http://exhibits.library.stonybrook.edu/mfp/files/original/cef74e59ed477d4371fbd94a7bb94d2b.pdf 7daca76c32a0ff75bb1842b1eefffe68 PDF Text Text June 12, 196k 10: Dr. George A. Ulstt 7801!: m Fink, SUBJECT: Proposed Me Do of Agreement between the Division of Mental Diseases and the University of Missouri Home In general, the contract appears to be sound, with the exception that the role of the Director of the Missouri Institute of Psychiatry in a confused one. In addition, the recommendation regarding the Research Foundation is unclear. (1) The structure proposed by this contract provides that the Chairmen and Head of the Department of Psychiatry at the Missouri Institute of Psychiatry he called "Medical Direc— tor“, with on M. D., which equates him with the Director of the Institute under the State program; however, on page 3, in Section 3-D(2), the Advisory Committee en~ compasses the Head of the Department of Psychiatry, the Superintendent of the St. Louis State Hospital and all other sttte superintendents across the state, omitting the Director of the Institute. . In Section 3-D(3). the Head of the Department of Psychiatry is indicated as acting Chairman in the absence of the Been. which implies that this is not the general Advisory Com~ mitten but is a special Advisory Committee for the Institute. In Section 3-K (page 4), the Department Head is equated with the Director of tho Institute because it states that the "Department Head who in turn answers to the Division of Mental Diseases through the regular channels used by the ”1'1310“ o I! It appears that in drawing up this agreement there is a confusion of the role of the Director of the Hissonri Institute of Psychiatry and that of the Chairmen and acting Hood of the Department of Psychiatry. If indeed it is the intention of the contract to pro— vide that the Head of the Department of Psychiatry be other than the Director of the Missouri Institute of Psychiatry, then it would be important to clsrify the distinctions necessary in Doetions 3—3 and 3—3, where the Director of the Institute is clearly in mind, and in 3-D and 3~F, where the Department Head is clearly\ in mind if he is other than the head of the Institute. Egggggtg �; E E Dr. George A. Dlett s~12~st Page Two In Section 4~n.(ps3e 6), there is no ambiguity implicit in the fact that the Direetor of the hisaouri Institute of Psychiatry holds no ssst of the Advisory Connittee and yet is charged by the Division of Mental Diseases with the administration of the resesrch end training activities of the Institute. In Section t-A there is implicit that the Missouri Institute of Psychiatry may be celled upon to provide research space and facilities to the University, in which the Director of the Institute may possibly have very limited supervision. This ambiguity can best be corrected by deletion of the sentence regarding "adequate space and facilities". (3) Section 640 (page 7) is ambiguous in that it should specify the "Psychiatric Research Foundation of Missouri" instead of ”research foundation". It should be made explicit that the Foundation con continue with the approval of the Head of the Department of Psychiatry to provide the expenditure of funds within the Institute directly without being subject to the phrase "will be routed through the University”. If, indeed. that the funds be routed through the Univer» it is mandatory oity. the justification for the continuation of the Foundation is lost. (¢) I can find nowhere in the Academic Tenure Regulations or the By-sts or the proposed memo any suggestion regarding ssbbnt~ iosl leaves for holders of regular academic staff appointments. Should this be encompassed by a statement that the sabbatical leaves and other fringe benefits of the University of Missouri will apply equally to the members of the Missouri Institute of ‘ Psychiatry? Respectfully submitted, Fink, Director Max till/1b Me Do � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence to: Ulett, George A. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context mfp-05-00-018-4-455 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1964 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource <a title="Fink, Max, 1923-" href="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79039548" target="_blank">Fink, Max, 1923-</a> Subject The topic of the resource Correspondence -- Correspondence Relation A related resource The Max Fink Collection Description An account of the resource Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a title="IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/" target="_blank">IN COPYRIGHT - EDUCATIONAL USE PERMITTED</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Special Collections and University Archives, University Libraries. Stony Brook University Libraries (State University of New York). Language A language of the resource en-US Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Correspondence