<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="252" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/items/show/252?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-07T22:57:22+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="43">
      <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/31ade8ace56aaea325e0c1b5774137fb.pdf</src>
      <authentication>34c1dccec8167a1f1d6a23f225341ecc</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="100669">
                  <text>F

,

Perception of

Eknbedded

Figures after Induced

Cerebral Trauma

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D. and

Max

Fink,

M.D.

1/?

"a

From

the Department of Experimental Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks,

M—927 of the National Institute of Mental Health, National
Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service.

Aided by grant

Presented
11—27-57

at

American Psychological Association, New York, August, 1957.

NJ.

�Perception of

Embedded

Figures after Induced

Cerebral.Trauma

Studies of complex visual perception
man

are not always clear or consistent.

after cerebral
The

damage

in

disagreements may be due,

in part, to difficulties in evaluating the extent of the disease process
or the degree of alteration in cerebral function. In contrast, conditions
in'Which there is control of the degree of brain damage, as in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), provide a unique opportunity

for studying this

problem.
While investigations of brain-injured populations have focused an

the role of location of lesion on behavior, current studies of
emphasized the
been shown

to

EDT.

have

factor of individual differences. marked.variability has

for perceptual (l), behavioral (2)

and physiological reSPonses

In addition, various personality (h) and social factors (5) have

1.

C. Landis, D. Dillon and S. Leopold, Changes

2.

M.

3.

R.L. Kahn,

'

ECT

in flicker-fusion

threShold are in choice reaction time induced by electroconvulsive
therapy, J. Psychol., bl, 1956, 61-80.

Fink, R.L. Kahn and M. A. Green, Experimental studies of the
Electroshock process, J. Nerv. &amp; Ment. Dis. (in press).
M. Fink and E.A. weinstein, Relation of amobarbital test
to clinical improvement in electroshock, A.M.A. Arab. Neurol. &amp;

PWChiato, 76’ 1956, 23-29;

Fink and R.L. Kahn, Relation of

EEG delta activity to behavioral
in
electroshock; quantitative serial studies, A.M.A. Arch.
response

M.

Neurol.

&amp;

Psychiat. 78, 1957, 516-525.

h.

R. L. Kahn and M. Fink, Personality

5.

R. L. Kahn, M. Pollack ahd

factors in behavioral response

to Electroshock, Conf. Neural. in press).

F. Fink, Social factors in.the selection
of therapy in a voluntary mental hospital, J. Hillside Hosp., 6,

1957, 216-228.

�-2been related to differences

In the course of

an

in reSponse to treatment.

investigation of the perceptual

and behavioral

changes with ECT, a convulsive-subconvulsive control study was undertaken.

In this report, performance

on complex

visual tasks is presented.

Specific-

ally, the aim.was to determine whether perceptual change induced by ECT
is related to the degree of altered brain function and clinical behavioral
change; and whether the pretreatment perceptual pattern was related to

physiologic changes with treatment.
The method used

in the study

was the perception of embedded geometric

figures - a technique which has been Widely
studies of perceptual changes

accompanying

in recent years in
cerebral dysfunction (6).
employed

Lethe:
1) Population:
were
22

Fifty-three consecutive patients referred for

studied. These included

16 men and 37 women, with ages ranging_fran

to 66 with a median of h9 years.

into

ECT

The

patients

two groups. An experimental group of 29

were divided

at

patients (Convulsive

random
A)

received grand.mal electrotherapy with pentothal premedication three times
a week, using
C—h?

either a Medcraft alternating current instrument or a Reiter

electrostimulator.

A

minimum of 12

treatments were given.

of treatments was determined by the supervising

The number

psychiatrist in charge of

clinical criteria. A control group of
treated in similar faShion, except that only subconvulsive

the treatment unit on the basis of
2h

6.

patients

was

5. Battersby, H.P. Krieger, M. Pollack and M. B. Bender, Figure
ground discrimination and the "abstract attitude" in patients with
cerebral neoplasms, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 76, 1956, 369-379;
H. L. Teuber and S. Weinstein, Ability to discover hidden figures
after cerebral lesions, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. &amp; Psychiat., 763 1956,
369-379; F. Pollack, W.S. Battereby and M. B. Bender, Figure-ground
discrimination in patients with cerebral tumor, presented at Eastern
Psychological Association, 1957.

W.

�"1

-3stimulation was given following the pentothal. Fourteen patients in the
control group

were subsequently given a

regular course of convulsive

therapy (Convulsive B).
2)

Perceptual task: In the week prior to treatment and on the

day following the 12th treatment each

patient was tested with a modifica-

tion of Gottschaldt's hidden figures developed
The

by Battersby

subject is presented with a page containing

geometric

figure,

figure is

embedded

it

and below

(fig. 1).

-a

simple

a complex figure in which the simple
The

patient is asked to trace a Specific
by

geometric figure from the background/outlining
~The

two fonns

gt 2;.(7).

it with a

colored pencil.

discriminations ranged in complexity from relatively simple to more

complex. There were 25 such discriminations.
was allowed

for each. Performance

of errors.

To minimize a

was

A

maximum of two minutes

scored in terms of total number

practice effect

two

equivalent forms of the test

were used.
3)

Evaluation of physiologic change:

Two

the electroencephalogram and the amobarbital

tests of brain function -

test

(8)

-

were given to

at weekly intervals during treatment.

each

patient prior to,

7.

Battersby, Krieger, Pollack and Bender, op.

8.

E. A. weinstein, R.L. Kahn, L.A. Sugarman and L. Linn, Diagnostic
use of amobarbital sodium ("amytal sodium") in organic brain
disease, Am. J. Peychiat., 112, 1953, 889-89h.

and

cit.,

The

703-712.

�.uelectroencephalogram was evaluated as to the degree of delta activity
induced according

to criteria previously published (9)°

’The

amobarbital

test for brain disease was noted as positive or negative according to the
standardized criteria (10). The results of these tests obtained during
the second, third and fourth weeks of treaunent furnished the criteria
for physiological change.

A

combined physiological index was obtained

by ascribing to each high degree delta

barbital test a score of one.
ranged from zero to six.
h)

EEG

record and each positive amo-

The range of

Behavior ratings: Each

physiological alteration thus

patient's behavior

was

evaluated

at

weekly

intervals. After the 12th treatment, a rating for the degree of behavioral
change was made according to

»..none.

These

ratings of

four classes: marked, moderate,

change were

minimal or

not value judgments as to the quality

of change, but rather quantitative estimates of differences in behavior

patterns under similar conditions of observation.
vpatterns as euphoria, paranoia or withdrawal might

[Thus such behavior

all

be

rated as equivalent

degrees of quantitative change, although the implications of each for qual-

itative evaluation of

9.
10.

improvement were

Fink and Kahn, op.

cit.,

quite different.

éin~pressl. 37$-5§ﬁn.

'Weinstein, Kahn, Sugarman and Linn, op.

cit.,

889-89h.

�Results:
pre-treatment and treatment scores

The

number of

errors with treatment is

intragroup analysis

shows

shown

and the mean change

for

each group

that the subconvulsive group

in the

in Table I.

made

The

significantly

fewer errors during treatment, while the combined convulsive patients made

significantly more.
TABLE

I

Intragroup Comparisons for

Number

Before and During

ECT

Mean No.

Type of Treatment

Subconvulsive
Convulsive

A

Convulsive

B

Before

E}

ECT

of Errors

Errors
During

EDT

Difference p_*

2h

9.96

7.67

-2.29

4:1.02

29

10.59

12.62

+2.03

NS

7.36

10.1h

+2.79

‘=1.05

+2.28

“=1.02

**

1h

Combined Convulsive

h3

‘

* Intragroup analyses in this and subsequent tables based on
Wilcoxon's method of paired replicates.
** Patients originally in control group, then placed on convulsive

treatment.

group

is

period.

The score obtained during treatment

used here as the pretreatment score

Prior to treatment. subcgnvulsive patients

made

in the control

for the convulsive
approximately the

same

number of

errors as the original convulsive group. During treatment, however, subconvulsive subjects made fewer errors (7.67), while the errors in
convulsive patients increased to 12.62 errors - a difference significant

at better than the

1%

level of confidence.

�-6When

the data is analyzed with respeCt to physiologic change, significant

increases in errors are found only in those patients with the greater
degrees of physiologic change. This relationship is present in analysis
of the amobarbital

tests are

test

and the

combined (Table

EEG

as separate indices, and when the two

II).
TABLE

II

Intragroup Comparisons for Number of Errors Before and After
ECT in Relation to Degree of Physiological Change
.

Physiological Index

N

Mean Difference in Number of
Errors during Treatment

Amobarbital Test.

or

None

positive

one

13

-O.23

NS

28

+3.714

.01

23

+1.73

NS

18

+3.33

.05

3

21

+1.00

h to 6

us

20

+3.90

.01

Two

or three

positive

Electroencephalogram

or

None

one

High Delta
Two

or three

High Delta

.

.

Combined Physiological
0

to
The

in

relationship between

number of

ﬂue degree

errors during treatment is

of behavioral change
shown

with no, minimal or moderate behavior changes

difference in
made

number of

errors.

in Table

III.

do not show an

and the change

Those

patients

appreciable

Those with marked behavior changes, however,

significantly more errors during treatment.

�TABLE

III

Intragroup Comparisons for Number of Errors Before and During
ECT in Relation to Degree of Behavioral Change
Degree of Behavioral Change

Difference Nnmber
Errors During Treatment

Mean

N

_
marked

2h

Moderate

1h

p

&lt;1.0l

+3.58

+1.00

NS

-0.h0

NS

l

Minimal

or

5

None

Analysis of the pretreatment error scores in relation to the degree
of physiological change

is

shown

in Table

IV.

The

results

show

that subjects

with large pretreatment error scores manifest greater degrees of physiolog-

ical

change during treatment.

Patients with

little physiological

change

during convulsive therapy had a mean pretreatment score of 7.88, while

physiological effects,

had a mean pretreatment

score of 13.25 errors. The triserial correlation
the .05 level of confidence.

is +.3h, significant at

those

who developed marked

TABLE

IV

Relation of Pretreatment errors to Eventual Degree of Physiological
Change During Treatment
N

Mean Number

Errors Prestreatment

Physiologic Change:
o

to

211’

3/ and

my

16

7.88

19

11.21

�Qualitative Data:
Alterations in size of figure or in

minor aspects of form were common

types of error during both testing periods. Certain qualitative patterns
were

frequently noted during treatment,

however, which occurred only

or to a lesser extent in the pretreatment period.

patients to
.was

make no

It

was common

attempt to trace the more complex figures.

rarely

for
This response

often associated with a generalized withdrawal reaction in which the

patient

was unreSponsive to any stimulus or procedure.

Others became

hostile and negativistic toward the testing.

l

i

Patients

wiﬂn

the greatest

amount of physiological change seemed to

difficulty following instructions. They would trace the lines indiscriminately without regard for the Specific figure to be outlined, repeated

have
‘

a previous figure despite changes in the

actually existed,
the

more complex

and impulsively, and showed

Such

little

drew

lines

where none

trace the stimulus figure while ignoring

and attempted to

test figure.

test figure,

patients were likely to respond quickly

concern about making an error even

they might spontaneously comment, "I

know

that's

not

right."

when
‘

�Discussion:

results of this study clearly danonstrate a relationship between
the degree of cerebral dysfunction and perceptual alteration. Patients
‘The

with subconvulsive stimulation

make fewer

errors

on

retesting.

A

slight

decrease or no change in errors occurred in those patients receiving
vulsive therapy

who showed

only minimal physiological changes.

vulsive patients, however, with the
showed a

significant increase in

alteration,
of errors. This interrelation-

number

is in

accord with studies of patients

with altered brain function due to head injury and brain tumor.

(ll),

The con-

most marked physiological

ship of brain fUnction and perception
and Weinstein

con—

Teuber

applying a similar technique in cases with penetrating

’brain,wounds, concluded that performance was unrelated to locus of lesion
but that aphasic patients

made

significantly more errors than a non-

aphasic brain-injured group.

Pollack gt §l3(12), using the identical

in this study, reported

relationship between perceptual errors

as

no

test
and

the location of lesion in tumor patients. They reported, instead, that

defective perception

related to the severity of other rental changes,

was

‘

such as

It

disorientation.
Should'be pointed out that the

all patients referred for
to that found by Pollack

ECT

was 10.35

total pretreatment

cit.,

Teuber and Weinstein, op.

12.

Pbllack, Battersby and Bender, op.

13.

Ibid.

score for

errors, a score almost identical

gt §l5(13) in theﬁ‘brain

11.

mean

369-379.

cit.

tumor

patients. Since

�the two populations are comparable in terms of other parameters as age
The

and education.

defects in figure ground discrimination cannot

be

’regarded as reflective of cerebral dysfunction as an isolated entity

abstracted from the totality of behavior. Rather than being in a
to one relationship, poor performance on such tasks

interaction of

many

there are

cases with cerebral

many

may

be due

to the

factors, brain dysfunction; being only one.
not

damage who do

show

one

Thus

defects.

Con-

versely, the present findings indicate that the inability to perceive
embedded

as

it is
The

figures

may be

related as

much

to certain types of mental illness

to brain disease.

!

relationship of perceptual alteration to behavioral

is clearly demonstrated.

treatment

The

patients

increase in errors during treatment were those
pronounced change

in clinical behavior.

who showed

also

who

change during

the greatest

showed

the most

They manifested such behavior

patterns as euphoria, hypomania, withdrawal, somatization or paranoia.
Comparable to these are the
embedded

figures test during treatment.

related to
paranoid
was

qualitative aspects of performance

an evasion

The

some

may

as well be

was

cases, and to a

lack of concern in correcting errors

associated with clinical patterns of euphoria

increase in errors

the

Failure to attempt the task

or withdrawal reaction in

hostility in orders.

on

attributed to

and hypomania.

change

The

in motivation or

attitude toward the task or examiner as it is to any Specific aSpect of
the altered brain function. Changes in performance on this complex perceptual task can thus be understood as

one

manifestation of changes in

the patterns of interaction with the environment.
The

relation between behavioral

this type of task, has been noted

and perceptual

by Witkin to be

patterns, using

true of persons without

9

�-11..

demonstrable cerebral dysfunction as well.

He

individual differences in the perception of

embedded

be

related to personality factors (15).

The

found

that the

wide

figures (1h)

may

finding in the present

study of the prognostic significance of the pretreatment score to the

eventual physiological reaponse is in accord with his observations.
7

Personality factors

may

thus be related to the degree of changes in
In a previous study (16) certain person-

brain function.with trauma.

ality patterns

were associated with the

ment following ECT.

short term behavioral improve-

basic characteristics of persons with a
favorable prognosis defined in that study were an inability to think

critically

The

or sensitively about

their

own

or other's needs or feelings,

patterns characterized by oversimplified generalizations,
,stereotypy and conventionality. The present data that persons with
greater difficulty in making the necessary analysis and figure-ground
and response

discriminations

on embedded

figures

show a

greater alteration in behavior

with treatment, is consistent with the previous observations.

Witkin,.Individual differences in case of perception of
figures, J. Pers., 19: 1950, 1-15.
15. H. A. Witkin, Nature and importance of individual differences
in perception, J. Pers., 18, l9h9, 1&amp;5-170.
1h.

16.

H. A.

embedded

Kahn and Fink, op.

cit.

�.12Summary and Conclusion:

1. Fifty-three consecutive patients referred for electrotherapy
were studied before and
embedded geometric

after treatment

figures.

An

on

their ability to perceive

experimental group of

29

patients

received

A.
regular grand mal therapy wiﬂa pentothal premedication.
control group of 2h patients received subconvulsive stimulation only.

2.

The

experimental group

made

significantly more errors following

treatment than did the controls.
I

3. 'Within the experimental group, however, there was considerable
I

variability. Increase in errors

was found

to

be

significantly related

to the degree of altered brain function, and the degree of behavioral
change.

h.

The

pretreatment error scores were significantly related to the

degree of altered brain function developed during treatment. The significance

in terms of personality factors is indicated.
5. Performance in this complex visual task mirrors the pattern of

of this

behavioral change observed clinically.
6.
one

It is

concluded

that performance

on a complex

visual task is

manifestation of a generalized pattern of interaction with the environ-

ment.

,4
Lu...

�.13-

Legend

Illustrations of test figures.

Fig. 1.

used to acquaint the subjects with the task
the task

is

The

is

preliminary sample
shown

in a. In

d

complicated by having the subject determine which of

the two simple figures can be found in the complex figure.

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="2">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2">
                <text>Published Works</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2514">
              <text>Perception of embedded figures after induced altered brain function. American Psychologist, 12: 36, 1957.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2515">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2516">
              <text>mfp-02-01-001-24-029</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2517">
              <text>1957</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2518">
              <text>Kahn, Robert L.; &lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2519">
              <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="46">
          <name>Relation</name>
          <description>A related resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2520">
              <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2521">
              <text>[preprint].</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2522">
              <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2523">
              <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="74454">
              <text>en-US</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="81015">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="87576">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="37">
          <name>Contributor</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="94137">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="5">
      <name>Published</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
