<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="282" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/items/show/282?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-07T19:13:44+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="73">
      <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/6ae8392f9c68d3b213edf8358a9597ac.pdf</src>
      <authentication>bdf1e6bcabb4c1d8c82905940f4f07c2</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="100699">
                  <text>REPRINTED FROM
E. ROTHLIN
(Editor)

NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
VOL. 2 (1961)
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting
of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum
IBasle 1960

ELSEVIERPUBLISHINGCOMPANY
AMSTERDAM

�Reprinted from: E. ROTHLIN (Editor), Neuro-Psychopharmacology, V01. 2 (1961),
Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale
Ne'uro-Psychopharmacologicum, Basle 1960
‘

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC RESPONSE PATTERNS OF
SOME PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS
MAX POLLACK, ERIC KARP, GEORGE KRAUTHAMER,
DONALD F. KLEIN AND MAX FINK
Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, L.I., N. Y. (U.S.A.)

PROBLEM

This study of the mode of action of some of the newer psychotropic agents was formulated within the framework of a neurophysiologic-adaptive hypothesisl. The concept,
derived from earlier work on convulsive therapiesz, views clinical behavioral change as
a resultant of the interaction of alterations in brain function and the personality of
the subject. The present study emphasizes the question of pattern speciﬁcity of drug
action and its relation to individual differences in behavioral response. The particular
drugs utilized, chlorpromazine3 and imipramine“, were selected on the basis of pilot
studies in this institution in which their effectiveness in altering physiologic and
behavioral patterns had been demonstrated.
This presentation is an interim report of a study currently in progress.
METHOD

Consecutive referrals for drug administration in a voluntary psychiatric hospital were
assigned at random to one of the three drug regimens: (I) chlorpromazine with 1.2%
procyclidine added, (2) imipramine, and a (3) placebo. Medication was administered
in liquid vehicle in a ﬁxed dosage schedule, to a maximum in four weeks. Chlorproma—
zine was begun at 300 mg and increased to 1200 mg daily and imipramine from 75 to
300 mg. Patients continued to be seen three times weekly in individual psychotherapeutic interviews during the period of drug treatment.
Analysis of the data is limited to the ﬁrst 48 cases. These patients are not chronically ill—the majority being admitted for their ﬁrst hospitalization from the community, and a smaller percentage rehospitalized for a recurrence of their illness. Their mean
age was 35.5 years, and years of schooling was 11.9 years. Approximately 57% were
diagnosed in the group of schizophrenias, 28% as affective psychoses and I 5 0/5 psycho—
neuroses and character disorders.
Patients were examined in a four day period prior to drug administration on a
ﬁxed schedule of physiological and psychological procedures which was repeated

during the sixth week of drug treatment.

RESULTS

Group changes in some of the measures with drug treatments are shown in Table I.
The EEG patterns measured quantitatively through electronic frequency analysis5
References

1).

384.

�382

M. POLLACK et

al.

show that imipramine and chlorpromazine differ signiﬁcantly from the control group
and from each other. There was a signiﬁcant reduction in the total electrical activity
in the imipramine group, while there was an increase both in the amount of slow-wave
activity and the slow to fast activity ratios in the chlorpromazine group.
TABLE I
GROUP CHANGES WITH DRUG TREATMENT

EEG
Slow/fast ratio
Total activity
Delta ratio

Control

I rmpramme

Chlarpromazine
w it h Procyc l {dine

0

0

co

0|

++
0
++

Perceptual
Critical ﬂicker fusion 0
Motor
Pursuit—rotor
Tapping speed
Hand steadiness

Intellectual
WechslerBellevue IQ

O
O

++

05
01

——

+

O

O

O

+

o

o

Behavorial rating
Symptom complaint —
0
Depression

+ Increase p.
+ + Increase p.

o

—-

—

o No change

— Decrease
—— Decrease

P
P

0.05
0.01

The reduction in the critical ﬂicker—fusion (CFF) threshold is noted only for the
chlorpromazine group. This test correlated with the increase in EEG slow-wave
activity.The motor tests also reﬂect a differential drug effect with unsteadiness increased by the two drugs, tapping rate unaltered, and pursuit rotor improved only by
the imipramine group. The greatest change in intellectual functioning was scored by
the no-drug group, present to a lesser degree in the imipramine group and absent in
the chlorpromazine group. The lack of equivalent changes for the drug groups may
reﬂect an inhibition of the expected practice effect.
In clinical behavior, all groups showed a reduction in complaints on self-rating
as measured by the Johns Hopkins Scale, with the reduction being greater for the
drug groups. In the Clyde Mood Scale, a Q—sort behavioralrating, there was a quantitative reduction in both the patient’s and the doctor’s ratings of “depression” in the
drug group but not for the control group.
While these data indicate a pattern that suggests differential drug activity, there
was marked heterogeneity within each group on each measure. Table II shows the
changes in CFF for each subject. The number within each box refers to the evaluation
of a change in behavior, rated on a four—point scale by the evaluating psychiatrist.
These are global changes in behavior ratings, and are not necessarily equivalent to
References p. 384.

�NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC RESPONSE PATTERNS

383

ratings of improvement. (Note that the ratings of behavioral change “3” and “4”
were most often associated with changes in CFF of more than one cycle.)
Although the difference in mean CFF score between imipramine and the control
group was not signiﬁcant, the difference in variability (F ratio) was signiﬁcant (P =
0.05). The control group showed a narrow range of change, varying from +1 to ——2
cycles. In contrast, the imipramine group ranged from +2 to ——5 cycles, and chlorpromazine from zero to ——6 cycles. The chlorpromazine group change was in the downward direction only. The individual differences in the alterations of CFF threshold
II

TABLE

CHANGE IN FLICKER FUSION THRESHOLD WITH DRUG TREATMENT
Contrél

+2
+1

o
—1

—2
__3

Imipmmine

2 2 I

4 4 2
I
3 3 1
3 1 1
3
‘

2 2 2 I I
3 I I

1

1

3

1

4 2
4 2

——4

—5
—6

Mean diﬂ.
Change in C.P.S.

Chlorpromazine Behavorial
with Procyclidine
change

2

1

4
4
4
4

4
3 2
3

4
4 3
2

——o.6

——o.4

TABLE

None
Mild
3 Moderate
4 Marked
I
2

——3.1

III

‘CHANGE IN EEG (SLOW/FAST/RATIO) WITH DRUG TREATMENT

1mm
—.4
——.3
——.2

—.1
o

+.1

+.2
+.3

+4
+5

2
2
I
2

1

I

4
I 1
3 2

11
1

443111

3 2

322
4

4 3

4 1 3
4 4 3
4

1

1

1

3

3

1

3:22:22“

INone

2
3

Mild

Moderate
4 Marked

4

+.6

+-7

4
4

&gt;+-7
Mean diff.
Change in slow/fast ratio

firearm

+.026

+.or4

+.401

are also observable in the electroencephalographic indices. Table III shows the changes
in the slow to fast EEG activity ratio demonstrating a wide range in changes for the
controls, a similar pattern for the imipramine group, but a change in only one direc—
tion—that of increased slowing for the chlorpromazine group. The mean increase in
slow-wave activity for the chlorpromazine group was more than I5 times that of the
References p. 384.

�384

M. POLLACK et

al.

control and imipramine groups. There was also a signiﬁcant relation between the increase in slow-wave activity and increasing age with chlorpromazine—older patients
being more susceptible to maximum change.
DISCUSSION

The psychological and EEG ﬁndings show that the agents studied affect these random—
ly selected subjects differentially, producing drug—speciﬁc spectrums of change scores.
This demonstration of drug speciﬁc proﬁles based on multiple tests supports previous
statements by such workers as WIKLER“, LEHMANN7, and KLERMAN et al.8. It should
be noted, however, that these test score proﬁles are contingent on population characteristics and not solely on the biochemical properties of the agents tested. While no
adequate delineation of salient population characteristics is available, two general
schemata are in use—the diagnostic nomenclature, and the concept of ”target symp—
toms”. Neither scheme adequately reﬂects population characteristics, and further
studies of multivariate behavioral, physiologic and psychologic characteristics are
necessary for such delineation. It is thus imperative that drug studies utilize more
detailed analyses of pretreatment physiological and psychological functioning. In the
absence of such methodological reﬁnements, the present confusing and contradictory
data about “drug effects”, “paradoxical reactions”, and imputed speciﬁcities will
continue.
CONCLUSION

I. Pattern speciﬁcities in various tasks can be identiﬁed for group data.
2. Within various groups, individual differences may be great, leading to failure
for some group data to achieve signiﬁcant differences. Further exploration of pattern
speciﬁties for subjects is warranted, using some of the more recent statistical techniques of multivariate analysis.
3. Such pattern speciﬁcities for clusters of subjects may be a more meaningful way
of ordering psychiatric subjects for evaluative studies than conventional nosological
methods.
4. Group data for EEG, CFF and behavior are consistent with neurophysiologic—
adaptive views of drug therapeutic efﬁcacy.
REFERENCES
1

3

3
7

M. FINK, A uniﬁed theory of the action of physiodynamic therapies. ]. Hillside Hosp, 6 (1957)
197.
M. FINK, Effect of anticholinergic compounds on post-convulsive EEG and behavior of psychiatric patients. Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 12 (1960) 359.
M. FINK, R. SHAW, G. GROSS AND F. S. COLEMAN, Comparative study of chlorpromazine and
insulin coma in the therapy of psychosis. ]. Am. Med. Assoc., 166 (1958) 1846.
M. FINK, Electroencephalographic and behavioral effects of Tofranil. Cari. Psychiat. Assoc. f.,
4 (I959) 166 SG. A. ULET’I‘ AND R. G. LOEFFEL, A new resonator-integrator unit for the automatic brain wave
analyser. Electroencephalog. and Clin. Neurophysiol., 5 (1953) 113.
A. WIKLER, The Relation of Psychiatry to Pharmacology, Williams &amp; Wilkins, Baltimore, 1957.
H. E. LEHMANN AND J. CSANK, Differential screening of phrenotropic agents in man. J. Clin.
Exptl. Psychopathol., 18 (1957) 222.
G. L. KLERMAN, A. DIMASCIO, M. GREENBLATT AND M. RINKEL, The inﬂuence of speciﬁc per—
sonality patterns on the effects of phrenotropic agents. In Biological Psychiatry, Grune &amp; Stratton, New York, 1959, pp. 224—239.

Printed in The Netherlands

��IWEGPSIGIGLMIB RESPGISB

'

“runs

at

sons rsrczonorzc nuns

Ha: Fullnek Ph.D., Erie Earp 3.1.
George Krauthunor

Ph.n., Donald 1. Klein

Cad HI! Pink

H.D.

Ht”.

Iran the Dapartnent or Exporinentnl Psychiutry, Hillside Helpital,
Glcn Oaks, 3.1., U.I.
Prouontod at the Second Meeting of the Gdllogiuu Internationale Houro~
Payehophnrnacologicun, Basal, July 1960.

1?: 7/60

�Probles:

_ihis study or the node of action at soae er the never
psychotropic agents was teraulated within the tranework of a
neurophysielogie—adaptive hypothesis (1). The concept, derived
from earlier work on oonvulsive therapies (2), views clinical
behavioral change as a resultant of the interaction of alterations
in brain function and the personality of the subject. the
,present study enphasises the question or pattern specificity
of drug action and its relation to individual differences in
behavioral response. The partieelar drugs utilised, ehler»
proaasine (3) and iaipranine (h), were selected on the basis
of pilot studies in this institution in which their ettectiveu
nose in altering physiologic and behavioral patterns had been
demonstrated.

this preeentatien is
currently in progress.

an

interil report

of a study

�hethed:
VIGonseestiye

referrals for

drug

adninistratien in a

voluntary psychiatric hospital were assigned at render to
one of the three drug regimens - (1) ohlorpronasine with
1.21 preoyelidine added, (2) inipraaine, and a (3) plaeebo.
Hedioatien vas adainietered in liquid vehicle in a fixed
dosage schedule, to a saxiaua in tour weeks. chlorproaasine was
begun at 300 as. and increased to 1200 :3. daily and iaipraaine
tree 75 to 300 as. Patients continued to be seen three times
weekly in individual payohotherapeatio interviews during the
period of drug treataent.
Analysis of the data is liaited to the first us cases.
These patients are notohrenioally ill - the majority being
adaitted for their first hospitalisation free the ooaaenity,
and a saaller percentage rehoepitalised for a recurrence or their
illness. Their mean age was 35.5 years, and yeare of schooling
was 11.9 years. Apprexiaetel! 575 were diagnosed in the group
or sohisophrenias, 281 as affective psychoses and 15S psyche‘
neuroses and eharaoter disorders.
Patients were exaained in a four day period prior to drug
adainistration on a fixed schedule or physiological and psyche—
legieal prooederee which was repeated iering the sixth week of
drug

treataent.

�Results:
in cone of the aeaeoree with drug treataente
in the figure I. the EEG patterns aeaeored

Group changes

are

shown

--~----~--“-.
FIGURE I

..—..'.....u.

quantitatively through electronic frequency analyeie (5) show
that inipranine and ohloryronaeine differ significantly from
the control group and from each other. There was a eignificant
reduction in the total electrical activity in the inipranine
group, while there wee an increase both in the amount of slow
ahd
wave activity
the slow to test activity ratio: in the
chlorpronaeine group.
-Thc reduction in the critical flickerotueien (CPI) threehold
ie noted only for the chlorproxaaine group. Thin test
correlated with the increase in EEG elow wave activity. The
rotor tests also reflect a differential drug effect with
uneteadieeee increased by the two drugs, ﬁapping rate unaltered,
and pursuit rotor inproved only by the igipranine group. The
the
greatest change in intellectual functionihg rae scored by
no-drug group, preeeut to a leeeer degree in the iaipraaine
group and absent in the chlorprenaeine group. the lack of
equivalent changes for the drug grounsnay reflect an inhibition
of the expected practice effect.
In clinical behavior, all groups showed a reduction in
coupleinte on self-rating ae measured by the Johne napkins
Scale, with the reduction being greater for the drug groups.

�.h’
611d.
In the
load 80:10, 3 Q-Iort bohuviornl rttilg, that.
an. a qunatitt‘ivo iodnction in both tho pntaoat'n and tho

dﬁﬂttr'. 2:11:33 a: 'dcprocttun' in

tn. contrcl

ﬁhc drug grvup but

‘ot (tr

group.
#311. than. du$t indicatc s ptttorn thnt angg-ata
dittorontiul drug tcttvlﬁy, ‘horo w‘u narkad ho‘crogonuity
within tuck grvup an Oneh nonairo. Fitlrc 2 pluts at. ohnngca

------”--‘
FIGURE 2

ouudunouca

in ctr tar itch aubaoe‘. rho nunbtr within Ouch ban rotort. the 07:1tatton o: n «inn;- tn bahnviur, rated on t tour-point
.031. by sh. ovnlnuting pnynhtutrtnt. it... ‘20 glohnl ch18...
13 bchuvior ratiuga, and gr. not uncocaarily‘oquavglnnt #0
rating. it ingrQVCIdnt. (lot. that £ho ratttan c: habnvtorul

'3' tld 'h' IIII

aunt often ussoctutcd with ehnngnl 1n
err-o: uni. than on. cycle)
Althodgh tbs d1£t¢rcnoo in 3033 err near. botviun
'tltpruutno and tho «Chiral group van tot signitiegnt, 6h:
atttorcnco 1: vartthtltﬁy (1 ratio) III utgnizicgnt (p .o;).
admiral
It.
gran; unused u narruv r.n¢c at chgngo, vnryiu;
chaago

Iran
tron

to n! 31:10:. In contrast; tut Slipranlno xrtup :;n¢od
+2 tn -5 grains, and chlarpzalnsinn (ran not. to -6 cyclan.
Ina chlorprunalinn stump chang- vas a: Shh downward atroction
only. the 1nd£v1dnu1 dittorono¢n ta thn t1¢irtiiill If G?!
tarantula 1:. .13d ohaorvahln 13 thn olaotro.ncopha10¢raph1¢
«an... run:- 3 an: tho clung“ 1a a. :1» u
no «any;
+1

an

�-5...

ﬁ.‘ﬂ---‘ﬂ“.119333 3

O‘ﬂumnabndou

ratio demonstrating a wide range in changes fer the controls,
a eiailar pattern tor the 1a1praaine group, but a change in
enly one direction that of increaaed slewing fer the chlorpreaaaina sweep. The teen increase in elev wave activity
for the ehlorpreaaaine group was more than 15 tines that or
—

the central and 1a1praaine groupe. there was also a
aignifieant relation between the increaee in aloe wave
activity and increasing age with chlorpreaaaine - elder

patiente being late eneceptible te naxinna change.

�Dieeeeeion:

psychological and £36 findings ehoe that the
agente etudied affect theee randomly eeleoted eubjecte
differentially, producing drug-epocitio epoctroae or change
eooree. This deeonotration or drug epocitic profiles
based on multiple tests supports previoue statements by ouch
The

(7), and Klenaan et al (8).
It ehould be noted, however, that theee toot ecore profiles
are contingent on population ohareoterietioa and not eolely
on the biochemical propertiee e: the agente tested. While
no adeqoete delineation of eelient population oheraoterietice
ie available, two general eohenata are in nee ~ the diagnoetio
neaenclatore, and the concept or I"tax-got eynpteae'. leither
ooheee adequately retleete population oharaoterietioe, and
further otudiee of multivariate behavioral, phyeiologio end
peyohelogio oharaoterietioe are neeeeeary for each delineation.
It in thee imperative that drug etodiee utilise more detailed
analyses or pretreataent psychological and physiological
toentioning. In the abeenoe or euoh aethodological refinements,
the present confueing and contradictory data about ”drug
effects", "paradoxical reactions“, and iapeted epeoiiicitiee
will continue.
workere ao Wikler

(6),

Lohmann

�Conclueieﬁ:
(1) ~Psttern

speeifieities
identified for group dsts.

1n

vsrieus tasks can be

differencss
individusl
various
Within
groups,
(2)
to
dsts
sons
for
group
to
failure
be
lesding
great,
as:
of
Further
explorstien
differences.
sehisve signifiesnt
some
using
usrrsntsd,
is
for
subjects
psttsra speeitities
of the nets recent ststistiesl techniques at nultivsrists
snslysis.
or
clusters
for
Bush
(3)
pattern speeitieities
of
psychistrie
ordering
he
nssniugful
we:
nsre
s
nsy
sabjsets
nsselegiesl
eenventiensl
thsa
studies
evaluative
for
subjects

methods.

.

(h) ﬁreup dsts fer use, err and behsvier sre eensistent
with nearephysielsgie-sdspt1ts views 9! drug therspeutic

etilesey.

�‘8REFEREHGES

tho
Action
or
of
Thoory
Enitiod
Physiodynonic
i
Thoropioo. J. Hillaido IOIE. é; 197~206, 1957.
2. link, H: Effect of Anticholinorgio Gonpoundo on Poot~
convulsivo BEG ond Behavior of Psychiatric Potionto.
E30 6113. lcurophyoiol. $3: 359-369, 1960
3. Pink, H., Show, 3., Grout, G. and Calcium, 1.8.
Corporativo Study of chlorprouojino onc Insulin Geno in
the therapy or Poychoéis. J. inor. nod. Aoooc. ;§gs
18h6~18§0, i958.
h. rink, H: Electroencephalographic and Behavioral
Effects of Torronil. Gonna. Pczch. Assoc. J. g. 166$~1718,

1. rink,

K:

1959.

Blott, G.A., Ind Lootfcl, 3.6. A new resonator1ntogrotor unit for the antarctic brain wave onolyaor.
Clio. Houroghzaiol., g} 113-115, 1953.
6. Viklor, A.: 2&amp;0 Relation of Pazchiotrz to Phornocologz,
an. a Wilkins, Boltinoro, 1957.
Lohnonn, B.E. and Crank, 3.: Bittorontioi scrocning or
Phronotropic Agents in Hon. J. Olin. Razor. Pczchogothol.
EEG

lg:

222—235, 1957.

Klornan, 0.1., Dixaccio, L., ﬁrocnblott, K. and Rinkol, H:
the Influence of Specific Personality Pottcrnc on the

Effects of Phrcnotropio Agents. Biological Pazchiotrz,
Gruno

&amp;

Strottcn,

New

York, 22h-239, 1959.

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="2">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2">
                <text>Published Works</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2814">
              <text>Neuropsychologic response patterns of some psychotropic drugs. In E. Rothlin (ed.), Neuro-psychopharmacology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1961, 2:381-4</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2815">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2816">
              <text>mfp-02-01-003-50-016</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2817">
              <text>1961</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2818">
              <text>Pollack, Max; Karp, Eric; Krauthamer; Klein, Donald F.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2819">
              <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="46">
          <name>Relation</name>
          <description>A related resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2820">
              <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2821">
              <text>Reprint and [preprint]. REPRINTED FROM E.ROTHLIN (Editor) NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY VOL. 2 (1961). Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting of the Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum Basle 1960</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2822">
              <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2823">
              <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="74484">
              <text>en-US</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="81045">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="87606">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="37">
          <name>Contributor</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="94167">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="5">
      <name>Published</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
