostic categories.

The

dyadic

have been inveStigated by

found to be sensitive

to a variety of clinical

TTR

patterns have been

phenomena

(8). This

report illustrates the changes in language interaction occurring during
the course of hospitalization and therapy, as well as changes in rapport

in individual interviews.

and defensive operations
A

- andic

TTR

Pattern in Clinical Change.

first

Figure 1 shows the pattern of the

three separate

1500 words of

interviews during the clinical course of one patient. The doctor is the

in each. This case

same

was

selected as an unequivocal example of gross

clinical change. In the first interview the patient

was

agitated and

depressed. She refused to be seated and paced about the room, reiterating
stereotyped self-recriminations, crying hysterically, with marked

pressure of speech. At the time of the second interview, following a
course of grand mal electroshock, the clinical picture was grossly altered.
She was

less agitated and

complaining of a memory
appeared

more

deficit.

cooperative, although withdrawn and
On

alert, poised, conversational

insightful.

She had been

The TTR of

later,

discharge two months
and,

she

at times, surprisingly

rated clinically as "recovered."

consecutive 25 word units of interaction, for each of

the three periods described, is graphically represented in Fig. 1.
Consecutive points are connected by lines so that the fluctuations in the
graph

reflect the difference

between successive scores.

The mean TTR

for

�~6-

the complete interview from which these samples were taken is represented

line through each graph.

by a horizontal

strates
The

a

The

fluctuating equilibrium about the

pattern of scores

mean.

interviews of these three successive stages

changes.

The mean

demon-

show a sequence

of

level of the interaction is seen to increase as the

clinical status changes from psychosis to "recovery." There is a concomitant restriction in the amplitude of the pattern, i.e. a decrease in
variation about the mean.
Comment:

The sequence of change

in the

TTR

pattern parallels the progressive

in interpersonal communication that

improvement

clinically.

was apparent

This suggests an approach to the quantification of

clinical

change, defined

as an altered pattern of verbal interaction in the interview.
B

-

in Communication‘within the Interview:

Changes

Figure
shown

2

is

an enlargement of the

in Figure 1.

first

of the three interactions

Here the sequence of changes

within a.single interview

are examined rather than comparing the patterns of successive interviews.
As

described before, the patient was speaking continuously in a disorgan-

ized affective outburst.
mﬂrich

The lower

line indicates the

the interviewer participated. Following

remarks, units

3

-

12

ﬁne

25 word

units in

doctor's introductory

represent the patient's uninterrupted speech.

Wide

oscillations of the pattern are prominent. From samples 13 onwards the
doctor made repeated efforts to communicate with the patient. Two independent judges reviewed the transcribed protocol, and both identified
three areas in which there seemed to be an understandable, rational

�-7interchange between the participants. These periods are labelled
"rapport" in the upper

line.

tions of the pattern are

much

During these three periods the

constricted.

Compare

oscilla-

other non-rapport

periods such as 23-2h and 39-hl, in which the doctor's participation
amplified the oscillations.
Cmmmnh

This

illustrates

a method of quantifying

interpersonal phenomena,

such as the degree of "contact" with a severely disturbed

patient.

The

affective pattern in this patient represents the psychotic integration,

for this reason, the occasional occurnnces of conventional,rational
conversation are described as periods of "rapport." The restriction in

and

the amplitude which characterizes these periods

is similar to the

overall pattern at the time of "recovery."
0

- Analysis
Figure

3

of a Complete Interview.

initial

demonstrates the

dvadic

TTR

analysis of a complete

interview. This interview is the discharge evaluation of a patient
had been hospitalized following a
months of

hospitalization, she

who

bizarre suicide attempt. After seven

had "improved"

clinically. This took the

form of a hypomanic mood and a gross denial of her severe emotional

conflicts.
word

The

interview

units advancing by

is

scored by the method of successive 50

ZS word

steps.

The mean TTR

for the interview

is shown by the horizontal line drawn through the graph. The pattern
falls into several natural segments. There are two areas in which ten
consecutive points fall below the mean (areas h and 7). These are
unusual in this interview. There are also areas of gross deviation

�~8from the mean (such as area

determine our

criteria for

2).

Thus we allow the

phenomena

for persistent changes in the

TTR

to be studied. In general,

we

look

level, gross trends or sudden shifts.

Several of the deviant areas are described to
The

objective pattern to

illustrate the

method.

interview begins with a hypomanic monologue in which the patient

visit

describes her successful

home,

her euphoric outlook and plans for

a rosy future.
Area 2 has been delineated because of gross deviation from the mean.
The

beginning of

this period coincides with

a change of topic to her plans

is interrupted
by a period of confusion as she tries, with some difficulty, to recall
one of the details of the job. The end of the gross fluctuation coincides
with the rationalization "I don't think I'll have too much trouble."
Area h was delineated as one of the two sections in which 10 consecutive
for going back to her job

scores

fall

two days hence.

Her optimism

Its beginning coincides with

below the mean.

about her depression on admission to the hOSpital.

a statement

This area ends with

the lowest score of the interview which,precedes by only a few words a
spontaneous reference to her suicide attempt. This large deviation

at

the end of area h embodies the main characteristics of the following area.
Area 5
The

is characterized

by large

content of this area

attempts to prove

at the

is

how much

fluctuations

above and below the mean.

completely on the theme of suicide. She

live. The doctor's queries
with increasing resistance. In the begin-

she now wants to

end of the period meet

ning of the next segment (area 6) she stubbornly refuses to discuss the

subject of suicide further, at which point she changes the subject
abruptly.

�-9Area

7 was

delineated

on

precipitous drop in the

the basis of
TTR,

criteria. It begins with

”two

a

followed by 10 consecutive scores below

rise. Its

the mean, and ends with an equally abrupt

beginning coincides

with a change of subject by the doctor in the form of a question about
her feelings at that

the "you-me" relationship,
period ends
Area

9

when she

in the interview. This content area, 1.6.

moment

is

at

a very

It

The

of an extremely low score enclosed by two

coincides with a brief mention of a meeting with

a young man who told her how well she looked.

remark and her statement
These examples

repetitive level.

abruptly changes the subject.

is delineated because

large deviations.

pursued

"I decided to get

illustrate areas

him

It

ends with an embarrassed

off the topic."

of disturbance or disequilibrium in

the verbal interaction pattern. In contrast, areas

I

3, 6,,23 and 10 are

areas of relative stability or equilibrium in the record. These stable
areas are marked by a different quality of communication. They consist

either of a euphoric,

hypomanic monologue which avoids

all stressful areas.

or of evasion of the doctor's probing questions by superficial rational-

ization and conventional cliches.
Comment:

Recent reports of objective interview studies using other techniques

(10), have noted that the interaction goes through a series of definable
phases, which

may

and successful defense
and the events
The

stressful disorganization

correspond to periods of

respectively.

The

phases demonstrated here,

that delineate them, suggest

an analogous fonmulation.

content areas that disturbed the pattern in this final interview

�also did so

the

initial

interview seven months earlier. we
anticipate that the discussion of a subject that had resulted in disequilibrium but now no longer does so, may constitute an operational
on

definition of "resolution of an area of conflict."

�Discussion and Conclusions:
Diverse and highly personal interpretations of interview data limit

the growth of psychiatry as a science. Systematic study of the actual

transactions

may

lead to operational definitions of hitherto subjective

it is

likely that the patterns of verbal
diversification presented here constitute part of the subliminal cues to

phenomena.

For example,

therapists
affect, etc.

which

reSpond when.making

clinical

judgments of anxiety,

Objective investigations of the interview must encompass the behavior
of both participants since the events observed are interpersonal processes.

Gill,

Heuman &amp;

Redlich (h) define even the

initial interview

as "the

diagnostic evaluation of an interpersonal relationship." Reusch (13)
has recently stated
have the

that “observations

made

in social situations

characteristics of a scientific procedure in which

do

not

one aSpect

is studied in detail while all other variables are held constant."
The method presented here is an attempt to convert these concepts
into practical research methodology.

It

permits a quantitative statement

of various clinical phenomena occurring either within single interviews
or in the course of therapy. Disturbances of verbal interaction are

defined operationally in terms of the configuration of the

Applications to the definition of clinical change and

pattern.
transactions
TTR

within the interview have been presented.
The TTR

is

only one of many quantifiable aspects of dyadic speech.

interaction, time reference, and relative amounts of participation
doctor and patient may also be measured. Further applications of these

Pace of
by

techniques are under investigation.

�REFERENCES

1. Auld, F.

and Murray,

E.J. (1955): Content-Analysis Studies of

Psychotherapy, Pslchol. Bull. 2a: 377-395.

2. Coleman, R., Greenblatt,

and Solomon, H.C. (1956): Physiological

M.

Evidence of Rapport During Psychotherapeutic Interviews,
Dis . Nerv.

3. Eldred, S.H.,

sttem,

ll:

2-8.
E.R., Salzman, L., Meyersburg,

Hamburg, D.A., IHWOOd,

(l95h):

H.A. and Goodrich, G.

A

Procedure for the Systematic

Analysis of Psychotherapeutic Interviews, §§zchiatry, l1:
337-3h5.

h. Gill,

M., Néwman, R. and Redlich, F.C. (l95b): The

in szchiatric Practice.
Press.
5. Goldman-Eisler, F. (195h):

A

New

York:

Study of Individual Differences and of

Interaction in the Behavior of
Interviews, Jour.. Rent. Sci.
6.

Initial_1ntervigg
International Universities

Some

Aspects of Language in

lQQ: 177-197.

Gottschalk, L.A., Gleser, G.C. and Hambidge,
Behavior Analysis, Arch. Neur. and

G.

(1957): Verbal

ngchiat.,

21; 300-311.

7. Grinker, R.R., Sabshin, M., HaMburg, D.A., Board, F.A., Basowitz, H.,
Korchin,
Use

m?

S.J.,

Persky, H. and Chevalier, J.A. (1957): The

an Anxiety-Producing Interview and

Its

Meaning to the

Subject, Arch. Neur. and Psvchiat., 11: hO6-hl9.
8.

daffe, J.: Language of the Dyad:

A

Method of

Interaction Analysis

in PBychiatric Interviews, Psvchiat , (in press).
9. Lorenz, M. and Cobb, S. (195h): Language Patterns in PBychotic

and

Psychoneurotic Subjects, Arch. Neur. and Pszchiat., 1g: 665-673.

�REFEREEIJCES

lO. Mahl, G.F., (1956): Disturbances and Silences in the Patient's
Speech in Psychotherapy, Jour. Abnorm. Soc. Psxcholu

§_3__:

1-15.

11. Handler,

G. and

Kaplan,

:‘J.K.

(1956): Subjective Evaluation and Re-

enforcing Effect of a Verbal Stimulus, Science,

l2.

Mowrer, O.H. (1953): Verbal Behavior

(Ed.) szchotheragz:

T1139

1.2143

in Paychotherapy. In

582-583.
Mowrer

and Research, New York: Ronald

Press.
13. Ruesch, J. (1957): Disturbed Commnication,

New

York:

11.14".

Norton.

1h. Saslow, G., Matarozzo, J.D. and Guze, S.B. (1955): The Stability of

Interaction Chronograph Patterns in Psychiatric Interviews,
Jour. Consult. P§Xcholu

1.2: 14174430.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67424">
                <text>Joseph Jaffe: An Object Study of Communication in Psychiatric Interviews, 1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67425">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67426">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-8-009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67427">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67428">
                <text>Jaffe, Joseph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67429">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67430">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67431">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67432">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67433">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80945">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87506">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94067">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100628">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="276" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="67">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0a04fd8af8c99e319cfc9e14d05f3ffd.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d38bf0d44fbbfe5439d4cca003bd77b2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100693">
                    <text>CHANGES IN VERBAL TRANSACTIONS WITH
INDUCED ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION

JOSEPH JAFFE, M.D., MAX FINK, MD.

Reprinted from Tm: JOURNAL or

AND

ROBERT L. KAHN, PHJ).

NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
130, No. 3, March 1960

Volume
Printed in U.S.A.

�Reprinted from THE

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Volume 130, No. 3, March 1960

Printed in U.S.A.

CHANGES IN VERBAL TRANSACTIONS WITH
INDUCED ALTERED BRAIN FUNCTION
JOSEPH JAFFE, M.D.,1 MAX FINK, MD.

Repeated interviews with patients under—
going convulsive therapy reveal progressive
changes in the interpersonal relationship,
which are referable to verbal and non-verbal transactions. While non-verbal aspects
of communication are difﬁcult to quantify,
techniques are available for the measure—
ment of verbal behavior. Using such lin—
guistic methods, we have observed systematic alterations in language patterns during
convulsive therapy, which were related to
independent evaluations of behavioral
change and to improvement. The description
of these language patterns has provided a
useful quantitative method for understand—
ing interpersonal changes which occur during therapy.
In a syntactic—content analysis of recorded interviews during convulsive therapy
(6), such changes as denial (negation),
qualiﬁcation (subjunctive and .adverbial
modiﬁers), displacement (person and tense),
and cryptic and clichéd remarks were
scored. An increased incidence of these
changes in the patients’ speech was related
both to the degree of induced altered brain
function and to the evaluation of therapeutic response.
It has been clinically observed that when
the language of the patient is affected by
neurologic dysfunction, modiﬁcation of the
interviewer’s speech patterns occur. In the
syntactic-content analyses, in which a structured interview was used, the examiner’s
participation was restricted to statements in
the questionnaire. This two-person inter—
1Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New York.
This study was aided by grants 56-151, Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry, and M-927
of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. S.
Public Health Service. The technical assistance of
Mrs. Jean Kolodny and Mrs. Ann Horowitz is
gratefully acknowledged.
235

AND

ROBERT L. KAHN, PHD.

view group (or dyad) therefore assumed
special characteristics. Interactive effects
were minimized. The constraint of the questionnaire interrupted the reciprocal modiﬁcation of the examiner’s speech. In such a
dyad, scoring of the patient’s responses
alone constituted an adequate description
of changes in the verbal transactions of the
two-person communication system.
Judgements as to mental status are usually arrived at in less structured conversa—
tions between doctor and patient. It was
suggested that measurable changes in language patterns would occur even in con~
ventional clinical interviews, and furthermore that such changes would be related to
those observed in structured interviews.
The methods of dyadic analysis were developed (3—5) to permit a quantitative
description of verbal transactions in unstructured interviews (diagnostic, psycho—
therapeutic). In this analysis, the speech of
doctor and patient is considered as one continuous behavior, and the measurements
are performed on consecutive units, irrespective of speaker. The verbal ﬂow of the
interview is thus considered as a single out—
put, irrespective of speaker. The justiﬁcation for this maneuver rests ultimately on
the correlation of dyadic speech patterns
with those obtained by other methods, and
is an aim of the present study.
These scoring measures of unstructured
interviews have been applied to weekly interviews with patients undergoing convul—
sive therapy. It is the purpose of this report
to 1) determine the pattern of change in
dyadic language measures with convulsive
therapy; 2) study the relation of these
measures to the degree of induced altered
cerebral function; and 3) relate the dyadic
scores to syntactic language measures ob-

�236

JAFFE, FINK AND KAHN

tained concurrently in structured inter-

repetitive the interaction. For these studies,
both the mean and standard deviation of
views.
the TTR distribution of each interview sam—
SUBJECTS AND METHOD
ple was obtained.
For the syntactic speech analyses the paTwenty-seven consecutive referrals for
convulsive therapy in a voluntary mental tient was seen by another examiner during
hospital were studied. On a random basis, the same intervals. This interview consisted
ten patients were assigned to a control group of a standardized questionnaire composed
and the remaining seventeen constituted the of speciﬁc items concerning the major comexperimental group. Both groups were com— plaint, reasons for coming to the hospital,
parable for age and education; the convul- and temporal and spatial orientation (9).
sive group had a mean age of 47 and 11.7 The verbatim responses were analyzed for
mean years of education, while the mean the presence of syntactic language changes
age of the subconvulsive group was 47.8, previously described as occurring with inwith a mean of 10.5 years of education. The duced cerebral dysfunction (6).
Prior to, and at weekly intervals during
investigators had no part in the treatment
process, and did not know which cases treatment, an electroencephalogram was reserved as controls until data collection was corded in each patient. These records were
measured for the per cent time of induced
completed.
The experimental (convulsive) group was slow wave activity (1).
In the dyadic TTR analyses, experimengiven grand mal electro-convulsive therapy
three times weekly, under pentothal pre- tal (convulsive) and control (subconvulmedication for a minimum of 12 treatments. sive) groups were compared. In relating
The control subjects were treated in identi— dyadic TTR changes to induced slow wave
cal fashion except that they received sub- activity and to syntactic language analyses,
convulsive electrostimulation while under the mode of treatment was disregarded, all
pentothal premedication.
patients being considered as a single group.
All patients were interviewed prior to
RESULTS
treatment, and in the week of the 12th
1. Dyadic TTR: A consistent change was
treatment. An unstructured clinical diagnostic interview technique was used centered observed in the TTR patterns of the experiabout the patient’s symptoms and life prob- mental group. Scores for consecutive 25
lems. The patient was encouraged to talk word units of interaction in 500 word samfreely, with occasional guiding interventions ples were plotted before and during the
by the interviewer. Long silences resulted treatment course (end of the fourth week).
in increased interviewer activity. All inter- Figure 1 shows a graph of the TTR patviews were tape—recorded.
terns for one patient. Next to each graph is
For the formal dyadic analyses (3, 5), the frequency distribution of the 20 consecu—
the ﬁrst 500 words of each interview were tive scores shown. The change in the distranscribed in temporal sequence without tribution for this case was a decrease in the
regard to the speaker. This sample of dyadic mean and an increase in the standard deviaspeech was divided into consecutive 25 word tion of the dyadic TTR. This pattern of
units. The type-token ratio (TTR) was cal- change was characteristic of the expericulated for each unit. The type—token ratio mental group.
is the number of different words (types)
Table 1 shows changes in the group mean
divided by the total number of words (to- T TR score during treatment. Although there
kens). Thus, the lower the TTR the more was a decrease in both groups, the change

�237

LANGUAGE CHANGES WITH BRAIN DYSFUNCTION

was signiﬁcant (p &lt; .01) only in the convulsive group and not in the control (sub—
convulsive) group.
Table 2 shows the changes in standard
deviation of the group TTR scores during
treatment. There was a signiﬁcant increase
in standard deviation (p &lt; .01) in the
convulsive group. In the control (subcon—
vulsivc) group the standard deviation was
decreased during treatment. The change,
however, did not reach statistical signiﬁ—
cance.
2. Relation of Dyadic TTR to EEG
changes: The changes in dyadic TTR scores
were related to changes in brain function
as reﬂected in measurements of the amount
of slow wave activity on the electroencephalogram. For this purpose, the per cent time
delta activity in the EEG record obtained
in the same week as the interview was used.
While almost all members of the experimental group developed prominent amounts
of EEG delta activity during treatment,
none of the control group demonstrated
such changes. Using the method of rank
order correlation, the change in standard,
deviation of the dyadic TTR correlated
+65 with the per cent time of delta activity

TABLE 1
Change in Mean TTR with Electroshock

Subconvulsive
Convulsive

.92

j
.xv-rp/w.

p.
l—

.76

.

/.

-

-

with Electroshoclc

Subconvulsive
Convulsive

,5
3

83
°

.5660

,0
.92

El

e4

...76
.68

.60

.

.68

D—URING
TREATMENT

/

f

.76

T”

text).

.92

Lo

55

5“
83
m

Ea

/\T

I

.56/6068

.76

TTR

FIG. 1.

.84

ﬂ—I

6

0

10
17

During Difference
treatment treatment

8.6

8.1

76

9.2

—0.5

+1.6*

*Signiﬁcant at 0.01 level, using Wilcoxon’s
method of paired replicates.
TABLE 3
Relation of Syntactic and Dyadic TTR
Language ZWeasnres

Dyadic Analysis:
Syntactic Analysis

N

Change in

Mean

Fewer
than
two changes
Two or more
changes

Change in

Standard

Dev1at10n

15

—0.8

—0.1

12

—3.0**

+1.4*

&lt; .01). The greater increase in variability in the language measure was thus associated With the greater degrees of altered
brain function. Changes in the mean T TR,
however, were not signiﬁcantly related to
the changes in brain function (r = +19).
3. Relation of Dyadic TTR to Syntactic
Language Changes: A comparison of dyadic
TTR scores with syntactic aspects of the
patient’s speech obtained in independent
structured interviews was made. The patients were divided into those who showed
two or more syntactic language changes,
and those who showed fewer than two such
changes, regardless of the type of treatment (Table 3). For the patients showing
(19

0

N

Group

Pre—

Signiﬁcant at 0.02 level.
** Signiﬁcant at 0.01 level.

0’)

.

—0.8
—2.4*

TABLE 2
Change in Standard Deviation of TTR

25 WORD UNITS)

E2

80.3
79.2

*

————“‘7
/'

17

81.1
81.6

Signiﬁcant at 0.02 level, using Wilcoxon’s
method of paired replicates.

PRE-TREATMENT

1.0

10

treaItirient tiggfﬁiltegnt Difference

*

DYADIC TTR PATTERN
(CONSECUTIVE

N

Group

.84

.92

LIO

Plot of TTR patterns for one patient (see

�238

JAFFE, FINK AND KAHN

two or more syntactic changes, both dyadic
indices showed a signiﬁcant change during
treatment. There were no signiﬁcant altera—
tions in TTR indices for the group showing
fewer than two syntactic changes.
DISCUSSION

These observations indicate a signiﬁcant
difference in dyadic transactions in the experimental (convulsive) and control (subconvulsive) groups—a difference which is
referable to a consistent change in the subjects receiving convulsive therapy. The ﬁnd:
ings are consistent with those reported by
Weinstein and Kahn (9) in their studies of
patients with altered brain function. They
observed increased use of the second and
third person, non-aphasic misnaming, cli—
chés, stereotyped expressions, condensations
and neologisms. These language patterns
were termed the “language of denial” and
were regarded as symbolic adaptations.
Kahn and Fink (6) noted similar language
changes in patients with brain function al—
tered by convulsive therapy. The present
observations indicate that verbal transactions during altered brain function are not
only more stereotyped qualitatively, as in
the use of clichés, but are also more stereotyped quantitatively as in the increased
repetition of words. Thus, analyses of the
more formal aspects of speech parallel
analyses of content.
Alteration in brain function was also related to changes in the dyadic indices. The
low, but signiﬁcant correlation between the
dyadic scores and EEG delta activity suggests that the two-person communication
system as a whole may reﬂect neurophysio—
logical alteration in one of its participants.
The low correlation is consistent with previous observations that the dyadic TTR pattern is sensitive to factors other than al—
tered brain function (5).
Other studies of the dyadic TTR and syntactic language measures during drug administration (2) are consistent with the
present ﬁndings. Administration of agents

which produce EEG hypersynchrony similar to that of convulsive therapy was associated with changes in both language measures in the direction of increased stereotypy
and repetitiveness. Agents which produced
EEG desynchronization, however, were associated with decreased repetitiveness and
a decreased number of syntactic alterations.
These observations, though limited to acute
drug interviews, indicate that similar
changes in language patterns can be antici—
pated in subjects following the chronic administration of psychotropic compounds. We
anticipate that alteration in patterns of lan—
guage may provide cues for the evaluation
of behavioral change in drug therapies as
well as in convulsive therapy.
It is of signiﬁcance that changes in dyadic
speech are measurable when the neurophysiological status of only one of the participants is altered. This observation is consistent with concepts of verbal behavior as
a two-person phenomenon, inseparable from
its interpersonal context (7, 8, 10). The
method and ﬁndings also demonstrate that
neurophysiologic effects can be investigated
in unstructured interviews and that the results may be related directly to those obtained under more structured experimental
conditions. Thus, the measurement of formal aspects of language in clinical interviews may be viewed as another tool of
neurophysiologic investigation.
CONCLUSION

Formal language measures in unstruc—
tured clinical interviews were undertaken
in the course of a study of convulsive and
subconvulsive therapies in a hospitalized
psychiatric population.
Dyadic TTR (Type—Token-Ratio) measures showed a signiﬁcant decrease in the
mean and an increase in the standard deviation in the subjects receiving convulsive
therapy, but no differences in those receiv—
ing subconvulsive therapy. The degree of
change in dyadic indices was related both
to the degree of induced delta activity on

�LANGUAGE CHANGES WITH BRAIN DYSFUNCTION

the electroencephalogram, and to changes
in syntactic language patterns obtained in
independent structured interviews.
Theoretic implications for the understanding of language changes during altered
brain function were discussed.
1.

REFERENCES
FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Relation of EEG
delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock. AMA. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.,
78: 516—525, 1957.

J. AND KAI-IN, R. L. Drug induced changes in interview patterns: Linguistic and neurophysiologic indices. In The Dynamics of Psychiatric Drug Therapy, SarwerFoner, G., ed. C. C Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill.

2. FINK, M., JAFFE,

3.

In press.
JAFFE, J. An objective study of communication
in psychiatric interviews. J. Hillside Hosp.,
6: 207—215,1957.

239

J. Dyadic analysis of two psychoanalytic
interviews. Presented in Symposium on Psycholinguistic Analysis of the Psychiatric Interview, Divisional Meeting of A.P.A., New
York City, November 28, 1959.
JAFFE, J. Language of the dyad. Psychiatry, 21:

4. JAFFE,

.

249—258, 1958.

.

.

KAHN, R. L.

AND

FINK, M. Changes in language

during electroshock. In Psychopathology of
Communication, Hoch, P. and Zubin, J ., eds.,
Grune &amp; Stratton, New York, 1958.
SAPIR, E. Language: An Introduction to the
Study of Speech. Harcourt-Brace, New York,
1949.

.SKINNER, B. F. Verbal Behavior. Appleton—
Century-Crofts, New York, 1957.
. WEINSTEIN, E. A. AND KAHN, R. L. Denial of
10.

Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects.
C. C Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill., 1955.
ZIPF, G. K. Human Behavior and the Principle
of Least Eﬁort. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge,
Mass, 1949.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2754">
                <text>Changes in verbal transactions with induced altered brain function. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1960 Mar; 130:235-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2755">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2756">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-44-010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2757">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2758">
                <text>Jaffe, Joseph; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2759">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2760">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2761">
                <text>Reprinted from The JOURNAL of NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Volume 130, No. 3, March 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2762">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2763">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74478">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81039">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87600">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94161">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="252" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="43">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/31ade8ace56aaea325e0c1b5774137fb.pdf</src>
        <authentication>34c1dccec8167a1f1d6a23f225341ecc</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100669">
                    <text>F

,

Perception of

Eknbedded

Figures after Induced

Cerebral Trauma

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. and

Max

Fink,

M.D.

1/?

"a

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

M—927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service.

Aided by grant

Presented
11—27-57

at

American Psychological Association, New York, August, 1957.

NJ.

�Perception of

Embedded

Figures after Induced

Cerebral.Trauma

Studies of complex visual perception
man

are not always clear or consistent.

after cerebral
The

damage

in

disagreements may be due,

in part, to difficulties in evaluating the extent of the disease process
or the degree of alteration in cerebral function. In contrast, conditions
in'Which there is control of the degree of brain damage, as in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), provide a unique opportunity

for studying this

problem.
While investigations of brain-injured populations have focused an

the role of location of lesion on behavior, current studies of
emphasized the
been shown

to

EDT.

have

factor of individual differences. marked.variability has

for perceptual (l), behavioral (2)

and physiological reSPonses

In addition, various personality (h) and social factors (5) have

1.

C. Landis, D. Dillon and S. Leopold, Changes

2.

M.

3.

R.L. Kahn,

'

ECT

in flicker-fusion

threShold are in choice reaction time induced by electroconvulsive
therapy, J. Psychol., bl, 1956, 61-80.

Fink, R.L. Kahn and M. A. Green, Experimental studies of the
Electroshock process, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. (in press).
M. Fink and E.A. weinstein, Relation of amobarbital test
to clinical improvement in electroshock, A.M.A. Arab. Neurol. &amp;

PWChiato, 76’ 1956, 23-29;

Fink and R.L. Kahn, Relation of

EEG delta activity to behavioral
in
electroshock; quantitative serial studies, A.M.A. Arch.
response

M.

Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. 78, 1957, 516-525.

h.

R. L. Kahn and M. Fink, Personality

5.

R. L. Kahn, M. Pollack ahd

factors in behavioral response

to Electroshock, Conf. Neural. in press).

F. Fink, Social factors in.the selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, J. Hillside Hosp., 6,

1957, 216-228.

�-2been related to differences

In the course of

an

in reSponse to treatment.

investigation of the perceptual

and behavioral

changes with ECT, a convulsive-subconvulsive control study was undertaken.

In this report, performance

on complex

visual tasks is presented.

Specific-

ally, the aim.was to determine whether perceptual change induced by ECT
is related to the degree of altered brain function and clinical behavioral
change; and whether the pretreatment perceptual pattern was related to

physiologic changes with treatment.
The method used

in the study

was the perception of embedded geometric

figures - a technique which has been Widely
studies of perceptual changes

accompanying

in recent years in
cerebral dysfunction (6).
employed

Lethe:
1) Population:
were
22

Fifty-three consecutive patients referred for

studied. These included

16 men and 37 women, with ages ranging_fran

to 66 with a median of h9 years.

into

ECT

The

patients

two groups. An experimental group of 29

were divided

at

patients (Convulsive

random
A)

received grand.mal electrotherapy with pentothal premedication three times
a week, using
C—h?

either a Medcraft alternating current instrument or a Reiter

electrostimulator.

A

minimum of 12

treatments were given.

of treatments was determined by the supervising

The number

psychiatrist in charge of

clinical criteria. A control group of
treated in similar faShion, except that only subconvulsive

the treatment unit on the basis of
2h

6.

patients

was

5. Battersby, H.P. Krieger, M. Pollack and M. B. Bender, Figure
ground discrimination and the "abstract attitude" in patients with
cerebral neoplasms, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76, 1956, 369-379;
H. L. Teuber and S. Weinstein, Ability to discover hidden figures
after cerebral lesions, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 763 1956,
369-379; F. Pollack, W.S. Battereby and M. B. Bender, Figure-ground
discrimination in patients with cerebral tumor, presented at Eastern
Psychological Association, 1957.

W.

�"1

-3stimulation was given following the pentothal. Fourteen patients in the
control group

were subsequently given a

regular course of convulsive

therapy (Convulsive B).
2)

Perceptual task: In the week prior to treatment and on the

day following the 12th treatment each

patient was tested with a modifica-

tion of Gottschaldt's hidden figures developed
The

by Battersby

subject is presented with a page containing

geometric

figure,

figure is

embedded

it

and below

(fig. 1).

-a

simple

a complex figure in which the simple
The

patient is asked to trace a Specific
by

geometric figure from the background/outlining
~The

two fonns

gt 2;.(7).

it with a

colored pencil.

discriminations ranged in complexity from relatively simple to more

complex. There were 25 such discriminations.
was allowed

for each. Performance

of errors.

To minimize a

was

A

maximum of two minutes

scored in terms of total number

practice effect

two

equivalent forms of the test

were used.
3)

Evaluation of physiologic change:

Two

the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital

tests of brain function -

test

(8)

-

were given to

at weekly intervals during treatment.

each

patient prior to,

7.

Battersby, Krieger, Pollack and Bender, op.

8.

E. A. weinstein, R.L. Kahn, L.A. Sugarman and L. Linn, Diagnostic
use of amobarbital sodium ("amytal sodium") in organic brain
disease, Am. J. Peychiat., 112, 1953, 889-89h.

and

cit.,

The

703-712.

�.uelectroencephalogram was evaluated as to the degree of delta activity
induced according

to criteria previously published (9)°

’The

amobarbital

test for brain disease was noted as positive or negative according to the
standardized criteria (10). The results of these tests obtained during
the second, third and fourth weeks of treaunent furnished the criteria
for physiological change.

A

combined physiological index was obtained

by ascribing to each high degree delta

barbital test a score of one.
ranged from zero to six.
h)

EEG

record and each positive amo-

The range of

Behavior ratings: Each

physiological alteration thus

patient's behavior

was

evaluated

at

weekly

intervals. After the 12th treatment, a rating for the degree of behavioral
change was made according to

»..none.

These

ratings of

four classes: marked, moderate,

change were

minimal or

not value judgments as to the quality

of change, but rather quantitative estimates of differences in behavior

patterns under similar conditions of observation.
vpatterns as euphoria, paranoia or withdrawal might

[Thus such behavior

all

be

rated as equivalent

degrees of quantitative change, although the implications of each for qual-

itative evaluation of

9.
10.

improvement were

Fink and Kahn, op.

cit.,

quite different.

éin~pressl. 37$-5§ﬁn.

'Weinstein, Kahn, Sugarman and Linn, op.

cit.,

889-89h.

�Results:
pre-treatment and treatment scores

The

number of

errors with treatment is

intragroup analysis

shows

shown

and the mean change

for

each group

that the subconvulsive group

in the

in Table I.

made

The

significantly

fewer errors during treatment, while the combined convulsive patients made

significantly more.
TABLE

I

Intragroup Comparisons for

Number

Before and During

ECT

Mean No.

Type of Treatment

Subconvulsive
Convulsive

A

Convulsive

B

Before

E}

ECT

of Errors

Errors
During

EDT

Difference p_*

2h

9.96

7.67

-2.29

4:1.02

29

10.59

12.62

+2.03

NS

7.36

10.1h

+2.79

‘=1.05

+2.28

“=1.02

**

1h

Combined Convulsive

h3

‘

* Intragroup analyses in this and subsequent tables based on
Wilcoxon's method of paired replicates.
** Patients originally in control group, then placed on convulsive

treatment.

group

is

period.

The score obtained during treatment

used here as the pretreatment score

Prior to treatment. subcgnvulsive patients

made

in the control

for the convulsive
approximately the

same

number of

errors as the original convulsive group. During treatment, however, subconvulsive subjects made fewer errors (7.67), while the errors in
convulsive patients increased to 12.62 errors - a difference significant

at better than the

1%

level of confidence.

�-6When

the data is analyzed with respeCt to physiologic change, significant

increases in errors are found only in those patients with the greater
degrees of physiologic change. This relationship is present in analysis
of the amobarbital

tests are

test

and the

combined (Table

EEG

as separate indices, and when the two

II).
TABLE

II

Intragroup Comparisons for Number of Errors Before and After
ECT in Relation to Degree of Physiological Change
.

Physiological Index

N

Mean Difference in Number of
Errors during Treatment

Amobarbital Test.

or

None

positive

one

13

-O.23

NS

28

+3.714

.01

23

+1.73

NS

18

+3.33

.05

3

21

+1.00

h to 6

us

20

+3.90

.01

Two

or three

positive

Electroencephalogram

or

None

one

High Delta
Two

or three

High Delta

.

.

Combined Physiological
0

to
The

in

relationship between

number of

ﬂue degree

errors during treatment is

of behavioral change
shown

with no, minimal or moderate behavior changes

difference in
made

number of

errors.

in Table

III.

do not show an

and the change

Those

patients

appreciable

Those with marked behavior changes, however,

significantly more errors during treatment.

�TABLE

III

Intragroup Comparisons for Number of Errors Before and During
ECT in Relation to Degree of Behavioral Change
Degree of Behavioral Change

Difference Nnmber
Errors During Treatment

Mean

N

_
marked

2h

Moderate

1h

p

&lt;1.0l

+3.58

+1.00

NS

-0.h0

NS

l

Minimal

or

5

None

Analysis of the pretreatment error scores in relation to the degree
of physiological change

is

shown

in Table

IV.

The

results

show

that subjects

with large pretreatment error scores manifest greater degrees of physiolog-

ical

change during treatment.

Patients with

little physiological

change

during convulsive therapy had a mean pretreatment score of 7.88, while

physiological effects,

had a mean pretreatment

score of 13.25 errors. The triserial correlation
the .05 level of confidence.

is +.3h, significant at

those

who developed marked

TABLE

IV

Relation of Pretreatment errors to Eventual Degree of Physiological
Change During Treatment
N

Mean Number

Errors Prestreatment

Physiologic Change:
o

to

211’

3/ and

my

16

7.88

19

11.21

�Qualitative Data:
Alterations in size of figure or in

minor aspects of form were common

types of error during both testing periods. Certain qualitative patterns
were

frequently noted during treatment,

however, which occurred only

or to a lesser extent in the pretreatment period.

patients to
.was

make no

It

was common

attempt to trace the more complex figures.

rarely

for
This response

often associated with a generalized withdrawal reaction in which the

patient

was unreSponsive to any stimulus or procedure.

Others became

hostile and negativistic toward the testing.

l

i

Patients

wiﬂn

the greatest

amount of physiological change seemed to

difficulty following instructions. They would trace the lines indiscriminately without regard for the Specific figure to be outlined, repeated

have
‘

a previous figure despite changes in the

actually existed,
the

more complex

and impulsively, and showed

Such

little

drew

lines

where none

trace the stimulus figure while ignoring

and attempted to

test figure.

test figure,

patients were likely to respond quickly

concern about making an error even

they might spontaneously comment, "I

know

that's

not

right."

when
‘

�Discussion:

results of this study clearly danonstrate a relationship between
the degree of cerebral dysfunction and perceptual alteration. Patients
‘The

with subconvulsive stimulation

make fewer

errors

on

retesting.

A

slight

decrease or no change in errors occurred in those patients receiving
vulsive therapy

who showed

only minimal physiological changes.

vulsive patients, however, with the
showed a

significant increase in

alteration,
of errors. This interrelation-

number

is in

accord with studies of patients

with altered brain function due to head injury and brain tumor.

(ll),

The con-

most marked physiological

ship of brain fUnction and perception
and Weinstein

con—

Teuber

applying a similar technique in cases with penetrating

’brain,wounds, concluded that performance was unrelated to locus of lesion
but that aphasic patients

made

significantly more errors than a non-

aphasic brain-injured group.

Pollack gt §l3(12), using the identical

in this study, reported

relationship between perceptual errors

as

no

test
and

the location of lesion in tumor patients. They reported, instead, that

defective perception

related to the severity of other rental changes,

was

‘

such as

It

disorientation.
Should'be pointed out that the

all patients referred for
to that found by Pollack

ECT

was 10.35

total pretreatment

cit.,

Teuber and Weinstein, op.

12.

Pbllack, Battersby and Bender, op.

13.

Ibid.

score for

errors, a score almost identical

gt §l5(13) in theﬁ‘brain

11.

mean

369-379.

cit.

tumor

patients. Since

�the two populations are comparable in terms of other parameters as age
The

and education.

defects in figure ground discrimination cannot

be

’regarded as reflective of cerebral dysfunction as an isolated entity

abstracted from the totality of behavior. Rather than being in a
to one relationship, poor performance on such tasks

interaction of

many

there are

cases with cerebral

many

may

be due

to the

factors, brain dysfunction; being only one.
not

damage who do

show

one

Thus

defects.

Con-

versely, the present findings indicate that the inability to perceive
embedded

as

it is
The

figures

may be

related as

much

to certain types of mental illness

to brain disease.

!

relationship of perceptual alteration to behavioral

is clearly demonstrated.

treatment

The

patients

increase in errors during treatment were those
pronounced change

in clinical behavior.

who showed

also

who

change during

the greatest

showed

the most

They manifested such behavior

patterns as euphoria, hypomania, withdrawal, somatization or paranoia.
Comparable to these are the
embedded

figures test during treatment.

related to
paranoid
was

qualitative aspects of performance

an evasion

The

some

may

as well be

was

cases, and to a

lack of concern in correcting errors

associated with clinical patterns of euphoria

increase in errors

the

Failure to attempt the task

or withdrawal reaction in

hostility in orders.

on

attributed to

and hypomania.

change

The

in motivation or

attitude toward the task or examiner as it is to any Specific aSpect of
the altered brain function. Changes in performance on this complex perceptual task can thus be understood as

one

manifestation of changes in

the patterns of interaction with the environment.
The

relation between behavioral

this type of task, has been noted

and perceptual

by Witkin to be

patterns, using

true of persons without

9

�-11..

demonstrable cerebral dysfunction as well.

He

individual differences in the perception of

embedded

be

related to personality factors (15).

The

found

that the

wide

figures (1h)

may

finding in the present

study of the prognostic significance of the pretreatment score to the

eventual physiological reaponse is in accord with his observations.
7

Personality factors

may

thus be related to the degree of changes in
In a previous study (16) certain person-

brain function.with trauma.

ality patterns

were associated with the

ment following ECT.

short term behavioral improve-

basic characteristics of persons with a
favorable prognosis defined in that study were an inability to think

critically

The

or sensitively about

their

own

or other's needs or feelings,

patterns characterized by oversimplified generalizations,
,stereotypy and conventionality. The present data that persons with
greater difficulty in making the necessary analysis and figure-ground
and response

discriminations

on embedded

figures

show a

greater alteration in behavior

with treatment, is consistent with the previous observations.

Witkin,.Individual differences in case of perception of
figures, J. Pers., 19: 1950, 1-15.
15. H. A. Witkin, Nature and importance of individual differences
in perception, J. Pers., 18, l9h9, 1&amp;5-170.
1h.

16.

H. A.

embedded

Kahn and Fink, op.

cit.

�.12Summary and Conclusion:

1. Fifty-three consecutive patients referred for electrotherapy
were studied before and
embedded geometric

after treatment

figures.

An

on

their ability to perceive

experimental group of

29

patients

received

A.
regular grand mal therapy wiﬂa pentothal premedication.
control group of 2h patients received subconvulsive stimulation only.

2.

The

experimental group

made

significantly more errors following

treatment than did the controls.
I

3. 'Within the experimental group, however, there was considerable
I

variability. Increase in errors

was found

to

be

significantly related

to the degree of altered brain function, and the degree of behavioral
change.

h.

The

pretreatment error scores were significantly related to the

degree of altered brain function developed during treatment. The significance

in terms of personality factors is indicated.
5. Performance in this complex visual task mirrors the pattern of

of this

behavioral change observed clinically.
6.
one

It is

concluded

that performance

on a complex

visual task is

manifestation of a generalized pattern of interaction with the environ-

ment.

,4
Lu...

�.13-

Legend

Illustrations of test figures.

Fig. 1.

used to acquaint the subjects with the task
the task

is

The

is

preliminary sample
shown

in a. In

d

complicated by having the subject determine which of

the two simple figures can be found in the complex figure.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2514">
                <text>Perception of embedded figures after induced altered brain function. American Psychologist, 12: 36, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2515">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2516">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-24-029</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2517">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2518">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2519">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2520">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2521">
                <text>[preprint].</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2522">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2523">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74454">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81015">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87576">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94137">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="255" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="46">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/7bd07b6cfa28408a13dfb7a2b134ee43.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7a8e9dcb7ef041dbb63226e8de460992</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100672">
                    <text>�Reprinted from Psychopathology of Communication
Grime &amp; Strstton. Inc., 1958
Printed in. (1.5.4.

9
CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING
ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY
By ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,

I

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.*

Weinstein and his associates have described patterns
of symbolic adaptation in patients with cerebral dysfunction.l The
main emphasis in their work has been placed on altered language patterns. Their observations have shown the similarity and relationship
between various kinds of behavior which were previously regarded as
disparate phenomena. Instead of being isolated defects due to focal
brain lesions, these phenomena can be understood as uniﬁed aspects of
an altered pattern of adaptation under the conditions of a diffuse disturbance in brain function. Some of the factors which determine the particular type of adaptation shown include the premorbid personality and the
nature of the environmental stresses.
This emphasis on language has been shown to be a useful method of
study. For example, the presence of certain characteristic changes in
language under the influence of amobarbital sodium, such as disorienta—
tion for time and place, denial of illness, and reduplication, has been
standardized as a diagnostic test of brain disease in neurological patients?! 3
This technique has application in the study of other conditions of
altered brain function, as in the somatic therapies. The electroshock
population is of interest for two reasons. It is possible in these patients,
as it is not in those with neurological diseases, to manipulate experimentally the stimulus causing changes in brain function. Secondly, the mode
of action and the psychological changes associated with electroshock
treatment remain poorly understood. In a previous study we have shown
that a favorable clinical response to electroshock treatment is related to
early and persistent manifestations of language changes with amobarbiN RECENT YEARS

*

Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New
York. Prepared with assistance from the National Institute of Mental Health, Public Health Service and the Dazian Foundation for Medical Research.

126

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

127

tal sodium characteristic of altered brain function} This ﬁnding was
considered to support the hypothesis advanced by Weinstein and
Kahnl’ 5 that the mechanism of therapeutic action of electrically induced convulsions lay in the creation of a condition of altered brain
function in which the patient might express his problems in a new
symbolic fashion, particularly in the form of denial.
The present investigation is a further attempt to test this hypothesis
by studying changes in language that occur with treatment. The following questions speciﬁcally were studied:
1. Are there characteristic identiﬁable changes in language which develop in the course of electroshock treatment?
2. Are these changes related to the clinical response?
3. Are these changes related to the degree of alteration of brain function?
4. Does the administration of amobarbital sodium prior to treatment
produce any changes in language which have prognostic value for the
eventual clinical response to treatment, the development of altered brain
function, and the development of language changes during treatment?
METHOD

Population: Sixty-ﬁve consecutive referrals for electroshock treatment
at the Hillside Hospital were studied. The Reiter electrostimulator was
used on 49 patients, while 16 were treated with the Medcraft. There were
20 men in the series and 45 women and ages ranged from 21 to 68.
Each patient was tested prior to treatment and retested during the
second week of treatment after having received 4-6 convulsions, and during the third week after having received 7-9 convulsions. On each of
these occasions the patient was ﬁrst tested clinically and then after
amobarbital sodium had been administered at the rate of .05 grams per
minute until nystagmus, slurred speech, drowsiness, and errors in counting backward were noted.2
The test consisted of a standardized series of questions concerning
orientation and awareness of illness. This study is based, however, on
the response to only three of the questions used: (1) What is your main
trouble? (2) Why did you come to this place? (3) If you could have
one wish, what would you wish for? All responses were recorded verbatim. Observations were also made on such nonverbal aspects as smiling, laughing, gestures, and other bodily movements.

�128

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

or

COMMUNICATION

RESULTS

Patterns of Language Change Noted Clinically During Treatment
In evaluating the changes in language, the original responses to the
three questions given clinically prior to treatment were used as the baseline. The evaluation of what constituted a change was based on explicit
objective changes in grammar rather than on subjective or interpretative
changes as to affect, mood, feeling, pitch, voice quality, etc. In this
manner the following types of language change were noted clinically
during the course of treatment: (1) alteration in the syntactical use of
person, (2) evasion, (3) verbal denial, (4) qualiﬁcation, (5) change in
tense, (6) displacement, (7) stereotyped expressions and cliches, and
(8) smiling and laughing.
Alteration in the syntactical use of person. Instead of using the ﬁrst
person singular as in the pretreatment period, 28 patients used the second or third person and, occasionally, the ﬁrst person plural. To the
question concerning main trouble such responses were given as, “It’s
what they call a depression,” “They told me I was emotionally and
mentally sick,” “We’re having a lot of trouble with my mother-in-law,”
“My cousin brought me; she said I was nervous,” “What’s your main
trouble, or don’t you know?” and “My Mrs. is sick and I would appreciate it if they would let her in here as soon as possible.” The reason for
coming to the hospital was variously given as, “My wife brought me,”
“My father told me to come here,” or “My doctor said this was a good
hospital.” The wish was given as “Perfect health for my family,” “My
children, my husband, and all my good friends should be healthy and
happy,” and “There should be peace in the world.”
Evasion. Evasion in answering the question about their illness was
shown by 27 patients. This commonly took the form of answering this
question with another, as, “What do you mean by my main trouble?,”
“What do you expect me to say?,” “Well, what it it?,” and “What did I
say last time?” Other language patterns considered evasive included
such responses as, “I don’t know how to tell you,” “I don’t get what you
mean,” “Let me think,” “It’s hard to say,” and “I just don’t know how
to express it.’ One patient asked the examiner to give her a hint.
Verbal denial. Explicit verbal denial of illness was shown by 23 patients. They either said they had no main trouble, were well or else, after
giving evasive ‘I don’t know” responses, denied their illness and symptoms when speciﬁcally questioned about them.

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

129

Qualiﬁcation. Qualiﬁcation of a response in the direction of less commitment was shown by 19 patients. This language pattern was characterized by the use of such words as “guess,” “kind of,” “sort of,” “think,”
“apparently,” “probably,” “possibly,” “might be,” “seem,” “assumed,”
9,
and “perhaps. Thus such responses were given as, “I guess I have
been jittery,” “I seem to be very much depressed,” “Probably that I’m
nervous,” “I suffer from anxieties, apparently,” “Possibly worry about
the future,” “I have sort of gotten frightened,” “Mentally upset, I assume,” and “I think I’m a little insecure.”
Change in tense. In 18 patients there was a change in tense in describing their illness. In most cases the patient used the past tense: “I was
depressed when I came here” or “I had been nervous.” In other cases
the patient answered the question about his main trouble by putting it
in the future tense as a wish.
Displacement. In 20 cases there was a displacement of the complaint
to something other than originally given prior to treatment. This was
invariably less serious than the original complaint. Sometimes the displacement was in the form of a somatic complaint, as saying the main
trouble was “diarrhea,” “headaches,” “pain in the feet,” “I slammed the
ﬁnger in the door,” and “I’ve got an itch.” In other cases the displacement was to some concrete aspect of the hospital situation, as “My main
trouble is getting these treatments,” or “I’m upset because I was transferred to another ward.”
Stereotyped expressions and cliches. The use of stereotyped expressions and cliches was shown by 11 patients. They gave such responses
as “It seems to me under the proper circumstances I’d be all right,” “ [My
trouble is] monetary problems with people that are honorary and sincere,” “That’s the root of the whole thing,” “The only thing certain is
death and taxes,” “Learn my lesson and be a good boy,” “To be a person
of pep and reliability,” and “I just want to stop being a lazy lout.” One
woman responded to a question of her one wish with, “I think I should
consult my husband before I make a wish because he’s a lawyer and the
father of my children.”
Smiling and laughing. In 20 cases the patient was noted to smile or
laugh either immediately preceding or following his response to the
question concerning his illness.
Language Changes Shown with Amobarbital Sodium During Treatment
The language patterns after amobarbital sodium during the second

�130

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

and third weeks of treatment were similar to those noted clinically. With
the drug, however, the changes appeared earlier in the course of treatment. A given language pattern might be noted in the second week of
treatment with the drug, but would not occur clinically until the third
week. In addition, the reactions to the drug took more extreme forms,
which are described as (l) cryptic responses, and (2) withdrawal reactions.
Cryptic responses. These were shown by 23 patients. Responses were
classed as cryptic when they had no obvious relevance to the test question or when their meaning was obscure, representing a very personalized expression. Thus one patient, when asked his main trouble, said,
“Nightmare of the afternoon of the evening of the nightmare.” Others
do
the
know
the
didn’t
“I
such
problems—couldn’t
as
responses
gave
problems,” “Getting my husband to write down what he does,” or “What
could I say—you don’t get the crossword.”
Withdrawal reactions. Some pattern of withdrawal was noted in 33
patients. This behavior was characterized by incomplete sentences, incoherent mumbling, neologisms, perseveration, the use of a foreign
language by bilingual patients, and delay or failure to respond to the
questions. These patients would characteristically lie with their eyes
open, would smile or turn their heads when the examiner spoke, and
would speak clearly and promptly and in English when asked questions
not pertaining to their illness.
Other Changes in Language
Other changes in language were noted both clinically and with amobarbital sodium in response to the other questions of the test battery but
not as a part of this study. There was frequent misnaming of the examiner or reference to him as “Mister.” With the drug those patients
who had a “positive reaction,” i.e., one characteristic of altered brain
function, showed the characteristic patterns of disorientation for place
and time and confabulation described in previous communications. (2)
Relation of Language Changes to Clinical Response
The evaluation of clinical response to treatment was made independently of this study. The patients were rated by the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the treatments, by the patient’s own therapist and supervising psychiatrist, and by the medical director. On the basis of these
ratings the patients were classiﬁed into three groups: 28 patients were

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

13].

considered much improved, no longer showing the symptoms which had
brought them into the hospital; 22 patients were rated as moderately
improved, showing some symptomatic relief but still showing disturbing
features; and 15 were regarded as unimproved, having shown only
equivocal or transient changes at best. The ratings were short term
evaluations, being made within two months after completion of treatment.
For quantitative purposes the language changes shown during both
the second and third weeks of treatment have been grouped together as
though the patients had been tested only once. If a particular pattern
was shown during both periods, the item was scored only once. Altogether, 89 per cent of the patients showed at least one of these patterns of
language change clinically during treatment. Such changes were found
in all of the much improved patients but in only 73 per cent of the unimproved group. It was apparent that there was a relation between the
degree of clinical improvement and the number of changes in language
patterns. When the data are analyzed for the patients who showed three
or more language pattern changes, there is a signiﬁcant difference between the groups (table 1). While 68 per cent of the much improved
patients showed three or more language changes, only 20 per cent of
the unimproved patients showed this degree of language change. Using
Chi-square, the over-all difference is signiﬁcant at better than the 1 per
cent level of conﬁdence.
TABLE

1.—Relation of Language Changes Shown Clinically to Response to

Treatment

Three or more
*
patterns

Fewer than three

Change

No.

Much improved
Moderately
improved
Unimproved

28

19

22

7

32

15

68

15

3

20

12

80

65

29

45 per cent

36

55 per cent

Total

*X’

=

11.26; P

&lt;

68 per cent

patterns
9

*

32 per cent

.01

When each language pattern is analyzed individually (as shown in
fig. 1) it becomes apparent that not all patterns discriminated equally

�132

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

between the groups. In all but one case, a greater percentage of the
much improved group was most likely to show denial, use of the second
or third person, evasion, and displacement of complaint. The only lanmuch
the
between
found
diﬁerence
which
little
was
on
pattern
guage
improved and unimproved patients was the incidence of smiling and

laughing.
Analysis of the changes shown by the diﬁerent groups under amytal is
shown for the cryptic and withdrawal reactions only in ﬁgure 1. While
the crytic responses did not vary much with the different groups, the
showing of a withdrawal reaction differentiated the three groups signiﬁcantlyﬁ‘ occurring in 71 per cent of the much improved, 45 per cent of
the moderately improved, and only 20 per cent of the unimproved patients.
Relation of Language Changes to Electroencephalographic Response
In a previous communication a method of quantitatively evaluating
electroencephalographic records was described.6 Criteoria were established for rating records as showing relatively high, middle or low degree of slowing according to ﬁve criteria: average per cent time delta
waves (waves of six or fewer cycles per second), the highest per cent time
delta waves at any one lead, the lowest frequency in the record, the
highest amplitude of delta waves, and the longest duration of a burst
of delta waves. In the present study, an electroencephalogram was obtained prior to treatment and in the second and third weeks of treatment.
Each record was evaluated according to the dichotomy of showing a
relatively high degree of delta activity or not, using these criteria.
In table 2 the relationship is shown between electroencephalographic
slowing and changes in language. Those patients with the highest
degree of cerebral dysfunction, having high degree delta in both the
second and third weeks of treatment, show a greater number of language
changes both clinically and with amobarbital sodium. Using the withdrawal reaction as an index of the drug effect, however, the difference
just fails to be statistically signiﬁcant.

Pretreatment Language Patterns
The language patterns described in this study were considered as
changes only when they occurred after the original pretreatment clinical
test which was used as a baseline. Seven patients, however, showed some
"

X2

=

10.72, signiﬁcant at better than the 1 per cent level of conﬁdence.

�133

CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY
TABLE

2.—Relation of Language Change to High Degree Delta on the Electroencephalogram During the Second and Third Weeks of Treatment

Withdrawal reactions
with amobarhital
sodium T

Change

No.

Three or more
changes clinically

Both weeks
high
Delta
Activity
One week
high
Delta
Activity
No high
Delta
Activity

25

16

16

8

50

9

56

24

6

25

8

33

= 7.62; P &lt;
TX” = 4.87; P &lt;
* X2

*

64 per cent

15

60 per cent

.05
.10

M

form of these language patterns in the initial clinical test. The manifestation of these same patterns by these patients at any other time was
accordingly not scored as a change.
When given amobarhital sodium prior to treatment, however, 30 patients (or 46 per cent of the total) showed some language change comparable to that noted during treatment. Table 3 shows the relation between
such changes at this time and the eventual clinical
response. These
changes were found in 68 per cent of the much improved patients, in 36
per cent of the moderately improved, and in 20 per cent of the unimproved groups.
TABLE 3.—-—Relation

of Pretreatment Language Changes with Amobarbital Sodium
to Eventual Clinical Response

Change

No.

Much improved
Moderately
improved
Unimproved

28

19

22

8

36

15

3

20

“ X2

=

10.30; P

&lt;

.01

Change with amobarhital sodium
68 per cent

*

�134

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

In table 4 it is demonstrated that the pretreatment change with the
drug was also prognostic of the eventual physiological response to treatment as measured by the degree of electroencephalographic slowing.
The over-all distribution just falls short of statistical signiﬁcance, although when those who showed high delta activity in both periods are
compared with all the other cases as a group, the difference is signiﬁcant
at the 5 per cent level of conﬁdence.
of Pretreatment Changes with Amobarbital Sodium to High
Degree EEG Delta Activity During the Second and Third Weeks of Treatment

TABLE 4.———Relation

Both weeks
high Delta Activity
One week
high Delta Activity
No high
Delta Activity
"‘X2

= 5.27;

Change with amobarbital sodium

No.

Change

P

&lt;

*

64 per cent

25

16

16

6

38

24

8

33

.10

Finally, the initial response to amobarhital sodium was also prognostic
of the degree of language change shown clinically and to the manifestation of withdrawal reactions with the drug during treatment (table 5).
Between Pretreatment Language Response to Amobarbital
Sodium and Clinical Changes and Withdrawal During Treatment

TABLE 5.——Relati0n

No.

Pretreatment

Three or more
clinical lan*
guage patterns

barbital sodium

= 4.26; P &lt;
'l'X2 = 6.88; P &lt;
"‘X2

.05
.01

tions to amobarbital sodium '1‘

30

18

60 per cent

21

70 per cent

35

11

31

12

34

response to amobarhital sodium
N0 pretreatment
response to amo-

Withdrawal reac-

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

135

DISCUSSION

The relationship of the language changes to the development of altered
brain function and to the clinical response is consistent with our original
hypothesis concerning the mode of action of electroshock treatment. In
6
studies4’
we have shown that the clinical outcome is related
previous
to the presence and degree of alteration in cerebral function. Using the
“amytal test”2 and the EEG as indices, it has been found that those
patients with the earliest and most persistent manifestations of cerebral
dysfunction were most likely to have a favorable response. Such physiological changes create the milieu which facilitates behavioral change.
The present study, analyzing language patterns, clariﬁes the nature of
the behavioral changes that occur with treatment.
The language shown originally (prior to treatment) may be summarized in the statement, “I have this particular illness.” The subject of
this sentence answers the question “who,” the predicate refers to “what,”
and the verb describes the relationship, including the temporal and intensity aspects. During treatment the subject of the sentence may be modiﬁed by changes in the use of person, so that the sentence might read,
“You [or he, she, or they] have this particular illness.” Changes in the
predicate are shown by such patterns as displacement or evasion. In displacement the sentence might read, “I have some other kind of illness,”
while, with evasion, it would be, “I have something, but I don’t know
what.” Changes in the verb are shown by denial, qualiﬁcation, or alteration of tense. In denial the statement would be, “I don’t have this particular illness;” a qualiﬁed sentence would read, “I might have this particular illnessg” while with alteration of tense the sentence would be, “I had
this particular illness.”
Some language patterns modify the sentence as a whole. If the patient
smiles, or if he introduces his statement by saying, “The doctors tell me
that . . . ,” any part or all of the sentence may be modiﬁed. In other
reactions, particularly those noted under amytal, the patient avoids giving any meaningful statement at all. In the withdrawal reaction he says
nothing or omits part of the sentence. In the use of cliches or cryptic
expressions no speciﬁc referential meaning can be drawn from the language.
It is evident from this analysis that the language changes are not
random or bizarre, but form a patterned reorganization of communica-

�136

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

tion characterized by an alteration in the patient’s attitudes to his problems and his illness. The patient either says he is not now and never has
been ill, displaces his illness temporally, spatially, or personally, is less
committed to his awareness of his illness by the use of qualiﬁcations, or
avoids the whole problem by evasion and noncommunication.
These patterns are comparable to those noted previously by Weinstein
and Kahn:l in patients with cerebral disorders, and referred to by these
authors as the “language of denial.” Similar language changes have also
been described following other somatic therapies. Frank“ 8 reports that
lobotomized patients avoid talking about the operation, and he states
that “the facility and glibness with which they say ‘well I had an operation for my nerves, I guess’ contain the quality of unconscious denial.”
Legault,9 working intensively with post-lobotomy patients, found persistent attitudes of denial. One patient, when asked why she came to see
the doctor, said it was her relatives’ idea. Many gave qualiﬁed responses,
saying they “supposed” they had had an operation. Others doubted that
the operation was on the brain, or used an evasive, stereotyped expression
as “some nerve in there,” or displaced the procedure as in, “Oh, yes, I
went to the hospital and got two black eyes.” When asked about the symtoms that led up to the operation, patients gave such response as, “It
seems to have gone.” In studying patients who showed clinical improvement following prolonged coma reactions in insulin coma therapy, we
have noted similar changes in language. In a case report10 we noted the
appearance of reduplicative phenomena, evasion, verbal denial, displacement, increased use of stereotyped expressions and cliches, cryptic responses, and much smiling and laughing, at a time when clinical improvement was most marked.
Since these language changes occur most frequently in patients who
are clinically evaluated as improved, may not the language patterns
themselves be the critical cues that give a favorable clinical impression?
There is traditionally much difﬁculty in rating patients after treatment.
Such evaluations are highly variable because of the lack of suitable
objective criteria. While there are other objective cues which can be used,
such as the amount of sedation required or the quantity of food eaten,
the appearance of these language patterns may constitute an operational
basis for clinical evaluation in the psychiatric interview.
Not all patients, however, who showed at least three of the language
changes were regarded as much improved, and not all of the much im-

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

137

proved patients showed this degree of change. There may be other
aspects of language and communication not covered by this study which
are signiﬁcant. Another explanation is that the use of these language
patterns may vary in time or in different situations. On the basis of our
previous observations of the “Amytal test” and the electroencephalogram
in electroshock patients, we should predict that unimproved patients
would show these language changes only transiently, while improved
patients would show them persistently. Future work should also be
directed toward comparison of language patterns shown when the patient
is speaking to a physician with those used when he is with his family or
friends. The degree to which members of the patient’s family are made
more comfortable by the changed language, and even their inclination to
use similar language, may explain the variability in the duration of
11 and
Both
Kahnl'
Weinstein
and
improvement following treatment.
Legault9 have indicated a relationship between the patterns of communication of the patient and those of his family.
Finally, our results demonstrate the prognostic usefulness of amobarbital sodium administered prior to treatment. The prognostic value of
the drug in the somatic therapies has been noted previously by Hoch12
and others,““14 who felt that patients who became more normal in
speech, ideation, and behavior under the inﬂuence of barbiturates were
most likely to improve with treatment. In the present study the manifestation of a change in language with the drug was related not only to
the development of altered brain function and to the clinical outcome,
but to the eventual manifestation of these language patterns clinically.
On this basis, an operational deﬁnition of the goal of electroshock therapy might be described as enduring clinical manifestation of those language patterns which occur initially only with amobarbital sodium.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

consecutive patients referred for electroshock treatment
were studied prior to and during the second and third weeks of treatment.
Each patient was tested at these times both clinically and with amobarbital sodium with a standard series of questions concerning attitude toward
illness.
2. The results showed that characteristic changes in language occurred
both clinically and with amobarbital sodium during treatment. These
changes were signiﬁcantly related to the clinical response to treatment
1. Sixty-ﬁve

�138

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF COMMUNICATION

M

and to the degree of alteration of brain function as measured by the
electroencephalogram.
3. The presence of these language patterns with amobarbital sodium
prior to treatment was related to the eventual clinical response, the development of altered brain function, and the development of language
changes clinically during treatment.
70

a

6050

40
'lo

30

FIG. 1.

CLINICAL

WITH

AMOBARBITAL

r-——|

I

uucu Imovso-

Ei Ionmovw
Cl ‘ummovso

Relation of each language pattern to response to treatment.

4. It is felt that these language changes constitute an operational basis

for the evaluation of the clinical response.
5. The results support the hypothesis that the therapeutic mechanism
of electroshock treatment is the development of different patterns of
symbolic adaptation to the patient’s problems and illness under the conditions of altered brain function.
REFERENCES
1. WEINSTEIN, E. A., AND KAHN, R.

2.

L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Springﬁeld, III., Charles C. Thomas, 1955.
SUGARMAN, L. A., AND LINN, L.: Diagnostic use of amobarhital
sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in organic brain disease. Am. J. Psychiat.

—, —,

112: 889-894, 1953.
3. —-~,
, AND MALITZ, 5.: Serial administration of the “Amytal test” for
brain disease: its diagnostic and prognostic value. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
71 : 217-226, 1954.

�CHANGES IN LANGUAGE DURING ELECTROSHOCK THERAPY

139

Relation between altered
brain function and denial in electroshock therapy. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.

KAHN, R. L., FINK, M., AND WEINSTEIN, E. A.:

76: 23-29, 1956.
WEINSTEIN, E. A., LINN, L.,

AND

KAHN, R. L.: Psychosis during electroshock

therapy: its relation to the theory of shock therapy. Am. J. Psychiat. 109:

22-26, 1952.
FINK, M., AND KAHN, R. L.: Quantitative studies of slow wave activity following electroshock, Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol. 8: 158, 1956.
FRANK, J .: Clinical survey and results of 200 cases of prefrontal leucotomy.
J. Ment. Sci. 92: 497-508, 1946.

—:

Some aspects of lobotomy (prefrontal leucotomy) under psychoanalytic
scrutiny. Psychiatry 13: 35-42, 1950.
LEGAULT, 0.: Denial as a complex process in post lobotomy. Psychiatry 17:

153-161, 1954.
10. KAHN, R. L., GRAUBERT, D.,

ll.

FINK, M.: Delusional reduplication of parts
of the body after insulin coma therapy. J. Hillside Hosp. 4: 134-137, 1955.
WEINSTEIN, E. A., AND KAHN, R. L.: Personality factors in denial of illness.
AND

Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 69: 355-367, 1953.
12. HOCH, P. H.: The present status of narcodiagnosis and therapy. J. Nerv. Ment.
Dis. 103: 248-259, 1946.
13. HARRIS, M. M., Honwn‘z, W. A., AND MILCH, E. A.: Regarding Sodium
Amytal as a prognostic aid in insulin and metrozol shock therapy of mental
patients (dementia praecox). Am. J. Psychiat. 96: 327, 1939.
14. GOTTLIEB, J. 5., AND HOPE, J. M.: Prognostic value of intravenous administration of Sodium Amytal in cases of schizophrenia. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 46: 86-100, 1941.

��r
i

,

‘

4‘

__

W

g

1"

'

3

m' 13 1956

‘

L

g

0

cm

In

meme: mama wrmsnocx mm!
Robert L.

mm, mm. (1)

m m; 3.9.

(2)

x
a

3

E

m the Roman Service, Rama 303mm,

f

610::

om, In

Ion-k

Research Assistant (Psychology).

(1)

(2) Inmmumrtufﬂmumrdn

:

um,upon,bymtmavrmmhmmmmeumwmmum

l

hum). Instant-a

We quiz
.

.____.,_T
f

3

32

I

m

M“

7

,

,

,

‘

of Heath, Public Health Service, and tin

mm mum :m'

W/we‘bé
,

.

I

��.————n.~—

um w-w—w,

m

,

c121:

ll‘ynbolié

rum“, gamma: in we tan a: mu.
m pal-amt imadglﬁm 1- 5 mm»: «mm t0 tut this Methods by

studying changes in

1mm:

um. ocetu' wﬁh transom.

speculum,

in: quantum war. ”mad:
1) he then numb-nun 1631153113131. chug“ in language
in the
a: 93.00th tmmu
2) An thug changes routed tn the clinical
rum?

cm
3)

1;)

tho

Imm-

which develop
‘

mmwmmmadummrmumz
1:.an
m
&lt;3th

no»

mum-mum at amour-him swim prior to

mm mane

pm

«no any chaugu Salaam
mu tax-tho mutual 611M681
“spams t0 tmtmnt, tho Moment 6:! ahead brain mum, and the m1»-

mt of language We! during treatment?

�www.—

mm
Pbpﬂatim

8mm.” «causative mun-.1- for 0103th mama

3W.

n: tho 3:11.146. Hoopim were
ha

ma Rutter mootmtimlator

was used an

puma, m: 16 mm trhud with m Index-art. mm was 20 m m that

nﬂaoanthm,andthoagaamngoﬁfm21t068o

1361th mudprbrto What, and nuuuddurxng tbs soc.
nadmok o: tmhent arm-hum medMM amen... and man; the third
Each

Mattel-havingmiv'ud'l-‘P

convulsions.

am was first team clinically,

m

and

muchatthcnoemiona tbsp“-

that after

Win]. ”dim had bun mun-

mm, slurred speech, dram

intend at the at. of .05
Per mm mm
sine” and awn 1n counting hackurd was We! (2).

m tut consist-d of

a.

“1m and ”mane” at 111m".

a»

standardised

an» of Question concerning orient»

nu stumr in band, hammer,

on

thg

mm”

to

was a.) ﬂaw in your Iain troublo? 2) Why am you
com to this 131100? 3)Ifmcon1dhnve mum, whutwoﬂdmwinhfar? 111
responses was mom 19mm. Mmum am: also
on such mam}.
only three or

.

aspects as

questions

mum,

laughing, gestural: and cum- bodily

m

mu.

�._.

m-

WW.Mmmmmm.m

W

—...—

,

"Hwy—n

warm

munmmgtmmsmmmemom nmaeatothathm
questions

gm clinically prior to treatment. were and at tho Malina.

uﬁmofwhat

mﬁWaWmewut
a:
chug-l,

1)

as to affect, mod,

um mm: m. mum Amen a: mg.

mum m.

nag. change wars noud

oval-

objoeuva changaain

gm author than mm” or inﬁerprouuw
In
mung, pitch, vein.

The

clinical): during the

saw at {amen-at:

alumna in ma tynucuml m a: pox-on, 2) 0mm. 3) «M

ma. h) Mama, 5) ohms. mu, 6) amt, 7) stereotyped
11:

oxpzésum and cliches, and a)
1. Album

ﬁrst pom singular is

wing and 12mm.

,

in tho pmtmttmt

Warmingtha

patient. used the second
or third pom and occasionally the ﬁrst. person plural. to me question anoaming min trouble such reopen.” ward given us ”It's what they call a depress-

10a.”-

17823.64, 28

Whaytoldmlmmﬁomuyandmmliuck,‘ We'mhavingalatef

trouble with

w mﬂme-lm,“ my cousinbrnght

no; she said

I was

mus,“

mam troublo, er mm mm,“ and my lira. it sick and I tram
tppmciato it
bar in how u soon a pas-ibis.”
thq mum
team
for coming to the heapiul m anomaly given a W wife hm: no," "W
"What‘s

11‘

tamortaldm to

m hora! oriwdeow mid mama mumm.‘

will: an: grim as “Part-rat
'

The

3.0%

mu: for w M13,"

W alumna.-

my

Tho

husband and

anwgoodfm uhauldbelnnlﬂvandhappy' mﬁmmaummmm
m Md.“

�“”1

‘

~5i
I

LAW

Men Wiring
m.
m
M
2.

w

1::

21

patients. rm-

with a question, as

”What. do.

mm; m
Wm momma

the queetioh about their
tea: the tom of

you new by

m main trouble?,' “that

do you

«poet

mo; won, what 1:: m,“ and "What «he 1 may last than?“ Gum-1W
patterns considered and" included such responses as ”I don't know how
to tell
you,“ ”I don’t get what you mean," "Let ale think,“
um hard to any,“ ad “I
no

to

m

Just don‘t
hint.

how

to expanse

11:."

One

patient asked the «minor to give her a

W. mutwmmammummwzspu
an,”
Wm
W.

1mm. they either

math-y

had no

um

«am or an

axing evasive “I don't mow” reapeneeo, denied
specifically questioned about. him.
'

eomltmont
the use

their illness and

a... arm-

mention a: a meme in the dimtion a: 1»-

m ohm by 19 patients.

a: were. as

”31103:,"

ably, " "possibly,“ ”man. be,“
were given no

'1 gun: I have

”pmbably that I'm

This lulguago pattern was characterised
by

”kind of,

“an,“

been

'

,

“sort at " ”think " “apparentlyﬂ "prob-

“assumed," and “perhape." That such

Jittery,” “I seen to

he very

ream

mammaed,“

mom,” “I suffer from emotion, apparently,“ ”Poenbly early
about the fume," ”I have sort or! gotten
momma,“
upset, I
and ”I think I'a a little inseam..."

W.

”W

‘

Inlapntiente therewaeaohangein

um,”

mum»

in; their 1111:)“. In most cane the patient used the past tense, as "I wan
depressed when I one here” or 'I had been
mm.” In other canoe the patient answered
the question about his main trmzble by
'

131%(2mg. In 20 cases

mung it in the future
there no a diamamnt

tense as 3 Huh.

of the

Wt

‘

W

to something other than originally given prior to
treatment. This was mummy
lest Bonan- than the original comm. Sometimes the
dilplacamnt was in the
tom of a emetic complaint, as laying the main trouble
was ”diarrhea," “headaches,“

�WWWWMI—Fr‘

.6.

'

”pm in the tests," “I slams the rings;- in the door,“

stair case: the displacemnt
as

‘33: main

form»!

m to some mores. aspect or the:

itch.” In
hospital situation,

trauma in getting those treatments," or “I'm upset because I

to another
7.}

and "I‘vs got. an

was

trans-

wand.”

Suﬁsm mania and 011mg.

Tho

use of stereotyped sxpmssim

andsliohumaambyupltisntl. Thsygan-uehnnponauunltmtam
undo:- the proper circumstance: Igd be

alright,"

with pupils than. are honorary and sinners,“
“The only
'1‘0 be

thing

«mm is

“(my

tmblo in)

monetary

"Tut’- the root of the

(bath and taxes,“ "Loam

my

pmblou

whole thing,“

lesson and be a

good boy,”

person a! pep Ind

nhtbility,” and “I just want to stop being a hly lent.“
Muhammlpmbdto‘aqusstimothsrmwishuth, 'Imnkllhmaoonsultw
a.

W.

husband borers

8.
laugh

I make a wish

became ho'a a

lawn: and the {nth-r or

InﬁOcaauthopatimtmmtodtoamoor

01m manuly wounding or following his

coming

xv childish."

suspense to the question can-

nu 111m".
to.

language

”zoom um:- ambarbitsl mom during to. mono and tom:

units of treatment. were 11min:- to those noted clmenlly. with the drug, haunt,
the changes 5mm earlier in the sour» or treatment. A given Imguags
pattern
might be noted in the second was]: at insistent with tho drug, but. would not occur

annually until the third

mt.

In Audition, the motions to the drug took more
extreme forms, which are ascribed
cryptic responses and withdrawal remnants.

1.

W.

u

patients. 3031mm” wars class-sdas cmtiswhmthsyhndmobﬁm relevance to the testqueetion ormthsir
31118

was shown by 23

m obscure, 1'31)an a very momma-d «pr-union. Thu: ms patient,
MWMsMntmnble, ma'mghmoftmuumomofmmmgattm
naming

night-am.” Others gave such msponsoa an

to. problem," ”gutting no husband to
you duo‘s get. the

naturism."

'1 MN. know the pmblsm -

cm‘t do

ma dm mo he does,“ or ﬁrm oouu I uy ..

�M_W~«W.“hm... ,Wﬁr—yyw'V‘amn"WW—wzmw. wm-u.www‘wex"w\’murvxl'ww’byum—lam. 7, am....-.. We.
.:

.

~

.

,

V

.

...

7

or

Wham-x“...

.3».

&gt;

my-

a.

~u..r-_..L-r.-‘~w

ﬂaw. ,‘m,r__ wry",

“Tee

‘11ng reaction. 8m pattern or withdrawal was noted in 33 patients.

2.

m: behavior we: ohenoteriled by ineomlete
egim, pomemtdon, the use
or failure to

eve-pond

of e

totem Manage

by

bilingual patients, and delay

to the questions. meet; patiente would cheruoterietioelly lie

m1.

with their eyes open, would

or turn their heed

clearly end promptly and in

would speak

eentencee, incoherent mumbling, mela-

when

the

miner epoke,

and

Well when asked motions not pertaining

to their illness.

comm

sodium

My

endwith ambarbitel
oom- changes in hnguege were newborn
in neponee to the other qua-time of the tut battery but not part of thie
more use frequent dimming of the manner, or uteri-mg to hm :- .‘Eﬂater.’

with the drug these Intimate

who had

e “punitive reaction,“

my

one

characteristic

characteristic patterns of acclimation for
place and time and contebuhtion deeorlbed in preview! communion! (2) .
of altered

man Motion,

showed the

the evaluation of clinioel

memo

to treatment we

mede

independently of

thie may. The Intimate were mted by the supervising peyohietnet in charge of
the teammate, the patient‘ﬂ om therapist end eupenieing peydxiatﬂat, anaby
the
director. 0:: the beeie of these ratings the petiente were unsealed

“eel

into three gmpa:

W

turned,

28

pmenu um widened much

which brought then

aiming

em

into the hoepitel;

eynptometio

22

improved, no longer showing the

petiente were rated as moderately

relief, but still

ehowing

dimming restore"

15 were ragweed ee mmproved, having elbow: on]: equivocal or

trmeient

and

We at

beet. me rating: were abort term evaluations, being ude within two loathe after
coupletim of

them.

�PERCENTAGE SHOWING EACH LANGUAGE PATTERN
ACCORDING TO RESPONSE TO TREATMENT

70
60

CLINICAL

I—————————-‘

WITH

AMOBARBITAL

l———_I

I

MUCH IMPROVED

El

UNIMPROVED

I400. IMPROVED

�*8.
For quantitative purposes the language change: diam during both the

mead

third week: of tmtaent have been grouped together“ as though the patient: had
been tested only once. If e particular pattern we chm during both periods, the
the: me scored only wee. ntegether, 895 of the petiente enabled at least one at
and

then patterns of

We manually

dining treatment. Such changes were

fomdinullthemch mpmvoepauembntinonly7motuuunmpmdm.

It as

nmt. and the amber
[the

patients

a:

chengee

who showed

mungmgo patterns.

three or

more leaguege

language change.

em

a.“ is

analysed

for

Wed petm
enlyZOSottbeunimpmedpaﬂenu

ienteehmdthmotmnlmgugechangee,
this degree of

When

We-

petum changes, there is a signiﬁ-

I).

‘gieent differ-wee between the groups (Table
shaved

clinieel

apparent that. there me e relation between the degru of

681 of the much

Bung cm! the menu dietdbuﬁdnie lim-

mMatbetmtnmth-uwaercmnm.
Relatian

of.

W

m 1mm (28)
WW MW (22)

W

(15)

1‘0“!- (65)

Chang"

W

Shawn

3.

Wally to Ream“ to Treatment.

lie.

lo.

5

1

19

685

9

32:

7

)2!

15

681

3

201

12

895

29
'

W

36

551

:2 - 11.25
1!

&lt;m

Hheneachlengmge pettemiemelyeedmdivimm,um1nﬂ¢m1,

itbecaneeeppemtthetnotenpe‘btem

wcmmequmymmw.

Inﬁlbntoaeem,emmmtmeftmmmmdpeumuwmmn

’

�Y

«my

v m. n.“ .-‘

nmxw

“gamma. — yawn
,

v

mama-gm

m

w“... n-

,.—., »1—0”

—W -.~.-

-

V

,

,

n «Fur

run...“ .-

-

. 17,1,»

-

.

,

men-1mm, mottheeecmdormmpeum, Wanda-Newt
o!

ambush;

The

aﬂy

1111311130

petum

on While}:

little airtime

was found between

mmmmmmmdmmamemdmmmum.

.Anuymatmmemwmwrmmmup-meumm
termerypueandwithdmel mam anlyinrigun 1. mmaypuc reepeneee did

mtnrymeh

with the

afferent groups, the

withdml,

moving of e

mum differentiated the three gmupe eigﬁfimm: occurring in 711 of the mach
Whﬂdthemdenﬂhhpmndmdmmzﬁottbmnpmdpauwu.
x.

:

mu.“

Mum of
In a

e to

.,

vs;

mea
new

M
of qumtitaﬁvm Mam electro-

Mama
pm
ducribed (6).
emeMgraphic
'

a

resend:

records an

m

inning relatively high,

middle

,a;

criteria
62‘

~

were established

low degree

for rating

of abnonnliia according

to five agitating avenge percent. time delta. wee (waves at :11 cycles per mood
or lees), the highest percent time delta. mm at my one low. the lowest tremmney

lathe moord,thehigheetamplitudeofdelteme,
burst. of delta

me.

mummumote

In the present study, an electroencephelogm wee obtained
priortotmmntandm the ”Windmirdmk a: treatment. Each ”comm

«alum mending to the dichom at showing
eliw er m, using the-e axe-Lurk.
In Table

ality
V

and changes

the relation-hip

2

in

animation, Wag
show a

1mm.

am

reletively h1g1 demo at ebnon'e-

mm mm abetroonaeplulognphtc linem.

Tho: patients with the

in
Why
of

high

mate; mm:

18

I.

greatest degree at cerebral

both the «can!

I2 a 10.72,

thinner:- at

mmt,

hmge change- both clinicallyxand with Waite]. and“...
the mama.
mum at! mime-u: at the drug effect.
'

m,

was the
3m. ran- to be statistically signiﬁcant.
I»

end.

Wimt

1%

better than the

'

11

level or

comm.

�ﬂ‘rﬁwwwme—wmm.
.

‘ermmmﬁmvﬁmimmw'

TABLE

Relation of Language Ghana.

’60

High

3

WW

(25)

OnMunimzé)

‘

lo 315: Ahnamauw (2h)

mm

withdrawal Motion!
with W191}. Seem:

i

lo.

1

15

as

a

50%

6

255

-

15

601

_

9

5“

‘

B

335

. Yoa
P &lt; 0°,

:2

12

Language

when they

._._.r,._r.

Eloctmmmalom Dunne

,

m1:

&lt;

‘

Both Weeks 31g:

2h:

,

of Treatment

clinical]:

lo.

may
“at

on the

or Kan

changes

m._.—r.m~.

2.

83m and Third ﬂecks

the

,

P

pat-Mm «termed in that: stuck wan

manned afar tho original

’ has?
.19

&lt;

midsmd a:

change:

mmmm clinical test which an

and u a. baseline. Bum patients, 11mm, .Ihmd can form of than 1mm
puttem in the initial 91.1mm test. me minimum or thus same pattern!

bythaeepnuenuatmomrtimmmonnnmnatuconduachmgo.
mm gum

Wits). actual prior to tmtmt, War, 30 patients", at

Wot‘ﬂwmu,mmdmhngmgammnbhmmntnommtmh
neat. In‘hbh3thonhumbomahmgamhchmguat mamumhm
m'mmmeumm mm». Manfmdméﬁﬁdmmw
pmdpmmnu, thwzyséiutlmnoammynwdwamozmmmd

W.

.

‘

,

par" .—
.V

�w :u—v-r—wwxv—mww:

Relatim of

W

W3

Pn-tmmt Language

Ghangon

autumnal Mun

with

mm

and

clinical Mona

cm. with Ambarbital mu
1

Ho.
Knob Impravod (28)

Hodomtely

MIMI:

W

68$

19

(28)

8

36%

3

W

30

It“

(15)

Tom (65)

l

:3 - 10.30

P&lt;
In Tab}.
was

I;

.01

it 1. “inﬁltrated that the pm-vtmtmnt change with the

also prognostic of tho eventual

drug

Widow anionic to tmtment as mound

ouctmcaphalogmmc abnomanw. Tho mun distribution 3m;
tall: chart at statistical lawman, although
than who
my: almonby

m.

magic.

01'

m

mlityinboﬂpeuoda an conpnrodwiﬂzall’ehsothor
crence is significant at th- 51 1m]. 91‘ canﬂdonoo.
Relation of

ma

mnuam, thaw:-

Pwtmmt Languag- Ghanges with manual. Sodium and High Basra

Em Abnomliw Drug the Second and Third Weeks of Tmman‘b

Both Wuks High
One week

mmty (25)

M Announnw (16)

Chung: With Amobarbital Sodium
Ho.
1

16

6&amp;1

6

.

38$

’

la

High Abnormality (2h)

8

335

- 5.27
P&lt;olO

1a

�many,

the

initial

degru a! Ianguagl clung. I‘hm cunicamand
"actions with the drug during twat-ant (km: S).
tho

m
hcpom to
5

.

human at Pro-tantalum

sodium.an pregnant?“ at
to tho Mutation otirithdmnl

response to ambarbital

Language

.

NW
mm mm:

5041mm

.

1':

011mm Chang“

and Withdrawal Remuom

3

Clinical
PatternLeague.
03' Hora

lo.

Pmtmmm Respom to

max-mm Sodium

(30)

In l’ru—treatment Response
to Mammal Soditm (35)

18

,

11

:2 aims

9‘00;

Withdrawal Reaction!
ﬁo Amour-Mu]. Sodium

1

30.

i

601

21

705

311

12

3M

- 6.38
P&lt;ll°1

x2
_

�'Iwwa‘v-rI—Ku,WM wc-v—

~33-

w".—

«my. qzwrr

*

Discussim
the relationship or the language changes to the development of sltsred brain
function and to the clinicsl reepcnee is cmistent with our original vaethesie cenceming the nude
have shown

ct action or electmehock treatment. In previous stmnee

that the clinical

outcome

is related to the

(hﬁé) we

presence and degree of

alter-

”mm

test" (2) and the we as indicse, it
has been fomd that those patients with the earliest and most persistent Mutations
were met likely to have a favorable response. Such physioof cerebral
aticn in cerebral function. Using the

mm

logical changes create the milieu which facilitates behavioral change.
present study, analysing language petteme, clezii’ies the nature a: the
beheviorel changes that occur with treatment.
the language chem criginelly, mic:- tc. treatment, my be amused in the
The

statement, "I have this particular illness.”

The

subject or this sentence answers

the questicn 'Who,’the predicate refers to What,‘ and the verb describes the relationship, including the femoral and intensity aspects. During treatment the sub-

dectoi’thesentencemybenoﬂtiedbycmngesinthemotpereon, eothntthe
sentence night read "You (or he, she or they) have this particular illness." Changes
in the predicate are shown by such. ﬁettem as displacement or evasion. In displncs-

nent the eentencc night tied “I have ecu other kind of illness," em... with evasion,
whet.” Change: in the verb are
it would be, "I have something, but I don't

m

qualification or alteration of tones. In denial the statement would
be, “I don‘t have this particular illnessg' a. qualified sentence would read, “I light
have this particular illneseg“ while with alteration or tense the sentence would be,
"I as this particular illness,”
ﬂown by deniel,

Sons language psttems- modify

the sentence as a whole.

"

If

the patient

mice,

or 1: n. introduces his etstewent by saying. "no doctors tell me theta...“ any, pert
or all of the sentence my be emailed. Other reactions, particularly those noted
under mytcl amid giving any meaningful
statemt at ell. In the withdrawal reaction

w”...

�W,

wwcww—mw '-—-—'- ..r.-_m..—w.,

”ﬁr .,,,,.:.._._‘,._.. r_.‘-“‘1KvW“ﬁW——r—W‘w‘wwﬂwmwwi'w

,_,.
WWW .Vw—ya-awwmwnmr

an...

Wpemsaysnoﬂﬁngormiupertottlnsen’om. Intheuseotoliohesot
cryptic expxessions no specific referential meshing can be dram free the language.
or

numemm-WumtwmoW-mmom
bot rose mourned

him,

mrzaniutim

a

of

omioeuon Motorised by

so

alteration in the petient's attitudes to his problems and his illness. The patient
either says he is not now and never has
ill, displaces his illness temporslly,
or parsmslly, in less committed to his
or his illness by the
use of quelifioeums, or avoids the whole problem by evasion and
These pettems en oonpereble to these noted previously by Weinstein end
Kahn (1) in patients with cerebral disorders, and who Memo to than as the
"m3.

w

spam

use

of detain."

Sinus: lsngusge

mm”

Manon.

changes have also been described following other

emetic therapies. Frank (7,8) reported that lebotonised ptiente avoid talking
sheet the operation, end he states that " the teoility and glibness with which they
say Well 1 had so operation for
nerves, I guess' contain the quality a! moon-:'

scion!»

q

denial." Benoit (9), working

mummy with postnlobotouy patients,

some

‘

persistent attitudes a: denial. the patient. when asked why she ems to see the doot-or, said it was her, relatives' idea. new game qulii'ied responses, saying they
owned the operation was on the brain, or
used an evasive, stereotyped «passion as "sou nerve in there,” or aispleoed the
procedure es in “oh, yes, I went to the hospital and got one black eyes.“ when asked
“suppose“ they had an operation. Others

'

about the symptoms that led up to the eperstioo suoh responses were given as

”it

seems

to have gone." In stucbring patients who showed clinical improvemt following prelooged om reactions in insulin eons thin-em, we have noted sinilsr changes in lengoege.

In a ease report

(.10) we noted

the sppeerenoe of nduplicetive phenomena,

evasion, verbal dermal, displacement, incmsed use or stereotype expressions and

cliches, eryptio responses and moh mung and laughing at

pmemt was most marked.

s.

time than

clinical ile-

�wmmmemMMp‘mmm
mmmamuwmmmmpmmmum

mmmum nugtammmmmr ‘mmumm

mmwuumpmmmm MWmm
mmammammwmwmm ultimatum

awn'mmamhMMuMdemwmm
utyotrmdummwdmmpmmwmututamw
mmmrormmumummm um.
mapm,m,mmummumwmu
unwumwwmmammwpﬂmm
mommd'm mummommdhwudmmmm
.

mmwmsmméhmummt. Wruﬂmﬂmumtﬂnm

amewma-wmmmwmmnmm. fathom

deﬂumﬂmdtﬂ‘WM’udm-Wm
an,uwmmtmmpmmmmg
mmwtm.mwpmmmmmupem
may, WMWMMWMWWRWM
n-

wtbpmsnumammmmmuummmorm.
mumwtbpmvammyummnmmbnbymmm,
mammmmmwmmm,mmmnmmhmwdm
duration of
tone-mg
and

!

1

Wt
hmt(9)mmmamumummpmmammam
mutant;

nmmmrumv

Both

Hon-ma

Km (1,

n) and

'

'

m.mmquWWde-ob
iummmummg mpwmamwmmmm
‘

’

mmmmmupmmwmm)uomm.mmmz
mtmmmmmumgw,mmnmwmurwm

i

�”mm

“mm“..m—wwaww—lw"""
,

A

m.

wl’vr-w—w-‘mx'r-

:46nnuanco at barbiturates were most likely to 1W0 with treamnt. In the pumt
at. chum mmguagowieh‘mdmgm nut-daetenlyto
an Mom's a! alum bmn sanction and to the clinics].
but to the av.

mmwamum

5mm mutation of then

1mm puttom' clinically.

mm.

this built, an aparauaml definition at the god of electroshock therapy night be «scribed an enduring
On

mm museums: of than mm natural which only occur initially with no.

humui main.

'

�v."

77—79». mm?

-

,

WW.

W'm“wu}—r¢ MN '-v" r

0.: navy—w

'

,

_

,

4

“aw—Ia

W.wmv3ww,wmx-. WW,'—-‘W ~01”

my

iyg‘w 'w-w Hunwyw—m...“

4.7.»

may
1.

,

GWI

saw-an ammunw mums rotomd for!" platteﬂmck What an
tmtasnt. Mmﬁent’

ammwwmmmmmmu
clinicallymdwith
m
umummww

suburbia). BOMﬂthiltﬂndu,

am: at Mom mooning unwa- mm 1111mm.
2. mo result: :1th that. ahamoteriatia chug“ an language We both
01mm and after gum-mm ”dim during mums. mm ohmgu we. sign“-

and

1canﬂy

”hudtothe

chainsaw-panes to tmtmntmdtaﬂmdegreoufalund

mum at maund by thc alwmlogm.
3. Tho presume at then 1mm mam with ambit-him ”(than pain:to tmtmt was directly mum to th- mntml clinical aspen-e, tho Malay-sent

bruit:

'

otaltendbrainfmcﬁm. undthadmlomntutlanguagcchmgu clinicallydnring
treatment.

that than language éhangu What. an opomtim bun
m- m mluntim of the clinical
5. the mum: ‘n'mport an hypoﬂmia that tho thanpeutio
or
oloctroshoak Mama“. in the develomt of walnut putt-m at symbolic adapt.
1;.

It. in

$311:

mm.

mum to the pntiont'u problem and 111m”

talcum.

am.
_

War the

conditions

a:

slum brain

.w-wm.

__..,‘ ’n’rr' 2-}—

�1o

“sustain, E.

A. and Kuhn, R. L.

AW, Springticld,
2.

,

1111mm,

8mm,

,

.

W
cum:

of

L. A. and Man,

("mm Sodium")

39am.

I

maul!

Evacuated.

mm, 1955.
L. : Dwain Us. at Ambaxbitul

6.

argma Brain

1n

Symbolic and

maul, Ann-1m J. meant...

$183943?!» 1953..

”J

3. _____,

and

mm,

Psychintg,

E:

Serial Administration at the

for

”Am/ta]. Test."

“mm,

MILL. Arch.

217.226, 1951;.

1!. and Yul-match, E. A. s

h. mm, R. 1... Pink,
cation and

x

It: Diagnostic and Prognostic Vila,

Brain 131mm:
a:

3.

mm in Ebotroﬂxock Therapy,

361.31% Between

Alum: Bran rm-

L114. Arch. ”enrol.

G:

'

Pageant...

in press.
5. Renown, E.

It:

am:

1.,

L. and Kuhn, B.

Linn.»

Kantian be the

of

Timmy

La Psychosis During Electmhock
Shock Ehex'npy, Am.

J. Paychiatu

'

14.

and

mm, 3. Lu Quantitative Studies

mammm. m. cm
7. Frank,

J.

I

clinical Survey

J. ﬂuent. 301.,
8.

23!

1;th, 0.:

Dani-.1

161. 1994.
10.

ram,

R.

Body

at

1956.

,

7

(Putnam

mom) Under Psychoanalytic

u a comma m” in Post know, yummy, u: 1531

1mm 0m

11.:

morally. a.

11. Hem-tan, E. A. and Kuhn, R. In:
Arch.

Activity Founding

354:3. 1950.

I... Gmubert, n. and Fink,
Am:-

-

mm o: 200 Cm: or Putnam Macaw,

of lobotomy

Scrutiny, Psychiatry.

9.

(mm).

Heumphysiol. g: 158
and

Slow wave

”7-508. 13%.

Some Aspects

I

01‘

mt

'

22-26, 1952.

6. Pink,

Burk»

mm. a: Pawn»... éi‘

Delusional Redupliaation of Parts at th-

mum. Wm,

Personality Eastern

b; ”Iv-1&amp;7. 1955.

1:: Denial of
’

355-367, 1953.

Inna”,

�"ﬂ..- v.w-m,.__wWR—v~.....,1,..e..r.»-w.q.w,__ v7

Koch, P.

313.,

n. : no

Prognostic

n W

“F"

_~—,w .—

Mm

vunw

H.‘

r u-vn

~..»u-,Ww—~wwwwnw~. WVWVWW

,wuwyﬂ—w ”Maw—v.4.

1911.6:

Roma, 3. A. and men, n. 4.:
lid in Insulin and Home]. Shock

mgammg
‘I‘hompy

(was Pmeox), m. a. Paychitt" 2g: 327. 3.939.

11;.

‘swa

ant. Status as Memo-1- and Thoupy, J. Harv. Mont,

m8 W59;

13. Harris, :4. a...

,

scum was. as a

of Inantal Patients

Mm», a. s. and Hop-,4. u. ! Pragmatic van; ,0! 1:11.va amusmum
at Mm W]. in ease: of Schisommin, Arch. 3mm}... &amp; Wt.f 5g:
86400.

'

191.1.

'

um"

,

l u, ,,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2544">
                <text>Changes in language during electroshock therapy. In P.H. Hoch and J. Zubin (eds.), Psychopathology of Communication. Grune and Stratton, New York, 1958: 126-139.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2545">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2546">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-27-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2547">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2548">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2549">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2550">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2551">
                <text>[preprint] and reprint. Reprint from Psychopathology of Communication Grime &amp; Stratton. Inc., 1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2552">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2553">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74457">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81018">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87579">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94140">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="273" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="64">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/cd19f1b46d47e649344f387e918358a2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>402d7d717080af9c10d773a24db00fb9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100690">
                    <text>Reprinted from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No.

1,

Sept-Oct. 1959.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to
Electroshock Therapy
ROBERT L. KAHN,

PH.D., and MAX FINK, M.D.

In previous studies”,7 we found that patients who were most likely to improve from
electroshock treatment exhibited persistent
and relatively marked degrees of altered
brain function, as measured by the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital test for
brain disease.10 We reported, furthermore,7
that patients who improved with electroshock treatment had developed a language
pattern similar to- that previously described
by Weinstein and Kahn}3 in their studies of
neurological patients with cerebral dysfunction. Weinstein and Kahn described a language pattern which they called “language
of denial” and demonstrated the relationship
of this language pattern to the premorbid
personality of the patient.
On the basis of these observations, we assumed that the patients most likely to beneﬁt from electroshock treatment would be
those who most closely approximated the
“explicit verbal denial” personality.11
To test this hypothesis, we studied 63 consecutive patients referred for electroshock
therapy. The selection of patients for treatment was made by the psychiatric staff, independent of the judgment of the authors.
Thepatients ranged in age from 20 to 66,
with a mean of 47, and included 21 men and
42 women. Prior to and during treatment
each patient was evaluated according to the
following methods:
1. Structured Family Interviews: Personality was evaluated in interviews with members of the patient’s family. At the opening of the interview, the relative was asked
to describe, in his own words, the patient’s
usual interests and attitudes. The relatives
were encouraged to talk about any aspect
they wished, and the interviewer followed
the trend of their talk, rather than proceedFrom the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
Aided by grant M-927 of the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, United
States Public Health Service.
Presented at a meeting of Electroshock Research
Association, Chicago, 1957.

ing in a serial fashion. The interviewer
asked questions, however, to obtain information in 15 speciﬁc areas which have been
described as characteristic of the “explicit
verbal denial” personality. The number and;
type of questions required'with each relative
varied according to the degree of spontaneous production and the informant’s capacity to comprehend and communicate. The informant was encouraged to give concrete:
examples of all statements.
The patients were evaluated as to the pres
ence and extent of the following character
istics: whether they (1) stressed verbal
symbols such as resolutions, homilies, cliches-and rationalization; (2) were prestige and;
security conscious, and did not enjoy the in;
trinsic beneﬁts of health, work, leisure
money and property; (3) regarded illnéSs:
as an imperfection or disgrace, keeping it an; ,
secret from family and neighbors, and were
reluctant to seek medical care; (4) tended)
to “shake off” their own troubles and to be)
regarded as practical persons who advise,
others; (5) possessed much drive and coma
pulsive energy and felt guilty or uneasy if
not occupied; (6) were conscientious, with a
high sense of duty and responsibility; (7)
were sensitive to criticism, regarding it as
an attack on their integrity; (8) were proud
and tended to avoid help from others; (9)
were reserved rather than openly affectionate or emotional; (10) emphasized being correct; (11) lacked imaginativeness and creativity; (12) were not considered by their
relatives as dependent; (13) did not discuss
sex openly; (14) did not have temper outbursts; and (15) were not “ludic”—a term
taken from Piaget8 and used by Weinstein”
and Kahn12 to denote comic, tragic or melodramatic behavior.
After the interview, each item was rated
on a scale of O, 1 or 2. A score of O was
given if the aspect was noted to a minimal
degree; a score of 1 indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a
score of 2 indicated the deﬁnite and marked

,»

.

,

'

'

�'

presence of the pattern. The scores for each
item were added and, the resultant score
termed the “denial personality score.”
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was
interviewed prior to treatment and at weekly
intervals during and following the course of
treatment. The clinical evaluation was determined by the patient’s behavior in the
few weeks following the end of the course of
treatment, and was based on the evaluation
of the patient’s therapist, the therapist’s supervising psychiatrist and the supervising
psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock
treatment unit. Patients were classed into
three groups: much improved, moderately
improved, or unimproved, following the criteria outlined previouslyf‘
3. Language Study: In addition to. the

clinical interviews, each patient was examined with a standardized series of questions
directed at determining his attitude toward
his illness. Two of the questions asked were
“What is your main trouble?” and “If you
had one wish, what would you wish for?”
The patients were tested before and during
treatment, and the verbatim responses were
analyzed for changes in language, according
to the method previously described.7
Treatment for all patients consisted of
grand mal electroshock, using a Reiter elec—
trostimulator or a Medcraft alternating-current instrument, on a schedule of three treatments per week.
Of the 63 patients, we were able to- interview the relatives of 47; and the present
study refers to this group. The denial personality scores ranged from 0 to 25, with a
median of 11. For statistical comparison
the patients were divided into two groups.
Patients with scores ranging from 11 to 25
were considered the “high denial” group,
while those with scores from 0 to 10 were
classed as low in denial tendencies.
Personality Score and Clinical Response:
Patients with high denial personality scores
in these family interviews were most likely
to be rated as much improved, and only one
case was considered unimproved (Table I).
In patients with low scores, however, the
clinical response rating occurred on a chance
basis, with 30% of the patients being regarded as unimproved.
')
.«

TABLE I
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Response to Electroshoclc
Denial

Much

Personality Improved
Score
11 - 25
0 - 25

14

Total

Moderately
Improved Unimproved

Total

7

9
9

1
7

24
23

21

18

8

47

The difference in the denial scores between
the much and moderately improved patients,
when compared to the unimproved patients,
is statistically signiﬁcant (at 1% level of
conﬁdence by Mann-Whitney U Test). Although the much improved patients have a
higher mean score than the moderately improved group, this difference is not signiﬁcant.

Qualitative Observations: Although there
is a relationship between high personality
scores and the clinical rating, 30 per cent of
the patients with low denial scores were also
evaluated as showing a marked improvement.
While the group of seven patients is a small
one, certain common characteristics can be
described. Although these subjects lack the
competitive drive, prestige and security
needs of the high denial subjects, they show
a similar lack of creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically of their
own or others’ feelings. They relate to the
environment primarily by nonverbal forms
of communication. They are described by
their families as laughing or crying excessively and as showing anger by muteness—
“going into a shell,” “walking out of the
room in a huff”——or by violent tempers with
table-pounding, throwing objects or direct
physical assault.
Personality Score and Changes in Language: By means of the technique of language analysis described in a previous
study,7 the changes in language in clinical
interviews ~were compared with the denial
personality scores. Nine patterns of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or symptoms, displacement, qualiﬁcation, etc., have been described as characteristically occurring after electroshock. As in
the previous study, each patient was classiﬁed according to the dichotomy of whether

�.

qr nothe showed three or more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial
personality scores showed a greater number
of language changes than those with low
denial personality scores (Table II). The
coefﬁcient of correlation between the personality scores and the number of language
changes is +.71, signiﬁcant at better than
the 1% level of conﬁdence.
TABLE II
Relation of Denial Personality Scores to
Clinical Language Changes Daring Treatment
Denial
Personality Scores
11 - 25 (20)
0 - 10 (20)

N 0. Language Changes
0

—

2

3

or more

.................................. 8
.................................. 17

12

Total ........................................ 25

15

3

Illustrative Cases
Case 1. High Denial Personality Score: A 61-yearold housewife was admitted to the hospital with a
15—month history of insomnia, abdominal. pain and
fear of cancer. On admission she was depressed,
retarded and seclusive, evincing little interest in

her surroundings and wandering aimlessly about
the ward.
The patient was described by her husband as a
conscientious, dependable, responsible person with
much integrity. She had no hobbies or outside interests, and was unable to relax; as a consequence,
she busied herself with chores at home. She was
“mortally afraid” of doctors, minimized her illnesses and concealed ailments even from her husband. Very restrained, she showed no affection or
emotion, never discussed sex and rarely lost her
temper. She had “a long memory for little things
if she felt that she was wronged,” a “streak of stubbornness,” and would “just as soon hold another
person responsible for her mistakes.” She was proud
and would “rather go- without food” than borrow
or take money from others.
According to the denial criteria, her score was 20.
After 20 electroshock treatments, she became euphoric, took an interest in her personal appearance and participated in hospital activities. Her doctor called her a “model” patient who, “while reluctant to discuss her personal feelings, asserted
that she had no difﬁculties at home, had a wonderful husband who was very good to her, considered herself lucky and eagerly anticipated her discharge.” She was discharged with a rating of

“much improved.”
Case 2. Low Dental Personality Score: A 41year-old housewife was admitted to the hospital
with a two-year history of depression following the
birth of her fourth child. She cried frequently, lost
interest in social activities, found it increasingly
difﬁcult to take care of her baby and had suicidal

thoughts. On admission it was noted that the patient paid little attention to her personal appearance, cried readily, showed psychomotor retardation and was circumstantial in speech.
The patient was described by her husband as a
“negative personality” with whom it was not easy
to get along because she was opinionated and argumentative. He regarded her as “completely impractical, with no common sense.” She was a poor
housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other
people, although not the kind of person who would
put herself out for others. An excessively talkative
person, she liked to engage in long, intellectual, pretentious conversations. When angry, however, she
Would become either completely mute or “very
nasty, implying you just don’t know any better.”
Although considered a “cold” person, she was able
to talk freely about sex. She frequently complained of physical ailments and went to physicians
readily. She was “naive” and “unrealistic,” believing, for example, that she had a ﬂair for writing
although others considered her amateurish.
Her personality score was rated as 4.
The patient received 18 electroshock treatments,
which were terminated at her own insistence because she was too frightened to take any more. At
the time of her discharge her doctor noted her as
“quite depressed,” but felt it was doubtful that she
could beneﬁt from further treatment at the hospital.
She was discharged with the recommendation for
continued psychotherapy.

Discussion
The structured family interview was designed to test the Specific hypothesis derived from earlier observations that patients
with the “explicit verbal denial” personality
are most likely, with electroshock therapy,
to show both the language and behavioral
changes which are rated as much improved
by the examiner. The data support this hypothesis and are also consistent with the
theory of the mode of action of electroshock
therapy advanced by Weinstein, Linn and
Kahn in 1952.9 They suggest tha “. . . the
therapeutic eﬂicacy of electroconvulsive therapy . . . derives from the production of a.
state of brain function in which the mechanism of denial is facilitated in characterologically disposed individuals.”
The degree of explicit verbal denial is,
however, only one personality aspect affecting the behavioral response to treatment. On
the basis of the present data and methods of
analysis, a broader View of’ personality patterns in relation to improvement with EST
is now possible. Those patients who are
rated as clinically improved are character-

'

�8va

—

_

,r-Pff-‘wu

‘:_‘_":':'*'r‘-n-€"L

,V"-~.'

-:
&lt;

,2

ized as: (a) nonempathic—unable to think
critically or sensitively about the needs, feelings or communications of others; (b) nonintrospective—unable to think critically
about their own feelings or needs, or to
achieve insight even with the collaboration
of others in the psychotherapeutic relationship; (0) relying heavily on nonverbal communication—even when they are talkative
there is little referential communication, the
words being clichéd, stereotyped or representative of feelings and emotions rather than
transmitters of information; and (d) highly
conventional—without imaginative or creative capacity, and with few resources to deal
with stressful or new situations.
With this pattern as the common background, two classes of patients who respond
to treatment can be deﬁned: the driving, conscientious, independent, successful, emotionally controlled person who can be characterized as the “explicit verbal denial” personality type; and the chronically inadequate, affectively labile and ludic, dependent person, coming from an impoverished
sociocultural background. While both types
are rated as improved in their short-term
response to electroshock, preliminary followup observations indicate that the “explicit
verbal denial” personality type is more likely
to sustain the clinical response, while the
ludic group is likely to relapse quickly.
Consistent with our previous studies we
have found that altered brain function is a
necessary condition for behavioral change
with electroshock therapy. The kinds of behavioral change shown with altered brain
function, however, vary markedly in different patients. Some show mood changes and
denial or displacement of symptoms, and are
rated as improved. Others develop paranoid
agitated states, become withdrawn or show
additional somatic or memory complaints,
and are rated as unimproved. In this study
we have stressed the personality factors in
those cases whose behavioral response was
rated as improved. We have not considered the patients who were rated as only
moderately improved or unimproved. If the
basic hypothesis is correct, we should also
ﬁnd a relationship between personality and
the behavioral response in patients who are
rated as unimproved. Present information
4.:

in this regard is minimal, as this problem
has not been approached with a speciﬁc hy-“
pothesis.
These observations raise questions concerning the relation of personality to type
of mental illness and choice of therapy. Clinical observations support the concept of a
characteristic premorbid personality. Abraham1 noted that states of depression occur
in obsessional persons. Arnot2 described depressed patients as being overconscientious
and perfectionistic. Hamilton and Mann,5
reporting various aspects of the personality
in involutional depression, included such features as “followed a rigid pattern of behavior . . . displayed a lack of imagination . . .
narrow range of interest . . . thorough, conscientious, meticulous devotion to duty . . .
lack of feeling for point of view of others
. . . hard, uncompromising drivers . . . oversensitive . . reserved.” Cohen et al.,3 in
an intensive study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients as being
highly prestige conscious; little concerned
with problems of interpersonal relatedness;
stereotyped; conventional; having little capacity for communicative interchange; and
unaware of other persons’ feelings toward
them or of their feelings toward others. They
emphasized the patients’ inability to communicate verbally and suggested that the therapeutic relationship should be in nonverbal
terms rather than emphasizing the intellectual content of the exchange,
These studies of the personality background of depression show a pattern that
is most similar to those personality aspects
which have been described as the “explicit
verbal denial” personality. The factor of
personality could thus explain the fact that
depression is the condition that responds
best to electroshock treatment. The same
personality factors which make a person
susceptible to a depressive reaction are those
which make him responsive to nonverbal
forms of therapy. These factors enable him
to respond, under the conditions of altered
brain function, with those language and
other behavioral changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same stereotypy, conventionality, perfectionism and
prestige consciousness which produce a cat-

'

&gt;

�.'

respOnse in the individual faced
astrophic
7
With the loss, of a partner, job, business or
u'loiv‘ed one permit the development of denial,
minimization and displacement under the
conditions of altered brain function and are
deemed “improved” by the family and the
therapist.

Summary and Conclusions
To summarize, we believe that our results
show that aspects of personality can be differentiated, which are signiﬁcantly related
to the response to treatment. The basic personality pattern of the patients Who respond
best to electroshock treatment can be characterized as (a) nonempathic, (b) nonintrospective, (c) communicating nonverbally
and ((1) highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imaginative or creative capacity. Within the context of this common
care, there are two main subdivisions of improved patients. One group is comparable
with the “explicit verbal denial” personality,
showing such features as drive, conscientiousness, independence and emotional control. The other group consists of persons
apt to be chronically inadequate and dependent, coming from deprived sociocultural
backgrounds, who are affectively labile and
ludic. The same personality factors which
contribute to a depressive reaction contribute to a behavioral change, under the conditions of altered brain function following
electroshock therapy, which is evaluated as
improvement.

.
.
.

REFERENCES
Abraham, K.: Selected Papers on Psychoanalysis. (The Hogarth Press Ltd., London, 1949.)
Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality. Arch.
Neural. (G Psychiat, 76:617-618 (1956).
Cohen, M. B., et al.: An Intensive Study of
Twelve Cases of Manic—Depressive Psychosis.
Psychiatry, 17 :103-137 (1954).
Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG
Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electroshock. Arch. Neural. c6 Psychiat, 78:516-525,
1957.

10.

11.

12.

13.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Hoch, P., and Zubin, J. (eds.), Depression, pp.
199-209 (Grune d2 Strattan, New York, 1954).
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock. Arch. Neural. c6 Psychiat.,
76:23-29 (1956).
Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy, in Hoch,
P., and Zubin, J. (eds), Psychopathology of
Communication, pp. 126.
Piaget, J .: Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood (W. W. N ortau, New York, 1951).
Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L., and Kahn, R. L.:
Psychosis During Electroshock Therapy: Its
Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy. Am.
J. Psychiat, 109:22-26 (1952).
Weinstein, E. A., et al.: Diagnostic Use of Amo—
barbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Organic
Brain Disease. Am. J. Psychiat, 112:889-894
(1953).
Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Personality
Factors in Denial of Illness. Arch. Neurol. (Q
Psychiat, 69:355-367 (1953).
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugarman,
L. A.: Ludic Behavior in Patients with Brain
Disease. J. Hillside H08p., 3:98-106 (1954).
Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of
Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects.
(Charles 0'. Thomas, Springﬁeld, Ill., 1955.)

'

��March 1957

£471.“.

Personality Factors in Behavioral

Response

to ElectroShock Therapy

Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D. and.Max Fink,

From
New

WW.

M.

D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,
York.

Aided by

M—92? of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
of Health, United States Public Health Service.

grant

Institutes

Presented to the Electroshock Research Association, Chicago,

l.

,

l,

,

,

gnu-H‘SVAmh-ﬁy,

May

1957.

�INTRODUCTION

The

behavioral response of patients receiving electroshock therapy

variable.
noted

In previous studies of the factors related to

that patients

who showed

is

this variability

early, persistent and relatively

we

marked degrees

of altered brain function, as meaSured by the electroencephalogram and the

amobarbital

test for brain disease (10),

were most

response which was rated as improved (h) (6) (7).

likely to
The

show a

clinical

present study is an

investigation of the role of personality in the behavioral response.

explicit hypothesis concerning this relationship has been derived

An

from previous

studies of the patterns of behavioral

change occurring with EST.

In an analysis of language changes

after electroshock (7),

patients

patterns as explicit denial of illness;

who develop such language

we

reported that

personal, Spatial and temporal displacement of symptoms; and qualification,
evasion and minimization are rated as improved. These language patterns are

similar to those previously described

by Weinstein and Kahn (13)

studies of neurological patients with cerebral dysfunction.

in their

They characteru

ized this behavior as the "language of denial" and demonstrated a relationship
to personality. In particular they described the characteristics of the "ex-

plicit verbal denial" personality (11).
the hypothesis was advanced

On

the basis of these Observations,

that those patients

this "explicit verbal denial" personality type
the behavioral changes
The purpose

after EST

who most

closely approximated

would be more

likely to

Show

which are rated as improved.

of the present study, therefore,

was

to determine:

1) whether personality characteristics related to the behavioral
reSponse to electroshock therapy can be differentiated; and
2) whether patients with greater "denial" tendencies are more likeLy

to

show

proved.

behavioral changes

after electroshock therapy

which are

rated as

imp

�~2~
POPULATION

Sixty-three consecutive patients referred for electroshock therapy were
studied. The selection of patients for treatment was made by the psychiatric

staff,

independent of the judgment of the authors. The patients ranged in age

from 20 to 66 with a mean of h7, and included 21 men and h2 women.
METHOD

Prior to treatment each patient

was evaluated according

to the following

methods:

1. Structured Family Interviews: Personality was evaluated in interviews with members of the patient's family. At the opening of the interview,
the relative was asked to describe, in his

interests

and

attitudes..

The

relatives

patient's usual
encouraged to talk about any

own

were

words, the

aSpect they wished, and the interviewer followed the trend of

rather than proceeding in a serial fashion.

The

their talk,

interviewer asked questions,

however, to obtain information in 15 Specific areas which have been described

as characteristic of the "explicit verbal denial" personality.
and type of questions required with each

The number

relative varied according to the de-

gree of spontaneous production and the informant's capacity to comprehend and
communicate. The informant was encouraged to give concrete examples of

all

statements.
The

basic items included the presence

features: 1) stress verbal

symbols such as

rationalization; 2) are prestige

and

and

extent of each of the following

resolutions, homilies, cliches

security conscious,

intrinsic benefits of health, work, leisure,

money and

it a

and

and do not enjoy the

property; 3) regard

secret from family

and

neighbors,-and are reluctant to seek medical care; h) "shake off" their

own

illness as

an imperfection or

disgrace, keeping

�-3troubles and are considered practical persons

who

advise others; 5) have

drive and compulsive energy, and are guilty or uneasy

if not

much

occupied; 6) are

conscientious with a high sense of duty and responsibility; 7) are sensitive

it

to criticism, regarding

as an attack on

their integrity;

8) are proud and

avoid help from others; 9) are reserved rather than openly affectionate or
emotional; 10) emphasize being correct; 11) are not imaginative or creative;
12) are not seen as dependent by

their relatives;

13) do not discuss sex

openly; 1h) do not have temper outbursts; 15) and are not ludic (25)

After the interview, each item was rated
score of

O

was given

if

on a

scale of

O, 1

or 2.

A

the aspect was noted to a minimal degree; a score of

1

indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a score of

2

indicated the definite

and marked presence of the

each item were added and the resultant score

pattern.

The

scores for

is termed the "denial personal-

ity score".
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was interviewed prior to and at
weekly intervals during and following the course of treatment. The

evaluation

was determined by

clinical

the patient's behavior in the few weeks follow-

ing the end of the course of treatment and was based

on

the evaluation of the

patient's therapist, the therapist's supervising psychiatrist and the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock treatment unit. Patients
were classed

into three groups:

proved, following the

much improved, moderately improved,

or unimp

criteria outlined previously (6).

3. lgnguagg §t_gy: In addition to the clinical interviews, each patient
was examined

toward his

with a standardized series of questions determining his attitude

illness.

Two

of the questions asked were,

"What

is your

main

trouble?" and ”If you had one wish, what would you wish for?" The patients
were

tested before

and during treatment and the verbatim reSponses were

anal-

ized for changes in language according to the method previously described (7).

�V

«hRESULTS

The

relatives of

scores ranged from

h?

patients

were interviewed.

to 25, with a

O

O

denial personality

statistical

comparison

Patients with scores ranging

from

25 were consiRered the "high denial" group, while those with scores from

to
to

For

median of 11.

the patients were divided into two groups.
11

The

10 were classed as low

in denial tendencies.
Patients with high denial

1. Personality score and clinical reSponse:

personality scores in these family interviews were most likely to

be

as much improved, and only one case was considered unimproved (Table

patients with
a chance

30%

I). In

clinical reSponse rating occurred

low scores, however, the

basis, with

rated
on

of the patients being regarded as unimproved.

I

TAJLE

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical Response to Electroshock
Moderately

Much

Unimproved

Total

9

1

2h

9

7

23

18

8

h?

Improved

Improved

Personality Score

-

25

1h

0 ~ 10

7

11

Total

.

21
The

proved

difference in the cenial scores between the

patients,

significant.

%

when compared

to the

unimproved

much and moderately im-

patients is statistically

Although the much improves patients have a higher mean score

than the moderately improved group, this Jifference is not significant.
2. Qualitative observations:

Although there

is a relationship between

high denial personality scores she the clinical rating,
low

denial scores

* Significant at
‘1

30%

of patients with

were also evaluated as showing a marked improvement. 'Hhile
1%

.0 '
level of coniidence

by HannAWhitney

U

Test.

�-5the group of seven patients
be described.
and

security

is

a small one,

certain

common

characteristics

can

Although these Subjects lack the competitive drive, prestige
ne ds of the high

denial subjects, they

show a

similar lack of

creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically of their own
or other's feelings» They relate to the environment primarily by non-verbal
forms of communication. They are described by

their families as laughing or

crying excessively; and as showing anger by muteness, "go into a shell," "walk
out of the room in a huff," or bv violent tempers with table-pounding, throwing

objects or direct physical assault.

patients are "ludic," - a term used

These

by Heinstein and Kahn (12) to denote comic,

tragic, or melodramatic behavior.*

3.

Personality score and changes in language: Applying the technic of
language analysis described in a previous study (7), the changes in language
in clinical interviews

were compared with

the denial personality scores.

patterns of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or

Nine

symptoms,

displacement, qualification, 323' have been described as characteristically
occurring after electroshock.

As

in the previous study, each patient

was

classified according to the dichotomy of whether or not he showed three or
more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial personality scores
showed a

greater

ality scores
ality scores

number of language changes, than those with low

(Table

II).

The

denial persen-

coefficient of correlation between the person-

and the number of language Chan es

is

+

.71, significant at better

than the 15 level of confidence.

* This terizwas taken from Piaget
behavior of young children (8).

who

pplied

it

to the play

and

imitative

�-6-

II

TABLE

Relation of Denial Personality Dcores to Clinical Language Changes During
Treatment
Number Language Changes

-

0

2

3

or more

Personality Scores
11-25

(20)

8

12

0-10

(20)

17

3

Total

25

15

h. Illustrative Cases:
Case 1.
A

month

High Denial

Personality Score:

élayear-old houswife

was

history of insomnia, abdominal nain

admitted to the hospital with a 15
and

fear of cancer.

she was depressed, retarded, and seclusive, evincing

On

admission

little interest

in her

surroundin s, and uaneering aimlessly about the ward.
The

patient was described

responsible person with
and was unable to
home.

She was

much

relax.

by her husband as a conscientious, dependable,

integrity.

She had no

As a conseguence, she

hobbies, outside interests,

busiee herself with chores

at

"mortallv afraid" of doctors, minimized her illnesses and con-

cealed ailments, even from her husband. Very restrained, she onenly showed
no

affection or emotion, never 6iscusse€ sex

had "a long memory

for

little

"streak of stubborness,"
sible for her mistakes."
than borrow or take

things

and would

if

she

and

felt that

According to the denial

She

she was wronged," a

"just as soon hold another person

She was proud ane would

money from

rarely lost her temper.

"rather

go

reSponu

without food"

others.

criteria, hrr score was

20.

After 20 electroshock treatments, she became euphoric, took an interest
in her personal appearance and participated in hospital

activities.

Her doctor

�-7called her a

"model"

patient

feelings, asserted that
band who was very good

her discharge."

who, "while

reluctant to discuss her personal

difficulties at home, had a wonderful husto her, considered herself lucky and eagerly anticipated
she had no

She was discharged with a

Case 2.

Low

"much improved."

Denial Personality Score:

hl-year-old housewife

A

rating of

was

admitted to the hOSpital with a two

year history of depression following the birth of her fourth child. She cried

frequently, lost interest in social activities, found it increasingly difficult
to take care of her baby and had suicidal thoughts. On admission the patient
was

showed

attention to her personal appearance, cried readily,
psychomotor retardation and was circumstantial in speech.

The
whom
He

little

noted to pay

patient

it was

was described by

her husband as a "negative personality" with

not easy to get along because she was opinionated and argumentative.

regarded her as "completely impractical, with no

common

sense."

She was a

poor housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other people, although not

the kind of person

who would

ative person, she liked to
sations.

When

put herself out for others.

engage

An

excessively talk-

in long, intellectual, pretentious converu

angry, however, she would become either completely mute, or

"very nasty, implying you just don‘t
"cold" person, she was able to

know any

better." Although considered a

talk freely about sex.

She

frequently complained

of physical ailments and went to physicians readily. She was "naive" and "un-

realistic," believing, for

example,

that she had a flair for writing although

others considered her amateurish.

rated as h.

Her

personality score

The

patient received eighteen electroshock treatments, which were term»

inated at her

was

frightened to take any more,,
At the time of her discharge her doctor noted her as "quite depressed," but felt

that

ital.

it was

own

insistence because she

was too

doubtful that she could benefit from further treatment at the hosp-

She was discharged with

the recommendation for continued psychotherapy.

�-8-

.

DISCUSSION

The

structured family interview

was designed

to test the specific

hypo—

thesis derived from earlier observations that patients with the "explicit
verbal denial" personality are most likely to
havioral

Changes

the examiner.

show

both the language and be-

to electroshock therapy which are rated as

The

data supports this hypothesis

and

much improved by

is also consistent with

the theory of the mode of action of electroshock therapy advanced by'Weinstein,

that "....the therapeutic efficacy of
electroconvulsive therapy....derives from the production of a state of brain

Linn and Kahn in 1952 (9).

They suggest

function in which the mechanism of denial

is facilitated in characterologically

disposed individuals."
The degree of

explicit verbal denial is, however, only

aspect affecting the behavioral reaponse to treatment.

one

personality

the basis of the

On

present data and methods of analysis a broader view of personality patterns
in relation to improvement with

rated as clinically
empathic

-

~

improved are

unable to think

EST

is

now

possible.

Those

own

who

are

characterized by such features as: 1) non-

critically or sensitively

about the needs,

ings, or communications of others; 2) non-intrOSpective

critically about their

patients

-

—

feel-

unable to think

feelings or needs; unable to achieve insight even

with the collaboration of others in the psychotherapeutic relationship; 3) rely
heavily on nondverbal Communication

little referential

--

even.when they are

communication, the words being cliched, stereotyped, or

.representative of feelings

and emotions

action and h) highly conventional .. ..

rather than transmitters of informp

withoutimaginative or creativecapacity,

y'and,with few resources to deal with stressful or
With

talkative there is

this pattern as the

common

new

situations.

background, two classes of patients who

"‘respond to treatment can.be-defined: a) the driving,.conscientious, independent,

�.9can be

successful, emotionally-controlled person who

plicit verbal denial" personality type;

b) the chronically inadequate,
coming from an impoverished

ively labile and ludic, dependent person,
cultural background.

characterized as the "ex-

'While both types are

rated as

improved

affectsocio-

in their short

term reSponse to electroshock, preliminary follow-up observations indicate

that the "explicit verbal denial" personality type is more likely to sustain
the clinical reSponse, while the ludic group is likely to relapse quickly.
Consistent with our previous studies

we

have found that altered brain

function is a necessary condition for behavioral change'with electroshock
therapy.

The

kinds of behavioral change

shown with

however, vary marcedly in

different patients.

denial or diSplacement of

symptoms and

paranoid agitated states,

become withdrawn,

altered brain function,

Some show mood

changes and

are rated as improved. Others develop
or

show

ory complaints, and are rated as unimproved. In

additional somatic or

memp

this study we have stressed

the personality factors in those cases whose behavioral reSponse was rated as
improved. We have not considered the patients who were rated as only moder-

ately improved or unimproved. If the basic hypothesis is correct, we should
also find a relationship between personality and the behavioral response in
patients who are rated as unimproved. Present information in this regard is
minimal, as
These

this problem has not been approached with a specific hypothesis.
observations raise questions concerning the relation of personality

to type of mental illness

and choice of therapy.

Clinical observations support

the concept of a characteristic predepressed personality. Abraham (1) noted
of depression occurred in obsessional persons. Arnot (2) describes
that

states

depressions as being overly Conscientious and perfectionistic. Hamilton and
Mann (5), reporting various aSpects of the personality in involutional depress-

ion, include such features as "followed a rigid pattern of behavior....dis~
played a lack of imagination...narrou range of interestS..thorough, conscientious,

�.10..
meticulous devotion to duty...1ack of feeling for point of view of
others...
hard, uncompromising drivers...oversensitive...reserved." Cohen, §t_§l'(3)

in an intensive study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients
as being highly prestige-conscious; little concerned with problems of interpersonal relatedness; stereotyped; conventional; having
communicative interchange; and unaware of

self or of his feelings toward others.
to
be

little

capacity for

other persons' feelings toward him-

They emphasized the

patients' inability

that the therapeutic relationship should
in non-verbal terms rather than emphasizing the intellectual contents of
communicate

verbally

and Suggested

the exchange.

studies of the personality background of depression Show a pattern
that is most similar to those personality aspects whidh have been described
These

as the "explicit verbal denial" personality. The factor of personality could
thus explain the fact that depression is the condition which responds best
to electroshock treatment. The same personality factors which make a
person
susceptible to a depressive reaction are those which make him responsive to
non-verbal forms of therapy.

These

factors enable

him

to reSpond, under the

conditions of altered brain function, with those language and other behavioral
changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same stereotypy, convention-

ality, perfectionism,

and

prestige-consciousness, which produce a catastrophic
response in the individual faced by the loss of a partner, job, business, or

loved one permit the development of denial, minimization and displacement
under the conditions of altered brain function and are deemed "improved" by

the family and the therapist.

�.11SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1.

Personality factors in

63

consecutive patients referred for e1ectro~

shock therapy were studied by means of a structured family interview.

2.
which are

3.
be

The

results

show

that aspects of personality can be differentiated

significantly related to the reaponse to treatment.
The

basic personality pattern of the patients

who respond

characterized as a) non-empathic, b) non-introspective, c)

non-verbally, and d) highly conventional and stereotyped, with

best can

communicate

little imagin-

ative or creative capacity.
h.

‘Within the context of

of improved

personality,

patients.

One

showing such

and emotional

control.

ically inadequate
grounds, uho are

this

group

is

core, there are two main subdivisions
comparable to the "explicit verbal denial"

common

features as drive, conscientiousness, independence

The oﬂaer group

and dependent, coming

consists of persons apt to be chron—
from deprived Socio-cultural back-

effectively labile and ludic.

5. The relationship between these personality patterns and descriptions
of the personality of depressed perSOns

is noted.

The same

personality factors

which contribute to a depressive reaction, contribute to a behavioral change
under the conditions of
which

altered brain function following electroshock therapy

is evaluated as improvement.

�.12..
FERENCES

1. Abraham, K.: Selected Papers on Psychoanalysis. London:
Press Ltd., 19h9.
Arnot, R.:

The

chiat.,

3. Cohen,

h. Fink,

Predepressed Personality,

Zé: 617—618, 1956.

A.M.A. Arch.

The Hogarth

Neurol.

&amp;

Psy-

B., Baker, G., Cohen, R. A., FrommpReichmann, F. and Ueigert,
An Intensive Study of Twelve Cases of Manic-Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiat., 11: 103-137, l95h.
H.

E. V.:
M.

and Kahn, R. L.:

Quantitative Studies of Slow wave Activity
EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., Q; 158, 1956.

Following Electroshock,

Hamilton, D. M. and Mann, W. A.: The Hospital Treatment of Involutional
Psychosos, in Depression (Hoch, P. and Zubin, J., eds.), New York:
Grune &amp; Stratton, 199-209, 1952.

L., Fink, M. and weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.

Kahn, R.

7.

Language During Electroshock
Communication
(Hock, P. and Zubin,
Psychopathology of

Kahn, R. L. and Fink, M.:

Therapy, in

Changes

in

Eds.) in press.

Piaget, J.: Play,

Norton, 19 51.

Dreams and

Imitation in Childhood.

New

J.,

York: N. W.

9. Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R. L.: Psychosis During Electroshock
Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy, Am. J. Pey-

chiat.,

193; 22-26, 1952.

10. ‘Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A. and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Sodium") in Organic Brain Disease, Am. J. Psychiat., 11g} 889-89h, 1953.
11.

E. A. and Kahn, R. L.:
Arch. Neurol. &amp;
A.M.A.
ness,

neinstein,

Personality Factors in Denizl of
Psychiat., éﬁ: 355-367, 1953.

Ill-

12. Ueinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L. and Sugarman, L. A.: Ludic Behavior in
Patients with Brain Disease, J. Hillside Hosp., 2; 98-106, l95h.
13. Ueinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.:

Denial of

siological Aspects. Springfield,

Ill.:

Illness: Symbolic and Phy-

Charles C. Thomas, 1955.

�--.f\

._

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. and

From

Max

Fink,

M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
Aided by grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental
Health, National Institutes of Health, United States Public
Health Service.
Presented to the Electroshock Research Association, Chicago,
May

5/59

195”.

�INTRODUCTION

.The behavioral response of patients receiving electro—
shock therapy is variable. In previous studies of the

factors related to this variability we noted that patients
who showed early, persistent and relatively marked degrees
of altered brain function, as measured by the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital
most

likely to

show a

test for brain disease (10),

clinical response

were

rated as
investigation

which was

present study is an
of the role of personality in the behavioral response.
An eXplicit hypothesis concerning this relationship has
been derived from previous studies of the patterns of
behavioral change occurring with EST. In an analysis of
language changes after electroshock (7), we reported that

improved (h) (6) (7).

The

develop such language patterns as explicit
denial of illness; personal, spatial and temporal displacement
of symptoms; and qualification, evasion and minimization
are rated as improved. These language patterns are similar
to those previously described by Weinstein and Kahn (13)
in their studies of neurological patients with cerebral
dysfunction. They characterized this behavior as the

patients

who

"language of denial" and demonstrated a relationship to
personality. In particular they described the characteristics
of the "explicit verbal denial" personality (11). On the

basis of these observations, the hypothesis

was advanced

that

�-2-

closely approximated this "explicit
verbal denial" personality type would be more likely to
those patients
show

who most

the behavioral changes after

EST

which are rated as

improved.

purpose of the present study, therefore, was to
determine:
The

-

1) whether personality characteristics related to the
behavioral response to electroshock therapy can be differ-

entiated;

and

2) whether

patients with greater "denial" tendencies

are more likely to show behavioral changes after electroshock
therapy which are rated as improved.
EQPULATION:

Sixty-three consecutive patients referred for electroshock therapy were studied. The selection of patients for
treatment was made by the psychiatric staff, independent
of the judgment of the authors. The patients ranged in age
from 20 to 66 with a mean of h7, and included 21 men and h2
women.
METHOD

Prior to treatment each patient

was

evaluated according

to the following methods:

Structured Family Interviews: Personality was
evaluated in interviews with members of the patient's
family. At the opening of the interview, the relative was
1.

�-3asked to describe, in his

interests

and

attitudes.

own

words, the

The

relatives

patient's usual
were encouraged

to

aspect they wished, and the interviewer
followed the trend of their talk, rather than proceeding
in a serial fashion. The interviewer asked questions,
however, to obtain information in 15 specific areas which
have been described as characteristic of the "eXplicit
verbal denial" personality. The number and type of questions
required with each relative varied according to the degree
of spontaneous production and the informant's capacity to

talk about

any

comprehend and communicate.

The

informant was encouraged to

give concrete examples of all statements.
The basic items included the presence and extent of
1) stress verbal symbols
each of the following features:

resolutions, homilies, cliches and rationalization;
2) are prestige and security conscious, and do not enjoy the
intrinsic benefits of health, work, leisure, money and
such as

regard illness as an imperfection or disgrace,
keeping it a secret from family and neighbors, and are
reluctant to seek medical care; h) "shake off" their own
troubles and are considered practical persons who advise
5) have much drive and compulsive energy,.and are
others;
guilty or uneasy if not occupied; 6) are conscientious

property;

3)

with a high sense of duty and responsibility; 7) are
sensitive to criticism, regarding it as an attack on their

�-u-

integrity; 8) are

proud and avoid help from others;

9) are

reserved rather than openly.af£ectionate or emotuonal;
10) emphasize being

correct; 11) are not imaginative or

creative; 12) are not seen as dependent

by

their relatives;

not discuss sex openly; 1h) do not have temper
outbursts; 15) and are not ludic (25).
After the interview, each item was rated on a scale of
0, 1 or 2. A score of O was given if the aspect was noted

13)

do

to a minimal degree; a score of 1 indicated that the characteristic was moderately present; while a score of 2 indicated
the definite and marked presence of the pattern. The scores

for each item were added and the resultant scoretns termed
the "denial personality score".
2. Clinical Evaluation: Each patient was interviewed
prior to and at weekly intervals during and following the
course of treatment. The clinical evaluation was determined
by the

patient's behavior in the

few weeks following the end

of the course of treatment and was based on the evaluation
of the patient's therapist, the therapist’s supervising
psychiatrist and the supervising psychiatrist in charge of
the electroshock treatment unit.

into three groups:

much improved,

unimproved, following the

Patients

were

classed

moderately improved, or

criteria outlined previously (6).

Study; In addition to the clinical inter~
views, each patient was examined with a standardized series
3. Language

�-5of questions determining his attitude toward his illness.
Two of the questions asked were, "What is your main trouble?"

"If you had one wish, what would you wish for?" The
patients were tested before and during treatment and the
verbatim responses were analyzed for changes in language
and

according to the method previously described (7).

�-6RESULTS

relatives of

interviewed. The
denial personality scores ranged from O to 25, with a median
of 11. For statistical comparison the patients were divided
into two groups. Patients with scores ranging from 11 to 25
were considered the "high denial" group, while those with
scores from O to 10 were classed as low in denial tendencies.
1. Personality score and clinical response: Patients
with high denial personality scores in these family interviews
The

likely to

were most

patients

h?

rated as

be

were

only one
case was considered unimproved (Table I). In patients with
low scores, however, the clinical response rating occurred
on a chance basis, with 30% of the patients being regarded as
much improved, and

unimproved.
TABLE

I

Relation of Denial Personality to Clinical Response
to Electroshock

Much

Moderately

25

1h

9

1

2h

to 10
Total

7

9

7

23

21

18

8

h?

Improved

Improved

Total

Unimproved

Personality Score
11
0

to

The

difference in the denial scores between the

and moderately improved

unimproved
*

patients,

when compared

much

to the

patients is statistically significant.* Although

Significant at

1%

level of confidence

by Mann-Whitney

U

Test.

�-7the much improved patients have a higher mean score than
the moderately improved group, this difference is not

significant.
Qualitative observations: Although there is a
relationship between high denial personality scores and the
clinical rating, 30% of patients with low denial scores were
also evaluated as showing a marked improvement. While the
2.

group of seven

patients is

characteristics

a small one,

can be described.

certain

common

Although these subjects

lack the competitive drive, prestige and security needs of
the high denial subjects, they show a similar lack of
creative or imaginative capacity or ability to think critically
of their own or other's feelings. They relate to the environment

primarily

by non-verbal forms of communication.

They

are described by their families as laughing or crying
excessively; and as showing anger by muteness, "go into a
shell," "walk out of the room in a huff," or by violent
tempers with table—pounding, throwing objects or direct

physical assault.

These

patients are "ludic," -

by Weinstein and Kahn (12)

a term used

to denote comic, tragic, or

melodramatic behavior.*
3.

Personality score

and changes in language:

Applying

the technic of language analysis described in a previous study
(7), the changes in language in clinical interviews were

the denial personality scores. Nine patterns
of language change, such as explicit denial of illness or

compared with

* This

and

term was taken from Piaget

imitative behavior of

young

applied it to the play
children (8).

who

�-8displacement, qualification, 323. have been
described as characterically occurring after electroshock.
As in the previous study, each patient was classified
according to the dichotomy of whether or not he showed three
or more explicit language changes. Patients with high denial
symptoms,

personality scores

showed a

greater number of language changes,

personality scores (Table II).
The coefficient of correlation between the personality scores
and the number of language changes is + .71, significant at
better than the 1% level of confidence.
than those with low denial

TABLE

II

Relation of Denial Personality Scores to Clinical
Language Changes During Treatment

Number Language Changes
0 - 2

Personality Scores
11-25
0-10

(20)
(20)

'

Total
h.

Illustrative

3

or more

8

12

1?

3

25

15

Cases:

gigh Denial Personality Score;
A 61-year-old housewife was admitted to the
hospital with a 15 month history of insomnia, abdominal pain
and fear of cancer. On admission she was depressed, retarded,
and seclusive, evincing little interest in her surroundings,
Case 1.

aimlessly about the ward.
The patient was described by her husband as a
conscientious, dependable, responsible person with

and wandering

much

�-9-

integrity.

hobbies, outside interests, and was
a consequence, she busied herself with

She had no

unable to relax. As
chores at home. She was “mortally afraid" of doctors,
minimized her illnesses and concealed ailments, even from
her husband.

Very

restrained,

she openly showed no

affection

rarely lost her temper. She
had "a long memory for little things if she felt that she was
wronged," a "streak of stubborness," and would "just as soon hold
or emotion, never discussed sex and

another person reaponsible for her mistakes." She was proud and
would "rather go without food" than borrow or take money from

others.
According to the denial

criteria,

her score was 20.

electroshock treatments, she became euphoric,
took an interest in her personal appearance and participated in
hospital activities. Her doctor called her a "model" patient
who, "while reluctant to discuss her personal feelings, asserted
After

that she

20

had no

difficulties at

home, had a

wonderful husband

very good to her, considered herself lucky and eagerly
anticipated her discharge." She was discharged with a rating

who was

of "much improved."

Denial Personality Score:
A hl-year—old housewife was admitted to the hospital
with a two year history of depression following the birth of
her fourth child. She cried frequently, lost interest in social
aetivities, found it increasingly difficult to take care of her
Case 2.

Low

suicidal thoughts. On admission the patient was
noted to pay little attention to her personal appearance, cried
baby and had

�readily,

showed psychomotor

retardation

and was

circumstantial

in speech.

patient was described by her husband as a "negative
personality" with whom it was not easy to get along because
The

she was

opinionated and argumentative.

He

regarded her as

"completely impractical, with no common sense." She was a
poor housekeeper, constantly demanding help from other people,
although not the kind of person who would put herself out for

others.

excessively talkative person, she liked to engage
in long, intellectual, pretentious conversations. When angry,
An

either completely mute, or "very
Just don't know any better." Although

however, she would become

nasty, implying you

considered a "cold" person, she was able to talk freely about
sex. She frequently complained of physical ailments and went
to physicians readily. She was "naive" and "unrealistic,"
believing, for example, that she had a flair for writing although
others considered her amateurish.

personality score was rated as h.
The patient received eighteen electroshock treatments,
which were terminated at her own insistence because she was
Her

too frightened to take any more. At the time of her discharge
her doctor noted her as "quite depressed," but felt that it

doubtful that she could benefit from further treatment at
the hospital. She was discharged with the recommendation for

was

continued psychotherapy.

�-11-

Elialﬁilgli

structured family interview was designed to test
the specific hypothesis derived from earlier observations
that patients with the "explicit verbal denial" personality
The

are most likely to show both the language and behavioral
changeswﬁﬂxelectroshock therapy which are rated as much

data supports this hypothesis
and is also consistent with the theory of the mode of action
of electroshock therapy advanced by Weinstein, Linn and Kahn
in 1952 (9). They suggest that "....the therapeutic efficacy
of electroconvulsive therapy....derives from the production
of a state of brain function in which the mechanism of denial
improved by the examiner.

The

is facilitated in characterologically disposed individuals."
degree of eXplicit verbal denial is, however,
only one personality aspect affecting the behavioral response
to treatment. 0n the basis of the present data and methods
The

of analysis a broader view of personality patterns in relation
to improvement with EST is now possible. These patients who
are rated as clinically improved are characterized by such
features as: l) non-empathic - - unable to think critically
or sensitively about the needs, feelings, or communications
of others; 2) non-introspective ~ - unable to think critically
about their own feelings or needs; unable to achieve insight
even with the collaboration of others in the psychotherapeutic

rely heavily on non-verbal communication they are talkative there is little referential

relationship;
even when

3)

-

�-12communication, the words being cliched, stereotyped, or

representative of feelings and emotions rather than transmitters of information and h) highly conventional - - without
imaginative or creative capacity, and with few resources to
deal with stressful or
With

new

situations.

this pattern as the

common

background, two classes

patients who respond to treatment can be defined: a) the
driving, conscientious, independent, successful, emotionallycontrolled person who can be characterized as the "explicit
verbal denial" personality type; b) the chronically
inadequate, effectively labile and ludic, dependent person,
coming from an impoverished sociocultural background. While
both types are rated as improved in their short term response
to electroshock, preliminary follow-up observations indicate
that the "explicit verbal denial" personality type is more
likely to sustain the clinical response, while the ludic group
is likely to relapse quickly.
of

Consistent with our previous studies we have found that
altered brain function is a necessary condition for behavioral
change with electroshock therapy. The kinds of behavioral change
slacwn with altered brain function, however, vary markedly in
different patients. Some show mood changes and denial or
displacement of symptoms and are rated as improved. Others
develop paranoid

agitated states,

withdrawn, or show
additional somatic or memory complaints, and are rated as
unimproved. In this study we have stressed the personality
become

�-13-

factors in those cases
as improved.

We

whose

behavioral response

have not considered the

patients

was

rated

who were

rated as only moderately improved or unimproved. If the
basic hypothesis is correct, we should also find a relation~
ship between personality and the behavioral reSponse in
patients who are rated as unimproved. Present information in

this regard is

minimal, as

this

problem has not been approached

with a specific hypothesis.

observations raise questions concerning the relation
of personality to type of mental illness and choice of therapy.
Clinical observations support the concept of a characteristic
These

predepressed personality. Abraham (I) noted that states of
depression occurred in obsessional persons. Arnot (2)
describes depressions as being overly conscientious and perfectionistic. Hamilton and Mann (5), reporting various aspects
of the personality in involutional depression, include such

features as "followed a rigid pattern of behavior.... diaplayed
a lack of imagination... narrow range of interests.. thorough,
conscientious, meticulous devotion to duty...lack of feeling
for point of view of others...hard, uncompromising drivers...

intensive
study of manic-depressive psychosis, reported their patients

oversensitive...reserved."

Cohen, sﬂngg (3) in an

as being highly prestige-conscious;
problems of

little

concerned with

interpersonal relatedness; stereotyped; conventional;

little

capacity for communicative interchange; and
unaware of other persons’ feelings toward himself or of his

having

�~1h-

feelings toward others;

They emphasized the

inability to

verbally

communicate

therapeutic relationship should

be

patients'

that the
in non-verbal terms rather

and suggested

than emphasizing the intellectual contents of the exchange.
These studies of the personality background of depression
show a pattern that is most similar to those personality

"explicit verbal
personality. The factor of personality could thus
the fact that depression is the condition which responds
electroshock treatment. The same personality factors
which make a person susceptible to a depressive reaction are
aspects
denial"
explain
best to

which have been described as the

those which make him responsive to non-verbal forms of therapy.
These factors enable him to respond, under the conditions of
altered brain function, with those language and other behavioral
changes which are evaluated as improved. Thus, the same

stereotypy, conventionality, perfectionism, and prestigeconsciousness, which produce a catastrOphic response in the
individual faced by the loss of a partner, job, business, or
loved one permit the development of denial, minimization and
displacement under the conditions of altered brain function
and are deemed "improved" by the family and the therapist.

�-15SQMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1. Personality factors in 63 consecutive patients
referred for electroshock therapy were studied by means of
a structured family interview.
2. The results show that aspects of personality can be
differentiated which are significantly related to the reSponse
.

to treatment.

basic personality pattern of the patients who
respond best can be characterized as a) non-empathic,
b) non-introspective, c) communicate non-verbally, and
d) highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imaginative
or creative capacity.
h. Within the context of this common core, there are
two main subdivisions of improved patients. One group is
comparable to the Wkplicit verbal denial" personality, showing
such features as drive, conscientiousness, independence and
emotional control. The other group consists of persons apt to
3.

The

chronically inadequate and dependent, coming from deprived
sociocultural backgrounds, who are effectively labile and Indie.
5. The relationship between these personality patterns and
descriptions of the personality of depressed persons is noted.
The same personality factors which contribute to a depressive
reaction, contribute to a behavioral change under the conditions
of altered brain function following electroshock therapy which
is evaluated as improvement.
be

�116REFERENCES

1.

Abraham, K.: SelecteguPaﬁers on
The Hogarth Press Ltd.,‘l9h9.

2.

Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
and Psychiat., 1g: 617f618, 1956.
Cohen, M.B., Baker, 6., Cohen, R.A., Fromm-Reichmann, F.
and Weigert, E.V.: Antintensive Study of Twelve Cases
Psychosis, Psychiat., 11: 103-137,
1ofsﬁanic-Depressive
9

3.

Psychoanalysis. London:

5

o

R.L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave
Activity Following Elastroshock, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol.,
g: 158, 1956.

Fink,

M.

Hamilton,

and Kahn,

The_Hospita1 Treatment of

D.M. and Mann, W.A.:

Involutional Ps choseg, in Depression (Hash,

J.,
6.

933.5,

New

Stratton,

FT and

Zubin,

199-209, 1952.

and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of
Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electroshock,

Kahn, R.L., Fink,
A.M.A. Arch.

7.

York: Grune E
M.

Neurol.

&amp;

Egychiat., lé‘ 23-29, 1956.

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electro—
shock Therapy, in Psychopathology of Communication (Hoch,
Zubin, J., eds.) New York: Grune &amp; Stratton, 1958,
P.6and
12 ~139.
ﬁ

J.: Play)
York: W.W.

Piaget,
9.

Norton,

l9Sl.

Imitation in Childhood.

New

Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During
Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of
Shock Therapy,

10.

Dreams and

Am.

J. Psychiat., 109: 22-26, 1952.

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, L.:
Diagnostic Use of Amobarbitai Sodium ("Amytal Sodium")
Am.
inSOrganic Brain Disease, ""‘ J. Psychiat., 112: 889-89h,
19 3.

11;

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.:’Personality Factors in
Denial of Illness, A.M.A. ArCh. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., £2:
355-367, 1953.

12:

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Sugarman, L.A.* Ludic
Behavior in Patients with Brain Disease, J. Hillside Hosp.
2: 98-106, 195h.
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic
and Physiological Aspects. Springfiél’, 111.: Charles
i

13.

UT

Thomas, 1955.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2724">
                <text>Personality factors in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. J Neuropsychiatr. 1959 Sep-Oct; 1:45-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2725">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2726">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-41-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2727">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2728">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2729">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2730">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2731">
                <text>Two [preprints] and one reprint. Reprint fromJournal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol.I, No.1, Sept-Oct. 1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2732">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2733">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74475">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81036">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87597">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94158">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="292" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6557">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9a3312b18cdf6e7ffc1390135fa8f24f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7ebf0740040bf69f9525e1f11a533ee3</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107162">
                    <text>20

Soci0psychological A3pects
of Psychiatric Treatment
A Report of Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals
ROBERT L. KAHN, PhD, NEW YORK; MAX FINK, MD, ST. LOUIS;
AND NATHANIEL SIEGEL, PhD, BETHESDA, MD

IN THEIR STUDIES of the New Haven

treated primarily by psychotherapy, and repsychiatric patient population, Hollingshead ceived poorer discharge ratings. These
and Redlich reported signiﬁcant relation— clinical factors were also related to a measscale.""5
California
F
the
of
in
the
individual’s
stereotypy,
ure
position
ships between an
social—class structure and the incidence of
Higher F scores, ie, greater stereotypy, were
treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders, often found in patients diagnosed as inand kinds and duration of psychiatric treat— volutional psychosis who were referred for
ment administered.1 The inﬂuence of the convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
economic status of the patient on the avail- periods, and were more often rated as much
recovered.
improved
or
of
however,
was
personnel,
treating
ability
It was suggested that differences in psy—
not excluded.
should
chiatric
hospitals
treatment
in
the
social
factors
of
among
Studies of the role
social
factors
of
inﬂuence
in—
similar
reﬂect
a
of
hospitalized patients
treatment
Hos—
Hillside
within
noted
for
patients
dependent of their ﬁnancial status and the as
decided
it
to
this
To
was
test
suggestion
pital.
undertaken
of
treatments were
availability
1957
Hillside
the
of
the
procedures
1957.
employ
this
In
in
hospital,
at Hillside Hospital
Hosinstitutions—Hillside
in
three
instudy
a variety of treatment modes, including
dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, pital, the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hosand convulsive therapies were available to all pital, Topeka, Kan, and the Massachusetts
inThese
Boston.
Health
Mental
Center,
patients regardless of their ability to pay.
In our surveys 2'3 we observed that patients stitutions were selected with the expectation
hospitalized for the shortest periods were that diverse treatment modalities were
older, had less education, and were more equally available to populations of different
often of foreign birth. These older, less- social classes. Each provided short—term
educated patients were predominantly treated treatment of voluntary patients and did not
by convulsive therapy and received more provide custodial care. Each is a residency
favorable clinical discharge ratings. In con- training center with a full—time supervisory
trast, younger, native—born, more—educated staff and active research units, emphasizing
patients were hospitalized for longer periods, psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy.
This study was designed to determine the
Submitted for publication June 21, 1965.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
in—
three
the
of
characteristics
population
Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, NY 1959-1962. Currently
at the Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago,
social
with
class,
to
stitutions
age,
respect
the
of
at
the
Psychiatry
Department
Chicago (Dr. Kahn);
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry, University of Missouri
and F score; and to relate these
education,
School of Medicine, St. Louis (Dr. Fink); and the National
characteristics to treatment variables of type
Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr. Siegel).
Reprint requests to 5400 Arsenal St, St. Louis, Mo 63139
of
duration
of
hospitalization,
treatment,
(Dr. Fink).
'

Arch Gen Psychial—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�EPIDEMIOLOGY—DUNHAM
Small City,” in Epidemiology of Mental Disorder,
B. Pasamanick (ed), \Vashington, DC.: American
Association for the Advancement of Science, 1959,
publication No. 60.
46. Hollingshead, AB, and Redlich, F.: Social
Class and Mental Illness ew York: John Wiley
&amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
47. Morris, ].N.:
ealth and Social Class, Laneet 12303—305 (F
1959.
48. Dunham,
Dis—
“Anomie
and
Mental
..
order,” in Anom and Deviant Behavior, M. B.
Clinard (ed.), Ne
k: The Free Press of
Glencoe, a division of the
acmillan Co., 1964.
49. Buck, C.; Wanklin, M.; and Hobbs, G.E.:
Symptom Analysis of Ru l—Urban Differences in
First Admission Rates, ] erv Ment Dis 122 280-82,

].A., and Kohn, M.L.: Social Isolation and Schizophrenia, Amer Soc Rev 20:265—
58. Clausen,

273 (June) 1955.
59. Stein, L.: Social Class Gradient in Schizo-

phrenia, Brit J Prev Soc Med 11:181-195 (Oct)

1957.
60. Carstairs, G.M., and Brown, G.\V.: A Census

.

(July) 1955.

M.B.: Al native Hypothesis for the
Explanation of Some f Faris and Dunham’s Re—
sults, Amer J Soc 47 48-52 (July) 1941.
51. Schroeder, C.
: Mental Disorders in Cities,
Amer Soc 47 :40-47 (
1942.
52. @degaard, (3.: E igration and Insanity:
Study of Mental Diseas Among Norwegian Born
Population in Minnes , Aeta Psychiat Neural,
50. Owen,

suppl 4, 1932.
53. @degaard,
Incidence of Psychoses
0.31m
in Various Occupations,
Soc Psychiat, vol 2,
No. 2 (Autumn) 1956.
54. Ekblad, M.; Psychiat c and Sociologic
‘

19

,

of Psychiatric Cases in Two Contrasting Communities, J Ment 5 '
72—81 (Jan) 1956.
61. Dunha r
.W.: Community and Schizo—
phrenia :
Epidemiological Analysis, Detroit:
Wayne Sta University Press, 1965.
63. Leig

lot: Comm
Psychiatry,

,

lisher, 1960.
64. Leigh
ger, New Y.
65. LClgh
the Epidemi
demiology
bank Memori
b

,

.H.: “A Proposal for Research in
y of Psychiatric Disorders,” in Epi—
ental Disorder, New York: Mil‘

o

Fund, 1950, pp 128-135.
66. Krame M.; “Discussion of H. W. Dunham’s article”. 'n Causes of Mental Disorders: A
Review of
miologieal Knowledge, 1959,
New York: Milban
emorial Fund, pp 271—273,
1961.
67. Miles, H.C., et

A Cumulative Survey of
All Psychiatric Expe nce in Monroe County, New
York: Summary of ata for the First Year (1960),
Psychiat Quart 3| ‘ 58-487 (July) 1964.
68. Dohrenw , B., and Dohrenwend, B.: The
Problem of Valio
in Field Studies of Psychological Disorder, ] Abn
Psyehol 70 :52-59, 1965.
69. Benedict, P.R., nd Jacks, I.: Mental Illness
in Primitive Societie Psychiatry 17 :379—390 (Nov)
.

.

’

E.: Mental
Ment Hyg (April) 1935.
55. \Vinston,

M.; Compa t e Study of Disease
Incidence in Admissions to ase Psychiatric Hospi—
tal in Middle East, Men
ei 922118—127 (Jan)
56. Simms,

1946.
57. JaCo,

E.G.: The Social Isolation Hypothesis
and Schizophrenia, Amer Soe Re-zv 19:567-577
(Oct) 1954.

1954.

70. Hollowell,

Philadelphia
1955.

:

.A.: Culture and Experience,
niversity of Pennsylvania Press,

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

diagnosis, and discharge evaluation among
the institutions.

Method
A census of all voluntary, adult patients in residence in the institutions was undertaken in January

While Menninger and Hillside Hospitals had
voluntary patients only, a small number of those at
the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC)
were assigned by the courts for psychiatric evalua—
tion or were members of a chronic schizophrenic
state hospital group transferred for a speciﬁc research project. These patients were excluded from
the study because of their nonvoluntary status.
The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census day.
Eighteen months later the records of discharged
patients were examined to determine the social and
psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of
social class, the Hollingshead two-factor index—a
weighted score of education and occupation—was
used.“’6 The study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger, and 95 at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
The study included examination of the relations of
the social to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between institutions. These
comparisons were difﬁcult, however, because of vari—
1959.

ous methodological differences discussed below.
These difﬁculties were most marked in the intrahos—
pital comparisons and accordingly, in the analyses
of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on

the differences between institutions with citation of
intrainstitutional trends. These difﬁculties also led
to missing information for some data, reﬂected in
the tables by the varying population sample sizes.

Results
I. Methodological Problems—When

re—

porting studies from one institution, the
structure of the hospital is taken for granted
and either ignored or mentioned brieﬂy. In
TABLE

1.—Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses
Depressive reaction, narcissistic
personality
Anxiety reaction, narcissistic
personality
Narcissistic personality
Narcissistic personality, alcoholism, chronic infantile
personality
Passive aggressive personality,
alcoholism
Infantile personality, schizophrenic reaction, schizoaiicctive

type

General Classiﬁcation
Psychoneurosis
Psychoneurosis

Personality trait disturbance
Sociopathic personality
disturbance
Sociopathic personality

disturbance

Schizophrenic psychosis

21

gathering comparable data from multiple in—
stitutions, however, the differences between
institutions are accentuated. While these in—
stitutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research, and treatment programs,
they were functionally unlike in ways which
inﬂuenced the data of the study. Speciﬁc
differences were prominent in the designa—
tion of type of treatment, diagnostic classiﬁcations, and the evaluation of treatment
outcome.

Designation of Type of Treatment:
The criteria for designating that a patient
,
received “psychotherapy’ differed among
the institutions, making comparisons (lif—
1.

ﬁcult.

At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy
was designated as treatment administered on
a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist
for which the patient was charged a fee.
Sessions with a psychiatric resident physi—
cian were considered part of routine ad—
ministrative patient care.
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was
deﬁned as treatment sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities
to supervising resident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center psychotherapy was designated as the
activity of many disciplines—psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers,
nurses, and medical students. Formal
records of such sessions were not routinely
included in the patient’s record and to
ascertain which patients received psycho—
therapy it was necessary for members of the
study team to interview the resident physi—
cian responsible for each case.
2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional di—
agnostic styles made comparisons difﬁcult.
At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended
by the American Psychiatric Association,
while both Hillside and MMHC followed
different unitary systems. Several examples
of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table 1, with our suggested conversions into
categories comparable to that of the other
two institutions. These conversions provide
a source of distortion.

Arch Gen Psychz'al—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

22

Discharge Ratings of Improvement:
Ratings of improvement at the three hos—
pitals varied in format and detail. The discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was
tripartite with a separate evaluation for
social, characterological, and syndrome
changes. Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difﬁcult to assess the contribution of each factor of the Menninger
system (Table 2). For this study the
Menninger syndrome rating was compared
to the global ratings of the other institutions.
II. Interhospital Comparisons—1. Sociopsychological Variables: The distribution of
the variables of social class, age, education,
and California F scale score among the three
institutions is presented in Table 3.
A. Social Class. The anticipated differ—
ence in social class composition of the three
institutions was observed. At Menninger
Hospital the population was predominantly
upper class; at Hillside Hospital, middle
class; and at Massachusetts Mental Health
Center, predominantly lower class.
B. Age. There were no differences in age
distribution in the institutional populations.
C. Education. The populations also differed in educational attainment, with patients
having more years of education at Men—
ninger Hospital than at Massachusetts
Mental Health Center. While 41% of the
patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32% at Hillside and 23% at
Menninger did not graduate.
D. F Score. Differences in the distribution of scores on the California F scale were
also observed. Fifty-one percent of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and
only 8% with scores of 50 or above—the
higher F scores being associated with higher
degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside 31% of the patients had F scores below
30 while at MMHC only 20% were be-

2.—Comparative Ratings of Clinical
Condition at Time of Hospital Discharge

TABLE

3.

low 30.

Menninger Hospital

Thus, differences in social class,
tional attainment, and performance on the F
scale were observed. These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating socio—
psychological factors to the treatment
variables among these institutions.
2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables: A.

MM HC

Improved

Recovered
Much improved

Unimproved

Improved

Social adjustment

Character structure

Recovered

Markedly
improved
Moderately
improved
Slightly improved
Unimproved

Unimproved

Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome
Complete remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Selection of Treatment. Among the institu—
tions, signiﬁcantly fewer patients at
Menninger Hospital (43%) received somatic

therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC
(68%) (Table 4).
B. Duration of Hospitalization. The three
institutions differed with regard to patient’s
length of stay (Table 4). Patients at Men—
ninger Hospital were hospitalized longest,
with 65% of the patients remaining for 12
months or more, compared to 31% of the
Hillside patients and only 5% at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The
modal stay of the Hillside group was beComparison: for
'Sociopsychological Variables

TABLE 3.——Interhospital
'

Hillside
Hospital

Menninger
Hospital

N

87
31 %

I

II
III

Social class
l

17

13
28
28

O

5

20-39

40+

x2=

N

&lt;12

12-15

16+

121.5,

df =

3.9,

dr=

4,

100
23 %
54
23

x2 = 9.7, df = 4,

[

F score

{
I

N

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

x2

51

P

%

41
8

= 39.2, (if =

&lt;0.001.
173
19 %
58
23

95
15 %
52
33

173
32 %
51
17

91
41

P: NS

92

10-29
30-49
50-70

L

P

8,

100
19 %
59
22

&lt;20

education

28

V

=

72
3%

2O

1

x2

M M HC

51

IV

N
Age

133
7%

34
34

L

Years of

educa—

Hillside
Hospital

4,

P

%

49
10

&lt;0.05
163
33 %
50
17

&lt;0.001

76
20 %
38
42

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL
TABLE

4.—Inicrhospital Diﬁ‘ercnccs in Treatment
Variables
Menninger Hillside
Hospital Hospital MMIIC
100

Ty pe of
treatment

Psychotherapy
[

Duration of
hospitalization

Somatic
Other

21%
43
36

x2=82.,8 df=4, P &lt;0.001
NMo

&lt;7

Mo
&gt;11 M0
7- 11

100
22 %
13
65

x3=90.,6 df=4,

P

RecoveNred,1 %
evaluation

much1m-

proved
Improved
Unimproved

x2=29.3, df=

N

Discharge
diagnosis

80
19

4,

89
24 %
68
8

173
27 %
42
31

67 %
27

172
23 %

88
28 %

5

5

P

62
15

61

171
52
22

S5
54

10

&lt;0001

95
43 %
5

Schizophrenia
Affective
psychosis
Psychoneurosis 52
&amp; personality disorder
xa = 23.8, df = 4, P &lt;0.001

%

%

17

26

29

tween 7 and 11 months while two thirds
of the MMHC patients were discharged
within six months of hospitalization.
C. Discharge Evaluation. In each hospital,
most patients were evaluated at the time of
discharge as “improved” (Table 4). At
Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of patients were rated as
“unimproved” and only a single patient was
scored “recovered” or “much improved.”
The highest percentage of “recovered” or
“much improved” ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of “unimproved” (10%)
were found at the Massachusetts Mental
Health Center.
D. Diagnosis. For statistical analysis
three diagnostic groupings were made:
TABLE

5.—Duration of Hospitalization, by Age

Percentage of Age Group Staying Over One Year
Age

Below 20
20-29
30—39

40-49

50+

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

81
73
61
30
36

42

14
6
6
0
0

36
30
20
0

schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psy—
choneurosis and personality disorders (Table
4). The diagnostic proportions of patients
within these groups were similar for Hill—
side and MMHC, as slightly more than half
were diagnosed as schizophrenia and one
quarter as psychoneurosis or affective dis—
order. In contrast, at Menninger Hospital
psychoneurosis and personality disorder ac—
counted for more than 50% of the popu—
lation.

III. Intrahospital Comparisons—The lack

&lt;0.001

99

Discharge

173
36 %
64
—

23

of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each
institution, and the limited sample size
(several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than ﬁve cases) precluded signiﬁcant
intrahospital comparisons. However, the
trends appeared similar to those found in the
earlier study. Age and F score were found
related to the selection of treatment at Men—
ninger Hospital (older and higher F score
patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological
age were related at both the Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals—the younger patients re—
maining for the longest periods. While such
relationships were signiﬁcant in these two
hospitals, a similar trend was noted at the
MMHC (Table 5) where no patients over
40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20
remained longer than a year.

Comment
The patients of three voluntary psychiatric
hospitals exhibited signiﬁcant interinstitutional differences in social class and years
of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the
treatment variables—duration of hospital—
ization, selection of treatments, and dis—
tributions of diagnoses and discharge
evaluations.7 Expectations based on our
earlier intra-Hillside Hospital study were
conﬁrmed. The institution serving upperclass patients did have the longest duration
of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower proportion of
patients receiving somatic forms of therapy,
and the poorest discharge ratings among the

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�24

SOCIOPS‘YCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

three institutions. Similarly, the institution

serving lower—class patients did have the
shorter periods of hospitalization, lower
proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and
the better discharge evaluations.
It is our impression that these differences
in psychiatric treatment are related more to
differences in staff attitudes and social class
variables than psychiatric differences in
populations. The contrasts between in—
stitutions in duration of hospitalization are
great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, deﬁni—
tions of psychotherapy, and the details and
amount of recorded data. While these
stylistic differences may be dismissed as
idiosyncratic, they follow a pattern related
to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater de—
pendence on social class variables than
ordinarily acknowledged.
Such population and treatment variable
relationships are interactive processes, de—
termined both by the attitude of the physician and the administrative staff and by the
constellation of symptoms or history which
patients present. Such relationships are
marked most in those psychiatric conditions
where diagnostic criteria are least speciﬁc, ie,
where objective criteria deﬁning diseases of
known etiology are absent, as in schizo—
phrenia, psychoneurosis, personality and be—
havior disorders. Under these conditions of
perceptual and situational ambiguity, the ob—
server’s attitudes and expectations become
signiﬁcant aspects of his perceptions, classi—
ﬁcations, and decisions. A similar situation
was clearly documented by Pasamanick
et al 7 in their study of variations in
diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at
random to different wards (lid not differ in
type of admission, marital status, education,
age, or residence. Signiﬁcant differences did
occur, however, in the incidence of various
diagnostic classiﬁcations among the three
wards and among three administrators on
one ward. As no differences in the popula—
tions were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reﬂect the
attitudes of the examiners.

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis
and clinical evaluation have little meaning
when transferred from one institution to another. Literal adherence to these concepts
produces paradoxical results. For example,
Menninger Hospital with more highly
trained personnel conducting treatment,
keeps its patients for the longest time, has
the fewest patients diagnosed as schizo—
phrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treat—
ment results. At MMHC, in contrast, which
is most inclusive in deﬁning a therapist,
keeps patients for the shortest periods, and
has a higher proportion of the population
classed as schizophrenia, reports the best
treatment results.
In the absence of independent criteria for
the quality of care or the assessment of com—
parability of populations for degree of ill—
ness among the institutions, these ﬁndings
do not reﬂect the relative therapeutic
efﬁcacy of the institutions. Since the evalua—
tions are based on the institution’s own
ratings, we believe that the differences reﬂect
variations in the criteria used for evaluation
of improvement rather than intrinsic psy—
chiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study3 it was
postulated that different criteria of improve—
ment were utilized for persons of different
social background. It was suggested that the
higher the person’s social background the
more complex the criteria employed. This
has been literally conﬁrmed in the present
study, with the staff of Menninger Hospital
using a tripartite rating compared to the
global rating of the other two institutions.
Even considering the syndrome rating on
which our comparative statistical analyses
were based, it is our contention that for
lower—class persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom relief or
the patient’s capacity to resume work, while
for upper—class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as “de—
veloping insight,” or “working through one’s
problems.”
While these investigations have again
demonstrated the role of social factors in
psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly
impressed by the methodological problems of
studies across institutions. These institutions

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol

14,

Jan 1966

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TREATMENT—KAHN ET AL

were selected for their educational leader—
ship and the expectation that the recorded
variables would be clearly deﬁned. But dif—
ferences in institutional style made it difﬁ—
cult to obtain comparable data. This
experience is a cue to the problems of the
conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric
therapies. The use of discharge ratings, di—
agnostic classiﬁcations, or length of hos—
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic
evaluations or the identiﬁcation of comparable populations are subject to extensive
error unless the institutions are clearly
matched for staff attitudes and style as well
as social class patterns in patient popula—
tions. These difﬁculties also extend to the
failures of scientists to conﬁrm clinical or
laboratory observations made in other labo—
ratories, for the lack of conﬁrmation may
reflect differences in populations and psy—
chiatric criteria as much as errors in the
original hypotheses. The use of the terms
“schizophrenia” or “psychoneurosis” to explore changes in psychological and biological
features of mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative results. Even were a
valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods
to describe psychiatric populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the
hypothesis. Increased attention must be paid
to the classiﬁcation of subjects by “objective” criteria rather than our present
methods, so highly dependent on institu—
tional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist—patient
interaction.

25

Summary
Population

characteristics, deﬁned by
social class, age, education, and F score; were
related to treatment variables in three
voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment vari—
ables included type of treatment, duration
of hospitalization, diagnosis, and discharge
evaluation. Interinstitutional differences
were observed in patient social class, years
of education, and distribution of California
F scores, but not age.
The variations in treatment characteristics
among institutions were signiﬁcantly differ—
ent in the predicted direction. The institution
serving upper-class patients did have the
longest duration of stay, a higher proportion
of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and more com—
plex diagnostic schemata, a lower proportion
of patients receiving somatic forms of
therapy, and the poorest discharge ratings
among the three institutions. Similarly, the
institution serving lower-class patients did
have the shorter periods of hospitalization,
lower proportions of psychoneurotic diag—
noses, and the better discharge evaluations.
These variations in psychiatric practices
followed a pattern consistent with the social
class differences among the institutions and
are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make
comparisons of diagnoses, duration of hos—
pitalization, and treatment results between
institutions difﬁcult and tenuous, and the
need for more objective criteria for the
classiﬁcation of psychiatric populations is
emphasized.
Aided, in part, by grants MY-2092 and MY-2715, of the
National Institute of Mental Health, US Public Health
Service and the Nassau County Mental Health Board. Dr.
Max Pollack aided in gathering material for this study.

REFERENCES
Hollingshead, AB, and Redlich, F.C.: Social
C lass and Mental Illness: A Community Study, New
York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
2. Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Social
Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary
Mental Hospital, J Hillside Hosp 6:216—228, 1957.
3. Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitali—
zation, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis, Arch Gen
Psychiat 1:565—574, 1959.
1.

al: The Authoritarian
sonality, New York: Harper &amp; Brothers, 1950.
4. Adorno, T.W., et

Per—

Kahn, R.L.; Pollack, M.; and Fink, M.; Social
Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Ther—
5.

apy,

J Nerv Ment Dis

130 2187-192, 1960.

N.H., et al: Social Class, Diagnosis and
Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals, Soc
Problems 10 :191-196, 1962.
7. Pasamanick, B.; Dinitz, S.; and Lefton, M.;
Psychiatric Orientation and Its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital, Amer J
Psychiat 116:127-132, 1959.
6. Siegel,

Arch Gen Psychiat—Vol 14, Jan 1966

�26

Families of Children Wit
nia
hi
hood
SchizoPhr
Early
Sc ected Demographic Informajion
L IS HENDRICKSON LOWE, MA, INDIANAPOLIS

PREVIOUS STUDIjS regarding

the

etiological importance of l‘family background
in childhood schizophr ia have produced
Kanner4
i
ressions.
and
diverse ﬁndings
has stated that autistic hildren are usually
found to have intellige , sophisticated pareducational
attaine
high
have
who
3a
ents
level. In his populatio 10f autistic patients,
grad—
school
high
the
we
of
parents
94%
and
49%
fathers
of
while
74%
uates,
of the mothers had co 'pleted college. In
another publication,3 he ‘emarked on a low
incidence of divorce :1 ng these families.
Bender,1 on the other h d, has noted that
'ong the parents
no such trends exist
of schizophrenic childre seen at Bellevue,
"

t

"

wide variety of backgrou
It has also been rep ed that a fairly
in
is
a
s
common
to
of
ratio
boys
high
these
that
and
ion,
schizophrenic pop
children are freq ﬂy the ﬁrstborn in their
male-fe—
the
lists
nder2
sibling group.
1
in a group of 142
male ratio as
7
of
under
chil
age.
en
years
schizophrenic
autistic
27
of
ulation
with
a
Phillips,6
is
which
boys,
that
noted
were
children,
also
He
6:1.
ratio
male—female
0
early
a
autistic
of
ition
ordina
data
on
presents
children. In the general opulation, the ex—
is
44.12%.6
children
ﬁrstborn
of
rate
pected
In a group of 635 disturbed (but nonautistic) children, Phillips found that
27
the
of
while
ﬁrstborn,
76.38% were
autistic children, 81.5% were ﬁrstborn.
that
to
data
these
suggest
Phillips interprets
autistic children differ from the normal
population in matters of sexual ratio and
ordinal position as do lesser disturbed chil:1
of
the
suggestion
out
dren. He points

continuum, with more vere childhood dis—
turbances appearing cw comitantly with a
higher ratio of boys 'l girls, and with a
‘l
stborn children. It
higher proportion of
should be noted that ny data on ordinal
position can be undistood better when
viewed in conjunctio with maternal age
at the birth of the chi
these various re—
Discrepancies amo
ports of data may be due to disparities in
om which samples
patient populations
were drawn. Bender nd Kanner, however,
drew their patient ample from different
population groups ,' ith respect to socio‘anner’s probably came
economic status.
largely from peopl in higher socioeconomic
groups in a unive ity community while
Bender had a wide population to draw
from in New York ci . Since this poten—
tial error is compounc d by the relatively
low incidence of c'dhood schizophrenia
in the general

.

The p pose of the present paper is
to make .available pertinent information
collected etween 1955 and 1963 in the Chil—
dren’s S :VICC of LaRue D. Carter Me—
morial Ho' ital, Indianapolis. The data on
children is compared with that
schizophre
obtained on y-\turbed children given diag—
childhood schizophrenia.
noses other
Since LaRue
Hospital is the only
nit for disturbed
residential treatmen
youngsters in the stat of Indiana, the patient population is probably representative
of all geographic areas of the state as well
as a variety of socioeconomic backgrounds.

t

Ca

Method

Subjects.—Included in the study were the children
whose preadmission diagnosis was one of emotional
disturbance, whether or not the child was admitted
Arch Gen Psychiai—Vol 14, Jan 1966

Submitted for publication March 18, 1965.
From the Indiana University Medical Center. .
Reprint requests to 64 Mercury Ct, West Springﬁeld,
Mass 01089.

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L. I. New York, 1959— 1962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts MEntal Health Center and the C. F. Menninger Memorial
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
hand the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded,

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to payu In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birth, These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratingsa In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingso
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)c Higher F scores, i.e,, greater stereo—
typy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recovered,
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that dif—
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital, To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -‘ Hillside
Hospital, the C. F° Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Bostono These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classes°
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psycho—
analytically—oriented psychotherapy,
This study was designed to determine the population character—
istics of the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and

discharge evaluation

among

the institutions,

�..2.~

METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo—
phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
statuso The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intrathospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
sizeso
The

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or mentioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institutions, however, the many differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome,
When

1. Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult.

criteria for

differed

among

At Menninger

Hospital psychotherapy was designated as
treatment administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res~
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedo
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy

designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psycho—
therapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger HOSpital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systemso Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono

�Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of im~
provement at the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)a For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
30

institutionsw

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
1. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having mOre years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Manninger
did not graduateo
c) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per~
cent with scores of 50 or above —- the higher F scores being associated with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 300
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attain—
ment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These diff—
erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables
2.

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

a) Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received

somatic therapy than at Hillside

(64%)

or

MMHC

Hospitalization:

(68%)

(Table IV),

three insti~
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)9
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per-cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of
hospitalization°
b) Duration of

The

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"e The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centerm

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diag—
disorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diag—
nostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one—quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per-cent of the
population°

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsidec Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periods“
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a yeare
The

Table

—-—\

V

�-7DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var—
iables
duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7),
The

——

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmed, The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psy—
chiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data, While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, gig}, where objective criteria de—
fining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorderso Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his per—
ceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the
examiners,

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one institution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment resultso
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutions°
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background, It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria employedo This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems.”
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been great—
ly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across in—
stitutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hos~
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populations.
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis'l to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective'' criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in—
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluationw Inter—institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted direction. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionsc
\Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the institutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
These

differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric populations is emphasizedo
Such

�REFERENCES

l.

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

Sanford,

Brothers,

R. N. The
New

Authoritarian Personality°

York, 1950, 990 pp.

J.

and
Harper and

2. Hollingshead, A. B. and Redlich, F. C. Social Class and
Mental Illness: A Community Study. John Wiley and Sons,
Inc., New York, 1958, 442 pp.
.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216—228.

Kahn, R.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization,
G
Ps h'
Diagnosis.
1959,
.,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

Sociopsychologic
Voluntary Mental
Discharge Ratings and

is 565-574.

Fink, M. Social Attitude (Cal—
Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. .leﬁﬂah_lkﬂﬂﬁ_Dlﬁ,,
M. and

1960, lﬁﬂ: 187-192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Ameri_la_£sxchiat., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete_Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comgarisons for Sociogsxchological Variables
MEnninger

Hospital
N

I

Social

Class

III

Hillside

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IIIIIKEEIIIIIIHIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHEIIIIIIII
31%

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34
.

.

IV

1

34

V

O

5

X

2

=

121.5; df=8: p&lt;.OOl

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHNIEIIIIIIIIIIIHHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJBHIIIIIIII
19/
Ag e

20- 39

IIIINIIIIIlllllﬂﬂddﬂllllIIIIIIIHHEIIIIIIIIIIIEHIIIIIIIII
Years of

Educatio

&lt; 12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
jMenninger
N

Treatment

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

.m-m-mHospital

Type of

Hillside

Psychotherapy

Hospital

Somatic

Other

=82 8
Duration
of
,

Hospitallzatlon

7

df= 4

.

.001

months

7-11 months
~11 months

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

29.3' df=4' .&lt;.001

'

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

23.8' df=4' -&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Ass

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30—39

61

30

40-49

30

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization

By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Agg

Below 20

Hillside

81

20-29

73

30-39

61

30

ho-h9

30

20

50

+

MMHg

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Menninger Hillside Massachusetts

.m---Hospital

N

Psychotherapy
Somatic

of
Treatment

Type

WW

Other

l

Duration of

Hospitalization

Hospital Mental Health
Center

9

21%

36%

2b%

h3

6h

68

36

--

8

»

.

_

.

_..W.xi:82-8:.§_£:-hz P&lt;-001
mud-Mm...“ w...»

W
7-11 months

x2=90.6; df=h; p&lt;.OOl

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

f

‘&gt;

.

M=H

Discharge
Diagnosis

.

.. .

A

_

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

10

,WWWWWr

.

x3=29.3; df=L-

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

&lt;.OOl

~~_”__M

17

26

29

WmamWNW-w‘mm
mmﬂmw

—-_.——_...__.... . ~...

�Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

i

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health

Years of
Education

'

F

Score

lBO-h9
‘

1

b1

l

50

i

38

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved

Sindrome
Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�1.

W
um.
mam.
W.
W
W
9.11.,

“at“.
.
1959.
I
law
“mu-m. 4...:
1.1.:

a.
3.

I.
5.

1.

Mun.

am.

m

W
W
man at mu:

tutu“.

mama-u.
tum-«Ina. 5.]. an nun». no.
M rm. m- we

Wm:
‘ M. In... ‘”.o
m.

3.1...

rum.

I. m m. 1.: mu:

mm

1::

I“ Maintains.
m.
Mm“ Ct WWW hail-“u “ I 7.1““ In“!
lupin): PM“... u wanna“... hum um
and Emu,
A!
195’:
“’05“;
u
Km. mt... nxm. I. «a an. 1.: um: “um.
(ﬁnal-m 3 m1.) and mum W,
1,60.
“I'd”.
m:
and
8.
I...
mm...
I...
mm.
PM».
thuﬂ'tt
Mutant. m 1“ “um n W” m mun.
1-

an.

11.1...

ram.

I.

and

H

6.

I...

m"

. mm: mm».

1959.

-..1L,.}x.;....h..

W

W

.132-

m-m.

�I. I. ‘M

mm

mmto

may. Wan-I ml "um
Mahal‘ mm. mum at. W if ”all
nun. m. mama-aim, rump-um“
at
in. “but. man a noun-mun. mu
nd unit"- «than.
h lama-um magnum“: Wm“ an
a:
:new mu m. "an
mm
smut“a: man all dun-mun a! mum ! ”an. m.
lupin!”

at «I.

mmmuwmmumm
manua- m I“
“Wham “threat
ti. New mutt-I.
no” mm a urn-mm. ”an... “no:
mm on” «mm m
”non mm
manual-n all an at
n has; manna-nu.
3.

to In

1:

b.

with

a

an

S.

«no mo mt»
“nun, a minus-nun. nu ma.»
Amman man“ um “mm. at m

Wu,

m
I» m
of

mu!“
and

no

W
“ﬁlm a mum:
abs-nun «ital-u 0:

In“... I: ”huts“.

«may.

at

m‘

�’1‘!-

banana“... a «awn :- WWI «mum

mu
“mu m

a-

«was
m
may»
to
“I.“ it. mutton at. «m1:
n:mm
mm
a ”no“ mung.
mm
mm
«I :0:- na“ uum am an» M0 mm»... a»
.1
to
atomlulu-I
m
u
an
mm
”WI.
of
Human".
a.

m
“mama.“ mun... tummuww
mwuumarmuuuwmum»
“on
mun-tn. «was. u u m u a. mm:
MﬂWM-ulﬂmmu'MW
W.
mm' “Wan” mu“ a. W h
tun-u
(ukunow“:
uﬁ
m1
Won
and

at

«a

at

mun-wwwuﬁuﬂmn.
In
runs-w
and
Ina-um.
m
an
mm“;m
m

to

n

to
I».
n u m mm mun mm». min“..Mutant: h an“. a uni mum. Mun“
u’
b.
an“
«mum
u“ u m Wins“: ”on”
than
w
'nunun'
uxwu
«Mun
nun
Mama;

“mung-M autumn»...th
and

.- taut-um}. «I aim «um

WW

o!

my

manual.-

m ﬁwﬂi-nttut 13mm.

�man-mum.» man

:mmw What

in than

m um mm.
a“
1..

was, "um". nu

It: rm.

m
W!»
M‘mp an “Oil.
“a

or

of

"tum mum

um.
mm.

um.

am.

Wam;

'0’.

in!"
0:
I24”!
an»
a: Inga!“ 1.3..“an. mu
«any man mu

mum. Wu

mus-m
a. “and.
an in him

m
mmmumomnummmmuum

wwumuu

mamwmmea.
mm: MM“.
01
um»:
Imam.
'0:th
um
Wt
‘7;
'0’.
'0'.
mm.
1/0""

��unmumm.
mmrm
nit-a ma
lunar I m. in!" «an!»
ma
nth,
:- ”unto annual Wthan: ”man“ an m
(1.6}.

no

Mm“ m mun thorn”. “mulls“ In! a 0mm

pm.mmnmmmummndumn
and.

mm

that
at
tun
not!”
«an»
an
“h
mm“
cam 1a mam «rant: n! ”’0th tan-taut nanny

hmwammmmumuummm
in arm unu- uu-u. mum...
ma um nun-um
to

~mum«cumin-nuns».non-mm“amounting“.
9.!
the
“Ian
ca.
”and...
9.10.:th
..
ma
mm

mummmwmmuommmn
loam Nth an“! mm. Mn “tutu“!!!

M
«ant an“:
with

mof

01'

tin

mutton that that «no! ”that.

nuns“. It In

“than“

tint

1-

than

in
in
n
«mum-u:
an“
“that. W!
mum
tunianat a“ much In!) 1. a man mam. nth a

than

W
WWW-what“
mammmuMum-Wmuan
nu tun
«pin-ha
M

W

“at: and not!»

rm:

«Input-natahat
nay-haw

mm

mm Wit "It“ “roam
”In“!
a: voluntary nun-tn m «an ant ”and. «than: «an.
‘1’

mom-anarmauu-mmumm

�as-

mum mm»... «I m manual: I!“
in
and
I
mm
m
mo“
In.
was
mm
m.
to it. “but man»
a ”I.“ in:
of
o:
mo
a
What. mm mama“. W:
um may” ”all.“ can a. “guano”.
or

man

�.5...

l my 0! .11 ”mm. “‘1‘ ”mu 1. mm
115!1.
than
a
mnum In
m.
3m.
and
ad
mun! mm man. «law “no“. only.
mommwu mm In!“
cum (age) can mwm by m
In 3mm.
at 1 was. «MW “a“
walnut: n m
hand. an, wan-tutu ta- 3 most“
want.
it.» ”in“: an mam In: th It“: Mann 0: am
I
“minim “aka. I.» mum m an: a»

mm

.wmumn
m.

m

m
W
“Gamma-m. mhsmmmummmu

«M'nm-mumuwmmmm
at
at
as
max
in
aw.
mum. mm

m
m Inn-am
1m «mm
man I“ mun m W a. ““7
“I. mm“:
u m.
W
m ”WM“ In“!
mm.
m
m
u

tutu“!

cu...

-

or 173

Old ’5

at

tau-«u

«r

a

(U).

“a!“

no at

«on It
pm!»

"hum
man
rum to a. mum: mm“ can. out sauna”
I. all u Wm uuuuuna. than
an
o:
”mu
«am
mm
mm.
In.“ «sauna ban. no” mum-3m. an no» In“:

a

and: “an“

m,

ﬂu

“WM W».

or the

W
mm

a“ when.

1.-

of

m

«mnupwummwcwnma
it. mm m autum- vﬂi nun- a: kins»
«mm m.

�matmartin am

m

I'm a:
gunman.
«to: he gram at out”

tn "mm m man! u
in “am“ a ”nu.
“and a mum! mm.
Mutation m “MI-pun M um auroral. «a m a

m.

imam
«nu-um
m «mum.
am
an
on
than
in
manual»
it “uh-mu “mm
and
m; mm ”aunt ”mm. a sum “it my
1|
cum-mu:
um um Manual “0 his
an an"
.8 an

and.

awn

«mom. Wan-numoumumm”
or
an
dug-nut
«an.
I“
In.
train“,
a
m
cm
“an a hat-o»
a)

m.

74.4-.2,‘

;

4%.:

s

n. ham.

:0:-

muuuu
”am my!“ 'MQMMW“ mam.
in» muu‘m. has... many a amnmauu

m
caucus.

that a

W
”M
WWWWnammuwnnw
magma m» ”as” m .mm
loan“!

A.

m “in.“ u

in.
tout-u a» m pmmwu mu.” m manna M
of "him :mamun an.» an.
n lama mun:
m 4mm a
Who“ was“ um: in
taunt. In“
n:-

an

mm
mm.

a

�ol-

M!
mm.”
mum
«nuts... .0 moi-mm il- muuu pmmm. I. m«an m m “a“.
u no human“: mm in!“
W‘ mm.

at: not

but

m
Wm
manna»
mau..
m

on
n
o:
mitt-u
«01mm
m
Mo ration“. mmxuuu. ”cal mm... an" m
m1“: sad-nu. m1 m6. at not Ion-tau an at

mm a “I

nun m Wu“
um num "mm 3»me n m mm for
annual:

mumt’a

1..

mamummuumumruum.um
at out: out.

Wc
a“ mum

W103

W“.
Inuit-(u lupin}.

Imam). manna-1

I»)

Wu

rm
m

upland

m

“(ﬂu-1‘3. M.
”1:131. minus"

«a nun

mun

Ir an “aim Moll-m.
mu
nut-m «a me 2.11“ mm mm. toms;
at
0» mm a mm I.
m1” tun-u. tuto
an a» stunt“ mural-um 1m umu01’
um the
m savanna... hm unman- pn-

nu n

m
am.

"mat u

e!

tho

m.

man

mm.

mm
In». I

that man-u

wt“

in

no.“ and «mu.

�I'.

W«an. Wow“).

an anti". nuns at
with, a monk manua- In

”Inn! as am“

W.
WI”.
W
mxmummmnmmuumu
hmmmmhmuaamtumdmm
m

unnu- Iuﬂial «4

mm
"In: In

(mm 11).

mm.

W

m.

m an CW a. luau-an
k m .10“). um: at tho um 1”“..-

a. “swung at w- mmlu “ mu! gun.

than“: «a «mum I Bah can nun the “no
“inﬂuen- u "an“ 1. mu :11.

:30.

mm
”It In

Mmlwuﬂmcum
|)WI
mu: .m- nun-tun a: Nu
mun-um.
n
m
Ian-nut m papa-«u m pun-nutty mar

W
Ila" ”In“.
at

lupin}, ”“1. cm"

”mm m
“am

In!“ cow,
t) m: M. an I.
h m manna-1 mutant».

losl'ill

«A at

Wt-

nun.
an m «unsung-

�olol.nntanun1
In
par-lasaaui
attrirll
it.
a‘ﬁatulani. Itiﬁ»ytﬁlliﬁﬂ hivtI¢:I000.ruurI It oiuanﬁton at

I)

luggaggggp

Gum.
In!»
mm
W...“
mac n m «at at m with.“ u m m at “Input“
an
5113!“:
a:
)3
«at
put
0‘1:
M
hut am.
n
wm
m In mu.

lupin:
an
n
Mm

W

6) Iggggggp

Iaullrtlaut astrlrunuun

an an. diatribmtion

«twuthIMhmmm.
It'll-lanaur
It
it!
rmmmmmuammaum.
ﬂu
“in“.
”an“
m
MM
mi,

you

an.‘

only night

in
in!

MW
an!

patﬁuutu but 1 ashram 8.1.! 30.
‘hn hints!
«out with IOIIOO at so
ii-vu

I count: bdlcﬂ 30
but!“ 30.

of

w:-

no.

that. u‘plﬂlo an},

m. m madam

m

at Qt! pcyulaﬂiunn ant. abuarvua.

twang, per «03$ ulna

n “a mu: cm:

an ”an: an

Italttluaui

31:!Ivuncou is oduatﬁiaaux u‘ﬁailncat «at pivﬂhuumnn¢ on thI 3.310. than. Qitrbvunnon puMIxt tuiﬁtua tbs hrvoﬁhtoiu
cunnnrltuu tun rnlaﬁSUI a: Quatapquhalcciaul ttutnrn ‘0 ch.
my

mm mm m mum“.

ussnltzounttr tuna! antiantl at ﬂhlllltlr Insulin: (hJi) ran
outwit nuuntlu Chutupy ﬁnal at 8:11:11; (6&amp;5) at aunt (683)
Q: etc"! in lbhlc It.

�..

m
to
rm. ”an":

«tum mun

W

usu-

(m1. 1?).
loans. at“ ‘5‘

III

manual:

m
”an“ m. minus-d

,,

.,

-,

a my

loath).
a! ”that! Stand.“ for “it" an“. It
to 31 9.: mt at the must“ manta n4

m. mod
Wiwmwmummmuuxmtmza
Guam. mmxuwctuuuxnxummm

mummmnmwaumwum
at
In
Myst-awn“;
mm
am:
«maul
m

mm

out baptist. an
(mu
mm.“ In a. “no at dun-W a
1"). M
a mm
ﬂuvial.
(:9!) d ”that: um and in “WW“ «I! only i
«11.06
pus-at
at “m Wand".
m
“an
It. “about moat-co I!
I! ”am mm”
um... (:65) an a. mu‘
a:
(m)
with! lat“ mm.
M. to“ at w:
.,

m

W

a)

‘

.,

In

_.

W,

“W"
mm.

”W“
"W“

mac. ”W“
In 11qu W3. mu W“:

W“
W:

“may nu “is: “human. “taut. mu”,

m min-mun m pmmuw mam (an. 1').
m “mu: grower-“u: it ”an" am. a».
um “all.” for 8111:!“ mm ms in m: Elm“; m but

W

mm“!
amt“:
«um
a .mmmu u “that" mums.

in" dunno! an

um

We,
haunt: haunt ”samurai: n‘ mutant?
2::

.1:

may:

�«to.
naiuunaal

(it any. than titur par oaa‘ at in. population.
Stilt I?

“m.W
I!» intrtnhocyttil otQinttual Qau’arincul wart
Ianatod'by a itrtaiv it uaﬁhnn¢a¢¢i¢01 grdblaun. lint uran-

an§~oat
c.¢ﬁmlttp:1
urttnriu
It:
lbw it. lubd1v1::aa of ﬁlpﬂll‘l‘ll; in pav‘ It. in tho hulacnno~
1‘7 of 5h. puyuiatznn viihin aleh.1alttia§lon and to It. nuan
pl. tins. x. ‘33 ntntiutical aanlynau watts; I ain't. sultan
tn‘ita auv¢ru1 0411: VI?! dhiuintn ﬂittt had uaﬁlnr you. at
thin: than :17; cut... that an&amp; yovnlttaug a catsnsuoinnr

iaost

030 tank

tltrltnnpttal
I.

tan%

It nailing!!!

.3 tin iyrvtIOita.

with that nuthnailautaal ltnstuitou nan. trundItntlur ﬁn thni than! in it: IDVIIUI tinny III. Iluurvui. Il‘hanch in! auto ot’ntitaatlcal signittauaan. 81th raunrl so
loluc‘aun at tvnainnnt. sq: umwnpln, in. an: 1 near. uurc
(bald rel-todlb Xinntnair 33:919.! (axdqr 3" light! 3 salt.

puttunts nova trigulutlr'ruoaﬁvlns Ollﬁ.&amp;ﬂ thartlr). Out I
score Ilia. at nxxxuaac.
hcucth at hooy1¢n11anaon nil oircnclacaaal can I!!!
rtlnﬁcﬁ It tutu chm Quanta!!! can Illlnlln InlpIQ|1n - tit

�W

ﬁttl

m
mm
1m.»
a.
mm.
mm
«a nuts-Inn" m nW£ in an. m lupin}...
mum“

can!“ Mismatmm (Mb 1) Mn»

tau-nu
ruched

m

Ito,

1m

5“ 15! 9‘ ”Man

m
W

than a

m.

mu t

m

the

m

or so

�.12»
aggﬁuaaggg

an man

In
Inn-yuan In

or

Watt-to
alum
m

in. mm «um-mt Manama-u:
6311mm 0: gaunt. u m min. an»)... 3: run
and
nanna‘aan
$001.1 Ullﬂl, iii It. can: in tilirtbu‘inu
it
or alum-u: r lulu can” and in ml: or m “in.“
virlnblou .. Iﬁrn‘lnl of hnI’tIIISuD‘AOI, unlocttul ﬁt
and
was.» inviting“ 0: «mu m tum".

it. qnpto$ctlau ﬁltﬁ tit tliﬁtllttOI alvvtlt
01m ”tuna mu in. th- an”! «man at am.
a mau- pm“... a!
and
tum-u an m:yln
«but... in» pm.- at ”an“ mu»
«a: pm!» Mum“ "um
in arm (an qt
«I. out min-d. Inﬂow. m mus-um amt-u
Ovulunitill.

w
mu.

W“.

W.

lint! 01.3! yatlsﬁli ovtatii Ihutﬁan parluiu at halptﬁultaliacl,
1n
3: paw-mu mm”, and mm m.

pm
cm” mmnm.

umum
M
mun
at. Will-M m mum in
It :- «r

m

mm

«Ilium

«um m t. «(tum mutt»
1n

in

min-

um:
an
win.
1.:

must“ to”... muuum 1: «am at human»
um aunt. u at. tho min“: of magma: rmuum,
mmu Quinn-u. «Imam or punt-than”. m m

«an.

and

Mt

a:

m“

«a. M. “van“.

�~13-

nkumMm'mlrrmo-um «mutumu
a» man.

mawdmmtmme-v«qu
up“ a mu cum "mun
«nun»
Mn

a-

unummmmuummuumnm.
«umummvmmtummm”mumsthe
M
nut Many
m
W1. mu. Mm mu:
m
”an“
pm!
mm,
mun
M
W

tummﬁmmmtmﬁmuauwu
than
m

“law.

in. «mu
mmm rum»
M
m pom» What man. u m,
mm.
x...
3..
in
u
mi;
who“.
ma
Mun-t.
mm»
mm
ﬁlo
which
“I!
ma It”. ”um“
IWQ mm. m
in

m

and

ummummuuuumuunmm.
ill mm mm» mu“. m m it".

usumumsuucwmmmtm
It
on
nun»
”tram «ﬂow 9. manna.

«a

MI»
III
u
“out.“ mm mm. mu
mm
pm:
a. ham m: m m «scum m We
Oh.
at
a!
u»
may
u
“an
um.
man
a.
m mu I. is. mumn'l m "um,
I. um an m Mm Mat mutton :- tho

W

W

m

�«15.

W
W
«Mm-Quantum. nmmmmm
x. my mum. mxnm'
at
Mal-at

mm

vacuum
u
m
a»
an
«sum
at
m
(5)

hwmm'tWMWMWu-num
«that ”I". Ml In has nun-m mm a a.
mum cw. rub WW «m t mm“ mm
mumcmxnmummmmumm.
MMMummnuuuMu-rmun
nun-nu: mu m mu, It to II! mun“.- an

mmomomumu$hmmwu
”but: u m "not a: m mum's my a m
mn.mummammmmmwumm
unqu- muo- u 'mm mt“. n ‘mm
at" wanna".

w
mu
“mun“ In“ «mu-m
«nu-comm.» “Mina mm.
“MI: W
WI.
manual.
«1m
M
m
m mthat“). m
“no

haw

by

m

the

win-hm

not}... at

mumm-

W:
mwmmmuunmumm. mm

for tho”

‘8.

maﬁa“

that

to
Mﬂm‘t
it
a
aw
“not” ”ﬂaw “in.
Muwuum‘wmumnama
a: mum). In a mu" than“... may
nomad“.
tummuuucmmmm.
Mu Hum, am“. nm-mum a mu at
‘

�WW
m
We W

Aspects of

in

mom

L. Kuhn.

Biol)...

Mn:

Volmmy Hospitals

Pollack, Ph.D.

Nlﬂ'micl 81.301, Bub.“

ski
Max

Fink, 11.13.”.

�WMmdanwlmth-mﬂmsmumtudat
th- Dcpu'tnnt of
Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

61m Oaks,

L.I.,

Wm

N.Y., 1959-82.

MWofﬁuauffsofﬁummmm
thathOuTtwmmc.F.MminwaHo-pimismtem1y

mm.

Aidld, in part, by grant: Hit-2092 md bit-2715, of the Nttimal
Institute cf Hontal Hulth, v.3. Mlle Health Sonics; and the
Nassau Oumty Minn]. Halt!) Bond.
*
**

m

*ﬂ

HIP

-

12/15/81!

Adm”:
:

:

mamm, Winn Hospital

chmnw,
Division of

National Institute of

Wadi,

Md.

NELLY.

Natal Halth,

of Fwd-Aim at the mam
Institute of Paydxiatry of the School cf
Unimity of Nissan-1, mo
Main,
Amend Strut, St. Louis 39, Ho.
Department

�Inthirsmdiosofﬁuwﬁmmtﬂcpatimtpopuhﬁm.

Wmmmmmmadmiﬂmtmmbumuxm

maw'smummmmmmmmmmosmam

unamtypucfdimoddbmwmmmofpoydduuic
ﬁninﬂmdﬂ'nmicatmofﬂn
mimtmﬂnnvdlabmtyofmwdngml,m,mmtmd.

WWQ).

mummhotmutmmmmrormiunm

Mind-Wefpaﬁmt'sﬂnmcesmdthcmihbﬂityofmmu

mama
WW.1m1udim MdMIpaydmmy,Wﬂm~apymomwldw
Hillsidn I-Ioapitalinlgm.

Inﬂaiahospital,avu~htyof

Minmmﬂabhtompatimtanmmsofﬂnirabmwmm.

Inﬁmeamys(¥,5)mobmdﬁutpaﬂmhmpitniudfmﬂuumt

mmmom,mmmimmmmoﬂmoffmimmm.
Mam.mmdmnmmmmlymamdbymﬂdw
Wadmimdmfavmhcmﬁmﬁsmm. mm,

m,miwmmmmmmmmitmmdfwlm

m.mm1ywpymmmmmwmm.
Mammalfwmmmommodmamofmmtypy.“

W
W,
famdinpudmﬁdagmudasinwlutimﬂwyahmia,wlmmmfmfw
California

I"

Beale

(1,8).

WPW.

1.3.,

wen often

Wiwmmy.hoap1miudfwmmm.mdmmmm
Wummmdormmmd.

Inthinmy,itwmamutadﬂntd1ffmsinpoydmmamat‘

WmmpiWMduﬂmtminfhmofmlfwmunm
fwﬂnpuﬁmtswitmnmmmothapim. Tomtmhsugguﬁmitm

�qummpmmmmmsvmmmmmummm
35.118160

tbspim,mc.P.WW1IbapitalinTcpoknmdﬁn

Wmmnwmmminamm.

mmmmumd

ﬂmﬁnmumMﬁWWpatimofdiffmtmnmmd

mamawrmdmdbitammwmmmmmmim.

Mwamm-mmdwlmmmdm,mddom

W

Whamwmmmwithafullﬁm
staff and native mm units. may miss

midnmtodhlm.

”Wr-

mmimtimﬁmwiﬂtmpmtomlclus,ago,emdmmdang

anmmcmmsﬂammmtmmofwofmt,
Wofmiunntim,dimismddismmmmmgminstimtims.

'

�WI)
Ammofmwlmwy,adultpatiminmidaminthoimtimHospitals
timmmdertdminJm,1959. WMwdeimido

hadmlmmmimmly,amnnmofmnmmmmmm
mammtm)mmimdwmmmmimicmlmﬁmor
mmmofamemzoﬁmicsmhmpimmmfaxmrwa

mmmmmtmmmm

moiﬂememmjwt.
ofﬂnirmvulmtmnm. mealifminl’amlemoomedfwam

patimtmﬂuwmday.

WmmhmﬁnMddi-WMMW

mamﬁusminlmdpsydﬂnudcfwmdﬂnm.

Forum

amma,mmW2~£WW-ammofmm
mW~mW(2;8).mmmhdmmimdof173Mmm

www.menmmrmdasnmmmmmmmomm.

WWW
mmummummmmmmuuummm.
ofﬁnmhﬁamofﬂumhlmm

m
diffmsdismmdbelw.
madam m

diffiwlt

My.

These

became of

Mass musical

difﬂmltleswmmtmdinmim~

Inspimmmm,mdmowdingly,inmm1yauofmkmovumbm

mm

diffmnm batman institution with citation of
M. diffimdtiualsoladmmiuinginfmtim

ambush will be placed on the

mm.

fermdcta,whiehismmmedinﬁnmingpopuatimmlesm1nﬁu
tables.

�1.

mmmm
Hmmpwtingmfmmimtituﬂm,ﬂnsmwtmofﬂn

mapitalwhowmfwgrmudmdthwimmdormﬁmdbﬁeny.

The

mammmﬁhmmmmmmmmn
Whileﬂmeinstitutimswmummas
mmmuplemum.

Whintawhing,mmdnmdmmpmm,ﬂmmhmﬁmuny
mmainwmmddainﬂmoedﬁndntaofmnudy. Spocificpmblm

mpmnhmtinﬁnduiyuﬁmoftypeofmm,dmticcludfmﬂaw,mmm1mt1mo£mmtmrtm.

of” “W:
mm
apnﬁmtmivad”poy&amp;wﬂumy"diffmdmgtmmmm,mkingm
mowimdafcrduigutingthxt

0.)

punbilitydiffimlt.

Atmprwmmmmdumum

Wmapmmmmnbyamffmhmfmmm

patlmtwmdmmdafu. Sesamwiﬁlﬁnpoyddxmamimtmom~

dmmdmmmismdmpatimtm.

Wt
suffpaymiattimdidmtmtptﬂm,but

At 111mm. Hoapitnl

psyduﬁmupy was Mimd as

apaydﬂatricmim.
madam: ﬂair activities to swish; midst“: physicians.

WWW.
the
At

sessions with
Ho

additimal

WWW: Natal than}! center W133; was animated

uﬂnhmtimofmydiaciplkns~psydﬁaﬂicmsidmts,poydmlogim,

mm.nmesmdmdionlatm. Pmlmmofswhmsm

�WW=

Rndmofimmtatm
mmﬁulsvuiodinfm’cmddotaﬂ. nudismmingatmmm
«valuation
for
social,
with
a
Wmlogial
bipartite
lupin]. m
"pm.
'31

W.
8!!th
W
hndglobalntilm-ddngitdiffiwlttoumsﬁuem‘udbuﬁmofeach
factorofﬁul‘hminscrsyamﬂablcn). rammmmhmm
111118163

83d

Mental Health Center

Hospital

mmmwmmgmmormmmumm.
Table

LEW
The

II

distribution of the variables of social class, ago, education

�mdcmmmhFSodesma-mgﬁnthmeimtimtimsinmmd

in'rathII.

TABIEIII

a)

menu:

hmticipawdiffminsomlclus

miﬁmofﬁuﬂmimﬁmtimmobm.

Athmingorﬂoopital

ﬁnpopulaﬂmmmﬂywrohu;atiﬂnsmghpim,middle

Maguﬂatmﬁmmmulmm 0mm,pmdominmtlylanr
class.

b)”; Mmmdiffmsinagedistrimiminﬁn

MWWW.
'm-popuhtiaualmdiffusdinadtmtmlattaim

mm:
munithpatimtshnvingmmofmtimatmhwmspim
mummmmummmm.

Whilehlpcramtofm

Mubatmwmtmhmwmol,mly32permtat
Hillsidsmdzspermtatmmdidmtmm.

mm:
CalifomiaFSulammoobsmod.

Wiminﬂndistrimﬂmofmmm
Fifty-unwantofl‘hminm

patimhndrsmbolwaa,mdmlyuia1tpcrmntwithmof
SOwabM«ﬂnh1§nvPsmboinguWwaiﬂxhigmdcm

013W.
”WMPWWMMummlymmmtm-e
Incontmt,atﬂillsiduﬂﬂrty~mpormtofﬁn

1301:1330.

���WW

ambit“

paint:
of
variablu
ﬂat
nodal
in
durum:
Win-m: 1111:.me
yomofdmtimmdaoahlclus,hutmtm;indhtrlhrﬂmot
ot than wlmmy

The

hospitals

CaliforniaFSedasmgmminMofﬂquhsw
osmium of hospitalizatim, «mm of Wits and 613W
ameddiMavaluatimsc?)mmﬁmthatﬁumsﬂtutimsmﬂzgwclaaspatientsmuldmmlmgmdtmim

«We

diagrmcs mdmemplex
of stay, ahignrpmwrtim
forms
somatic
of
waiving
patimts
schemata,
pmportim
War
diagnostic
each omfirmd. Similarly,
and pmst die-m ratings
of
the institutim serving lwer class patients wimed shame» perm of

W,

m

hospitalization,
Wartime
evaluatims.
low

diam

of

W,
We

and

better

Itiamimpmanimthattﬁusediffmsinpsydﬁmmt-

mt an

related to differences in staff attitudes than to
in populations. mu contrasts batman institutions in

more

611’st

Workmapitannﬂmmmt,mmmmludtyofdhgmﬁc

(Ii-m
mamuIdmtofnmd-dm. mmmticdiffm
WMWumlyidWmﬂosMﬁuyfonwapattm
Minions.

evaluation, daﬂnitimc of psyemthumw,

antosanialdﬂfmnm mhmwiﬁam‘vmfhdim.

and

�inﬁmcpsymiaudamitmmdmﬁawituhmm
specific, 1.0., when objoctiw

mm

defining

W

of Imam

,psydxmemismdpuvamnty

dmdmlmbmtyﬂum's
the M18

attitudesmdupectatiombm

This
classificatim.
md
pumpkin:
form:

321qu

wwmmbymmdc,mnitzmdkfm(7)inmnudy

«mmwmmammumm. MW

mmmhassigmdtodiﬂmmdidmtdﬁfwinw
Simiﬂamt
m.odmudm.agcormisdmcm
ofmum,mita1

diffmmdidm,mm,inﬂuimimofmdimu

m1..bhm1ngnrﬂoopitalmmmsthighlytmimdpmmlom-

WW,Witspntimtafwmlmgutdmwhufmt
mﬁmtndimoudauclﬁmmia.

Myanitmpormmw

�Wt
mamm,mmpsmmtwmmm,
malts.

Mm,inm,

uhieh

ismtimlusivcin

“MGQMCWWMW‘WWMMOGWW,
minim Wutic efficacy
ofﬂnimtitutims. Wedonothamindepmdmtcrimiaform
Thu” findings do not mﬂnct

than

quﬂityofam,mﬂummto£mpmb111tyofpopulatimam

motinmamﬂnimﬂmim.

Simeﬁnavaluatimm

Wmﬂninﬂitutim'smminga,mboummmdiffemm

mﬂaethﬂaﬁmmﬁmmmmwfwcmmofimmt
mm

than my intrinsic maxim-10

In our

initial

mm.
it

3111316: study (5)

was

postulated that

diffmt

«mm
mm 1W1: m
Itmmsmmtﬁnhimmmm'ssocial
utilized for poms of

of

W.
WWmmhxmwimwlmd.

social

Thishashm

nun-llyomﬁmdinmmmtamdy,withm'am1ma

'Wmummdmmngﬁngotmmmmw
tints. Mmidcmmoymmﬁngmmdxmmdw
“WWW“,itiswmtmdonﬂutfwlm
Mmmmapttommwmmhﬁmtom
unofwﬁupaﬂmt'smpmitytommm,whihfmwm
palms 6!. criteria
mama-'3 or

Wis.

mm mm

such

ain't

will): intmgiblos

mm."

as "developing

�mummmdmmmmmmmdmemuo:

Wifwmmpaymmicw,mmhmmﬂyw

bymmﬁmdologimlpmblmofatwiumsimtimﬁms.

Thane

imﬁtndmmumfwﬁnbcmﬁamlumpmdﬂn

Wmmmdmbmmdmmmwmd.
obtain

mm
Mammuammﬁnpmblmofﬂumdaulm

65.1ch

data.

But

in

style

made

it difficult to

mmblc

ofmantiwstaﬁatim,apocidlyinﬁuommimofmmimie

Mics. Mmofdismmﬁm,dimﬁcﬂudﬂaﬁmsor

Mdmitmuﬁmumminmmmwﬁu
to extensive
of

warm
imtitutims
mien

countable popuhﬂms

the

m

clan-1y

m swim

mm

m

for staff attitudn cad

styhumllusocialclasspaminpatimtpomlaﬁom. cholicve

mmfmmmommﬁufaﬂmofmimﬁsummﬂm

mbmmrmdmmimmmmmmmw

sdmbmduudbymmiwmulu. Manudobmatimtobo
Whamlnbomtmy,ttnmﬁmdsmmtavaﬂablctodaym

mmmmmmmmrwmmmm.

�-13-

Inam‘asod

attunticn must ho paid to tho althodblogiaal prcblumn of

classifying

mjom

mlthads, so highly dnpgndant an

m

criteria
institutional

by ”objcativa"

than the present

and obonrvur

attitudul

mmmmmmmammm-pmmm.

�Wmmnsxm
1.

Inﬁmowydmmic-mmmmgmﬁtnn,

WWmmammmmmtm-hbm.

Populatimsmdcﬂmdbyaomlelus,m,adumtimmfsm.

mmmhmmtypoofumt,dmﬁmofhmpitmadm.

Wwﬂmmmﬂm.
2.
3191131121“:

inurhwﬁtutianl

diffm m

obscured in

Wﬂmofpatimtsoahlelus,ymofodmutimm

diuudbuﬁmofcuifwml‘m,butmtago.

mmmmmwummmum
timmfmmbouigﬂﬁmﬂydiﬁmtinmpmdicmd
3.

dim.
It.

mmmmymammmnmnm

mumtwithmmclusdﬂfmwmgimﬂmdmsmdm

thuidiosynmtie.
5.

matrmmmmmmummmof

W,mumof)mpimnmim,mdmammultnbam

mmwﬁmdtmmm,mmmdfmmobjwdw
«imamimdmofmmﬁmsismim.

�REFERENCES

1.

Adorno, T.w., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,
&amp;
New
Brothers
York, Harper
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,

1950.

Two-Factor Index of Social Position,

Hollingshead, A.B.:

mimeo—

graphed publication.
Mental
and
Class
Social
F.C.:
Redlich,
&amp;
New
John
Sons, Inc.,
Wiley
York,
Community Study,

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

1958.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

1957.
216-228,
g:
§g_p.,
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,

l:

565—57h, 1959-

(CaliM.
M.:
Attitude
Social
and
Fink,
Pollack,
R.L.,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
Dis.,
J.
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
fornia Scale)

Kahn,

122: 187-192, 1960.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,

Psychiatric OrientaTreatment in a Mental

S. and Lefton, M.:

tion and Its Relation to Diagnosis and
1959.
127-132,
Amer.
J. Psychiat., llé:
Hospital,
Siegel, N.H., Kahn, R.L., Pollack,
and Treatment in Three

M.

and Pink, M.:

Social Class, Diagnosis

Psychiatric Hospitals, Social Problems, 10:

191—196, 1982.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

~W‘_

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Improved

Unimproved

Unimproved
Syndrome
.._.W

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Markedly Improved

W-

�III

TABLE

InterhosEital

Comparisons for SocioEsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

;

Hospital

Hospital

Education

17

’

(92)

N

3

Score

1

i

’

F

Massachusetts
Mental Health

;

10-29

1

3o-h9

W7

51%

i

’41

g

(163)
33%

50

10

g

i

76
20%

1

'1

38

}

50-70

8
1

i

17

g

M

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Massachusetts
lHillside
iMenninger
Mental

Health
Center

IHospital ‘Hospital

‘Psychotherapy

of
Treatment

Type

Somatic

h3

Other

Duration of

Hospitalization

36

’

7-11 months
1

months

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

Improved

61

’
.

'Unimproved

10

%

I

9

.

-

_

mw.,,__,‘&lt;2=29-3s df=1v

ﬁanQwawiwﬂj
I

Discharge
Diagnosis

tr-‘a-m-th-A
_

...-A.Wn‘.m

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

.W---

85
Sh%

1?
26

29

”-

-.- —-”“—

w-

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

h2

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

hO-h9

3O

20

50+

M9

�‘— ‘7

-w vuwlr-u'rﬂmmm

—-u--

“Tm—“vii

W
Hm:

W.

21, man

911.13.

Hill-M- Wu}.
P. 0. Dan: 33
man Odes. the You:

W81
,
mm. mm
mmmlht:
MWWIMBWMbyaWo-n
I
whammmm'mmmmmmrmunm.
Midwinbutlmzldlﬂuewrymm
IMMMM
Mtﬁzhfwwblmw . Wumﬂulntdmﬁmfm
Wh.metMtoajml,ImﬂAlihto$smm-d
Hm,I
mmmmwmuwmmm.
singlubmmtittoamofﬁujwmmmwm
to .
81

FILE.

‘

‘

mm,mmmqumummxwmt
mwmumwtm-mmdtmjmw.
WWW.

ma:

�ﬂv

psychiatric treatment,
haMﬂm

and
research

December 2h, l96h

Dr.

Max

Fink

Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
Shoo Arsenal St.
St. Louis, Missouri
Dear Max:

(E)

/
(:&gt;

let,

the
have
reread
I
In reply to your letter
to
and
objections
my
original
paper on sociological aspects
the
skirts
I
feel
no
altered.
it
in
way
this paper are
whole problem of diagnosis which Nat in a previous paperwhich
and
than
social
class,
has shown to be more ;important
True,
variable.
be
crucial
a
VA
showed
to
I in the
paper
disturbed
more
severely
younger
same
institution
within the
of
time
period
a
and
longer
for
kept
patients are treated
and all this is relative to the philosophy of the
the
in
not
reported
at
all
is
This
viewpoint
institution.
paper.
form.
in
present
its
of
in
publishing
favor
not
it
I am
Should you have some specific need for seeing it published,
removed.
was
name
my
providing
no
objection
I would have
collaborate
to
want
should
you
authormanship,
of
Speaking
variables
and
psychological
EEG
and
psychiatric
on the
findings
I would have no objection.
My best wishes to you, Martha and the kids for a Joyous
New Year.
have
him
I
and
Turan
to
tell
Please give my regards
ordered a copy of his book.
Sincerely yours,
of the

10m»;

MP:gp

Pollack, Ph.D.
Senior Research Associate

Max

�m

21, 196‘!

mmmrmtmmmgm-ormw;md
fdﬂuMdmmm-Jmlofwmommﬁa
Mﬂlhdmlafhyuhhm. mﬁwmhﬁn
”magma-mum. hmmhmyw.

and:

Enema-mu
cc:

Pollack Ph.D.
Nathmial siegel, Ph.D.
Max

�MONTEFHMHCHUSPVRHJAND MEDHLMACENTER
111

EAST 210TH STREET. BRONX, NEW YORK 10467. TELEPHONE: 212/TU 1-1000

January 19, 1965

Fink,
Director

max

M.D.

Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
suoo Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:

I think the paper is fine, and would
touch it as little as possible. Your choice of
Journal is excellent. For my part, go ahead

and submit

it.

The only change concerns

the

here - "Mbntefiore Respital and
Mbdical Center" and the revised address as

revised

name

shown on

this letter.

It

to see you and I
pleased that you are doing well.
was good

am

Best regards to Martha.

Sincerely,

RLK:FB

Rdbert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Head, Section on Psyology
Division of Psychiatry

�DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION. AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
BETHESDA. MD. 20014

December 31, 1964

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
AREA CODE aoI
TEL: ass—mo

In reply refer to:

M-TMR-SS
AIRMAIL

Dr. Max Fink, Director
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal

Street

St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:

I was pleasantly surprised to see the paper on "Sociosociological Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals" again. I was
really delighted that you resurrected it and have taken responsibility
of submitting it to one of the journals that you listed. I have no
real preference for one of various journals that you mentioned. I would
think it would be most unlikely to be published in Psychiatry, but I
am sure you share this opinion since you listed it last in your order.

In all honesty, in rereading the manuscript, I found it to be much better
than I remember it. Most of my comments are of a stylistic nature. Here,
however, I would bow to you as the collator of the document to use the
style that you prefer. My own penciled comments are, however, on the
paper.

V/

I think the main contribution that this paper has to make, and should
make, has to do with the methodological problems that are involved in
doing cross-hospital studies or in doing hospital studies within the
same institution over a period of time. As you indicate in the paper,
on page 4, that when one reports studies from one institution, the
structure of the hospital is either taken for granted or ignored. Cer—
tainly, we should be elaborating on this in great detail, and the
methodological aspects of doing a study, such as the one we have done,
Should occupy a major area of the report in its own right. For this
reason, I am not sure I would report methodological problems as we have
done on page 4. I think that it should either occupy a place of its own
in the discussion or might indeed exchange status with "AH Interhospital
Comparisons on page 4, and become the "A" category, or interchange and
make Interhospital Comparisons the "#1" category. Most of the things
that we want to say are in the paper but, as I have indicated, I am a

�2.

little

unhappy about interweaving our "findings" with the "methodological

not being our intent in the original investigation
in
the
also,
report.
more
I,
important
the
I
being
think
...and, yet,
would
I
of
the
author
be
try to
should
senior
paper.
believe that you
own
in
and
autonomy
right
its
give
problems
it
methodological
the
spotlight
Section."
"Discussion
Section"
the
in
"Results
or
done
in
be
the
whether this

difficulties"...the latter

Cole
in
Jonathan
with
be
will
visiting
Please let us
the
evening
want
on
spending
us
to
plan
I
certainly
Washington again.
schedule
I
will
on
advance
notice
this
have
we
a
and
if
little
together,
know when you

my

time accordingly.

My

best to you

and your

family for a most happy 1965.

Sincerely,
Nathaniel H. Siegel, Ph. D.
Acting Chief, Social Sciences Section
Training and Manpower Resources Branch
National Institute of Mental Health
Enclosure

�M

L.

W.
liﬂunhﬂ.&amp;hﬂn1,Ith"

Kin. $.11...

MI!

nu!

Nu

m.

21.0.“

31.9.

�-n

mmw

—

vvr-nwr w)v-x&lt;v-'r

v

-,

—

1‘... er—‘u‘

-~

‘

m-vm.~—~v---ww—WVW-"— av uwvwx ':vtwv-‘uwvwav&lt;&lt; -... . &gt;rv—zwv-Inl“ . wt. u-vww-wmw—m—m‘ vv'vi'ﬁ‘mrr w 4w.—’wn’.~w—V'WWV

MIMmm-Mhmumwa
mwdwmm.mmm.
3.3..

mm.
m.
mummmc.r.mmwnwmhmmuy
m,mm.wmm~mmm~m.dmm
Mahatma). mmua. muss-mm; mun

mwammme-m
Lain.

mmmwam.
mmuumm.munmmm
Cmm: wmsmnwzm.
mm".
a:
mm mm mm mm.
W.
I“
3.2.

aWﬁdeW
memmammua:
mmwaw.m
mm.st.muis.m.
0‘

m.

Md.»

ray-12mm

�-

.

.

.

v.

v.,.‘,'.‘.- «r

«

:Vw’v mew—m—x— wwtr-rm'w-‘Mw—.nn-nwwvwwwmmw-v-v ... .. we» ~v .... *IJ- ‘v-r'
,

1:-

««..‘«.———»W.-.m»—7w....yu. nr__.4.;- “M...

——~m41‘7-~

-...—

n. Vr .. .

nmuwumwmmmmm
”1(1er

Wmmmwmmmm
mammawmmmwamwmmpmﬂnam
WW“). “W“ﬁwmﬂ”,

mam/1m [Yd/W
“'3"

MW!WMMNW%:W°¥IW.M 5 dz]
Wm
mam-rm.
Wren-(1.5).
.0.,WW.
ﬁr7sf‘“-“
‘

�.-—

wru- vv- "v... «- WMIwn—w

&gt;06." :u—

‘mkm:“"mvﬂw-w5-—rmw~r~vvb w,

wn-‘W-‘wnw-qm --. rtmmmnﬂ-FII .:- ;w~w-w——»,w-——W w...“ “-— v.W»—w——.~v— "ﬂ.Av—-HV»W‘WW‘W'WW"W—WI

“a“

Wummmdmmvmmmmmmm
mmm,mc.r.mmmummmmmmm
Wammmmmm. mmmmumm

WWW
WWW

ummmmmwmamwmm
WMMM
M M’Mmﬂ
'

[’2‘be (if #9»;

0/15th

aha/Me

.

whammmamnmm
wmmmmmmu.

mud-Wm.

mwmwwmmnmmmm.
MMWWmWMWWd
mmmmtmwmmmwnm.m.mumurm;

mm.

�,,,

—.»

,

.W—w ----~v-—-r-'

»*»-"—

"v

M

'-

wm;wmvmxv'"#w—

‘m-F-mu '«

"Hum—W.

«va-rn-w “.m—w—‘wvmmwm
»

.

\mer-r -m
a:

..

m

Amdmmmnammmmmmmmtm-

m~mmm,mm. WWMWWW

mmmw.nwmdmummw
MﬁWWmWWhMMWMw
denWWnn-Wmmwm:
WWW.
mmmmmwmm
«Mam-mm. mwmrmmmmm
Wanting-mushy.

mammmmmmmamm. MIW

www.mmummmmm-ammmdm
“Wummtﬁsymmmﬂmmhtddlnm
«www.mnmmmssnmmmmmm.
mmmmmmmmmorm'mmmm

”mmwummmmuwummm.

MWthm.m9£mW
MMMMMmWinm-m
mama-am.

www.mmmmy.hmmmammm

Mummmmmmmmmmama

mwum’mmmm
WWW
www.mummmjmvnﬂénmmmm

“a.

-

�. WV

‘ — ,- w-wmu. “kn-"n“,

A-

ham-w.”- VWWW—wmuwwum—mm

W
W
1-

mmmnmmimﬁmim.mmdﬁn

mimwhmfwmmdﬁwiwdwmdmm.
mmmmmmmmmmmn
mmmﬁmmum. mummmmmu

an

mumm.mmwmm.mmmly
mummmmwwmwmm. Wham

mmmmmmmorwammwmum»
ﬂm.mmmmﬁwm.
mmmmmmm

WWW
IWMMWMNWWMW,MM
met.
umwmmmmmum
«0

Wmummwuwwmmm
”twang-anus. mmummpmmammmm
Wmdmmwmm.
-Aemm1ammpwmymwmuummmmm

MW“MMM.M
nan-mm
mwmvmuwwmmmm.
cumin-aim.
Minimum.

'mmwmmmmmmmw
ummammmuwcmm.mmm.
mm.mmmm. mmamm
’

�,

n-

.m..

WV..—

Ww~

-

mw-«WWWWIWwv—mm wwmmw—mm

“Ir-V."

I. ‘“

mmmwmmmm'amwmwm
mmmwttmmmmummm
mW'mm’WwMW.
b.)

M:
wmmmmwmmm
MWWMWWMMWWV.

difﬁcult.

mmwmmmmmmm

mmmmmmmmnzwmmwmm
Moan-

mmmwmwmmmmm.

Wand’mm.

'1'th I

mmmmminmmm. mmmmmnmmm
WmmmuumasmmmumMammg'mm
Mammmmwumtmmm
“WW.

mmmmttmtmmmmmmdw
imamwwmmn).-MMsmmWW
mummmmmwmmmuw.
TIMI!

2.

mmmmmmmdmm.m,mam

�V v. .,_VW._..,_~_..,...._.V._

mwm wry“

r—‘um'wrp—

.

wwwnvmmm

NWFMWWmMMWhW
mum-m.
mm

mwmmwm
W:
.mmaunmmmmmw. mmmm

TITVZWL“

a)

@Wmmnywm;ummmw.m
:prj’ cam.
Mg'unwmmmm,mmxym

$0319”)

”ﬁg?
3":
3’1

if:4314,4'ZWMW

'0’
‘

.,_-

‘

Mmmmmmmmm
initiation-1
bug:

W.
pmmmmwmmm
,

m.’umwmmmamummmm
magma-macar-

mummmmm.
mwm.wmmmmm,cmynwmn

am
mm: Whﬁndmwmmm

unma- m 2: went

mad: mm.

mama-«aw
W‘rmmmm.

mmrmmm,mmymwmuimmd
sou-mu

mmrmmmammm
mm.ﬁmmmmdﬂn

aim
murmmmmmammmme
him”.

{

�.‘r “pm... 9

W mr—

mmmﬂwmmm‘

~wz.

.

‘-...-

WWWW-

mm‘mm

._

.

m,mwmm1nmm.mm
Wmmmmrswsmm.

W
W

”mus

WMtnmdwm-Wmmd

wrmumwmmm
mm.
s«

0

’

mm “W: mmm.nmmmuy

mmuumwmwmmmmw
mnm&lt;m3wmcammm.

mmmmm

m
«wwmmmww.ummotmm
w

wumnmuummmummm.

mmmwmwm.muuwmum

mmmwsmmnmwmmm
mmmdmmmammmmm
0mm.

mmmm—mwwmmmw
ummmuwm.
A,

Inmmlymmtum

mummwmuﬁwmm.
mm
mﬂmmugo
.

M:

WWm
“mawmmlyucMoMmAm‘
(19» of

'W‘wmw. mmmﬁw
memu-ummmmmu
(M)~mmnmywwmmm.

W”

MWWMW
Wm”: mm.MuW,mp-m
6)

mg:

mmmuuummm. mWW

mamummmm-mmmmmm,

m.—

�__

.

.

w~vwmvwﬁﬁn

mmwmwmmmmmammamm

www.m'w.

mammarwxmmmmmmmmm
WWW
mummmwmm.
mmmmmmgmm.mmmammm
Wmmctmw.
mmwmum,mmawmmmm

—-

I'm

.V-

lath-mm. mmrsmmmmmmumm

w.

.ﬂww‘

«mummmﬁmwmmmrmm

.

mmmmmwnmrmmnm.

demmammammnmm
Wum.mu~mmmummm

mmmpmuwmtmm
quh..-h1mtrmdm'mdd§nmmbhﬂwtmm
m-mw,mmammwmammw
mummiod.

'

Mam.

WV

��...

ww—nw—va—&gt;vwmmmm www.mmww- m“ mv—m—w—u—‘mwnwﬂ.

.—

“.mwmw

._‘ u...

_~wm.,

”minimum-mummy”

an.wmwﬂnndmbdﬂnm
mmmumwbymmmmmamw
mmmmmmmwmmmm

”.mmwwmmmmum

Mum.th.W1-NWW
mumuuﬁumdmmmm
“WW
dmwtymm'ummmmmm
mmmmmmmm‘mum. mammal-s

MWWW1&amp;.MHMWU)M‘MM
dWMWdMnIWMMm. MW

”MWWmmmddmﬁﬂu-inw
Want
www.mmm.m.mwm.

www.m.mmmmormm
mmmmmmmmmmm.
ithmIMymtﬂm-cﬂmmminmmnﬁm,m
A:

Wmmmmmdmmm.
MWWJWl-wdmm
”HWWMWMmmmmW.for
ummmmmummmmnmm.
uni-.WwﬂlhﬂﬂnMMYWw-RMW

www.mmmmmmuummm

WW.W{MM:“WWW

�Wan-alts.

nm,mm,Mhmmn-mm

mam.mmmmmmm.
«mmammngMu-mm.
mmwmammm.
mmmmmam‘nwm
arm-imam. mammm-Mdmmm

mutyofm.mmmtdmutyofmnmfw
manmmmmm. mmmm
mm'mmmmismm.mmmmmam

“mummmwrwmmdw
mummmmmwm.
ammwmmmc;),1tmwwm«m
mmawmmmmwmmmn
mum? Itmwm,wmmmmm
nmllymﬁminmmmﬂy,wiuaW‘sMn

Mummmmwmotmmmmdm
um.

“MMWWmMMWw
mummw.1tummmtmm

“mummwwwmmmm
«wamm'umtymmm;mmwm

mﬁnwﬁmﬂMMWWluuﬁ-«W
W“.w"mkimﬂmm'u mm.“

��“Vi—p.-.— «......,.“ym.—

“n WW... 7,“.u Irv-"ﬁrm“b'tw www.m-m

a».

.umw w», -..m--m.-.\mu~ urn—7”." w, m 7..” n- »~ .:.r~—nremw.n

Wme-mmmmmma
mmwmwmmmmmm

mum-.mmwmmmmwmmim

mmwmdmmmm.

�N"

a

man-wwmwrw

Wv-'ﬂ‘9""¥’:ﬂ1ﬂ'1w"v"’w

7)

‘

v.

w;1mmw‘n:-glm

v
,-.v.-

:.
v-y.

mun-rme

_,.

~

a.

n;'WK:=Vm4—_wr_nw-ytw;wtuv7~n.&gt;l.-.

war,

=W:

WW

EMWWW‘RR.
WWWWMWW.
1.

memmm.m.mmmrm.
MMNWWWMW.WMWWM.

WWWWWWQ
Wamwm.mdmm
WMWFM.MM*.
2.

MWMWWmmMm
ammfmbhcimmmrmmmd
3.

am.

mmmmmammmam
Wﬁmmmmﬂmmmﬁmmdm
Ii.

MWuwa-mw.

mammmmwmmummw
m.mawunuum.newmum
mmmtum.mmmmmwmdw
B.

wwwmmamnw

�REFERENCES

1.

and
D.J.
Sanford,
Levinson,
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E.,
&amp;
New
Brothers
York, Harper
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,
'

1950.
2.

Hollingshead, A.B.:

Two-Factor Index of Social Position,

mimeo—

graphed publication.
3.

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

Community

Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and Mental
&amp;
New
John
Sons, Inc.,
Wiley
York,
Study,

1958.

h.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

Hos2., g: 216-228, 1957.
S.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
and
Diagnosis,
Ratings
Discharge
of
Duration
HOSpitalization,

Kahn,

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
6.

l:

565—57h, 1959-

(CaliAttitude
Social
R.L., Pollack,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
J.
Dis.,
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
Scale)
fornia
M.

Kahn,

and Fink, M.:

129: 187—192, 1960.
7.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,

tion
Hospital,
and

8.

and
to
Diagnosis
Relation
Its
Amer.

J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, l9S9.

Siegel, N.H., Kahn, R.L., Pollack,
and Treatment

Psychiatric OrientaTreatment in a Mental

S. and Lefton, M.:

M.

and Pink, M.:

Social Class, Diagnosis

in Three Psychiatric Hospitals, Social Problems, 10: 191-196,

1962

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered
A

Markedly Improved

Much Improved

Improved

A

!

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Unimproved

Moderately Improved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comgarisons for Sociopsychological Variables

i

I

Social

Class

Years of
Education

III

Menninger

Hospital

Hillside
Hospital

:
I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
gMenninger Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health

iHospital

Center

'

of
Treatment

‘Psychotherapy

Type

68

Somatic

8

Other
1

.

_ﬂ,

__

Duration of

Hospitali—

zation

7-11 months
1

months

Improved

.--a-—u.~...w

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

lO

a,”

Discharge
Diagnosis

,

months

Recovered,

Discharge
Evaluation

~__imiu_i_.,i_.__.::-

.

”13:29-33
W

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

df=h~

5,1001
I

‘

”WWW”
85

22

1?

26

29

!

I

S2

1

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

£52
Below 20

Menninger

Hillsidg

81

he

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

ho-h9

30

20

3422219.

�'

&gt;

%&gt;

This study was done when the authors were associated at
the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hespital,
Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y., 1959-62.
Pal/sue aux!

KIRIM“
cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts
Health Center
the
is
The

acknowledged.

and

C.P, Menninger Memorial Hospital

Mental

gratefully

Aided, in part, by grants MY—2092 and MEI—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

** Present Address: Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore Hespitalaw*
’
'
{hxxﬁrtﬁF-itﬁfr
IO‘NAZI
g“ QM? 1.14:
0M yNL
nan
:
National Institute of Mental Health,

'M,

-ﬂﬂqmam pn--~~r~Ognv m.

Bethesda,

Md.

Department of Psychiatry

at the Missouri

Institute of Psychiatry ef-the-SChool of

Medicine, University ot’ Missouri, suoo
Arsenal Street, St. Louis) an, Ma, 6399'"!
,4

:9,

�In their studies of the

psychiatric patient population,
Hollingshead and Redlidh have reported significant relationships between an'
individual's position in the social class structure and the
of treated
New Haven

illness, types of diagnosed disorders
administered.(;%.
treatment

patient
.

The

and kinds and duration

W

of psychiatric

influence of the economic status of the

the availability of treating personnel, however, was not excluded.
Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of hospitalized

on

#‘Fﬁ‘

.

'

IﬂL

srﬂwu‘

patients independent of pateent‘s finances and the availability of treatments
were undertaken at Hillside Hespital in 1957. In this hospital, a variety of
treatment modes, including individual psydhotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive
therapies were available to

.

.

.

.

all patients regardless of their ability to

pay.

(Eglgé
In these surveys
we observed

that patients hospitalized for the shortest
periods were older, had less education and were more often of foreign birth.
These older, less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive
therapy and received more favorable clinical discharge ratings.

In contrast,

younger, native born and more educated patients were hospitalized for longer

periods, treated primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratings.
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy, the
'

California

F

’15’

Scale (1333. Higher

F

scores,

i.e.,

greater stereotypy, were often

in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis, who were referred for
convulsive therapy, hospitalized fOr shorter periods, and more often were
rated as much improved or‘recovered.
hen,
(gram)
e'
In thzs surveyglit was suggested that differences in psychiatric treat—
ment among hospitals should reflect the influence of social factors as noted
f0und

fbr the patients within Hillside HOspital.

To

test this suggestion

it was

�decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions

Hillside Hospital, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hespital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston. These institutions were selected
mm» Ww-Mans.:qum-W nag-MW

:

with the expectation that they served patients of different social classes.and-

provide custodial care. Each

supervisory

staff

and

is a residency training center with a full

active researCh units)

time

emphasiqgugsychoanalytically—
They

oriented psychotherqua
This study was designed to determine the population characteristics of

the three institutions with respect to social class, age, education and

score;

F

to relate these characteristics to treatment variables of type of treatment,
duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the in—
and

stitutions.
M'MWW,.,L..««Ila-mm?”

W/

“”‘MW‘WWW ”‘W

“’

m "' “

t4"

"M"

‘ﬂwwmwww

”‘

W

“m

«a

,

N,

WWW‘W,MM

——

�/
A

METHOD

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in

residence in the institu—

in January, 1959. While Manninger and Hillside Hospitals
had voluntary patients only, a small number of those at the MassaChusetts Mental
Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the courts for psydhiatric evaluation or
tions

was undertaken

of a chronic schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a
from
because
excluded
the
These
study
were
researdh
patients
project.
specific
of their non—voluntary status. The California F scale was scored for each

were members

patient

on

the census day.

Eighteen months

examined
were
of
records
the
disdharged
patients
later

to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure
of social class, the Hollingihead 2—factor index a.weighted score of education
used(g;ii;.The
and occupation was
study population consisted of 173 patients
—

—

at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
social
of
the
to the
The study included examination.of the relations
psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between institutions.
These comparisons were difficult however, because of various methodological
differences discussed below. These difficulties were most marked in the intra—
hcspital comparisons, and accordingly, in the analyses of psydhiatric variables
emphasis will be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
at Hillside,

100

at

Manninger and 95

intrainstitutional trends. These difficulties also led to missing infbrmation
1&amp;6/34 6, #2,
for some data, whidh is reflected in th varying population sample sizeslénrthe
4ﬁﬁﬂxeu

�RESULTS

I
Methodological Problems

A‘

When

reporting studies from one institution, the structure of the

hospital maybe taken forgranted and either ignored or mentioned briefly.

'W 1,,

e

comparable
gathering

gr;
m, _ M ”1111111....”
institutions
While
were selected as
these
data from.multiple institutions,
.

in teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific-problemscygf4LAt-Lk*
comparable

were prominent

tions,

in the designation of type of treatment, diagnostic classifica-

and the evaluation of treatment outcome.

criteria for designating that
differed among the institutions, making come

Designation of Eype of Treatment:

1)

a patient received ”psychotherapy"

[Sous

parehti=ay

The

difficult.

At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was designated as treatment

administered on a prescription basis by a

patient

was Charged

a fee.

staff psychiatrist for

whidh the

Sessions with the psychiatric resident were

con—

sidered part of routine administrative patient care.
'At Hillside Hospital psydhotherapy was defined as treatment sessions with

Staff psychiatrists did not treat patients, but
No
additional
resident
physicians.
restricted their activities to supervising
a psydhiatric resident.

fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was designated

aucha‘
functiggrof

psydhiatric residents, psydhologists,
social workers, nurses and medical students. Formal records of such sessions

as the

many

disciplines

-—

�which
ascertain
and
record
to
in
the
included
patient's
were not routinely
team
members
the
of
study
for
was
received
necessary
psydhotherapy it
patients

to interview the resident responsible for eadh case.
made
comparisons
diagnostic
styles
Individual
institutional
Diagnosis:
evaluative
the
multiple
employed
diagnoses
At
Menninger
Hospital
difficult.

10

dlil

the American Psydhiatric Association)while both
followed different unitary systems. Several examples of

scheme recommended by

Hillside and

MMHC

conversions
with
Table
suggested
in
our
I,
diagnoses from.Menninger are listed
con—
These
two
institutions.
other
of
the
that
into categories comparable to

versions provide a source of distortion.

at the
detail.
The discharge rating at Menninger
and
format
varied
in
three hospitals
Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological
53)

e Rat'

Disc

s of

rovement:

Ratings of improvement

Hillside Hespital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center
had global ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each
factor of the Menninger system (Table II). For this study the Menninger syndrome
and syndrome Changes.

rating

3. jﬁﬂv

was compared

to the global ratings of the other institutions.

"A, .16 (’30

waft/mm

Co

I. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age, education

�and California F Scale score among the

three institutions is presented

in Table III.

a)

Social Class:

The

institutions

composition of the three

the population

anticipated difference in social class
was observed.

was predominantly upper

At Menninger Hospital

class; at Hillside Hospital, middle

Massachusetts
Mental Health Center, predominantly lower
class; and at

class.
There were no differences

b) ége;

in age distribution in the

institutional populations.
c) Education:

The

populations also differed in educational attain-

ment, with patients having more years of education

at

than at MassaChusetts Mental Health Center. While

Ml

patients at

per cent of the
had not completed high school, only 32 per cent at

MMHC

Hillside and

23

per cent at Menninger did not graduate.

d) F Score:

Califbrnia

F

patients had
50

or above

below 30.

Differences in the distribution of scores on the

Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent of Menninger
F
—-

of stereotypy.

patients had

Menninger Hospital

F

scores below 30, and only eight per cent with scores of

the higher

F

scores being associated with higher degrees

In contrast, at Hillside thirty—one per cent of the

scores below

30

while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were

�Thus, thl=a=pa===d.differences in social

attainment and performance on the
#40;

F

class, educational

Scale were observed.
RELA'H u a.

These

differences permit a test ofkhypotheses oamannrnngdﬂxrirﬁeﬁﬁxwrtn?
sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables among these

institutions.
12.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment: Amongﬁinstitutions, significantly

at Menninger Hospital (”3%) received somatic therapy
than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV).
fewer patients
b)

DUration of H05pitalization:

The

three institutions

differed with regard to patient’s length of stay (Table IV). Patients

at

Menninger Hospital were

hospitalized longest, with

65%

of patients

remaining for twelve months or more, compared to 31 per cent of the

Hillside patients and only

per cent at the MassaChusetts Mental Health
Center. The modal stay of the Hillside group was between seven and
eleven months while two-thirds of the MMHC patients were disdharged
5

within six months of hospitalization.
c)

Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most patients were

evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved" (Table IV). At
Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of
were

rated as "unimproved" and only a single patient

"recovered" or "much improved".

or

"much

The

was

patients
scored

highest percentage of "recovered"

inproved" ratings (28%) and the lowest proportion of

"unimproved" (10%) were found

d)

Diagnosis:

groupings were made:

at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.

For

statistical analysis three diagnostic

schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psycho-

neurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic propore

tions of patients within these groups were similar for Hillside and

MMHC,

�as slightly more than

half

were diagnosed as schizophrenia and one-

In contrast , at Menninger

quarter as psychoneurosis or affective disorder.

Hospital psychoneurosis and personality disorder accounted for more than

fifty per cent of the population.

6.

Intra—Hospital Comarisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of populations,
1......an
size
and
1::
the
sample
each
within
institution
homogeneity
their
dgghb
A
$31“ Lou-T
precluded adequate intra—hospital comparisons . everal groupings were
The

WW
Jr”)
W

obtained which had fewer than five cases)
.

.

.

.

94

z

5/

the trends appeared similar to those found

in the earlier study.

Age and F

score were found related to the selection

of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher
more

and
somatic
therapy),
receiving
frequently

F

P

score patients

score alone at Hillside.

both
the
related
at
and
were
chronological
of
age
hospitalization
length

Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for
the longest periods, While such relationships were significant in these
MMHC
V)
where no
(Table
noted
the
was
at
trend
similar
two hospitals, a

Menninger and

patients over

40 ,

but 1% of patients under the age of

than a year.
————_———_——

20

remained longer

�DISCUSSION

Q

,

M

daM
SOClal variables—95

1:11:
differences
in
Significant interinstitutional
of
distribution
in
not
but
age;
years of

education/W97

;

F

?

{”1238

MN

3

WI
}

kw

of
eva‘aaeed
periods
shorter
lower
class
patients
the institution serving
Eta
and
ﬁeportions
diagnoses
of
low
psychoneurotic
“better
,
hospitalization,
discharge evaluations. \
ment are

ﬁuw

$7,

memm‘

;

(M

I

and
complex
more
diagnoses
of
psychoneurotic
of stay, a higher proportion
a
forms
somatic
receiving
of
patients
diagnostic schemataalower proportion
“in
Similarly,
yere-eaeh-eonﬂmed.
ratings
and
discharge
of therapy,
poorest

r“

“3

{2/

MW
W
,

”ﬂ
033°”

“5:

f
Wtuw W

—variables
treatment
the
each
of
and
F
in
California Scale scores;
duration of hospitalization, selection ff treatments and distributions
“MM:
Maﬁa—5’
in—
e
of diagnoses and discharge evaluations.
..._v,.__~__~_.'/l\——".~W-v
J!
A
.
.
.
.
duration
the
longest
class
patients
stitution serVing upper
'

f""\

9’

«mean

related Ato

differences in staff attitudes

than—to—

“errences

in populations . 'Ihe contrasts between institutions in
duration of hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
and
of
evaluations
psychotherapy,
formulations , discharge
, definitions
lﬂese
differences
recorded
data.
amount
and
stylistic
of
details
the

W

wwﬁ‘sﬁssed as slinky idiosyncratic1am they follow a pattern
M,
W
related to social

{W
WW; meabmx/Wm
ﬁg “W434.
differences] consistent7with

.

�-10-

Such population and treatment

variable relationships are

Cf the physician
attitude
the
both
determined
by
interactive processes ,

and the administrative

staff

and by the
Such

constellation of

symptoms

or

relationships are marked most

history which patients present.
least
are
criteria
where
diaglostic
conditions
those
in
psychiatric
known
of
diseases
defining
criteria
where
objective
i.e.
specific,
,

ﬂ

personality
schizophrenia,
in
psychoneurosis/
etiology are absent, as
AAA-0L
of
conditions
perceptual a:
Under
these
disorders.
and behavior
and
expectations
attitudes
observer's
the
situational ambiguity)
Ak444~0u4,

become 5
I4

v

"uuﬁ situation was
Eris
his perception
classification)
6
.
. .
.
study
their
and
(1)
lefton
in
Dmitz
Pasamanick,
clearly emanated-by
observed
They
institution.
within
a single
of variations in diagnosis
in
did
differ
wards
not
type
different
to
assigned“
that patients

g4en¢bh ' o

dew

S ’and'

~qu

réaedéup

_

M

’1

Significant
residence.
education,
or
age
marital
status,
of admission,
diagnostﬁé
Cewif‘UI-Lﬂvarious
of
incidence
differences did occur, however, in the
among

the three wards and
m
'

believe theﬁ reflect the

among

differences

attitu

W

ward.
one
on
administrators
three

As

(“E

in the populations/ we

es 0 the examiners.

”atclinical evaluation

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis par”

another.
to
institution
have little
For
results
.
roduces
paradoxical
literal adherance to these concepts
meaning when

example, Menninger

transferred from

one

M
mhighly trained personnel
Hospital has—themes;

con—

3%

has
“fewest
the
for
longest
patients
its
keeps
time/and
ducting treatment,
the
poorest
Ad
reports
yI.’
yet,
as
diaglosed
schizophrenia,
patients

I

i
I

�-11-

treatment results.

,ﬁt'MMHC,

in contrast,

whiCh

is

most inclusive

in

defining a therapist, which keeps patients for the shortest periods,
and whéeh-has a higher-proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,

OV’

quality of carefnnop the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions)‘ Since the evaluations are
based on the institution's own ratings, we believe that the differences

reflect variations in the criteria used for evaluation of
rather than.§gy intrinsic psychiatric Characteristics.
In our

criteria of

initial Hillside

it was

postulated that different

utiliZed fer persons of different social
suggested that the higher the person's social

improvement were

It

baCkground.

study (‘)

improvement

was

the more complex the

cr1ter1a.enm3i?:§é*£lgis has‘::§&amp;;1
background
literally confirmed in the present study, WithAMenninger‘EluSIng a

to the global rating of the other two institu—
considering the syndrome rating on whidh our comparative

tripartite rating
tions.

Even

statistical

compared

analyses were based,

it is

our contention that fOr lower

class persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper class
persons the

criteria

emphasize sudh complex intangibles as "developing

insight", or "working through one's problems."

�-12_

demonstrated
the role of
While these investigations have again

social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed
by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These
selected for their educational leadership and the
expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly defined. But
differences in institutional style made it difficult to obtain comparable

institutions

were

data. This experience is a cue to the problems of the conventional use

of comparative statistics, especially in the evaluation of psychiatric

therapies.

The use

of disdharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or

length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the
identification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and

style as well as social class patterns in patient populations.

ﬁkrteﬁéeve———

difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories,
lack of confirmation may reflect differences in populations and
criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use

confirm

’Ehese

for the
psychiatric
of the

terns "schizophrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore changes in psydhological
and biological features of mental illness has led to-;:;1mnanadrthgr
6;Z;é
science burdened by negative results.
a valid observation to be

“40W
reported from one laboratory{ the methods armhamﬁaaﬁeélable—teéay to
Judy.”

«(no—c..-

(adeduately)describe psychiatric populations for an=adiqnuta==nnfinm==éan.
//*~—~.“www.m“imm.
“WM.,.,.--M—«~~WW"
c

M

4;,Aaanéigzgedai7

.

:

54; fggﬁ"JR;¢”;'
2%;7*"/;?

E

�~13.

fzar
Increased attention must be paid to thenaathedniogéoairprebiemSuei—-V4-’
3

w,
a
by "objective" criteria rather than the present
methods, so highly dependent on institutional and observer attitudes
and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

$nn“
g
cla881fyiag sub ects
‘

.

o

a

9

a

�-1u-

WW
SUMMARY

and

“Wu-I

2

@1

MW

VoLu u'!

three

CONCLUSION

MWHw.» m...»

(A

a.

teaching hospitals,
W,~.mm~__1_ ""“"Wm.m...“
mmwv— vm l.»/
ﬁopulation characteristicsjig-ererelated to treatment variables

W

,.. .

.,

wwmm

MN

defined by social class, age, education and F score ,
W
type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,

TfZM
(W
Washed-#0

W

diagnosis and discharge evaluation.

Z

interinstitutional

:da—
differences were observed in

patient social class , years of education and
California
F scores , but not age.
distribution of

@

variations in treatment characteristics among institutions were found—$0.435; significantly different in the predicted

‘2,

The

direction.

'%

6

“Q

variations in psychiatric practices follow a pattern
among’f‘institutions
withgocial
and are
consistent
class differences
These

not regarded as idiosyncratic.

6g

‘Eae

differences in institutional style

make comparisons

of

between
and
treatment
duration
results
of
diagnoses,
hospitalization,
institutions difficult and tenuous , and the need for more objective

criteria

4w 4C1

ff

classification

(

0

ne‘kﬁ‘m‘v)

emphasized.
is
pppulations
A

�REFERENCES

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik,

Authoritarian Personalitz.

The

990 pp.

3.

Communit238tudz.

J.

and Sanford, R. N.
Harper and Brothers, New York, 1950,
D.

Class and Montal Illness:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, T933, KHZ pp.

Hollingshead, A. B. and
A

E., Levinson,

delich, F. 0. Social

L., Pollack, H. and Fink, M. Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Montal Hospital. J. Hillside Hos ., 1957, Q; 216Kahn, R.

228.

h. Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Pink, M. Sociopsychologic Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Montal Hospital: Duration of Hospi-

talization,

;:

565-5714.

Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis. Arch. Gen Ps

hiat.,

1959,

S. Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, H. Social Attitude (California F
Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. Mont. Dis., 1960, 1;_: 187—192.

Pasananick, 3., Dinitz, s. and Lofton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and
its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital. Amer. J.
P

hiat.,

1959, gig: 127-132.

7. Siogel, N. H., Kuhn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, H. Social Class,
Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals. Social Problems,
1962, 19: 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

-WM_W_

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

InterhosEital

III

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Menninger

Hospital

I

Hillside
Hospital

1

Massachusetts
Mental Health

s

2

§

a

3

1
1

Social

Class

III

E

17

3b

‘

z

g

i

g

1

i

i

3

i

l

!

z
~,

Years of
Education

llZ—lS

;

%

i
a

3
I

F

Score

5h

'13

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
;Menninger [Hillside Massachusetts

{Hospital [Hospital Mental Health

of
Treatment

Type

'Psychotherapy
Somatic

68

Other

8

I

Duration of

7-11 months

Hospitali—

W

zation

months

WWW..-”—

mmm
-w
-

1

*-

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

Improved

61

Unimproved

10

.

i

Discharge
Diagnosis

.

,

I

mewmm

001
-.......’32_.L.__.......B&lt;
_....

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

(95)

(171)

I

(85

5h%

17

�TABLE V

Duration of HosEitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

l»
mm

Below 20

Menninger

Hillsidg

81

he

73

36

61

30

3O

20

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks,

L.I.

New

York, 195941962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial
"
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The

‘

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

*9':

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In

their studies of the

psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded,
New

Haven

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to pay“ In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birthc These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings. In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratings,
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i.e,, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recovered.
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that dif—
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital, To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -— Hillside
Hospital, the C. Fo Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston» These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classesc
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapyo

istics

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,

score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions”
education and

F

�-2“
METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo—

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
statusc The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center»
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trends" These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in.the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

ﬂ...

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
tioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institu~
tions, however, the many differences between institutions are accentuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study, Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome;
When

*—

1. Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult,
At Menninger

criteria for

differed

among

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia—

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident“ Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicians, No additional fees were charged,
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
was designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psycho~
was necessary for members of the study team to interview
therapy

it

the resident responsible for each case.

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric

Association, while both Hillside and

followed different unitary
systemsa Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
MMHC

�Table I

3. Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of imr
provement at the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II). For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other

institutions.

Table

B.

Inter-hospital

II

Comparison

1. Sociopsychological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

in.

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observed. At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduatec
c) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty-one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
cent with scores of 50 or above -— the higher F scores being assoc—
iated with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 300
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed, These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables
2a

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV).
a)

three institutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)Q
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
b) Duration of

Hospitalization:

The

group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
MMHC
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV)o At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved” and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"e The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved” ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved” (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV)w The diag—
nostic preportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per—cent of the
populationo

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital com—
parisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsideo
Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periods,
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year.
The

Table

V

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the
examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to anothere Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results,
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment resultso
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social backgroundo It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployed° This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems.”
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapiese The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables included type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions,
~Simi1arly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the institutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula—
tions is emphasized°
These

�REFERENCES

E., Levinson, D. J. and
Authoritarian Personality. Harper and

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik,

Sanford,

Brothers,

R. N. The
New

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

York, 1950, 990 pp.
A. B. and

Illness:

A

Redlich, F.

C.

Community Study°
New York, 1958, 442 pp.

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.

Kahn, R.

J. Hillside Hosp.,
.

1957, 6: 216-228.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
G
Ps
Diagnosis. A
a ., 1959, A; 565—574.
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

Social Attitude (CalScale) and Convulsive Therapy. ligjﬁuabhlkuug_jn§,,
M.

and Fink, M.

1960, 13Q5 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
1959, 116: 127—132.
Hospital.

Whig”

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality
Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comgarisons for Sociogsxchological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
I

Class

"I“

Hospital

7%

II

20

III

34

IV

34

V

5

x2 = 121.5; df=8:

I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

lllllﬂaiﬂllllllIlllﬂﬂﬂﬂﬂlllll

N

Social

Hillside

_

p:(.001

“M“-0__-____—_‘-.i-____.__..1-____—___
19%

20- 39

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4g p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
§Menninger
N

T

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

mum-.mHospital

Type of

Hillside

Psychotherapy

Hospital

36%

re atment Somatic
Other

=82 8 df=4
100

N

Duration
of

Hospital—

ization

7

months

7-11 months

.

~11 months

Recovered,

Much

.001
173

95

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

90. 6 df= 4

X2=

.

.001-

Improved

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

2903' df=4.

U&lt;n001

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

23.8' df=4° .&lt;.001

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L. I. New York, 1959— 1962.

Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C. F. Menninger Memorial
Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
The co.operation of Dr. Max

Aided, in part, by grants My—2092 and MY-2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
.Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich have reported significant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excludeda

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hosPitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including in—
dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to pay, In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratingso In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingsm
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i;gf, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredu
In the survey reported here, it was suggested that differencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospital» To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -- Hillside
Hospital, the C. F, Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Bostono These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
equally available, yet served patients of different social classeso
Each provided short-term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care. Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapya

istics

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,

score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutionsa
education and

F

�METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo-

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non-voluntary
status. The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2—factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center,
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutions, These comparisons were difficult however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital may be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
tioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institutions, however, the many differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific dif—
ferences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome,
When

1, Designation of Type of Treatment: The
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy"
the institutions, making comparisons difficult.
At Menninger

criteria for

differed

among

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia—

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a fee, Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident, Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedu
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy

designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical studentso
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

2. Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric

Association, while both Hillside and

followed different unitary
systemso Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
MMHC

�‘1

Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of imw
provement at the three hosPitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)o For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
39

institutions.

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
1. Sociopszchological Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental

Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—'
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduate,
c) Education:

The

Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty-one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
the higher F scores being assoc—
cent with scores of 50 or above
iated with higher degrees of stereotypya In contrast, at Hillside
thirty-one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 30,
d) F Score:

——

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainﬁ
ment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These diff—

erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables among these institutionse
2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables

Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV)c
a)

three institutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)O
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center, The modal stay of the Hillside
b) Duration of

Hospitalization:

The

group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
MMHC
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation:

PA

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV). At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved", The highest
percentage of "recovered" or ”much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disorder, In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty per-cent of the
populationo

Table IV

C.

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillside. Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periodso
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year.
The

Table

V

�-7DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter'institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment variables -- duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7)¢
The

,r‘

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmedo The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions”
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populations° The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data, While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 3223, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorders, Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution,
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residenceo Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications

among

the

three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical results, For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results,
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutions,
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi—

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background, It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployed, This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
In our

compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statis—
tical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."

While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�f’.

leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapies, The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological fea—
tures of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in"
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distribution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psycho—
neurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
»Similar1y, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods cf hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the
stitutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
These

in—

differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula—
tions is emphasizedo
Such

�REFERENCES

E., Levinson, D. J. and
Authoritarian Personality. Harper and

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik,

Sanford, R. N. The
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

.

A. B. and

Illness:

Redlich, F.

C.

John Wiley and Sons,

Community Study.
New York, 1958, 442 pp.
A

Social Class and

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216-228.

Kahn, R.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
HOSpital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
G
PS h
565—574.
15
Diagnosis.
1959,
.,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink,

M.

Social Attitude (Ca1-

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. .lLJkﬂubnlkﬂug_DLi-,

1960, 139; 187-192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Am£I4_Ja_2£¥£hiaL., 1959, 116: 127—132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, 195 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosRital Comparisons for Sociogsychological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
N

I

Social

Class

‘“

Hillside
Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IllllﬂliillllllllIIIIIIIHEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZIIIIIIIII
31%

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34

IV

1

34

V

0

5

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p&lt;(.001

“M

1IIIIiIiﬂiiIIinjﬂﬁniiiiiﬂiiiiﬂiijﬁiiiiiIIIIIIIMIBIIIIIIIII
19/

20- 39

=

Years of

Educatio

3. 9; df= 4; p=n. s.

&lt; 12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05

IIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEﬂIIIIIIII
F

Score

x2 =

33%

20%

50

38

17

42

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�W

TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
{Menninger

Hospital

N

Type of

Treatment

Psychotherapy
Somatic

Other

Duration
0t

Hillside
Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

21%

36%

24%

43

64

68

36

-—

8

7-11 months

Hospitallzatlon ~ll months

Recovered,

Much

Improved

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
nimproved
X

=

Schizophrenia

2903. df=4.'&lt;0001

52%

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

22

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

26
X

=

23.8. df=4. .&lt;0001

54%

17

29

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Ass

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

40-49

30

20

50+

36

MMHC

14

�Herch 12. 1965
Dr. Hetheniel Siegel. Ph.n.

lecionel Institute of Hentel Beelth
Bethesde. Ketylend

Deer nets:

I have sooepted ell your recommendations end heve redone this report.
Enclosed ere e for copies which, while they still may hsve e typographiosl error, ere in e for: which ooold he sent to s publisher. I have
taken the liberty of running this off on Colitho pletos. so the: if it
is not published, we may still have some copies for our friends.
Unless I hes: from you or receive s stop order. I will send e copy
of this to the Archives of Geoersl Psychiatry.
My best regards.
Sincerely yours.
Me: Pink. H.D.

H131-

Professor of Psychiecry

�Hutch 12. 1965

Dr. Robsrt L. Kuhn, Ph.D.

Division of Psychiatry
antstiora Hospital and Medical Cents:

Ill

Esau 210th 8tssst
Riv York, ﬂaw York 10667

Dear Bdb:

Following all tha recommendations in our last discussion, I have
accepted the full responsibility for this draft. Recognizing the snotionsl problems involvsd. I hsvn deleted
nsas. In this drsft. I
have sssuusd tbs senior authorship insofar as you seen to be ralactsnt
to do anything with the doeumsnt. It you would lihs, I will has. the
first psgs radon. sad hsvs this subnictsd to tbs Archivss of Gsuarsl
Psychiscry. with you ss senior author.

st's

It I

tsctory.
My

do not has: from you.
and submit
ss
is

it

it

I will assume that this drstc is satisto Dr. Grinksr.

best rsgsrds.
Sincerely yours,

Iink, H.D.
frofsssor of Psychistry

Ms:

31:3:

�MONTEFIORE'HOSPPTAL.AND MEDICAL UHETHR
111

EAST 210TH STREET. BRONX. NEW YORK 10467. TELEPHONE: 212/TU 1-1000

March 15, 1965

Fink, M.D.
Professor of Psychiatry
Department of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
University of Missouri
5h00 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri

Max

Dear Max:
Thank you for sending me the draft of the "Three Hospitals" paper.
I can understand your deleting Max's name since he never seemed able
accept this organization of the material. I would appreciate
however, if my name were restored as senior author when the paper
is submitted for publication. I do not, in fact, feel "reluctant"

it,

to handle it, and if you wish, I am quite prepared to arrange for
publication. I have no objections, however, if you wish to submit
it to Dr. Grinker first with myself as the senior author.

I notice

from your

letterhead that you are

now

a professor at the

university of Missouri. I hope this change will be beneficial to
your professional interests. You certainly have my best wishes.
Regards

to Martha.
Sincerely,

34;,

Hebert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Head, Section of Psychology
Division of Psychiatry
RLK:DCS

to

�April 1,

1965

Robert L. Kain, Ph. D.

Division of Paydmiatzy
Hmtefiom Hospital and Hndical Cantor
111 East 210th Strut
Bronx,

Haw

York

10%?

DurBob:

Mummftisenclmod.andithasgmctonn

Wrinthisfom
Idohopohaceeptait,becauseit
is me of tho
intcmsting nm-bioloﬁeal studies in

m
participated.
MWMWMW.mImﬁndmlf
inapooitimsimilartomatmichlheldinmsa.

whidx we have

Waterman burdms

The

are minimal and palate exclusively to

mymstudiu. Immhawadaiewdawdmofindepondmca
fwmamhwithamatdulofauﬂmvityoverpatimtn.
staff.md£acilitius. WMIcm-mhemﬂxingofthis
Ihaveafew excellent oomrkcm,but
mlytimwill
tell.
have

none

the stimulation and imginatim that you exhibited.

Max
14?: fun

Fink,

PLD.

Professor of Pug/wintry

�DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION. AND WELFARE
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
BETHESDA. MD. 20014
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
AREA
aoI
TEL: ass—mo

coo:

March 17

2

1965

In reply refer to:

M-TMR-SS
AIRMAIL

Dr. Max Fink
Professor of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry

‘

University of Missouri
5400 Arsenal

Street

St. Louis, Missouri 63139

Dear Max:

for the colitho copies of the "Sociopsychological"
It looks fine and I hope that it will be accepted by

Thank you

paper.
the Archives of General Psychiatry.

I have been in touch with some of our training grantees in
Missouri, making the Missouri Institute of Psychiatry more
visible to them as a research source. I hope that some
cooperative endeavor may result in the not too distant future.

Please keep in touch, and give

my

best regards to Martha.

Sincerely,
Nathaniel H. Siegel, Ph. D.
Acting Chief, Social Sciences Section
Training and Manpower Resources Branch
National Institute of Mental Health

�April 1.

1985

Mamie). a. 31.91, PM).

Acting Chief, Social 801m Sectian
Training and Hammer Ramon Bunch
National Institute of bats). Health
Dapu'mmt of Health, Edtmtim. md Welfm
Bethesda, Maryland

Dar Nat:
After- scnﬁng copies of the aociopsychological paper to
Bob, he indicated apnfomce forbeing the scalar auﬂm.

Implmodtocxooodtohiswish,mdmcloeediaaoopy
ofﬁte “pm wiﬂatmmvisod fact sheets. Ampysimmrto

this has

gone

to the Amhim.

811ml}; yaks,
Max

HP-zjn

Pink,

1-1.1).

Manor of. Psychiatry

�March 30. 1965

lobbins,
stis
Msdicsi Dirscror
Hillside Hospital
Dr.

P. O.

Box 38

Glsn Oaks,

Haw

K. D.

York

Dost Lev:
During ths

wists: usstings

discussed this study and

esrion.

we

Bob Xshn,

I
for publi-

Nst Sisgcl and

ssrssd to prepsrs

it

linsl drsft is enclosed for

your infornstian. Vs hsvs
tsksn rhs liberty of sabnirring this to Dr. Grinksr for his
A

consideration for publication in tbs
copy

I!

to

Agghgve .

it

sdvissbls. I would be plesssd to ssnd
you dssl
snyons you sugzsst st tbs Heaninxsr Foundation.
Sincsrsly yours.

link, H. D.
Protsssor of Psychiatry

Ms:

ﬁrst,

s

�Hatch 30. 1965

Dr. Jack Ewslt, H. D.
Prefessor of Psychistry
Massachusetts Hunts! Esslth Cantor
72~76 Yenwood Rosd

Boston, Hassschnsstts
Dear Dr. Ewslt:

s conpsrsttve study was undertsksn with
the Massachusetts Mental Baslth Conner as s coopsrstins institution. A finsl copy of tbs ropes: of thst study is sneloscd.
we have tsceLvsd psruisston to publish this inforustion from
Sons years ago,

Dr. Grssnblstt.

WW-

I an writing to tell

for consideration

I

would bu

by tho

you

tbs: us hsvs submittsd this drst:

plssssd to hsvs your con-sacs.

Sinesrsly yours.

Ms:

rink, u.

D.

Profsssor of Psychiatry

lltkp

�March 30, 1965

as. Roy R. Grinkar, Sr.
lbpartnent of Psychiatry
Michael Reese Hospital
micago, Illinois 60616
Dear Dr. Grizﬂcer:

I

the opportmity to enclose two copies of a
report "Socioysychological Aspects of Psychiatric Tmatmnt
in Emma Voluntary Hospitals" for your consideration for
publicatim in the Archives.
am tall-dug

We report mmmts a study mdertaken some years
ago by my associates and myself at the Hillside Hospital.
We have decided to submit 'ti'xis for
publicatim, in View of
the continued interest in the social aspects of diamonis
and manhunt.

Sincerely yours,
Max Pixﬂc, M. I).

Professor of Psychiatry

3‘?

�Harvard Medical School
Department of Psychiatry

Boston
Fenwood
Road,
021 I 5
74

l
l

l

Massachusetts Mental Health Center

[plllllllllllllllllll3M“; ljlllllllllll!!llﬂlH

.
ugﬁﬁrﬂiﬁ
a:

g

2:”

l

(Boston Psychopathic Hospital)

ill

Department of Mental Health

W”

”H"

u:
‘

Flak-.215

.-:::.!'1|

"

x2.mumuillméw

JACK

R. EWALT, M.D.

3mm PROFESSOR or PSYCHIATRY
SUPERINTENDENT

April

5, 1965.

Dr. Max Fink

Professor of Psychiatry
Mi ssouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
Dear Max:
Thank you for the copy of your study of the Hillside
Menninger's MMHC. I found it very interesting and, considering the
differences particularly between this place and Menninger's, I am impressed with the way you could tease out comparable elements. I would
hope some energetic person would about ten years after the first study
do a repeat on the same three institutions, using as near as possible the
same criteria to see what directions or shifts if any had taken place
be
would
directional changes
that
there
I
them.
strongly
suspect
among
in all three but the differences you found would probably persist.
Si

ely

�w. -.

m.

.V

1n: vv “

quI’V—nw

W", waw w':——'-1.17W . VF... s ”pamn— w...“ -mrmwmwv 4w-uw1-w‘rr ,_....v , .
—

Jun. 3,

up. lbbart

1..

New

. .4,

,

.«.—-~w "w ‘v.'rr .. «q many

1965

Rain

Division of Psychiatry
Hawaiian Win). and
1.11 East 210th 3m“:

M York,

”ﬁn—“W.

hated.

Cantor

York 16%?

DaanublndNat:

Hm:

Firm,

1!. 1).

Professor of Paydﬁatry

many
an:

HAW Sign. Hm}.
Mimi Imam of m1 Knuth

m,

mm

a“

m:«mv-:~,&lt;muvw; vn‘w‘u‘w‘rv

v

V

..

,...

�PROCESSING OF

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
Each accepted manuscript is processed
in the Chicago Editorial Offices of the
Archives of General Psychiatry bringing
together all elements of the printed pages
of the final published article.
You will receive a reproduction of the

typescript, edited according to the official
AMA Style Book, for final review and approval. There will be no galley proof.

is accepted with the
understanding that it may be necessary to
make minor revisions, or to request changes
in illustration or text.
Your manuscript

The Editors

�SAMPLE

DETACH

SAMPLE

AUTHOR(S) (AND ONE ADDRESS): R. K. Merchant and .I. P. Utz

1200 Blank Street, Chicago, Illinois 60610

TITLE: Familial Sarcoidosis
(Name of) JOURNAL: Archives of Internal Medicine

Sarcoidosis was observed in a mother and her daughter. The criteria for this diagnosis
included (1) a compatible clinical picture, (2) granulomatous inflammation with little
or no necrosis and the absence of demonstrable microorganisms to specially stained
sections of biopsy material, (3) negative cultures, particularly'for acid-fast bacteria
and fungi, of appropriate body fluids, exudates, and surgically excised granulomatous
tissue, and (4) apositive Kveim test. These cases of sarcoidosis, together with 73
others involving more than one member of each 32 families, suggest the possibility
that a complex hereditary trait is operative in the pathogenesis of Sarcoidosis.

�w

DETACH

.

INVITATION...TO PREPARE AN ABSTRACT OF YOUR COMMUNICATION WHICH
WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR PUBLICATION .IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN
MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

Suggestions:

.7.

1. Type name(s) of author(s) (also address of one of the authors),

title of article

and name of journal in which the original article appears.
2. Type

abstract on attached card and mail promptly:

a) Indicate purpose, extent, kind of study, materials and methods used.

chiefly to new data—the high points—informational, not descriptive;
criteria,
technics,
diagnostic
new
new
new
new
statistics,
apparatus,
e.g.,
new evidence, new preventive measures, a new theory,new treatment.Do
not use abbreviations.

b) Refer

3. The

abstract should not exceed 200 words.

NOTE: Accepted abstracts will be printed concurrently with publication} of the original

article.

PLEASE TYPE

THIS IS THE ONLY REQUEST

PLEASE RUSH

�DETACH
PREPARE AN ABSTRACT OF YOUR COMMUNICATION WHICH
I LL BE CONSIDERED FOR
IiIVITATION...TO
PUBLICATION IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN
EDICAL ASSOCIATION.

Suggestions:
1. Type name(s) of author(s) (also address of one of the authors),

title of article

and name of journal in which the original article appears.
2. Type

abstract on attached card and mail promptly:

a) Indicate purpose, extent, kind of study, materials and methods used.
b) Refer

chiefly to new data—the high points—informational, not descriptive;
e.g., new statistics,new apparatus, new technics, new diagnostic criteria,
new evidence, new preventive measures, a new theory,new treatment.Do
not use abbreviations.

3. The

abstract should not exceed 200 words.

NOTE: Accepted

article.

PLEASE TYPE

abstracts will be printed concurrently with publication} of the original
THIS IS THE ONLY REQUEST

PLEASE RUSH

�SAMPLE

DETACH

SAMPLE

——————————-———————‘_

AUTHOR(S) (AND ONE ADDRESS): R. K. Merchant and J. P. Utz
1200 Blank Street, Chicago, Illinois 60610

V.

TITLE: Familial Sarcoidosis
(Name of) JOURNAL: Archives of Internal Medicine

Sarcoidosis was observed in a mother and her daughter. The criteria for this diagnosis
included (1) a compatible clinical picture, (2) granulomatous inflammation with little
or no necrosis and the absence of demonstrable microorganisms to specially stained
sections of biopsy material, (3) negative cultures, particularly'for acid-fast bacteria
and fungi, of appropriate body ﬂuids, exudates, and surgically excised granulomatous
tissue, and (4) apositive Kveim test. These cases of sarcoidosis, together with 73
others involving more than one member of each 32 families, suggest the possibility
that a complex hereditary trait is operative in the pathogenesis of Sarcoidosis.

�*Kahn, R.L., Fink,
,

dd
d
THOR
s
*‘blijvisioé 3f(?3yc?1'i%€ryf°ﬁgntefiore
“

M.

and Siegel, N.

10467)
Hospital,
St.,
TFFLE:Sociopsychological Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three
JOIHHWAL: Archives of General Psychiatry
Voluntary HOSpitals.
Population characteristics, defined 5y social class, age, education
and F score, were related to treatment variables in three voluntary
teaching hospitals, Hillside Hospital (N.Y.), C.F. Menninger Memorial
111 E 210

NY

Hospital (Topeka), and Massachusetts Mental Health Center (Boston).
Treatment variables included type of treatment, duration of hospitalizaThe
and
evaluation.
institutions differed in
discharge
diagnosis
tion,
of education and distribution of California
class,
years
patient social
1
but not age.
EF scores,
had
the
The
class
longest
g
patients
serving
institution
upper
p
psychoneurotic diagnoses &gt;
quration of stay, a higher proportion of lower
of
patientg
Idand
a
schemata,
complex
proportion
more
diagnostic
(I)
the
dischar
e
of
fo
oorest
an
somatic
ther
rati
receivi
Eamong tﬁé three instfgﬁtions. €¥§i1ariy, thg institution sgrving “gs
m
of
had
the
shorter
hospitalization,
periods
class
patients
glower
m
lower proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better
discharge evaluations.
Psychiatric treatment and management practices differ among
institutions according to the prevailing social class characteristics
of their populations.

�F‘
.

“‘
““
&lt;4,

FIRST CLASS

Permit No.

1876

CHICAGO 10, ILL.

VIA AIRMAIL

MAIL
REPLY
BUSINESS
No Postage Necessary if Mailed in the U.S.
Postage

.

W111

be paid by—
.

American Medical Association
535 North Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60610, U.S.A.
Z. Danilevicius, MD

_

—
'—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

_

~

�ARCHIVES OF
GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
EDITORIAL BOARD
ROY R. GRINKER SR., M.D., Chief Editor

American M€dical ASSOCiation
June

Institute for Psychosomatic

andPsychiatticReseatch

29th Street and Ellis Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60616
EATON W. BENNETT, M.D., San Antonio
EUGENE L. BLIss, M.D., Salt Lake City
GEORGE E. GARDNER, M.D., Boston
EDWARD O. HARPER, M.D., Cleveland
M. RALPH KAUFMAN, M.D., New York
HAROLD I. LIEF, M.D., New Orleans
FREDERICK C. REDLICH, M.D., New Haven, Conn.
MORTON F. REISER, M.D., New York
DAVID MCK. RIOCH, M.D., Washington, D.C.
JURGEN RUESCH, M.D., San Francisco

3 , 1965

Fink, M.D.
University Of Missouri

Max

Medicine
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri

JOHN H. TALBOTT, M.D., Director
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

SChOOl Of

GILBERT S. COOPER, Managing Editor
T. F. RICH, Assistant Managing Editor

63139

'

re: Manuscript

Number 3836

Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three
Voluntary Hospitals by KAHN, Fink,
and Siegel
Dear Doctor Fink:

I am very pleased to inform you that your paper has been
accopted by the Editorial Board for publication in the ARCHIVES
OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRE,

Yours very
ROY

truly,

R. GRINKER, 311., NJ).

Chief Editor
iknczbr

�’

ARCHIVES OF
GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
EDITORIAL BOARD
ROY R. GRINKER SR., M.D., Chief Editor

American Medical ASSOCiation

Institute to: Psychosomatic

andPsychiatticReseatch

29th Street and Ellis Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60616
EUGENE L. BLISS, M.D., Salt Lake City
GEORGE E. GARDNER, M.D., Boston
EDWARD O. HARPER, M.D., Cleveland
M. RALPH KAUFMAN, M.D., New York
HAROLD 1. LEE, M.D., New Orleans
FREDERICK C. REDLICH, M.D., New Haven, Conn.
MORTON F. REISER, M.D., New York
DAVID MCK. RIOCH, M.D., Washington, D.C.
JURGEN RUESCH, M.D., San Francisco

June 149 1965

Max

Fink,

M.D .

JOHN H. TALBOTT, M.D., Director
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

Department Of PSYChiatry

Executive Managing Editor
GILBERT S. COOPER, Managing Editor
T. F. RICH, Asszstant Managmg Edttor

ROBERT W. MAYO,

Missouri Institute Of Psychiatry
University Of Mi ssouri
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

re: Manuscript

SOciopsychological Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatment in Three
Voluntary Hospitals by KAHN, Fink,
and Siegel

Dear Doctor Fink:

I

Number 3326

very pleased to inform you that your paper has been
accepted by the Editorial Board for publication in the ARCHIVES
am

OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY.

Yours very
ROY

truly,

R. GRINKER,SR., M.D.

Chief Editor
RRG3br

P.S.

We

will,

Of

spaced throughout.

Course, need three cepies of the manscript, doubled

�re: Manuscript Number 3836

Sociopsychological Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in
Three Voluntary Hospitals by
KAHN,

Dear Author:

et

a1

Your paper has been received and is being considered by the
Editorial Board. A decision will be given to you as soon as possible.
Yours very truly,
ROY R. GRINKER, Sr.,

MD.

Chief Editor
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

�IS

ROYR. GRINKER, Sr., M

5

c)

Pan

‘

_HIS

29th STREET AND ELLIS AVENU CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, 60616

SIDE OF CARD

FOR ADDRESS

Fink, M.D.
University of Missouri
Dept. of Psychiatry at
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
5400 Arsenal Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

Max

�June 15, 1965

Dr. Roy R. Grinkcr, Sr. , Chief Editor-

Archivna of General Psychiatry
Institute for Paymomtic and Psychiatric Paaeamh
29th Strut and Ellis Avenue
Chicago. Illinois 60616
Dnar Dr. Grinkcr:

Enclosed am thme copies of thc

mmcxipt entitled

"Sociopsycl'nlogical Mpocts of Psychiatric '15:!th in
That. Voluntary Mitch," as mmtcd in ymr recent
letter. I am also enclosing the Mical abstract card.
I have pmvimuly
cm to Dr. Dmilevicim, as he had
rcqunstcd this about ten days ago.

mt

man: you very

much

for your interest.
Sincamly yours,
Pink, H.D.
Professor of Psychiatry

Max

Hrzkp

encloms

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�w.

.-..w‘ww.."“mmmmn—pw

MWCALWSOP

WCWWWWWW
mm

L

m.

31.9... ”I! My

Katmai.“ Sing-1.

Rub)“

“ODD...

�Wt
Oaks,

Thisutudyunduuwmmnutmmassocimdatthe
Hillside Hospital. Glen
of
L.I.

Expodmul Pawmutry,

New

Yak. 1959452.

MWmdﬂuataﬂsofﬂn
meimofIr.
CJ‘.
«ad
1:):
Manta).
Henningnr
Cantor
hath
Mutant“
mm
l-bmitnl in gratefully

W.

Aidcd, in part. by grams M24092 and HY~2715. of the National
Hulth, 0.8. Public malt}: Serving; and tho
Instituu of
mun Bond.
Rum County

mm

m1

O

Pun-mt Adams”

East 210th
York 1mm.

“

I’m-mt Adan":

W
SM.

mvidm of Psychiatry, Hmmfim
111
0mm, New
Howitd and

Wt
ram

New York.

of Psychiatry at the
Instituu o: Psyehhuy,
Missouri
School
of
of
Mmity

sum m1 Strut.
Win...
8t. Inuit, Missouri 63139.

no

HIP 2/1/65

Present Adda-u;

Nutimal Institutc of brutal Knuth,

Wadi. mma.

�.

V.—

,___‘V

... auvn-m. rm. .whwwvr... _w..

.vaw.‘w 3w.-- - .-.—u--r.. .'&gt;rlm' 'v' r q— “n... v-A‘Hnwwvwv‘V-vvv' )w-p—w' vrwumwrl—‘"W':"'V"V""-*‘VL'I'W-lw-v ‘.'._.,.._wv

mmmdﬂuﬂummmcmmpop-

ulntim.

8011111351356 and

hdlich

Imported significant

relation-

Mphmnmhmm'spmldminmsodalchssnmmtm
mmmddmceofmatndillmas,typesof¢iagmoddism

mmmmotmudammtmmmm.
mainflumceoftmmcstmofﬁumientmthe
availabilityofmating pummel.

m,mmtmm¢

Stmiasofﬁnmbofaodalfwminthomxmnof
of their fixmial status and tho
hospitalized paints

Wt
m

mast-tam at Huma- Hospital in
availability of mutant:
1957. In this hospital, anxiety of manhunt modes, incluling
individual payabaﬁnmpy,
were

WW

thompiu
available to all patients regardless of melt” ability to pay.
and convulsive

hmamys (mummizhat patimts hospitdiudforﬂn

Wm‘iodsmmoldar.hadlmedtmimmdmmoftm

011mm. Mom,mmwmimmpm
inmtlymmdbyomvulsiwﬁnmpymdmoeiwdmfavumbh

WWW.
mum
W
Myhypaydaathu‘pyujdmiwdpoomdim

mm

mm.mr.miv¢m.

mhoopitlliud for Impurioda, tmtad
ratings.

Thuclmimlfwmwnmmmamof‘sumtypy,
mmmnmrSa-hu.s).mwrm.w Mrstomn

mmmofmmmdinmlmtadimduinvolutiaalpmis
WWWMMWDMN thrupyﬂtocpitaliud‘fom amt-

m,mmmmmumwwm.

�_-..‘._ i

It as

,.

m." ....

7.." ‘r».:-

—

-~~--

um»

7.“ ,

suggested that differences in paydxiatr-io treatnmxt

afloat a similar influence of social factors

along hospitals should

as noted for patimts within Hillside Hospital. To

ewtion it was

decided to

wloy the

Hillside study in three institutions

cm. lhmin'ger
Mental Health

mm

enter in

-

test this

procedures of the 195?

Hilleide Hospital, the
Hospital in Topeka and the Maoeadmoetta
Boston.

Those

with the expectation that diverse

available to population of

institutions

were selected

tnataent modalities

diffemt social classes.

were equally
Each provided

ohm—ten treatment of voluntary patients and did not provide
custodial care. Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory

staff

and active

march mite,

mixing

peydnomalytioallycoriented psychotherapy.
'Ihia study wm designed to detemine thepopulatim character-

ietioe of the three inetitutim with respect to social class. age,
echoatim and 1' some; lid to relate these dmmcteriatios to
treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diamoeia and discharge evaluation

mg

the inetitutiom.

tvwrw— w

v

�w

J"-

-A.».—.

v

...v. m-uwwa. ... ,ur» In.‘,._(...._,..n .,.‘,.“___,‘

.-

warm—Mr...“

.

.VN....

.v-

, ‘ ,7...” .... ....

NM”, x..." ‘rwm'.tq'(1.'rm'“&gt;1ﬂr-r.ny\w ”rm—"w.“ﬁvn v..._

mu
Ammofmwlmtuy.am1tpaﬁmtsinmimin

mum
adminidnﬂonpitalslndvolmtuypaﬁmsmly,amnnmr

WWquuminmeylaso.

ofthoocatﬂuWMthﬁmethﬂﬂQmm

mimdbyﬁnmtsprsymcovalmﬁmormm
dadmionwimmicnmmitummfmdfwn
specifiampmjwt. Mmﬂmﬂmmmfmﬂu
studybocmofthcirmwmuy

3m.

mmimeIMwasmndformImtimtmm
mundu.‘

memmofdismdmimﬁ

mummmmmmmwmmcrma
1110M.

PornmofsoddclumﬂnﬂoWZ-fwtw

im-aWMsdemmmmim-mmd
of
Hillside,
at
patients
(3.“,7).
mist-d
M
MORWWDSKWWWWMmCmtw.
mmmmmﬂmofﬁnnmofﬂusml
The

W

173

mmmdmcmiabluwiﬂdnmmnimﬂmumnm
batman institutions. mu. maxim mm difficult. lunar,

MmeofvuMBquiffWWbem.

W
www.mmwymoepaymcvamm
diffimltiu were

most mined

These

in the intm-hospital

will be placid on the diffomw batman imtitutiau with citatim
difficulties also no to
o: mwmmmm

m
m.
mummfomdmfwm‘dau,mfhmdintbeubmbythé
'

vmpawmimsaploaigs.

‘

pvt—u u

�A.

WMCAL mums

M Rpm

ofthehoapitalis

r

studies from an. instituticn, tho

stmctm

fwmtedmdeimrimdorm~

tel-am

timed bﬂaﬂy. In suturing amenable data from nultiplc
institutimo, hmwr, the durum between institutions are
«mutated. R111- thele institutims were sol-cred as mental:

invading,

mom

and

Mt m.

unlﬂm in ways which inflummd the data

they

a! the

m

8m.

fmctimdly
Specific

Mt,
mutant «Item.

differences were manhunt in the deeimtim of type of

(lunatic mutants.

and

th- evaluation of

m
Raw
designating that a pationt miwd
of

1.

the

institutim,

making

01'

Mutant:

The

”1:”de

cum-rim difficult.

oxitcria for
diffemd mg

hazing-r Hospital psychoﬂmpy was duimatod as mutant
basis by a staff psychiatrist for
Want-d on a
At

Mum

mmpaﬁmtwudmmdafui Wwithapsyddmic
ruidunt physicim wen midst“ part a! rmtino mutmiw
paint an.

arm a

Hillsid- ibopitn payMampy was
mutant
main»! with a psychiatric mid-at. Staff poydmictrim did not
A1:

matplthnta,

mmmactivitiutowpoming

midmtphysicim.

Nomitimdfmwemmd.

W
mm
MW 3
At

tht

th- mtivity

Hum: Gutter pnyehothcrupy was

ofmy disciplines

--~-

We

�“am

&lt;

-v

u w“ -w “KN..." .... ,.. v... -.

.7

r,r.,,..-....r...m~

rm.“

\w‘wur-m

7.. ,

.mvmwvrwmw—w ”v, w... H r.

v.

-_.'wm.-_..r.,.“,...m_,,‘,,.._w_..,. ,,._r_~‘l.,,_.
w

mm,pydnlosisu.sochlm,nms
wwwwdzmsimmnmtmﬂmlyimmainm

mdmdioal students.

mt'smmmmmmummmm

Witmmmfwmofﬂuammminm
unmidmtplmidmmpmnibh farewells...

W:
Wm:
2.

and.

Indivichal imtitutimal

difficult.

At

diamtic styles

cums
WWtal

Whmlﬂphuvmmiwsmmdbytmmdw
and
music:we row
mum
diffmtuﬁmaym. Scwnlmwofdimm

W.
W

Wmmudinhbul,wmhmmsumutodmmm

thWmMﬂﬁWmhﬂmﬁm.

Mmmmamﬂmm.
3-

m
WW=WMW

mummmitmmwinrmmmm. m
WWatWpritnmtdpar-dtewitham
«31min: Max:111,

W011

and

syndm

W.

mmmimmmmmmmmmmam
difficult to assess the ammunim of cad:
it

tutor
ofﬁnlhminearsymﬂ'nblan). Pwﬁﬁss‘mdyﬂnmmw
rating

making

smmmmmmmmotwm
intimation.

m
A...

7w..

�,

.,__n..-. 7‘..-‘._._.‘._..-..W‘..v...‘ w...—,.,-v.,mx-,~_..V“-.."w.u

"Wm.”w r9.w‘_v

. .r,_..-——w.w

”w. ._»,.,.r,,

—

._.__ .m‘...-..v..‘~,.\"

»......—-....—-v—

"m..- w

w ——.~..

".V...», v...“ -

mmmmumoruummamum,m.m

mmmrmmmmmmuumm
in
III.

W

Table

I)

W
mattinmﬁaipuaddﬂfnmin
mm"

mommmmormmmmmw.

”Wm-pimﬁupwﬂaﬂmmpmuywm;

«mumm.mm;mnmmmmm

www.muymam.
b)

msnmmmdifminmdimibutim

ammumwmmm.

Wammmaﬂu‘dhm
_mmm.mmmummmamdm
«WWmmummmmnmmmm.
mulmmammummmmmw
3M.uuya2parmtdtmmidcmd23permtatﬂlmimr
c)

didmtm.

d)

Wswfminmdlstﬁbutimat

mmﬁnmifthSed-mmmd.

Fifty-em

mmtdmmmrmhlwm.mmy

oimtmmwimmofSOwabw-wmhlmfm
hum

InWt.

�,

”.7

.

v

Nv‘,—'

~

v

,

v... v.

‘v"

—.~,~.~..-m ”11"!“ “we

,-.. ~.&lt;..,

.._ ~--r“~..,—a,&lt;.»~mprv-.

—.

~~pw~mmmw-w~mn

m.” a...

j."

-r..-‘...,.1~.v»

nymI-rznu

at Hillside thirty-me per cent of the patients had 1" scores
30 while at WHO only twenty per mt mm belcw 30.
mus, differences in social

perfume: an the

below

clan, edumtional attaimxt

P Scale were observed.

and

These diffexemee permit

test of the hypotheses relating sociopsydsological factors to the
mam-at variables mg these institution.
2. gleam-1c Than-ant Variables
a

n) Selectim of

rm

uimifimtly

W:

Manna

the institutions,

patimts at Naming” Hmpitel 043*.) received
sciatic therapy than at Hillside (6%) or 11116 (68$) (Table IV).
1:)
V

Wm

at Hoegiteliznticn:

‘lhe

three insti—

tutims differed with mm: to patient's length of my (m1. IV).
Pedant: it Hlminw Mini was hospitalized lamest, with
65‘ cf patients mining far twelve month: or
mated to

m.

alparwrtofﬂnﬂillnidepatientsMmlySpercmtatthe

Pin-mm

Hentnl thalth Center. 'Ihe mdal stay of the Hillside

mmbetweeneemmdelmmﬁu while tm-thirds ofthe

WC patients were
a)

W
Evalutim:

diam
Diem

within six

In and!

petients were evaluated at the time of
(Table IV) . At
(191!)

thinger Hoapitel.

of patients wen rated

patimt

was

a

of hoapitelizatim.

mini, mot

dimmer-3e no

"iuprmd"

however, a higher percentage

“miwmved” and only a single

scared ”uncured" or “max iwmved." The

percentage of ”mounted" an "mm harmed" rating

him

(2810 and

the

�_

_

v.

“v

~_.v_..‘._.......p.r

"anv “:wu—"mw-nr

-17.": WNWV. ”.wuwwn mm My .-.._‘ n-wwn-y—wy ..~—r

7—

—-,__.y vwri'ai.W"YV-wwmrnw.

Mmportimofwumwd”(mt)wmfamdnmmuo

mwmmm.
W3
minimum:

W,

d)

nostic

For

satiation analysis
uffccdw

Mmmiamdpomuuntymnﬂabh

than:

diag—

diam,

IV). Trading-

Mamdmmmmmmm
mmmm.usum1ymmmenaiW
"Wmmrwmmhwdfwdw
centrist. at
paydmmia
WW1“).

disorder. In

and

memmdfwmﬂmﬁftypwmdm
W161.
c.

’

m

W.»
mmammmmmmmmmmf
”Alum

W.ﬁnﬂrhmpmiﬂwiﬂdnudaimﬁtuﬂm.mdm

mm m].- siu

(neural

mine

Maud:

had
was
(«or than than was) maimed significant intru-l’mpital mn-

pm.

Humor-.mmappomummtommmm

thou-lineman

MMmeMnWmm

ulwddefatWHo-piulwwwhiMF
accumumfmmuymaimwmm‘py).md
Pamalematlﬂlhide.

mamimmmm~

Wmmmnmnmmmmmmm
Wm~mwmmmfmetm.
mmmmmummtmmmmmm,

�asmmmndwamudummmbuwmmmmn

mummusotpmmmummmonomm
Mam.

W

m
DISCUSSIW

mmormmmymmnmcmm

mind significant inter-institutional cum in social
mwmofmum.mtmtm;indiatﬂbutimof

ammrsmammmmmormmmm

win~mmothosp1unudm.ahctimo£mmts

mammarmmamwmum
maul-mm“.
Hmpitnlatudy
WWmmmmr
(7).

marina-d. 'nuimtitutimmvingwmpatiom

mmmmmwmyummw
paydmdodimmdmmdiwﬂcm,a

�-rw .-,.

a...

h

-...

w

‘

purvm .. “.V

7—-..

w. tux—0.... V" - ,7". "7‘-.. -

"\‘w' . -. -h. -Vw—l m.—....‘——wn~.
V

.

m

.w._-—zu—«——~....'_~Wm,-

u...“

-10..

form
of
therapy.
mtic
mim
and the poorest discharge ratings mg the three institutims.
smmxy. the 1:31:in serving mg. class patients did have

Mr

proportion of patients

the shorter

pew

of

hoe:pi.t:eliaa1:i.tm,~

peydmmtic diamond, ad

lover proportions bf

the better discharge evaluations.

Itumiwmeimﬂmtmdﬂfeminpeydumc

W

durum

in staff ettitudes and
are related more to
lock]. alas variables than peydniatric differences in populetiom.

The

are

We
greet.

as

between

m the

mututime in dwetim 0f hapitaliutim
mucky of climatic foundations.

diam-rye evaluations. deﬂnitima of peydwthempy, and the

detail- md aunt of
differences

W

date. mm. these stylistic

idiosynmtic, they follow! a
social
related
to
diffemoes, aid ﬁnir'miemncy
mum
with emeoteticm laments e meter dependence on social class
may be

dismissed as

Wiedgad.
Sud! mulatim and metnnt variable

variables than outwardly

intemtive processes,
physicim and the

of

an

15th

determined both by

mum‘s

staff

relatimships are
the attitude of the

me! by

the

matellatim

or history which patients present. Such relationships
mined mat in than psychiatric conditions where diwtic

criteria are leeet specific,

a,an

fining diseases of Imam etiology

where objective

criteria de-

absent. as in schizophmie.

peyoimmuis, personality md beluvior

W.

Under these

�-

——-»~.—..

.

0 .

.... Twp...

-‘--

~vv-ul'~w

5" 1m -.——.rw~‘~_.r

“mp—m...“

"m”.

.

v~-_.v...‘.. ...

m

«um”www.m—mrwv.r.w-‘.,r-r.—,.m.~ Nut-aw..." I"-~nr~rl’-'

Irav’r VW'FV‘wW-Pf'lm‘"- ._

mmwpomwthainiguity.m¢oh«mr's

mmwmmmuwmumormm
classified“, «Md-claims.
osmium.

1:313:11»qu

chalydoamudbyl’umidc,mnitxmdhfm (6)1ntha1r
studyafmiatimiadimiuwithinasinghimtitutim.

'nuyobuzwdﬂutputiummimdatrmmdiffcmtm

admtdifhrintypoofmm,mitalm,e¢mim.
mermaid-non. Simiﬂcmtdiffcmasdidm,m,in

“demmicwvimﬁmmm
Mm

“wwwmmmmwm.
wtmmmmmmmmm.mumwm
wmmammotdimmmmmitmIofﬂn

W.
WWWofmmismdmniml

mmnnhmwmmfcmdmmimb
tutimmmﬂm. unmmmammaemm
mimic-insults. Farminlhmimmtdwiﬂxm

Wyudmdpcmlmmﬁngmmnknpcimpmmto

fwﬁnlamttiu,huﬂufmtpatiem$mdu

W.mm.mﬂupmatmtmulu.

Arm,inmt.miahismstimlmiwinduﬁninga

Wat.kmpaﬂmufwﬁndmtpoﬂw.Mhma

mmamWWme
Whhaatmammults.

�mmmotmmmmmmqmny
olmwﬂnmmtofmwutyofpopumamfw
dogmofilhmsmgmeimtimﬁms, these {Wand

We

«ﬂeet the mhtiva
efficacy of the institutions.
Simﬁncvalmﬁmsmbaudmtmmﬁmdm’sommﬁngs,

arm
Mfmmmofimmmmrﬁminmicpsyw-

we

mum that tho

rennet variaticm in the criteria

Mam“.
Inwinimlfiﬂhidoatudym)itmpoamhmthat

M
WWW.
mam criteria of

were

utilized {or

mom

of

Itwmsuggastedﬁmttmmmr

ﬂumm'asodubwmdﬁnmmlexﬂtheﬁaw
ployad.

with

mmmumlymmmmmtsm.

ﬂu cuff of ﬂaming-r ibupital min; a tripartite rating
Em

Wmmemmgdmmmmum.

mmmemmﬁngmmmmmmtiwamim
ﬁmnlmmbmd.itisourmumtmtorlmr

duapommwapttcumiwinnuumto

Wamfwﬁnpaﬁmt's mpmitytomm wrigmile

for uppor ulna panama the criteria aphasia: such mien intangiblmm”avnloping insight,"or"mﬂd.nng‘a pmbm."

mmmmmmmmmmmmu
ofwdnfminpaymem.mhmbemgruﬂy
mmwmmmmmormm_mumm.

�Midesmmwamedmﬂmllnad-nhip
mamamimmmmmwmmnucmuy
defined. But diffm in instituﬂmal style and: it diffimlt
toebtlincmpambhdata.

Mmdmisnmmmpmblm

Wiml
Wu
meofwdxinmcmm. memormm
of the

use of

statistics,

«Many in

W,mewmwlmnthm
umitwiainmmwalmmwmidmﬁﬂmimof

Whpopuladmmauhdecttomiwmmnum
institutions

m charly mm for staff attitudu md atyla

wmlluminmminpaﬁmrtwpumm.

Thu-o

difﬁmltiwalaouﬂndtoﬂnfdlmdscimﬂahmomﬂm

mmwmymmmmmMuMm-m.

mmmammmwmmmu.
mmmdﬁmmmuMqummm

hypotm. ﬂamofthcm”adﬁaophmnia"or”paydw-

W18” to explore chm in paydnologial and biological

futuresofmtdﬂlmnhulodmascimww

Manama oboewatimtobanpoma
Mmmwzoday,mmmthmmmtom

negatiw

malts.

paydkalc munitions

Manly fwamfm tut of the

be
must
paid, to the elusiﬁcutim
Imam
Music.
mum

m,
wmymmmmmmmmnﬂmm
of aubjwts by "abjectiw" criteria tamer than our present

the oodnpoydxologiml aspects of ﬁn unmist-padom:

Wm.

�v. ....,

A.

n.

‘v ....._.—ur————‘.v—.

muw ‘ «m Two—u..— -..—.—v. .r. vvn&lt;~&gt;ww~wmﬂ‘rmew~——uir—I .—~ .

am

WMWW

Was,
Mmmdrsm,mm1mammamntvaﬂablaoin

dufimd by social class, age,

Fopuluﬂm

on. ”may tanning hospitals.
typo of

mm.

W

variablas incluad

dmutim of hmpitulimtim, diagnosis md
diuduma evaluation. Imimtitmimal diffaranous mm
in mint nodal class, yum of
and distri-

m

mam

Monofculifmiufums,butmtsga.

Wins

Thu

tions

m

in

W

Gamma“ mg institu-

uimifioumly diffamt in the pmdictad dimctim.
The imtitutim sawing
class patients did have the longest
Minn of stay, a higher pmportim of paydxmam'otic diagnoses
and

W

m min:

diagnostic

am,

W,

a lower proportion of

diam

and the poorest
too-Mag mastic fans of
ratings can; tho
imtttutim. Similu‘ly, the

m

patina

imitutim

ummmmmdidmmmrpemcr

houpitulisutim, 1m proportion of psydxmamdc diagnoses,
and the
discharg- evaluations.

Wvariation
on
ma
mm
m
muss

with

W
mm

not

and

Such

dim, Wm
hum

institutimo

objwmdam is

in psychiatric practices followed u pattern
class &lt;11!qu mg thu momma.

as idiosyncratic.

in institutions! style make madam of
of houpitalizatim and treatment mats

{:1th

ma tea-nuts,

and the mad

for

m

«item m:- the classification: of psymiati'ic populu~

mind.

�REFERENCES

and
D.
J.
T.
Levinson,
Frenkel-Brunswik,
W.,
E.,
Adorno,
and
The
N.
R.
Harper
Authoritarian
Personality.
Sanford,
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,
Mental

Inc.,

A. B. and

Illness:

Redlich, F.

C.

Community Study.
New York, 1958, 442 pp.
A

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

M.
M.
and
Social Factors in
Fink,
Pollack,
L.,
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.

Kahn, R.

J. Hillside Hosp.,

1957, 6: 216—228.

M.
M.
and
Sociopsychologic
Fink,
Pollack,
L.,
Mental
in
Treatments
a
Voluntary
of
Psychiatric
Aspects
and
Ratings
of
Discharge
Duration
Hospitalization,
Hospital:
Diagnosis. Argh, Gen Psyghia§., 1959, A; 565-574.

Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink, M.

Social Attitude

(Ca1—

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J4_Nexy&amp;_mgntg_ﬂls,,

1960, 1395 187—192.

.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
116:
127-132.
1959,
Ameza_J‘_£a¥£hiat.,
Hospital.

7. Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesiggation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved

______.____——————-———

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission

Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Unimproved

�TABLE

Interhosgital

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

Hospital

N

Class

WM”

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

IllllﬂiilllllllIIIIEEEEHIIIIIIIIIIIIﬂﬂZﬂIIIIIIII

I

Social

III

31%

7%

3%

II

51

20

28

III

17

34

13

H

IV

1

34

28

V

0

5

28

”'1‘"
"

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p&lt;{.001

,,_-_1_A_s-__1.______
19%

20— 39

=3. 9;

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

--—--—-—
x2 =

F

Score

df= 4; p=n. s.

=

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05
§3z

20%

50

38

17

42

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Variables
Treatment
in
Differences
InterhOSpital
EMBnninger

Hospital

Treatment

Psychotherapy

21%

36%

24%

Somatic

43

64

68

Other

36

-—

8

x2

Duration
.

0?
HOSpltal—

lzat1°n

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

IlﬁﬂﬂﬂﬂllllIIIlﬂEﬂIIIIIIIIZIIIIIII

N

Type of

Hillside

=

82.8- df=4

-m**
7

months

7-11 months

'

.11 months

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

Discharge Improved
Evaluation

nimproved

X

=

29.3' df=4' -&lt;.001

85

54%

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis

17

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

29
X

=

23.8' df=4‘ -&lt;.001

�Duration of HOSpitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20-29

73

36

30—39

61

3O

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

l4

�AMA SPECIALTY JOURNALS

'

'
lC

'

Am 6 r1 C a n M e d al A S S O C l at] O n
535 NORTH DEARBORN STREET

-

'

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60610

wa—

AREA CODE 312

527-1500

910-221-0300

November

2 , 19 65

Archives of Dermatology
.
um 0
an i:Chialldr:n
Sinse;ses
Archives Of
Envir nrnent al Heal I h
.°
Archives °f
General Psychiatry

Archives of
internal Medicine
Archives of Neurology
Archives of Ophthalmology
Arc ives o ‘0‘ o l a ‘V n g o ‘ o 3’
"_
Arcthes of Pathology
A'c h'was ° f S“ '3 eW

JOHN H. TALEOTT, MD, DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

ROBERT W. MAYO, EXECUTIVE MANAGING EDITOR
NORMAN

D. RICHEY,

MANAGING EDITOR

Fink , MD
Department of Psychiatry
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry
University of Missouri
5400 Arsenal St.
St. Louis, Mo. 63139

Max

Dear Doctor Fink:

edited copy of your manuscript entitled, ”SociopsychoA
Treatment:
of
Aspects
Report of
Psychiatric
logical
Treatments in Three voluntary Hospitals,” is enclosed for
your final checking and approval. Also enclosed is a layout that shows placement of title, copy, and illustrations.
Please indicate any necessary changes in a covering letter
rather than on the edited typescript. we will be responsible for checking your material against proofs.

An

manuscript has been edited according to present AMA
style. For example, most abbreviations appear without
periods.

The

are currently striving for brevity in article titles. If
the modified title of your paper is not satisfactory, please \/
supply another that will fit into two lines of no more than
40 characters and Spaces each.

we

L
,ZU

Chi,
for reprint purposes, the one

Is address at end of article,
you will be using on a relatively long-termlaasis?

1

Specialty Journals publish acknowledgments only to personsbﬁ1p
P
have
aided
in
that
a
a
study
or organizations
major way, as,
for example, by supplying drugs or funds, making statistical
analyses, or doing pathological studies.

AMA

references have been renumbered to conform to our rule
requiring numerically consecutive citation.

Your

�Fink,
St. Louis,

Max

MD

-2-

Mo.

11/2/65

According to our calculations,the paper will occupy 6 printed
pages. Please note that any new material you may wish to
submit at this time will be acceptable only if it can be
compensated for by deletion of an equal amount of copy now

included.

have retyped the references so that an accurate copy estimate could be made. Although we have reread the typescript, we request that you also check for any errors of
omissions that may have slipped through.

we

correction and return of your typescript will help us
get it into print as fast as possible. Please return it,
along with the layout, in the enclosed self-addressed envelope no later than November 9. For your convenience we
are also enclosing a reprint order form with the correct
number of pages indicated.
Prompt

Yours very

amh

,

udith

M.

truly,

Kiolbassa

�.

"luau—“new .-

,

.

H-

MW.

-1

~

»~v

-

we. w

re

,-_....‘--—-~~w—~- «V...

WP

v,“

mm“- "WWW.

w.

1“.

-

-..

.. .

5. 1965

Judith H. Kiolbesse
Mariam Medical Association
535 North Deerbom Street
Chicago,

Illinois

60610

Dear ﬂies Kiolbesse:

Myouwrymdafcrymmletterofﬂovemrz. I
shelltrytomreechitenineeqmnoe.
The article title is satisfactory, elthcugh I think the
"A

Mt

sub-heed should reed
in Three Voluntary
Report of
Hospitals.“ 'me word "treetlsents" end "treetsent" are probably

interminable, but in this inetmoe, I think the singular

{on is preferable.

However, both eve acceptable.

While the address at the end of the erticle is one that
will be used for e lmg~tem basis, I would prefer that you
and that is the Depertnmt of
change this for Dr.
Psychiatry. University of axioego. Chicago, Illinois.

m.

edmouledgmt included the name of Dr. Max Pollack.
In ell the studies done at Hillside, Dr. Pollack was e coper'tioipmt. In this study he was one of the three people
she visited eech of the institutions. Hmever, in writing
this report, there were some disagreements as to the omclusims,
mdheelectednottobeeoo—euthoroftheetudy. Hy
essccietes and I. wild, however, like to indicate his
assistance, and for this meson, I think a statusent, "me
cooperation of Dr. Mex Polleok is gratefully edmwledged"
“me

would be

appropriate.

met.

numbered refermces are
I m assuming
thet the Jamel limits the timer of authors to three, and
The

metthieisthereesmmythatintwooftheoitetions
the co~euthore are omitted. If this is not e gmerel rule,

perhaps in this instance the oo—wthcrs could be

listed.

page la, in addition to the notation regarding the coopemtim
of Dr. Pollack, would you please damage the address of Dr. Kern
from Hontifiore Hospitel to: Department of Psychiatry, University
of Omicego, Chicago, Illinois.
On

.uw

vs.— ‘ =. 2.. .: “may.“

.

.,..

�Miss Kiolbassa

-2-

Also, the dates 1959-1952 , which follow the statement donoeming
the origin of the study, are immutable by themelvee. In our
original report, we used the sentence, "his study was dorm when
the authors were associated at the Department of Experimental
Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital. 19594962." If 30m full sentence

ofﬂuiekindionottobeinoluded,thmlwmldouggestthat
the dates 1959-1982 be omitted.

I

have read the

text carefully,

and

find two small corrections

midxlhavemked. mm2,naarﬁmbotton, theoomotimo
putaolashlinethmwﬁthemwerS, mdthiemaybemolmto
1’
the printer.

It

should read "the California

Scale. 03,5)

page 10, mfemoe 7 should be number 6, and
mmked this copy.
cm

I

have so

is a table. and them is a symbol which I do not
mderatmd. In the first oolm."omplete remission"is aplit
with a synbol mien to me would indicate that the word “mission”
should be under "ooeplete." If that is so, this may be molear.
I do not know how this will be not, but ”oanplete minim,"
"amicedly homo," "mdemtely normed” are each word pairs
that should not be split. If this is too long for the oolmn,
than I hope you will indicate féthat "markedly mmved” fit
Page 19

together by appropriate spacing.

Tﬁis is the first time that I have had the opportunity to
edit a mmxmoz-ipt in this fashion, and I must say that I found

it quite helpful.
opportunity toworkwithyou, andI
Myouforthe
look forward to the final results.
Sincerely yours .

Pink, NJ).
Professor of Psychiatry

Max
HP :

in

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�~

This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen
Oaks, L.I. New York, 19591-1962.

cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial
"
is
acknowledged.
Hospital
gratefully
The

.

‘

Aided, in part, by grants My-2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street, New York, New
York

**

Present Address:

10467.

‘

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine,-University of

Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139
***

MIP

2/1/65

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland

�In their studies of the New Haven psychiatric patient pop—
ulation, Hollingshead and Redlich hast reported significant relation—
ships between an individual's position in the social class structure
.and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2), The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excluded.

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to paye In anr
thsae surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings, In contrast, younger, native born/aim?
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingsa
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i.eo, greater stereotypy, were often found in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosisf
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredo
in-ehe-survey—rEpUTtEd-hETE)[it was suggested that dif—
"’4”“’A“'
ferencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for iht patients within Hillside
Hospitala To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the pro—
cedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions -¢ Hillside
HosPital, the C. Fo Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston, These institutions were
selected with the Fr:ec£3£ipn that hing-had diverse treatment modalities h’&amp;Y‘
available,;d££:eoi¥ed-paeients
of different social classeso
equally
Each provided short—term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial care, Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapyo
This study was designed to determine the population characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions,

�_2_
METHOD

A

census of

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

the institutions was undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside HOSpitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizo-

phrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
status? The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2-factor index a weighted score of education and occupation
was used (3,4,7)o The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centero
—

study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between
institutionso These comparisons were difficult/however, because of
various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intraehospital comparisons/.and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the
differences between institutions with citation of intra-institutional
trendso These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which—ie-reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
The

sizes,

�RESULTS

A.

Methodological Problems

repgfting studies from one institution, the structure
of the hospital guanine taken for granted and either ignored or mentioned briefly. In gathering comparable data from multiple institu~
tions, however, the.mnny;differences between institutions are accen—
tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific differences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcomeo
When

l. Designation of Type of Treatment: The criteria for
designating that a patient received "psychotherapy" differed among
the institutions, making comparisons difficult,
At Menninger

Hospital psychotherapy

was designated as
basis by a staff psychia-

treatment administered on a prescription
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the ‘2
psychiatric residentﬁyere considered part of routine administrative
patient care.
fkysa4.¢

Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident, Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicianso No additional fees were chargedo
At

At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
was designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students,
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychowas necessary for members of the study team to interview
therapy

it

the residentgresponsible for each case.
fkjsKJAu

Individual institutional diagnostic styles
made comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systems, Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortiono
2°

Diagnosis:

�Table I

Discharge Ratings of Improvement: Ratings of improvement at the three hosPitals varied in format and detaily The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a sep—
arate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global
ratings making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II)o For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other
30

institutionsa

Table

Q

M’s

_———"’

Inter-hos ital
&lt;:; B.ﬁ~~,»n--__
"M..-

{§_‘

10

The

Com

II

arisonSN

Sociopsychological Variables

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
California F Scale score among the three institutions

education and
is presented in Table

III.

Table

a) Social Class:

The

III

.

anticipated difference in social

class composition of the three institutions was observed, At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
/AE Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age

in the institutional populationso

distribution

�populations also differed in edu—”
cational attainment, with patients having more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduateo
0) Education:

The

Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fiftynone per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per—
cent with scores of 50 or above -- the higher F scores being associated with higher degrees of stereotypy, In contrast, at Hillside
thirty-one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at
MMHC only twenty
per cent were below 30.
d)

F

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed, These diff—
erences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables

\“"2.

among

these institutions.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables

a) Selection of Treatment: Among the institutions,
significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received

somatic therapy than at Hillside
b) Duration of

(64%)

or

MMHC

Hospitalization:

(68%)

(Table IV),

three insti—
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)o
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of
hospitalization.
The

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
patients were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved" and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"o The highest
percentage of "recovered" or ”much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health Centerm

nostic

d) Diagnosis: For statistical analysis
groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective

three diagdisorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one—quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty perncent of the
populationo
zx

Table IV

‘“

CLJLRS

."”

C: Intra—Hos

s-‘wa.

~~

r“

e~

ital

Com

arisons

‘h53

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital com—
parisons, However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier study, Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillside. Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals - the younger patients remaining for the longest periodst
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year,
The

Table

V

�DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var—
iables -- duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7)“
swudy
Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospitauﬁﬁ;;:’
confirmed. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data. While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow
a pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged,

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, Egg}, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disordersq Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications

among

the

three wards and among three administrators on one ward“ As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical

evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one institution to another, Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi-

atric characteristics.

initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social backgroundc It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—
ployedo This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
In our

"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
be clearly defined, But differences in institutional style made
it difficult to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapieso The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hos—
pitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationso
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the orig—
inal hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
results. Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the socio—
psychological aspects of the therapist-patient interaction.

�-10-

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
age, education and F score, were related to treatment variables
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in—
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation, Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distri—
bution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
institutions were significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionse
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.
The

variations in psychiatric practices followed a
pattern consistent with the social class differences among the in—
stitutions and are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric populations is emphasizedo
These

�REFERENCES

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel—Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality.
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

Illness:

New

Redlich, F.
Community Study.

A. B. and
A

C.

J.

and
Harper and

Social Class and

John Wiley and Sons,

York, 1958, 442 pp.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216-228.

Kahn, R.

.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization,
Diagnosis. Arch, Gen Psychia;., 1959,
Kahn, R.

Kahn, R.

ifornia

F

L., Pollack,

M.

and Fink,

M.

Sociopsychologic
Voluntary Mental
Discharge Ratings and
1; 565—574.

Social Attitude (Cal-

Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. 14_lkuahhlkuxLL_Disu,

1960, llQ: 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orien—
tation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. AmeIa_J4_E£¥£hiaL., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, 1Q; 191-196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality
Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Alcoholism, Chronic

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Alcoholism

Infantile.Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical

Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved
Unimproved

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comparisons for Sociopsxchological Variables
Menninger

Hospital
I

Class

31%

7777 7 7

7%

II

51

20

III

17

34

IV

1

V

O

34

.

5

l|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x2

77

Hospital

Massachusetts
Mental Health

IIIIIﬂBiﬂIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIII

N

Social

Hillside

7 7N7 777—777
7

=

121.5; df=8: p’{.001

7m__-—

-77777777—77

20 39

Years of

Educatio

&lt;12

41%

12-15

49

16+

10

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
iMenninger

Hospital

Treatment

Psychotherapy

36%

21%

Somatic

Other

um—
=82 8'

N

Duration
0?

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Healt
Center

IIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIKIIIDIIIHIIIIIIJJIIIIII

N

Type of

Hillside

7

months

7—11

months

Hospitallzat1°n .11 months

df= 4

.

.001

Z

'

A

70

13

42

27

65

31

5

52%

54%

22

17

26

29

Discharge
Improved
Evaluation
Unimproved

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder
X

=

23.8' df=4' -&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age

Menninger

Hillside

Below 20

81

42

20—29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

40—49

3O

20

50+

36

MMHC

l4

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

‘Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�:0".

mm»... can“ b. awn-u a mi: “tum-Ma
in
a
M an“ ”MI "in“ am:
tm‘nt It“ ”mm
van-mm
pap-nun
”humbly!
m trams
m
um
to
but!
up»: u “mun" pram-I. «Wu!
h
by
no
“at:
m
pints“:
m
“um. a
n
manna"
u. wanna» .1 Wm at hum: mu 1 ”tint
up mm“. In! mumm- Irin h nut mm in

m

than

Mm

m.

pmmuu

I!"
”not“
Mt
“am“:
Mm

hut with, $1334, than “I “scan" uﬁnu «ﬂung
«In». or knu- uum Mum-mt an that. a n

W“
mchm“ ”than”2le
at

numb”,

nnﬂnn.
“than” an

and

«mutton o:

a“
nun»’M“”
a:

citation!

«yuan-n tum
v3.01:
2»
a» mu
pmmuu «a «mausuun. In.
an
ﬂatly Imam“ hr tun-much, an“: and um (7) u

that it“: of «than: as “was: um: a am. in“.
huh. 3.; than“ it“. ”mm mum}! animal! to
551’:an
an m mm in m. t: await», mm:
sum, man, an 0:
awn-mt «um-«m

m

mm.

m
m
mthmulnhhiutmummd. u “unawaI“ am, bum,
11:01:

«In “no

in

“and“

it.

and. as!

“St-rm mu tub-rut 1: m ywmﬂn.

�SociopsydholOgical Aspects of

Psydhiatrie Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

;R0berrt L,

.lﬁahn,

1311313332!

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

‘—
NEIIIIiiiiIIiE§E¥§

�-7-

’4‘,

DISCUSSION

patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter—institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment variables -— duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations {7},
The

Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmeda The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionsc
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower proportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations.

It is

our impression that these differences in psychiatric treatment are related more to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populationso The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded datae While these styl—
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow

pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged.
a

population and treatment variable relationships
are interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presento Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, i;gf, where objective criteria de—
fining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disorderso Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution.
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residence. Significant differences did occur, however, in
Such

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2914">
                <text>Sociopsychological aspects of psychiatric treatment in three voluntary hospitals. A.M.A. Arch Gen Psychiat. 14:20-5.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2915">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2916">
                <text>mfp-02-01-004-59b-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2917">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2918">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Siegel, Nathaniel</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2919">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2920">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2921">
                <text>Reprint, [preprint], drafts, letters, review board postcard, </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2922">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2923">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74494">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81055">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87616">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94177">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="242" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="33">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/4092f702c20d2db606a33fb51b3082e2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>eb5e272391290df4e9e5af41a15c37b2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100659">
                    <text>THE “AMYTAL TEST” IN PATIENTS
WITH MENTAL ILLNESSl
ROBERT L. KAHN, Ph.D.,2 MAX FINK, M.D.,3
EDWIN A. WEINSTEIN, M.D.4

and

Recent studies have demonstrated the value of utilizing amytal
sodium as a diagnostic test for the presence of brain damage (9, 10,
ll) . Under the inﬂuence of this drug, certain changes in orientation
and awareness of illness occurred in patients with brain disease that
rarely appeared in persons without demonstrable brain pathology.
These changes included patterns of disorientation for place, time,
and person, and verbal denial of illness and incapacity.
In addition to disorientation and denial of illness, other changes
in verbal pattern and the nonverbal aspects of behavior occur in
both patients with brain disease and in normals.l5 All of these aspects
of behavior have contributed to an understanding of the relationship of the psychological and physiological effects of the drug and
the role of language in adaptation to stress.
Until now the normals have consisted of patients with peripheral
nerve, spinal root and cord lesions and miscellaneous medical and
surgical conditions. There has been no systematic investigation of
patients with mental illness unassociated with demonstrable brain
changes.
1From the Neurological Services of Hillside Hospital and The Mount Sinai
Hospital, New York.
This investigation was supported in part by the Medical Research and Development Board, Ofﬁce of the Surgeon-General, Department of the Army under
Contract No. DA-49-007-MD-376 and by a grant-in-aid from the Lilly Research
Laboratories.
Dr. Max Fink was aided by a fellowship from the National Foundation for
Infantile Paralysis.
2 Research Assistant, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
3 Research Director, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
4Consultant, Neuropsychiatric Division, Army Medical Service Graduate
School, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D. C.
5 Normal is used here to refer to patients without evidence of brain disease.
3

�4

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

The purpose of this study is, by the administration of the test
to a series of patients hospitalized for mental illness, to:
(l) evaluate further the diagnostic validity of the procedure;
and
(2) compare the patterns of altered symbolic expression found
in mental patients with those shown by other groups.
METHOD

Consecutive admissions to Hillside Hospital were selected. Patients who had recently received electroshock treatment or who were
clinically disoriented were excluded. Sixty-eight interviews were
essayed: eight patients refused the test, three showed insufﬁcient
physiological effects, and one patient was grossly disoriented in the
pretest interview, leaving a total of ﬁfty-six patients who were adequately studied. No attempt has been made to classify the patients
according to clinical diagnosis, although most were considered to
have schizophrenic or depressive reactions. Thirty-four women and
twenty-two men were tested, the ages ranging from sixteen to sixtyﬁve, with a median of thirty-six years.
TEST PROCEDURE

Immediately before and during the administration of amytal
sodium, each patient was examined systematically for orientation
and awareness of illness. These questions were based on previous
observation of certain patterns of disorientation and denial observed
in patients with brain disease (6, 7) and are as follows:
What is your main trouble? Why did you come here? Where are
you now? What do you call this place? What kind of place is this?
Where is this place located? How far from here do you live? Have
you ever been in any other hospital of this name? Where were you
last night? What is today’s date? What month is this? What year is
this? What time is it now? What part of the day is it? Who am I?
Have you ever seen me before?
Along with the routine test, the patients were asked two additional questions to obtain further material for the study of patterns
of symbolic expression:
If you could have one wish what would you wish for? Can you
think of a joke?
The amytal sodium was given intravenously in a solution of 0.5

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

5

gm. in 10cc. of distilled water at a rate of 0.05 gm. per minute. As
the drug was administered the patient was asked to count backwards from 100 to l. The injection was continued until the patient
showed rapid nystagmus on lateral gaze in each direction, slurred
speech, errors in counting backwards and drowsiness. These were
regarded as indicators of the physiological effects of the drug. The
total amount injected depended on the appearance of a maximal
effect of the drug. In this study the quantity given ranged from
0.2 gm. to 0.5 gm.
When the physiological action of the drug was manifest, the
patient was interviewed with the same series of questions. If an
error was made, the question was repeated immediately to determine
its persistence. Only persistent errors have been regarded as indicative of brain disease since it has been found that normal controls
may make transient mistakes (9).
RESULTS

Prior to Administration of Drug
These patients as a group showed many overt indications of fear
and distrust in the test situation. This was shown by the large
number who refused the test altogether. Some wanted to consult
their doctors or their families ﬁrst, while others were too frightened
to enter the examination room. Even among those who took the

A. Behavior

test there were numerous manifestations of distrust. Several were
reluctant to lie down—one sitting up throughout the entire procedure, one constantly keeping one foot on the ﬂoor, and several
keeping their heads raised. Many patients asked for speciﬁc details
of the test—its purpose, what drug they were getting, why they
were selected, whether this was a “truth test,” whether the results
were conﬁdential and, commonly, whether they would go to sleep
or not know what they were saying. One patient asked if he were
going to be killed. Another asked that a nurse be present. Some
patients asked us to postpone the procedure or said, “I shouldn’t
have come.” These manifestations of evasion and suspicion were
much more marked than were encountered when the test was administered to patients in general hospitals. Unlike patients with
physical diseases who usually gave as a “wish" a statement about
getting well or leaving the hospital, these patients gave many more
wishes outside the immediate situation, such as “that all men in the
universe should live in peace and harmony” or “good health for the

�6

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

sick world,” or “my daughter should
marry a nice fellow.” Further,
there was a greater tendency for patients to answer the questions
using syntax involving the third and second person as “you might
say I had a slight nervous breakdown” or “my main trouble is my

stepmother.” Patients with physical ailments are much more apt
to limit the expression of their difﬁculties to the ﬁrst
person as “I
have diabetes.”
B. Changes in Behavior Accompanying

Amobarbital Sodium

Persistent Errors: Positive Reactions
Five of the ﬁfty-six patients showed persistent changes of behavior similiar to those found in brain disease. In a previous
report
(10) positive reactions were graded from one to four plus, depending on the number of manifestations of disorientation and denial
shown. On this basis, the ﬁve positive cases in this study showed a
one plus reaction. The test was repeated in three of these cases and
showed a persistence of the one plus result in two and a negative
result in the third. Of these ﬁve patients, three showed evidence of
brain disease by other methods of study. One, a boy of eighteen, had
a positive face-hand test (2), an abnormal EEG record, and an
elevated spinal ﬂuid protein on two occasions. Another was a case
of Parkinsonism. The third showed a
memory defect on psychological tests. One was a sixty-four-year—old man who persistently
referred to “Sydenham Hospital” while under the inﬂuence of the
drug. He had a normal EEG and no presumptive evidence of brain
disease. The other patient located the hospital in “Oakland Park”
after having placed it correctly in Glen Oaks prior to receiving the
drug. The second administration of the test in this man gave a
negative result.
1.

Transient Errors
Transient errors (i.e., errors which were either spontaneously
corrected or corrected when the question was immediately repeated)
in orientation and awareness of illness have not been regarded as
diagnostic indices of brain damage. In persons with physical incapacities, the incidence is low, having been found in 16
cent
per
of the original series of ﬁfty control subjects (9). In the
present
study, however, eighteen patients, or 32 per cent, made such errors.
These included giving the incorrect year, naming the place as “Hillside Oaks" and “Psychiatric Institute” and confabulating
having
2.

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

7

been at home or in a friend’s house the night before. Some patients
used euphemisms such as “a place to help people get well,” “a place
for recuperation,” “a place to teach health to sick people,” “a
clinic,” and “the greatest hospital with the most stupendous doctors,” whereas prior to receiving the drug they had simply stated
that they were in “Hillside Hospital.” When the questions were
repeated, however, the original response was again given.

Other Alterations in Language
The use of the second or third person in response to questions
about illness and hospitalization was noted twice as frequently as
in the pre-drug interview. Another person became the subject of the
sentence or another person performed the action or became involved in an experience, whereas previously the patient had described his symptoms in the ﬁrst person. Thus the reason for
hospitalization originally given by one patient as “I was getting
worse and desperate for help” was changed to “the hospital had a
lovely reputation.” Another patient who had detailed his problems
in the ﬁrst person before receiving the drug talked about a friend
who had cancer. The change frequently took the form of concern
over the health of relatives. The wish “that I never get sick" was
changed to “I wish that my kid would stay well.” There was more
of a tendency to employ clichés as “nothing to fear but fear” and
”not for publication.” There was also more selective speciﬁcity in
answer to questions. Thus patients who had originally said that they
had come to the hospital for some illness replied that they had come
because their doctors had sent them. Other patients gave their location in a more precise way, stating for example that they were in
“a treatment room leading off the corridor.” Cryptic remarks were
occasionally given, as in the instance of the patient who, when asked
for a wish, said “If you could help me out then I wish you wouldn’t,
and if you could then I wish you would.”
These patterns were not qualitatively different from those used
by patients with physical incapacities where displacement to the
third or second person, greater speciﬁcity and selectiveness of response and increased use of clichés and slang also occur.
3.

4. Jokes

In many patients the response to the request to tell a joke seemed
to be a symbolic representation of some problem relating to illness,
hospitalization, the procedure itself or their interpersonal relations.

�KAHN ——FINK—WEIN STEIN

8

The content of these responses in relation to the illness will be
considered in a separate paper and only the pattern will be reported

here. Of ﬁfty-three patients, ﬁfteen did not respond either before
or during drug administration. Eleven patients answered by referring literally to their difﬁculties as “It would be a good joke if I
could go home,” or “The joke is my being here." Six patients used
this type of personal reference both before and during the administration of the drug, while ﬁve responded in this fashion only after
injection. Thirty-two patients gave the usual form of structured
joke, the account of the action or experience of some third person
symbolizing some aspect of the patient’s problems or motivation.
Usually patients who responded to the question in this fashion in
the pre-drug interview used the same pattern after the injection.
Seven told the same joke, while different stories were related in
ﬁfteen instances. Here the tendency was toward a more allegorical
representation of the problem. Eight patients told a joke before
receiving the drug but not after, while eight related a story only
with the drug.

Psychomotor Reactions
These changes included withdrawal, overactivity, alterations in
mood and the appearance of comic or melodramatic “ludic”6 behavior. Twelve patients showed withdrawal reactions. In the extreme form the patient failed to respond to any questions for periods
ranging from several minutes to half an hour. In other instances
the questions had to be repeated several times to elicit a response,
there was incoherent mumbling or neologisms, and incomplete
sentences were used. As such times the withdrawal appeared to be a
selective process, since the inadequate response occurred primarily
with questions relating to the patient’s illness. When questions of a
more innocuous nature were asked, such as the date or time of day,
the patient often answered quickly, clearly and completely. Marked
withdrawal has been unusual in control patients in general hospitals but has occurred frequently in patients with brain disease.
Ten patients were overactive during the test. Usually this consisted
of restlessness, shivering, rhythmic movements of the head, hips or
legs, eye blinking, or repeated fussing and adjusting of clothing.
One patient showed behavior which resembled catatonic posturing.
5.

6Ludic is the term used by Jean Piaget (5) to describe the play, imitating
and pretending aspects of behavior in young children. See also VVeinstein et a1.
(8)-

�”AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

9

Alterations in mood were noted in sixteen patients. The
predominant change was in a euphoric direction, although in two
cases the patient became tearful and depressed toward the close of
the interview. Euphoria was shown by increased smiling, giggling
or laughing, joking and expressions of well-being. Some patients
commented that they thought they had “one drink too many."
Paranoid attitudes as indicated by threatening remarks and gestures
and cursing were sometimes intermingled with euphoric manifestations. Thus one patient, who said he felt good and “would like this
more often,” answered with such expressions as “What do you think
it is, you goddamn fool” and “How the hell would I know.” The
incidence and degree of these euphoric and paranoid reactions was
comparable to those previously found in both normal control and
brain diseased groups.
Varying degrees of ludic behavior were shown, but were especially prominent in sixteen patients. In several cases this behavior
was noted in counting backwards while the drug was being injected by variation in tempo, alternately slow and fast, or use of a
sing-song rhythm. One patient barked out the numbers in a staccato
fashion, while another overemphasized the pronunciation in telephone operator fashion. One patient responded throughout the interview with an exaggerated syllabic accent and dramatic
pauses.
Another used “French” expressions such as “00, la, la.” Several
staggered excessively when brought back to the ward, particularly
when they were in sight of the other patients. One patient, who
acted in a dramatic, comic manner throughout the test,
spontaneously remarked, “I need applause.” Such ludic behavior is difﬁcult
to grade statistically but was in general more marked than had been
observed in the previously studied control
groups.
Six women patients showed some form of altered sexual behavior
under the inﬂuence of the drug. This ranged from holding the examiner’s hand and such remarks as “dear” to the behavior of one
patient who tried to kiss the examiner. A few others manifested hip
movements suggestive of sexual activity or partly exposed themselves in restless leg movements.
DISCUSSION

The results of the study provide further evidence of the validity
of the procedure as a diagnostic test for the existence of structural
brain disease. Of the ﬁfty-six patients tested, “positive” results were

�10

KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

obtained in ﬁve. The others showed behavior more like that of
patients without evidence of brain damage in that they did not
develop enduring patterns of disorientation or persisting delusional
denial of illness and incapacity. In a previous study of psychotic
patients in a state hospital (9) , only one of twenty-ﬁve, a sixty-fouryear—old woman hospitalized for thirty-ﬁve years, had a positive result, a one plus response. This compares with a ﬁgure of 1 to 2
per cent positive in over one hundred and ﬁfty normal controls and
an incidence of 65 per cent in over four hundred patients with brain
disease tested in two general hospitals. It may be concluded that
while it is possible for a patient without demonstrable brain disease to yield a positive result, the difference between patients with
brain disease and other groups is statistically signiﬁcant.
In three of the ﬁve cases giving positive results, there was other
evidence of brain disease. One patient had Parkinsonism, in another
the clinical history and ﬁnding suggested a chronic encephalitis,
while in the third, degenerative or arteriosclerotic disease of the
brain was likely. One of the other positive results was found in a
patient over sixty years of age. Adequate control studies on the
effect of age on the results of this test have not yet been completed.
It is possible, however, that positive reactions may occur in older
persons comparable to the ﬁnding of slow waves in the EEG record
(1) and to changes in the perception of simultaneous tactile stimuli
(2, 3). These results suggest that in a group of patients with “functional” psychoses there are some with disease of the brain which
of
methods
of
the
be
demonstrated
by
appropriate
application
may
examination. The amytal procedure and the face-hand test of perceptual function introduced by M. B. Bender and associates (2)
are examples of such techniques and should be employed as part
of the diagnostic work-up of a mental hospital.
In considering the alterations in symbolic expression shown by
these patients it is necessary to review some data relating to the
mechanisms of disorientation for place and time and denial of
illness. These phenomena are not defects directly attributable to
brain damage in the sense that they are the manifestations of
the loss of a functional modality represented in some area of the
brain. They are, rather, forms of adaptation or defense that the
patient uses in situations of stress in a milieu of altered neural function. In disorientation, the misnamed time or place is the symbolic
representation of some motivation of the patient, usually related to
his illness, not a manifestation of memory defect. Thus the patient

�“AMYTAL TEST” IN MENTAL ILLNESS

11

is

apt to state a time antedating his illness; to give the name of a
small hospital or a place where he has been for some trivial illness;
to locate the hospital near his home; or to confabulate that he has
left the hospital. In effect, the patient is expressing his
problems in
another language where places, persons and times are not used in
their original referential context but as vehicles for the
expression
of the individual’s own motivations. Although an
impairment of
brain function is necessary to provide the type of neural organization for the maintenance of this new symbolic system, the behavior
itself is the result of the interaction of a number of factors—what
Wilder (12) has called the organism-environment-observer complex. This includes not only the neural organization, but the fact
of the disability itself, the patient’s motivation to be well, the interpersonal situation of the interview, and the patient’s previous life
experience and personality. For example, if the interview is carried
out with sterile water, there are very few changes in language. Patients with similar brain lesions may show markedly different
reactions under amytal sodium because of different
types of personality
and attitudes toward incapacity. It is quite conceivable that if this
test were carried out under very stressful conditions as in a
concentration camp, then disorientation and delusional denial might
occur in persons without evidence of brain damage.
In interpreting the effects of barbiturates one must distinguish
between purely neurophysiological manifestations such as
nystagmus
and alterations in the EEG record, which occur universally, and
adaptive symbolic changes such as withdrawal, ludic behavior,
humor, disorientation and changes in syntactical tense and
person.
It has been pointed out that even such indubitable neurological
manifestations as drowsiness and ataxia operated as language as well.
The amytal procedure is a stressful one and, contrary to
popular
belief, the drug does not “abolish” anxiety but rather provides
a
milieu where it is converted much as a schizophrenic uses a delusional system or a dreamer expresses a problem in
hallucinatory

personiﬁcations.

The relation of humor to other forms of symbolic adaptation

was of interest. Some of the jokes given used the mechanism of disorientation as in the case of the patients who referred to a hospital
(West Hill) as “Mess Hill,” or to “Hillside Cabaret.” Others used
verbal denial, as stating that the reason for coming to the
hospital
was “because I’m well.” In the usual structured joke the

patient

represented his problems in language involving third persons, more

�KAHN—FINK—WEINSTEIN

12

material symbols (often relating to sex, food, death and violence)
and the past tense.
From this study one cannot state that mental illness is or is not
an “organic” condition. What can be stated is that these patients
exist in a very stressful environment. This is evident not only by
behavior before receiving the drug but by the larger number of
transient errors in orientation and awareness of illness, the greater
occurrence of ludic behavior and withdrawal and the more frequent
use of clichés, euphemisms and expressions involving the third and
second person as compared to the responses of patients in a general
hospital.
SUMMARY

The amytal test was given to ﬁfty-six patients in a mental
hospital. Five patients, three with other evidence of brain damage
yielded a positive result. The results are interpreted as giving further evidence of the value of the procedure as a diagnostic test for
brain damage.
2. Mental hospital patients showed more transient disorientation and denial, more withdrawal and ludic behavior and more
changes in the syntactical aspects of language than did a group of
patients with physical disabilities, but without evidence of brain
damage previously studied in a general hospital.
3. It is considered that this greater use of means of symbolic
adaptation is additional evidence that patients with mental illness
operate in a milieu of greater stress than patients with physical
1.

incapacities.

REFERENCES
Barnes, R. H., Busse, E. W., and Silverman, A. J.: Prevalence and Signiﬁcance of Electroencephalographic Abnormalities in Normal Old People,
Third Inter. Congress of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 79.
(2) Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld, 111.: Charles C. Thomas,
(1)

1952.

Fink, M., Green, M., and Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
(4) Green, M. and Bender, M. B.: Cutaneous Perception in the Aged. A. M. A.
Arch. Neurol. (9 Psychiat., 69:577-581. 1953.
(5) Piaget, J.: Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York: W. W.
Norton, 1951.
(6) Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Syndrome of Anosognosia. Arch. Neurol.
&lt;5. Psychiat., 64:772-799. 1950.
(3)

�“AMYTAL TEST" IN MENTAL ILLNESS
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)

(ll)
(12)

13

Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Patterns of Disorientation in Organic
Brain Disease. J. Neuropath. &amp; Clin. Neurol., 1:214-225, 1951.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugannan, L.: Ludic Behavior in Patients with Brain Disease. This Journal, 3:98-106, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Brain Disease. Am. ].
Psychiat., 109:889-894, 1953.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Malitz, 8.: Serial Administration of the “Amytal Test” for Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and
Prognostic Value. A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. (S- Psychiat., 71 :217-226, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A. and Malitz, 8.: Changes in Symbolic Expression with Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”). Am. ]. Psychiat., 111:198-206, 1954.
Wikler, A.: Opiate Addiction. Springﬁeld, 111.: Charles C. Thomas, 1952.

�u. «a...

as "am; W'

I!

’51!”

um MM.» 1m.

L. tell. ”.3.
mm:
LB. 0
III
A. "mun.
mt:nu.

leuelegloel mm e! Innu- lealul
beetle
lent um
halal. lee reel.

and

W1

me.
the

_Mlmulgetmmiapnmu
mtnmmmzm
e! the”
tau-teen
m Develop-at lee“. eum
e!
le. WM‘MWIQH‘.

tummmwu
tree the hilly meme “metal...
mu

by e teller-up tree the hum). mum tel- Intent“.
um
mm».
1'

�-L.

IOC.‘C utudicﬂ unﬁt daunuutlntod

$ht

thll .2 I‘llllinu

nnytul social in n atasunntte it‘s for $h0 990...». o! Irtta dn-ugo.
(1) (I) (a). ends: the tazluouat a! this drug. olrtntn chnaat- tu
aria-Sutton uni usnrunnsu a! allnouu ocuurrod 1a pattoutn with brain
«titan. tint rural, appotrod 1n.p¢:soaa without Innmnn%rublo brutn
pathology. 1!... eunuch. tnoludnd‘pattowan a! asaowttntnttoa tar
plint. tin. uni pariah an! vtrhul dauttl at 111...! “In incapacity.

studs... «tint pattatts a! alturod nyuboxto
nzpvtnnton turn found in addition to tin «hangs: in ortaatntion Ind
umnrououu 01 11150.: oaaurrtns in tin pronanan a! hrtta dtiitli. It
Inthnao

II.

indicatod that thaiq «tannin in vurbu: p$ttara :ad nonpvcrbul
Impact. 01 bahtvtor tantrihatod ta II Indornt‘ndtag at tho psychophyltologtanl cttnots a! tin drug and ti. 203’ 01 ltlcuugo 1n &amp;dnp~
an... ‘0
until no. tho control cramp. it's colltntnd a! puttnuta
with yortphcr:l atria. cptnsl root In! our! lotion: ant Ilaccllnanoun
Indian: uni aarglaul cauda‘anun. that. In: boon no IyItOIttlo tuvnut-

am.

“me. a: ”that: an aunt unu- Wat“ can mm»

Ital: chain's.

It. pntpoactot

a! tit
tant to n Intton 01 pnxtoutu Inuvitaltaod In! unatal £11.»... to:
1) ovuluntc turthnr tho dtucuncttc validity at tho pcooo‘uro. 3“

this study in,

by the administration

“to ”tum o: um «smug W1“ tom 1We
units: 3&amp;ttoat- with than; lhﬂ'! otlur
a)

ﬁg

Omnnﬂcustv.

putt-3t.

udltltlous t6

grunts.

lllllidt lonpltul v.39

lcloatod.

i£d vacantly rocutv.‘ olnatmoachoot trtatnnax or who v.90
alt-teal}: diaorinntoi tor. IIBII‘O‘a $11t1~tiﬁht satcrvltun U‘f.
0:33:06. night ytttauta twinned tho taut. thruc alumna innutttctou‘
who

�«i-

an
unattaiul “1mm. m m ”that m puny (Wham m
pro-um utmm. than; a to“; a! to nun“ m m: mm“);
“in“. I. “W m m and. u “but, tho 3““th «mam

iuhtsam
ta cltntail diucaoati. u1*&amp;auci ﬂout ttri caln$dtru£ $6 is?!
and 13 I»
mm
mutton.
nutptm
at
pm“

tum:

W“.
a.“ mum Inn 16» u.

«an

with a

“can at

:1

m

mn.

him and data; m taunts-anon a mu].
owl-taunt); a:
mm. «a ”that u: «and tutmumuy tar
”atom. at “luau. W muons an band on ”aim anor—
nuou at «mun ”km a! amtntnun n4 «aux ohm“ n
”tints um um. “um (42 (a) m m u sum:
laminae-1y

an truth? It: am you cm W? "on
mahmnutmpw Wimotymutm?

me

grammar?

1: your

mum
mutuapuu MM? ”iu'tmhmumuuv
mm but a m at!» man: at an W? M «It you an
this?
night? Int M W's «in? Int mill 1. ti“? “at ya: it
1- st?
u. n I!“ m
a! the
that “no

n It an" Inn put

«or ms In

“in"

a:

m

Am vi.“ ti. mtm Mt. tho ”$1.31! m and «udtuml mum to out“: turn“ mum: to: at um 01 5mm

0! "about: cat’s-«Mon:

I!
you

that 0!

n

m on“ haw Mu mu mt mu m ”at In? a»
39“?

m mu: mm an aim mum}: 1: a «mum at

«utum mm at a an a! 0.0! h at! mm”.
tho ”that m and to «on»
A. a.
manta“
I“
m
no: 109 to 1. m tumult us mum“ at“ no pun.“ am
up“ ”um a am: use an m “mu“. “m“. an“. as
cm" a: own“ mm“ m mun». nu. ma «sum

0.5 in 1. 10“. of

W“

�*3.

“amm- o: u. mum: «tau a: no a... no tout mt

injnotod anyondcd on tin apptsrnnno a! u naslnnl uxtcnt at tho trig.
In tut! atudy tan qﬁnntttr 311:3 rascal iron 0.! an to 0.5 03.
than tan phyulaloﬂianl nation .1 ti. drug was nunttosﬁ.
tic pgttoat In. xitcrvtvvud with t). nguo tartan o! quoutituﬂ. I! an
¢rror was main ﬁn. quanttnn.van rtpuutod aluodiutcly to actor-tn. its
parttatinaa. a;1y porutntant armor: Igru boon rngnvdod an tudtsattvo
u! truth dtuouou 31am. 3% hi. but: tound that tarsal auntrolu any unit
ttuamiant nintulou (1).
. Inhavtar

.

in» t9

.

13$: uttan

a:

.

rtcnc paticut. us I grow» ﬁlowud Inn, owurt tﬁdlaattanl a!
tour Iii Ctnﬁrtﬂt in tit tilt iitlutttu. fhti was shall. by tho titan
:nlbcr vb» 2633.06 tho tout nltogntlor. Son. iua&amp;cd ta calault that!
doctor: at tint: inntltan 1131:. watt. othsru war. tau frightenud to
.ﬁtﬂ? tho caantnattoa soon. 3"» 3.3:; than. via tcotilhu its: that!
unit nalbcraus naniloatnttonu at dintwuat. Savnrul ﬂirt raiuotaat at
1:. 401a - on. ﬂitting up throughout the cutaro procedurc. on. Gonna

illtll Utopia: all fact on tin 1100:.

ktuptlt that! than
tttaad. Inns patients tutti tor apoettta Gettilu a! tit tout - it:
’II’OIO, Ihlt drug thaw tut. ;n%tlug. why the: It?! uoln¢t0d. Ihnthnr
this II! a ”truth tant”. Ibuthor ti. results var. euniidnntlll and.
unusual}. vhnthnr that would 30 ta slut; at not hunt want ti.) Ilrt
nsgtuc. an. putaoat Into: 1: ho vIrQ '91-; to h. hillod. Aunthnr
3330‘ thtt : turn. be pruunnt. I... tatttntn ‘33ud an to potty-nu
and acvarul

tun granular. or 3‘1: "I abouldn't 5": ¢nnn.” than. u:a110ututtona
o: ovation sad tuapaeton vars haul an». marina than unto announsqrud
thin tun tout 1‘s tdiiﬂiutCtOd to putIQntu 1: stunts! Inu3ttnls. BIltkn pntiontu with phyttaul alsoasu: vim usuully 3:1: ti s "stat” a

st;tunnnt than:

Iﬂ‘tllt will or tnavta: It: houpttul.

thQﬂi puttonsg

�'T

ant: taro Uilhll autitda tn. tumullnta nttnsti‘g. Inch ll “tilt
:11 3‘: in tin IIIVirﬂO should 11'. in punau an: h:rnouy* tr ”good
intlth 1.! tin ntct unfit? II ”I; liﬂ‘ht‘t nhnuld ﬂirty a lion tollut.'
turthurunmt. titan vat &amp; [rcattr toxicity in tit: group in czar... tilt:

gnu.

distthXttnu in turns .1 aqua athnr pcraan :3 ”13!.Iiﬂht an: I but a
llxaht Iorvcuu trashinvn” OH “I, uni: trout}: in ny‘ugglagthtr.”
Alﬁhtthtta1_sndtuu.
1) lorntutcna gyrornz ﬁthttvo Innattona
11'! a! ti. ‘0 pattnust nhnuod pcruzatant ohms... of Io~
hgvtor stutlir co tin-c could in hrtlu ﬂaunt... it u IIU'IOII rarest
(l).puuattvu tauntinn: that gvnlud tron an» to soar plus anpculinc en
ti. lumbar at nuntloatuttoan a! itnursoattttoa nah 6.33:1 chain. on
tbtt 5.31.. tho lava pontttvo «use: 1: :81: study thou-d a an; plus
roasting. it. tout was rcpoutud tn turn: at those «:30: sud-nbolod a
ports-tuna: a! th. an. plan rauult in tun and n Ingnttvc ranalt 1n tho
thlrd. a: than: £11. putxnntn. turn: lhﬂlid «vidnnoc of hrtln taunts.
by athnr nothads oi atudy. Out. a haw 01 It. had a pauittvu Inoonhlnl
ﬁtnt (6). ti 33:09:51.356 toourd. sun nu titrated uptunl fluid protoil
on two Oﬂﬂhﬁtﬂll. Anetta: it! u «an. o: Paritnnantnn. r30 thtrt attuan psych-mun mu. mam: at tho
u. a
in: vus$ttvn an... had 0th.: ﬂiﬂll of br‘tn diﬁtllﬂ. an. In: t 64 run:
91‘ Inl‘vho porbtltontly tOIOWROd to ”Byﬂnahnl annpttnl" ‘hili ands!
tho inslumauo at tho drug. It had a nnrnnl BEG :34 no prouu-pttwu
Ovtdtiui a! brain dtloan¢. ﬁt. othtr puttnut loath4 1h; Ioaptt‘l ti
"auklaua.snrlﬁ altar h‘vtnc pinata it narroatlv in exam Oahu proav to
rtoutving tho drug. Tin ﬂaccid tautntntrttaon at tho toit in this has
'

,

m

,

.-‘

,

..

at»:

unvb n.3oust110

mum

litﬂltn

a) trgggtnut Irrorns
1r£anxcns array: (a.¢§

iVFORﬂ

'hiﬂh var: otthot $90.30

ulnouuly corrected or oowrnotod who: tn» ancatian nun iuuodttttly
rn’nntnd) tn cranniatlnn and :nurvaaas a: titans: haw. not bat: ra~

�ubm

mm u «W‘u u but; «an.

:3

ampmm: nun. .mm:Oriﬂﬂlﬂl

a! ti.
untowar. II
unaxrol.tﬁbsn¢tu (1). In the preaeat «tidy.

Icaad
nclttou. tin zlcilnnno in luv. hxvais b¢tn

aortas of

no

£3 19%

includod ¢$Viit tho luaorroct
puttomnn, or 33%. III» neat trworx. rant.
eats" au‘ *ﬂtyuhtntrtn Initituad'
ti"”l111l$dl
91:30
in.
Iﬂhlﬁl
than.
ﬁﬁ hunt or 1‘ a friend’s blunt ‘hn utult
hon:
tiring
ochlttulnt1:¢
tat
such I» "t plaoc to but. .0033.
boxorc. Ian. pustunau «nod cuphauttul
”a piaan t¢ tctah honlth to bank
rtcnpcrnttan,"
tar
"a
plan;
vu11.*
not
hospital with tun not: ntmaunduuu
panama.” ”u “Ilhtﬂ” tad “thy cronttst
drag char but simply
tut
rocctvin:
to
print
shnranu
I!!!
dilitrﬂ.”

mm

“at thy um “I 331th ”pittl.”

M ﬂan motion! m

Bivtﬂ.
rtponxtd. tunnvnr. tun arisinnl rampant. run anti:

tbs lacuna at third airman in rtuponun to
was Intod twist it lrcqummh
and
hospitaltnttion
i11n¢as
about
qunuttaun
booth. in» iﬂhaoct 0!
pinion
anothir
tuttrviov.
yrcudvuc
tin
1:
1: as
or stain. turalvod
tcttau
the
patterned
parucn
santhar
or
tbs statnan:
had dynaribuﬁ it:
tun
patio-t
prcvtauuxy
'hnr¢xa
exportnnoo
1: an
for huapttnltnutmu:
ayuntuun in it! first action. Tins til ratio:
Thu

‘

at. at

mm m mum
«umxu :19“ by an ”aunt u «z umhad”um
’
1
lowly
"mum.”
"the
mun.
in law In abused to
uobnll in tho mm mm
n:
«mud
m
m
“tun
am

m

Thu Qﬁﬂlll

drug tnlknd thaut a tritnd who htd onnaor.
0N0! ﬁlo htnlth a! tolnttvos. tho
aonauru
at
for:
tha
toot
trcqnoutly
vuuld
ohuugud to "t ui¢l that my
on:
tie!“
Invue
jut
“thnﬁ
t
Isak

tiaalrtac tho

ill

ntny unit.“ Thar.
"anth&amp;ac

mo

was

tare

Qt

1:32 but taut? and

eliahlitii an
?Iot tar yubllcntten.* that. in: tits

;.tondna¢y ta 0:919:

¥uun puttanss It.
stloattva spoctitatty in audit! to quantlaun.
for non. 111:..hanpttul
tho
ca
has
oust
tan:
that
said
had originally
doowtrs ha! tilt $hﬂl. Git“!
rtrllo‘ thtt tbs! had noun inaiuat tbttr

Iowa

�cxuupla
ﬁnalists guru that: Iﬁﬂltibt tn t not. ’Uﬂaiiﬂ way stuttn‘ tar
that tic: ivy. In ”t traatngut roe. lindins at! thc corridor."
in tho Lustunaa at tho
cryptic tilt!!! taro ocaasleually [1103 I!
could help :0 out thin
p;t1¢nt who. who: 13306 :0: a 11.». 3‘14 ":1 you

I with

you

3: you «call than I with you wasti‘.
Thiﬂi pattorna Iﬁft net aititrant 12am thus. used ﬂy

itnlau‘t.

ti!

tho tutti-or
patient: vtth-phynsnnl.tnaa'ooittcl that. dtnplnetntut to
Ind
atonnd yoxuau. gruntnr apoetliaity and .alnctzvonou: a: ruppoulu
at
tn¢rosaod use of aliahﬁi and ﬁltﬂﬂ tor. notud uadmr tbs tnfluttcc

tn. drug.
4» 12w.

In I311 pstttntn thﬂ rouyoano to thc rtﬂﬂﬂit in tall 3
prﬁbluu rulnttng
John doc-Id to-ba &amp; tribulia rupwosuntntson of nuns
inaction.
$0 illnous. houpttalinstion. tn: procedurc ttaclt or tint:
centidnrcdv
ﬁnial rolttxuns. 1h: aoutont at tats. rﬁiwﬁﬂﬂtl will bu

at “
hint.
rcpartud
b.
vtll
p&amp;t$ara
and
9.17
it.
papa:
Iipttttﬂ
udllutnn
53 pntiauts, 16 did not roapond cathnr hetero or ﬂaring dru;
4111£~
trutian. llovun pattcnt- aavvcr-d hyirntorrtn; ta thsir can
x!
:nltiua 1n tun {ﬁrst yuruon.uu¢h a. “:t would b. a spot int. I
anal
could no hunt? or “thy Join in my bctns but.." at: paﬁtuttn
adulntna
thin try: at purnaanl rctcronan both taint. gut dating tin
tr;tton $1 tun drug '31:. 11v: runpondnd tn thln~£aahtnn only titar
utructurdd
Alénottob. titrtrwtvo pattuats guru thn asunl turn at
an a

'

a: tilt third
303:. In theta. tho taaouax a! tin unttnn.ur umpnrtonn;
tritium: or
par-on :ppnutcd to nyutalauo not. :upnct a! £3. pnttnmt‘a
‘hau
nottvuttog. annuity pttzalas who rcupondod to tho «nosttoa a:
ch.
1133103 in tin primdntg antirvxcv unad tho ‘5‘; pattutn nitat
wail. ‘lfiﬂﬂliti
indaatxon. aovoa 01 than. patlnntn told tho I!IO John

It:

tovird
ﬂoat}
might
pattonta
problem.
th.
at
reprouontatton
u not. ulltgnrtcal

static: war. rolatod in

15

tantsaats. In?! tho tnaluley

: ”John” bum mum m» m m an aura ran. um: um“

"

�1 47“

2.13th

3)

Gianna. tualudod withﬁruuul, avarauttvtty. ultaruttouu.
u'pnnrunnn 91 unite er lixodrnuttta ”ladle” hohavtor.

an...

in loot uni

tit

it: Cruz.

th:

rulntud a story 011, with

Tvtlvu pataontn thaw-d Itil‘rllII rcaattous. Ia tho lﬂtlﬂll for. tho
puticut tuilod ca rosyend to any quantaonn tow ported: 13:11.. luau
novtrnl innntdn co halt II hour. In othnr anutnuaau tho quouttunn had

rntpnauo; tint. In: tn:ohorou‘
Innhltagi or analogiaua and tuna-plat. Icutcnunu Iﬂrﬂ ulna. At ﬁnch
tans. tin withdrawal sayqarcd t: to u solauttvu pruuocs s‘nuc tin
tu§d¢QIuto roupous¢ oocurrvd 9:133:11: with qn3;ttona rotating O0 tit
ptttont’u illnonu. what quatttoun a! u ﬁﬁ!‘ tuaoaunnn tﬂtﬂrﬁ via.

to

no rapdutna,novurnl

tin.» ta ﬁliait

int. or its. a!

n

tin pattnlt often unnuoraé
unwakly. «13:91: and aauplntcty. quknd Itthlrmlal in: not: unnuunl
control puxlontu ta ulnar:l hospitnln hut in: oaaurrod tttqucntly tn

taint.

such an tho

dag,

LI

patxcntn ittl hrt13.d1:0uno. Tb: patient: unto ovorlutivn aural. tho
303:. Inﬁnity tit: countutod 0d *hyttuta uncut-at: of tan baud. at»:
or Inna. a}. bliskiuu, a? v.9uxtod iﬁlﬁiﬂﬂ and adaasttt' at elatitla.
taunting: tho pttitnxu boos-n vary riitlaan. nut up in 5.6. sud Inliltti
on having a algnrottu. an. unison: sinned prolalcou uhtvurinc at It:
Uliil. bcdy tor nlvurll Iiiﬂlﬁﬂ. titular thuvud bthnvtnr vital roan
cabana ontntostc ponawtnc. uponttnaoualy balding an. urn in it: at!
law atvbrnl utuutou and thin holdtu. 1t 1: vnrtnu$ paitttain pliant by
tho Usualllr.

(stilts:

11%.?t‘tﬁll 1n toad taro nottd in 16 putlontu. it. pr.»
aunt‘s was an “uuptnrtc diruction, lithouch in its 0...: ‘DG

pgttuut itann. tanrlul sad Quartilud tawgra tun alone at tho 1n$¢rvtau.
Implawta in: slow: by tactanlod untltic, ﬂtltltit'or laughtng. 5ohuu|
Ind larvalﬂtalt a! vullabltlc. I... pitttttu Gauntltad thtt tho! KIII‘I
thoucbt tho! hut ”on. GU!!! ‘00 I031.“ ﬁhranotd attituinu In tattontod

�.3.

w tantalum

min mm mm and mm m mum at”.

utnclod~vith ouphnrta unntfoutattann. it»: on. pattuns, who till I!
:alt 330‘ and “vtuld 1110 than unto otttu.” antvmmtd quanta... with

such tzpwnanlauu us “that «a you tat-k it in. IE“ dealt-n 10.1” and
“not
boll ﬁﬂﬂl‘ 1 tauv.” Thu iactdnnoa :nn anuvau a! thil. oaptartc
ranutxoun was cougarghln tn than. pravtausly tau-d in both nor-n1

it.

«0.12.1 sad

ital:

dilussud cvuuva.

Vurvtng ingrown

a! suit. inhuviac var. Ihﬂiu, but

IOU.

ill

patxonln. In ntvbru1.oaaan this hohtvtur
it. until in tint! stunting baakaurd; Ihili tin drag It; 301:: imitatod.
I... vurtod in. tango o1 th¢ir oonattac. altnrnntcly ﬁlﬁ' sun 1.3:, at
tuna a tiuzwaanc rhythm. an. patient bartnd out tit IHIDUII it m

aaaoaiullr vauntntnt in

16

mm» mm“ um» mtm mwmam m wmntm :-

‘ollphonn aparttor annulus. ga. pntitnt rcopouaol tittaghnut tin
tstnrvtuv wit! nxxugnrntud nyllnbta unacnt gun druuutic pant... tn0$lr
ﬂﬂﬁ‘ ”triath“ oxproﬁntens Inch an "an. 1:. 1:.” low «In! uttsunro‘

mainly ma brought m: to m ward. platinum” um an in
in stgtt at tho ether pstiaats. out

Bitiltt,

who

actod in s art-nth:

tin taut. upongannaunly tauntini *1 li.‘
applause.” Inch ladle huha'tor is diffiuult to grad. stutlctlonlly
but it. In contra! not. ItrlOd thin 3:6 30.. abuarvtd in tin prtvtouuly
ntullol control Iron...
81: canon puttuntu ibﬂ'ﬂd saw. for. of ﬁlitrﬂd count; it»
hatter and»: In. anxlutncc at tho crux. thia raaaod tron tilting ch!
onnninug’u It‘d and Vbrhtl rauurln can: a: calling than “dust" to tho
huhuvtor or an. putlatt uh. triad to Etna ti. nunuiulr. A for atlnru
ratatou‘od It: Invoucnt: Ilcguatlvn at ﬁtuual activity at ynrtly-oa’0001
tin-n.1th in rattloul 10c Invclcntc.
gnu «nude unannr throughout

axncuasxal

the tumult: a! tin Itﬁﬂr gravid. :uritur duta ro'nrlilc

�.9-

"1““,

u imam tut far can «tum.

a
a! the prwodum
tho
at tho M
of aluminum: In“:

“at“.
mun: nu. chum a ﬂu.

the

”an“ mud ”yo-tun"

mo nu
um um Mint”
ma ‘W 1- “ti up: in an

«item 0!.
Malay Mum ”am“ of imam-gm or mama. «luau:
mu). «1’ ﬁlm: as may. :3 a ”cum “W a! ”you“:
”that: in a at“. butt“ (1). only an o! a. n a you on

“at

a! put-«tn without

m
M

manna“ for 8! ms, and n mitt" m1: 0! «a 31m.
is» I “an a: 1 «u ”out” m1“ u our no m1
mmh m n inseam. 01 m 1- m m ”cm“ with ma
“mu mm 1: ma «mu mmn. It my be 0.01““ an
nth it is with]; as! n ”that without mwu mm diam
to ”on I; ”out" mum. at “um ham “than with ma
a nutuuully Ituutmt.
“mu and «w
In that. a! m 11" um [um mitt” rm!“

W

W

um

"um 0! mm dam...umon patient

t”
In mum-um,
1n

1mm “warm I am“ cumulanu. an. u: an um. “mu” «- Wlmlmua am» 1.at
the mm «a $13013.
with. malt nu cm a on ”ﬂat
this study a ”11 u u m at tho ”than panama mac n a

man an «11.5.»: “um
A

“no mun who m cm to you: at an. uncut. «um: “mm
an have not ant to»
a no on.“ a: u- n the min a!tutthismm.”
mum In new
mum. It a with)...
to no than: u um am a tit m
1: on,»
mm. “I
not“ (7) m t.
a th- wart“. if imlﬁm
a! nun!
”in.“ with an“). “no m1“ «can! tut in g
0! ﬂu in“
Ilth ~mum1" Wm thin II! to m '1“!
«17 by tin ”pliant“ 0!
nun a: in
I“ m tam-nu tut
utm a: ommtm. a» “muby
and minus: (a)
Ll.
at ”mutual {mun
m min a! mu Manna» an autumn he ”any“ 1: wt a: th

W.
man

W cm

man“

new

m

W.W

W
Watt

�VF

.

«10~

"T

diacloottc Iﬂrknl’ or ;.ann$n1 hanpttgx.
1‘ annitdbriac tun nltatﬁtiuna in mytholis czprunatoa about:
by than. pltliitu it in noccuuary an raviiw you: grovioua ﬁttn t01n¢tll‘
mo tho Ianlsnlsuu a! luu;:tcntnttol for place tad ttloihnd 6.31:1
at
tllnnat. It hit but: 589*! tit: thouo phanouana 3!! an: 60:06:: Iaroain
I: nttrthutuhlo ta brill using. 1113!. runs; that tiny arc tun maﬁtfilu
rattan: or tut In“: or u :uaaiiennl 001.11%: rcprcn-ntod 1: I... tent
at tho brain, Thur arc. rtthnr. tor-a at ninytutton or ﬁotcnsn that
It. pntltut usnn in situations a: Itvcsa in n niltau of altcrcd luaral
inacttnn. In dxnurinututiau, ti. stanuuqd tine-at plan. in tha uylhtiaa
ruprcuontutxum or new; letifttiﬂl a¢_thn ynttunt. usually thst a! hdbu
GOItI¢ null and iota: homo ant a nanatoatntlou at 19:: a! unwary. That
it: gattnnt in apt to stttn a tint untoautiuc :1: 11130.33 to .11: tit
a... a: a small hospital at &amp; vixen that. hs'hn- but: far noun-tttvtnl
illnnia; ta least. tum hospital 33:: hit noun: at to uohxniulaxc tint
ha has 10:: the knapittl. In cltnet, the ytttans 1n oxygenatus his
1: mt»:
when puma. pinata: us than no no:
in that: «algxn‘l retornnttul aunuoxt but it vuhielsu tor in: exproslanl

WM
a: the

1W

muamva mu manta“. 1mm:

‘..

1mm at mu

{aunties in noeoasary to prnvid. can typo a: neural orgnnisttton in!
‘hn nuantonanee of this new synbolie synten the behavior 113.11 a: tin

tOtult a: tin tuturtntton or t numb.» at ttatort u vhtt 1331.! (I) It!
cull-d tn. orgnutuumvnviranmaat—ohﬁurvur euuplnx. wax: tualud0t not
«:1: tbs antral arznnt:at1an. but the ltct $1 tau disability ttucll.
tho putlogt'n untivltion ta b: I'll, tn. tnturpnrooatl tituttton a! $I.
intaxvicv. and the paticnt'a 11!. axpcriauct and parsoaaltty. tar
.i‘nplo. 1! tin interview in warriod out with utcrxli I;to: that. am.
In ch33... 8| lungsmtp. If tho oat-tun! docs not qunctten tho pttlaut
to limit: you to slap. haunt: with, “It!” man 1am my
what marital: ditteront rgnctinun ﬂldﬁr unytal madiuu bocxuuc ox
dittovunl typcu of puricn:lxty Ind uttstndua taunt! incapacity.

�-11canxrol pattantu mitt physlaul disabiltttoﬁ ain'toexskud
with hint: dlncauo. vita quittiunnd unﬁt: smrtni todtun. ‘law «he!
ulturuttana in lttcﬂlﬂﬂ. Tho: «a nut deny thuir tiﬂt’ﬁﬁltt‘i in qadnrw
13¢ ‘tluntaunl itniion nor an thug than luutl‘u diuortcatnttun tar plaeo
or tint. fin! to hau0Vtr. "Iinautcrnwwt" quantinns about illltui it!
an: 0! than ”oblon- ta mu 0! am»:
an. tuphnnlauc. humor. “1“. Ind «lights. I. n.prcriou- ntndy (3) 1t
in; potatud out that vita tun pattcat tuxrodumod nuathar ’Ofiﬂﬂ nttcr
toagtviac tin drug I. it. up: nnuoasartly ruvunltau that had htthgruo
Dana ”ro’wouaud” but yum oitlu clovosntng bin tuclluul 1a a nun

mm

mxulmtm.

”ml“ «mu».

who

um: 91

no

a: a. tuna“
m. m M
he

that in. ion: unployod. :ppaaru to h. thﬁt a! siting tin strong a!
ti. tuvsrnuncntnl attusttun tan or ultcrtna tit unurul orunltluttou in
first-h tit incllrould In! tho tansuilcd an. at tlnpttv. unehnatlli.
la prcvlonn studio. (3) (19). it kiwi itlealnoi its '13::ttotaut a! it. ctphorlu ‘sﬂ ludto bahnrtar tilt II Otttu notod 1%tt
unytnl cudtun. 1% it: pointed out thut tutu hihtvlﬂt «quid not to
intarptotud tiny}: in.Instantaal-phnyiolaui¢nl tart. ﬂint ta ”onrttcll
imprunstau” or as a ”rulounu at anhtbtttOH.” lhthur. tiny It. tynbol;¢
unit: at annptattau an it» unu-nrha1 upturn cougar-b1. to tho ammunitiant ahaaunc in vuriu: zanannuo. on» anuno‘ stat. that tic Gran Ithﬂﬂ
or an. annual. Inn ”than “11 John
putat- lm

mum

hdotnwt, but not

ti. ithctton vial: aﬁhsru do no ant: Its}. undnr
tum ﬁru‘. i‘éiclttuc that t titlur. par It to $011 u

sitar

thn titlioaoo at
got. don: not ruyruntnt *tnhlhtttun” vital 13 “rattan-i? ph1u1olnalaaIXI
by thu'drua. rattantn v.0. ‘nlnd to talk 33km. io¢;unn tn Iﬂlﬁl. tun
patina: alto: uaaroano: hit natal... not 1: a turutl ruxnrcatttl eonttxt
but in u u;ubolt¢ ptttqrs uttltxtns‘trnnstnas doatul. diturtOltattnn and
ittgla¢cnunt ta titties pﬁruon. raw uxtlpln. than nahgd why It can. to
the inupttnl u yuttnnt unciﬁl rcpt}. booaauo "I“: 1011.“ til at»:

tutad manta

no

I

Ina. night titan!

_

,
i

�”'er

«u-

""‘T

“Illluado aahnrotl“ I! h. porntstn in much rtnpouluu. 1‘ may to an
indianttou a! brutn diamana, but t: thy VQI’OII'I as. trniaitlt In!
ungrat‘lly $1 vuiiixn‘ by "ha, ha” tiny £90 annatdnrvd an JONDI. 0i!
Vﬂlhﬂ anarcusod not telling. ahaut tun honyitn1.vhurt in! but tenacity
hat: a puttnnt by votorrtnc ta 1: 3; ”Int: 3311.” in than! attunﬁtani
thy patxtnt x: utilising 1h» man. at th- houyltul at g nynbalia Action
for tho rcyrosoltttanu o! ht: prabltnn.
Thouu.pst1ontn, in thutr rnipoasuu to tho pracn‘uvu I’DOI'~
:0 to rtnoiblo tn; normal group in he». reagents thnu that :sa tho
group with hvaxn dullﬂb.

thiy

416 not dxrnatly dun: tun cssntauno»o¢

problonn an: did tho! show lnattnu pattornu of disortan‘utton. tin
Iyubaliu avionics air. of tin nan. typo atcd hr tho mortal Illu'.

tho: did an. tn... houovdr. t¢ a grants! Court. as ovidsauu‘ Ir it.
1313.: nutter of trnalltat after; in ortcgtatton and ¢strauauu a!
tllnnua. tar: lads: hahnvtar and much not. unriayenntVtaaan Ind.utth~

drnunl. Tics. rusponscs. «ouplcd with chucrvutlan o! thn intatnaactn
to: hohuvtar, nuggtntu that tho total situation cantata. III. I‘lﬂiin
tul Iﬁttﬁrﬂﬂh than 3!. ¢n¢ouaturaa thin tho taat ts “.06 with ’attalsu
in a gunnrtl hospital.

:

�W.
W“.

‘0‘. I“ “it. In!
("My“) mtw)
In“

’o‘o. It... ‘9‘“.
“midi... o:
3.41m
Lunatic
m
1-0.:
3.
Mama.
”max...

mun:

1o

a
0.:
LJ.
I. “mun.LA... an.thoI.L.. tutu-n.
m
an”.
You“
ct
tar
”Aura
man
an:
manna»
W:and um.
LBJ.
him.
its
mt.
m1.
m
11: 3:1th
$11-$28, mu. mud:
3. «man. LA. and an“. 5.:
in swu- Win
A...
J. puma».
(”m1
Mia").
mm
u.

wt»:

a.“
| 9m.

.

max.

W

W“.

a!
3.5. m m. 3.1“:
«man.
1.
1m.
m*. Mind I“ “with” “3 "'9
8. luau“. SJ. «1 an. id“: attun- at atom-mutton
”am. J. mm“. m 6113. m1... 1:
6.

a:

'

‘

”at“
3. arm. a...
I. and um. $3.: I» mm tutu
m.
a!
Egg-mun an erg-nu In“: W.lom1m.m«-u.
‘

g

c

MI... mu. mu... tum. Add mm“ an
mm.
M ammo-9mm“ “uranium 1. m1
autumn
10.
of
and
I m.
on
um
Wu
many-«Mm
mum
3.1.: MW meat“: 1- the u“.
I ”I
Linn.
LIA. not. lam}. ad mun... It: 613-881.. nu.
ﬁnial». Au can» Luann. human. mm c. W,
10. "mun. LA... ma. LL. and
. l»: mu ”no:
3: “cm.
with It“: Mum. 3. It In“ mung.
1.

m

”that:

LMWW
‘r

�Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Volume IV

January, 1955

Number 1

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2414">
                <text>The “Amytal test" in patients with mental illness. Journal of the Hillside Hospital., 4: 3-13, 1955.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2415">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2416">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-15-019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2417">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2418">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Weinstein, Edwin A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2419">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2420">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2421">
                <text>[Preprint] and Reprint. Reprint from Journal of the Hillside Hospital, Volume IV, January, 1955, Number 1.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2422">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2423">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74444">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81005">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87566">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94127">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="244" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="35">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/d4673cc7ac4d3b5481723b3db49559a7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7cd1e7dcb45e0955ceb3d6c8e6eafcd7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100661">
                    <text>Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical
Improvement in Electroshock

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.,

Max

Fink, M.D.

Glen Oaks, N.Y.
and
Edwin A.

Weinstein, M.D.

Bethesda,

Md.

Submitted for publication February 23, 1956.

Hillside Hospital (Drs.

Kahn and

of Research (Dr. Weinstein).

Fink). Walter

Reed Army

Institute

supported in part by the Medical Research and
of the Surgeon General, Department of the
Office
Development Board,
and grant M-927 from the
DA-h9-OO7-MD-376;
No.
under
Contract
Army,
of
the
Mental
National
Health
Institutes of
of
National Institute
Health
Public
Service.
U.S.
Health,
This

investigation

was

�\

theories about the mode of action of electroshock
therapy have been offered, the relationship among neurophysiological
and psychological factors remains poorly understood (1,2). Although
While many

changes in brain function

may be

demonstrated

on

electrical recording,

such evidence of impaired function has not been correlated with the
degree of psychiatric improvement. Similarly, although memory defects

learning ability are common manifestations following the
administration of electrically induced convulsions, their severity is
not an index of therapeutic outcome. It would appear that the results
of ordinary clinical and laboratory procedures and psychological tests
do not furnish adequate criteria for a correlation of the alterations
of behavior with the changes in brain function.
In previous studies (3) it has been suggested that the therapeutic action of electroshock therapy was related to the production
of a milieu of brain dysfunction in which denial of illness (anosognosia) might occur. A concept of anosognosia was advanced which
included not only denial of hemiplegia and blindness but denial of
many other aspects of illness and problems of living. It was indicated that anosognosia was not explicable as a focal deficit but was,
rather, a manifestation of a reorganization of perceptual symbolic
function in which the patient represented his problems in an altered
language pattern. In the verbal sphere these language patterns
included explicit denial, disorientation for place and time, reduplication (reduplicative paramnesia), paraphasia, and confabulation.
The patient's feelings about his illness and incapacities could also
be manifested in nonverbal aspects of behavior, such as selective
and impaired

�-2withdrawal, inattention, and muteness (akinetic mutism), altered
sexual behavior, and euphoric, manic states. The particular form
of symbolic adaptation that was used was
of the premorbid personality.

closely related to features

These changes in behavior were found commonly with

infiltrating

neoplasms, with acute vascular

lesions, particularly when associated
with subarachnoid bleeding, and following lacerating brain injury.
electroencephalographic records showed diffuse slow-wave rhythms,
and it appeared that the lesions affected the diffuse projection
systems rather than any specific discrete projection area. Similar
forms of behavior may appear after the operation of prefrontal
lobotomy and, in more transitory form, after the administration of
electroshock convulsions. When the degree of brain damage was
insufficient to permit the elicitation of explicit denial and disorientation on ordinary clinical examination, these phenomena might
be observed when the patient was interviewed after the intravenous
administration of amobarbital (Amytal) sodium. This observation
furnished the basis for the "Amytal test" for brain damage, in which
the persistence of certain patterns of denial and disorientation are
considered as evidence of impaired function (h,5,6,7).
It was reported that in some patients receiving electroshock
treatment for intractable pain, the amobarbital test, which was
previously negative, became positive after a number of convulsions.
Others received as many as 18 shocks without change in the results
The

of the amobarbital

test. It

was

noted that in patients

who

gained

�-3-

relief

from

their complaints

of pain, the amobarbital

positive, whereas in those patients

tests

became

continued to complain of
pain the amobarbital tests remained negative. The purpose of the
present paper is to determine the relationship between the clinical
response to electroshock treatment and the results of the amobarbital test in patients hospitalized for psychiatric illness.
who

METHOD

patient was given a series of amobarbital tests. In this
test, the patient is asked a standard group of questions pertaining
to orientation and the awareness of illness. The drug is then
administered intravenously in a 0.5% solution at a rate of 0.05 gm.
Each

cc.) per minute until nystagmus, slurred speech, drowsiness, and
errors in counting backward are noted. The same questions are then
repeated. The following changes, when persistent,are called
"positive" and are deemed indicative of cerebral dysfunction.
1. Complete denial of illness2. Denial of major aspects of illness, such as attributing
entry into hospital to a trivial or past illness.
(1

hospital, either its proper name or in terms
of some euphemism, such as "rest home".
h. Displacement of the location of the hospital, such as to
another city3.

Misnaming the

5.

Confabulated journey.
Reduplication of the hospital, such as the patient's stating that he is in another hospital of the same or similar

6.

�name.
7.

Disorientation for time of day with confusion of day and

night.
8.

Gross
him a

9.
The

misidentification of the examiner, such as calling
"lawyer" or an "entertainer".

Disorientation for year.
patient was given his first test prior to treatment and

was

retested at weekly intervals. All patients in the series had negative amobarbital tests prior to the ﬂﬁtiation of therapy. Treat—
ments were administered three times a week, so that the patients
were generally tested after every third treatment. A test was given
two days after a treatment and was continued at weekly intervals

after

the termination of therapy

until the result

had become nega-

tive.
Electroencephalographic records and standard tests of memory
and learning ability were also given, but will not be considered
in detail in this paper.
POPULATION

patients at Hillside HOSpital receiving electroshock with the Reiter Electrostimulator were studied. The patients
were not selected by us but were taken on the basis of consecutive
referrals by the clinical staff. Some patients were necessarily
excluded because their treatment was terminated or interrupted before
they were adequately studied. Another patient was omitted because
he had manifestations of brain disease and a positive amobarbital
Twenty—four

�-5-

test prior to electroconvulsive therapy.

The number of

treatments

varied from 9 to 33. Patients who showed clinical improvement
tended to receive fewer treatments. Some of this variability could
also be ascribed to differences in the inclination of the resident
psychiatrists to use this form of treatment. One patient decided
for himself that he had had enough treatment and eloped. Diagnostically, the patients consisted of lh with depressive reactions, 9 with
schizophrenia, and l with manic reaction. There were 15 women and
9 men,

and the ages ranged from 2h to 68, with a median of h?

years.

Evaluation of Response to Electroshock Therapy: All patients
were observed for at least eight weeks after completion of treatment. Determination of the patient's response to electroshock was
made on the basis of the resident psychiatrist's impression, staff
opinion, the nurses' notes, and the clinical evaluation of one of
us (M. F.), who supervised the treatments but was not aware of the
amobarbital test results. On this basis the patients were divided

into three groups.
cases in this group were regarded
as showing recovery or marked improvement. These patients no longer
showed the symptoms which brought them into the hospital: their
doctors felt they were better, and the nurses noted them as being
able to sleep without medication, eating better, getting along with
the other patients, and participating in hospital activities.
A.

Markedly Improved:

The 11

Moderately Improved: The six patients in this group showed
some improvement but continued to manifest indﬂations of mental
B.

�-5-

illness.

patients typically showed symptomatic relief; ELEL’
acute depressive features might be gone, but the dramatic change, so
evident in the first group, was not apparent. Each patient continThese

noticeable disturbance, such as obsessional thinking,
paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
ued to show some
C.

seven

Minimally Improved or Unimproved:

patients in

whom

change was not

showed only equivocal or

In

this group

was

clearly noticeable or

transient improvement.

placed

who

Some showed

fluctu-

ations in behavior, at times appearing somewhat improved. But the
change was not sustained, so that by the end of treatment they
appeared much as they did before.
We are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement.
Others may have differed in the estimates of changes in these
patients. In any case, by using this threefold classification, the
differences between the first and the third group will be distinct.
OBSERVATIONS

Distribution of Positive Reactions: The number of amobarbital tests given to each patient during the course of electroshock
A.

to 13, depending on how long treatment was maintained.
In Table l the data are shown for the number of tests given during
treatment and the number and percentage positive for all the patients

ranged from

3

in each group. The markedly improved patients showed many more
positive reactions than the unimproved group, with the moderately
improved patients between these groups. Every markedly improved
patient had at least one positive amobarbital reaction during

�-7the other hand, one of the moderately improved
patients and five of the unimproved patients never showed a positive
result. A comparison of the results in each group, using the x2
test, is statistically significant at better than the 1% level of

treatment.

0n

confidence.
B.

Positive Reactions at

Each Stage of Treatment:

In the

Figure the groups are compared for the percentage of patients in
each group who had positive results at each stage of treatment.
Almost half the markedly improved patients had positive reac-

tions after only three treatments, and all had positive reactions
after seven to nine treatments. In the unimproved cases, on the
other hand, the number of positive reactions was small and there
was no consistent increase during the course of treatment. Again,
the moderately improved group tends to fall between the other two.
Fig:

Percentage of positive amobarbital test
reactions occurring in each group at
different stages of treatment.

patients received more than 15 treatments, the
data are not presented beyond this point because the number in each
Although some

group became too small for purposes of comparison. Four of the
unimproved patients received more than 20 treatments, with consis-

tently negative amobarbital test results. One of the moderately
improved patients received over 30 treatments, with only an
occasionally positive reaction.

�-8-

variations in
the persistence of positive reactions from week to week. With at
least two consecutive positives as the criterion of persistence,
0.

Duration of Positive Reactions:

There were

nine of the markedly improved, two of the moderately improved, and
only one of the unimproved group showed persistent positives. After
the termination of treatment all patients but one had negative
amobarbital reactions nine days after the last convulsion. The
remaining patient developed a negative test during the second week

after treatment.
Factor of Age: Since the patients in the markedly improved
group tended to be older persons suffering from depressive reactions,
it is conceivable that the difference in amobarbital test results
D.

related solely to age and only coincidentally to clinical
improvement. Underlying this is the assumption that the older
person is more likely to show signs of altered brain function when
given electroshock. In Table 2 the mean age for each group is shown.
It is apparent that the first two groups were older than the

may

be

patients. Yet, while the mean age of the moderately
patients is slightly higher than that of the markedly
group, these patients still had significantly fewer positive

unimproved
improved
improved

reactions.
the number of positive reactions during treatment is
for each group when the analysis is limited to patients more

In Table
shown

3

years of age. In this Table the relationship of positive
reactions in the different groups remains unchanged from that when
than

hO

�-9the groups are considered as a whole.
OTHER

ASPECTS OF BEHAVIOR

Apart from explicit denial of illness and disorientation, there
were changes in behavior that occurred both under the influence of
the drug and clinically during the course of treatment in signifi—

cantly progressive fashion in those patients who improved. These
aspects may be divided into verbal and nonverbal communication.
A.
Changes in Verbal Language: These changes consisted of
denial expressed in evasion, in negative expressions, and in the
use of a syntactical pattern involving the third and second persons.

patients gave such answers as "It's
hard to say", or "I forgot", or "I don't know; I've been waiting
for the doctors to tell me." The change in syntactical pattern is

When

asked about

illustrated

their

symptoms,

"It's

they call a depression",
or "I'm afraid somebody will get hurt", or answering the question
"What is your main trouble?" with "What is your main trouble?"
by such remarks as

what

patients would talk of a relative who was sick.
In patients who improved there was a notable development of such
patterns in a nondrug interview. One such patient, for example when
asked prior to the start of treatment what his main trouble was,
said, "I’m depressed." After two treatments he answered the question with "I don't get along well with my mother-in-law." After
five treatments he said, "I don't get what you mean"; after eight,
"I get sick; that's all I know." After 10 treatments he said, "Right
now, it's that I don’t see my wife," and after 11 treatments he said,
Sometimes

�-10"In what way do you mean?" and "I

don't

know how

to explain

it."

termination of treatment, his main trouble was given as "I
want to get home", followed by an account of how "good" his wife
At the

was.

the other hand, the increased use
of these language patterns did not occur. They were not present in
In the unimproved group,

some and were

on

minimally or inconsistently noted in others.

In some

patients there were actually fewer such language
patterns under the effects of the drug than there had been in the
of the unimproved

preamobarbital interview.
B.

Changes in Nonverbal Behavior:

reactions occurred
frequently in the markedly

Euphoric

in both clinical and drug interviews most
improved group, less often in the moderately improved group, and
least often in the group which were considered unimproved. In the

patient classed as manic, euphoric behavior

present
in his clinical behavior and was not changed by amobarbital.
Changes in sexual behavior appeared during the amobarbital
interviews of four of the markedly improved patients but in only
one patient in each of the other categories. This took the form of
trying to hug or caress the examiner, making remarks with sexual
content, or engaging in masturbatory activity. A patient in the
unimproved group showed this behavior both during pre-drug interviews and under the influence of amobarbital.
unimproved

Withdrawal or
markedly improved

"selective inattention"

was

was shown by

patients, particularly during the

9

of the

ll

drug phase of the

�amobarbital interview. This behavior consisted of failure to answer
the questions about illness and hospitalization or responding in
dysarthric and cryptic fashion. This reaction under the drug occur—
red only once in each of the other groups. It was of interest that
two

patients in the unimproved category who appeared withdrawn before

the test became more responsive under the influence of the drug.
COMMENT

results of the amobarbital tests in these patients indicate
that there is a relation between clinical improvement and the production of brain damage or an altered state of brain function as
determined by this particular method of examination. In patients
The

who

improve, the amobarbital

test

becomes

consistently positive

early in the course of treatment. In moderately improved or unimproved patients there are fewer positive reactions and their frequency does not increase with more treatments. With other methods
of evaluating brain function such close correlation was not present,

all patients

abnormalities in the electroencephalographic
record and impaired learning was found as frequently in patients
who improved as in those who do not. The significance of this
relationship may be more clearly appreciated by a consideration of
the changes in symbolic function that occur in states of altered
brain function.
It has been useful in studying the behavior of patients with
alterations in brain function to distinguish between defects in the
as

showed

formation of symbol patterns and changes of language patterns which

�-12-

interaction in the environment. In
the first category may be included many types of memory defects,
dyscalculia, topographical disorientation, and aphasia. A patient
with such a memory defect cannot select elements of experience,
classify them into significant units, and arrange them into a temporal pattern. These defects are observed with diffuse cortical
lesions and probably occur universally after shock treatments in
transient fashion. They are, however, related very remotely, if at
all, to therapeutic outcome. Alterations in the mode of interaction
in the environment are exemplified in the various patterns of disorientation and denial and in the amnesias that are noted with
lesions of the diffuse projection systems, in chronic barbiturate
intoxication, and following electroshock convulsions. Here there
is no defect in memory, awareness, or perception as such, but the
patient selects or rejects certain aspects of the environment for
the expression of his own motivations. In disorientation for place,
for example, the misnaming and mislocating of the hospital serve as
symbolic representations of the patient's feelings about his incapindicate

abilities

shift in the

a

and problems

be well and go home.

mode of

as the manifestation of his need to
not that the patient is unaware of his

-- often

It is

is in an absolute sense. He
of the hospital and expresses "aware-

problems and does not know where he
commonly "remembers"

ness" of his
unawareness

the name

difficulties in other contexts of language. The
is, rather, of the far greater degree to which he is

expressing his

own

motivations in his perception of the temporal,

�-13-

aspects of the environment.
In considering what constitutes therapeutic improvement, it is
evident that the evaluation that is commonly made by a hospital

spatial, personal,

and somatic

the particular types of symbolic
adaptation and defensive operations that are used. If the patient
denies that he has any problems or that he is troubled by them, or
if he cannot recall any, he is rated as improved. Such patients
characteristically appear affable and uncomplaining, their manner
reinforced by cliches and banalities, themselves adaptive forms of

staff

large part

depends in

on

that general
memory impairment does not persist after electroshock but that there
is a selective "forgetting" of traumatic material in the patient's
life. This does not mean that he has developed a better understand—
ing of his interpersonal relationships or has acquired "insight“.
The observation is also significant in explaining why, although
electroshock may have a short-term beneficial effect, evaluation of
long-term results shows little difference between treated and untreated cases. Also, the fact that therapeutic improvement did not
result in patients with negative amobarbital tests suggests that
methods of administering electroshock by minimally affecting brain
function, such as a unilateral seizure, will not prove generally
efficacious. From the immediately practical standpoint, the amobarbital test given after the third or fourth treatment may be of
language.

Many

studies (8,9,10,11,12) have

shown

prognostic value.
The

amobarbital

test is

not in

itself

a

direct index of brain

�-114-

in that it measures some particular modality of dysfunction
or brings out a specific defect. Rather, under the conditions in
which it is given, one deduces impaired neural function by reason
of the change in the organization or pattern of language in which
the patient expresses himself. A positive result requires not only
damage

certain degree and type of impairment of brain function exist
but that the patient employ verbal denial and disorientation as
adaptive mechanisms. It would be expected that among patients with
equivalent degrees of brain damage the highest incidence of positive
that

a

amobarbital tests would occur among those who characteristically use
denial as an adaptive mechanism in stress.
In relating these findings to the mode of action of electroshock and other somatic therapies, several considerations seem of
importance. There is a combination of an added stress and a change
in brain function. The milieu of brain function determines the

pattern or organization of the adaptive behavior which can be most
clearly formulated in terms of language. These include not only
verbal patterns of denial and disorientation, elicited with the aid
of the drug, but changes in syntactical patterns indicative of an
altered relationship of the self in the environment. There were
also indications that in the improved patients there were more

all

types of symbolic adaptation, nonverbal as well as
verbal. Thus, a patient who appeared withdrawn both in the predrug
and in the drug interview had a poorer prognosis than the patient
The
who became withdrawn only under the effects of the drug.
changes in

�-15-

patient

who showed

altered sexual behavior under the effects of the

drug had also exhibited

this behavior during the clinical question-

ing as well and did not improve with treatment, whereas the four
patients manifesting sexual behavior only under effects of the drug
did improve. It is likely that the faculty of changing symbolic

patterns regardless of content is

a

factor in therapeutic improve-

ment.
SUMMARY

patients referred consecutively for electroshock
treatment were given amobarbital (Amytal) tests before and at
regular intervals during and following the course of treatment.
There was a close relationship between the short-term response
Twenty-four

to treatment and the results of the amobarbital

tests.

The much

patients showed early, persistent, and increasingly positive reactions during the course of treatment. Unimproved patients
showed no positive reactions, or showed them infrequently and inconsistently. An intermediate group, who showed moderate clinical
improvement, showed more positive reactions than the unimproved
group but fell far short of the much improved group in the incidence
of positive reactions.
Changes in language and nonverbal forms of behavior related to
denial were most consistent and pronounced in the improved group,
improved

interviews not employing drugs.
These observations indicate that clinical improvement in elec—
troshock requires the creation of conditions of altered brain function in which new patterns of symbolic adaptation can be maintained.
even in

�TABLE 1

Distribution of Positive Amobarbital Tests
During Treatment

No. of

Tests

Given During

Markedly improved

Moderately improved
Unimproved

(7)

(11)
(6)

No.

%

Treatment

Positive

Positive

50

38

76

39

15

38

hS

6

13

�TABLE 2

Relationship of Clinical Improvement
To Age

Mean

Agez Yr.

Markedly improved

Moderately improved
Unimproved

(7)

(11)
(6)

h7.6h
50.00
35.29

�TABLE 3

Distribution of Positive Amobarbital Tests
in Patients More Than ho Years of Age

No. of

Tests

Given During

Markedly improved
Moderately improved
Unimproved

(3)

(10)
(5)

No.

%

Treatment

Positive

Positive

h6

35

76

3h

15

hS

17

�REFERENCES

1.

Gordon, H.L.:

Fifty

Shock Therapy Theories, Mil. Surgeon,

192: 397, 19h8.
Kalinowsky, L.B., and Koch, P.H.: Shock Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other Somatic Treatment in Psychiatry, Ed. 2, New York,
Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952.
2.

Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic
and Physiological Aspects, Springfield, I11., Charles C. Thomas,
3.

Publisher, 1955.
Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., Sugarman, L.A. and Linn, L.:
Diagnostic Use of Amobarbital Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am.
h.

J.

Psychiat., 112: 889-89u, 1953.
Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Malitz, 5.: Serial Administration of "Amytal Test" for Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and
Prognostic Value, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 11: 217-226,
S.

195k.

Weinstein, E.A. and Malitz, 3.: Changes in Symbolic Ex—
pression with Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Sodium"), Am. J. Psychiat.,
6.

lll=

198-206, 195h.
7.

Kahn,

R.L., Fink,

M.

and Weinstein, E.A.:

The "Amytal

Test"

in Patients with Mental Illness, J. Hillside Hosp., Q: 3-13, 1955.
8. Carter, J.T.: Type of Personal Life Memories Forgotten
Following Electra-Convulsive Therapy, Am. Psychologist, g: 330, 1953.
9. Janis, I.L.: Psychologic Effects of Electric Convulsive
Treatments: I. Post-Treatment Amnesias, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis., 111:
359, 1950.

�-210.

Korngold, M.:

An

Investigation of

Some

Psychological

Effects of Electric Shock Treatment, Am. Psychol., g: 381-382, 1953.
11. Teicher, A.: The Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy on
the Visual Reactions of Schizophrenic Patients,

Am.

Pszchol.,

hhS, 1953.

12.

Person,

Alexander, L.:
Am.

J. Psychiat.,

Effect of Electroshock
109: 696-698, 1953.

on a "Normal"

Q:

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
July 1956, Vol. 76, pp. 23—29
Copyright 1956, by American, Medical Association

lee/whorl

.725!
to
o/ﬂmoéaréita/

C/inica/

E/ectrodhocé
jm/orouement in
ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.
MAX FlNK. M.D.. Glen Oaks. N. Y.

and
EDWIN A. WEINSTEIN. M.D.. Bethesda. Md.
lllllllllll|l||[|[|IllllllllllIlllllllllllllll|IIIlIllIlllllllIlllIll|||l||llIll||l|lllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllU

While many theories about the mode of
action of electroshock therapy have been
offered, the relationship among neurophy—
siological and psychological factors remains
poorly understood.* Although changes in
brain function may be demonstrated on electrical recording, such evidence of impaired
function has not been correlated with the
degree of psychiatric improvement. Similarly, although memory defects and impaired
learning ability are common manifestations
following the administration of electrically
induced convulsions, their severity is not an
index of therapeutic outcome. It would apclinical
of
results
the
that
ordinary
pear
and laboratory procedures and psychological tests do not furnish adequate criteria
for a correlation of the alterations of be—
havior with the changes in brain function.
3
it has been suggested
studies
In previous
that the therapeutic action of electroshock
therapy was related to the production of a
milieu of brain dysfunction in which denial
of illness (anosognosia) might occur. A
concept of anosognosia was advanced which
included not only denial of hemiplegia and
Submitted for publication Feb. 23, 1956.

Hillside Hospital (Drs. Kahn and Fink).
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Dr.
Weinstein).
This investigation was supported in part by the

Medical Research and Development Board, Ofﬁce
of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army,
under Contract No. DA—49—007—MD—376; and grant
M-927 from the National Institute of Mental
Health of the National Institutes of Healthy U. S.
Public Health Service.
*

References 1-2.

blindness but denial of many other aspects
of illness and problems of living. It was
indicated that anosognosia was not explicable as a focal deﬁcit but was, rather, a
manifestation of a reorganization of perceptual symbolic function in which the patient
represented his problems in an altered lan—
guage pattern. In the verbal sphere these
language patterns included explicit denial,
disorientation for place and time, reduplica—
tion (reduplicative paramnesia), paraphasia,
and confabulation. The patient’s feelings
about his illness and incapacities could also
be manifested in nonverbal aspects of behavior, such as selective withdrawal, inat—
tention, and muteness (akinetic mutism).
altered sexual behavior, and euphoric, manic
states. The particular form of symbolic
adaptation that was used was closely related
to features of the premorbid personality.
These changes in behavior were found
commonly with inﬁltrating neoplasms, with
acute vascular lesions, particularly when
associated with subarachnoid bleeding, and
following lacerating brain injury. The elec—
troencephalographic records showed diffuse
slow—wave rhythms, and it appeared that
the lesions affected the diffuse projection
systems rather than any speciﬁc discrete
projection area. Similar forms of behavior
may appear after the operation of prefrontal
lobotomy and, in more transitory form, after
the administration of electroshock convul—
sions. When the degree of brain damage
was insufﬁcient to permit the elicitation of
explicit denial and disorientation on ordi—
nary clinical examination, these phenomena
might be observed when the patient was in—
terviewed after the intravenous administra—
tion of amobarbital (Amytal) sodium. This

�observation furnished the basis for the
“Amytal test” for brain damage, in which
the persistence of certain patterns of denial
and disorientation are considered as evi—
dence of impaired function.T
It was reported that in some patients
receiving electroshock treatment for intractable pain, the amobarbital test, which was
previously negative, became positive after
a number of convulsions. Others received
as many as 18 shocks without change in the
results of the amobarbital test. It was noted
that in patients who gained relief from
their complaints of pain, the amobarbital
tests became positive, whereas in those pa—
tients who continued to complain of pain
the amobarbital tests remained negative. The
purpose of the present paper is to determine
the relationship between the clinical response to electroshock treatment and the
results of the amobarbital test in patients
hospitalized for psychiatric illness.

Method
Each patient was given a series of amobarbital
tests. In this test, the patient is asked a standard
group of questions pertaining to orientation and
the awareness of illness. The drug is then administered intravenously in a 0.5% solution at a
rate of 0.05 gm. (1 cc.) per minute until nystagmus, slurred speech, drowsiness, and errors in
counting backward are noted. The same questions
are then repeated. The following changes, when
persistent, are called “positive” and are deemed
indicative of cerebral dysfunction.
1. Complete denial of illness
2. Denial of major aspects of illness, such as
attributing entry into hospital to a trivial or
past illness
3. Misnaming the hospital, either its proper name
or in terms of some euphemism, such as “rest
home”
4. Displacement of the location of the hospital.
such as to another city
5-"

6.

7.

8.
9.
1'

Confabulated journey
Reduplication of the hospital, such as the
patient’s stating that he is in another hospital
of the same or similar name
Disorientation for time of day with confusion
of day and night
Gross misidentiﬁcation of the examiner, such
as calling him a “lawyer” or an “entertainer”
Disorientation for year

References 4-7.

The patient was given his ﬁrst test prior to
treatment and was retested at weekly intervals.
All patients in the series had negative amobarbital
tests prior to the initiation of therapy. Treatments
were administered three times a week, so that the
patients were generally tested after every third
treatment. A test was given two days after a
treatment and was continued at weekly in—
tervals after the termination of therapy until the
result had become negative.
Electroencephalographic records and standard
tests of memory and learning ability were also
given, but will not be considered in detail in this
paper.

Population
T wenty-four patients at Hillside Hospital receiving electroshock with the Reiter Electrostimulator were studied. The patients were not selected
by us but were taken on the basis of consecutive
referrals by the clinical staff. Some patients were
necessarily excluded because their treatment was
terminated or interrupted before they were ade—
quately studied. Another patient was omitted because he had manifestations of brain disease and
a positive amobarbital test prior to electroconvulsive
therapy. The number of treatments varied from 9
to 33. Patients who showed clinical improvement
tended to receive fewer treatments. Some of this
variability could also be ascribed to differences in
the inclination of the resident psychiatrists to use
this form of treatment. One patient decided for
himself that he had had enough treatment and
eloped.
Diagnostically, the patients consisted
of 14 with depressive reactions, 9 with schizophrenia, and l with a manic reaction. There were
15 women and 9 men, and the ages ranged from
24 to 68, with a median of 47 years.
Evaluation of Response to Electroshock Therapy.
——All patients were observed for at least eight
weeks after completion of treatment. Determina—
tion of the patient’s response to electroshock was
made on the basis of the resident psychiatrist’s im—
pression, staff opinion, the nurses’ notes, and the
clinical evaluation of one of us (M. F.), who
supervised the treatments but was not aware of
the amobarbital test results. On this basis the
patients were divided into three groups.
A. Markedly Improved: The 11 cases in this
group were regarded as showing recovery or
marked improvement. These patients no longer
showed the symptoms which brought them into
the hospital; their doctors felt they were better,
and the nurses noted them as being able to sleep
Without medication, eating better, getting along
with the other patients, and participating in hospital activities.
B. Moderately Improved: The six patients in
this group showed some improvement but con~

�tinued to manifest indications of mental illness.
These patients typically showed symptomatic relief; i.e., acute depressive features might be gone,
but the dramatic change, so evident in the ﬁrst
group, was not apparent. Each patient continued
to show some noticeable disturbance, such as ob—
sessional thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic
preoccupation.
C. Minimally Improved or Unimproved: In this
group was placed seven patients in whom change
was not clearly noticeable or who showed only
equivocal or transient improvement. Some showed
ﬂuctuations in behavior, at times appearing some—
what improved. But the change was not sustained,
so that by the end of treatment they appeared
much as they did before.
\Ve are aware of the difﬁculties in evaluating
improvement. Others may have differed in the
estimates of changes in these patients. In any
case, by using this threefold classiﬁcation, the
differences between the ﬁrst and the third group
will be distinct.

TABLE

Markedly improved (11)-__
Moderately improved (6)-Unimproved (7)____________

Treatment
50
39
45

Amobarbital

No.
%
Positive Positive
38

15.93
6

.4,

76
38
13

treatments, and all had positive reactions
after seven to nine treatments. In the unim-proved cases, on the other hand, the number
of positive reactions was small and there
was no consistent increase during the course
of treatment. Again, the moderately improved group tends to fall between the
other two.
IOO

90
80

Observations

._

MUCH IMPROVEDUI)

----

UNIMPROVEDU)

.\/

'-—MOD.IMPROVED(6)

70
AMYTAL

A. Distribution of Positive Reactions.—

group, with the moderately improved pa—
tients between these groups. Every
markedly improved patient had at least
one positive amobarbital reaction during
treatment. On the other hand, one of the
moderately improved patients and ﬁve
of the unimproved patients never showed
a positive result. A comparison of the
results in each group, using the X2 test,
is statistically signiﬁcant at better than the
1% level of conﬁdence.
B. Positive Reactions at Each Stage of
Treatment—In the Figure the groups are
compared for the percentage of patients in
each group who had positive results at each
stage of treatment.
Almost half the markedly improved pa—
tients had positive reactions after only three

Tests During Treatment
No. of Tests
Given During

REACTIONS

The number of amobarbital tests given to
each patient during the course of electroshock range-d from 3 to 13, depending on
how long treatment was maintained. In
Table 1 the data are shown for the number
of tests given during treatment and the
number and percentage positive for all the
patients in each group. The markedly im—
proved patients showed many more positive reactions than the unimproved

of Positive

l.——Distribution

60
50

POSITIVE

4O
3O

20
PERCENTAGE

5
4-6
NUM BER

7-9

lO-IZ

I3-I5

0F TREATMENTS

Percentage of positive amobarbital test reactions
occurring in each group at different stages of treat—

ment.

Although some patients received more
than 15 treatments, the data are not pre—
sented beyond this point because the number
in each group became too small for purposes
of comparison. Four of the unimproved pa—
tients received more than 20 treatments,
with consistently negative amobarbital test
results. One of the moderately improved
patients received over 30 treatments, with
only an occasionally positive reaction.
C. Duration of Positive Reactions.—
There were variations in the persistence of
positive reactiOns from week to week. With
at least two consecutive positives as the
criterion of persistence, nine of the mark—
edly improved, two of the moderately im—
proved, and only one of the unimproved
group showed persistent positives. After

�the termination of treatment all patients but
one had negative amobarbital reactions nine
days after the last convulsion. The remaining patient developed a negative test during
the second week after treatment.
D. Factor of Age—Since the patients
in the markedly improved group tended
to be older persons suffering from depres—
sive reactions, it is conceivable that the
difference in amobarbital test results may
be related solely to age and only coincidentally to clinical improvement. Underlying
this is the assumption that the older person
is more likely to show signs of altered brain
function when given electroshock. In Table
2 the mean age for each group is shown.
TABLE 2.——Relationship of Clinical Improvemen

To Age

Markedly improved (11)_______-____-___-___________
Moderately improved (6) ___________________________
Unimproved (7) ____________________________________

Mean
Age, Yr.
47.64

gggg

it is apparent that the ﬁrst two groups
were older than the unimproved patients.
Yet, while the mean age of the moderately
improved patients is slightly higher than
that of the markedly improved group, these
patients still had signiﬁcantly fewer positive
reactions.
In Table 3 the number of positive re—
actions during treatment is shown for each
is
limited to pa—
when
the
analysis
group
tients more than 40 years of age. In this
Table the relationship of positive reactions
in the different groups remains unchanged
from that when the groups are considered
as a whole.

Other Aspects of Behavior
Apart from explicit denial of illness and
disorientation, there were changes in be—
havior that occurred both under the in-ﬂuence of the drug and clinically during the
course of treatment in signiﬁcantly progres—
sive fashion in those patients who improved.
These aspects may be divided into verbal
and nonverbal communication.

A. Changes in Verbal Language—These
changes consisted of denial expressed in
evasion, in negative expressions, and in

the use of a syntactical pattern involving
the third and second persons. When asked
about their symptoms, patients gave such
answers as “It’s hard to say,” or “I forgot,”
or “I don’t know; I’ve been waiting for the
doctors to tell me.” The change in syntactical pattern is illustrated by such remarks
Amobarbital
Tests in Patients More Than 40 Years of Age

TABLE

3.——Distribution of Positive

No. of Tests
Given During

Markedly improved (10)--Moderately improved (5)-Unimproved (3) ____________
_

Treatment
46
34
17

N0.
%
Positive Positive
35

15

0

76
45
0

as “It’s what they call a depression,” or “I’m
afraid somebody will get hurt,” or answering
the question “What is your main trouble P"
with “What is your main trouble?” Sometimes patients would talk of a relative who
was sick.
In patients who improved there was a
notable development of such patterns in a
nondrug interview. One such patient, for
example, when asked prior to the start of
treatment what his main trouble was, said,
“I’m depressed.” After two treatments he
answered the question with “I don’t get
along well with my mother-in—law.” After
ﬁve treatments he said, “I don’t get what
you mean": after eight, “I get sick; that’s
all I know.” After 10 treatments he said,
“Right now, it’s that I don’t see my Wife,”
and after 11 treatments he said, “In what
way do you mean?” and “I don’t know
how to explain it.” At the termination of
treatment, his main trouble was given as
“I want to get home,” followed by an account of how “good” his wife was.
In the unimproved group, on the other
hand, the increased use of these language
patterns did not occur. They were not
present in some and were minimally or
inconsistently noted in others. In some of
the unimproved patients there were actually
fewer such language patterns under the

�i

L’

effects of the drug than there had been in
the preamobarbital interview.
B. Changes in Nonverbal Behavior.—
Euphoric reactions occurred in both

sistently positive early in the course of
treatment. In moderately improved or
unimproved patients there are fewer positive reactions and their frequency does
clinical and drug interviews most fre— not increase with more treatments. With
quently in the markedly improved other methods of evaluating brain func—
group, less often in the moderately im— tion such close correlation was not presproved group, and least often in the ent, as all patients showed abnormalities
group which were considered unim— in the e1ectroencephalographic record and
proved. In the unimproved patient impaired learning was found as fre—
classed as manic, euphoric behavior was quently in patients who improved as in
present in his clinical behavior and was those who do not. The signiﬁcance of
this relationship may be more clearly
not changed by amobarbital.
Changes in sexual behavior appeared appreciated by a consideration of the
during the amobarbital interviews of four changes in symbolic function that occur
of the markedly improved patients but in states of altered brain function.
in only one patient in each of the other
It has been useful in studying the becategories. This took the form of try— havior of patients with alterations in
ing to hug or caress the examiner. mak— brain function to distinguish between
ing remarks with sexual content, or en— defects in the formation of symbol pat—
gaging in masturbatory activity. A terns and changes of language patterns
patient in the unimproved group showed which indicate a shift in the mode of
this behavior both during pre—drug inter- interaction in the
environment. In the
views and under the inﬂuence of amobar— ﬁrst
be included many
category
may
bital.
types of memory defects, dyscalculia,
Withdrawal or “selective inattention” topographical disorientation, and aphasia.
was shown by 9‘ of the 11 markedly im; A patient with such a
defect
memory
proved patients. particularly during the cannot select elements of
experience,
drug phase of the amobarbital interview. classify them into
and
signiﬁcant
units,
This behavior consisted of failure to an—
them
into
a
temporal
arrange
pattern.
hos—
the
about
illness and
questions
swer
These defects are observed with diffuse
pitalization or responding in dysarthric cortical lesions and
uni—
probably
occur
and cryptic fashion. This reaction under
versally after shock treatments in tran—
the drug occurred only once in each of
sient fashion. They are, however, related
the other groups. It was of interest that
if at all, to therapeutic
remotely,
very
two patients in the unimproved category
in the mode of inAlterations
outcome.
who appeared withdrawn before the test
teraction in the environment

became more responsive under
ﬂuence of the drug.

the in-

Comment
The results of the amobarbital tests in
these patients indicate that there is a
relation between clinical improvement
and the production of brain damage or
an altered state of brain function as de—
termined by this particular method of
examination. In patients who improve,
the amobarbital test becomes con—

are exempliﬁed in the various patterns of disorientation and denial and in the amnesias
that are noted with lesions of the diffuse
projection systems, in chronic barbiturate
intoxication, and following electroshock
convulsions. Here there is no defect in
memory, awareness, or perception as
such, but the patient selects or rejects
certain aspects of the environment for
the expression of his own motivations.
ln disorientation for place, for example,
the misnaming and mislocating of the

�hospital serve as, symbolic representa—
tions of the patient’s feelings about his
incapabilities and problems—often as the
manifestation of his need to be well and
go home. It is not that the patient is
unaware of his problems and does not
know where he is in an absolute sense.
He commonly “remembers” the name of
the hospital and expresses “awareness”
of his difﬁculties in other contexts of
language. The unawareness is, rather, of
the far greater degree to which he is
expressing his own motivations in his
perception of the temporal. spatial, personal, and somatic aspects of the en—
Vironment.
In considering what constitutes thera—
peutic improvement, it is evident that
the evaluation that is commonly made
by a hospital staff depends in large part
on the particular types of symbolic
adaptation and defensive operations that
are used. If the patient denies that he
has any problems or that he is troubled
by them, or if he cannot recall any, he
is rated as improved. Such patients char—
acteristically appear affable and uncom—
plaining, their manner reinforced by
clichés and banalities, themselves adap—
tive forms of language. Many studies:
have shown that general memory impairment does not persist after electroshock
but that there is a selective “forgetting”
of traumatic material in the patient’s
life. This does not mean that he has
developed a better understanding of his
interpersonal relationships or has ac—
quired “insight.” The observation is also
signiﬁcant in explaining why, although

electroshock may have a short—term bene—
ﬁcial effect, evaluation of long—term results shows little difference between
treated and untreated cases. Also, the
fact that therapeutic improvement did
not result in patients with negative

amobarbital tests suggests that methods
of administering electroshock by minimally affecting brain function, Such as

i References

8-12.

a unilateral seizure, will not prove gen—
erally efﬁcacious. From the immediately

practical standpoint, the amobarbital
test given after the third or fourth treat—
ment may be of prognostic value.
The amobarbital test is not in itself a
direct index of brain damage in that it
measures some particular modality of
dysfunction or brings out a speciﬁc defect. Rather, under the conditions in
which it is given, one deduces impaired
neural function by reason of the change
in the organization or pattern of language in which the patient expresses
himself. A positive result requires not
only that a certain degree and type of
impairment of brain function exist but
that the patient employ verbal denial and
disorientation as adaptive mechanisms.
It would be expected that among patients with equivalent degrees of brain
damage the highest incidence of positive
amobarbital tests would occur among
those who characteristically use denial
as an adaptive mechanism in stress.
In relating these ﬁndings to the mode

of action of electroshock and other somatic
therapies, several considerations seem of
importance. There is a combination of an
added stress and a change in brain function. The milieu of brain function determines the pattern or organization of the
adaptive behavior which can be most clearly
formulated in terms of language. These include not only verbal patterns of denial and
disorientation, elicited with the aid of the
drug, but changes in syntactical patterns indicative of an altered relationship of the
self in the environment. There were also
indications that in the improved patients
there were more changes in all types of
symbolic adaptation, nonverbal as well
as verbal. Thus, a patient who appeared
withdrawn both in the predrug and in
the drug interview had a poorer prog—
nosis than the patient who became withdrawn only under the effects of the drug.
The patient who showed altered sexual
behavior under the effects of the drug
had also exhibited this behavior during

�the clinical questioning as well and did not
improve with treatment, whereas the four
patients manifesting sexual behavior only
under effects of the drug did improve. It
is likely that the faculty of changing sym—
bolic patterns regardless of content is a factor in therapeutic improvement.

REFERENCES
Gordon, H. L.: Fifty Shock Therapy
ories, Mil. Surgeon 103 2397, 1948.
1.

The—

2.

Kalinowsky, L. B., and Hoch, P. H.: Shock
Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other Somatic
Treatment in Psychiatry, Ed. 2, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952.

Weinstein, E. A., and Kahn, R. L.: Denial
of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects,
Springﬁeld, Ill, Charles C Thomas, Publisher,
3.

Summary
Twenty—four patients referred consecu—
tively for electroshock treatment were
given amobarbital (Amytal) tests before
and at regular intervals during and fol—
lowing the course of treatment.
There was a close relationship between
the short—term response to treatment
and the results of the amobarbital tests.
The much improved patients showed
early, persistent, and increasingly positive reactions during the course of treat—
ment. Unimproved patients showed no
positive reactions, or showed them in—
frequently and inconsistently. An inter—
mediate group, who showed moderate
clinical improvement, showed more posi—
tive reactions than the unimproved group
but fell far short of the much improved
group in the incidence of positive re—
actions.
Changes in language and nonverbal
forms of behavior related to denial were
most consistent and pronounced in the
improved group, even in interviews not
employing drugs.

These observations indicate that clinical
improvement in electroshock requires
the creation of conditions of altered brain
function in which new patterns of
symbolic adaptation can be maintained.

1955.

Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L.; Sugarman,
L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic Use of Amobarbi—
tal Sodium in Organic Brain Disease, Am. J.
Psychiat. 112:889-894, 1953.
4.

Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L., and Malitz,
5.: Serial Administration of “Amytal Test” for
Brain Disease: Its Diagnostic and Prognostic
Value, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 71 1217—
5.

226, 1954.

\Neinstein, E. A., and Malitz, 8.: Changes
in Symbolic Expression with Amobarbital Sodium
(“Amytal Sodium”), Am. J. Psychiat. 111:198-206,
6.

1954.

Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
The “Amytal Test” in Patients with Mental Ill—
ness, J. Hillside Hosp. 4:3-13, 1955.
7.

Carter, J. T.: Type of Personal Life Memo«
ries Forgotten Following Electro—Convulsive
Therapy. Am. Psychologist 8 :330, 1953.
8.

Janis, I. L.: Psychologic Effects of Electric
Convulsive Treatments: I. Post—Treatment Am—
nesias, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 111:359, 1950.
9.

Korngold, M.: An Investigation of Some
Psychological Effects of Electric Shock Treat—
ment, Am. Psychol. 8:381—382, 1953.
10.

Teicher, A.: The Effect of Electroconvulsive
Therapy on the Visual Reactions of Schizophrenic
Patients, Am. Psychol. 8:445, 1953.
11.

Alexander, L.: Effect of Electroshock on a
“Normal” Person, Am. J. Psychiat. 109:696—698,
12.

1953.

Printed and Published in the United States of Amerira

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2434">
                <text>Relation of amobarbital test to clinical improvement in electroshock. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1956 Jul; 76(1): 23-9.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2435">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2436">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-17-021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2437">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2438">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Weinstein, Edwin A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2439">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2440">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2441">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry July 1956, Vol. 76, pp. 23—29.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2442">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2443">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74446">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81007">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87568">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94129">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="243" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="34">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f36132b2b1eb8c86e51e7a9456e9e17d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>aca2be98c9971c66ad807e1d64ee1b8a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100660">
                    <text>Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Volume IV

July, 1955

Number 3

��DELUSIONAL REDUPLICATION OF PARTS OF
THE BODY AFTER INSULIN COMA
THERAPY1
ROBERT

L.

Ph.D.,2

N. GRAUBERT, M.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

KAI-IN,

DAVID

In recent years studies of behavioral changes occurring in altered
states of brain function have gone beyond the description and
interpretation of isolated phenomena. Emphasis has been placed
on such factors as the particular environmental situation in which

the behavior occurs, the total constellation or syndrome of associated
behavioral changes, and the inﬂuence of the premorbid personality.
Using these additional methods of study it has been demonstrated
that many types of behavior found in brain disease are not defects,
such as impairment of perception or memory, but represent forms
of adaptation to the stress of illness (16). It has also been shown
that various phenomena are not bizarre curiosities or unrelated
fragments of neurological dysfunction, but form part of an orderly
and meaningful pattern of an altered interaction with the environment.
This report of a single case is presented because of the unusual
opportunity it provides to study some of these behavioral changes.
First, the patient was in a psychiatric hospital, under observation
and in psychotherapy for four months, which made it possible to
have an accurate and comprehensive picture of his behavior prior
to brain damage. Secondly, the neurological symptoms were of rapid
1From the Research Service, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York. This
investigation was supported in part by grant M-927 from the National Institute
of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service
and by a fellowship of the Dazian Foundation for Medical Research (Dr. Kahn).
This paper was read, in part, at a meeting of the New York Society for Clinical
Psychiatry at Hillside Hospital, on March 10, 1955.
2Research Assistant, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
3Resident Psychiatrist, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
iDirector of the Research Service, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
134

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

135

onset and actually developed in the presence of the examiners.
Finally, it was possible to observe the patient intensively for a prolonged period afterwards, so that the subsequent changes in behavior could be adquately studied.
It is the purpose of this report to evaluate (1) the signiﬁcance of
the alterations in behavior, particularly the delusion of having extra
parts of the body, and (2) the implication of the subsequent change
in behavior for the understanding of the mechanism of somatic
therapies.
CASE HISTORY

Present Illness
The patient, a 34-year-old man, became acutely ill the night of
September 25, 1954. Standing with clenched ﬁsts, gritting his teeth
and without saying a word, he kept his wife in a corner of their
bedroom for hours. The patient's family summoned a psychiatrist
who referred him for immediate hospitalization. He received 15
electroshock treatments in a three~week period with some improvement. On transfer to Hillside Hospital, however, the patient was
lethargic and failed to answer many questions. He said that he had
come to the hospital for such reasons as “stomach disease,” “to talk
over something with my wife,” and “to prepare myself for an examination." He felt he was being watched; that he was inﬂuenced
by voices coming through the heating system; was being poisoned
from a distance; and that there were changes in his body. He said he
knew the exact minute when his wife was being unfaithful to him
and expressed feelings that the world was coming to an end. There
were frequent auditory hallucinations of being called unpleasant
and derogatory names.
Past History and Premorbid Personality
This was the patient’s ﬁrst recorded psychotic episode. He is the
youngest of ﬁve siblings, being the only boy. His father and mother
were continually busy running a candy stand, and the patient was
cared for primarily by his sisters. As a child he was dependent,
demanding, and sought to be the center of attention. He developed
a ﬂair for comedy and playing the clown to the extent that he was
expected to have a career as a comedian, and on one occasion won
second prize in an amateur show. At 12 years of age he became
interested in playing drums. This became his sole preoccupation,
for he devoted every spare moment to them. The patient suffered
episodes of rheumatic fever at 10 years of age and again at 20 and,

�136

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FINK

at these times, was pampered by his family. During his late adolescence he was withdrawn, spending much of his time at his
parents’
candy stand. He became overly concerned with his
appearance and
masculinity, brushed his hair for lengthy periods, exercised to acquire a good build, worried about his chest expansion and, according to his family, stared at his reﬂection in a mirror “kind of
waiting
for hair to grow on his chest." He
spent much time exercising his
left arm because he wanted it to be as
strong as his right. He was
concerned about a tooth that had not developed fully
on the right
side of his mouth. To prevent people from
noticing this he developed the habit of talking and laughing out of the left side of his
mouth, giving the appearance of facial asymmetry.
He never enjoyed or settled down to
any work. Besides his efforts
as a comedian and drummer, he worked in a
pocketbook factory, in
a ladies apparel concern, and wrote
songs and short stories. He was
discharged from one position because he clowned all day
long
amusing his co-workers. He became a beautician after a friend interested him in it. He wanted to quit this too, but remained
at the
insistence of his fiancee. He was not ambitious for
money, but very
much wanted to ﬁnd a place for himself,
needing reassurance about
his sense of belonging. Although he comes from
a secretive family
where each member keeps things to himself, the
patient was de—
scribed as warm and friendly and drawn to the
cause of people
he considered the underdog or discriminated
against. He was
sentimental, being quite upset when having to visit someone in
a
hospital. He was overly sensitive and easily hurt, though not
argumentative.
The family reported a change in his behavior during the
past
six years. He had become more secretive about his
friends and
activities. He went with his ﬁancée for more than
a year before
anyone in the family knew about it. He developed many somatic
complaints so that frequent visits were made to his physician, without his family’s awareness. Similarly, he told no one that he was in
psychiatric treatment, and maintained his secret even though he
found it necessary to steal money from his mother’s store to
for
pay
this. He also kept secret his difﬁculty in
hearing for many months.
During the war he was drafted into service, became worried
about having to go overseas, and sought and received a medical
discharge because of rheumatic heart disease. Since 1948 he has
been in intermittent psychiatric treatment. This was
begun at the
persuasion of a friend who was in therapy. The psychiatrist stated
that the main effect of the therapy was to get him to look for
some

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

137

kind of work, although he conﬁrms the patient’s inability to hold
one job for any length of time. During this period two of his sisters
have been under extensive psychiatric treatment for severe phobic
reactions.
He has been married for 21/2 years, never having dated much
previously. His mother believes this the result of his being “pretty
much of a home boy” and his fears about his rheumatic heart. His
sister, on the other hand, reports that the mother made him feel
guilty about leaving her alone in the store. She said he felt the
responsibility of helping his mother ever since his father’s illness
and death, and that he expressed feelings of guilt in leaving her to
get married.
The patient met his wife in 1951 at a party, and was married in
1953. During the ﬁrst two years of their marriage, the patient’s
wife had two miscarriages. The second one in particular affected the
patient. Soon thereafter he complained that there was something
wrong with him, that he was not enough of a man, and that there
must be a sickness in his body causing his wife to have abortions.
He became increasingly depressed, withdrawn and fearful. Later,
he became convinced his wife was unfaithful to him and that his
wife and brother-in-law were conspiring against him.
Course in Hillside Hospital
During his hospitalization he became more withdrawn, and careless in his appearance and in the care of his room. He had little
contact with other patients, and was preoccupied with his delusional
thoughts and hallucinations.
Physical examination revealed a presystolic and systolic murmur at the apex and a systolic murmur at the base without accentuation of the pulmonary sounds, or signs of enlargement of the
heart. His blood serology was negative. There were no neurological
ﬁndings except for right facial asymmetry and bilaterally diminished
hearing. An electroencephalogram shortly after admission showed
well-modulated, occasional random 5-7 cps activity, with 90% alpha.
It was interpreted as showing minimal abnormality, consistent with
drowsiness or a history of recent electroshock therapy.
An amytal test for brain disease (13) was done on November 24,
1954. There was no change in orientation or awareness of illness,
but he became more communicative and showed less overt tension
during the procedure. Insulin coma treatment was instituted on December 8, 1954, and he had his ﬁrst coma on December 30. During
the course of 18 coma treatments there was no signiﬁcant change in

�138

-

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FINK

behavior until the morning of January 27, 1955.
On that day he had
his 19th treatment, was given 370 units
of insulin, and went into
coma for an hour and 50 minutes, comparable to his
previous
reactions. Following gavage he did
not respond in the usual time, and
he was given glucose intravenously. He
awakened promptly, and was
responsive, but a marked right hemiplegia was noted.
He lay in bed with his head and
eyes deviated to the left. There
was no evidence of aphasia when tested for
naming objects. He had
a right facial paresis and a right homonymous
hemianopia
on
confrontation. Reﬂexes were diminished on the
right with a positive
Babinski, and there was a right hemisensory
syndrome with extinction on simultaneous stimulation tests.
He raised his left arm on command but failed
to respond when
told to move his right arm. When his
right arm was raised by the
examiner and he was asked to identify it, he looked
at it for some
moments and said it was a “stranger” and “an intruder.”
He reported
smilingly that there was an extra arm on the
right. He was unable
to move his right leg on command, and he asked
if it were his own.

saying that he had seen him sometime in the
past.
The patient consistently showed this phenomenon of
the reduplicated arm for the next hour. He referred to it
as an “extra arm,”
“a third arm,” and “a bootleg arm,”
or personiﬁed it as a “stranger,”
"this intruder” and “that fellow.” When his
right arm was shown to
him, he denied knowing whose arm it was,
asking one of the attendants, “Did you slip me this arm—did you pick this
old
at
an
up
auction in the neighborhood?” Another time when
asked to whom it
belonged, he said “I’m willing to pay a reward for it,
and you’re
asking me point blank.” He said he was sure that the
arm
was
not
his because “it doesn’t extend from
my body” and “the dirt under
the ﬁngernail is not recognizable.” The
patient denied any disability of his own right arm, but said he’d never seen the
extra
arm
work. He said, “My arm I can move with a brain
impulse; this one
I have to move manually since it isn’t mine.”
During the course of
questions about weakness in his right arm he said, “If that
extra
arm belongs to me, then I’m sicker than I thought I was.”
The patient did not react to painful stimulation
applied to his

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

139

right arm or leg. Even with his eyes open and his attention directed
to the point of stimulation, he denied perceiving any stimulation on
the right arm, saying “You’re not fooling me—you’re not touching
me—you’re touching this third arm, that intruder.” He correctly
identiﬁed stimuli applied to the right shoulder, but from the elbow
down the touch was displaced to the extra arm. The patient lay
with his head and eyes deviated to the left throughout the examination. He had difﬁculty perceiving any stimulus in the right side
of space, a phenomenon which has been termed “spatial inattention." When given phrases to read he ignored the right side, reading
only the material on the extreme left. Thus, “GOOD HUMOR
ICE CREAM” was read as “GL.” When his right arm lay at his side
he had trouble ﬁnding it. Once, when he was asked to show it to
the examiner, he looked over his left side only and said, “I think
I’ve been robbed—where is it?”
A lumbar puncture was done and a clear, colorless ﬂuid obtained.
The ﬂuid was under increased pressure even though the patient
was relaxed. The pressure was recorded as 300 mm., the total protein
was 32 mg. per cent, and there were two white cells per cubic mm.
During the ensuing hours the patient continued to be euphoric
and loquacious. He recited long-forgotten lessons and parts of neurological texts whose source was unknown to him. For instance, he
gave a complete description of the course of the facial nerve, and
described the muscles of the face, calling them by their correct Latin
names. He laughed frequently, and recited cryptic remarks as “in
the instrument—insulin—instrument—insulin—instrument ward.”
Disturbances in memory or recall were not elicited. The delusional
“extra arm” disappeared.
An electroencephalogram obtained that afternoon was ﬂat in all
leads on the left side and showed random 5-7 cps activity, chieﬂy on
the right side. Both alpha and beta were prominent on the right
side only. The record was interpreted as showing diffuse dysfunction
with left-sided accentuation.
In the afternoon the patient was subdued. The weakness of the
leg and arm showed some resolution. His relationship to his therapist was completely changed compared to his previous behavior.
There was a complete absence of anger, negativism, withdrawal and
depression. He clung to his doctor, shook hands, held him back and
did not want to be separated from him. He was pleasantly preoccupied with the morning’s episode and joked about it. He was eager to
communicate, and even his hearing seemed to have improved.
The next morning the patient was depressed, restless, bewildered,

�140

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FIN K

slow in answering questions and failed to
respond when asked about
his illness. He spoke in a low voice, at times inaudible.
He was disoriented for time of day and was aware of “numbness” in his
right
arm. He spontaneously asked, “What happened to
me—why am I
taking all this depletion?" Minimal weakness of the right arm and
leg were noted. There was astereognosis in the
right hand, but
tactile stimuli were correctly localized, and there
was no evidence
of hemianopia or inattention. When asked about the
extra arm the
patient was vague and evasive, but did say, “Evidently
somebody
else was with me and it was their
arm I picked up."
That afternoon the patient was given 0.5
gm. amytal sodium.
Besides its use as a test for organic brain
dysfunction, the drug was
given in an attempt to elicit the delusion again (14). At this time
there was neither a change in orientation nor a
recurrence of the
reduplication. There was, however, a marked change in mood and
language. The patient became very euphoric and talkative. His
speech was characterized by ornate, circumstantial,
pedantic, histrionic, and cryptic features, with much use of clichés. For
example,
asked about the extra arm, he said, “I think it will
come looking for
me when and if the occasion is propitious, as it were.” When asked
why he was here, he said, “On the recommendation of the
right

honorable Dr. Fink, most distinguished doctor on the
eastern seaboard Atlantic area whose fame has spread far and wide."
Several
times he blurted out the cryptic remark—“transference
of aggression." When asked what he meant, he said, “If
you can’t kick your
mother-in-law in the head, you try
your father-in-law.”
When asked about his arm the patient was evasive, circumstantial and jocular. For example, asked how the extra
arm was different
from his own arm, he said, “How was it different? For
one reason,
in the sensitivity of feel. I raised
up my left arm and that was all
right. When I went to raise up what I thought was
right
my
arm
that was all right. But when I went to raise this third
arm I did not
feel any sensitivity when raising it,
lifting it, touching it or otherwise in no manner could I relate it to
my corpus—.” When asked
about weakness in his right arm, he said, “It feels little less
a
dynamic in its volition, and I’m tempted to believe in its
delivery, as it

were.”
While the delusion was not present at this time, the
patient
insisted that there had been an extra arm the
day before, saying,
“I was lying in bed and it came to
my aware the presence of another
arm in my bed.” When he was told that the extra arm was
really
his own right arm, he said, “Well, I’ll tell
you. I never argue with

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

141

facts. You see if you’re surmising that it was, and I were to agree, it
would be only for professional courtesy’s sake.” Or at another time,
when the possibility of the extra arm was being questioned by the
examiner, the patient said, “I don’t think it was mine. It might have
been mine, you see, but then I would have to have a comprehensive
knowledge of the numerous preponderous volumes of ancient history in associated situations. And then I might be even able to
volunteer that extra leg which you spoke of before—and beyond.
I might even—be able to extend some photographs of the uterus
which I own. If I could have the extra arm, the additional leg, and
as I said, other things.”
For the next two days he continued to be depressed, spoke slowly
in a low voice, and showed no spontaneity. He complained of feeling
“depleted.” There was no difficulty getting him into a conversation
and he would elaborate in a circumstantial way about the pain in
his head and the numbness in his hand. He refused to get into conversation about his extra arm, saying, “You're making fun of me."
Neurological examination was completely negative.
An electroencephalogram on February 2, 1955 showed a resolution of the asymmetry and abnormality of the previous record. It
was similar to that obtained on admission. The patient was given
amytal again on February 2 and 9. On both occasions he showed a
similar response to that obtained on January 28, with euphoria and
changes in language. His attitude, however, toward the extra arm
and to the weakness of his right arm was altered. He now said that
the extra arm might have been a hallucination due to the drugs he
was receiving. He also admitted having had weakness of his right
arm, saying, “To the best of my recollection there was a general
weakness which might have had a speciﬁc attenuating dilemma in
the appearance of an arm which might have been, to some degree,
in a state of difﬁculty.” On March 2, he was given amytal again. This
time his reaction was more like that seen on admission, although
he became slightly euphoric and loquacious toward the end.
In the weeks following the eventful insulin coma, there was a
change in his clinical behavior. He appeared more sure of himself,
and was co-operative and friendly. He started to press for his discharge. He said that there were things to be done which he, and not
somebody else, should do, but would not specify these things. His
wife visited him and told him she had decided to divorce him and
would not accept him back in his home. The patient took this
announcement without overt emotion. He was unable to give any
reason for his wife’s plans, and stated that he forgot to ask her why.

�142

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FINK

He still wanted to be sent home as soon as
possible because, he said,
he was ready to take up some kind of business. He felt
that he had
failed up to now because of reasons unclear to
him, but that if he
were careful, it would not happen to him again.
This behavior was markedly different from that shown
admison
sion. In contrast to hisprevious aggressive,
uncommunicative and
withdrawn behavior, he was co-operative,
ingratiating, overanxious
to please, and made attempts at socializing with other
patients. His
of a psychiatrist.
DISCUSSION

The delusion of reduplication of parts of the
body has rarely
been reported. The earliest
reports are by Bechterev (1) in 1926 and
Ehrenwald (3) in 1930. In 1935, Schenderov and
Gamaleja
(9) described six cases and suggested that more
might be found if the
phenomenon were better known. In these early studies the
phenomenon was regarded as a neurologic curiosity and was
explained
on
the basis of sensory disturbances. In the work of
Critchley (2), who
reported a similar case in 1952, it was considered as a manifestation
of disturbance in “body image" due to
a parietal lobe lesion of the
nondominant hemisphere.
In 1954, four cases were reported by Weinstein et al.
(14) demonstrating that the phenomenon could not be explained on the basis
of sensory impairment, and was not
dependent on a focal parietal
lesion. They interpreted the delusion as
a symbolic phenomenon
rather than a sensory or perceptual disturbance, and showed
that it
occurred only in a setting of diffuse cerebral dysfunction.
indiThey
cated that parts of the body were redupli‘cated which
were defective
in some way, regardless of whether or not there
was any neurological

involvement.

It

was pointed out that the delusional
reduplication of body
parts is but one manifestation of reduplicative phenomena. Thus
reduplication for time, place and person has also been
reported
(11). In reduplication for time the patient confabulates
that a present experience has also been experienced at a time in the
past. For
example, a patient identiﬁes members of the staff as old friends
or
relatives. Reduplication for place is the confabulation
that two or
more places with the same name and similar attributes exist, when
actually. there is only one. Thus, a patient
may say there are two

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

143

hospitals with the same name and same staff, but locate one closer
to his home and describes it as a hospital which treats convalescent
or minor cases only. In reduplication for person the patient confabulates the existence of two persons when there is actually only one.
One woman, for instance, said she had two sons, one named “Bill,”
and the other “Willie," when actually she had one son named
William.
It was shown by Weinstein et a1. (14) that reduplication was
usually expressed in more than one modality. All patients with delusional reduplication of body parts showed, in addition, reduplication for time, place and/or person. In the present case the patient
also expressed temporal reduplication, describing one of the examiners as someone he had known prior to his hospitalization.
The symbolic importance of the various phenomena of reduplication is evident in their motivational character. In the perception
of a doctor as an old friend or a relative the patient is reassuring
himself that he has less to fear than he would from a total stranger.
In reduplication for place the patient who locates the extra hospital
near his home or describes it as treating only convalescent or minor
cases is minimizing his illness. The patient who confabulated having
two sons, while denying her own illness, complained that poor
“Willie" was in an accident and was afraid that something terrible
had happened to him, thus displacing her concern from herself to
the extra person.
The delusion of reduplication of parts of the body also is a
mechanism facilitating denial of illness. While the patient states
that there is nothing wrong with his own body, it is the reduplicated
arm or leg which is said to be weak or impaired. In the present
instance the patient, who in his premorbid behavior was excessively
worried about bodily ailments, was unconcerned about his severe
disability. Instead, by denying having any trouble with his arm and
saying it was the ”extra” arm that didn’t work, he was able to maintain his euphoria and jocularity.
While reduplication is shown mainly as a symbolic adaptation
to the problem of illness, it may also be a symbolic expression of
other wishes, needs and feelings. For example, a patient with intractable pain had been noisy and demanding and had aroused the
antagonism of members of the staff. Following a course of electroshock therapy her complaints of pain were gone and her relations
with the staff were considerably improved. Along with other
changes in orientation, she confabulated that there were two Mount

�144

KAHN—GRAUBERT—FIN K

Sinai Hospitals, the old one where people were mean to her, and
the new one where everybody was so nice (12).
The delusional reduplication of parts of the body appears to be
related to certain aspects of the premorbid personality. In the present case, and in those reported by Weinstein et al. (14), all the patients demonstrated a special concern with the symbolic importance
of physical characteristics. Our patient was concerned with his
build, the strength of the muscles of his left arm and the presence
of hair on his chest. He was also sensitive about a tooth which had
not come out fully and attempted to conceal it. In the earlier study
(14) a patient who had developed the delusion of multiple heads
following a craniotomy, had been preoccupied with his baldness and
had engaged in numerous extramarital affairs to prove that he was
capable of attracting women. A patient, who confabulated having
three eyes, was very sensitive about a prosthetic eye and would face
people directly forward so that divergence Of his eye would not
be noticed. He was also preoccupied with his build and physical
appearance, engaged intensively in Yogi and Judo, and was concerned with his ability to satisfy his wife sexually.
In recent writings on “spatial inattention” (16, 17) it has been
indicated that this, too, represents a form of symbolic adaptation.
In this case the patient consistently avoided looking to the right
side, was unable to ﬁnd the “extra” arm when it lay at his side, and
only read the extreme left part of phrases shown to him. This behavior facilitated the denial of weakness of his right arm as well as
helped maintain his delusion of the extra extremity. His personality
also showed features that have been described as characteristic of
persons with “spatial inattention” (17). He was very secretive, especially in recent years, and seemed overly concerned with the symbolic signiﬁcance of violence, as shown by his discomfort on visiting
hospitals, his fear of going overseas and by an apparent confabulation that he had once been a secret witness to a murder.
The marked ludic behavior shown by the patient during the
period of his delusion and during the later amytal tests is also
related to his premorbid personality. He was described as having
been a good mimic with a ﬂair for clowning. Ludic behavior has
also been regarded as a form of adaptive behavior (15) in which the
patient acts out a feeling of well-being, implicitly denying his illness.
It is of theoretical interest that the delusional reduplication and
“spatial inattention” occurred with right-sided symptoms. Disorders
of the “body image” and spatial awareness have been regarded as
characteristic of nondominant lesions. In this case, with apparent

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

145

dominant hemisphere involvement but without aphasia, it was possible to study these behavioral changes as clearly as with nondom—
inant lesions. One must conclude that in the usual case of a dominant lesion, pathology which is sufficiently extensive for these
changes to occur, will also result in an aphasic disorder which masks
the phenomena.
The neurologic lesion which was the basis for the reported
of
diffuse
behavior
in
alteration
dysfunction
a
and
was
phenomena
the cerebrum with accentuation of the left hemisphere. Such disturbances in neurologic function are not uncommon in insulin
coma therapy, and are the result of persistent cellular dysfunction
despite restoration of the glucose level of the blood. While one may
ascribe etiological importance in the production of this patient’s
hemiplegia to the history of rheumatic fever and the cardiac murmurs, this is not warranted considering the absence of other rheumatic phenomena either before or subsequent to the event. It is
more meaningful to regard this incident as one manifestation of the
central nervous system damage incurred by prolonged hypoglycemia.
Such manifestations include all aspects of nervous system functions
including seizures, transient hemiplegia and aphasia, confusional
syndrome and Korsakoff psychoses, prolonged coma and death (6).
Recent studies of the electroencephalographic changes during prolonged coma (18) and minor neurologic signs following insulin
coma treatment (19) amplify the variety of neurologic sequelae of
this treatment.
The importance of cerebral damage in the mechanism of somatic
therapies has recently been re-emphasized by Weinstein and Kahn
(12, 16). They suggest that improvement following somatic therapies
is characterized by manifestations of denial in a milieu of altered
brain function. A study in this laboratory (5) has supported this
hypothesis concerning electroshock therapy; Improved patients
showed signiﬁcantly earlier and more persistent alterations in brain
function as measured by the amytal test (13) and by serial electroencephalographic studies (4), and more changes in language and
behavior indicative of denial, than did patients who failed to
improve.
Recent case reports of the effects of prolonged insulin coma by
Revitch (8), Kwalwasser and Caplan (7), Shagass and Rowsell (10),
and Yeager et a1. (18) point to the behavioral improvement and discerebral
when
of
damage superschizophrenic
symptoms
appearance
venes. In this patient, too, there was an immediate, marked and
cerebral
with
concomitant
behavior
damage.
in
change
persistent

�KAHN—GRAUBERT—FINK

146

It was possible here to demonstrate not only explicit verbal denial
of illness, but other aspects of denial as reduplication, spatial inat-

tention and changes in mood and language. Thus, the observations
in his case are consistent with the hypothesis of Weinstein and
Kahn. Further studies of the role of premorbid personality in denial, and on the mechanism of somatic therapies are now in progress.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

A case history is presented of a 34-year-old man with a fourmonth history of acute mental illness who was placed on insulin
coma therapy. After his 19th coma he developed a right hemiplegia,
hemianopia, hemisensory syndrome and “spatial inattention,” and
became ludic, euphoric and loquacious.'At this time he showed
delusional reduplication of body parts, expressing the conviction
that while there was nothing the matter with his right arm, there
was an “extra" arm in his bed which did not belong to him and
which did not work.
2. The signiﬁcance of reduplication is discussed in terms of a
symbolic adaptation to illness. This phenomenon, as well as his
other changes in behavior such as “spatial inattention" and ludic
behavior, is considered to be related to his premorbid personality.
3. The presence of these phenomena in a case with right-sided
symptoms is considered with reference to anatomical localization.
These ﬁndings contradict the traditional view that “body image"
disorders and “spatial inattention” depend on a nondominant
hemisphere lesion.
4. The subsequent changes in the patient’s behavior, in which
he showed complete recovery from his illness, is discussed in terms
of its implications for the mechanism of action of insulin coma
therapy. The results are considered to support the theoretical view
that improvement in the somatic therapies is characterized by manifestations of denial in a milieu of altered brain function.
1.

REFERENCES
Bechterev, V. M.: Obozr. Psikh., 1926, cited by Schenderov and Gamaleja.
Critchley, M.: A Phantom Supernumerary Limb after a Cervical Root
Lesion, Arq. Neuro-Psiquit., 10:269-275. 1952.
(3) Ehrenwald, H.: Altered Perception of the Body Image with Consequent
Psychosis in Left Hemiplegia. Mschr. f. Psychiat. u. Neurol., 75:89-97, 1930.
(4) Fink, M. and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of Electroencephalographic Changes and
Improvement in Electroshock Therapy. In preparation.

(1)
(2)

�REDUPLICATION OF BODY PARTS IN I.C.T.

147

Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.: Relation Between Altered Brain
Function and Denial in Electroshock Therapy. In preparation.
(6) Kalinowsky, L. B. and Hoch, P.: Shack Treatment, Psychasurgery and Other
Somatic Treatment in Psychiatry (2nd ed.). New York: Grune 8c Stratton,
(5)

1952.

and Caplan, M.: A Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma: Treatment. This Journal, 1:145-155, 1952.
Revitch, E.: Observations on Organic Brain Damage and Clinical Improvement Following Protracted Insulin Coma. Psychiat. Quart., 28:72-92, 1954.
Schenderov, L. I. and Gamaleja, K. N.: Peculiar Disturbance of Body Scheme
in Hemiplegics (Pseudomelia). J. Nevrol. Psihhiat. i Psikhogig., 4:361-372,

(7) Kwalwasser, S.
(8)
(9)

1935.

and Rowsell, P. W.: Serial Electroencephalographic and Clinical
Studies in a Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. (‘5' Psychiat., 72:705-711. 1954.
(11) Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugarman, L. A.: Phenomenon of Reduplication. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat., 67:808-814, 1952.
(12) Weinstein, E. A., Linn, L., and Kahn, R. L.: Psychosis During Electroshock
Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of Shock Therapy. Am. J. Psychiat.,

(10) Shagass, C.

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)

109:22-26, 1952.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Sugarman, L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic
Use of Amobarbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium") in Brain Disease. Am. J.
Psychiat., 109:889-894, 1953.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., Malitz, S., and Rozanski, ].: Delusional Reduplication of Parts of the Body. Brain, 77:45-60, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Sugarman, L. A.: Ludic Behavior in Patients with Brain Disease. This journal, 3298-106, 1954.
Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness. Springﬁeld, 111.:

Charles C. Thomas, 1955.
(17) Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. L., and Slote, W.: Withdrawal, Inattention and
Pain Asymbolia. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. (9 Psychiat., in press.
(18) Yeager, C. L., Simon, A., Margolis, L. H., and Burch, N. R.: Electroencephalographic Studies in Posthypoglycemic Coma. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis.,
118:435-441, 1953.
(19) Ziegler, D. K.: Minor Neurologic Signs and Symptoms Following Insulin
Coma Therapy. J. Nero. (3' Ment. Dis., 120:75-78, 1954.

�6&amp;3»; a;

M '4
’

u

��an m w

‘~

w

m at m w m was. M M
,
'

,

..
”MW;
mm a; m.

.

M3mg, W
M §F
mm
man—5....

������������mmmmmwwmmmiw-

mummmuummmnmmmmm~'
hag-6“}

m

IZLv*"'

,-Mv.-..‘w+,w

A

.w

~

��'

~19-

a We
"a

u

'

of

W M w W m M a -::.,.;

m m mm mm M m u m
.

���WW*WWMWW“WWMMWW

‘

WMWNWWWQﬂiwwm‘
a m. m m mm m mm w
-

Wmmwgmmwwmamwmw
.
*meummmim «WM
W W M Wm w w
m «mm W

(X);

.

mammary In

wmmmmmmwmwmm

�,,

m w W» m W mm m m

��m

mM

m

-

,

�Vt,“

~

m

as.

a. m

»
~

~

‘
-

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2424">
                <text>Delusional reduplication of parts of body after insulin coma therapy. Journal of the Hillside Hospital, 4: 134-147, 1955.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2425">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2426">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-16-020</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2427">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2428">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Graubert, David N.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2429">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2430">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2431">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL Volume IV July, 1955 Number 3.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2432">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2433">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74445">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81006">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87567">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94128">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6747" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6545">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c8041bb911b27dd176a67a53d9ba080c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>51e8ec2d2ba520c72d5afb41bd417d27</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107150">
                    <text>Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy

Robert L. Kahn Ph.D. and

From

Max

Pollack Ph.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,

L.I., N.Y.
Aided, in part, by grants M-927 and MY-2092 of the National
Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U.S.
Glen Oaks,

Public Health Service.
Read at the Eastern Psychiatric Research Association,
October 25, 1958.
IV: 10-2h-58

New

York,

�Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in
Convulsive Therapy
One

of the more important

clinical applications of

psychological testing techniques is the prediction of the
has
there
In
treatment.
in
particular,
results
psychiatric
been a considerable effort to determine valid psychological
The
to
results
somatic
the
for
therapies.
criteria
prognostic
date, however, have not found clinical acceptance.
Using the Rorschach, for example, Rabin (1) has stated
that ”single Rorschach factors cannot serve as indices or as
has
Piotrowski
In
contrast
of
improvement."
predictors
published a number of papers on the prognostic use of the
Rorschach in insulin coma and convulsive therapy (2, 3, h, S, 6).
Unfortunately, his criteria, as reported in successive papers,
are vague and contradictory. In l9h1 he reported six explicit
prognostic signs which were applied in predicting clinical
months
the
termination
of
several
after
a
over
period
response
of treatment. But Rees and Jones (7), in a study of schizophrenic
found
somatic
that
of
a
therapies,
receiving
variety
patients
Piotrowski's signs were related to the results on a chance basis
only.
The differences in the studns of various investigators
can be accounted for by methodological variables. These
variables include factors of population, number of patients
observed, the method of analyzing data, the kind of somatic
therapy utilized, and the criteria for evaluating improvement,

�-2made
in
evaluation
is
which
the
clinical
time
the
at
including
incon—
Another
for
basis
treatment.
of
relation to the course
sistent results may be the lack of an adequate theretical
framework.

in
been
have
we
engaged
several
years
past
These
were
studies
convulsive
of
therapy
the
process.
studies
mode
action
of
the
concerning
a
to
hypothesis
test
initiated
of convulsive therapy which was derived from observations on a
hypothesis
of
the
to
brain-damaged pepulation. According
Weinstein and Kahn (8, 9) the therapeutic effect of convulsive
function
brain
of
altered
the
induction
to
therapy was related
of
symbolic
a
new
type
for
conditions
the
creating
necessary
adaptation, mainly denial, in characterologically disposed
shown
altered
that
have
Our
already
studies
previous
persons.
change
behavioral
for
condition
a
function
is
brain
necessary
(10, 11) and that the manifestation of denial language patterns
with treatment is related to the evaluation of improvement (12).
The purpose of the present report is
l) to summarize the
the
and
demonstrate
2)
to
on
personality factors,
findings
application of these findings as prognostic criteria for
convulsive therapy.
For the

�Method:

studies were conducted at Hillside Hospital, a
non-profit, voluntary, mental hospital, admitting patients
who are considered as having early and curable illnesses.
Psychotherapy is the principal treatment employed, with
somatic therapies available when needed. The material presented was collected in a series of studies during a period of
three and a half years. While a total of 180 patients have been
investigated, varying numbers were tested with each of the
techniques of personality evaluation. The patients ranged in
age from 20 to 66, with a median of hS, and included twice as
These

many women as men.

All patients received convulsive therapy administered
three times a week, using either a Medcraft alternating current
instrument or a Reiter C-h? electrostimulator. A minimum of
12 treatments was given, with the total course determined by
the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the convulsive therapy
unit. All psychological procedures were adminstered in the
week prior to the start of treatment.
The determination of the patient's response to treatment
was based on the medical director's evaluation at the time of
discharge, usually within six to eight weeks following treatment.

�Procedures and Results:
1.

Family Interviews.

According to the original

theory, it was considered that persons showing characteristics
of the "explicit verbal denial" personality, as described by
Weinstein and Kahn (13) would be most likely to show a behavioral change rated as improvement following treatment. This
was tested in a standardized interview with members of the
patient's family, eliciting information on the patient's
attitudes, mode of communication and reactions to stress.
Fifteen areas of behavior considered to be related to denial
tendencies were scored from the interview material. A score
of O, 1 and 2 was given for each item, depending on whether
the designated behavior was minimally, moderately or markedly
shown. The sum of the scores thus obtained was used as the
denial score.
The relatives of h? patients were interviewed, and
denial personality scores ranged from O to 25, with a median
of 11. The patients were divided into two groups: those with
scores from 11 to 25 were classed as "high denial," and those
from 0 to 10 as the ”low denial" group.

results of this analysis were significant, showing
that of the patients with high denial scores, 58% were in the
much improved group and only one patient was unimproved. Of
the patients with low denial scores, on the other hand, only
The

30%

were much improved and an equal number were unimproved (1h).

�-5-

results based on family interviews
felt that our conceptions of prognostic

Although these
were promising,

we

personality factors could be extended and made more amenable
to practical application by the use of standardized psycholog-

ical procedures.
For this purpose the Rorschach test
2.

The

Rorschach Test:

We

used.
have obtained Rorschach
was

protocols in 87 patients receiving convulsive therapy. The
&amp;
of
the
to
records were scored according
Klopfer
criteria
Kelley (15). Only those components were analyzed which were
considered related to the personality aspects under study.
It was found (16) that the much improved patients had

significantly fewer total number of responses, and a significantly
greater per cent of whole and form responses than did those
The
who
rated
as
unimproved.
were
stereotypy and
patients
limited imaginative capacity of the much improved patients
was also shown by their giving a greater percentage of popular
responses, with little diversification of content categories.
They were less likely to have any kind of shading response.
Those patients who had human movement (M) responses had the
poorest clinical responses, while those with no movement of
any kind had the best results. With respect to color, an F6
response was associated with a poor clinical result, while those
with no color at all did very well.
Combining some of these factors tended to sharpen the
differentiation in terms of outcome. Thus, of those who had

�.6.
In
much
improved.
as
rated
both
M
much
66%
improved
FC,
were
with
nor
neither
those
of
contrast,
and only one patient was unimproved.
We have converted these results into prognostic criteria,
M

and FC, only

as shown

in Table

I.

17%

In one column are

listed those

Rorschach

closely related to a favorable
In the other column are those factors which are

factors which have been
prognosis.

were

most

For
example,
outcome.
unfavorable
clinical
of
an
prognostic
67%
much
were
of those patients with ten or less responses
16
more
with
or
those
of
28%,
responses
however,
Only
improved.
had a good

result.

�TABLE

I

Prognostic Rorschach Indices of ImErovement
Favorable Prognosis
%

Unfavorable Prognosis

Much

%

Ingroved

Improved

of Responses

Number

Movement

Color
F

and

FC

less

(67%)

16 or more

(28%)

present
present

(28%)

None

(63%)

M

No FC

(60%)

FC

-

75

a:

Shading
M

10 or

~

100

None

Much

(21%)

(59%)

o - 59

(27%)

(58%)

Present

(33%)

Neither Present

(66%)

Both Present(17%)

�’8-

It

should also be noted that comparison of post treatment

Rorschach records with those obtained prior to treatment failed
to show any significant change. This confirms similar observa-

tions by others (6, 17, 18, 19) and indicates that the Rorschach
pattern is probably a reflection of the basic personality rather
than transient aspects of the disease process.
3. Social Attitudes: The F Scale. While these Rorschach
results amply confirm the concept of the relation of personality
factors and results of treatment, further data was obtained in
application of measures of social attitude such as the California
F Scale.
This scale, originally developed in studies of ethnOa
centrism and authoritarianism (20) has been increasingly used
in the study of more central psychological processes. In our
laboratory the F Scale has been regarded primarily as a reflection
of stereotyped thinking and communication. It has been observed
that patients who receive convulsive therapy at Hillside Hospital
P
scores than those given psychotherapy
higher
significantly
alone (21).
In these studﬂs a ten-item modification of the F Scale
(22) has been used. The test is rapidly administered, taking no
longer than 10 minutes in most cases. The subject reads 10
ambiguous statements and indicates whether he agrees or disagrees
with each statement, and to what extent. The score given for
each item ranges from one to seven and the range of total scores
is 10 to 70. The greater the agreement, the higher the score

have

�-9-

statements themselves are extreme, conventional
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one of the statements
is: "If people would talk less and work more, everybody would
obtained.

be

The

better off."
This

test

patients prior to
score of ho as a cut-off point,we

has been given to 96

convulsive therapy. Using a
found that of those patients with scores of ho or more 71% were
rated as recovered or much improved. In contrast, only 36% of
those with scores below ho were so rated. In general, the

higher the score, the better the clinical result.
We have also tested an additional 13 patients, referred
for convulsive therapy, but who either refused treatment or
terminated it of their own accord prior to completion. Of
these, eleven had F scores below ho, an observation consistent
with the general expectation that such persons haVB a poor
response to convulsive therapy.

�-10-

Discussion:
These observations have shown

that in the course of the

investigation of theoretical problems of convulsive therapy,
certain standard psychological procedures have provided data
which is significantly related to the therapeutic outcome. This
data can now be applied to the practical problem of clinical
prognosis.

that

favorable improvement rating is given
to those patients who develop euphoric, hypomanic or denial modes
of adaptation following treatment (23). Such behavioral change
is most likely to occur in persons whose premorbid personalities
may be characterized as non-empathic, non-introspective, nonverbally communicative and highly conventional and stereotyped
with little imaginative or creative capacity (1h). On the
Rorschach prior to treatment these patients give few reaponses,
fail to show human movement, shading or integrated color responses
(F0) and have little variety of content. 0n the F Scale, their
scores were apt to be over b0, showing a high degree of stereotypy in their communication.
In contrast to such patients, others are either unchanged
by convulsive therapy or develop such modes of reaction as panic,
paranoid behavior, or increased somatic concern, such as
We

have found

a

complaints about their memory. These patients are rated as
unimproved. While this latter group of patients showed diverse
patterns in their premorbid personality characteristics, they
were more apt to be imaginative, introspective and less stereotxnd
in their communications. On the Rorschach they gave human

�-11movement, integrated color and shading responses, and were more
On
good
than
the
prognosis patients.
diversified in their content
the F Scale their scores were most likely to be under ho.

finding that meaningful prognostic criteria can be
derived on the basis of personality constellation rather than in
terms of nosological entities has important implications. For
one thing, this conception leads to the use of further psychologSuch
application is
for
prognostic
ical techniques
purposes.
laboratory
Secondat
Hillside
under
in
Hospital.
our
way
currently
mental
of
increased
an
understanding
derive
to
is
possible
ly, it
disorders, their management and prevention. Thus, we have previously noted (1h) that the same personality factors which are
related to a good prognosis with convulsive therapy, are etiologof
of
psychiathe
certain
types
development
in
important
ically
tric disorder. Studies of patients with psychiatric depression,
for example, demonstrated a prominence of premorbid personality
patterns characterized by the inability to communicate verbally
(2b), and rigidity and lack of imagination (25). Such persons
and
verbal
conventional
to
techniques
are generally refractory
require non-verbal therapeutic techniques. It seems that the
same personality factors which make a person responsdve to nonverbal forms of therapy are involved in his susceptibility to a
depressive reaction. The same stereotypy and conventionality
which lead to a catastrophic response in the individual faced by
the sudden loss of a job or close relative, permit the develop-. t
ment of denial, minimization and displacement under the conditions
of altered brain function and are considered "improved" by the
family and the therapist.
The

�-12-

that in the course of investigation of
theoretical problems of convulsive therapy, certain standard
psychological procedures have provided data which is
significantly related to the therapeutic outcome. This data
can now be applied to the practical problem of clinical
We

have shown

prognosis.
On the Rorschach test, those patients without human
movement, shading or integrated color (FC) responses, few

total responses,

and with

little originality

or variety of

content have the best prognosis. On the F Scale, a score of
less than no is prognostic of a poor clinical reaponse.
The theoretical conception developed in these studies
leads to the application of additional psychological techniques
for prognostic purposes, and to an increasing understanding of
the etiology of psychiatric syndromes with its implications
for management and prevention of such disorders.

�-13-

W
REFERENCES

1.

Rabin, A.I.: Effects of Electric Shock Treatment Upon
Some Aspects of Personality and Intellect, Am. Psychol.
23 28,4,

19b7o

5'1

Rorschach
the
of
Possibilities
Z.:
Prognostic
Piotrowski,
Method in Insulin Treatment, Psychiat. Quart. $3:
679, 1938.

3.

Piotrowski, Z.: Rorschach Manifestations of Improvement
Med.
Psychosom.
in Insulin Treated Schizophrenics,
508’ 1939.

6.

l:

A
the
Device
for
Experimental
Z.:
Single
Piotrowski,
in
Prediction of Outcome of Insulin Treatment19h0
Schizophrenia, Psychiat. Quart. lg: 26?,
Aid
in
Method
a
Prognostic
Rorschach
as
2.:
Piotrowski,
the Insulin Shock Treatment of Schizophrenics,
19h1.
807,
Quart.
lg:
Psychiat.
Effects
N.D.C.:
Z.
and
Lewis,
Piotrowski,
B.L.,
Pacella,
of Electric Convulsive Therapy on Certain Personality
10h:
Am.J.
in
Psychiat.
Traits
Psychiatric Patients,

83, 19h7.

An
Rorschach
of
the
A.M.:
Evaluation
Jones,
Test as aPrognostic Aid in the Treatment of
Coma
Therapy, Electronarcosia
Insulin
by
Schizophrenics
&amp;
Leucotomy, J. Ment. Sci.
Therapy
Electroconvulsive

Rees, W.L. and

21:681, 1951.
Weinstein, E.A., Linn, L. and Kahn, R.L.: Psychosis During
Electroshock Therapy: Its Relation to the Theory of
Shock Therapy, Am. J. Psychiat. 109: 22, 1952.
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Denual of Illness:
Symbolic and Physiological Aspects, Springfield, Ill.
C.C. Thomas, 1955.

10.
11.

12.

of
M.
E.A.:
Relation
and
Weinstein,
Fink,
R.L.,
Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improvement in Electro&amp;
1956.
23,
Neurol.
Arch.
shock,
lg:
Psychiat.
EEG
M.
of
Delta Activity
and
Relation
R.L.:
Kahn,
Fink,
to Behavioral Responses in Electroshock: Quantitative
&amp;
1957.
516,
Neurol.
Arch.
Psychiat.1§:
Serial Studies,

Kahn,

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Changes in Language During

Electro-

shock Therapy. In Psychopathology of Communication,
&amp;
New
Grune
York,
Roch, P. and Zubin, J. Eds.,
Stratton, 1958.

�~1h—

13.

Factors in
Weinstein, E.A. and Kahn, R.L.: Personality
&amp;
Neurol.
Arch.
Denial of Illness,
Psychiat. Q2:
355, 1953.

Personality Factors in Behavioral
Response to Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol. (in
press).

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.;

New
The
Rorschach
D.:
Technique.
Kelley,
Klopfer,
York, World Book Co., 1§E§.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.: Prognostic Value of Rorschach
Criteria in Clinical Response to Convulsive Therapy.
Paper read at Electroshock Research Association
meeting, San Francisco, 1958.
Beck, S.J.: Effects of Shock Therapy on Personality as
Shown by the Rorschach Test, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
ﬁg: h83, 19h3.
Kelley, D., Margolis, H. and Barrera, S.E.: Stability of
the Rorschach Method as Demonstrated in Electric
Convulsive Therapy Cases, Rorsch.Res.Exch. 5: 35, 19b1.

B. and

16.

17.

18.
19.
20.

21.
22.
23.

Kisker, G.W.:

A

Projective Approach to Personality Patterns

During InsulinéShock and Metrazol-Convulsive Therapy,
&amp;
Soc. Psych. 21: 120, 19h2.
Abn.
J.
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D.J. and
New
The
York,
Authoritarian
R.N.:
Personality,
Sanford,
Harper, 1950.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental
HOSpital, J. Hillside Hosp. g: 216, 1957.
Levinson, D.: Personal communication.
Fink, M. and Kahn, R.L.: Behavioral Patterns in Induced
States of Altered Brain Function. Paper read at
Divisional meeting, American Psychiatric Association,
Kahn,

New

York, 1957.

.
A

a

A.

N

a__.....

..-

Cohen, M.B., Baker, R.G., Cohen, R.A., Fromm-Reichmann, F.
and Weigart, E.V.: An Intensive Study of Twelve Cases
of Manic-Depressive Psychosis, Ps chiatr , 11: 103,

195h.

.A-aL.......;.—..M.u

~.~

,
i

Hamilton,

D.M. and Mann, W.A.:

Hospital Treatment of
In Depression, Hoch, P. and
&amp;

Involutional Psychoses.
Zubin, J. Eds., New York, Grune

pp. 199-209-

Stratton, 1952,

j
5

E

t

i
2

1

s

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67464">
                <text>Robert L. Kahn and Max Pollack: Prognostic Application of Psychological Techniques in Convulsive Therapy, 1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67465">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67466">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-14-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67467">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67468">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67469">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67470">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67471">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67472">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67473">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80949">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87510">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94071">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100632">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="253" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="44">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2e0c07f8713070c07cedfceccd13935e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f963256ba3adedd04d38ff5d4403fc1f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100670">
                    <text>Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy

in a Voluntary Mantel Hospital

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Max

From

Fink,

M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by Grant Me927 of the National

Health Service.
10-8-57

N.Y.

Institute of Mantel Health, U.S. Public

j

M M

3:)

�Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between social

class

and

illness (3, 5, 6,
and

and incidence of mental

psychiatric disorder with respect to type

therapeutic

selection

13, 1h),

outcome (10).

The

and maintenance of treatment (2,

6, 15),

present study is concerned with social

factors in the selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Bollingshead, Redlich and their co—workers
(3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of

classes

New Haven was

divided into five social

basis of weighted criteria of education, occupation

on the

of residence.

Of

the residents

who were under

and place

psychiatric care, those

from

the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while
organic treatment or custodial care
Of

was more common among

the psychotherapies, psychoanalysis

groups.

was

entirely restricted to the

two upper

Social class was the predominant determinant of the type of treatment

selected even
as follows:

when

the diagnosis

"..... it is

found

was

held constant. They summarize their results

that treatment does not

and medical determinants alone, but on the

well.

the lower classes.

depend on psychological

status position of the patient as

degree
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high

to the upper social levels.

The

data of this study

would seem

to indicate that

most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where the background of the patient

is similar to that of the therapist" (15).

It is

possible to relate the results obtained from these

community

studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the

�- 2 -

extent and type of treatment facilities available.

A

more

critical test of the

importance of social factors affecting choice of treatment would be in a setting

therapeutic techniques and services are available to

where the same

This requirement

is

met

all patients.

at Hillside Hospital. It is a non-profit,

sectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with "early
curable mental symptoms" (h),
pay.

are admitted regardless of their

and

ability to

criteria for accepting patients is their "ability to

of the main

One

who

non-

participate profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy

available

is regarded as the

when needed.

primary method of treatment with organic therapies

The average

length of hospital stay

is six

months,

al-

though some patients remain for as long as a year.
The

present investigation is

of electroshock therapy.

an outgrowth of

In previous work

several years of study

it has been

shown

that certain

aspects of personality were significantly related to patient selection and

therapeutic efficacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose

patients differ

of the present study

from those

was

to determine whether electroshock

receiving other forms of treatment in regard to

cultural background, including such factors as education
and

personality as measured by the California

F

and place

of birth,

scale (1); secondly, whether

these factors were also related to referral for adjunctive hoSpital services.

�m:

Population:

as of March 7,

The

1957 was

entire in-patient adult population of Hillside Hbspital

studied. This constituted a total of

ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a

mean

172

of 3h.6, and including

patients,

58 men and

11h women.

1) The population was subdivided

Procedure:

into three groups according

to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy, (b) insulin

coma

therapy,

and (c) psychotherapy only. *

2) The groups were compared for age, education and place

of birth.
I

3)

of the California

naire (see

F

All patients

were

tested

scale suggested by Levinson (9).

Appendix) which has been

The F

scale

The

patient reads ten statements

indicates whether he agrees or disagrees with each statement

tent.

The

and

score given for each item ranges from one to seven and the

score range is

tained.

is a question-

related to such factors as authoritarianism,

acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
and

** with a ten-item.modification

The

10

to 70.

The

to what ex-

total

greater the agreement the higher the score

ob—

statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this
management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data was
included in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subJects.

* All

patients were tested with the F scale
prior to treatment. In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on march 7th their pre-treatment scores were used in the statistical compar-

** As

part of

ison since
treatment.

an ongoing study

all the

EST

it had been found that EST

significantly affects the score during

�-uh) The population was subdivided in regard

of certain adjunctive services in the hospital.

Among

to utilization

such services available

are group

activities, occupational therapy, psychological testing

therapy.

The

latter is a diagnostic

and

and

creative

therapeutic service consisting of a

series of controlled painting procedures which are considered to be analogies
of

life experience (18). Psychological testing

and creative therapy were

selected for this study because both require a specific referral from the

therapist.

�RESULTS:

data

The

1) comparison of the treatment

was analyzed as follows:

scores and place of
groups for age, education, F scale
where diagnosis

is held constant,

prior to treatment,

birth, 2) comparison

significance of length of hospitalization

3)

and h) comparison between groups

referred for adjunctive

hospital services.

I.

Comparison of Treatment Groups:

For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard devia-

-tions for the
Table

I.

F

scale scores,

The EST group had

age and years of schooling are presented in

higher

P

scores,

was

older and had fewer years

of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These

differences
reach

were

statistically significant for

statistical significance for education.

cation to differentiate the groups
electroshock group contained

many

was due,

F

score and age but failed to

The

failure of years of edu-

in part, to the fact that the

foreign born patients whose education

was

treatment groups were subdivided into

difficult to evaluate accurately.

When

number of

eight years of education, the difference

was

patients

above and below

significant at the .01 level.

not differ

statistically for

The

insulin

any of these

and psychotherapy groups did

factors.

�Hague

uwumuom

auom

$5

$5

nMﬁmnom

m
mo

2
$3

Agooav

muwam
awamuom

.nuom

no

modem
m&gt;ﬁuaz

nvuwm

amousm

a

m

m

383

“somv

33$

mm

mﬂ

8

$8

Aﬂoav

no

qmﬁwuom

$8

anon

a

nowpwoscm

um

anon

can

muaam

wkﬁd

.ummm

3me
nuhum

o

nahwm

m

$ﬁ&gt;u%

ma

once

$8

.mw&lt;

H
6m-

.cm

no

auhoom

we

0

b

made»

How

0

8H

$5

Ammv

:5

m

H

.~

m;

w.m

*Réudx

.cm

am

Ho

unmanamua

ma

aonm

mqmdg

masono

a.

$8

Aﬁmmv

mummy

cams

8.3

«a

0.3

H.ma

8;:

m.:

can:

mi

m.mm

3m

am

93

m.ma

9.:

gums

3:

am

p

***om.w

dﬁa

m.w

N.H

a

***mm.a

***ww.m

m:.~

mm.”

H.H

m&gt;.H

pnmnwuhan

mw¢

can:

.33

~.m

o.m

&gt;.:H

mo

nomwnmmsoo

a

**Aa.m

mm.

m&gt;.m

Hm&gt;oﬁ
amped

Hm&gt;ma

no.

do.

«a

pa

pa

pauu««Hanm

aguoﬁqumﬁw

endowmﬁnwam

macaw

m

can:

9.3

9%

m.Hm

ado: .&amp;B

~.m

o.ma

so:

”om“

G3
nonu
naasmnu

9%

Hoe.

uonuhmmanwaamnm

madamnH.amm

nacho

m.m

Rama»
mm

-onohnm.emm

mgauon»

ammumnp

*

**
K

***

�-

-

7

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign born patients

than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group being highest of
Among

the foreign born patients, those

who came from

all.

Eastern European countries

received somatic therapy predominantly, while the majority of those from Western
Europe reneived psychotherapy alone.

II.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation
The

to Diagnosis:

diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable

to those reported in previous studies of the hospital population (12).

Of

the

fl72 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as psychotic depression,
32

as psychoneurosis and two with other diagnoses.

portion of the depressed patients
with other diagnoses.

To

(52%)

As

expected, a larger pro-

received electroshock than did those

control for the factor of diagnosis in choice or

treatment, the psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those
received electroshock and those
are

shown

who

were given psychotherapy alone.

.02

The

results

in Table II.
While the two groups were comparable

shock

who

patients had a

much

level of confidence.

higher

It is

mean F

for

age and education, the

electro-

score, a difference significant at the

also demonstrated that a significantly higher

proportion of the electroshock patients were born in Eastern Europe.

�‘hmavo

aﬁmv

as:

a

a

Agmmv

:83

nunwm

no

nnmpmmm

muonsm

ma

unusuauua

m
#moi

madam

Aﬁmmv

mo

m&gt;apaz

333
u,

whom

ma

NN

mm

mumwa

0903

$8

anoumhuwn

Aaawv.wm
.usdm

no

w
Mo
cwbaoumm

mm
Pm...”

m
Ammmv

mama»
soamm

3?:

u

m

a

NN

3.:

a

p

cams.

m.o~

0.2

am

:.mH

.92

spas

gum:

0.0:

9S

mpnuupdm

am

0a:
HH
.ust

IQ-

mm

mama
noummohmmn

no
uuaow

$03

.MHS

p

canonohmm

mad

omd

mN.o

mmm.

m.ma

{3

m.om

0.3

9602

33.3

v

No.0

*m:.m

muoom

mo

m
can:

502

.935

0N6
Hm&gt;oH

nomuhdmaco

mo.

pa

as

pnwowgﬁamum

namv

3203393
-ongmmm.amm

hmdhmﬁ.

9mm

b

it;

*

�-9.
III.

Comparison of Electroshock

Patients According to Length of Hospitalization

Prior to Treatment:
While the electroshock
from those

receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there

intra-group differences.
postulated that the

To account

While most of the

less than three

months

for

some

were

who

EST

scores and were older were treated
Place of birth

h0%

months were born

earlier than the

is also a significant factor.

cance, although

28%

in the U.S.

The

were

also

compared according

Patients

who had

on

higher

younger and lower F scale
While hh% of those

all patients referred after
data

was

referred after a period

were

III the patients are

within three months were foreign born,

six

it

were placed on treatment

to the period of hospitalization prior to electroshock.

groups.

considerable

of these differences

received

after admission, about
In Table

to differ

patient was referred for electro-

which a given

patients

of three to twelve months.

F

still

shown

factors involved in selection of treatment

same

related to the readiness with
shock.

patients, as a group, have been

education Just

treated

a period of

fails of signifi-

of those treated earlier had less than eight years of

edu—

cation.
IV.

Use

of Adignctive Hospital Services:
Comparison of the

logical testing is

shown

patients referred for creative therapy

in Table

IV.

It is clear that

of these procedures had significantly lower
more education and more were

for these services.

F

and psycho~

those referred for either

scores, were younger_in age, had

native born than patients

who were

not referred

�.350

Agmv

m

Agmmv

nuHHm

cumwmmm

0935

Mo

NH

o

o

haemv

o

m
*ma.m

pamapmmne

madam

0p

“away

Aﬁowv

ma

w

AgooHv

u

m&gt;wuwz

anon

Ha

N

x

nownm

933
Ammuv

Aﬁomv

mm

m

no

m

mo
noﬁpduwawpwmmom

Aaooav

HH

maﬁpwuscm

made»

w

mm.:

0

Agmmv

Agoav

m

H

an

&gt;.m

m.m

o.m

gm:

m.m

».ad

m.mH

333

mo

a

N

x

HHH
nnwan
'0‘"-

no

mqm¢9

on

p

aw.”

mm.o

mm.o

aoavmosu

mama»

cams

mm.H

.Muaa

Hm.a

Po.nw*wm.m
mnwcnoou&lt;

am

m.ma

m.ma

m.oa

30E

m.m;

w.mm

H.om

u

FH.H

Hw.H

mm¢
Hp.m
mpqmwgwm

m~.m

swag».meg

‘

~:.mnwrmw.m

mm

9mm

o.:a

w.HH

a

m.~H

mm.a

mm.a

,

_

macaw

mo

m

new:

H.a:

~.N:

m.mm

mama

.Mqu

m:.m

m~.m

ma.ma

nomwuwmaco

ncwpcuﬁawpunmom

.moa

Hmpmﬂ

mo.

Ho.

pa

96

AHHV

Ammv

angdwha

Hm&gt;oH

Aoﬂv

.mos

:

u

.moa

.woa

.noa

.moa

n

m
mo

nvmumq

m

m

.moa

on

nova

gang

swap

mama

w

m
0p

m

mama

can»

pnaowwﬂnmﬁm

pqaoﬁmﬁnmﬁm

nun»

can»

m
on
mama

m

m
.moa

on
mnoz

mama

mm
.moa

whoa

«nos

m

*

**

�nmnpo

hmmnmna

$8

Away

m

m

Asmav

m

Aamv

m

npuwm

a3

Amwmv

Aﬁmv

cnmpmdm

#

muonsm

m&gt;wpwmuo

A

mo

mm

Aﬁmav

ma
*mm.m

*mm.®

$3

mqwam

cam

hﬁmwv

Agapv

Aﬁmpv

u

u
m&gt;w¢dz

upon

mwﬁpmme

3

a»

ﬂame

Amway

Aapmv

“*pmv

8

mm

my

mm

MN

am

H»

«x

whoa

no
Haowwoaonommm

m

mo

*mm.:

mowpmosum

*mm.m
mndow

m

mo

soamm

:5

Awmav

Aﬁmv

a

A$MHV

n

H

ma

mtm

H.:

Nx

m

«x

ma

&gt;H

p

mwuw&gt;hmm

am

IHHI
mgm¢H

m.m

mm.m

mo

***&gt;.m

m».H

aowpwuscm

mama;

can;

3;

aw

v.0“

«.mH

m.HH

m&gt;ﬁponmmd¢

m.mw**om.:

mm

no“

O.H

h%ﬁ

add

m.ma

5mm

m.mm

m.HH

p

:.ma

mm.m

om¢

o.&gt;
cams.

p.0m

p.»m

mam:

.men

H.oa***mm.m

a

dmunmwmm

am

3:

m.m~

cum:

9mm

p.m:

w.:~

m.ma

r*wm.m

choom

mgqmwpwm

m

H.mm

$.H:

can:

.umﬁn

m.w

m.:a

rm&gt;¢r
amped

Ho&gt;oa

mo
mo. Ho.

:8

pa pa pa

amoavhmanona

Appv

newwnwmabo

3239
mumua

«CC.

Ammv

.a.o
pnmUHuHamHm

pacuHMwumHm

*

**

HQNUﬁMHanm

oz

mmsouo

.Hoaohmm

m&gt;wpmmuo

mummy

:.Honommm

8385

.Honoamm

oz

oz

.a.o

oz

***

�DISCUSSlON:

results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of birth

The

and F

scale score

were

significantly related to the type of therapy received

and

to the utilization of adjunctive services in this hospital.

Psychotherapy was

the treatment of choice for those patients

better educated,

native born

and had lower F scores.

Such

who were younger,

patients

were

also referred

more

frequently for the auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and
creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores,
were

older, poorly educated

were most

likely to

be

and foreign born,

referred for

EST.

particularly in Eastern Europe,

These

patients

infrequently

were

referred for psychological tests or for creative therapy. Furthermore, these
relationships

were

still

significant when diagnosis

was

held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of Hbllingshead, Redlich
and

their co-workers (3, 5, 6, 13,

15) who demonstrated

related to the type of therapy received in a

community.

that social factors are
The

present study

demonstrates that such factors are also significant in a hospital setting where

ability to pay is not a criteria of therapeutic selection and
of therapy are equally available to the
With

financial aspects

and the

where

all

forms

entire population.
availability of therapeutic facilities

eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the selection
of treatment, two alternative interpretations

factors

may

of therapy.

may be

considered.

The

social

relate directly to the empirically established criteria for choice
On

this basis a patient is referred for electroshock because

older, poorly educated or foreign born, clinical experience having

shown

he

that

is

�such persons respond best to
adequate since

13

-

this type of treatment. This explanation is in-

half the patients with psychotic depression received psychotherapy

alone, even though electroshock

is generally considered the treatment of choice

for this illness.
An

alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to

‘choice of treatment because they

also affect certain psychological patterns of

behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy, such as

mode

of

communi-

cation. Thus, a patient is not referred for electroshock because he is foreign
born or poorly educated, but

rather, these factors provide the difference in

cultural background between patient

and

therapist

which makes successful communi»

cation less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship.

Robinson 33 EE' (15)

in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that psychotherapy is
most

likely to take place

where the

cultural background of the patient is similar

to that of the therapist. Conversely, patient-therapist differences in systems
of value and communication may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic rela-

tionship. In the present study, similarly, the patients

who

received psycho-

therapy alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors studied.*
Apart from the problem of

patient-therapist differences, certain patterns

of communication exhibited by the patient may be

intrinsically incompatible with

the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have

score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9.
Sixteen percent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education
was over 20.

* The 18

therapists had a

mean F

�-1ushown

that verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy

and use of cliches are

patterns appear to be

likely to receive electroshock (7, 8).
more frequent

Such language

in persons with poorer socio-cultural back-

grounds.

Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect on

cation patterns,

that,

has noted

may

communi~

also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler (11)
patients diagnosed as schizophrenic, differences in

among

symptoms

are related to differences in cultural background. Frank gg'gl. (2), studying
psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose

symptoms were

expressed

in somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those
mained had

ideational

shock patients (8)

we

In a study of personality factors in electro-

have noted

that certain patterns of symbolic value

The F scale

and

likely to be associated with the development of a
The

indicates that

symptoms

re-

symptoms.

communication were more

depressive psychosis.

who

relationship between communication pattern

symptoms themselves

are a

mode

and

of communication.

furnishes a quantifiable index of attitude and communication

patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers were less receptive to entering a
psychotherapeutic relationship and were more likely to receive electroshock.
Tougas (17), using an

ethocentric scale similar to the

F

scale, found that

psychotherapy was more effective in patients with low scores.

study the

F

scale

was

In the present

the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment

groups.
These

results have clinical as well as theoretical significance.

�-

15

-

Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that lowbscorers on
the

F

scale have a poor response to electroshock,

and

that those with high

F

scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone. Another clinical application
may be

in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient.

This may be done by minimizing

closely for

age and place of

necessity for developing new

their social differences,

by matching them more

birth. 0f possible greater importance is the
modes

of communication when treating patients

who

are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic approaches.*
While epidemiological

studies have clearly structured

some

of the

problems involved in selection of treatment, and have indicated the direction

of further study,

it still remains

for

more process~oriented

definitive answers.

* See Esecover's

presentation of this topic in this issue.

research to provide

�-

16

-

SUMMARY:

1.

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection

of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which

all

forms of therapy were

equally available, education, age, place of birth and score on the California
F

scale were significantly related to the type of therapy received and to the

utilization of adJunctive hospital services.
2. Patients
and were
be

who were

older, poorly educated, had higher

foreign born, particularly in Eastern Europe,

referred for electroshock.

those patients

who most

were most

F

scores

likely to

Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for

closely resembled the therapist in these aspects.
were present even when diagnosis was held

3.

These

relationships

h.

Among

the electroshock patients the

constant.
significant in choice of therapy
which a

patient
5.

was

It is

were

same

factors found to be

also related to the readiness with

referred for electroshock.
postulated that treatment selection is the result of the

communicative interaction between patient and
be important insofar as they are

therapist. Social factors

may

related to different modes of communication.

�-

17

-

REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., FrankeloBrunswik,

(1950):
&amp;

The

E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,

Authoritarian Personality,

New

R.N.

York: Harper

Brothers.

Frank, J.D., Gliedman, L.H., Imber, S.D., Nash, E.H. and Stone, A.R.
(1957):

Why

Neurol.

Am.

Leave Psychotherapy, A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat., 11; 283-299.

&amp;

Freedman, L.Z. and

Patients

Hollingsheadﬁj. (1957): Neurosis

J. Psychiat.,

Hillside Hospital, 29th

113: 769-775.

Annual Report, 1956.

Schizophrenia and Social

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Structure,

Am.

and Social Class,

J. Psychiat.,

110: 695-701.

Social Class and Psychiatric

Ecllingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Disorders, in Interrelations Between the Social Environment
and

Psychiatric Disorders,

New

York:

Milbank MEmorial Fund,

pp. 195-208.
-3

Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

Therapy.
Zubin,

M.

(1957):

Changes

in

Language During Electroshock

In Psychopathology of Communication (Roch, P. and

J. Eds.),

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

New

York: Grune

&amp;

Stratton.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol., in press.
Levinson, D.J.:
10.

Personal Communication.

Morgan, N.C. and Johnson, N.A. (1957):

Chronic Hospital Patient,

Am.

Failures in Psychiatry:

J. Psychiat.,

The

113: 82h-830.

�-18.
REIFEEENCES

ll.

Opler,

Schizophrenia and Culture, Scientific American,

M.K. (1957):

..

191: 103-110.
12.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, 6.8., Gurvitz,
(1956):

ll}.

Redlich, F.C., Hollingshead, A.B., Roberts,

33.,

Robinson, H.A.,

KJ. (1953): Social Structure

and Psychiatric Disorders,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

ﬂ: 729-73h.

Rennie, T.A.C., Srole, L., Opler, M.K. and Langner, T.S. (1957):
Am.

Titus,

Psychiatric Treatment,

Am.

H.E. and Hollander, E.P. (1957):

Tougas, R.R. (19511):

Urban

J. Psxghia‘b” 3.3;: 831-837.

Robinson, H.A., Redlich, F.C. and Myers, J .K. (195M:

Psychological Research:
17.

Rachlin, L.

Freedman, L.Z. and Meyers,

and
16.

A. and

J. Hillside Hospital, 2: 17-40.

1950,

Life and Mental Health,
15.

Lurie,

Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from

Hillside Hospital in
13.

14.,

Social Structure

J. Orthopsychiat., g5: 307-316.
The

California

F Scale

1950—1955, P331301. Bu11.,

Ethnocentrism as

8.

it:

in
147-64.

Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy,

In Psychotheragy and Personality Change, C.R. Rogers and R.F.
Dymond,

18.

Zierer,

E. and

eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. l96-21h.

Zierer,

E. (1956):

of Creative Activity,

Am.

Structure

and Therapeutic

J. Psychotherapy, i3:

Utilization

11833519.

�-

19

-

APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM

Below are a number of statements.

For each statement

we

want you to

give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree. Answer each

statement according to one of the following:

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY

I

AGREE A

I
I

LITTLE

1.

No

MUCH

MUCH

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a

close friend or relation.
2.

Science has

its place,

but there are

many

important things that

must always be beyond human understanding.
3.

If

people would

talk less

and work more, everybody would be

better off.
h.
think about
5.

ation,

When

it,

6.

the youth needs most is

will to

wOrk and

is best for

strict discipline,

fight for family

Nowadays when so many

much, a person has
an

it

him not

to

but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

What

and the

a person has a problem or worry,

rugged determin-

and country.

different kinds of people

mix

together

so

to protect himself especially carefully against catching

infection or disease

from them.

7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more than
mere imprisonment; such

criminals ought to be publicly whipped, or worse.

�-20..
8.

is to

The

best teacher or boss is the

be done and how

9.

the strong.

go about

to get over

them and

tells

us exactly what

it.

Young people sometimes

up they ought

10.

to

one who

get rebellious ideas, but as they

settle

grow

down.

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak and

�Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization. Discharge Ratings. and Diagnosis

ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK. Ph.D..
AND

MAX FINK. M.D.
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry
December 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565—574
Copyright 1959, by American Medical Association

Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings, and Diagnosis
ROBERT L. KAHN,

Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D., and MAX FINK, M.D., Glen Oaks, N.Y.

The increasing studies of the sociopsy—
chological aspects of psychiatric treatment
in recent years have primarily been concerned with treatment patterns in the community,12 private practice,29 and outpatient
clinics.24'2” In the studies reported by
Hollingshead, Redlich, and their co—work—
ers ”'27 it was found that social class was
a major determinant of the type of psy—
chiatric treatment in the New Haven com—
munity. Patients from the upper classes
were more frequently treated with psycho—
therapy, while somatic or custodial care was
commoner among the lower classes. They
summarized their results by noting: “It was
found that treatment does not depend on
psychological and medical determinants
alone, but on the status position of the pa27
well.”
tient as
Weinstock,29 reporting the
results of a poll of the American Psycho—
analytic Association, observed that the pa—
tients being treated by their members in
private practice came disproportionately
from the better—educated, high-income pop—
ulation.
Similar ﬁndings have been noted in
studies of outpatient facilities. Myers and
Schaffer 2" showed that the higher a per—
son’s social class the more likely he was to
be accepted for psychotherapy, treated by
more highly trained personnel, and treated
intensively over a long period of time. In
another study Rosenthal and Frank 28
Submitted for publication April 16, 1959.
From the Department of Experimental Psychia—
try, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by Grants M-927 and MY-2092,
National Institute of Mental Health, National In~
stitutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

found almost a linear relationship between
educational level and frequency of referral
for psychotherapy.
A more critical test of the importance
of sociopsychologic factors in relation to
psychiatric treatment would be in a setting
where the same therapeutic techniques and
services were equally available to all patients. This requirement is met at Hillside
Hospital, which is a nonproﬁt institution for
the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable symptoms,” 11 who are
admitted regardless of their ability to pay.
One of the main criteria for accepting pa—
tients is their “ability to participate proﬁt—
ably in psychotherapy.” 11
Individual
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is
regarded as the primary method of treatment, with physiodynamic therapies available when needed. The average length of
hospital stay is seven months, although
some patients stay for more than a year.
In a previous study of the Hillside Hos—
pital population,“ it was shown that the
factors of age, education, place of birth,
and degree of stereotypy, as measured by
the California F Scale,1 were related to the
selection of therapy. Those patients who
were older, had less education, were
foreign-born, and had high scores on the F
Scale were more likely to receive convulsive
therapy. In contrast, patients who were
younger, better—educated, and native—born
and obtained low scores on the F Scale re—
ceived psychotherapy as their sole form of
treatment.
The purpose of the present study was to
determine the relation of sociopsychological
27/565

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

factors to (1) the duration of hospitaliza—
tion, (2) the clinical evaluations at time of
discharge, and (3) the ﬁnal diagnosis.

Population

Method
Population—The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside Hospital on March 7, 1957, was
studied. This consisted of 171 patients, 57 male and
114 female, ranging in age from 16 to 68 years,
with a mean of 35 years.
Procedura—The patients were divided according

to the duration of hospitalization, clinical response
to treatment, and diagnosis. The duration was de—
termined by the number of complete months in the
hospital. The clinical response and the diagnosis
were determined by the medical director at a staff
evaluation conference, usually held just prior to the
patient’s discharge. Each patient was rated as
recovered, much improved, improved, or unim—
proved on the basis of the reports of the therapist,
supervising psychiatrist, and milieu staff. The
discharge diagnoses were divided into four major
groups: involutional psychosis, manic—depressive
psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychoneurosis. These
diagnostic categories included all but three patients
in the population.
Each patient was tested with a lO—item modiﬁcation of the California F Scale.20 The F
Scale is a questionnaire which has been related to
such factors as authoritarianism, acquiescence,
ethnocentrism, and rigidity.1 The subject reads 10
statements and indicates to what extent he agrees
or disagrees with each, i.e., “a little,” “pretty
much,” or “very much.” The score for each item
ranges from 1 to 7, and the total score range is
10 to 70. High scores indicate greater agreement
with the statements. These are extreme, uncritical,
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one state—
ment is this: “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”

1.

Results
Length of Hospitalization—In this

population the duration of hospitalization
ranged from 1 to 16 months, With a median
of 7 months. For the purpose of analysis,
the population was divided into three
groups: 49 patients who were hospitalized
for 1 to 5 months; 64, for 6 to 9 months,
and 58 for 10 or more months.
The relation of sociopsychological factors
to the length of hospitalization is shown in
Table l. The group of patients who were
hospitalized for the shortest period had
28/566

1.—Dnration of Hospitalization: Total

TABLE

Months in
Hospital

No.

to 5
to 9
or more

49
04
58

1

6
10

F Score.
Mean
43.9

Age,

Mean
Yr.
45.5
32.5
27.9

40.1

31.0

Education.
Mean
Yr.

ForeignBorn

10.0
11.9
12.8

41%
19%
10%

x’=l5.0 I
Moan

Mean

Diﬁ'i r-

Diﬁ‘eiences

Differences

13.0

§

1.9

T

§

ences

to 1‘s.
l to 5 vs.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
1

0

lo

10
10

9

3.4

Mean

or
12.9

§

17.6

§

2.8

9.5

§

4.6

*

0.9

or

P&lt;0.05.
t P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

the highest mean F scores, were oldest, and
had the least education and the largest per—
centage of foreign—born. Conversely, the
group in the hospital for 10 months or more
had the lowest F scores, were youngest, and
had the most education and the smallest
percentage of foreign births. Patients who
were hospitalized for an intermediate period
fell in beLween these two groups for each
of the factors.
When the data for those patients who re—
ceived convulsive therapy (Table 2) and
those who received psychotherapy (Table
.3) as their only form of treatment were
analyzed separately, similar relationships
between sociopsychological factors and
length of hospitalization were found within
each group.
In the psychotherapy group there was an
increase in mean years of education with
greater months of hospitalization, but the
differences fail of signiﬁcance. It may be
noted, however, that many of the patients
who were in the hospital for 10 months or
more were under 19 years of age and were
thus unable to achieve more than a limited
number of years of schooling.
These same relationships of sociopsychological factors to length of hospitalization
were found when the patients were classiVol. 1,

Dec, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

2.—Dnration of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Convnlswe Therapy

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
No. Mean

to 5
6 to 9
10 or more

15

1

to 5 vs.
1 to 5 vs.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
1

“
T

1
§

17
25

to 9
10 or

6

58.2
45.6
34.9

.

Mean
Yr.
51.7
42.2
32.1

Yr.

Born

6.5
12.3
13.2

67%
24%
16%
x2=12.0 I

Mean
Diﬁer-

ences

ences

ences

12.61

9.5 ‘

5.81

1

of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Psychotherapy Only

Education,
Mean
Foreign-

Mean
Diﬁer-

Months in
_

1

6
10

or

§

19.6

§

*

10.1

t

NO-

t0 5
to 9
or more

33
43

6.7

to 5 (is.
to 5 vs.
more
to 9123.
more

1

*

11-4
11.7
12.4

30%
16%
8%

Mean

to 9
10 or
6

1.6
12,4

10

*

Diﬂ‘er-

Differ—

ences

ences

14.1

*

0.3

18.4

*

1.0

or
10.8

Mean

4.3

0.7

.

.
almost
deﬁnlte,
a
hnear, relat1onsh1p be—
tween the ratings of improvement and these
factors. Patients in the recovered group
had the highest F scores, were oldest, least
educated, and showed the highest incidence
of foreign birth. In contrast, patients in
the unimproved group had the lowest F
scores, were younger, better educated, and
were mostly native—born. Because of the
wide variability within each group, however,
only the factor of age reached a level of
statistical signiﬁcance. Education also sig—
niﬁcantly differentiated the groups when
dichotomized according to those who had
less than eight years of education and those
who had eight years or more. Of the re—
covered patients, 29% had less than eight

IS

TABLE

43-2
29.1
24-8

ForeignBorn

P=0.001.

.

ﬁed according to four major diagnostic
groups (Table 4). For each diagnostic
class, the lowest F scores, youngest mean
ages, most years of education, and least
percentages of foreign—born were characteristic of patients hospitalized for the longest
periods. As a group, patients diagnosed
as schizophrenic were the most homoge—
neous in relation to time in the hospital,
showing major differences only in the F
score, without a consistent trend for the
factors of education or place of birth.
2. Results of Treatment—The relation
of sociopsychological factors to evaluation
on discharge is shown in Table 5. There

40-2
38-6
27-8

Differences

0.9

p&lt;omL

Mean
Yr.

Mean

§

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
P&lt;0.01.

F Score,
Mean

Education,
Mean
Yr.

26

Mean
Diﬂer-

6

10.7

HOSDltal

Age,

x’=5.4

1

23.3
10

Age,

TABLE 3.——Dui*a_tion

_

_

4.—Duration of Hospitalization in Patients Classiﬁed According to Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

Involutional psychosis ___________________

1-5

58.2
50.9
35.0

58.8
54.5
52.3

9.6
16.0

40.0
46.1
33.1

46.8
39.1
35.5

11.0
11.7
12.3

39%
23%

40.1
36.6
36.1

41.0
27.1
27.1

8.7
12.5
12.5

50%
19%
13%

36.3
38.5
27.6

27.8
27.8
24.1

13.3
12.3
12.9

10%

‘

6—9

10+
Manic-depressive psychosis

..............

1-5
6-9

10+
Psychoneurosis

...........................

1-5
6—9

10+
Schizophrenia

............................

1-5
6—9

10+

Kahn et al.

Age,

Education,
Mean Yr.
7.1

Foreign-Born
57%
43%
0

0

8%
12%

39/ 567

�M
a?

A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

TABLE

Evaluation

...............................
..........................
................................
.............................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved
Unimproved

5.—Discharge Evaluation

No.
17

82
63
9

F Score,
Mean
42.9
39.0
36.1
31.1

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

44.5
35.6
31.2
31.1

10.7
11.2
11.2
13.2

41%
22%
16%
11 %

x 2=6.1

Mean

Differences

Recovered vs. Much Improved
Recovered vs. Improved
Recovered vs. Unimproved

.............................
....................................
.................................
Much Improved 08. Improved
.............................
Much Improved vs. Unimproved
...........................
Improved vs. Unimproved
.................................

3.9
6.8
11.8
2.9
7.9
5.0

Mean
Differences
8.9 *
13.3 I
13.4

4.4
4.5
0.1

*

T

Mean
Diﬂ'erences
0.5
0.5
2.5
0.0
2.0
2.0

' P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
t P&lt;0.01.
1‘

years’ education, while all of the unimproved
patients had more than eight years’ educa—
tion; the much improved and improved pa—
tients were in between. By X2—analysis
these results were signiﬁcant at the 5%
level of conﬁdence.
When the data were analyzed for the
patients treated with convulsive therapy, the
trends noted for the population as a whole
were intensiﬁed (Table 6). Analysis of the
patients who received psychotherapy as
their only form of treatment (Table 7),
however, failed to show any statistically
signiﬁcant pattern. The recovered patients
were oldest and had the highest percentage
of foreign births, but education and F score
did not show any clear trend.
TABLE

3. Diagnosis.~—The relation of sociopsy-

chological factors to diagnosis is shown in
Table 8. Those patients classiﬁed as show—
ing involutional reactions had the highest
F scores, the oldest mean age, the least
years of education, and the highest inci—
dence of foreign birth. In contrast, pa—
tients classiﬁed as schizophrenic had the
lowest F scores, the youngest mean age, the
most years of education, and the least num—
ber of foreign—born. Patients classed in
manic—depressive psychosis and psycho—
neurosis categories were in between with
regard to these social factors.

Comment
The present study has demonstrated that

sociopsychological

factors, in addition to

6.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving Convnlsive Therapy

Evaluation

N 0.

F Score,
Mean

Recovered _______________________________
Much improved __________________________
Improved and unimproved _______________

8
26
23

53.1
41.8
39.7

Mean
Differences

Recovered vs. much improved ______________________________
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved___________________
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved _____________

11.3
13.4 ‘
2.1

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

51.6
43.8
32.3

9.4
10.6
12.3

Mean

Foreign-Born
50%
35%
17%
x *=3.5

Differences

Mean
Diﬁerences

7.8
19.3 I
11.5 t

1.2
2.9
1.7

*

’ P&lt;0.05.

P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.001.
’r

30/568

Vol. 1,

Dec,

1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE 7.——Discharge

Evaluation in Patients Receiving Psychotherapy Only
F Score,
Mean

N 0.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved and unimproved ...............

54

32-6
38.1

39

33.5

9

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

38.2
32.2
31.9

12.3
12.0
12.2

33%
15%
18%

x '= 1.8
Mean
Differences

..............................
...................
.............

Recovered us. much improved
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved

5.5
0.9
4.6

their previously determined importance in
the selection of treatment, are also signiﬁcantly related to the duration of treatment,
the evaluation of the results of treatment,
and the psychiatric diagnosis. If such results were obtained in a survey of private
practitioners, as in the Weinstock report,29
it could be concluded that the limitation of
the number of practitioners and the expense
of treatment served to select preferred persons from the upper social classes who
could afford the treatment in terms of time
and money. The present results, however,
were obtained in an institution where the
various kinds of'treatment were equally
available to all patients and where the ability
to pay was not a factor in the management
of the patient. We postulate, therefore, that
TABLE

Mean
Differences

Mean

Differences

6.0
6.3
0.3

0.3
0.1
0.2

the observed relationships are not due
merely to mechanically selective aspects,
such as income or the prestige status of the
patient. Social factors are important because they are also related to psychological
processes, such as the habitual patterns of
communication, modes of expression, and
symbolic values. We shall attempt to
evaluate these processes and their effect on
the psychiatric relationships studied in
terms of the inﬂuence of sociopsychological
factors on the attitude and behavior of the
therapist, the patient, and the therapist-patient interaction.
Current data both from this laboratory 14
and from others 12'24’27'28 have demon—
strated that psychotherapy is most likely
to be sustained with those persons who most

8,—Diagnosis

Diagnosis

N 0.

F Score,
Mean

Involutional psychosis ___________________
Manic-Depressive psychosis ______________
Psychoneurosis ___________________________
Schizophrenia ____________________________

24
39
37
68

52.3
40.8
36.9
32.8

Age,

Mean Yr.
56.7
41.9
29.4
26.1

Education,
Mean Yr.
8.9

,

11.5
11.9
12.7

Foreign~Born
46%
26%
22%
10%

x’=14.2 I
Mean

Involutional vs. Manic-depressive psychosis
................
Involutional psychosis vs. psychoneurosis __________________
Involutional as. schizophrenia ______________________________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. psychoneurosis _____________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. schizophrenia_______________
Psychoneurosis vs. schizophrenia ___________________________

Mean

Mean

Differences

Differences

Differences

11.5 I
15.4 I
19.5 §

14.8
27.3

§

30.6

§

3.9
8.0
4.1

12.5
15.8
3.1

§

2.0 ‘
3.0 I
4.5 §
0.4
1.6
0.8

T

§

§

P&lt;0.05.
T P&lt;0.02.
1 P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

Kahn et al

31/569

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

closely resemble the therapists with regard
to cultural' background, systems of value,
and communication patterns. With stress at
Hillside Hospital on psychoanalytically
oriented psychotherapy, it is consistent that
those patients who are most like the
therapists with regard to these factors would
be kept in the hospital for the longest
period. This was true for patients receiving
convulsive therapy or psychotherapy and
for all diagnostic groups.
The length of time a patient remains in
a psychiatric facility is related to the par—
ticular function and philosophy of the insti—
tution. In studies of outpatient clinics
which have a psychoanalytic orientation 24,28
it has been observed that persons from the
higher social classes, determined by educa—
tion or income, are treated for a longer
period. In contrast, in state mental hospitals, patients with the least education are
kept longer and form a higher proportion
of the chronically hospitalized groupfi'l'ﬁ23
The state—hospital therapist, viewing the in—
stitution primarily as a custodial facility,12
is evidently oriented toward the more rapid
discharge of those patients who come from
a background most like his own.
The observation of the relation between
sociopsychological factors and improvement
rating, particularly in those patients receiving convulsive therapy, may also be related
to differences in communication patterns
between therapist and patient that result in
referral for convulsive therapy. The
therapist may set different criteria for im—
provement for theolder, less educated pa—
tients than he does for the younger, more
sophisticated ones. In the patient with littl/
education and with modes of expression
different from his own, he may regard, for
example, the manifestation of denial or
minimization of symptoms as improvement.15 But in patients culturally like him—
self, the expression of denial is regarded
as a defensive operation, and the patient is
considered unimproved.
Ratings of improvement are also related
to the base line of premorbid functioning.
32/570

.

Thus, the rating of recovered is deﬁned at
Hillside Hospital as “the reasonable ex—
pectation that the patient will be able to
return to his community and function as
well, or better, than he did before he became
ill.” 11 The therapist’s perception of the
patient’s premorbid functioning may be inﬂuenced by the distance between his value
system and that of the patient’s. The greater
the social distance between therapist and
patient the less rigorous the requirements
for behavioral change may be. For ex—
ample, for older, lower—class patients the
ability to resume work may be the major
criterion of improvement. For bettereducated patients work adjustment may be
one of many criteria, including such intangible aspects of behavior as insight, work
gratiﬁcation, and ease of sociability. The
patient’s expectancy not only of the type
of psychiatric treatment but of improvement is also dependent upon social back—

ground.12

While the same trends were shown in the
psychotherapy patients, the results did not
reach the level of statistical signiﬁcance.
This may have been due to the greater
homogeneity of these patients for the
factors studied, in contrast to the convul—
sive group. The outpatient study by
Rosenthal and Frank 28 also failed to ﬁnd a
relation between social factors and improve—
ment rating in the patients who received
psychotherapy. This observation, also,
was obtained in a population that was more
homogeneous after the initial admission
selection process and after the spontaneous
screening effected by the patient’s willing—
ness to attend treatment after he had been
accepted.

The marked relationship between socio—
psychological factors and diagnosis is not
surprising. Certainly, the relationship of
age and diagnosis is an established concept
in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional
disorders and in dementia precox the names
themselves have a chronological connota—
tion. Landis and Page,19 in 1938, stated that
age was the “most important single deter—
Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

.

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

mining factor that we can know about men—
tal disease.” They asserted that, given the
age distribution of a group of patients, they
could accurately predict the number in each
diagnostic group, as well as the probable
outcome with respect to recovery and the
length of hospital residence. More recently,
Frumkin,8 reporting the median ages of ﬁrst
admissions to a mental hospital in Ohio,
observed data similar to our own with re—
gard to the ages for the various diagnostic
groups.
In the .present study, however, we have
also shown that education, place of birth,
and F score signiﬁcantly differentiate the
major diagnostic groups in the hospital. In
View of these ﬁndings, we have postulated
that a psychiatric diagnosis is not just a
one—to—one reﬂection of a speciﬁc type of
behavior pattern but is also a value judgment in terms of social interaction. Thus,
both in our own studies and in the work of
12
it has been noted that patients
others
with similar symptoms will receive different
diagnoses, depending on their social background.
An additional hypothesis relating socio~
psychologic factors to diagnosis may be
based on the concept that persons from dif—
ferent social backgrounds acquire different
habitual modes of adaptation, communica—
tion, and expression. Accordingly, under
conditions of stress, altered brain function,
or states associated with the onset of mental
illness, a person will show those behavior
patterns or symptoms which are similar to
his habitual patterns. Thus, persons from a
lower-class social background are more apt
to communicate in nonverbal, physical
terms, while upper—class people are more
likely to do so in ideational and verbal
modes. Thus, anger may be expressed by
lower—class people by physical violence,
while persons from the upper classes are
more likely to resort to exhortation or argu—
ment.
Opler and Singer,25 studying schizo—
phrenic Irish and Italian patients in a
Veteran’s facility, found signiﬁcant difKahn et al.

ferences in the types of symptoms related
to cultural differences in the family backgrounds. Patients from Irish families in
which the active expression of emotions
were frowned upon and who had dominant,
overprotective mothers, were passive, compliant, and withdrawn, and were fearful of
anything which might separate them from
the protection of the hospital. Patients with
Italian family backgrounds that encouraged
free expression of emotion and who were
ruled by a dominant father, showed as—
saultive and destructive behavior, were difﬁ—
cult to manage, and were rebellious against
authority.
In a comparable study, Miller and Swan22 noted
that hospitalized schizophrenic
son
patients exhibited signiﬁcant social—class
difference in symptomatology. Lower-class
patients showed a predominance of “motoric themes,” while middle—class patients
exhibited “conceptual or r u m i n a t i v e
themes.”
Hollingshead and Redlich12 found a
marked difference in the type of neuroses
shown by persons from different social
classes. While hysterical reactions were
found predominantly at the lowest social
levels, obsessive—compulsive patterns were
characteristic of the upper classes. They
felt thatthe lower—class patient expresses
his neurosis by acting out, whereas the
upper—class neurotic shows his symptoms
in ideational dissatisfaction with himself.
According to our hypothesis, then, we
should expect that persons from lower
social levels would show symptoms that are
nonverbal, and are expressed predominantly
in sensory or motor patterns. Among such
types of symptoms Would be psychomotor
retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor,
muteness, hysterical blindness, and paral—
ysis. In this connection it is noteworthy
that both hysteria and manic—depressive
psychosis have been reported on the wane
in the general populatio-n.2v4'8'10 This de—
crease, in our view, is related to the general
increase in educational level of the country
as a whole. One cannot, of course, ascribe
33/571

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom
in sexual matters; hysteria is commonest in
more poorly educated people, who are least
26 has
Rees
inhibited sexually.”6
reported
that those British soldiers who had hysterical symptoms in World War II were mainly
the mental defectives. He noted that
hysterical symptoms were related to intelli—
7
indi—
has
education.
and
Freyhan
gence
cated not only that the present clinical
patterns of hysteria are different from those
shown at the turn of the century but that
such schizophrenic manifestations as “cataleptic stupors, stereotypical motor peculiar—
ities, grandiose excitement, and violent
behavior” are difﬁcult to ﬁnd today. These
observations suggest that a sociopsycho—
logical framework can lead to the prediction
of future patterns of mental illness.
In our investigations of persons with de—
pressive psychoses, we have frequently
noted a pattern of premorbid behavior characterized by lack of imagination, creativity,
and introspective capacity, and by conven—
tionality and general rigidity.13 Similar
patterns have been reported by other
authors.3'5""21 We believe that a deprived
cultural background, such as that involving
little or no education, with the early years
spent in an illiterate environment with
meager cultural resources, is conducive to
the development of such a personality pat—
tern. When mentally disordered, such per—
sons react with the repertoire of behavior
patterns that we term “depression.”
It is important to keep in mind that while
the relationship between social factors and
the psychiatric aspects described is probably
applicable as a general principle, the speciﬁc
ﬁndings may vary in different settings or
institutions. For example, Hollingshead and
Redlich12 found that schizophrenia was a
diagnosis proportionately commoner among
the lower than among the upper classes,
while at Hillside Hospital the schizophrenic
patients had the highest education. This
discrepancy may be related to differences
in composition of the two populations, the
Hillside patients being drawn largely from
34/572

the middle-class groups, with relatively few
from the upper or lower social classes. In
Hillside Hospital the diagnosis of schizo—
phrenia may indicate an “interesting” pa—
tient, while in a state hospital population the
same diagnosis may represent a patient who
is “hopeless.”
From the perspectives developed in this
report, observations which are commonly
explained in motivational and “dynamic”
terms may also be understood in other
ways. Thus, some situations where a pa—
tient is said to be “hostile” or “resisting
psychotherapy” may reﬂect a problem in
communication between patient and ther—
apist, related to their differences in social
background.
It also is apparent that the social back—
ground of the majority of the mentally ill
paients is such as to make the current prac—
tice of universally employing a verbal, in—
sightful-oriented therapeutic approach a
difﬁcult, if not inappropriate, procedure.
The answer to the problem of how to treat
the vast number of mentally ill may be
not to train more and more psychother—
apists, but, rather, to develop therapeutic
techniques more suitable to the patient’s
own systems of value and communication.

Summary and Conclusions
Signiﬁcant relationships were found

be—

tween sociopsychological factors and dura—
tion of hospitalization, discharge evaluation,
and diagnosis in a voluntary mental hos—
pital.
Patients hospitalized for the shortest
period were oldest, had the least education,
were most likely to have been foreign—born,
and had the highest scores on the California
F Scale. Younger, native—born, more edu—
cated, and lower F—score patients were hos—
pitalized the longest.
The same relationship of these factors
to length of hospitalization was found
when analyses were made according to type
of treatment (convulsive therapy or psycho—
therapy) and diagnosis.
Discharge evaluations of improvement
were signiﬁcantly related to age, the older
'

.

Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

patients having the more favorable ratings.
Analysis of the data by type of treatment
demonstrated that patients rated as recovered or much improved after convulsive
therapy had the highest F scores, the least
education, and were most likely to be
foreign-born.
Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psychoneurosis were associated with lower F
scores, younger ages, more education, and
native birth. The older, less educated,
foreign—born, high-F-score patients were
most frequently classiﬁed under involutional or manic—depressive psychosis.
It is postulated that these relationships
reﬂect the inﬂuence of social background on
psychological processes, such as the habitual
patterns of communication, modes of expression, and symbolic values. These not
only contribute to the pattern of mental ill—
ness but affect all aspects of the patient—
therapist interaction.
Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263d St. (Dr. Fink).

REFERENCES
Adorno, T. W.; Frenkel-Brunswik, E.;
Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.: The
Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper &amp;
Brothers, 1950.
2. Arieti, S.: The Decline of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis: Its Signiﬁcance in the Light of Dynamic and Social Psychiatry, paper read at 113th
Annual Meeting of American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, 1957.
3. Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 76 :617-618,
1.

1956.
4. Chodoff,

P.: A Re-examination of Some

Aspects of Conversion Hysteria, Psychiatry 17:
75—81, 1954.

Cohen, M. B.; Baker, R; Cohen, R. A.;
Fromm—Reichmann, F., and Weigert, E.: An Intensive Study of 12 Cases of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiatry 17:103-137, 1954.
S.

H. W., and Meltzer, B. N.:
Predicting Length of Hospitalization of Mental
Patients, Am. J. Sociol. 52:123—131, 1946.
7. Freyhan, F. A.: The Impact of Somatic
Therapies on Course and Clinical Proﬁle of the
Schizophrenias, J. Clin. &amp; Exper. Psychopath. 19:
6.

Dunham,

195-201, 1958.

Frumkin, R. M.: Occupation and Major
Mental Disorders, in Mental Health and Mental
8.

Kahn et al.

Disorder, prepared by a committee of the Society
for Study of Social Problems, edited by A. M.
Rose, New York, W. W. Norton &amp; Company,

Inc., 1955, pp.

136—160.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The
Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Depression, Proceeding 42d Annual Meeting of
American Psychopathological Association, edited
by P. H. Hoch and J. Zubin, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952, pp. 199—209.
10. Harvey, W. A.: Changing Syndrome and
Culture: Recent Studies in Comparative Psychiatry,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat. 2:165—171, 1956.
11. Hillside Hospital: Twenty-Ninth Annual Report, 1956.
12. Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C.:
Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community
Study, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
13. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. Neuropsychiatry, to be published.
14. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
9.

216-228, 1957.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
Psychopathology of Communication, Proceedings
of 46th Annual Meeting of American Psychopathological Association, edited by P. H. Hoch and
J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1958.
16. Kinsey, A. C.; Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin,
C. 13.: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1948.
17. Kramer, M.; Goldstein, 11.; Israel, R. H.,
and Johnson, N. A.: A Historical Study of the
Disposition of First Admissions to a State Mental
Hospital, Public Health Monograph No. 32,
Government Printing Ofﬁce, 1955.
18. Kramer, K.; Pollack, E. S., and Redick,
R. W.; Studies of Incidence and Prevalence of
Hospitalized Mental Disorders in the United
States: Current Status and Future Goals, paper
read at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American
Psychopathological Association, New York, 1959.
19. Landis, C., and Page, J. D.: Modern
Society and Mental Disease, New York, Farrar &amp;
Rinehart, Inc., 1938.
20. Gallagher, E. B.; Levinson, D. J., and
Erlich, I.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics
of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric
Treatment, in The Patient and the Mental Hospital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D. J. Levinson, and
R. H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
21. Malamud, W.; Sands, S. L., and Malamud,
I.: The Involutional Psychoses: A Socio—Psychiatric Study, Psychosom. Med. 3:410—426, 1941.
22. Miller, D. R., and Swanson, G.: Defense
Against Conﬂict and Social Background, paper
15.

35/573

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

read as part of a symposium at the meeting of the
American Psychological Association, September,

Disorder, New York, Milbank Memorial Fund,

1953.
23.

A.; Redlich, F. C., and
Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric

Morgan, N. C., and Johnson, N. A.: Failures
in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient. Am.
J. Psychiat. 113 :824-830, 1957.
24. Myers, J. K., and Schaffer, L.: Social
Stratiﬁcation and Psychiatric Practice: A Study
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev. 19:
307-310, 1954.

25. Opler, M. K., and Singer, J.

L.: Ethnic

in Behavior and Psychopathology,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat 2:11-22, 1956.
26. Rees, J. R.: in discussion on paper by
Gruenberg, E. M., in Epidemiology of Mental
Differences

36/574

1950, pp. 51—52.
27. Robinson,

H.

Treatment, Am. J.

Orthopsychiat.

24:307—316,

1954.
28. Rosenthal, D., and

Frank, J. D.: The Fate
of Psychiatric Clinic Outpatients Assigned to
Psychotherapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 127 :330343, 1958.
29. Weinstock, H. 1.:

Report of the Central
Fact—Gathering Committee of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, paper read at the 48th
Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathological Association, New York, 1958.

Prénted and Published in the United States of America

��J. Hillside Hospital, 6:

216-228, 1957.

SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF
THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL
HOSPITAL1
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,2 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between
social class and psychiatric disorder with respect to type and incidence of mental illness (3, 5, 6, l3, l4), selection and maintenance of
treatment (2, 6, 15), and therapeutic outcome (10). The present
study is concerned with social factors in the selection of therapy in

voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich, and their coworkers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of New Haven was divided
into ﬁve social classes on the basis of weighted criteria of education,
occupation and place of residence. Of the residents who were under
psychiatric care, those from the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or
custodial care was more common among the lower classes. Of the
psychotherapies, psychoanalysis was entirely restricted to the two
upper groups. Social class was the predominant determinant of the
type of treatment selected even when the diagnosis was held constant. They summarize their results as follows: ". . . it is found that
treatment does not depend on psychological and medical determinants alone, but on the status position of the patient as well.
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high
a

1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. 8.
Public Health Service.
2Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital.
3Scnior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
4 Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
‘

216

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

217

‘

degree to the upper social levels. The data of this study would seem
to indicate that most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where
the background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist" (15).
It is possible to relate the results obtained from these community studies to such selective factors as the patient’s ﬁnancial resources or the extent and type of treatment facilities available. A
more critical test of the importance of social factors affecting choice
of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients.
This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital. It is a nonproﬁt,

k,

h

.

....-_.._...-.,...v.....

nonsectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental symptoms" (4), who are admitted regardless of their ability to pay. One of the main criteria for accepting patients is their “ability to participate proﬁtably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with organic therapies
available when needed. The average length of hospital stay is six
months, although some patients remain for as long as a year.
The present investigation is an outgrowth of several years of
study of electroshock therapy. In previous work it has been shown
that certain aspects of personality were signiﬁcantly related to patient selection and therapeutic efﬁcacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
electroshock patients differ from those receiving other forms of
treatment in, regard to cultural background, including such factors
as education and place of birth, and personality as measured by the
California F scale (1); secondly, whether these factors were also
related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.

mum

METHOD

Population: The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside
Hospital as of March 7, 1957 was studied. This constituted a total
of 172 patients, ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a mean of 34.6,
and including 58 men and 114 women.
Procedure: (1) The population was subdivided into three groups,
according to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy,
(b) insulin coma therapy, and (c) psychotherapy only.‘5
5All patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during ’hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data were included
in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

....

“.4.

na.

._‘....-..—._4.,_....—««...

.

gbnyw.

C)

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

218
(2)

birth.

The groups were compared for age, education and place of

(3) All patients were tested6 with a ten-item modiﬁcation of the
California F scale suggested by Levinson (9). The F scale is a questionnaire (see Appendix) which has been related to such factors as
authoritarianism, acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
The patient reads ten statements and indicates whether he agrees
or disagrees with each statement and to what extent. The score given
for each item ranges from one to seven and the total score range is
10 to 70. The greater the agreement the higher the score obtained.
The statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

(4) The population was subdivided in regard to utilization of
certain adjunctive services in the hospital. Among such services
available are group activities, occupational therapy, psychological
testing and creative therapy. The latter is a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a series of controlled painting procedures
which are considered to be analogies of life experience (18). Psychological testing and creative therapy were selected for this study because both require a speciﬁc referral from the therapist.
RESULTS

The data were analyzed as follows: (1) comparison of the treatment groups for age, education, F scale scores, and place of birth;
(2) comparison where diagnosis is held constant; (3) signiﬁcance of
length of hospitalization prior to treatment; and (4) comparison
between groups referred for adjunctive hospital services.
Comparison of Treatment Groups
For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard
deviations for the F scale scores, age and years of schooling are
presented in Table l. The EST group had higher F scores, was
older and had fewer years of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These differences were statistically
signiﬁcant for F score and age but failed to reach statistical signiﬁcance for education. The failure of years of education to differentiate the groups was due, in part, to the fact that the electroshock
1.

6As part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F
In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on March 7 their pretreatment scores were used in the statistical comparison
since it had been found that EST signiﬁcantly affects the score during treatment.
scale prior to treatment.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.850

:wmuuom

Eon

$5“

82m
39.7114?

$.32

o

ammokoh

we

219

55

..ﬁ.:namo

cwMuSh

.ummmﬁuom

omen”.—

ﬁamr:

$.85“

$83

:25
.PEaZ

x0
3::
3::

Eom

$.8va

$532

ﬁvawm

55m

mo

.minamo

82m

-ﬁmuuoh

Eon

@EE

$3“

ﬁmmIv

$.32

Agar:

:otugﬁm

985

.me

.3—

$.8va

now

.«o

0

.Ssnamo

.Eeum
988w

ﬂ
”55H.

K

$5; ax?

3?:

Gm

3. ea

mm

532

2: 2:

qﬁ

wzoﬁom

‘8.“

$336

6m

mow—mo?

“2253‘;

a
532

.59

...23

3

2,

N.—

o
o

.
~23»me

«I

m5.—

Gm

q:

3

2;.

n:

gm

3”

a

:32.
.8.”

mi

ed

3

ow&lt;

x0

532

:82

a5

n:

a
a

tantamwﬁcc

Gm

92

”.2

a:

mi.

3»

3m

.

:2.»

tmhd

£5
E2 BE

3::

38mm

532

:82

.En

3:

3

hm

any

.3.

8.

So.

a

an

3

38%?2.85:»; Esscma
.o&amp;u&gt;m&amp;.::=n=—

aozéemﬁ

335-5“

585-98—

-OH—U
smvhmm

$5.19

r7305

.53.:

uh

.382:

.

..

2..

�220

KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

group contained many foreign-born patients whose education was
difﬁcult to evaluate accurately. When treatment groups were subdivided into number of patients above and below eight years of
education, the difference was signiﬁcant at the .01 level. The insulin and psychotherapy groups did not differ statistically for any
of these factors.

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign-born
patients than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group
being highest of all. Among the foreign-born patients, those who
came from Eastern European countries received somatic therapy
predominantly, while the majority of those from Western Europe
received psychotherapy alone.
Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis
The diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable to those reported in previous studies of the hospital popution (12). Of the 172 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as
psychotic depression, 32 as psychoneurosis and 2 with other diagnoses. As expected, a larger proportion of the depressed patients
(52%) received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.
To control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the
psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those who received electroshock and those who were given psychotherapy alone.
The results are shown in Table 2.
While the two groups were comparable for age and education,
the electroshock patients had a much higher mean F score, a difference signiﬁcant at the .02 level of conﬁdence. It is also demonstrated
that a signiﬁcantly higher proportion of the electroshock patients
were born in Eastern Europe.

2.

Comparison of Electroshock Patients According to Length of
Hospitalization Prior to Treatment
While the electroshock patients, as a group, have been shown to
differ from those receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there were still
considerable intragroup differences. To account for some of these
differences it was postulated that the same factors involved in selection of treatment were also related to the readiness with which a
given patient was referred for electroshock. While most of the patients who received EST were placed on treatment less than three
months after admission, about 40 per cent were referred after a
period of three to twelve months. In Table 3 the patients are compared according to the period of hospitalization prior to electro3.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.550

$.23.

ax”:

5.3m

538mm
jigli‘l

EuEEEh

we

“Egan

$53”

«Rana—

.Sauamu

REE

Kc
.0332 50m

§$§

$53“

EOENN

§£Vmw

awash

208
39$me

a;

How

no
con—8.6m

938»
name
Bwamwunﬁ

exam;

15.3.

Gm

3.

3

532

3:

3:

Gm

wﬁ

n2

:32

3:.

9:.

Ga

3:

«.2

h :32

new

q:

wzogum

0:3

N
.vm

38C.
somnuﬁﬁum

we
mama?

:32

.

86

£5

85

utoﬁbﬁ

5.3»

a

mud

ow&lt;
582

a3

and

3:»..qu

kc

.

é.“

38m

:ontﬁwEoU

:32

ea

BE
3m

8.

«liq.

a
$6

.
‘
.

:3

Hammama
.oﬁrmémm

-onuwnm

ha.

,

.

2!!!!)

..

,

‘

W

7

832:

.

,1"

w

322:

,

221

�KAHN—POLLACK—FIN K

222

.,
.550

@va

c

o
sin

uo

.£6

.
33mg

583m uncuzm

$53

m

o

$53

ﬁgs:

a

:

Mano

cum—m
2.25355

-0322 50m

3

@932

3.2%
308

$.83
$5me

:

mm

new

“o
:otuggxwmom

QUE

:oumusvm

wweﬂamo

“26&gt;

w
Aﬁwua

32::

c

3015

kc
m
Ewnud

45

55H.

S

a

85

:2

85

£5

a:

8....

a;

9

:4

:3.”

3»

:82 .En

E...“

2.2

N:

ms:

a

8;

:3.“

5*

3...

Gm

5..

am

3..

38&gt; 582

am

hi

3.;

Gm

3:

mﬁ

2:

532

93

mg

Gm

q:

582

2:.

mo
can:

mEEouuV

Szuzcm

8..

uw&lt;

:3

Sam

\0

.

m3

38m

zowtuiEeU

h
mo

as

3

.88

him
-mNSSEmo:

52:

Susannah.

sum—SA

€3.88...

no:

4 w.

$04

,w

‘

8

e5

$6
kwoa

:2:

o

m

532

c:

m
Gan—u

.85
0.82

c

33

o2

2.2

e

2

»

.22

me.

8.

aa

-608

.88

~22

m
Ema—u

30..—

288

:2:

308

.85.

3

n

285:? 385:”;

52:

o

308

88¢

.

2.
.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

223

Shock. Patients who had higher F scores and were older were treated
earlier than the younger and lower F scale groups. Place of birth is
also a signiﬁcant factor. \Vhile 44 per cent of those treated within
three months were foreign-born, all patients referred after a period
of six months were born in the U. S. The data on education just
fails of signiﬁcance, although 28 per cent of those treated earlier
had less than eight years of education.

.,,.

,,

.

mug-r;

Adjunctive Hospital Services
Comparison of the patients referred for creative therapy and
psychological testing is shown in Table 4. It is clear that those referred for either of these procedures had Signiﬁcantly lower F scores,
were younger in age, had more education and more were nativeborn than patients who were not referred for these services.

4. Use of

DISCUSSION

..

"155'

.

,

The results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of
birth, and F scale score were signiﬁcantly related to the type of
therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive services‘ in this
hospital. Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for those patients who were younger, better educated, native-born and had lower
F scores. Such patients were also referred more frequently for the
auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores, were
older, poorly educated and foreign-born, particularly in Eastern
Europe, were most likely to be referred for EST. These patients
were infrequently referred for psychological tests or for creative
therapy. Furthermore, these relationships were still signiﬁcant when
diagnosis was held constant.
These observations are compatible with those of Hollingshead,
Redlich, and their co-workers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15) who demonstrated that
social factors are related to the type of therapy received in a community. The present study demonstrates that such factors are also
signiﬁcant in a hospital setting where ability to pay is not a criterion
of therapeutic selection and where all forms of therapy are equally
available to the entire population.
With ﬁnancial aspects and the availability of therapeutic facilities eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the
selection of treatment, two alternative interpretations maybe considered. The social factors may relate directly to the empirically
established criteria for choice of therapy. On this basis a patient is

'

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

224

.850

ﬁn“;

$me

Amwutch

35:30

533mm

«@055

A03:

Aﬁmwvmw

H

1%:

35:2

@33

@3:

@8va

§§8

.mwmuamo

«50

853

.25“

«:8

$63

.23

2:5

go

ARE;

50m

aways

$95:

$.38

138%

Z

MFGSK.

805

1%»

3w

.uo

H

~838va
PﬁmSaﬁbﬁ

.Nmenamu

mud“;

«Eu

3?:

$.27:

33“ $.32

Gm

ﬂ.

3

a.»

38&gt; 582

3:

2:

3“ N:

mic—om

kc

v
8.938%

.Um

35?

we

8.“

:82

a

octhd

£5

QN

m5

3

,

uptuzzbuv.

.

.Sx

2:

we

a:

E:

532

SN

3».

5.8

5.3

Gm

2:

”.2

a: 2:

3w

5.3

3»

ASV

32v

Gm

.tnowJ.

....ewm

"A:

S.

vw&lt;
Vutﬁwm

:8:

.

2:».zum

Kc

a5

tooomd

:8.”
~22

3,2

no.

8.

38m

h

582
532

£5
Nﬁu

«.3.

2

:32

so.

a3a

:oﬂuEwEoU

st

333.5

3380
u&gt;tmuu0

332:.

REEF

oz

285:?“

285:»;

..H..U
.._oau&gt;mm

.355
38.“.

Saucmcmmm

.355

Amaze...

oz

uhu

OZ

0z

.

.3

2.

�,amr»:

.

“

‘

..

SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

225

,

..

new...

4..

,wu

referred for electroshock because he is older, poorly educated or
foreign-born, clinical experience having shown that such persons
respond best to this type of treatment. This explanation is inadequate since half the patients with psychotic depression received
psychotherapy alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice for this illness.
An alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to
choice of treatment because they also affect certain psychological
patterns of behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy,
such as mode of communication. Thus, a patient is not referred for
electroshock because he is foreign-born or poorly educated, but
rather these factors provide the difference in cultural background
between patient and therapist which makes successful communication less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Robinson et al.
(15), in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that
psychotherapy is most likely to take place where the cultural background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist. Conversely,
patient-therapist differences in systems of value and communication
may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. In the
present study, similarly, the patients who received psychotherapy
alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors

studied.7

.

Apart from the problem of patient-therapist differences, certain
patterns of communication exhibited by the patient may be intrinsically incompatible with the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have shown that
verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy and use of cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8). Such
language patterns appear to be more frequent in persons with
poorer sociocultural backgrounds.
Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect on communication patterns, may also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler (11) has noted that, among patients diagnosed as
schizophrenic, differences in symptoms are related to differences in
cultural background. Frank et a1. (2), studying psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose symptoms were expressed in
somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those,
who remained had ideational symptoms. In a study of personality
7 The 18 therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and
a mean age of 33.9. Sixteen
per cent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education was over

20.

,
.vr"

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

226

factors‘in electroshock patients (8) we have noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and communication were more likely to be
associated with the development of a depressive psychosis. The relationship between communication pattern and symptoms indicates
that symptoms themselves are a mode of communication.
The F scale furnishes a quantiﬁable index of attitude and communication patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a
mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers
were less receptive to entering a psychotherapeutic relationship and
were more likely to receive electroshock. Tougas (17), using an
etlmocentric scale similar to the F scale, found that psychotherapy
was more effective in patients with low scores. In the present study
the F scale was the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment groups.
These results have clinical as well as theoretical signiﬁcance.
Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that lowscorers on the F scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that
those with high F scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone.
Another clinical application may be in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient. This may be done by
minimizing their social differences, by matching them more closely
for age and place of birth. Of possible greater importance is the
necessity for developing new modes of communication when treating
patients who are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic ap1

proaches.

While epidemiological studies have clearly structured some of the
problems involved in selection of treatment,‘and have indicated
the direction of further. study, it still remains for more processoriented research to provide deﬁnitive answers.
SUMMARY

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which all forms of
therapy were equally available, education, age, place of birth, and
score on the California F scale were signiﬁcantly related to the type
of therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive hospital
1.

servrces.

’

Patients who were older, poorly educated, had higher F scores
and were foreign-born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most
likely to be referred for electroshock. Psychotherapy was the treat2.

�.

.
p

*Wﬂg
g

“A

4““
..

)WA-W.~»‘,.I_~HWW‘W«

"r
.t.

SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

227

ment of choice for those patients who most closely resembled the
therapist in these aspects.
3. These relationships were present even when diagnosis 'was
held constant.
4. Among the electroshock patients the same factors found to be
signiﬁcant in choice of therapy were also related to the readiness
With which a patient was referred for electroshock.
5. It is postulated that treatment selection is the result of the
communicative interaction between patient and therapist. Social
factors may be important in so far as they are related to different
modes of communication.
APPENDIX

“Wadwﬂ

a

F SCALE FORM

.

Below are a number of statements. For each statement we want
you to give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree. Answer each statement according to one of the following:
I AGREE A LITTLE
I AGREE PRETTY MUCH
I AGREE VERY MUCH

3),."

glue»:

‘.

1. No sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation.
2. Science has its place, but there are many important things
that must always be beyond human understanding.
3. If people would talk less and work more, everybody would be

better off.
4. When a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not
think
about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.
to
5. What the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determination, and the will to work and ﬁght for family and country.
6. Nowadays when so many different kinds of people mix together so much, a person has to protect himself especially carefully
against catching an infection or disease from them.
7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.
8. The best teacher or boss is the one who tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to go about it.
9. Young people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down.‘
.

\4

I DISAGREE A LITTLE
I DISAGREE PRETTY MUCH
I DISAGREE VERY MUCH

�\‘
KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

228

People can be divided into two distinct classes: the weak
the
and
strong.
10.

REFERENCES
(1)
(2)

(3)
(4)
(5)
(5)

(7)

Adorno, T. W.; Frenkcl-Brunswik, E.; Levinson, D. J. 8c Sanford, R. N.:
The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper 8.: Brothers, 1950.
Frank, J. D.; Gliedman, L. H.; Imber, S. D.; Nash, E. H. 8: Stone, A. R.:
Why Patients Leave Psychotherapy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (9' Psychiat., 77:

283-299, 1957.
Freedman, L. Z. 8: Hollingshead, A. B.; Neurosis and Social Class. Am. J.
Psychiat., 113:769-775, 1957.
Hillside Hospital: 29th Annual Report, 1956.
Hollingshead, A. B. 8: Redlich, F. C.; Schizophrenia and Social Structure.
Am. ]. Psychiat., 1102695-701, 1954.
Hollingshead, A. B. Fe Redlich, F. C.: Social Class and Psychiatric Disorders.
In: Interrelations Between the Social Environment and Psychiatric Disorders. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, pp. 195-208, 1954.
Kalm, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
In: Psychopathology of Communication, ed. P. Hoch 8: J. Zubin. New York:

Grune 8: Stratton, 1957.
Kahn, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to
Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neural. (in press).
(9) Levinson, D. J.: Personal Communication.
(10) Morgan, N. C. 8.: Johnson, N. A.: Failures in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:824-830, 1957.
(11) Opler, M. R.: Schizophrenia and Culture. Scientiﬁc American, 197:103-110,
-

(8)

1957.

Rachlin, H. L.; Goldman, G. S.; Gurvitz, M.; Lurie, A. 8: Rachlin, L.:
Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from Hillside Hospital in 1950.
This Journal, 5:17-40, 1956.
(13) Rcdlich, F. C.; Hollingshcad, A. B.; Roberts, B. H.; Robinson, H. A.:
Freedman, L. Z. 8c Meyers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Disorders.
Am. ]. Psychiat., [09:729-734, 1953.
(14) Rennie, T. A. C.; Srolc, L.; Opler, M. K. 8: Langner, T. 8.: Urban Life and
Mental Health. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:831-837, 1957.
(15) Robinson, H. A.: Redlich, F. C. 8: Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Treatment. Am. ]. Orthopsychiat., 24:307-316, 1954.
(15) Titus, H. E. 8c Hollander, E. P.: The California F Scale in Psychological
Research: 1950-1955. Psychol. Bull., 54:47-64, 1957.
(17) Tougas, R. R.: Ethnocentrism as a Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy. In:
Psychotherapy and Personality Change, ed. C. R. Rogers 8: R. F. Dymond.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 196-214, 1954.
(13) Zierer, E. 8: Zierer, E.: Structure and Therapeutic Utilization of Creative
Activity. Am. ]. Psychother., 10:481-519. 1956.
(12)

.

�Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy
in a Voluntary Mantal Hospital

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Max Fink, M.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National
Health Service.
10-8-57

Institute of mental Health,

U.S. Public

N.Y¢

�Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between social

class

and

psychiatric disorder with respect to type

illness (3, 5, 6,
and

therapeutic

and incidence of mental

selection and.maintenance of treatment (2, 6, 15),

13, 1h),

outcome (10).

The

present study is concerned with social

factors in the selection of therapy in.a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich and

(3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of

classes

on the

of residence.

New Haven was

their co-workers

divided into five social

basis of weighted criteria of education, occupation
Of

the residents

who

were under

and place

psychiatric care, those

from

the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while
organic treatment or custodial care
Of

was more common among

the psychotherapies, psychoanalysis

groups.

Social class

selected even
as follows:

when
"

was

was

held constant.

They summarize

is found that treatment does not

and medical determinants alone, but on the

well.

entirely restricted to the

two upper

the predominant determinant of the type of treatment

the diagnosis

..... it

was

the lower classes.

their results

depend on psychological

status position of the patient as

Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high degree

to the upper social levels.

The

data of this study would

most psychotherapy takes place in a

setting

seem

to indicate that

where the background of the

patient

is similar to that of the therapist" (15).

It is

possible to relate the results obtained from these

community

studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the

�extent

and type of treatment

facilities available.

A

more

critical test of the

importance of social factors affecting choice of treatment would be in a setting
where the same

therapeutic techniques

This requirement

is

met

and services are

available to

all patients.

at Hillside HoSpital. It is a non-profit,

sectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with "early
curable mental symptoms" (h),
pay.

of the main

One

who

non—

and

are admitted regardless of their ability to

criteria for accepting patients is their "ability to

participate profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy

available

is regarded as the primary

when needed.

The average

method of treatment with organic

therapies

length of hospital stay is six months, al-

though some patients remain for as long as a year.
The

present investigation is

of electroshock therapy.

an outgrowth of several years of study

In previous work

it

has been shown

that certain

aspects of personality were significantly related to patient selection and

therapeutic efficacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose

patients differ

of the present study

was

to determine whether electroshock

from those receiving other forms of treatment in regard

cultural background, including_such factors as education
and

personality as measured

by the

California

F

and place of

to

birth,

scale (1); secondly, whether

these factors were also related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.

�Mame:
Population:
as of March 7,

16

entire in-patient adult population of Hillside Hospital

studied.

1957 was

ranging in age from

llh

The

This constituted a

to 68 with a

mean

total of

172

of 3h.6, and including

patients,

58 men and

women.

Procedure:

1) The

population

was

subdivided into three groups according

to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy, (b) insulin

coma

therapy,

and (c) psychotherapy only. *

2) The groups were compared for age, education and place

of birth.
3)

of the California

naire (see

F

All patients

were

tested

scale suggested by Levinson (9).

Appendix) which has been

indicates whether

tent.

The

scale

is a question-

The

patient reads ten statements

he agrees or disagrees with each statement and

to

what ex-

score given for each item ranges from one to seven and the total

score range is

tained.

The F

related to such factors as authoritarianism,

acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
and

** with a ten-item modification

The

10

to 70.

The

greater the agreement the higher the score

obs

statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this
management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data was
included in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

* All

part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F scale
prior to treatment. In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on march 7th their pre-treatment scores were used in the statistical comparison since it had been found that EST significantly affects the score during

** As

treatment.

�- h h) The population was subdivided in regard to

of certain adjunctive services in the hospital.

Among

such services available

are group

activities, occupational therapy, psychological testing

therapy.

The

latter is

and

be analogies

life experience (18). Psychological testing and creative therapy

selected for this study because both require a specific referral

therapist.

creative

a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a

series of controlled painting procedures which are considered to
of

utilization

were

from the

�RESULTS:

data

The

was analyzed

as follows:

1) comparison of the treatment

groups for age, education, F scale scores and place of
where diagnosis

is held constant,

prior to treatment,

birth, 2) comparison

significance of length of hospitalization

3)

and h) comparison between groups

referred for adjunctive

hospital services.
I.

Comparison of Treatment Groups:

For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard devia—

tions for the
Table

I.

F

scale scores, age and years of schooling are presented in

The EST group had

higher

F

scores,

was

older and had fewer years

of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups.

differences
reach

were

statistically significant for

statistical significance for education.

cation to differentiate the groups
electroshock group contained

many

was due,

F

These

score and age but failed to

The

failure of years of edu-

in part, to the fact that the

foreign born patients whose education

was

difficult to evaluate accurately.

When

number of

eight years of education, the difference

was

patients

above and below

significant at the .01 level.

not differ

statistically for

The

treatment groups were subdivided into

insulin

any of these

and psychotherapy groups did

factors.

�***

**

ﬁg

*

$3qu

dumumww

33mg.
menwmwowOa

mmwnwOu

macaw

mmeanmcpwn

Humcﬁuamov

Hamcwwuawmwoan

mnmunHnmUd

md

.oow

mumbwwwomsw

309

mwmuwwwomud

ma

ma

.OH

.ow

38

w.w

ma

Hw.o

83..

Emma

wrm

ﬂaw

ES.

Emma

w
macaw

Hm&lt;ww

ooavaHmOd

Hm&lt;mw

Hm&lt;mw

.mm

whw
w.ww**

ﬁrm

a

5:0.

55

mu

ow
.msa

mb

H:.&lt;

9%.

saws

wma

35

5....“

Emma

pmm
wawmumba

P.4m
r.mm**+

d

m.w

92..

EL

mu

Fm

:78

Pmmiiw.»

H.H

w.:m

fmm
m.wo**x

a
xm"

Emma

“Po

Wm

5L

Pm

Emma

8.0m

ammum

aummwﬁmuw

0%

Fe

mu
mm.
mwocvm

:

2%

m

prbw
wow

wwwos

ESE

Ems

.70.?

pom

E.

m

xmmum

w

m

ow

macaw.

on

Hmeé

ma.

8%

Gm§

pmm.
Scam

5

xv."
53$

macomdwou
moumumb

wwmom

moan

Si:
.39.
mm

3

Gwé

8&amp;3

m

5

mﬁow‘ngmamoé

ow
mum

wwwau

wows

xmu

zwdH&lt;m

wwmom

ow
moan.
mcwoww
wowmums

3%

mﬁooé

mwmnm

333
mmma.

Pd:

wuwﬁw

5

o

ow

m
wonmumu

Smﬁ

3%

wean

woumumu

Carma

wwwdw

H

�f 7

'

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign born patients

than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group being highest of
Among

the foreign born patients, those

who came

all.

countries

from Eastern European

received somatic therapy predominantly, while the majority of those from Western
Europe received psychotherapy alone.

II.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis:
The

diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable

to those reported in previous studies of the heapital population (12).
172
32

patients,

as psychoneurosis and two with other diagnoses.

with other diagnoses.

To

(52%)

As

expected, a larger pro-

received electroshock than did those

control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of

treatment, the psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those
received electroshock and those
shown

who

were given psychotherapy alone.

.02

The

who

results

in Table II.
While the two groups were comparable

shock

the

78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as psychotic depression,

portion of the depressed patients

are

Of

patients

for

age and education, the

electro-

had a much higher mean F score, a

difference significant at the

It is also

that a significantly higher

level of confidence.

demonstrated

proportion of the electroshock patients were born in Eastern Europe.

�*

mug
$0.33
mmHImeoUOI

wﬁduogmumg

$5

mHmUManmﬁw

$8

ma

.Om
ooswmuwmom

Hm&lt;mw

9mm

waw.

Emma

5.0

8Q

Emma

w

ow

mnoum

m}?

9mm

a
maﬁa.

5.:

2mmb

ab

5.m

55

Sh

”5.:

mu

mmdwmmdm

Emma

audr

mmm

0.8

0.8

9%

a
cwmw.

ma
wmwaUOdwo

Emma

a

8.0

Hob

9m

fr

Emma
MmmHm

ow
unmammmwos

prﬁm

mu
Waco.

xm
u

:

w

2:3

3&amp;3

HH

:30
waves
«mmum

m

H.mu

mmomu&lt;ma

0%

m

mm

0H

8253

@050.

25%

Uumwmnmua

Beam

vamm

xm
u

mm

pm

Smé

383

wowu

wwmom

#.0w

*

0%

zmaw&lt;m

w

pm

Hammaamsa

mcwovm
mmmdmun

30,3

ow

3me
wwudw

p

H

3&amp;3

GE

oawmw

�- 9 -

III.

Comparison of Electroshock

Patients According to Length of Hospitalization

Prior to Treatment:
While the electroshock
from those

receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there

intra-group differences.

postulated that the

same

To account

While most of the

less than three

months

for

some

have been shown
were

patients

who

received

after admission, about

EST

h0%

was

to differ

considerable

of these differences

patient

which a given

of three to twelve months. In Table

it

was

were also

referred for electro—

were placed on treatment

were

referred after a period

III the patients are

to the period of hospitalization prior to electroshock.
F

still

factors involved in selection of treatment

related to the readiness with
shock.

patients, as a group,

compared according

Patients

who

had higher

scores and were older were treated earlier than the younger and lower

groups.

Place of birth is also a significant factor.

within three months were foreign born,

six

months were born

cance, although

28%

in the

U.S.

The

While hh% of those

all patients referred after
data

education just

on

F

fails

scale

treated

a period of
of

signifi-

of those treated earlier had less than eight years of

edu—

cation.
IV.

Use of Adjunctive

Hospital Services:

Comparison of the

logical testing is

shown

patients referred for creative therapy

in Table

IV.

It is

of these procedures had significantly lower

clear that those referred for either
F

more education and more were native born than

for these services.

and psycho-

scores, were younger in age, had

patients

who were

not referred

�**

*

w
Beam

Bowm

bmmm

ﬁo

m
Em:

«was

dams

mumuwwwomba

m

3

w

Hmmm

308m

m

ma

mw

w

0

gem.

Bow.

Bow.

80m.

o

n

ma

Hm&lt;mw

mHMou
bmmmaw

do

38.

ow

w
$8

38.

awwmdamua

momvwdmwwumawon

32

“Hwy
.OH

5%

arms

wsmu

u
Bow.

3

m

dumb

38.

80m.
mwmbHWHomUd

w

.Om

Hm&lt;mw
ooswmwwmos

m.4m

3.5

95

Emma

UH%H.

ww.m

5.4

SL

Ewan

w
ow
macaw

Ema

H.Mm

H4.w

d

Fm

tro

ww.m

Sam

mme

mu

m.mm**.wm.5

mu}

$.4H

Tme

UMWﬁ.

wo.H

.zmmu

mmwwmbam

bmm

v.5

H.mw

d

Ho.w

Hm.“

53

mu
&gt;ooowawum

wamxwmbu

v.8

H.mw

UHHH.

Kama

Hm.m

ﬂ;

mb

Emma

Mmmwm

ao

mocnmawou

o.wm

PS

0.3

ebwﬁw

om

d

m.o

Pm

“.4

mb

u

Ho
Hammaw

HHH

N

m

H

H

0

m

ow
waves

323

333

m

:.mm

ammwm

manomdwoa

HP

AHOO$V

m

mw

60ch

SR3

momvwdmwwnmawou

m

ow

on

Baum

wHHow

xm

PH

n
AHOO$V

a

Hm

393

3&amp;3

wows

do

zmdw&lt;m

wwmom

m.wm*

Hammdams¢

w

o

383

0

0

pm

ow
mcuowm
mmmdmus

395

wwuwu

m
R§

oawmu

u

�zo
***

**

*

ac

n.e.

zo
593.

wanWOH.u

-

oummdw&lt;m

ammﬂm

wmwauou.
mammaw&lt;m

zo
mwmuwwwnmbﬁ

mHmuwanmbd

owocwm

mumswwwombd

Awmv

o.e.

Sea
gamumww

mw

2.:

m» ma

oosvaumOb
ewmuquawomv

Amqv

.ow .Om

ow
.OOH‘Hmamu

wm&lt;mw

wm&lt;mw

m.w

up.»

uwww.

Emma

:H.:

w:

:w.4

mm.“

Saws

w

wmdeUdm

mooam

Hm.w

a

w.wm*4

arm

Hm.w

po.m

mu
wmwmwuma

m.wm***po.w

cwww.

Emma

w&amp;.4

we;

Wm.m

mm.a

Emma

4.0
bmm

%

m.mm**.w.o

Hw.:

a

5.»

Hm.m

5.»

Ho.a

wow

Ho.p

mu

:.mo**wm.w
&gt;aucundwdo

ﬁuww

smmu

Hp.m

rw.m

Emma

wmmwm

wacnmdwou

H.4w
m.&lt;***

&amp;

m.wm

ow

E

p.»

w.“

Bbmbm

mu
mmH&lt;Hnmm

H&lt;

N»
u

Hm

prwv

m

33

mm

ww

p

mmwot

ow

u
Awmﬁv

Am$v

m

«mmdm

m.mw*
macomduon

r.mm*

mw

d

mm

Am4$v

3.33

Ammﬁv

mm

m

ow

mmRnwowomwoww

0%

Amway
Beam

ammﬁwmm

xm

4H

mp

u

N»

Q:

my
moan
zmdu&lt;m

u
Aqmav

8%

A4H$V

“mpgv

mum
wwmnm

m.wm*

m.mm*

Hm

v

mw

H

ow
mcuowm

owmmaw&lt;m

mmmdmwu

prﬁv

Q:

“MN$V

Amﬁv
wwudw

m

m

m

m

Amﬁv

:3:

Amﬁv

Ammv

akumnm

OdWmH

�-12..
DISCUSSION:

results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of birth

The

and F scale score were

significantly related to the type of therapy received

and

to the utilization of adjunctive services in this hospital.

Psychotherapy was

the treatment of choice for those patients

better educated,

native born and had lower

F

scores.

Such

were younger,

who

patients

were

also referred

more

frequently for the auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing
creative therapy. Conversely, those patients
were

older, poorly educated
likely to

were most

be

and foreign born,

referred for

EST.

who

and

had higher F scale scores,

particularly in Eastern Europe,

These

patients

were

infrequently

referred for psychological tests or for creative therapy. Furthermore, these
relationships

were

still

significant

when

diagnosis

was

held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of Hollingshead, Redlich
and

their

co—workers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15) who demonstrated

related to the type of therapy received in a

community.

The

present study

that such factors are also significant in a hospital setting

demonstrates

ability to

that social factors are

is not a criteria of therapeutic selection

pay

and where

all

where

forms

of therapy are equally available to the entire population.
With

financial aspects

and the

availability of therapeutic facilities

eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the selection
of treatment,

factors

may

of therapy.

two

alternative interpretations

may be

considered.

The

social

relate directly to the empirically established criteria for choice
On

this basis a patient is referred for electroshock because

older, poorly educated or foreign born, clinical experience having

shown

he

that

is

�- 13 such persons respond best to
adequate since

this type of treatment. This explanation is in-

half the patients with psychotic depression received psychotherapy

alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice

for this illness.
An

alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to

choice of treatment because they also affect certain psychological patterns of
behavior fundamental to conventional

cation.

Thus, a

modes

of therapy, such as

mode

of

communi-

patient is not referred for electroshock because he is foreign

born or poorly educated, but

rather, these factors provide the difference in

cultural background between patient

and

therapist

which makes successful communi»

cation less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship.

Robinson 33

Ei'

(15)

in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that psychotherapy is
most

likely to take place

where the

cultural background of the patient is similar

to that of the therapist. Conversely, patient-therapist differences in systems
of value and communication may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic

tionship. In the present study, similarly, the patients

who

rela—

received psycho-

therapy alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors studied.*
Apart from the problem of

patient-therapist differences, certain patterns

of communication exhibited by the patient may be

intrinsically incompatible with

the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations

haVe

therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9.
Sixteen percent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education

* The 18

was over 20.

�-11).shown

that verbally

and use of

uncommunicative persons, prone

to denial, evasion, stereotypy

cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8).

patterns appear to

be more frequent in persons with poorer

Such language

socio-cultural back-

grounds.

Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect

cation patterns,

that,

has noted

may
among

on communi-

also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler

(11)

patients diagnosed as schizophrenic, differences in

symptoms

are related to differences in cultural background. Frank 33 a}. (2), studying
psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose

symptoms were

expressed

in somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those
mained had
shock

ideational

patients (8)

we

symptoms.

symptoms

likely to

The

indicates that
The F

In a study of personality factors in electro~

hare noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and

communication were more

depressive psychosis.

re~

who

be associated with the development of a

relationship between communication pattern

symptoms themselves

are a

mode

and

of communication.

scale furnishes a quantifiable index of attitude and communication

patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a mental hospital
lation, Levinson (9) found that high—scorers

were

popuu

less receptive to entering a

psychotherapeutic relationship and were more likely to receive electroshock.
Tougas (17), using an

ethocentric scale similar to the

F

scale, found that

psychotherapy was more effective in patients with low scores.

study the

F

scale

was

In the present

the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment

groups.
These

results have clinical as well as theoretical significance.

�Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that low—scorers
the

scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that those with high

F

on
F

scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone. Another clinical application
may be

in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient.

This may be done by minimizing

closely for

age and place of

necessity for developing

their social differences, by matching

birth.

new modes

Of

them more

possible greater importance is the

of communication

when

treating patients

who

are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic approaches.*
While epidemiological

studies have clearly structured

some

of the

problems involved in selection of treatment, and have indicated the direction

of further study,

it still

remains for more process-oriented research to provide

definitive answers.

* See

Esecover's presentation of this topic in this issue.

�_

16 -

SUMMARY:

1.

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection

of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which

all

forms of therapy were

equally available, education, age, place of birth and score
F

on

the California

scale were significantly related to the type of therapy received and to the

utilization of adjunctive hospital services.
2.

who

were

older, poorly educated, had higher

F

scores

foreign born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most likely to

and were

be

Patients

referred for electroshock.

those patients

who

most

Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for

closely resembled the therapist in these aspects.
were present even when diagnosis was held

3.

These

relationships

h.

Among

the electroshock patients the

constant.

significant in choice of therapy
which a

patient
S.

was

were

factors found to

be

also related to the readiness with

referred for electroshock.

It is postulated that

treatment selection is the result of the

communicative interaction between patient and
be important

same

therapist. Social factors

may

insofar as they are related to different modes of communication.

�m

17 -

REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford, R.N.

(1950):
&amp;

The

Authoritarian Personality,

New

York: Harper

Brothers.

Frank, J.D., Gliedman, L.H., Imber, S.D., Nash, E.H. and Stone, A.R.
(1957):

Why

Neurol.

&amp;

Patients

Leave Psychotherapy, A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat., 11:

283—299.

Neurosis and Social Class,

Freedman, L.Z. and Rollin gsheadﬁﬁ. (1957):
Am.

J. Psychiat.,

Hillside Hospital, 29th

113: 769-775.

Annual Report, 1956.

Schizophrenia and Social

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Structure,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

110: 695-701.

Social Class and Psychiatric

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Disorders, in Interrelations Between the Social Environment
and

Psychiatric Disorders,

New

York:

Milbank Memorial Fund,

pp. 195-208.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

Therapy.
Zubin,

M.

(1957):

Changes

in

Language During Electroshock

In Psychopathology of Communication (Hoch, P. and

J. Eds.),

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

New

York: Grune

&amp;

Stratton.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol., in press.
Levinson, D.J.:
10.

Personal Communication.

Morgan, N.C. and Johnson, N.A. (1957):

Chronic Hospital Patient,

Am.

Failures in Psychiatry:
J. Psychiat.,

The

113: Sen-830.

�_

18

_

REFERENCES

11.

Schizophrenia and Culture, Scientific American,

Opler, M.K. (1957):

£91: 103» 110.
12.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, G.S., Gurvitz, M., Lurie,
(1956):

J. Hillside Hospital, 2:

1950,

and

Psychiatric Disorders,

Am.

Social Structure

J. Psychiat.,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

109: 729-73h.

Titus,

Psychiatric Treatment,

Am.

H.E. and Hollander, E.P. (1957):

Urban

113: 831—837.

Robinson, H.A., Redlich, F.C. and Myers, J.K. (l95h):
and

16.

l7—h0.

Rennie, T.A.C., Srole, L., Opler, M.K. and Langner, T.S. (1957):

Life and Mental Health,
15.

L.

Redlich, F.C., Hollingshead, A.B., Roberts, B.H., Robinson, H.A.,
Freedman, L.Z. and Meyers, K.J. (1953):

1h.

Rachlin,

Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from

Hillside Hospital in
13.

A. and

Social Structure

J. Orthopsychiat., g3: 307-316.
The

California

F Scale

in

Psychological Research: 1950-1955, Psychol. Bull., 53: h7-6h.
17.

Tougas, R.R. (195%):

Ethnocentrism as a Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy,

In Psychotherapy and Personality Change, 0.3. Rogers and R.F.
Dymond,

16,

Zierer,

E. and

eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. l96-21h.

Zierer,

E. (l956):

of Creative Activity,

Am.

Structure and Therapeutic Utilization

J. Psychotherapy, lg: h81-519.

�-

19 -

APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM

Below are a number of statements.

For each statement

we

give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree.

want you to

Answer each

statement according to one of the following:

I

AGREE A

I
I

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY

LITTLE

1.

No

MUCH

MUCH

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a

close friend or relation.
2.

Science has

its place,

but there are

many

important things that

must always be beyond human understanding.

3.

If

people would

talk less

and work more, everybody would be

better off.
h.

think about
5.

ation,

an

it,

a person has a problem or worry,

it

is best for

him not to

but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

What

and the

6.
much, a

When

the youth needs most is

will to

work and

strict discipline,

fight for family

Nowadays when so many

rugged determin-

and country.

different kinds of people

mix

together

so

person has to protect himself especially carefully against catching

infection or disease
7.

from them.

Sex crimes, such as rape and

mere imprisonment; such criminals ought

to

attack
be

on

children, deserve

more than

publicly whipped, or worse.

�”"1
‘

-20..
8.

is to

The

best teacher or boss is the

be done and how

9.

to

go about

10.

the strong.

tells

us exactly what

it.

Young people sometimes

up they ought to get over them and

one who

get rebellious ideas, but as they

settle

grow

down.

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak and

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2524">
                <text>Social factors in selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. J Hillside Hosp., 6: 216-228, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2525">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2526">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-25-030</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2527">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2528">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2529">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2530">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2531">
                <text>4 items. 1: [Preprint]. 2: Reprint from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry December 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565—574; title: Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital. 3: Xerox of J. Hillside Hospital publication. 4: Another [preprint]. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2532">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2533">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74455">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81016">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87577">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94138">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="274" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="65">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/b97c9ed1045d743c104ef57163e90f61.pdf</src>
        <authentication>cca8258a1cb2c00bbe3baaafbd7ccf91</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100691">
                    <text>Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization. Qis‘éttarge Ratings. and Diagnosis

ROBERT L. KAHN. P|1.D.; MAX POLLACK. Ph.D..
AND

J’

MAX FINKI M.D.
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

�Reprinted from the A. ill. .4. Archives of General Psychiatry
December 1959, Vol. 1. pp. 565—574
Copyright 1959, by American .llca’ical Association

Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings, and Diagnosis
ROBERT L. KAI-IN,

Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D.,

and

The increasing studies of the sociopsy—
chological aspects of psychiatric treatment
in recent years have primarily been concerned with treatment patterns in the community}? private practice,29 and outpatient
clinics.24’2" In the studies reported by
Hollingshead, Redlich, and their co—workers “'27 it was found that social class was
a major determinant of the type of psy—
chiatric treatment in the New Haven com—
munity. Patients from the upper classes
were more frequently treated with psycho—
therapy, while somatic or custodial care was
commoner among the lower classes. They
summarized their results by noting: “It was
found that treatment does not depend on
psychological and medical determinants
alone, but on the status position of the pa—
tient as well.” 27 Weinstock,29 reporting the
results of a poll of the American Psycho—
analytic Association, observed that the pa—
tients being treated by their members in
private practice came disproportionately
from the better—educated, high—income pop—
ulation.
Similar ﬁndings have been noted in
studies of outpatient facilities. Myers and
Schaffer 24 showed that the higher a per—
son’s social class the more likely he was to
be accepted for psychotherapy, treated by
more highly trained personnel, and treated
intensively over a long period of time. In
another study Rosenthal and Frank 28
Submitted for publication April 16, 1959.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by Grants M-927 and MY—2092,
National Institute of Mental Health, National 1n—
stitutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

MAX PINK, M.D., Glen Oaks, N.Y.

found almost a linear relationship, between
educational level and frequency of referral
for psychotherapy.
A more critical test of the importance
of sociopsychologic factors in relation to
psychiatric treatment would be in a setting
where the same therapeutic techniques and
services were equally available to all patients. This requirement is met at Hillside
Hospital, which is a nonproﬁt institution for
the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable symptoms,” 11 who are
admitted regardless of their ability to pay.
One of the main criteria for accepting pa—
tients is their “ability to participate proﬁt11
in
ably
Individual
psychotherapy.”
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is
regarded as the primary method of treatment, with physiodynamic therapies available when needed. The average length of
hospital stay is seven months, although
some patients stay for more than a year.
In a previous study of the Hillside Hos—
pital population,14 it was shown that the
factors of age, education, place of birth,
and degree of stereotypy, as measured by
the California F Scale,1 were related to the
selection of therapy. Those patients who
were older, had less education, were
foreign—born, and had high scores on the F
Scale were more likely to receive convulsive
therapy. In contrast, patients who were
younger, better—educated, and native—born
and obtained low scores on the F Scale re—
ceived psychotherapy as their sole form of
treatment.
The purpose of the present study was to
determine the relation of sociopsychological
27/565

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

factors to (1) the duration of hospitaliza—
tion, (2) the clinical evaluations at time of
discharge, and (3) the ﬁnal diagnosis.

Method
Population—The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside Hospital on March 7, 1957, was
studied. This consisted of 171 patients, 57 male and
114 female, ranging in age from 16 to 68 years,

'

i

with a mean of 35 years.
Procedure.——The patients were divided according
to the duration of hospitalization, clinical response
to treatment, and diagnosis. The duration was de—
termined by the number of complete months in the
hospital. The clinical response and the diagnosis
were determined by the medical director at a staff
evaluation conference, usually held just prior to the
patient’s discharge. Each patient was rated as
recovered, much improved, improved, or unim—
proved on the basis of the reports of the therapist,
supervising psychiatrist, and milieu staff. The
discharge diagnoses were divided into four major
groups: involutional psychosis, manic—depressive
psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychoneurosis. These
diagnostic categories included all but three patients
in the population.
Each patient was tested with a 10-item modi—
ﬁcation of the California F Scale.” The F
Scale is a questionnaire which has been related to
such factors as authoritarianism, acquiescence,
ethnocentrism, and rigidity.1 The subject reads 10
statements and indicates to what extent he agrees
or disagrees with each, i.e., “a little,” “pretty
much," or “very much.” The score for each item
1 to 7, and the total score
from
range is
ranges
10 to 70. High scores indicate greater agreement
with the statements. These are extreme, uncritical,
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one statement is this: “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”

1.

Results
Length of Hospitalization—In this

population the duration of hospitalization
ranged from 1 to 16 months, with a median
of 7 months. For the purpose of analysis,
the population was divided into three
groups: 49 patients Who were hospitalized
for 1 to 5 months; 64, for 6 to 9 months,
and 58 for 10 or more months.
The relation of sociopsychological factors
to the length of hospitalization is shown in
Table l. The group of patients who were
hospitalized for the shortest period had
28/566

of Hospitalization: Total
Population

TABLE 1.——Dnrati0n

Months in
Hospilal
to
to

1

6

No.

5
S)

or more

1.0

49
64
58

l
6

to 51‘s. ﬁlo?)
to 5 vs. 10 or
more
to 9 vs. 10 or
more

Education.
Mean
ForeignYr.
Born

F Score.
Mean

Mean
Yr.

43.9
31.0

45.5
32.5
27.9

10.0
11.9
12.8

Mean

M can

Diﬂ'e-

Mean
Differ-

ences

ences

13.0

§

1.9

T

§

40.1

Diﬁ: reneos
1

Age,

3.4
12.9

§

17.6

§

2.8

9.5

§

4.6

*

0.9

41%
19%
10%
x ’=15.0 I

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.

*

1‘

the highest mean F scores, were oldest, and
had the least education and the largest per—
centage of foreign—born. Conversely, the
group in the hospital for 10 months or more
had the lowest F scores, were youngest, and
had the most education and the smallest
percentage of foreign births. Patients who
were hospitalized for an intermediate period
fell in be;ween these two groups for each
of the factors.
When the data for those patients who re—
ceived convulsive therapy (Table 2) and
those who received psychotherapy (Table
3) as their only form of treatment were
analyzed separately, similar relationships
between sociopsychological factors and
length of hospitalization were found within
each group.
In the psychotherapy group there was an
increase in mean years of education with
greater months of hospitalization, but the
differences fail of signiﬁcance. It may be
noted, however, that many of the patients
who were in the hospital for 10 months or
more were under 19 years of age and were
thus unable to achieve more than a limited
number of years of schooling.
These same relationships of sociopsychological factors to length of hospitalization
were found when the patients were classi—
Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

2,—Dnration of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving C onvnlswe Therapy
F Score,
N0. Mean

Months in
Hospital
to 5
6 to 9
10 or more

15

1

17
25

58.2
45.6
34.9

ences

to 5 vs.
1 to 5 v8.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
*
T

1
§

to 9
10 or

12.61

6

Differences
9.5

Education,
Mean
ForeignYr.

*

‘

Months 1”
Hospital

Born

67%
24%
16%
x2= 12.0

6.5
12.3
13.2

Mean

or

1 '50

§

19.6

§

*

10.1

1

t

to 5 vs.
to 5 vs.
more
to 9173.
more

1

§

0.9

Education,
Mean
Yr.

ForeignBorn

11-4
11-7
12.4

29-1
24-8

30%
16%
8%
x2=5.4

istic of patients hospitalized for the longest
periods. As a group, patients diagnosed
as schizophrenic were the most homoge—
neous in relation to time in the hospital,
showing major differences only in the F
score, without a consistent trend for the
factors of education or place of birth.
2. Results of Treatment—The relation
of sociopsychological factors to evaluation
on discharge is shown in Table 5. There

to 9
10 or
6

1.6
12.4

10

ences

*

Mean

Differences

141*

0.3

*

1,0

18.4

or
10.8

4.3

0.7

a deﬁnite, almost linear, relationship be—
tween the ratings of improvement and these
factors. Patients in the recovered group
had the highest F scores, were oldest, least
educated, and showed the highest incidence
of foreign birth. In contrast, patients in
the unimproved group had the lowest F
scores, were younger, better educated, and
were mostly native—born. Because of the
Wide variability within each group, however,
only the factor of age reached a level of
statistical signiﬁcance. Education also sig—
niﬁcantly differentiated the groups when
dichotomized according to- those who had
less than eight years of education and those
who had eight years or more. Of the re—
covered patients, 29% had less than eight
IS

ﬁed according to four major diagnostic
groups (Table 4). For each diagnostic
class, the lowest F scores, youngest mean
ages, most years of education, and least
percentages of foreign—born were character—

Mean
Diﬁer-

P=0.001.

.

-

.

.

.

4.—Duration 0f Hospitalization in Patients Classiﬁed According to Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Involutional psychosis ___________________

Manic-depressive psychosis

..............

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
Mean

1-5
6-9

58.2
150.9

10+
1—5

6-9

10+

...........................

1-5
6-9

10+

............................

1-5

10+

Kahn et al.

432

Differences

*

Psychoneurosis

40-2
38-6
27-8

Mean

OHCES

6.7

Mean
Yr.

26

Mean
Diﬂer5.8

F Score,
Mean

33
43

5

Age,

1

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
P&lt;0.01.
P&lt;0.001.

TABLE

N 0-

to 9
or more

6
10

6

10.7

Schizophrenia

of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Psychotherapy Only

1

23.3
10

Mean
Yr.
51.7
42.2
32.1

Mean
Diﬁer1

Age,

TABLE 3.———Dnration

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

35.0

58.8
54.5
52.3

16.0

40.0
46.1
33.1

46.8
39.1
35.5

11.0
11.7
12.3

39%
23%

40.1
36.6
36.1

41.0
27.1

8.7
12.5

27.1

12.5

50%
19%
13%

36.3
38.5
27.6

27.8
27.8
24.1

13.3
12.3
12.9

7.1

9.6

57%
43%
0

0

10%

8%
12%

39/567

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
TABLE

5.—Discharge Evaluation

No.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................
................................
.............................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved
Unimproved

17

'

82
63
9

F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

42.9
39.0
36.1
31.1

44.5
35.6
31.2
31.1

10.7
11.2
11.2
13.2

Mean

Mean
Differences

M ean

Differences

Recovered vs. Much Improved _____________________________
Recovered vs. Improved
Recovered vs. Unimproved
Much Improved vs. Improved
Much Improved vs. Unimproved
Improved vs. Uni mproved

3.9
6.8
11.8
2.9
7.9
5.0

....................................
.................................
.............................
...........................
.................................

Age,

8.9
13.3

*

13.4

*

4.4
4.5
0.1

T

Foreign-Born
41%
22%
16%
11%
x2=6.1

Differences

I

0.5
0.5
2.5
0.0
2.0
2.0

‘ P&lt;0.05.

t P&lt;0.02.
3

P&lt;0.01.

years’ education, while all of the unimproved
patients had more than eight years’ educa—
tion; the much improved and improved pa—
tients were in between. By x2—analysis
these results were signiﬁcant at the 5%
level of conﬁdence.
When the data were analyzed for the
patients treated with convulsive therapy, the
trends noted for the population as a whole
were intensiﬁed (Table 6). Analysis of the
patients who received psychotherapy as
their only form of treatment (Table 7),
however, failed to show any statistically
signiﬁcant pattern. The recovered patients
were oldest and had the highest percentage
of foreign births, but education and F score
did not show any clear trend.
TABLE

relation of sociopsychological factors to diagnosis is shown in
Table 8. Those patients classiﬁed as show—
ing involutional reactions had the highest
F scores, the oldest mean age, the least
years of education, and the highest inci—
dence of foreign birth. In contrast, pa—
tients classiﬁed as schizophrenic had the
lowest F scores, the youngest mean age, the
most years of education, and the least num—
ber of foreign—born. Patients classed in
manic—depressive psychosis and psycho—
neurosis categories were in between with
regard to these social factors.
3. Diagnosis.‘—The

Comment
The present study has demonstrated that

sociopsychological factors, in addition to

6.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving C onvnlsive Therapy

Evaluation

No.

F Score,
Mean

Recovered _______________________________
Much improved __________________________
Improved and unimproved _______________

8
26
23

53.1
41.8
39.7

Foreign-Born

51.6
43.8
32.3

9.4
10.6
12.3

50%
35%
17%

x '=3.5

Mean
Differences

Recovered vs. much improved ______________________________
Recovered ”8. improved and unimproved ____________________
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved _____________

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Age,

11.3
13.4 "
2.1

Mean

Mean
Differences

7.8
19.3 I
11.5 T

1.2
2.9
1.7

Differences

*

‘ P&lt;0.05.

P&lt;0.02.
1 P&lt;0.001.
1

30/568

Vat. 1, Dee, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

7.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving Psychotherapy Only
N0.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved and unimproved ...............

9

54
39

F Score,
Mean
32-6
38.1
33.5

Mean
Diﬂerences

..............................
...................
.............

Recovered vs. much improved
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved

5.5
0.9
4.6

their previously determined importance in
the selection of treatment, are also signiﬁ—
cantly related to the duration of treatment,
the evaluation of the results of treatment,
and the psychiatric diagnosis. If such re—
sults were obtained in a survey of private
practitioners, as in the Weinstock report?9
it could be concluded that the limitation of
the number of practitioners and the expense
of treatment served to select preferred persons from the upper social classes who
could afford the treatment in terms of time
and money. The present results, however,
were obtained in an institution where the
various kinds of treatment were equally
available to all patients and where the ability
to pay was not a factor in the management
of the patient. We postulate, therefore, that
TABLE

Diagnosis

N 0.

Involutional psychosis ___________________
Manic-Depressive psychosis ______________
Psychoneurosis ___________________________
Schizophrenia ____________________________

24

39
37
68

..................

ForeigmBorn

38.2
32.2
31.9

12.3
12.0
12.2

33%
15%
18%

Mean
Differences
6.0
6.3
0.3

x '= 1.8

Mean
Diﬁerences
0.3
0.1
0.2

the observed relationships are not due
merely to mechanically selective aspects,
such as income or the prestige status of the
patient. Social factors are important be—
cause they are also related to psychological
processes, such as the habitual patterns of
communication, modes of expression, and
symbolic values. We shall attempt to
evaluate these processes and their effect on
the psychiatric relationships studied in
terms of the inﬂuence of sociopsychological
factors on the attitude and behavior of the
therapist, the patient, and the therapist—pa—
tient interaction.
Current data both from this laboratory 14
and from others 19'24'27'28 have demon—
strated that psychotherapy is most likely
to be sustained with those persons who most

8.—Diagnosis
F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

52.3
40.8
36.9
32.8

56.7
41.9
29.4
26.1

Mean

Mean

Differences

Involutional vs. Manic-depressive psychosis ________________
Involutional psychosis vs. psychoneurosis
Involutional vs. schizophrenia ______________________________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. psychoneurosis _____________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. schizophrenia _______________
Psychoneurosis us. schizophrenia___________________________

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Age,

11.5
15.4
19.5

3.9
8.0
4.1

I

i
§

’r

Age,

Education,
Mean Yr.
8.9
11.5
11.9
12.7

Differences

14.8
27.3
30.6
12.5
15.8
3.1

2.0 ‘
3.0 I
4.5 §
0.4
1.6
0.8

§
§
§
§

46%
26%
22%
10%
x==14,2 r

Mean

Differences
§

Foreign-Born

P&lt;0.05.
T P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

K ahn et al

31/569

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

closely resemble the therapists with regard
to cultural background, systems of value,
and communication patterns. With stress at
Hillside Hospital on psychoanalytically
oriented psychotherapy, it is consistent that
those patients who are most like the
therapists with regard to these factors would
be kept in the, hospital for the longest
period. This was true for patients receiving
convulsive therapy or psychotherapy and
for all diagnostic groups.
The length of time a patient remains in
a psychiatric facility is related to the particular function and philosophy of the insti—
tution. In studies of outpatient clinics
'
Which have a psychoanalytic orientation 2438
it has been observed that persons from the
higher social classes, determined by education' or income, are treated for a longer
period. In contrast, in state mental hos—
pitals, patients with/the least education are
kept longer and form a higher proportion
of the chronically hospitalized group‘.6'17"23
The state—hospital therapist, Viewing the in—
Stitution primarily as a custodial facility,12
is evidently oriented toward the more rapid
discharge of those patients “who come from
a background most like his own.
The observation of the relation between
sociopsycholo-gical factdrs and improvement
rating, particularly in those patients receiv—
ing convulsive therapy, may also be related
to differences in communication patterns
between therapist and patient that result in
referral for convulsive therapy. The
therapist may set different criteria for im—
provement for the;older, lesseducated pa—
tients than he does for the younger, more
sophisticated ones. In the patient with littlr
education and with modes of expression
different fromhis own, he may regard, for
example, the manifestation of denial or
minimization of symptoms as improvement.15 But in patients culturally like him—
self, the expression of denial is regarded
as a defensive operation, and the patient is
considered unimproved.
Ratings of improvement are also related
to the base line of premorbid functioning.
_

32/570

Thus, the rating of recovered is deﬁned at
Hillside Hospital as “the reasonable expectation that the patient will be able to
return to his community and function as
well, or better, than he did before he became
ill.” 11 The therapist’s perception of the
patient’s premorbid functioning may be influenced by the distance between his value
system and that of the patient’s. The greater
the social distance between therapist and
patient the less rigorous the requirements
for behavioral change may be. For example, for older, lower—class patients the
ability to resume work may be the major
criterion of improvement. For bettereducated patients work adjustment may be
one of many criteria, including such intangible aspects of behavior as insight, work
gratiﬁcation, and ease of sociability. The
patient’s expectancy not only of the type
of psychiatric treatment but of improvement is also dependent upon social back—

ground.12

While the same trends were shown in the
psychotherapy patients, the results did not
reach the level of statistical signiﬁcance.
This may have been due to the greater
homogeneity of these patients for the
factors studied, in contrast to the convulsive group. The outpatient study by
Rosenthal and Frank 28 also failed to ﬁnd a
relation between social factors and improvement rating in the patients who received
psychotherapy. This observation, also,
was obtained in a population that was more
homogeneous after the initial admission
selection process and after the spontaneous
screening effected by the patient’s willingness to attend treatment after he had been
accepted.

The marked relationship between socio~
psychological factors and diagnosis is not
surprising. Certainly, the relationship of
age and diagnosis is an established concept
in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional
disorders and in dementia precox the names
themselves have a chronological connotation. Landis and Page,19 in 1938, stated that
age was the “most important single deterVol. 1, Dec., 19.59

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

mining factor that we can know about men—
tal disease.” They asserted that, given the
age distribution of a group of patients, they
could accurately predict the number in each
diagnostic group, as well as the probable
outcome with respect to recovery and the
length of hospital residence. More recently,
Frumkin,8 reporting the median ages of ﬁrst
admissions to a mental hospital in Ohio,
observed data similar to our own with re—
gard to the ages for the various diagnostic
groups.
In the present study, however, we have
also shown that education, place of birth,
and F score signiﬁcantly differentiate the
major diagnostic groups in the hospital. In
view of these ﬁndings, we have postulated
that a psychiatric diagnosis is not just a
one—to—one reﬂection of a speciﬁc type of
behavior pattern but is also a value judg—
ment in terms of social interaction. Thus,
both in our own studies and in the work of
others 12 it has been noted that patients
with similar symptoms will receive different
diagnoses, depending on their social background.
An additional hypothesis relating sociopsychologic factors to diagnosis may be
based on the concept that persons from dif—
ferent social backgrounds acquire different
habitual modes of adaptation, communica—
tion, and expression. Accordingly, under
conditions of stress, altered brain function,
or states associated with the onset of mental
illness, a person will show those behavior
patterns or symptoms which are similar to
his habitual patterns. Thus, persons from a
lower—class social background are more apt
to communicate in nonverbal, physical
terms, while upper—class people are more
likely to do so in ideational and verbal
modes. Thus, anger may be expressed by
lower—class people by physical violence,
while persons from the upper classes are
more likely to resort to exhortation or argument.
Opler and Singer,25 studying schizo—
phrenic Irish and Italian patients in a
Veteran’s facility, found signiﬁcant difKahn et al.

ferences in the types of symptoms related
to cultural differences in the family backgrounds. Patients from Irish families in
which the active expression of emotions
were frowned upon and who had dominant,
overprotective mothers, were passive, com—
pliant, and withdrawn, and were fearful of
anything which might separate them from
the protection of the hospital. Patients with
Italian family backgrounds that encouraged
free expression of emotion and who were
ruled by a dominant father, showed as—
saultive and destructive behavior, were difﬁ—
cult to manage, and were rebellious against
authority.
In a comparable study, Miller and Swan—
'22
noted that hospitalized schizophrenic
son
patients exhibited signiﬁcant social-class
difference in symptomatology. Lower—class
patients showed a predominance of “mo—
toric themes,” while middle—class patients
exhibited “conceptual or r u m i n a t i v e
themes.”
Hollingshead and Redlich 12 found a
marked difference in the type of neuroses
shown by persons from different social
classes. While hysterical reactions were
found predominantly at the lowest social
levels, obsessive—compulsive patterns were
characteristic of the upper classes. They
felt that the lower—class patient expresses
his neurosis by acting out, whereas the
upper—class neurotic shows his symptoms
in ideational dissatisfaction with himself.
According to our hypothesis, then, we
should expect that persons from lower
social levels would show symptoms that are
nonverbal, and are expressed predominantly
in sensory or motor patterns. Among such
types of symptoms would be psychomotor
retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor,
muteness, hysterical blindness, and paral—
ysis. In this connection it is noteworthy
that both hysteria and manic—depressive
psychosis have been reported on the wane
in the general population."-”4'8'10 This de—
crease, in our View, is related to the general
increase in educational level of the country
as a whole. One cannot, of course, ascribe
33/571

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom
in sexual matters; hysteria is commonest in
more poorly educated people, who are least
2‘6
has reported
inhibited sexually.”6 Rees
that those British soldiers who had hysteri—
cal symptoms in World War II were mainly
the mental defectives. He noted that
hysterical symptoms were related to intelli—
7
indi—
has
education.
and
Freyhan
gence
cated not only that the present clinical
patterns of hysteria are different from those
shown at the turn of the century but that
such schizophrenic manifestations as “cata—
leptic stupors, stereotypical motor peculiar—
ities, grandiose excitement, and violent
behavior” are difﬁcult to ﬁnd today. These
observations suggest that a sociopsycho—
logical framework can lead to the prediction
of future patterns of mental illness.
In our investigations of persons with depressive psychoses, we have frequently
noted a pattern of premorbid behavior char—
acterized by lack of imagination, creativity,
and introspective capacity, and by conven—
tionality and general rigidity.13 Similar
patterns have been reported by other
.authors.3’5"”'21 We believe that a deprived
cultural background, such as that involving
little or no education, with the early years
spent in an illiterate environment with
meager cultural resources, is conducive to
the development of such a personality pat—
tern. When mentally disordered, such per—
sons react with the repertoire of behavior
patterns that we term “depression.”
It is important to keep in mind that While
the relationship between social factors and
the psychiatric aspects described is probably
applicable as a general principle, the speciﬁc
ﬁndings may vary in different settings or
institutions. For example, Hollingshead and
Redlich12 found that schizophrenia was a
diagnosis proportionately commoner among
the lower than among the upper classes,
while at Hillside Hospital the schizophrenic
patients had the highest education. This
discrepancy may be related to differences
in composition of the two populations, the
Hillside patients being drawn largely from
34/572

the middle—class groups, with relatively few
from the upper or lower social classes. In
Hillside Hospital the diagnosis of schizo—
phrenia may indicate an “interesting” pa—
tient, while in a state hospital population the
same diagnosis may represent a patient who
is “hopeless.”
From the perspectives developed in this
report, observations which are commonly
explained in motivational and “dynamic”
terms may also be understood in other
ways. Thus, some situations where a pa~'
tient is said to be “hostile” or “resisting
psychotherapy” may reﬂect a problem in
communication between patient and ther—
apist, related to their differences in social
background.
It also is apparent that the social back—
ground of the majority of the mentally ill
paients is such as to make the current prac—
tice of universally employing a verbal, in—
sightful—oriented therapeutic approach a
difﬁcult, if not inappropriate, procedure.
The answer to the problem of how to treat
the vast number of mentally ill may be
not to train more and more psychother—
apists, but, rather, to develop therapeutic
techniques more suitable to the patient’s
own systems of value and communication.

Summary and Conclusions
Signiﬁcant relationships were found be—
tween sociopsychological factors and dura—
tion of hospitalization, discharge evaluation,
and diagnosis in a voluntary mental hos—
pital.
Patients hospitalized for the shortest
period were oldest, had the least education,
were most likely to have been foreign—born,
and had the highest scores on the California
F Scale. Younger, native—born, more educated, and lower F—score patients were hos—
pitalized the longest.
The same relationship of these factors
to length of hospitalization was found
when analyses were made according to type
of treatment (convulsive therapy or psycho—
therapy) and diagnosis.
Discharge evaluations of improvement
were signiﬁcantly related to age, the older
Vol. 1,

Dec, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

.

patients having the more favorable ratings.
Analysis of the data by type of treatment
demonstrated that patients rated as recovered or much improved after convulsive
therapy had the highest F scores, the least
education, and were most likely to be
foreign-born.
Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psycho—
neurosis were associated with lower F
scores, younger ages, more education, and
native birth. The older, less educated,
foreign—born, high-F-score patients were
most frequently classiﬁed under involu—
tional or manic-depressive psychosis.
It is postulated that these relationships
reﬂect the inﬂuence of social background on
psychological processes, such as the habitual
patterns of communication, modes of eXpression, and symbolic values. These not
only contribute to the pattern of mental ill—
ness but affect all aspects of the patient—
therapist interaction.
Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263d St. (Dr. Fink).

REFERENCES
Adorno, T. W.; Frenkel—Brunswik, E.;
Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.: The
Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper &amp;
Brothers, 1950.
2. Arieti, S.: The Decline of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis: Its Signiﬁcance in the Light of Dynamic and Social Psychiatry, paper read at 113th
Annual Meeting of American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, 1957.
3. Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality,
AMA. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 762617—618,
1.

1956.
4. Chodoff,

P.: A Re-examination of Some

Aspects of Conversion Hysteria, Psychiatry 17:
75-81, 1954.

E;

Baker, R; Cohen, R. A.;
Fromm-Reichmann, F., and Weigert, E.: An In—
tensive Study of 12 Cases of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiatry 17:103-137, 1954.
6. Dunham, H. W., and Meltzer, B. N.:
Predicting Length of Hospitalization of Mental
Patients, Am. J. Sociol. 52:123—131, 1946.
7. Freyhan, F. A.: The Impact of Somatic
Therapies on Course and Clinical Proﬁle of the
Schizophrenias, J. Clin. &amp; Exper. Psychopath. 19:
5.

Cohen, M.

195-201, 1958.

Frumkin, R. M.: Occupation and Major
Mental Disorders, in Mental Health and Mental
8.

Kalm et al.

Disorder, prepared by a committee of the Society
for Study of Social Problems, edited by A. M.
Rose, New York, W. W. Norton &amp; Company,

Inc., 1955, pp. 136-160.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The
Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Depression, Proceeding 42d Annual Meeting of
American Psychopathological Association, edited
by P. H. Hoch and J. Zubin, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952, pp. 199-209.
10. Harvey, W. A.: Changing Syndrome and
Culture: Recent Studies in Comparative Psychiatry,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat. 2:165—171, 1956.
11. Hillside Hospital: Twenty—Ninth Annual Report, 1956.
12. Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C.:
Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community
Study, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
13. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.:
Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. N europsychiatry, to be published.
14. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and
Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a.
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
9.

216-228, 1957.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
Psychopathology of Communication, Proceedings
of 46th Annual Meeting of American Psychopathological Association, edited by P. H. Hoch and
J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1958.
16. Kinsey, A. C.; Pomeroy, W. B., and
Martin,
C. 13.: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1948.
17. Kramer, M.; Goldstein, H.; Israel, R. H.,
and JohnsonpN. A.: A Historical Study of the
Disposition of First Admissions to a State Mental
Hospital, Public Health Monograph No. 32,
Government Printing Ofﬁce, 1955.
18. Kramer, K.; Pollack, E. S., and Redick,
R. W.: Studies of Incidence and Prevalence of
Hospitalized Mental Disorders in the United
States: Current Status and Future Goals, paper
read at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American
Psychopathological Association, New York, 1959.
19. Landis, C., and Page, I. D.: Modern
Society and Mental Disease, New York, Farrar &amp;
Rinehart, Inc., 1938.
20. Gallagher, E. B.; Levinson, D. J., and
Erlich, I.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics
of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric
Treatment, in The Patient and the Mental Hos—
pital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D. I. Levinson, and
R. H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
21. Malamud, W.; Sands, S. L., and Malamud,
I.: The Involutional Psychoses: A Socio—Psy—
chiatric Study, Psychosom. Med. 3:410-426, 1941.
22. Miller, D. R., and Swanson, (3.: Defense
Against Conﬂict and Social Background, paper
15.

35/573

V

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

read as part of a symposium at the meeting of the
American Psychological Association, September,
1953.
23. Morgan, N. C., and Johnson, N.

Disorder, New York, Milbank Memorial Fund,

1950, pp. 51-52.
27. Robinson,

H.

A.; Redlich, F. C., and
Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric
Treatment, Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 24:307-316,

A.: Failures
in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient, Am.
J. Psychiat. 113 :824-830, 1957.
24. Myers, J. K., and Schaffer, L.: Social
Stratiﬁcation and Psychiatric Practice: A Study
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev. 19:

Frank, J. D.: The Fate
of Psychiatric Clinic Outpatients Assigned to
Psychotherapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 127:330—

L.: Ethnic

I.: Report of the Central

307-310, 1954.
25. Opler, M. K., and Singer, J.

Differences
Internat. J.
26. Rees,
Gruenberg,

36/574

in Behavior and Psychopathology,
Soc. Psychiat 2:11—22, 1956.
J. R.: in discussion on paper by
E. M., in Epidemiology of Mental

Printed and Published

1954.
28. Rosenthal, D., and

343, 1958.
29. Weinstock, H.

Committee of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, paper read at the 48th
Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathologi—
cal Association, New York, 1958.
Fact—Gathering

in the United States of

Amerm

�a.

"—1

“‘1

Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

__..1

Fl

l

I
J2

P
]

�Sociopsychological Aspects of

Psychiatric Treatment in

Three Voluntary Hospitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Fink, M.D.**,

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.***

�This study was done when the authors were associated at the
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

L.I.

Oaks,

New

York, 1959—1962.

The cooperation of Dr. Max Pollack and the staffs of the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial

Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.

'

"

Aided, in part, by grants My-2092 and MY—2715, of the National
Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service; and the

Nassau County Mental Health Board.

*

Present Address:

Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore
.Hospital and Medical Center, 111
East 210th Street,

York

MIP

10467.

New

York,

New

**

Present Address:

Department of Psychiatry at the
Missouri Institute of Psychiatry,
School of Medicine, University of
Missouri, 5400 Arsenal Street,
St. Louis, Missouri 63139

***

Present Address:

National Institute of Mental Health,

2/1/65

Bethesda, Maryland

�their studies of the

psychiatric patient popsignificant relationships between an individual's position in the social class structure
.and the incidence of treated illness, types of diagnosed disorders
and kindsand duration of psychiatric treatment administered (2)9 The
influence of the economic status of the patient on the availability
of treating personnel, however, was not excludedo
ulation,

In

New

Haven

Hollingshead and Redlich have reported

Studies of the role of social factors in the treatment of
hospitalized patients independent of their financial status and the
availability of treatments were undertaken at Hillside Hospital in
1957. In this hospital, a variety of treatment modes, including in—

dividual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy and convulsive therapies were
available to all patients regardless of their ability to paya In
these surveys (3,4) we observed that patients hospitalized for the
shortest periods were older, had less education and were more often
of foreign birtho These older, less educated patients were predom—
inantly treated by convulsive therapy and received more favorable
clinical discharge ratings. In contrast, younger, native born and
more educated patients were hospitalized for longer periods, treated
primarily by psychotherapy and received poorer discharge ratingso
These clinical factors were also related to a measure of stereotypy,
the California F Scale (1,5)o Higher F scores, i429, greater stereotypy, were often fOund in patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis,
who were referred for convulsive therapy, hospitalized for shorter
periods, and more often were rated as much improved or recoveredg

it was suggested that differencesin psychiatric treatment among hospitals should reflect the
influence of social factors as noted for the patients within Hillside
Hospitala To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the procedures of the 1957 Hillside study in three institutions
Hillside
In the survey reported here,

—w

F. Menninger Memorial Hospital in Topeka and the
Hospital, the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston, These institutions were
selected with the expectation that they had diverse treatment modalities
C.

equally available, yet served patients of different social classeso

Each provided short—term treatment of voluntary patients and did not
provide custodial careo Each is a residency training center with a full
time supervisory staff and active research units, emphasizing psycho-

analytically—oriented psychotherapyo

This study was designed to determine the population characterof the three institutions with respect to social class, age,
education and F score; and to relate these characteristics to treatment
variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluation among the institutions,

istics

�METHOD

A

census of

institutions

all voluntary, adult patients in residence in

in January, 1959. While Menninger and
patients only, a small number of those
at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned by the
courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a specific research project.
These patients were excluded from the study because of their non—voluntary
status. The California F scale was scored for each patient on the census
the

was undertaken

Hillside Hospitals

had voluntary

day.

Eighteen months later the records of discharged patients
were examined to determine the social and psychiatric factors of the
study. For a measure of social class, the Hollingshead 2-factor index a weighted score of education and occupation - was used (3,4,7). The
study population consisted of 173 patients at Hillside, 100 at Menninger
and 95 at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
The study included examination of the relations of the social
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult however, because of

various methodological differences discussed below. These difficulties
were most marked in the intra—hospital comparisons, and accordingly, in
the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will be placed on the

differences between institutions with citation of intra—institutional
trends. These difficulties also led to missing information for some
data, which is reflected in the tables by the varying population sample
Sizes.

�RESULTS

A. Methodological Problems
When

of the hospital

reporting studies

tioned briefly.

from one institution, the structure
be taken for granted and either ignored or men—
In gathering comparable data from multiple institu—

may

tions, however, the

many

differences between institutions are accen-

tuated. While these institutions were selected as comparable in
teaching, research and treatment programs, they were functionally
unlike in ways which influenced the data of the study. Specific dif—
ferences were prominent in the designation of type of treatment,
diagnostic classifications, and the evaluation of treatment outcome.
1. Designation of Type of Treatment:

designating that
the

institutions,

a

The

criteria for

patient received "psychotherapy" differed

making comparisons

difficult.

among

Hospital psychotherapy was designated as
treatment administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychia—
trist for which the patient was charged a feeo Sessions with the
psychiatric resident were considered part of routine administrative
patient care.
At Menninger

At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with a psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not
treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising res—
ident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy
designated as the activity of many disciplines -- psychiatric
residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident responsible for each case.

was

Individual institutional diagnostic styles
At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed
the multiple evaluative scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric
Association, while both Hillside and MMHC followed different unitary
systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed in
Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable to
that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
2. Diagnosis:

made comparisons

source of

difficult.

distortion.

�Table I

30 Discharge Ratings of Improvement:
Ratings of imw
provement at the three hOSpitals varied in format and detail. The
discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes.
Hillside Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global

ratings.making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor
of the Menninger system (Table II), For this study the Menninger
syndrome rating was compared to the global ratings of the other

institutions,

Table

B.

II

Inter—hospital Comparison
lo Sociopsycholqgical Variables
The

distribution of the variables of social class, age,
among the three institutions

education and California F Scale score
is presented in Table III.

Table

III

.

a) Social Class: The anticipated difference in social
class composition of the three institutions was observedo At
Menninger Hospital the population was predominantly upper class;
At Hillside Hospital, middle class; and at Massachusetts Mental
Health Center, predominantly lower class.
b) Age:

There were no differences in age distribution

in the institutional populationso

�populations also differed in edu_”
more years of education
at Menninger Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
While 41 per cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high
school, only 32 per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger
did not graduateo
c) Education:

The

cational attainment, with patients having

d) F Score:
Differences in the distribution of scores
on the California F Scale were also observed. Fifty—one per cent
of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight perm
cent with scores of 50 or above -— the higher F scores being assoc—

iated with higher degrees of stereotypy, In contrast, at Hillside
thirty—one per cent of the patients had F scores below 30 while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were below

309

Thus, differences in social class, educational attainment and performance on the F Scale were observed. These differences permit a test of the hypotheses relating sociopsychologi-

cal factors to the treatment variables

among

these institutions.

2. Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment:

Among

the

institutions,

significantly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (43%) received
somatic therapy than at Hillside (64%) or MMHC (68%) (Table IV)c
b) Duration of Hospitalization: The three insti~
tutions differed with regard to patient's length of stay (Table IV)o
Patients at Menninger Hospital were hospitalized longest, with
65% of patients remaining for twelve months or more, compared to
31 per-cent of the Hillside patients and only 5 per—cent at the
Massachusetts Mental Health Center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two—thirds of the
patients were discharged within six months of hospitalizatione

MMHC
1,——

c) Discharge Evaluation:

In each hospital, most
were evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved"
(Table IV), At Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage
(19%) of patients were rated as "unimproved” and only a single
patient was scored "recovered" or "much improved"a The highest
percentage of "recovered" or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the
lowest proportion of "unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachu—

patients

setts Mental Health Centera
d)

nostic groupings

Diagnosis: For statistical analysis three diagwere made: schizophrenia, affective disorders, and

�psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV)» The diag~
nostic proportions of patients within these groups were similar
for Hillside and MMHC, as slightly more than half were diagnosed
as schizophrenia and one~quarter as psychoneurosis or affective
disordero In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and
personality disorder accounted for more than fifty perucent of the

populationo

Table

Co

IV

Intra—Hospital Comparisons

lack of meaningful criteria for the subdivision of
populations, their homogeneity within each institution, and the
limited sample size (several groupings were obtained which had
fewer than five cases) precluded significant intra—hospital comparisonso However, the trends appeared similar to those found in
the earlier studyg Age and F score were found related to the
selection of treatment at Menninger Hospital (older and higher F
score patients more frequently receiving somatic therapy), and
F score alone at Hillsideo
Length of hospitalization and chron—
ological age were related at both the Menninger and Hillside
Hospitals the younger patients remaining for the longest periodso
While such relationships were significant in these two hospitals,
a similar trend was noted at the MMHC (Table V) where no patients
over 40, but 14% of patients under the age of 20 remained longer
than a year,
The

—

Table

V

�-7DISCUSSION

The patients of three voluntary psychiatric hospitals
exhibited significant inter-institutional differences in social
class and years of education, but not age; in distribution of
California F Scale scores; and in each of the treatment var~
duration of hospitalization, selection of treatments
iables
and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations (7),
Expectations based on our earlier intra—Hillside Hospital were
confirmed, The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutions“
Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the shorter periods of hospitalization, lower preportions of
psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,
——

It is

our impression that these differences in psymore to differences in staff attitudes and social class variables than psychiatric differences in
populations, The contrasts between institutions in duration of
hospitalization are great, as are the complexity of diagnostic
formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of psychotherapy,
and the details and amount of recorded data. While these styl~
istic differences may be dismissed as idiosyncratic, they follow
a pattern related to social differences, and their consistency
with expectations suggests a greater dependence on social class
variables than ordinarily acknowledged.

chiatric treatment are related

Such population and treatment variable relationships
interactive
are
processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff and by the constellation
of symptoms or history which patients presente Such relationships
are marked most in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, i£§,, where objective criteria defining diseases of known etiology are absent, as in schizophrenia,
psychoneurosis, personality and behavior disordersw Under these
conditions of perceptual and situational ambiguity, the observer's
attitudes and expectations become significant aspects of his perceptions, classifications, and decisions. A similar situation was
clearly documented by Pasamanick, Dinitz and Lefton (6) in their
study of variations in diagnosis within a single institution,
They observed that patients assigned at random to different wards
did not differ in type of admission, marital status, education,
age or residenceo Significant differences did occur, however, in

�the incidence of various diagnostic classifications among the
three wards and among three administrators on one ward. As no
differences in the populations were demonstrated, we believe the
different incidence of diagnoses reflect the attitudes of the

examinerso

Present psychiatric concepts of diagnosis and clinical
evaluation have little meaning when transferred from one insti—
tution to anothero Literal adherance to these concepts produces
paradoxical resultso For example, Menninger Hospital with the
more highly trained personnel conducting treatment, keeps its
patients for the longest time, has the fewest patients diagnosed
as schizophrenia, and yet, reports the poorest treatment results.
At MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a
therapist, keeps patients for the shortest periods, and has a
higher proportion of the population classed as schizophrenia,
reports the best treatment results,
In the absence of independent criteria for the quality
of care or the assessment of comparability of populations for
degree of illness among the institutions, these findings do not
reflect the relative therapeutic efficacy of the institutionso
Since the evaluations are based on the institution's own ratings,
we believe that the differences reflect variations in the criteria
used for evaluation of improvement rather than intrinsic psychi-

atric characteristics.

In our initial Hillside study (4) it was postulated
that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons
of different social background° It was suggested that the higher
the person's social background the more complex the criteria em—

ployed° This has been literally confirmed in the present study,
with the staff of Menninger Hospital using a tripartite rating
compared to the global rating of the other two institutionso Even
considering the syndrome rating on which our comparative statistical analyses were based, it is our contention that for lower class
persons we are apt to assess improvement in relation to symptom
relief or the patient's capacity to resume work, while for upper
class persons the criteria emphasize such complex intangibles as
"developing insight," or "working through one's problems."
While these investigations have again demonstrated the
role of social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been greatly impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational

�leadership and the expectation that the recorded variables would
clearly defined. But differences in institutional style made
to obtain comparable data. This experience is a cue
difficult
it
to the problems of the conventional use of comparative statistics,
especially in the evaluation of psychiatric therapieso The use of
discharge ratings, diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria in therapeutic evaluations or the iden—
tification of comparable populations are subject to extensive error
unless the institutions are clearly matched for staff attitudes and
style as well as social class patterns in patient populationsc
These difficulties also extend to the failures of scientists to
confirm clinical or laboratory observations made in other labor—
atories, for the lack of confirmation may reflect differences in
populations and psychiatric criteria as much as errors in the original hypotheses. The use of the terms "schizophrenia" or "psycho—
neurosis" to explore changes in psychological and biological features of mental illness has led to a science burdened by negative
resultsa Even were a valid observation to be reported from one
laboratory today, we do not have the methods to describe psychiatric
populations adequately for a satisfactory test of the hypothesis.
Increased attention must be paid to the classification of subjects
by "objective" criteria rather than our present methods, so highly
dependent on institutional and observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the therapist—patient interaction,
be

�-10_

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Population characteristics, defined by social class,
and F score, were related to treatment variables
education
age,
in three voluntary teaching hospitals. Treatment variables in~
cluded type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis
and discharge evaluationo Inter-institutional differences were
observed in patient social class, years of education and distri—
bution of California F scores, but not age.

variations in treatment characteristics among
significantly different in the predicted di—
rection. The institution serving upper class patients did have
the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, a lower
proportion of patients receiving somatic forms of therapy, and
the poorest discharge ratings among the three institutionso
a-Similarly, the institution serving lower class patients did have
the Shorter periods cf hospitalization, lower proportions of
The

institutions

were

psychoneurotic diagnoses, and the better discharge evaluations,

These variations in psychiatric practices followed a
with the social class differences among the inconsistent
pattern
and
are not regarded as idiosyncratic.
stitutions
Such differences in institutional style make comparisons
of diagnoses, duration of hospitalization and treatment results
between institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more
objective criteria for the classification of psychiatric popula-

tions is

emphasizedo

�REFERENCES

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.

J.

and

Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality. Harper and
Brothers, New York, 1950, 990 pp.

.

and Redlich, F. C. Social Class and
Community Study. John Wiley and Sons,
Illness:
New York, 1958, 442 pp.

Hollingshead,

Mental

Inc.,

A. B.
A

.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Factors in
the Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital.
J. Hillside Hosp., 1957, 6: 216—228.

.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack,

and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic
Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental
Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and
Diagnosis. Arch, Gen Psychiat., 1959, 15 565—574.
M.

Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social Attitude (Ca1—
ifornia F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J4_Akuabhlkuugkjlui.,
1960, lﬁQ: 187—192.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M. Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital. Amari_Jm_EﬁxnhiaL., 1959, 116: 127-132.

Siegel, N. H., Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Social
Class, Diagnosis and Treatment in Three Psychiatric Hospitals.
Social Problems, 1962, lg; 191—196.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive Reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety Reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality

Alcoholism, Chronic

Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive Personality
Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile.Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo—Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical
Condition At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much

Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�III

TABLE

InterhospitaI

Comparisons

for Sociopsychological Variables

Menninger

Hillside

N

(87)

(133)

1

31%

7%

Hospital

Social

Class

Massachusetts
Mental Health
Center

Hospital

(72)

3%

11

51

20

28

III

17

34

13

,

1v

1

34

28

v

0

5

28

x2 = 121.5; df=8: p:&lt;.001

Age

N

(100)

(173)

”(95)

&lt; 20

19%

19%

15%

20—39

59

‘58

52

40 +

22

23

33

:

x2 =

=~

32%

41%

12-15

54

51

49

16+

23

17

10

7

=

(91)

9.7; df=4; p&lt;.05

(92)

(163)

(7%)

10-29

51%

33%

20%

30—49

41

50

38

8

17

42

N

s °°re

“——

23%

x2

F

—=

(173)

-&lt;12

Education

-——'———“:=;=

(100)

N

Years of

3.9; df=4; p=n.s.

50—70

1

x2 =

39.2; df=4; p&lt;.001

�TABLE

IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
iMenninger

Hillside

(100)

(173)

Hospital

N

Type of

Psychotherapy

Treatment Somatic
Other
X2 =

Duration
0?

Hospital—

lzat1°n

Hospital

Massachusett
Mental Health
Center
(89)

21%

36%

24%

43

64

68

36

—-

8

82.8; df=4; p(.001

N

(100),

(173)

(95)

*7 months

22%

27%

67%

13

42

27

65

31

5

7—11

months

511 months

Xzf 90.6; df=4' p&lt;.001
N

Recovered,

Much

Improved

Discharge

Evaluation Improved
Unimproved
XZ'=
N

Schizophrenia

Discharge
Diagnosis Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and

Personality Disorder
x2 =

(99)

(172)

(88)

1%

23%

28%

80

62

61

19

15

10

29.3; df=4; p&lt;.001
(95)

(171)

4185)

43%

52%

54%

5

22

17

52

26

29

23.8; df=4; p&lt;.001

�Duration of Hospitalization
By Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Age.

Menninger

Hillside

81

42

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

3O

40—49

30

20

50+

36

Below 20

MMHC

l4

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2734">
                <text>Sociopsychologic aspects of psychiatric treatment in a voluntary mental hospital: duration of hospitalization, discharge ratings, and diagnosis. AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1959 Dec;1:565-74.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2735">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2736">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-42-008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2737">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2738">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2739">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2740">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2741">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of General Psychiatry December 1959, Vol. 1. pp. 565—574</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2742">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2743">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74476">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81037">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87598">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94159">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="278" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="69">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/d30b69ef69a8cf00c194481df0db03be.pdf</src>
        <authentication>468179c0544d033b07449c4407b71b92</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100695">
                    <text>Reprinted from THE

JOURNAL OF

Volume

130,

NERvots

AND MENTAL

DIsEAsE

No. 3, March 1960

Printed in (ISA.

SOCIAL ATTITUDE (CALIFORNIA F SCALE)
AND CONVULSIVE THERAPY
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,1 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.

.

,\—

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

improved was most likely in those who were

Studies of the mode of action of convulsive
therapy in altering behavior have been under
investigation by a variety of experimental
methods in our laboratory for several years.
Early studies demonstrated a relationship
between clinical evaluations of improvement
and the degree of altered brain function as
measured by the amobarbital test (15) and
the electroencephalogram (5). Personality
patterns related to a favorable therapeutic
outcome have been deﬁned by family interviews (13) and projective techniques (14).
Behavioral changes have been measured by
complex visual and tactile perceptual tasks
(6) and by analyses of changes in syntactical
aspects of language (12).
More recently we have become increasingly aware of the relation of sociopsycho—
logical factors to differences in both referral
for, and response to, convulsive therapy. In
a study of the entire adult iii-patient population of Hillside Hospital it was found that
those patients referred for convulsive therapy were signiﬁcantly older, more likely to
have been foreign-born, had less education
and higher scores on the California F Scale
than those patients who received psychotherapy alone (17). Of those patients receiving convulsive therapy, a favorable therapeutic evaluation of recovered or much

older, more poorly educated, foreign—born
and with higher F scores (18).
The aim of the present investigations was
to study the convulsive therapy process further by the use of the California F Scale (1).
Although promulgated in a setting where
interest was focused on prejudice and au—
thoritarianism, the F Scale was designed to
evaluate psychological aspects, such as con—
ventionalism, rigidity and stereotypy, related to the manifestation of these social

attitudes.

It was our

speciﬁc purpose to determine:
1) what the F Scale measures in a psychiatric
population, and 2) how response to the F
Scale varies with change in brain function.
METHOD

Population: These studies have been conducted at Hillside Hospital, a private, nonproﬁt 200-bed psychiatric hospital in New
York City admitting voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental illness.” Psychoanalytically—oriented psychotherapy is the
treatment of choice for all patients, with
somatic therapies (convulsive, insulin coma
and drug therapies) regarded as ancillary,
but available when needed. The in—patient
population consists mainly of middle-class
Jewish patients, with a high school education. between the ages of 18 and 40. Most
patients are classiﬁed into the diagnostic
categories of schizophrenia, psychoneurosis,
manic-depressive and involutional psychosis.
In these studies we have used a ten-item
modiﬁcation of the standard F Scale (8).

Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, Long Island, New York.
This investigation was supported in part by grants
M-927 and MYw2092 from the National Institute of
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, U. S.
Public Health Service. This paper derives from a
presentation given at the Annual Meeting of the
Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia,
1

April, 1958.

187

�188

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

TABLE 1
Scores on Conventional and “Reverse” F Scales
Dichoto—

(grilled
I‘OU p S

M

chzi:

iN

Cpnv erll—
iona
Scale

hi3:

‘Reverse”'

_

Diff.

t

51.5
48.1

+25.2
+0.7

20.3*

:
Scale

I

10—37
38—70
*

79'
Signiﬁcanti
_

at

.001

0.6

level

The procedure consists of having the subject
read ten statements and indicating to what
extent he agrees or disagrees with each, i.e.
a little, pretty much, or very much. The
score for each item ranges from one to seven,
and the total score range is 10 to 70, with
high scores indicating greater agreement
with the statements. The statements are
extreme, uncritical or stereotyped expres—
sions, such as: “No sane, normal, decent
person would ever think of hurting a close
friend or relative” and “If people would talk
less and work more, everybody would be
better off.”
RESULTS

ment with the statements. In contrast, the
patients who made high scores initially
showed little change on retesting, indicating
that they agreed with the statements to the
same extent even when their meanings were
reversed.
Change in F Score with convulsive therapy.
In a second study, 69 consecutive hospitalized patients referred for convulsive therapy
were given the F Scale in the week prior to
treatment, on the day following the 12th
treatment, and two weeks after the termination of treatment. These patients were divided into two groups; an experimental
group of 59, and a control group of ten patients randomly selected from the referrals.
In the experimental group all patients received grand mal convulsive therapy, while
the control group received subconvulsive
electro-stimulation only. All patients were
treated three times a week, for a minimum
of 12 treatments.
The degree of physiologic change during
treatment was determined by quantitative
analyses of delta activity in the EEG, using
techniques previously described (5). EEG
records were obtained weekly and the records taken nearest the 12th treatment were
measured for the degree of induced slow
wave activity (the per cent time occupied by
waves of 6 cps or slower for 66 seconds of
recording from the anterior temporal—vertex
leads).
The changes in F score during convulsive
treatment are shown in Table 2. There was
a mean increase of +5.7 in F score during

What the F Scale measures in this population: the “reverse” F Scale. In this study the
entire in-patient population was ﬁrst tested
with the conventional scale, then retested
one month later with a “reverse” scale (2).
In the “reverse” scale the same items are
used, but stated in opposite terms to the
original. Thus, the ﬁrst example cited above
is changed to read, “A sane, normal, decent
person might have to hurt a close friend or
relative.” The “reverse” scale is scored in
the same manner as the regular scale, with
TABLE 2
Eﬁect of Convulsive Treatment on F Score
high scores reflecting greater agreement.
The relation of the scores on the convenMean F Score
tional to the “reverse” scales is shown in
N
PreTable 1. The patients were divided into two
Mean
During
t
Treatment
Difference
22:?
the
to
median
groups according
score on the
conventional scale. Those patients who made
Convulsive 59 45.3
51.0
2.02*
+5.7
low scores initially, indicating predominant
Group
10
48.7
disagreement with the statements, showed a Control
49.2
+0.5 0.02
Group
signiﬁcant increase in score on the “reverse”
*
scale, indicating that they were now in agreeSigniﬁcant at .05 level

�189

SOCIAL ATTITUDE AND ECT

treatment, a difference signiﬁcant at the ﬁve
the
of
conﬁdence.
In
level
cent
contrast,
per
control group showed a statistically insigniﬁcant change during the same period.
The effect of convulsive therapy on the F
score was further demonstrated by an analysis of seven patients, originally in the control group, who were subsequently placed on
a regular course of convulsive therapy. On
retest after 12 control treatments their scores
were unchanged, with a mean difference
from the pretreatment score of +0.1. After
12 convulsive treatments, however, these
patients showed a signiﬁcant mean increase
of +9.1.
Adequate EEG records at the time of the
12th treatment were obtained for 54 patients. For this analysis the records were
divided into two groups according to the
degree of slow wave activity: a high delta
index group in whom slow wave activity
appeared in 40 per cent or more of the
selected leads, and a low delta index group
in whom the slow wave activity was less than
40 per cent. Changes in F scores during treat—
ment for the two groups are shown in Table
3.

TABLE 3
Change in F Score and Degree of Induced Cerebral
Dysfunction
Mean
Treatment Treatment Difference
Pre-

During

27

43.9

52.5

+8.6

23*

27

45.6

49.0

+3.4

0.8

Degree of Slow
Wave Activity

High Delta
Index

Low Delta

Index
*

15

Signiﬁcant at .05 level

The patients with high degrees of slow
wave activity had a mean increase in F score
of +8.6, signiﬁcant at the ﬁve per cent level
of conﬁdence. Those patients with low delta
indices showed a relatively small increase of
+3.4. While the increase in scores in the
low delta activity group was statistically
insigniﬁcant, it was greater than that of the
control group (Table 2).

TABLE 4
Pre-Treatment and Post—Treatment F Scores
Pre—

Post—

21

42.2

40.6

—1.6

0.4

16

42.6

42.1

—0.5

0.1

N

High Delta
Index

Low Delta

Index

.Mean
Treatment Treatment Diﬂerence

I

F scores were obtained in 44 patients two
weeks after the last treatment (Table 4).
The mean difference between pre— and posttreatment scores was statistically insigniﬁcant. Furthermore, the same pattern of a
small decrease in score was found for both
the high and low delta activity groups.
DISCUSSION

These observations demonstrate the relevance of the F Scale to the convulsive ther—
of
these
An
understanding
apy process.
relationships requires examination of the psychological factors reﬂected by the F Scale in
our population.
The observations on the “reverse” F Scale
indicate that those patients who disagreed
with the original statements (low F score)
were responding to the content of the state—
ments. This was shown by the high degree
of agreement with the reverse statements.
Those patients who agreed with the original
statements (high F score), however, continued to agree when the statements were
reversed. Evidently, these patients were not
responding to the content of the statements,
but demonstrated a more generalized reac—
tion.
There have been several studies on non—
psychiatric populations using a “reverse” F
Scale, with conﬂicting results. Thus, Chris—
tie, Havel and Seidenberg (3) have found a
consistent response to content in original and
reverse scales, e.g., agreeing to one and disagreeing with the other, while Jackson, Messick and Solley (10) report a positive correlation between agreement on the two scales.
In part, these differences may be accounted
for by differences in the form of the reversed

�190

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

scale. Jackson and Messick (9) indicated
that Christie ct al. (3) modiﬁed the language
form of the original scale and reversed the
content, while Jackson et al. (10) retained
the extreme, cliché—ridden style of the origi—
nal scale. Jackson and Messick indicate that
the response pattern to the F Scale may be
interpreted in terms of response style rather
than speciﬁc item content. On the basis of
the data from our population there is a
difference between the high and low scorers

with respect to the extent that cognitive
style affects their response. The high scorers
who agree with both forms of the scale show
a consistent style of response acquiescence,
overgeneralization and conforming to so—
cially desirable standards. Those who scored
low on the original scale, however, did not
show the converse—a consistent pattern of
negativism or social non-conformity. Rather,
they altered their style to agree with the con—
tent when the statements were reversed.
Thus, low F score patients were characteristically more critical and discriminating
persons, While those with high F scores were
more undifferentiating and stereotyped in
their reactions.
With this conception of the F Scale, the
ﬁndings in convulsive therapy may be considered. In the selection of treatment in this
institution, those patients receiving convul—
sive therapy had signiﬁcantly higher scores
than those receiving psychotherapy only
(17). That this observation is not simply a
reflection of diagnosis is seen in the differentiation by the F score of the selection of
treatment even among those patients classi—
ﬁed as psychotic depression. The selection of
treatment thus seems related to psycho—
logical processes reflected in the F Scale.
Subjects with high F scores, with stereotypy
of thinking and difﬁculty in introspection,
often present a behavioral pattern incompatible with the establishment of the type of
interpersonal relationships required in psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy.
The favorable evaluations of therapeutic

response to convulsive therapy in patients
with high F scores may be related to personality attributes. The psychological processes reﬂected in the F Scale are similar to
those personality factors previously found
to be related to a favorable response to such
treatment. In structured family interviews
it was observed that the favorably rated
patients had personality patterns characterized as nonempathic, nonintrospective,
nonverbally communicative, and highly conventional and stereotyped, with little imagi—
native or creative capacity (13). Consistent
patterns have been shown in Rorschach
studies indicating that good prognosis is re—
lated to a small number of responses, absence
of human movement and little diversiﬁcation
of content (7, 14).
The F score increases signiﬁcantly with
convulsive therapy with the extent of in—
crease related to the degree of altered brain
function, as measured by the degree of induced EEG slow wave activity. This relation
of change in behavior to physiological change
is an observation that has been consistently
noted in convulsive therapy patients (5).
The increase in F score during treatment
may have been even more marked than
actually observed. Several patients of foreign
birth and little education had maximum or
near maximum scores prior to treatment,
thus eliminating or reducing the possibility
of an increase on retesting.
The change in score with altered brain
function is consistent with previous observations on the behavioral effects of convulsive
therapy. In accord with our conceptual
framework, greater agreement with F Scale
items during treatment is related to increased stereotypy and difﬁculty in discrimination, as well as to increased acquiescence.
This is part of a general process which has
been noted in linguistic, perceptual and
clinical behavioral measures. In their language, convulsive therapy patients show
increased denial, evasion, qualiﬁcation and
use of clichés and stereotyped expressions

�SOCIAL ATTITUDE AND ECT

(12). They also manifest increased repetitiveness of words (11), difﬁculty in complex
visual and tactile perception (6) and ﬁgureground discrimination (16). Clinically, they
are characteristically more compliant and
acquiescent and try to please the examiner
(4).
SUMMARY

A measure of social attitude, the California
F Scale, has been utilized in studies of the

convulsive therapy process. In a voluntary
psychiatric hospital it was noted that patients referred for convulsive therapy had
signiﬁcantly higher F scores than those re—
ceiving psychotherapy only. Among the patients receiving convulsive therapy, those
with the higher initial F scores were evalu—
ated as showing the best clinical results.
With treatment there was a signiﬁcant increase in F score, with the increase related to
the degree of altered brain function. Follow—
ing treatment the scores returned to their
original level.
Comparison of results with a conventional
and “reverse” F Scale demonstrated that
patients with low F scores respond to the
content of the questionnaire, while those
with high F scores showed a generalized
of
the con—
of
independent
agreement
pattern
tent.
These results are interpreted in terms of
the psychological processes measured by the
F Scale. High—scoring patients are considered
to be stereotyped in their thinking and to
have difﬁculty in introspection—behavior
which is incompatible with psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy, rendering
them more liable to referral for convulsive
therapy. With treatment, such patients are
also more likely to develop the language
patterns of denial and use of clichés which
are the cues for evaluations of clinical improvement. The increase in F score with
treatment is comparable to other types of
behavioral change, such as increased acquiesin
ﬁgure-ground
increased
difﬁculty
cence,

191

discrimination, and increased stereotypy of
language.
REFERENCES
1. ADORNO, T. W. ET AL. The Authoritarian Personality. Harper, New York, 1950.
2. BAss, B. M. Authoritarianism or acquiescence?
J. Abnorm. &amp; Social Psychol., 51: 611—623,
1955.
3. CHRISTIE,

R., HAVEL, J. AND SEIDENBERG, B.
Is the F Scale irreversible? J. Abnorm. &amp;
Social Psychol., 56: 143—159, 1958.
4. FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Behavioral patterns
in induced states of altered brain function.
Paper read at Divisional Meeting, Am. Psychiat. Ass., New York, November, 1957.
5. FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Relation of EEG
delta activity to behavioral response in electroshock: quantitative serial studies. AMA
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 78: 516—525, 1957.

M., KAHN, R. L. AND KORIN, H. Effects
of diffuse altered brain function on perception. Internat. Congr. Psychol, Proc., 15:

6. FINK,

238—239, 1959.

7. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M.

Psychological factors affecting individual
differences in behavioral response to con—
vulsive therapy. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis, 128:

243—248, 1959.

J. AND ERLICH, I. Some sociopsychological characteristics of patients and their relevance for
psychiatric treatment. In The Patient and the
Mental Hospital, Greenblatt, M., Levinson,
D. J. and Williams, R. H., eds., pp. 357—379.
Free Press, Glencoe, 111., 1957.
9. JACKSON, D. N. AND MEssroK, S. J. Content
and style in personality assessment. Psychol.
Bull., 55: 243—252, 1958.
10. JACKSON, D. N., MESSICK, S. J. AND SOLLEY,
C. M. How “rigid” is the authoritarian? J.
Abnorm. &amp; Social Psychol., 54: 137—140,
8. GALLAGHER, E. B., LEVINSON, D.

1957.

J., FINK, M. AND KAHN, R. L. Com—
munication patterns with altered brain function. J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis., 130: 235—239,

11. JAFFE,

1960.
12. KAHN,

R. L. AND FINK, M. Changes in language during electroshock therapy. In Psy—
chopathology of Communication, Hoch, P. and
Zubin, J., eds., pp. 126—319. Grune &amp; Strat—
ton, New York, 1958.
13. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Personality factors
in behavioral response to electroshock therapy. J. Neuropsychiat., 1: 45—49, 1959.
14. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Prognostic value of
Rorschach criteria in clinical response to
convulsive therapy. J. Neuropsychiat. In
press.
15. KAHN, R. L., FINK, M. AND WEINSTEIN, E. A.
Relation of amobarbital test to clinical im-

�192

KAHN, POLLACK AND FINK

provement in electroshock. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76: 23—29, 1956.

16. KAHN,

R. L., POLLACK, M.

AND

ure—ground discrimination

FINK, M.

Fig—

after induced altered brain function. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol.
In press.

17. KAHN,

R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M. Social

factors in the selection of therapy in a vol—
untary mental hospital. J. Hillside Hosp, 6:

216—228, 1957.

18. KAHN, R.

L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Sociopsychological aspects of psychiatric
treatment. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
1: 565—574, 1959.

,

�Social Attitude (Californin

3

Scale) and convulsivo

Ihornpy
Robort L.Kahn Ph.n., Kn: Polluek Ph.D.
and
ﬂux

rink

H.D.

Dcpurtnont a! Experimentnl Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
61"! 0.1(3' litre, 3.1.
~

IX;

11/10/59

�mu. 1: part, at t» mun run-hum. tannins“.
nuuczym, April, ”58.
3*91‘1
1»
try
at
“.2092
«a
put.
at
um,
an”
“tuna menu» a: mm mu. “an“ Inﬂux“:
of Inn“. was. ”In.“ mm: aunt“.

�3.3111 Attitude and E0!

�Boeial Attitude (Galifornia

I

Scale) and Convnleive

Therapy

Studies of the node of action of convulsive therapy in
altering behavior have been under investigation by a variety
of experimental methods in our laboratory for several years.
Early studies demonstrated a relationship between clinical
evaluations of inproveaent and the degree of altered brain
function as measured by the aaobarbital test (12) and the
electroencephalogram (h). Personality patterns related to a
favorable therapeutic outeone have been defined by fanily
interviews (13) and projective techniques (15). Behavioral
changes have been neasured by eeaplex visual and tactile
perceptual tasks (6) and by analyses of changes in syntactical
aspects of language (16).

recently we have become increasingly aware of the
relation of seeiopsyehelegieal factors to differences in both
referral for, and response to, convulsive therapy. In a
study of the entire adult in-patient population of Hillside
hospital it was found that these patients referred for convulsive
therapy were significantly older, more likely to have been
foreign-born, had less education and higher scores on the
Californi I Scale than these patients who received psychotherapy
alone (17). Of those patients receiving convulsive therapy,
a favorable therapeutic evaluation of recovered er much iapreved
was nest likely in those who were older, aore poorly educated,
foreign-born and with higher 7 scores (18).
Here

�1h. 31: 0: ts. pr.nunt tavcnttanttonl.wun to turtle:
'utniy tho convulntvo thorny: pronoun h: £3. at. or «p.
6.113.231: r Saul. (1). Althotgh prcanllt‘nd 1: a cutting
white tn‘iroat at: located an prtandicc tad luthnrttnrtanxln,
tho I Ital. wt: d-utgnod to it‘lxuto paychcloginnl napocto, such

a: convontilnlltun, rigidity and Itarcnﬁyyy, rclutcd to thy
n;nt£cn#n$t¢n a: tin:- :0aiul attitudes.

I

It wan

OI! apuctltc ptrpnna to

how
und
2)
pnychtatrta
poyuzntiou,
t
acaln 1.210: with Chllg! in brain function.

83:19 acanurul 13

rtiptnao

$0

it. I

naturist. 1) tint tho

�KBIEOD:

Pepnlationt These studies have been conducted at
hillside Hospital, a private, nanoprerit 200 bed psychiatric
hospital in New York City adaitting relentary patients with
Iearly and enrahle aental illness". rPsyeheanalytiosllyu
oriented psychotherapy is the treatment of choice for all
(convulsive,
with
senatie
therapies
patients,
insulin cans
and drug therapies) regarded as ancillary, but available when
needed. The in-patient populatien epneiste mainly of niddleclass Jewish patients, with a high school education, between
the ages of 18 and ho. Most patients are classified into the
diagnostic categories of schieophrenia, psychonenrosis, manicdepressive and invelntienal psychosis.
In these studies we have need a ten its: aeditieation
e! the standard scale (8). The procedure consists of having
the subject read ten stateaents and indicating te‘Whet extent
he agrees or disagrees with each, i.e. a little, pretty each,
or very such. The score for each item ranges tron one to
seven, and the tetal sears range is 10 to 70, with high scores
indicating greater asreenent with the otatenents. The statenente
are extreme, uncritical er stereotyped expressions, such as:
"No sane,neraal, deeent person would ever think or hurting a
close friend or relative‘ and "If people would talk less and
work acre, everybody would be better air.”

�RESELISs

the 1 Scale Heaenree in our Po nlatione The i'ne'nn-ae'“ F Scale
In this stat: the entire in-patient population was tiret
tested with the contentional eeale, then reteeted one nenth
later with a 'reveree' eeib (2). 'In the "reverse" scale the
sane items were need, but stated in opposite terms to the
original. Thus the liret example cited above was ohanged to
read, ”A aane, normal, decent person night have to hurt a
The
close friend or relative."
9reverse'eea1e was scored in
the eane manner as the regular scale, with high score: reflecting
What

greater agreement.
the relation of the eeoree on the conventional to the
“reverse“ eealee 1e ehovn in table I. The patienta were divided
into two group: according to the nedian aoore en the conventional
eeele. Those patiente who node low eeeree initially, indicating
predoninant dieagraeaent with the etatenente, ehoved a significant
innfeaae in score on the 'reveree“ scale, indicating that they
were not in agreement with the statements. In contrast, the
patients who aade high eeoree initially showed little change
on retenting, indieating that they agreed with the etatenente
to the sane extent even when their meanings were reversed.
-u-abﬁooogqﬁ‘mmn—tun‘m

Table I about here
Dun-Qn-uueembebuuﬁua-Oepn.

�TABLE

I

Scar-a on Conventional and 'Rovorao'

Dichotonisod
Graugs

Kcan Scorn

conventional
Soul.
~!_

I ﬁction

noun Score

“levcrao'
Se&amp;lo

Dirt.

.£_
20.3‘

10-37

76

26.3

51.5

+25. 2

36.70

79

h7.h

h8.1

+

”Signitietnt at .001 luvol

0.7

0.6

�.5-

I

score with cenvuleive theregz.
In e eeoond etody, 69 eoneeoutive heepitelieed petiente
referred for eonvnleive therepy were given the r seele in
the week prior-to treetwent, on the dey following the 12th
treetwent, end two weeke etter the terninetion er treeteent.
Theee pdiente were divided into two groupe,en experimentel
group of 59, end I control group or ten petiente tenderly
selected from the reterrelea In the experieentel group e11
petiente reeeived greed eel oeuvuleive therepy, while the
control group received enbeonvuleive electro-etieuletien only.
All petiente were treeted three tieee e week, for e nininne
Change

e1 12

in

treeteente.

,

physiologic ohenge during ‘lreetnent wee
deterrined by queutitetive enelyeee of delta eotivity in the
EEG, neing teehniquee previoneh deeerihed (h). EEG reoorde
were ebteined weekly end the reeerde token neereet the 12th
treetnent were neeeered for the degree of induced elow were
6
wevee
o:
by
cent
ocoopied
ope or
(the
tine
eetivity
per
elewer for 66 eeeonde of recording from the enterior tenperelvertex leede).
The ehengee in r eeore during oonvuleive treetnent ere
ehewn in Tehb 2. There wee e ween increeee of +5.? in r
eeore during treetwent, e difference eignificent et the 55
level of confidence. In contreet, the control group ehowed
e etetietieelly iheighitioent chenge during the eeee period.
The degree of

�.6.

it.

attics if

nouvnlntvt thorny, an in. r atnvn vat
tnrihur dcnouatraﬁua by a: ina1ruaa if aovoa pattcltug'
originallyjtn the nautrll crux», vi. wart t‘§u¢.u¢ut11 plant:
fﬂtﬁﬁﬁ
33%.:
an
«mutilatvu
of
neuron
$hurtyy.
rcculur
a
a:
13 anntral trunthaut: that: Iqurca utrn tuuhauucu. ‘1‘» a
mans ditftruuao :tcn tut protrcatunut tutti Q3 «9.1 errorn.
Altar 12 nnuvulntvo trtatlcuta, ﬁauuvur, than. ptiiia‘t unavod
:1mm». a: 09.1 anew.

“want u»

tibla

5h

but.

it. its. at

tin 12th irontntat
pﬂttﬂt‘ﬂ. In! $htt tnnlyttn tho Instant

Adogua§a BIB roaorda

var. ubtntnoa tor

a about
3%

Itvtdndjin£o tut nauupo'nno.r¢ina ‘9 it. 1.33%. at Ilia
var. ntilvltyu a high dixﬁc 13am: group‘tn ulna slaw unvrunttvtty Ip’cntod 1n ho: or nor. 0: ti. stlcutod Ionic. Qua
a lll‘lfl‘ﬁ ludax (ran; 1: that th. III! II'. naﬁlvtty u:Xcal than 801. Gianna. in I liﬁvﬂﬂ ﬂ!rtll $2¢usnoat fur
ﬁt. in. groups .9. shut: in rabid 3.

warn

‘

.C'OOUMﬁOWQ‘ﬁQD‘OOO‘

Inhla 3 thont but.
ﬂ. “’.*“*Q*&amp;.*QOOQQU

In. ytﬁiunta with high 4.3!!!! a:

axon any!

aattvity

had n

o: «8.é. significanﬁ tt tho 5! 10'01
at conttdtnnc. than. putianta with 10v 401‘: iadlceu uhluud

lama

ilerillt

1a 9 t¢¢ru

�TABLE 2

Effect of Convulsivo Treatnent

on

r

Score

Raga P Saute

1

Pre~

treatnont

During
Treatment

Convuluive Group

59

h5.3

51.0

control Group

10

h8.7

h9.2

‘ Significant at

.05 lovcl

noun

Difference 3
+ 5.7
2.02*
+

0.5

0.02

�TABLE 3

Chan 0

in

r

Scare and

chroo or
31.u Huvc ctivit

De

roe o: Induood Cor-bral
Pro»

‘g

During

front-out rroatnont

D

stunctioa

noun

Differenco

t

ligh molt. Index

27

h3.9

52.5

+8.6

2.3“

Lov'nolta Indox

27

h§.6

h9.0

+3.h

0.8

G

Significnnt 1t .05 level

�-1-

relatively small inereuso of +3.h. Hhilo the increase
in scores in the low delta nativity group was stutiatioally
insignificant, it ran grout-r thtn that or the control

a

(table 2).
1 score: were abtainod in hh patient: two racks utter
the 1tat troatnnnt (T‘ble h). The noun ditfcrnnec botvccn
pro~ tad ponttruatncnt scorcs ﬁll statistically insignifictnt.
Furthermore, tho 5.30 puttsrn or a 3:111 door-nae 1n acor$gw
found
1nd
both
the
for
high
delta totittty group:
v:a
graup

.--Q-‘-~-"-..-ﬂﬁﬁ-..
Table h thout hora

.‘..--*-‘Cﬂ-‘-‘-~‘-ﬂ‘

�an:
t

Index

Low

Delta

Indox

ttrontncnt

1

Score:

Prc~

Pout—

Kean

Trautnent

Trontnent

Difference

21

h2.2

h0.6

16

h2.6

h2.1

3|

High Delta

h

~1.6

«0.5

0.1

�DISGU8SION:

These observations demonstrate the relevance of tho

to the oonvnleivo therapy proooea. in understanding
of theeo relationships requiroe oxanination of the payoholegioal
factors reflected by the 7 Scale in our population.
The obeorvationa on the reverse F scale indicatee that
those pationte who diaagroed with the original etatonente
(low r eoore) were responding to the content or the otatonente.
Thie nae shown by the high degree or agreement with the rarer-o
statoaente. However, thoee patiente who agreed with the
original etatononto (high I eoere) continued to agree when
the etatenente were revereed. Evidently, these patient:
were not reephnding to the oontent e! the atatonente, but
deaenatrated a noro generalised reaction.
There have been several otudioo on nenpeyohiatrio
populations neing a reverse I soelo, with conflicting reenlte.
Thno, Christie, ﬂoral and Seidonberg (3) have found a coneiatont
roeponeo to content in original and rovoreo ooaloe, o. .,
agreeing to one and disagreeing with the other, while Jackson,
Heeeiok and Selley (9) retort a positive correlation between
agreement on the two eoalee. In part, theoe dittoronooe nay
be accounted for by difference: in the tern of the rovoreod
eoalo. Jackson and Heeeiok (10) indicated that Chrietie gt
3;. (3) modified the language fora of the original scale
and reversed the content, while Jaokeon et a1. (9) retained
the extreao, olioho1ridden etyle e: the original eoalo.
Jackson and noeeick indicate that the reeponoo pattern to
7 Scale

�«91-

the 1 Scale nsy be interpreted in terne of response style
rsther then specific item content. 0n the besis or the
dots from our popnlsticn there is s difference between the
high end low scores with respect to the extent thst cognitive
style effects their response. the high scorers who egree
with both ferns or the sonic lion s consistent style of

response ecqniescsnoe, evergenerelisetien end contorning
to secislly desireble stendsrds. Those who scored low on
the originsi sosie, however, did not shoe the converse -.

s consistent psttern or negotivisn or sociel nenvcentornity.
they eltered their style to egree with the content when the
ststononts were reversed. ‘Thns, low I score petients were

cherscteristicsily nore critical snd.decrildnsting persons,
while these with high I scores were norc nndittcrontieting
end stereotyped in their resctione.
With this conception of the r Seth, the findings in

convulsive thorspy may be considered. In the selection or
trectnent in this institntion, those psticnts receiving
convulsive therapy had significantly higher scores then
those recciving psychotherapy only (17). That this observs~
tion is not Just e reflection of diagnosis is seen in the
dittorsntietion by the F score of the selection of trestnent
oven snong those pstients clsssitied es psychotic depression.
The selection of treatment than scone related to poyohologicsl

processes reflected in the

r

Scale.

Subjects with high

I

�-10.
scores, with etereetypy of thinking end difficulty in
introepectien, often preeent a behavioral pattern incompatible
with the eatebliehaent of the type of interpereenal reletien~
ehipe required in peycheanalytically-eriented psychotherapy.
The favorable evaluatiene of therapetic reopenee to
eonvulaive therapy in patienta with high I acoree nay be
related to pereenality attributee. The psychological prov
eeeaee reflected in the I Scale are similar to those
pereonality factors previeuely related to a favorable rcepenae
to each treatment. In structured family intervieea it vat
observed that the faverabl! rated patients had personality
patterns characterised as neuenpathic, conintrespectivc,
nenverbally eeamenicative, and highly conventional and
stereotyped, with little nonnative or creative capacity
(13). Genaistent patterns have been aheen in Rcrachaeh
etudiee indielting that good prognosis in related to a small
number of reepeneee, absence of human movement and little
divereifieatien of content (15; 7).
The F acere increecee significantly with cenvuleive
therapy with the extent of increase related to the degree of
altered brain function, as measured by the degree of induced
EEG slow wave activity.
This relation of change in behavior
to physiological change is an observation that has been
coneietently noted in cenvulaive therapy patients (h).
The increaee in I accre during treataent may have been even

�nere marked than eetnelly observed. Severel patients of
tereignobirth and little edneetion hed retina: er nee:
nexinnn eeeree print to treatment, thne elinineting or
reducing the peeeibility er en increeee en retenting.
The ehenge in eeere with altered brein function is
eeneietent with previous obeervetiene on the behevierel
effects 0: convulsive therapy. In eeeerd with our oeueeptnel
trenewerk, greater egreenent with I Scele items during treete
tent in related to inereeeed etereetypy and difficulty in
dieerininetien, ll velx ee increeeed eeqeieeeenee. rue 1e
preeeee
whieh hee been noted 1n‘11ngn1et1e,
e
e!
general
pert
neeeuree.
and
In their
behavierel
clinieel
perceptual
language, cenvnleive therepy patient: shew inereeeed deniel,
cliche:
end etereetyped
end
er
use
eve-inn, qualification
expreeeiene (16). They elee nenifeet increased repetitiveneee
of words (11), difficulty in aenplex Vienel end tectile per—
eeptien (6) end figureggreund discriminetien (1h). Clinieelly,
eke
they
chereeterieticelly here oeup}1ent end ecqnieecent
and try to pleeee the exeniner (S).

�-12-

annular:
neaenre

e: social attitude, the California 1 Scale,
has been utilised in etadiee o! the convulsive therapy proceee.
In a voluntary psychiatric hoepital it wee noted that patients
referred for oonvnlaive therapy had eigniticantly higher I
A

aoorea than theee receiving psychotherapy only. Anon; the
patiente receiving convulsive therapy, theee with the higher

initial 7 ecoree were evaluated ae showing the beet clinical
reellta. With treatment there waa a significant increase in
r ecore, with the ineroaae related to the degree or altered brain
function. Following treataent the ecoree returned to their;
original level.
comparison of reenlte with a conventional and "reverne'l
r eoale concentrated that low I acore patiente respond to the
content or the questionnaire, while these with high I eoeree
ahowed a generalized pattern or agreement independent of the
content.
There results are interpreted in tern: of the psychological
proceeeee neaenred by the F Scale. High 1 score patients are
coneidered to be aterectyped in their thinking and to have
ditticnlty in introspection ~- behavior whih is incompatible
with peychoanalytioally-oriented psychotherapy, rendering than
acre liable to referral for convnleive therapy. With treatnent,
enoh patients are aleo acre likely to develop the language
patterna of denial and nee o: cliche} which are the one: for
evalnatione or clinical improvement. the inoreaae in I score
with treataont is conparahle to the other types of behavioral

�ohnnxo, such

:-

1n figure—around

of lungntga.

inerouocd noqniouconcc, increased

ditticnlty

disarininntign, tad incroalod stereotypy

�Reference-

1. Aderno, !.H., Frankel—Brunswick, 3., Levin-on, D.J. and
Sanford, 1.3. The Antheritarian Pereonalitz.
Harper, low rerk, 1950.
2. ‘Baee, B. n. Antheritarianion or aeqniooeenoe? J. Abnern.
&amp; scan Pezeho1.,
5;. 611~623, 1955.
3. chriotie, 3., Havel, 3., and Beidenberg, I. II the P
Scale irreversible? J. Abnorn. ﬂee. Pezche1., ﬁg:
I

1h3~1§9, 1958.

Fink, H. and Kahn, R.L. Reletion of EEG delta activity
to behavioral reeponee in electroshock: quantitative
eerial etndiee. 1.x.i. Arch. Henrol. &amp; Po ehiat.,
1Q; 516-525, 1957.

3.2.
and
3ehaviora1 patterno in induced
Kahn,
n.
Iink,
etetee or altered brain function. Paper read at
Diviaional Meeting, Aner. Peyohiat. Lee., low York,
levenber, 1957.
6. Fink, H., Iahn, R.L. and Kevin, 3. Effects of diffuse
eltered brain tnnntien en perception. Proc. 1? Int.
sonar. szohel. Anatordans Northelolland Pnb1.,
V

pp. 238-239, 1959.

Fink, x., Kahn, R.L. and Pollack,

Psychological
factors attenting individual ditteronoee in
behavioral response to convuleive therapy.

J. lorv.

&amp;

lent. Dio.,

M.

128: 2h3~2h8, 1959.

�-2Referancoa

Gallagher, E.B., Ltviason, D.J. and Erlich, I. Some
sociopsycholcgical chaructoriatics of patiants and
their rclavuneo tor paychintric treatnont. In

Groonblntt, 9.5. Lovinlon und 3.x. Williams (Edl.)
The Pttiont und the Hpntnl iosgittl. The Pro. Prosl,
H.

alencoo, 111. pp. 357-379, 195?.
Jack-on, 3.3., Herrick S.J., and Bailey, c.n. 30v “rigid“
is the autharitnrinn? J. Abnorm. soc. Pnzchol. ﬁg:
137~1h0, 1957.

10.

Junk-tn, 9.1. and Herrick, 5.3. content and style in
personality anion-none. Patchol. 3‘11., 2;: 2&amp;3-252,
1958.

11.

antic, 3., Fiat,

R.L. Communication pattorns
with ulterod brain function. J. Harv. &amp; Rent. 313.,
H. and Kuhn,

in prons.
12.

8.1., link, E. 3nd WeinttOin, E.A. Relation of
anobarhital tent to clinical inprovonont in oloctro¢

Kuhn,

shook. A.H.A. Arch. Konrol. Pazchint., 1g. 23»29,
1956.
13.

Inna, 1.1. ind link, x. Personality factor: in bohuvior¢1
response to olootraahook thornpy. J. learn I ehiut.,
l3 h5-h9, 1959.
Inna, R.L., Pellaek, l. £34 rink, H. Figaro-ground
dinorininaticn after indueod ultcrod brain inaction.
A.H.A. Arch.

louroi.,ﬁiu pron:

�15.

rink, H. Prague-tie value at hereohaeh
criteria in clinical response to convulsive therapy.

Kuhn, R.L. and

Paper read

at Bleetreeheck

Reaeareh Aee., san

Francisco, 1958.
16.

Iahn, R.L. and link, H. changes in language during
oleetroeheck therapy. In P. ﬂesh and J. Znhin (Ede.),
Pazehegatholegz et columnieatien. Grune and stratten,

l.‘

Yorke ppe 126‘139e 1958a

R.L., Pellaek, H. and link, H. social tactora 1n
the selection at therapy in a veluntary mental
helpital. J. Hill-1h Hung. Q: nos-:20, 1957.
18. Iahn, n.L., rellaek, H. and rink, u. seexepeyehelexieal
aepeete at ﬁeyehiatrie treatleut. Arch. Gen.
Pezchiat., in press.
17.

Kahn,

�Social Attitude Questionnaire (F Scale)*
Below are a number of‘statements. For each statement we
want you to give us your personal opinion of'whether you agree
or disagree, and how much.

.3

g

5
8

&gt;3

am

:&gt;

o
(I)

:4

ﬁ
g

&gt;&gt;
+3

43
m

a
{34

m

(D

M

m

r1

9
+2

'H

H
c6

w

0)

3
3

vi
H

8

E

g

5’

S

pm

(D

((3

Q1

L"

w

m
a)

m
a)

m

m

p
’

0
h

w
(6

m

aw

£6

m

better
When

talk less

ho
w

no

a

-H

"-4

rd

0

F1

Pi

F4

F4

F1

+4

H

U

U

...................

and work more, everybody would be

offOOCOICOOOOOQ. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
.

think about

it,

it is

best for him not to
but to keep busy with more cheerful things .......

a person has a problem or worry,

the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determination, and the will to work and fight for family and country ......

What

I

different kinds of people mix together
to protect himself especially carefully
infection or disease from them ...............

Nowadays when so many
so much, a person has

against catching an

crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.......
.
Sex

................... .....................

best teacher or boss is the one who tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to go about it. ...... .

The

.....................

people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow up
they ought to get over them and settle down

Young

People can be divided into two

the strong.... ..... ...
*From

......................

distinct classes: the

weak and

.................. ........................
.

Gallagher, Levinson and Erlich (1957).

Scoring:

I agree very much ....... +7
I agree pretty much.....+6
I agree a little ........ +5

I can't say ............

I disagree very much ....... +1
I disagree pretty much ..... +2
I disagree a little
+3

+h

43

ho
w

.......................................

people would

h

aw

m
-H

5-4

Science has its place, but there are many important things
that must always be beyond human understanding

If

h
a

$4

sane, normal decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation..

No

8

........

$3

as

�Appendix

Social Attitude Questionnaire (F Scale)*
Felow are a number of statements. For each statement we want you
to give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree.
Answer each statement according to one of the following:

I

AGREE A LITTLE

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

I

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY MUCH

1.

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation.
No

2. Science has its place, but there are many important things
must always be beyond human understanding.
3.

If

better off.

that

people would talk less and work more, everybody would be

a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not to
think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

tion,

A.

When

5.

What

and the

the youth needs most is

will to

strict discipline,

rugged determina—

fight for family and country.
6. Nowadays when so many different kinds of people mix together
much, a person has to protect himself especially carefully against
catching an infection or disease from them.
work and

so

7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicaly whipped, or

worse.

is

8. The best teacher or boss
to be done and how to go about

is the

it.

one who

tells

us exactly what

people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down.
9.

10.

Young

PeOple can be divided

the strong.

into

two

distinct classes: the

weak and

-————————————.__.__—_—______
*

Gallagher, Levinson and Erlich (1957).
Scoring: Agreement is scored as +7 (agree very much), +6 (agree pretty much),
and +5 (agree a little); +h for no response or uncertain; +3
(disagree a little), +2 (disagree pretty much), and +1 (disagree
very much). The ten items are summed for a single F—Scale Score.
From

�CONVULSIVE THERAPY PROJECT

—

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, INC.

§gpia1 Attitude Questionnaire

{F

ScaIe)

aha a numbed 05 Atatemcnia. Fox each Ataiemeni we
want you to give uA gout geaéonaﬁ Opinion 05 whethea you agaee
Beﬁow

on

disagree, and

.C.‘

0

how much.

g

much

m

G)

very

H
94

muc

3

&gt;5

JJ
U

little

-

much

4-)

a

H
1—!

pretty

very

CE!

cisagree

agree

say

t
can

I

I

sane, normal decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation. ..... ‘u.......... .....

No

Science has

its place,

.............,...

but there are many important things

that must always be beyond

human

understanding................

If people would talk less and work more, everybody would be
better off....................................................
I

‘

then a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not to
think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things....

I

If
I

the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determina—
tion, and the will to work and fight for family and country...

What

different kinds of people mix together
to protect himself especially carefully
infection or disease from them ..... .......

Nowadays when so many
so much, a person has

against catching an

I

crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse...................
..
Sex

I

......... ...............
.

The

best teacher or boss is the one

is to

be done and

hOW

tells

us exactly what
to‘go about ituu'oonltocconcoct-cocooooowho

Young people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down................

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak

and the strongOIOOIIOOIOOQOOOOOCOOIIOIOOIOIICOOCIOIOOCOOIIOICI

I

“"“'{'
I

i,

i

'

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2774">
                <text>Social attitude (California F Scale) and convulsive therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1960 Mar; 130:187-92.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2775">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2776">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-46-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2777">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2778">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2779">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2780">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2781">
                <text>[Preprint] with questionaire and reprint. Reprint from THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Volume 130, No .3, March 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2782">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2783">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74480">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81041">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87602">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94163">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="279" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="70">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/bf0b6905f6c2b44054f0b8c530666cd5.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b11f5eee6a69d331f4c3c98cd7961516</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100696">
                    <text>Reprinted from the :1. M. :1. Archives of Neurology
May 1960, Vol. 2, pp. 547—551
Copyright 1960, by Aerircm Medical Association

F igure-Ground Discrimination After Induced Altered

Brain Function
ROBERT l.. KAHN, Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D.,

and

Studies of complex visual perception with
altered brain function in man have not always yielded clear or consistent results. The
disagreements may be due to many factors,
such as differences in population studied,
types of procedures employed, and difﬁculties in evaluating the degree of alteration in
brain function. Electroconvulsive therapy
(ECT), however, provides a unique op
portunity for studying the effects of cere—
bral dysfunction in that more accurate
control can be maintained over the degree of
induced cerebral dysfunction and its measurement.
While most investigations of brain—injured
populations have focused on the role of the
locus of the lesion on behavior, current
studies of ECT have emphasized individual
differences. Marked variability has been
shown for perceptual}2 behavorial,7 and
physiologic 5'8 responses to ECT. Various
personality 6'11 and social factors 9'10 have
also been related to differences in response
to treatment.
In the course of an investigation of the
perceptual and behavorial changes with
ECT, a convulsive—subconvulsive control
study was undertaken. In this report, the
performance on complex visual tasks is pre—
sented. Speciﬁcally, the aim was to deter—
mine whether perceptual change induced
by ECT is related to the degree of altered
brain function and clinical behavioral
‘

Accepted for publication Jan. 18, 1960.
From The Department of Experimental Psy—
chiatry, Hillside Hospital.
Presented at the American Psychological Association, New York, August, 1957.
Aided by Grants M-927 and MY-2092 of the
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

MAX FINK, M.D., Glen

Oaks, New York

change, and Whether the pretreatment perceptual pattern is related to physiologic
changes with treatment.
The method used in the study was the
perception of embedded geometric ﬁgures——
a technique which has been employed in recent years in studies of perceptual change
in head trauma and brain tumor pa-

tients.1'“"'14

Method
Population—Fifty-three consecutive patients
referred for ECT were studied. These included 16
men and 37 women, the ages ranging from 22 to
66 years, with a median of 49 years. The patients
were divided at random into two groups. A convulsive group, of 29 patients, received grand mal
electrotherapy with thiopental (Pentothal) premedication three times a week, using either a
Medcraft alternating-current instrument or a.
Reiter C-47 electrostimulator. A minimum of 12
treatments was given. The total number of treat—
1.

ments was determined by the supervising psychia—
trist in charge of the treatment unit on the basis
of clinical criteria. A subconvulsive group, of 24
patients, was treated in similar fashion except that
only subconvulsive stimulation was given after the
thiopental. Fourteen of the subjects in the 'subconvulsive group were subsequently given a regular
course of convulsive therapy.
2. Perceptual Task—In the week prior to treat—
ment and on the day following the 12th treatment
each patient was tested with a modiﬁcation of the
Gottschaldt hidden—ﬁgure test developed by Bat—
tersby et al.1 The subject is presented with a page
containing two forms—a simple geometric ﬁgure,
and below it a complex ﬁgure in which the simple
ﬁgure is embedded (Figure). The patient is
asked to trace a speciﬁc geometric ﬁgure from the
background by outlining it with a colored pencil.
The discriminations range in complexity from
relatively simple to more complex. There are 25
such discriminations. A maximum of two minutes
is allowed for each. Performance is scored in
terms of total number of errors. To minimize
a practice effect, two equivalent forms of the
test were used. The forms were alternated with

77/547

�A.M.A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
Comparisons for Number
of Errorr Before and During EC T

TABLE 1.———Intragr0up

Type of
Treatment
Subconvulsivo
Convulsive

Before
No.
24

43

ECT

During

Differ—

ECT

once

1’

7.7
11.8

~2.3
+2.3

&lt;0.02

10.0
9.5

*

(0.02

Intragroup analyses in this and in subsequent tables are
based on Wilcoxon’s method of paired replicates.
*

Results

\VAVI
‘7"7V
'AL A AL‘
Figures in hidden-ﬁgures test. The preliminary
sample used to acquaint the subjects with the
task is shown in a; b and c are examples of test
ﬁgures. In (1 the task is complicated by having the
subject determine which of the two single ﬁgures
can be found in the complex ﬁgure.
successive patients in pretreatment testing. During
treatment the patient was reexamined with the
form different from that given initially.
3. Evaluation of Physiologic Change. Two
measures of brain function——the electroencephalo—
gram and the amobarbital test15—were given to
each patient prio1 to and at weekly intervals during treatment. The electroencephalogram was
evaluated as to the degree of induced slow-wave
activity according to criteria previously published.5
The amobarbital test was noted as positive or
negative for brain dysfunction according to
standardized criteria}5 The results of these tests
during the second, third, and fourth weeks of
treatment furnished the criteria for physiologic
change. A combined physiologic index was obtained by ascribing to each high—degree slow—wave
EEG record and each positive amobarbital test
a score of one. The range of physiologic altera—
tion thus ranged from 0 to 6.
4. Behavior Ratings.—Each patient’s behavior
was evaluated at weekly intervals. After the 12th
treatment, a rating for the degree of behavioral
change was made according to four classes:
marked, moderate, minimal, or none. These ratings
of change were not value judgments as to the
quality of change but, rather, quantitative estimates
of differences in behavior patterns under similar
conditions of observation. Thus, such behavior
patterns as euphoria, paranoia, and withdrawal
might all be rated as equivalent for degree of
quantitative change, although the implications of.
each for the qualitative evaluation of improvement
may be diﬁ'erent.

78/548

The pretreatment and treatment scores
and the mean change in the number of er—
rors with treatment are shown for each
group in Table 1. Intragroup analysis shows
that the subconvulsive group made signiﬁ—
cantly fewer errors during treatment,
whereas the convulsive patients made sig—
niﬁcantly more.
Prior to treatment, subconvulsive patients
made approximately the same number of
errors as those in the convulsive group, a
mean difference of 0.5 error. During treatment, however, the difference between these
bet—
at
signiﬁcant
(4.1
errors)
was
groups
ter than the 1'% level of conﬁdence. When
the data are analyzed with respect to physiologic change, signiﬁcant increases in errors
are found only for those patients with great—
er degrees of physiologic change. This re—
lationship is present in the analysis of the
amobarbital test and the EEG as separate
2,—1ntragroup Comparisons for Number of
Errors Before and After EC T in Relation to
Degree of Physiologic Change

TABLE

3

Mean
Difference
in No. of
Errors
During
Treatment

Physiological Index

N

Amobarbital Test
None or one positive

13

—0.2

Two or three positive
Electroencephalogram
None or one high delta

28

+3.7

23

+1.7

Two or three high delta
Combined Physiologic
0 t0 3

18

+3.3

21

+1.0

20

+3.9

4

to 6

1’

Not
significant
&lt;0.01

Not
signiﬁcant
&lt;0.05

Not
signiﬁcant
&lt;0.01

V 01. 2, May, 1960

�FIGURE-GROUND DISCRIMINATION
3,—Intragronp Comparisons for Number of
Errors Before and During ECT in Relation
to Degree of Behavioral Change

4.—Relation of Pretreatment Errors to
Eventnal Degree of Physiologic Change

TABLE

Degree of
Behavioral Change

Marked
Moderate
Minimal or none

N

Treatment

14
5

——0.4

Physiologic
Change

1’

0
3
5

&lt;0.01

Not signiﬁcant
Not signiﬁcant

indices, and when the two tests are
bined (Table 2).

to 2
and

N
16

4

and 6

19
8

Mean N o. of
Errors

Pretreatment
7.9
11.2
13.3

logic change had frequent difﬁculty following instructions. They would trace the lines

com—

The relationship between the degree of
behavioral change and the change in num—
ber of errors during treatment is shown in
Table 3. Those patients with minimal or
moderate behavior changes did not show
an appreciable difference in number of er—
rors. Those with marked behavior changes,
however, made signiﬁcantly more errors
during treatment.
Analysis of the pretreatment error scores
in relation to the degree of physiologic
change is shown in Table 4. A signiﬁcant
relationship is shown between the pretreatment error scores and the degree of physio—
logic change during treatment. Patients
with minimal physiologic change during
convulsive therapy had a mean pretreat—
ment score of 7.9 errors, while those who
developed marked physiologic effects had a
mean pretreatment score of 13.2. The triserial correlation of pretreatment score and
physiologic change is +0.34, signiﬁcant at
the 0.05 level of conﬁdence.
Qualitative Data—Alterations in size of
ﬁgure or in minor aspects of form were
common types of error during both testing
periods. Certain qualitative patterns were
frequently noted during treatment, which
occurred only rarely in the pretreatment
period. It was common for patients to
make no attempt to trace the more complex
ﬁgures. This failure was often associated
with a generalized withdrawal reaction in
which theipatient was unresponsive to any
stimulus or procedure. Others became hos—
tile and negativistic toward the testing.
Patients with the greatest amount of physio—
Kalm ,et al.

During Treatment

Mean Difference
for Number of
Errors During
+3.6
+1.0

24

TABLE

indiscriminately, without regard for the
speciﬁc ﬁgure to be traced, repeat a previous
ﬁgure despite changes in the test ﬁgure,
draw lines where none actually existed, and
attempt to trace the stimulus ﬁgure while
ignoring the more complex test ﬁgure. Such
patients were likely to respond quickly and
impulsively, and showed little concern about
making an error even when spontaneously
commenting, “I know that’s not right.”

Comment
This study demonstrates a relationship
between the degree of cerebral dysfunction
and the degree of perceptual alteration as
measured by errors on the embedded-ﬁgures
test. Patients with subconvulsive stimulation
made fewer errors on retesting. Patients
receiving convulsive therapy, in whom only

minimal physiologic changes were recorded,
manifested slight increase or no change in
errors. The convulsive patients, however,
with the more marked physiologic altera—
tions, showed a signiﬁcant increase in

‘

errors. This interrelationship of brain func—
tion and perception may be related both to
the perceptual patterns with neurologic dis—
orders and t0 the mode of action of con—
vulsive therapy.
It is evident that perceptual responses
systematically vary with the degree of dif—
fuse cerebral dysfunction. In relating these
patterns to concepts of localized pathology,
the role of generalized, nonspeciﬁc cerebral
dysfunction must be considered. For ex—
ample, unilateral spatial “inattention,” fre—
quently attributed to parietal lobe lesions
alone?!4 has been reported with a variety
79/ 549

�AM. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
of lesions provided there was a somato—
sensory defect and an associated generalized
mental impairment."""16 Teuber and Wein—
stein 1“ found that performance on an em—
bedded—ﬁgures test was unrelated to locus
of lesion in cases with penetrating brain
wounds, but that aphasic patients made
signiﬁcantly more errors than a nonaphasic
group. Pollack et al.,13 using a test identical
with that in this study, reported no rela—
tionship between errors and the location of
lesion in tumor patients. They noted, instead, that the number of errors was related to the severity of general mental
changes, manifested as disorientation for
time and place. The present observation
that perception of embedded ﬁgures is re—
lated to the degree of diffuse brain dys—
function is in accord with these studies of
patients with head injuries and brain tu—
mors.
In previous investigations of the mode
of action of convulsive therapy, we have
shown that clinical behavioral change is
related to the degree of altered brain func—
tion.5'7'8 The present study reinforces this
observation, the objective criterion of per—
ceptual errors being used as an index of
behavioral change. As a group, the patients
who showed the greatest increase in errors
with treatment were those who also showed
the most pronounced change in clinical behavior, as assessed by conventional psychiatric evaluation.
There appeared to be considerable comparability in the type, as well as the degree,
of clinical behavioral change and the quali—
tative aspects of performance on the em—
bedded-ﬁgures test. Failure to attempt the
task characteristically accompanied with—
drawal or paranoid hostility. A lack of con—
cern in correcting errors was associated
with clinical euphoria or hypomania. From
these behavioral observations, the increases
in errors may be attributed to a change in
attitude toward the task or examiner, as
well as to a speciﬁc defect. The altered
brain function modiﬁed the total pattern of
interaction with the environment, of which
80/550

the performance on a complex perceptual
task is just one aspect.
Previous studies have shown that there
is a relationship between the clinical response
to convulsive therapy and aspects of personality, deﬁned as the habitual or characteristic
modes of response and adaptation.“v1°'11 In
this study it has been shown that the pretreatment perceptual performance is related
to the physiological response during treatment. This ﬁnding suggests that the indi—
vidual differences in the development of
physiologic change may also be related, in
part, to personality factors.

Summary and Conclusion
Fifty—three consecutive patients referred

for electrotherapy were studied before and
after treatment on their ability to perceive
embedded geometric ﬁgures. An experimental group of 29 patients received a
course of grand mal therapy with thiopental
(Pentothal) premedication. A control group
of 24 patients received submnvulsive stimu—
lation with thiopental premedication only.
The experimental group made signiﬁcant—
ly more errors after treatment than did the
controls.
Within the experimental group there was
considerable variability. Increase in errors
was signiﬁcantly related to the degree of
altered brain function and to the degree of
behavioral change.
Qualitative aspects of perceptual behavior mirrored the pattern of behavioral change
observed clinically.
Pretreatment error scores were signiﬁ—
cantly related to the degree of altered brain
function developed during treatment. The
signiﬁcance of this observation in terms of
personality factors is indicated.
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital.

REFERENCES
l. Battersby, W. S.; Krieger, H. P.; Pollack,
M., and Bender, M. B.: Figure-Ground Discrimi—
nation and the Abstract Attitude in Patients with
Cerebral Neoplasms, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 76 2369, 1956.
Vol. 2, May, 1960

�FIGURE-GROUND DISCRIMINA TION
Battersby, W. S.; Bender, M. B.; Pollack,
M., and Kahn, R. L.: Unilateral Spatial Agnosia
(Inattention) in Patients with Cerebral Lesions,
Brain 79:68, 1956.
3. Critchley, MacD.: The Parietal Lobes, Baltimore, Williams &amp; Wilkins Company, 1953.
4. Cobb, S.: Amnesia for the Left Limbs De—
veloping into Anosognosia, Bull. Los Angeles
Neurol. Soc. 12:48, 1947.
5. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: Relation of
Electroencephalographic Delta Activity to Behavioral Response in Electroshock: Quantitative
Serial Studies, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat.
2.

78:516, 1957.

Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L., and Pollack, M.:
Psychological Factors Affecting Individual Differ—
ences in Behavioral Response to Convulsive
Therapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 1282243, 1959.
7. Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L., and Green, M. A.:
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process,
Dis. Nerv. System 19:1, 1958.
8. Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
Relation of Amobarbital Test to Clinical Improve—
ment in Electroshock, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 76:23, 1956.
9. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
6.

216, 1957.

Kalm cl 0].

Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital, A.M.A. Arch.
Gen. Psychiat. 1:565, 1959.
11. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. Neuropsychiat. 1:45, 1959.
12. Landis, C.; Dillon, D., and Leopold, 8.:
Changes in Flicker-Fusion Threshold and in
Choice Reaction Time Induced by Electroconvul—
sive Therapy, J. Psychol. 41:61, 1956.
13. Pollack, M.; Battersby, W. S., and Bender,
M. B.: Figure—Ground Discrimination in Patients
with Cerebral Tumor, read at Eastern Psychological Association, 1957.
14. Teuber, H. L., and Weinstein, 5.: Ability
to Discover Hidden Figures After Cerebral
Lesions, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 76:
10.

369, 1956.

Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L.; Sugarman,
L. A., and Linn, L.: Diagnostic Use of Amo—
barbital Sodium (“Amytal Sodium”) in Brain
Disease, Am. J. Psychiat. 112 2889. 1953.
16. Weinstein, E. A.; Kahn, R. L., and Slote,
W. H.: Withdrawal, Inattention, and Pain Asymbolia, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 74:235,
15.

1955.

rrmccu’ and l’ublinhed in the United State: 0] America

81/551

��liguruwaruuua ntncrtainn‘aau Artur Induaod
Alsorud Irwin luuat£an

"M‘

In

”I.

than. m ,“1333' "on.
II‘
“‘3 'Ilk Kc”.

$ at Savorinnuinl Payuhaitry. Islanido Ilqpitul.
tron ti.
‘3... 0th, 31$. '0!ttdod I: (933‘! 3‘91? and uz-noya .8 1h: rattanal Igs¢tiutn at
lialﬁh
’ublta
v.3.
Inuﬁttntoa
at
laulth,
Intlnall
Innath,
laatal
Iorvtao.
’rnacutod a! nastiest fartholuntaul inuuctn‘aon. l.!.. luau-S 195?
‘

Vt: 10-59

�11¢."de

nun-mints.” in mt

�Iaaurtocrilnd Dinertllnntiaa Attor~xu¢n¢¢d
llturnd Drain Flaottlu

at

«unplax $111.1 yﬁvucytaau with altartd brain
:buattnn.£n man have lat ulnar: yiuldad Bill! or couuautaut
rsIuZtu. an. dtn‘groanautn
to at. to stay Inn‘oru, than
ﬁtnuxgu

I! dirtbrcncoa

It:

1a populutluu s‘ua1ca, $39.:

a: tools :34

pranocnrna unplayud. and a1:ttou1t1.a In 01.1;‘t13: ﬁlo d:¢vao

a: Iltlritltt 1g bruit minuttaa. llaitrOOOBthttvo thnrupr
(ref). houuvur, prcvs$un u uaaqnt oppurﬁuuaty for 1%‘431nc

it:

vitamin u: ctrubrnl irntinataan in ‘htﬁ no». acouruho
.oltvol tan b. untacntnoa trot tin Cairo. at tndnata corubrul
drutunntaau and its gonnur'nunt.
will. invautiguttann at ﬁrstnntuanrud pdpnIntitnn hnvu
ttauucod 10! it. loot part on ﬁat til. at loéittal‘of logttl
on ht$aviur. nurroat ltultan at an! hurt taphutitad its
manna
rum- .3 manna:
a»

«mm...
mun“:
ton aim-n m- unupm; (a), “man: (h). and pmwmun
(2.5) vtnpauttu ‘0 not. In Iﬁdl‘iia, Virii‘l portounlity (3)
and loclal luster: (6.?) ﬂat. bat: rolntud ﬁoldtttortasau 1n
rtuponno $0 ‘rcntuunt.
In it. «attic a: la invautttgtSOI at ‘3. yorunptnnl :36

tchavtavuz thungca with Int. n.Iauvulotvo~osboouvnlutvo
unailwz .5343 cat Indurtaktg. In ‘hiu roport. sh: partorunuca
an outwit: vtnunl Qtakt it praaautud. splattaually, tho .1:
83' to ﬁattrnino utnﬁhnr purcoytlnl thing. iﬂdlﬂid up new it
um suntan
or
an
behavioral «minute and uhtilnr it; pvctrttﬁlnnt yarotpinul
pttiurn is roxaind ﬁt plytitltciu chance: with troatannt.

“um u

«m;

nuns um “um:

�4".

m ”and uni

1a

a.

menu “mun “mu

and; m
«-

a

Mini:

m ”In"!!! at
which

bu tun

unity“ a mum you: 1: than 0: ”run“: WI
a: um ”um «I be“: Wu:- nﬁnh (1, 0. 16).

�m:

1) gagglggﬁggo rttﬁy-£hrcc coal-cuttvc putt-mt. martyred
for In! rare s‘n4114. 230.0 includcd 16 no: and 37 Human.
I1¢h n30: ranging tram 1! to 66 utth a Isltil at £9 rinru.
A
«111604
tun
rauduu
gronyn.
I!» patttutc var.
at
tat.
can'tzntvo grin: or I? pntlnuta too-:vud [kind In: olonﬁrnu
'

thorlpy'vttb ponto‘hnl pronndsuattln ﬂhrco'ttnna a aver.
tutu; utﬁhar a lcdnrttﬁ t1tarna$¢u¢ entrant tustrllnnﬁ or u
A
e-hv
olcc‘ruotSunlntar.
mitt-I: at 1! ‘tOﬂﬁlII‘l
lattir
IaturIAnoa
nmahar
so$a1
troutnoi‘n
c:
given.
III
It:
rut.
by

it.

any-twining

,lrahlutvtlt

an churxo

at

‘ho truntncu‘

A
01
nubcaavnlltv:
owls-via.
01:110.;
basis
unit 9» ti.
(was: a: th patients van truttcd 1: nihilnr t‘nhina, uxcapi

that only unbcouvuloivc a‘tln1n§1¢u van given following $30
polbthal. rbnrtctn of thy lubaoatavtn tho InbouthI-iva grin;
wort cuinnq13ntly':1vun a rcgnlnr coura- ot couvulatvn tharupy.
itch prior ﬁo-‘roctutut and
I) £2:ggg§3g§_§gg§u In

it.

it.

any tullantnc ‘5. 12‘3
ﬁction vtﬁh a nultttatttaa of

nu

tritiuunt can) pa‘taut an:

hiddun
£1113!
oottaohnll‘
it.
to.‘ dovulopo‘ by Itt‘orlby'3§_g§,(1). III Ittjltt is
prouontod with I page containing two torn. ¢ a usual. cut-n$rtnl
which
QIH’XQI
and
in
holov
1‘
in. atlulc ticuro
a
tantru,
Illlft
an ouhcdnod (11;. 1). tbs passlnt :- .akod ‘0 ﬁrst. I apoottio
goo-attic ttxuro tram tin inchcrcund by outlining 1t vl‘h t
col-rut 903.11. It: altars-tuition: range in noupluxaty :90.
—-.‘q--_

313. 1
Cunﬁoodu

�~h~

such
:5
tr.
diucrtuiautioun. a .311!!! at tun uluuton 1. ullnuod tor
onah. Portarnnaco as :¢¢rud in turn: 0: ﬁnial lllbir a: aurora.
lb i181l1‘¢ a prautttn Itruct $ro tqslvaloaﬁ lawn. a: $3. iau£
any: unod. 2h. torn: var. nltaruntut vi‘h Inactnuav. yuttcu‘n

ttlnttvaly ainplt ta hart couplux. that:

“prawn-u ”um. mm: What a. ”unﬁt m ”umuu an» m an autumt tun um um mum”.
3)

_

.

.NMV

.

,Jﬂ

,7

run Inalurol

at

ﬁrst: Stuntiou . tun cluatrnoacaphnlogrna and st. nasbattxtil
taut (11) '0'. ctvuu in itih puttnnt grist in. uni at vigil:
‘1uﬁcrvu1n airing tronﬂnnut. 13. n1..tuuunaophn1&amp;¢run In:
tvdlnntid .- to th: dsxtno ct tutucod delta activity tcgor¢1nu
to ctttcrtt prcvtoully publishud (s). Thu nuabarbttal tout
nogn%1vu
brain
utt¢¢
for
or
pouttivc
lycttnatiuu
a.
It.
uncaritng t. ntsudnr¢1Qid critoria (11). it. rattlta u: this.

during sh. sonata. third tad rourtb itch; of ironing»:
turntlhod tho critcrin tar phwutolocacal litill. A «onhiuad
'Bhrlltltxtﬁil $34.: was obtntnud by usarihtn; to oath high
inure. Salt. Ila UQIOIC nut 05:! poattiv. anotnrhttal tnnﬁ a
lanai a: nut. 1h. rang. at phwitaloatcnl a1&amp;nrat1nn thuu

test:

ruagnd tron
h)

atra'io nix.

la

tr

*1:

It

Bash pctaauﬁ's hchnvtor

In.

cvnlnatud 3‘ wtokly intarvals. Artur ‘3: 12th trcn‘uant, a

rtttal for it.

dugvnu

a: bnhtvinral thing.

It:

and. ¢os.vdll¢

ta tan! clnsucut unwind, nod¢rnto. Iantunl or menu. Th...
rating: at «hang. vura ant VIII. audgnnnutu ta ta tho unaatty

�.5.

u “than“

in“ “my «unaba- uuntu‘
in boinvtov pu‘tnrau unit: tintlar mandatsana at uhocrv.‘10u¢
than. tuch‘bolnvtur psi$urua nu «upharsa, viruautn or withdrawn: usgl‘ .11 ha astod as aqutvnlcnt to: ‘OCIOI u:
an minute“ or out
chum.
thy qunlt£nttvu cvnluutsna a: tlprcwuuuat um; to dartornut.

at

than,

wanna“

am»

in

�mu»

nud-truatnoét
ae¢r¢t uni tic luau
:3. pretrtatuaut
¢hanzc in *5. 31:30! at or!.ra I1$h trnntutnt Ara uncut {ﬁr
caah group in 1.31. X. Intrusrtur‘uaalyaas that: thus tho
,Ititotvalaiva crazy aqdn utgnitivnntly tenor ovroro aartn;
tru¢tnunt, whili thc.uguvultavu pn$1¢atu nun. stun:tt¢n&amp;t11

.

'3’“!
naucc&amp;ao§~

um I

vriur to tvattunat, subconvulnzvu pattout: Inn. upprcun
alnﬁnlr ﬁts can. nuuhur 0: cart»: 1: than: in tho annvula:v&amp;.
autumn of «1:05. Wing trauma
{my vi“ a
hatunda
tiott gran»: (h.1 cfrorn)
«aircrunnn
hosuvwr, t3.

an

m untrumt a

«an: «m an

1::

1m:

or

wanna“.

Intlywod tit) racpoe‘ to phyiiclazit cunnsc,
utsutrlnuut xgcrtnuoa in error. art taunt out: ta than. pittnntu
ut‘h 31.3%.! diurnal at plrltuloxin ohnagt. 2&amp;1: rwluisunuhtp
anabnrbttll taat and the
it pvuuta‘ tn $hc analyttt or
:36 ﬁt ¢:partta latte... 331 was: tit $20 tact: urn «unbluoi
ﬂﬁnu

tn. data 1:

it.

(Quilt 1!).

“.‘.‘.*..mm it:

fun raltttaauhtp intact: tn. 1032*. 01 bahnv1:rnl chant.
a:&amp;
chtago ta nulkor of «pants dnrtng imattuant-ta inﬂux

ti:
or
a...
an:
«an
m.
”man
“am want.
a

�at?“

bchlviar changcu £1: acﬁ than an uppgoainbio difiaruaeo
untied
bchnwilr chanson,
In author a: Qtfl?Io Shag: with
Errata-It.
«trans
uaAc
crvarn
nuratcnttiolatly
lavorur,
&gt;

tn‘woum
143%! 111

rnlnﬁtou
tin
arctroa‘I'It atttr
1:11:31. at
1n
17.
thunk
chango
ta
tail!
of
phauanlaciuul
in tin ducts.
roloﬁtkunhtp
hetuuuu
tin
prothan
uttnttlaaaﬁ
a
result.
it:

00.9..

$3

phyat;lo¢tou1
change
or
incrno
‘roaﬁlcut crror
chanco
physiological
with
Itatnnl
Pa‘iantu
during trons-ou‘.
a:
had
prntrhﬁﬁnalﬂ
intro
u
than
convulclvu
‘hnrnyy
‘ﬁfll'
anrhad
uh»
phyniulogtoal
duvclaycd
‘30:.
1.! aurora, tail.
ﬁrst-21.1
13.3.
1:.
at
htd
acct.
protr:ntuunt
a
nut:
trtoa$u,
in
rhyrt01131¢nl
«hang:
and
corral-ﬁat. at protvan‘nunt tear.
*33, ttgustaoaut t$ ‘ho .05 lcvul a: canttdtnoo.
”nan-unufllﬁl I?
IOOIOI and 1h»

W

Altamitlcnn In a1:- 01 (aggro or in unit: unpuu‘: of
ha‘h
sot£1n¢
partoiac
taping
arrow
at
annual
typo.
no».
(at:
ear‘atn qualiﬁn‘tvo patiorua turn troqn.ntly'nuta¢ «‘21:;
inuniuaat ho-Ivnt, which oacurrtd our rarely a: to I lancer
alﬁon‘ 1: tin prttrultlun‘ portcd. It vat gonna: for putataﬂu

�mu.
I:
m»:
“I
rum man. m
m

at

1'10th

sun-mun”

mu»
‘

3

auto" m:

mm: :6!

mum“

a
1’.

2B

19.0

.7»?

*2“!

.0!

h)

9.5

11.8

«.3

-.ea

'

my“:
1“"!er
811mm now 0: mm "plant“.

in this and aubuqunt

“nu

band

on

�.

Iu‘rnctunp cuuparlaonn
,1331nataauaa Iran:
Aaszsthéaa!_z:£&amp;
lung or on.

,-

In: lI-bav It Izrnra nut-rt

I Inc:

Bittbrcnoo 1-

13

06.!

,‘Ci‘l’i

:8

‘30?

loan or at.
high «01‘.

23

01.7

pauzttv.
9!. or thrto

turn.
or401%.
ﬁt.
high

3’

Us

and

'IleI

p

Int tinnittaon‘
001

lat lttuttloant

,

'

10

.3.)

33

*1.o

:3

‘30,

.05

lat attaittcunt
.

001

�-W

and
having
Safari
o:
strata
cunpurtllnu
tor_IIuh¢r
In‘rnur1up

angrvo O! lohnvacrnl ﬁlingt
.

litttd

”liturunconilnbﬁr a:
03.6
01.0
~0.h

Eh

lb

locnrato

hiatus: or that

R¢1u$ton

I lat:

x

W
t:

at Pritv‘nﬁnunt tutor.

p

x...

.ﬂl
lot aaanlftcaat

Int atctitlnant

xv'utunx 20;?!0 or rhrltolscidax
72353;; agggg‘ zggggggg
,

W!
9 $0 2
3

'3‘ ‘

I
1‘

70’

I,

11.1

�«a.
to ink: I6 nttcnpt tn tvtau ﬁt. hora cunplcx figures. was.
v.1poncc uga ottou unnaaiatud lith I gsnarnltacd r1tbdrauu1
rcdctlun in witch ‘ha paticnt was unruuponniva $0 an: attnula:
u! pracodura. ethnra b.3335 hua‘tlo and uncuttviuilu touted
it. tasting. ratauntu with th- groaﬁu-t tumult or phytiologtanl
thing. it‘an had ditticllty I‘llivtas tantruc%a.ag. 13¢:
it‘ld in... ‘IC 113.. stalwartntn.tolr I1th¢:§ rognra 1.:
it. #9001113 tigurt‘ic it uttlsutd; rtpousod a pruvitun
txatr‘ doapitc august. 1: ti. #0:: figurn; draw 11:». uhnro
aunt uc$nully Oxiiﬁad; and aﬁtnnutcd to trlcc tbs tttunluc

tinny: Ital-'1cuorlig 1h: Into couplcx toot»:1:url.
patleuﬁn

VOID

and uhuvud

it.) might

11kuly

ltttlu

ﬁuah

it rcupaud quickly and tawlzclvuxr.

o-annvu about making an arrow

0":

«tan

apantanoiutly dounont, '1 luau $hst'n unt rich€.'

�W!

.9,

bdiuuon
$|o d.:run
ruln‘ionnhip
fit:
Ot'ﬁi’ibrll‘ﬁyiflllﬁtlt and $ha aggro. u! parnuptual :Itcrn31ln
taut.
unbuddui
PI‘tcutt
eh.
nunpurod
on
figiruu
an
h: crrurn
‘utth aubcolvnlsxvu uttlslntton-Iika shunt aurora an rotuattua.
A ultghs dgcrauss or unwahanul tn Ottawa octurrnd in that.
who
riogtvzaz
ahnitd
cuntulitvo
ally'haallnl
thirty:
pattlatt
thing‘s.
in. aunvulsivu pittcatl, houivor, ut‘t
pkg-Intogtcul

atudr‘luunlatrlitu

-

&amp;

68. unit anvkud phamaglcgtcux altsruttnn, Ihnvtd a ctxuttlnnat
tn¢r0330 1n number at strewn. 1‘4: lntorrnlntaoauhAp at bruit
£una££un aha porcupiiuu or caboddcd tsguvuu is in actard wi‘t
atudtnn of pu$tnutu with altarud tibia rua¢ttiu an. to htad

wutaatoia
u
(10)
uppaytng
fwuﬁtr
tad
taunt.
taint:
ul-ilur inuhuta 1n QISI&amp; with pauotrattng brain unuadt, tutu
alldud that ycrrurllnan Inn_uarnln&amp;ua to lien. or lonlua
but ihat uphuuic pntttnto and. nixaittcnntly'unru arvnra thtu
&amp; unaunphnnlc bruinwtnjirol group.
Pollack g§_g§, (9). 1113‘
ruporﬁod
Qltc
SI
an
taxation-t1,
an
taut
atuty.
tauntttul
tit
httuuul attain and ‘h. laaation a: 10010: &amp;n tutor patsoutt.
ﬁts
rnlutol
author
at
that
rwporﬁad.
tuntnnd,
in:
Irrort
it!)
to it: stvurtty o: amok unut¢1 changes an dzuaritatntiau.
1‘ should be yuanint o‘t «hat the total prc‘roatunnt
than atom. tow I11 pntlcnt- r‘larraa lav upnvulntvo thnruyy
ﬁn
sauna
hy
saunt1¢a1
10.5
n
linou‘
nun».
tat!
ctrurn.
at.
and brain

nxmk

21.5%: (9) an

um: man

tw

pltluu“. an”

‘

use

populations It. auuparublc 3: turn: .1 a£hnr pntnntﬁura
£11or1u1u.~
xvuund
In
$3.
and
lattata
figurt
ceuautiwa.
a: as.

two

�‘16“

iii! oaunct

in rugurﬁud an rntlntttvc o: notnhrtl 43:9inotaou
an an inalnﬁad out$£y tbairna‘od (It. ﬁt. t¢tn11my at hchavtur.
hasn‘t ‘hll beta; :- 3.0Io in tin rolatloatth, your parttvuuaau
tn aunt inthu any be due to it: internation a: Ina: tn:$«rn.
mu 117thth um. an); an. my “on m
nu.»watt nation cnrnbrcl din... uh» lit! fi'tf hit!!! an $ht- iatk
than ocntrul llhltt‘l viﬁh tn§n¢t turtbrnl tunataun. In in.
prbouaﬁ otudy It. rtugc at altturoacou lull: $hn pattunﬁ: prior
‘0 ‘lﬂﬂildli nun cruator than thnﬁ uhintlud cvua‘ux‘h atrium:
phyasalartall chlacu. “’11. patlaut in thy nahnoavnlatva
group wish I high author at prutvtnilaut «trorn at: ants a
yrlattcn attics In ritcnttn; watt a ruita£1on in crrtra, hit
nbnulutc arrow near: :nr still bu hixhnr tits shut it n puiinnﬁ
ronutvilu tournlntvn ‘hnaunr_uh¢ had Irv protv*ainnnt erurn
0“ I:s alum: auurtaacd dattxaulsy with trociunnt. than.
obnnrvatioan tuccuuﬁ thtt isttanulty 1| ptrtotvtnc cnhaadad
(tutti. ta tainted to acrintu ’Oviiilltiw unpocti tn v.11 n:
it ﬁrst. ttwthnstailu Galituﬁalt with talc aanulptiou. ﬂttita
(1!, 13) but thiod tha‘ ﬁt. Hurlid thtividi&amp;1 dillnrwunua in
tin porttptaoa-c: haddnu tautrla nuns; 0011.10 otudoatn If.
rtlnﬁci to purnounIAtr tun$oro.
its rvlatlllnhip or parucpintl altnruticn to bohavtornl
1.:
clearly
during
u: u group an
than
haunt
,puiauntc at. thalud Qt. cystitis snaruutu in autumn during
trouﬁuant viii than. vi. .130 lhlﬂtl tun swat yruaouncod ah$a¢u

m

t

manna.

�«11¢

mucmd mm puma:

cult“: team”.
may“. Wt... “mum. «aunt-ta a
a:
to
“we“
m
mum m“ m mutt"
on a» mom: tutu an mm tun-Int. ham to
may

1n

or

mu.

pm»

«at»
«um
tut
m
um‘
WW
1»
in
Inﬁnity
um
"mum
u
t
pm.“
at
«ml
mu,
“ton.

A

or raw-

to an

um

In!

of

mm

in

wanna: "mm at non-um

claim ”its!“ c: mm“
1:.
mun“ :- «W. m «$81th

with

«d

mu.
than”

m.

tho

”that“!
to
arr
an.»
«aim
an
n
m
mi:
num.
a.
a
0:
0: m uuutm 1: tutu mum. am... a
can
N
on
mum.“
u Mutt“
an omit: ﬂﬂmm tut
with
or
a
m ammt.
u it. ”won “and“:
u

W

mmum

to 0
in

in

rim

.

am
nun“
:0:m 3m1¢1u1031 mum. in “an.“ manual» m
In
at
no“
c:
a «an “null". that». WI1:
mm an
3m
um
I
m
mm“
cm“
«mitnm
a
Manna.”
ﬂu

at ﬂu

t ”can.” «alum

for

at Ma pron-«mat

mum M3.

mulch. mm
man»- that m
in

a» mum! wanna».- mover.
at
of
a
dam.
mun-«u:
“an
a
4mm“ ma
M
at
much
"nut
”nanny.
u
m an
(a, 5).

to

”an":

�all;

taxman. manna ”than ”1‘qu hr
in
mm.
m an: What
“tummy an um;
A:
4“
ms: an“: man «ma mm. that...
0:
gm,
a
0:
I!
united
min-um
”an“
mu mi
1.

m

mm:
i
It“
mum:
Man...n-mu‘m with ”nun-a
My
nun” ”ulna «hum. m

In:
a: It

pmmutm my.
I. a. madman
“110'“; What

M

'

'

in»:
an
an
“Mina:
m

“I!

«am...

ram as manual no» mu m tﬂlﬂﬂ'ﬂth
in»
tun-nu
"nanny.
mm an imminent” mum u
‘

'

'

3.

mumuotnwmmunmumnmnu
“but!“ “use.

p

um um: mo autumn:
of
bran
alum
m
«gm
tutu“ amino!
mm u
In

run-«hunt

W
Mm at ”nanny («my
tmhmt.

I'M

1.th
mint“.

“ﬂute!!!“ at “It!
in

.1
psi-«pm
W10:
mu“:
“than
chum: «1mm».
no puns-u or human:
5.

m

M

am

�mm:

M.

1|"le

11133th a: hut (ulna. m
1.:
In.“
ma:
man
ﬂu
u mutt as also.“
m1.
"by
9.:
Wk
mug-ma um m an.“
u 3. n g m
an: m tn um» Hm. «I: u “I“ an
at“
m was “we.

W

m

�«1 3a

References

I. Inttarahy, w.s.. traccnr. x.r., reliant,

n. and nundlr.
3.3.: figuruogrcmnd ¢£unr£uannt1nu and the abatrtut
uttitncn 1n putatuta with narchrax neayltnna. 5,555,
‘4 xi,
'_'_, gaig.~;k;w., 19; 369, 195$.
2. rink. I. and Kuhn, Into: leln‘ttn Qt ita ﬁcltl anivtty
‘a behavioral raapouao an electrouhaaks quantitnﬁivn
'

sorts: utiliaa,

ewe

.'o 1!?

a

516. 1951.

J. rink.

h.

m.

I.t.

tucturc
vayuhnlnnzaal
l.u
rlmllsh,
l..
Ittecttng individual attrcrlacus In hohtvanrtl filviiii
Kata.

and

a. «man mm. mg... m: m. 1939.
m. rm, M... and arm. ma... Mora-um mm.

'

0! the alaotveuhaek prune... Egg, leggg 51p., l2! 1.
1958.

5. mm. 2.3... rm, 1:. mt manna, 1m... lemma .3
Innhtrbttaa tout to altﬁiﬁll inprrvoann‘ in cleatrclhatk,
1.mt.,‘1§I 83. 1956.
6. Kuhn, 3.3.. Pollnel, ﬂ. and tint, n.a auutul flatari 1n ‘ho
taxonﬁauu at thtvlwy ta 3 valuntear ninth: hanpttal.
,.

7.

.ﬁ

_.

,

uI.

go :16”. 1997.

Iain, I.L., Pulltnk,

and

risk, 3.: atatapuylhaluuto

ﬁrtntlnut an I reinstary ninth!
haspt‘tl. 5.x.n. trot. ﬂan. Payer. (In preto).
I. tenets, 6.. 3111‘», a. and beeper; 8.! damage: 3: little:lliinn thrtlhﬁld and in until. vtnnﬁtlu $1.! Indtotd
1956.
by
61.
that-pr.
a:
magenta ‘3 paguhtttrso

“wanna“

W...

�...L 1.1.23.1...LL

hunt.

I...

ground

tuna”.

10.

rum, Id.

I).

8.3.:

W

and

'nnna

W
M.
‘

5.:
woman.
attu-

{W

“any
hunt,
mm
1;.»- m. 1m.
to

hunch, 3a.. uh.

IJ...‘ Guam.

ammo m a
a man“ in“ than.
1953.

1!.

mm.

Wumm
M,
1‘va
mu“
mm:

11.

ma. m4

itltrﬁntnlttui in pttllut: itth carthvll
at
Panama“). Amati“.

m. m

1957.

‘

mm.

3.4.1.

“It.

in:

m:

889.

on

«an (Inn: want)

’

.

«mm».

8.5.:

.1 unhaido‘ tiguruu, g, rugg..

in

£23

«u

a!

1, 1936.

swam mm»:
um Wu 3.9M.
um.
1M.
pot-«yam.
a
a:
W"
LA...

um

.1

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2784">
                <text>Figure-ground discrimination after induced altered brain function. Arch Neurol. (Chic.) 1960 May; 2:547-51</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2785">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2786">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-47-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2787">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2788">
                <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2789">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2790">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2791">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprinted from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology May 1960, Vol. 2, pp. 547—551</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2792">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2793">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74481">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81042">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87603">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94164">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="280" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="71">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/fdd65cffa7365ba9ca6ade8a0f3f6e8b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>60ce7c5bb093bf1402d25c650f359a34</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100697">
                    <text>PROCNOSTIC VALUE OF RORSCHACH CRITERIA IN CLINICAL
RESPONSE TO CONVULSIVE THERAPY
ROBERT

L. KAHN, PH.D., and MAX FINK, MD.
ABSTRACT

In this study of the relationship between premorbid personality factors
and clinical responses to convulsive therapy, the Rorschach test was admin—
istered to 87 unselected patients prior to the beginning of EC T. A favorable
clinical response to ECT was observed in subjects whose Rorschach records
revealed a basically conventional and unimaginative personality, generally
lacking in empathy, introspectiveness or facility of verbal communication.
Post-treatment records (of 41 patients) showed no signiﬁcant changes. It is
therefore concluded that Rorschach patterns reﬂect basic personality rather
than prevailing mood or type of illness. These results indicate that Rorschach
patterns can be useful adjuncts in the selection of patients for convulsive
therapy.

In a series of studies of convulsive therapy
we have observed marked individual differences in behavioral response. It has been
shown that the induction of a behavioral
change is related to the presence of altered
brain function;5 Yet, among those with
equivalent degrees of physiologic change,
there are still differences in the clinical patterns of behavior. While some patients become hypomanic, others show paranoid reactions, withdrawal, increased somatization or

expressions of fear.3
We have postulated that personality is one
of the signiﬁcant factors affecting this variability. This hypothesis was tested in a previous study,6 in which each patient’s premorbid personality was evaluated by means of
structured interviews with members of his
family and with the patient himself. We

found that the patients who were rated as
recovered or much improved after electroshock treatment were those with the follow-

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., New York.
'This study was supported in part by Research
Grant M—927 from the National Institute of Mental
Health, US. Public Health Service.
Presented at meeting of the Electroshock Research
Association, San Francisco, May 11, 1958.

ing personality pattern: they were generally
nonempathic, nonintrospective, verbally noncommunicative, highly conventional and
stereotyped, with little imagination or creative capacity.
The concepts derived from these observations lend themselves to study by other methods. In the present study the Rorschach test,
another measure of personality, was used. The
Rorschach technique has particular advantages in that it is both an instrument for testing the patient directly and, at the same time,
a standardized procedure providing data
which can be veriﬁed by others.
The speciﬁc purpose of the present study
was to determine: (1) the relationship between Rorschach ﬁndings and personality aspects previOusly fOund to be signiﬁcant in
family interviews; and (2) the applicability
of Rorschach criteria in the prognosis of the
clinical response to convulsive therapy.
METHOD

The population consisted of 87 consecutive,
unselected patients referred for convulsive
therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. All
patients received electroconvulsive therapy
(with either unidirectional or alternating-current instruments) three times a week. A mini242

Reprinted from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No. 5, May—June, 1960

�l

960

mum Of 12 treatments was given, with the
staff psychiatrist in charge of the treatment
determining the ﬁnal number on the basis of
clinical criteria. The improvement evaluation,
made by the staff psychiatrist, was based on
the patient’s behavior in the hospital setting
during the period of two to four weeks following termination of treatment. In this manner each patient was rated as either much improved, moderately improved Or unimproved.
As previously described,5 patients were
rated “much improved” if they no longer
showed the symptoms which had brought
them into the hospital; if, in addition, their
doctors felt they were better; and if the
nurses’ notes conﬁrmed such aspects as ability
to sleep without medication, better appetite,
and improved capacity to get along with other
patients and participate in hospital activities.

“Moderately improved” patients typically
showed some symptomatic relief (i.e., acute
depressive features might be gone), but not
the dramatic changes so evident in the ﬁrst
group. Each of these patients continued to
show some noticeable disturbance such as
obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas or somatic preoccupation. In the “unimproved”
patients, change was either not clearly noticeable or only equivocal or transient. Some
showed ﬂuctuations in behavior, at times appearing somewhat improved; but the change
was not sustained, so that by the end of treatment they appeared much the same as before.
The Rorschach test was given to each patient prior to the beginning of electroconvulsive therapy and, in 41 cases, two weeks
after electroconvulsive therapy. The Ror—
schach records were scored according to the
criteria of Klopfer and Kelley.9 Only those
common components were studied, however,
which could be analyzed quantitatively.
These included:
Total number of responses.
2. Per cent whole responses (responses in
which a subject uses all of a card for the formation of a concept).
3. Per cent form responses (responses in
which the shape of the blot is the sole determinant in the concept formation).
1.

243

JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

Number of content categories included
in the responses.
5. Number of movement responses (references to any action or movement).
6. Per cent popular responses (responses
statistically given most frequently to a particular blot area).
7. Presence or absence of shading responses (responses in which a subject incorporates the darker and lighter aspects of a
blot into his description).
8. Type of movement responses (e.g., human movement, animal movement, etc.).
9. Type of color responses (responses in
which the color in a blot plays a recognizable
role in the concept formation; when form and
color are both signiﬁcant, color-form [CF] or
form-color [FC] is scored, depending on the
predominant inﬂuence).
4.

RESULTS

The relation of the various Rorschach factors to clinical changes following ECT is
shown in Tables I-IV.
In Table I, comparison is made between
those patients who were rated as having a
good clinical response and those whose response was moderate or poor. The much improved patients had signiﬁcantly fewer total
number of responses, and signiﬁcantly more
per cent whole and form responses.
TABLE I
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS TO CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(NUMBER, PER CENT WHOLE, PER CENT FORM
RESPONSES)

Number of Responses
Much Improved (38)

Mean

S.D.

13.0

6.7

Moderate or
Unimproved
(48) 19.5 12.8
Per Cent Whole Responses
Much Improved (38) 87.6 21.0

Moderate or
Unimproved
(48)
Per Cent Form Responses
Much Improved (38)
Moderate or
Unimproved

(48)

Signiﬁcant at .05 level
** Signiﬁcant at .01 level
*

24.4

18.2

71.8

19.0

61.9

21.4

Diff.

t,

6.5

2.7 *"

13.

3.0 H

9.9

2.2

*

�244

JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

An analysis of content categories, move-

ment responses and popular responses (presented in Table II) reveals that there were
signiﬁcantly fewer content categories and
movement responses, and a greater per cent
of popular responses in the Rorschach records
of the much improved patients, as compared
with the records of the unimproved and mod—
erately improved groups.
As shown in Table III, the much improved
patients were also less likely to have any kind
of shading response. This table also presents
an analysis of the different types Of movement
and color responses. Those patients who gave
human~movement (M) responses had the
TABLE II
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS To CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(CONTENT CATEGORIES, MOVEMENT AND PER CENT
POPULAR RESPONSES)
t.
Mean
Diff.
SD.

Number of Content Categories
Much Improved (38)
3.8
Moderate or
Unimproved
4.9
(48)
Number of Movement Responses
Much Improved (38)
2.3
Moderate or
Unimproved
4.9
(48)
Per Cent Popular Responses
Much Improved (38) 37.7
Moderate or
Unimproved

(48)

26.6

2.2

2.7
5.1

21.6

poorest clinical responses (28% much improved), while those with no movement of
any kind had the best clinical results (63%
much improved). Patients with animal-movement (FM) or inanimate-movement (In) responses were rated better than those with
human movement but not as well as those
with no movement at all. With respect to
color, those patients with form-color (FC) responses had the poorest results; those with no
color at all, the best—although patients with
CF or C responses did almost as well.
In Table IV the patients are grouped according to combinations of human-movement
(M) and form-color (FC) responses. Of
those who had both M and FC, only 17% were
rated as much improved; 25% were considered
unimproved. In contrast, of those with neither
M nor FC, 66% were much improved and only
3% were unimproved. The
ratings of the group
with one or the other of these determinants
(M or F C) fell in between.
As

2.3

11.1

2.8

14.3

*

Signiﬁcant at .05 level
"* Signiﬁcant at .01 level

MAY-JUNE

mentioned, post-treatment records

were obtained from 41 patients. Comparison
of the pre—treatment and post-treatment records of these patients revealed little change
in the types of responses found. With respect
to human movement (M), for example, 34 of
the records showed no change. In four cases
patients with M responses prior to treatment
H showed none afterward; three other patients
with no M response had such response following treatment. These small changes could be
expected on a chance basis.

TABLE III
RELATION OF RORSCHACH FACTORS TO CLINICAL RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(SHADING, MOVEMENT AND COLOR)
Total No.
Much Improved
Moderately Improved
Un improved
Shading
46
15 (33%)
20 (43%)
11
(24%)
No Shading
40
23 (58%)
15 (38%)
2 ( 5%)

x2

= 8.12

p&lt;.02

Human Movement (M)
Animal Movement (FM)
and/or Inanimate
Movement (In)

39

11

(28%)

19

(49%)

9

(23%)

29

16

(55%)

9

(31%)

4

No Movement

(14%)

19

12

(63%)

FOrm-Color (FC)

7

(37%)

X2

=

10.49

p&lt;.05

Color-Form (CF)
and/or Pure
Color (C)

34

7

(21%)

18

(53%)

9

(26%)

27

16

(59%)

8

(30%)

3

No Color

(11%)

26

16

(62%)

.

(35%)

1

(

.

_

&gt;

x2

= 14.98

p&lt;.01

4%)

�JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

I960
TABLE IV

RELATION 0F RORSCHACH FACTORS To CLINICAL
RESPONSE IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY
(HUMAN MOVEMENT AND FORM-COLOR)
Much
Total
Moderately
Human

Improved Unimproved

Movement
(M) and
Form-Color

No.

Improved

(FC)

24
25

4 (17%)
10 (40%)

14 (58%)
9 (36%)

6 (25%)
6 (20%)

38

25 (66%)

12 (32%)

1

FC
Neither M
nor FC

M or

M

and FC vs. M or FC vs. Neither M nor F0:

M

and

X2

WC

vs. Neither M nor FR:

.‘(1’

=

-:

17.82
12.26

(

3%)

p&lt;.01
p&lt;.00]

EPICBISIS

The results of this study conﬁrm the findings previously reported concerning the relationship of personality to clinical response
after convulsive therapy. Patients who had a
good clinical result showed Rorschach records
characterized by few responses and little variety of content, no shading or movement or
color responses, and a high percentage of
whole, form and popular responses. This kind
of record indicates a personality pattern
which is nonempathic, nonintrospective, verbally noncommunicative, highly conventiOnal
and stereotyped and with little manifestation
of imagination or creative capacity. These
characteristics are identical with those described in the previous study based on interviews with family members.6
The prognostic value of the Rorschach as a
clinical instrument is demonstrated by these
data. While there are a number of studies in
the literature on the prognostic value of the
Rorschach in somatic therapy, the results have
not been consistent. Rabin,13 for example,
states that “single Rorschach factors cannot
serve . . . as predictors of improvement.” On
the other hand, Piotrowski12 describes specific prognostic criteria. It is likely that the
difference in point of view, as well as in the
varying criteria offered, reﬂects differences in
the type of population and the variety of somatic treatment observed. Despite these problems, however, those studies 12’ 14 with the
largest series of patients have obtained results
similar to those of the present study. For ex—
ample, their data show that the absence of

245

human movement (M) is more often associated with a favorable clinical response, and
that patients with form-color (FC) responses
are more likely to have a poor result.14
The signiﬁcance of our findings might be
questioned on the basis that we have demonstrated a relationship merely between clinical
response and type of illness, rather than between clinical response and personality pattern. This objection would appear to be sup1“
4’10'1‘1
the
studies
ported by
numerous
which have reported that depressed patients.
the most likely candidates for convulsive
therapy, show no human-movement or color
responses. Our observations, however, substantiated by other studies,1’7!8’“’ Show a
constancy of the Rorschach before and after
treatment, and indicate that the response pattern reﬂects aspects of the basic personality
rather than transient features such as the prevailing mood or type of illness.
REFERENCES

l. Beck,

S. J.: Arch. Neurol. &amp;

1943.
2. Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.:

3.
4.
5.

6.

7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.

Psychiat. 50:483.

AMA. Arch. Neurol.

i7 Psychiat, 78:516-525, 1957.
Fink, M., and Kahn, R. L.: paper presented at
meeting of A.P.A., New York, 1957.
Cuirdham, A.: Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 16:130—
145, 1936.
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A.:
AMA. Arch. Neurol. b Psychiat, 76:23—29.
1956.
Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: I. Neurop.sychiat., 1:
45-50, 1959.
Kelley, D. M., Margolis, H., and Barbera, S. E.:
Rorsch. Res. Exch., 5:35-43, 1941.
Kisker, C. W.: I. Aim. (J Soc. Psychol., 37:120—
124, 1942.
Klopfer, B., and Kelley, D.: The Rorschach
Technique, World Book Co., New York, 1942.
Levy, D. M., and Beck, S. J.: Am. J. Orthopsy—
chiat., 4:31—42, 1934.
Pacella, B. L., Piotrowski, Z., and Lewis, N. I).
G: Am. J. Psychiat., 104:83-91, 1947.
Piotrowski, Z.: Psychiat. Quart, 14:267-273.
1940; 15:807—822, 1941.
Rabin, A. 1.: Am. Psychol., 2:284, 1947.
Rees, W. L., and Jones, A. M.: J. Ment. Sc., 97:
681-689, 1951.

H.: Psychodiagnostics, Crune &amp;
Stratton, New York, 1942.
16. Varvel, W. A.: Bull. Menninger Clin., 5:5-12,

15. Rorschach,

1941.

�Pragmatic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Clinical
Beeponse

to Convulsive 'Iherapy

Robert L. Kahn Ph.D. and

From

Max

Fink M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

L.I., NJ.
Aided, in part,

by grant

Public Health Service.

M

927, National

Institute of

Mental Health, U.S.

Presented at the Electroshock Research Association, San Francisco,
May 11, 1958.
5-5-58

�Prognostic Value of Rorschach Criteria in Glynical
Response
RObert L.

to Convulsive Therapy

W

Phone and Max Fink

In a series of studies of convulsive therapy

MOD.

we have

observed marked

individual differences in behavioral response. It has been shown that the
induction of a behavioral change is related to the presence of altered
brain function (2, 5). Yet, among those with equivalent degrees of
physiologic change, there are

still

differences in the clinical patterns

of behavior. While some patients became hypcmanic, others show paranoid

reactions, withdrawal, increased somatization or expressions of fear (3).
we have

postulated that personality is one of the significant factors

affecting this variability. This hypothesis has been tested in a previous
study using structured interviews with members of the patient's family (6).

It

was

reported that patients

who were

rated as recovered or

much improved

following treatment were generally non-empathic, non-introspective, non-

verbally communicative, highly conventional and stereotyped, with
imagination or creative capacity.
The concepts

derived from these observations lend themselves to study

by other methods.

used

little

in this study.

The Rorschach

test, another

The Rorschach

measure of

personality,

technique had the advantages both of

testing the patient directly and of being a standardized procedure
providing data which could be verified by otherS.
The

specific purpose of the present study

was

to determine:

1) the relationship between Rorschach findings and personality

aspects previously found to be significant in family

interviews, and

was

�.2.2) the application of Rorschach

criteria in the prognosis of

the clinical response to convulsive therapy.
METHOD:

The

population consisted of 86 consecutive, unselected patients

referred for convulsive therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. All patients
received electrocommlsive therapy three times a week, using either

midirectional or alternating current instruments.

A

minimmn

of 12

treatments was given, with the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the

treatment determining the final number

on the

The improvement exraluation was made by

basis of clinical criteria.

the supervising psychiatrist

the patient's behavior in the hospital setting in a period
to four weeks following the termination of treatment. In this

and was based on

of two

patient

manner each

was

rated as either

much improved,

moderately improved

criteria previously described (5).
Each patient was given the Rorschach test in the standard mnner in
the week prior to treatment. This data constituted the main focus of this

or unimproved, using

study.

To

determine

however, the

of treatment.

test

was

stability

of the Rorschach pattern with treatment,

readministered two weeks following the termination

�RESULTS :

A.

Relatim of Rorschach Factors to Clinical
The Rorschach

records were scored according to the criteria

of Klopfer and Kelley (9). (July these
however, which could be analyzed

total

Change:

common components were

studied,

quantitatively. These included

of responses, 2) per cent whole reSponses, 3) Per
cent form responses, )4) number of content categories included in the

1)

number

responseS,

5) number of movement responses,

6) per cent popular

responses, 7) presence or absence of shading responses,
movement reaponses, and

8) type of

9) type of color responses.

In Table I the comparison is

made between

those patients

who were

clinical response and those whose reSponse was
moderate or poor. The much improved patients had significantly fewer
number of responses, and significantly more per cent whole and form
rated as having a

responses .

good

�TABLE

I

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical Response in Convulaive Therapy:
Number, Per Cent Whole, Per Cent Form Responses

Number

Mean

§_:_D_o

(38)

13.0

6.7

(h8)

19.5

12.8

of Resmnses

Much Improved

Moderate or
UnimProved

Diff.
6.5

L
2.7

*‘hL

Per Cent Whole Resmnse
Much Improved

(38)

37.6

21.0

Moderate or
Unimproved

(ha)

2h.h

18.2

(38)

71.8

19.0

(ha)

61.9

21 .h

13 .2

3.00

*4:"

Per Cent Form Resoonse
Much

anrorved

Moderate or
Unmproved

9.9

2.2 *

as

Significant at .05 level

*"‘

Significant at .01 level

�-5significantly fewer content categories in the Rorschach
records in the much improved patients. (TableJI). They also demonstrated
There were

fewer movement and a greater per cent of popular responses, than the
unimproved and moderately improved groups.

TABIEII

of
have
kind
to
less
any
likely
patients
shading responses, as shown in Table III. In this table the comparison is
also shown for the different types of movement and. color responses. Those
patients who had human movement responses (M) had the poorest clinical
were also

The much improved

had the best

results

inanimate movement
movement

improved), while those with no movement of any kind

(28% much

reaponses

(63% much

(m)

improved). Patients with animal

(FM)

or

reaponses were rated better than those with human

but not as well as those without any movement at

all.

With

respect to color, those patients with form color (F0) reaponses had the
poorest results, “those with no color at all the best, although patients
with

CF

or

C

responses did almost as well.
TABLE

III

�.6.
TABLEII

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Ciinical Response in Convulsive ’Iherapy:
Content Categories, Movement and Per Cent Poplgar Responses

Number

$.13.

(38)

3.8

2.2

(he)

h.9

2.3

Diff.

of Content Categories

Much Improved
Mod

Mean

erate or

Unimproved

iﬂ,

1.1

2.1

2.6

**
2.7

11.1

*

Number of Moveme‘ot Responses
Much Improved

(38)

2.3

2.7

Moderate or
Unimproved

(hi3)

h.9

5.1

(38)

37.7

21.6

(h8)

26.6

1h.3

Per Cent Pomar Responses
Much Improved

Moderate, or
Unimproved

* Significant
**

2.8

V.

at .05 level

Signiﬁcant at .01 level

�$3

g

3

35
N

8.V.

$8

335

m

a

m

$8

o
menu;H

m

Amaav

305

m

H

SVQ

”ummnony

wmbommﬁH

NH.w

32

n

n

0

«N

«x

NM

QQOJH

mmeazpaoo

gs
ca
Nampwhmcos

$5

€09

“Rm:

N.

3

a

m

Ammmv

Ammov

Amawv

Ammmv

HH

ma

NH

N

0H

RS

Amwv

8d

Amos

ﬁg:

“many

3.5

ma

3

m

383

Rammv

,mH

mu

$5

85

8

noaoo
omcbmmmm

HHH

cam
[chlmnm¢ﬂ
Hmowawao

unmsmboz

on

\xﬁmmmV
cabommgH

Awmev

myopowm

ﬁnﬁm

sou:

ma

nomnomnom

mo

mbwpmamm

I!

RE

AEhv

Aumv

upmaﬁuu¢m

pumsmboz

Amuv

ASV
chum

303%:

on

such
pamembnx

gamma
pmoswboz

wﬁuﬂm

02

g

noaoo

hoaoo_suom

n0\unm

noxnnm
amewq&lt;

noaoo

hoaoo

oz

oz

�-8In Table IV the patients were grouped according to combinations
of

H

and

rated as

FC

responses.

01‘

those

who had both

much improved and 25% were

of those with neither

M

nor

M

and

PC

only

1775

were

considered mimproved. In contrast,

EC, 66% were much improved and

only

3%

were

improved. The ratings of the group with one or the other of these

deteminants

fell in

between.

unnuumm
TABLES

IV

W...‘.
B. chnErison of Pre- and Posttreatment Records

Posttreatment records were obtained from hl patients. These
showed

little

difference from the types of responses found prior to

treatment. .fith respect to

human movement (M),

for example,

recorﬂs shared no change. In four cases patients with
none afterwards;
follow-ring

three other patients with no

treatment.

M

M

3h of the

responses showed

response had such response

�«a.
TABLE IV

Relation of Rorschach Factors to Clinical Response in Convulsive Therapy:
Human Movement SM) and Form

Color

$130)

Rorschach
___N__

M

and

M

or

FC

F0

Neither

M

M

nor

FC

and FC/Neither Mmr

Much Improved

(21:)

h

(25)

10

(ho%)

(38)

25

(6655

FC

(17%)

Moderateg ImEroved

W
6

(25%)

(36%)

6

(20%)

(32%)

1

(3%)

1h

(58%)

9
12

x2

=

x2

- 12.26

17.82

p

&lt;

p.&lt;;

.01
.001

�.10..
DISCUSSION:

this study confirm the ﬁndings previously reported
concerning the relationship of personality to clinical response after
convulsive therapy. Patients who had a good clinical result showed
The

results

of

Rorschach records characterized by few responses and

content, no shading or

movement or

little variety

of

color reaponse, and a high percentage

of whole, form and popular reSponses.

This pattern indicates a personality

pattern which i s non-empathic, non-introspective, non-verbally cormunicative,
highly conventional and stereotyped and with little manifestation of
imagination or creative capacity. These aspects are identical with these
described in the previous study based on interviews with family members (6).
The

prognostic value of the Rorschach as a clinical instrument is

demonstrated by

this data. ifhile there are a

number

of studies in the

literature on the prognostic value of the Rorschach in somatic therapy,
the results have not been consistent. T:Jhile Rabin (3), for example, has
stated that "single Rorschach factors cannot serve ... as predictors of
improvement ," Piotrowski has described specific prognostic criteria (12).
It is likely that the difference in point of view, as well as in the
varying criteria offered, reflects differences in the type of population
and the varieties of somatic treatment observed. Despite these problerns,
however, the results of those studies with the largest series of patients
report similar observations to those in the present study. For
example, their data shows that the absence of human movement (M) is more
(12,

114)

often associated with a favorable clinical response, and that patients

�.uwith

F0

responses are more likely to have a poor result (1h).

The

that

significance of these results might

be

questioned on the basis

clinical response and
type of illness rather than ﬂue personality pattern. In this regard
numerous studies have reported that depressed patients, the most likely
candidates for convulsive therapy, show no human movement or color
we

have demonstrated a

reSponses (h, 10, 15, 16).
by other

relationship

Our

studies (1, 7, 8, 11),

after treatment,

between

observations, however, substantiated
show a constancy

of the Rorschach before

indicate that the reSponse pattern reflects
aspects of the basic personality rather than transient features as the

and

prevailing

mood

and

or type of illness.

�SUMMARY.AND CONCLUSION:

1. Eighty-seven unselected cases referred for convulsive therapy
were administered a Rorschach

test prior to,

and two weeks following,

treatment.

2.

A

favorable clinical response was observed in subjects with

pretreatment records characterized by few responses, a small number of
content categories, absence of shading, movement and color responses

(particularly lack of

human movement and form

color), and a high percentage

of whole, form and popular reSponses.
This data confirms previous observations on the

3.

personality factors to clinical

outcome

relation of

in convulsive ﬂierapy.

favorable evaluation is most likely in patients

who

A

are predominantly

non-empathic, non-introSpective, nonaverbally communicative, highly

conventional and stereotyped, with

little

imagination or creative capacity.

significant

change

in Rorschach records obtained

There was no

A.

It is

that pretreatment Rorschach patterns
in this population reflect the basic personality rather than the prevailing

following treatment.
mood

concluded

or type of illness.
5.

can be

patterns, by providing a set of prognostic criteria,
useful adjuncts in the selection of patients for convulsive

therapy.

Rorschach

�.13-

2.‘

Fink,

3.

and Katm, R.L.: Relation of
Electroencephalographic Delta
Activity to Behavioral Response in Ele ctroshoclc, A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. 8: P_s,zchiat., IQ: 516-525 (1957).

A

M.

Behavioral Patterns with Induced States of
tered Brain Function, Div. Meeting A.P.A. (New York 1957).
:

14.

Guirdham, A.: Diagnosis of Depression by
Med. Psycho . _1_§: 130-115 (1936).

5.

Kahn,

the Rorschach Test, Brit. J.

R.L., Fink, M. and Weinstein, E.A.: Relation of Amobarbital
Test to Clinical Bnprovement in Electroshock, A.M.A.
Arch.
Neurol.
and Psychiat. 1g: 23-29 (1956).

,: Personality

7.
8.

9.
10.
11.
12.

Factors in Behavioral Reaponse to
Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neural. (in press)
Kelley, D.M., Margolis, H. and Barbara, S.E.:
of
the
Stability
Rorschach Method as Demonstrated in Electric Comrulsive
Therapy
Cases, Rorsch. Res. Exch., 5: 35-143 (19M).
Kisker, G.W.: A Projective Approach to Personality Patterns
During
Insulin-Shock and Metrazol-Convulsive Therapy, J. Abn. &amp;
Soc.
21: 120“12)4 (19112).

mo:

Klopfer, B. and Kelley, D.: The Rorschach Technigue. (World Book
Co. , New York 19h2).

levy,

D.M. and Beck

Psychosis,

Am.

S.J.:

Rorschach Test in Manic-Depressive
J. Orthops‘gchiat” ll: 314:2 (19311).
The

Pacella, B.L., Piotrowski, Z. and Lewis, N.D.C.: The Effects of
Electric Convulsive Therapy on Certain Personality Traits
in
Psychiatric Patients, Am. J. Psvchiat. 1011: 83—91 (19M).

Piotrwski, Z.:

A

Simple Experimental Device

for the Prediction

Quart., lg: 267-273 (1910);
Aid in the Insulin Shock Treatment of
Schizophrenia,
Psychiat.
Quart. 15: 807—822 (19141).

�REFERENCES

13. Rabin, A.I: Effects of Electric Shock Treatment upon Some Aspects
of Personality and Intellect, Am. PsEhol. g: 281; (1911?).

lb.

Rees, W.L. and Jenes, A.M.: An Evaluation of the Rorschach Test as
a Prognostic Aid in the Treatment of Schizophrenia by Insulin
Coma Therapy, Electronarcosis, Electroconvulsive Therapy and
Leucotomy, J. Ment. Sci. 97: 681-689 (1951).

15. Rorschach, H.: Psydhodiagnostics (Grune

Stratton,

The Rorschach Test in Psychotic and
Manninger 01111., S: 5'12 (19,41)-

16. Varvel, MtA.:

Bull.

&amp;

New

York, 19h2).

Neurotic Depressions,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2794">
                <text>Prognostic value of Rorschach criteria in clinical response to convulsive therapy. J Neuropsychiatr. 1960 May-Jun; 1:242-5.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2795">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2796">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-48-014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2797">
                <text>1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2798">
                <text>Kahn, Robert; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2799">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2800">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2801">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. I, No. 5, May—June, 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2802">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2803">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74482">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81043">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87604">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94165">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="246" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="37">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/83ffbada2aade577e8a98ad3651523e9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>fc1b31ed52223d2b16d46a30284791a4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100663">
                    <text>Borderland of Neurology —

BASEL (Schweiz)

Conﬁnia Neurologica
Grenzgebiete der Neurologie - Les Conﬁus de la Neurologie
Editor: E. A. SPIEGEL
S.

KARGER

NEW YORK

Separatum Vol. 16, No. 2/3 (1956)
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Electroshock Research Association
Atlantic City, New Jersey, May 8, 1955
Karin, H., M. Fink and S. Kwalwasser: Conﬁn. neurol. 16, 88, 1956

Printed in Switzerland

From the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York

Relation of Changes in Memory and Learning to
Improvement in Electroshock 1'
**
Max
FINK
*,
KORIN
By Hyman
and Simon KWALWASSER ***

Read by title. This investigation was supported in part by a research grant
M-927 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Public Health Service.
Received the annual $ 100 prize awarded by the Electroshock Research Association.
* Research Assistant (psychology).
** Director of Research.
*** Associate Medical Director.
T

�In the course of studies of the relation between altered brain function and improvement following electroshock therapy, the present
investigation of memory functions was undertaken. By serial testing
of learning and recall variables, an attempt is made ﬁrst to study and
quantify memory changes; and then to determine the relationship
between therapeutic outcome and such changes.
Amnestic effects during electroshock therapy are commonly observed, and are both of practical and theoretical interest. Although

differences in methodology, materials, subjects and electroconvulsive
techniques make direct comparison difﬁcult, a few conclusions related
to the questions of concern in this study can be derived from published

investigations.
The majority of investigators state that no signiﬁcant memory loss
or other intellectual impairment remains two or three weeks after
treatment 1—4. One study 5, however, noted that 5 patients, otherwise
fully recovered, reported defects affecting long familiar names of
6
and
Zubin
places,
found no indication
lasting a year or more.
persons

�Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser

89

that electroshock destroyed memory traces, and concluded that where
memory loss persists, the progress is one of slow recovery rather than

obliteration.
In studies of personal memories selective circumscribed amnesias
at least four and ﬁve weeks after therapy are described for material
elicited in pretreatment interviews 7' 8. The amnesias, however, are
construed as due to subtle emotional factors, rather than permanent
8
memory loss. From such observations, Janis postulates that memory
impairment facilitates repressions and thereby reduces affective
disturbances.
Regarding the question of memory impairment as a prerequisite
for improvement, Wilcox 9 notes that three techniques of electroconvulsive therapy, namely, the “organic shock”, the “standard” or
Cerletti and the “brain-facilitation” techniques, are based on concepts which attribute varying degrees of importance to amnestic
change. Studies based on the “brain-facilitation” technique where
the low current type Reiter and “brief-stimulus” electrostimulators
are used, emphasize the diminished memory change induced as compared to the “standard technique”, although reported therapeutic
results are analogous 1°. Hoch and Kalinowsky 11, believe the “standard” technique to be the most effective therapeutically; and numerous clinicians using the “organic-shock” method hold that a
12.
is
for
of
electroshock
essential
success
therapeutic
regressive type
13
Wilcox
of
In a speciﬁc study
this problem,
recently found no relation between improvement and either the treatment induced confusion seen immediately following an initial Reiter electroshock, or
after a series of ten electroshocks.
Method and Materials
The subjects are 40 consecutive patients referred for electroshock treatment and
21 untreated controls at Hillside Hospital. The clinical diagnosis in the electroshock
patients include involutional depression, 7; manic depressive psychosis, 18; reactive depression, 4; paranoid schizophrenia, 3; catatonic schizophrenia, 5 and
hebephrenic schizophrenia, 3. The depressed patients tend to be older — between
40 and 68 years of age; the schizophrenic patients are younger, between 24 and
40 years. For the untreated group, patients designated as possible electroshock
candidates were selected. They are a representative sample of the electroshock
group matched proportionately with respect to diagnosis, age, education and
previous electroshock treatment.
The Reiter CW 47 C electrostimulator was used in all cases. Treatment was
administered on alternate days 3X per week, and was reduced after the second
week depending on the clinical condition of the patient.
8

Conﬁnia Neurologica, Vol. 16, No. 2/3 (1956)

�90

Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

Methodologically, the study involves a test of the ability of patients to recall an
original learning of lists of eight, three letter common words, at weekly intervals
under two conditions: (a) immediately after an interpolated learning of a list of
nonsense syllables; (b) after a ten minute rest period during which a copy of “Life”
magazine is read.
The choice of testing method and materials was based on studies in retroactive
inhibition which indicate that the degree of retention of a learning task varies with
the type of activity interposed between an original learning and the later measurement of retention. Thus, by interpolating nonsense syllables and the reading of a
magazine on separate test days each week, two indicators of recall function of
varying sensitivity are obtained.
In the test procedure lists of common words and nonsense syllables are arranged
according to established experimental procedures respecting successive consonants
and vowels 14. Each list of words was presented manually on ﬂash cards by the
examiner. The time interval of exposure was not deﬁnite during learning and
seldom exceeded ﬁve seconds. For recall, however, 10 seconds was uniformly

permitted.
In the presentation of the lists for the interpolation condition the common words
were presented for a maximum of ten trials; or less if the list was learned earlier.
The list of nonsense syllables was then similarly presented. In the no-interpolation
condition the learning procedure was similar, except that reading “Life” magazine
was substituted for the nonsense syllables. Each condition was tested weekly on
non-electroshock days, alternating between successive treatments.
The control group was tested in the same way, twice weekly for ﬁve weeks, to
simulate the testing for 12 electroshock treatments. Following completion of
treatment, ratings of improvement were determined independently by the supervising psychiatrist on the basis of observations of ward behavior and psychiatric
interviews. The improved patients were those in whom there was a marked change
in behavior, and whose acute symptoms had subsided. In the moderately improved
The
behavior
but
in
persisted.
transient
there
change
symptoms
a
was
group,
unimproved patients were those in whom symptoms persisted or increased and in
whom there was no change in behavior.

Results
(I) Original and Interpolated Learning.
Impairment in learning function occurred during treatment in the
electroshock group. This was seen in the increased mean number of
failures to learn the words and syllables as the number of treatments
increased (Fig. 1). The decrement in learning is maximal in the 4—6
and 7—9 electroshock periods. In the 10—12 treatment period this
decrement in learning ability decreases. This decrease may be the
result of a change in therapy from three to two treatments weekly
in many of the patients. Considerable recovery in learning function
3—4
administered
when
at
day intervals.
treatments are
occurs

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

9].

RELATION OF ERRORS IN LEARNING
TO ELECTROSHOCK TREATMENT

50

\
/
+/_____
n‘
+

0Z

40

2

E 30
Lu
.1

E
U)

(I
O

ELECTROSHOCK GROUP

0—4-

0—0

LEARNING

0F NONSENSE SYLLABLES

LEARNING OF COMMON WORDS

UNTREATE o GROUP

+

o---+

+

0—--o

LEARNING
LEARNING

or Nonsense

POST

POST
TREATMENT
3 WK.

SYLLABLES

or connou wonos

20

O:

5

IO

0
PRE
TREATMENT

I

«3

4 -6

7-9

IO-I2

POST
TREAT—

MENT
I
WK.

TREATMENT
ZWK.

INTERVAL OF TREATMENT

Fig.1

Following termination of therapy, the decrement in learning is
completely reversible, so that the mean errors are signiﬁcantly fewer
than pretreatment. For the untreated group, the errors decreased in
each of the simulated intervals of electroshock (Fig. 1), probably due
to the factor of practice.
These data for original and interpolated learning indicate therefore
that a signiﬁcant decrement is obtained during electroshock which is
reversible after termination of therapy when intra-individual comparisons are made. This observation conﬁrms previous reports 1—4.
(II) Recall-Interpolation and N o-Interpolation.
On tests of recall of learned words after interpolation, the decrement from pretreatment was signiﬁcant at the l per cent level for all
intervals of treatment in the electroshock group. In contrast with the
original and interpolated learning which was ﬁrst signiﬁcantly altered
during the 4—6 treatment period, the recall function was signiﬁcantly
impaired within the 1—-3 interval (Fig. 2).
When evaluations are made of recall of the learned word lists after
reading “Life” magazine (“no-interpolation”), the changes are similar

�92

Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

.

RELATION OF RECALL OF COMMON WORDS
TO ELECTROSHOCK TREATMENT

RECALLED

WORDS

COMMON

a "°__-_

.—a

o——--""°

MEAN

ELECTROSHOCK GROUP

+——+ no INTERPOLATION
o mrenpounou
UNTREATED GROUP

4----+

o---c

PRE
TREATMENT

l-3

4-6

7-9

IO-IZ

POST
TREATMENT
l

WK.

POST
TREATMENT
2 WK.

N0 INTERPOLATION
INTERPOLATION

POST
TREATMENT
3 WK.

INTERVAL OF TREATMENT

Fig. 2

to those obtained for original and interpolated learning. These observations indicate that the type of activity interposed between an
original learning and a later measurement of retention is an important
and useful factor in eliciting subtle changes in function. Post therapy,
the decrement is reversible for both interpolation and no-interpolation
recall.
The foregoing results indicate that a signiﬁcant memory change
occurs within the 1—3 treatment period and that recall following interpolation is a more sensitive measure of change in function than
learning.
(III) Relation of Recall and Learning Responses to Improvement.
In the analysis of individual data for the relation of recall function
to clinical improvement, the scores of 38 patients, treated three times
3
Of
assessed.
week
for
least
weeks,
these, twenty-nine
were
at
per
showed a pattern of decrement in recall function (scores of zero or
below pretreatment). Of the matched controls, four showed the same
pattern of decrement in recall in a similar testing period while seventeen showed no decrement.

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

93

The treated patients were then characterized as to improved,
moderately improved, and unimproved by the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electroshock treatment unit. The number of
subjects in each group are tabulated according to memory loss in
Table 1.
'

TABLE

1

Decrement and No Decrement Groups During Recall Compared
with Respect to Degree of Improvement

Improved
Moderately Improved
Unimproved

Decrement

No Decrement

l2

2

4

1

13

6

To facilitate statistical study the improved and moderately improved groups are combined, and compared with the unimproved
group. A chi square of .22 indicates that no signiﬁcant difference
between these two groups exists. Thus, there is no indication that
clinical improvement is necessarily related to decrement on interpolated recall tests.
Following this analysis for recall, the data for the learning of
common words is similarly evaluated. Of the 38 patients, 26 showed
a pattern of decrement in learning function (number of errors above
pre-treatment), and 13 showed no decrement (errors below pretreatment score). In the control group of 21 subjects, only one subject
was in the decrement range.
When these patients are grouped according to their psychiatric
ratings, there is an apparent relationship between improvement and
decrement in learning (Table 2). This relationship, however, is not
statistically signiﬁcant by the chi square test. It is concluded,
therefore, that no relation exists between clinical improvement and
decrement in the pattern of learning.
The above patterns of response are based primarily on changes
during the 4—6 and 7—9 intervals of treatment. For the majority of
patients, these are points of maximum decrement, and at such times
electroshock therapy was reduced or discontinued. Five patients,
however, were treated three times per week for 18 or more treatments.
Clinical changes during this period were minimal and following

.

�Korin, Fink and Kwalwasser, Relation of Changes

94:

TABLE

2

Comparison of Degree of Decrement During Learning
with Ratings of Improvement
Decrement

+++

++

Improved

7

(44%)

3

Moderately
Improved

2

(40%)

0

Unimproved

4 (24%)

3

No Decrement
—
——

+

(18.5%)

2

(12.5%)

l (20%)
(18.5%)

3

(18.5%)

2

(12.5%)

2

(12.5%)

1

(20%)

1

(20%)

1

(6%)

6

(35%)

termination of therapy, all were rated as unimproved. The learning
patterns in these patients remained at a minimal or no decrement
level throughout. For recall following interpolation, however, these
patients showed a decrement during treatment with scores below
both pretreatment and also post therapy. Thus, these patients did
show evidence of brain dysfunction by the more sensitive recall interpolation variable. Nevertheless, failure to develop changes in the
learning function after relatively prolonged treatment suggests that
improvement is unlikely when there is minimal brain dysfunction.
This interpretation of the data is supported by the ﬁndings of Kahn
and Fink 15 who, in this laboratory, used the electroencephalogram
and Amytal tests 16 as indices of cerebral change, and found a high
correlation between degree of brain dysfunction and improvement.
Discussion

In similar investigations of memory function with lists of words and
syllables, the learning task was completed before therapy and recall
was tested at varying intervals after termination of therapy. In this
study serial measures of change in learning and recall obtained on the
day following treatment are assessed. As group data, they verify the
ﬁndings of other investigators that signiﬁcant decrements in learning
and recall functions occur during electroshock which are reversible
by the third week following termination of therapy.
Recall after interpolation is the most sensitive indicator of dysfunction. For this variable, a signiﬁcant pattern of decrement is
evident in 29 of 38 of the electroshock group. Thus, the majority of
these patients show some quantiﬁable memory change during treat-

�in Memory and Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

95

in
the
occurs
impairment
signiﬁcant
a
memory
ment. Furthermore,
24
hours
measurable
is
1—3
which
the
treatments
between
week
ﬁrst
electroReiter
the
is
This
though
EST.
even
true
after the single
stimulator used here is reported to minimize amnestic eﬁ'ects. During
and
second
the
is
during
only
signiﬁcant
the
impairment
learning,
week
7—9
4th
the
In
and
interval).
(4—6
of
weeks
treatment
third
This
of
the
scores.
less
is
learning
there
impairment
(10—12 interval)
of
method
treatment
of
is
artefact
particular
a
an
however,
change,
clinical
favorable
reduced
is
a
as
electroshock
frequency
whereby
7—9 interval, the
the
between
Thus,
becomes
apparent.
response
20
others are on reand
discontinued
is
12
of
patients
treatment
of
the
mefor
peak
most
patients
Nevertheless,
duced treatment.
ninth
and
treatments.
fourth
the
between
reached
is
decrement
mory
time.
this
derived
is
beneﬁt
at
therapeutic
Seemingly, greatest
When the patients categorized according to individual patterns of
their
with
ratings
and
compared
recall
are
both
learning
in
response
of improvement, a relatively high proportion with marked memory
brain
that
dysfunction
This
ﬁnding
fail
suggests
to
improve.
changes
induce
sufﬁcient
is
a
to
recall
and
not
measured
learning
36
by
as
per
Wilcox
her
in
reached
conclusion
A
by
similar
was
effect.
therapeutic
13.
this
in
The
data
study
confusion
of
to
relation
of
therapy
the
study
further indicate that when only minimal memory impairment deveresult.
is
to
likely
no
improvement
after
prolonged treatment,
lops
While some of the patients in this study seemed to beneﬁt thera-

peutically with minimal memory impairment within ten treatments,
of
indices
brain
dysother
with
marked
showed
changes
usually
they
15. As these patients are
and
EEG
test
the
Amytal
such
function
as
in
rather
treatdiscontinued
early
reduced
or
frequency
placed on
receivwith
them
patients
is
to
there
no opportunity
compare
ment,
similar
fashion,
basis.
In
week
times
three
a
20
a
on
treatments
ing
also
has
and
of
lack
improvement
no
between
change
a relationship
been observed in a study of eosinophile levels following electroshock 17.
is
here
measured
not
as
induced
the
impairment
Although
memory
subtle
remains
that
the
possibility
related
to
improvement,
directly
7» 3
memories
selective
of
the
facilitate
repression
changes
memory
reinforce
which
such
denial,
reactions
defensive
as
of
or the emergence
mechanisms
defense
15.
these
induced
by
behavior
in
Changes
changes
used in this
those
than
other
with
measurable
be
techniques
may
study.

�Korin,Fink and Kwalwasser

96

Summary and Conclusion
Studies of changes in learning and recall function during electroshock were undertaken.
Group data indicated: (1) a signiﬁcant decrement in the recall of
common words following the interpolated learning of nonsense
syllables which persisted during all intervals of treatment (P = .01)
for both intra- and inter-group comparisons; (2) a signiﬁcant decrement in learning at the 4—6 and 7—9 interval of treatment where
change from intra-individual pretreatment scores was maximum;
(3) the return of both learning and recall functions to the pretreatment
level or better within 3 weeks of termination of treatment.
Analysis of individual patterns of response indicated that 29 of
32 patients showed a pattern of decrement following recall with interpolation during treatment.
When the improved and unimproved patients were evaluated
res P ectin g the P resence of memorY imP airment, no si gniﬁcant diﬂ'erence was obtained between the two groups.
It is concluded that electroshock with the Reiter CW 47 C electrostimulator (1) induces memory change as measured here and that
such change is reversible; (2) that marked memory changes are not
a prerequisite for improvement but that (3) the lack of marked
memory changes with 20 treatments is associated with lack of improvement.
Bibliography
2
—
1947.
abnorm.
206,
Brower, D., and S. OppenP.: J.
soc. Psychol. 42,
heim: J. gen. Psychol. 45, 171, 1951. — 3 Luborsky, L. B.: J. nerv. ment. Dis. 107,
531, 1948. - 4 Michael, S. T.: Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. Chicago 71, 362, 1954. —
5
Brody, M. D.: J. ment. Sci. 90, 777, 1944. 6 Zubin, J.: J. Personality 17, 33,
1948. 7 Janis, I. L..' J. Personality 17, 29, 1948. — 8 Janis, I. L., and M. Astrachan:
9
—
1951.
Wilcox, K. W.: Papers of Michigan
abnorm.
501,
46,
Psychol.
soc.
J.
1“ Liberson, W. T., and
—
1949.
Arts
and
of
Letters
35,
357,
Science,
Academy
P. H. Wilcox: Digest Neurol. Psychiat. 13, 292, 1945. 11 Hoch, P. H., and L. B.
Kalinowsky: Shock Therapy: Psychosurgery and Other Somatic Procedures in
— 12 Kennedy, C. J. C., and D. Anchel:
&amp;
1952.
New
York
Grune
Stratton,
Psychiatry.
13
—
1942.
Wilcox, K. W.: Conﬁn. neurol. 14, 318, 1954. 317,
22,
Psychiat. Quart.
14
Stevens, S. S.: Handbook of Experimental Psychology. J. Wiley &amp; Sons, N.Y.
1951. — 15 Kahn, R. L., and M. Fink: Relationship between Altered Brain Function
and Denial in Electroshock Therapy. Presented at American Psychiatric Association
Meeting in Atlantic City, May 1955. — 1“ Weinstein, E. A., R. L. Kahn, L. A. Sugar17
1953.
Amer.
L.
Alexander, S. P., and J.
and
Linn:
109,
389,
J. Psychiat.
man
F. Neander: Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chicago) 69, 368, 1953.

1

Stone, C.

—

——

——

——

�April 15, 1955

Relation of Changes in

Memory and

Learning to Improvement in Electroshock*

by
Hyman
Max

Korin, M.S. (1)

Fink, rm”).

(2)

and
Simon Kwalwasser, M49. (3)

From

the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, ulen Uaks,

New York

*This investigation'was supported (in part) by a research grant
from the National

Institute of

HA92?

Mental Health, Public Health Service:

(1) Research.Assistant (peychology)
(2) Director of Research
(3) Associate Medical Director

�Relation of Changes in

Memory

and.Learning to Improvement in Electroshock

In the course of studies of the relation between altered brain function
and improvement following electroshock therapy, the present investigation of
memory

functions

was

undertaken.

variables, an attempt is

made

serial testing of learning

By

first

to study and quantify

and

recall

memory changes; and

then to determine the relationship between therapeutic outcome and such changes.

effects during electroshock therapy are commonly observed, and
are both of practical and theoretical interest. Although differences in methodAmnestic

ology, materials, subjects and electroconvulsive techniques make

direct

compar-

ison difficult, a few conclusions related to the question of concern in this
study can be derived from published investigations.
The

majority of investigators state that no significant

other intellectual impairment remains
study, (5) however, noted that

two

memory

loss of

or three weeks after treatment (l-h).

patients, otherwise fully recovered, reported defects affecting long familiar names of persons and places, lasting a
year or more. Zubin, (6) found no indication that electroshock destroyed.mems
One

5

cry traces, and concluded that where memory loss

persists, the progress is

one

of slow recovery rather than obliteration.

In studies of personal memories selective circumscribed amnesias at

least four

and

five

weeks

after therapy are described for material elicited in

pretreatment interviews (7) (8).

The amnesias, however,

to subtle emotional factors, rather than permanent

vations, Janis (8) postulates that

are construed as due

loss. From such obserb
facilitates repressions and

memory

memory impairment

thereby reduces affective desturbances.
Regarding the qestion of memory impairment as a prerequisite

for improv-

that three techniques of electroconvulsive therapy,
"
"
the
the
standard or Carletti and the "brain-facil"organic shock",
namely,
ement, Wilcox (9) notes

itation

"

techniques, are based on concepts which attribute varying degrees of

importance to amnestic change, Studies based on the "brain-fanilitation" tech»

�-2nique where the low current type Reiter and 'brief-stimnlus' electro-stimulators

are used, emphasize the diminished

memory change

induced as compared to the "stand~

ard technique", although reported therapeutic results are analogous. (10)
Kalinowsky (11), believe the "standard" technique

is

Koch and

the most effective therap-

clinicians using the "organic-shock" method hold that a
therapeutic
of
electroshock
is essential for
success (12). In a
regressive type

eutically;

and numerous

specific study of this problem, Wilcox (13) recently found

no

relation between

either the treatment induced confusion seen immediately following
initial Reiter electroshock, or after a series of ten electroshocks.

improvement and

an

METHOD AND MATERIALS.

The

ment and 21

subjects are ho consecutive patients referred for electroshock treatuntreated controls at Hillside Hospital.

The

clinical diagnosis in

the electroshock patients include involutional depression, 7; manic depressive
psychosis, 18; reactive depression, h; paranoid schizophrenia, 3; catatonic
schizophrenia,

5 and

hebephrenic schizophrenia, 3. The depressed patients tend

to be older - between to and

68

years of age; the schizophrenic patients are young-

years. For the untreated group, patients designated as
possible electroshock candidates were selected. They are a represenative sample

er, between

2h and he

of the electroshock group matched proportionately with reSpect to diagnosis, age,
education and previous electroshock treatment.
The

was

Reiter

CW

h?

C

electrostimulator

was used

in all cases. Treatment

administered every day, and was reduced after the second week depending on

the clinical condition of the patient.

test of the ability of patients
to recall an original learning of lists of eight, three letter common words, at
weekly intervals under two conditions: (a) immediately after an interpolated learning of a list of nonsense syllables; (b) after a ten minute rest period during
which a copy of "Life" magazine is read.
Methodologically, the study involves a

�The

choice of testing method and materials was based on Studies in retro-

active inhibition which indicate that the degree of retention of a learning task

varies with thetype of activity interposed between an original learning and the
later measurement of retention. Thus, by interpolating nonsense syllables and

test days each week, two indicators of recall function of varying sensitivity is obtained.
In the test procedure lists of common words and nonsense syllables are

the reading of a magazine on separate

arranged according to established experimental procedures respecting successive
consonants and vowels (1h). Each

cards by the examiner.

The time

list

of words was presented manually on flash

interval of exposure

was

not definite during

learning and seldom exceeded five seconds. For recall, however, 10 seconds

was

uniformly permitted.

lists for the interpolation condition the
maximum of ten trials; or less if the list was

In the presentation of the
words were presented

earlier.

The

list

for a

common

learned

of nonsense syllables was then similarly presented. In the

no-interpolation condition the learning procedure

was

similar, except that reading

"Life" magazine was substituted for the nonsense syllables. Each condition was

tested weekly
The

on non-electroshock days,

control group

was

alternating between successive treatments.

tested in the

same way,

twice weekly for five weeks, to

simulate the testing for 12 electroshock treatments. Following completion of

treat-

ratings of improvement were determined independently by the supervising psychiatrist on the basis of observations of ward behavior and psychiatric interviews.

ment,

The improved

patients

were those

in

whom

and.whose acute symptoms had subsided.

there

was a marked change

In the moderate improved group, there was

a transient change in behavior but symptoms persisted.
were those

in

in behavior.

whom symptoms

in behavior,

persisted or increased

and

The unimproved

in

whom

patients

there was no change

�RESULTS

1. Original and.Interpolated Learning -

in learning function occurred during treatment in the electrogroup. This was seen in the increased mean number of failures to learn the
and syllables as the number of treatments increased (Fig.1). The decrement
Impairment

shock
words

in learning is maximal in the

h—6

and 7-9 electroshock periods.

In the

10—12

treatment period this decrement in learning ability decreases. This decrease
be

the result of a change in therapy from three to two treatments weekly in

of the patients.

\

Considerable recovery in learning function occurs when

at 3-h

ments are administered

day

mean

many

treat.

intervals.

Following termination of therapy, the decrement

reversible, so that the

may

in learning is completely

errors are significantly fewer than pretreatment.

For the untreated group, the errors decreased

in each of the simulated intervals

of electroshock (Fig. 1), probably due to the factor of practice.

This'data for original and interpolated learning indicates therefore that a
reversible
which
obtained
significant-decrement is
during electroshock
after
is
termination of therapy

when

intra-individual comparisons are

made.

This obser-

_vation confirms previous reports (l—h).

II.

Recall—Interpolation and no-Interpolation Ontests of recall of learned.words

from pretreatment'was

significant at the

l

after interpolation, the

per cent level for

decrement

all intervals

of

treatment inThe electroshock group. In contrast with the original and inter-

polated learning which

was

first significantly altered

during the h-6 treatment

period, the recall function'was significantly impaired Within the 1-3 interval.
(Fig. 2)
When

evaluations are

made

of recall of the learned word

lists after

reading

"Life" magazine ("no-interpolation"), the changes are similar to those obtained

for original

and

interpolated learning.

These obserbations

indicate thatthe type

�later

of activity interposed between an original learning and a

measurement of

re-

tention is an important and useful factor in eliciting subtle changes in function.
reversible
Post therapy, the decrement is
for both interpolation and no-interpolation recall.
foregoing results indicate that a significant

The

in the 1-3 treatment period
sensitive measure of change

III.

occurs with-

that recall following interpolation is
in function than learning.
and

a more

Relation of Recall and Learning Responses to Improvement In the analysis of individual data for the relation of recall fun-

ction to clinical improvement, the scores of
week

memory change

for at least

3

weeks, were assessed.

Of

38

patients, treated three times per

these, twenty-nine showed a pattern

of decrement in recall function (scores of zero or below pretreatment).

of the

pattern of decrement in recall in a similar

matched controls, four showed the same

testing period while seventeen showed no decrement.
The treated patients were then r‘cate'gorizled. as to improved, moderately improved, and unimproved by the supervising psychiatrist in charge of the electro~

unit. The number of subjects in each group are tabulated accordloss in Table 1.

shock treatment

ing to memory
Table

I.

Decrement and No Decrement Groups During Recall Compared with Reapect to Degree of Improvement.
Decrement

Improved

12

Moderately Improved

h

Unimproved
To

No

13

facilitate statistical study the

Decrement
2

’

1
6

improved and moderately improved groups

are combined, and compared with the unimproved group. A chi square of .22 indicates that no significant difference between these two groups exists. Thus,

there is no indication that clinical improvement is necessarily related to decrement on interpolated

recall tests.

�this analysis for recall, the data for the learning of common words
is similarly evaluated. Of the 38 patients, 25 showed a pattern of decrement in
Following

learning function (number of errors above pre-treatment), and

(errors below pre-treatment score). In the control group of

ment

only one subject was
When

is

13 showed no

in the decrement range.

relationship between improvement and decrement in learning (Table 2).

is not statistically significant

This relationship, however,
concluded, therefore

decrement

subjects,

21

these patients are grouped according to their psychiatric ratings, there

an apparent

It is

decre-

that

by the chi square

relation exists between clinical

no

test.

improvement and

in the pattern of learning.
Comparison of Degree of decrement During Learning with Ratings of
Improvement.

Table 2:

Decrement

+++
7(ML%)

3(1805%)

Improved

2(h0%)

0

Unimproved

h(2h%)

3(18.5%)

Improved

Moderately

++

-

+

No

Decrement

-

2(12 05%)

2(1205%)

2(1205%)

1(20%

l(20%)

l(20%)

3(18.5%)

1(6%)

6(35%)

patterns of response are based primarily on changes during the
and 7-9 intervals of treatment. For the majority of patients, these are
The above

h—6

at such times electroshock therapy was reduced
or discontinued. Five patients, however, were treated three times per week for
18 or more treatments. Clinical changes during this period were minimal and

points of

maximum

decrement, and

following termination of therapy,

all

were rated as unimproved.

patterns in these patients remained at a minimal or
For

recall following interpolation,

however, these

no decrement

patients

The

learning

level throughout.

showed a decremhnt

during treatment with scores below both pretreatment and also post therapy.

these patients did

show

Thus,

evidence of brain dysfunction by the more sensitive re-

call interpolation variable. 1“evertheless, failure to develop changes in the
learning function after relatively prolonged treatment suggests that improvement
is unlikely when there is minimal brain dysfunction. This interpretation of the

�data

is

supported by the findings of Kahrland Fink (15) who, in this laboratory,

used the electroencephalogram and Amytal tests (16) as indices of cerebral change,
and found a high, correlation between degree of brain dysfunction and improvement.
DISCUSSION

In similar investigations of
the learning task

memory

function with

lists

of words and syllables,

before therapy and recall was tested at varying

was completed

intervals after termination of therapy. In this study serial measures of change
in learning and recall obtained on the day following treatment are assessed. As
group data, they

verify the findings of other investigators that significant decrements in learning and recall functions occur during electroshock which are reversible by the third week following termination of therapy.
Recall after interpolation
For

is the

most

this variable, a significant pattern of

sensitive indicator of dysfunction.
decrement

is evident in

the electroshock group. Thus, the majority of these patients show
memory change

in the first
the single

some

of 38 of

quantifiable

during treatment. F'urthermore, a significant memory impairment occurs

week between

This

EST.

is reported to

29

the 1-3 treatments which

is true

even though the Reiter

minimize amnestic

effects.

measurable 2h hours

after

electrostimulator used here

During learning, the impairment

significant only during the second and third

terval). In the hth

is

is

weeks of treatment (h-6 and 7-9

in,

interval) there is less impairment of the learning scores. This change, however, is an artefact of a particular method of treatweek (10-12

ment whereby electroshock frequency
becomes apparent.

is

reduced as a favorable

clinical response

Thus, between the 7-9

interval, 12 patients are discontinued
and 20 others are reduced. Nevertheless, for most patients the peak of memory
decrement is reached between the fourth and ninth treatments. Seemingly, greatest

therapeutic benifit is derived at this time.
When

the patients categorized according to individual patterns of response

in both recall and learning are

compared with

their ratings of

improvement, a

�relatively high proportion with marked memory changes fail to improve. This
finding suggests that brain dysfunction pg; §g_as measured by learning and

recall is not sufficient to induce a therapeutic effect. A similar conclusion
was reached by Wilcox in her study of the relation of confusion to therapy(13).
The data in this study further indicates that when only minimal memory impair-

after prolonged treatment,
of the patients in this study

ment develops

no improvement

While some

seemed

is likely to result.

to benefit therapeutically with

minimal memory impairment within ten treatments, they usually showed marked

test

changes with other indices of brain dysfunction such as the.EEG and.Amytal

(15).

As

these patients are placed on reduced frequency or discontinued rather

early in treatment,'ueiris

no

opportunity to compare then with patients re-

ceiving 20 treatments on a three times a week basis. In similar fashion, a

relationship between lack of change and

also been observed.
in a study of eosinophile levels following electroshock (17).
no improvement has

Although the induced memory impairment as measured here

related to improvement, the possiblity remains that subtle

ilitate

is not directly
memory changes

fac-

the repression of selective memories (7,8) or the emergence of de-

fensive reactions such as denial, which reinforce changes in behavior (18).
Changes induced by these defense mechanisms may be measurable with techniques

other than those used in this study.

�SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Studies of changes in learning and recall function during electroshock were
undertaken.

data indicated: (1) a significant decrement in the recall of common
words following the interpolated learning of nonsense syllatles which persisted
Group

all intervals

during

of treatment (P

=

.01) for both

intra

parisons; (2) a significant decrement in learning at the

and

h—é

enter group

and 7-9

comp

interval

of treatment where change from intra-individnal pretreatment scores was max(3) the return of both learning and

imum;

level or better within

3 weeks

recall functions to the pretreatment

of termination of treatment.

Analysis of individual patterns of response indicated that 29 of 32 pat-

ients

Showed

a pattern of decrement following

recall with interpolation during

treatment.
When

the improved and unimproved patients were evaluated respecting the

presence of memory impairment, no significant difference was obtained between

the two greups.

It is
or induces
2)

that

that electroshock with the Reiter CW h? C electrostimnlat-“
change as measured here and that such change is reversible;

concluded
memory

prerequisite for improvement but that'changes with 20 treatments is associated with lack

marked memory changes are not a

3) the lack of marked memory

of improvement.

�[REFERENCES

l.

Stone, C.P.: Losses and Gains in Cognitive Functions as Related to Electroconvulsive Shocks, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
ha: 2-6-21u, (April) 19u7.

8.:

Effects of Electrcshock Therapy on Mental
Functions as Revealed by Psychological Tests, Journal of General Psychology, g5: 171-188, (April) 1951.

Brewer, D. and Oppenheim,

,The

Luborsky, L.B.: Psychometric Changes During Electric Shock Treatment, JOur.
Nerv. and Ment. Disl, 191: 531-536, (June) l9h8.
-

Michael, S.T.: Impairment of Mental lfunction During Electric convulsive
Therapy, A.M.A. Arch.Neurol. and Psychiat. 11:362-366, 195k.
Brody, M.D.:

Zubin,

J.:

Prolonged Memory Defects Following Electrotherapy, Jbur. Ment.
Sci. 90: 777-779, (July) 19hh

Functioning in Patients treated with Electric Shock Therapy, Journ/ pf Berspnality, 17: 33-h1, (April) l9h8.

Memory

Janis, I.L.:

Fellowing “lectroc Convulsive Treatments, JOurn.
of Personality, 11: 29-32, (April) 19h8.
Memory Loss

Janis, I.L.and.Astrachan, M.: The Effect of Electroconrulsive Treatments
on Memory Efficiency, Journ. Abner. and boc. Psych., ﬁg; 501511, (October) 1951.

9. wilcox.

.

K;W;: Psychological Studies in ﬁlectroshock Therapy, Michigan
Academy of Science, Arts and J«etters,
357-368, l9h9.

ii:

Electric Uonvulsive Therapy:

10. Liberson, W.T. and wilcox, PlH.:

Comparison

of Brief Stimuli Technique with the Friedman Wilcox - Reiter
Technique, ”igest Neural. and Psychiat. 12; 292-302, l9h5.
—

L.B.: Shock Therapy: Psychosurgery and Uther
Somatic Procedures in Psychiatry, Grune and Stratton, New York

Hoch, P.H. and Kalinowsky,

1952.

12. Kennedy, C.J.C., and Anchel,D.: Regressive Electric Shock Thur: Treatment
in Schizophrenics Refractory to Other Shock Therapies, Psychiat.
Quart. ﬁg; 317, 19h2.
13. Wilcox, K.W.:

finia

S.S. Stevens:

1951.

15.

Confusion and Therapy in Electroconvulsive Treatment, ConNeurologica, lg; 318-326, l95h.
Handbook of Experimental Psychology,

J.

Wiey and Sons, N.Y.,

Fink,M .: Relationship Between Altered Brain unction and
Denial in Electroshock Therapy, Presented at American Psychiatriﬂ
Associatimn, May 1955.

Kahn, R .L. and

-

�.12-

16. Whinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L., 5ugarman, L.A., and Linn, L.: The Diagnostt
Use of Amobarbital Sodium ("Amytal Dodiumf') In Brain Disease,
Amer. Jour. Psych. ;92: 889-89h, (June) 1953.
17. Alexander, S. P. and Neander, J.F1: Adrenocortical Responsivity to Electic
Shock Therapy and Insulin Therapy, Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat.
92: 368-371;, (March) 1953.

�up“

ELECTROSHOCK RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
DFF'GERS 1954‘1955

DR. PHILIP a. REED, (Ex-Plaza.)
1800 E. TENTH S12, INDIANAFULIS 1. IND.
on. TITUB H_ HARRIS,
316 STRAND, BALVESTDN, TEXAS
DR. HOWARD D. FAEINB
2314 AUBURN AVENUE, CINCINNATI 19. :1th
DR. ERNEST H. PARSONS

DR. BERNARD L. PAGELLA, FEES.
a. 5131. 57.. New YORK 21. N. Y.
DR. WILLIAM L. HOLT, dﬂq VICE-FEES.
ALBANY HOSPITAL. ALBANY, N. Y.
DR. PAUL H. WILCDX, SEC'Y-TREAI.
526 w. TENTH 5T.. TRAVERBE ClTv. MIGHi

us

(“dun“)

nggg;
may

PRLLE AWARD

8, 1955

Atlantic City, m.J.
Prize Paper:
at

on

of

Uh

'earnin to

es ‘n memorr nd

in electroshock

1m

rovement

by

Korin, a.S.
Fink, M.D.

Hyman

max

and

Simen nwalwasser, m.D.
hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

m.r.

the Prize Committee, wish to congratulate the
authors on their excellent paper. Our decision was made because
this paper is based on a carefully worked out research design
and reports the development of a sensitive measure of the
transient mental impairment occurring following elecﬁpshock
convulsions. We anticipate that this method will have broad
ap;licatmon in the evaluation of the various physiodynamic
We,

therapies."

Enclosed herewith is a check for $100.00 to be
divided among the authors.

iguana

liBernard L. Pacella, m.u.
i

M;

ta

”William L.

«4 /,/%
7w,
3m.
nolt, dr.,
:7

7v
-

.

~p

.

MIA/Mb»
PM
Paul
Wilcox,
H.

m.u.

The Electroshock Research Association is incorporated under the laws of Michigan as a non-proﬁt corporation to promote
and coordinate research and clinical investigations regarding electroshock therapy and related therapies in mental diseases.

�w.-b ::

m and Clinical threats 0: New
Wattle amdmguith maptic pregame: aniline-ta theme:
Sam Medias have iadieatad

meme},

its

nee thnnuwith untrusel and

in aativeting the

m.

pnamt away emeem

r

_
_

ephrenia and
suspected

that

tint 1a” aypmhmian mm

it in a safer and antler drug

Heginida also has an enema-barbiturate
an evaluatim

with

ta use
effect. a»

at these properties at agenda.

ho patients with

meal aim”, chieﬂy achie-

invelatiml «pneum, as well as more}.

We brain disease, mm studied.

with definite er

gums mid. it is available in
sciatica: for m. mention at a mum. emu-sum a: 0.5% (5 mg. in
Ice). Itmmmmuamtemedmbedyunight. This ranged
ﬂames is a

eyelie derivative ef

truth tam eaparninnta 03‘20 to 95m. perms. Thirtaonpationta
mime mama initially mum be intmveneue Mu anytal. In the

15061me
“W
amatemd.
We» Watered

remaining instances

magma
based an

was

given

The sodium

initiallyandthm
at a rate

M Wt and in am” nemmry to indme mums, alerted

speech and

Wine”.

Hasty de 619'.

altered the

:‘

m in allpatiants but

memwéwarthiaehmgevmaefmpatienttopetim. Thom

frequwt initial altemtim m the appeamm a: elm: activity at Iva-5% ape,
at low to
voltage. This was irregular,
aeeaaimnm appear»
ing in shat-t bursts, met
at the frontal and Moral electmdea,

ma

2'

but diffuse

am! always:

W

M

amtrieal.

As

wt
beam mm

the injection emtimm! the

aetivity incmaed and its appearance in bursts sometime
In a few instances
freeman The veltaga of this delta activity
of

eleva-

mm.

_

\
i
F

Presented at

the Eastern Association of Electroencephalographers, Jew York, Dec. 5, 1956.

&gt;

4
r

t

��93*

mmsmmpmmmwgwmmamim.
mﬂupnagmtermmaf
mamas:
Md
w;
mmmm,
m
m mﬁmts mm given 1mm swim «mamas, after mam
Irish”

am .6

|

GBQRIM¢

W

mt» aim amid be attained ( 1.», mama, alumd spam}: and
new) aim amiss of. man-him '31: M: 500 ms. me mm EEG mtivitw
a":
In mt
Meet! byﬁeglﬂée mm ﬁlm:

mm,
the

:

amloped. In a fw instances, hmr,
fast
activity usually pmdmd by barbiturate failed to, develop; and accumully
af slur mtiﬁ’ay irregularhr ar in mm. appeared.
mm
the usual habitat-at:

EEG

mm

SLIDE
1::
,

given 1a amounts necessary

was

03*

81m;

Mr W

ta

manna

01‘

W,W

”was mwgim‘ at“:

alarm

The meat. ski-129.22g 611223.931

at mama me the

patients:

spawn, and drums»

ammm

during the

H

‘

9.1an a: m 13mm. m patient mm mm, the

max-canned,

mmemmehdiupmd.

Atthamaof’ﬂm

wordinggwiammSwlSmmaﬂorthﬁtWﬁmwmmﬁd.

Wt.

mm

car
mums:- mm cm
patimtm alert. the
ané
clear.
meat,
pit. mindiag hula-taunt walking, as study.
m

the

W

muaﬂmmmmmmmmmmmmmnpummme
Witmm unto.
4::
the
was
“the 133%th
aux-am Motion mamas m

m
3W
moﬁmmmmmummmm

alpha nativity mtumeé m-

bursts a:

slam:

Witty

Atmendomhewwumme

in

wt mm

WWW,

and
Tim

high manage

{at maturity m managed.

��in"

as...

m

not appreciably attend by magnum: tn. these eases st barbiturate meme
12:3 in view 9f the name. alerting,
fanning
pram by I:

Wm“.

Psmgs tho stage at metabolism at museum in the
tether stats muted or barbiturate 11:12th «mime! is the pmestt
than.
study is éiftwent
in the am]. Wimto poisoning.

negate has Maptic

1..

pm

193a appmmum than mm“).
ta
in mutating gamma.

appears

to

page

2.

properties statue:- ta these es
and

mm)... It

my be an

W

drag

mmtsnmtagmmtemmemsimmmmsfmm

ital. Its

eg
the
use

Maui».

‘

tht
I

at barbiturate panning

m

further

in.»

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2454">
                <text>Relation of changes in memory and learning to improvement in electroshock. Confinia Neurologica 1956;16(2-3):88-96.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2455">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2456">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-19-023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2457">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2458">
                <text>Korin, H; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kwalwasser, s.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2459">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2460">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2461">
                <text>[Preprint] and publication. Confinia Neurologica. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Electroshock Research Association Atlantic City, New Jersey, May 8, 1955. From the Research Service of Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2462">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2463">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74448">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81009">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87570">
                <text>Basel; New York: Confinia Neurologica</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94131">
                <text>Spiegel, E. A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="254" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="45">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/a0dd669fe6ef80d3f920fa82ad004579.pdf</src>
        <authentication>922f3407ada0d1bf7f975f2fcd3d0f5a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100671">
                    <text>From

the Journal of the Hillside

Vol. VI October, 1957.

I1oslojfoait,

ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL
CUTANEOUS STIMULI1
HYMAN KORIN, PH.D.2

and

MAX FINK, M.D.3

In the course of extensive investigations (1, 2, 3) into the perception of multiple simultaneous stimuli, the pattern of failure of
subjects accurately to report one of two stimuli led to a concept of
an “order of dominance” in cutaneous perception. Since then, the
relationship of the observed pattern of dominance to biologic and
psychiatric concepts of body image and body scheme has been the
subject of considerable speculation (4, 7, 8, 14).
The interrelationship of body areas was initially clearly demonstrated in simultaneous tactile tests of face and hand (2), in which it
was noted that the stimuli to the hand were frequently not reported
or mislocalized. These phenomena of “extinction” and “displacement” led to the inference that cheek area stimuli were “dominant”
to hand stimuli. In subsequent reports (3, 10, ll, 12) a
pattern of
dominance for tactile stimuli was described in which the face and
the primary genital areas were the most perceptive or dominant
areas; the hand was the least dominant; and the shoulder, foot,
buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen fell between these extremes in a mild gradient. These observations were made in normal
adults and children and psychiatric patients, but were most clearly
discerned in patients with brain disease. Indeed, the major portion
of the data relates to a group of patients with severe diffuse brain
dysfunction under observation in a general psychiatric hospital.
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M—927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service.
2Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital.
3 Director,
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
241

�242

KORIN—FINK

unclear. In a review of the
problem (3) consideration was given to hypotheses ascribing signiﬁcance to anatomic, psychophysical, genetic, environmental and neurophysiologic factors. In their conclusions, Bender, Green and Fink
of
the
organization
“no
explains
that
adequately
theory
one
note
this pattern. Learning and maturation are probably factors, but it
brain
with
of
studies
In
inherent.”
be
patients
to
mostly
appears
disease and normal young children, Cohn (4, 5) emphasized the
rostral order of dominance and ascribed signiﬁcance to “an ontogenetic or phylogenetic thalamic residue in the sensory organization
of the human brain.” He also noted speciﬁcally that this pattern
was primarily associated with “the over-all sentient function of
the brain.”
A more extensive elaboration of a maturational and developmental explanation of the order of dominance has been proposed
(14). Taking the infantile patterns of sucking and feeding as a
model, Linn ascribes dominance to the face as it is the oldest element
in the body image; the dominant role of the genital area to the intensity of pleasurable sensation that the infant elicits from masturbation; and the subordinate position of the hand to its role as an
second
holds
it
wherein
and
appendage
tension-relieving
exploring
place in awareness to its stimulation of the more exciting mouth
and genitalia.
A neurophysiologic view was advanced by Critchley (6, 7), who,
after expressing a preference for the term “tactile inattention” instead of “extinction,” emphasized the rostral order of dominance.
He stated that “strong stimulation of the healthy side suppresses
the attenuated sensations on the impaired side,” and concluded
that “tactile inattention in parietal patients is probably no more
than an instance of local neglect or disregard, which may be demonstrated at times in many other spheres of consciousness besides the
tactile—whether motor, visual or spatial.”
A psychophysical explanation was eschewed by Bender, Fink and
Green (3, 10, 11), who found no relation between the order of
dominance and the tactile threshold for touch or pin prick. DennyBrown, Meyer and Horenstein (8), however, insisted that these patloss
of
alteration
there
when
or
was
an
only
terns were
apparent
the
that
demonstrated
exfurther
discrimination.
They
two-point
tinction of the hand stimulus by a stimulus to the leg could be
cheek
the
of
dominance
hand.
The
the
stimuli
four
to
overcome by
the
stimuli
altered
to
be
ten
by
however,
could
hand
the
not,
to
hand in their subject.

The basis for these phenomena

is”

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

243

The following data further emphasize psychophysical factors in
perception under the conditions of multiple simultaneous stimulation. These studies represent the initial report of an investigation
into the application of simultaneous tactile stimulation tests to the
problem of measurement of the alteration in brain function induced by electroshock therapy. In the course of this study electrical
stimuli were applied to the cheek and hand of psychiatric patients.
Stimuli were either at threshold or suprathreshold levels.
Two aspects of the data are presented: (a) the effect of alteration
of relative strength of stimulus in the order of dominance on facehand tests; and (b) relation of perceptual thresholds to the order of
dominance.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

The subjects were thirty-four consecutive psychiatric patients
referred for electroshock therapy. The range of their ages was between 21 and 65 and the mean age was 45. Eleven patients were
diagnosed as involutional melancholia, thirteen as manic-depressive,
depressed, eight as schizophrenia, and two as psychoneurosis mixed
type. All testing was done prior to a course of electroshock therapy
and no patient had clinical or EEG evidence of altered brain function. Each patient was tested in one session for the purposes of this
report.
Two model S-4B Grass square wave stimulators were synchronized to deliver either single or two simultaneous electrical stimuli.
An isolation unit was connected to each stimulator to eliminate
artifacts and the output was monitored visually by an oscilloscope.
A switch box inserted in the circuit permitted independent selection
of the various body parts. An active and an indifferent electrode,
required for each body part, were small 3%; inch steel discs placed
1 inch
apart and secured with tape. Bentonite electrode paste (Medcraft) was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes
were applied. The electrodes remained affixed to the selected body
parts throughout the period of testing.
The patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine position. To alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described. It was emphasized that only a slight tap-like sensation
would be felt. The electrodes were then placed on (I) the dorsum
of the hands, (2) the mandibular area of both cheeks, and (3) the
medial calf area of the legs.
In the testing procedure, thresholds for the various body parts
were ﬁrst determined. At a frequency of .3 cycles /second, and a pulse

�244

KORIN—FINK

duration of 50 milliseconds, the voltage was increased in uniform
time increments of .67 seconds (2 pulses) monitored from the oscilloscope, until the subject perceived 100 per cent of the stimuli. Increments of 5 volts were applied to the hand and increments of 1 volt
to the cheeks. After a ten-second interval, the voltage was decreased
until sensation disappeared. Following another ten-second interval,
the voltage was gradually increased by 1 volt each six seconds until
the patient again reported 100 per cent of the stimuli. This reading
was considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold

sensation.
Such stimuli, at threshold and 10 per cent above the threshold,
are reported by the subjects as a “tap,” a “prick” or a “sting.” Complaints of painful perception were not elicited at these levels of
stimulation.
After the thresholds were determined, testing with a series of
single and double simultaneous stimuli followed. The body parts
tested were the right hand and left cheek (heterologous stimulation)
and the right cheek and left cheek (homologous stimulation). Both
parts were stimulated simultaneously, or one part singly, in a mixed
order for ten trials for each of the following conditions: (1) threshold, (2) suprathreshold (10 per cent above the threshold), (3) one
body part at suprathreshold and the other at threshold, and (4) the
reverse of (3). The order of presentation of conditions (1) and (2)
was alternated for different subjects and the same was done for
conditions (3) and (4). Similarly the order of presentation of the
heterologous and homologous stimulation was alternated.
Single stimuli were introduced as a control. Failure to report
the single stimulus indicated that the threshold had changed. When
this change occurred, stimulation was increased until a new threshold was determined and ten trials were started anew.
RESULTS

Threshold Values
The threshold stimulation for perception was determined for
the hands, cheeks and legs (Table I). The threshold values for the
hands and legs are three to four times higher than the thresholds
for the cheeks. While the threshold values in the legs are less than
in the hands, these differences lack statistical signiﬁcance. Variability of the threshold is considerably greater in the hands and legs
than in the cheeks. There is virtually no overlapping of thresholds,
however, Where the cheeks and the hands are concerned.
A.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

245

I
Mean Thresholds and Standard Deviations of Body Parts
TABLE

Mean
Thresholds (volts)
Standard
Deviation

Right

Cheek

Left
Cheek

Right
Hand

Left
Hand

Right

Leg

Left
Leg

6.76

7.85

29.25

22.35

24.50

19.52

4.47

4.86

14.88

13.60

13.99

13.64

Extinction Patterns
The difference between the number of extinctions of the right
hand or the left cheek on stimulation of both parts with either
threshold or suprathreshold stimuli was not signiﬁcant (Table II).
Also, when both cheeks were stimulated with either threshold or
suprathreshold stimuli, there were no differences in the number of
extinctions in each cheek (Table III).
In contrast to these observations, stimulating one body part with
a suprathreshold stimulus and the other at threshold resulted in a
signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the body part stimulated
at threshold. Thus the cheek was dominant over the hand, or the
hand was dominant over the cheek depending on the body part to
which the stronger stimulus was applied (Table II). Altering the
relative strength of the stimuli applied to the cheeks resulted in a
similar predictable change in the pattern of dominance (Table III).
Further analysis of the data in Table II indicates that the hand
B.

TABLE

II

Mean Extinctions of Cheek and Hand for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Mean
Extinctions Extinctions
of Hand
of Cheek
Hand and Cheek at
Threshold
Hand and Cheek at
Suprathreshold
Hand at Suprathreshold
and Cheek at Threshold
Cheek at Suprathreshold
and Hand at Threshold

Difference Signiﬁcance

1.55

1.56

.01

NS.

1.02

.59

.57

NS.

2.30

.22

2.08

p&lt;.01

.32

1.36

1.04

p&lt;.01

�KORIN—FINK

246

was dominant over the cheek with greater mean frequency (2.08)
than the cheek was dominant over the hand (1.04) for the thresholdsuprathreshold condition. This tendency is also evident when both

parts were simulated at suprathreshold. If it is considered that the
mean threshold for the hands is approximately 30 volts, while for
the cheeks the threshold is 7 volts, the difference in incidence of
extinction may be explained. Suprathreshold stimulation was set
at 10 per cent above the threshold value. The hand stimulus was
TABLE 111

Mean Extinctions of Both Cheeks for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Extinctions
of Left
Cheek

Mean
Extinctions
of Right
Cheek

Difference

Signiﬁcance

Threshold

.39

.45

.06

N.S.

Both Cheeks at
Suprathreshold
Right Cheek at

.18

.37

.19

NS.

.96

.14

.82

p&lt;.05

.03

1.28

1.25

p&lt;.01

Both Cheeks at

Suprathreshold and
Left Cheek at Threshold
Left Cheek at Suprathreshold and Right
Cheek at Threshold

therefore increased by 3 volts and the face stimulus by only 1 volt
above the threshold value. Such an increase, although proportionately equivalent, appears to have given greater relative strength to
the hand stimulus.

Extinction
Regardless of pattern, the mean total of the number of extinctions was greater when heterologous body parts were stimulated at
threshold than when these parts were stimulated with suprathreshold stimuli (Table IV). For these same conditions of stimulation the
dilferences between the mean number of extinctions obtained on
homologous stimulation of the cheeks lack statistical signiﬁcance,
but the results are in the direction which indicate that a greater
number of extinctions occur when two body parts are stimulated
at threshold (Table IV). The failure to obtain a signiﬁcant difference in the latter instance is partly due to the fact that relatively few
C. Incidence of

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
TABLE

247

IV

Mean of Combined Number of Extinctions For Varying Conditions
of Threshold and Suprathreshold“ Stimuli

Both Parts at Both Parts at A-Suprathreshold A-Threshold
Threshold Suprathreshold B-Threshold
B-Suprathreshold
A-Cheek

B-Hand

3.11

1.63

1.68

2.43

.85

.56

1.31

1.10

A-Left Cheek

B-Right Cheek
*

Differences between the mean number of extinctions at threshold and the
other three conditions of stimulation are signiﬁcant for the cheek and hand but
are insigniﬁcant for both cheeks.

extinctions are elicited when homologous parts are stimulated.
These ﬁndings on the total number of extinctions are in agreement
with previous observations (2).
DISCUSSION

The pattern of extinction followingelectrical stimulation of the
skin with threshold and suprathreshold stimuli has been determined.
In contrast to the ﬁndings of investigators (3) who used clinical
(tactile) stimulation, the face stimuli were not reported more frequently than the hand stimuli. Under the conditions of the method
of testing in this investigation, nevertheless, it is clear that the
pattern of extinction for any two body parts can be readily altered
by varying the relative strength of the stimuli. Thus a suprathreshold stimulus applied to the hand tends to obscure a threshold stimulus applied to the cheek and when these stimulus intensities are
reversed, the cheek tends to obscure the hand.
Theories which hold that dominance of the cheek over the hand,
in Simultaneous tactile testing, is due to an inherent factor, perceived body image, rostral dominance, developmental principle or a
learned factor, are not supported by these observations under our
conditions of testing. If any of these factors were involved, a pattern
of face dominance should have been elicited when the hand and
cheeks were stimulated with equivalent electrical stimuli at threshold and suprathreshold intensities, despite the methodological dif-

�248

KORIN—FINK

ference introduced by the procedure of afﬁxing electrodes to the
skin.
The ﬁndings in this study, namely that differences in the strength
of the simultaneous stimuli can alter the pattern of extinction, supin
differences
inference,
By
hypothesis.
stimulus-intensity
a
ports
threshold also play a signiﬁcant role.
That an intense stimulus elsewhere can raise the pain threshold
and
Wolf
demonstrated
been
has
by
Hardy,
35
much
cent
as
as
per
Goodell (13). This effect of a relatively intense stimulus on the
threshold of another stimulus has also been found by investigators
how
however,
still
remains,
The
stimuli
9).
problem
(8,
other
using
it is that a pattern of dominance may be elicited when presumably
stimuli.
touch
stimuli
by
are
applied
equivalent
The results of this study suggest an explanation. Stimuli of
for
sensation
threshold
elicit
a
to
intensities
are required
differing
various body parts. When these stimuli are increased 10 per cent,
the resultant stimuli are proportional and are perceived as equivastimuli
the
two
body
in
parts,
touching
clinically
lent. In contrast,
are disproportionate relative to the threshold value although apthe
of
Because
their
in
of
application.
intensity
equal
proximately
differences in threshold for the hand and cheek, the tactile stimulus
the
than
threshold
the
above
is
more
cheek
the
proportionately
to
stimulus to the hand. Thus the cheek is perceived more frequently
than the hand stimulus and has been considered “dominant.”
A threshold hypothesis was rejected (3) on the basis that the
thresholds obtained by von Frey (16) for pressure and pain do not
double
the
elicited
order
by
dominance
the
to
strictly correspond
simultaneous stimulation tests. Most difﬁcult to reconcile is von
which
the
of
threshold
penis,
glans
the
that
Frey’s ﬁnding
pressure
is second in dominance rank only to the cheek in a group of ten
the
while
millimeter;
111
is
tested,
grams per square
body parts
12
is
is
least
dominant,
only
which
at
the
grams
of
hand,
threshold
per square millimeter.
feand
male
for
the
in
area
thresholds
genital
Unfortunately,
thresholds
of
list
Von
determined.
Frey’s
been
seldom
have
male
(16) is based on a single subject. His more detailed observations (17),
however, indicate that there is virtually no pressure sense in the
and
warmth
of
the
pain,
perception
clitoris,
although
or
penis
glans
cold is well developed. It is quite possible that the punctate presthe
where
touch
with
genital area
correlate
does
threshold
not
sure
is concerned but that instead some other sense or combination of
senses is involved.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

249

Thresholds for the dorsum of the hand and the cheek obtained
by von Frey and other investigators indicate that the cheek is considerably more sensitive than the hand. These ﬁndings are in agreement with the thresholds obtained in this study. In a recent study
of electrical thresholds at various body sites Sigel (15) reported that
“leg areas including thigh and ankle, also dorsum of the hands and
the palm showed a deﬁnite tendency for higher thresholds. Scalp,
temple, forehead and face tended to have lower thresholds. The
anterior chest and upper arm and anterior wrist areas showed a
tendency for lower thresholds. Neck areas, abdomen and upper back
showed no deﬁnite trend.” In this statement there is no disagreement with the clinically observed order of dominance.
From the experimental results obtained here, it is proposed that
the dominance hierarchy elicited under the conditions of simultaneous testing may be explained on the basis of the relative strength
of the stimuli and the stimulus threshold.
SUMMARY

Using square wave electrical stimuli, the threshold for perception in the hands, cheeks and calves were determined in thirtyfour psychiatric patients. Simultaneous stimuli were applied in
random sequence to combinations of cheek and hand and both
cheeks, at threshold, suprathreshold and combinations of threshold
and suprathreshold intensities.
With simultaneous threshold, or simultaneous suprathreshold
stimulation, the differences between the number of extinctions in
either part were not signiﬁcant. With stimuli of unequal intensity
(one stimulus at threshold and one suprathreshold), however, there
was a signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the threshold
stimulus.
The total number of extinctions is greater with threshold than
with suprathreshold stimuli; and greater in heterologous than in
homologous patterns of stimulation.
It is concluded that the observed order of dominance in simultaneous cutaneous tests may be explained by psychophysical relationships.
REFERENCES
(1)

Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld,
1952.

(2)

111.:

Charles Thomas,

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M. 8c Green, M. A.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. é» Psychiat., 66:

855-362, 1951.

�KORIN—FINK

250
(3)

Bender, M. B.; Green, M. A. 8c Fink, M.: Patterns of Perceptual Organization
with Simultaneous Stimuli. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5" Psychiat., 72:233-255,
1954.

(4)

(5)

(5)
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)
(11)

Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of the Sensory Organization of the Human
Brain: A Study in Rostral Dominance as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation. 1. Nero. (5. Ment. Dis., 113:471-484, 1951.
Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the Human Brain:
II—A Study in Rostral Dominance in Children. Neurology, 1:119-122, 1951.
Critchley, M.: The Parietal Lobes. London: Edward Arnold 8c Co., 1953.
Critchley, M.: Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference
to Parietal Lesions. Brain, 72:538-561, 1949.
Denny-Brown, D.; Meyer, J. S. 8c Horenstein, S.: The Signiﬁcance of Perceptual Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion. Brain, 75:433-471, 1952.
Duncker, K.: Some Preliminary Experiments on the Mutual Inﬂuence of
Pains. Psychol. Forseh, 21:311-326, 1937.
Fink, M. Sc Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in
Normal Children. Neurology, 3:27-34, 1953.
Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8: Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile
Stimuli by Mentally Defective Subjects. ]. Nerv. 63'» Ment. Dis., 117:43-49,
1953.

(12) Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8: Bender, M. B.:

The Face-Hand Test

as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46—58, 1952.
(13) Hardy, J. D.; Wolf, H. S. 8: Goodell, H.: Studies on Pain. A New Method

for Measuring Pain Threshold: Observations on Spatial Summation of Pain.
1. Clin. Invest., 19:649-658, 1940.
(14) Linn, L.: Some Developmental Aspects of the Body Image. Int. ]. Psychoanal., 3621-7, 1955.
(15) Sigel, H.: Cutaneous Sensory Threshold Stimulation with High Frequency
Square-Wave Current: 11. The Relationship of Body Site and Skin Diseases
to the Sensory Threshold. ]. Invest. Derm., 18:447-451, 1952.
(15) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Physiologic des Schmerzsinns. Ber. Sdchs. Ges.
Wiss., 462185-196, 283-296, 1894.
(17) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Sinnesphysiologie der Haut. Ber. Siichs. Ges.
Wiss., 47:166-184, 1895.

�JOURNAL of the
HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

VOL.

VI, No. 4

l

.

l

OCTOBER, 1957'

*
.

.

CONTENTS

Papers» from the Department of Experimental Psychiatry
A UNIFIED THEORY: OF THE ACTION‘OF- PHXSIODYNAMIC- THERAPIEs—‘——Max

Fink

-

’

A

19.7

AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION .IN‘ PSYCHIATRIC,

INmRyIEws—Jbseph Iaﬂe

207‘

SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN
TA—RY

MENTAL HOSPITAL—Robert

and Max Fink

L

Kahn, Max Pollack

SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN
TO ELECTRosHOC'x—Martin

A. Green

A VOLUN-

EEG

.216

RESPONSE

229

ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION 0F SIMULTAN'EOUS‘
ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS STIMULI—Hy‘mqn

Max Fink

Korzn and
"241

‘

NEWS AND NOTES

--

"I

'

'

I

" "

——

——-——————_—.
V

,

,

V

Published quarterly for the Hillside HOspit-al, Glen Oaks,- N. Y., by
7

‘

251

'

THESOCIETY 0F HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
Copyﬁght_1957, The Society

OE

Hillside HOSpital, Inc.

v”

"V

'

�Hillside Hospital is a nonsectarlan, nonproﬁt mental hospital
for the treatment Of voluntary patlents sufferlng from early and
curable mental illne-SS; regardless o'E the1r ability to pay. A special
department for adolescents1's 1ncluded:1n the Hospital program. The
Hospital teaches and trains" phys1c1ans ‘;in‘ psychiatry and psychotherapy, and also prOVidEs graduate training to graduate students1n
psychology, social service and psych1atr1c nursing. Research programs are in progress in psychiatry, med1c1ne and1n the laboratories.
The teaching and training program carefully organized and
integrated with the clinical serv1ces and 1nvolves the participation of
the administrative staff, a staif of superv1sors and the cooperation
of a large psychiatric attendmg staff almost entirely psychoanalyti—
cally trained. In addition to all the usual inpatient adjunctive
therapies, the Hospital condiu‘cts anact’e extramural program
including an aftercare clinic, an outpat1et1c11n1c afﬁliation with
Adelphi College for the tralnmg'of’ psychologists, nurses and social
workers, an organization of formerpatients; lectures to the general
public, and a close afﬁliation with the LongIsland Jewish Hospital.
The Hospital traces itsbegmmngsto orgamzatlonal meetings in
1917 held under the sponsorsh1p of Dr Israel Strauss which led to
the formation of the Committee for Menta 'iI-Iealth among Jews, in
11919. Hillside Hospital was opened anddedlcated in 1927. Its
original location was in Hastings-on-Hudson, mQVing' to its present
location in 1941. It is an aﬂiliate of Federatlon oﬁ Jewish Philanthropies of New York, and has been growmg stead1lyin bed capacity,
the present size being 200 beds.

is

"

'

�JOUBNAL of the
HILLSIDE HGSPITAL
Published as a function of the Publications Committee of the Medical Board.
The Hospital is an agency of The Federation of Jewish Philanthropies
of New York.

VOL.

VI, No. 4

OCTOBER, 1957

Editorial Advisory Board
MORRIS B. BENDER,

M.D.

DUDLEY

SANDOR LORAND,

D. SHOENFELD, M.D.

MD.

Editor
SIDNEY TARACHOW,

MD.

Associate Editors
M.D.
JOSEPH S. A. MILLER, M.D.
ABRAHAM S. LENZNER, M.D.

M. DAVID EPSTEIN, M.D.
SYLVAN KEISER, M.D.

EMANUEL KLEIN,

Distributed by
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street, New York 11, N. Y.

�Information to Contributors
Manuscripts—Original manuscripts should be sent to Sidney Tarachow, M.D.,
123 East 80 Street, New York 21, N. Y. All parts of the manuscripts should
be typewritten, double-spaced, on one side of bond paper. References
should conform to the style of this Journal.
Reprints—Orders for reprints should be addressed to International Universities
Press, 227 West 13 Street, New York 11, N. Y.

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION, $3.00, SINGLE ISSUES, $1.00

Editorial communications should be addressed to Sidney Tarachow, M.D., Editor, Journal of the Hillside HosPital, 123 East 80 Street, New York 21, N. Y.
Business communications, remittances, subscriptions and advertising material
should be addressed to the Administrator’s Ofﬁce, Hillside Hospital,
Glen Oaks, N. Y.

�EDITORIAL NOTE
The Editors are happy to devote this issue to the work of one
of the Hillside Hospital research departments, the Department of
Experimental Psychiatry. While from time to time the pages of this
Journal have carried reports of the various research activities within
the Hospital, this is the ﬁrst time that an entire issue of the Journal
has been given over to presenting a comprehensive picture of the
activities of a single department. Future issues will carry reports of
our other research activities, in different spheres and carried on with
varying methodologies. In our next issue we expect to present a
large report on the many activities of the in-Hospital and attending
staffs in professional and public education. We turn this issue over
to the Department of Experimental Psychiatry. It is a young department, its workers are searching for scientiﬁc measurable factors in
psychiatry, and hope by their ﬁndings to contribute to the multidisciplinary approach in psychiatry.

195

�PREFACE
The reports in this issue of the Journal are representative of
studies now in progress in the Department of Experimental Psychiatry. The Department was established in September 1954 upon
the initiative of the late Dr. Israel Strauss. The goal of its full-time
research personnel was deﬁned as the study of psychologic and
physiologic aspects of behavior. In establishing the operational,
experimental principles of the Service we have leaned heavily on
our previous experiences with Drs. M. B. Bender and E. A. Weinstein at the Bellevue and Mount Sinai Hospitals of New York.
These studies are supported ﬁnancially by the Board of Direc.
tors of the Society of the Hillside Hospital. In 1954 the United
States Public Health Service, National Institute of Mental Health
established their support of the program, which has continued.
Funds have also been obtained from the Dazian and Kaufmann
Foundations, and recently from the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry.
The Staff has shown rapid growth, and at the present time
includes:

Martin A. Green, M.D.
Joseph Jaf‘fe, M.D.
Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. '
Hyman Korin, Ph.D.
Max Pollack, Ph.D.

Assistant in Neurophysiology
Assistant in Psychiatry
Senior Assistant in Psychology
Assistant in Psychology
Senior Assistant in Psychology

——

—-

—
—
—

Technical assistants include Mrs. Hannah Mosquera (EEG), Mrs.
Jean Kolodny (Psycholinguistics) and Mrs. Janet Bowie (Secretary).
During the past year Dr. Harold Esecover, Senior Resident in Psychiatry, has been associated with the Department on a half-time
basis.

October

10, 1957

Max Fink, M.D., Director
Department of Experimental Psychiatry
196

�A UNIFIED THEORY OF THE ACTION OF

PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES1
MAX FINK,

MD.2

The proper role of the physiodynamic therapies (convulsive,

insulin coma and lobotomy) in psychiatry remains poorly deﬁned.
In part, this results from the lack of an adequate formulation of
their mode of action. In the past six years increasing evidence for a
neurophysiologic-adaptive View of electroconvulsive therapy has
been presented (41, 32, 38, 1). This view ascribes the therapeutic
process in electroshock to a persistent alteration in cerebral function
which provides the milieu for a change in adaptation of the subject
to his environment. The type of adaptation evoked is dependent
upon the personality of the subject, the environmental situation,
and the duration of the induced alteration in cerebral function.
Concurrently, an awareness of a similar mode of action in insulin
coma (31) and lobotomy (40) has developed.
During the past four years we have studied the relation between
alteration in various indices of brain function and the behavioral
response of psychiatric patients to therapy. The neurophysiologicadaptive view of electroshock has been supported and ampliﬁed (1 l,
12, 13, 19, 21); evidence for a similar view of insulin coma has been
presented (22); and recently the concept has been extended to the
newer “tranquilizers” (9). These studies provide the basis for a
generalization concerning the efﬁcacy of these therapies. It is our
purpose in this report to examine the experimental evidence to
determine whether or not the mode of action of each of these thera1From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

Read at the 2nd International Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, September

6, 1957.

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service; and the Board of Directors’
Research Fund of the Society of the Hillside Hospital.
2Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
197

�MAX FINK

198

pies may result from their ability to induce sustained alteration in
cerebral function; and the corollary question, whether measurable
alteration in cerebral function is a necessary condition for the efﬁ—
cacy of these therapies, or a “complication” or “untoward effect.”
The indices of brain function used in these studies have varied.
These include memory scales (26), visual (20) and tactile (10) perceptual tasks, and changes in language patterns of orientation both
clinically (19‘) and after intravenous amobarbital (21). In electroencephalographic studies of this problem, changes in the delta index,
both in routine records (11, 12) and after activation by intravenous
thiopentone (32, 33), and in the beta index (16) have been applied
successfully. For this review, two indices will be stressed: changes in
the delta index of the unactivated EEG, and clinical neurologic
signs. These indices have been selected because of their successful
application in the analysis of the electroshock process, and because
data is available for each of the therapeutic modalities.
OBSERVATIONS

(a) E lectrosh ock

The following notes summarize our experimental studies of the

role of changes in EEG delta activity in the response of subjects to
electroshock (11, 13). In these studies, electroencephalograms were
obtained before treatment, and at weekly intervals on a day after a
treatment in consecutive electroshock referrals. Grand mal treatments were administered three times a week, for twelve to twenty
treatments. The EEG records were quantitatively analyzed for the
amount of induced delta activity, and classiﬁed into categories of
“high,” “moderate” and “low” degrees of delta activity. At the end
of treatment, the patients were independently rated for their shortterm clinical response into the categories of “much improved,”
“moderately improved” and “unimproved.”
In the initial series of patients, a signiﬁcant relationship between
the early induction of high degrees of delta activity, and clinical
ratings of “much improved” was observed. Eighty per cent of the
records in the much improved group were high degree delta by the
fourth to sixth treatment; and the percentage was sustained at 90
per cent in the third and fourth weeks. In contrast, none of the unimproved patients developed high degree delta records in the ﬁrst
three weeks, and only 20 per cent of the records in the fourth week
were so classiﬁed.
In a subsequent predictive study, the EEG records during the

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

199

second and third weeks of treatment were analyzed. Of the patients
who had high degree delta records on both occasions, 67 per cent
were rated as much improved, while of the patients without such
records, 70 per cent were in the unimproved and moderately improved categories.
Roth (32, 38), studying the EEG delta activity evoked by intravenous thiopentone after electroshock, has related both the stability
and the rate of remission of patients with endogenous depressions
to the peak value of the induced slow activity. He concluded that
patients not attaining a speciﬁed delta activity level “have not acquired an adequate physiological basis for recovery,” and recommended measurement of delta activity levels after thiopentone as a
guide to the clinical management of patients.
Further information is obtained from convulsive-subconvulsive
control studies. While convulsive electroshock induces degrees of
delta activity that vary from low to high, subconvulsive therapy
rarely alters EEG patterns or induces low degrees of delta activity
(13). In their comparative study of different convulsive and subconvulsive techniques, Ulett, Smith and Gleser (38) demonstrated a
signiﬁcantly greater recovery rate for the convulsive than the subconvulsive group.
In a similar study (13) recently completed here, twenty-seven
patients received a course of subconvulsive therapy. Electroencephalograms, taken at weekly intervals, demonstrated minimal
changes—none of the records were scored as middle or high delta
activity. Of the twenty-seven patients, no change in behavior was
noted in twenty-three, and of these, nineteen were referred for a
second course of treatment. Grand mal electroshock induced a high
degree of delta activity in fourteen. All patients in this group
showed signiﬁcant changes in behavior, while of the ﬁve who did
not show the delta response, only two showed a behavioral change.
(b) Tranquilizing Drugs

When the newer drug therapies are studied from the viewpoint
of their electroencephalographic and clinical neurologic effects, a
meaningful classiﬁcation emerges. Furthermore, a relationship between the degree and type of induced change in cerebral function
and therapeutic efﬁcacy may be noted. The ability of these agents
to induce such signs of central nervous system dysfunction as motor
rigidity, depression, excitement and seizures are well known. Less
well documented, however, are the clearly deﬁnable electroencephalographic patterns. Based on observations made in chronic admin-

�200

MAX FINK

istration of drugs in adult psychiatric patients, the EEG changes
may be classiﬁed according to predominant changes in the frequency
spectrum. There are three broad types:
1. Increased slow wave activity with hypersynchrony
(“bursts”)——“delta shift”
11. Desynchronization with voltage and frequency
irregularity and irregular theta activity—“desynchronization”
III. Increased high voltage fast activity—“beta shift.”
Of the group of drugs inducing a delta shift, the phenothiazine
derivatives chlorpromazine, promazine, and perphenazine are clear
examples. Each drug induces seizures in nonepileptics or exaggerates
seizures in epileptic patients (7, 8, 15, 29, 37). Each drug induces
clinical parkinsonian neurologic patterns when given in adequate
dosage. In our laboratories, we have induced parkinsonism in all
patients receiving chlorpromazine (14) and have observed seizures
in 10 per cent of a group of psychotic patients without previous
history of seizures. Induced delta activity, including burst activity,
was observed in more than half the patients in this series.
Reserpine also evokes delta activity when given in large doses
(2). At high dosage levels, it exaggerates seizures in epileptics and
induces seizures in animals (35). At the usual clinical dosages, however, reserpine induces desynchronization of frequencies with a
moderate increase in theta activity (28), without seizure induction
but with deﬁnite motor rigidities. In a series of patients treated here
(39), parkinsonism was induced in all patients. EEG changes were
limited to desynchronization only, without delta burst activity.
The primary response of two other drugs, mepazine and benactyzine, is the induction of EEG desynchronization. Mepazine, a phenothiazine derivative, induces desynchronization with small amounts
of theta activity (7). Delta activity has not been described, nor have
we found reports either of seizures or parkinsonism in the clinical
literature. Benactyzine, a potent anticholinergic compound, induces
a blocking of alpha, ﬂattening of the record and occasional theta
activity (5, 17). Neither seizures nor parkinsonism have been described for this agent.
Meprobamate is the clearest example of the group of drugs inducing a beta shift in the EEG (3). This agent further differs from
the phenothiazines and reserpine in not producing parkinsonism
and not only are clinical seizures not induced, but deﬁnite antiepileptic activity has been described (30). Habituation is readily

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

201

achieved, and withdrawal phenomena of agitation and seizures have
been observed (42). In these actions, meprobamate is more like
barbiturates than like the other new tranquilizers.
If we determine the clinical efficacy of these agents, we note a
parallel between the induced EEG effects and their potency in
altering behavior. The drugs that most readily induce a delta shift
in EEG frequencies—the phenothiazine compounds—are those with
the greatest clinical efﬁcacy in the therapy of psychoses. The compounds with lesser activity in this direction are less efﬁcacious clinically.

Insulin Coma Therapy
The effects of insulin coma therapy on the nervous system are
well documented. During each coma, EEG delta activity is induced,
which usually persists for minutes to a few hours after gavage. Not
infrequently, in approximately one third of patients receiving deep
coma therapy in this hospital, seizures, aphasia or prolonged coma
results. After such events, EEG changes of delta activity persist for
days, and in cases of prolonged coma, for weeks and months (43).
The relation between prolonged coma, altered brain function
and behavioral response has been discussed at length. Revitch (31)
reported eight cases of prolonged coma and concluded that improvement may be attributed to the induction of organic brain damage,
similar to lobotomy. Yaeger, Simon, Margolis and Burch (43), describing twelve cases of prolonged insulin coma, noted a correlation
between length of coma, degree of organic confusion, remission of
mental symptoms and degree of EEG abnormality. Shagass and
Rowsell (34), emphasizing EEG data, and Kwalwasser and Caplan
(27) presented individual cases to support the same conclusion.
We reported a similar relationship between prolonged coma and
behavioral response in a case study (22). A 34—year-old schizophrenic
patient with paranoid ideation developed a left hemiplegia during
insulin coma therapy. With the onset of neurologic signs of hemiparesis, hemianopsia, hemisensory syndrome and spatial inattention,
there was a marked change in speech and behavior. He became lucid,
loquacious and denied his illness. His former paranoid-withdrawal
type pattern was replaced by a friendly cooperative attitude. These
changes were accompanied by delta changes in the EEG, as well as
language changes after amobarbital indicative of altered brain
function. The neurologic symptoms resolved, but the behavioral
changes persisted so that he was discharged two months later as
“much improved.”
(c)

�202

MAX FINK

(d) Lobotomy
While we have not had the opportunity to study lobotomy

patients from the point of view of this summary, the reports of
numerous observers clearly document a similar relationship. EEG
changes of delta activity are present in all subjects postoperatively
(6) and persist for varying periods. Walter et a1. (40) in a study of
150 patients, found an 80 per cent persistence of abnormal EEG
activity after three years. These authors also noted a relation between clinical improvement and the degree and extent of postoperative Slow wave activity.
Postoperative seizures are a frequent “complication,” being variously reported as occurring in up to 20 per cent of subjects (25).
Furthermore, there is a relationship between the extent of brain
tissue cut and the therapeutic outcome. Circumscribed surgical
lesions, regardless of locus, have an improvement rate lower than
unilateral lobectomy; and these latter are frequently inadequate
and are “improved” upon by a bilateral procedure (36).
DISCUSSION

When the various physiodynamic therapies are essayed from the
point of View of an alteration in brain function, a common mode
of action becomes apparent. These therapies represent devices which
induce appreciable changes in brain function, with resultant change
in behavior. Convulsive therapy and lobotomy induce measurable
diffuse changes in brain function directly; insulin coma primarily
when complications ensue; and the phenothiazine and reserpine
groups of tranquilizers when given in adequate dosage.
How persistent changes in cerebral function affect behavior is
not clear. Psychotic behavior is not “reversed” or “obliterated.”
Rather, with an alteration in the central nervous system milieu,
there is an alteration in all aspects of behavior including perception,
mood, affect, memory, judgment and attitude. The speciﬁc adaptive
is
and
is
each
for
variable
dependent on numerous
subject
response
historical and environmental factors. Premorbid personality (18),
environmental situation and expectations (13), and the duration of
the alteration in brain function (12) have recently been discussed as
determinants of the behavioral response under these conditions.
The induced changes in behavior are evaluated by the psychiatrist, administrator or family as to the degree of “improvement.”
These ratings are value judgments, based upon such factors as the
tolerance
environmental
the
behavioral
of
induced
response,
type

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

203

and the observer’s expectations. In this context, the physiodynamic
therapies do not induce “improvement”-—rather they induce behavioral change which is secondarily evaluated as improvement.
The alteration of cerebral function is therefore not a “complication” or an “untoward effect” but the desired goal of these forms of
therapy. Of the many “organic" therapies introduced during the
past thirty years, none apparently has been a speciﬁc agent for the
therapy of psychoses (in the sense that penicillin is speciﬁc for neurosyphilis and nicotinic acid for pellagra dementia), but rather devices
with greater or lesser degrees of applicability and efﬁcacy in altering
behavior by altering the cerebral milieu.
In this context, the various physiodynamic therapies are not spe—
ciﬁc for a type of psychosis. The early enthusiasm that reserpine or
chlorpromazine was speciﬁc for schizophrenia, or hypotheses that
ascribe signiﬁcance to an antagonism between these drugs and “psychosis” or “schizophrenia” are not tenable. Similar enthusiasm
claiming a speciﬁcity of insulin coma for schizophrenia is also untenable, and support for this view is presented in a recent chlorpromazine-insulin coma control study (14).
EEG analysis of these therapies permits a more explicit deﬁnition of the induced alteration in brain function. Changes in cerebral
function reﬂected by a shift in the spectrum of EEG frequencies
toward the slower range, with a concomitant increase in voltage and
a periodicity described as “bursts” or “hypersynchrony” provide the
change in milieu that is more effective in altering behavior. The
signiﬁcance of the delta shift has been clearly demonstrated in
electroshock therapy; and can be inferred from the available data
in lobotomy, insulin coma, and the tranquilizers.
That a delta shift has some speciﬁcity is seen in the analyses of
the drug effects. Those drugs that induce the delta shift—the phenothiazines and reserpine—have been consistently reported as effective
modiﬁers of psychotic behavior. Changes in brain function reﬂected
by EEG desynchronization only, or a shift in frequency spectrum to
the faster range, have a limited efficacy in altering psychotic behavior.3 The signiﬁcance of a delta shift is further seen in the
limited efficacy of subconvulsive electroshock when compared to
convulsive electroshock in the management of psychoses.
Another aspect of the alteration in brain function which may be
deﬁned is the change in seizure threshold. With the delta shift in
These observations suggest the application of EEG screening of new chemotherapeutic compounds for therapeutic efficacy according to their ability to
induce delta burst activity with a minimum of side effects.
3

�MAX FINK

204

the EEG, an increase in clinical seizures would be anticipated. This
is indeed true. Seizures have been described following electroshock
(4, 24); they are prominent after lobotomy (40) and a common “complication” during and occasionally following insulin coma therapy
(23). With the tranquilizers, the parallel of clinical efﬁcacy and
seizure induction is most striking. Phenothiazine compounds induce
seizures commonly; reserpine rarely; benactyzine not at all; and
meprobamate is a potent anticonvulsant! The lowering of seizure
threshold parallels the extent of the EEG delta shift induced by
these compounds. Similar analyses can be made for the potentiation
of sedative action and induction of parkinsonism—both potent indices of an alteration in cerebral function.
The neurologic basis for the delta shift and increase in seizure
frequency is unclear. Whether this represents a persistent change in
function of some speciﬁc brain stem nuclear system, as the centrencephalic, thalamic or hypothalamic, is conjectural. From the wide
range of agents that can induce a delta shift, with or without hypersynchrony, it appears more likely that the EEG changes reﬂect an
alteration in the diffuse biochemical activity of the nervous system
rather than in a focal activity of speciﬁc cellular masses.
SUMMARY

The neurophysiologic and clinical neurologic aspects of convulsive therapy, “tranquilizers,” insulin coma and lobotomy, are
1.

reviewed.

The efﬁcacy of each therapy in the treatment of psychoses is
related to the ability to induce a persistent change in cerebral function, of which a delta shift in the EEG spectrum and an increase in
2.

incidence of seizures are two indices.
3. Alteration in cerebral function is an essential prerequisite of
behavioral change with each of these therapies. Such alteration is
neither a “complication,” nor an “untoward effect,” but is the sine
qua non of the mode of action of these therapies.
4. No evidence has been educed in these studies that the physiodynamic therapies are speciﬁc agents for the relief of psychoses; nor
do they affect a speciﬁc segment of the nervous system; nor do they
induce speciﬁc behavioral changes.
5. The therapeutic process of convulsive therapy, insulin coma,
lobotomy and tranquilizers may be ascribed to the induction of a
persistent alteration in cerebral function which provides the milieu
for a change in adaptation of the subject to his environment.

'

�THEORY OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES

205

REFERENCES

Aird, R. B.; Strait, L. A.; Pace, J. W.; Hernoff, M. K. 8c Bowditch, S. C.:
Neurophysiologic Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions. A.M.A. Arch.
Neural. (9 Psychiat., 75:371-378, 1956.
(2) Arellano, A. P. 8: Jeri, R.: The Effect of Reserpine on the Scalp and Basal
Electroencephalogram. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 8:150 (abst.), 1956.
(3) Berger, F. M.: The Chemistry and Mode of Action of Tranquilizing Drugs.
(1)

Arm. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 67:685-699, 1957.
(4) Blumenthal, I. J.: Spontaneous Seizures and Related Electroencephalographic
Findings Following Shock Therapy. J. Nerv. é» Ment. Dis., 122:581-588, 1955.
(5) Coady, A. 8: Jewesbury, E. C. 0.: A Clinical Trial of Benactyzine Hydrochloride (“Suavital”) as a Physical Relaxant. Brit. Med. J., Mar. 3, pp. 485487, 1956.
(5) Cohn, R.: EEG Study of Prefrontal Lobotomy. Arch. Neural. &amp; Psychiat.,
53:351-357, 1945.
(7) Denber, H. C. B.: Discussion, Symposium on the Psychopharmacologic
Approach to Schizophrenia. Second Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, 1957.
(8) Fabisch, W.; Effect of Chlorpromazine on the Electroencephalogram of
Epileptic Patients. J. Neurol., Neurasurg., (5» Psychiat., 20:185-190, 1957.
(9) Fink, M.: Therapy of Schizophrenia: Role of Alteration of Brain Function
in Behavior. Presented Second Int. Congress of Psychiatry, Zurich, 1957.
(10) Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8c Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
(11) Fink, M. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity Following Electroshock. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol, 8:158 (abst.), 1956.
(12) Fink, M. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta Activity to Behavioral
Response in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A. Arch. Neural.
(5» Psychiat., 78:516-525, 1957.
(13) Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L. 8: Green, M. A.: Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. J. Nerv. 6} Ment. Dis. (in press).
(14) Fink, M.; Shaw, R.; Gross, G. 8c Coleman, F. 8.: Comparative Study of
Chlorpromazine and Insulin Coma in the Therapy of Psychosis. J. Am.
Med. Assoc. (in press).
(15) Hankoﬁ', L. D.; Kaye, E.; Engelhardt, D. M. 8c Freedman, N.: Convulsions
&lt;16)

Complicating Ataractic Therapy, Their Incidence and Theoretical Implications. N. Y. State J. Med., 57:2967-2972, 1957.
Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman, I. C. 8c Pincus, G.: Changes in
Electroencephalogram and in Excretion of 17-Ketosteroids Accompanying
Electro-shock Therapy of Agitated Depression. Psychosom. Med., 8:246-251,
1946.

(17) Jacobson, E.: Suavitil, et Nyt Stof Med Speciﬁk Virkning pa Centralnervesystemet. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 117:1147-1151, 1955.
(18) Kahn, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neural. (in press).
(19) Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Changes in Languages During Electroshock Therapy. In: Psychopathology of Communication. New York: Grune 8c Stratton,
(in press), 1957.
(20) Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Perception of Embedded Figures After Induced
Altered Brain Function. Am. Psychol., 12:361 (abst.), 1957.
(21) Kahn, R. L.; Fink, M. Sc Weinstein, E. A.: Relation of Amobarbital Test to
Clinical Improvement in Electroshock. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5- Psychiat.,
76:23-29, 1956.
(22) Kahn, R. L.; Graubert, D.

Fink, M.: Delusional Reduplication of Parts
of the Body After Insulin Coma Therapy. This Journal, 4 :134-148, 1955.
8:

�MAX FINK

206

(23) Kalinowsky, L. B. 8: Hoch, P.: Shock

Treatment, Psychosurgery and Other
Somatic Treatments in Psychiatry. New York: Grune 8c Stratton, 1952.
(24) Karliner, W.: Epileptic States Following Electroshock Therapy. This
Journal, 5:258-263, 1956.
(25) Klotz, M.: Incidence of Seizures, with EEG Findings, in Prefrontal Lobotomy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 65- Psychiat., 742144-148, 1955.
(26) Korin, H.; Fink, M. 8: Kwalwasser, S.: Relation of Changes in Memory and
Learning to Improvement in Electroshock. Conf. Neurol., 16:88-96, 1956.
(27) Kwalwasser, S. 8c Caplan, M.: A Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma: Treatment. This Journal, 1:145-155, 1952.
(28) Liberson, W. T.: Effect of “Tranquilizing” Drugs on EEG. EEG Clin.
Neurophysiol., 8:523, 1956.
(29) Liddell, D. W. 8c Retterstol, N.: The Occurrence of Epileptic Fits in Leucotomized Patients Receiving Chlorpromazine Therapy. J. Neurol., Neuro(30)
(31)
(32)

(33)

(34)

(35)

surg., (g. Psychiat., 20:105-107, 1957.
Perlstein, M. A.: Miltown, Its Use in Convulsive and Related Disorders.
]. Am. Med. Assoc., 161:1040, 1956.
Revitch, E.: Observations on Organic Brain Damage and Clinical Improvement Following Protracted Insulin Coma. Psychiat. Quart., 28:79-92, 1954.
Roth, M.: Changes in the EEG Under Barbiturate Anesthesia Produced by
Electro—Convulsive Treatment and Their Signiﬁcance for the Theory of
ECT Action. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 3:261-280, 1951.
Roth, M.; Kay, D. W. K.; Shaw, J. 8c Green, 1.: Prognosis and Pentothal
Induced Electroencephalographic Changes in Electro-Convulsive Treatment.
EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:225-238, 1957.
Shagass, C. St Rowsell, P. W.: Serial Electroencephalographic and Clinical
Studies in a Case of Prolonged Insulin Coma. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 65Psychiat., 72:705-711, 1954.
Sigg, E. B. 8c Schneider, J. A.: Mechanisms Involved in the Interaction of
Various Central Stimulants and Reserpine. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:

419-426, 1957.
(35) Simon, A.; Margolis, L. H.; Adams, J. E. 8c Bowman, K. M.: Unilateral and
Bilateral Lobotomy: A Controlled Evaluation. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (‘5'
Psychiat., 66:494-503, 1951.
(37) Stewart, L. F.: Chlorpromazine: Use to Activate Electroencephalographic
Seizure Patterns. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 9:427-440, 1957.
(38) Ulett, G. A.; Smith, K. 8c Gleser, G. C.: Evaluation of Convulsive and Subconvulsive Shock Therapies Utilizing a Control Group. Am. ]. Psychiat.,
112:795-802, 1956.
(39) Wachspress, M.: Blumberg, A. G.; Fink, M. 8: Miller, J. S. A.: Evaluation of
High—Dose Reserpine Therapy for Relief of Anxiety. This Journal, 5 :67-77,
1956.

(40) Walter, R. D.; Yaeger, C. L.; Margolis, L. H.

Simon, A.: The EEG Changes
in Unilateral and Bilateral Frontal Lobotomy. Am. J. Psychiat., 111:5908c

594, 1955.

(41) Weinstein, E. A. 8: Kahn, R. L.: Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Springﬁeld, Ill.: C. C. Thomas, 1955.
(42) Wikler, A.: Personal Communication.
(43) Yaeger, C. L.; Simon, A.; Margolis, L. H. 8: Burch, N. R.: Electroencephalographic Studies in Posthypoglycemic Coma. ]. New. 6’ Ment. Dis., 118:
435-441, 1953.

�AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION
IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS1
JOSEPH JAFFE,

The clinical interview

MD.2

is the psychiatrist’s

primary tool for
diagnosis of psychopathology, the modiﬁcation of behavior, and
collection of research data. Only in recent years, however, have
actual transactions which comprise the interview been studied

the
the
the
ob-

jectively.
Investigators of the interview have usually employed systems of
content analysis (1), which are based upon various theories of psychodynamics. Currently, there is increasing emphasis upon formal
aspects of interaction such as temporal patterns of speech (14),
drastic change of subject (3), physiological relationships of the participants (2), grammatical patterns of language (5, 6, 9), and speech
disturbances and silences (10). These aspects, in contrast to content
categories, are relatively independent of theoretical preconceptions,
and are more readily quantiﬁed and studied statistically.
In many investigations of these formal variables, however, the
patient’s communications are abstracted from the total context of
the interview. These approaches neglect the fact that the psychiatrist is a participant observer, i.e., a signiﬁcant variable in the interaction (ll). Others have attempted to control this variable by means
of structured interviews in which the doctor’s contribution is
standardized according to a predetermined experimental design (6,
7, 14). These structured situations delete the very quality of living
relationship that is the ultimate concern of the psychotherapist (7).
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

Read at the New York Divisional Meeting, A.P.A. November, 1957.
Supported by Grant 56-151 of the Foundations’ Fund for Research in Psychiatry.
2Assistant in Psychiatry, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital.
207

�208

JOSEPH JAFFE

We are in need of methods of verbal interaction analysis that
neither preclude nor prescribe the doctor’s clinical responses.
The purpose of this paper is to present a method of interview
analysis which (a) is objective and quantitative, (b) preserves the
natural patient-therapist relationship, and (c) treats the interview
as an integrated system of interpersonal communication. This is accomplished by including the doctor’s usual clinical behavior in the
data to be studied. The raw material is not the patient’s speech, but
rather the total verbal output of the “two person” or “dyadic”
group (8).
METHOD

The tape-recorded interview

transcribed, without
regard to the speaker of the words. Careful attention is given to
subtle repetitions such as “I—I mean,” “Well as—as I say,” and to
(i
i,
such
“so
as “you know,”
to speak,
interpolated expressions
as I
said,” etc. These have a tendency not to be heard since they are
irrelevant to the content.
The transcript is then arbitrarily divided into consecutive units
of 100, 50 or 25 words, depending on the discreteness of the phenomena to be investigated. Thus a unit contains contributions of
words from either doctor or patient alone, or from both in varying
proportions.
The measurement applied to these units of dyadic speech is the
type-token-ratio (TTR). This is an index of the balance between
repetition and variety of words (12). The TTR is the ratio of the
number of diﬂerent words (types), to the total number of words
(tokens), in a sample of language. For example, in a lOO-word sample the repetition of the identical word 100 times in succession
would produce the lowest possible ratio of .01 (1 type/ 100 tokens).
The highest possible ratio of 1.0 would result if every one of the
100 successive words were different (100 types/ 100 tokens). These
extremes of stereotypy and diversity are rarely encountered, and
then only in grossly pathological situations (8).
The “word-type,” i.e., the numerator of the TTR, is arbitrarily
deﬁned. All words are different which are pronounced or spelled
differently. Thus, give, gives, gave, given and giving are considered different types, as are know and no. Vocalizations not
clearly identiﬁable as words are omitted, with the major exception
of “mmhmm” which is a frequent utterance of the interviewer in
our records. Contractions are retained as single words, but vulgarisms such as “I dunno” are edited to read “I don’t know.”
is precisely

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

209

The TTR

is calculated for each unit and the pattern of consecutive scores is graphically plotted, as illustrated in Figures 1 and
2. For additional precision, the units may be overlapped; e.g., 50word units may be advanced 25 words at a time, so that each unit
is composed of the last half of the preceding and the ﬁrst half of the

subsequent unit. This often smoothes the resultant curve. The overlapping technique is illustrated in Figure 3.
Previous studies of the TTR have dealt with the over-all average in a single person’s language (12). The present method studies
the sequential pattern in dyadic language.
OBSERVATIONS

In the last eighteen months approximately sixty recorded interviews have been investigated by this method. The material includes
forty patients in all diagnostic categories. The dyadic TTR patterns
have been found to be sensitive to a variety of clinical phenomena
(8). This report illustrates the changes in language interaction
occurring during the course of hospitalization and therapy, as well
as changes in rapport and defensive operations within individual
interviews.

TTR Pattern in Clinical Change
Figure 1 shows the pattern of the ﬁrst 1500 words of three separate interviews during the clinical course of one patient. The doctor
(a) Dyadic

DYADIC TTR PATTERN WITH CLINICAL CHANGE
(CONSECUTIVE

PRE-TREATMENT

T53
I.

25

WORD

UNITS)

POST-TREATMENT# I2

0N DISCHARGE

.92

.84
.76

M

M

.68

."-'

—

‘

.60

I

lo

20 30

40

UNIT NUMBER

5060

I

I0

20 30 40
UNIT NUMBER

FIGURE

1

5060

I

I0

20

30 4O 50 60

UNIT NUMBER

#40
#49
#59
I957

�210

JOSEPH JAFFE

in each. This case was selected as an unequivocal example of gross clinical change. In the ﬁrst interview the patient was
agitated and depressed. She refused to be seated and paced about
the room, reiterating stereotyped self-recriminations, crying hysterically, with marked pressure of speech. At the time of the second
interview, following a course of grand mal electroshock, the clinical
picture was grossly altered. She was less agitated and more cooperative, although withdrawn and complaining of a memory deﬁcit. On
discharge two months later, she appeared alert, poised, conversational and, at times, surprisingly insightful. She had been rated
is the same

clinically as “recovered.”
The TTR of consecutive 25-word units of interaction, for each
of the three periods described, is graphically represented in Figure 1.
Consecutive points are connected by lines so that the ﬂuctuations in
the graph reﬂect the difference between successive scores. The mean
TTR for the complete interview from which these samples were
taken is represented by a horizontal line through each graph. The
pattern of scores demonstrates a ﬂuctuating equilibrium about the
mean.
'
The interviews at these three successive stages show a sequence
of changes. The mean level of the interaction is seen to increase as
the clinical status changes from psychosis to “recovery.” There is a
concomitant restriction in the amplitude of the pattern, i.e., a decrease in variation about the mean.
Comment: The sequence of change in the TTR pattern parallels
the progressive improvement in interpersonal communication that
was apparent clinically. This suggests an approach to the quantiﬁcation of clinical change, deﬁned as an altered pattern of verbal interaction in the interview.
(b) Changes in Communication Within the Interview

Figure 2 is an enlargement of the ﬁrst of the three interactions
shown in Figure 1. Here the sequence of changes within a single
interview is examined rather than comparing the patterns of
successive interviews. As described before, the patient was speaking
continuously in a disorganized affective outburst. The lower line
indicates the 25-Word units in which the interviewer participated.
Following the doctor’s introductory remarks, units 3-12 represent
the patient’s uninterrupted speech. Wide oscillations of the pattern
are prominent. From samples 13 onwards the doctor made repeated
efforts to communicate with the patient. Two independent judges
reviewed the transcribed protocol, and both identiﬁed three areas

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

211

in which there seemed to be an understandable, rational interchange
between the participants. These periods are labeled “rapport” in
the upper line. During these three periods the oscillations of the
pattern are much constricted. Compare other nonrapport periods
such as 23-24 and 39—41, in which the doctor’s participation ampliﬁed the oscillations.
DYADIC TTR PATTERN
(CONSECUTIVE 25 WORD UNITS)

——

'RAPPORT"

TTR

36
DOCTOR'S
PARTICIPATION
l

5

l0

IS

3035 4045

20

25
UNIT NUMBER
FIGURE

2

50

#40
I957

Comment: This illustrates a method of quantifying interpersonal
phenomena, such as the degree of “contact” with a severely disturbed patient. The affective pattern in this patient represents the
psychotic integration, and for this reason, the occasional occurrences of conventional, rational conversation are described as periods of “rapport.” The restriction in the amplitude which characterizes these periods is similar to the over-all pattern at the time
of “recovery.”
Complete Interview
Figure 3 demonstrates the initial dyadic TTR analysis of a complete interview. This interview is the discharge evaluation of a
patient who had been hospitalized following a bizarre suicide at(c) Analysis of a

�JOSEPH JAFFE

212

tempt. After seven months of hospitalization, she had “improved”
clinically. This took the form of a hypomanic mood and a gross
denial of her severe emotional conﬂicts. The interview is scored by
the method of successive 50-word units advancing by 25-word steps.
The mean TTR for the interview is shown by the horizontal line
drawn through the graph. The pattern falls into several natural
segments. There are two areas in which ten consecutive points fall
below the mean (areas 4 and 7). These are unusual in this interDYADIC TTR ANALYSIS
TTR

OFA PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW

(OVERLAPPING so woao UNITS)

.98

.94
.90

:3:

::2 I.I—'i—'.I—'Ij==
.70

.r. III

-.

v.

255-

-/1-’1

I

II

~

JUL—I- ---.r

I

4I—I—I—I----I----—I——-—I-—I—|*I—---|—I—I
I

3

4

7

5

9

8

l0

II

I2

it 54

|957

FIGURE 3

There are also areas of gross deviation from the mean (such as
area 2). Thus we allow the objective pattern to determine our
criteria for phenomena to be studied. In general, we look for per-

View.

sistent changes in the TTR level, gross trends or sudden shifts.
Several of the deviant areas are described to illustrate the
method. The interview begins with a hypomanic monologue in
which the patient describes her successful visit home, her euphoric
outlook and plans for a rosy future.
Area 2 has been delineated because of gross deviation from the
mean. The beginning of this period coincides with a change of topic
to her plans for going back to her job two days hence. Her optimism is’interrupted by a period of confusion as she tries, with some
difﬁculty, to recall one of the details of the job. The end of the gross
ﬂuctuation coincides with the rationalization “I don’t think I’ll
have too much trouble.”
‘

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS
213
Area 4 was delineated as one of the two sections in which
ten
consecutive scores fall below the mean. Its beginning coincides
with
a statement about her depression on admission to the
hospital. This
area ends with the lowest score of the interview, which
precedes by
only a few words a spontaneous reference to her suicide
attempt.
This large deviation at the end of area 4 embodies the
main characteristics of the following area.
Area 5 is characterized by large ﬂuctuations above and below
the
mean. The content of this area is completely on the theme of suicide.
She attempts to prove how much she
now wants to live. The doctor’s
queries at the end of the period meet with increasing resistance. In
the beginning of the next segment (area 6) she
stubbornly refuses to
discuss the subject of suicide further, at which
point she changes the
subject abruptly.
Area 7 was delineated on the basis of two criteria. It
begins with
a precipitous drop in the TTR, followed by ten consecutive
scores
below the mean, and ends with an equally
abrupt rise. Its beginning
coincides with a change of subject by the doctor in the
form of a
question about her feelings at that moment in the interview. This
content area, i.e., the “you-me” relationship, is pursued
at a very
repetitive level. The period ends when she abruptly changes the

Area 9 is delineated because of an extremely low
score enclosed
by two large deviations. It coincides with a brief
mention of a
meeting with a young man who told her how well she looked. It
ends with an embarrassed r'emark and her
statement “I decided to
get him off the topic.”
These examples illustrate areas of disturbance or
disequilibrium
in the verbal interaction pattern. In
contrast, 3, 6, 8 and 10 are areas
of relative stability or equilibrium in the record.
These periods are
marked by a different quality of communication.
They consist either
of a euphoric, hypomanic monologue which avoids all
stressful subjects, or of evasion of the doctor’s probing questions by
superﬁcial
rationalization and conventional cliches.
Comment: Recent reports of objective interview studies
using
other techniques (10) have noted that the interaction
goes through
a series of deﬁnable phases, which may correspond to
periods of
stressful disorganization and successful defense
respectively. The
phases demonstrated here, and the events that delineate them,
suggest an analogous formulation. The content areas that disturbed the
pattern in this ﬁnal interview also did so on the initial interview
seven months earlier. We anticipate that the discussion of
a subject

�214

JOSEPH JAFFE

that had resulted in disequilibrium, but now no longer does so,
may constitute an operational deﬁnition of “resolution of an area
of conﬂict.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Diverse and highly personal interpretations of interview data
limit the growth of psychiatry as a science. Systematic study of the
actual transactions may lead to operational deﬁnitions of hitherto
subjective phenomena. For example, it is likely that the patterns of
verbal diversiﬁcation presented here constitute part of the subliminal cues to which therapists respond when making clinical judgments of anxiety, affect, etc.
Objective investigations of the interview must encompass the
behavior of both participants since the events observed are interpersonal processes. Gill, Newman and Redlich (4) deﬁne even the
initial interview as the “diagnostic evaluation of an interpersonal
relationship.” Ruesch (13) has recently stated that “observations
made in social situations do not have the characteristics of a scientiﬁc procedure in which one aspect is studied in detail while all
other variables are held constant.”
The method presented here is an attempt to convert these concepts into practical research methodology. It permits a quantitative
statement of various clinical phenomena occurring either within
single interviews or in the course of therapy. Disturbances of verbal
interaction are deﬁned operationally in terms of the conﬁguration
of the TTR pattern. Applications to the deﬁnition of clinical change
and transactions within the interview have been presented.
The TTR is only one of many quantiﬁable aspects of dyadic
speech. Pace of interaction, time reference, and relative amounts of
participation by doctor and patient are also being measured. Further
applications of these techniques are under investigation.
REFERENCES

(l) Auld, F. 8c Murray, E. J.: Content-Analysis Studies of Psychotherapy. Psychol.
Bull., 52:377-395, 1955.
(2) Coleman, R.; Greenblatt, M. 8: Solomon, H. C.: Physiological Evidence of
Rapport During Psychotherapeutic Interviews. Dis. New. System, 17:2-8,
1956.

H.; Hamburg, D. A.; Inwood, E. R.; Salzman, L.; Meyersburg,
H. A. 8c Goodrich, G.: A Procedure for the Systematic Analysis of Psychotherapeutic Interviews. Psychiatry, 17:337-345, 1954.
(4) Gill, M.; Newman, R. 8c Redlich, F. C.: The Initial Interview in Psychiatric
Practice. New York: International Universities Press, 1954.

(3)

Eldred,

S.

�COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS
(5)

215

Goldman-Eisler, F.: A Study of Individual Differences and of Interaction in
the Behavior of Some Aspects of Language in Interviews. ]. Ment. Sci.,

100:177-197, 1954.
(6) Gottschalk, L. A.; Gleser, G. C. 8c Hambidge, G.: Verbal Behavior Analysis.
A.M.A. Arch. Neural. 63'» Psychiat., 77:300-311, 1957.
(7) Grinker, R. R.; Sabshin, M.; Hamburg, D. A.; Board, F. A.; Basowitz, H.;
Korchin, S. J.; Persky, H. 8c Chevalier, J. A.; The Use of an AnxietyProducing Interview and Its Meaning to the Subject. A.M.A. Arch. Neural. (5*
Psychiat., 77:406-419, 1957.
(3) Jaffe, 1.: Language of the Dyad: A Method of Interaction Analysis in
(9)

(10)
(11)

(12)
(13)
(14)

Psychiatric Interviews. Psychiatry (in press).
Lorenz, M. 8c Cobb, 8.: Language Patterns in Psychotic and Psychoneurotic
Subjects. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (5. Psychiat., 72:665-673, 1954.
Mahl, G. F.: Disturbances and Silences in the Patient’s Speech in Psychotherapy. ]. Abn. é» Soc. Psychol., 53:1-15, 1956.
Mandler, G. 8c Kaplan, W. K.: Subjective Evaluation and Re-enforcing
Effect of a Verbal Stimulus. Science, 124:582-583, 1956.
Mowrer, O. H.; Verbal Behavior in Psychotherapy. In: Psychotherapy:
Theory and Research, ed. 0. H. Mowrer. New York: Ronald Press, 1953.
Ruesch, 1.: Disturbed Communication. New York: W. W. Norton, 1957.
Saslow, G.; Matarozzo, J. D. 8: Guze, S. B.: The Stability of Interaction
Chronograph Patterns in Psychiatric Interviews. J. Consult. Psychol., 19:

417-430, 1955.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF
THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL
HOSPITAL1
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,2 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between
inci—
and
with
to
disorder
class
and
type
social
respect
psychiatric
dence of mental illness (3, 5, 6, 13, 14), selection and maintenance of
treatment (2, 6, 15), and therapeutic outcome (10). The present
in
of
selection
the
in
factors
social
therapy
is
with
concerned
study
a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich, and their coworkers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of New Haven was divided
into ﬁve social classes on the basis of weighted criteria of education,
under
who
residents
the
Of
were
residence.
of
and
place
occupation
freclasses
social
more
were
the
from
those
upper
psychiatric care,
quently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or
custodial care was more common among the lower classes. Of the
the
restricted
two
to
was
entirely
psychoanalysis
psychotherapies,
of
the
determinant
the
class
Social
was
predominant
upper groups.
held
conthe
when
was
diagnosis
selected
even
of
treatment
type
is
that
“.
found
it
follows:
results
.
.
as
their
summarize
stant. They
determedical
and
psychological
does
on
not
depend
treatment
well.
the
of
as
the
patient
status
but
position
minants alone,
on
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high
1

Glen
Hillside
Hospital,
of
Psychiatry,
Experimental
the
From
Department

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. S.
Public Health Service.
2Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital.
3Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
4Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
216

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

217

degree to the upper social levels. The data of this study would seem
to indicate that most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where
the background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist” (15).
It is possible to relate the results obtained from these community studies to such selective factors as the patient's ﬁnancial resources or the extent and type of treatment facilities available. A
more critical test of the importance of social factors affecting choice
of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients.
This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital. It is a nonproﬁt,
nonsectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental symptoms” (4), who are admitted regardless of their ability to pay. One of the main criteria for accepting patients is their ”ability to participate proﬁtably in psychotherapy.” Individual psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with organic therapies
available when needed. The average length of hospital stay is six
months, although some patients remain for as long as a year.
The present investigation is an outgrowth of several years of
study of electroshock therapy. In previous work it has been shown
that certain aspects of personality were signiﬁcantly related to patient selection and therapeutic efﬁcacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
electroshock patients differ from those receiving other forms of
treatment in regard to cultural background, including such factors
as education and place of birth, and personality as measured by the
California F scale (1); secondly, whether these factors were also
related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.
METHOD

Population: The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside
Hospital as of March 7, 1957 was studied. This constituted a total
of 172 patients, ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a mean of 34.6,
and including 58 men and 114 women.
Procedure: (1) The population was subdivided into three groups
according to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy,
(b) insulin coma therapy, and (c) psychotherapy only.5
5All patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data were included
in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

218

(2)

birth.

The groups were compared for age, education and place of

(3) All

patients were tested6 with a ten-item modiﬁcation of the
California F scale suggested by Levinson (9). The F scale is a questionnaire (see Appendix) which has been related to such factors as
authoritarianism, acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
The patient reads ten statements and indicates whether he agrees
or disagrees with each statement and to What extent. The score given
for each item ranges from one to seven and the total score range is
10 to 70. The greater the agreement the higher the score obtained.
The statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.
(4)

The population was subdivided in regard to utilization of

certain adjunctive services in the hospital. Among such services
available are group activities, occupational therapy, psychological
testing and creative therapy. The latter is a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a series of controlled painting procedures
which are considered to be analogies of life experience (18). Psycho—
logical testing and creative therapy were selected for this study because both require a speciﬁc referral from the therapist.
RESULTS

The data were analyzed as follows:

comparison of the treatment groups for age, education, F scale scores, and place of birth;
(2) comparison where diagnosis is held constant; (3) signiﬁcance of
length of hospitalization prior to treatment; and (4) comparison
between groups referred for adjunctive hospital services.
(1)

Comparison of Treatment Groups
For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard
deviations for the F scale scores, age and years of schooling are
presented in Table l. The EST group had higher F scores, was
older and had fewer years of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These diﬁerences were statistically
signiﬁcant for F score and age but failed to reach statistical signiﬁcance for education. The failure of years of education to differentiate the groups was due, in part, to the fact that the electroshock
1.

6As part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F
scale prior to treatment. In the case of‘ those patients who were actually on EST
on March 7 their pretreatment scores were used in the statistical comparison
since it had been found that EST signiﬁcantly affects the score during treatment.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

219

-

.550

ammvaom

§3«

50m

$.32

o

ammuuoh

mo

REE

55

:Eduamo

ﬁwmouom

onesm

.ummm.50m

$32

Aﬁoozw

ﬁvwwvm

£me

50m

-0332

«a

ﬁvgvmm

$592

ﬁaéww

:25

83m

mo

.Esnamo

8m:

35

-Gwmuuom

Son

$52

$55“

ﬁmwvvv

$392

$82

“Staggm

088

.vm

GMV

@8va

How

mo
.Ssﬂamo

658%
98on

H
53H.

h

mBOBm

J/

SK

$2; $5:

ﬁx:

l/i

If!!!

3320

6M

Gm

«0
28&gt; 582

EwEuuﬁh

3 3

g

NM

2: 2:

OS

"~on

.qu

:53

9:

«E

MN

S

2

:33.

1&amp;3

fill!!!

“59$th

Qm

q:

3

3;

n:

3w

mum

u

w?

um&lt;

x0

:82

Gav:

£5 .2:

3w

a

3%...“

3

:oﬂkﬁﬁcu

Gm

92

3;

2:

::.m

m2.

:32 E2

28m

h

582

3%

ﬁne:

2m

we”.

a5

3

3:

mm

mo.

8.

32
So.

3 a a
so:

8%

385:me

285:? 385:3

t

1

.onoxmmézsmcu

£35me

339%
@380

532:

-onuwmm

Saga

-935-.me

38%

3&amp;2:

1:.

�220

KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

group contained many foreign-born patients whose education was
difﬁcult to evaluate accurately. When treatment groups were subdivided into number of patients above and below eight years of
education, the difference was signiﬁcant at the .01 level. The insulin and psychotherapy groups did not differ statistically for any

of these factors.
Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign-born
patients than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group
being highest of all. Among the foreign-born patients, those who
came from Eastern European countries received somatic therapy
predominantly, while the majority of those from Western Europe
received psychotherapy alone.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis
The diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are com—
parable to those reported in previous studies of the hospital popution (12). Of the 172 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as
psychotic depression, 32 as psychoneurosis and 2 with other diagnoses. As expected, a larger proportion of the depressed patients
(52%) received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.
To control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the
psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those who received electroshock and those who were given psychotherapy alone.
The results are shown in Table 2.
While the two groups were comparable for age and education,
the electroshock patients had a much higher mean F score, a difference signiﬁcant at the .02 level of conﬁdence. It is also demonstrated
that a signiﬁcantly higher proportion of the electroshock patients
were born in Eastern Europe.
2.

Comparison of Electroshock Patients According to Length of
Hospitalization Prior to Treatment
While the electroshock patients, as a group, have been shown to
differ from those receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there were still
considerable intragroup differences. To account for some of these
differences it was postulated that the same factors involved in selection of treatment were also related to the readiness with which a
given patient was referred for electroshock. While most of the patients who received EST were placed on treatment less than three
months after admission, about 40 per cent were referred after a
period of three to twelve months. In Table 3 the patients are compared according to the period of hospitalization prior to electro3.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.830

ax”:

$.va

vacuum

133$

$2;

ﬁhm

“225355

«0

583m

ainamo

83m

«so
.033

50m

$32

@5th

$.ng

@8va

Z

”REE

208

23$th

a;

how

«0
comumuswm

Envy.
Mano

Sign“

waoﬁum

N

ﬁg;

@E:

23

.vm

HEM—NH

=32»:qu

Qm

3

can:

3:

mo
$3on

3
2:

GNU:

a

$5

a5

86

a

mg

umucxuaﬁm

Gm

mi

«NH

3.2;

vm&lt;
582

3:“

Gm

32

3*

Que:

mg

£5

ﬁtubum

kc

a

ﬂ:

*Nwm

88m

goutumwﬁcu

h

532

3*

non

5N0:

Em:

a5

8d
me.

a

as
3%

285:?

-oﬁwmmémm

-oauwmm

322:

382:

Ha
a.

221

�KAHN—POLLACK——FINK

222

ﬁé

.850

N

a

o
.83

5.85

$me
mo

583m

@888

uneasm

8

8me

H

o

m

«Eu

EuEEush

-0332

3

58m

$88 $85

$8:

2 5

2

ﬁg

$89

$83

mm

a

:

BER

988

How

we
tetanacﬁﬁwem

8.8
H

8098sz

any?

«Eu

183
wBBom

x0

$2:

a

m

m
SMEVN

6mm

559

3

Qm

E

:82

3

«o
928%

3

ca

5.:

8.8

8

88

:2

8.8

:82 .85

cm:

Sn

a;

fill!!!

Mﬁﬁkouuvx

Gm

8.2

25.36%

98

8.2

a

:4

:88

gm

:82 .85

83.

$4:

8...:

a

8.8

:8.“

:2

%&lt;
8.8

582

8%

:3

Ram

88
Qm

Q:

w:

mm;

38m

:oﬂtiﬁcu

BE :52

:8

rm :32

Sim
-mNzﬂmmmom

“cued—88H.

622.:

aa

dawned

.88

:05

8.8

a;

9

mo

E«

$va

.88

m m

.85

$8
288

EMS“

2c

m
52:

o

3

:82

88
who:

8

$04

a;

2.2

8

288

.88

8

8

m

8. S.
8.

m
52:

80A

.89:

5::

988

885.85 88:88.,”

Gmﬂu

.888

c
8

m

UHOE

.888
a.“

I

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

223

shock. Patients who had higher F scores and
were older were treated
earlier than the younger and lower F scale
groups. Place of birth is
also a signiﬁcant factor. While 44
per cent of those treated within
three months were foreign-born, all patients referred after
a period
of six months were born in the U. S. The data
on education just
fails of signiﬁcance, although 28
per cent of those treated earlier
had less than eight years of education.
4. Use of Adjunctz've

Hospital Sewices
Comparison of the patients referred for creative therapy and
psychological testing is shown in Table 4. It is clear that those referred for either of these procedures had signiﬁcantly lower F
scores,
were younger in age, had more education and more were nativeborn than patients who were not referred for these services.
DISCUSSION

The results indicate that the factors of education, age,
place of
birth, and F scale score were signiﬁcantly related to the
type of
therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive services in this
hospital. Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for those
patients who were younger, better educated, native-born and had
lower
F scores. Such patients were also referred
more frequently for the
auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores, were
older, poorly educated and foreign-born, particularly in Eastern
Europe, were most likely to be referred for EST. These
patients
were infrequently referred for psychological tests or for creative
therapy. Furthermore, these relationships were still signiﬁcant when
diagnosis was held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of
Hollingshead,
Redlich, and their co-workers (3, 5, 6, l3, 15) who demonstrated that
social factors are related to the type of
therapy received in a community. The present study demonstrates that such factors are also
signiﬁcant in a hospital setting where ability to
pay is not a criterion
of therapeutic selection and where all forms of
therapy are equally
available to the entire population.
With ﬁnancial aspects and the availability of therapeutic facilities eliminated in accounting for the relation of social
factors to the
selection of treatment, two alternative interpretations
be conmay
sidered. The social factors may relate directly to the
empirically
established criteria for choice of therapy. On this basis
a patient is

�KAHN—POLLACK—FIN K

224

550

.35an

«REE

$5;

$5.:

@2va

$5:

153$

$3:

Axwwvwa

$.8va

@583

$.me

@me

$3

5me

«0

532%.“

vacasm

ﬁw:

ﬁvﬁvmw

H

awwuamu

«Eu

82m
323.5

-0332

3:3

1E3

Eom

a
wumtuh
EOE

$38

kg

How

«0

N

£038st

*Nmenamo

man“;

~e£m£o£uaam

«Eu

.
33:5

ARR“:

waoﬁum

ﬁéw

ﬁévﬁ

u8
w.
8.9.5wa

it’ll;

.wm

539

if}

3.

m.»

Qm

a.»

a

8N

***h.w

mm:

mo
28&gt;

2:

3:

:82

wﬁ

w:

:82

a5

A:

AWN

233::va

.8“
Qm

2:

3:

«.2

:82

EN

3m

Sun

«.2

a

mg

:52 .Em

***©N.m

fwawowé

om&lt;
wmtukum

0.“.

ﬁoa

Scwtek
it$©m6

Gm

kc

2:

QB

inomﬁ

H

as 2:

:32 :32

28m

h

:82

982

3w

5.3

soy

32V

3.»

iv

55

m.w

mg:

A5

s.

so.

a a a

23.23%:80

O&gt;UNQHU

mo.

:52

Esme? 385:?

$3389

385:?

Aonuwmm

3:80

.rH.U
03330

322?

3225

Oz

Jonowmm

.Hoaowmm

and.

oz

-Hd

OZ

*
oZ

i

I;

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

225

referred for electroshock because he is older,
poorly educated or
foreign-born, clinical experience having shown that such
persons
respond best to this type of treatment. This explanation is inadequate since half the patients with psychotic depression received
psychotherapy alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice for this illness.
An alternative interpretation is that social factors
are related to
choice of treatment because they also affect certain
psychological
patterns of behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy,
such as mode of communication. Thus, a
patient is not referred for
electroshock because he is foreign-born or
poorly educated, but
rather these factors provide the difference in cultural
background
between patient and therapist which makes successful
communication less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Robinson
et al.
(15), in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have
pointed out that
psychotherapy is most likely to take place where the cultural background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist. Conversely,
patient-therapist differences in systems of value and communication
may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. In the
present study, similarly, the patients who received psychotherapy
alone were more like the therapists with
regard to the factors
studied.7
Apart from the problem of patient-therapist differences, certain
patterns of communication exhibited by the patient may be intrinsically incompatible with the establishment of conventional
psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have shown that
verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy and use of cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8). Such
language patterns appear to be more frequent in
persons with
poorer sociocultural backgrounds.
Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect
on com—
munication patterns, may also determine the manifest
symptomatology. Opler (11) has noted that, among patients diagnosed
as
schizophrenic, differences in symptoms are related to differences in
cultural background. Frank et al. (2), studying psychoneurotic
patients, reported that patients whose symptoms were
expressed in
somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while
those
who remained had ideational symptoms. In a
study of personality
The

therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9. Sixteen
per cent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education was
7

20.

18

over

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

226

factors in electroshock patients (8) we have noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and communication were more likely to be
associated with the development of a depressive psychosis. The relationship between communication pattern and symptoms indicates
that symptoms themselves are a mode of communication.
The F scale furnishes a quantiﬁable index of attitude and communication patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a
mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers
were less receptive to entering a psychotherapeutic relationship and
were more likely to receive electroshock. Tougas (17), using an
ethnocentric scale similar to the F scale, found that psychotherapy
was more effective in patients with low scores. In the present study
the F scale was the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment groups.
These results have clinical as well as theoretical signiﬁcance.
lowthat
indicate
in
from
observations
study
a
progress
Preliminary
scorers on the F scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that
those with high F scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone.
Another clinical application may be in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient. This may be done by
minimizing their social differences, by matching them more closely
for age and place of birth. Of possible greater importance is the
necessity for developing new modes of communication when treating
conventional
psychotherapeutic apwho
to
refractory
are
patients
proaches.
While epidemiological studies have clearly structured some of the
indicated
have
and
of
selection
in
involved
treatment,
problems
the direction of further study, it still remains for more processoriented research to provide deﬁnitive answers.
/

SUMMARY

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which all forms of
and
of
birth,
education,
place
available,
age,
were
equally
therapy
score on the California F scale were signiﬁcantly related to the type
of therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive hospital
1.

services.

Patients who were older, poorly educated, had higher F scores
and were foreign-born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most
likely to be referred for electroshock. Psychotherapy was the treat2.

�held constant.
4. Among the electroshock
patients the same factors found to be
signiﬁcant in choice of therapy were also
related to the readiness
with which a patient was referred for
electroshock.
5. It is postulated that
treatment selection is the result of the
communicative interaction between patient and
therapist.
Social
factors may be important in so far
as they are related to different
modes of communication.
APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM
Below are a number of statements. For
each statement we want
you to give us your personal opinion of whether
disyou
or
agree
agree. Answer each statement accordi
ng to one of the following:
I AGREE A LITTLE
I DISAGREE A LITTLE
I AGREE PRETTY MUCH I DISAGREE
PRETTY
MUCH
I AGREE VERY MUCH
I DISAGREE VERY MUCH
I. No sane, normal, decent
close friend or relation.
2. Science has its place, but
there are many important
things
that must always be beyond human
understanding.
3. If people would talk less
and wor k more, everybody would be

better off.

pe and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals
ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.
8. The best teacher or boss is
the one wh 0 tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to
go about it.
9. Young people sometimes
up they ought to get over them and settle down

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

228

weak
the
classes:
distinct
into
divided
two
be
10. People can
and the strong.
REFERENCES
8c Sanford, R. N.:
D.
Levinson,
J.
E.;
Frenkel-Brunswik,
(1) Adorno, T. W.;
8: Brothers, 1950.
York:
New
Harper
The Authoritarian Personality.
St: Stone, A. R.:
E.
H.
S.
Nash,
D.;
L.
Imber,
H.;
(2) Frank, J. D.; Gliedman,
(33»
77:
Neurol.
Arch.
Psychiat.,
A.M.A.
Leave
Psychotherapy.
Why Patients

283-299, 1957.
(3) Freedman, L. Z.

8c

Hollingshead, A. B.: Neurosis and Social Class. Am. ].

Psychiat, [13:769-775,

(4)
(5)

(5)

(7)

(8)
(9)
(10)

(11)
(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)
(16)
(17)

(18)

1957.

Hillside Hospital: 29th Annual Report, 1956.
8c Redlich, F. C.: Schizophrenia and Social Structure.
A.
B.
Hollingshead,
Am. ]. Psychiat., 110:695-701, 1954.
Disorders.
Class
and
Social
Psychiatric
8:
C.:
F.
A.
B.
Redlich,
Hollingshead,
Disand
Psychiatric
Environment
Social
the
Between
In: Interrelations
orders. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, pp. 195-208, 1954.
Kahn, R. L. 8c Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
8c J. Zubin. New York:
P.
Hoch
ed.
Communication,
In: Psychopathology of
Grune 8c Stratton, 1957.
to
Behavioral
in
8c
Response
Factors
M.:
Personality
L.
Fink,
R.
Kahn,
Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neurol. (in press).
Levinson, D. J.: Personal Communication.
8c Johnson, N. A.: Failures in Psychiatry: The Chronic HosC.
N.
Morgan,
1957.
113:824-830,
Am.
Patient.
].
Psychiat,
pital
197:103—110,
American,
Scientiﬁc
Culture.
and
K.:
M.
Schizophrenia
Opler,
1957.

8: Rachlin, L.:
A.
Lurie,
M.;
Gurvitz,
G.
S.;
Goldman,
Rachlin, H. L.;
1950.
in
Hillside
from
Hospital
317
Patients
Discharged
of
Follow-up Study
This Journal, 5:17-40, 1956.
Redlich, F. C.; Hollingshead, A. B.; Roberts, B. H.; Robinson, H. A.;
Disorders.
and
8:
Social
K.:
Structure
Psychiatric
Z.
L.
J.
Meyers,
Freedman,
Am. J. Psychiat., 109:729-734, 1953.
Rennie, T. A. C.; Srole, L.; Opler, M. K. 8: Langner, T. 8.: Urban Life and
Mental Health. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:831-837, 1957.
Robinson, H. A.; Redlich, F. C. 8c Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Treatment. Am. ]. Orthopsychiat., 242307-316, 1954.
Titus, H. E. 8: Hollander, E. P.: The California F Scale in Psychological
Research: 1950-1955. Psychol. Bull., 54:47-64, 1957.
In:
Verbal
in
Factor
Therapy.
Ethnocentrism
as
Limiting
a
R.:
R.
Tougas,
8c R. F. Dymond.
C.
ed.
R.
Rogers
and
Change,
Personality
Psychotherapy
1954.
196-214,
Press,
of
Chicago
pp.
University
Chicago:
Creative
of
Utilization
8c
and
E.:
Therapeutic
Structure
E.
Zierer,
Zierer,
Activity. Am. ]. Psychother., 10:481-519, 1956.

�SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY
IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK1
MARTIN A. GREEN,

MD.2

The assumption is often tacitly made in studies of nervous system function that the capacity for neurophysiological change is
similar for animals or humans in the groups under study. Differ-

ences in response are ascribed to different parameters of the stimulus
or to differences in the location and extent of lesions, either spontaneous or experimentally produced. Such an assumption may not
be warranted, however. Perhaps another factor in the variability of
response under these conditions is an individual variability in
neurophysiological reactivity or responsiveness. The initial “base
line” may not be similar in all individuals.
The possibility of different inherent patterns of reactivity has
been suggested by the studies of the alterations in the EEG during
electroshock. We have been impressed by the high degree of variability in such alterations both in their quantitative and qualitative
aspects. Although this variability has been described by previous
investigators, it has not been stressed sufﬁciently; nor have possible
explanations been advanced or systematically investigated.
The present report concerns a description of the changes in the

EEG during electroshock in the Hillside Hospital material. The
concept of neurophysiological reactivity is presented and studies
that may clarify this problem are suggested.
MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients who received electroshock for psychiatric
illness were studied. The patients were voluntary admissions to
1From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.

2Assistant in Neurophysiology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
229

�230

MARTIN A. GREEN

Hillside Hospital and the majority had not received electroshock
previously. The diagnostic groups included psychotic depression,
manic-depressive psychosis and schizophrenia. The largest group
was patients with depression. Ages ranged from 20 to 68 years with
a median of 47 years.
Treatments were given three times weekly, each patient receiving at least twelve treatments. The Medcraft instrument (alternating current) was used for twenty-eight patients and the Reiter instrument (unidirectional current) for sixty-one patients. Electro—
encephalograms were taken prior to, at weekly intervals during, and
two weeks following the course of treatment. Patients Whose pretreatment EEG was abnormal were speciﬁcally excluded from study.
Tracings were done on a nontreatment day (from 24 to 36 hours
following the previous treatment) with an eight channel Medcraft
machine using needle electrodes. Frontal, motor, parietal, occipital,
anterior temporal, posterior temporal, vertex and earlobe placements were employed with scalp to scalp and scalp to earlobe
combinations.
RESULTS

Delta Activity
A. Quantitative Diﬁerences: The delta activity was analyzed according to the method described by Fink and Kahn (7). The duration of burst activity, the lowest frequency, the average delta index
in several leads, the highest amplitude, and the highest per cent
time delta in one lead were measured. Records were classiﬁed as
showing a low, middle or high degree of delta activity (Fig. 1) according to criteria previously described (7).
All patients developed delta activity during the course of twelve
treatments, but differences in the amount of the slow activity and
its rate of development were very apparent (Table I). Some patients
developed “high delta activity” early in treatment, whereas other
patients showed only “low” or “middle” changes even after twelve
treatments. These latter patients were followed further with serial
EEGs. As treatment was continued, a high degree of delta activity
did not develop in some of these patients until twenty or more
treatments, or until treatments were given on a daily basis. They
were resistant to neurophysiologic change. This individual variability in EEG response was independent of the type of electroshock
current employed, being present both with alternating and with
unidirectional current applications.
1.

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

231

WWW
WWW
WWW’VW’WW
WWW
WWW
WWW
"WWW WWW-«MW
WWW
WWW
LF-LO

RF-RO

.,,

LC-LMT
RC-RMT

RP-E

LAT-LPT

WWWWWWWVW

”W
ISECOND

RAT-RPT

PRE- ELECTROSHOCK

FIGURE

la

24 HOURS AFTER EST

150 W

4%:

l2

Degree of Delta Activity—Low
From Fink and Kahn (7)

Qualitative Diﬂerences: Although the total amount of delta
activity may be similar, records differ as to type, frequency and
voltage of delta activity. One prominent qualitative difference is the
ratio of irregular delta activity to bursts of slow activity. Nearly all
B.

W
WW

LF‘ LO

WWWMWMWW

LC-LMT

R C -R MT

L

P-E

RmANWMMW-E
LAT- LPT

'

WNW/“WWW

WWW/MW
Ison

"WWW
WWW

WWIMMMMMMWNVWMMWWMMMMMHM

£59932.

RAT-RPT

PRE-ELECTROSHOCK

FIGURE 1b

24 HOURS AFTER EST #10

Degree of Delta Activity—Middle
From Fink and Kuhn (7)

�MARTIN A. GREEN

W
W
W mm
232

LWW WWW
«WWW
- L MT

T

ELEM“ Mwmwwaw

MR

LP'E

RP-E

”WWW

“H”

WWW

lSECOND

RAT- RPT'

PRE-ELECTROSHOCK

24

FIGURE 1c

{5,on

HOURS AFTER EST =11:”

Degree of Delta Activity—High
From Fink and Kuhn (7)

records show burst activity during a course of twelve treatments. In
some patients the initial delta change is in the form of bursts
which become more frequent, slower and of higher voltage as treatments are continued. The irregular delta activity in such records is
much less prominent and usually occurs at faster frequencies. In
other patients the reverse occurs. Delta activity appears chieﬂy in an
irregular and scattered form. Although burst activity is also present,
it is not conspicuous. In a third group of patients the amounts of
irregular delta activity and bursts are approximately equal (Fig. 2).
These differences in the form that the delta activity assumes
are usually constant during the course of treatment. At times,
TABLE

I

Degree of Delta Activity in Serial Electroencephalograms
during Electroshock
(2-4 records were taken for each patient)

No. of Records in Each Treatment Period
EEG Activity
No change
Low delta activity
Middle delta activity
High delta activity

EST 1-3

4-6

7-9

10-12

5

l

1

37

0

21

7

20
28

22
45

10
25

16
3
1

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

233

however, burst activity will become more prominent than the
irregular delta only during the latter part of the course of treatment; or burst activity which appears prominent early in treatment
may be overshadowed and obscured in later records by a large
amount of continuous irregular delta activity.

WWWW
A

HH

I486

WWW
AT‘VERTEX

R

5

HH

F-VERTEX

1392

WWWNWWVWWW
R

WWWWWWWWW
‘3

HH

l599

AWWWWWWWMMMMWNWWW
D

HH

50

mv.

I572

|____
SEC.
l

FIGURE 2

Qualitative Changes in Delta Activity
A—Irregular Delta
C—Rhythmic Runs
B—Delta Bursts

D—Asymmetry

The slow activity is maximal at the anterior temporal and
frontal electrodes and less pronounced at the more posterior electrodes. Often it is asymmetric, being of higher voltage, slower, and
in greater amounts at the left anterior temporal and frontal
electrodes as compared to the right (Fig. 2). Only
rarely is the
reverse true, i.e., accentuation on the right side. This
asymmetry
occurs during treatment both with alternating and with unidirectional currents.
Another type of abnormality is the appearance of rhythmic
runs
of delta activity which may continue for 10 to 20 seconds
(Fig. 2).

�MARTIN A. GREEN

234

The regularity of the frequency and voltage of the slow waves in
these runs is very striking. These runs are usually infrequent, but
may be the most prominent alteration in the record.
In many records the amount of delta activity ﬂuctuates during
the tracing. At times, some portions of a record may appear nearly
normal, while in other parts of the same record the delta activity
may be quite pronounced. This variation is independent of the
electrode combinations employed.

or Spike-Wave Activity
A large number of records show single spike activity of low,
moderate or high voltage. Most often such spikes are slower and
not as prominent as those present in patients with seizure disorders.
A small number of records show spike—wave activity. This is usually
at irregular, mixed frequencies and, again, does not resemble the
regular rhythmic bursts commonly seen in patients with seizure
disorders (Fig. 3).
2. Spike

3. A lpha

Activity
The alpha activity shows changes both in amount and frequency.
As the amount of delta activity increases the amount of alpha activity usually decreases. Changes in frequency occur but are not proHH

A
F

I40!

a

~wvv~uu~vv*1qJJWV’V‘r
0

W

“H

3‘

WWW

AT-VERTEX

TO EARLOBES

AT

VERTEX

'5“

P-EARLOB

”PT
50

mv.|
I

SEC.

FIGURE 3

Spike and Spike-wave Activity

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

235

nounced. The frequency will be slowed by 1-2
cps but at times will
remain the same as in the preelectroshock
tracing. In a small number of patients the amount and voltage of
alpha activity increases
during treatment. This change persists during the
posttreatment
period after the slow-wave activity subsides (Fig. 4).
F-O

HHI484

L
R

WW
PRE-EST

HH

|597

WWW’WWWWWMMWWWWMAMWMWW
L
F-O
2

wxs. POST-EST
FIGURE 4

50

mv.|_
l

SEC.

Change in Alpha Activity

Beta Activity
The fact that many sedatives, particularly
barbiturates,
induce
fast activity in the EEG and the
difﬁculty in controlling the administration of these drugs in the population studied
makes it difﬁcult
to evaluate changes during the course of
treatment. In most instances changes in fast activity are minimal.
The most frequent
change, when present, is a decrease in the activity.
4.

DISCUSSION

The problem being raised is that of the individual
variability
in the type and degree of EEG alteration
during electroshock

therapy. AS described, this is manifested in: (1) the
amount of slowwave activity and its rate of development; (2)
qualitative
differences
in the slow-wave activity (amount of burst
activity vs. irregular
delta activity, symmetry, ﬂuctuating
appearance of slow activity,
runs of rhythmic Slow activity); (3) presence of Spike
or spike-wave
activity; and (4) changes in alpha and beta activity.
Previous investigations (2, 4, 5, 10, ll, l2, l4, 17,
18, 19, 20, 25)
have stressed possible correlations with
age, sex, frequency of treatment, type of current employed, psychiatric diagnosis,
and clinical

�236

MARTIN A. GREEN

change. Increasing the frequency of treatment, for example, will
increase the degree of alteration in the EEG. However, when patients of similar sex, age and psychiatric diagnosis are given treatments at the same frequency with the same type of electroshock
current, variability in the rate of development of changes in the
EEG and their type and degree are still very prominent.
One explanation for this variability might be the distribution
of the electroshock current in the brain. Perhaps minor differences
in the resistance of the skull, in the distribution of blood vessels
and their permeability or in the arrangement of nerve tracts create
differences in the pathways taken by the current. Under such circumstances, different portions of the brain may receive more or less
current in one patient as compared to another. Differences in the
type of electrical activity generated by these variously affected areas
might account for variability in the EEG.
Available studies employing direct intracerebral measurements
indicate considerable diffusion of current throughout the brain (6,
9, 16, 21). However, a concentration of current anteriorly and along
large neuronal pathways, such as the corpus callosum, has been
demonstrated. No further information is available as to amounts
of current received by more speciﬁc cerebral areas.
Due to the high resistance of the skull only a small portion of
the applied current actually reaches the brain. The amount of
current entering different portions of the brain is said to be determined by the resistance of the skull overlying these areas, the anterior concentration of current being the result‘of the thinness of
the temporal bone with its consequent lower resistance as compared
to other parts of the skull (9, 21).
Several considerations, however, indicate that individual differences in these factors of resistance and amount of current reaching
different areas of the brain are of minor, if any, importance in the
EEG response during electroshock. It is the occurrence of the generalized seizure per se, rather than the passage of electricity, which
is the primary factor. During a course of grand mal therapy induced
by nonelectrical means such as metrazol, EEG changes occur which
are similar, in general, to those seen with electroshock (13, 14).
Diffuse slow-wave activity, accentuated anteriorly, and spike or
spike-wave activity are described. The amount of slow-wave activity
increases during treatment'but shows individual variability unrelated to the number of treatments. Another observation is that
electroshock therapy which induces petit mal (8, 18) or focal (3)
seizures rather than grand mal does not produce the characteristic

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT
237
build-up of slow-wave activity. In addition, there is no increase in
the degree of delta activity in our patients in whom
mal

grand
therapy is given with high suprathreshold stimuli as compared to
those in whom threshold stimuli are used.
Factors of current cannot be entirely dismissed, however.
Even
with grand mal therapy, the type of current
employed may inﬂuence the EEG change. We have conﬁrmed a previous
study (20)
showing that the rate of increase of delta activity is slower in
therapy with unidirectional current than in that with
alternating
current. Similarly, brief stimulus therapy is said to produce smaller
degrees of alteration in the EEG as compared to alternating
current
therapy (15).
The other theory to be considered in explaining the
variability
in EEG responsiveness, and the one which is
probably more decisive,
involves inherent differences in neurophysiological
reactivity. By
this is meant both the quantitative and
qualitative aspects of the
inherent capacity of the nervous system to respond to stimuli
or
injury. Not only the degree of response, but also the
type of response, may have these determinants. The type and degree of EEG
abnormalities developed during electroshock therapy
to be
appear
the reﬂection of such inherent individual differences in
neurophysiological reactivity.
Several types of investigation may serve to test this
hypothesis.
Methods other than electroshock known to produce EEG
alterations
could be applied prior to treatment. These might include
lowering
the blood sugar by parenteral insulin, intravenous administration
of
convulsants such as metrazol or Megimide, photic
stimulation, or
the intravenous administration of drugs such as barbiturate.
In addition, perhaps the actual electroshock seizure threshold or the
pattern
or severity of the seizures may be a measure of nervous
system responsiveness. Data from such investigations could be correlated
with the degree and types of EEG change during electroshock.
In
this manner it might be possible to demonstrate different
patterns
of neurophysiological reactivity and to classify individuals
accord-

ingly.
Such studies may not only help in understanding the
variability
in the EEG alterations during electroshock but would have
wider
application to other problems in clinical electroencephalography
and neurology. For example, the basis for the development of
spontaneous seizures secondary to traumatic, vascular, or
neoplastic
lesions of the nervous system is not known. Patients with lesions

�238

MARTIN A. GREEN

comparable in type, size and location may or may not develop
seizures. As previously described, some subjects show spike or spikewave activity during electroshock. This suggests an inherent difference in the capacity to develop clinical seizures or EEG seizure
activity following “injury” to the nervous system, whether the injury
is spontaneous or induced. Differences in this capacity may be
reﬂected in varying patterns of neurophysiological reactivity.
Differences in neurophysiological reactivity may also be manifested in the pretreatment EEG. Patients in whom the pretreatment
record is abnormal (ll), “instabile” (22), or shows a predominant
alpha rhythm (5) are said to develop the greatest alteration in the
EEG during electroshock. Other investigators have not conﬁrmed
these observations (2, 23). Actually, such correlations depend on the
method of analysis of the pretreatment record employed and the
criteria used for “abnormality.” Further investigation of this relationship is necessary.
Suggesting that neurophysiological reactivity is an inherent
process does not imply that a physiological basis does not exist or
cannot be investigated. This may reside in the central nervous
system itself, consisting of individual differences in neurochemical
systems or in the permeability of cells or blood vessels; or it may be
outside the nervous system. Individual differences in hormonal or
other humoral substances produced during the stress of electroshock
may serve to “sensitize” or “desensitize” the cerebrum with regard
to developing different amounts and types of electrical activity.
That such factors may be operative is suggested by the following
studies. Trypan red injected intraperitoneally in cats before a course
of electroshock decreased the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and reduced the degree of EEG changes as compared to control
animals (1). Atropine and scopolamine administered during a
course of electroshock in man blocked the development of the usual
slow-wave activity (24).
Electroshock therapy affords an excellent opportunity for the
experimental investigation of the problem of an inherent neurophysiological reactivity. One is able to apply studies directly to man
rather than animals. The stimulus to the central nervous system can
be standardized and the degree of neurophysiological change controlled, within limits, by changing different parameters. Tests of
EEG responsivity can be given before such changes are induced as
well as during and after treatment. Restudy of patients is often
possible when subsequent courses of treatment are necessary.
I

‘

�INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG UPON ECT

239

SUMMARY

Individual differences, both quantitative and qualitative, in
the EEG changes during a course of electroshock
treatment in
eighty-nine patients are described.
2. These differences are pronounced and
are not explainable
by age, sex, type of shock current, frequency of treatment,
psychiatric diagnosis, or clinical change.
3. An inherent capacity for
neurophysiological change that has
both quantitative and qualitative aspects may be the
primary determinant of these differences.
4. Variation in skull resistance and in the
amount of current
reaching the brain appear to be minor factors.
5. Investigations that might serve to
test the hypothesis presented are described. Such studies may lead eventually to a classification of individuals as to different patterns of
neurophysiological
reactivity and clarify other problems in clinical neurology and
electroencephalography.
1.

REFERENCES
Aird, R. B.; Strait, L. A.; Pace, J. W.; Hrenoff, M. K. 8: Bowditch, S. C.:
Current Pathway and Neurophysiological Effects of Electrically Induced
Convulsions. J. Nerv. (‘5' Ment. Dis., 123:505-512, 1956.
(2) Bagchi, B. K.; Howell, R. W. 8: Schmale, H. T.: The
Electroencephalographic and Clinical Effects of Electrically Induced Convulsions in the
Treatment of Mental Disorders. Am. ]. Psychiat, 102:49-61, 1945.
(3) Bergman, P. S.; Impastato, D. J.; Berg, S. 8c Feinstein, R.:
Electroencephalographic Changes Following Electrically Induced Focal Seizures. Conf.
Neurol., 13:271-277, 1953.
(4) Callaway, E. 8c Boucher, F.: Slow Wave Phenomena in
Intensive Electroshock. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2:157-162, 1950.
(5) Chusid, J. G. 8c Pacella, B. L.: The
Electroencephalogram in Electric Shock
Therapies. ]. Nerv. €7- Ment. Dis., 116:95-107, 1952.
(6) Delgado, J. M. R.; Alexander, L..&amp; Hamlin, H.: Effects
of Electroshock on
the Cortical and Intracerebral Electroactivity of the Brain in
Schizophrenic
Patients. Conf. Neurol., 13:287-294, 1953.
(7) Fink, M. Sc Kahn, R. L.: Relation of EEG Delta
Activity to Behavioral Re»
spouse in Electroshock: Quantitative Serial Studies. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (‘3‘Psychiat., 78:516—525, 1957.
(8) Fink, M.; Kahn, R. L. 8c Green, M. A.:
Experimental Studies of the Electroshock Process. J. Nerv. &amp;- Ment. Dis. (in
press).
(9) Hayes, K. J.: The Current Path in Electric Convulsion
Shock. Arch. Neurol.
é} Psychiat., 63:102-109, 1950.
(10) Hoagland, H.; Malamud, W.; Kaufman, I. C. 8c
Pincus, 0.: Changes in the
Electroencephalogram and in the Excretion of 17-Ketosteroids
AccompanyElectroshock
ing
Therapy of Agitated Depression. Psychosom. Med., 8:246251, 1946.
(1)

�MARTIN A. GREEN

240

Willner, M. D.: Signiﬁcance of Changes in the Electroencephalogram Which Results from Shock Therapy. Am. ]. Psychiat., 105:

(11) Kennard, M. A. 8:

40-45, 1948.

'

(12) Klotz, M.: Serial Changes Due to Electrotherapy. Dis. Nerv. Sys., 16:120-122,
1955.
(13) Knott, G. R.; Gottlieb, J. S.; Leet, H. H. 8c Hadley, H. D., Jr.: Changes in
the Electroencephalogram Following Metrazol Shock Therapy: A Quantitative
Study. Arch. Neural. (5" Psychiat., 50:529-534, 1943.
(14) Levy, N. A.; Serota, H. M. Sc Grinker, R. R.: Disturbance in Brain Function

Following Convulsive Shock Therapy. Arch. Neurol.
1027, 1942.

(‘5'

Psychiatu 47:1009-

(15) Liberson, W. T.: Current Evaluation of Electric Convulsive Therapy. Res.
Publ. Ass. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 31:199-231, 1951.
(16) Lorimer, F. M.: Sega], M. M. Sc Stein, S. A.: Path of Current Distribution
in Brain During Electroconvulsive Therapy. EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1:
343-348, 1949.
(17) Moriarity, J. D. 8c Siemens, J. C.: Electroencephalographic Study of Electric
Shock Therapy. Arch. Neurol. é» Psychiat., 57:712—718, 1947.
(18) Pacella, B. L.; Barrera, S. W. 8c Kali'nowsky, L.: Variations in the Electro-

encephalogram Associated with Electric Shock Therapy of Patients with Mental Disorders. Arch. Neural. E} Psychiat., 47 :367-384, 1942.
(19) Proctor, L. D. 8c Goodwin, J. E.: Clinical and Electra-physiological Observations Following Electroshock. Am. J. Psychiat., 101 :707-800, 1945.
(20) Proctor, L. D. 8: Goodwin, J. E.: Comparative Electroencephalographic
Observations Following Electroshock Therapy Using Raw 60 Cycle Alternating and Unidirectional Fluctuating Current. Am. ]. Psychiat., 99:525530, 1943.

Wegener, C. F .: On Electric Convulsive Therapy with Particular Regard to a Parietal Application of Electrodes Controlled by Intracerebral Voltage Measurements. Acta Psychiat. et Neural, 19:529-549, 1944.
(22) Sulzbach, W.; Tillotson, K. J.; Guillemin, V., Jr. 8: Sutherland, G. F.: A
Consideration of Some Experience with Electric Shock Treatment in Mental
Diseases, with Special Regard to Various Psychosomatic Phenomena and to
Certain Electra-technical Factors. Am. J. Psychiat., 99:519-524, 1943.
(23) Taylor, R. M. Sc Pacella, B. L.: The Signiﬁcance of Abnormal Electroencephalograms Prior to Electroconvulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. (S; Ment. Dis.,

(21) Smith, J. W.

8c

107:220—227, 1948.

-

Johnson, M. W.: Effect of Atropine and Scopolamine Upon
Electroencephalographic Changes Induced by Electro-convulsive Therapy.

(24) Ulett, G. A.

8c

EEG. Clin. Neurophysiol, 9:217-224, 1957.
(25) Weil, A. A. 8c Brinegar, W. C.: Electroencephalographic Studies Following
Electric Shock Therapy. Arch. Neural. é" Psychiat., 57 2719-729, 1947.

�ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL
CUTANEOUS STIMULI1
HYMAN KORIN, PH.D.2

and

MAX FINK, M.D.3

In the course of extensive investigations (1, 2, 3) into the perception of multiple simultaneous stimuli, the pattern of failure of
subjects accurately to report one of two stimuli led to a concept of
an “order of dominance” in cutaneous perception. Since then, the
relationship of the observed pattern of dominance to biologic and
psychiatric concepts of body image and body scheme has been the
subject of considerable speculation (4, 7, 8, 14).
The interrelationship of body areas was initially clearly demonstrated in simultaneous tactile tests of face and hand (2), in which it
was noted that the stimuli to the hand were frequently not reported
or mislocalized. These phenomena of “extinction” and “displacement” led to the inference that cheek area stimuli were “dominant”
to hand stimuli. In subsequent reports (3, 10, ll, 12) a pattern of
dominance for tactile stimuli was described in which the face and
the primary genital areas were the most perceptive or dominant
areas; the hand was the least dominant; and the shoulder, foot,
buttock, breast, back, thigh and abdomen fell between these extremes in a mild gradient. These observations were made in normal
adults and children and psychiatric patients, but were most clearly
discerned in patients with brain disease. Indeed, the major portion
of the data relates to a group of patients with severe diffuse brain
dysfunction under observation in a general psychiatric hospital.
1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service.
2Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside

Hospital.
3 Director,
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
241

�242

KORIN—FINK

The basis for these phenomena

is unclear.

In a review of the

problem (3) consideration was given to hypotheses ascribing signiﬁcance to anatomic, psychophysical, genetic, environmental and neurophysiologic factors. In their conclusions, Bender, Green and Fink
note that “no one theory adequately explains the organization of
this pattern. Learning and maturation are probably factors, but it
appears to be mostly inherent.” In studies of patients with brain
disease and normal young children, Cohn (4, 5) emphasized the
rostral order of dominance and ascribed signiﬁcance to “an ontogenetic or phylogenetic thalamic residue in the sensory organization
of the human brain.” He also noted speciﬁcally that this pattern
was primarily associated with “the over-all sentient function of
the brain.”
A more extensive elaboration of a maturational and developmental explanation of the order of dominance has been proposed
(14). Taking the infantile patterns of sutking and feeding as a
model, Linn ascribes dominance to the face as it is the oldest element
in the body image; the dominant role of the genital area to the intensity of pleasurable sensation that the infant elicits from masturbation; and the subordinate position of the hand to its role as an
exploring and tension-relieving appendage wherein it holds second
place in awareness to its stimulation of the more exciting mouth
and genitalia.
A neurophysiologic View was advanced by Critchley (6, 7), who,
after expressing a preference for the term “tactile inattention” instead of “extinction,” emphasized the rostral order of dominance.
He stated that “strong stimulation of the healthy side suppresses
the attenuated sensations on the impaired side,” and concluded
that “tactile inattention in parietal patients is probably no more
than an instance of local neglect or disregard, which may be demonstrated at times in many other spheres of consciousness besides the
tactile—whether motor, visual or spatial.”
A psychophysical explanation was eschewed by Bender, Fink and
Green (3, 10, 11), who found no relation between the order of
dominance and the tactile threshold for touch or pin prick. DennyBrown, Meyer and Horenstein (8), however, insisted that these patterns were only apparent when there was an alteration or loss of
twopoint discrimination. They further demonstrated that the extinction of the hand stimulus by a stimulus to the leg could be
overcome by four stimuli to the hand. The dominance of the cheek
to the hand could not, however, be altered by ten stimuli to the
hand in their subject.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

243

The following data further emphasize psychophysical factors in
perception under the conditions of multiple simultaneous stimulation. These studies represent the initial
report of an investigation
into the application of simultaneous tactile stimulation tests to the
problem of measurement of the alteration in brain function induced by electroshock therapy. In the course of this study electrical
stimuli were applied to the cheek and hand of psychiatric patients.
Stimuli were either at threshold or suprathreshold levels.
Two aspects of the data are presented: (a) the effect of alteration
of relative strength of stimulus in the order of dominance
on facehand tests; and (b) relation of perceptual thresholds to the order of

dominance.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

The subjects were thirty-four consecutive psychiatric patients
referred for electroshock therapy. The range of their
ages was between 21 and 65 and the mean age was 45. Eleven patients were
diagnosed as involutional melancholia, thirteen as manic-depressive,
depressed, eight as schizophrenia, and two as psychoneurosis mixed
type. All testing was done prior to a course of electroshock therapy
and no patient had clinical or EEG evidence of altered brain function. Each patient was tested in one session for the
purposes of this
report.
Two model S-4B Grass square wave stimulators were synchronized to deliver either single or two simultaneous electrical stimuli.
An isolation unit was connected to each stimulator to eliminate
artifacts and the output was monitored visually by an oscilloscope.
A switch box inserted in the circuit permitted
independent selection
of the various body parts. An active and an indifferent electrode,
required for each body part, were small 5%; inch steel discs placed
1 inch
apart and secured with tape. Bentonite electrode paste (Medcraft) was rubbed into the skin of each area before the electrodes
were applied. The electrodes remained afﬁxed to the selected body
parts throughout the period of testing.
The patient was placed on a couch in a relaxed and supine position. To alleviate undue anxiety the nature of the testing was described. It was emphasized that only a slight tap-like sensation
would be felt. The electrodes were then placed on (1) the dorsum
of the hands, (2) the mandibular area of both cheeks, and
(3) the
medial calf area of the legs.
In the testing procedure, thresholds for the various body
parts
were ﬁrst determined. At a frequency of .3 cycles/second, and a pulse
I

�244

KORIN—FINK

duration of 50 milliseconds, the voltage was increased in uniform
time increments of .67 seconds (2 pulses) monitored from the oscilloscope, until the subject perceived 100 per cent of the stimuli. Incre1 volt
of
increments
and
the
5
hand
volts
to
of
were applied
ments
to the cheeks. After a ten-second interval, the voltage was decreased
until sensation disappeared. Following another ten-second interval,
the voltage was gradually increased by 1 volt each six seconds until
the patient again reported 100 per cent of the stimuli. This reading
was considered the minimal voltage required to produce threshold

sensation.
Such stimuli, at threshold and 10 per cent above the threshold,
are reported by the subjects as a “tap,” a “prick” or a “sting.” Complaints of painful perception were not elicited at these levels of
stimulation.
After the thresholds were determined, testing with a series of
single and double simultaneous stimuli followed. The body parts
tested were the right hand and left cheek (heterologous stimulation)
and the right cheek and left cheek (homologous stimulation). Both
in
mixed
singly,
a
one
stimulated
or
simultaneously,
were
part
parts
order for ten trials for each of the following conditions: (1) threshold, (2) suprathreshold (10 per cent above the threshold), (3) one
body part at suprathreshold and the other at threshold, and (4) the
reverse of (3). The order of presentation of conditions (1) and (2)
was alternated for different subjects and the same was done for
conditions (3) and (4). Similarly the order of presentation of the
heterologous and homologous stimulation was alternated.
Single stimuli were introduced as a control. Failure to report
the single stimulus indicated that the threshold had changed. When
this change occurred, stimulation was increased until a new threshold was determined and ten trials were started anew.
RESULTS

A. Threshold Values

The threshold stimulation for perception was determined for
the hands, cheeks and legs (Table I). The threshold values for the
hands and legs are three to four times higher than the thresholds
for the cheeks. While the threshold values in the legs are less than
in the hands, these differences lack statistical signiﬁcance. Variabiland
hands
the
in
legs
is
threshold
considerably
the
of
greater
ity
than in the cheeks. There is virtually no overlapping of thresholds,
however, where the cheeks and the hands are concerned.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION
TABLE

245

I

Mean Thresholds and Standard Deviations of Body Parts

Mean
Thresholds (volts)
Standard
Deviation

Right

Cheek

Left
Cheek

Right
Hand

Left
Hand

Right

Leg

Left
Leg

6.76

7.85

29.25

22.35

24.50

19.52

4.47

4.86

14.88

13.60

13.99

13.64

Extinction Patterns
The difference between the number of extinctions of the right
hand or the left cheek on stimulation of both parts with either
threshold or suprathreshold stimuli was not signiﬁcant (Table 11).
Also, when both cheeks were stimulated with either threshold or
suprathreshold stimuli, there were no differences in the number of
extinctions in each cheek (Table III).
In contrast to these observations, stimulating one body part with
a suprathreshold stimulus and the other at threshold resulted in a
signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the body part stimulated
at threshold. Thus the cheek was dominant over the hand, or the
hand was dominant over the cheek depending on the body part to
which the stronger stimulus was applied (Table II). Altering the
relative strength of the stimuli applied to the cheeks resulted in a
similar predictable change in the pattern of dominance (Table III).
Further analysis of the data in Table II indicates that the hand
B.

TABLE 11

Mean Extinctions of Cheek and Hand for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation
Mean
Mean
Extinctions Extinctions
of Hand
of Cheek

Hand and Cheek at
Threshold
Hand and Cheek at
Suprathreshold
Hand at Suprathreshold
and Cheek at Threshold
Cheek at Suprathreshold
and Hand at Threshold

Difference Signiﬁcance

1.55

1.56

.01

NS.

1.02

.59

.57

NS.

2.30

.22

2.08

p&lt;.01

.32

1.36

1.04

p&lt;.01

�KORIN—FINK

246

was dominant over the cheek with greater mean frequency (2.08)
than the cheek was dominant over the hand (1.04) for the thresholdsuprathreshold condition. This tendency is also evident when both

parts were simulated at suprathreshold. If it is considered that the
mean threshold for the hands is approximately 30 volts, while for
the cheeks the threshold is 7 volts, the difference in incidence of
extinction may be explained. Suprathreshold stimulation was set
at 10 per cent above the threshold value. The hand stimulus was
TABLE 111

Mean Extinctions of Both Cheeks for Varying
Conditions of Threshold and Suprathreshold Stimulation

Both Cheeks at

Threshold

Both Cheeks at

Mean
Extinctions
of Left
Cheek

Mean
Extinctions
of Right
Cheek

.39

.45

.06

N.S.

Difference Signiﬁcance

Suprathreshold
Right Cheek at
Suprathreshold and
Left Cheek at Threshold

.18

.37

.19

N.S.

.96

.14

.82

p&lt;.05

Left Cheek at Suprathreshold and Right
Cheek at Threshold

.03

1.28

1.25

p&lt;.01

therefore increased by 3 volts and the face stimulus by only 1 volt
above the threshold value. Such an increase, although proportionately equivalent, appears to have given greater relative strength to
the hand stimulus.

Extinction
Regardless of pattern, the mean total of the number of extinctions was greater when heterologous body parts were stimulated at
threshold than when these parts were stimulated with suprathreshold stimuli (Table IV). For these same conditions of stimulation the
diﬂerences between the mean number of extinctions obtained on
homologous stimulation of the cheeks lack statistical signiﬁcance,
but the results are in the direction which indicate that a greater
number of extinctions occur when two body parts are stimulated
at threshold (Table IV). The failure to obtain a. signiﬁcant difference in the latter instance is partly due to the fact that relatively few
C. Incidence of

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

247

TABLE IV

Mean of Combined Number of Extinctions For Varying Conditions
of Threshold and Suprathreshold‘ Stimuli

Both Parts at Both Parts at A-Suprathreshold A-Threshold
Threshold Suprathreshold B-Threshold
B-Suprathreshold
A-Cheek

3.11

1.63

1.68

2.43

.85

.56

1.31

1.10

B-Hand
A-Left Cheek
B—Right Cheek

Differences between the mean number of extinctions at threshold and the
other three conditions of stimulation are signiﬁcant for the cheek and hand but
are insigniﬁcant for both cheeks.
*

extinctions are elicited when homologous parts are stimulated.
These ﬁndings on the total number of extinctions are in agreement
with previous observations (2).
DISCUSSION

The pattern of extinction following electrical stimulation of the
skin with threshold and suprathreshold stimuli has been determined.
In contrast to the ﬁndings of investigators (3) who used clinical
(tactile) stimulation, the face stimuli were not reported more frequently than the hand Stimuli. Under the conditions of the method
of testing in this investigation, nevertheless, it is clear that the
pattern of extinction for any two body parts can be readily altered
by varying the relative strength of the stimuli. Thus a suprathreshold stimulus applied to the hand tends to obscure a threshold stimulus applied to the cheek and when these stimulus intensities are
reversed, the cheek tends to obscure the hand.
Theories which hold that dominance of the cheek over the hand,
in simultaneous tactile testing, is due to an inherent factor, perceived body image, rostral dominance, developmental principle or a
learned factor, are not supported by these observations under our
conditions of testing. If any of these factors were involved, a pattern
of face dominance should have been elicited when the hand and
cheeks were stimulated with equivalent electrical stimuli at threshold and suprathreshold intensities, despite the methodological dif-

�248

KORIN—FINK

ference introduced by the procedure of affixing electrodes to the
skin.
The ﬁndings in this study, namely that differences in the strength
of the simultaneous stimuli can alter the pattern of extinction, supports a stimulus-intensity hypothesis. By inference, differences in
threshold also play a signiﬁcant role.
That an intense stimulus elsewhere can raise the pain threshold
as much as 35 per cent has been demonstrated by Hardy, Wolf and
Goodell (13). This effect of a relatively intense stimulus on the
threshold of another stimulus has also been found by investigators
using other stimuli (8, 9). The problem still remains, however, how
it is that a pattern of dominance may be elicited when presumably
equivalent stimuli are applied by touch stimuli.
The results of this study suggest an explanation. Stimuli of
differing intensities are required to elicit a threshold sensation for
various body parts. When these stimuli are increased 10 per cent,
the resultant stimuli are proportional and are perceived as equivalent. In contrast, in clinically touching two body parts, the stimuli
are disproportionate relative to the threshold value although approximately of equal intensity in their application. Because of the
differences in threshold for the hand and cheek, the tactile stimulus
to the cheek is proportionately more above the threshold than the
stimulus to the hand. Thus the cheek is perceived more frequently
than the hand stimulus and has been considered “dominant.”
A threshold hypothesis was rejected (3) on the basis that the
thresholds obtained by von Frey (16) for pressure and pain do not
strictly correspond to the dominance order elicited by the double
simultaneous stimulation tests. Most difﬁcult to reconcile is von
Frey’s ﬁnding that the pressure threshold of the glans penis, which
is second in dominance rank only to the cheek in a group of ten
body parts tested, is 111 grams per square millimeter; while the
threshold of the hand, which is at least dominant, is only 12 grams
per square millimeter.
Unfortunately, thresholds in the genital area for male and female have seldom been determined. Von Frey’s list of thresholds
(16) is based on a single subject. His more detailed observations (17),
however, indicate that there is virtually no pressure sense in the
glans penis or clitoris, although the perception of pain, warmth and
cold is well developed. It is quite possible that the punctate pressure threshold does not correlate with touch where the genital area
is concerned but that instead some other sense or combination of
senses is involved.

�STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION

249

Thresholds for the dorsum of the hand and the cheek obtained
by von Frey and other investigators indicate that the cheek is considerably more sensitive than the hand. These ﬁndings are in agreement with the thresholds obtained in this study. In a recent study
of electrical thresholds at various body sites Sigel (15) reported that
“leg areas including thigh and ankle, also dorsum of the hands and
the palm showed a deﬁnite tendency for higher thresholds. Scalp,
temple, forehead and face tended to have lower thresholds. The
anterior chest and upper arm and anterior wrist areas showed a
tendency for lower thresholds. Neck areas, abdomen and upper back
showed no deﬁnite trend.” In this statement there is no disagreement with the clinically observed order of dominance.
From the experimental results obtained here, it is proposed that
the dominance hierarchy elicited under the conditions of simultane—
ous testing may be explained on the basis of the relative strength
of the stimuli and the stimulus threshold.
SUMMARY

Using square wave electrical stimuli, the threshold for perception in the hands, cheeks and calves were determined in thirtyfour psychiatric patients. Simultaneous stimuli were applied in
random sequence to combinations of cheek and hand and both
cheeks, at threshold, suprathreshold and combinations of threshold
and suprathreshold intensities.
With simultaneous threshold, or simultaneous suprathreshold
stimulation, the differences between the number of extinctions in
either part were not signiﬁcant. With stimuli of unequal intensity
(one stimulus at threshold and one suprathreshold), however, there
was a signiﬁcant increase in the failure to report the threshold
stimulus.
The total number of extinctions is greater with threshold than
with suprathreshold stimuli; and greater in heterologous than in
homologous patterns of stimulation.
It is concluded that the observed order of dominance in simultaneous cutaneous tests may be explained by psychophysical relationships.
REFERENCES
(1)

Bender, M. B.: Disorders in Perception. Springﬁeld, Ill.: Charles Thomas,

(2)

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M. 8c Green, M. A.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (9 Psychiat., 66:

1952.

355-362, 1951.

�250
(3)

KORIN—FINK
Bender, M. B.; Green, M. A. 8: Fink, M.: Patterns of Perceptual Organization
with Simultaneous Stimuli. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. 67- Psychiat., 72:233-255
,
1954.

(4)

(5)

(5)
(7)
(8)
(9)

(10)
(11)

Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of the Sensory Organization of the Human
Brain: A Study in Rostral Dominance as Determined by Ipsilateral Simultaneous Stimulation. J. New. 6» Ment. Dis., 113:471-484, 1951.
Cohn, R.: On Certain Aspects of Sensory Organization of the Human Brain:
II—A Study in Rostral Dominance in Children. Neurology, 1:119-122, 1951.
Critchley, M.: The Parietal Lobes. London: Edward Arnold 8c Co., 1953.
Critchley, M.: Phenomenon of Tactile Inattention with Special Reference
to Parietal Lesions. Brain, 72:538-561, 1949.
Denny-Brown, D.; Meyer, J. S. 8c Horenstein, S.: The Signiﬁcance of Perceptual Rivalry Resulting from Parietal Lesion. Brain, 75:433-471, 1952.
Duncker, K.: Some Preliminary Experiments on the Mutual Inﬂuence of
Pains. Psychol. Forsch, 21:311-326, 1937.
Fink, M. Sc Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile Stimuli in
Normal Children. Neurology, 3:27-34, 1953.
Fink, M.; Green, M. A. 8c Bender, M. B.: Perception of Simultaneous Tactile
Stimuli by Mentally Defective Subjects. J. Nerv. 69'» Ment. Dis., 117:43-49,
1953.

(12) Fink, M.; Green, M. A.
(13)

(14)
(15)

(15)

Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign of Organic Mental Syndrome. Neurology, 2:46-58, 1952.
Hardy, J. D.; Wolf, H. S. 8c Goodell, H.: Studies on Pain. A New Method
for Measuring Pain Threshold: Observations on Spatial Summation of Pain.
J. Clin. Invest., 19:649-658, 1940.
Linn, L.: Some Developmental Aspects of the Body Image. Int. J. Psychoanal., 36:1—7, 1955.
Sigel, H.: Cutaneous Sensory Threshold Stimulation with High
Frequency
Square-Wave Current: 11. The Relationship of Body Site and Skin Diseases
to the Sensory Threshold. J. Invest. Derm., 18:447-451, 1952.
von Frey, M.: Beitréige zur Physiologic des Schmerzsinns. Ber. Siichs. Ges.
8c

Wiss., 46:185-196, 283-296, 1894.
(17) von Frey, M.: Beitrage zur Sinnesphysiologie der Haut. Ber. Siichs.
Ges.
Wiss., 47: 166-184, 1895.

�NEWS AND NOTES

DR. MILLER ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTOR OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller, Medical Director of Hillside Hospital, has
announced the appointment of Dr. Lewis L. Robbins of Topeka,
Kansas as Director of Professional Services at Hillside Hospital,

starting July 1, 1958.
Dr. Robbins has been connected for many years with the Menninger Foundation, and has held many senior positions at the
Foundation, including the Directorship of the Outpatient Depart
ment, and up to about a year ago, the Directorship of the Department of Adult Psychiatry. During the past year, he has been Senior
Psychiatric Consultant and Chairman of the Psychotherapy Research
Project at Menninger’s.
Born in Chicago, Dr. Robbins was graduated from the University
of Chicago and received his medical training at the Rush Medical
School. He interned at the Michael Reese Hospital, Chicago; and
had his psychiatric residency training at the latter hospital as well
as at the Menninger Sanitarium. He graduated from the Topeka
Institute for Psychoanalysis. He is a Diplomate of the American
Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and also holds the American
Psychiatric Association’s Certiﬁcate as a Mental Hospital Administrator.
Dr. Robbins has been an instructor in psychiatry at the Washington School of Medicine and a lecturer in psychiatry at the University of Kansas Medical School, the Menninger School of Psychiatry
as well as a training analyst at the Topeka Institute for Psychoanalysis. He is a member of numerous national and regional societies, including fellowship in the American College of Physicians,
the American Psychiatric Association, American Orthopsychiatric
Association, the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry; and he
also holds important ofﬁces on the executive and other committees
of the American Psychiatric and American Psychoanalytic Associations, and is currently the Secretary of the American Psychoanalytic
Association.
Hillside welcomes Dr. Robbins to its staff. The position of Directorship of Professional Services will include the general direction
of the Hospital’s treatment, teaching, and some of the important
research programs of the Hospital.
251

�252

NEWS AND NOTES
SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR RESIDENTS DURING 1957—1958

We are pleased to announce that we have engaged the teaching
services of three prominent psychiatrists and psychoanalysts for the
special instruction of our Residents during the 1957-1958 season.
These are:
(1) Dr. Robert C. Bak, whose course will be on “The Psychopathology of the Psychoses, with Special Reference to the Schizophrenias.” The lectures will be given at the Hospital on Wednesdays
from October 1957 through May 1958, from 12:00 to 1:00 P.M.
(2)Dr. Paul Goolker, who will be giving the course on “Principles
and Practice of Dynamic Psychotherapy for Hospitalized Patients.”
This course will be given during the same period on Fridays from
12:00 to 1:00 RM.
(3) Dr. I. Peter Glauber will be in charge of the course on
“Important Readings in Psychoanalytic Psychiatry.” This will be
given at the Hospital on Thursdays from 11:45 A.M. to 12:45 P.M.
As has been the custom, these lectures to the total Resident staff
will be preceded by three hours of special conferences including
group preceptorship of a number of Residents and their particular
Supervisor.
A SPECIAL COURSE OF LECTURES ON GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY

We have the pleasure of announcing that Dr. Aaron Stein, the
Director of the Group Psychotherapy Program at the Hospital, will
be giving an introductory course of lectures to our Resident staff;
and that all members of the psychiatric Attending Staffs and the
Clinical Assistants of both the Manhattan and Queens Clinics are
cordially invited to attend.
The lectures will be held at the Hospital in Glen Oaks on Saturday mornings from 9:00 to 10:15 A.M., beginning Saturday, September 28 and up to Saturday, December 21.
Dr. Stein is an Associate Attending Psychiatrist at the Hospital
and an authority in group psychotherapy. He plans to cover the
important practical aspects of the subject, including general principles, selection of patients, group psychodynamics. the role of the
group therapist, relationship between group and individual psychotherapy, etc.
J.S.A.M.

�Recent and Forthcoming Publications
INSTINCTIVE BEHAVIOR
The Development of a Modern Concept
Translated and edited by CLAIRE H. SCHILLER
Introduction by KARL S. LASHLEY
With contributions by Konrad Lorenz, Paul H. Schiller, Nicholas
Tinbergen, Jakob von Uexkiill
120 illustrations, $7.50

EROGENEITY AND LIBIDO
Some Addenda to the Theory of the Psychosexual Development of

the Human
Psychoanalytic Series, Volume I

By ROBERT FLIEss

$7.50

YOUTH AND CRIME
Proceedings of the Law Enforcement Institute Held at New York
University
Edited by FRANK J. COHEN
$6.00

ON THE UTILITY OF MEDICAL HISTORY
Institute on Social and Historical Medicine, Monograph I
The New York Academy of Medicine
Edited by IAGO GALDSTON

$2.00

ON NOT BEING ABLE TO PAINT
New Revised Edition
By MARION MILNER

Foreword by

illustrated, $4.50

ANNA FREUD

or order directly from
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street
New York 11, N. Y.

At your bookstore

1]

�THE INDEX OF PSYCHOANALYTIC WRITINGS
ALEXANDER GRINSTEIN, M .D.
5 Volumes, sold as set only, $75.00

Volumes I and II, now available

Volume III, Fall, 1957

The Index covers the entire psychoanalytic literature through 1952.
Every book, article, review or abstract is listed in alphabetical sequence
according to authors and titles. There are approximately 37,500 listings
drawn from 25 psychoanalytic publications and some 75 journals containing articles by psychoanalysts or about psychoanalysis and closely
related subjects. Psychoanalytic books and articles, published in 21
languages, have been included, and foreign-language titles have been
translated into English. The most invaluable feature is a separate subject
index with some 30,000 topical entries. In addition, there are a number
of appendices. One of them lists nonanalytic books reviewed in psychoanalytic journals. The others are devoted to a chronological listing of

the writings of psychoanalytic pioneers. Among them is the ﬁrst complete bibliography of Sigmund Freud’s writings and published letters.
Dr. Heinz Hartmann says: “Psychoanalysis has reached a stage at
which a truly comprehensive index of analytical literature has become
a necessity. Many questions of principle had to be decided, on the
methods of listing, on the degrees of inclusiveness, etc., in order to
make this Index a valuable tool for research workers in psychoanalysis
and related ﬁelds. Dr. Grinstein made these decisions with considerable
wisdom and objectivity, guided by a lucid understanding of all the
rather complex problems inherent in his tremendous task. This task
might well have looked forbidding and frightened off many a less
courageous man. Having become accustomed to using Volume I of
The Index of Psychoanalytic Writings (other volumes are to follow
soon), I can say that the obvious difﬁculties of this comprehensive
venture have been successfully overcome and that this imposing work
has proved of the greatest value to me, and without doubt to very
many others.”
At your book store

or order directly from
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227 West 13 Street
New York 11, N. Y.
.
1]

�JOURNAL of the

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
VOLUME

VI

1957

NUMBERS 1-4

CONTENTS
Scientiﬁc Papers
Blane, Howard T. and Glad, Erik—THE

PSYCHOLOGIST AND
THE PSYCHIATRIC TEAM IN A RESPIRATOR CENTER
.

Boyer, L. Bryce—THE MEANING
SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENT

Desmonde, William H.—THE
ANIMAL SACRIFICE

.

.

OF INSULIN THERAPY TO A
.

.

24

.

.

.

.

.

.

ORIGIN OF MONEY IN THE
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Devereux, George—THE

CRITERIA OF DUAL CO‘MPETENCE IN
PSYCHIATRIC-ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDIES .

87

Fink, Max—A

UNIFIED THEORY OF THE ACTION OF PHYSIODYNAMIC THERAPIES .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Glynn, Eugene—THE THERAPEUTIC USE
ADOLESCENT PAVILION

.

.

.

OF SECLUSION IN AN
.

.

Green, Martin A.—SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL
IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK .
.

Jaﬁe, Joseph—AN OBJECTIVE

1 9‘7

.

.

.

.

156

VARIABLIITY
.

229

.

STUDY OF COMMUNICATION IN
.

207

FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY
MENTAL HOSPITAL .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

216

PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Kakn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; and Fink, Max—SOCIAL

Karin, Hyman and Fink Max—ROLE

OF STIMULUS INTENSITY
IN PERCEPTION OF SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS

STIMULI.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

241

�Locke, N orman—REMARKS

PSYCHOLOGY AND THE

ON THE

GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY OF THE HARD OF HEARING

100

.

M eerloo, ]oost A. M .—Kos

AGAINST KNIDOS: AMBIVALENCE AS
THE PSYCHIATRIC OUTLOOK ON MAN .
.
.
.
.

67

M ullan, H ugh—GROUP

PSYCHOTHERAPY IN PRIVATE PRACTICE:
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

34

Nz'ederland, William

G.——THE SYMBOLIC RIVER-SISTER EQUATION IN POETRY AND FOLKLORE

Reider, N OTman—TRANSFERENCE

PSYCHOSIS

Slap, Joseph William—PSYCHOTHERAPY

91
131

.

WITH A CASE

OF

43

MALADIE DES TICS

Slap, [oseph William—SOME CLINICAL

AND

THEORETICAL

150

REMARKS ON CHESS

Clinical Symposium
OUTPATIENT TREATMENT VIA PSYCHOTHERAPY OF A CHARACTER NEUROTIC WITH IMPOTENCE
Part 1: Case presentation by Lionel Blackmcm

Part II:

Discussion

Book Review
News and Notes

107
160
180

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

55,121,182,251

�NO and YES
on the genesis of human communication
By RENE A. SPITZ

$4.00

Dr. Spitz, well known for his original studies of the psychological

‘

i

development of infants, devote-s a monograph to the beginnings of com~
munication. He tackles this most important problem from a broad
basis, using the theoretical framework of pSychoanalysis; direct ob’servations of infants, both normal and abnormal; and the newest
ﬁndings of animal ethology, experimental psychology, embryology and
physiology. Skillfully integrating the dataiobtained by thesescience'sr
Dr. .Spitz presents a most fascinating and thought-provoking theory of,
the roots of communication, both verbal and nonverbal.
Dr. Spitz eXa-mines the inherited or preformed motor behavior patterns whiCh have a function in the earl1est nursing situation. Both
negatiOn as well as afﬁrmation have such early motor prototypes, which
in the Course of deve10pment undergo a change of' function. Divorced,
fromthe behavior they originally subserved, these motor patterns can
now be utilized exclusively as signals of communication. Later, endowed with semantic meaning which the child acquires through identiﬁcation with the adult’s “No” gesture, they are used for communication proper.
Though drawing upon the data and theories of other sciences, the
framework of this monograph rests upon Freud's fundamental insights
into human pSychological development. Its, major contribution is the
minute examination of some of; the building blocks of‘Freud’s theory.
This proc'edUre permits the author to throw light on hitherto unexplored interrelations between speCIﬁc aspects of behaviOr1n infants.
these ﬁndings emerges the generally applicable concepts of
From
‘
“organizers of psychic development" as well as a description of the
origins of the Selfin infancy. These ﬁndings have the widest implications for clinical psychoanalysis as well as the study of human relations
in general.
.

.

‘

.&lt;

..

.1

2...:

.J

_

‘

’

—.—___‘_____________________
At your bookstore.
or order directly from
‘

1]

INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
227. West 13 Street
'New York 11, N. Y.
.
,

'

�M
THE PS’YCHOANALYTIC STUDY OF THE CHILD
Volume XII, $8.50

Contents. of the Newest Volume

ERNST KRIS,

1.9004957

Contributions to Psychoanalytic Theory

Nature and Development of the Concept of Repression in Freud's Writings
PHYLLIS GREENAcRE—The Childhood of the Artist
EDITH JACOBSON—On Normal and Pathological Moods
Pathoand
Normal
JEANNE LAMPL—-DE GRoor—On Defense and Development:

‘CHARLES BRENNER—The

logical

RUDOLPH M. LOE-WENSTEIM—eSomt}

Thoughts on Interpretation in the Theory

and Practice of Psychoanalysis
SEYMOUR L. LUSTMAN—Psychic Energy and Mechanisms. of Defense

’

Aspects of Early Development

CAsusoe-Anxiety Related to the Discovery of the‘Penis': An Observation. With an Introduction by ANNA FREUD
MARIANNE KRIS—The Use of Prediction in :1 Longitudinal Study
WILLIAM G. NIEDERLAND—The Earliest Dreams of a Young Child
GABRIEL

_

‘

ANNEMARIE SANDLER, ELIZABETH DAUNTON and ANNELIESE SCHNURMANN—
Inconsistency in the Mother as a. Factor in Character Development: A
Comparative Study. With an Introduction by ANNA FREUD
V

Clinical Contributions

PETER BLos—Preoedipal Factors in the Etiology of Female Delinquency
ERNA FURMAN—Treatment of UndeﬁFiV'es by Way of Parents
ELISABETH GELEERD—Some' ASPects

cents

of Psychoanalytic Technique in Adoles-

BELA MITrELMANN—‘Motility in the Therapy of Children
NATHAN N. ROOT—A Neurosis in Adolescence
MARGARETE

and Adults

RUBEN—Delinquency; A Defense Against Loss of ObjeCts and

Reality
LISBETH J. SACHS—On Changes in Identiﬁcation frOm Machine to Cripple
‘

Applied Psychoanalysis

the Salamander’
StanislaVsk-i
PHILIP WEISSMAN—The Childhood and Legacy of

ROBERT PLANK—On ‘fSeeing

______—__‘_____._______———————————or- order directly from
{I
At your bookstore
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES PRESS, INC.
0
New York 11, ‘N. Y.
227 West 13 Street,
.

.

�jam;
Rah at smug/1n Pox-caption of Simultaneous mm. swam
Pub}!

m

2

Karin $.13. and 3"!“ Fink Kenn

”amt at emu“ in “armament until. puma“: ha
m
been the object at midst-able discussion was. it: «napalm by Bender
and common and matron: wlmtim hm bun errand.

Ema:
12h.
threshold for perception
9150mm
maand
“mm,
3!;
mm
w psychiatric putienta.
«in:
mm,
simianeoua stimuli are applied in madam nqumo to lamination: o!
cheek md hand and both check: at 111mm, mthruhold and mama”
cf throdwld and mmthruhold human.

Bung aqua-o
in ’01:. hands,

Results:

40de

3mm:

cinnamon”
or
supnthromold «imam,
wmw,
the differences between the number of “auctions in aither part. were not.
nigaiﬁunt. Him «ml: or
mummy (m sum“ at thmhold
and one supmthmshold), Mater; then m a signiﬁcant meme in the
£13,1an ta «part tho thruhom.
with

W

Cancyuam
Thou data suppert tho
1:: simultaneous cutaneous

‘o‘ono "

”Ix/57

mmnm: tint the obnmd nrdor of Wm
mm are pmd upon paydmﬁysieal anaemia“.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2534">
                <text>Role of stimulus intensity in perception of simultaneous cutaneous electrical stimuli. J Hillside Hosp., 6: 241-250, 1957.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2535">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2536">
                <text>mfp-02-01-002-26-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2537">
                <text>1957</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2538">
                <text>Korin, Hyman; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2539">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2540">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2541">
                <text>Reprint From the Journal of the Hillside Hospital,Vol. VI October, 1957. Full copy of the Journal of The Hillside Hospital, Vol VI, No. 4, October 1957, Table of contents: A UNIFIED THEORY: OF THE ACTION OF PHYSIODYNAMIC- THERAPIEs by Max Fink; AN OBJECTIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEWS by Joseph Jaffe; SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL HOSPITAL by Robert L Kahn, Max Pollack and Max Fink; SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN EEG RESPONSE TO ELECTROSHOCK by Martin A. Green; ROLE OF STIMULUS INTENSITY IN PERCEPTION 0F SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICAL CUTANEOUS STIMULI by Hyman Korin and Max Fink; NEWS AND NOTES.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2542">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2543">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74456">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81017">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87578">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94139">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="288" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="79">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f9143989b4f022343ed9672f34b2d359.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1500dfbcc8282737a3c8c3677182eaf9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100705">
                    <text>WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUATION
1
OF IMIPBAMINE THERAPY
JOHN C. KRAMER, M.D.,2 DONALD F. KLEIN, M.D.,3
AND MAX FINK, M.D.‘

[Reprinted from THE

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY,

V0]. 118, No. 6, December, 1961]

�,

.

0

i

~
I

I‘NG- DISCONTIN'UATION

OFIMIPRAMINE THERAPY

1

.

V

IOHN

_'.-KHAMEH,
M.D;,2
c:

DONALD “E KLE‘I‘NQMD.)

mMAXFIN‘K, Mgn.4
r

v

I

'

�1961

1

CLINICAL NOTES

549

WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUATION
1
OF IMIPRAMINE THERAPY
JOHN C. KRAMER, M.D.,2 DONALD F. KLEIN, M.D.,3
AND MAX FINK, M.D.4

On discontinuation of imipramine 5 treatment some psychiatric patients reported
nausea, vomiting, dizziness, coryza, muscuAided, in part, by grant MY—2715 of National
Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of
Health, USPHS.
2 Post Doctoral Research Fellow, USPHS, 19601

1961.

Mental Health Career Investigator, USPHS.
From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L. I., N. Y.
5 The cooperation and assistance of Ceigy
Pharmaceuticals is gratefully acknowledged.
3
4

lar pains and malaise. The symptoms were
ﬁrst regarded as conversion phenomena, but
after several repetitions were considered
due to physiological withdrawal.
Of the patients treated with imipramine
45 had been observed within the hospital
during withdrawal of medication. Treatment was instituted with oral doses of 75
mg. daily and usually increased each week
in 75 mg. steps. The daily maintenance dose
was 300 mg./day in 34 patients, more than
300 mg./day in 3 patients, and less than

�550

CLINICAL NOTES

300 mg./day in 8 patients.

We reviewed our interview records and
the daily nursing notes, noting reports of
withdrawal symptoms within 48 hours of
cessation of medication in 25 of the 45 patients. Most prominent were nausea with or
without vomiting—16 subjects, headache—
10, giddiness—lO, coryza—8, chills—6, weakness and fatigue—5, and musculoskeletal
pain—4.
Twenty—two of 26 patients treated for 2

months or longer reported withdrawal
symptoms, while only 3 of 19 patients
treated less than 2 months reported similar
symptoms (p&lt; .001).
The 25 patients who had been treated
for more than 2 months were rated for
severity of symptomatology. The reaction
was scored as “marked” if subjects reported
more than 2 different symptoms with signiﬁcant distress and as “minimal” if they
reported fewer than 2 symptoms causing
minor distress, or no symptoms. Of 13 patients with a medication tapering and termination period of less than 2 weeks, 8 had
marked withdrawal symptoms and 5 mini—
mal. Of 12 with a medication termination
period longer than 2 weeks, only 2 subjects
demonstrated marked withdrawal symptoms

(p:.05).

These results are in keeping with the
general experience that the intensity of
physiological withdrawal symptoms is directly proportional to the duration of drug
administration and the abruptness of withdrawal. We could not relate the withdrawal
syndrome to the size of the maintenance
dose, since our range was too small. However, our modal schedule of 300 mg. per day
is larger than the usual clinical schedule of
100 to 150 mg. per day and may account
for the inconspicuousness of this phenomenon in other studies.
We observed that allowing a period of
2-4 weeks for withdrawal was prophylactically effective. When symptoms on imipramine discontinuation occurred they
could readily be treated by resuming imipramine at 50 mg. daily and gradually decreasing over a 1-week period.

[

December

DISCUSSION

A physiological withdrawal syndrome
following the termination of treatment with

opiates, demerol, barbiturates, glutethimide,
alcohol, chlorpromazine and meprobamate
is well known. Recently withdrawal symptoms with methaminodiazepoxide(2), nialamide(1) and alpha-ethyltryptamine(5)
have been reported. Kuhn( 3) and Mann
and Macpherson(4) have also reported
symptoms on abrupt imipramine withdrawa1.

Until recently the physiological withdrawal syndrome was considered restricted
to CNS “depressants” such as opiates, barbiturates and alcohol. This was conﬁrmed
by the absence of such a syndrome with
“stimulant” drugs such as cocaine, d-amphetamine, marijuana, mescaline and LSD. The
occurrence of such a syndrome with imipramine, nialamide, and alpha-ethyltryptamine is of considerable interest, therefore,
since these drugs have been loosely referred
to as “psychic energizers” with energetic
effects similar to “stimulant” drugs. It is
apparent that a simple depression—stimulation dimension is inadequate to describe the
complexity of drug effect both physiologically and behaviorally.
The withdrawal syndrome complicates
the evaluation of patients after drug discontinuation since both patients and physicians often interpret the onset of symptoms
as an upsurge of “anxiety” related to incipient relapse, and resume treatment with
the gratifying subsidence of the “anxiety.”
This may cause both patients and physicians
to overvalue the importance of the medication to the patient’s stability.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Hollister, L. E., Motzenbecker, F. P., and
Prusmack, J. J. : J. Clin. Exp. Psychopath., 21 :
212, 1960.
2. Hollister, L. E., Motzenbecker, F. P., and
Degan, R. 0.: Psychopharmacologia, 2: 63,
1961.
3. Kuhn, R: Schweizerische Medizinische
Wochenschrift, 87: 1135, 1957.
4. Mann, A., and Macpherson, A. : Canad.
Psychiat. Assoc. J., 4: 38, 1959.
5. Turner, W. I., and Merlis, S. : J. Neuropsychiat., 2 : 1961.

��Htth¢r¢wnl Symptonu ralluvtnz

Discontinuation at In1pran1uo fhurtpy

{can 6.

{rt-st,

H.D.#, nonald
and

r.

Kissn, x.n.u‘

In: link, 3.9.

from tho Departnont of Exporincntal rayohigtry,
3:110:40 lalpltal, Olen 00kt, 5.1., [.1.

ﬂoatorll Raconrch fallow, 88,38, 1960~1961.
oqnontnl lunlth euro-r Iavuatagutor, ssrus.
Aided, in part, by grant l1~2715 or Intionul Institute
01 Hantnl Health, Int1¢n¢1 Iu|t1tutoa at laulth, yarns.
the caoportttou and aauiutanoo ot_6.1¢y Pharancauttcal:

O

P98?

52.301111: nekuuvlcdaod.
VI: 6/29/61
13

�discontinuation of iliprsniss trsstnsnt sons
pstissts, ands: obssrvssisa ts: s vsristy a: psychistric
sysdrssss, rsportsd nsssss, vssiting, dissinsss, ssryss,
ssscslsr psins sad Islsiss. Ens sysptsss ssrs first
rsgsrdsd ss osmvsrsisa phsnousns, but stisr ssvsrsl
rspstitisns vs sonsidsrsd thsss to be dss to physiological withdrsssl sad an sttolpt vss nsds to dotsrsins
their trsqusaoy sad varisty.
o: the pstisats trsstsd with isiprssins during sn
sightoon nsnth psriod, forty-11's hsd bssn observed
within the hospitsl sstting during withdrawal of ssdissties. In thsss subsects trsstnsnt was instituted with
arsi dosss st 75 s; dsiiy sad ssnsliy issrssssd sssh
sssk in 75 as stsps. Ins dsiiy‘ssistsnsaes dsss ass
zoo aglsay in thirty-tour puss-ntsg loss than 300 ltldly
in tires pstisass; and loss thin 300 Is/dsy in sight
0n

pstisats.
rsvisssd our intsrviss rssords and ﬁts dsily
ssrsiac notss, noting rspsrss o: uithdrsssl symptoms
within k8 hours of ssssstisa or sodiostion in 25 of
tho h! pstisnts. (rsbls I)
Vs

n“.-.IABLE

I

-D.-”-

�2.510

I

aynptonl Within an Intro 01 cunna$1on or Iniprnnino therapy’

Pnttontl conning theft?!
Patients reporting Iynptonu

hS

25

azggtons

l:unou (and/or vomiting)

16

Houdnoho

10

GiddinOII

.

10

Darya:

chill:
taintnuuu
HIIoqu-Ikolotsl pain
Hoaknosu or

rmma

�.29

ovidoat

whoa
tho aurorolottonohip
otguitioont
ttoo o: trootlont and tho oppooroaoo of orlptono oro oomporod. (Toblo I!) toasty-too of tvonty-otx patients
trootod for two ooutho or longor roportod withdruvol
oyuptono, whilo only throo of ntnotoon potionto trootod
loo: than too nontho roportod otnilor oynptono.

1o

A

II
O
.‘O--..

fAILB

to dotornino tho rolotion of tho obouptaooo ot
nodiootton withdrovol to indoood oyuptouo, tho twentyrtvovpottonto who bod boon trootod for noro thou two
ooutho ooro rotod to: oovortty o: oynptoootoloay. rho
rooottoo woo ooorod oo 'norkod' 1: lobaooto roportod
ooro thou two dittoroot oynptono with otgaitioont diotrooo and to "minimal“ at tho: roportod towor than two
oyoptono oonoins lino: atotrooo, or no symptolo. Too
groupo ooro doriaod according to otothor tho poriod or
Iod1oot1on rodootton woo looo thou too rook: or too uooko
t or longoo. (foblo III)

“-Qﬂ‘..-.
TABLS

III

�Ink}: 1!
nurution of Iniprnltno Therapy
w1%hdr¢vn1
Symptoms

It

Withdrawal
Symptonu

(lubaootl)

(subjects)

in. isn‘t.

I

16

fun South: or hangar

22

h

Lon. thin

x9 .- 23.91.
P &lt;

.001

2gblo £51

rurtod or 3:3: Gestation In Patients
rruatcd st Lcnlt fro abnthn
Withdrawal 8232t¢nl

lurked

.

Lon. than rug

minimal

VIDEO

6

5

fun with: or Long.»

a

10

p ~ .05

(Fisher) (h)

�~3-

!haaa raaalta art in kaaping vita ﬁha can-val
asparianaa ihat tho iataaaity a: phyaiolocical
withdrawal aylptoua is directly proportional in tho
duration at drug adaiaiatration and tha abruptaaaa
at viﬁhdraaal. Va scald not ralata tha appaaranaa of
at: withdrawal ayndroao to tho aiaa o: tho aaiatauanea
doaa, ainoa our ranaa uaa too shall. ﬂovavar. our
natal aahadala a! 300 I; ha: day in largo: than tho
aaaal clinical aahadala a: 100 ta 150 a. par day and
nay account for an. inaauapioaaaaaaaa a: thin
phaaaaaaaa in Qatar atadiaa. It Iaat ha aataa that
withdrawal aylpiaaa was. unvaried by aaa patiaat aha

III traataa la: tua lantha at
75 In; par «7.

a marina. daaa

at

abaarvad that alluviag a parted at 3-h wacktar withdrawal ran prayhylaatiaally attaetiva. ihan
ayaptaaa an iaipraaiaa diaeoatinaatiaa acaurrad they
coal! readily be treated by raaaaing iaipraaiaa at
Ha

,

56

a; daily aid gradually aaaraaains era: a

parted.

one tack

�9h. accurrcauc a: a vhf-1010:1931 utthdrnnal
lyndronc tollcrtlg the tor-tnutton o: troninoat with
optntcl, duu.rol, burhtiurltcn. all$othilado and 1100301
1! wall kntln¢ looantly withdrlvul Irlgten- attachlsrptonnsaao (2), Isthnatnodinuapcxtlo {1). nialnuldo
(5}, alpha-oihyittyp‘anlno (9) and nuptniiluto (1,3,6)
lav. icon rcporﬁod. tan: (8) ha; ciao obstrvod lyuyton‘
on abrupt znlprnltno withdraanlo
Until riotatly it. phytiologteal iithdruu:1
cyadrono was coalidtroi routrtetcd to 618 'dcpréunsatn'
Inch OI splat... barblﬁurnsos and alcohol. this was
contirnod 57 Sh. tbacnco of such a cyndruno with
“stannlsnt‘ drugs tank .3 cocgtno, d-tlphotanino,
unhealino
and £39. In. accurronoc at such
antisulan,
a syndrcnn with tulprlltnu,43131anldn, and alpha.ihrltryptaazno 1- or etalldnrahll Satori-t, ‘horutorc.
can-o thus. drug: havn baa: 1.90.17 rtrorrcd to a:
'payuhao 0303:1302.“ 11$) unaruo‘tc o£1¢ctn 01-11::
'

human

an

to
u .1»:am... It 1.- .pnmt
Canto-liaa-stxlnlatioa dincnulun 1: tnnlcquat. to
donoribu tho.¢olploxtty or drug effect hath phyuso«
logically and behaviorully.

in.

at

withdrawal 9:362:30 conpl1oatbn tho avnlunttou
pcttcutn utter drug dicooutsnuatton, both oltniually

.

�hoth
and
patina“
an”
maximum,
punch:um 1“.»er tn ant a mu», (mans, to.
u a: spur" a: ‘uuaotyﬂ "1am to menu“ "up“.
and hum a mum ”amt an m ”any“.
«bum» a: a. 'mtoty'. m. any at!" ”a
and
plantain: to ova-van tho moral» of a.
plum“
noun“... to tho grunt“ gummy.
and

�m

1. no

taunts-u at «1pm»

”um“

product. phyutoIocto-l withdruwnl uynptonu, which
arc rolutod to luasth of ‘rontnaut and abruptuocn o:
withdrivui. aylptonn may also be rolntad to douaco
luv-1o

I.

H1thdrar¢1 lyyptons any h. militia-d qr
oltntuutod by running ﬁtchuaquol.
I

it.

aneurraaac of : withdranul syndrong
lath tnlprgnluo to porttnoaﬁ ta tn. coucoptunltus$1.: or its paynhowhnrnaaolocical notiviﬂr, and to

3.

prabltna

I: clinical

Isaac-hunt.

�1.

mu,

3.1., at.

an... Ida

W.

’-

33.3,.

1.

1023, 1955.

Inch.
3-.»

9.3.:

Mac, 3.3.

and

833. 1958.

lulu,

1.3.:

m:

a,

J,

931. 1959.

'mnﬁ:

MI

801301,
id.
8..
vgumMe
autumn,
m
ncﬁrtI-ltll, It! tort, 1956, 96.
5. lanai", In!” ”summer”, hr. and Pam-suck, 3.3.:
3 lmhﬂnﬁh, 3;: 212, 1960.
g, nun: L“
6- lolltltor, L.R. and ﬂlcsanar, !.8.s £3!3§22§£££££2¥3‘§2&amp;
196°.
3”,
;.
7. amour, In!” Runabout», LP. and Baa, the”

It.

”that, BA”

in

W
a

W.

I. ma. M

2-

‘3: 1951.

1135, 1957.

9.

Mar,

m1.

ad

lit-r110,

373, 1961 (app)... 1)

8.1 J,

Inn-3mg;

. g:

9.1:

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2874">
                <text>Withdrawal symptoms following discontinuation of Imipramine therapy. Amer J Psychiat, 118:549-50.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2875">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2876">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-56-022</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2877">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2878">
                <text>Kramer, John C.; Klein, Donald F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2879">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2880">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2881">
                <text>Reprint (Clinical notes) and [preprint]. Reprint from THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, V0L. 118, No. 6, December, 1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2882">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2883">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74490">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81051">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87612">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94173">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="286" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="77">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/0f6719a23fdc7ec86b84e3ad0121dcb7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2c174223139f67b6ca449ef570bd2067</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100703">
                    <text>SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO
REFUSE CONVULSIVE THERAPY

K

MAX POLLACK, PH.D.

Reprinted from THE

Vol. 132, N0.
L

2

Copyright ©

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE

by The Williams
Printed in U.S.A.

1961

&amp;

February,

Wilkins C0.

1961

�JOURNAL or NERVOUS AND MENTAL DIsEAsE
Volume 132, No. 2, February 1961

Reprinted from THE

Printed in U.S.A.

SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO
REFUSE CONVULSIVE THERAPY
MAX POLLACK, PH.D.1

The growing recognition of the relation of
social factors to referral for and response to
somatotherapy in psychiatric treatment has
stimulated increased study of “drop-outs”—
patients who refuse to start or to continue
treatment. Although the problem of “dropouts” is a major one in somatotherapy, it
has received little attention. In convulsive
therapy it is considered one of the most fre—
quent “complications” of treatment (1) yet
it is infrequently discussed (3, 7) and no
systematic studies have been devoted to it.
Systematic studies of “drop-outs” have
been limited for the most part to patients in
psychotherapy in out—patient facilities (4, 5,
9, 19, 20). These studies have consistently
shown marked differences in social and psychological characteristics of patients who remain in psychotherapy and those who fail to
continue. Those patients who remain in
therapy have more years of education and
who
those
class
social
than
of
higher
are
leave. In addition, their social attitudes, as
measured by the California F Scale, show
“less so—called conventionalism, stereotypy
and less of an uncompromising insistence
that ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ can be distinguished” (20).
In sociopsychologic studies of the patient
population of Hillside Hospital (12, 13) age,
education, place of birth and degree of
stereotypy, as measured by the F Scale, were
related to selection for, and response to,
convulsive therapy. Those patients who
were older, had fewer years of education,
were foreign-born and who manifested high
scores on the F Scale were most likely to receive convulsive therapy, be hospitalized for
Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., New York.
1

and MY—2715, National
Institute of Mental Health, U. S. Public Health
Service.
Aided by grants

MY—2092

AND

MAX FINK, M.D.

a shorter period, and be rated as improved at
time of discharge. In contrast, patients who
were younger, better educated, native-born
and who obtained low scores on the F Scale,
most often received psychotherapy as their
sole form of treatment, were hospitalized for
a longer time, and were more likely to be
discharged with a rating of unimproved.
Thus, the determination of psychiatric treatment was viewed as an interactive process,
and related to the background, cultural
values and communicative pattern of both
therapist and patient.
In view of this relation of psychosocial
factors to selection for and response to treat—
ment, it was postulated that in a psychotherapeutically—oriented hospital patients who
refuse or fail to complete convulsive therapy
would be signiﬁcantly younger, better educated, and be less stereotyped and conventional than patients who completed a course
of therapy. This study was undertaken to
test this hypothesis.
PROCEDURE

The seventy-ﬁve consecutive iii-patients
(27 males and 48 females) referred for con—
vulsive therapy at Hillside Hospital during
the one year period from October 1, 1957 to
September 30, 1958 were included in this
study. Hillside Hospital is a non-proﬁt
institution for the treatment of voluntary
patients. Psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary
method of treatment, with various somatotherapies available when necessary. All pa—
tients are seen for individual psychotherapy
three times a week, with psychotherapy
continuing when other treatment, 6.9., convulsive therapy, is administered.
Three social (age, education and nativity)
and one psychological measure (the Cali153

�154

POLLACK A ND FINK

fornia F Scale), were employed. A ten-item
modiﬁcation of the F Scale (6, 14) was administered to 53 referrals prior to treatment.
In this task, the subject reads 10 statements
and indicates whether he agrees or disagrees
with each statement, and to what extent.
The score given for each item ranges from
one to seven and the range of total scores is
ten to seventy. The greater the subject’s
agreement, with the statement, the higher
the score obtained. The statements themselves are extreme, conventional and stereotyped expressions. lr‘or example, one statement is, “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”
Patients were referred for convulsive therapy by the psychiatric resident with the ap—
proval, frequently at the suggestion, of his
supervisor. The referral form requesting
treatment was sent to the psychiatrist in
charge of the convulsive therapy unit for
medical examination and the institution of
treatment. Thus, it was possible to determine those patients who were referred for
treatment but who refused to start. Convulsive therapy was generally administered
three times a week, and grand mal convulsions were induced with the standard Medcraft alternating current instrument.
RESULTS

Of the 75 referrals for convulsive therapy,
13 refused treatment. Of these, seven failed
to start and six refused to continue treatment. In the latter group, the number of

treatments ranged from three to eight—
short of the generally prescribed course of at
least twelve treatments.
TABLE 1
Mean Age, Education and F Score by Group
N

Group

'

Acceptance
Refusal
Mean Difference
(One—tailed t
p&lt;

test)

62
13

(ﬁgs)

Educa-

0:325)

40.3 11.6
29.7 13.7
— 10.6 +2.1
2.5
1.9
.01

.025

F Score

48.7
37.7
— 10.0

2.2

.025

Social and Psychologic Factors: The group
of patients who accepted a full course of
convulsive therapy was signiﬁcantly older,
less educated and manifested a higher mean
F score than the group that refused treat—

ment (Table 1). Furthermore, 37 per cent of
the acceptance group were foreign-born as
compared to eight per cent of the refusal
group. While there was considerable overlap
between groups with respect to these factors,
the refusal group was more homogeneous
than the acceptance group. Thus, there were
no patients in the refusal group who had less
than ten years of education (69 per cent of
the group had attended college) and none
were over ﬁfty years of age. In contrast, 27
per cent of the acceptance group never went
beyond grade school (eight years or less)
and 31 per cent were ﬁfty years or older.
Differences in occupation between groups
paralleled the differences in education. Thus,
none of the patients in the refusal group were
unskilled or manual workers. They were in
clerical, professional and business vocations,
Whereas ten subjects in the acceptance
group were unskilled workers. Housewives
were excluded from this tabulation.
Relation to Diagnosis: The discharge diagnoses of seventy-three patients fell into four
major categories: psychoneurosis, schizophrenia, manic-depressive, or involutional
psychoses. Two patients were classiﬁed as
“psychotic depression” without further
speciﬁcation. Although there was no statistically signiﬁcant difference in diagnostic
composition between the group accepting
and those refusing treatment, the groups
were dissimilar with respect to the incidence
of the involutional psychoses (Table 2). No
patient in the refusal group was discharged
with a diagnosis of involutional psychosis,
whereas 24 per cent of the acceptance group
were so diagnosed. There was also a high
positive correlation between this diagnosis
and the sociopsychological factors studied.
Thus, the mean age (56.7 years) and F score
(61.4) were higher while the years of educa-

�155

REFUSAL OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY

tion (9.2 years) was lower than that for the
total refusal group (Table 1).
Relation to Improvement Ratings: At the
discharge conference held by the Medical
Director each patient is assigned one of four
improvement ratings: recovered, much improved, improved or unimproved. The incidence of recovered and much improved
ratings was signiﬁcantly lower in the refusal
group (Table 3). Six patients, all in the ac—
ceptance group, were rated as recovered.
The hospital discharges were more closely
associated with refusal or discontinuation of
treatment in the refusal group.
DISCUSSION

The present study conﬁrms and extends
previous ﬁndings in this laboratory (2, 12,
13) in demonstrating the importance of social
factors and their psychological correlates in
the selection for and response to psychiatric
treatment. It supports the hypothesis that in
a psychoanalytically-oriented hospital patients who refuse convulsive therapy would
more closely resemble those who remain in
psychotherapy and differ from those who
are selected for and treated with convulsive
therapy.
The lower 1“ scores in the refusal group
than in the acceptance group are correlated
with a less compliant attitude toward authority and a more analytic approach in interpersonal activities. Review of the patients’ hospital records revealed that negativism, belligerence, uncooperativeness and
attempts to manipulate the staff were more
common in the refusal group. For example,
38 per cent of the refusal group as compared
with only 17 per cent of the acceptance group
formally petitioned the Medical Director for
discharge from the hospital. (Almost all
these patients withdrew their request for
discharge shortly after the initial request).
Referral for convulsive treatment was more
often associated with problems of management, e.g., disturbing the ward or eloping
from the hospital, than for depressive or
confused thinking. In contrast, a higher

TABLE 2
Discharge Diagnosis by Group
Group

Manic.
Depressrve
Psychosis

Schizo.
-

Psychoneurosls

phrenla

Acceptance7 (11%)25 (40%)
2 (15%) 7 (54%)
Refusal
X2

13
4

Involu.
tlonal
Psychosis

(21%) 15 (24%)
(31%) 0 (0)

= 2.28, p = n.s.
TABLE

3

Discharge Improvement Ratings by Group
Group

Acceptance
Refusal
X2

Recoveredﬁ
Much

Improved

34 (55%)
3

(23%)

Improved

Unimproved

(31%)
5 (38%)

(15%)
5 (38%)

19

9

= 6.41, p = .05

percentage of the acceptance group were
referred for convulsive therapy for alleviation of depressive symptoms.
There is increasing evidence that accept—
ance or rejection of psychiatric treatment is
related to learned attitudes toward treatment by both patients and therapist (8, 9,
16, 17, 21). Most often these attitudes which
correlate with socio-economic status are
formed far in advance of treatment, and are
most likely an intrinsic part of the person’s
repertoire of behavior. Thus, patients from
lower class backgrounds more frequently
view psychiatric treatment as nonverbal and
in physical terms whereas typically “the
middle class patient is predisposed toward
the acceptance of psychotherapy even before he arrives at the clinic” (9).
In the sample studied there were many
expressions of a negative attitude toward
convulsive therapy long before the referral
for convulsive therapy had been made. One
patient, in treatment for several years prior
to her current hospital admission, terminated
treatment and transferred to another psy—
chiatrist on each occasion when convulsive
therapy was recommended. Another patient
asked to sign the voluntary certiﬁcation
form on admission, appended the following
note. “P.S., If I am given shock treatment

�156

POLLACK AND FINK

I’ll either kill myself or leave the hospital.”
Other patients, particularly those who have
been in individual psychotherapy prior to

hospital admission, state that their previous
therapists instructed them not to submit to
convulsive therapy in that it would be harm-

ful.

Perhaps more important than either attitude of the patient or the psychiatrist is the
factor of consistency of attitudes. Klerman
et al., (17) have reported that young resident
psychiatrists with psychoanalytic orientations frequently have unfavorable attitudes
toward somatic therapy and are ambivalent
about prescribing such treatment. In the
present study there were many indications
that referral for convulsive therapy was not
the “free” choice of the resident physician
but was made only after considerable pressure by administrative and nursing person-

nel.

A recent study by Kaplan and Lefkowits
(15) of staff and environmental factors

associated with referral for drug therapy in
this hospital demonstrated that the psychiatrist’s tolerance for disturbed behavior
was much higher than that of nurses and
other personnel. Frequently the resident
physician placed a premium on helping the
patient modify his behavior without resort
to somatotherapy. A similar observation was
made by Sabshin and Ramot (21) and by
Klerman (17) who found that “psychiatrists
treating a patient with psychotherapy were
unusually reluctant to add drug therapy.”
Such attitudes may be conveyed to patients
either overtly or covertly. Such observations
reinforce the ﬁndings of Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (18) that “despite protestations
by clinicians that their reference is always
the individual patient, clinicians, in fact
may be so overly committed to a particular
psychiatric school of thought, that the pa—
tient’s diagnosis and treatment is largely
predetermined.”
The studies here would suggest that the
psychiatrist’s ambivalent attitude toward

treatment is not a general attitude but is
related to the “social distance” of the patient
to himself. The psychiatric resident frequently has less difﬁculty in recommending
somatotherapy for a lower class patient but
is indecisive when it comes to making a
similar treatment referral for a patient who
is culturally more like himself.
The ﬁndings that objectors to convulsive
therapy were more often discharged from
the hospital as clinically unimproved is
consistent with previous observations (7).
Gordon (7) classiﬁed objectors into two
categories—poorly oriented catatonic subjects who offered resistance to the treatment
and responded with clinical improvement;
and a better oriented group who objected to
treatment on an attitudinal basis claiming
they were “not in need of them.” This latter
group were refractory to the clinical beneﬁts
of the treatment. Almost all of the patients
in the refusal group of the present study
could be classiﬁed in the latter group.
It is of interest that most of the patients
who refused convulsive treatment were
prognostically poor selectees for convulsive
treatment. In previous studies (2, 10, 11)
we have shown that the incidence of ratings
of improvement at discharge in young, welleducated, low F score patients was signiﬁeantly lower than in the older, less educated,
more stereotyped patients. The refusal group
is part of that group of patients who are
neither “ideal” patients for convulsive
treatment nor are they very responsive to
milieu treatment and psychotherapy.
While referral for convulsive therapy in
this and other hospitals has been markedly
reduced within the past few years, the problems associated with attitude toward treatment, of which treatment refusal is but one
aspect, are of persistent importance. In the
absence of speciﬁc therapies for the majority
of psychiatric disorders the further study of
decision-making in psychiatric treatment
may help delineate the forces associated with
selection of therapy.

�157

REFUSAL OF CONVULSIVE THERAPY
SUMMARY

8. HAEFNER, D. 1’., SACKs,

REFERENCES
Treatment of Mental Disorder,
p. 223. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1953.
2. FINK, M., KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M.
Psychological factors affecting individual
differences in behavioral response to convulsive therapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 128: 243—
1. ALEXANDER, L.

248, 1959.
3. FLESCHER, J. The “discharging

function” of
electric shock and the anxiety problem.
Psychoanal. Rev., 37: 277-280, 1960.
4. FRANK, J. D., GLIEDMAN, L. H., IMBER, S. 1).,
NASH, E. H., JR. AND STONE, A. R. Why
patients leave psychotherapy. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. Psychiat., 77: 283—299, 1957.
5. FREEDMAN, N., ENGELHARDT, D. M., HAN—
KOFF, L. B., GLICK, B. S., KAYE, H., BUCHWALD, J. AND STARK, P. Drop-out from outpatient psychiatric treatment. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. Psychiat., 80: 657—666, 1958.
6. GALLAGER, E. B., LEVINSON, D. J. AND ERLICH, I. Some sociopsychological charac—
teristics of patients and their relevance for
psychiatric treatment. In Greenblatt, M.,
Levinson, D. J. and Williams, R. W., eds.
The Patient and the Mental Hospital, pp.
263—285. Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., 1957.
7. GoRDON, H. L. ()bjectors to electric shock
treatment are refractory to its therapy.
New York J. Med., 46: 407—410, 1946.

AND

MAsoN,

A. S. Physicians’ attitudes toward chemotherapy as a factor in psychiatric patients’

As part of a continuing investigation of
the relation of sociopsychological factors to

psychiatric treatment, the present study
was concerned with the sociopsychological
characteristics of patients who refused to
start or to continue convulsive therapy.
Thirteen of the 75 consecutive voluntary patients referred for convulsive therapy refused treatment during a one year period in
a psychoanalytically-oriented institution.
These patients were younger, better edu—
cated and had lower scores on the CaliforniaF Scale than the group that accepted convulsive therapy. The diagnosis of involutional psychosis was absent in the refusal
group, and patients in the refusal group were
more often discharged as unimproved.
The acceptance or rejection of psychiatric
treatment is discussed in terms of learned
attitudes toward psychiatric treatment by
both patient and doctor.

J. M.

.

responses to medication. J. Nerv. Ment.
Dis., 131: 64—69, 1960.
IMBER, S. D., FRANK, J. 1)., (,iLIEl)MAN, L. H
NASH, E. H. AND SToNE, A. R. Suggesti—
bility, social class and the acceptance of
psychotherapy. J. Clin. Psychol., 12: 341—

344, 1956.
10. KAHN, R. L. AND FINK, M. Personality factors

in behavioral response to electroshock

11.

therapy. J. Neuropsychiat., 1: 45—49, 1959.
KAHN, R. L. AND POLLACK, M. Prognostic
application of psychological techniques in
convulsive therapy. Dis. Nerv. Syst., supp.

20, pp. 180—184, 1959.
12. KAHN, R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M. Social
factors in the selection of therapy in a

voluntary mental hospital. J. Hillside Hosp,
6: 216—228, 1957.

R. L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Sociopsychologic aspects of psychiatric
treatment. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,

13. KAHN,

1: 565—574, 1959.

L., POLLACK, M. AND FINK, M.
Social attitude (California F Scale) and
convulsive therapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.,

14. KAHN, R.

130: 187—192, 1960.
15. KAPLAN, A. AND LEFKOWITS, H. J. Inﬂuence
of staff attitudes and environmental factors

on treatment selection. J. Hillside Hosp.

In press.

Staff attitudes, decisionmaking and the use of drug therapy in the
mental hospital. In Denber, H. C. B. Research Conference on the Therapeutic Community, pp. 191—214. Thomas, Springﬁeld,

16. KLERMAN, G. L.

111., 1959.

17. KLERMAN, G. L., SHARAF,
AND LEVINSON, D. J.

M., HOLZMAN, M.
Sociopsychological
characteristics of resident psychiatrists and
their use of drug therapy. Amer. J. Psy-

chiat., 117:

111—117, 1960.

B., DINITZ, S. AND LEFTON, M.
Psychiatric orientation and its relation to
diagnosis and treatment in a mental hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127—132, 1959.
19. ROSENTHAL, D. AND FRANK, J. D. The fate
of psychiatric clinic out-patients assigned
to psychotherapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 127:
18. PASAMANICK,

330—343, 1958.

20. RUBENSTEIN, E. A. AND LORR, M. A. A com-

parison of terminators and remainers in
outpatient psychotherapy. J. Clin. Psychol.,
12: 345—348, 1956.

J. Pharmacotherapeutic evaluation and the psychiatric
setting. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.,

21. SABSHIN, M. AND RAMROT,

75: 362—370, 1956.

��We.

lama-b.1031“!

at

tutu. cantata norm

In:

rum

rum. and

“no“. at.

In rm IJ.

no What a: mum»: manna-y ' mum mum '
In.
v.1.
at...
at...
a»
18-1715.
”-10,!
of In“:
an
lulu-.1
mu
it
Intuit.
put
'0’.
M“. ma. M“

a“...

11: 9/60

�Iantipcyohnlnctosl chnruc‘arttttna at ratsenta

taint.

tit.
Q0

thirty:

eouvnlatvu

it.

cuoicz
rolaﬁton
tautlro
at
it.
and rdtpCIlc $0 Ions$0$tnrapr in porthtatrtt

staring ructun‘tsnn at

rclarv¢1

(It

mm. m sum-umainr£
M trout-nus. Althtlch
mu tauttuao

yutatasl

it: ratio. .3

i!

a: Fawn“

to

.-

«- ymm a "an-mm" u a mu m s. mutt-rm. u

1%
1a
couwnlltvu
In
$503.37
III ricolvli littlo tiluﬁitn.
oou§idorti CI. n! it: un¢$ troqunnt 'nlnpxtac‘lonc' If ﬁrutﬁn
aunt (1) 13¢ ££ in antvocnoutlr dinuutaod (3,1) and no ayutunn:&amp;c
ain‘t-u lava tutu duvntod it it.

Int-nun

am: a

“drip-MI“

have

In»

mm

tu-

m not m a nun» u gunman" 1: out-”um
«was.»
(magnum)
than
um mummy
suntan
..

adotnl
3nd pnrhhuloutaul charac‘nrw
dittouuuaol
tn
than: atrial
1:11.. at ptt4:a$u it: tannin tn pirutothornlr uni ti... It.
£111 to caustlnn.
tannin t: thattpy-tnvn Int:
paiaauat
who
oduunﬁtnn
and
than
30.1.1
013::
at
at
hialcr
sh...
art
gust:
U:
1“”. In «mu...
mu:
Baltturuxn I lgalo, than “low. manualzsd couvnntSontltnu. Icgr¢o~
twp; ‘3‘ 1.3. a: II Inuau’rCIttsu: titansonct ‘hnt 'rtchﬁ’ an:
‘arcuc‘ tun bu ‘10‘algutlhnd' (to).
In socioplrthologtc itnlsoi it ﬁt: yntanut )aytlntlau ct
(12.13) no.
Ian-u.
pm. at
10:20. or otartoiwpy. an na‘iurud by it: I 8.519, Utr- tilti.‘ to
tclucttou tit. and roupauna to. can'tlusvo shortly. than. p¢‘10nsa

it...

W

mam

it.

int“,

man,

n ma“

m

um m

�-2...

m m. am. in am run 0: mm. mo tau-om
than all In Mum huh um. a m I an. an no»

In
“an”.
t
Win
mum
awm mu. m N am a ups-mi u «a “ «um.
mm;

‘0

"not“

I: mun».

be

”an“ m m m». bum uuum. nun

mmvhctWMImu-Iﬁolluu. and“.
rmtwl yam-Wm at am «to m at “has. my
non-1mm: sham-run. mmw. mans-u

M. M 4m“.
If par-mutt “an.“ m um :- u «mm.» mu,
um «um to in
«1m
«4
mm;
mm.
Watt"
and
a
yum m mm ”no“.
I: van a an ”10“.!“
run" a
«noun a: m rm» “Inna-at. u m mans-d
that
urn-um
pmlmlpﬂﬂum
mm: aunt: m
can
5.
mm»
mu
a
a
sauna-u:
mm mm
m. mm «mm.
and
an
at
n
autumn «mumz
mm.
than ”an“ m
a
this
emu
”my
a
mm.
mm
an mm to an m: Wu.
«mug:

with a

nut;

01‘

Ill-proud.

”um

tan a»

�W:
m nasty-nu

In»
us than) ”tuna at can ulsive “can,“ nun“.
1951
‘0
1.
the
am
"in
you
wt“ mu:
but“! dull.
1953
1111““
1:
3%
OM.
till
mum
Cum
m
a:
In
nun-Mn
I
“mung a. mm“
but“: u
«um-«aw

“quanta

and

(2‘!

«mum "um. yummy-.usum pmmhum
with
9.! rum“ to it. ”an"
a tum-cu, mam
am£711.10}.
In. matey. u: putat“inmate.
um
a
ummm
not.
um “! mum ”um-arm

m

W
m
m

pm
What,
M
”hi?!
«um
9mm
u.

my.

u

«on: (m.

«an-nun an wars»)

and

on ”you.

may“.
“an:
(m§mum
3
{6.15)
manna-i
at
m sun
m mama
mam
In
M
[$3.00.
5)
M!
Morn!uul'
mm».
h
my».

M.

10

1'

auto), mo

1

Inn-ut- m mmm MW in an.»

nu- man

“than, at

1»

or

slum-a

mt «mi. m um. um m:

Mtuwnnmulmummnusuumnma

”in

to
m am”. no
‘50
.‘IUIIIII‘.
m mm
m

to

no

man“:

a»
Wt.
a. sum

W.
mouth...
at
m
mum:
m1”; m.
3W
”n
Hummu‘ut
mummy.“ mam
mm)...
Im

mum. mums-mm

m“.

�«uh»

am
”mm. mm

W
It
a.
mm

”(am
in mint”
an
with

an

approval.

by

m

I“ Wm. I'll mm (m twang
of
tho
«3:aura
“and m an a m
and
smut-tum
"can
to
un”. “any a“
mum
10'
11’
”MI-t!
H
MIN».
m
m.
“W‘- m.
manual.

01'

,0”th

“W
«mm»
up
mun-0mm wm‘mmrm

Win
m.mmmmutmmmmaumw
mm “mm mm tum.
an
My

Wu
ammo!
my
M1:

�mm.»

mm mm” Wm. ma.

u» 75
mutant. “than.
M

809

1.)

mun.“ NCMMaunm”

mun-hum. :amutmm,mmumn-

mmummumu-Mnmgmnunw
urn“ «on. at loan mm
a

tram“.

A

n.

punt:
a
m

m
ﬂWmﬂ.’
mu!"
My
«w
10”
m. mimmmuuwummmrtmm
(M10 1).

m

a

an

an
m rm

can can» at

nub-M

MW,

31

mm‘u'm.
mun-u
can",
mmmmun

mmmtmmmmmcm.
Mmunumummmmmmm
m,

mmunmuuﬂimm£ﬂmmmum

«moulmmmmmn‘m.

luv-awn

"moutammommmmm
«m (“an ”unwindmjlmmﬁMMnuc
arm.

sumac“- a:

.W
”1.1th

’

m

”mum mm m: ”"1qu m

m.mumnumum
twimmmmladumlmh Mm“
tutu-nonhuman...

�~6-

m

m
«and. “mum. mm mum.
muzm
man“! u a. mum“
mun.
m
“to
mu!“
«man.
m.
m
Wm
and

m

W
«um. W a mwnm
MW! mom-cu «Mum.

hunt“: a

m

naut- m:

am {m nun
madam-awn.

3-

u mzmcux 9mm. in "an“
clan-um
with“
‘mum
a
man"
m
”unsung. nth-uh m. m a manually umuu‘
an.
1mm" a damn. maﬁa him no» «upta!” an than mm ”min“. a.
an mint!”
It“ my.“ to “a mm. It a. Mutual mm»
sh
1).
(mu
I. mum a
m “noun“ a»
15
:1
: «mu Mutual W13, Wm m can a:
“cu-"um
Mmcuonhm
untoti!
it“
m
mitt” mu.Wt!
unhamm mun 1W. m. m m “C (“.1 ma)

W

M
m: m

m\mum.

m

(u.h)vmmmzcmmnumsuu
“lam

(9.2m)mlmtmmttwmm1muum
(mu

1).

can a M m

-.................

Inuit“ M hum“ Inna”
At “a
an hr no Mu!
to
of
«a mum ”an“ m 1m
nun"

«am
W.

Wt.

”at.

�-7roaovurud, Inch xnyrcvcd, anyrnvué or unimpravod. 2h.
tunidou#u a: roauvorod and tuck suyrovud :ntaugu It. a1;ntltc:ntly

rttusni ‘roup (2‘31. 3). _81: pnt1¢ntu, ‘11 in ‘hu
uncapﬁtnnt grin», war. ratod a. r¢iivttlda 2h; Inaptt‘l $13»
luwnr in tpu

ghargas curt guru clonal: unnaaintid with rttunnl 0r ataecnu

tinn:tstn ct truaﬁntut 1: ﬁt: tif‘lﬂl gran».
,

tibia

3

about hora

”oaanwnochoou In”- a-

�o.-

W:man um «an»

m.

mm ”cum
(8.13.13)
1:
mn mm
mus-nu m was“
at «cm tum w W mum“: swans/u in m
«MCI hr at In,” ‘0 ”am“: What. It
«no»: «o W” a» u a Wumanm
man: ”an” no "in. man" than M“ m
01ml: mu. m m "an 1- mm»: and am»
nu

and

‘

tun Chou n. :9: «mm In «4 WM nu- main"

Mm.

"jmmrmummmmum
tuning!
In:
a
an
mm“ “am.
«mm m
:3
at
many“.
WV
“Wm:
W
W
am...
m nunu' mun: run-u am»:
“an“...
it“ mum. Wot, Wham: at um
“Wumumrmmomummlm.
_

3

a
or

Mmmﬁdthntmtmumuth
only
a:
no
«m
m
«mm. am (”my ”MW
nu haul mm to» «awn rnn m mum. (that
:11 than
Mun-010.
11

tar
to”
am» an.“ union.
a. mum. must). maul for main”

gnu-ut-

3W m

W

with.“ m an at“: «comm an ”on.” at
hat. my tutu-hm a. M It 0mm in: the inﬂux.
«tar
making.
a
I:
oats-uh
apnea”
m
mm ”mm. at m «apt-nu M m Mm“ ta

W

�.,.
o-t
for
mun!” “arm unman- Willi."

W.
immune «am.
«mm "sun“
a mum: ”about! mm W “and“
”an” m “uni“
Md trams
In“ «m that «um run want. it“ mun-mu
cum on tonal in “ms my an an
”can“:
rip-ﬂout
m
man.
a
am.
than to

in

that
to

0,9,16,17,31).

by ham

nutty

as:

in
part

or

«If

and

at

tnn
um
In»
em
nun“
m,
um“- tram”:

m:

a:
at:
pint“:
mu
u
mm
_muauy '1» m1: mm pun-m u ﬁrm-pond
a» mum: of pun-Wm m Mm to tutu.
at um am." (9):
3
c:
“up“
m
n
an:
mania;
m
imam
103
an
WC
”In.
m1” ”um
My
W1”
Morn). In Win than” m m It“. On nut”,
1: What for am). ”an mu- 1». but
mull
«a
tun-tum
mu». an mm m wan-tum «mu
magma «at «mm m 0W1" than” «3
and
it an m ”lam:
”nut
mm“. 1mon
a» £01m m,
«rattan.- an Main,
“158., I: 1 an aim am WM‘ :‘u um um man
an luv. u. mum".
than
mania-1:
nun".
why In” ion in
in
mam: 9mm.” pm mm:
“noun, mu u“
Mm mun

ﬂ.“ ”amino

m:
W

mt

um

m
m
mm
Mu$uumtumnhtumumssttmldh

M11.

�«~10!-

Pnrhapa

yntitnﬂ

It

Into important than atthgr tiiitada or tun

the

partltttrint

in in» (tutor ct conuiltonuy

a: attitudou. _Klavuau g§_g;.. (17) hit. rayur‘id thtt yuuus
rOltdtlﬁ puynhtttrtltl wi‘h yuywhcunnlrttannrzinﬂation.
£r¢q303ilr hurt IBIBVIrthl. ttiiiudtu tuunrd :cnntto tiarapy
tud at: unhtvultn‘ dbauﬁ proucrihtn: such trtn‘uint. In tn:
patient study that. Hurt Ina: indiou‘tonu ﬁhnt rotcrrnl tor
tonvu1t$v3 tiara»: In: not ‘3. irao"ahotaa at the r¢n1dout
phynactnu but in. and. gnlr.tt‘cr conaidwrublo prasuurc by
:éutntuﬁruttvu and nursing ptrnonuul.
A raetut atndy hr 1.31:: and Lntuavtta (15) a: uﬁatt‘
‘36 ﬁuvironasnttl tna£ura I‘lﬁtiﬂﬁcd with rut-tral for drug
iburuyy 1: thin hmupltal doncmaﬁrntnd 1ht$ ti. pnyuhtiﬁrtlt's
tolurnntc {at dilﬁurhod buhavior nun ﬁlth htthﬂr tbs: thu‘ a:
unrsau gal athor pornonnal. Iroquautzr $ho rasidont pirttutun
placid : prontuu an htlpiu¢ tum patAnnt nadir: hit uninviur
without rciart ta InimittIGrtyr. L ttnilcr ahltrvttton wt.
and. by aubthaa and lanai (21) gun by xlawaau (17) ch. fauna

an 'p-mmtruu was“;

:-

mums

nu mummy.”

tutu unusually rcluatnut to ada awn; shmrnpr'. Such ;tt1tuIOI
:11 ha away-:Id ta F‘ﬁiiﬂtl cashor ovurtly If sartrtly. aneh
ahanrvlﬁtomn rntntnrat tbs tiadtnas w: Pnannnnlck. 91u1$: and
Litiln (18) that ‘duaptso prostticisanu by clsnlaina; thtt
that: maturtsco 1n tinny: til tndtvidunl pnﬁitut. clanaatnnl,
t; tact at; b. I. crawl: nannitﬁad in a pnr‘taulnr psywhtntrio

�«v11.»

rental at $halnht, thu‘ tbs pl‘SOQt'o «instant: tad troutucnt an Itrguly prudotorntn¢d.‘
2h. 'tnltut hat. would nuggnnt that tn. paychtntrstt'u
3:51thtat attitudo Qoward ‘rantnout 10 not . caunrul n‘titado
but. :- "um to th- ‘uew. dunno" a: tu ”no“ u

hinuult. 1h. pnyuhtn$tgc roatdant Iroquuutlr ha: 1:1: dittitulty
.1: newt-gang Imumtwy tu- n In“ «In: M that. It“
in tudoalatvo than at sing: it ﬂlkiil 3 51-31.: trustncnt
roturral £0? a putiant who 1. cultnrtlxr unr- 1130 hxnuult.
1h. finding: taut ub3n¢£oru to cauvnlnlvt titrnpy sure
gown otttn ditchnrgod tron in. h¢0p1¢I1 g. clintg‘lzy untupruvga 1n countltou‘ with privioul thnarvnﬁloul (1). ccwdou
(7) eluutttcc objector: int. tun untoxorioo . pcorly orxau‘cd
c‘tatunte nubjoctu who uttarod raatatunao to it. tra:tn¢nt
tud rucpaniud wi‘h elintanl ll,fﬂ?lﬂiu%3 lad a tottor ariastoi
group vb. dbjcetnd $0 troutnont on ta uftt‘udtanl hula:
e131u$u¢ §hu7 '1’. ‘not in lﬁbd it than“. Ibis lttinr group

rutrtctnry to £30 Glitteal bnncltta at tho tr0&amp;ﬁuont.
Alntc‘ :11 at the patient: in thc rnrtlnl urcnp of tha prtuuut
t‘udy ecnld ho alcnaittud tn :5. l‘tior crimp.
n. in “mug ﬁhﬁ wu$ .1 tin nation“ who to!!!“
ccnvulaivu traninult v.9. praguou‘ﬁoally pour acluatsut It!
eonvnlulvu tr::iu¢nt. In yrtvio‘l-utndaol (2.10.11) v. hnvo
than: this tho incident. at ruttugs a! 1nprovuucu$ :t
dilthnrg. in runn3, vulluoducutnd, luv 3 0:01. pattuats van
wort

l

�smut-mu:

1.“
ma
m
In»,
u
«and.
mm

tu-nmmumdmy
aWnuu-u.
of
for
'mn‘

”an”
m WMSmmMmmpmsnuuun‘
Wu
plant: m «0 mm

at 9mm.
mm
«My
«I
In
mu mm: m1” Mm u «u
nu
in 1m: max: round 1mm a.

main

”u

ma. a» "051m “mm It“ amt!“ W ”and.”
at
m...
u m m mun. m mum:
u
but.”

m:
amomunumcmumxum

w.
muxmm

«am» a! punt-m: mm. m mm an: a:
In

3.70.1..th Win-It W his «1mm-

». 3m macaw an «man u .mm.

’

'

�m:u

m

at a

mum immun- a

:4»:me

trauma

W.

m

‘

"nun

u wanna train»
“My
“I
nutnmhﬁqlul
it“
m
mm
um
to
at
at
m
h
"in“
“at
ammu» “an”
75
at
m
mulls"
1mm“
mm
"1W7 ”um mm a: ”mun" that” "(not
wan-nu mm a m in: mm x: a pmmWth-r
«mm mums“.
Ma nun“, m mu. hm» mm m m
1
um um- ” u- «mm In“ m: ﬂu m an
0:
no
lmhuml
«mm mun"- Mm._
”who“ m “m! u m
m
u
”nun
m.
n» mm
alumni u nun-m.
m. m
ht «mum a mom... a: mantra mm 1:
of
attitudinI.
“an!“ m 1m“
”3mm.
W
and
by
“but m ”in“ law.
at

‘

th-

m

mu

m
m

um

‘

�um:
Inn: 13:. lingaﬁaau
Asttptanaa
ﬁctuaul

t!

to.)

13

19.1

II¢I ﬁlttlralu.
(ﬂunuinalnd

3 M)

p

‘10.!

:.s
'

and

«‘1

I’aonr:

¢
.

Ur Irony

11.6
13.7

83.1
37.1

8.:

«10.9

1.9

1.2

am

.015

�ﬁll-III

3mm» nag-nu h In“

3m
Wm Imam:
tutu-not

W

1

um

a

(151)

(R6)

13

t (m)

h

15

I: It“; ,
"‘

"'

‘1...

(w)

(an

15

o

(M)
(o)

�1’ " ‘*‘13

P

"‘

~05

�1.
“1-,.

a.
3.
‘0

5.

6.

nu, I"

.“um. ‘ﬁ’.
mm. 3-1..

m0, M! m,

M‘;

‘95,.

W13
My
.W.

ﬂ“.mg 3.:

”M,
1.3.“:
m “on,
3:30;

at um, la

1.3.1”; 1m;
m.
3.1.,
mm, 1., hum“.

W,

".1

11‘

£0.15,

mm»

Wu
m.

W.

.inﬁp

1’5“;

m‘g 'o't,‘fog

W

mm, 1.3.. on... 3.3..

2.:
am.
um
1950.
551.6“.
3;
3.3. m an», x... can
mm, 3.3.,
cam-paramount). ¢Wmiﬁit a: ”an” m
“on ”hum he ”nun”. ars-inn. 1:: Wk“.
’03.. N “am. ’0'. (“'o). m
'.g
.

m,

:-

..

0mm m...

W;3;!”

“‘13 6h.

m,
1.8.:
am.

’¢

m;

16.

Mg

1”.

wax:
m;

30,-;

'05.;

up”:

1939.

’5'. C“ In“. ‘o'cl

3‘1!

1”:

m. a:

W”
8.9"

M m, '0!

'0’
M
"1“.»
"“
m;

m. m 1,5,.

M

in. ma-

‘G'I.

In“, ‘0'. I“
Shh)“. 1!“.

7

4

*

*

W4,

g.
m.

�at.
11.

m,

3.3...

hawk.

It.

10 816, 195?.

nu.

m m, 3.:

m
.

Wm.

w.
M.

an run, In
,1:
“S.
to”.
mm...
2.2;...
'11.:
In...
«a
I.
«mot,
rug.
1!“.
m: I”,
3.3.: Mm. at can mum»
mm. a. «a
1.1...

hunk.

m
mu,“can a train“ «W.

ma
m.
mm.
Km.
and

u.‘

17.

1..
1!.

3;.

n
0.33.! "at: “um“, twain-nun and m
must.
mcmwummm
hm.

W”

um, um.
mm... 3.3.:
111,
m:
an.” 19“.
a.
1..
1.:
m
mm,
mu.
Wk,

tam-u. 5.3.;

m:

I...

1".- 1,5,.
woman, n. on mu. 3.»...

w.
W,

m..
“W.
IO.
1.1.
was... m kn. Ian
”5‘38’j 1,5‘0
m”...
a. mm
mu»
3”.

'

In.

1:!

m,

1’s‘a

I.

and

M...

m:

g:

“WW

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2854">
                <text>Sociopsychological characteristics of patients who refuse convulsive therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1961 Feb; 132:153-7.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2855">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2856">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-54-020</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2857">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2858">
                <text>Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2859">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2860">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2861">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. Reprint from THE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE Vol. 132, N0. 2 February, 1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2862">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2863">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74488">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81049">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87610">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94171">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6746" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6546">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/10dd96ea03d444a3545ca7a104bdf5fe.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a67bc54ff65c228d90099b2591e160d9</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107151">
                    <text>SOCIAL FACTORS AND COMMUNICATION IN PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS

I:
11:

III:

From

Pollack Ph.D.

Choice and Results of Therapy

-

Duration of Hospitalization and Diagnosis

- Robert

Observations in an Interview Setting

- Joseph Jaffe

Max

L. Kahn Ph.D.

.

M.D.

the Department or Murmantal Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

L.I. , NJ.

Presented October 19, 1958,

at Hillside Hospital.

�III:

9-29-58

Social Factors and Commmication in Psychiatric Patients
1: Choice and Results of Therapy
Recent investigations by Hollingshead, Redlich, Frank, Levinson
and others have indicated a

relation

between

social class and

psychiatric disorder with respect to type and incidence of mental

illness, selection

be present

and maintenance of treatment and therapeutic outcome.

report is concerned with the role of social factors in the

.

selection and efﬁcacy of therapy in Hillside Hospital.
me most intensive analysis of the relationship of social class to
mental

illness has

been recently reported by Hollingshead, Redlich and

their coworkers. In their studies the population of New Haven was
divided into five social classes on the basis of weighted criteria or
education, occupation and place of residence. or the residents who were
under psychiatric care, those from the upper social classes were more

frequently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or

custodial care

was more

comm among the lower classes. Of the

psychotherapies, psychoanalysis was entirely restricted to the We upper
groups. Social class was the predominant determinant of the type of

treatment selected even when the diagnosis was held constant. They
summarize

their observations as follows: I'....

it

is found that

and
does
treatment
not depend on psychological
medical determinants

alone, but on the status position of the patient as well. Psychotherapeuﬁc

in disproportionately high degree to the upper social
data of this study would seem to indicate that most

methods are, applied

levels.

The

�in a setting where the background of the
patient is similar to that of the therapist."
It is possible, however, to relate the results obtained from these
commity studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial
psychotherapy takes place

resources or the extent and type of treatment
more

critical test of the

facilities available.

A

importance of social factors affecting choice

of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic tecrmiques
and services are

available to

all patients, regardless

of their ability

to pay.

is

at Hillside Hospital. the of the main
criteria for accepting patients is their “ability to participate
profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with
organic therapies available when needed. Thus a patient is seen in
This requirement

met

regular therapeutic sessions throughout his hospital stay even

when

undergoing a course of caustic therapy. The average length of hospital

stay

is six

months, with some

The purpose

patients remaining from

of the present report

is

12

to 16 months.

to smnmarize the relation

factors of age, education, place of birth, and social
attitude (as measured by the California F scale) to the selection or
between the

treatment and the ratings of improvement at time of discharge in this
environment.

muons
1957 was

The

entire in-patient adult population of

studied. This consisted of

171

patients,

March 7,

57 men and 111; women ,

ranging in age from 16 to 68 years, with a mean of 35 years.

�Procedure: The patients were tested with a ten-item modification

of the California F scale suggested by Levinson. The

F

scale is a

questionnaire which has been related to such factors as authoritarianism,
acquiescence, ethnocentrism and

rigidity.

The

patient reads ten

statements and indicates whether he agrees or disagrees with each
statement and to what extent.
from one to seven and the

The

score given for each item ranges

total score range is

10

to 70.

The

greater

the agreement the higher the score obtained. The statements themselves

are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped expressions. For example, one
of the statements
would be

is: "If

people would talk less and work more, everybody

better off."

Choice of Therapy:

will first take up the relation of these social and psychological
factors to selection for treatment. During the period of this study,
(Table I) approximately one-third of the patients received convulsive
The
small
with
and
two-thirds
treated
psychotherapy
were
only.
therapy
group of patients who received insulin coma and drug therapies are not
We

represented on the slide.

When compared

to psychotherapy patients, the

convulsive group were older, had fewer years of education

not completed grade school

also had a higher

F

-

-

many had

and were frequently foreign born.

They

score, which indicates that these patients tended

to agree with social stereotypes.
At this time, the psychiatric residents and their supervisors
were also tested. Their average F score was 21.8 with a mean age of
thus more closely approximating the psychotherapy group than the

33 .9.

�electroshock group.
This figure has dealt with group averages for each of the factors
mentioned. There was however marked

at
the patients is

variability within each of the

groups, with patients

each end of a wide range.

grouping

shown

group with reSpect to length of

convulsive therapy.

As

One method

in the analysis of the electroshock
hospitalization prior to receiving

illustrated in the next table

electroshock patients were divided into three groups:
were
and

(Table

II),

the

1) those who

after admission, 2) between three
after six months. There is a definite correlation

treated within three
six months, and 3)

of sub-

months

prior to convulsive therapy and F score, age,
education and birthplace. It is of interest that there is a gradient
for each of the social factors. As a group the patients referred for
between length of stay

convulsive therapy

after six

months of

hospitalization are most similar

to the psychotherapy patients with respect to each of the factors.
Che

set of data not

shown

in the slide is the ratio of male to

female patients referred for somatic therapy during each of these

hospitalization periods. Although the ratio of females to males in
the hospital population is two to one, hh per cent of the patients in
the group treated within three months were male.

In the group

hospitalized for six months prior to convulsive therapy, however, only
7

per cent are males. Thus, male patients are referred for electroshock

earlier in their hospital stay than
As

patients.
expected, a larger proportion of depressed patients
female

~ 52

cent - received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.

per
To

�-5.
control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the psychotic
depression patients were subdivided into those

who

received electroshock

and those who were given psychotherapy alone.

The

results are

the next slide (Table

III).

While the two groups are comparable

age and education, the electroshock
mean F

shown

in

for

patients had a significantly higher

score and a higher percentage were foreign born. Thus,

it may

that persons classified as having a psychotic depression are not
necessarily referred for electroshock because they are older or less
educated, but rather that they come from cultural backgrounds that are
be

more commonly

associated with psychologic processes that

make

successful

in the psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapeutic
relationship less likely. These findings are consistent with previous
studies which have shown that patient-therapist differences in systems
communication

of values

may hamper

Redlich note:

"We

therapeutic relationship.

As

Hollingshead and

are not sure what attributes a good patient must have,

but they include sensitivity, intelligence, Social and intellectual
standards similar to the psychiatrist‘s, a will to

do

desire to improve one's personality and status in

life,

attractiveness and charm. Rarely will such standards

one's best, a
youth,

be admitted by

psychiatrists. On the contrary, psychiatrists claim that the selection
for treatment is based on purely psychiatric criteria....."
Results of Therapy:

Social factors are as significantly related to treatment result
as they are to treatment selection.

hospital treatment

on

To

the 171 patients,

analyze the effects of the
we

selected the discharge

�evaluation as the criterion of improvement. At time of discharge a

patient is classified in

one of four

categories: recovered,

much

improved, improved or unimproved.

relation of social factors to the discharge evaluations is
presented in the next slide (Table IV). There is a definite, almost
The

linear relationship, between the improvement rating and these four
social factors. The recovered group of patients had the highest F
scores, were oldest, least educated and
of foreign

birth. In contrast,

showed the

highest incidence

the unimproved group had the lowest F

scores, were younger and better educated - almost all having gone to
college - and were primarily native~born.

for patients treated with convulsive therapy
the improvement ratings parallel those for the total population.

Analyzing the data

(Table V)

Again, the recovered group had the highest mean F scores, was the oldest,
most poorly educated with the highest incidence of foreign

birth.

The

illustrates the relation of these observations

next slide (Table VI)

to time of referral for treatment. Within the electroshock group
67

per cent of those

who were

treated early in the course of

hoSpitalization were rated as recovered or
those treated

after six

these two groups.
were more

much improved, whereas

months only 30 per cent were

As was

noted

earlier, patients in this latter

similar to the psychotherapy group

It is

classified in

WEUh

respect to these

not surprising, therefore, that they were
treated with somatotheragy only after an extensive course of

social factors.

psychotherapy.

group

�.7In summary, the observations that social factors are related to
type of therapy received as well as therapeutic outcome are consistent

with the studies of Hollingshead, Redlich and their coaworkers.

their findings in demonstrating
that these factors are also significant in a hospital setting where
where
and
selection
of
not
therapeutic
criterion
to
a
is
pay
ability
all forms of therapy are equally available to the entire population.

Furthermore, the present studies extenii

While

the relation between social factors and treatment selection

are clear, and are consistent with previous findings, the relation of
these factors to improvement ratings appears paradoxical.
observations that those patients with high
and

less educated,

more

F

scores,

The

who were

older

often received convulsive therapy and were

discharged more frequently as recovered are consistent with the results

reported in 1956 in a follow-up study of Hillside Hospital patients
conducted by Rachlin, Goldman, Lurie, Gurvitz and Rachlin.

It is

possible that the differences in communication between therapist
patient that result in referral for convulsive therapy may also
influence the discharge rating. Thus,

Kahn and

and

Fink have previously

to denial, evasion,
and
benefit
most
receive
to
and
of
cliches
use
are
likely
stereotypy
from electroshock. Such language patterns appear more frequent in
shown

that verbally

uncommunicative persons, prone

persons in the lower socioeconomic groups. Because of the differences

therapist and patient, the therapist may set different criteria
for improvement for the older less educated patients than he does for

between

the young, sophisticated ones,

�class patient

The lower

may

also set goals for himself that are

The
from
class
patient's
the
different
patient.
upper
qualitatively
aspirations for himself and the therapist's expectancy for the patient
of
time
of
hospital
improvement
at
Ratings
an
interactive
are
process.

discharge are relative in that they refer to a baseline of premorbid
functioning. Thus the rating of recovered is defined as, "the reasonable

expectation that the patient will be able to return to his community
and function as

well, or better, than

he did before he became

ill."

therapist's perception of the patient's premorbid functioning may
be influenced by the distance between his value system and that of
the patient and both influenced by their social class. ‘The greater
the social distance between therapist and patient the less rigorous
the requirements for behavioral change. Fer example, for older, lower
class patients, ability to resume work may loom as the major criterion
The

of improvement. For the upper class patient work adjustment
only one of a

may be

host of criteria, including such intangibles as work

gratification, ease of sociability, etc..
This presentation has dealt with a few of the relationships
between social factors and psychiatric treatment in a voluntary,
psychotherapeutically-oriented hospital. The other speakers will
deal with

many

of the questions

left

unanswered

in this report.

�THERAPY SELECTION

F

Score

Yrs. of
Education

Foreign

gMeanz

Age
{Mean}

Electroshock
(Ii-57)

14306

’40.3

11-2

26%

Psychotherapy

36.1;

32.6

11.8

9%

Groggs

(Na102)

SMean)

%

Born

�.10TABLE

II

LENGTH OF HOSPITALIZATION PRIOR TO
ADMINISTRATION OF ELEBTROSHOCK

F Score
gMeanz

Groygs

Less than

3

{N-Bh)
3

mos.

to 6 mos.

(N-IO)

More

than 6 mos.

(N~13)

Age
(Mean!

Yrs. of
Education
Ween!

%

ForeignBorn

148.3

M45

10.1

1:173

he. 7

39.8

11.7

30%

32.9

29.5

13.14

�-11TABLE

III

SELECTION OF THERAPY IN PATIENTS
WITH PSYCHOTIC DEPRESSION

Yrs. of
Education

Foreign—
Born

F Score
SMean!

Age
SMean)

Electroahock
(N'Bl)

50.3

h8.6

10.6

1:253

Psychotherapy

h1.0

h7.6

10.0

2h%

GrouEs

(n-29)

SMean)___

%

�-12TABLE

:1

SOCIAL FACTORS AND DISCHARGE EVALUATION

F Score
SMean)

Age
gMean)

Yrs. of
Education
gMeanz

1 ForeignBonn

h2.9

Mus

10.7

Much Improved

39.0

35.6

11.2

22%

Improved

36.1

31.2

11.2

16%

31.2

13.2

11%

Recovered

h1%

(N-17 )

(n-82)

(N'63)

Uhimproved

(n-9)

31.1

�-13TABLE V

DISCHARGE EVKLUATION IN CONVULSIVE THERAPY

Yrs.‘of

F Score
sMeanz

Age
SMeanz

Education

%

Foreign-

SMeanz

Born

53.1

51.6

9.u

50%

(N-26)

h2.0

h3.8

10.6

35%

Improved and
unimproved
(Ni23)

39.7

32.3

12.3

12%

Recovered
(N-B)

Much Improved

�-m-

M
TABLE VI

LENGTH OF HOSPITALIZATION PRIOR TO ELECTROSHOCK
AND DISCHARGE EVALUATION

Recovered

Much

8:

Iﬂroved

Improved
U

raved

Groggs

Less than

32%

6 mos.

70%

30%

than 6 mos.

31%

59%

(n-Bh)
3

to

ms.

68%

3

(N-lO)

More

(N-13)

&amp;

�III:

9-29-58

-15-

Social Factors and Communication in Psychiatric Patients

II: Duration of Hospitalization

and Diagnosis

Just heard a presentation of factors associated with the
selection and results of treatments. I will next conéider the relation
You have

of these factors to length of hospitalization and to diagnosis.

It is

obvious that the length of time a patient stays in a mental

hospital is related to the particular function and philosophy of the
institution. In an institution such as Hillside Hospital which admits
only voluntary patients and emphasizes psychoanalytically oriented psychothe
In
limited.
particular
of
is
the
hospitalization
length
therapy,
montthin
16
from
complete
to
one
was
the
studied
the
population
range
L

months.
of
six
over
with
an
stay
slightly
average
hospital,

Several factors can.be postulated which might be related to the
duration of hospitalization. Since

it commonly takes less

time to produce

behavioral change with convulsive therapy than with psychotherapy, one
would expect to

find that the consulsive therapy patients are kept in the

hospital for the shortest period while the psychotherapy patients are here
longer. The data, as presented in Table VII, shows no significant difference
between the two groups.

If

anything, there

is a slight

tendency for

psychotherapy patients at Hillside to be institutionalized for the shorter

period.
A

second possible factor

is the severity of the patient's illness.

be
who
will
necessarily
more
intractable
those
are
that
patients
It
maintained in the hospital further to receive additional treatment.
Examination
demonstrates
shown
Table
in
VIII,
the
however,
as
data,
of
those
that while
patients hospitalized for the shortest period do have
may

be

�Much
and
Improved,
Recovered
of
of
ratings
incidence
discharge
a higher
and
chance
are not significant.
variation
within
a
differences
are
the

In the Hillside followhup study of Rachlin
there was no relationship

EELEE'

it

was

also found that

between discharge evaluation and length of time

in the hospital.
On the basis of the data and discussion presented by Dr. Pollack,
be
should
a relationship
there
that
hypothesis
advance
the
further
can

we

of
and
duration
hospitalization.
the
background
social
patient's
we
oriented
psychotherapy
psychoanalytically
With Hillside's stress on
would expect that those patients who are most like the therapists with regard
between a

to these factors.would be kept

The
the
period.
for
longest
the
in
hospital

data is presented in Table IX. Patients

shortest

who were

period had the highest F scores, were

hospitalized for the

oldest, had the fewest

Conversely,
born.
of
native
and
smallest
the
percentage
education
of
years
F
the
lowest
had
the
scores,
the
who
longest
the
in
hospital
were
those
of
and
smallest
the
percentage
education
of
most
years
youngest ages, the

foreign born. These differences are statistically significant.
In Table X a similar analysis is shown for only those patients
receiving electroshock.

Again, each of these factors

is related to duration

of hospitalization.
The same

results are obtained

psychotherapy only

is

when

the data of those patients receiving

While
XI.
shown
Table
in
as
analyzed separately,

F
low
have
Pollack
Dr.
scores, are
indicated,
as
these patients as a group,

electroshock
the
than
born
and
native
more
education
have
more
younger,

patients, there is

still

a significant difference within the group in the

the
time
in
hospital.
of
the
to
length
according
direction
predicted

�These same relationships of

social factors to hospitalization are

found even when the patients were subdivided according to

diagnosis. In Table XII the data is shown for the

in the hospital for each diagnostic group.

F

their final

score and months

The diagnoses were subdivided

into four major groups and include all but three patients in the population
studied. For each group there is a significant difference between those

in the hospital for the shortest and the longest periods, with those in
the longest having the lowest scores. Similar results are shown when the
data

is

analyzed

It is also

shown

for

each diagnostic group with respect to age (Table XIII).

for education (Table

schizophrenic patients

stay.

It

who were

who

XIV), with the exception of the

had about the same education

for each length of

should be noted, though, that many of the schizophrenic patients

here for ten months or more were quite young - around 16 or 17,

and so did not have the opportunity to receive education beyond the middle

of high school.
Analysis of place of

hospitalization is

shown

is associated with a

birth for
in Table

each diagnostic group and length of

XV.

marked decrease

Increase in length of hospitalization

in the

with the exception of the schizophrenics,

number

who

of foreign born, again

as a group, had very few such

persons.
The

previous tables have indicated that not only

is there

a significant

relation between each of the social factors studied and length of
hospitalization, but that there are large differences between the diagnostic
groups themselves, even when comparing patients with the same period of

hospitalization.
in Table

XVI.

The summary

It is

data comparing the diagnostic groups

is

shown

clear that patients diagnosed as involutional psychosis

�have the highest F scores, the

oldest ages, the least years of education,

highest incidence of foreign born. In contrast, the schizophrenics
have the lowest F scores, were the youngest, had the most education and the
and the

of foreign born. The manic-depressive and psychoneurotic
involutionals
the
to
closer
with
the
manic-depressive
between,
in
patients fell

least

number

like the schizophrenics.
relationship between these social factors

and the psychoneurotics most

This marked

and diagnosis

is not surprising. Certainly the relationship of age and diagnosis is an
established concept in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional disorders
and
What

names themselves have a chronological conndstion.

in dementia praecox the

is

unexpected, however,

is that

age should also be

related to the

and
that the
and
disorders,
psychoneurotic
of
manic-depressive
diagnosis
other social factors of education, place of birth and F score should

in
this hospital.
the
diagnostic
major
groups
differentiate
all
significantly
we have postulated two hypotheses to account for these relationships.
The first is based on the fact that persons from different social backgrounds
acquire different habitual
and expression.

modes

of adaptation and patterns of communication

Accordingly, under conditions of stress, damaged brain

function, or other etiological conditions associated with the onset of
mental illness, a person will show those behavior patterns or symptoms

his habitual patterns. Thus, a person from
background
communicate
in nonsverbal,
to
more
lower
apt
social
class
is
a
do
so in
to
more
while
class
people
likely
are
physical terms,
upper

which are of the same type as

ideational and verbal terms. Thus, anger

may be shown by

lower class

people by physical violence, while those from upper classes are more
and
Redlich
Hollingshead
exhortation
argument.
to
to
or
resort
likely

�-19-

have noted

that these differences

among

people of different classes lead

to different psychodynamic patterns in psychoanalytic terms. Thus, aggressive
and sexual behavior

behavior

variation

is

is restricted
among

more acceptable
among

to lower class parents, while such

the upper classes, lending to considerable

the different social classes in superego development.

Irish

Italian patients who were diagnosed
as schizophrenic in a V.A. Hospital, found significant differences in their
types of symptoms related to cultural differences in their family backgrounds.
Patients coming from Irish families in which active expression of emotions
Marvin Opler, studying

and

were frowned upon and with dominant over-protective mothers, were

passive,

compliant and withdrawn, and fearful of anything which might separate them
from the protection of the

hospital. Patients with Italian family backgrounds

that encouraged free expression of
showed

were

assaultive

and

emotion and were ruled by a dominant

destructive behavior, were difficult to

father,

manage and

rebellious against authority.
In a comparable study Miller and Swanson have also noted that

hospitalized schizophrenics exhibit significant social class difference

in symptomatology - lower class patients showing "motoric themes," while
middle class patients exhibit "conceptual or ruminative themes."
According to our hypothesis, then, we would expect

lower social levels would show symptoms

sensory or motor patterns.

Among

that persons

from

that are non-verbal, expressed in

such types of symptoms would be psychomotor

retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor, muteness, hysterical blindness or
paralysis. In this connection

it is noteworthy that hysterical

symptoms

have
been reported as
the army

far

men

more

frequent

among

enlisted

in

than

officers. In addition hysteria which was apparently so common in‘world.war
I was not nearly so notable in wbrld'war II, and, in fact, has been reported

�in the general population. This decrease, in our view, is
related to the general increase in educational level of the country as a
whole. If one finds a classical case of hysteria in New'York today, I

on the wane

Rican
be
immigrant
Puerto
the
in
likely
it
population who have the poorest socio-cultural background. (One cannot,
of course, ascribe the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom in sexual

will

understand that

matters;

has

it is

shown,

most

most

common

in

more

poorly educated people who, as Kinsey

are least inhibited sexually).

In the laboratories at Hillside Hospital the investigations of persons
with depressive psychoses have been more intensive.

we have

noted a

common

of
lack
characterized
hy
these
behavior
of
in
people,
premorbid
pattern
imagination, creativity and introspective capacity, and by conventionality
and general rigidity. Similar patterns have been noted in a series of

studies of such patients by other authors.
background, such as

that involving

little

we

or

believe that a poor cultural

no

education, spending early

and
cultural
is
environment,
meager
resources,
in
a
illiterate
largely
years
conducive to the development of such a personality pattern. When mentally
disordered, such persons tend to react with a repertoire of behavior patterns

consistent with their background which
A

we

second hypothesis concerning the

term depression.

relation of social factors to

and
between
do
the
with
has
interaction
patient
to
diagnosis
psychiatrist.

this hypothesis a diagnosis may not be based on an actual
how
of
the
reflection
extent
a
to
but
behavior
great
is
a
pattern,
objective
psychiatrist perceives or identifies the patient. It has been noted frequently
that patients with similar symptoms will be differently diagnosed and treated
depending on their social class. For example, we recently studied three

According to

patients

who were

admitted with similar symptoms of depression, anorexia and

�insomnia.
who was

All three were referred for convulsive therapy.

One woman,

62, born in Russia, of limited education with an F score of 70,

was diagnosed as

involutional melancholia.

this country, with

The second, aged hS, born

in

an F score of 53 and a high school education, was termed

manic-depressive, depressed. The third, aged hh, also born in this country,
with an F score of 33 and a college education, was diagnosed as psychoneurosis,

reactive depression.
In conclusion, in the Hillside Hospital population social factors of
age, education, birthplace and F score are significantly related to the

selection and results of treatment, length of hospitalization and diagnosis.
These findings

illustrate the

importance of social factors in affecting

language and communication patterns and the nature of the interaction

patient and therapist. Current data, both from our own laboratory
and as reported in the work of others, indicates that psychotherapy is most
likely to take place with those persons who most closely resemble the therapists

between

in terms of cultural background and communication pattern. In Hillside, with
its emphasis on psychotherapy, it is clear that patients who best meet this

criteria are also keptthe longest. This is true for either patients
receiving convulsive or psychotherapies alone, and for all diagnostic groups.
In the evaluation of clinical improvement there may well be different
expectancies towards patients in terms of these social factors.
with
may

little

In a person

education and different modes of expression than ourselves,

we

regard, for example, the manifestation of denial as improvement. But

in a patient

much

like ourselves in cultural background, the

denial will be regarded as a defense and the patient

is

showing of

considered unimproved.

patient,himself, may have different expectancies not only in terms of
the type of psychiatric treatment, but for what constitutes improvement as well.

The

�believe also that the attitude of the patient's family may be crucial
in both the patient's and therapist's conception of what constitutes

we

improvement.

relation between social factors and diagnosis was interpreted in
affects
background
cultural
one's
that
indicated
was
First
ways.
it
The

two

the type and

and
accordingly
and
communication,
of
expression
symbolic
pattern

the possible type of

symptoms

a diagnostic statement

behavior pattern.

patient

and

is not

Rather,

it

that will be

shown.

Secondly,

we

believe that

simply an objective evaluation of a given

is

a reflection of the interaction of the

psychiatrist in relation to their respective cultural backgrounds

and modes of communication.

It is

between
mind
the
while
relationship
that
in
to
keep
important

social factors and the psychiatric aspects described is probably applicable
as a generalized principle, the specific findings may vary in different
For example, in a study using the F score at the

settings or institutions.

Boston Psychopathic Hospital, the same relationship to type of treatment
was noted as

in our report,

i.e.,

the electroshock patients had higher

scores than those receiving psychotherapy.

patients there, however,
patients

is

was higher than

Since the average score of the

at Hillside, their psychotherapy

had the same mean score as our electroshock cases.

Another example

the finding of Hollingshead and Redlich that schizophrenia

common

diagnosis proportionately

among

F

was a more

lower than upper classes, while at

Hillside the schizophrenics had the highest education. This discrepancy
two
of
the
in
composition
the
variation
be
accounted
by
for
can probably
middle
from
drawn
the
largely
being
the
Hillside
patients
populations,
lower
classes.
social
few
from
the
or
with
upper
relatively
groups

�-23-

In Hillside the diagnosis of schizophrenia

may

indicate an "interesting"

same
diagnosis
the
population
while
State
Hospital
in
a
patient,

may

represent a "hopeless" patient.

It

be
tested
to
studies
these
by
raised
remains for the hypotheses

In
involved.
the
psychological
of
processes
studies
and for further
interaction.
communicative
of
studies
on
been
working
have
particular we
Some

Dr.

of the details

Jaffe.

and findings of

this

work

will next be presented by

�DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION AND TYPE OF TREATMENT

in Ho§ita1

Months

Treatment Grog-pa

1

-

5

6

-

9

10 or more

Electroshock (S?)

26%

30%

M453

Psychotherapy (102)

32%

he}!

25%

" 5.73
df " 2

(3112

p

-

N.S.

�-25TABLE

VIII

DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION AND DISCHARGE EVALUATION

Discharge Evaluation
Months

in

Hoggital

Recovered or
Much Iggroved

Improved or

raved
EM

1-5 (h9)

69%

31%

6-9

55%

15%

52%

148%

(624)

10 or

more (58)

Chi2

df

p

-

3-83
2

N.S.

�- 26..
TABLE IX

DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION AND F SCORE, AGE, EDUCATION
AND PLACE OF BIRTH

in Hogi‘bal

Months

91-192

-

9
{bl-6h}

10 or more

133.9

10.5

31.0

Mean
Age

145-5

32-5

27 .9

Years
Education

10.0

11.9

12.8

W

19%

10%

1

ean
F Score

M

Mean

5 Foreign Born

-

5

6

ski-582

�-27TABLE X

DURATION OF HDSPITALIZATION AND

F SCORE, AGE, EDUCATION

AND

PLACE OF BIRTH IN PATIENTS RECEIVING ELECTROSHOCK

Months

in Hogaital

-5
pm 52

6

Mean
F Score

58.2

h5.6

3h.9

Mean
Age

51.7

h2.2

32.1

6.5

12.3

13.2

67%

2h%

16%

1

Mean.Years

Education

%

Foreign

Born

-

9
551-172

10 or more
531-25 2

�DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION AND F SCORE, AGE, EDUCATION
AND PLACE OF BIRTH IN PATIENTS RECEIVING PSYCHOTHERAPY ONLY

in HogEital

Months
1

-

S

6

-

10 or more
gN-262

SN‘BB}

9
SN-hB!

Mean
F Score

h0.2

38.6

27.8

Mean
Age

[‘3 c 2

29 o 1

2,4 0 8

11.1;

11.7

12.1:

Mean Years

Education

%

Foreign

Born

30%

16%

8%

�W
TABLE

MEAN

F

XII

OF
DURATION
TO
ACCORDING
GROUPS
DIAGNOSTIC
SCORES FOR

HOSPITALIZATION

Months

Diagnostic

in Hoggital

3;;

L2;

58.2

50.9

35.0

Manic Depressive

h0.02

h6.1

33.1

Psychoneuroses

h0.05

36.6

36.1

Schizophrenia

36.3

38.5

27.6

Greg
Involutional Depression

10 or more

K

�-30TABLE

MEAN AGES FOR

XIII

DIAGNOSTIC GROUPS ACCORDING TO DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION

10 or more

Diggggstic Gregg

3L;§L

£1;;2_

Involutional Depression

58. 8

5h. 5

52. 3

Manic Depressive

h6.8

39.1

35.5

Psychoneuroses

141.0

27 .1

27.1

Schizophrenia

27.8

27.8

214. 1

�.31TABLE XIV

W

OF
DURATION
TO
ACCORDING
GROUPS
DIAGNOSTIC
FOR
EDUCATION
MEAN YEARS OF

HOSPITALIZATION

Months

in Hogaital
10 or more

1;;;§

51:113

7.1

9.6

16.0

11.0

11.7

12.3

Psychoneuroses

8.7

12.5

12.5

Schizophrenia

13.3

12.3

12.9

giggnostic Groggs

Involutional Dapression

Manic Depressive

�-3 2..
TABLE Lv

OF
DURATION
TO
ACCORDING
GROUPS
DIAGNOSTIC
BORN
FOR
FOREIGN
PERCENTAGE
HOSPITALIZATION

in Hogital

Months

Digestic

Grougs

_1__-_§

6

-

9

10

or more
0

Involutional Depression

57$

113%

Manic Depressive

39%

23%

0

Psychoneuroses

50%

19%

13%

Schizophrenia

10%

8%

12%

�TABLE XVI

DIAGNOSIS AND F SCORE. AGE: EDUCATION AND PLACE OF BIRTH

Dialysis
Involutional
Depression

Mean
F Score

'

Mean
Age

Mean Years

Education

%

Foreign

Born

{NI-21:2

Manic Depressive
(NI-322

Psycho-

' neuroses

Schizophrenia

(Iv-372

$31-68)

52.3

140.8

36.9

32.8

56.7

1:1.9

29.1;

26.1

8.9

11. 5

11. 9

12. 7

146%

26%

22%

10%

�-313-

Relationship:
Patient-Doctor
the
on
Effects of Social.Factors
Setting
Interview
Observations in an

illustrate
will
I
In this report

how

discussed
factors
the social

hypothesis
Our
interview.
clinical
the
in
ommunication
c
affect
morning
this
and
mmunicate,
can co

that this is

why

treatment.
results of psychiatric

and
choice
the
to
relevant
they are

One way

to test

would
hypothesis
such a

actual
an
in
events,
important
psychodynamically
that
he to demonstrate
such
as
age,
factors
to
related
significantly
are
setting,
interview

of
a
study
the
be
might
A
step
first
and.F
score.
education, nativity
communication
of
kind
the
of
representative
which
is
event,
defined
clearly
psychotherapy.
to
relevant
that is

The phenomenon

pattern.
communication
such
one
with
deals
This report
e—recording
tap
the
mentioned
explicitly
the
patient
no
whether
or
studied is
may bear upon
transaction
spontaneous
This
interview.
during an experimental
and
interviews
rimental
in
expe
develops
which
transference situation

t

the

well.
as
in psychotherapy
METHOD:

The

clinical

setting in

which the observations

we re made was an

initial

of
patients
edure
proc
screening
the
of
interview. This was part

interviews
All
hospital.
this
in
therapies
sive
convul
and
referred for drug
the
during
Psychiatry,
imental
Exper
of
Department
the
in
were performed
was
It
tests.
psychological
and
physiological
of
battery
week as a
to
asked
was
The
patient
and
patient.
doctor
the
of
the first meeting
was
procedure
unstructured
generally
and
a
about his difficulties,

tell

�.35followed. The purpose was to get an impression of the patient's communication

patterns,

and

to secure a tape recording of the interaction.

Several months ago,

that the interview

it was

noted that some patients mentioned the fact

was being tape—recorded, whereas

nothing about the procedure. Since that time,

recorded

this data at the conclusion of

I

other patients said

have

each session.

systematically
In addition, the

following experimental structure was purposely introduced.
A

Tanberg tape-recorder was prominently placed beside the desk

which the interview took place.

This instrument was turned on Just before

the patient entered the room, and was clearly in his line of vision.
was about

at

It

the level of the desk, at a distance of about seven feet from

the patient's chair. The red neon glow bulb, the revolving reels of tape,
and the operating noise of the machine could all be observed. An unconcealed
mire ran directly from the instrument, across the desk, to a microphone which
-

lay in clear view between doctor and patient. However, the interviewer
no mention of

by the

made

the recording set-up unless the subject was introduced verbally

patient.

OBSERV£IION33

Since

this experimental structure

have been recorded.
17

was

introduced, 31

initial

interviews

The

tape-recording was mentioned by 1h patients, while
others made no such observation. They will henceforth be referred to as

the "Mention" and

No

Mention" groups respectively.

a) Qualitative: The patients

variety of attitudes.

who

mentioned the recording expressed a

The most common was

curiosity, with inquiry as to the

purpose of the interview, and the use to which the recordings might be put.

�-36A

minority expressed overt suspicion, either refusing to proceed with the

interview for several minutes, or voicing their fears of humiliating or
incriminating uses which might be

did'nt

know

the room was bugged."

made
A

of the recordings.

One

patient said, "I

physician in this group of patients

requested that the recorder be turned off for a

moment so

that

he could ask a

question as a colleague, "off the record." After a spontaneous mention of the

to explore the attitude underlying the remark.

recording, an attempt was

made

This varied from definite

hostility

and suspicion, through mild objection and

uneasiness, to passive acceptance of the procedure. Only one patient expressed

delight, saying, "I'm glad this is being recorded,
In addition to these subjects

who

it's

like a confession."

explicitly mentioned the recording,

patient is included in the "Mention" group.
to the microphone, shook her head as

if

She

one mute

pointed to the recorder, then

to say "no," and covered her mouth

with her hand.

In the

"No

Mention" group, non-verbal recognition of the recording was

often apparent. Most of the patients looked repeatedly at the recorder and
microphone , sometimes
up

furtively. Several of

them

actually touched or picked

the microphone while speaking. I accompanied one patient back to the ward

following the interview, and while chatting in a lighter vein she asked
way, was

that all recorded?"

that the

ﬂNo-mention" group was aware of the recording.

"By

the

Thus there was considerable non-verbal evidence

Quantitative:
Quantitative data for the "Mention" and
Table-XVILIt

is apparent that the

group

"No—mention" groups

is seen in

explicitly remarked about the reabout 20 years. They were also better

who

cording were younger, on the average, by

educated, and with only a single exception were native born.

They had a lower

score on the F scale and I tended to spend more time with them. All the

differences between the groups are statistically significant;

�.37-

TABLE

MENTION

XVII

NO MENTION

53121:).

N=17)

26.7

h5.2

1h.1

p&lt;

.002

10.9

P&lt;:

~02

93

53

I&gt;&lt;:

.05

F SCORE

3h.1

11702

DURATION OF
INTERVIEW (minutes)

39.6

2900

AGE

(years)

EDUCATION
%

(years)

NATIVE BORN

p‘&lt;:’ .05

�DISCUSSION:

Using a

single objective index, 3:2. an overt statement about an

unexpected experimental procedure, two patterns emerge from

patients.

The group of

this

group of

subjects mentioning the recording have the

same

sociological characteristics as those patients from the total Hillside
Hospital population

are treated by psychotherapy alone. They are

who

less

younger, have some college education, are native born, and are

stereotyped in their attitudes. They mention the experimental procedure

in a challenging

way.

Gill,

Newman

and Redlich have described the anxiety-

producing effects of tape-recording psychiatric interviews. This group of

patients meet the stress by verbalization of their subjective reactions.
talk about it, ask questions, object, 222.
The group who do

not mention the recording have the

same

They

sociological

wharacteristics as those patients in the total Hillside Hospital population
who

are typically referred for electroshock

(i;g.

non-venaal therapy) or are

hospitalized for the shortest period. They are older, have at most a high
school education, are more likely to be foreign born, and are stereotyped

in their attitudes as measured by the

F

scale. These patients

the procedure overtly, although they notice
the doctor, whatever you

do

is justified

their compliance

and

what to say, but

I'll be glad to

it.

Their attitude

do

not question

is

"You

are

and should not be questioned."

In

vauiescence they resemble surgical patients who submit
themselves passively to treatment, neither resisting nor actively participating.
When asked to tell about themselves their attitude often is, "I don't know
The "Mention" group

They do

answer any questions you may ask."

display a different attitude toward the therapist.

not treat the physician's procedures as completely outside their

�-39-

verbalize their resistance, and express their negative
feelings directly to the interviewer. The "mention" reaction indicates

jurisdiction.

They

curiosity and the skepticism that Freud felt

was

required of the analytic

patient. In discussing this point, Fenichel notes, that if the patient
"is not skeptical at all, the suspicion is warranted that he is repressing
negative transferences."

It is

not surprising that the interviewer, with

a psychoanalytic orientation, spent about 10 minutes longer with the "mention"
group.

This study demonstrates, then, that these sociological factors

may

be

related to actual differences in the quality of patient-doctor relationship.
In this one limited aspect of the communication pattern, the sociological
background allows us to predict whether the

patient will verbalize his reactions

or not. If this single stress situation is representative of the general
behavior in psychotherapy,

we

can get some notion of why these

related to choice or length of treatment.

'we

factors are

expect that patients

who

decline to mention such an obvious situation as a microphone and tape-recorder,

will be equally loathe to express the variety of feelings about the therapist
which are crucial for analysis of transference.
Further studies of the data are in progress which may increase our
understanding of the observations reported. For example, a detailed content
analysis of the

way

in which the recording

deviant cases.

Two

of these have already been described.

patient, with high

F

score,

who

was mentioned sheds

light

upon the

One was an

older

in contrast to the usual pattern of such

persons, did mention the recording. Hewever, he differed from the other

older patients in having a medical education.

His way of mentioning the

�-h0

-

recording was to suggest a change in the interview from that of doctorpatient to that of colleagues speaking "off the record." One is tempted
to predict the form of his therapeutic resistances from this event. Another
patient mentioned the recording,but in an unusual way. She was delighted
with the "confessional" aspects. In her sociological characteristics, she
too did not fit a clear pattern, being in her 20's, but with a high F
score.

It is

to be noted that she was an ex-Catholic.

Other studies of the psychiatric interview, using experimental stresses
more characteristic of psychotherapy, furnish additional evidence of the
importance of sociological factors. For example, Saslow and Matarozzo

research on psychotherapeutic communication.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67454">
                <text>Max Pollack, Robert Kahn, and Joseph Jaffe: Social Factors and Communication in Psychiatric Patients (research), 1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67455">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67456">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-11-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67457">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67458">
                <text>Pollack, Max; Kahn, Robert L.; Jaffe, Joseph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67459">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67460">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67461">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence: research with Joseph Jaffe, Robert L. Kahn, and Max Pollack</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67462">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67463">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80948">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87509">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94070">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100631">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="282" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="73">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/6ae8392f9c68d3b213edf8358a9597ac.pdf</src>
        <authentication>bdf1e6bcabb4c1d8c82905940f4f07c2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100699">
                    <text>REPRINTED FROM
E. ROTHLIN
(Editor)

NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
VOL. 2 (1961)
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting
of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum
IBasle 1960

ELSEVIERPUBLISHINGCOMPANY
AMSTERDAM

�Reprinted from: E. ROTHLIN (Editor), Neuro-Psychopharmacology, V01. 2 (1961),
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale
Ne'uro-Psychopharmacologicum, Basle 1960
‘

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC RESPONSE PATTERNS OF
SOME PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS
MAX POLLACK, ERIC KARP, GEORGE KRAUTHAMER,
DONALD F. KLEIN AND MAX FINK
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N. Y. (U.S.A.)

PROBLEM

This study of the mode of action of some of the newer psychotropic agents was formulated within the framework of a neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesisl. The concept,
derived from earlier work on convulsive therapiesz, views clinical behavioral change as
a resultant of the interaction of alterations in brain function and the personality of
the subject. The present study emphasizes the question of pattern speciﬁcity of drug
action and its relation to individual differences in behavioral response. The particular
drugs utilized, chlorpromazine3 and imipramine“, were selected on the basis of pilot
studies in this institution in which their effectiveness in altering physiologic and
behavioral patterns had been demonstrated.
This presentation is an interim report of a study currently in progress.
METHOD

Consecutive referrals for drug administration in a voluntary psychiatric hospital were
assigned at random to one of the three drug regimens: (I) chlorpromazine with 1.2%
procyclidine added, (2) imipramine, and a (3) placebo. Medication was administered
in liquid vehicle in a ﬁxed dosage schedule, to a maximum in four weeks. Chlorproma—
zine was begun at 300 mg and increased to 1200 mg daily and imipramine from 75 to
300 mg. Patients continued to be seen three times weekly in individual psychotherapeutic interviews during the period of drug treatment.
Analysis of the data is limited to the ﬁrst 48 cases. These patients are not chronically ill—the majority being admitted for their ﬁrst hospitalization from the community, and a smaller percentage rehospitalized for a recurrence of their illness. Their mean
age was 35.5 years, and years of schooling was 11.9 years. Approximately 57% were
diagnosed in the group of schizophrenias, 28% as affective psychoses and I 5 0/5 psycho—
neuroses and character disorders.
Patients were examined in a four day period prior to drug administration on a
ﬁxed schedule of physiological and psychological procedures which was repeated

during the sixth week of drug treatment.

RESULTS

Group changes in some of the measures with drug treatments are shown in Table I.
The EEG patterns measured quantitatively through electronic frequency analysis5
References

1).

384.

�382

M. POLLACK et

al.

show that imipramine and chlorpromazine differ signiﬁcantly from the control group
and from each other. There was a signiﬁcant reduction in the total electrical activity
in the imipramine group, while there was an increase both in the amount of slow-wave
activity and the slow to fast activity ratios in the chlorpromazine group.
TABLE I
GROUP CHANGES WITH DRUG TREATMENT

EEG
Slow/fast ratio
Total activity
Delta ratio

Control

I rmpramme

Chlarpromazine
w it h Procyc l {dine

0

0

co

0|

++
0
++

Perceptual
Critical ﬂicker fusion 0
Motor
Pursuit—rotor
Tapping speed
Hand steadiness

Intellectual
WechslerBellevue IQ

O
O

++

05
01

——

+

O

O

O

+

o

o

Behavorial rating
Symptom complaint —
0
Depression

+ Increase p.
+ + Increase p.

o

—-

—

o No change

— Decrease
—— Decrease

P
P

0.05
0.01

The reduction in the critical ﬂicker—fusion (CFF) threshold is noted only for the
chlorpromazine group. This test correlated with the increase in EEG slow-wave
activity.The motor tests also reﬂect a differential drug effect with unsteadiness increased by the two drugs, tapping rate unaltered, and pursuit rotor improved only by
the imipramine group. The greatest change in intellectual functioning was scored by
the no-drug group, present to a lesser degree in the imipramine group and absent in
the chlorpromazine group. The lack of equivalent changes for the drug groups may
reﬂect an inhibition of the expected practice effect.
In clinical behavior, all groups showed a reduction in complaints on self-rating
as measured by the Johns Hopkins Scale, with the reduction being greater for the
drug groups. In the Clyde Mood Scale, a Q—sort behavioralrating, there was a quantitative reduction in both the patient’s and the doctor’s ratings of “depression” in the
drug group but not for the control group.
While these data indicate a pattern that suggests differential drug activity, there
was marked heterogeneity within each group on each measure. Table II shows the
changes in CFF for each subject. The number within each box refers to the evaluation
of a change in behavior, rated on a four—point scale by the evaluating psychiatrist.
These are global changes in behavior ratings, and are not necessarily equivalent to
References p. 384.

�NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC RESPONSE PATTERNS

383

ratings of improvement. (Note that the ratings of behavioral change “3” and “4”
were most often associated with changes in CFF of more than one cycle.)
Although the difference in mean CFF score between imipramine and the control
group was not signiﬁcant, the difference in variability (F ratio) was signiﬁcant (P =
0.05). The control group showed a narrow range of change, varying from +1 to ——2
cycles. In contrast, the imipramine group ranged from +2 to ——5 cycles, and chlorpromazine from zero to ——6 cycles. The chlorpromazine group change was in the downward direction only. The individual differences in the alterations of CFF threshold
II

TABLE

CHANGE IN FLICKER FUSION THRESHOLD WITH DRUG TREATMENT
Contrél

+2
+1

o
—1

—2
__3

Imipmmine

2 2 I

4 4 2
I
3 3 1
3 1 1
3
‘

2 2 2 I I
3 I I

1

1

3

1

4 2
4 2

——4

—5
—6

Mean diﬂ.
Change in C.P.S.

Chlorpromazine Behavorial
with Procyclidine
change

2

1

4
4
4
4

4
3 2
3

4
4 3
2

——o.6

——o.4

TABLE

None
Mild
3 Moderate
4 Marked
I
2

——3.1

III

‘CHANGE IN EEG (SLOW/FAST/RATIO) WITH DRUG TREATMENT

1mm
—.4
——.3
——.2

—.1
o

+.1

+.2
+.3

+4
+5

2
2
I
2

1

I

4
I 1
3 2

11
1

443111

3 2

322
4

4 3

4 1 3
4 4 3
4

1

1

1

3

3

1

3:22:22“

INone

2
3

Mild

Moderate
4 Marked

4

+.6

+-7

4
4

&gt;+-7
Mean diff.
Change in slow/fast ratio

firearm

+.026

+.or4

+.401

are also observable in the electroencephalographic indices. Table III shows the changes
in the slow to fast EEG activity ratio demonstrating a wide range in changes for the
controls, a similar pattern for the imipramine group, but a change in only one direc—
tion—that of increased slowing for the chlorpromazine group. The mean increase in
slow-wave activity for the chlorpromazine group was more than I5 times that of the
References p. 384.

�384

M. POLLACK et

al.

control and imipramine groups. There was also a signiﬁcant relation between the increase in slow-wave activity and increasing age with chlorpromazine—older patients
being more susceptible to maximum change.
DISCUSSION

The psychological and EEG ﬁndings show that the agents studied affect these random—
ly selected subjects differentially, producing drug—speciﬁc spectrums of change scores.
This demonstration of drug speciﬁc proﬁles based on multiple tests supports previous
statements by such workers as WIKLER“, LEHMANN7, and KLERMAN et al.8. It should
be noted, however, that these test score proﬁles are contingent on population characteristics and not solely on the biochemical properties of the agents tested. While no
adequate delineation of salient population characteristics is available, two general
schemata are in use—the diagnostic nomenclature, and the concept of ”target symp—
toms”. Neither scheme adequately reﬂects population characteristics, and further
studies of multivariate behavioral, physiologic and psychologic characteristics are
necessary for such delineation. It is thus imperative that drug studies utilize more
detailed analyses of pretreatment physiological and psychological functioning. In the
absence of such methodological reﬁnements, the present confusing and contradictory
data about “drug effects”, “paradoxical reactions”, and imputed speciﬁcities will
continue.
CONCLUSION

I. Pattern speciﬁcities in various tasks can be identiﬁed for group data.
2. Within various groups, individual differences may be great, leading to failure
for some group data to achieve signiﬁcant differences. Further exploration of pattern
speciﬁties for subjects is warranted, using some of the more recent statistical techniques of multivariate analysis.
3. Such pattern speciﬁcities for clusters of subjects may be a more meaningful way
of ordering psychiatric subjects for evaluative studies than conventional nosological
methods.
4. Group data for EEG, CFF and behavior are consistent with neurophysiologic—
adaptive views of drug therapeutic efﬁcacy.
REFERENCES
1

3

3
7

M. FINK, A uniﬁed theory of the action of physiodynamic therapies. ]. Hillside Hosp, 6 (1957)
197.
M. FINK, Effect of anticholinergic compounds on post-convulsive EEG and behavior of psychiatric patients. Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 12 (1960) 359.
M. FINK, R. SHAW, G. GROSS AND F. S. COLEMAN, Comparative study of chlorpromazine and
insulin coma in the therapy of psychosis. ]. Am. Med. Assoc., 166 (1958) 1846.
M. FINK, Electroencephalographic and behavioral effects of Tofranil. Cari. Psychiat. Assoc. f.,
4 (I959) 166 SG. A. ULET’I‘ AND R. G. LOEFFEL, A new resonator-integrator unit for the automatic brain wave
analyser. Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 5 (1953) 113.
A. WIKLER, The Relation of Psychiatry to Pharmacology, Williams &amp; Wilkins, Baltimore, 1957.
H. E. LEHMANN AND J. CSANK, Differential screening of phrenotropic agents in man. J. Clin.
Exptl. Psychopathol., 18 (1957) 222.
G. L. KLERMAN, A. DIMASCIO, M. GREENBLATT AND M. RINKEL, The inﬂuence of speciﬁc per—
sonality patterns on the effects of phrenotropic agents. In Biological Psychiatry, Grune &amp; Stratton, New York, 1959, pp. 224—239.

Printed in The Netherlands

��IWEGPSIGIGLMIB RESPGISB

'

“runs

at

sons rsrczonorzc nuns

Ha: Fullnek Ph.D., Erie Earp 3.1.
George Krauthunor

Ph.n., Donald 1. Klein

Cad HI! Pink

H.D.

Ht”.

Iran the Dapartnent or Exporinentnl Psychiutry, Hillside Helpital,
Glcn Oaks, 3.1., U.I.
Prouontod at the Second Meeting of the Gdllogiuu Internationale Houro~
Payehophnrnacologicun, Basal, July 1960.

1?: 7/60

�Probles:

_ihis study or the node of action at soae er the never
psychotropic agents was teraulated within the tranework of a
neurophysielogie—adaptive hypothesis (1). The concept, derived
from earlier work on oonvulsive therapies (2), views clinical
behavioral change as a resultant of the interaction of alterations
in brain function and the personality of the subject. the
,present study enphasises the question or pattern specificity
of drug action and its relation to individual differences in
behavioral response. The partieelar drugs utilised, ehler»
proaasine (3) and iaipranine (h), were selected on the basis
of pilot studies in this institution in which their ettectiveu
nose in altering physiologic and behavioral patterns had been
demonstrated.

this preeentatien is
currently in progress.

an

interil report

of a study

�hethed:
VIGonseestiye

referrals for

drug

adninistratien in a

voluntary psychiatric hospital were assigned at render to
one of the three drug regimens - (1) ohlorpronasine with
1.21 preoyelidine added, (2) inipraaine, and a (3) plaeebo.
Hedioatien vas adainietered in liquid vehicle in a fixed
dosage schedule, to a saxiaua in tour weeks. chlorproaasine was
begun at 300 as. and increased to 1200 :3. daily and iaipraaine
tree 75 to 300 as. Patients continued to be seen three times
weekly in individual payohotherapeatio interviews during the
period of drug treataent.
Analysis of the data is liaited to the first us cases.
These patients are notohrenioally ill - the majority being
adaitted for their first hospitalisation free the ooaaenity,
and a saaller percentage rehoepitalised for a recurrence or their
illness. Their mean age was 35.5 years, and yeare of schooling
was 11.9 years. Apprexiaetel! 575 were diagnosed in the group
or sohisophrenias, 281 as affective psychoses and 15S psyche‘
neuroses and eharaoter disorders.
Patients were exaained in a four day period prior to drug
adainistration on a fixed schedule or physiological and psyche—
legieal prooederee which was repeated iering the sixth week of
drug

treataent.

�Results:
in cone of the aeaeoree with drug treataente
in the figure I. the EEG patterns aeaeored

Group changes

are

shown

--~----~--“-.
FIGURE I

..—..'.....u.

quantitatively through electronic frequency analyeie (5) show
that inipranine and ohloryronaeine differ significantly from
the control group and from each other. There was a eignificant
reduction in the total electrical activity in the inipranine
group, while there wee an increase both in the amount of slow
ahd
wave activity
the slow to test activity ratio: in the
chlorpronaeine group.
-Thc reduction in the critical flickerotueien (CPI) threehold
ie noted only for the chlorproxaaine group. Thin test
correlated with the increase in EEG elow wave activity. The
rotor tests also reflect a differential drug effect with
uneteadieeee increased by the two drugs, ﬁapping rate unaltered,
and pursuit rotor inproved only by the igipranine group. The
the
greatest change in intellectual functionihg rae scored by
no-drug group, preeeut to a leeeer degree in the iaipraaine
group and absent in the chlorprenaeine group. the lack of
equivalent changes for the drug grounsnay reflect an inhibition
of the expected practice effect.
In clinical behavior, all groups showed a reduction in
coupleinte on self-rating ae measured by the Johne napkins
Scale, with the reduction being greater for the drug groups.

�.h’
611d.
In the
load 80:10, 3 Q-Iort bohuviornl rttilg, that.
an. a qunatitt‘ivo iodnction in both tho pntaoat'n and tho

dﬁﬂttr'. 2:11:33 a: 'dcprocttun' in

tn. contrcl

ﬁhc drug grvup but

‘ot (tr

group.
#311. than. du$t indicatc s ptttorn thnt angg-ata
dittorontiul drug tcttvlﬁy, ‘horo w‘u narkad ho‘crogonuity
within tuck grvup an Oneh nonairo. Fitlrc 2 pluts at. ohnngca

------”--‘
FIGURE 2

ouudunouca

in ctr tar itch aubaoe‘. rho nunbtr within Ouch ban rotort. the 07:1tatton o: n «inn;- tn bahnviur, rated on t tour-point
.031. by sh. ovnlnuting pnynhtutrtnt. it... ‘20 glohnl ch18...
13 bchuvior ratiuga, and gr. not uncocaarily‘oquavglnnt #0
rating. it ingrQVCIdnt. (lot. that £ho ratttan c: habnvtorul

'3' tld 'h' IIII

aunt often ussoctutcd with ehnngnl 1n
err-o: uni. than on. cycle)
Althodgh tbs d1£t¢rcnoo in 3033 err near. botviun
'tltpruutno and tho «Chiral group van tot signitiegnt, 6h:
atttorcnco 1: vartthtltﬁy (1 ratio) III utgnizicgnt (p .o;).
admiral
It.
gran; unused u narruv r.n¢c at chgngo, vnryiu;
chaago

Iran
tron

to n! 31:10:. In contrast; tut Slipranlno xrtup :;n¢od
+2 tn -5 grains, and chlarpzalnsinn (ran not. to -6 cyclan.
Ina chlorprunalinn stump chang- vas a: Shh downward atroction
only. the 1nd£v1dnu1 dittorono¢n ta thn t1¢irtiiill If G?!
tarantula 1:. .13d ohaorvahln 13 thn olaotro.ncopha10¢raph1¢
«an... run:- 3 an: tho clung“ 1a a. :1» u
no «any;
+1

an

�-5...

ﬁ.‘ﬂ---‘ﬂ“.119333 3

O‘ﬂumnabndou

ratio demonstrating a wide range in changes fer the controls,
a eiailar pattern tor the 1a1praaine group, but a change in
enly one direction that of increaaed slewing fer the chlorpreaaaina sweep. The teen increase in elev wave activity
for the ehlorpreaaaine group was more than 15 tines that or
—

the central and 1a1praaine groupe. there was also a
aignifieant relation between the increaee in aloe wave
activity and increasing age with chlorpreaaaine - elder

patiente being late eneceptible te naxinna change.

�Dieeeeeion:

psychological and £36 findings ehoe that the
agente etudied affect theee randomly eeleoted eubjecte
differentially, producing drug-epocitio epoctroae or change
eooree. This deeonotration or drug epocitic profiles
based on multiple tests supports previoue statements by ouch
The

(7), and Klenaan et al (8).
It ehould be noted, however, that theee toot ecore profiles
are contingent on population ohareoterietioa and not eolely
on the biochemical propertiee e: the agente tested. While
no adeqoete delineation of eelient population oheraoterietice
ie available, two general eohenata are in nee ~ the diagnoetio
neaenclatore, and the concept or I"tax-got eynpteae'. leither
ooheee adequately retleete population oharaoterietioe, and
further otudiee of multivariate behavioral, phyeiologio end
peyohelogio oharaoterietioe are neeeeeary for each delineation.
It in thee imperative that drug etodiee utilise more detailed
analyses or pretreataent psychological and physiological
toentioning. In the abeenoe or euoh aethodological refinements,
the present confueing and contradictory data about ”drug
effects", "paradoxical reactions“, and iapeted epeoiiicitiee
will continue.
workere ao Wikler

(6),

Lohmann

�Conclueieﬁ:
(1) ~Psttern

speeifieities
identified for group dsts.

1n

vsrieus tasks can be

differencss
individusl
various
Within
groups,
(2)
to
dsts
sons
for
group
to
failure
be
lesding
great,
as:
of
Further
explorstien
differences.
sehisve signifiesnt
some
using
usrrsntsd,
is
for
subjects
psttsra speeitities
of the nets recent ststistiesl techniques at nultivsrists
snslysis.
or
clusters
for
Bush
(3)
pattern speeitieities
of
psychistrie
ordering
he
nssniugful
we:
nsre
s
nsy
sabjsets
nsselegiesl
eenventiensl
thsa
studies
evaluative
for
subjects

methods.

.

(h) ﬁreup dsts fer use, err and behsvier sre eensistent
with nearephysielsgie-sdspt1ts views 9! drug therspeutic

etilesey.

�‘8REFEREHGES

tho
Action
or
of
Thoory
Enitiod
Physiodynonic
i
Thoropioo. J. Hillaido IOIE. é; 197~206, 1957.
2. link, H: Effect of Anticholinorgio Gonpoundo on Poot~
convulsivo BEG ond Behavior of Psychiatric Potionto.
E30 6113. lcurophyoiol. $3: 359-369, 1960
3. Pink, H., Show, 3., Grout, G. and Calcium, 1.8.
Corporativo Study of chlorprouojino onc Insulin Geno in
the therapy or Poychoéis. J. inor. nod. Aoooc. ;§gs
18h6~18§0, i958.
h. rink, H: Electroencephalographic and Behavioral
Effects of Torronil. Gonna. Pczch. Assoc. J. g. 166$~1718,

1. rink,

K:

1959.

Blott, G.A., Ind Lootfcl, 3.6. A new resonator1ntogrotor unit for the antarctic brain wave onolyaor.
Clio. Houroghzaiol., g} 113-115, 1953.
6. Viklor, A.: 2&amp;0 Relation of Pazchiotrz to Phornocologz,
an. a Wilkins, Boltinoro, 1957.
Lohnonn, B.E. and Crank, 3.: Bittorontioi scrocning or
Phronotropic Agents in Hon. J. Olin. Razor. Pczchogothol.
EEG

lg:

222—235, 1957.

Klornan, 0.1., Dixaccio, L., ﬁrocnblott, K. and Rinkol, H:
the Influence of Specific Personality Pottcrnc on the

Effects of Phrcnotropio Agents. Biological Pazchiotrz,
Gruno

&amp;

Strottcn,

New

York, 22h-239, 1959.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2814">
                <text>Neuropsychologic response patterns of some psychotropic drugs. In E. Rothlin (ed.), Neuro-psychopharmacology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1961, 2:381-4</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2815">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2816">
                <text>mfp-02-01-003-50-016</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2817">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2818">
                <text>Pollack, Max; Karp, Eric; Krauthamer; Klein, Donald F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2819">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2820">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2821">
                <text>Reprint and [preprint]. REPRINTED FROM E.ROTHLIN (Editor) NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY VOL. 2 (1961). Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum Basle 1960</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2822">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2823">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74484">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81045">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87606">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94167">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="291" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6564">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/aaac38fc36161269f14f4617b6ef620f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>09f64ba46dc2ab1bcb50e506d78ad27a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107168">
                    <text>v._,

SOCIAL ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT IN THREE HOSPITALS:
METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS 1/

«-

hoWCV‘

in

Max Pollack, Ph. D. , Nathaniel Siegel, Ph. D.
Robert L. Kahn, Ph. D. , and Max Fink,_M. D.

-

inst

logic P
hospit‘
same }
scitiﬂg

The generalization of findings from one population to another is basic to any science.
Psychiatry. perhaps more than other medical specialties. is plagued with controversies
concerning the non-reproducibility of results. One factor responsible for this state is the
failure of investigators to adequately describe their populations and methods. The organ.
ization of multiple hospital studies makes possible the detection and clarification of the"
methodological difficulties. We would like to describe some of the problems we encountered in a recent tri-hospital study. with reference to the variables of type of treatment,
discharge diagnosis, ratings of clinical improvement at time of. discharge and length of

knoWiE

tal dis

A

routin(
at MM

-ga.

would
hoapiti

hospital stay.

pang!

Various social psychiatric studies of community and hospital psychiatric populations
(1, Z, 6) have established the importance of sociopsychological factors in the type and incidence of mental disorder. the selection and maintenance of treatment and therapeutic
evaluations. In these previous studies such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the extent and type of available treatment facilities may have been more signi.
ficant in the observed results than the social variables studied. A more critical test of the
role of soda-psychological factors in treatment would be a study in a setting where the
same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients, regardless of their
ability to pay. This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital, and in 1957, we embarked out
a program of assaying the relation of sociopsychological factors to the treatment of hospi.
talized psychiatric patients (3. 4). Each patient receives individual psychotherapy and by
request of his physician, somatotherapy (convulsive or psychopharmacological therapy).
Our method of investigation was a census-type survey of all in-patients on a given
day (3). In addition a brief modified California F Scale test (2, 5) was administered to all
patients. We observed that age, education, sex, foreign-birth. and performance on the
California I? Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hospitalization, clinical discharge ratings and to clinical diagnosis.

order to test the reliability of these findings, we repeated this study at Hillside
Hospital in 1958, employing the same procedures and, concurrently extended it to two
other institutions. the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hospital and the Massachusetts Mental
Health Center (MMHC). These institutions are similar to Hillside Hospital in that both
psychoanalytically - oriented psychotherapy and somatic therapies are available. They
were selected for the additional reason that one serves predominately socioeconomic
Class I and II patients (Menninger Hosp.) and the other. predominately Class IV and V.

L

soclat'
the let
that tr
psychc
of noti
chothe

basis'

with tl
tient c
psycht

chiatr
reside

I

ciplin'

.wn-w

gists.

view

$

In

(MMHC).

Observations

Dia n

that tl
behav
the sa
sent 5
charg

classi
these

Hospital Structure

ducin;

reporting data from ones own institution. the structure of the hospital is taken
for granted. and either ignored or briefly mentioned. When approaching a new institution._
.When

distox
Note

the department of Experimental Psychiatry,
l/ N.From
Y.

Hillside Hospital Glen Oaks,

1... I. .

Aided. in part, by grant MY-Z715 of the National Institute of Mental Health; and the
Nassau County Mental Health Board.
The cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health Center and the C. F.
'
Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.
.

202

‘

and a
five-f
comp

rion

(

Disc}:

the c:
prove

�r,

7'

attempting to gather comparable data one is made aware of the differences
institutions and the nature of the hospital organization is seen as one of the methodoBoth the MMHC and Menninger institutions have day
logic problems affecting treatment.
physician can care for the
hospital units.and Hillside does not. At the MMHC the treating
clinic. In such a
in
the
and
after-care
in
the
hospital,
day
in-patient,
an
”me patient as
the
at
from
an earlier date,
hospital
,ctting’ the treating doctor can dischargeforthe‘patient
in
Hillside Hospiwhereas
his
patient's
care;
be
he
still
responsible
will
that
Mowing
of
the
relationship.
termination
patient-doctor
ux discharge means
towcvcr- and
in

.
"ru‘

~1uwv1

different research programs. affecting clinical
survey, approximately 20 percent of the patients
been
had
and
ill
hospitalized for many years. Such a group
at MMHC were chronically
state
would not normally have been in this hospital but they were transferred from another
hospital for special study purposes.
Designation of Type of Treatment
In our assessments of specific variables, we encountered a variety of problems associated with the content of hospital records. For example, it was difficult to determine
of time spent in
the length of stay prior to referral for a somatic treatment, or the length
that treatment. However, a major problem was to learn which patients were receiving
psychotherapy. Our task was not to define psychotherapy, but the much simpler problem
of noting Which patients were designated by the hospital as having been treated with psy- ‘
chotherapy. At Menninger Hosptial, psychotherapy was administered on a prescription
basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the patient was charged an additional fee. Sessions
with the psychiatric resident physician were considered part of routine administrative patient care and were not recorded as psychotherapy. At Hillside Hospital the definition of
psypsychotherapy was limited to treatment sessions with the psychiatric resident. Staff the
chiatrists did not treat patients directly, but restricted their activity to supervising
Another problem was the presence of
routincs- For example. at the time of the

.....

.
a.

“syn

a

-w~a.u.r--

M

-.M——-.—

5"

t

V_

.

.
,.

v.71
_

.I-uv-n-

‘-.p..o-i.m

‘W,

runny-.9.

-l

residents.

‘4,"V‘OQ‘M'A'ﬁ

In contrast, at the MMHC psychotherapy was designated as a function of many disciplines - psychiatric residents, nurses. medical students, social workers and psychologists. To ascertain whether or not a patient was receiving psychotherapy we had to inter-

view

the resident physician in charge of the case.

‘71-'Nuo-nyap

..._...,.

,—

—-—
-vw“

Diagnosis

-\»
,...

a...

assessment of diagnosis was another problem area. It is not surprising
that there are institutional diagnostic “styles which reflect staff orientations rather than the
behavior of the patient. Pasamanick and his associates (7) has shown that diagnoses within
the same institution are vulnerable to individual differences among examiners. In our present study. there were differences in the terminology of the discharge diagnosis. Discharge diagnoses at Menninger Hospital were more descriptive and employed a multiple
classification system. Table I illustrates several examples and shows how we converted
these into more generic categories that could be applicable to all three institutions. In reducing multiple diagnoses to single generic ones, we were aware that we were introducing
distortions through this maneuver.
Table II illustrates the distribution of diagnostic categories within each institution.
Note that at the Menninger Hospital there was a lower incidence of diagnosed schizophrenia
and affective psychoses. while the diagnosis of personality disorder exceeds by three and
five-fold that found in the other two hospitals.- We would emphasize that cross hospital
comparisons of populations basedpn diagnosis as the single or the most important criterion does not insure comparability of populations.
The

.i-u.v.-.‘Mdh&amp;

M

u--.

,

~

~m.va-».....
P...

wv"

4

r
..

R."

s

~.

,
.

—w

.

n—‘w—w-vw-

\*_sm,~,-.w...—mp--

'

7

”avcuuuft

Discharge Ratings of Improvement

.-

Similar problems exist for the equivalence of global ratings of improvement. As in
the case of diagnosis, Menninger Hospital had the most elaborate discharge ratings of improvement and Hillside Hospital. the simplest.
.

1

~

A

.w»

wo-ﬁ-‘v.

-

w-

2

203

l
':

l

.
.

T
1’

�TYPES OF DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS

Patient Discharge Rating
1. Depression Reaction
Narcissistic Personality
2. Anxiety Reaction
Narcissistic Personality
3. Narcissistic Personality
4. Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
5. Passive Aggressive
Personality
Alcoholism
6. Infantile Personality
Schizophrenic Reaction
Schizo-Affective Type

Classification Rating
Psychoneurosis
Psychoneurosis
Personality Trait Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
'

‘

Sociopathic Personality

Disturbance

Schizophrenic Psychosis

TABLE II
DISTRIBUTION OF DIAGNOSIS (PERCENTAGE)
Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

Schizophrenia

41

52

52

Personalitybisorders

33

6

Psychoneuroses
Affective Psychoses
Organic Psychoses
Transient Personality
Disorder

14

18

8

21

16

5

l

5

2

2

6

100

173

N:

13

,

93
‘

As shown in Table, III the discharge rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite and a
separate rating given for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside and
MMHC had similar global ratings and it is difficult to state how much weight was given to
each of the three factors incorporated in the Menninger system. Such differences in systems makes it difficult to compare treatment results of hospitalization.

Hospitalization
Length of hospitalization for most illnesses, including psychiatric disorders, commonly denotes both severity of illness and response to treatment. As such. it is frequently
used as an index for interhospital comparison. Table IV compares length of hospitalization
by age at the time of the study. There was an observable relation between length of stay
and age within each institution, with age being inversely related to length of hospitalization.
Yet. among these three hospitals there were marked differences.
When diagnosis is employed a similar pattern is obtained. At Menninger Hospital the
over one
percentage of patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia who were hospitalised
'
year was 91%. at Hillside Hospital 35% and at MMHC. 77o.
204

We

11:

'

factor not
generalizir

,

methodolog

There
single diag

sociopsych
difficulty.

5‘

‘

Studiii:

birth, edui

nificantly 1.
improvemc:
choanalyti&lt;-

tures - one
the other.

‘

�TABLE III
‘

RATINGS OF CLINICAL CONDITION AT TIME
OF HOSPITAL DISCHARGE

Hillside

Menninger

Improved
Unimproved
r.

MMHC

“'““”i“"‘

,-

«a..——q

SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT

,

"VT'~M-»

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

a.

waw

9.9.
«an::r:r;t?.'ﬁ~'"'ﬁ'f”“

o“

.

Improved

CHARACTER STRUCTURE

Moderately Improved
Slightly Improved '
‘

Unimproved

Improved
Unimproved

.

.v-‘n.

1

.

Unimproved

’

~

~VWT~I

Regression

SYNDROME

..
V

'

Complete Remission

””"1"

Improved

Unchanged (or worse)
a'v‘r‘.':'§l':"t'.“"""""""‘

TABLE IV

.

HOSPITAL STAY BY AGE
PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP
STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

A~-;

_-

Inf.)

.
.,i

~-

-‘

.a-.&lt;__.

u-

.,.I

Age

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

Below 20
20-29
30-39
40-49

81

42

14

73

36

6

61

30

6

30

20

0

50+

-_.-..-&lt;

vm

r
,

36

0

,

““*‘".'"‘-'-«rvm-AﬁuvnrcM-mvr“

V"

'

'

0

u‘

"rm-J'W-

V

12219122192
ﬂ."

j
J.“

~..

4....

We have indicated that the philosophy and organization of institutions is an essential
{actor not to be ignored in assessing observations and reports. Faced with the problem of

generalizing our findings, how do we overcome these institutional
methodological stumbling blocks to scientific activity?

‘.r‘a-..—..,._

differences that are the

«4“le

.-,...

a...

5“

-....

5hérv~naVvu

.--

a

.-.4

..

“4‘...

«a;

.v”

..

.

There is an urgent need for objective techniques to describe populations. The use of
diagnostic terms is obviously inadequate. It is likely that detailed behavioral and
sociopsychological descriptions of patients may be the best technique for overcoming this
single

«M-M~—,t...y.-.r,

difficulty.

Summary
Studies of the in-patient population of Hillside Hospital indicated that age, foreignbirth. education and stereotypic attitudes as measured by the California F Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hospitalization. discharge ratings of
improvement and diagnosis. We have extended this study to other institutions offering psychoanalytically-orientedpsychotherapy and somatic therapies with different social structures - one the Massachusetts Mental Health Center. serving "lower-class" patients and
the other, the C. F. Menninger Memorial Hospital. serving "upper-class" patients.
.

‘vvw-WOv—u-wm-Mvr-

.
ws—vt‘v-~.o-‘-

.-,.
'&lt;

'

205

u

r
~-.

.
.-

”4...”.-.

�,rm

We have encountered a variety of problems in this comparison. including difference.
in l) the type of hospital organization; 2) the definition of the treatment as in the designstion of which patients were receiving psychotherapy; 3) discharge rating systems of clinical
improvement; and 4) diagnostic "styles” employed.

.....

~.

a

.w»-._.r

..x

a

The importance of these methodological problems in current psychiatric research are
discussed.
References
(l) Hollingshead, A. B. , and Redlich, F. C.: Social Class and Mental Illness: A Commun.
ity Study. New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons. Inc. . l958.

a...»

.'

(Z)

Gallagher, E. B. : Levinson. D. J. , and Erlich, 1.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric Treatment, in The Patient
and the Mental Hospital. edited by M. Greenblatt, D.J. Levinson, and R. H. Williams,
Chicago. Free Press. 1957.

, Pollack, M. and Fink. M. : Social Factors in Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital. J. Hillside Hospital 6: 216-228, 1957.

(3) Kahn, R. L.

L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M. Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric
Treatment in A Voluntary Mental Hospital: Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge
Ratings. and Diagnosis. A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 1: 565-574. 1959.
(5) Kahn, R. L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Neu. Ment. Dis.‘ 130: 189-192, 1960.
(4) Kahn, R.

(6)

Myers, J. K. , and Schaffer. L. : Social Stratification and Psychiatric Practice: AStudy
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev.l 19:307-310. 1954.

(7)

Pasamanick. B. , Dinitz. S. and Lefton. M. : Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to
Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental Hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat. . l_l_6_: 127-132. 1959.
DISCUSSION

DR. KLERMAN:

One of the ways to overcome the biasing factors related to length of stay is to calculate the mean stay for each hospital. In this way interhospital comparisons of the effect
of such variables as age on length of stay could be compared in terms of quartiles.

.
r

.4

g

DR. POLLACK:

.9101.

..

;v

That's a good suggestion, however it still doesn't overcome the problem of differences in hospital structure. e. g. , the presence or absence of a day hospital facilities. in
inﬂuencing length of hospital stay.

«2'

‘Z

uhwﬁﬁl'nl

DR. OPPENHEIM:

The finding that younger patients tended to stay longer at the hospital seemed to be at
variance with experience at VA Hospitals. I ask what was it about the therapeutic programs at the three hospitals that led to these findings? What are the theoretical implications of these findings ?

“AL.

in
\:A
9;.-

.41:

...,

s

——....-.-A..—

.-..~u-....v-l-~

.e...

“4...-..“

-.‘_......-c

DR. POLLACK:

The length of time a patient is hospitalized in a psychiatric facility is related to the
particular function and philosophy of the institution. In those hospitals that stress psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy, patients who are most like the therapists with regard
to sociopsychological factors are kept in treatment for the longest period.
In studies of
out-patient clinics with a psychoanalytic orientation, it has been found that persons from
higher social levels. as determined by education and income, are treated longer. In contrast. in state hospitals the results are quite different. Thus, it has been shown that state
hospital patients with the least education will be institutionalized longer and are more
likely to become the chronic patients. Consistent with the concept of state hospitals as
largely providing long-term custodial care for lower class patients, the state hospital
psychiatrist may be oriented toward a comparatively more'rapid discharge of those
patients who come from a background most like his own.

206

v"

.va

—v

:

��Social Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Hospitals:
Methodological Problems

Max

Pollack, Ph.D., Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D., and

Max

Fink, M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside
Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N.Y.
ﬁos
Presented at the Sixth Annual Veterans Administration Research
Conference, March 28, 1961, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Aided, in part, by grant MY~2715 of the National Institute of
From

Mental Health; and the Nassau County Mental Health Board.
The cooperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully
acknowledged.
IV:

h/17/6l

�Social ASpects of Psychiatric Treatment in Three Hospitals:
Methodological Problems

generalization of findings from one population to
another is basic to any science. Psychiatry, perhaps more
than other medical specialties, is plagued with controversies
concerning the non-reproducibility of results. One factor
responsible for this state is the failure of investigators to
adequately describe their populations and methods. The advent
The

of simultaneous multiple hOSpital studies makes possible the

detection and clarification of these methodological difficulties. We would like to describe some of the problems we
encountered in a recent tri-hospital study, and will consider
the variables of type of treatment, discharge diagnosis,

ratings of clinical improvement at time of discharge and
length of hospital stay.
Various social psychiatric studies of community and
heapital psychiatric populations (1, 2, 6) had established
the importance of sociopsychological factors in the type
and incidence of mental disorder, the selection and mainten—
ance of treatment and therapeutic evaluations.
previous studies such selective factors as the

In these

patient's

extent and type of available
treatment facilities may have been more significant in the
observed results than the social variables studied. A more

financial resources

or the

�-2-

critical test

sociopsychological factors in
treatment would be a study in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients,
regardless of their ability to pay. This requirement is not
at Hillside Hospital, and in 1957, we embarked on a program
of assaying the relation of sociopsychological factors to
the treatment of hospitalized psychiatric patients (3, h).
Each patient receives individual psychotherapy and by request
of his physician, somatotherapy (convulsive or psychopharmacological therapy). Almost all patients are non-chronic, as
their admission to the hospital is associated either with
first hospitalization or a recurrence of illness after a long
period of remission. The case load is small, with at most
ten patients to one resident physician.
Our method of

all

in—patients on
modified California

all patients.
birth,

role

of the

We

of

investigation was a census«type survey of
a given day (3). In addition a brief
F

Scale

observed

test

(2, 5) was administered to

that age, education, sex, foreign-

California F Scale were significantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hOSpitalization, clinical discharge ratings and to clinical diagnosis.
In order to test the reliability of these findings, we
repeated this study at Hillside Hospital in 1958, employing
the same procedures and, concurrently extended it to two
other institutions, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital and
and performance on the

�-3the Massachusetts Mental Health Center

(MMHC).

These

insti-

tutions are similar to Hillside Hospital in that both
psychoanalytically - oriented psychotherapy and somatic
therapies are available. They were selected for the additional reason that one serves predominately socialogical Class I
and

II patients

and the

other, predominately Class

IV and V.

�-hOBSERVATIONS

Hospital Structure:
When

reporting data

from ones own

institution, the

structure of the hOSpital is taken for granted,

and

either

ignored or briefly mentioned. However, when approaching a
strange institution and attempting to gather comparable data
one is made aware of the differences in institutions and the
nature of the hospital organization is seen as one of the
methodologic problems affecting treatment. .Both the
Menninger
does

institutions

not. At the

MMHC

MMHC

and

hospital units, and Hillside
the treating physician can care for

have day

the same patient as an in-patient, in the day hOSpital, and
in the after-care clinic. In such a setting, the treating
doctor can discharge the patient from the hospital at an

earlier date, knowing that he will still be reSponsible for
his patient's care; whereas in Hillside Hospital discharge
termination of the patient—doctor relationship.
Another problem was the presence of different research
programs, affecting clinical routines. For example, at the
time of the survey, approximately twenty percent of the
patients at MMHC were chronically ill and had been hOSpitalized
for many years. Such a group would not normally have been in

means

this hospital but they

were

transferred

hOSpital for Special study purposes.

from another

state

�-5Designation of Type of Treatment:
In our assessments of specific variables, we encountered
a variety of problems associated with the content of hoSpital
records. For example, it was difficult to determine the
length of stay prior to referral for a somatic treatment, or
the length of time spent in that treatment. However, a
major problem was to learn which patients were receiving
psychotherapy. Our task was not to define psychotherapy,
but the much simpler problem of noting which patients were
designated by the hospital as having been treated with psychotherapy. At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was administered
on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for which the

patient was charged an additional fee. Sessions with the
psychiatric resident physician were considered part of routine
administrative patient care. At Hillside Hospital the definition of psychotherapy was limited to treatment sessions with
the psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did not treat
patients directly, but restricted their activity to supervising the residents.
In contrast, at the MMHC psychotherapy was designated as
a function of many disciplines - psychiatric residents, nurses,
medical students, social workers and psychologists. To
ascertain whether or not a patient was receiving psychotherapy
we had to interview the resident physician in charge of the
case.

�Diagnosis:
The assessment of diagnosis was another problem area.

It

is not surprising that there are institutional diagnostic styles
which reflect staff orientations rather than the behavior of
the patient. Pasamanick and his associates (7) have shown that
diagnoses within the same institution are vulnerable to individual differences among examiners. In our present study,
there were differences in the terminology of the discharge
diagnosis. Discharge diagnoses at Menninger Hospital were
more descriptive and employed a multiple classification system.
Table I illustrates several examples and shows how we converted
these into more generic categories that could be applicable
to all three institutions. In reducing multiple diagnoses to
single generic ones, we are aware that we are introducing

distortions through this maneuver.

II illustrates the distribution of diagnositic
categories within each institution. Note that at the
Table

Menninger Hospital there was a lower incidence of diagnosed

schizophrenia and affective psychoses, while the diagnosis of
personality disorder exceeds by three and five-fold that found
in the other two hospitals.

�We

would emphasize

tions based

that cross hospital comparisons of popula-

diagnosis as the single or the most important
criterion does not insure comparability of populations.
on

Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Similar problems exist for the equivalence of global
ratings of improvement. As in the case of diagnosis,
Menninger HOSpital had the most elaborate discharge ratings
of improvement and Hillside Hospital, the simplest.
As shown in Table III the discharge rating at Menninger
Hospital was tripartite and a separate rating given for social,

characterological
had

and syndrome changes.

weight was

and

MMHC

it

is difficult to state how
given to each of the three factors incorpora-

similar global ratings and

much

Hillside

ted in the Menninger system. Such differences in systems
makes it difficult to compare treatment results of hospitaliza-

tion.

Hospitalization:
Length of hosPitalization for most illnesses, including
psychiatric disorders, commonly denotes both severity of

�-8-

illness

and response to

treatment.

As

such,

it

is frequently

interhospital comparison. Table IV
length of hospitalization by age at the time of the

used as an index for
compares

study. There was an observable relation between length of
stay and age within each institution, with age being inversely
related to length of hospitalization. Yet, among these three
hospitals there were marked differences.

diagnosis is employed a similar pattern is obtained.
At Menninger Hospital the percentage of patients with the
diagnosis of schizophrenia who were hospitalized over one
When

year was

91%,

at Hillside Hospital

35%

and

at

MMHC,

7%.

DISCUSSION

indicated that the philosophy and organization
of institutions is a factor not to be ignored in assessing
observations and reports. Faced with the problem of generalizing our findings, how do we overcome these institutional
differences that are the methodological stumbling blocks to
We

have

scientific activity?
is

for objective techniques to
describe populations. The use of single diagnostic terms is
obviously inadequate. It is possible that detailed behavioral
There

an urgent need

�-9sociopsychological descriptions of patients
best technique for overcoming this difficulty.
and

may be

the

�-10SUMMARY

Studies of the in~patient population of Hillside Hospital
indicated that age, foreign-birth, education and stereotypic
attitudes as measured by the California F Scale were signifi-

cantly related to choice of treatment, duration of hoSpitalization, discharge ratings of improvement and diagnosis. The
same therapeutic facilities were equally available to all
patients, predominantly middle-class, and ability to pay was
not a factor in treatment. We have extended this study to
Other institutions offering psychoanalytically-oriented
psychotherapy and somatic therapies with different social

structures -

one the Massachusetts Mental Health Center,

serving "lower-class" patients and the other, the C.F.
Menninger Memorial Hospital, serving "upper-class" patients.
We have encountered a variety of problems in this
comparison, including differences in: l) the type of
hospital organization; 2) the definition of the treatment
as in the designation of which patients were receiving
psychotherapy; 3) discharge rating systems of clinical
improvement; and h) diagnostic
The

"styles" employed.

importance of these methodological problems in

current psychiatric research are discussed.

�TABLE

I

TYPES OF DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS

PATIENT DISCHARGE RATING

CLASSIFICATION RATING

1. Depression Reaction

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

\2. Anxiety Reaction

Narcissistic Personality
3. Narcissistic Personality
h. Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
5. Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism
6.

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction

Schizo-Affective

Type

Psychoneurosis

Personality Trait Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

DISTRIBUTION OF DIAGNOSIS (PERCENTAGE)

Menninger

Hillside

MEEE

Schizophrenia
Personality Disorders

hl

52

S2

33

6

13

Psychoneuroses

1h

18

8

Affective Psychoses

5

21

16

Organic Psychoses

S

l

5

Transient Personality

2

2

6

100

173

93

Disorder

N =

�TABLE

III

RATINGS OF CLINICAL CONDITION AT TIME
OF

HOSPITAL DISCHARGE

Menninger

Hillside

MMHC

SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved
Unimproved
CHARACTER

STRUCTURE

Improved
Unimproved
SYNDROME

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Improved

Unimproved

Regression

�TABLE IV

HOSPITAL STAY BY AGE
PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

Menninger

Hillside

yﬁﬁg

Below 20

81

h2

lb

20-29

73

36

6

30-39

61

30

6

ho-h9

3o

20

0

50+

36

0

0

ggg_

�REFERENCES

Hollingshead, A.B., and Redlich, F.C.: Social Class and Mental
Illness: A Community Study, New York, Joha Wiley &amp; Sons,

Inc.,

1958.

Gallagher, E.B.: Levinson, D.J., and Erlich, Y.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics of Patients and Their
Relevance for Psychiatric Treatment, in Ehe Patient and the
Mental Hospital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D.J. Levinson,
and R.H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Factors in
Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Heepital.
J. Hillside Hospital é: 216-228, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis.
A.M.A. Arch. Gen.

Psychiat.

l:

565-57h, 1959.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude
(California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy. J. Nerv. Ment.

Kahn,

2i§.,

Egg: 189-192, 1960.

J.K., and Schaffer, L.: Social Stratification and
Psychiatric Practice: A Study of an Out-Patient Clinic,

Myers,

Sociol. Rev., 19: 307-310, 19Sh.
Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lofton, M.: Psychiatric Orientation and its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a
Mental Hospital. Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, 1959.
Am.

��Mmunattm of Patton Populations:
Catapult-ability of 5mm 2!: Evaluating Thmpiu Mam Mutation!
The

Mam Fink. M.

From
A

the

D.

Miami Its-mat. of Ptycmuy at 8:.

Loans

sum Hospital. 8t.

Loni:

hand an and“. madman: at tho mum. nuptial. New York in
ramwith
Du. R. I... Kuhn. N. 310901 and M. Pollack, and tar be puhmhod

«Remnant

'smmyohtﬂoqtal Aspects at madman Truman m m mammary Hospitals“
uin 1863.

�Recent community studies have demonstrated a
between social factors and psychiatric treatment.

relationship
In their study

psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and
Redlich reported significant relationships between an individual's
position in the social class structure and the prevalence of treated
of the

New Haven

illness, types

of diagnosed disorders and kinds and duration of

psychiatric treatment administered (3). The influence of patient
economic status upon the availability of treating personnel, however,
was not excluded in these studies. To test the role of social
factors in the treatment of hospitalized patients independent of

patient's finances

and

availability of treatments,

undertaken at Hillside Hospital in 1957.

variety of treatment

In

a

survey was

this hospital,

a

including individual psychotherapy and
organic therapies are available to all patients regardless of their
ability to pay.
In the Hillside studies (h,5) it was observed that patients
hospitalized for the shortest period were the oldest, had the least
education and were most likely to have been foreign born. The older,
modes,

less educated patients were predominantly treated

by convulsive

therapy and received the more favorable discharge ratings. Younger,
native born and more educated patients were hospitalized the longest,

treated primarily

generally received the poorer
discharge ratings. The clinical factors were also related to a
measure of stereotypy, the California F Scale (1,6). Higher F
scores, i.e., greater stereotypy, were often found in patients
by psychotherapy and

�-2diagnosed as involutional psychosis

who were

referred for somatic

therapy, hospitalized for a shorter period, and more often were
rated as much improved or recovered.
Another hypothesis developed at this time was that differences
in various aSpects of psychiatric treatment among hospitals should
show the same relationship to social factors as noted within Hillside
Hospital. To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the
procedures of the 195? Hillside study in three institutions ~—

Hillside HOSpital, the C.F. Menninger

Memorial

Hospital of Topeka

the Massachusetts Mental Health Center of Boston. These institutions were selected with the expectation that they served patients
of different social classes. It was anticipated that in these
hospitals there would be a similarity in attitude towards treatment

and

and education.

is a teaching hospital with a full time superactive research departments. They emphasize

Each

visory staff and
psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy but provide other treatments such as somatic therapies and active programs of milieu therapy.
Each stresses short-term treatment of voluntary patients and does
not provide custodial care.
The specific aims of this study were to determine the population
characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social
class, age, education and F score: and to relate these characteristics
to the treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the institutions.

�-3METHOD

A

census of

institutions

all voluntary, adult patients in residence

in these

undertaken in January, 1959. While Menninger and
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients only, a small number of
those at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center (MMHC) were assigned
by the courts for psychiatric evaluation or were members of a chronic
was

schizophrenic state hospital group transferred for a Specific
research project. These patients were excluded from the study
because of their non-voluntary status.

given the
California F scale on the census day. Eighteen months later the
records of discharged patients were examined to determine the social
and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of social class,
the Hollingshead 2~factor index - a weighted score of education and
occupation - was used (2). The study population consisted of 173

patients at Hillside,

100

at Menninger

Each

patient

and 95

was

at the Massachusetts

Mental Health Center.
The

study included examination of the relations of the social

to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as
between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult

however,

because of various methodological differences discussed below. These
difficulties were most marked in the intrahospital comparisons, and

accordingly, in the analyses of psychiatric variables emphasis will
be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
intrainstitutional trends. These difficulties also led to missing
information for some data, which is reflected in the varying
population sample sizes in the tables.

�4,.
RESULTS

A.

Inter-hospital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems

reporting studies from a home institution, the
structure of the hospital is taken for granted and either ignored
or mentioned briefly. However, in studying a strange institution
and attempting to gather comparable data one is made aware of the
many differences between institutions. While we selected these
institutions as comparable in teaching, research and treatment programs, we found that they were unlike structurally in ways which
influenced the data of the study. Specific problems were noted in
the designation of type of treatment, diagnostic classes and the
evaluation of treatment outcome.
3) Designation of Type of Treatment: The criteria for designating that a patient received "psychotherapy" differed among the
institutions, making uniformity in classification difficult.
At Menninger Hospital psychotherapy was designated as treatment
administered on a prescription basis by a staff psychiatrist for
which the patient was charged a fee. Sessions with the psychiatric
resident were considered part of routine administrative patient care.
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy was defined as treatment
sessions with the psychiatric resident. Staff psychiatrists did
not treat patients, but restricted their activities to supervising
the resident physicians. No additional fees were charged.
When

�-5the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was
designated as a function of many disciplines -- psychiatric residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident in charge of each case.
b) Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles made
comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed the
multiple evaluative data scheme recommended by the American Psychiatric Association while both Hillside and MMHC followed unitary
At

systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed
in Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable
to that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortion.

Ratings of improvement at
the three hospitals varied in format and detail. The discharge
rating at Menninger HoSpital Was tripartite with a separate evaluation for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside
Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global ratings
making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor of the
c) Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Menninger system (Table

II).

For

this study the Menninger

syndrome

�~6—

rating

was compared

to the global ratings of the other institutions.

----- ------Table

II

Sociopsychological Variables
The distribution of the variables of social class, age,
Jacation and California F Scale score among the three institutions
2.

is presented in Table III.

------------a) Social Class:

There was a marked difference in the

social

class composition of the three institutions. At Menninger Hospital
the population was predominantly upper class; at Hillside Hospital,

class;
lower class.

middle

b) age:

and

at Massachusetts Mental Health Center, predominantly

There were no differences in age

distribution in the

institutional populations.
c) Education: The populations differed in educational attain~
ment, with patients having more years of education at Menninger

Hospital than at Massachusetts Mental Health Center. While bl per
cent of the patients at MMHC had not completed high school, only 32
per cent at Hillside and 23 per cent at Menninger did not graduate.
d) F Score: Significant differences in the distribution of
scores on the California F Scale were observed. Fifty-one per cent

�-7of Menninger patients had F scores below 30, and only eight per cent
with scores of 50 or above -- the higher F scores being associated
with higher degrees of stereotypy. In contrast, at Hillside thirtyone per

cent

of

the patients had

F

scores below 30 while at

MMHC

only twenty per cent were below 30.
Thus, the anticipated differences in the social class of the
populations were observed, as well as significant differences in
educational attainment and performance on the F Scale. These differences permit testing the hypothesis concerning the relation of

sociopsychological factors to the treatment variables

among

the insti-

tutions.
3.

Psychiatric Treatment Variables
a) Selection of Treatment:

Among

institutions, significant-

ly fewer patients at Menninger Hospital (h3%) received somatic therapy
than at Hillside (6h%) or MMHC (68%) as shown in Table IV.
b) Duration of Hospitalization: The three institutions differed
markedly with respect to

patient's length

of stay (Table IV).

Hospital patients were hospitalized longest, with 65% of
patients remaining for twelve months or more, uumynugd to 31 per baht
of the Hillside patients and only 5 per cent of those at the
Massachusetts Mental Health center. The modal stay of the Hillside
group was between seven and eleven months while two-thirds of the
MMHC patients were discharged within six months of hospitalization.
c) Discharge Evaluation: In each hospital, most patients were
evaluated at the time of discharge as "improved" (Table IV). At
Menninger

�-9-

either none or fewer than five cases, thus not permitting a satisfactory intrahospital test of the hypothesis.
2. Intra-Hospital Comparison
With this methodological limitation some trends similar to
that found in the earlier study were observed, although few were of
statistical significance. With regard to selection of treatment,
for example, age and F score were found related at Menninger Hospital
(older and higher F score patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at
both the Menninger and Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients
remaining for the longest period. While such relationships were
significant in these two hospitals, a similar trend was noted at the
MMHC (Table V) where no
patients over ho, but lh% of patients under
the age of 20 remained longer than a year.
Table

V

-----------

�-10DISCUSSION

this

comparison of three voluntary

psychiatric hospitals we
have observed significant interinstitutional differences of patients
in the social variables of years of education and social class, but
not age: in distribution of California F Scale scores: and in each of
the treatment variables -- duration of hoSpitalization, selection of
treatments and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluations.
The expectation that the institution serving upper class patients
In

the longest duration of stay,

higher proportion of
psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata, lower
proportion of patients receiving organic forms of therapy, and poor-

would have

a

est discharge ratings were each confirmed. Similarly, the institution
serving lower class patients evinced shorter periods of hospitaliza—
tion, low proportions of psychoneurotic diagnoses, and better dis—
V

charge evaluations.

It is

our impression

that these differences in psychiatric

treatment are more related to differences in staff attitudes than to
differences in population samples. The contrasts between institutions in duration of hospitalization are great, as are the complexity
of diagnostic formulations, discharge evaluations, definitions of
psychotherapy, and the details and amount of recorded data. These
.stylistic differences cannot be dismissed as merely idiosyncratic
since they follow a pattern related to social differences consistent
with previous

findings.

�-11-

population and treatment variable relationships appear to
be interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff as by the constellation of
Such

history which

patient may present. Such relationships
will be most marked in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 343., where the objective criteria
symptoms or

a

defining diseases of known organic impairment are absent, as in
schizophrenia, psychoneurosis and personality and behavior disorders.
Under conditions of perceptual or situational ambiguity the observer's
attitudes and expectations become the basis for perception and classi~
fication. This view was clearly demonstrated by Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (7) in their study of variations in diagnosis within a
single institution. They observed that patients randomly assigned
to different wards did not differ in type of admission, marital
status, education, age or residence. Significant differences did
occur, however, in diagnoses among the three wards and among three
administrators on one ward. As it is highly unlikely that these
differences were inherent in the population, we believe they are
largely reflections of the attitudes of the examiners.
It is clear that many of the present psychiatric concepts of
diagnosis or clinical evaluation have relatively little meaning when
transferred from one institution to another. If these concepts are
taken literally the results become paradoxical. For example,
Menninger Hospital has the most highly trained personnel conducting
treatment, keeps its patients for the longest time and has fewest

�-12-

patients diagnosed as schizophrenia. And yet, despite these resources
and favorable factors, it reports the poorest treatment results. At
MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a therapist,
which keeps patients for the shortest periods, and which has a higher
proportion of the population classed asschizophrenia, the reported
treatment results are the best.

It is

probable that this study does not reflect the relative
therapeutic efficacy of the institutions. Our data furnishes no
independent criteria for determining which heapital provides the

better care; nor for assessing the comparability of the population
in the degree of

institution's

own

illness.

Since the evaluations are based on the
ratings, we believe that the differences reflect

variations in the criteria used for evaluation of improvement rather
than any intrinsic psychiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study (5) it was postulated that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons of different
social background. It was suggested that the higher the person's
social background the more complex the criteria employed. This has

literally confirmed in the present study, with Menninger's using
tripartite rating compared to the global rating of the other two

been
a

institutions.

considering the syndrome rating on which our
comparative statistical analysis were based, it is our contention
that for lower class persons we are apt to assess improvement in
relation to symptom relief or the patient's capacity to resume work,
while for upper class persbns the criteria stress such complex
Even

�~13-

intangibles as "developing insight", or "working through one's problems."
While these

investigations have again demonstrated the role of
social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been considerably
impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational leader-

ship and the expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly
defined. But the differences in institutional style making it difficult to obtain comparable data are important cues to the problem of
the conventional use of comparative statistics, especially in the

evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of discharge ratings,
diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria
in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable
populations are subject to considerable error unless the institutions
are clearly matched for social class patterns in patient population
and for staff attitudes and style. These difficulties may also extend
to the

failures of scientists to

confirm observations made in other

laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may be as much a reflection
of differences in populations and psychiatric criteria as to errors in
the original hypotheses. The widespread use of such terms as "schizo—
phrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore the changes in psychological
or biological features with mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative

results.

Even were a

valid observation to be

reported from one laboratory, we do not have methods available to
describe populations adequately to provide a sound confirmation.

�-111-

Increased attention must be paid to the methodological problems of
classifying subjects by "objective" criteria rather than the present
methods which appear to be so highly dependent on institutional and
observer attitudes and the sociopsychological aspects of the thera-

pist-patient interaction.

�-15..

SUMMARY

and

CONCLUSION

In three psychotherapeutic-oriented teaching hospitals,
population characteristics were related to treatment variables.
1.

Populations were defined by social class, age, education and F score,
and were related to type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diagnosis and discharge evaluation.

Significant interinstitutional differences were observed in
characteristics of patient social class, years of education and
distribution of California F scores, but not age.
3. The variations in treatment characteristics among institutions were found to be significantly different in the predicted
direction.
h. These variations in psychiatric practices follow a pattern
consistent with social class differences among institutions and are
not regarded as being idiosyncratic.
S. The differences in institutional style make comparisons of
diagnoses, duration of hospitalization, and treatment results between
2.

institutions difficult and tenuous, and the need for more objective
criteria of classification of populations is emphasized.

�REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,

R.N.:

Authoritarian Personality,

The

New

York, Harper

&amp;

Brothers,

1950.

Hollingshead, A.B.:
graphed

Two-Factor Index of Social Position, mimeo-

publication.

Hollingshead, A.B. and Redlich, F.C.:

Illness:

A

Community

Study,

New

Social Class and Mental

York, John Wiley

&amp;

Sons,

Inc.,

1958.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Factors in the
Selection of Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside
£332., 9: 216-228, 1957.
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental Hospital:
Kahn,

Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,
Arch. Gen.

Psychiat.,

l:

S65-57h, 1959.

R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Social Attitude (California F Scale) and Convulsive Therapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis.,

Kahn,

130: 187-192, 1960.

Psychiatric Orienta—
tion and Its Relation to Diagnosis and Treatment in a Mental
Hospital, Amer. J. Psychiat., 116: 127-132, 1959.

Pasamanick, B., Dinitz, S. and Lefton, M.:

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification
Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality

Alcoholism, Chronic

Infantile Personality

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Sociopathic Personality

Alcoholism

Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,

Schizo-Affective

Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of
At Time of

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved
Unimproved
Syndrome
Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

Clinical Condition

Hospital Discharge

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Improved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

1;;

InterhOSpital Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Hillside

Menninger

Hospital

Social

Class

'v“

N

(87)

(133)

I

31%

7%

(72)

3%

20

28

III

17

3h

13

IV

1

3h

28

v

o

5

28

x2=121.5; df=8z p&lt;.001
'N

(100)

(173)

(95)

19%

19%

15%

20-39

59

58

52

ho

22

23

33

+

x3=3.9; df=h; p=n.s.
(100)
(173)

&lt;12

Education

Center

'

51

N

Years of

Mental Health

I

II

&lt;20
Age

Hospital

Massachusetts

i

(91)

23%

32%

h1%

12-15

Sh

51

h9

16

23

17

10

+

v3=9.7; df=h; p&lt;.os
(92)

(163)

(76)

10~29

51%

33%

20%

30-h9

hl

50

50-70

8

N

F

Score

17

L

i
2

I

y3=39.2; df=hi p&lt;.001

38

h2

.

�TABLE IV

InterhOSpital Differences in Treatment Variables
‘Menninger

Hospital
(100)

N

Type

of

Treatment

Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health
(173)

Center
(89)

Psychotherapy

21%

36%

2b%

Somatic

h3

6h

68

Other

36

~-

8

1

e

a

_

_u

,

xi:82.8: df=h: p&lt;.001

N

Duration of

Hospitali—

zation

&lt;7

months

7-11 months

:il

months

(100)

(173)

(95)

22%

27%

67%

13

h?

27

65

31

S

a

’

X2=9o.6; df=h§ p&lt;.001‘
N

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation
.

Much

(99)

(172)

(88)

1%

23%

28%

Improved

80

62

61

Unimproved

19

15

10

lvwwy2=29.3; df=h; p&lt;.001

m“

N

Schizophrenia
Discharge
Diagnosis

”

Affective Psychosis
Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorder

(95)

(171)

(85)

h3%

52%

5h%

5

22

17

52

26

29

,

X2=23-83 df=h; p&lt;.001

�TABLE V

Duration of Hospitalization BX,A§2

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

£53

Menninger

Hillside

mag

Below 20

81

h2

1h

20-29

73

36

30-39

61

30

h0-h9

30

20

50+

36

�A?

9/7

.

THE AMERICAN PSYCHOANALYTIC ASSOCIATION
SUMMARY AND FINAL REPORT

OF
THE CENTRAL FACT-GATHERING COMMITTEE

/f"

’4-4-‘"?;"é

/L\

W2}

The Central Fact—Gathering Committee was established by this Association
in 1952 and charged with the responsibility Of setting up a method for pooling :the significant data of psychoanalytic practice. Starting modestly and testing a procedure
that ensured professional secrecy, it was hoped that increasingly valid, meaningful
data might be accumulated. However, the long-recognized difficulties -- diagnosis,
nomenclature and measure of effectiveness -- all have led to increasing resistance
and a resultant falling-Off in the number of completed questionnaires. Scarcely
any
reports are now being received.

Therefore, it was recommended at the last meeting of the Association that
this Committee be discharged and its materiel stored until such time as further developments warrant confidence in the use of the statistical method in psychoanalytic
validation.

\7

This summary of the material is being sent to you for your study and files.
Although some members of the Committee thought otherwise, the Committee as a
whole, the Executive Council and the membership at the last Business Meeting of
the Association in December, 1957 approved the opinion that none of this material be
published. It is not that the figures can be used to prove analytic therapy to be effective or ineffective, but that the material on which either opinion may be based is
inadequately established, and controversial publicity on such material cannot be of
benefit in any way. We trust that all will agree and will limit discussion of this

‘

material to those professionally qualified to recognize its serious limitations.

is divided into two sections: Part I, the summary of the material from the Initial Questionnaires, and Part II, of the material from the Final Questionnaires.
This summary

‘

PART I

We received a total Of about 10, 000 Initial Questionnaires and 3, 000 Final
Questionnaires, from about 800 participants. Of the 800, about 350 were members of
the then total membership of 530, and 450 were senior candidates of the then total
600 senior

candidates.

SUMMARY OF DATA FROM INITIAL QUESTIONNAIRES

1. Sex:

Male: 48%.

2. Race:

v“ "114’

or

i'TéIIW?“IMI—TNT

315' 51;; g L);
(“lgﬂﬂIPV
iﬂfﬂ uuunwﬂkz
”v,
jQihﬁjﬁyrf
HaAll. n F.
F7!

:~

,

,LCJHJE:
.

[2‘3

,_
rf'
355:3
_ ,

White: 99%.

Female: 52%.

(U.S. Census: White: 89%. Colored: 11%.)

�3.

Age 9;

patients:

Percentage of total

Up to 12 years:

2
2

13-18

14
48
27

19—25

26-35
36-45

‘

46 and over:

8

4. Highest educational level: 60% of all patients are at least college graduates.
(25% college graduates, 8% attended graduate school, and 27% more completed
(U.S.Census: 6% are college graduates.)
graduate schooll)
.

:

5. income:
1—5

.

%
%

‘
1

in analysis:
in psychotherapy:

22
35

U.S.Census:

71

6-10
25

(In thousands)

11-15

28

16
13

23

6

'

16-20

21-40

8

9

'

1

16

13

41.69
4
2

Over

560,303
3
Z

(over $10,000)

6. Previous treatment:
Regardless of type of diagnosis, about 1/ 6 or 1/7 of all patients had had previous
analysis. 1/3 of the cases of neuroses and 1/2 of the cases of psychoses had had
previous psychotherapy. Some had had both. About half of the cases of psychoses
had had previous psychiatric hospitalization, as did 1/10 of the cases of neurotic
reactions and character neuroses.

cases being re-analyzed (i.e. , 1/6 of all), only about 1/6 of them
are being re.analyzed by the previous analyst. The other 5/6 chose another
analyst .
Of the group of.

7. Present treatment:
54% Of all cases in treatment are listed as being in analysis, and 46% in psycho.
therapy. The percentage runs from 60-65% in analysis in the neuroses, to 40% in
analysis in the borderline cases, and 20% in the schiZOphrenias,

8. Place of treatment:
Private oﬁice: 94%. Out-patient clinics:
9

4%.

Psychiatric &amp; general hospital: 1%.

. {reguency of treatment:
%
%

in analysis:

in psychotherapy:

Per week:
1

2

3

4

5

1

6

29

41

20

7

42

33

13

3

6

or more

&lt; 2'
Q1

10. use of psychological projective tests:
The tests are reported as being carried out in approximately 25% of the cases. In
75% of the cases given psychological tests, the clinical diagnosis was in agree.
ment with the tests .

�II.

-3...

213929§§§

Initial diagnoses: The following diagnostic listings are presented with full appreciation of and emphasis on their inadequacy, invalidity, uncertainty and probable
insignificance. It reminds one of Freud's remarks when chided about the lack of
statistics in psychoanalysis, in 1913:
"To compile

statistics is at present impossible.

To begin with, we work with much

smaller numbers than most other doctors who devote so much less time to individuals. Then, the necessary uniformity is lacking which alone can form a basis of
any statistics. Should we really count together apples, peas, nuts? What do we

call a severe case? Moreover, technique changes and what about the numerous
partially analyzed cases and those whose treatment had to be discontinued for external reasons? "
ORDER OF FREQUENCY OF GROUPS OF DISORDERS

Psychoneuroses
Personality trait disturbances (character neuroses)
Per sonality pattern di sturba nce s (borderlines)
Psychotic reactions
Perversions
Addictions
All others
Psychosomatic disorders co-exi stent in:

_

Percent of total

.

39

33
1

l

9
5
2
1

11

'

ORDER OF FREQUENCY OF SPECIFIC DISORDERS

Pas sive-aggres sive personality
Compulsive personality, &amp; Anxiety reaction (each)

16
14

Depressive reaction

SchiZOphrenias
Phobic reaction, Obsessive-compulsive reaction,
personality (each)

Perversions
Conversion reaction,

9
7
&amp;

Schizoid

Emotionally unstable personality (each)
Dissociative reaction, Inadequate personality, Cyclothymic personality,
Paranoid personality, &amp; Addictions (each)
Paranoia, &amp; Manic—depressive reactions (each)
&amp;

Psychosomatic disorders co-existent in:
Some additional data: Of the neurotic

6
5
3
2
1

11

reactions, dissociative, conversion,

de—

pressive and phobic reactions were much more frequent to times more) in
females than in males . Obsessive-compulsive reactions were somewhat more
frequent in males than in females. The diagnosis of anxiety reaction was made
equally in males and females.
(2

3

diagnosis of borderline disorders, "schizoid", "paranoid", etc. , and of
schizophrenia was equally distributed between males and females. Homosexuality
was diagnosed two to three times as frequent in males as in females, as were the
other reported sexual deviations.
The

�We have received about 3, 000 Final Reports. These were on cases that had
been in treatment at the time the CFC- program began, or that began treatment thereafter. As it became increasingly evident that significant figures could not be obtained
because of the previous mentioned lack of uniformity, we confined our study 110 a more
intensive investigation of the neurotic reactions that had ”completed" treatment. We
cannot say what happened to all of the cases that were in treatment during this program,
because only about 1/3 to 1/4 of the cases were terminated during this period. The
following information from the Final Reports may be of interest.

sis,

We found that out of 595 cases of neurotic reactions which undertook analy-

306 were reported

as having been "completely analyzed”, that is, approximately
years. (W ere this study to be continued, this
figure might be higher, as there might be a larger percentage of longer analyses. However, it would not be lower.) Follow—up questionnaires were sent to the participants
who had sent in these 308 " completely analyzed" reports. We received a return of 210
replies, that is 70%. Below is a summary of the supplementary information on the
above Final Reports of "completely analyzed" cases of neurotic reactions:
50%, and the average duration was 3~4

Is there any doubt in your mind regarding the diagnosis?
Did you think there was an underlying psychosis at any time?
Had the patient been in analysis previously?
Was the patient in standard, or classical, analysis?
Of

28%
25%
18%

90%

these

"cured" cases.

45

Yes:
Yes:
Yes:
Yes:

210 supplementary questionnaires received, 80 were listed as
In 35 of these, all of the symptoms were reported as "cured", and in

residual symptoms remained.

In the 130 questionnaires received on "improved"

was moderate in

74

cases, great in 46, and slight in 10.

From the above, one might draw the conclusion

cases, the improvement

that about

97% of

patients

who undertake analysis for neurotic reactions and "complete" it, are "cured" or "improved" . Of the 50% who do not complete their analyses in this group of disorders,
about half discontinue apparently because they were improved. The other half discontinue for "external" reasons primarily, because they did not improve, or were consid—
ered untreatable, transferred to other analysts, or required hospitalization. The most
frequent reason given for discontinuing, apart from being improved, was " external

reasons".

�-5RESULTS IN COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF N EUROTIC REACTIONS

Final

In
Analysis
Reports Analysis Completed Cured Improved Unimproved

Anxiety reaction

-

‘

1,120 cases

335

183

90

35

52

3

70

38

26

11

15

0

cases

85

46

23

11

11

1

Phobic reaction
000-X04 - 500 cases

200

104

61

17

42

2

170

108

43

14

28

1

250

116

63

29

34

0

14110

595

306

117

182

7

50

37

6O

3

OOO-XOl

Dissociative reaction
OOO-XOZ - 175 cases
Conversion reaction
GOO-X03

-

250

Obsessive-compulsive

reaction

OOO-XOS

-

500

cases

Depressive reaction
000—X06

-

700

cases

TOTAL

Average Per Cent:

REPORTED RESULTS IN

Depressive Reactions
Total Final Reports:
In analysis:
Cured
Improved
Unimproved

000-X06

Compl‘d
29

34

Discont'd
30
7
4

Untreatable
Transferred
Hospitalized
External reasons
TOTAL

250
116

Anxiety Reactions
OOO-XOl

Phobic Reactions
000—X04

335
183

200
104

Compl'd Discont'd Compl'd Discont'd
35
52

43

42

12

3

9

2

4

1

7

5

2

7

1O

29

2
1

2
1

63

53

90

93

12

61

43

�-5REPORTED RESULTS IN

Obsessive-Compulsive
Total Final Reports
In analysis
Cured
Improved
Unimproved

Untreatable
Transferred
Hospitalized
External reasons
TOTAL

Reactions,

Compl'd
14
28

OOO-XOS

170
108

Disoont‘d

Cured
Improved
Unimproved

1

441
232

Disoont'd

31

72

0
5
8

2

22

Compulsive PersonalityJ 000-X53
365
237

Compl'd Discont'd
29
77

62

3

l7

4

4

10

10

2

37
135

11

43

65

OOO-XZI

Compl'd

X29

—

234
42

97

Schizoid Personality
000-X42

Disoont'd

4
3
2

*

Compl 'd
5

8
6
3
5

28

Homosexuality
000—X63

82

Disoont'd

l3
9

1

7
i

33

1

34

128

101

4
9

35

109

185

HOSpitalized
TOTAL

Compl'd

OOO-XSZ

6O

1

Untreatable
Transferred

External reasons

Personality,

23

Schiz0phrenia
Total Final Reports
In analysis

Passive—Aggressive

65

CompchL Disoont'd
8

13
1

1

6

10

4

3

3

5

2
8

9

48

22

43

Inall these eight reported cures of homosexuality, follow-up communications indicated assumption of full heterosexual roles and functioning.
*

Thinking it might be of some interest to gather the opinions and general experience of the membership on the expectation of results, the following questionnaire was submitted to the membership about a year ago:

"Given a young person, whom one could analyze four years or more, with
all conditions favorable, what would be your expectancy of result, in percentage, of cure, improvement and failure" -- for a list of neuroses, char—
acter disorders, schiZOphrenia, schizoid personality and homosexuality.
were the opinions:

We received 120 replies from the membership of about 650. These

�-71. 45% expected no cure in any of the conditions.
2. 35% expected a 50-100% cure in the neuroses, less in the character
3.

disorders, psychoses and perversions.
expected a 5~40% cure in the neuroses, less in the other con-

20%

ditions

.

those that expected no cure or a low percentage of cure, 50% expected moderate improvement, 45% great improvement, and 5% slight improvement. Of
those that expected some cures in the various condtions, the average expectancy of
cure was:
Of

. 50% in

anxiety, conversion and phobic reactions.
in dissociation, obsessional and depressive reactions.
in schizophrenia.
4. 20% in homosexuality.
1

2.
3.

33%
10%

If these figures are combined with the reports of those expecting
the
no cures,
percentage of cure would be about half, i.e. , 25% in anxiety cases and
phobias, 15% in dissociation, obsessional and depressive reactions, 5% in schizo—
phrenia, and

10%

in homosexuality.

Our "findings" suggest a higher percentage of ”cures" than the

above opinions. (Please note quotation marks!)

All of the foregoing have been presented before

closed meetings

of the Association and to a number of the societies. Details are available to those
members who request them. As Chairman of the Committee, I should like to thank the
members of the Committee, the membership, and the participating candidates for their
cooperation, advice and criticism.

Respectfully submitted,

HIW:as

1/5/58

Harry I. Weinstock, M.D.
Chairman
Central Fact—Gathering Committee

different times during the past five years the Committee has included: Drs. Leo H.'
Bartemeier, Roy R. Grinker, David Kairys, Lawrence C. Kolb, Lawrence S. Kubie,
Alfred O. Ludwig, Milton L. Miller, Milton Rosenbaum, and George W . Wilson, and
our consulting Statistician, Jack B. Chassan, Ph.D.
At

�Janusry 15; 19590
é

:9: Br. n. rink

art.

R.£. Kuhn and H. 51:111
sunancrs ﬁneiul Payehidtrxa study gt manningcr reuadntien,
3.3“,’ 5‘10. 1959‘

yuan:

arrived in rapuka rhmrudc ‘evnning, atnuary 7, ;nd
ut
tn. Paundttian nsrly t a nuxt sarning. Dr. Irving
rupcrtud
Kurt“: ta. Biractor of tho ﬁ.¥. Xanainqur Munorial Baupital,
.1 panel: zraaious and eaoparativa 1n urtry way. Eu bud
Ill
proyurod the stat: tad patients hatarahand in untiakput1an'at
var visit. 8t:f£ coapsrﬁtion at :11 1:101: wt: oxealltnt.
rhnrn In: guaninc intsrcst in car :tudy and us had intnrusl
Wu

dincuaaiana with maths»: of tho

stati.

Br. Kurtuu Int us ans hi! 05:13: us

air

handgunrtcra In&amp;

and. nrrnnaauunﬂs tnr um kt lﬁﬁﬁrﬁ :11 nppoin$n¢ntc and obtain
‘11 rouardn ind ropcrtn that I: ﬁliirtdu Przar ta «at again;
had tskud a: ta pruvidc him with ma iuiaruﬁtion uncut
I.
indinntin: I11 tun rocord data uttdiﬁ for nut thudy. the
nonienl runawaulibrtrinn and he: auatntuat Iptnt fair 6‘}!
conp1¢$1ng taut. turn: ta dotnil. siuau sat: a! thin inturuatian
was net raudtly avuiltblu in tho ehtrﬁs, ﬁr. xtrtnu aunt t for:
to all t». stat: «twist. in ob$u1n thin inxﬁrnnticn chart noqdnd.
It w¢n1a havc takuu a: pnrh¢pl two nugka ta obtain :11.thu rneard

intornﬁttan aurlclv¢t.

ways.

Thu

a»

“

the patiunts It! caninotud in two
Iatull tasting of
60
worn aollantaé 1n the
tharaday ubaut
pttiantt
$ha
on
and

t¢utod an aging.
:yuanuinn
rlnuinlng attiﬁutu
Pridny,
tautcd indiviaunlly in thtir
reams. baring the Friday tcnting
tart
a uﬂgtr nurt¢ nacnuytuiod at 3% all tinnt.ha that as short the
various putauuta warn locatad and ta intradusu us ts Glah puticnt.
Br. Kartun yartiaipatad in tha udniniutraﬁioa at thg test an the
dinturhad ward and gran It?! 1% ta a to: pittantn himself.
Arrangancntu atrn undo tar tho raeaxﬂulihwnriun ta sand
an tau disahnrxc data can: a manta during ﬁhu next ynnr.
an sgtarday neruxng, priar ta war dapnrturq, a: disuuaaod
with m. 031‘an Murphy, Br. allay Gardner
”lurch
tad Br. Rahart wallontttan. In tddi$1mn, aw dinunnnad garnet:
z! ta: «linieal prusrnn with Dru. Rorbnrt auhlguingcr and Philip

“that”

“lﬁ‘ﬁnn

or our Viuit thanks
ortry objectiva
to tha oxtrauraxntry eaaporttion a: tan manningar atntt,
partinnlnrly Br. x;rtns. tun ltr¢et0r at tho huipxtnl and Eva.
tauntu, thc modicul ruacrau 13hrnr1an. Ehuy war. ‘11 nuts
xraaiaully httpitnblc and and. “a I‘ll-vulcanu and ut hunt.
In unitary

V0

uehiovod

,

3&amp;1143

�7‘,

-.

nay-u

JIRU‘VV

1%:
FRQH:

Br. a. link

art.

svnaxata

ﬁ¢L. Kuhn and

I.

15; 1959;

5103:!

antatl Ptrahiuhria study

Jlnuury 5‘10; 1959*

uﬁ

nhnninsar-rvunégtiqn.

a. arrivad in Tapaku Ehnrtdu atoning, January 7, and
rqpurttd ut tau runndnttun curly' a ncxt attains. Br. Irving
Itrtus ta: Biruetar of ﬁn. 6.3. thningar Hanurinl Balpitnl,
was cx%rnmu1y grngiuuu mad weapcrntivn in OVQ?’ may. 30 haﬂ
yrtynrtd sh: stuff gnu pat$nnt¢ butarokund an tnttaipntian ct
an? vilit. ﬁturt aunyaratiaa at I11 Ivvalu in» axaalloat.
tag». it: cnnutne inturast in an: Iﬁuty luﬂ a: hlﬂ tatarnal
dinausttvnn with unabcrn o: tha staff.
ﬁr. Kurtu: Int an nﬁo h1¢ oxttac I! an: hundquartorl aha
and. arraugnnnnsa In: up %n tantra n11 uppaintncnts and abiain
:11 rtearéu and ropnrtn that u: dusivgd.. trig? ta but G§I$ﬁ8
ha had ankud.uu tn pruvidn bin with an iniurnntiun nhutt
inﬁiotting n11 tun rianvd alt: uoaéod tar mar ntndy. 2h:
uptuﬁ :01: any:
nudietl racirdnlibrnrinu and haw aasiat3nt
«unwitting thcua turn: in datnil. $1300 can: 0: this information
was nut ra:d£1y artil‘blc in sh. ahsrtc, nr‘ Rattan goat u tar:
£9 :11 thc atatt dactarn ta abtuan than internatiun want. aci¢ad.
I$~Vﬂﬂlﬁ hava ﬁakan 1‘ yarhupa tun wash: to obtain all tho roaord
information ourscvaaa
the aatual tuttinc at thu‘pnticntc wan gnuaucttd an in:
nnyu. an fluvial: ukout 60 pntacntn vars eelltutaé in th.
gylanpiun tag tpntoa gm amass. .an rrtany, «a; rcxnining'puttaatu
thy wridty touting
var. tantné ludtvadunlly in that: ragga. ﬂaring
saaw
$0
no they. in:
taunt
ﬁt
neuonpnaicﬁ
as
all
I uttti aura.
variant patiuutl wart lﬁﬂltid qua to intraduau as to naah patient.
Br. tartan partiaipntgd in Eh. téuiniatrution at thp tun! an tbs
diatarbod ward and gran ggvc at ta a In: pntiantl hinant.
Arringauantt wart ugd¢ tor tho rgeerdtlihrnritn ta 30nd
In the dinahlrxa data «an: a lauth ﬁuring thu nmxt ymar.
on antardny-morniux. print ta gar d¢purtnrc nu digcuuand
rtactr¢b nativitlna with nr.0%x§mma'nurphy, Br. £11.: euranar
aaa 9r. iﬂhltt waxlumataia. In .dditiau, I. dinuuaaca anptati
giltho ulinietl procran with Dru. Earhart achltaiagtr tad ﬁhilip
‘ﬁﬂﬂﬂa

In summary it anhicvnd_tvury ahagat1Vt or an: viast thunk:
ta th: axtrtorainury anuparatgan g: tho Hunnincsr utatt,
and Era.
pnrtioulurly Br. Knrﬁmt. in: ﬂirtator a! :5. hospital moa£
$3:
wart
rhuy
nodisul-rnaorﬁs
all
librartua.
xntntu,
[racinuuly hatyttgblt and and. In Incl tblaﬂlﬁ and at boat.
ILK:JB

��wwwmgunm
ﬁummﬁmmmhmmhwbmlw
mswm‘mwmmmwwwmnwmw

2mm

“WgLoW

numm

�Jun! 17’ 1959;

Dr. Hilton Graanblatt,

Haosachusetta Hontal Health Cantor,
72-7h Fonsood Road,
Boston, 15, lane.
Dear

Kilt:

I want to take thio opportunity to
parsonally thank you and your Staff for the
excellont cooperation shown the Billoide workers
during their racont visit. They returned laden
with considerable data and enthusiastic about
the spirit and onthuaiasa manifested by your
Staff. I an aoot grateful for your oooporation.

/

sincerely yours,
,

,.

éox Fink, H.D.

foJB

�����Q4:

mmmnwm:mun.nm:mmw
mamas
'

"

wMMummuanmmu
_gm“, Mm.

uuuwuﬁumnmuumazr-

hunt“.

"

“mama. 7pm.; mm
«m,
a gm mm m mm:
'

V»4,.ﬁ,_,§.,..r*

3.

Age" A

tu

Miamiwnuanhmmummumh‘

��1/”
[W
W
J7

fké,

fax»:

.7

.2

=_7

adv/O

gala; ,Afuuzs

a CH“;

;

NV/
g
xY/

A

A3

/

‘3~*‘~/7::¢4

-

ls-

925“
'0’?

4a

9

09%

W [W751

13.9140

4

dew/9,567

)

M42

ﬂF/ﬁf.

J adeN‘

&gt;

.7

Fm”.

MM
5% F

A?”

ﬂu—

ﬁnk. fut.

#mmduiui’

Fay: Q.

�APR 5

I!!!
HOSPITAL

1. nillnidt
2. nonningar
3. Hnn¢* nautil

2,3,k.

PATIENT HUMBER

5.

SE:

6,7.

AGE

Ectlth

1. Kilo
a. Funnio

--,
on.

Exact

no

Ago
,

intnrn;ti¢n

RAGE

1. Whit.

Euro
0th.:0. la inrornntien
2.

3.

RILIGIGH

1. Pratauttnt
2. c;thalie
3. J¢ n
09. in“ r nu inxorattion

10.

szArua‘

KARIYAL

1. Bingld
2. marriud
3. separated
h. Divorecd
5. Widow‘d
6.

la intaruttioa

anueArIol
1. l¢n¢
2. 1~6 yuarn
3. 7

h, .

a

s 9’11

‘

o

6 . 12
7t

13-15

a . 16

9 . 17*

e . nu

internatiaa

uma

�«.2...

12.

PLACE

1.

2.

0! 31313

USA

reroitn tern: lagliah Bpatking

'
'

3.
h.
5.
6.
7.
8.

o.
13.

21‘38

1.
2.

3c
.
gammy

‘

‘
9‘-

F‘

O
C‘

U
amrunwb

4t

O

.
“”6

o‘

u

90

0.

15,/9

n

*

'

"

I

u
*

*

ﬁ

:
x

H

I

t
I
1

countricl

Girntnia &amp; Scandiuu
tvinn
Ittly
Prune. &amp; aplin
slavie natiaun
Latin Ancriet
ethnr
In internation

I! 9.5.A.

lativv beta
Lap: thua
1*h

1

S~9

10~19

29.29
30+

30

infatuation

69

at

79»?!
89-69

1...

90~99
16¢~199
110~119
120~12y

1 0‘13?
1 0*

Ia intarmation

163 A? FIRE! PSYCHIATRIC 363156!
-.. lxaet Ag.

inrornltion
PATIEIT'S sachL CLASS
1. 61:” 1
2. class 2
00“ He

3o

01".

h. 81:”
§.v 91:0: 5
9. 5113301“!
IBHIIR

:

OF PRIOR HOﬁPITALIﬁATIONB
«a

murmur-i

9.
0.

«I

8*

Ho

intomuntion

�.3...
TOTAL PERIOD OF PRIOR

xxrxnxxxczs
Lola than 1 nonth
1-5 not.
6’11 ‘0. t

HOﬁPITAL

1.
2.
3.

h.
5.
6.
7.

‘Ow

0.

12~17

not.

1%-23 “58¢

2h~35 non.
36-h? mac.
h3~59 ”0‘.
5+

No

year:
internation

COHDITION A? DISCHARGE

2.
3.

Hueh‘inprovod; rocovarod
Inprovod
Unchangod or Ilightly wort.

o.

Ho

1.

a.

Docctncd

informatien

913081861

OR

DIAGH0313

l.
2.

ESTABLISHED

Psyahauis: Schiaephrcnic reaction
Paychenia: Afroetiva rotations

3. Payeheniﬁz

Dynamic

h. Paychonnurotie Bisordcr
5. Pornonulity Dinardnr

6‘ Transient Situational Peranality
ls
0 Ha inlermatian
General
Paychothornpy
30?

TREATMEHT:

+3
no

internatian

TREtTEEﬁTT
IRELTHEBT:

1.
2.

easia#¢——

Psychotherapy
Payeheanulyais
Paychethnrapy: ”.9.
Psychethortpyc 0th.:
Gran; Thcrnpy

Unlpoaiticd
Ho

psy¢hethorapy

lo infatuatien

�“aTREATMENT:

1.

2.

Hoprob., dopral, oqunnil

h.

1 + 2
1 + 3
2 + 3
1 + 2 + 3

3.

S.

6.
7.

8.

29/

ORGANIG

Phonothyaninou (OP,P,Tr11

9

C

O

O

Tafranil

Gthor

organic trcatunnt

Ne

intermatian

Ho

LENGTH 6F HOSPITALIZATION
BEFORE GRGAHIC TREATMENT

Lo:a than

t‘
11- 2

M?“

weeks

menths

k'

5:6

78
9-10

omwmmru

1 waak

u

"
"

11 + months

No

25.

infcrmation

LE GTE OF CURRENT HOSPITALIZATIE
Under 1 menth
t
v-

t
o
wmwmmrwmwu

I

2
3

manths

months
h-S manths
6 months
7~8 months

9-11 month:
12 month:

(1‘.

2?, 2-

.

.‘

13+ months

No

informtticn

"F"

SCORE
—-. a exact

00.

~

Ha

scorn

information

)

�0

\, $550014’o

s 0%
'P

~_/”‘

A

§

PA-

N A M H

G H

‘1”

a

f

‘64,

.

,
'_

«a

V

’4L Raﬁ»

Psychiatric

Group

Association for

Health
Insurance Inc.

Mental Health

Association

PROJECT SPRINO7-6000. Ext. 399

RESEARCH
22' FOURTH AVNUE.

NEW VORK3N.V-

(Invettigation Into the Insumbility 0f Pch/aiatric Treatments)

Helen H. Avnet, Proiect Director

November 28,

ADVISORY COMMITTEE

l 960

Harvey J. Tompkins, M.D.
CHAIRMAN

lea

Perlis
VICE-CHAIRMAN

A. Oakley Brooks
Martin Cherkasky, MD.
John M. Cotton, M.D.
Jack Elinson, Ph.D.
Sylvan s. Furman
David Goldstein, MD.
Clarkson Hill
Paul H_ ”och, M.D.
William A. Horwitz, M.D.
Lothar B. Kalinowsky, M.D.
Mack Lipkin, M.D.
Henry B. Makover, M.D.
Martin E. Segal
Leo Srole, Ph.D.

Partic£9ating PSYChiatri-Sts

FROM:

Harvey
P

J.

Tompkins ,

M. D.

and John

M.

Cotton,

1...;

Participating

Psychiatrists, the Project, covering a sample group
Of 76’ 000 Persons’ has been
operating satiSfaCtorll-y
Since July 1,1959

HarrYl.Weinstock,M.D.
Bernard Wortis,M.D.

Attached

msma

is

a

report

pating psychiatrists,

REPRESENTATIVE COMMITTEE

Int erest 1‘18-

MANHATTAN:

John M. Cotton, M.D.
CHAIRMAN

An

on our survey of particithink you will find

Which we

address recently

made by

ArthurHH. Harlow, Jr.

PrESident of Group Health Insurance, Inc., on the first,
year' 5 experience under the Project, will be summarized
in the December issue of the Bulletin of the New York
State District Branches of the American Psychiatric

KINGS:

Morton H. Hand, M.D.

BRONX,

Jacobo. S-Jaeger,M.D.

QUEENS:

ArthurW.Schappe|l,M.D.

Association.

NASSAU:

Irving Chipkin, M.D.

If

SUFFOLK:

Robert Wagner, M.D.
WESTCHESTER:

Miltiades Zaphiropoulos, MD.

write us
r equ est.

you would like additional information please
and we will be happy to comply with your

NEw JERSEY:
David Flicker, M.D.

DEPARTMENT
EXPERiﬁ'l {ﬁlial

or

”ii

PSYEW

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS.N

NOVZ 31960

M. D.

sycuratric Research Pro;. ect

Thanks to the cooperation of our

S.

APA

T02

SUBJECT ..

.

.

National

American

I

1

ulna! Illness (3

Me

Financed by National Institute of Mental Health and Group Health Insurance, Inc.

�QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF PARTICIPAIING PSYCHIATRISTS

possible aid in the eventual evaluation of results of treating Project
professional qualifications and customs of
participating psychiatrists.
As a

cases, a survey was conducted on the

age, sex, and

for

participants,

returned questionnaires. In addition, data on
qualifications were obtained from the latest medical directories
of the non-reSpondents.

Of 1150

many

1008

In order to encourage the broadest possible response, the questionnaire was
limited to one page with a dozen questions in all, mostly check-offs, and with
space provided for comments.

are:

From

the Project's point of View, the most important findings of the survey

(1) The great majority of participating psychiatrists are well
qualified, judging by accepted standards in the field.
(2) Over three-quarters of participants regard themselves as
primarily analytically and psychologically oriented in their approach
to treatment.

‘

é‘EX, AGE;.,L9.CATION

- (Tables

1

- 3)

More than half the participants are between 35 and 49
years of age. About
every tenth participant is a woman. The majority practice in Manhattan, although
the suburbs are fairly well represented.
TABLE 1

—

SEX OFﬂgAgILQIPATING

PSYCHIATR;§1§#

Male
Female
TABLE 2

-

AGE

1001 (88 per
138 (12 per

cent)
cent)

Dl§IgIBUTION
Age Group‘

Egmbgr

28-34

187
204
144
224
168
99

35-39
40-44

45~49

50-54
55-59
65

60-64
and over

Total
*excludes those who have resigned or

in Group

71

42

1139*
who

have died

ger Cent of Total
16.4
17.9
12.6
19.7
14.8
8.7

6.2
3.7

100.0

�Page 2.
- AREA OF PRACTICE

TABLE 3

Number

Area
Manhattan
Brooklyn

in Area

Per Cent of Total
57.0

649
98

8.6
5.2
1.9

59

Queens
Bronx

22

Staten Island
New Jersey

.4

5

6.4

73

7.0

79

Nassau

Suffolk

4.3
5.8

49

Westchester

66
16

Rockland

Other

Total

~23

1.4
2.0

1139

100.0

TYPE OF PRACTICE

participants confine their practice to hosPital work. The majority
Forty-three per cent treat only in the
treat
office, referring their hospital cases to colleagues.
Seven out of ten answering this question (1000) report that they also do
out-patient clinic work.
Only 17

both office and hospital patients.

QUALIFICATIONS

Of 1096

either

participants for

whom

information is available,

cent are

85 per

Diplomates of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology or are ”Board

per cent are qualified as psychiatrists, with an ”SI"
rating, under the New York State Workmen's Compensation law. 0f the remaining
13 per cent, 6 per cent are accredited as psychiatrists by the New York State
Department of Mental Hygiet e, with the "QP" rating, and 7 per cent meet the quali—
fications for membership in the American Psychiatric Association.

eligible." Another

Table 4 shows
TABLE

two

this over-all distribution,

and Table

5

breaks

it

down by age:

4 - QUALIFICATIONS

DPN*
DPN

‘

.

Number

Per Cent

Cumulative Per Cent

585

53. 4
31. 8
2.1

53.4
85.2
87.3

7.1

100.0

eligibility only* 349
23
SI rating only**
61
QP rating only***
78
APA membership only
Total

Known

1096

5.6

9239

100.0

*Diplomate, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology
**Qualified as psychiatrist under New York State Workmen' 3 Compensation Law
"
"
***
by New York State Department of Mental Hygiene
-

�TABLE 5

- QUALIFICATIONS

Page 3.

AND AGE

Per Cent of Age Group with
Boards or Eligibility SI Rating Only

Age Group

28-34

90

40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59

89
-

60-64
65 and over

'All Groups (Total Reporting1096)

*less than

1

*
*

80

35—39

2

87
90

3

86

2

71

68

8
10

85

2

*

per cent

ORIENTATION

invitations to participate in the Project were issued, reasons for nonparticipation were also solicited. Most refusals were based on the practitioner's
analytic orientation: The 15 sessions provided by the Project were felt to be far
from adequate in terms of the respondent's usual ”A-P” (analytic and psychological)
When

approach to treatment.

Since the "D-0" (directive—organic) and eclectic practitioners were more apt
to be optimistic about the effectiveness of short-term therapy, there seemed a
possibility that enrollment from these groups might dominate the list of participants.
This theory was effectively demolished by the survey. Of over 1000 respondents, 77 per cent checked ”analytical and psychological” as their primary orientation, 10 per cent checked "directive and organic,” and 13 per cent checked "other",
usually specifying "both” or a combination of the other two such as "organic and

psychological.”

Although the majority with the primary A-P orientation exists at every age
level, it becomes less of a majority with each age increment, so that what starts
out as a 92 per cent A-P orientation, in the youngest group, comes down to a 53
per cent A-P orientation in the over-60 group, as shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6

-

PRIMARY ORIENTATION AND AGE

.

Age Group

Per Cent of Each Age Group with Specified Primary Orientation
Other
A-P
D-O
Combination

28-34
35~39

92
89

2

3

40-44

85

3.

50-54
55-59
60 and over

76
61

10
21

45~49

All Groups(Total
Reporting 1002)

6
8
12

53

25

14
18
23
22

77%

10%

13%

59

18

�Page 4.
A primary orientation toward one approach does not of course mean that an
individual will always use that approach. A psychiatrist who is primarily A—P
oriented may use organic approaches on occasion, as shown below.

ATTITUDES

TOWARD

DRUGS,gSHOCK THERAPY, GROUP THERAPY

Drugs appear to be almost a

universal tool

among

psychiatrists

(98

per cent).

0n shock therapy and group therapy, there were far fewer answers, and it is
impossible to evaluate whether a non-response indicates a negative attitude or an
oversight. But a comparison of the number responding to each question may in itself
be indicative to some extent of the degree of acceptance achieved by each method of
treatment. The total responses and the percentage of affirmative answers follow:

Total

QEEEEEQE
Do

"
H

you
"

drugs?
prescribe
”

I!

Per Cent Affirmative
98

952
693

shock therapy?
group therapy?

H

Number of Answers

75

51

69".

A cross-tabulation of the answers to these questions with the primary practice
orientation of the respondent shows that the use of drugs and shock treatment is not
a distinguishing characteristic of any group, although the non-A-P's are much more

apt to

recommend shock

therapy than their colleagues.

- PERCENTAGE OF REPORTING PSYCHIATRISTS

TABLE 7

AND GROUP

WHO PRESCRIBE SHOCK THERAPY, DRUGS,
THERAPY, BY PRACTICE ORIENTATION

Per Cent of Each Orientation Who Prescribe -

Practice Orientation

Shock Therapy
68

A—P

D-O

92
90

Combination

Drugs

Group Therapy

100
100

50

54
34

97

There appears to be no dearth of personnel ready to administer shock therapy
this) or to conduct group therapy (208 checked this).

(247 checked
FEES
A

question was asked as to differentiation between fees for initial consultatior
Of 981 respondents, 45 per cent do differentiate, 55 per cent do not.

and treatment.
The

question as to the respondent's usual fee for a private office session

brought 987 responses, of which 789 were explicit, 198 stated a range. In other
words, 20 per cent of the respondents do not have a set fee. For most of these, the
range indicated was either $15-$20 or $20-$25, but there were instances of a twentydollar spread in the usual fee - e.g.,"$lS-$35" or"$30—$50".
For those

stating

a

definite usual fee, the distribution is as follows:

Usual Fee

$15
$20
$25
$30 or more

Per Cent Charging
11

49
36
4

�Addendum:
PSYCHIATRISTS

AND THE OPERATION

OF THE PROJECT

Because of the enthusiastic response of psychiatrists to the Project, one of the
disappointments of the first year's Operations was the relatively small number who
actually saw a Project patient - fewer than a third of the participating psychiatrists.
This includes cases treated by more than one psychiatrist, and multiple cases in the
same family (usually treated by the same psychiatrist). The number of psychiatrists
and patients* seen by each was as follows:
Number of

Psychiatrists

Number of

201

1

Each

1

63
21
15
8

4

Patients
2

3

4
5
6

each

7 ,8,9,10,11

*Excluding cases having hospital care only.

Psychiatrists having a
in relatively short supply.

number of

cases are usually child psychiatrists,

who

are

all participating psychiatrists, the psychiatrists who treated
on the whole somewhat better qualified (91% vs 87% having Boards
eligibility) and somewhat less primarily A~P oriented (67% vs 77%). The

Compared with
Project cases were

or Board

treatment. they rendered was mostly individual office psychotherapy. Four per cent
of the cases were hospitalized; seven per cent received shock therapy (including
hos—
pital cases); three per cent received group therapy; seven per cent received psychological testing. Ig_thi£ty-five per cent of the office
drugs were prescribed
at one time or another during the course of treatment. cases,
0n the basis of the few (36) Project cases treated by two or more doctors, it
would appear that psychiatrists are rarely in exact
agreement about the diagnosis of
a particular case. In 12 cases there was a basic difference as to the severity of the
condition, with one doctor calling it a psychosis, the other something less severe.
In four additional cases there was a difference as to major category (usually neurosis
or personality disorder). In another six, there was a partial
difference as to major
category, with one doctor calling it a mixed diagnosis; and in another 9, there was

agreement as to major category but differences appeared in the sub-categories.
cases there were identical diagnoses in 5.

36

Out of

Another demonstration of the individuality of
psychiatrists emerged during
attempts to classify frequency of treatment under the Project. Although six specific
classifications were available for coding purposes, 42 per cent of the cases fell into
the ”other” or non-classifiable category. Pursuit of this led to a fascinating variety of frequencies of individual office visits, each adding up to exactly 15 visits
(the Project limit). There are combinations extending from two months (6 visits one
month, 9 the next), to seven months (4,1,2,2,2,3,1; or
and in between
come all sorts of combinations spreading the visits overl,5,4,2,l,1,1),
3 or 4 or 5 or 6 months.

far as is

to the Project administration, there has been a negligible
unfair advantage of the
Certain difficulties inevitably arise with thbse who do not read their mail orplan.
and there
instructions,
are occasional misunderstandings resulting from patients belatedly identifying them—
selves as Project-eligible. As far as can be determined, broken appointments are not
a serious source of difficulty. In general, the Project has generated the enthusiasm
and cooperation which sometimes characterize pioneering ventures.
So

known

amount of abuse, or attempts to take

GHI’APA—NAMH RESEARCH PROJECT

(for the period 7/1/59~6/30/60)

�I:

12/26/60

Social Glaxo, Diognooio, ond Irootnoht
In Throo Psychiotrio Hospital:
In 1958, Bolliugohood and Rodlioh pahliohod on

influontiol voloto, (1); in
ohipn botvoon

mat

it

tho: roportOd roiotion-

social class) diognooio, tad tho troot-

or loan]. dioordon.

and Pink (2)

which

During 1958, Kohn, Pout ok

roportod studill

tt

not lhOﬂn that who: oduootioh

or oooiol slain,

Hilllido Hoopitol vhoro
woo

it It! roiotod to

toad

who

on

to iodox

on: rotorrod for

convulsivo thoropy, one to tho thoropoutic rouponto to

this trootnont inotrunont.
Tho

Bollinglhood ohd Rodlioh study

It:

oorriod out

bororo tho oo-oullod 'tronquili:inz“ drugs oohiovod wido

populority.
thoropy
ooooo

oloo

demo

Tho Kohn,

at a facility,

woo

hood.

roportod, for CSﬂIplﬂg thot drug

tho prinéipol thoropy in only b.31 of tho

tho: otudiod.;

thoropy
won

it:

It won

whoro

Pollock o rink study

woo

ot tho tino, oonvultivo

tho major organic thorlpoutio dovioo which

�i3Tvvor the heepitele were well
The

third

was

the research hospital of a state hospital

system etteohed to e

its ﬁetiente

private facilities.

known

university medical center. Heat of

were voluntary ednieeionl.

Each of

the

heepitele were peyohoenelytieelly oriented

and each

institution maintained affiliations with

local analytic

institute.

The

hospitals

were

loceted reepectively in the

aid-West. Riddle Atlantic, and
The

queetioee

we

e

New

England.

wished to answer in

relation to

social classes for the different hospital settings were:
(1) What is the relation of patient social class to

(a) diagnosis, (b) treatment, and (o) length of
he

(2)

hospitalisation.
For these varieties, are there differences between

heepitele vhioh treat different

model

close groups?

Pppuletion a Hethodolegy:
During the Winter 1958~1959, e research team
each of the three

hospitals.

population of each hoapitﬂ.

The
who

visited

total adult in~petient

were

hospitalized

on

�~11»

voluntary cartitieatan
day.

Each

patient

word

was then

at hi: hospitalizatien

on

studied in a given viaitatioh
followed through the course

and information

regarding his

treatmant, langth of hospitalization and discharge status
was

appended

xjﬁlxiai to tha data ahaata for each patient studiad.

All patients discharged tron this hoapital within aightaan
months

after the study

began, were indluded in the sample.

This included approximately minty per cent of the

originally studied. Eollingahead
position
and

was emphasised which

aducational scores.

farred to

it

two

factor index of social

utilizes

Data for each

Eollingshead cards to

weighted occupational

patient

I? and

V.

trans~

on

thc

p

u‘i.05 laval.

Class Diatributian within Hogﬁitala:

In Hospital "A“; 311 or the

classes I

was

facilitata statistical

analyaas. Significanccs were computed
Results:

patiaata

and

II,

12$ to Class

In Haapital

Claaaes I and

II,

3&amp;5

'3',

III,

271

in Class

patients

warn aaaignad

ta

and 571 to 615330:

at the patients ware in

III,

and

39%

in Clauses

IV and

I.

�-5-

'0',

In Hospital

III,

Glass
modion

82%

and 1‘ in Class IV.

class

patients

have

I and II,

worn in Classes

of

Viowod

17%

in

in turns of the

its pationts, Hospital

the highest status (Rd: Cleo:

A's

II), Hospital

G's, the lowest (Ed: Close 1!) and Hospital B's petionts

fall

between tho two, (Nd: Cleo: 1119.10r purpuo of olooo~

ifiontion

we

visualize Hospital

A

no

treating primarily

upper close groups of patients, Hospital

close group, and Hospital 0,

a lower

B,

a middle

class group.

Hospital and Diggnosis:
Comparing the

proportion of

its patients

which ouch

hospital diagnosed as oithor psychotic or non-psychotic,
we

found

oigniticnnt diagnostic differences between institu-

tiono (:2 - 12.73; df- 2;
tended to

treat

p4

.01). In the hospital which

predominantly lower close petionto, 75 For

cont of-ull the patients were considered psychotic; in-tho

hoopitol treating predominantly the middle class group,
7h! per cent were diognoood as psychotic, while in tin

hospital trusting predominlily the oppor class grow),
par cont wore oollod psychotic.

53

�.5.
Social Glace and Dielgceiea

It

in interesting to note some of the diagnoetic

differences in hoepitele,

when

In Classes I and

constant.

II

the class factor
we

found

patients were called neurotic, in Class
neurotic, and in classes

IV and V, 20%

36%

or the

III,

29%

wc-e

kept

was

were

neurotic.

The

direction of these statistics tanded to support the
observation of Hollinguhcad and Redlich but for the

hospitalized patients never theleaa, did not reach
significance
(12

- 5.99,

p

on

.

the 15 level (12

' 5.77; df - 2;

p e

3.8.)

.05).

Hospitals and Treatment:
We

found

differences in the

employment of organic

therapies, 1.0., the peychotrcpic coupenndc
therepiee
p

1n

u.; .01).

and convulsive

the three institutions (12 - 12.12, a:
In the

clue: patients;

hSS

facility

which tended to

at the petiente received

tract
some

-

2,

upper

torn or

organic treatment; in the institution treating middle clues

petiente, abs;
clean pattente,

and in the

th

hoepitnl treating prinerily lover

received crgenic therapy.

�.7Social Clan, Dugout:

ndtrutnnt:

In combined pooulntions or the three hoapitulo, thoro

are differences between the major forms of troahncnt that
psychotic and neurotic patients experience (12
d: - 2;

p

~$.001).

compared with 205 of

In

It!

115$

of the neurotic

were administered to

tho psychotic cacao.

32%

tho

go

Organic thcaapios

of the nourotica and

Patients

or psychotherapy, constituted
1nd kg of

can:

the psychotic tacos, psychotherapy

the dominant trcatmont modality.

wag

' 69-7;

the paychotic cocoa.

who
23%

It

I!

76%

of

received neither organic
of tho neurotic cocoa
has been shown

thot within

hospital settings studied, organic forms of therapy

worn

frequently given to psychotic than nourotic patients.

morc

In touting tho hypothocoa that a higher proportion of lower

class than uppor class patients rocoivo organic forms of
trootnont,

we

round the hyyothosia not to be supported

for

oithor the neurotic or psychotic groups. Within each oocial

clot: group, psychotic patients received organic trootnont
more
was

frequently than uon—poychotic patients but social class

not aigniticantly rclntod to whether or not potionta

�-3...
who

were

either psychotic or noorotio

would

receive organic

thorooy.

Social Class and Length of Hospitalizotion:
When no combined

hospitals,

we

for Class I

&amp;

found

the populttions from the three

that tho

II potionto

hospitalization period

aoan

III

9.2 months, Class

was

and Class IV and V, 7.2 months.

We

found no

9.8 months,

statistical

difference between the lungth of hospitalization or Class

I, II

III patients (t- 1.66,

and

div 196, p - H.S.) but found

significant differences botvoon Class I, II and
patients (t - 7.69, df- 221, ptmm)

IV and

V

.

ggopitalo and Length of Treatment:
The

figures are rotlootod in the different

hospitalization periods that
hospitals.
patients

were found in the

three

In Hospital A, the upper class hospital,

were

hospitalized for

in Hospital 8, the middle class

an

average of

ll

institution, for

montha, and in Hospital C, the lower

S.k months.

mean

months,

8.9

class facility, for

�“9-

Rocapitnlation and Conclusion:
The

primary purooao or this ctudy ha: been to study

the rolationahio of social class and psychiatric diagnosis
and

treatment in hospitals which have available conparablo

facilities.

troutmont

differences, class
which have

We

know

members may

that

baoauso of «coconic

gravitate toward institutions

available different kind: of therapy,

have selected three

hospitals which

and thus we

employ comparable

ranges of therapy and which tend to treat nonbors or different
socioeconomic groups.
“what

In affect, what

is the hospital experience of

oocioocononic groups where

all

we

are thus asking is:

members of

different

forms of thorapy are equally

available?"
Within the

social class

was

hospital cutting described,

we

found

not related to whothcr a person

diagnosed as psychotic or nonvpsyohotio.

Ho

that

was

also found

aooial class to be unrelated to the employment of ergonio
therapy.

We

believe that the relatively wide use that

�-10psychotropic ooopoundo

now

enjoy nay toad to blur tho

sharper diotinotiono whihh oxiotod non. yours ogo than
organic treatment was identified with the shook tad con:

therapies.
We

that lower class position

found

length of time
doooribod.Lowo;

o

was

related to tho

patient spent in the hospital settings
class patients (Glaoaos

IV

&amp;

V) were

hospitalized for anoruﬁormas a: time than Class I, II 0r

III patients.
Major
The

difroronoeo were found between the throo hospitals.

hospital treating upper class patients tended to diognooo

the higher proportion of

its patients

as non-psychotic,

tended to employ a lower comporativo percentage of organic
thoropy, and

left its patients

period oz time.

in treatment for the longest

In contrast, the hospital which tended to

treat patients primarily from the

lower portion of tho ocononio

ooootrnu had the highest proportion of psychotically diagnosod

patients,

onyloyod organic treatment more often than the

other hoopitalo describod, and tort patients in treatmont

for the shortest period of tins.

�.11.
In an

tar

us tau thrac

hospitals studind arc construed,

300131 61188 woulé appear to ho

lass intimataly rclutad to

dingnosis and trantuent than scald the naturu at th. hospitzl itatltg
and the

sacinl gruup tauhieh

it

tddraascs

itself.

�1: 1/3/61
.

soaihl 61:13, DiIIROIil
whrct Paychtatrto

und

trtaincnt 1;

Ht‘pit‘lﬁ

IITRODUCTXOHa

Iva hundrtd and ninety patients in $hr¢a uoau

cuetadinl aetivu trcntiunt ptyehiatria haupitnln,
which

ortcrad multipln tharnpicn, primarily ta typur,

niddlo a: lawn: clnta ﬁcraoul var. Iﬁndaud during
1959*60.

Questions utudicd were whothnr naninl clans £¢r

haspitaltnad paticnta
ﬁypm

It:

ralntod to (a) dingntsil,

a: tr¢ntnen$, aha langﬁh at trautaunt tnd

rahttamhtp at

yum:

suntan-nu»

Cb)

a nun “away",

’miﬁdla', and “tuner” «inns hospitals ta dznauuain,
type a: treatment and longth a: traatnaat.

W!

Volautnurily udaittcd paticnta 1n thrtn

kncvn xucxraphtnclly

47W“.

u/Cc.

f“

V:

atpur:tc httntttll

w¢11~

which

itiﬂrlé

�nan-

: rung. if

thnrup¢ut1¢ prnxruan.

that. putioutu aura

prtnnritr rdprutoutattv. at

$§ﬁ§upptr, 3:831. at

lunar ulnauoa, turn atudiud

t!

s.aluu d:y in thy wintsr,

n! a 311.3 heapittl

19$8~1959

tuilunod thruushaut tacit suntan
and

if

a

Putiontl vcro

hospitalitutsnu

detail: caacorninc that: buneruund, truutuant

nud dtusnunin wart rncurdcd*
33831.93:

Seats}. 6183! was

tau“ ta

ha

r-alaud to lung“:

at notivu truatnnn‘ within tha hotpitnl aettingn.
015': I? and

charm

Y

putt¢nta rtlainad 1n truntnsnt for

pox-ands

a:

an. than. an"

x.

I:

or

m

paticntu. Signittctnt rolutanuuhipc bctwnun 1031‘;
clans, diaguoail ana trtntucut

warn mat uhaarvcd.

sacniticnut rol‘ticnathn war. found bntwu.n
p;t1§nt néubtrthip an upytr,xmiédla and Instr 01‘3t

�inﬂux: and dams“, “aunt. and has“ at
hupiuluutom the nut» in tutwuomu
mum at m "mun, "guitar at Vhﬂhtr a

an: nutwumu
m, that mm mm: tho "My“ ma M man.“
u magma-tun; mu rams." wan-am than”,
and ”mi '56 Mpiullw tu- t!“ lmut yaw-1M at
patio“ m I mum at

‘1‘. a

a

�1: 1/3/61

anuttl Gitul. nzlgntnia ;nd fruuﬁncat 1a
Ebro. Puyuhtatric notpxt;1:
111302301103:

tin

hundrtd nut ninnﬁr patlnusc in thran nth.

custodial ac‘iis trca‘lnnt'ptrchtaﬁrtu knupttnll,
arrdrtd uvlﬁiplo thnrnpioa, ﬁrtaartlr ta appur,

which

gladlo or Inuit «1‘3: pirlﬁﬂl 2‘3. atudand during
‘

19$9~60.

Quautsnas tindiod war. whithar 300151 31.0:
hsnv1%nliutﬁ pntlcntu

it: rnlntad in

(I) din¢n¢nts.

at trausnunt

«:90 a! ircatunat, 3nd 1¢Ig§h

raln‘aonshgp a: Fttitn£ llﬂhirihip a:

and Inngth

$34

th...

‘ntddlc'. ‘ud ”lower“ cln¢a hmlpttnIu-to
ﬂirt or £ruatnant

tar
(3)

'nppcr'.

dianumwzt,

a: trnatunnt.

930039332:

Valuntslrily adsttttd pgtiunta
knuwn

geographiaally Iapnrttc

1n

thr¢t wail-

haipittll which uttarvd

�.2.
3

ring. a! thnrtptutis

progruun, Vhﬂri plttﬁuﬁi warn

prtnlrlly roprcatntaﬁavu a: iﬁiEnppor, ngdéau er
lowcr alumnus, aura Uti‘iid an at n ctvuu hmapitui

«call:

any

in tht‘wiuﬁtr.

tallauod thmaushtu‘

thttt

and 6.13113 unncnrnxug
and

diltnllil

l9$8~1959
BQIrlﬁ

¢

if

Pnttonia var:

hampttnlatuttuu

that! h$ak¢round, trunﬁnnu‘

mutt ruocrﬁad.

Ilﬂﬁlg§x
Benin: ulna: vat fauna to ht rulatcd to langth

at asttro trcntnnnt wt‘han «a; hompttal Ittﬁinsl.
015.: IV and

V

pattan‘u ruuutacd Ln trcntuont {or

thurtar 9.3104: at téuo tuna clan!

pttlthtl. Signifiauat

I, I: at

r¢1m§¢nanhapu

01:33, ﬂtlﬂﬂﬁﬂil nut tr‘aiuomt

lira

:11

bitwcun.taotn1
ﬁat dblorvnd.

aacntttcant rolnﬁiaalhtpa new: round bntugnn
patsaat nadburahip an uyptr, 31441. and luau: «13;:

�human

and

«awn; ”Miami and loan» at

h§Ip1£u1tsatioaa 2h. srnttnr

it: uaataaiaonuntc

Ituiua a: the hanpiQal, rug&amp;raluns a: whither a
puticut

any n ninbnr

gmaup, aha mart

a:

a aiv¢n aacauuaacnumia

11ktly the pat1.n¢ wanié h: diaznaaed

gs nanwpnychoﬁin, wauln rgaeivv neawurgania therapy,
and would be hunpitnliangQr the
$130.

inngsst patina of

�II:

1/10/61

Social Clean, Diegnoeie end Treetnent

in Three Psychiatric Hoepitele
INTRODUCTIOH:

Recent etudiee have indiceted e reletionehip between

eociel clean end peychietric diegnoeie end treatment.
preeent etudy

wee

The

designed to study whether social cleee

for hospitalised patients

wee

releted to diegnoeie, type

of treatment end length of treatment, in three institutions

vith differing eociel cleee

membership of the

patient

populetione.
PROCEDURE:

Two

hundred end ninety

voluntarily admitted patients

to the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital, Hilleide Hoepitel
end the Heeeechneette Hentel Health Center were etudied ea

or e given hoepitel cenene day in the Winter, l958~1959.

Petiente were followed by-e reeeerch teen throughout their
course of hoepitelieeticn end deteile concerning their
beckground, treatment end diegnceie were recorded.

�.2RESULTS:

Sooisl clsss was found to bs mars significant in
coup-risans bstwssn hospitals than in intsr-institutisn

analysis. Within institutions socisl class

was

saluted to lsngth at hospitalisstian snly; class

signiﬁicsntly
IV and

V

patients rsnsinsd in trustmsnt tar shorter psriods thsn

III.

those in clsssss

I, II

hespitsls

significant rslstienships bstvssn social

showsd

sud

Csnpsrison bstwssn

class and disgussis sud trustusnt ss vsll ss lsngth of

hospitslisstion.

The

higher tbs class status of tbs hospitsl,

ths morn likely tho pstisnt would be diagnossd as nonpsychotic, vauld not rsssivs samstic thsrspy and would bs

hospitslissd for s longsr psriod.
hospital

was mars

Tho

class status or ths

importsnt than tbs inﬂividusl patisnt's

clsss msnbsrship in dotsrmining thoss rslstionships.
liIIIUQ

�Junntry 10, 1961.
Dr. Gurdnzr Kurphy,

Diroctor of Research,

Hunningcr Foundition Hoapitnl,
Topeka, Kansas.
Dear Dr. Murphy:

stat:

In 1959, Dru. Siogcl, Kuhn and Pollack at thin
arranzod with Dr. Ksrtuu, ta undarttkc a

canpnrativa population staple study at the in-putiontu
Haulaahulitta Hunts! Hunlth
Hospitals. Tho dtta colltction
ph‘l. at this atudy VII conplotod in Soptunbor, and
V. have prone-sad a large part or the atntiaticn and
and. Ian. prolininary audguonts.
It in our dosiro tn proscnt a comptrativc
stnicuont a: the "Social Class. Dingnoui- ind Trontuant
in Thruu Paychittric Hanpitalt ta tho incriesn Sociolozianl Sacicty in Augnat. rho dutu bl! bath intlysod
according ta hypothcucn undtr otudy in tho in-pationt
sorvico at Hillido Hospital in 1957 and 1958. An
abutrnct or this initial roport in enclosed for your
Honninger Hoapital,
It
Cbntur and Hilllidu

internatian.

urn plonuod ta credit the cooparatinu of tho
ill thrto institution: in enabling this utndy
to bo incomplilhud. I: that. it :ny additional connunicntion
W.

atattu or
noogatngy
new
as

for thc prancntntiou or this data,

Du; Robbins

and hipyy

ycar.

Join: us in withing you

a

Sine-roly yourc,
Enel.

HFsJB

m iInE H05.

would you

lot

anccoasrul

�Social Class, Diagnosis and Treatment

Jar/a
‘

in Three Psychiatric
Heepitals
9s
[4 N
p as,
"Axum If “lips: his
62%;};

s

.

d/mAM ,/

I

INTRODUCTION:

as

g

fag / AL»; 4 Kata, Xvi/5k.
we

,4

A

.

_,

Recent studies have

.1

/

”wk

indicated/a'relationshiﬁ between

social class l and psychiatric diagnosis

MW“'

treatment.I\

and

The

designed to study whether social class
aunt
for hOSpitalized patients was related to diagnosis, A type

present study

was

oi—taeotment and length of treatment, in three

institutions

Withhdiffering social class membership,e£_:h¢_9a;§en¢_.
popaiebfﬁﬁs.
PROCEDURE:
Two

voluntarily admitted patients

hundred and ninety

to the C.F. Menninger Memorial HoSpital, Hillside Hospital

the Massachusetts Mental Health Center were studied as

and

of a given

Patients

hospital census

day in

the Winter, 1958-1959.

research team throughout their

were followed by a

course of hOSpitalization and details concerning their
background, treatment and diagnosis were recorded.
71.9.3th

)7

5/2,

”mg

r [£1
44M”
‘2

I

(’-

’3

1,1,4";

at. &amp;

“4.4140,,51‘:
,

2:3;

f.a.Aﬁ/_
1.14931.

3

,

j&gt;gﬂ(‘""4" I)

MM! 14.0741;

5&amp;4:

4‘

I ”my
1:“

2'33;

4»

fall’g’ffrf (4“

{W4

/

"w
a? “3‘

”

.

M

was f.
a a, ,x.
aw Wm,
f‘zl/“ié ”*Muwwt‘
.-'

7

“A,“

I

‘5

’

1,»

.

«min

ad.“

an»

g9 252‘.
.6‘
-

I J,

£354

{V _

an

,

'

.

�-k’

RESULTS:

a

.

Social class

was found

comparisons between

WM

if

”54/

to be‘more significantnin

hospitals than in inter—institution

analysis. Within institutions social class

was

related to length of hospitalization only; class

signiﬁicantly
IV and

V

patients remained in treatment for shorter periods than
1132.?

those in classes

I,\II

hospitals

showed

significant relationships between social

class

diagnosis and treatment as well as length of

and

hospitalization.

The

and

Comparison between

higher the class status of the hospital,

the more likely the patient would be diagnosed as non-

psychotic, would not receive somatic therapy and would be

hospitalized for
hospital

was more

a

longer period.

The

class status of the

important than the individual patient's

class membership in determining these relationships.

M

�Mary

16, 1961.

Dr. Hilton Greenbhtt,
manhunt“ Rental Kuhn Center,
72-76 rammed Road,

Bolton, Hen.
Dear

mm

It In good talking to you in Wuhington. I think the
meetings went very well and I eapociauy liked Shep Roma's
raport

location

the

VA,

pnuont-paumt intonation.

on

also quite
an
Xurlmd and

is little

The

many nit-moon
in
studios. more

ammo

good. bringing out the
drug

Comm oomtin
and for phoebo control! now in

and comparative efficacy tasks

on

saluting
be

who’s Mom

to

Encloud in our inltial abstract much
to the Andean Sociological Society.

we

My

best. regards.

Sincerely you”,

an: inn: mﬁ.

Baal.

HF: JB

new drugs

in order.

am sending

-

�1.

3...

W
.‘

M753
.

2,3,8.

z

m»

5;.

in.

5.

7

8
7.

4/44:
m7
IAA/c

M, m
M4
n

n

""

If?

’é

a

,

fl.

"0
5
.

.__n

22...}

.JL

A

~

MI

Ag~nhﬁ

‘

13.

m.

In"
M ta man
mum
at

“4.”. I. mmm ms
WW!!!”

m...“

“,.".“.

-WA

�at»

mamount:
”a“ m
I!

1:

'u‘n‘m

5. 19:19
6. 19-”
300

,_

15.

N»?!

0M!

3.

5.a

{@099

Ya

1'0‘1!’

#.

’1

a.
16.

u km

6!

..

‘

”-1”

Rod”
'9‘.

h tumum

Q‘tumﬂ
sans.
ems
:1.
1
’1

an.

3m. 5

"m
m it ms mmum mm
ii

s

g.

11,13.

316/”);
I

“a M‘. “O

“1mm
a
A6311!
as.

1’.”.

ruemnn manna“
rm:is!
”I M‘
m.
I. 13mm:

mun

9i!

mm WPHHJMW

amruu‘wﬁ

O

9. Q

'0.

no

‘.

turns-nun

4.

._.

..
A

.‘..‘L_'A___...L.HA

L.“

A

Mo-A_#*;W¥L~_JIAAL

�4-

mm
III:

mm mm It men,
mum.
34

“I
5:;

I

I

93.

I

,

\

III.
l'“!’
13ﬁt3 "II
“‘4.

I: II IIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII It IIIIIIIII
I. IIII IIIIIIII: IIIIIIIII
IIPW II IIIIIIII'IIIII
J. IIIIIIIII
5*

\

IIIIIIII

'3.

IIIIIIIII IIIIIISIIII
IIIIIIIII II
II IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
-I. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII
3. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII
II IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I.
IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII III.
I. II IIIIIIIIIII
I'lﬂtﬁﬂllfiﬁtlilll If IIIIIIIIIRD
Biliﬂﬂliﬁt
'

~

IS.

IIII II. II IIIII

1I‘mh
II IIIIIIIIIII
3.
I

,.
6.
1.

I.

II

IIII
II
I,
39
,.

.

a;

m

dz..u.__._4-_‘_#_l

“1*
I4..&lt;_;&lt;A’....._._A

IIIIIIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIII
II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
II. II IIIII III
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, IIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, II IIIII
IIIII IIIIIIIIII, I II
IIrIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
:gzuIIIIIIIl IIIIIIIIII

W“

.._..__‘__‘_._..__

A

7

-

.4,

_.

.4...

A

_

l. IIUIIIIIII1IIIIII

A

.__A

meMLJnmIAuig.

"u

�.5.

III: II. II IIIII *1“
,5
IIIIMum-m
I
III; ,
3‘ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII €£II1J¢I.)
k4 VIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
I.
6. 6IIIIII_IIIII IIIIIIII. IIIIII.
,‘I I”; am
a. II «umauguuu
!I!
IIII III. II
:1.3%!“
3. IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. PIIIII IIIIIIII
I. IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII
I. Dita:
I.
I. II IIWIIIIIIIIII

w

’m“

xi”

fiéﬂ/M/k

h“.

“OILIIW'S'
IIIIIIIIIII
ammo 1.I.3. PIIIIIIIIII‘IIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII

W
W

16.

I. IIIIIII 6liﬂ’ﬁil IIIIIIIII
Q‘hﬂ

III. II IIIII “6’
IIIIII IIIIIIII
IIIII
II. IIIII IIIIIIIIII: IIIIIIII
I IIIII IIIIIIII It IIIIIIIII
:.
lilﬂﬂﬁ‘rlﬁl‘ﬁli It IIIIIIIIIII
‘.
I.
IISIIIIIII IIIIIIII II III. IIII
’I
II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I. ”If
IIII III. II IIIII ‘6'
I. II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IugtIgillz.‘:IIIIII
m
III
3Iml
1 I I /
I.
VIII

1.

'

m

I
1»

.

5151*"

33%;
MI

3*

3'

i'
..

:

I.

‘:

‘..

.

,‘

&gt;

_,: \_

‘

k

A.

J
...

.‘A.

Kuwr

S‘

.
A

Jam-.1

I‘m-Hana;

�4"

man“: Fer-Chm:

#7.

M

“in

3..1.

mu
ﬁrm My

aa. aw‘33”:
h «mm
Q

J

m

W

i
1

I

-

MW‘
:1

Mill‘

W‘“;:J”*”'
4"
N
m3w
x95?

W
a ..

W

a.

a..

s.

g.

;

’

..

la

1

,1”

77W

3

a

9’

t

1

t.

595'?

,‘é/W

.

3

«r

‘

3

”:3“ m

.

ﬂ/M/L

13% :

£5

OI.

V

man nasuumm
.. h 5 mm
6 min
7. ’41 mm:
mu:
9% 13‘ mm

1.33893

1

at

,.

:,

=

18;. 151

'

-

1

.
a

‘

m.
so

31,,

1

a. St Mutation
1'" sea:
*‘N 3
ea. I. intonation

.Mm

IW
TM

ill/M
a

'

'

LEW.

'
:~

1
44

�W
ﬁﬁﬁB

6913:;
1.

r 1953,
1. 1:1 Iﬂtyltll'5%lé195?.
2. Billaidt stuay,
1966.

Its:

138.

3333?

_

xearltAL
'2. Kenninzur

3. East. ﬁcatanIQA1th
S. 3:113:53, 195?
6‘ niilsidc, 1969

2,3’hc

£121!!! lﬁﬁiﬁl

5.

831

6,1.

an:

8.

axe:

iii:

1.

2. Ytntle
Extst 3:.

~~.

It

99.
15

infatuatiau

Wits

E. xogrc

am:
a. San: or
3.

9.

10.

nu

iaiaruatioa

nxaxaxan

1. yrotOtttnt

2. Gathcli¢
3* 3‘?in
6. I: or an iatnratttou
ﬁtaltth atagaa
1. single
2. ﬁsrrzcd
3 3 .F”‘§Qd
h. Biraretd
5. ﬁiéavcd
4b

a. la iatirnntzan

11,12.

naaatrzes
-~. Years at aduottita
seas tar colylattd years
-~.99. lo internatian

13.

rnacx a! 31323

1.

331

2. Farciga Barn: Englinh spanking
Sanatrics&amp;
*
: Gorxanie Scandina
3.
avian
.‘ i
ho
I Irina: &amp; Spain
5.
‘
: alnvie ﬂattens
.
t Lﬁtiﬁ ﬁltriaﬂ
7.

5.

a.

'
''
''

“

-

it“,

-

'“

x

stag:
In

infatuation

�«2..

13‘33 1! 3.3.A.

1h.

1. Iativo bars
2. L11: thtn 1
3: 1‘3

h.
3.
6*
7.
9.

I.ﬂ.

15.

1.

5*?
16~19

”“29
36*
Is iatnrutticn

a: 1:3:

69

2. 79.15
3- ag’e9

ha 9a~99

5. 1a0~1a9

?. 129-129
at I39“139
9. aha¢

e..la
16.

informatiaa

Pirillfiﬁ

1. 613:.

.

2. Glass
3. 611::

$661££ gangs
1
2

3

’. Gina: h
5. Glass 5

e.
17,15.
19,2ﬁ.

.

£93

ﬁﬁknoua

I? r123: vstaxxtraxc carrier

~«. Sxact

:3.

30. Re infatuation
gas-tr 112s! rsxcnzsrxxc nesrxrnzxzxrzex

ea. In infatnntian
$1.

333383

1.01

6! P3103 £G$F1t1313511915

z
3

k
6! 5
6
7

a 1».

nolinturnxtian

�’3.”
221

fail}

9? FﬁIﬁi

FIRIQF

Ian:

195F121§ EIP£IIBICEB

1.11 1113 1 unath
2‘5 “84»
6~11

Ina.

“5.
I...»
213-335 ”in
35‘h?

1%“1?

18*33

”it
h. :aars
in intsrnttiun
23.

66331118! 12 31363533;

2h.

61363116! 63 £32133ISIEB ”11536613
?arch¢r1s: ﬁch11uphranza rotatiaa

1. link Ilprct'd) larkadar 3:1.3 Inoammnd
3. Ingratud; ﬁbéqrxtozy lag.) Slightly it
ﬁnahaagia
t11ghtl: svrco; Shiny.
h. 311.1111 tr
6. to intarnltioa
Pcyahasiu: tituct1vu rigstions
nguhsaiu: #151111
Psyuhcauuru$1c.31uar¢ur

?arﬁuntlity nitgriur

7,?raaziiu1
attugt1satl retaintlity 31:.
‘Ho 1n£§rintiyn
25.

saacaasszrzsnztars at 1321311353»
311636315:
Etta 691 2% 101:1 81:
1. ﬁtlplt
Ebhsphrouie
.ﬁatatanic
7

Purlnoid

Lent: unéifftrsntiﬁtcé
Ghranic ind1££utentittcd
7

S¢hise~a££ectivo
childhaad

9th.:

ﬁn

ﬁabelaasifiaatica

60.
thnKtnia

.

2h

atﬂad

'2’

dsprataivt, Innis

3:11: daprcaa1vc, dtprcstiru
£3311 dnprcia1vu, athtr
Paychatic depraaaivt rttetion
- Intaias1aaul dﬁﬁf'tliV'
911::

subalass1tieatina
I

no

�aﬁt‘zh Gﬁdla *3.

disardtra
4nata'brtin
4560““?

(niltpgy)
(and.
:«ﬂanmwhﬂu
an}

Ew’lr.‘

_

.

'Vntaaltr
truagntig
erratic Evil: diacratr. ﬁﬂ‘t‘tb
93$, MIMI?
lo subalnulit1e3$1aa
301*

:3

ﬁﬁdﬂd “h“

Antag$y roamtiﬂa
EausqalatiVH rnuutioa

raunttna
absaauivn aﬁuvultivc r‘natiaa

,

ﬁnmvarczan

Pttii¢ ratatiun

ntprasaivi rauatﬁﬁa

attsr
tubcllﬂltticttiin

,

no

.

$01. 2k ﬁﬁﬁﬂd *5!

Peruaanlity ptttcrn diutarbnuao
Purnoutlaty trait dﬁtturhtaao

,

.

.

ﬁﬁaigpnthln ﬁcraanality dintnrhuncu
ﬁpOGttl ayxmtnu

ﬁthur

reuetttns
'

no nubazganixientiﬁa

6.1;

,

ah ﬁﬂdﬁd ”6*

strata rutctiqu
arts:
Aduiﬁ uttutﬁitngl runotign
xdjnstnant ratctitu a: «hilahtad
Aﬁauatnunt rauctaan a: tillllﬁinni
¢djuataaut rnaattan a: Int. 11:.
.

athur

It

stb¢1¢saitt¢ati¢n

whgn 601. 2h
531*

ﬁﬁu

«04:4

'6’

in Inhalgtnzt&amp;eatinn

txaarnaxxs

numeral

Payahsthlxtyy

2; new; Inﬁtklna
3 Q ﬁrms.
1*!
3

3
6‘ 9 9 3
2?: 1 o 2 4 3
3* iﬁac
I;

3w

Q

{

no in£arua£$au

�17¢

g,

*

1.

m Ptﬂi’hﬁ‘thlmy

runaway“

1. {ayahithtripyw
3; rmyuhathnmapya
h. axon, ﬁhtrﬂyy

£13.
9111:

S. ﬁn¢p¢¢1£1Id
6‘ a. ptyuhothurnpy

a.

1310:3111”
11:1!uﬁﬂtu arxnnia
lid

1. Phanuthyustucm (er, Frintlini,
13:911111,

:24.

1:11 )

layman, «purl, «numb

thnruatut,

mm.

ovzaain tttitnnut
it 1a£arntt1an

ya
11 $0

13.

133623 0? 198111111311133
133311 9111116 21312K131
.1»

81
3a

&amp;0

Wt
11:: ﬂhﬂn 1 ltﬂk
1“ a!“
1‘2 Hﬁﬁﬁ;i
naathI
1
‘
?*8

5» 311

6. Sub
7c

5: 9*10

9. 11

64
291

HQ

3

truths

4

iniawnntltn

1331? ew-avnnxuz 80511211111116!

1. tan than

2‘”
‘t

13st
nanth:
7~8

*1
3 I 22222

E. 6

30 day:

101111

7: 9111 noaﬁha

89.

a.
39,31.

12

again;

£1

zurnruntitn

13¢~u¢atha

12* $3613

11. a
90‘ I

littiyiﬂﬂfﬁ
1R£Vvuattoa

It

�33.:
'

aaazxs Aa:aamuxir
1* Ilwruvné
3. unimprtvnd

a. ﬁt tutmrunttun
33.

ﬁltﬂtﬁﬁln swinging:
1»

Maw“!

e¢

In iﬁtﬁrlﬁtiﬁm

2. Eutnpravod

3h.

axlanama.

Guaylatn rauiauiwn
Ingrtvaa
t.3. ﬁnahnatad
{1: watt.)

1»

a. a. inttrantiiu
35.

xvgxuarxax «an!
1» ahsaktd {vat}
3:. ﬁnish-”kw (at)

36.

axnavnszmnans #3 nxaaxanan
lmrrrcltnunﬁ eunmlntgd

2. any

hatpitil

Plrahuthﬁrtpy hat:
k. l¢tpttgllnat&amp;aa alauuhtwo
5g‘?‘1§hﬂ§§ﬂﬂﬁﬁ¥ alacwhtra
6. In infatuatiin
3w

,

7!! anti. unutui inaath avatar ark!
32-

1..ﬁ§‘rt ﬁts;

a. ﬂat Frnaﬁiﬁ

Gnu:

���~3—

_

gum-qwmmcummmumﬁapmmmmmmor
gm Wham“ Mm u an... and; WW6 W_M
Milan.

1:.

m palm-d mt, ta! mid; tutliﬁuowm mutton m

Iuwummmmuanng-motmmm
wwwzmummmmw

m‘La-u.

Iﬁm’W.M%
wommummmgmmmwmmkdwmammwu

mm» mxm,

W

pmmmwm.

m a»

mum mmum

M

pmmmwmmwmmmmwmmm

mmmtmmmmmwmmmmmmumamwu

mmmumm.lm.tWWuu-W,MW
umzemmmmmim. tummmmn-Wmimm
mmmmmmmtm). m,mmmmmmw

mmmmmnpmmmmmmmm

Wmmm Wmmtwmadﬂtmmtmm
ammm,mammmgmmwmwwm.
mummmpmenmmhm,mmmmumm,

gmmmmmsmmxmaw.wumm mama

w

���r——————,——————
*6.
&gt;

‘mmnumwmwmmmu‘mmorm
_

discipline

..

mm mm, W, Mimi

“what...

$06131

mm m
5,"

.

'pmhnmwytamWQrmtupmmtmmvmWW
V

mmmmwmwmmmmwamM.

W’
&gt;

'

I

mwummmmmm 1&amp;1!th

thmmmmioWMMmtmmmmm

wmmumpmm. memumwimwsmmt
'Wamgnemmmmmmmwuwwmnwtmm

W1. .Iu'Mpm-mtowgmmwmmtmmmdm
mm W. £11»an «W Minimum: mun
«mgmmummumm. mxmmmmm
“thaw“.ammtbancgmmmetmb-‘mmu
mmmMmum. rammimupum‘mmmnnm.a

mthmmm-w

»:

Wmmtmm.

�ummmww,mmamwmmtmamm
mmwwmmmwm.muw
“Murmnmmrmnnwmxﬁmmmm
i

mammuumnmmm.mmwmw.
mum-hammﬂmmmu wmsmmum ml:

mm‘nmmuwhu‘mmrm www.mm

mmmmmmmamewmmmgmu“
M1311

������“Wmmmmmmmmwmw

mum (m

W
m

171.

mu, mm).

“mum.mummummmuummnm
somtmmwmwmmmm,mmmmmu
‘

V
I

(man).

thmmm:mmmmmmmumrm

“mgum'ammmammmuwmrm,mmmmu

“Ww‘WMqumuummrmm (1mm).
mammanmna-mwnummm gws.
mm
W. mm WM
mm
1%?”

with-high

1’

M

in tum-1w?

mummmnmummwthmsmmmwnmrm
mu.

�m... .an—

-w—-——.—.»w.««p—

.muq“.

w.“

ﬁt,murmur

. ,._......,,_

w“,

,_.‘,..._W

gm 52.1%!

w‘

DINm BIAMIS

Wm Pmuy

WHIGAI‘IOR

mm

1. Ema-Mum mutton

Pmmmoaia

2.

Medina Pmmﬂity

Parchment.

3.

Mathias

Pennant: Trait Bitten-blues

Pmonanty

h. Naminittiu Pmmlity

ammo
When“
Inﬂam-

Pwmlity

5.

6.

Putin Ingram“

Mmliw
WWII

aociopathia

1’»:th
nwholiu

Soaiopathic Pertaining
Disturbance

Maul. Pawn-.111:

Sehisophk-ouie

Behiwphnnio inaction

Somsmuctiw

Typo

thoni-

�mm"

n‘w—w—w‘

m— Irwmww-

"~-

mn-

Wamm
”Wm

�w,

._w._.....-—»—.——7

“my“. .

*w‘Iw—wm—

..w..,,,.-mm~—v

m
‘

‘

'
'

m

x

5?“:th

n

1y:

I?

~87

$1

17

1.

1‘33-

20

3k

3k

5’

12

23

29

28

w
rm

m

8.1m

x

'

.

m

=

9

L,

.

MM?”

W7M

;

i

.

“(wa

’

v:

“:7:

‘

�———..——-...

rum

m
ﬂ
19
§

33

19

ps

:5

11*

-

.

M
5-9

22
23

53

33

�warm-c- ,. “mm, .‘VJW

100

w—m..-.v.q—.. m...

2,,

173‘

17
119

10

.~ .

‘

my;

�1463

�"mm mm”.

W--—»;

'7

,

,-.n.wv—.v--u-— mm...“mp-w

.m ......—

'“uvt 74v

'Mv-m-“'F‘.--'-

-

«sow—n” u:

mumm-

173
89

2h

68

v.krw' ﬂaw-n.

—,..., :

_—.

——wr

"erv‘va—u“ w.»

�,cw—wm._

100
173
95

67

2?

-

“win-l1

mm,—

11*!

w. y»...

,V.

"an.“

W 'W‘

‘

1‘

.

�“Irv-CV

gm
85

29

-TW

�mm

1..

him. mm... In:

3am:

03ml.

hunk,

913.13.

Plum.

amt'

m m,

In:

”.13.

8111.“.
mam-y,
Mama
61.“
‘01.,
'0’.
MI,
Wt”,
tit-2099.
by
tho
grunt
at
hum-1
mu
pm
uh»,
or
mm
3.3.
m1.»
rune
mm.
5mm
2: m tum ems: than), mu W.
the emu-um o: a. “I“: o: u-aha-«hunt. mum
an.
out.
data:
in!“
Burnt).
m
mam
1: mm: «momma.
Buumnt a: yacht-My ' ﬂoatation
“an.“
”an“
manual,
an.
111‘

1m.

m.
7/26/61

or upon ”a“.

W

�value“

«an» a: ‘m‘y

popﬁlnﬁicnt 33v. establishnd
rhotovu oouaorntat

in.

and“

Mann. ”graham.

9.01:1
tin import-no. or

type and tncidnncu ot-Iontnz d1a~

order and ﬁn. ctlta$1on a: troltaont; ﬂoat notabln,ot

thin! 1th$t$¢$$10nl has hit! that
Vltdllch

(

) who stndaad

duﬁgnntrn‘od n

it.

3:!

it

801113338036 and

Karen pcgglation uaa

rclntltashlp bctunsn 1:61;: 31:33 can

such puyuhtutrte aspect:

a. tap. a! iroatnun‘ Ind

Stu: thaw ttﬂid £baﬁ 1:!!! 01:0. pitiolta

Ir.

61l3n0I18c

nor. lituly

to in «13:30:96 as satisophvunia and rooctv. 0:23:19 or
custodial trua‘nnnt than

ti... fro: higher 300131 ltvolu.

flynhothcrayy, particularlynnnrehounalytil. In: restric‘od

to ‘ho uppor clasuos.
#341. $ho bactc-tlpovtnnca

aria-at, turthtr tuttlttlt$too1
taut th:

omp11¢1%

at

such studio.

nro 3.3.33.9: to

1'
actor.

{Intern or pruco§a¢a¢that undovlio 5:383

rolnﬁloa:h:ys. an. Inch tent: in; institntod at

81113115"

�.3;-

”“1113”?- Mummmmd.um.u

mtmnuanmzmmuuumuum
out mum-u: «mun sum

as the

nun-v.

Mlmnmnmtmwuwumt
tutu“... MIMI. m “Milt“.

A.

3111.“.

it.

mwmmmmmmmu
umumu.nmmawmuwum.

hmtﬁvaWQwII-aumunuam

umwnwoCmumummo-a
chum.

«mmnmmmummmm

WWW. hmﬁum.mun.
«I «a “no at tun m twat-u: manual
.0

m

01’

Whit» mm

04'

mum“...

onwmummuumumu(

).

am. In" your” «and; Wynn-u m

mtmlyumctn‘mmw:wmmnm

�«’4.

mummwamtmmum.mnmu

anwumouno,mmum

mammm5umumumm

WMWMMM. nmwuumm

m, ”mm,

nun-bun mu- m» m can

thammuuu.amuu
wum.'mums'm01m«1

W
"WWW.

”.mmmummumu
mmummuwhmm;
Mom

CM“

iv

mm

$3.1

tho

”in"!

u'mummmrsunr

a
am

nu

a

W
mt

it I!!!“

a:

1:qu

than

In!

h
01'

It“
mun

Mm.“

man.

”at“: It. m‘mt

awmuum‘uuumwu.m
ﬂu

m mm m mm Mm; m human-u

��.y.

nmmwuummum‘m
“manna-yum. taxman-0W

unmtﬁvaw.udmiwkumduh

W

M O“ tﬂﬁhﬁm, m 0.1. ﬂow-SI”! luau!
In“). In!“ MW
loath]. M “I

W).

W
man.
M

swam m than Mu.

mm.-

m
”mmmm’h
Walk-mm
W:
m
«up

a

man-um 0:

mm m“

”In.
mmmmtm.

”out gunman or m

he muhm

“1.. I)

M

be!”

«a

m as» not Input u

1)

I «am

WM, Wain

.m3)muumammamuumu
vm 1mm in
an
mum. am mm mm

um.muauuwmuunnw.

�do

m
wmm‘mumtw.
m Mu mu.
Mt.
W
mum m. “unﬁt
"I
”In“!
no

1)

«mm mm

m hospital ma
m

mus-nun

a

a

mm“.

W

"at.

nth

of

t" mmmmawmmmwm.
m Wm'l um a militant Mun mutuIum ti. an“ ”my; ummuuumx Mum.
1!)

muumMmmu-aumzmus.u

m ‘19:“. mm on» own-tun a: an "a.“
um
W'm
can
mm m
mu...
and}...
in“:
luau.
nun“,
mm
Ill" amt-.mmmwugammvum
can” (0» m1. 112).

um

m

m

�d}.

m

”inﬁll“ hWhMMQﬂIM”

auumuhulmlﬁlmum.
“luth' luau!- I“ ”1w ”mu
mm.

W
almamllmnihﬂOa‘mmW‘m
and

”alum.
m
“I
mum WW
mm
tun-it.
mind“
m
M. ”an“ m
M. M
1»

mutt“ mum
too 1»

1'!)

in!!!“

”with!“
mm

mum

on

human-do

a:

If

mm

1"

93

min

a‘.

nxum Ronni.

manna
at m
at
on

m «comm an.

ammum,wmuuumu

means mm. 1mm ”assignment.
ma
dun-a1 min“... «4
of

W“
Wu
mum. MWW“W¢M,M
).
and
“1111’“ um m m
(

�W
m
an
m
mm
run

0W.

at“:
m

In“ a ﬂu

In
”on
“up“.
“in
“Wu-m
In
:“can an

mum-M Minn” III

a. «tuna «a "mum at

3mm.
m «a. I: w «amt. a: smut. mm. In
«cum-rid «aw c: pram- macaw rub a.
0!
mu“ mp1»: um. “my. “a.
meow
a.

m
min am in. a “mum: mm.
dmuuﬂuu m ”-qu

may...
th‘

m

on

a

«to not min a m

dawn“: “www.muo mm.

mum-mumsmm»u
Hu I: am ”an“ m locum ”Win.

m
m

thou-unl-

mkmutummnnmghﬁmm

a»

�~9-

mmuamammuummwm
”mmuuzummwmnamm.

W
“mus-amaammnww.
mum

A‘

«at:

WW

II! a

dam.“

W

am
pan-Is
m
m
at»
WW»
80!. mm “amp-unam-

“mm

mt
Wmamummmuum
“It
m

mm“ a» mum wt mun
Winn-m you.“ m. u nmm Ilium
(Ind)

WW

d”

mm
mm.
muuuumuunmtnmuwnmm

km.

MiG-at

In! 1‘

aw Wmummmm. um.

“.muwmuuuuuuwmm
an mun.

nmm.umt.m

mummaumummmmu
mm:
m1.
3min.
mm.
We“ mm.

�1-10-

W“.
mmrumkmmummmam

at
amino
run“
an
m:

wrkﬂw and

awummrmuummmnmumu

m
mum
inn

m mun-0 mm a

,Wn

I! “who It in

tantrum).

at

”I.“

wt
item.

mus

in ma.

mt
m mm:

nu ﬂu

it“ ﬂit.
than

am“ a rm

aw muum “In: in: its mum at ﬁll mum.
on
sum aha-Mum an w mm a:
m macaw m as him than an
um

W
W

sauna“ 8“ man to mm;
Wm an;
QM

um

in a»
aim, than mu
a m manna
at 30W huh-1 m u“ &lt;1”on «a
s «an,» gnu-amm- mm. mm.

In our

Why

Wu
"mu

m. MW

w.» mm

m

�«‘11-»

u

inn-1m

an
was.

WM.

mm

mm

mm m

MI. 1 “mm“. 0M1 mm
m that but than um mm “mm in” m

M

«harm Win W M ““hMg
or
m
mast-3.:
as ”mm;
mu diam”.
«mammain

Mh I
1‘:.,u.z...c.4.,1;8

ems.»

”In.

“um: um W‘. n It“
bid
we
mﬁ
01M!“
mm, Mm mm
n:

_m¢. 1:

WIthan

min-um a: must. manna.

A:

Ch

ambit.

a ml- :1. m Mum. mm a

WWW»: mmnuuamu

W!
WW
W. mmmmmsmarammnu

mum. in

nasal,

and

�nun

mmtuouummmmmumumu

wmmwmum.wmm.

Intactumummmuumuﬁum
“0 ”ﬁlm "an. ”31%“.
OI’

at
W
In"
«an
mung

m

mutant. (mu

“mm-nuns“), tmﬁym
mmuuuummmw.uuunm.um
”muucm1uu.mmnuutu¢Wﬂ.
MmhIhu'. unmmm»m..uuu

m).

OWWMMUM‘WWMﬂmwnw-ﬂ!

ummmnm’umn.

Atm.mmw1w

�«na-

ammglitmmt)m£~uum
"ﬂibmﬂﬂlhlﬂﬁlrwmmm
M5

Mmummmumx

mutual(”to”).
mumummm

ﬂMﬂMWWM“WV-mwmﬁkc

Warm. 'mmmumomom

mautwmmumm

W
mﬁwmmumumumm
mamaammngm

muwmmwmmmmu

hmwmw.mmiuuwmmumm
(mun).

mhzmmnmnmnm

uwmuummummwm.m
mmwawstwmuummm

munmnwmm.

�db-

mmummmu
Immmtmhu). “inhuman
Lma

mm.nwmumwmm

*MW'MW”.NWI§QMII§
manna-hm.

“mun“.anyu

”mmnmﬂaamtm,auuwm

”mutton-an. mama-mama.

mmurmmumm
”.msemhv.
mmeuI-auu

«mmmmumum
magma-autumn. um.m

mwmmuwmwrsm.

mmmwummmaamm

�.15.

mum.

m.

Mam-I &amp; mi. that

mmumm:mmu
MmumuHM-mumumu'

mm

m m an“ «nanny

Wuﬁm-ﬂmmmf
mums-Wwamnmt
'mmmmmwmum

).

mumummmw

.mmmatmsmmw.

”Mummmwnw
mmnvudnammmuunamu

stoma-mum. ttﬁimﬂﬂtw

W" «W
.

=

'*

a
umwmm
~

WWW. ”QWthwm

�mwmwuum.mummm:

”mummwpnmm

nmumnmmmwmumm
mummmummmtm
:mumwtammnwmm
uwumm.uummmram

“Mm‘mquanuw

Mfmﬁmw‘.mlmtmhhﬂm
“RMCMJAMJAW.
Mime
mmm.~

nmmummmumim.wmu

�Q1,”

“Initial “It I rim with a um I «an an
m»muuyumwmum. MG

puinh‘MIom.umm-vvw.u

but niobium" mmwumm'n

mauwammmm.

«mam

m.uamuunlml tum. Sen-nub.”

W

W's.
Wmmnmmmmuum
but 1m» to WI.“

at

unmtummmuuuuummum
mum {Mk II). at “Imam

w

an“

m.mm.uuwwmtumum

mumuuuummmmtunmw
m.munmmuuanmmmum

ammuwswmtumuw.
“swam“,mmmmnmrmn
m

�.48..

m.

W

aux.

WM“ mmwmumm

d ”Hm“...
mm «at manna-u m m m:
m: and: “um u
a mus-nun»
mm
In a. Wt
yam
Md. timzmmm.mum
with“ mm mm

”W

W

m

m

W

W. W,
mmlwmmnmﬂ “4“an
Inﬂux rating!

m um-

A.
In
an
.mm
n
10.3,“
lacuna-u
«- am an

hr :2 mm a m n tho
a minus" m

pm

W:

mum“:
u
w.
m

tin-m

am

in ”mm a: mum“... or
.1- am. in sum xx. in
mm“
a
”new
Wu
mm um.“
m. m, catamaran.
and
a!
minimal Win: mm, main:
Mini. m1. W m «um um: Mm:

um

�A:-

WWNnMWWth
mutmnmmw.m‘m
mamuamuunmwm.
w-

nmuummmnwwtmm

mimmWﬂhﬂth.ﬂﬁ
mommuwrmnmm‘mawhu
“wumnuumm. Mﬂkﬂiimm
mum-hm. stWWMﬂIIlnﬂut

nuutmIMMathkkh¢Wu
u Wat-I” w 'mw mm“. m: an
mmrmatmumhunumm

amn$mu
Wu'mm’.
Minivan. “Mnmmﬁarmdm.

�om

WHMIRM!‘WWWW

uWth-“mmm',
mmnmu'mw'. um.
uws.ﬂmmﬂmmm_muq
H

.l.,“,.Vl

1'5

mm»

stamina-mum
mtaummummmmtuwuum

n‘wuuammu’w‘. vu‘uw

W.W.nmtw'ummmt

WW“W“M“O”WWamw

asmuuw-amtmumw.

At

mmmammwmww,uas«m
qmmun.mmmtmmumm

www.mmuutmuww.
mummmummmmu

m1“.

Asnmmmmeut-umm

�~21»

cmumuuummmmm.
wwmhmskWIWtW'“
“W'umWa
thm).
mum.uwmmwomuuu

*m

W.

��«so

unmet-mum“. um,umt.

mumsmmmunwum
mmmamw;mw.mm

wammdawmwm.
mwm‘mummm
mmw:mmmm~m

Mummnmmuum.
wan-am
mum
mm
mm
Wt
).
at

2.2

«mtwwc
mum'ap'ﬁhu‘ an mun-attain.

m’WM-m

an:

unﬁt-Wlmdnutumm. Mm‘cmu
mam”.

”mummmm',m.

It. mt

Win; it”.

me

WW

�"35*

mnunm

u Mum mm

mm
«is: :W

M
w
Imam”
m
t
a M
3m:
than
was
Mam u mad: mung: aunt's
manna. MWWmﬂhﬁﬂWFn/nua

m
W
WﬁﬂWbWMﬂl-de
www.momzymmmu
m
Mm

mMW‘fa

a. mu»

MWhhM‘WWan

NuWWW.
MW. “.mguummm
nu

WthuMW-mw.

minim!»

uwwmumtmmmmwm

umwmmhawumw
“WmmumuMMMu

��1.

I.

Wynn mmw

W

mat-tic Personality

awoken“: ”in

rmmmaa

Eta-mu” W5

3mm

8.01m this, Fungal:V
'

Mambm

‘.

m

Saginaw Pursuant:

Far-a:

misty

Madam“ int

mow-

WW

�I:
CW,

15833
and»

itiﬂili 9i ﬁﬁlﬂiﬁﬂisﬁﬁiﬂlﬂiﬂiaﬁi

IZﬁE

ﬂcxrtagiou

�Wrww’

W
”mm

m

_.DEP.' RTMENT

f“

GLEN

0M3:

N. 1-

-

W

w

w— m" F’ .ma,,

-

0!

WEHRLHOSPITAL
HILLS‘DE

a a» -- rm

,

A

fag—«m

V

‘

‘

U

_

"

�DEF'RTMENT OF

'

‘

.jy

[mam-1231.1 Psvcﬂllm
HgLleoE HOSPITAL

.

1'be
,

ﬁg“

-

,_

¥

./'I

/1AW

‘3

I

/

/

ff"? ”'"ZA

1

1

/

.’

I

/

LzlsA/L.
/
/

\

/

I

(

/

,I

s./\_

(

/r"—/lw*&lt;’ ’

i

.—

I!

V

“MM/t
‘

‘

I

,4

g.” x_/,- i“
;/‘_

‘1

I

‘

fA

/

/

j

"j

:J“;¢L.p
(Lx/VL

I

‘

‘

��’

(

.~

4,

�_.%:&amp;: —3

2w

2m_.o%

.

_
m

6‘

3‘5

��r—r-mv—I-

humility but

mum

MW:
Wt:
mm

lemme many

mum

We

33mm

�‘

(a
v

mun
Ramswmmmmmmm
’”

«mmmmm.
311nm

nomad

W
W

mm

W

W

Inward

My W

Waxy Mme.
Slightly

1mm

�”w.” .-,,--a-wvrv~w“7 w—z-‘wv ammwwwvmrmmg~

‘

:memum

�w-mun—um wNW~l www-n-wn

cm

m—WAI'WV-vrwwu

A,.m~mmtrv-mlw-wmvﬂ.wn-memW-¢

"‘xﬁ'rlr¢MrW.m-wywﬂ“~va 4”

..

vn'

(&gt;2

�v

‘nwv—cu. ""v-

'n’“ .

wv— &gt;vIFNIV‘W-ﬂ‘1-My—vlm uwrm.

mW'IUF-ww.i' Ir-vw'I"-¥v‘~1www z;

mm

m—wﬂnmmJ—Fvw’ﬂarxﬂv -uww:vml,m mlx.‘ mW'naM‘s-ﬂreﬁurvv-Iw-‘fwarwmrxlv-Iwumvw

av»-

.,

~rv-

.

��awn-n. "-WYN/E'

; cum—n .1 nu-men—w

- m-v—w

mimmmmv

-..~ w

mnnwm

lg
m.

arr

Wm!

:w

":N..iv-"

.

Wm 'w‘mnw'pmw Wm

at frat-nut

Interinstitutional Differences in

23

aim

Pom-mt

�.mmuw—v m MY

1

“Wu.W, .«nv

.,

r“ ass-rw-mw—w
-

.

W

wmmfn‘w

2?
75

33

100

&lt;20

57

20-39

20
28

79

���n

:v

Vw-“Vu ,v

-_. .y

v

,y.

A“.

”w

—

wwwww~mwwruw :vmimn:

rm:

mrrwmw

Wmmmwwm

mm

.

ﬁrm-row mar—rm“,mwlmrmm‘“

Aw

8mm
.i
xﬂ

62
82

55

35

89

37

29
35

me

-.

37

65

����‘74.?
5634

7r.o

�E

53

65

10.29

3049
i

30

20

80

�79.6

9/

1&amp;7

V?

1

4L

43m

ax?
737

«&lt;97

7;

_

.

?7

I)!

v}.3
fo.o

up
2L

���._

“Nu-u": n- vuw—n-anmwasw“):-.a~—m:wwvwmmwwwmqWn.r:wﬂ-wauwmwmvw-xmv-uwnwnmwuu

‘,

t

i

v

x- 20.

mura-

gown—WW

.n

19

'0

o

11

ﬁg

17

1h

69

28

36

3h

,.

.

11:

71

:u.

ha

60

33

'

20-39

59

.

20-39

5.
'

&lt;20

E

'

20-39

,

5

van-1 ‘w-n— our

man

�wwmmemI

TABLE

Munich

V

XIV

and Duration

of

no

v

.mmtm

am» in awaits].

,rw—mqw

gPu-‘cantz

‘

vamww

Manon
&lt;

W."

12

3

~11

12*

A

23

13

a

87

’

w.~h.‘.w-,

12-15

51

20

22

£5

254

35

8

..

12

21

5h

25

12-15

19

13

33

164‘

9

21

21

w: 12

7h

17

9

may

57

39

h

,

’

“Wm—r

«gV\_..n..w_u_l_...

w.”

_._.._w

MC

16*,

c

���Wm.vwvlp.~ .-

TABIE
1'

.

1'

Score

141'

H

'

30449

33

10-29
30-119

50-70,

m0

10-29

304:9
’0» 0

Nation of

1mm
&lt;

in. Ho

Mimam

ta; Paula
7.11

12+

17

57

V

1“?
0-70

Score and

IV

m
33

‘

26
21

7

5

47h

4f:

1/

1*: Ma?
#3

29
15
33
17

69

6h
77

15

no

38

28

9
31
32

2

5
d4!

4

5!" g 93
US

214

O

h

o

V
4
df

7?
Or
y‘
Y
05

���"

3

.
.

u

r." ~w-wm-aw‘m ' —L~"K'.uuhll a

'V'wlm

m‘wmww.‘

-wmwmm

��M.
+MI
o

I821.

LC]

81.?

K

o

72.7

= 2.

x"

=/.-IO

/:~s

20.9]
22.5
31.0

HH.
55%.

“‘3
$8.6

=4

=5£7

X

P

=

N5

MMHC
ZED

49.4

25.3
22.2.

6!.0

w
=3?
x
/

=/VS

44.7

�������W“!-

Aft-5

p&lt;

.061

N'- wmmm"

‘m'W-mmn“mm rum.

V":I’ﬁwmﬂlﬂhm

1». ::-..

r u'&lt;

����‘18.?

35’]

59,2.
(0.0

.

IA’. ‘2’

O

54,7.

52.7
9’51?

MM (4C.

39%
X’V
5/:

/
1 r.

P ‘

77.0

91.8"

13.5’
39,5-

(47.3

53.8

9,/

.

9.7
7.7

‘

.56
N3
‘

V53

����f

70

2

lé

HEN”

/.. /

{’1’

141.4

'

$29

2

~-

32-

é

.5"

�’&lt;ZZ

_

.

7"
1

I7

'

7

'22

7

HS’

5/

_______2__
.

39

‘

‘

FINN

&lt;7

o

7-—

6

.

__

0

"

3

I

11+
M?! [IQ

5‘

€=N3

5

33

4

7-"

/$‘

‘2.

[If

5'

O

g

I?

a

\\ NS

��W6’m

3

m

mtmGoLﬁ.
REE.
26.

macalo 26.

mam.

mthnnhhmoﬂaimdmtommiw’mo'

Hamnﬂquind,m'mw&amp;m
mu'nm.1,mtmmmwmca1.1.,nc.

lawman
analysis, the «en
Gel.

bum
wmmm.29.
11m col. 29/
will b-

mum-following

1,2,;th
29/6,?3 691.22/3 9.’ cal-dim“ 29/0 1111 m ho m.
5. ma far 29f]...2,3, ,5; 29/63; 29/5,? m and com «:3 an
601. 23 and 601. 26.
aud-u

Inmmamthath.
mum‘s-um.

WW

11:91»th

Bogart-ant at
Lunar Psychiatry,
amino‘nybomm
um,
61m
Oaks, I. I.
nmm. Rommel,
1: than. my difficulties um: um. any“, I my 3:. roach-d a mm.
3—7”, Monica 235.

this

mm,
My“.

to: Dr.

shun}: yum-I.
nth-ma. '3. mp1, mm.

�iua1apuruhoxnclcnt Aspu¢1n or

311.21 L. Kain. rn.n.*,
ﬂhﬁﬁauAul

Ptrtiaitriu trcaﬁnautle

In: rulxauu, r119.

51.5.1, ra.n.

tad
ﬁlm yank,

«a. Buymrtntut a:
r:«. 01¢:

8.3.

Expurmsaneax Purch1a$ry, 3111116.

cult, 1.1., I.!.
AAdnt 11 putt. h; ‘11:! 31.209: at tug Iattsutx Ianiisato
acuith.
and 150 1.3113
Pabltc Buntth

innpitnt.

v.5
8.5115 lonrd.

at 3.11:1

strvincz

”unﬁt!
Unna¢uhurot§n
$113!:
Innis:
the
unaporuﬁitn-ox
if
It:
ti.
Icalth 6.31:: :31 1h. c.r. uonniusar ﬁaaorstl aaapatux 1:
¢9m313

cratnthllr

aukunmloduuﬁ1

; it ’I&amp;

31v1u1on
Srozgatﬁtgdrutts

13

2/63

.

at Ptyuhtntry, nontuttaro ﬂcnpltal,

�In innit liuﬁr or sun luv
pupuxmtttn, Rtlltacthmnd 5a!

83";

ynxuhzutrta patient

ildlilh rtpnrtaa atnatttc£ut

rolntioulhtpo bitumen In innavzdnaz‘a yactt£¢a in tha tuuinl
clams Itrusﬁura 3nd tan yrgv:13aan

at trantnd illausu.

typun

or dilﬁﬁﬁltd aka-rduru Inn kind. and ﬂurutiau a: puruhtntvxt

trvutunut aﬁstuxstgwod

(

).

Char indimutté,

tar txuupla,

tht§l‘hig§ur vruyirttiu «f 1¢§nr alutn puﬁtinto in troutnunt
wart alanattata
yumitnma

at

It

purnhntaa

uppur 91:5:

nae pcvtunnzity

will. attairteuntzr high.»

pmn¢

patiuuit Viv. eluaattioa at nauto‘ic

etuurdtra. Far all vatltnts, psyahqﬁharupy

no: Ippitid 1n dalyriyoriiunutqu htnh itarnqa ta twp.» «Int.

pattua‘a. within «tan

dimgnﬁat&amp;e granﬁ, yqyuhatharnpy was

apylzcd unﬁt-afﬁne in npm§r ulna. yaiicmﬁa tad urinate

ﬁhtrtptnn tn lunar ulna: nuha‘ntn‘ ﬁiaimmr

It.

ligaxr1canuu

at ¢uinanic fantara

at traitius paruannal dgtaralaiag thn

and

availability

abnorvgd disrurauman

tiuld at! ht uxtludaﬁ in $301: Iﬁudiii. to tutu

ﬁho #010

u!

�-2.
ﬂﬁﬂihl

fact!!! in tap $r¢ttuaa£ at hutpttniistd patinuti

nadir noadition: axnluaing sh. ruutara a: p¢ti¢nt'n rtuinata
Ind

availability 0! trcltnuatn,

an: «adtriakta

it

a

yaticnt can‘t: try: aurvay

3111114. unnpitul in 1957*

yitti. t Viritty at triatntut awn...
ind Irzouio thortpiua

at.

1st. at thﬁlr ability

$9 pay.

In

inglndinn pszuhothtrtpy

available to

«11

pgtiautn r.¢nrd~

an abachtd $hut nan. odnaatsﬁn and 913:.

a:¢n£t1u:utly aaluciutod ﬁith ﬁbﬁiﬁ.

Quin hog.

#3

at htrth

tran‘naut, duratiun

a! unﬂatt:11nnii¢a, altnzaul datahlrgc IvalunQiun
daggnunta (

i. 91n¢r, iar'tgnwbara patiantu

tarsal uduaattca

wurn mart

warn

with

ﬁnd {a

lit‘lu

Itkolr tn ruccsv. qu‘tiu thurtpy.

var. kupt in tha hnspital for nhurtar pcrioda at tint,
aura titan rttaa .0 rancvurgd «r

gawk

Saerth

And

an ditchurga.

In nanié;at. tho rsuncar, buttot uduoltud and n.ttvc born
paﬁtonta

airs

at ertsuunt,

stimn raeatvud puy¢hothurtpy an

wot; haapituiisad

it.

001: turn

tar tong.» parioas tad rancivud

�.3.
t3: yearc: cliniuul diauharcu rutinut.
Show: obsorvitivna

attrautypr :culitarnin

3

rarlactoﬁ
ﬁnal.

C

v.3.
1n

£139

raintud to noniurau or

lubjnet': roaponaea to

). Bichar

F

a nadiriad

asorau wart unloointcd

with ditgnaicu at 1nv¢1utianal payahnlis, uhartnr parioda or

hanpitaliuutiun. and»:
tharnpy (

It

).

who

h$shmr

inoiélubc a: roturrul tar nouutia

canclndod

thtt the atroets

patterﬁa
trulﬁmant
at aauiua algal (us dutinud

my

an ysyahiutria

Halliaatho£a

tad analluh). tau, advantiaa birthplncn and dogreo at statue»
ﬁypy

«tru

33%

u

result «I aconontc itcigtl or tvuiluhilitr a:

uuagilttan
an:
«luau.
trnitpsnt

wan

tha$ the oblervntionu

taﬁptutiou.
rtrttcﬁioa at ditturunt naagl a:

8.2.

:

tian

and uxpruntian.

It

conuu31¢5w

u:a poztnlatai that anhsucta cf 108a:

would
ROI.
313th
:ud
uduaattau
1001::
fortian
Ioninl ulucunl,

in
maker
nou~varhu1,
ar
mangory
lynptunu
ninirunt
trcqututly
puttnrnas while uyper 015a: subjunts vauld
of .xprnulion.

utiliip

vurhal :¢nnt

�.3...
A

n¢e§nd

titaa to

ﬂho

intirprttatlon, navthr, rc1:tnd th:
tratinaat philauophicn

tntiauul luadura

and

It wan

anﬁ paraoanal.

lantiiutioau what: ynyuhathhrapr

Wﬁﬁ

absurvuu

;ttitudu¢ at 13:81“
nuggsstod that in

ilxhly vstund, uypcr

Ginsu iudﬁvidunln wauld rauntvu inordinatu ruprtlcnta$$¢n in

ski! ﬁhtrnyy. ﬁanilnrly, dinahara. ovtluntiouu ¢ad duration

at hanyattlxaatioa ﬁtnld

bu

aflostté

195?

«tat:

at dittcring anciul ain‘t.

unpnatntionn for individutln

to twat this

by nitraronaan in

uu¢¢nd aucg¢utiou w. doaiicd

Hillaido Iiﬂdy; to naplvy

¢h¢

to rtpcat uh.

It». lrotudurnig

Ind uon*

¢h§arvati¢na
«ataad
the
to
ta ta: oth¢r iantitntiont,
currently
shn

0.). nannincur Ronarinl Boupttul a:

laaaachaaatta Manta: noalth

Tupakt tad tho

Conﬁar 0: Boston.

In theta thlﬁt

hauptinlu, inlﬁitutiaunl ptraonnvl nfxuot similar ttﬁitadus

in trsatuuut tad education. Eaah

I fall tin:

Inpurwinory

stat:

1a a $¢¢ohins

hasxital with

uni tutivu rtnnureh dapurtneat.

thuy amphaaiaa yaychnnng13t1enXXynarianttd glychntharaﬁy but

�m5.u

yrovide uﬁhor traataantn 1nolud1ng nonttxu ﬁhortpiea «ad

aetivp pragrlnt of utiiuu thurnyy.

Bach

’trosuos chart-

terﬁ traatmant of voluntary watiuuta, data

tedial aura

39%

provide gun»

ta arav their paﬁiont papulntian Ira:

and tend:

aimilur an; graupa, excluding ehtldrun and thy aunilc ug.d.
ﬂﬁjar inatiuuhznual dxtrcronaun 3:! gain in thoir cantata
or iinnnaial anppart, airfarent institutional policies rnnnrd~
Sag

lanath at stay

ﬁnd

ntﬁur¢¢tru. rho Huanuohuanttu Rental

Health neuter (Mﬁﬁc) in a publin

Itﬁﬁt tundu: Killstdc Hospital

institutien suppartud

(RR)

1: a nan~pvot£t veluntary

hospitui with a ns3ar partinn of its incanc durlvnd
and other aonmunity funds; tad Kanningur

pr1v¢ta inntitutiun.

taliuntiﬁn, «5:1.
more

Hﬁ

at

33

tic: nit;

nanpital (HIE) in a

ha; I 90 day limit for haapiw

I flotiblo on. yaar retina;

kaharal attatuda. At urn $nd

@ntpntiunt ulxaia urn

while

Thu Hana

by

maﬁa

trail: trailnhla

t

and HIE,

I

dty hospital and

to all vatznntag

thdrela no 43a heapital and I uhopt tutu, limitld

�45.

tttovenrw proevnu is availabla to
2h: printry ruaaun

I

tun patinnts.

far ouloettng tun tattitutaonu,

havov¢r, lay in thy axpnctutiou thnt thuy vauld murvu pattants

of differing acuinl alumnus {nae £5) lad that differuneui in

this dtutaiicn vauld

bu roxlnatad

ta.

ta

trau$nnnt wurinblaa.

rho speeifiu purpato cﬂ tutu stuﬂy wt: ta dotcraina papilla

t1en dittnrcnaas betuuan tun ﬁbrin mustttnttant with raaptct

to anclnl alman, :39, education and

F

utorc,

na&amp;

to rolutn

thaaa pttiunt chlraatcrtatica to sho trnntnnnt Ouvtnblun of
type at treatmant, durntian or hospi$a111nt1an, diagnonau
diuehawg. twilvatinn.

Qua

�.1.
REEBOB

A11

:

pattoatn in rcaidcnco ia‘th¢un tnaﬁiﬁutiana

givun dutu in January 1959 aura utuétod.

R8

had

mane

on

whiz. urn tan

auuhar
thoaa
a
at
at
duly,
stall
patients
veluntlry

Vtrt sultanua by an: uaurt: ta thu institutioa tor

puynhiutria ovuluutian, or a chranis aahiuophrqula granp
udn1t$¢¢

:nat.

fro.

in...

a

ottto hospitll for a Ip‘oific roaanrah pro-

putisuta wit: oxuludud tron thy viva: bocauuc

at thiir nan~vo1unttry ataxia.
ntltnd a:
350h

putt-nil ﬁt an,

113

patient

wan givun

The

100

study popu1¢tloa cou-

at urn tad

1h. culitnrnSn

P

cauln

95

It

(

nuns.

) on

the

agatgnntaa dtxt. Paticntt' roeovdn aura analyutd ﬁtter a

ported at 15 nontha. which was the out~o££ vaint far the

analyai: a! hut trontm¢nt vnrzuhloa. tor the dntcrninnuiau
of

toaitl clans, tau nailingthuad 2~ta¢tor

inaux

wua uncd (

).

�1. nutheaolegle Aaggata

it ﬁt:

tuna uhlurvod thtﬁ thc vary tautor: an var:

inturcltoa in studying afroatﬁd thi aollcotiou tad organizt~
tin-u o!

tn

dun. Via-tutu” in “iguana“: a:

tarp: of

trantmant and axprausiens auad far dtuguoaia and trottuant
awnluatann, mad: aanlyauu

attriault,

tnﬁ rcguirad ooastdsrublu

sanrtion for unitarnity.
I}

1'-

at

u

ut_!r, taint:

Among

thy tast1§u~

had
a
tha
that
the
dtslgnataon
pattnnt
for
crituria
tionn,

rocuivcd 'gnyahothurtpy' aiztavad narkndly. asking autturuity

in cluas1rieat1nn difficult.

At nrﬁ‘ﬁaychatherapy win dot1g¢

nttad ta trautaunt udn1n1;tar04

atnfr paychsatrtst, tar
additional

i...

on a

which tha

proaariptian basis by a

puttont

was obtreod

tn

acasinnu with tbs psyahittric rwsia-nt wart

cansiﬁarud part at routina adninintrative pati-nt earn. At
an psywhath¢rtpy Vt! dcfiaﬁd

at trcatncnt anatiana with

psychiﬁtria rcaiaﬁnt. 8‘33: puywhiatraat: do not treat

#hn

�.9.
rationia dircotly, but ruatrlntud that! activitius to uup'ru
ﬁtting the reticent th.rnpia$s. At the naac,

1n

centrtat,

paychotherapy Ina designatcd as a function at many diaciyliuua

.

payohiutric rustduuta, nurses, lidl¢§1 atudent¢, 3601.1 uorkorn
3nd

piyuhalag1atu. Formal rueards at sneh nonstona warn ”Gt

ruutﬁnc inaludgd in tun patannt': rauerd and to accurtttn
watch

patiynts were ranazving puynhethorapy,

v1.3 the r-uadcnt in ohnrgo or each

ta intcrw

stat.

Thor: aura individual

b} migﬁuouia:

we hmd

institutional

aestza 18:10:, uhzah and. nonpartaans dirtianlt.

dinu~

At urn

ata¢hnrgo diagnoaaa unployid tn: multiglq clanuificntian

rsynhiﬁtrin
Asaouantian whila both an tad
nyittn.at tho shaving»
nanc rallawad unitary indiganoua nywtims.

at diagno¢ua tron urn
goaﬁad convuruiona

it.

savcrul ax‘mplas

Itutud in tabla , with *3: angu

inté catcgoriaa campartble ta tn. athar tun

inatitutiom, providing,

how/var, an muvoidnbu sound: or

d:stortian.. @iuilnr abaarvuﬁiona hit» bton rapartad
and

hit asaacintas

(

) who

h&amp;v&amp;

by Paanntniak

chain thnt diaganac: within

�411“

saniax aluau unngupition at thi karma institution: (Enhlt

kt urn tho ycyulatioa

artdoninantty‘uppar c1;ln with

wan

par cant of pntiuntn in annaea I at

all»: 7. I»:

«luau xv, and man. in
5% HR

82

i:

uni! can viticut

maﬁa!» «Inna

praauuinttcd

31th acct patients in clnauan XII ind xv (éﬁ par cent}.

At-HHHG,

57

It,

).

pctianta «are «htafir from tha luwur a1u3;aa with

pix eont la olnsans
b) 532:

Rhurc

uué v.

XV

at:

an

ailturnaat in tan inutitatianal

papnlnﬁioan in mg: diatribntxan. a rung: afloat fiﬁh sh»

putiuutn an». undur the :3: at twnnty and on: quarter warn

:orty

yunru

at oldgr.

a} manuatagg:

was

populations éitrared 1n adunnﬁianal

nttainnunt, with patienga at

tiau
gt

ﬁhsn thguc

3x36

it

KFH

having worn yanra

cﬂucau

«use. Whit: k1 gar cunt at tho patiunﬁu

ruilod ta camylcto high auhacl, only

an and 23 ptra¢nt

a:

at

Krﬁ

did

sat graduxta.

32 par aunt

at

aux» Sanding

in.

cauuxntunt with the anciul clan: diffnraugt, claws the ceaiul

�113 8

Intur:uut1tu%1onat countriinu. for aeasnplrahalosiaul
Viritb1¢a

m

512.

2.

51

an

23

3.
h.

17

3h

13

1

3h

29

5.

0

5

28

19%

19

22

1.

anti-1
G1!!!

26

Q

315

7%

”we
3%

.

I

9-.001

‘

59

58

333

22

23

33

23

32

bl

um
m.

2.2.15

51:

51

a9

16 *

23

1?

1o

radorn

to«29

51

33

20

Sowhﬁ

hi

90

38

Sa~7a

&amp;

18

a:

Ag.

a “121 5
d£~8

39.39
he *
4.12
&gt;

12-3.9
d£*h

phn'ﬂ'i

,2,

mi

.1

n~-0§

$g9.2
;~.aox

�.1a.
alas» unnauru 1;, in part, buncﬂ an t6uani&amp;§n.
a)

P

Squat: 91:2.»¢ue¢¢ in tha diatrihution u:

warn ubaurvc&amp;‘

Fixiyuaun put

buluw 30. and chi?

It

In cautraat.

I aaala,
A: ax

tight par

«an%

at urn pntanutu

fifty pi!

want of the

had accrua

watiaatl

9:!"

ma

an“:

a:

50

at mart.

hna ? acorns in the

hwe

in: diaign «I an: study includad
within stab

r supra.

sunk wath snarot mf an ar abuva.

tad rurtyutwo par «ant

"hum:

had

aunc tvauﬁy gar cunt uura halww 30 on tha

31461: runga bntwaaa 30 «ad

tho

r Ewart;

m

nxnuinntion at

m myohutric an» 1.:

inititntiaa, ta wall

as butacun

inatiiutioat.

tutu uiupuriteaa pruvua difficult, in putt buaauuo a! difrtrw
aueid in thy dotinitiun a: ﬁn: paychiatrac variabluu, ﬁnﬁ,

in part, huaauau shins variables ranged so widuxy that

«gnu

paraﬁln answer: arxtﬁria anmlé «at b: autdrniuad. Far
umnmpla,

‘o-conpart tautitutican tn relatimn tu Innath a:

�«13‘-

htlpitnl atty, vuriout eut~¢t£ poriaal any: triod‘but nan:
sllnuut tar

at

165
At
than
luau
«.11
3150:.
urn,
cqulvslout

putiauta audﬁr ho yuan: ringinnd 15.0

thin

7

non‘hi.

At sane, 70! of All

Ind 39$ aura than 12 unathi.

runnintd 1.3: than ? ninth». ﬁnd 63 mar. thtn

patilnti

12 manthn.

Aauarﬂiugly, amphuaxa will bu pluaad on 1h; dirtcrunaul
btawcan

institutiana, with cttatiau

wt rolcvnat intruuinuttw

tatloatl rolntianthiyn.
g)

saw

pnt1«nta

439

at xru

i

m:

“autumn raw

yuanivnd aauutiu thlrnpy than &amp;t tan nthsr

tau insﬁltutaani.
Manning.»

'

Gauaurrintly a twnllor parcuntasu of

patiautc warn attuned a: rac¢ivla¢ payuhothurnyy,

with 3 lawn; aunts: (36 vcr want) r-euivtng niltnu turn. a:

trtntaaut.
an

At

KR

that. antiautt

Hamid

hut: bo:a «Inluitiud

ﬁtting rgenived payahatyarupyﬁ x: can cuntruata tun pita

owning. or

338
aamatac
knurayy,
reoniving
patient:

ahwvu

oxanttieuntly lass than wither at tho ﬁthur tun inatztntiano.

�.11..

niltvu
,

(13 Ethics

yarsittin:

a «catwalk

Wﬁthxu wank

it

and plyﬂhﬂthlvariiﬂ wwrc cauhtuié.

a: aunntlu :né

taltituiion.

trontaant at urn

and F

?ut&amp;unta why unto yuan:

at

pny¢h01¢¢1¢a1 thuruyivn.)

nan wan waistla to nu10¢t£ua

near: as xru

$nd

ER

(Tablo

).

uhnwa F a%oru VI! low rc¢c$v¢d

pnyuhothurnyy with srcutnr trﬂqutaay $han gataouti who Vdra

olétr

or vha haé high F acoraa.

Enua;t1¢nn1 achiavcnoa‘ and

innit} eiaxn ﬁia not nigniticantlr atfcct soltutxan at
’30::

it any

hauyéhnix

Ana»: ﬁhn yuyohtatrxc Ulrimblmt, within naah

aitgnasia

twia%*

wax

inttitut&amp;cn,

higﬁly
tun want
rulatvd varinhlo ta aaltetxon

at itcn%annt.

91l¢hl¥3ﬁ ovuluntiaa

honpltuliuutana at 33

ﬁnd name

it

urn and aur‘tiaa u:

“are :13. rolatcd

ﬂu

saloation

at troatucnﬁ. than, aanataa truntaint an: :ataataﬁ for
pa‘iiuﬁa clataiiicd nu sanitaphrania and attaativa dincrdlr

hart nttna

ﬁhnn

urn;
pafahaaanrntia.
Lt
that. «littnd an

puﬁlunia rccaivtnc

lattiiﬁ arnatntnt

(prudnninaatly that:

�’15.
alaauid an nahisuyhrtntu) rililwﬂﬁ dalnhnrsc rating: at
minus.
pmyuhnﬁhcruny
rn¢a1v1nc
p¢i$¢nsa
than
ngtuprovoé
With

hyapaﬁnlu
acupztuzx:xta¢n,
ptticuta
dtrtﬁiﬁﬂ
tn
a:
rtcnrd

ﬁnnﬁ

tar langcr ptrlldi
b)

wtrn

that: rtcuivtn: nunutie thcrﬁgy.
eoaniwtrnb1u dittortunau

g'

vurﬁ #huwn bﬁtwnan

«a. ﬁbrin inuttﬁatﬁvna with waapaat so

paxatuﬁ‘a lungth a!

stir

3;

(rahlw

31a pasiuaﬁa VI?! han-

ta§a¢wt,
with 65$ 0: puﬁ¢¢atﬂ runniniag
pi‘nxasud
naathn 0r aura, «savanna

tud-unly

5

it

31

9a: aunt

that: ut

gut auu$ a!

H336.

93

it!

tar

twmlvu

the 33 patinaﬁa
aqua} uﬁny

Inuit:

at

thy

while twawthirat

EB

nxuvun
and
batuuua
savtn
ﬁﬁ!
stony

a:

win
within
éiﬂﬁhﬂraﬁﬁ
warn
3836
tan
watasnta

munQKa

a:

heapiﬁaliautiong
urn uaﬂ
ﬁn

I! at.

wan

its

luadh 9t haupi§altﬁtﬁ$¢n

for tha 1nugust veriad. At

sauznl tunttr unit alumni: rtlaadd
~~

yauutcr yatxcuﬁn rmmniutns

Ovary :50

1Ith,

hawavcr,

that:

�.16..

nt

RIB rammiuud

lanai:

£hnn

at

an

at

Indand, an:

mane.

intnriuntihutiaanl diffuranous voru :9 grant that

: putttat

in the oldest as. group an: no». ltkniy to ho bospittlisud

far trait. nanth: or
yuanguat tau stony

mart

at

tt

Hana.

urn thin war. pntinnta in an.
At urn tad an

tier.

wan

tile t

aignificnnt relations batwenn durutiau a! honpitnlisutinn and
F

acara, tho lave: r uaora being atoneit‘od with lanai: in.»

pitil atty.
a) gigggniggu
1: thaw;

t1.

1n

rtblo

2h. diutribntion at diaehurgc attsnotnu
.

tar atatisttecl analysis three diagnaln

ﬁery
undue uabtsophranin, n£rautivv ditardﬁru 3nd
grvnpiugn

psyvh¢nouroaaa Iﬂﬂ ynrsonultty «Quaraorn.

portiona warn similar for the an and
tha

HFK

muse

rho é:ngnoci§a prou

povulnttons, but

pt%1cata warn rngurdoé as having raver urinativa and

Iahiaophrania éiuordcrs, but

I larger haiku:

or paymhanoutotia

or ehnrtatar dixardaro.

Intrttnetxtationul analyntn

chauoa

this at as both as.

�.1?.
and 3

suort ”ﬁr. rwlntnd to diﬁgnoaiu: at 3:3 as. clan: of

tan sonata tgntart In: volataa to dinauouing whiz: at
nuns

a: tha senial variablnu war.

trig

vurinblgs, dingnoaaa can signifia&amp;ntly

so rolntcd.

haupitnl ta unleatioa or trottmcnt

&amp;nd

or

maﬁa

its

rolttcd

payouts-

1%

«.mn

durution at haapittilo

nation; Ina val: at an tn aiaahtrgt ovuluutioa (gag:

£££E£)~

a) 91353:: 0 Evuiuatiunt In sack heapital, nest patiouta

‘fi urtlnttud It
A?

the time a! disnharga as ”ingrovodﬁ (Tabl.

).

338. hatovnr, a higher ptreuatuga (19%) at patisntu warn

ratad g. *uninprav¢d* and only I ainala puticnt wt: callud
'rucovnrod* er “hunk impru§ad'. rho highant porcantago at
*rccovaro¢*

at "Inch impruvod' rutxnga

(28%) and

thy lu‘nt

haunt! at ”unimprovaéﬁ (165) wort $9334 at ”386.
Anulyann within uaoh

it

an and

Mann

thqrt

vitae haiku: than
1117

institution

ﬁne a teuéancy

ahavad vuriuhln

rliﬁltl.

for clan: pationta ta

ywungcr ones, but thc

b0

reunita urn Itntiatiaw

significunt only at an. At a!“ that. run

nu

appositu

trand, vita 014.! putxautt'uara liknly ta b. rutcd unimprovti.

�__._._.._

u—mmmW__—m

��j
w
-

49:25

{0‘70

W

“i

a7

-31

2

5“

”iii—“T-

7

'5

_

��f
".
’qg"

A

comparactu

a:

Parahantwio truntnuut

ta

rant: Ybiuntary ntipstull

nan-t

an.

an,

Plum", nu mums, rum.
lathgaxnl 81‘301. ?h.n.
mu

m:

’bwu

Buapitul.

nu, ma.

Dmrtnoa‘ a:
ta.
#103

6th., L.I.,

znpnrtnnntux Plynhiuiry. laliuido

l.!.

II~2992
thy
Inttunal
Inntt‘utu
grant
a:
by
u.a. rublxu ﬁnnlth survtc.; &amp;ad tho liuuau
mﬁuilth
at Xantul
ﬁuuaiy nuns:1 ﬂutlth 30:96.

a$ntt$ at tho lansnahsnntts luatnx
I:
it.
‘3‘ 0.3. Hummingur ﬁbuuriul ﬂutpiﬁnl 1n

In. comptruiatn

ﬁnalth Busty: an!

gratutully ntkuaulodx¢d.

Aﬁdraau:
rrtltat
3.1. $7. 1.1.

*

'VI:

3/5!

niviuion a: rayuhautnr. Hau‘utinrc Bouptttl.

�tn thoir 331$: at

ﬁhw

It»

ﬁavuu

ptrﬁhtatrau patilnt

ﬂailingahund
and anilinh rapovtla Itgntttnaui
populnilon,

valuisuauhipn baiwaun in xsdaviaumx‘: position in ﬁn.

tilill

$ti§tad
alum: ptruoturc Ina £3. pravuluu¢t at
illnaua.

twycu

of attsuaaud atturamru and kinds and duratica.¢r payahAatrtc

truutnuat :anantuiarad ( ). tkgr thattntna. for umaupla.

that

;

hiahor prupowﬁann a: ions: aliin patient. in tvaatncat

were alnncixtua Il~pl¥¢hﬁ§ﬁi whaln‘uignzrinnutlr

hithi? ptﬁ~

.purttons a: uppar ulna: p;t1¢nth var: alanuaxand an nuuraiio
and

puritanlitr dailrdora. It! all

at:

inpldrmﬁ

is ﬂiuyrnportaau:sity

pnthonﬁu. acyuhutharupy

high

ditrtli with at:

ugyuw ¢1§Is

pnyuhoni
ouch
within
«inunnutat Iran»,
gutiyutaa

thirty?

tduxnzut.r¢d

um.

its;

Otitn ﬁt uppur exist p;t$amtt

tad otntatu thnrupmuu in lunar 01a:- uabacatu.
who

cianiti‘nnst or iﬂiﬂﬁliﬂ tnc‘uvu

at Granting
«avid nah

pavuunnnl dutaruinluc

b. txaludod

1a

and

uvtilabaltiy

it. obntrttd altxaruucau

taunt iﬁudaua. In tact tau rﬁlu a:

�.1.
watts: raster! in tin trontuntt u: hutpitalssd&amp; vutiantc
'udur otndttllai quludtnl tut (natty; at pustanﬁ‘a £1uauuei
and

availability at trttﬁuautly

an! auditinknn

t

pISai.

patlunﬁ acnaun sip: auvvqy

at lillntdu niuptint

1a 1957.

in $38: b0!»

vnriuty a! ﬁrnntucut nudcu, Snalu¢1n¢ ptyﬁhmshuruyr

or;¥nsc
aha
thnrwpiom

irt

a: ﬁhutr ability ta

§u¢u

u

wt dbauruud

availahiu ka

all

patauntu rustedn

why.

that use, Odiatilin

and 911a;

uf‘birth acre

’atgatritaﬁtmy automiftid with «intau «I trtutuon£. duration

at hospitalautttua,

arts:

(

)a

ultu1u¢x ninthnrtu cvnltatiom taa «luau

furnauﬁubnru
nanny.

pattcn‘. with

littlu

Input!

giauttiaa war. at». minim: ta rucuavu taunts: taartpy, viva
taps in

in. hatpattl it»

churﬁar yariod. ﬂ! $aun, and new.

nt‘uu ﬂirt vital in BIDUVIIid

aw

unit tuprtvcd on.d&amp;nuh¢rtc.

In Ionﬁrnta, tau yuuasur, buttur cﬁnuutod and natavm burn
pasiunsa at»:

titan ria¢1th

purchaihurupy :3 tan saxo town

a! trau*uou§. aura h¢3p£i511tvd 1hr teaser piriodi and tuuuivad

�.3.
ﬁhc‘poovur

ciiniail

dinuﬁuran rﬁtingg.

Ehita uthrvnﬁttun turn 31:. ruxattd ﬁo'nauturat a:
tiawnatrvy a: rurllctnd in nubaoais' vacuum... to a uyda~
{10¢ Gnltforuta

I Butt.

(

).

Haghnr 2

gotta: war: aasoaann

tad v1$h ¢$uau0unl at tuvulutttaul psychouta. thawing purtoau

a: htuyitnltl¢tian.

and

I

highnr Lnuidcacu at votnrral 2i!

aquatic thtrnpr ( ). 1t nun nanola¢u§ thnt thu uttuuta a:
aoat‘z class. :31 Udllltilﬂ, biuhpinau and dcaroo at clarcaw
Sway an

purchaatrtc ﬁruuinnat patturuc war. not a rouuit

t:

ataaautn :Iu‘¢ru or awnainbilitw a: trunungut ilﬂnic 9a:
dbﬁurvutiuna
war.
3:3:tnttan val thus thg

iudtviaunl astrircnnnl in
and

«uprtslian.

X‘

month

&amp;

ratlcutiou ax

a: Iiuytutaon.

nununaaaattan

uni pcotulatcd that uwh3.¢tu

t: taunt

cocinl #Iﬁllﬂﬂ, lacinr‘wduuatiaa uaa turuttu birth wtuld
aura trtquuutlr nanatalt lympiduu in nanwvorbul. tanner: a»

II“? yt‘turuu,
nﬁtn:

whtlo upvav alas.

If «upruisitnv

Itbsattl wall uttiiiu varbnl

�“a...

t

aanaud

Lnturpritutiaa, huuuvor. ruluiud in; ubturutw

taunt tn tht ﬁrnnﬁusnﬁ philaaaphiul tad xsfttada; ct talttm
tnsaaunl lucdaml and yawnunnul.

tilt:

audzv1d3313 nudﬂ runnivo

It Uta

aaacaﬁtod

that Ipptr

inardiautn vupr.uwntahi¢n in

psrahnthcrupr in 1a:t&amp;%autoan what. yaymhntharanr vat highly
vuluca. ataxitrly. ﬂiﬁlhtrtﬁ.§VIlﬁiﬁiﬁnﬂ and durailau a:
knapitnlintﬁxan Imuld ha i33cttud
u!pn¢$nt1¢nn tum Sﬂﬂ1VSdn§11
20 tons

195?

allllléi

my

ditturaunh: in Ital!

a: disrurtn; social «la...

that scannd augguutioa an anulaad to ragga: the
ntnay unplmrin: uh.

u&amp;nc

pvuaaﬂuria ind nan»

aurr.nslr t0 «stand it» ohnurvut1¢na to
tun 6.3. naauaugim armorial Hatpataz

at

sun oﬁhur
Ebpaku and

inatttn‘ltuu.
tha

untanahucnttl nausnl Hﬂ‘lﬁh cuntlr a: vastnn. In that. ﬁhrao

haupitnln,

initttutianll piraunuol stitch :intlur tttttudai

13 trauﬁnunt and udusntxon.

a

full

llth

13 a

itaahta: haupttal with

twig auplrvilory nt¢££ ﬁnd aetiva tumansh dvvarinont.

rhuy lﬂphﬁtiﬁt purehtanalrtaﬁallywtrltntnd pnyuhnihurnpr but

�«6m

H35Iﬂﬁ

111

vulnatarr. nanlt paﬁa-ntn tn rnitdauou in than.

inntituianuu an a civun dt£a in Jtuutry

ﬂail: urn lad

it

than.

it

1959

vurt ntuditd.

an had volum$arr-patxtatn only, a

R836

wart tcnigund hr

It‘ll

unnbur

in. ataxia tar yuyuhittrtc

avihnitin. or wurt sawhnrt at I otwouiu anhinwyhrunac ntntu
haugi‘sl Iraﬁg ﬁrtnliurrnd to! I sycatriu riannrth prajutt.
that¢.paidnn&amp;a war. umoluand tram thn aiudr hanuvn.

a: that:

nanwvulnniary abutat.

2h: study pnpuln$1un-etnnlctud at 113

p‘ttnuan uﬁ an, 190 at

K18

titan

satin

£ha

ﬁnittaruia

F

In!
C

9E

at maﬁa.

) an tho

zach pa‘tau‘

8t!

datttugtta aatg.

lithtnon Illihl taint in. knit-utn‘ rauurdn var: nualriad.
Jar an. dutarutnataoa at :cetul exams, «an Hullsngahaua
ﬂoatatar iadax

may

ntnd (

).

�“a.
Autthur tritium

of
the prtlnnoc

it:

atrtur'nt ruataruh

1‘
tan
itau
rcutzaau.
alaninit
altacttu:
grnuraut,

sh.

¢£

nuns
ﬁx:
at
pavaunt
vutiantn
at
tucaty
upgrauanutaxr
aurrny.

wart ah:9a1u.lly 111 tad use Eta: hunptiuliﬁad far ulny
Sﬁtﬁ a uwtap uuula «at annualir hnwu hunt

inst tiny

had Esau tranbturrnd tram

yturt.

in this hecpitu!

inothtv skats.1uut1tu~

taou.tuw a Ip¢aiul uindr.

rung.

it

vat anon apparant that £ht Vim: finiﬂfi

war. inturauiod an Isndyiua ntrtcind thy atllua‘aon

at

nnﬁ

in
unite
we».
prdhlann
ﬂat
éxtn.
spaaarie
urgiutswtiaa 9!

st.

varin‘xouu an ﬁnnigan*xnua a: twp: a: troatuuat and exprnualcaa

qud tar diuguonin

trantn-ut uvnlun‘iau watch aunt .n:1:~

W!

at. disfiault
3)

and

dualguuﬁtn:

and viqntrid caaiiéovnblu wxorttau

it‘s a puttuat

than; sh: institutiouu,

tut

uni»

m "um:

for

riuutv.d "unrahoth¢rupy* dittlrud

making untSQrISty

in clu:u$ti¢¢t$nn

�.9.

ditttailt.

as an.par¢hoth¢rupr

was

davicuuttd nu trus‘uunt

atlzulctornd on a yrnaurlyiton basis by

tar thigh sh.

A

aunt: raruhtatrilt,

pgﬁicut nu: churned an additional (cu.

with tho ptyahtgtrle retidant were uonntﬂursd part

at rﬁutiuu

ti 3! wuywhn‘hornpy ill

ulntntntrgttva pntxant oarc¢
to triatuont nunaionn with

Station.

ﬁha

dart‘ud

psychiatric rtnidcut. stuff

paywhintritta did not tract pgtiunts diraetly, but raitrtutod

thair sativitiom ta aapurviatns tau roaidouﬁ phywialnnn.
Sb. lﬂﬁﬁ parehatharupr

Wtﬁ

a.t1gngz¢a g: a function

Aluethiuoi-a~ parohtntrzu roatdouta. pmynholagittu.
andauui
xtudnnta. Formal
workura. nuracu and

station‘ war: not vau91noly ineiudod
and ﬁn unaariaiu which
v0 and to
‘b)

1n

at uni,
«#6131

rieard. a: tank

tau paeicut'n roger!

patients wart rucotviag puythvthqripy,

tutorviov $30 ruttdun‘ in chart. or 'uah oats.
&lt;

Itylaa his»

5%

“atlas Individu31 ialtitutionnl diuunontla
mud: uomparioanu

atrxicult.

At $13 dinuhnrgs

dtgtnvuua anplaymd tha mulﬁapln awniuuﬁtve data lﬁhlﬂﬁ

�.19.
ruccnuundol by

it.

Annrtcnn Payuhtntrzo Attestation uhtlo

tellauad unitary syatcun. 5.1.9:: nuanplou

boﬁa an :nd luau

at ﬁtnznalun Iron ark 3:. liutad in Tani. I, with

our sug-

gIatId uouvorniGnn into cathccrie: «caparablt to th. athar
tua tuctztntlnna. 1h... canvosataau prcvido, hnwavur. an
unuvotdahlt Iﬁﬂtﬁ. a: dis#¢rt1¢n. (sinilgr obgorvutian: htva

erortud

boon

’allntntok

by

and

dioata thus itaananuu within

us: anneaiuucd

$hn «an;

(

) who

in-

taut1tut1¢u arc 3130

vulatruhln to individunl dittornuaas nuang nxgntntra.;

‘ “U ”G“ .v."~.-ﬁ
fabll I
’

In

a)

Hunt vnracd

:13 an:

,

tin

'

a: I

rovunnn

I

Rating: at zupravon

in forum: ;nd actual. in. dischargc 1:113:

tripattita

with n tapnrgtc urulugtian

churicturolocxual and axudrcn: chuncsa.
global rbtluca 13 vital

txihutlnn of ciah

it

tacit:

HR

it

tar snaial.

and Kane had

In! dittiuult to saunas tan anu-

0! ‘ho Runniastr 3:06am

(rail: 1!).

�.11.

tar tux;

lwu&amp;y

sh: Hiuningar

ta ta. slahnl raﬁiugt or

rating at: ealwnrad

syndrome

an and 3533.

it. “a. .”‘*¢ *‘U’

Tiblt I!

maﬁmﬂbﬁdhaou.

that. in:
391131 013.0

a narkcd dittcrunoo in tho

tanpoci‘ton or an; $hrt¢ tuntatutaoua (tab). :31).

it. povnluttdn nun prgdauinuutly*uppar sluts uiﬁh

At urn

pa! «tut O: pitiunin in dintucs

3

«lat:

1‘ an

IV. :36 non. 1a «1‘0; v.

rare in «1:539: 11!
uavu'iu alannou
ﬁ) 53;:

and

IV nnd

XV.

whzle

a:

9r 1!, only one paﬁitnt 1:

3%

68

par onnt of patttat:

$330 57 pcr aunt or

pltisntt

9‘

rhura nut. no ﬂixxartuot. 1n

.3. distribution

:3 sh» annt1$uiioual panulgtiaan. an. firth tug paﬁiunta

at»: this! tan use at tuuuty

and one

quart.» tor.

tort: runrn

or oldtr.
e)

;:;i

fan population: dittowad tn udlaatlaaul

�Cwmf Mﬂ
2%}
maxi?"

”an
m“
19$

54cm

59

may

£0

a?“

:-

2:

_:

'

19s
53

a:

2‘33
3

13
33

,

a:-

ﬁ

1:25;;

«

�.1}.
tﬁﬁalllmnt,
$1». ihnu

putttutn at a?! haviag nmri

v&amp;§h

that. iﬁ Illa.

as

Ilia 1.11.!

In

ca&amp;

$0 camplcia

a) pat «out at

0inlxutunt

while ht par aunt

rat! in:

a:

%&amp;0

a:

ﬁﬁuﬂiﬂ

pt£1tuta

blah iChOOI, tax: 33 par ctn‘

III as: at:

u¢oaa1

IUIF£

nﬁ

graauut¢. thin finding

:-

alga. dittorauua, :lnaa tho aoainl

clan: nitsuru in, in putt, husta

an education.

a) g;§§gggs nirruroueon in the dictrabutiou at hoards
«a

th‘ salitavngn r Seal: an». ohuurvud. Pittyvonc par a¢a$

at

mra

patitnts kid

with taunt: G! 59

i

«mart: htluw J0, uud aux:

at short

..

an. Eight:

r

tith‘

pur aaa$

aeorta buing ntmun

tinted with hiahav agaruuu a: uturuetypy. In ountraat.
$336 ﬂunnty par

91v oonﬁ

ﬁt.

h.¢

«iii

sworwa

putaan$u has

t

var: hclnu 30 an

at

50 or wars.

ta.

At an

9

it

Quilt, and tartrwtua

titty pt:

aunt at

1009:: in tho maﬁa}. rung» botuaan 30 nna

E9.

3.

Wag
It:

Vggbxq

candy inclnﬁad .xauiautinn

admin: ‘9 ﬁn.

a! th¢ rulutioua at 1!.

ylythidttiﬂ vﬁrinhlnn within

nauh

inatiauﬁioa,

�~13-

I3 v.11 an Butane: inatituﬁannu. Thwli noupnrilonn provud

dixricult hangar. or dirtortnain in tho attiuitioa
rtynhiatriq

1§v1nh1un.

tn.

*urxahlnu rung.d

01 th*

tidal:

@

and achw

parnhlc wutaoxt ovltarin eeulﬁ an: by a¢t§r333td. and varying

itarcta or ulsaingdntt. .rar'uaaupza, ta canparc tnoﬁltmﬁiani
in ralntian an xgugﬁh at hatp1%‘l stay, variant cutuott p¢rtodi
auto triqd but man. allowed
33%.

:5: aqutv¢1¢at «.11 11:...

At

an. gatrtaa of tha patituts ranatnad fawn: tug: 3".»

nau‘hs. and sleuthzrﬁu “‘3. than twozsa‘aonthu.

aeutt$nt,

70$

at .11

aha auly d! any. ﬁh;a

#13:. thus:

wax

pa$iuuﬁo runninad

1...

at

mass. 13

thin atvun Ioniht,

twilia annthu. In ﬁttuvuiutug social

informatxan nvailnhlu

far

292

a:

371

patioaﬁﬁ.

unalannitiahla at!!! at». ﬂﬁlt otian ﬂair! thu nduaatsuu at
tbs knahnnd at in. {athar at a haaaowtxn

«w

ntnor

wag nwt

rnaﬁrde¢¢

aonarainxzy, in the antiwaau cf ysywhzntrﬁc variable:
euphaaaa H111 ha plmoad on the ditfmroueun botv~¢u

inattﬁutanls.

�.15..

with citattun

at vii-want tutruutut‘ituttonnl ralntannthipa

(!Ih1c IV).'
a) ﬁgggggggg_gg~gzgg!§gggs tutu: lnltltntianu, tawﬁr

patatnsa

it

xx: r§a¢1v04 Inuitao ﬁharnpy

ﬁhnn

tun instituﬁsvuu (2:31. 1). canenrrantxy

3:: or launsngur plﬁilnta
instant,

8193

&amp;

anallnr parcau‘»

act. allllid at rcaaavias

paruhau

lurta aunts: (as pursuit) raooavtu; allitu

turn: at trautaoaﬁ.

I:

t

at $3. uthnr

tt

a 9:13.17 ﬁruntnon‘

an patiunts r¢ciivanx then: ‘htr:ptua

It!

claaaltioﬁ to raaciving psyuhau

thavupy utn¢u unuh 1- conventﬁauttr again:

taint. If on: ann‘rnat

ﬁhu

aanuﬁau thgrupy. urn about

t

rniidals pnyuhtn-

paranutlsa a: pt‘ltﬂtﬂ vttalvln;

atauattuuuttr loan ‘83: 01th.: at

tho 038:: in» institutinnu.

tibia
ﬂtthsu

V

uncut harn

ouuh xnu$1t1t&amp;on, ‘30

I‘i

ralntud ﬁa=a¢1aat1uu

�.15.

a: trautunn‘ ut urn
(I: Ihtln

1V,

mitt-I

and

r taut. at both urn «ad I! (tibln If),

and plynhnthurtptun aura semiautd, para

hittsac a awntrnut u! inattaa
Putatuta
KFﬁ

who W0?!

yuan;

it

thtftpitﬂ.)

ané puyuhclostnsl

urn hr who‘s

r nuara was

19:

it

or 33 ruoetvnd plychothnrxpy 91th sveltar rrnquanay than

pattonil

who

var. altar or ihﬁ hid task

achAQvunan£ and cua$u1

r ttﬁtti.

Eduagtiannl

alas: did not axgntxluanﬂly artist

culucticn at tromﬁuautlut nay huupit¢1.

luau; in: plyuhittriu vurlablau within ﬁlah inntitnttuu,
iigsnuuta ﬁgs

ﬁha

unit highly rnlattﬂ variabzo

$e

sultatioa

a: traaﬁnnkt. aquatic trot‘nnat wt: natcutud tar p‘tiuntn
clunoittod

t:

auhtuoyhrauiu ind nttqctavo diaardur mare

than the-y utttoud

I! purchonn§r¢tl¢. Bituhtrﬁa avuiugtton

n5 urn and aurgtioa

at hanyitgliuat$uu at an

rathid s.

at trtntuant.

ulna

titan

culmntion

At

and annc wow.

MPH,

p:t1natn

rceoivtac anun$¢c trnnwn¢nt (pradunlnnntxy that. «lann§é as

�“17.
hnucvur. than. nt :33 rcnuluua lencur ihnu ﬁt as
Iudnnd.

‘3. 1nt¢rtunc1tut1au§1 dalxnruaupt

n pataaaﬁ

ta ta. «lanai .2:

pitalistd tar chIVd
1a the

ytuncclt

.3.

at

to :rtaﬁ taut

an: airy 112.1:

cramp

aonthn or new.
group

worn

at

at

lHRGQ

$0 ha

ha».

£18 than wuru paﬁiuutl

Hana.

ﬂuwtmﬁnuudaﬁma «tr-bun an '-

Emﬁlc v thwut

hath

a) Diuggggzgz 3h. d$a%ributtou o: dtnchuraa titanium!

1:

shown $u

lﬁblu VII. Fur ututtutionl uuuiyail three diugv

rustic grasping:

warn undo:

nahtiuphvania, attactlvn attoraara,

aaa yirﬁhﬁh¢VFIi5§ and ysrioualtty ﬁtuordarn. 1k: diuunuutiu
pvupovitoaa nur‘

ttntlnr for in. El tat

popuxntiona, but

H330

sh: urn pa‘imatd warn rncnrﬁad at having f$WIr tttnattva and
unhatuphrunit diavrdaru and a luvs.» nuuh‘r

a: ptrahununrwtla

a: pgrnannlity datnrdors.

Intriinliitntiiuui
and 3

unuiyuts

nhnmnd

near. cur. allitad ta «13:30.10:

that

it

:t

an bath mat

urn us. glow: of

�.18..

it.

aaaaal tuuﬁuru «at ruiatad to atununoiug

non;

a: ‘h; I'd!!! VtrtlbIQi

have

ckintrta vaviabltu. diagnnuil
tutu hmnpital ‘0 atlcoﬁtoa
pitalahntawn; and duty

it.
is

um,

r:%ad

It

at

ham»,

it.
4;

picniltuuntty rtln‘uﬂ at

711

tr

huna

(via.

In ouch knupttul. rant pttttnts

”mm.

um

“ingrovnd' (ink). VIII).

(195) 9:

”an“

'tniupruvtd' lad calr a taunt. pltwtus

’rauovawad‘

at

ihtut barn

tau. at diuahurgi

mum-v

dwra‘lun

£0 «Inuhnruv ovtlunﬁaon

d) gigggg;§g_§ggggg3§ggs

¢1tluutnﬂ

u. rdlutcdt or ‘ha para

a: $rotiuan$ Ian

1% H8

1:51:

who

that: at lure

“math tupanvud'.

mu

van c.1125

the highest para-ntata a:

”rtcuvurad” at “unit isprovna' rating: (255) and

tht luwaut

(10;)
with sauna at muse.
prupawstcu a: "unimpruvwd‘
Antlynau vi‘han Utah anlﬁtﬁuttan

giant: varinhlb rulnlil.

�.19”
At 8! and Inna

that: III

C

sinncuay tgr

cldir putluaﬁt if b.

rutnd butt.» tan: ytuatar «uni. hut tut renal.»

illr lilnitiﬂiai

Quty-ut us. At awn

trend, with ulnar

pttituti

intrt

an!» lxkuly

tr.

atatxnttuu

vat tn upwtsitu

is h.

ruﬁud unimpravnd.

�~29»

m mum
In ibis unvpar‘ntn at ihro¢ vuluutary garuhittric

httpitala

Vt havu-abttrVad

sartoransua q:
cannttlun and

uninitiuaat tutarxnstituttounl

varaubloa
3.61:1
tho
in
at yuavs a:
pt‘itnti

tutti:

Illﬂi, but

00$

u¢.; ta diutriiustou a:

ﬁulttuvniu I‘Eaalu trawli; and in unﬁt of tun triniulnt wart»
$51.0

ditivtbxttnn a: aansuauuu sud dinohnrgu tvnlnaﬁtana. In

and

quxinal atlltlai

‘33

in

..

dnrnﬁatn a! havpitaltsutzan. tdiauistn or transnaaia

it:

§1r£oraacou
naapxtnl diner tbs «Enutha

alyahtairac vtrlannu rut. nuarthnd ta airinruuaul an

sunuclﬁiud
and
wins:
the
nacial

ttctarn at causatiun Ina utavio~

iapy n‘ raxlo¢tta in ya. v mourn. In
ﬁhn

trimhgapttux

atair,

tntnrtautatattausl-aﬁnyaritanu a: the pirahtttrta Vitib

«big:

I!!!

thaw

uiguitiannt sixtaruuogu, and §h§na rulluw

nupuatsa «attributiaa
thﬁ

its.

tars

a: ﬁt!&amp;l1_.1ﬂll, aduuntaaa

tinnisiodnﬁ Vast at

tat hryathutis 1a:

inaﬁitut&amp;nua1 caapuriaaat, wharc

it um:

and
1a

Oh!

r naorng

in.

iaﬂvuu

tutiaiputgd {ant iocttl

�.21”
wartu
in
puythtu§r10
bu
valntad
ulna
ulna: ditturtucau vault

cvuravlltng
uh:
1n
;ty1an.
dxusnaaitu
But
vuranttdna
whiuu.
in3$1ﬁut£¢ua1 varlnttnnt

1n

cud
hamytiuiiuatxtu
duratinu at

Affautad
anﬂ
«unvaritau:
thaiu
vatautad
diuchsvgu rattan:

tho signatscun¢¢

0%

tbs inturhinuittutianil.aunpnrisauu 3!

ﬁn

iﬁliiﬁﬂiiiﬂl'ﬂ¢*
aaltcttun
at
tracing:
It?

idlﬂﬂiid taint

ﬁhru: institution: a: bqing aduparuhid in

“‘11;

Int,

acaaamta,

rotuntitie

nué th¢rap¢utia

aﬁ$aa£pattus
rigor.

printiynt ditttruntui

ninth
nampaaisAou
await}
in the

thair putaaaﬁa. run:

were

atrtaruni in whatnl alts! puttivni

prﬁhiana
aathaﬂuiuczcal
thu
bu‘ nest Itriktus sure
Vida dinsrdp;ua10u

a:

mm

in:

in tha atrialﬁtuus a! tha plvuhtttrla

wiriuhloa.
can aaa¢1usian qoalé be

that t§c dh‘nrvnd difzurauacc

in purahiatric Viridhlut uqrﬁ

littln act.

1dianyasr:a1n¢. wt: «untrant ta

in
hnapihglxsod
urn
ptttuatt

ta;

than aéninxntr‘iﬁon

laughs ¢t tam: taut

33% 3nd name

in an arm‘s,

�n22»

havuvir th¢$.1$ in $53 1£k01?‘§h be a raiiccﬁiou a: mixturiuaui

ta 5h: ﬂip:
in

it

«nah aduluiu§rut1va

:avquﬁtiuu

tanturcu an noupluniﬁy u: diachiutta

hnﬁ dtuahurnu

avalaataon, tinny a: tharipiti

lVI11£31l uni thy énfiaitlou
and sauna

“kink

::

fin atttarnncut

quuttﬁy or uaatnl niiarahr.

airiiuiaa

at

garchothurany are arcat

dsxturunaoc £«11nu n gntturn.

canttstant vath.9ruvioun randinxn

A

-.

yatturu

and hypuuhunal on

tan rataﬁann.at toaiai :actaxi $9 pxyuhst‘rzu «a»; at hampxiﬁln

tlid ﬁttinntt. It is palsahtu taan, that tau
oabﬁky

a!

ﬁn

inatitution in

aawivnd

ta

t

trauﬁnnnt

putt.

stuntsiatnt uxtint

sociajmyahalmaintl
tautuvna ﬁt in» pliiunﬁ
Ivan thn prcdoutnant
popnlntxan partly in rolatinn in the proatpticun, uttiﬁudcu.

identificatian
rulatian to
darivud

and asparntsaas

{ha nxpcatationa

thcir nuainl

a: tha ntnrf

and

pnrtly

0: tbs patient: and that!

1n

fililiti

buekground.

rhino nothﬁdalagical dittieultiou «nu the ntgnxtiaant

arrant or gdmsniptrnﬁivc and stat: uttttndua

on

pnyuhtatrto

�.93”

vuraiblcn «r. vuluvnni

it

She cauvunﬁtaaal was

itVt utntavtacg. ugpa¢iu117
thuvapius. The rrtqnaut

in:

1a

may

a:

avu1§;ﬁ$nn

or aaup¢rn~

at ynynhtstrda

4£I¢hargQ vuiinga, diuwaantic

algaanu or I-agth a! heaptttlixntioa us

arisiria o: $h¢rtpvutlc

valuua ar computability or aubzacts and pﬁﬁﬂlltiaui
3.3%

ta .xailutvo arrnr unlit:

ugtahoé
sawing

It:

ﬁn:

at.

inatitttaena are olanrly

aauini¢trattvc philoncphy uni l9¢1l1 «1:0:

a! papulntiua

nut variablgt

..

ta nﬁutznn 9:1:

at that study.

ruiluvt in naeiuat to:

thilt

litnral tatirprctution of

Thu

saﬁw

ﬁne

in.

paraéexiaal

mast 91.13:.

altar. at :

variablus is in bu

Cut abanrvatioa

nonpu«

noun

1: a

at that atuiy. 1h.

tub
hawk highly trutand reactant! «and!¢t1as tyeaiuaut
ﬁ?!‘htn
an
or
iiunx
puriod:
(unlinitcd)
shiah is appliud tar aptiutl

pepulntians with in: luau: prapcrtint alaguusnﬁ in In untuv¢r*
uh1¢ pragnautic gravy (cdhisephruuiu)

item

a: ttvaruhls trvnﬁuaut fﬂltl‘.

.-

and

sat, «a. proparv

it iho pomrtct. it Hand,

in cantraci, «hat: tug 1¢nst trusuta tharnpiutt 13:1: trnntuauﬁo

�u’hu

to:

tho

attrt¢r periods, to

a yapulutita with a higher pam-

pnrtann daugucuta nchxsopkvautn (v‘po¢r yrngnosua 1) tau
pvuportiou or ttvurt§10 Jiaahlxca rttiaga 1a

artuturl ahibualr. thtta obturvutltan

an

act

uizutfitaatlr

rail-It

thy

itarapuuttc hfftcacr a: th¢au tantatntainu. but indiuutun

tn.

dartbwuat
1&amp;1:

critarta a: inprwvcnaat.

Inc! or «barity in diagnostic unhona‘a sud incompar~

ability at paychtntrto trantnuat variation Ital: pants to
:tttlwtud calpurattvu

«$3613: or paywhigtric thavapiun.

Iii

I!»

txanpla, thu vacant failure: by wiricua kaolactcnl natuut1¢ta
to confirm ubuartatiana 3:66 in ether laburntlvan: hay'bu
an much a

raxluotian a! diffuranaiaa in populations, pavuﬁtu

atria «attoriu, 233.
rha'waéaayraad asa

at

an £311u¢1oa 1n the
numb

original hypnthaucu.

turn: ‘3 “Inhinophrantuﬁ an

'9»:ahou¢na¢sau* to unplaro eh. uhancot 1n payuhologsenl

a:

bialagiatl roaturca with anntnl illnouu h;n 1.4 ta a scaled.
burdcnad by acautivc

result: (3.11:3). hast u;rkaa rauuutly

�.3...
an

in. tantztnting railing at

tn.

rnacc a: «taunts

cud paywhulngatul

a unrun ruvtav an cﬁhiiaphrnatn:

fit in. whiz:

thnripitu or

ﬁne

transnatarinn

if

aauaatu

inuuqruvakxltty.ot Git

phywznzaganaz *~ huhnriuraz corvulattnun an aunt an

(Fuuktnat§zn) and tadattan thruahala ﬁaaks¢

Erna

it. uuaholrl

«art

:

vaxtd

ﬁbulrvusiua in hi rtvurtad traa tug alxntt, do w: hhva nuthtd!
avn$lub1n $9 «uteri»; yepalntﬁaus.aduquataiy

sauna num£Xraation? .Wu.ha11¢vu not,

mad

ta gravid:

a

nunnludo tron ﬁhnﬁi

«bairvatiuuu that incruuugd attuatiua aunt bu ynxd ta tha
suathodnluwiani yrnblnud

mm“, mm

a:

alunuzﬁyias nubauaia by “ubgnaﬁavu‘

ma. um mum: mama

no hﬁahly ﬁuyaudunt on

inatiﬁntianal and

and tau zun£ap¢y¢hu1nainal tapuwtx

which

«was: to to

«bauwwir att1$aﬁula

at in. ﬁhurtpiahmyntimuﬁ

intirauatmng
what aw tha ralmilan

at again: ﬂlﬁiﬁ

t¢»psyeh1x%r1a

trantnunﬁ an t§aﬂa pdyulutiamx? aﬁgnzfitant dittiraaaaa

it

trcutwant anttavn taint betwoun thaau anntatu$aans, nné thqr

‘

�~26»

ds-auﬂdr ﬁg dilrgmnuﬂ moat: Inuiul attuvam,

utthﬁdalauiaal limitliauan umtlinaﬂ
wan-no gruuﬁar a dcﬁawninuni

hit with!»

ﬁhc

ilviitv, iaﬁinl atuti

pirkhtnﬁvia
Sh!
Vittthiun

if

«athin any inititutznu than «or: aha «ﬂan» varidblam‘ ﬁn

«nuns «may.
hauuvur,

that

m:

away” 1»

ﬂay ianaiduraiaun

«him

«a.

m we

a: vctturna or

at in.

may,

&amp;&amp;:¢nosin and

ﬂitting.

tharimx unnuaﬁ

laniri

I! it

that-in that! haupxtalu, patiunt twain! tiara

graﬁmhau

thn phitnaqphy

twcuﬁnua%

as an intruahaapisal thutar. 11 Ian: tutanttatr malttnd tn

diigniﬂxl «nu try: bf ﬁruiinuuﬁ than int naturt a:
vﬁduti hﬁnpiial uni uh» iﬂﬂill canny
aaaraaanu

tum iaaim

it wh£th it‘prtalriir

:t-azr.

an: paraaunbl a: mazxnaaa lbuyiiil, tantra», likb thmt

a: in: sunningar‘ﬁhnaraal

awn: mm“

mm

unsp1$a1 wad ﬁn. laxtauhuutttu

m: WIN:
a

In institution: with 31f£¢v¢ni

ﬁxmmm

trt‘tntut iriunﬁatiﬁnu.

pntaibta taut eitrarint witntiuhu

hutw&amp;ua

it in

theta vurtibtni

�wa?ﬁ

any ”a

‘h“r“‘i

In hntpitnli. gar ixuaplé.

whﬁwl

trnutnant

n‘=‘¢£&amp;Iru¢ urn pvﬁnarilr auutnatuz or «um-tic, or «hurt

nut: nuns” mun anagum m
inﬂiviauui tacit} alas»

it in: in:$itt$&amp;uu

may

auﬁ xxx

cm

Win-mat

awn,

diiiﬁngﬁiah‘ﬁrtihﬁtni grwapte x$

azatt uua aﬁministwuiivt attitgdat

urn a ﬁriﬁiﬁl Vﬂrzabla in auﬁarnintae tan pa‘iani‘n dinnnnitl;

irauﬁnuut, qua tiawtk at haupiaaligaﬁica.

�culpartnoa a: Suctopuyuhaloglcgl Virtublos nan
Psychiatric frnniuunt 1n rite. 'blult‘ry laopltalu
A

ru.».‘; In:

Rdbart L. xnhn.

ramnnsk,

rn.n.

la‘hautcl 311.01. 95.9.
and

In:

Iris

113k,

8.3.

tho nontriuont or lxportncltnl Paychtntry,

ltllaido

loupatnl, Glen Oaks, 3.1., 1.2.
£1404 in part, by grant nxuaoyz u: tho lhtlounl Innt1$u60
or lontal ﬁatl‘h, 8.8. P3511. Health survlco; and the luau.»
county ﬂoutnl Ioal‘h Basra.
tho oooporaﬁtoa at tho stutto «t tho Intiuchuaotta ﬂau$a1
lonlth Gout-r and tho c.r. loaning-r nunartul loapi‘nl 1o

stat-fully

:

acknoulodcod.

Division
or
Hvutcfloro
Psychiatry,
ﬁnnpttnt.
;;U:;ut'tgdruaas
!
’ I
C

v11:

Q

3/62

�I: that:

at in.

law lav¢u psychiatriu put10n%
populutauu, lollinxphcaa and iodlxch r-porﬁud Iicn1ttonut

utuﬁy

rotatloanhlpc hair‘s: nu individua1’u pantttou in tho tacit!
01:3: struottro :34 tn. provalanoc It treat-d 111-03., £ypcn

at diagnouod dalorduru and usual 03¢ duratxan a: puyahttﬁvtu
trcntucut ndntatu‘orod ( ). tiny indicatod that proportionntoly nor. 10rd: 0130. pasxnutu in stout-cut vow. clalilfitd
an psych-‘10 whtiu ‘ppar clas- pattcu‘a vow. Iﬂfllttil ulna-1ttod an noarotto nud parannnltir disordcra. n-unrdloll at
digglouiu, plyuhciharupy was Inplcv.d 1a diaproyorttoaa$cly
high 4.:rooa with tho uppor at... pntloutu. and annual.
thtrnpto: with lcvcr clans subjects.
1h. Stilt-no. or cacnunio Iﬁnt‘u :34 the availability
§0I1d
or ﬁroa‘iug POIIOIIII
not in cauludcd 1n £hou¢ t‘Idlﬁl.
to tout the 901. or noctll_tnctoru 1: tin trcsiacut :1 ho:pitalxnod puﬁaon‘a indopusdoat a: plutont's tinnncuu and
:vuilubxllty at tro:tnon$u. n yntlca‘ turvoy val undtrtakuu
1951.,x: u:at nan-u.
a «rut:
:of treatment nod... including ildavsdual paychothnrapy ans
orgnuau ‘hnrnpiou ‘90 nvnilnbln ta :11 ptt1ant: rccnrdlcsn

mun:

ct ‘htir ablli‘r

maul,

t. guy.

In ﬁhnﬁ tauplo. 33s. tduuutton and plant or birth var.
otgnsrinnntlr luuoutntod with chain. ot.‘rautnont, durataoa

at hilplﬁtllll‘illg allutnal discharge ivuluatiou

‘30

�lllﬁntlii

(

).

it. gltatcul factor: war. 11-. ralltod

to

a non-Ira a: utorootrpy. tho calttorntu 1 Seal. ( ). ltxhcr
r acoran tor. turn ur‘on round in pilliatl dauguoaoi a: tuvolntaouul parlhnlzl rctqrrod for sciatic thirty: and hours.

taliiod to: a shortcr yuriod ( ).
It It. concluded that ti. extant. a: postal altar, uno.
ldi'ttiol. htrthplaaa and dagrco a: atarnotrpy on psyohtu‘ric
ﬁrtatnca‘ pnt‘uvnu VII. uoﬁ a roault at cannanta tno‘orn at
availgbtlttr of troutlunt .10... On. tugxon‘iun was that
3001.1 :hcﬁ'rl tuIquu-od diagnouin :ad tronsncat by atrociing the varbsl and avg-vnrsnl nynptc- pattarnl at pats-It
behavior. It was puntnla‘cd tha‘ nubauo£l at lcvor lusts!
all-sou. Inna-r oduot‘tua :34 £03.13. Birth vault nartroqnontly'unuttcnt lynptuun

non-Vtrbal. IOBIOPI or IOtO!
pnttnruq cud
«avast phyolonl noﬁsa or thurapy. Huger
ulna. subject. will! utiltic Vtrhal non-n at gunman-10:,
and patintputn paycholngioal turn: at troninun‘.
A non-ad xn‘crprctataon rilnﬁod plynh11$r1¢
trnutnont
‘0 tho philosophinn and uttxﬁnduu or individutl payuhtatrints
and hatptttl ntat! nttttudou. II 1&amp;3‘1‘n‘10ll what. patch.»
thartpy Ill hluhlr vulucd. typo: 011-0 pnttunin vculd b.
‘rontod dispruyorttountcly with ptyuhath'rnpr. ataxllrly.
dischargc ovuluattonn tad durut1on a: honpttalltntaon U'lld
1n

it'll

be uttcctcd by

itttaroncol :u o‘ttt unpootutioau tor individlu
all or distortu; noctal «13.3.

�.3.
In

to“ m. «and menu“ I. «cum: u up.“ $0

lillaldo (ll) :tudy

unploytns tin can. proctdurcl :ud
tons-trout}: to attend thu diacrquIGnl to in. 0th.: taut:tu‘tonl. ‘hu 0.1. leanings! nuuurtnl inapltll at tarot.
(If!) and tho llaunoinncttc lautal lcnlth cantor a: loaton
tultt‘uﬁtann worn loloaﬁod in tho Impoo‘nttan
(ulna).
‘In$ tiny servo putt-at: .8 ditrursux 30.1.1 clunuou and
1951

It...

thnt ditfcrOIcoc an ‘hta dinanatuu uculd ho rofinotod in
tho trnatucnt vurtdblou. In that. houulnlu $huro 10 a minim
lnrlty 1n attitudo £OUIrdI ‘rcntnaut aad oduna‘tou. Inch
1: a ‘oaoltug haapt‘ox with n {:11 $hlo Inpcrvtaorr utntt
and out£v0 research dapar€n0a$. tiny 0:93.013. plythae
t-nlrttcalxy-orlontod payohttharupr but gravid. 0‘30: trcnt~
lint. inslnlan; taunts. thcrcptou and activ. prosrnss or
I111ﬁl £harnpy. Each :troinlt Ihlrtutarl troutnont or
valuntnrr puttautl, does an‘ gravid. cuuﬁodial car. and
toads t. d!!! 1‘: pu‘aont pcpnla‘tou trim 01:11:: as. groups.
It. Ipouttio till a! £hxl study var. ﬁt duttrntna popu13‘103 airfares-Ia toﬁvccu th- thrlc lun‘tﬁltioan with roupcct
to social 01..., a... cantatlol und 1 learn, and to roln$a
‘hunc patient attractorta‘tcn to tho trouﬁuca‘ variables c:
twp. o: ‘rauinout. durut1on or hanpitaltua‘ton, ligament:
Ind iililltta uvnlnniitu.

�.5.

am
vuluntnry. adul‘ putiuntn 1n rustic... In ‘htll
tuntttuttanl on a 31v.- dn‘c ta Ignutrr 1959 new. studiod.
“£11. Ill and as had vnllntary 9a‘1cn‘l only. 3 0:311 nuniar
a: ‘Inuc It also not. nultlnad by tho court: tor paychtntrtc
ovulittton. or war. numb-r. a: a chronic achtsnphroatc utt‘o
holpttul group transforrud for u upocltlo ranoarnh p30500‘.
than. pataousn aura «natal-d tram tin Itudy b¢¢uulo of tuna:
Ian-vnlunﬁcry status. !Ia I‘I‘V population nountntnd a: 113
patinata at II, 100 a‘ Its sad 9S ut ulna. tutu pattcu‘ III
¢1vcn sh. calitorntn r 00.1: ( ) on tin doatgnntod data.
Bastian: mouth: taint the paﬁtcntl’ rccurda war. anulynod
(hr Oh: variant social and payshinﬁrl: taster. If sh. titty.
1hr tho daﬁuruinatton a! social claua. t5. lulltngshaad
autuc‘ar luau: was hand ( ). rho utudr thalidod ulnnxan‘aon
a: the rolntacua or ﬁhn 0001.1 to it; payahtaﬁrtc vurtublot
within tack tau.atu‘lon. .3 3.11 a: tutu-on tnuti‘attonl.
otnpurtnonl pravnd dttttcnlt basin-o at littoral... 1:
the dutinttton at the paychtnﬁric vurinbloa. ‘Io variabloa
ranged #11017 lad cnnparnhlo cutout: orttarta 00:16 30‘ to
d0$urnanua, and varying dour-on at 31:31:. 41“. lb: uuunplo,
to acnpnru tnctatuttonl in rola‘son to length of haupltnl
u.ny. Vlrlitl ouﬁoott potion. wore ‘raod but I... IIIIIOG
for gilpurnbln dtnttlbuianun. At III, on. Q‘nrtnr or the
pattuata tonuilcd raw-r this cart: nouths. tad wwvo‘hlrdo
L11

it...

�.5“
than twtivu nan‘hn. A: Illa. :3 contract. 701 at :11
61
only
Inca
‘htu
rauntnad
nor.
00"! nath:. I.‘
pitiilil
that ﬁnalv. mantra. I: inturututug coats: 01:1. ‘haro vac

IGIO

08
89!
for
uVIilabll
lltlrlaﬁtul

union accurrad what. thy 06‘3ct10n

wit.

.r in. tn‘hnr at I ulnar

Pittoatl. Incluluttinhlo‘
of tho hm:hand of a not...

371

not ruccrdod.
Anacrdtus, 1n ﬁho auolyann or payuhaasrto variation
ouphunia will be glucod on tho asst-runaun botvacu sastzﬁutlouu.
with ostnttuu a! rutnvnnt antrn-tnttstnttaunl roln‘ioashtpa.
was

�~6-

3mm:

I.

tn no
Whoa riparian; Itndtal 3:1: I hano’inlsatuttou, £30
ltruttlro if it. hanpt‘nl 1| takcu for nrnntod, and ui‘h-r
ilﬂﬁf04 I? 8.ﬁ*1‘ild brinrly. luvtvur. 1n atnaytuc a
cuupnrabia
Gut:
13¢
gather
nttaupttag
Itransn tlntitutian
t.
1::51tn-V
butt-an
tho
differ-nae:
many
1at
tﬂhrd
3.4:
II.
$103.. It. hosp1§a1 organisatsun a: a datnruianat a: grantnout in on: nothndolocie prohlcu. Far oxnnplo. bu‘h £h.
mane and III havu dny houpttal unttc, while an doc. 39‘.
A. name the ﬁeottias phwuxciun can our. tar a patioat an In
Qho
and
an
sitar-taro
any
tbs
in
hacpt‘ul.
tacpattuut,
clinic. II Inch a ustttnn, ha 0‘! Ital tree t0 «tachnrgo
the pntlont tron tho Ioupital at tn curlxsr «sit. kl¢V1lﬂ
that he v11: still bu ranycnsitil £09 hi: pntxont's c;rn;
what-an at In, dischargd lint! tnwuinnﬁiou «I shut putiost-

1.

I

rclttionlhtp.
tu-thar probluu an: cu. princnea «I dittoront ruuourch
the
.2
‘15.
routines.
¢1$i10a1
ti.
attoctin:
it
progra-u.
the
91810.1. at
a:
porcont
tunity
upprcutnatnly
IIIVQI.
sane acre chroszaally 111 and had but: haupl‘nlttoa for
hnvo
ban:
in
unrn:XIr
u
such
act
that!
zrc‘p
nan: y-arl.
thin honpttnl hit tiny and icon trtatturrﬁd Iran anathur
donﬁer

Ittt-

Anntttl§£un for

That,

it.

t lytiill silty.

vary tactqrn to war. tut-routed in Itn£rin¢

�.7“

situated ‘ho coll-ataoa and arguaisa‘:¢a .: tit dttn.
ap.o::1- grails-l var. noted :- do.1¢ua.1¢an 0: try: a:
trout-tut, (sag-nattc torn. and actlnntlouwor troutucnt

outta...

.)

naggiggtigg at 3:23 2; rrggﬁucntc 2h. crttorit tor
looignntlng that I past-It r¢ouivud 'parohothornyy' dirtorod
anon; tun tastttntioul, waking unitarnltr in olntlttscatsuu

difficult.
At

Iii p:yohothcrnpy

tru;;nant
34.1.II
‘ stat: paychintrtat,

was dal13n1§od

tttoroa on a pronurtpttoa banxl by
lb: uhxch tin patiunt was citrate a ton.

sonbaaan with

the payohia‘rio rnnidoa‘ v.20 countdnrod part a! rcutxao
nintnlutrattvv yaﬁinnt Giro.
At In plythothcrtpy Ill dcttnod at trtntnqnt caution.
vith ‘ho plyohto‘rtu raaiduat. Stat! payohattrtn‘o dtc not
trgut pl‘ltuﬁl. but rootrlcsad that: cctavt:aos to cupcrva-tag
tho téﬂlﬂOi‘ phylacxaao.
At tho lune pnythc‘hornpy val dalxcnasud an a (tactic;
of Ian: diocipltaca ~~ pnyshtu‘rio rusadoatu, psychololiatu.
Iactal Iurkorn, strata and nodical students. III-n1 accords
at such stations vow. n9$ routtnoxy taclndoa 1n the pntlonﬁ'u
rouurd and to :lcurtain thigh pu‘iontu roociv¢d piytho§lurapy,
tn. rouidnn‘ tn charge at oath a... van lu‘trviovtd.
h) Diagnaaaus ludividUll 1::‘1tn‘10na1 dtugnoittc
atria. ﬁll. and. ocupcrisnnn litticult. At K!B din-barn.

�diagnouol nuptqycd tut nultipin cvnlnn‘ivn dn‘n sch-no
raculncadod hr thy tntrtouu Paychlu‘rtl 1.00:11‘1uu whilc
both in .36 male rolllvod unt‘ury ayutana. anvural 11:191..

at

IJI arc

iihlo I, vl‘h our in:sootcd convurliona tutu catuturica eunyurthlo to tho 0th.:
11.130000 tru—

ltuﬁod in

fags; convvrizoas provtdc, havcvar, tn
unavnidabla taste: .3 diutartioa. (31:11:: aboarvntluau havb-nn roperﬁnd by Pas-Inuit: and him tauoetstad ( ) wha
indicat. that dilzuntaa Within tho tine tantitutloa Ira db.
vulnnrnhlo to individunl titraruacua Ilia: examaacraa
ﬁve lunﬁiﬁuﬁlouu.

u--O-“.““.
{thin I
”’W‘.ﬂ u...
c) gtlobnrlg Ragggln a: Ingggvcmcut: Rating: 0: invrQVOo
aunt wart-é 1n (splat and dotall. It. discharge rating at
nil was $r1purt$£o with a inparu§a cvaIunilun tor soatal.
ottrac‘urololttal and Irndrona canteen. RI and tune End
clubs: ratings in which 1‘ VII difficult ta attain the can.
‘rtbuﬁton at such tuct¢~ n: tn: 1!! Iyltuu (rnhic 11). Fur
than ntuiy gt. 3!! lyndrawc rating van unwanted to it: global
rgttuc' a: an and line.
C-” t .“G‘”.
Q

Tibia

XI

”“ﬂ“Q‘O”
a. Booicgtzphologgggl Virgabloc

�‘9.
Scotti amp-u; that. at: a ngrkad dixttrcuuu ta ta.
.0013} alas! count-$Qton at ‘bn tire. annta$nttonl (tibia 111).
g}

at.

.t

as
praduninnutly “pvt? 0130!;
nxddlc .1333; and at mane, produatnauttr loan! 01‘33.
h) ﬁgs: Thar. war. no daltcroiaul in 01' itl‘cihltina
in tho tus£1sntiounl popula‘aonﬁ.
o) pdn¢uﬁgggc The nopuln%toas dittarod in oduaataounl
attstauant, with pniitu£l at If! havtuu not. glut: a: sinustiou than than: at 3:36. ﬁhlin k1 per aunt of ‘hl pusiunﬁl
3‘ Hana tutled to aauplotn high cahool. only 32 par canﬁ at
an tud 23 par cant aﬁ urn did not grndutta.
d) r Sacra: natturuuaaa 3. tin ata‘rlbnslcn a: metro.
an tau calitnruiu ! 3131. war. oblorvcd. Itrth-oao pot ennﬁ
at urn pattaaﬁa had I soar-n hcldv 30, and eat: ctgh‘ not «out
wi‘h start. 0! 50 or thaw. ~~ tn. highnr ? neuron 3.1:; .8..egatnd with higher 6.3!... at sgurcoiypy. In coa‘raut, at
unnc tumuﬁy par ccnﬁ var. halo! 30 at tho 2 30.10, .Id fortytuo par cant hnd intro. 9: 50 or more. At an titty par coat
0! it. patiuatu hnd r an.rua in £hu utddln rgagc botutoa 30
and £9.
3. szph§ggg$g Vutiuhlgt
In‘rnainutttuttunnl oonparinoau urn counotidatod 1:
tabla 1', while tutaroinlt1£u§10nal unitartitul It. prancu‘od
indiviﬁnullr 1n llih not$tcn. In ttbl. IV, ntlbu and payohou
thcrnptoo var. cnnbtnad, parntﬁtana I oontract a: 30-311: uni
At 81! the population

�pcycholcglaal tharaplnu.
3) 8.1.0.1.: or troatunu‘: ‘80:; inn$1tu.1ona, lunar
6%
fOOOSVDd
ulna,
$hat
naught.
or
thornny
I!
I?!
at
yl‘iontu
(iuhlo V). OOIOIBIOC‘IV suallcr various... at tho urn
pu‘tontl taro 31:35.6 :3 rootivis¢ paynhoﬁhorapy, with u
largo tank.» (36 putt-at) ratotvxna 31110: torso at ‘roa‘o
tout. 1t an patsonta rocotvtn. nilxou thnrnptou at. Clﬂliltic¢ an raoniviu: plyluothoragy no i yrs-3:1 Iroatnuut ItIQO
sank pattnntil cantonxtanily 3.01:; 3 3.014033 ply-htnsrict.
003331.
or
rnuctvtnx
tho
plﬁtuu‘a
pcrnonﬁtnc
ion‘ruct
on:
I:
thornpy, urn ﬂhl'. nighttlctntly loo- thlu intact 02 .3.
o‘htr tun anlﬂ1£itaona.

.

”U“.

d.-.”ﬁ-‘.”.’..~”

£311. 1 abuu‘ barn
ao¢1a1«paynholoui¢a1
P
Old
acorn
nun
Alon;
fuotlro,
nannisieantly rolatad tn sraawnout nsloc‘ioa (0160» and highsr

r Basra

patzom‘a

at ups;

and 9

ant. froqucntlr'vccosvtna somatic therapy)
8.0:. can tainted to troaincnt ooloo‘ton n‘ 33.

athar taa‘ora utrc Itgnaticauﬁ. Ian. of ti. '001n1psychological factor: II. rclntta ta try. at trottaon‘ at
nuns (tabla IV).
Luau. ﬁn. purchx‘tric vurtabios vi‘hin ouch inntttutiou.
diagnosit at: ntgnitso:ntzy‘rolntod 1a '11 tutu. hospital-x
discharge ovaluntton ‘t I?! only. had dura$1an or hocyt‘nltunttoa

I.

�.11.:

it

an and nano. sonata. troaanan‘ nun aolaotol for pattunta

clnnuittud

nu ochisnphr-nta

titan that

$hoa¢ cluaaod

tad attactivu diacrdar “or.

a; paychgnnlzotio at oath htartt;1.

urn. pataanﬁ: roootvinu acnatxn truaﬁuont (prudnnilaatly
that. tlaa¢ad as Ichanophrontn) raeulvcd ditahnrso rattncu
at Iniupruvud nor: artua than pntianta rnnttvini payohoth-rspy
At

nlonn.
b) BI!&amp;I&amp;I! a: BIG 1it11 'zttat 1k. fir-c 11¢t1$ut1¢ul
dittorod with roaptot to pnticu“: ltauth at utly (2‘51. 71).

”an“

was mat-nu: 19‘s.", um 65$ at gaunt.
taunt-1n. tar traits «oath. .r usrc, compare: ta 31 par cnn£ at
‘ta 1! puttonta and only 5 par aunt 0! than. at nuns“ 2h.

an

andul aﬁﬁy st ‘30 In group it: bctvnoa save: and nl¢vnn
noatha I311. tau-thirac at the anus pattun‘n var. diach§r¢od
within '1! uoathl a: houpttnlinnﬁtou. 8.01.1 oinnu and
3 $3020 we». utt rnlutod id aurution at nay tultltutiou.

ti. psy¢h1n£rio vurinblua. III! 613330.13 coula ht rtlntod .
ﬁg ﬁhnao diuanantd ll achtsorhrouia utro bnlpttalaucd tar
inncor puriaﬂi .t each instii‘tscn. at «vary .3. 1.7.1, it...
a:

at urn ran-incd loagar

tuna Qt 38 av Hana. Iadctd. tun lituriantieutiontl dirrcronuon turn a. gruat that a yattcnt in

m clan-tn an» m m. lit-11 u be mutant“ “r
tulovt manta: or

more

ut urn thug war. putaautn in

ﬁne

"II‘II‘ ts. Irv!) at x386.
Within initiﬁatﬁnns.

as.

andauducu‘1oa

at

xxx tad an

�a“.
war: wizntad ‘0 lsucht a: honpitnliﬁatzuu -« runagir tad 1.0:
olucutnd pstanntn rinninits for tho linxca‘ porioi

tail. 1!

dsdnt

atrt

a) Qgggggggg_gzg;33§;gga In ough hacpitnl. Kilt patient.
.32
um
um mum“ u. ”wwma" (ran.
are cnlutoé u.
(19%)
1;
a"
var.
peanut
panamWW.
Ultli nu ”uninprovaa" and 0&amp;1: ‘ 31331: patient Hus antlua
'rcgovnrod” or .Iﬁﬁh taprovid‘. tum highcat pareaataec at
'rotovur-d“ a» ”tank inprovud' 31:13:: (20:) :51 an. tenant
propurtion a: ”Ininyruvvd’ {101) «0:. Stand at aunc.
Lnalyuua within such auntttnaioa uhcutn vurtnbln rouulto.
A‘ an and nunc thsrc an: n tandungy IQ! )Iaar putauntn to ho
Iltcd hctﬁor ‘3‘: yolaanr anal, but ‘kc ratnita tr: l‘a.1|$1t~
was
m.
ma
on
than
n.
may
aimltisaant
awn”.
um
rm‘cd
to
5!
with
Iatupruvlla
oléar
likely
an».
pstinntu
trend,
tut ‘hia did not aahsava a‘sttltlcni tignittaanno.

n m,

an.

mm

a

“‘3'“ :9.“‘ﬂl”..”rhbgo VII
wa-oonhwﬁcumahha

d) btgsnnuila

Fur

u‘atiattnul analytic

$hrnn dinsnontal

l¢h38iphliu1¢, arxostavc dsnurdaro.
and poyzh¢ncnron15 and tﬂrlﬂnllltr ditirdlrt ($351. '11:).
nuns
and
31-11::
ﬁt:
I!
disgn¢at1¢
proyorticnn
It!
It!»
It.

groupcinsu Ina. 544::

�.13.
pcptlnttonn. but it. Ill ’iﬁiﬁlﬁﬂ «or. rcunrdod an invanu
and
and
a 13:30:
Iahtuophrcntc
nttacttvo
1130:4023
tart:
nn-pur a: purchanouroﬁtc or per-duality dilornora.
Intrailltitutlnutl ntalrlta Ibiuid that tt I! tot! l1.
tad r loot. wore rolstad to It‘sntuan; 1‘ III an. at... a:
£h. nacitl tltttrr was rolntca to dsnxnootng null. as 1386
iii? I! it. 30:13! vuradbla¢ war. no ralatod. at tho p31»
Ohllttll var1thlos, it‘snoata val nignitiaantly rtlstnl gt
enth hoiyital te tg1:¢tica 01 trnuitcnt llﬁ durati¢n of
sad
only at IE to diauh‘wxo artlaatiau.
hanpt‘nltuation;
.ﬂuﬂwﬁ Q. .DI.C“M”O“
flhla V111 dbaut hart

U-“OD‘““Om--.ﬁ-“”“~.-

�.15.
n

.

10!

In this courtrtaon It ﬁhroa vutun$nrr paychintriu
houpa‘alt a. hat. dbuorvud tisaatlonat tn‘orinutitntionnl
atttuvuunol I! rattantl 1. ‘ho noctnl vurtlblta a: rtura
at oduca‘ioa and 1.01:1 slant, but not ugu; :- distribution
at cnlstorutu r acalovan¢rnsy ‘nd 1: oath of tin truntnmat
durntaon a: knapst:11uatton. ccluctton o:
vurtlbluu

trdut-c-tl

and

atltrtbutton at 1113.0...

and danuhnrct

ovuluattlua. It. tilt-routs: in ‘rontncnt variable. butt-nu
£ho Lia‘stuttuns nay roc‘l‘ Iron man: flitlrl. including
£ho 30.1.1 aspoo$o highlightod 13 an! tntﬁstl ain‘t-t. 2'
dttinc tho r01: a: sedan! tho‘oro taro olonvly, vb IIICIiotk tho 1n£r‘~$nlttttt1¢nu1 nulparinOIt. Iron into. aﬁulyioa.
ﬁt» :gok a: cnlutltcnt ralaGloashtpu land: dent: n: in tho
v.1. at putlcut nottal tuaiars u‘ priallpil actorntnnnta 1a
£routnal£ vtlhln than. tittin... It via an‘tcipatud that
wi‘hin ouch tusﬁltnttoa. pnﬁlonin at hichur 00.1.1 clays,
turn: r not». ans hat‘ar causation, would to croutud prcrcru
tg‘luXXV by pcrthntb¢V£vrg clnsnttiod as nourotio, tuna:tnr shorter partodl and r:¢¢1v. botﬁ-r danchargo rats-an.
wl‘hxn in. :uli1iut10n, an irrtstlnr unsootnﬁloa bc‘vtta tn.

1;).
(ram.
mun-u «I
wan. no sauna-n.
it. Illa. not. at tin Inuit: $323.51.. var. rotatod tn any

cum

at: at. tacit! alga: Itliilttc;117 rotataa to 3:: trontnomt vnrlubln at otshcr I! or 313. o: a

ﬁrouﬁuout turtnblus

�$3313

3

___,

by
nun-qutuuml
”hunch”.
Manta“

on Sam.

”I - haunt aoluﬂ“

' '- mun O: thuuﬂl
' - Duncan

11“ch suit-nun
mutton . man or
Inﬂuuuuu
I an" - ”can“ sun“."
. Mam”
"

ii‘lﬁ

3;:

-

n. I. “nun-up
in- ti mo.

m
«I»

4»

am...» he mu: am0

u

r:

.05

p&lt; .0).

on W

.001

�.15.
pcccthlc he rclccaccchtpc hchucch ccctcl ccc trcctccnt
vhrachlcc, clcvcn crc chctﬁcttcclly nightttocat.
fhc dirtcrcnccc 1c tho an cud It! dctc ucy hc a»
rctlcchlcc ct thcir pcpclclhdch atttcrcccccu thc rclccicu
at 13c cc d1cchcr;c cvclccttcn, ccd r cccrc tc 41c¢nccic
at an rctlccticcihc htchcr prcpcrticn c: dcprcccivc illccccccp
uhtlc hhc rclcctcc ct cuc cc hrcchucct cclccticn cc urn
rctlccttcs choir highcr prcpcwttcc c: {cc-t pcrcccc clccciw
tic! pcychcncurcclc cud chcrcchcr itccrdcr. rho ctnilcrthtcc
:- I! and Ill much In: rctlcct ctnilcr trcchccut philcccphtcc,
which crc littcrcct rrcn thct ct Illa. ccudtttcac c: clcchivc trcchucht ccd clccttvc dcrctxcn ct hccpitclxcchlch catch
ct ll cud HIE. and th may hc thin tlcllhtlihy thch pcrcttc
tho inhcrccticc ct tho cccicl vcrtchlcc. 1% lane, hcvcvcr.
tho lththcd cccy cud cccd tcr rcpid trcctccch rcculhc ta h
tctlcrc hc dchchctrchc cc 1ctcrcch1cc ct cccicl vcrichlcc
vtch tho trcchhhct prccccccc.
Similarly. thc rclchtcc ct cccihl clccc vcrichlcc hc
trcchhcht varichlcc 1c hhc lcllxccchccd ccd nclltuh ctndicc
Icy rctlcct hhctr dctc cclcchtca, vhtch vac cvcr thc hrccd
rccxc ct c11 ccnuhcatw :cctltctcc cud cll trccthcah portcdc.
within thcsahcttcnc, hcvcvcr, thccc cccthl thctcrc cppccr
lccc «Incl-.111" ct trcchcct ruichlcc. accusing): cvmcvcrcd
by tctrcccrcl cdhtctccrcttvc ct {sunsctcl ccccccthtcc. 1c
hhc ccrltcr Iillctdc lccpthcl chcdacc ( ) thc rclcttcc ct

�~16-

vnrtubloc
trooinant
‘0
thtad
cit-atlas
0: u... r 3019:,
13 u rdlnation of the krona ndnantn‘rativu 1a£1ta¢ua avntlnhlo
defined
broadly
lrtnﬁnout.
var.
tans.
that
a‘
tn pnﬁlnu‘ car.
with cengﬁtc, nzltou :34 paychoﬁhurnpautto undo. annuity
‘vniznhlo. ”III‘SOQ Ir Incpt‘nlinotton an. broadly duttnod
Anni-lion
policy
1
raga-atod.
19:31:
or
to
up
i:
your,
at
was {113151. and thh taught and purntt‘od tun Ianxslaon or
paﬁtuu‘n ‘1‘» a I10. 933;. a: pcylhlatrxa laouraorc.
the proacnt an Isudy than: (out: locial-trantnont'rctn‘tono
con-ﬁr‘o‘ttn
195?
a
parka»:
‘ha
rollocttuc
than
s‘uay.
nit»!
Lu avgilabiliﬁy a! trcaﬁuont :hoiooa. ta popu1t£1on 33¢ a
uniturn us‘cnnton-cl ditl‘lil at heapttcllulttoa. lit.
new
ad-tntn‘rnliﬁh
a
can‘nlyorcsoouslr
thatlsltad
pitta...
with
closer
no
narkud
a
Granting
axillarity
in
clonal:
$10.,
the Mt! nodal. Such administruttvo discus-10:. arc iosu no
prtutcpal dctorntnlltl or tn. Clorﬂlllﬂ or dist-lutton a:
social vurinbloa, n. ltl‘lrl ta tho trantncnt prostlu.
A lacuna aspect at that. I‘udtoo an: tun Icthodoloctoul
problems In 6011.13: tho ‘roatnon‘ Vtrtnbloo. That. last:tltSOan wort toloctod to: that: cantattouni loudnruhtp and
be
vanld
roomrd¢d
£ho
vurtuono
01¢:rly
tha‘
clygctattoa
it.
uglinod. OI: dirttcultzao in arriving at comparable Asia
oouvuattonnl
at
a:
$ht-prdblnn
to
one!
in.
tupcrtant
tit
at.
OOIplrﬁﬁiyi it;$ia£ion. 0330015117 1- £3. ovulustton a:
psychiatric therapiou. rho trnquun‘ nu. at dilahnrco ratings,

�-17-

dtncnolttc .11.... or Iongth at houpisaltnatton an ortturta
or thorlpputic vnluou at conpnrubtltty or nuts-ct: and poppItttona urn Iibaoct £0 can-031v. array pal... tho inuttﬁnctono
puraduxtn
naschnd
adulatutrntivo
patparuu.
tar
clourly
It.
It.
cal uupuro at a :atluru ts anounat for this vurinhlo 1- to be
6511
dbucrvnﬁtoa
‘hc
of
a
in
tutprprctataon
lttcrnl
t:
Iii!
cindy. an. urn hi! it: most highly train! per-canal oondutttnu
troainunt think is applxud for indivicunlly tottaoﬁ,¢ptxan1
portods o: ‘llis it populations with it. 1...‘ propurtion
danunouod 1p nu unfavorabls

pritlll‘it

group (achilophronin)

-

1.
uncultl
(cvorlblo
tracing-t
a:
rot.
th. pOOIOIt. At Illa, 1n contranﬁ, tilt. in: lonat traluod
shtruptacﬁ apply transient. for nu adutntutrativnly llutsnd
patina, ‘0 t papnlattou ‘1‘! a tight! prcportlon dtnuuoacd
Ichisophrpnia. tho proportten or tnvorablo itscharxt rating:
in lixutticnutlr grouper: It 1- prubsblo thnt thun- ohlcrvuu
£303: a. sop rutloc£ thy tharapcusac atticppy 0: photo snap:1n
inﬁtcatodb
ortsorta o: tuprvvo~
attics-loan
tu‘ttul, 3"
~- tad

tho proportion

uonﬁ.

this lack a: alsritv in «tacuautta achcunﬁ¢ and lacunpnrtbiltﬁy or psychiatric trou‘upnt variably. all. landpallc to th. t‘tcnptnd acuparupivc studio: or payohtntria
thorpptca. Pb: asunplo. tho rank at rooont failurns or
biolcgtcal Ioaonticsu to Courtru ubacrvutioan Ill. 1: «that
labor-tartan rip he I: unch a rutloctinn 0: 11:10:03... In

�.18.
popnlnﬁsoul. paynhaatrin orssortu,lggg. an tullaniou it tho
or131ua1 hip-thus... tin vtdnspmoad no. or tank turns :-

”Ichzscphroaiu' or "plynh'aamtoaiu' to unplarc £hn shuns-n
13 pnyubutagtoal or biological toninraa with nouﬁaz ilincsc
has 106 it a Icioaea burdonod by ungattvu rctaign (Iellak),
nont narkod rocuntly 1n tho nontliettng studio: at I tdrll
false: in auhaauphroutn, :3d the tact-pur‘btltty or the
yhyutologtoul -. hohnvtorcl corrcluttnn: scan in tun u0choly1
(Fulton-toau) and sedatiau thr¢lholﬁ tnakt. Esta nor. 3
valzd abourvn‘tou to be ropuriod :rcu on. clinic, dc a. havo'
nothtdi available ‘0 deliriho poputlilonl manqua‘nzy £0
providc ‘ sound nontlrnatlon? w. haltovu hat, and nonoludc
from thugs dbnurvuttcls that incranacd attention unst be
paid to she uathodolaaaaal prnblun: o: alttsityina uuhjocta
hy 'vb:oot&amp;vo“ cratcriu, rather than ﬁns prosoat untied!
whack appear to b: a. hichiy dopoadont a: institutionnl ;ad
otuarvar nttittana. In: the oouiopaychological 339.0%. .2

‘3. thﬂllptltupl§103‘ tltcrtctiou.

�IleI I
can? a nu

at Bil:

WW
1. nnprunaav‘ rouctson
Surciaozntlo Puruonnlitr

1: no:

WM“
1 61-1-

“mm

Payohcncnrostl

2. Auxtuty Roaution
larttnntutia Parlounlaﬁr

Payohnaonrootl

3. larcttsiutia ?urlcan11my

tartan-11::
$

h. lurcatﬂiutlc Par-annlstr.
Alcohcttun chronic
Intintilo PartinIISty

I acuiuputhic
Put-onaltty
Btuturhusoo

S. Pausivn Augrcuuive
P¢rsoun1$ﬁy
Alcoholiun

Suctcpcthic Purcoanllty
Disturhllco

6. Inthn‘iln rarncnnlzty
Schauophrtntu Ronltton

StuttOphronlo vaychoail

,

Suhiﬁl-Aflloﬁ1Vi*2¥pl

frtit
31I£I§bnnio

�TAELE

c

1

5‘

1
of
I: on
g; gaggs‘nl aacahnrgo

8a.:

tin.

Ii

u

,

Illa
ﬂoats: tgguai-ant

Ruusvuroi

luouvavud

Inpmuvod

Bach Inprvv‘d

unrkodly InprQV'I

Untaprovvd

Invrdvnd

lodurntolr Improvul

alllprcvod

81133‘17 Inprovod

Hltnprcvud

couplate Ronanaign
2aprov.d
v‘ahnugcd (u: wits.)

�ans-$3

:33»!
.

i:

on

.,

w

W

M

.

-

V.

ma

w,

,-.M
,

u.

x

n
Ha

‘ a
WE

w

m

V

m

Vino

W4

m

.w

Vacs.

gm

H1

II

”Sup-32a

a

I'_I"II

3.33..

V

mﬁuﬁﬁﬁm

.63.

I;
Eu.

as

PH.

no

in

�EQELE V

:2!

an

kl

173

we
v’-82.8;

39

dtwhx

p¢.061.

’

21

h:

36

36

6h

0

ah

68

a

! principalxr lilies thsrtplio

�me

95

x'.?0.6; “'1” V5.09!

�331.8

quttt‘u

I

an
g!

m

‘

’

Rum“,
rum

n

'1;

«huand
d

1

c ﬁ

Imprond

ﬂux-yam!

99

1

an

1.9

17:

23

6:

15

as

61

10

mc-

x*-29.3; «rub; p«.oat.

�Y

Ilstttntaau

.

V

I

WM).

l

achtgophrtnia

Puyuhonguronia
and
E'
7

ml
m1

male

171

.

85

t"13.8h1 43-h; pﬁoanl.‘

far-onaliﬁy

O;

!'

J££o¢ttvo

33

$2

5

52

26

:92

SL

29

16

�A

Couporioon o: sooioplyoholoaiool Voriobloo and

Poyohlotrlo trootnout 1o Throo Voluntary Hoopitolo

Robort L. Kuhn, Ph.D.', no: Pollock, Ph.D.

lothoniol Siogol, Ph.D.
oud

m ﬂak,

um.

tron tho noportuont of Suporinootol Poyohiotry, Hilloido
Hoopitol, ﬁlo: Oaks, L.I., 5.1.
Aidod, in port, by grout HI-ZOQI of tho lotionol Inotituto
o: Kontol Koolth, 0.8. Publio BooIth Sorvloos ond tho loooou
County Kontol Hoolth Hoard.

tho cooperation of tho ototto of tho Hooooohuootto Montol
Hoolth Contor and tho 0.1. Hoaninlor Houoriol Hoopitol 1o
lrototuily ooknovlodcod.
o Prooont Addrooo: Divioion o: Poyohiotry, Houtottoro noopttol,
I.!. 67, 3.2.
VII: 3/62

�In thair atndy a: tha lav lavas payahiatria patiaat
populatiaa. lailingahaad and Badliah rapariad aignitiaant
raiaiiouahipa batwaan an individuai'a paaitian in tha aohial
aliaa airuatura and tha pravaianaa a: traatad iilaaaa, typaa
at diaguaaad diaardara ind kinda and duration at payahiatria
traatnaat adniaiaiarad ( ). Thay indiaaiad that prapartian~
ataiy aura lava: aiaaa paiiaata in traataant vara aiaaaitiad
aa payahatia whiia uppar alaaa patianta vara naraattan alauaitiad aa naaratia and paraaaality diaordara. ﬁagardiaaa at
diagnaaia, payahatharapy waa anplayad in diaprapartianataly
high dagraaa with iha uppar alaaa patianta, and urgauia
iharapiaa with iavar alaaa aahjaata.
W”
Tha intiuanaa at aaanaaia atatua
tha availability
aau‘gviat
lﬁkaualndad in thaaa atudiaa.
at traating paraanual
fa iaat tha raia at aaeiai taatara in tha traatnant at hoaa finanaagfaui
iadapaudani
at
patiant
patiant'
pitaliaad
M“:
JJ’availabilityat iraataauta;a patiant aarvay vaa undertakaa
at Biliaida laapiial in 1951. In thia haapitai, a variaty
at traatlant nodal, inailding individual payohatharapy and
organic tharapiaa at. availabia to .11 patianta ragardlaaa

3”“

at thair ability to pay.
In that ....!G. aga, adnaatian and piaca at birth var.
aignitiaauiiy aaaaoiatad viih ahaiaa at traatuaai, duratiau
at haapiiaiiaatian, aliniaal diaaharga avaiuatian and

�.2diecneeie ( ). The elinieel teetere were elee releted to
e eeeenre e: etereetypy, the celiternie F snele ( ). Higher
r eeeree eere nere etten round in petiente diegneeed en invelntienel peyeheeie referred for eeuetie therepy end heepi~

telieed fer e eherter peried ( ).i
11..., mﬁﬂﬂ‘iv W”
It eee eenelnded thet the elGIItI-et eeeiel eleee, ege,
education, birthpleee end degree or etegzgggpy en peyohietrie
i:3§::§:7gi
eeeienie
treeteent petterne were not
teetere er
eveilebility er treeteent eleee. One eezgeetien wee thet
eeeiel teetnre influenced dieueeeie end treeteent by etteetin: the verhel end nen-verhel eynpten petterne e: petient
behevier. It wee peeteleted thet eehjeete et lever eoniel
eleeeee, lee-er edneetien end tereicn hirth would eere
frequently eeniteet eyepteee in nen-verbel, eeneery or enter
pettnrne end would expeet phyeieel eedee e: therepy. Upper
eleee eehjeete eenld etiliee verhel neene e: expreeeien,
end eetieipete peyehelegieel teree er treeteent.
A eeeend interpretetien releted
peyehietrie treeteeet
to the phileeephiee end ettitedee at individnel peyehietriete
end heeyitel etet: ettitedee. In inetitntiene where peyehetherepy wee highly velned, upper eleee petiente would he
treeted dieprepertienetely with peyehetherepy. Sieilerly,
dieeherge eveleetiene end deretiee e: heepitelieetien weeld
he etteeted by dittereneee in etet: expeetetiene for individuele of differing eeeiel eleee.
”Sikhs/W!

�toot thio ooooad hypothuio no dooidod to "put to
Hilloido (an) otody ouployinx tho Iona prooodoroo out
l'o

1957

oonoorroatly to oxtoud tho oboorvotiono to two othor institutions, tho 0.}. nounio‘or Honoriol loopitol of fopoko
(HIE) ond tho looooohoootto Hootol ﬂoolth Cantor of Bolton
(ulna). rhooo inotitntiooo not. oolootoo in tho oxpoototioo
that they oorvo potionto o! ditroriag oooiol olooooo and
that ditrorooooo in thin di-oooiou would ho rotlootod in
tho trootnont variation. In thooo hooptolo thoro in o oinia
lority in ottitndo souordo trootooot and oduootiou. Each
in o tooohinc hoopitol with a toll tin. ooporvioory ototr
and ootivo rooooroh doportooot. rho: onphooino poyohoonolytioolly-oriontod porohothoropy but provido othor trottuonto including oonotio thoropioo ond ootivo procro-o o:
nilioo thoropy. Book otrooooo chart-torn trootoont o:
voluntary potionto, dooo not provido oootodiol ooro and
tonde to draw ito potiont populotioo tron oinilor ozo croopo.
tho opooitio tin; of this study voro to dotornino population dittoroaooo botwoou tho throo institution: with roopoot
to oooiol olooo, ago, oduootion too I oooro, nod to roloto
tho-o potioot ohorootoriotioo to tho trootnont voriooloo or
typo or trootnoot, duration or hoopitolilotiou, diagnooio
and dioohorxo ovoluotioo.

�Uh.
HEIIOD

valaatary, adult pattanaa 1a validaaaa in thaaa
taattauttaaa an a titan data in January 1959 wara aaad£ad.
whsla 8!! and El had valaatary paataata only, a aaall nuabar
a: thaaa at zinc vara aaatsaad by aha eaarta tar payahiatrta
avalaaataa, at wara aanbara at a abrania aahtaaphraaio ataaa
hospital group tranatarrad for a apaattia raaaarah proJaat.
Thaaa patlanaa vara aaa}gaa§mgaan tho atudy baaauaa at that:
aaa-valaaﬁary atataa. fha laud: popu1;‘1.§“;;hai§£;§”;g:§i3
tag-“ice at m and 95 at me. nub
van
W~_MM' W._~.»M~_~-w
gtvan tha calitarnia I aaala ( ) an aha daaigaatad aaaa.
is 0!“ ”Univ;
MM
Eightaaa aoutha later tha-paﬁtaata' raaar ‘Awara aaaiyaad.
to. MMML
and
tho
aha
variaua
aaatal
taatara
at
payahtatria
atady.
)far
a£3~3:::::2:;tton
tar
at aaazal alaaa, tho Ballingahaad
2-taatar tad-x was aaad ( ,). Tho atady inaladad aaaatnaaiaa
at tha ralatiana of tha aacial ta tha payahiatrta variablaa
within aaah inaattatian, as wall aa batwaaa inattantiana.
‘rhaaa aaaparlaana provad difficult baaauaa at airfaranaaa in
tha dattataian of tha paychiatrta variahlaa, aha variablaa
L11

mung";

pl;;t

cut-at: aritaria could not ha
dataraiuad, and varying dagraaa at ataatag data. Far axaapla,
ta aaapara inatitutiana in ralatiaa to laacth a! haapital

raucad widaly and camparahla

atay. variaaa nag-or: pariada vara ariad but aana allowad
rat aaaparahla diatributtaaa. At Hyﬁ, ana quartar a: an.
pattaata raaaiaad ravar thaa aavan aaatha. aad awa-ahlrda
a

�.5.
Into tuna twclvo acuthu. At ulna, in contract, 701 at .11
pation‘t rcnntnod 1... than IOVOI noaths. tad onzy 61 not.
than 3201?. angina. In actor-intng 0.01:1 .1... that. van
tarnrnnttou availnbll for 292 of 371 patiouta. Unclaucitxablo
Ctlll accurrtd whoro tn. educ‘tion or the unaband or a honouwtto If the tathnr or a liner VII nut rouordod.
Loonrdinu, 1n $ho nutty... a: paychiatrio vnrinblot
inphllll V111 bu plaacd on tho dittcrcncoo botvoou tuititu‘lonn,
with c1t:txon or rolovnnt tnttu-inatltnttonal rolntaonnhtpa.

�Katharina“! “no.“
what! "parts.“
tn:
hatun
I
tnutuuou,
“at”
11
and
“icon
for
of
tho
“that
hospital
crust“,
"not”.

1.
4*“

2y“

1,:

,7)

§

)3

§

Pg
«
§

3

studying
in
brieﬂy.
“attend
ﬂavour,
{LR $ Q
1:”er
77W
', 0”]
M
and
author Guplrlbli d».
44W
stunting
inﬂation
3:.
ﬁg
.W'
3'.
M”
batvua
tho
undo
1at
q
dirt-rue”
luuumm.
any
m\
an
3N
M
”1:1” (Md “on. ﬂu hospital. org-nuts.» u a dour-tun at twat-x § Q1: 9.
3*
”3%:
both
sh.
pr-Obltl.
03mph,
)W
tumultuous
hr
no“
Q‘s
an
u
‘
Mﬂg
3
3g
an
do“ not.
7“ MM 1mm and am In" in: lupin]. nun, while
(ft; Q
3‘
mfg?” At me the trotting phynuua u: can for a pttuu u a ‘E Q“k
and
tho
as
1n
é
day
the
utter-nu
hospital,
W‘ﬁjw Min-pun“,
x
i
to
In
tool
1%
In
;.1. 1,,
no):
a
auburn
«a
in.
“tuna.
cunts.
w
k“
g
M";
knowing
tho
at
hoopla!
the
«run“to,
patient in:
”ﬁle/:4 ,
a
WV 15%”,
11111
ha
hi:
tar
patint'u
to
ruponltblo
«to;
um
can
%
1;.
'bj’whuuﬁ
up»)
gt an, “sour” nun urination or “at puunA” MW
auto:relation“?W M” Jr
1M
Vb 5
0:
the
Authcr
$4,
III
pubic:
51/”
“than
prune.
running m. {Lu
u}
NM
5”” w”
M.
use
tbs
.2
_..,
011““).
an.
"nun“.
‘y prurun, “tuna:
W”
w
g‘éﬂm
w
tho
at
approximately
pan-nu
“any para."
u
«may,
W
{
to:111
had
and
bun
chronically
hospitals!“
mo var.
“wwizof rb
Mara
would
not
normally
1:
luv.
bun
Sun
group
I
yuan.
any
ﬁg
Wu;
MW"
thin nuptial bit they had bun trmtornd tron author

m

O
|

9'

1,.

.

|.

“0:

ax-

.

in

8
v

8

”L

e

,

A

_

.

Mk

M

‘

3

‘35

’

3

\
g

,

.

x

‘

W”

,5

l

i

'

W"

.

l

at.“ human“ for a ”001.1 ““1.
Thu, tho vary not." no In" int-tutu

/

in studying

,4"ch

‘

�~80

diagnssol unpluynd tho unltipIo avnl‘ativu d.ta Ichuuo
rootuaondod by tin Anortcna Psychiatric LIIOOIQ‘itl will.
both an and nuns rollovod Iaiﬁary nyuﬁunl. 8.7.!!! uxanploo
a: dllﬂlllll tram I)! are liatod 1n Idblo I, with on: on;goutod oonvoruioaa into ottngoricn coaparablo so the cthor
two institutiona. {hone aonvorlioul provide, horcvcr, an
unavaidnblc neuron of dfstartaon. (31-11nr ebonrvntinln havban rap-rut! by Pun-nut and his uuetntoj ( ) who
indicts. th.t diagnoous riﬁhin the can. tantikutiou arc die
valuarnblo to individual ditturoncoc anon; anguinnr-J
-“--I‘-----QTtblu I
c) Dilahsr 0 anti 3 at In rovcm¢n%: Ratings at inpravc:ont varind in (grant and detail. the dischargo rating It
KPH In: triparti‘o with a liptruto cvalustion for
social,

attractorcloliual

and cyndrouo Chlnloto

an and Kane had

glob-1 ratings in which it was dirtiault to .0303: the con—
trtbution or cash factor at th: urn tyntan (rubl- II). For
this Itudy the urn urndrono rating VII compared to tho glqbll
ratings of an and mane.

T‘bla
2. Socioglzeholoitcal Variable.

II

�-9“

a) Socitl Gina-z that. val I narkod dittoronoc in tho
lociil ulna: oonpouition of tho thro- iuttitttions (Table 111).
3%
an
BEE
01:00;
tho
produninaltly
population
uppar
In.
it
niddia olaun; tad at axle. pradcninaatly lava: Ola-u.
b) 5.3: Thor. turn as dittaruncun in In. dilirihutiou
in the institutional popuiitiano.
0) Education: Tho populitionl dirtorod in cduantioual
1%
HIE
with
having nor. yoirl or adieupaticatt
utttinncni,
tion than that. it HERO. While kl p02 aunt of tho pttiontl
HERO ttilod to cosploto high annual, only 32 par cent at
it
KPH
UK and 23 par cont
it did ant ‘raduntc.
d) F Sacra: Dittoruncon in the diuiribuiion of scar-I
on tho Gilitornia r 80.1. not. obsorvod. ritth~ono par coat
or urn paticntl had P score: below 30, cad only eight var cent
with IBOrCI or 50 or abuvo -- the higher P acorns being O0..cintod with high-r dugrtul o: sturuotypy. In contrast, at
3336 tittty per cont not. Euler 30 on the F 30.1., and tort Knigz;::;pnr—ttnt
$0
two per scat and IBOIII at
or nova. it
bb¢”»130 chad eﬁnuau~ P&amp;c&amp;¢r véu&lt;_z
or the pntiuntl hid F 3002.: ia—ihn—nidd%¢arcntu-huﬁwuuu—3O

'0'”?ch

My

Sowua «Jan, 50m
0

3. Pozohiatric Variablu:

Intrgoinutitutionnl «satirinonl urn connoiidatod in
Tabla IV, wail. iuicr-inutituiional ounparinont are proacntad
iadividquly in tack auction. In tibia IV, nirhu uni psychotherapi.a act. conhiuod, parlitting p «cairn-t or countie ind

�.11.

at an and rune. 3.3.310 two‘s-ant uni uolootna for pattea‘u
clan-itlcd an achisaphroain and atfcotivo disorder not.
titan than than. Illlﬂid an paychonuurmszo u$ Illh hoapitll.
At HFH, pattou‘a rocolvtll unantio troaiannt (prodcninautly
than. 01.8.06 an nthiaoyhrania) rocnlvod dinohsrso ratingot uninprevnd nor. ofton thus putiuata roooivina psychathcrapy
alone.
b) Duration of Boagitaliuttiona 23. turn. instituticua
agitated with roapott t0 ptticnt'o longth of ctny (Tabla VI).
MPH patients VII. haupitnliscd
leascls, with 65$ of pat1¢atl
runtiniag t0: twelvo lanth- or torn. cenpatua ‘0 31 par cont 0:

patioutl and 0:1: 5 par coat a: that. it nuns. rho
3.4.1 ttay .1 it. i3 group was hottocn IIVOI and «lurch
nonthn Hull. twenthirén of tho XHHC patioata wort diachuracd
within six 393th: at hoapttnlisatton. 3031.1 «1::- and
F acorn worn 30‘ rnlutod té dira‘ion at any institutian.
or tea psyghiatrio variabloa, only diazuoaia 00‘1d b. taint-d -

in.

HE

as tho». diagnonod a. achinaphron1n war. hospttnlaund to:
longer porlodn It sunk inutttution. At avury at. 10701, that.
at RFE rouninaé $0.30: th¢a It 33 or Mlle. Ind-oi, tho in‘cr-

institutionul ditturonotl rat. to grant ‘hat 3 pttiont in
th- oldut go pup nu It" 11h): up In lac-punts“ :cr
tvlov. tenths cw not. at KPH ‘htl war. pntioats in tho
yonncont as. graup at HXKO.
Within

ill‘iilt10nl..‘IO

nudmodnoatton As xv: and an

�-12u

honpttnltnatiaa ~- youaxnr lid 10!:
oducatod putt-at! rinutntng for tho lingolt period

worn roln‘od to lunght of

Q-.-“-O-QC“-- .O-”--.
rabzo V1 abuut her.

-U.---'...--’--Q-ﬁ--.~
a) Diuoharlc Evaluation: In cash helpitnl, ants patiouta
are ovnluatnd ut th. time o: disaharto :&amp; "taprovcd" (Tabl. VII).
9: pattnntl worn
a IIQEI. p¢t1¢nt who call-d

At KPH, hoV¢vnr, u high-r porountaun (19$)

rntud a: ”unimprovcd” and «317
”gooovorad" or ”much improvad”. Tho hiahu:£ purncntago or
”roeovorod" or ”such 13336706" r;:1nsa (28$) :ud tha lowcat
NHEC.
(10%)
"unimprvved”
{tuna
a:
ct
war.
proportian
Analya¢a within «ash institution Chalid Ttriiblﬂ roanltc.
At an tad H336 thorn was t tondonay far 9140: puticuta to ho
ratcd hatter than youaanr onus, but uh. results arc ut:ttlt1¢33.
Aﬁ
H33
thorn wan II OppOlt$O
anly
at
aixnirieant
all?
trund, with older pationta nor. ltkoly to ho rctcd nutupruvod;
but this 616 net aahiove ntatiuticaI signiftclnao.
-ﬂ‘----‘-ﬁ-“ﬂﬂﬂ’.9351: VII

-O.--’.-‘-.ﬁ-¢--.
d) Diauneais: Fer neltiutiaal annlyulu thrco diltnﬁi‘lt
groupfingc were mudo: achisophrouit, tffottivo aiaordcru.
disardora (Tublt VIII).
Th. alcgnontie propertians «or. similar for tho an tad Hana

und puychoneurcsin anﬁ pnr¢¢aa11ty

�.13.
purulntaonu, but it. It! patluuta wort tiﬂlrdol s. h:v1:¢
tow-r atttattvo ate oohasophrcnto 1100:4013 and n.13rxcr
author a: plyohcnonrotic or port's-11:; disordatl.
Intrainatitutianal nnulylis abound that at RH both as.
tad F 000:. not. rclatcd to ditcntats; &amp;% HER use alone at
thu nociul factorx uni ralstad to diaguoais; while at EMHG
hﬁﬁﬁ 0f ﬁle social varigbloa were so related. 0f ha payohzattiu variables, diagnoatl wan significantly rulnhad at
Ollh hospital to solootion or tdnatnant aha auratian of
and(§ging:iélta
diucharge ev‘luttien.
haspitalinttioag

"'----’“-”-ﬂ”. u-~u~q~a25310 VIII about barn
u---~-‘n---—-h-~n”ca—umu—Mﬂn

�~1hDISCUSSION

In this comparison of throo voluntary psychiatric
hospitals as havo obsorvod significant intorinstitntional
dirtoroncos of pationts in tho social varioblos of yoars
o: oducaticn and social class, but not ago; in distribution
or California F Scalo scoros; and in oach of tho troatnont
variablos -- duration of hospitalisation, soloction of
troatnonts and distribution of diagncsos and dischargo
ovaluatinns. pTho littoroncos in troatnont variablos botwoon
tho institutions nay rosnlt from many factors, including
tho social aspocts highlighted in our initial studios. To
,.__ Ar
7-“,
dotino tho rols of social factors noro cloarly, no nndortook tho intra-institttional comparisons. Fron thoso analysos,
tho lack of oonsistont rolationships londs doubt as to tho
rclo o: pationt social factors as principal dotorninants in
troatnont within thsso sottinss. It was anticipatod that
within oach institution, pationts or highor social class,
lowor F sccro and hottor oducaticn, would ho trootod proton-4
ontially by psychothorapy, classitiod as nourotic, romain
for shortor poriods and roscivo bottor disshargo ratings.
Within tho institution, an irro ular association botwoon tho
(Tablo:;§;).
variablos was obsorvod
Within ono institution,
tho HHHC, ncns of tho social variablos woro rolatod to any
...--

v

troatnont variablo; nor was social class statistically ro~
latod to any troatnont variablo at sithor KB or MFR. Of a

�-15-

’51,

&gt;

possible h8 relationships between social and treatment
variables, eleven are statistically significant.
The differences in the HE and NPR data nay be at
reflection of their popnlaltion differences: the relation
of age to discharge evaluation, and Fiscore to diagnosis
at hH reflectingthe higher proportion of depressive illnesses;
while the relation of age to treatment selection at MIR
reflecting their higher proportion of young persons classified psychoneurosis and character disorder. The similarities,
in HR and HFH uata may reflect similar treatment philosophies,
which are different from that at MHHC. Conditions of elective treatment and elective duration of hospitalisation exist
at HE and MPH, and it may be this flexibility that pernits
the interaction of the social variables. it HHHC, however,
the limited stay and need for rapid treatment results in a
failure to denonstrate an interaction of social variables
with the treatment processes.
Similarly, the relation of social class variables to
treatnent variables in the Hollingshead and Rellioh studies
may reflect their data selection, which was over the broad
range of all community facilities and all treatment periods.
Within institutions, however, these social factors appear
less determining of treatment rariahles, seemingly overpowered
by intramural edninistrative or financial necessities. In
the earlier Hillside Hospital studies ( ) the relation of

�.16.
svoru, an: cducataul tn tin ‘routnnu‘ Vtrtttloc
in t valuation a: ﬁt. brand adntala‘ruﬁtvo latitudes tvntlnhlo
£011.04
broadly
ltoutnon‘o
not.
tans.
tn plttcnt 0.20 t‘ that
with nonattu, natto‘ cad puythoﬁlnrupuut1n Ind-I aquaixy
i'ISXIUIGo Duro§aou at hingt‘ultsattou was tread}: tuttnod
gs up ‘u 1 1I¢r, If longs: at rotunl$nd. hints-1's p.131:
tun
.1
and
udnislttu
and
bath
IOIIk$
par-titan
(Icntblo
II.
dtnordorn.
at
var'hlasrto
vtth
runs.
'1‘.
I
pattian
f01§$$OI~
socxnlutronincn£
(out:
In
titan
In: prtnott I‘l‘!
constructxon
a
1951
rotlac£1nl
parity.
Itndr.
aha»: its: than tvusluhtlitr a: urinal-at ch¢1¢¢l. in pavulnttun and a
intturu cu‘auliou at d§ru610| at hocrtttitlutxol. this
with
nan
:dn:nlttracultauporaacauslr
tuttxiutcd
:
prion-I.
itﬁt
clout:
marina
a
Itntlnraty
070.11.:
at
tics. is nio-zlr
adutaautruﬁivo
daucasaioua
as
Buck
III!
Iodci.
8!!
It.
tn.
it.
dinuolutltn
at
or
Itﬁcrnxnnnta
thoracic.
tr
yrtnzcvll
0061.1 Vilil‘ltig ca titttri 1: tin trolmnont prcacal.
A loalnd tlpoot c: that. Ituiica 3:3 tin nathodcloctonl
prdﬁloun In dottnln; tun traits-at vurtﬁbioa. Thai. tact:ﬁuﬁaous var. Iclootoa it! ‘hoir causatisngl ltuanrahty and
‘ho capacﬁa‘ton that tbs rooardul variable! wouId ho altar}:
dofiutd. OI: dirttauiticc in Ittlvtts as Odlibrtilirdtil
$h¢
cauvcatlosal'uno a:
anon
at
‘0
sh.
gratin:
.r. tap-rtaut
cuuparntagu o‘ttintlnu. alpuntuIXI 1: ﬁt. ovuluu£1oa a:
purch3n%rlc thornpxnu. it: truancnt II. It diachnzao ratings.

.3 ago.

D

�-17ae
or
criteria
hoapiteliaation
length
diaguoetio cleaner/or
of therapeutic valnee or oouparability or aubjeeta and populationa are subject to oxeeeoive error unless the inatitutione
The
paredoxipa+torna.
adninietrativo
notched
for
are clearly
'7
be
to
ie
oal nature of a failure to aooouht
aeon in a literal interpretation of the observation or this
HFH
conducting
boo
personnel
The
highly
the
traini
loot
etudy.
treatment which ie applied for individually defined,eptina1
periods or tine; in populatione with the least proportion
diagnoeod in an unfavorable prognoa io group (aohiaophronia) ie
roenlte
treatment
and
the
proportion
yet,
-o5\£avorabla
the poorest. At HMKG, in contrast, where the laaet trained
therapioot apply trootnente for an adniniotrativaly limited
period, to a population with a higher proportion diagnosed
eohioophrenia, the proportion of favorable discharge ratings
in eignifioantly greater! It is probable that thoaa observationo do not reflect tho therapeutic ottioaoy or theoo inotitutiona, but indieataﬂi dittoronoee in criteria of improve-

for@

Iont.
Thie laok of

clarity in diagnostic

aohomata and incom-

lendo
a1ae
variables
treatnont
e:
payohiatrio
peribility
pauae to the attempted comparative etudioa of psychiatric
t ranioe. For example, tho raeh of roeont failure: 0!
made
confirm
other
in
to
aoientiate
‘/h(c£jﬁau!§iolozioal
obaorvettfno
laboratories may be as each a reflection of dittoronooa in

�-18..

fallooioo in tho
on
such
torus
of
The
use
widospzood
hypothoaoo.
original
“oohioophronio” or "poyohononrooio" to oxploro tho chongoo
in poyohologiool or biological rooturos with nontol illnooo
hos lod to o ooionoo burdonod by negotivo rooulta (Bollok),
noat marked roosntly in the conflicting studios of o serum
factor in schizophronio, and tho inconporobility of the
tho
nooholyl
in
soon
oorrolotions
hohovioral
physiological -(Funkonstoin) and sodation throohold tasks. Even were a
havo'
do
wo
from
ono
be
clinic,
roportod
valid oblorvotion to
nothodo available to doooribo populations odoquately to
ooncludo
Ho
and
holiovo
sound
confirmation?
not,
a
provide
from thaso obaorvotiona that increased ottontion nuot ho
paid to hho nothodologiool problono of olooolfying aubjooto
mothodo
tho
than
presont
rathor
"ohjootlvo"
by
criteria,
which oppoor to bo so highly dopondont on institutional and
ohoorvor ottitndoo, and tho oooiopayohologiool oopooto of
tho therapist-pationt intoraotion.

populations, poyohiotrio oritorio, 323.

Uﬁﬁ})*l

1"

t

no

�”ﬂu“
Wing

mun.

nupwum: 1V.

Beneﬁt.»

Mun“. rmuw

AnzacQV

mm“

3.

magnum: Puumu‘y

rum-nut.
running mu

h.

l'mmuty
mus-u:
nub-1m em.

f 8001me

Imus)... Formula”

S.

6.

I'm“.
Farm

“mun

in

tau-nu rwmuw
Batu”

nun-pm.
Baum-ulna" W

-

1’me
“than”

Winn
rumba“

Pmbmuw

annual-n1. Ply-haul

�z§gLs g;

W
W

Ithovod

Inst Inprovud
Untnvrnvud

coupluia nonalciao
Ihwruvud

Btuhtngad (or aura.)

�am

1

M9

m.
m

“mu
on mm

'

i

‘

h).

sa

5

want“ In"..

cm

W

33

3:

mm“ an m

�am
um:

0)

U)

a

g

a:

g

.

H

auton,ann

.

.m.m

So.

E?

So.

0&amp;5»

an

a

llllll'llglllllllll
in
CO

E3

nonansao&gt;m

a“.

o

H‘ad

.m.m

Mina-«n

can»

an

m
“no
no.

3E

Hand

pm

a

.

an

n
8.

—:o«a~uwnu¢«.uom

and.
guaoﬂanncm

.8.
we

ncvd.lomcuhnaH

nodunuvm

«uncanny

.

am

«a

So.“

ma

mo.

«nonvooua

M.
no.

mm

.

nauaeadcm

3.

mu

.

.

«6

nuddo

“;o«anu«n¢aumuom

mouoauﬁahm

aoaaanuun

Queen

n«uo:uu«n

ouudaunun
newcauun

“Canon

a:

h

�m1

.

u“

m

�‘

*

M1” .4

m

H

m

.

a:

It
3?
,

67

Innsh

OM: $.00),

'

13

$5

a

’1

an

s

�ms
X"2’a3i

‘

as

«mush:

mum.

u

a:

10

�Inattﬁuttau

I

schlnophr-ntt

rayuhtuanrosiu
it};

m

n
me

‘

171

-

as

x'-8)~3h1 ﬁrth; p¢.60m.

Pursuant:

and

8 .1. ..
1*

_

5’

5’

53

35

51;

V

art-1‘11.

.99

s

&gt;

22

1‘

�ms]:
Mutts-ant

awn-«um: human
on

stun

m" haunt
01'
lap-11.13““!!9mm
.
ant-cum

-

"

-

W1-

mum xumm
at
man
mm
"ﬁnalising
"

..

~

1

8m mud»
"
.

n:

-

W

5.10.“..-

uts-«mug
W ti m.

n-

w

m
u
m

E
‘0'

M

0"
'3'

m

a

a

a

00

IWmﬁ tar man a...
a

94.

.05

H

vs:

.01

�IAﬂLE

G0

vnasxox 0!

333313033 BISCRARGﬂ BIAGEEﬂES
1-

n¢prota1v¢ raaatinn

ﬂarciiatatic Portannlity

2. Anxioﬁy Rotation

6.

I

IﬁCﬁARGE E AﬂBBSEB

GEIIRSL CL‘ﬁﬁIFICAT

.

?nyohanaaraa15

narcissistic Forv¢aa11ty

Plyahounurccﬁw

Hareienistzc rattannlity

Faruuaultty fruit Diuﬁurbcuc.

Strainalutia rtrlantlity
Alcahaltsn 0hrnu1¢
Infantile Pattonalihr;

Sﬂﬂiﬁﬁn$h1¢

Paaaiva Aggrnaaivc
Parsonllity
Aleeholian

ﬂociopnzh1¢ Parawnnlity

.

Infantila Pernanality

schisephrenio ﬁnaniion
s¢h$ao~1££¢ut1vo typo

Parsannlity
Disturhiuua

Diuturbanca

schizophrenia Payabalin

�IABLE

‘Gnﬂraattlvz
8311308 0? OLIRIGAL ﬁDRBITIﬁﬂ
oa-

Rauniugor
39¢IAL ADJEEIEEYT

7

it

QIKB

3 3a

Killeida

ﬁﬂﬁﬁ

Raaavnrﬁé

atauvartd

Inprnvad

narxodly Inpravud

Improvwﬁ

Rumh

ﬁninpravwﬁ

Imyruvnd

nodnrntuly Inpruvul

ﬂainprovod

slightly Inpretnﬂ

‘~

stancruax

Imarnvad

Uniaproved
agggaena.
¢auwlnﬁn Rtmianinu

:upmuvsa

ﬂuthuaaud (yr werua)

Uninprovid

�Iutnrinatitutiuuul ntfturauea in Solaatiuu at
Iggltmnng

.

-

.wt_ _m1e
.

w.

m

21

h:

:5

I!

33

6h

6

mm

as

53

a

x2 «52.3

a:

”guru

9

.1,

�taggg

Inﬁorinstatution’l Ditrcrnneil
(5 o!

1n

itiliilti

Duratiuu of not

thjuatu)
month: in gougital

natitutian

x?

7*11

1? 0

aka

22

13

65

”K

27

h?

31

unac

6?

2?

5

:90.6

a: -k

n

�taggg

Intarinatttutional Birrnrcnuau in

Dinahargu Ditgnaoin

Dingnaatte ﬁatcgarius (Par agnt)

Iantitutlou

ﬂ

at;

me

:3 '23.8h

a:

sh

ﬁ { t 001

Payahoncnroaia
aha Purtunuiity
Disardvr

Atrsuttru

b3

52

s

952
‘

an

schitophronis

171:
85

V

‘

52

as

22

Sh

29

16

�ﬁtgﬁﬁ

Inttrinotiﬁntiennl Ditruranuts

X

1n

niachar a Evaluattan

niacharga Evaluatiau {?ar cunt)

Institution

W

RIB

ﬁﬂﬂﬁ

x2 «29.3

df 'h
p,§.001

linororeé,

Inpravgd

Buinpruvod

1

80

19

:3

62

15

nnd

Each 1 srgvod

�.

I.

.

,2

'

‘1‘

’

,

.

'

‘

..

'

‘

‘

v

I

6)
z

'u

m
1&amp;1

tum-au&lt;

2"

‘

�WW“
m m,

rum.
tuna,
m
my» my.

Int-m 1.. mm, mm»,

“I

3.9.

mmwwww

maxim,

“My
m,
hM;WMﬂ~mdﬁ-meam
mammals-nun;
m,
mmmmmmam.
lulu .10

mwammamwmmam
ume.r.wmwmumw
am.» am Palm
mm,
W
‘w

W
T
01’

n.’

:

4‘bv

at

1.2.

�MWWMuM“WMW¢(Mm

mmmﬂ)mmmnmmmm

nmmammmmmmmm,
wmaummnmmmmumm
umw,mwwmnummm
“Mama-mm“). ummmam
mnmwxmwm wthatwm‘w

Wmmwwmmu

ammmum. hmmmmmwortm
mummmwwmumwuw.

hmmswdmnnmmmmzmmm*

«.me

mwmm mu

�“w-

'ml‘tvﬂivamu

«mtmummmtmwm

mawwm‘mmmmm
I.
“mummumummum.

mmwuumummwmmu

umumwmummmm,w'
¢J.rwmmmwm.u'mmm
mummmnummmmm
mmW-umummmammcm
nmwmummmmum
mm
smwummmwmmm. mu.

mmmuunwmmmumw

mmmwwm
m,mmmmmumwn~mm

.am‘m.

”mmmammm “.mummm

mmummmmuammumm,
m,mm3m,mummmwmruuu

’ummmuwaw,mamm

mtmmmum-m. mama-rum

�mmmmmummmmm
(an
ummmmmmamm.
mamm,mwmmmmm.
mm~Wmemmalm,mu

::*:W~*”M1m*~”
“WW

MWWW:WWW,W3W
«mmm‘umwm madam-Worm
,I.

W W,um.mmummmm

�mam-.nmmmmmumm.

wmmmumuwum,
t.)

W

;_

:' 'm

”A

a

m “1% M

W

mmwummt
ammmmmmum
.

.

«mumu‘m mum-«mm

maﬁa-Wum‘ mmmumm
mm,mmmmmmumm
«WWWWMxm-uuwmm

Wuamuwmmmm,
maummmmumutm
mmmummmwmm'mu
‘

E§~

�lvmmm.—v m- n.

5)

mm mmmmmmmmmm

ummmmwmm
mmmmmmmmmmw.
meta-am.

mmammwmmumuvm
ww_mmwmwutnam
mmmﬂm. MWWummm
«um.
nun-mm
mm'mumowmnmum.

uwmnmmmmuumuwlmmm.
mummuaamw. mamumum
mummammlmmmwumammmmt
ummmmwamdmmwmmmmm

mmmwmrmmmmm
«mmmummrmmm.
(1mm.

WI!

mmammamm,m,m

�,

mwrm—W“

W"

mmrsuummmmmumum
gammy.

W:

Mm‘mﬂﬂmuthmiu
maximammmmm. mwmmm
I»)

Wm'mumam;nmunmm

Mgumwummum,mwm.
a: mumummummmuw
s)

m:
m,uummnwmmmmmormm
mum-m
umammmum
ummmnmmmwww,maﬂmm
mmmmmuW-mmm

a)

'

nummammnwmmm.(ma: (1)9393
.
”gm: awdmnmumm
mma‘mWIMMW. mini-muse:
mmmr'mwnatwmprmuu
masoummmmrmcnummmnmm‘
“tn-“aw hm,anpx-mtd
wmmmrmwwmnmm-Mmum
mm”!
m,m&gt;mwmmmmmuenu
mmumm,uwnu¢mmmmmum
1

mummmmmrm. WWW“

'msmmmwummormmm

�mwmmwmumm
mammal WQMMiWMWM“

wmmmmmmmmum
m, ma—mwwmmnmmmmm‘
mummmuu‘mmmmwu
mmmm,mwmm.
mmmwmm,mmwm“

mummm-Wmm,mmnmmw
ummgmmmaomwwm.
'ummumuw, mm,murm

mwmuwmm(mwm
rmmwwmﬁmmmxrm

«mummnw,uapnwmp
WWW
hummus.anme
Wit:Mwumwmmmamum
MM?
Mawuﬁamﬁ
#mée
twat HS?

MMWWWQ
WWQM

Wﬁﬂﬂﬂ

9W“.

�MI
‘

.

o‘lo'u

mammmmummammm

vamwmu-Wnamhuwum

WW,‘WM1§WIIW{WUMMW
www.mm-ammmmmmwm;m.
W?

m
mummammmm
mummmmmmmmmmm

mum

y‘

ammmmmummmmsm. mm
mwmmmmmm,mmwmmuw

mmmmewmuw,ummm

�WW

#

mustmwmumunutmormnw.
mmnzaurwmuumumummuua,
“snowman-Man. mmmumnmutum
Wqummxmot-ounmuumuuu
o:
than
'wmm.m
Willi-Ind
mam,
um mum
m
toners,
It
mthmnhtmumutmlmttmm
M

m,mmmmamxuutmuhrzmmu
the
of
exam
mid.
new
swam M, mm
mswhmnmmwmsm'smm,emm,
mmm‘m,um,m.,mwwmmu,mm
tnmwmmmumumummmo:
ﬂu mam mm tom of W new new.

th;

13

.mwumanmummmumrmmth-thum‘mmmmmmm
“Wummmmnmmmuuutm

mew,mmmmmwwmmu

unmummmmwmmmtua
wuawmumuummmmmmmw
If
utmmm-mumnmmutwmmmr.

mwmmuummmummmm
mam,mmmmwmtma
mm.

WQMtMW,h-mttmmmmmm

�gm.

anmuquw.
Mmumwntmmmwm
nm,umm,mnmmmﬁmmuum.
um,uuuu

MMWMtwnmmm,dmahusm

deMW‘Iﬁ-Wamum
m,mmmmm~mm«m
mnmummtm Mmmumu

mmmmmnnmmmmmm,n
mmnw.m¢mmmmumm. hwmw

tin-mmmmmmmmmuwm
gamma
mmmwmmm

mmmumwa
mummw
mmm,uuwmmtmmummm ma

“stumwmmm'wammnmmw
ammuuxmmaw'm‘ammmmw

WWMH‘WW,‘WWWWK

�”V

1

“.17..

—-m_

—

mmmmummmmum-

-Wamwwmmm gunman

-w—rv-v-rvv

a.

7—WWVVWWW_W—.__.

ummnmmmm ”.mumww,‘

mmwwwwuwmm

7m

"—

WWW—v

N

.

0w

_

“A

.W

..,_,.mw_.—....,.r,.,.-

ww-v.

”u'mm*w
“Mwumw
(M‘m‘
m
W‘i
”thawum W
mmmnmmwm,mwwmmm

mmamnmmmammm

mmmmmmummmw
«mnwammmm,m~wmm
awmmm,m,mmum
“at
mmm,mmmmmumm

J

t;

"

�",wwww

w

.7"-

wry—«W...

..”___,__,

»

«-

.w‘

3...;

Amwmmmnmmwm,

umamwmmmmnmm

www‘wvwa

WW

«p—w‘wmmvw—WW

mmammm,mmmum

WWW-w

”.7“

~
.—

WW.

�TABLE

I
-

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

r

.

.m.

._...-

in...

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

1. Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

&amp;

reaction
Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait

2. Anxiety

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism Chronic
Infantile Personality
Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Disturbance

'

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance
Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction
Schizo-Affectige Type

~

"

Schizophrenic Psychosis

*4

.

r

.,

.

'

~

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge
MENNINGER HOSPITAL

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

'

Social

Ad

ustment

Recovered
‘1’

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Improved

Much

Unimproved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly Improved

Character Structure

ﬁproved

Markedly Improved

Improved
Unimproved

Unimproved

Szgdrome'

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged

(or worse)

�TABLE

III

InterhosEital Comparisons for
Sociogsychological Variables

Hillside Massachusetts

Menninger

Hospital Mental Health

Hospital

Center

7%

20

Social

’=121.S

df=8
p&lt;. 001

3h

Class

3b
5

1970

:

.

‘

_

-

Age

58

_

_

S2

Y3=3o 9

dfuh

p- n.s.

12—15X2'9
&lt;12

Years of

Education

16

”

32%

df-h

+

p&lt;.

51%

F

7

OS

X"3
2
df-h9

‘

WWW

Score

hl

SO

p&lt;. 001

8

-‘

-

--‘”

~

~

-~ .. x “hm-ave
-

x-r'

row-'t-t'r.

«ma-Iv: «cr-r\+:w.-:.wv-'--vvwz- ~‘rwrwg

,..\IQ‘W~("" w

my

3‘"5‘WM»WMP

�TABLE IV

Intel-hospital Differences in Treatment Variables
Heminger
Hospital

Psychotherapy
Treatment

Duration of

Hospitalization

Sanatic

-(-19—
21%

Hillside

Hospital

-ﬂl)-

Husachnsetts

Mental Health

Center

—(-D

36%

h3

6h

36

--

7-11 months

27

11 months

Discharge

Evaluatim

Improved
Improved

80

62

Unimproved

19

15

Affective Psychosis
Diagnosis

28%

Psycheneurosis and
Personality Disorder

61

10

�:5”

HOSPITAL STAY
K

ONE YEAR

;P.sTA¥ING,OVER

‘Pﬁ

8‘1

.

20329

I

~

6

36'

“

‘

M

M

-

73

A_

w

Hillside

Menhinger

-‘

.

,

'61

in
I

'

BY AGE

j

:‘35

~7f

6

I

I

‘

3,0

2.5,;

-

.

2’0

,

0

.

.

,

0

0

�7142b,

’-

”‘7‘;

aceiopsyuhelogieal 13:11:00 of
Pnyuhintric Trontnoat in fire. Voluntary loupttuls

Robert L.

Iain,

P&amp;.D.ﬁ,

in: Pollack,

Ph.D.

lathauxol stag-1, Ph.D.
and

an: Pink, 3.5.

tho Bcpartlont of InpurtHOItal fuybhtntry, lillutdn
fro. 61¢:
Oaks. L.I., 3.1.
loapttnl,
Atdud, in parﬁ. by 29.3% lt-IOOI or the latiounl InItStn‘c’
of labial It‘l‘h. 8.8. ,ublic Inllth aorticag and tho Iguasu
County Keats: Bealth Beard.

the cacpcrntion of tho stuff. a: the nan-nonalctta mantel
Italth Ccntar and the C.?. Hanninacr Nauorial ﬂospital 13

grutctully nokaculodcod.
irresant Address: Rivision of Paynhiatry, Haatofioro Hoapital.

l.!.

67, l.!.
7!!!! h/62

�In pruvioua coat-payohologionl s‘udioa or

leapitcl papulntion a.

obncrvcd

educatiou,plutu of birth
aenlu

rut. Iignitiountly

01 galact1on

and

th‘t

scar.

ﬁt. 3:11.1do

tuck a-pccta an :30,
on

the calitoruiu

I

Pointed ‘0 tbs trcntncut variation

or trontumut. «11:10.1 disuse-1.. dura‘iou o:

hacpitaliuatton gut treatment cytltation.

It

was

ltggoutad

at thut tins that tho can. influenco or noelal variation
on

the treat-cut process Inuit b. observed upon: institutions.

to tact this auggontion a: wall as to roylieuto the stud:
within inntitutiona, tho prusont study of three hoapitell

val undattakta.
In

a.

their study or

ﬂu

Baron

panhin‘ric mutant

populsticu. Holliaguhoad and Budlizh rapertud alanifiiaat

rtlntlonthlyu button»

smut”

an

individual'a vanities

1n thu 0001.1

pmduu tented 111”". two:
at amend uurdcra a: nu- ma «nu-n or pay-untu-

duo

troatnont cdnintutarod
economic

status

or

and tho

(

upon tho

).

fl.

influoaeo o: patton‘

availability or trcnt1ag peruouuol

�.-9.
van nut ﬁxalndod in this. :tudlua. 1b tact the :01. of
coats: factors in tho triatunnt.or hoapttaltaod patients
inﬂaptnddnt or puticnt'l tibiae-a 3nd dvcalnbillty of
trnatacnta, I patiout burv.y In: undortakcn It lillolda
1§§7.
in
Ia thza‘hcapita\. a variaty’ct ﬁrockuuut
Ibmyiﬁtl
ptychoéhnrnpy
and organic
Ind-n, including individual
thorupiua are attllahlo to all pattints rlgardlosu or
tags: abilzhy ﬁe pay.
In in. tillaido study. Ian. canonﬁton and 31-00 at
birth cur. utgnttlnuaﬁly nouontatcd ut‘h chain. of trudaaont,
duration at honpatglicntaan. alsuxeul diachnrxo aval‘ntiou Ind
diagnonlt ( ). It Ill ohncvvod that patiuntn hounltnliuod
for th- Ihortnus plrild aura the oldest, had tn. loant cane.»
tic: :36 «are taut liktly to bats hut: foreign hnvu. The:
wit. prudoulnnntly £rc-ﬁnd by ouuvulutvo ‘horipy and rocuivnd
it. not. fuvauahla diachnrsn ratinga. Ibnngur. unttv. horn
and not. sdnaatcd paticnza.uuro hospitalinod ﬁho lenzuce.
puyahoﬁhcrnéy
and goaorallr roaotvod
trantnd prilntlly ﬁr
it: 90020! dischargo rattaga. it. 011310.: (Inter: 0‘3.
51:0 rtluted ta n I.nauru of starcatrpy, tn. culttornia r
80.1. ( ). lxahar I canton Int. tor. o:%ca tound an
pu$1onts diagnccod an invalullannl pagthcutn, ruturrua far
nonntto shorapy. and hasvttaltaad :91 unartor parted, and
nor- Qtttu Uﬂfi vitae as much Anymovod or roger-rod.
it in. 6.01301 to tupont tin 195? .111016. study uuployiug
tha nan. procaaursu nnd nongurrtntly ta axteué who obstrvutaona
I

_

.

�.3lnatitnttenu vtth roopact to social alsas. 33o. oduottioa
and

I

to tho

scorn. ﬁnd to relate than. pats-at charactorlttica

trtct-ont variahlqs of type if troutsont. duration

at hospitalisation, diagnosis

A

and Ginsburg. evaluation.

m

enact: a! :11 voluntary. .dult patient. in roatdoaco

in than. tuititattona

was nadortakou

in January 1959. ﬂh$10

lcln1n¢¢r and Hillatdo Hospitals hnd ‘luatary pationta aalr.

t

3:311 avatar

at tho-e at

Danton were anntguod by tho

tor psychiatric avalnntton, or war. nc-bcta at
aohisophroaxe

stat.

hounttql group tralalorrod

3

can’t-

annual.

ter a optoitia

ruloarch product. Thane pationta war. cxoludad from the
study banana. at tacit non-vuluntcry ntntun. Inch pnttent

III

:17.» th- cglitoraiu

ligation

tutti: lctar

r 39.1.

(

) on

the OOBIII any.

the rooordo or dilohnrgod patient-

voro untlyucd to dotorninu tho c.0131 and psychiatric factor-

ar the otudy. For a mutant. of $03111 glass, the ﬁclliucahoud

�.‘5-

2-tuetor ind-x

was 3.06 t

of 173 putllatn

at

).

Thu

81113140. zoo

study population consisted

at lbaalncor

and 95

at

ti. rnlationu

or

Untouchuootta Haltnl ﬂcalth cantor (nuns).
Tho

study inelndcd «lamination a:

in.

social to th- paychlutrtu wart-hlcu within each institution,

2h...

as wall as butunua inaﬁltatlons.

difficult,

hcunvor, boon-no

fora-con discunncd below.

comparisons were

at variouqnnthodologlenl d1:-

9h... difficulttca var.

nosQ

Infkﬂd 1n the iatrnhaupitnl anupnrasean, and accordingly,

in tin unnlynou a: p-yuhlntpta varinhloc emphasis will be

lantttutiana, with citation

plannd on tho daft-ronaus §atvoen

or

lb. intra-tnotltutiannl tronde.

Whoa

tho otruotnru

rcportlnc studs-u fro! a lone institution,

at tho houpltul 1-

%ahoa

tar grunt-d.

and

01th::

ignored or Icnttunud briefly. Houwvur, in studying a atranco

�a.
institutien

I“. “at
will.

I.

and

author
t6
:ttcuptias
canaarablo ant: ya. in

of tho my

allot-«cu but.” “autumn.

tclcotod than. tuttituttont an eolpurablo in

‘bnchlag, rtaoarch, and troatunut pryxruuu, we

tinc that tho:

are unalika atrnct‘rolly in v.11 think influanca tn. data

at the study. specific prohlona

were notcd 1n dastgnatioul

or type a: trnstu-nt, diaguont1a turns and avuluatiau or

trontnnnt outcono.
a) 90:1 ation a!

a

at

cntlant:

Th-

critorin for

danagatting that a paticut raceiv'd 'pcychotharupy' dirt-90¢
along

an natiwtulu, Idling “Remus: «uniﬁcation

aux-nun.
At ﬂoaningcr Hospital puyuhothurtpy use designated

a trogtnaat qdninictcrod an a pro-criytiou

ball:

by a

stat!

pcyvhiaﬁriat, for which th- pattont via chtrgud a too.
ﬁenatone with tho ptynhintrta rnnidunt were considered

or routine unaiaiutrattva pationt aura.

part

.0

�.j.

it Hillside lsspiisl psyshsthsrspy was

astinsd ss

viih
tho psychistrio rssidsnt. star!
trsstasut ssssioas
psychiatrisss.¢id not

trssii patisuts,

but rsstristsd thsir

activities to supervising tbs residsnt physicians.

it
was

ths Massachusetts xsntsl ﬁsslth csntsr payohothsrspy

assignstsd ss s functiea or

many

disoiplinss -- psyuhu

istris rssidsnts, psychologists. socisi

worksrs. nurses sad

msdiasi studsats. Portal records a: sash ssssions wars nos

routinely insiuded in the patisnﬁ's rscorﬁ and to ssesrisin
which

pstisnts rseoivsd psychotherapy.

it was

nocsssnrr for

this study toss to intorviss tbs reaidsuis in churns

washers of

o: ssch cssa.
b) n

'

asis: individual institutionsl disguostic

stylus slso Isds soupsrissns difficult.

it

lbsnisgsr lsspitsl

disgussss supisysd ths sultipis svslustss ﬁsts caucus
asses-sadsd by ths Aussiosn Psychisiric Association

hsih Hillsids sad asstsu

sun-piss

sails

toil-Ila usicsry systsss. assorsl

st discussss tron lsssiussr sss listsd in 2:51. I,

�-3with our ausgaatad aonvarazana into catacortaa nonparabla

to that of tha nth-r tan inatttationa. Thaaa convaratona

at.

an unavoidahla aaaraa of

distortion. (statlar abaarva-

taona hava baan rapartad by Paaaaaatak and hia aaaocxataa
(

) who

indicata that diagnoaaa within tho aaaa inatitatiaa

ara alao valnarabla to individual dixtaraacaa anon: ataxiaara).
Tabla I

ﬁ---“3) ntgoggg‘a gating; of Igggovaaaatn

gravalant varied

1n

Iattnga a:

1n—

foraat and datatl. rho diauharga rating

at nanninaar loapxtal aaa tripartite with a aaparata avaluattaa
for social aharaatarolaalaal and ayndraaa ahanaaa. I111a1da
&gt;

Raapttal and ﬂaaaaahnaatta aantal Iaalth cantor had aloha:

ntiuga I! in

at

aaeh

which

it "a

difficult to aaaaaa the ontﬁbatton

taetcr of tha Haaaiaxar ayutaa (Tabla II). for

this atudy tho Iaaningar

ayudraua

rating aaa couparad to tha

global ratinaa of tha athar iaatltattana.

�.9.

fibl. I!
2.

aootgzgzggologiog; Vagiablaa
Ina diatrtbattan

at the variation of aooial 01a...

aga, adacattoa and calttornia

institution: in praaautad

1n

r

saala scar: along tha taro.

tabla III.

a) ﬁgg§.;_g;§ggn tiara uaa a Iarkad dittaranaa in
tho aaaial clans coup-attic:

at tho thraa inatttattona.

Nautilus: loapttal tha reputation

was

At

pradantnantly app-r

class; at Hillatda laapttal Itddla alas-3

and

at laaaaahuaatta

lantal Baalth cantar, pvadaainantly 101a: alaaa.
h) 553:

that. war. as airfaronaaa in

ago

«attribu-

patulattaao.
tion in tho institutional
a) Eduggtions

rho populatzoaa dxttarad 1:

tanta-

ttaaal attatnlaat, 11th pattaata at naauiagar leapital having
not. yaara at educattou than than. at Baa-annuaatta lautal

laalth Cantat.

33110

kl ya: want at tho pattanta at also

�-19-

ha: aat couplutad high ottool, only
and 23 per cent

32

par cont at Hillsidt

nt loaningur did not graduate.

Bittﬂrcnccs
é) {nggggy
in ‘3. distributtcu or

can

on tho

annoy-nu I 80.1.. mo obs-nu. titty-cu
V

9.: can: or

lbnnancor puttautn had

only night par cont

I
In

coor¢n below 30, gnu

scorn. of 50 or show. ~- thn higher

accrue 5.13: associated with highor dcgruos or stereotypy.

eaatraat, gt

I Inuit,
At

'1‘!

I

Boston

trout: 9.! coat unto hula:

and forty-two par 3.9% had scores

Hillside thirtybonc

paw

at

30 on tho

50 or nor¢.

south! the vationta had I uaorol

bolaw 30 sad otzhtatn por goat ubOVt 50.

In nun-cry,
.09131 class
'

its

a: the ptpllatiun val oblorvcd :3

uncut arr-nun
on

anticipatod dittorouetu in prudaninalt

ﬁt. r 30:10. 2h.

1a

ago

mutual

dtutrlhatioa

d1£rtrcnoon thus par-1t tho

the institationa.

hum-cat
«14 not

I011 on cigo

an:

mum“

11:20:. Then.

stair a: troutncut variables

along

�sum

Wm

ﬁeduaigﬂgtion a; D§ge§gggg gag‘noggs

M" an mmm

nuproncivo reaction
I. ﬂnrczsaiatic
Foraonality

Payehanuaroniu

8. Anxiety reaction

larezsalatto Personality

3. lavas-oistto Personality
#-

latoisoaltac Puruonaltty
tlaoholiuu Chronic
Infantilo Portolnlity

S. Fusttvc Asgruacivc
’oroonality
Alaaholxaa

6. Infantila Personality
Sohiuophrunsc Ioaotaun

antitanltfucttg. typo

Psynhalturoais
'

Poruouulity fruit
niatnrhanco

sociopathic Paraanality
niuﬁlrbunoo

Seatapnthio Pirwnxrllﬁy
ﬁiaturbanao

achisnphrauic Flywheels

�aggzggattvo ﬁgttugg gt glgngog; geudition

IIIIIHGII

BOSPIZIL

33218132 HOSPITAL

ﬁllﬂlﬁﬂﬂalfiﬂ
gg‘bfﬁ

CENTRE

locovurnd

loaovorod

Each lproved

Eark¢d1y Improved

Ingrovod

Hadnratoly Inprovod

Unznprevod

slightly Inprovcd
Enimproved

60I§10to admission

Ilprlvud
Fuehnnged {or were.)

HEHYIL

�ammonia). muggy»souguzcholoﬁut

1'3;

Yuan“

Hanna. ’nuluhmutn
Ear-pun luau). Rum:

liming"
30-pin).

Gum

31$

75

3%

'

Saul
c1».

.

Au

51

20

as

1?

35

13

1

3h

28

0

S

28

19$

19!
se

59
22

,

p-n.l.

23

at
Ian
“mutton

33-9.?

-

'

5.0!.

W005

X..3909

did:

9‘ a 001

�m

m.

_

.

i

typo of

'1'th

Psychotherapy

W
mum

t

£10,111th

manhunt:-

mmani

215

Sal-nu

1:3

mm»

36

H1111“.

Baum.

’

;

my. mm

36%

21a:

63;

68

-

.

B

�.113.

7:23;;gt510 frogtysnt Vagiuhlog
a) Soloetton or front-onto than: tultltucionn, taunt

yattoutn 3‘ Ian-13:0: uoapttal rucctvcd sciatic thornpr
than n$ ﬂail-14. or "Ric, (fable

2').

caucnrron£1y a cnnllur

parenting. or the nuaatuucr patttnia vita 013.004 to rocctvlng
payche‘horupyp with a 132:. author (36

Iilica tor-- of treats-at.
was an

£111.14.

lotpttnl - that.

spacial doutcuataon tor Itliou therapies sud pationtn

are 01:13:21.6

:-

rocolvtuc payoho‘hcrapy

Iont also. Iaﬁh pattbnt

psychiatrist for at
nook.

1%

pit cant) rteotving

:-

10.1%

II

n

priusry trout-

tohcdnlod to so. u valid-mt

tar...

ouoohalt hour session: per

2h; pcrooaﬁacc 0: pa‘tou‘o rocotvtnu lunatic thorupy,

at louatuscr natpltnl (3h!) 1. Isgntttcan‘ly 1-3: than n‘
ot‘hor at tho 0th.! in. houpttalu.
lﬁbﬂt patient. ulnacad

II

cahtxophrcntn. thnr. was no

atrrurunoo along houpltalo. for 10.30; a: such pationt' at
each

hospital recoivod notatio for.» of troatnont during

�-13.

It.

hpnplltllsnﬁlon.
1: hated

on $ho

thé
altroroaogu anon:
laltlﬁutloua

dittorlng attitude. lounrdo gallant;

oloacltlod a. puyohonourotlo, bahavlor diaordor sad dcprocnlvn payohoaln.

its turn. llotltutlonl

b)‘a3glgggg_g‘_lglg;§.;§g§§§ggs

«11:09.4 with racy-ct lo pullout'n lcnuth 0:

its:

(2331. IV).

loaning-r Hospital patlualo v.9. hocpltalluod least-t. with
653

a! pntlnnta rounlnlln for witlvu mouth. or loan. cou-

‘1
93304 to 31 par cant
lb. 8111.140 pattcntl and only

5

91-:

cast or £30.. Qt the lhcauohnnottn lontal loalth Ooutnr.
ﬂi- Iodd any of tho
clovgn tenth:

lull-id.

group

II but»: urea

will. two-thirds of the

diachgrsod within

Boston

and

valiant: cor.

.1: tenth: of hoayllalllatlaa.
In cash hospital. tout pntlanta

arc ovqltatod

uﬁ tho

tan. or discharuu ca 'lnprovcd* (tnblo 11).

ll lounlugar loopttal.

havuvur. a blunt: poroautnco (l9!) 0:

pttluutn turn rated II 'Inluprovud* and only a tingle psﬁluat

�.13.
woo

oollod 'sosovosod' or 'sooh ispsovod'. rho hishost

possontoso or “rooovosod' or “soon iopsovod' sstinas (881)
sod tho ioooot provostioo

st

at ‘osiopsovod' (10$)

ooso (bond

Boston.
d) ggg‘ggggg; For

otstistissl ossiysis

throo diogaostis

groupings soso nods: sohioophrouis, ottostivo disosdoss,
sad poyohonoorosis sud porosasiity disssdoss (roblo IV).
tho diocoostio proportions of pstiosts within thoso groups

loss sinilss tor lilisido sad lostoo in that slightly ovor
holt discussod as sshisophssnio sad oppsouiootoiy oso-qoostor
os psychooonrosio or ottootivo disordos.

In sootssst ot

Housings: loopitoi, poyoholsosooio sad possouslity dioosdor

to:

oooooatod

.

ovos

n

1. lo

titty pot
O

0 o

i

coat of tho popslstion.

1

Probl

Vsriols nothodoiosieol problsss vitistod intro-hospital

ototi'otisol sou-potions. lost pro-issue. on tho has of
loosinxtul out-or! ssitorio for subdivision or populstions.

�-m-

ft:

oxaaplc. in ecuparo instituiioau in rpiniiou to Inacth

or hospital Iiay, vuriouu eat-ct: varied: var. iriod uni n03.

it lanaiacar lonvisui.

Clio-04 for coupIr-blo distributioao.

oat-quarto: at tho pationto runaiaod turn:
Ina SII~thrdl taro than tunivo Inathu.

its:

auto: suntan,

it Insoashtlottn

ncnini laaiih easier, in couttuot. 70! at :11 paiioatu ro-

ttinod 103!

ill:

ncvca months, and only 6’

:99. than tapivc

Ionian.
Anothtr aspect

III

tho oouatriotica of tutoroconoity

or the population sulpic. In in. Boston group, tho crucial
rooturoh patient. and th- uonrt roturrais sure hath dnlotod.

in contra-tins tho_1957 and 1959

xiii-id. papuiutioa, II

ob-orvad n uicaitieant accr.ano in

it.

an. o: oomvuinivo ihorapy

its

and an

at pniiulia under tho :3. o: to.

II.

number

a: cit-r patiouta,

inure... in the

coupurnhiiiiy a: as.

group: in tho turn. halpitulo in this I‘Id’ lakes

ihat similar pron-cunt lay

lattes

rumba!

have oocarrod in

it 113.17

in. ﬁre-cat

and lonuiacor populatioan. than ducrcioina

tn. rang.

�.13.,

e: ﬁle diecueetie, treatment
In

verieblee.

end ecneetieuel

elnttleu, Iteeiug tutorletlea

eeelel oleee

an

leﬁerntuetaeqlee e teeter in vitietlng £ntre-heep1te1 eelperteeae with sate variable.
In deteretetux eeetel eleee enere wee tater-eeiee

W
eveileble for 29! e!

petieute. thleeetrteble eeeee

371

occurred where the edncetlen o: the huebend e! e heueea

site

Or

the tether e: e miner

wee

ne‘ reeorded.

alibi: these letheeelegteel ltnttettene.

e number 0:

the latte-heepltel eelperleele rare of eizatfleenee. With

recerd to selection or treetleut. age end

I

eeere were

significantly releted et Healteger Ieepltel (elder
higher

r aom pan-nu

therapy) end 1 Score

wee

were frequently

end

unsung eon“.

releted te zreetnen‘ eeleetion et

I111e14e.
In “eaten-u evaluation.

t. ere an e teatime: tor older

petten‘e te be re‘ed better then younger euee et lilletde'
end Benton; but

at leantncer there

wee en

eppeette trend.

�-15...

with oldcr ptttoato nor. likely $0 be rated tninprovud;

finial: 0: .3.

Loasth n: haupttalllnzttn and tho

causation

III.

loup¢tols

.

rolutod

st

.ai Itll-tdo

tho youugur IB“XCOI oduoatod putts-ta riulntu;

tar tin luacont parted.
that.

dunonatrntod In

in Danica (13b1pa$1sa$s Ind-r

rilntionahipn
1%

bo‘h tho Honnlatcr

un‘

V)

Whiz- such ruluttoanhtpn

two

hoart‘nla,

riot. a. vnttcatl

I

01:11::

it.

trail

070: be. but

13 noted

1&amp;1

a:

as. to taunt: loucor than/n 70.2. 31.11::

It.

for education, and for diacuousl.

30%04

abusinzor noupttcl the poroautaco at pationtn with ﬁho

dinxnoain at ouhtaophrausu.uho wore hoapttalinod ova: an.

yin:

II.

911.

at ltlllld. [capital

laltal luulth cantor 7!.

C...”rablo

V

35‘ and

at luaucshlcotto

�#
.W
IGRPI‘I‘IL

”ﬁll“a; 0: 53!
an.

Mon to

3H!

3'! £63

21! £32

6501!? 8131136 0785

W

.

‘0
.35...“

M

81.

ha

73

36

6

30*”

61

30

6

ho-M

so

to

o

50 o

36

o

o

tan-29

11:

�.17In thin nonpartgon of this. vquatary payhhtntria hocpt‘alc
we have obs-trad significant tu$ar1act1tutzoanl diff-roast. or
puﬁtcu:a tn ‘hc social vurxabznt or want. a: oduaa$1on tad .00131'

.1305, But not .50: a: itaﬁribuﬁinu o: calitoruta r anal. sacral;
Ind ta ouch a! ﬁho irnuIn-n$ variation ~~ duration at haupl‘oltunitaa, noloo‘ton at invaalsl§a and dia‘rtbutaona a: (taunt...
uni dischargu Isuzunttnnt. in. oxpoctn‘ion ﬁhat the institutton
carving «99¢! G1.il pattnuts vault but. the long-at durattou o:
otur: I uschu! pvoporttan a: payuholourotao Gianna... and nor:
ooupluu diagnosﬁﬁc nah-nuts; lunar preporttoa a! patients requiring
organs. turn. or thavnpwa and peasant ditchuruu 1:31:30 use. each
contarlnd. 81-41331!) tho tuctttution serving lav-r clan- putioata
lvtnoad Ibortar purtoda at hocpttnllnutita, 10w proportaaua at
pay-honaurotio cinema-us. and bot‘ar 41:03.13. uvnllaﬁaonl. In
addition, tho diatrihitt-II at r 30.1. scorn. anon; tho that.
hn0p1%aln tollaund tic arising: atllaidc it‘d: in that low accruuurc lost uhnrtn%¢rtnt1u at tho upper :1... group, and high score:
at the lava! 0130-.
1951
mam.
n:
mu»by ropltoaﬁaon 3% Islamic; $ﬂ 1959. a: null no tntvn—tua‘ttuttonal
‘

a. “mg a

«m:- m

am

analysts 5‘ tbs oﬁh'r ﬁn. holpttalo. '0 VII. intuucooutul. It.
‘33. tuttod to anhlcv: a‘a‘tn‘ionl Itgnittonacu. in part huaunuo
at variomy or no‘hodologtcal prohluun. bnﬁ th- trcudu of tho
laﬁa I?! 01-11:: to the ortxtaal study.

.

�.18.
wall- theee etedlee have egeln eupheeleed the rele et

eeeiel tedbre

1n

peyehletrle tees-eat,

we

neat.
have been

lepreeeed by eke letheeelezleel preble-e e: etedleepereee

laeeltetlene. theee leetltelleee

were eeleeted

tee their

edeeetlenel leederehlp end eke expeetetlea thee the recorded

vertehlee would be eleerly defined. our dirtteelelee 1a

errlvtec et eoapereble dete ere invertent euee to the preblee
o: the eeeventlenel eee e: eeeperettve eeetletloe. eepeelelly
treqeene
in the evelietlel e: peyehleerie thereplee. ihe
eee e: dleeherze

retinal, alecueeele eleeeee or length or

heepltelleetlen ee craterle in therapeutic eveluetleue er
ldeatltleetlen
the
e: eeepereblle populetloae ere enhaece

te exceeelve error enleee

eke

tee stainletrettve peteerne.

lnetlteeleee ere eleerly eetehed
The

peredexleel neenre e: e

fellere te eeeeent for tneeltelleeel idleeyaereelee
be eeea 1: e

llterel :nterpretetlee e: the

1e

to

observation or sale

etedy. fhe Reﬁnance! neepllel bee the leet highly trelued

�.19.
par-onuol conducting trontuant thick to applied fur iudtvtda
Optimal port-dd

utlly Outta-a.

ti. 10:33 propnrticn

at tinny in population. with

diagnaaud 1: an unfavorahlo prognostic

grasp (nahtnophron1n1

.

-

and

rut. tn. proportion of ruportod

(ivornblc traatlont rouulta 1. tin recruit.

It

lintll lanlth

10.3%

cantor, 1a contra-t, that.

th-rnpiltn apply trout-nuts tor

its

atlluahunuttu

an administruttvaly

t'utnod

lilatod

potted, to a populntlou with a hithcr pruportton diagnouud
an tahtuophrunta. the propor$1ou or

Ihorco raﬁanaa

:-

than. dhnIrVn$£ann

tarornhlc

III-It: 41--

otgnatto-ntly grants!) 1‘ to yrobnhlo
do not garlogs

%hu%

the thirapoutlo efficacy

a! «a... tnltatuttann. but ludioutnn differ-aces

1n

oritnrtn

or ilprﬂvnncat.

this luck of clarity in

dilanos%1c Ichcuatn and 130.!-

pnrthtlity or pnyuhiatrac truinant 1:31.310: :10. load.
panic tn

tn. attc-ptcd

comparative stanzas 0: psychiatric

tbcrapioa. for tun-win. tho rlIh or roounﬁrntlurcn o:

�.26-

hioleslatl caloutlltl to contlrn obnorvatloaa and. 1: othor
laboratorlou In:

bu as such a

rotlcntlau o: dittoruaec. in

popnlttloau. payehlnlrlo orltarln,'g§g, an fallout.- 1: the

original hapothcuon. the widcaprhad
“cohltophr'uln' or ‘puyahououroslu'

II.
£0

at

Utah

turn. as

caplet. tho

ohnngoa

in payuhdbatonl or blclogluol tosGIrOI with mental 111:...

ha. 1.! to a totals. burdcnod by nasatSVI result: (lullnk).
coat Ijrkad ruouutly in lb. atatlletlng stadium at

taste: in anhinophruals.
physiological

~~

and tho lneonparnblllty

bohuvlornl corrolntlona Icon 1.

(runkuuulnln) and meantiou threshold

tutti.

Sven

I

It'll

at the
t3. Incholyl
turn I

1.111 ohnurvntloa to b. roportod from on. allnlo. in

v. is!-

II‘hOdl twillablo to doccrlba povulctluno adoquntol: lo
provido 1 00.34 ountlrun‘lon?

270: than. obocrvntiaal

at icllavu ao‘,

and concludn

tint lucrtnuoa attention list to

p.16 to the nothodlocloal problana of clnaaltylix substatby

'objoativo' criteria. rcthor thus ta. pro-oat lathe!-

uhlnh,uppo-r to ho so highly dcponloat an inatttutlonnl

�-g1.
:ad ohatrvur nttiiudul, and tho nociepoyuhoiegieul nspuctc or

it.

thorupintapnsiont intcraction.

studio: :13. highlight the situate of changing

!hnuu

populatidns on Iinilnr
mind:

than

italics.

lillnido lbnpitsl

rho peasant

that: rich! soaiopayuholocicai~troatlcat rclntioachipu

it.

1957. rufloo‘inc.

I.

btliovu, a constriction in tho

typo. ﬁt trout-out. and th- .30 runs. at tho patiuntu.

flora in; a nicnitiegnt rnduoiiou in the

inure... in
Icflocting

anon oduontionai iovdi

an 13010... in

noun

use, and as

o: its population,

it. nunbar of aJQIOlotnt and 33.33

aduli patients. baring in. in. yaw! purine, that. can 31.0
a untied voduoiion in tho

incruasc in
czalndnd
was

iii.

it.

nan

u:- o: couvuluivv ihar:py

chain. in the 1957 Itudy, wail.

tho aoliacnt lunatic truatloat or thin study.

at in. pvt-ant study,
and a

z:

at poyuhatropic 4213!. art; ihorupy In.

:- s irontlaat

‘OOOp‘QEQO

and

dittttcat

ii had both a crcntcr

it

it

the

stuff

psychological mooning than can.

vulaivu incrlpr. Ind hearing, parhapc a diff-punt mulbioachip

to attic! variablnn.

its availability at

an

ottoctivcihorupy

�9.2;.

(or viauruua tout tor sinusitiaation) nay liaidbo in.

intin-uco or uoeial «in-I vurinhlcu

lliiin‘ahnad Ina lodiich (bund
clans aad typo a: truttnayt
did for tho oehiuophroaiaa.
317.3

dial-cu, than

in n

rolatittly ottaoiivu,

n0

on

iruatnnut. Etna.

rulntion intros: loci-1

tar attentivt

'fhil

payohoni: but tho:

aﬁccontc that

trail-at mils“.

it,

which

inaxp-nnivu and tachaically

for a

i.

lilplo.

01.0: ditfnruueun nay ho Podtcld, but not niiuiaaﬁod‘.
2:11. that. inter-hospital dittoroncoo 8‘! he loak¢d

initial liliallc inirn-houpitai
‘

um. um peanuts.»

and

It. iatcrauiin DIOOOIIOI
and expectation! of tho

atndy. Xt_io our i-pr03Ii0I.

tron-out

mm “bun-hip.

1.9301: Invited iron

tint:

and

authoriticu

it.

.ttiiudoo

uiilil

0.83

institution.‘ thug. duration or patient tiny. Ginsburg.
rating, type or transient anniniotcrod ind diagnosis are In

�-52..

dutcrltuod an Inch by ‘30 attitude 6! the phyuiotnn and thy

hanpttal niltcn 1a which tho‘pcsinlt rind: hilonlt. a: In:

acuitollntion o: uyupttu or history which in In: pros¢nt.
snob ralntionshapa

ooaditlna

tiara

will he host lurkod in than. psychiatric

that. diagnostic critnrin at. lunn‘

39.01119. 5‘3‘,

tho obaaoQavu «9:53:13 aloostntod with 4300....

hats: arcs-10 inpuirI-nt arc ahacnt,

at

an an achisuphrcuin.

plynhancurolsn, and pcraouazt‘y and bohavior disordcrc.
Vain: conditacnn or anbtcnitr tbs obcurvor'l internal can.

(ntttwudal. alpoctttionl) hood-o
and

by

clansiticatton

hamlet,

(

tic ball. for pyrotptton

). this via:

31.1%: and

1.1!“!

1!:

was

clonrly douonu$rutcd

ﬂair

study of

vandal

in dingao¢1u within a £13315 institution. Th0: dbuurvod

that 1: pnttnuts rials-1: assign-d to ditturoaf lords inns
powulattonl d1! not 6111.: in sang

it Idlllltin, Inrttal

otntnn. vasecttla. as. or contain... stxusftoaa$ 41:211-300.
41¢ occur, hcvcvnr. 1- 13014030. of diagnoses anon;

tItIO

�5""?

mg “m ammuuun- in on an.
u that unman- mo notably at “he.“ in the mmu». I. an.“ they at largely "nuan- of tho “«Nu.

and

uts“: at the Ian-1:0".

�Sociopsychological Aspects of
Psychiatric Treatment in Three Voluntary HoSpitals

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.*,

Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Nathaniel Siegel, Ph.D.
and
Max

From

M.D.

the Department of EXperimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital,
N.Y.

L.I.,
Aided, in part,
Mental
U.S.

‘Glen Oaks,

Fink,

Health,
Mental Health Board.

by grant MY-2092 of the National Institute of
Public Health Service; and the Nassau County

cosperation of the staffs of the Massachusetts Mental Health
Center and the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital is gratefully
The

acknowledged.
NOYI

*

Present Address: Division of Psychiatry, Montefiore HOSpital,
NOYO

67,

�Recent community studies have demonstrated

relationship
between social factors and psychiatric treatment. In their study
of the New Haven psychiatric patient population, Hollingshead and
Redlich reported significant relationships between an individual's
position in the social class structure and the prevalence of treated

illness, types

a

of diagnosed disorders and kinds and duration of

psychiatric treatment administered (3). The influence of patient
economic status upon the availability of treating personnel, however,
was not excluded in these studies. To test the role of social
factors in the treatment of hospitalized patients independent of
patient's finances and availability of treatments, a survey was
undertaken at Hillside Hospital in 1957. In this hospital, a
variety of treatment modes, including individual psychotherapy and
organic therapies are available to all patients regardless of their

ability to pay.
In the Hillside studies (h,S)

it

that patients
hospitalized for the shortest period were the oldest, had the least
education and were most likely to have been foreign born. The older,
less educated patients were predominantly treated by convulsive
therapy and received the more favorable discharge ratings. Younger,
native born and more educated patients were hospitalized the longest,
treated primarily by psychotherapy and generally received the poorer
discharge ratings. The clinical factors were also related to a
measure of stereotypy, the California F Scale (1,6). Higher F
scores, i.e., greater stereotypy, were often found in patients
was observed

�-2diagnosed as involutional psychosis

who

were

referred for somatic

therapy, hospitalized for a shorter period, and more often were
rated as much improved or recovered.
Another hypothesis developed at this time was that differences
in various aspects of psychiatric treatment among hospitals should
show the same relationship to social factors as noted within Hillside
Hospital. To test this suggestion it was decided to employ the
procedures of the 195? Hillside study in three institutions -Hillside Hospital, the C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital of Topeka
and the Massachusetts Mental Health Center of Boston. These institutions were selected with the expectation that they served patients
of different social classes. It was anticipated that in these
hospitals there would be a similarity in attitude towards treatment
and education. Each is a teaching hospital with a full time supervisory staff and active research departments. They emphasize
psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy but provide other treatments such as somatic therapies and active programs of milieu therapy.
Each stresses short-term treatment of voluntary patients and does
not provide custodial care.
The specific aims of this study were to determine the population
characteristics of the three institutions with respect to social
class, age, education and F score: and to relate these characteristics
to the treatment variables of type of treatment, duration of hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge evaluation among the institutions.

�-3METHOD

these
in
residence
in
adult
patients
census of all voluntary,
and
Menninger
While
1959.
institutions was undertaken in January,
of
number
small
a
only,
Hillside Hospitals had voluntary patients
(MMHC)
assigned
were
Center
Health
Mental
those at the Massachusetts
chronic
a
of
members
Or
were
by the courts for psychiatric evaluation
a
for
specific
transferred
group
schizophrenic state hospital
from
the
study
excluded
These
were
research project.
patients
A

the

patient
because of their non-voluntary status.
the
months
later
F
Eighteen
California scale on the census day.
social
the
determine
to
examined
were
records of discharged patients
and psychiatric factors of the study. For a measure of social class,
Each

was given

and
education
of
score
the Hollingshead 2-factor index - weighted
173
of
consisted
The
study population
occupation - was used (2).
95
Massachusetts
the
and
at
100
Menninger
at
patients at Hillside,
a

Mental Health Center.

social
the
of
of
the
relations
examination
included
study
to the psychiatric variables within each institution as well as
The

between

institutions.

These comparisons were

difficult

however,

These
below.
discussed
differences
because of various methodological
and
comparisons,
marked
the
most
in
intrahospital
difficulties were
will
emphasis
variables
of
the
in
analyses
psychiatric
accordingly,
be placed on the differences between institutions with citation of
to
missing
led
also
These
difficulties
trends.
intrainstitutiOnal
information for some data, which is reflected in the varying
population sample sizes in the tables.

�RESULTS

A.

Inter-hosEital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems

institution, the

reporting studies
ignored
and
either
granted
for
taken
is
of
the
hospital
structure
institution
a
strange
studying
in
or mentioned briefly. However,
the
of
made
aware
is
one
data
comparable
and attempting to gather
these
selected
we
While
institutions.
between
differences
many
pro—
treatment
and
research
teaching,
in
comparable
as
institutions
wh
ways
in
structurally
unlike
were
they
found
that
we
grams,
in
noted
were
problems
Sp‘cific
the
of
study.
influenced the data
the
and
classes
diagnostic
of
treatment,
of
type
the designation
outcome.
treatment
of
evaluation
desigfor
The
criteria
8) Designation of 212s of Treatment:
the
among
differed
"psychotherapy"
received
a
nating that patient
When

from a home

difficult.
classification
in
uniformity
institutions, making
treatment
as
designated
was
At Menninger Heepital psychotherapy
for
a
psychiatrist
staff
by
basis
a
on
prescription
administered
the
psychiatric
with
Sessions
a
fee.
which the¢patient was charged
care.
patient
administrative
of
routine
considered
part
were
resident
treatment
as
defined
was
At Hillside Hospital psychotherapy
did
Staff
psychiatrists
resident.
sessions with the psychiatric
to
supervising
activities
their
not treat patients, but restricted
charged.
were
fees
No
additional
the resident physicians.

�-5At the Massachusetts Mental Health Center psychotherapy was

designated as a function of many disciplines -- psychiatric residents, psychologists, social workers, nurses and medical students.
Formal records of such sessions were not routinely included in the
patient's record and to ascertain which patients received psychotherapy it was necessary for members of the study team to interview
the resident in charge of each case.
b) Diagnosis: Individual institutional diagnostic styles made
comparisons difficult. At Menninger Hospital diagnoses employed the
multiple evaluative data scheme recommended by the American PsychiaMMHC
and
both
while
followed unitary
Association
Hillside
tric
systems. Several examples of diagnoses from Menninger are listed
in Table I, with our suggested conversions into categories comparable
to that of the other two institutions. These conversions provide a
source of distortion.

c) Discharge Ratings of Improvement:

Ratings of improvement at

the three hospitals varied in format and detail.
rating at Menninger Hospital was tripartite with

discharge
separate evalua-

The

a

tion for social, characterological and syndrome changes. Hillside
Hospital and Massachusetts Mental Health Center had global ratings
making it difficult to assess the contribution of each factor of the
Menninger system (Table II). For this study-tho Meaninger syndrome

�rating

was c

Sociopsychological Variables
age,
of
social
class,
variables
the
of
The distribution
institutions
three
the
among
F
Scale
score
and
California
education
2.

is presented in Table III.

M

social
the
in
difference
a) Social Class:
Hospital
Menninger
At
institutions.
three
the
of
class composition
Hospital,
Hillside
at
class;
upper
predominantly
was
the population
There was a marked

predominantly
Center,
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
and
at
middle class;
lower class.

b) Age:

There were no differences in age

institutional populations.

distribution in the

attaineducational
in
differed
0) Education: The populations
Menninger
at
education
of
more
years
having
with
patients
ment,
hl
While
per
Center.
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
than
at
Hospital
32
only
school,
high
MMHC
completed
not
had
Cent of the patients at
not
Menninger
graduate.
did
cent
at
23
and
per
Hillside
at
cent
per
of
distribution
the
in
differences
F
Score: Significant
d)
cent
per
Fifty-one
observed.
F
were
Scale
California
the
scores on

�-7cent
and
eight
per
only
below
30,
scores

of Menninger patients had
associated
F
being
scores
with scores of 50 or above -- the higher
thirtyHillside
at
In
contrast,
with higher degrees of stereotypy.
MMHC
while
at
30
below
F
had
scores
one per cent of the patients
F

30.
below
were
cent
only twenty per
the
of
class
social
the
in
differences
Thus, the anticipated
These
differScale.
educational attainment and performance
of
relation
the
concerning
the
hypothesis
testing
permit
ences
insti—
the
among
variables
treatment
the
to
factors
sociopsychological
on

the

F

tutions.
3.

Variables
Treatment
Psychiatric
Among
Treatment:
of
a) Selection

institutions, significant-

therapy
somatic
received
Hospital
Menninger
at
fewer
patients
ly
IV.
Table
shown
in
MMHC
(68%)
as
than at Hillside (6h%) or
differed
The
institutions
three
b) Duration of Hospitalization:
IV).
(Table
of
stay
markedly with respect to patient's length
longest,
hospitalized
were
Menninger Hospital patients
cent
31
to
compared
per
months
or
more,
twelve
for
remaining
patients
the
of
those
at
5
cent
of the Hillside patients and only per
Hillside
the
of
modal
The
stay
Massachusetts Mental Health Center.
the
of
two-thirds
while
months
was between seven and eleven
(h3%)

group

of
months
hospitalization.
six
within
MMHC patients were discharged
were
most
patients
each
In
hospital,
c) Discharge Evaluation:
At
IV).
(Table
“improved“
evaluated at the time of discharge as

�-3(19%)
of
patients
percentage
a
higher
Menninger Hospital, however,
called
was
patient
a
single
and
only
were rated as "unimproved"
"recovered"
of
The
percentage
highest
"recovered" or "much improved".
of
lowest
proportion
and
the
(28%)
"much
ratings
improved"
or
Health
Mental
Massachusetts
the
"unimproved" (10%) were found at

Center.

groupdiagnostic
three
analysis
d) Diagnosis: For statistical
and
psychodisorders,
affective
ings were made: schizophrenia,
The
diagnostic
IV).
(Table
disorders
neurosis and personality
Hillside
for
similar
were
these
groups
within
of
patients
proportions
schizophrenia
as
diagnosed
were
and MMHC in that slightly over half
disorder.
affective
or
psychoneurosis
as
one-quarter
and approximately
and
personality
psychoneurosis
Hospital
In contrast, at Menninger
the
of
population.
cent
than
per
fifty
disorder accounted for more

B.

Intra-Hospital Comparisons

Problems
Methodological
l.
by
limited
were
comparisons
The intra—hospital statistical
lack
the
was
Most
prominent
problems.
methodological
of
a variety
of
subdivision
the
for
criteria
cut-off
statistical
of meaningful
within
the
of
population
due to the homogeneity

populations, in part

analyses
the
In
statistical
size.
each institution and to the sample
had
which
obtained
were
cells
several
within a single institution

�-9-

either none or fewer than five cases, thus not permitting a satisfactory intrahospital test of the hypothesis.
2. Intra-Hospital Comparison
With this methodological limitation some trends similar to
that found in the earlier study were observed, although few were of
statistical significance. With regard to selection of treatment,
for example, age and F score were found related at Menninger Hospital
(older and higher F score patients more frequently receiving somatic
therapy), and F score alone at Hillside.
Length of hospitalization and chronological age were related at
both the Menninger and Hillside Hospitals - the younger patients
remaining for the longest period. While such relationships were
trend
two
a
in
these
was noted at the
significant
hospitals, similar
MMHC (Table V) where no
patients over ho, but lb% of patients under
the age of

20 remained

longer than

a

year.

-—-_-------

�-10..
DISCUSSION
we
hospitals
psychiatric
of
voluntary
three
In this comparison
of
differences
patients
interinstitutional
have observed significant
but
and
social
of
education
class,
of
in the social variables
years
of
each
and
F
in
Scale
scores;
not age: in distribution of California

hospitalization, selection

of

the treatment variables
treatments and distributions of diagnoses and discharge evaluatimﬁh
The expectation that the institution serving upper class patient!
would have the longest duration of stay, a higher proportion of
psychoneurotic diagnoses and more complex diagnostic schemata,10W6r
proportion of patients receiving organic forms of therapy, aM'poorest discharge ratings were each confirmed. Similarly, the ﬂﬁtitution
serving lower class patients evinced shorter periods of howitaliza—
disand
betwr
low
of
diagnoses,
psychoneurotic
proportions
tion,
charge evaluations.
It is our impression that these differences in psycuatric
treatment are more related to differences in staff attitﬂes than to
differences in population samples. The contrasts betweeninstituthccomplexity.
tions in duration of hospitalization are great, as are
of diagnostic formulations, discharge evaluations, definiﬁons of
details
and amount of recorded data These
and
the
psychotherapy,
stylistic differences cannot be dismissed as merely idiosywratic
since they follow a pattern related to social differences mnsistent
with previous findings.
—-

duration of

�-11-

treatment variable relationships appear to
be interactive processes, determined both by the attitude of the
physician and the administrative staff as by the constellation of
Such population and

history which a patient may present. Such relationships
will be most marked in those psychiatric conditions where diagnostic
criteria are least specific, 343., where the objective criteria
symptoms or

defining diseases of known organic impairment are absent, as in
schizophrenia, psychoneurosis and personality and behavior disorders.
Under conditions of perceptual or situational ambiguity the observer's
attitudes and expectations become the basis for perception and classi-

fication. This

clearly demonstrated by Pasamanick, Dinitz
and Lefton (7} in their study of variations in diagnosis within a
single institution. They observed that patients randomly assigned
to different wards did not differ in type of admission, marital
status, education, age or residence. Significant differences did
view was

occur, however, in diagnoses among the three wards and among three
administrators on one ward. As it is highly unlikely that these

differences were inherent in the population, we believe they are
reflections
of the attitudes of the examiners.
largely
It is clear that many of the present psychiatric concepts of
diagnosis or clinical evaluation have relatively little meaning when
transferred from one institution to another. If these concepts are

taken

literally

the results become paradoxical. For example,
Menninger Hospital has the most highly trained personnel conducting

treatment, keeps its patients for the longest time and has fewest

�-12-

patients diagnosed as schizophrenia.

And

yet, despite these resources

At
treatment
results.
the
poorest
and favorable factors, it reports
MMHC, in contrast, which is most inclusive in defining a therapist,
which keeps patients for the shortest periods, and which has a higher
the
reported
classed
asschizophrenia,
of
the
population
proportion

treatment results are the best.
the
does
relative
not
reflect
study
this
that
probable
is
It
Our
no
furnishes
data
of
the
institutions.
therapeutic efficacy
the
which
provides
hospital
for
determining
independent criteria
better care; nor for assessing the comparability of the population
the
based
on
evaluations
the
Since
are
of
the
in
degree
illness.
institution‘s own ratings, we believe that the differences reflect
variations in the criteria used for evaluation of improvement rather
than any intrinsic psychiatric characteristics.
In our initial Hillside study (5) it Was postulated that different criteria of improvement were utilized for persons of different

social background. It was suggested that the higher the person's
has
This
employed.
the
complex
the
criteria
more
social background
Manninger‘s
using
with
the
confirmed
study,
in
been literally
present
two
other
of
the
the
global rating
a tripartite rating compared to
which
our
on
Even
syndrome
the
rating
considering
institutions.
contention
our
is
were
based,
it
analysis
comparative statistical
in
improvement
to
we
assess
lower
apt
class
are
that for
persons
work,
resume
to
capacity
the
symptom
patient's
relief or
relation to
while for upper class persons the criteria stress such complex

�-13-

intangibles as "developing insight", or "working through one's problems."

investigations have again demonstrated the role of
social factors in psychiatric treatment, we have been considerably
impressed by the methodological problems of studies across institutions. These institutions were selected for their educational leader—
ship and the expectation that the recorded variables would be clearly
defined. But the differences in institutional style making it diffi—
cult to obtain comparable data are important cues to the problem of
the conventional use of comparative statistics, especially in the
evaluation of psychiatric therapies. The use of discharge ratings,
diagnostic classifications or length of hospitalization as criteria
in therapeutic evaluations or the identification of comparable
populations are subject to considerable error unless the institutions
are clearly matched for social class patterns in patient population
and for staff attitudes and style. These difficulties may also extend
to the failures of scientists to confirm observations made in other
laboratories, for the lack of confirmation may be as much a reflection
of differences in populations and psychiatric criteria as to errors in
the original hypotheses. The wideSpread use of such terms as "schizoWhile these

phrenia" or "psychoneurosis" to explore the changes in psychological
or biological features with mental illness has led to a science
burdened by negative results. Even were a valid observation to be

laboratory, we do not have methods available to
describe populations adequately to provide a sound confirmation.

reported from one

�~1h-

Increased attention

classifying subjects

must be paid to the methodological problems of

criteria rather than the present
and
on
institutional
dependent
highly

by "objective"

methods which appear to be so
of
the
and
aspects
the
sociopsychological
observer attitudes

pist-patient interaction.

thera-

�-15..

SUMMARY

and

CONCLUSION

hospitals,
variables.
treatment
to
related
were
characteristics
population
F
and
education
score,
social
by
defined
age,
class,
were
Populations
and were related to type of treatment, duration of hospitalization,
diagnosis and discharge evaluation.
in
observed
were
differences
2. Significant interinstitutional
and
education
of
characteristics of patient social class, years
F
of
California
scores, but not age.
distribution
3. The variations in treatment characteristics among instituthe
in
predicted
different
be
found
to
significantly
tions were
direction.
a
follow
pattern
practices
in
psychiatric
h. These variations
and
are
institutions
among
differences
class
with
social
consistent
not regarded as being idiosyncratic.
of
make
comparisons
S. The differences in institutional style
between
results
and
treatment
diagnoses, duration of hospitalization,
need
more
objective
for
and
the
and
tenuous,
institutions difficult
emphasized.
is
of
populations
of
classification
criteria
1.

In three psychotherapantic-oriented teaching

�REFERENCES

l.

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,
&amp;
New
York, Harper
Brotherg
R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality,

1950.
2.

Hollingshead, A.B.:

Two-Factor Index of Social Position, mimeo-

graphed publication.
3.

Mental
and
Class
Social
F.C.:
Redlich,
&amp; Sons, Inc.,
New
John
Wiley
York,
Community Study,

Hollingshead, A.B. and

Illness:

A

1958.

h.

R.L., Pollack,
Selection of Therapy in
M.

Kahn,

Social Factors in the
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside

and Fink, M.:
a

1957.
216-228,
g:
2.,
Kahn, R.L., Pollack, M. and Fink, M.: Sociopsychologic Aspects
of Psychiatric Treatments in a Voluntary Mental HOSpital:
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings and Diagnosis,

Ho

5.

Arch. Gen. Psychiat.,
6.

l:

565-57h, 1959.

(CaliM.:
M.
Attitude
Social
and
Fink,
Pollack,
R.L.,
&amp;
Ment.
Nerv.
F
Dis.,
J.
and
Convulsive
Therapy,
Scale)
fornia

Kahn,

130: 187-192, 1960.
7.

OrientaM.:
and
Psychiatric
S.
Lefton,
Pasamanick, B., Dinitz,
Mental
a
in
and
Treatment
to
Diagnosis
tion and Its Relation

Heapital,

Amer.

J. Psychiat.,

116: 127-132, 1959.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

Alcoholism

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�TABLE

II

Comparative Ratings of Clinical Condition
At Time of Hospital Discharge

MENNINGER HOSPITAL

Social Adjustment
Improved
Unimproved

Character Structure
Improved

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL
HEALTH CENTER

Recovered

Recovered

Much Impr oved

Markedly Improved

Improved

Moderately Improved

Unimproved

Slightly
WW-

Unimproved
Syndrome

Complete Remission
Improved
Unchanged (or worse)

~———-————-—-———

Improved

Unimproved

�TABLE

III

Comparisons for Sociopsychological Variables

Interhosgital

Menninger

Hospital

'

Hillside
Hospital

t
I

Massachusetts
Mental Health

!

i

t

t

Social

Class

EIII

%

17

3h

13

i
g

§

IV
v

1

E

t

28

�TABLE IV

Interhospital Differences in Treatment Variables
gMenninger Hillside Massachusetts

Hospital Mental Health

{Hospital

Psychotherapy
Somatic

of
Treatment

Type

68

Other

8

1

.

as”ii.ii.ii_wmm.mi“iiiiiiiiii.i,__
Duration of

Hospitalization

i:QﬁiéimﬁifAL_R$;991MW_WWWW“a.

_-._~

_-_rmi...._i__.mwt

7-11 months
1

months

“—W.W
-

came-u «rr

Recovered,

Improved

Discharge
Evaluation

Much

61

Improved

10

'Unimproved
I
..

,

m

Discharge
Diagnosis

..—W_-»lnw

w-‘W

a

.

df=h§ B&lt;.OOl.~W___
y3é29.3;
.....

Schizophrenia
Affective Psychosis

_

“p

M
1?

Psychoneurosis and
Personality Disorde

x2=23-83 df‘h? P&lt;-001

29

*__,m_.__".

�TABLE V

Duration of Hosgitalization

BX

Age

PERCENTAGE OF AGE GROUP STAYING OVER ONE YEAR

i»
mm

Below 20

Menninger

Hillside

81
73

61

3O

30

20

2422219.

�TABLE

I

Redesignation of Discharge Diagnoses

Menninger Discharge Diagnoses

Depressive reaction

Narcissistic Personality

Anxiety reaction

General Classification

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Psychoneurosis

Narcissistic Personality

Personality Trait Disturbance

‘Narcissistic Personality
Alcoholism, Chronic
Infantile Personality

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Passive Aggressive

Personality

AlcoholiSm

Sociopathic Personality
Disturbance

Infantile Personality

Schizophrenic Reaction,
Schizo-Affective Type

Schizophrenic Psychosis

�.0".

m
an.»
"mm
”turn
M
m
«trauma

in

a

Want a mu “am“.

m.

to

m:

Imitation

mums It“ ”'01:“!
M vacuum m «an.» mun. ”human
to
87
Nil
“mam"
it.
”no: u
pmuul. «Wu!
03
and
”I.
«um.
”mun- ti. mama" um: 53 by
m “Multan” at mm «- mm: It!“ t ”mm
V111
in
mu
”amt.
autumn»
h
It“
mm
m
than panama-u man: “an “uncut: ”turn um
to.“ ”am... m3", than an aunt“. cum-u «nun
or
um
has.
hum-at
that. u u
ﬁlm
or“.
and
a“
ammo-u.
mu»
m1“:
as
stadium
yum-pun 3: citation!
damn. an.
and
autumn“:
an
”um.- «yuan-n “cm
man»
a» tub for put-pun at elm-usual». Mt now an

mm“

nun-1: 4mm»: by
may “My of

munch, an»

and

um m u

31331.
a
mm:
«was:
nub
mum
“tin. not when“ an ”that! "m1: yuan-d u
01’
did
in
I!!!“
{taunt
at mm m: Quintin, m1“:
hum, man, In mm. suntan» «um»...
um um, bum. in “an.“
th- an. may «.4

in

oz»

m
u “9&amp;3“le
m‘thMMumui-d.
likely an. m aﬂm m “burnt a. 53W“...
in

�7C:

1/4,,

:

WW—
001.23]!”L”

g/
J
I:

’1

1,

5

6
7

/

.
i

.

My
I
i

"

.1

16'

1

1.!
1,

u
hi

101

o1

o

o

O.

o

()1

2

.101

1._

ﬂ

16

I ll

91

I"

1

1

°

'

“-3.

Rejec’t'

“1

ram

13

0

~

1

o

7

11

3

°

°

9

11

O1

1

ll]

o

57

-

70
7

8

001.23/3

35

&gt;

li

$7,

2312
Col.

1

‘1

IJ"

|

1

7/01.}

TALLY SHEEP

601.26/1 ‘7
,..,2

Deckf

-

D11

1

0

1

1

‘

0

.

/

9 4

.

75"

0011.29/8,9. {Mama

1%‘5‘5
I!
I

2

391

3

5

1h

0

o

Reject

O

5‘3

20111.11

X
11601.26/1

//

2

3

_

—

0.

Asa

.0

as:

1

111:

1

1

1

35‘

115

a

-

r

16
-

_

o

1

W—‘i—
01.1
Re

I

.9.—
1.

9‘

11

.3-

" M-w—«eﬁm
0
H

ect

1mm.

01

77

1

55

“_~_
53

f

�Dock:

I
,

“BALL!

Qilvcéév

31‘

comes/1

.

,

2

a?”

sum
sol-23k

,Gol.23/1

”

_

001-23/3

17

3

O

l

20

6

.

O

,

O

mutt»

‘00“

6

3

o

3

3

O

33

3

o

Reject
ICE“.

7

O

3--

o

�f

x

7“

,/;.!,/,

ﬂ

_

TALLY SHEEP

g/

001.2611 ‘7

57‘7“.”—

'

001,237.! 7‘1"" 1"
a

!

'i

,

/’

,

16

h ’* J

5

u

ﬂ

7

,.

.

”J--.

.,

x

.

.

o.

V-

o

.

o

2

~_

-

V

0

.

7.1.07

,

0

_-.

J

‘1‘

36

7

,

0

a

“I,

74.,47445
Co1.23/3
‘

7

,.

Q-

.

V

I

5

7

35"“!
7,001.23/2'

1...,_ 27 .

J

ﬁYlI ‘,

2

" bro"

Decks"

I

16

,

i

t.

..

.

.

-

57

.

.

0

0

,

-

13.
O

I

[4'
7

7
II

8
9.

7-07

ll

l

V

0

I.

iii

Owﬁl"
Reject H
warm.

”

“I":
aﬁa’
..

‘

,

,

.

I

V.

O

0.

II.

3

0

O

~

A

-

D

_

..

~ -

,

.

O

,

,

.

-

H

4
’9.

{IV/J '11.: farm/1:22.—
,

,

,

,

.16.

,

9

69.19.2311...

-

.

2

.39.-.

3

S

- -h-

.0

o

Reject

MAL
X

5‘3

//

2

not“

-

.3

-

.0

V

J.»

V.

5

.

.35‘

-

0

8'

7
‘

C?

.o

.

m____9__
0
f

_.

-

Reﬂect
-

__

.

.

43

,a

.0

_._V

.,

3

,

O

A

-601026/1

-

limo),

001.29/8,9.

Duh“

-

,,

55

.9—
.V

9‘ -

..
,3-

«wag—m...
53

/

�-3Menninger Hospital, however, a higher percentage (19%) of

patients
called

rated as "unimproved" and only a single patient was
"recovered" or "much improved". The highest percentage of "recovered"
or "much improved" ratings (28%) and the lowest proportion of
"unimproved" (10%) were found at the Massachusetts Mental Health

were

Center.
d) Diagnosis:

For

statistical analysis three diagnostic

groupings were made: schizophrenia, affective disorders, and psychoneurosis and personality disorders (Table IV). The diagnostic
proportions of patients within these groups were similar for Hillside

in that slightly over half were diagnosed as schizophrenia
and approximately one-quarter as psychoneurosis or affective disorder.
In contrast, at Menninger Hospital psychoneurosis and personality
disorder accounted for more than fifty per cent of the population.
and

MMHC

-‘---------’
Table
B.

Intra-Hospital Comparisons

l.

Methodological Problems
The

a

IV

intra-hospital statistical comparisons

variety of methodological problems.

of meaningful

statistical

cut—off

were

limited by

Most prominent was the lack

criteria for the subdivision

of

populations, in part due to the homogeneity of the population within
each institution and to the sample size. In the statistical analyses
within a single institution several cells were obtained which had

�Page 5.
COMMENTS BY

PSYCHIATRISTS

Most of the unfavorable

(1)
(2)
more

insufficient
"

criticism can

number of
"
"

be divided

into

two

complaints:

sessions per patient paid for by Project

patients

point, many apparently feel the Project should advertise itself
to its eligible subscribers, reminding them of the availability of coverage.

0n the second

Favorable criticism was in general directed at expressing approval of the
idea of testing psychiatric insurance. There were in addition a surprising number
of complimentary remarks about the planning or administration of the Project.

SUMMARY

typical participating psychiatrist is a man between 35 and 50, practicing
in Manhattan. He treats patients in the hospital as well as in his private office,
and he also does some clinic work. He has his "Boards" in psychiatry. His usual
office fee is $20 or $25.
His primary orientation in his practice is analytical and psychological. This
does not preclude his prescribing drugs or shock therapy.
The

interest in the Project is demonstrated by the fact of his participation.
If he has some adverse criticism, it is apt to be directed at the number of sessions allowed, which he regards as insufficient, or at the small number of patients
who have sought care, which he regards as a reflection of an inadequate educational
program. In short, his criticism is generated by his tendency to view the Project
as a social rather than an insurance experiment. He feels the Project, Operating
in an area where the supply of private psychiatric time apparently exceeds the
demand, is in a unique position to promote more psychiatry for more people, which
is what he really wants - insurance or no.
His

APA-NAMH-GHI RESEARCH PROJECT

August 30, 1960

�MWQQIPWZMMMWMS.

mmuummmumuaumm
umm-mmmyutnwmuum

mmmummmammw

«mummy-"um.

mmumtmmmuwm
mmnm.mumn
nun-1 mm m "WW nu»
M
m

mnﬂMmMWmuumu-m

ml;

Wax.

m-

1:

m», W‘s:

”.mtunmwmmtm.mm

Mnmw‘um.

mam.

uanwmmum.nm

��~19.

tut Oil. innﬁltution urn vniulruhla ‘u individual dittorunaai
among

uxaainera.)
uwdﬂﬂﬂh‘b an“ “it

Tabla

ﬁttings at inﬁrOth
neat variad in tornat uad antltl.
MIR

#3:

triptrtit¢

Yb: diaahtrmc

with a toynrtta cvtlnntion

aburnctaralugi¢nl and buhnvtoral changnt.

it wan dattianlt

tar

rating at
toc&amp;31,

3R and name had

cltbnl ratings in

which

tribution at

taator a: th‘ ﬂdngiaaar ﬁrst.» (tabla II).

Glen

ﬁn

sauna: the

awnw

In? than atndy tbs ntnuingar Iyndroun rnﬁang was nuad for par»
paamt

a: uauptrinun.
fable
.U.-”Q””Wﬁ&amp;u

2. ageia a anal» {at} virinblas
3)

ﬂow

n1 Elana:

that:

was

t

mnrkoé

airturanco in thu

�~16»

cahisaphrtnta) raeqivaa dtluhirnt rgtiuam at unimprﬁvud
lawn

titan than puttuai: ricosvtn:

Iﬁ ﬂurn‘icn

ox

payihnthnrupy ulﬁuc.

h3upitn11:ut£on. putiantu rtaaivinc uamnatn

ihhruyr warn hacpttalitod tar 1011:: partndi

ﬁhnn

that.

rtontvinc othtr ﬁhirapiau‘
canatdcrubiu alts-rw

Catt. at».

ﬁhtﬁ‘hOQwﬁﬂﬁ

the thrnu inasitutlunu with r¢nvact

in putsuut’u Ina‘th u! Uta: (Tibia VI). urn pattnaia
houyltulinud tonguut. with éﬁﬁ

tuttvt

unathn

aw

aura, casparnd

pniaautn and «n1: 5 pi! aunt

tiny at an.

a: pattoutl

t;

ramuiuing (or

3: par can‘ at th¢ an

at ihiiﬁ at Inna. 2k: unﬁt!

an group an: autumn»

Ii?in

whit. twanthirdl of thc vane pattcntn

'18 ninth!

wuru

and GllVIh

ninth:

worn «inahavcud within

I! httpttﬂliﬁitﬁlnw

&amp;i K?! :nd an

lli

«at tho inuial‘r:otor utus elatily

vtlntta ‘0 luacth or haunt‘nltuatiol
rtuuiainc tar sh. toauaut purine;

It

..

ﬁa‘iouiu
yuingar

ovary use lcvut,

�I.
Winn

ttruaiurc at thu hmnpt‘nl
isnuvud

a...
is ﬂak.» It! uranﬁtd.

rcpar‘tu; itudtin Iran a

ii

nautxuaua

in¢titutiau

1h» autumn

brlitxv. ﬁnntvnr,

and I3QOHﬁﬂiﬁi

and: aunrt a:

ﬁnd

inntitutaun.
“ad

tam

titan!

3n studying a atwtnun

ta cutuar nanpnrahia data an.

an

nun: dirzurananu butwaﬁn instituhtaaa.

a! an. gutpxtnl argumiustzan

twanmnn «no

a: sh:

naihudoiiuin prdhlqua ﬁrtuoiana trnaiucntﬁ tar nuanpln,
bath

tit

auaa and urn

mat. At suns tun

at

hiVO day

an

«at:

it:

hacpital,

and 1a ‘hc nttar~¢uru

Iu.nauh a ti‘ﬁlﬁﬁ. ht as; tau! Iran in diﬂﬂhlrsi

sh: Fattunt {run

8%.

hllﬂhﬂl ﬁt an chatter unﬁt, Running

£hat to «111 with; be ramrauathiu
wharcat

unlit, ﬂﬁill

ttu.i£nc phyciatmu a‘n «at. far I yutxdat

an innpattcut, an 933

n11»&amp;a.

haugﬁ‘al

at an. dtﬂahnrca

dun‘nr r01&amp;t10n;&amp;19.

manna

tar hi; putaont‘n,nnr¢;

turuaunstan_¢£ shat pn‘iuntn

�dc»
cu
hon,
a'mu
wanted
an
my
mm.
min»
pun-sonata
on ohm“ u «a.

�£03"

£in
2:?

artootod the colltction and organisttton 0: ‘ho dutn.\ﬁﬁQﬁgﬁ~
Spacitic problcnn were uotnd 1n dociguntiano a: typo or

1

L}!

7p”;

011/”

'rﬂt

“’

Wm Mt

qﬂ’

U

9/

ﬂ:;;pg{§‘
W

54?”

Vlﬂ”

//

‘

\
Q

”uncut, (lunatic tom
antenna

and

«autumn: train.“

a) Dootgnntion or 322. o: rrcttntut: rho criterig tor
dalignntin; that n patioat rocutvad 'puyohathtrtpy' dartorod
Ilbﬁﬂ tho instituttoal, ﬁshing unttornity in claalttienttun

difficult.

At HIE payohothorupy can designated as

ilturod

trc;;noat

ndm1n~

procertpttan btllu by a otntt paychiutrict,
for which tun pationt wan chargcd t I... Stadium. wi‘h
in. puychtatrie rolid¢at wort Ionatdorod part of routtuo
Idninistrntivu patina: cure.
xx
it paythothorapy val defined at transient nautical
with thu psychiatric recidont. Stat: paychintrista did not
trutt paticnta, but rtatriétcd thotr no£1v1ttul to auporvtstac
tht ruaidcat physicianl.
At the lane psychathornpy was donixnttod u. 1 function
0! many disciplinol .. pljchlltrie runtdontl, pnyoholoututo.
loclnl nurture, nurses and :ndtc;1 studonta. Furnnl record:
or Inch caution. var. not routincly includnd 1n the pt‘tcnt'c
rcoord and to ‘lccrtuin which pationtc rcccivcd psychotherapy,
the resident 1n «Egret or ouch ctno van intervicwed.
b) an noun Individual Institution}. Guano-tn
Itylou Illa and. saupnriaona difficult. At urn dilohurco
on a

�Wmuummﬁmwmmummm.
wmmmmmummm.nuﬂ$d
Mmrwhﬂwmgwm.mwnmmt
ummmmmmmswmwmamwm
watchmen.

mwmammm’m'm

Wammmuwm.
: nmmm,mmm
a)

'

m

mWﬁWﬂmﬂWu”W’M-ﬂ).
mmtuWﬂmvtnmp-mmmm
’W‘wmmﬂ“. ‘mwma*m'
&gt;

M

mmw‘m(ﬂ)mme-ww*
(M)mmummmmum.
‘

’

a)

mammummm.mm

«Mammary WWW“
mummmmwmmwmu

�H.

v.

vw&lt;_~——va‘

&lt;vwvwv

ﬂw—w—v__ﬁ,

_.

mum

mmewWa-ww

,‘
mumwmarmmmm.
MMWmmmmmu-nmum

mmmmmmhmm
mwummmmxtmwmmh"
m

Mum,wuwmwmw~.

mummwumwwhn

“mammary“. mwmamm‘
y‘auquuwnv’wu‘ummwnm
muwmvmmmmmmmm
(nJNMummwn-uunmm ”mu
mmuuWMwW,ubmm

�.5.

pm»

amu-

mm“... mamas mun: “was“ and

nttivo yrucrtnt a: asliam thirnpy. Inch ntronsut tutti»

tits

tr‘atmuut a: mutuntary'p;taontu, 400i nut privtda auto

twain! aura «an iduda ‘0 ﬁrdw

staliar tea

1%:

pntiiat4pavu1$tian tram

arouwu.

ﬁn: primary r‘acan Iv? nﬁluatiux thy inntatatxtnc.
haumvur,

In:

1» Sb.

«spautntian ﬁhut hair vuuxa nurvu p‘ttoaaa

at ﬁiztarina loaiai GIIIIIG (an. 5;) «at that aattivuuaau

tut:

ﬁsmanaxau

1a

ﬂthlé ha rﬁtioaiaﬂ in ﬂat ﬁraainant vattdbinu.

2h: upauixia purpaua a! ths‘ mind: in; te doﬁtruinu‘popamaa

m3:
m
mutwm
um»
an autumn ”hm m»

it

Ulﬁlﬂl mind», «an, aduauiiun and

thaag pniiaas charaatnrxatauu

ﬁt

it

r

ﬁt:

accru. ﬁnd to rulu‘u

zr*u®auut Virtublun

at

a: «ﬁtment, amiss.” a: mp-zuuumm, Manna: “a"

¢&amp;uuhnrss-nvn!u:stan.

�W1
01“.

m

1.
a.

~

31!
51

,

E

J.

17

t
am

20

h.

3.

SI:

13

38

29

5

38

3”

15$

5?

so

53

:1

23

33

413

I)!

32‘

515

18-915

53

51

M

16 0

23

1?

10

10—29

51$

M9

”S

M

In.

50

38

5&amp;1“?

a

18

ha

195

£21!

fan

i

'

5.

of
“ICON.“

80

;

.&gt;

u-

5

M3!

E
ﬂ

m”

he

4,

~

'

:'*13I:§
‘

«a
9".”‘
1“

31-3

9

”‘03::

at"

.1

it'We”

it”$001

“it" 90.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2904">
                <text>Social aspects of psychiatric treatment in three hospitals: methodological problems. VA Cooperative Studies in Psychiatry, 6:202-6.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2905">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2906">
                <text>mfp-02-01-004-59-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2907">
                <text>1961</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2908">
                <text>Pollack, Max; Siegel, Nathaniel; Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2909">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2910">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2911">
                <text>9 items. 1: Photocopy of publication with Q &amp; A. 2: [preprint]. 3: Draft. 4: The Identification of Patient Populations: Comparability of Subjects in Evaluating Therapies Among Institutions by Max Fink, M.D. 5: The American Psychoanalytic Association Summary and FInal Report of Central Fact-Gathering Committee. 6: Correspondence. 7: Handwritten notes. 8: Social Class. Diagnosis, and treatment In Three Psychiatric Hospitals. 9: Research, drafts, and letters.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2912">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2913">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74493">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81054">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87615">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94176">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="231" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="22">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/159923c8867e9781f49e8300e7f3e2d3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>560d0723c8cbc5298ad5e04e592ff291</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100648">
                    <text>0

Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry
October 1952, Vol. 68, pp. 481-490
Copyright, 1952, by American Medical Association

EXOSOMESTHESIA OR DISPLACEMENT OF CUTANEOUS SENSATION
INTO EXTRAPERSONAL SPACE
MORTIMER F. SHAPIRO, M.D.
MAX FINK, MD.
AND

MORRIS B. BENDER, M.D.
NEW YORK

MONG phenomena that may be apparent during examination of patients with
disease of the sensory pathways is mislocalization of a sensory stimulus. It
has long been known that a person with a sensory defect, as seen in the common
varieties of cerebral hemiplegia, may inaccurately localize stimuli applied on the

paretic side.
Such point mislocalizations are apparent in examinations using a single stimulus
and have been described in detail by Head} These mislocalizations can be accentu—
ated by the use of double simultaneous stimulation techniques.2 In addition, when
these techniques of examination are employed, other varieties of mislocalization,
such as displacement,3 become apparent. Displacement is the patterned mislocali—
zation of one of two stimuli simultaneously applied to different body areas. The
direction of displacement is in a deﬁnite pattern, which is dependent upon the parts
of the body stimulated.
Characteristic of mislocalization so far reported has been the fact that their extent
was within the limits of the patient’s body. In the course of studies of cutaneous
perception, we observed a new form of displacement in which the patient consistently
and in a predictable fashion mislocalized stimuli into extrapersonal space. This type
of displacement we have termed “exosomesthesia.” 4
Exosomesthesia is not a commonly observed phenomenon. More than 400
patients with brain disease were examined at Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue
Aided by a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (Dr. Fink).
This investigation was supported in part by research grant #MH-139 from the United States
Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health.
From the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University College of
Medicine, and the Neurological Service of the Mount Sinai Hospital and Bellevue Hospital
Center.
1. Head, H.: Studies in Neurology, London, Oxford University Press, 1920, Vol. 2.
2. Bender, M. B.; Shapiro, M. F., and Schappell, A. W.: Extinction Phenomenon in
Hemiplegia, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 62:717-724 (Dec) 1949. Bender, M. B.; The Advantages
of the Method of Simultaneous Stimulation in the Neurological Examination, M. Clin. North
America 32:755-758 (May) 1948.
3. Bender, M. B.; The Phenomenon of Sensory Displacement, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp;
Psychiat. 65:607-621 (May) 1951.
4. The term was derived by Dr. Judah A. Joffe (Hinsie, L. E., and Shatzky, J.: Psychiatric
Dictionary, New York, Oxford University Press, 1940) from the Greek 55w, out of; will“,
body, and 41709710”, perception by the senses.

�2
7

Hospital Center by routine and specialized sensory tests. Exosomesthesia was
observed in only 15 cases, an incidence of about 3%.5 The following case reports
illustrate the phenomenon and demonstrate some of the conditions under which it
was observed.
CASE REPORTS
CASE 1.—H. M.,

a man aged 64, was admitted to the Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue Hospital with a history of progressive mental changes of six years’ duration. The ﬁrst four years
of illness were marked by slowly progressive impairment of memory, concentration, and other
intellectual functions and by increasing apathy to his' environment. In the last two years there
was rapid exacerbation of this condition, resulting in the loss of his job as a store manager.
During this period his speech became increasingly garbled and stammering. He vacillated
between irritability and complete apathy. He was occasionally incontinent, ceased bathing, had
difﬁculty in dressing, and was sometimes so forgetful and confused as to wander into the street
without his trousers.
Routine Neurologic Examination—In walking, the trunk was tilted to the right, and there
was a tendency to drag the right lower extremity. However, there was no signiﬁcant motor
weakness, reﬂex change, or tonus abnormality. Coordination tests were well performed. The
cranial nerve functions were intact. Vibration sense was correctly perceived only in the
clavicles and the head, while position sense was lost in the ﬁngers, wrists, toes, and ankles
bilaterally. Temperature differences were poorly perceived except in the face area. His responses
to touch and pinprick stimulation will be described later. A mild degree of “mixed aphasia” was
present. This speech difﬁculty was evident only by special testing or when the patient was
fatigued by prolonged examination. There was a ﬂuctuating dyspraxia of moderate severity.
Occasionally he had difﬁculty in dressing, being unable to handle buttons and sleeves. However, he could perform such functions as feeding himself, combing his hair, and other routine
daily tasks. He was usually unable to mimic the more complicated patterns of the hand-praxis
tests.
An electroencephalogram showed bilateral diffuse abnormality, with decrease in amplitude
and intermittent suppression of activity over the parietal regions. A pneumoencephalogram disclosed bilaterally dilated ventricles and moderate “cortical atrophy,” particularly in the left
temporal lobe.
Psychiatric Status—Although the patient was oriented for place and situation, he made
errors as to date and time of day. There were defects in recent memory, concentration,
calculation, and ability to assume the abstract attitude. He usually sat placidly staring into
space or wandered aimlessly about the ward. He did not mix with other patients. When
approached by members of the staff, he was friendly and passively cooperative. Testing procedures were approached with cheerful indifference. When, however, he was pushed into test
situations greater than his capacity, he reacted with increasing irritability and tension, eventually
culminating in a “catastrophic reaction.” At such times he would become red in the face, shout
that he knew the answers but did not want to continue, and suddenly begin to weep.
Body Schema—He was able to distinguish the right side of his body from the left, but was
unable to make this distinction on the examiner’s body. He had no difﬁculty either in locating
midline structures of his body, such as the nose, mouth, chin, umbilicus, and penis, or in pointing
to his eyes. With eyes open he readily found both ears; but when his eyes were closed he groped
about his face for several seconds before locating them. He could point to his thighs, knees,
ankles, and toes but could not point to any speciﬁc toe other than the big toe.
He frequently had diﬂiculty in locating portions of his upper extremities. If asked to point to
his shoulders, he correctly located one shoulder but then groped behind his neck looking for
the other. This defect was even more noticeable in trying to ﬁnd the “other” elbow and wrist,
and greatest in trying to ﬁnd the “other” hand. His search for the “other” hand or wrist was
bizarre. He would look under the pillow or rummage under the mattress, becoming tense and
Fink, M.; Green, M., and Bender, M. B.: The Face-Hand Test as a Diagnostic Sign
of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurology 2:46-58 (Jan-Feb.) 1952.
5.

�3

insisting it was lost. It should be emphasized that, despite the great difﬁculty in locating parts
of his body, the patient was able to name the body parts, except the ﬁngers and toes. This was
true whether the part pointed to was on the patient’s or on the examiner’s body.
Sensory Status—(w) Single Stimulation: He had difﬁculty in differentiating between the
sharp and the dull end of a pin. This defect was present throughout the body, although he made
signiﬁcantly fewer errors in the face and hands. Touch stimulation was poorly perceived.
Usually he could not state whether or not he had been t0uched. Again, there seemed to be
relatively better preservation of this modality in the hands and face.
Except under special conditions of examination of the hands, to be described later, the
patient was able to locate the site of a pinprick by pointing. However, if the pin was repetitively
and rapidly applied to one region, or if the prick was steadily maintained at that one place, he
could not locate the point of stimulation. He would make frantic, random searching movements
over his body, and not infrequently around the bedclothes, grimacing as though in pain and
exclaiming that he was trying to remove the pin. If asked where he was being pricked, he dis—
regarded the question and continued to try to remove the stimulus. This phenomenon occurred
on stimulation of any portion of the body but was most apparent when the hand was tested.
(b) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: The phenomena of extinction and displacement were
frequently observed in tests of different body areas by simultaneous tactile stimulation. On
stimulation of the face and hand, stimuli to the hand were not perceived or were mislocalized
to the cheek. In tests of homologous body areas (as hand-hand) extinction of one percept was
common. The side on which the stimulus was not perceived ﬂuctuated, so that at one moment
only a. right—sided stimulus was perceived and a few moments later only a left-sided stimulus
was perceived.

Exosomesthesia—Whenever his palm was in contact with a portion of his body or any other
object, and the dorsum of that hand was pricked with a pin, the patient consistently mislocalized
the stimulus. This mislocalization was to whatever object the palmar surface of the hand was
touching. For example, if the patient’s hand was resting on his thigh and the dorsum of the hand
was pricked, he insisted that the thigh had been touched, and not the hand. This mislocalization
—exosomesthesia—occurred to the thigh, abdomen, leg, or face and was present with stimuli
to either hand. It was observed even when the patient was urged to look at the hand during
the application of the pin. Exosomesthesia could not be elicited, however, by stimulation of the
palm or palmar surface of the ﬁngers when the dorsum of the hand was resting on a portion of
the body. Furthermore, localization of stimuli to the dorsum of the hand was correct if the hand
was held in space.

Mislocalization also occurred to objects external to his body. If his palm was resting on a
table or on his bed, and the dorsum of the hand was pricked with a pin, he would point to these
objects and state that the pin had been applied “there.” When questioned, he stated that the
hand had been touched but continued to point to the bed or table. Frequently, however, he
insisted that it was the bed or table that had been touched, and not his hand. If asked how he
could feel the bed being pricked with a pin, he would become tense, avoid the question, and
insist, “You touched the bed, not me.”
Displacement into extrapersonal space was not eliminated by simultaneous stimulation, even
when extinction of one of the percepts occurred. For example, if pins were simultaneously
applied to the dorsa of the hands while the palms were resting on a table, he would report
feeling only one pinprick, that on the left (or right, as dominance ﬂuctuated) and point to the
place where the left hand had been resting, saying. “You touched the bed there.”
This phenomenon of displacement into extrapersonal space occurred daily during a period
of more than two months.

C 0mment.——~In this patient a requisite to displacement into space was that the
palm of the hand be in contact with an external object. In other words, there were

two cutaneous stimuli simultaneously in operation, namely, the pinprick on the
dorsum of the hand and the pressure of the object in contact with the palm or
ﬁngers. A single stimulus, such as pricking the dorsum of a hand held in space, did
not elicit the displacement.

�4

Exosomesthesia was elicited only on stimulating the hands. This occurred even
though single pinprick was perceived more sharply in the hands than in any other
area except the face.
Although this patient showed inability to locate correctly parts of his own and
the examiner’s body, it does not necessarily mean that exosomesthesia is determined
by this particular type of disorder in body scheme. The following case illustrates
the phenomenon of exosomesthesia in the presence of the patient’s ability to locate
body parts.
2.—E. K., a woman aged 52, was admitted to the neurologic service of the Mount
Sinai Hospital in August, 1950, with a history of grand mal seizures. She had been in good
health until 1947, when there appeared sporadic, momentary sensations of “blacking out.” About
two years before admission she began to suffer monthly grand mal seizures. There was no aura.
Routine examination on admission showed that her status was within normal limits except
for anosmia in the right nostril. There was no organic mental syndrome. X-ray studies revealed
evidence of a subfrontal neoplasm. On August 12 a craniotomy was done, and after amputation
of a portion of the right frontal lobe, a large bilateral subfrontal meningioma was excised.
Her postoperative course was stormy. For two weeks she was semistuporous. She responded
only to massive, painful stimulation, and these responses were limited to vague, ineffective
attempts to push away the stimulus. In this period she lapsed several times into coma and
showed Cheyne-Stokes respiration. The Babinski response was obtained bilaterally. Her pupils
did not react to light.
From about Aug. 23, 1950, the patient improved slowly and steadily. She began to respond
verbally, and contact could be maintained for short periods. Vision, which had apparently been
absent, began to return, although right homonymous hemianopsia remained for some time. A
marked organic mental syndrome characterized by confusion, disorientation, and anosognosia,
was present.
Routine Neurologic Examination.——Neurologic examination in September, 1950, disclosed
right homonymous hemianopsia, severe impairment of visual acuity with bilateral secondary
optic nerve atrophy, nystagmus in all directions of gaze, a bilateral Babinski sign, and a mild
degree of aphasia. Position sense, vibration sense, and temperature perception were unimpaired.
There were difficulties in perception of touch and pinprick stimuli, as described below.
Psychiatric S'tattusr—The patient was usually friendly and cooperative. However, she was
frequently irritable and would not permit examination. She was disoriented as to time and
occasionally to situation, but not to place. There were defects in retention and recall, covered
by confabulation. She was euphoric and displayed little self-restraint or concern in social
situations. Usually she would lie with her body fully exposed. Not infrequently she soiled
herself or wet the bed. Anosovgnosia was prominent.
Body Schema—On command, the patient was able to identify and locate correctly parts of
her own and the examiner’s body, such as the ears, eyes, feet, and parts of the upper extremities.
She exhibited some confusion about the right and the left side of the body.
Sensory Status.—(a) Single Stimulation: The patient perceived single pinprick stimuli
well, although she made occasional nonpatterned errors in localization. These errors were more
frequent on the left side.
(b) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: On simultaneous application of pinprick to the two
sides of the body, except the hands, extinction on the left or displacement on the left toward the
level of the right—sided stimulus was the usual response. Homolateral simultaneous stimulation
on the right side of the body showed no extinction, but stimulation on the left side elicited
frequent extinction and displacement.
CASE

Exosomesthesia.—Displacement into extrapersonal space occurred when the left hand was
pricked at the same time that either the right hand or the right cheek was stimulated. The
phenomenon could also be elicited when the left hand and any other area of the left side of the
body were simultaneously stimulated.
Under these conditions the patient mislocalized the stimulus to the left hand into space
near that hand, or to the object on which the hand was lying. For example, if pinpricks were

�5

.

simultaneously applied to the right cheek and the left hand, the patient indicated she had been
pricked on the right cheek and the arm of the chair on which her left hand had been resting.
As a rule she answered by pointing. If asked to verbalize, she would say, “The right cheek and
about here,” (pointing to the chair arm or into space near her left hand). If asked directly.
“Was your hand touched?” she would avoid the question, responding only, “Here,” pointing
at the same time to the left chair arm or into space. It is to be noted that, except under the
special condition of simultaneous stimulation, the patient was always able to point to or to name
her left hand on demand.
If pricked simultaneously on the dorsa of the left and right hands, she correctly localized
only the stimulus on the right, both by pointing and by stating, “My right hand.” The stimulus
on the left, however, was localized only by pointing to the chair arm and saying, “Here.”
If asked whether the chair arm and not her left hand, had been touched, she answered, “No,
here,” pointing to the chair arm.
When pinpricks were applied to the left hand and, at the same time, to another area on the
left side of the body, a similar displacement into space was evident. Usually the stimulus to
the left hand was mislocalized onto whatever structure the hand was resting or else 'into
contiguous space. The other stimulus on the left side was usually correctly localized, though
this stimulus, too, was occasionally displaced into space. When this double displacement occurred,
the patient would state that she felt two stimuli and would point into space to the left of the
arm, stating, “Here and here.”
These mislocalizations were repeatedly observed during a period of a month and were not
always limited to the left side. They were occasionally observed to occur on the right side.
At these times localization on the left was always correct, as indicated by pointing and by
verbalization.

C omment.—Exosomesthesia was elicited in this patient only under the condition
of multiple simultaneous stimulation. It could not be elicited by single—stimulation
methods. Also signiﬁcant is the fact that exosomesthesia was apparent even though
there was no gross disorder in body scheme on routine testing. Furthermore, it is

evident that her errors in localization were not simply inability to point to or
identify parts of her body by name, as ordinarily she experienced no difﬁculty in
doing this. on command.
Both patients mislocalized percepts to parts of the body, to objects, or into
space contiguous with the area stimulated. Occasionally, we have also observed
displacement of a stimulus to the person of the examiner. Usually such percepts
are mislocalized to a homologous portion of the examiner’s body; e. g., a stimulus
applied to the patient’s hand is reported by him as though it had been applied to
the examiner’s hand. Rarely, the mislocalization is to any part of the examiner’s
body. This type of displacement is illustrated in the following case.
man aged 52, was admitted to the Psychiatric Pavilion of Bellevue
Hospital with the complaint that he had become confused and depressed. For about a year he
had been disoriented and confused as to date and his relationship to people and had wandered
about the city aimlessly. He had been admitted to the Farm Colony about a half-year before
and had worked as a barber until the week before his admission to the hospital.
Routine N emologic Examimtion.—Neurologic examination showed normal gait and station.
Coordination tests were well performed. The reﬂexes were active bilaterally, with normal
plantar and abdominal responses. Cranial nerve functions were normal. The sensory status
showed changes, but only with special methods of testing. A pneumoencephalogram demonstrated
moderately dilated ventricles, without shift or deformity, and some dilated cerebral sulci.
Psychiatric Status—A severe organic mental syndrome was evident. In the ward he sat
quietly for hours by his bedside, taking little interest in his surroundings. When approached
by members of the staff, he appeared perplexed but was affable. During the testing procedures
he was cooperative unless confronted by a test situation in which the examiner demanded tasks
CASE 3.—-R. M., a

‘

�6
‘

beyond his ability. At such times he showed a “catastrophic” reaction, became excited, and
discontinued his efforts in the examination.
He was disoriented for time, place, and situation. However, he was able to ﬁnd his way about
the ward, locating his bed, the nurses’ desk, the doctor’s ofﬁce, and the lavatory. Severe diﬂiculties in intellectual function were observed. He was unable to give an adequate history.
He could not recall the examiner’s name or the events of several hours before but did not
confabulate. Calculation and symbol—identiﬁcation tests were poorly performed.
Severe aphasic difﬁculties Were evident. He was unable to name common objects, clothing,
or most parts of the body. He could not comprehend written commands, nor could he write,
but he was able to follow simple verbal commands.
Mild dyspraxia was demonstrated in his attempts to imitate ﬁnger and mouth movements.
However, he was able to dress, feed, and otherwise care for himself.
Body Image.—He had difﬁculty both in naming body parts and in locating them by pointing.
The defects were severest in the ﬁngers, wrists, and elbows, and occasionally the feet. There
was difficulty in right-left orientation.
Sensory Status—(a) Single Stimulation: Routine sensory studies of touch, pinprick, and
vibration stimuli showed no consistent impairment. These stimuli were usually correctly
localized and described. Occasionally a single stimulus to the hand or forearm was displaced
to a contiguous object or to space about the upper extremity.
(b) Double Simultaneous Stimulation: On double simultaneous [touch] stimulation the
patient displayed extinction and displacement of tactile stimuli. This was most evident in trials of
the face—hand test 6 but was seen in tests of other body parts as well. For example, on simultaneous stimulation of the cheek and the opposite hand, he would either report only the stimulus
to the cheek (extinction of the hand stimulus) or report a stimulus to each cheek (displacement
of the hand stimulus). The pattern of sensory dominance was that usually seen in diffuse
cerebral disease, the face being most dominant, the hand least.5 There was no lateral dominance.
Exosolm-esthesriav.—Displacement into extrapersonal space was occasionally observed on single
stimulation. This displacement was from the hand, forearm, or elbow to space contiguous to
the part touched. Exosomesthesia was, however, markedly exaggerated when double simul—
taneous stimulation was employed. Again, the areas from which the phenomenon was most
frequently observed were the hands, forearms, and elbows. For example, when stimuli were
applied to the dorsa of the hands as they were lying on the patient’s lap, he pointed to space
in front of his knees. If asked to state where he had been touched, he would say, “The hands,”
but would continue to point to the space in front of his knees. Exosomesthesia was rarely
noted when other body parts, such as the cheeks or shoulders, were simultaneously stimulated.
Occasionally it was found that on tests with double simultaneous stimulation the patient
mislocalized a stimulus from his body to the homologous region of the examiner’s body. For
instance, when the hands were simultaneously touched, he would grasp the examiner’s hands
and affirm he had been touched “there.” Despite the examiner’s insistence that the stimulus
had been to the patient’s hands, the patient would persist in pointing to the examiner’s hands.
When asked to name the parts touched, he would say “There, there.” The same phenomenon
was occasionally observed on simultaneous stimulation of the two elbOWS or cheeks. It was
signiﬁcant that this mislocalization to the examiner’s body occurred even when the patient was
urged to look at the stimulations.
It was observed that emotional tension, increase in the rate of testing or undue prolongation
of the examination increased the incidence of exosomesthesia. For example, to initial application
of pinprick to the right hand and the left cheek, the patient reported only the face percept,
omitting the hand stimulus. Later, he localized the two stimuli to the cheeks. As the examination
progressed and the physician speeded up the testing, the patient became tenser. He then localized
the face percept correctly but insisted that the hand stimulation was into space in front of the
hand. Finally, both stimuli were displaced into space or to the examiner’s body.
These phenomena were observed daily over a period of 2% months.
.

Bender, M. B.; Fink, M., and Green, M.: Patterns in Perception on Simultaneous Tests
of Face and Hand, Tr. Am. Neurol. A. 75:250-252 (June) 1950; Patterns in Perception on
Simultaneous Tests of Face and Hand, A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 66:35‘5-262
6.

(Sept)

1951.

�7

Comment—While single stimulation occasionally produced exosomesthesia in
this patient, the phenomenon was more pronounced under conditions of double
simultaneous stimulation. This patient also mislocalized stimuli to the examiner’s
body. Emotional tension, prolonged examination, or increase in the rate of testing
exaggerated the phenomenon of exosomesthesia.
GENERAL COMMENT

On consideration of these cases, it is immediately apparent that exosomesthesia
is associated with a severe organic mental syndrome. Therefore, it might be
argued
that exosomesthesia is merely a manifestation of the patient’s mental confusion;
that the patient simply points into space because he is confused. However, we have
examined many severely confused patients and found exosomesthesia only rarely.
Moreover, exosomesthesia is a patterned phenomenon, demonstrable in each patient
under deﬁned conditions, predictable as to the area from which it will occur and the
extrapersonal spatial region to which the sensation will be projected. For example,
in Case 1 exosomesthesia could be elicited only from the hand, and only when the
dorsum was stimulated at the same time that the palm or ﬁngers were in contact
with another object. Displacement under these circumstances was usually not
haphazard. As a rule it occurred to the object touching the palm or ﬁngers. In
Case 2 exosomesthesia could be elicited only by double simultaneous stimulation.
It was seen most clearly in the hand and could be elicited only unilaterally at any one
examination. Again, the displacement was not haphazard; the stimulus as a rule
was localized to extrapersonal space contiguous to the area actually stimulated. In
Case 3 the phenomenon was observed again under conditions of double simultaneous
stimulation, and the displacements were either to space contiguous to the stimulated
area or to homologous areas of the examiner’s body. It is signiﬁcant that these
displacements could be elicited even when the patient was urged to look at the
application of the stimuli. Moreover, even when the examiner pointed out the error
in localization and emphasized the implausibility of the
response, the patient characteristically insisted on the correctness of the mislocalization.
Factors Inﬂnencing Exosoimesthesiax—Many factors inﬂuence the appearance
of exosomesthesia. Except in children under special conditions, it has been observed
exclusively in patients with severe mental changes resulting from disease of the
brain. It is inﬂuenced by the type of stimulus used and the rate of stimulation,
as
well as by the element of simultaneity of stimuli. Moreover, the emotional
state of
the patient has a signiﬁcant effect on the phenomenon, as does the
part of the body
stimulated. In some cases exosomesthesia has been made apparent by administration
of small doses of amobarbital sodium. These factors will be discussed.
(a) Bilateral Cerebral Disease: The symptom background in every case of
exosomesthesia is an organic mental syndrome secondary to bilateral cerebral
disease. We have not been able to demonstrate exosomesthesia in
an adult unless
there were severe mental changes. But, as previously noted, it is a rare phenomenon,
and only a few patients with severe organic mental syndrome show it. In 400
patients with organic cerebral disease, of varying severity, exosomesthesia was
observed in approximately 3%.5 Even in these patients it was not manifest in
every
examination, and its frequency was readily altered by changes in the conditions of
testing. It is therefore evident that severe bilateral cerebral disease in itself is
not sufﬁcient to produce exosomesthesia.

�8

That simultaneous stimulation may elicit
sensory phenomena not apparent on single stimulation has previously been demonstrated.2 For example, a hemisensory syndrome in a hemiplegic patient may not be
discernible except under conditions of double simultaneous stimulation. Thus, single
stimulation may be well perceived and localized by the patient, but the addition of
a second stimulus simultaneously applied may so affect integration that the phenomena of extinction, obscuration, and displacement become apparent.
Similarly, simultaneous stimulation elicited exosomesthesia when it was absent
on single-stimulus examination, or exaggerated it when it was occasionally manifest
on routine stimulation. In Cases 1 and 2 simultaneous stimulation was a necessary
condition for eliciting the phenomenon. It could not be demonstrated by single
stimulation. In Case 3 exosomesthesia could occasionally be elicited on single stimulation, but with simultaneous stimulation the phenomenon was demonstrated with
much greater frequency.
(c) Type of Stimulus Most Effective: Of the various stimuli used in these
examinations, such as single touch, single pinprick, repetitive touch, and repetitive
pinprick, it was noted that repetitive touch stimuli were most effective in eliciting
exosomesthesia. This was especially true on double simultaneous stimulation.
(d) Effect of the Patient’s Emotional State: Exosomesthesia was exaggerated
by alterations in the test situation which made performances more difﬁcult. Increasing the rate of stimulation or unduly prolonging the examination increased the displacements to extrapersonal space. If the examiner was deliberately critical of the
patient’s errors, the phenomenon also appeared with greater frequency. These
factors increased the emotional tension of the patient and if carried further produced
a “catastrophic” reaction.
(e) Effect of Drugs: It has previously been demonstrated that difﬁculties in
perception may be exaggerated by barbiturate intoxicants.5 Amobarbital sodium
was administered intravenously in doses of 3 to 7 grains (0.2 to 0.45 gm.) to
patients with diffuse cerebral disease. Prior to administration of the drug, these
patients manifested the phenomena of extinction and displacement of percepts on
simultaneous tests, but not exosomesthesia. While under the inﬂuence of the barbiturate, three patients showed exosomesthesia, in addition to extinction and displacement. In two other patients, in whom exosomesthesia had been elicited only
after a protracted testing period, the administration of amobarbital sodium elicited
exosomesthesia at the onset of testing and exaggerated the phenomena of extinction
(2)) Effect of Simultaneous Stimuli:

and displacement.
Relation of Exo'somest‘hesia to: Extinction, Obscumtioln, and Displacement—In
our experience, whenever exosomesthesia has been observed, the phenomena of
extinction, obscuration, and displacement are also present. Exosomesthesia, how—
ever, is a rare phenomenon, whereas extinction, obscuration, and displacement are
commonly observed. Moreover, whereas extinction, obscuration, and displacement
are frequently seen in adult patients with mild cerebral dysfunction,5 displacement
into extrapersonal space is present only in cases of severe mental changes due to
disease of the brain. It may therefore be concluded that exosomesthesia in adults
represents a severer type of cerebral dysfunction than other simultaneous stimulation
phenomena.

�9

Relation of Exosomes'th‘esia; to Body I mage.——It might be said that exosomesthesia is a pathologic extension of the body image. The normal person is continually
extending the boundaries of this image. For example, Head cites the examples of
the woman with a feather in her hat who “feels” when the feather is touched, and
the surgeon who handles his probe as though it were an extension. of his ﬁngers.1
In the normal person, however, these extensions of the body image are ﬂuid,
immediately reversible, and clearly recognized by the subject as artiﬁcial. The
surgeon, for example, is able at any moment to redeﬁne correctly his body image.
He “knows” that the probe is not his ﬁnger. In the group of patients described
above, however, the extension of the body image seems to operate in a pathologic,
rigid form. Under certain conditions these patients lose the ability to maintain a
realistic deﬁnition of the limits of their body. They behave as though portions of the
contiguous external world are concretely incorporated into the inner image of their
body’s extent.
Although we may consider exosomestheisa as a specialized body-image disturbance, it should be noted that patients who do not show difﬁculties in identiﬁcation
and location of body parts still may show mislocalization into extrapersonal space.
On the other hand, patients with an inability to identify or locate their body parts
on command do not necessarily manifest exosomesthesia.
In similar fashion, there is no necessary relationship between exosomesthesia and
position-sense difﬁculties. A patient (Case 3) who manifested displacement of
sensation into extrapersonal space did not make errors in routine tests of position
sense in the extremities. This is consistent with observations previously made by
Head1 that localization of single stimuli is not functionally related to sense of
position of the extremities.
Role of the Hand—Although displacement into extrapersonal space has been
elicited from various areas of the body, it has been observed to occur most frequently
from the hand. Moreover, in no case has it been elicited from another area and been
absent from the hand.
This predilection for the hand is consistent with the manner in which other
dysfunctions of the nervous system are reﬂected. As a rule, when the functioning
of one side of the body is impaired through cerebral disease, the disorder is most
manifest in the hand. Thus, in the usual hemiplegia resulting from a capsular lesion
the paresis, body-image disturbance, and sensory loss are most prominent in the
hand and ﬁngers.
In these patients, and in others with diffuse cerebral disease, the phenomena of
extinction, obscuration, and displacement are also best elicited when the hand is
tested. Furthermore, studies of the order of sensory dominance of various areas
of the body demonstrate that the hand is in the lowest rank. This is true of the
dominance order of patients with cerebral disease,5 and also of normal subjects,
both adults and children.6
Similarly, when allesthesia is observed, it is seen most clearly in the hand. Bender and Nathanson 7 described a case in which the clinical course was reﬂected in a
Bender, M. B., and Nathanson, M.: Patterns in Allesthesia and Their Relation to Disorder of Body Scheme and Other Sensory Phenomena, Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 64:501-515
7.

(Oct)

1950.

‘

�10

waxing and waning allesthesia. As this patient improved, the areas from which the
phenomenon could be elicited diminished, until ﬁnally allesthesia was demonstrable
only in the hand.
In autotopagnosia the hands are more profoundly affected than other regions.
Finger agnosia, possibly the earliest sign of body-image disturbance, is frequently
seen in the absence of other gross disturbances of the body schema. Furthermore,
phantom limb, anosognosia, causalgia, and synesthesia are phenomena in which the
role of the hand is especially prominent.
Just as these pathologic phenomena are manifest in tests of other body parts, but
are most clearly demonstrable in the hand, so, too, exosomesthesia, though occasionally demonstrable elsewhere, is most apparent in examination of the functions of the
hand.
Exosomesthesia in the N ormal C hild.—It has been observed that sensory phenomena which occur in patients with cerebral dysfunction may be found in the nor—
mal young child.6 Similarly, exosomesthesia, which we have never found in adults
except when there is severe cerebral disease, can be readily observed in children
up to the age of 4 years. In examination of a large series of normal children it was
noted that the initial responses of children to double simultaneous stimulation fre—
quently included exosomesthesia, although the commoner responses were extinction
and displacement. Exosomesthesia was rare, however, after the initial few trials.
The frequency with which exosomesthesia may be seen in children up to the age
of 4 years suggests that it may represent, in the child, a “normal” developmental
stage in the organization of perception. Its appearance in adults with severe brain
disease may possibly be, as with other pathologic phenomena, a regression in function to a previous level of sensory integration.
SUMMARY

,

The patterned mislocalization of tactile stimuli into extrapersonal space is
described and termed exosomesthesia.
Exosomesthesia is observed in patients with severe organic mental syndromes.
It is apparent only rarely on single tactile stimulation and is more readily elicited by
the technique of double simultaneous stimulation. It is exaggerated by fatigue,
rapid testing, and increased emotional tension. Barbiturate intoxication also may
elicit or exaggerate the phenomenon.
Exosomesthesia is most apparent in stimulation of the hand but has been observed
in tests of other body parts. While it may be considered a pathologic extension of
the body image, it is not dependent upon concomitant body-image disturbances.
Although exosomesthesia has been observed chieﬂy in patients with severe mental changes, it is not a manifestation of confusion, but is a patterned, predictable
phenomenon. It may be a regression, in patients with cerebral dysfunction, to a
previously “normal” stage in sensory development, as suggested by the fact that it is
readily observed in simultaneous tactile tests of young children.

Printed and Published in the United States of America

�EXOBOMIBTHIBIA OR

DIEPLkGIIIIT 0P OBTlﬂlﬂﬂs

83N3£TIOIIINQO EantuflRSOIAL BPACE‘
EV

Martino:- F. Shapiro.

am.

an: Fink, K.D.'*
and

Kerri:

B. Bender, H.D.

.,

" "i 3”“
a"?
,y.
Univcruity College or’ncdieiuc and tn. 3 enrol 651331 Service of
thc Haunt ﬂinﬁi ﬁclpital Ind lollcvuo ﬁbﬂpitﬂl, I0! Yer! 0131.
'Dntdod by a ﬂullaulhip tram thy lationnl roundntion for Infantile
QJ‘

V‘W‘

,

g

j

,

‘9ar111510.

ibis investigltion in. lupportod, in partin:by a rouonroh grant
stutt- Public not ammo. mum
or ﬁanlth.

aun-139 tram tho unit.d

Inltitutel

ﬂ

�Among phenomena bbeb new

be epperenb during exe-inebion or

petienbe eith dieeeee or the eeneory pebbueye is nielooelisebion

It

individual
with e eeneory defeat, on eeen in the cannon vuriebiee or cerebrel
beniplegie, any looeiioe ineoonrebely ebiuuli applied on the
of e eeneory etienioo.

bee long been known

that

on

‘

perebio bide.

point nielooelieebiono ere epperenb in exelinetionl
ueing e eingie ebiunlue, end have been deeoribedbin detail by Hood
(1). These nationalisation: can be eooentuobed/b‘e uee or double
Snob

einnlbeneoue obi-ulebion techniques (2).- In eddidon, when theee
technique. of exeninetion Ire enployed, other veriebiee or

nielooeiieetion,-euob ee diepieoenent (3). become apparent.
niepleoe-nnb ie the petberned nielooelieebion or one or two ebinnli
eiunlbeneouely applied to different body areas. The direction or
diepleoeuent ie in e definite pattern, which is dependent upon the
parts or the body Ibilnleted.
choreoterietio of nieiooelieetion on for reported bee been
‘

tho fact bhet their lxtent VII uibbin the lilibl of the patient’l
body. In the oouree or obodiee or outeneoue peroeption we obeerved
I new torn or diepleoenent in which the patient oonoietenbiy end in
e prediobeble reebion nielooelieel obi-n11 into extra-pereonei epeoe.
Thin type of diepieoenont on have teamed “exoeo-oebheeie'.¢
of the
derived by Dr. Judeh A. Jotte, Editor
19%0,
the
tron
Press.
Oxford
Boivereity
reyobietrio biotic: none",
,
by
”eiotheeie”,
perception
body;
the
Greek "one", out or;
139

FI?’!53'€5§E
eeneee.

wee

ll;

Exoeoleebbeeie ie not e commonly oboerved phenomenon.
more than #00 patient: with brain dieeeee were examined at Bellevue
Peyobietrio Hoopibel by routine end epeoielieed eeneory beete.

�2.
Shoeoneetheeie wee obeerved in only 15 oeeee ~ en incidence of
ebout 3! (5). who following oeee reporte illustrete the phehoaenon
end deoonetrete eoee o: the oonditione ﬁnder which it wee obeerved.
Case 15 H.I., e 6% year old male, wee admitted to Bellevoe

Peyohietrio noepitel with e hietory or progreeeive sentel cheeses
or eix years doretion. The firet tour yeere or illneee were lurked
by eloely progreeeive ilpeirnent of memory, oonoentretion end other
intellectual funotione. end inoreeeing epeth: to hie environnent

la the leet teo

ii

yeere thie oondition exacerbated rapidly, reeulting

the lone of hie Job ee e etore neneser. During thie period hie
epeeoh bean-e inoreeeingly serbled end Ito-nerihg, Be veeoilleted

oolplete epethy.i. 1*: f”;irTWT€nL. he
wee oooeeionelly incontinent. mm bathing; nee dittioulty in
dreeeing, end wee eoneti-ee eo forgetful end oonrueed ee to wander
into the etteet eithout hie troueere.
Routine georologio Ian-ioetion; In welkins the trunk wee
tilted to the right end there wee e tendency to drag the right,
lower extreaity. However, there wee no eignitioent motor weekneee.
reflex change or tonne ebnor-elity. Coordination teete were well
perromned. The oreniel nerve function: were intact. Vibretion
eenee wee correctly perceived only in the oleviolee end the heed,
while poeition eenee wee lost in the tinsere, eriete, toee end
enklee bilaterally. Temperature difference: were poorly peroeived
exoept in the teoe.eree. hie reeponeee to touch end pin prick
between

irritebility

end

nild degree or “mixed
epheeie" was present. This epeeoh difficulty we: evident only
epeoiel testing or then the petient wee retigued by prolonged
eti-uletion will

exeeinetion.

be deeoribed

leter.

A

by

there one e fluctuating dyeprexie of noderete eeverity.

�3.

Occuionally n. ma difficulty in drawing, being unable to handle
button: and alaavca. however, he could partonn Inch tunaticna aa
reading hinaalr, ccwbing hia hair and cthar routine daily taaka.
Ha waa naually unabla to wiwic tha aura ccwplicatad pattarna of the
hand~praxia tanta.

licetrcancaphalcgrwa ahcwad_bilatcral dittuao abncmnality.
with dacraaaa in awplituda and interwittant auppraaaion or activity
ova: tha pariatal regiona. Pnauacancaphalcgranldiaclcaod bilaterally
dilated vanericlna and wodarato “cortical atrophy". particularly in
an ion moral lobe.
szphiatric Statua; Although tha patiant waa ariantcd for
place and situation, he wada crrora an to data and than or day.
Thar. war. datacta in vacant unwary, concentration, calculation and
ability to aaauln the abatract attituda. no uwually aat placidly
ataring intc apaca or wandered aialaaaly about tha ward. Ia did hat
win with cthar pationta. whcn approachad by tag atarf he waa
friendly and paaaivoly cccparativa.' Tasting proceduraa ware
approachad with a chaarful indittcranca. Hhan, hcwavcr, ha was
panhad into Boat aituaticna :raatar than hia capacity, ha reactad

with incrwaainx itvitability and tanaicn, avantually calainating in
a “cataatrcphic reaction.” it such tiwna ha would baccwa rod in
tho taco, about that ha know tha ahawara but didn't want to continua
and mcccniy basin to map.
a. waa can. to distinguish tho right aid. or
his: body tro- the 1321:; but waa unable to wake can distinction on
tha miner's body. 11. had no difficulty either in locating nidlinc
atruccuraa or hia body, auch aa tha uoaa, heath, chin. nabilicua and
pania, or in pointing to hia cyan. With oyoa cpan ha readily fauna

W

'

�e.
hath eere, but when hie eyee were cloned he seeped ebeut hie teee
for eeverel eeeende betere leeetlns then. he eeuld'belne to hie
thighs, kneee, ankles end tees but could not point to any epeclrlo
toe ether thin the his teen.

frequently had Alrtlculty 1n locetlns port1ene or hie
upper extrenltlee. It eeked to point to hle ehouldere. be
correctly located one ehoulder, but then grayed behind his neck
locking for the other. This defect was even more noticeable in
trying tn find the ”other" elbow and wriet, and creeteet in trying
to find the "other" hind. ﬁle eeereh for the ”other" hand or wrist
Be

bizarre.

He would

parts of hie

body, the

look under the pillow, or rummage under
the nettreee becnnlng tenee and ineietius it we. lost. It should
be eupheeieed that despite the great difficulty in lecetlns
was

petlent was able to name the body parts.
except the tinseve end toee. This was true whether the pert
pointed to nee on the petient'e or on the examiner'e body.
33939;; Stetueg

(e) ééﬁﬁl? Btlnhletlon: He had difficulty in differentleeins
between the sheep end dull end of e pin. This defeat wee preach:
throughout the body, elthoush he made eignitieently fewer erreee 1n
the reee end hende. Touch atlauletian was poorly perceived. Heuelly
he coulé not state whether or not he had been tauched. Again, there

�5.

«m to be relatively better preoorvotion or this modality in
'

the hand: and face.

Except under opooiol oonditiono or examinotion of tho hands,
to he described liter, the patient who ohle to locate the eite of

it the pin on. repetitively and
or it the priok woo steadily maintained

a pin prick by pointing. however,

rapidly applied to one rosion,
at that one place, he could not looeto the point of otinmlotion.

tendon scorching lav-neat: over hio body and
not infrequently around the bed olotheo. srinaoing on thouah in
pain and exoloinins that he one trying to renove the pin. If ookod

He

would make

frantic,

where he one being priokod, ho diorozorded the question and con»

mm

on
tinued to try to move the stimulus. "m. phmmnon
stimulation or any portion or the body, but who most apparent when
the hand no tested.
(h) Double SiuultOneouo ethnolotigg; Tho phone-en: or
oxtinotion end dioplooo-ont were frequently ohoerved in tests or
different body area- by oilultoneouo tactile otiuuli. 0n etinnletins tho race and hand. otinuli to the hand we». not perceived,
or nioloooliaod to the cheek. In touting honolosoue bod: stone
(on hondvhond) extinction of one poroept III col-on. The side on
which the stimulus III not pcrooivod fluctuated, no that at one
uooont only a right-sided stimulus one perceived and o for momentleter, only a lott~oided etinnloo not perceived.
Exooonootheoio; Whenever his pal: who in oontoot with a
portion or his body or any other ohJeot, and the dorouh of that hand
In: prioked with o pin, the patient oonoiotently nioloohliaod the

�6.

ottuulun. this nialooaiisation who to whatever object the phi-tr
tartan! of the hand was touching. For txlhplc, 1f the pntioht'l
hand was routing on his thigh and the doroun of tho hand VII
priokod, he insisted that tho thigh had boon touched, and not the
hand. Th1: ninlootlisntion ~ oxooonoothooio - occurrod to the
thigh, obdonnn, 105 or (too, had who present with stimuli to oithor
hind. It Ill observed even when the patient who urged to look 1t tho
hlhdt durtng the application or the pin. nah-anesthesia could not be
elicited, however, by otinulhtion of tho pnln or polmar curtuoes of
tho ringer! uhnn the aorta: of tho hhné ill rooting on a portion or
the My, runner-more. ionization or dorul hand amnion um
correct 1! the hind III hold in space.
Iloloooltsntion also ooourrod to abduct: external to hit
body. It h1o pal: ill rooting on I tabla or on his bad. and the
doroun of tho hand It; prioknd with I pin, ho would point to those
ohjooto and 091th thlt tho pin had been $991106 "thmru." Whoa
quantionod. ho hinted thlt tho hand had huen touched, but continued
to point to tho bid or table. Proquontly. however. ho'inntotod thht
it on. tho bod or tohlo that hon boon touohnd thdhnntphhohhnnd. Ir
alkod how he could too;_tho bod being priokod with a pin he would
booonn ton... avoid the queut1on and inliot ”you touohod the bed,
not In".

III

not ell-inatod
by Itlhltanooun stimulution, oven whnn extinction of one of tho
parocpto occurred. for 03:391., 1! pins hero oinulthnoouoly applied
to the aorta of both hands Ihllo tho pal-n wore resting on o table,
he would report fetish; only on. p1n prick, that on tho loft (or
right, a: dominance fluctuhtod) and point to thn plloo whore the
loft hind huh boon rooting. saying ”you touohod the bed thoro.”
Displheonont into outrouporoonnl than.

�this

phone-enon or

dilplucancnt into cxtra~peroonal tpnoe

occurrcd daily during e period or over two nonthn.
Commont: In this paticnt a rccuicitc to dimplecenmnt into
space was that the pmlm or the hand be in contact with an external

object. In other words. then. were two cutaneooo stimuli
limnltcnecully in operation, nemoly the pin prick on the doreun or
the hand and tho pro-lure or the object in contact with the palm or
ringcro. A single nti-nluc. eooh II pricking the dornun or e hand
held in upeoe. did not elicit the dicplnccmnnt.
luoeomeutholih III elicited only on otimullting the hands.
mu oocumd am though Ilmle pin print as: perceived me cum:
in the hand: than in any other areo. excepting the thee.
Although thin potient showed In lnability to oorroctly
locate phrte or his own and tho esnminor's body, it doc: not
necoecnrily amen that exolcnelthscic in dutenmined by thie particular
type of disorder in body ache-n. the following case illustrate. the
phenomenon or exoocmeetheaiu in the preeonce or to. patient'n
some: to locate body pam.
can. 23 l.l., a 52 your old woman, III edmitted to the.
Neurolosio Service of the ﬂaunt Sinai hoeoitdl in August 1950 with
I history of grand hnl eelxuroo. She had been in good honlth until
1937 uhcn there appeared sporadio, noncntnry ecnuutione of "blacking
out." About two year: before hdniehion she began to suffer Ionthly
'

Ill

leisurel.

There was no euro.
Routino exeminntion on admiulion III within normal limits,
oxoept for dnolmia in tho right nontril. there one no organio honthl
cyndromo. apocinl x~rcy studiel reveoled evidonoo or a oohfronthl

grand

necplcen. an August 19th a oreniotoly mm: done and following
amputation of e portion or the right frontal lobe, a large bilateral

�8.

‘tub-troattl

III

umniaginnn was

axcitcd.

nor pout~opcrutive courts an; stormy. For tut lacks an.
saui~stup¢rann.r 3h. raupondod anly ta lassive, painful stimu—

than: renpanuaa ﬂirt limited to vague ineffective nttenpta
ta.punh Quay tat stimulun. In this pcriod the lnpuod uovcral tin»:

latian,
irate

and

om

um:

"sputum
um chem-Magma
did not
Bar

rttpannoa rare pruatnt.

pupil:

mutem ublmkl

retot to light.

tn. pltiint

inproved slowly and
steadily. an. hogan to rtlpond vcrbtlly and contact could be maintained
far short poriodn. Vinita, union and apparently been absent, begin
Frau about Augunt 23, 1950

to rcturn, tlthough a right unnonyloul halinntpuia tiltinoﬁ for Dunn
tino. A Iarkod orgtnic nanttl syndrtlo characterised by confusion.
disorientation and nuouognusin was prcnant.
Routine laurolggic xxnlinntion: laurtlosit exnuination in
aoptonbor 1950 diteltuoa a right honcnynnun honiunopnil, asthma
impairment of vilual Inuit: with bilatorul nocondnry Optic atraphy,
urttaslnl in all directions or ante, bilaterally patitiv. nabintki

night. and a nild dogree or uphatin. Position nan... vibration and
tonporntur. porcuptian wire unimpairtd. Thor. were difficulties in
perceptien or touch Ind pin prick stimuli at anacribod belwu.
Puzehiutric Status: The patient was usually friendly and
cooperative. Bouvver, the III frequtntly irritable 1nd unuld not
pomnit culmination. an: an. dilaritnt-d II to tins and notational:
to situation, but not to placa. Thar: var. defeat: in retention Ind
maul covered by contabulatian. am am euphoric and 41:91:,“
littlc self restraint er aoneern in social oituatiana. Usatlly uh:
would lie with her body fully oxpoaod. not intrtqunntly she toiled

�bereelt or wet the bed. Anaeognoein In: prominent.
Bod: Scheme: 0n contend the

petient

we: able

to identity

lbette correctly parts of her can and the examiner's body, such
In ears, eyee, feet and parts of the upper extremities. She
exhibited name oenfueion about the right and left eidee a! the bady.
end

Season; statues]
(a) siggie atiuulntian: The patient perceived single pin
prick cumin mi, eitheugh m undo 0003:1011“ nompntterned em»
in localisation. Theta errors were more frequent on the left side.
(b) Double ginniteheaue stimuletion: 0n sinulteneouu epplicetion of pin prick: ta both tides or the body (excluding the hands)
extinction on the left, or dieplaceaent on the left toward the level
at the right-aided stimulus were the usual reepaneee. amneleterll
linulteneaus etimuletion on the right side or the body shaved no
extinction, but ntinuiatian on the left side elicited frequent
extinetian and displacement.
Runneleetheeieg Dieplaeenent lute extra—portend! space
either
occur-m than the lettihahdawn pridked at the me time
the right hand or right cheek were stimulated. The phenamenon could

u

'

ulna be elieited then the left hand and day other are: or the left
side or the body were simultAneeualy etimnleted.
Under theee conditions the patient nislocelixed the stimulus
to the left bend.inte evade near that hand, or to the object on whieh
the mind was lying. For example. it pin pricku were e’imltehemu
applied to m right cheek and the 1m; tune, the patient indicated
she had been pricked on the right cheek and the are or the chair on
Ihich her left bend had been renting; As 1 rule ehe answered by
pointing. I: neked to verbelise the ebuld any, “the right cheek end
about here,“ (painting to the their emu er into space near be: lett

�10.

hand).

1! ssksd dirsotiy, “was year hsnd touched,” sh. sauld avoid

the gunmen mymzug can; "use," pointing st m um em to
tbs 10ft oasis sun at ta spans. It is to be netsd that oxespt undsr
the spssisl condition at sinultsnsaus stimulation tbs patient was
always sbls to point tu as to ash. hsr‘istt hand on dsssnd.
1r prieksd silnltsnsuusiy an tho dorss or was isrt sud
right hands. shs carrots}: localissd only tbs stimulus an tbs right,
been by painting sad ststins. “I: right hand.” 2h! stilnlus an the
new-y». m 190311104me by painting to m chair s:- and
saying, “asrs.* 'It ssksd lasthsr the «hair sun. sud not but 10!:
hand use issn toushsd, shs snsssrsd. ”as. hs:s’ pointing to tbs chair

an,

sun.
Inna pin prints ssrs spplisd to tho lsrt hand. sad It the suns
«ins, to snethsr sass on the 1st: sids or any baay,s 51-11.:
dispisosssus into spsos III status. Ususlly tbs stisulus to tbs
lift hand was sislosslissd onto Instsvsr structurs the hsnd sss
rusting at else t9 contiguous spsos. tbs uthsr‘stﬂsuius an tbs 10ft
sids was ususiiy oarssotly locslissd, though this stimulus too It:
onessionsiiy displaced into spans. when this doubis displsosssnt
oocurrsd, tho psiisnt.soula stats sh. rsit eve stimuli and staid paint
inte space to tbs lots sf tbs ans. stating "bars and have”.
!hsss saslosslisstiens ssrs rspsstsdiy ohssrvsa during s period
or s.smnth, sad wars not sissys limited to tbs 1st: lids. tbs: ssrs
ecossionslly obssrssd to scan: on sh. right sins. At an... c1...
localisation on tho lots its slings aorrsot ss indiestsd by pointing
and

vsrbslisstion.

.

siioitsd in this pstisnu only
the oenditian or Imitiplo smsuitsnsaus sci-ulstian. It scald
can-snsz Ixososssthssis was

'

under

not be

sliaitsd by .1331. summon isthmus. mo signifiosnt :-

�11.

that oxooonoothooid Ill appoxont ovoa though thoro In. no gross
diuordor in body ooh... on routine touting. rurthonuoro, it is
evident that bar errors in localisation not» not oi-ply on inabiiiiy
to point to or identity park: or her body by nine. ll ordinarily the

exporidaood no difficulty in doing this on oonldad.
In hoth onto. paranoia word nioiooolinod to part. or the body,
to abstain. or into npnoe contiguous with tho tron stinulotod.
ooouoiondliy. we have nine observed dilpldodnant or a stimulus to

the pardon or the can-inor; Usually ouch percent: art nioloodlilcd
to o homologous portion of tho cal-inor'o body, 0.3., a otilniud
appliod to tho potiont'u hand in reportod by hin.oo if it had been
oppiiod to tho tau-inor'o hand. 'narolr, tho nioioodlizntion ll to
any part? of the oxaniner'o body.‘ this §ypo or dioplaoonont is
illuotmttod in the following on...
also 3; 1.1., o 52 your old male, to: aduittod to Boliovuo
Payohiltrio Hoopitll with the oonplnint that ha pad hood-o oontuoed
and doprooood. for about a yetr ho had boon disoriented, oootnsod on
to date dud rolutionohipo of pooyIi, and had uialdred ubout the 01¢:
dill-nix. a. and been
to um um colony about a mu
“ you: beforo, and had uorkod no d harbor until tho rook before his
mum“ to the hupiui.

mum

'

Slowing
shouod non-o1
tomnod.

lm;gio ﬁxation! leurologiool examination

gait

and

Itation. coordination Scots our. '01: per-

lagrrotioxoo wore doiive bilaterally with normal plantar

and undo-inol.rolponnoo. Cranial norvo runoiiono ward now-n1.

otltuo thouud Ohtnxil, but only by opooidi nothodo or testing.
A pnou-oonoophalogrnu dononotrutod nodordtoly dilated ventrioloo
"ith°“t '31" 0’ def°flitia Ind ton. dilated cerebral ouloi.
098.1110 mu} Indra.
Status I
donoory

Militia

3

m

“.

�12.

evident.

0n

the

word he

eet quietly for boure

by hie bedside

taking little interest in hie surroundinge. 'Ihen opproeched by
the eterr he eppeered perplexed but one erreble. During the teeting
procedures be one cooperative unleee confronted by e teet eitoetion
in which the emeniner demanded teeke beyond hie ebility. At theee
ti-ee he showed e ”ceteetrophic' reeotion, bece-e excited end
diecontinued the exeeinetion.
Re wee dieoriented for time. place, end eituetion. However,
he nee eble to find hie Hey about the nerd, looeting hie bed, the
nnreee deek, the dootore office end the lavatory. severe ditticultiee
in intellectual function were obeerved. He nee oneble to give en
edeqnete bietcry. ﬁe could not recell the examiner's none nor the
evente or several houre before, but did not contehulete. Celculetion
end eyebol identification teete were poorly performed.
severe epheeic difficultiee were evident. Re nee uneble to
none cannon objecte, clothing or moat body perte. He could not
colorehend written collende nor could he write, but he wee able to
einple verbal cannon.
lilo dreorexie nee demonstreted in hie ettenpte to imitate
ringer end mouth novenente. nouever, he lee able to drone, feed, end
otherwise cere for hinoelt.
Bod: gaggeg He bed difficulty both in neling body perte, end
in locating the: by pointing. the defect: were Imet eevere in the
fingers, wriete end elbows, and ooceeionlly feet. There nee difficulty

mm

‘

'

in right-10ft orientetlan.
age-or: Statue;
(e) giggle Stinuletionx Routine eon-cry etudiee or touch,
pin prick and vibration eboeed no ooneietent inpeinlent. Theee

�13.

correctly looalieed and deaoribed. Oooaaiohally
a eihgle stimulue to the hand or toreahn wee dieplaoed to a contiguous
object, or to apaee about the upper extremity.
(h) Double Simultaneoae stimulation: 0n double aiaultaneoua
touch atinolation the patient dieplayed extinction and dieplaoaleht

atianli

or

were ueually

tactile etinali. lhie

he would

trials

or the teoemhand

teete or other body parte as well. to:
on ai-nltaneouely etindlating the cheek end the oppoeite hand
either report only the etioulue to the cheek (extinction of

text (6), hot
example,

nae moat evident on

nae eeen in

the hand etianlua) or would report e etmlulue to eeoh oheek (displacement or the hand stimulus). The pattern or seneory doainanoe wee that
oeoally eeen in ditruae cerebral dieeaee, the race being aoet dominant.
the hand leaet (5). There nae no lateral doaihanoe.
Rho-oaeetheeia; Dieplaoeeent into extra-pereonal apece eaa
oceaaionelly ohaerved on single etiaulation. This displaoeaent vae
fro- the hand, forearm. or the elbow to apaoe oontiguoue to the part
touched. lxoaoaeetheeia was however aarkedly exaggerated when double
einultaneoua atuuuuon was employed. Again the am. from which
the phenomenon was noet frequently dheerved were the hands. toreeraa
and elbovl. tor ext-pie, when etieuli were applied to the dorae or
both hande ae they were lying on the patieht'e lap he pointed to epeoe
in front of his kneea. It aaked to etate where he had been touched
he uould say. "the hande" but would continue to point to the epaoe
in front or hie knees. laoeo-eetheeie nae rarely noted when other
body parta. euoh ae oheeke or ehouldere were simultaneoualy stimulated.
Occasionally it one found that on teete with double allula
taneoue atinulation the patient nielooeliued a etihnlue tron hie body
to the hoaologoue region or the exeeiner'e body. For inetanoe, when
both hand: were oinultaheoualy touched he would grasp the exauiner'e

�1%.

binds and

strin-

ho had boon touched

“there.”

Dsopito tho
sxosinor's insiotsnoo thst tho stinnlu: hsd boon to tho outiont'o
hoods, tho pstiont would persist in pointing to tho oxouinsr's hands.
When asked to noon the ports touched, he would on: 'thsro. thorc."

The

ﬁll.

phonononon

Isl occasionally

observed on liltltsnoons

sti-nlotions or both elbows or ohooko. It was signirioont that this
nislooslisotion to tho oxosinor's body occurred oven thou tho potiont
urgod to look ot tho otinnlotiono.
It III observed that onotionsl tension, inoresoing tho rot.
or touting or unduly prolonging the oxasinotion, inorossod tho
inoidonoo of oxosolosthosis. ror ext-910, to initisl sppliostion

was

of pin priok to the right hand and loft chock, tho pstiont reportsd
only tho the. psrospt, quitting tho hsnd stimulus. Lstor, ho
localised the two othnulino tho ohooks. As tho sxoninotion pro«
groslod sad the phyoioion opsodod up the testing. tho patient boot-o

sore tohss. no thin looslisod tho toos pore-pt correctly, but
innistsd thst the hand otimlntion as into upon. in front at the hand.
tinslly both stimuli our. displaced into spooo or to tho oxaninor's
body.

those phononons wort obsorvod dsily over s period of two and
a half unhthl.
Coulent: Hhilo single stimulation occasionally produced

oxooolnlthosio in this individual, tho phenomenon Ill note pronounced
under conditions of double oi-ultonoouo Iti-nlstion. this ntiont
sloo lioloooliood stilnli to tho oxsninor's body. lhotionol tonoion,
prolonged canninstion, or inorossing tho onto or touting exaggerated
the phone-anon or ozosonosthosin.
Bisousoion; In oonoidoring thou. ossoo it is illodistoly
opporont thst oxooolosthosis is osoooiotod with o savor. orgsnio

�sentsl syhdrose. therefore, it night he ersued thst exoscseethesis
‘is sorely e ssniteststiou of the petient's sentsl contusion; thst

15.

the petient sisply points into spsce becsuse he is confused. However,
we hsve eyesined sssy severely confused pstieuts end found exososesthesis only rarely. moreover, exososestheeie is e petterned
phenomenon. desonetrstle in eschvpstieat under defined conditions,
predicteble ss to the eree tron which it will occur end the extra»

personel spetisl region to which the sensation will be projected.
For exemple, in Case I, exoscsssthesie could be elicited only from
the head end only when the dorsus use etisuleted st the sese tine es
the psls or fingers were in contsct with smother object.
Displscesent under these circusstsuoes use ususlly not hephsssrd.
sis s rule it occurred to the object touchins.the palm or fingers. In
exososesthesis could be elicited only by double silulteneous
stteulstion. It see seen most clearly in the head end could be
elicited only unileterslly st say one exesinetion. Again the

Case 2,

displace-eat use not hspheesrd; the stimulus es s rule use locslised
to extre-pereonsl speoe contiguous to the eree sctuelly stilulsted.

In Cece 3 the phenosenon use observed sgsin under conditions or double
sinnltsneous stimulation. end the displsceseuts were either to spece
contiguous to the stisnlsted eree, or to honologous srees of the
exsliner'e body. It is signifiosnt thst these displscesente could be

elicited

even when the

or the stimuli.

pstients

to look st the epplicstion
the ensuiner pointed out the error

were urged

noreover, even when
in looelisstion end esphssised the i-plsusebility or their response.
the pstiente chsrecteristioelly insisted on the correctness of the

nislooslistion.
rectors Influencing lxososesthesisa

There ere esny rectors which influence the sppesrsnce of
exoeosesthesis. Except under specisl conditions in children, it

�16.

has been obeerved exclueively in patiente uith severe mental
chensee reeulting true dieeeee or the brein. It ie influenaed by
the type of etianlue need. the rate or etiluletion. ee veil an by the
elelent of einnlteneity or eti-mli. loreover, the e-otianel etete

at the petient nee e eignificent effect

the phenuuenon ee doee
the pert or the body etinnleted. In ease oeeee exoeaneetheeie
nee been nude epperent by edeinietretion at eeell doeee or enoberbitei
eodiun. :heee feature will be diecueeed.
(e) Bilateral Cerebrel Dieeeee; the emlptae beekground in
every eeee or exoealnetheeie ie en arsenic uentel eyndraee eeoondery
to bilateral ceretrel dieeeee. we have not been eble to denonetrute
exeealeetheeie in en adult unleee there «ere eevere neutel thengee.
But,ee previouely noted,it ie e rare phenonenou end only few or the
individuele vith eevere arseniereentel eyndruee show it. In boo
patiente with arsenic brain dieeeee at verging eeverity, exoeaneetheeie
ee- obeerved in ephroxintely as or the one: (5 ). Even in then
patiente, it wee not leniteet in every exeeinetion. end it: frequency
vee reedily eltered by «bungee in the oonditione of teeting. It ie
therefore evident that eevere bileterel oerebrel dieeeee, in iteelr,
ie not sufficient to produce exoeoleetheeie.
(b) Irrect or Binnlteneaue atiunli: whet einnlteneoue
eti-uletion nay elicit eeneory phenaleue not epperent on eingle
eti-nletion nee been previouely denonetreted (2). tor exllple, e
henieeneorw eyndrtne in e heeiplegia petient he: not be diecernihle
except under eonditione or double ei-nlteneuue etinuletion. Tune.
single etilnietion may be well perceived end latelieed by the
petient. but the eddition at e eecond etinulue einulteneouely applied
.1: no effect integration thet the phenomene of extination, obecuretion
end diepleaeeent become epperent.
on

�17.
‘

m

‘sullarly, “alumnus “mutton elicited “comma
1: an aunt an angle annulus umlnulon. or magnum

11: when

'oun

1

n In Manama: mun:

and 2.

man. stimulation. In
ulmltmem «mung» am a menu»: “mum
on

for aligning the phonon-anon. It could not be amount-um by
tingle uttunlatlan. In am 3, ant-tumult could “nationally

onum on .112ng stimulation. but annulment “mutton
dmmtum ﬂu. inhuman run much water frequency.
b0

(a) :12! a! gtggglu! Inst lrtbotgvug or tub vurioua Uzi-”11
and in that Manama. mix as ﬁnal. when. :5.le pin prick,
ripotltlvc tauch and rlpctltlvc pin prick. it It: noted that

mutt" tmh "man mm was: «1'00th 1!: allowing cucum-

thuu. m. m «mull: two on double almlum Itimlltion.
(a) gram o: t! "time's
an»! momentum-la

anal
um amt-mud hr 31%.!!qu in th- m: “mum

which and»

mum“. not. difﬁcult. lama tbs n“ of “hunting, artho

unduly prolonging

mn~m~ml Imo.

tantalum 1mm“
Alta,

11‘

the

the

Multan-nt- to

twin" was deliberately

critical or the mtlmt'o 0mm, tho phonmmm appomd with 5mm
futon mam-d an. action“ switch at tho
Imam”.
patient, and 1t amt-d mun-r. prom.“ I "ututmphlo" mctlan.

m

man of m: It In» boon pmlmly dmtnm that
arugula» in pomcpucm my be magnum by mum-ac.
(0)

nous-mu: team an administered lutnvmmly
la 400.30! or 3 to 7 srllnl tn pltlonta Ilth altrus. ctrohwll distant.
Prior to am “nutrition. thou patent! mnltum the phone-on.
at «amulet: and dllplumt at pump” on ““1”me tutu, but
lntuloanta

not.

(5) .

alumnus“.

m1 lo under the lntlmmc or the

Whitman

�18.

three pationta ahovad oxoaoneatheaia. in addition to extinction and
displacement. In two other patienta. in whoa axoooaootheaia has
boon alioited only after a protraoted taating period. the
administration or anoharbital aodiua elicited exoaoaeatheaia at the
onset or teating and exaggerated the phone-one of extinction and
displace-ant.
Relation of lxoaoleotheaie to Extinction, Ottonretion and
Diaplaoalent: In our experience. whenever exoooaeatheaia haa been
observed.
phonon-nu of extinction, obeouration and displacement
are alao preaent. lxoaoaoathaeia, hou‘var. ia a rare phone-anon,
whereae extinction, ohaouration and diaplaoolent are eon-only
ohaerved. loreover. ahareaa extinction, otaouration end diaplaoaaont
ere treouontly aeon in coult patient: with lilo cerebral dyoronotion
(5). diapleoelent into extranperooael opeoe 1a only preaont in oaaaa
or severe aental ohangea due to diaeaae ot-the brain. It may
therefore he oonoluded that exoeolootheaia in adult: repreaenta a
aora severe type or oarebrel dratunotion than other oiaultenaoua

m

otiaulation phone-one.
nalation of Ixoaoleatheaia to gag: logger

It night

he aeid

that exoaoaaatheaia ia a pathologio extenaion or the body image.
The normal individual is continually extending the boundariea or thia
image. For example, need oitae the eta-plea of tho lolan with a
teeter in her hat who “real!" when the feather ie tonohod, and the
aurgeon who handlea hia probe as though

it were

an axtanaion or hia

tingera (1). In the normal individual, holever, theae extension.
of the body 1-130 art fluid, illediately raveruibla and clearly
recognised by the individual aa artificial. the surgeon for example,
ia able at any'nolent to redefine correctly hia body Liege. no
“known" that the prob. it not his finger. In the group or petionta

’

�19.

described above. hosover. the extension of tho body isage scans to
operate in a pathologio, rigid tons. under certain conditions
these patients lose the ability to ssintain a realistic definition

of tho

lisits

of

their

body.

The: behave as though portions or the
contiguous external world are concrsteix incorporated into tho inner

image of

their body's extent.

Although

say oonsider exosoaesthesis- a spooiaiiaed
body ilage disturbance it should ho noted that patients who do not
show

we

diftionlties in identifioation

location of body parts still
us: show aisiocaiisstion into estrsapersonsl space. Convorsely,
patients with so atolhility to identity or locate their body parts
on oosssnd. do not neoessariiy sanirest eaosoassthesis.
In similar fashion, thers is no necessary relationship between
ascsoaoothsais and position sense difficulties. A patient (Case 3)
who manifested displacessnt of sensation into
extrs~personai space,
did not asks errors in routine tests a: position sense in” tho
extresitiee. this it oonsistent sith observations previously ssdc
by Head that localiation of single stilnli is not functionally
roleted to senss of position or the extrusities (1).
non or the land: Although displsoelont into extrs~persona1
space has been elioited tron various areas or the body, it has been
observed to ooouh lost frocoentiy tron the hand. loreover. in no
ossc hoe it been elicited from another area and been absent tron
and

1

the hand.

this oredileotion tor the

hand

is consistent

with the ssnncr

in shioh other dysfunctions of the nervous system are reflected. As
a role when tho functioning of one side of tho body is impaired
through cerebral disease the pathology is soot saniast in the hand.

�20.

lhne 1n the annex heuiplegit reeultina tram e capeulur leeion the
pereeie, body image diuturhenoe end eeneory late ere use: pruexnene
1n the hind Ind (insert.
In the-e petaente end in other. eleh dzrruee cerebral
dieelee the phennlenl a: extinction. eheourltion end diepleoenent
Ire elee beet e11¢18ed when the head in teeeed. lurthenlore.
etuﬂiee at eh. order at eeneory dullnenee or verioau ereee or the
had: Genoa-trite the hand in the lowest hunk. thie in true in the
eminence order or petunia with cox-em), dieeue (5). and mm
nor-e1 eubjeete, both edulte and children (6).
stallerly, then elleetheaie 1: oheerved, 1% 1e eeen she:
olenrlr 1n khe head. Bender tad lethnneon (it) deeovihed e «nee
1n ehioh'the clinical courae III reflected in e waxing end unnans
alleetheexe. Ae than petient inpraved, the trees from ehseh the
phenunmaen oould be

elicited

amniniehed.
ale delohetreble only in the hand.

until finally alleethneie

In entotopegneeie the hands hre ante proraundly effected
thin other regiane. ringer Isnneie. paneibly the enrlieet etsn or
body image dieturbenee, 1- trequentlr eeen 1n the eheenae or other
groee dieeurbanaee or the bed: eehnne. Furthemeore, phantom 11gb,
tnoeosnoeia. cluellsxn and eyneetheeie Ire phenalnne in which the
role a: the hand 1e eepectclly praninent.
Just an en». ”811010310 puma-em
uniteet in tests or
other body parte. but 3:. that aleerly delonetrehle 1n the hand. so
the. exoealeetheete, though nonunionnlly delanetrnhle eleevhere,
layman: apparent in exnlihntion of the function! at an. hand.
14: It hne been observed that
luaealeytheele 1n the ham-e1
eeneory pheno-mne which aoeur 1n pettente with cerebral dylrunction

m

�.1
{{{{{

21.

h

any bu fauna in tho annual young child (6). Similarly.
have unvor fauna in adult: nxecpt than
QSOOGIOIthlltl, thick

I.

that. in lirkod cornbrnl Ginsu... nun b0 roadily obnorvod in
childrcu up to in. ago or tour. In urn-ining a 13:30 302103 of
norm. chiidm it u. now that the initial mpm or

ohildron to iambic ninnitunooal Itinuiation fruqunatly incinnnd'
axoianucthnuia. nithough tho nor. can-an rosponnos In». «xtinctian
and dispinou-ont. lionenusthonia was IIrO. havuvor. utter tho

initili til trinis.

In» truqunaa: with union uaonalusthnain.nnw he noon in
children up to tho as. or tour insanity that it an: roprouont.
in thy child, 3 ”annual" dovelopnuntai Itsse in on: ergnnisation
of perception. It: uppourunan in uduits with novor. brain €110.30
any possibly ha. I. with aunt: pathologio phauulcnu, a rungIIion
in function to a pruvioul iovvi at ntnnory integration.

aBIIiII;

lillooIIilation of tnotil. Itﬂluli into
axtrn~poruuna1 space is dcnarihad tad tar-pd alone-cathonii.
Bantu-nathnlil 1' aha-trod in pationta with saver. organic
unntal lynarunon. It in apnaront only very rural: on tingle
tactilu Itilnintion and in not. readily elicitdd by tho t'ahnituo
of Gambia lilnltnnsoul atiunlntian. It is exaggcrntod by fatigue,
rigid touting ﬁnd incrOIlld unotional tonlian. lurhitnrttc
intaxiention also may elicit or uxnggorlto the phauuncnon.
Eh. pattoraod

linsannathnuin in swat apparnnt in Itinniutian of the hand,
but his bOCn obsorVCd in tiatl of othnr body part0. ﬂail. it
an: be canaidorod t pathologio axttntian of an. bad: image, it is
act dopondcnt upan othcr ¢on¢anitunt body inns. disturbanotl.

�nelmthOllt Mu bola observed chltfly 1n
gamma nth nun natal chanson, u 1: not a manna»
or contusion, but a patterned pnucun- phonmnm. It may be
a "mum,“ patient: win: Mum}, animation. to I 93110th
“new” was. in smear «alumna, u mated by the rut
Although

that 1t 1.

«mum.

"Ian: abut-"d

in cinnamon-

men. tut:

91‘

mg

�1.
2.

1mm, 3.: Studies
London, 1920.

(a)

£3.

&amp;1mm

in lourolcgy, Vol. II, Oxford Univ. Prom,

ammo, Id. lad wanna, Mm: Extinction
mu, inILL,
humans“. mu.xm1.unzuhut.,
g2; 717-725

phenomenon

member, 19%.

m, m. as:
Itnuutien
(b)

r

advantage. or the method at unannounthe neurological omimtion. monument:
Anal-1c...

11.3.:

12.; 755-458.

1n

V

was.

mm: he pheamnm or union unplacuo‘nt.
mm,
Awhmmelwr .. u. 9 607-621,
lay, 1951.
(I)

MIR,

LB... SWIM), IJ‘. lad
gutuiugggo: the body team.

W

Arcth

m ﬂ.gm1.uq¢nug.,
a

1

m

3.1“:

-

ind
anaemia
§£L tea-am.

Jeannine”

‘

(b)
LB. and “We! 11.: Pattern: in alumni:
their unﬁt»: to disorder
of ﬁnd: when and other unto”

phone-m.
5. vm, I... ﬁlm, I. Ind

g5; 501615, October,

m

and

1950.

tun-mm tut
mm,
Maximum sign or untrue
heatnmiymejnmlm, 3!. £6.58, 1952.
6. (I)
and mm, In Datum 1n perception
I... rm,atII.no.
on IMltlmm 0!
Ind land.
I I
250-»252, June, 1950. aura“)
LBJ

m,

(2:)
an

,

809mb“,

1951.

0.

.

.

111.8. mm, I. and
11.:
mm,
mm,
{out
or
and
hand.
“autumn
no.

§§: 355-362.

£8

Patterns

11:

.

”nation

mammobgguglg8%..

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2304">
                <text>Exosomesthesia; the displacement of cutaneous sensation into extra-personal space. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1952; 56 (77th Meeting): 260-2. (abstract).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2305">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2306">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-6a-008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2307">
                <text>1952</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2308">
                <text>Shapiro, Mortimer F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Bender, Morris B</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2309">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2310">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2311">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from the A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, October 1952, Vol. 68, pp. 481-490</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2312">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2313">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74433">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80994">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87555">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94116">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="237" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="28">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/7defb938ce2262c49752d69a21de6f6d.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5a753824ca2576c05cbbf0c478051e0c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100654">
                    <text>Spinal Fluid Findings
Following Cerebral Angiography
Joseph, M. Stein, M.D. and Max Fink, M.D.

WITH increasing use of cerebral angiography, the problem arose as to Whether

the procedure, of itself, produced changes in the cerebrospinal ﬂuid. Forty—
eight hours after angiography a spinal ﬂuid examination in a patient suspected
of a brain tumor revealed a cloudy ﬂuid with 3,000 white blood cells per
cu. mm. Prior to angiography the ﬂuid had been clear, colorless and without
any cells. As, no information concerning the relationship of pleocytosis to
angiography was available, it was decided to study the changes in the spinal
ﬂuid by the usual clinical methods.
Spinal ﬂuids from 21 patients were examined prior to and following angiography. Lumbar punctures prior to angiography were done at various intervals, but all punctures following angiography were performed between 12
and 24 hours after the procedure. In each instance the spinal ﬂuid was exam—
ined for color, cell count and total protein content.
All angiograms were percutaneous, using 35 per cent Diodrast as the contrast medium. Maximal Diodrast volume was 70 ml. at one procedure. While
the majority of patients were subjected to unilateral carotid punctures, bi—
lateral punctures were done in four, and combined bilateral carotid and ver—
tebral punctures in one patient. Either intravenous Pentothal (14 cases) or
local procaine (seven cases) anesthesia was used.
RESULTS

Of the 21 subjects, significant changes in the spinal ﬂuid following angiography were seen in only two cases. In one, a patient with a cerebral an—
giomatous malformation and multiple aneurysms, 5,000 red blood cells per
cu. mm. were seen in a pink spinal ﬂuid. In the second, a patient with a
chromophobe adenoma of the pituitary gland, the protein content of the spinal
ﬂuid changed from 89 to 151 mg. per cent; also, seven lymphocytes per cu. mm.
were recorded when previously there had been none.
In all other subjects, changes in color, protein content and cell count were
not signiﬁcant. Three subjects showed transient hemiparesis following an—
From the department of neurology and psychiatry, New York University College of Medicine and the neurologic service (third division) and psychiatric division, Bellevue Hospital, New York City.
Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol. 3, No. 2

137

�NE UROLOGY

138

giography, and in none of these were there signiﬁcant changes in the spinal
ﬂuid. Since Diodrast can cause changes in membrane permeability,1 and the
spinal ﬂuid reﬂects such changes, it could be postulated that a relationship
between complications following angiography and changes in the spinal ﬂuid
might exist. Such changes were not demonstrated in the present cases. F urther investigations with more exacting techniques for protein determination
and protein differentiation are indicated.
CONCLUﬁONS

Neither a marked pleocytosis nor a marked increase in protein content of
the spinal ﬂuid are usual concomitants of Diodrast angiography. It may be
concluded that when such spinal ﬂuid changes are found they are unrelated
to the procedure.
REFERENCE
1. OLSSON,

0.: Cerebral angiography: Toler-

ance for contrast media of diodrast type,

J. Neurol., Neurosurg.,
1949.

6c

Psych, 12:312,

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2364">
                <text>Spinal fluid findings following cerebral angiography. Neurology. 1953 Feb; 3(2): 137-8.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2365">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2366">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-10-014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2367">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2368">
                <text>Stein, Joseph M.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2369">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2370">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2371">
                <text>Reprinted from NEUROLOGY, Minneapolis, February, 1953, Vol.3, No.2</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2372">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2373">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74439">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81000">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87561">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94122">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="238" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="29">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/7e92065b94f7b6d5425d61aa477e6ec4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e45a9c50dfd09b37a641b179b46ee31a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100655">
                    <text>ABSENCE OF A PARENT AS A
SPECIFIC FACTOR DETERMINING
CHOICE OF NEUROSIS

Preliminary Study
SIDNEY TARACHOW,

MD.1 and MAXIMILIAN FINK, MD.2
New York, N. 'Y.

Psychoanalytic experience has made important contributions to
the problem of the differential etiology of various neuroses, psychoses, and character disturbances. This has been accomplished
chieﬂy by the identiﬁcation of the decisive areas of conﬂict in the
patient. Among the factors involved are the nature of the instincts
in the conﬂict, the time of the decisive conﬂict, the intensity of the
frustrations or traumata, the availability of substitute gratiﬁcations, and the characteristics of the historical situation (Fenichel,
1).

It

is difﬁcult to evaluate the speciﬁcity of any one of these

factors in the choice of a particular neurosis. Recent investigations
tend to show that while a particular neurosis may apparently be
an expression of conﬂict at a certain level of development, nevertheless experiences at some earlier or previous level may produce
tendencies which provoke, potentiate or distort conﬂicts of a subsequent period of development.
With increasing psychoanalytic knowledge, the task of isolating
concrete factors inﬂuencing speciﬁc choice of neurosis becomes
ever more difﬁcult. It becomes even more difﬁcult if one attempts
to assess the intangible factor of ego strength of an individual in
his struggle to control and express his various instincts or his
attempts to fashion defenses or character traits. Nevertheless, it
1Attending Psychiatrist, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N.
2 Fellow in Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
67

Y.

�68

TARACHOW—FINK

should be possible to ﬁnd a way of approaching mental operations
in a systematic way which would lead in the direction of solving
the problem of speciﬁcity of choice of neurosis.
In seeking a systematic way to solve this problem, it occurred
to us that perhaps certain elements in the external historical
situation might lend themselves more easily to the preliminary
steps of such a search. If a certain external historical situation were
isolated and studied, perhaps it could be correlated with certain
invariable psychic consequences. Freud (2) made such an observation when he noted that men who have weak or absent fathers
tend to develop homosexual trends.
The external historical factor we selected was the presence or
absence of both parents during the important developmental years
of the child. We decided to investigate the relation of this external
factor to the success or failure of the resolution of ambivalent
feelings, the ability to fuse the instincts of love and hate. For reasons to be noted we selected hysteria and obsessive-compulsive
neurosis as the clinical expressions of the success or failure of the
fusion.
We then set up the following hypothetical basis for this study
and made a tentative prediction of the data to be discovered. A
child brought up by both parents will solve the problem of resolu—
tion of ambivalent feelings more satisfactorily than a child who
has lost one parent for any signiﬁcant period of time. A child
facing only one parent does not have both his love and his hatred
equally and freely available to be directed to the parent. If he
loves the single parent the hate will tend to be repressed, and vice
versa. A child with both parents, on the other hand, has two
objects against whom both sides of the ambivalence can be directed in turn. He can hate one and love the other, or the opposite.
Two objects give the child much more liberty than one. This
freedom would not hinder resolution of ambivalence, but rather
facilitate it. He would have all his feelings relatively more available to him in comparison to the child with one parent. When the
time arrives for the necessary fusion of feelings for more mature
relationships the child who had had both parents is in a better
position. Both sides of the ambivalence having been available, the
fusion is more complete and normal. The other child, having
relatively only one side of the ambivalence available, never succeeds

�CHOICE OF NEUROSIS

69

in fusing his ambivalent feelings and remains with a burden of
one-sidedly more repressed and defused instinctual feeling.
According to our hypothesis the child who had two parents and
had succeeded in fusing his feelings would tend to develop hysteria, if he developed a neurosis. The other child would tend to
develop obsessive compulsive neurosis. This follows from the
familiar psychoanalytic formulations of defused ambivalence in
the compulsive neurosis and the fused genital level of feeling in
hysteria. This hypothesis was tested by consulting the case material from Hillside Hospital. We searched for clearly deﬁned
cases of each category and studied the incidence of absence, death
or loss of one parent for any reason whatever. Only clear-cut cases
were used. All mixed and intermediate syndromes were eliminated,
as were phobias and anxiety states.
Sixty-one records have so far been found suitable: of these,
twenty-seven were patients with conversion hysteria and thirty-four
with compulsive-obsessive neurosis. Separation from a
parent was deﬁned as the absence of a parent for periods exceeding one
year
before the child’s ﬁfteenth year of age. Note was made of the time
of the separation, the reason, the duration, and the
age of onset
of the neurotic symptoms.
Of the twenty-seven patients with conversion hysteria, three
(11%) were subjected to periods of separation. In each the separation
occurred between the ages of ﬁve and nine; in two by death and
in one by emigration. In the latter the period of separation was
of six years’ duration.
Of the thirty-four patients with obsessive-compulsive neurosis,
ﬁfteen (44%) suffered extended periods of separation. Nine occurred
between the ages of ﬁve and nine, four before the age of ﬁve, and
one each at thirteen and ﬁfteen. Separation was caused by death in
nine subjects, hospitalization in three, and emigration in three. In the
latter the separation lasted from one to three years, during the
child’s age of three to seven years. In four subjects there were
double separations. In one subject there was hospitalization of a
parent for a year, return home as an invalid for two years and
then death. In three other subjects there was death of one
parent
and illness of the other at another time in the child’s life. In all
instances the parental loss occurred before the clinical onset of
neurotic symptoms.

�70

TARACHOW—FINK

These data point in the same direction as the hypothesis suggested, namely, that loss of a parent tends to increase the difﬁculties
of solving the problem of ambivalence.3 So many other factors
enter into the situation that we would limit ourselves to the conclusion that these ﬁndings warrant further study of the suggested
correlation.
Other studies of parental deprivation have taken a somewhat
different direction. Oltman et al. (5) studied the difference in rate
of parental deprivation, comparing various psychoses with neuroses. They found that the incidence of loss of a parent did not
vary in schizophrenia and manic-depressive psychosis from their
control group, while psychoneuroses were higher. Their control
group was State Hospital personnel, with 32 per cent deprivation.
Psychoses showed 34 per cent and the neurotic subjects 49 per
cent. The psychoneurotic group was not diagnostically further
differentiated. Madow and Hardy (4), in a study of clinic population in the Army, found parental deprivation by death in 36 per
cent of the neurotics. They used as a control, life insurance statistical tables which indicated an 11 to 15 per cent incidence of
parent loss before the age of sixteen. A third study (3) of a student
health clinic population in a State University indicated that 31
loss
of
neurotic
the
cent
through
subjects
reported
parent
per
death, while only 131/2 per cent of the controls (normal students)
did. None of these workers were searching for the factors we are,
and there is no breakdown into the various neurotic categories.
These observations cannot be used comparatively with our speciﬁc
point in mind. In general the data from the literature indicate
that the incidence of parent loss is greater in neurotic subjects
than in psychotic and control groups, although the various control
groups show a lack of uniformity. Our own subjects taken as
a group (this excludes many mixed neuroses, phobics and anxiety
states) show an average incidence of parent loss of 30 per cent.
The incidence in the obsessional neurotic is higher than in the
cited controls, while in hysteria it coincides with the lower percentages of the controls.
Apart from the subtleties of the psychodynamic processes which
this study overlooks there are also gross difﬁculties in evaluating
3Chi square was calculated as 6.32 which is signiﬁcant at the .01-.02 level.
The chi square was corrected for continuity by Yates’ method.

�CHOICE OF NEUROSIS

71

the statistics. First of all, the sampling is small. This will be
remedied as the study continues. No other study differentiated
among the neuroses, and diagnostic criteria probably vary from
one institution to another.
This study can be reﬁned and develoPed in a number of directions. The dynamics with reference to the separation could be
explored. The presence or absence of parental surrogates should
be looked into. Other factors of separation such as deafness or
blindness or parent’s going out to work must all be considered.
SUMMARY

A hypothesis was formulated stating that unresolved ambivalence (instinct defusion) may be related to the absence of one
parent during the critical formative years. It was tentatively predicted that obsessive-compulsive neurosis (illustrative of instinct
defusion) would therefore show a high rate of parental deprivation and that hysteria (illustrative of instinct fusion) would show
a low rate. The actual data were: thirty-four cases of obsessive-compulsive neurosis showed 44 per cent of parental loss: twenty-seven
cases of hysteria showed 11 per cent parental loss. We consider this
at least a provocative difference. Even though many intrapsychic
factors enter into the problem of unresolved ambivalence, these
data warrant further study along these and related lines.
REFERENCES

(l) Fenichel, 0.: The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. New York: W. W.
Norton 8: Co., 1945.
:2(2) Freud, S.: Three Contributions to the Theory of Sex. In The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud. New York: Modern Library, 1938.
(3) Ingham, H. V.: A Statistical Study of Family Relationships in
Psychoneurosis. Am. J. Psychiat., 106:91-98, 1949.
(4) Madow, L. and Hardy, S. E.: Incidence and Analysis of the Broken
Family
in the Background of Neurosis. Am. J. 0rthopsychiat., 17:521-528. 1947.
(5) Oltman, J. E., McGarry, J. J., and Friedman, 8.: Parental Deprivation and
the “Broken Home” in Dementia Praecox and Other Mental Disorders, Am. J. Psychiat., 1082685-694, 1952.

�Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
Volume II, Number 2

April, 1953

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2374">
                <text>A statistical study of a psychoanalytic hypothesis: absence of a parent as a specific factor determining choice of neurosis. Journal of the Hillside Hospital, 2: 67-71, 1953.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2375">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2376">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-11-015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2377">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2378">
                <text>Tarachow, Sidney; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2379">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2380">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2381">
                <text>Reprinted from JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL Volume II, Number 2 April, 1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2382">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2383">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74440">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81001">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87562">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94123">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6748" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6544">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e7dc2fcb5fc19380588fec1c1d7b8cf6.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e4bf0125cc9cc7fe7c750dbacfa00dd7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107149">
                    <text>�SOME EFFECTS OF A NEW PSYCHQTOQEN

IN BEFRESSIVE STATES

J. Mednna
Univereity of Illinoie College of
L. G. Ahood

A

and

L.

Hedioine

group of 3~R~snhetitnted piperidyl beneiletee have been

recently denonetreted to poseees peychotceieetic propertiee(l.2).
The N-nethyl-snpiperidyl beneilete, in doeegee of 5-10 mg
orally,
produced distinct auditory and visual hellucinatione in every
nor-e1 individual teeted. The hallucinations lasted for many
bears, and were accompanied by green distortion of visual perand by e confosionel etete corresponding to delirium.
ception
A nnnber of
subjects exhibited paranoid ideotion and ideee of
grandeur, while others suffered a conplete loee of contact with
the environ-eat, end frequently reacted to their hallocinetione.
When the toxic symptoee disappeared, the
experienced
ethecte
e
earked physical eeekneee for 10—24 honre, after which period they
regained their pro-experimental statue.
It see noticed, however, that some of the normal volunteer subJects developed a change in their heeic mood and drive. This
change usually appeared 24 to 48 hours after the phyeicel weakness
disappeared. The newly energies modulation of need can be characterized es slightly hypenenic end of increeeed drive. This
leet observation indicated that the drug night he naefnl in the
treatment of peychietric states in which the ontetending eyepton
ie a depressed need.
In the course of exonining the structureoaotivity relationships
of various congenere of the piperidyl beneiletee (3), it wee
found that substitution or e cyclopentyl for one of the phenyl
groups in beneilic acid considerably enhanced peychotogenie
potency end greatly prolonged the duration of action. The colu
pound, deeigneted JB-329', has the following structure:

Q
*-

{’

I

“2‘5

0

Ell/Q
- g

361

‘0

N-ethyl-B-piperidyl cyclopentylphenyl glycolate hydrochloride
This derivative also eeened to produce considerably more hyperend central etieeletion than did its beneilate congener.
ectivity
The present comnunicotion concerns the nee of J8~339 on psychi-

etric patients.

DB, one a 60-year-old eon, e
first
patient,
§5g3_ﬁgt_*:
ormer r cklayer, who had been hospitalized for the last ten
years. Exeeinetion revealed his caee to be one of eevere depres»
eion iith suicidal tendencies, ceoeed apparently by the necrotic

The

�.

7

.., .

t

V...

".7“ .........4. ,g-vvwmh . ”a...“

.

man.

w.- ...,..r.....,.......

r.” ..u._,..,,.,.—Y “any,” p,..r.._....~.w.....F—,

.»...

wwv.-.» an...“

...~.,v»,.,

.

"ﬁn y”...

wr—u-nrl’nu _,.,

V...

..W;.,..I.:.v...._.._..r*‘ 7..

reaction of his burned~out body to the insoluble probles of his
wife’s gsychotio illness. The patient eas given 12 as of 33-329,
and sit in an hour showed signs of confusion, drowsiness, ataxia,
and hypereflexia. A few hours later he began
hallucina~
having
tions, saa disoriented, extreaely restless, and beg nning to lose
contact with the environaent. Autonosic syaptoas were present
throughout, such as aydriasis, tachycardia, dryness of the south,
and muscular weakness. At the end of 24 hours, he seeaed con~_
siderahly less depressed, sailed, laughed, and was such sore
talkative, although he professed to be Just as depressed as he
was before the treat-ant. Psychological re-exaaination with the
Eduardo and Rorschach tests indicated a definite iaproveaent in
seed and general outlook, and although the depression still
existed, it seessd realistically based, and was considerably less
overehelding. The patient, hosever,.rofased to go back to his
psychotic wife, and was returned to a state hospital.
EP,
a
an
33~year-eld unaarried shite aan, coaplained
he,
0%..
o
extreee apathy, and a chronic spastic colitis.
spression,
He had quit his job over a year ago because of an increasing
depression, accompanied by feelings of inadequacy and lack of
desire to work. Psychological tests revealed his to be iasature,
with little or no effect, no signs of anxiety, and no insight
into his condition. He reacted to 10 ag of JB~329 in such the
seas manner as the previous patient, covering a tine-span of 18
hours. At the and of this period, he appeared very cheerful, and
of the depressed, haunted features of his face had disappeared.
all
He gave the iapression of a nan sell on the way to
after
recovery
a long illness. That ease day he indulged in a rather vigorous
gene of baseball, nixed, and talked freely with the other patients.
He adsitted feeling sore aggressive and exuberant, and expressed
a desire to go back to sort as soon as he was discharged. Psychological re~exaaination showed his to be sore responsive, less
inhibited, and his outlook less liaited. The patient was discharged two days after receiving the drug, and two days later
be procured a position, which he still retains after three aonths.
c
a
had
lea,
47-yearweld'aarried.aan,
a history
§%;f_§g‘_%l
0
ntera ttent depressions since 1953. He had been unable to
work during the past year because of the depression. at the ties
of his admission, he showed syaptoas of restlessness and extreae
agitation; he ens harassed by self-accusations and feelin of
guilt. Pro-therapy tests revealed an inadequate personal ty with
en extreaely passive dependence.on other people. The existent
anxiety and depressive features sore overlaid upon a longostanding
character disorder. The patient's response to 12 ng of JB~329
differed fro: the previous patients only insofar as the halluci»
natory episodes sere far aore vivid and of longer duration.
After 36 hours, the patient exhibited aarked increase in actor
activity and a draaatic iaproveaent in need. Psychological reexasination revealed that he was now able to express hopeful and
resolute attitudes toward the future, although he still had
little confidence in his ability to achieve the goals he envisioned.

�after being discharged,
which

he spontaneously erote a letter
were taken the following statements:
free
For your infor~
nation, ay progress has been good. I as working about [all tine
have gained-about ten pounds. ﬂy appetite is very good not.
as extremely grateful to you for what you have done.‘
Two weeks

...I
...I

who
a
54*yearuold
earried
sea
shite
eoaan
ap»
gagg_§g‘_3z each
older, and had been in a very severe depree~
pears very
sion for the last ten years. She had phobic paranoid reactions,
suicidal ideas, and hysterical attacks accoepenied by screening.
excessive crying, and other indications of desire {or attention.
Psychological exaninetion indicated an unsound personality strse~
tnre which scene to have been infantile even before the onset of
the present illness. The effects produced by 12 a; of JB~329 were
to those in the other patients. and lasted for 24 hours.
eiailer
The following day, she appeared more vivacious and nest of the
outward signs of her illness had disappeared. 0n the succeeding
day, she socialised for the first time with other patients, and
participated in occupational therapy activities. She seeaed‘sur~
prisingly cheerful, enjoyed her food, and appeared outgoing.
After three days, when her husband case to take her hose, she
reacted violently and relapsed into her previous condition. Her'
condition was apparently developing into a full—bloen psychosis.
Electroshock therapy was adninistered during the next week, and
although the patient showed improvement at first, she again relapsed into the previousaagiteted depressive condition.
No 5: KB, a 46—year-old shite-nnaerried resale with
Ca
paranoia delusions. was depressed and apathetic. She was
extra-sly
tense and anxious. and her grasp on reality was tenuous. Her
reaction to 10 a; of JB~329 see similar to that of the other
except that the hallucinations and disorientation lasted
patients,
up to 36 hours. Two days later, she appeared definitely anieated.
cheerful. and coegosed. When questioned about her past condition,
she replied, "I feel such more alert and don’t toel.depressed.
Strangely enough, this was one of the first things I noticed.
I feel new as it before the treat-ant I had been living in a [let
tee-dimensional eorld and I had sort of retreated into ayseli.
and nee, after this treatment, I feel I as out in the noraal
three-dioensional world. I feel such sore alive...I have lore
energy and enthusiasm.“ The patient resneed her work on the day
following.her discharge. She continued to shoe improve-ant during B
the next few weeks, although after one south-she appears to be
relapstng into her former state. She reported. however, that a
symptoms, which she referred to as a ”catatonic nightnere." a
condition during which sheeeeeaed to be conscious but was unable
to sore and which had existed for eany years before the treat—
aent, had coapletely disappeared and had not yet returned.
LCCT

'

DISCUSSION

Five cases have been presented which serve as pilot experiaents
in the application of the piperidyl bensilatee to patients
manifesting psychopathology. Of the five cases, the first and

�“-vv—l‘vrr‘vr‘n-I—vw—v'wvwbvu'

.V

‘1"N"x'-w-*,—-

meg-w,v—u—m- . mun—aw wr—
.

Wmuw‘aw—r

_..

wenhvvrv-"v'

Wham-1 rap. &gt;mvr-.-.—_—,WVgrnww.-m.n WK‘J'W‘ wm

~

wane—v -

.w u-‘nnw

-4the fourth can be considered eo experieentel ouccooeee but
therepeutic failures. These two particular ceeee have never
reepondod‘eell to any other for: of therapy, including electron
check and drugs.
In three case: (Noe. 2, 3, end 3) the single application of the
oxperiaentol dru; proved to he of therepeutic value. Cece: No.
2 and 3, who were unable to work for over e
before the oxyear
porieent, were able to do oo. Case No. 5, which is the neat
interesting of our small oxporieental group, wee working prior
to the experiment; but that petiont'e state-onto end our objective
observation are both indicative of the therapeutic effectivonoee
of the drug. Cece No. 4 proved to be a therapeutic failure with
reepect to the drug. but the patient aloe failed to recover
after electric convulsive trootnonte.,
All five canoe treated hed only one synptoa in cannon-~ooee
degree of doproeeion. The other most remarkable con-on feature
of cases No. 3, 3, 4, and 5 one an extreme infantile personality
which could not be expected to change after a eingle treatment
of whatever eort. If it were not for the fifth coco, where the
loot remarkable ohengee were produced, this drug, 38-329 and ite
con¢enere could be earmarked for the treatment of depreoeive
otateo only. In the fifth case, however, beneath the light
dopreeeion were deeper disturbances of thinking end perception
eluding superficial observation. In effect, ehe eee psychotic.
lhethor her perticular paranoid state ehoold be diegnoeod ae
latent eohieophrenie, effeltivo paychooie, or achieophroniforio beside the point. The ieportance of this case io that it
indicates some usefulness of the piperidyl benziletee in e
patient eith lurked perceptual and cognitive dieturbenooo.
There are a great nu-ber of questions uneneeered by thie proliainary experiment. Both the extent and duration of leproveaent
have not been fully aeeoeeod. It reneino to be detereinod
1) whether repelted adainietretion of the drug in hallucinogenic
doeeo would have produced a greater degree of improvement in the
eueceeefei canoe and total or partial leproveaont in the unseen
ooeeful fourth cone; or 2) whether the production of the poychotogonic etete ie necoeeery et oil to produce ieprovenent; or
3) if deily repeated small doses of the drug for an extended
time would have produced the care but clover iiproveoent. Both
the effect end proper doeege ochedule of e aeintonenco ascent
of JB-329 have yet to be determined. Finally, the proper field
of application of this drug in peychiatry ie in doubt. do for
co the cxporieentol results on nornel and pathologic etheoto
permit any conclueion, the drug would be epglicable to depree~
eive etetee. Our fifth case. however, reieee some slight hope
that JB-329 or related derivetivee night be useful in treating
the grove personality dieordere cocoonly diagnosed an albino.

,

-

a

phrenil.

L

of enticholinergic egonte in the treetaont of eohieophroeie
ie not nee. Forror and eo~eorkere (4) odainieterod very large

The nee

'10.!"me

�W

“u—wmumw—HWM‘ w ,

y:-

m ;«m«

mu, 7-"
v

mlm“

wﬂwnm—u‘u—w“ Imam. m... .. -.

. .r t i . a r n . -

_

_

i n. --'—-'-v&gt;-vv_uru'v

»

'I‘uﬂv-"vWO4‘m‘ &lt;‘AmevN’--ww z-ew11IUI'm—rl—I-

.5doses (up to 200 mg) of atropine intramuscnlerly to schizophrenics
seniteetinc eose degree of anxiety. [Such doses of atropine produced core; but nest of tho psychotogonic and stisuleting notions
achieved with JB—329 were absent. It remains to be seen whether
the besic eeoheniss ot-thooe tvo nodes of therapy is sisiler,
although our findings suggest that atropine is devoid of the
exceesive stimulating properties of JB~329. LSD—38,_enother
hellnoinogen, has been used therapeutically in treating psychotics,
lsrsely es en edJunct to psychotherapy or electroshock convul—

sions (5, 6).
With regard to the code of sction hardly more can be said than
that the substance has definite enticholinorgic properties, but
evidence thet the central ettect itself involved cholisergic
blocksde is locking (1, 3). The piperidyl bensiletes in smaller
doses produce facilitation of sotor neurons (Renshee cells) in
the lesbsr region of the cat‘s spinal cord, while larger doses
produced couplete inhibition (7). Acetylcholine is presumed
to be a mediator in Renshew cells which are believed to exercise
a generalized sup reesion in motor neurons innervating okeletel
soocle.v Kiseich ‘8) hes demonstrated en inhibition of electricel
activity in the reticular bulber forention of the rabbit with
2.5 eg/kg of JB~329. in contradictincticn to LSD, which in exci~
tetory. Such neurophysiologicel studies are merely prelisinsry
end. although they say oxplsin certain effects of the drug, such
es hyporrcrlexie. considerably more work of this sort releins to

be done.

clinical results with the drug are even more obscure, perticnlerly since the therepentic effects become apparent long
after the hellucinatione and autonomic sysgtoss have disappeared. Furthersoro, otudieo on animals indicate that the drug
is rcedilg hydrolyzed in the body, and is completely elisineted
in 24-48 ours.. One can only conclude, therefore, that therapeutic effects are related to the drug in a secondary manner.
The piperidyl beneilntos probably serve es a trigger necheniss
for e long series of neuroohysiologicol effects resulting in the
inprevelent in the pstient s psychopathslogicel etstns. Sub~
sequent clinioel work ie oiled at working out proper dosage
schedules, on well no the indications for the use of this and
other related drugs.
The

SUMMARY

entioholinergic psychotonimetic agent, Noethyl-3~piperidyl
cyclopentylphenyl glycolote (JR-329), has been used in the treat~
sent of e snail author of depreeeed patients. The drug induces
e drive of eotivity eccosponied by sons sood elevation. This
sceningly desirable effect tron s therapist's viewpoint occurs
after e period in which there are psychopathologicel effects or
s definitely psychotic nature. The post~psychotic effects which
sees desirable are of a prolonged duretion (days to reeks possibly).
There is st least all ht evidence in two casee or e continuing
stete of isprovenent n inte3retion of the mental functioning and
A

new

behavior.

'

�.

,w... E.

n‘vw-“m-w~'mwwm‘w‘m‘—Iw

—

,.,

-—-

--——-

q"r.xr)r.«,"l‘w

wine—uw.w

m_m

,

.v

.

w-..-....w w. m—u—wnm .c

up... (“mu—r
.

.- "le-

REFERENCES

l.

6., Oetfeld,

N., and Biol, J. A new group
of peychotceieetic egente. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. end ﬂed.,
Ahead, L.

A.

97: 433, 1958.

2.

Oetteld. A. l., Ahead, L. 6., end Hercne, D. A. Studies
with cerulopleeein end e nee hellucinogea. A.M.A. Arch.
Neurol. and Peychiet.. 79: 317, 1958.
Abuod. L. 6., 03:5.1a. A. u., and 31.1, a. Structure~
activity roletionehipe of Supiperidyl heneiletee with
peychotcgenic propertiee. Arch. Int. Phereecody. ct
Thor. (in prose, 1958).
Forrer, G. R. AtrOplne toxicity there_y in the treatment
of aental dieeese. AI. J. Paychiet., 08: 107, 1951.
Just, F., and Penal, ﬂ. Proepective peychietry. Inch. Mod.
ﬁche-chr.. 99: 889, 1957.
Sandlson, R. A., end Whitelae, J. D. A. Further etudiee
in the therapeutic velue of LSD in eentel(illnees. J.
»

3.

4.
5.

6.
7.
8.

Heat. Sci., 103: 332, 1957.
Ueki, 8., hiehi, 8., end chcteu, K.
Hieeich. K. Persoael coneunicetion.

Personal communication.

Foorxowas
‘

Syntheeieed bf Dr. John Biel, Lekeeide Leboretoriee,
Hilveukee, Wieceeein.

authors ere deeply lndebteﬂ to Dr. F. J. Gerty for hie eeny
invaluable suggeetione, end to Dr. Alec K. Roeeneeld for the
plydhalogicel teete.
Aiéed by greute free the Mental Health Fund, Stete at Illincie.
end the Teegle Foundation.
The

�Institute of Human Nutrition, Praha,
(J. Mast-k)
A

PSYCHOSIS CAUSED BY BENACTYZIN INTOXICATION
Minis VoJ'i‘cmuovsm"

The dimethylaminoethyl ester of benzylic acid is known in the literature by the following names: Benaetyzin, Suavitil, Parasan. It was
synthesized in 1936 in the CIBA Laboratories in Switzerland as a spasmolytic agent, but it was not until 1955 that it first came to be used in
psychiatry by Munkuad &amp; Jacobsen, where it proved to be a useful
tool for decreasing anxiety and psychic tension, without having any
hypnotic side effect. During the following two years it was roughly
investigated for both its clinical and pharmacological qualities and was
applied to many patients in various institutions. The specific action
of this drug upon the central nervous system placed it, together with the
tranquilizers, on the level of the leading modern psychopharmacological agents. For its composition and central nervous action it was called
an “antiphobic” agent, while its chemical structure ranged it among the
diphcnylmethanes having a central nervous effect (together with e.g.
Meratran. Frenquel, or Atarax). 'I‘herapeutically it is used more commonly in cases of neurosis than in psychotic cases. Its pharmacological
and clinical attributes have been described thoroughly in other publications. This substance was also synthesized in Czechoslovakia, in
the Laboratories of the Institute for Research in Pharmacology and
Biochemistry and has been tested since May 1956 in several clinical
institutions (Dr. Hanzlic‘ek, Dr. Vina‘r’, Dr. Vojté’chovsk‘y). The results
of these tests have been published elsewhere. At the clinical department
of the Institute of Human Nutrition we administer Benactyzin in the
therapy of some gastrointestinal diseases.
Thus we had an opportunity to observe the course of an acute intoxication, which we refer to in the following case history. It was the enormous size of the dose used, fifteen times greater than described in the
literature (Jacobsen (1955)— 90 mg). as well as the fact that to our
knowledge it is the only case where psychotic symptoms appeared,
which stimulated the communication.

.43, .

i

�A

PSYCHOSIS CAUSED BY BENACTYZIN INTOXICATION
MILos

\’o.1'r1'«:1;11ovs1\'\"

The dimethylaminocthyl ester of benzylic acid is known in the literature by the following names: Benactyzin, Suavitil, Parasan. It was
synthesized in 1936 in the CIBA Laboratories in Switzerland as a spasmolytic agent, but it was not until 1955 that it first came to be used in
psychiatry by Munkvad &amp; Jacobsen, where it proved to be a useful
tool for decreasing anxiety and psychic tension, without having any
hypnotic side effect. During the following two years it was roughly
investigated for both its clinical and pharmacological qualities and was
applied to many patients in various institutions. The specific action
of this drug upon the central nervous system placed it, together with the
tranquilizers, on the level of the leading modern psychopharmacological agents. For its composition and central nervous action it was called
an “antiphobic” agent, while its chemical structure ranged it among the
diphenylmcthanes having a central nervous effect (together with e.g.
Meratran, Frenquel, or Atarax). Therapeutically it is used more commonlyin cases of neurosis than1n psychotic cases. Its pharmacological
and clinical attributes have been described thoroughly in other publications. This substance was also synthesized in Czechoslovakia, in
the Laboratories of the Institute for Research in Pharmacology and
Biochemistry and has been tested since May 1956 in several clinical
institutions (Dr. Hanzlié’ek, Dr. Vina‘r’, Dr. Vojféchovsk'y). The results
of these tests have been published elsewhere. At the clinical department
of the Institute of Human Nutrition we administer Benactyzin in the
therapy of some gastrointestinal diseases.
Thus we had an opportunity to observe the course of an acute intoxication, which we refer to in the following case history. It was the enormous size of the dose used. fifteen times greater than described in the
literature (Jacobsen (1955)— 90 mg), as well as the fact that to our
knowledge it is the only case where psychotic symptoms appeared,
which stimulated the communication.

�515
CASE HISTORY
L.B., a 29 year old married female, a physician by profession,

with a sensitivepersonality, but without previous psychiatric symptoms, during a short period of
emotional excitement following some misunderstanding with her husband, consumed almost a teaspoonful of pure Benactyzin. (During the reconstruction of the
case it was ascertained by weighing approximately the same amount of the drug,
that the patient had consumed about 1300—1400 mg of Benactyzin). It was used
solely for its soothing effect without any intention of committing suicide. The course
taken by the intoxication, as described by the patient herself and corroborated by
her husband and the physician summoned to the case, was as follows: About ten
to fifteen minutes after taking the drug the patient became confused, she felt as
if she were looking at herself and her surroundings from a distance is; as if everything was running away from her. She expected to faint, but remained seated
quietly on the sofa. After about twenty minutes she became agitated and leaving
her seat walked in a very unstable manner to the bathroom to take a shower.
There she noticed in the semi-darkness a pile of laundry lying on the floor, and on
top of it she suddenly saw her six months old son. Let us continue in the patient’s
own words. “I was unable to realize at the time that this could not be true since
the baby was actually at home with his grandmother. As I kept looking the baby
suddenly turned pale, then yellow, his eye-balls deviated to one side and he appeared to be on the verge of dying. Finally, before my very eyes, he started fading
away and disappeared. In a wild attempt to find him I searched among the laundry
and then, feeling completely desperate, I ran out to seek an injection for him. My
husband prevented me from going out. I accused him of being the cause of our
baby's possible death.” According to the husband there followed a short struggle
and the patient was compelled to remain in the room. What occurred in the next
period is covered by amnesia (that is between the twentieth and the fiftieth minute),
and it is the husband alone who continues the description of the case as follows.
“She showed signs of anxiety and her face held a terrified expression. Her orientation in space was altered, when she tried to seize an object she would miss it
by about 20 cm, she would also miss the chair when trying to sit down. She became
more.and more agitated and repeatedly tried to run into the corridor, even though
she was only partly dressed, with the persistent idea of obtaining the injection for
saving her child. A short time later, having managed to escape, she was found on
another floor, in vain seeking an opening into a wardrobe and talking confusedly
about the death of her baby. She was brought back into the room, where she became
slightly calmer." The patient is able to continue the description of the events which
followed (that is about an hour after the consumption of the drug), as the amnesia was lifted for this period. “I tried to understand that I could not really have
seen the baby, since he was not there, but whenever I thought about him the whole
situation appeared again very clearly before my eyes and I felt a terrible anxiety.
At this time I partly realized that I had only suffered from a hallucination. I tried
to focus my mind on my surroundings and the conversation, but my thinking was
disrupted and l was unable to integrate individual notions into a logical whole,
even though I did partly realize the inadequacy and incoordination of the words I
used. I believe I even repeated certain phrases stereotypically.”
At this time, that is between the first and second hour of 'the intoxication, the
physician, who had been summoned, noted considerable psychomotor excitation,
agitation, inadequate behaviour and inadequate answers to questions and diagnosed
33

ac-ra rarcu.

rr NIUIOL. scan, 33, 4

�516
psychotic state. The patient confessed having taken a large dose of Benactyzin,
but resolutely denied any suicidal intention. Her face was flushed and showed signs
of crying, her pupils were dilated and she looked terrified, her pulse was 921 min.,
her blood pressure was not recorded. Caffeine and coramine Were applied hypodermically. The patient violently protested against taking the injection saying,
“Do not give it to me, but to my son, who is dying.” Two hours later, when the
physician saw the patient once more, there were still slight signs of psychomotor
agitation and emotional instability, but the patient had just experienced a critical
attitude towards the hallucination and psychotic state.
In her story the patient describes her feelings during the period between the
second and fourth hour after consumption as follows: “After the injection I felt
roughly normal. I realized the impossibility of what I had seen, but I still remembered it with a feeling of terror.” Her husband observed that she became calmer
after the injection, but her speech was still inadequate.
Four hours after taking the drug she became normal, but was very tired and
sleeply. An hour later, that is five hours after taking Benactyzin, she was able to
ride home on the bus. Then she spent a quiet night, and the following day she was
without symptoms.
a

EPICRISIS

Ten to twenty minutes after consumption of 1300—1400 mg of pure
Benactyzin a 29 year old married and mentally healthy female, a physician by profession, showed signs of indisposition, ataxia and derealisation, later there appeared psychomotor excitation and a temporary true
optical hallucination showing the horrible image of the death of the
patient’s baby. This experience led to great anxiety and psychomotor
excitation and the whole behaviour was centered on saving the baby. In
the period between the twentieth and fiftieth minute of the intoxication the patient passed into a delirious state, wih confused consciousness and followed by amnesia. This stage was characterized
by the appearance of a secondary delusion about the death of the
child and accompanied by aggressive behaviour motivated by the wish
to save him. Thinking was incoherent, there was a feeling of blocking
of the thoughts with a strong accentuation on anxiety, agitation and
ataxia. The physician who examined the patient some time between the
first and second hour after the intoxication, noted a psychotic state
with signs of agitation, inadequate answers to questions, and the delusion about the death of her baby. Upon physical examination a flushed
face, dilated pupils, and tachycardia were observed. The psychomotor
agitation decreased after the application of coramine and coffeine and
there arose a critical attitude towards the hallucination and delusion
experienced, but the emotional bond to their memory remained. Disorders in thinking stood out foremost (blocking of the thoughts). These
were apparent in the form of incoherence and perseveration. Three or
four hours later the psychotic state had definitely ceased and was re9

�517

placed by tiredness and sleepiness. After this phase there were no further complications.
DISCUSSION

The toxic dose of Benactyzin has not been ascertained for man. Experiments on the human subject were made impossible by the marked
effect of even small doses of the drug upon the central nervous system,
as may be observed both clinically and on the electroencephalogram
(Coady &amp; Jewesbury 1956). After a dose of four to six mg of Benactyzin, the following unfavourable side effects were described: dizziness,
apathy, relaxation of the muscles, a dull feeling of the extremities, as
if they were not connected with the body, sluggish thinking and lowered
attention, decreased reactivity to external stimuli, blocking of the
thoughts, derealisation, ataxia. Among the symptoms of disturbance
of the vegetative nervous system, it was especially dryness of the mouth
and palpations which stood out. The side effects described above occur
in about 40 per cent. of the patients treated, causing a marked decrease in the therapeutic value of Benactyzin. The dose used to date
never surpassed 90 mg (per single dose) and were never accompanied
by qualitative disturbances in thinking or hallucinations or. confusion
(Jacobsen 1955).
The Benactyzin intoxication described above (about 1300 mg) was
characterized by a delirious psychotic episode with a brief optical hallucination, followed by a secondary delusion, confusion, and psychotic
behaviour. Before and after the delirious state in our case, there were
the other side effects commonly described in the literature, namely
ataxia, derealisation, and blocking of the thoughts. The atropine-like
visceral effects which could be expected after such a large dose of the
drug were not felt by the patient herself even though they could be
observed to a small extent (tachycardia, flushed face, dilated pupils).
The psychotic course of the intoxication could be explained by the specific and quantitative action of Benactyzin upon the central nervous
system. While the theme of the psychotic episode might well be understood psychodynamically: a sensitive mother whose main problem of
life is the health of her six months old child, the optical hallucination
may be the realisation of her fears.
The relatively benign course and short duration of this intoxication
and the negligible visceral symptoms which accompanied it, even
though the dose taken surpassed therapeutic dosages more than a
thousandfold, denote a relatively low toxicity of Benactyzin. On the
other hand this case only accentuates the predominative action of this
drug on the central nervous system.
33‘

�518
SUMMARY

The clinical course of an intoxication by about 1300 mg of Benactyzin characterized by a short benign delirious psychotic state is
described.
REFERENCES

GeseIIscha/l f. chem. Iniluslrie, Basel, Schw. Pat. No. 183065, 187825, 1936.
(.‘oady, A., &amp; E. C. 0.1ewesbury (1956): A clinical trial of benactyzine hydrochloride
(“Suavitil”) as a physical relaxant. Brit. med. J. 1, 485—87.
Davies, If. B. (1956): A new drug to relieve anxiety. Brit. Med. J. 1, 480—84.
Jaeobsen, E. (1955): A new drug efective on the central nervous system. Dan. Med.
Bull. 2, 159-160.
Jacobsen, E., A. Kehler, V. Larsen, I. Munkvad &amp; K. Skinhaj (1955): Investigations
into autonomic responses during emotion. Acta psychiat. (Kbh.) 30, 607—25.
Jensen, 0. ”slergaard (1955): Suavitil in the treatment of psychoneuroses. Dan.
Med. Bull. 2, 14043.
Munkvad, I. (1955): Treatment of psychoses and psychoneuroses with a new sedative (Suavitil). Acta psychiat. (Kbh.) 30, 729—39.
Vinar, D., M. Vojté'chovskﬁ &amp; Vinarova’ (1958) : Cas. lik. Ees. (Prague), in press.
,

Received April 4, 1958.

Milo} Vojtéchovsk)", M.D.,
Praha XIV, Budéjovika 800,
Czechoslovakia.

�Reprinted from Psychotropic Drugs

THE COMPARISON OF THE PSYCHOTIC EFFECT OF
TRYPTAMINE DERIVATIVES WITH THE EFFECTS OF MESCALINE
AND LSD-25 IN SELF—EXPERIMENTS
S. SZARA

Central State Institute for Nervous and Mental Diseases, Budapest (Hungary);
Forsehungsabteilung, Psychiatrisehe und Nervenklinik der Freien Universitat, Berlin (Germany)

INTRODUCTION

\

Indolealkylamines have been considered for a long time as a group of active substances
of rather slight pharmacological and almost no psychiatric interest. Renewed attention
has been focused on them since the discovery of the presence of 5-hydroxytryptamine
in blood, in the enterochromafﬁn cell system, spleen, kidney, and the central and
peripheral nervous tissue. An excellent review on the pharmacology of indolealkylamines by ERSPAMER appeared in 1954, and many other reviews have appeared on
5-hydroxytryptamine or serotonin (AMIN et al.1; FREYBERGER et al.11; GADDUM
et al.12; HIMWICH13; LANGEMANN17 ; PAGE2"; ROTHLIN). The tryptamine derivatives
have been of interest only in connection with their effect on blood pressure. Data on
their effect on the central nervous system can be found only sporadically (NIEUWENHUIZENlS; SPEETER AND ANTHONY“). Our attention towards their possible psychotic
action was attracted by the works of FISH, JOHNSON, AND HORNING9 on Ptptaa’enta
alkaloids among which they found bufotenine, N,N-dimethyltryptamine, and their
N -oxides. In experiments on animal they found these drugs to have psychotic effects,
but experiments on humans were made only with bufotenin by FABING. We therefore
decided to make self-experiments and experiments on normal volunteers with N,Ndimethyltryptamine and with the N,N-diethyl compound also (Fig. I).
Bufotenine

HG

I

/\ANH/
l

I

l

CH2CH2 N(CH3)2
C

(WCHZCHz-N(CH3)2

DMT

“

T—g

l

\ANH

/\j—j—
\NH

CH 2 CH 2 -NCH
(2 5)2

Fig. I. The chemical constitution
of bufotenine. DMT and T—9.
References

1).

466.

�PSYCHOTIC EFFECTS

or

DMT,

r-g,

461

MESCALINE, AND LSD-25

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The N,N—dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and the N,N-diethyltryptamine (T-g) were
obtained synthetically by the method of SPEETER AND ANTHONY.
For the purpose of puriﬁcation the amines were distilled in high vacuum. For the
experiments, sterile aqueous solutions of the hydrochloric salts were prepared and
used in a concentration of 30 mg per ml. The lethal doses estimated in white mice by
the usual method were 135 mg/kg in the case of DMT, and I20 mg/kg in the case
of T-9.

'

Although the substances have been not very toxic in mice, we were very cautious
in the self-experiments.
In the peroral experiments, starting from 14 mg and increasing the dose up to
150 mg no observable psychic or vegetative effects were found. After the unsuccessful
peroral experiments, intramuscular experiments were made. In this titration series
other physicians of the Institute of Budapest took part. The doses administered were
IO mg, increasing to 150 mg (zle. 2 mg/kg body weight). Psychotic effects were observed from 30 mg, Le. 0.2 mg/kg body weight; they reached their optimum in doses
about 0.7—1.0 mg/kg body weight. On further increasing the doses the psychotic
symptoms were suppressed by the vegetative and organic symptoms. Therefore the
further experiments on normal volunteers were made with the above-mentioned
optimal dose. A detailed paper on the results obtained with normal volunteers, is
to appear in Psychiatria at N eurologica (SAI—HALASZ et al.22).
THE SELF-EXPERIMENTS

The purpose of this report is to compare the psychotic effect of tryptamine derivatives
with the well-known effect of mescaline and lysergic acid diethylamide in self—
experiments. I believe that this method of experimentation is one of the best ways
of obtaining direct information on subtle psychopathological phenomena, which are
of great importance in understanding the schizophrenic syndrome.
TABLE I
THE DATA OF SELF-EXPERIMENTS
Dose

Substance

I.

Mescaline
II. LSD-25
III. DMT
DMT
DMT
DMT
IV. T-9

0.35 g

IOO lug

0.25 mg—I 50 mg
75 mg
75

mg

60 .mg
60 mg

A dmin.

Date

per 05
per 05
per os
i.m.

Dec. 1955
Dec. 1956

i.m.
i.m.
i.m.

March—April 19 56
April 1956
June 1956
March 1957
Nov. 1956

Place

Budapest
Vienna
Budapest
Budapest
Debrecen
Berlin
Budapest

The experiments were carried out over a period of 16 months. I took mescaline
at Christmas—time 1955, and the LSD—25 was tested in Vienna at the Psychiatric Clinic
of the University, by courtesy of Prof. Dr. HOFF and Docent Dr. ARNOLD, in De—
cember 1956. The ﬁrst intramuscular administration of DMT occurred at the end of
April 1956, and was followed by the experiments on normal volunteers. We reported
References

1).

466.

'

�s. szARA

462

the results at the Annual Meeting of the Hungarian Physiological Society in Debrecen.
During this meeting I made the second intramuscular experiment in order to get an
electroencephalographic recording. A third DMT—experiment and some biochemical
investigations were made in Berlin at the Research Department of the Psychiatric
and Neurologic Clinic of the Free University, by the courtesy of Prof. Dr. SELBACH.
The T—g—experiment was made intramuscularly in November 1956 in Budapest.
I shall not go into details about the effects of mescaline and LSD-25 becauseI
am not able to add any new aspects to that well—known picture. Nevertheless, the
chief features of these experiments will be mentioned later. At present I shall only
describe in more detail the symptoms of DMT and T—g model psychoses, in View of
the lack of such reports in the literature up to now.
(a) The BAIT—experiments

As mentioned above, DMT ingested per as has no observable effect. But an intramuscular injection of 30 mg could already produce some mydriasis and subjectively
some perceptiOn disturbances. The larger the dose, the more striking are the symptoms.
About the self—experiment made with 1.0 mg/kg, Le. 75 mg DMT in total, I can report

the following:
In the third or fourth minute after the injection vegetative symptoms appeared,
such as tingling sensation, trembling, slight nausea, mydriasis, elevation of the blood
pressure and increase of the pulse rate. At the same time eidetic phenomena, optical
illusions, pseudo—hallucinations, and later real hallucinations, appeared. The halluci—
nations consisted of moving, brilliantly coloured oriental motifs, and later I saw
wonderful scenes altering very rapidly. The faces of the people seemed to be masks.
My emotional state was elevated sometimes up to euphoria. At the highest point I had
compulsive athetoid movements in my left hand. My consciousness was completely
ﬁlled by hallucinations, and my attention was ﬁrmly bound to them; therefore I
could not give an account of the events happening around me. After %—I hour the
symptoms disappeared, and I was able to describe What had happened.
In the second intramuscular DMT-experiment, the duration in time and the
symptoms were mamiy the same.
At the third DMT-experiment, the dose was somewhat smaller (60 mg); the
symptoms were thus milder, but qualitatively the same.
(b)

The T—g—exyberimem

The symptoms of the T-g—experiment are brieﬂy as follows. About 15 minutes after
the injection of 60 mg of T-g came the same vegetative symptoms as described for
DMT. The illusions, hallucinations, and the athetoid compulsive movements in the
left hand were the same as for DMT. But the alteration of the surrounding world
and the emotional reaction to them were strong and impressive. The mask-like faces
of the' persons, the dream-like mysteriousness of the objects and the room gave me
the feelnig that I had arrived in another world, entirely different and queer and full
of secrecy and mystery. This wonderful but strange world attracted me at one
moment, but the next moment I did not want to accept it. I became perplexed; I did
not know what I ought to do. I began to walk anxiously up and down, and said:
”I ought to do something, I must!” There was a peculiar double orientation in space
References p. 466.

�463

PSYCHOTIC EFFECTS OF DMT, T-9, MESCALINE, AND LSD-25

and time: I knew where I was, but I was inclined to accept this strange world as a
reality, too. The dusk of the room was lightened for some minutes, and again the
light was switched off, and that seemed to me as if this period might be an entire
epoch, ﬁlled with events and happenings, but at same time I knew that only several
minutes had passed.
(6)

The comparison of the results

I should like to compare the effects of the two tryptamine derivatives outlined above
with the effect of mescaline and LSD-25. The most outstanding differences can be
established in their time of duration.
Intensity
of symptoms
T-9

DMT

LSD-25

Mescalin

Flg. 2. Schematic course of the self-experiments.

_

In Fig. 2 it can be seen that the duration of the DMT-induced model psychosis
is about one hour, that of T—g is about three hours, while the LSD— and mescaline
symptoms lasted for 8—10 hours. The onset of the symptoms in the case of tryptamine
derivatives is wsentially quicker than the onset of the others. The elevation of the dose
of DMT did not produce a longer state of intoxication, but the symptoms were more
organic. It is remarkable that in all the four model psychoses the symptoms developed
and passed away in wave form.
The specialsymptoms are demonstrated in Table II.
TABLE II
THE MAIN SYMPTOMS OBSERVED IN SELF-EXPERIMENTS
Symptoms

I. Vegetative symptoms
2. Athetoid movements
3- IIIUSiODS

4. Hallucinations
5. Disturbances of

a. spatial perception
b. time perception
6. Bodily sensations
7. Depersonalisation

Emotional reaction
a. euphory
b. anxiety
9. Autism
10. Language changes
8.

References

1).

466.

Mescaline

DM T

LSD-2 5

T- 9

Preceded the other symptoms Coincided with the other symptoms
—
+
+

++

++
—

_

I

+++
+
+
++

+++
+
++
+ ++

+

—_

—
-—
~——

+++
++

—|—

++

_+

'

,

+++
+

+++
+
+
+

+++
++ +
+
+++

++

+++
+
+++

___

+++

_+

�464

s.

SZA'RA

As can be seen, the different symptoms were not
equally apparent in every case.
(I) The vegetative symptoms in mescaline and LSD-25 preceded the
other symptoms, while in the case of the tryptamine derivatives the
disturbances

sensory

appeared

as early as the vegetative symptoms began.
(2) An interesting phenomenon observed only in the
tryptamine derivatives was
the appearance Of athetoid, choreiform compulsive movements. As
far as I know,
these symptoms have not yet been described in the
case of other hallucinogenic

substancesf
(3) The perceptional disturbances are
qualitatively the same for all the substances;
only quantitative differences could be observed.
(4) The emotional reactions, however, were
qualitatively different, viz. my
reaction to mescaline and DMT was euphoric, to the LSD—25
anxious, but in the case
of T-9 euphoria and anxiety alternated. These
phenomena, together with the severe
autism and the above-mentioned ambivalency were observed
only in T-g. However,
it is well—known from the literature that it can occur in the
case of mescalnie and
‘

LSD-25 also (HUXLEY14, SOLM523).
The comparison shows that the structure of a model
psychosis, which can be
considered as a form of the acute exogen reaction
type (BONHOEFFER), depends on
the chemical structure of the causative agent,
apart from the fact that absorption,
metabolic and excretion processes may determine the course in time.
BIOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATIONS

v

‘

The rapid onset and the short duration of the symptoms in the DMT—induced
state is
very interesting from a biochemical point of View, and it is probably connected with
the rapid metabolism of DMT (FISH ct LIL).
We know from the investigation of ERSPAMER6 that in rats the
main breakdown
product of DMT is 3—indolylacetic acid (3-IAA) which is excreted in the urine
partly
in free form, but largely bound to glycocol as indolaceturic acid. We
investigated the
excreted indole derivatives in the human volunteers chromatographically
and photo—
metrically, and obtained the same results as ERSPAMER (SZARA25). In addition,
an
interesting phenomenon was observed (Table III). We found in the urine after
a
larger
dose of DMT more 5-hydroxyindolylacetic acid (5-HIAA) excreted
than was normally
present. Unchanged DMT was not estimated in the urine extracts. These data
suggested
TABLE III
TOTAL 5-HIAA EXCRETED

THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF
AND AFTER THE
N 0.

I

2M

3‘”
4
*

Dose of DM T

150 mg

I50 mg
75 mg
60 mg

IN A 6

DMT EXPERIMENT

h PERIOD BEFORE

Amount of 5-HIAA*

alter expt.

1.0 mg
1.2 mg
1.5 mg

2.0 mg

before expt.

3.0 mg
3.0 mg
1.2 mg
L5 mg

Estimated by two-dimensional chromatography, developed with
p-dimethylaminO-benzalde‘and
the
hyde,
eluted spots measured colorimetrically.
**
Self-experiments.

References p. 466.

�PSYCHOTIC EFFECTS OF DMT, T-g, MESCALINE, AND LSD-25

465

that the DMT is very rapidly metabolized, and perhaps displays its effects by means
of serotonin. In order to obtain more information about the relationship in the blood,
I made an experiment with 60 mg DMT. The extracts of I5 ml blood taken before,
and IO, 30 and 90 minutes after the experiment, were chromatographically investigated,
and I found qualitatively only two indol derivatives, namely tryptophan and 3—IAA,
but no serotonin 5—HIAA or unchanged DMT could be demonstrated. The 3—IAA
level of the blood was elevated in the 10th and 30th minute (Fig. 3).
3- 1AA

lug p.c.
100

50

10
_

30

._+.&gt;
90
minutes

Time in
after injection of DMT
_

.

Fig. 3. The 3-IAA level of blood during the DMT experiment.

This ﬁnding did not support the presumption that serotonin plays a role in the
psychotic effect of tryptamine derivatives. The evidence, however, is not sufﬁcient
to allow one to draw deﬁnite conclusions in this respect.
DISCUSSION

In discussing the mechanism of action of tryptamine derivatives, it must be admitted
that at present there is no deﬁnite knowledge about the biochemical mechanism of
action. The clinical picture, however, taking the other experiments on normal
volunteers also into consideration, enables us to give some information concerning
this mechanism.
The rapid onset of the psychotic symptoms makes it seem probable that DMT
affects directly those brain structures that are affected indirectly by LSD and mescaline (BLOCKZ). The appearance of choreiform athetoid movements is possibly due
to an effect on structures other than those affected by LSD or mescaline. The tryp—
tamine derivatives seem to be the ﬁrst hallucinogenic substances to cause athetoid
movements, and should therefore provide a new tool for investigating experimentally
the exact mechanism of this phenomenon.
Unfortunately, I have not enough time to develop in detail the very interesting
psychopathological symptoms of T—g, which reminded me of the conception of the
“schizophrene Grundstimmung”, described by WYRSCH27.
It is, however, very remarkable that tryptamine derivatives without the OHgroup in the 5-position are able to produce mental phenomena. As UDENFRIEND at al.
demonstrated in animal tissues, there is no enzyme that could decarboxylate trypto—
phan to produce tryptamine; it is assumed therefore that only the enteral bacteria
can produce this substance.
‘

References p. 466.

�s. szARA

466

There is a possibility that from this tryptamine the schizophrenic organism may
is
It
noteworthy
in
the
enzymically.
substances
way
hallucinogenic
wrong
produce
in
of
disturbance
evidence
team4
a
his
BUSCAINO
presented
and
recently
Prof.
that
be
desirable.
would
ﬁeld
in
this
work
Further
in
schizophrenia.
metabolism
indole
the
SUMMARY
The psychotic effects of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and N,N-diethy1tryptamine (T—9) have
been compared with the effects of mescaline and LSD-2 5.
The most outstanding features of DMT model psychosis are the rapid onset and the short
duration Of the symptoms. This may indicate a different mechanism of action from that of LSD
and mescaline.
New symptoms appearing with both tryptamine derivatives are the choreiform athetoid
movements. This phenomon could be a new tool for investigating experimentally the mechanism of
the extrapyramidal compulsive movements.
of
indole
and
aminotoxic
the
theory
Of
derivatives
supports
effects
tryptamine
The psychotic
schizophrenia.

REFERENCES

].

Physiol. (London), 126, (1954) 596.
A. H. AMIN, T. B. B. CRAWFORD AND I. H. GADDUM,
2 W. BLOCK, Z. physiol. Chem.,
294 (1953) 1; lbid., 294 (1953) 49; ibid., 296 (1954) 1; ibid., 296
(I954) 1083
V. M. BUSCAINO, Quaderni aeta neural, (1953).
4 V. M. BUSCAINO, D. KEMALI, R. BAGNULO, Aeta Neural. (Naples), 10 (1955) 547.
5
V. ERSPAMER, Pharmacol. Rev., 6 (1954) 425.
6 V. ERSPAMER,
118.
(1955)
(London),
127
Physiol.
].
7
H. D. FABING, Am. ]. Psychiat, 113 (1956) 409.
8
H. D. FABING AND J. R. HAWKINS, Science, 123 (1956) 886.
9 M. S.
FISH, N. M. JOHNSON AND E. C. HORNING, ]. Am. Chem. 500., 77 (1955) 5892.
10 M. S. FISH, N. M. JOHNSON, E. P. LAWRENCE, E. C. HORNING, Blaehim. Biophys. Aeta., 18
(1955) 56411 W. A. FREYBURGER, B. E. GRAHAM, M. M. RAPPORT, P. H. SEAY, W. M. GOVIER,O. F. SWOAP
AND M. J. VANDER BROOK, ]. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap., 105 (1952) 80.
12 I. H. GADDUM AND A. HAMEED KHAN, Brit. ]. Pharmacol., 9 (1954) 240.
13 H. E. HIMWICH,
Nervous Mental Disease, 127 (1955) 413.
].
14 A. HUXLEY, The Doors of Perception, London, 1954.
15 D. KEMALI, V. M. BUSCAINO AND R. BALBI, Aeta Neural. (Naples), 11 (1956) 209.
16 D. KEMALI AND G. ROMANO, Aeta Neural. (Naples), 11 (1956) 959.
17 H. LANGEMANN, Sehwelz. med. Waehsehr., 85 (1957) 957.
(9).
(1936)
18 F.
Amsterdam,
Akad.
Koninkl.
Wetensehap,
39
Proc.
NIEUWENHUYZEN,
J.
19 I. H. PAGE,
Pharmaeal. Exptl. Therap., 105 (1952) 58.
].
20 I. H. PAGE, Physlal. Revs, 34 (1954) 563.
21 E. ROTHLIN, A. CERLETTI, A. KONZETT, W. R. SCHALCH AND M. TAESCHLER, Experientia, 12
(1956) 15422 A. SAI-HALASZ, GY. BRUNECKER AND S. SzARA, Psychiat. et Neurol., (in press).
23 H. SOLMs, Praxis,
45 (1956) 746.
24 M. E. SPEETER AND W. C. ANTHONY,
Am. Chem. 500., 76 (1954) 6208.
25 S. SzARA,
Experientia, 12 (1956) 441.
23 S. UDENFRIEND, C. T. CLARK AND E. TITUS, ]. Am. Chem. 500., 75 (1953) 501.
Daseinwer’se. Paul
27
Psychologie.
Klinlk,
Studlen
des
zur
Die
Person
Sehlzophrenen.
WYRSCH,
J.
Haupt, Bern, 1949.
1

j.

'

DISCUSSION
A. SAI—HALAsz, I stltuto Centrale per le malattie Nervose e M entali, Budapest (Ungheria)

Il collega SzARA ha avutO occasione stamane di parlare in dettaglio sugli esperimenti fatti con me
Or—a vorrei richiamare l’attenzione soltanto su un
normali.
in
soggetti
la
dimetiltriptamina
con
fenomeno, che mi sembra assai interessante dal punto di vista clinico. Su 30 persone esaminate 22,
schema
dello
i
disturbi
1e
le
allucinazioni,
illusioni
e
semilateralizzati:
i1
sintomi
cioé 73% avevano
i segni di lesioni piramidali prevalevano a
anche
ed
atetosici
i
movimenti
dello
spaziO,
e
corporeo

�PSYCHOTIC EFFECTS OF DMT, T-9, MESCALINE, AND LSD-25

467

sinistra. Questa differenza era netta. Per esempio un soggetto sperimentale guardando la mano
sinistra diceva che essa non gli apparteneva pil‘l, aveva cambiato forma ed era divenuta luminosa e
bellissima; guardando invece la mano destra, diceva. che non presentava nulla di straordinario.
Abbiamo sperimentato su tre persone mancine, e in questa i fenorneni prevalevano alla parte
destra. Si dovrebbe concludere che 1a dimetiltriptamina produce una Iesione semilateralizzata
dell’emisfero non dominante del cervello.
Questo fenomeno ﬁnora. non segnalato dalla letteratura. per gli altri farmaci psicotropi ci
propone due questioni:
(1) La prima sarebbe la seguente: come si pub immaginare, che una sostanza chimica abbia
un effetto nocivo molto pi1‘1 forte sull'emisfero cerebrale non dominante? Sappiamo a1 contrario,
che é appunto l’emisfero dominante i1 ph‘l sensibile, specialmente se danneggiato nel sistema
vascolare.
(2) La. seconda domanda é di carattere psicopat'ologico. Si tratta cioé di sapere se questa
semilateralizzazione ci pub dire qualcosa sugli aspetti delle psicosi sperimentali. HOFF e PéTZL
hanno gia‘L/dimostrato collo “Zeitrafferphéinomen”, che lesioni organiche dell'emisfero non dominante possono produrre fenomeni psicopatologici molto strani. Lo “Zeitrafferphéinomen” é stato
descritto gié da BERINGER nel corso di psicosi sperimentali mescaliniche. Secondo 1a nostra. opi—
nione sarebbe di grande interesse studiare ancora. 1e psicosi sperimentali gié conosciute, a1 ﬁne di
evidenziare se ci sono diﬂerenze fra. 1e due parti del corpo. Ci pare probabile, che questo fenomeno
non sia un eﬂetto solo della dimetiltriptamina. Ad ogni modo, conoscendo i fatti suddetti, noi
possediamo ora una. nuova. sostanza per aiutarci a conoscere meglio i problemi dell’emisfero cerebrale non dominante.
‘

�Reprinted from
Psychotropic Drugs
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

283

Effects of psychomimetic drugs on cerebral synapses
The psychomimetic drugs allow us to elicit at will a limited, reversible, mental derangement in
man and a related distorted behavioral pattern in animals. They can therefore be highly potent
tools equally for the physiologist, the behaviorist, and the experimental psychiatrist. The tremendous versatility of the brain is nonetheless the manifestation of activity in a ﬁnite number of
structures and of mechanisms relating them. It follows, therefore, that the multiple patterns that
add up to biological behavior must share in part the available mechanisms. It is by virtue of this
probability, rather than because of any exact or fancied resemblance to the clinical conditions, that
the study of chemical or so-called model psychoses and the agents producing them can be expected
to be fruitful.
To the physiologist this suggests the need for identiﬁcation of the underlying unitary processes
involved; to the behaviorist, the identiﬁcation of the combinations constituting known behavior
patterns; and to the experimental psychiatrist, the comparison of natural and induced psychoses.
All can proﬁtably use drugs as tools for analysis. The clinician, furthermore, can convert these
ﬁndings into tools for diagnosis and the means for therapy.
The high vulnerability of synapses to chemical inﬂuences makes them a natural focus of
inquiry. We have utilized the synapses of the optic cortex of the cat (lightly anesthetized with
sodium pentobarbital) activated by transcallosal impulses initiated in one cortex and evoking
post-synaptic impulses recorded at the symmetrical point in the opposite cortex. This has proved a
very convenient preparation and the data are representative of a variety of cerebral synapses,
including cortical, subcortical and medullary synapsesl. By intracarotid injection we achieve an
active concentration of the drug or chemical in the ipsilateral hemisphere with sufﬁcient dilution on
entry into the systemic blood stream to obviate peripheral effects. The ipsilateral recording elec—
trode simultaneously monitors the input and output of the terminal synapses in the system, which
is submaximally activated every two seconds.
In this way we have established that synaptic transmission is under the control of a delicate
chemical equilibrium between cholinergic excitation reciprocating with adrenergic inhibition. It is
then evident that a disturbance of this equilibrium would lead to abnormal synaptic transmission,
resulting in disturbed cerebral and mental function.
Among the synaptic inhibitors naturally found in the mammalian brain are adrenaline, nor—
adrenaline, and serotonin. The last is by far the most powerfu13. Substances with a chemical
similarity to these become candidates for the role of psychomimetic drugs. Such is indeed the case
with mescaline, adrenochrome, adrenolutin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD-2 5) and bufotenine.
Mescaline is closely related chemically to adrenaline, which on oxidation is converted initially to
the indole, adrenochrome. Adrenolutin is a minor modiﬁcation of adrenochrome. Serotonin and
dimethyl-serotonin, or bufotenine, are indoles, and LSD-2 5 can be regarded as built on an indole
nucleus. It strengthens the argument, therefore, that we ﬁnd all of these to be synaptic inhibitors3 4.
Furthermore, their ranking as synaptic inhibitors parallels the ranking as to psychomimetic
potency in man.
The agreement between data from the anesthetized cat and the human encouraged us to
believe and test that tranquilizers, reported to be clinically effective in partially offsetting mental
disturbance, would have a predictable action on synaptic inhibition by psychomimetic agents. If
the synaptic inhibition so produced were truly instrumental in bringing about psychotic behavior,
then the improvement of such behavior that is observed clinically might be due to antagonizing of
an endogenous chemical corresponding to the exogenous psychomimetic drugs.
This, indeed, turns out to be the case. The prophylactic administration of chlorpromazine,
promazine, reserpine, and azacyclonol, in doses having no effect per 33 on synaptic transmission,
prevents or reduces the synaptic inhibitory action of the psychomimetic drugsz.
Overdoses of tranquilizers clinically produce toxic phenomena, some of them taking the form
of depression, and even psychosis. Likewise, large doses of the tranquilizers produce a depression of
synaptic transmission indistinguishable from synaptic inhibition. Characteristically, the tranquilizers exercise their clinical effect without a corresponding degree of depression. This is reﬂected in
the ratio of depressant to prophylactic dose, or “synaptic safety margin”. This safety margin is nonexistent for phenobarbital, equals 2 for reserpine, IO for promazine and 20 for chlorpromazine and
DEPARTMENT OF
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCH'IIRY
‘

s

“

APR

wetHyTAL

30

40.59

�284

SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

azacyclonol. The above data suggest the hypothesis that synaptic inhibition is one of the mechanisms responsible for some forms of mental disturbance. A perversion of metabolism resulting
either in an excess of endogenous inhibitory substance or an excess susceptibility of the neurons
upon which it acts, would result in abnormal patterns of activity whose variety would be determin—
ed by varying thresholds and, in particular, by abnormal inhibition interrupting normal control,
and thereby releasing more primitive and less adaptive —perhaps subcortical—t—patterns of activity.
Such conceptions emphasize the role of naturally occurring inhibitory indoles in mammalian
brain. Of these, serotonin is highly active, dimethyl—serotonin or bufotenine is twice as active as
serotonin, while adrenaline and adrenolutin are relatively weak inhibitors. Psychotic manifestations
have been clearly described for all but serotonin, whose powerful peripheral disturbing actions
seriously obscure the picture when it is introduced by the usual routes. For this reason we are
testing the effects of intracarotid serotonin injections in man.
The importance of serotonin has caused us to extend our original observations of its cerebral
synaptic inhibitory action with experiments designed to record the action of “in situ serotonin”.
This is accomplished by the use of iproniazid, the inhibitor of monoamine oxidase (MAO), the
enzyme responsible for the destruction of serotonin. With intracarotid injections of iproniazid we
can reproduce the cortical action of serotonin and show that, at the height of the synaptic inhibi—
tion, the MAO titer on the inhibited side is, in fact, lower than on the control side; as would be
expected if iproniazid is exercising its action by inhibiting MAO and, consequently, accumulating
natural serotonin at the synapses.
Following the reasoning already outlined, we again assessed the pertinence of the data
to possible clinical signiﬁcance by testing the action of tranquilizers against serotonin. We ﬁnd
that the tranquilizers exercise a prophylactic or preventive action against the inhibitory effects of
serotonin in the same way that they antagonize psychomimetic drugs.
A comparison of the cerebral synaptic action of psychomimetic drugs with that of naturally
occurring cerebral synaptic inhibitors and their modiﬁcation by tranquilizers produces data consistent with the hypothesis that a disturbance of synaptic equilibrium—in this case, by a preponderance of inhibitory effectiveness—is a potential mechanism for some kinds of mental disturbance, and that therapeutic results could be anticipated by various means of preventing or annulling
this eﬂect. The opposite kind of disturbance or a preponderance of excitatory effectiveness seems
also plausible. The prevention or annulling of this deviation in synaptic equilibrium would require
different measures. The effectiveness of different tranquilizers and varying therapeutic measures
might be expected to become diagnostic criteria.
Veterans Administration Research Laboratories in Neuropsychiatry,
V. A. Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa. U SA.
1

2
3

4

A.
A.
A.
A.

AMEDEO S. MARRAZZI

S. MARRAZZI, Science, 118 (1953) 367.
S. MARRAZZI, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci, 66 (1957) 496.
S. MARRAZZI AND E. R. HART, Science, 12I (1955) 365.
S. MARRAZZI AND E. R. HART, ]. Nervous Mental Diseases, 122 (1955) 354.

APR

,7

3 ‘0"!!!

DEPARTMENT OF
EXPERIMENTAL PEVOH‘AIRY

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS, N. Y.

�a
hemical aspects of Psilocgpin
p39
0......” “-4
cum

-c£—¢h—-g-M-

by A;Hofmannj

Eagle

psychotropic act1ve principle of Psilocybe mexic!
Helm has been isolated in crystalline form. This fungus
6ne
is
of the so- called magic or s.a¢red Mexican mushrooms used since
orecolumbian times by the indians of Mexico- dur1ng religeous
ceremonies and also by soothsayers to acquire clairvoyence.
The

inawater, but practically unsoluble

organicmost
in

solvents._r
Analysis, Spectra and colour react10ns indicated that 1t 13 a

\\
tryptamine.
The spec1al structural features of psilocybin are dis~.
.

�to central autonomic stimulation, the study of Psilocybin on

1solated
variety of
organsshows Only
on peripheral structures
¢

littleactivity ofshe
‘

adrug

5

‘

��8 MARCH 1958

.
‘

PSYCHOSIS AND TREMDR DUE TO
'
\L
MECAMYLAMINE
.

_

M.

HARINGTON

M.B. Cantab., M.R.C.P.
SENIOR REGISTRAR AND MEDICAL TUTOR

PRISCILLA KINCAID—SMITH
M.B. W’srand, M.R.C.P., D.C.P.
REGISTRAR

DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE, POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL OF
LONDON

ganglion-blocking agent for treat—
ing hypertension was introduced two years ago (Freis
1955, Ford et a1. 1955), and since then it has been widely
used in clinical practice, its chief advantage being that it
is fully and regularly absorbed when given by mouth. It
produces the same side-effects, due to blockade of the
parasympathetic system, as do other ganglion-blocking
drugs, but in addition reports have been published in
America indicating that mecamylamine may also have a
toxic action on the central nervous system (Schneckloth
et al, 1956, Deming et al. 1957).
We describe here four patients in whom tremor and
mental disturbance, with confusion and hallucinations,
developed while they were receiving mecamylamine, and
we suggest that this may be a not uncommon complica—
tion of treatment with mecamylamine given in large dosage.
MECAMYLAMINE as a

\

Case-reports
Case l.—A man, aged 55, was ﬁrst seen in July, 1955, com—
plaining of headaches. He had two years’ history of high
blood-pressure and ﬁfteen years’ history of gout. Although

intelligent, he was unstable and did not follow any regular
occupation.
On examination his blood~pressure was 230/140 mm. Hg;
he had numerous retinal haemorrhages and exudates; his urine
contained a trace of albumin and could be concentrated to
1.020; and his blood-urea level was 30 mg. per 100 ml.
Treatment.—-—Benign essential hypertension having been
diagnosed, he was treated with subcutaneous pentolinium, to
which reserpine 0-1 mg. thrice daily was later added. This
regime reduced his blood—pressure, and his fundi considerably
improved.
Mecamylamine therapy—In July, 1956, mecamylamine was
substituted for the pentolinium, 20 mg. thrice daily being
necessary to keep the blood—pressure down to 140/80 mm. Hg,
with the patient in the erect position, for the greater part of the
day. This dosage, however, caused troublesome side-effects,
at ﬁrst principally constipation, but later difﬁculty in micturition associated with frequency.
DR . HOBSLEY

BaraEtlaésCZIS

499

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

REFERENCES
M. (1952) Rev. Sanid. Polie., Lima, 12, 198, cited by Ferris et al.
2

Bernstein, C., Klotz, S. D. (1952) Ann. Allergy, 10, 479.
Dameshek, W., Neber, J. (1950) Blood, 5, 129.
Dobson, A. M., Ikin, E. W7. (1946) 3'. Path. Bact. 58, 221.
Ferris, H. B., Alpert, S., Coakley, C. S. (1952) Amer. Praetit. 3, 177.
Frankel, D. B., Weidner, N. (1953) Ann. Allergy, 11, 204.
Hoffmann, C. R. (1957) Surgery, 41, 491.
Loew, E. R. (1950) Med. Clin. N. Amer. 34, 351.
Maunsell, K. (1944) Brit. med. _7. ii, 236.
Mollison, P. L. (1951) Blood Transfusion in Clinical .Medieine, p. 317.
Oxford.
F. M., Margolin, S., Jackson, D. (1953) 3‘. med. Soc. N. i. 50,
Offegkgantz,
3 .
Simon, S. W., Eckman, W. G., Jr. (1954) Ann. Allergy, 12, 182.
Stephen, C. R., Martin, R. C., Bourgeois—Gavardin, M. (1955) 7. Amer. med.

Ass. 158, 525.
Wilhelm, R. B., Nutting, H. M., Devlin, H. B., Jennings, E. R.,
0. A. (1955) ibi‘d. p.’ 529.
W’inter, C. C., Taplin, G. V. (1954) Ann. Allergy, 12, 717.
Wright, W. A. (1950) .Med. Times, N.Y. 78, 466.

Brines,

Readmission.—In February, 1957, retention of urine developed and the patient was readmitted to hospital. His bloodurea level was now 60 mg. per 100 ml., rising after ten days to
72 mg. per 100 ml., he had a urinary infection, which was
treated with tetracycline. Soon after admission his requirement
for mecamylamine fell: the dosage was reduced from 60 to
30 mg. daily, and his blood-pressure was maintained at 110/70
mm. Hg with the patient in the upright position.
Mental and nervous symptoms.——On Feb. 19, 1957, he had a
tremor of the hands. All hypotensive treatment was stopped,
but next day the .tremor had increased and he became mentally
confused. Two days later his condition had deteriorated
further: he had a coarse generalised shaking affecting his whole
body, present at rest, and accentuated on attempting any
voluntary movement. His speech was slurred and jerky.
There was a general increase in muscular tone and in the deep
reﬂexes; the plantar responses remained ﬂexor. He was completely disoriented in both space and time and had vivid
frightening hallucinations. His extreme restlessness and
picking at the bedclothes suggested alcoholic delirium tremens.
From time to time he had lucid intervals during which he had
considerable insight into his condition. Repeated large oral
doses (10-15 m1.) of paraldehyde subdued the tremor and
relieved the hallucinatibns for three to four hours at a time.
This striking clinical picture persisted for a week and then
gradually subsided. By March, twelve days after the mecamylamine treatment had been stopped, the hallucinations had
disappeared and the patient’s mental state had returned to
normal. He could now remember in detail what had happened
during his delirium. Slight tremor persisted for a further two
days before ﬁnally clearing. During this period he had been
treated with subcutaneous pentolinium because his blood—
pressure had risen after the cessation of hypotensive therapy;
but it was difﬁcult to keep his blood-pressure down, because
he was conﬁned to bed. He was discharged from hospital on
March 14, 1957, taking two injections of pentolinium daily;
his blood-urea level had fallen to 38 mg. per 100 ml.
Readmission.——Four months later he was readmitted with
uraamia and left ventricular failure and died in ﬁve days.
Necropsy

There was atheroma of the blood-vessels at the base of the
brain, the gyri were ﬂattened, but no localised abnormality was
found on section of the brain. The kidneys showed lesions
of malignant nephrosclerosis.
Case 2.—A woman, aged 65, was admitted to hospital in
July, 1956, with left ventricular failure. She had eight weeks’
history of exertional dyspnoea. Her blood-pressure was
300/160 mm. Hg, and she had hmmorrhages and soft exudates
in her fundi. Her blood-urea level was 30 mg. per 100 ml.
She was treated with digitalis, mersalyl, and hypotensives—
at ﬁrst subcutaneous pentolinium and later oral mecamylamine.
When ﬁrst seen at Hammersmith Hospital in September, 1956,
she was very much improved symptomatically, but her bloodpressure was 200/130 mm. Hg, and the dosage of mecamyla—
mine was increased from 12-5 to 20 mg. twice daily. In
October the dosage was further increased to 45 mg. daily; but,
although this dosage did not control the hypertension, urinary
retention developed and she was admitted to hospital on
Oct. 29, 1956.
On admission she was cooperative and well oriented but somewhat apprehensive and overexcitable. Her blood-pressure was
290/140 mm. Hg, and soft exudates but no papilloedema were
noted in her fundi. There was no sign of heart-failure. Her
urine contained albumin, and her blood—urea level was 66 mg.
per 100 ml. Mecamylamine therapy was continued, the
dosage being slowly increased until on Nov. 6, 1956, she was
having 65 mg. daily. Her systolic blood-pressure remained
about 200 mm. Hg.
.Mental and nervous symptoms.—ln the early hours of NOV. 11,
1956, she became agitated and confused, having hallucinations
of voices and complaining of noises in the head. Her bloodpressure was 170/90 mm. Hg. She had general hyperreﬂexia.
K2

�M
500

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

During the succeeding days her confusion increased, and she
was disoriented for most of the time but had intervals of insight
and cooperation. Mecamylamine therapy was stopped on
Nov. 13. On Nov. 17 she was grossly confused and hallucinated, with paranoid delusions. She also had a coarse tremor of
arms and legs. Her blood-urea level had risen to 97 mg. per
100 m1. on Nov. 17 and to 140 mg. per 100 ml. on Nov. 20.
She became more agitated and violent and was completely
inaccessible. On Nov. 21 her condition made it necessary to
transfer her to a mental observation ward. She went progressively downhill, her blood-urea level rose to 296 mg. per
100 ml., and she died on Nov. 30, 1956, without any improvement in her mental state.

mid-poms. The kidneys were typical of malignant nephrosclerosis.

Case 4.—An electrician’s mate, aged 46, presented in January,
1956, with four months’ history of blurring of vision and

dyspnoea. His blood-pressure was 250/150 mm. Hg and he had
bilateral papilltedema with scattered retinal haemorrhages. His
urine contained albumin, granular casts, and occasional leuco—
cytes; his blood—urea level was 155 mg. per 100 ml. There
was no history to suggest previous renal disease. In view of
his visual symptoms hypotensive therapy was considered
advisable, in spite of the severe renal failure, and treatment
was started with subcutaneous pentolinium. At the end of
February his blood-urea level was 222 mg. per 100 m1.
Mecamylamine therapy—At this stage he was given oral
mecamylamine. He was not very sensitive to it, 60 mg. in
divided doses daily being needed to keep his blood—pressure
down to 160/100 mm. Hg. On April 14, 1956, six weeks after
mecamylamine therapy had been started, he was readmitted
to hospital with increasing trembling of his arms and legs for
the previous three days. On admission his blood—pressure was
160/90 mm. Hg. He still had bilateral papilloedema. He was
dyspnmic, and his jugular venous pressure was raised.
Mental and nervous symptoms.—He was drowsy and mentally!
confused. He had occasional spontaneous quivering of his
lips and a coarse irregular tremor of his limbs. His muscular
tone was increased; his lower limbs showed almost cogwheel

Necropsy

The left kidney was small (55 g.) with generalised ischazmic
atrophy suggesting occlusion of the renal artery. The right
kidney weighed 110 g., and its histology was that of ﬂorid
malignant nephrosclerosis. The brain showed a small area of
softening in the right internal capsule, and the cerebral arteries
were considerably affected by atheroma.

Case 3.—An electrical engineer, aged 53, was found in
January, 1956, to have a blood—pressure of 240/140 mm. Hg,
bilateral papilltedema, heavy albuminuria, and a blood—urea
level of 40 mg. per 100 ml. Malignant essential hypertension
was diagnosed, and he was treated with subcutaneous pentolinium and with rauwolﬁa alkaloids; but his“ blood—pressure
was difﬁcult to control, and during the next six months further
deterioration in the fundi and increasing cardiac enlargement

were noted.
On admission to Hammersmith Hospital in July, 1956, he
had heart-failure, blood—pressure 260/140 mm. Hg, bilateral
papilloedema, haemorrhages and exudates in his fundi, and
albuminuria. His blood-urea level was 139 mg. per 100 m1.
Treatment with subcutaneous pentolinium was continued,
a dosage of 30—40 mg. twice daily being necessary to control
his blood-pressure. Rauwolﬁa was not given. Chlorpromazine
50 mg. thrice daily was given because of vomiting. After a
month the heart-failure had cleared and the blood-urea level
fallen to 60 mg. per 100 ml.
Mecamylamine therapy—On Sept. 10, 1956, mecamylamine
therapy was started, and pentolinium was withdrawn gradually
during the next few days. The blood—pressure was not satisfactorily controlled during the period of transfer, but by Sept. 17
it was down to 140/80 mm. Hg, with the patient in the erect
position, for most of the day. This was achieved with a dosage
of 20 mg. mecamylamine thrice daily. By now the blood-urea
level had risen again to 100 mg. per 100 ml. The fundi still
showed papilloedema, but there were no fresh exudates or
haemorrhages.

Mental and nervous symptoms.—On Sept. 24, 1956, shaking
of the limbs and trunk was ﬁrst noted. This tremor also
affected the face and tongue; it was coarse and present at rest
but exaggerated on voluntary movement. The speech was
jerky and difﬁcult to understand. There was a general increase
in muscular tone; the tendon—reﬂexes were exaggerated, and
knee and ankle clonus could be elicited; the plantar responses
were ﬂexor. Mecamylamine was withheld after it had been
taken for fourteen days, and pentolinium therapy was restarted;
but the tremor increased, and four days later the patient
became drowsy and confused. He was now disoriented and
hallucinated, speaking to imaginary people and seeing snakes
and insects crawling across his bedclothes. His body shook so
violently as to rock the whole bed. Paraldehyde reduced the
tremor somewhat, but he remained confused and steadily
deteriorated. His blood-urea level rose to 170 mg. per 100 ml. ,
his urinary output fell, and he died, after repeated attacks of
left ventricular failure, on Oct. 7, 1956.
Necropsy

The brain was overweight (1490 g.) and oedematous, with
a small area of recent softening at the posterior end of the
putamen on each side and a recent small haemorrhage in the

THE LANCET

rigidity. His tendon-reﬂexes were uniformly increased, and
he had bilateral ankle clonus. His plantar responses were
ﬂexor. Hypotensive therapy was stopped, and he was treated
only with digoxin, but the confusion and tremor persisted,
and he died on April 16, 1956.

Necropsy

'

The kidneys showed the changes of malignant nephrosclerosis. The brain showed cerebral oedema, but no localised
lesion or other abnormality.

Discussion
The clinical picture was similar in each of these four
patients. In three the ﬁrst neurological abnormality to be
noted was a coarse tremor which affected the trunk and
head as well as the limbs and caused difﬁculty with speech.
It was variable in the early stages, perhaps hardly noticeable when a limb was at rest, but brought out when voluntary movement was attempted. The shaking of the trunk
made it look as if the patient was shivering. The tremor
was equally present on both sides of the body. At its
height it was so violent in two patients as to shake the
whole bed. Mental symptoms were observed before the
tremor in one patient, but in the others a few days after
the tremor. They consisted of a clouding of consciousness with confusion and disorientation, together, in three
cases, with hallucinations which were usually visual but
sometimes also of hearing or of touch. The mental state
ﬂuctuated, and there were lucid intervals, with some
insight, between periods of extreme delirium. Both tremor and mental symptoms were alleviated temporarily by
administration of paraldehyde, in case 1 strikingly so. In
this patient, who recovered from the episode, the mental
abnormalities disappeared ﬁrst, the tremor persisting for
a few days before ﬁnally clearing.
Examination of the nervous system in these patients
revealed a general increase in muscle tone, symmetrically
exaggerated tendon-reﬂexes with clonus, and ﬂexor
plantar responses. In no case were any lateralising signs
found. Electroencephalography in three cases gave
records which were difﬁcult to interpret because of arte—
fact due to muscle tremor; there was complete absence of
alpha rhythm, but in no case was positive evidence found

�8 MARCH 1958

501

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

either of a general metabolic disturbance or of a localised

lesion.

The patients all had severe hypertension. In two this
was frankly malignant, with papillaedema; in the other
two the presence of active retinitis and progressive renal
failure indicated that the hypertension was in a premal—
ignant phase, and at necropsy lesions of malignant nephro—
sclerosis were found in the kidneys. Renal function was
impaired in all. In three there was gross renal failure
with a raised blood-urea level which continued to rise until
death in case 1, who already had some renal impairment,
shown by a failure of concentrating power, but who had
a normal blood-urea level, there was a further deterioration in renal function and a temporary rise in the bloodurea level coincident with a urinary infection. This
patient’s blood-urea level had returned to normal by the
time that his neurological symptoms had cleared, but it
rose again later, and uraemia was present at his death four
months afterwards.
All four patients were receiving large dosages of meca5

mylamine (60—65 mg. daily) because smaller amounts had

not reduced the blood—pressure. The duration of admin—
istration of mecamylamine before neurological symptoms
developed varied from seven months in case 1 to fourteen
days in case 3. Case 1 had the least impairment of renal
function.
Since cerebral arterial disease is common in hypertensive patients, the question arises whether organic brain
damage due to haemorrhage or to infarction could have
caused the symptoms observed. Evidence of local cerebral lesions was found at necropsy in two cases: in the
right internal capsule in one case; and in both basal
ganglia and the pons in the other. The whole clinical
picture, however, was more like a toxic confusional
reaction, bearing in its fully developed state a striking
resemblance to alcoholic delirium tremens. The symmetry of the tremor, the absence of any lateralising signs
in the central nervous system, and particularly the complete disappearance of symptoms in case 1 after mecamylamine had been withheld suggest strongly that this drug
was to blame. In the patients who did not recover,
uraemia and death supervened probably before sufﬁcient
time had elapsed to allow the mecamylamine to be
cleared from the body.
Mecamylamine is a secondary amine and freely diffusible across cell membranes. There is evidence that
this drug is concentrated within the cell (Milne et al.
1957). It is therefore likely that its mode of action differs
from that of ganglion-blocking agents such as hexamethonium and pentolinium, which are quaternary ammonium compounds and are distributed only in the extracellu—
lar ﬂuid. That mecamylamine has a different, and previously unrecognised, mode of action at the neuromuscular
junction has been shown by Bennett et al. (1957). From
this it might also be expected that mecamylamine, apart
from producing the same side—effects due to parasympathetic blockade as other ganglion—blocking drugs,
might also have toxic actions from which methon—
ium compounds are strikingly free. There is some experimental evidence of a direct toxic action on the central
nervous system. Rats given mecamylamine in large
doses develop a tremor and have generalised convulsions
before death (Milne et al. 1957).
The frequency of this complication of treatment is not
certain. Doyle et al. (1956), Smirk and McQueen (1957)
and Kitchin et al. (1957), in their accounts of clinical

experience with mecamylamine, do not mention any
neurological symptoms related to its administration.
The four cases described here occurred among ninety
patients treated with mecamylamine at this hospital
(twenty of them with malignant hypertension). The
average daily dosage of mecamylamine in the whole
series, however, was only 35 mg. , and only sixteen patients
received more than 50 mg. daily. Moreover, this is a
selected group of patients, including some with severe
hypertension who were speciallyreferred.
In addition to the cases described in detail above,
three other patients treated with mecamylamine developed
a tremor without mental symptoms: a woman, aged 31,
with malignant hypertension and systemic lupus erythematosus and a woman, aged 51, with malignant hypertension and renal-vein thrombosis, both with moderate
impairment of renal function (blood-urea level 40—70 mg.
per 100 ml); and a man, aged 51, with malignant essen—
tial hypertension and urxmia (blood-urea level 114 mg.
per 100 ml.). The daily dosage of mecamylamine in these
patients was 25, 50, and 30 mg. respectively. In the two
women the tremor disappeared when the dosage of
mecamylamine was reduced and pentolinium was partly
or wholly substituted. It certainly seems that patients
with severely impaired renal function are much more
likely to develop symptoms of neurotoxicity while taking
mecamylamine: of ﬁve patients in whom the blood—urea
level was 100 mg. per 100 ml. or higher at the start of
treatment four developed tremor and three of these mental symptoms. This complication is presumably related
to the retention of mecamylamine in the body, its urinary
excretion being reduced in renal failure (Milne et al.
1957).

Summary
Four cases are described in which a syndrome of
tremor, mental confusion, and delirium developed under
treatment with mecamylamine. Tremor developed in
three other patients.
This complication of mecamylamine treatment
occurred in patients receiving large dosages thereof
(60—65 mg. daily); all these patients had or subsequently
developed malignant hypertension and in all renal func—
tion was impaired.
We thank Prof. J. McMichael and Dr. M. D. Milne for their
help and advice; and Dr. I. F. Goodwin for permission to report
a patient under his care.
REFERENCES

Bennett, G., Tyler, C., Zaimis, E. (1957) Lancet, ii, 218.
Deming, . B., Hodes,M . E., Edreira, J. G., Baltazar, A. (1957) New
Eng]. E.Med. 256, 739.
Doyle,A ,y,Murph E A. Neilson, G. H. (1956) Brit. med. ff. ii, 1209.
Mo yer,]. H. (1955)]. Lab. clm. Med. 46, 815
Ford, R. Dennis,E.,
Freis, E. D. (1955) Lancet, ii, 977.
Kitchin, A. Lowther, C. P. Turner, R. W D. (1957) 1'b1'd. p. 605.
Milne,M. D., Rowe, G. G., Somers,K., Muehrcke,R. C., Crawford,M. A.
(1957) Clin. SE1. 16, 599.
Schneckloth, R.E ,Corcoran, A. C. Dustan, H. P., Page, I.
3'. Amer. med. Ass. 162, 868.
Smirk, F. H., McQueen,E G. (1957) Brit. med. 3‘.1, 422.

H

(1956)

“ How then does a good physician help a patient to face
death and, accepting the ways of nature, to meet it? It is not
done by all the busy paraphernalia of scientiﬁc medicine,
keeping a vague shadow of life ﬂickering when all hope is
gone. . . . If man lives as a stranger in a lonely crowd, he dies
utterly alone. Whereas his entry into the world is the ﬁrst
stage of the dissolution of an intimate partnership with his
mother, his ﬁnal departure is the ultimate in solitary procedures.”——WILLIAM B. BEAN, Arch. intern. Med. 1958,
101, 201.

�W

502

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

ESSENTIAL FATTY ACIDS AND IDIOPATHIC
HYPERCALCIEMIA OF INFANCY
A. T. JAMES
J. WEBB
Ph.D. Lond.

and then after roller drying of this concentrated milk.
No loss of these two acids was found, although the same
experiment was repeated several times.
Table I also shows the linoleic-acid + linolenic-acid
contents of the same sample of milk after storage under
various conditions. After three months at room temperature
or at 37°C the “ essential ” fatty-acid content had fallen
to two-thirds of the original value 5 after six months’
storage under similar conditions the “ essential”
fatty acids had dropped to less than half their previous

B.Sc. Lond.

THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH, MILL HILL, LONDON

T.

STAPLETON

W. B.

MACDONALD

D.M. Oxon., M.R.C.P.

M.D. Melb., M.R.A.C.P.

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

LECTURER

PEDIATRIC UNIT, ST. MARY’S HOSPITAL MEDICAL SCHOOL, LONDON

ATTENTION has been‘drawn
deﬁciency Of “ essential ” fatty

to the possible role of a
acids (linoleic and arachi—
donic acids) in the genesis of idiopathic hypercalcaemia
Of infancy (Lancet 1957). It has been suggested (Sinclair
1956a) that in the preparation of evaporated milks there
is some loss of essential fatty acids and an even greater
loss in the production of National Dried Milk made by
passage over hot rollers; thus infants fed on dried milk
preparations might receive a diet deﬁcient in essential
fatty acids. This suggestion could have provided an
additional explanation of the frequency with' which
hypercalcaemia of infancy has been recognised in the
United Kingdom, where dried milks are widely used,
although one established factor to explain this frequency
has been the extent of fortiﬁcation of infant foods with
vitamin D (British Medical journal 1956).
We have studied the fatty-acid composition of samples
of human milk, cows’ milk before and after drying by a
variety of commercial techniques, stored dried milk, and
evaporated milk. Similar analytical studies of whole blood
from three healthy infants have been made, as well as
from three infants with idiopathic hypercalcaemia; the
latter were studied both before and after treatment with
cotton-seed oil (a rich source of linoleic acid). The fattyacid analyses were made with the gas-liquid Chromatogram (James and Martin 1956).

value.

Comparative Analyses of Various Milk Preparations used in
'
Infant Feeding
Table II shows comparisons of the fatty-acid composition (major components only) of two samples of human
milk, fresh cows’ milk, roller-dried milk, National Dried
Nlilk, and ‘ Carnation ’ evaporated cows’-milk.
The
difference in the levels of linoleic + linolenic acids in

TABLE I—LINOLEIC-ACID CONTENT OF cows’ MILK DURING PROCESSING
AND STORAGE (As PERCENTAGE OF ACIDS IN THE RANGE C3-C20)

Milk

Under the conditions used for the fatty-acid analyses the
gas chromatogram does not differentiate between the cis-cis,
cis-trans, and trans—trans forms of linoleic acid. In addition
linoleic and linolenic acids (the C18 di- and tri-unsaturated
acids) are not separated; so‘ the ﬁgures reported refer to the
sum of these two acids. However, the linolenic-acid content
of all the fats studied is likely to be low.
Studies in collaboration with other laboratories have shown
excellent agreement between the gas chromatographic and
spectrophotometric techniques for determining (1) a combined
value for linoleic and linolenic acids and (2) arachidonic acid.
The linoleic acid isolated from cows’ milk by the gas chromato—
gram has been shown to be 9 : lZ-octadecadienoic acid by the
micro degradation procedure described by James and Webb
(1957).

Results
Changes in Fat-composition of Milk on Processing to Dried
Milk and on Storage
In Table I are listed the linoleic-acid + linolenic-acid
contents of fresh milk, the same milk after concentration,

Powder Powder
stored stored Powder
3 mos. 6 mos. stored
at room at room 3 mos.
8 temp- temp- at 37°
erature erature

Fresh concen-.
milk trated After
before roller
120/
t ota(l drym dryin

_

solids

(21%

Kincaid)

so

Linoleic acid +
linolenic acid

3-2

s

1

3-0

3-4

2-3

1-4

2-4

Powder
stored
6 mos.
at 37°

1-1

human milk and cows’ milk was less than has sometimes
been supposed; but the effect of diet on these levels has
yet to be determined.
“ Essential Fatty-acid ” Levels in Blood of Infants with

Methods
Each sample Of milk was extracted exhaustively with ether-ethanol
overnight to remove the lipids. Samples of whole blood were
similarly extracted. The lipid extracts were saponiﬁed with methanolic potassium hydroxide, and the non-saponiﬁable material was
extracted with petroleum ether. The alkaline solution was acidiﬁed
with 5N sulphuric acid, and the fatty acids were extracted with
petroleum ether. The extract was dried over anhydrous sodium
sulphate, and the acids were converted to methyl esters by reﬂuxing
with anhydrous methanolic hydrochloric acid. Samples were stored
in high dilution in petroleum-ether solution at +2°C, and the
solvent was removed by evaporation before applying the sample to
the gas-liquid chromatogram.

THE LANCET

.

Hypercalcaemia
Case 1.—A male infant, born on Feb. 21, 1956, who had
well-established hypercalcaemia, was studied at the age of
9 months. He was fed cotton-seed oil containing 500/0 w/w
of linoleic acid for twenty days. During the ﬁrst ﬁve days he
received about 5 ml. of cotton-seed Oil a day; during the next
twelve days about 8 ml. a day; and during the last three days
about 20 ml. a day. The serum—calcium (table III and ﬁg. 1)
had been high for so long that it seemed improbable that the
fall from 15-8 mg. per 100 ml. to 9-9 mg. per 100 ml. in ten
days was due to a chance variation in its level, although such
variations are known to occur. Analyses were made of the fatty
acids of whole blood taken from this child before, while, and
after he was given cotton-seed Oil. NO signiﬁcant change
TABLE II—MAJOR COMPONENTS OF MILK FATS FROM VARIOUS SOURCES
EXPRESSED AS PERCENTAGE OF FATTY ACIDS IN RANGE C3-C20

Human milk
Sample
1, ten
days
after
start of
lactation

Acid

Myristic
. .
Branched C15. .

nC15

..
Palmitoleic

..

Palmitic
Branched
unsat. C17

nC17

. .

.

Linoleic
Oleic . .
. .
Isomers of oleig
acx

Stearic
. .
Poly-unsat. C20
(not arachidonic)

Cows’ milk

Sample
2, three
mos.
Fresh
after
start of
lactation

5-7
0-5
0-8
3-9
26-5
1-5

9-0
0-2
0-4
2-6
20-0

0-7
5-1
38-6

Trace
4-4
46-0

0-7
3-2
23-3

12-1
1-8

7-7

10-6
1-6
1-2
2-0
16-6
2-0

1-1

36

3-5
26-1
3-1

0-6
4-1
30-4
10-0

0-8
4-4
26-0
5-1

10-3

12-0

10-5
1-0

13-8
2-0

.

0-8
1-0
2-2
26-4
1-5

Not measured
Not
measured

National ‘
Cama—
OsterDried
’
milk
Milk
tion ’
roller- bought tinned
dried
from a
milk
clinic
10-7
1-3
1-3
2-2
29-7
1-5

.

0-

‘

Dill";

.

.

. i

. .

.

EXPERIMEI‘EIAI.

r.

.5

.....;-.‘a' {II

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

“24.53

GLEN OAKS, N. Y.

9-4
1-8
1-4

2-4
21-8
1-5

�Effects of Pitressin Hydration on the
Electroencephalogram
Paroxysmal Slow Activity in Nonepileptic Patients with Previous Drug Addiction

ABRAHAM WIKLER, M.D.
Surgeon (R), United States Public Health Service
LEXINGTON, KY.

0. s. MPMTWHT or

HEALTH,

tenement... MD

rustic mum:

sum!

ﬁEPRiN‘lED WITH PERMISSION FROM

“in"!!!

A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY ANi} P‘S‘IQHIATRY
VOL. 57-JAN. 194')"

HEV-J-L’EI" KV'.

�EFFECTS

PITRESSIN HYDRATION
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM

OF

ON

THE

Paroxysmal Slow Activity in Nonepileptic Patients with Previous Drug Addiction
ABRAHAM WIKLER, M.D.
Surgeon (R), United States Public Health Service
LEXINGTON, KY.

LTHOUGH hydration by forcing of ﬂuids and the use of pitressin

has long been employed to precipitate epileptic seizures for diagnostic purposes in persons suspected of having idiopathic epilepsy,1
no study has been made of the electroencephalographic changes produced by this procedure, either in normal or in epileptic subjects. 'A
single injection of pitressin has been reported to have no effect on the
electroencephalogram,” but no data have been found on the effects of
water intoxication except for the statement by Allen 3 that some experiments of this type on dogs had been attempted.
The present study was undertaken in an attempt to solve a clinical
problem. A patient at the United States Public Health Service Hospital was referred for electroencephalographic study because he exhibited
periodic episodes of antisocial behavior. A diagnosis of psychopathic
personality had been made, but it was desired to rule out epilepsy. A
routine electroencephalogram was essentially normal. A pitressin hydration test was then made with a view to provoking a ﬁt, antisocial
behavior or “epileptiform” changes in the electroencephalogram. Neither
a ﬁt nor antisocial behavior occurred during this procedure, but paroxysmal slow activity did appear in the electroencephalogram. This was
difﬁcult to interpret because of the lack of control data in the literature,
and therefore further investigations were made.
MATERIALS AND METHODS

The subjects for these experiments were 14 male patients at the United States
Public Health Service Hospital who were undergoing trearment for addiction
From the United States Public Health Service Hospital.
1. McQuarrie, I., and Peeler, D. B.: The Effects of Sustained Pituitary antidiuresis and Forced Water Drinking in Epileptic Children: A Diagnostic and
Etiologic Study, J. Clin. Investigation 10:915. 1931. Hilger, D. W.; Mueller,
A. R., and Freed, A. E.: The Pitressin Hydration Test in the Diagnosis of
Idiopathic Epilepsy, Mil. Surgeon 91:309, 1942.
2. Gibbs, F. A.; Gibbs, E. L., and Lennox, W. G.: Effect on the Electroencephalogram of Certain Drugs Which Inﬂuence Nervous .Xctivity, Arch. Int.
Med. 60:154 (July) 1937.
3. Allen, F. F.: Spontaneous and induced Epilegtifo: 1n Attacks in Dogs, in
"tr-rel iat. 102:67, 1945.
Relation to Fluid Balance and Kidney Function, f= m.
5

�to opiates while serving sentences for violation of the Harrison Narcotic Act and
who volunteered for this test. All these subjects had been in the institution six
months or more and had not used opiates habitually for at least that length of
time. Their ages varied from 32 to 46, with an average of 37.1. None gave a
history of epilepsy, and in no case had a seizure been recorded since the patient’s
admission to the institution. All were in good health. For 7 patients a diagnosis
of psychopathic personality was made on admission.
Electroencephalograms were made before and after pitressin hydration. Silversilver chloride cup electrodes were applied to the scalp, and bipolar recordings
were made from the frontal, precentral, parietal and occipital regions. The electroencephalograph was a four channel, capacity—coupled, ampliﬁer and oscillographic
apparatus with photographic recording on bromide paper. During the recording
the patient lay quietly on a comfortable bed in an electrically shielded, sound—
proofed, air-cooled room. An observer was always present to note movement
and to make sure the patient was not asleep. Records were taken before, during
and after hyperventilation.
Each record was analyzed as follows: A representative thirty second sample
was selected, and all waves over 5 microvolts in amplitude were measured and
counted. Paroxysmal activity was not included in the strip. The mean alpha
frequency was calculated by averaging all frequencies from 8 to 13 per second,
and the percentage of alpha activity was determined by calculating the time
occupied by such frequencies during a thirty second recording. A frequency spectrum was then plotted. The limits of individual variation from day to day were
determined on several records, and, with this method of analysis, the variation
in alpha frequency was found to be not more than 0.5 cycle per second, and that
in percentage of alpha activity, 12 per cent.
The method of hydration varied to a considerable extent because of differences in the ability of the. subjects to tolerate this procedure. In the ﬁrst few
experiments, pitressin was injected hypodermically every hour for seven hours
(in doses of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 cc.), and the patient drank 500 cc. of
water every hour for eleven hours. Some patients were able to tolerate this,
but others suffered from vomiting and abdominal cramps. The procedure was
then altered by giving smaller doses of pitressin hourly for eight hours (0.2, 0.3,
0.3, 0.3, 0.3, 0.3, 0.3, 0.3 cc.) and administering 1,000 cc. of 5 per cent dextrose
in distilled water intravenously every two hours until a total of 5,000 cc. had
been given during the eight hour test period. Some minor modiﬁcations
were
made in the dosage in individual cases.
The patients were admitted to the research ward in the morning, and preliminary physical examinations and records of pulse, temperature, blood pressure,
respiration and weight were made. An electroencephalogram was made in the
afternoon. Pitressin hydration was begun early the next morning, and the patient
was weighed at frequent intervals. Another electroencephalogram was; made the
same afternoon, after maximum ’hydration had been achieved. The patients
were closely observed, and records of blood pressure, pulse, respiration and
temperature were made every four hours during the period of hydration. A regular'
diet was prescribed, but coffee, tea and soup were excluded.
RESULTS

Clinical Observations—Some of the patients were fairly comfortable
during these procedures, but most of them had some degree of discomfort, chieﬂy nausea, abdominal cramps and occasional vomiting.

�Considerable puﬂiness of the face appeared in a few patients. In none
did alarming reactions of circulatory nature appear, and there were no
signiﬁcant changes in pulse rate 'or blood pressure. No epileptic seizures
of any kind were precipitated. It was found that the smaller doses
of pitressin (0.3 cc.) were just as effective in inhibiting diuresis as
larger amounts and produced less discomfort. On the morning fol—
lowing pitressin hydration voluminous diuresis took place, and the
patient’s weight returned rapidly to or slightly below the control level.
Electroencephalographic Observatiom.—The data are summarized
in the table. The average gain in weight at the end of hydration was
Eﬂects of Pitressin Hydration on

the;

Electroencephalogram

r—A—‘M—q

Total Per Cent Alpha Frequency

Alpha Percentage

Snb- Pitres- Gain in
ject sin.
Body
Differ
No. Cc. Weight Before After ence Before After

Difference

1

3.4

5.3

9.9

10.1

+0.2

71.0

73.7

+

2

3.4
3.2
3.2

5.0
4.5
2.7

10.2
11.1
10.7

9.8
10.6

—0.4

10.5

——0.2

83.5
47.3
42.3

82.1
40.0
63.3

— 1.4
— 7.3

2.6
5.1

11.5
11.6

10.9
11.4

~0.6

42.7
57.4

42.2
67.8

— 0.5

3
4

5
6

3.0
3.0

4

—-0.5

—0.2

8

3.2
2.6

1.8
3.2

9.9
10.3

10.0
10.0

+0.1

—-0.3

87.1
76.2

90.8
67.7

9

2.5

7.3

10.3

9.7

—0.6

74.3

58.9

10

1.3

4.3

11.5

11.5

0.0

22.6

22.9

11

1.3

5.3

11.1

10.5

—0.6

42.9

63.9

12

1.3

4.4

10.9

10.7

—o.2

63.3

41.2

13
14

1.7
1.0

5.3
3.9

10.4
11.1

10.4
10.6

0.0

67.0
60.8

61.2
46.9

7

——0.5

2.7

Comment

Shift to slow side and paroxysmal delta activity after
hydration

721.0 Shift to slow side after

hydration

+10.4 Shift

to slow

side and parox~

ysmal delta activity after

+

3.7
— 8.5

hydration

"

Shift to slow lid-e after
hydration
—15.4 Shift to slow side and paroxysmal delta activity after
hydration
+ 0.3 Paroxysmal delta activity
after hydration
+21.0 Shift to slow side and paroxysmal delta activity after
hydration
-—-92.1 Paroxysmal delta activity
after hydration

5.8
—13.9
—-

Shift to slow side and paroxysmal delta activity after
hydration

’_—“__——-—-———————
3
4.1

or
per cent of body weight. In 3 of the subjects the mean
alpha frequency was lowered 0.6 cycle per second, but in the remainder
the changes in alpha frequency, although mostly in the direction of
slowing, were within the range of daily variation. In half the patients
the frequency spectrum showed a deﬁnite shift toward the slow side
(ﬁg. 1). In the remainder no deﬁnite shift could be observed. In no
case was there an unequivocal shift toward the fast side of the spectrum.
The most striking change, however, was the appearance of bursts of
slow activity (6 cycles per second) of moderately high amplitude in
7 of the 14 records after hydration (ﬁg. 2). All but 1 of the control
recoyds were essentially normal and contained no paroxysmal slow
activity, either before or after hyperventilation. In the one record
Kg.,.

�a scant amount; of paroxysmal 6 per second rhythm was
present, and

this activity was greatly increased after hydration. In those records
which showed paroxysmal :3 per second rhythms, such activity appeared
in short bursts of 8 to 15 waves two to six times during the entire
run,
which was usually about three or four minutes. The incidence of
paroxysmal slow activity was not entirely the same as that of shift in the
frequency spectrum to the slow side. In 2 records there was a shift
but no paroxysmal slow activity. and in 2 the latter was
present but
there was no shift in the spectrum. There was no correlation between
the incidence of paroxysmal slow activity and the degree of hydration
or the total amount of pitressin injected. Nor was there a correlation
between the admission diagnosis of psychopathic personality and shift
in frequency spectrum or incidence of slow activity. Such changes
in the electroencephalogram after pitressin hydration were
present in
50 per cent of patients with diagnoses of psychopathic
personality and
in 50 per cent of the others. Consciousness was not grossly disturbed

5 6-7 89

IOII

l2!) l4 '5'l6 I?

2| M27 30
Fig. 1 (case 1).-——Eﬂ'ects of pitressin hydration on the frequency spectrum of
the electroencephalogram. The solid bars indicate values before, and the outline
bars values after, pitressin hydration. On the abscissa are plotted frequencies in
terms of cycles per second; on the Ordinate, the number of such frequencies in a
thirty second record. Note the shift to the slow side after hydration.
IS

during the electroencephalographic recording so far as could be determined by the observer in. the electroencephalographic chamber.
COMMENT

Although none of the patients gave a history or showed clinical
evidence of epilepsy, the electroencephalograms obtained on‘ half the
subjects after pitressin hydration could be termed “epileptoid” because
of the presence of paroxysmal slow activity. Furthermore, it is noted
that this change occurred in only half the subjects and was independent
of’the degree of hydration. This suggests that the appearance of “epileptoid” changes in the electroencephalogram depends on individual susceptibility. It should be emphasized here that the persons subjected to
this test were not truly representative of a “normal” group, since all

�had previously been drug addicts and recent studies at this institution
have shown that the great majority of the drug addicts fall into either
the psychopathic or the psychoneurotic group.‘
The ﬁndings provide a partial answer to the clinical problem which
gave rise to this study. It is evident that the appearance of paroxysmal slow activity in the electroencephalogram after pitressin hydration
cannot be considered indicative of epilepsy in the clinical sense of the

W.
wwmwww.WWwwmwwwwMaW
A

l

2
3

4

.

”NM.“.V“Mm”,rwyﬂ-MMMW‘MWﬁ«MV"V’AM'W‘W(VM/MVW‘v’w..”’V"'V’”‘tM/“ﬁ'“MP“v
.

WW WW",MM:A

2
3

A'

ﬂ

,1

,
35‘3“”

'W

”Ki—mﬁmmwmwwm
IVWWWWWM

mm

.

A

“A

I

.5.

1

v

n________r_______,____

vwmsxwlMMWWmswwm
.

4

.—

.

g.

.l

W.NWMNWJWW¢MW{MINWMMMWW

N‘MMWEMWMWMMMWWwmwwwvwﬂwawwWW
-

2
3

ii

“WW
MW
M;WWWMWIW{V\I‘JNWW
”Wm-WWW
h___________n_________n

B

I

'

‘JWMWN
MMWWi‘Wlw

5‘

WWW“V““M/“V’WMWMWWW-wWWW"
t

5-

H

2
3
4

“W

.
hW‘Wmm»

‘

,

n

n

,-

[-1

4 M'._M"‘wfw”.“f{‘wﬂgﬂ/ﬁfﬁAewMﬂWWNVI‘ﬁM'JWI/l {\VWK‘WAWMV

l

W“

W.’x{AMA}.A!W‘My/WWJfNUWWWW'WIl/V”NWAAfv’KVM/MM'y‘M‘fMﬁWV’V/‘N‘
F“

'

WVNVWMmtwAvW‘fPMdWWM
.

,

M

B

-

-

'1

2-.

a

a

I

r‘v‘wAMN/WwwwwwwwMMNMWx/vvwvvwv

.WW“.[it~ww’hwtwmwmmwniM”"¢"MWWWW‘MW
n

P

Wﬁ__u—rh———nn-_
of pitressin hydration
the

“W-

Fig. 2 (case 6_‘i.«—~-Effects
on
electroencephalograg:
(bipolar recording from the frontal (1), pretentral (2), parietal (3) and
occipital (4) leads; calibration 50 microvnlts; time in seconds). A and B
are control records made before and after hyperventilation, respectively; A' and 8’,
records obtained before and after hyperventilation after pitresszin hydration. Note
the paroxysmal 6 per second activity
gr hydration.
4. Aldrich, C. K., and Ruble, D.

Addicts, to be publishsd.

x."

:

Studizs

w“

the Pe sonalities of Drug

�term. However, it does suggest the possibility that the physiologic
mechanism which underlies the production of clinical seizures by this
method is also operant in certain susceptible nonepileptic persons and
that, essentially, quantitative threshold differences determine whether
or not, in any given case, clinical seizures will be precipitated. It
would be illuminating, in this connection, to compare the group observed
in this investigation with “normal” subjects and with persons known
to have epilepsy with special reference to the incidence of paroxysmal
slow activity. in the electroencephalogram after pitressin hydration.
However, such studies have not yet been made.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The electroencephalograms of 14 nonepileptic men with previous
drug addiction were studied before and after pitressin hydration. No
clinical seizures were induced by this procedure.
The alpha frequency showed a tendency to slowing after hydration,
but in only 3 instances was the degree of change greater than that
which could be expected from day to day variation. There was no
signiﬁcant change in the percentage of alpha activity.
In half the records there was shift to the slow side of the frequency
spectrum.
In half the records paroxysmal slow activity of moderately high
amplitude appeared after hydration.
There was some correlation between the appearance of paroxysmal
slow activity and the shift of the frequency spectrum to the slow side,
but no correlation with the degree of hydration or the amount of pitressin
'
administered.
The possible signiﬁcance of these observations in their relation to
idiopathic epilepsy is discussed.
United States Public Health Service Hospital.

�Reprinted from THE

JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Vol. 98, No. 4, April, 1950

EFFECTS OF METHADONE AND MORPHINE ON THE
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM OF THE DOG
ABRAHAM WIKLER

AND

SOL ALTSCHUL‘

U. S. Public Health Service Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky

Received for publication January 26, 1950

|

J-.
.4.

‘v...

The present study was made as part of a comprehensive investigation of the
comparative actions of methadone and morphine on the central nervous system
(1, 2). The dog has been utilized in these studies because the effects of small
doses of methadone and morphine on this species are analogous to those in man
(3—5). In particular, however, we wished to compare the effects of large doses
of methadone and morphine on the electroencephalogram since such studies cannot be made with safety in man. Some of the observations made in the course
of these investigations are also of interest with reference to the pharmaco—physiologic aspects of convulsive seizures.
Electroencephalographic studies were made on eleven dogs. In eight of these
animals the effects of methadone and morphine were observed without previous anaesthesia or curare. This was accomplished by the insertion of wire or “mercury cup” electrodes
which made contact with the dura over the desired cortical area. The mercury cup electrode (ﬁgure 1) was inserted under aseptic conditions and permitted the recording of electroencephalograms without muscle artifacts in the same dog as often as desired over a
period of several months. In one experiment a bipolar wire electrode insulated except for
the tip (interelectrode distance about 1.0 mm.) waslinserted into the left anterior lateral
hypothalamic area and ﬁxed in place by cementing its upper end to a metal cylinder which
was screwed into the calvarium along with other screw leads which served as cortical electrodes. In these eight dogs the electrodes were inserted under sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal) anaesthesia but experiments were not made until one or more days later after full
recovery from the anaesthetic. In the three remaining dogs screw electrodes were inserted
into the calvarium and in the midline plane of the sphenoid bone (Via the oropharynx to a
depth of 1.0 to 2.0 mm. below the ﬂoor of the sella turcica). This was done under ether
anaesthesia and the animal was then curarized (“Intocostrin” 1.5 cc. I.V. initially and 0.5
cc. I.V. at about 40-minute intervals thereafter) and artiﬁcial respiration was maintained
through a tracheal cannula. Experiments were not begun until the ether effects had worn
off as indicated by a return of the electroencephalogram to a normal pattern. In all dogs,
silver disc electrodes were also ﬁxed on the ears to serve as reference leads. In most experi—
ments, a 3-channel Grass resistance-capacity coupled inkwriting electroencephalograph
was used; in some, a four channel resistance-capacity coupled ampliﬁer-oscillograph was
used with photographic recording. Shielding of the animal was accomplished by a wire
screen grounded cage.
The motor patterns of convulsive seizures produced by large doses of methadone or
morphine were studied in six other dogs. After one or more seizures they were terminated
by intravenous injection of Nembutal. Moving picture records were made for subsequent
analysis of the convulsive patterns.
The dose range for methadone was 2.0 to 75.0 mgm./kgm. and that for morphine, 5.0 to
METHODS.

1

Now Resident Psychiatrist, Illinois Neuropsychiatric Institute, Chicago,
437

9

(as.

is

‘

it

111.

�438

ABRAHAM WIKLER AND

son

ALTSCHUL

initial doses were given subcutaneously while subsequent doses were given subcutaneously or intravenously.

350.0 mgm./kgm. In all experiments

The pre-medication resting electroencephalograms of the dogs varied considerably from dog to dog and on different days in the same dog (ﬁgure
2, control records). However, the changes produced by methadone or morphine
were quite different from spontaneous variations in electroencephalographic pattern. After small doses of methadone (2.0 mgm./kgm.) or morphine (5.0 to 10.0
mgm./kgm.) irregular high voltage random slow waves appeared in cortical tracings although fast activity present in the control records persisted (ﬁgure 2).
After larger doses of methadone (about 75.0 mgm./kgm.) or morphine (about
RESULTS.

LUGITE CUP

RUBBER DAM
MERCURY

,4 SILVER

m:
_%/

WIRE

\

mLT‘T"

\
,//ﬂ\\\\\\\m&amp;\‘

////

Hm

'

.

.

,l y }

2

-'

,,

,

J
‘

._

_—

SCALP

———MUSCLE
SKULL
DURA

—r---CORTEX

FIG. 1. Mercury cup electrode for recording E.E.G. from dura in unanesthetized and

uncurarized animals. Under Nembutal anesthesia, the scalp and muscles are incised and a
threaded trephine opening is made in the skull. The mercury cup is screwed in place and
the scalp sutured over it. After recovery from anesthesia and healing of scalp wound, recording of EEG. is made by inserting a sharp-pointed, ﬁne but rigid needle, insulated exis
The
latter
conthe
into
dam
rubber
and
the
mercury.
scalp
for
cap
the
through
tip,
cept
nected by the stout silver wire to the underlying dura. After completion of record, the
needle is removed. Mercury is rescaled in cup by rubber darn. Procedure may be repeated
indeﬁnitely over a period of several months.

200.0 mgm./kgm.) the earliest change (about one to three minutes after sub—
cutaneous injection) was the appearance of bursts of high voltage moderately
fast activity (ﬁgures 3B and 4B) in the cortical tracings. Later, high voltage
slow waves appeared in the cortical tracings (ﬁgures 30 and 4C). In several exof
of
bursts
high voltage
the
another
change
was
striking
appearance
periments
less
and
(ﬁgure
4D)
after
dome
morphine
mal”—like
and
spike
sequences
“petit
frequently and less typically after methadone (ﬁgure 3D). These complexes apassociated
not
but
both
were
from
hemispheres
in
cortical
or
one
tracings
peared
with any signiﬁcant change in tracings from sphenoid leads (ﬁgures 3D, 4D, and
4F). In some experiments bilaterally synchronous spike and dome activity in
the cortical tracings could be induced by sudden loud noises (clapping hands—ﬁgure 4D). Relatively early (twenty to thirty minutes) after methadone
seizure
discharges
spike
voltage
after
high
four
morphine
to
hours)
later
(two
or
appeared synchronously in the cortical tracings (ﬁgures 3E and 4G). In one of

.-.

f?
n

r

�438

ABRAHAM WIKLER AND SOL ALTSCHUL

In all experiments initial doses were given subcutaneously while subsequent doses were given subcutaneously or intravenously.

350.0 mgm./kgm.

The pre-medication resting electroencephalograms of the dogs varied considerably from dog to dog and on different days in the same dog (ﬁgure
2, control records). However, the changes produced by methadone or morphine
were quite diﬁerent from spontaneous variations in electroencephalographic pattern. After small doses of methadone (2.0 mgm./kgm.) or morphine (5.0 to 10.0
mgm./kgm.) irregular high voltage random slow waves appeared in cortical tracings although fast activity present in the control records persisted (ﬁgure 2).
After larger doses of methadone (about 75.0 mgm./kgm.) or morphine (about
RESULTS.

W
/// '

LUCITE CUP

RUBBER DAM

/

MERCURY

SILVER wnRE

\m+.—'

\
//ﬂ\\\\\\\\\\\‘
3W
,1
.
..,\//l
0/” V

x////

W,

,

..

5

‘.,-

'_'

23932,,

"ww/

,

..

y

i

.

'
“‘8-//////////%m,m

.

J

\N
1

1

2

_

SKULL
DURA

-————coarsx

FIG. 1. Mercury cup electrode for recording E.E.G. from dura in unanesthetized and

uncurarized animals. Under Nembutal anesthesia, the scalp and muscles are incised and a
threaded trephine opening is made in the skull. The mercury cup is screwed in place and
the scalp sutured over it. After recovery from anesthesia and healing of scalp wound, recording of EEG. is made by inserting a sharp-pointed, ﬁne but rigid needle, insulated exis
con—
The
latter
the
into
dam
rubber
and
the
mercury.
scalp
for
the
cap
through
tip,
cept
nected by the stout silver wire to the underlying dura. After completion of record, the
needle is removed. Mercury is rescaled in cup by rubber dam. Procedure may be repeated
indeﬁnitely over a period of several months.

200.0 mgm./kgm.) the earliest change (about one to three minutes after sub—
cutaneous injection) was the appearance of bursts of high voltage moderately
fast activity (ﬁgures 3B and 4B) in the cortical tracings. Later, high voltage
slow waves appeared in the cortical tracings (ﬁgures 30 and 4C). In several exof
of
bursts
high voltage
the
another
change
was
striking
appearance
periments
“petit mal”-like spike and dome sequences after morphine (ﬁgure 4D) and less
frequently and less typically after methadone (ﬁgure 3D). These complexes apassociated
not
but
both
were
from
hemispheres
cortical
in
or
one
tracings
peared
with any Signiﬁcant change in tracings from sphenoid leads (figures 3D, 4D, and
4F). In some experiments bilaterally synchronous spike and dome activity in
the cortical tracings could be induced by sudden loud noises (clapping hands—
methadone
after
minutes)
to
thirty
(twenty
early
Relatively
4D).
ﬁgure
seizure
discharges
spike
voltage
after
four
high
morphine
hours)
later
to
(two
or
appeared synchronously in the cortical tracings (ﬁgures 3E and 4G).-Irr gnepf

W-."
:
"em
4"

,

‘

.1]

—

*Since the publication of“ 95. paper we -nvo substitutged
fdi'ﬁi's
an
the
since
Wire
latter
for
*"z’rplatinum
Silva.
a Fer-i 0d of time and permits
amalgam with mercury a
mercury to leak throughw

rel

~.

_

‘

.4

,

.

‘

‘

‘5:
3.:

�439

METHADONE AND MORPHINE ON EEG

three experiments with sphenoid leads, such spike seizure discharges appeared
in the basal lead as well (ﬁgure 3E) and were followed by a steady 25 per second
rhythm in the latter while the cortical tracings were isoelectric or showed only

l
N~VAVE

K..~u,,V‘.~
-.

v

I".

fl ,'
.w.”w“: ‘w‘ﬂxﬁﬂl‘ﬁ,'\"

I}

c

V

——.—-—_—.~.

.’

1

\

.-*.*'
-

9'

N\W’WW§;""MJ a?
u

:~'

.I.

$15”

A

,5

'—-

_

FIG. 2. Dog #70. Mercury cup electrodes in left fronto-parietal and right parieto-occipital regions. No anesthesia or curare. All tracings bipolar transcortical. Time in seconds.
Gain same throughout. A—control. Note predominantly fast activity. B—two and onehalf hours after methadone 2.0 mgm./kgm. subcutaneously. Note general increase in voltage
and admixture of irregular slow waves. C—control, two days later. Note irregular rhythms,

varying from 10—30 per second (large “spikes” are probably EKG artifacts). D—two and
one-half hours after morphine 10 mgm./kgm. subcutaneously. Note changes similar to
those in B.

slow activity (ﬁgures 3G and 3H). In another experiment the spike seizure discharge from the cortex followed immediately after a typical spike and dome paroxysm (ﬁgure 3G). In the single experiment with hypothalamic bipolar leads,
typical spike and dome discharges after morphine 20.0 mgm./kgm. (subcutane-

�440

ABRAHAM WIKLER AND SOL ALTSCHUL

WWW
WWWW
WWW/«WAN
EFFECTS OF METHADON 75 MG/KG. ON E.E.G. OF DOG

”AI—um...

axe

SMMA’“

A

”“1

smVI

WWW
WWWMMW
WWW
.

..

l

\

FIG. 3. Dog #102. Curarized. Artificial respiration. Screw electrodes in left anterior-

parietal, right posterior-occipital and basi-sphenoid regions. In all records, upper tracing
is right occipital to right ear, middle tracing is left parietal to left ear and lower tracing is
sphenoid to left ear. Calibrations on “A” apply to all records except “F” where gain was
reduced as indicated. A—control. Note mixture of fast and slow frequencies of moderate
voltage in cortical tracings and periodic 4 per sec. waves of moderate voltage on a back‘
ground of low voltage fast activity in basal tracing. EKG is shown to point out slow activity
in basal tracing is of approximately the same frequency as heart rate. B—three minutes
after methadone 75 mgm./kgm. subcutaneously. Note bursts of high voltage spikes in
cortical tracings and little change in basal tracing. C—ﬁfteen minutes after methadone.
Note admixture of high voltage slow waves in cortical tracing; occasional random spike
in basal tracing. D—nineteen minutes after methadone. Note burst of 2 per sec. dome

ously) appeared in the cortical tracing from one hemisphere; later the
spike components increased progressively in voltage and the pattern assumed

�441

METHADONE AND MORPHINE ON EEG

EFFECTS OF METHADON 75 MG/KG. ON E.E.G. OF
(CONTINUED)

006

WMWMMWWWWh
MUM/MtllttﬂtttttttttttltWWW

MNWWWMMWMWWW

WWWMWWMWMWWWWWWWMWWW

WWWWWWWWWWWMIWW
[WV

wwwwmwwmwwtwwmwwwwmwm
I
“0}N

FIG. 3 (Continued)

and spike discharges from left- parietal region alone. E—twenty-two minutes after metha-I
done. Note very high voltage seizure discharges synchronous1n all tracings, consisting of
repetitive spikes of about 8 pe1 sec. frequency, gradually becoming faster. F—twenty-eight
minutes after methadone during a second seizure discharge, shown at 1educed gain. Frequency 15 per sec. G—end of seizure Note steady low voltage 25 per sec. terminal discharge
in basal tracing while cortical tracings are practically isoelectric at ﬁrst, then show only
irregular slow activity. H~thirty- seven minutes after methadone. EKG and basal tracings
showing cardiac slowing and abrupt end of another seizure discharge followed by steady
25 per sec. low voltage activity.

that of a sustained high voltage spike discharge. The tracings from the contra-

lateral cortex and from the hypothalamus showed no signiﬁcant changes during
this period. In all instances, after subsidence of the seizure discharges the cor-

�442

ABRAHAM WIKLER AND SOL ALTSCHUL

EFFECTS OF MORPHINE 238 MG/KG. ON EEG. OF

006

M'L’NMWNWNWWW

WWWWW
7

lhll

I

fl

wwMMJ‘tWJlsl .«qulllllll 'uln kW] \liiWW”"AMMWMAN'"MW,“AA
.

:

:4

ii

D

respiration. Screw leads in right parieto-occipital,
left fronto-parietal and basi-sphenoid regions. In all records, upper tracing is right parietois
lower
and
tracing
left
to
is
fronto—parietal
left
ear
middle
tracing
to
right
occipital
ear,
record
middle
Note
records.
all
on
gain
refer
“A”
to
Calibrations
left
on
to
ear.
sphenoid
is almost twice that on the others. A—control. Note mixture of moderately high voltage
slow and low voltage fast activity. B—one minute after morphine 200 mgm./kgm. subcutaneously. Note increase in moderately high voltage fast activity in cortical tracings; there
is little change in basal tracing. C—twenty-seven minutes after morphine. Note admixture
of high voltage slow waves in all tracings. D—one-half hour after total of 238 mgm./kgm.
FIG. 4. Dog

7%

93. Curarized. Artiﬁcial

tical tracings were isoelectric for a few seconds and then high voltage slow activity appeared. In most experiments this sequence of events was repeated
several times after the last injection of either methadone or morphine.
The motor patterns of the seizures were similar after either drug except that

�443

METHADONE AND MORPHINE ON EEG

EFFECTS OF MORPHINE 238 MG/KG. ON E.E.G. OF
(CONTINUED)

006

mll‘léllllijlW-“meww
WSMI

,

FIG. 4 (Continued)

of morphine (24 mgm./kgm. I.V. 3% hours, and 14 mgm./kgrn. I.V. 4 hours after ﬁrst dose).
Note burst of high voltage spike and dome complexes from right parieto—occipital region

alone; irregular high voltage slow activity in basal tracing. E—seven minutes after D.
Burst of spike and dome complexes from right parieto-occipital region with synchronous
activity in left fronto-parietal tracing, elicited by clapping hands loudly. F—eight minutes
after E. Similar synchronous cortical discharges occurring spontaneously. G—continued
from F. Note burst of spike and dome complexes from cortical leads followed immediately
by seizure discharge of very high voltage spikes. No change in basal tracing. H—end of
seizure. No change in basal tracing.

they appeared sooner after large doses of methadone (ten to thirty minutes)
than after large doses of morphine (two to four hours). Clonic movements were
more prominent in the seizures produced by methadone. The morphine seizures
were predominantly tonic.

�444

ABRAHAM WIKLER AND SOL ALTSCHUL

between the effects of methadone and morphine on
the electroencephalogram have been reported in the cat (6). In this species small
doses of methadone produced diphasic spikes with admixture of slow waves while
larger doses produced seizure—like sustained spike activity. Small doses of morphine caused an increase in frequency while larger doses produced slow waves
and subsequent disappearance of electrical activity. These differences appear to
be peculiar to the cat for in our experiments with dogs, small doses of
either drug produced admixtures of slow waves while larger doses produced seizure-like discharges. The bursts of moderately high voltage spike discharges seen
early after methadone or morphine were very similar to the changes produced
ab~
in
of
this
the
species
cortical
in
the
electroencephalogram
rat;
morphine
by
olition of cortical electrical activity seemed to be due to anoxia since
brain waves reappeared after tracheal insuﬂiation of oxygen (7). In man also,
the effects of single and repeated doses of methadone and morphine on the electroencephalogram are comparable (5, 8). Likewise in chronic spinal and
in chronic decorticated dogs single and repeated doses of methadone and mor—
phine produce similar effects (1, 2). However, in our present studies, some quantitative differences between the effects of these drugs were noted. Convulsions
appeared much sooner after subcutaneous injection of methadone than after
morphine. Also “petit mal”-like spike and dome activity in the electroencephalogram were much more prominent after large doses of morphine than
after methadone. Electrical seizure discharges from subcortical basal structures
of
the
in
of
in
but
dose
methadone
none
experiment
one
after
large
a
were seen
experiments with morphine. However, this difference may not be a consistent
one since a sphenoid lead was used in only three experiments. Nevertheless, some
differences in the actions of methadone and morphine may be expected since
these drugs appear to exert different actions on enzyme systems concerned in
brain metabolism (9).
Our observations are also of interest with reference to the origin of the electrical signs of convulsive activity, particularly the spike and dome pattern.
Hursch (10) found that section of the corpus callosum did not alter the pattern
of bilaterally synchronous “petit-mal” discharges in the cortex. Jasper and
Drooglever-Fortuyn (11) and Hunter and Jasper (12) were able to produce spike
and dome and sustained spike activity in both cortex and thalamus by electrical
stimulation of medial thalamic structures. These observations suggest a subcor—
tical origin of “petit-ma ” complexes. On the other hand, Hayne, Belinson and
Gibbs (13) as a result of studies in man, concluded that “. . . The present ﬁndings do not suggest a subcortical but a cortical origin for the three per second
wave and spike of petit mal, because (a) the spike registers on the cortex as neg—
ative when referred to a relatively inactive area, (b) it can appear as an isolated
and purely focal discharge in one cortical area and (0) no evidence was found
that it is causatively related to thalamic or other subcortical activity.”
Our ﬁndings are strikingly analogous to those of the latter group since
after large doses of morphine electrical seizure patterns could, and most often
did appear in cortical tracings without concomitant signiﬁcant changes in tracDISCUSSION. Differences

�METHADONE AND MORPHINE 0N EEG

445

ings from sphenoid or hypothalamic leads, and spike and dome discharges were
frequently observed in cortical tracings from one hemisphere only. However,
while suggestive, our evidence is not conclusive with regard to the origin
of spike and dome activity since in our experiments the two cortical electrodes
were not in strictly homologous areas and our basal electrodes (sphenoid lead
and bipolar hypothalamic leads) could not be relied on to pick up electrical activity in the dorsal thalamus. Our records also indicate that the spike and dome
discharge and sustained spike activity are closely related since in several
instances after large doses of morphine a spike and dome pattern was followed
by prolonged sustained spike activity without interruption. Except for the question of the thalamic origin of these seizure discharges, these observations are
analagous to those of Hunter and Jasper (12).
It is also of interest to note that when a seizure discharge was recorded from
the sphenoid lead, this was followed by a sustained low amplitude 25 per second
discharge apparently originating in subcortical basal structures. This resembled
strongly the “after seizure” discharge seen in chronic decorticated cats following
electroshock (14). In the latter study, morphine appeared to alter the electroshock seizure pattern so that fast and slow sequences resembling “petit mal”
discharges were seen in some records. In our present investigation, this 25 per
second discharge appeared in the sphenoid lead tracings while cortical activity
was absent or of a different character. Such independent activity of subcortical
structures and cerebral cortex has also been noted after ﬂuoroacetate (15).
SUMMARY

The effects of small and large doses of methadone and morphine on the
electroencephalogram were studied in unanesthetized and uncurarized dogs and
in curarized dogs. The motor pattern of the convulsive seizures induced by large
doses of these drugs was also observed in different dogs.
2. A “mercury cup” electrode is described which facilitates the repeated recording of electroencephalograms from the dura over the cerebral cortex in unanesthetized and uncurarized animals, without interference due to artifacts from
the scalp and temporal muscles.
3. Small doses of methadone or morphine produce an admixture of fast and
high voltage slow activity in cortical tracings. Large doses of either drug produce seizure discharges which may appear synchronously in cortical and basal
tracings or in cortical tracings alone. The seizure discharges from cortical tracings were both of the spike and dome and sustained spike patterns. At times
the former passed over into the latter Without interruption. An “after-seizure”
25 per second low voltage discharge in the tracings from the sphenoid lead was
not associated with activity in the cortical leads.
4. The motor pattern of seizures induced in dogs by large doses of methadone
or morphine were essentially the same, although clonic movements were more
prominent in the methadone convulsions. These seizures appeared much sooner
after subcutaneous injection of methadone than after morphine.
1.

�446

'

ABRAHAM WIKLER AND SOL ALTSCHUL

REFERENCES
99°F!"

S"

WIKLER, A.: Am. J. Psychiat., 105: 329, 1948.
WIKLER, A., AND FRANK, K.: THIS JOURNAL, 94: 382, 1948.
SCOTT, C. C., AND CHEN, K. K.: THIS JOURNAL, 87: 63, 1946.
SCOTT, C. C., CHEN, K. K., KOHLSTAEDT, K. G., ROBBINS, E. B., AND ISRAEL, F. W.:
THIS JOURNAL, 91: 147, 1947.
ISBELL, H., WIKLER, A., EISENMAN, A. J ., DAINGERFIELD, M. A., AND FRANK, K.:
Arch. Int. Med., 82: 362, 1948.
LEIMDORFER, A.: Arch. Internat. Pharmacodyn. et de Therap., 76: 153, 1948.
CAHEN, R. L., AND WIKLER, A.: Yale J. Biol. Med., 16: 239, 1944.
ANDREWS, H. L.: Psychosom. Med., 6: 143, 1943.
GREIG, M. E., AND HOWELL, R. 8.: Arch. Biochem., 19: 441, 1948.
HURSH, J. B.: Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 63: 272, 1945.
JASPER, H. H., AND DROOGLEVER-FORTUYN, J .: Res. Publ. Assn. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 26:
272, 1947.
HUNTER, M. B., AND JASPER, H. H.: J. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1: 305,
1949.
HAYNE, R. A., BELINSON, L., AND GIBBS, F. A.: J. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1: 437, 1949.
WIKLER, A., AND FRANK, K.: Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. and Med., 67: 464, 1948.
WARD, A. A.: J. Neurophysiol., 10: 105, 1947.
»

E‘PSDSDF'?’

Hg...

12.

~

13.
14.
15.

�EXPERIMENTAL SCHIZOPHRENIA—LIKE SYMPTOMS

MAX RINKEL, M. D., H. JACKSON DESHON, M. D., ROBERT W. HYDE, M. D.,
AND

HARRY C. SOLOMON, M. D.
Boston, Mass.

Reprinted from
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Vol. 108, No. 8, February, 1952

Printed in U. S. A.

�[Reprinted from THE

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY,

Vol. 108, No. 8, February, 1952]

EXPERIMENTAL SCHIZOPHRENIA—LIKE SYMPTOMS
MAX RINKEL, M. D., H. JACKSON DESHON, M.D., ROBERT W. HYDE, M.D.,
AND

HARRY C. SOLOMON, M. D.
Boston, Mass.

Printed in U. S. A.

�EXPERIMENTAL SCHIZOPHRENIA-LIKE SYMPTOMS

‘

MAX RINKEL, M. D., H. JACKSON DESHON, M.D., ROBERT W. HYDE, M. D.,
AND

HARRY C. SOLOMON, M. D.
Boston, Mass.

-

The nature and cause of the major psychoses are still unknown. Repeated attempts
have been made to reproduce experimentally
psychotic symptoms in the hope to uncover
their psycho—physiological relationship. In
1886, Schmiedeberg succeeded in producing
cataleptic phenomena in rabbits by the use
of ethyl-urethan. In 1904, Peters(II) discovered the cataleptic action of bulbocapnine; Baruk and de Jong(1, 9, Io) investi—
gated this, as well as many related chemicals,
more extensively and demonstrated the catatonic elfect upon man and animals. With the
discovery of new chemicals and chemical
compounds, new tools are made available to
the psychiatrist to investigate psychoses experimentally, and a new branch, experimental psychiatry, is emerging. The experimental
psychiatrist has the advantage of knowing
the one factor, in the causation of psychotic
symptoms, the chemical that was administered to the patient and started the chain of
reactions. The psychopathological genesis,
however, of the psychotic phenomena will
best be investigated by methods of the inter—
Read at the 107th annual meeting of The Ameri—
can Psychiatric Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, May
1

7-11, 1951.

From the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard
Medical School, and the Boston Psychopathic Hos—
pital; Dr. Harry C. Solomon, Director.
Aided by a grant from the McCurdy Company,
Rochester, New York.

H

C

/8
HC

\‘/

CH.

\C/
/\{twin/
\/ \/
C‘

CH

572

H

/ */\
C

_,
CH.

8

&gt;

CH.

\f”?
/\if”?!/
\/ \/

HC

N~CH;;

CH_

NH

\r/

HOOC

..

GET—CE
5

HC

Chemistry and Plu'zrmacology
L.S.D., which stands for the German Ly—
.vergsdure Didthylamid, is the abbreviation
used for the diethylamid tartrate of lysergic
acid which, according to A. Stoll, A. Hofmann, and F. Troxler(I7), is diastereomer
but not structurally isomeric with isolysergic
acid as seen in the accompanying formula.

coon

\*/

Hi

pretative analytical branch of psychiatry. Of
the chemicals used experimentally at present
2 are outstanding: mescaline, an alkaloid
known in its crude form as peyote for hundreds of years, though only in the past few
years chemically synthetized, and d—lysergic
acid diethylamide tartrate (L.S.D.), a member of the ergot group. Although these chem—
icals are quite different in their chemical
structure, in their effect upon normal subjects
and psychotic patients they show great simi—
larities with regard to the production of psychotic symptoms. The schizogenic effect of
mescaline has been reported in a number of
articles, most recently in a brilliant experimental and psychopathological publication by
Paul H. Hoch(8). Our paper is concerned
essentially with the description of the effect
of d-lysergic acid diethylamide tartrate
(L.S.D.) upon male and female individuals
who, subsequent to the administration of this
chemical, responded with the production of
psychotic-schizophrenic-like phenomena.

+—

C

Hi

HC

CH

C

CH

NH

N—CH.

CH.

�-

I952]

M. RINKEL, H.

J.

DESHON, R. W. HYDE AND H. C. SOLOMON

It is water soluble and administered orally.

Pharmacologically L.S.D. belongs in the
group of the ergonovine substances. It has
a deﬁnite“ effect upon the in situ uterus of the
rabbit, and causes peculiar states of motor
rigidity similar to the catatonic phenomena
in the dog and cat as' seen with bulbocapnine
(19). In our own experiments we noted an
especially strong physiological reaction in a
29-year-old very sensitive white girl who was
menstruating at the time. She complained of
most violent abdominal constrictions, which
may have been caused by vehement uterine
contractions. The peculiar psychological effect, seen as excitation in experimental ani—
mals, was ﬁrst observed and described by the
chemist, A. Hofmann. In his laboratory
notes of April 4, 1943, he remarked that,
while working with L.S.D., he noticed in
himself a peculiar restlessness associated
with slight dizziness. He had to interrupt
his work and went home to rest. While at
home, he felt as if intoxicated, a condition
characterized by an extremely stimulated
phantasy. After darkening his room, for the
daylight bothered him very much, he had a
most wonderful experience. Phantastic images of most extraordinary plasticity and intensive kaleidoscopic coloring passed before
him. This state of intoxication lasted about
2 hours.

Literature
Following this discovery a number of au—
thors investigated the effect of L.S.D. in
self-experiments, on normal subjects, and on
psychotics. W. A. Stoll(18), who ﬁrst systematically investigated the psychological phenomena of LSD, conﬁrmed Hofmann’s experiences and reported as the most striking
psychological ﬁndings disturbances in perception that led to hallucinations, acceleration
of thinking, slight dimming of consciousness,
but maintenance of judgment. He regarded
the psychotic condition as an acute exogenous
reaction type and pathologically as diencephalosis. Condreau(4) conﬁrmed most of
Stoll’s ﬁndings, but reported that in his experiments the subjects’ consciousness was not
disturbed aside from the feeling of intoxication. He added that the subjects maintained
their capacity of self-criticism, but showed
increased distractibility andiwere less able

573

to concentrate. The basic theme of thought
remained unchanged, and the changes in feeling tone he felt to be merely an intensiﬁca—
tion of the previous underlying mood. He
added as a new observation forced laughing
and one instance of athetoid movements as
suggestive of involvement of the diencepha—
lon, thus contributing to W. A. Stoll’s origi—
nal conception. A. M. Becker(2) essentially
conﬁrmed the observations of Stoll and Hofmann and emphasized the astounding production of psychosis—like syndromes following the administration of mere “traces” of a
chemical substance. He believes the psycho—
logical manifestations are the result of two
different basic disturbances: affectivity and
impulsivity on the one hand, and intention—
ality on the other. The most striking contrasts among his observations were manic—
hyperkinetic and inhibited depersonalized
manifestations. In contrast to Stoll, who
termed L.S.D. a “Phantasticum,” Becker
suggested the designation of “Psychoticum”
for L.S.D. Umberto de Giacomo(6, 7), of
Italy, in his experiments with rather large
amounts of LSD. (300 to 500 gamma) ob—
served in his patients catatonic-like phenomena, which were similar to those produced
by bulbocapnine. M. Rinkel(12) and Victor
H. Vogel(18) reported their experiences
with diethylamide of lysergic acid, adding
as new observations paranoic trends and, in
contrast to previous publications, slowing of
thinking and poverty of thought. Bush and
Johnson( 3) used L.S.D. as an aid in psy—
chotherapy, and reported that their psychotic
patients responded with an increase in activity and greater verbalization of psychopathology. They noted occasional short periods
of confusion and disorientation, and occasional transitory visual hallucinations. Most
of their patients showed some degree of eu-

phoria.

Method and Procedure
In our own experiments, L.S.D. was given
I 7 times to 15 normal adult volunteers, students, nurses, and doctors, in the 19—48 age
range, and, as freshly prepared solution, to
some psychotics: dementia praecox and
manic-depressive, depressive type. The observations on the psychotic patients are still
in progress and will be published later. The

�574

EXPERIMENTAL SCHIZOPHRENIA-LIKE SYMPTOMS

normal subjects, who were kept without
breakfast, received LSD. in doses ranging
from 20 to 90 gamma p. 0., in most cases
one gamma per kilogram body weight, while
the psychotics were given 3 gamma per kilogram body weight. This increased dosage for
psychotics was chosen on the basis of the
unanimous reports in the literature that psychotic patients were particularly resistant to
the effect of LSD. The subjects were kept
under continuous observation by at least one
of the authors for the ﬁrst 5 hours and, on
occasions, tape recordings of the subject’s
productions were made. The subjects remained under observation the same day at
the hospital, and were seen again the following day. The main emphasis in our observations was on the clinical psychiatric picture.
Routine neurological and circulatory system
examinations were not done, but signs occurring in these areas were noted, if observed. In 9 of the experiments, electroencephalograms at or near 2 hours after L.S.D.
were taken, and Rorschach tests were given
to 5 normal subjects and concrete-abstract
thinking tests to 2 subjects during the height
of the L.S.D. reaction. Controls of EEGS
and psychological tests were done while the
subjects were in their normal mental state.

Results
I. Disturbances of Thought and Speech.—
The most prominent psychological changes
observed were those in thinking and speech.
They were present in all our experiments.
There was no cloudiness of consciousness,
no intellectual weakness, but most frequently
we observed difﬁculty in the power of expression. The subjects became more and
more slowed down, poverty of thought became apparent, and the ﬂow of speech became increasingly diminished and blocked.
One subject, a middle-aged depressed pa—
tient, went into a complete stupor. In another
instance occurred unwillingness to speak, a
symptom similar to the negativism of the
schizophrenic. Hesitancy, indecision, and impairment of abstract thinking were frequently present; also looseness of thought
and actual disconnection with increased dis—
tractibility were common observations. As
in schizophrenic patients, some of the sub—

[Feb

jects exhibited such phenomena as lack of
spontaneity, irrelevance, pedantic imitation,
and subjectively automatic speech. In one instance, we had the impression of the formation of a neologism. Acceleration of thought
with ﬂight of ideas associated with rhyming
and punning; garrulity and loquacity of the
hypomanic type were seen in a cyclothymic
medical student within 45 minutes after the
administration of LSD. In general, the effects appeared within 30-45 minutes after
the oral administration of L.S.D., and disappeared gradually after 3-4 hours.
II. Affect and M ood.—-Clear-cut blunting
of affect and suspiciousness, as often seen
in schizophrenic patients, were outstanding.
These symptoms frequently led to feelings
of indifference and unreality with disturb—
ances in body image. The subjects experienced hostility and resentment, and on rare
occasions ambivalence. The phenomena occurred about 15' minutes after the administration of LSD; feelings of indifference
and blunting tended to be protracted; suspiciousness, hostility, and resentment were
always more transient. Changes in mood
were twofold: euphoria and depression,
which occurred in about equal number. Euphoria was either of the shallow elation type
with silliness, as seen in the hebephrenic, or,
in a cyclothymic subject, of the jovial and
infectious type, as found in hypomanic and
manic states. Depression was combined with
dependency, indecision, insecurity, passivity,
and feelings of being “lost.” In no instance
did we observe the happy and dreamy feeling
of ecstasy as it has been described by other
authors who experimented with L.S.D., mescaline, and other similar chemicals.
III. Perceptiou.—Usually within 40 minutes after the intake of LSD. disturbances of perception were observed. Those of
visual perception were most common and
mainly of the illusional type. The subjects
would see rippling or wavy lines on the wall
that might evolve into geometrical pattern,
or be associated with color such as yellow,
orange, or pink. In some instances, subjects
saw a thermostat on the wall as a cruciﬁx
but fully realized that the experience was an
illusion. None of the subjects, however, had
the feeling of seeing something of extraor—
dinary beauty, as it was stated in early re-

�I952]

M. RINKEL, H.

J.

DESHON, R. W. HYDE AND H. C. SOLOMON

ports on L.S.D., or as it may occur under
the inﬂuence of mescaline.
Gustatory disturbances occurred frequently; the subjects experiencing a metallic
or “funny” taste or heavy tongue.
Auditory perception was changed only in
a few instances. The subject would hear a
sound that was either near or distant, and in
one instance of a depressed patient, the noise
of a typewriter in an adjoining room was perceived as music, seemingly beautiful music.
The sense of time was disturbed in II out
of 17 experiments. It was characterized by
the feeling of time accelerated or retarded.
IV. Hallucinations and Delusions—Disturbances in perception, in a complex way,
often lead to hallucinations and delusions.
A vivid phantasy, a pseudohallucination or
illusion, in the process of mental dissociation,
may ultimately appear as a real object outside the subject and thus constitute a real
hallucination. By a similar process, changes
in auditory perception, combined with exist—
ing suspiciousness, may lead to ideas of reference and delusions of persecution. It may
be stated that hallucinations, predominant
under the inﬂuence of most phantastica, sub—
sequent to the injection of LSD. were
rather meager and never showed the quality
of an extraordinarily beautiful or threatening experience. The occasional visual hallucinations consisted mainly of formed images,
which occasionally were preceded by crude
ﬂashes of light. Perhaps the above—men—
tioned disturbances of taste perception should
be mentioned here as gustatory hallucina—
tions. In only one instance we noticed an
auditory hallucination, which consisted in
hearing bells, although there were none anywhere around. Haptic hallucinations were
experienced by two subjects. One male sub~
ject had the rather vivid feeling of his trousers being wet from urine, and one female
schizoid patient was convinced that she lost
urine and wet her slacks and the bed. She
actually, later on, did wet the bed, and it may
be possible that her hallucination was stimulated by autonomic excitation of the bladder
mechanism. Morbid ideas were common;
they included ideas of reference and ideas
of inﬂuence. One female volunteer became
quite paranoic and was Still disturbed the following day. Major delusions, ideas of gran—

575

deur or persecution, as seen in the delusional
states of the paranoic or paraphrenic, were
not observed. That may be due, perhaps, to
the fact that in our experiments on normal
volunteers we used only relatively small
amounts of L.S.D.
V. Depersonalization.—Alteration of personality occurred rather frequently. Those
changes consisted mainly in the subject’s feeling that his legs were either extraordinarily
long or heavy; in one psychotic patient the
feeling was that the leg between ankle and
hip had disappeared entirely. Most common
was the feeling of unreality as regard to the
subject, himself, and the outer world. Though
these phenomena were of minor magnitude,
they, too, indicate symptoms particularly ob—
served in the schizophrenic patient. In no
instance were we able to elicit experiences,
of synaesthesias, as frequently seen in mescaline intoxications.
VI. Behavior.—The most and striking
change consisted in underactivity, associated
with lack of spontaneity and initiative. One
schizoid-depressed patient went into a state
of catatonia; another one became stuporous.
A female schizophrenic patient, who had received 3 gamma/kg. body weight of L.S.D.,
became agitated; after an initial state of inertia, she suddenly stood up and went through
many and various motions. She knelt down,
kissing the wall, the ﬂoor, the examining
table, and progressively became more and
more excited. She tore off her clothes and
became noisy to such an extent that the ex—
periment had to be terminated by the intravenous injection of 0.5 g. of sodium amytal.
In our normal subjects, overactivity or in—
appropriate behavior was rarely noted, but
psychomotor manifestations, such as smiling,
giggling, and laughing, more often appropriate than inappropriate, were frequently observed. This was particularly so in a student
of cyclothymic personality make-up.
VII. Intellect—In our normal subjects,
intellectual functions were never disturbed.
The subjects were aware of what they were
doing at every moment of the experiment.
Their memory also never became disturbed;
each one was able to give, in a written report, a description of all the experiences he
went through. Also, the psychotic patients
did not show any particular memory defect.
.

�576

EXPERIMENTAL SCHIZOPHRENIA-LIKE SYMPTOM S

Patients Whose verbal expression became
slowed down and ﬁnally completely ceased,
as in the case of stupor or catatonia, were
able the following morning, under sodium
amytal or d—desoxy-ephedrine, to recall their
thoughts or personal experiences of the day
before under the inﬂuence of L.S.D.
VIII. Autonomic Nervous System.—All
normal subjects and also the psychotic patients had numerous subjective complaints
and symptoms. Since they mostly belong in
the group of disturbances of the autonomic
nervous system, they are best described here.
The most common symptom was change in
appetite, which more often was decreased,
and associated with nausea, than increased.
Complaints of headiness, giddiness, faintfre—
and
tremulousness,
shaking
were
ness,
The subjects complained
, quently expressed.
of chilliness and coolness of whole or part of
the body, lump and “funny” feelings in ab—
domen, constriction with oppression in chest
and precordial discomfort, violent cramps
and constriction in the abdomen in a pa—
tient who just happened to menstruate. Objectively observed were ﬂushing, sweating,
shivering, and shivering with goosepimples.
Tachypnoea, salivation, pallor, sighing, and
obscattered
micturation
of
were
urgency
servations. Changes in pulse rate and blood
pressure were of minor magnitude and observed only occasiOnally. Involuntary smiling, giggling, or laughing were considered in
the nature of “risus sardonicus” where the
subject described these phenomena as occurring Without or against his will. One subject
stated that in a smile he felt as if his facial
muscles were like plastic wax being moved
by some inexorable force. Pupils were often
maximally dilated.
Gross disturbances of the cerebrospinal
nervous system were not observed, except in
some instances “dysarthria,” which consisted
of a transient stumbling over words and was
never marked.
IX. Electroencephalogram.—EEGS were
taken in 9 experiments at about the height
of L.S.D. reaction, and compared with the
EEG of the same subject in his normal state.
In general, the EEG changes were only
slight. Principal changes occurred in the
alpha rhythm, which was characteristically
increased in rate from 1-3 cycles per second.

[Feb.

In one case, an individual who was very relaxed, a slowing of about 2 cycles per second
was observed. Hyperventilation showed a
diminished responsiveness and may be due
to the subject’s reduced cooperation.
X. Psychological Tests.
A. Rorschach—Controlled Rorschach tests
were given to 5' subjects at the height ofL.S.D. reaction. All tests given during
L.S.D. reaction showed abnormalities principally of the schizophrenic or paranoic
type. There was noticed autistic thinking
with decreased organization, contamination
responses, and lack of logical thinking, also
negativism and diminished emotional inhibition indicating anxiety, depression, and aggression. One Rorschach test revealed a
moderately schizophrenic picture with autistic thinking and withdrawal.
B. C oncrete-Abstract Thinking—The tests
consisted in employing proverbs and aphorisms and recording the subject’s reaction. On
the whole, the results, especially the wide
range of responses in abstraction and overgeneralized and tangential thinking, were
similar to those obtained in schizophrenic
patients.
DISCUSSION

The common denominator in all our experiments with L.S.D. on normal subjects is
a profound transformation and alteration of
the psychic state of the individual, as it is
a common factor in all psychotic states. The
various mental phenomena that we have reported were brought about by mere traces
(I:I,000,000g/kg. weight) of a chemical,
d—lysergic acid diethylamide tartrate. The
mental phenomena show similarities to symptoms that occur in actual psychoses. We
noticed, predominantly, changes similar to
those seen in schizophrenic patients. The
subjects exhibited preeminently difﬁculties
in thinking, which became retarded, blocked,
autistic, and disconnected. The affect was
shallow or there was clear-cut blunting.
Feelings of indifference and unreality with
suspiciousness, hostility, and resentment also
approximated schizophrenic phenomena.
Hallucinations and delusional disturbances
though present were much less prominent or
striking, but together with the manifestation

'

�‘

3952]

M. RINKEL, H.

J.

DESI-ION, R. W. HYDE AND H. C. SOLOMON

of depersonalization were most reminiscent
of schizophrenic dissociation.
To a much lesser degree were there similarities to the confusional states. Gross clouding of consciousness was absent in our experiments, but illusional misinterpretations
were not infrequently observed.
A few cases showed similarities to the
manic-depressive states, with changes in
mood of euphoria or depression. However,
only in one cyclothymic-pyknic subject the
intensity was of a hypomanic or manic state.
Delusions of grandiose or persecutory nature, familiar in the paranoic psychoses, were
not seen.
We mention the similarities of the experimental phenomena to actual psychotic
states in order to caution against fallacies
that may occur in the interpretation of experimental psychotic disturbances. The same
caution that is warranted in the application
of an animal experiment to a pathological
condition in man is needed in the application
of the psychiatric experiment to natural psychosis. Our experiments have brought to
light the fact that, in a short space of time,
under the inﬂuence of a mere trace of a
chemical agent in normal subjects, a variety
of mental symptoms occur that are similar
to natural psychoses, and that in psychotic
patients an accentuation of existing, or elicitation of latent, schizophrenic phenomena
takes place. It may be possible to assume that
fundamentally the mechanism of origin of
natural and experimental psychotic phenomena is a similar one: a chemical agent that
pathologically stimulates selectively various
higher, especially perceptive, brain centers
with the result of hallucinatory and delusional experiences. H. J. DeShon, M. Rinkel,
and H. C. Solomon( 5) have already pointed
out that the clinical effects of LSD. imply
such an involvement of the higher and highest
centers of the central nervous system, and
perhaps of lower levels of the nervous system

as well.

Many authors assume that chemical endogenous substances are the cause of schizophrenic psychosis. We must bear in mind
that, in addition to d—lysergic acid, a great
variety of seemingly unrelated chemical
substances are capable of producing transi-

577

tory psychotic-like symptoms. Although observations are still too few to allow the for—
mulation of a well-founded scientiﬁc theory
as to the chemical origination of psychotic
symptoms, we strongly believe that this
branch of experimental psychiatry is progressing in the right direction, and may
some day provide an answer to the most perplexing problems in psychiatry.
SUMMARY

The effects of minute amounts of dlysergic acid diethylamide tartrate (L.S.D.)
on normal subjects, with an age range of
19—48 years, and some psychotic patients of
the schizophrenic, depressive, and paranoic
type are reported.
2. Psychotic phenomena and alterations
of the autonomic nervous system were observed. The psychotic phenomena were pre—
dominantly schizophrenia-like symptoms that
were manifested in disturbances of thought
and speech; changes in affect and mood;
perception; production of hallucinations and
delusions; depersonalization and changes in
behavior. The basic intelligence was not
reduced.
3. Electroencephalographic examinations
at the height of the L.S.D. reaction revealed
only slight changes, principally increased
alpha rhythm, except in one case where there
occurred a slowing of about 2 cycles per
'
second.
4. Rorschach tests showed abnormalities
principally of the schizophrenic or paranoic
type. Concrete—abstract thinking tests also,
on the whole, showed responses similar to
those obtained in schizophrenic patients.
5. N 0 scientiﬁc theory for the origination
of the natural psychotic phenomena or psychoses is being advanced, but the belief is
expressed that experimental psychiatry progresses in the right direction.
1.

Credits

Our preparation of LSD. was supplied,

in ampules containing I mg. substance, by
courtesy of Professor E. Rothlin, Director
of the Pharmacological Laboratories of Sandoz Chemical Company, Inc., Basel, Switzerland.

�EXPERIMENTAL SCHIZOPHRENIA-LIKE SYMPTOMS

578

BIBLIOGRAPHY
I. Baruk, H. Psychiatric. Medicale, Physiologique et Experimental. Masson et Cie. Paris (VI),
1938.
2. Becker, A. M.

Zﬁr Psychopathologie der Lysergsaure-Diathylamid-wirkung (On the psychopathology of the effect of lysergic acid diethyla—
mide). Wien. Ztschr. Nervenh. 2:402, 1949.
3. Bush, Anthony K., and Johnson, Warren C.
L.S.D. 25 as an aid in psychotherapy. Dis. Nerv.
Syst. 11 : 241, Aug. 1950.
4. Condrau, Gion. Klinishche Erfahrungen an
Geisteskranken mit Lysergsaure-Diiithylamid (Clinical experiences in mental patients with lysergic
acid-diethylamide). Ejnar Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 24: 9, 1949.
5. DeShon, H. J., et 31. Mental changes experimentally produced by L.S.D. Unpublished article.
6. Giacomo de, U. Données biologiques sur l’ac—
tion psychopharmacologique de la diéthylamide de
l’acide lysergique (Biological data on the psycho—
pathological action of Lysergic acid diethylamide).
Paper read at the Symposium on “Chimie cerebrale”
of the International Congress of Psychiatry, Paris,
Sept. 18-27, 1950.
7. Giacomo de, U. La catatonia sperimentale.
Schizofrenie, 4: 195, 1934-1935.
8. Hoch, Paul H. Experimentally produced psy—
choses. Am. J. Psychiat., 107:607, Feb. 1951.
9. Jong de, H. Die experimentelle Katatonie als
vielfach vorkommende Reaktionsform des Zentralnervensystems (Experimental catatonia, as a frequent reaction type of the central nervous system).
Ztschr, ges, Neur. Psychiat., 139 : 468, 1932.
10. Jong dc, H., et Baruk, H. La catonie experimentale par la Bulbocapnine. Paris: Masson et
Cie, 1930.

Pharmacologische Untersuchungen iiber Corydalisalkaloide (Pharmacological in-

II. Peters, F.

[Feb.

vestigation of Corydalisalkaloids). Arch f. Experi—
ment, PathoLogie, 51:130, May 1904.
12. Rinkel, M.
(I) Discussional remark on
L.S.D.—Clinic of the American Psychiatric Asso—
ciation, held at the Annual Meeting of the A.P.A.
May 1, 1950, in Detroit. J. Clin. Experiment. Psy—
chopathol., Jan. 1951 (Van Ophuijsen Memorial

Issue).
(2) Discussion at symposium on “Chimie cere—
brale” of Ist World Congress of Psychiatry, Paris,
Sept. 18-27, 1950. Printed in “Les comptes-rendus

du Congrés.”
13. Schmiedeberg, O. Uber die pharmacologischen
Wirkungen und die therapeutische Anwendung einiger Carbamin Séiure-Ester. (On the pharmacological effect and therapeutic application of some of
the esters of the Carbamin acid). Arch. f. Experiment. Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 20: 203, 1886.
J. E. Psychopathologie der
14. Staehelin,
Zwischen-und Mittelhirnerkrankungen (Psychopathology of the diseases of the diencephalon).
Schweiz. Arch. Neurol. und Psychiat. 53 : 374, 1944.
15. Stoll, A. Les Alcaloidés de L’Ergot (The
alkaloids of ergot). Experientia 1:250, 1945.
I6. Stoll, A., and Hofmann, A. Partialsynthese
von Alkaloiden vom Typus des Ergobasins (Partial synthesis of alkaloids of the type of the ergo—
basins). Helv. Chim. Acta, 26:944, 1943.
17. Stoll, A., et a1. Ueber die Isomerie von Ly—
sergsaure und Isolysergsaure (On the isomery of
lysergic acid and isolysergic acid). Helv. Chim.
Acta, 32 (No. 2) : 506, 1949.
I8. Stoll, W. A. Lysergsaure-diithylamid, ein
Phantasticum aus der Mutter-korngruppe. (Lysergic acid diethylamide, a phantasticon of the ergot
group). Schweizer Arch. Neurol. und Psychiat.,
60: I, 1947.
19. Vogel, H. Victor. Discussional remark to
Hoch’s paper (ref. 8).

‘

��ILQMH
‘_

.1”.
'_

.,

z::y1;,;m.ynom

32/

[7

_

kHLLQJ-»
'2 2rd,
GLEN QAKS N. L

CLINICAL EFFECTS OF A “STIMULANT”
BARBITURATE
(Sodium I :3—dimethylbutyl ethyl barbiturate) in Schizophrenics

BY HARRY

[Reprinted from

H.

PENNES,

MD.

T8: JounNAL or Nnnvous AND MENTAL DISEASE, Vol.

119, No. 3, Mar. 1954]

�[Reprinted from THE JOURNAL

OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE,

Vol. 119, No. 3, Mar. 1954]

CLINICAL EFFECTS OF A “STIMULANT”
BARBITURATE
(Sodium 1:3-dimethylbutyl ethyl barbiturate) in Schizophrenics
HARRY H. PENNES,

M.D.‘x‘

central
the
nervous
than
rather
depress
stimulate
barbiturates
Many
of these drugs
evaluation
clinical
but
animals
in
experimental
system
barbitu—
of
central—depressant
Administration
a
limited
been
has
(15).
of
amelioration
transient
often
sodium
produces
such
amytal
as
rate
different symptoms' in schizophrenics (6, Io, 3). These symptom
changes are usually attended by a variable degree of hynotic (sleep—
producing) eﬂect which may proceed to actual sleep as the dosage
is increased. In the drug therapy of schizophrenics the excessive narcosis
produced by the central-depressant action of the barbiturates in common
administered.
be
which
conveniently
total
the
limits
dosage
may
usage
It was considered possible that a central—stimulant barbiturate might
of
the
desirable
ordinary depressant
the
activity
therapeutic
possess
barbiturates without the disadvantage of excessive narcosis.
The stimulant barbiturate utilized to test this hypothesis was 1,3—
dimethylbutyl ethyl barbiturate, sodium salt (15), (hereafter designated
as DMBEB) which is similar structurally to sodium amytal (14). A
small number of observations has also been included on another stimu—
lant barbiturate, namely, 3,3—dimethyl allyl ethyl barbiturate, sodium
salt, (supplied for research purposes by Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis) (16). According to reports, DMBEB produces a period of
increased alertness and restlessnes in unanesthetized dogs, followed by
convulsions; the seizures, which occur only in warm-blooded animals,
are Violently tonic in type and the locus is probably the spinal cord; no
hypnotic or anesthetic effects are noted in sublethal doses (13, 14,).
The reﬂex contraction of m. tibialis anticus is augmented in spinal and
barbital—anesthetized dogs; in this regard it is I/250th as active as
strychnine, one—fourth as active as picrotoxin, and more active than caf—
feine, cocaine, or ephedrine (9). The crossed—extension reﬂex in m. gas—
trocnemicus and respiration are also augmented (8). The convulsant
activity of DMBEB may be antagonized by administration of sodium
amytal (14). The sodium salt of 3,3—dimethyl allyl ethyl barbiturate
produces a restless, frightened, or boldly vicious animal in which con—
‘From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry (Paul H. Hoch, M.D.), New

York State Psychiatric Institute.

[25I]

�252

Harry H. Penna:

vulsions ﬁnally ensue; blood pressure and body temperature rise while
respiration is stimulated (I6).
Gottlieb has previously observed that DMBEB produces a euphoric
effect in depressed patients after oral administration in subconvulsant
doses (4). The drug was likewise maintained at a subconvulsant level
in the present study in order to rule out the possible therapeutic effect
of a generalized seizure.
PROCEDURE

schizo—
administered
hospitalized
20
to
Patient5.—DMBEB was
duraMean
mean
females.
8
males
and
was
32.5
12
years;
age
phrenics,
tion of illness, 13.4 years; mean duration of hospitalization, 2.2 years.
The diagnostic categories were as follows: pseudoneurotic, 6; catatonic,
The
pseudo—
unclassiﬁed
schizophrenic,
mixed
1
II.
;
or
hebephrenic,
2;
neurotics presented diffusely neurotic symptomatology in a basically
of
criteria
the
and
to
according
diagnosed
were
schizophrenic setting
schizo—
unclassiﬁed
and
mixed
of
The
Polatin
Hoch and
(7).
group
phrenics presented admixtures of catatonic, hebephrenic, and paranoid
cata—
Gross
disease.
of
the
features
the
well
as
primary
as
components
tonic stupors or excitements and diagnostic categories other than schizo—
phrenia were not included. Most of the patients were quite well pre—
served. Sixteen of the 20 cases had either no or slight deterioration
(6 pseudoneurotics, 2 catatonics, I hebephrenic, and 7 mixed or un—
classiﬁed schizophrenics); these patients were chieﬂy short-term, volun—
tary hospital admissions. The remaining 4 subjects displayed an
advanced degree of schizophrenic deterioration and were long—term,
state hospital patients. All but 2 patients had received at least one
course of electric convulsive and/ or insulin coma therapy at some time
during the course of the illness.
Dru gun—DMBEB was dry—sterilized in an electric oven at I50—I60° C.
for one to two hours. Immediately prior to intravenous injection the
drug was dissolved in 20.0 cc. of sterile distilled water at a concentration of 5.0 mg. per cc. A colorless solution was quickly formed. The
the
in
administered
20
of
that
dose
63.5
DMBEB
was
was
mg.
average
subjects. An injection rate of about 5.0 mg. per minute was used in all
subjects. The same procedure was followed in the administration of
3,3—dimethyl allyl ethyl barbiturate, sodium salt, to 2 patients both of
whom also received DMBEB on another occasion. Each patient also
independently received intravenous injection of sodium amytal (Amobarbital sodium, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis), 250-500 mg. dis—
solved in 10.0 cc. of sterile distilled water at a rate of about 50 mg.
per minute, as well as 20.0 or 40.0 mg. of pervitin hydrochloride (Smith,

�Eﬁect: of a "Stimulant” Barbiturate

253

Kline and French Company, Philadelphia) in 2.0—4.0 cc. of solution in
one minute. Six patients also received intravenous sodium amytal in the
same dosage and rate of administration as that of DMBEB. The drugs
were administered in random orders to the various subjects. Injections
were performed between 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. without limitation of
food or the subject’s usual ward activities. Changes in the patient’s baseline clinical status were recorded in protocol form for a period of at
least 48 hours following injection.
RESULTS

I. Mental Reactions.——DMBEB reduced clinical symptoms in II
(55.0 per cent) of the series. Three patients (15.0 per cent) showed only
increase of symptomatology and 6 (30.0 per cent) had no reactions
except for side-effects to be described in section II.
A. Symptom-reducing reﬂect—The therapeutic action was most pro—
nounced in the pseudoneurotic group. Four out of 6 patients in this
group experienced complete or almost complete relief of anxiety and
tension, phobic concerns, irritability and hostility, and depressive manifestations. All 3 obsessive—compulsive patients in this group experi—
enced amelioration of the disabling symptomatology, slight in I and
quite complete in 2. The usual duration of relief was two to eight hours,
but in 2 subjects the improvement lasted 16 to 24 hours. The symptomatic
improvement began during the injection, usually concurrently with
cephalic sensations described variously as “light—headed” or a “subtle
feeling of relaxation.” In the 14 overt schizophrenics (hebephrenics,
catatonic, mixed, and unclassiﬁed), 7 patients showed slight to mod—
erate therapeutic responses which were in general less complete than
those of the pseudoneurotics. The effects in the overt schoziphrenic
group consisted principally of signs of personality reintegration with
more normal emotional feeling and display, less self—concern and self—
preoccupation, an increased tendency to contact the environment, and
a somewhat higher verbal productivity. The most deteriorated cases
responded least to the drug in a therapeutic sense; these patients also
responded least to sodium amytal and pervitin.
These therapeutic responses to DMBEB were qualitatively identical
with those often produced by central—depressant barbiturates. How—
ever, the therapeutic response to DMBEB was more complete than to
sodium amytal administered in the same low dosage to 6 patients (30,
50, 65, 89, 100, and 100 mg.); this was particularly true in the pseudoneurotic group. Moreover, clinical signs of hypnosis with DMBEB
occurred in only 4 patients in the series and consisted of transient drowsi-

�254

Harry H. Pennes

excessive
slurred
speech,
and
nystagmus,
a sleepy expression;
ness
euphoria, and other signs of acute barbiturate intoxication were not
feel—
relieved
reported
no
subjects
present. Some of the most completely
after
such
of
signs
and
objective
of
drowsiness
displayed
no
ings
DMBEB. In addition, DMBEB produced none of the signs of psychic
“stimulation” that usually occurred after pervitin, a cephalotropic sym—
pathomimetic amine. Administration of pervitin was almost invariably
attended by a positive “stimulation” aspect consisting of increased alert—
ness and energy, feelings of optimism, and heightened psychomotor acaction
the
DMBEB,
to
therapeutically
In
responding
patients
tivity.
elimina—
neutralization
or
summarized
be
therefore
a
as
symptom
may
tion without concomitant “stimulation” and, as described above, with
occasionally a minor degree of sedation.
B. Symptom—increasing eﬂects.—Symptom intensiﬁcation occurred in
him—
for
felt
copiously,
follows:
sorry
one subject wept
3 patients as
self, and complained bitterly of mistreatment by doctors; a second

identi—
of
seizure
origin
hysterical
subject had a brief, opisthotonic
cal with the type occurring in the drug—free state; the third subject
felt more perplexed, confused, and depressed. These reactions were all
exacerbations of pre—existent manifestations which had also previously
increased spontaneously or in response to amytal and/or pervitin.
These excessive reactions appeared to be precipitated “psychologically”
as a secondary reaction to the unusual side effects produced by DMBEB
barbituof
showed
acute
of
these
signs
None
subjects
Section
11).
(see
resemble
did
the
reactions
entirely
not
In
subnarcosis.
addition,
rate
the exaggerated emotional discharges so often produced after pervitin,
since none of the primary “stimulation” effects of pervitin on psycho—
motor processes was present.

C. Absent mental reactions.—Six patients (30.0 per cent) had no reac—
tions to the drug in terms of pre—existent symptomatology. In 3 of these,
the side-reactions to the drug were so intense that the patients were
preoccupied with little else. In the 3 other subjects, there were no mental
side-effects.
considerable
of
absence
the
of
despite
signiﬁcance
changes

II. Side Reactions.—Practically all (18 out of 20) patients experi—
enced side—reactions. The toxic effects appeared during the injection and
the sequence of events was approximately the same in the majority of
subjects. Tingling sensations or other paresthesias began in any part of
the body, and rapidly became pruritic in nature; this was followed by
or associated with hot and cold sensations and a mottled erythema in
face, chest, and trunk. Pilomotor reactions often appeared on arms

�Eﬁect: of a "Stimulant” Barbiturate

255

and back; less frequently there were feelings of vague abdominal dis—
comfort or slight nausea; repeated, forceful sneezing; and occasionally
burning of the eyes. Cephalic sensations previously referred to (Section
IA) usually began early in the injection in a small minority of sub—
jects; on assuming the erect position some patients complained of a
vague vertigo of nonspeciﬁc nature and minimal degrees of ataxia
were observed.
The maximum dosage of DMBEB that could be comfortably tol—
erated by the subjects was limited by the pruritis, which was the most
frequent side-reaction (18 out of 20 patients). The itching usually
began in scalp, face, eyes, soles of feet, or genital areas. Spread was rapid
and in some cases the pruritis became generalized; some subjects rubbed
and scratched vigorously and became extremely distressed, tending to
disregard the other actions. All the side-reactions enumerated above
were of relatively short duration, usually subsiding in IO to 30 minutes. In some cases, the pruritis persisted for several hours, although
distress was always minimal after the ﬁrst 10 to 30 minutes.
In 17 cases, the injection was discontinued when the above reaction
deﬁnitely appeared, particularly the pruritis. The average dosage administered to these subjects was 64.4 mg. total or 1.01 mg. per Kg. of body
weight. The threshold dosage for the appearance of any effect, mental
or toxic, was in the neighborhood of 30.0 mg. The range of effective
therapeutic dosage without toxicity was therefore quite narrow. Two
patients received full dosage of 97.0 and 101.0 mg. total without side—
effects and a marked symptomatic improvement in one.
Two subjects displayed seizures at dosages of 59.0 mg. (0.65 mg. per
Kg.) and 68.0 mg. (1.04 mg. per Kg.), although other subjects receiv—
ing equal or larger dosages did not display seizures. The involuntary
movements were of a jerky, nonrhythmic myoclonic type; in one subject
the movements were more or less generalized and in the other limited to the right arm. The movements occurred in cycles of about 15-20
seconds duration for a period of about 10 minutes. Consciousness was
not impaired during the seizures; deep reflexes were normal in the inter—
seizure phases; there were no facial weakness, pupillary changes, nys—
tagmus, Hoffman or Babinski reﬂexes. The seizures appeared in these
two subjects after the itching had become severe and generalized. Continued experience with the drug showed that no patient developed a
seizure if the injection was discontinued at or shortly after the appear—
ance of the pruritis.
None of the side—effects of DMBEB occurred after sodium amytal
with the exception of its quite minor hypnotic action. Pervitin sideeffects were totally distinct, consisting usually of mouth and throat

�256

Harry H. Penna:

dryness, peripheral numbness and lightness, chest pressure, and cephalic

tightness or aching.
Sodium 1,3-Dimet/zyl Allyl Ethyl Barbituratc.—This stimulant bar—
biturate was administered in doses of 1.26 and 1.37 mg. per Kg. to
2 subjects. The same side-effects were produced as with DMBEB and
with the same apparent intensity. One subject experienced generalized
myoclonic—like twitchings. No therapeutic effect on mental symptoma—
tology was observed.
DISCUSSION

DMBEB has been classiﬁed as a “stimulant” barbiturate in animals
in the experimental pharmacologic literature because of its convulsion—
producing property and augmentation of spinal reﬂexes (13, I4, 8). The
epileptogenic action was conﬁrmed in this clinical assay of the drug
inasmuch as 2 subjects had seizures under the drug, the dosage being
maintained at the subconvulsant level in the other patients. The seizures
occurring in these 2 subjects were of myoclonic type, whereas Swanson
and Chen reported that the drug produced severe convulsions of tonic
convul—
of
difference
This
animals
to
as
in
(14).
type
laboratory
type
sion may be a species difference or reﬂect the limitation of dosage in
man. The median convulsant dosage after intravenous administration
to guinea pigs, rabbits, cats, dogs, and monkeys ranged from 2.0—3.0 mg.
with
brief
the
whereas
episodes
myoclonic
(14),
weight
body
Kg.
per
DMBEB in this series occurred with dosages of 0.65 and 1.04 mg.
per Kg.
The numerous side—reactions observed in man have not been reported
in animals; some of these side—reactions are purely subjective and there—
fore not observable in animals. Knoefel found that DMBEB produced
a stage of increased alertness and restlessness prior to the seizures (8);
dogs under sodium 1,3—dimethyl allyl ethyl barbiturate became restless
and also appeared frightened or boldly vicious prior to the onset of
convulsions (16). These apparent changes in emotion and behavior in
animals could have been secondary to a highly distressing action such
as occurred in man, mainly the severe paresthetic and pruritic response.
Either a peripheral or central locus of action might underlie the typical
constellation of tingling, burning or cold, pruritis, pilomotor contrac—
tions, erythema and sneezing. The sneezing in man may be analogous
to the respiratory augmentation observed in animals (16). Gottlieb
noted that the toxic reactions to DMBEB in man were not signiﬁcantly
affected by administration of antihistaminic drugs (4).
Despite the motor Stimulation caused by DMBEB in man and
reported in animals, there was little or no evidence that the drug acted

�Eﬁects of a “Stimulant" Barbiturate

257

in
stimulation”
The
“psychic
in
stimulant”
term
patients.
as a “psychic
behavioral
and
emotional
the
is
exaggerated
to
applied
generally
man
the
to
sodium
amytal,
or
with
intravenous
of
subnarcosis
as
phenomena
with
as
mood
of
psychomotor
processes,
or
“primary” heightening
of
these
of
Neither
amines.
types
the cephalotropic sympathomimetic
be
the
this
drug
In
may
DMBEB.
after
respect
reactions occurred
which
and
are
potent
metrazol
strychnine
such
with
as
grouped
agents
of
absence
The
stimulants.”
weak
“psychic
convulsants but relatively
be
in
DMBEB
with
man
stimulation”
may
of
obvious signs
“psychic
associated with the fact that the seizure locus in animals is apparently
the spinal cord (14).
have
been
no hypnotic or
has
to
reported
DMBEB
Although
observed
effect
weak
was
hypnotic
animals
effects
a
in
(14),
anesthetic
difference
This
series.
of
the
may
of
the
present
in the minority
patients
reﬂect species variation or technical limitations in animal experimenta—
tion inasmuch as a slight degree of narcosis is often purely subjective.
From the therapeutic point of view, DMBEB produced symptom
effects
the
of
the
series;
of
cent
20 or 55.0 per
amelioration in II out
ob—
Gottlieb
were most complete in pseudoneurotic schizophrenics.
60.0
i.e.,
material,
different
in
results
patient
the
tained almost
same
of
series
IO
in
administration
a
oral
after
per cent improvement,
schizo—
of
a
whom
as
diagnosed
was
only
one
severely depressed patients,
establish
advisable
deemed
therapeutic
been
to
has
It
not
(4).
phrenic
value on more than the present preliminary tentative basis because of
the high toxicity of the drug which would preclude therapeutic appli—
cation. The same conclusion was reached by Gottlieb (4).
The observed therapeutic activity of DMBEB cannot be explained
allevia—
because
action
weak
symptom
hypnotic—narcotic
in terms of its
tion (particularly in pseudoneurotic schizophrenics) occurred without
obvious
of
absence
and
the
fact
this
of
view
In
action.
such
appreciable
the
of
action
the
that
is
therapeutic
it
stimulation,”
apparent
“psychic
drug requires another explanation. Two hypothetical explanations are
the following:
and
stimulation”
properties
does
“psychic
DMBEB
really
possess
I.
in addition the hypnotic action of the ordinary barbiturates; the balance
between these two actions is such that a net weak hypnosis is occasionally
the resultant in man. In this case it would have to be assumed that the
complete
almost
the
theoretically
retained
is
despite
action
therapeutic
of
level
far
effects
in
stimulant
as
and
so
narcotic
of
cancelling-out
consciousness is concerned. In support of such a possibility is the clinical
observation that in simultaneous administration of amytal and benzedrine to mental patients, considerable therapeutic activity may ensue

�258

.

Harry H. Penna:

despite a fairly complete mutual neutralization of the narcotic and
stimulant actions of the two drugs (11). In this connection it may be
observed that Gottlieb interpreted the euphorizing action of DMBEB
in mental depression as a consequence of its “stimulant” properties and
from this concluded that amytal may exert its euphorizing action in the
same condition by a stimulant rather than a narcotic action (4). Gottlieb did not report any hypnotic action of DMBEB in his series such
as was observed in the present study; the difference may possibly be a
function of the oral route of administration in his study as compared
with the intravenous route in this report. His data could also be inter—
preted in terms of a narcotic rather than a stimulant action of DMBEB
and the beneﬁcial effect of amytal in depression still explained in
terms of a narcotic action rather than a stimulant one.
2. The second hypothetical mechanism for the therapeutic action
of DMBEB would be that the drug exerts this effect by a mechanism
other than central depression or stimulation. Direct evidence for this
interpretation is lacking. However, there are several sets of data which
suggest that the ordinary central-depressant barbiturates exert their
therapeutic action on mental symptomatology independently of their
hypnotic-narcotic actions. These data are the following: (a) a few
subjects display almost complete relief of symptomatology after intra—
venous injection of small amounts of sodium amytal before any or
much intoxication is apparent in the form of drowsiness, slurred speech,
or nystagmus. Conversely, a few subjects show little change in the
mental status even though the central-depressant action may be carried
to the point of sleep (10, 5). (b) The ﬁrst effect of the barbiturates on
the human electroencephalogram is the appearance of relatively rapid
(20-25 sec.), medium—high voltage activity, particularly in the frontal
leads (II, I, 12). The appearance of this activity coincides temporally
with reduction of anxiety and tension in some patients and the appearance of a more or less euphoric state (11, 12). The physiologic signiﬁcance of this rapid activity has not been fully determined as yet but in
any event it is distinct from the EEG charges which are usually accepted
as manifestations of depressed consciousness, i.e., high voltage, slow
activity (2).
In view of these considerations, it is possible that both DMBEB
and the ordinary barbiturates owe their therapeutic effect on mental
symptomatology to some hitherto undisclosed feature of their action.
The pharmacologic literature contains reference to a large number of
motor stimulant barbiturates which have never received clinical assay.
These compounds show no underlying uniformity of chemical structure
and many are in the thiobarbiturate series. The possibility exists that

�Eﬁ‘ects of a “Stimulant” Barbiturate

259

without
these
of
drugs
with
obtainable
some
therapeutic action may be
the excessive toxicity of DMBEB.
SUMMARY
bar—
ethyl
The “stimulant” barbiturate, sodium 1,3—dimethylbutyl
various
with
20
patients
biturate, was administered intravenously to
value.
of
its
therapeutic
forms of schizophrenia in a preliminary assay
effect
therapeutic
occurring
I. The drug exerted an irregularly
in
pseudoneurotic
degree
of
complete
which
most
was
(55.0 per cent)
further
establish
advisable
to
deemed
been
schizophrenics. It has not
which
toxicity
the
high
of
relatively
because
the therapeutic efficacy
would preclude therapeutic application.
in
convulsant
is
the
a
that
drug
literature
the
2. In accord with
remainthe
in
seizures;
had
series
myoclonic
this
animals, 2 patients in
level.
A
subconvulsant
maintained
a
at
ing subjects the dosage was
small minority of subjects showed weak signs of central nervous system
central—depressant
the
drowsiness;
of
form
the
slight
in
depression
action has not been reported in animals.
occurred
independently
the
of
usually
effect
drug
The
therapeutic
3.
evidence
was
No
action.
central—depressant
and
of its weak
infrequent
of
the
in
sense
stimulant”
acted
“psychic
as a
obtained that the drug
heightening of mood and psycho-motor processes.
action
the
of
therapeutic
mechanism
the
of
4. Several explanations
of the stimufurther
of
investigation
the
desirability
and
offered
were
lant barbiturate series indicated.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

the Cerebral CorBarbiturates
of
Action
on
E.:
and
I.
Finesinger,
A.
M.
B.,
(1) Brazier,
tex. Arch. Neural. 6r Frye/liar” 53: 51-58, 1945.
Brain.
the
of
Activity
Electrical
the
Underlying
Mechanisms
: Physiological
(2)
I. Neural, Neurosurg, 6* Psych, 11: 118-133, 1948.
Sodium Amytal
of
Intravenous
Value
M.:
Prognostic
and
I.
Hope,
S.,
(3) Gottlieb, I.
in Cases of Schizophrenia. Arc/z. Neural. 6' Prychiat., 46: 86-100, 1941.
Acid. Arch.
Barbituric
5-(1,3-Dirnethylbuty1)-5—Ethyl
of
Action
Antidepressive
(4)
Neurol. 6r P5yc/ziat., 66: 318—328, 1951.
and
Sodium
Amytal
of
Administration
of
Effect
S.
B:
(5) Harris, M. H., and Katz,
Sodium Rhodonate on Mental Patients. Am. I. P:yc/ziwt., 12: 1065-1083, 1933.
NERVOUS &amp;
JOURNAL
and
Therapy.
of
Narcodiagnosis
Status
Present
(6) Hoch, P. H.:
MENTAL DISEASE, 103: 248-259, 1946.
Psychiat.
of
Schizophrenia.
Form
Pseudoneurotic
P.:
Polatin,
and
(7) Hoch, P. H.,
Quart., 23: 248—276, 1949.
by
Nervous
Central
System
the
of
and
Depression
Stimulation
K.:
(8) Knoefel, P.
Therap.,
6'
Pharm.
Exper.
Acids.
I.
Thiobarbituric
and
Barbituric
of
Derivatives
84: 26-33. I945&lt;9 Exper. Therap., 57:
Pharm.
Barbiturate.
I.
Convulsant
of
Action
a
: The
(9)
130, 1936 (Proc.).
Sodium Amytal, Pervitin
to
of
Schizophrenics
Reactions
Clinical
H.:
H.
(10) Pennes,
'

—:

�260

(11)
(12)

(I3)
(I4)
(15)
(16)

Harry H. Penna:
Hydrochloride, Mescaline Sulfate and D-lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD25).
(To be published.)
: Personal Observation.
Rubin, M. A., Malamud, W., and Hope, 1.: EEG and Psychopathological Manirestations in Schizophrenia as Inﬂuenced by Drugs. Psychosom. Med., 4: 355-361,
1942.
Shonle, H. A., et 31.: Relation of the Structure of Dialkyl Barbituric Acids to the
Length of Their Action. I. Am. Chem. Soc., 58: 585—587, 1936.
Swanson, E. E., and Chen, K. K.: The Aberrant Action of Sodium I :3—dimethylbutyl
Ethyl Barbiturate. Quart. I. Pharm. é‘r Pharmacol., 12: 657-660, 1939.
Tatum, A. L.: Present Status of the Barbituratc Problem. Physiol. Rem, 19: 472502, 1939Taylor, N. B. G., and Noble, R. L.: Some Pharmacological Properties of Sodium
Ethyl, 3:3 Dimethylallyl Barbiturate. Nature, 163: 447, 1949.

��W
Ruth.

t

,
mm
mm.bail. Ion-r “I!“

i

mammcsmmcm

mmmnuﬂ.‘
iv

P.hmulJ.I.lIOou
,_

«2:!

"WWW“

'thﬁ-WMW-lmw
mun-nuns;
MM,”

mug-v.4

pawn

1...,”

.»,t

Proof. to: Dr.J.D.lcCou

it. nonu- Ltd.
but
lo: 959

“on“, “a

m

�gnu-gotta
or
ﬂu
«unnoand
at
up
nun-um
at»),
mum».

Ann; tho

mm,
(mm,
mauuorummwgpu'wubom
attache-amid.

”haul-Watt!”

muunuu,nwu,mumwwu1uu
vlllult. m,ud¢mlduquuonofﬁom¢nub
Mr
uticomamnleutboc-W

mummwu,muuaoomump
mm,1umovd1h-u(cmsuand,19533 Inn-r,
M1955,
mam,
1955. 1957;

1956;

-.‘-a.-1--

ran

195‘).

mmmuxtuwmtmsmtzu

“mummmwmumm
Min-lull. Itmmuthttumotm
«rutnammuummwwmd

Wan-«An

m

.u-..

Hum.»

a.‘

“.“.".‘m'

.-

‘

�4-1-1-

We

CN nice weighing between

1.8

and 20 gram were used;

all

0.2
of
:1.
value
a
m
in
intraparitoneany
inJected
were
8201'.
80
of
.experilenta were carried out at a root tcperatnre
The clonio convuleion (produced ”I nicotine, pentylenetet—
was taken ae tho end

point and the

resale, etrychnino or picrotoxinﬂ
obeerved
date.
the
frocalculated
van
613,. in tern of “Jim.
(LIICEI’IIID

I HMO!

The

1949).

Imaof
phenobarbital
duration
nor-a1
the
increase in

noeie (neaeured by the

ion

of rightinc reﬂex) produced by

the”

of
the
of
potutiation
intensity
couponnde we investigated.
eeriee
by
a
the
Iowa
in
ooapared
van
phenobarbital by these agents
the
dose
the
in
presence
obtained
by
varying
of doeo-ruponee aux-roe
The

(30
of
phenobarbital
don
constant
of a

Prolininary

”en-eats

were

I‘m/in.)
carried out to eetahlieh the

latentperiodof thepbonobarbitalandtoeneurothattbedoeoeot
15
The
iajooted
were
latter
the ataractioe need were euboonvnlaant.

atar—
neefnl
were
those
clinically
nopnoba-ato were teeted. Five of
of
etmtaral
their
became
selected
were
othere
while
aotice

(Table
I).
to
bemtynine
relationlhip
0

obtained
were
and
pierotoxin
Pentylenetetrasole

nicotine 95$

Laboratoriee;

ellfate fro.

1'.

l

H.

ﬁlth,

fro- laatnen
Ltd.

fret

in

Organic Chemical-g

Meat“
etryebnine

�w.

‘TSE'

rm-Nr‘mn

'.5w-7-

‘,-v

T:
.viq

m

fouroonnlmtlbytho
mutmumottbocnnoftho

Mucupmatutdmm-nnndinhhlon.

mow

q»:

u;
1“v

"

Input-uhthouinqunu-hcﬂihtmottbﬂgg

�9i

was.“

43-3:

:2
.'.w

-.....&lt;

.

entegonised the convulsions ea did ediphenine.
end

80 525A eholished the tonic
The

“upload,

piprsdol

phase.

effect of ease of the etereotios

of phenoherhitel is shun in rehle

III.

The

on the

ties of

fieently shortened with eech eta-pound used while the
motion ves signifieestly prolonged .
Further iﬂicetioe of the

menus

station

onset use sini—

antics of

W
'

of
intuitw of this
phenobdbdtslestienoenheseenieml. Thesedese-reqeeu

“1;" de-oeetrete the relstive effectiveness Iillitrsl for sillin.

oftheseeaepeueds. Ghleqreeesinenetheeestpetent,vhileheaee-

tylilee-dﬁistolsppeeredsoneuhetsinilsrteeeohethc. Assenlonoludeepreh-eteverethelessteffeetive. heelepeofthe
dose—response serve

those of the other

W

for syn-chaste ves eon-idem}; different

Ms.

ft.

Ietea-pretstienoftheseusultseetethesieilerityes
difference of the site of eetien oh the cents-.1 eel-m get. is

dqndent upon our knowledge of the feces of «tier: of the oomlsellt
scents. lhile this leeelieetion of oesttel ooenlsent entice is not
definitely known, it is geeenlly shoddged tht
estspredoninenthontheoerehreloortez, whiletheledllhryull
pontine regions ere less sensitive. Pia-atom hes its pads-insist
eetion on hulher structures ehile stryehine sets st e lever level ef
the oerehroepdml uis. Iieotine is believed to
its outrel

We

convulssnt sotion

We

st the level of the dimephlel.
Itnstheeeknovledgedthsttheoonvueentsestsinltueasly

st different

1evels of th- centre]. nervous

mun.

Onr

results suggest

�4—H-

tht

the coupon!!- which inﬂuence the clone

combat ”turn of on.

ormoftboonmﬂwdnaﬂwtcmlnumottbm
'

norm mun.
equal-on of attraction by

uni

unta do“ not mac-urn: in); tint than
sive sci-urn m tux-notion, or can

of that: «foot

any

We

modify

;_

ﬂu

comma

and

pt you.“ little

which

for

or

”Nectar-1mm

a

India

southconvul-

anal norm

n

".0111. action

mnu(1955)hndumbdthamotﬂ52ﬂ
out
pound
Mott-alternation.
h"
a
mutant
M
u muting

«wwwtwomwmumsmum
pro-um. HtmjutmmmhmMmM
road“;
:- mated
We W
Mona-don
of

with chlorine-I130, a

12

”5&amp;10mootdnmhcttogtuohurnd.

moxnmwwmamumadnmmw
roar.

MIMummtm-QOWMhnuW

Mun-t0.

“1pm, t p.“

_

Anti-p.110,

walla him“.-

mnwtomﬂnuuou
mumthmmmwm1956). noun a» £1955)
all
or mum.- (noun a: mm

“WWn-imﬂnnnwmmw

�-5-5-§-

want.

nativity, team-r with

m «not on .11 four «mum,

mmiupwmuummumm

ﬂththoomtimudduhmwm
utionotthownuminumtmumha
b..tumuutiou
mm,
tyxino,
dentin-W We”.
Moon-ow.
Marmara-sin,
murmur“.

0!.thqu

and mute]. on

Wuumlmmwwmmmmm.

u«.mmmmuuatunmmmﬂﬁo
Pavia”mmmuamwunuuu.
nub-WWmenth-pnmottm

I:

Wd‘O/UO.

mnummwwwmummﬁm

innaundtmmutthMp-éﬂyw

,.

"a

I.
(Wingw,
WW
(1957)

In many Mdmtuuuu u cm.
do.)

an

udulM-(uquu-mwaaumaw
mum-g mmummwormm.“

mmamumumutuwmd
Wu.utuqaumutbunuuwuunua
of'utomdow.

.;

mmmamwwwmwmm
«www.m-mwwmwmum
mthmuopotuqupcumuthuuuuu. Wanna
uh
mm‘mrmmumuugmcm

mm... nulmmmmu-mmzu- MM
mumumm(m,uumm19ﬂ).

�”IL-*-

1

:1.
u“-

1‘

a

A

.

.

:\

1

:

1

~=‘-&lt;‘Wlﬂ-me~4

a“

airﬁai’iw"

..

MmmtnottmoIWNLWn-(I)
(l)uluuy¢loao1(l)ondlnuuctw
m1“),

mu
umcwwaomphmmul.

.1

�m

Wu,morp1nn,uprobmto,uuqmm1,
nova-.1 «Ml-cum. any-um proau. utma;
of
Ion
clouo
to
thMM.”
tumult” nth c unpai1.

Wm

mun-mu,
1311.00.

manual,

am

or

3100“...th-

w

‘

2.

mule-91d
um,
Mnmnu,m1u,

wuwmulot,hnuonndiﬁ~ityofm

awmumnmtmdammuw.
ummammuaummm
3.

“Wham-WMuRMtme-Mdm
umumd,n-¢om,mw,wmorm
“ulna-mm
ammotu-Wtyuw-n
munu1ummnmmmwm.m1m
'

A.

W
muamudmpoumu.
to

«mm.
3M0
)uuu

n
V

«

,

~

;,
s.

z
.
1,,
..

(.9;

A

a.»

you.
man
mm
I

Mm¢ha3a11vaé2r$imH

lMMﬁAxtﬁ-m¥*-"‘m&amp;héw«gu

\

�.74).?—

W

in with to ﬂunk

thou orpniutiom for

tonal-3
tolu-

"11111310 tho
wm":

~WW»II"M

~

..--M-

.....,...

n...

..

9..

.

Ml!....;

that cart“! in nun.
,

“I‘M“
Ia Met, IJ.

m1.“

E11100
0000.

8" 525A

0000.

W

Pipndol

m.
m

mm
man

ad

to

mu,m.

0.0..

“10mm

3x

,:;"'-.

55.1.6

at“ -.
.iﬁmi-ﬂiaﬁ.“

.0

‘ “a

.3...

W.
“an,”

oo;oo

'5

1

W,
m

M

.1“. n1” ‘Pun.

.'

4.52.

-

�Box-pr,

r.n.. J.

m1.

Borg-r, LIL. Ann.

M,
mu,

0.,
0.,

1.x. And.

11m”.

Int.

India, 3.,Sloro,

1954.

m.

“1.

301.

J. nan-«1.

m... mm,

413

1957, 91, 685

1955.19,?”
1956.
0.1..

n. an

an Pllvu, 1..

“maxim, am,
’0, ”3‘"
8..
m.
Win,nun-t.W,

1956.13.14:
IO,
‘0'

3..

M m1.

1953, 23: 305

Arch.

ad mun.

mm,

0.11.,

1:19..

0.11., and

5m

1., Apt: Pint-001. ct renal.
1955.
tended.
at
not:

“J,‘.,

git
?

m.

1133

m MOD», '0'
1956,

run-«1.
a.
r..,:.
at
my...
mama,
320
1957,
tron.
MI.
1.
and
lb
:.n.
sun,
Wall,
In
1957,
and
pro“.
3001.1,
1.3.,
aura, 9., ll», IJ.
3.3.

1955.

1949,

99

n.
we
n.

3&amp;6

��‘

.........,.,

4

8n»

AU 8.
_

Ian-av.

8m.

o8

08

so

an»

8.

on.

a...

8. a.

a.

:

an»?

u n

,5
9.5.

.3.an

.

“at.

LED-

..,..y

�CV

A3

ot'oﬂg

gwgong

p.»

aw.a.p.uv

pro

Acto.9.wv

.

a.»

Au.~.w..v

u.w

or»

Aarqnarov

a o

~u...u.nv

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67474">
                <text>Files and reprints: hallucinogens and EEG, 1958 (folder title 1/2).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67475">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67476">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-13-014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67477">
                <text>1958</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67478">
                <text>Various authors</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67479">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67480">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67481">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67482">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67483">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80950">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87511">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94072">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100633">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6749" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6543">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c577bc7f069484c31c474ab088079b96.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ecc528f0eb233cc9aa9e8503f0092d28</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107148">
                    <text>OF'
THE EFFECTS
CERTAIN DRUGS ON
CEREBRAL SYNAPSES
By

Amedeo S. Marrazzi

Reprinted from

ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
APR 3 0 1qt§9
‘ ‘
Volume 66, Article 3, Pages 496—507
March 14, 1957
DEPARTMENTOF
.

EXPERIMENT”

PSYBH‘HRY

SIDE HOSPlTN-

Hug-LEN OAKS. N- Y-

�THE EFFECTS OF CERTAIN DRUGS ON CEREBRAL SYNAPSES
By Amedeo S. Marrazzi
Velerans Administration Research Laboratories in Neuropsye/ziatry,
Veterans Administration II ospital, Pittsburgh, Pa.
As Edward Evarts has so clearly indicated in his contribution to this volume,
we are all interested in determining the neurophysiological correlates of mental
disturbance in the hope of thereby gaining an inkling of its underlying mech—

anisms and developing a rational therapy for it. Humphry Osmond has
drawn a dramatic picture of the opportunity presented by the situation made
possible by the psychotomimetic drugs, which afford us the means of inducing
at will a reversible model psychosis. This model psychosis, even though it
bears only a fragmentary resemblance to schizophrenia, nevertheless simulates
certain aspects of mental disturbance by perhaps similar mechanisms. Furthermore, the so-called model psychosis also can be shortened and terminated
is
in
effectiveness
clinical
which
for
schizophrenia
will
the
tranquilizers
at
by
claimed. The use of drugs as tools thus creates favorable conditions for studies of mental illness.
Our efforts, as investigators, are directed more toward an intelligent applica—
tion of the hypotheses of mechanism rather than toward simple clinical evaluation. The conditions that we wish to interpret are fully and truly exhibited in
man but, before we can take full advantage of controlled conditions induced in
humans, it is necessary to perform some prototype experiments in animals
since, in such experiments, more procedures are permissible and in them those
experiments intended for man can be constructed and rehearsed. This pur—
is
be
humans
with
work
before
done,
needed
can
the
my
groundwork
pose,
justiﬁcation for presenting some data on animals and making comparisons
with clinical conditions and experimentally induced conditions in man.
FIGURE 1 summarizes the data that led my co—workers and me to a hypothesis that served as the point of departure for studies in this ﬁeld.1 It
shows that in our survey of a variety of sites in the nervous system we ﬁnd, as
far as we have gone, that a consistent reciprocal relationship exists between
excitation or enhancement by acetylcholine and acetylcholinelike substances,
including anticholinesterases, on synaptic-transmission phenomena and inhibition by epinephrine, norepinephrine, all sympathomimetic amines in varying degrees, and related substances.2 It seemed plausible that any perversion
of metabolism that would distort the balance of endogenous chemical or
neurohumoral control of synaptic-transmission processes could lead to abnormal cerebral performance or mental disturbance, and that chemicals or drugs
could alter the equilibrium of transmission and thereby alter cerebral and
mental function in the direction of health or disease.
The limitations of communication with animals make it exceedingly difﬁcult,
though not impossible, to relate the behavioral disturbances that can be produced in them with mental disturbance in man. Since our basic premise, however, is that all cerebral function, including both behavior and mental proc—
in
series
and
in
accumulated
parallel
of
units
is
functional
made
esses,
up
496

�Marrazzi: Effects of Certain Drugs on (‘erebrztl Synapses 497
SIMILARITY

OF

CHOLINERGIC

EXCITATION

AND

ADRENERGIC

INHIBITION

AT

VARIOUS

SYNAPSES

ACETYLCHOLINE

ATROPINE

0R

CURAFIE

ANTICHOLINESTERASE

TEA

EPINEPHRIQJE

mnzpmepuamz
AMPNETAMINE

Epnsonms

(-)

CORTEX

‘MIDBRAIN

(—)

~n£spmnoav

(_)

CENTER

PARASYMPATNETIC
GANGLIA

(-)

svunmznc
GANGLIA

(_)

”c/

(-I

6.23536: *

-----------

553%?

(

-

4 ENHANCEMENT

3' BLOCK
‘I HONOLOGUE OF SVMPATHETIC

mcounzn
OF

**

GANGLION

FIGURE

an. , _______

(-)

INHIBITION
CNOLINERGIC

EXPERIMENTS

2‘ DEPRESSION

EFFECTS
IN

PROGRESS

1

combinations to form patterns, I believe it of value to study such units,
that is, the synapses.
The transparent model of the brain of the cat (FIGURE 2) illustrates a relatively simple synaptic* preparation that we have found convenient for study.
I must emphasize, at the outset, that we consider the experiment pertinent to
the extent that it deals with visual pathways, since the powerful psychotomi—
metic drugs exhibit an important Visual component in the hallucinations,
dramatically so with mescaline. More important than that, our ﬁndings im—
press us with the similarities rather than the differences between synaptic per—
formance and susceptibility to chemicals, either endogenous or exogenous
(drugs). Therefore, we are really using the transcallosally activated cerebral
synapses in the visual area of the cat merely as representative of cerebral
synapses in general, all of these synapses having qualitative similarities and
varying principally by differences of threshold. We do not intend to suggest
that an alteration in this speciﬁc pathway is necessarily responsible for mental
disturbanceT A little later I shall outline a general working hypothesis based
‘ “Synapse” is used throughout in the sense of designating the total complex involved
the functional arat
ticulation of 2 neurons, that is, presynaptic nerve ends, transmission process, postsynaptic dendrites, and soma.
’r Chronic
interruption in a system such as the transcallosal. as mentioned by Edward Evarts, should not necessarily be expected to produce the same changes as an acute interruption by drugs unaccompanied by surgical

trauma and subsequent degenerative processes.

�498

Annals New York Academy of Sciences
93
.5“

.Qaﬁda

05
mm

399%

@003

.3235

029533

33.

Saginaw

Qumozaumqnbv

18:38.35

gobs—Tm

wagon?

£35

2:
we

1:58

“223359

.12.—

.

.N

35c

5:...

~
A

688.:

.

�Marrazzi: Effects of Certain Drugs on Cerebral Synapses 499
patterns that results from alteration in amounts of
synaptic regulators or in the thresholds of the neurons upon which they act.
Since Edward Evarts has already outlined our technique I can be very brief
in pointing out certain features. Because the brain is a communication system
it seems most appropriate to measure function by recording the handling of a
test message. The test message is supplied in the form of a submaximal elec—
trical stimulus applied to 1 optic cortex in a cat that has received a. light dosage
of pentobarbital sodium. This stimulus initiates a conducted response in the
association or transcallosal tract that connects the stimulated point to a sym—
metrical point in the contralateral cortex where, after synaptic. transmission,
the stimulation evokes a cortical potential, as first described by Curtis and
Bard.3 To help distinguish between peripheral effects that would contribute
to the afferent drive constituting the background against which the impulses
are elicited and the strictly central effects, we take advantage of the fact. that
an intracarotid injection will achieve a transient, higher concentration of drug
on the ipsilateral or recording side but, when diluted by the blood in the general
circulation, the concentration of the drug is brought down to levels that are
below the threshold for the peripheral effects. Under the conditions of our
experiment, the amounts of the drug passing through the circle of Willis to the
other cortex are unimportant.
In this way it becomes possible to demonstrate (FIGURE 3) that epinephrine,
a chemical natural to the body, one known to produce anxiety when accumu—
lated in sufﬁcient amounts, either endogenously or exogenously, also produces
cerebral synaptic inhibition, as indicated by the reduction in the signal (surface

on a disruption of normal

negative wave) corresponding to outflow, while the inﬂow (surface positive
wave) is essentially unaltered. The same type of synaptic inhibition is shown
for another cerebral neurohumor, norepinephrine, in the next line of the same

IOO
LIV.

IOO ”\4

The cerebral synaptic action of epinephrine and norepinephrine in a 2-neuron intercortical (transcallosal) system. Potentials are evoked in the optic cortex by the electrical stimulation of a symmetrical point
m the contralateral cortex. Epinephrine (10 lag/kg.) was injected into the i silateral carotid artery after A.
and norepmephrine (150 lug/kg.) was injected after D. A and D are centre 5, B and E represent inhibition,
and C and F show recovery.
FIGURE 3.

�500

Annals New York Academy of Sciences

0-9-?
H
I

HO

H0

H
I

OH H

I

H

-N\
CH3

EPINEPHRINE (dihydroxy-phenyl—ethonol methyl amine)

h‘h‘,“

”'9?"
HCH3H
AMPHETAMINE (phmyl-isopropyl amine)

_*.+

H

__'.+
H

CHSO

MESCALINE (trimethoxy-phenyl-ethyl om'ne)
FIGURE 4.

Types of phenyLethyl amines producing mental effects.

ﬁgure, but this action is evidently weaker than the other, requiring a larger
dose to produce approximately the same degree of inhibition.
In FIGURES 4 and 5 are shown some structural chemical similarities of compounds with which other contributors to this volume have already dealt.
Attention is called to the close structural similarity (FIGURE 4) of epinephrine
to amphetamine, which is also capable of producing anxiety, and mescaline,
which does so regularly and with dramatic intensity, producing a full-blown
“model psychosis.” These drugs in turn are related to the group shown in
FIGURE 5, in which epinephrine15 once more presented alongside a ﬁrst— oxida—
tion product, adrenochrome, which is an indole. Below these are pictured
d- lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD- 25), the very highly potent psychotogen
which can be considered to be built on an indole nucleus, and 5- hydroxy—
tryptamine, or serotonin The epinephrinelike psychotogens thus can be
chemically related to the indolelike ones, including established drugs such as
LSD— 25, reputed drugs such as adrenochrome, described at the beginning of
this monograph by Humphry Osmond, and by myself elsewhere,2 and the
b which is
4“
in
the
postulated by Woolbrain,
naturally occurring indole found
ley and Shaw5 to be sufﬁciently related to LSD- 25 possibly either to compete
with or to add to its action. We now looked to see whether there was any functional parallelism or neurophysiological correlate of this relationship by using
the objective test of cerebral performance afforded by the evoked- potential
ac—
IS
FIGUR126
the
that
data
there
an
showing
the
c.at
presents
in
technique
tual correspondence111 structure, and that all the compounds produce synaptic

�Marrazzi: Effects of ("ertain Drugs on Cerebral Synapses

- EH-c-("6"3

no

no

on

0
——&gt;

0

501

N

has
EPINEPHRINE

H

CON

ADRENOCHROME

/\

Cat's
C2H5

N-CH3

-c-c-NH2

HO

N

N

SEROTONIN

D-LYSERGIC ACID
DIETHYLAMIDE (LSD-25)

FIGURE. 5.

inhibition identical in kind to that produced by epinephrine, but vary in degree
of effectiveness, so that for the approximately equivalent effects shown it re—
quired milligram amounts of mescaline, but only microgram quantities of
LSD-25, which duplicates the relative potency of these compounds as found in
clinical experience. The dosages used throughout our experiments are inten—
tionally of a size selected to produce incomplete actions, so that recovery back‘
to the control level can be secured more readily.
Very interesting is the ﬁnding with serotonin, which turns out to be the most
effective cerebral synaptic inhibitor of all, being effective in as little as l—ug.
doses. Accordingly, rather than being an antagonist, this indole, or something
like it, may represent the type of endogenous substance that is instrumental in
bringing about some forms of spontaneously occurring mental disturbance.
b and is
brain48h
is
in
the
serotonin
since
so
naturally present
Furthermore,
highly potent (about 20 to 25 times as potent as epinephrine in the same experiment), serotonin becomes, as we pointed out over a year ago,2 an even better candidate than either epinephrine or norepinephrine, which are also found
6
1"
for the role of inhibitory neurohumor.* This ﬁnding would
in the brainﬁ‘“
must penetrate the blood-brain barrier at least in the small amounts required to exercise the cerebral action described.
’ Serotonin

�Annals New York Academy of Sciences

502

IOO

MESCALlNE

IOO
UV.

IOO ’D

100‘:
UV.

/

4"
A

A

A

A

'°°”

A

A

SEROTONIN
CONTROL

MAXIMUM

EFFECT

RECOVERY

FIGURE 6.

point even more closely to a derangement of neurohumoral balance at synapses
as a potential mechanism of cerebral or mental derangement.
Unfortunately, except for the intraventricular injections described by Sherwood,7 there have been, thus far, no documented reports of serotonin—induced
mental disturbance* in man that are clearly separable from the natural anxiety
initiated by the profound peripheral effects such as circulatory disturbance,
other autonomic effects, and emesis. There are, however, such reports for a
close analogue of serotonin, dimethyl-serotonin, or bufotenin, which is used
for its mental eﬁects by some primitive peoples and has been observed by
Fabing8 to produce such disturbances in man experimentally. These 2 subof
metabolite
epinephrine that
well
presumed
adrenochrome,
a
as
as
stances,
‘ The fact that patients with carcinoid have large amounts of circulating serotonin without showing marked
has develsym toms of mental derangement could represent an adaptation to very high levels of serotoninofthat
such patients
ope and accumulated gradually. This suggestion would account for the relative immunity
to the possible central effects of high doses of serotonin injected intravenously.

�Marrazzi: Effects of Certain Drugs on Cerebral Synapses 503
CONTROL

MAXIMUM

EFFECT

SEROTONIN

IO pg

RECOVERY

nomcwcnmn,
N

H0

/hCH-

/kg.

CH 3

CHEN'CH’

./\N

H

BUFOTENIN
0=

0:

5 pg /kg

MON
/

N
H

ADRENOCHROME 2000 pg/kg.
FIGURE 7. (‘erebral synaptic inhibition by indoles in a _2-neuron intercortical (transcallosal) system. The
potentials evoked in‘the cerebral cortex of the cat by electrical stimulation of the contralateral cortex every 2
seconds. The injections were given in the 1psxlateral common carotid artery.

Hoffer, Osmond, and Smythies9 report as reproducing some aspects of the clini—
cal syndrome of schizophrenia when injected intravenously in man, are com—
pared in the cat in FIGURE 7. Again, all these compounds have the identical
qualitative effect, namely, synaptic inhibition, but bufotenin, tested in the same
animal, exhibits twice as much effectiveness as does serotonin, which required
10 pg. for its effect on this occasion. Adrenochrome, though it does induce
synaptic inhibition, requires so large a dose, 2 mg, that it seems an unlikely
candidate for the role of endogenous psychotogen responsible for a form of
mental illness, although a substance somewhat like it might be responsible.
The great effectiveness of serotonin not only suggests that this is the type
of chemical structure implicated, with the reservations already noted, but that
it constitutes 1 link, another being its natural occurrence in the brain, in the
chain of evidence identifying it as a cerebral neurohumor. A required piece
of information to round out this evidence would be the measurement of the
actual liberation of serotonin during, or prior to, the recorded synaptic activity.
This is a tedious and difficult type of experiment, and it is attended by special
handicaps in work on the brain. Another approach leading to a similar conclusion, however, is quite readily followed. This approach is the accumulation
of what must be naturally occurring serotonin, strategically located at the
synapses, by the poisoning of the enzymes that normally lead to the destruction
of serotonin and account for the ready reversibility and short duration of the
action of serotonin. This is the technique that has been used so successfully
in the study of the function of acetylcholine in the brain, and it is in this manner,
by the use of a powerful anticholinesterase, that we demonstrated the presence
and operation of acetylcholine at cerebral synapses.1 Serotonin is known to
be very susceptible to destruction by monoamine oxidase, which is abundantly

�504

Annals New York Academy of Sciences

CONTROL

EFFECT
RECOVERY
FIQURE 8. The cerebralsynaptic action of iproniazidin a 2-ncuron intercortical ttranscallosal) system.
potentials evoked in the optic cortex of the cat by electrical stimulation of the contralatcral cortex every
onds. The iproniazid (S mg./lu;.) was injected into the ipsilateral carotid artery.
MAXIMUM

The
2

sec-

present in the brain.10 We therefore attempted to inhibit. this enzyme by
iproniazid (Marsilid). FIGURE 8 shows the result of a preliminary experiment
in which we injected iproniazid into the common carotid artery of the cat. in
the same way that we had done previously with serotonin. The effect produced duplicated the serotonin effect as if, indeed, the serotonin at the synapse
had been preserved by the inhibition of monoamine oxidase by the iproniazid.
I believe this ﬁnding offers another piece of important evidence that serotonin
is present naturally, not only in the brain, but at strategic sites where it is capable
of inﬂuencing synaptic transmission. We have not as yet measured, as we
need to do, how much this dose of iproniazid, given in this way, inhibits cerebral
monoamine oxidase in the cat.
We believe that the somewhat discouraging attitude of some investigators
toward basing clinical prediction on animal experimentation is not, entirely
justiﬁed, since this procedure is a natural result of the comparison of objective
criteria such as we have just described with clinical evaluation based upon
questionnaires and much undoubtedly shrewd clinical observation, both of
these types of data being very difficult, indeed impossible, to quantitate. Ac—
cordingly, we are more impressed by the degree of correspondence obtainable
rather than by the discrepancies that are to be found. Thus our evoked-potential experiments in the cat rank the psychotogens and psychotomimetic substances studied so far, in general, in the order of clinical effectiveness, and they
suggest that at least part of the mechanism responsible for mental disturbance
is to be found in an imbalance in the regulation of synaptic transmission.
One such imbalance we have already described.
If this hypothesis is truly useful, and if the animal preparation used bears
other than a merely empirical relation to the clinical data, we should expect
that. the various tranquilizers for which varying degrees of clinical success have
been claimed would have some action here also. “'e proceeded to test this
extension of our thinking, and we found that all of the several types of tranquilizers are capable, when administered prophylactically to cats, of partially
preventing, in the doses used, the cerebral synaptic inhibition of a test dose of

mescaline.

this reaction, using chlorpromazine ('l‘horazine). 'l‘he figures now read from top to bottom instead of from left to right, as in the previous
FIGURE 9 shows

�Marrazzi: Effects of Certain Drugs on Cerebral Synapses 505
MESCALNE

2.5mg/kg

MESCALINE AFTER CHLORPROMAZINE

CHLORPROMAZNE

0.05mg./kq.

CONTROL

MAﬂMUM

EFFECT

RECOVERY

60’\.

200

UV.

The_prevention of the mescaline effect by chlorpromazine in a 2-neuron_intercortical (transcallosal)
system. The potentials evoked in the cerebral cortex ofthe cat by electrlcal stimulation of the contralateral cortex every 2 seconds. The injections were made in the 1psrlateral common carotid artery.
FIGURE 9.

The ﬁrst column shows the control, the mescaline inhibition at B,
and the recovery at C. After this, chlorpromazine is given in doses which,
per se, have no apparent effect on synaptic transmission, as shown by the new
control D in the second column, but now when mescaline is given again, the
synaptic inhibition E is much reduced when compared to B. Without the
tranquilizers, the same degree of inhibition of mescaline can be repeated several
times in succession, provided that complete recovery is allowed between in—
jections. Records G and II show again that this dose of chlorpromazine did
not impede synaptic transmission despite the ability of the drug to protect
against mescaline. If the dose is increased twentyfold it does have a depressant

ﬁgures.

MESCALINE
A

2.5 mg./kq.

MESCALINE

AFTER RESERPINE

D

CONTROL

B
MAXIMUM

EFFECT

C

RECOVERY

n
E

RESERPINE

0.lmg./kg.

G

m
I

The prevention of the mescaline effect by reserpine in a 2-neuron intercortical (transcallosal)
system. The potentials evoked in.tlie cerebral cortex of the cat by electrical stimulation of the contralateral
cortex every 2 seconds. The anCCtlonS were given in the ipsilateral common carotid artery.
FIGURE 10.

�506

Annals New York .‘Xcademy of Sciences
MESCALINE

CONTROL

MAXIMUM

2.5m/llq.

MESCALINE

AFTER

FRENOUEL

FRENOUEL

tqu/kq.

m

The prevention-of the mescaline effect by It‘renquel in a Z-rieuron intercortical (transcallosal)
system. The potentials evoked In the cerebral cortex of the cat by the electrical stimulation of the contralateral
cortex every 2 seconds. The unections were given in the ipsilateral common carotid artery.
FIGURE 11.

action on synaptic transmission. The same prophylactic action is obtained
with reserpine (Serpasil), as shown in FIGURE 10, and with azacyclonol (\lt‘renquel), as shown in FIGURE 11. Another point of correspondence with clinical
findings is that the margin of safety, in this case the range between the prophy—
lactic and the synaptic-depressant, dose, is large, the depressant dose being 15
to 20 times the prophylactic. dose with both chlorpromazine and azacyclonol,
but the factor is only 2 with reserpine. The latter drug approximates the
action of the barbiturates, which can reduce the degree of demonstrable inhibition from mescaline by reducing synaptic transmission in the ﬁrst place.
I feel justiﬁed in saying, then, that the preparation described is pertinent to
the clinical situation in that it ranks the psychotomimetic substances in the
order of their clinical eli'ectiveness, and that the action of mescaline, the only
drug that we have tried so far, is prevented by the tranquilizers.
By use of the evoked—potential technique, we have demonstrated that:
(1) There exists an equilibrium of neurohumoral control of transmission at
cerebral synapses and throughout the nervous system, as far as I have surveyed
it, that is susceptible to distortion and imbalance by disturbance in the amounts
of chemical regulator or the susceptibility of neurons.
(2*) The psychotogens and psychotomimetic substances discussed. structurally and functionally resemble the actions of the fairly well-established inhibitory synaptic neurohumors, epinephrine and norepinephrine, and of sero—
tonin, the new one that we have described.
(.3) Serotonin or its dimethyl derivative, bufotenin, comes close, even closer
than does LSD-25, to representing the type of endogenous psychotogen that
might be a natural cause of some forms of mental disturbance.
We speculate that such disturbance can be produced by direct perversion of
normal patterns of neuronal activity by the undue inﬂuence of synaptic inhibitors or, indirectly, by such inhibitors impeding the ﬂow of impulses from
higher controlling centers and releasing the more 1,)rimitive, simpler, and less
well—adapted patterns of activity that we call abnormal.

�Marrazzi: Effects of Certain Drugs on Cerebral Synapses 507
References
1. MARRAzzr,

118: 367.

A. S.

1953.

Some indications of cerebral humoral mechanisms.

Science.

E. R. HART. 1955. Relationship of hallucinogens to adrenergic
cerebral neurohumors. Science. 121: 365.
3. CURTIS, H. J. &amp; P. HARD. 1939. lntercortical connection of the corpus callosum. 126:
2. MARRAZZI, A. S. &amp;

473.

B. B. CRA\\'F()RD &amp; J. H. GADDUM. 1954. The distribution of substance P and 5—hydroxytryptamine in the central nervous system of the dog. J.
Physiol. 126: 596.
4}). PAGE, I. H.
1954. Serotonin (5—hydroxytryptamine). Physiol. Revs. 34: 563.
5. WOOLLEY, D. W. &amp; E. SHAW. 1954. A biochemical and pharmacological suggestion
about certain mental disorders. Science. 119: 587.
6. VOGT, M. 1954. The concentration of sympathin in different parts of the central
nervous system under normal conditions and after the administration of drugs. J.
Physiol. 123: 451.
7. SHERWOOD, S. L. 1955. The responses of psychotic patients to intraventricular injections. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 48: 855.
FABING, H. D. 1955. Personal communication.
99°
HOFFER, A., H. OSMOND &amp; J. SMYTHIES. 1954. Schizophrenia: a new approach. II.
Result of a year’s research. J. Mental Sci. 100: 29.
10. KOELLE, G. B. &amp; A. DE T. VALK, JR. 1954. Physiological implications of the histochemical localization of monoamine oxidase. J. Physiol. 126: 434.

4a. AMIN, A. H. T.,

'1‘.

�APR

23

‘959

DEPARTMENT OF
EXPERIMENTAL PSYBHMIRY

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS, N. Y.

�PSYCHOTOMIMETICS, CLINICAL AND THEORETICAL
CONSIDERATIONS: HARMINE, WIN-2299 AND NALLINE

17%;»4”

M :9

HARRY H. PENNES, M. D.,

PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND

PAUL H. HOCH, M. D., NEW

Reprinted from

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Vol. 113, No. 10, April, 1957

YORK CITY

�PSYCHOTOMIMETICS, CLINICAL AND THEORETICAL
1
WIN-2299
AND
CONSIDERATIONS: HARMINE,
NALLINE
HARRY H. PENNES, M.D.,2

PHILADELPHIA, PA., AND

This report describes the clinical effects
of 3 psychotomimetics in mental patients.
The results will be related to nosological and
certain biological aspects of the “model psychoses” in general. The agents are (I) harmine, an alkaloid present in plant prepara—
tions ingested by some South American
tribes(1) ; (2) Win-2299, a synthetic
cholinolytic(2) and (3) N-allylnormorphine
(Nalline), a synthetic morphine antagonist
(3, 4, 5).
MATERIAL AND METHODS

Single dosages of the drugs were given
to 32 voluntary, physically normal mental
patients, at the New York State Psychiatric
Institute; 29 were in the 18-35 year age
range; 19 were males and I 3 females.
Twenty-two were schizophrenics of the
pseudoneurotic and other nondeteriorated
types, with only the primary symptoms of
the disorder. Five additional schizophrenics
had auditory hallucinations or delusions be—
fore the drugs. The remaining 5 subjects
had severe psychoneuroses or recurrent depressions. No patient had clouding of consciousness. Each drug was given about 9: 00
and
breakfast
after
a 48-hour
light
a
am,
medication-free period. Examination by the
authors and nurses were made for the remainder of the day in a shaded private room
and also in the succeeding 72 hours. No
patients were informed of the probable effects of the procedures. Most subjects
showed excellent cooperation in reporting
drug effects. In most cases, each patient received one drug of the 3 tested, but some
received different doses of harmine on differRead at the 112th annual meeting of The American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, Ill., April 30May 4, 1956.
2 Director of Clinical Research, Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, Philadelphia, Pa.
3 Commissioner of Mental Hygiene, New York
State.
The actual study was performed at the New York
Psychiatric Institute, New York, Department of
Experimental Psychiatry.
1

PAUL H. HOCH, M. D.,3 NEW

YORK CITY

ent days. Each drug was given in salt form
but for brevity will be referred to as the
base.
RESULTS
GENERAL

Since the new manifestations under the
drugs were not present in the pre-administration period, they were clearly distinguishable from the patients’ baseline symptoms. At low dosage, each drug produced
slight drowsiness, either with or without
other symptoms. With medium or high
dosage, the reactions qualitatively resembled
those in a former series of similar subjects
who received mescaline or LSD(6, 7, 8).
Thus, diffuse alterations usually occurred
in many realms—autonomic, motor, perceptual, emotional, intellectual, and be—
havioral. Unlike mescaline or LSD (cf.
Discussion for dosages), the present drugs
regularly elicited some degree of clouding of
consciousness in addition to the preceding
changes. The characteristic reaction at
medium or high dosage was a semidelirioid
or confusional state with intermittent drowsiness or sleep. The confusional periods
were cyclic. Their intensity and time of
occurrence correlated only partly with drowsiness or sleep. Major symptoms were
impairment of contact, attention, grasp, responsiveness, and concentration, with general “dreamy” or twilight quality. Full delirioid reactions occurred in 2 subjects at
the highest dosages of 2 drugs (Win-2299,
Nalline). Most subjects had intermittent
amnesia during the reaction itself but were
able to provide adequate descriptions of the
major events. A spotty defect in recall was
usually present in the 72-hour follow-up
period.
Visual hallucinations (cf. Discussion for
alternative terminology) occurred at medium
or high dosage with all 3 drugs. Subjects
were easily roused after the onset of drowsiness or sleep and reported some of the hallucinations that had occurred in the “dream887

�888

CONSIDERATIONS OF PSYCHOTOMIMETICS

ing” state. In all cases, the hallucinations
occurred only with eyes closed and disappeared promptly when the eyes were opened.
Hallucinations other than visual were infre—
quent. Perceptual distortions of body and
environment were moderately frequent.
Neurological changes included varying degrees of subjective vertigo, light—headedness,
subjective and objective ataxia, and sluggish
speech. Like mescaline and LSD, these
drugs produce a variable degree of intensiﬁcation of different types of baseline symptoms. Harmine also occasionally produced
a shallow euphoria. Nalline often produced
relaxation of rather marked degree. After
a few initial hours of peak intensity, reac—
tions usually subsided gradually between the
fourth to eighth hours, often with ﬂuctuations in degree before complete remission.
No subject reported effects after 24 hours
except for minor, nonspeciﬁc “hangover”
feelings.
INDIVIDUAL DRUGS

Harmine.——Turner, Merlis, and Carl have

recently pointed out that the alleged hallucinogenic activity of pure harmine is a complicated issue on the basis of the previous
literature on crude plant extracts(9). The
threshold hallucinogenic dose of the pure
drug in the present study ranged from I 50.0—
200.0 mgm. intravenously. With this route,
5 of 11 subjects reported visual hallucinations of varying degrees of complexity and
organization. Bradycardia and hypotension
occurred with all doses of intravenous harmine despite a 20- to 30-minute injection
time, thereby limiting maximum dosage to
300.0 mgm. Average maximum changes
were a pulse rate of 18 beats per minute and
systolic blood pressure fall of 16 mm. mertermi—
in
was
one
subject
Injection
cury.
nated at 210.0 mgm. because pulse rate
dropped from 82 to 48 per minute and blood
pressure from 118/78 to 88/60. Recovery
occurred in about 30 minutes. The drug was
not hallucinogenic by the oral or subcuta—
neous routes. However, ingestion of crude
plant extracts by natives does produce visual
hallucinations according to ﬁeld observations(10, 11, 12). In an experimental study
by Cardenas(13), normal subjects also reported visual hallucinations and other effects

[Apr.

noted here, after ingestion of an aqueous
solution of yahé (Banisteria caapi, a source
of harmine). Visual hallucinations might
have occurred in the present study with
higher oral (loses, the maximum oral amount
(960.0 mgm.) being 4.8-6.4 times greater
than the intravenous threshold hallucinogenic
amount (150.0-200.o mgm.). The amounts
of harmine taken orally under ﬁeld conditions and in Cardenas’ study are unknown,
precluding comparison with the present
study. Further analysis of the hallucinogenic
activity of harmine is complicated by nu—
merous botanical and chemical considerations(1, 10, 11, 14).
Additional reactions to harmine which
occurred frequently were: nausea and vomit—
ing; slow, coarse, spontaneous tremor of the
extremities of an “extrapyramidal” appear—
ance; humming and buzzing noises (no
voices); “waviness” of the environment;
“sinking” sensations of the body; subjective
sense of body vibration; and subject numb—
ness, accompanied by objective evidence of
reduced sensitivity to light touch and pinprick. These reactions, plus all the preceding, occurred in almost every patient with
the intravenous route; and (except for hallucinations) some occurred with oral dosages
higher than the threshold of 3000-4000
mgm. The reactions were generally more
intense by the former route.
Win-2299.—The mental effects of Win2299 in man have apparently not been described previously. The 2 subjects receiving
2.0 mgm. had the sedative effect. One of
these subjects in addition became “hypersensitive” to light and sound, and spots on
the wall moved and changed form. At the
6.0 mgm. level, all 4 subjects had severe
mescaline- or LSD-like reactions plus a confusional state of moderate degree. These
mescaline-like effects included bizarre perceptual distortions of soma and environment,
unreality feelings, and synesthesias in one
case. The single subject at 10.0 mgm. had
a full delirioid episode with complete loss of
contact, disorientation for time, place, and
person, and responses to complex, organized
visual and auditory hallucinations. This reaction occurred in brief but cyclic episodes;
partial contact and lucidity were restored
after persistent comments and questions.

�I957]

HARRY H. PENNES AND PAUL H. HOCH

Most subjects had a moderate degree of
mydriasis; blood pressure and pulse rate
changes were insigniﬁcant.
Nall-ine.—The results with Nalline in the
main conﬁrmed previous observations of
others in different types of subjects, includ—
ing normals( 3, 4, 5). Past and present
ﬁndings included varying degrees of relaxation or euphoria, anxiety and dysphoria,
miosis, nausea, drowsiness and sleep, thought
disturbances, feelings of heaviness or lightness of limbs, and visual hallucinations. In
the present series, visual hallucinations occurred in the single subject receiving 10.0
mgm., in 7 of 8 at 20.0 mgm., and in 2 of
3 at 30.0 mgm. In 4 cases (and in 2 with
harmine) the hallucinations were Lilliputian
in type, a not infrequent feature of acute
toxic psychoses in general. So far as can
be judged from the literature, a possible
major difference from previous observations
consisted in the occurrence of frank mescaline-like or delirioid reactions. At 20.0 mgm,
3 subjects had typical diffuse, bizarre per—
ceptual disturbances, severe unreality feelings, and other signs of psychic disorganization. At 30.0 mgm., a similar reaction
occurred including auditory hallucinations
and synesthesias. In another subject at this
dose the effect was overtly delirioid, with a
strong resemblance to the Win—2299 toxic
psychosis previously described. The intravenous route probably accounts in part for
the appearance of these reactions, since previous reporters of the mental effects of
Nalline have used the subcutaneous route,
usually at dosages of 10.0-15.0 mgm. and
sometimes higher( 3, 4, 5).
DISCUSSION

Relatively high doses of harmine by the
intravenous route were required to produce
the full psychotomimetic effect with visual
hallucinations. The same was probably true
of Nalline. It is conventionally stated that
acute toxic psychoses occur in apparently
normal individuals after high dosages of
various other drugs, for example, atropine
and cocaine(I5). There is a dearth of precise data on the number of such drugs, dosages required, and regularity of effects.
However, not all drugs in relatively high
dosage produce the diffusely abnormal men-

889

tal changes which are the criteria of psychotomimetic action. For example, clinical
differentiation may be made between a confusional-hallucinatory state and a simple,
progressive depression of level of consciousness elicited by narcotics and other agents.
High dosage alone would therefore not preclude the classiﬁcation of the present or
other drugs as psychotomimetic in a selective or speciﬁc sense. Transient cerebral
anoxia could have resulted from the hypo—
tension and bradycardia with intravenous
harmine or a respiratory depressant action
of Nalline, which has been reported at dosages used in this study(3, 5). The ﬂorid
and diffuse reactions elicited by these 2 drugs
would certainly not appear to be characteristic of those in cerebral anoxia. In addition,
the circulatory effects of harmine usually
disappeared about 20 minutes after termination of injection, whereas the mental re—
actions lasted at least several hours at peak
intensity.
Harmine, Win—2299, and Nalline fundamentally produced an acute organic reaction
type, because of the basic mental clouding
and confusional effects. Harmine and Nal—
line each produced mental clouding together
with systemic toxicity (cf. above) ; on the
other hand LSD and mescaline elicit neither
clouding or toxicity in major form within a
certain dosage range. However, Win-2299
did not display this association of the 2 effects, since severe mental clouding occurred
without obvious systemic toxicity. It is possible that confusional aspects may be more
prominent for a given agent whose threshold
psychotomimetic dosage is high relative to
threshold dosage for any effect. Quantitative data relevant to this proposition are
lacking for any psychotomimetic but are obtainable in principle. It is very probable,
however, that absolute dosage thresholds for
psychotomimetic activity correlate poorly
with mental clouding. In ascending order,
these dosages are very approximately: LSD
(oral or intravenous) under 100 micrograms; Win—2299 (oral) and Nalline (subcutaneous or intravenous) 55.0-20.0 mgm.;
harmine (intravenous) and mescaline (oral
or intravenous) over 100.0 mgm. LSD and
mescaline are at opposite extremes of an
enormous absolute dosage range, and produce

�89o

CONSIDERATIONS OF PSYCHOTOMIMETICS

practcially no clouding whereas the 3 intermediate agents elicit frank clouding at near
threshold.
There is evidence, however, that LSD and
mescaline may produce clouding of consciousness at dosages well above threshold.
Pennes has previously reported a sedative
effect of LSD in 26.0% of a series of schizophrenics(8). The drug less occasionally
(about 10.0% of cases) produced a confusional state(7). MacDonald and Galvin
more recently reported a 58.0% incidence of
mental clouding and confusion after LSD in
50 subjects. The psychotic subjects in their
series apparently received the drug in dosages (per kilogram of body weight) up to
6.0 micrograms as compared with 1.0-2.0
micrograms orally in Pennes’ series(16).
Mescaline sulfate (4oo.o—6oo.o mgm., intravenously) often produces slight drowsiness
throughout the entire reaction and occasional
confusional states(7).
There may be an underlying similarity for
all the drugs under discussion in the relationship of the visual hallucinogenic response
to visual restriction and hypnagogic mechanisms. First, it will be recalled that visual
hallucinations with the present drugs always
disappeared when the eyes were opened.
Wikler noted the same in post-addicts under
mescaline(4). The authors have not noted
this effect in frank form with either mescaline or LSD but have occasionally observed
that hallucinations are reported as less distinct and vivid when the eyes are opened.
Darkening of the room does initiate or intensify visual hallucinations with eyes open
under mescaline or LSD. If eye closure and
reduction of intensity of external light affect drug-induced hallucinations by the same
mechanism, then the difference with respect
to this mechanism may therefore be negligible between the present drugs and LSD.
Such a mechanism may be related to that
presumably operative in hallucinations and
other mental disturbances recently reported
as occurring with generalized restriction of
sensory input(17).
Secondly, the abnormal visual phenomena
with the present drugs are probably best
categorized as hypnagogic hallucinations or
even more broadly as hypnagogic imagery
or visions. This term is used because of the

[Apr.

invariable drowsiness (cf. Results, General) ; disappearance on eye opening is also
consistent with the hypnagogic quality of the
response. According to Ardis and McKellar,
spontaneous visual hypnagogic images in
normals are usually experienced in the
drowsy state and with eyes closed. These
authors also found strong resemblances in
detail between mescaline visual hallucinations and normal visual hypnagogic imagery
(18). Previous workers with Nalline have
variously used the terms visual hallucinations, day-dreaming, vivid visual fantasies in
a dreamy state, or nightmares.
The apparent differences between the
present drugs and mescaline or LSD may
therefore be quantitative rather than qualitative. The conclusion would be that mescaline and LSD may also basically produce an
organic reaction type. It is a familiar ob—
servation that the visual hallucinations which
are so characteristic of the drugs under consideration are relatively infrequent in
chronic schizophrenia. These considerations
obviously do not preclude various possible
relationships between psychotomimetics and
a possible endogeneous “toxic factor” or
metabolic disturbance in the “functional”
psychoses. Hoch and Wikler have recently
and independently summarized the other implications of the drugs and the “model” psychoses for experimental psychiatry(19, 20).
The indole nucleus, alleged to be speciﬁc
for psychotomimetic activity(2I), is absent
in mescaline, Win-2299, and Nalline. How—
ever, with the exception of mescaline, the
remaining 4 psychotomimetics contain a tertiary nitrogen grouping (2 in LSD). Since
these compounds are otherwise grossly dissimilar in molecular conﬁguration (ﬁg. I),
the entire structure undoubtedly has to be
taken into account. Despite this well-known
factor and the very small series of drugs,
there are certain indications that the tertiary
nitrogen grouping may contribute to psychotomimetic activity. In brief, some of the evidence relates to effects of apparently minor
changes in the LSD molecule, effects of
quaternization of VVin-2299 on its CNS potency(2), and comparison of the actions of
serotonin with those of its tertiary amine
derivative, bufotenine(22). However, in ad—
dition to mescaline, the literature reports

�HARRY H. PENNES AND PAUL H. HOCH

I957]

891

other psychotomimetics without the tertiary
nitrogen groupings: marijhuana, which is
n0n-nitr0geneous(9) and 3,4,5-trimethoxy—
amphetamine, a mescaline derivative(23).
9 W: "5
Some types of centrally acting drugs other
OCH3
\ c2 “5
than psychotomimetics also possess the terFuther
of
OCH:
analysis
grouping.
tiary
nitrogen
IE SCALINE
on,
these relationships will be presented elsewhere(24).
There is no apparent common neurophar—
macological basis for the psychotomimetic
action in general and for harmine, Win—2299,
and Nalline in particular(2, 5, 25). Win2299 is qualitatively similar to atropine in
animals by virtue of its peripheral cholinolytic and central actions(2). The mechanism
of production of abnormal mental effects
‘HCL
HO- 0" C- 0' CH2. CH2- /
similar
be
both
for
N\
drugs, Win—2299 apmay
\°2"5
parently having a lower threshold dosage.
2299
(2
2
to recent speculations, some psy—
According
—-—
chotomimetics may produce their effects as
antagonists of cerebral serotonin(26, 27').
N-CH20H=CM2
The mental effects of oral LSD and intravenous harmine (both indoles and peripheral
antiserotonins) differ in many respects (Results, General and Harmine) . The difference
in route of administration is not a factor in
0n
View of the ﬁnding of Hoch that oral and
0
"CL
'
intravenous LSD have the same qualitative
effects(28). However, differences in relative
Structures of Some Psychotomimetics.
levels
contribute
the
to
dosage
apparent
may
FIG. I.—Harmine was supplied in 2 forms: as the
base isolated from Banisteria caapi(I) and as the dissimilarities between the 2 drugs.
c—N

CH35

\

\

HARMINE

NH

LYSERGIC ACID DIETHVLAMDE

C2 H5

6-

D5

WIN-

DIETHYLAMINOETHYL
GLYCOLATE

CH

N

CYCLOPENTYL

THI‘ENVL)

HYDROCHLORIDE

G“
CH2

H

ALLYLNOHMCRPHINE

synthetically-prepared HCl-zHaO. The following
dosages refer to hydrochloride form in each case.
Harmine: oral, II patients, zoo-960.0 mgm.; subcutaneous, 6 subjects, 40.0-70.0 mgm.; and intravenous, II patients, 100.0-3oo.0 mgm. Win-2299
tablets: 7 patients, 2.0-I0.0 mgm. Nalline: intravenous, 12 subjects, 10.0-30.0 mgm. Intravenous
harmine and Nalline were injected over a 20-30
minute period.
Mescaline and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)
were not given in this study. LSD and harmine
contain the indole nucleus whereas the remainder do
not. The tertiary nitrogen grouping is present in
LSD (both in aliphatic chain and cyclic constituent), harmine (non-indole member), Win-2299
(aliphatic side chain), and Nalline (linking allyl
side chain with ring member). Cf. Discussion.
Both forms of harmine were supplied as the dry
compound by Dr. K. K. Chen, Eli Lilly Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana. For parenteral administration, solutions in pyrogen-free distilled water,
20 cms.,3 were used several hours after autoclaving.
Win-2299 was supplied by Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, Rensselaer, N. Y., as the racemic
mixture of the hydrochloride salt. Nalline was supplied by Merck and Co., Rahway, New Jersey, N-

SUMMARY

Harmine, Win-2299, and Nalline in single
dosage produce many new mental effects in
schizophrenics grossly similar to those elicited by mescaline and LSD. Many of the
same effects are reported in normals after
harmine and Nalline (other workers). Unlike mescaline and LSD at usual dosage
levels, the present psychotomimetics regularly produce drowsiness and sleep along
with the aberrant mental effects. The resultant state is partly that of “hypnagogic”
visual hallucinations or imagery. The results
with increased dosage suggest that the basic
Allylnormorphine HC1= Nalline HCI; ampoules of
distilled, pyrogen-free water containing sodium bisulfate, 0.2% and sodium citrate, dihydrate 1.5%.
For intravenous administration, ampoule contents
were diluted up to 20.0 cms.3 with pyrogen-free distilled water.

�892

CONSIDERATIONS OF PSYCHOTOMIMETICS

effect of these agents is to produce an acute

toxic reaction type. The difference between
them and mescaline or LSD with respect to
clouding of consciousness and certain aspects
of the hallucinogenic response may be quantitative rather than qualitative. The indole
nucleus is not necessary in the structure of
psychotomimetics since Win-2299 and Nalline are non-indoles. The tertiary nitrogen
grouping may contribute to certain aspects
of psychotomimetic action.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.

Chen, A. L., and Chen, K. K.

Quart. J.

Pharm. Pharmacol., 12:30, 1939.
2. Luduena, F. P., and Lands, A. M. J. Pharm.
Exper. Therap., 110:282, 1954.
3. Wikler, A., Fraser, H. F., and Isbell, H.
J. Pharm. Exper. Therap., 109: 8, 1953.
4. Wikler, A. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 120: 157-175,
I954.

Lasagna, L., and Beecher, H. K. The Analgesic Effectiveness of Nalorphine and NalorphineMorphine Combinations in Man. J. Pharm. Exper.
Therap., 112: 3 56-363, 1954.
6. Hoch, P. H., Cattell, J. P., and Pennes, H. H.
Am. J. Psychiat., 108: 579, 1952.
7. Hoch, P. H., Pennes, H., and Cattell, J. P.
Proc. Assn. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 32: 287, 1952.
8. Pennes, H. H. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 119:95,
5.

1954-

9. Turner, W. J., Merlis, S., and Carl A. Am. J.
Psychiat., 112:466, 1955.

Perrot, Em, Raymond-Hammett. Bull. Sci.
Pharmacol., 34: 337; 417; 500, 1927.
10.

11.

1941.
12.
195513.

[Apr.

Iberico, C. C. Bol. mus. Hist. Nat., 5:313,
Schultes, R. E. Natural History, 64: 120,

Cardenas, G. F. Estudio Sobre el Principio
Activo del Yagé. Thesis, Universidad Nacional,
Facultuaa de Medicina y Ciencias Naturales,
Bogota, 1923.
14. Albarracin, L. Contribucion al estudio de los
Alcaloides de Yagé. Thesis, Bogota, 1925.
15. Goodman, L., and Gilman, A. Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 2d Ed. New York:
MacMillan, 1955.
16. MacDonald, J. M., and Galvin, J. A. V. Am.
J. Psychiat., 112:970, 1956.
17. Bexton, W. H., Heron, W., and Scott, T. H.
Canad. J. Psychol., 8:70, 1954.
18. Ardis, J. A., and McKellar, P. J. Ment. Sci.,

102:22, 1956.
19. Hoch, P. H. Am. J. Psychiat., 111:787,

I95520. Wikler, A. Am. J. Psychiat., 112 : 961, 1956.
21. Hoffer, A., Osmond, H., and Smythies, J.
J. Ment. Sci., 100: 29, 1954.
22. Fabing, H. D., and Hawkins, J. R. Science,
123: 886, 1956.
23. Peretz, D. I., Smythies, J. R., and Gibson, W.
J. Ment. Sci., 101 : 317, 1955.
24. Pennes, H. H. In preparation.
25. Gunn, J. A. Arch. Internat. de Pharmacodynam.. 50 : 379, 1935.
26. Gaddum, J. H. Drugs Antagonistic to 5-

Hydroxytryptamine. Ciba Foundation Symposium:
Hypertension. pp. 75-77, London, 1953.
27. Wooley, D. W., and Shaw, E. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci., U. 5., 40: 228, 1954.
28. Hoch, P. H. Studies in Routes of Adminis—
tration and Counteracting Drugs. Lysergic Acid
Diethylamide and Mescaline in Experimental Psy—
chiatry. New York: Grune &amp; Stratton, 1956.

��Psychiatria et Neurologia

Internationale Monatssehrltt tiir Psychiatrie und Neurologie
Revue Internationale Mensuelle de Psychiatrie et de Neurologie
International Monthly Review at Psychiatry and Neurology

Editor: J. KLAESI, SchloB Knonau

Redactor: E. GRUNTHAL, Bern

S. KARGER

Basel (Schweiz)

New York
Printed in Switzerland

Vol. 135. No. 4/5, 1958

Separatum

Sal-Hulda, 11.; Brunecker,

G. 11nd Szdra, SL:

Psychiat. Neurol., Basel 135:

285—301 (1958)

Aus dem Staatl. Zentralen Neurologisch-Psychiatrischen Institut in Budapest
(Frau Dr. M. Gimes)

Dimethyltryptamin: ein neues Psychotieum
Von A. SAI-HALASZ, G. BRUNECKER und ST. SZARA

Einleitung
Die ohere Stufe des Entwicklungsprozesses der Fachwissenschaften, die sogenannte experimentelle Stufe, beginnt die Psychiatrie fast als letzte der medizinjschen Féicher nur neuerdings zu

erreichen. Den wirklichen Anfang bedeutet Beringers Monographie
ﬁber Meskalin [1927], mit welcher zu gleicher Zeit die HaschischBeobachtungen von Frdnkel und Joel erschienen. Den zweiten
groBen Fortschritt auf diesem Gebiet bildete die Entdeckung der
Lysergséiurediéithylamid (LSD 25) durch Stall und Hoﬁmann [1943].
Der erste ausfiihrh'che Bericht Stalls [1947] bedeutete den Anfang
einer groBen Anzahl von Publikationen. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist
die Bekanntgabe eines neuen Psychotikums bzw. dessen Wirkung
auf normale Personen.
Die Bewohner Haitis benutzten schon seit

J ahrhunderten bei

religiﬁsen Festen ein narkotisch wirkendes Schnupfpulver, das «Cohoba» genannt wurde. Mit Hilfe dieses Mittels konnten sie angeblich
mit ihren «helfenden Geistern» in Verbindung treten, sogar auch
von diesen Ratschlﬁgen erhalten. Das «Cohoba» wurde aus der
Frucht der Piptadenia Peregrina gewonnen und enthjelt unter anderen Alkaloiden auch verhéiltnisméiﬁig groBe Mengen Bufotenin und
N-N-Dimethyltryptamin (DMT), wie dies auch von Stromberg und
Fish et al. bewiesen wurde. Bufotenin und DMT sind beide Indolamine und in naher Verwandtschaft mit dem biologisch hﬁchst
aktiven Serotonin:

�Sai-Halész, Brunecker und Széra

286

{\/\NH)

/\——-—-—CH2—CH2—NH2
0H
II

|'

OH

A—
1
n

—CH2—CH2—N/CH3
:1

\/\NH/

\cm.

Bufotenin

Serotonin

/CH3
/\————CH2—CH2—N
\CH3

b“
J
\ \NH

N-N-Dimethyltryptamin

Bufotenin ist daher ein N-Dimethyl-Derivat des Serotonins,
beim DMT fehlt jedoch vorigem gegenﬁber eine 5-OH-Wurzel. Das
Bufotenin isolierte Handovski aus der Haut von Kroten [1920],
Wieland hat es synthetisch hergestellt. Raymond Hamet gab Hunden
intravenos Bufotenin und stellte voriibergehende BlutdrucksteigeAﬂ'en
intravenos
fest.
gréBere
Evarts,
Tachypnoe
Apnoe,
spiter
rung,
Dosen Bufotenin und LSD-25 verabreichend, stellte bei jenen eine
beinahe identische Wirkung der zwei Chemikalien fest: voriibergehende Erblindung, Ataxie und ein Zahmwerden. Er erklﬁrte dies
alles durch eine Hemmung der sensiblen Reiziibertragung. Evarts
nahm die Wirkung des Bufotenins und LSD-25 als Analog des
Serotonins an.
Nach Fabing ist Bufotenin ein in der Natur weitverbreitet vorkommendes halluzinogenes Indolderivat, dessen eine Hauptquelle
die sogenannten Amanita-Pilzarten bilden. Fabing experimentierte
an jungen, intelligenten Verurteilten: er injizierte intravent‘is wéihrend 3 Minuten Bufotenin. Es traten Erroten, Gesichtsperspiration
und Kribbelgefiihl im ganzen Korper sowie Oppression in der Brust
auf. Die Versuchspersonen sahen einige Minuten lang purpurne
Flecke, die Storung der Raumwahrnehmung und Konzentration,
daneben Depersonalisationsgefiihl und psychomotorische Unruhe
dauerten fort. Bei groﬁeren Dosen war Erbrechen, Nystagmus und
Mydriasis zu beobachten, deshalb hielt Fabing das Mittelhirn zum
Teil als Angriﬂ'spunkt des Bufotenins. Die kardiovaskulﬁre Wirkung
des Mittels war verhiiltnisméiBig gering. Die Versuchspersonen berichteten wéihrend 6 Stunden nach der Injektion iiber angenehmes
Relaxationsgefiihl.

�Dimethyltryptamin: ein neues Psychoticum

287

Material und Methode
Unseres Wissens nach wurde die Wirkung des DMT am Menschen zuerst durch uns gepriift. Das DMT wurde von uns selbst
synthetisiert nach der von Speeter und Anthony angegebenen Methode. Die salzsﬁurige Losung wurde als Injektion angewandt: die
wirksame Dose war 0,7—1,0 mg/kg intramuskuléir, meistens gebrauchten Wir 0,8 mg/kg.
DMT wurde an 30 normalen Personen, meistens Arzten, gepriift (I7 Manner, 13 Frauen; Alter zwischen 20 und 42 J ahren).
Jede Versuchsperson wurde vorerst somatisch untersucht, und nur
jene erhielten DMT, die vollkommen gesund waren und keine starkere vegetative Labilitéit zeigten. Auf den Blutdruck wurde sehr
geachtet, da das DMT leicht starke Hypertonie erzeugen kann. I6
Versuchspersonen wurden vor und wéihrend des Versuches mit
Rorschach untersucht. (Auf dessen Ergebnisse gehen wir hier nicht
ein, da einer von uns1 auf dem III. Internationalen RorschachkongreB in Rom 1956 iiber diese berichtete.) Wﬁhrend dem Versuch
wurden parallel zwei Protokolle aufgenommen und die Versuchs2—3 Tagen die subjektiven Erlebnisse
nach
aufgefordert,
personen
aufzuzeichnen; die Protokolle wurden dann durch diese Aufzeich5
Fallen wurde wiihrend des Experimentes EEG
In
ergéinzt.
nungen
durchgefiihrt. (Bisher noch nicht veroﬂ'entlicht.)
Ergebnisse
Schon nach 3—5 Minuten nach der Injizierung fﬁngt das DMT
zu wirken an, und innerhalb einer Stunde léiuft die ganze experimentelle Psychose ab. Die Wirkung ist plotzlich und intensiv, mehrere Versuchspersonen berichten anfangs V011 einem weltuntergangsé‘thnlichen Erlebnis mit Starker Todesangst. In einigen Fillen
war jedoch die Angst nicht so ausgepréigt, und die éiuBerst intensiven
Illusionen und Halluzinationen fesselten die Aufmerksamkeit. Die
Angstperioden wechselten mit solchen Starker Euphoric ab. Wéihrend des ganzen Versuches war das wellenartige Auftreten bzw. die
Intensitﬁtsschwankung der gesamten pathologischen Phéinomene
sehr charakteristisch. Wahrnehmungsstﬁrungen bzw. solche des

Korperschemas, Depersonalisationserscheinungen, extrapyramidale
Hyperkynesien, objektive Reﬂex- und Sensibilitﬁtsstﬁrungen fﬁrbten oft das Bild. Natiirlich waren bei den Versuchen auch die kultu1

A. S.-H.

�288

Sai-Halész, Brunecker und Széra

rellen und Pers6nlichkeitsunterschiede bemerkbar. Bevor wir die
einzelnen Symptome naher betrachten, geben wir hier einige typische
Protokolle wﬁrtlich wieder:
Dr. J.N., Arzt, 28 Jahre. 10. 5. 1956. 50 mg DMT i.m. P.: 78/Min., RR 130/100
Hgmm.
3! Starker Schwindel und Kribbeln im ganzen Kiirper; hauptsiichlich sind die
Lippen gefﬁhllos-eingeschlafen.
4/ «Alles ist glﬁnzender, die ganze Welt ist bedeutend heller.»
5/ «Als ob meine Stimme aus einer tieferen Kehle kﬁme. Das Zimmer ist gespensterhaft. Mir schwindelt. Ich amﬁsiere mich darﬁber, wie Ihr mich belauert.»
«Ach, wie herrlich sind die Far-hen!» Er lacht und spricht andauernd. (Zwangslachen, Logorrhoea.)
Maximal erweiterte Pupillen. RR: 160/120 Hgmm, P: 88/Min. Rhythmische
Bewegung des linken FuBes.
«Ach, neue Welle! Die Bilder kommen in solchen Mengen, daB ich gar nicht
weiB, was ich mit ihnen anfangen soll! Zuvor waren sie noch angenehm, doch
jetzt ist es schon zu viel!»
Er lacht wiederum auf. «Alles ist so komisch. Die Farben leuchten ganz fantastisch. Die Gesichter sind auch ganz anders. Warum beobachtet Ihr mich so

verdachtig ? »

10' «Ich sehe eine Farbenorgie, doch in mehreren Schichten nacheinander. Die Welt

bewegt sich immer mehr.»
11' Er schmunzelt, spricht inkohéirent, bewegt sich viel und gestikuliert lebhaft.
RR: 165/120 Hgmm. P: 88/Min. Er klagt ﬁber Dyspnoe.
12' «Ich fiihle in meinem Bauch Leere und trotzdem Fﬁlle, dorthin hat sich alles
Schlechte verzogen.»
«Hoﬂ'entlich kommt es nicht wieder.»
«Man sieht seltsame Sachen, und trotzdem ist alles schnell vorﬁber, so wie auf
der Wellenbahn.»
«Die Wand bewegt sich auch, marchenﬁlmhaft. Ich fﬁhle mich ganz so, als ob
ich geﬂogen ware.» RR: 155/120 Hgmm. P: 88/Min.
Assoziationen aufgelockert, sucht nach Ausdriicken. Keine Dyspnoe.
«Das Zimmer beginnt seine normale Form wieder zurﬁckzugewinnen! Nein,
doch nicht . . . »
Er setzt sich auf und sieht zum Fenster hinaus. «Nur wenn ich hinausschaue,
fﬁhle ich, daB ich auf der Erde bin. Mir ist, als oh wir bis jetzt geﬂogen wﬁren! »
«Ich habe das Gefﬁhl, daB dies ﬁber allem ist, ﬁber der Erde. Es ist beruhigend,
zu wissen, daB ich wieder auf der Erde bin.»
Pupillen noch maximal erweitert. RR: 145/110 Hgmm, P: 84/Min. Bewegt sich
andauernd, gestikuliert viel. Sprache ist ﬁfters inkoh'arent, kaum verfolgbar.
«Ich habe inneres Zittern, meine Gefﬁhle kann ich nicht gut ausdrﬁcken. Ich
fﬁhle mich so, als ob ich hetrunken ware.»
Er zittert. «Dieses Zittern ist gar nicht so unangenehm, es bedeutet, daB die
Reise zu Ende ist, aber alles ist noch nicht vorﬁber.»
Rhythmische Zuckungen des linken FuBes. «Jeder Anwesende hat gleichmiiBig
gelbe Zﬁhne.»

�Dimethyltryptamin: ein neues Psychoticum

289

28' «Alles hat einen ﬁberirdischen Stich und ist doch so real. Schade, daB alles in
einem geschlossenen Zimmer geschieht. Mir scheint, daB ich zusammen mit
dem Zimmer ﬂiege. Erlebnis der Reise. . .»
Pupillen miiBig erweitert. RR: 140/100 Hgmm, P: 80/Min. «J etzt habe ich schon
das Gefiihl, daB alles vorbei ist.»
Ziindet sich eine Zigarette an. Die ZigaIette sieht er grﬁBer und umfangreicher.
«Ich habe das Gefiihl, als oh ich lande. Die gehobene Stimmung léiBt nach.»
Assoziationen noch immer gelockert. Hort in der Mitte angefangener Séitze auf,
vergiBt was er sagen wollte, spricht iiber anderes.
«Alles scheint gelb zu sein, hauptsﬁchlich die Schatten. Ich weiB, daB dieser
Zustand aufhéirt, und doch. fiirchte ich mich, daB er weiterbesteht.»
«Ich bin so nervos, als ob ich ﬁebrig wire. Es ist beruhigend, daB ich dauernd
bei BewuBtsein war.»
Klagt ﬁber Miidigkeit. «Alles ist voriiber, nur meine Gedanken schwirren durcheinander.»
«Alles ist grau und farblos. Die Welt ist jetzt ganz ode.»
AuBer leichter Miidigkeit beschwerdenfrei. Assoziation schon normal. «Ich hatte
stets das Gefiihl, daB sich nur die AuBenwelt und nicht ich selhst mich verwandelte.»
Dr. Z.J., Arzt, 30 Jahre. 1. 6. 1956. 60 mg DMT i.m. P: 72/Min., RR: 110/70 Hgmm
(linkshﬁndig).
5' Er fiihlt sich ein wenig schwach. «Kollapsartiges Gefiihl.»
6' Ausgesprochenes Schwindelgefiihl.
7' RR: 130/90 Hgmm, P: 84/Min. Pupillen etwas erweitert.
8' Schwache Dyspnoe. «Das ganze ist eher angenehm.»
9' «Die Farben sind unveréindert. Mir schwindelt sehr. Leider geht es mir auch so
mit dem Alkohol: mir schwindelt, ohne daB ich mich wohl fiihle.»
10' «Ich habe einen beklemmenden Druck auf der Brust, aber es kommt mir
vor,
daB ich auch ohne Luft existieren konne.»
11’ «Das silherne Muster der rechten Wand des Zimmers ist
ganz reliefartig. Das
Beklemmungsgefiihl nimmt ab.»
12' RR: 135/80, P: 88/Min. Rechter Patellarreﬂex verstﬁrkt, rechtsseitig Babinski13'
14’
15’

16'

17'
18'
19'

Tendenz.
«Die Gesichter haben sich veréindert, sind ganz mephistoéihnlich geworden.»
«Uberall dominiert die silberne Farbe! Die Gesichter sind auch aus Silber und
teuflisch. Die silberne Farbe ist schon, nur ein wenig furchterregend.»
«Der eine Gummischlauch des Blutdruck-MeBapparates ist violett, der andere
silbern.» (In Wirklichkeit schwarz.)
«Die Gesichter sind asymmetrisch wie im Kino. Alles verandert sich im Raum,
auch die Gesichter und Gegenstéinde.»
RR 130/85 Hgmm, P: 88/Min. Reﬂexdiﬁerem der unteren Extremitiiten ist
auch weiterhin vorhanden.
«1111' schwebt alle im Raum. Bis J'etzt habe ich noch nicht die Rﬁumlichkeit der
Dinge bemerkt. Die Anschauung des Menschen veréindert sich vollkommen.»
«V01: ungefiihr einer halben Stunde konnte ich die Injektion bekommen haben.
Mir kommt es vor, als ob diese Minuten viel reicher wﬁren, deshalb erscheinen
sie mir linger.»

�Sai-Halész,Brunecker und Széra

290

20' «Mein Uhelsein verstﬁrkt sich wieder, ich fiihle mich sehr schwach. Mir ist,
als ob ich keinen Atemreﬂex hﬁtte; wenn ich nicht daran denke, wiirde ich zu
atmen vergessen. »
21’ «Alles ist statuenhaft. Die Gesichter sind teuflisch.»
22' RR: 130/80 Hgmm, P: 84/Min. Pupillen mﬁBig erweitert.
23' «Mir fallen solche Details auf, die ich bis jetzt noch nicht bemerkt babe.»
24' «Ich fiihle mich vollkommen gewichtslos, gar nicht, als ob ich 75 kg wiege.»
25' «Es ist merkwiirdig, daB mir meine Hinde vollkommen fremd sind, als ob sie
gar nicht mir gehorten.»
26' «Ich kann die Réiumlichkeit der Dinge besser beobachten; ich glaube, die
Kiinstler sehen sie immer so. Wenn es so bliebe, wﬁrde ich Maler werden.»
27' RR: 130/85 Hgmm, P: 80/Min. Rechtsseitge Babinski-Tendenz besteht weiter.
28' «Die Gegenstéinde haben gar kein Gewicht. Ich glaube, ich konnte viel grijBere
Gewichte heben als zuvor.»
29' «Die Gesichter sind noch immer statuenhaft.»
30' Er verlangt schwere Gegenstéinde und versucht, sie aufzuheben. «Die haben
alle kein Gewicht.»
331' Er hort Musik mit geschlossenen Augen und lichelt.
32' RR 125/85 Hgmm, P: 80/Min. Keine Reﬂexdiﬂ‘erenz. Pupillen mﬁBig erweitert.
33’ «Die Musik ist schon und fesselnd. Als ich diese (Abendsternarie aus Tannhéiuser) letztes Mal horte, schwebte die Musik ﬁber mir, ich war jedoch auf der
Erde. J etzt schwebe ich zusammen mit der Musik.»
34’ «Die Nebengerﬁusche storen mich sehr, schade, daB es Grammophonmusik ist.»
35' «Alles wird schon natiirlicher. Das ganze ist sehr angenehm.»
37' RR: 125/75 Hgmm, P: 76/Min. Pupillen méiBig erweitert.
40' «Ich fiihle mich schon halbwegs in Ordnung. Meine Hand gehort wieder mir.»
45' RR: 120/70 Hgmm, P: 80/Min.
50' «Ich bin ein wenig miide, sonst ist alles voriiber. Das Gewicht der Gegenstéinde
kam auch zurﬁck. Es war merkwiirdig, daB sich am Anfang Angenehmes und
Unangenehmes vermischte, in der zweiten Halfte jedoch war alles schon und
I

gut.»

Von den retrospektiven Erinnerungen ist folgende ihres
lyrischen und subjektiven Charakters halber von Interesse:
Dr. E.Ch., Arztin, 27 Jahre. 50 mg DMT i.m., 27. 8. 1956.
Teils fiirchte ich mich, teils bin ich sehr gespannt, was eigentlich auf mich
wartet. Mein SelbstbewuBtsein mochte ich gem durchwegs behalten. Was werde
ich wohl erfahren? Mit 16 Jahren hitte ich gerne Gott gesichtet — wird das jetzt
kommen? Oder wird sich eine andere Zeit meiner Vergangenheit verlebendigen?
«Guten Tag, Ihr Versuchskaninchen ist angekommen», begrﬁBte ich die zwei

jungen Minner.
«Ich messe IhIen Blutdruck, dann gehen wir ins andere Zimmer hiniiber.
Der Blutdruck 120/90. Sie fﬁrchtet sich gar nicht», sagt der eine. Ich fiihle einen
Stich, jetzt gibt es schon kein Zurﬁck mehr. «Sehen Sie sich gut im Zimmer um»,
hore ich, «sehen Sie auch aus dem Fenster.» Fliichtig schaue ich auf den Schreibtisch, die Stiihle und die monotone Wand. Alles ist kahl. Ich schaue durch das
eisenvergitterte Fenster und sehe die groBen alten Baume. Ich sehe den déimmerigen
Himmel, und auf einmal ﬁng es an...

�Dimethyltryptamin: ein neues Psychoticum

291

Mir schwindelt entsetzlich, es trommelt in meinen Obren, mit meiner rechten
Hand greife ich zum Hals, da ich dort einen ziehenden Schmerz fiihle. Mir schwindelt. — In diesem Augenblick bedauere ich, mich in dieses Experiment eingelassen
zu haben. Ich sehe auf meine Uhr, es sind noch kaum einige Minuten vergangen.
GroBer Gott, wann wird dieser Versuch ein Ende nehmen?
Der Kopf des einen Kollegen zieht sich in die Lange, er bekommt Schlitzaugen. Das Gesicht des anderen wird ﬂacher und vierkantiger. Dieses eigenartige
Licht, als ob der Schein einer Quarzlampe dammere. Meine Hand ist ganz zyanotisch.
Ist sie wirklich so ? Ich ho're Sausen. Ich bin irgendwohin unterwegs, aber wohin?
«Blutdruck 160», hﬁre ich, «Puls 100.»
Das ist jetzt der Tod. Wie einfach alles ist.
Das Sausen hat aufgehort, ich bin angekommen. Vor mir zwei stille, sonnenbeschienene Gﬁtzen. Freundlich nickend beobachten sie mich. Ich glaube, sie begriiBen mich in dieser neuen Welt. Es herrscht dumpfe Stille, wie in der Wﬁste.
Ich wage nicht, sie anzusprechen. Das ist doch Agypten, diese die Siihne der Sonne,
und ich bin endlich zu Hause. Zu Hause in jener wirklichen und schonen Welt,
wo binter den zwei Gotzen sich heitere Menschen zwischen den hohen, gelben
Sﬁulen und Statuen bewegen. Wie vornehm und einfach sie sind. Ihre sonnengebraunten Gesichter sind verklart, ihre Bewegungen frei und grazios. Weiter drinnen singen die Priester mit brausenden Stimmen. Der eine Gotze — nur seine Augen

leben

spricht mich an:
«Geht es Ihnen besser?»
«Es wird mir sehr gefallen, wenn das Ubelsein, welches der hohe Blutdruck
verursacht, aufhiirt», antworte ich.
Ich sehe mir meine Hand an, ein von mir ganz unabhéingiges, selbstandiges
Wesen und dazu sehr schon. Die Form ist so wie zuvor, doch als ob sie mit einem
goldbraunen Staub gepudert ware. Und die N age] sind rosa Muscheln.
«SchlieBen Sie die Augen. Was sehen Sie ?» Ich gehorche.
Aus der Dunkelheit sehe ich durch schwarze Eisengitter in den hellen Tempe].
Griiner Ranch qualmt darin und der Gong tont. China! Ich kann meine Augen
nicht geschlossen halten, da mir schwindelt. J etzt zeigt man mir die RorschachTafeln. Ich kann mich so schwer darauf konzentrieren, es ist so langweilig. Jetzt
erheben sich die hellen, metallschimmernden Wande, dann sinken sie wieder nieder.
Es ist, als 0b das Zimmer atme. Auf der ganzen Flache kreisen vielfarbige — gelbe,
hellgriine, rosa und blaue — Fischschuppen. Die glanzende Kugel der Lampe beugt
sich kreisend naher. Ich sehe wiederum das Gitter, doch ist jetzt dahinter kein
Ranch, sondern nur glatte runde grﬁne Steine.
Auf meinem linken FuB kriecht etwas, doch sehe ich dort gar nichts. Alles
bewegt sich und wogt. Im F ensterglas kreisen farbige Kranze und Fackeln mit ungeheurer Schnelligkeit. Ich mochte gerne erklaren, was ich sehe, doch .. .
An den Wanden sehe ich das zischende, weiBgekronte, wogende Meer. Einige
Wellen erreichen mit gedﬁmpftem Brausen den Strand.
—

«Debussy» — sage ich.
Ich bin ein ganz kleiner Punkt, wie eine Bliite auf dem Wasser von den
Wellen geschaukelt. Doch ich weiB, daB mir kein Leid geschehen kann. «Pupillen
sind verengt, Blutdruck sinkt», bore ich.
J etzt ist es schon still, die Schuppen kreisen immer langsamer, endlich bleiben
sie stehen und verschwinden. Nur die seltsame Beleuchtung wéihrt fort. Das WeiB

�292

Sai-Halasz, Brunecker und Szara

ist noch auffallend weiB, alle Linien scharfe schwarze Konturen. Die Dimensionen
sind sonderbar. Die ganze Welt ist furchterregend realistisch. Das ist die wahre
Farbe und Form der Dinge. Geféihrliches Spiel, es ware so leicht, nicht zurﬁckzukehren. Ich bin mir dunkel bewuBt, daB ich Arzt bin, das ist aber gar nicht
wichtig; Familienbeziehungen, Studien, Plane und Erinnerungen sind von mir sehr
weit entfernt. Nur diese wirkliche Welt ist wichtig, ich bin frei und ganz allein.
Zuriick, zuriick, drange ich mich. Ich muB den Weg zur realen Welt zuriickﬁnden.
Auf dem Weg nach Hause treﬂ'e ich einen Bekannten im Bus. Ich beginne
mjt ihm zu plaudern, damit ich die Realitéit der Beziehungen zu spiiren bekomme.
Die am Wege stehenden Baume erscheinen grau und verblichen. Das Leben ist
stumpf, unfreundlich und gleichgﬁltig.
Ich bin ein anderer Mensch geworden, erfahrener und freier. J etzt verstehe
ich schon viel mehr.

Wenn wir die einzelnen Symptome der DMT-Psychose betreﬂ's
Hauﬁgkeit untersuchen, finden Wir folgendes:
1. Vegetative Symptome wurden in allen 30 Fallen beobachtet.
Das bestandigste Symptom war die Steigerung des Blutdruckes, die
im allgemeinen 20—40 Quecksilber-mm erreichte, manohmal sogar
noch mehr. Die hochste von uns beobacbtete Blutdruckerhohung
betrug 70 mm, in einem Falle, wo der systolische Druck vor dem
Versuch 140 mm zeigte und sich wéihrend des Experimentes bis auf
210 mm steigerte. Der diastolische Druck erhohte sich regelméiBig,
doch in kleinerem MaBe als der systolische (meistens 10—20 mm, in
einem Falle sogar 40 mm).
Fast regelmaBig war die Pupillenerweiterung. Die Mydriase
schien parallel mit den farbigen Halluzinationen zu erscheinen. Ob
jedoch zwischen diesen ein kausaler Zusammenhang bestand, ist
kaum wahrscheinlich. Eine Pulsbeschleunigung geringeren MaBes
war auch in fast allen Fallen festzustellen.
Objektive Atmungsstorungen fanden wir nicht, doch wurden
von 23 Versuchspersonen (76 0/0) ﬁber Atemnot berichtet; diese
wurde von einem Oppressionsgefiihl des Herzens begleitet. Dieses
klinische Bild erinnert stark an das durch Serotonin hervorgerufene;
es konnte vermutet werden, daB die molekuliire Ahnlichkeit der
zwei Substanzen diese Erscheinung erkléirt: DMT verursacht auch
wie Serotonin einen Krampf der pulmonalen Arteriolen. Die sympathicomjmetische Wirkung des DMT unterstiitzt diese Vermutung.
Zur volligen Klarung dieses Mechanismus miiBten natiirlioh weitere
Tierexperimente durchgefiihrt werden.
Die sympathicomimetische Wirkung des DMT konnte nicht an
allen Organen nachgewiesen werden. So fanden wir z.B. keine be-

�Dimethyltryptamin: ein neues Psychoticum

293

deutende Hyperglykéimie und Tachypnoe. Die ganze vegetative Wirkung des DMT iihnelt mehr derjenigen des Serotonins als der des
Adrenalins.
2. Sinnestiiuschungen wurden in 27 F ﬁllen (90%) beobaohtet.
Diese waren in der Mehrheit optischen Charakters: helleuchtende,
farbige Illusionen und Halluzinationen, die sich stets im schnellen
Wechsel befanden. Bei geschlossenen Augen vermehrten sich die
Halluzinationen und nahmen szenenhaften Charakter an. Eine
unserer Versuchspersonen erzéihlte mit geschlossenen Augen:
«Ich sehe F elsen, Téiler, méirchenhafte Gegenden, mit kaum
einem Schein von Rot als belebende Farbe. Watteau-artige Bilder,
dort sind jedoch die Gestalten griiBer. Diejenigen, die ich sehe, sind
ganz winzig und verlieren sich in den Felsenrissen, kleine Anhiinger
der furchterregenden Umgebung.» Oder spéiter: «Orthodox-griechische Einsiedler, die in F elsen gehauenen dunklen Hﬁhlen leben. An
den Wéinden leuchten Ikone. Man spiirt, daB ihr ganzes Leben auf
diese Heiligenbilder zentriert ist.»
AuBer den optischen fanden wir auch — wenn auch seltener —
akustische und haptische Halluzinationen ﬂiichtigen Charakters, die
ebenso plﬁtzlich verschwanden, wie sie erschienen.
3. Stb'rungen der Raumwahrnehmung wurden in 22 Féillen (73 %)
beobachtet. Die Dimensionen des Zimmers ﬁnderten sich am auffallendsten. Nahes und F ernes verschmolz ineinander. Die Form des
Zimmers wurde ganz neu: oval oder vielkantig. Es konnte festgestellt werden, daB sich eben jene Dimensionen ﬁnderten, auf
welche die Aufmerksamkeit gerichtet wurde. Wie auch in Meskalinund LSD-25-Psychose veréinderte stets jene Mauer die Lage, die
eben angeschaut wurde. In einigen Fallen, in denen die Versuchspsychose Starker ausgeprﬁgt war, gingen die Raumdimensionen vallig
verloren. Es stellte sich dann immer ein subjektives Erleichterungsgefiihl ein, sobald die richtige Riumlichkeit der Dinge wieder wahrnehmbar wurde.
4. Stb‘rungen des Kb'rperschemas erschienen fast immer gleichzeitig mit denen des Raumes. Es handelte sich um Symptome, die
an den parietalen Symptomenkomplex erinnerten: die Versuchsperson bemerkte z.B., daB ihre Hand schon nicht ihr gehiire; oder
wenn auch die GewiBheit bestand, daB es doch ihre eigene Hand
sei, hatte diese doch etwas Selbstéindiges und Seltsames an sich.
0ft waren die St6rungen des Kérperschemas halbseitig; in 4 F ﬁllen
dehnte sich die St6rung auf die ganze linke Kiirperhﬁlfte aus.

�294

Sai-Halész, Brunecker und Széra
5. Zeitstc'irung war in geringerem MaBe in allen Fallen vorhan-

den, erreichte aber nie eine grijﬂere Intensitéit. Solche Erscheinun— wie beim Meskalin-Versuch berichtet —
daB
Zeitsinn
der
ganz
gen,
verlorengegangen ware, haben wir nicht bemerkt. Die Dauer des
Versuches wurde immer etwas ﬁberschﬁtzt. Eine Versuchsperson
fiihrte das «auf die reichere Fiille der Minuten» zuriick.
6. Denkstb'rung. In 21 Fallen (70 0/0) fanden Wir eine ausgesprochene Auflockerung der Assoziationen. Die Sprache wurde inkohéirent, angefangene Siitze konnten nicht beendigt werden, da schon
der néichste Gedanke im Vordergrund stand. Diese Inkohéirenz verursachte auch beim Protokollfiihren Schwierigkeiten. 0ft schwiegen
die Versuchspersonen fiir einige Minuten, antworteten auch nicht
auf Fragen; sie erkléirten spéiter, daB sie ihre Gedanken nicht genug
beherrschen konnten, um etWas Verstéindiges zu antworten.
In 5 Fallen hatten wir es mit paranoiden bzw. wahnéihnlichen
Gedanken zu tun. Diese Versuchspersonen berichteten erst 1—2 Tage
spater, daB sie wéihrend des Versuches ﬁberzeugt waren, man wolle
sie tﬁten bzw. vergiften. DMT war das Gift, die Versuchsleiter die
Mﬁrder. Eine Versuchsperson wurde Wéihrend des Experimentes
sehr unruhig und muBte mit Gewalt niedergehalten werden. Sie erkléirte am néichsten Tage folgendes: «Ich fiihlte, daB ich vergiftet
wurde und sterben werde und schon nichts dagegen tun konnte.
Trotzdem kéimpfte ich einen seelischen Kampf, ob ich bis zum letzten Moment am Leben hé’mgen Oder ruhig sterben soll; das letztere
war sehr verlockend, da ich mich sehr wohl fiihlte. Dieser seelische
Kampf éiuBerte sich in meinem Motorium als Unruhe; ich spiirte
und wuBte alles.»
In anderen Fillen waren die Beziehungsideen nicht so ausgeprﬁgt, doch berichteten die Versuchspersonen nach einigen Tagen,
daB sie betreﬁ's der Aufrichtigkeit und Zuverléissigkeit der Versuchsleiter ein wenig unsicher waren. Am nichsten Tage war dieses Gefiihl mit den eventuellen aggressiven Einstellungen zusammen verschwunden.
7. Aﬁ'ektive Verdnderungen. Euphorie ist eine verhﬁltnismﬁﬁig
0ft zu beobachtende Erscheinung der DMT-Psychose. In 8 Féillen
(27 0/0) war sie stark ausgeprﬁgt, in 12 Fallen (40%) milderen Grades
Oder nur auf kiirzere Zeit bemerkbar. 0ft trat sie zusammen mit
Zwangslachen auf, in anderen Féiﬂen war sie mit Introversion verbunden; letztere wurde durch ein «verkléirtes» Lﬁcheln begleitet,
das manchmal fast wéihrend dem ganzen Versuche dauerte. Die

�Dimethyltryptamin: ein neues Psychoticum

295

Versuchsperson lag mehrere Minuten lang wortlos mit geschlossenen
Augen und léichelte; manchmal jedoch weinte sie vor Seligkeit und
seufzte: «Oh, wie wunderbar ist doch alles!»
Wie schon bemerkt, ist die Angst eine der héiuﬁgsten Erscheinungen der DMT-Psychose. Am stéirksten ist sie einige Minuten nach
Verabreichung der Injektion bemerkbar, wenn sich die Umwelt so
plﬁtzlich und intensiv veréindert, daB die Versuchsperson die feste
Umgebung verliert. Nur 4 Personen berichteten, keine Angst gehabt
zu haben. In der zweiten Héilfte der Psychose tritt Angst Viel seltener auf. Nur eine Versuchsperson klagte wﬁhrend des ganzen
Versuches iiber Angst und sagte: «DaB es nur nicht zuriickkomme ! »
Was nicht zurﬁckkommen sol], konnte sie nicht erkléiren; sie antwortete: «Na ja, das Ganze!»
8. Bewuﬁtseinstb’rungen. Nur in 7 Fallen (23 0/0) haben wir eine
BewuBtseinstriibung beobachtet. Sie war stets am Anfang des Experimentes bemerkhar, d.h. 8—15 Minuten nach Verabreichung der
Injektion und dauerte nicht léinger als 2—5 Minuten. Wéihrend dieser
Periode sprechen die Versuchspersonen nichts, und auch spéiter
bestand eine Amnesie der Ereignisse, die inzwischen geschahen. Es
blieb ihnen nur das Gefiihl, daB etwas Schreckliches vorging.
9. Neurologische Verc‘inderungen. Die Reﬂexe waren wéihrend
des Versuches 0ft (63 %) erhtiht oder lebhaft. Voriibergehende pathologische Reﬂexe (Babinski usw.) fanden wir nur in 3 Fallen (10%).
Im Motorium zeigten sich ausgepréigte Veréinderungen. Fast
alle Versuchspersonen hatten eine hyperkynetische Zeitspanne, in
der sich unwillkiirlich-extrapyramidale und Willkiirliche Bewegungen mischten. Nur einmal war die Hyperkynesie so stark, daB Gewalt angewandt werden muBte, um einen Unfall zu verhiiten.
Sensibilitéitsstﬁrungen gesellten sich oft zur Stﬁrung des K6rperschemas. Meistens waren die Fehlleistungen seitens der Tiefensensibilitéit, Gewichtsschﬁtzung, Kﬁrperlage usw. zu beobachten.
Die Oberﬂﬁchensensibilitéit war relativ viel besser erhalten. Sensibilitéitsstﬁrungen fanden wir in 18 Féillen (6000).
10. Halbseitigkeit der Symptome. Eine der interessantesten Beobachtungen beziiglich der DMT-Psychosen war, daB in Mehrzahl
der F ﬁlle die Symptome halbseitig ausgepréigter waren. Dies war
ebenso bei den neurologischen Symptomen wie bei den Halluzinationen und Kﬁrperschemastﬁrungen bemerkbar. Die linke Seite
war stets die stéirker betroﬂene. Wir hatten Gelegenheit, 3 Linkshéindige unserem Experiment zu unterziehen; bei diesen dominierten

�Sai-Halész, Brunecker und Széra
___—____—_——_—————————————-—-———~
296

Abb.

100 %

1

80%

40%
20%

s-aaa°a°-Eaa°a:a°§-Eé°-EE
g
be
:1
:5

a;
s:
&gt;.,

a
"-4
0
'8

A:

H

m

"‘

{-11

o

I:

cu
3'3

E,”

H

o9-1

&gt;5

no
3::

g:

.H

.0

gcu

8
0
.=:
:2
53

Q
'8

au

:5

uo
.5.”
0

aa

o
0
m

C121

:o

‘53

a:3
(I)

1

:1
'-'
:5

an
....

f:O
m

ﬂw

m

a

a)”

‘

M

o

CIT-I

o

a:
‘9

'8

w

""

ho”

s

2":
cc

94

aH

:o
2;

4.:

'-'

ﬂ

tan
5::

5
4::
0
m

F
‘3

w

Q

5

E75

b;

&lt;‘.

:1

H

:o

E
E

:1

«a

p:

'5cs

o
:1

g
3

g

....

&lt;

g

v-c

an
E

o
A4
v
“-1

=

4

Q.

m

:1

I-

:o

gm

4-»

' 53
rd

a
a

E

:3

.ao

_.
g
m
o
"=1

°

[—1

an

g
g
c:
""
‘9

*8
6)

u
m

g

cc

a

5.0

c:

.2

s

m

die Symptome rechtsseitig. (Auf diese Erscheinung kommen wir in
der Besprechung noch zuriick.)
11. Nachwirkungen. Alle Versuchspersonen klagten am Experiment folgenden Tage iiber Miidigkeit. Diese dauerte manchma] nur
einige Stunden, bei einigen jedoch 1—2 Tage. Wéihrend dieser Periode
2
Nach
ein
7
Tagen
depressiv.
%)
(23
wenig
Versuchspersonen
waren
Die
in
betreﬂ's
alle
30
Ordnung.
Personen
vﬁllig
Stimmung
waren
1
der
in
wir
Abbildung
einzelnen
der
gehen
Symptome
Hﬁuﬁgkeit
wieder.
Besprechung
Durch die DMT-Versuche ergeben sich 3 Tatsachen, die fiir das
weitere Verstéindnis der sogenannten Modell-Psychosen éiuBerst

interessant sind:

und kurze Dauer der DMT-Psychose.
2. Halbseitigkeit gewisser Symptome.
3. Nahe chemische Verwandtschaft zwischen DMT und
Serotonin.
1. Pliitzlicher Anfang

�297

Dimethyltryptamin: ein neues Psychoticum

Wirkung des DMT ist etwas ganz Neues unter
der Psychotica. Meskalin fingt nach fast einer Stunde zu wirken an,
Haschisch und LSD-25 wirkt noch langsamer. Aber auch die Dauer
der Psychose ist beim DMT auffallend kurz, und zwar 40~60 Minuten. Um diesem Problem nﬁherzukommen, haben wir — wie
schon berichtet - die Ausscheidung von DMT und 3-Indolessigséiure
wéihrend und nach dem Versuch untersucht. Wir fanden, daB nach
Verabreichung von DMT die Quantitéit der 3-Indolessigséiure im
Harn stark zunjmmt und in den ersten 6 Stunden schon ungeféihr
das Zehnfache der normalen Ausscheidung erreicht; ebenso erhﬁht
sich — jedoch nur in geringerem MaBe — die Ausscheidung der
5-hydroxy-3-Indolessigséiure, was auf einen Zusammenhang mit dem
Serotonin-Stoffwechsel hinweist. Im Harn fanden wir jedoch kein
unveréindertes DMT, was bezeugt, daB das DMT im Korper sehr
schnell und vollig abgebaut wird. Dies kann uns erkléiren, warum
die Wirkung so schnell abléiuft und auch das DMT peroral unwirksam ist: wahrscheinlich wird es in der Leber abgebaut, bevor es die
psychische Wirkung ausiiben konnte. Es bleibt aber noch immer die
Frage oﬂ'en, warum das DMT so schnell wirken kann. Nach der
Theorie von Rothlin und Patzig veréindert sich das Meskalin und
LSD-25 im Organismus, bevor es eine Wirkung ausiiben konnte; es
wéire eigentlich ein Umbauprodukt dieser Substanzen, das die psychotische Wirkung habe. Beim DMT kann kaum von so einer Transformation die Bede sein; das plotzliche Auftreten der Symptome
unterstiitzt die Vermutung, daB das DMT selbst die psychotische
Wirkung ausiibt. DMT wéire demgemﬁB das erste Psychotikum
auBer Bufotenin — das selbst ohne Abbau oder Umbau die experimentelle Psychose verursacht.
2. Die Halbseitigkeit einiger Symptome ist eine der interessantesten Erscheinungen der DMT-Psychose. Es treten gleich zwei
Fragen auf:
a) wie ist es moglich, daB eine chemische Substanz auf eine
Hemisphﬁre stéirkere Wirkung ausiibt als auf die andere, und warum
stets auf die nichtdominante Hemisphéire ?
b) hat die nichtdominante Hemisphéire eine wichtige Rolle im
Auftreten der experimentellen Psychose oder wenigstens einiger
Symptome ?
Diese Fragen kann man heute noch kaum beantworten. Es wﬁre
zu oberﬂéichlich, sich auf die erste Frage mit der Antwort zu begniigen, daB die nichtdominante Hemisphéire chemischen Intoxi1. Die rasche

-—

Psychiat. New-0]., Basel. Vol. 135, No.

4—5

(1958)

20

�298

Sai-Halész, Brunecker und Széra

kationen gegeniiber mehr «verwundbar» wire; dies sollte sich doch
dann auch bei anderen Vergiftungen zeigen. Oder aber ist der Kreislauf der dominanten Hemisphéire im Notfall zu besserer Regulation

fﬁhig ?

Die zweite Frage, 0b néimlich die rechte Hemisphﬁre im Auf—
treten psychopathologischer Syndrome eine wichtige Rolle habe,
wurde schon in anderen Zusammenhéingen beriicksichtigt. Hoﬁ und
Pﬁtzl fanden, daB das Zeitraﬁ'er-Phéinomen nur bei rechtsseitiger
Lﬁsion zu beobachten war and meistens bei parieto-okzipitalen
Schﬁdigungen. In der DMT-Psychose zeigt sich ein groBer Tei] der
Erscheinungen eben als parieto-okzipitale F unktionsstﬁrungen (visuale Halluzinationen, Kﬁrperschemastﬁrungen, Raumwahrnehmungs-Stﬁrungen usw.). Es scheint, daB die Halbseitigkeit bei der
DMT-Psychose uns einen weiteren Beweis bietet, die Theorie von
Hoﬂ und Pb’tzl zu unterstiitzen: eine rechtsseitige Gehjrnschéidigung
iibt eine «bahnende» Wirkung beim Auftreten gewisser psychopathologischer Phﬁnomene ans.
3. In den letzten J ahren héiufen sich die Publikationen, die eine
zentrale Rolle des Serotonins in der Funktion des zentralen Nervensystems annehmen (Brodie et al.). Es wurde auch angenommen
(Woolley), daB der Serotonin-Stoffwechsel in der Genese der Psychosen, hauptséichlich der Schizophrenic, einen wichtigen Anteil
habe. Wie schon erwéihnt, fanden wir im Harn der Versuchspersonne
ungeféihr 4—5mal mehr 5-hydroxy-3-Indolessigséiure als bei Normalen; diese Substanz ist, wie bekannt, das Hauptabbauprodukt
des Serotonins. Es gibt wiederum zwei Mﬁglichkeiten: entweder wird
die 3-Indolessigséiure, also das Abbauprodukt des DMT, sekundﬁr
oxydiert, oder aber mobilisiert das verabreichte DMT eine bedeutende Menge des gebundenen Serotonins. Im letzteren Falle ware
die experimentelle DMT-Psychose im strengsten Zusammenhang mit
dem Serotonin-Stoﬂ'wechsel verbunden. Hier k6nnte man nach gewissen Analogien einen in den zentralen Synapsen abspielenden
kompetitiven Antagonismus der zwei Aminen vorstellen. Es miissen
noch weitere mit radioaktiven Isotopen gezeichnete DMT-Experimente vorgenommen werden, um diese Fragen zu lﬁsen und auch
damit einen Wichtigen Schritt zum biochemischen Verstéindnis der
psychotischen Zustéinde im allgemeinen zu tun.
Durch unsere ohigen Beobachtungen kﬁnnen wir auch feststellen, daB auBer dem Bufotenin das DMT auch eine bedeutende R0116
in der Gesamtwirkung der Piptadenia-Extrakte zu spielen habe.

�M“—
Dimenthyltryptamin: ein neues Psychoticum

299

Insofern unsere Ergebnisse mit den spﬁrlichen an Menschen
gewonnenen Bufotenin-Beobachtungen zu vergleichen sind (diese
sind wegen der intravenosen Anwendung des Bufotenins kaum moglich), ist es auffallend, daB das DMT eine periphere-vaskulﬁre, serotoninartige Wirkung in geringerem MaBe als das Bufotenin ausiibt.
Dies kann vielleicht der strukturelle Unterschied, d. h. die beim
Bufotenin vorhandene 5-OH-Wurzel erkléiren. Diese und die iibrigen
Detailfragen konnten bloB weitere, an denselben Personen und unter
gleicher Anwendung der 2 Indolamine durchgefiihrte Versuche kliiren.
Z usammenfassung

Dimethyltryptamin wurde synthetisiert, und dessen psychotische Wirkung untersucht. Nach intramuskuléirer Verabreichung
von 0,7—1mg/kg Dimethyltryptamin tritt schon nach 3~5 Minuten
ein psychotischer Zustand auf, der in vielen Erscheinungen denen
ahnelt, die durch Meskalin und LSD-25 verursacht wurden. Die
Dimethyltryptamjn-Psychose lauft innerhalb einer Stunde ab. AuBer
der Beschreibung der Symptome werden 3 Probleme nﬁher untersucht:
1. Was kann die Ursache des plotzlichen Auftretens und schnellen Ablaufes der Dimethyltryptamin-Psychose sein.
2. Welche Rolle spielt die Halbseitigkeit der Symptome, also
die stiirkere Schiidigung der rechten nichtdominanten Hemisphéire beim Auftreten der psychopathologischen Erscheinungen.
3. Welche F olgerungen konnen beziiglich der Bedeutung des
Serotonin-Stoﬂ'wechsels im zentralen Nervensystem betreﬂ's
der nahen cliemischen Verwandtschaft zwischen Dimethyltryptamin und Serotonin gezogen werden.
Die Ahnlichkeiten und Unterschiede zwischen den Bufoteninund Dimethyltryptamin-Psychosen sollen weitere Experimente klarstellen.

Re’sumé

On a synthétisé la diméthyltryptamine et étudié son action

psychotique.
Aprés une administration intra-musculaire de 0,7—1 mg/kg de
djméthyltryptamine, un état psychotique est apparu aprés 3 a 5
minutes déja. Il ressemhlait par beaucoup d’aspects a ceux qui sont

�300

Sai-Halasz, Brunecker und Széra

provoqués par la mescaline et le LSD 25. La psychose a la diméthyltryptamine dure une heure. A part la description des symptﬁmes on
a étudié de plus pres 3 problémes:
1. Quelle peut étre la raison du début brusque et de la ﬁn rapide
de la psychose a la diméthyltryptamine.
2. Quel role joue la latéralisation des symptémes ainsi que
l’atteinte prépondérante de l’hémisphére droit, non dominant, lors
de l’apparition des symptomes psychopathologiques.
3. Quelles conclusions on peut tirer de la proche parenté
chimique entre la diméthyltryptamine et la sérotonine pour la
signiﬁcation du métabolisme de la sérotonine dans le systeme
nerveux central.
D’autres expériences montreront les ressemblances et diﬂ'érences entre les psychoses a la Bufotenine et a la diméthyltryptamine.
Summary
Dimethyltryptamin was synthesized and its eﬁ'ect on psychosis
investigated. An intramuscular injection of 0.7—1 mg/kg Dimethyl3—5 minutes a psychotic condition
after
and
was
given
tryptamin
was induced which in many respects resembled those phenomena
induced by mescalin and LSD 25. This Dimethyltryptamin psychosis
lasted less than an hour. Besides a description of the symptoms we
have investigated three problems:
1. The reason for the swift start and rapid departure of the
psychosis.
2. What is the signiﬁcance of the one-sided nature of the
in
of
the
disturbance
the
right
degree
is,
that
greater
symptoms,
non-dominant hemisphere when the psychopathological phenomena
begin to show.
3. Having regard to the close chemical afﬁnity between Dimethyltryptamin and Serotonin, what conclusions could be drawn
as to the import of serotonin metabolism in the C.N.S. Further
experiments should clarify the similarities and differences between
psychoses induced by Bufotenin and those by Dimethyltryptamin.
LITERATUR
Beringer, K.: Der Meskalim'ausch, Springer, Berlin 1927. — Brodie, B. B. et al.:
Science 122, 968, 1955. — Erspamer, V.: Pharmacol. Rev. 6, 425, 1954. — Evarts,
E. V.: Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 75., 49, 1956. — Fabing, H.D.: Amer. J. Psychiat.
113, 409, 1956. — Fabing, H.D. and Hawkins: Science 123, 886, 1956. — Fish, M. S.,

�m
Dimethyltryptamin: ein neues Psychoticum

301.

N. M. Johnson and D. C. Homing: J. amer. chem. Soc. p. 77, 1955. — Fraenkel, F.
und E. Joel: Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat. 111, 84, 1927. — Hoﬁ, H. und 0. Po'tzl:
Z. Neurol. 151, 599, 1934. — Page, I.H.: Physiol. Rev. 34, 563, 1954. —
RaymondHamet: Compt. rend. Soc. biol. 135, 1414, 1941. — Rothlin, E.: Experientia 12, 154,
1956. — Speeter, M.E. and W. C. Anthony: J. amer. chem. Soc. 76, 6208, 1954. —
Stall, A. und A. Hoﬂmann: Helv. chim. Acta 26, 944, 1943. - Stromberg, V.L.:
J. amer. chem. Soc. 76, 1707, 1954. — Stoll, A.: Schweiz. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.
60, 1, 1947. — Szdra, SL: Experientia 12, 441, 1956. — Wieland, H. und H. Mittasch:
Ann. Chem. 513, 1, 1934. — Woolley, D. W.: Brit. med. J. 1954, 122.
Adresse der Autoren: Dr. A. Sai-Halész, Dr. G. anecker, Zentrales Neurologisch-Psychiatrisches
Institut,
Budapest-Lipétmezb‘ (Ungarn). Dr. St. Széra, 113 Hesketh Street, Chavy Chase 15, Md.
(USA).

�,

u

'1‘

�Copyright, 1958, by the Society 'for'Experimental Biology and Medicine.
Reprinted from PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE,
1958, v97, 4837486

A New Group of Psychotomimetic
L. G.

ABOOD, A.

M. OSTFELD

Agents.ale

AND

(23782)

JOHN BIEL

Divisions of Psychiatry and Preventive Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine
and Lakeside Laboratories, Milwaukee

During the past few years, much interest
has developed in psychotomimetic agents, particularly with regard to LSD 25 and mescaline. At the same time, considerable emphasis has been placed on the possible role of
adrenalin and serotonin in psychoses, particularly because they are structurally related
to the psychotomimetic agents and are pharThe, role Of
macologically antagonistic.
acetylcholine and acetylcholine- like sub'stances, on the other hand, has received relatively little attention.
Knowledge of the hallucinogenic properties
Of cholinergic blocking agents,,such. as atroh
pine and hyoscine, dates back to thetime of
the ancient Hindus. Recently, a group of
piperidyl benzilates possessing anticholinergic properties were synthesized by Biel and
associates(l) as possible antispasmodics in
the treatment Of duodenal ulcer(2). In the
course of therapeutic trials, it was found that
the tertiary amine hydrochlorides of the benzilate esters, although active anticholinergics,
produced undesirable side effects, particu-

larly hallucinations. The quaternary ammonium salts, on the other hand, were entirely devoid of such effects. We have recently, Obtained a series of such substances
and examined their psychotomimetic effects
on animals and human subjects(3).
Methods. The psychotogenic effects of the
N—methyl-3-piperidyl benzilate and related
congeners were tested on over 40 human volunteers who were either normal or patients
complaining of minor disorders. Although
some of the patients had limited knowledge of
the psychotogenic action of the drugs, the
majority of subjects were completely unaware
Of their nature.
Ceruloplasmin determinations were made on many subjects, employing
a method described previously(4). All of
the agents were tested for their behavioral effects in animals, including some 30 Siamese
ﬁghting ﬁsh, 50 rodents, and 5 cats. The action of these agents on the Siamese ﬁghting
ﬁsh is comparable to those described 'for LSD
by Abramson(5). In rodents there were
marked behavioral changes, such as initial excitement and marked' hyperactivity, spon* Supported by grants from Mental Health Fund,
taneous squealing, lack Of ”responsiveness to
State Of Illinois, and Teagle Fn.
stimuli, muscular weakness, (and lethargy.
,

_

4

_

�NEW PSYCHOTOMIMETIC AGENTS

The anticholinergic effect of the agents was
determined on isolated smooth muscle preparations and the rectus abdominus according
to the method of Chang and Gaddum(6).
Results. Experimental ﬁndings have indicated that the compounds are extremely powerful hallucinogens, in many respects more interesting than LSD and mescaline. When
administered in 5-15 mg doses, orally, to human volunteers, distinct auditory and visual
hallucinations occurred within one hour in
for
recurred
and
periodically
individual
every
periods up to 10 hours after administration of
the drug. Hallucinations were accompanied
by gross distortions of visual images and severe alterations in feeling state. A number of
subjects exhibited paranoid and megalomanic
delusions, while the affective states ranged
from a feeling of unpleasantness to extreme
terror. Some of the subjects actually carried on conversations with imaginary individuals involving situations dating back 10-20
years. The following are almost exact quotations from different subjects: “People from
India are standing outside a tent. They have
turbans and those are camels.” “I see six
people sitting around a table playing cards
. a monkey is over the table hanging by
his tail.” “I am walking down a narrow corridor and suddenly stop and cannot move
is beating
. . . a band is playing . . . a drum
3/4 rhythm.”
The subjects receiving 10 mg (orally) of
N-methyl-3-piperidyl benzilate were in complete loss of contact with the environment for
vis—
dramatic
While
hours
experiencing
many
ual and auditory hallucinations. In many respects these anticholinergic agents come
closer to simulating clinical psychoses than
do mescaline and LSD.
Thus far, a number of congeners have been
tested for both hallucinogenic properties and
anticholinergic effect on the isolated colon
(Table I). Of all the compounds tested for
hallucinogenic properties, N-methyl-3-piperidyl benzilate is the most potent, with the Nethyl derivative being somewhat less effective. The tetramethyl derivative is considerably less effective than the N—ethyl derivative. The quaternary derivative is devoid of

,

psychotogenic effects. As for the antispasmodic potency, although the 3 substances
possessing psychotogenic properties are perhaps the most potent, the remaining compounds are still quite effective.
Ceruloplasmin determinations were made
on all subjects, since this enzyme was shown
to be increased in the serum of acute schizophrenics(4,7). The method used has been
described previously(4).
Preliminary observations have indicated that as much as a
50-75% elevation in the blood ceruloplasmin
accompanies the hallucinatory episode produced by these agents. The enzyme increased
only when marked psychogenic disturbances
were apparent, returning to normal shortly
after the psychogenic effects disappeared and
while peripheral autonomic effects, such as
mydriasis, muscular weakness, and dryness of
the mouth, still persisted. A rise in ceruloplasmin has been shown to accompany
changes in affective or feeling states, regardless of the mechanism by which the effects are
produced (3 ) .
Discussion. A discussion of the relative
antispasmodic properties of this group of
compounds appears elsewhere(1). It is apparent from the present study that in this
series of compounds there is no direct relationship between the anticholinergic effect on
smooth muscle and psychotogenic potency.
The presence of the hydroxyl group in the
acid moiety to yield the diphenylacetate ester
is undoubtedly essential for hallucinogenic
effect, while only slightly enhancing the anticholinergic effect. Since both the diphenylacetate and the benzilate derivatives penetrate
the blood brain barrier, it would appear that
the hydroxyl group is an absolute require—
ment. The presence of a quaternary nitrogen
in the piperidine ring only slightly inﬂuences
the anticholinergic effect, but apparently pre—
vents the compound from penetrating the
blood—brain barrier. As a rule, quaternary
ammonium compounds are not able to enter
the central nervous system through the blood
stream. Preliminary observations have shown
that intrathecal injections of the quaternary
compound into rats produce much the same
kind of neurological and behavioral disturb-

�_,,'

_

a

\

4
l

NEW PSYCHOTOMIMETIC AGENTS

TABLE I. Structure-Activity Relationships of. Some Piperidyl Benzilate Congeners. Anticholinergic effect was determined on isolated rat colon with concentrations of about 10“ M.

\
/
Ill/Q

ox
R—O—C—C

\
\/\O
—

Relative
Relative halantilucinogenic cholinergic
potency
potency

Name

R

X

N—methyl-3-piperidy1-benzilate

m

0H

++++

++++

OH

+++

+++

OH

—

+

+++

I

\N/
CHs

N -ethyl-3-piperidyl—benzilate

\/

N
02115

1,2,2,6 tetramethyl-4-piperidyl benzilate
CH3

\N/(CHS) 2

CH3

N-ethyl-3-piperidyl-diphenylacetate

\/

H

0

+++

OH

0

+++

N

02H5

m
\/
/\

N-dimethyl—3-piperidyl benzilate

N+

CH3

ances observed with the tertiary benzilates.
At present, numerous other congeners are
being examined for their hallucinogenic properties. Future synthetic work is contemplated in an effort to explore other structureactivity relationships from the point of view
of hallucinogenic effect. In view of the work
of others on anticholinergic substances, it
may be predicted that the distance between
the hydroxyl group and the piperidyl nitrogen
is critical( 8,9). Introduction of alkyl groups
into the molecule would, therefore, presumably diminish the anticholinergic potency, and
it will be of interest to determine the relationship of such a change to hallucinogenic
effectiveness.
Summary. A series of synthetic anticholin-

C'H3

ergic agents have been shown to possess potent psychotomimetic properties. Chemically,
the agents are esters of piperidine and benzilic acid. Among the effects produced are
megalomanic and paranoid delusions, visual
and auditory hallucinations, and a partial loss
of contact with the environment. A number of
congeners of the compounds have been examined with regard to structure-activity relationships.
J. H., Sprengler, E. P., Leiser, H. A., Horner, 1., Drukker, A., Friedman, H. L., J. Am. Chem.
1. Biel,

Soc., 1955, v77, 2250.

2. Ewing, P. L., Seager, L. D., Keller, G., Dodson,

D.,

J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap.,

1954, v110, l7.

3. Ostfeld, A. M., Abood, L. G., Marcus, D. A.,

�NEW PSYCHOIOMIME’TIC AGENTS
Arch. Neurol. Psych. in press.
4. Abood, L. G, Gibbs, F. A, Gibbs,E ., ibid.,
1957, v77, 643.
5. Abramson, H. A., Evans, L. T., Science. 1954.
V120: 9906. Chang,

v79, 255.

H. C., Gaddum, J. H., J. Physiol., 1933,
.

t

'

'

7‘Akerfeldt,
M., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap.,
Lands,
8.

S., Science, 1957, v125, 117.

A.

1951,

v102, 219.
9. Goodman, L., Gilman, A., The Pharmacological
Basis of Therapeutics, ed. Macmillan Co., N. Y., 1955.

Received December 23, 1957. P.S.E.B.M., 1958, v97.

DEPARTMENT OF
EXPERIMENTAL

rsvcumm

HlLLSlDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS. N. v.
MAY1

4'53

'-

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of Neurology (5“ Psychiatry
March 1958, Vol. 79, pp. 317-322
Copyright 1958, by American Medical Association

Studies with Ceruloplasmin and a New Hallucinogen
ADRIAN M. OS'I'FELD, M.D.; LEO G. ABOOD, Ph.D.,

and

Knowledge of the hallucinogenic prop—erties of atropine—like compounds is cer—
tainly as old as that concerning the effects
of mescal and marihuana. It has been pos—
tulated that the oracle at Delphi induced her
prophetic vision with belladonna. Hughes
and Clark1 quote a lively description of a
17th century American epidemic of atro—
pine poisoning. Readers of English detec—
tive novels or American Western stories
are familiar with the deadly nightshade and
Jimson weed, respectively.
The recent synthesis of N-ethyl-3-piper—
idyl benzilate hydrochloride, JB 318*,2
an agent chemically related to atropine
(Figure), led to the present studies. Originally intended as an autonomic—blocking
agent in the treatment of peptic ulcer, the
drug exhibited hallucinogenic properties, so
prominent as to merit further investigation.3
At the close of the conference of the
Brain Research Foundation on blood tests
in mental illness in 1957,4 several unan—
swered or partly answered questions were
raised or implied. What are the serum
ceruloplasmin levels in disturbed behavior
not of psychotic proportion? Does the con—
centration of this protein vary with the severity of the mental disorder? Is its
concentration in the blood increased during
Submitted for publication Sept. 16, 1957.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Division
of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of
Medicine.
Now at the Institute for Psychosomatic and
Psychiatric Research and Training, Michael Reese
Hospital (Dr. Marcus).
This research was supported in part by the
Mental Health Fund, State of Illinois; the Brain
Research Foundation, and the Dan Crego Fund.
*The material was supplied by Drs. John Biel
and H. L. Daiell, of Lakeside Laboratories. Dr.
John Biel cooperated in the study and made helpful
suggestions.

DAVID A. MARCUS, M.D.,

Chicago

N—ETHYL—B-PIPERIDYLBENZILATE (JB 3l8)

CHz—7CH—CH2\
N—CH:

\

CHz——- CH——-CH2

/

CHzOH
l

CH—O-C
H

ATROPINE

drug—induced psychoses? And, ﬁnally, since

ceruloplasmin attacks certain pyrocatechol
(catechol) amines in vitro, what effect does
an increase in these pyrocatechol amines in
the blood have on ceruloplasmin?
The present study, then, had the dual
purpose of examining the psychotomimetic
properties of ]B 318 and assaying the effects on serum ceruloplasmin of (1) JB
318—induced “psychoses,” (2) intravenous
infusion of some pyrocatechol amines, and
'(3) naturally occurring behavior disturb—
ances of moderate severity.

Experimental Methods and Results
Studies with J B 318.—In all, 45 volunteer
nonpsychotic subjects were studied. JD 318
was administered orally to nine subjects in
doses of 10 or 15 mg. Three who took the
agent were professional persons employed
in the hospital; six were medical ward patients, selected only because their general
state of health was satisfactory. The three
317

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

professional persons had prior knowledge of anxious to repeat the experience. Seven
the effects of the drug, whereas none of experienced visual hallucinations, and four
the patients were told what to expect. Blood of these also described auditory hallucina—
was drawn for serum ceruloplasmin deter— tions, which were especially prominent in
mination before and at the peak of the three.
The visual hallucinations usually consisted
hallucinatory phase. Ceruloplasmin was
measured by the method of Abood5 in of amorphous colored forms, whereas
eight of the nine subjects.
brightly colored, elaborate images were inThe determination was done as follows: frequent. In the ﬁve cases in which animal
One-tenth milliliter of fresh serum was and human forms were reported the images
incubated with 0.1 ml. of 0.1% p-phenylene— were usually related to speciﬁc events in the
diamine and 1.0 ml. of 0.2 M tris(hydroxy— recent past experience of the subject. Most
methyl)ethanolamine buffer (pH 6.8) for hallucinations lasted only a few seconds, al—
a period of one hour at 37 C. After the though one subject reported images persist—
addition of 2 ml. of distilled water the mix- ing for many minutes. Generally, but not
ture was read at 490m“ on the spectro- always, the maximum hallucinatory effect
photometer. An optical density reading of was attained when subject was kept alone
0.100 corresponds to an activity of IOMM in a darkened, quiet room.
The auditory hallucinations consisted
of substrate (p—phenylenediamine) oxidized
of
musical
such
mainly
sounds,
stand—
0.1
as whistling,
hour
ml.
The
of
one
serum.
per
ard curve was determined by oxidizing the singing, and band playing. A few reported
substrate with puriﬁed human cerulo~ noises, such as sirens and hammering or
banging radiators. Emotional disturbances,
plasminrt
such
fear
and
as
bewilderment, seem to acReactions related to the autonomic activ—
visual
whereas
hallucinations,
the
company
the
30
of
about
minutes
ity
drug began
after oral administration and consisted of auditory experiences were not usually disthe following: dry mouth, blurred vision in turbing.
Two
be
subjects
to
appeared
paranoid
all cases, usually tachycardia, facial ﬂushing,
hallu—
the
during
or
immediately
following
and disappearance of the carotid sinus re—
ef—
While
the
cinatory
central
responses.
ﬂex. There was no appreciable effect on
fects
ofthe drug persisted, the subjects
blood pressure. Nausea occurred in two pa—
showed
reduction
of
intellectual
a
capacity,
tients, vomiting in one. The autonomic recharacterized
rela—
short
attention
by
span,
actions began 15 to 60 minutes before the
tive
and
anomia,
inaccurate
time
grossly
hallu—
and
outlasted
the
psychic phenomena
All
remained
in
judgment.
contact with
cinations by l to 24 hours. The peak auto—
the actual environment, but the presence of
nomic effects preceded the peak psychic
familiar
a
person or object was required to
effects in every case.
enhance orientation and allay apprehen—
Perceptual responses were characterized sions.
by distortion of Visual images, visual and
The following are taken essentially verauditory hallucinations, and alterations in batim from the comments of
dur—
a
patient
feeling state. All nine subjects reported dis— ing the
period of hallucinogenic effect:
tortion of visual images and an initial change
“My arms are heavy and everything feels far
in mood, characterized by apprehension and away. My head feels light. I’m
very weak. . . .”
“Lots of people are talking incoherently. I think
lethargy. The general feeling tone was re—
it’s
Spanish.”
ported as unpleasant by eight of the nine
“The room feels distant. I wish I could lift my
subjects, and none of the subjects were left
is
arm but I can’t. The
and
Dr. G. D. Cummings, of the Michigan Department of Health, supplied the puriﬁed human cerulo—
plasmin.
1'

318

room
a
narrow,
band is playing. The rhythm is M. . . .”
“The room is a long corridor, and I’m in it and
I’m 8 or 9 years old. I wonder how I’ll get out. I

Vol. 79, March, 1958

�I

CERULOPLASMIN AND NEW HALLUCINOGEN
of .18 318 on Serum
Ceruloplasmin’l‘ of Normal Volunteers
TABLE l.——Eﬂect

Before

JB

Ceruloplasmln Approximately Two Hours
After J B 318
Subjects Who
Hallucinated

318

230
242
304
224

188

230
241

2l 1

115
120
155
315
*

160
170

Subjects Who Did
Not Hallucinate
_

«——~

-

_ _

-_

.

__

-_

143

296

The values are expressed as optical density X10 8.

know I’m in bed and also in that other place. There
must be more than one of me, and one is a little
girl.”
“People from India are standing outside a tent.
They have turbans, and those are camels.”

An electroencephalogram taken on one
subject revealed no abnormality, even dur—
ing a series of vivid hallucinations.
Ceruloplasmin levels uniformly increased
in the six subjects who experienced hallucinations and decreased slightly in the two
who did not (Table 1). The parallelism of
ceruloplasmin levels in schizophrenic psy—
choses and those induced by JB 318 is
evident. There was, however, no propor—
tionality between the per cent increase in
ceruloplasmin and the severity of the psy—
choses. Nor were the ceruloplasmin levels
during the drug psychoses as high as commonly occurs in acute schizophrenics?6
Studies with Pyrocatechol Amines and
Human Subjects.—Pyrocatechol amines and
their breakdown products have been increas—
ingly implicated in schizophrenic psychoses.
Since ceruloplasmin has been shown to at—
tack epinephrine and serotonin in vitro,7 it
was deemed worth while to infuse certain
pyrocatechol amines intravenously and to
gauge their effects on behavior and serum
ceruloplasmin. There was a uniform slight
decrease in serum ceruloplasmin with each
agent, as well as with control dextrose in—
fusion.
The subjects were general medical patients who were either convalescing or not
seriously ill. None had rheumatoid arthri—
tis, liver disease, acute infections, or known
carcinoma, conditions sometimes associated
Oxtfeld at

(11.

with high cerulopla51nin.4'6 The infusions
were all administered by an unfamiliar
physician in a new setting. Apprehension
was initially evident in the behavior and
Speech of each subject. Common were such
comments as “We’re on the same side,
aren’t we, Doc. . .you won’t hurt me”; or
“lf the test comes out bad, will I have to
stay here [in the hospital] longer?”
With a single exception, the subjects
were relaxed, beginning about 15 minutes
after perfusion was started. About half
slept, and nearly all commented on how comfortable and tranquil they felt. None of the
subjects on levarterenol, serotonin, or dex—
trose reported any unusual sensation. The
subject on isoproterenol U. S. P. and the
two who received epinephrine experienced
a rapid heart rate but no emotional disturb—
ances. One subject who received epinephrine grimaced, tossed about, and was
agitated during the infusion.
Since the effects of the infusion on ceruloplasmin were identical regardless of the
agent administered, the parallel decline in
anxiety and in ceruloplasmin attracted our
attention. It was postulated that if there
were a parallelism between feeling state
and ceruloplasmin, then both would be ex—
pected to undergo an increase during peri—
ods of disturbed behavior.
2.—E[fect of Various Agents“ onSerum
Creruloplasmin of Normal Human Subjects

TABLE

Agent
Levarterenol

Epinephrine

Dosage
10 jug/min.
10 jig/min.
20 jig/min.
5 pg/min.
10 ug/min.
10 ug/min.
15

Isoproterenol
Serotonin
Iproniazid
5% dextrose
with water

jig/min.
pg/min.
ng/min.

15
15
5 ug/m‘m.

mg/min.
mg/ min.
100 mg. orally

0.25
0.50

Ceruloplasmin
Control
186
213
292
228
350
144
235
220
188
211
222
196

During Drug
Eﬂect
140

232
225
191

347
102
205
200
214
189
224

1'

177

230

225

240
278
182

228
236
160

187
170

__-

141
150

TThis subject alone was markedly agitated during the infusion. N onpsychotic at present, he had been previously hospitalized six times for acute schizophrenic episodes.
319

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

Ccruloplasmin* of Disturbed
and Tranquil Subjects Who Were Not
Psychotic

TABLE 3.——Serum

Disturbed

Tranquil

262
250
220
222

136
157

154
272
240

lVlean
*

S. l).

348
230
282
410
263

202
170

181
118
186
156

230
170
120
166

The values are expressed in terms of optical density X10 5.

This thesis was tested in 26 consecutively
referred clinic patients. Previously, one pa—
tient who could not speak English and
three whose psychological states were not
clearly discernible to the observer were not
included, leaving a group of 22 patients.
Each subject was interviewed in order to
determine his general psychological state.
Eleven exhibited disturbed behavior, such
as weeping, pacing the ﬂoor, sweating, and
tachycardia and/0r admitted to prominent
feelings of anxiety and depression. An
equal number whose illnesses were not
viewed by them as unduly threatening were
calm in the clinic setting. Ceruloplasmin
levels for the two groups are shown in
Table 3.
No attempt was made to determine a pre—
cise psychiatric diagnosis, but the behavior
disturbances in the one group were of neurotic proportions. Increased ceruloplasmin
levels in the disturbed group are evident and
are signiﬁcant at the 0.001 level of probabil—
ity.

Comment
The correlation of elevated ceruloplasmin
with particular types of behavioral disturb~
ances apparently involving an alteration in
“feeling state” raises the problem of the
mechanism of ceruloplasmin production. In-

asmuch as hallucinogenic agents, such as the
present one (see also Alkerfeldtﬁ Abood“)
seem to stimulate ceruloplasmin production
only during the hallucinatory or psychogen—
ically disturbed phase, a central mechanism
would appear to be involved. It is of par—
320

ticular signiﬁcance that the onset of the
enzyme elevation is within minutes after
the occurrence of hallucinations or anxiety,
suggesting a rather unique mechanism for
enzyme production. Contrary to our origi—
nal expectations, an elevation in blood
pyrocatechol amines, which are apparently
endogenous substrates for ceruloplasmin,
was not, in itself, a stimulus for increased
production of ceruloplasmin, but, rather,
caused a decrease in many instances. What
increases were noted in the infusion studies
were apparently related to anxiety reactions
to the manipulative procedures involved’in
handling the subjects. Since, in the present
studies, no noticeable alterations in feeling
state resulted directly from the pyrocatechol
amines, it remains to be seen whether in
those instances in which such reactions
have been attributable to infused epineph—
rine8 an elevation in ceruloplasmin does
occur. Future studies are aimed at the
clariﬁcation of many of these points.
The suggestion that changes in cerulo—
plasmin may reﬂect alterations in emotional
state has been proposed by others. Leach
and associates9 have postulated that many
environmental factors, including stress, can
alter the enzyme level. Meduna4 described
a patient who exhibited a high serum cerulo—
plasmin &gt;during an acute schizophrenic
psychosis and a normal value during a lucid
interval. Hoffer10 has noted an increase
in a serum pyrocatechol oxidase (presum—
ably not ceruloplasmin) during the acute
phase of a schizophrenic attack. Schizophrenia is a genetic limitation involving par—
ticular enzymes within the brain or
elsewhere in the organism. In the face of
environmental stress, such limitations be—
come prominent, and metabolic products
with psychotomimetic properties accumu—
late." The psychosis itself is ushered in
by the sensory distortions, altered feeling
state, and hallucinations so induced. Sub—
sequently, when the patient attempts to
reconcile his present state with his past ex—
perience, the disorganization of cortical
function begins.
Vol. 79,‘ March, 1958

�CERULOPLASMIN AND NEW HALLUCINOGEN

Numerous reports”12 are available on
the psychogenic properties of the bella—
donna alkaloids, but the effects were quite
variable and difﬁcult to interpret because
of the many peripheral side-effects, particularly with atropine. JR 318 possessed about
one—third of the cholineric—blocking effect of
atropine on smooth muscle,‘3 and at the
doses used in the present study produced
a slight, if any, effect on blood pressure,
heart rate, or gastrointestinal tract. Even
the more superﬁcial peripheral effects ob—
servable with atropine, such as mydriasis
and dryness of the mouth, were occasion—
ally absent with the doses of JB 318 used.
With regard to the possible mechanism
of JR 318 and other cholinergic—blocking
agents on the central nervous system, very
little'can be said. Although the evidence in
support of the role of acetylcholine as a
chemical transmitter in the central nervous
system is not convincing“:15 disturbances
in its concentration or action within the
central nervous system result in a wide
variety of psychic and neurological symp—
toms.
Many cholinergic agents, such as isoﬂuro—
phatef“,17 produce central nervous system
disturbances which are apparently associated
with the accumulation of acetylcholine in
the brain. The observations of Pfeiffer et
al.18 that the “muscarinic” component of
acetylcholine—like agents, such as arecoline
and physostigmine, are of value in the treat—
ment of catatonic schizophrenia, suggest a
role of acetylcholine in mental disease.
There would appear to be a conﬂict between
the argument that a cholinergic agent is
beneﬁcial in schizophrenia, while a choliner—
gic—blocking agent is psychotomimetic; but
the neural mechanisms involved in psycho—
genic phenomena are much too obscure to
justify the comment on this apparent dis—
crepancy. What is signiﬁcant is the fact
that acetylcholine does seem to inﬂuence
psychogenic phenomena and may be of im—
portance in the study of mental disease.
Ostfeld at al.

Summary
A recently synthesized atropine—like
compound, N-ethyl—3—piperidyl benzilate,
induced altered feeling states, visual and
auditory hallucinations, and increased se—
rum ceruloplasmin in seven of nine patients.
Infusion of four pyrocatechol amines—
epinephrine, levarterenol, isoproterenol, and
serotonin—appeared to have no effect per
se on serum ceruloplasmin. Iproniazid, an
amine—oxidase inhibitor, was likewise inef—
fective.
Serum ceruloplasmin undergoes small, but
signiﬁcant, increases during psychiatric disturbances of neurotic type and proportions,
and decreases by a similar amount during
periods of tranquility.
Department of Preventive Medicine, University
of Illinois College of Medicine (Dr. Ostfeld).

REFERENCES
Hughes, J. D., and Clark, J. H., Jr. Strontium
Poisoning: A Report of 2 Cases, J. A. M. A. 112:
1.

:

2500, 1939.

J. H.; Sprengeler, E. P.; Leiser, H. A.;
Homer, J.; Drukker, A., and Friedman, H. L.:
Antispasmodics: II. Derivatives of N—Substituted—
3-Piperidols, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77:2250, 1955.
3. Biel, J. H.: Personal communication to the
authors.
4. Brain Research Foundation, papers read at
Medical Conference, Chicago, Jan. 12—13, 1957,
by Akerfeldt,5 Abood,8 and Meduna.
5. Akerfeldt, S.: Oxidation of N,N-Dimethyl—p'
plienylenediamine by Serum from Patients with
Mental Disease, Science 1252117, 1957.
6. Abood, L. G.; Gibbs, F. A., and Gibbs, E.:
Comparative Study of Blood Ceruloplasmin in
Schizophrenia and Other Disorders, A. M. A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 772643, 1957.
7. Holmberg, C. G., and Laurell, C. B.: Investigations in Serum Copper: IlI. Ceruloplasmin
as an Enzyme, 'Acta chem. scandinav. 5:476, 1951.
8. Hoffer, A.: Epinephrine Derivatives as Potential Schizophrenic Factors, Quart. Rev. Psychiat.
&amp; Neurol. 18:27, 1957.
9. Leach, B. E.; Cohen, M.; Heath, R. G., and
Martens, 8.: Studies of the Role of Ceruloplasmin
and Albumin in Adrenaline Metabolism, A. M.A.
Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 762635, 1956.
10. Hoffer, A.: Conference on Biochemistry and
Mental Disease, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, B. C., Canada, June, 1957.
2. Biel,

321

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND
11.

Quigley, J. P.: Mental Disturbances from

Atropine or Novatropine to Subjects Under the
Inﬂuence of Insulin, J. A. M. A. 10921363, 1937.
12. Wangeman, C. P., and Hawk, M. H.: The
Effects of Morphine, Atropine and Scopolamine on
Human Subjects, Anesthesiology 3:24, 1942.
13. Ewing, P. L.; Seager, L. D.; Keller, G.,
and Dodson, D.: Cardiovascular Effects of Some
Derivatives,
J.
Diphenylacetate
3-Piperdy1
Pharmacol. &amp; Exper. Therap. 110217, 1954.
14. Eccles, J. C.: The Physiology of Nerve
Cells, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1956.
15. Feldberg, W. S.: Central and Sensory Trans—
mission, Pharmacol. Rev. 6285, 1954.

322

PSYCHIATRY

Koelle, G. B., and Gilman, A.: The Chronic
Toxicity of Di—Isopropylﬂuorophosphate (DFP)
in Dogs, Monkeys and Rats, J. Pharmacol. &amp;
16.

,

Exper. Therap. 872435, 1946.
17. Rowntree, D. W.; Nevin, S., and Wilson, A.:
The Effects of Diisopropylﬂuorophosphonate in
Schizophrenia and Manic Depressive Psychosis, J.
Neurol. Neurosurg. &amp; Psychiat. 13:47, 1950.
18. Pfeiffer, C. C., and Jenney, E. H.: The 111-

hibition of the Conditioned Response and the
Counteraction of Schizophrenia by Muscarinic
Stimulation of the Brain, Ann. Nevv York Acad.
Sc. 662753, 1957.

'-

Printed and Published in the United States of America

�DEPARTMENT OF
PSYCHIATTY
EXPERIMENTAL

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLE.

CAKS.

MAY-1

4's;

N

Y.

�Vol. 167, No.

l

MEDICAL LITERATURE ABSTRACTS

neuralgic pain from herpes zoster, and in patients
with tabetic crisis. R 875 was then given to 8 patients with psychalgia in whom a diagnosis of cenesthopathia associated with depression had been
made. In these patients the drug proved to be
ineffective; it was tolerated badly and the cenesthopathia frequently was increased. Thus, the effectiveness of the drug in patients with organic
syndromes contrasted with its complete ineffectiveness in those with psychalgia.
R 875 may be administered orally or subcutaneously; the intravenous route of administration is
contraindicated because of the risk of respiratory
accidents. Certain undesirable side-effects of the
drug, such as malaise, nausea, vomiting, and oc—
casionally drowsiness, require care in administering
it; rest in bed is advisable, at least for the initial
phase of the treatment.
the Hearing Level Following Severe
Poliomyelitis. R. Batson and F. McConnell. A. M. A.
J. Dis. Child. 95:139-145 (Feb.) 1958 [Chicago].
A Study of

The authors report on 87 selected, extensively
paralyzed patients, between the ages of 5 and 37
years, with poliomyelitis who underwent detailed
audiological assessment in order to determine the
precise status of auditory acuity. The audiograms
obtained from these patients were compared with
those obtained during the same period from 2
groups of young adults without poliomyelitis. Near—
ly all the pure-tone thresholds in the patients with
poliomyelitis departed from the zero decibel reference level by more than 10 db., indicating some
depression of hearing acuity as compared with the
levels in the control subjects, which adhered ex—
tremely closely to the zero decibel reference level,
denoting normal threshold of audibility. Inspection
of the pure-tone and speech thresholds in the
patients with poliomyelitis revealed that more than
75% (28 patients) showed at least a slight depression
of acuity which would be considered deviant from
the norm. Numerous factors were considered in an
effort to clarify the causative signiﬁcance of the reduction in sensitivity to auditory stimuli in the patients with poliomyelitis. Factors such as age, sex,
and possible drug therapy were not thought to
inﬂuence these results. It was believed that depressed hearing responses could not be attributed
to emotional disturbances or lethargy accompanying serious illness, since the patients gave oral responses to speech-hearing tests which required
more physical energy than the effort required for
signaling in response to pure-tone stimuli. It was
found that the duration of disability did not correlate well with the extent of hearing loss. Several
patients who were ambulatory and others who were
in a wheelchair throughout the day demonstrated
the same defect. A signiﬁcant correlation, however,
was observed between loss in hearing and loss in

117

vital capacity, in that patients with marked decrease
in vital capacity were apt to show signiﬁcantly
greater hearing loss. The signiﬁcance of this is not
clear, and it may be only a reﬂection of the severity
of the disease in a particular patient. Because there
are many other clinical symptoms more distressing
to the patient and the physician, and since communication with such patients is usually at close
range, reduction in sensitivity to auditory stimuli
can be easily overlooked even when it reaches moderate proportions of severity. The causative signiﬁcance of this ﬁnding is not clear.
New Group of Psychotomimetic Agents. L. C.
Abood, A. M. Ostfeld and J. Biel. Proc. Soc. Exper.
Biol. 8: Med. 97:483-486 (Feb.) 1958 [Utica, N. Y.].
A

group of piperidyl benzilates possessing anticholinergic properties were recently synthesized as
possible antispasmodics in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. In the course of therapeutic trials, it was
found that the tertiary amine hydrochlorides of the
benzilate esters, although active anticholinergics,
produced undesirable side-effects, particulary hallucinations. The quaternary ammonium salts, on
the other hand, were entirely devoid of such effects.
The authors recently obtained a series of such substances and examined their psychotomimetic effects
on animals and human subjects. The psychotogenic
effects of the N-methyl-S-piperidyl benzilate and
related congeners were tested on more than 40
human volunteers. Although some of the patients
had limited knowledge of the psychotogenic action
of the drugs, the majority of the subjects were completely unaware of their nature. All the agents were
tested for their behavioral effects on animals, including some 30 Siamese ﬁghting ﬁsh, 50 rodents,
and 5 cats. The action of these agents on the Siamese ﬁghting ﬁsh is comparable to the action described for lysergic acid diethyl amide (LSD) by
Abramson. In rodents there were marked behavioral
changes, such as initial excitement and marked
hyperactivity, spontaneous squealing, lack of responsiveness to stimuli, muscular weakness, and
lethargy.
The compounds proved to be extremely powerful
hallucinogens, in many respects more interesting
than LSD and mescaline. When administered in
oral doses of 5 to 15 mg. to human volunteers, distinct auditory and visual hallucinations occurred
within 1 hour in every individual and recurred
periodically for periods up to 10 hours after administration of the drug. Hallucinations were accompanied by gross distortions of visual images
and severe alterations in feeling state. A number of
subjects exhibited paranoid and megalomanic delusions, while the affective states ranged from a
feeling of unpleasantness to extreme terror. Some
of the subjects actually carried on conversations
with imaginary individuals involving situations datA

_

�118

MEDICAL LITERATURE ABSTRACTS

ing back 10 to 20 years. The subjects receiving 10
mg. (orally) of N-methyl-S—piperidyl benzilate were
in complete loss of contact with the environment for
many hours while experiencing dramatic visual and
auditory hallucinations. In many respects these
anticholinergic agents come closer to simulating
clinical psychoses than do mescaline and LSD. Of
all the compounds tested for hallucinogenic properties, N-Methyl-S-piperidyl benzilate is the most
potent, with the N-ethyl derivative being somewhat
less effective. The tetramethyl derivative is considerably less effective than the N-ethyl derivative.
The quaternary derivative is devoid of psychotogenic effects. As for the antispasmodic potency, although the 3 substances possessing psychotogenic
properties are perhaps the most potent, the remaining compounds are still quite effective.

Recurrence of Glioma of Cerebral Hemispheres:
Histological Features and Therapeutic Possibilities.
I. Papo and R. Tritapepe. Minerva chir. 12:144-31446 (Nov. 30) 1957 (In Italian) [Turin, Italy].
A second surgical procedure was performed on
34 patients with a recurrent supratentorial glioma.
At the ﬁrst operation this tumor appeared to be an
astrocytoma in 7 patients, an oligodendroglioma in
7, a glioblastoma in 16, and a changing type of tumor in 4. Histopathological changes from astrocytoma to glioblastoma were observed in 1 patient 11
months after the ﬁrst operation. It is possible, however, that areas of glioblastoma were originally
present. Atypical areas were found in sections of
the oligodendroglioma in 4 patients, who were
operated on, from 35 to 103 months after the ﬁrst
operation. This phenomenon could justify the differentiation of the oligodendroglioma. The immature and atypical features of glioblastoma became
more evident at the second operation. A type
of glioma, which originally appeared to be oligodendroglioma with atypical areas, changed into
glioblastoma in 1 patient 25 months after the ﬁrst
operation.
The longest postoperative survival period in patients with astrocytoma was 19 months, in those
with oligodendroglioma 21 month, in those with
glioblastoma 26 months, and in those with a
changing type of glioma 6 months. The authors
point out that in most instances there is reappearance of the symptoms of glioma rather than its recurrence. Astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma often
change into glioblastoma. There is no evidence to
show whether this is due to the intrinsic character—
istics of the tumor, to the surgical intervention, or
to the x-ray therapy. A gradual higher degree of
malignancy seems to develop even in those gliomas
which did not originally present a neoplastic structure. Surgical therapy, with rare exceptions, affords
no beneﬁt to patients with recurrent glioblastoma
but may be considered in patients with recurrent
astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma.

].A.M.A., May 3, 1958

GYNECOLOGY &amp; OBSTETRICS

Induction of Ovulation in the Human: Therapeutic
and Diagnostic Importance. H. S. Kupperman,
J. A. Epstein, M. H. G. Blatt and A. Stone. Am. ].
Obst. 8: Gynec. 75:801-309 (Feb.) 1958 [St. Louis].
The authors explain on the basis of a diagram
the current status of knowledge of the normal
cyclic functioning of the pituitary-ovarian axis. A
defect or alteration in any one of this normally
sequential series of interactions can result in menstrual irregularities, ovulatory failure, and/0r amenorrhea. It was felt that speciﬁc hormone therapy
in properly selected cases of failure of ovulation
might artiﬁcially trigger the defective ovulatory
mechanism. Since the proposed therapy theoreti—
cally was to be speciﬁc for an isolated defect in
ovulation, patients with other hormonal imbalances
that secondarily inﬂuence the pituitary-ovarian axis
were not included in the series. The patients who
were euthyroid with normal adrenal function and
who menstruated fairly regularly or who menstruated after therapy with progesterone and
showed an absence of pregnanediol with a ﬂat
basal body temperature were judged as having
ovulatory failure and fulﬁlled the criteria established for the “potentially responsive” cases. Those
whose only endocrinopathy was failure of ovulation
received 20 mg. of conjugated estrogens (equine),
administered intravenously as a single dose, not
sooner than the 18th day of the menstrual cycle. Of
the 40 patients treated, 31 were barren, and 9 were
either single women with menstrual irregularities
or married women practicing contraception.
Nine pregnancies resulted among the 17 infertile
patients in whom ovulation was induced after no
more than 2 injections of estrogens given intrave—
nously at intervals determined by the patients’ own
basal body temperature charts. The history of infertility in the 9 women in whom treatment resulted
in pregnancy ranged from 2 to 7 years. One of the
nonpregnant patients had her ﬁrst spontaneous
ovulatory menses in 3 years in the cycle subsequent
to the menses induced by estrogens given intra—
venously. Three other patients with a history of
only infrequently occurring spontaneous ovulatory
menses also had normal 28-day cycles for 1 period
after that induced by estrogen. Moreover, 4 of the
9 pregnancies occurred during the cycle subsequent
to the estrogen-induced ovulatory response. The
negative responses were due to mechanical inability of the ovaries to respond to pituitary stimulation, i. e., polycystic ovaries of the Stein-Leventhallike syndrome, where the thickened ﬁbrous tuniCa
presents a mechanical barrier to ovulation. Surgical
exploration with bilateral ovarian wedge resection
was advised in 8 of 12 infertile patients who were
negative responders. In each of the 8 patients op-

�COUNCIL ON DRUGS

1634

Orphenadrine Hydrochloride.—N,N-Dimethyl-2(o-methyl-a-phenylbenzyloxy) ethylamine hydrochloride—The structural formula of orphenadrine
hydrochloride may be represented as follows:
[CH3

CH

Cy

0 CH2CH2N\

CH3

'

HCI

CH3

~

Actions and Uses.—Orphenadrine hydrochloride,
the o-methyl analogue of the antihistamine, diphenhydramine hydrochloride, produces a reduction of
voluntary muscle spasm. The effect is central, presumably by an inhibitory action on cerebral motor
areas, and resembles the central effects of atropine.
Orphenadrine exerts only weak antihistaminic and
sedative eHects. It is not primarily a peripherally
acting anticholinergic agent since, in therapeutic
doses, it produces few of the typical effects on
smooth muscle, the eye, or secretory glands which
characterize atropine and other peripheral para—
sympathetic blocking agents. The skeletal muscle
relaxation is not of the type produced by mephenesin or zoxazolamine, since there is no evidence that
it interrupts transmission through peripheral neuromuscular pathways. Nor is there any indication that
it acts at the myoneural junction in the manner of
the curariform drugs; it does not cause ganglionic
blockade.
Orphenadrine has been used for the symptomatic
management of paralysis agitans (Parkinson’s disease). Subjective observations seem to indicate
that the drug may bring about beneﬁcial effects in
approximately half of the patients so treated.
Rigidity is apparently relieved much more readily
than is tremor; in occasional patients with severe
spasticity, tremor may even be accentuated as the
spasticity is relieved. Other salutary effects ascribed to the action of the drug include relief of
oculogyria, sialorrhea, diaphoresis, blepharospasm,
and disturbances in gait and balance. The drug
also exerts a euphoriant effect which is useful in
combating the depression and fatigue that frequently accompany this syndrome. In common with
other antiparkinsonian drugs, the therapeutic effectiveness of orphenadrine diminishes with prolonged
use. For this reason, and because it is considered
somewhat less active than other antiparkinsonian
drugs, orphenadrine is probably best employed as
an adjunct to such other agents as procyclidine,
trihexyphenidyl, cycrimine, or benztropine for the
treatment of paralysis agitans. It may, however,
be tried alone for patients who have become refractory to the other antiparkinsonian drugs.
Because of its antispastic effect on voluntary
muscle, orphenadrine has been proposed for use
in a variety of clinical conditions which may be
unrelated in etiology but in which pain due to

J.A.M.A., July 26, 1958

skeletal muscle spasm is present. These have been
described as sprains, strains, ﬁbrositis, whiplash injuries, noninﬂammatory rheumatic and arthritic
states, and torticollis. Although such use might be
considered a logical clinical application of the
drug’s pharmacological action, the evidence available to date is not adequate to permit a sound
conclusion as to the ultimate effectiveness of such
therapy. Further studies are also needed to conﬁrm
the possible usefulness of orphenadrine in the
treatment of the extrapyramidal involvement associated with high doses of reserpine or phenothiazine-type tranquilizing agents.
The clinical toxicity of orphenadrine hydrochloride appears to be low, at least with therapeutic
doses. Thus far, side-effects have been limited to
nausea, dryness of the mouth, dizziness, mild excitation, and occasional hallucinations. Most of these
effects tend to subside or disappear with a reduction in dosage. Because of its anticholinergic classiﬁcation, orphenadrine should be administered cautiously to patients with glaucoma, tachycardia, or
urinary retention.
Dosage—Orphenadrine hydrochloride is administered orally. The usual initial dose is 50 mg. given
three times a day. This dosage should then be ad—
justed according to the clinical response of the
individual patient and the appearance of sideeffects.
Preparations: tablets 50 mg.
Applicable commercial name: Disipal.
Biker Laboratories, Inc., cooperated by furnishing scientiﬁc data to aid in the evaluation of orphenadrine hydrochloride.

Pancreatic Dornase.—A stabilized preparation of
the enzyme, deoxyribonuclease, prepared by fractional precipitation of aqueous acid extracts of beef
pancreas followed by dialysis, sterilization by ﬁltration, and lyophilization. The activity of pancreatic
dornase is determined by measuring the rate at
which it reduces the viscosity of thymus deoxyribonucleic acid, potency being expressed in terms of
units. One unit is an amount of enzyme which
causes a drop of one viscosity unit in 10 minutes at
30 C, where the flow-time of water is taken as one
viscosity unit.
Actions and Uses—Pancreatic dornase is derived
from beef pancreas, and, in contrast to the deoxyribonucleases produced by hemolytic streptococci
(streptodornase), it is a single nuclease. Like
streptodornase, it acts directly upon a substrate
of deoxyribonucleoprotein (and deoxyribonucleic
acid). The action of pancreatic dornase has been
characterized as one of rapid depolymerization,
with a resulting decrease in viscosity of purulent
material. Pancreatic dornase degrades deoxyribonucleoprotein to relatively large-sized fragments,
thus differing from streptodornase, which continues

�Vol. 167, No. 13

COUNCIL ON DRUGS

Mepazine Hydrochloride. — 10—[(1-Methyl-3—piperidyl ) methyl] phenothiazine hydrochloride—The
structural formula of mepazine hydrochloride may
be represented as follows:
N-CH;

&lt;

CH2

(II)
.3

-

HCI

Actions and Uses—Mepazine hydrochloride is a
phenothiazine derivative with actions and uses
similar to, but not identical with, those of chlorpromazine. Although less potent, mepazine is not
merely a weak chlorpromazine. Pharmacological
studies indicate that it differs from chlorpromazine
in that it does not lower the body temperature in
rats as does chlorpromazine; it does not antagonize
the waltzing syndrome in mice as does chlorpromazine; and it augments carotid sinus reﬂexes in
cats whereas chlorpromazine inhibits them. The
signiﬁcance of these differences with respect to its
clinical usefulness is, at present, unclear. The drug
is used principally for its calming or tranquilizing
action in the management of neuroses and psychoses in which anxiety, tension, agitation, and
increased psychomotor activity are predominant; it
is said to exert a selective action to normalize the
thinking process of mentally or emotionally disturbed patients. Because mepazine is less potent
than chlorpromazine, it does not produce the excessive sedation, drowsiness, and depression which
frequently accompany therapy with the latter drug.
On the other hand, the diminished potency of
mepazine makes it less effective than chlorpromazine for the long—term control of the most severe
forms of agitation and tension; it has little or no
immediate effect on acute psychotic disturbances.
In terms of over-all psychotherapeutic effectiveness, mepazine might be considered to be intermediate between the most potent agents such as
chlorpromazine and the milder agents such as
meprobamate.
Like chlorpromazine and other phenothiazine derivatives, mepazine hydrochloride exerts an antiemetic effect and may be used for the control of
nausea and vomiting from a variety of causes. The
drug has also been used for its calming effects in
surgery, in obstetrics, and in anesthesia. Other reported clinical applications include use in narcotic
withdrawal to control restlessness and agitation, in
chronic alcoholism to lessen anxiety and tensions,
and in advanced neoplastic states to reduce the

1633

quantity of narcotics needed for control of pain.
However, sufﬁcient evidence is not available to
establish its usefulness for the latter purposes.
The acute toxicity of mepazine hydrochloride in
experimental animals is less than that of chlorpromazine hydrochloride, and, in general, its clinical
use is followed by a somewhat lower incidence of
side-effects and untoward reactions. As already indicated, the usual doses produce a calming effect,
with little sedation and drowsiness. Although jaundice has not as yet been observed with administration of mepazine, physicians should be alert to its
possible occurrence. The drug should not be given
to patients with a history of jaundice or liver damage. The most frequent side-effects of mepazine are
atropine-like in nature and include blurring of
vision, dryness of the mouth, and constipation.
Since constipation can lead to more serious forms
of intestinal obstruction, it should not be neglected;
if necessary, laxatives should be prescribed. Less
frequent side-effects include occasional dizziness,
tremor, urinary retention, and transient hypoten—
sion. The most serious toxic reaction to mepazine
is referable to hematopoietic depression. As with
chlorpromazine, the drug can produce leukopenia
and granulocytopenia. It should, therefore, be used
with discretion; peripheral blood cell counts are
indicated at frequent intervals during therapy, and
patients should be advised to report to the physician immediately upon the onset of fever, sore
throat, or marked weakness. Because it potentiates
the action of other central nervous system depressants, mepazine is contraindicated in patients under
the inﬂuence of large doses of narcotics, barbiturates, or unknown large quantities of alcohol.
Dosage.—Mepazine hydrochloride is administered orally. For the treatment of ambulatory
neurotic patients, the usual initial dose is 25 mg.
three or four times daily. This dosage can be increased every week by increments of 25 mg. per
day until the desired effect has been attained. For
those psychiatric conditions which are severe
enough to require hospitalization of the patient,
the initial dose is 100 mg. per day; this may be
increased by 50 mg. every ﬁve to seven days. Maintenance dosage for such patients is usually 400 mg.
per day or more.
For the treatment of nausea and vomiting, the
dosage ranges from 50 to 100 mg. per day. Dosage
for use in surgical and obstetric patients has not
been ﬁrmly established; single doses ranging from
50 to 200 mg. or more have been employed.
Preparations: tablets 25, 50, and 100 mg.
Applicable commercial name: Pacatal Hydrochloride.

’

�COUNCIL ON DRUGS

1632

the bacteria, as such, responded to the antibiotics,
i. e., a transformation of the original bacterial
arthritis into a chemical arthritis occurred. If the
nodules were originally situated only in the skin
(as clinically described) and only later appeared
in the subcutaneous fat tissue (as described in the
biopsy specimen and at autopsy), one could postulate that originally circulating trypsin caused
vascular alterations in the deeper layer of the
corium, with resultant skin nodules, and later the
circulating lipase resulted in subcutaneous fat
necrosis and subcutaneous nodules.
Summary
A chronic alcoholic patient had episodes of
abdominal pain for two years, on the basis of a
relapsing pancreatitis. Four weeks prior to his
death, he developed swelling and tenderness of the
various joints, with chills and fever. This could
have been due to a bacterial polyarthritis associated
with an acute pulmonary lesion such as pneumonia.
The bacterial infection could have precipitated an
acute pancreatic fat necrosis, on the basis of a
Schwartzman phenomenon. Excessive amounts of
circulating enzymes (trypsin and lipase) caused a
striking involvement of the extrapancreatic fat tissue, cutaneous and subcutaneous nodules of fat
necrosis, and necrosis of the periarticular fat tissue,
initiating a chemical polyarthritis. The abdominal
symptoms that appeared later were due to extensive

J.A.M.A., July 26, 1958

mesenteric fat necrosis. The terminal jaundice was
due to hepatocellular damage (toxic hepatitis)
secondary to the pancreatic and extrapancreatic fat
necrosis. The depression of blood calcium level was
characteristic for extensive pancreatic fat necrosis
and was due to saponification of the fatty acids
liberated from neutral fat by the enzymatic action
of pancreatic lipase.
References
1. Roberts, N. J.; Baggenstoss, A. H.; and Comfort, M. W.:
Acute Pancreatic Necrosis: Clinicopathologic Study, Am. J.
Clin. Path. 20:742-764 (Aug) 1950.
2. Balser, W.: Ueber Fettnekrose, eine zuweilen todtliche
Krankheit des Menschen, Virchows Arch. f. path. Anat.,

90:520-535, 1882.

3. Hansemann, D.: Discussion in Verhandlungen arzt-

licher Gesellschaften, Berl. klin. Wchnschr. 26:1115, 1889.
Blauvelt, H.: Case of Acute Pancreatitis with Subcutaneous
Fat Necrosis, Brit. J. Surg. 34:207-208 (Oct.) 1946.
4. Ponﬁck, E.: Ueber die sympathischen Erkrankungen
des Knochenmarkes bei inneren Krankheiten, Virchows Arch.
f. path. Anat. 56:534-556, 1872. Scarpelli, D. 0.: Fat Necrosis of Bone Marrow in Acute Pancreatitis, Am. J. Path. 32:
1077-1087 (Sept-Oct.) 1956.
5. Vogel, F. S.: Cerebral Demyelination and Focal Visceral
Lesions in Case of Acute Hemorrhagic Pancreatitis, with
Consideration of Possible Role of Circulating Enzymes in
Causations of Lesions, A. M. A. Arch. Path. 52:355-362

(Oct)

1951.

and Brakney, E. L.: Acute Hemorrhagic Pancreatic Necrosis Produced by Local Schwartzman Reaction:
Experimental Study on Pancreatitis, J. A. M. A. 1553569574 (June 5) 1954.
7. Richman, A.: Acute Pancreatitis, Am. J. Med. 21:2466. Thal, A.,

274

(Aug)

1956.

COUNCIL ON DRUGS
NEW AND NONOFFICIAL DRUGS
Monographs and supplemental statements on drugs described here and in subsequent editions of New and Nonofﬁcial Drugs are based on the evaluation of available scientiﬁc data
and reports of investigations.
H. D. KAUTZ, M.D., Secretary.
Mepazine Acetate.—10-[ ( l-Methyl-S-piperidyl)
methyl]phenothiazine acetate—The structural formula of mepazine acetate may be represented as
follows :
N " CH3

&lt;

0

CH2
‘

u

CH3C OH

Actions and Uses.—Mepazine acetate has the
same actions and uses as mepazine hydrochloride,
except that it is administered parenterally. (See
the monograph on mepazine hydrochloride.)
Dosage—Mepazine acetate is administered by
intramuscular or intravenous injection. For severely

agitated psychotic patients, the dose by either route
is 50 mg. three or four times daily. For the treatment of severe nausea and vomiting, daily doses of
25 to 75 mg. are injected intramuscularly. Dosage
for use in surgical and obstetric patients has not
been ﬁrmly established, but single intramuscular or
intravenous doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg. or
more have been employed.
Mepazine acetate may be injected parenterally
either as the full-strength solution or as a diluted
solution. Chloride or alkaline solutions should not
be used as diluents since they cause precipitation
of mepazine acetate. Oral therapy with the hydrochloride salt should be substituted for parenteral
injection as soon as possible.
Preparations: solution (injection) 50 mg. in 2 cc.
Applicable commercial name: Pacatal Acetate.

�1631

DIAGNOSTIC PROBLEMS

Vol. 167, No. 13

with antigenic properties may cause a Schwartzman
reaction, and antigenic speciﬁcity is not involved,
i. e., the provocative antigen need not be identical
with the sensitizing antigen.
It may be recalled that, in the case under discussion, the joint involvement was conspicuous
early in the course of the disease. There was no
deﬁnite evidence of rheumatoid arthritis, either
clinically or pathologically. Bacterial polyarthritis,
speciﬁcally of gonorrheal origin, should be considered, although a most careful search failed to
reveal any evidence for a gonorrheal infection of
the genital organs. Gonorrhea] polyarthritis in the
early stages shows a serous type of synovitis, and
cultures of synovial fluid may be negative.
The association of polyarthritis with periarticular
fat necrosis and pancreatic fat necrosis raises the
following possibilities: 1. There may have been a
rheumatoid
of
coincidence
polyarthritis
a
pure
with pancreatic fat necrosis, whereby the peri-

The interesting feature of this case was the onset,
with polyarthritis followed by the appearance of
disseminated subcutaneous nodules, while the
abdominal symptoms appeared later. The involvement of the pancreas proper, revealed at autopsy,

TABLE 3.—Etiology of

Acute Pancreatitis“

I. The common channel theory: reﬂux of bile into pancreatic duct
secondary to obstruction of ampulla of Vater
a. Calculus at ampulla of Vater
b. Spasrn of the sphincter of Oddi
c. Edema
II. Obstruction of pancreatic ducts by
1. Stone
2. Spasrn of sphincter of ampulla of Vater
3.
4.
5.
6.

Fig. 5.—Relatively well-preserved body and tail of pancreas. Large hemorrhagic, chalky, mesenteric mass extends downward from pancreas.

III. Alcohol
A. Acute
B. Nutritional
IV. Metabolic disturbances
1. Malnutrition (as it has been produced
experimentally by ethionine)

was not too extensive; it is possible that extrapancreatic involvement occurred early and was
limited to the retroperitoneal space, enabling the
escape of pancreatic lipase into the circulation by
way of the lymphatics, circumventing the enterohepatic circulation. The resultant high lipase levels
may account for the extensive involvement of the
joints and skin.
The various theories about the etiology and

2.

Site

Trauma
VI. Vascular changes

(Necrotizing arteriolitis; periarteritis nodosa)
VII. Infection
(e. g. mumps, scpticemic, acute cholecystitis?)
VIII. Allergic
a. Schwart7m3.n phenomenon
*

Extrapancreatic Fat Necrosis
In Literature In Our Case

+
+
.......................
Retroperitoneal fat tissue ..................
+
+
Mediastinal tat tissue ......................
+
—
Subepicardial fat tissue ....................
+
Subcutaneous fat tissue ...................
+
+
—
Bone marrow ...............................
+
Central nervous system
+
(perivascular demyelinization) ...........
+
—
Periarticular fat tissue .....................
+
necrosis at the site of the original intradermal
Mesenteric fat tissue

Hyperlipemia

V.

pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis are summarized
in table 3. An interesting recent theory6 relates
acute pancreatitis to the Schwartzman phenomenon, whereby intradermal injection of a cell-free
ﬁltrate of Salmonella, followed by intravenous injection of the same ﬁltrate, results in hemorrhagic
TABLE 2.—-Sites of

Edema of papilla of Vater
Tumor of pancreas
Squamous metaplasia of the epithelium in the ducts
Surgical ligature

——

V

injection. Using this principle, injection of a bacterial endotoxin in sublethal doses into a pancreatic
duct, with a subsequent provocative intravenous
injection of the same endotoxin, has produced a
fulminating pancreatitis in rabbits. Any substance

Richman" (modiﬁed).

articular fat necrosis occurred in a site of decreased
resistance; but, despite the high incidence of
rheumatoid arthritis and the relative frequency of
pancreatitis, such a coincidence of these with periarticular fat necrosis has never been reported.
2. The pancreatic fat necrosis in the early clinically
latent phase of the disease, with liberation of lipase
into the circulating blood, may have led to a chemical polyarthritis due to extensive periarticular fat
necrosis. 3. A bacterial (gonorrheal?) polyarthritis
preceding pancreatitis cannot be excluded, despite
the negative bacteriologic ﬁndings.
One might speculate, on the basis of morphologic
evidence of a chronic pancreatitis, that the pancreas
was already sensitized. A bacterial polyarthritis
could then have provided an antigenic provocation
for a Schwartzman phenomenon, which led to an
acute pancreatic fat necrosis, in the course of which
large amounts of circulating trypsin and lipase were
liberated. The circulating lipase caused a peri—
articular fat necrosis, which in turn caused a proression of the polyarthritis, despite the fact that

DEPAR MENT OF

EXPERIMENIAL PSYCHIATRY

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
GLEN OAKS, N. Y.

JUL3

1

‘5.

�elements.

3. The rhythm of

4

-6 cycle/sec in the

sub-

cortical area disappears completely following
administration of chlorpromazine in the dosage
of 7.5—10 mg per kg, and does not appear even
in response to painful stimulation with electric
current; which undoubtedly indicates an inhibitory effect of chlorpromazine on adrenergic
elements of these structures.
4. Administration of epinephrine against a
background of a pronounced chlorpromazine
effect produces a temporary decrease in symptoms of the chlorpromaaine effect on the organism. Accompanying this, there is a tendency
to activation of electrical activity in all parts
of the brain.

5. Comparison of our data with those in the
literature leads us to the conclusion that the
adrenergic substrate of the reticular formation exerts a complex inﬂuence on individual
structures within the reticular formation as
well as on the cerebral cortex. This action is
apparently associated with metabolism of
adrenergic substances, and for this reason it
changes in a reciprocal manner as a result of
the action of epinephrine and chlorpromazine.
RE FERENCES
1.

2.

AGAFONOV,

V.G., Zhurn. nevropatolog.

ipsikhiatr., 56,
ANOKHIN, P.K.,

No. 2, 94, 1956.

XX Mezhdunarodnyi kon—
v Briussele (Collected

gress fiziologov
papers, 20th International Congress of
Physiologists in Brussels), 151, M. ,

3.

4.
5.

6.
’

7.
8.

1956; Fiziolog. zhurn. USSR, 43, No. 11,
1072, 1957; Zhurn. vyssh. nervn. deiat..
9, No. 4, 489, 1959.
ANOKHINA, I.P., Zhurn. nevropatologi
psikhiatr., 56, No. 6, 478, 1956.
BAN'I‘SEKINA, M.M., Biull. eksper.
biolog. i med., No. 8, 3, 1959.
VERSHININ, N.V., Farmakologiiamchobnik) 137, M., 1952.
GAVLICHEK, V., Fiziolog. Zhurn. USSR,
44, No. 4, 305, 1958.
DOBRZHANSKAIA, A.K., Zhurn. vyld.
nervn. deiat.. 9, No. 1, 22, 1959.
POPOV, E.A. and T.A. NEVZOROVA,

Zhurn. nevropatolog.

No. 7, 559, 1956.

9. SHUMILLNA,

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

56.

A.I., Zhurn. nevropatolog.

ipsikhiatr, 56,

10.

ipsikhiatr..

No. 2, 118, 1956; Kinf.

po vopr. elektrofiziolog. ts. n. s..
Tez. dokl. (Abstracts of Confsnnes on
Problems of Electrophysiology of the
C.N.S.), 144, M., 1958.
BRADLEY, P.B. and A.I. HAUCE, EIG
clin. Neurophysiol., 9, 2, 191, 1957.
DELL, P., M. BONVALLET and A.
HUGELIN, Journ. Physiol., 48, 403,
1956.
GANGLOF‘F, H. and M. MONNIER, Physiol. et Pharmacol., acta, 15, l, 83,
1957.
RINALDI, F. and H. HIMWICH, Dis.
Nerv. System, 16, 5, 1955.
ROTHBALLER, A.B., EEG clin. Neurophysiol., 8, 603, 1956.
VOGT, M., Journ. Physiol.. 123, 451,
1954.

THE ANTAGONISTIC ACTION OF CHOLINOMIMECTIC

AND CENTRAL CHOLINOLYTIC AGENTS ON
THE EEG OF THE RABBIT

P.P.

DENISENKO, Division of Pharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Um}! Academy
of Medical Sciences, Leningrad (Received January 21, 1959)

Today the presence of cholinerglc synapses
in the central nervous system, particularly in
the cerebral cortex, is considered an estab—
lished fact. The cerebral cortex can be stimulated with acetylcholine (Markosian, 1937;

Feldberg, 1950) and various "cholinopositive"
substances — cholinomimetics (nicotine, arecoline) and anticholinesterases (physostigmine
and diethyl p-nitrophenyl phosphate, or phos-

phacol) — which, like acetylcholine, are
capable of causing excitation of choline-roactive systems (Rizzolo, 1929; Miller, 1037;
Stewart, 1952; Michaells, Finesinger, Ver—

ster, Erickson, 1954). The rate of proﬁle-

tion of acetylcholine in the cortex depends on
the functional state of the cortex (Macintosh
and Oborin, 1953).
The establishment of the role and significance

�of aeetylcholine in the activity of the cortex and
other parts of the brain has aided in the under—
standing and the correct evaluation and interpretation of the inﬂuence of cholinolytic drugs such
as atropine, scopolamine, etc. upon psychic
activity. ()1 the other hand, it has given rise
to the synthesis and investigation of new sub-

stances with cholinolytic action, inasmuch as
this opens up an opportunity for entirely new
methods in drug therapy of psychic and nervous
diseases and increases the armamentarium of
sedative and anticonvulsive drugs, as well as
antidotes for poisoning with anticholinesterases.
Among the cholinolytics known today there
are a considerable number of substances capable
of exerting a blocking inﬂuence chiefly on cholinergic structures in the central nervous system. Owing to the obvious predominance of
central cholinolytic action over peripheral,
substances of this type have, at the suggestion
of S.V. Anichkov, been classed in a separate
group — central cholinolytic agents.1
In chemical structure, central cholinolytic
agents in most cases are complex esters of
amino alcohols and aromatic acids, such 'as
diethylaminoethanol and diphenylacetic acid.
Pharmacologic studies of central cholinolytic
agents are conducted by various methods, especially the methods of conditioned reﬂexes and
electroencephalography; among others are experiments with convulsions produced by nicotine, arecoline, pentylenetetrazol, and other
'

drugs. As

research, electroencephalography is being increasingly widely
used. However, out of the large group of cen—
tral cholinolytic agents, this method has been
used only for partial investigation of caramiphen (Pentaphen, Parpanit), benactyzine (IEMa method of

22, Diazil), and Z—diethylaminoethyl diphenylacetate (Diphacil, Trasentine) (Schallek and
Smith, 1952; Paskov, 1958).
In the current study an electrophysiological
investigation was made of five new substances
synthetized by S. F. Torf in the chemical lab—
oratory of the Division of Pharmacology, In—

stitute

Fxperimental Medicine, USSR Acad—
emy of Medical Sciences: Preparation IBM263 (benzene sulfonate 0f l—diethylaniinoisopropyl methoxyd l pheny lacetate . Preparation
IEM-265, or Methyldiphacil (racemic
l—diethylaminoisop ropyl diphenylacetate hydrochloride), Preparation [EM—268 (racemic
1-dimethyl aminoisopropyl diphenylacetate
hydrochloride), Preparation [EM—273 (benzene—
sulfonate of 2-methylcholine diphenylacetate),
Preparation IBM—275, or Methyldiazil (racemic
l
«timethylaminoisopropyl benzilate hydrochloride». We also made a comparative study
of the influence of certain other central cholino1

‘The term "central cholinolytic agent" was
approved and accepted at the 9th All-Union
Conference of Physiologists, Biochemists,
and Pharmacologists in 1959.
125

olytic agents, namely Diphacil, Diazil, Pentaphen, Aprophen (ﬂ-diethylaminoethyl diphenylpropionate hydrochloride), Diprophen w—di-Npropyl thiodiphenylacetate hydrochloride), and
Tropacin (tropine diphenylacetate hydrochloride)
upon the bioelectrical activity of the brain.
METHOD

Experiments were conducted on rabbits
weighing 3 —4 kg with implanted nichrome or
platinum electrodes. Potentials from the cortex (temporal and occipital areas), thalamus,
and hypothalamus were recorded unipolarly.
Experimental equipment consisted of a differential amplifier from the Moscow experimental
shop and either an ink-writing or a type MPO—2
oscillograph. The amplitude—frequency characteristic of the ink-writing apparatus in the O —
70 cycle/sec range was flat to within 20%.
The inﬂuence of the central cholinolytics,
as well as of acetylcholine and cholinomimetics
(nicotine and arecoline), on the spontaneous
electrical activity of various parts of the brain
was investigated. In addition, electroencephalography was used to show the existence of
antagonism between these two groups of substances. No substance was administered to

the same animal more than once a week.
EXPERIME NT A l. RESULTS

Before proceeding with the study of the in—
ﬂuence of central cholinolytic agents on the
electrical activity of various parts of the brain,
we considered it necessary to determine how
it changes under the influence of acetylvholine
and cholinomimetics (nicotine and arecoline).
This was essential because one of the tests in
the study of substances of central cholinolytic
action involves a determination of their anticonvulsive activity in nicotine and arecoline
convulsions (Bovet and Longo, 1951; Kharauzov. 1954; Artem'ev, 1955. 1957; Zeimal',
1955, 1957; Golikov, 1956; Liberman, 1956;
Sokolova, 1957; Smirnov, 1957; Fedorchuk,
1958; Jacobson, 1958).
Intravenous injection of nicotine and arecoline (0.4 mg/kg) produces tremor and convulsions in the animal due to the stimulating effect
of these substances on the choline—reactive
systems of the brain. For further evaluation
and analysis of the influence of central cholinolytic agents on the bioelectrical activity of
the brain it was important to compare the picture of general excitation of the animal with the
changes in the electrical potentials of the brain.
Normally, the electrocorticogram of the
rabbit was made up chieﬂy of waves of medium
amplitude (30 -60 uv) and a rate of 4 —9 per
second. Superimposed on these we re fast
small waves with an amplitude of up to 15 av.
Occasionally single high-amplitude waves
appeared (5 —8 per min). As a rule, potentials

�large doses (0.4 -0.5 mg/kugi. 1.9. .dosos
which usually cause a convulsive seizure is
animal. In the last case we recorded simultaneously the champs in brain potentials and

of the thalamus and hypothalamus, were faster
than those of the cortex but of considerably
smaller amplitude (Fig. 1. 1-3; Fig. 2, 1-3;
l-‘ig. 3).

.l

FIG. 1. Influence of nicotine and Diphacil on the RH;

-

-

-

somatosensory cortex; B hypothalamus. l normal
EEG; 2 — 3 min after intravenous administration of nicotine
in a dose of 0.43 mg/kg; 3 — prior to administration
of Diphacil (6 days after the initial application of nicotine);
4 — 5 min after intravenous administration of Diphacil in a
dose of 5 rug/kg; 5 — absence of stimulating action of nicotine
(0.43 mg/kg) administered after Diphacil; 6 — 4 hours after
administration of the preparations.
A

Cholinomimetics (nicotine and arecoline)
were used in small doses (0.25 mg/kg) and

the contractions in the hind limb.
After the administration of choiinomimstios
126

�no

FIG. 2. Antagonism of cholinomimetic arecoline and choline—
lytic Methyldiazil displayed in the rabbit EEG.
A —

-

somatosensory cortex, B thalamus. 1 — normal EEG;
2 — 3 min after administration of
arecoline
in a dose of 0.45
mg/kg; 3
restoration of original state; 4 — 5 min after intravenous- administration of Methyldiazil (0.5 mg/kg); 5 —
absence
of stimulating influence of are coline in the
same dose after
Methyldiazil; 6 — 8 hours after administration
of the preparations.

-

the animal's behavior changed abruptly, espe—
cially if administration occurred against a background of general depression which was usually
observed after the rabbit had temporarily been
in a darkened room. Whereas prior to the ad—
ministration of the preparations the rabbit lay
quietly in its stand with its head between its
paws and at times even semi-asleep, following
administration of nicotine or arecoline it

exhibited unrest, turned its head, jerked,
pricked up its ears and reacted keenly to any
external stimulation. Mter epinephrine was

given intravenously in the dose of 0.4 mg/kg,
severe convulsive movements were observed
lasting, with interruptions, for several min—

utes.

Along with the changes in the behavior of

the animals already mentioned, there were
also marked changes in the spontaneous elec—
trical activity of the brain (Figs. 1 and 2).
These changes took the form of an increase in
amplitude and number of the high—frequency
potentials and quantitative diminution, to and
including complete disappearance, of high-

�FIG. 3. EEGs in various parts of the rabbit brain before
(upper oscillograms) and
5 min after (lower
oscillograms) intravenous administration of central cholinolytic
agents in the following doses: Diazil 0.5 mg/kg (A), Diphacil 5 mg/kg (B),
Aprophen 2 mg/kg (C).

Left, cortex; right, subcortical structures.
amplitude slow waves.
Changes in the EEG appearing after administration of nicotine evidently are not the result
of induction of muscle currents but reflect
changes in the electrical activity of the brain.
inasmuch as they precede motor excitation of
the animal. Such a supposition appears to be
even more probable because 10 — 15 min after
the strongest general excitation produced by
administration of nicotine, the rabbit calms
down (muscle tone becomes normal, movements decrease or disappear, and the animal
reposes quietly in its stand) . Simultaneously
with this, lowering of general EEG activity is
observed, with an increase in the number of
abrupt high waves and a diminution of the high-—
frequency discharges.
Comparison of changes in the EEGs of different parts of the brain discloses that follow—
ing administration of nicotine cortical potentials
show the first and strongest changes. Changes
in the EEGs of the hypothalamus, thalamus,
and other subcortical structures are less pronounced and appear later than the cortical
changes.
The other cholinomimetic, arecoline, in
doses of 0.4-0.5 mg/kg also had a stimulating
action: it caused unrest. convulsions, and
tremor, which, as is generally recognized,
are the result of the stimulating action of are—
coline on the choline-reactive systems of the
brain. The stimulating action of arecoline on
~

128

the brain is reﬂected in the EEG to the same
extent as is that of nicotine. As shown in
Fig. 2, the amplitude of the fast oscillations,
especially in the subcortex, rises sharply
and the number of oscillations increases

appreciably.

Typical changes characteristic of excitation
appeared in the EEG following intravenous injection of acetylcholine in doses of 0. l - 0. 8
‘y/kg. In doses of 1 ~50 'y/kg acetylchouno
produced such changes only du ring the first,
very brief timevinterval after the injection;
this was followed by a pronounced depression
of electrical activity.
Thus, in experiments with cholinomimetics
(nicotine and arecoline) and acetylcholine. a
characteristic picture of EEG changes a»
crease in amplitude and number of fut rhythms
and a decrease in slow waves) was produced
which in combination with changes in the
general condition and behavior of the rabbits
(excitation, tremor, convulsions) permits us to
regard, with a high degree of probability, the
observed picture of EEG changes as a roll..tion of cerebral excitation.
In addition, a clear—cut distinction was observed between the action of nicotine and arecoline on the cholinergic systems of the brain:
the first and most marked changes uder the
inﬂuence of nicotine are in the cortical EEG,
but under the inﬂuence of arecoline, in the subcortical structures. The changes produced by

�arecoline and nicotine are not identical in
duration. The intensification of activity prochiced by administration of nicotine lasts a
maximum of 10—15 min and is often succeeded
by a general dqreesion of electrical activity.
Potentials of normal magnitude and rhythm
appear in l - 1 1/2 hours, but the sensitivity of
the cholinsrgie systems to nicotine and mani—
festation of the corresponding reaction to nicotine are not restored for 4 -—5 days. Arecoline
a more lasting excitation which is succeeded by the normal EEG picture. 0n repeated
one hour after the first injection,
one may observe complete restoration of sensitivity b arecoline.
Ahinistration of central cholinolytic agents
gave opposite results. General calming of the
animal was observed following administration
of cholinolytic agents. This was manifested
especially prominently when central cholinolytic
agents were administered to animals which had
not yet become accustomed to the stand and the
experimental conditions, or when the prepara—
tions were administered at the very beginning
of the experiment when the rabbit remained
somewhat excited. In such instances the ad—
ministration of a cholinolytic agent caused
jerking of the paw, attempts to escape the stand,
head movement, and reactions to external stimuli (noise, light, and sound) to disappear immediately. Two to five minutes following admin—
istration of Diphacil, Diasil, Pentaphen, Aprophen, and other substances in the group under
investigation, the state of unrest was succeeded
by general depression. of an intensity which
depended on the dose of the cholinolytic agent.
The rabbit lay quietly in the stand and reacted
feebly to external stimulation.
Simultaneously with the change in the state
and behavior of the animal, characteristic
changes were also observed in the electrical
activity of the brain: slow waves (1 - 2 per sec)
lg) to ”0 v predominated in the EEG. High—
a potentials disappeared entirely or
marke‘y decreased in number (Figs. 1, 2, 3).
These cheapo in electrical activity following
the injection of central cholinolytic agents
could be registered in all portions of the brain
which were under study. The intensity and
duration of theee
depended on the dosage
of the agents admhistened as well as on their
properties. This. similar changes could be
observed following intravenous administration

pm

Motion

frwy

We

of Diphacil. 5 mar/ks.

Wen,

Mammal-oil.

2

mar/ks;

mg/kg; Diaail, 0.6 mg/kg; Methyl—
easu. 0.1 mg/kg; and Diprophen, 15 mg/kg.
other hand, intravenous administration
cholinolytic agents in identical
heee redted in dissimilar changes in the
thalamus. and hypothalad cortex, such
as Diazil and Methylmus. Motions
dis-ll
greater changes in the potentials
of the
structures than of the cortex.
whereas administration of Methyldiphacil and
Diﬂlacil renlted in greater changes in the
cortex. Under the influence of Pentaphen.
1

it.eeet
~
‘

I” h

a“
Meal

129

131’

Aprophen, and to some extent Methyldiphacil,
changes in the EEGs cf the cortex and subcortex were approximately identical (Fig. 3).
Duration of the action of the preparations
under study varied between 2 and 30 hours
depending, apparently, on the dosage and their
physico-chemical properties. The strongest
and most lasting effect was observed after the
administration of Diazil and Methyldiazil, and
the weakest and shortest after administration
of [EM-268 and Diprophen.
Thus, experiments with central cholinolytic
agents showed that they cause general depres—
sion of the animal, a decrease in reﬂex activity
and characteristic changes in the EEG (predominance of slow, high-amplitude potentials).
Comparison of changes, following administra—
tion of central cholinolytic agents, in behavior,
general condition, and EEG, which were oppo—
site to those seen after administration of
cholinomimetics (nicotine and arecoline), per—
mits the conclusion that the EEG changes produced by central cholinolytic agents reﬂect a
state of cerebral depression due to blocking
of the cholinergic systems of the brain.
From our own and published data we knew of
the antagonistic relationships between cholino—
lytic and cholinomimetic agents that have been
demonstrated on peripheral structures as well
as in experiments with conditioned reﬂexes
and with nicotine and arecoline convulsions.
It was of interest to find out whether these
antagonistic relationships are exhibited in the
EEG. A special series of experiments were
therefore carried out for the purpose of investigating the influences of central cholinolytic
agents on the EEG already altered by the administration of cholinomimetics, and vice versa.
It was found that central cholinolytic agents in
definite doses prevent and cancel the action of
cholinomimetics. As shown in Fig. 1, Di—
phacil prevented the action of nicotine administered in a dose which usually produced a pro—
nounced rise in electrical activity. Convulsions
were the external manifestation of the stimulating inﬂuence of nicotine on the brain. Nicotine administered after Diphacil, Methyldiphacil,
Pentaphen. and other preparations never pro—
duced convulsions. Similar results were obtained wiﬂi arecoline: preliminary administra—
tion of Methyldiazil prevented the effect of a
convulsive dose of arecoline (Fig. 2).
Figs. 1 and 2 show that normally both of
these cholinomimetics exerted a pronounced
inﬂuence on the EEG. Their administration
in the same doses against a background of
action by central cholinolytic agents was without effect; the EEG remained the same as after
administration of central cholinolytic agents
Diphacil and Methyldianil.
In these experiments there were also data
indicating a certain preferential antagonism
batman arecoline and Diazil or Methyldiazil
and between nicotine and Diphacil or Methyldiphsoil. Preparations such as Pentaphen and
Aprophen prevent and cancel the action of

-

�arecoline and nicotine equally effectively.

as
application
clinical
for
agents
tion of these
cholinolytics and tranquilizers.

DISC U$ION

REFERENCES

experi—
the
of
the
course
in
clear
It became
experito
an
administration
following
ments that
(Diphacil,
preparations
older
of
animal
mental
as
and
others)
Aprophen.
Pentaphen,
Diazil,

S.V.. In the book: Novye
i
eksperimente
v
sredstva
lekarstvennye

1. ANICHKOV.

and
in
experiments
klinike (New drugs
clinic), 5. L.. 1958.
protivosudo—
Izyskanie
V.S.,
ARTEM'EV,
2.
rozhnykh sredstv metodom eksperimental'anticonvulsive
for
search
(A
noi terapii
agents by the method of experimental
1955;
L.
Dissertation.
,
therapy).
i
atsetilkholina
rol'
Fiziologicheskaia
izyskanie novykh lekarstvennykh of
role
physiological
(The
veshchestv
new
for
search
the
and
acetylcholine
drugs), 1. L.. 1.957.
soveshch.
dokl.
Tez.
GOLIKOV,
S.N.,
3.
i claim.
strukt.
mezhdu
sviazi
p0 probl.
the
of
(Abstracts
veshchestv
lekarstv.
between
Connection
the
on
Conference
13,
of
Drugs),
Action
and
Structure
Tarw, 1956.
dokl.
Tez.
iref.
4. DENISENKO, P.P.,
deiat.
nervn.
vyssh.
probl.
soveshch. p0
Problems
on
Conference
the
of
(Abstracts
of Higher Nervous Activity). No. 1, ‘6,
1... 1958.
1
mom.
5. ZEIMAL‘, E.V., Biuli. eksper.book:
the
in
1955.
42,
1,
39,
med.,
Fiziologicheskaia roi' atsetilkholinai
izyskanie novykh 106m rstvennykh of
veshchestv (The physiological role
new
for
search
the
and
acetylcholine
drugs), 79, 1... 1957.
itoksiFarmakolog.
LIBERMAN,
5.8.,
6.
kolog.. 6, 10, 1956.
bioBiull.
eksper.
A.A.,
MARHEIAN,
7.
1937.
4
119,
(2),
med.,
log.
Farmakoiogicholtm
D.S.,
PASKOV',
8.

GEM-275),
Methyldiazil
—
agents
well as newer
— sigIBM-268
and
(IBM-265),
Methyldiphacil
slow
EEG:
large
the
in
develop
nificant changes
be—
waves
medium
and
waves appear and small
be
may
changes
These
come less numerous.
of cere—
state
of
a
manifestations
regarded as
confirmed
interpretation
an
bral depression,
the
of
experibehavior
and
condition
the
by
mental animals.
The depressant effect of central cholinolytic
nature,
cholinolytic
of
a
is
brain
the
agents on
action
the
cancel
and
prevent
inasmuch as they
(nicotine,
cholinomimetics
and
of acetylcholine
stimu—
a
exert
themselves
which
by
arecoline),
some
is
There
brain.
the
on
influence
lating
already
which
was
antagonism,
preferential

discussed earlier.
more
one
as
serve
hand,
one
on
These data,
synapses
cholinergic
of
existence
the
of
proof
other
the
on
system;
nervous
in the central
the
that
proof
convincing
hand, they provide
not
characteristic
is
central cholinolytic effect

of
an
but
agents,
cholinolytic
individual
only of
of
esters
(complex
entire class of compounds acids) which have
amino alcohols and aromatic
been called "central cholinolytic agents."
and
new
that
hope
to
Our data permit us
found
be
posmay
agents
cholinolytic
powerful
Two
action.
central
sessing a predominantly —- [EM-265 (Methyl—
of the preparations studied
— are
(Methyldiazil)
IBM-275
and
diphacil)
and
tranquilizers
as
trials
undergoing clinical
cholinolytic drugs.

1

CONC LU SION'S

to
used
was
Electroencephalography
1.
of
properties
cholinolytic
establish the central
complex
representing
of
substances
a number
and aromatic
diethylaminoethanol
of
esters

acids.

in
manifested
2. A pronounced antagonism,
central
between
exists
EEG,
their action on the
agents.
cholinomimetic
and
cholinolytic
be—
interdependence
3. There is a definite
of
action
the
and
tween the chemical structure to the degree
cholinolytic agents. According
study
under
the
preparations
of vigor of action,
of diminorder
following
the
in
may be arranged
ishing strength:
Methyldiphacil,
and
Aprophen
phen,
Diprophen.
and
IBM—268,
Preparation
chocentral
the
4. The EEG data regarding
esters
complex
of
series
of
this
ytic action
recommenda—
the
which
permits
investigations

u

kharakteristika alkaloids Mann
antikholinesteraznogv sredstva (Pharma—
alkaloid
of
the
characterizatmn
cological
Disantichoiinesterase),
an
nivaline as
sertation, L.. 1958.
rol'
Fiziologicheskaia
9. SOKOLOVA, LA. .
atsetilkholina i izyskanie novyldl
vennykh veshchestv (The phydol“
role of acetylcholine and the
1957.
122,
L.,
drugs),
new
1
Parmakolog.
10. FEDORCHUK, IU. G..

130

imh
m
'

toksil&lt;olog., 4, 52, 1953.

11. KHARAUZOV,
giperkine zov

N.A., Farmakoterapﬂl
tsentral'nogo proiskhoal-

hyper“

deniia (Pharmacotherapy of
of central origin). Dissertation. L..
1954; Izbiratel'noe vliianie lekar
not.”
tsentral'nuiu
na
veshchestv
nykh
of
influence
(Selective
nuiu sistemy
-_.,
L..
system).
nervous
central
the
on
'

‘

�13. FELDBERG, W., Brit. Med. Bull., 6,
11, 312, 1950.
14. JACOEON, E... Antibiot. Med. a. Clin.
Therapy, 5, 2, 89, 1958.
15. MACINTOSH, F. and P. OBORIN, Abstr.
Comm. XIX Intern. Physiol. Congr.
580, Montreal, 1953.
16. MICHAELIS, M., J.E. FINESINGER,
F. VERSTER and R.W. ERICKSON,
Journ. Pharmacol., III, 2, 169,

THE EFFECTS OF

17.
18.
19.
'

20.

1954.
MILLER, F.R.. Journ. Physiol., 91, 2,
212, 1937.
RIZZOLO, A., Arch. Farmacol., sper.,50, 16, 1929. Tsit. p0: Chem. Abstr.,
24, 1158, 1930.
SCHALLEK, W. and 1LT. SMITH, Journ.
Pharmacol., 104, 3, 291, 1952.
STEWART, W., Brit. Journ. Pharmacol.,
7, 2, 270, 1952.

HYPOCAPNIA ON

THE FUNCTIONAL STATE OF

THE RESPIRATORY CENTER

G.L. FEL’DMAN, Department of Human and Animal Physiology, State University, Rostov-on-Don
(Received January 8, 1960)
METHODS

The question of the physiological mechanism
and biological function of sleep has long interested investigators (Legendre and Pierron,
1913; von Eoonomo, 1925; Hess, 1949; and
others) and has also been the subject of syste—
matic study in experiments conducted at the
Pavlov Laboratory (Pavlov, 1911, 1923, 1935;
Krasnogorskii, 1911; Rozhanskji, 1913;
Petrova, 1941; Asratian, 1953; Anokhin, 1958).
Ole method adopted for exploring the nature of
sleep inhibition and its effect on normal behav—
ior of the brain is that of artificial sleep depri—
vation. Thus, as early as 1891, M.I. Manasseina demonstrated that keeping puppies awake
for a period of 4 to 5 days will lead to death by
degeneration of the nervous tissue of the brain
Legendre and Pierron (1913) described histo—
logical changes of the neurons in the region of
the motor analyzer in the cerebral cortex of
adult dogs deprived of sleep for 7 days. Prolonged sleep deprivation produces severe
derangement of brain function, manifested in a
derangement of the processes regulating biochemical activity (Fedorov and Sikolskaia,
1M1), nervous breakdown (Ukolova, 1959),
and so on. Reports by N. Kleitman (1923),
N. Kleitman and M. Li (1923), Tyler (1955),
Bredlend (1955), and others, describe changes
during experiments in sleep deprivation in

The present study was conducted on 34 ani—
mals (10 kittens between 18 and 30 days old,
13 kittens between 35 and 55 days old, 6 adult
cats, and 5 puppies between 25 and 40 days
old), with electrodes chronically implanted
according to the method described by A. B.
Kogan (1952). The electrodes were implanted
in the region of the motor and visual analyzers
of the cortex and in the subcortical sections of
the brain. Potentials were recorded bipolarly
with an interval between the electrodes of 3 mm
for the surface electrodes, 1.5 mm for the
depth electrodes. Recording was done with a
two—channel electroencephalograph with optical
recording or a four—channel ink-writing electro—
encephalograph. Physiological tests were made
of the effects of a sound stimulus (intermittent
siren twice per second) and a tactile stimulus
(an air current). Parallel with this, and with
the same chronically implanted electrodes,
determinations were made of the thresholds for
direct electrical stimulation of the correspond—
ing points in the brain.
For purposes of comparison, we studied the
intensity relationships for the motor components
of the natural conditioned food reflex (Varukha,
1954) and coordination tests in which we analyzed
the placement of the footprints made by the
animals in walking. Throughout the period of
wakefulness the animals were permitted to move
about without restraint and were constantly
observed under natural light by day and bright
elect‘ric illumination at night. We kept the

humans.

Thus a study of the effects extended wake—
fulness has upon brain function as revealed in
the EEG and other indicators of. the functional
state of the brain is a matter of definite

interest.

131

�may be somewhat wider than the actual
distribution, due to analytical errors and
biological variation in the ratio of single
bone to whole skeleton. It is predicted
that in 1966 the average young child in
the world will have a skeletal concentration of strontium-90 of about 4 MIC of
strontium-90 per gram of calcium; that
10 percent may have a concentration of
8 one; that 1 percent may have a level
of 20 uuc; and that none will have a
level exceeding 80 one of strontium-90
per gram of calcium.
References and Notes
1.

Lamont Geological Observatory Contribution
No. 347. This research is being supported by
the Division of Biology and Medicine of the
U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Many individuals have contributed valuable suggestions
and criticism. These include E. C. Anderson,
C. L. Dunham, M. Eisenbud, H. Hollister.
W. H. Langham, W. F. Libby, J. F. Loutit,
L. Machta, W. G. Marley, N. G. Stewart, H.
L. Volchok, and H. Q. Woodard. We also express our gratitude to the many medical doctors around the world who have assisted in
essential sample procurement. Rieta Slakter is
in charge of the Lamont analytical laboratory.
R. Alley, W. Blake, T. Bott, J. Brokaw, D.

IO

:55»

5.

6.
7.

8.

9.
10.
11.
12.

Harlin, M. Mandel,.._G. Markle, J. Rippey, J.
Sonderburg, and R. lWoehr assisted in various
aspects of the techniCal and secretarial work.
J. L. Kulp, W. R. Eckelmann, A. R. Schulert,
Science 125, 219 (1957).
W. R. Eckelmann, J. L. Kulp, A. R. Schulert,
ibid. 127, 266 (1958).
The two commercial laboratories were Isotopes, Inc., Westwotid, N.J., and Nuclear Sci—
ence and Engineering Corp., Pittsburgh, Pa.
H. L. Volchok, J. L. Kulp, W. R. Eckelmann,
J. Gaetjen, Ann. N;.Y. Acad. Sci. 71, l, 293
(1957); H. L. Volchok and J. L. Kulp, Nucleonicr 13, 49 (1955).
D. L. Thurber, J. L. Kulp, E. J. Hodges, P.
W. Gast, M. Warhpler, Science 128, 256
'
(1958).
A. R. Schulert, E. A. Peets, D. Laszlo, H.
Spencer, M. Charles, J. Samachson, Intern.
]. Appl. Radiation and Isotopes 4, 144 (1959).
A. R. Schulert, E. J. Hodges, E. S. Lenhoff,
J. L. Kulp, Health Phys., in press.
J. L. Kulp and R. Slakter, in preparation.
F. J. Bryant, A. C. Chamberlain, G. S. Spicer,
M. S. W. Webb, Brit. Med. ]. l, 1371 (1958).
Health and Safety Lab. U.S. Atomic Energy
Comm. Publ. No. HASL—42 (16 June 1958).
J. L. Kulp and R. Slakter, Science 128, 86
(1958).
D. V. Booker, F. J. Bryant, A. C. Chamberlain, A. Morgan, G. S. Spicer, Atomic Energy
Research Establ. (G. Brit.) Publ. No. HP/R
2182 (1957); F. J. Bryant, A. C. Chamberlain, A. Morgan, G. S. Spicer, Atomic Energy
Research Establ. (G. Brit.) Publ. No. HP/R
2056 (1957).
H. H. Mitchell, T. S. Hamilton, F. R. Steg~

13.

14.

Isosterism and Competitive
Phenomena in Drugs
q_

A study of structure-activity relationships
in agents acting upon autonomic effector cells
Daniel Bovet

Making use of the considerable means
offered by organic synthesis, many investigators have directed their efforts to
the ﬁeld of therapeutics and have sought
to lay the groundwork for a pharmaceutical chemistry or, better, for a chemical
pharmacology. If such an ambitious program has not yet been fully realized,
nevertheless, during the last ﬁve decades,
one can notice the emergence of a few
basic concepts whose usefulness continues to be conﬁrmed. This is particularly true of the concepts of isosterism
and of competition.
Numerous drugs were ﬁrst derived
from products of biological origin, par-

ticularly the alkaloids. The elucidation
of their structure helped chemists to embark on syntheses of analogous compounds. In this respect cocaine, atropine,

8 MAY 1959

and morphine are good illustrative
examples. The molecules synthesized according to their models exhibited clinically useful anesthetic properties, spasmolytic activity, or pronounced analgesic
effects. In each case, chemical similarity
produces in-some-way-related physiological properties.

Analogous observations have subsequently been gathered in many other
ﬁelds, but it has also become evident
that sometimes very different, even antagonistic, pharmacological properties
may be found in chemically similar
molecules.
Despite the fact that the concept of
“antimetabolite” is based on rather old
experiments, it was deﬁned essentially
in the ﬁeld of “antivitamins”; the work
of Woods (1940) and Fildes (1940) on

15.

16.
17.
18.

gerda, H. W. Bean, J. Biol. Chem. 158, 625
(1945).
H. Spencer, D. Laszlo, M. Brothers, ]. Clin.
Invest. 36, 680 (1957); “Deposition and Retention of Ingested Strontium-90 in the Skeleton" (Washington, D.C., 23 Apr. 1957), committee report (ofﬁcial use only).
C. L. Comar, R. H. Wasserman, M. M. Nold,
Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 92, 859 (1956).
C. L. Comar, I. B. Whitney, F. W. Lengeman, ibid. 88, 232 (1955).
Consumer: Repts. 24, No. 3, 102 (March

1959).
19. J. L. Kulp, A. N. Kaufman, R. S. Slakter,
W. R. Eckelmann, in preparation.
20. Health and Safety Lab. U.S. Atomic Energy
Comm. Publ. No. HASL-5I (10 Nov. 1958).
21. L. Machta and R. J. List, “Stratospheric data
and meteorological interpretations,” paper
presented at a meeting on “ABC—sponsored
Research and Development Related to the
Collection and Classiﬁcation of Atmospheric
Particulates,” held in Minneapolis, Minn.,

Oct. 1958.
22. W. F. Libby, Proceedings symposium on Noxious Eﬂects of Low Level Radiation, Schweizerischen Akadcmie der Medizinischen Witsenschaften 27-29 Mar. 1958, p. 309.
23. R. S. Russell, Nature 182, 834 (1958).
24. Unpublished data from the Lamont Geologi8—9

25.
26.
27.
28.

cal Observatory, Palisades, N.Y.
A. M. Brues, Science 128, 693 (1958).
M. P. Finkel, ibid. 128, 637 (1958).
E. B. Lewis, ibid. 125, 969 (1597).
F. J. Bryant, E. H. Henderson, G. S. Spicer,
M. S. W. Webb, Atomic Energy Research
Establ. (G. Brit.) Rept. No. C/R 2583 (May
1958).

the antisulfonamide component of yeast
and its identiﬁcation as p-aminobenzoic
acid found a large acceptance. The idea
that a compound structurally similar to
one normally present in the organism is
able to interfere with the function of
this metabolite could be applied in many
ways. Its success, especially in enzymology [where, for the ﬁrst time, it was
clearly formulated by Quastel (1925—
1928)], in chemotherapy, in vitaminology, and in endocrinology, obviates a detailed discussion of the underlying physi-L
cochemical and biological principles. Instead, I would like to draw your attention to the importance of studies of
competitive phenomena in pharmacodynamics, especially in the pharmacology
of drugs of the autonomic nervous system. I would like to show how a very
large part of therapeutical chemistry
depends on the relations between many
alkaloids or synthetic compounds and a
few hormones, chemical transmitters,
and products of tissue metabolism of
rather simple chemical structure: epinephrine and norepinephrine, acetylcholine and propionylcholine, histamine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (Table
1).
Dr. Bovet is head of the department of therapeutic chemistry at the Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy. This article is a translation of his
Nobel lecture, presented 11 December 1957, when
he was awarded the Nobel prize for medicine and
physiology for 1957. It is reproduced here with the
permission of the Nobel Foundation. We are indebted to Dr. Ernest Schoffeniels of the department of neurology. College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, for the translation.
1255

�Drugs of the Autonomic Nervous System

The history of the research in this
ﬁeld is one of the most spectacular and
successful chapters in the chemistry and
physiology of the alkaloids and hormones. As far as transmitters of the

sympathetic system are concerned, one
may recall that the isolation of epineph—
rine by Takamine (1901) was preceded
both by empiric application of ephedrine-rich mahuang by the Chinese, and
by the fortuitous discovery of the properties of tetrahydronaphthylamine by
Bamberger (1888). The exact signiﬁcance of norepinephrine has been established only recently, by von Euler
(1946).
In the ﬁeld of parasympathomimetic
agents, the observation of the properties
of muscarine (1811) and the synthesis
of acetylcholine (1866) preceded, by a
century and a half century, respectively,
the discovery of acetylcholine of Loewi
(1921) and its isolation from tissues
(1931). Histamine was synthesized
(1907) shortly before its identiﬁcation
in the products of animal and plant
origin and before Dale and Dudley
(1910) began their well-known studies
of its pharmacological properties.
The recent discovery of 5-hydroxytryptamine (Rapport, 1949) is the culmination of the work of Erspamer on
enteramine isolated from enterochromaﬂin cells (1937—1952) and the work
of Rapport, Green, and Page (1947—
1948) on the vasoconstrictor factor of
serum, serotonin.
The relationship between epinephrine,

(CH2)

/COO.CH2.CH2.N(CH3)31

“\COO.CH2CH2N(CH3)3

1

£5
E
I34
8

0- 3

7

a%

2
w
.=‘
-

3
g

.

0
Fig.

n=12345
Curarizing effect of choline esters
8

1.

and dicarboxylic aliphate acids with normal chains. Curarizing activity was established in rabbits by measuring the “head
dro P ” dose of the various compounds
given intravenously. Curarizing activity
reaches a maximum with succinylcholine
and decreases with higher homologues of
the series. [Bovet, Bovet-Nitti, Guarino,
Longo, and Marotta, 1939]
1256

Table 1. Drugs with a competitive action with respect to epinephrine, acetylcholine,
histamine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine.
Adrenaline
(noradrenaline)
H

\

CH0H.CH2rN/

,

CH

0H

Hydroxytrypt amine

.
.
Histamine

Acetylcholine
CH

3

K
CH3.COO.CH2.GH2.N\

6213

CH/

H

H

\\N—c

CH3

’H

NH-CH
.

OH

CH

2.

CH

2.

H-

cHz.CHz.N\H

N/

\H

H

Sympatholytic
Antihistaminics :
Parasympatholytic
Antihydroxytryptaagents :
agents :
.mines
”
Ergotamine
929 F
Atropine (spasmolytic
Yohimbine
2339 R.P. (Antergen)
agents )
Benzodioxane Curares:
Pyrilamine
d-Tubocurarine
(933 F)
Diphenhydramine
Dibenamine
Gallamine
Antazoline
Phentolamine
Decamethonium
Promethazine
Succinylcholine
Ganglioplegic agent:
Hexamethonium
Central ganglioplegic
agents:
Antiparkinson agents
Antiphobic agents
_

,

tissue acetylcholine, and the nervous
system was recognized early. In 1904,
Elliot, struck by the similarity existing
between the pharmacological action of
epinephrine and the effect of stimulating
the sympathetic system, proposed the
hypothesis according to which epineph-

rine is released from sympathetic nerve
endings and transmits the impulse from
nerve cell to smooth muscle ﬁber.
Wieland in 1912 and Le Heux in 1919
tried to demonstrate that choline and
acetylcholine were local hormones. Their
hypothesis, we know, was successfully
developed by Loewi, Dale, Cannon, and
Bacq, whose experiments established the
concept of chemical transmitters. The
hypothesis of chemical transmission by
acetylcholine ﬁrst proposed for viscera
innervated by the parasympathetic system was later extended by Dale, Feldberg, and Vogt (1936) to the neuromuscular junction. Recent investigations on
the physiology of the end plate have, in
sum, conﬁrmed this mechanism. The reaction between acetylcholine and its receptor located at the postsynaptic mem—
brane can now be integrated within the
framework of electrophysiological ﬁndings, particularly those demonstrating
electrical nonexcitability of this membrane and its great sensitivity to the
transmitter (Kuﬂler, 1948; Castillo and
Katz, 1956).
To turn now to substances antagonizing these various hormones and transmitters, models for the synthesis of
adrenergic and cholinergic blocking
agents were furnished by compounds of
biological origin, such as ergotoxine,

atropine, and curare. The antihistaminics were studied later and represent syn- '
thetic products of completely original
design.

In practice, these drugs have been

widely used in the symptomatic treatment of dysfunction of organs which are
dependent on the activity of the autonomic nervous system: heart, blood vessels, bronchi, gastrointestinal tract, and
uterus. The antagonists of epinephrine
found their major application in the
treatment of vascular disorders and hypertension. The antagonists of acetylcholine are used primarily as spasmolytic, mydriatic, and muscle-relaxing
Table 2. Structural relations between
and
sympathomimetic
Sympatholytic
agents. [Raymond-Hamet, 1937; Bovet
and Simon, 1936; Druey, 1936; Bovet,
de Lestrange, and Fourneau, 1942; de
Beer and Fassett, 1938; Hartmann and
Isler, 1939; Gross, Tripod, and Meier,
1951]

SYMPA'HOMIMEIIC
AGEN’S

/’
H0
\0H

SYMPAYNOlVYIC
AGENYS

CHOHCHZNHCHg

ACHECHENHE

CH2CH2N(C2H5)2

V
AC CH2CH2NHCH3
\v

OCHZCH2N(C2H5)2

OH

ANHCHECHzNH:

N&lt;

V

CH 2

mm
L

c
(2115).?

93*”

HUM

HOMNH
CH3

NCH3

o/\I~1chzc{r\m-&lt;':H2

CHJDV
OCH3

\N—CH;

N

CH2 C&lt;NH—(IIH2

\N—CHg

CH3

0H

SCIENCE, VOL.

129

�agents. The antihistaminics are most
useful in the treatment of urticaria, rhinitis, asthma, and other allergic diseases.
For speciﬁc illustrations, I shall use
examples from three different pharmacological groups. For the epinephrine
group, I will consider ergotamine; for
the antiacetylcholine group, curare; and
for histamine, I will consider the syn—

thetic antihistaminics.

“ifssﬁm "
,

'"

CH?
C3

Synthetic Sympatholytic and
Ergotamine-Like Compounds
Sympatholytic drugs form a group
characterized by common pharmacological properties. They act as competitors—or blocking agents, in AngloSaxon terminology—by opposing the
effects of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Most characteristically, they block
the hypertension and vasoconstriction
produced by epinephrine.
As is often the case, various drugs of
this class were introduced empirically
into therapeutics long before their pharmacological actions were established. As
long ago as 1909, Froelich noticed that
animals pretreated with small doses of
the dextrorotatory isomer of epinephrine
became resistant to the effects of the
natural isomer. Today we explain this
observation as resulting from a partial
block of the receptors by a pharmacologically much less active enantiomorph
of the compound. Later Loewe (1927),
Kiilz (1936), and Raymond-Hamet
(1937) described N-alkyl derivatives of
phenylethylamine with sympatholytic
properties; analogous properties were
described in the phenoxyethylamine
series (Anan, 1930; Levy and Ditz, 1933;
Bovet and Maderni, 1933; Bovet, Simon
and Druey, 1937), the phenylethylenediamine series (Bovet, de Lestrange,
and J. P. Fourneau, 1942), the isoquinoline series (Hjort, de Beer and Fassett,
1938), and the phenylaminoethylimidazoline series (Meier and M'Liller, 1939;
Hartmann and Isler, 1939). In each of
these groups the structural similarities
between the antagonistic molecules with
either sympathomimetic or sympatholytic properties are evident (Table 2);
the degree of substitution on the amine,
the suppression or displacement of the
phenolic function, the closing of a ring,
are sufficient to reverse the pharmacological action. It is very important to
notice that while the distance betWeen
the amine function and the aromatic
ring remains constant in both sympathomimetic and sympatholytic agents, the
inhibitory 'molecule has always, in con:
8 MAY 1959

{gags seems i} {We casing mag,
Fig. 2. Pachycurares. (Left) d-Tubocura-

rine; (above) gallamine.

Table 3. Classiﬁcation of the main groups of sympathomimetic and sympatholytic agents.

©-c-c—N

©—o-c—c—N

©mc-c-n

Phenylethylamines

Phenoxyethylamines

Phenylethylene diamines

Tiiii

r

i

Sympathomimetic agents
Phenolic derivatives of
Phenylethylenediamine and
Epinephrine
its phenolic derivatives
Phenylethylamines and their phenoxyethylamine
phenolic derivatives
Sympatholytic agents (aromatic series)
N-Diethyl-N’-propyl-N’N-Diethylphenylethylamine N-Diethylphenoxyethylamine
phenylethylenediamine
Dibenamine
Dibenzyline
Tetrahydronaphthylamines,
N-substituted
Sympat/tolytic agents (heterocyclic series)
N -MethyltetrahydroBenzodioxane:
Phenylpiperazine
Phentolamine
isoquinoline
Prosympal
Benzylimidazoline
Piperoxan
Sympatholytic alkaloids
Yohimbine
Ergot alkaloids

Table 4. Structural relations between sympathomimetic and sympatholytic agents: from
epinephrine to ergotamine. [Marini-Bettolo, Chiavarelli and Landi, Vittory, 1950—1953;
Bovet, Bovet-Nitti, Virno, Longo, Marotta, and Sollero, 1953]
[NH _ CH3

CHOH-CHZ

NH 2

,NH2

/
(31+2&lt;:H2

NH2

GHz'ct'
0H3

OH
OH

Adrenaline

Phenylethylamine

Amphetamine

Tetrahydronaphtylamine
CH30H‘I3H2

IcorchH5

CH3 _

843 LS

alibi-c

co

C H2 -0H
\Nz—CH

2 H 5-»

3

9|

6 1.5.

_

CIH2

CH\ N/CHZ
c,o\lI
NH—

N\
COG
N‘

X30

ERGOTAMINE
1257

�The most active natural and synthetic

tradistinction to the excitatory one, an
amino group substituted by more, and
heavier, radicals. Generally the inhibitory molecules also have a more stable
structure and a higher molecular weight.

sympatholytic compounds, whose effectiveness is sufﬁcient to permit their use
in the clinic, are generally polycyclic or
heterocyclic, with structures analogous

Table 5. Investigations of synthetic oxytocic agents, derived from phenylglycinamide.
[Bovet-Nitti, 1952, 1954]
CH

CH

3

3

NH- CH- CHZOH
co-

CONH-CIZHCHZOH

CH2' CH2
N—

CH3
CZ H5
NHCOCH2N&lt;

c2*‘5

8331.8.

Ergometrine

62'

"
s

CZ H5

NHCOCH2 N

1048

I

€sz

1.3.

,6sz
NHCOCHZN.

H
0sz‘N- co- CHz-N c
’2 5

|062

|058I.S.

1.5.

Table 6. Natural and synthetic curares: d-tubocurarine (King, 1935; Wintersteiner and
Dutcher, 1943); 3381 RF. (Bovet, Courvoisier, Duclos, and Horclois, 1946) ; gallamine
(Bovet, Depierre, and de Lestrange, 1947) ; succinylcholine (Bovet, Bovet-Nitti, Longo,
and Marotta, 1949; Fusco, Palazzo, Chiavarelli, and Kniisli, 1949).

“3‘0
&lt;300 H 3

‘

E"?

06H;
on

/

;..
C2H5

\

/"x

I

1‘

————©—o

O—(CH2)5-—-0

I °2H5

3381 R.P.

d-Tubocurarine

'

O‘CHZ-CHZ'N(CZH5)3I '

on 2coocnzc H2N(CH3)BC! -

,

.

o-cwcwmcm-I'
2
2. 253
or 0 Hz- CH2*N(CZH5)3'I

]

_

.

CHz-COOCHZCH2N(CH3)3C!‘

Succinylcholine

Gallamine

Table
Subject
Mammals
Birds
Amphibians
(rectus
abdominis)
1258

7.

Pharmacodynamic properties of synthetic curares.

Pachycurares
(competing agents) :
tubocurarine, gallamine

Curarization
Curarization
Antagonism to acetylcholine

Leptocurares
(depolarizing agents) :
succinylcholine, decamethonium

Curarization (muscular ﬁbrillation)
Contracture followed by curarization
Acetylcholinic contracture

to the above-mentioned compounds despite their complexity. Benzylimidazoline
(Meier and Miiller, 1939) and dibenamine (Nickerson and Goodman, 1947)
are related to the phenylethylamines;

the aminomethyl-benzodioxanes (Fourneau and Bovet, 1933), to the phenoxyethylamines; and phentolamine (Gross,
Tripod, and Meier, 1951) to phenylethylenediamine derivatives (Table 3).
Studies conducted at the Istituto Superiore di Sanita by Marini-Bettolo and
Chiavarelli, on the chemical aspects, and
by F. Bovet-Nitti, Longo, Marotta, and
Guarino on the pharmacological aspects,
illustrate the usefulness of the concepts
of isosterism and of competition in this
kind of investigation.
When the isolation and structural determination of the ergot alkaloids was
achievedwresearches for which we are
largely indebted to Stoll and Jacobs——
much work was done to prepare derivatives by partial or total synthesis; thus,
dehydrogenated derivatives (Rothlin,
1947) and oxytocic derivatives closely
related to ergometrine (Rothlin, 1947)
were prepared, and the diethylamide of
lysergic acid with hallucinogenic properties was discovered (Stoll). Since we
proposed to investigate the structureactivity relationships of ergotamine, we
used as our working hypothesis the con—
cept relating structure to antagonistic
action.
At ﬁrst sight, the structure of the
ergot alkaloids seems to be very different from that of epinephrine or of sympathomimetic derivatives of the phenylethylamine series. Nevertheless, since
the skeleton of B-tetrahydronaphthylamine (2-aminotetralin) can be recognized in'the structure of lysergic acid,
we decided to study compounds of this
group (Table 4).
Pharmacological tests with derivatives
of relatively simple structure demonstrated the sympatholytic activity of
2-diethylaminotetralin (843 1.5.). Studies with more complex molecules, in
particular the amide and amine derivatives of 2-tetralin, are a new step in the
attempt to reproduce the essential portion of the lysergic acid skeleton. Using
molecules of increasing complexity, one
may go by successive stages from phenylethylamine to tetrahydronaphthylamine
or to N-(2-tetra1yl) -N-methyl-N’-ethylB-alaninamide (916 LS.) and the ergot
alkaloids, with a resulting progressive
diminution at each stage of sympathomimetic properties and the appearance
of sympatholytic properties.
Oxytocic activity was observed in a
large number of synthetic derivatives,
SCIENCE, VOL. 129

�and this class of compounds seems very
broad compared to that of adrenolytic
substances (Table 5). In the course of
experiments performed on rabbit uterus,
isolated or in situ, several derivatives of
aminotetralin and of aniline and even
some aliphatic compounds showed strong
activity. We may single out such examples as N,N-diethyl-N’- ( 2-tetralyl ) glycinamide (621 I.S.); N,N-diethyl-N’-3( 1048
4-dimethylphenylglycinamide
LS.) ; and N,N,N’,N’tetraethylglycinamide (1062 LS.) (Bovet-Nitti, 1953).
The main difﬁculty, apparently encountered also by other investigators,
was the lack of parallelism between effects observed in laboratory animals
and in man. Generally speaking, a satisfactory solution to the problem of syn—
thetic oxytocies has not yet been reached,
and the question is still under study.
Antagonists of Acetylcholine:
Synthetic Curares

The problem of competitive agents
that antagonize acetylcholine activity is
rather complex, due to the multiple
functions of this transmitter. Acetylcholine is the chemical transmitter in viscera innervated by the parasympathetic
system; it has a role at the neuromuscu—
lar junction, and it is liberated in ganglia

during the passage of a nerve impulse.
A surprising fact, which has been proﬁtably exploited in pharmacological investigations of competitive agents, is that
compounds antagonizing acetylcholine
differ according to the site of action of
the local hormone. Thus, atropine and
benzoylcholine neutralize the muscarinic effects of acetylcholine on cardiac
receptors, on the intestine, or on secretions; tetraethylammonium iodide or hexamethonium block the nicotinic action of
acetylcholine on sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia. Finally, curares are
speciﬁc antagonists of acetylcholine in
striated muscle. With respect to the
structure of antagonists, synthetic curares
furnish us with a succession of examples
comparable to those we have reviewed in
the sympatholyticgroup. These investigations were begun in 1946, after King’s
elucidation, in 1935, of the structure of
one of the physiologically active constituents of Amazonian curares, and
after the introduction by Grifﬁth and
Cullen in 1942 of the chemically pure
alkaloid as an adjuvant in anethesia.
d-Tubocurarine, which is extracted
from a menispermum, Chondodendron
tomentosum, is found in curares prepared by the natives of the Upper Ama8 MAY 1959

,

emcageugcagcagefcam

Mammengmécm

{1:39}

CHQCG B Ci‘iéci‘ig

‘
’

R;C8313

(CH333NCHgCRgu C0 CHg

Fig. 3. Leptocurares. (Left) Decamethonium; (right) succinylcholine.
zon. It is an alkaloid of the group
bis ( benzyltetrahydroisoquinoline) , whose
molecule has two quaternary ammonium

ity, and this was also true for polyphenol
ethers and aromatic esters. The latest
investigations on the path to ultimate
simpliﬁcation are concerned’ with the
activity of aliphatic derivatives.
In England, Barlow and Ing and
Paton and Zaimis (1948) reported extremely interesting observations on the
curare-like effect of decamethylene—w-

functions.
In research done with our colleagues,
Viaud, Horclois, and de Lestrange, we
ﬁrst looked for molecules structurally
close to the selected model. By successive
transformations, we were able to synthesize relatively simple derivatives with
analogous properties (Table 6). From
a series of new compounds with two
quinolinic rings bearing quaternary ammonium functions, we ﬁrst selected the
diiodoethylate of 8’ ,8’ ’ -diquinolyloxy1,5-pentane (3381 R.P.). This was the
ﬁrst synthetic compound with curarelike action in mammals showing a speciﬁcity comparable to that of natural
alkaloids isolated from curare (1946).
It was then found that aminophenol
derivatives which have neither quinoline
nor isoquinoline rings had similar activ-

bis-trimethylammonium hydrate (decamethonium). In our Laboratory of
Therapeutical Chemistry at the Istituto
Superiore di Sanita, the curare-like action of succinylcholine was ﬁrst recognized. This compound was synthesized
by Hunt in 1911.
The number and variety of compounds with curare-like action, the relative simplicity of their mode of action,
and the possibility of precise pharmacological assay permitted a careful study
of structure-activity relationships of synthetic curares.

Solveni front

D

Iodine

Carboxylic reagent
Bromothymol blue

0
000

@%s
+

60

O

Enzymic hydrolysis

(5%)

01

cm.{

R;

1

o

O

o

@

@s....,...ho....

@
@
@
®
+

a

2

§ §

Choline

Succinylmonocholine
Succinate

3
20

Control

Non-enzymic
hydrolysis (96)

Fig. 4. Chromatograms of (a to e) succinlycholine at various stages of enzymic hydrolysis;
(f) a mixture of succinylcholine and its products of hydrolysis; (g) 0.1 mg of succinylcholine after nonenzymic hydrolysis. [Whittaker and Wijesundera, 1952]
1259

�Fig. 5. Comparison between curarizing effects of d-tubocurarine (left) and of succinylcholine (right) given intravenously as a single
fol—
muscle
of
the
Contraction
anesthesia.
gastrocnemius
chloralose
under
(First
line)
the
dog,
continuous
perfusion on
injection or by
lowing the.rhythmic stimulation of the sciatic nerve; (second line) control of the speed of injection; (third line) blood pressure. The
record shows clearly the difference between the duration of neuromuscular paralysis following a single injection of succinylcholine
(370 1.8., 0.05 mg/kg) and of d-tubocurarine (0.1 mg/kg). Also, on comparing the effect of a single injection of d—tubocurarine with
continuous perfusion of succinylcholine (initial injection of 0.05 mg followed by repeated injection of 0.0062 mg at each signal), one
sees that, for the duration of subtotal and reasonably uniform eurarization (about 80 percent, for 20 minutes), the reversibility of the
effect is quick (about 10 minutes) after infusion of succinylcholine while it is slowly progressive (about 50 minutes) after injection of
d-tubocurarine. [Reuse, 1953]

I will mention only two important
factors which inﬂuence the activity of
bis-quaternary derivatives: the distance
between the quaternary ammonium
groups and the massiveness of the molecule.
The ﬁrst factor is illustrated by comparison of polymethylene-bis-trimethylammonium derivatives (Barlow and Ing;
Paton and Zaimis, 1948) as well as of
aliphatic diesters of choline (Bovet,
Bovet-Nitti, Guarino, Longo and Marotta, 1949) (Fig. 1).
Careful pharmacological study showed
that the action of new synthetic derivatives was sometimes quite different from
that of the natural alkaloids.
The differences between the action of
decamethonium iodide and succinylcholine iodide on the one hand and the

action of d-tubocurarine and of the tri—
iodethylate of gallamine on the other
were carefully studied by Paton and
Zaimis, Brown and Dias and in our own
laboratory. The British authors have proposed calling these two groups depolarizing agents and competitive curares. We
proposed designating decamethonium
and succinylcholine as leptocurares, and
tubocurarine and gallamine as pachycurares (Figs. 2 and 3; Table 7). The
advantage of our nomenclature lies in
the fact that it does not presume the
mechanism of action. The main differ—
ence between the pharmacodynamic effects produced by the two types of
curares is determined by the responses of
amphibian and bird muscles. In birds,
the pachycurares are typical curarizing
agents, while leptoeurares induce con-

ESHWEH
H
.

CH,

C“Cf~iLCHNH

};

fag;

\g‘fsfmwx
‘

as?
N
1260

y
2‘

ecu,
'2

CHECHEMCHM

Fig. 6. (Left, top) Histamine; (left, bottom) pyridylethylamine; (above) pyrilamine.

tracture that is followed by eurarization.
In mammals the differences between
the two groups are less sharp. The responses of muscle from different species
or of different muscles from a single
species are not always comparable. Also,
intermediary steps seem to exist between
depolarization and curare competition.
The distinction between the groups,
though relative with respect to the
mechanism of action and the type of
preparation used, are, nevertheless, useful if we want to compare relations between chemical structure and pharmacological activity.
Clinically, the most important factor
in classiﬁcation of curares is duration of
effect. In this respect, the introduction
of a short-acting curare, particularly succinylcholine, is an important step forward. The relative ease with which suc—
cinylcholine is hydrolyzed by pseudocholinesterase and the very low toxicity
of the products choline and succinic acid
account for the brevity of action and the
remarkable tolerance of the organism for
this curare (Fig. 4; Table 8).
The ﬁrst clinical observations concerning short-acting curares were published
by Valdoni (1949) and Scurr (1951)
and deal with suxethonium. The introduction of succinylcholine into anesthesiology was ﬁrst proposed in Sweden, by
Thesleff (1951), Holmberg and Thesleff
( 1951), Tammelin and Low (1951 ) , and
von Dardel (1951), and in Austria, by
Briicke et al. (1951), Mayrhofer and
Hassfurther (1951), and Holzer (1951).
In the light of these various investigations, one may today recognize two
methods of using succinylcholine: single
injection when very short action is required (as for endoscopy or electroSCIENCE, VOL.

129

�Table 8. Hydrolytic products of succinylcholine.

(CHgaN‘CiECi-izococ Hacib c OOCHZC HZN ’(c 1493.1’

-Succiny|choline
1'.

(CH3)?

CHZCHZOCOCHZCI‘ECOOH + OHCHZCHZN (cl-1‘3)3

I

Choline

Succinylmonoct‘oline

l
lrl(.7H3)3N CH2 CH 2OH+ HOOCCHZCHZCOOH

Succinic acid

Choline

shock) or continuous infusion in surgical procedures of long duration.
Two recordings from a study in our
laboratory demonstrate results obtained
with the two types of application. They
show the superiority of continuous infusion of short-acting curares over the
classical technique (Fig. 5).

Antihistamines

The last example I will use to illus—
trate the concept of competition is concerned with compounds that antagonize
the third local hormone, histamine. This

particularly rich ﬁeld since the usefulness of these compounds has stimulated a great many investigations within
a very few years. In 1937, in Fourneau’s
laboratory, we began—A. M. Staub and
I—to look for compounds antagonistic
to histamine. Considering the number of
features that histamine, acetylcholine,
and epinephrine have in common, we
looked for antagonism comparable to
that exhibited by sympatholytic compounds toward epinephrine and by parasympatholytic compounds toward acetylcholine. We obtained the ﬁrst positive
results in 1939 with thymoxyethyldiethylamine (929 F). Our experimental work
was then directed toward deﬁning criteria for antihistaminic activity. Staub
(1939) extended her observations to
phenylethylenediamine derivatives. In
1942, the syntheses by Mosnier, the
pharmacodynamic studies of Halpern,
and the ﬁrst therapeutic results of Cuilleret, Thiers, Gaté, Celice, Perrault,
Decourt, and Durel with dimethylaminoethylbenzylaniline, or Antergan,
deﬁnitively established interest in compounds of this group. The role played
by histamine in many allergic affections
assures a broad area of clinical application of these compounds. After the pio—
neers (Maderni, de Lestrange, and
Benoit in Fourneau’s laboratory in Paris;
is a

Table 9. Principal groups of synthetic antihistaminics: 929 F (Bovet and Staub, 1937) ;
Antergan (Halpern, 1942); antazoline (Meier and Bucher, 1946); diphenhydramine
(Loew, Kaiser, and Moore, 1945); promethazine (Halpern and Ducrot, 1946); chlorphenamine (Tislow, La Belle, et al., 1949) ; pyrilamine (Bovet, Horclois, Walther, and
Fournel, 1944); tripelennamine (Mayer, Huttrer, and Scholz, 1945) ; thonzylamine
(Reinhard and Scudi, 1947).
Antihistaminics related to:
Sympatholytic agents
onQ

[OHS

CH

ocnac H2N(62H5)2
CH3

929F

”Q
CH

‘0H 2 0H 2 Maria)

2

Antergon

Q

Spasmolytic agents

0

\ZCH CH

Diphanhydramine

O

cuzcnmcusiz

N

\ N-CH2
_

Antozoiine
8

MAY 1959

:EH GHZCH2N(CH3)2

Chlorphenamino

2N(CH3)

Pyrilamine

N‘cnacnzmchu

3

CH—

@001

ECHocH ZCHZNKSH 3’2

Promethazine

\C

Histamine

Tripulennominc

ﬂZOOCHS
N/

\ZCHZCHZNCHa)

Thonzylamino

Table 10. Structural relations between
histamine and antihistamines. [Walter,
Hunt, and F osbinder, 1941; Nieman and
Hays, 1942; Bovet and Walthert, 1943]
NH

/\
/

/

’I

CH2 CH2 NHZ
,

I,

HISTAMINE
Histamine action

2.

N

I

Antihistamine action

HQ":

CH2 CHZN:

(/\n-CH2.GH2.NHZO
KEV)

/J

Nona

\

,/&lt;CH 2 .0H 2 .NH 2

\

"[0142

A"

(7N1ii
KN

6H2

ii;

N’0
2 ‘01::

CH

0

o

\N

~

/-CH2CH2. NH2

“3

+

K

I

R

N:
N

[CH3
CH2.CH .N\

*

CH%

Viaud, Horclois, Mosnier, and Charpentier in French industry; Hartman
and Hofman in Switzerland; Rieveschl,
Scholz, Huttrer, and Roblin in the
United States; Cavallini in Italy), about
500 chemists synthesized, in less than
ten years, more than 5000 compounds in
the antihistaminic group.
Pharmacologists were easily able to
recognize the competitive nature of the
antagonism exerted by these antihistaminics toward histamine. Chemists, however, could not perceive any relation
between the structure of antihistaminics
and histamine which logically might
explain such activity, nor could they ﬁnd
a relationship among the various active
compounds. It was therefore impossible
to escape the conclusion that most of the
results were rather empirical.
From the pharmacological viewpoint,
it was possible to distinguish three groups
of substances (see Table 9) with antihistaminic action and relate them to (i) the
sympatholytic group; (ii) the parasympatholytic-sympatholytic group; and (iii)
histamine itself.
To the ﬁrst group belong the phenolic
esters (929 F) and the phenylethylene—
diamine derivatives (1571 F) studied at
the Pasteur Institute, Halpern’s Antergan, and the antazoline of Meier and
Bucher. The compounds of the second
group, from a chemical point of view,
have more homogeneous structures, in
1261

�common with atropine-like drugs and
other spasmolytics; some of these are, in
fact, spasmolytic as well as antihistaminic (diphenhydramine). In derivatives of a-aminopyridine, which form
the third group, the antihistaminic action
is more speciﬁc and almost free of secondary effects. It is interesting to note
in this group the isosteric reactions which
account for the pharmacological activity. Walter et al. (1941) and Niemann
and Hays (1942) have shown that
a-pyridylethylamine derivatives have histamine-like activity, and that a fundamental difference exists between a-, [3-,
and y-substituted pyridines in this
respect. In this case, the analogy of
structure which is not evident between
histamine and pyrilamine (Neo-Antergan) may be seen between the groups
a-pyridylethylamine and (it-pyridine ethylenediamine (Table 10, Fig. 6). A
typical compound from this group is
pyrilamine (see Fig. 7), but many other
synthetic compounds of similar design
have also proved to be active.

Central Action of Transmitters
The compounds considered so far do
not exhaust the ranks of competitive
agents. Pharmacologists are to some extent les enfants terrible: of physiology.
They did not wait for the battle of the
neuromuscular junction to be won before
engaging in a more difﬁcult encounter.
They proposed that the available evidence suggested the action of a chemical
transmitter in the central nervous system, exactly as in the autonomic nervous
system.
Analyzing the collective results from
various laboratories, Feldberg (1950)
concluded that the theory ascribing a
transmitter role to acetylcholine in the
central nervous system was the only one
able to offer convincing and satisfactory
interpretations. Even if intervention of

noncholinergic chemical transmitters in
the central nervous system is not excluded, we must admit that our knowledge about the probable roles of norepinephrine, epinephrine, histamine, and
5-hydroxytryptamine is still quite incomplete.
The physiological role of the reticular
formation in the brain stem has been
clearly deﬁned by Moruzzi and Magoun
(1949). In the last few years, a considerable number of investigations have
shown that compounds affecting the autonomic nervous system also affected this
formation.
Paradoxically enough, cholinergic as
1262

HISTAMINE

0.001

cm/H 0
20

.mm/Hg
200
100

0

15

PYRILAMINE

HISTAMINE

1.0

0.001

“

j

1

V.

10

5

0

0

‘_3lOsec

Fig. 7. Antagonistic action of pyrilamine with respect to the vasodilating effects of histamine in cerebral circulation. The subject was a dog under chloralose anesthesia. (A)
Blood pressure, femoral artery (mm-Hg); (V1) pressure recorded through a catheter
introduced in a centrifugal direction into the external maxillary vein (mm-H20) ; (V2)
pressure in the internal maxillary vein (mm-H20). Injection was made into the saphenous vein; dosages are given in milligrams per kilogram. [Virno, Gertner and Bovet, 1956]

well as adrenergic substances affect the
electrical activity of the cortex in the
same way that direct electrical stimulation of the reticular formation does.
Under well-deﬁned experimental conditions, acetylcholine (Bonnet and Bremcr,
1937) and epinephrine itself (Bonvallet,
Dell, and Hietzel, 1954) provoke a
transient activation in the electroencephalogram. The administration of either
an anticholinesterase (eserine, diisopropyl ﬂuorophosphate) or of amphetamine
(Bradley and Elkcs, 1953) produces an
intense and prolonged desynchronization.
From a strictly pharmacological viewpoint, the major interest in this type of
investigation stems from the similarity
in observed antagonisms between various
groups of drugs in the central nervous
system and in viscera innervated by the
autonomic nervous system.

As early as 1947 we suggested that in

extrapyramidal syndromes some relation
might exist between the central, “antiparkinson,” effect of certain tertiary
amines and their ganglioplegic properties in peripheral ganglia (Sigwald and
Bovet; Dumont; 1947).
“Antiparkinson” drugs form a relatively homogeneous group comprising
diethazine (Diparcol), isothazine (Parsidol), caramiphen (Parpanit), and trihexyphenidyl (Artane), as well as some
antihistaminics (diphenliydramine and
promethazine).
Electroencephalographic studies (Fig.
8) have shown that three groups of compounds produce an electroencephalogram similar to that recorded during
sleep: the parasympatholytics (scopolamine and atropine), the central ganglio—
plegic or “antiparkinson” drugs (Table
11), and the neuroleptics (chlorproma-

w;

mwgwmmwww

W
MWMvM

51mm

‘

.

-..,: p‘,

51%; g‘ﬁ‘kﬁﬁg‘ﬁ’?‘ “if“?'9““(high ‘) K

$3.)wa

ai’zfiig'f$6,133?3.25%

“

if:

(3:1‘331“

ii

4,
,.

“‘

;.§l(¢t

{brave-112m}?

Fig. 8. Antagonistic action of diethazine against convulsive patterns caused by nicotine
on the electroencephalogram of curarized rabbit. (A) Blocking reaction after acoustic
stimulation (black line). (B) Convulsive seizure by nicotine (2 mg/kg) in normal animal. (C) After injection of diethazine (5 mg/kg) a second injection of nicotine no longer
produced the electrical changes observed previously. and the acoustic stimulus fails to
produce the blocking reaction. [Longo and Bovet, 1952]
SCIENCE, VOL. 129

�zine, reserpine). These also antagonize
the cortical reaction elicited by external
stimuli (stress) or by desynchronizing
agents (eserine and amphetamine) (Bovet and Longo, 1956). The effect of
such synchronizing agents may, as a ﬁrst
approximation, be localized in the reticular formation and thus be comparable to the importance of chemical
transmitters at this level.
Many observations suggest that speciﬁc receptors fOr epinephrine, acetyl-

choline, and histamine are speciﬁc proteins with a structural conﬁguration
complementary to that of the transmitter. This concept was ﬁrst proposed
by Fischer, who illustrated it with the
now famous model of key and lock.
his mechanism has been invoked to
explain observations in physiological and
chemical studies of taste and smell. Recently, Landsteiner and Pauling applied
this idea of “complementary conﬁguration” in the ﬁeld of immunological reactions.
At this point it would not be possible
to consider the various aspects of reactions between chemical transmitters, inhibitors, and receptor proteins without
taking more space than is available.
The particularly simple case of binding acetylcholine with cholinesterase has
been studied by Nachmansohn (1953—
1954) and Wilson (1954). They consider acetylcholine to be attached at two
points, one electronegative and the other
elcctropositive, and have drawn valid
conclusions with respect not only to
various anticholinesterases but also to a
new group of drugs that reactivate the
phosphorylated enzyme.
If I cared to develop the extensive
areas covered in this article I could include other topics and point out that
different groups of compounds affect the
metabolism of mediators because they
are precursors or because they inhibit
synthesis, slow down or accelerate liberation, or interfere with destruction. In
every phase, investigations have been
successful and the results appear to be
very promising.

Conclusion

The composite picture I have tried to
present, at the risk of relating many al—
ready well-known facts, appears, despite
inevitable gaps, very certain. If, in concluding, we rapidly retrace our path, we
will see that in covering the vast ﬁeld
of pharmacology, the structures of a
small group of remarkably simple biogenic amines have led us, like the thread
8 MAY 1959

Table 11. Central ganglioplegic agents: diphenhydramine (Loew, Kaiser, and Moore,
1945) ; diethazine (Sigwald, Bovet, and Dumont, 1946; Bovet, Fournel, and Charpentier,
1947); caramiphen (Domenjoz, 1946; Griinthal, 1946); trihexyphenidyl (Doshay and
Constable, 1949).

/ \

/ \
CH-O-CHz-CH2~N(GH3)2

Diphenhydramine (Benadryl)

-GO'O‘ OHZ'GHZ'N(02H5)2

Caramiphen

&lt;// \\&gt;
S

N'CH2'CH2N(02H5)2

:COH'CHZCHZN

&gt;

Diethazine

Trihexyphenidyl

of Ariadne, through the labyrinth of very

a name always well-known and sometimes very close to us.
The future of pharmacodynamics is,
nevertheless, so rich and promising, and

diverse physiological actions and chemical structures.
It has been said that the art of the
orator is to speak about what he knows
and to hide his ignorance. I do not feel
any need to resort to such an artiﬁce in
presenting the current picture of the
chemical pharmacology, because it is, in
ﬁnal analysis, only a kind of “natural
history” and classiﬁcation of organic
molecules.
I would say that the results obtained
so far give rise to optimism because they
let us catch a glimpse of the pharmacology to come as a well-ordered and
well-deﬁned science in which foods,
drugs, and poisons will be integrated in
the metabolism of the simplest constituents of living matter.
Finally, in recalling the great names
associated with studies of the pharmacological agents that made it possible
for us to reach our present level, I can
only speak with emotion of all those
who preceded me, particularly of my
teacher, Ernest Fourneau, who wrote
such a great and glorious chapter of
therapeutic chemistry and whose name
will forever be written in the history
of this science.
My feelings are sincerely divided between the immense pleasure I feel at
the honor which is bestowed on me and
my sense of inadequacy at being unable
to repay my teachers and colleagues all
that I owe them. This feeling is the more
vivid because therapeutic chemistry is a
very young science that has developed
amazingly during the past half century;
perhaps in no other domain does the
part played by each individual appear
so clearly and with such continuity as in
our studies, where every formula bears

it bears so many theoretical and prac—
tical possibilities, that I cherish the hope
that my future work will justify not
only the marvellous distinction I have
received today but also the conﬁdence
and the friendship of my teachers and
colleagues, whose works cannot be separated from those I pursue with confidence, enthusiasm, and love.
Bibliography
The following bibliography includes mainly general reviews; concerning studies published prior to
1948, the reader is referred to the work published
in collaboration with Mme. F. Bovet-Nitti.
Z. M. Bacq, “La pharmacologie du systeme nerveux autonome, et particuliérement du sympathique, d’apres la théorie neurohumorale,” Arm.
physio]. physicochim. biol. 10, 467 (1934).
D. Bovet, “Introduzione allo studio ﬁsiologico e
farmacologico del curaro,” Boll. soc. ital. bio].
sper. 25, 539 (1949).
, “Introduction to antihistamine agents and
Antergan derivatives,” Arm. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 50,
1089 (1950).
, “Some aspects of the relationship between
chemical constitution and curare-like activity,”
ibid. 54, 407 (1951).
and F. Bovet-Nitti, Structure et Activite’
pharmacodynamique des Médicaments du syrtéme nerveux vége’tatif (Basle, 1948).
“Curare,” Experientia 4, 325 (1949).
,
“Rapports de structure entre sympathomimétiques et sympatholytiques. De l’adrénaline a
l’ergotamine,” Actualités pharmacol. N0. 6
(1953), p. 21.
, “Le chlorure de succinylcholine, agent
curarisant a breve durée d’action,” Sci. Med.
Ital. 3, 509 (1955).
, S. Guarino, V. G. Longo, R. Fusco,
“Recherches sur les curarisants de synthése. III,
Succinylcholine et dérivés aliphatiques,” Arch.
intern. pharmacodynamie 88, 1 (1951).
D. Bovet and V. G. Longo, “Pharmacologie de
la formation réticulée du tronc cerebral,”
Oomph-rend. 20éme Congr. intern. physiol.
Bruxeller (1956), pp. 306—329.
D. Bovet and P. Viaud, “Curares synthése: Chimie
et pharmacologie,” Aneslhésie et analgésie 8,
328 (1951).
F. Bovet-Nitti and D. Bovet, “Recherches sur les
ocytociques de synthése: dérivés de la phenylglycinamide,” Arch. intern. pharmacodynamic
6, 327 (1954).
F. Briicke, “Dicholinesters of -dicarboxylic acids

‘

1263

�and related substances,” Pharmacol. Revs. 8,
265 (1956).
W. B. Cannon and A. Rosenblueth, Autonomic
Neuroeﬂector System (New York, 1937).
J. Castilljo and B. Katz, “Biophysical aspects of
neuro—muscular transmission,” Progr. in Biophys.
and Biophys. Chem. 6, 122 (1956).
H. H. Dale, “Transmission of nervous effects by
acetylcholine,” Harvey Lecture Ser. 32, 229
(1937).
L. Donatelli and U. Seraﬁni, Gli antistaminici di
sintesi (Naples, 1951).
J. C. Eccles, “The electrophysiological properties
of the motoneurone,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol. 17, 175 (1952).
V. Erspamer, “Pharmacology of indolealkylam~
mines,” Pharmacol. Revs. 6, 425 (1954).
U. S. von Euler, “The nature of adrenergic nerve
mediators,” ibid. 3, 247 (1951).
S. M. Feinberg, S. Malkiel, A. R. Feinberg, The
Antihistamines (Chicago, 111., 1950).
W. Feldberg, “The role of acetylcholine in the
central nervous system, Brit. Med. Bull. 6, 312
(1950).
R. Fusco, G. Palazzo, S. Chiavarelli, D. Bovet,
“Ricerche sui curari di sintesi, IV,” Gazz. chim.
ital. 79, 836 (1949).
L. S. Goodman and M. Nickerson, “Clinical ap-

plication of adrenergic blockade,” Med. Clin.
N. Am. 34, 379 (1950).
H. R. Grifﬁth and G. E. Johnson, “The use of
curare in general anesthesia,” Anesthesiology 3,
418 (1942).
B. N. Halpern, “Les antihistaminiques de synthese,
essais de chimiothérapie des états allergiques,”
Arch. intern. pharmacodynamie 68, 339 (1942).
, “Sur le mécanisme d’action des antihistaminiques de synthése,” Presse Med. 57, 949
(1949).
H. R. Ing, “The curariform action of onium
salts,” Physiol. Revs. 16, 527 (1936).
S. W. Kuﬂler, “Physiology of neuro-muscular
junctions: electrical aspects,” Federation Proc.
7, 437 (1948).
O. Loewi, “Problems connected with the principle
of humoral transmission of nerve impulses,”
Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 1188, 299 (1936).
G. B. Marini~Bettolo, “Contribution a l’étude
des alcaloides des Strychnos du Brésil,” Festschr.
Arthur Stoll (Basel, 1957), pp. 257—280.
, S. Chiavarelli, D. Bovet, “Ricerche sui
simpatolitici di sintesi della serie dell’ergotammina,” Gazz. chim. ital. 80, 281 (1950).
A. R. McIntyre, Curare. Its history and clinical
use (Chicago, 111., 1947).
D. Nachmansohn, “Metabolism and function of

Manuel Luz Roxas,
Agricultural Chemist
Manuel Luz Roxas was one of the foremost scientists in the Philippines. His
valuable services to the University of the
Philippines as a teacher of chemistry in
the College of Agriculture and the important role he played in the creation
and organization of the National Research Council of the Philippines will
be long remembered.
Almost immediately after Dr. Roxas’
graduation from the University of the
Philippines in 1911, with a BS. degree

Hg?
‘

\

._

Manogmmm OF

in Agriculture, his ﬁrst research work
appeared in the Philippine Agriculturist
and Forester under the title “The pandan industry in Majayjay.” This was
soon followed by three other articles in
the same journal: “The cultivation of
coconut,” “The effect of some stimulant
upon rice,” and “The coffee industry in
the island of Luzon.” Dr. Roxas pursued
further studies in his chosen ﬁeld and in
1913 obtained his MS. degree at the
University of the Philippines, where he
then served as instructor in chemistry
until he was appointed a university fellow to the United States. Evidently this
appointment was in recognition of his
unusual endowment with the “divine
spark” to perform research. He enrolled
in the University of Wisconsin and received his Ph.D. there in 1916.
On his return to the Philippines, Dr.
Roxas resumed his position in the Col-'
lege of Agriculture in the University of
the Philippines, where he was later appointed assistant professor, then professor of chemistry, and ultimately, professor emeritus of agricultural organic
chemistry. He was also named Distinguished Alumnus of the University of the
Philippines in 1932 for achievement in
scientiﬁc research. All these deserved

11111111111111 131111111111

HILLSIDE HOSPITAL
QLEN omsm. v.

'

recognitions were due to his active labor
in the ﬁeld of research, especially in
agricultural chemistry and food technology; his 95 scientiﬁc papers were
published in various journals, including
the Philippine Agriculturist and Forester, the [ournal of Biological Chemis—
try, Sugar News, and the Journal of the
Philippine Islands Medical Association.
The National Research Council of the
Philippines owes its origin to the leadership of Dr. Roxas. He headed a committee that worked continuously in
preparing the draft of the bill for its creation which was introduced in the House
of Representatives. With the support of
Manuel L. Quezon as Senate President
and other leaders of the Philippine Legislature, and the cooperation of the then
Governor General Frank Murphy, Act
4120 creating a National Research
Council for the promotion of research
along scientiﬁc lines was approved on
8 December 1933. Elected as ﬁrst chairman of the National Research Council,
Dr. Roxas did a great deal in the organization of the different divisions integrating the Executive Committee of the
council. For his distinguished and outstanding contributions in scientiﬁc research in the Philippines, Dr. Roxas
may well be considered the “father of
the National Research Council of the
Philippines.”
Manuel Luz Roxas was a man of
sterling character, a good Filipino and
patriot, simple and humble; all these
qualities enhanced his merit as a true
man of science. Our country can never
repay what it owes him for his scientiﬁc
labor and devotion to research.
ANTONIO G. SISON

National Research Council of the
Philippines, Quezon City
SCIENCE, VOL. 129

_

3.1u1111959

the nerve cell,” Harvey Lecture Ser. 49, 57
(1956).
W. D. M. Paton and E. J. Zaimis, “The methonium compounds,” Pharmacol. Revs. 4, 219
(1952).
M. Protiva. “Chemie antihistaminovych latek a
histaminové skupiny,” Nakladatelstvi L'eskolovenske’ Akademie véd (Prague, 1955).
M. M. Rapport, “Serum vasoconstrictor (serotonin) : IV,” ]. Biol. Chem. 180, 961 (1949).
Raymond-Hamet, “Sur un nouveau cas d’inversion
des eﬂets adrénaliniques,” Compt. rend. acad.
sci. 180, 2074 (1925).
Rend. ist. super. sanita‘ 12, 1-264 (1949) (numero
speciale sui curari di sintesi).
Ibid. 15, 723—1040 (1952) (numero speciale sugli
ergotamminici di sintesi).
E. R. Rothlin, “The pharmacology of the natural
and dihydrogenated alkaloids of ergot,” Bull.
schweiz. Akad. med. Wiss. 2, 249 (1947).
A. M. Staub, “Recherches sur quelques bases
synthétiques antagonistes de l’histamine,” Ann.
inst. Pasteur 63, 400 (1939).
S. Thesleﬂ', “Succinylcholine iodide. Studies on its
pharmacological properties and chemical use,”
Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl. 99, 1 (1952).
D. W. Woolley, A Study of Antimetabolites (New
York, 1952).

�Cultural Determinants of Response to Hallucinatory

Experience

ANTHONY F. C. WALLACE. Ph.D.
PHILADELPHIA

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry
July 1959, Vol. 1, pp. 58-69
Copyright 1959, by American Medical Association

Cultural Determinants of Response to Hallucinatory
Experience
ANTHONY F. C. WALLACE, Ph.D.,

Philadelphia

Hallucination attracts the attention of the
anthropologist for several reasons: First,
because, as one of the most ancient and
most widely distributed of the modes of
human experience, most, if not all, human
cultures provide deﬁnitions of and responses
to it which are of interest to the descriptive
ethnographer; second, because a vast quan—
tity of content has been introduced into the
cultural repertoire of mankind by halluci—
natory ideation in dreams, visions, and
hypnogogic imagery, and hallucination must
therefore be considered in relation to culture
change; and, third, because hallucination is
often deﬁned in Western societies as a
symptom of mental and/or physical disease,
and anthropologists play a role in medical
research in these societies. It is in the last
context, particularly in the area of mental
health research, that the present inquiry is
undertaken.
Cross—cultural materials on hallucination
may be of interest in a mental health re—
search context in at least two ways. First,
and rather obviously, both psychiatrist and
anthropologist will expect the manifest con—
tent of hallucination to vary, as does the
content of other behavior, to some degree
with cultural setting, and they may be
interested in the range, frequencies, and
associations of various types of manifest
content. Differences of opinion exist in
Submitted for publication Sept. 3, 1958.
This study was in part supported by Grant
M-1106 from the National Institute of Mental
Health, U. S. Public Health Service.
Research assistants were Fred Adelman, Josephine Dixon, Joan K055, and Robert J. Smith.
The writer has beneﬁted from discussion of
methodological problems in psychopharmacology
with Dr. Harry Pennes and Dr. Harold Rashkis,
of the Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute.

74/58

regard to the supposed variability of latent
content: Lincoln, in his study of dreams in
primitive cultures, and other psychoanalyti—
cally oriented scholars have emphasized the
universal presence in dreams of Oedipal
themes and the classic “Freudian” sym—
bols 13; less strictly psychoanalytic ethnolo—
gists have not emphasized the presence of
these themes so much as culturally and
personally idiographic onesﬁ2'3 In any case,
however, we shall not be primarily concerned with the content per se of hallucina—
tions. Rather, we shall deal with the
problem of the deﬁnition of and response
to the experience, by the society, by the
scientiﬁc observer, and by the hallucinator
himself. The rationale for such an approach, in a mental health context, is twofold: First, knowledge of the range of
deﬁnitions and response, and their cultural
associations, may help in diagnosis and in
communication with patients; and, second,
it is likely that in some cultural subgroups
in our society the nature of deﬁnition and
response to hallucination entertained by
hallucinator and his associates may aggra—
vate or precipitate other mental disabilities
in the hallucinating person. Indeed, the
mental patient may suffer from added anx—
iety precisely because of the nature of the
deﬁnition of hallucinatory experience which
he entertained prior to experiencing it him—
self. Certainly among hospitalized patients
in our society, the attempt to conceal halluci—
natory experiences from the staff is both
chronic and, in one sense, realistic: Staff
members frequently take a negative View of
hallucinations, and hallucinating patients are
subject to measures which, from the pa—
tient’s standpoint, may be punishments (de-

�RESPONSE TO HALLUCINATORY EXPERIENCE
lay in discharge, restriction of privileges,
questioning on sensitive issues, subtle contempt, and even ridicule, from both staff

and other patients) .23

Problems of Deﬁnition
Uncertainties of deﬁnition impede re—
search in the area of hallucinatory experi—
ence. Although hallucination is commonly
treated by psychiatrists as a symptom of
mental disorder, its occurrence is neither a
necessary nor a sufﬁcient condition for such
a diagnosis. Most psychiatrists, furtherword
the
restrictions
two
on
impose
more,
“hallucination,” excluding from its exten—
sion those ideational experiences which oc—
cur during sleep and assigning to it a
generally negative valence. These restric—
tions are useful in psychiatry in our own
cultural setting, but they are not helpful in
establishing a cross—culturally applicable
deﬁnition (nor need they be, for a Western
psychiatrist’s deﬁnition is to be regarded
as only one cultural variant), since in some
societies dreams and waking visions may
be for many purposes treated as equivalent.
For the purposes of this study, “hallucina—
tion” will be deﬁned, very broadly, as pseu—
doperception, without relevant stimulation
of external or internal sensory receptors,
but with subjective vividness equal to that
aroused by such stimulation. Included in
its extension, therefore, are dreams, the
ter—
of
“hallucinations”
psychiatric
waking
minology, and hypnogogic imagery; excluded is the fainter audiovisual imagery of
reﬂective thought. There remains a some—
what dubious category, occasionally referred
to as hallucinations in the psychiatric lite-ra—
ture, of perceptions whose subject matter
is unambiguously provided by external stim—
ulation but whose form displays subtle or
gross distortion. The most familiar exam—
ples are the undulating ﬂoors, stretched
perspectives, echoing sounds, and other dis—
tortions experienced by some subjects on
administration of the so—called hallucino—
genic or psychotomimetic drugs, and by
normal subjects who have consumed nar—
Wallace

or alcohol, have been breathing
anesthetics, or are in process of losing
consciousness (fainting). We shall leave
these phenomena out of the range of our
deﬁnition, on the ground that a “hallucina—
tory” dimension already exists, of vividness
of subjective imagery in the absence of
sensory stimulation, at all points of which
the pseudoperception may be equally undis—
torted, and relate these dubious cases,
rather, to a logically independent dimension
of perceptual distortion. The relationship
between the two dimensions may, of course.
be investigated empirically.
A second major problem, in addition to
the concept of hallucination itself, is that
perennial ﬂower of confusion, the word
“possession.” Casual observers and many
anthropologists alike use this word in two
very different senses: as a label for some
person’s overtly observable behavior, and as
a label for a native theory to explain this be—
havior. These two uses are, unhappily, often
confused. It may be best to state ﬂatly, at the
outset, that I shall use the word “possession” to denote any native theory which
explains some event of human behavior as
being the result of the physical presence,
in a human body, of an alien spirit which
takes over certain or all of the host’s executive functions, most frequently speech and
control of the skeletal musculature. A phe—
nomenon of possession does not, therefore,
for me exist; the word merely labels a
theory.
Now the possession theory happens to be
frequently applied, in folk beliefs, to three
very different classes of phenomena, for
each of which other terms exist. One of
these is hallucination; the second is hysteri—
cal dissociation (including multiple personality, fugues, somnambulism, conversion
hysterias, and hypnotic states); the third is
obsessive ideation and compulsive action.
Clinically, these are distinguishable phenom—
ena. But any one, or group, of them can
be, in folk theory, explained by the mecha—
nism of possession. Unfortunately, some
observers have, in their eagerness to empa—
thize with their subjects, used the word
cotics,

75/59

�A. M. A.

possession to denote not only a type of folk
theory but also whatever phenomenon their
folk happen to use the theory to explain.
In other words, if a people use the concept
of “possession” to explain certain hysterical
dissociations (such as the stereotyped
fugues which are so commonly induced in
many religious rituals), the anthropologist
tends to say that the dancers in the ritual
are “possessed”; similarly, if a people use
the theory to explain hallucination (which
is, incidentally, a less common use of the
concept), the anthropologist may refer to
hallucinators as “possessed” persons. Even
more confusingly, the ethnographer may use
the word to denote any person who is
thought to be persistently inﬂuenced by a
supernatural being, whether located inside
or outside the person’s body.
A third problem of conceptual ambiguity
is the notion of trance. There would seem
to be at least two major uses of this term:
(1) to denote physiological collapse with
coma or the occasionally concomitant delirious hallucinations; and (2) to denote
(again) states of dissociation. The possi—
bilities of semantic confusion are manifest.

Problems of Methodology
At ﬁrst, it was hoped that the Human
Relations Area Files (HRAF), including
the old Cross—Cultural Survey Files at New
Haven and the completed portions of
HRAF at New Haven and Philadelphia,
would provide a sample of societies various
of whose cultural features could be sta—
tistically related to the phenomena of
hallucination. The data contained in HRAF,
however, even when supplemented by mate—
rial from sources not tapped by HRAF,
and by data on societies not included in
HRAF, proved to be not amenable to
statistical treatment, for three reasons: A
sample which included representative cul—
tures from all major culture areas was not
available; the data were not comparable
from society to society, because of the
extreme unevenness of the reporting (rang—
ing from no report at all to careful, exten—
76/60

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

sive, and psychiatrically informed study),
and the data provided were usually too
crude to permit the discriminations which
I regarded as signiﬁcant for statistical cate-

gories. N0 quantity of time or money spent
in HRAF and other library compilations
can remedy all of these defects of the eth—
nographic literature, and only a vast expenditure of funds in ﬁeld work could amass
new and adequate data on a sufﬁcient num—
ber of societies. The inference to be made
is, rather, that the ethnographic literature
available for areal or world samples, of
the sort envisioned by Murdock 14 and
others in connection with HRAF, is not
suitable for statistical analysis with respect
to all dimensions of anthropological interest,
but is suitable only with respect to certain
highly formalized and conventionally re—
ported dimensions, such as kinship and
subsistence activities. The cultures on
which data were collected from HRAF in
the abortive statistical phase of the study
are the following:
Abipone
Achewa
Ainu
Andamanese
Apiaca
Apinage

Aranda
Arikara

Assiniboin
Balinese
Bena
Blackfoot
Buka
Bushman—Hottentot
Canella
Chuckchee
Creek

Crow
Cuna
Dahoman
Easter Island
Gros Ventres
Hopi

Ifugao

Indian Yoga
Kamilaroi
Kwakiutl
Lamba
Maori
Marshallese
Plateau area (North
America)
Sherente

Since nontrivial and signiﬁcant statistics
appeared to be unachievable, the obvious
next step was to consider what prestatistical
manipulations of the data were possible
and whether any of these might yield formulations of interest. Experimentation
along these lines brought me to construct
a rather tedious list of “existence theorems,”
which I shall not reproduce here, but which
proved later to be valuable in setting up the
matrix of concepts. Existence theorems are
Vol. 1, July, 1959

�RESPONSE TO HALLUCINATORY EXPERIENCE

eminently prestatistical, but they are neces—
statistical
of
description,
sort
to
any
sary
since they deﬁne the relevant and nontrivial
categories. An existence theorem is merely
a statement that of the class A: there is at
least one member concerning which the
statement [9 in true; thus, for instance, the
theorem
where

“there exists at least one (x) such
that . . .”

(3x)=df

and

(x):df

“society”

and

A

ber of the society as meaningless concatenations of visual and/or a u d i to r y
pseudo-perceptions.”

The whole of the theorem would read:
“There exists at least one society such that
hallucinations are deﬁned by some members
of the society as meaningless concatenations
of visual and/or auditory pseudopercep—
tions.” From the existence theorems,
derived from the HRAF cross—cultural ma—
terials and from my ethnographic knowledge, the dimensions of hallucinatory
experience shown in Table l were con—
structed. These dimensions are offered as
a formal frame of reference within which
to observe cultural deﬁnitions of hallucina—
tory experience, and as a rough statement of
the range of cultural variability evident in
the ethnographic record.
With the foregoing semantic and methodological considerations in mind, we may
proceed to discuss, informally and nonstatistically, certain implications of the ethno—
graphic data.

Conditions of Hallucination

If one were to design an electronic brain

which behaved in all respects like a normal
human brain, one would have to include in its
speciﬁcations both a capacity for hallucina—
tion and a capacity to distinguish halluci—
nation from sensory perception. Most
human beings hallucinate (in the broad
sense of the term which is employed in
Wallace

Communication

Contains no information but is a meaningless pattern of auditory or visual images
(:2 Contains information in the form of observation of phenomena that really exist somewhere (but are not messages)
(1. Contains message from a supernatural being (ghost, soul,
demon, divinity, etc.) located outside Ego’s body
a . Contains message from, or is the experience of, a supernatural
being (ghost, soul, demon, divinity, etc.) located inside
Ego’s body
((5 Contains message from one part of self (e. g., own soul, conscience, memory, Id, subconscious, etc.) to another (6. g.,
consciousness, ego, etc.) or to other person
as Contains message from a natural being communicating by
means of radio, telepathy, or other means of telecommunication

(1

1

B

p12“hallucinations are deﬁned by some mem-

1.—Dimensiom of Hallucinatory Experience

TABLE

Mechanism of control

Can be controlled by hallucinator and/or hallucinator’s
fellows by manipulating physical condition and/or foreign biochemical factors
()2 Can be controlled by hallucinator and/or hallucinator's
fellows by nonphysical means (such as will, prayer, ritual,
worry, suggestion, autosuggestion, psychotherapy, etc.)
I). Can be controlled by will of alien supernatural or natum
being

b

I)

1

t

b5
b.
b1
b3

b

1A0 2

0 [Ab 3
b 2N) a
I) 1A0 2A1)
.

Other (ﬁll) [Vb

sz

3])

0 Induction
c. Hallucinator seeks to induce or repeat experience
C 2

/—"C

1

D Concealment
d1

Hallucinator conceals experience from group or denies

oc-

currence

d 2 ,—/d

1

Punishment

E

e. Group institutes punishment and/or social extrusion
e

2

He

1

Therapy

1“

Group or individual institutes therapeutic and/or prophy—
lactic measures

f1

fz Hf!
G

Role assignment
g1 Experience qualiﬁes individual for valued social role (adult
hood, shaman, healer, diviner, priest, etc.)
g2

My

1

H Behavior guidance
hi Content of experience may be taken as guide for individual
and/or group action (other than therapeutic) irrespective
of social role of hallucinator
h: Content of experience taken as guide for individual and/or
group action (other than therapeutic) only when hallucinator already ﬁlls certain social roles (e. g. shaman, prophet)

h

, Content of experience not taken as guide for individual and/
or group action (other than therapeutic)

77/61

�A. M. A.

this paper), in one way or another, quite
frequently; and there is no society, to my
knowledge, in which hallucinatory experience is unknown. Hallucination is, in fact,
one of the most widely distributed of the
modes of human experience. Explicit re—
ports of dreams, visions, and the hearing of
voices are found in the sacred literature of
the pre—Christian Near East; if mythology,
ritual, and other religious behavior be re—
garded as in part the legacy of such experi—
ences passed on by oral or written tradition,
we may suspect an antiquity measured in
tens or hundreds of millenia.
Under the general rubric of hallucination,
however, there can be assembled a wide
range of types of experience, from the Vivid
and realistic supplanting of reality in ec—
static visions and auditory revelations, to
a relatively pallid verbal or visual imagery
which blends imperceptibly into ordinary
“thought.” These experiences are known
from Western clinical observations to be
prompted by the most various circum—
stances: sleep, anoxia, pharmacologic agents,
brain tumors, psychological stress, fatigue,
sensory restriction, and others. Relatively
little seems to have been done to relate the
conditions precipitating and surrounding an
event of hallucination to the content of the
experience; ethnographic investigation may
offer a few clues here.
The speciﬁc conditions under which hal—
lucinations have been reported in the ethno—
graphic literature may be divided into the
following categories :
Sleep

Fatigue
Hunger and thirst
Prolonged physical
pain

Extreme physical

illness
Social isolation

Special exercises
(breath control,
posture, sensory

restriction)
Drugs
Emotional stress in
normal persons
Mental illness

It should be noted that these conditions are

not logically independent, and that frequent—
ly (and especially in voluntarily induced
hallucination) two or more of the conditions
are realized at the same time.
Three observations are pertinent. First,
in many societies relatively little signiﬁcance
78/62

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

is attached to differences in the conditions

under which hallucination occurs. In par—
ticular, dreams during sleep, spontaneous
waking visions, and induced hallucinations
under drugs or stress may be given equal
status and comparable evaluation. Western
society is remarkable for the importance it
assigns to differences in the precipitating
conditions of hallucination; the most strik—
ing example, of course, is afforded by the
profound distinctions we draw among
dreams (in sleep), delirium (in illness or
intoxication), and “hallucination” in the
restricted sense (in the waking state). Second, we must take note that, although not
all hallucinatory experiences are regarded as
desirable in any society, in primitive socie—
ties it is very common for hallucinations
with desirable content to be not only ac—
cepted with pleasure but deliberately sought
with the aid of such devices as hallucino—
genic substances (e. g., some American
Indians ingest parts of the cactus peyote
and Paleo—Siberians, the mushroom ﬂy
agaric) and various sorts of personal disciplines, ranging from breathing and posture
exercises, through hunger, thirst, and isola—
tion, to prolonged physical self—torture. The
tendency to minimize discrimination among
hallucinations on a criterion of precipitating
condition of course does not imply any
inability to discriminate between hallucina—
tion and sensory perception; the preferential
status of hallucinatory experiences is possible only when it is clearly differentiable
from normal experience. Third, it appears
that both the subjective feeling tone and the
speciﬁc content of the hallucination are
heavily inﬂuenced by a still more pervasive
condition: the cultural milieu in which the
hallucination, and particularly the voluntary
hallucination, takes place.
The latter point is worth elaborating here,
although it anticipates some of the material
to follow, because it is relevant to the
methodology and evaluation of clinical research with hallucinogenic compounds under
varying experimental conditions. Typically
in such research the clinician administers
Vol. 1, July, 1959

�RESPONSE TO HALLUCINATORY EXPERIENCE
to a group of healthy urban adults, often

medi—
the
with
identiﬁed
themselves
persons
cal or an auxiliary—medical profession, a
substance which induces various instrumentally measurable physiological changes and
observable alterations in behavior. The subjects are asked also to report verbally on
their subjective experience. These verbal
reports reveal a considerable variety of
experience: Some subjects are euphoric;
some are entranced by the intensity of
esthetic pleasure they achieve in the contemplation of color, form, and movement
divorced from meaning; many complain of
anxiety, physical discomfort, various un—
welcome perceptual distortions, and attitu—
dinal changes; some hallucinate and some
do not. These various reports and observa—
tions are taken to indicate the psychological
actions of the drug. Similarly variable re—
sults, but usually with transient intensiﬁcation of chronic symptomatology, are given
by mental patients from roughly comparable
cultural backgrounds (but, of course, by
virtue of illness occupying a very different
social status). But no cultural controls are
employed; and it is possible that to an
unknown degree the subjective experience,
and hence even the physiological measures,
is inﬂuenced by the negative attitude toward
any distortion of normal sensory and cognitive experience which many members of
our society share, at least those people who
do not customarily seek such special experi—
ences as are afforded by narcotics and
alcohol or by mystical or esthetic preoccu—
pations.
Some indication of the quality and mag—
nitude of the possible effect of differing

cultural attitudes toward hallucinatory ex—
perience under differing conditions of drug
administration is given by the differences
in the experiences reported by normal white
subjects after administration of mescaline
and by American Indians after consumption
0d of introduction, and of intragroup per—
sonality differences: ﬁrst, the inﬂuence of
tains mescaline).
The literature on the mescaline experi—
ences of normal subjects is rather scattered,
Wallace

and some of it, particularly if it has an early
date of publication, is unsatisfying because
of the inadequacy of sample description and
the disjointed and anecdotal style of presen—
tation conventional at the time. Neverthe—
less, the consultation of several prime
sources “'25 reveals a reasonably consistent
pattern of described phenomena, which con—
trasts with the pattern described (also,
unfortunately, sometimes in undeﬁned sam—
ples) by anthropologists’ American Indian
informants.”12'1“"!24 The fact of major
contrast has been brieﬂy remarked in print
by one of the—foremost anthropological stu—
dents of peyotism, Slotkin,21 who observed
in the course of discussion of attempts of
white persons to suppress peyotism that
“the responses described in clinical experi—
ments on Whites are so different from the
responses described by Indian Peyotists .
as to fall into completely different catego—
2.—Contrasts in Prevailing Character of the
Responses 0f_Climcally “Normal” White and
Indian Subjects of M escaline Intoxication

TABLE

White

Indian

Variable and extreme mood
shifts (agitated depression,
anxiety, euphoria, depend—
ing on stage of intoxication
and personal characteristics)

Initial relative stability of
mood, followed by religious
anxiety and enthusiasm,
with tendency toward feel—

Frequent breakdown of social
inhibitions and display of

Maintenance of orderly and
“proper” behavior (“revivalistic" enthusiasm is socially proper in context)
No report of suspiciousness

“shameless” sexual, aggressive, etc., behavior
Suspiciousness of others present in environment (reported to be uniformly present
by Guttmann and noted in
self by Kliiver)
Unwelcome feelings of loss of
contact with reality, depersonalization, meaningless“split-personality,"
ness,
etc.
Hallucinations largely idiosyncratic in content
No therapeutic beneﬁts or permanent behavioral changes

ings of religious reverence
and personal satisfaction
when vision achieved, and
often, also, expectation of
“cure” of physical illness

Welcome feelings of contact
with a new, more meaningful, higher order of reality,
but a reality preﬁgured in
doctrinal knowledge and
implying more, rather than
less social participation

Hallucinations often strongly
patterned after doctrinal
model
Marked therapeutic beneﬁts
and behavioral changes (reduction of chronic anxiety
level, increased sense of personal worth, more satisfac»
tion in community life)

79/63

�A. M. A.

ries; they do not seem to be talking about
the same thing.” The salient differences in
the reports are displayed in Table 2; the
reader should note that a meaningful statis—
tical presentation of frequencies of response
types, while desirable, is precluded by the
nature of the data available.
These marked differences would seem to
be plausibly explained by two related fac—
tors which are independent of possible
differences in racial physiology, of chemical
action of the drug owing to variations in
dosage, mixture with other agents, of meth—
od of introduction, and 0f intragroup person—
ality differences: ﬁrst, the inﬂuence of the
setting in which the drug is taken (the
white subject’s experiences occur usually
in a hospital or university research setting;
the Indian experiences, in a ceremonial
lodge during a solemn religious ritual); and,
second, differences in the psychological
meaning of the primary drug effects when
experienced. Certainly, gross enough situ—
ational and semantic differences exist:
White normal subjects generally take mes—
caline once or twice, in a clinical research
setting, with deﬁnite knowledge of an ex—
perimental or a clinical purpose in the
investigation, and without any commitment
to or interest in peyote, or to mescaline
in any form, as a personal religion; Indian
peyote users take mescaline repeatedly,
in a solemn religious setting to the
accompaniment of serious ritual, with
deﬁnite knowledge of a religious purpose
in the usage and, often, with hope for per—
sonal salvation, of which the vision is the
evidence. The former factor—the setting—
5
been
has
reported by Fernberger to yield
differences in content, which can to some
degree be affected both by suggestion by the
experimenter and by autosuggestion. The
latter, the semantic, factor would seem to
be signiﬁcant at the present stage of theory
concerning the action of the hallucinogens,
since it is recognized that both personal
character and, perhaps, personally or cul—
turally determined values concerning the
“homeostasis of subjective—experience” may
80/64

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

affect response to experimentally induced
changes in sensation and perception.19 We
quote the work of Hoch, Cattell, and
Pennes 8 in this connection.
We have pointed out that the alterations in the
vegetative nervous system appear ﬁrst under the
influence of mescaline, lysergic acid, pervitin, etc.
This is usually followed by alterations of per—

ception, bodily sensations, and changes in body
image. In many patients it would appear that the
perceptual alterations are conducive in producing
anxiety, uncertainty, and, at times, rage. Seemingly, the perceptual alterations lead to a lowering
of reality control, thence to tension and anxiety,
which in turn lead to depressive, aggressive, and
paranoid manifestations. Schizophrenic patients
whose reality contact is already impaired are
seemingly more vulnerable to drugs that have a
disorganizing effect on reality perception. As yet
it is unclear whether the emotional alterations seen
in these patients are due to a physiological action
of the drug per se or due to the experiencing of
an alteration of reality and other changes on a psy—
chic level.

Interpretation of Content
In most primitive societies, even if (on
other grounds) the hallucinator is regarded
as being ill, or the hallucination itself is
unpleasurable, the content will not be re—
garded as a meaningless concatenation of
pseudoperceptions. The content of hallucination is sometimes interpreted as a message
introduced directly into the subject’s consciousness by a supernatural being, directed
either to the hallucinator himself or to the
community through him as an intermediary.
More frequently, hallucination will be in—
terpreted as a real perceptual experience by
the soul, which has wandered from the body
and is seeing and hearing events involving
real or supernatural persons which are occurring in another place, or which is able
to see and hear events and supernatural
beings present but imperceptible to others.
The message—intrusion theory tends to blend
into primitive theories of possession; in our
society, it is expressed in the conventional
telepathy, radio, radar, brain—washing, and
electrical—current delusions and is classed as
a paranoid mechanism, while the spiritual—
perception theory is associated with extreme
Vol. 1, July, 1959

�RESPONSE TO HALLUCINATORY EXPERIENCE

religious enthusiasm. But in both theories,
the content of hallucination is interpreted
as signiﬁcant information.
In at least two culture areas, that of the
17th—century Iroquois Indians of what is
now New York State,26 and of Western
society after the advent of psychoanalysis,
a third theory also has existed as an alterna—
tive explanation for hallucination. In this
theory, the hallucination conveys an emo—
tion—laden message from the soul, or some
unconscious part of the mind, to the conscious self, and thus is a process of thought.
This view, like the others, regards the content of hallucination as a message containing
information. It appears to be a rare idea
that the content of hallucination is mean—
ingless, and one may hazard the guess that
this notion is largely conﬁned to psychiatri—
cally unsophisticated, nonparanoid, and
tepidly religious, or nonreligious, members
of Western society.
If a hallucination is regarded as a mes—
sage, there are evidently two approaches to
its interpretation: to take the manifest con—
tent literally, and to regard the manifest con—
tent as a symbolic expression of signiﬁcant
underlying ideas. The latter approach may
entail various techniques, such as guessing
and devices of free association, the consul—
tation of a formal list of symbols and their
meanings, and the more or less standardized
derivation of meaning from the context of
circumstances (such as ritual, illness, situ—
ational stresses, and the like) in which the
hallucination occurred. It is not important
here whether or not there are, in truth,
universal themes and symbols expressed in
dreams and other hallucinatory experiences,
as psychoanalytic theory and data suggest.
The important point is that most human
beings, in most societies, outside Western
civilization, regard hallucinatory content as
communication bearing signiﬁcant informa—
tion which can be understood either directly
or by the use of special methods of interpretation.
Now this belief in hallucinatory content
as communication, particularly when it is
Wallace

coupled with the conviction that the com—
munication is not merely intrapsychic, seems
to have an effect both on the content of
hallucination and on the hallucinator’s, and
his community’s, response to it. Halluci—
nation in itself is not frightening, either
to hallucinator or to his community, al—
though the content may be; but even if the
content is frightening, it is valuable knowl—
edge. Hence the overt response to halluci—
nation will very likely be markedly affected
by its classiﬁcation as communication.
It is to the topic of response to hallucina—
tion that we now turn.

Response to Hallucination
The difference in response between Eng—
lish white and Australian black to a course
of hallucinations in a mourning woman is
vividly illustrated in the following anecdote,
reported by Parker,15 the author of a study
of the Euahlayi tribe of Australia.

Our witch woman was rather a remarkable 01d
person. When she was, I suppose considerably
over sixty, her favourite granddaughter (lied.
Old Bootha was in a terrible state of grief, and
chopped herself in a most merciless manner at the

burial, especially about the head. She would speak
to no one, used to spend her time about the grave,
round which she ﬁxed upright posts which she
painted white, red, and black. All round the grave
she used to sweep continually.
More and more she isolated herself, and at last
discarded all her clothes and roamed the bush 5.
la Eve . . . as she had probably done as a young
girl.
She dug herself an underground camp, roofed
it over, and painted enormous posts which she
erected in front of her “Muddy wine,” as she called
her camp. She never came near the house, though
we had been great friends before.
She used to prowl around the outhouses and pick
up all sorts of things, rubbish for the most part,
but often good utensils too; all used to be secreted
in the underground camp. She never talked to
anyone, but used to mutter continually to herself
and her dogs in an unknown tongue which only her
dogs seemed to understand.
We thought she was quite mad.
One day, while we were playing tennis, she sud—
denly, muttering her strange language and dancing
new corroboree steps, clad only in her black skin,
came up. Matah told her to go away, but she only
corroboreed round him and said she wanted to see

81/65

�A. M. A.

She danced round me for a little time,
then sidled up to me and said:
“\Nahl [negative or “no”] you frightened, wahl
me hurt you. I only womba—mad—all yowee—
spirits—in me tell me gubbah— good—I lib ‘long
a youee: bimeby I come back big feller wirreenun
[as a medicine woman] wahl you frightened? I
not hurt you.”
And after crooning an accompaniment to her
steps, off she went, a strange enough figure, dancing and crooning as she went towards her camp;
and not until the spirits gave up possession of her
did she come near the house again.
I used to tell the other blacks to see that Bootha
had plenty of food. They said she was all right,
the spirits were looking after her. Lunatics, from
their point of view, are only persons spirit-possessed.
Gradually old Bootha, clothed as usual, came
back about the place.
Strange stories came through the house back
to me of old Bootha. She was very ill for a long
time, then suddenly she recovered, not only recovered but seemed rejuvenated. We heard of
wonderful cures she made; how she always consulted the spirits about any illness; how there were
said to be spirits in some of her dogs; how she was
now a rainmaker, and, in fact, a fully ﬂedged
witch.
me.

.

.

.

The reader will note a typical Western
attitude toward the “lunatic,” a blend of
amused contempt, pity, and anxiety, and
also the native woman’s awareness of the
attitude, and her effort to clarify the white
man’s misunderstanding by explaining that
her hallucinatory experiences were “good.”
Noteworthy also is the satisfactory (both
to the woman and to her associates) social
remission, which was achieved in the course
of becoming a shaman: a remission which,
I suggest, was facilitated by her anxiety—
free acceptance of hallucinatory experience.
This anxiety—free acceptance of, and willing—
ness to describe, hallucinatory experience
contrasts vividly with the common shamed,
fearful, self—doubting attitude of Western
patients, who frequently try to conceal the
fact that they “see things” or “hear voices,”
and sometimes “confess” (as the psychi—
atrist puts it) to hallucinations only under
very careful questioning.
Response to hallucination may be considered both as a matter of the hallucinator’s
response to the experience and as a matter
of the response of his group (and the two,
82/66

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

of course, may be equivalent). As I have
indicated, in primitive societies the fact of
hallucination per se is seldom disturbing;
but the content itself may be disturbing or
not, depending on the nature of the socially
appropriate response. Dreamers or vision—
aries may resist strenuously the hallucinated
suggestion that they undergo an arduous
process of becoming a shaman, or that they
accept the role of berdache (an institutional—
ized inversion of sexual role among the
Plains Indians), or that they commit some
act, like murder or incest, which violates
social norms; they may be stricken with
panic at learning of approaching community
disaster, or that they have been bewitched,
or that they will be captured, tortured, and
killed in a future war. Similarly, the hallu—
cinator’s associates may respond with dismay, or with enthusiasm, to the wishes of
his soul, and may institute protective meas—
ures to avert harm from him or from them—
selves, may induct him into the special social
relationships indicated by his vision, may
conduct the indicated medical treatment, or
may take his revelation as a code for social
reform. The signiﬁcant point is that it is
the content of the communication which is
the focus of interest and the fulcrum of
action rather than the fact of hallucination
itself.
Let us now consider, by contrast, the
responses to hallucination typical in
Western societies. In some social groups,
particularly religious sects, hallucinatory
experience with supernatural ﬁgures ap—
parent in the manifest content is interpreted
as divine, 0r Satanic, revelation, and is
responded to either by acceptance of in—
junctions discovered in the content or by
repression, or even punishment designed to
drive out “possessing” devils. In psycho—
analytically inﬂuenced groups (which prob—
ably include a considerable proportion of
the urban population of Western countries),
dreams are interpreted and used as a basis
for psychotherapeutic action, but waking
hallucinations are regarded as symptoms of
serious psychic illness. And in the rest of
Vol. 1, July, 1959

�RESPONSE TO HALLUCINATORY EXPERIENCE

the population at large, waking hallucina—
tions are probably regarded primarily as
indications of “nervous breakdown,” or
even “insanity.’ The latter unfavorable
social diagnosis is very commonly followed
by the social extrusion of the hallucinator,
with or without prior medical advice, into
a mental hospital or some other socially
restricted environment, or at the very least
into a quasiostracism at home or in lodgings.
Police force is available and not uncom—
monly used to sanction and to effect this
extrusion. In medical circles, despite recog—
nition that hallucination in many conditions
is a secondary symptom, and despite the
insistence of workers like Boisen that “what
the voices say is the important thing, not
1 hallucina—
the mere fact of hearing voices,”
tion is commonly taken to be a grave sign.
In some of the research literature, indeed,
hallucination is treated as if it were the
essential feature of psychosis.
Now it is reasonable to suppose that most
persons, when they hallucinate for the ﬁrst
time (certainly when the ﬁrst waking hallu—
cination occurs), are aware of the culturally
standard interpretation of and response to
hallucination in their society. Even if they
do not accept this interpretation and re—
sponse as wise or proper, they will be aware
of its probable evocation in others. If this
is the case, then it is likely that the person’s
interpretation of, and response to, the fact
of his own hallucination in a given context
(as well as its content) will be a function
of the way in which the fact (and content)
of hallucination is deﬁned by his culture.
The function should determine in part his
’

emotional experience both during and after
the event, and possibly (by cultural suggestion) its perceived content as well.
'We may ask, at this point, how much
anxiety, self—depreciation, and cognitive dis—
tortion are added to the miseries of mental
patients by the circumstance that they have
learned to fear waking hallucination in the
course of living in a society in which waking hallucinatory experience is almost uni—
formly negatively valued? (The scientiﬁc
validity of the valuation is irrelevant.)
Furthermore, we must question the completeness of any research into the psychophysiological action of the so—called
psychomimetic drugs, of sensory restriction,
and of other hallucinogenic procedures
which fails to weigh not only the magnitude
but also the direction of the probably mas—
sive contaminating effect of cultural sug—
gestion upon the subjects. For what is
measured is not just the action of a drug
or other procedure, but the action of the
procedure plus the subject’s interpretation
of and response to this action, plus the feedback effect on the continuing action itself
(Figure); and all of these actions, inter—
pretations, responses, and effects are factors
with direction, as well as magnitude.
There may be much that the therapist can
do to alter the internalized cultural deﬁni—
tions of hallucinatory experience in his
patients, if he wishes. But it is research
problems that chieﬂy concern us here. It
would be possible in clinical research to con—
trol for the direction of cultural effects by
employing as control subjects persons whose
subculture differs sharply from that of the

Hallucinatory

pseudo—

perception
SPECIFIC

HALLUCINOGENIC
STIMULUS
CONDITION

cognition
of Situation

-””'“°'°‘
,

.

-39. “—3).
_____ Musculofure
1’

Vaugned'gme"

"em”s

'

.

WWW

/

‘
.

personal-3y

.

2‘

..

dynamics

,

Internalized
cultural
15"
definition
of situation
9

MOTOR

vEggAL
*{ RESPONSE

Mediation of response
,
,
to hallucmOgenic stimulus
by facets 0m; subjectlve
experience.
_

-

-

9

NERV°
Wallace

83/67

�A. M. A.

experimental subjects in its deﬁnition of the
expected experience, and by ensuring that
the experimental conditions for the controls
were sufﬁciently close to culturally normal
conditions for them to permit generalization
from past learning. Furthermore, it would
be possible to select subjects systematically
on criteria of personality, of past experi—
ence, and of attitude toward the expected
events; and it would be possible to vary
deliberately the general situational structure
with other variables held constant, both by
physical manipulation and by deliberate in—
struction and suggestion to the subjects.
Such procedures, incidentally, should also be
considered in relation to other than halluci—
nogenic compounds; they evidently would
apply to such drugs as tranquilizers, sedatives, and energizers, which on other evidence also depend in part for their effects
on relatively unexplored interactions with
personal dynamics and sociocultural milieu.18
Methodologically, such manipulations are the
reverse images of the controls imposed by
the placebo—and—blind (or double—blind)
techniques and of analysis—of—variance tech—
niques involving multiple pharmacologic
agents; whereas the placebo-plus—blind, or
variance—analysis, design varies the chemical
agent and holds situation constant either by
randomization or by laboratory control, the
method of cultural and situational controls
would hold the drug constant and vary such
aspects of situation as the physical experi—
mental conditions, instructions to personnel,
and character and background of subjects.
Drug and cultural controls should ideally
be combined in one design.

Summary
The paper brieﬂy examines the range of
cultural variation in conditions inducing,
interpretations of, and responses to, hallu—
cinatory experience. The published data
suggest strongly that internalized cultural
deﬁnitions of hallucinatory experience have
a profound effect on the responses both of
mentally ill and of normal persons. Meth—
odological controls for cultural differences
84/68

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

are indicated in research with hallucinogenic
substances.
Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute.

REFERENCES
Boisen, A. T.: The Exploration of the Inner
World, New York, Harper &amp; Brothers, 1936.
1.

Eggan, D.: The Manifest Content of Dreams:
A Challenge to Social Science, Am. Anthropologist
2.

54 :469, 1952.

Eggan, D.: The Personal Use of Myth in
Dreams, J. Am. Folklore 68 :445, 1955.
4. Fernberger, S. W.: Observations on Taking
Peyote (Anhalonium lewinii), Am. J. Psychol.
3.

34 :267, 1923.

Fernberger, S. W.: Further Observations on
Peyote Intoxication, J. Abnorm. &amp; Social Psychol.
5.

26:367, 1932.

Guttmann, E.: Artiﬁcial Psychoses Produced
by Mescaline, J. Ment. Sc. 82 2203, 1936.
6.

Hoch, P. H.: Experimental Induction of
Psychoses, in The Biology of Mental Health and
Disease, 27th Annual Conference of Milbank
Memorial Fund, New York, Paul B. Hoeber, Inc.
(Medical Book Department of Harper &amp;
7.

Brothers),

1952.

Hoch, P. H.; Cattell, J. P., and Pennes,
H. H.; Effect of Drugs: Theoretical Considera—
tions from a Psychological Viewpoint, Am. J.
Psychiat. 1082585, 1952.
8.

Huxley, A.: The Doors of Perception, New
York, Harper &amp; Brothers, 1954.
10. Klﬁver, H.; Mescal Visions and Eidetic
Visions, Am. J. Psychol. 371502, 1926.
11. La Barre, W.: The Peyote Cult, in Native
American Culture, Yale University Publications
in Anthropology, No. 19, New Haven, Conn, Yale
University Press, 1938.
12. La Barre, W.: Primitive Psychotherapy:
Peyotism and Confession, J. Abnorm. &amp; Social
Psychol. 42:294, 1947.
13. Lincoln, J. S.: The Dream in Primitive Cul—
tures, Baltimore, Williams &amp; Wilkins Company,
9.

1935.

Murdock, G. R: World Ethnographic Sample, Am. Anthropologist 592664, 1957.
14.

15.

Parker, K. L.: The Euahlayi Tribe, London,

Archibald Constable

&amp; C0., 1905.

Petrullo, V.: The Diabolic Root: A Study
of Peyotism, the New Indian Religion, Among the
Delawares, Philadelphia, University of Pennsyl—
vania Press, 1934.
16.

Vol. 1, July, 1959

�RESPONSE TO HALLUCINATORY EXPERIENCE
Radin, P.: The Winnebago Tribe, Washington, D. C., Bureau of American Ethnology, 37th
Annual Report to Secretary of Smithsonian In—
stitute, 1915-1916, 1923.
17.

Rashkis, H. A., and Smarr, E. R.: A Method
for the Control and Evaluation of Sociopsychological Factors in Pharmacological Research,
Psychiat. Res. Rep. 9:121, 1958.
18.

Rubin, L. S.: The Psychopharmacology of
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD—25), Psychol.
19.

Bull. 54:479, 1957.

20. Slotkin, J. S.: Menomini
Philos. Soc., n. 5. 42:4, 1952.

Peyotism, Tr. Am.

J. S.: The Peyote Religion: A
Study in Indian—White Relations, Glencoe, 111.,
Free Press, 1956.
21. Slotkin,

Wallace

22. Smythies, J.

R.: The Mescaline Phenomena,

Brit. J. Philos. Sc. 3:339, 1953.
23. Smythies, J. R.: A Logical and Cultural
Analysis of Hallucinatory Sense—Experience, J.
Ment. Sc. 102:336, 1956.

D.: Personality and Peyotism
in Menomini Indian Acculturation, Psychiatry 15:
24. Spindler, G.

151, 1952.

25. Stockings, G.

T.: A Clinical Study of the

Mescaline Psychosis, with Special Reference to the
Mechanism of the Genesis of Schizophrenia and
Other Psychotic States, J. Ment. Sc. 86:29, 1946.
26. Wallace, A. F. C.: Dreams and the Wishes

of the Soul: A Type of Psychoanalytic Theory
Among the 17th Century Iroquois, Am. Anthropologist 602234, 1958.

Printed and Published in the United States of America

85/69

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="3">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67484">
                <text>Files and reprints: hallucinogens and EEG, 1959 (folder title 2/2).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67485">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67486">
                <text>mfp-03-01-002-15-015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67487">
                <text>1959</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67488">
                <text>Various authors</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67489">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67490">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67491">
                <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67492">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67493">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="80951">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87512">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94073">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="100634">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3">
        <name>Research</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="245" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="36">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/ac5e73da19470d46979be1d3e57b7963.pdf</src>
        <authentication>289f176e87e6c22e9a18830dea076106</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="100662">
                    <text>Reprinted from
JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL

Volume V

April, 1956

Number 2

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE
THERAPY FOR RELIEF OF ANXIETY1
MORTON WACHSPRESS, M.D.,2 ARNOLD G. BLUMBERG, M.D.,3
MAX FINK, M.D.,4 and JOSEPH S. A. MILLER, M.D.5

‘

During the past few years increasing interest has been shown in
the role of drugs in psychiatric practice. Previous studies on the
usefulness of extracts of Rauwolﬁa Serpentina at this hospital demonstrated minimal value for this drug in alleviating anxiety symptoms (4). In the light of these studies which contrasted with more
recent enthusiastic reports, an investigation of the effectiveness of
large doses of reserpine in relieving anxiety symptoms and altering
behavior was undertaken.
Numerous reports have appeared in the past two years describing
the effectiveness of reserpine in reducing aggressive and assaultive
behavior (2, 5); alleviating manic states (14); and reducing the need
for electroshock therapy (10). The reports of its potency in reducing
anxiety, affecting neurotic symptoms or altering depressive symptoms (6, 12) have been less laudatory. In addition, reserpine-induced
depressions have been noted in the course of treatment for hypertension (9, 11). No evidence has been forthcoming that reserpine has
altered the course of a psychiatric illness, although many reports
emphasize the quieting effects of the drug or its usefulness as an
“adjuvant to psychotherapy” (7).
This investigation was undertaken to determine the usefulness of
reserpine in a voluntary psychiatric hospital population treated in
an open ward setting. A double-blind placebo controlled study with
1

From the Research Service and Medical Department of the Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks, N. Y.
ZSenior Resident Psychiatrist, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
3 Associate Visiting Physician, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
4 Director of Research, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
5 Medical Director, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N. Y.
67

�68

WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

large ﬁxed doses of drug was selected as a technic of evaluation for
this study. The evaluation of improvement in a psychiatric patient
under therapy presents problems which are all too familiar to careful investigators in the ﬁeld. In a hospital environment where the
total therapeutic regime combines to produce improvement, the
evaluation of the effect of a drug must be carefully controlled. Certain criteria must be established to differentiate between improvement consistent with the course of the disease, and improvement
greater than what may be expected from the normal course of hospitalization. To properly attribute improvement to a drug the following criteria should be satisﬁed: the patient should improve while
receiving medication; this improvement should be greater than at
the time when the medication is replaced by suitable placebo medication; and improvement should be reproducible at a later date with
a similar drug dosage. The use of a double-blind placebo controlled
study provides a method for such an evaluation and it is doubtful if
deﬁnitive conclusions are justiﬁed in the absence of such studies (3).
To further minimize the subjective factor in the clinical evaluation, rating scales have been employed, despite their well-known
limitations. In this study, the revised rating scale of Malamud and
Sands (8) was utilized to provide further experience for the observers
in standardizing their reports and to permit a constant frame of
reference for changes in symptoms and behavior during therapy.
METHOD

The patients in this study were those who presented, both subjectively and objectively, severe anxiety and agitation. They were
selected from the patients recommended by the resident
psychiatrists
for electroshock or drug therapy. The ﬁnal decision as to which
patients should receive reserpine was made by the two psychiatrists
working on the study, who based their selection on the presence of
severe anxiety and tension symptoms.
Of the original group of seventeen, ﬁfteen patients
completed
the study. Two male patients, one diagnosed as schizophrenia and
one as psychoneurosis, discontinued the treatment because of increasing tension, agitation and nausea while on the drug regimens. Of
the seventeen patients, eleven were diagnosed as schizophrenia, ﬁve
as psychotic depression and- one as mixed psychoneurosis. There
were eight males and nine females. The age range was 19 to 52 with
a median age of thirty-three.

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

69

Each patient was observed for a period of twelve weeks. Every
patient received an intramuscular injection of 2cc. of reserpine6 and
ﬁve tablets daily throughout the twelve-week period. Depending on
which regimen was selected, placebo tablets and injections were substituted for the drug.
The four regimens were:

reserpine, 10 mg. daily—5 mg. orally and 5 mg. intramuscular;
(2) reserpine, 5 mg. daily—orally;
(3) reserpine, 5 mg. daily—intramuscular; and
(4) placebo only.
(1)

Regimens were selected in random order by the internist, and the
regimen was unknown to the patient, therapist, evaluating psychiatrist or nursing personnel.
Weekly psychiatric evaluations were done on each patient by an
evaluating psychiatrist. A modiﬁed Malamud scale was employed as
well as the subjective reports of the patient and the impressions of
the observer.
The patients were concurrently studied by the internist at regular intervals. Blood pressures and pulse rates were measured in a
sitting position on casual examination at irregular intervals. Only
two patients could be classiﬁed as hypertensive before treatment.
Each patient was weighed weekly. A radioactive iodine determination was performed before starting treatment and repeated no
sooner than three weeks after instituting treatment with an effective
dose of reserpine. Routine blood counts, urinalyses and other laboratory tests were conducted as indicated.
RESULTS

Psychiatric Observations
Of the ﬁfteen patients, seven showed a signiﬁcant alteration in
behavior which could be related to drug dosage. Of these, three
showed a relief of anxiety and tension, and four, an increase in depression, tension and agitation. The remaining eight patients manifested no change in behavior. In addition, the two patients who
discontinued the drug regimens did so because of an increase in
tension and anxiety accompanied by nausea and vomiting.
We are indebted to the Ciba Pharmaceutical Company for the reserpine
(Serpasil) and placebo medication used in this study.
6

�WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

72

total scores, an item analysis of the individual behavior items was
undertaken. Those representative items were selected which clinical
experience suggested might reveal changes due to drug action. The
items chosen were: feeling, mood, motor activity, and thought processes. An analysis of these scores failed to indicate any consistent
difference in these characteristics in the patients as a group.
Regarding the differences in the drug regimens, it was the clinical impression of the evaluating psychiatrists and resident therapists
that more moderate doses of reserpine were preferable, giving fewer
objectionable symptoms. Six of the ﬁfteen patients were subjectively
worse on the daily dose of 10 mg. These six included A. 8., one of
the patients who improved on drug regimen, and two of the four
patients whose condition became worse.
Toxic Symptoms
Of seventeen patients who started on the study, two stopped
because of side effects. These patients manifested increased tension
and anxiety, in which nausea and vomiting became prominent symptoms. Numerous other side elfects were observed, and the incidence
of each is noted in Table II. Drowsiness and dizziness were seen
in most of the patients, but caused serious difﬁculty in none. Six
TABLE I
BEHAVIORAL RATINGS—TOTAL SCORE

H.C.
G.W.
ES.
M.C.
R.S.

R.D.
A.S.

F.G.
S.G.

LE.

M.D.

S.K.

P.M.
A.L.
M.B.

Sex

Age

F
F
M
F
F
M
F
F
F
M
F
F
M
M
M

24
52
45
19
19

20
46
28
37
50
42
37
22
37
22

Diagnosis

Schiz.

No Medica tion Placebo
27

Invol. Mel.

Schiz.
Schiz.
Schiz.
Schiz.

Invol. Mel.
Schiz.

M.D.D.
M.D.D.
Invol. Mel.

Schiz.
Schiz.
Schiz.
Schiz.

23-36
20
35,36
30,35
37-46
29-35

34,30
12-19

20
27
36-45
16-22

27,25
27-38
6-9
23-43
16-30
18-29
18,9
19-33
26-28

53

46—57

51,64

57,66

Oral

Intramus- Combined
cular

15

17

28-34

50,53
23,25
27,26

38
29-39

2542

18

20-31

26
40
15,3
45,31

22,15
47,31

25,28
28

27
34
16-28
20-26

23,27
28-36
12,15
29-40
20
29

27

18—26

16—30

53
44,61

53
32-51

51-56

27

825

12,13

37,39

29—38

19
25-38

63—55

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

73

patients developed a Parkinsonian muscular rigidity, which disappeared within a few days after the drug was discontinued. Four patients had one or more episodes of generalized ﬂushing lasting up to
twenty-four hours. This occurred in patients on placebo as well as
on drug, and was interpreted as an allergic reaction to impurities in
the intramuscular solution.
TABLE II
TOXIC EFFECTS

Incidence

.................................
.................................
......................
Nausea
....................................
Parkinsonism
...............................
Painful legs
................................
Hot ﬂashes
.................................
Restlessness
.................................
Swollen feet
................................
Drowsiness
Stuffy nose
Dizziness and Weakness

l4
13
10

7*
6

4
4
3

l

In 2 patients nausea was accompanied by vomiting and was a factor in
discontinuing treatment.
*

Depression

The enhancement of existing depressive symptoms was noted in
three patients, and in another, depressive symptoms appeared where
none had been evident before reserpine therapy. In each instance,
electroshock therapy was recommended and improvement resulted.
Electroshock therapy induced a remission of the anxiety and tension
components of the illness, as well as the depressive. Of the eight patients who manifested no change with reserpine, two were eventually
treated with electroshock, without clinical improvement.

Physiologic Observations
The systolic blood pressure was reduced in ﬁfteen of the sixteen
patients observed over an extended period of time. The magnitude
of this lowering was between 10 and 20 mm. Systolic blood pressures between 90 and 100 mm. were not unusual while on treatment
and were not accompanied by adverse symptoms.
Table III represents average ﬁgures for the highest and lowest
blood pressure and pulse rate recorded during each regimen. There

�74

WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

drop in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and
in pulse rate with reserpine therapy. There is no difference in the
hypotensive or bradycardiac effect of intramuscular or oral administration of 5 mg. reserpine; nor is there any indication that a dosage
of 10 mg. produces a greater effect on blood pressure or pulse rate
than 5 mg. These observations are consistent with previous reports
of the ﬂat dose response curve for reserpine (1).
is a signiﬁcant

TABLE III
Medication

Range Systolic Range Diastolic
Pressure
Pressure Range Pulse Rate

Placebo

135-117

5 mg. p.o.
5 mg. i.m.
10 mg. combined

116—108

118-106
119-109

84-69
70-64
71-63
68-61

98-7 8
74-67
74-68
78-68

Most patients on reserpine reported an increase in appetite, and
there was a tendency for these patients to gain weight. In seven patients, such gains varied from 3 to 20 pounds on the entire treatment
program. Three patients lost weight and four showed no change.
There was no consistent change in the radioactive iodine (1-131)
uptake following the administration of reserpine. Nor could a correlation between weight change and this index be found. Thus, only
two of the patients who gained weight had a decrease in the iodine
uptake. One patient who lost weight had a rise in iodine uptake.
It was concluded that the weight gain and increased appetite were
not related to alteration in thyroid function.
DISCUSSION

High-dose reserpine therapy did not affect the symptoms of
anxiety or tension in these patients. For the most part, patients
were made uncomfortable by the high doses used in this study. Of
the three instances where a relationship between changes in anxiety
and tension could be related to drug dosage, two were noted in
severely ill patients in whom overactivity and agitation were ﬁrst
controlled. The relief of anxiety was secondary to the decrease in
motor excitement. The previous study at this hospital demonstrated
the limited usefulness of low-dosage reserpine therapy for the relief
of anxiety. Considering this, and the results of the present study of

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

75

high-dosage reserpine, it may be concluded that reserpine therapy,
either in low or high doses, has limited use for its relief of anxiety
symptoms in this hospital’s population. Its use is further limited by
the exacerbation in depression which was observed.
Our observations, however, tend to support the reported usefulness of this medication as a sedative in the control of destructive and
overactive behavior. This is seen in our two cases (R. S., M. B.) and
in a series of other overactive patients at the hospital who were
noted to respond to the sedative action of reserpine when this was
introduced in lieu of restraints and massive sedation.
The doses of reserpine in this study were generally too high. Patients were unable to tolerate 10 mg. without uncomfortable side
effects. In no instance were the side effects severe or disabling, however, and in each instance the symptoms responded to a decrease
in drug dosage. The symptom of depression, however, has assumed
special signiﬁcance in these patients. Reserpine exaggerated this
symptom and, in one instance, elicited a depression with suicidal
trends. The reports of increased depression (9, 11) are thus conﬁrmed; and the usefulness of electroshock therapy in relieving these
depressions can be re-emphasized. In this regard, the earlier enthusiastic reports of the usefulness of reserpine as a substitute for electroshock therapy (10) need reassessment. Reserpine is no substitute for
electroshock therapy in the treatment of depressive states. It may
substitute, however, for the use of electroshock as a sedative in the
management of overactive and assaultive behavior.
This study exempliﬁes the advantages and disadvantages of a
drug evaluation study by the double-blind placebo method. With a
limited number of subjects, it is possible to obtain a meaningful
evaluation of the primary effects and complications of a medication.
The drug effects may also be separated from the natural course of
the illness, and from the investment of the therapist in the conclusions. Such a technic has the following limitations: rigidity of
dosage; inability of the therapist to separate drug-induced effects
from alterations in the disease process during the study period; and
the necessity of the selection of patients who are tractable and can
tolerate discomfort for extended periods. Furthermore, such a study
may rob the therapist of his faith in the drug as a therapeutic
vehicle, and thereby limit the patient’s response to the physiologic
effects alone. It also limits the therapist’s control over the care of his
patient, and thereby arouses feelings of helplessness and apprehension in the therapist. In such instances, the cooperation of a mature

�76

WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

therapist is essential because there is considerable opportunity for
the manipulating, demanding, and paranoid patient to arouse the
therapist’s anxiety and hostility to the experimental program.
This study also provided an opportunity to assess the usefulness
of rating scales. In assessing the changes seen during treatment the
rating scales failed to provide any information not available in the
descriptive statements. They did provide, however, a frame of reference for the many items of the psychiatric interview that needed
rating, and provided a base for the comparison of observations made
by different observers.
'

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

In a double-blind placebo evaluation of 5 mg. and 10 mg. doses of
oral and intramuscular reserpine, ﬁfteen voluntary hospitalized
psychiatric patients with severe, overt symptoms of anxiety were
studied. Three patients manifested relief of anxiety related to drug
dosage. In twelve patients no relief was noted, and of these, four
exhibited severe depressive reactions which eventually responded to
electroshock therapy.
Cardiovascular effects of high doses of reserpine were not signiﬁcantly different than previously reported effects of low dosage.
There was no evidence that reserpine altered thyroid function, although weight gain frequently occurred.
The usefulness of high-dose reserpine therapy in the relief of
anxiety symptoms is limited. The dangers of induced depressions,
as well as the rationale of placebo studies and psychiatric rating

scales are discussed.

REFERENCES

(l) A. M. A. Report of Council On Pharmacy and Chemistry, J. A. M. A., 159:

1206, 1955.
(2) Barsa, J. A. and Kline, N. 8.: Treatment of Two Hundred Disturbed Psychotics with Reserpine. J. A. M. A., 158:110, 1955.
(3) Beecher, H. K.: The Powerful Placebo. J. A. M. A., 159:1602, 1955.
(4) Blumberg, A. G., Cohen, L., and Miller, J. S. A.: The Effect of Rauwolﬁa
Serpentina on Anxiety States. This Journal, 3:140-146, 1954.
(5) Cowden, R. C., Zax, M., and Sproles, J. A.: Reserpine—Alone and as an Adjunct to Psychotherapy in the Treatment of Schizophrenia. A. M. A. Arch.
Neurol. c9" Psychiat, 74:518-522, 1955.
(6) Drake, F. R. and Ebaugh, R. G.: The Use of Reserpine in Ofﬁce Psychiatry:
Preliminary Report. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 61:198. 1955.
(7)

Hoffman, J. L. and Konchegul, L.: Clinical and Psychological Observations
on Psychiatric Patients Treated with Reserpine: A Preliminary Report. Ann.
N. Y. Acad. Sci., 61:144, 1955.

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

77

Malamud, W. and Sands, S. L.: A Revision of the Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Am. ]. Psychiat., 1042231, 1947.
(9) Muller, J. C., Pryor, W. W., Gibbons, J. E., and Orgain, E. 8.: Depression
and Anxiety Occurring During Rauwolﬁa Therapy. J. A. M. A., 159:836,

(8)

1955.

(10) Noce, H., Williams, B.,

and Rapaport, W.: Reserpine (Serpasil) in the Man-

agement of the Mentally Ill. 1. A. M. A., 158:11, 1955.
(ll) Schroeder, H. A. and Perry, H. M.: Psychoses Apparently Produced by Reserpine. ]. A. M. A., 1592839, 1955.
(12) Smith, S. K.: The Use of Reserpine in Private Psychiatric Practice. Arm.

N. Y. Acad. Sci., 61:206, 1955.
(13) Wilcoxon, F.: Some Rapid Approximate Statistical Procedures. New York:
Am. Cyanamid Co., 1949.
(14) Zeller, W. W., Graffagnino, P. N., Cullen, C. F. and Rietman, H. J.: Use of
Chlorpromazine and Reserpine in the Treatment of Emotional Disorders.
1. A. M. A., 16021791956.

�W...Vw

W «tum..W w :wWwW
M

AW
M M m.
5%

”a (I)
(3)

W 5. m, mam.)
gt.

.x

q»

~Mh

‘,....¢

dug“.

-H.

«mama-mam.
{2)
{3)
(1:)

mumm,mm
Warn-m

WW

'

Wx zé/nga

ALfJuf “-54

��wmm'

“Raw mm‘wmw.m w 'Qmw-‘w'mx‘twv 7:. 1miuw‘ux

m-

yum-m

w‘w

~rwm—qmvmwwwuv—i—

mwwmummwummmm,mm
”.mmwmwmmmwwtmuwm
ttahwaatouma-dem Mmdammm
Wammxmtwmmmmmmuuma
Wuummmmmwmmmammmm.

mm
mmmmmmummmmum.
www.mmmmmxmmmmmmamwm

WMﬁMWMWkWNerMWWg

��.

.W——.wv-..._. Viﬂw—mr—m.

r

«mm,

..._._..f_rw.._.w.,_...m

.

_..4~,.._.w_
.

“mm‘wmm...” mw—mww—mmmpmr—m_.

—..,

..

‘

=‘-rnu'V4"v~-'w'-'Iw-nmw-UWVVT

.
_
.

t

.

i

T. m"... u.

.

L
,

l

u“... "runwnﬁmpvwnuwu

-—-.—.

«ha»

V

mwmmmwmmumumum
m. mwmmummmmanmmumm
mmmnwmm.wmmmummm
"W'Mmmmm Mmummuwmy.
1m

"

mmMSWWMMﬁuWWﬁﬂEaMwM-ﬁ‘m-

Wu

'

����q1

'W‘W;1

“""‘W‘

4

3‘16.

’1

ﬁg

3.3.
1:3.

23.25

an»

.

I...
3.43:...
,

14.3.

35.36

22.15

39:35

am

m mi.

b.3a

ﬁﬁﬁﬂﬁgﬂgﬁﬁggﬁ

am:

mm.
mm.

1M8

mm.

25438

23,
V

3.3.

.

tees-a

13:9

a?

3min.

”~36

£7

Pm.

Ada

I

m»

Ken.

8.1.

W31

53

51.6:

1%

53

5%“

53155

��21‘

“I

B!

I

W

a

.“wl

m

h
.

1
1::

3
6-

h
13

ahapmummwuwmmmamgwmmm

�5

s

WW.

hmmm,mmmmmmmm

i
s

“@Wuummmmmuﬂumw. arm-mm

mmmmmwwmsnm.a~mnmmmmuu

mummwm. hammocmmm4mmu

mammmmmm muumm—zw

ume-WmeamuuwnWm
’mamm»
m. mummthww
«

Wermmmm«5u.mgmumwmmm
awat'm-ggmagmmctMmWmeuum
5am.

mummmmuﬁpmmmwmmtm

erwmm).

\

|

V

��MammmmMmmm-uthwﬁu,wmmm

ummmmumm kmmﬁuu,mmm
Win w W mWE an m M m m a m: in
WW;$m W mm was gamma“:
in! :

�math-um. rammm,puumum,mwmn
wWMMWhtﬂ-nmg ammmmnumm
mmmmmmwmammmwm.m.m

mwnmemnummmuv-mmuumwnm
mmamﬁmumaemnmwm
mt. WPWMItWWMWWWWMWﬂ
mmmwrwwwamm www.mdm
mudmwtmdmmmgﬂwmmaa
mmw,nwnMwmm,u-mwwrnmm
eta-attuned.

«mwmmwmumum It‘tmumnﬁmw

mmmummmﬂwm
mm,m,mtommuummmam

mmuuMuummzumﬁuumewmw.
mnmhwmm(uulgll}mdiaum¢towwmﬁﬂ

pumatmmmmmwummmmuumaw
WMWqun-uwmummm‘mm
dermma-mmsmmuwmw. hm

wnmnumenémng.umwmmmm. 213mm

wnmuadMumeW,ummwmm

“WMaMMmdrwm mwmdmmm,

m
mummmm,mum;WaWW
umrdmwwm(6)mm‘mmmmumat
WWWHWMWMMWM mm;
www.mrmemudmmamuam

�45w

W

mwumolmmaw(h)mw
stunt. ma:
them in an

Wanna-ab.
tmm Wu mm. x: w

aubmm,m.mmmumm,uumuummm

ofmmﬂmmxmﬁumm.

mwmmmmmmmmmammmmuuwmn
hWMMnWanﬁm‘ﬁtMMOﬁbcth
amattmhm MWMmmumhdtmfhum

mwmmmrmmmmgmmmmmm.
Mammmmmmms mwuwmuwa
wwuhmumwmumnmumumm-w

«ummmmmmmwummde
m tncmle w
Mum
Mama, m

W
ammmdeWtuwmmdmuammﬁam
disco-arm

and

pariah.

wwwzmth‘aW-mm a: «mud-u «3'
“was Wt: mm mm m. m.mung MW
hunt»
m,mwmdtmmmumm1umuumm
mmmwmm-mmsmmmmwpwum
to
«V

WthWﬁWﬂWﬁ.
my

thy

thew: my many
me!

can

Wk). mum.

MWMWthyummmdnm
mamaamumm.
mwmmtm-I

mammmtmwmmmmmmmmmm
www.mha‘Mdnhrm-twmm
imammmnummMMnm-mmmnmmrm
cumin-um».

”mummmmwwmmm

‘

�htW,M'W£5mmmn.Mdonl

WWII: Wt:
mm
W
ammgmﬁWd-mtymm Mupmmm
«a mtmcnlnr

mm, mm

nmpamummm
mammumw;
MmamummmmWWnWMmW

WhWW.
Wmuudmmammmmummw
‘

~

7

mmmum
wommmmmmamm
mt.
mummy mama.
wand mun, awwwu

w.»
mm aw
mmdmmmwnmmam
magnum mmawmiamJummm

mammmmmnmnmmmmm

��70

WACHSPRESS—BLUMBERG—FINK—MILLER

In the improved patients, an alleviation of anxiety was apparent
and related to drug administration. M. B., a 22-year-old male, diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenia, was anxious, depressed, withdrawn,
blocked, delusional and hallucinating. He had been hospitalized
for three of the previous ﬁve years, and had received courses of insulin coma and electroshock therapy with only transient periods of
improvement. After ﬁve months of hospitalization at Hillside Hospital he showed no improvement. During the drug regimens, there
was a diminution in his anxiety, depression, agitation and preoccupation with delusions. These symptoms recurred when on placebo
medication. Introduction of the drug regimen again resulted in the
alleviation of these symptoms, with the progressive amelioration of
his depressive feelings. With the reduction of his drug dosage to

mg. oral, he again manifested a recurrence of symptoms, only to
have them relieved by the combined (10 mg.) regimen. The patient
was maintained on this treatment and discharged, improved, six
months after the treatment was instituted.
A. S., a 46-year-old hypertensive woman, manifested severe tension, anxiety, depression, tremulousness and insomnia, which had
ﬂuctuated over a two-year period. Her diagnosis was involutional
melancholia. While on 5 mg. drug regimens, there was considerable
relief of anxiety with a decrease in tremulousness. Insomnia became
less, but her depression was unaffected. Placebo regimen resulted
in a recrudescence of her symptoms. The combined (10 mg.) drug
regimen increased the feelings of depression, induced somatic complaints and failed to abate the anxiety. A lowering of her medication
to 5 mg. resulted in a repetition of the period of relief of anxiety
and tremulousness. The patient was discharged, improved, on this
dose of oral reserpine.
R. S., a 19-year-old girl with hebephrenic schizophrenia, was
overactive, anxious, tense, fearful, and manifested both ideas of
reference and auditory hallucinations. Electroshock and insulin
coma therapy afforded her only transient relief. While on 5 mg. drug
regimens, she became less active, less anxious but more depressed.
Her dress became bizarre. When placebo medication was introduced,
her hallucinations ceased, her anxiety was more manifest but the
depressive features were less. On combined drug regimen, she became calmer, more controlled in her behavior, but the bizarre appearance and ideational disturbances persisted.
In these three cases, a relationship between drug regimens and
the relief of anxiety symptoms could be demonstrated. In both M. B.
5

�EVALUATION OF HIGH-DOSE RESERPINE

71

and R. S., the overt manifestations of severe schizophrenia were sufﬁciently modiﬁed to permit participation by the patient in milieu
and psychotherapeutic programs. In the other twelve cases, no such
relationship could be demonstrated.
Of the four cases in whom the drug regimen induced increased
symptoms, each manifested severe depressive feelings, crying spells,
and one, suicidal preoccupations. The following case exempliﬁes
the group.
G. W., a 52-year-old single woman, was admitted with a sevenyear history of depression and hypochondriasis. A previous course of
electroshock therapy was not completed because of injuries sustained
in a fall. She was tense, anxious, tremulous and depressed. While on
drug regimens she became more depressed and retarded. Her anxiety
and agitation increased. With placebo medication there was some
amelioration of these symptoms. Electroshock therapy was instituted.
She received ﬁfteen treatments, with a rapid relief of her tension,
anxiety and depression. She was discharged one month later, much
improved.
There were eight patients in whom the drug regimen or placebo
periods were indistinguishable. There was neither a relief nor an
exaggeration of symptoms. The following case history illustrates
the group.
F. G., a 28-year-old woman, had a two-year history of severe anxiety, tension, feelings of depersonalization and obsessive ruminations
which followed the birth of her ﬁrst child. She had previously been
treated with insulin coma and three courses of electroshock therapy,
with only transient relief. During the periods of reserpine study, she
showed no change in her symptoms while on drug or placebo

regimens.
The changes in behavior determined by psychiatric interviews
and rated according to the Malamud scale are represented in Table
I. In these tables, the ﬁgures represent the total scores for each observation period. The higher scores indicate deviation from more
“normal” behavior. The “control period” is a period of observation
without any drug medication. While the table lists the different
regimens in a deﬁnite sequence, the actual sequence varied from
patient to patient, in a random fashion. A statistical study, using
Wilcoxon’s method of paired replicates, (13) demonstrates no signiﬁcant difference in the group between any of the drug or no-drug
periods.
Because no signiﬁcant change was demonstrated in the study of

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="2">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Published Works</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2444">
                <text>Evaluation of high dose reserpine therapy for the relief of anxiety. Journal of the Hillside Hospital, 5:67-77, 1956.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2445">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2446">
                <text>mfp-02-01-001-18-022</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2447">
                <text>1956</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2448">
                <text>Wachspress, Morton; Blumberg, Arnold G.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Miller, Joseph S. A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2449">
                <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2450">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2451">
                <text>[Preprint] and reprint. Reprint from JOURNAL OF THE HILLSIDE HOSPITAL Volume V April, 1956 Number 2</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2452">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2453">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74447">
                <text>en-US</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81008">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87569">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="94130">
                <text/>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="5">
        <name>Published</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6763" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6572">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/ebad71bc432e0d061b6d76102561eb88.jpg</src>
        <authentication>d26ec53ef5fc55ebe3fcacc96a4b2ac2</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74136">
                <text>Anna Lowenthal</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74137">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74138">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-001</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74140">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74141">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74142">
                <text>Maternal grandmother of Max Fink</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74143">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74144">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87519">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6764" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6573">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/ce1a927f03a0885334cebe3e532e87fc.jpg</src>
        <authentication>a787b4faf4f9a825a0c61436412f1491</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74145">
                <text>Bronia Lowenthal Fink in medical school anatomy class, Vienna, 1922</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74146">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74147">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-002</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74148">
                <text>1922</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74150">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74151">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74152">
                <text>Mother of Max Fink</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74153">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74154">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87520">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6765" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6574">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c9bcff7ab808daf91947155abc826b10.jpg</src>
        <authentication>bb5f4ea36367e11b5dd3430512e88499</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74155">
                <text>Bronia Lowenthal Fink in Vienna, undated</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74156">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74157">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-003</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74159">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74160">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74161">
                <text>Mother of Max Fink</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74162">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74163">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87521">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6766" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6575">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/4ba5e96b945ff650600fd8eebc62b978.jpg</src>
        <authentication>9e63d62436644f7352adb6c407f61300</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74164">
                <text>Bronia Lowenthal Fink in Vienna, undated</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74165">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74166">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-004</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74168">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74169">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74170">
                <text>Mother of Max Fink</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74171">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74172">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87522">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6767" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6576">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/98f5a5a06c57d2e2f02f1dbcc6c9195d.jpg</src>
        <authentication>6777b73026075a1d135fcdc9d1219af9</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74173">
                <text>Bronia Lowenthal Fink and Max Fink, 1923</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74174">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74175">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74176">
                <text>1923</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74178">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74179">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74180">
                <text>Mother of Max Fink</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74181">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74182">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87523">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6768" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6577">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/afa39731a22de12de18235e077c0ce23.jpg</src>
        <authentication>9bcf59795660f4bd6becb133f38a52a1</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74183">
                <text>Herman Lowenthal (bottom, center) and Bronia Lowenthal Fink (top, second from left)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74184">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74185">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74187">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74188">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74189">
                <text>Maternal grandfather of Max Fink</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74190">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74191">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87524">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6769" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6578">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c1adcfc50e8cb270487b43e0a89d86d3.jpg</src>
        <authentication>957379d25c584165ba4c98583bc8031f</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74192">
                <text>Max Fink, high school, 1939</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74193">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74194">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74195">
                <text>1939</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74197">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74198">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74200">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74201">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87525">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6770" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6579">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/65ba6297e407443e5b645f06440831eb.jpg</src>
        <authentication>5742bf256de9eb414b435ed69af6dfe5</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74202">
                <text>Julius Fink and Bronia Lowenthal Fink</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74203">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74204">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-008</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74206">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74207">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74208">
                <text>Father and Mother of Max Fink</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74209">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74210">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87526">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6771" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6580">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/51e43c2b6279ed3231fc821d51cd7972.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f293003cd763a906c079bb313411d56f</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74211">
                <text>Max Fink, ship surgeon, American Export Line, 1948</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74212">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74213">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-009</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74214">
                <text>1948</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74216">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74217">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74219">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74220">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87527">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6772" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6581">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9bde6be6bc795aa367e0ff3ce1a1cf46.jpg</src>
        <authentication>d63c5320d960711e3a969b3b25f295ab</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74221">
                <text>Max Fink, research director at Hillside Hospital, 1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74222">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74223">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74224">
                <text>1955</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74226">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74227">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74229">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74230">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87528">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6773" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6582">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e2dfa694e56791492ce34290f8ee13c6.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f4908ca956dd101ab6f2236cb1a3dcb7</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74231">
                <text>Max Fink, Lieutenant, U.S. Army</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74232">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74233">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74235">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74236">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74238">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74239">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87529">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6774" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6583">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f1e473fb184518ae72cd1702ef7a72f7.jpg</src>
        <authentication>16b46e52874c84a7ad290c767850e3ff</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74240">
                <text>Max Fink, Lieutenant, U.S. Army</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74241">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74242">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74244">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74245">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74247">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74248">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87530">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6775" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6584">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e9c35b476f08f9def6067c31e43766ba.jpg</src>
        <authentication>0f5e91adefcf1752e635029b5132d222</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74249">
                <text>Max Fink, Private first class, U.S. Army, 1943-1945</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74250">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74251">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74252">
                <text>1943-1945</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74254">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74255">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74257">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74258">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87531">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6776" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6585">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2f578bbf612a73467db6914635f7abd6.jpg</src>
        <authentication>d2a0de5cef8c03d255fbfb5d6d39ea67</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74259">
                <text>Max Fink, 1940s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74260">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74261">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-014</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74262">
                <text>1940s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74264">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74265">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74267">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74268">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87532">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6777" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6586">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/e1f21df7afd232472e755adf61dbe7da.jpg</src>
        <authentication>bf0b847c6a59f57ea858fac0fdd5e2ac</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74269">
                <text>Max Fink, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74270">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74271">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-015</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74272">
                <text>2007</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74274">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74275">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74277">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74278">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87533">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6778" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6587">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f3d9fb14b2a5f8dfecb2862c52e52124.jpg</src>
        <authentication>647fa901e61ae5e59271252d4c9e96e7</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74279">
                <text>Max Fink (right) and Edward Shorter, 2006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74280">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74281">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-016</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74282">
                <text>2006</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74284">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74285">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74287">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74288">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87534">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6779" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6588">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/13115a9834bd57ad71f18d39e4271f96.jpg</src>
        <authentication>cba9cbd3d43c44914abb6877a0b218ee</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74289">
                <text>Max Fink, pilot identification and license record, 1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74290">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74291">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74292">
                <text>1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74294">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74295">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74297">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74298">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87535">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6780" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6589">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2ef50e7d426e02889a9c9b6b41b9e30a.jpg</src>
        <authentication>3c467e087aafb1b312cac2a541d432a4</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74299">
                <text>Max Fink, Nykoping, Sweden, 2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74300">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74301">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74302">
                <text>2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74304">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74305">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74307">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74308">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87536">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6781" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6590">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/b3fea1439cf39d58481542317f0d7a56.jpg</src>
        <authentication>d037cfc6cb6328a0c5288a49b0743fdc</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74309">
                <text>Max Fink (center) and Martha Fink (left), undated</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74310">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74311">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74313">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74314">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74316">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74317">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87537">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6782" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6591">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/5ce7d73c53b35688ef49c36f129295be.jpg</src>
        <authentication>4fa67e66a351f53004b75184ec87b37b</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74318">
                <text>Max Fink (left) and Jean Bobon, 1969</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74319">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74320">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-020</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74321">
                <text>1969</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74323">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74324">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74326">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74327">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87538">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6783" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6592">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f0e5d9d531f56323cca97665c0ea6a6c.jpg</src>
        <authentication>21e4fe4b2a226656434d73519da09973</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74328">
                <text>Max Fink (right), Danish University Antidepressant Group, 2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74329">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74330">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74331">
                <text>2011</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74333">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74334">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74336">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74337">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87539">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6784" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6593">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9b0194e8e6e41306ad3951920053d280.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f8c888b317c4eb6d66b8b1b4bc7e8c55</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74338">
                <text>Max Fink (fourth from right) with Journal of ECT editorial board</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74339">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74340">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-022</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74342">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74343">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74345">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74346">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87540">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6785" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6596">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/75d624085f8c0afe37811fb0be99c244.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f4b44170ab8e177aece10929c0bc2fcf</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74347">
                <text>Max Fink, MD (left) and Charles Kellner, MD (right) of the Journal of ECT editorial board</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74348">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74349">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74351">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74352">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74354">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74355">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87541">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6786" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6597">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/21957d69cdbec75a3af3c92b80ba3139.jpg</src>
        <authentication>2c3423c56c5b26408e8014d9fe1ae6cb</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74356">
                <text>Max Fink (center), Taylor Manor Hospital Award, 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74357">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74358">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-024</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74359">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74361">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74362">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74364">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74365">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87542">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6787" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6598">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/34ffc14c69353beb28205e3d083f74c1.jpg</src>
        <authentication>15d767820d5675ff4b8227daac69b607</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74366">
                <text>Max Fink (second, right), Taylor Manor Hospital Award, 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74367">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74368">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-025</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74369">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74371">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74372">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74374">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74375">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87543">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6788" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6599">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/f44d0c2625f1389edfd0c676eea438c3.jpg</src>
        <authentication>207003d989abb5a29d50b834f258c445</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74376">
                <text>Max Fink (right), Taylor Manor Hospital Award, 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74377">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74378">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-026</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74379">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74381">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74382">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74384">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74385">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87544">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6789" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6600">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/1d2bcbef57a00fd9c29be83dab6e11c2.jpg</src>
        <authentication>a350b40dfa079384f6e458cb8cd13966</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74386">
                <text>Max Fink, Taylor Manor Hospital Award, 1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74387">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74388">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-027</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74389">
                <text>1983</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74391">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74392">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74394">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74395">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87545">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6790" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6601">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/9bec4d07db9cc7bbdca592d03c5631f1.jpg</src>
        <authentication>e27ee77bdf6e164226f11d4601b974de</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74396">
                <text>Max Fink (right) and Jules Angst, 2005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74397">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74398">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-028</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74399">
                <text>2005</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74401">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74402">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74404">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74405">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87546">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6791" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6602">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/8fb21cedddcd09ee293085e8ddd43092.jpg</src>
        <authentication>4ccc01813c057ee2539defeddfe0f394</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74406">
                <text>Max Fink (right) and George Kirov, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74407">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74408">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-029</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74409">
                <text>2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74411">
                <text>&lt;a title="Photographs" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85101195" target="_blank"&gt;Photographs&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74412">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74414">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74415">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="87547">
                <text>jpeg</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="6792" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="6603">
        <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/c5ea573b4bf4da79451f414252f59775.jpg</src>
        <authentication>ceab7141f10775850d473faf1dabf449</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="5">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="74135">
                  <text>Photographs</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74416">
                <text>Max Fink (right) and Turan Itil and Helen Itil, Las Vegas, Nevada, circa 1970s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74417">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74418">
                <text>mfp-04-01-001-0-030</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74419">
                <text>c. 1970s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74421">
                <text>Photographs -- Photographs</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="46">
            <name>Relation</name>
            <description>A related resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74422">
                <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74424">
                <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="74425">
                <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1">
        <name>Photographs</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
