http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/5fa4079505cc03869097f8b4c7fe020d.pdf e17c751ff2a6717145ddd6eee9943e6a PDF Text Text November 25. 1966 Dr. Donald M. Shapiro Washington University Computer Center Sever Hall Lindell and Skinkar Blvd. ‘ St. Louis, Missouri 63130 Dear Don, _.,,,.A.,_,wr.- .v...‘ _. t . .. . V”, .~ w --‘.-. .-. ‘4‘! A)“. -.—<- I have reviewed the graphs and the data which you gave me of the barbiturate—stimulant EEG study with a View to selecting the EEG criteria which.may best characterize the drug related changes. First, I emphasized those variables which had at least four periods of significant differences of the twenty time periods studied. After that, I reviewed each of the graphs for "trends" in order to select additional variables. It soon became apparent that on a number of items, the various drugs could be distinguished at different time periods identified in the attached table. We have the drug III and IV, lesser for greatest number of criteria for I and II, and least for drug V. with this table in mind, I would recommend that the discriminant and theSe are criteria: analyses be based onthe fellowing Items -- 2 and 13 because they are the only ones fer drug five. vywwx::tv“‘-'> Items 3, 5, 10 and 13 because they are detexudnants 2'.- for a variety of periods «Ir-yams and various drugs. Mam ‘Items .'137} 11-3 marry-v. » <y -r “Al-49'“? Wafer-tap??? a” a, Y“.U:L.-!Nv'-m_uw-v ‘2, _ 17 or 18 ~ these Seem to go in parallel and is probably satisfactory. Item u is useful for drug III. There are other‘ determinants at the time periods and this may be one or the other deleted. ‘ �Dr. Shapiro so -2- Novenber 25, 1966 While there may be other ways seems to be the easiest and far items be used in the next analysis. I will call you early in the of selecting criteria, this I would suggest that these week. Many thanks. Sincerely yours , Fink, M.D. Professor of Psychiatry Max 1‘1!"sz cc: Dr. Itil Miss Hickman _ ”Ska" . .‘ fix—7v .u.‘ ~.—«_,.:rv3r_-v.na—.j..g;7w,, � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence to: Shapiro, Donald M. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context mfp-05-00-020-8-514 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1966 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource <a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank">Fink, Max, 1923-</a> Subject The topic of the resource Correspondence -- Correspondence Relation A related resource The Max Fink Collection Description An account of the resource Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank">IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York). Language A language of the resource en-US Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Correspondence