<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="6743" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/items/show/6743?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-07T22:57:22+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="6549">
      <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/8ad71ef7a3c44154da4264a3d36d2625.pdf</src>
      <authentication>d939faed36329ffba731bbff9e10004f</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="107154">
                  <text>An

Objective Study of Communication in Psychiatric Interviews

Joseph

Jeffe,

H.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Read

at the

New

York

N.Y.

Divisional MBeting, A.P.A. November, 1957.

Supported by Grant 565561 of the Foundations' Fund for Research in Psychiatry.
14’!

10-1h-S7

�The

clinical interview is the psychiatrist's primary tool for the

diagnosis of psychopathology, the modification of behavior, and the

collection of research data.

Only

in recent years, however,

have the

actual transactions which comprise the interview been studied objectively.
Investigators of the interview have usually employed systems of
content analysis (1), which are based upon various theories of psychodynamics.

Currently, there

is increasing

emphasis upon formal aspects

of interaction such as temporal patterns of speech (1h) drastic change
of subject (3), PHYSiological relationships of the participants (2),

grammatical patterns of language (S, 6, 9), and speech disturbances and

silences (10). These aspects, in contrast to content categories, are

relatively independent of theoretical preconceptions,

and are more

readily

quantified and studied statistically.
In many investigations of these formal variables, however, the

total context of the
interview. These approaches neglect the fact that the psychiatrist is a
participant observer, i.e., a significant variable in the interaction
(11). Others have attempted to control this variable by means of
structured interviews in.which the doctor's contribution is standardized
patient's

communications are abstracted from the

according to a predetermined experimental design (6, 7, 1h). These

structured situations delete the very quality of living relationship that

is the ultimate

concern of the psychotherapist (7).

methods of verbal

We

are in need of

interaction analysis that neither preclude nor

prescribe the doctor's clinical responses.
The

this paper is to present a method of interview
a) is objective and quantitative, b) preserves the

purpose of

analysis which

�.2...

natural patient-therapist relationship,

and

c)

treats the interview

as an integrated system of interpersonal communication. This

is

accom-

plished by including the doctor's usual clinical behavior in the data
to be studied.
the

The raw

material is not the patient's speech, but rather

total verbal output of the

"two person" or "dyadic" group.

�Method:

tape recorded interview

The

is precisely transcribed,

without regard

to the speaker of the words. Careful attention is given to subtle

repetitions such as "I - I mean," "well as - as I say,"
polated expressions such as "you know,"

The

inter"so to speak," "as I said," etc.
and to

transcript is then arbitrarily divided into consecutive units of

100, 50 or 25 words depending on the discreteness of the phenomena to
be investigated. Thus a unit contains contributions of words from either

doctor or patient alone, or from both in varying proportions.
The measurement

applied to these units of dyadic Speech is the typetoken-ratio (TTR). This is an index of the balance between repetition

variety of words (12). The TTR is the ratio of the number of
different words (types), to the total number of words (tokensL in a
sample of language. For example, in a 100 word sample the repetition
of the identical word 100 times in succession would produce the lowest
and

possible ratio of .01
of 1.0 would

different

result

if

(l

type/100 tokens). The highest possible

every one of the 100 successive words were

(100 types/100

tokens). These extremes of stereotypy and

diversity are rarely encountered,
situations (8).
The

i.e.

"word-type,"

ratio

and then only

the numerator of the

in grossly pathological

TTR,

is arbitrarily

defined. All words are different which are pronounced or spelled

differently. Thus, ive, gives, gave, given and gizipgﬂ are considered
different types, as are "know" and "no." Vocalizations not clearly
"

�.u-‘
identifiable as
which

is

words are omitted, with the major exception of

"mmhmm"

a frequent utterance of the interviewer in our records.

Contractions are retained as single words, but vulgarisms such as "I
dunno" are

edited to read "I don't know."

The TTR

scores

is calculated for

is graphically plotted,

additional precision, the units
may be advanced 25 words

the

last half

at

unit

each

as

and the

illustrated in Figures

may be

first half

unit. This often smoothes the resultant curve.
is illustrated in Figure 3.
TTR

have

in a single person's language (12).

1 and

2. For

overlapped, e.g. 50 word units

a time, so that each unit

of the preceding and the

Previous studies of the

pattern of consecutive

is

composed

of

of the subsequent

The

overlapping technique

dealt with the overall average
The

sequential pattern in dyadic language.

present method studies the

�Observations:
In the

last eighteen

months approximately

sixty recorded interviews

this method.

The

material includes forty

patients in all diagnostic categories.

The

dyadic

have been inveStigated by

found to be sensitive

to a variety of clinical

TTR

patterns have been

phenomena

(8). This

report illustrates the changes in language interaction occurring during
the course of hospitalization and therapy, as well as changes in rapport

in individual interviews.

and defensive operations
A

- andic

TTR

Pattern in Clinical Change.

first

Figure 1 shows the pattern of the

three separate

1500 words of

interviews during the clinical course of one patient. The doctor is the

in each. This case

same

was

selected as an unequivocal example of gross

clinical change. In the first interview the patient

was

agitated and

depressed. She refused to be seated and paced about the room, reiterating
stereotyped self-recriminations, crying hysterically, with marked

pressure of speech. At the time of the second interview, following a
course of grand mal electroshock, the clinical picture was grossly altered.
She was

less agitated and

complaining of a memory
appeared

more

deficit.

cooperative, although withdrawn and
On

alert, poised, conversational

insightful.

She had been

The TTR of

later,

discharge two months
and,

she

at times, surprisingly

rated clinically as "recovered."

consecutive 25 word units of interaction, for each of

the three periods described, is graphically represented in Fig. 1.
Consecutive points are connected by lines so that the fluctuations in the
graph

reflect the difference

between successive scores.

The mean TTR

for

�~6-

the complete interview from which these samples were taken is represented

line through each graph.

by a horizontal

strates
The

a

The

fluctuating equilibrium about the

pattern of scores

mean.

interviews of these three successive stages

changes.

The mean

demon-

show a sequence

of

level of the interaction is seen to increase as the

clinical status changes from psychosis to "recovery." There is a concomitant restriction in the amplitude of the pattern, i.e. a decrease in
variation about the mean.
Comment:

The sequence of change

in the

TTR

pattern parallels the progressive

in interpersonal communication that

improvement

clinically.

was apparent

This suggests an approach to the quantification of

clinical

change, defined

as an altered pattern of verbal interaction in the interview.
B

-

in Communication‘within the Interview:

Changes

Figure
shown

2

is

an enlargement of the

in Figure 1.

first

of the three interactions

Here the sequence of changes

within a.single interview

are examined rather than comparing the patterns of successive interviews.
As

described before, the patient was speaking continuously in a disorgan-

ized affective outburst.
mﬂrich

The lower

line indicates the

the interviewer participated. Following

remarks, units

3

-

12

ﬁne

25 word

units in

doctor's introductory

represent the patient's uninterrupted speech.

Wide

oscillations of the pattern are prominent. From samples 13 onwards the
doctor made repeated efforts to communicate with the patient. Two independent judges reviewed the transcribed protocol, and both identified
three areas in which there seemed to be an understandable, rational

�-7interchange between the participants. These periods are labelled
"rapport" in the upper

line.

tions of the pattern are

much

During these three periods the

constricted.

Compare

oscilla-

other non-rapport

periods such as 23-2h and 39-hl, in which the doctor's participation
amplified the oscillations.
Cmmmnh

This

illustrates

a method of quantifying

interpersonal phenomena,

such as the degree of "contact" with a severely disturbed

patient.

The

affective pattern in this patient represents the psychotic integration,

for this reason, the occasional occurnnces of conventional,rational
conversation are described as periods of "rapport." The restriction in

and

the amplitude which characterizes these periods

is similar to the

overall pattern at the time of "recovery."
0

- Analysis
Figure

3

of a Complete Interview.

initial

demonstrates the

dvadic

TTR

analysis of a complete

interview. This interview is the discharge evaluation of a patient
had been hospitalized following a
months of

hospitalization, she

who

bizarre suicide attempt. After seven

had "improved"

clinically. This took the

form of a hypomanic mood and a gross denial of her severe emotional

conflicts.
word

The

interview

units advancing by

is

scored by the method of successive 50

ZS word

steps.

The mean TTR

for the interview

is shown by the horizontal line drawn through the graph. The pattern
falls into several natural segments. There are two areas in which ten
consecutive points fall below the mean (areas h and 7). These are
unusual in this interview. There are also areas of gross deviation

�~8from the mean (such as area

determine our

criteria for

2).

Thus we allow the

phenomena

for persistent changes in the

TTR

to be studied. In general,

we

look

level, gross trends or sudden shifts.

Several of the deviant areas are described to
The

objective pattern to

illustrate the

method.

interview begins with a hypomanic monologue in which the patient

visit

describes her successful

home,

her euphoric outlook and plans for

a rosy future.
Area 2 has been delineated because of gross deviation from the mean.
The

beginning of

this period coincides with

a change of topic to her plans

is interrupted
by a period of confusion as she tries, with some difficulty, to recall
one of the details of the job. The end of the gross fluctuation coincides
with the rationalization "I don't think I'll have too much trouble."
Area h was delineated as one of the two sections in which 10 consecutive
for going back to her job

scores

fall

two days hence.

Her optimism

Its beginning coincides with

below the mean.

about her depression on admission to the hOSpital.

a statement

This area ends with

the lowest score of the interview which,precedes by only a few words a
spontaneous reference to her suicide attempt. This large deviation

at

the end of area h embodies the main characteristics of the following area.
Area 5
The

is characterized

by large

content of this area

attempts to prove

at the

is

how much

fluctuations

above and below the mean.

completely on the theme of suicide. She

live. The doctor's queries
with increasing resistance. In the begin-

she now wants to

end of the period meet

ning of the next segment (area 6) she stubbornly refuses to discuss the

subject of suicide further, at which point she changes the subject
abruptly.

�-9Area

7 was

delineated

on

precipitous drop in the

the basis of
TTR,

criteria. It begins with

”two

a

followed by 10 consecutive scores below

rise. Its

the mean, and ends with an equally abrupt

beginning coincides

with a change of subject by the doctor in the form of a question about
her feelings at that

the "you-me" relationship,
period ends
Area

9

when she

in the interview. This content area, 1.6.

moment

is

at

a very

It

The

of an extremely low score enclosed by two

coincides with a brief mention of a meeting with

a young man who told her how well she looked.

remark and her statement
These examples

repetitive level.

abruptly changes the subject.

is delineated because

large deviations.

pursued

"I decided to get

illustrate areas

him

It

ends with an embarrassed

off the topic."

of disturbance or disequilibrium in

the verbal interaction pattern. In contrast, areas

I

3, 6,,23 and 10 are

areas of relative stability or equilibrium in the record. These stable
areas are marked by a different quality of communication. They consist

either of a euphoric,

hypomanic monologue which avoids

all stressful areas.

or of evasion of the doctor's probing questions by superficial rational-

ization and conventional cliches.
Comment:

Recent reports of objective interview studies using other techniques

(10), have noted that the interaction goes through a series of definable
phases, which

may

and successful defense
and the events
The

stressful disorganization

correspond to periods of

respectively.

The

phases demonstrated here,

that delineate them, suggest

an analogous fonmulation.

content areas that disturbed the pattern in this final interview

�also did so

the

initial

interview seven months earlier. we
anticipate that the discussion of a subject that had resulted in disequilibrium but now no longer does so, may constitute an operational
on

definition of "resolution of an area of conflict."

�Discussion and Conclusions:
Diverse and highly personal interpretations of interview data limit

the growth of psychiatry as a science. Systematic study of the actual

transactions

may

lead to operational definitions of hitherto subjective

it is

likely that the patterns of verbal
diversification presented here constitute part of the subliminal cues to

phenomena.

For example,

therapists
affect, etc.

which

reSpond when.making

clinical

judgments of anxiety,

Objective investigations of the interview must encompass the behavior
of both participants since the events observed are interpersonal processes.

Gill,

Heuman &amp;

Redlich (h) define even the

initial interview

as "the

diagnostic evaluation of an interpersonal relationship." Reusch (13)
has recently stated
have the

that “observations

made

in social situations

characteristics of a scientific procedure in which

do

not

one aSpect

is studied in detail while all other variables are held constant."
The method presented here is an attempt to convert these concepts
into practical research methodology.

It

permits a quantitative statement

of various clinical phenomena occurring either within single interviews
or in the course of therapy. Disturbances of verbal interaction are

defined operationally in terms of the configuration of the

Applications to the definition of clinical change and

pattern.
transactions
TTR

within the interview have been presented.
The TTR

is

only one of many quantifiable aspects of dyadic speech.

interaction, time reference, and relative amounts of participation
doctor and patient may also be measured. Further applications of these

Pace of
by

techniques are under investigation.

�REFERENCES

1. Auld, F.

and Murray,

E.J. (1955): Content-Analysis Studies of

Psychotherapy, Pslchol. Bull. 2a: 377-395.

2. Coleman, R., Greenblatt,

and Solomon, H.C. (1956): Physiological

M.

Evidence of Rapport During Psychotherapeutic Interviews,
Dis . Nerv.

3. Eldred, S.H.,

sttem,

ll:

2-8.
E.R., Salzman, L., Meyersburg,

Hamburg, D.A., IHWOOd,

(l95h):

H.A. and Goodrich, G.

A

Procedure for the Systematic

Analysis of Psychotherapeutic Interviews, §§zchiatry, l1:
337-3h5.

h. Gill,

M., Néwman, R. and Redlich, F.C. (l95b): The

in szchiatric Practice.
Press.
5. Goldman-Eisler, F. (195h):

A

New

York:

Study of Individual Differences and of

Interaction in the Behavior of
Interviews, Jour.. Rent. Sci.
6.

Initial_1ntervigg
International Universities

Some

Aspects of Language in

lQQ: 177-197.

Gottschalk, L.A., Gleser, G.C. and Hambidge,
Behavior Analysis, Arch. Neur. and

G.

(1957): Verbal

ngchiat.,

21; 300-311.

7. Grinker, R.R., Sabshin, M., HaMburg, D.A., Board, F.A., Basowitz, H.,
Korchin,
Use

m?

S.J.,

Persky, H. and Chevalier, J.A. (1957): The

an Anxiety-Producing Interview and

Its

Meaning to the

Subject, Arch. Neur. and Psvchiat., 11: hO6-hl9.
8.

daffe, J.: Language of the Dyad:

A

Method of

Interaction Analysis

in PBychiatric Interviews, Psvchiat , (in press).
9. Lorenz, M. and Cobb, S. (195h): Language Patterns in PBychotic

and

Psychoneurotic Subjects, Arch. Neur. and Pszchiat., 1g: 665-673.

�REFEREEIJCES

lO. Mahl, G.F., (1956): Disturbances and Silences in the Patient's
Speech in Psychotherapy, Jour. Abnorm. Soc. Psxcholu

§_3__:

1-15.

11. Handler,

G. and

Kaplan,

:‘J.K.

(1956): Subjective Evaluation and Re-

enforcing Effect of a Verbal Stimulus, Science,

l2.

Mowrer, O.H. (1953): Verbal Behavior

(Ed.) szchotheragz:

T1139

1.2143

in Paychotherapy. In

582-583.
Mowrer

and Research, New York: Ronald

Press.
13. Ruesch, J. (1957): Disturbed Commnication,

New

York:

11.14".

Norton.

1h. Saslow, G., Matarozzo, J.D. and Guze, S.B. (1955): The Stability of

Interaction Chronograph Patterns in Psychiatric Interviews,
Jour. Consult. P§Xcholu

1.2: 14174430.

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="3">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="3">
                <text>Research Files and Unpublished Works</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67424">
              <text>Joseph Jaffe: An Object Study of Communication in Psychiatric Interviews, 1957</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67425">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67426">
              <text>mfp-03-01-002-8-009</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67427">
              <text>1957</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67428">
              <text>Jaffe, Joseph</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67429">
              <text>&lt;a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021"&gt;Research Files&lt;/a&gt; and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="46">
          <name>Relation</name>
          <description>A related resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67430">
              <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67431">
              <text>Research papers, files, and related correspondence</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67432">
              <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="67433">
              <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="80945">
              <text>en-US</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="87506">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="94067">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="37">
          <name>Contributor</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="100628">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="3">
      <name>Research</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
