<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="253" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/items/show/253?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-07T19:13:33+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="44">
      <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/2e0c07f8713070c07cedfceccd13935e.pdf</src>
      <authentication>f963256ba3adedd04d38ff5d4403fc1f</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="100670">
                  <text>Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy

in a Voluntary Mantel Hospital

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Max

From

Fink,

M.D.

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by Grant Me927 of the National

Health Service.
10-8-57

N.Y.

Institute of Mantel Health, U.S. Public

j

M M

3:)

�Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between social

class

and

illness (3, 5, 6,
and

and incidence of mental

psychiatric disorder with respect to type

therapeutic

selection

13, 1h),

outcome (10).

The

and maintenance of treatment (2,

6, 15),

present study is concerned with social

factors in the selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Bollingshead, Redlich and their co—workers
(3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of

classes

New Haven was

divided into five social

basis of weighted criteria of education, occupation

on the

of residence.

Of

the residents

who were under

and place

psychiatric care, those

from

the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while
organic treatment or custodial care
Of

was more common among

the psychotherapies, psychoanalysis

groups.

was

entirely restricted to the

two upper

Social class was the predominant determinant of the type of treatment

selected even
as follows:

when

the diagnosis

"..... it is

found

was

held constant. They summarize their results

that treatment does not

and medical determinants alone, but on the

well.

the lower classes.

depend on psychological

status position of the patient as

degree
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high

to the upper social levels.

The

data of this study

would seem

to indicate that

most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where the background of the patient

is similar to that of the therapist" (15).

It is

possible to relate the results obtained from these

community

studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the

�- 2 -

extent and type of treatment facilities available.

A

more

critical test of the

importance of social factors affecting choice of treatment would be in a setting

therapeutic techniques and services are available to

where the same

This requirement

is

met

all patients.

at Hillside Hospital. It is a non-profit,

sectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with "early
curable mental symptoms" (h),
pay.

are admitted regardless of their

and

ability to

criteria for accepting patients is their "ability to

of the main

One

who

non-

participate profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy

available

is regarded as the

when needed.

primary method of treatment with organic therapies

The average

length of hospital stay

is six

months,

al-

though some patients remain for as long as a year.
The

present investigation is

of electroshock therapy.

an outgrowth of

In previous work

several years of study

it has been

shown

that certain

aspects of personality were significantly related to patient selection and

therapeutic efficacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose

patients differ

of the present study

from those

was

to determine whether electroshock

receiving other forms of treatment in regard to

cultural background, including such factors as education
and

personality as measured by the California

F

and place

of birth,

scale (1); secondly, whether

these factors were also related to referral for adjunctive hoSpital services.

�m:

Population:

as of March 7,

The

1957 was

entire in-patient adult population of Hillside Hbspital

studied. This constituted a total of

ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a

mean

172

of 3h.6, and including

patients,

58 men and

11h women.

1) The population was subdivided

Procedure:

into three groups according

to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy, (b) insulin

coma

therapy,

and (c) psychotherapy only. *

2) The groups were compared for age, education and place

of birth.
I

3)

of the California

naire (see

F

All patients

were

tested

scale suggested by Levinson (9).

Appendix) which has been

The F

scale

The

patient reads ten statements

indicates whether he agrees or disagrees with each statement

tent.

The

and

score given for each item ranges from one to seven and the

score range is

tained.

is a question-

related to such factors as authoritarianism,

acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
and

** with a ten-item.modification

The

10

to 70.

The

to what ex-

total

greater the agreement the higher the score

ob—

statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this
management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data was
included in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subJects.

* All

patients were tested with the F scale
prior to treatment. In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on march 7th their pre-treatment scores were used in the statistical compar-

** As

part of

ison since
treatment.

an ongoing study

all the

EST

it had been found that EST

significantly affects the score during

�-uh) The population was subdivided in regard

of certain adjunctive services in the hospital.

Among

to utilization

such services available

are group

activities, occupational therapy, psychological testing

therapy.

The

latter is a diagnostic

and

and

creative

therapeutic service consisting of a

series of controlled painting procedures which are considered to be analogies
of

life experience (18). Psychological testing

and creative therapy were

selected for this study because both require a specific referral from the

therapist.

�RESULTS:

data

The

1) comparison of the treatment

was analyzed as follows:

scores and place of
groups for age, education, F scale
where diagnosis

is held constant,

prior to treatment,

birth, 2) comparison

significance of length of hospitalization

3)

and h) comparison between groups

referred for adjunctive

hospital services.

I.

Comparison of Treatment Groups:

For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard devia-

-tions for the
Table

I.

F

scale scores,

The EST group had

age and years of schooling are presented in

higher

P

scores,

was

older and had fewer years

of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These

differences
reach

were

statistically significant for

statistical significance for education.

cation to differentiate the groups
electroshock group contained

many

was due,

F

score and age but failed to

The

failure of years of edu-

in part, to the fact that the

foreign born patients whose education

was

treatment groups were subdivided into

difficult to evaluate accurately.

When

number of

eight years of education, the difference

was

patients

above and below

significant at the .01 level.

not differ

statistically for

The

insulin

any of these

and psychotherapy groups did

factors.

�Hague

uwumuom

auom

$5

$5

nMﬁmnom

m
mo

2
$3

Agooav

muwam
awamuom

.nuom

no

modem
m&gt;ﬁuaz

nvuwm

amousm

a

m

m

383

“somv

33$

mm

mﬂ

8

$8

Aﬂoav

no

qmﬁwuom

$8

anon

a

nowpwoscm

um

anon

can

muaam

wkﬁd

.ummm

3me
nuhum

o

nahwm

m

$ﬁ&gt;u%

ma

once

$8

.mw&lt;

H
6m-

.cm

no

auhoom

we

0

b

made»

How

0

8H

$5

Ammv

:5

m

H

.~

m;

w.m

*Réudx

.cm

am

Ho

unmanamua

ma

aonm

mqmdg

masono

a.

$8

Aﬁmmv

mummy

cams

8.3

«a

0.3

H.ma

8;:

m.:

can:

mi

m.mm

3m

am

93

m.ma

9.:

gums

3:

am

p

***om.w

dﬁa

m.w

N.H

a

***mm.a

***ww.m

m:.~

mm.”

H.H

m&gt;.H

pnmnwuhan

mw¢

can:

.33

~.m

o.m

&gt;.:H

mo

nomwnmmsoo

a

**Aa.m

mm.

m&gt;.m

Hm&gt;oﬁ
amped

Hm&gt;ma

no.

do.

«a

pa

pa

pauu««Hanm

aguoﬁqumﬁw

endowmﬁnwam

macaw

m

can:

9.3

9%

m.Hm

ado: .&amp;B

~.m

o.ma

so:

”om“

G3
nonu
naasmnu

9%

Hoe.

uonuhmmanwaamnm

madamnH.amm

nacho

m.m

Rama»
mm

-onohnm.emm

mgauon»

ammumnp

*

**
K

***

�-

-

7

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign born patients

than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group being highest of
Among

the foreign born patients, those

who came from

all.

Eastern European countries

received somatic therapy predominantly, while the majority of those from Western
Europe reneived psychotherapy alone.

II.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation
The

to Diagnosis:

diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable

to those reported in previous studies of the hospital population (12).

Of

the

fl72 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as psychotic depression,
32

as psychoneurosis and two with other diagnoses.

portion of the depressed patients
with other diagnoses.

To

(52%)

As

expected, a larger pro-

received electroshock than did those

control for the factor of diagnosis in choice or

treatment, the psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those
received electroshock and those
are

shown

who

were given psychotherapy alone.

.02

The

results

in Table II.
While the two groups were comparable

shock

who

patients had a

much

level of confidence.

higher

It is

mean F

for

age and education, the

electro-

score, a difference significant at the

also demonstrated that a significantly higher

proportion of the electroshock patients were born in Eastern Europe.

�‘hmavo

aﬁmv

as:

a

a

Agmmv

:83

nunwm

no

nnmpmmm

muonsm

ma

unusuauua

m
#moi

madam

Aﬁmmv

mo

m&gt;apaz

333
u,

whom

ma

NN

mm

mumwa

0903

$8

anoumhuwn

Aaawv.wm
.usdm

no

w
Mo
cwbaoumm

mm
Pm...”

m
Ammmv

mama»
soamm

3?:

u

m

a

NN

3.:

a

p

cams.

m.o~

0.2

am

:.mH

.92

spas

gum:

0.0:

9S

mpnuupdm

am

0a:
HH
.ust

IQ-

mm

mama
noummohmmn

no
uuaow

$03

.MHS

p

canonohmm

mad

omd

mN.o

mmm.

m.ma

{3

m.om

0.3

9602

33.3

v

No.0

*m:.m

muoom

mo

m
can:

502

.935

0N6
Hm&gt;oH

nomuhdmaco

mo.

pa

as

pnwowgﬁamum

namv

3203393
-ongmmm.amm

hmdhmﬁ.

9mm

b

it;

*

�-9.
III.

Comparison of Electroshock

Patients According to Length of Hospitalization

Prior to Treatment:
While the electroshock
from those

receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there

intra-group differences.
postulated that the

To account

While most of the

less than three

months

for

some

were

who

EST

scores and were older were treated
Place of birth

h0%

months were born

earlier than the

is also a significant factor.

cance, although

28%

in the U.S.

The

were

also

compared according

Patients

who had

on

higher

younger and lower F scale
While hh% of those

all patients referred after
data

was

referred after a period

were

III the patients are

within three months were foreign born,

six

it

were placed on treatment

to the period of hospitalization prior to electroshock.

groups.

considerable

of these differences

received

after admission, about
In Table

to differ

patient was referred for electro-

which a given

patients

of three to twelve months.

F

still

shown

factors involved in selection of treatment

same

related to the readiness with
shock.

patients, as a group, have been

education Just

treated

a period of

fails of signifi-

of those treated earlier had less than eight years of

edu—

cation.
IV.

Use

of Adignctive Hospital Services:
Comparison of the

logical testing is

shown

patients referred for creative therapy

in Table

IV.

It is clear that

of these procedures had significantly lower
more education and more were

for these services.

F

and psycho~

those referred for either

scores, were younger_in age, had

native born than patients

who were

not referred

�.350

Agmv

m

Agmmv

nuHHm

cumwmmm

0935

Mo

NH

o

o

haemv

o

m
*ma.m

pamapmmne

madam

0p

“away

Aﬁowv

ma

w

AgooHv

u

m&gt;wuwz

anon

Ha

N

x

nownm

933
Ammuv

Aﬁomv

mm

m

no

m

mo
noﬁpduwawpwmmom

Aaooav

HH

maﬁpwuscm

made»

w

mm.:

0

Agmmv

Agoav

m

H

an

&gt;.m

m.m

o.m

gm:

m.m

».ad

m.mH

333

mo

a

N

x

HHH
nnwan
'0‘"-

no

mqm¢9

on

p

aw.”

mm.o

mm.o

aoavmosu

mama»

cams

mm.H

.Muaa

Hm.a

Po.nw*wm.m
mnwcnoou&lt;

am

m.ma

m.ma

m.oa

30E

m.m;

w.mm

H.om

u

FH.H

Hw.H

mm¢
Hp.m
mpqmwgwm

m~.m

swag».meg

‘

~:.mnwrmw.m

mm

9mm

o.:a

w.HH

a

m.~H

mm.a

mm.a

,

_

macaw

mo

m

new:

H.a:

~.N:

m.mm

mama

.Mqu

m:.m

m~.m

ma.ma

nomwuwmaco

ncwpcuﬁawpunmom

.moa

Hmpmﬂ

mo.

Ho.

pa

96

AHHV

Ammv

angdwha

Hm&gt;oH

Aoﬂv

.mos

:

u

.moa

.woa

.noa

.moa

n

m
mo

nvmumq

m

m

.moa

on

nova

gang

swap

mama

w

m
0p

m

mama

can»

pnaowwﬂnmﬁm

pqaoﬁmﬁnmﬁm

nun»

can»

m
on
mama

m

m
.moa

on
mnoz

mama

mm
.moa

whoa

«nos

m

*

**

�nmnpo

hmmnmna

$8

Away

m

m

Asmav

m

Aamv

m

npuwm

a3

Amwmv

Aﬁmv

cnmpmdm

#

muonsm

m&gt;wpwmuo

A

mo

mm

Aﬁmav

ma
*mm.m

*mm.®

$3

mqwam

cam

hﬁmwv

Agapv

Aﬁmpv

u

u
m&gt;w¢dz

upon

mwﬁpmme

3

a»

ﬂame

Amway

Aapmv

“*pmv

8

mm

my

mm

MN

am

H»

«x

whoa

no
Haowwoaonommm

m

mo

*mm.:

mowpmosum

*mm.m
mndow

m

mo

soamm

:5

Awmav

Aﬁmv

a

A$MHV

n

H

ma

mtm

H.:

Nx

m

«x

ma

&gt;H

p

mwuw&gt;hmm

am

IHHI
mgm¢H

m.m

mm.m

mo

***&gt;.m

m».H

aowpwuscm

mama;

can;

3;

aw

v.0“

«.mH

m.HH

m&gt;ﬁponmmd¢

m.mw**om.:

mm

no“

O.H

h%ﬁ

add

m.ma

5mm

m.mm

m.HH

p

:.ma

mm.m

om¢

o.&gt;
cams.

p.0m

p.»m

mam:

.men

H.oa***mm.m

a

dmunmwmm

am

3:

m.m~

cum:

9mm

p.m:

w.:~

m.ma

r*wm.m

choom

mgqmwpwm

m

H.mm

$.H:

can:

.umﬁn

m.w

m.:a

rm&gt;¢r
amped

Ho&gt;oa

mo
mo. Ho.

:8

pa pa pa

amoavhmanona

Appv

newwnwmabo

3239
mumua

«CC.

Ammv

.a.o
pnmUHuHamHm

pacuHMwumHm

*

**

HQNUﬁMHanm

oz

mmsouo

.Hoaohmm

m&gt;wpmmuo

mummy

:.Honommm

8385

.Honoamm

oz

oz

.a.o

oz

***

�DISCUSSlON:

results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of birth

The

and F

scale score

were

significantly related to the type of therapy received

and

to the utilization of adjunctive services in this hospital.

Psychotherapy was

the treatment of choice for those patients

better educated,

native born

and had lower F scores.

Such

who were younger,

patients

were

also referred

more

frequently for the auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and
creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores,
were

older, poorly educated

were most

likely to

be

and foreign born,

referred for

EST.

particularly in Eastern Europe,

These

patients

infrequently

were

referred for psychological tests or for creative therapy. Furthermore, these
relationships

were

still

significant when diagnosis

was

held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of Hbllingshead, Redlich
and

their co-workers (3, 5, 6, 13,

15) who demonstrated

related to the type of therapy received in a

community.

that social factors are
The

present study

demonstrates that such factors are also significant in a hospital setting where

ability to pay is not a criteria of therapeutic selection and
of therapy are equally available to the
With

financial aspects

and the

where

all

forms

entire population.
availability of therapeutic facilities

eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the selection
of treatment, two alternative interpretations

factors

may

of therapy.

may be

considered.

The

social

relate directly to the empirically established criteria for choice
On

this basis a patient is referred for electroshock because

older, poorly educated or foreign born, clinical experience having

shown

he

that

is

�such persons respond best to
adequate since

13

-

this type of treatment. This explanation is in-

half the patients with psychotic depression received psychotherapy

alone, even though electroshock

is generally considered the treatment of choice

for this illness.
An

alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to

‘choice of treatment because they

also affect certain psychological patterns of

behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy, such as

mode

of

communi-

cation. Thus, a patient is not referred for electroshock because he is foreign
born or poorly educated, but

rather, these factors provide the difference in

cultural background between patient

and

therapist

which makes successful communi»

cation less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship.

Robinson 33 EE' (15)

in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that psychotherapy is
most

likely to take place

where the

cultural background of the patient is similar

to that of the therapist. Conversely, patient-therapist differences in systems
of value and communication may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic rela-

tionship. In the present study, similarly, the patients

who

received psycho-

therapy alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors studied.*
Apart from the problem of

patient-therapist differences, certain patterns

of communication exhibited by the patient may be

intrinsically incompatible with

the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have

score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9.
Sixteen percent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education
was over 20.

* The 18

therapists had a

mean F

�-1ushown

that verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy

and use of cliches are

patterns appear to be

likely to receive electroshock (7, 8).
more frequent

Such language

in persons with poorer socio-cultural back-

grounds.

Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect on

cation patterns,

that,

has noted

may

communi~

also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler (11)
patients diagnosed as schizophrenic, differences in

among

symptoms

are related to differences in cultural background. Frank gg'gl. (2), studying
psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose

symptoms were

expressed

in somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those
mained had

ideational

shock patients (8)

we

In a study of personality factors in electro-

have noted

that certain patterns of symbolic value

The F scale

and

likely to be associated with the development of a
The

indicates that

symptoms

re-

symptoms.

communication were more

depressive psychosis.

who

relationship between communication pattern

symptoms themselves

are a

mode

and

of communication.

furnishes a quantifiable index of attitude and communication

patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers were less receptive to entering a
psychotherapeutic relationship and were more likely to receive electroshock.
Tougas (17), using an

ethocentric scale similar to the

F

scale, found that

psychotherapy was more effective in patients with low scores.

study the

F

scale

was

In the present

the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment

groups.
These

results have clinical as well as theoretical significance.

�-

15

-

Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that lowbscorers on
the

F

scale have a poor response to electroshock,

and

that those with high

F

scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone. Another clinical application
may be

in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient.

This may be done by minimizing

closely for

age and place of

necessity for developing new

their social differences,

by matching them more

birth. 0f possible greater importance is the
modes

of communication when treating patients

who

are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic approaches.*
While epidemiological

studies have clearly structured

some

of the

problems involved in selection of treatment, and have indicated the direction

of further study,

it still remains

for

more process~oriented

definitive answers.

* See Esecover's

presentation of this topic in this issue.

research to provide

�-

16

-

SUMMARY:

1.

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection

of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which

all

forms of therapy were

equally available, education, age, place of birth and score on the California
F

scale were significantly related to the type of therapy received and to the

utilization of adJunctive hospital services.
2. Patients
and were
be

who were

older, poorly educated, had higher

foreign born, particularly in Eastern Europe,

referred for electroshock.

those patients

who most

were most

F

scores

likely to

Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for

closely resembled the therapist in these aspects.
were present even when diagnosis was held

3.

These

relationships

h.

Among

the electroshock patients the

constant.
significant in choice of therapy
which a

patient
5.

was

It is

were

same

factors found to be

also related to the readiness with

referred for electroshock.
postulated that treatment selection is the result of the

communicative interaction between patient and
be important insofar as they are

therapist. Social factors

may

related to different modes of communication.

�-

17

-

REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., FrankeloBrunswik,

(1950):
&amp;

The

E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford,

Authoritarian Personality,

New

R.N.

York: Harper

Brothers.

Frank, J.D., Gliedman, L.H., Imber, S.D., Nash, E.H. and Stone, A.R.
(1957):

Why

Neurol.

Am.

Leave Psychotherapy, A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat., 11; 283-299.

&amp;

Freedman, L.Z. and

Patients

Hollingsheadﬁj. (1957): Neurosis

J. Psychiat.,

Hillside Hospital, 29th

113: 769-775.

Annual Report, 1956.

Schizophrenia and Social

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Structure,

Am.

and Social Class,

J. Psychiat.,

110: 695-701.

Social Class and Psychiatric

Ecllingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Disorders, in Interrelations Between the Social Environment
and

Psychiatric Disorders,

New

York:

Milbank MEmorial Fund,

pp. 195-208.
-3

Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

Therapy.
Zubin,

M.

(1957):

Changes

in

Language During Electroshock

In Psychopathology of Communication (Roch, P. and

J. Eds.),

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

New

York: Grune

&amp;

Stratton.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol., in press.
Levinson, D.J.:
10.

Personal Communication.

Morgan, N.C. and Johnson, N.A. (1957):

Chronic Hospital Patient,

Am.

Failures in Psychiatry:

J. Psychiat.,

The

113: 82h-830.

�-18.
REIFEEENCES

ll.

Opler,

Schizophrenia and Culture, Scientific American,

M.K. (1957):

..

191: 103-110.
12.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, 6.8., Gurvitz,
(1956):

ll}.

Redlich, F.C., Hollingshead, A.B., Roberts,

33.,

Robinson, H.A.,

KJ. (1953): Social Structure

and Psychiatric Disorders,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

ﬂ: 729-73h.

Rennie, T.A.C., Srole, L., Opler, M.K. and Langner, T.S. (1957):
Am.

Titus,

Psychiatric Treatment,

Am.

H.E. and Hollander, E.P. (1957):

Tougas, R.R. (19511):

Urban

J. Psxghia‘b” 3.3;: 831-837.

Robinson, H.A., Redlich, F.C. and Myers, J .K. (195M:

Psychological Research:
17.

Rachlin, L.

Freedman, L.Z. and Meyers,

and
16.

A. and

J. Hillside Hospital, 2: 17-40.

1950,

Life and Mental Health,
15.

Lurie,

Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from

Hillside Hospital in
13.

14.,

Social Structure

J. Orthopsychiat., g5: 307-316.
The

California

F Scale

1950—1955, P331301. Bu11.,

Ethnocentrism as

8.

it:

in
147-64.

Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy,

In Psychotheragy and Personality Change, C.R. Rogers and R.F.
Dymond,

18.

Zierer,

E. and

eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. l96-21h.

Zierer,

E. (1956):

of Creative Activity,

Am.

Structure

and Therapeutic

J. Psychotherapy, i3:

Utilization

11833519.

�-

19

-

APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM

Below are a number of statements.

For each statement

we

want you to

give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree. Answer each

statement according to one of the following:

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY

I

AGREE A

I
I

LITTLE

1.

No

MUCH

MUCH

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a

close friend or relation.
2.

Science has

its place,

but there are

many

important things that

must always be beyond human understanding.
3.

If

people would

talk less

and work more, everybody would be

better off.
h.
think about
5.

ation,

When

it,

6.

the youth needs most is

will to

wOrk and

is best for

strict discipline,

fight for family

Nowadays when so many

much, a person has
an

it

him not

to

but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

What

and the

a person has a problem or worry,

rugged determin-

and country.

different kinds of people

mix

together

so

to protect himself especially carefully against catching

infection or disease

from them.

7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more than
mere imprisonment; such

criminals ought to be publicly whipped, or worse.

�-20..
8.

is to

The

best teacher or boss is the

be done and how

9.

the strong.

go about

to get over

them and

tells

us exactly what

it.

Young people sometimes

up they ought

10.

to

one who

get rebellious ideas, but as they

settle

grow

down.

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak and

�Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatments
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization. Discharge Ratings. and Diagnosis

ROBERT L. KAHN. Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK. Ph.D..
AND

MAX FINK. M.D.
GLEN OAKS. N. Y.

�Reprinted from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry
December 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565—574
Copyright 1959, by American Medical Association

Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment
in a Voluntary Mental Hospital
Duration of Hospitalization, Discharge Ratings, and Diagnosis
ROBERT L. KAHN,

Ph.D.; MAX POLLACK, Ph.D., and MAX FINK, M.D., Glen Oaks, N.Y.

The increasing studies of the sociopsy—
chological aspects of psychiatric treatment
in recent years have primarily been concerned with treatment patterns in the community,12 private practice,29 and outpatient
clinics.24'2” In the studies reported by
Hollingshead, Redlich, and their co—work—
ers ”'27 it was found that social class was
a major determinant of the type of psy—
chiatric treatment in the New Haven com—
munity. Patients from the upper classes
were more frequently treated with psycho—
therapy, while somatic or custodial care was
commoner among the lower classes. They
summarized their results by noting: “It was
found that treatment does not depend on
psychological and medical determinants
alone, but on the status position of the pa27
well.”
tient as
Weinstock,29 reporting the
results of a poll of the American Psycho—
analytic Association, observed that the pa—
tients being treated by their members in
private practice came disproportionately
from the better—educated, high-income pop—
ulation.
Similar ﬁndings have been noted in
studies of outpatient facilities. Myers and
Schaffer 2" showed that the higher a per—
son’s social class the more likely he was to
be accepted for psychotherapy, treated by
more highly trained personnel, and treated
intensively over a long period of time. In
another study Rosenthal and Frank 28
Submitted for publication April 16, 1959.
From the Department of Experimental Psychia—
try, Hillside Hospital.
Aided, in part, by Grants M-927 and MY-2092,
National Institute of Mental Health, National In~
stitutes of Health, US. Public Health Service.

found almost a linear relationship between
educational level and frequency of referral
for psychotherapy.
A more critical test of the importance
of sociopsychologic factors in relation to
psychiatric treatment would be in a setting
where the same therapeutic techniques and
services were equally available to all patients. This requirement is met at Hillside
Hospital, which is a nonproﬁt institution for
the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable symptoms,” 11 who are
admitted regardless of their ability to pay.
One of the main criteria for accepting pa—
tients is their “ability to participate proﬁt—
ably in psychotherapy.” 11
Individual
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is
regarded as the primary method of treatment, with physiodynamic therapies available when needed. The average length of
hospital stay is seven months, although
some patients stay for more than a year.
In a previous study of the Hillside Hos—
pital population,“ it was shown that the
factors of age, education, place of birth,
and degree of stereotypy, as measured by
the California F Scale,1 were related to the
selection of therapy. Those patients who
were older, had less education, were
foreign-born, and had high scores on the F
Scale were more likely to receive convulsive
therapy. In contrast, patients who were
younger, better—educated, and native—born
and obtained low scores on the F Scale re—
ceived psychotherapy as their sole form of
treatment.
The purpose of the present study was to
determine the relation of sociopsychological
27/565

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

factors to (1) the duration of hospitaliza—
tion, (2) the clinical evaluations at time of
discharge, and (3) the ﬁnal diagnosis.

Population

Method
Population—The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside Hospital on March 7, 1957, was
studied. This consisted of 171 patients, 57 male and
114 female, ranging in age from 16 to 68 years,
with a mean of 35 years.
Procedura—The patients were divided according

to the duration of hospitalization, clinical response
to treatment, and diagnosis. The duration was de—
termined by the number of complete months in the
hospital. The clinical response and the diagnosis
were determined by the medical director at a staff
evaluation conference, usually held just prior to the
patient’s discharge. Each patient was rated as
recovered, much improved, improved, or unim—
proved on the basis of the reports of the therapist,
supervising psychiatrist, and milieu staff. The
discharge diagnoses were divided into four major
groups: involutional psychosis, manic—depressive
psychosis, schizophrenia, and psychoneurosis. These
diagnostic categories included all but three patients
in the population.
Each patient was tested with a lO—item modiﬁcation of the California F Scale.20 The F
Scale is a questionnaire which has been related to
such factors as authoritarianism, acquiescence,
ethnocentrism, and rigidity.1 The subject reads 10
statements and indicates to what extent he agrees
or disagrees with each, i.e., “a little,” “pretty
much,” or “very much.” The score for each item
ranges from 1 to 7, and the total score range is
10 to 70. High scores indicate greater agreement
with the statements. These are extreme, uncritical,
or stereotyped expressions. For example, one state—
ment is this: “If people would talk less and work
more, everybody would be better off.”

1.

Results
Length of Hospitalization—In this

population the duration of hospitalization
ranged from 1 to 16 months, With a median
of 7 months. For the purpose of analysis,
the population was divided into three
groups: 49 patients who were hospitalized
for 1 to 5 months; 64, for 6 to 9 months,
and 58 for 10 or more months.
The relation of sociopsychological factors
to the length of hospitalization is shown in
Table l. The group of patients who were
hospitalized for the shortest period had
28/566

1.—Dnration of Hospitalization: Total

TABLE

Months in
Hospital

No.

to 5
to 9
or more

49
04
58

1

6
10

F Score.
Mean
43.9

Age,

Mean
Yr.
45.5
32.5
27.9

40.1

31.0

Education.
Mean
Yr.

ForeignBorn

10.0
11.9
12.8

41%
19%
10%

x’=l5.0 I
Moan

Mean

Diﬁ'i r-

Diﬁ‘eiences

Differences

13.0

§

1.9

T

§

ences

to 1‘s.
l to 5 vs.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
1

0

lo

10
10

9

3.4

Mean

or
12.9

§

17.6

§

2.8

9.5

§

4.6

*

0.9

or

P&lt;0.05.
t P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

the highest mean F scores, were oldest, and
had the least education and the largest per—
centage of foreign—born. Conversely, the
group in the hospital for 10 months or more
had the lowest F scores, were youngest, and
had the most education and the smallest
percentage of foreign births. Patients who
were hospitalized for an intermediate period
fell in beLween these two groups for each
of the factors.
When the data for those patients who re—
ceived convulsive therapy (Table 2) and
those who received psychotherapy (Table
.3) as their only form of treatment were
analyzed separately, similar relationships
between sociopsychological factors and
length of hospitalization were found within
each group.
In the psychotherapy group there was an
increase in mean years of education with
greater months of hospitalization, but the
differences fail of signiﬁcance. It may be
noted, however, that many of the patients
who were in the hospital for 10 months or
more were under 19 years of age and were
thus unable to achieve more than a limited
number of years of schooling.
These same relationships of sociopsychological factors to length of hospitalization
were found when the patients were classiVol. 1,

Dec, 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE

2.—Dnration of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Convnlswe Therapy

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
No. Mean

to 5
6 to 9
10 or more

15

1

to 5 vs.
1 to 5 vs.
more
6 to 9 vs.
more
1

“
T

1
§

17
25

to 9
10 or

6

58.2
45.6
34.9

.

Mean
Yr.
51.7
42.2
32.1

Yr.

Born

6.5
12.3
13.2

67%
24%
16%
x2=12.0 I

Mean
Diﬁer-

ences

ences

ences

12.61

9.5 ‘

5.81

1

of Hospitalization: Patients
Receiving Psychotherapy Only

Education,
Mean
Foreign-

Mean
Diﬁer-

Months in
_

1

6
10

or

§

19.6

§

*

10.1

t

NO-

t0 5
to 9
or more

33
43

6.7

to 5 (is.
to 5 vs.
more
to 9123.
more

1

*

11-4
11.7
12.4

30%
16%
8%

Mean

to 9
10 or
6

1.6
12,4

10

*

Diﬂ‘er-

Differ—

ences

ences

14.1

*

0.3

18.4

*

1.0

or
10.8

Mean

4.3

0.7

.

.
almost
deﬁnlte,
a
hnear, relat1onsh1p be—
tween the ratings of improvement and these
factors. Patients in the recovered group
had the highest F scores, were oldest, least
educated, and showed the highest incidence
of foreign birth. In contrast, patients in
the unimproved group had the lowest F
scores, were younger, better educated, and
were mostly native—born. Because of the
wide variability within each group, however,
only the factor of age reached a level of
statistical signiﬁcance. Education also sig—
niﬁcantly differentiated the groups when
dichotomized according to those who had
less than eight years of education and those
who had eight years or more. Of the re—
covered patients, 29% had less than eight

IS

TABLE

43-2
29.1
24-8

ForeignBorn

P=0.001.

.

ﬁed according to four major diagnostic
groups (Table 4). For each diagnostic
class, the lowest F scores, youngest mean
ages, most years of education, and least
percentages of foreign—born were characteristic of patients hospitalized for the longest
periods. As a group, patients diagnosed
as schizophrenic were the most homoge—
neous in relation to time in the hospital,
showing major differences only in the F
score, without a consistent trend for the
factors of education or place of birth.
2. Results of Treatment—The relation
of sociopsychological factors to evaluation
on discharge is shown in Table 5. There

40-2
38-6
27-8

Differences

0.9

p&lt;omL

Mean
Yr.

Mean

§

P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
P&lt;0.01.

F Score,
Mean

Education,
Mean
Yr.

26

Mean
Diﬂer-

6

10.7

HOSDltal

Age,

x’=5.4

1

23.3
10

Age,

TABLE 3.——Dui*a_tion

_

_

4.—Duration of Hospitalization in Patients Classiﬁed According to Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Months in
Hospital

F Score,
Mean

Mean Yr.

Involutional psychosis ___________________

1-5

58.2
50.9
35.0

58.8
54.5
52.3

9.6
16.0

40.0
46.1
33.1

46.8
39.1
35.5

11.0
11.7
12.3

39%
23%

40.1
36.6
36.1

41.0
27.1
27.1

8.7
12.5
12.5

50%
19%
13%

36.3
38.5
27.6

27.8
27.8
24.1

13.3
12.3
12.9

10%

‘

6—9

10+
Manic-depressive psychosis

..............

1-5
6-9

10+
Psychoneurosis

...........................

1-5
6—9

10+
Schizophrenia

............................

1-5
6—9

10+

Kahn et al.

Age,

Education,
Mean Yr.
7.1

Foreign-Born
57%
43%
0

0

8%
12%

39/ 567

�M
a?

A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

TABLE

Evaluation

...............................
..........................
................................
.............................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved
Unimproved

5.—Discharge Evaluation

No.
17

82
63
9

F Score,
Mean
42.9
39.0
36.1
31.1

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

44.5
35.6
31.2
31.1

10.7
11.2
11.2
13.2

41%
22%
16%
11 %

x 2=6.1

Mean

Differences

Recovered vs. Much Improved
Recovered vs. Improved
Recovered vs. Unimproved

.............................
....................................
.................................
Much Improved 08. Improved
.............................
Much Improved vs. Unimproved
...........................
Improved vs. Unimproved
.................................

3.9
6.8
11.8
2.9
7.9
5.0

Mean
Differences
8.9 *
13.3 I
13.4

4.4
4.5
0.1

*

T

Mean
Diﬂ'erences
0.5
0.5
2.5
0.0
2.0
2.0

' P&lt;0.05.
P&lt;0.02.
t P&lt;0.01.
1‘

years’ education, while all of the unimproved
patients had more than eight years’ educa—
tion; the much improved and improved pa—
tients were in between. By X2—analysis
these results were signiﬁcant at the 5%
level of conﬁdence.
When the data were analyzed for the
patients treated with convulsive therapy, the
trends noted for the population as a whole
were intensiﬁed (Table 6). Analysis of the
patients who received psychotherapy as
their only form of treatment (Table 7),
however, failed to show any statistically
signiﬁcant pattern. The recovered patients
were oldest and had the highest percentage
of foreign births, but education and F score
did not show any clear trend.
TABLE

3. Diagnosis.~—The relation of sociopsy-

chological factors to diagnosis is shown in
Table 8. Those patients classiﬁed as show—
ing involutional reactions had the highest
F scores, the oldest mean age, the least
years of education, and the highest inci—
dence of foreign birth. In contrast, pa—
tients classiﬁed as schizophrenic had the
lowest F scores, the youngest mean age, the
most years of education, and the least num—
ber of foreign—born. Patients classed in
manic—depressive psychosis and psycho—
neurosis categories were in between with
regard to these social factors.

Comment
The present study has demonstrated that

sociopsychological

factors, in addition to

6.—Discharge Evaluation in Patients Receiving Convnlsive Therapy

Evaluation

N 0.

F Score,
Mean

Recovered _______________________________
Much improved __________________________
Improved and unimproved _______________

8
26
23

53.1
41.8
39.7

Mean
Differences

Recovered vs. much improved ______________________________
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved___________________
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved _____________

11.3
13.4 ‘
2.1

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

51.6
43.8
32.3

9.4
10.6
12.3

Mean

Foreign-Born
50%
35%
17%
x *=3.5

Differences

Mean
Diﬁerences

7.8
19.3 I
11.5 t

1.2
2.9
1.7

*

’ P&lt;0.05.

P&lt;0.02.
I P&lt;0.001.
’r

30/568

Vol. 1,

Dec,

1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT
TABLE 7.——Discharge

Evaluation in Patients Receiving Psychotherapy Only
F Score,
Mean

N 0.

Evaluation

...............................
..........................

Recovered
Much improved
Improved and unimproved ...............

54

32-6
38.1

39

33.5

9

Age,

Mean Yr.

Education,
Mean Yr.

Foreign-Born

38.2
32.2
31.9

12.3
12.0
12.2

33%
15%
18%

x '= 1.8
Mean
Differences

..............................
...................
.............

Recovered us. much improved
Recovered vs. improved and unimproved
Much improved vs. improved and unimproved

5.5
0.9
4.6

their previously determined importance in
the selection of treatment, are also signiﬁcantly related to the duration of treatment,
the evaluation of the results of treatment,
and the psychiatric diagnosis. If such results were obtained in a survey of private
practitioners, as in the Weinstock report,29
it could be concluded that the limitation of
the number of practitioners and the expense
of treatment served to select preferred persons from the upper social classes who
could afford the treatment in terms of time
and money. The present results, however,
were obtained in an institution where the
various kinds of'treatment were equally
available to all patients and where the ability
to pay was not a factor in the management
of the patient. We postulate, therefore, that
TABLE

Mean
Differences

Mean

Differences

6.0
6.3
0.3

0.3
0.1
0.2

the observed relationships are not due
merely to mechanically selective aspects,
such as income or the prestige status of the
patient. Social factors are important because they are also related to psychological
processes, such as the habitual patterns of
communication, modes of expression, and
symbolic values. We shall attempt to
evaluate these processes and their effect on
the psychiatric relationships studied in
terms of the inﬂuence of sociopsychological
factors on the attitude and behavior of the
therapist, the patient, and the therapist-patient interaction.
Current data both from this laboratory 14
and from others 12'24’27'28 have demon—
strated that psychotherapy is most likely
to be sustained with those persons who most

8,—Diagnosis

Diagnosis

N 0.

F Score,
Mean

Involutional psychosis ___________________
Manic-Depressive psychosis ______________
Psychoneurosis ___________________________
Schizophrenia ____________________________

24
39
37
68

52.3
40.8
36.9
32.8

Age,

Mean Yr.
56.7
41.9
29.4
26.1

Education,
Mean Yr.
8.9

,

11.5
11.9
12.7

Foreign~Born
46%
26%
22%
10%

x’=14.2 I
Mean

Involutional vs. Manic-depressive psychosis
................
Involutional psychosis vs. psychoneurosis __________________
Involutional as. schizophrenia ______________________________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. psychoneurosis _____________
Manic-depressive psychosis vs. schizophrenia_______________
Psychoneurosis vs. schizophrenia ___________________________

Mean

Mean

Differences

Differences

Differences

11.5 I
15.4 I
19.5 §

14.8
27.3

§

30.6

§

3.9
8.0
4.1

12.5
15.8
3.1

§

2.0 ‘
3.0 I
4.5 §
0.4
1.6
0.8

T

§

§

P&lt;0.05.
T P&lt;0.02.
1 P&lt;0.01.
§ P&lt;0.001.
*

Kahn et al

31/569

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

closely resemble the therapists with regard
to cultural' background, systems of value,
and communication patterns. With stress at
Hillside Hospital on psychoanalytically
oriented psychotherapy, it is consistent that
those patients who are most like the
therapists with regard to these factors would
be kept in the hospital for the longest
period. This was true for patients receiving
convulsive therapy or psychotherapy and
for all diagnostic groups.
The length of time a patient remains in
a psychiatric facility is related to the par—
ticular function and philosophy of the insti—
tution. In studies of outpatient clinics
which have a psychoanalytic orientation 24,28
it has been observed that persons from the
higher social classes, determined by educa—
tion or income, are treated for a longer
period. In contrast, in state mental hospitals, patients with the least education are
kept longer and form a higher proportion
of the chronically hospitalized groupfi'l'ﬁ23
The state—hospital therapist, viewing the in—
stitution primarily as a custodial facility,12
is evidently oriented toward the more rapid
discharge of those patients who come from
a background most like his own.
The observation of the relation between
sociopsychological factors and improvement
rating, particularly in those patients receiving convulsive therapy, may also be related
to differences in communication patterns
between therapist and patient that result in
referral for convulsive therapy. The
therapist may set different criteria for im—
provement for theolder, less educated pa—
tients than he does for the younger, more
sophisticated ones. In the patient with littl/
education and with modes of expression
different from his own, he may regard, for
example, the manifestation of denial or
minimization of symptoms as improvement.15 But in patients culturally like him—
self, the expression of denial is regarded
as a defensive operation, and the patient is
considered unimproved.
Ratings of improvement are also related
to the base line of premorbid functioning.
32/570

.

Thus, the rating of recovered is deﬁned at
Hillside Hospital as “the reasonable ex—
pectation that the patient will be able to
return to his community and function as
well, or better, than he did before he became
ill.” 11 The therapist’s perception of the
patient’s premorbid functioning may be inﬂuenced by the distance between his value
system and that of the patient’s. The greater
the social distance between therapist and
patient the less rigorous the requirements
for behavioral change may be. For ex—
ample, for older, lower—class patients the
ability to resume work may be the major
criterion of improvement. For bettereducated patients work adjustment may be
one of many criteria, including such intangible aspects of behavior as insight, work
gratiﬁcation, and ease of sociability. The
patient’s expectancy not only of the type
of psychiatric treatment but of improvement is also dependent upon social back—

ground.12

While the same trends were shown in the
psychotherapy patients, the results did not
reach the level of statistical signiﬁcance.
This may have been due to the greater
homogeneity of these patients for the
factors studied, in contrast to the convul—
sive group. The outpatient study by
Rosenthal and Frank 28 also failed to ﬁnd a
relation between social factors and improve—
ment rating in the patients who received
psychotherapy. This observation, also,
was obtained in a population that was more
homogeneous after the initial admission
selection process and after the spontaneous
screening effected by the patient’s willing—
ness to attend treatment after he had been
accepted.

The marked relationship between socio—
psychological factors and diagnosis is not
surprising. Certainly, the relationship of
age and diagnosis is an established concept
in clinical psychiatry. In the involutional
disorders and in dementia precox the names
themselves have a chronological connota—
tion. Landis and Page,19 in 1938, stated that
age was the “most important single deter—
Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

.

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

mining factor that we can know about men—
tal disease.” They asserted that, given the
age distribution of a group of patients, they
could accurately predict the number in each
diagnostic group, as well as the probable
outcome with respect to recovery and the
length of hospital residence. More recently,
Frumkin,8 reporting the median ages of ﬁrst
admissions to a mental hospital in Ohio,
observed data similar to our own with re—
gard to the ages for the various diagnostic
groups.
In the .present study, however, we have
also shown that education, place of birth,
and F score signiﬁcantly differentiate the
major diagnostic groups in the hospital. In
View of these ﬁndings, we have postulated
that a psychiatric diagnosis is not just a
one—to—one reﬂection of a speciﬁc type of
behavior pattern but is also a value judgment in terms of social interaction. Thus,
both in our own studies and in the work of
12
it has been noted that patients
others
with similar symptoms will receive different
diagnoses, depending on their social background.
An additional hypothesis relating socio~
psychologic factors to diagnosis may be
based on the concept that persons from dif—
ferent social backgrounds acquire different
habitual modes of adaptation, communica—
tion, and expression. Accordingly, under
conditions of stress, altered brain function,
or states associated with the onset of mental
illness, a person will show those behavior
patterns or symptoms which are similar to
his habitual patterns. Thus, persons from a
lower-class social background are more apt
to communicate in nonverbal, physical
terms, while upper—class people are more
likely to do so in ideational and verbal
modes. Thus, anger may be expressed by
lower—class people by physical violence,
while persons from the upper classes are
more likely to resort to exhortation or argu—
ment.
Opler and Singer,25 studying schizo—
phrenic Irish and Italian patients in a
Veteran’s facility, found signiﬁcant difKahn et al.

ferences in the types of symptoms related
to cultural differences in the family backgrounds. Patients from Irish families in
which the active expression of emotions
were frowned upon and who had dominant,
overprotective mothers, were passive, compliant, and withdrawn, and were fearful of
anything which might separate them from
the protection of the hospital. Patients with
Italian family backgrounds that encouraged
free expression of emotion and who were
ruled by a dominant father, showed as—
saultive and destructive behavior, were difﬁ—
cult to manage, and were rebellious against
authority.
In a comparable study, Miller and Swan22 noted
that hospitalized schizophrenic
son
patients exhibited signiﬁcant social—class
difference in symptomatology. Lower-class
patients showed a predominance of “motoric themes,” while middle—class patients
exhibited “conceptual or r u m i n a t i v e
themes.”
Hollingshead and Redlich12 found a
marked difference in the type of neuroses
shown by persons from different social
classes. While hysterical reactions were
found predominantly at the lowest social
levels, obsessive—compulsive patterns were
characteristic of the upper classes. They
felt thatthe lower—class patient expresses
his neurosis by acting out, whereas the
upper—class neurotic shows his symptoms
in ideational dissatisfaction with himself.
According to our hypothesis, then, we
should expect that persons from lower
social levels would show symptoms that are
nonverbal, and are expressed predominantly
in sensory or motor patterns. Among such
types of symptoms Would be psychomotor
retardation, anorexia, catatonic stupor,
muteness, hysterical blindness, and paral—
ysis. In this connection it is noteworthy
that both hysteria and manic—depressive
psychosis have been reported on the wane
in the general populatio-n.2v4'8'10 This de—
crease, in our view, is related to the general
increase in educational level of the country
as a whole. One cannot, of course, ascribe
33/571

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

the decrease in hysteria to a greater freedom
in sexual matters; hysteria is commonest in
more poorly educated people, who are least
26 has
Rees
inhibited sexually.”6
reported
that those British soldiers who had hysterical symptoms in World War II were mainly
the mental defectives. He noted that
hysterical symptoms were related to intelli—
7
indi—
has
education.
and
Freyhan
gence
cated not only that the present clinical
patterns of hysteria are different from those
shown at the turn of the century but that
such schizophrenic manifestations as “cataleptic stupors, stereotypical motor peculiar—
ities, grandiose excitement, and violent
behavior” are difﬁcult to ﬁnd today. These
observations suggest that a sociopsycho—
logical framework can lead to the prediction
of future patterns of mental illness.
In our investigations of persons with de—
pressive psychoses, we have frequently
noted a pattern of premorbid behavior characterized by lack of imagination, creativity,
and introspective capacity, and by conven—
tionality and general rigidity.13 Similar
patterns have been reported by other
authors.3'5""21 We believe that a deprived
cultural background, such as that involving
little or no education, with the early years
spent in an illiterate environment with
meager cultural resources, is conducive to
the development of such a personality pat—
tern. When mentally disordered, such per—
sons react with the repertoire of behavior
patterns that we term “depression.”
It is important to keep in mind that while
the relationship between social factors and
the psychiatric aspects described is probably
applicable as a general principle, the speciﬁc
ﬁndings may vary in different settings or
institutions. For example, Hollingshead and
Redlich12 found that schizophrenia was a
diagnosis proportionately commoner among
the lower than among the upper classes,
while at Hillside Hospital the schizophrenic
patients had the highest education. This
discrepancy may be related to differences
in composition of the two populations, the
Hillside patients being drawn largely from
34/572

the middle-class groups, with relatively few
from the upper or lower social classes. In
Hillside Hospital the diagnosis of schizo—
phrenia may indicate an “interesting” pa—
tient, while in a state hospital population the
same diagnosis may represent a patient who
is “hopeless.”
From the perspectives developed in this
report, observations which are commonly
explained in motivational and “dynamic”
terms may also be understood in other
ways. Thus, some situations where a pa—
tient is said to be “hostile” or “resisting
psychotherapy” may reﬂect a problem in
communication between patient and ther—
apist, related to their differences in social
background.
It also is apparent that the social back—
ground of the majority of the mentally ill
paients is such as to make the current prac—
tice of universally employing a verbal, in—
sightful-oriented therapeutic approach a
difﬁcult, if not inappropriate, procedure.
The answer to the problem of how to treat
the vast number of mentally ill may be
not to train more and more psychother—
apists, but, rather, to develop therapeutic
techniques more suitable to the patient’s
own systems of value and communication.

Summary and Conclusions
Signiﬁcant relationships were found

be—

tween sociopsychological factors and dura—
tion of hospitalization, discharge evaluation,
and diagnosis in a voluntary mental hos—
pital.
Patients hospitalized for the shortest
period were oldest, had the least education,
were most likely to have been foreign—born,
and had the highest scores on the California
F Scale. Younger, native—born, more edu—
cated, and lower F—score patients were hos—
pitalized the longest.
The same relationship of these factors
to length of hospitalization was found
when analyses were made according to type
of treatment (convulsive therapy or psycho—
therapy) and diagnosis.
Discharge evaluations of improvement
were signiﬁcantly related to age, the older
'

.

Vol. 1, Dec., 1959

�SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

patients having the more favorable ratings.
Analysis of the data by type of treatment
demonstrated that patients rated as recovered or much improved after convulsive
therapy had the highest F scores, the least
education, and were most likely to be
foreign-born.
Diagnoses of schizophrenia or psychoneurosis were associated with lower F
scores, younger ages, more education, and
native birth. The older, less educated,
foreign—born, high-F-score patients were
most frequently classiﬁed under involutional or manic—depressive psychosis.
It is postulated that these relationships
reﬂect the inﬂuence of social background on
psychological processes, such as the habitual
patterns of communication, modes of expression, and symbolic values. These not
only contribute to the pattern of mental ill—
ness but affect all aspects of the patient—
therapist interaction.
Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263d St. (Dr. Fink).

REFERENCES
Adorno, T. W.; Frenkel-Brunswik, E.;
Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.: The
Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper &amp;
Brothers, 1950.
2. Arieti, S.: The Decline of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis: Its Signiﬁcance in the Light of Dynamic and Social Psychiatry, paper read at 113th
Annual Meeting of American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, 1957.
3. Arnot, R.: The Predepressed Personality,
A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat. 76 :617-618,
1.

1956.
4. Chodoff,

P.: A Re-examination of Some

Aspects of Conversion Hysteria, Psychiatry 17:
75—81, 1954.

Cohen, M. B.; Baker, R; Cohen, R. A.;
Fromm—Reichmann, F., and Weigert, E.: An Intensive Study of 12 Cases of Manic—Depressive
Psychosis, Psychiatry 17:103-137, 1954.
S.

H. W., and Meltzer, B. N.:
Predicting Length of Hospitalization of Mental
Patients, Am. J. Sociol. 52:123—131, 1946.
7. Freyhan, F. A.: The Impact of Somatic
Therapies on Course and Clinical Proﬁle of the
Schizophrenias, J. Clin. &amp; Exper. Psychopath. 19:
6.

Dunham,

195-201, 1958.

Frumkin, R. M.: Occupation and Major
Mental Disorders, in Mental Health and Mental
8.

Kahn et al.

Disorder, prepared by a committee of the Society
for Study of Social Problems, edited by A. M.
Rose, New York, W. W. Norton &amp; Company,

Inc., 1955, pp.

136—160.

Hamilton, D. M., and Mann, W. A.: The
Hospital Treatment of Involutional Psychoses, in
Depression, Proceeding 42d Annual Meeting of
American Psychopathological Association, edited
by P. H. Hoch and J. Zubin, New York, Grune
&amp; Stratton, Inc., 1952, pp. 199—209.
10. Harvey, W. A.: Changing Syndrome and
Culture: Recent Studies in Comparative Psychiatry,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat. 2:165—171, 1956.
11. Hillside Hospital: Twenty-Ninth Annual Report, 1956.
12. Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C.:
Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community
Study, New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 1958.
13. Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Personality
Factors in Behavioral Response to Electroshock
Therapy, J. Neuropsychiatry, to be published.
14. Kahn, R. L.; Pollack, M., and Fink, M.:
Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy in a
Voluntary Mental Hospital, J. Hillside Hosp. 6:
9.

216-228, 1957.

Kahn, R. L., and Fink, M.: Changes in
Language During Electroshock Therapy, in
Psychopathology of Communication, Proceedings
of 46th Annual Meeting of American Psychopathological Association, edited by P. H. Hoch and
J. Zubin, New York, Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., 1958.
16. Kinsey, A. C.; Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin,
C. 13.: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1948.
17. Kramer, M.; Goldstein, 11.; Israel, R. H.,
and Johnson, N. A.: A Historical Study of the
Disposition of First Admissions to a State Mental
Hospital, Public Health Monograph No. 32,
Government Printing Ofﬁce, 1955.
18. Kramer, K.; Pollack, E. S., and Redick,
R. W.; Studies of Incidence and Prevalence of
Hospitalized Mental Disorders in the United
States: Current Status and Future Goals, paper
read at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American
Psychopathological Association, New York, 1959.
19. Landis, C., and Page, J. D.: Modern
Society and Mental Disease, New York, Farrar &amp;
Rinehart, Inc., 1938.
20. Gallagher, E. B.; Levinson, D. J., and
Erlich, I.: Some Sociopsychological Characteristics
of Patients and Their Relevance for Psychiatric
Treatment, in The Patient and the Mental Hospital, edited by M. Greenblatt, D. J. Levinson, and
R. H. Williams, Chicago, Free Press, 1957.
21. Malamud, W.; Sands, S. L., and Malamud,
I.: The Involutional Psychoses: A Socio—Psychiatric Study, Psychosom. Med. 3:410—426, 1941.
22. Miller, D. R., and Swanson, G.: Defense
Against Conﬂict and Social Background, paper
15.

35/573

�A. M. A. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY

read as part of a symposium at the meeting of the
American Psychological Association, September,

Disorder, New York, Milbank Memorial Fund,

1953.
23.

A.; Redlich, F. C., and
Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric

Morgan, N. C., and Johnson, N. A.: Failures
in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient. Am.
J. Psychiat. 113 :824-830, 1957.
24. Myers, J. K., and Schaffer, L.: Social
Stratiﬁcation and Psychiatric Practice: A Study
of an Out-Patient Clinic, Am. Sociol. Rev. 19:
307-310, 1954.

25. Opler, M. K., and Singer, J.

L.: Ethnic

in Behavior and Psychopathology,
Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat 2:11-22, 1956.
26. Rees, J. R.: in discussion on paper by
Gruenberg, E. M., in Epidemiology of Mental
Differences

36/574

1950, pp. 51—52.
27. Robinson,

H.

Treatment, Am. J.

Orthopsychiat.

24:307—316,

1954.
28. Rosenthal, D., and

Frank, J. D.: The Fate
of Psychiatric Clinic Outpatients Assigned to
Psychotherapy, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. 127 :330343, 1958.
29. Weinstock, H. 1.:

Report of the Central
Fact—Gathering Committee of the American
Psychoanalytic Association, paper read at the 48th
Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathological Association, New York, 1958.

Prénted and Published in the United States of America

��J. Hillside Hospital, 6:

216-228, 1957.

SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE SELECTION OF
THERAPY IN A VOLUNTARY MENTAL
HOSPITAL1
ROBERT L. KAHN, PH.D.,2 MAX POLLACK, PH.D.,3
and MAX FINK, M.D.4

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between
social class and psychiatric disorder with respect to type and incidence of mental illness (3, 5, 6, l3, l4), selection and maintenance of
treatment (2, 6, 15), and therapeutic outcome (10). The present
study is concerned with social factors in the selection of therapy in

voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich, and their coworkers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of New Haven was divided
into ﬁve social classes on the basis of weighted criteria of education,
occupation and place of residence. Of the residents who were under
psychiatric care, those from the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while organic treatment or
custodial care was more common among the lower classes. Of the
psychotherapies, psychoanalysis was entirely restricted to the two
upper groups. Social class was the predominant determinant of the
type of treatment selected even when the diagnosis was held constant. They summarize their results as follows: ". . . it is found that
treatment does not depend on psychological and medical determinants alone, but on the status position of the patient as well.
Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high
a

1

From the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen

Oaks, N. Y.
Aided by Grant M-927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, U. 8.
Public Health Service.
2Senior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,

Hillside Hospital.
3Scnior Assistant in Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychiatry,
Hillside Hospital.
4 Director, Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital.
‘

216

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

217

‘

degree to the upper social levels. The data of this study would seem
to indicate that most psychotherapy takes place in a setting where
the background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist" (15).
It is possible to relate the results obtained from these community studies to such selective factors as the patient’s ﬁnancial resources or the extent and type of treatment facilities available. A
more critical test of the importance of social factors affecting choice
of treatment would be in a setting where the same therapeutic techniques and services are available to all patients.
This requirement is met at Hillside Hospital. It is a nonproﬁt,

k,

h

.

....-_.._...-.,...v.....

nonsectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with
“early and curable mental symptoms" (4), who are admitted regardless of their ability to pay. One of the main criteria for accepting patients is their “ability to participate proﬁtably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy is regarded as the primary method of treatment with organic therapies
available when needed. The average length of hospital stay is six
months, although some patients remain for as long as a year.
The present investigation is an outgrowth of several years of
study of electroshock therapy. In previous work it has been shown
that certain aspects of personality were signiﬁcantly related to patient selection and therapeutic efﬁcacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
electroshock patients differ from those receiving other forms of
treatment in, regard to cultural background, including such factors
as education and place of birth, and personality as measured by the
California F scale (1); secondly, whether these factors were also
related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.

mum

METHOD

Population: The entire inpatient adult population of Hillside
Hospital as of March 7, 1957 was studied. This constituted a total
of 172 patients, ranging in age from 16 to 68 with a mean of 34.6,
and including 58 men and 114 women.
Procedure: (1) The population was subdivided into three groups,
according to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy,
(b) insulin coma therapy, and (c) psychotherapy only.‘5
5All patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during ’hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data were included
in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

....

“.4.

na.

._‘....-..—._4.,_....—««...

.

gbnyw.

C)

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

218
(2)

birth.

The groups were compared for age, education and place of

(3) All patients were tested6 with a ten-item modiﬁcation of the
California F scale suggested by Levinson (9). The F scale is a questionnaire (see Appendix) which has been related to such factors as
authoritarianism, acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
The patient reads ten statements and indicates whether he agrees
or disagrees with each statement and to what extent. The score given
for each item ranges from one to seven and the total score range is
10 to 70. The greater the agreement the higher the score obtained.
The statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

(4) The population was subdivided in regard to utilization of
certain adjunctive services in the hospital. Among such services
available are group activities, occupational therapy, psychological
testing and creative therapy. The latter is a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a series of controlled painting procedures
which are considered to be analogies of life experience (18). Psychological testing and creative therapy were selected for this study because both require a speciﬁc referral from the therapist.
RESULTS

The data were analyzed as follows: (1) comparison of the treatment groups for age, education, F scale scores, and place of birth;
(2) comparison where diagnosis is held constant; (3) signiﬁcance of
length of hospitalization prior to treatment; and (4) comparison
between groups referred for adjunctive hospital services.
Comparison of Treatment Groups
For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard
deviations for the F scale scores, age and years of schooling are
presented in Table l. The EST group had higher F scores, was
older and had fewer years of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups. These differences were statistically
signiﬁcant for F score and age but failed to reach statistical signiﬁcance for education. The failure of years of education to differentiate the groups was due, in part, to the fact that the electroshock
1.

6As part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F
In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on March 7 their pretreatment scores were used in the statistical comparison
since it had been found that EST signiﬁcantly affects the score during treatment.
scale prior to treatment.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.850

:wmuuom

Eon

$5“

82m
39.7114?

$.32

o

ammokoh

we

219

55

..ﬁ.:namo

cwMuSh

.ummmﬁuom

omen”.—

ﬁamr:

$.85“

$83

:25
.PEaZ

x0
3::
3::

Eom

$.8va

$532

ﬁvawm

55m

mo

.minamo

82m

-ﬁmuuoh

Eon

@EE

$3“

ﬁmmIv

$.32

Agar:

:otugﬁm

985

.me

.3—

$.8va

now

.«o

0

.Ssnamo

.Eeum
988w

ﬂ
”55H.

K

$5; ax?

3?:

Gm

3. ea

mm

532

2: 2:

qﬁ

wzoﬁom

‘8.“

$336

6m

mow—mo?

“2253‘;

a
532

.59

...23

3

2,

N.—

o
o

.
~23»me

«I

m5.—

Gm

q:

3

2;.

n:

gm

3”

a

:32.
.8.”

mi

ed

3

ow&lt;

x0

532

:82

a5

n:

a
a

tantamwﬁcc

Gm

92

”.2

a:

mi.

3»

3m

.

:2.»

tmhd

£5
E2 BE

3::

38mm

532

:82

.En

3:

3

hm

any

.3.

8.

So.

a

an

3

38%?2.85:»; Esscma
.o&amp;u&gt;m&amp;.::=n=—

aozéemﬁ

335-5“

585-98—

-OH—U
smvhmm

$5.19

r7305

.53.:

uh

.382:

.

..

2..

�220

KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

group contained many foreign-born patients whose education was
difﬁcult to evaluate accurately. When treatment groups were subdivided into number of patients above and below eight years of
education, the difference was signiﬁcant at the .01 level. The insulin and psychotherapy groups did not differ statistically for any
of these factors.

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign-born
patients than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group
being highest of all. Among the foreign-born patients, those who
came from Eastern European countries received somatic therapy
predominantly, while the majority of those from Western Europe
received psychotherapy alone.
Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis
The diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable to those reported in previous studies of the hospital popution (12). Of the 172 patients, 78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as
psychotic depression, 32 as psychoneurosis and 2 with other diagnoses. As expected, a larger proportion of the depressed patients
(52%) received electroshock than did those with other diagnoses.
To control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of treatment, the
psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those who received electroshock and those who were given psychotherapy alone.
The results are shown in Table 2.
While the two groups were comparable for age and education,
the electroshock patients had a much higher mean F score, a difference signiﬁcant at the .02 level of conﬁdence. It is also demonstrated
that a signiﬁcantly higher proportion of the electroshock patients
were born in Eastern Europe.

2.

Comparison of Electroshock Patients According to Length of
Hospitalization Prior to Treatment
While the electroshock patients, as a group, have been shown to
differ from those receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there were still
considerable intragroup differences. To account for some of these
differences it was postulated that the same factors involved in selection of treatment were also related to the readiness with which a
given patient was referred for electroshock. While most of the patients who received EST were placed on treatment less than three
months after admission, about 40 per cent were referred after a
period of three to twelve months. In Table 3 the patients are compared according to the period of hospitalization prior to electro3.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

.550

$.23.

ax”:

5.3m

538mm
jigli‘l

EuEEEh

we

“Egan

$53”

«Rana—

.Sauamu

REE

Kc
.0332 50m

§$§

$53“

EOENN

§£Vmw

awash

208
39$me

a;

How

no
con—8.6m

938»
name
Bwamwunﬁ

exam;

15.3.

Gm

3.

3

532

3:

3:

Gm

wﬁ

n2

:32

3:.

9:.

Ga

3:

«.2

h :32

new

q:

wzogum

0:3

N
.vm

38C.
somnuﬁﬁum

we
mama?

:32

.

86

£5

85

utoﬁbﬁ

5.3»

a

mud

ow&lt;
582

a3

and

3:»..qu

kc

.

é.“

38m

:ontﬁwEoU

:32

ea

BE
3m

8.

«liq.

a
$6

.
‘
.

:3

Hammama
.oﬁrmémm

-onuwnm

ha.

,

.

2!!!!)

..

,

‘

W

7

832:

.

,1"

w

322:

,

221

�KAHN—POLLACK—FIN K

222

.,
.550

@va

c

o
sin

uo

.£6

.
33mg

583m uncuzm

$53

m

o

$53

ﬁgs:

a

:

Mano

cum—m
2.25355

-0322 50m

3

@932

3.2%
308

$.83
$5me

:

mm

new

“o
:otuggxwmom

QUE

:oumusvm

wweﬂamo

“26&gt;

w
Aﬁwua

32::

c

3015

kc
m
Ewnud

45

55H.

S

a

85

:2

85

£5

a:

8....

a;

9

:4

:3.”

3»

:82 .En

E...“

2.2

N:

ms:

a

8;

:3.“

5*

3...

Gm

5..

am

3..

38&gt; 582

am

hi

3.;

Gm

3:

mﬁ

2:

532

93

mg

Gm

q:

582

2:.

mo
can:

mEEouuV

Szuzcm

8..

uw&lt;

:3

Sam

\0

.

m3

38m

zowtuiEeU

h
mo

as

3

.88

him
-mNSSEmo:

52:

Susannah.

sum—SA

€3.88...

no:

4 w.

$04

,w

‘

8

e5

$6
kwoa

:2:

o

m

532

c:

m
Gan—u

.85
0.82

c

33

o2

2.2

e

2

»

.22

me.

8.

aa

-608

.88

~22

m
Ema—u

30..—

288

:2:

308

.85.

3

n

285:? 385:”;

52:

o

308

88¢

.

2.
.

�SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

223

Shock. Patients who had higher F scores and were older were treated
earlier than the younger and lower F scale groups. Place of birth is
also a signiﬁcant factor. \Vhile 44 per cent of those treated within
three months were foreign-born, all patients referred after a period
of six months were born in the U. S. The data on education just
fails of signiﬁcance, although 28 per cent of those treated earlier
had less than eight years of education.

.,,.

,,

.

mug-r;

Adjunctive Hospital Services
Comparison of the patients referred for creative therapy and
psychological testing is shown in Table 4. It is clear that those referred for either of these procedures had Signiﬁcantly lower F scores,
were younger in age, had more education and more were nativeborn than patients who were not referred for these services.

4. Use of

DISCUSSION

..

"155'

.

,

The results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of
birth, and F scale score were signiﬁcantly related to the type of
therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive services‘ in this
hospital. Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for those patients who were younger, better educated, native-born and had lower
F scores. Such patients were also referred more frequently for the
auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing and creative therapy. Conversely, those patients who had higher F scale scores, were
older, poorly educated and foreign-born, particularly in Eastern
Europe, were most likely to be referred for EST. These patients
were infrequently referred for psychological tests or for creative
therapy. Furthermore, these relationships were still signiﬁcant when
diagnosis was held constant.
These observations are compatible with those of Hollingshead,
Redlich, and their co-workers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15) who demonstrated that
social factors are related to the type of therapy received in a community. The present study demonstrates that such factors are also
signiﬁcant in a hospital setting where ability to pay is not a criterion
of therapeutic selection and where all forms of therapy are equally
available to the entire population.
With ﬁnancial aspects and the availability of therapeutic facilities eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the
selection of treatment, two alternative interpretations maybe considered. The social factors may relate directly to the empirically
established criteria for choice of therapy. On this basis a patient is

'

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

224

.850

ﬁn“;

$me

Amwutch

35:30

533mm

«@055

A03:

Aﬁmwvmw

H

1%:

35:2

@33

@3:

@8va

§§8

.mwmuamo

«50

853

.25“

«:8

$63

.23

2:5

go

ARE;

50m

aways

$95:

$.38

138%

Z

MFGSK.

805

1%»

3w

.uo

H

~838va
PﬁmSaﬁbﬁ

.Nmenamu

mud“;

«Eu

3?:

$.27:

33“ $.32

Gm

ﬂ.

3

a.»

38&gt; 582

3:

2:

3“ N:

mic—om

kc

v
8.938%

.Um

35?

we

8.“

:82

a

octhd

£5

QN

m5

3

,

uptuzzbuv.

.

.Sx

2:

we

a:

E:

532

SN

3».

5.8

5.3

Gm

2:

”.2

a: 2:

3w

5.3

3»

ASV

32v

Gm

.tnowJ.

....ewm

"A:

S.

vw&lt;
Vutﬁwm

:8:

.

2:».zum

Kc

a5

tooomd

:8.”
~22

3,2

no.

8.

38m

h

582
532

£5
Nﬁu

«.3.

2

:32

so.

a3a

:oﬂuEwEoU

st

333.5

3380
u&gt;tmuu0

332:.

REEF

oz

285:?“

285:»;

..H..U
.._oau&gt;mm

.355
38.“.

Saucmcmmm

.355

Amaze...

oz

uhu

OZ

0z

.

.3

2.

�,amr»:

.

“

‘

..

SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

225

,

..

new...

4..

,wu

referred for electroshock because he is older, poorly educated or
foreign-born, clinical experience having shown that such persons
respond best to this type of treatment. This explanation is inadequate since half the patients with psychotic depression received
psychotherapy alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice for this illness.
An alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to
choice of treatment because they also affect certain psychological
patterns of behavior fundamental to conventional modes of therapy,
such as mode of communication. Thus, a patient is not referred for
electroshock because he is foreign-born or poorly educated, but
rather these factors provide the difference in cultural background
between patient and therapist which makes successful communication less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Robinson et al.
(15), in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that
psychotherapy is most likely to take place where the cultural background of the patient is similar to that of the therapist. Conversely,
patient-therapist differences in systems of value and communication
may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. In the
present study, similarly, the patients who received psychotherapy
alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors

studied.7

.

Apart from the problem of patient-therapist differences, certain
patterns of communication exhibited by the patient may be intrinsically incompatible with the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations have shown that
verbally uncommunicative persons, prone to denial, evasion, stereotypy and use of cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8). Such
language patterns appear to be more frequent in persons with
poorer sociocultural backgrounds.
Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect on communication patterns, may also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler (11) has noted that, among patients diagnosed as
schizophrenic, differences in symptoms are related to differences in
cultural background. Frank et a1. (2), studying psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose symptoms were expressed in
somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those,
who remained had ideational symptoms. In a study of personality
7 The 18 therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and
a mean age of 33.9. Sixteen
per cent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education was over

20.

,
.vr"

�KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

226

factors‘in electroshock patients (8) we have noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and communication were more likely to be
associated with the development of a depressive psychosis. The relationship between communication pattern and symptoms indicates
that symptoms themselves are a mode of communication.
The F scale furnishes a quantiﬁable index of attitude and communication patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a
mental hospital population, Levinson (9) found that high-scorers
were less receptive to entering a psychotherapeutic relationship and
were more likely to receive electroshock. Tougas (17), using an
etlmocentric scale similar to the F scale, found that psychotherapy
was more effective in patients with low scores. In the present study
the F scale was the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment groups.
These results have clinical as well as theoretical signiﬁcance.
Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that lowscorers on the F scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that
those with high F scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone.
Another clinical application may be in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient. This may be done by
minimizing their social differences, by matching them more closely
for age and place of birth. Of possible greater importance is the
necessity for developing new modes of communication when treating
patients who are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic ap1

proaches.

While epidemiological studies have clearly structured some of the
problems involved in selection of treatment,‘and have indicated
the direction of further. study, it still remains for more processoriented research to provide deﬁnitive answers.
SUMMARY

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which all forms of
therapy were equally available, education, age, place of birth, and
score on the California F scale were signiﬁcantly related to the type
of therapy received and to the utilization of adjunctive hospital
1.

servrces.

’

Patients who were older, poorly educated, had higher F scores
and were foreign-born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most
likely to be referred for electroshock. Psychotherapy was the treat2.

�.

.
p

*Wﬂg
g

“A

4““
..

)WA-W.~»‘,.I_~HWW‘W«

"r
.t.

SOCIAL FACTORS IN SELECTING THERAPY

227

ment of choice for those patients who most closely resembled the
therapist in these aspects.
3. These relationships were present even when diagnosis 'was
held constant.
4. Among the electroshock patients the same factors found to be
signiﬁcant in choice of therapy were also related to the readiness
With which a patient was referred for electroshock.
5. It is postulated that treatment selection is the result of the
communicative interaction between patient and therapist. Social
factors may be important in so far as they are related to different
modes of communication.
APPENDIX

“Wadwﬂ

a

F SCALE FORM

.

Below are a number of statements. For each statement we want
you to give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree. Answer each statement according to one of the following:
I AGREE A LITTLE
I AGREE PRETTY MUCH
I AGREE VERY MUCH

3),."

glue»:

‘.

1. No sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a
close friend or relation.
2. Science has its place, but there are many important things
that must always be beyond human understanding.
3. If people would talk less and work more, everybody would be

better off.
4. When a person has a problem or worry, it is best for him not
think
about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.
to
5. What the youth needs most is strict discipline, rugged determination, and the will to work and ﬁght for family and country.
6. Nowadays when so many different kinds of people mix together so much, a person has to protect himself especially carefully
against catching an infection or disease from them.
7. Sex crimes, such as rape and attack on children, deserve more
than mere imprisonment; such criminals ought to be publicly
whipped, or worse.
8. The best teacher or boss is the one who tells us exactly what
is to be done and how to go about it.
9. Young people sometimes get rebellious ideas, but as they grow
up they ought to get over them and settle down.‘
.

\4

I DISAGREE A LITTLE
I DISAGREE PRETTY MUCH
I DISAGREE VERY MUCH

�\‘
KAHN—POLLACK—FINK

228

People can be divided into two distinct classes: the weak
the
and
strong.
10.

REFERENCES
(1)
(2)

(3)
(4)
(5)
(5)

(7)

Adorno, T. W.; Frenkcl-Brunswik, E.; Levinson, D. J. 8c Sanford, R. N.:
The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper 8.: Brothers, 1950.
Frank, J. D.; Gliedman, L. H.; Imber, S. D.; Nash, E. H. 8: Stone, A. R.:
Why Patients Leave Psychotherapy. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. (9' Psychiat., 77:

283-299, 1957.
Freedman, L. Z. 8: Hollingshead, A. B.; Neurosis and Social Class. Am. J.
Psychiat., 113:769-775, 1957.
Hillside Hospital: 29th Annual Report, 1956.
Hollingshead, A. B. 8: Redlich, F. C.; Schizophrenia and Social Structure.
Am. ]. Psychiat., 1102695-701, 1954.
Hollingshead, A. B. Fe Redlich, F. C.: Social Class and Psychiatric Disorders.
In: Interrelations Between the Social Environment and Psychiatric Disorders. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, pp. 195-208, 1954.
Kalm, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Changes in Language During Electroshock Therapy.
In: Psychopathology of Communication, ed. P. Hoch 8: J. Zubin. New York:

Grune 8: Stratton, 1957.
Kahn, R. L. 8: Fink, M.: Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to
Electroshock Therapy. Conf. Neural. (in press).
(9) Levinson, D. J.: Personal Communication.
(10) Morgan, N. C. 8.: Johnson, N. A.: Failures in Psychiatry: The Chronic Hospital Patient. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:824-830, 1957.
(11) Opler, M. R.: Schizophrenia and Culture. Scientiﬁc American, 197:103-110,
-

(8)

1957.

Rachlin, H. L.; Goldman, G. S.; Gurvitz, M.; Lurie, A. 8: Rachlin, L.:
Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from Hillside Hospital in 1950.
This Journal, 5:17-40, 1956.
(13) Rcdlich, F. C.; Hollingshcad, A. B.; Roberts, B. H.; Robinson, H. A.:
Freedman, L. Z. 8c Meyers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Disorders.
Am. ]. Psychiat., [09:729-734, 1953.
(14) Rennie, T. A. C.; Srolc, L.; Opler, M. K. 8: Langner, T. 8.: Urban Life and
Mental Health. Am. J. Psychiat., 113:831-837, 1957.
(15) Robinson, H. A.: Redlich, F. C. 8: Myers, J. K.: Social Structure and Psychiatric Treatment. Am. ]. Orthopsychiat., 24:307-316, 1954.
(15) Titus, H. E. 8c Hollander, E. P.: The California F Scale in Psychological
Research: 1950-1955. Psychol. Bull., 54:47-64, 1957.
(17) Tougas, R. R.: Ethnocentrism as a Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy. In:
Psychotherapy and Personality Change, ed. C. R. Rogers 8: R. F. Dymond.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 196-214, 1954.
(13) Zierer, E. 8: Zierer, E.: Structure and Therapeutic Utilization of Creative
Activity. Am. ]. Psychother., 10:481-519. 1956.
(12)

.

�Social Factors in the Selection of Therapy
in a Voluntary Mantal Hospital

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.
Max

Pollack, Ph.D.

Max Fink, M.D.

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

Aided by Grant M-927 of the National
Health Service.
10-8-57

Institute of mental Health,

U.S. Public

N.Y¢

�Social Factors in the Selection of
Therapy in a Voluntary Mental Hospital

Recent investigations have indicated a relationship between social

class

and

psychiatric disorder with respect to type

illness (3, 5, 6,
and

therapeutic

and incidence of mental

selection and.maintenance of treatment (2, 6, 15),

13, 1h),

outcome (10).

The

present study is concerned with social

factors in the selection of therapy in.a voluntary mental hospital.
In the studies reported by Hollingshead, Redlich and

(3, 5, 6, 13, 15), the population of

classes

on the

of residence.

New Haven was

their co-workers

divided into five social

basis of weighted criteria of education, occupation
Of

the residents

who

were under

and place

psychiatric care, those

from

the upper social classes were more frequently treated with psychotherapy, while
organic treatment or custodial care
Of

was more common among

the psychotherapies, psychoanalysis

groups.

Social class

selected even
as follows:

when
"

was

was

held constant.

They summarize

is found that treatment does not

and medical determinants alone, but on the

well.

entirely restricted to the

two upper

the predominant determinant of the type of treatment

the diagnosis

..... it

was

the lower classes.

their results

depend on psychological

status position of the patient as

Psychotherapeutic methods are applied in disproportionately high degree

to the upper social levels.

The

data of this study would

most psychotherapy takes place in a

setting

seem

to indicate that

where the background of the

patient

is similar to that of the therapist" (15).

It is

possible to relate the results obtained from these

community

studies to such selective factors as the patient's financial resources or the

�extent

and type of treatment

facilities available.

A

more

critical test of the

importance of social factors affecting choice of treatment would be in a setting
where the same

therapeutic techniques

This requirement

is

met

and services are

available to

all patients.

at Hillside HoSpital. It is a non-profit,

sectarian institution for the treatment of voluntary patients with "early
curable mental symptoms" (h),
pay.

of the main

One

who

non—

and

are admitted regardless of their ability to

criteria for accepting patients is their "ability to

participate profitably in psychotherapy." Individual psychoanalytically oriented
psychotherapy

available

is regarded as the primary

when needed.

The average

method of treatment with organic

therapies

length of hospital stay is six months, al-

though some patients remain for as long as a year.
The

present investigation is

of electroshock therapy.

an outgrowth of several years of study

In previous work

it

has been shown

that certain

aspects of personality were significantly related to patient selection and

therapeutic efficacy of electroshock (8).
The purpose

patients differ

of the present study

was

to determine whether electroshock

from those receiving other forms of treatment in regard

cultural background, including_such factors as education
and

personality as measured

by the

California

F

and place of

to

birth,

scale (1); secondly, whether

these factors were also related to referral for adjunctive hospital services.

�Mame:
Population:
as of March 7,

16

entire in-patient adult population of Hillside Hospital

studied.

1957 was

ranging in age from

llh

The

This constituted a

to 68 with a

mean

total of

172

of 3h.6, and including

patients,

58 men and

women.

Procedure:

1) The

population

was

subdivided into three groups according

to type of treatment received, (a) electroshock therapy, (b) insulin

coma

therapy,

and (c) psychotherapy only. *

2) The groups were compared for age, education and place

of birth.
3)

of the California

naire (see

F

All patients

were

tested

scale suggested by Levinson (9).

Appendix) which has been

indicates whether

tent.

The

scale

is a question-

The

patient reads ten statements

he agrees or disagrees with each statement and

to

what ex-

score given for each item ranges from one to seven and the total

score range is

tained.

The F

related to such factors as authoritarianism,

acquiescence, ethnocentrism and rigidity (16).
and

** with a ten-item modification

The

10

to 70.

The

greater the agreement the higher the score

obs

statements themselves are extreme, uncritical or stereotyped

expressions.

patients are seen in psychotherapeutic sessions during hospitalization.
Electroshock and insulin coma are administered as a supplement to this
management. Seven patients received both EST and insulin and their data was
included in both groups. In the results this makes a total of 179 subjects.

* All

part of an ongoing study all the EST patients were tested with the F scale
prior to treatment. In the case of those patients who were actually on EST
on march 7th their pre-treatment scores were used in the statistical comparison since it had been found that EST significantly affects the score during

** As

treatment.

�- h h) The population was subdivided in regard to

of certain adjunctive services in the hospital.

Among

such services available

are group

activities, occupational therapy, psychological testing

therapy.

The

latter is

and

be analogies

life experience (18). Psychological testing and creative therapy

selected for this study because both require a specific referral

therapist.

creative

a diagnostic and therapeutic service consisting of a

series of controlled painting procedures which are considered to
of

utilization

were

from the

�RESULTS:

data

The

was analyzed

as follows:

1) comparison of the treatment

groups for age, education, F scale scores and place of
where diagnosis

is held constant,

prior to treatment,

birth, 2) comparison

significance of length of hospitalization

3)

and h) comparison between groups

referred for adjunctive

hospital services.
I.

Comparison of Treatment Groups:

For each of the three treatment groups the means and standard devia—

tions for the
Table

I.

F

scale scores, age and years of schooling are presented in

The EST group had

higher

F

scores,

was

older and had fewer years

of formal schooling than either the insulin or psychotherapy groups.

differences
reach

were

statistically significant for

statistical significance for education.

cation to differentiate the groups
electroshock group contained

many

was due,

F

These

score and age but failed to

The

failure of years of edu-

in part, to the fact that the

foreign born patients whose education

was

difficult to evaluate accurately.

When

number of

eight years of education, the difference

was

patients

above and below

significant at the .01 level.

not differ

statistically for

The

treatment groups were subdivided into

insulin

any of these

and psychotherapy groups did

factors.

�***

**

ﬁg

*

$3qu

dumumww

33mg.
menwmwowOa

mmwnwOu

macaw

mmeanmcpwn

Humcﬁuamov

Hamcwwuawmwoan

mnmunHnmUd

md

.oow

mumbwwwomsw

309

mwmuwwwomud

ma

ma

.OH

.ow

38

w.w

ma

Hw.o

83..

Emma

wrm

ﬂaw

ES.

Emma

w
macaw

Hm&lt;ww

ooavaHmOd

Hm&lt;mw

Hm&lt;mw

.mm

whw
w.ww**

ﬁrm

a

5:0.

55

mu

ow
.msa

mb

H:.&lt;

9%.

saws

wma

35

5....“

Emma

pmm
wawmumba

P.4m
r.mm**+

d

m.w

92..

EL

mu

Fm

:78

Pmmiiw.»

H.H

w.:m

fmm
m.wo**x

a
xm"

Emma

“Po

Wm

5L

Pm

Emma

8.0m

ammum

aummwﬁmuw

0%

Fe

mu
mm.
mwocvm

:

2%

m

prbw
wow

wwwos

ESE

Ems

.70.?

pom

E.

m

xmmum

w

m

ow

macaw.

on

Hmeé

ma.

8%

Gm§

pmm.
Scam

5

xv."
53$

macomdwou
moumumb

wwmom

moan

Si:
.39.
mm

3

Gwé

8&amp;3

m

5

mﬁow‘ngmamoé

ow
mum

wwwau

wows

xmu

zwdH&lt;m

wwmom

ow
moan.
mcwoww
wowmums

3%

mﬁooé

mwmnm

333
mmma.

Pd:

wuwﬁw

5

o

ow

m
wonmumu

Smﬁ

3%

wean

woumumu

Carma

wwwdw

H

�f 7

'

Both somatic groups had a higher percentage of foreign born patients

than the psychotherapy group, with the electroshock group being highest of
Among

the foreign born patients, those

who came

all.

countries

from Eastern European

received somatic therapy predominantly, while the majority of those from Western
Europe received psychotherapy alone.

II.

Comparison of Treatment Groups in Relation to Diagnosis:
The

diagnostic categories of the patients in this study are comparable

to those reported in previous studies of the heapital population (12).
172
32

patients,

as psychoneurosis and two with other diagnoses.

with other diagnoses.

To

(52%)

As

expected, a larger pro-

received electroshock than did those

control for the factor of diagnosis in choice of

treatment, the psychotic depression patients were subdivided into those
received electroshock and those
shown

who

were given psychotherapy alone.

.02

The

who

results

in Table II.
While the two groups were comparable

shock

the

78 were classed as schizophrenic, 60 as psychotic depression,

portion of the depressed patients

are

Of

patients

for

age and education, the

electro-

had a much higher mean F score, a

difference significant at the

It is also

that a significantly higher

level of confidence.

demonstrated

proportion of the electroshock patients were born in Eastern Europe.

�*

mug
$0.33
mmHImeoUOI

wﬁduogmumg

$5

mHmUManmﬁw

$8

ma

.Om
ooswmuwmom

Hm&lt;mw

9mm

waw.

Emma

5.0

8Q

Emma

w

ow

mnoum

m}?

9mm

a
maﬁa.

5.:

2mmb

ab

5.m

55

Sh

”5.:

mu

mmdwmmdm

Emma

audr

mmm

0.8

0.8

9%

a
cwmw.

ma
wmwaUOdwo

Emma

a

8.0

Hob

9m

fr

Emma
MmmHm

ow
unmammmwos

prﬁm

mu
Waco.

xm
u

:

w

2:3

3&amp;3

HH

:30
waves
«mmum

m

H.mu

mmomu&lt;ma

0%

m

mm

0H

8253

@050.

25%

Uumwmnmua

Beam

vamm

xm
u

mm

pm

Smé

383

wowu

wwmom

#.0w

*

0%

zmaw&lt;m

w

pm

Hammaamsa

mcwovm
mmmdmun

30,3

ow

3me
wwudw

p

H

3&amp;3

GE

oawmw

�- 9 -

III.

Comparison of Electroshock

Patients According to Length of Hospitalization

Prior to Treatment:
While the electroshock
from those

receiving insulin or psychotherapy, there

intra-group differences.

postulated that the

same

To account

While most of the

less than three

months

for

some

have been shown
were

patients

who

received

after admission, about

EST

h0%

was

to differ

considerable

of these differences

patient

which a given

of three to twelve months. In Table

it

was

were also

referred for electro—

were placed on treatment

were

referred after a period

III the patients are

to the period of hospitalization prior to electroshock.
F

still

factors involved in selection of treatment

related to the readiness with
shock.

patients, as a group,

compared according

Patients

who

had higher

scores and were older were treated earlier than the younger and lower

groups.

Place of birth is also a significant factor.

within three months were foreign born,

six

months were born

cance, although

28%

in the

U.S.

The

While hh% of those

all patients referred after
data

education just

on

F

fails

scale

treated

a period of
of

signifi-

of those treated earlier had less than eight years of

edu—

cation.
IV.

Use of Adjunctive

Hospital Services:

Comparison of the

logical testing is

shown

patients referred for creative therapy

in Table

IV.

It is

of these procedures had significantly lower

clear that those referred for either
F

more education and more were native born than

for these services.

and psycho-

scores, were younger in age, had

patients

who were

not referred

�**

*

w
Beam

Bowm

bmmm

ﬁo

m
Em:

«was

dams

mumuwwwomba

m

3

w

Hmmm

308m

m

ma

mw

w

0

gem.

Bow.

Bow.

80m.

o

n

ma

Hm&lt;mw

mHMou
bmmmaw

do

38.

ow

w
$8

38.

awwmdamua

momvwdmwwumawon

32

“Hwy
.OH

5%

arms

wsmu

u
Bow.

3

m

dumb

38.

80m.
mwmbHWHomUd

w

.Om

Hm&lt;mw
ooswmwwmos

m.4m

3.5

95

Emma

UH%H.

ww.m

5.4

SL

Ewan

w
ow
macaw

Ema

H.Mm

H4.w

d

Fm

tro

ww.m

Sam

mme

mu

m.mm**.wm.5

mu}

$.4H

Tme

UMWﬁ.

wo.H

.zmmu

mmwwmbam

bmm

v.5

H.mw

d

Ho.w

Hm.“

53

mu
&gt;ooowawum

wamxwmbu

v.8

H.mw

UHHH.

Kama

Hm.m

ﬂ;

mb

Emma

Mmmwm

ao

mocnmawou

o.wm

PS

0.3

ebwﬁw

om

d

m.o

Pm

“.4

mb

u

Ho
Hammaw

HHH

N

m

H

H

0

m

ow
waves

323

333

m

:.mm

ammwm

manomdwoa

HP

AHOO$V

m

mw

60ch

SR3

momvwdmwwnmawou

m

ow

on

Baum

wHHow

xm

PH

n
AHOO$V

a

Hm

393

3&amp;3

wows

do

zmdw&lt;m

wwmom

m.wm*

Hammdams¢

w

o

383

0

0

pm

ow
mcuowm
mmmdmus

395

wwuwu

m
R§

oawmu

u

�zo
***

**

*

ac

n.e.

zo
593.

wanWOH.u

-

oummdw&lt;m

ammﬂm

wmwauou.
mammaw&lt;m

zo
mwmuwwwnmbﬁ

mHmuwanmbd

owocwm

mumswwwombd

Awmv

o.e.

Sea
gamumww

mw

2.:

m» ma

oosvaumOb
ewmuquawomv

Amqv

.ow .Om

ow
.OOH‘Hmamu

wm&lt;mw

wm&lt;mw

m.w

up.»

uwww.

Emma

:H.:

w:

:w.4

mm.“

Saws

w

wmdeUdm

mooam

Hm.w

a

w.wm*4

arm

Hm.w

po.m

mu
wmwmwuma

m.wm***po.w

cwww.

Emma

w&amp;.4

we;

Wm.m

mm.a

Emma

4.0
bmm

%

m.mm**.w.o

Hw.:

a

5.»

Hm.m

5.»

Ho.a

wow

Ho.p

mu

:.mo**wm.w
&gt;aucundwdo

ﬁuww

smmu

Hp.m

rw.m

Emma

wmmwm

wacnmdwou

H.4w
m.&lt;***

&amp;

m.wm

ow

E

p.»

w.“

Bbmbm

mu
mmH&lt;Hnmm

H&lt;

N»
u

Hm

prwv

m

33

mm

ww

p

mmwot

ow

u
Awmﬁv

Am$v

m

«mmdm

m.mw*
macomduon

r.mm*

mw

d

mm

Am4$v

3.33

Ammﬁv

mm

m

ow

mmRnwowomwoww

0%

Amway
Beam

ammﬁwmm

xm

4H

mp

u

N»

Q:

my
moan
zmdu&lt;m

u
Aqmav

8%

A4H$V

“mpgv

mum
wwmnm

m.wm*

m.mm*

Hm

v

mw

H

ow
mcuowm

owmmaw&lt;m

mmmdmwu

prﬁv

Q:

“MN$V

Amﬁv
wwudw

m

m

m

m

Amﬁv

:3:

Amﬁv

Ammv

akumnm

OdWmH

�-12..
DISCUSSION:

results indicate that the factors of education, age, place of birth

The

and F scale score were

significantly related to the type of therapy received

and

to the utilization of adjunctive services in this hospital.

Psychotherapy was

the treatment of choice for those patients

better educated,

native born and had lower

F

scores.

Such

were younger,

who

patients

were

also referred

more

frequently for the auxiliary hospital services of psychological testing
creative therapy. Conversely, those patients
were

older, poorly educated
likely to

were most

be

and foreign born,

referred for

EST.

who

and

had higher F scale scores,

particularly in Eastern Europe,

These

patients

were

infrequently

referred for psychological tests or for creative therapy. Furthermore, these
relationships

were

still

significant

when

diagnosis

was

held constant.

These observations are compatible with those of Hollingshead, Redlich
and

their

co—workers (3, 5, 6, 13, 15) who demonstrated

related to the type of therapy received in a

community.

The

present study

that such factors are also significant in a hospital setting

demonstrates

ability to

that social factors are

is not a criteria of therapeutic selection

pay

and where

all

where

forms

of therapy are equally available to the entire population.
With

financial aspects

and the

availability of therapeutic facilities

eliminated in accounting for the relation of social factors to the selection
of treatment,

factors

may

of therapy.

two

alternative interpretations

may be

considered.

The

social

relate directly to the empirically established criteria for choice
On

this basis a patient is referred for electroshock because

older, poorly educated or foreign born, clinical experience having

shown

he

that

is

�- 13 such persons respond best to
adequate since

this type of treatment. This explanation is in-

half the patients with psychotic depression received psychotherapy

alone, even though electroshock is generally considered the treatment of choice

for this illness.
An

alternative interpretation is that social factors are related to

choice of treatment because they also affect certain psychological patterns of
behavior fundamental to conventional

cation.

Thus, a

modes

of therapy, such as

mode

of

communi-

patient is not referred for electroshock because he is foreign

born or poorly educated, but

rather, these factors provide the difference in

cultural background between patient

and

therapist

which makes successful communi»

cation less likely in the psychotherapeutic relationship.

Robinson 33

Ei'

(15)

in a study of psychoneurotic patients, have pointed out that psychotherapy is
most

likely to take place

where the

cultural background of the patient is similar

to that of the therapist. Conversely, patient-therapist differences in systems
of value and communication may hamper the establishment of a therapeutic

tionship. In the present study, similarly, the patients

who

rela—

received psycho-

therapy alone were more like the therapists with regard to the factors studied.*
Apart from the problem of

patient-therapist differences, certain patterns

of communication exhibited by the patient may be

intrinsically incompatible with

the establishment of conventional psychotherapeutic relationships, particularly
psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. Thus, our previous observations

haVe

therapists had a mean F score of 21.8 and a mean age of 33.9.
Sixteen percent were born in Eastern Europe. Their mean years of education

* The 18

was over 20.

�-11).shown

that verbally

and use of

uncommunicative persons, prone

to denial, evasion, stereotypy

cliches are likely to receive electroshock (7, 8).

patterns appear to

be more frequent in persons with poorer

Such language

socio-cultural back-

grounds.

Social and cultural factors, in addition to their effect

cation patterns,

that,

has noted

may
among

on communi-

also determine the manifest symptomatology. Opler

(11)

patients diagnosed as schizophrenic, differences in

symptoms

are related to differences in cultural background. Frank 33 a}. (2), studying
psychoneurotic patients, reported that patients whose

symptoms were

expressed

in somatic complaints were likely to leave psychotherapy, while those
mained had
shock

ideational

patients (8)

we

symptoms.

symptoms

likely to

The

indicates that
The F

In a study of personality factors in electro~

hare noted that certain patterns of symbolic value and

communication were more

depressive psychosis.

re~

who

be associated with the development of a

relationship between communication pattern

symptoms themselves

are a

mode

and

of communication.

scale furnishes a quantifiable index of attitude and communication

patterns related to treatment selection. In a study of a mental hospital
lation, Levinson (9) found that high—scorers

were

popuu

less receptive to entering a

psychotherapeutic relationship and were more likely to receive electroshock.
Tougas (17), using an

ethocentric scale similar to the

F

scale, found that

psychotherapy was more effective in patients with low scores.

study the

F

scale

was

In the present

the most consistent factor differentiating the treatment

groups.
These

results have clinical as well as theoretical significance.

�Preliminary observations from a study in progress indicate that low—scorers
the

scale have a poor response to electroshock, and that those with high

F

on
F

scores respond poorly to psychotherapy alone. Another clinical application
may be

in maximizing the communicative interaction between therapist and patient.

This may be done by minimizing

closely for

age and place of

necessity for developing

their social differences, by matching

birth.

new modes

Of

them more

possible greater importance is the

of communication

when

treating patients

who

are refractory to conventional psychotherapeutic approaches.*
While epidemiological

studies have clearly structured

some

of the

problems involved in selection of treatment, and have indicated the direction

of further study,

it still

remains for more process-oriented research to provide

definitive answers.

* See

Esecover's presentation of this topic in this issue.

�_

16 -

SUMMARY:

1.

In a study of social and personality factors affecting selection

of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, in which

all

forms of therapy were

equally available, education, age, place of birth and score
F

on

the California

scale were significantly related to the type of therapy received and to the

utilization of adjunctive hospital services.
2.

who

were

older, poorly educated, had higher

F

scores

foreign born, particularly in Eastern Europe, were most likely to

and were

be

Patients

referred for electroshock.

those patients

who

most

Psychotherapy was the treatment of choice for

closely resembled the therapist in these aspects.
were present even when diagnosis was held

3.

These

relationships

h.

Among

the electroshock patients the

constant.

significant in choice of therapy
which a

patient
S.

was

were

factors found to

be

also related to the readiness with

referred for electroshock.

It is postulated that

treatment selection is the result of the

communicative interaction between patient and
be important

same

therapist. Social factors

may

insofar as they are related to different modes of communication.

�m

17 -

REFERENCES

Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford, R.N.

(1950):
&amp;

The

Authoritarian Personality,

New

York: Harper

Brothers.

Frank, J.D., Gliedman, L.H., Imber, S.D., Nash, E.H. and Stone, A.R.
(1957):

Why

Neurol.

&amp;

Patients

Leave Psychotherapy, A.M.A. Arch.

Psychiat., 11:

283—299.

Neurosis and Social Class,

Freedman, L.Z. and Rollin gsheadﬁﬁ. (1957):
Am.

J. Psychiat.,

Hillside Hospital, 29th

113: 769-775.

Annual Report, 1956.

Schizophrenia and Social

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Structure,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

110: 695-701.

Social Class and Psychiatric

Hollingshead,A.B. and Redlich, F.C. (l95h):

Disorders, in Interrelations Between the Social Environment
and

Psychiatric Disorders,

New

York:

Milbank Memorial Fund,

pp. 195-208.
Kahn, R.L. and Fink,

Therapy.
Zubin,

M.

(1957):

Changes

in

Language During Electroshock

In Psychopathology of Communication (Hoch, P. and

J. Eds.),

Kahn, R.L. and Fink, M.:

New

York: Grune

&amp;

Stratton.

Personality Factors in Behavioral Response to

Electroshock Therapy, Conf. Neurol., in press.
Levinson, D.J.:
10.

Personal Communication.

Morgan, N.C. and Johnson, N.A. (1957):

Chronic Hospital Patient,

Am.

Failures in Psychiatry:
J. Psychiat.,

The

113: Sen-830.

�_

18

_

REFERENCES

11.

Schizophrenia and Culture, Scientific American,

Opler, M.K. (1957):

£91: 103» 110.
12.

Rachlin, H.L., Goldman, G.S., Gurvitz, M., Lurie,
(1956):

J. Hillside Hospital, 2:

1950,

and

Psychiatric Disorders,

Am.

Social Structure

J. Psychiat.,

Am.

J. Psychiat.,

109: 729-73h.

Titus,

Psychiatric Treatment,

Am.

H.E. and Hollander, E.P. (1957):

Urban

113: 831—837.

Robinson, H.A., Redlich, F.C. and Myers, J.K. (l95h):
and

16.

l7—h0.

Rennie, T.A.C., Srole, L., Opler, M.K. and Langner, T.S. (1957):

Life and Mental Health,
15.

L.

Redlich, F.C., Hollingshead, A.B., Roberts, B.H., Robinson, H.A.,
Freedman, L.Z. and Meyers, K.J. (1953):

1h.

Rachlin,

Follow-up Study of 317 Patients Discharged from

Hillside Hospital in
13.

A. and

Social Structure

J. Orthopsychiat., g3: 307-316.
The

California

F Scale

in

Psychological Research: 1950-1955, Psychol. Bull., 53: h7-6h.
17.

Tougas, R.R. (195%):

Ethnocentrism as a Limiting Factor in Verbal Therapy,

In Psychotherapy and Personality Change, 0.3. Rogers and R.F.
Dymond,

16,

Zierer,

E. and

eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. l96-21h.

Zierer,

E. (l956):

of Creative Activity,

Am.

Structure and Therapeutic Utilization

J. Psychotherapy, lg: h81-519.

�-

19 -

APPENDIX

F SCALE FORM

Below are a number of statements.

For each statement

we

give us your personal opinion of whether you agree or disagree.

want you to

Answer each

statement according to one of the following:

I

AGREE A

I
I

I

DISAGREE A LITTLE

AGREE PRETTY MUCH

I

DISAGREE PRETTY

AGREE VERY MUCH

I

DISAGREE VERY

LITTLE

1.

No

MUCH

MUCH

sane, normal, decent person could ever think of hurting a

close friend or relation.
2.

Science has

its place,

but there are

many

important things that

must always be beyond human understanding.

3.

If

people would

talk less

and work more, everybody would be

better off.
h.

think about
5.

ation,

an

it,

a person has a problem or worry,

it

is best for

him not to

but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

What

and the

6.
much, a

When

the youth needs most is

will to

work and

strict discipline,

fight for family

Nowadays when so many

rugged determin-

and country.

different kinds of people

mix

together

so

person has to protect himself especially carefully against catching

infection or disease
7.

from them.

Sex crimes, such as rape and

mere imprisonment; such criminals ought

to

attack
be

on

children, deserve

more than

publicly whipped, or worse.

�”"1
‘

-20..
8.

is to

The

best teacher or boss is the

be done and how

9.

to

go about

10.

the strong.

tells

us exactly what

it.

Young people sometimes

up they ought to get over them and

one who

get rebellious ideas, but as they

settle

grow

down.

People can be divided into two

distinct classes: the

weak and

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="2">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2">
                <text>Published Works</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2524">
              <text>Social factors in selection of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital. J Hillside Hosp., 6: 216-228, 1957.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2525">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2526">
              <text>mfp-02-01-001-25-030</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2527">
              <text>1957</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2528">
              <text>Kahn, Robert L.; Pollack, Max; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2529">
              <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="46">
          <name>Relation</name>
          <description>A related resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2530">
              <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2531">
              <text>4 items. 1: [Preprint]. 2: Reprint from the A. M. A. Archives of General Psychiatry December 1959, Vol. I, pp. 565—574; title: Sociopsychologic Aspects of Psychiatric Treatment in a Voluntary Mental Hospital. 3: Xerox of J. Hillside Hospital publication. 4: Another [preprint]. </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2532">
              <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2533">
              <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="74455">
              <text>en-US</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="81016">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="87577">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="37">
          <name>Contributor</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="94138">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="5">
      <name>Published</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
