<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="248" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/items/show/248?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-07T17:27:46+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="39">
      <src>http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/83ab48a2c2deaa99207d2c9a9f5a4a5d.pdf</src>
      <authentication>5d4afa38e2ad19bfcb3084fe8746be25</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="100665">
                  <text>111: 9/55

Egbert I» Kuhn, mm.

Hillside Raspiul, Glen
Despite ”posted attomptn,

wmlatiam

am, my Ia‘rk

between

aim

we activity

dwed by «hammock and subsequent. therapeutic outcome haw ham

Email, mrtain
ahock therapy

indum alterations in the sleetmncophalogm in all subjects.

mamas

voltage whim

wmmuml.

conclusions are wan-entree! Iran previous studies (1).- Electra:-

Three pattema we generally dowribad: ‘1) slowing of tha

2) the

in-

may

of

mam, symtria

awn {remiss}

51w wave activity, generality a: high

appear as burnt nativity) and 3) didnu‘him

cios in rate and amplitude.

mm in

din-act.

a

at beta rm;—

relatim human

12m

degree or

Mg”, and the number and imam a! mama. In my subjoéts
”mum paint at change is daaeribod, which can be maintained by further

those
a.

tmamnt, but which is

apparently not increased. Such indueod oloatroenccpmlu

ographic ehangaa are ﬂux-aims.

to the pretreatment

lswls is

number, frequency and
Another area

than

type

m ate at“ return at the: cem’bml

generally 1 to h weeks, dcpending

mhﬁmﬁhip between dagraa of manifest

and authors is

the

the ha}: of direct

wry loss and aonfusim and the

degree of electroencephalogmphie

abmmlity.

wry changes with few tmamants

and without.

Cases are demribed of

3mm

significant olaetmncaphalogmphic

mm without manifest clinical

ﬂange; and also a: never: changes in cerebral
emmnicn cf
inpaimsnt. In these reports,
ganic

dimam an

at tmtnen‘b.

a! agreement ”mg the

wry

patterns

it is?

stated that

Wim also correlates poorly with clinical results.

Hammad at tbs Eastern me Society, Bethesda, September 30,

1955»

mach

or»

��Whﬁla

and

EEG

these

twa

“mommy,

atuéies dananatrute a ralatianship betwaen clininal ralult
tho majority

91’

reports

fail to

do

m. It

3.8

mt 11h]:

that this diucrupanay is tha mosult a: diifarunt populatiana, but rather; tun
dimer-macs in methods of evaluating Swami, than him at Matias; and
diffexunaea in ontinnting change: in aarubrul runntian.

In in» ﬁgurae at stuﬁias a! alﬁarnd twain tunetian indueed by

at

elsatma—

in SW Yak, further data m the mkﬁiamhip
betaaun EEG ahangea aaa clinical atfoeta of aluetrenhoek wars colleetcd. ’lhs
genaral reaulta a: pruviaun investigatiena an the alteratienn in tho EEG with
shank

this 311137149 Hospital

taro anniixnnd, but 313a, a ﬁatinite rmlatianahip betwaan.ﬁﬂﬁ
effects and has clinical rasult was dnmnnstratod. Throa £661 are preaanted

alaetmeshock

today:
(1) the

m pattem mum electroshock

and

their

“hum to in-

pwavument.

(2) The internorrelatianl at airfarant quantitieatians

at ddlta acttvity.
(3) m relation of these abaemtiam to a theary at abet
whim.
:'vzvﬁhgggggga§§§y
Ihuntvmfaar aanaegutava patianta ratarrea for aleetre—
3

shock wart studied. Electruanczgu:.m¢~q

us

'

5

warn nan:

priar ta traatmant, at uaokly intsrvala ﬂaring traatment aha grist treatment.
In 8 ehanns1_ﬂhdcra£t instrunsnt, uaodlo eloatrudus, and bipolar racording
Hypervnntilaxdan was tha anly

was unad.

activatian tachnic utilixoé.

truatnant, raaarda ware takna tbs day'attor; ganamully

25

to

31 hunts

Datum:

after

traatmnnt.
Th3

Baiter
and

the

tmmnta wen administered by the staff paychia‘bris’m,

6 h?

electrnatinulator. Treatment scheéulas

namber

of treatmants variad tram

impruvemant, the

9

to 33.

warm

An

thrae

wing

a.

timma a'waek;

patianta shaved alinical

psychiatrist tended ta give raver treatments,

and warn widely

��m5:-

are mam of the diffieultiea in evaluating impmvmnm More might
have «momma in the estimates of change in those patients. In any
me, by
E‘o

wing this threefold clusifieatiem, the diffemooa between the
groups will be

distinct.

9E gag

EVALUATIOX

first and third

W!

A

total. of

160

meow: were obtained in these who

Following the suggestion of Strauss

(h), the
delta mm am determined for three: lead mmbinetiam (frontal—swam,
anterior temporal - vertex, and
lobe) for 180 ascends of Hoarding
for not load. The delta index :13
on the pemont time woupiod by
aerate.

”ﬂame
mm

of '3 ops- or slower. Tho avenge delta-dude: for the thm loads,.’md the
highest delta may: in my load were the 1mm: and in the final tabulation.
waves

Sinateneouoly, the record me

mad for the almost frequency 1am»

tifiea at least twioe in my load; the highs» voltage of

any

delta may and

the duration of the longest beret.
cm

the basis of those

were placed
160

mores

in

It rank

ﬁn indie”

order from the

of slow wave activity the meordu

ngt

abnormality to the

lawn.

The

were then divided into 3 groups! a Met. upper thins? high degree

abnormlﬂy, and

lmat

m

were .. 1m demo mbmmlitm
mum-*3: 1. 0m- nouns show a Mitim aomlntion human early out dugm
m; okxomlity and improvement. Thane relationships are demonstrated
11:

Slide 1.
By

utilising

sleetroehock, we
of

troutmt is

quantification of slow wave abnormality induced by
conclude that snob EEG abnormality induced in the first 3
theme

on “mental

response.
2..

clinical

mm minimums

We,

and than

m
clinical

Mama for the short tom favorable
mot bathroom

met

each of the

eeeh other?

indie”, first with the
‘

��WWW £611.3ng ehetrashock
mum

is

the mault of the

emﬁm in

the

mtiant

functim in winch new panama of adaptaum, part».
Mae me “when amnamu
1mm thaw 6! dental, my be.
of a

inﬂame! brain

as?

WM.

that: an. alts-rad milieu of eon-ohm}.

a puma-equate for
~

30W,

:1:

mmnt.

mum as measured by delta abnormality is

Ta @115

extent the

first

part.

at the Mates».-

”WWI:

many of quantitative
far the duaidatian at ”Wm 51‘ 27mm
mans studies paint. to the

Em

5mm:

�mm.

1..

than

39mm Lu Th0 Eleatmmeplulm in
Thempim, J. Raw. 8: Kent. 131»... Egg 95.107, 3.9512.

Jemph a. and Panelist,

maetrie

311w]:

3., Harland, W... Kaufman, and Pincus, 6.: Changes in the 81qumaﬁmlegm and in the ke-mtion at 17 {shoutemida [teeming Enam-

3.

shmk mommy af Agitated Mpmvam, Payuhoaom. Had... Qt

mm, mm: own in the me Mr Barbiturau Anesthesia mma by
Elw£mcanwlsin Mama’s and mm SiWicanee for the Timmy (31‘ E01

3..

m and Olin. Rummy“, g; 26l—280, 1951.

mum,

h. 8km“; Km: Clinical
-

at mm.

madmaophalogmphie Studies a eomhtim
Elwtmmawralegmphie and Anatomic Ganges in Gases with

m: 14260, 191th.
Hammin, Eel” and him, Rd": Mastic U“ a! Mbaﬁihl 3mm!
(“Mm Sodium“) in Ma Brain 31m”, Am. J. Wat" m: 12,
m,

6. Fink,

3.,

Am.

J. Psychnti,

'

1953.

m,Rental

Bead», ﬂu

H; and

a! Qrmie
7.

and

Dimse,

Org-mm Brain

5.

Wﬁ; 19%.

as n Diagnostia Sign

Baum, at 246—58, 1952‘

W

in now-y and
Mauser, 3.: 33mm a:
Impmmment in Wmhoak, cant. "euraloguu, 1‘? W6,

mm, m, Fink,
Lamina to

Byndram,

ﬁne Farm-Hand East

u. and

1956.
8...

www, EM”
mumps“

Its

my “~26,

Kuhn,

8.1. and MM, 1.: Paychoais During mew-9mm

Bushman he the Them? of
1952.

312302

Therapy,

Am. 3»

WM,

�������MW“: ﬁwzww/Z

WW!
::

Var/7

.

a;

/W‘
/
/

MMﬁw l-I’M)
/, VMW

5/

We W /
'

-

’

/

ri

'

L

444:1”
/~57:é'(/

*'

.

'

�/WW
WQMW
We. WDZM/JMD szd
4

”Ma/Z7444444944“
M—IWM W43,
g;
ﬁw/
444
W544.»
MM
ﬂWM
AM MW ZIMMWQ
L

SCAMUE‘D

%

”M W“
”774/

W'

AWQQ
”W47
ﬂaw/44¢;”jg Mix/«442

�ﬂ

,

V

MW/a/é/WWM
Mat/c9245.?

M/W7M7Wa.

MW/ZWa/d —%¢%7AQWW

2%
H

M AA/W/Wd4

Mama/21¢

#wdfm?/
WWWWX‘JP ﬂux/(‘5‘
WWW/LWMW/AW
W%WW&amp; ,MAW’ZmV/
%/laﬂ6¢r¢£Wﬂu~

WM 30%....

.

�@:

’OZQJWWM

%W
M,:/éw€

£W7WW
éwaf‘W

Jazz/WW //~JW’{)W
W
/ W,”
make—4441M

@ace
WMA,
W
mg
WWW—jfszd, éﬂfﬁé;e.

I

wmbéMW

ﬂW;
WWW
MW
@yagﬁa
/
mm

V
UZW‘ﬂm
W4
M
ﬂed/2W

"

�W cam/um aim W
,mmvwr‘MA/ﬂﬂ
M Ma ://Z~M~/Z~;/

.

.2.

‘

W
ﬁWZW/LM/AM

WYAMCMMWWM
WW

M562Qﬂﬁ7~fw
W/QWWMW
/¢éa¢d/W
@ngaiu/é
Mh/o/VW

/MM*/WwWéAﬂ.—A
74%. MW/%Wé&lt;~v
ﬂms
M—/k

MM
ﬂoWW/I
ﬁ/ch/M
ﬂWM,W/%9%Wﬂ-

WK
WW
%W
MMWMWWJ

�3WWﬂw/y/QWW7/W

/x£¢¢:W/ZW

~

ﬂ Mé/éex WA’8
75WW/iu7sﬁéw/A/AW/o
ﬂmwMM éﬂyiw/(Wga

ﬁ

WQM/yr/x
M.

inAM.
ﬂ/j/W/W/fgl/M ﬁﬁéz)’

aim/ah‘muzt

V

4

UM
a/“Z
A/dxﬁAMMW

-‘

��;WW%AM a/A/W

&amp;M
MmW%M;/A

Adm/M' ”#7

Wet/«.4145

W%WZ;¢M¢MA

w!
W
ﬁﬂéﬂﬁfdeWQMW'
WWWW m

km,MW7ML
L'

MM
_

WI/Jﬁ

W

W

.

'

-

�Q

.

MM
W
WWW
WM‘“
~AAAM/AAWM4’W

AM‘v/Wzy’g

A

'

$4MM wz/Z’WWW/

AMAWW AWM

�WWW
“WMMW
MM

WW

MMWMI "WK,
MZMMMVMW
ML,
I'M/”MW

W
W
ﬂbthxWM
WWW
/A%W/2Wg

MM7 MW.

V

WM

gifMMWﬂ/%M%‘7

4 MW
MZM
WM
7/134
(12%)
Mc/Zzw/anéﬂff"
Wm/m

Mzgf

�0%,.
MAW/WW wWM
Wr/WA/ZnaWk/
WWW—MW
//6W7/» f/A/ay/MW/

W

9Z2WWA»
ZaWZM'
A:
4w/
W/ﬁ
UV

ngégfiﬂmm

”2% M”;

j

�“”1“ ”PM“ “was

by ehetmeheek end euheequent

um

correlations batman elm

traumatic

eenelueiane from previous etudiee ere

m «was; We
Ge”

cut-cone have been unsuccessful.

«muted,

1

however. A11 pastime ﬁlth-A
~

seated to eleetroeheek thenpy nutter alteretione in the

"

electmneemme

patterns. Three pltteme ere generally described as 1) the

am ”3'“? am

of high voltage which pregneeeee to burst activity; the 3) Mutation at but:
3

frequencies in rate and amplitude. There 1e e direct relation between the
-

of these changes, and the

utmtien point of

number and frequency

ehmge 1e deeeriheé, which

meat, but whieh, seemingly,

frequeney and the type or

is

or treatments. In may

an

be maintained by

eebjeeahe

further

’6

‘

treetmt,

ship between degree of manifest

M0113
memory

the cited authors

is

lees and centueion

maneephnlegnphio abnormality. Ceeee ere eited of severe

the leek er

and

mm

‘

the degree of e

memory

We

with

significant electroencephalographic (ﬂange; and
ﬂeece: aﬁWii..¢m”e in cerebral rhythm without. with“ clinical

m

Manet memory inpeimnt. In theee zeperte, aphasia in "month"
he: on such organic ashram also earmletihg poorly we azmm
rem! te ,

.,

not inereeeed. Alec, such electmeneephalegmmw

Another area of easement

few treatments and without

6:3

7‘
g“3*

�PM

n2.

awn”, homer.

Two

my be cited which mud n oomlatiem

ham

clinical improvemnt. Rowland, Halo
mud, Kaufman and Peanut: in this 19% study of involutional woman ~( chums
in the olectmncophalegm and in the accretion of 17 katostoroida new

Electmncaphalognphic oranges

wing alien-omen]:
ens-251, 19M).

and

at agitated depreaeion, Paychoum. Hod. Q:
a relation bunch changes in their clinical

therapy

roporbed

activity as the disturbed be:havior boom now must, tho 13 cps activity incmaed. So treatment
induced bohuviounl immanent, 13 ops activity diminished. with recurrent»
of symptm, thorn m.- an increase in the 1 time 13 ops activity.
rating scale and the per cent time

manly,

Mort

Pmdnm

by

Theory of
a

Bath (changes

Eloctroconmlaiw

EGT

action, we and

”no. of mums in which

EEG

13 cps

in the ma under Rumbas-ate Amsthaain
and Their Significance for the

hum

cm. Hem-own.

1. 261-280,

a relationship hottest: thiepontom manna

We: and the recovery process “solicited.

to inpmvomant.

By

that

it

Both noted

that slow

irregular in appuranm,
could not be ntiatuctorily related

mm antivity as new in a routine rcéord
and be confirmed the reports

1951) described

wan

adminlltermg an intravenous aolutian of a barbituuto

thmpentone, Roth elicited characteristic changes in the ma titer metroshock in mxy subjcct. Early than waé random irregular claw mu untidty,
bilaterally
which, with more treatment, increased to a highly

We),

synchronous, high amplitude delta runs and

bursts. The” urn chiefly

2.3 cm, with voltages of 200.350 uv and cantlnuoua durations of 30.80
seconds. Winn the mating mcord cum“: rhythmic: Golta activity, umpontem increased

its basic

pm»

its

Imam.

voltage and duration, spread
Roth believed

its

urea,

and

decmuod

that than chug" warn rehtod to the

a! recovery, although, mo concluded:

" Hanover, my development

at

a typical we cameo does slot ensure memory and 10 a! the 36 pntiontl who

am

men a

mag. rams to

me for longer m'tw wreaks. m

M
"Wu-v-

3‘
'

�~3¢

tmsicnt impmment in album).

"lat-d. to tho

EEG

«mating

EEG

oondition mom to be
pationto. .1: in are correct in

W cm in thanmommue aﬂoat

it would

ammo: with tho

seem, 31mg mat.

tho

of tho

patients develop typical changes, that the physiological basis for in-

provmnt is acquired by the majority or one»; it.
«man in promoting recovery.“

w or' my not pm

In the course of studiea of altered brain function induced by electron

at this mums. Hospital in New York, further day. on the ”Intimaships betmn EEG chanson and :31ch effects of electroshock were collected.
shock

The general

remain of

mum innoMga’oiom on the alterations in the

elontmhook mm omﬂmd, but. also, I doﬂnito relationship
between on“ attacks and tho clinical remit
«immtmted. Throo fooi
are presented today:
£30 with

-

m

(1)

Tho EEG

patterns following electroshock and their relation to

mpmmt.
(2) mo intercormlationl of

nativity.

mama; qmtifioaumo

or down

"

(3) The rolotion of those obaomtiona to a theory of electroshock
I

.

SUBJECTS

‘

action.

w W:

prior to treatment.

1

Twentyofour

common“ portion“ referred for ehctm»

shook were awaited.
An 8

and bipolar moording was

Elootmnoephalogms

channel Madonna instrument ,

and. Hypomtiution

mdlo electrodes,

m the only activation

technio mod. During ornament. records wore taken on the day
treatment, generally 25 to 31 hours after

worn don.

trauma“

after a.

.

��In this group

in

mt chum amiable or who

moan change was

transient immanent. 3m

amt. impa‘md.

of

chm ﬂuctuatians in behavior, at tins appearing.

appeamd much as they did

EV.

diffsmd in tha
third groups

mmm

or?

2

-

Strauss (Clinical

ham.
Bruin

that by tha and

boron.

Wu
In w

of the difficulties in evaluating impinmeﬁ'o.
aa’oimataa

of

w

H111 be
A

in than patients.

change

cam, by using this thmefald classiﬁmtim,

firlt and

sown pnuanu

shaved only equivocal or

But the ammo was not sua’oainod, no

tm¢mnt, they
We are “are

might. have

plum

ware

distinct.
total at 160

thus

11001113

differences botmn the

mm obtained in than

manta. Following the maggostion or Dr. Rana
me! mctmmphubgmc Studies
Garrolations a!
«.-

Electmneophalogmphiu and Antonia chanson in Cases with Organic

Dim.

Al. J.

Payout“... 3&amp;1: hz—so. 19%); the delta ind»:

:19th for thm lads (twahlupuriem.

anterior tampon)... vortex.
«comm of renaming for own land. The

and puriﬁed-aunt love)

for 180

don: mm is deﬁned

an the ﬁgment.

slmr.

1m

m

tin maupiod by waves

or

7

tsp:

daluninéex for the three loads, and the: highest
in my 1nd ware ten mm: and in the final tabulntiom
The average

or
c1011»

Simultmebunly, tho ruéorci was scanned for the slowest freqmncy

m imuﬁod M. lean twice
wlta

Have;

ed, but

ivity,

m

in my load; the highest voltage of my
and. the ruration 01’ the longest burst. %er aspect: recordwe! in m final Malawian, worn m mgulamy of ham act.-

aim of Alpha activity“

and um

degm fraqmciu and amplitude

of fast activitiea. “than indie” ‘14 net land
study;

Qua

Inn

«mm diam

not.
by

thumb": to statistical
meow. Fat amounts." mm

identifiablo in all tho
the clinical administration of barbiturates. A: thin

'

��07‘!

Similar

mm» or the relation at nah or the: Macs and minim

mm mm mm. be tho group cum than boron. Slide 2
mmmmlaumormauummmmwmt. 1‘1»me
result.

the

much

upmd group Jump! to

cut-1y lam-wad

and unimpmvod group: mm: a

by tho 10-12

10—80%
A

52:: by tho 7-9

m
1123mm

tmtmntz mm

gnaw,

alum

-

the

#0

tmamm.

‘

similar out or our”: is demonstrated in 511603 for the man

um delta 1:: am 1nd.
In tho nut. slide the man ﬂaunt Imam in recorded, ma this
ahm tho am aigniﬂunt nhﬂomhipl. Whiz. the mania imprond

highest
too

‘

pox-«em.

patients than delta waves dam to 3 61:! or I.” by the «com! we]: or
tmtmnt, th- at)»: two groups mm: man h 03:: by my fourth wok cf

tutti-oat.

and;
The

S

and: improved group

tho fourth
the

much

new by

show

highar mm... by the

not the elitism:

Madly, slide 6
Vat

«minim for tho mean highest amntndu

chm the am

are

”mam far :11 three groups.

manta the mean

aunties: of bursts.

111

(nu-ﬂint}.

In

than

ml: of

Hot noted

long bun-at”

treatment. Burnt:

m

no less

”mg. m.

wave

neural

more than 7

{remnant in

W

m significantly 9119er

hen, the is the fact” or “gummy of hm“.
£91m!- rmthntly mm more maul“ in troqmcy

“plum!” than in the other We groups;
than studio: my be interpmud u demonstrating that

manure: of slow
and

The

patient: lbw longer hunts, winging
1W
tho third

unimprmd and modes-«uh inpmvod groups and

and

mm: mm: and by

activity

aria

from the

«wk

01‘

than

am myuological pm”,

m «imam in ablation to the diaturbmoos in earn-bun.

function induhd by elactmahock.

�3. ﬁnally, can these alterations in

npoets of «tubal function mid:
In

tho» undies,

the myriad.

1mm:

current-d with own:but been altered by olectroshaok?

mama af «tubal function were assayed-

tut or Weinstoin and m um 01' double

stimulation and

tom

text

showed a

W test

thus EEG.

013110?

any

m we ho

of

tan.

In than

ation of intuvumu

memory and

mum”

sodium

until.

racing. 0: than threw indies», only

correlation with

the subject

simultaneous

is

interviewed

1.21th and can
and’

qmatiom of orient-

mm, the quantum an reputed errors in

orientation, mnfabuhuan, dank). at 3.11am: and rsduplicauon are

mud

n 'poaitiw' myul tut, and are indicatiw of cerebral wilful-mum;
Comet roman to than qmstim after and an a ‘mgatiw' W'm “at.
In the wt click, #7. the pox-0mm positivc mm tom are
4

,

m
wanna. botmn tn.

cmpund for
meat. me

much

in titanium.

of the

m1.

gmupa, with the number or weeks

ovary patient

much

improm and

at

trut-

m other tam gram

.

in the and: improved group had u positive

mm by the third weak a! mama, m m abnomaiity panama;
in tho unimproved swaps only me patimm

had a

positive

as tram-£19m «opus command mam-m.
In 311d.
high degree

8. the an relation between,

1‘

EEG

abnomlity

shows a

maul? The“

.

’

tinntmaus tactile tom

inclines

alarm). maxim and tho

distinct carnation which in autism

tinny signifiemt.
Hint of tho

an

m1 and thin

ahmd no won-elation with

mama’s, it. can be concluded that

tutu of wry and
impromt. In an:

and the

than are axiom! typo. of mmbml

dam-

m cannot. speak in gm tom 9! g hrk a! comhum
batman m m and 00me dyarnncum or organic payment,
function tad taut

�‘9.
this point I should like us muss m findings and mass
thoughts as to thsir significance for s theory or electmshoak mm.
At.

m

moss

is 11m. doubt that eloctmshwk

m. It

3.:

all

upmsds to

almr,

symwio,

We.

induces delta nbnomnty

1::

tbs

may frontal, but with Mmamrtmmm,
With

immune trusmt thaﬁsqmncios beam

the smplitudu higher, tho

bunt activity longer sad more regular.

mile den: sbnomlity is pussnt in every mpord “ﬁr olsctmhock, its
Roth‘s mum‘s mammg Manning emu .mmw
«gm 9.:
with bat-bum“ are Digniﬂmt 1n pmﬁmg the 11m” emu Mum by

«wk.

furthsr slntroahwk. In sans subjects

sanity

is

not. induced

despite atoms.”

Our aux-relations of

Guam

0!."

test, um s meeasary
chm-"u fail to wear in the

tram.

delta

ammlity with 13pm srs

«:1»th thorium.

significant far tbs ”amiss: o:
alteration in cox-ohm function as

mm

War, a high dogma «hits smorAn

early, autumn

mm

by the EEG, and

(and in the

m1 taut),

also

by

m.

'

pmummﬁSiM for improvemt. when such
EEG

H

u sign-

nificmt clinical improvement V111 rail to wear in the patient' a hshs'dar.
with wry loss, points
Tbs rm. that than camlatiws mm not
to the poasihiuty that. this is not a significant master in improvement.
In conclusion, than studs.“ land uppers to s theory at E8?
action moﬁntly unwanted by Gamma sud can at us (Kuhn). Thou

“at

‘

authors postulstsd that

wwwmt fanning olactroshoek is than malt

of tbs amtion 1:: tbs patient 91' a min at altered brain function in
much now puttéms or mputim, a-srtioulorly mm a! denial; my be main--

mm. mm m nudist Winn that :5 «land milieu of «avatar-J.
museum u assured by mu abnormality is ,s pm~mu1s1u for improvisamt. ‘ro this extent the first. part. of ﬁns unseen-am Wall is
’“PPGTst

�%

m

W, mm

«was: m-

studs.» punt to
ﬂuaiﬁﬂﬁim of

m “grammar of quantum"

Wm

at

mum

'

�Dr. Joseph S. A. Miller.

To:
From:

Dr. Max Fink

May

I

have your approval to submit

this technical paper to the Eastern
EEG Society for its October meeting in
Bethesda ?

��mmmMmmwmtmmam
mm m m mum
as?

(3)

a»

in

mm. warm “at m

m a: m mam a: mm mm: mwvm

mmmmymmm mm,mzm

�112:?

My)

Quantitative Studies 2;: Slow

Wave

I M
9/5"!»

Activitz

Following Electroshock
Max

Fink,

HOD.

Robert L. Kahn, PhoD.

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks, New York

Despite repeated attempts correlations between slow wave activity induced
by electroshock and subsequent therapeutic outcasts have been unsuccessful. Howconclusions‘pfrom

W;

”avg/a...

rewart-m
previous studies?“
"W Wm“

Ail—pam-

over, certain
mduuo
are
Electroshock therapy suffer alterations in the electroencephalogram«a»‘ﬁz
9%.-

.

3m

Three pattems are generally describedzu

l)

b

slowing of the alpha frequen-

cies; 2) the appearance of random, synmetxic slow wave activity, generally of;
activity, and 3) diminution of beta frehigh voltage which

Wﬁbwburst

quencies in rate and amplitude. There is a direct relation between the degree
of these changes, and the number and frequency of treatments. In many subjects
a saturation point of change

treatment, but

the pretreatment levels
mnnbe r,

described, which can be maintained by further

is
which”
are reversible.

Qfﬂdeef Mir.
not increased.
The

ographic changes

the

is

«he,

we!“ c,at!”

5mm electroencephal-

rate of return of the cerebral patterns to

is generally l to

b,

weeksxgﬂ’ipending

directly ugh- on

frequency and the type of treatment.

cited authors is the lack of direct relationship between degree of manifest memory loss and confusion and the degree
Another area of agreement among the

of electroencephalographic abnormality. Cases are describedgevere

memory changes

with few treatments and without significant electroencephalographic change; and

also of severe changes in cerebral
or memory impairment.

In these reports,

Weclinical
is

correlatgug poorly With
organicconfusion also
Presented

at the Eastern

E E

W

rhytlmls without manifest

0 Society, Bethedda)

-~--

clinical confusion

&gt;

Md

“HA0?

8 such

gM’Y’EJ

results.
-

Septembee 30,

”0...... «.~.—.._._,___...~—-—

4...“ ._....

195?

�Two

studies, however,

may be

cited as noting a correlation between

ectro-

u:
encephalographic changes and clinical improvement. Hoagland, Malamud, Kaufman
rt-

ﬁdand Pincus in

their l9h6 study of involutional

L’

women

‘1)

-

tonnage-MW:
reported a

=§W19§9+

relation between changes in their clinical rating scale and the per- cent time
4'40

W61
131, ‘ctivity.

more than

3.2% activity increased.

cw

activity diminished.
%

A

time 1301;: a
More

As

treatment induced behaviojral improvement,—-B=eps

tivity.C3,)
Roth

ﬂ"

there

was an

MK,

increase in the

.

Mow-W

.--__

,

WWW-WBW‘UI
relationship
msngmmeWeWw5M—
the

Mby.
~.

the disturbed behavior became more manifest, the

With recurrence of symptoms,

e WA

recently,

As

.

1

described a

between thiopentone induced

EEG

changes and

recovery process. Roth noted

that slow wave activity as seen in a routine post-shock record was irregular in
appearance, and he confirmed the reports that it could not be satisfactorily

m

,

related to improvement.

the

However, by administering an intravenous

thiopeﬁ‘tone, he

elicited characteristic

changes

solution of

in the

EEG

after

electroshock in every subject. Early’there was random irregular slow wave act-

ivity, whichyéith

increased to a highly rhythmic, bilaterally

more treatmen

synchronous, high
amplitude delta runs and

M ILKoVol'PS

bursts.

These were

with voltages of 200-350 is and continuous durations of 30-80 seconds.

When

its

the resting record evinced rhythmic delta activity, thiopentone increased
voltage and duration, spread

its

believed that these changes were

m F4»
lemma;

chiefly 2-3

area, and decreased its basic frequency.
related to the process of recovery, and

Both
v

�he concluded: “The development of a typical
and 10 of the 36

patients

who

attained such a

than two weeks. But transient improvement

related to the
ing the

EEG

EEG

change does not ensure recovery

failed torsmit for longer
in clinical condition seemed tolae
change

in these patients.
changes with the therapeutic effect it
EEG

change even

If

we

are correct in connect-

would seem,

since most of the

patients develop typical changes, that the physiological basis for improvement
is acquired by the majority of cases; it may or may not prove effective in promoting recovery."

Whileathesettwoﬁstudiessdemonstrate a relationship between clinical result
and

EEG

abnormality, the majority of reports

fail to

do so.

It is

not likely

that this discrepancy is the result of different populations, but rather, the
differences in methods of evaluating improvement, the time of evaluation, and
differences in estimating changes in cerebral function.
In the course ofestudies of altered brain function induced by electroshock

at the Hillside Hespital in

further data on the relationship! be~
tween EEG changes and clinical effects of electroshock were collected. The
general results of previous investigations on the alterations in the EEG with
New

York,

electroshock were confirmed, but also, a definite relationship between

effects and the clinical result

was demonstrated. Three

EEG

foci are presented

today:
(1)

The EEG

(2)

The

patterns following electroshock and their relation to improvement.
intercorrelations of different quantifications of delta activity.

(3) Athe relation of these observations to a theory of electroshock action.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD:

Twenty~four consecutive patients referred

for electroshock

were studied. Electroencephalograms were done

treatment, at weekly intervals during treatment and after treatment.

prior to
An 8

channel

�.5‘
but the dramatic

in the

change so evident

patient continued to

first

group was not apparent.

Each

noticable disturbance such as obsessional think-

show some

ing, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
C.
whom

Minimalyy or Unimproved:

In this group were placed seven patients in

change was not clearly noticable or who showed only equivocal or

improvement.
improved.

Some

showed

transient

fluctuations in behavior, at times appearing

But the changes were not

sustained,

so

that

somewhat

by the end of treatment,

they appeared.much as they did before.
we

are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement. Others might

have differed in the estimates of change in these

patients. In any case,

using this threefold classification, the differences between the

third groups will

be

by

first and

distinct.

EVALUATION OF EEG RECORDS:

A

total of

jects. Following the suggestion of

LJ.aPsychiatemgggnehZ-Sewwl9hhd,

w

160 records were obtained

in these subStrauss

the delta index was determined for three lead

(frontal-parietal, anterior temporal - vertex, and parietal-ear
lobe) for 180 seconds of recording for each lead. The delta index is defined
combinations

as the perbcent time occupied by waves of

7

cps or slower.

The average

for the three leads, and the highest delta index in any lead
indices used in the final tabulation.
index

Simultaneously, the record

was scanned

delta-

were the

for the slowest frequency identified

at least twice in any lead; the highest voltage of any delta wave; and the durb
ation of the longest burst.

(V)

�Ch.
Medcrart instrument, needle electrodes, and bipolar recording was used.

Hyperb

ventilation was the only activation technic utilized. During treatment,:records
were taken the day

after, generally 25 to

31 hours

The treatments were administered by the
C

h? electrostimulator.

number of treatments

after treatment.

staff psychiatrists, using

a Reiter

Treatment schedules were three times a week; and the

varied

from 9 to 33.

As

patients

Showed

clinical improve-

ment, the
There

psychiatrist tended to give fewer treatments, and more widelyfspaced.
were 15 women and 9 men in the series, and ages ranged from.2h to 68 with

a median of h7.
EVALUATION QE CLINICAL RESPONSE:

All the patients
eight

were observed

for at least

after termination of therapy.
determined on the basis of the res-

weeks

patient's reaponse to electroshock was
ident psychiatrist's impression, staff opinion, the nurse's notes and the clinical evaluation of the supervisor in charge of electroshock. The patients were
The

divided into three groups
A.

Markeglz ggproved:

~

markedly improved, moderately improved and unimproved.
The 11

cases in this group were regarded as showing

recovery or marked improvement. These patients no longer showed the
which brought them

symptoms

into the hOSpital; their doctors felt they were better;

and

the nurses' notes confirmed such aspects as being able to sleep without medic-

ation, better appetite, and improved capacity to get along with the other patients and participate in hospital activities.
six patients in this group showed some improvebut continued to manifest indications of mental illness. These patients

B. iModerately ggprove : The
ment

typically Showed symptomatic relief, i§,, acute depressive features might be gone,

�On

the basis of these five indices of slow

wave

activity the records

placed in a rank order from the greatestabnormality to the lowest.
cords were then divided into

3

groups

-

g

uﬁbr

were

The 160

third - high degree

EEG

re-

abnorm-

ality) and lowest third =£w degree abnormality.
RESULTS:1.0ur results show a positive correlation between early high degree

EEG

abnormality and improvement. These relationships are demonstrated in
Slide

I.

utilizing these quantifications of slow wave abnormality induced by electroshock, we conclude that such EEG abnormality induced in the first 3 weeks of
‘By

is

treatment

an

essential pre-requisite for the short term favorable clinical

response.
2. What relationships exist between each of the indices,

clinical response, and then

/

amongst each

first with

the

other?

Similar analyses of the relation of each of the indices and clinical result

identical curves to the group curve shown before. Slide 2 shows the
relation of the delta index to improvement. The mean index in the much im-

showed

proved group jumps to

52%

by the 7-9 treatment; while the moderately improved

and unimproved groups show a gradual, slow increase to 10-20% by the 10-12

treatment.
A

similar set of curves id demonstrated in slide

3

for the

mean

highest

percent time delta in one lead.
In the next
shows

the

show

delta

other

two

Slide

same

slide the

slowest frequency

is recorded,

significant relationships. While the

and this) tbo/

much improved

patients

to 3 cps or less by the second week of treatment,
groups Sarely reach )4 cps by the fourth week of treatment.
waves down

5

shows the same

much improved group show

week the

mean

correlations for the

mean

and-

*{e

highest amplitude, the

higher voltages by the second week and by the fourth

differences are persistent for all three groups.

�Finally, slide

6 shows

the

duration of bursts.

mean

The

records of the

much Improved

patients

third

treatment. Bursts are less frequent in the unimproved and

week of

show

longer bursts, averaging more than

7

seconds by the
mod-

erately improved groups and are significantly shorter in duration. not noted
here, however, is the factor of regularity of bursts. In the longer bursts,
wave forms frequently were more regular in frequency and amplitude, than in the
other

two groups.

These studies may be interpreted as demonstrating

of slow wave activity arise from the

same

that each of these measures

physiological process, and assume the

significance in relation to the disturbances in cerebral function induced
by electroshock.
same

I

3. Finally, can these alterations in the
pects of cerebral function which

EEG

may have been

be correlated with other ap-

altered by electroshock? In

these studies, three other indices of cerebral function were assayed - the
amytal test of Weinstein and Kahg? tests of double simultaneous tactile stim-

ulatioaj and tests of
amytal

test

showed a

memory and

recalfz)

Of

these three indices, only the

positive correlation with

improvement and.with the EEG.

results were presented recently at the American Psychiatric Association
we will forgo a discussion at this time. ‘93
__,wle

These
and

It.;::; suffice

demonstrates the correlation berel
éF,
tween the amytal eating and the high degreerhEG abnormality. n—v_
this iigﬁgLshows
ﬁb£

that the next slide, #

7

'

,

distinct relationship between the two factors.
At this point I should like to summarize our findings and express some
thoughts as to their significance for a theory of electroshock action. There
is little doubt that electroshock induces delta abnormality in the EEG. It is
a

symmetric, chiefly

frontal, but with increasing treatment, spreads to all leads.

With increasing treatment the frequencies became slower, the amplitudes higher,

the burst activity longer and more regular.

in every record after electroshock,

its

‘While

degree

delta abnormality is present

is variable. Roth's experiment's

�~8-

inducing increasing delta abnormality with barbiturate are significant in predicting the later changes induced by further electroshock. In some subjects
however, a high degree delta abnormality

is not

induced despite extensive

treatment.
correlations of degree of delta abnormality with improvement are also
significant for the theory of the mechanism of electroshock. An early, SusOur

tained alteration in cerebral function as measured by the EEG, and also by the
amytal test, appears to be a necessary pre-requisite for improvement. Where

*-

in the amytal test), the:
the patient's behavior.
€l%n ificant clinical improvement will fail to occur in
fact that the correlations were not evident with memory loss, points to the
possibility that this is not a significant factor in improvement.
such changes

fail

to occur in the

EEG

(and

The

In conclusion, these studies lend support )to a theory of EST action recently
(Kahn)(.r These
authors postulated that
enumerated by Weinstein and one of us
improvement following electroshock

is the result

of a milieu of altered brain function in which

of the creation in the patient

new

patterns of adaptation, part-

icularly those of denial, may be maintained. These EEG studies demonstrate
that an altered milieu of cerebral function as measured by delta abnormality
is a pre-requisite for improvement. To this extent the first part of tbs Weinstein-Kahn hypothesis

is supported.

Secondly, these studies point to the

validity or quantitative

the elucidation of mechanisms of behavior.

EEG

studies for

�1533

m a???"

September 21, 1955
MEMORANDUM

TO:
FROM:

Dr. Soseph S. A. Miller
Dr.

(1)

Max

Fink

entitled "Quantitative Studies of Slow Wave Activity
Following Electroshock" will be presented at the Eastem EEG meeting
at
Our paper

Bethesda, Friday September 30th.
(2)

May

I

have permission for Dr. Kahn (the co-author) and myself to

attend the sessions of the society?

�(new?

'

£5)“;

saw» 21.. 1955
m!

m1

Mamaahamr

”gum

(1) our

W amt-MM *mpmuu saw» a: 3m 1m Mtiviw

(a) lily

1:

MWMWﬂnbapWMWMMWmM at
whim! is!»

ma pammaa tear m».

”aim at the am

m (m mama!) and W ta

357‘

�III:
Quantitative Studies 2;

Slow Wave

9/55

Activity

Following'Electroshock
Fink,

Max

MOD.

Robert L. Kahn, Ph.D.

Hillside Hospital,

Glen Oaks, New York

Despite repeated attempts, correlations between slow

wave

activity in-

duced by electroshock and subsequent therapeutic outcome have been unsuccessful.
However,

certain conclusions are warranted from previous studies (1). Electro-

shock therapy induces

alterations in the electroencephalogram in all subjects.

Three patterns are generally described: 1) slowing of the alpha frequencies;
2) the appearance of random, symmetric slow'wave

voltage which

cies in rate

may

activity, generally of high

appear as burst activity; and 3) diminution of beta frequenThere

and amplitude.

is

a

direct relation between the degree of

these changes, and the number and frequency of treatments.
a saturation point of change

is described,

to the pretreatment levels

The

1

to h weeks, depending directly on the

treatment.

relationship between degree of manifest

memory

degree of electroencephalographic abnormality.

memory impairment.

in cerebral

loss and confusion

of

direct

and the

Cases are described of severe

at the Eastern

EEG

rhythms without manifest

In these reports,

ganic confusion also correlates poorly with
Evesented

is the lack

with few treatments and without significant electroencephalographic

change; and also of severe changes

confusion of

further

Such induced electroencephal-

Another area of agreement among the cited authors

memory changes

subjects

rate of return of the cerebral patterns

is generally

number, frequency and the type of

many

which can be maintained by

treatment, but which is apparently not increaSed.
ographic changes are reversible.

In

it is

clinical

stated that such or-

clinical results.

Society, Bethesda, September 30, 1955.

�-2studies, however,

Two

cited as noting a correlation between

may be

electroencephalographic changes and clinical improvement. Hoagland, Malamud,

in their l9h6 study of involutional

Kaufman and Pincus

women

relation between changes in their clinical rating scale
time more than 13 cycles per second

activity.

and the

per-cent

the disturbed behavior be-

As

manifest, the fast activity increased.

came more

(2) reported a

treatment induced behavior-

As

al improvement, such fast activity diminished. With recurrence of
there

was an

More

induced

increase in the

Roth (3) described a

recently,

EEG

time 13 cycles per second

%

provement.

Roth noted

it

tone, he elicited characteristic changes in the
was random

irregular

and

bursts.

w

act-

wave

solution of the thicpen-

EEG

after electroshock in every

slow wave

activity, which increased

bilaterally synchronous, high

with mere treatment to a highly rhythmic,

litude delta runs

51

was

However, by administering an intravenous

subject. Early, there

that

irregular in appearance, and
could not be satisfactorily related to imr

ivityas seen in a routine post-shock record
reports that

activity.

relationship between thiopentone

changes and the recovery process.

he confirmed the

symptoms,

amp-

chiefly 2-3 cycles per second, with

These were

voltages of 200-350 microvolts.and continuous durations of 30-80 seconds.
the resting record evinced rhythmic delta activity, thiopentone increased
voltage and duration, spread

its

believed that these changes were

patients

than

But

two weeks.

related to the
ing the

patients

EEG

EEG

transient

change even

improvement

change does not ensure recovery

failed to remit for longer
in clinical condition seemed to be
change

in these patients. If

effect

it

we

are correct in connect-

would seem, since most of the

typical changes, that the physiological basis for

by the majority of cases;

moting recove 1y."

EEG

attained such a

changes with the therapeutic

deveLOp

is acquired

who

its

area, and decreased its basic frequency. Roth
related to the process of recovery, and he

concluded: "The development of a typical
and 10 of the 36

'When

it may or may not prove

improvement

effective in pro-

�.3While these two

studies demonstrate a relationship between clinical result'

and EEG abnormality, the majority of

reports

fail

to

do

It is

so.

not likely

that this discrepancy is the result of different populations, but rather, the
differences in

methods of evaluating improvement, the time of

evaluation, and

differences in estimating changes in cerebral function.
In the course of studies of altered brain function induced by electro-

at

shock

the Hillside Hospital

in

New

York,

further data

on

the relationship

clinical effects of electroshock were collected. The
general results of previous investigations on the alterations in the EEG with

between

EEG

changes and

electroshock were confirmed, but also, a definite relationship between

effects and the clinical result

was

EEG

demonstrated. Three foci are presented

today:
(1) (The

EEG

patterns following electroshock

and

their relation to

imp

provement.
(2)

The

(3)

The

SUBJECTS

intercorrelations of different quantifications of delta activity.
relation of these observations to a theory of electroshock acticn.

AND METHOD:

Twenty-four consecutive patients referred

for electro-

shock were studied. Electroencephalograms were done

prior to treatment, at weekly intervals during treatment
An 8

and

after treatment.

channel Medcraft instrument, needle electrodes, and bipolar recording

was used.

Hyperventilation

was

the only activation technic utilized.

treatment, records were taken the day after, generally 25 to
treatment.
The

Reiter

C

31 hours

During

after

treatments were administered by the staff psychiatrists, using a
h?

electrostimulator.

Treatment schedules were three times a week;

and the number of treatments varied from 9 to 33.

improvement, the

As

patients

psychiatrist tended to give fewer treatments,

showed

clinical

and more widely

�.u.
There were 15 women and 9 men

spaced.

to

68

in the series,

and ages ranged from 2h

with a median of h7.
g3

EVALUATION

CLINICAL RESPONSE:

All the patients

were observed

for at least

eitht weeks after termination of therapy.
patient‘s reSponse to electroshock'was determined on the basis of the
resident psychiatrist's impression, staff opinion, the nurse's notes and the
clinical evaluation of the supervisor in charge of electroshock. The patients
The

were divided

into three groups - markedly improved, moderately improved and

unimproved.
A.

Markedly Improved: The 11 cases

in this group

showing recovery or marked improvement. These
symptoms which

brought them into the beepital;

patients

were regarded as

no longer showed

the

their doctor felt they were

better; and the nurses' notes confirmed such aSpects as being able to sleep
without medication, better appetite, and improved capacity to get along with
the other patients and participate in hospital
B.
improvement

activities.

six patients in this group showed some
but continued to manifest indications of mental illness. These

Moderately,lmproved:

patients typically

The

showed symptomatic

relief, i:g;, acute depressive features

might be gone, but the dramatic change so evident in the

apparent.

Each

patient continued to

show some

first

group was not

noticable disturbance such as

obsessional thinking, paranoid ideas, or somatic preoccupation.
C.

Minimally g£_unimproved: In

this group

were placed seven

patients

in whom change was not clearly noticable or who showed only equivocal or transient improvement. Some showed fluctuations in behavior, at times appearing
somewhat improved.

But the changes were not

treatment, they appeared

much

sustained, so that by the

as they did before.

end of

�.5are aware of the difficulties in evaluating improvement. Others might
have differed in the estimates of change in these patients. In any case, by
we

using this threefold classification, the differences between the
groups

first and third

will be distinct.
93

EVALUATION

delta index

EEG RECORDS:

was

A

total of

160 records were obtained

in these sub-

jects. Following the suggestion of Strauss (h), the
determined for three lead combinations (frontal-parietal,

anterior temporal - vertex, and parietal-ear lobe) for 180 seconds of recording
for each lead. The delta index is defined as the per-cent time occupied by
waves of 7 ops or slower.

delta-index for the three leads, and the
highest delta index in any lead were the indices used in the final tabulation.
The average

for the slowest frequency idenp
tified at least twice in any lead; the highest voltage of any delta wave; and
the duration of the longest burst.
Simultaneously, the record

0n the

was scanned

basis of these five indices of slow

wave

activity the records

were placed in a rank order from the

greatest abnormality to the lowest.

160 records were then divided

into

groups

abnormality, and lowest third

=

RESULTS:

in Slide

3

- i;g=_upper third=

The

high degree

EEG

low degree abnormality.

l.

Our

EEG

abnormality and improvement. These relationships are demonstrated

results

show a

positive correlation between early high degree

I.

utilizing these quantifications of slow wave abnormality induced
electroshock, we conclude that such EEG abnormality induced in the first 3
By

of treatment

is an.essential pre-requisite for the short

term favorable

by
weeks

clinical

response.
2.

What

relationships exist between each of the indices,

clinical response,

and then amongst each other?

first with

the

�~6-

Similar analyses of the relation of each of the indices and clinical result

identical curves to the group curve shown before. Slide 2 shows the
relation of the delta index to improvement. The mean index in the much improved
showed

group jumps to

52%

by the 7-9 treatment; while the moderately improved and un-

improved groups show a gradual, slow

increase to

10720% by

similar set of curves is demonstrated in slide

A

3

the

10-12

for the

mean

treatment.
highest

percent time delta in one lead.
In the next slide the
shows the same

delta

show

other

two groups

to

the

same

much improved group show

week

h cps by the

much improved

While the much improved

fourth

correlations for the

week of

mean

all three

6 shows the mean duration of

patients

this, too,
patients

treatment.

highest amplitude, the

higher voltages by the second week and by the fourth

the differences are persistent for
Finally, slide

and

cps or less by the second week of treatment, the

3

rarely readh

5 shows

is recorded,

slowest frequency

significant relationships.

waves down

Slide

mean

show

groups.

bursts.

The

longer bursts, averaging more than

records of the
7

seconds by

the third week of treatment. Bursts are less frequent in the unimproved and
moderately improved groups and are significantly shorter in duration. Not noted

here, however, is the factor of regularity of bursts. In the longer bursts,
forms frequently were more regular

wave

in frequency and amplitude, than in the other

two groups.
These

ures of
the

studies

may be

interpreted as demonstrating that each of these meas-

activity arise from the same physiological process, and assume
significance in relation to the disturbances in cerebral function in-

31 w wave

same

duced by

electroshock.

3. Finally, can these alterations in the
pects of cerebral function which

may have been

EEG

be correlated with other as-

altered by electroshock? In

these studies, three other indices of cerebral function were assayed - the amytal

�-7-

test

of Weinstein and Kahn (5),

(6),

and

tests of

memory and

tal test

showed a

positive correlation with

tests of double simultaneous tactile stimulation
recall (7). Of these three indices, only the amyimprovement and with the EEG.

These

results were presented recently at the American Psychiatric Association and we
will forgo a discussion at this time. It may suffice that the next slide, # 7,
demonstrates the correlation between the responses on amytal
of

abnormality. This graph

EEG

tests

and the degree

distinct relationship between the

shows a

two

I

factors.
this point I should like to summarize our findings and express
thoughts as to their significance for a theory of electroshock action.
At

is little

doubt

that electroshock induces delta abnormality in the

symmetric, chiefly

There

It is

EEG.

frontal, but with increasing treatment, spreads to all leads.

increasing treatment the frequencies

With

some

became slower, the amplitudes

the burst activity longer and more regular. While delta abnormality

in every record after electroshock,

its

higher,

is present

is variable. Roth's experiment's

degree

inducing increasing delta abnormality with barbiturate are significant in predicting the later changes induced by further electroshock. In some subjects
however, a high degree delta abnormality

is not

induced despite extensive

treat-

ment.
Our

correlations of degree of delta abnormality with

significant for the theory of the

mechanism of electroShock.

tained alteration in cerebral function as measured
amytal

test,

such changes

clinical

improvement are also
An

early, sus-

by the EEG, and

also

by the

appears to be a necessary pre-requisite for improvement. Where

fail

to occur in the

improvement

in the amytal test), then significant
will fail to occur in the patient's behavior. The fact that
EEG

the correlations were not ivident with

(and

memory

loss, points to the possibility

that this is not a significant factor in improvement.
In conclusion, these studies lend support to‘a theory of
enumerated by Weinstein and one of us (Kahn) (8).

EST

These authors

action recently
postulated.that

�-8improvement following electroshock

of a milieu of

is the result of the creation in the patient

altered brain function in which new patterns of adaptation, part-

icularly those of denial, may be maintained. These EEG studies demonstrate
that an altered milieu of cerebral function as measured by delta abnormality is
a pre-requisite for improvement. To this extent the
first part of the weinsteinKahn

hypothesis

is supported.

Secondly, these studies point to the
.

for the elucidation of

validity of quantitative

mechanisms of behavior.

EEG

studies

�REFERENCES

l.

Chusid, Joseph G. and Pacella, Bernard L.:

the Electric Shock Therapies, J. Nerv.

The Electroencephalogram
&amp;

Dis., 11g: 95-107, 1952.

Ment.

Hoagland, H., Malamud, W., Kaufman, and Pincus, 6.:
encephalogram and

in the Excretion of

17

in

Changes

in the Electro-

Ketosteroids Accompanying Electro-

shock Therapy of Agitated Depression, Psychosom. Med., §; 2&amp;6-251, 19h6.

3. Roth, Martin: Changes in the

EEG

Under

Barbiturate Anesthesia Produced

Electroconvulsive Treatment and Their Significance for the Theory of
Action,

EEG

by
ECT

and Olin. Neurophys., 2; 261-280, 1951.

Strauss, Hans: Clinical

and Electroencephalographic Studies ~ Correlations

of Mental, Electroencephalographic and Anatomic Changes in Cases with
Organic Brain Disease,
So

Am.

J. Psychiat., 191:

and Kahn, R.L.:

weinstein, E.A.,

("Amytal Sodium")

Diagnostic

hZ-SO, l9hh.

Use of Amobarbital Sodium

in Organic Brain Disease,

Am.

J. Psychiat., 192: 12,

889-89h: 1953.

6. Fink, M., Green,

M.

and Bender, M.:

The Face-Hand

Test as a Diagnostic Sign

of Organic Mental Syndrome, Neurology, 2: h6-58, 1952.
7.

Karin, H., Fink,

M.

and Kwalwasser,

5.: Relation of

Changes

in

Memory and

Learning to Improvement in Electroshock, Conf. “eurologica, 1Q: 88-96,
1956.

Weinstein, E.A., Kahn, R.L. and Linn, L.: Peychosis During Electroshock
Therapy:
19.9.:

Its Relation to the

22-26, 1952.

Theony

of

Shock Therapy, Am.

J. Psychiat.,

��</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="2">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2">
                <text>Published Works</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2474">
              <text>Quantitative studies of slow wave activity following electroshock. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 8:158, 1956. (abstract).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2475">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2476">
              <text>mfp-02-01-001-21a-025</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2477">
              <text>1956</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2478">
              <text>&lt;a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank"&gt;Fink, Max, 1923-&lt;/a&gt;; Kahn, Robert L.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2479">
              <text>Published Works -- Articles and Reviews</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="46">
          <name>Relation</name>
          <description>A related resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2480">
              <text>The Max Fink Collection</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2481">
              <text>Several [preprint]s, drafts, and handwritten manuscripts of this title. Three short letters from Fink to Joseph S. A. Miller.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2482">
              <text>&lt;a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank"&gt;IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="2483">
              <text>Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York).</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="74450">
              <text>en-US</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="81011">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="87572">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="37">
          <name>Contributor</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="94133">
              <text/>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="5">
      <name>Published</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
