http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/371617534179d54e66d61621a46020c8.pdf 6e55d00563bbed3481f9a9906c445b08 PDF Text Text therapy, we hue ahead-red at individul wide response. Subjects duomtrete sue to equivalent number: or induced veriebfljkgy 1n digress of minim. EEG the EEG delta ee’dvity In the observations observed the to teeters of to be reported, the reletien webologic variability is amend. mam Ed Hethod: referred patients consecutive heapi’oelized malty-dive slammed.“ M with wire tested Subjects studied. therapy were ‘ im’TA‘MVvV «Ov1 M W the tor Bottleneck end ~ ~ within a week prior to treatment. fleetreemphllo— wmdompriortotreemnt,endetweek1yintemledunng treatment. The records were wt! for the degree of induced deeoribed< previously indieee £5} activity using quentitetive Bad; petienh wee or imml’bbq Medea-eff. 5? Gem flaw. Reflexeither using week, times a three trotted instruments. I «M—-W-nuzwm: .4- HH' an. -\'. [UK/W Clo.) f‘ru’f a?) �heults: 1. Subjects with 1! and FC human moment (H), fem-color Rorschach responses showed induced delta (PC) significantly lesser activity than subjects who had no such or bath amounts of responses. 2. Subjects with fewer Rorschach responses (R) and fewer total moment (Home) teaponses of delta activity. m 3. . The .. higher the malted simificantly greater degmee Wmmt «L test, the greater the «rot-beers on the degree of induced delta activity. gnawing: These studies describe a consistent tram perceptual responses and 041v w relationship between pre— obeemd degree of phtsiologic alteration following repeated induced cerebral trams. While factors of current, skull resistance, inherent responsivity of brain, 239. may affect the manifest physiologic alteration, that the subject's usual test eeores) affect the the EEG nodes of adaptation (reflected in his pemptnal physiologic response to cannot be viewed as it is also probable tram. In this context, in isolated physiologic index but is seen �Conclusion: Individual differences in the ma activity are related to have Insurer as latter the” differences in perceptual petteme. been shown to reflect pereomlity differencee, we would the individual'e node of adaptation ('persomliW') fl“ Wfiest chengef mtg; Physiologic ‘76 5359:: (me). suggest thet Wed—be We EFFE‘ ’1 \ would conclude that those aspects of experience and edaptetion that effect perceptual trauma. me the to at affect also responsivity tests �It't'f7 7-..“. Psychologic Factors in EEG Reactivity to Induced Cerebral Dysfunction In the course of an investigation of the role of alteration in cerebral function in the changes in behavior induced by convulsive therapy, we have observed a wide individual variability in the wide denonstrate degrees of Subjects response. EEG EEG delta activity to equivalent numbers of induced convu1310ns. In the observations to be reported, the relation of pSychologic factors to the Observed variability is assessed. Subjects and Method: Eightyafive consecutive hospitalized patients referred for electroconvulsive therapy were studied. Subjects wire tested with the Rorschach and the Gottschaldt embedded figure Sinai Modification) within a week test (Battersby — prior to treatment. Electroencephaloat weekly intervals during grams were done prior to treatment, treatment. records were measured for the degree of induced delta The and activity using quantitative indices previously described. Each patient was treated three times a or Medcraft instruments. week, using either Reiter �Results: 1. Subjects with H and FC human movement (M), Rorschach responses showed induced delta form-color (F0) or both significantly lesser activity than subjects who amounts of had no such responses. 2. Subjects with fewer Rorschach responses (R) and fewer total movement (MWFM+m) responses Showed significantly greater degrees of delta activity. 3. The higher the nambeehefepre-treatment error.score on the Gottschaldt test, the greater the degree of induced delta activity. Discussion: These studies describe a consistent relationship between pre- trauma perceptual responses and the observed degree of phisiologic alteration folloWing repeated induced cerebral trauma. While of current, skull resistance, inherent responsivity of brain, may affect the manifest physiologic alteration, that the subject's usual modes EEG etc. also probable of adaptation (reflected in his perceptual test scores) affect the physiologic the it is factors reSponse to trauma. In this context, cannot be viewed as an isolated physiologic index but is seen �activity interpersonal in the setting by influenced as one that is of the test situation. Conclusion: to related are EEezeactivity the Individual differences in have these latter as Insofar differences in perceptual patterns. been shown to reflect personality differences, the individual's mode we would of adaptation ("perSOnality") is related to (EEG). index the physiologic in manifest changes that those aspects of experience and adaptation tests suggest that also affect responsivity of the EEG ‘We would conclude that affect perceptual to trauma. ���_..,,, WWw-w ,, .w ”m.“ "Wm“. ‘WW..‘M_ . ,, ’w m—w"'1"‘mr-' W'sw-m-v-ni w ar— w..,._r..._.c ‘11ij ���EE 4» mm 0%; MW I'quw. ”a Mme-(W “,de '. d2. M + F6. Eneu. MwFt 0“ 2° (FMm) 2o " H. M ‘37) H’ (1.9.) e (:42) 6’40. 3 (I57. ($71 “-— .1 E4“ O'C) H I§ «2.) I2 Sufi.) (4°74 lo (“74) ‘— oS' - Esr' 0-4 .154; -3": �W M l4. 2 ,2, mm“ ' ”W 3‘!!- 4.6 ”M -?.I 2-! c. 2. 3 .0! non-I- ”*Fm-Ihs (a: EJfI-‘Il .(«y-h �������// 7%2.4“; M»! é 4,4...» r9 x‘W W. J , w ’ ., {a 2: % __ A J 7 l:‘&%fiw ¥£a¢v Mcwa ” WM iawzbz %/ A MLW: / WWW/rm! :2, J4 ”Mug: �3.053.567” �/ 4/WUO‘ 7 #- A 1' 011W 4f r - Wu.m 7 ,z, [,5h 7: - r r- Mlv4" ‘ Aw!— 7 7 / 7 A «4.1. / , IJ 7 ‘/ ‘ 7/ M M” by“ W ' Atatu— “ I; AD M144: fl, " 4/ / M: ��Aug/L4. 4» fl AM ' ’4”) . 4,5. (-<.o‘> �A9921 r' ”a“ A/ A/. l‘ “L ‘L; 57”” 13.15” / //. ("/1 . ' .2. w» ‘5: '_ ‘ s M. �'rr' �”921'.“ M We. ’91 / W I ~ ~23; / ('2. 10. U", 2,, �APR V ; q «1 /U 9 I... ’ ,3 / {-91 I “A; "4/4 '2 7 5"7‘ 3’ 01.5, 2 ‘y ‘65 �A98 1.1 ‘ f“ d| -, . /‘~' M, / 21 '5. ����“”92 w 2 M �I --I‘_,4‘L<.Jnu �|| ’7.“ _H I! ll .2./ 2.33 < or �II II II 3;)!“ch "37) II II II II ll II ‘ II ‘I ll ll . 1| II II I! H ll II II II �II . 0!! PC 3 ‘ii W ( II II II II II II II - II . II II II II II II I I II II II II II II II II 2. ���IS. Mpc. had” II” !! 9 7 A?) (33') I‘ll, (0M :9»— “n “I . + a? (I ’ anr9 II II II II II II II II I ll /0 («a (a) f‘Jo 2 II r; 7 I) m“ /.2 + W1 7.3“, —» �93 71$ if ’4'“ I!‘ (L .. _ 4!! f 26“,)" ‘2 ll ”L ‘ ll ’i: __ ,7Or)“ __(z,?)" AI mm" H +»a‘l !! j: (p’ll " “41' 2.9/ {7/ [(2 /‘/£ "2.6 4,527 3.5/3 I??? 45143 57’” 1/4 7 IL/Hs 6 7- 7’- H‘ér ”62.24 49'0L/ 3732, (€42, 27771... 47.31’ (31.54" 64 7) I36 7” W 9 V” ° 2.24 // I42. s39 9 2. - _2_J_'#_.L3_3__ [cor v“ 4"" 3 ' ‘ 4. // .2./“’ 6/70 "22' ‘ I 1 /°:,‘ - ‘ n_fl ”J �f}; 7})“; ‘ .. 44» L .’ 6’ 5" z ’0 , aw ,M p9 , PL; o / ll /!g cll’ I L r /S"' - ’— W a u. / (367») ‘l I! {filfi (’9’; L (Cara) / {d 3 AL” 6? ./o fld 3° / C / “ 3 ‘5' 4' ’L/ f 3 3 �Ill W W #H- m If I . ’Il 4+» u ‘H++- , IIII +H~I~ ~+H+- [III I II I ' Ill ‘ ‘ Nu. m m: #H- m III ink- m . ' II M I H II III "1/ HH- ’I _l I I -1-H+ IN! ' flfi— III I . ' ,I clam ##4- u #44- " 1-m- #+H- l7 Fc. l'7 \‘l cm DC. m: ,,I I I £4 III ,ll +H+ I an ac 'fl-l-L I ' ’ up” II 6172: 1+“ 14H~ 4”. ”II ' II m: N! rm. II 4+"I II III \' ' u {I � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Research Files and Unpublished Works Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Psychological Factors in EEG Reactivity to Induced Cerebral Dysfunction (research), 1957 Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context mfp-03-01-002-9-008 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource <a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank">Fink, Max, 1923-</a> Subject The topic of the resource <a href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85113021">Research Files</a> and Unpublished Works -- Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, 1953-1965 Relation A related resource The Max Fink Collection Description An account of the resource Research papers, files, and related correspondence: research with Robert L. Kahn Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank">IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York). Language A language of the resource en-US Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Research